UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to _______

Commission File Number 001-38371

 

One Stop Systems, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

 

 

Delaware

33-0885351

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

 

 

2235 Enterprise Street #110

Escondido, California 92029

(Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)

(877) 438-2724

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class:

Name of each exchange on which registered:

Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share

The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes   No 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes   No 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files).Yes   No 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer

 

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

 

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   No 

As of June 30, 2018, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $34,236,900, based on the closing price of the registrant’s common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market of $4.18 per share.  

As of February 28, 2019, the registrant had 14,270,268 shares of common stock (par value $0.0001) outstanding.

 

 

 

 

 


One Stop Systems, Inc.

FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2018

Table of Contents

 

 

 

Page

PART I

 

 

Item 1.

Business

3

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

20

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

34

Item 2.

Properties

34

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

34

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

34

 

 

 

PART II

 

 

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

35

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

37

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

38

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

56

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

56

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

56

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

57

Item 9B.

Other Information

59

 

 

 

PART III

 

 

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

60

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

65

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

78

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

80

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

82

 

 

 

PART IV

 

 

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

83

 

 

i


CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this Annual Report, including statements regarding our future operating results, financial position and cash flows, our business strategy and plans and our objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. This Annual Report also contains estimates and other statistical data made by independent parties and by us relating to market size and growth and other data about our industry. This data involves a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance and the future performance of the markets in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “could,” “intend,” “target,” “project,” “contemplate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions.  The forward-looking statements in this Annual Report are only predictions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, operating results, business strategy, short-term and long-term business operations and objectives. These forward- looking statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors. The events and circumstances reflected in our forward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all risk factors and uncertainties. Except as required by applicable law, we do not plan to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein, whether as a result of any new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise.

One Stop Systems, the One Stop Systems logo, and other trademarks or service marks of One Stop Systems appearing in this Annual Report are the property of One Stop Systems, Inc. This Annual Report also includes trademarks, tradenames and service marks that are the property of other organizations. Solely for convenience, trademarks and tradenames referred to in this Annual Report appear without the ® and ™ symbols, but those references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights, or that the applicable owner will not assert its rights, to these trademarks and tradenames.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information required by the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).  You may read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E. Washington D.C. 20549, U.S.A.  Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC0330 for further information on the public reference room.  Our SEC filings are also available to the public from the SEC’s internet site at http://www.sec.gov.

On our internet website, http://www.onestopsystems.com , we post the following recent filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically file with or furnish to the SEC: our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q our current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  The information in or accessible through the SEC and our website are not incorporated into, and are not considered part of, this filing. Further, our references to the URLs for these websites are intended to be inactive textual references only.

 

2


PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

 

Overview

One Stop Systems (OSS) designs, manufactures and markets specialized high-performance computing modules and systems.  These specialized computers incorporate state-of-the art components and allow our customers to offer high-end computing capabilities (often embedding within their equipment) to their target markets. Our customer applications often require ultra-fast processing power and the ability to quickly access and store ever-growing data sets. We are uniquely positioned as a specialized provider for the high-end of this marketplace providing custom servers, compute accelerators, solid-state storage arrays and system expansion systems. We deliver this high-end technology to our customers through the sale of equipment and embedded software.

The worldwide high-performance computing (HPC) market is expected to grow from $38.4 billion in 2018 to $43.9 billion by 2021, representing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.0%. We are establishing a leading position as a provider of specialized servers, compute accelerators and flash storage arrays to the high-end of this growing marketplace. In addition, we are a leading provider of PCIe over cable adapters and expansion systems used worldwide. PCIe is the high performance communication protocol used within servers for Input/Output expansion.  This protocol can also be used between servers and external systems to enable additional expansion at very high performance levels.   OSS systems offer high performance in a physically dense packaging, enabling our customers to build end-user systems that occupy less space and require less power and cooling than conventional systems.

The more GPU compute acceleration and flash-based storage resources available to a server, the faster it can process, store, and retrieve data. In cases where the amount of these resources does not fit within the constraints of a conventional server, PCIe is used to disaggregate the resources into a multi-chassis solution. We have built leading edge expertise in PCIe expansion technology and leveraged it to design and build systems that offer a high quantity and density of GPU compute acceleration, flash storage and other I/O resources.

A key element of our product strategy is technological market leadership. We believe a first-to-market strategy is key to our ability to continue to win significant OEM design wins. As a result, we are continually developing new state-of-the-art products. Our ability to drive the leading edge of technology is enabled by our strong relationships with strategic component manufactures, including NVIDIA (for GPUs), Western Digital (for flash memory) and Broadcom (for PCIe switch components). In each of these cases, OSS has access to product roadmaps and other technical information relating to future technology. Access to this information allows us to begin our design process well before the future components we are designing for even exist. This accelerates our time-to-market and allows us to produce and release state-of-the-art designs well ahead of our competitors.

High-performance computing applications are moving beyond the traditional academic and scientific realms to broad application across the spectrum of vertical markets. These applications include computationally intense areas like artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning, seismic exploration, media and entertainment, test and measurement, medical imaging, genomics, cyber security and defense. We are well positioned to leverage these market trends and capitalize on our unique core competencies in high speed system design. We have a proven track record of delivering first-to-market advanced technologies and have continued to do so recently with high-end GPU accelerators and high-performance flash arrays with light-weight removable high-capacity canisters. These products fit solidly into the emerging markets for specialized high-performance computing.

OSS sells its products worldwide to industry leading customers.  In total, we service over 1,500 customers per year, with major repeat customers including disguise, National Instruments, and Raytheon. We anticipate continued market growth in our target markets and sustaining the ability to increase market share through our leading technology, engineering expertise, supply chain management and go-to-market innovation.

We were originally organized as One Stop Systems, LLC, a California limited liability company in 1998 before converting into One Stop Systems, Inc., a California corporation in 1999. On July 6, 2016, we entered into a Merger Agreement and Plan of Reorganization with Mission Technology Group, Inc. (“Magma”) whereby Magma merged with and into OSS with OSS continuing as the surviving corporation. We reincorporated as a Delaware corporation on December 14, 2017 and began trading as a public company on the Nasdaq Capital Markets on February 1, 2018. On August 31, 2018, we acquired Concept Development Inc., a provider of specialty in-flight entertainment located in Irvine, California.  On October 31, 2018, we acquired Bressner Technology GmbH located near Munich, Germany.  Bressner is a valued-added reseller of high technology hardware.  Our principal executive offices are located at 2235 Enterprise Street, Suite 110, Escondido, California 92029 and our telephone number is (760) 745-9883. Our website address is www.onestopsystems.com. Information contained in, or accessible through, our website is for reference purposes only.

3


Industry Background

High performance computing refers to computing solutions capable of processing large amounts of data and storing and retrieving that data at speeds 10-1,000 times faster than a typical corporate computer. Increasingly, commercial companies, financial entities, governmental agencies, including the Department of Defense (DoD), and academic institutions are turning to high-performance computing solutions to analyze vast amounts of data to obtain meaningful and actionable insights. Two technologies, GPU compute accelerators and flash memory, enable systems to process and store data at significantly higher rates than traditional systems. By harnessing large quantities of these components, companies can receive necessary data analysis much more quickly. Industry experts typically divide the high-performance computing market into the following categories:

 

Servers – This market represents all high-end servers, which is composed of Supercomputers (>$500,000 per unit), Divisional Servers ($250,000-$500,000), Departmental Servers ($100,000-$250,000), and Workgroup Servers (<$100,000 per unit).

 

Storage – This includes both traditional hard disc drives and flash storage devices.

 

Middleware – A broad category encompassing programming environments, schedulers, and other tools outside the operating system.

 

Applications – Specific applications for high performance computing.

 

Services – All services associated with high performance computing.

Intersect360 Research categorizes and projects sales in the total high-performance computing market.

High Performance Computing Market by Product Category — Total Market Forecast by Economic Sectors ($M)

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

CAGR

 

Servers

 

 

12,480

 

 

 

13,072

 

 

 

13,370

 

 

 

14,443

 

 

 

6.53

%

Storage

 

 

6,460

 

 

 

6,845

 

 

 

7,272

 

 

 

7,772

 

 

 

8.33

%

Services

 

 

3,939

 

 

 

4,010

 

 

 

4,090

 

 

 

4,174

 

 

 

2.49

%

Software

 

 

9,502

 

 

 

9,852

 

 

 

10,243

 

 

 

10,775

 

 

 

5.45

%

Networks

 

 

2,955

 

 

 

3,066

 

 

 

3,190

 

 

 

3,324

 

 

 

5.20

%

Cloud

 

 

930

 

 

 

1,015

 

 

 

1,108

 

 

 

1,210

 

 

 

12.32

%

Other

 

 

2,134

 

 

 

2,183

 

 

 

2,238

 

 

 

2,296

 

 

 

3.18

%

Total

 

 

38,400

 

 

 

40,042

 

 

 

41,871

 

 

 

43,944

 

 

 

5.97

%

 

Source : HPC Advisory Council Website, Market Report, HPC Market Update, Total HPC Market by Revenue, June 2017, Report by Intersect360 Research, authored by Addison Snell, Christopher Willard, Ph.D., and Laura Segervall. (Accessed on July 23, 2017).

The markets for these products are large, and growing. The industry sectors that are currently or anticipated to require high-performance computing systems include:

 

 

Artificial Intelligence

 

Computer Aided Engineering

 

Test and Measurement

 

Media and Entertainment

 

Economics/Financial

 

Environmental Data Acquisition

 

Geosciences

4


 

Mechanical Design Defense

 

Government Laboratories

 

Medical Imaging

These industry sectors expect to deploy increasingly faster computing systems to meet industry and competitive goals. GPU computer acceleration and high-density flash storage are key subsets of the high-performance computing market.

GPU Compute Acceleration

The capabilities and speed of GPU accelerated computers are beginning to drive significant advances in AI and machine learning. Massive amounts of data are being collected, stored and analyzed by today’s sophisticated algorithms.   AI and machine learning are poised to transform worldwide business, as advances in computing speed and storage come together to enable businesses to solve complex problems.

High Density Solid-State Storage

The market for flash memory based solid-state storage systems is large and growing. According to a study by MarketsandMarkets, the flash storage market is growing at 9.5% per year and is expected to reach $25.3 billion by 2022. The proliferation of larger and larger databases, virtualized servers, virtual desktop servers, analytic application servers and other server configurations are feeding the need for higher capacity and higher performance storage.

Traditionally, companies have used hard disk drives for their primary storage.  Hard drive based systems are being replaced by flash memory based systems which offer higher capacity, performance and ruggedness.  Flash-based storage systems also consume significantly less power.

Flash-based storage systems are especially useful for many high performance computing applications, which deal with large amounts of data and the need for complex calculations to be completed very rapidly. In these applications, speed and efficiency are paramount. Military systems, for example, generate vast amounts of data using sensor systems, radar systems, and a myriad of other applications. This data needs to be collected, stored, analyzed and acted upon in a real-time environment.

Key Components of Our Business

Product Development

Our systems are built using the latest GPU and flash storage technologies and draw upon years of expertise in designing and manufacturing semi-custom systems for OEMs. We have a history of being first to market with many solutions for emerging technologies. When PCIe was introduced in 2005, we were the first company to produce PCIe over cable adapters allowing system-to-system communication at same speed as internal I/O expansion. Today, we are one of the largest providers of PCIe adapters and expansion components used worldwide.

When GPU technology and solid-state flash were first introduced, we began designing systems that maximized the effectiveness of these technologies. We now produce compute systems with large numbers of GPUs and flash memory to allow faster processing and data storage and retrieval. The more GPUs and flash devices available to a server the faster that system can process and store data.

We use leading edge, state-of-the art components from major technology providers to design purpose-built systems that solve customer problems in an efficient, cost-effective manner. We do not design silicon chips, but instead apply the technology provided by Intel, NVIDIA, Western Digital, Broadcom and others to deliver customer driven designs to provide true value to our customers.

5


Worldwide Sales

We provide our products on a worldwide basis and are supported through a network of reseller and distribution partners. Sales in North America and Europe are predominately driven by our direct sales force whereas Asian sales are driven through distributors. In June 2015, we formed our wholly-owned subsidiary One Stop Systems, GmbH (“OSS GmbH”), located within the Bressner GmbH facility in Gröbenzell, Germany.

On October 31, 2018, OSS GmbH acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Bressner Technology GmbH, (Bressner) a Germany Limited Liability Company.  This acquisition provides a strong European corporate presence with sales, marketing, engineering, manufacturing and support capabilities.

Recent Business Initiatives

On April 6, 2017, OSS formed SkyScale, LLC (“SkyScale”) to provide high-performance computing through the cloud. SkyScale is a 50/50 joint venture between OSS and Jacoma Investments, LLC, an entity affiliated with a member of our board of directors, which allows customers to lease state-of-the-art high performance computing hardware. This business has contributed only a small amount of revenue to the Company, and the Company is in the process of exiting this business area.

On May 9, 2017, OSS entered into an agreement to acquire the source code license to the Ion flash array software from Western Digital. We plan to continue to develop and sell Ion software with our high-density storage arrays, as well as servicing existing Western Digital software users. OSS Ion software works with our all-flash storage systems, and provides a critical point of differentiation with respect to speed and throughput. The OSS Ion software leverages flash storage to accelerate applications and storage-area network performance.   Having the Ion software source code and engineering team on-board allows us to strategically grow our all-flash storage business in the many markets as well as increases our software content over time.

On August 31, 2018, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of Concept Development Inc. (“CDI”) from CDI’s former stockholder (“CDI Stockholder”) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the “Merger Agreement”).  CDI specializes in the design and manufacturing of custom high-performance computing systems for airborne in-flight entertainment systems.  CDI is located in Irvine, California. The acquisition is expected to increase the Company’s access to the in-flight entertainment market and gain technical expertise in the design and manufacturing of airborne equipment.  

The Company paid cash of $646,759 and issued 1,266,364 shares of the Company’s common stock to the CDI Stockholder for 100% of CDI outstanding common stock. The fair value assigned to the shares of common stock was $4,194,673 which was based upon the closing price of OSS’s stock on August 31, 2018 of $3.63 less a discount of 8.75% for lack of marketability for a one year period.

On October 31, 2018, OSS GmbH, our wholly owned subsidiary, acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Bressner Technology GmbH, a Germany limited liability company located near Munich, Germany, from its principal owners for cash consideration of €4,725,000 (US$5,374,582) and stock consideration of 106,463 newly-issued restricted shares of the Company’s common stock. The fair value assigned to the shares of common stock was $220,890 which was based upon the closing price of OSS’s stock on October 31, 2018 of $2.47 less a discount of 13.0% for lack of marketability for a two year period.

What Sets OSS Apart

Several factors differentiate OSS from other suppliers of high-performance computing solutions:

 

Our expertise in PCIe expansion and building custom systems allows us to design reliable systems using this challenging highest performance technology with a greater quantity of GPUs and flash storage devices than other suppliers.

 

We design systems that both attach to existing servers through PCIe over cable leveraging our customer’s existing investments as well as all-in-one systems with the server, GPU computing and flash storage devices all included in a single package.

6


 

We produce the software required to operate high-capacity, low-latency storage systems used by defense systems and commercial applications and expect this will expand into other products in the future.

Our business model generally consists of developing specialized computing solutions that our OEM customers utilize as a major component of the equipment that they sell to end users.

Our niche is to provide reliable purpose-built platforms with the latest high-performance computing technology.

Business Strategy

We have traditionally followed a strategy of being first-to-market in leading edge technologies by designing and developing products that are delivered before our competitors. This market leader strategy is accomplished through what we term a “Catch the Wave” approach to the market. We currently have products spanning the spectrum of high-performance computing including servers, flash storage, GPU acceleration, networking and PCIe expansion. Within these product areas the OSS “Catch the Wave” approach implies that we:

 

anticipate trends in these markets;

 

consistently deploy resources in engineering and sales to bring innovative products to market before our competitors;

 

work closely and leverage strategic vendor relationships to get early access to future products and technologies;

 

seek to procure early design wins; and

 

continually monitoring the market for next generation technologies for which a new “Wave” may be forming.

Growth Strategy

OSS intends to continue its rapid growth through three avenues:

 

Ramp-up of existing OEM and military design-wins

Many of our design wins are in the early stages, and we anticipate significant revenue growth as they move into full production.

 

Winning new OEM and military program designs

Our technology leadership provides the “in” to many potential OEM relationships. As we continue to grow the Company, our capabilities and market recognition also grow rapidly, providing even more opportunities for OEM and military program design-ins.

 

Acquisitions of strategic companies

OSS has an experienced team that has negotiated and managed numerous acquisitions of smaller companies. We have identified a number of firms that we believe have potential to be acquired and could provide significant, accretive value to OSS. Some of the proceeds from our initial public offering have been used in our acquisition activities.

7


OSS is using the following criteria for potential acquisition targets:

 

Target has a presence in our served or desired markets.

 

Target’s products can be easily integrated into our product portfolio and/or product roadmap resulting in an accretive benefit to our existing position.

 

Target should be profitable with positive cash flow at the outset or shortly following the acquisition.

 

Will consider companies that can extend our markets geographically.

 

Will consider companies that have an existing incremental services revenue stream.

Our acquisition strategy has the following benefits for OSS and our stockholders:

 

Immediate acquisition of new customers and products. Acquisition of new engineering, sales, administrative and operations personnel.

 

The increase in size and scale of OSS which can be leveraged to lower overall costs and increase margins/profits.

 

Increased credibility with customers, vendors, and suppliers.

Our Opportunity

The worldwide high-performance computing market is expected to grow from $38.4 billion in 2018 to $43.9 billion by 2021. Within this market, OSS is positioned in the highest performance and fastest growing portions of the market including the server (custom and GPU accelerators), storage (flash arrays) and PCIe expansion sectors. Custom Built Servers

 

GPU Compute Accelerators

 

All Flash Arrays

 

PCIe Expansion and Adaptors

Custom Built Servers

Within the server sector, OSS has secured a niche position of building purpose-built specialty servers, which the major server suppliers choose not to supply as they require custom tuning and special features that major OEMs cannot easily provide. Such flexibility is difficult to maintain for major suppliers because their systems are not designed to reflect specific customer specifications. OSS on the other hand has continued to find efficient ways service this market profitably.  For example, OSS designs and builds a custom server with custom connectors and 16 high definition video media outputs that are used in the entertainment industry to provide multimedia at a live performance.

8


We believe the custom server segment is growing at a greater rate than the standard server segment. Intersect360 Research estimates that the market for high-performance servers is expected to be approximately $14.4 billion by 2021, with corporate market share as follow s :

 

Hewlett Packard

 

 

33.0

%

Dell

 

 

26.4

%

Lenovo

 

 

6.9

%

IBM

 

 

6.8

%

Cray

 

 

4.5

%

ATOS/Bull

 

 

2.6

%

Inspur

 

 

2.0

%

Fujitsu

 

 

1.8

%

Penguin

 

 

1.5

%

Huawei

 

 

1.2

%

Others

 

 

13.5

%

 

It is our experience that OSS is increasingly competitive in the “Others” category, where customers require their systems to meet specific operational specifications, power requirements, speed, latency, or other requirements not covered by traditional designs. We estimate that our addressable market for HPC computers is approximately 20% of the “Others” category in the above chart. This translates to an addressable market size of approximately $389 million with our current engineering capability and product set. Our strategy is to remain focused and be the best in this market segment.

GPU Compute Accelerators

GPU computing uses hardware components that are optimized to perform mathematical calculations in a rapid fashion. NVIDIA is the market leader in the design and manufacturing of these components. NVIDA has done extremely well in recent years as this part of the computing market is growing much faster compared to the traditional CPUs from companies like Intel.  OSS works closely with NVIDIA to design and build systems which use multiple GPUs to accelerate the applications being run by the computer.

The unique design of the GPU provides thousands of processing “cores” which act as individual coprocessors to speed up the calculations on large data sets. GPU acceleration is driving many of the newest and fastest growing technology opportunities in this new age of computing. Many of the applications that are gaining notoriety today have only become possible because of the ability of GPUs to optimize computational throughput, perform many tasks at once, and make sense of the massive amounts of data that is available to high performance algorithms.

Markets such as image rendering and processing, self-driving cars, deep learning, molecular modeling and genomics, advanced visualization, machine learning, and image processing, all benefit from the ability to use GPUs to accelerate the application. OSS builds specialized compute accelerators, using the latest GPU technology, to attach to traditional servers used in these emerging growth markets. Because of the relative newness of these markets, little market data exists to precisely define these markets, but we estimate these markets to be very large and growing. While we are beginning from a small base, we expect these markets to be valued in the billions of dollars in the near future. Because our strategy has been to be first-to-market with the fastest and densest compute accelerator appliances, we anticipate our addressable market here to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

 

We also have a strong position in the government market which, according to Grandview Research and Intersect360, constitutes 26% of the market that is growing to $46.2 billion by 2021. OSS products can form a basis for companies who wish to participate in the hyper-scale market, which includes deep learning and AI. This is a major technology trend that OSS is addressing through its product roadmap. Intersect360 estimates the deep learning market was worth more than $3.2 billion in 2018 with 41.7% growth projected from 2018 to 2013 resulting in $18.2 billion in 2023 according to MarketsandMarkets.

9


All Flash Arrays

We build flash storage arrays to customer specifications utilizing our unique know-how in packaging, cooling, and PCIe-over-cable. We deliver dense, high-performance systems that provide customers with extreme value and utility in the most demanding, data-intensive operations.

Through a strategic agreement with Western Digital, we have acquired the software engineering team and the appropriate source code license for the Ion flash array software.  This provides OSS flash arrays with a high level of differentiation relating to storage management, latency and throughput. Although we maintain an offering of standard flash array products, our expertise and success has been in providing arrays with specialized packaging for demanding applications that are not suitable for standard offerings.

For example, we provide products to a large military contractor for integration into a military aircraft that required us to provide a completely new ruggedized mil-spec flash array. This new product provides extreme data density with low weight and a high degree of portability and security for the data. We believe our experience and capability in high speed, low-latency, digital signaling via PCIe gives us an edge in providing these custom designs to OEMs, military programs and other special purpose applications.

The overall market for flash arrays is growing rapidly. According to IDC the flash storage market totaled more than $2.1 billion in the first quarter of 2018, up 55% compared to the same year-ago quarter, and is expected to grow to reach $12 billion by 2022. According to Dell’Oro Group about 82% of the total in the first quarter was attributed to traditional large OEMs, like Dell EMC, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Pure Storage and IBM. The remaining 18% is addressed by many smaller flash storage providers, including OSS. We believe that because our products are positively differentiated by speed, density, and management features, our offerings compete favorably in this market and provide a substantial growth opportunity.

OSS participates in the broader market for dense, high-performance flash storage systems that may or may not be deployed into data center environments. Since we develop custom flash storage arrays, we work closely with both OEMs and end users to insure they receive the product they want in the specific configuration, size and weight required for their application. We believe this gives OSS an advantageous position in a market that is growing rapidly and allows us to favorably compete in the market.

PCIe Expansion and Adaptors

PCIe (PCI Express) is a high-speed computer expansion standard. This standard defines the signals and connectors (i.e. slots) that are used for computer add-in cards (such as Ethernet or graphics). PCIe signaling can also be routed over a cable, allowing expansion input/output slots to be physically located in a separate chassis. This provides for the highest performance and lowest latency which is essential in this market.

Being able to route PCIe over a cable facilitates disaggregation of server functionality. That is, with PCIe, certain server functions no longer needed to be contained in the physical server chassis, but could instead be separated and continue to operate at full speed. From a practical perspective, servers could now be connected directly to larger storage arrays or other peripheral devices, with the resulting group of chassis operating as if they were all in the same physical chassis.

We began developing our first PCIe-over-cable adaptor in 2006, and were one of the early providers of PCIe adaptors. We recognized this as prime opportunity to utilize our core strengths, such as:

 

 

High-speed board design and layout

 

Hardware tuning to improve signal integrity

 

Design optimization for low cost

 

Rapid design capability

 

Manufacturing and supply chain management

10


This technology has now become a standard within the computer industry, and OSS customers have used our adaptors to connect their custom input/output chassis and achieve performance equivalence as if the input/output was integrated into the server box. This gives designers and integrators a degree of flexibility and utility in architecting computer systems that is unprecedented. For example, one of our customers has utilized PCIe-over-cable to connect its high performance video editing systems to a host computer, providing a system that is optimized for an application using standard servers. We have expanded our PCIe adaptor market in breadth and depth, including making adaptors for many OEM customers. To date, we have shipped more than 100,000 PCIe adaptor cards to customers globally.

With our expertise developed in designing adaptor cards, the logical extension of our capability led us to develop a method for expanding the PCIe bus into an external chassis containing one or many expansion slots. This allowed a customer to install multiple standard PCIe boards into a chassis and expand their system without having to add additional servers. A user could now connect a multiplicity of PCIe devices to a single server, and achieve performance and throughput that was not possible prior to the introduction of PCIe.

We have been a leader in PCIe expansion backplanes and chassis through generations 1, 2 and 3. As PCIe evolves through generations 4 and 5, we are uniquely positioned to continue our leadership role in this market. We currently offer what we believe to be the largest PCIe expansion product line breadth, with chassis and backplanes that offer expansion from one to 64 slots. Due to its greater data throughput and flexibility of design, we believe this is a growing market, and we intend to maintain our leadership role.

Our Technology

We design and manufacture high performance computing systems that increase compute performance while reducing cost and impact to the infrastructure. Our high-density compute accelerators connect directly to a server’s PCIe bus, delivering substantial compute performance. Our flash storage arrays support hundreds of terabytes of high-speed storage that can also be accessed by multiple servers.

Technology Drivers for OSS High-Performance Computing Business

OSS has developed expertise and core competencies in the three fundamental technology drivers of today’s high-performance computing market. Namely, high-speed serial interconnect technology, compute acceleration utilizing GPUs, and low latency flash storage. In combination, these technologies are changing the economics of computing, bringing high-performance computing within the grasp of a wide range of new industries and commercial applications. Simultaneously the emergence of massive data being generated in each of these industries is pushing the requirement for state-of-the-art technology.

The opportunity is not only to provide competitive advantage for corporations, but also address some of the most fundamental challenges in life science, energy and security. OSS is well situated to leverage these major industry forces. By exploiting its unique set of expertise in the underpinning technologies of high-performance computing, OSS will continue to deliver world leading solutions, with the opportunity to capture a growing market share of this rapidly expanding marketplace.

Switched Serial Interconnect

Switched serial interconnects are the data highways connecting many elements of today’s high-performance computing platforms. At ever increasing speeds, these pathways move data between system’s processing units, storage, networking, and peripheral elements. For high performance computing the primary processing, storage and peripheral interconnect is PCIe Gen 3. PCIe Gen 3 has an ability to run up to 16 lanes in parallel, which allows up to 16 gigabytes per second bandwidth between system elements.

Serial switches incorporated in system design allow many system elements to be connected together in a non-blocking interconnect fabric at PCIe Gen 3 speeds. This allows systems to scale internally avoiding bottlenecks. The serial interconnect can be embedded directly in the computer printed circuit boards, across connectors board-to-board, or traverse across copper or optical cables for chassis-to-chassis connection. Due to the extremely high speeds, the design considerations around signal integrity are rigorous and with unforgiving tolerances. PCIe Gen 4 will begin deployment in 2019, doubling the interconnect speed.

11


Serial interconnects are also used to interconnect nodes into larger scale networks and clusters. In this case, the primary interconnects are Infiniband and Ethernet. These technologies have the advantage of scaling to very high numbers of network elements over potentially large distances. The tradeoff over PCIe is higher latency (transit time across the interconnect) and protocol complexity requiring processing cycles to manage. Many high-performance computing deployments incorporate these interconnect technologies in order to deliver large scale solutions with optimized technology selections for each system aspect. In summary, PCIe is used at the local level for the ultimate performance/low latency and these other interconnects are used to expand the network.

Compute Acceleration with GPUs.

Over the last several years, GPUs have evolved from graphics display acceleration to becoming general-purpose processing workhorses for high-performance computing systems. Today, the majority of the fastest supercomputers in the world utilize GPUs as their primary compute engines. GPUs are ideal for high-performance computing workloads because of their ability to do massively parallel processing. While traditional CPUs today may have dozens of processing cores, GPUs have thousands of cores that are all able to execute calculations simultaneously.

For many high-performance applications, fundamental pieces of the code can be optimized to run in parallel and therefore experience significant performance enhancements. NVIDIA, a key supplier of GPUs to the market, has done extensive benchmarking showing the ability of single GPU based machines to exceed the performance of dozens or even thousands of traditional CPU-only computers. NVIDIA has worked extensively with the software development community, and hundreds of applications have been tuned and developed to run on GPUs.

The current NVIDIA GPU Applications catalog lists more than 400 such applications across a broad set of market spaces including:

 

 

Computational Finance

 

Climate, Weather and Ocean Modeling

 

Computational Chemistry and Biology

 

Data Science and Analytics

 

Deep Learning and Machine Learning

 

Federal Defense and Intelligence

 

Genomics

 

Manufacturing

 

Media and Entertainment

 

Medical Imaging

 

Oil and Gas

 

Safety and Security

Many of these applications also scale performance based on the number of GPU components utilized. OSS has designed multi-GPU systems including up to 16 GPUs in a single system. Current state-of-the art GPUs provide over 7 teraflops of performance, with future products set to dramatically increase overall processing capabilities in the years to come.

Although GPUs provide tremendous application performance advantages, they pose significant system design challenges due to their high power requirements. High-end GPUs can require as much as 350 watts of power, which generates a tremendous amount of heat. Sophisticated power distribution and cooling designs are required, especially for large scale systems with multiple GPUs per chassis.

12


PCI Express Flash Storage – NVMe protocol

The use of flash memory technology for system storage has gained traction over the last several years, as the cost per gigabyte has continued to dropFlash memory is now becoming the ubiquitous storage technology in high-performance systems.

Combined with the move away from traditional rotating hard drive technology has been the trend toward eliminating traditional storage protocols in favor of low latency flash memory protocols. Newer flash memory modules utilize a protocol known as NVNe, which connects the flash memory directly to the system’s PCIe interconnect. This direct connection allows for very high bandwidth between the storage and the other system elements and eliminates the need for protocol translation as data is moved from storage subsystems to and from the compute complex.

Today, flash memory modules with capacities up to 8 terabytes and PCIe Gen 3 interfaces are available. OSS flash storage arrays with hundreds of terabytes of capacity are available, enabling the scaling of high-speed storage to meet the full range of high-performance application requirements.

Core Technical Capabilities

For 20 years, OSS has developed unique expertise and core competency across the fundamental technologies of today’s rapidly expanding specialized high-performance computing marketplace. These valuable assets are embedded in the leading-edge engineering capabilities of our engineers, the proprietary intellectual property residing in our vast library of designs, and our brand equity based on our reputation as a high-quality producer of state-of-the-art custom and standard solutions across a broad array of markets.

High Speed System Interconnect Design

Our electrical engineers are experts in high speed digital signaling design. They have continually designed at the leading edge of the state-of-the-art signaling speeds, as semiconductor technology has driven up the clock rate of digital transmission. We have consistently been among a small handful of companies able to come to market first with the latest technology. In fact, we delivered the industry’s first PCIe over cable solutions for PCIe Gen 1, Gen 2 and Gen 3 and are currently on track to accomplish this again in Gen 4. The expertise required includes circuit design, PCB (printed circuit board) layout and routing optimizations all with a focus on achieving the highest levels of signal integrity. In our current systems, PCIe Gen 3 signals are propagated across multiple PCBs, connectors, and copper cabling while maintaining the ability to recognize digital signal transitions at 8 billion times per second.

In high-performance computing systems the trajectory of ever increasing signaling speeds is continuing.  Next generations of PCIe and nvlink will increase signaling rates to 16 and 20 gigahertz (billions of transitions per second).  An ever-shrinking set of companies have the capability to design robust, highly-reliable systems at these speeds. We believe our core competency in large-scale, high-speed design and layout will allow us to remain on the forefront of this growing industry.

Complex System Design

In addition to low-level signal integrity design expertise, we have amassed expertise and intellectual property in high-performance system architecture design. This expertise allows us to develop extremely sophisticated systems with massive scaling, while meeting customer demands for reliability, cost, and flexibility.

We have developed the deep knowledge for high-capacity input/output systems and operating system adjustments and configuration tuning required. Our engineers are often called upon to co-design with OEM designers to create the perfect fit solution for their customers.

For highly scalable systems, a deep understanding and experience with switching topologies and interconnect fabric design is required. We have worked with serial switching technology starting with the first generation of PCIe and have been an innovator in creating unique and flexible topologies to meet the specific needs of the customers. Creating custom solutions for unique customer solutions is a core competency and relies on this deep knowledge of switch capabilities and limitations.

13


For maximum system performance, design for optimizing data transfer speeds is also an important consideration. OSS has developed expertise in system design to leverage peer-to-peer data flows between GPUs and pioneering techniques for optimized data flows between flash storage and GPU compute engines. Our systems optimize switch and GPU configuration topologies to optimize GPU-to-GPU communication without requiring latency-inducing data transfer between host dual processors. Our platforms feature RDMA (remote direct memory access) across compute nodes, which support data transfer without burdening the host CPU.

OSS has pioneered the ability to extend the PCIe bus beyond the confines of a single enclosure, opening the possibility of flexible system expansion options. We believe we are one of the leading designers and suppliers of PCIe host bus adapters that extend PCIe signals from the host motherboard across copper or optical cables to expansion enclosures. OSS adapters provide both ends of the external cable connection. Our expertise in high-speed signal design in printed circuit boards, connectors and cables is essential to successful expansion designs. We also hold expertise in incorporating clustering and rack scale expansion into our system designs, including 100 gigabit Ethernet, 100 gigabit Infiniband, and emerging PCIe top-of-rack switch technology.

Expertise in power, cooling and mechanical design are required to address the requirements of the high-performance computing customers. We have developed leadership design capability in high-power design and distribution within large rack enclosures. High-end GPUs today require 350 watts or above, and in our high-end systems up to 16 of these can reside in a single chassis. Thousands of kilowatts of redundant power are required. Power stability and huge thermal loads are some of the critical design issues that must be addressed.

We have expertise in power distribution, redundant power and complex chassis cooling design, including materials selection, airflow simulation, fan technology and cable routing. We have also developed extensive intellectual property in regulatory compliance of complex high-performance computing system design across emission, shock, vibration, thermal, humidity and other environmental requirements that are required for highly reliable and highly available solutions. OSS engineers are experts in design for regulatory testing for FCC (Federal Communications Commission), CE (European Conformity), UL (Underwriters Laboratories), and Mil-Spec (Military Standard) standards. Additionally, we have expertise in rapid prototyping, design for manufacturability, and design for serviceability.

Storage Management Software

Given our hardware design and integration expertise, we see the next natural step is to add a robust software capability that will allow us to offer more optimized and customized systems. Our Ion software design team provides the expertise to deliver full server and storage solutions that produce the highest performance from today’s leading-edge flash storage devices.

The Ion software allows flash-based modules to be put into a variety of storage and network configurations which can then be accessed by multiple servers. The Ion software can do this cost-effectively, while preserving the low latency that is vital for many business and mission-critical enterprise applications, from database and transaction processing to massive data collection programs. Ion also has a full high-availability option to ensure complete data integrity.

In-house mature and established foundational storage software allows OSS to add new products and capabilities to its product portfolio. Possibilities range from increasing data efficiency with de-duplication and compression, to improving system manageability and adding software-defined storage to our server products.

Benefits of Technology and Core Capabilities to our Customers

Due to our core capabilities, we can provide our high-performance computing customers with platforms possessing high reliability and cost effectiveness. Such performance allows our customers to solve bigger problems faster, and save the cost and time of highly-paid engineers, data scientists, and other human resources. Our technology enhances innovation by allowing more ‘what-if’ analysis in a finite amount of time. Our price/performance leadership enhances our customers’ competitiveness, and lowers capital expense and total cost of ownership.

14


Our Products

OSS has developed a complete line of products that have been customized for the benefit of its customers.

GPU Appliances – high-density, fully integrated computer clusters that are purpose-built for user applications. They provide thousands of cores and hundreds of teraflops of computing performance.

GPU Expansion – expansion units can add hundreds or thousands of computing cores with hundreds of teraflops of computing performance to virtually any OEM server.

Flash Storage and Network Appliances – networked storage appliances optimized for the environment and system software of our customers. These offer flexible and powerful turnkey, customer-driven solutions for the HPC market.

Flash Storage Arrays – arrays that provide hundreds of terabytes of storage and millions of input/output operations per second with flash memory. They are flexible, powerful, and configurable for customers in the HPC market.

Servers – OSS designs servers optimized for PCIe-over-cable expansion. Available in various turn-key and custom configurations, they provide simple, reliable and cost-effective server solutions. These servers are optimized to work seamlessly with other OSS systems and appliances.

Desktop Computing Appliances – OSS designs and builds desktop expansion appliances in many configurations that add input/output flexibility to any user’s desktop system. These appliances come pre-configured with many combinations of flash memory, GPUs, and other add-in boards.

PCIe Expansion – PCIe is the standard for high speed connectivity from a server to a PCIe device. It provides vastly faster throughput compared to USB or Ethernet in a simple, cost-effective connection. It requires no special software, which adds no overhead to the system, and improves latency of throughput. OSS provides cables, kits, backplanes, enclosures, switches, and adaptor cards for this market.

Customers

We serve a global clientele consisting of multinational companies, governmental agencies, and leading technology providers. Some of our key customers are set forth below, including case studies illustrating how we provide custom solutions.

Raytheon – OSS is working closely with Raytheon to build a customized flash storage array, with flash drives installed in removable canisters. Raytheon has installed these storage arrays on a current military aircraft equipped with multiple sensors and data capture arrays. These devices are fully compliant with appropriate military specifications, including shock and vibration. Each canister has the capacity to save 50 terabytes of data and weighs only 6.5 pounds. Data is captured onto the OSS flash array canisters, which can be easily removed at the end of the mission for analysis. Our expertise in designing and manufacturing high-density flash arrays in the lightest, most compact package allow military aircraft to realize faster turn-arounds during critical missions. These systems are intended to be incorporated into new aircraft and retrofitted into the existing fleet.

disguise – disguise is the leading provider of hardware and software that allows their customers to produce live events, television broadcasts, theater effects, and special effects for concert tours. OSS has worked with disguise to design purpose-built, custom servers that act as video controllers for special effects at these events. These servers work seamlessly with disguise software applications, providing up to 16 simultaneous video outputs that supports a rich array of special effects. Events like the Super Bowl halftime show and numerous musical concerts rely upon disguise controllers, designed and produced by OSS, to deliver a lasting impression on audiences.

15


National Instruments – National Instruments is a market leader and multinational company that produces automated test equipment and virtual instrumentation software. OSS provides several PXI/PXIe/PCIe interface cards that are branded by National Instruments. OSS acts as an extension to National Instruments’ engineering group, allowing National to complete their product roadmap in a timely and cost-effective manner.

Sales and Marketing

Our sales and marketing efforts are focused on promoting sales and brand awareness.

Sales

Our sales efforts entail three main areas:

 

General Sales – OSS maintains a web site and direct sales team that sell directly to end-users. This includes e-commerce sales via typical web store functionality, and direct calling of potential customers to provide unique solutions that fits their needs. The OSS direct sales team typically works in the OSS booth at tradeshows, directly interacting with potential customers and presenting solutions for their high-performance needs.

 

OEM Focused Sales – Our direct sales team also works to identify and develop potential OEM and government program customers. This is the largest and fastest growing part of our business. For typical OEM customers, we design and build customer specified systems that are branded with the OEMs name and label. These companies then resell the products through their own channels. We actively seek this type of relationship, which is leveraged as a sales multiplier, allowing us to grow sales at a faster rate without adding more dedicated sales resources.

 

Channels – We have a dedicated sales resource that manages our worldwide network of resellers and distributors. We typically sell standard products through these channels, which allow us to achieve global customer touch without requiring a physical presence in all geographies. With the recent acquisition of Bressner, we have a greater presents in Europe which will allow greater access to those markets.

Marketing

Our marketing department focuses on building cost effective brand awareness in several ways. We generate interest by utilizing traditional and non-traditional marketing to convey the uniqueness and compelling value of our products and services. The markets we target include machine learning, deep learning, finance, medical equipment, in-flight entertainment, manufacturing automation, defense/government, oil and gas exploration, media and entertainment. Among the many channels utilized are:

 

Social Media – We regularly use Facebook and Twitter to instantly alert the followers of OSS to new events, products, services, and customer stories.

 

Publications – We periodically publish white papers, customer success stories, and other demand generation articles in periodicals and newsletters that include InsideHPC, Storage Newsletter, and HPC wire. We also purchase some print ads in many industry magazines.

 

Trade Shows – OSS participates in many tradeshow and events during the marketing year. Among these are AFCEA/USNI West, Rice University Oil and Gas Conference, National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), GPU Technology Conference (GTC), Gearfest, ISC (high performance computing show), HPC Summit, AI World, Supercomputing, and GTC Tokyo. OSS evaluates the value and costs of each show on an annual basis, and the number and themes of our participation may change from year to year.

As we grow, it is anticipated our marketing efforts will likewise continue to increase in size and diversity.

16


Competition

In many cases, our primary competition is actually our potential customer. Our operational model lends itself to understanding technical and physical specifications, completing a rapid design based on our library of over 600 previous designs and prototypes, building a rapid prototype for customer approval, and an efficient design-to-manufacturing process.

Most of our OEM customers have sophisticated design capabilities in-house. They come to OSS for our particular expertise and experience, which allows us to work collaboratively with the customer to produce more advanced systems in a shorter timeframe. In most cases, the primary alternative to engaging OSS is for the customer to design the products themselves. We win when our customers realize that together we can produce better products faster and more cost-effectively than they can themselves. This has proven to be particularly evident when customers require state-of-the-art products that are constructed of parts available commercially. This has resulted in several design wins that demonstrate our flexibility and how we can work closely with large OEM and government customers.

We also compete with established competitors, third party competitive products and new entrants into the markets we serve. Established competitors include IBM, Lenovo, HP and Dell. Each offers a broad range of standard products and services for this market. In many cases, these companies are able to meet their customer needs thought their standard product offerings. In other cases, these companies work with us to help extend their product capabilities to meet customer-specific requirements.

Third party competitive products include cases where the manufacturers of the underlying chip or board-level products decide to also offer system-level products. This is the case with Intel, NVIDIA, Western Digital and others. These offerings tend to be tactical, short-term products that are intended to demonstrate a new technology, rather than long-term forays into the systems business. In addition these “technology demonstration systems” tend to be priced at high levels, making them less competitive once the newness factor wears off.

New market entrants continue to move into the rapidly evolving high-performance computing space. Some, such as Pure Storage, raise significant amounts of capital and endure huge loses in an attempt to establish market share.

Manufacturing and Operations

OSS is certified under ISO 9001-20015 for “design, manufacture, and supply of industrial computers.” This means OSS has demonstrated its ability to consistently provide products that meet both customer requirements and applicable regulatory or statutory requirements. It also indicates that we have programs and processes in place to ensure a high level of customer satisfaction, as well as a continuous improvement program that ensures OSS gets better over time.

We utilize lean principles to drive our manufacturing and assembly process. One of the key aspects of this is our application of just-in-time principles that ensure effective ordering and utilization of inventory, and this helps optimize cash flow throughout the manufacturing cycle. Within the manufacturing process, our operations encompass three categories of “builds:”

 

Standard Builds – These are builds of standard products that are sold with little or no customization or non-standard features. These are products that are ready to be installed or integrated by the customer upon receipt.

 

Custom Builds – Custom builds involve a product built to a customer specification. Upon receipt, the customer has a unique product that performs all the functions and has the physical dimensions that match their specifications.

 

Engineering Project Builds – OSS supports the product development process by building models and prototypes of products. Developed by the OSS engineering group, the prototypes can be of standard or custom products.

17


OSS is dedicated to quality and customer satisfaction. Within the manufacturing operations function at OSS, our processes begin with the end goal in mind. This means we start with the customer. All our business processes begin with the idea that the customer is the essence of why we exist. Our continuous improvement efforts require us to review products, services, and processes with the idea that minor changes can lead to greater outcomes for our customers.

While we are cognizant of the additive nature of small improvements, we believe a disciplined approach to improvement sometime leads to extraordinary, large, and positive advances in our products and services. This is extremely important to OSS, as our goal is to bring the most advanced leading-edge technologies to our customers before our competitors can. Our operations strategy supports our overall mission of being first to market with customized, leading-edge products that are best-in-market in terms of speed and overall performance.

Research and Development

Research and development at OSS is centered on the exploitation of key technologies as they evolve in the marketplace. Our product roadmap reflects new component technologies for CPUs, GPUs, flash storage, and advanced PCIe switches. We design first-to-market, custom implementations utilizing these component technologies. Accordingly, our focus lies not in the capital-intensive development of silicon implementations of technologies (i.e., chips, processors, GPUs, or storage devices), but rather in taking leading-edge technologies and building first-to-market products that fully exploit those technologies for solving customer problems.

The OSS research and development strategy can be summarized as follows: OSS drives design wins by utilizing key new technologies to develop products that are leading edge and first to market.

Some examples of OSS developments:

 

GPU compute accelerators with the most GPUs per rack unit.

 

Networking of GPUs.

 

Broad range of solutions, due to specific customer design.

 

Capability to expand existing servers from virtually any OEM.

 

First-to-market products as new GPUs are introduced by NVIDIA, Intel, Western Digital and Broadcom.

 

Complete customization per the needs of our OEM customers.

 

Integration of multiple new technologies (servers, GPUs, flash drives, and PCIe) into optimized products for our OEM customers.

Intellectual Property

The primary intellectual property value of OSS emanates from the more than 600 individual design projects we have undertaken over the decades since our founding. These designs are archived and cataloged, so we rarely begin a new design from scratch.

Over the years, our team has developed and maintained expertise in high-speed signal design and analysis, electronic and mechanical packaging, PCIe-over-cable, fiber optics transmission, high-speed/density flash arrays, and integration and deployment of GPUs in compute accelerators and servers. This extensive expertise positions us to expand and rationalize our product line to meet the growing and ever-changing HPC market.

18


Employees

As of December 31, 2018, we had approximately 114 employees or which 112 are full-time and 2 are part-time employees.  Our employees are comprised 90 which are domestic and 24 which are international. Our employees include highly skilled engineers, technicians, assemblers, and support staff. They are housed in multiple facilities, and are led by a management team that is supportive and helpful. We have experienced very little turnover of personnel in the past and endeavor to provide an environment that allows meaningful employee input to all functional areas of the Company. The management team provides transparency to its employees through regular communication meetings designed to update employees on current results and future expectations. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement or represented by a labor union. We consider our relationship with our employees to be strong.

Facilities

Our corporate headquarters are in a leased space comprising approximately 24,032 square feet in Escondido, California under a lease that was renewed in August 2018 and now expires in August 2024.  Our headquarters were expanded to accommodate increased manufacturing capacity and to assimilate personnel from a facility on which the Company did not renew its lease. We also lease a 3,208 square foot facility in Salt Lake City, Utah that houses our Ion software development team. CDI is the lessee of approximately 12,000 square feet located in Irvine, California with the lease expiring in June 2021.  Bressner Technology, which was acquired in October 2018, leases space comprising 8,073 square feet which lease expires in December 2019.  

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may be a party to legal proceedings and subject to claims incident in the ordinary course of business. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or business. Regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, and other factors.

19


ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as the other information in this Annual Report, including our financial statements and the related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” before deciding whether to invest in our common stock. The occurrence of any of the events or developments described below could harm our business, financial condition, operating results, and growth prospects. In such an event, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

The market for our products is developing and may not develop as we expect.

The market for our high performance computing (“HPC”) products is developing and may not develop as we expect. The market for cutting-edge, high performance computing products is characterized by rapid advances in technologies. We believe our future success will depend in large part on our ability to develop products, new business initiatives and creating innovative and custom designs for our customers. The growth of server clusters, specialized or high performance applications, and hosted software solutions which require fast and efficient data processing, is crucial to our success. It is difficult to predict the development of the demand for high performance computing, supercomputers, and related hardware solutions, the size and growth rate for this market, the entry of competitive products, or the success of existing competitive products. Any expansion in our market depends on several factors, including the demand, cost, performance, and perceived value associated with our products. If our products are not adopted or there is a reduction in demand for our products caused by a lack of customer acceptance, a slowdown in demand for computational power, an overabundance of unused computational power, technological challenges, competing technologies and products, decreases in corporate spending, weakening economic conditions, or otherwise, it could result in reduced customer orders, early order cancellations, the loss of customers, or decreased sales, any of which would adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly, which makes our future operating results difficult to predict and could cause our operating results to fall below expectations or our guidance.

Our quarterly and annual operating results have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate significantly in the future, which makes it difficult for us to predict our future operating results. The timing and size of sales of our products are variable and difficult to predict and can result in fluctuations in our net sales from period to period. In addition, our budgeted expense levels depend in part on our expectation of future sales. Any substantial adjustment to expenses to account for lower levels of sales is difficult and takes time, thus we may not be able to reduce our costs sufficiently to compensate for a shortfall in net sales, and even a small shortfall in net sales could disproportionately and adversely affect our operating margin and operating results for a given quarter.

Our operating results may also fluctuate due to a variety of other factors, many of which are outside our control, including the changing and volatile local, national, and international economic environments, any of which may cause our stock price to fluctuate. Besides the other risks in this “Risk Factors” section, factors that may affect our operations include:

 

fluctuations in demand for our products and services;

 

the inherent complexity, length, and associated unpredictability of product development windows and product lifecycles;

 

changes in customers’ budgets for technology purchases and delays in their purchasing cycles;

 

changing market conditions;

 

any significant changes in the competitive dynamics of our markets, including new entrants, or further consolidation;

 

our ability to continue to broaden our customer base beyond our traditional customers;

20


 

the timing of product releases or upgrades by us or our competitors; and

 

our ability to develop, introduce, and ship in a timely manner new products and product enhancements and anticipate future market demands that meet our customers’ requirements.

Each of these factors individually, or the cumulative effect of two or more of these factors, could result in large fluctuations in our quarterly and annual operating results. As a result, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful. You should not rely on our past results as an indication of future performance.

Our products are subject to competition, including competition from the customers to whom we sell.

Servers, computer accelerators, flash storage arrays, PCIe expansion products, and other products that we design, manufacture, and sell or license are subject to competition. The computer hardware and technology fields are well established with limited, and in many cases no, intellectual property and technological barriers to entry. The markets in which we operate are competitive and we expect competition to increase in the future from established competitors and new market entrants. The markets are influenced by, among others, brand awareness and reputation, price, strength and scale of sales and marketing efforts, professional services and customer support, product features, reliability and performance, scalability of products, and breadth of product offerings. Due to the nature of our products, competition occurs at the design, performance, and sales stages. A design or sales win by us does not limit further competition and our customers may purchase competitive products from third parties at any time. This competition could result in increased pricing pressure, reduced profit margins, increased sales and marketing expenses and failure to increase, or the loss of, market share, any of which would likely seriously harm our business, operating results or financial condition. From a cost and control perspective, our products are specialized and thus generally cost more than our competitors’ products. If our ability to design specialized solutions is deemed to be on par or of lesser value than competing solutions, we could lose our customers and prospects.

Many of our customers and competitors, often with substantially more resources or larger economies of scale, produce products that are competitive with our products. Many of these third parties mass-produce hardware solutions and have not heavily invested in or allocated resources to the smaller scale specialized products and solutions we design. A decrease in the cost of general mass-produced hardware solutions, which can serve as a substitute for our products, or the entrance of or additional allocation of resources by one of these customers or competitors into the production of specialized systems which compete with our products could create increased pricing pressure, reduced profit margins, increased sales and marketing expenses, or the loss of market share or expected market share, any of which may significantly harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

New entrants and the introduction of other distribution models in our markets may harm our competitive position.

The markets for development, distribution, and sale of our high performance computing solutions are rapidly evolving. New entrants seeking to gain market share by introducing new technology, new products and new server configurations may make it more difficult for us to sell our products and earn design wins which could create increased pricing pressure, reduced profit margins, increased sales and marketing expenses, or the loss of market share or expected market share, any of which may significantly harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

Large computer hardware and equipment manufacturers and suppliers have traditionally designed, produced, and sold general purpose servers, and storage arrays and related products and equipment. Our customers supplement these general purpose systems by purchasing our specialized or customized systems or supplemental products which improve the speed, efficiency, or performance of such systems. If the speed, efficiency, or computational power of such general purpose systems increases such that supplemental or specialized products become unnecessary, or the cost of such general purpose systems declines such that it is more cost effective for prospective customers to add general-purpose equipment rather than specialized or supplemental equipment, we could experience a significant decline in demand for the products which may significantly harm to our business, operating results and financial condition.

21


Our products compete with and supplement general purpose servers, storage systems and related equipment. If the producers of general purpose equipment implement proprietary standards, software, interfaces, or other interoperability restrictions, including controls which restrict the equipment’s compatibility with third party systems, we could experience a significant decline in sales because our products would not be interoperable with such systems, resulting in may significantly harm to our business, operating results and financial condition.

In our marketplace, general-purpose equipment is traditionally mass-produced and available to order while specialized equipment and custom bulk-order equipment is subject to a bid-based purchase system. If one or more large manufacturers of general or standard servers storage arrays, or related products and equipment provide specialized, customized, or supplementary equipment on a made-to-order or generally available basis, we could be forced to reduce our prices or change our selling model to remain competitive which would significantly harm to our business, operating results and financial condition.

If we are unable to manage our growth and expand our operations successfully, our business and operating results will be harmed and our reputation may be damaged.

We have expanded our operations significantly since inception and anticipate that further significant expansion will be required to achieve our business objectives. The growth and expansion of our business and product offerings places a continuous and significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources. Any such future growth would also add complexity to and require effective coordination throughout our organization. To manage any future growth effectively, we must continue to improve and expand our information technology and financial infrastructure, our operating and administrative systems and controls, and our ability to manage headcount, capital and processes in an efficient manner. We may not be able to successfully implement improvements to these systems and processes in a timely or efficient manner, which could result in additional operating inefficiencies and could cause our costs to increase more than planned. If we do increase our operating expenses in anticipation of the growth of our business and this growth does not meet our expectations, our operating results may be negatively impacted. If we are unable to manage future expansion, our ability to provide high quality products and services could be harmed, which could damage our reputation and brand and may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

A limited number of customers represent a significant portion of our sales. If we were to lose any of these customers, our sales could decrease significantly.

In the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, two customers, disguise (formerly d3) and Raytheon accounted for approximately 61%, and 43% of net sales of OSS, excluding the revenue of the recent acquisitions of CDI and Bressner, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, three customers accounted for 74% of net trade accounts receivable and, as of December 31, 2017, three customers accounted for 69% of net trade accounts receivables, excluding recent acquisitions.

A significant portion of revenue for CDI is derived from two customers, Thales and Inflight Canada which represents approximately 67% of its revenue earned since CDI’s acquisition on August 31, 2018.  Two customers represented 84% of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2018.

Bressner Technologies GmbH has two customers which represent approximately 47% of the Company’s revenue earned since their acquisition on October 31, 2018.  Two customers represented 61% of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2018.

In addition, a few products comprise a significant amount of our sales, and the discontinuation, modification, or obsolescence of such products may materially and adversely affect our sales and results of operations. Any loss of, or a significant reduction in purchases by, these other significant customers or a decrease in the high performance applications that drive the use of our products, or the modification, discontinuation, or obsolescence of a device which constitutes a significant portion of our sales could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

22


Some of our contracts allow our customers to have access to the design drawings for products which we have designed and manufacture for them .

Some of our contracts allow our customers to have access to the design drawings for products which we have designed and manufacture for them.  In some cases these drawings are included as a deliverable in conjunction with their non-recurring engineering fee, and in other cases, an additional fee is required to obtain the drawings package.  Since these customers have access to the drawings, there is no guarantee that they will continue to purchase the manufactured products from OSS.  This arrangement applies to our large media and entertainment customer, several of the customers within the recently acquired CDI business and other customers.  Neither our media and entertainment customer, nor our current CDI customers have had any of the OSS-designed products manufactured by anyone other than OSS, but they may have the capability to do so in the future.

We rely on a limited number of parts suppliers to support our manufacturing and design processes.

We rely on a limited number of suppliers to provide us with the necessary devices, parts and systems to allow us to build, design and manufacture our products, and the failure to manage our relationships with these parties successfully could adversely affect our ability to market and sell our products. In the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, excluding recent acquisitions, three suppliers, Concisys, Inc., Exact Computers and Supermicro, accounted for approximately 45%, and 48%, respectively, of materials purchased.

Although we do believe we could locate additional suppliers to fulfill our needs, any significant change in our relationship with these suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition unless and until we are able to find suitable replacements. We make substantially all of our purchases from our contract suppliers on a purchase order basis. Our suppliers are not required to supply our raw materials for any specific period or in any specific quantity or price.

Our future success depends on our ability to develop and successfully introduce new and enhanced products that meet the needs of our customers.

Our sales depend on our ability to anticipate our existing and prospective customers’ needs and develop products that address those needs. Our future success will depend on our ability to design new products, anticipate technological improvements and enhancements, and to develop products that are competitive in the rapidly changing computer hardware and software industry. Introduction of new products and product enhancements will require coordination of our efforts with those of our customers, suppliers, and manufacturers to develop products that offer performance features desired by our customers and performance and functionality superior or more cost effective than solutions offered by our competitors. If we fail to coordinate these efforts, develop product enhancements or introduce new products that meet the needs of our customers as scheduled, our operating results will be materially and adversely affected, and our business and prospects will be harmed. We cannot assure that product introductions will meet our anticipated release schedules or that our products will be competitive in the market. Furthermore, given the rapidly changing nature of the computer equipment market, there can be no assurance our products and technology will not be rendered obsolete by alternative or competing technologies.

Delays in our production cycle could result in outdated equipment or decreased purchases of our products.

The design and manufacture of our products can take several months to several years. The length of such process depends on the complexity and purpose of the system or equipment being designed, and may be affected by factors such as: the development and design of unique or specialized systems, the fabrication, availability, and supply of parts, the customization of parts as applicable, the manufacture and/or assembly of the units, quality control testing, and the development and incorporation of new technologies. If our products are outdated upon completion of this process our sales could materially decline and it may be necessary to sell products at a loss.

23


Unsuccessful government programs or OEM contracts could lead to reduced revenues.

We design and manufacture certain products to fit the specifications of government programs or OEM contracts. These programs may take months or years to complete and involve significant investment of our time, money and resources. We generally receive upfront fees for these programs but there is often no or little obligation on the part of our customer to purchase large volumes of products at the time of final product launch. Unsuccessful product launches could lead to reduced revenues, potential returns of products and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results. We may be forced to sell products at a loss or spend a significant amount of resources to find additional customers for these products if these programs do not fit the future needs of our intended customers.

Our inventory may rapidly become obsolete.

Sales cycles for some of our products can take several months. In addition, it can take time from the bid to the development and manufacture of the equipment. We maintain inventory based in large part on our forecasts of the volume and timing of orders. The varying length of the sales cycles makes accurate forecasting difficult. The delays inherent in our sales cycles raise the risk that the inventory we have on hand will become obsolete or impaired prior to its use or sale. If our forecasted demand does not materialize into purchase orders, we may be required to write off our inventory balances or reduce the value of our inventory, based on a reduced sales price. A write off of the inventory, or a reduction in the inventory value due to a sales price reduction, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

We offer an extended product warranty to cover defective products at no cost to the customer. An unexpected change in failure rates of our products could have a material adverse impact on our business.

We offer product warranties that generally extend for one year from date of sale that requires us to repair or replace defective products returned by the customer during the warranty period at no cost to the customer. Our product warranties are in addition to warranties we receive from our vendors. We record an estimate for anticipated warranty-related costs at the time of sale based on historical and estimated future product return rates and expected repair or replacement costs. While such costs have historically been within management’s expectations and the provisions established and we receive warranty coverage from our vendors, unexpected changes in failure rates could have a material adverse impact on our business requiring additional warranty reserves. These failures could adversely impact our operating results.

If we fail to achieve design wins for our products, our business will be harmed.

Achieving design wins is an important success factor for our business. We work closely with OEM’s and end users to insure the customer gets the product they want in the specific configuration, size and weight required for the application. We have participated in many design wins based upon our ability to interpret technical specifications and proceed rapidly through prototyping, development, and delivery. This approach and expertise is one of the factors driving our growth. Failure to maintain our expertise and ability to deliver custom, specific design systems could harm our business. In order to achieve design wins, we must:

 

anticipate the features and functionality that OEMs, customers and consumers will demand;

 

incorporate those features and functionalities into products that meet the exacting design requirements of our customers; and

 

price our products competitively.

Unanticipated changes in industry standards could render our products incompatible with products developed by major hardware manufacturers and software developers. Further, if our products are not in compliance with prevailing industry standards, our customers may not incorporate our products into their design strategies.

24


If we cannot retain, attract and motivate key personnel, we may be unable to effectively implement our business plan.

Our success depends in large part upon our ability to retain, attract and motivate highly skilled management, development, marketing, sales and service personnel. The loss of and failure to replace key technical management and personnel could adversely affect multiple development efforts. Recruitment and retention of senior management and skilled technical, sales and other personnel is very competitive, and we may not be successful in either attracting or retaining such personnel. We have lost key personnel to other high technology companies, and many larger companies with significantly greater resources than us have aggressively recruited, and continue to aggressively recruit, key personnel. As part of our strategy to attract and retain key personnel, we may offer equity compensation through grants of stock options, restricted stock awards or restricted stock units. Potential employees, however, may not perceive our equity incentives as attractive enough. In addition, due to the intense competition for qualified employees, we may be required to, and have had to, increase the level of compensation paid to existing and new employees, which could materially increase our operating expenses.

We have made in the past, and may make in the future, acquisitions which could require significant management attention, disrupt our business, result in dilution to our stockholders, deplete our cash reserves and adversely affect our financial results.

Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the following:

 

difficulties in successfully integrating the operations, systems, technologies, products, offerings and personnel of the acquired company or companies;

 

insufficient revenue to offset increased expenses associated with acquisitions;

 

diversion of management’s attention from normal daily operations of the business and the challenges of managing larger and more widespread operations resulting from acquisitions;

 

potential difficulties in completing projects associated with in-process research and development intangibles;

 

difficulties in entering markets in which we have no or limited direct prior experience and where competitors in such markets have stronger market positions;

 

initial dependence on unfamiliar supply chains or relatively small supply partners; and

 

the potential loss of key employees, customers, distributors, vendors and other business partners of the companies we acquire following and continuing after announcement of acquisition plans.

Acquisitions may also cause us to:

 

use a substantial portion of our cash reserves or incur debt;

 

issue equity securities or grant equity incentives to acquired employees that would dilute our current stockholders’ percentage ownership;

 

assume liabilities, including potentially unknown liabilities;

 

record goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets that are subject to impairment testing on a regular basis and potential periodic impairment charges;

 

incur amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets;

 

incur large and immediate write-offs and restructuring and other related expenses; or

 

become subject to intellectual property litigation or other litigation.

Acquisitions of high-technology companies and assets are inherently risky and subject to many factors outside of our control and no assurance can be given that our recently completed or future acquisitions will be successful and will not materially adversely affect our business, operating results, or financial condition. Failure to manage and successfully integrate acquisitions could materially harm our business and operating results.

25


The continuing commoditization of HPC hardware and software has resulted in increased pricing pressure and may adversely affect our operating results.

The continuing commoditization of HPC hardware, such as processors, interconnects, flash storage and other infrastructure, and the growing commoditization of software, including plentiful building blocks and more capable open source software, as well as the potential for integration of differentiated technology into already-commoditized components, has resulted in, and may result in increased pricing pressure that may cause us to reduce our pricing in order to remain competitive, which can negatively impact our gross margins and adversely affect our operating results.

Our election to not opt out of the extended accounting transition period under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, may make our financial statements difficult to compare to other companies.

Under the JOBS Act, as an emerging growth company, we can elect to opt out of the extended transition period for any new or revised accounting standards that may be issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period. This means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, are permitted to use any extended transition period for adoption that is provided in the new or revised accounting standard having different application dates for public and private companies. This may make the comparison of our financial statements with any other public company, which is not either an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period, difficult or impossible as possible different or revised standards may be used.

If we are unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, the accuracy and timeliness of our financial reporting may be adversely affected. In addition, because of our status as an emerging growth company, you will not be able to depend on any attestation from our independent registered public accounting firm as to our internal control over financial reporting for the foreseeable future.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we assess disclosure controls and procedures and controls over financial reporting. In particular, we are required to perform system and process evaluations and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We are required to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting beginning with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. However, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act until the date we are no longer an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. Accordingly, you will not be able to depend on any attestation concerning our internal control over financial reporting from our independent registered public accounting firm for the foreseeable future.

Risks Relating to Intellectual Property

If we are unable to protect our proprietary design and intellectual property rights, our competitive position could be harmed or we could be required to incur significant expenses to enforce our rights.

Our ability to compete effectively is dependent in part upon our ability to protect our proprietary technology. We rely on patents, trademarks, trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements to protect our intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance these protections will be available in all cases or will be adequate to prevent our competitors from copying, reverse engineering or otherwise obtaining and using our technology, proprietary rights or products. For example, the laws of certain countries in which our products are manufactured or licensed do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. In addition, third parties may seek to challenge, invalidate or circumvent our patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets, or applications for any of the foregoing. There can be no assurance that our competitors will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology or design around our proprietary rights. In each case, our ability to compete could be significantly impaired. To prevent substantial unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights, it may be necessary to prosecute actions for infringement and/or

26


misappropriation of our trade secrets and/or proprietary rights against third parties. Any such action could result in significant costs and diversion of our resources and management’s attention, and there can be no assurance we will be successful in such action. Furthermore, many of our current and potential competitors have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to enforce their intellectual property rights than we do. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating our trade secrets and/or intellectual property.

Many of our proprietary designs are in digital form and the breach of our computer systems could result in these designs being stolen.

If our cybersecurity measures are breached or unauthorized access to private or proprietary data is otherwise obtained, our proprietary designs could be stolen. Because we hold many of these designs in digital form on our servers, there exists an inherent risk that an unauthorized third party could conduct a cybersecurity breach resulting in the theft of our proprietary information. While we have taken cybersecurity steps to protect our proprietary information, because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not identified until they are launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Any or all of these issues could negatively impact our competitive edge and our ability to obtain new customers thereby adversely affecting our financial results.

Our proprietary designs are susceptible to reverse engineering by our competitors.

Much of the value of our proprietary rights is derived from our vast library of design specifications. While we consider our design specifications to be protected by various proprietary, trade secret and intellectual property laws, such information is susceptible to reverse engineering by our competitors. We may not be able to prevent our competitors from developing competing design specifications and the cost of enforcing these rights may be significant. If we are unable to adequately protect our proprietary designs our financial condition and operating results could suffer.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.

We consider trade secrets, including confidential and unpatented know-how and designs important to the maintenance of our competitive position. We protect trade secrets and confidential and unpatented know-how, in part, by customarily entering into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to such knowledge, such as our employees, outside technical and commercial collaborators, consultants, advisors and other third parties. We also enter into confidentiality and invention or patent assignment agreements with our employees and consultants that obligate them to maintain confidentiality and assign their inventions to us. Despite these efforts, any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches.

Claims by others that we infringe their intellectual property or trade secret rights could harm our business.

Our industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights, which has resulted in protracted and expensive litigation for many companies. Third parties may in the future assert claims of infringement of intellectual property rights against us or against our customers or channel partners for which we may be liable. As the number of products and competitors in our market increases and overlaps occur, infringement claims may increase.

Intellectual property or trade secret claims against us, and any resulting lawsuits, may result in our incurring significant expenses and could subject us to significant liability for damages and invalidate what we currently believe are our proprietary rights. Our involvement in any patent dispute or other intellectual property dispute or action to protect trade secrets and know-how could have a material adverse effect on our business. Adverse determinations in any litigation could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties, require us to seek licenses from third parties and prevent us from manufacturing and selling our products. Any of these situations could have a material adverse effect on our business. These claims, regardless of their merits or outcome, would likely be time consuming and expensive to resolve and could divert management’s time and attention.

27


We are generally obligated to indemnify our channel partners and end-customers for certain expenses and liabilities resulting from intellectual property infringement claims regarding our products, which could force us to incur substantial costs.

We have agreed, and expect to continue to agree, to indemnify our channel partners and end-customers for certain intellectual property infringement claims regarding our products. As a result, in the case of infringement claims against these channel partners and end-customers, we could be required to indemnify them for losses resulting from such claims or to refund amounts they have paid to us. Our channel partners and other end-customers in the future may seek indemnification from us in connection with infringement claims brought.

Risks Related to Our International Operations

Our international sales and operations subject us to additional risks that can adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

Our international operations subject us to a variety of risks and challenges, including: exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, increased management, travel, infrastructure and legal compliance costs associated with having international operations; reliance on channel partners; increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and complexities; compliance with foreign laws and regulations; compliance with U.S. laws and regulations for foreign operations; and reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries and practical difficulties of enforcing rights abroad. Any of these risks could adversely affect our international operations, reduce our international sales or increase our operating costs, adversely affecting our business, operating results and financial condition and growth prospects.

We are subject to governmental export and import controls that could impair our ability to compete in international markets due to licensing requirements and subject us to liability if we are not in compliance with applicable laws.

Our products are subject to export control and import laws and regulations, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, U.S. Customs regulations and various economic and trade sanctions regulations administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Controls. Exports of our products must be made in compliance with these laws and regulations. If we violate these laws and regulations, we and certain of our employees could be subject to substantial civil or criminal penalties, including the possible loss of export or import privileges, fines, which may be imposed on us and responsible employees or managers and, in extreme cases, the incarceration of responsible employees or managers. In addition, if our channel partners, agents or consultants fail to obtain appropriate import, export or re-export licenses or authorizations, we may also be adversely affected through reputational harm and penalties. Obtaining the necessary authorizations, including any required license, for a particular sale may be time-consuming, is not guaranteed and may result in the delay or loss of sales opportunities. Changes in our products or changes in applicable export or import laws and regulations may also create delays in the introduction and sale of our products in international markets, prevent our end-customers with international operations from deploying our products or, in some cases, prevent the export or import of our products to certain countries, governments or persons altogether. Any change in export or import laws and regulations, shift in the enforcement or scope of existing laws and regulations, or change in the countries, governments, persons or technologies targeted by such laws and regulations, could also result in decreased use of our products, or in our decreased ability to export or sell our products to existing or potential end-customers with international operations. Any decreased use of our products or limitation on our ability to export or sell our products would likely adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

28


New regulations or standards or changes in existing regulations or standards in the United States or internationally related to our suppliers products may result in unanticipated costs or liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and future sales, and could place additional burdens on the operations of our business.

Our suppliers’ products are subject to governmental regulations in many jurisdictions. To achieve and maintain market acceptance, our suppliers’ products must continue to comply with these regulations and many industry standards. As these regulations and standards evolve, and if new regulations or standards are implemented, our suppliers may have to modify their products. The failure of their products to comply, or delays in compliance, with the existing and evolving industry regulations and standards could prevent or delay introduction of our products, which could harm our business. Supplier uncertainty regarding future policies may also affect demand for HPC products, including our products. Moreover, channel partners or customers may require us, or we may otherwise deem it necessary or advisable, to alter our products to address actual or anticipated changes in the regulatory environment. Our inability to alter our products to address these requirements and any regulatory changes may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.

We have international operations. The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-bribery laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Practices in the local business communities of many countries outside the United States have a level of government corruption that is greater than that found in the developed world. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws and we have established policies and procedures designed to monitor compliance with these anti-bribery law requirements; however, we cannot assure that our policies and procedures will protect us from potential reckless or criminal acts committed by individual employees or agents. If we are found to be liable for anti-bribery law violations, we could suffer from criminal or civil penalties or other sanctions that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

The price of our common stock may be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

The trading price of our common stock following our initial public offering may fluctuate substantially and may be higher or lower than the initial public offering price. The trading price of our common stock will depend on several factors, including those described in this “Risk Factors” section, many of which are beyond our control and may not be related to our operating performance. These fluctuations could cause you to lose all or part of your investment in our common stock since you might be unable to sell your shares at or above the price you paid.  Factors that could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock include:

 

price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;

 

volatility in the market prices and trading volumes of technology stocks;

 

changes in operating performance and stock market valuations of other technology companies generally, or those in our industry in particular;

 

sales of shares of our common stock by us or our stockholders;

 

failure of financial analysts to maintain coverage of us, changes in financial estimates by any analysts who follow our company, or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors;

 

the financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in those projections or our failure to meet those projections;

 

announcements by us or our competitors of new products or new or terminated significant contracts, commercial relationships or capital commitments;

 

the public’s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements and filings with the SEC;

29


 

rumors and market speculation involving us or other companies in our industry;

 

actual or anticipated changes in our operating results or fluctuations in our operating results;

 

actual or anticipated developments in our business or our competitors’ businesses or the competitive landscape generally;

 

litigation involving us, our industry or both or investigations by regulators into our operations or those of our competitors;

 

developments or disputes concerning our intellectual property or other proprietary rights;

 

announced or completed acquisitions of businesses or technologies by us or our competitors;

 

new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business;

 

changes in accounting standards, policies, guidelines, interpretations or principles;

 

any major change in our management;

 

general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of our markets; and

 

other events or factors, including those resulting from war, incidents of terrorism or responses to these events.

In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. Broad market and industry factors, as well as general economic, political and market conditions such as recessions or interest rate changes, may seriously affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. These fluctuations may be even more pronounced in the trading market for our stock shortly following our initial public offering. If the market price of our common stock after our initial public offering does not exceed the initial public offering price, you may not realize any return on your investment in us and may lose some or all of your investment.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market prices of particular companies’ securities, securities class action litigations have often been instituted against these companies. Litigation of this type, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources. Any adverse determination in any such litigation or any amounts paid to settle any such actual or threatened litigation could require that we make significant payments.

Our directors and principal stockholders own a significant percentage of our stock and will be able to exert significant control over matters subject to stockholder approval.

Our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders have substantial control over the Company and could delay or prevent a change in corporate control. Our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 5% of our common stock, together with their affiliates, beneficially own, in the aggregate, 37.8% of our outstanding common stock, based on the number of shares outstanding as of February 28, 2019. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, would have the ability to control the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, these stockholders, acting together, would have the ability to control the management and affairs of our company. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership might adversely affect the market price of our common stock by:

 

delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company;

 

impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover, or other business combination involving us; or

 

discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of the company.

30


If securities or industry analysts issue an adverse opinion regarding our stock or do not publish research or reports about our company, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that equity research analysts publish about us and our business. We anticipate having limited analyst coverage and we may continue to have inadequate analyst coverage in the future. Even if we obtain adequate analyst coverage, we would have no control over such analysts or the content and opinions in their reports. Securities analysts may elect not to provide research coverage of our company and such lack of research coverage may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. The price of our common stock could also decline if one or more equity research analysts downgrade our common stock or if those analysts issue other unfavorable commentary or cease publishing reports about us or our business. If one or more equity research analysts cease coverage of our company, we could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.

Substantial future sales of shares of our common stock could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

The market price of shares of our common stock could decline as a result of substantial sales of our common stock, particularly sales by our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders, a large number of shares of our common stock becoming available for sale or the perception in the market that holders of a large number of shares intend to sell their shares. As of February 28, 2019, we have 14,270,268 shares of our common stock outstanding. This includes the shares issued in our initial public offering, which may be resold in the public market immediately without restriction.

Moreover, certain holders of our common stock will have rights, subject to some conditions, to require us to file registration statements covering their shares or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or our stockholders. Substantially all of these shares are subject to lock-up agreements restricting their sale for a period of one to two years depending on the terms of the agreement.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management and limit the market price of our common stock.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. Some of these provisions:

 

authorize our board of directors to issue, without further action by the stockholders, up to 10,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock and up to 50,000,000 shares of authorized common stock;

 

require that any action to be taken by our stockholders be affected at a duly called annual or special meeting and not by written consent;

 

specify that special meetings of our stockholders can be called only by our board of directors, the chairman of the board of directors, the chief executive officer or the president;

 

establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder approvals to be brought before an annual meeting of our stockholders, including proposed nominations of persons for election to our board of directors;

 

provide that our directors may be removed only for cause; and;

 

provide that vacancies on our board of directors may, except as otherwise required by law, be filled only by a majority of directors then in office, even if less than a quorum.

31


In addition, we are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which limits the ability of stockholders owning in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock to merge or combine with us. Furthermore, our certificate of incorporation specifies that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for most legal actions involving actions brought against us by stockholders. We believe this provision benefits us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law by chancellors particularly experienced in resolving corporate disputes, efficient administration of cases on a more expedited schedule relative to other forums and protection against the burdens of multi-forum litigation. However, the provision may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against our directors and officers. The enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies’ certificates of incorporation has been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that, in connection with any applicable action brought against us, a court could find the choice of forum provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in such action.

These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions in our certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws make it more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to obtain control of our board of directors or initiate actions that are opposed by the then-current board of directors and could also delay or impede a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving our company. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing or cause us to take other corporate actions you desire. Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction or changes in our board of directors could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

We have never paid cash dividends on our capital stock, and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, our loan and security agreement with Bank of the West restricts our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock without the prior written consent of Bank of the West, and we may also enter into credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements in the future that will restrict our ability to declare or pay cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to fund the growth of our business. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, general business conditions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

If an active, liquid trading market for our common stock does not develop, you may not be able to sell your shares quickly or at or above the initial offering price.

There has not been a public market for our common stock prior to our initial public offering. An active and liquid trading market for our common stock may not develop or be sustained following our initial public offering. Given the small size of our initial public offering, it may take some time for an active market to develop. The lack of an active market may impair your ability to sell your shares at the time you wish to sell them or at a price that you consider reasonable. The lack of an active market may also reduce the fair market value of your shares. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital to continue to fund operations by selling shares and may impair our ability to acquire other companies or technologies by using our shares as consideration. You may not be able to sell your shares quickly or at or above the initial offering price. The initial public offering price was determined by negotiations with the representatives of the underwriters. This price may not be indicative of the price at which our common stock will continue to trade in the future, and our common stock could trade below the initial public offering price.

32


Our inability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms in the future may limit our ability to develop and commercialize new solutions and technologies and expand our operations.

If our available cash balances, net proceeds from our initial public offering and anticipated cash flow from operations are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, due to lower demand for our products as a result of other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section, we may seek to raise additional capital through equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations or licensing arrangements. We may also consider raising additional capital in the future to expand our business, pursue strategic investments, take advantage of financing opportunities, or other reasons.

Additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. If we raise funds by issuing equity securities, dilution to our stockholders could result. Any equity securities issued also may provide for rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock. The terms of debt securities issued or borrowings could impose significant restrictions on our operations. The incurrence of indebtedness or the issuance of certain equity securities could result in increased fixed payment obligations and could also result in restrictive covenants, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt or issue additional equity, limitations on our ability to acquire or license intellectual property rights, and other operating restrictions that could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business. In addition, the issuance of additional equity securities by us, or the possibility of such issuance, may cause the market price of our common stock to decline. If we do not have, or are not able to obtain, sufficient funds, we may have to delay development or commercialization of our products or license to third parties the rights to commercialize products or technologies that we would otherwise seek to commercialize. If we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements with third parties, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our technologies or our products, or to grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If we are unable to raise adequate funds, we may have to liquidate some or all of our assets, or delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate some or all of our development programs. We also may have to reduce marketing, customer support or other resources devoted to our products or cease operations. Any of these actions could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

We are an “emerging growth company” and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may choose to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies but not to emerging growth companies, which includes, among other things:

 

exemption from the auditor attestation requirements under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;

 

reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements; and

 

exemption from the requirements of holding non-binding stockholder votes on executive compensation arrangements.

We could be an emerging growth company until the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary after our initial public offering, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more, (ii) the date on which we have, during the previous three year period, issued more than $1.07 billion in non-convertible debt or (iii) the date on which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer under the federal securities laws. We will qualify as a large accelerated filer as of the first day of the first fiscal year after we have (i) more than $700 million in outstanding common equity held by our non-affiliates and (ii) been public for at least 12 months. The value of our outstanding common equity will be measured each year on the last day of our second fiscal quarter.

We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive if we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

33


We will incur significant increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to comply with the laws and regulations affecting public companies, particularly after we are no longer an emerging growth company.

We have limited experience operating as a public company. As a public company, particularly after we cease to qualify as an emerging growth company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company, including costs associated with public company reporting and corporate governance requirements, to comply with the rules and regulations imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act, as well as rules implemented by the SEC and Nasdaq. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives and our legal and accounting compliance costs will increase. It is likely that we will need to hire additional staff or devote additional financial and other resources in the areas of investor relations, legal and accounting to operate as a public company. We also expect these new rules and regulations may make it more difficult and expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers. We are evaluating and monitoring developments regarding these rules, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we assess the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In particular, as a public company, we will be required to perform system and process evaluations and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As described above, as an emerging growth company, we will not need to comply with the auditor attestation provisions of Section 404(b) for several years. Our testing, or the subsequent testing by our independent registered public accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses. Our compliance with Section 404 will require that we incur substantial accounting expense and management time on compliance-related issues. Moreover, if we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, or if we or our independent registered public accounting firm identify deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could cause our stock price to decline.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

Our corporate headquarters are in a leased space comprising approximately 24,032 square feet in Escondido, California under a lease that was renewed in August 2018 and now expires in August 2024.  We also lease a 3,208 square foot facility in Salt Lake City, Utah that houses our Ion software development team that expires in August 2020. CDI is the lessee of approximately 12,000 square feet located in Irvine, California with the lease expiring in June 2021.  Bressner Technology, which was acquired in October 2018, leases space comprising 8,073 square feet which lease expires in December 2019.  

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are subject to litigation, claims, investigations and audits arising from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. However, at this time, we are not aware of any material pending, threatened or unasserted claims.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not Applicable.

34


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information

Our common stock par value $0.0001, has been publicly traded on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “OSS” since our initial public offering on February 1, 2018, which was completed at an offering price to the public of $5.00 per share.  Prior to our initial public offering, there was no public market for our common stock.  Due to the fact that our common stock has only been traded on a public market since February 1, 2018, we have only set forth quarterly information with respect to the high and low sale prices for our common stock for such time period.

 

Year ended December 31, 2019

 

High

 

 

Low

 

First  Quarter (through March 8, 2019)

 

$

2.85

 

 

$

1.87

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2018

 

High

 

 

Low

 

First Quarter (beginning February 1, 2018)

 

$

6.25

 

 

$

4.40

 

Second Quarter

 

$

5.00

 

 

$

4.10

 

Third Quarter

 

$

4.75

 

 

$

3.20

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

3.99

 

 

$

1.81

 

 

Holders

As of February 28, 2019, there were 14,270,268 shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 64 holders of record of our common stock.  This number was derived from our stockholder records and does not include beneficial holders of our common stock whose shares are held in “street name” with various dealers, clearing agencies, banks, brokers and other fiduciaries.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.  We may enter into credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements in the future that will restrict our ability to declare or pay cash dividends on our common stock. Any future determination to declare dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, general business conditions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

See Part III, Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

None.

Use of Proceeds

On December 18, 2017, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 with the SEC related to a firm commitment underwritten initial public offering of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.

35


On January 31, 2018, our registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-222121) was declared effective by the SEC for our initial public offering. At the closing of the offering on February 5, 2018, we sold 3,800,000 shares of common stock at an initial public offering price of $5.00 per share and received gross proceeds of $19,000,000, which resulted in net proceeds to us of $17,485,000, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $1,330,000 and underwriter offering-related transaction costs of $185,000. None of the expenses associated with the initial public offering were paid to directors, officers, persons owning ten percent (10%) or more of any class of equity securities, or to their associates, or to our affiliates. Roth Capital Partners, LLC, acted as sole book-running managers for the offering and The Benchmark Company, LLC acted as co-manager.

The Company commenced trading on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “OSS” on February 1, 2018.

On February 1, 2018, in connection with the completion of its initial public offering, the Company filed its amended and restated certificate of incorporation with the Secretary of the State of Delaware whereby it increased its authorized common stock to 50,000,000 shares and authorized preferred stock to 10,000,000 shares.

On February 1, 2018, the Company issued warrants to purchase 380,000 shares of common stock at a price of $6.00 per share to Roth Capital Partners LLC.

On February 5, 2018, the Company paid down the outstanding balance of the line of credit which had an outstanding balance of $2,758,517.

On February 9, 2018, the underwriter partially exercised their over-allotment option to purchase an additional 200,000 shares of common stock of which 100,000 were newly issued by the Company and 100,000 were sold by our CEO Steve Cooper, as selling stockholder, at the public offering price of $5.00 per share. The Company received gross proceeds of $500,000 for its portion of the over-allotment, which resulted in net proceeds to us of $465,000, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $35,000.

On February 15, 2018, the Company paid-off the remaining balances of the related party notes payable in the amount of $152,973.

On February 15, 2018, the Company paid-off the remaining balance of the “July 2016 Note” in the amount of $109,267.

On February 23, 2018, the Company paid-off the remaining balance of the Bank of the West term loan in the amount of $834,103.

On March 2, 2018, the Company cancelled its line of credit with Bank of the West.

On August 31, 2018, the Company acquired Concept Development Inc., and utilized cash of approximately $891,787, inclusive of acquisition and working capital requirements.

On October 31, 2018, the Company acquired Bressner Technology GmbH and utilized cash of approximately $5,794,000, inclusive of acquisition costs.

There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our initial public offering as described in our final prospectus filed with the SEC on February 1, 2018, pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4).

Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities

None.

36


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The following tables set forth a summary of our historical financial data as of, and for the periods ended on, the dates indicated. We have derived the statements of operations and balance sheet data for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Our historical results for any prior period are not indicative of our future results.

 

 

 

For The Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net revenue

 

$

37,027,382

 

 

$

27,538,333

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

25,692,658

 

 

 

18,873,797

 

Gross margin

 

 

11,334,724

 

 

 

8,664,536

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative

 

 

6,513,298

 

 

 

3,502,998

 

Marketing and selling

 

 

3,995,258

 

 

 

2,924,727

 

Research and development

 

 

4,001,757

 

 

 

2,687,249

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

14,510,313

 

 

 

9,114,974

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(3,175,589

)

 

 

(450,438

)

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

(65,693

)

 

 

(199,257

)

Other, net

 

 

271,878

 

 

 

30,440

 

Total other income (expense), net

 

 

206,185

 

 

 

(168,817

)

Loss before benefit from income taxes

 

 

(2,969,404

)

 

 

(619,255

)

Benefit for income taxes

 

 

(1,396,784

)

 

 

(402,717

)

Net loss

 

$

(1,572,620

)

 

$

(216,538

)

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

$

(436,342

)

 

$

(313,158

)

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders

 

$

(1,136,278

)

 

$

96,620

 

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

2,272,256

 

 

$

185,717

 

Other working capital accounts

 

 

8,810,952

 

 

 

(81,992

)

Total working capital

 

$

11,083,208

 

 

$

103,725

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

$

265,038

 

 

$

347,963

 

Preferred stock

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,416,527

 

Common stock

 

 

1,422

 

 

 

551

 

Noncontrolling interest

 

 

500

 

 

 

436,842

 

Additional paid in capital

 

 

27,424,113

 

 

 

3,484,428

 

Retained (deficit) earnings

 

 

(854,855

)

 

 

281,423

 

Total long-term debt and stockholders' equity

 

$

26,836,218

 

 

$

6,967,734

 

 

37


ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS .

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and operating results together with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements based upon current beliefs, plans and expectations that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” or in other parts of this Annual Report.

Overview

OSS designs, manufactures and markets custom high speed computing systems for high performance computing (HPC) applications. These applications require ultra-fast processing power and the ability to quickly access and store ever-growing data sets.  Systems are built using the latest GPU (graphical processing unit) and solid-state flash (memory) technologies.  We are a niche provider of HPC custom servers, compute accelerators, and flash storage arrays.  We deliver this technology to customers through sale of equipment and software to customers.  Concept Development Inc., (CDI) which was acquired on August 31, 2018, specializes in the design and manufacture of specialized high-performance in-flight entertainment systems for commercial aircraft.  CDI’s capabilities include electrical, mechanical and software design as well as extensive experience in test and certifications required for airborne systems. Bressner Technology GmbH, (Bressner) which was acquired on October 31, 2018, provides standard and customized servers, panel PCs, and PCIe expansion systems. Bressner provides manufacturing, test, sales and marketing services for customers throughout Europe.

Business Developments

On July 15, 2016, we acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of Mission Technology Group, Inc. (“Magma”). Magma designs, manufactures, and markets industrial grade computer systems and components and is located in Southern California.

On April 6, 2017, we formed SkyScale, LLC (“SkyScale”), a High-Performance Computing as a Service (HPCaaS) provider to offer customers world-class, ultra-fast, multi-GPU hardware platforms in the cloud.  SkyScale is jointly owned with Jacoma Investments, LLC, an entity controlled by our board member Jack Harrison.  In accordance with the terms of the operating agreement, Jacoma Investments, LLC agreed to contribute $750,000 in capital and we agreed to contribute $750,000 in the form of credits to purchase equipment, personnel or support services. Each of us received a 50% membership interest.

On May 9, 2017, we entered into an agreement to acquire the source code license to the Ion flash array software from Western Digital.  We plan to continue to develop and sell Ion software with our high-density storage arrays, as well as servicing existing Western Digital software users.  OSS Ion software works with our all-flash storage systems, and provides them with a critical point of differentiation with respect to speed and throughput.  The OSS Ion software leverages flash storage and open server hardware to accelerate applications and SAN performance through sharing or clustering high-speed all-flash storage arrays.  The software supports many major OEM servers and provides an intuitive interface for system users to manage its many features.  Having the Ion software source code and engineering team on-board allows us to strategically grow our all-flash storage business in the many Big Data and HPC markets going forward.

On July 1, 2017, we entered in to a Service Agreement with Western Digital to service their existing customer base that utilizes Ion flash storage software.  Additionally, we purchased certain equipment from Western Digital and hired selected employees to assist in the servicing of these existing customers.  

On August 1, 2017, we received a three month extension on our line of credit with no modification in terms.

On October 5, 2017, we received a renewal and modification on our line of credit that extends the line through August 31, 2018, and increases the borrowing capacity limit from $ 3.0 million to $3.5 million.

38


On November 9, 2017, we submitted a confidential draft registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC in connection with a proposed initial public offering of our common stock.  

On December 14, 2017, the Company was reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in connection with our initial public offering.  

On December 18, 2017, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 with the SEC related to a firm commitment underwritten initial public offering of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. The initial public offering was declared effective by the SEC on January 31, 2018.  The Company commenced trading on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “OSS” on February 1, 2018.  On February 5, 2018, the Company closed the initial public offering selling an aggregate of 3,800,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $5.00 for total gross proceeds to the Company of $19,000,000, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of approximately $1,330,000 and underwriter offering-related transaction costs of $185,000, the Company received net proceeds of $17,485,000.

On February 1, 2018, the Company issued warrants to purchase 380,000 shares of common stock at a price of $6.00 to Roth Capital Partners LLC.

On February 2, 2018, in connection with the completion of its initial public offering, the Company filed its amended and restated certificate incorporation with the Secretary of the State of Delaware whereby it increased its authorized common shares to 50,000,000 shares and authorized preferred stock to 10,000,000 shares.

On February 5, 2018, the Company paid down the outstanding balance of the line of credit which had an outstanding balance of $2,758,517.

On February 9, 2018, the underwriters exercised their over-allotment option to purchase an additional 200,000 shares of common stock at the public offering price of $5.00 per share of which 100,000 newly issued shares of common stock were purchased directly from the Company and 100,000 shares were sold by our CEO’s family trust as selling stockholder.  The Company received gross proceeds of $500,000, which resulted in net proceeds of $465,000 to the Company, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $35,000.

On February 15, 2018, the Company paid-off the remaining balances of the related party notes payable in the amount of $152,973.

On February 15, 2018, the Company paid-off the remaining balance of the “July 2016 Note” in the amount of $109,267.

On February 23, 2018, the Company paid-off the remaining balance of the Bank of the West term loan in the amount of $834,103.

On March 2, 2018, the Company cancelled its line of credit with Bank of the West.

On August 31, 2018, the Company acquired Concept Development Inc. (CDI) located in Irvine, California for cash of $646,759, and common stock of $4,194,673 (Note 3).  CDI specializes in the design and manufacture of custom high-performance computing systems for airborne in-flight entertainment systems.  The operating results for CDI for the months of September 2018 through December 2018 are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

On October 3, 2018, the Company filed a Form S-8 relating to the 3,432,525 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share issuable to the employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors of the Company under the Company’s 2017 Plan, 2015 Plan, 2011 Plan, and 2000 Plan.

39


On October 31, 2018, the Company’s wholly-owned German subsidiary, OSS GmbH, acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Bressner Technology GmbH, a Germany limited liability company located near Munich, Germany, from its principal owners for cash consideration of €4,725,000 (US$5,374,582) and stock consideration of 106,463 newly-issued restricted shares of the Company’s common stock.   The operating results for Bressner for the months of November 2018 and December 2018 are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

On December 31, 2018, as a result of changes in the competitive landscape and downward pressure on pricing from large competitors, the members to the joint venture agreement agreed to begin the dissolution of SkyScale.

Our Business Model

OSS designs, manufactures and sells specialized high performance computing (HPC) systems to customers world-wide.  We differentiate ourselves from other suppliers of HPC solutions by utilizing our expertise in custom systems design and PCIe expansion to build systems with a greater quantity of PCIe add-in slots, GPU-based compute cards and/or flash cards. Our systems offer industry leading capabilities that occupy less physical space and power consumption.

Components of Results of Operations

Revenue

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605.  Accordingly, revenue from the sale of products is recognized when there is evidence of an arrangement, the selling price is fixed or determinable, title and risk of loss has transferred to the customer, any installation or service obligations have been satisfied, and collection is reasonably assured. Net revenue includes deductions for customer discounts and actual and estimated returns. All amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling are classified as net sales.

Customer agreements include one vendor managed inventory program.  Pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13.A.3.a , the Company recognizes revenue under this arrangement when (i) risks of ownership have passed to the customer; (ii)  the customer's  commitment to purchase the goods is fixed ; (iii) there is a fixed schedule for delivery of the goods that is reasonable and consistent with the customer ' s  business purpose ; (iv) the Company  does not have any specific performance obligations such that the earning process  is not complete;  (v) the ordered goods have been segregated  from the Company ' s inventory and are not subject to being used to fill other orders; and (vi) the product  is complete  and ready  for  shipment.  Also , such arrangement must be requested by the customer and the customer has explained a substantial business purpose for the arrangement.  Management also considers whether the customer ' s custodial risks are insured and whether modifications to the Company ' s normal billing and credit terms were required.

 

Revenues on certain fixed-price contracts where we provide engineering services, prototypes and completed products are recognized over the contract term based on the percentage of completion or based upon milestones delivered that are provided during the period and compared to the total estimated development and milestone goals to be provided over the entire contract. These services require that we perform significant, extensive and complex design, development, modification or implementation of our customers’ systems. Performance will often extend over long periods of time, and our right to receive future payment depends on our future performance in accordance with the agreement

 

The percentage-of-completion methodology involves recognizing probable and reasonably estimable revenue using the percentage of services completed, on a current cumulative cost to estimated total cost basis, using a reasonably consistent profit margin over the period. Due to the long-term nature of these projects, developing the estimates of costs often requires significant judgment. Factors that must be considered in estimating the progress of work completed and ultimate cost of the projects include, but are not limited to, the availability of labor and labor productivity, the nature and complexity of the work to be performed and the impact of delayed performance. If changes occur in delivery, productivity or other factors used in developing the estimates of costs or revenues, we revise our cost and revenue estimates, which may result in increases or decreases in revenues and costs, and such revisions are reflected in earnings in the period in which the revision becomes known.

 

40


Products are typically shipped directly to our customers, or in some cases to our international distributors.  These international distributors assist with import regulations, currency conversions and local language, but do not stock our inventory.  Our product revenues vary from period to period based on, among other things, the customer orders received and our ability to produce and deliver the ordered products. Customers often specify requested delivery dates that coincide with their need for our products.

Because these customers may use our products in connection with a variety of projects of different sizes and durations, a customer’s orders for one reporting period generally do not indicate a trend for future orders by that customer. Additionally, order patterns do not necessarily correlate amongst customers and, therefore, we generally cannot identify seasonal trends.  

In 2017, we began offering support services which may involve providing customer phone support, system debug and software upgrades for a period of time. We recognize revenue from support services ratably over the contractual service period.

Cost of revenue

Cost of revenue primarily consists of costs of materials, costs paid to third-party contract manufacturers (which may include the costs of components), and personnel costs associated with manufacturing and support operations. Personnel costs consist of wages, bonuses, benefits, stock-based compensation expenses. Cost of revenue also includes freight, allocated overhead costs and inventory write-offs and changes to our inventory and warranty reserves. Allocated overhead costs consist of certain facilities and utility costs. We expect cost of revenue to increase in absolute dollars, as product revenue increases.

Operating expenses

Our operating expenses consist of general and administrative, sales and marketing and research and development expenses. Salaries and personnel-related costs, benefits, and stock-based compensation expense, are the most significant components of each category of operating expenses. Operating expenses also include allocated overhead costs for facilities and utility costs.

General and Administrative - General and administrative expense consists primarily of employee compensation and related expenses for administrative functions including finance, legal, human resources and fees for third-party professional services, as well as allocated overhead. For 2018, general and administrative expenses include the costs related to the dissolution of SkyScale, LLC.  We expect our general and administrative expense to increase in absolute dollars as we continue to invest in growing the business.

Sales and Marketing - Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of employee compensation and related expenses, sales commissions, marketing programs, travel and entertainment expenses as well as allocated overhead. Marketing programs consist of advertising, tradeshows, events, corporate communications and brand-building activities. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in absolute dollars as we expand our sales force, increase marketing resources, and further develop sales channels.

Research and Development - Research and development expense consists primarily of employee compensation and related expenses, prototype expenses, depreciation associated with assets acquired for research and development, third-party engineering and contractor support costs, as well as allocated overhead. We expect our research and development expenses to increase in absolute dollars as we continue to invest in new and existing products.

Other Income (Expense), net

Other income consists of income received for activities outside of our core business.  In 2017, this includes rental income received through the sub-leasing of certain facility space.  Other expense includes expenses for activities outside of our core business.  These expenses consist primarily of loan amortization and interest expense.

41


Provision for Income Taxes

Provision for income taxes consists of estimated income taxes due to the United States and German governments and to the state tax authorities in jurisdictions in which we conduct business, as well as the change in our deferred income tax assets and liabilities.

Results of Operations

Results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 include Magma, SkyScale, which began operations in April 2017, the purchase of the Ion business from Western Digital on July 1, 2017, Concept Development Inc., which was acquired on August 31, 2018, and Bressner Technology GmbH, which was acquired on October 31, 2018.

Accordingly, the periods presented below are not directly comparable.  After the completion of four quarters, these businesses for both revenue and expense reporting will be treated as organic operating activity for current and comparable historical periods.  The following tables set forth our results of continued operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 respectively, presented in dollars and as percentage of net revenue.

The following tables set forth our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 respectively, presented in dollars and as a percentage of net revenue.

 

 

 

For The Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net revenue

 

$

37,027,382

 

 

$

27,538,333

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

25,692,658

 

 

 

18,873,797

 

Gross margin

 

 

11,334,724

 

 

 

8,664,536

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative

 

 

6,513,298

 

 

 

3,502,998

 

Marketing and selling

 

 

3,995,258

 

 

 

2,924,727

 

Research and development

 

 

4,001,757

 

 

 

2,687,249

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

14,510,313

 

 

 

9,114,974

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(3,175,589

)

 

 

(450,438

)

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

(65,693

)

 

 

(199,257

)

Other, net

 

 

271,878

 

 

 

30,440

 

Total other income (expense), net

 

 

206,185

 

 

 

(168,817

)

Loss before benefit from income taxes

 

 

(2,969,404

)

 

 

(619,255

)

Benefit for income taxes

 

 

(1,396,784

)

 

 

(402,717

)

Net loss

 

$

(1,572,620

)

 

$

(216,538

)

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

$

(436,342

)

 

$

(313,158

)

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders

 

$

(1,136,278

)

 

$

96,620

 

42


 

 

 

For The Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net revenue

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

100.0

%

Cost of revenue

 

 

69.4

%

 

 

68.5

%

Gross margin

 

 

30.6

%

 

 

31.5

%

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative

 

 

17.6

%

 

 

12.7

%

Marketing and selling

 

 

10.8

%

 

 

10.6

%

Research and development

 

 

10.8

%

 

 

9.8

%

Total operating expenses

 

 

39.2

%

 

 

33.1

%

Loss from operations

 

 

-8.6

%

 

 

-1.6

%

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

-0.2

%

 

 

-0.7

%

Other, net

 

 

0.7

%

 

 

0.1

%

Total other income (expense), net

 

 

0.6

%

 

 

-0.6

%

Loss before benefit from income taxes

 

 

-8.0

%

 

 

-2.2

%

Benefit for income taxes

 

 

-3.8

%

 

 

-1.5

%

Net loss

 

 

-4.2

%

 

 

-0.8

%

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

-1.2

%

 

 

-1.1

%

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders

 

 

-3.1

%

 

 

0.4

%

 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Adjusted EBITDA

We believe that the use of adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or adjusted EBITDA, is helpful for an investor to assess the performance of the Company.  The Company defines adjusted EBITDA as income (loss) attributable to common stockholders before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, acquisition expense, impairment of long-lived assets, financing costs, fair value adjustments from purchase accounting, stock-based compensation expense and expenses related to discontinued operations.

Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. Because of varying available valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety of equity instruments that can impact a company’s non-cash operating expenses, we believe that providing a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes non-cash and non-recurring expenses allows for meaningful comparisons between our core business operating results and those of other companies, as well as providing us with an important tool for financial and operational decision making and for evaluating our own core business operating results over different periods of time.

43


Our adjusted EBITDA measure may not provide information that is directly comparable to that provided by other companies in our industry, as other companies in our industry may calculate non-GAAP financial results differently, particularly related to non-recurring, unusual items. Our adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or as an indication of operating performance or any other measure of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. We do not consider adjusted EBITDA to be a substitute for, or superior to, the information provided by GAAP financial results.

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net (loss) income attributable to company

 

$

(1,136,278

)

 

$

96,620

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

1,350,329

 

 

 

836,274

 

Amortization of debt discount

 

 

24,830

 

 

 

23,837

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

527,335

 

 

 

160,062

 

Interest expense

 

 

65,693

 

 

 

199,257

 

Benefit for income taxes

 

 

(1,396,784

)

 

 

(402,717

)

Costs resulting from dissolution of SkyScale

 

 

705,309

 

 

 

-

 

Acquisition expense (1)

 

 

664,333

 

 

 

65,805

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

804,767

 

 

$

979,138

 

 

(1)

Expenses incurred in the acquisition of CDI and Bressner in 2018 and Ion in 2017, respectively.

Adjusted EPS

Adjusted EPS excludes the impact of certain items and, therefore, has not been calculated in accordance with GAAP. We believe that exclusion of certain selected items assists in providing a more complete understanding of our underlying results and trends and allows for comparability with our peer company index and industry. We use this measure along with the corresponding GAAP financial measures to manage our business and to evaluate our performance compared to prior periods and the marketplace. The Company defines Non-GAAP (loss) income attributable to common stockholders as (loss) or income before amortization, stock-based compensation, expenses related to discontinued operations, and acquisition costs.  Adjusted EPS expresses adjusted (loss) income on a per share basis using weighted average diluted shares outstanding.

Adjusted EPS is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial information provided in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures may not be computed in the same manner as similarly titled measures used by other companies. We expect to continue to incur expenses similar to the adjusted income from continuing operations and adjusted EPS financial adjustments described above, and investors should not infer from our presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures that these costs are unusual, infrequent or non-recurring.

44


The following table reconciles net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders and diluted earnings per share:

 

 

 

For The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders

 

$

(1,136,278

)

 

$

96,620

 

Amortization of intangibles

 

 

636,786

 

 

 

395,644

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

527,335

 

 

 

160,062

 

Costs resulting from dissolution of SkyScale

 

 

705,309

 

 

 

-

 

Acquisition expenses

 

 

664,333

 

 

 

65,805

 

Non-GAAP income attributable to common stockholders

 

$

1,397,485

 

 

$

718,131

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP income per share attributable to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.11

 

 

$

0.13

 

Diluted

 

$

0.10

 

 

$

0.07

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

12,586,513

 

 

 

5,449,413

 

Diluted

 

 

13,741,343

 

 

 

10,689,047

 

 

Free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure for reporting cash flow, is defined as cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures for property and equipment, which includes capitalized software development costs. We believe free cash flow provides investors with an important perspective on cash available for investments and acquisitions after making capital investments required to support ongoing business operations and long-term value creation.   We believe that trends in our free cash flow can be valuable indicators of our operating performance and liquidity.

Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial information provided in accordance with GAAP. This non-GAAP financial measure may not be computed in the same manner as similarly titled measures used by other companies.

We expect to continue to incur expenditures similar to the free cash flow adjustments described above, and investors should not infer from our presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure that these expenditures reflect all of our obligations which require cash.  The following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to free cash flow:

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Cash used in operating activities

 

$

(3,909,643

)

 

$

(381,766

)

Capital expenditures

 

 

(623,166

)

 

 

(425,482

)

Free cash flow

 

$

(4,532,809

)

 

$

(807,248

)

 

45


Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

Net revenue

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Revenues:

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

OSS - (organic, inclusive of SkyScale)

 

$

32,487,630

 

 

$

27,538,333

 

 

 

87.7

%

 

 

100.0

%

Concept Development Inc.

 

 

755,259

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2.0

%

 

 

0.0

%

Bressner Technology GmbH

 

 

3,784,493

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10.2

%

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

$

37,027,382

 

 

$

27,538,333

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

100.0

%

 

For the year ended December 31, 2018, total revenue increased $9,489,049 or 34.5%, as compared to the same period in 2017. The increase in revenue was primarily driven by OSS with an increase of $4,821,671 or 17.5 percentage points of the total increase in revenue.  This increase was attributable mainly to increased sales of flash arrays on our airborne military contract and improvement in sales to our OEM media and entertainment customers. SkyScale contributed $158,514 or 0.5 percentage points which was an increase of $127,627 as compared to the previous year.  CDI which was acquired on August 31, 2018 contributed $755,259 or 2.7 percentage points of the total revenue increase for 2018.  Bressner Technology GmbH (Bressner) which was acquired on October 31, 2018, contributed $3,784,493 or 13.8 percentage points of the total revenue increase for 2018.

Cost of revenue and gross margin

Cost of revenue increased by $6,818,861 or 36.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. The increase in cost of revenue was primarily driven by an increase in OSS cost of sales of $2,551,507 or 13.5 percentage points of the total increase.  This increase was attributable mainly to increased sales of flash arrays on our airborne military contract and improvement in sales to our OEM media and entertainment customers and an increase in applied labor and overhead to cost of goods sold of $952,341 based upon an evaluation of labor and overhead costs and allocations.   SkyScale had cost of revenue of $675,058 or 3.6 percentage points as a result of underutilization of resources.  CDI contributed $748,230 in costs or 4.0 percentage points of the annual increase while Bressner contributed $2,844,066 or 15.0 percentage points of the annual increase for 2018.

The overall gross margin percentage decreased from 31.5% for the year ended December 31, 2017 to 30.6% for the year ended December 31, 2018, a decrease of 0.7 percentage points.  OSS gross margin percentage for the year ended December 31, 2018, was 33.7%, which includes a revaluation of labor and overhead cost allocations applied to inventory which eroded the OSS’s gross margin by approximately 2.9 percentage points, this is in comparison to the prior year period of 31.4%.  The improvement in OSS’s margin is attributable to the core business of OSS and the sale of flash array systems.  SkyScale contributed negative margin of $516,545 as a result the underutilization of resources and lack of revenue.  CDI contributed gross margin at a rate of 0.9%, while Bressner contributed gross margin at a rate of 24.8% for the periods in which these new entities were owned.  

46


Operating expenses

General and administrative expense

General and administrative expense increased $3,010,300, or 85.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to same period in 2017.  OSS contributed an additional $2,754,460 or 91.5% of the total annual increase in these expenses.  The increase in general and administrative expense increased primarily due to acquisition fees of $664,333 incurred in the acquisitions of CDI and Bressner.  Additionally, due to the dissolution of SkyScale the Company incurred $776,811 in additional costs.  The Company wrote off receivables of $648,411 for notes, interest receivable, and accounts receivable.  There was also an accrual for additional costs expected to be incurred in the amount of $288,400 related to termination of a service agreement and the settlement for abandonment of the rental space at this co-location facility.  These charges were offset by the receipt of equipment valued at $160,000 and allocated net income of $71,502 from the dissolution of SkyScale.  Additionally, there was increased third party service costs associated with being a public company which includes legal and accounting costs, insurance, listing fees and reporting and compliance costs.  Additionally, there was a minimal increase in salaries.  SkyScale actually saw a reduction of administrative costs of $221,340 (7.3%) as a result of not incurring one-time start-up costs that were incurred in the prior year.  CDI contributed $144,971 or 4.8% of the annual increase while Bressner contributed $332,209 or 11.0 % of the total annual increase.  Overall general and administrative expenses increased as a percentage of revenue to 17.6% during the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to 12.7 % during the same period in 2017.

Marketing and selling expense

Marketing and selling expense increased $1,070,531 or 36.6% during the year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to the same period in 2017.  OSS had an increase of $693,543 or 64.8% of the total increase.  Major components of the change were an increase in external commissions associated with the sale of flash array systems and increases in employee costs.  SkyScale had an increase of $54,864 or 5.1% of the increase attributable to tradeshow costs.  CDI’s marketing expense for 2018 was negligible at $4,518 and Bressner contributed $317,606 or 31.3% of the total annual increase.  Overall, total marketing and selling expense increased as a percentage of revenue to 10.8% during the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to 10.6% during the same period in 2017.

Research and development expense

Research and development expense increased by $1,314,508 or 48.9% during the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to same period in 2017.  These expenses are mainly compromised of salary and related costs and professional consulting services attributable to continued development of new and enhanced product offerings.  OSS saw an increase of $1,059,429 or 80.6%.  The increase for the year was largely driven by increased employee compensation costs of approximately $700,000 which was attributable to new employees being hired in the latter half of 2017 for which the full annualized burden of these additional employees is reflected in 2018.  Additionally, OSS incurred additional expense for outside contractors of approximately $180,000 and depreciation expense of approximately $113,000 associated with test equipment.  CDI contributed $174,522 or 13.3% of the annual increase while Bressner contributed $80,555 of 6.1% of the annual increase for 2018. Overall, total research and development expense increased as a percentage of revenue to 10.8% during the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to 9.8% during the same period in 2017.

Interest expense

Interest expense decreased $133,564 or (67.0%) for the year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to same period in 2017, as the outstanding debt associated with OSS which was outstanding as of December 31, 2017, was paid down in its entirety with proceeds from its public offering.  Thus, since February 2018, OSS has been free of debt. Interest expense decreased $143,451 as compared to the same time period in the previous year as a result of not carrying any debt after February 2018. CDI contributed a minimal amount of interest expense.  On October 31, 2018, the Company acquired Bressner which has a line of credit and certain term loans outstanding and as a result incurred interest charges of $9,817.  

47


Other income (expense), net

Other income (expense), which increased $241,438 during the year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to the same period in 2017.  Significant components of other income (expenses), includes interest income of $85,710 which was mainly attributable to earned interest on bank deposits which were derived from our public offering, and a net currency translation gain of $16,983, a gain of $56,058 attributable to settlement of outstanding obligations, and a loss on disposal of OSS equipment of $63,142.  Included in other income is also a net gain of $173,105 from SkyScale resulting from disposition of certain of its assets and liabilities and $30,729 from data mining of digital currencies.

Provision for income taxes

We have recorded an income tax benefit of $1,396,784 for the year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to a tax benefit of $402,717 for the same period in 2017.  The increase in benefit is attributable to the increase in pre-tax loss of $2,350,149 when comparing the two periods.  The effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were 47% and 65%, respectively.  For the year ended December 31, 2018, the reduction in the effective tax rate is attributable to the increased loss for the year and the related tax benefit and an increase in stock compensation expense.

Liquidity and capital resources

During 2018, our primary sources of liquidity came from existing cash, net proceeds from our February IPO, a bank revolving line of credit and related party and third party term notes. Based on our current plans and business conditions, we believe that existing cash and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.  In addition to cash generated from operations, certain members of the Company’s Board of Directors have executed a definitive agreement to commit funds of up to $4,000,000 as a credit facility if called upon.

Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors including our growth rate, the timing and extent of spending to support development efforts, the expansion of our sales and marketing, the timing of new product introductions and the continuing market acceptance of our products and services.

We may be required to seek additional equity or debt financing. In the event that additional financing is required from outside sources, we may not be able to raise monies on terms acceptable to us or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital when desired, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:

 

 

 

For the years ended December 31,

 

Cash flows:

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

$

(3,909,643

)

 

$

(381,766

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

$

(5,909,192

)

 

$

(425,482

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

$

11,900,178

 

 

$

978,768

 

 

48


Operating Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we used $3,909,623 in cash from operating activities, an increase in the use of cash of $3,527,857 when compared to the cash used in operating activities of $381,766 during the same period in 2017. The increase in cash used in operating activities was primarily a result of an increase in net loss, and an increase in non-cash adjustments, comprised of the deferred benefit for income taxes, amortization of deferred gain, , inventory reserves, offset by increases in amortization and depreciation,  and stock-based compensation expense.  During the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, net loss adjusted for non-cash expenditures was $595,347 in 2018 as compared to a net income adjusted for non-cash expenditures of $929,438 in 2017, a decrease of $1,524,785. Additionally, working capital requirements increase overall by $2,003,072.  This net increase was attributable to an increase in working capital provided by reductions in inventories and prepaid expenses and other current assets and an increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $3,045,031.  These sources of working capital were offset by uses of working capital of $5,048,103 attributable to accounts receivable and accounts payable for the comparable period.

Our ability to generate cash from operations in future periods will depend in large part on our profitability, the rate and timing of collections of our accounts receivable, our inventory turns and our ability to manage other areas of working capital including accounts payable.

Investing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we used cash of $5,909,192 in investing activities as compared to $425,483 used during the same period in 2017, an increase of $5,483,710. The net increase is primarily due to purchase of two entities, Concept Development Inc., on August 31, 2018 and Bressner Technology GmbH on October 31, 2018.  Additionally, the Company made investments in test equipment and began the implementation of an ERP system for which the software costs and external consulting costs are being capitalized.  We are in the process of expanding and completing tenant improvements to our facility which are anticipated to be approximately $550,000 and anticipate additional costs in the implementation of our ERP system of approximately $600,000.  We do not anticipate any other significant purchases of equipment beyond that which is anticipated for use in the normal course of our core business activity.

Financing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we generated $11,900,178 from financing activities as compared to the cash generated of $978,768 during the same period in 2017.  During the year 2018, we received proceeds from the sale of common stock in our initial public offering of $19,500,000 which was offset by our stock issuance costs for commissions and third party professional services.  We also received $113,168 from the exercise of warrants and stock options.  With the proceeds from our initial public offering we paid off our line of credit and retired all outstanding debt obligations so that the Company is debt free.  Additionally, as part of the acquisition of CDI the Company assumed the obligation of a working capital line loan in the amount of $370,096, which was subsequently paid in full.  We also incurred certain employee costs associated with the exercise of employee stock options, which were consummated on a net exercise basis.

Contractual obligations and commitments

The following table sets forth our non-cancellable contractual obligations as of December 31, 2018.

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Less than 1 year

 

 

1-3 years

 

 

3-5 years

 

 

More than 5 Years

 

Notes payable

 

$

1,421,953

 

 

$

1,156,915

 

 

$

265,038

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

Operating leases

 

 

2,707,126

 

 

 

867,281

 

 

 

1,316,678

 

 

 

523,167

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

4,129,079

 

 

$

2,024,196

 

 

$

1,581,716

 

 

$

523,167

 

 

$

-

 

 

49


All OSS notes payable were paid-off in February 2018, from proceeds from the Company’s initial public offering.  Subsequently on October 31, 2018, the Company acquired Bressner which had a line of credit and certain term loans outstanding which are reflected in the schedule above.  We have made certain indemnities, under which the Company may be required to make payments to an indemnified party, in relation to certain transactions.  We indemnify our directors, officers, employees and agents to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware.  In connection with our facilities leases, we indemnify our lessors for certain claims arising from the use of our facilities.  The duration of the indemnities varies, and in many cases is indefinite.  These indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments we could be obligated to make.  Historically, we have not been obligated to make any payments for these obligations and no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities.

Off balance sheet arrangements

Other than lease commitments incurred in the normal course of business and certain indemnification provisions, we do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or liabilities, guarantee contracts, retained or contingent interests in transferred assets, or any obligation arising out of a material variable interest in an unconsolidated entity.

We do not have any majority-owned subsidiaries that are not consolidated in the financial statements. Additionally, we do not have an interest in, or relationships with, any special purpose entities.  Prior to the 2018 pay-off of our outstanding notes payable and line of credit, our CEO provided a personal guarantee on much of our outstanding debt obligations.

Stockholder transactions

Effective August 1, 2016, we entered into a management services agreement with a company owned by the former Chief Executive Officer of Magma.  The agreement calls for payments of $180,000 per year for the first two years paid in monthly installments.  In year three the amount is reduced to $37,500 for the year paid in monthly installments.  Additionally, we granted 30,000 options in conjunction with execution of this agreement.  Payments for the year ended December 31, 2018 were $120,625.

Critical accounting policies and estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, and related disclosures. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our estimates are based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.  The critical accounting estimates, assumptions and judgments that we believe have the most significant impact on our consolidated financial statements are described below.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605.  Accordingly, revenue from the sale of products is recognized when there is evidence of an arrangement, the selling price is fixed or determinable, title and risk of loss has transferred to the customer, any installation or service obligations have been satisfied, and collection is reasonably assured. Net revenue includes deductions for customer discounts and actual and estimated returns. All amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling are classified as net sales.

50


Customer agreements include one vendor managed inventory program.  Pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13.A.3.a , the Company recognizes revenue under this arrangement when (i) risks of ownership have passed to the customer; (ii) the customer's  commitment to purchase the goods is fixed ; (iii) there is a fixed schedule for delivery of the goods that is reasonable and consistent with the custome r ' s  business purpose ; (iv) the Company does not have any specific performance obligations such that the earning process is not complete; (v) the ordered goods been segregated from the Compan y ' s inventory and are not s ubject to being used to fill other orders; and (vi) the product is complete and ready for shipment.  Also , such arrangement must be requested by the customer and the customer has explained a substantial business purpose for the arrangement.  Management also considers whether the custome r ' s custodial risks are insured and whether modifications to the Compan y ' s normal billing and credit terms were required.

Revenues on certain fixed-price contracts where we provide engineering services, prototypes and completed products are recognized over the contract term based on the percentage of completion based upon milestones delivered that are provided during the period and compared to the total estimated development and milestone goals to be provided over the entire contract. These services require that we perform significant, extensive and complex design, development, modification or implementation of our customers’ systems. Performance will often extend over long periods of time, and our right to receive future payment depends on our future performance in accordance with the agreement.

The percentage-of-completion methodology involves recognizing probable and reasonably estimable revenue using the percentage of services completed, on a current cumulative cost to estimated total cost basis, using a reasonably consistent profit margin over the period. Due to the long-term nature of these projects, developing the estimates of costs often requires significant judgment. Factors that must be considered in estimating the progress of work completed and ultimate cost of the projects include, but are not limited to, the availability of labor and labor productivity, the nature and complexity of the work to be performed and the impact of delayed performance. If changes occur in delivery, productivity or other factors used in developing the estimates of costs or revenues, we revise our cost and revenue estimates, which may result in increases or decreases in revenues and costs, and such revisions are reflected in income in the period in which the facts that give rise to that revision become known. Related billings that are in excess of revenue earned are deferred and recorded as a liability on the balance sheet until the related services are provided.  The Company recognizes revenues for non-refundable, upfront implementation fees on a straight-line basis over the period beginning with initiation of ongoing services through the end of the contract term.

Stock-Based Compensation

We measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards granted to our employees and other service providers, including stock options granted under our 2017 and 2015 Plans, based on the estimated fair value of the award. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock option awards granted under our 2017 and 2015 Plans. We recognize the fair value of stock options granted under our 2017 and 2015’s Plan as stock-based compensation on a straight line basis over the requisite service period. We record expense net of anticipated forfeitures and adjust the annual expense based upon actual experience.  

Compensation cost for stock awards, which include restricted stock units (“RSUs”) is measured at the fair value on the grant date and recognized as expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the related service period. The fair value of stock awards is based on the quoted price of our common stock on the grant date less the present value of expected dividends not received during the vesting period.

Our use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the fair value of the underlying common stock, expected term of the option, expected volatility of the price of our common stock, risk-free interest rates and the expected dividend yield of our common stock. The assumptions used in our option pricing model represent management’s best estimates. These estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. If factors change and different assumptions are used, our stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.  

51


These assumptions and estimates are as follows:  

 

Fair Value of Common Stock.  While we were a privately-held company, our Board of Directors considered numerous objective and subjective factors to determine the fair value of our common stock at each grant date. These factors included, but were not limited to, (i) contemporaneous valuations of common stock performed by unrelated third-party specialists; (ii) the rights, preferences and privileges of our convertible preferred stock relative to those of our common stock; (iii) the lack of marketability of our common stock; (iv) developments in the business; (v) the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, such as an IPO or a merger or acquisition of our business, given prevailing market conditions; and (vi) the market performance of comparable publicly traded companies.  Since the completion of our IPO, we use the closing quoted price of our common stock on the date of grant.

 

Expected Term.  The expected term represents the period that our stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding. The expected term assumptions were determined based on the vesting terms, exercise terms and contractual lives of the options.  

 

Expected Volatility.  Since we do not have sufficient trading history of our common stock, the expected volatility was determined based on the historical stock volatilities of comparable companies. Comparable companies consist of public companies in our industry that is similar in size, stage of life cycle and financial leverage. We intend to continue to apply this process using the same or similar public companies until a sufficient amount of historical information regarding the volatility of our own share price becomes available, or unless circumstances change such that the identified companies are no longer similar to us, in which case, more suitable companies whose share prices are publicly available would be used in the calculation.  

 

Risk-Free Interest Rate.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with remaining terms similar to the expected term on the options.  

 

Dividend Rate.  We have never declared or paid any cash dividends and do not plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future, and, therefore, use an expected dividend yield of zero.  

We will continue to use judgment in evaluating the assumptions related to our stock-based compensation on a prospective basis. As we continue to accumulate additional data related to our common stock, we may refine our estimation process, which could materially impact our future stock-based compensation expense.

Inventory Valuation

We value our inventory at the lower of cost or its estimated net realizable value with cost measured on a first-in, first-out basis.  We use the average cost method for purposes of determining cost, which approximates the first-in, first-out method. We write down inventory for excess and obsolescence based upon a review of historical usage and assumptions about future demand, product mix and possible alternative uses. Actual demand, product mix and alternative usage may be lower than those that we project and this difference could have a material adverse effect on our gross margin if inventory write-downs beyond those initially recorded become necessary.  Alternatively, if actual demand, product mix and alternative usage are more favorable than those we estimated at the time of such a write-down, our gross margin could be favorably impacted in future periods.

Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Long-lived Assets

We evaluate our goodwill, intangible and long-lived assets for impairment when events or circumstances arise that indicate our goodwill, intangible and long–assets may be impaired. Indicators of impairment include, but are not limited to, a significant deterioration in overall economic conditions, a decline in our market capitalization, the loss of significant business, significant decreases in funding for our contracts, or other significant adverse changes in industry or market conditions.  The Company completed its qualitative assessment for impairment in December 2018 and determined that there was no impairment of goodwill, intangible and long-lived assets.

52


Income Taxes

The determination of income tax expense requires us to make certain estimates and judgments concerning the calculation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, as well as the deductions and credits that are available to reduce taxable income. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our consolidated financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

In evaluating our ability to recover deferred tax assets, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including our past operating results, our forecast of future earnings, future taxable income, and tax planning strategies. The assumptions utilized in determining future taxable income require significant judgment. We record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. If it becomes more likely than not that a tax asset will be used for which a reserve has been provided, we reverse the related valuation allowance. If our actual future taxable income by tax jurisdiction differs from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

We use a two-step approach to recognize and measure uncertain tax positions. First, the tax position must be evaluated to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination. If the tax position is deemed more-likely-than-not to be sustained, the tax position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the largest amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We reevaluate our uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis and any changes to these positions as a result of tax audits, tax laws or other facts and circumstances could result in additional charges to operations.

Business Combinations

We utilize the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations and allocate the purchase price of an acquisition to the various tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. We primarily establish fair value using the income approach based upon a discounted cash flow model. The income approach requires the use of many assumptions and estimates including future revenues and expenses, as well as discount factors and income tax rates. Other estimates include:

 

Estimated step-ups or write-downs for fixed assets and inventory;

 

Estimated fair values of intangible assets; and

 

Estimated income tax assets and liabilities assumed from the target

While we use our best estimates and assumptions as part of the purchase price allocation process to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the business acquisition date, our estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the purchase price allocation period, which is generally one year from the business acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill.

For changes in the valuation of intangible assets between preliminary and final purchase price allocation, the related amortization is adjusted in the period it occurs. Subsequent to the purchase price allocation period any adjustment to assets acquired or liabilities assumed is included in operating results in the period in which the adjustment is determined.  Should we issue shares of our common stock in an acquisition, we will be required to estimate the fair value of the shares issued.

Recent accounting pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance which provides a single, comprehensive accounting model for revenue arising from contracts with customers. This guidance supersedes most of the existing revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. Under this model, revenue is recognized at an amount that a company expects to be entitled to upon transferring control of goods or services to a customer, as opposed to when risks and rewards transfer to a customer. The new guidance also requires additional disclosures about the nature, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flow arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments

53


and changes in judgments. Considering the one-year delay in the required adoption date for the guidance as issued in July 2015, the new guidance is effective for us beginning in 2018 and may be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented or through a cumulative adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance in the year of adoption. We will adopt this standard beginning January 1, 2019 and expect to use the modified retrospective method of adoption. Under the new guidance, based on the nature of our contracts, we expect to continue to recognize revenue in a similar manner as with the current guidance. Additionally, we expect the unit of accounting, that is, the identification of performance obligations, will be consistent with current revenue guidance. Accordingly, the adoption of this standard is not expected to significantly impact our revenues.   

The new standard is not expected to have a significant impact to revenue recognition for product deliveries for which we have historically recognized revenue as the related products were shipped. Under the new standard we will recognize revenue for these contracts at a point in time when the products transfer to the customer which is customarily upon shipment.

The new standard is not expected to have a significant impact to revenue recognition for our customer-funded research and development contracts that we have historically recognized revenue based on completion of specified milestones. Under the new standard we will continue to recognize revenue for these contracts based upon completion and acceptance of the specified milestone.  

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”).  Under ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term.  ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early application is permitted.  Lessees must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements.  The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented.  Lessees may not apply a full retrospective transition approach.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures , but preliminary expects its assets and liabilities to increase significantly.

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which is intended to reduce the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted, provided that all of the amendments are adopted in the same period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-15 on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”). The amendments in this update clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 will be effective for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2019 and interim reporting periods within that year. Early adoption is permitted for transactions that have not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Stock-based Compensation: Improvements to Nonemployee Share-based Payment Accounting , which amends the existing accounting standards for share-based payments to nonemployees. This ASU aligns much of the guidance on measuring and classifying nonemployee awards with that of awards to employees. Under the new guidance, the measurement of nonemployee equity awards is fixed on the grant date. This ASU becomes effective in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 and early adoption is permitted but no earlier than an entity’s adoption date of Topic 606. Entities will apply the ASU by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the annual period of adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2018-07 will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

54


 

Recently implemented accounting pronouncements

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU 2017-04 simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment testing. An entity will no longer determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Instead, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary.  The Company adopted early ASU 2017-04 in 2018, as permitted for interim and annual impairment testing after January 1, 2017.  The Company’s early adoption of this guideline did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting (“ASU 2017-09”), which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in ASC Topic 718. Under the new guidance, modification accounting is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions, or the classification of the award (as equity or liability) changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions. ASU 2017-09 will be effective for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2017 and interim reporting periods within that year. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adoption of this guideline did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330) ("ASU 2015-11"). The amendments in ASU 2015-11 require that an entity measure inventory within the scope of the standard at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transaction. The amendments in this update more closely align the measurement of inventory in U.S. GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017.  The Company adopted ASU No. 2015-11 in the first quarter of 2018, without a material impact to its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) (“ASU 2016-09”), which simplified certain aspects of the accounting for stock-based payment transactions, including income taxes, classification of awards and classification in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-09 in the first quarter of 2018, with no impact to its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

Interest rate risk

Our exposure to interest rate risk is related primarily associated with borrowing on revolving lines of credit denominated in both U.S. dollars and Euros.  We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowing activities for our variable rate borrowings.

Concentration of credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially expose us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents and accounts receivable. We place our cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions with high credit quality. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, we had $2,272,256 and $185,716, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents on deposit or invested with our financial and lending institutions.

We provide credit to our customers in the normal course of business. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and limit the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary.

55


Foreign currency risk

We operate primarily in the United States.  Foreign sales of products and services are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars.  We also conduct business outside the United States through our foreign subsidiary in Germany, where business is largely transacted in non-U.S. dollar currencies particularly the Euro, which is subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.   Accordingly, we are subject to exposure from changes in the exchange rates of local currencies. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recorded in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations

OSS GmbH operates as an extension of OSS’s domestic operations and acquired Bressner Technology GmbH in October 2018.  The functional currency of OSS GmbH is the Euro. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are remeasured to the functional currency at the average exchange rate in effect during the period.  At the end of each reporting period, monetary assets and liabilities are translated using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured at historical exchange rates. Consequently, changes in the exchange rates of the currencies may impact the translation of the foreign subsidiaries’ statements of operations into U.S. dollars, which may in turn affect our consolidated statement of operations. The resulting foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We employ derivatives to manage certain market risks through the use of foreign exchange forward contracts. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Our derivatives are designated as a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash flow hedge). We hedge a portion of the exchange risk involved in anticipation of highly probable foreign currency-denominated transactions. In anticipation of these transactions, we enter into foreign exchange contracts to provide currency at a fixed rate.

ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

See the financial statements included elsewhere in this report beginning at page F-1, which are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

56


ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES .

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic and current reports that we file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. In addition, the design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

As disclosed elsewhere in this report, the Company acquired CDI and Bressner during 2018.  Because these businesses were recently acquired, management has excluded them from our assessment.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets, (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.  Because of its inherent limitations, internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.  We have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.  Based on our evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.  

As disclosed elsewhere in this report, the Company acquired CDI and Bressner during 2018.  Because these businesses were recently acquired, management has excluded them from our assessment.

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm due to an exemption established by the JOBS Act for “emerging growth companies.”

57


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2018, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.  However, there have been changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2018, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.   There has been significant improvement to our internal controls as a result of initial implementation of our material weaknesses remediation plan which was prepared in response to material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. As defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, a “material weakness” is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Specifically:

 

(i)

we did not have sufficient segregation of duties within our accounting functions; and

 

(ii)

we lacked appropriate controls to ensure the accuracy of labor and overhead inventory rates as well as excess and obsolescence inventory reserves.

We have remediated the material weaknesses set forth above through implementation of the following policies and procedures:

 

To address the identified weaknesses surrounding segregation of duties, supervision and expertise, in September 2017, we hired a chief financial officer with appropriate experience applying GAAP technical accounting guidance and have increased the number of hours worked by our contracted accounting personnel who are responsible for the closing process and external financial reporting. In June 2018, we hired a controller for the Company who is responsible for the day-to-day activities and supervision of the Accounting Department.  With the introduction of additional personnel, incompatible functions with respect to the segregation of duties and the recording of a transaction (including the review and approval processes) are being reassigned to different personnel to strengthen the control environment.

 

To strengthen the weaknesses in the control environment surrounding inventory and inventory valuation, we have and continue to evolve a new analytical process to identify slow-moving and obsolete inventory and we have re-evaluated our methodology of applying labor and overhead to work-in-process and finished goods inventory.  We are also strengthening the controls regarding physical verification of inventory on-hand by introducing cycle counts and doing periodic inventory counts.

 

As of October 31, 2018, the Company has contracted for a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and accounting system with Infor.  The implementation of the company-wide system will allow the Company to improve management and accounting controls over manufacturing and reporting.  The initial implementation phase is expected to be completed during the third quarter of 2019.

 

On February 13, 2019, our Board of Directors decided, based on the recommendation of its Nominating and Governance Committee, to separate the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Steve Cooper remains as our Chief Executive Officer, and Kenneth Potashner, an existing board member, was appointed Chairman, effective after the Company’s annual stockholder meeting currently scheduled for May 15, 2019.  We believe the appointment of an independent director as our Chairman and the separation of roles further solidifies the segregation of duties and board oversite as it relates to internal controls over financial reporting.

Our ongoing plan for improvement in our internal control environment also includes the integration of recent acquisitions and relevant and appropriate internal training on technical GAAP topics, as well as SEC reporting requirements.

 

On August 31, 2018, the Company acquired Concept Development Inc., and is in the process of integrating business operations which includes the integration of financial reporting systems and adopting the Company’s policies, procedures and internal controls over financial and management systems.

58


 

On October 31, 2018, OSS GmbH acquired Bressner Technology Inc., located near Munich, Germany.  We are in the process of reviewing the internal control environment and establishing and refining the financial reporting process and procedures.

We continue to improve upon our internal control environment as we integrate recent acquisitions into our control environment and refine our processes and procedures to address our growing business and operations in other geographies. Except for additional personnel costs, we have not incurred any material costs in the implementation of our remediation plan as we have been implementing the plan internally. However, the Company is now making a substantial capital investment into a new ERP system which is expected to cost approximately $700,000 for software and implementation resources.  As we continue to evaluate and take actions to improve our internal control over financial reporting, we may determine to take additional actions to address control deficiencies or determine to modify our plan based upon changes in our internal control environment.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

59


PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Executive Officers and Directors

The following table sets forth the names, ages, and positions of our executive officers and directors as of February 28, 2019. There are no arrangements, agreements or understandings between non-management security holders and management under which non-management security holders may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of our affairs. There are no arrangements or understandings between any director and any other person pursuant to which any director or executive officer was or is to be selected as a director or executive officer, as applicable. There currently are no legal proceedings, and during the past ten years there have been no legal proceedings that are material to the evaluation of the ability or integrity of any of our directors or director nominees.

 

Name

 

Age

 

Position

Executive Officers

 

 

 

 

Steve Cooper

 

61

 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

John W. Morrison, Jr.

 

61

 

Chief Financial Officer

Jim Ison

 

49

 

Vice President of Sales

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Employee Directors

 

 

 

 

Kenneth Potashner (1)(2)

 

61

 

Director

John Reardon

 

58

 

Director

Kimberly Sentovich (2)(3)

 

51  

 

Director

Randy Jones

 

68

 

Director and Vice Chairman

Jack Harrison (1)(2)(3)

 

63

 

Director

David Raun (1)(3)

 

57

 

Director

 

(1)

Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

(2)

Member of the Compensation Committee.

(3)

Member of the Audit Committee.

Executive Officers

Steve Cooper has served as our chief executive officer, president and chairman of our board of directors since co-founding OSS in 1998. He brings more than 39 years of experience running high technology, high growth rate businesses as a technologist with a long record of technical innovations, including multiple patents. Mr. Cooper began his career with Intel and RadiSys in sales, marketing and technology roles. He has authored and published more than 30 articles and technical conference papers dealing with the computer technology, fault-tolerant computer architectures, bus interfacing standards, open systems and related business and technology issues. He holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from University of California at Santa Barbara.

John W. Morrison, Jr. has served as our chief financial officer since September 1, 2017. Mr. Morrison has been a CPA for more than 30 years with experience in public accounting and all aspects of financial reporting and financing. From June 2014 to September 2017, he served as the chief financial and operations officer for Carol Cole Company. Prior to Carol Cole, he served as a consultant to various private companies regarding their financial and operational affairs. From January 2013 to September 2013 he served as the chief financial officer of Gen-E, an information technology and services company for service providers and companies with large, complex networks. Mr. Morrison also served as the executive vice president and chief financial officer for the Kelley Blue Book Company for 11 years. He began his career working 15 years for the public accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (now PwC) both in the U.S. and Asia. Mr. Morrison holds a B.S. in accounting and business management and M.S. in Accounting from Brigham Young University.

60


Jim Ison , has been with OSS since 2004 and currently serves as the VP of Sales. Mr. Ison has 26 years’ combined experience in the bus-board marketplace and the HPC industry. Prior to joining OSS, he held various sales and marketing positions centered on COTS military and converged communications accounts for Ziatech Corporation and Rittal Corporation. Mr. Ison holds a B.S. in aeronautical engineering from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo and an MBA from University of Florida.

Board of Directors

Kenneth Potashner  has served as a member of our board of directors since 2006.  Mr. Potashner has extensive BOD experience in high growth, high technology global organizations. He has served as Chairman of Newport Corporation where he provided 18 years of service culminating in the sale of Newport in 2016 for $980M.  Mr. Potashner was Chairman of Maxwell Technologies and directed it through a period of rapid expansion. He has also served on the BOD of California Micro Devices, SonicBlue Inc, and Singapore Technologies, all publicly traded companies.  Potashner is currently serving as the Executive Chairman of Home Bay Technologies.  He has also has served on the Board of many private companies as well including  DynaOptics, MyOffice.com, Underground Elephant, Lumedyne, Events.com,  and several others. Several of the private companies that Mr. Potashner has had affiliations with have achieved successful exits or significant financings.  Mr. Potashner has a BSEE from Lafayette College and an MSEE from SMU, Executive certifications from Columbia and INSEAD in Lausanne, Switzerland. He also has an Advanced Professional Director certification from American Board of Directors

John Reardon has served on our board of directors since 2000.  Mr. Reardon has served as an independent director on Neonode, Inc. (Nasdaq, Neon), an optical touch and sensor company located in Stockholm, Sweden; along with SBE, Inc. (Nasdaq, SBEI), a telecommunications company located in Silicon Valley, California.  He has served in the capacity of Chairman on Audit, Compensation, Pricing and Special Committees.  Mr. Reardon also runs as Chief Executive Officer a boutique publishing company, RTC Media, LLC where he performs services for many industry leaders such as NVidia, AMD, Intel, Microsoft, Mercury and ARM.  He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from National University in Marketing.    Mr. Reardon has been a senior mentor for Chairmen’s Round Table for 12 years, where he aids companies in achieving their strategic goals.

Randy Jones has served as a director since December 2016. He also currently serves as a strategic consultant to OSS. Prior to joining OSS as a director and consultant, he served as the chief executive officer of Mission Technology Group, Inc. (“Magma”) from April 2007 up through Magma’s acquisition by OSS in July 2016. Prior to Magma, he gained decades of senior and C-level experience in high technology companies including IBM, Sybase, Intelligent Electronics, Ingram Micro, and others. Mr. Jones holds an MBA from the University of California, Los Angeles and an M.S. in engineering sciences (bioengineering) from the University of California, San Diego. He brings a broad range of strategic knowledge in OSS’ industry by virtue of his time growing and developing Magma and his previous high-tech related roles. Mr. Jones will not be standing for re-election at our forthcoming annual stockholders’ meeting.

Jack Harrison has served on our board of directors since December 2016. He was founder, president and chief executive officer of Aspen Integrated Technologies, a microelectronics and MEMS company, which he sold in 2011. Mr. Harrison is currently the president of Integrity Energy, an oil and gas company, and also serves as the chairman of the board of Reach Beyond: a non-profit charitable organization of which he has been affiliated for more than 20 years. Mr. Harrison holds a BME degree from Wheaton College. He brings decades of experience in the microelectronics space and his business and technical expertise represent important assets to OSS.

David Raun has served on our board of directors since December 2016. Mr. Raun currently serves as the chief operations officer at Home Bay, an on-line technology base real estate company.  Previously, Mr. Raun was the president, interim chief financial officer and COO of ASSIA, Inc. a Silicon Valley-based SaaS and strategic partner and solutions vendor to broadband service providers worldwide until August 2018.  Prior to ASSIA, he was with PLX Technology, Inc., a publicly-traded company on Nasdaq, from 2004-2014 where he eventually became president, chief executive officer and a director. As president and chief executive officer he led the company to an acquisition by Avago (now Broadcom). Mr. Raun holds a B.S. in computer and electrical engineering from University of California, Santa Barbara. In all, Mr. Raun holds more than 20 years of experience at senior management and board levels in public and private companies which is a great benefit to OSS.

61


Kimberly Sentovich joined the board in February 2019 and is a seasoned merchandising, operations, IT and supply chain executive with 30 years of experience with multi-billion-dollar profit and loss responsibility.  From 2017 to 2018, Ms. Sentovich served as the Senior Vice President of Operations for Torrid, an apparel retailer.  From 2015 to 2017, Ms. Sentovich was Executive Vice President of Stores and Logistics at Gymboree, responsible for all 1300 company owned stores in North America.  Ms. Sentovich previously spent seven years (2008-2015) at Walmart rising from Regional Vice President of Operations – California to Divisional Senior Vice President of Operations – Pacific Division and fifteen years at The Home Depot (1993-2008) rising to the level of Regional Vice President of Operations.  Ms. Sentovich obtained her MBA from The Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine and her B.A. in Philosophy and Political Science with a Minor in economics from Bryn Mawr College. Ms. Sentovich’s extensive executive and operations experience, as well as her independence, judgment and exceptional leadership experience makes her a valuable addition to the Board.

Board Composition and Election of Directors

Director Independence

Our board of directors consists of seven (7) members. Our board of directors has determined that Kenneth Potashner, Jack Harrison, David Raun, and Kim Sentovich are all independent directors in accordance with the listing requirements of The Nasdaq Capital Market. The Nasdaq independence definition includes a series of objective tests, including that the director is not, and has not been for at least three years, one of our employees and that neither the director nor any of his family members has engaged in various types of business dealings with us. In addition, as required by Nasdaq rules, our board of directors has made a subjective determination as to each independent director that no relationships exist, which, in the opinion of our board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In making these determinations, our board of directors reviewed and discussed information provided by the directors and us with regard to each director’s business and personal activities and relationships as they may relate to us and our management.

Except for the following, there are no family relationships among any of our directors of executive officers.  John Reardon, a director of the Company, and James Reardon, President of the CDI Division of the Company are brothers.  Upon acquisition of CDI and James Reardon’s affiliation with the Company, John Reardon is no longer deemed an independent director of the Company.  

Board Committees and Independence

Our board of directors has established three standing committees – audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance – each of which operates under a charter that has been approved by our board of directors.

Audit Committee

The audit committee’s main function is to oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements. This committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

 

Selecting and retaining (subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders) our independent registered public accounting firm;

 

Setting the compensation of our independent registered public accounting firm;

 

Overseeing the work of our independent registered public accounting firm and pre-approving all audit services they provide;

 

Approving all permitted non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm;

 

Establishing policies and procedures for engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm for permitted audit and non-audit services;

 

Evaluating the qualifications, independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm;

62


 

Reviewing the design, implementation, adequacy and effectiveness of our internal accounting controls and our critical accounting policies;

 

Discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the results of our annual audit and the review of our quarterly unaudited financial statements;

 

Reviewing the scope and plan of our independent registered public accounting firm and their effective use of audit resources;

 

Reviewing with management and independent auditors their significant audit findings, and assess the steps that management has taken or proposes to take to minimize significant risks or exposures facing the Company, and periodically review compliance with such steps;

 

Establishing procedures for the Company’s confidential and anonymous receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding the Company’s accounting, internal controls and auditing matters, as well as for the confidential, anonymous submissions by Company employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;

 

Obtaining the advice and assistance, as appropriate, of independent counsel and other advisors as necessary to fulfill the responsibilities of the audit committee, and receive appropriate funding from the Company, as determined by the audit committee, for the payment of compensation to any such advisors;

 

Reviewing, overseeing and monitoring the integrity of our financial statements and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate to financial statements or accounting matters; and

 

Reviewing and evaluating, at least annually, the performance of the audit committee and its members including compliance of the audit committee with its charter.

The members of our audit committee are Mr. Raun, Mr. Harrison and Ms. Sentovich. Mr. Raun serves as the chairperson of the committee. All members of our audit committee meet the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and The Nasdaq Capital Market. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Raun is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable SEC rules and has the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the applicable Nasdaq rules and regulations. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Raun, Mr. Harrison and Ms. Sentovich are independent under the applicable rules of the SEC and The Nasdaq Capital Market. Under the applicable Nasdaq Capital Market rules, we are permitted to phase in our compliance with the independent audit committee requirements of The Nasdaq Capital Market on the same schedule as we are permitted to phase in our compliance with the independent audit committee requirements pursuant to Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act which require: (1) one independent member at the time of listing, (2) a majority of independent members within 90 days of listing and (3) all independent members within one year of listing. We are currently in compliance with Nasdaq rules and Rule 10A-3 due to the fact that all members of our audit committee have been deemed independent by our board of directors. The audit committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and The Nasdaq Capital Market.

Compensation Committee

Our compensation committee approves, or recommends to our board of directors, policies relating to compensation and benefits of our officers and employees. The compensation committee approves, or recommends to our board of directors, annual and long-term corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our chief executive officer and other executive officers, evaluates the performance of these officers in light of those goals and objectives and approves, or recommends to our board of directors, the compensation of these officers based on such evaluations. The compensation committee also approves, or recommends to our board of directors, the issuance of stock options and other awards under our equity plan. The compensation committee will review and evaluate, at least annually, the performance of the compensation committee and its members, including compliance by the compensation committee with its charter.

63


The members of our compensation committee are Mr. Harrison, Mr. Potashner, and Ms. Sentovich. Mr. Harrison serves as the chairperson of the committee. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Harrison, Mr. Potashner, and Ms. Sentovich are independent under the applicable rules and regulations of The Nasdaq Capital Market and all current members qualify as a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Our board of directors has determined that each of the members of our compensation committee is an “outside director” as that term is defined in Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or Section 162(m). Under the applicable Nasdaq Capital Market rules, we are permitted to phase in our compliance with the independent compensation committee requirements of The Nasdaq Capital Market which require: (1) one independent member at the time of listing, (2) a majority of independent members within 90 days of listing and (3) all independent members within one year of listing. We are currently in compliance with Nasdaq rules due to the fact that all members of our compensation committee have been deemed independent by our board of directors. The compensation committee operates under a written charter, which the compensation committee will review and evaluate at least annually.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for assisting our board of directors in discharging the board of directors’ responsibilities regarding the identification of qualified candidates to become board members, the selection of nominees for election as directors at our annual meetings of stockholders (or special meetings of stockholders at which directors are to be elected), and the selection of candidates to fill any vacancies on our board of directors and any committees thereof. In addition, the nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for overseeing our corporate governance policies, reporting and making recommendations to our board of directors concerning governance matters and oversight of the evaluation of our board of directors.

The members of our nominating and corporate governance committee are Mr. Potashner, Mr. Raun, and Mr. Harrison. Mr. Potashner serves as the chairman of the committee. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Potashner, Mr. Raun, and Mr. Harrison and are independent under the applicable rules and regulations of The Nasdaq Capital Market relating to nominating and corporate governance committee independence. Under the applicable Nasdaq Capital Market rules, we are permitted to phase in our compliance with the independent nominating and corporate governance committee requirements of The Nasdaq Capital Market which require: (1) one independent member at the time of listing, (2) a majority of independent members within 90 days of listing and (3) all independent members within one year of listing. We are currently in compliance with Nasdaq rules due to the fact that all members of our nominating and corporate governance committee have been deemed independent by our board of directors. The nominating and corporate governance committee operates under a written charter, which the nominating and corporate governance committee will review and evaluate at least annually.

Board Diversity

Our nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for reviewing with the board of directors, on an annual basis, the appropriate characteristics, skills and experience required for the board of directors as a whole and its individual members. In evaluating the suitability of individual candidates (both new candidates and current members), the nominating and corporate governance committee, in recommending candidates for election, and the board of directors, in approving (and, in the case of vacancies, appointing) such candidates, will take into account many factors, including the following:

 

Personal and professional integrity, ethics and values;

 

Experience in corporate management, such as serving as an officer or former officer of a publicly-held company;

 

Experience as a board member or executive officer of another publicly-held company;

 

Strong finance experience;

 

Diversity of expertise and experience in substantive matters pertaining to our business relative to other board members;

 

Diversity of background and perspective, including, but not limited to, with respect to age, gender, race, place of residence and specialized experience;

64


 

Experience relevant to our business industry and with relevant social policy concerns; and

 

Relevant academic expertise or other proficiency in an area of our business operations.

Currently, our board of directors evaluates each individual in the context of the board of directors as a whole, with the objective of assembling a group that can best maximize the success of the business and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its diversity of experience in these various areas.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer, controller, or persons performing similar functions. Our code of business conduct and ethics is available under the Investors – Corporate Governance section of our website at www.onestopsystems.com. In addition, we post on our website all disclosures that are required by law or the listing standards of The Nasdaq Capital Market concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the code. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained at or available through our website, and should not consider it to be a part of this Annual Report.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of 10% or more of our common stock, or reporting persons, are required to report to the SEC on a timely basis the initiation of their status as a reporting person and any changes with respect to their beneficial ownership of our common stock. Based solely on our review of copies of such forms that we have received, or written representations from reporting persons, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, all executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders complied with all applicable filing requirements, other than a late Form 4 filed on December 11, 2018 by Jim Ison and a late Form 4 filed on December 12, 2018 by Steve Cooper.  On February 13, 2019, the Board of Directors authorized the granting of RSU’s to board members and the executive leadership team as part of the annual review of compensation.  The filing of the related Form 4’s was not completed until March 21, 2019.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

This section discusses the material components of the executive compensation program for our executive officers who are named in the “Summary Compensation Table” below. In 2018, our “named executive officers” and their positions were as follows:

 

Steve Cooper, President and Chief Executive Officer;

 

John W. Morrison Jr. Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

Jim Ison, VP of Sales.

This discussion may contain forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans, considerations, expectations and determinations regarding future compensation programs. Actual compensation programs that we adopt in the future may differ materially from the currently planned programs summarized in this discussion.

65


Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding the total compensation for services rendered in all capacities that was earned by each individual who served as our principal executive officer at any time in 2018, and our two other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2018.  These individuals are our named executive officers for 2018.

 

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary ($)

 

 

Bonus ($)

 

 

Option Awards

($) (1)

 

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)

 

 

All Other

Compensation

($) (2)

 

 

Total ($)

 

Steve Cooper

 

2018

 

$

300,984

 

 

$

38,523

 

 

$

125,100

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

34,731

 

 

$

499,338

 

President and Chief

   Executive Officer

 

2017

 

$

296,138

 

 

$

197,568

 

 

$

38,250

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

39,252

 

 

$

571,208

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jim Ison

 

2018

 

$

221,587

 

 

$

14,799

 

 

$

41,700

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

30,097

 

 

$

308,183

 

VP of Sales

 

2017

 

$

217,417

 

 

$

70,316

 

 

$

17,000

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

31,056

 

 

$

335,789

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John W. Morrison Jr.

 

2018

 

$

247,083

 

 

$

16,131

 

 

$

413,000

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

33,199

 

 

$

709,413

 

Chief Financial Officer (3)

 

2017

 

$

83,333

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

6,004

 

 

$

89,337

 

 

(1)

Amounts reflect the full grant-date fair value of stock awards granted during the relevant fiscal year computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, rather than the amounts paid to or realized by the named individual. We provide information regarding the assumptions used to calculate the value of all stock awards and option awards made to our officers in Note 9 to the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.

(2)

Represents payment of health insurance premiums and 401(k) contributions.

(3)

Mr. Morrison was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company on September 1, 2017.

Narrative Disclosure to Compensation Tables

Employment Agreements

We have entered into employment agreements with each of our named executive officers (the “Executives”) as of October 1, 2017. Prior to October 1, 2017, we did not have written employment agreements with our executive officers.

Executive Employment Agreement with Steve Cooper

Mr. Cooper is entitled to a base salary of $345,000, as approved by the Board of Directors on February 13, 2019, and subsequent annual increases as determined by the compensation committee and a target quarterly bonus in the amount of 50% of his quarterly base salary. The target quarterly bonus is based on Mr. Cooper’s performance, as determined by the board of directors in its sole discretion, against fundamental corporate and/or individual objectives to be determined by the board of directors. Mr. Cooper is eligible to participate in our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan subject to the discretion of the board of directors if and when the board of directors determines to make a grant to him.

66


Under the terms of the employment agreement with Mr. Cooper, if we terminate his employment without cause (as defined below) or he resigns for good reason (as defined below) at any time other than within three (3) months immediately preceding or twelve (12) months immediately following the effective date of a change in control (as defined below), he is entitled to the following payments and benefits: (1) his fully earned but unpaid base salary through the date of termination at the rate then in effect, plus all other amounts under any compensation plan or practice to which he is entitled; (2) severance payments in an aggregate amount up to twelve (12) months of Mr. Cooper’s then-current Base Salary, paid to Mr. Cooper on OSS’s regular paydays until the earlier of (i) the date that is twelve (12) months following his termination or (ii) the date as of which he commences employment with another employer, subject to standard payroll deductions and withholdings; (3) a lump sum payment equal to Mr. Cooper’s then-current target bonus; (4) the continuation of Mr. Cooper’s group health continuation coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986 (“COBRA”) at OSS’s expense for a period of twelve (12) months following the termination date; provided, however , that in the event Mr. Cooper becomes eligible for comparable group insurance coverage in connection with new employment, such COBRA premium payments by OSS shall terminate immediately; and (5) the automatic acceleration of the vesting and exercisability of his equity awards and stock options. Mr. Cooper must provide a release and waiver to OSS as a condition of receiving benefits (2)-(5) set forth in this paragraph.

In the event Mr. Cooper’s termination without cause or resignation for good reason occurs within the three (3) months immediately preceding or twelve (12) months immediately following a change in control, he is entitled to the following payments and benefits: (1) a single lump-sum payment in an amount equal to twelve (12) months of Mr. Cooper’s then-current base salary, subject to standard payroll deductions and withholdings, payable within ten (10) business days of the date the release and waiver becomes effective; and (2) provided that Mr. Cooper timely elect such coverage, the continuation of Mr. Cooper’s group health continuation coverage under COBRA at OSS’s expense for a period of twelve (12) months following the termination date; provided, however, that in the event Mr. Cooper becomes eligible for comparable group insurance coverage in connection with new employment, such COBRA premium payments by OSS shall terminate immediately; and (3) the vesting of the shares subject to each of Mr. Cooper’s equity awards and stock options shall be accelerated such that one hundred percent (100%) of said shares shall be deemed fully-vested and, if applicable, immediately exercisable effective as of the date of such termination.

If Mr. Cooper’s employment is terminated as a result of his death or following his permanent disability, Mr. Cooper or his estate, as applicable, is entitled to the following payments and benefits: (1) his fully earned but unpaid base salary through the date of termination at the rate then in effect, plus all other amounts under any compensation plan, expense reimbursement or practice to which he is entitled; (2) a lump sum cash payment in an amount equal to his “earned” bonus for the calendar quarter during which his date of termination occurs calculated as of the date of termination (wherein “earned” means that he has met the applicable bonus metrics as of date of such termination, as determined by the board of directors), prorated for such portion of the calendar quarter during which such termination occurs that has elapsed through the date of termination; and (3) a one-time payment of $500,000.

Executive Employment Agreement with John Morrison

Mr. Morrison is entitled to a base salary of $275,000, as approved by the Board of Directors on February 13, 2019, and subsequent annual increases as determined by the compensation committee and a target quarterly bonus in the amount of 35% of his quarterly base salary. The target quarterly bonus is based on Mr. Morrison’s performance, as determined by the board of directors in its sole discretion, against fundamental corporate and/or individual objectives to be determined by the board of directors. Mr. Morrison is eligible to participate in our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan subject to the discretion of the board of directors if and when the board of directors determines to make a grant to him.

67


Under the terms of the employment agreement with Mr. Morrison, if we terminate his employment without cause (as defined below) or he resigns for good reason (as defined below) at any time other than within three (3) months immediately preceding or twelve (12) months immediately following the effective date of a change in control (as defined below), he is entitled to the following payments and benefits: (1) his fully earned but unpaid base salary through the date of termination at the rate then in effect, plus all other amounts under any compensation plan or practice to which he is entitled; (2) severance payments in an aggregate amount up to six (6) months of Mr. Morrison’s then-current Base Salary, paid to Mr. Morrison on OSS’s regular paydays until the earlier of (i) the date that is six (6) months following his termination or (ii) the date as of which he commences employment with another employer, subject to standard payroll deductions and withholdings; (3) a lump sum payment equal to Mr. Morrison’s then-current target bonus; (4) the continuation of Mr. Morrison’s group health continuation coverage under COBRA at OSS’s expense for a period of six (6) months following the termination date; provided, however , that in the event Mr. Morrison becomes eligible for comparable group insurance coverage in connection with new employment, such COBRA premium payments by OSS shall terminate immediately; and (5) the automatic acceleration of the vesting and exercisability of his equity awards and stock options. Mr. Morrison must provide a release and waiver to OSS as a condition of receiving benefits (2)-(5) set forth in this paragraph.

In the event Mr. Morrison’s termination without cause or resignation for good reason occurs within the three (3) months immediately preceding or twelve (12) months immediately following a change in control, he is entitled to the following payments and benefits: (1) a single lump-sum payment in an amount equal to six (6) months of Mr. Morrison’s then-current base salary, subject to standard payroll deductions and withholdings, payable within ten (10) business days of the date the release and waiver becomes effective; and (2) provided that Mr. Morrison timely elect such coverage, the continuation of Mr. Morrison’s group health continuation coverage under COBRA at OSS’s expense for a period of six (6) months following the termination date; provided, however, that in the event Mr. Morrison becomes eligible for comparable group insurance coverage in connection with new employment, such COBRA premium payments by OSS shall terminate immediately; and (3) the vesting of the shares subject to each of Mr. Morrison’s equity awards and stock options shall be accelerated such that one hundred percent (100%) of said shares shall be deemed fully-vested and, if applicable, immediately exercisable effective as of the date of such termination.

If Mr. Morrison’s employment is terminated as a result of his death or following his permanent disability, Mr. Morrison or his estate, as applicable, is entitled to the following payments and benefits: (1) his fully earned but unpaid base salary through the date of termination at the rate then in effect, plus all other amounts under any compensation plan, expense reimbursement or practice to which he is entitled; and (2) a lump sum cash payment in an amount equal to his “earned” bonus for the calendar quarter during which his date of termination occurs calculated as of the date of termination (wherein “earned” means that he has met the applicable bonus metrics as of date of such termination, as determined by the board of directors), prorated for such portion of the calendar quarter during which such termination occurs that has elapsed through the date of termination.

Executive Employment Agreement with Jim Ison

Mr. Ison is entitled to a base salary of $255,000, as approved by the Board of Directors on February 13, 2019, and subsequent annual increases as determined by the compensation committee and a target quarterly bonus in the amount of 25% of his quarterly base salary. The target quarterly bonus is based on Mr. Ison’s performance, as determined by the board of directors in its sole discretion, against fundamental corporate and/or individual objectives to be determined by the board of directors. Mr. Ison is eligible to participate in our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan subject to the discretion of the board of directors if and when the board of directors determines to make a grant to him.

Under the terms of the employment agreement with Mr. Ison, if we terminate his employment without cause (as defined below) or he resigns for good reason (as defined below) at any time other than within three (3) months immediately preceding or twelve (12) months immediately following the effective date of a change in control (as defined below), he is entitled to the following payments and benefits: (1) his fully earned but unpaid base salary through the date of termination at the rate then in effect, plus all other amounts under any compensation plan or practice to which he is entitled; (2) severance payments in an aggregate amount up to six (6) months of Mr. Ison’s then-current Base Salary, paid to Mr. Ison on OSS’s regular paydays until the earlier of (i) the date that is six (6) months following his termination or (ii) the date as of which he commences employment with another employer,

68


subject to standard payroll deductions and withholdings; (3) a lump sum payment equal to Mr. Ison’s then-current target bonus; (4) the continuation of Mr. Ison’s group health continuation coverage under COBRA at OSS’s expense for a period of six (6) months following the termination date; provided, however , that in the event Mr. Ison becomes eligible for comparable group insurance coverage in connection with new employment, such COBRA premium payments by OSS shall terminate immediately; and (5) the automatic acceleration of the vesting and exercisability of his equity awards and stock options. Mr. Ison must provide a release and waiver to OSS as a condition of receiving benefits (2)-(5) set forth in this paragraph.

In the event Mr. Ison’s termination without cause or resignation for good reason occurs within the three (3) months immediately preceding or twelve (12) months immediately following a change in control, he is entitled to the following payments and benefits: (1) a single lump-sum payment in an amount equal to six (6) months of Mr. Ison’s then-current base salary, subject to standard payroll deductions and withholdings, payable within ten (10) business days of the date the release and waiver becomes effective; and (2) provided that Mr. Ison timely elect such coverage, the continuation of Mr. Ison’s group health continuation coverage under COBRA at OSS’s expense for a period of six (6) months following the termination date; provided, however, that in the event Mr. Ison becomes eligible for comparable group insurance coverage in connection with new employment, such COBRA premium payments by OSS shall terminate immediately; and (3) the vesting of the shares subject to each of Mr. Ison’s equity awards and stock options shall be accelerated such that one hundred percent (100%) of said shares shall be deemed fully-vested and, if applicable, immediately exercisable effective as of the date of such termination.

If Mr. Ison’s employment is terminated as a result of his death or following his permanent disability, Mr. Ison or his estate, as applicable, is entitled to the following payments and benefits: (1) his fully earned but unpaid base salary through the date of termination at the rate then in effect, plus all other amounts under any compensation plan, expense reimbursement or practice to which he is entitled; and (2) a lump sum cash payment in an amount equal to his “earned” bonus for the calendar quarter during which his date of termination occurs calculated as of the date of termination (wherein “earned” means that he has met the applicable bonus metrics as of date of such termination, as determined by the board of directors), prorated for such portion of the calendar quarter during which such termination occurs that has elapsed through the date of termination.

Defined Terms Applicable to Executive Employment Agreements

For purposes of executive employment agreements, “change in control” shall mean:

(i) The direct or indirect sale or transfer, in a single transaction or a series of related transactions, by the stockholders of the Company of voting securities, in which the holders of the outstanding voting securities of the Company immediately prior to such transaction or series of transactions hold, as a result of holding Company securities prior to such transaction, in the aggregate, securities possessing less than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power all outstanding voting securities of the Company or of the acquiring entity immediately after such transaction or series of related transactions;

(ii) A merger or consolidation in which the Company is not the surviving entity, except for a transaction in which the holders of the outstanding voting securities of the Company immediately prior to such merger or consolidation hold as a result of holding Company securities prior to such transaction, in the aggregate, securities possessing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of all outstanding voting securities of the surviving entity (or the parent of the surviving entity) immediately after such merger or consolidation;

(iii) A reverse merger in which the Company is the surviving entity but in which the holders of the outstanding voting securities of the Company immediately prior to such merger hold as a result of holding Company securities prior to such transaction, in the aggregate, securities possessing less than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of all outstanding voting securities of the Company or of the acquiring entity immediately after such merger;

(iv) The sale, transfer or other disposition (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, except for a transaction in which the holders of the outstanding voting securities of the Company immediately prior to such transaction(s) receive as a distribution with respect to securities of the Company, in the aggregate, securities possessing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of all outstanding voting securities of the acquiring entity immediately after such transaction(s); or

69


(v) Any time individuals who, on the date this Plan is adopted by the board of directors, are members of the board of directors (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the members of the input/output; provided, however , that if the appointment or election (or nomination for election) of any new board member was approved or recommended by a majority vote of the members of the Incumbent Board then still in office, such new member shall, for purposes of this Plan, be considered as a member of the Incumbent Board.

For purposes of the executive employment agreements, “cause” means as determined in the sole discretion of the board of directors following written notice of the condition(s) believed to constitute cause, which notice shall briefly describe such condition(s), one or more of the following condition(s): (i) Executive’s failure to substantially perform Executive’s job duties (other than any such failure resulting from Executive’s incapacity due to physical or mental illness or any such actual or anticipated failure after his issuance of written notice of the occurrence of an event alleged by Executive to constitute good reason); (ii) Executive’s failure to comply with all material applicable laws in performing Executive’s job duties or in directing the conduct of OSS’s business; (iii) Executive’s commission of any felony or intentionally fraudulent acts against OSS, its affiliates, executives, agents or customers; (iv) Executive’s participation in any activity that is directly competitive with or intentionally injurious to OSS or any of its affiliates or which violates the terms of Executive’s proprietary information and inventions agreement; (iv) Executive’s material breach of the terms of Executive’s proprietary information and inventions agreement; (v) Executive’s commission of any act of fraud, embezzlement or dishonesty against OSS or any of its affiliates, or use or intentional appropriation for Executive’s personal use or benefit of any funds or material properties of OSS or any of its affiliates not authorized by the board of directors to be so used or appropriated; (vi) Executive’s breach of any material provision of the employment agreement; and (vii) Executive’s gross negligence, insubordination or material violation of any duty of loyalty to OSS or any other demonstrable material misconduct on the part of Executive; provided, however, that, termination by OSS under subsections (i) or (vi) of this Section 3.8(c), shall only be deemed for “cause” pursuant to the foregoing definition if Executive fails to remedy such condition(s) within thirty (30) days following delivery of the notice of termination for cause.

For purposes of the executive employment agreements, “good reason” means the occurrence of any of the following events without Executive’s consent: (i) a material adverse change in Executive’s duties, authority or responsibilities relative to the duties, authority or responsibilities in effect immediately prior to such reduction, or, as it relates to Mr. Cooper, the removal of Executive as chief executive officer of OSS; provided, however, that a reduction in duties, position or responsibilities solely by virtue of OSS being acquired and made part of a larger entity (as, for example, when Executive retains a similar position with a subsidiary of the acquiring entity following a change in control, but Executive does not hold the same position in the acquiring entity) shall not constitute “good reason;” and, provided, further that Executive’s removal from the board of directors shall not constitute “good reason;” (ii) a material diminution in Executive’s base compensation; or (iii) a material breach by OSS of its obligations under this Agreement; provided, however, that, such termination by Executive shall only be deemed for “good reason” pursuant to the foregoing definition if: (A) Executive gives OSS written notice of Executive’s intent to terminate for good reason within sixty (60) days following the first occurrence of the condition(s) that Executive believes constitute(s) good reason, which notice shall describe such condition(s); (B) OSS fails to remedy such condition(s) within thirty (30) days following receipt of the written notice (the “Cure Period”); and (C) Executive voluntarily terminates Executive’s employment within sixty (60) days following the end of the Cure Period.

Annual Cash Bonus

For 2018 and 2017, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Ison and Mr. Morrison were eligible for bonuses. The executives’ bonuses for 2018 were determined at the discretion of our board of directors based on its assessment of our corporate performance. Based on this assessment, our board of directors determined to award and paid Mr. Cooper a bonus of $38,523 and $197,568 for 2018 and 2017, representing 12.8% and 66.7% of his paid salary for 2018 and 2017; Mr. Ison a bonus of $14,799 and $70,316, representing 6.6% and 32.3% of his paid salary for 2018 and 2017 and Mr. Morrison received a bonus of $16,131 and $0, of his paid salary representing 6.5% and 0% respectively for 2018 and 2017.

70


Equity Compensation

We primarily offer stock options to our named executive officers as the long-term incentive component of our compensation program. Our stock options allow employees to purchase shares of our common stock at a price per share equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and may or may not be intended to qualify as “incentive stock options” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In the past, our board of directors has determined the fair market value of our common stock based upon inputs including valuation reports prepared by third-party valuation firms from time to time. Generally, the stock options we grant vest over three years, subject to the employee’s continued employment with us on the vesting date.

On April 18, 2017, Mr. Cooper received a stock option to purchase 45,000 shares of our common stock. The option vests over three years, with 1/3 of the shares subject to the option vested upon the anniversary of the date of grant and the remainder vesting in equal quarterly installments over a period of two years thereafter, subject to his continued employment with us on each vesting date. The options were granted with an exercise price per share of $1.95, which was equal to the fair market value per share of our common stock at the time of the grant, as determined by our board of directors. The option has a term of ten years from the date of grant.

On April 11, 2018, Mr. Cooper received a restricted stock unit (RSU’s) grant of 30,000 shares of our common stock.   The RSU’s vest over three years, with equal quarterly installments over a period of three years, subject to his continued employment with us on each vesting date.

On April 18, 2017, Mr. Ison received a stock option to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock. The option vests over three years, with 1/3 of the shares subject to the option vested upon the anniversary of the date of grant and the remainder vesting in equal quarterly installments over a period of two years thereafter, subject to his continued employment with us on each vesting date. The options were granted with an exercise price per share of $1.95, which was equal to the fair market value per share of our common stock at the time of the grant, as determined by our board of directors. The option has a term of ten years from the date of grant.

On April 11, 2018, Mr. Ison received a restricted stock unit (RSU’s) grant of 10,000 shares of our common stock.   The RSU’s vest over three years, with equal quarterly installments over a period of three years, subject to his continued employment with us on each vesting date.

On April 11, 2018, Mr. Morrison received a restricted stock unit (RSU’s) grant of 50,000 shares of our common stock.   The RSU’s vests over three years, with 1/3 of the shares subject to the option vested upon the anniversary of the date of initial employment and the remainder vesting in equal quarterly installments over a period of two years thereafter, subject to his continued employment with us on each vesting date.

On July 2, 2018, Mr. Morrison received a restricted stock unit (RSU’s) grant of 50,000 shares of our common stock.   The RSU’s vests over three years, with 1/3 of the shares subject to the option vested upon the anniversary of the date of initial employment and the remainder vesting in equal quarterly installments over a period of two years thereafter, subject to his continued employment with us on each vesting date.

Stock awards granted to our named executive officers may be subject to accelerated vesting in certain circumstances. For additional discussion, please see “– Employment Agreements” above and “– Change in Control Benefits” below.

Prior to our initial public offering, we adopted a 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, in order to facilitate the grant of cash and equity incentives to directors, employees (including our named executive officers) and consultants of our company and certain of its affiliates and to enable our company and certain of its affiliates to obtain and retain services of these individuals, which is essential to our long-term success. For additional information about the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, please see the section titled “Incentive Award Plans” below.

71


Other Elements of Compensation

Retirement Plans

We have a 401(k) retirement plan. Under the terms of the plan, eligible employees may defer up to 20% of their pre-tax earnings, subject to the Internal Revenue Service annual contribution limit. Additionally, the Plan allows for discretionary matching contributions by us. In 2018 and 2017, the matching contribution was increased to 100% of the employee’s contribution up to a maximum of 5% of the employee’s annual compensation.

Employee Benefits and Perquisites

Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in our health and welfare plans which include health, vision, dental and life insurance and our 401(k) plan.

Change in Control Benefits

Our named executive officers may become entitled to certain benefits or enhanced benefits in connection with a change in control of our company. Each of our named executive officers’ employment agreements entitles them to accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards, as well as certain other benefits, upon a change in control of our company. For additional discussion, please see “Employment Agreements” above.

72


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table summarizes the number of shares of common stock underlying outstanding equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2018.

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

Name

 

Grant

Date

 

Number of

securities

underlying

unexercised

options (#)

exercisable

 

 

Number of

securities

underlying

unexercised

options (#)

unexercisable

 

Equity

Incentive

plan

awards:

Number of

securities

underlying

unexercised

unearned

options

(#)

 

 

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

 

 

Option

expiration

date

 

Number

of shares

or units of

stock that

have not

vested (#)

 

 

Market

value

of shares

of units

of stock

that have

not

vested ($)

 

 

Equity

Incentive

plan

awards:

Number of

unearned

shares,

units or

other rights

that have

not

vested (#)

 

Equity

Incentive

plan

awards:

Market or

payout

value of

unearned

share,

units or

other right

that have

not

vested ($)

Steve Cooper

 

5/14/2009

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.75

 

 

5/13/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/7/2011

 

 

200,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.76

 

 

12/6/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/18/2012

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.76

 

 

1/17/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7/16/2014

 

 

180,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.46

 

 

7/15/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/2/2016

 

 

75,000

 

 

 

 

 

15,000

 

 

$

1.08

 

 

4/1/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/18/2017

 

 

22,499

 

 

 

 

 

22,501

 

 

$

1.95

 

 

4/17/2027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/11/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/10/2028

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

48,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jim Ison

 

10/1/2012

 

 

34,197

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.76

 

 

9/30/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7/16/2014

 

 

50,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.46

 

 

7/15/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/2/2016

 

 

20,833

 

 

 

 

 

4,167

 

 

$

1.08

 

 

4/1/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/18/2017

 

 

9,999

 

 

 

 

 

10,001

 

 

$

1.95

 

 

4/17/2027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/11/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/10/2028

 

 

8,334

 

 

 

16,168

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John W. Morrison

   Jr. (1)

 

4/11/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/10/2028

 

 

29,167

 

 

 

56,584

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7/1/2028

 

 

29,167

 

 

 

56,584

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Mr. Morrison was appointed chief financial officer of the Company on September 1, 2017.  No equity awards were issued to Mr. Morrison in 2017.

Directors Compensation

Mr. Cooper, who is our chief executive officer, received no compensation for his service as a director. The compensation received by Mr. Cooper as an officer is presented in “Executive Compensation – Summary Compensation Table.”

73


The following table sets forth information for the year ended December 31, 2018, regarding the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our non-employee directors who served on our board of directors during 2018.  

 

Name

 

Fees

earned

or paid in

cash ($)

 

 

Stock

awards ($)

 

RSU

Awards

awards ($)

 

 

Non-equity

incentive

plan

compensation ($)

 

Nonqualified

deferred

compensation

earnings ($)

 

All other

compensation

($)

 

Total ($)

 

Randy Jones

 

$

19,075

 

 

 

 

$

31,350

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

50,425

 

John Reardon

 

$

19,075

 

 

 

 

$

31,350

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

50,425

 

Ken Potashner

 

$

19,075

 

 

 

 

$

31,350

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

50,425

 

Bill Carpenter (1)

 

$

6,932

 

 

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

6,932

 

David Raun

 

$

19,075

 

 

 

 

$

31,350

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

50,425

 

Jack Harrison

 

$

19,075

 

 

 

 

$

31,350

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

50,425

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)  Mr. Carpenter elected not to stand for re-election to the board effective May 22, 2018

 

 

Stock Option Plans

2017 Equity Incentive Plan

Our board of directors adopted our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan on October 10, 2017 (the “2017 Plan”). Our 2017 Plan allows for the grant of a variety of equity vehicles to provide flexibility in implementing equity awards, including incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock grants, unrestricted stock grants and restricted stock units.

Authorized Shares .    A total of 1,500,000 shares of common stock were authorized under the 2017 Plan.

Plan Administration .    As permitted by the terms of the 2017 Plan, the board of directors has delegated administration of the 2017 Plan to the compensation committee. As used herein with respect to the 2017 Plan, the “Board of Directors” refers to any committee the Board of Directors appoints as well as to the Board of Directors itself. Subject to the provisions of the 2017 Plan, the Board of Directors has the power to construe and interpret the 2017 Plan and awards granted under it and to determine the persons to whom and the dates on which awards will be granted, the number of shares of common stock to be subject to each award, the time or times during the term of each award within which all or a portion of such award may be exercised, the exercise price, the type of consideration and other terms of the award. Subject to the limitations set forth below, the Board of Directors will also determine the exercise price of options granted under the 2017 Plan and, with the consent of any adversely affected option holder, may reduce the exercise price of any outstanding option, cancel an outstanding option in exchange for a new option covering the same or a different number of shares of common stock or another equity award or cash or other consideration, or any other action that is treated as a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles. All decisions, determinations and interpretations by the Board of Directors regarding the 2017 Plan shall be final and binding on all participants or other persons claiming rights under the 2017 Plan or any award.

Options .     Options granted under the 2017 Plan may become exercisable in cumulative increments (“vest”) as determined by the Board of Directors. Such increments may be based on continued service to the Company over a certain period of time, the occurrence of certain performance milestones, or other criteria. Options granted under the 2017 Plan may be subject to different vesting terms. The Board of Directors has the power to accelerate the time during which an option may vest or be exercised. In addition, options granted under the 2017 Plan may permit exercise prior to vesting, but in such event the participant may be required to enter into an early exercise stock purchase agreement that allows the Company to repurchase unvested shares, generally at their exercise price, should the participant’s service terminate before vesting. To the extent provided by the terms of an option, a participant may satisfy any federal, state or local tax withholding obligation relating to the exercise of such option by a cash payment upon exercise, by authorizing the Company to withhold a portion of the stock otherwise issuable to the participant, or by such other method as may be set forth in the option agreement. The maximum term of options under the 2017 Plan is 10 years, except that in certain cases the maximum term of certain incentive stock options is five years. Options under the 2017 Plan generally terminate three months after termination of the participant’s service. Incentive stock options are not transferable except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, provided that a participant may designate a beneficiary who may exercise an option following the participant’s death. Nonstatutory stock options are transferable to the extent provided in the option agreement.

74


Stock Bonuses and Restricted Stock Awards.     Subject to certain limitations, the consideration, if any, for restricted stock unit awards must be at least the par value of our common stock. The consideration for a stock unit award may be payable in any form acceptable to the Board of Directors and permitted under applicable law. The Board of Directors may impose any restrictions or conditions upon the vesting of restricted stock unit awards, or that delay the delivery of the consideration after the vesting of stock unit awards, that it deems appropriate. Restricted stock unit awards are settled in shares of the Company’s common stock. Dividend equivalents may be credited in respect of shares covered by a restricted stock unit award, as determined by the Board of Directors. At the discretion of the Board of Directors, such dividend equivalents may be converted into additional shares covered by the restricted stock unit award . If a restricted stock unit award recipient’s service relationship with the Company terminates, any unvested portion of the restricted stock unit award is forfeited upon the recipient’s termination of service.

Certain Adjustments .    Transactions not involving receipt of consideration by the Company, such as a merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, reincorporation, reclassification, stock dividend, dividend in property other than cash, stock split, liquidating dividend, combination of shares, exchange of shares, or a change in corporate structure may change the type(s), class(es) and number of shares of common stock subject to the 2017 Plan and outstanding awards. In that event, the 2017 Plan will be appropriately adjusted as to the type(s), class(es) and the maximum number of shares of common stock subject to the 2017 Plan and the Section 162(m) Limitation, and outstanding awards will be adjusted as to the type(s), class(es), number of shares and price per share of common stock subject to such awards.

2015 Stock Option Plan

Our board of directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, our 2015 Stock Option Plan in December 2015 (the “2015 Plan”). Our 2015 Plan allows for the grant of incentive stock options, within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, to our employees and our parent and subsidiary corporations’ employees, and for the grant of nonstatutory stock options to our employees, directors and consultants and our parent and subsidiary corporations’ employees, directors and consultants.

Authorized Shares.     A total of 1,500,000 shares of common stock were authorized for grant under the 2015 Plan. Our 2015 Plan was terminated by the board of directors on October 10, 2017, and accordingly, no shares are available for issuance under the 2015 Plan. Our 2015 Plan will continue to govern outstanding awards granted thereunder.

Plan Administration.     Our board of directors or a committee of our board (the administrator) administers our 2015 Plan. Subject to the provisions of the 2015 Plan, the administrator has the full authority and discretion to take any actions it deems necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2015 Plan. The administrator has the power to construe and interpret the terms of our 2015 Plan and awards granted under it, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules relating to our 2015 Plan, including rules and regulations relating to sub-plans, and to determine the terms and conditions of the awards, including the exercise price, the number of shares of our common stock subject to each such award, any vesting acceleration or waiver of forfeiture restrictions, and any restrictions or limitations regarding awards or the shares relating thereto. All decisions, interpretations and other actions of the administrator are final and binding on all participants in the 2015 Plan.

Options.      Stock options may be granted under our 2015 Plan. The exercise price per share of all options must equal at least 100% of the fair market value per share of our common stock on the date of grant, as determined by the administrator. The term of a stock option may not exceed 10 years. With respect to any participant who owns 10% of the voting power of all classes of our outstanding stock as of the grant date, the term of an incentive stock option granted to such participant must not exceed five years and the exercise price per share of such incentive stock option must equal at least 110% of the fair market value per share of our common stock on the date of grant, as determined by the administrator.

75


After termination of an employee, director or consultant, he or she may exercise his or her option for the period of time as specified in the applicable option agreement. If termination is due to death or disability, the option generally will remain exercisable for at least twelve months. In all other cases, the option will generally remain exercisable for at least 90 days. However, an option generally may not be exercised later than the expiration of its term.

Transferability of Options.     Unless our administrator provides otherwise, our 2015 Plan generally does not allow for the transfer or assignment of options, except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.

Certain Adjustments.     In the event of certain changes in our capitalization, in order to prevent diminution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the 2015 Plan, the administrator will adjust the number and class of shares that may be delivered under our 2015 Plan and/or the number, class and price of shares covered by each outstanding award.

2011 Stock Option Plan

Our board of directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, our 2011 Stock Option Plan in December 2011 (the “2011 Plan”). Our 2011 Plan allows for the grant of incentive stock options, within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, to our employees and our parent and subsidiary corporations’ employees, and for the grant of nonstatutory stock options to our employees, directors and consultants and our parent and subsidiary corporations’ employees, directors and consultants.

Authorized Shares.   A total of 1,500,000 shares of common stock were authorized for grant under the 2011 Plan. Our 2011 Plan was terminated by the board of directors on October 10, 2017, and accordingly, no shares are available for issuance under the 2011 Plan. Our 2011 Plan will continue to govern outstanding awards granted thereunder.

Plan Administration.   Our board of directors administers our 2011 Plan. Subject to the provisions of the 2011 Plan, the board of directors has the full authority and discretion to take any actions it deems necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2011 Plan. The board of directors has the power to construe and interpret the terms of our 2011 Plan and awards granted under it, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules relating to our 2011 Plan, including rules and regulations relating to sub-plans, and to determine the terms and conditions of the awards, including the exercise price, the number of shares of our common stock subject to each such award, any vesting acceleration or waiver of forfeiture restrictions, and any restrictions or limitations regarding awards or the shares relating thereto. All decisions, interpretations and other actions of the board of directors are final and binding on all participants in the 2011 Plan.

Options.   Stock options may be granted under our 2011 Plan. The exercise price per share of all options must equal at least 100% of the fair market value per share of our common stock on the date of grant, as determined by the board of directors. The term of a stock option may not exceed 10 years. With respect to any participant who owns 10% of the voting power of all classes of our outstanding stock as of the grant date, the term of an incentive stock option granted to such participant must not exceed five years and the exercise price per share of such incentive stock option must equal at least 110% of the fair market value per share of our common stock on the date of grant, as determined by the board of directors.

After termination of an employee, director or consultant, he or she may exercise his or her option for the period of time as specified in the applicable option agreement. If termination is due to death or disability, the option generally will remain exercisable for at least twelve months. In all other cases, the option will generally remain exercisable for at least 90 days. However, an option generally may not be exercised later than the expiration of its term.

Transferability of Options.    Unless our board of directors provides otherwise, our 2011 Plan generally does not allow for the transfer or assignment of options, except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent permitted by the board of directors, in its discretion, a nonstatutory option shall be assignable or transferable subject to the applicable limitations, if any, described in Rule 701 under the Securities Act.

76


Certain Adjustments.    In the event of certain changes in our capitalization, in order to prevent diminution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the 2011 Plan, the board of directors will adjust the number and class of shares that may be delivered under our 2 Plan and/or the number, class and price of shares covered by each outstanding award.

2000 Stock Option Plan

Our board of directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, our 2000 Stock Option Plan (the “2000 Plan”). Our 2000 Plan allows for the grant of incentive stock options, within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, to our employees and our parent and subsidiary corporations’ employees, and for the grant of nonstatutory stock options to our employees, directors and consultants and our parent and subsidiary corporations’ employees, directors and consultants.

Authorized Shares.     A total of 1,500,000 shares of common stock were authorized for grant under the 2000 Plan. In November 2008, the 2000 Plan was increased to allow for an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares authorized under the plan. Our 2000 Plan expired on its terms in 2010, and accordingly, no shares are available for issuance under the 2000 Plan. Our 2000 Plan will continue to govern outstanding awards granted thereunder.

Plan Administration.     Our board of directors administers our 2000 Plan. Subject to the provisions of the 2000 Plan, the board of directors has the full authority and discretion to take any actions it deems necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2000 Plan. The board of directors has the power to construe and interpret the terms of our 2000 Plan and awards granted under it, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules relating to our 2000 Plan, including rules and regulations relating to sub-plans, and to determine the terms and conditions of the awards, including the exercise price, the number of shares of our common stock subject to each such award, any vesting acceleration or waiver of forfeiture restrictions, and any restrictions or limitations regarding awards or the shares relating thereto. All decisions, interpretations and other actions of the board of directors are final and binding on all participants in the 2000 Plan.

Options.      Under the 2000 Plan, the exercise price per share of all options must equal at least 100% of the fair market value per share of our common stock on the date of grant, as determined by the board of directors. The term of a stock option may not exceed 10 years. With respect to any participant who owns 10% of the voting power of all classes of our outstanding stock as of the grant date, the term of an incentive stock option granted to such participant must not exceed five years and the exercise price per share of such incentive stock option must equal at least 110% of the fair market value per share of our common stock on the date of grant, as determined by the board of directors.

After termination of an employee, director or consultant, he or she may exercise his or her option for the period of time as specified in the applicable option agreement. If termination is due to death or disability, the option generally will remain exercisable for at least twelve months. In all other cases, the option will generally remain exercisable for at least 90 days. However, an option generally may not be exercised later than the expiration of its term.

Transferability of Options.     Unless our board of directors provides otherwise, our 2000 Plan generally does not allow for the transfer or assignment of options, except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent permitted by the board of directors, in its discretion, a nonstatutory option shall be assignable or transferable subject to the applicable limitations, if any, described in Rule 701 under the Securities Act.

Certain Adjustments.     In the event of certain changes in our capitalization, in order to prevent diminution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the 2015 Plan, the board of directors will adjust the number and class of shares that may be delivered under our 2000 Plan and/or the number, class and price of shares covered by each outstanding award.

77


S-8 Registration Statement :

On October 3, 2018, the Company filed a Form S-8 Registration Statement relating to 3,432,525 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share issuable to the employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors of the Company under the Company’s 2017 Plan, 2015 Plan, 2011 Plan, and 2000 Plan.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock, as of February 28, 2019, by:

 

each person, or group of affiliated persons, known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock;

 

each of our named executive officers;

 

each of our directors; and

 

all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with SEC rules. The information does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, the number of shares of common stock deemed outstanding includes shares issuable upon exercise of stock options or warrants held by the respective person or group that may be exercised or converted within 60 days after February 28, 2019. For purposes of calculating each person’s or group’s percentage ownership, stock options and warrants exercisable within 60 days after February 28, 2019 are included for that person or group but not for any other person or group.

Applicable percentage ownership is based on 14,270,268 shares of common stock outstanding at February 28, 2019.

Unless otherwise indicated and subject to applicable community property laws, to our knowledge, each stockholder named in the following table possesses sole voting and investment power over the shares listed. Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each person listed on the table is c/o One Stop Systems, Inc., 2235 Enterprise Street, #110, Escondido, CA 92029.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)

 

Number of Shares of

Common Stock

Beneficially

Owned (2)

 

 

Percent of

Common Stock

Beneficially

Owned

 

5% or greater stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

James Reardon (10)

 

 

1,330,496

 

 

 

9.3

%

AIGH Investment Partners L.P. (11)

 

 

1,037,650

 

 

 

7.3

%

Wasatch Advisors, Inc. (12)

 

 

1,020,580

 

 

 

7.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Named Executive Officer and Directors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steve Cooper (1)

 

 

3,621,644

 

 

 

24.2

%

Randy Jones (2)

 

 

1,313,749

 

 

 

9.2

%

John Reardon (3)

 

 

404,285

 

 

 

2.8

%

Ken Potashner (4)

 

 

379,933

 

 

 

2.6

%

Jack Harrison (5)

 

 

10,000

 

 

*

 

David Raun (6)

 

 

22,500

 

 

*

 

Jim Ison (7)

 

 

131,866

 

 

*

 

John Morrison (8)

 

 

25,086

 

 

*

 

All executive officers and directors as a group

   (8 persons)(9)

 

 

5,909,063

 

 

 

37.8

%

 

*

Less than 1%.

78


(1)

Consists of (i) 2,930,394 shares of common stock held by The Cooper Revocable Trust dated April 25, 2001, and (ii) 688,750 shares of common stock and 2,500 RSU’s that Mr. Cooper has the right to acquire or receive  from us within 60 days of February 28, 2019 pursuant to exercise of stock options. Steve Cooper shares joint voting and investment control of The Cooper Revocable Trust dated April 25, 2001 with his wife Lori Cooper. Mr. Cooper serves as chief executive officer, president and chairman of the board of directors.

(2)

Consists of (i) 1,263,749 shares of common stock held by Randy Jones and Roseann Piazza Jones Revocable Trust, and (ii) 50,000 shares of common stock that Mr. Jones has the right to acquire from us within 60 days of February 28, 2019 pursuant to the exercise of stock options. Randy Jones shares joint voting and investment control of the Randy Jones and Roseann Piazza Jones Revocable Trust. Mr. Jones is a member of the board of directors and consultant with the Company.

(3)

Consists of (i)145,422 shares of common stock held by the Reardon Family Trust dated August 31, 2011 of which Mr. Reardon holds joint voting and investment control with his wife Dawn Reardon, (ii) 88,863 shares of common stock held by The RTC Group, Inc. of which Mr. Reardon exercises sole voting and investment control, and (iii) 170,000 shares of common stock that Mr. Reardon has the right to acquire from us within 60 days of February 28, 2019 pursuant to the exercise of stock options. Mr. Reardon is a member of the board of directors.

(4)

Consists of (i) 70,000 shares of common stock held by Mr. Potashner, (ii)139,933 shares of common stock that Kenco, Inc. has the right to exercise within 60 days of February 28, 201( pursuant to common stock warrants, and (iii) 170,000 shares of common stock that Mr. Potashner has the right to acquire from us within 60 days of February 28, 2019 pursuant to the exercise of stock options. Mr. Potashner has sole voting and investment control over Kenco, Inc. Mr. Potashner is a member of the board of directors.

(5)

Includes 10,000 shares of common stock that Mr. Harrison has the right to acquire from us within 60 days of February 28, 2019 pursuant to the exercise of stock options. Mr. Harrison is a member of the board of directors.

(6)

Consists of (i) 12,500 shares of common stock held by Mr. Raun, (ii) 10,000 shares of common stock the Mr. Raun has the right to acquire from us within 60 days of February 28, 2019 pursuant to the exercise of stock options. Mr. Raun is a member of the board of directors.  

(7)

Consists of (i) 12,252 shares of common stock held by Mr. Ison and (ii) 118,780 shares of common stock and 834 RSU’s that Mr. Ison has the right to acquire or receive from us within 60 days of February 28, 2019 pursuant to the exercise of stock options. Mr. Ison is the VP of Sales for the Company.

(8)

Consists of (i) 16,666 shares of common stock held by Mr. Morrison, (ii) 8,332 of RSU’s that Mr. Morrison has a right to receive. Mr. Morrison is the Chief Financial Officer of the company.

(9)

Includes (i) 4,451,071 shares beneficially owned by our current named executive officers and directors and (ii) 1,357,463shares subject to options, warrants or convertible securities and 11,666 RSU’s that are either exercisable or has a right to receive within 60 days of February 28, 2019, as set forth in the previous footnotes.

(10)

Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on September 10, 2018.  Mr. Reardon is also the President, CDI Division of the Company.

(11)

Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2019.

(12)

Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 15, 2019.

Equity Compensation Plan Information:

 

Plan Category

 

Number of securities to be

issued upon exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights

 

 

Weighted-average exercise

price of outstanding options,

warrants and rights

 

 

Number of securities remaining

available for future issuance

under equity compensation plans

(excluding securities reflected in

column (a))

 

2017 Stock Option Plan

 

 

298,335

 

 

$

3.98

 

 

 

1,157,500

 

2015 Stock Option Plan

 

 

674,458

 

 

$

1.61

 

 

 

-

 

2011 Stock Option Plan

 

 

994,289

 

 

$

0.70

 

 

 

-

 

2000 Stock Option Plan

 

 

175,000

 

 

$

0.65

 

 

 

-

 

Warrants

 

 

578,996

 

 

$

4.32

 

 

 

-

 

79


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE .

We describe below the transactions and series of similar transactions, since January 1, 2016, to which we were a party or will be a party, in which:

 

the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and

 

any of our directors, executive officers, holders of more than 5% of our capital stock or any member of their immediate family had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than equity and other compensation, termination, change in control and other arrangements with directors and executive officers, which are described where required under the section above titled “Executive Compensation.”

SkyScale Joint Venture

On April 6, 2017, OSS and Jacoma Investments, LLC, an entity controlled by our board member Jack Harrison, formed a joint venture named SkyScale, LLC in the State of California. In accordance with the terms of the joint venture, Jacoma Investments, LLC agreed to contribute $750,000 in capital and OSS agreed to contribute $750,000 in the form of credits to purchase equipment, personnel or support services from OSS. Each party received a 50% membership interest in the joint venture. The purpose of SkyScale, LLC is to engage in the business of providing high performance computing capabilities as cloud services. This joint venture is currently winding down and is being accounted for as a discontinued operation.  On December 31, 2018, as a result of changes in the competitive landscape and downward pressure on pricing from large competitors, the members to the SkyScale joint venture agreement agreed to begin the dissolution of SkyScale.

Convertible Note and Warrant Financing

From 2013 through 2016, we sold to investors in private placements an aggregate of $1,600,000 in promissory notes which included 198,996 warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. Via an affiliated entity controlled by him, our director, Kenneth Potashner, lent $1,100,000 in promissory notes and received 139,933 warrants in the private placement for an aggregate exercise price of $135,000. These notes were paid-off from proceeds received in our initial public offering in February 2018.

Management Services Agreement

Effective August 1, 2016, we entered into a management services agreement with a company owned by the former chief executive officer of Magma. The agreement calls for payments of $180,000 per year for the first two years paid in monthly installments. In the third year, the amount is reduced to $37,500 for the year paid in monthly installments. Additionally, we granted 30,000 nonstatutory stock options in conjunction with execution of this agreement with an exercise price of $1.78 per share. Payments for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $120,625 and $180,000, respectively.

Investors’ Rights Agreement

We entered into a second amended and restated investors’ rights agreement in January 2007 with the holders of our preferred stock, including entities with which certain of our directors are affiliated. This agreement provides for certain rights relating to the registration of their shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of their preferred stock, a right of first refusal for certain holders of preferred stock to purchase future securities sold by us and certain additional covenants made by us. Except for the registration rights (including the related provisions pursuant to which we have agreed to indemnify the parties to the investors’ rights agreement), all rights under this agreement terminated upon closing of our initial public offering. The registration rights will continue and will terminate two years following the closing of  our initial public offering, or for any particular holder with registration rights, at such time when such holder may sell all of such shares pursuant to Rule 144(b)(1) under the Securities Act. Our common holders also have certain rights to “piggyback” onto the registration rights provided to our former holders of preferred stock. See “Description of Capital Stock—Registration Rights” for additional information.

80


Personal Guarantees of Chief Executive Officer

Steve Cooper, our CEO, personally guaranteed (by himself personally and/or via a family trust) certain loans and lines of credit held by the Company. Mr. Cooper has personally guaranteed indebtedness owed by OSS pursuant to certain business loans, including related party debt owed to Kenco, Inc. (beneficially owned by our director Kenneth Potashner) and Tim Rueth (stockholder), and also a revolving line of credit with Bank of the West for an aggregate amount of $3,334,508 as of December 31, 2017. Proceeds received from our initial public offering were used to retire these debt obligations and as of March 2, 2018, the line of credit with the Bank of the West was cancelled by the Company, which released Mr. Cooper from such personal guarantees.

Executive Compensation and Employment Arrangements

Please see “Item 11 Executive Compensation” for information on compensation arrangements with our executive officers and agreements with our executive officers containing compensation and termination provisions, among others.

Director and Officer Indemnification and Insurance

We will enter into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers, and we maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. These agreements, among other things, require us or will require us to indemnify each director and executive officer to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, including indemnification of expenses such as attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by the director or executive officer in any action or proceeding, including any action or proceeding by or in right of us, arising out of the person’s services as a director or executive officer.

Our certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws provide that we will indemnify each of our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law. Further, we have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers, and we have purchased a policy of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that insures our directors and officers against the cost of defense, settlement or payment of a judgment under certain circumstances. For further information, see “Executive Compensation—Limitations of Liability and Indemnification Matters.”

Board Committees and Independence

Our board of directors has established three standing committees – audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance – each of which operates under a charter that has been approved by our board of directors.

Policies and Procedures Regarding Related Party Transactions

Our board of directors has adopted a written related person transaction policy setting forth the policies and procedures for the review and approval or ratification of related-person transactions. This policy covers, with certain exceptions set forth in Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act, any transaction, arrangement or relationship, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships in which we were or are to be a participant, where the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and a related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, including, without limitation, purchases of goods or services by or from the related person or entities in which the related person has a material interest, indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness and employment by us of a related person. In reviewing and approving any such transactions, our audit committee is tasked to consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including, but not limited to, whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in an arm’s length transaction and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction. All of the transactions described in this section occurred prior to the adoption of this policy.  

81


ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES .

The Audit Committee of the Board has selected Haskell & White LLP (“H&W”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. H&W has audited our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The aggregate fees for professional services rendered to us by Haskell &White LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm which performed our audits for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, and for other services were as follows:

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Audit fees (1)

 

$

158,470

 

 

$

205,372

 

Audit-Related fees (2)

 

 

145,505

 

 

 

40,274

 

Tax fees

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Other fees

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Total fees

 

$

303,975

 

 

$

245,646

 

 

(1)

Includes fees for (i) audits and reviews of our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, (ii) review of our interim period financial statements for fiscal year 2018, and (iii) fees related to the initial and subsequent review of our registration on Form S-1.

(2)

Includes fees for (i) the pre-acquisition audit of Mission Technologies Group (“Magma”) of the balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholder’s equity (deficit) and cash flows, for the year then ended, and for the period from January 1, 2016 through July 15, 2016 (ii) review procedures of Form 8-K for the acquisitions of CDI and Bressner Technology GmbH.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee pre-approves all auditing services and the terms of non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, but only to the extent that the non-audit services are not prohibited under applicable law and the committee determines that the non-audit services do not impair the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm.

In situations where it is impractical to wait until the next regularly scheduled quarterly meeting, the chairman of the committee has been delegated authority to approve audit and non-audit services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Fees payable to our independent registered public accounting firm for any specific, individual service approved by the chairman pursuant to the above-described delegation of authority may not exceed $25,000, and the chairman is required to report any such approvals to the full committee at its next scheduled meeting. In addition, the Audit Committee has pre-approved a list of acceptable services and fees payable to H & W in an aggregate amount of up to $12,500 per quarter for such services, including without limitation audit and allowable non-audit and tax consulting.  This pre-approval is for small projects needing quick reaction and judged by the Audit Committee not to raise any independence issues with H&W. Such projects and fees are required to be presented in detail at the next Audit Committee meeting.  Fees that were incurred in 2017 and 2018 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee has considered and determined that the provision of the non-audit services described is compatible with maintaining the independence of our registered public accounting firm.

82


PART IV

ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

1.

Financial Statements.

The financial statements of One Stop Systems, Inc., together with the report thereon of Haskell & White LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2.

Financial Statement Schedules.

All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

3.

Exhibits

A list of exhibits is set forth on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

 

83


INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017

F-3

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

F-5

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

F-6

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

F-7

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

F-8

 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-10

 

F-1


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGIST ERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

One Stop Systems, Inc.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of One Stop Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income,  stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the “consolidated financial statements”).  In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits.  We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks.  Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Haskell & White LLP

HASKELL & WHITE LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.

Irvine, California

March 21, 2019

F-2


ONE STOP SYSTEMS, INC. (OSS)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash  and cash equivalents

 

$

2,272,256

 

 

$

185,717

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

10,540,150

 

 

 

5,192,730

 

Inventories, net

 

 

6,823,930

 

 

 

3,696,330

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

666,330

 

 

 

978,428

 

 

 

 

20,302,666

 

 

 

10,053,205

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

1,759,086

 

 

 

1,581,814

 

Deposits and other

 

 

49,966

 

 

 

31,215

 

Deferred tax assets, net

 

 

2,505,632

 

 

 

1,318,447

 

Goodwill

 

 

7,914,211

 

 

 

3,324,128

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

3,525,257

 

 

 

608,405

 

 

 

$

36,056,818

 

 

$

16,917,214

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-3


ONE STOP SYSTEMS, INC. (OSS)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - CONTINUED

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

3,708,865

 

 

$

3,904,613

 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

 

3,930,718

 

 

 

1,933,977

 

Borrowings on bank lines of credit

 

 

422,960

 

 

 

3,334,508

 

Current portion of related-party notes payable, net of debt

   discount of $13,905

 

 

-

 

 

 

136,303

 

Current portion of notes payable, net of debt discount of $9,932

 

 

-

 

 

 

640,079

 

Current portion of notes payable to foreign banks (Note 8)

 

 

1,156,915

 

 

 

-

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

9,219,458

 

 

 

9,949,480

 

Related-party notes payable, net of current portion and debt

   discount of $579

 

 

-

 

 

 

12,696

 

Notes payable, net of current portion and debt discount of $414

 

 

-

 

 

 

335,267

 

Notes payable to foreign banks, net of current portion (Note 8)

 

 

265,038

 

 

 

-

 

Total liabilities

 

 

9,484,496

 

 

 

10,297,443

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series C preferred stock, no par value, convertible;  0 shares and

   2,000,000 shares, respectively authorized; 0 and 1,087,006 issued and

   outstanding respectively; liquidation preference of $1,630,509

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,604,101

 

Series B preferred stock, no par value, convertible; 0 and 1,500,000

   shares, respectively authorized; 0 and 1,450,000 issued and outstanding,

   respectively; liquidation preference of $725,000

 

 

-

 

 

 

697,996

 

Series A preferred stock, no par value, convertible; 0 and 500,000 shares,

   respectively authorized; 0 and 500,000 issued and outstanding,

   respectively; liquidation preference of $125,000

 

 

-

 

 

 

114,430

 

Common stock, $.0001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized;

   14,216,328 and 5,514,917 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

 

1,422

 

 

 

551

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

27,424,113

 

 

 

3,484,428

 

Noncontrolling interest

 

 

500

 

 

 

436,842

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

 

1,142

 

 

 

-

 

Retained (deficit) earnings

 

 

(854,855

)

 

 

281,423

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

26,572,322

 

 

 

6,619,771

 

 

 

$

36,056,818

 

 

$

16,917,214

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-4


ONE STOP SYSTEMS, INC. (OSS)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

For The Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net revenue

 

$

37,027,382

 

 

$

27,538,333

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

25,692,658

 

 

 

18,873,797

 

Gross margin

 

 

11,334,724

 

 

 

8,664,536

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative

 

 

6,513,298

 

 

 

3,502,998

 

Marketing and selling

 

 

3,995,258

 

 

 

2,924,727

 

Research and development

 

 

4,001,757

 

 

 

2,687,249

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

14,510,313

 

 

 

9,114,974

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(3,175,589

)

 

 

(450,438

)

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

(65,693

)

 

 

(199,257

)

Other, net

 

 

271,878

 

 

 

30,440

 

Total other income (expense), net

 

 

206,185

 

 

 

(168,817

)

Loss before benefit from income taxes

 

 

(2,969,404

)

 

 

(619,255

)

Benefit for income taxes

 

 

(1,396,784

)

 

 

(402,717

)

Net loss

 

$

(1,572,620

)

 

$

(216,538

)

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

$

(436,342

)

 

$

(313,158

)

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders

 

$

(1,136,278

)

 

$

96,620

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(0.09

)

 

$

0.02

 

Diluted

 

$

(0.09

)

 

$

0.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

12,586,513

 

 

 

5,449,413

 

Diluted

 

 

12,586,513

 

 

 

10,689,047

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-5


ONE STOP SYSTEMS, INC. (OSS)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

 

 

 

For The Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders

 

$

(1,136,278

)

 

$

96,620

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

19,999

 

 

 

-

 

Change in unrealized (loss) on available for sale investments

 

 

(18,857

)

 

 

-

 

Total other comprehensive income

 

 

1,142

 

 

 

-

 

Comprehensive (loss) income

 

$

(1,135,136

)

 

$

96,620

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

 

 

F-6


ONE STOP SYSTEMS, INC. (OSS)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For The Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

 

 

 

Series C Preferred

Stock

 

 

Series B Preferred

Stock

 

 

Series A Preferred

Stock

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

Other

 

 

Retained

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Paid in

Capital

 

 

Noncontrolling

Interest

 

 

Comprehensive

Income

 

 

(Deficit)

Earnings

 

 

Stockholders'

Equity

 

Balance, January 1, 2017

 

 

1,087,006

 

 

$

1,604,101

 

 

 

1,450,000

 

 

$

697,996

 

 

 

500,000

 

 

$

114,430

 

 

 

5,374,697

 

 

$

537

 

 

$

3,218,878

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

184,803

 

 

$

5,820,745

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

160,062

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

160,062

 

Exercise of stock options

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

140,220

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

105,488

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

105,502

 

Noncontrolling interest in consolidated

   subsidiary (Note 1)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

436,842

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

436,842

 

Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

96,620

 

 

 

96,620

 

Balance, December 31, 2017

 

 

1,087,006

 

 

 

1,604,101

 

 

 

1,450,000

 

 

 

697,996

 

 

 

500,000

 

 

 

114,430

 

 

 

5,514,917

 

 

 

551

 

 

 

3,484,428

 

 

 

436,842

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

281,423

 

 

 

6,619,771

 

Conversion of preferred stock to common

   stock upon initial public offering

 

 

(1,087,006

)

 

 

(1,604,101

)

 

 

(1,450,000

)

 

 

(697,996

)

 

 

(500,000

)

 

 

(114,430

)

 

 

3,037,006

 

 

 

304

 

 

 

2,416,223

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

527,335

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

527,335

 

Exercise of stock options

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

391,578

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

113,129

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

113,168

 

Taxes paid on net issuance of employee

   stock options

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(341,574

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(341,574

)

Fair value of warrants issued to Underwriters

   with IPO

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

669,408

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

669,408

 

Proceeds from issuance of stock, net of

   issuance costs of $3,367,760

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,900,000

 

 

 

390

 

 

 

16,131,850

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

16,132,240

 

Shares issued in acquisition of CDI (Note 3)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,266,364

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

4,194,546

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,194,673

 

Shares issued in acquisition of Bressner

   Technology (Note 3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

106,463

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

228,768

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

228,779

 

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling

   interest in consolidated subsidiary

   (Note 1)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(436,342

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(436,342

)

Currency translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

19,999

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

19,999

 

Unrealized loss

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(18,857

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(18,857

)

Net loss

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,136,278

)

 

 

(1,136,278

)

Balance, December 31, 2018

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

14,216,328

 

 

$

1,422

 

 

$

27,424,113

 

 

$

500

 

 

$

1,142

 

 

$

(854,855

)

 

$

26,572,322

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

 

 

F-7


 

ONE STOP SYSTEMS, INC. (OSS)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

For the years ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(1,572,620

)

 

$

(216,538

)

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

(436,342

)

 

 

(313,158

)

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders

 

 

(1,136,278

)

 

 

96,620

 

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used

   in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

(436,342

)

 

 

(313,158

)

Deferred provision for income taxes

 

 

(1,489,330

)

 

 

(416,614

)

Disposal loss on property and equipment (Note 1)

 

 

406,049

 

 

 

-

 

Provision for bad debt

 

 

(2,939

)

 

 

(1,776

)

Warranty reserves

 

 

15,088

 

 

 

19,005

 

Amortization of deferred gain

 

 

(134,640

)

 

 

(57,675

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

1,350,329

 

 

 

836,274

 

Inventory reserves

 

 

299,388

 

 

 

582,863

 

Amortization of debt discount

 

 

24,830

 

 

 

23,837

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

527,335

 

 

 

160,062

 

Unrealized loss on forward currency contracts

 

 

(18,857

)

 

 

-

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(2,563,523

)

 

 

(254,015

)

Inventories

 

 

46,789

 

 

 

(1,704,134

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

(275,720

)

 

 

(835,350

)

Accounts payable

 

 

(1,460,540

)

 

 

1,278,055

 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

 

938,718

 

 

 

204,240

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

 

(3,909,643

)

 

 

(381,766

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash acquired in acquisitions

 

 

700,865

 

 

 

-

 

Proceeds from sales of property and equipment

 

 

34,450

 

 

 

-

 

Cash paid in acquisition of Concept Development Inc.

 

 

(646,759

)

 

 

-

 

Cash paid in acquisition of Bressner Technology GmbH

 

 

(5,374,582

)

 

 

-

 

Purchases of property and equipment, including capitalization of labor

   costs for tooling and test equipment, (net)

 

 

(623,166

)

 

 

(425,482

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(5,909,192

)

 

 

(425,482

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from stock options exercised

 

 

113,168

 

 

 

105,502

 

Contribution related to non-controlling interest

 

 

-

 

 

 

750,000

 

Payment on working capital loan

 

 

(370,096

)

 

 

 

 

Payment of payroll taxes on net issuance of employee stock options

 

 

(341,574

)

 

 

 

 

Stock issuance costs

 

 

(1,810,902

)

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

 

 

19,500,000

 

 

 

 

 

Net (repayments) borrowings on bank line of credit

 

 

(4,041,243

)

 

 

876,331

 

Payments on related-party notes payable

 

 

(163,483

)

 

 

(134,698

)

Payments on notes payable

 

 

(985,692

)

 

 

(618,367

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

11,900,178

 

 

 

978,768

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

2,081,343

 

 

 

171,520

 

Effect of exchange rates on cash

 

 

5,196

 

 

 

-

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

 

 

185,717

 

 

 

14,197

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 

$

2,272,256

 

 

$

185,717

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-8


 

ONE STOP SYSTEMS, INC. (OSS)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED

 

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the year for interest

 

$

41,138

 

 

$

167,255

 

Cash paid during the year for income taxes

 

$

7,626

 

 

$

49,508

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of Bressner Technology GmbH through issuance of common

   stock (Note 3)

 

$

228,779

 

 

$

-

 

Acquisition of CDI through issuance of common stock (Note 3)

 

$

4,194,673

 

 

$

-

 

Fair value of warrants issued in connection with initial public offering

 

$

669,408

 

 

$

-

 

Reclassification of prepaid IPO expenses to additional paid in capital

 

$

887,450

 

 

$

-

 

Disposal of obsolete inventory

 

$

947,400

 

 

$

867,538

 

Change in labor and overhead applied to inventory

 

$

957,694

 

 

$

(149,014

)

Fixed assets received from SkyScale in dissolution

 

$

160,000

 

 

$

-

 

Reclassification of inventories to property and equipment

 

$

-

 

 

$

645,909

 

Deferred revenue on gain from bargain purchase ( Note 3)

 

$

-

 

 

$

230,700

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-9


 

ONE STOP SYSTEMS, INC. (OSS)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

 

NOTE 1 – THE COMPANY AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Nature of Operations

One Stop Systems, Inc. (“we,” “our,” “OSS,” or the “Company”) was originally incorporated as a California corporation in 1999 after initially being formed as a California limited liability company in 1998. On December 14, 2017, the Company was reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in connection with its initial public offering.  The Company designs, manufactures and markets industrial grade computer systems and components that are based on industry standard computer architectures. The Company markets its products to manufacturers of automated equipment used for telecommunications, industrial and military applications.      

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary in Germany (“OSS GmbH”).  During July 2016, the Company acquired Mission Technologies Group, Inc. (“Magma”) and its operations (Note 3).

In April 2017, the Company and a related entity formed a joint venture named SkyScale, LLC in the State of California (“SkyScale”).  In accordance with the Contribution Agreement, each member contributed $750,000 and received a 50% interest in the joint venture.  The purpose of SkyScale is to engage in the business of providing high performance computing capabilities as cloud services.

In May 2017, the Company entered into a Technology and Software License Agreement with Western Digital (“WDT”) for their Ion flash storage software.  The agreement provides the Company with the Ion source code and rights to develop and market derivative products.  The Company intends to develop and sell Ion flash storage software with its high-density storage arrays, as well as service existing WDT software users (Note 3).

Also, in July 2017, the Company entered in to a Service Agreement with WDT to service its existing customer base that utilizes Ion flash storage software.  The Company also purchased certain equipment from WDT and hired selected employees to assist in the servicing of these existing customers.  Management has determined that the activities and assets acquired from WDT comprise a business as defined in ASC 805-10-55-4 through 55.  Consideration paid by the Company to WDT pursuant to the arrangements described above was $67,000.  In addition, the Company is required to pay prospective royalties to WDT of $2,500 or $5,000 for each sale of the Company’s products that include licensed software.  WDT is obligated to pay the Company for services rendered to support existing WDT software users the amount of $1,400,000 in defined declining quarterly amounts over a three year period.  Management does not believe this business acquisition meets the significance definition provided in Regulation S-X, Rule 210.1-02(w).

On August 31, 2018, the Company acquired Concept Development Inc. (CDI) located in Irvine, California for cash of $646,759, and common stock of $4,194,673 (Note 3).  CDI specializes in the design and manufacture of custom high-performance computing systems for airborne in-flight entertainment systems.

 

On October 31, 2018, the Company’s wholly-owned German subsidiary, OSS GmbH, acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Bressner Technology GmbH, a Germany limited liability company located near Munich, Germany, from its principal owners for cash consideration of €4,725,000 (US$5,374,582) and stock consideration of 106,463 newly-issued restricted shares of the Company’s common stock.

On December 31, 2018, as a result of changes in the competitive landscape and downward pressure on pricing from large competitors, the members to the SkyScale joint venture agreement agreed to dissolve SkyScale.  As a result, it became necessary for OSS to write-off the outstanding balances of accounts and notes receivable and interest in the amount of $648,411, which write-off was offset by receipt of equipment valued at $160,000 and allocation of income from disposition of assets and liabilities of $71,502.  These amounts have been included as an administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  Additional reserves for future

F-10


 

expenses to be incurred in the process of closing SkyScale were recorded in the amount of $288,400 and are included in administrative expenses.  As a result of the above, total charges related to the dissolution of SkyScale were $705,309 during the year ended December 31, 2018.  

 

 

Going Concern Considerations

 

On February 1, 2018, the Company completed its initial public offering through the initial sale of 3,800,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $5.00 per share (see Note 8).  Proceeds from the sale were used to retire outstanding debt obligations, complete complimentary business acquisitions, and provide the Company with requisite working capital.

 

The combination of continued revenue growth, coupled with an expected improvement in gross margins, cost containment of expenses and funding received from our initial public offering leads management to believe that it is probable that our liquidity will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for current operations through at least a period of the next twelve months. If necessary, external sources of debt and/or equity financing may be obtained based on management’s history of being able to raise capital.  As of February 28, 2019, the Company has received funding commitments in the amount of $4.0 million from members of the Board of Directors until such time as the Company secures a line of credit from a financial institution.

As a result of both management’s plans and current favorable business trends, management believes that the Company has sufficient liquidity to satisfy its anticipated cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. However, there can be no assurance that our operations will become profitable or that external sources of financing, including the issuance of debt and/or equity securities, will be available at times and on terms acceptable to us, or at all.  The Company’s management prepares budgets and monitors the financial results of the Company as a tool to align liquidity needs to the recurring business requirements.     

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis of accounting in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”), as set forth in the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”).  Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation particularly with the presentation of common stock which is now presented with a par value of $0.0001 per share, in accordance with our reincorporation as a Delaware corporation.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OSS, which include the results from the Magma acquisition, Ion business combination, and acquisition of Concept Development Inc., since their respective dates of acquisition, its wholly-owned subsidiary, OSS GmbH, which includes the acquisition of Bressner Technology GmbH on October 31, 2018 and the accounts of the joint venture, SkyScale LLC (collectively referred to as the “Company”).  Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

On April 6, 2017, the Company and Jacoma Investments, LLC, an entity owned by our board member Jack Harrison, formed a joint venture, SkyScale, LLC (“SkyScale”), to engage in the business of providing high performance computing capabilities as cloud services.  In accordance with the terms of the contribution agreement, Jacoma Investments, LLC agreed to contribute $750,000 in capital and the Company agreed to contribute $750,000 in the form of credits to purchase equipment, personnel or support services from the Company.  Each party received a 50% membership interest in the joint venture.  Management determined that SkyScale is a variable interest entity primarily because it is thinly capitalized and may require additional capital to finance its activities.  

Management determined that the Company is the primary beneficiary of SkyScale based primarily on the related party nature of SkyScale’s decision-makers and daily business operators.  In May 2018, the Company loaned SkyScale $300,000 for operations at an interest rate of 12%, per annum.  On August 30, 2018, an additional one-year working capital loan of $300,000 was authorized on similar terms of which SkyScale utilized $150,000.  

F-11


 

On December 31, 2018, as a result of changes in the competitive landscape and downward pressure on pricing from large competitors, the members to the SkyScale joint venture agreement agreed to dissolve SkyScale.  As a result, it became necessary for the Company to write-off the outstanding balances due from SkyScale of notes receivable and interest in the amount of $478,599.  The Company also had unpaid invoices for services rendered to SkyScale in the amount of $169,812.  These amounts have been charged to administrative expenses and are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as an operating expense.  As partial consideration for unpaid balances, SkyScale transferred computer equipment to the Company at an estimated market value of $160,000, which is held-for-sale and included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.  The Company also received allocated income from disposition of SkyScale assets and liabilities of $71,502.  Additionally, reserve for future expenses to be incurred in the process of closing SkyScale were recorded in the amount of $288,400.   As a result of the above, total charges related to the dissolution of SkyScale were $705,309 during the year ended December 31, 2018.  

The assets and liabilities of SkyScale are as follows:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

47,663

 

 

$

180,269

 

Receivables

 

 

-

 

 

 

24,522

 

Other assets

 

 

-

 

 

 

8,500

 

Fixed assets

 

 

-

 

 

 

590,452

 

Total assets

 

$

47,663

 

 

$

803,743

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

46,663

 

 

$

82,993

 

Accrued expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,875

 

Notes payable

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

 

 

46,663

 

 

 

93,868

 

Members' equity

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

709,875

 

Total liabilities and members' equity

 

$

47,663

 

 

$

803,743

 

 

Operating results for SkyScale are as follows:

 

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net revenue

 

$

158,514

 

 

$

30,887

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

(675,058

)

 

 

-

 

Gross margin

 

 

(516,544

)

 

 

30,887

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative

 

 

358,725

 

 

 

580,064

 

Marketing and selling

 

 

132,004

 

 

 

77,139

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

490,729

 

 

 

657,203

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(1,007,273

)

 

 

(626,316

)

Other (expense) income

 

 

134,590

 

 

 

-

 

Net loss

 

$

(872,683

)

 

$

(626,316

)

 

The non-controlling interest attributable to SkyScale is shown as a component of equity on the consolidated balance sheets and the share of the loss attributable to the non-controlling interest is shown as a component of income (loss) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  Management determined that the dissolution of SkyScale did not represent a strategic shift that has a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results.  Accordingly, it has not been reported as discontinued operations.

F-12


 

NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosures of contingent assets, liabilities, and expenses at the date of the consolidated financial statements during the reporting period.  

Significant estimates made by management include, among others, the fair value of acquired net assets of Ion in July 2017, CDI in August 2018, and Bressner Technology GmbH in October 2018, dissolution expenses for SkyScale, the allowance for doubtful accounts, fair value of stock options and warrants, recoverability of inventories and long-lived assets, and realizability of deferred tax assets.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Concentration Risks

At times, deposits held with financial institutions may exceed the amount of insurance provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), which provides basic deposit coverage with limits up to $250,000 per owner.  As of December 31, 2018, the Company had $989,508 in excess of the insurance limits.  The Company has not experienced any such losses in these accounts.  In German, the deposit insurance is €100,000 per bank, per customer.  Bressner has funds on deposit in both Euro and U.S. dollar denominations of €548,962 (US$628,221), with banks in excess of the insurance limits.

In the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, two customers, disguise (formerly d3) and Raytheon, accounted for approximately 60%, and 46% of the net sales of OSS, excluding the revenue from the recent acquisitions of CDI and Bressner, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, three customers accounted for 74% of net trade accounts receivable and, as of December 31, 2017, three customers accounted for 68% of net trade accounts receivables, excluding recent acquisitions. The revenue for CDI comes predominately from two customers and represents 67% of revenue for the four month period ended December 31, 2018.  Bressner received approximately 47% of its revenue for two customers for the two month period ended December 31, 2018.

Excluding the recent acquisitions of CDI and Bressner, the Company made purchases from three suppliers which represented approximately 45% and 48% of purchases for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  CDI made purchases from three suppliers which represented approximately 44% for the four month period ended December 31, 2018.  Bressner Technology GmbH made purchases from three suppliers which represented 36% for the two month period ended December 31, 2018.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit and money market accounts.  The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments with an initial maturity of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents.  Management believes that the carrying amounts of cash equivalents approximate their fair value because of the short maturity period.

 

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are presented at net realizable value.  This value includes an appropriate allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts to reflect any loss anticipated on the trade accounts receivable and unbilled receivables.   Unbilled receivables include cost and gross profit earned in excess of billings.  The allowance for doubtful accounts is an estimate to cover the losses resulting from the inability of customers to make payments on their outstanding balances and unbilled receivables.  In estimating the required allowance, management considers the overall quality and aging of the accounts receivable, specific customer circumstances, current economic trends, and historical experience with collections.  At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the allowance for doubtful accounts is $13,403 and $2,101, respectively.

 

F-13


 

Revenues earned in excess of related billings are recorded as an asset on the balance sheet as unbilled receivables.  Unbilled receivables as of December 31, 2018, were $65,157.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value determined on a first-in, first-out basis.  The Company uses the average cost method for purposes of determining cost, which approximates the first-in, first-out method.

The Company establishes reserves on its inventories to write-down the carrying value of its estimated obsolete or excess inventories to estimated net realizable value based upon observations of historical usage and assumptions about future demand and market conditions.  In addition, the Company considers changes in the market value of components in determining the net realizable value of its inventory.  Inventory reserves are not typically reversed until the specific inventories are sold or otherwise disposed.

 

We value our inventory at the lower of cost or its estimated net realizable value on a first-in, first-out basis.  We use the average cost method for purposes of determining cost, which approximates the first-in, first-out method. We write down inventory for excess and obsolescence based upon a review of historical usage and assumptions about future demand, product mix and possible alternative uses. Actual demand, product mix and alternative usage may be lower than those that we project and this difference could have a material adverse effect on our gross margin if inventory write-downs beyond those initially recorded become necessary.  Alternatively, if actual demand, product mix and alternative usage are more favorable than those we estimated at the time of such a write-down, our gross margin could be favorably impacted in future periods.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment, other than leasehold improvements, are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful life of the related asset.  Tooling and test equipment includes capitalized labor costs associated with the development of the related tooling and test equipment.  Costs incurred for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred, and expenditures for major replacements and improvements are capitalized. Upon retirement or sale, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization of disposed assets are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in other expense, net.

 

Goodwill

 

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets acquired in business combinations. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at least annually or when we deem that a triggering event has occurred.  The Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually on December 31 st .  The Company completed its annual assessment for goodwill impairment and determined that goodwill is not impaired as of December 31, 2018 and no adjustment was required.   For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized goodwill related to two business acquisitions as described in Note 3.  

 

Intangible Assets and Long-lived Assets

 

We evaluate our intangible and long-lived assets for impairment annually when events or circumstances arise that indicate our intangible and long-lived assets may be impaired. Indicators of impairment include, but are not limited to, a significant deterioration in overall economic conditions, a decline in our market capitalization, the loss of significant business, significant decreases in funding for our contracts, or other significant adverse changes in industry or market conditions. The Company completed its qualitative assessment for impairment in December 2018 and determined that there was no impairment as of December 31, 2018. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products will continue, which could result in an impairment of intangible and long-lived assets in the future.

F-14


 

 

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605.  Accordingly, revenue from the sale of products is recognized when there is evidence of an arrangement, the selling price is fixed or determinable, title and risk of loss has transferred to the customer, any installation or service obligations have been satisfied, and collection is reasonably assured. Net revenue includes deductions for customer discounts and actual and estimated returns. All amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling are classified as net sales.

Customer agreements include one vendor managed inventory program.  Pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13.A.3.a , the Company recognizes revenue under this arrangement when (i) risks of ownership have passed to the customer; (ii)  the customer's  commitment to purchase the goods is fixed ; (iii) there is a fixed schedule for delivery of the goods that is reasonable and consistent with the customer ' s  business purpose ; (iv) the Company  does not have any specific performance obligations such that the earning process  is not complete;  (v) the ordered goods have been segregated  from the Company ' s inventory and are not subject to being used to fill other orders; and (vi) the product  is complete  and ready  for  shipment.  Also , such arrangement must be requested by the customer and the customer has explained a substantial business purpose for the arrangement.  Management also considers whether the customer ' s custodial risks are insured and whether modifications to the Company ' s normal billing and credit terms were required.

The Company recorded revenue from product sales that are held in vendor managed inventory under these agreements of $9,960,469 and $10,149,186, for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, $1,662,293 and $996,588, respectively, of products sold through those dates were held by the Company in the vendor management program.

 

Revenues on certain fixed-price contracts where we provide engineering services, prototypes and completed products are recognized over the contract term based on the percentage of completion or based upon milestones delivered that are provided during the period and compared to the total estimated development and milestone goals to be provided over the entire contract. These services require that we perform significant, extensive and complex design, development, modification or implementation of our customers’ systems. Performance will often extend over long periods of time, and our right to receive future payment depends on our future performance in accordance with the agreement.  Recognized revenue using the percentage of completion accounting method during the year ended December 31, 2018 was $152,390.

 

The percentage-of-completion methodology involves recognizing probable and reasonably estimable revenue using the percentage of services completed, on a current cumulative cost to estimate total cost basis, using a reasonably consistent profit margin over the period. Due to the long-term nature of these projects, developing the estimates of costs often requires significant judgment. Factors that must be considered in estimating the progress of work completed and ultimate cost of the projects include, but are not limited to, the availability of labor and labor productivity, the nature and complexity of the work to be performed and the impact of delayed performance. If changes occur in delivery, productivity or other factors used in developing the estimates of costs or revenues, we revise our cost and revenue estimates, which may result in increases or decreases in revenues and costs, and such revisions are reflected in earnings in the period in which the revision becomes known.

 

Related billings that are in excess of revenue earned are deferred and recorded as a liability on the balance sheet until the related services are provided.  Deferred revenue as of December 31, 2018 was $51,602.  The Company recognizes revenues for non-refundable, upfront implementation fees on a straight-line basis over the period beginning with initiation of ongoing services through the end of the contract term.

Warranty Reserve

The Company offers product warranties that generally extend for one year from the date of sale. Such warranties require the Company to repair or replace defective product returned to the Company during the warranty period at no cost to the customer. The Company records an estimate for warranty‑related costs at the time of sale based on its historical and estimated future product return rates and expected repair or replacement costs (Note 7).  

F-15


 

While such costs have historically been within management’s expectations and the provisions established, unexpected changes in failure rates could have a material adverse impact on the Company, requiring additional warranty reserves and could adversely affect the Company’s gross profit and gross margins.

Shipping and Handling Costs

The Company's shipping and handling costs are included in cost of goods sold for all periods presented.

Foreign Currency

 

We operate primarily in the United States.  Foreign sales of products and services are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars.  We also conduct limited business outside the United States through our foreign subsidiary in Germany, where business is largely transacted in non-U.S. dollar currencies particularly the Euro, which is subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.   Accordingly, we are subject to exposure from changes in the exchange rates of local currencies. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recorded in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations .

 

OSS GmbH operates as an extension of OSS’s domestic operations.  The functional currency of OSS GmbH is the Euro. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are remeasured to the functional currency at the average exchange rate in effect during the period.  At the end of each reporting period, monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured at historical exchange rates. Consequently, changes in the exchange rates of the currencies may impact the translation of the foreign subsidiaries’ statements of operations into U.S. dollars, which may in turn affect our consolidated statement of operations. The resulting foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated balance sheet.

 

Derivative Financial Instruments

 

We employ derivatives to manage certain market risks through the use of foreign exchange forward contracts. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Our derivatives are designated as a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash flow hedge). We hedge a portion of the exchange risk involved in anticipation of highly probable foreign currency-denominated transactions. In anticipation of these transactions, we enter into foreign exchange contracts to provide currency at a fixed rate. As of December 31, 2018, Bressner had no foreign exchange contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2018.  

 

Unrealized gains on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value as assets, and unrealized losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value as liabilities. For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion is reported as a component of accumulated OCI until reclassified into interest expense in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings. The gain or loss on the ineffective portion is recognized as “Other income (expense) – net” in the consolidated statements of income in each period.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for employee and director share-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation” .  Under ASC 718, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity grant).

All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments to non-employees are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the estimated fair

F-16


 

value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the third-party performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

Employee and director stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of stock-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period.  Given that stock-based compensation expense recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. The Company’s estimated average forfeiture rates are based on historical forfeiture experience and estimated future forfeitures.

 

Compensation cost for stock awards, which include restricted stock units (“RSUs”), is measured at the fair value on the grant date and recognized as expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the related service period. The fair value of stock awards is based on the quoted price of our common stock on the grant date.

The estimated fair value of common stock option awards is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model requires subjective assumptions regarding future stock price volatility and expected time to exercise, along with assumptions about the risk-free interest rate and expected dividends, all of which affect the estimated fair values of the Company’s common stock option awards.  Given a lack of historical stock option exercises, the expected term of options granted is calculated as the average of the weighted vesting period and the contractual expiration date of the option.  

This calculation is based on a method permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission in instances where the vesting and exercise terms of options granted meet certain conditions and where limited historical exercise data is available.  The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the common stock of comparable public companies that operate in similar industries as the Company.

The risk-free rate selected to value any particular grant is based on the U.S. Treasury rate that corresponds to the expected term of the grant effective as of the date of the grant. The expected dividend assumption is based on the Company’s history and management’s expectation regarding dividend payouts. Compensation expense for common stock option awards with graded vesting schedules is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the last separately vesting portion of the award, provided that the accumulated cost recognized as of any date at least equals the value of the vested portion of the award.

If there are any modifications or cancellations of the underlying vested or unvested stock-based awards, the Company may be required to accelerate, increase or cancel any remaining unearned stock-based compensation expense, or record additional expense for vested stock-based awards. Future stock-based compensation expense and unearned stock- based compensation may increase to the extent that the Company grants additional common stock options or other stock-based awards.

Business Combinations

 

We utilize the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations and allocate the purchase price of an acquisition to the various tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. We primarily establish fair value using the income approach based upon a discounted cash flow model. The income approach requires the use of many assumptions and estimates including future revenues and expenses, as well as discount factors and income tax rates. Other estimates include:

 

 

Estimated step-ups or write-downs for fixed assets and inventory;

 

Estimated fair values of intangible assets; and

 

Estimated income tax assets and liabilities assumed from the target

F-17


 

While we use our best estimates and assumptions as part of the purchase price allocation process to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the business acquisition date, our estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the purchase price allocation period, which is generally one year from the business acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill.

For changes in the valuation of intangible assets between preliminary and final purchase price allocation, the related amortization is adjusted in the period it occurs. Subsequent to the purchase price allocation period any adjustment to assets acquired or liabilities assumed is included in operating results in the period in which the adjustment is determined.  Should we issue shares of our common stock in an acquisition, we will be required to estimate the fair value of the shares issued.

 

Debt Discounts

Debt discounts, which originated from the relative fair value of the warrants issued in connection with note payable and related-party notes payable during 2016 and 2015 (Note 8), are recorded against note payable and related-party notes payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.   Amortization of the debt discounts are calculated using the straight-line method over the term of the notes which approximates the effective interest method and are recorded in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. All notes with warrants were retired in February 2018, and the remaining debt discount balance of $24,830 was recognized as interest expense in February 2018.  

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and included in marketing and selling expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  Advertising costs for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $100,520 and $74,293, respectively.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenditures are expensed in the period incurred.  Research and development expenses primarily consist of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation, as well as consulting expenses and allocated facilities and other overhead costs. Research and development activities include the development of new technologies, features and functionality in support of the Company’s products and customer needs.

Income Taxes

The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the consolidated financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.

Under ASC Topic 740, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority.  An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained.  Additionally, ASC Topic 740 provides requirements for derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.  The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.  

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, California and Germany and has open tax statutes for U.S. federal taxes for the years ended December 31, 2015 through 2017.  For California, the open tax statutes are for years December 31, 2014 through 2017 and for Germany the open years include December 31, 2016 and 2017.

F-18


 

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”).  The Tax Act reduces the corporate tax rate to 21%, effective January 1, 2018.  Consequently, the Company has recorded a decrease related to deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as of December 31, 2017.   Except for this adjustment, the Company does not foresee material changes to its gross liability of uncertain tax positions within the next twelve months (Note 13).

Interest Expense

Interest expense consists primarily of interest associated with the Company’s issued debt including the amortization of debt discounts.  The Company recognizes the amortization of debt discounts and the amortization of interest costs using a straight-line method which approximates the effective interest method.

Net (Loss) Income Per Share

Basic net (loss) income per share is calculated by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted net (loss) income per share is calculated by dividing the net (loss) income by the weighted-average shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential shares consist of dilutive shares issuable and the exercise or vesting of outstanding stock options and warrants, respectively, computed using the treasury stock method. During a period where a net loss is incurred, dilutive potential shares are excluded from the computation of dilutive net loss per share, as inclusion is anti-dilutive.  

On February 1, 2018, in connection with the Company’s initial public offering, the Company’s outstanding Series A, Series B, and Series C, Preferred Stock was automatically converted to common stock, par value $0.0001.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance which provides a single, comprehensive accounting model for revenue arising from contracts with customers. This guidance supersedes most of the existing revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. Under this model, revenue is recognized at an amount that a company expects to be entitled to upon transferring control of goods or services to a customer, as opposed to when risks and rewards transfer to a customer. The new guidance also requires additional disclosures about the nature, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flow arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. Considering the one-year delay in the required adoption date for the guidance as issued in July 2015, the new guidance is effective for us beginning in 2018 and may be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented or through a cumulative adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance in the year of adoption. We will adopt this standard beginning January 1, 2019 and expect to use the modified retrospective method of adoption. Under the new guidance, based on the nature of our contracts, we expect to continue to recognize revenue in a similar manner as with the current guidance. Additionally, we expect the unit of accounting, that is, the identification of performance obligations, will be consistent with current revenue guidance. Accordingly, the adoption of this standard is not expected to significantly impact our revenues.  

 

The new standard is not expected to have a significant impact to revenue recognition for product deliveries for which we have historically recognized revenue as the related products were shipped. Under the new standard we will recognize revenue for these contracts at a point in time when the products transfer to the customer which is customarily upon shipment.

 

The new standard is not expected to have a significant impact to revenue recognition for our customer-funded research and development contracts that we have historically recognized revenue based on completion of specified milestones. Under the new standard we will continue to recognize revenue for these contracts based upon completion and acceptance of the specified milestone.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”).  Under ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease,

F-19


 

measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term.  ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early application is permitted.  Lessees must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements.  The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented.  Lessees may not apply a full retrospective transition approach.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures, but preliminary expects its assets and liabilities to increase significantly.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which is intended to reduce the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted, provided that all of the amendments are adopted in the same period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-15 on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”). The amendments in this update clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 will be effective for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2019 and interim reporting periods within that year. Early adoption is permitted for transactions that have not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Stock-based Compensation: Improvements to Nonemployee Share-based Payment Accounting , which amends the existing accounting standards for share-based payments to nonemployees. This ASU aligns much of the guidance on measuring and classifying nonemployee awards with that of awards to employees. Under the new guidance, the measurement of nonemployee equity awards is fixed on the grant date. This ASU becomes effective in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 and early adoption is permitted but no earlier than an entity’s adoption date of Topic 606. Entities will apply the ASU by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the annual period of adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2018-07 will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Recently implemented accounting pronouncements

 

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU 2017-04 simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment testing. An entity will no longer determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Instead, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary.  The Company adopted early ASU 2017-04 in 2018, as permitted for interim and annual impairment testing after January 1, 2017.  The Company’s early adoption of this guideline did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting (“ASU 2017-09”), which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in ASC Topic 718. Under the new guidance, modification accounting is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions, or the classification of the award (as equity or liability) changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions. ASU 2017-09 will be effective for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2017 and interim

F-20


 

reporting periods within that year. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopt ion of this guideline did not have a material effect on the Company’s con solidated financial statements.

 

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330) ("ASU 2015-11"). The amendments in ASU 2015-11 require that an entity measure inventory within the scope of the standard at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transaction. The amendments in this update more closely align the measurement of inventory in U.S. GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017.  The Company adopted ASU No. 2015-11 in the first quarter of 2018, without a material impact to its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) (“ASU 2016-09”), which simplified certain aspects of the accounting for stock-based payment transactions, including income taxes, classification of awards and classification in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-09 in the first quarter of 2018, with no impact to its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

 

NOTE 3 – ACQUISITIONS

 

Magma

On July 15, 2016, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of Mission Technology Group, Inc. (“Magma”) from Magma’s former stockholder (“Magma Stockholder”). Magma designs, manufactures, and markets industrial grade computer systems and components and is also located in Southern California. The acquisition is expected to increase the Company’s brand awareness and market share. The Company issued 1,263,749 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Magma Stockholder for 100% of Magma shares. The fair value assigned to the shares of common stock was $1,756,611.

Management estimated the fair value of the consideration issued to the Magma Stockholder and considered factors including recent third-party valuation reports of the Company’s common stock and estimates of discounts for lack of marketability related to the Company’s common stock to the extent not considered in the third-party valuation report.

The transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method pursuant to ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, goodwill has been measured as the excess of the total consideration over the amounts assigned to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill was attributed to management’s assessment of projected increases in overall revenues derived from greater brand awareness and certain economies of scale. The acquisition combines the expertise of OSS in the computer hardware industry with Magma's customer base.

 

Fair valuation methods used for the identifiable net assets acquired in the acquisition make use of quoted prices in active markets, discounted cash flows for assessing the value of the customer lists and relationships  and the relief from royalty method for determination of drawing and technology values, both using a risk adjusted weighted cost of capital.  Management estimates that any residual value from the intangible assets will not be significant.  The weighted-average amortization period of each intangible asset identified is three years.

On the acquisition date, goodwill of $1,547,358 and other intangible assets of $1,186,683 were recorded. The business combination is considered a tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) under the Internal Revenue Code; therefore, acquired goodwill and intangibles of $2,734,041 is not tax-deductible. However, Magma had tax-deductible goodwill of $496,275 (with an original basis of $1,294,624) that will continue to be amortized for tax purposes after the acquisition. In accordance with Topic 350, Intangibles––Goodwill and Other, the Company completed its annual impairment test and determined that the goodwill was not impaired at December 31, 2018.

 

F-21


 

The definite lived intangible assets related to the Magma acquisition consisted of the following as of December 31, 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Definite lived intangible assets:

 

Expected

Life

 

Remaining

Life

 

Gross

Intangible

Assets

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net

Intangible

Assets

 

Drawings and technology

 

3 years

 

.5 years

 

$

760,207

 

 

$

(622,949

)

 

$

137,258

 

Customer lists and relationships

 

3 years

 

.5 years

 

 

398,717

 

 

 

(326,725

)

 

 

71,992

 

Trademarks,  URLs and other

 

3 years

 

.5 years

 

 

27,759

 

 

 

(23,245

)

 

 

4,514

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,186,683

 

 

$

(972,919

)

 

$

213,764

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The definite lived intangible assets consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Definite lived intangible assets:

 

Expected

Life

 

Remaining

Life

 

Gross

Intangible

Assets

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net

Intangible

Assets

 

Drawings and technology

 

3 years

 

1.5 years

 

$

760,207

 

 

$

(369,545

)

 

$

390,662

 

Customer lists and relationships

 

3 years

 

1.5 years

 

 

398,717

 

 

 

(193,821

)

 

 

204,896

 

Trademarks,  URLs and other

 

3 years

 

1.5 years

 

 

27,759

 

 

 

(14,912

)

 

 

12,847

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,186,683

 

 

$

(578,278

)

 

$

608,405

 

 

Amortization expense recognized during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $394,641 and $395,642, respectively.  The future amortization expense of the definite lived intangible assets is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

213,764

 

 

 

213,764

 

 

Ion Software and Services

On May 9, 2017, the Company entered into a Technology and Software Source Code License Agreement with Western Digital (WDT) for its Ion flash storage software.  The agreement provides the Company with the Ion source code and rights to develop and market derivative products with the intended purpose of developing and selling Ion flash storage software with the Company’s high-density storage arrays.  Concurrent with this agreement, the Company purchased certain equipment from Western Digital, has the right to hire selected employees and to forgo certain royalty payments on purchases of solid state drives for a designated customer.  The Company took receipt of the licensed software and equipment in July 2017 and made payment in September 2017.  

Subsequently, on July 1, 2017, the Company entered in to a Service Agreement with WDT to service their existing customer base that utilizes Ion flash storage software.  The Services Agreement grants the rights and obligations to OSS to provide Ion software level 1-4 support services (as defined in the agreement) to existing WDT software users for a three year period based upon fixed quarterly payments.

The Ion transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method pursuant to ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the excess of the total fair value of identifiable assets value over the consideration paid was recognized as a bargain purchase and the resulting gain is being deferred and recognized over a thirty-six month period pro-rata with the time period and the rendering of WDT customer support services.  Deferred revenue recognized for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $90,632 and $57,675, respectively and is included in revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  The Company incurred $65,805 in shipping and storage fees related to the acquisition of this equipment.  These costs which have been included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.

F-22


 

The determination of fair value for the identifiable net assets acquired in the acquisition was determined by management and considered the results of a third-party appraisal of the fair value of equipment purchased. Prior to July 1, 2017, there were no operations or activities associated with this acquisition.

The allocation of the total consideration to the acquired net assets as of the acquisition date for Ion is as follows:

 

Equipment at estimated fair value

 

$

297,700

 

Amount paid

 

 

(67,000

)

Gain on acquisition of equipment to be recognized over the three year contract

   service period

 

$

230,700

 

 

Concept Development Inc.

On August 31, 2018, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of Concept Development Inc. (“CDI”) from CDI’s former stockholder (“CDI Stockholder”) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the “Merger Agreement”).  CDI specializes in the design and manufacturing of custom high-performance computing systems for airborne in-flight entertainment systems.  CDI is located in Southern California. The acquisition is expected to increase the Company’s access to the in-flight entertainment market and gain technical expertise in the design and manufacturing of airborne equipment.  

The Company paid cash of $646,759 and issued 1,266,364 shares of the Company’s common stock to the CDI Stockholder for 100% of CDI outstanding common stock. The fair value assigned to the shares of common stock was $4,194,673, which was based upon the closing price of OSS’s stock on August 31, 2018 of $3.63 less a discount of 8.75% for lack of marketability for a one year period.

This transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method pursuant to ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations . Accordingly, goodwill has been measured as the excess of the total consideration over the amounts assigned to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

The preliminary allocation of the total consideration to the acquired net assets as of the acquisition date for CDI is as follows:

 

Cash

$

139,634

 

Accounts receivable

 

489,267

 

Prepaid expenses

 

45,683

 

Inventories

 

205,635

 

Property and equipment

 

45,026

 

Deposits and other

 

12,526

 

Customer lists and relationships

 

1,470,000

 

Trade name

 

100,000

 

Non-compete

 

200,000

 

Accounts payable

 

(91,997

)

Accrued expenses

 

(99,711

)

Deferred revenue

 

(95,610

)

Deferred income taxes

 

(258,301

)

Other accrued liabilities

 

(50,985

)

Working capital loan

 

(370,096

)

Total fair value excluding goodwill

 

1,741,071

 

Goodwill

 

3,100,361

 

Total consideration

$

4,841,432

 

 

F-23


 

The determination of fair value for the identifiable net assets acquired in the acquisition was determined by management and considered the results of a third-party appraisal of the fair value of equipment purchased. Management estimates that any residual value from the intangible assets listed above will not be significant. On the acquisition date, goodwill of $3,100,361 and other intangible assets of $1,770,000 were recorded. The business combination is considered a tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) under the Internal Revenue Code.

 

As of the date of this report, management is still in the process of determining the final accounting related to the CDI transaction.  Because management’s analysis has not yet been completed, the Company’s determination of the purchase price and the resulting purchase price allocation is preliminary.

 

The Company incurred $245,028 in accounting and legal fees related to the acquisition of CDI.  The amount attributable to the Company has been included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operation for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

The amount of revenue and net loss of CDI included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $755,259 and $(316,390), respectively.  The following unaudited consolidated pro forma information presents the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 as if the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2017.

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

2018 (unaudited)

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

2017 (unaudited)

 

Revenue

$

39,589,527

 

 

$

31,418,213

 

Net (loss) income

$

(994,325

)

 

$

596,637

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition-related pro forma net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders

 

Basic

$

(0.08

)

 

$

0.09

 

Diluted

$

(0.08

)

 

$

0.05

 

 

 

Definite lived intangible assets related to the CDI acquisition are as follows as of December 31, 2018:

 

 

 

Expected Life

 

Remaining

Months

 

Gross

Intangible

Assets

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

 

 

Net

Intangible

Assets

 

Customer lists and

   relationships

 

60 months

 

56 months

 

$

1,470,000

 

 

$

(98,000

)

 

 

 

$

1,372,000

 

Trade name

 

24 months

 

20 months

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

(16,667

)

 

 

 

 

83,333

 

Non-compete

 

36 months

 

32 months

 

 

200,000

 

 

 

(22,222

)

 

 

 

 

177,778

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,770,000

 

 

$

(136,889

)

 

 

 

$

1,633,111

 

 

The amortization expense of the definite lived intangible assets for the years remaining is as follows:

 

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

Total

 

$

410,667

 

 

$

394,000

 

 

$

338,444

 

 

$

294,000

 

 

$

196,000

 

 

$

1,633,111

 

 

Amortization expense recognized during the year ended December 31, 2018 was $136,889.

 

Bressner Technology GmbH

On October 31, 2018, the Company’s wholly-owned German subsidiary, OSS GmbH, acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Bressner Technology GmbH, a Germany limited liability company located near Munich, Germany, from its principal owners for cash consideration of €4,725,000 (US$5,374,582) and stock consideration of 106,463 newly-issued restricted shares of the Company’s common stock. The fair value assigned to the shares of common stock was $228,779, which was based upon the closing price of OSS’s stock on October 31, 2018 of $2.47 less a discount of 13.0% for lack of marketability for a two year period.

 

F-24


 

This transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method pursuant to ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations . Accordingly, goodwill has been measured as the excess of the total consideration over the amounts assigned to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

The preliminary allocation of the total consideration to the acquired net assets as of the acquisition date for Bressner Technology GmbH is as follows:

 

Cash

$

560,932

 

Accounts receivable

 

2,238,881

 

Inventory

 

3,721,685

 

Prepaid expenses and deposits

 

124,491

 

Fixed assets

 

346,637

 

Customer relationships

 

1,215,798

 

Trade name

 

329,515

 

Non-compete - Josef Bressner

 

231,797

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

(2,076,450

)

Notes payable

 

(2,536,148

)

Deferred tax liability

 

(43,499

)

Total fair value excluding goodwill

 

4,113,639

 

Goodwill

 

1,489,722

 

 Total allocated purchase price

$

5,603,361

 

 

The determination of fair value for the identifiable net assets acquired in the acquisition was determined by management and considered the results of a third-party appraisal of the fair value of equipment purchased. Management estimates that any residual value from the intangible assets listed above will not be significant. On the acquisition date, goodwill of $1,489,722 and other intangible assets of $1,777,110 were recorded. The business combination is considered a tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) under the Internal Revenue Code.

 

As of the date of this report, management is still in the process of determining the final accounting related to the Bressner transaction.  Because management’s analysis has not yet been completed, the Company’s determination of the purchase price and the resulting purchase price allocation is preliminary.

 

The Company incurred $419,305 in accounting and legal fees related to the acquisition of Bressner.  The amount attributable to the Company has been included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operation for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

The amount of revenue and net income of Bressner included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $3,849,625 and $153,614, respectively.  The following unaudited consolidated pro forma information presents the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 as if the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2017.

 

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

2018 (unaudited)

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

2017 (unaudited)

 

Revenue

 

$

51,071,348

 

 

$

44,270,437

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(597,018

)

 

$

586,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition-related pro forma net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders

 

Basic

 

$

(0.05

)

 

$

0.11

 

Diluted

 

$

(0.05

)

 

$

0.05

 

 

 

F-25


 

 

Definite lived intangible assets related to the Bressner acquisition are as follows as of December 31, 2018:

 

 

 

Expected Life

 

Remaining

Life

 

Gross

Intangible

Assets

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

 

 

Net

Intangible

Assets

 

Customer lists and

   relationships

 

36 months

 

34 months

 

$

1,215,798

 

 

$

(67,544

)

 

 

 

$

1,148,254

 

Trade name

 

36 months

 

34 months

 

 

329,515

 

 

 

(18,306

)

 

 

 

 

311,209

 

Non-compete

 

36 months

 

34 months

 

 

231,797

 

 

 

(12,878

)

 

 

 

 

218,919

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,777,110

 

 

$

(98,728

)

 

 

 

$

1,678,382

 

 

The amortization expense of the definite lived intangible assets for the years remaining is as follows:

 

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

Total

 

$

592,370

 

 

$

592,370

 

 

$

493,642

 

 

$

1,678,382

 

 

Amortization expense recognized during the year ended December 31, 2018 was $98,728.

 

NOTE 4 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable, net consists of the following at December 31,  

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Accounts receivable

 

$

10,488,396

 

 

$

5,194,831

 

Unbilled receivables

 

 

65,157

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

10,553,553

 

 

 

5,194,831

 

Less:  allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

(13,403

)

 

 

(2,101

)

 

 

$

10,540,150

 

 

$

5,192,730

 

 

NOTE 5 – INVENTORIES

Inventories, net consist of the following at December 31:

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Raw materials

 

$

2,248,520

 

 

$

2,079,589

 

Sub-assemblies

 

 

1,198,071

 

 

 

2,417,095

 

Work-in-process

 

 

311,072

 

 

 

-

 

Finished goods

 

 

3,466,419

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

7,224,082

 

 

 

4,496,684

 

Less:  reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventories

 

 

(400,152

)

 

 

(800,354

)

 

 

$

6,823,930

 

 

$

3,696,330

 

 

F-26


 

NOTE 6 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment, net consists of the following at December 31:

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Computers and computer equipment

 

$

609,921

 

 

$

936,317

 

Furniture and office equipment

 

 

211,759

 

 

 

161,434

 

Manufacturing equipment and engineering tools

 

 

2,211,080

 

 

 

2,041,238

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

163,373

 

 

 

131,188

 

 

 

 

3,196,133

 

 

 

3,270,177

 

Less:  accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(1,880,167

)

 

 

(1,688,363

)

 

 

 

1,315,966

 

 

 

1,581,814

 

Construction in progress - facilities

 

 

197,619

 

 

 

-

 

Software implementation in progress - ERP

 

 

245,501

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

$

1,759,086

 

 

$

1,581,814

 

 

During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company incurred $417,259 and $328,907 of depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment, respectively.

NOTE 7 – ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES

Accrued expenses and other liabilities consist of the following at December 31:

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Accrued compensation and related liabilities

 

$

1,183,653

 

 

$

457,152

 

Deferred revenue and customer deposits

 

 

1,135,470

 

 

 

1,033,845

 

Warranty reserve

 

 

416,313

 

 

 

56,774

 

Other accrued expenses

 

 

1,195,282

 

 

 

386,206

 

 

 

$

3,930,718

 

 

$

1,933,977

 

 

NOTE 8 – DEBT

Bank Lines of Credit

In May 2015, the Company entered into a credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with a financial institution which provides for a revolving line of credit and a term note payable. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement were collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets and the personal guarantee of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”).  Under the terms of the revolving line of credit, as amended on October 5, 2017, the line of credit was extended through August 31, 2018, and the unrestricted borrowing capacity was increased from $3,000,000 to $3,500,000.

Borrowings under the revolving line of credit bear interest at a LIBOR-based rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus 2.5% (totaling 3.93% at December 31, 2017), and interest is payable monthly. On February 5, 2018, the Company paid down the remaining outstanding balance on the line of credit.  On March 2, 2018, the Company cancelled its line of credit with the Bank of West and the personal guarantee of the Company’s CEO was released as a result.   

F-27


 

Bressner Technology has six revolving lines of credit with German institutions totaling 3,320,000.  Borrowing under the lines of credit bear interest at variable rates of Euribor plus a stated rate.  Current rates are between 3.75% and 7.99%.  The lines of credit are guaranteed by the managing director through March 31, 2019. Total outstanding balance as of December 31, 2018 was €369,567 (US $422,960).

Notes Payable

In May 2015, the Company issued a note payable in connection with the Credit Agreement totaling $1,250,000 (“May 2015 Note”).  Under the terms of the note agreement, interest accrued on the outstanding balance at 3.60% per annum.  The May 2015 Note required the Company to make monthly principal and interest payments totaling $36,750 through the maturity date.

In July 2016, the Company refinanced the Magma note payable (Note 2) and the May 2015 Note into a new $1,600,000 note payable (“Refinanced Note”).  Under the terms of the Refinanced Note, interest accrued on the outstanding balance at 3.80% per annum.  The Refinanced Note required the Company to make monthly principal and interest payments totaling $47,219 through the maturity date of July 31, 2019.  The note was paid in full on February 23, 2018.

In July 2016, the Company issued a note payable totaling $250,000 (“July 2016 Note”) to a third party.  Under the terms of the note agreement, interest accrued on the outstanding balance at 11% per annum.  The July 2016 Note requires the Company to make monthly principal and interest payments totaling $9,570 with a maturity date on January 15, 2019.  The note is unsecured and guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and is subordinated to borrowings under the Credit Agreement. The note was paid in full on February 15, 2018.  

In connection with July 2016 Note, the Company issued to the noteholder warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock equal to 20% of the original principal at a price per share equal to $1.78 per share. Accordingly, the Company issued to the noteholder warrants to purchase 28,090 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.78 per share in July 2016. The relative fair value of the warrants was $24,830.  The relative fair value of warrants was estimated using Black-Scholes with the following weighted-average assumptions: fair value of the Company’s common stock at issuance of $1.78 per share; seven year contractual term; 54% volatility; 0% dividend rate; and a risk-free interest rate of 1.42%.  

Bressner Technology GmbH has four term loans outstanding with a total balance outstanding of €1,242,554 (US$1,421,953) as follows:

Bressner entered into an unsecured note payable for working capital in August 2015, in the amount of €250,000 which bears interest at 2.125% which matures on August 12, 2019.  Quarterly payments of €15,600 are due at the beginning of each calendar quarter with remaining balance due at maturity.  The balance outstanding as of December 31, 2018 is €48,554 (US$55,563).

Bressner entered into a note payable in August 2016, in the amount of €250,000 which bears interest at 2.125% which matures on September 30, 2020.  The loan is guaranteed by the managing director of Bressner through March 31, 2019.  Quarterly payments of €15,600 are due at the end of each calendar quarter with remaining balance due at maturity.  The balance outstanding as of December 31, 2018 is €94,000 (US$107,572).

Bressner entered into an unsecured note payable for working capital in February 2017, in the amount of €800,000 which bears interest at a fixed interest rate of 1.00% which matures on March 31, 2019.  Quarterly payments of interest and fees are due at the end of each calendar quarter with the balance due at maturity.  The balance outstanding as of December 31, 2018 is €800,000 (US$915,504).

Bressner entered into a note payable in September 2017, in the amount of €400,000 which bears interest at 2.125% which matures on April 30, 2020.  The loan is guaranteed by the managing director of Bressner through March 31, 2019.  Quarterly payments of €25,000 are due in January, April, July and November with remaining balance due at maturity.  The balance outstanding as of December 31, 2018 is €300,000 (US$343,314).

F-28


 

Related-Party Notes Payable

In July 2016, the Company issued notes payable totaling $350,000 (“July 2016 Related Party Notes”) to two stockholders.  Under the terms of the note agreements, interest accrues on the outstanding balance at 11% per annum.  The July 2016 Related Party Notes require the Company to make total monthly principal and interest payments of $13,397 with maturity dates on January 15, 2019.  The notes are unsecured and guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and are subordinated to borrowings under the Credit Agreement. The note was paid in full on February 15, 2018.  

In connection with July 2016 Related Party Notes, the Company issued to the noteholders warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock equal to 20% of the original principal at a price per share equal to $1.78 per share. Accordingly, the Company issued to the noteholders warrants to purchase 39,326 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.78 per share in July 2016.

The relative fair value of the warrants was $34,763. The relative fair value of warrants was estimated using Black-Scholes with the following weighted-average assumptions: fair value of the Company’s common stock at issuance of $1.78 per share; seven year contractual term; 54% volatility; 0% dividend rate; and a risk-free interest rate of 1.42%.  

Debt Discount

The relative fair value of the warrants were recorded as debt discounts, decreasing notes payable and related-party notes payable and increasing additional paid-in capital on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The debt discounts are being amortized to interest expense over the terms of the corresponding notes payable using the straight-line method which approximates the effective interest method.

Total debt discount amortization was $24,830 and $23,837 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  Debt discount amortization is included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The debt discount was fully amortized to interest expense when the related notes were paid in full.  

A summary of notes payable as described above as of December 31, 2018 is as follows:

 

Loan Description

 

Current interest rate

 

Maturity date

Balance (Euro)

 

Balance ($)

 

Euro denominated term Loan 2015 - fixed

 

2.125%

 

2019

48,554

 

$

55,563

 

Euro denominated term Loan 2017/2 - fixed

 

1.000%

 

2019

 

800,000

 

 

915,504

 

Euro denominated term Loan 2016 - fixed

 

2.125%

 

2020

 

94,000

 

 

107,572

 

Euro denominated term Loan 2017 - fixed

 

2.150%

 

2020

 

300,000

 

 

343,314

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,242,554

 

$

1,421,953

 

Total future payments under the notes payable described above are as follows:

 

Years Ending December 31,

 

Total

 

2019

 

$

1,156,915

 

2020

 

 

265,038

 

2021

 

 

-

 

2022

 

 

-

 

2023

 

 

-

 

Total minimum payments

 

 

1,421,953

 

Current portion of note payable

 

 

(1,156,915

)

Note payable, net of current portion

 

$

265,038

 

 

 

F-29


 

NOTE 9 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation filed on December 14, 2017, authorizes the Company to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock and 50,000,000 shares of common stock. On February 1, 2018, in connection with the Company’s initial public offering, each share of the Company’s outstanding Series A, Series B, and Series C, Preferred Stock was automatically converted into a share of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 on a one-for-one basis.  

Common Stock

The voting, dividend and liquidation rights of the holders of the common stock are subject to rights of preferred stockholders, if any, as designated by the Board of Directors.  Common stockholders have voting rights at all meetings of stockholders and are entitled to one vote for each share held subject to certain limitations otherwise required by law.  Dividends may be declared and paid on the common stock as and when determined by the Board of Directors subject to any preferential dividend or other rights of preferred stockholders.  The Company does not anticipate declaring any dividends in the foreseeable future.  Upon the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, common stockholders are entitled to receive all assets of the Company, subject to any preferential or other rights of preferred stockholders.

 

Initial Public Offering

On December 18, 2017, the Company announced the commencement of an underwritten public offering of its common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. The offering became effective on January 31, 2018 and trading began on February 1, 2018.  On February 5, 2018, the Company closed the initial public offering selling an aggregate of 3,800,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $5.00 for total gross proceeds of $19,000,000, which resulted in net proceeds of $17,485,000, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $1,330,000 and underwriter offering-related transaction costs of $185,000. Additionally, the Company incurred costs associated with the transaction for accounting, legal and other fees and costs of $1,148,352 and a warrant expense of $699,408 for warrants issued to the underwriter pursuant to the underwriter agreement.  Such stock issuance costs have been deducted from the proceeds received from the underwriter and disclosed as net proceeds in the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity.

On February 9, 2018, the underwriters exercised their over-allotment option to purchase an additional 200,000 shares of common stock at the public offering price of $5.00 per share, of which 100,000 shares of newly issued common stock were purchased from the Company and 100,000 shares were sold by the Company’s CEO’s family trust.  The Company received gross proceeds of $500,000, which resulted in net proceeds to the Company of $465,000, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $35,000.

Warrants

In conjunction with the Company’s initial public offering, on February 1, 2018, the Company issued warrants to the underwriter to purchase 380,000 shares of common stock at a price of $6.00 pursuant to the Underwriting and Warrant Agreements dated February 1, 2018.

The fair value of the warrants was $699,408. The fair value of warrants was estimated using Black-Scholes with the following weighted-average assumptions: fair value of the Company’s common stock at issuance of $5.00 per share; five year contractual term; 42.7% volatility; 0% dividend rate; and a risk-free interest rate of 2.72%.  The warrant expense was treated as a stock issuance cost and was deducted from the gross proceeds received in the offering in the current period.  A corresponding increase in additional paid in capital was recognized in relation to this transaction.

Exercise of Stock Options

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued 391,578 shares of common stock for proceeds of $113,168 in cash related to the exercise of stock options.  Of the total shares issued, 290,879 shares of common stock were issued as a cashless exercise of stock options.  

F-30


 

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 140,220 shares of common stock for proceeds of $105,502, in cash related to the exercise of stock options.  

Preferred Stock

Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series, each of these series to have such terms as stated or expressed in resolutions providing for the issue of such series adopted by the Board of Directors.  Since February 1, 2018, there has been no outstanding preferred stock.

On December 14, 2017, the Company was reincorporated in the State of Delaware.  Prior to that date the Company was authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock and 11,000,000 share of common stock.  The authorized preferred stock had been further designated as follows:  500,000 as Series A Preferred Stock; 1,500,000 as Series B Preferred Stock; and 2,000,000 as Series C Preferred Stock.

The liquidation preferences of the preferred shares were as follows:

 

    Series C Preferred Stock

The liquidation preference is $1.50 per share, and the shares have liquidation preference over common stock, Series A Preferred Stock, and Series B Preferred Stock.

    Series B Preferred Stock

The liquidation preference is $0.50 per share, and the shares have liquidation preference over common stock and Series A Preferred Stock.

    Series A Preferred Stock

The liquidation preference is $0.25 per share, the shares have liquidation preference over common stock.

 

Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, and Series C Preferred Stock (“Preferred Shares”) were convertible at any time at the option of the holder into one share of common stock.  

In addition, preferred shares were automatically convertible into shares of common stock upon the date specified by the holders of a majority of the then outstanding shares of such securities, or the closing of a public offering of common stock with gross proceeds of not less than $10,000,000 at an offering price of not less than $5.00 per share.  Each of the Preferred Shares was non-redeemable, had no par value, was not eligible for dividends, unless declared, and the voting rights of the Preferred Shares was equivalent to the voting rights of common stock.

As a result of the Company’s initial public offering exceeding the gross proceeds requirements and the requisite offering price, all of the previously outstanding preferred stock was converted to common stock on February 1, 2018.

Regarding unissued preferred stock, the Board of Directors is authorized to determine or alter any or all of the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed upon wholly unissued series of preferred stock, and to fix or alter the number of shares comprising any such series and the designation thereof, or any of them, and to provide for rights and terms of redemption or conversion of the shares of any such series.

Stock Options

The Company maintained a stock option plan that was established in 2000 (“2000 Plan”).  In November 2008, the Company increased the maximum number of shares of the Company's common stock that were issuable under the 2000 Plan to 3,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock.  The 2000 Plan has expired and no future grants may be awarded under the 2000 Plan.

In December 2011, the Company adopted a stock option plan (“2011 Plan”) under which the Company may issue up to 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and, as of December 31, 2018, the Company had 240,000 shares of common stock remaining unissued under the 2011 Plan. The 2011 Plan was terminated by the Board of Directors on October 10, 2017, and accordingly, no shares are available for issuance under the 2011 Plan. The 2011 Plan will continue to govern outstanding awards granted thereunder.

F-31


 

In December 2015, the Company adopted a stock option plan (“2015 Plan”) under which the Company may issue up to 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and, as of December 31, 2018, the Company had 790,000 shares of common stock remaining unissued under the 2015 Plan. The terms of the 2011 Plan and 2015 Plan provided for the grant of incentive options to employees and non-statutory options to employees, directors and consultants of the Company. The 2015 Plan was terminated by the Board of Directors on October 10, 2017, and accordingly, no shares are available for issuance under the 2015 Plan. The 2015 Plan will continue to govern outstanding awards granted thereunder.

The Board of Directors adopted the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan on October 10, 2017 (the “2017 Plan”). The 2017 Plan allows for the grant of a variety of equity vehicles to provide flexibility in implementing equity awards, including incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock grants, unrestricted stock grants and restricted stock units and stock bonuses and performance-based awards.  On December 18, 2017, the Company stockholders approved the “2017 Plan” under which the Company may issue up to 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  

The exercise price per share for options under the 2011 Plan, 2015 Plan and 2017 Plan is determined by the Company’s Board of Directors, for incentive stock options the exercise price shall not be less than the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant, except that for incentive options granted to an owner/employee with a greater than 10% ownership interest in the Company, the exercise price shall not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant.

Options under the plans expire no more than ten years after the date of grant and/or within five years after the date of the grant for incentive options granted to an owner/employee with a greater than 10% ownership interest in the Company.

A summary of stock option activity under the plans during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:

 

 

 

Stock Options Outstanding

 

 

 

Number of

Shares

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

 

 

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life (in years)

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2017

 

 

2,271,824

 

 

$

0.72

 

 

5.16

 

 

$

795,890

 

Granted

 

 

360,000

 

 

$

1.95

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Forfeited / Cancelled

 

 

(112,160

)

 

$

0.75

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Exercised

 

 

(140,220

)

 

$

0.75

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

 

2,379,444

 

 

$

0.82

 

 

5.05

 

 

 

2,569,047

 

Granted

 

 

295,000

 

 

$

1.61

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Forfeited / Cancelled

 

 

(194,582

)

 

$

0.88

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Exercised

 

 

(511,115

)

 

$

0.85

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

 

 

1,968,747

 

 

$

1.14

 

 

 

5.04

 

 

$

1,806,411

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2018

 

 

1,640,370

 

 

$

0.85

 

 

 

4.30

 

 

$

1,783,460

 

Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2018

 

 

1,960,116

 

 

$

1.13

 

 

 

5.02

 

 

$

1,806,305

 

 

F-32


 

The following table summarizes information about common stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Options Outstanding

 

 

Stock Options Exercisable

 

Plan

 

Exercise Price Range

 

Number of

Shares

Outstanding

 

 

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life (in Years)

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

 

 

Number of

Shares

Exercisable

 

 

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life (in Years)

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

 

2000

 

$0.75

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

0.37

 

 

$

0.65

 

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

0.37

 

 

$

0.65

 

2011

 

$0.46-$0.84

 

 

994,289

 

 

 

3.56

 

 

$

0.58

 

 

 

994,289

 

 

 

3.56

 

 

$

0.58

 

2015

 

$1.08-$1.95

 

 

674,458

 

 

 

7.58

 

 

$

1.61

 

 

 

471,081

 

 

 

7.31

 

 

$

1.51

 

2017

 

$2.90-$4.09

 

 

125,000

 

 

 

9.61

 

 

$

3.77

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9.61

 

 

$

3.77

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,968,747

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,640,370

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table presents details of the assumptions used to calculate the weighted-average grant date fair value of common stock options granted by the Company:

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Expected term (in years)

 

5.4 - 5.9

 

 

5.3 - 5.9

 

Expected volatility

 

45.9 - 47.0 %

 

 

43.5 - 43.8%

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

2.70 - 3.00%

 

 

1.86  - 2.07%

 

Weighted average grant date fair value per share

 

$

1.61

 

 

$

0.85

 

Grant date fair value of options vested

 

$

536,666

 

 

$

1,546,692

 

Intrinsic value of options exercised

 

$

559,433

 

 

$

946,134

 

 

As of December 31, 2018, the amount of unearned stock-based compensation estimated to be expensed from 2019 through 2021 related to unvested common stock options is $308,556, net of estimated forfeitures. The weighted-average period over which the unearned stock-based compensation is expected to be recognized is 2.03 years.

If there are any modifications or cancellations of the underlying unvested awards, the Company may be required to accelerate, increase or cancel any remaining unearned stock-based compensation expense or calculate and record additional expense.  Future stock-based compensation expense and unearned stock-based compensation will increase to the extent that the Company grants additional common stock options or other stock-based awards.

Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock units may be granted at the discretion of the compensation committee of the Board of Directors under the 2017 Plan in connection with the hiring and retention of personnel and are subject to certain conditions.  Restricted stock units generally vest quarterly over a period of three years and are typically forfeited if employment is terminated before the restricted stock unit vest.  The compensation expense related to the restricted stock units is calculated as the fair value of the common stock on the grant date and is amortized to expense over the vesting period and is adjusted for estimated forfeitures.

F-33


 

The Company’s restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31 , 2018 is as follows:

 

 

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

 

 

Number of

Shares

 

 

Weighted

Average Grant

Date Fair Value

 

Unvested at January 1, 2018

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

Granted

 

 

225,000

 

 

$

4.13

 

Vested

 

 

(44,165

)

 

$

(4.14

)

Cancelled

 

 

(7,500

)

 

$

(4.17

)

Unvested at December 31, 2018

 

 

173,335

 

 

$

4.13

 

 

As of December 31, 2018, there was $512,357 of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock units which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.88 years.

 

Stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was comprised of the following:

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Stock-based compensation classified as:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative

 

$

432,734

 

 

$

111,681

 

Production

 

 

20,263

 

 

 

6,033

 

Marketing and selling

 

 

37,120

 

 

 

25,152

 

Research and development

 

 

37,218

 

 

 

17,196

 

Total

 

$

527,335

 

 

$

160,062

 

 

Warrants

 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued warrants to purchase 67,416 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.78 per share in connection with the July 2016 Note and the July 2016 Related Party Notes (Note 8).  The warrants are exercisable and have a weighted average remaining term of 3.72 years.

 

In connection with the Company’s initial public offering in 2018, the Company issued warrants to the underwriters to purchase 380,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share, as described above.

The following table summarizes the Company’s warrant activity during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:

 

 

 

Number of

Shares

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise Price

 

Warrants outstanding – January 1, 2017

 

 

198,996

 

 

$

1.11

 

Warrants granted

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Warrants exercised

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Warrants outstanding – December 31, 2017

 

 

198,996

 

 

$

1.11

 

Warrants granted

 

 

380,000

 

 

 

6.00

 

Warrants exercised

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Warrants outstanding – December 31, 2018

 

 

578,996

 

 

$

4.32

 

 

F-34


 

NOTE 10 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

The Company has a 401(k) retirement plan. Under the terms of the plan, eligible employees may defer up to 20% of their pre-tax earnings, subject to the Internal Revenue Service annual contribution limit. Additionally, the Plan allows for discretionary matching contributions by the Company.  In 2018 and 2017, the matching contributions were 100% of the employee's contribution up to a maximum of 5% of the employee’s annual compensation.  During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company contributed $323,828 and $269,230, respectively to the 401(k) Plan.

NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal

 

From time to time the Company is subject to various legal claims and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.  In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of any such matters as of December 31, 2018, will not have a materially adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

Guarantees and Indemnities

 

The Company has made certain indemnities, under which it may be required to make payments to an indemnified party, in relation to certain transactions.  The Company indemnifies its directors, officers, employees and agents to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware.  In connection with its facility lease, the Company has indemnified its lessor for certain claims arising from the use of the facilities.  Also, in connection with its Credit Agreement (Note 8), the Company has agreed to indemnify its lender and others related to the use of the proceeds and other matters.  The duration of the indemnities varies, and in many cases is indefinite.  These indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make.  Historically, the Company has not been obligated to make any payments for these obligations and no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Leases

 

The Company leases its offices, manufacturing, and warehouse facility in San Diego County under a non-cancelable operating lease. Our corporate headquarters are in a leased space comprising approximately 24,032 square feet in Escondido, California under a lease that was renewed in August 2018 and now expires in August 2024.  We also lease a 3,208 square foot facility in Salt Lake City, Utah that houses our Ion software development team. CDI is the lessee of approximately 12,000 square feet located in Irvine, California with the lease expiring in June 2021.  Bressner Technology, which was acquired in October 2018, leases space comprising 8,073 square feet which lease expires in December 2019.  

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, rent expense was $630,830 and $488,916, respectively.  

Future annual minimum rental commitments under operating leases as of December 31, 2018, are as follows:

 

Year Ending December 31,

 

Amount payable

 

2019

 

$

867,281

 

2020

 

 

624,260

 

2021

 

 

390,055

 

2022

 

 

302,363

 

2023

 

 

311,433

 

Thereafter

 

 

211,734

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

$

2,707,126

 

 

F-35


 

NOTE 12 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

The Company has engaged an advertising firm whose president is a member of the Board of Directors of the Company. Amounts paid to this company are included in marketing and selling expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, totaled $34,495 and $36,545, respectively.

The Company has appointed certain stockholders to the Board of Directors.  Director fees paid by the Company, including stock-based compensation, for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 totaled $232,268 and $144,561, respectively, and are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The Company engaged a related-party accounting firm (a principal of that firm owns shares in the Company) to provide tax preparation and consulting services.  Amounts paid to this accounting firm are included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 and totaled $15,750.

The Company has engaged a related-party law firm (a principal of that firm owns shares in the Company) to provide legal services. Legal fees paid to this firm are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and totaled $208,178 and $91,763, respectively.

The Company issued notes payable to Series B preferred stockholders totaling $350,000 during the year ended December 31, 2016.  In connection with the issuance of the July 2016 Related Party Notes during the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued warrants to purchase 39,326 shares of common stock at $1.78 per share (Notes 8 and 9).  

Interest expense on all related-party notes payable for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 totaled $16,599 and $40,749, respectively.

Effective August 1, 2016, the Company entered into a management services agreement with a company owned by the former Chief Executive Officer of Magma.  The agreement calls for payments of $180,000 per year for the first two years paid in monthly installments.  In year three, the amount is reduced to $37,500 for the year paid in monthly installments.  Additionally, the Company granted 30,000 options in conjunction with execution of this agreement.  Payments for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $120,625 and $180,000, respectively.

NOTE 13 – INCOME TAXES

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, pre-tax income (loss) was attributed to the following jurisdictions:

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Domestic operations

 

$

(2,791,005

)

 

$

(316,684

)

Foreign operations

 

 

257,943

 

 

 

10,587

 

 

 

$

(2,533,062

)

 

$

(306,097

)

 

The amounts reflected in the table above do not include net losses attributable to Noncontrolling interest in SkyScale.

 

F-36


 

Set forth below is the (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31:

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

(20,391

)

 

$

10,000

 

State

 

 

1,202

 

 

 

800

 

International

 

 

109,998

 

 

 

3,097

 

 

 

 

90,809

 

 

 

13,897

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

(817,523

)

 

 

(202,725

)

State

 

 

(670,070

)

 

 

(256,927

)

International

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

(1,487,593

)

 

 

(459,652

)

Adjustment to deferred taxes for tax rate change

 

 

-

 

 

 

43,038

 

Total benefit for income taxes

 

$

(1,396,784

)

 

$

(402,717

)

 

The reconciliation of the (benefit) for income taxes computed at federal statutory rates to the provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, are as follows:

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Provision at federal statutory rates

 

$

(623,575

)

 

$

(210,547

)

State income taxes, net

 

 

(556,019

)

 

 

(187,315

)

Research credits

 

 

(210,567

)

 

 

(175,938

)

Transaction costs

 

 

126,212

 

 

 

-

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

(472,064

)

 

 

22,965

 

Noncontrolling interest

 

 

115,320

 

 

 

133,605

 

Federal deferred revaluation

 

 

-

 

 

 

43,038

 

Uncertain tax provision

 

 

(10,000

)

 

 

10,000

 

Other

 

 

233,909

 

 

 

(38,525

)

 

 

$

(1,396,784

)

 

$

(402,717

)

 

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.  The 2017 balances reflect the revaluation for the reduction in the Federal corporate rate to 21%.  Significant components of deferred taxes as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reserves

 

$

18,877

 

 

$

88,243

 

Accrued expenses

 

 

284,364

 

 

 

90,348

 

Deferred compensation

 

 

217,994

 

 

 

178,591

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

158,196

 

 

 

113,726

 

Inventories

 

 

158,967

 

 

 

355,387

 

Credits and loss carryforward

 

 

3,268,535

 

 

 

1,539,791

 

Total deferred tax assets before valuation allowance

 

 

4,106,933

 

 

 

2,366,086

 

Less:  valuation allowance

 

 

(183,048

)

 

 

-

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

 

3,923,885

 

 

 

2,366,086

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment

 

 

(151,927

)

 

 

(229,129

)

Intangible assets

 

 

(1,009,293

)

 

 

(602,126

)

Other

 

 

(257,033

)

 

 

(216,384

)

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(1,418,253

)

 

 

(1,047,639

)

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

2,505,632

 

 

$

1,318,447

 

F-37


 

 

The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those differences become deductible.  Management considers the scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.  Management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of the net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, California and Germany and has open tax statutes for U.S. federal taxes for the years ended December 31, 2015 through 2017.  For California the open tax statutes are for years December 31, 2014 through 2017 and for Germany the open years include December 31, 2016 and 2017.

 

The Company has Federal net operating loss (“NOL’) carryforwards as of December 31, 2017, of approximately $1,400,000.  The Company may use these NOL carryforwards to offset Federal taxable income in future years through 2037, when the last (Pre-2018) NOL carryforwards expired.  The Company also has a Federal NOL carryforward as of December 31, 2018, of $3,200,000.  The Company may use this NOL carryforward indefinitely to offset 80% of Federal taxable income in future years.  In addition, the Company has state NOL carryforwards of $2,500,000.  State NOLs will carry forward through at least 2038 and may be used to offset future state taxable income.

As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company has $1,271,352 and $501,573 of federal tax credit carryforwards which begin to expire in 2026 and state credit carryforwards of $957,243 and $634,560 which carryforward indefinitely.

As of December 31, 2018, the unrecognized tax benefits associated with uncertain tax positions was $262,784, and such amount is included in other accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  If recognized, this would affect the Company’s effective tax rate.  

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

137,228

 

Gross increases for tax positions of prior years

 

 

-

 

Gross decreases for tax positions of prior years

 

 

-

 

Gross increases for tax positions of the current year

 

 

66,438

 

Settlements

 

 

-

 

Lapse of statute of limitations

 

 

(200

)

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2017

 

 

203,466

 

Gross increases for tax positions of prior years

 

 

-

 

Gross decreases for tax positions of prior years

 

 

-

 

Gross increases for tax positions of the current year

 

 

59,318

 

Settlements

 

 

-

 

Lapse of statute of limitations

 

 

 

 

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2018

 

$

262,784

 

 

The liability for uncertain tax positions is reviewed quarterly and adjusted as events occur that affect potential liabilities for additional taxes, such as lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, proposed assessments by tax authorities, negotiations with taxing authorities, identification of new issues, and enactment of new legislation, regulations or promulgation of new case law.  Management believes that adequate amounts of tax and related interest, if any, have been provided for any adjustments that may result from these examinations of uncertain tax positions.  The Company does not expect the liability for uncertain tax positions to change significantly over the next year.  The Company’s practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

F-38


 

NOTE 14 –NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE

 

Basic and diluted net (loss) income per share was calculated as follows for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:

 

 

 

For The Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Basic and diluted net (loss) income per share attributable to common

   stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) attributable to common stockholders

 

$

(1,136,278

)

 

$

96,620

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic

 

 

12,586,513

 

 

 

5,449,413

 

Effect of dilutive securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,239,634

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted

 

 

12,586,513

 

 

 

10,689,047

 

Net (loss) income per common share attributable to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(0.09

)

 

$

0.02

 

Diluted

 

$

(0.09

)

 

$

0.01

 

 

NOTE 15 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

The Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy to classify and disclose all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, in periods subsequent to their initial measurement.  These tiers include:

 

Level 1, defined as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

 

Level 2, defined as inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

 

Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

The carrying value of financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued expenses, lines of credit, and other liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.  Assets and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of  the Ion software, Concept Development Inc., and Bressner Technology GmbH were recorded at fair value based upon the Company’s market assumptions which approximated carrying value (except for acquired intangible assets – Note 2) due to the short-term nature of the instruments.  The carrying amounts of Bressner’s existing lines of credit and notes payable approximate their fair values at the stated interest rates and are reflective of the prevailing market rates.

NOTE 16 – SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

The Company operates in one reportable segments: the design and manufacture of high-performance computer systems and components. The Company evaluates financial performance on a company-wide basis.

To date, a majority of the Company’s international sales relate to shipments of products to its U.S. customers’ international manufacturing sites or third- party hubs. Net revenue derived from shipments to international destinations represented approximately 57% and 53% of the Company’s net product sales in 2018 and 2017 respectively. All of the Company’s net product sales to date have been denominated in U.S. dollars.

As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, substantially all the Company’s long-lived assets were located in the United States of America with additional assets of approximately $338,468 located in Germany as of December 2018.

F-39


 

NOTE 17 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

The Company has evaluated subsequent events after the consolidated balance sheet date of December 31, 2018 through the date of filing.  Based upon the Company’s evaluation, management has determined that, other than as disclosed in the accompanying notes, no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the accompanying consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes thereto.

 

On January 8, 2019, Bressner entered into an agreement for a new line of credit for € 2,000,000 at a variable interest rate of Euribor plus “three-month money” (currently at 4%) with Hypo Vereinsbank, a member of UniCredit Bank AG, Munchen.

 

On February 13, 2019, Messrs. Cooper, Morrison, and Ison received restricted stock unit (RSU’s) grants of 30,000, 15,000 and 10,000, respectively of shares of our common stock.   The RSU’s vest over three years, with equal semi-annual installments over a period of three years, subject to continued employment with the Company on each vesting date.

 

On February 26, 2019, Bressner entered into an agreement with an effective date of March 31, 2019, for a loan in the amount of  € 500,000 which bears interest at 2.25% annually requiring monthly payments of €22,232 per month with UniCredit Bank AG, Munchen. This loan matures on March 31, 2021.

As of March 21, 2019, the Company has received two funding commitments in the amount of $2.0 million each from two members of the Board of Directors through April 1, 2020.

 

 

 

F-40


 

Exhibit Index

 

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

 

 

 

  2.1(7)

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated August 22, 2018, with Concept Development Inc.

 

 

 

  2.2 (8)

 

Share Purchase Agreement, dated October 31, 2018, with Bressner Technology GmbH.

 

 

 

  3.1(1)

 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (currently in effect).

 

 

 

  3.2(2)

 

Bylaws, as amended (currently in effect).

 

 

 

  4.1(4)

 

From of Common Stock Certificate of One Stop Systems, Inc.

 

 

 

  4.2(3)

 

Second Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated January 2007.

 

 

 

  4.3(3)

 

Common Shareholder Piggyback Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 15, 2016.

 

 

 

  4.4(5)

 

Form of Warrant issued to Roth Capital Partners, LLC in connection with One Stop Systems, Inc.’s initial public offering.

 

 

 

  4.5(3)

 

Form of Common Stock Warrant issued to investors in connection with note financings.

 

 

 

10.1+(4)

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement between One Stop Systems, Inc. and each its directors and executive officers.

 

 

 

10.2+(3)

 

One Stop Systems, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan and related form agreements.

 

 

 

10.3+(3)

 

One Stop Systems, Inc. 2011 Stock Option Plan and related form agreements.

 

 

 

10.4+(3)

 

One Stop Systems, Inc. 2015 Stock Option Plan and related form agreements.

 

 

 

10.5+(3)

 

One Stop Systems, Inc. 2017 Stock Equity Incentive Plan and related form agreements.

 

 

 

10.6+(3)

 

Executive Employment Agreement between One Stop Systems, Inc. and Steve Cooper, dated October 1, 2017.

 

 

 

10.7+(3)

 

Executive Employment Agreement between One Stop Systems, Inc. and Jim Ison, dated October 1, 2017 .

 

 

 

10.8(4)

 

Business Loan Agreement and Promissory Note, dated May 6, 2015 by and between One Stop Systems, Inc. and Bank of the West, as amended.

 

 

 

10.9(4)

 

Lease Agreement dated October 21, 2004, as amended.

 

 

 

10.10(3)

 

Contribution Agreement for SkyScale, LLC by and between Jacoma Investments, LLC and One Stop Systems, Inc., dated April 11, 2017.

 

 

 

10.11(4)

 

Technology Source Code License Agreement by and between Western Digital Technologies, Inc. and One Stop Systems, Inc., dated May 9, 2017.

 

 

 

10.12(4)

 

Services Agreement by and between Western Digital Technologies, Inc. and One Stop Systems, Inc., dated July 1, 2017.

 

 

 

10.13(4)

 

Original Equipment Manufacturing and Supply Agreement by and between disguise (formerly d3 Technologies) and One Stop Systems, Inc., dated October 1, 2015.

 

 

 

10.14(7)

 

Piggyback Registration Rights Agreement by and between One Stop Systems, Inc. and James M. Reardon, dated August 31, 2018.

 

 

 

23.1

 

Consent of Haskell & White LLP, independent registered public accounting firm

 

 

 

83


 

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

31.1

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.1*

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.2*

 

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

(1)

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 21, 2018.

(2)

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 6, 2018.

(3)

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-222121) filed with the SEC on December 18, 2017.

(4)

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-222121) filed with the SEC on January 16, 2018.

(5)

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2018.

(6)

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 3, 2018.

(7)

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 6, 2018.

(8)

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 6, 2018.

+

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.

*

These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this annual report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

84


 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized .

 

 

ONE STOP SYSTEMS, INC.

 

Date:  March 21, 2019

By:

/s/ Steve Cooper

 

 

Steve Cooper

 

 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Name

 

Title

 

Date

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Steve Cooper

 

President, Chief Executive Officer and

Chairman(Principal Executive Officer)

 

March 21, 2019

Steve Cooper

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ John W. Morrison Jr.

 

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

 

March 21, 2019

John W. Morrison Jr.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Kimberly Sentovich

 

Director

 

March 21, 2019

Kimberly Sentovich

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Kenneth Potashner

 

Director

 

March 21, 2019

Kenneth Potashner

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ John Reardon

 

Director

 

March 21, 2019

John Reardon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Randy Jones

 

Director

 

March 21, 2019

Randy Jones

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Jack Harrison

 

Director

 

March 21, 2019

Jack Harrison

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ David Raun

 

Director

 

March 21, 2019

David Raun

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

85

Exhibit 23.1

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-227671) of One Stop Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) of our report dated March 21, 2019, relating to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

 

/s/ Haskell & White LLP

HASKELL & WHITE LLP

 

 

Irvine, California

March 21, 2019

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steve Cooper, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual  report on Form 10-K of One Stop Systems, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

[paragraph omitted in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)];

 

(c)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: March 21, 2019

 

By:

/s/ Steve Cooper

 

 

 

Steve Cooper

 

 

 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John W. Morrison Jr., certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual  report on Form 10-K of One Stop Systems, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

[paragraph omitted in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)];

 

(c)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: March 21, 2019

 

By:

/s/ John W. Morrison Jr.

 

 

 

John W. Morrison Jr.

 

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of One Stop Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steve Cooper, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  March 21, 2019

 

By:

/s/ Steve Cooper

 

 

 

Steve Cooper

 

 

 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of One Stop Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John W. Morrison Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  March 21, 2019

 

By:

/s/ John W. Morrison Jr.

 

 

 

John W. Morrison Jr.

 

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)