Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1. Organization and Business Description

These financial statements reflect the consolidated operations of Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (“SIC” or the “Company”).

SIC is a Delaware corporation that was restructured in November 2017 to be a holding company through which to consolidate diversified building products and services companies.  Through its two primary operating subsidiaries and segments, Residential Design Services (“RDS”) and Architectural Surfaces Group (“ASG”), the Company imports and distributes natural and engineered stone slabs for kitchen and bathroom countertops, operates design centers that merchandise interior products, and provides installation services. RDS interior product offerings include flooring, cabinets, countertops and wall tile.  RDS operates throughout the United States, including in California, Nevada, Arizona, Texas, Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, and Georgia.  ASG has operations in the Northeast, Southeast, Southwest, Midwest, Mountain West, and West Coast regions of the United States.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and applicable rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting.  Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.  As such, the information included in these unaudited interim financial statements and condensed notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019 included herein has been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements as of that date, but does not include all disclosures including notes required by GAAP.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SIC, its wholly owned subsidiaries, RDS and ASG, and their respective wholly-owned subsidiaries, and are presented in accordance with GAAP.  All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in combination.  References to the “ASC” hereafter refer to the Accounting Standards Codification established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) as the source of authoritative GAAP.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods, but are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be anticipated for the full year ending December 31, 2020.

There have been no changes to our significant accounting policies described in our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures as of December 31, 2019 that have had a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes.

5

Earnings (Loss) per Share of Common Stock

Basic earnings (loss) per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share for common stock is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus the dilutive effect of restricted stock-based awards using the treasury stock method. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings/(loss) per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019:

All restricted stock awards outstanding consisting of 2,787,332 shares of restricted stock at September 30, 2020, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share in the nine months ended September 30, 2020, because the Company reported a net loss and the effect of inclusion would have been antidilutive.  

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, contingencies, and reported revenues and expenses as of and for periods ended on the date of the consolidated financial statements. Actual results may vary materially from the estimates that were used. The Company’s significant accounting estimates include the determination of allowances for doubtful accounts, the lives and methods for recording depreciation and amortization on property and equipment, the fair value of reporting units and indefinite life intangible assets, deferred income taxes and the purchase price allocations used in the Company’s acquisitions.

Fair Value Measurement

ASC 820-10 requires entities to disclose the fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities recognized and not recognized on the balance sheet for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. ASC 820-10 defines the fair value of a financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties.

6

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1—Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access.

Level 2—Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3—Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable, supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The level of the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurement falls is determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The Company records contingent consideration, or earn-outs, associated with certain acquisitions.  These earn-outs are adjusted to fair value at each reporting period and any change to fair value based on a change in certain factors, such as the discount rate or estimates for the outcome of specified milestone goals, will result in an adjustment to the fair value of the liability. These adjustments will be recorded to (income) expense as a measurement period adjustment.  

The earn-out liability associated with the acquisition of Summit Stoneworks, LLC (“Summit”) in August 2018 was reduced to zero as of December 31, 2019 and was no longer a Level 3 fair value estimate as the underlying inputs were known and the earn-out target criteria were not met as of December 31, 2019. Adjustments reducing the fair value of the earn-out liability by $1.9 million were recorded within other (income) expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. No adjustment was recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2019.

The earn-out liability associated with the acquisition of T.A.C. Ceramic Tile Co, LLC (“TAC”) in December 2018 was reduced to zero as of December 31, 2019 and was no longer a Level 3 fair value estimate as the underlying inputs were known and the earn-out target criteria were not met as of December 31, 2019. Adjustments decreasing the fair value of the earn-out liability by $0.6 million and increasing the earn-out liability by $0.6 million were recorded within other (income) expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively.

The earn-out liability associated with the acquisition of Intown Design, Inc., Intown Granite of Charlotte, Inc., and Granitec, LLC, (collectively, “Intown”) in March 2019 had a recorded fair value of zero at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.  The earn-out liability is no longer a Level 3 fair value estimate as the underlying inputs are now known and the earn-out target criteria were not met.  An adjustment decreasing the fair value of the earn-out liability by $1.4 million was recorded within other (income) expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. No adjustment was recorded during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2020.

At September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the carrying value of the Company’s cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and short-term obligations approximate their respective fair values because of the short maturities of these instruments. The recorded values of the line of credit, term loans, and notes payable approximate their fair values, as interest rates approximate market rates. There were no transfers within Level 3 fair value measurements during the three months ended September 30, 2020.  There were no transfers during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, other than the Intown earn-out liability out of Level 3 due to the availability of observable and known inputs to calculate the fair value of the liability as of September 30, 2020.

7

Business Combinations

The Company records business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method of accounting, identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their acquisition date fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value is recorded as goodwill. The measurement period remains open pending the completion of valuation procedures related to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities.  Measurement period adjustments are reflected in the period in which they occur.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate the carrying value of the asset or asset group may not be recoverable, or at least annually. The assessment for possible impairment is based on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of the asset or asset group from the expected future undiscounted cash flows of the related operations. If the aggregate of these cash flows is less than the carrying value of such assets, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value. The measurement of impairment requires management to estimate future cash flows and the fair value of long-lived assets. There were no impairment losses on long-lived assets for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2020 or the year ended December 31, 2019.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the fair value of the acquired net assets, including intangible assets. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment on December 31.  Impairment indicators existed as of March 31, 2020 surrounding the decrease in the Company’s stock price, significant adverse changes in the business climate and other macroeconomic conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company performed a goodwill impairment test as of March 31, 2020. The Company identified RDS and ASG as reporting units and determined each reporting unit’s fair value exceeded such reporting unit’s carrying value. No additional impairment indicators were identified during the three months ended September 30, 2020.  There were no impairment charges related to goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 or the year ended December 31, 2019.  

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenue derived from the sale of imported granite, marble, and related items, primarily in our ASG operating segment, is recognized at a point in time when control over a product is transferred to a customer. This transfer occurs primarily when goods are picked up by a customer at the branch or when goods are delivered to a customer location.

The Company’s contracts with its home builder customers within our RDS operating segment are usually short-term in nature and will generally range in length from several days to several weeks. The Company’s contracts related to multi-family and commercial projects are generally long-term in nature.  We recognize revenue from both short-term and long-term contracts for each distinct performance obligation identified over time on a percentage-of-completion basis of accounting, utilizing the output method as a measure of progress, as we believe this represents the best measure of when goods and services are transferred to the customer.  

Revenue is measured at the transaction price, which is based on the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring the promised goods or services to the customer. The transaction price includes estimates of variable consideration, such as any returns and sales incentives. Applicable customer sales taxes, when remitted, are recorded as a liability and excluded from revenue on a net basis. Customer payments may be due in advance of contract work performed, at the time the performance obligation is completed, or with payment terms following performance completion of generally 30-60 days.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, the new accounting standard under ASC Topic 606, using the modified retrospective method as of January 1, 2019.  The results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 have not been adjusted to reflect the adoption of ASU 2014-09.  (See Note 3).  

Shipping and Handling Charges

Fees charged to customers for shipping and handling of product are included in revenues. The costs for shipping and handling of product are recorded as a component of cost of revenue.  Additionally, we consider shipping and handling costs charged to a customer as a fulfillment cost rather than a promised service and expense as incurred.

Equity-based Compensation

The Company accounts for equity-based awards by measuring the awards at the date of grant and recognizing the grant-date fair value as an expense using either straight-line or accelerated attribution, depending on the specific terms of the award agreements over the requisite service period, which is usually equivalent to the vesting period. See Note 12 for further discussion.

8

Segment Reporting

In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-1, an operating segment is a component of an entity that has all of the following characteristics:

The Company has identified two operating segments that meet all three of the above criteria, RDS and ASG. Each of these operating segments provides products and services that generate revenue and incur expenses as it engages in business activities, and each maintains discrete financial information. Additionally, the Company’s chief operating decision maker, its Chief Executive Officer, reviews financial performance, approves budgets and allocates resources at each of the RDS and ASG operating segment levels.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). The JOBS Act permits emerging growth companies to take advantage of an extended transition period to comply with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies. The Company has elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards under Section 107 of the JOBS Act. This election allows the Company to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The ASU establishes a comprehensive revenue recognition standard for virtually all industries in U.S. GAAP, including those that previously followed industry-specific guidance, such as the real estate, construction, and software industries. The ASU core principal is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. During 2014-2016, the FASB issued various amendments to this topic and the amendments clarified certain positions and extended the implementation date until annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018.  During the quarter ended December 31, 2019, the Company adopted this guidance on a modified retrospective basis. For contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2019, revenue related to our short-term contracts with homebuilder customers, primarily in our RDS operating segment, are now recognized over time based on the extent of progress towards completion of the individual performance obligations, instead of under the completed contract method, because of continuous transfer of control to the customer.  There was no material impact on our revenue recognition for our multi-family contracts that are currently recognized under the existing percentage-of-completion method of accounting, due to the comparable methodology of revenue recognition under the updated guidance. There was also no material impact from adoption related to our sales of imported granite, marble, and related items of our ASG operating segment, as the Company has concluded that it has substantially similar performance obligations and recognition timing under the amended guidance.  The Company recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on January 1, 2019 of approximately $1.2 million. (See Note 3).  

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) - Disclosure Framework (ASU 2018-13). The updated guidance improves the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The updated guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019.  The adoption of ASU 2018-13 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

9

Accounting Pronouncements Issued but Not Yet Adopted

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous standards. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-10, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates, and in June 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-05, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates for Certain Entities, to defer the effective date of ASU No.2016-02 for certain entities. For the Company, the new standard is effective for annual periods beginning January 1, 2022.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of ASU 2016-02 on the presentation of its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” (ASU 2016-03) which amends ASC 326 “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses.”  Subsequent to the issuance of ASU 2016-13, ASC 326 was amended by various updates that amend and clarify the impact and implementation of the aforementioned update.  The new guidance introduces the current expected credit loss (CECL) model, which will require an entity to record an allowance for credit losses for certain financial instruments and financial assets, including trade receivables, based on expected losses rather than incurred losses.  Under this update, on initial recognition and at each reporting period, an entity will be required to recognize an allowance that reflects the entity’s current estimate of credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the financial instrument.  In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-10, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates which delays the effective date of ASU 2016-13 until fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of ASU 2016-13 on the presentation of its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which simplifies the goodwill impairment test by eliminating the step 2 requirement to determine the fair value of its assets and liabilities at the impairment testing date. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2021. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) No. 2018-15 Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (ASU 2018-15). ASU 2018-15 provides additional guidance on the accounting for costs of implementation activities performed in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract. The amendments in ASU 2018-15 align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). Costs for implementation activities in the application development stage are capitalized depending on the nature of the costs, while costs incurred during the preliminary project and post implementation stages are expensed as the activities are performed. ASU 2018-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020.  Early adoption of the amendments in ASU 2018-15 is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for all entities. The amendments in ASU 2018-15 should be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. The Company is currently assessing the effect this guidance may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes” which amends ASC 740 “Income Taxes” (ASC 740). This update is intended to simplify accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in ASC 740 and amending existing guidance to improve consistent application of ASC 740. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021.  The guidance in this update has various elements, some of which are applied on a prospective basis and others on a retrospective basis with earlier application permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Note 3. Revenue

The Company’s revenue derived from the sale of imported granite, marble, and related items, primarily in our ASG operating segment, is recognized at a point in time when control over a product is transferred to a customer. This transfer occurs primarily when goods are picked up by a customer at the branch or when goods are delivered to a customer location.

The Company’s contracts with its home builder customers within our RDS operating segment are usually short-term in nature and will generally range in length from several days to several weeks.  The Company’s contracts related to multi-family and commercial projects are generally long-term in nature. The Company recognizes revenue from both short-term and long-term contracts for each distinct performance obligation identified over time on a percentage-of-completion basis of accounting, utilizing the output method as a measure of progress, as the Company believes this represents the best measure of when goods and services are transferred to the customer.  

10

In the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, the new accounting standard under ASC Topic 606, using the modified retrospective method as of January 1, 2019.  The results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 have not been adjusted to reflect the adoption of ASU 2014-09.  The impact of adoption of ASU 2014-09 was approximately $1.6 million and $1.5 million to net revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively.  

Contract Balances

The timing of revenue recognition, billings, and cash collections results in billed accounts receivable, revenue in excess of billings, customer deposits, and billings in excess of revenue recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Contract assets

The Company’s contract assets consist of unbilled amounts typically resulting from sales under contracts when the revenue recognized exceeds the amount billed to the customer, generally in the RDS operating segment revenues derived from homebuilders and commercial and multifamily projects. Contract assets are recorded in other current assets in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.  The Company had contract assets of $14.2 million and $5.7 million as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.  The Company’s contract assets generally become unconditional and are reclassified to receivables in the quarter subsequent to each balance sheet date.

Contract liabilities

The Company records contract liabilities when it receives payment prior to fulfilling a performance obligation or has billings in excess of revenue recognized. Contract liabilities related to revenues are recorded in customer deposits in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company had total contract liabilities of $10.4 million and $8.6 million as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.  Contract liabilities are normally recognized to net sales within three to six months subsequent to each balance sheet date.

Remaining Performance Obligations

Remaining performance obligations related to ASC 606 represent the aggregate transaction price allocated to performance obligations with an original contract term greater than one year which are fully or partially unsatisfied at the end of the period, and relate primarily to multi-family or commercial revenue.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, multi-family and commercial projects accounted for approximately 3.6% and 2.5% of the Company’s consolidated revenues, respectively.  For the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, multi-family and commercial projects accounted for approximately 4.8% and 2.3% of the Company’s consolidated revenues, respectively.  As of September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to remaining uncompleted contracts was $3.5 million and $4.5 million, respectively. The Company expects to satisfy remaining performance obligations and recognize revenue on substantially all of these uncompleted contracts over the next 12 months.  The Company does not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with an original expected length of one year or less.

Revenue from contracts with customers is disaggregated differently for each reporting segment as this is how management evaluates the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows as affected by economic factors.  RDS operating segment revenues are disaggregated by geographic area within the United States.  ASG operating segment revenues are disaggregated by product category.

The following table presents net revenue for the RDS operating segment disaggregated by geographical area for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020:

The East consists of Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina and Georgia; the Central consists of Texas, and the West consists of California, Nevada and Arizona.

11

The following table presents net revenue for the ASG operating segment disaggregated by product category for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020:

Note 4. Concentrations, Risks and Uncertainties

The Company maintains cash balances primarily at one commercial bank. The accounts are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $0.25 million. The amounts held at this financial institution periodically exceed the federally insured limit. Management believes that this financial institution is financially sound and the risk of loss is minimal.

Credit is extended for some customers and is based on financial condition, and generally, collateral is not required. Credit losses are included in the consolidated financial statements and consistently have been within management’s expectations.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, there were no customers which accounted for 10.0% or more of the Company’s total revenues.  There were no customers which accounted for 10.0% or more of total accounts receivable as of September 30, 2020 or December 31, 2019.

Note 5. Acquisitions

Intown Acquisition

On March 1, 2019, RDS acquired the assets of Intown Design, Inc., Intown Granite of Charlotte, Inc., and Granitec, LLC, (collectively, “Intown”), an installer of residential and light commercial countertops and cabinets, for total cash consideration of $10.7 million at closing and an additional $0.8 million of purchase price adjustments that were funded in June 2019.  The purchase agreement also provided for potential earn-out consideration to the former shareholders of Intown in connection with the achievement of certain 2019 and 2020 financial milestones. The final earn-out payment had no maximum limit, but if certain targets were not met, there would be no earn-out payment. The contingent earn-out consideration had an estimated purchase price fair value of $2.0 million as of March 31, 2019.  As of December 31, 2019, the fair value of the earn-out was reduced to zero.  The earn-out targets were not met during the earn-out period which concluded during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, and no consideration was paid for the earn-out.  

The upfront cash paid for the Intown acquisition was financed with additional borrowings from the Company’s third-party financing agreement described in Note 10. The Intown acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting, and the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including identifiable intangible assets, were recorded based on their respective fair values as of the acquisition date.  The total purchase price consisted of the following:

RDS acquired Intown to further diversify RDS’ geographic mix and channel strength.  The goodwill recorded reflects the strategic value of the acquisition beyond the net value of its assets acquired less liabilities assumed. Goodwill of $0.1 million was deductible for tax purposes.

12

The Company incurred approximately $0.4 million in direct acquisition costs, all of which were expensed as incurred, and were included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.  The Company performed a valuation of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities of Intown. Using the total consideration for the acquisition, the Company performed an allocation of such assets and liabilities. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price as of the transaction’s closing date.

From the date of acquisition to September 30, 2019, Intown generated revenue of $12.3 million and net income of $1.7 million, which were included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, Intown generated revenue of $14.2 million and net income of less than $0.1 million.  

Pro Forma Results

The following unaudited pro forma information for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was prepared to give effect to the acquisition of Intown as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2019. This pro forma information does not purport to represent what the actual results of operations of the Company would have been had the Intown acquisition occurred on such date, nor does it purport to predict the results of operations for future periods.

Our pro forma assumptions are as follows:

13

Depreciation and amortization expense of property and equipment totaled $2.6 million and $2.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. For three months ended September 30, 2020, $1.1 million and $1.5 million of depreciation expense was included in cost of goods sold and general and administrative expense, respectively. For three months ended September 30, 2019, $1.0 million and $1.1 million of depreciation expense was included in cost of goods sold and general and administrative expense, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization expense of property and equipment totaled $7.6 million and $6.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, $3.2 million and $4.4 million of depreciation expense was included in cost of goods sold and general and administrative expense, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, $2.7 million and $3.4 million of depreciation expense was included in cost of goods sold and general and administrative expense, respectively.

Note 8. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

The carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment is as follows as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019:

14

15

The following table provides the gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization and net book value by reportable segment for each class of intangible assets as of December 31, 2019:

Amortization expense on intangible assets totaled $3.2 million and $9.6 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively. Amortization expense on intangible assets totaled $4.0 million and $12.6 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively.

The estimated annual amortization expense for the next five years and thereafter is as follows:

Note 9. Lines of Credit

SIC Line of Credit

In June 2018, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into an amended and restated loan, security and guaranty agreement, dated as of June 28, 2018, which was amended on December 11, 2018, July 23, 2019 and August 19, 2019 (“SIC Credit Facility”), with a commercial bank, which amended and restated each of the RDS credit agreement and the ASG credit agreement in their entirety.  The SIC Credit Facility will be used by the Company, including both RDS and ASG, for operational purposes.  Pursuant to the SIC Credit Facility, the Company has a borrowing-base-governed revolving credit facility that provides for borrowings in an initial amount up to an aggregate of $90 million, which was increased to $100 million through the amendment entered into on August 19, 2019.

16

Under the terms of the SIC Credit Facility, the Company has the ability to request the issuance of letters of credit up to a maximum aggregate stated amount of $15 million. The ability to borrow revolving loans under the SIC Credit Facility is reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis by the aggregate stated amount of all outstanding letters of credit. The indebtedness outstanding under the SIC Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.

The revolving loans under the SIC Credit Facility bear interest at a floating rate, which the Company can elect between a LIBOR based rate plus an applicable margin varying from one hundred twenty five basis points (1.25%) to one hundred seventy five basis points (1.75%) based on the borrowers’ average daily availability determined quarterly, or a base rate (determined as the greatest of the Prime rate, the Federal Funds rate plus a fifty basis point (0.50%) margin, or the LIBOR rate with a 30 day interest period plus a two hundred basis point (2.00%) margin) plus an applicable margin varying from twenty five basis points (0.25%) to seventy five basis points (0.75%) based on the borrowers’ average daily availability determined quarterly.  Upon the occurrence of certain events of default under the SIC Credit Facility, the interest rate applicable to the obligations thereunder may be increased by two hundred basis points (2.00%).  All revolving loans under the SIC Credit Facility are due and payable in full on June 28, 2023, subject to earlier acceleration upon certain conditions.  Letter of credit obligations under the SIC Credit Facility are due and payable on the date set forth in the respective loan documents or upon demand by the lender.

Under the SIC Credit Facility, the Company and its subsidiaries are required to comply with certain customary restrictive covenants that, among other things and with certain exceptions, limit the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries, as applicable, to (i) incur additional indebtedness and liens in connection therewith, (ii) pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments, (iii) effect mergers or consolidations, (iv) enter into transactions with affiliates, (v) sell or dispose of property or assets, and (vi) engage in unrelated lines of business.  

As of September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, $9.9 million and $22.2 million, respectively, were outstanding under the SIC Credit Facility. The Company also has $0.6 million in letters of credit outstanding at September 30, 2020.  The SIC Credit Facility is subject to certain financial covenants. At September 30, 2020, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants.

The Company incurred debt issuance costs of $0.5 million in connection with the SIC Credit Facility. These costs are amortized to non-cash interest expense over the term of the agreement on a straight-line basis which approximates the effective interest method. Non-cash interest expense related to these costs were less than $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019. At September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, SIC had $0.3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the SIC Credit Facility. These costs are shown as a direct deduction of the line of credit liability in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

RDS Equipment and Vehicle Notes

RDS has financed the acquisition of certain vehicles, property, and equipment with notes payable that mature at various times through May 2024. As of September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, the outstanding balance on equipment and vehicle notes payable totaled $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively. These notes are secured by the vehicles and equipment that were financed and require monthly interest and principal payments.

17

ASG Term Loans

In December 2015, ASG entered into a loan agreement providing a term loan in the aggregate amount of $1.7 million to finance the purchase of equipment. Amounts due under the term loan bear interest at 3.75% per annum with interest payable monthly. Principal payments are due in monthly installments beginning April 8, 2016 through maturity (March 8, 2021). At September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, ASG had $0.1 million and $0.4 million outstanding under this term loan, respectively.

On February 28, 2017, AG&M and Pental, as the borrowers, entered into a financing agreement, as amended, with third party lenders (the “Term Loan Facility”), which initially provided for a $105.0 million term loan facility. The Term Loan Facility was amended in June 2018 to define the borrowers as Select Interior Concepts, Inc. and its subsidiaries, was further amended in August 2018 to adjust the borrowing capacity to $101.4 million and was further amended in December 2018 to increase the borrowing capacity to $174.2 million.  On February 7, 2020, the Term Loan Facility was amended to revise certain leverage ratio covenant requirements.  The required leverage ratio measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter ending on March 31, 2020 and each fiscal quarter thereafter to (and including) the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2020 was increased to 3.90:1.00, after which it reduces to 3.75:1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2021 and each fiscal quarter ending thereafter.

On April 8, 2020, the Term Loan Facility was further amended, which amendment, among other things, (i) waived the requirement that the Company prepay the Term Loans with Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Term Loan Facility) then due for payment in respect of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019, (ii) amended the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Term Loan Facility) covenant applicable to the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020 to be tested on a monthly basis and requires the Company and its subsidiaries to maintain a reduced Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Term Loan Facility) of not less than 1.00:1.00 for each month during such fiscal year, and (iii) does not require the Company to test the Total Leverage (as defined in the Term Loan Facility) covenant effective as of the execution date of April 8, 2020 through and including December 31, 2020 for any fiscal quarter end during such period, for so long as the Company and its subsidiaries maintain Financial Covenant Availability (as defined in the Term Loan Facility) of not less than $35 million at all times during such fiscal quarter.  

Borrowings under the Term Loan Facility bear interest per year equal to either: (i) the base rate plus 4.75% for a base rate loan, or (ii) the LIBOR rate plus 6.75% for a LIBOR loan in the event the leverage ratio is greater than 2.40:1.00.  In the event the leverage ratio is less than 2.40:1.00, the rates decrease to either (i) the base rate plus 4.25% for a base rate loan or (ii) the LIBOR rate plus 6.25% for a LIBOR loan. The base rate is the greater of (i) the publicly announced interest rate by the reference bank as its reference rate, the base commercial lending rate or prime rate, and (ii) 3.5% per annum. The interest rate assessed as of September 30, 2020 was 7.5%.  Interest is payable monthly with principal payments due in quarterly installments beginning July 1, 2017 through maturity (February 28, 2023). The Company borrowed an additional $11.5 million under the Term Loan Facility to fund the acquisition of Intown on March 1, 2019. As of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company had $153.0 million and $153.8 million outstanding, respectively, under the Term Loan Facility.  

Substantially all of the Company’s assets, including accounts receivable and inventory, are collateral for the Term Loan Facility, except assets identified as collateral for the SIC Credit Facility which hold a senior position. The Company is also restricted from paying dividends to its stockholders. Additionally, substantially all of the Company’s subsidiaries are restricted by the Term Loan Facility from providing loans, advances and dividends to the SIC parent company. The Company is required to meet certain covenants pursuant to these term loans. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

The Company incurred debt issuance costs in connection with its term loans. These costs are being amortized to non-cash interest expense over the terms of the related notes on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest rate method. Non-cash interest expense related to these costs was $0.3 million and $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020.  Non-cash interest expense related to these costs was $0.1 million and $0.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. At September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the unamortized debt issuance costs related to the term loans totaled $3.1 million and $1.6 million, respectively, and are shown as a direct deduction from the liability on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company leases certain vehicles under leases classified as capital leases. The leased vehicles are included as property and equipment (“PP&E”) and amortized to accumulated amortization on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease, which is typically four years. The total acquisition cost included in PP&E related to the leased vehicles was $11.8 million and $11.2 million at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. Total accumulated amortization related to the leased vehicles is $3.0 million and $1.6 million at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. Amortization expense was $0.5 million and $1.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020. Amortization expense was $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. Included in the capital lease balances is approximately $3.1 million of assets that were sold and subsequently leased back during 2019 and in the first quarter of 2020 related to certain ERP software and equipment.  The transaction did not qualify for sale-leaseback accounting and no sale was recognized.  Proceeds received in the first quarter of 2020 from the transaction were reported as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

18

RDS leases its corporate, administrative, fabrication and warehousing facilities under long-term non-cancelable operating lease agreements expiring at various dates through January 2025. The monthly rents are subject to annual increases and generally require the payment of utilities, real estate taxes, insurance and repairs. Three of RDS’ facility leases are with a company owned by a Company stockholder and five other facilities are leased from current employees, contractors or former owners of acquired businesses.  

RDS also leases certain office equipment under long-term non-cancellable operating lease agreements expiring at various dates through September 2022.

ASG leases its facilities and equipment under long-term non-cancellable operating lease agreements expiring at various dates through December 2029. The facility leases contain predetermined fixed escalations of the minimum rentals. One of ASG’s facility leases is with a related party.

SIC leases its corporate facilities under a long-term non-cancelable operating lease through October 2022.

The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis and records the difference between the recognized rent expense and amounts payable under the lease as deferred rent. Aggregate deferred rent at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 was $2.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively. Aggregate rent expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 totaled $4.6 million and $15.0 million, respectively. Aggregate rent expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 totaled $4.9 million and $14.3 million, respectively.  

Litigation

The Company experiences routine litigation in the normal course of its business. Production residential builders in California are primarily sued for alleged construction defects. As a practice, residential builders name all subcontractors in the lawsuit whether or not the subcontractor has any connection, direct or indirect, with the alleged defect. The Company, as a subcontractor, is involved in these lawsuits as a result. The Company generally has no or minimal liability in the majority of these lawsuits. The Company’s insurance policies’ self-insured retention (“SIR”) or/deductible typically ranges from $0.01 million to $0.02 million. In the event that the Company has exposure beyond its SIR/deductible, the Company’s general liability policy is triggered in most circumstances and the general liability insurance and the insurance carrier defends the Company in the lawsuit and is responsible for additional exposure up to policy limits. The Company has consistently maintained general liability insurance with $2.0 million aggregate and $1.0 million per occurrence limits. Management does not believe that any pending or threatened litigation will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s combined business, financial condition, results of operations, and/or cash flows.

Indemnification

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into contracts and agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties and provide for general indemnifications, including to lessors of office and warehouse space for certain actions arising during the Company’s tenancy and to the Company’s customers. The Company’s exposure under these agreements is unknown because it involves claims that may be made against the Company in the future but have not yet been made. To date, the Company has not paid any claims or been required to defend any action related to its indemnification obligations. However, the Company may record charges in the future as a result of these indemnification obligations.

Exclusive Distributor Rights

A main quartz supplier of ASG’s Pental business has granted ASG exclusive distribution rights in 23 states in the United States. To maintain these rights, ASG must meet certain minimum purchase requirements. For the remainder of 2020, ASG is required to purchase 540 containers during the three months ended December 31, 2020. Minimum purchase volumes then increase to 645 containers per quarter during 2021 up to 1,332 containers per quarter during 2025.  

19

Using an estimated price per container based on the average price per container in 2019, the future minimum purchases to maintain the exclusive rights as of September 30, 2020 are as follows:

If ASG does not purchase at least eighty percent (80%) of the minimum purchase volumes for two consecutive quarters, or at least ninety percent (90%) of the minimum purchase volumes in any calendar year, the supplier has the right to terminate ASG’s exclusive distribution rights. There are no financial penalties to ASG if such commitments are not met; however, the supplier reserves the right to terminate the exclusive distribution rights.  For the three quarters ended September 30, 2020, ASG did not meet the eighty percent (80%) minimum purchase volume threshold in light of the current economic environment.  ASG and the supplier have discussed the impact of the current economic environment on the minimum purchase volumes and have reached an informal understanding around reduced purchase volumes.  The supplier must give 60 days notice to terminate this exclusivity arrangement, which has not been received by the Company. While ASG maintains good relationships with this supplier and believes that it would be unlikely that such supplier would terminate the exclusive relationship, there is no guarantee that such supplier will not terminate the exclusive relationship in the future due to ASG’s failure to purchase the minimum volumes.  In the event the supplier were to terminate ASG’s distribution rights it could have a material impact on ASG’s supply chain and ASG may be unable to find an alternative source for quartz in a timely manner or on favorable terms.  

Purchase Commitments

The Company also has contracted to minimum purchase commitments with certain suppliers. RDS has committed to purchase $2.0 million in products annually for each of the calendar years 2020 and 2021 with a certain supplier.  The minimum purchase commitment for the year 2020 was achieved during the nine months ended September 30, 2020. Financial penalties for not achieving the minimum purchase commitment amount are equal to 15% of the shortfall amount.

In addition, ASG has committed to purchase approximately $0.4 million, based on current prices, worth of materials from a supplier by the end of 2020.

Note 12. Stock Compensation

On November 22, 2017, the Company adopted the Select Interior Concepts, Inc. 2017 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2017 Plan”). Upon the adoption of the 2017 Plan, the maximum aggregate number of shares issuable thereunder was 2,561,463 shares.  As of September 30, 2020, there were 1,437,332 shares of the Company’s common stock subject to outstanding awards and 384,371 shares of the Company’s common stock were reserved and available for future awards under the 2017 Plan.

On March 26, 2019, the board of directors adopted the Select Interior Concepts, Inc. 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2019 Incentive Plan”), which was approved at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 15, 2019. The 2019 Incentive Plan serves as the successor to the 2017 Plan; however, shares continued to be available for award grants under the 2017 Plan following the effectiveness of the 2019 Incentive Plan. The maximum aggregate number of shares issuable under the 2019 Incentive Plan is 1,700,000. No awards were issued under the 2019 Incentive Plan as of September 30, 2020.   

The 2017 Plan and the 2019 Incentive Plan (collectively, “the Plans”), permit the grant of incentive stock options to employees and the grant of nonstatutory stock options, performance awards, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, and other stock-based awards to the Company’s employees, directors and consultants at the sole discretion of the Company’s Compensation Committee of the board of directors.

Stock Options

The Company has not granted any stock options under the Plans.

20

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock awards and restricted stock unit awards are grants of shares of the Company’s common stock or rights to receive shares of the Company’s common stock that are subject to various restrictions, including restrictions on transferability, vesting and forfeiture provisions. Recipients of restricted stock awards generally will have voting and dividend rights with respect to such shares prior to vesting, subject to such awards’ forfeiture provisions, unless the board of directors provides otherwise. Recipients of restricted stock unit awards generally will not have voting and dividend rights unless and until shares of common stock are issued with respect to such awards. Shares of restricted stock that do not vest for any reason will be forfeited by the recipient and will revert to the Company.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, 2,538,219 restricted stock units were granted under the 2017 Plan to certain executives and key employees. Certain of these restricted stock units included a market condition under ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation.”

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, restricted stock units were granted to certain executives and include both a service and a performance condition. The performance condition is achievement of a 2021 earnings target and the level of achievement of the earnings target determines the number of shares that will be issued.  In the first quarter of 2020, the performance condition for these shares that was deemed probable of vesting as of December 31, 2019, was determined to be no longer probable of vesting.  This resulted in a reversal of stock compensation expense of approximately $1.6 million recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2020.  In the third quarter of 2020, the majority of these performance awards were cancelled.  These cancelled shares are included within forfeited awards in the table below.  The remaining amount of shares to be potentially issued at 100% of the earnings target is 76,319 and 152,638 at 200% of the earnings target.  

In connection with the appointment of L. W. Varner, Jr. as the new Chief Executive Officer of the Company in June 2020, Mr. Varner received a one-time grant of 500,000 time-based restricted stock units and 500,000 performance-based restricted stock units.   Additionally, the Company appointed a new President of ASG and a new Chief Human Resources Officer in the third quarter of 2020 who each received one-time grants totaling a combined 175,000 time-based restricted stock units and 175,000 performance-based restricted stock units.  All of these restricted stock units were granted to these new executives as inducement awards in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635(c)(4) and were not granted under the Plans.  The time-based restricted stock units vest in equal annual installments over four years, subject to continued employment with the Company.  The performance-based restricted stock units contain market conditions based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeding specific price hurdles for 20 consecutive trading days, and subject to continued employment with the Company.  

The Company estimated the fair value of all shares granted on the date the shares were granted and recognizes the resulting fair value over the requisite service period. The grant date fair value for the restricted stock units issued during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 was determined using the closing share price on the date of grant.  For shares issued with a market condition, the Monte Carlo simulation model was used to determine the fair value of the award.  Inputs into the Monte Carlo simulation model for applicable awards during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 included a dividend yield of 0%, an expected volatility rate ranging from 48.06% to 54.69%, and a risk-free rate ranging from 0.18% to 0.37%.

A summary of the Company’s restricted stock activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 is as follows:

As of September 30, 2020, total remaining stock-based compensation expense for nonvested restricted stock units is $11.2 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of 2.9 years.

Total stock-based compensation expense recognized for restricted stock units for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 was $1.1 million and $1.7 million, respectively.  Total stock-based compensation expense recognized for restricted stock units for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 was $1.5 million and $3.5 million, respectively.

21

Phantom Stock

Phantom stock awards are grants of phantom stock with respect to shares of the Company’s common stock that are settled in cash and subject to various restrictions, including restrictions on transferability, vesting and forfeiture provisions. Shares of phantom stock that do not vest for any reason will be forfeited by the recipient and will revert to the Company. Remaining shares of phantom stock outstanding at September 30, 2020 are held by a member of the board of directors and are subject to vesting over a period of three years. As a result of the cash-settlement feature of these awards, the Company considers these awards to be liability awards, which are measured at fair value at each reporting date and the pro-rata vested portion of the award is recognized as a liability. The fair value as of September 30, 2020 for the phantom stock awards was estimated using the closing price of common stock on September 30, 2020.

The Company recorded phantom stock-based compensation expense of less than $0.01 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019. There were 694 outstanding phantom shares as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

As of September 30, 2020, total remaining stock-based compensation expense for phantom stock is less than $0.01 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of 0.2 years.

Note 13. Provision for Income Taxes

The Company determines its periodic income tax benefit or expense based upon the current period income and the annual estimated tax rate for the Company adjusted for discrete items. The estimated tax rate is revised, if necessary, as of the end of each successive interim period during the fiscal year to the Company’s current annual estimated tax rate.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the effective tax rate of 31.41% decreased compared to the effective tax rate of 35.42% for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, due to the impact of discrete items in relation to the amount of the Company’s pre-tax earnings. The discrete items include unfavorable adjustments resulting from ASU 2016-09, which requires excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to stock compensation to be recognized as a component of income tax expense rather than stockholders’ equity, in addition to unrecognized tax benefits related to the TAC acquisition.  

In response to the global impacts of COVID-19 on U.S. companies and citizens, the federal government enacted the CARES Act on March 27, 2020.  The CARES Act included several temporary tax relief provisions for companies, including modifications to the interest deduction limitation and a five-year net operating loss carryback.  In response to these tax relief provisions, the Company has adjusted its deferred tax asset related to the interest limitation and anticipates carrying back any net operating loss generated in 2020 to prior tax periods.

Note 14. Related Party Transactions

Facility Rent

RDS leases three of its facilities from a trust affiliated with a Company stockholder. Additionally, as a result of recent acquisitions, RDS also leases five of its facilities from current employees, contractors or former owners of acquired businesses. Rent expense under related party leases totaled $0.5 million and $1.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively. Rent expense under all of these leases totaled $0.5 million and $1.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively. No amounts were unpaid under these leases at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. See Note 11.

ASG leases office space from 521 Digiulian Boulevard, LLC, a company owned by a current employee. Rent expense under this lease was $0.03 million and $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively. Rent expense under this lease was $0.04 million and $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively. No amounts were unpaid under this lease at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. See Note 11.

Subcontractors and Supplier

Two RDS employees have family members that have an ownership interest in a flooring subcontracting company that does business with RDS. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, this company performed a total of $0.2 million and $0.6 million in subcontract work for RDS, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, this company performed a total of $0.4 million and $0.8 million in subcontract work for RDS, respectively. Amounts due and recorded as accounts payable at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 were less than $0.1 million.  

22

Design services were also provided to RDS by designers affiliated with current Greencraft employees. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company incurred less than $0.01 million costs, respectively, with this consulting firm. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, expenses incurred with this design company were $0.03 million and $0.08 million, respectively. No amounts were unpaid at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

Other Consulting Services

A consulting firm affiliated with an officer of the Company has performed various consulting services for the Company related to human resources, accounting, and project management. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company incurred $0.03 million and $0.2 million of costs, respectively, with this consulting firm. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Company incurred $0.1 million and $0.2 million of costs, respectively, with this consulting firm. No amounts were unpaid at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

Note 15. Segment Information