UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant   ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant    o

Check the appropriate box:

o    Preliminary Proxy Statement

o     Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒   Definitive Proxy Statement

o    Definitive Additional Materials

o    Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

TRONOX LIMITED
(ACN 153 348 111)
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

TRANSACTION PROPOSED—YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT

Dear Shareholder:

We cordially invite you to attend a special meeting of the shareholders of Tronox Limited, which we refer to as “Tronox,” “we,” “us” or “our,” to be held on Monday, October 2, 2017 at 9:00 a.m., U.S. Eastern Time, at the Stamford Marriott Hotel, 243 Tresser Boulevard, Stamford, CT 06901 U.S.A.

Tronox entered into a transaction agreement with The National Titanium Dioxide Company Limited (“Cristal”) and Cristal Inorganic Chemicals Netherlands Coöperatief W.A. (“Cristal Netherlands”) on February 21, 2017, under which the parties have agreed to the acquisition by Tronox of the TiO ₂ business of Cristal (primarily through the acquisition of the stock of Cristal Inorganic Chemicals Netherlands BV (“Cristal BV”)). The Tronox board of directors is proposing the transaction because it believes the acquisition will provide substantial benefits to Tronox shareholders and is in the best interests of Tronox.

If the transaction is completed, Tronox (i) will make an aggregate cash payment equal to $1,673 million, subject to certain adjustments, to Cristal and Cristal Netherlands and (ii) will issue and deliver 37,580,000 of Tronox Class A Shares to Cristal Netherlands. Neither the cash portion nor the share portion of the transaction consideration will be adjusted to reflect changes to Tronox’s share price prior to the closing of the transaction, but the cash portion is subject to certain customary adjustments, none of which is expected to be material, to reflect changes to working capital, cash on hand and certain non-current liabilities of the TiO ₂ business of Cristal. Based on the closing price of Tronox Class A ordinary shares on the New York Stock Exchange (trading symbol “TROX”) on February 17, 2017, the last trading day before public announcement of the transaction, the share portion of the transaction consideration represented approximately $542 million in value.

At the special meeting of Tronox shareholders, Tronox shareholders will be asked to vote to approve the issuance of Tronox Class A Shares to Cristal Netherlands in the transaction and the resulting acquisition of interests in such Class A Shares by Cristal Netherlands and certain other persons and entities in the transaction for the purposes of Australia’s takeover laws. The proposal requires approval by a majority of the votes cast by shareholders entitled to vote on the resolution at the special meeting (whether in person or by proxy, attorney or representative).

The Tronox board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of the proposal to be voted on by Tronox Class A Shareholders and Class B Shareholders at the special meeting, as described in the accompanying proxy statement, subject to no superior proposal emerging.

The obligations of Tronox and Cristal to complete the transaction are subject to several conditions set forth in the transaction agreement. More information about Tronox, Cristal, the special meeting and the transaction is contained in this proxy statement. We encourage you to read the entire proxy statement carefully.

Sincerely,

Peter Johnston
Chief Executive Officer

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission determined that this proxy statement is accurate or adequate. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

This proxy statement is dated August 30, 2017 and is first being mailed to the shareholders of Tronox on or about August 31, 2017.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Richard L. Muglia
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
August 30, 2017

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
SPECIAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 2 , 2017

This notice of special meeting and proxy statement is available at
www.edocumentview.com/trox
Except as stated otherwise, information on our website is not part of this proxy statement.

REFERENCES TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

This proxy statement incorporates important business and financial information about Tronox from other documents that are not included in or delivered with this proxy statement. The fact that this additional information is being incorporated by reference into this proxy statement should not necessarily be viewed as an indication that such information is material to your decision on how to vote on the proposal. This information is available to you without charge upon your request. You can obtain the documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement by requesting them in writing or by telephone from Tronox at the following addresses and telephone numbers:

Tronox Limited
263 Tresser Boulevard, Suite 1100
Stamford, CT 06901, U.S.A.
Attn: Investor Relations

or

Okapi Partners LLC
1212 Avenue of Americas
New York, NY 10036
Call Collect: +1 212 297 0720
Toll Free: +1 877 274 8654

If you would like to request any documents, please do so by September 18 , 2017 in order to receive them before the special meeting.

For more information, see the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 110 .

You should rely only on the information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement. No one has been authorized to provide you with information that is different from that contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement. This proxy statement is dated August 30, 2017. You should not assume that the information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement is accurate as of any date other than the date of the document in which the information appears. Neither the mailing of this proxy statement to Tronox shareholders nor the issuance by Tronox of Class A Shares in connection with the transaction will create any implication to the contrary.

This proxy statement does not constitute the solicitation of a proxy in any jurisdiction from any person to whom it is unlawful to make any such solicitation in such jurisdiction. Information contained in this proxy statement regarding Tronox has been provided by Tronox, and information contained in this proxy statement regarding Cristal has been provided by Cristal.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT VOTING PROCEDURES FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING

The following are brief answers to common questions that you may have regarding the transaction agreement, the transaction, the consideration to be received in the transaction and the special meeting of Tronox shareholders. The questions and answers in this section may not address all questions that might be important to you as a shareholder of Tronox Limited, which we refer to as “Tronox.” To better understand these matters, and for a description of the legal terms governing the transaction, we urge you to read carefully and in its entirety this proxy statement, including the appendices to, and the documents incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement. The fact that additional information is being incorporated by reference into this proxy statement should not necessarily be viewed as an indication that such information is material to your decision on how to vote on the proposal. See the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 110 .

Q.   Why am I receiving these proxy materials?

A.   Tronox and Cristal have agreed to a transaction under the terms of the transaction agreement that is described in this proxy statement. A copy of the transaction agreement is attached to this proxy statement as Annex A. In order to complete the transaction, Tronox shareholders must vote to approve the issuance of 37,580,000 Class A Shares to Cristal Netherlands and the resulting acquisition of interests in such Class A Shares by Cristal Netherlands and certain other persons and entities pursuant to the transaction (the “proposal”).

The board of directors of Tronox is providing these proxy materials to you in connection with the special meeting, which will take place on Monday, October 2, 2017, to obtain this approval. This proxy statement, together with its appendices, contains and incorporates by reference important information about Tronox, Cristal, the transaction and the special meeting of the shareholders of Tronox, and you should read all of the available information carefully. The fact that additional information is being incorporated by reference into this proxy statement should not necessarily be viewed as an indication that such information is material to your decision on how to vote on the proposal. The enclosed proxy allows you to vote your shares without attending the special meeting of Tronox shareholders.

Your vote is important. We encourage you to vote as soon as possible.

Q.   When and where will the special meeting be held?

A.   The Tronox special meeting will be held at the Stamford Marriott Hotel, 243 Tresser Boulevard, Stamford, CT 06901 U.S.A. at 9:00 a.m., U.S. Eastern Time, on Monday, October 2, 2017.

Q.   What is the board of directors’ voting recommendation?

A.   The Tronox board of directors has unanimously approved the proposal and recommends that you vote your shares “FOR” the proposal.

Q.   What vote is needed for the proposal to be adopted?

A.   Tronox is incorporated under the laws of Australia. To adopt the proposal, the Australian Corporations Act and our constitution require that the proposal be passed as an ordinary resolution. Under our constitution and Australian law, the proposal must be approved by a majority of the votes cast by holders of Class A Shares and Class B Shares entitled to vote on the resolution at the special meeting.

Q.   Who is entitled to vote at the special meeting?

A.   Only Class A and Class B Shareholders of record at 5:00 p.m., U.S. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 28, 2017 will be entitled to attend and vote at the special meeting. As of July 28, 2017, there were 67,821,274 Class A Shares outstanding and 51,154,280 Class B Shares outstanding. Each of our Class A Shares and our Class B Shares entitles its holder to one vote on all matters on which holders of such shares have the right to vote. Shareholders do not have cumulative voting rights.

Q.   Who can attend the special meeting?

A.   Attendance at the special meeting is limited to shareholders of record at 5:00 p.m., U.S. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 28, 2017 (or their properly appointed proxies, attorneys or representatives). Guests may be admitted, but a guest has no right to speak or vote at the special meeting. Holders of record of our shares as of 5:00

p.m., U.S. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 28, 2017, can vote in person at the special meeting. If you plan to attend the special meeting, you must hold your shares in your own name or have a letter from the record holder of your shares confirming your ownership and you must bring a form of personal photo identification with you in order to be admitted. We reserve the right to refuse admittance to anyone without proper proof of share ownership or without proper photo identification. If you plan to attend, please note that you may be asked to present valid identification, as more fully set forth under the section entitled “The Special Meeting—Special Meeting Admission” beginning on page 32 .

Q.   What constitutes a quorum at the special meeting?

A.   Under our constitution, the holders of a majority of outstanding Class A Shares and Class B Shares entitled to vote at the meeting constitute a quorum for the special meeting.

Q.   How do I vote?

A.   You may vote your shares in person, by telephone, by mail, or by facsimile pursuant to the instructions included elsewhere in this proxy statement, as more fully described in the section entitled “The Special Meeting—Voting Procedures” beginning on page 30 .

Q.   How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

A.   Both abstentions and broker non-votes of shareholders whose shares are held by holders of record present or represented at the meeting are counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present. However, abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted in determining whether or not the proposal is approved. In particular, abstentions and other votes that are not cast at the meeting are not counted as votes “for” or “against” the proposal, and are not counted as votes cast. For additional information regarding abstentions and broker non-votes, see the section entitled “The Special Meeting—Quorum Requirements and Effect of Abstention and Broker Non-Votes” beginning on page 31 .

Q.   If my shares are held in street name by my broker, will my broker vote my shares for me?

A.   If you hold your shares in a stock brokerage account or if your shares are held by a bank or nominee (that is, in street name), you must provide the record holder of your shares with instructions on how to vote your shares. Please follow the voting instructions provided by your bank or broker.

Please note that you may not vote shares held in street name by returning a proxy card directly to us or by voting in person at the special meeting unless you provide a “legal proxy,” which you must obtain from your bank or broker. Under the listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, which we refer to as the NYSE, brokers who hold shares in street name for a beneficial owner of those shares typically have the authority to vote in their discretion on “routine” proposals when they have not received instructions from beneficial owners. However, brokers are not allowed to exercise their voting discretion with respect to the approval of matters that the NYSE determines to be “nonroutine,” such as approval of the issuance of shares of the Class A Shares pursuant to the transaction agreement, without specific instructions from the beneficial owner. Broker nonvotes are shares held by a broker or nominee that are represented at the shareholders’ meetings, but with respect to which the broker or nominee is not instructed by the beneficial owner of such shares to vote on the particular proposal and the broker does not have discretionary voting power on such proposal.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held by a broker and you do not instruct your broker on how to vote your shares, your broker may not vote your shares on the proposal.

Q.   Can I change my vote after I have returned a proxy or voting instruction card?

A:   Yes. You can change your vote at any time before your shares are voted at the special meeting. You can do this in one of three ways:

Note, however, that to be effective for the special meeting, a later-dated proxy must be received by Tronox no later than 11:59 p.m., U.S. Eastern Time on October 1, 2017, and be given in accordance with the requirements specified in the section entitled “Proxies” of the Notice of Special Meeting.

If your shares are held in street name by your bank or broker, you should follow the instructions provided by your bank or broker to change your vote.

Q.   What is the cost of the proxy solicitation?

A.   Tronox bears all of the cost of the solicitation of proxies, including the preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of all proxy materials sent by it. Tronox also reimburses banks, brokers, custodians and other record holders for their costs in forwarding the proxy materials to the beneficial owners or holders of Tronox shares. Tronox and its directors, officers and executive employees also may solicit proxies by mail, personally, by telephone or by other appropriate means. No additional compensation will be paid to directors, officers or other executive employees for such services. In addition, we have retained Okapi Partners LLC, which we refer to as Okapi, to aid in the solicitation of proxies by mail, personally, by telephone, e-mail or other appropriate means. For these services, we will pay Okapi $15,000 plus certain variable fees related to calling services plus other reasonable out-of-pocket expense reimbursement.

Q.   Who can help answer my questions?

A.   Tronox shareholders who have questions about the transaction, the Class A Share issuance or the other matters to be voted on at the special meeting or who desire additional copies of this document or additional proxy cards should contact: Okapi Partners LLC, 1212 Avenue of Americas, New York, NY 10036.

SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement and may not contain all the information that is important to you. Accordingly, we urge you to read this proxy statement carefully and in its entirety, including the appendices attached to, and the other documents incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement, including exhibits thereto. The fact that additional information is being incorporated by reference into this proxy statement should not necessarily be viewed as an indication that such information is material to your decision on how to vote on the proposal. The page references have been included in this summary to direct you to a more complete description of the topics presented below. See also the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 110 .

References to “Tronox,” “we,” or “our” or other first person references are references to Tronox Limited. References to “Cristal” are references to The National Titanium Dioxide Company Limited. References to “Cristal Netherlands” are references to Cristal Inorganic Chemicals Netherlands Coöperatief W.A. References to “Cristal BV” are references to Cristal Inorganic Chemicals Netherlands BV. References to the “combined company” are references to Tronox after the completion of the transaction. References to “shares” are references to the ordinary shares of Tronox, including Class A ordinary shares, which we refer to as the “Class A Shares,” and Class B ordinary shares, which we refer to as the “Class B Shares.” References to “Class A Shareholders” are references to holders of Class A Shares, and references to “Class B Shareholders” refers to holders of Class B Shares. References to the “transaction,” unless the context requires otherwise, means the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreement, taken as a whole. References to the “special meeting,” unless the context requires otherwise, means the special meeting of Tronox shareholders to be held on October 2 , 2017.

The Companies

Tronox (See page 28 )

Tronox Limited
Lot 22, Mason Road
Kwinana Beach, WA, Australia 6167
Telephone: +1 203 705 3722

Tronox Limited operates two vertically integrated mining and inorganic chemical businesses. Tronox TiO ₂ mines and processes titanium ore, zircon and other minerals, and manufactures titanium dioxide pigments that add brightness and durability to paints, plastics, paper, and other everyday products. Tronox Alkali mines trona ore and manufactures natural soda ash, sodium bicarbonate, caustic soda, and other compounds which are used in the production of glass, detergents, baked goods, animal nutrition supplements, pharmaceuticals, and other essential products. Tronox is a public limited company registered under the laws of the State of Western Australia, Australia, and is headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut. Tronox’s Class A Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TROX”.

Cristal (See page 28 )

The National Titanium Dioxide Company Limited
King’s Road Tower, 17th Floor, King Abdulaziz Road
P.O. Box 13586, Jeddah 21414, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Telephone: +066 12 224 8000

Cristal operates a vertically integrated mining and inorganic chemical business. Cristal mines and processes titanium ore, zircon and other minerals, and manufactures titanium dioxide pigments that add brightness and durability to paints, plastics, paper, and other everyday products. Cristal’s TiO ₂ operations include manufacturing facilities, mining operations and research facilities in seven countries over five continents, including North America, South America, Australia, Europe and Asia. Cristal is a privately-held company registered under the laws of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and is headquartered in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

The Transaction

A copy of the transaction agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement. We encourage you to read the entire transaction agreement carefully because it is the principal document governing the transaction. For more information on the transaction agreement, see the section entitled “The Transaction Agreement” beginning on page 52 .

Form of Transaction and Consideration to be Delivered (see page 52 )

The transaction agreement provides that, subject to the terms and conditions of the transaction agreement, at the closing of the transaction and following an internal reorganization of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business under which the assets and operations relating to the TiO ₂ business of Cristal will be reorganized under one or more entities owned by Cristal BV, Tronox will acquire the TiO ₂ business of Cristal through (i) the purchase from Cristal of certain intangible assets and a Saudi Arabian entity formed to hold certain assets in connection with the reorganization, and (ii) the purchase from Cristal Netherlands of all of the outstanding equity of Cristal BV. Although the TiO ₂ business represents substantially all of Cristal’s operations, Tronox will not acquire as part of the transaction Cristal’s 50% interest in Advanced Metal Industries Cluster Company Limited (“AMIC”), a Saudi Arabian entity, which we refer to as the “Retained Cristal Business.” AMIC is currently in the construction phase of two significant projects: (i) an ilmenite slag smelting plant, located in Jizan, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which is designed to produce high grade titanium feedstock, and (ii) a titanium sponge plant, located adjacent to the Cristal Yanbu TiO ₂ plant, which is being developed in a joint venture with Toho Titanium Company (“Toho”).

At the closing of the transaction, Tronox (i) will make an aggregate cash payment equal to $1,673 million, subject to certain adjustments, to Cristal and Cristal Netherlands, and (ii) will issue and deliver to Cristal Netherlands 37,580,000 Class A Shares. Upon the completion of the transaction and the issuance of the Class A Shares, based on the number of shares then outstanding, Tronox shareholders prior to the transaction will own approximately 76% of Tronox’s outstanding Class A Shares and Class B Shares and Cristal Netherlands will own approximately 24% of Tronox’s outstanding Class A Shares and Class B Shares.

Recommendations of the Tronox Board of Directors (see page 38 )

After careful consideration, our board of directors unanimously approved the transaction agreement. For the factors considered by the Tronox board of directors in reaching its decision to approve the transaction agreement, see the section entitled “The Transaction—Reasons for the Transaction; Recommendation of the Tronox Board of Directors to Approve the Issuance of Class A Shares in the Transaction” beginning on page 38 . The Tronox board of directors unanimously recommends that the Tronox shareholders vote “FOR” the proposal, subject to no superior proposal emerging.

Opinion of Tronox’s Financial Advisor (see page 40 )

In connection with the transaction, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, which we refer to as “Credit Suisse,” which is serving as financial advisor to Tronox, delivered an opinion, dated February 20, 2017, to the Tronox board of directors as to the fairness, from a financial point of view and as of the date of such opinion, to Tronox of the consideration to be paid by Tronox pursuant to the transaction agreement. The full text of Credit Suisse’s written opinion, dated February 20, 2017, is attached to this proxy statement as Annex C and sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken by Credit Suisse in connection with such opinion. The description of Credit Suisse’s opinion set forth in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Credit Suisse’s opinion. Credit Suisse’s opinion was provided to the Tronox board of directors (in its capacity as such) for its information in connection with its evaluation of the consideration to be paid by Tronox pursuant to the transaction agreement from a financial point of view to Tronox and did not address any other aspect of the transaction, including the relative merits of the transaction as compared to alternative transactions or strategies that might be available to Tronox or the underlying business decision of Tronox to proceed with the transaction. Credit Suisse’s opinion does not constitute advice or a recommendation to any shareholder as to how such shareholder should vote or act on any matter relating to the transaction or otherwise.

Interests of Directors and Officers in the Transaction (see page 47 )

Tronox’s executive officers and directors may have financial interests in the transaction that are different from, or in addition to, those of Tronox’s shareholders generally. The independent members of the Tronox board of directors

were aware of and considered these interests, among other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the transaction agreement and the transaction, and in recommending to the shareholders that the proposal be approved.

In connection with the transaction, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee (the “committee”) of the Tronox board of directors created an Integration Incentive Award program which is expected to cover approximately thirty employees who will be designated in advance with specific integration tasks. As part of this program, the committee approved certain grants pursuant to Tronox’s Management Equity Incentive Plan in order to incentivize six executive employees to achieve synergies following the transaction, and to further align the compensation of these employees to the value created for Tronox’s shareholders in the transaction. Pursuant to the awards program, six executive employees were granted performance-based restricted share units (“award RSUs”) using a share price of $18.675 per share, which was the average of the opening and closing trading prices for Class A Shares on February 21, 2017. The award RSUs are subject to vesting terms based upon the achievement of at least 80% of the publicly announced synergies from the transaction by the date that is two years following the closing of the transaction (the “vesting date”). The award RSUs will vest as follows: upon the achievement of at least 80% of the publicly announced synergies from the transaction by the vesting date, 50% of the award RSUs granted will vest, with pro rata additional vesting up to 100% upon the achievement of 100% of the publicly announced synergies from the transaction by the vesting date. In the event 100% of the publicly announced synergies from the transaction are achieved within the two-year period, the RSUs granted to the six executive employees would have an aggregate value of $13.5 million based on the grant price of $18.675. If the transaction is not closed by July 1, 2018, then the award RSUs granted will be forfeited.

Please see the section entitled “The Transaction—Interests of Directors and Officers in the Transaction” beginning on page 47 for additional information about those financial interests.

Board of Directors Following the Transaction (see page 48 )

In connection with the closing of the transaction, Tronox will enter into a shareholders agreement with Cristal, Cristal Netherlands and the underlying shareholders of Cristal, which we refer to collectively as the “Cristal shareholder parties” and which are more fully described in the section entitled “Additional Information Relating to Australia’s Takeover Laws—Impact of the Transaction on Cristal Shareholder Parties’ Voting Power” beginning on page 72 . As required by the terms of the transaction agreement, upon consummation of the transaction, Tronox will appoint two “Class A Directors” (as defined in Tronox’s constitution) designated by Cristal. The Cristal nominees will be determined prior to the closing of the transaction. For so long as the Cristal shareholder parties beneficially own 28,185,000 or more voting securities of Tronox, the Cristal shareholder parties have the right to nominate two Class A Directors, and for so long as the Cristal shareholder parties beneficially own greater than or equal to 15,568,333 but less than 28,185,000 voting securities of Tronox, the Cristal shareholder parties will have the right to nominate one Class A Director. The Tronox board of directors will remain its current size following the closing of the transaction; therefore, two of Tronox’s Class A Directors at the time of the closing of the transaction will be designated to resign from the Tronox board of directors prior to the closing of the transaction. Exxaro Resources Limited (“Exxaro”) will retain its right to nominate members of the Tronox board of directors in accordance with its rights under Tronox’s constitution and Tronox’s shareholders deed.

Please see the sections entitled “The Transaction—Board of Directors and Management Following the Transaction” beginning on page 48 and “The Shareholders Agreement—Board Representation” beginning on page 66 for additional information.

Regulatory Approvals Required for the Transaction (see page 48 )

Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, (the “HSR Act”), Tronox and Cristal must file notifications with the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) and the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (the “Antitrust Division”) and the parties must observe a mandatory pre-transaction waiting period before consummating the transaction. The parties filed the required HSR Act notification and report form on March 14, 2017. The parties also intend to file notifications with the Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia in accordance with the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (the “FATA”) and have approached the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission seeking informal clearance in relation to the transaction. The parties have also filed various notifications with other antitrust authorities around the world.

Please see the section entitled “The Transaction—Regulatory Approvals Required for the Transaction” beginning on page 48 for additional information with regard to the required regulatory filings and approvals.

Expected Timing of the Transaction

The parties expect that the conditions to the transaction will be satisfied or, if allowed by applicable law, waived, and that the transaction will be completed by the end of first quarter 2018. However, the parties cannot be certain when, or if, the conditions to the transaction will be satisfied or so waived, or that the transaction will be completed.

Conditions to Completion of the Transaction (see page 61 )

Conditions to Each Party’s Obligations. The respective obligations of each of Tronox and Cristal to consummate the closing are subject to the satisfaction or waiver at or prior to the closing of the following conditions:

Conditions to Obligations of Cristal . The obligations of Cristal to consummate the closing are further subject to the following conditions:

Conditions to Obligations of Tronox. The obligations of Tronox to consummate the closing are further subject to the following conditions:

Financing of the Transaction (see page 61 )

Tronox has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain a commitment letter providing for debt financing sufficient, together with all available cash and other proceeds, to fund the cash consideration at the closing of the transaction. On August 2, 2017, Tronox announced its intention to refinance a portion of its capital structure by mid-October 2017 and also its entry into a stock purchase agreement with Genesis Energy, L.P. providing for the sale of the Alkali business for $1.325 billion in cash. The majority of the cash portion of the Cristal transaction consideration is expected to be funded through proceeds from the closing of the sale of Tronox’s Alkali business, with the remainder funded through proceeds from additional indebtedness and/or cash on hand, as determined by Tronox as circumstances warrant. To the extent permitted by law, at the closing of the transaction, Tronox, Cristal BV and certain of the transferred Cristal entities may execute supplemental indentures and/or joinders to certain documents governing the indebtedness of Tronox at such time. The closing of the transaction is not, however, conditioned upon the pending sale of the Alkali business.

Survival; Indemnification (see page 62 )

The transaction agreement provides for indemnification obligations that continue for a period of 18 months after the closing of the transaction (or, if a claim is asserted prior to such time, until its resolution), except that any covenants to be performed after the closing of the transaction shall survive indefinitely, and all fundamental representations will survive six years after the closing of the transaction. The transaction agreement further provides that neither party shall be entitled to indemnification in excess of $2.1 billion in the aggregate (together, with respect to Tronox, with any amounts collected under a representations and warranties insurance policy purchased by Cristal for the benefit of Tronox). Among other things, Tronox is entitled to indemnification for the failure of any of the representations or warranties made by Cristal under the transaction agreement or Cristal’s closing certificate to be true and correct as of closing of the transaction and for any breach of a covenant or agreement to be performed by Cristal under the transaction agreement. Among other things, Cristal is entitled to indemnification for the failure of any of the representations or warranties made by Tronox under the transaction agreement or Tronox’s closing certificate to be true and correct as of closing and for any breach of a covenant or agreement to be performed by Tronox under the transaction agreement.

Any indemnification of the Tronox indemnified parties is to be satisfied first by Cristal or Cristal Netherlands up to the retention amount under the representations and warranties insurance policy; second, from the representation and warranties insurance policy to the extent coverage is available; and third, by Cristal or Cristal Netherlands. For 18 months after the closing of the transaction, at Tronox’s election, the share portion of the transaction consideration may also be used to satisfy the indemnification of the Tronox indemnified parties if payment is not made within 10 business days after the resolution of a claim.

No Solicitations of Alternative Transactions by Cristal (see page 57 )

The transaction agreement precludes Cristal from soliciting or engaging in discussions or negotiations with a third party with respect to a proposal for an alternative transaction, including the acquisition of a significant interest in Cristal’s equity or assets.

Termination of the Transaction Agreement (see page 63 )

The transaction agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the closing of the transaction, whether or not the required Tronox shareholder approvals have been obtained, under the following circumstances:

Termination Fees and Expenses (see page 64 )

In the event that the transaction agreement is terminated by Cristal or Tronox because the closing of the transaction has not occurred by May 21, 2018, and all conditions to closing, other than the financing condition, have been satisfied, Tronox will promptly pay a nonrefundable fee of $100 million to Cristal; provided that Cristal is not in material breach of any of its covenants or agreements contained in the transaction agreement at such time.

In the event that the transaction agreement is terminated by Cristal or Tronox because the closing of the transaction has not occurred by May 21, 2018 or Tronox fails to obtain the required Tronox shareholder approvals at the Tronox special meeting, then Tronox will reimburse Cristal for certain expenses incurred by or on behalf of Cristal in connection with the transaction agreement, any ancillary agreements, all related agreements and documents, the due diligence investigation and the transactions contemplated thereunder not to exceed $15 million in the aggregate.

Accounting Treatment (see page 50 )

Tronox prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). Under U.S. GAAP, the transaction will be accounted for using acquisition accounting pursuant to which Tronox has been determined to be the acquirer for accounting purposes. Tronox considered factors as indicated in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805 “ Business Combinations ” (“ASC 805”), including which entity will issue equity interest to effect the combination, board of director composition, shareholder ownership, restrictions on shareholder voting rights, anticipated management positions and the relative size of the companies.

Shareholders Agreement (see page 66 )

Upon consummation of the transaction, Tronox and the Cristal shareholder parties will enter into the shareholders agreement in the form attached to the transaction agreement. The form of shareholders agreement provides that the Cristal shareholder parties will have the following nomination rights to the Tronox board of directors upon completion of the transaction:

Tronox will include the Cristal shareholder parties’ nominees in the slate of nominees recommended by the Tronox board of directors for election of directors and will use its reasonable best efforts to cause the shareholders of Tronox to elect the Cristal shareholder parties nominees. The form of shareholders agreement contains certain

restrictions on Cristal and its shareholders from acquiring additional shares of Tronox stock and taking certain other actions to seek to gain control of Tronox without our prior written consent, from the date of the shareholders agreement until the earlier of (i) six months after the Cristal shareholder parties no longer have any rights to nominate Class A Directors and (ii) the third anniversary of the date of the shareholders agreement.

In addition, the shareholders agreement will grant registration rights to Cristal and any other Cristal shareholder parties to which Cristal transfers Class A Shares in accordance with the terms of the shareholders agreement and places restrictions on the ability of such persons to transfer the Class A Shares that they will receive in the transaction for three years following the closing of the transaction (among other transfer restrictions).

For two years following the closing of the transaction, certain shareholders of Cristal are also subject to limitations on their ability to compete with the business activities conducted by Tronox and, subject to certain exceptions, are prohibited from soliciting for hire, and hiring, certain persons who are employees of Tronox.

The Special Meeting

The Tronox special meeting will be held at the Stamford Marriott Hotel, 243 Tresser Boulevard, Stamford, CT 06901 U.S.A. at 9:00 a.m., U.S. Eastern Time, on Monday, October 2, 2017. At the Tronox special meeting, Tronox shareholders will be asked to approve the issuance of Class A Shares to Cristal Netherlands and the resulting acquisition of interests in the Class A Shares by Cristal Netherlands and certain other persons and entities pursuant to the transaction.

You may vote at the Tronox special meeting if you own Class A Shares or Class B Shares at 5:00 p.m., U.S. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 28, 2017. On July 28, 2017, there were 67,821,274 Class A Shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the Tronox special meeting, approximately 1.9% of which were owned and entitled to be voted by Tronox directors and executive officers and their affiliates. On that date there were 51,154,280 Class B Shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the Tronox special meeting, 100% of which were owned and entitled to be voted by Exxaro. In accordance with the transaction agreement, we currently expect that Tronox’s directors will vote their shares in favor of the proposal, subject to no superior proposal emerging, although none of them has entered into any agreement obligating them to do so.

You can cast one vote for each Class A Share or Class B Share you own. To be adopted, the resolution in favor of the proposal must be approved by a majority of the votes cast by holders of Class A Shares and Class B Shares entitled to vote on the resolution at the special meeting.

For the proposal to be effective under Australian law, no vote may be cast in favor of the resolution by Cristal Netherlands, any of the Cristal shareholder parties, or any of their associates. Any such vote that is so cast will be disregarded.

SELECTED HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA

Selected Consolidated Historical Financial Data of Tronox

The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data for Tronox and its consolidated subsidiaries as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. It was derived from Tronox’s consolidated historical financial statements and related notes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 appearing in Tronox’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2016, which is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. The summary unaudited consolidated financial data for Tronox as of and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was derived from Tronox’s audited consolidated financial statements not incorporated in this proxy. The table also sets forth selected unaudited condensed consolidated financial data for Tronox and its consolidated subsidiaries as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and for the six months ended June 30, 2016 which was derived from Tronox’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2017, which is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

On June 2, 2017, Tronox filed a Current Report on Form 8-K to provide additional information and details regarding the revision of its previously issued December 31, 2016 financial statements and quarterly financial statements in 2016. During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, Tronox identified a misstatement in selling, general, and administrative expense for certain prior periods related to a liability resulting from a non-timely filing with a statutory authority. The aggregate misstatement is $11 million, which impacts our previously issued consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, balance sheets and cash flows as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the third and fourth quarters and corresponding year-to-date periods of 2015, and each quarter and corresponding year-to-date periods of 2016. In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 99, Materiality , and SAB No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements , management evaluated the materiality of the misstatement from qualitative and quantitative perspectives, and concluded that the misstatement was not material to our previously issued annual and interim financial statements. In addition, we also corrected the timing of other previously recorded immaterial out-of-period adjustments. The previously recorded immaterial out-of-period adjustments include a $6 million decrease to cost of goods sold due to an overstated depreciation expense and a $7 million increase to cost of goods sold related to royalty tax both originating in 2013 and previously recorded as out-of-period corrections in 2014; a $5 million decrease to cost of goods sold that originated in 2012 and was previously recorded as an out-of-period correction in 2014 due to overstated depletion expense; and other miscellaneous immaterial corrections.

Tronox’s historical financial data may not be indicative of the results of operations or financial position to be expected in the future. The selected consolidated historical financial data below has not been adjusted to include the aforementioned revision except for the second quarter of 2016. It reflects the information from Tronox’s previously filed annual reports on Form 10-K for all of the annual periods presented.

Selected Consolidated Historical Financial Data of Cristal

The following selected historical financial information as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is derived from Cristal’s audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended 2016, 2015 and 2014 and Cristal’s unaudited consolidated financial statements for 2013 and 2012. Cristal’s audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 are included in this proxy statement. Cristal’s unaudited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are not included in this proxy statement. A reconciliation of net loss from generally accepted accounting standards in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (“Saudi GAAP”) to U.S. GAAP is presented for the two most recent years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. A reconciliation of net loss from Saudi GAAP to U.S. GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is not presented as these are not required due to the significant undertaking that would be needed to prepare this information. The following selected historical financial information should be read with Cristal’s “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on page 92 and Cristal’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, included in this proxy statement. Cristal’s historical results are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.

The following tables present summarized consolidated financial information, including balance sheet information and statement of operations information, derived from Cristal’s consolidated financial statements. The selected historical financial data of Cristal was prepared in accordance with Saudi GAAP. For the purposes of this proxy statement, the information is presented in United States Dollars (“USD”), translated using the Saudi Riyal (“SR”) to USD exchange rate of 3.75. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is included within the Gulf Cooperation Council of countries who peg their national currency to the USD to avoid currency fluctuation. The SR is pegged to the USD at an exchange rate of 3.75.

The audited consolidated financial statements of Cristal for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 with the accompanying Saudi GAAP to U.S. GAAP reconciliations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, are included in this proxy statement.

Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data of Tronox and Cristal

The selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data for the year ended December 31, 2016 and six months ended June 30, 2017 presents Tronox’s consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statements of operations, after giving effect to the transaction. The selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Tronox and Cristal for the year ended December 31, 2016 and the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Tronox and unaudited financial information of Cristal as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The selected historical financial data of Cristal is presented in USD, translated using the SR to USD exchange rate of 3.75. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is included within the Gulf Cooperation Council of countries who peg their national currency to the USD to avoid currency fluctuation. The SR is pegged to the USD at an exchange rate of 3.75.

This unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data assumes that the transaction is accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting with Tronox treated as the acquiring entity and represents a current estimate of the combined financial information based on historical financial information of Tronox and Cristal. This selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data is adjusted for the acquisition of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business as if the transaction had been completed on January 1, 2016, in the case of the selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations, and on June 30, 2017, in the case of the selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet.

On August 2, 2017, Tronox announced that it had entered into a stock purchase agreement to sell the Alkali business to Genesis Energy, L.P. for $1.325 billion in cash, subject to customary closing conditions and a working capital adjustment and, is expected to close in the second half of 2017. The pro forma data has been adjusted to reflect the acquisition of the Cristal TiO ₂ business using the cash proceeds from the sale of the Alkali business together with proceeds raised from the issuance of additional debt. The pro forma data excludes the effects of any non-recurring charges resulting from the loss on the sale of the Alkali business. Further, the acquisition of Cristal and the sale of Alkali are independent transactions from each other. The selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data for the year ended December 31, 2015 displays the pro forma results of Tronox excluding those of the Alkali business and does not include the adjustments for the acquisition of Cristal.

In addition, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data includes adjustments, which are preliminary and may be revised. There can be no assurance that such revisions will not result in material changes. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data has been presented for informational purposes only. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data is not necessarily indicative of what the combined company’s financial position or results of operations actually would have been had the transaction been completed as of the dates indicated. In addition, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information does not purport to project the future financial position or operating results of the combined company. The information presented below should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements of Tronox, including related notes, filed by Tronox with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC’), the historical consolidated financial statements of Cristal, including related notes, appearing elsewhere in this proxy statement, and with the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements of Tronox and Cristal, including the related notes, appearing elsewhere in this proxy statement. For more information, see the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 110 .

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data
of Tronox and Cristal
(Millions of U.S. Dollars)

Comparative Historical and Pro Forma Per Share Data

The following tables set forth certain historical and pro forma per share financial information for Tronox Class A Shares and Class B Shares and Cristal common stock. The pro forma per share information for the year ended December 31, 2016 and six months ended June 30, 2017 gives effect to the transaction as if the transaction had occurred on January 1, 2016.

The pro forma per share balance sheet information combines Tronox’s June 30, 2017 unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet with Cristal’s June 30, 2017 unaudited balance sheet. The pro forma per share statement of operations information for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 combines Tronox’s audited consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 with Cristal’s audited consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. The pro forma per share statement of operations information for the six months ended June 30, 2017 combines Tronox’s unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017 with Cristal’s unaudited consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The pro forma per share statement of operations information for the year ended December 31, 2015 displays the pro forma results of Tronox excluding those of the Alkali business and does not include the adjustments for the acquisition of Cristal.

The following information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of Tronox, which are incorporated by reference in this proxy statement, and Cristal, which appear elsewhere in this proxy statement, and the financial information contained in the section entitled “Selected Historical and Pro Forma Combined Financial Data” beginning on page 11 . The unaudited pro forma information below is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the future operating results or financial position that would have occurred if the transaction had been completed as of the periods presented, nor is it necessarily indicative of the future operating results or financial position of the combined company. In addition, the unaudited pro forma information does not purport to indicate balance sheet data or results of operations as of any future date or for any future period. The following tables are expressed in USD:

Comparative Per Share Market Price and Dividend Information

Market Prices

Class A Shares of Tronox are currently listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “TROX”. There is no public trading market for Class B Shares, which are held by Exxaro. Cristal is a privately held company, and there is no established trading market for its securities. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales price per share of Tronox Class A Shares as reported on the NYSE and the dividends paid out during these periods. On February 17, 2017, the last full trading day prior to the announcement of the transaction, the closing price of Class A Share on the NYSE was $14.42 per share. On August 29, 2017, the last practicable date before the printing of this proxy statement, the closing price of Class A Shares on the NYSE was $20.13 per share. Class A Shareholders should obtain current market prices for Class A Shares in deciding whether to vote for the approval of the proposal.

As of July 28, 2017, there were 67,821,274 Class A Shares and 51,154,280 Class B Shares issued and outstanding, and there were approximately 426 holders of record of Class A Shares and Exxaro was the sole holder of record of Class B Shares.

Dividends

Tronox currently pays a quarterly dividend on Class A Shares and Class B Shares and most recently declared a dividend on August 8, 2017, of $0.045 per share, payable on August 31, 2017 to the Class A Shareholders and Class B Shareholders of record at the close of business on August 21, 2017.

Pursuant to the transaction agreement, during the period prior to the closing of the transaction, Tronox is not permitted to declare, set aside or pay any dividends, or make any other distributions, other than quarterly cash dividends with a record date after December 31, 2016, in an amount less than or equal to the most-recent quarterly dividend paid by Tronox. Further, Tronox’s existing senior notes limit the payment of dividends.

Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Tronox board of directors and will be dependent upon then-existing conditions, including the financial condition and results of operations, contractual restrictions and business prospects of the combined company and other factors that the Tronox board of directors determines to consider.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This proxy statement and the documents that are incorporated into this proxy statement by reference may contain or incorporate by reference statements that do not directly or exclusively relate to historical facts. Such statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can typically identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking words, such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “predicts,” “future,” “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “potential,” “plan,” “aim,” “seek,” “forecast” and other similar words. These forward-looking statements are based upon Tronox’s current beliefs and expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events including the operations of Tronox and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Many of those factors are outside the control of Tronox, and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to:

The areas of risk and uncertainty described above should be considered in connection with any written or oral forward-looking statements that may be made after the date of this proxy statement by Tronox or anyone acting for Tronox. Except for ongoing obligations to disclose material information under U.S. federal securities laws, Tronox does not undertake any obligations to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statement, to report events or circumstances after the date of this proxy statement or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events.

For additional information about factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements, see the note regarding forward-looking statements in Tronox’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC, including Tronox’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, and incorporated by reference in this proxy statement. For more information, see the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 110 .

Tronox also cautions the reader that undue reliance should not be placed on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this proxy statement. Tronox does not undertake any duty or responsibility to update any of these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this proxy statement to reflect actual outcomes.

RISK FACTORS

In addition to general investment risks and other information contained in or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement, including the matters described in the section entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 19 and discussions under “Risk Factors” in Tronox’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as updated by other reports filed with the SEC, including Tronox’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, which are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement, you should carefully consider the following risk factors in deciding how to vote your shares. You should also consider the other documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement, as described in the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 110 . The fact that this additional information is being incorporated by reference into this proxy statement should not necessarily be viewed as an indication that such information is material to your decision on how to vote on the proposal.

Tronox may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of the transaction, including expected synergies, earnings per share accretion or EBITDA and free cash flow growth and Tronox will be subject to business uncertainties that could adversely affect its business.

The success of the transaction will depend, in part, on Tronox’s ability to realize anticipated cost synergies, earnings per share accretion or EBITDA and free cash flow growth. Our success in realizing these benefits, and the timing of this realization, depends on the successful integration of our business and operations with Cristal’s TiO ₂ business. Even if we are able to integrate Cristal’s TiO ₂ business successfully, this integration may not result in the realization of the full benefits of the transaction that we currently expect within the anticipated time frame or at all.

There is also the possibility that:

Uncertainty about the effect of the transaction on employees, customers and suppliers may have an adverse effect on Tronox’s business. These uncertainties may impair Tronox’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the transaction is consummated and for a period of time thereafter, and could cause Tronox’s customers, suppliers and other business partners to delay or defer certain business decisions or to seek to change existing business relationships with Tronox. The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, particularly during the period immediately following the closing of the Cristal transaction.

The number of Class A Shares to be issued in the transaction to Cristal Netherlands is not adjustable based on the market price of Class A Shares, so the transaction consideration at the closing of the transaction may have a greater or lesser implied value than at the time the transaction agreement was signed.

The parties to the transaction agreement have fixed the number of Class A Shares to be issued to Cristal Netherlands, and this number is not adjustable based on changes in the market price of Class A Shares. Any changes in the market price of Class A Shares will not affect the number of Class A Shares that Cristal Netherlands is entitled to receive pursuant to the transaction agreement. Therefore, if, prior to the closing of the transaction, the market price of Class A Shares declines from the market price on the date of the transaction agreement, Cristal Netherlands would receive consideration with less implied value. Conversely, if, prior to the closing of the transaction, the market price for Class A Shares increases from the market price on the date of the transaction agreement, Cristal Netherlands would receive consideration with more implied value. Because the number of Class A Shares to be issued in the transaction to Cristal Netherlands does not adjust as a result of changes in the value of Class A Shares, for any amount that the market value of Class A Shares rises or declines, there is a corresponding rise or decline, respectively, in the value of the aggregate share consideration issued to Cristal Netherlands.

Class A and Class B Shareholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest in Tronox (as a proportion of the total outstanding shares) after the transaction and will exercise less influence over management.

Class A and Class B Shareholders currently possess all voting rights with respect to the election of the Tronox board of directors and on other matters affecting Tronox. Upon the closing of the transaction, Cristal Netherlands will

receive shares in the transaction constituting approximately 24% of the outstanding Class A Shares and Class B Shares immediately after the transaction. As a result, current Class A and Class B Shareholders, as a group, will own approximately 76% of the outstanding Class A Shares and Class B Shares immediately after the transaction. As a result, current Class A Shareholders may have less influence on the management and policies of Tronox than they now have. While the ability of Class B Shareholder to elect Class B directors and consent to certain corporate actions as set forth in Tronox’s constitution and shareholder’s deed will not change, the current Class B Shareholder may have less influence on matters submitted to shareholders to be voted on as a single class than they now have.

In addition, Exxaro has announced its intention to begin pursuing a path to monetize its ownership stake in Tronox over time. As a result, Cristal may have the largest stake in Tronox and greater influence over the affairs of Tronox, and current Class A Shareholders may have less influence on the management and policies of Tronox than they now have.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated financial statements, which we refer to as the pro forma financial statements, are presented for illustrative purposes only and may not be an indication of the combined company’s financial condition or results of operations following the transaction.

The pro forma financial statements contained in this proxy statement are presented for illustrative purposes only and may not be an indication of the combined company’s financial condition or results of operations following the transaction for several reasons. For example, the pro forma financial statements have been derived from the historical financial statements of Tronox and Cristal, and certain adjustments and assumptions have been made regarding the combined company after giving effect to the transaction. This information upon which these adjustments and assumptions have been made is preliminary, and such adjustments and assumptions are difficult to make with complete accuracy. Further, the final allocation of the purchase price will be determined after the closing of the transaction and after completion of an analysis to determine the fair value of the assets and liabilities of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business. Accordingly, the final purchase accounting adjustments may be materially different from the unaudited pro forma adjustments.

Moreover, the pro forma financial statements do not reflect all costs that are expected to be incurred by the combined company in connection with the transaction. For example, the impact of any incremental costs incurred in integrating Cristal’s TiO ₂ business into Tronox is not reflected in the pro forma financial statements. As a result, the actual financial condition and results of operations of the combined company following the transaction may differ significantly from these pro form financial statements.

In addition, the assumptions used in preparing the pro forma financial statements may not prove to be accurate, and other factors may affect the combined company’s financial condition or results of operations following the transaction. Any potential decline in the combined company’s financial condition or results of operations may cause significant variations in the market value of Class A Shares following the transaction. See the section entitled “Selected Historical and Pro Forma Combined Financial Data—Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data of Tronox and Cristal” beginning on page 15 .

If Cristal Netherlands immediately sells Class A Shares received in the transaction it could depress the market value of Class A Shares.

Under the shareholders agreement, Cristal Netherlands is permitted to sell up to an aggregate number of Class A Shares equal to 4% of the total number of outstanding voting securities immediately after the closing of the transaction, as adjusted for any stock split, reverse stock split or similar transaction. If Cristal Netherlands sells significant amounts of Class A Shares following the transaction (subject to transfer restrictions specified in the shareholders agreements, as more fully described in the section entitled “The Shareholders Agreement—Transfer Restrictions” beginning on page 66 ), the market price of Class A Shares could decrease. In addition, Exxaro has announced its intention to begin pursuing a path to monetize its ownership stake in Tronox over time. Any such sales may also make it more difficult for Tronox to issue equity securities or equity-related securities in the future at a time and at a price that we otherwise would deem appropriate.

The market value of Class A Shares and Class B Shares after the transaction may be affected by factors different from those affecting Tronox currently.

The results of operations of the combined company and the market value of Class A Shares and Class B Shares after the completion of the transaction may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the independent results of operations of each of Tronox and Cristal’s TiO ₂ business. For a discussion of Tronox’s business

and Cristal’s TiO ₂ business, please see the section entitled “Information About the Companies” beginning on page 28 and the documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement and referred to under the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 110 .

Regulatory approvals may not be received, may take longer than expected or may impose conditions that are not presently anticipated or that could have an adverse effect on the combined company following the transaction.

Completion of the transaction is conditioned upon filings with, and, in certain cases, the receipt of governmental authorizations, consents, orders or other approvals from, certain governmental entities, including the FTC, the Antitrust Division, the Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia and certain other foreign authorities. The parties have made or plan to make initial filings with each of these governmental entities where required. The parties received a request for additional information from the FTC on April 13, 2017, to which the parties are responding, and the applicable waiting period under U.S. antitrust laws has not yet expired or been terminated. In addition to the FTC, several other governmental entities have not concluded their review and/or yet provided the requisite authorizations, consents, orders or other approvals.

There is no assurance that all of these required authorizations, consents, orders and other approvals will be obtained, and, if they are obtained, they may not be obtained before you vote on the proposal relating to the transaction. Moreover, if they are obtained, they may require actions or impose restrictions, limitations or conditions on Tronox or Cristal’s TiO ₂ business. The transaction agreement requires the parties to satisfy any actions, or to agree to any restrictions, limitations or conditions, so long as such actions, restrictions, limitations or conditions would not be detrimental to Cristal Netherlands or any of the transferred Cristal entities, taken as a whole, or Tronox and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole. It is possible that such actions, restrictions, limitations or conditions may have an adverse effect on the business, assets, liabilities, prospects, outlook, financial condition or results of operations of Tronox or Cristal’s TiO ₂ business, but not qualify as detrimental under the transaction agreement. These required actions, restrictions, limitations and conditions also may jeopardize or delay completion of the transaction, reduce the anticipated benefits of the transaction or allow the parties to terminate the transaction.

Please see the section entitled “The Transaction—Regulatory Approvals Required for the Transaction” beginning on page 48 for additional information with regard to the required regulatory filings and approvals.

The fairness opinion obtained by Tronox from its financial advisor will not reflect changes in circumstances subsequent to the date of the fairness opinion.

Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Tronox’s financial advisor in connection with the transaction, has delivered to the Tronox board of directors its opinion dated as of February 20, 2017, that as of such date, and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the transaction consideration to be paid to Cristal and Cristal Netherlands pursuant to the transaction agreement was fair from a financial point of view to Tronox. The opinion does not reflect changes that may occur or may have occurred after the date of the opinion, including changes to the operations and prospects of Tronox or Cristal’s TiO ₂ business, changes in general market and economic conditions or regulatory or other factors. Any such change, or changes in other factors on which the opinion is based, may materially alter or affect the relative values of Tronox and Cristal’s TiO ₂ business. The fairness opinion will not be updated as of the date of the mailing of this proxy statement.

Each of Tronox’s business and Cristal’s TiO ₂ business will be subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the transaction is pending.

Tronox and Cristal’s TiO ₂ business have operated and, until the completion of the transaction, will continue to operate, independently. Uncertainty about the effect of the transaction on employees and customers may have an adverse effect on Cristal’s TiO ₂ business and consequently on Tronox. These uncertainties may impair the ability of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business to attract, retain or motivate key personnel until the closing of the transaction, and could cause customers and others that deal with Cristal’s TiO ₂ business to seek to change existing business relationships with Cristal’s TiO ₂ business. Retention of certain employees of each of Tronox and Cristal’s TiO ₂ business may be challenging during the pendency of the transaction, as certain employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with Tronox. If key employees depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with Tronox or be employed by, Tronox’s business following the transaction could be harmed. In addition, the transaction agreement restricts each of Tronox and Cristal’s TiO ₂ business from making certain acquisitions and taking other specified actions until the transaction occurs without the other party.

These restrictions may prevent each of Tronox and Cristal’s TiO ₂ business form pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise prior to the closing of the transaction. For additional information, please see the section entitled “The Transaction Agreement—Conduct of Business Prior to Closing” beginning on page 54 .

The transaction is subject to closing conditions, including the approval of the issuance of the Class A Shares by the Tronox shareholders at the special meeting or an adjournment or postponement thereof, that, if not satisfied or waived, will result in the transaction not being completed, which may result in material adverse consequences to Tronox’s business and operations.

The transaction is subject to closing conditions, including the approval of the issuance of the stock consideration by the Tronox shareholders at the special meeting or an adjournment or postponement thereof, that, if not satisfied, will prevent the transaction from being completed. To Tronox’s knowledge, all of the directors and executive officers of Tronox who are entitled to vote at the special meeting intend to vote their Class A Shares in favor of the proposal, although such persons have not entered into agreements obligating them to do so. If the transaction is not completed, Tronox’s business and operations could be adversely affected by the loss of employees and customers, the costs incurred in pursuing the transaction, and potential reputational harm. In addition to the required approvals and consents from regulatory agencies and governmental entities and the approval of Tronox shareholders, the transaction is subject to other conditions beyond Tronox’s control that may prevent, delay or otherwise materially adversely affect its completion. Tronox cannot predict whether and when these other conditions will be satisfied. For additional information, please see the section entitled “The Transaction Agreement—Conditions to Consummate the Closing” beginning on page 61 .

Failure to obtain the necessary financing to complete the transaction, including by reason of not being able to sell Tronox’s Alkali business, could delay or prevent the completion of the transaction.

The transaction agreement provides that if Tronox is unable to obtain financing sufficient, together with all available cash and other proceeds, to fund the cash portion of the transaction consideration, the transaction may not be completed. The majority of the cash portion of the transaction consideration is expected to be funded through proceeds from the closing of the sale of Tronox’s Alkali business, with the remainder funded through proceeds from additional indebtedness and/or cash on hand, as determined by Tronox as circumstances warrant. The completion of the sale of the Alkali business may not occur, in which case Tronox may seek additional third-party debt financing. Tronox cannot make assurances that it will be able to obtain financing on terms acceptable to Tronox, if at all. Further, Tronox cannot make assurances that it will be able to consummate a sale of its Alkali business. If Tronox is unable to obtain the necessary financing and/or consummate a sale of its Alkali business, that may affect Tronox’s ability to consummate the transaction and, depending on the circumstances, it could be required to pay a $100 million termination fee to Cristal, which would materially adversely affect Tronox’s business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity. For additional information, please see the sections entitled “The Transaction Agreement—Termination of the Transaction Agreement” and “The Transaction Agreement—Effect of Termination” beginning on pages 63 and 64, respectively.

In connection with the transaction, Tronox may incur or assume significant additional indebtedness, which could adversely affect Tronox, including by decreasing Tronox’s business flexibility and increasing Tronox’s interest expense.

Tronox may be required to incur significant additional indebtedness to close the transaction. This increased indebtedness could have the effect, among other things, of reducing Tronox's flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions and increasing Tronox’s interest expense. In addition, the amount of cash required to pay interest on Tronox’s indebtedness following the closing of the transaction, and thus the demands on Tronox's cash resources, will be greater than the amount of cash required to service the indebtedness of Tronox prior to the transaction. The increased levels of indebtedness following the closing of the transaction could, therefore, reduce funds available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes and may create competitive disadvantages for Tronox relative to other companies with lower debt levels.

In connection with any potential debt financing, it is anticipated that Tronox would seek ratings of its indebtedness from one or more nationally recognized credit rating agencies. Tronox's credit ratings reflect each rating organization's opinion of Tronox's financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet Tronox's debt obligations. Tronox's credit ratings affect the cost and availability of future borrowings and, accordingly, Tronox's cost of capital. There can be no assurance that Tronox will achieve a particular rating or maintain a particular rating in the future.

Additionally, Tronox and certain of its subsidiaries are parties to existing credit facilities that may provide such lenders with consent rights in connection with the transaction. While obtaining such consents is not a condition to the closing of the transaction, if such consents are required, failure to obtain them would result in defaults or events of defaults under the facilities. Further, such consents may be conditioned on increases to pricing or other additional fees and could result in an overall increase in the financing costs incurred in connection with the transaction.

Tronox may be required to raise additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate purposes. Tronox's ability to arrange additional financing or refinancing will depend on, among other factors, Tronox's financial position and performance, as well as prevailing market conditions and other factors beyond Tronox’s control. Tronox cannot provide assurance that it will be able to obtain additional financing or refinancing on terms acceptable to Tronox or at all.

The issuance of the Class A Shares to Cristal Netherlands in connection with the transaction increases the risk that Tronox could, as a result of future investments in Tronox Class A Shares or Class B Shares by “5% stockholders,” experience an “ownership change” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which could materially affect Tronox’s ability to utilize its net operating losses and certain other tax attributes and adversely impact Tronox’s results of operations.

Tronox has substantial deferred tax assets related to net operating losses (“NOLs”) and certain other tax attributes for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes, which Tronox currently expects to be available to offset future taxable income. Tronox’s ability to utilize or realize the current carrying value of the NOLs may be impacted by certain events, including annual limits imposed under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), or applicable provisions of state law, as a result of an “ownership change.” Although Tronox does not currently anticipate that the issuance of the Class A Shares to Cristal Netherlands in connection with the transaction will result in an “ownership change” for U.S. federal and applicable state income tax purposes, the issuance of such shares increases the risk that Tronox could experience an “ownership change” in the future as a result of future issuances of Class A Shares or Class B Shares (or certain other securities) or certain direct or indirect changes in the ownership of such Shares or other securities ( e.g. , as a result of a disposition of shares currently owned by existing “5% stockholders”, including Exxaro).

An “ownership change” is generally defined as a cumulative change of 50 percentage points or more (by value) in the ownership positions of certain “5% stockholders” of a corporation during a rolling three year period. Upon an “ownership change,” a corporation generally is subject to an annual limit on the ability to utilize pre-change NOLs and certain other tax attributes to offset future taxable income and gain in an amount equal to the value of the corporation's market capitalization immediately before the “ownership change” multiplied by the adjusted long-term tax-exempt rate set by the Internal Revenue Service. Since NOLs generally may be carried forward for up to 20 years, the annual limitation may result in the inability to utilize certain pre-change NOLs and other tax attributes.

In the event an “ownership change” were to occur, Tronox could lose the ability to use a significant portion of its NOLs and certain other tax attributes. The amount of such loss would depend, among other things, on the size of the annual limitation (which, in part, would be determined based on Tronox’s market capitalization at the time of an ownership change) and the remaining carry-forward period for such losses. Any permanent loss would have a material adverse effect on Tronox’s results of operations and financial condition.

Tronox may not be able to continue to grow through acquisitions.

In the past, Tronox has sought growth through acquisitions of, or significant investments in, businesses that offer complementary products and services or otherwise support its growth objectives. However, following the consummation of the transaction, Tronox cannot provide assurance that it will continue to identify attractive acquisition targets and consummate acquisitions. Upon the closing of the transaction and the incurrence of any debt in connection therewith, Tronox’s anticipated level of indebtedness may be significantly higher than prior to the closing of the transaction. As a result, Tronox cannot assure you that it will be able to arrange financing for future acquisitions on terms acceptable to it. In addition, the combined company will be a substantially larger company than Tronox is at this time and may face additional scrutiny in connection with federal and state governmental approvals in connection with any future acquisitions of attractive targets and may not be able to obtain such approvals at all. The realization of any of these risks could adversely affect Tronox’s business.

The combined company’s future results could suffer if it does not effectively manage its expanded business, operations and employee base following the transaction.

The size of the combined company’s business, operations and employee base following the transaction will be greater than the standalone size of the business, operations and employee base of either Tronox or Cristal’s TiO ₂ business prior to the transaction. The combined company’s future success depends, in part, upon its ability to manage this expanded business, operations and employee base, which will pose substantial challenges for management, including challenges related to the management and monitoring of new operations and associated increased costs and complexity. No assurances can be given that the combined company will successfully manage its expanded business, operations and employee base following the transaction.

Failure to complete the transaction may negatively impact the market value of Class A Shares and the future business of Tronox and Tronox will have incurred substantial expenses without realizing the expected benefits of the transaction.

The transaction agreement provides that either Tronox or Cristal may terminate the transaction agreement if the transaction is not consummated on or before May 21, 2018. In addition, the transaction agreement contains certain termination rights for each of Tronox and Cristal. Upon termination of the transaction agreement under specific circumstances, Tronox would be required to pay Cristal a termination fee of $100 million or to reimburse Cristal for certain expenses not to exceed $15 million. For additional information, see the sections entitled “The Transaction Agreement—Termination of the Transaction Agreement” and “The Transaction—Effect of Termination” beginning on pages 63 and 64, respectively

If the transaction is not completed, the price of Class A Shares may decline to the extent that the current market price reflects a market assumption that the transaction will be completed and that the related benefits will be realized, or a market perception that the transaction was not consummated due to an adverse change in the business of Tronox. Additionally, if the transaction is not completed, Tronox will have incurred, or will incur, substantial expenses in connection with the due diligence, negotiation and completion of the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreement, as well as the costs and expenses of preparing, filing, printing and mailing this proxy statement and all filing fees paid to the SEC and other regulators in connection with the transaction. If the transaction is not completed on a timely basis, Tronox’s business and Cristal’s TiO ₂ business may be adversely affected. If the transaction is not completed at all, Tronox will be subject to a number of risks, including (i) being required to pay costs and expenses relating to the transaction, such as legal, accounting, financial advisory and printing fees, whether or not the transaction is completed, and (ii) time and resources committed by Tronox’s management to matters relating to the transaction that could otherwise have been devoted to pursuing other beneficial opportunities.

Prior to its acquisition by Tronox, Cristal’s TiO ₂ business was a private company and has not previously been subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the rules and regulations of the SEC or other corporate governance requirements.

Cristal is a private company and has not been subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the rules and regulations of the SEC, or other corporate governance requirements to which public reporting companies may be subject. As a result, Tronox will be required to implement the appropriate internal control processes and procedures over the financial accounting and reporting of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business. The combined company may incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses in efforts to ensure that Cristal’s TiO ₂ business meets these requirements. Implementing the controls and procedures at Cristal’s TiO ₂ business that are required to comply with the various applicable laws and regulations may place a significant burden on management and internal resources. The diversion of management’s attention and any difficulties encountered in such an implementation could adversely affect the combined company’s business, financial condition and operating results.

The combined company will be exposed to the risks of operating a global business in new countries.

Cristal’s TiO ₂ business operates in certain countries, such as the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, in which Tronox has not historically had operations or business. The combined company will need to manage any increased risks related to adapting to unfamiliar regional and geopolitical conditions and demands. The combined company may also face increased difficulties with regard to political and social attitudes, laws, rules, regulations and policies within countries that favor domestic companies over non-domestic companies, including customer- or government-supported efforts to promote the development and growth of local competitors. Further, the combined company may be subject to new and unfamiliar laws and regulations at national, regional and local levels, including taxation regimes, labor and

environmental and health and safety laws and regulations. The combined company may also be required to implement additional technological and cybersecurity measures and cost reduction efforts, including restructuring activities, or which may adversely affect the combined company’s ability to capitalize on opportunities. These factors, in addition to the difficulties and uncertainties associated with entering into new countries, including cultural and language differences, will make it more challenging for the combined company to forecast its operating results, make business decisions and identify and prioritize the risks that may affect its business, sources and uses of cash, financial condition and results of operations.

Risk Factors Relating to Tronox and Tronox’s Business.

Tronox is, and will continue to be, subject to the risks described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 21 and in Tronox’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as updated by other reports filed with the SEC, including Tronox’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, which are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. For additional information, see the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 110 .

INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANIES

Tronox Limited

Tronox is a public limited company registered under the laws of the State of Western Australia. We are a global leader in the production and marketing of titanium bearing mineral sands and titanium dioxide (“TiO ₂ ”) pigment, and the world’s largest producer of natural soda ash. Titanium feedstock is primarily used to manufacture TiO ₂ . Our TiO ₂ products are critical components of everyday applications such as paint and other coatings, plastics, paper, and other uses, and our related mineral sands product streams include titanium feedstock, zircon, and pig iron. Zircon, a hard, glossy mineral, is used for the manufacture of ceramics, refractories, TV screen glass, and a range of other industrial and chemical products. Pig iron is a metal material used in the steel and metal casting industries to create wrought iron, cast iron, and steel.

We produce natural soda ash from a mineral called trona, which we mine, at two facilities we own near Green River, Wyoming. At these facilities we process the trona ore into chemically pure soda ash and specialty sodium products such as sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) and sodium sesquicarbonate (S- Carb ^® and Sesqui™). We sell soda ash directly to customers in the United States, Canada and the European Community, European Free Trade Association and South African Customs Union and to the American Natural Soda Ash Corporation (“ANSAC”), a non-profit foreign sales association in which we and two other U.S. soda ash producers are members. ANSAC then resells the soda ash to customers around the world. Our soda ash is used primarily by customers in the glass, detergent, and chemicals manufacturing industries. We use a portion of our soda ash at Green River to produce specialty sodium products such as sodium bicarbonate and sodium sesquicarbonate that have uses in food, animal feed, pharmaceutical, and medical applications.

In June 2012, Tronox Limited issued Class B Ordinary Shares to Exxaro Resources Limited (“Exxaro”) and one of its subsidiaries in consideration for 74% of Exxaro’s South African mineral sands business, and the existing business of Tronox Incorporated was combined with the mineral sands business in an integrated series of transactions whereby Tronox Limited became the parent company. At May 31, 2017, Exxaro held approximately 43% of the voting securities of Tronox Limited. Exxaro has agreed not to acquire any additional voting shares of Tronox Limited if, following such acquisition, Exxaro will have a voting interest in Tronox Limited of 50% or more unless Exxaro brings any proposal to make such an acquisition to the Board of Directors of Tronox Limited on a confidential basis. In the event an agreement regarding the proposal is not reached, Exxaro is permitted to make a takeover offer for all the shares of Tronox Limited not held by affiliates of Exxaro, subject to certain non-waivable conditions. On March 8, 2017, Exxaro announced its intention to begin pursuing a path to monetize its ownership stake in Tronox over time. According to Exxaro’s announcement, any such monetization is expected to proceed in stages and would likely not begin until the second half of 2017.

Additional information about Tronox and its subsidiaries is included in documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement. See the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 110 .

The National Titanium Dioxide Company Limited

Cristal is a privately held company registered under the laws of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Cristal is a global leader in the production and marketing of titanium bearing mineral sands and TiO ₂ pigment, and the world’s largest producer of merchant titanium tetrachloride (“TiCl ₄ ”). Titanium feedstock is primarily used to manufacture TiO ₂ . Cristal’s TiO ₂ products are critical components of everyday applications such as paint and other coatings, plastics, paper, and other uses, and Cristal’s related mineral sands product streams include titanium feedstock and zircon. Zircon, a hard, glossy mineral, is used for the manufacture of ceramics, refractories, TV screen glass, and a range of other industrial and chemical products. TiCl ₄ is a critical intermediate in the production of titanium metal.

Cristal is currently owned 79% by the National Industrialization Company Ltd. (“TASNEE”) (a publically listed Saudi Arabian joint stock company), 20% by Gulf Investment Corporation (a company equally owned by the six states of the Gulf Cooperation Council and headquartered in Kuwait) and 1% by a private investor.

THE SPECIAL MEETING

General Information

This proxy statement is being furnished to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Tronox board of directors for use at the special meeting of Tronox shareholders.

A resolution approving the proposal needs to be passed at the special meeting. Both Class A Shareholders and Class B Shareholders may vote at the special meeting. However, no vote may be cast in favor of the proposal by Cristal Netherlands, any of the Cristal shareholder parties or any of their associates. Any such vote that is so cast will be disregarded.

Time, Date and Location

The special meeting will be held at 9:00 a.m., U.S. Eastern Time at the Stamford Marriott Hotel, 243 Tresser Boulevard, Stamford, Connecticut 06901, U.S.A. on Monday, October 2, 2017, or at such other time and place to which the special meeting may be adjourned. For directions to the special meeting, contact us at +1 (203) 705-3800. References in this proxy statement to the special meeting also refer to any adjournments or changes in location to the meeting, to the extent applicable.

Purpose of the Special Meeting

At the Tronox special meeting, Tronox shareholders will be asked to consider and vote on a proposal to approve the issuance of 37,580,000 Class A Shares to Cristal Netherlands and the resulting acquisition of interests in the Class A Shares by Cristal Netherlands and certain other persons and entities pursuant to the transaction.

Record Date; Stock Entitled to Vote

Only shareholders of record at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 28, 2017, the record date for the special meeting, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. On May 31, 2017, there were 67,893,737 shares of our Class A Shares and 51,154,280 shares of our Class B Shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting. Shareholders will have one vote for each Class A Share and Class B Share they own on the record date, in person or through the Internet or by telephone or by a properly executed and delivered proxy with respect to the special meeting. On May 31, 2017, our directors and executive officers and their affiliates owned and were entitled to vote 1,426,646 shares of Class A Shares, or 1.9% of the Class A Shares outstanding on that date and 51,154,280 shares of Class B Shares, or 100% of the Class B Shares outstanding on that date. We currently expect that our directors and executive officers will vote their shares in favor of the proposal, subject to no superior proposal emerging, although none of them has entered into any agreement obligating them to do so.

Delivery of Proxy Materials

These materials were first sent or made available to shareholders on or about August 31, 2017. If you previously chose to receive proxy materials by e-mail, we have arranged to have these materials delivered to you in accordance with that election. Shareholders may request to receive proxy materials electronically by e-mail during the voting period. Choosing to receive your future proxy materials by e-mail will save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you, as well as solicitation costs, if any. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail before the next annual meeting with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by e-mail will remain in effect until you terminate it.

If your ordinary shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent you are considered, with respect to those shares, the registered shareholder of record, and we are sending this proxy statement and the other proxy materials directly to you. As the shareholder of record, you have the right to appoint a proxy to attend the meeting and vote on your behalf (and, if you are entitled to cast two or more votes at the meeting, to appoint two proxies). We have enclosed applicable proxy cards for you to use.

Proxy Cards

Most shareholders hold their shares through a broker or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. If your shares are held by a broker or by another nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of these shares even though they are held in “street-name,” and these proxy materials should be forwarded to you by the broker,

trustee or nominee together with a voting instruction card. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, trustee or nominee how to vote and you are invited to attend the special meeting. Since a beneficial owner is not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting. Your broker, trustee or nominee has enclosed or provided voting instructions for you to use in directing the broker, trustee or nominee how to vote your shares.

Each registered shareholder will receive one copy of each such notice per account even if at the same address, while most banks and brokers will deliver only one copy of such notice to consenting “street-name” shareholders (you own shares beneficially in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record on the books of our transfer agent) who share the same address. This procedure reduces our printing and distribution costs. Those who wish to receive separate copies may do so by contacting their bank, broker or other nominee. Similarly, “streetname” shareholders who receive multiple copies of the notice at a single address may request that only a single copy be sent to them in the future by contacting their bank, broker or other nominee. If you hold your shares in “street-name” through a broker, bank or other nominee, you must provide the recorded holder of your shares with instructions on how to vote the shares.

Please follow the voting instructions provided by the bank or broker. Brokers, banks and other nominees who hold Tronox ordinary shares on behalf of their beneficial owners may not give a proxy to Tronox to vote those shares with respect to the proposal without specific voting instructions from such beneficial owners, as such matters to be voted upon at the special meeting are not considered a routine matter under the NYSE Rule 452 and brokers, banks and other nominees do not have discretionary voting power for such non-routine matters. Any votes cast by street-name shareholders or brokers, banks or other nominees will be treated as though they were votes cast by the shareholder of record. You may not vote shares held in street-name by returning a proxy card directly to us or by voting in person at the special meeting unless you provide a “legal proxy,” which you must obtain from your broker, bank or other nominee. Any votes cast pursuant to a “legal proxy” will be treated as though they were cast by the shareholder of record.

Voting Procedures

Registered Shareholders: Registered shareholders may vote their shares or submit a proxy to have their shares voted by one of the following methods:

In Person. You may vote in person at the special meeting by completing a ballot at the special meeting; however, attending a meeting without completing a ballot will not count as a vote.

By Telephone. You may submit a proxy by telephone (from U.S. and Canada only) using the toll-free number listed on the proxy card. Please have your proxy card in hand when you call. Telephone voting facilities will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m., U.S. Eastern Time, on Sunday, October 1, 2017.

By Mail. You may indicate your votes at the special meeting by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and returning it in the business reply envelope to Tronox Limited, 263 Tresser Boulevard, Suite 1100, Stamford, Connecticut 06901, U.S.A. or Tronox Limited, P.O. Box 305, Kwinana, Western Australia, Australia, 6966. All mailed votes must be received prior to 11:59 p.m, U.S. Eastern Time, on Sunday, October 1, 2017.

By Fax. You may indicate your votes by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and returning it by fax to +1 (203) 705-3703 (U.S.A.) or +61 (0) 8 9 365-1390 (Australia). All faxed votes must be received prior to 11:59 p.m., U.S. Eastern Time, on Sunday, October 1, 2017.

Each shareholder entitled to vote at the special meeting may appoint a proxy or attorney to attend and vote at the special meeting. A shareholder entitled to cast two or more votes at a special meeting is entitled to appoint two proxies for the special meeting. The shareholder must specify the proportion or number of votes that the proxy may exercise. A proxy need not be a shareholder of Tronox.

“Street-name” Shareholders: Shareholders whose shares are held in “street-name” by a broker or other nominee may generally vote their shares or submit a proxy to have their shares voted by one of the following methods:

By Methods Listed on Voting Instruction Form. Please refer to your voting instruction form or other information forwarded by your bank, broker or other holder of record to determine whether you may submit a proxy electronically on the Internet or by telephone following the instructions on the voting instruction form or other information provided by the record holder.

In Person with a Proxy from the Record Holder. A street-name shareholder who wishes to vote in person at the special meeting will need to obtain a legal proxy from their bank, broker or other nominee. Please consult the voting instruction form or other information sent to you by your bank, broker or other nominee to determine how to obtain a legal proxy in order to vote in person at the special meetings.

Tabulation of Votes

Votes cast by proxy or in person at the special meeting will be tabulated by a proxy tabulator.

Quorum Requirements and Effect of Abstention and Broker Non-Votes

Shareholders present in person, or by proxy, attorney or representative at the special meeting will be included in the determination of shareholders present at the special meeting for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum, even if they abstain from or do not vote on the proposal. Generally, broker non-votes occur when shares held by a broker present at the meeting for a beneficial owner are not voted with respect to a particular proposal because the proposal is not a routine matter, and the broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. The proposal is a “non-routine” matter under the NYSE rules. Our constitution requires that a quorum of shareholders—the holders of a majority of outstanding shares—be present or represented by proxy to conduct business at the special meeting. Class A Shareholders and Class B Shareholders are counted together to determine whether a quorum is present at the special meeting.

Although abstentions and broker non-votes count as “shares present” at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum if the holder of record of the relevant shares is present at the meeting in person, or by proxy, attorney or representative, they will not be counted as votes in favor of or against the proposal. Accordingly, a depository cannot cast a vote in favor of or against the proposal absent instruction from the underlying beneficial owner. For the purpose of determining whether shareholders have approved the proposal, abstentions and broker non-votes will not count in determining whether the resolution has been passed by a majority of the votes cast on the resolution.

Revocation of Proxies

Holders of ordinary shares can revoke their proxy at any time before it is voted at the special meeting by either:

To be effective for the meeting, however, a later-dated proxy must be received by Tronox no later than 11:59 p.m, U.S. Eastern Time on Sunday, October 1, 2017, and be given in accordance with the requirements specified in the section entitled “Proxies” of the Notice of Special Meeting.

If your ordinary shares are held beneficially in street-name, you may revoke your proxy by following the instructions provided by your broker, trustee, nominee or depository, as applicable.

Vote Confidentiality

Tronox has a confidential voting policy to protect our shareholders’ voting privacy. Under this policy, ballots, proxy forms and voting instructions returned to brokerage firms, banks and other holders are kept confidential. Only the proxy tabulator and Inspector of Elections have access to the ballots, proxy forms and voting instructions. The proxy tabulator will disclose information taken from the ballots, proxy forms and voting instructions only if there is a proxy contest, if the shareholder authorizes disclosure, to defend legal claims or as otherwise required by law.

Special Meeting Admission

Attendance at the special meeting is limited to shareholders (or their proxies, attorneys or representatives). Guests may be admitted. Admission to the special meeting is on a first-come, first-served basis. Registration for the special meeting begins at 8:30 a.m., U.S. Eastern Time, on Monday, October 2, 2017, and you will be asked to present a valid picture identification and proof of Tronox share ownership as of the record date. If you hold Tronox shares in a brokerage account, you must bring a copy of a brokerage account statement reflecting your share ownership as of the record date. If you plan to attend as the proxy or attorney of a shareholder, the shareholder must provide valid proof of your appointment no later than 11:59 p.m, U.S. Eastern Time, on October 1, 2017 to our company’s address set forth under the section entitled “—Time, Date and Location” beginning on page 29 . If you plan to attend as a representative of a legal entity you must bring evidence of appointment to the special meeting. Submitting your proxy now will not prevent you from voting your shares at the special meeting if you desire to do so, as your proxy is revocable at your option. The use of cameras at the special meeting is prohibited and they will not be allowed into the special meeting or any other related areas. We realize that many cellular phones have built-in digital cameras, and while these phones may be brought into the meeting room, they may not be used at any time.

Solicitation of Proxies

In accordance with the transaction agreement, the cost of proxy solicitation for the special meeting will be borne by Tronox. Proxies accompanying this proxy statement are solicited by the Tronox board of directors. Proxies may be solicited by officers, directors and executive employees of Tronox, none of whom will receive any additional compensation for their services. We have retained Okapi Partners LLC, 1212 Avenue of Americas, New York, NY 10036 to distribute and solicit proxies. We will pay Okapi a fee not to exceed $15,000, plus certain variable fees related to calling services plus other reasonable expense reimbursement for these services. Tronox will bear the cost of solicitations and the fees related to the solicitation of proxies. Each holder of our Class A Shares or Class B Shares who does not expect to be present at the special meeting or who plans to attend but who does not wish to vote in person is urged to fill in, date and sign the proxies and return them promptly in the enclosed return envelopes or vote by telephone or on the Internet.

THE TRANSACTION

The following is a discussion of the proposed transaction, the transaction agreement and the form of shareholders agreement. This is a summary only and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. A copy of the transaction agreement is attached to this proxy statement as Annex A and a form of the shareholders agreement is attached to this proxy as Annex B, both of which are incorporated by reference herein. Tronox shareholders are urged to read this entire proxy statement, including the transaction agreement, for a more complete understanding of the transaction.

General Description of Transaction

On February 21, 2017, Tronox entered into a transaction agreement with Cristal and Cristal Netherlands, pursuant to which Cristal and Cristal Netherlands will effect a restructuring under which the assets and operations relating to the TiO ₂ business of Cristal will be reorganized under one or more entities owned by Cristal BV, and Cristal will separately establish a new entity in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to hold certain assets and operations in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Although the TiO ₂ business represents substantially all of Cristal’s operations, Tronox will not acquire as part of the transaction the Retained Cristal Business.

On August 2, 2017, Tronox announced its entry into a stock purchase agreement with Genesis Energy, L.P. providing for the sale of the Alkali business for $1.325 billion in cash, the proceeds of which will be used to fund the majority portion of the cash consideration for the Cristal transaction. At the same time, Tronox announced its intention to refinance a portion of its capital structure by mid-October 2017.

The transaction agreement provides that, subject to the terms and conditions of the transaction agreement, at the closing of the transaction, Tronox will acquire the TiO ₂ business of Cristal through (i) the purchase from Cristal of certain intangible assets and the newly established Kingdom of Saudi Arabia entity, and (ii) the purchase from Cristal Netherlands of all of the outstanding equity of Cristal BV. The majority of the cash portion of the Cristal transaction consideration is expected to be funded through proceeds from the closing of the sale of Tronox’s Alkali business as described above, with the remainder funded through proceeds from additional indebtedness and/or cash on hand, as determined by Tronox as circumstances warrant.

It is anticipated that upon the closing of the transaction, Tronox shareholders existing immediately prior to the closing of the transaction will own approximately 76%, and Cristal Netherlands will own approximately 24%, of the combined company’s outstanding Class A Shares and Class B Shares.

Prior to the closing of the transaction and pursuant to the transaction agreement, Tronox will use its reasonable best efforts to cause two directors designated by the Cristal shareholder parties (to be mutually agreed by Tronox as the Cristal shareholder parties) to be elected as Class A Directors (the overall number of directors, however, will remain the same). The current executive officers of Tronox are expected to remain unchanged.

Transaction Consideration

In consideration of the foregoing, Tronox (i) will make an aggregate cash payment equal to $1,673 million, subject to certain adjustments, to Cristal and Cristal Netherlands, and (ii) will issue and deliver to Cristal Netherlands 37,580,000 Class A Shares. Neither the cash portion nor the share portion of the transaction consideration will be adjusted to reflect changes to Tronox’s share price prior to the closing of the transaction, but the cash portion is subject to certain adjustments related to the working capital, cash on hand and certain non-current liabilities of the TiO ₂ business of Cristal.

Upon completion of the transaction and the issuance of the Class A Shares described above, based on the number of shares then outstanding, Tronox shareholders prior to the transaction will own approximately 76% of Tronox’s outstanding Class A and Class B shares and Cristal Netherlands will own approximately 24% of Tronox’s outstanding ordinary shares. For additional information on the transaction’s impact on the voting power of the current Tronox shareholders and Cristal, see the sections entitled “Proposal Submitted to Shareholders” and “Additional Information Relating to Australia’s Takeover Laws” beginning on pages 33 and 71, respectively.

Background of the Transaction

The Tronox board of directors from time to time reviews with senior management Tronox’s strategic direction and the opportunities available to enhance its performance and prospects. These reviews include periodic internal

discussions of projected financial performance and hypothetical acquisitions, dispositions and business combinations with third parties that would add shareholder value and further Tronox’s strategic objectives, as well as the potential benefits and risks of those potential transactions.

In October 2015, representatives of Tronox and Cristal met to discuss a potential strategic transaction following an introduction by a financial advisor to Tronox. Following the meeting, each of Tronox and Cristal engaged in mutual due diligence to determine whether such a transaction was advisable. In November 2015, the Tronox board of directors met to discuss a potential strategic transaction involving Cristal, as well as other potential strategic transactions, with other participants in the titanium dioxide industry, including mergers, equity and asset acquisitions and business combination transactions. The Tronox board of directors instructed Tronox management to continue discussions with Cristal regarding a potential strategic transaction between the two companies and concluded that a transaction with Cristal represented the most actionable and compelling opportunity for Tronox shareholders from a financial point of view as compared to other possibilities.

On December 4, 2015, representatives of Tronox sent an initial non-binding proposal to representatives of Cristal that reflected Tronox’s interest in pursuing a potential strategic transaction between Tronox and Cristal. This proposal excluded certain Cristal mining assets, which were ultimately included in the Cristal transaction, and offered consideration consisting of a long-term lease by Tronox of certain Cristal assets and Tronox shares equal to a 36.5% equity stake in the combined company. The parties met to discuss such potential transaction in New York, New York on December 11, 2015 and January 13, 2016. On January 29, 2016, representatives of Tronox sent a revised non-binding proposal to representatives of Cristal. This revised proposal excluded certain Cristal assets as did the proposal made on December 4, 2015, but modified the proposed purchase price to include consideration consisting of a $150 million unsecured note, a long-term lease by Tronox of certain Cristal assets with increased lease payments compared to the December 4 proposal and a 36.5% equity stake in the combined company.

The parties could not reach agreement on valuation, primarily relating to differences in views on the value of certain Cristal mining assets, Tronox Alkali and certain Tronox tax assets, as well as the appropriate foreign exchange rates applicable to each party’s projected five-year cash flows, and terminated discussions in the middle of February 2016. During this time, Cristal did not make a counterproposal but noted that there remained a significant difference in the parties’ respective views on valuation of the Cristal assets that Tronox proposed to acquire.

On April 4, 2016, Mr. Moazzam Khan, Chief Financial Officer of Cristal, contacted Dr. Willem Van Niekerk, Senior Vice President of Strategic Planning and Development of Tronox, by telephone to inquire whether Tronox would be interested in resuming discussions regarding a potential strategic transaction between the parties. During the month of April 2016, the parties performed additional due diligence.

On May 6, 2016, representatives of Tronox provided a new non-binding written proposal to representatives of Cristal that reflected Tronox’s interest in pursuing a potential strategic transaction between Tronox and Cristal. This further revised proposal excluded certain assets, as did the proposals made on December 4, 2015 and January 29, 2016, but withdrew the concept of an unsecured note, and included increased long-term lease payments and a 45.5% equity stake in the combined company.

On May 31, 2016, during discussions between representatives of Tronox and Cristal, Cristal made an oral counterproposal requesting, among other things, additional equity consideration.

On June 29, 2016, representatives of Tronox and Cristal met in New York, New York to discuss valuation. Again, the parties could not reach agreement on valuation for similar reasons as in February 2016 and terminated discussions following this meeting.

During the week of October 3, 2016, Dr. Van Niekerk was contacted by telephone by a representative of Dr. Talal Ali Al-Shair, the Vice Chairman of the TASNEE board of directors and chairman of the Cristal board of directors, regarding a meeting to initiate discussions regarding Tronox’s potential acquisition of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business. On October 13, 2016, Dr. Van Niekerk held a preliminary meeting with Dr. Talal’s representative in Stamford, Connecticut, at which they discussed such an acquisition and determined that senior management of Tronox and Cristal should meet for further discussions.

On October 19, 2016, Dr. Van Niekerk and Mr. Thomas Casey, Tronox’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, met with Dr. Talal and his representative in Boston, Massachusetts to discuss Tronox’s potential acquisition of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business. The parties discussed at a high-level the potential structure of such an acquisition.

On October 21, 2016, Mr. Casey delivered a non-binding written proposal to Cristal that reflected Tronox’s interest in pursuing a potential acquisition of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business for $1.4 billion in cash and a 28% equity stake in the combined company. This letter proposed to acquire all of Cristal’s mining assets and did not propose a lease of any Cristal assets.

During the month of October, members of Tronox senior management, together with Credit Suisse, financial advisor to Tronox, continued to evaluate a potential acquisition of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business by Tronox.

On October 31, 2016, Mr. Casey sent an email to the Tronox board of directors to update them on the status of Tronox management’s discussions with Cristal. Later that same day, Mr. Casey delivered a revised non-binding written proposal to Dr. Talal that reflected Tronox’s interest in pursuing a potential acquisition of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business by Tronox for $1.4 billion in cash and a 30% equity stake in the combined company (subject to a three-year lockup and standstill). Tronox stated that it would be willing to consider providing increased cash consideration and a smaller equity stake if so requested by Cristal’s shareholders.

On November 2, 2016, the Tronox board of directors was briefed on the status of Tronox management’s discussions with Cristal. The Tronox board of directors authorized Tronox management to continue exploring with Cristal management a potential acquisition of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business and to propose non-binding terms for such an acquisition.

On November 6, 2016, Dr. Van Niekerk and a representative of Credit Suisse met with Mr. Khan and a representative of HSBC Holdings plc, financial advisor to Cristal, in London, England to discuss the terms of a potential acquisition of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business by Tronox.

On November 11, 2016, in response to Tronox’s October 31, 2016 proposal, Dr. Talal delivered a non-binding written counter-proposal to Mr. Casey that proposed consideration payable to Cristal consisting of an increased cash purchase price of approximately $1.673 billion and a 25% equity stake in the combined company, as well as the assumption by Tronox of certain liabilities related to Cristal’s TiO ₂ business. This counter-proposal also included a fee payable by Tronox in the event that the closing of the transaction were not to occur in certain circumstances, with the terms of the fee to be consistent with market standards.

On November 13, 2016, in response to Cristal’s counter-proposal, Mr. Casey delivered to Dr. Talal a non-binding written proposal, stating that, subject to due diligence and the negotiation of definitive transaction documents, Tronox would be prepared to agree to the $1.673 billion cash portion of the consideration and to assume the liabilities related to Cristal’s TiO ₂ business if Cristal agreed to receive a smaller equity stake of 22.5% in the combined company (subject to a three-year lockup and standstill) and deliver Cristal’s TiO ₂ business with a minimum of $192 million of cash on its balance sheet at the closing of the transaction.

On November 15, 2016, in response to Tronox’s November 13, 2016 proposal, Dr. Talal delivered to Mr. Casey a non-binding written counter-proposal, in which Cristal proposed an equity stake of 25% in the combined company.

On November 16, 2016, the Tronox board of directors held a regularly scheduled meeting. During this meeting, the Tronox board of directors reviewed with senior management a potential acquisition of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business and discussed, with input from Tronox management, potential financial terms for such an acquisition, as well as the risks and benefits of such an acquisition. Following these discussions, the Tronox board of directors instructed management to continue to pursue a potential acquisition of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business and to seek to negotiate acceptable financial terms for such an acquisition. At the invitation of the Tronox board of directors, Dr. Talal and Mr. Khan attended a portion of this meeting and met various members of the Tronox board of directors in connection with its consideration of such an acquisition. Later that same day, a dinner meeting took place in Amsterdam, Netherlands among Dr. Talal, Mr. Khan, Mr. Casey and Dr. Van Niekerk, during which the parties discussed the terms of such an acquisition.

On November 21, 2016, Dr. Talal delivered to Mr. Casey a revised non-binding written counter-proposal, in which Cristal proposed an equity stake of 24% in the combined company and the right to designate three persons for election to the Tronox board of directors. Cristal stated that it would be prepared to accept the three-year lock-up period only if it was granted an exception to the lock-up allowing it to sell up to 4% of the Tronox shares beginning immediately after the closing of a transaction, and that it was not willing to deliver a minimum of $192 million of cash on its balance sheet at the closing of the transaction.

On November 22, 2016, in response to Cristal’s counter-proposal, Mr. Casey delivered to Dr. Talal a non-binding written counter-proposal. Tronox stated that, subject to due diligence and negotiation of definitive transaction documents, it was prepared to agree to the terms proposed by Cristal in its November 21, 2016 counter-proposal, including the increased equity stake of 24% in the combined company, but Tronox proposed that Cristal have the right to designate two persons (instead of three persons) for election to the Tronox board of directors.

On November 23, 2016, Dr. Talal contacted Mr. Casey by email and stated that Cristal was prepared to agree to Tronox’s proposal that Cristal have the right to designate only two persons for election to the Tronox board of directors.

Over the following weeks, representatives of Tronox and Cristal, together with Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which we refer to as Kirkland, Tronox’s outside legal counsel, and Clifford Chance LLP, which we refer to as Clifford Chance, Cristal’s outside legal counsel, negotiated the terms of the transaction agreement and shareholders agreement, and Tronox entered into a confidentiality agreement with Cristal and conducted its initial due diligence review of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business.

On November 30, 2016, Kirkland distributed a proposed draft of a definitive transaction agreement to Clifford Chance.

Throughout the month of December, representatives of Tronox’s management team, Cristal’s management team and their respective advisors exchanged documents, engaged in telephone conferences and met on various occasions to perform accounting, financial and legal due diligence reviews of the companies, including operational matters and potential synergies from a business combination. In addition, Tronox conducted site visits at key Cristal facilities in the United States, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, Brazil, France, China and Australia. As the diligence investigations continued, Mr. Casey and Dr. Talal spoke periodically, confirming the continued interest of each party in a negotiated transaction.

On January 5, 2017, representatives of Tronox and Cristal, together with Kirkland and Clifford Chance, met at the offices of Kirkland to discuss the structure of the transaction and the proposed terms of the draft transaction agreement.

On January 6, 2017, Kirkland distributed a proposed draft of a shareholders agreement to Clifford Chance.

On January 13, 2017, representatives of Tronox and Cristal, together with their respective tax advisors, Kirkland and Clifford Chance, met at the offices of Clifford Chance to discuss the transaction structure and various tax matters.

On January 18, 2017, representatives of Tronox and Cristal, together with Kirkland and Clifford Chance, met at the offices of Kirkland to discuss and negotiate the draft transaction documents.

On February 7, 2017, representatives of Tronox and Cristal, together with Kirkland and Clifford Chance, met at the offices of Clifford Chance to further discuss and negotiate the draft transaction documents.

On February 14, 2017, the Tronox board of directors met and received an update on the discussions with Cristal. Representatives of Kirkland discussed with the Tronox board of directors its duties with respect to its evaluation of the transaction proposal and reviewed with the Tronox board of directors the terms and conditions of the draft transaction agreement and draft shareholders agreement. Also at this meeting, Credit Suisse reviewed with the Tronox board of directors its financial analysis of the consideration to be paid by Tronox pursuant to the draft transaction agreement. Following discussion, the Tronox board of directors unanimously determined that the proposed terms and conditions of the transaction agreement were advisable to and in the best interests of Tronox and its shareholders, and authorized Tronox management to finalize the transaction agreement and related documentation on such proposed terms and conditions, subject to completion of due diligence. Over the following week, Tronox and its advisors completed their due diligence review of Cristal’s TiO ₂ business.

On February 20, 2017, the Tronox board of directors met and received an update on the discussions with Cristal. Representatives of Kirkland participated by telephone and reviewed with the Tronox board of directors the final terms and conditions of the transaction agreement and shareholders agreement and confirmed the findings of the due diligence investigation. Also at this meeting, representatives of Credit Suisse confirmed to the Tronox board of directors that its financial analysis of the consideration to be paid by Tronox pursuant to the transaction agreement had not changed in any material respect since the meeting of the Tronox board of directors on February 14, 2017 and delivered to the Tronox board of directors an oral opinion, which was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated February 20, 2017, to the effect that, as of such date and subject to the assumptions, qualifications and

limitations set forth in its opinion, the consideration to be paid by Tronox pursuant to the transaction agreement, comprised of $1.673 billion in cash, subject to certain adjustments, and 37,580,000 Tronox Class A shares, was fair, from a financial point of view, to Tronox. Following discussion, the Tronox board of directors unanimously (1) determined that the proposed transaction agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the issuance of Tronox Class A shares in connection with the transaction, were advisable to and in the best interests of Tronox and its shareholders, (2) adopted resolutions approving the proposed transaction agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and (3) recommended, subject to the terms and conditions in the proposed transaction agreement, that Tronox’s shareholders approve the issuance of Class A shares in connection with the transaction and the resulting acquisition of interests in the Class A shares by Cristal Netherlands and certain other persons and entities in the transaction for the purposes of Australia’s takeover laws. The Tronox board of directors authorized the appropriate officers of Tronox to finalize, execute and deliver the transaction agreement and related documentation.

The transaction agreement was finalized and executed in the early morning of February 21, 2017, and the transaction was announced before the opening of trading on the NYSE that morning in a press release issued by Tronox.

Reasons for the Transaction; Recommendation of the Tronox Board of Directors to Approve the Issuance of Class A Shares in the Transaction

In reaching its decision to approve the transaction agreement and recommend the approval of the issuance of Class A Shares in connection with the transaction, the Tronox board of directors consulted with Tronox’s management, as well as with Tronox’s legal and financial advisors, and considered a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the following factors as generally supporting its determination and recommendation:

Tronox’s board of directors weighed the foregoing advantages and benefits against a variety of potentially negative factors, including, but not limited to:

Opinion of Tronox’s Financial Advisor

Tronox retained Credit Suisse to act as its financial advisor in connection with the transaction. On February 20, 2017, at a meeting of the Tronox board of directors held to evaluate the transaction, Credit Suisse rendered to the Tronox board of directors an oral opinion, confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated February 20, 2017, to the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to the various assumptions, procedures, factors, qualifications and limitations set forth in such written opinion, the consideration to be paid by Tronox pursuant to the transaction agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to Tronox.

The full text of Credit Suisse’s written opinion, dated February 20, 2017, to the Tronox board of directors, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken by Credit Suisse in connection with such opinion, is attached to this proxy statement as Annex C and is incorporated into this proxy statement by reference in its entirety. The description of Credit Suisse’s opinion set forth in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Credit Suisse’s opinion. Credit Suisse’s opinion was provided to the Tronox board of directors (in its capacity as such) for its information in connection with its evaluation of the consideration to be paid by Tronox pursuant to the transaction agreement from a financial point of view to Tronox and did not address any other aspect of the transaction, including the relative merits of the transaction as compared to alternative transactions or strategies that might be available to Tronox or the underlying business decision of Tronox to proceed with the transaction. Credit Suisse’s opinion does not constitute advice or a recommendation to any shareholder as to how such shareholder should vote or act on any matter relating to the transaction or otherwise.

In arriving at its opinion, Credit Suisse reviewed a draft of the transaction agreement dated February 19, 2017 and certain publicly available business and financial information relating to the TiO ₂ business and Tronox. Credit Suisse also reviewed certain other information relating to the TiO ₂ business and Tronox provided to Credit Suisse by Cristal and Tronox, including financial forecasts relating to the TiO ₂ business and Tronox, which were provided to or discussed with Credit Suisse by Tronox. Credit Suisse also discussed with the management of each of Cristal and Tronox the businesses and prospects of the TiO ₂ business and Tronox. Credit Suisse also reviewed estimates of the cost savings and other synergies anticipated by the management of Tronox to result from the transaction. Credit Suisse also considered certain financial and stock market data of Tronox and financial data of the TiO ₂ business, and Credit Suisse compared that data with similar data for publicly held companies in businesses it deemed similar to those of the TiO ₂ business and Tronox, respectively, and Credit Suisse considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial terms of certain other completed business combinations and other transactions which have been effected. Credit Suisse also considered such other information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria which it deemed relevant.

In connection with its review, Credit Suisse did not independently verify any of the foregoing information and Credit Suisse assumed and relied on such information being complete and accurate in all material respects. With respect to the financial forecasts and estimates for the TiO ₂ business and Tronox that were provided to Credit Suisse by the management of Tronox and that Credit Suisse used and relied upon at the direction of Tronox for purposes of its analyses, including estimates as to potential net operating loss carryforwards and other potential tax attributes of Tronox, Credit Suisse was advised, and assumed, with the consent of Tronox, that such forecasts and estimates were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of Tronox as to the future financial performance of the TiO ₂ business and Tronox, respectively, and the other matters covered thereby. With respect to the estimates provided to Credit Suisse by the management of Tronox with respect to the cost savings and synergies anticipated to result from the transaction, Credit Suisse was advised by the management of Tronox, and Credit Suisse assumed, that such estimates were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of Tronox as to such cost savings and synergies and that they would be realized in the amounts and the times indicated thereby. Credit Suisse assumed, with the consent of Tronox, that the potential net operating loss carryforwards and other potential tax attributes of Tronox would be used or realized in the amounts and at the times projected by the management of Tronox. Credit Suisse also assumed, with the consent of Tronox, that, in the course of obtaining any regulatory or third-party consents, approvals or agreements in connection with the transaction, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition would be imposed that would have an adverse effect on the TiO ₂ business, Tronox or the contemplated benefits of the transaction and that the transaction would be consummated in accordance with the terms of the transaction agreement without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement thereof. In addition, Credit Suisse was not requested to make, and did not make, an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent

or otherwise) of the TiO ₂ business or Tronox (including, without limitation, the assets being transferred to Tronox in connection with the transaction), nor was Credit Suisse furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. Credit Suisse expressed no view or opinion with respect to the forecasts and estimates for the TiO ₂ business or Tronox, or the estimates of the cost savings or synergies anticipated to result from the transaction or the assumptions upon which they were based. At the direction of the management of Tronox, Credit Suisse further assumed that such forecasts and estimates were a reasonable basis upon which to evaluate the TiO ₂ business, Tronox and the transaction. Credit Suisse also assumed that the final form of the transaction agreement, when executed by the parties thereto, would conform to the draft reviewed by Credit Suisse in all respects material to its analyses.

Credit Suisse’s opinion addressed only the fairness, from a financial point of view, to Tronox of the consideration to be paid by Tronox pursuant to the transaction agreement and did not address any other aspect or implication of the transaction or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in connection with the transaction or otherwise including, without limitation, the fairness of the amount or nature of, or any other aspect relating to, any compensation payable to any officers, directors or employees of any party to the transaction, or class of such persons, relative to the consideration to be paid by Tronox pursuant to the transaction agreement or otherwise. The issuance of Credit Suisse’s opinion was approved by its authorized internal committee.

Credit Suisse’s opinion was necessarily based on information made available to it as of the date of its opinion and upon financial, economic, market and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on that date. Credit Suisse did not express any opinion as to what the value of the Class A Shares actually will be when issued to Cristal Netherlands pursuant to the transaction or the prices at which shares of Tronox stock will trade at any time. Credit Suisse also did not express any opinion as to the value of Tronox’s Alkali business on a standalone basis or the value that Tronox may receive from any potential divestiture of its Alkali business. Credit Suisse’s opinion did not address the relative merits of the transaction as compared to alternative transactions or strategies that might be available to Tronox, nor did it address the underlying business decision of Tronox to proceed with the transaction. Furthermore, Credit Suisse did not express any advice or opinion regarding matters that require legal, regulatory, accounting, insurance, intellectual property, tax, environmental, executive compensation or other similar professional advice. Credit Suisse assumed that Tronox obtained such advice or opinions from the appropriate professional sources.

In preparing its opinion to the Tronox board of directors, Credit Suisse performed a variety of financial and comparative analyses, including those described below. The summary of Credit Suisse’s analyses described below is not a complete description of the analyses underlying Credit Suisse’s opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Credit Suisse arrived at its ultimate opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole and did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any one factor or method of analysis. Accordingly, Credit Suisse believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing on information presented in tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the narrative description of the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying its analyses and opinion.

In its analyses, Credit Suisse considered industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Tronox. No company, business or transaction used for comparative purposes in Credit Suisse’s analyses is identical to Tronox, the TiO ₂ business or the transaction, and an evaluation of the results of those analyses is not entirely mathematical. Rather, the analyses involve complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the public trading or other values of the companies, business segments or transactions analyzed. The estimates contained in Credit Suisse’s analyses and the ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by the analyses. In addition, analyses relating to the value of businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold or acquired. Accordingly, the estimates used in, and the results derived from, Credit Suisse’s analyses are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.

Credit Suisse was not requested to, and it did not, recommend the specific consideration payable in the transaction, which consideration was determined through negotiations between Tronox and Cristal, and the decision to enter into the transaction agreement was solely that of the Tronox board of directors. Credit Suisse’s opinion and

financial analyses were only one of many factors considered by the Tronox board of directors in its evaluation of the transaction and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of the Tronox board of directors or management with respect to the transaction or the consideration to be paid by Tronox pursuant to the transaction agreement.

Summary of the Financial Analyses of Credit Suisse

The following is a summary of the material financial analyses reviewed with the Tronox board of directors on February 20, 2017 in connection with Credit Suisse’s opinion. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand Credit Suisse’s financial analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the data in the tables below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of Credit Suisse’s financial analyses. For the purposes of the summary below, the term “implied transaction consideration” refers to the total implied value of the consideration to be paid by Tronox pursuant to the transaction agreement of $2,193 million, calculated as the sum of (i) the $520 million implied value of the share portion of the transaction consideration, based on the 37.58 million Class A Shares to be issued by Tronox pursuant to the transaction agreement and the closing price of Class A Shares as of February 9, 2017 of $13.84 per share, and (ii) $1,673 million of cash consideration to be paid by Tronox pursuant to the transaction agreement.

Cristal Financial Analyses

Cristal Selected Companies Analysis

Credit Suisse reviewed financial information of the TiO ₂ business and financial and stock market information of Tronox and the following six selected publicly traded companies with operations in whole or in part in the TiO ₂ and/or mineral sands industries which Credit Suisse in its professional judgment considered generally relevant for comparative purposes to the TiO ₂ business and Tronox, and which we refer to as the “selected companies”:

Credit Suisse reviewed, among other things, enterprise values of Tronox and the selected companies, calculated as equity values based on closing stock prices on February 9, 2017, plus debt, non-controlling interests and other adjustments, and less cash and other adjustments, as a multiple of the average earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, for calendar years 2011 through 2016 and the estimated EBITDA for each of calendar years 2017 and 2018. Credit Suisse then applied a selected range of multiples of the average EBITDA for calendar years 2011 through 2016 and multiples of the estimated EBITDA for each of calendar years 2017 and 2018 of 7.0x to 8.0x, 7.0x to 9.0x and 6.0x to 8.0x, respectively, to corresponding data of the TiO ₂ business. Financial data of the selected companies were based on publicly available research analysts’ consensus estimates, public filings and other publicly available information. Financial data of the TiO ₂ business and Tronox were based on public filings and estimates made by Tronox’s management.

The foregoing analysis indicated the following approximate implied enterprise value reference range for the TiO ₂ business, as adjusted for assumed Cristal debt and non-controlling interests, as compared to the implied transaction consideration:

Credit Suisse reviewed, among other things, transaction values, calculated as the purchase prices paid for each target company in the selected transaction, plus debt, non-controlling interests and other adjustments, and less cash and other adjustments, as a multiple of the TiO ₂ production capacity in metric tons of each of the businesses acquired. Credit Suisse then applied a selected range of TiO ₂ production capacity multiples derived from the selected transactions of $1,750 and $4,000 per metric ton to the TiO ₂ production capacity of the TiO ₂ business of 858 metric tons.

The foregoing analysis indicated the following approximate implied enterprise value reference range for the TiO ₂ business, as adjusted for assumed Cristal debt and non-controlling interests, as compared to the implied transaction consideration:

Cristal Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (excluding synergies)

Credit Suisse performed a discounted cash flow analysis of the TiO ₂ business to calculate the estimated present value of the standalone (excluding synergies) unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that the TiO ₂ business was forecasted to generate during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017 through the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021 based on forecasts provided by Tronox’s management. Credit Suisse calculated estimated terminal values of the TiO ₂ business by multiplying the terminal year EBITDA of the TiO ₂ business (calculated as the five-year average of estimated EBITDA for calendar years 2017 through 2021) by a range of selected terminal EBITDA multiples of 6.0x to 8.0x. The present value (as of December 31, 2016) of the cash flows and terminal values were then calculated using discount rates ranging from 8.5% to 10.5%.

The foregoing analysis indicated the following approximate implied enterprise value reference range for the TiO ₂ business, as adjusted for assumed Cristal debt and non-controlling interests, as compared to the implied transaction consideration:

Cristal Synergy Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

Credit Suisse calculated the estimated present value of the potential synergies and integration costs anticipated by Tronox’s management to result from the transaction (which we refer to as the “synergies”) for (i) the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017 and (ii) each full fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 through the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021, based on Tronox management’s financial forecasts for the cost to Tronox to achieve the synergies and the projected savings to Tronox resulting from the synergies. Credit Suisse calculated estimated terminal values of the synergies by multiplying the terminal year value of the synergies (using the estimated 2021 value of the synergies as the terminal year value) by a range of selected multiples of 6.0x to 8.0x. The present value (as of December 31, 2016) of the cash flows and terminal values of the synergies were then calculated using discount rates ranging from 8.5% to 10.5%.

The foregoing analysis indicated the following approximate total value reference ranges for the synergies:

Tronox Financial Analyses

Because a portion of the consideration to be paid by Tronox pursuant to the transaction agreement will consist of Class A Shares, Credit Suisse performed the financial analyses summarized below in order to derive implied Class A Share equity value per share reference ranges for Class A Shares, against which Credit Suisse compared the per share closing price of Class A Shares as of February 9, 2017.

Tronox Selected Companies Analysis

Credit Suisse reviewed financial information of the TiO ₂ business and financial and stock market information of Tronox and the selected companies. Credit Suisse reviewed, among other things, enterprise values of Tronox and the selected companies, calculated as equity values based on closing stock prices on February 9, 2017, plus debt, non-controlling interests and other adjustments, and less cash and other adjustments, as a multiple of the average EBITDA for calendar years 2011 through 2016 and the estimated EBITDA for each of calendar years 2017 and 2018. Credit Suisse then applied a selected range of multiples of the average EBITDA for calendar years 2011 through 2016 and multiples of the estimated EBITDA for each of calendar years 2017 and 2018 of 7.5x to 8.5x, 7.5x to 9.5x and 6.5x to 8.5x, respectively, to corresponding data of Tronox. Financial data of the selected companies were based on publicly available research analysts’ consensus estimates, public filings and other publicly available information. Financial data of the TiO ₂ business and Tronox were based on public filings and estimates of Tronox’s management.

The foregoing analysis indicated the following approximate implied equity value per share reference range for Tronox, as adjusted for Tronox debt, cash and equivalents and non-controlling interests, as compared to the closing price of Class A Shares as of February 9, 2017:

Tronox Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

Credit Suisse performed a discounted cash flow analysis of Tronox to calculate the estimated present value of the standalone unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that Tronox was forecasted to generate during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017 through the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021, based on estimates made by Tronox’s management. Credit Suisse calculated estimated terminal values of Tronox by multiplying the terminal year EBITDA of Tronox (calculated using the five-year average TiO ₂ EBITDA and estimated 2021 EBITDA for the Alkali business) by a range of selected terminal EBITDA multiples of 6.5x to 8.5x. The present value (as of December 31, 2016) of the cash flows and terminal values was then calculated using discount rates ranging from 8.5% to 10.5%.

The foregoing analysis indicated the following approximate implied equity value per share reference range for Tronox, as adjusted for Tronox debt, cash and equivalents and non-controlling interests, as compared to the closing price of Class A Shares as of February 9, 2017:

Other Factors

Credit Suisse also noted for the Tronox board of directors certain additional factors that were not considered in its financial analysis with respect to its opinion, but that were referenced for informational purposes, including, among other things, the following:

Miscellaneous

Tronox selected Credit Suisse to act as its financial advisor in connection with the transaction based on Credit Suisse’s qualifications, experience, reputation and familiarity with Tronox and its business. Credit Suisse is an internationally recognized investment banking firm and is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and securities in connection with mergers and transactions, leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.

Tronox has agreed to pay Credit Suisse for its financial advisory services to Tronox in connection with the proposed transaction an aggregate fee of up to $13 million, of which $2 million was payable upon the delivery of Credit Suisse’s opinion and the remainder is contingent upon completion of the transaction. Credit Suisse and certain of its affiliates expect to provide or arrange financing for the transaction if necessary, for which services Credit Suisse and certain of its affiliates would expect to receive additional compensation that is customary for transactions of this nature in connection with such financing. In addition, Tronox has agreed to reimburse Credit Suisse for certain expenses, including fees and expenses of legal counsel, and to indemnify Credit Suisse and certain related parties for certain liabilities and other items arising out of or related to its engagement. Credit Suisse and its affiliates in the past have provided, currently are providing and may in the future provide investment banking and other financial services to Tronox and its affiliates, for which services Credit Suisse and its affiliates have received and will receive compensation, including acting as (i) financial advisor to Tronox in connection with the pending divestiture of its Alkali business, (ii) financial advisor (and a financing source) to Tronox in connection with its acquisition of FMC Corporation’s Alkali business in 2015 and (iii) joint book-running manager in connection with Tronox’s offering of its 7.5% Senior Notes in 2015. During the past two years, Credit Suisse was paid $12.5 million in the aggregate by Tronox and its affiliates for investment banking services. Credit Suisse and its affiliates may also have provided investment banking and other financial advice and services, and may in the future provide investment banking and financial advice and services, to Cristal and its affiliates for which Credit Suisse and its affiliates have received, and would expect to receive, compensation, including Credit Suisse’s Asset Management Division having provided certain financial services to Gulf Investment Corporation, a shareholder of Cristal, in 2015 and 2016. Credit Suisse is a full-service securities firm engaged in securities trading and brokerage activities as well as providing investment banking and other financial services. In the ordinary course of business, Credit Suisse and its affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for its and its affiliates own accounts and the accounts of customers, equity, debt and other securities and financial instruments (including bank loans and other obligations) of Cristal, Tronox and any other company that may be involved in the transaction, as well as provide investment banking and other financial services to such companies.

Financial Projections

Tronox does not as a matter of course make public projections concerning expected financial performance of Tronox’s business. However, in the course of due diligence in connection with the negotiation of the transaction, Tronox’s management prepared certain non-public financial forecasts with respect to Cristal’s TiO ₂ business, Tronox’s business, certain expected synergies and one-time costs for the years ending December 31, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, which we refer to as the transaction forecasts, and provided such transaction forecasts to its financial advisors. The transaction forecasts include Tronox’s Alkali business and were prepared by Tronox’s management based upon certain internal financial forecasts that are based on reasonable expectations, beliefs, opinions and assumptions of Tronox’s management at the time they were made and are subjective. While the transaction forecasts are being included in this proxy statement, the transaction forecasts were not prepared with a view toward complying with published guidelines established by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of “prospective financial information.” In the view of Tronox’s management, the transaction forecasts were prepared in a manner representative of U.S. GAAP and on a reasonable basis and reflected the best then-currently available estimates and judgments of Tronox’s management. The inclusion of the transaction forecasts in this proxy statement should not be regarded as an indication that Tronox or any other recipient of this information considered, or now considers, this information to be necessarily predictive of actual future results, and does not constitute an admission or representation by any person that such information is material, or that the expectations, beliefs, opinions and assumptions that underlie such transaction forecasts remain the same as of the day of this proxy statement, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the prospective financial information.

The prospective financial information included in this proxy statement has been prepared by, and is the responsibility of, Tronox’s management. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) has neither examined, compiled nor performed any procedures with respect to the prospective financial information contained herein and, accordingly, PwC does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability. PwC assumes no responsibility for and denies any association with the prospective financial information and any other information derived therefrom included elsewhere in this proxy statement.

The PwC report included in this proxy statement refers exclusively to the Company's historical financial information. The PwC report does not cover any other information referred to in this proxy statement and should not be read to do so.

The prospective financial information included in this proxy statement has been prepared by, and is the responsibility of, Tronox’s management. Neither Tronox’s auditors, nor any other independent accountants have examined, compiled or performed any procedures with respect to the prospective financial information contained herein and, accordingly, they do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability and assume no responsibility for and deny any association with the prospective financial information and any other information derived therefrom included elsewhere in this proxy statement.

The auditors’ reports included in this proxy statement refer exclusively to the historical financial information included or incorporated herein. The auditors’ reports do not cover any other information referred to in this proxy statement and should not be read to do so.

All of the financial information contained in this section entitled “Financial Projections” is forward-looking in nature. This information relates to multiple future years and such information by its nature becomes less predictive with each succeeding year. Actual future financial results may materially vary from the forward-looking information presented herein. The following Tronox and Cristal financial information was prepared by Tronox’s management on a U.S. GAAP basis and is based on assumptions, beliefs and opinions at the time made, which Tronox’s management believed to be reasonable at the time, including the following key assumptions:

The transaction forecasts reflect numerous estimates and assumptions made with respect to industry performance, general business, economic, regulatory, market and financial conditions and other future events, as well as matters specific to Tronox’s business and Cristal’s TiO ₂ business, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond Tronox’s and Cristal’s control. These financial forecasts are subject in many respects and thus are susceptible to multiple interpretations and periodic revisions based on actual experience and business developments. As such, these financial forecasts constitute forward-looking statements and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results forecasted in such financial forecasts. For additional information on factors which may cause actual future financial results to materially vary from the information presented, see the sections entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” beginning on pages 19 and 21, respectively.

The following information was included in the transaction forecasts: