CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT II, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland		46-1854011
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4890 West Kennedy Blvd., Suite 650 Tampa, FL 33609		(813) 287-0101
(Address of Principal Executive Offices; Zip Code)		(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Large accelerated filer		¨		Accelerated filer		¨
Non-accelerated filer		þ		Smaller reporting company		¨
				Emerging growth company		þ

---

---

---

PART I

Item 1. Business.

General Description of Business and Operations

Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., or the Company, or we, is a Maryland corporation that was formed on January 11, 2013, and has elected, and currently qualifies, to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or a REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, for federal income tax purposes commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 2014. Substantially all of our business is conducted through Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, or the Operating Partnership, formed on January 10, 2013. The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC, or our Advisor, is the special limited partner of the Operating Partnership.

We were formed to invest primarily in quality income-producing commercial real estate, with a focus on data centers and healthcare properties, preferably with long-term leases to creditworthy tenants, as well as to make other real estate-related investments in such property types, which may include equity or debt interests, including securities, in other real estate entities. We also may originate or invest in real estate-related debt.

We raised the equity capital for our real estate investments through two public offerings, or the Offerings, from May 2014 through November 2018, and we have offered shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP, pursuant to two Registration Statements on Form S-3 (each, a “DRIP Offering” and together the "DRIP Offerings") since November 2017. As of December 31, 2019, we had accepted investors’ subscriptions for and issued approximately 147,707,000 shares of Class A, Class I, Class T and Class T2 common stock in our Offerings, resulting in receipt of gross proceeds of approximately $1,437,115,000, before share repurchases of $87,469,000, selling commissions and dealer manager fees of approximately $96,734,000 and other offering costs of approximately $27,578,000.

As of December 31, 2019, we owned 152 real estate properties, comprising of approximately 8,681,000 rentable square feet of single-tenant and multi-tenant commercial space located in 67 metropolitan statistical areas, or MSA, and two micropolitan statistical areas, or µSA. As of December 31, 2019, the rentable space of these real estate properties was 95.1% leased.

We intend to establish an estimated per share net asset value, or Estimated Per Share NAV on at least an annual basis. Each Estimated Per Share NAV was determined by our board of directors after consultation with our Advisor, and an independent third-party valuation firm. The Estimated Per Share NAV is not subject to audit by our independent registered public accounting firm. The following table outlines the established Estimated Per Share NAV as determined by our board of directors for the last three years as of each valuation date presented below:

Valuation Date		Effective Date		Estimated Per Share NAV
June 30, 2017		October 1, 2017		$9.18
June 30, 2018		October 1, 2018		$9.25
October 31, 2019		December 18, 2019		$8.65

Substantially all of our business is managed by our Advisor. Our Advisor is managed by, and is a subsidiary of, our sponsor, Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC, or our Sponsor. Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC, or our Property Manager, a wholly-owned subsidiary of our Sponsor, serves as our property manager. Our Advisor and our Property Manager received, and will continue to receive, fees during the acquisition and operational stages and our Advisor may be eligible to receive fees during our liquidation stage. SC Distributors, LLC, an affiliate of our Advisor, or our Dealer Manager, served as the dealer manager of our Offerings. The Dealer Manager received fees for services related to our Offerings. We continue to pay the Dealer Manager a distribution and servicing fee with respect to Class T and Class T2 shares that were sold in our Offerings.

Our shares of common stock are not currently listed on a national securities exchange. We may seek to list our shares of common stock for trading on a national securities exchange only if a majority of our independent directors believe listing would be in the best interest of the stockholders. In the event we do not begin the process of achieving a liquidity event on or before the seventh anniversary of the completion or termination of the primary offering of our initial public offering, our charter requires either (a) an amendment to our charter to extend the deadline to begin the process of achieving a liquidity event or (b) the holding of a stockholders meeting to vote on a proposal for an orderly liquidation of our portfolio. A liquidity event could include a sale of all or substantially all our assets, a sale or merger of our company, a listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange (provided we meet the then applicable listing requirements), or other similar transaction.

---

Except as the context otherwise requires, “we,” “our,” “us,” and the “Company” refer to Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., our Operating Partnership and all wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Our principal executive offices are located at 4890 West Kennedy Blvd., Suite 650, Tampa, Florida 33609. Our telephone number is (813) 287-0101 and our website is www.cvmissioncriticalreit2.com.

Merger with Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc.

On April 11, 2019, we, along with Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc., or REIT I, our Operating Partnership, Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP, the operating partnership of REIT I, or the REIT I Operating Partnership, and Lightning Merger Sub, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary, or Merger Sub, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, or the Merger Agreement.

On October 4, 2019, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, REIT I merged with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub surviving the REIT Merger, or the Surviving Entity, such that following the REIT Merger, the Surviving Entity continued as our wholly-owned subsidiary. In accordance with the applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, the separate existence of REIT I ceased. The combined company after the REIT Merger, or the Combined Company, retained the name “Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc.”

The total consideration to REIT I stockholders was $952,768,000, consisting of $178,758,000 in cash and $774,010,000 in equity. Additionally, we paid off REIT I's outstanding debt related to the credit facility in the amount of $248,580,000 at the time of closing of the REIT Merger. In connection with the REIT Merger, we acquired 60 REIT I healthcare properties located in 32 metropolitan statistical areas, or MSAs, encompassing approximately 2,573,000 rentable square feet.

In connection with the REIT Merger, we paid our Advisor an acquisition fee of approximately $24,023,000, which equaled 2.0% of the value of REIT I in the REIT Merger.

Other Key Developments during 2019 and Subsequent

•

On August 7, 2019, in anticipation of the REIT Merger, we and certain of our subsidiaries amended our credit facility with KeyBank National Association as Administrative Agent for the lenders, or the KeyBank Credit Facility, to amend the borrower to us from the Operating Partnership and to increase the maximum commitments available under the KeyBank Credit Facility, or our credit facility, from $700,000,000 to an aggregate of up to $780,000,000, consisting of a $500,000,000 revolving line of credit, with a maturity date of April 27, 2022, subject to our right to one, 12-month extension period, and a $280,000,000 term loan, with a maturity date of April 27, 2023. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we increased the borrowing base availability under our credit facility by $603,675,000, by adding 64 healthcare properties and one data center property to the aggregate pool availability.

•

On August 7, 2019, we and certain of our subsidiaries entered into an agreement with KeyBank National Association as Administrative Agent for the lenders, to obtain a senior unsecured term loan, or the Term Loan, for the maximum commitment available of up to $520,000,000 with a maturity date of December 31, 2024. Subject to certain conditions, the Term Loan can be increased to $600,000,000 any time before December 31, 2023. The Term Loan was funded upon the consummation of the REIT Merger on October 4, 2019.

•

In connection with the REIT Merger, on October 2, 2019, our board of directors approved an amended share repurchase program, or the Amended SRP. The Amended SRP applies to all eligible stockholders, beginning with repurchases made on the first quarter repurchase date of 2020, which was January 30, 2020. For purposes of determining whether any former REIT I stockholder qualifies for participation under the Amended SRP, former REIT I stockholders received full credit for the time they held REIT I common stock prior to the closing of the REIT Merger.

•	On December 17, 2019, our board of directors established the Estimated Per Share NAV of $8.65, effective December 18, 2019.

•

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we repurchased 2,557,298 Class A shares, Class I shares, Class T shares and Class T2 shares of common stock (1,910,894 Class A shares, 189,947 Class I shares, 451,058 Class T shares and 5,399 Class T2 shares), or 1.87% of shares outstanding as of December 31, 2018, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $23,655,000 (an average of $9.25 per share).

•	During the year ended December 31, 2019, we purchased 67 properties, inclusive of 60 properties acquired in the REIT Merger, comprising approximately 2,874,000 of rentable square feet for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1,301,630,000.

•	During the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold one of three buildings and a portion of land related to one healthcare property for an aggregate sale price of $3,106,000 and generated net proceeds of $2,882,000.

---

•	As of March 24, 2020, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, owned 153 real estate properties, for an aggregate purchase price of $3,134,875,000 and comprising of approximately 8,696,000 rentable square feet of commercial space.

•	As of March 24, 2020, we had a $1,003,000,000 outstanding principal balance under our credit facility.

Investment Objectives and Policies

Our primary investment objectives are to:

•	acquire well-maintained and strategically-located, quality, mission critical real estate investments in high-growth sectors of the U.S. economy, including the data center and healthcare sectors, which provide current cash flow from operations;

•	pay regular cash distributions to stockholders;

•	preserve, protect and return capital contributions to stockholders;

•	realize appreciated growth in the value of our investments upon the sale of such investments in whole or in part; and

•	be prudent, patient and deliberate with respect to the purchase and sale of our investments considering current and future real estate markets.

We cannot assure stockholders that we will attain these objectives or that the value of our assets will not decrease. Furthermore, within our investment objectives and policies, our Advisor has substantial discretion with respect to the selection of specific investments and the purchase and sale of our assets, subject to the approval of our board of directors. Our board of directors may revise our investment objectives and policies if it determines it is advisable and in the best interest of our stockholders.

Investment Strategy

We focus our investment activities on acquiring mission critical net-leased properties that are primarily in the data center and healthcare sectors. We expect that most of our properties will continue to be located throughout the continental United States; however, we may purchase properties in other jurisdictions. We may also invest in real estate-related debt and securities that meet our investment strategy and return criteria, provided that we do not intend for such investments to constitute a significant portion of our assets, and we will evaluate our assets to ensure that any such investments do not cause us to fail to maintain our REIT status, cause us or any of our subsidiaries to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the Investment Company Act, or cause our Advisor to have assets under management that would require our Advisor to register as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, or the Advisers Act.

We seek to obtain investments that are (i) essential to the successful business operations of the tenant, or “mission critical”; (ii) leased to creditworthy and investment grade tenants, preferably on a net-leased basis; long-term leases, preferably with terms of six years or longer, which typically include annual or periodic fixed rental increases; and located in geographically diverse, established markets with superior access and visibility.

As determined appropriate by our Advisor, we may acquire properties in various stages of development or that require substantial refurbishment or renovation. Our Advisor will make this determination based upon a variety of factors, including the available risk-adjusted returns for such properties when compared with other available properties, the effect such properties would have on the diversification of our portfolio, and our investment objectives of realizing both current income and capital appreciation upon the sale of such properties.

To the extent feasible, we will continue to seek to achieve a well-balanced portfolio of real estate investments that is diversified by geographic location, age and lease maturities. We also will focus on acquiring properties in the high-growth data center and healthcare sectors. We expect that tenants of our properties will be diversified between national, regional and local companies.

Creditworthy Tenants

We expect many of the tenants of our properties to be creditworthy national or regional companies with high net worth and high operating income.

A tenant is considered creditworthy if it has a financial profile that our Advisor believes meets our criteria. In evaluating the creditworthiness of a tenant or prospective tenant, our Advisor will not use specific quantifiable standards, but will consider many factors, including, but not limited to, the proposed terms of the property acquisition, the financial condition of the tenant and/or guarantor, the operating history of the property with the tenant, the tenant’s market share and track record within its

---

industry segment, the general health and outlook of the tenant’s industry segment, and the lease length and other lease terms at the time of the property acquisition.

We monitor the credit of our tenants to stay abreast of any material changes in credit quality. We monitor tenant credit by (1) reviewing the credit ratings of tenants (or their parent companies) that are rated by nationally recognized rating agencies, (2) reviewing financial statements that are publicly available or that are required to be delivered to us under the applicable lease, (3) monitoring news reports and other available information regarding our tenants and their underlying businesses, (4) monitoring the timeliness of rent collections, and (5) conducting periodic inspections of our properties to ascertain proper maintenance, repair and upkeep. As of December 31, 2019, we had two tenants that experienced a deterioration in their creditworthiness since December 31, 2018.

Description of Leases

We generally acquire properties subject to existing tenant leases. When spaces in properties become vacant, existing leases expire, or we acquire properties under development or requiring substantial refurbishment or renovation, we anticipate entering into net leases. Net leases typically require tenants to pay, in addition to a fixed rent, all or a majority of the costs relating to the three broad expense categories of real estate taxes (including special assessments and sales and use taxes), insurance and common area maintenance (including repair and maintenance, utilities, cleaning and other operating expenses related to the property), excluding the roof and structure of the property. Generally, the leases require each tenant to procure, at its own expense, commercial general liability insurance, as well as property insurance covering the building for the full replacement value and naming the ownership entity and the lender, if applicable, as the additional insured on the policy. As a precautionary measure, we may obtain, to the extent available, secondary liability insurance, as well as loss of rents insurance. Tenants will be required to provide proof of insurance by furnishing a certificate of insurance to our Advisor on an annual basis. With respect to multi-tenant properties, we expect to have a variety of lease arrangements with the tenants of these properties. Since each lease is an individually negotiated contract between two or more parties, each lease will have different obligations of both the landlord and tenant. Many large national tenants have standard lease forms that generally do not vary from property to property. We will have limited ability to revise the terms of leases to those tenants. We expect that multi-tenant properties may be subject to "gross" or "modified gross" leases. "Gross" leases require the tenant to pay a fixed rental amount inclusive of all of the tenant's operating expenses. Any operating expenses not covered by the tenant's rental amount are the responsibility of the landlord (including any operating expense increases in subsequent years). "Modified gross" leases typically require the tenant to pay, in addition to a fixed rental, a portion of the operating expenses of the property.

A majority of our acquisitions generally have lease terms of six years or longer at the time of the property acquisition. As of December 31, 2019, the weighted average remaining lease term of our properties was 10.1 years. Under most commercial leases, tenants are obligated to pay a predetermined annual base rent. Some of the leases also will contain provisions that increase the amount of base rent at points during the lease term.

Investment Decisions

Our Advisor may purchase on our account, without the specific prior approval of our board of directors, properties with a purchase price of less than $15,000,000, so long as the investment in the property would not, if consummated, violate our investment guidelines or any restrictions on indebtedness and the consideration to be paid for such properties does not exceed the fair market value of such properties. Where the purchase price is equal to or greater than $15,000,000, investment decisions will be made by our board of directors upon the recommendation of our Advisor.

In evaluating and presenting investments for approval, our Advisor, to the extent such information is available, considers and provides to our board of directors, with respect to each property, the following:

•	proposed purchase price, terms and conditions;

•	physical condition, age, curb appeal and environmental reports;

•	location, visibility and access;

•	historical financial performance;

•	tenant rent roll and tenant creditworthiness;

•	lease terms, including rent, rent increases, length of lease term, specific tenant and landlord responsibilities, renewal, expansion, termination, purchase options, exclusive and permitted uses provisions, assignment and sublease provisions, and co-tenancy requirements;

•	local market economic conditions, demographics and population growth patterns;

•	neighboring properties; and

•	potential for new property construction in the area.

---

Investing in and Originating Loans

Our criteria for originating or acquiring loans are substantially the same as those involved in our investment in properties. We may invest in mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans. Further, we may invest in unsecured loans or loans secured by assets other than real estate; however, we will not make unsecured loans or loans not secured by mortgages unless such loans are approved by a majority of our independent directors.

Our underwriting process typically involves comprehensive financial, structural, operational and legal due diligence. We do not require an appraisal of the underlying property from a certified independent appraiser for an investment in mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans, except for investments in transactions with our directors, our Advisor or any of their affiliates.

We will not make or invest in mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans on any one property if the aggregate amount of all mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans outstanding on the property, including our borrowings, would exceed an amount equal to 85% of the appraised value of the property, as determined by our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, unless substantial justification exists, as determined by our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors. Our board of directors may find such justification in connection with the purchase of mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans in cases in which it believes there is a high probability of our foreclosure upon the property or we intend to foreclose upon the property in order to acquire the underlying assets and, in respect of transactions with our affiliates, in which the cost of the mortgage loan investment does not exceed the appraised value of the underlying property.

We may originate loans from mortgage brokers or personal solicitations of suitable borrowers, or we may purchase existing loans that were originated by other lenders. Our Advisor will evaluate all potential loan investments to determine if the term of the loan, the security for the loan and the loan-to-value ratio meet our investment criteria and objectives.

Investing in Real Estate Securities

We may invest in non-majority owned securities of both publicly-traded and private companies primarily engaged in real estate businesses, including REITs and other real estate operating companies, and securities issued by pass-through entities of which substantially all of the assets consist of qualifying assets or real estate-related assets. We may purchase the common stock, preferred stock, debt, or other securities of these entities or options to acquire such securities. However, any investment in equity securities (including any preferred equity securities) must be approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction, as being fair, competitive and commercially reasonable.

Acquisition Structure

We have and expect to continue to acquire fee interests in properties (a fee interest is the absolute, legal possession and ownership of land, property, or rights), although other methods of acquiring a property may be utilized if we deem them to be advantageous.

To achieve our investment objectives, and to further diversify our portfolio, we have invested and will continue to invest in properties using a number of acquisition structures, which could include direct and indirect acquisitions, joint ventures, leveraged investments, issuing units in our Operating Partnership in exchange for properties and making mortgages or other loans secured by the same types of properties which we may acquire. Further, our Advisor and its affiliates may purchase properties in their own name, assume loans in connection with the purchase or loan and temporarily hold title to the properties for the purpose of facilitating acquisition or financing by us or any other purpose related to our business.

Joint Ventures

We may enter into joint ventures, partnerships and other co-ownership partnerships for the purpose of making investments. Some of the potential reasons to enter into a joint venture would be to acquire assets we could not otherwise acquire, to reduce our capital commitment to a particular asset, or to benefit from certain expertise a partner might have. In determining whether to invest in a particular joint venture, we evaluate the assets of the joint venture under the same criteria described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the selection of our investments. In the case of a joint venture, we also evaluate the terms of the joint venture as well as the financial condition, operating capabilities and integrity of our partner or partners. We may enter into joint ventures with our directors and our Advisor (or its affiliates) only if a majority of our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction, approves the transaction as being fair and reasonable to us and on substantially the same terms and conditions as those received by the other joint venturers.

Disposition Policy

We intend to hold each asset we acquire for an extended period of time, generally five to seven years, or for the life of the Company. However, circumstances may arise that could result in the earlier sale of some assets. The determination of whether an asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of will be made after consideration of relevant factors, including prevailing

---

economic conditions, specific real estate market conditions, tax implications for our stockholders, and other factors. The requirements for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes also will put some limits on our ability to sell assets after short holding periods.

The sale price of a property that is net-leased will be determined in large part by the amount of rent payable under the lease and the capitalization rate applied to that rent. If a tenant has a repurchase option at a formula price, we may be limited in realizing any appreciation. In connection with our sales of properties, we may lend the purchaser all or a portion of the purchase price. In these instances, our taxable income may exceed the cash received in the sale. The terms of payment will be affected by custom in the area in which the property being sold is located and the then-prevailing economic conditions.

Qualification as a REIT

We elected, and currently qualify, to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2014. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to currently distribute at least 90.0% of our REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain, to our stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders.

If we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT in any taxable year, we would then be subject to federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and would not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could have a material adverse effect on our net income and net cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Financing Strategy and Policies

We believe that utilizing borrowing is consistent with our investment objectives and has the potential to maximize returns to our stockholders. Financing for acquisitions and investments may be obtained at the time an asset is acquired or an investment is made or at a later time. In addition, debt financing may be used from time to time for property improvements, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and other working capital needs. The form of our indebtedness will vary and could be long-term or short-term, secured or unsecured, or fixed-rate or floating rate. We will not enter into interest rate swaps or caps, or similar hedging transactions or derivative arrangements for speculative purposes, but may do so in order to manage or mitigate our interest rate risk on variable rate debt. We intend to limit our aggregate borrowings to 50% of the fair market value of our assets, unless excess borrowing is approved by a majority of our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors.

Distribution Policy

The amount of distributions we pay to our stockholders is determined by our board of directors and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for payment of distributions, our financial condition, capital expenditure requirements, annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our status as a REIT under the Code and restrictions imposed by our organizational documents and Maryland law.

We currently pay, and intend to continue to pay, monthly distributions to our stockholders. Because all of our operations are performed indirectly through our Operating Partnership, our ability to continue to pay distributions depends on our Operating Partnership’s ability to pay distributions to its partners, including to us. If we do not have enough cash from operations to fund distributions, we may borrow, issue additional securities or sell assets in order to fund distributions, or make distributions out of net proceeds from our Offerings. We have paid, and may continue to pay, distributions from sources other than from our cash flows from operations. Subject to certain exceptions, there is no limit to the amount of distributions that we may pay from our Offering proceeds.

In accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law, we may not make distributions that would: (1) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; (2) cause our total assets to be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences, if any; or (3) jeopardize our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

To the extent that distributions to our stockholders are paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, such distributions are taxable as ordinary income. To the extent that our distributions exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits, such amounts constitute a return of capital to our stockholders for federal income tax purposes, to the extent of their basis in their stock, and thereafter will constitute capital gain. All or a portion of a distribution to stockholders may be paid from net offering proceeds and thus, will constitute a return of capital to our stockholders.

---

See Part II, Item 5. "Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities—Distributions," for further discussion on distribution rates approved by our board of directors.

Conflicts of Interest

We are subject to various conflicts of interest arising out of our relationship with our Advisor, and its affiliates, including conflicts related to the arrangements pursuant to which our Advisor and its affiliates will be compensated by us. See Item 1A- “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest.”

Employees

We have no direct employees. The employees of our Advisor and its affiliates provide services for us related to acquisition, property management, asset management, accounting, investor relations, and all other administrative services.

We are dependent on our Advisor and its affiliates for services that are essential to us, including asset acquisition decisions, property management and other general and administrative responsibilities. In the event that these companies are unable to provide these services to us, we would be required to obtain such services from other sources.

Reportable Segments

We operate through two reportable business segments – commercial real estate investments in data centers and healthcare. See Note 12—"Segment Reporting" to the consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Insurance

See the section captioned “—Description of Leases” above.

Competition

As we continue to purchase properties for our portfolio, we are in competition with other potential buyers for the same properties, and may have to pay more to purchase the property than if there were no other potential acquirers or we may have to locate another property that meets our investment criteria. Although we generally acquire properties subject to existing leases, the leasing of real estate is highly competitive in the current market, and we may experience competition for tenants from owners and managers of competing projects. As a result, we may have to provide free rent, incur charges for tenant improvements, or offer other inducements, or we might not be able to timely lease the space, all of which may have an adverse impact on our results of operations. At the time we elect to dispose of our properties, we will also be in competition with sellers of similar properties to locate suitable purchasers for our properties.

Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Leases

As of December 31, 2019, we had cash on deposit, including restricted cash and escrowed funds, in certain financial institutions that had deposits in excess of current federally insured levels. We limit cash investments to financial institutions with high credit standing; therefore, we believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on our cash deposits. To date, we have not experienced any loss of or lack of access to cash in our accounts.

The following table shows the segment diversification of our real estate properties based on rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019:

Industry		Total Number of Leases			Leased Sq Ft			2019 Rental Revenue (in thousands)(1)				Percentage of 2019 Rental Revenue
Data Centers		69			3,160,184			$	109,689			52.0	%
Healthcare		136			5,097,731			101,212				48.0	%
		205			8,257,915			$	210,901			100.0	%

(1)	Based on the total rental revenue recognized and reported in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

---

Based on leases of our properties in effect as of December 31, 2019, the following table shows the geographic diversification of our real estate properties that accounted for 10% or more of our rental revenue as of December 31, 2019:

Location		Total Number of Leases			Leased Sq Ft			2019 Rental Revenue (in thousands)(1)				Percentage of 2019 Rental Revenue
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA		32			964,062			$	31,595			15.0	%

(1)	Based on the total rental revenue recognized and reported in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

As of December 31, 2019, we had no exposure to tenant concentration that accounted for 10.0% or more of rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Environmental Matters

All real properties and the operations conducted on real properties are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. In connection with ownership and operation of real estate, we may be potentially liable for costs and damages related to environmental matters. We intend to take commercially reasonable steps to protect ourselves from the impact of these laws, including obtaining environmental assessments of all properties that we acquire. We also carry environmental liability insurance on our properties, which provides coverage for pollution liability, for third-party bodily injury and property damage claims.

Available Information

We electronically file our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports with the SEC. We have also filed our Registration Statement on Form S-11, amendments to our Registration Statement and supplements to our prospectus in connection with our Offerings with the SEC. Copies of our filings with the SEC may be obtained from the SEC’s website, http://www.sec.gov. Access to these filings is free of charge. In addition, we make certain materials that are electronically filed with the SEC available at www.cvmissioncriticalreit2.com as soon as reasonably practicable. They are also available for printing by any stockholder upon request.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The factors described below represent our principal risks. Other factors may exist that we do not consider to be significant based on information that is currently available or that we are not currently able to anticipate.

Risks Related to an Investment in Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc.

The prior performance of real estate investment programs sponsored by affiliates of our Advisor may not be an indication of our future results.

Our stockholders should not rely upon the past performance of other real estate investment programs sponsored by affiliates of our Advisor to predict our future results. Although members of our Advisor’s management have significant experience in the acquisition, finance, management and development of commercial real estate, the prior performance of real estate investment programs sponsored by the members of our advisor's management team and other affiliates of our Advisor may not be indicative of our future results.

We may not succeed in achieving our goals, and our failure to do so could cause our stockholders to lose all or a portion of their investment.

We currently have not identified all of the properties we may purchase with net proceeds from our Offerings. For this and other reasons, an investment in our shares is speculative.

We have not identified all of the properties we may purchase. Additionally, we will not provide stockholders with information to evaluate our investments prior to our acquisition of properties. We have established policies relating to the types of assets we will acquire and the creditworthiness of tenants of our properties, but our advisor has wide discretion in implementing these policies, subject to the oversight of our board of directors. As a result, you will not be able to evaluate the economic merit of our future acquisitions until after such acquisitions have been made. Therefore, an investment in our shares is speculative.

---

Table of Contents

Our shares of common stock will not be listed on an exchange for the foreseeable future, if ever, and we are not required to provide for a liquidity event. Therefore, it may be difficult for stockholders to sell their shares and, if stockholders are able to sell their shares, they will likely sell them at a substantial discount. Our stockholders are also limited in their ability to sell their shares pursuant to our share repurchase program and may have to hold their shares for an indefinite period of time.

There is currently no public market for our shares and there may never be one. In addition, although we presently intend to consider alternatives for providing liquidity to our stockholders no later than five to seven years after the termination of the primary offering of our initial public offering, we do not have a fixed date or method for providing stockholders with liquidity, and our completion of a liquidity event is not guaranteed. If we do not pursue a liquidity transaction, or delay such a transaction due to market conditions, shares may continue to be illiquid and stockholders may, for an indefinite period of time, be unable to convert their investment to cash easily and could suffer losses on their investment.

If our stockholders are able to find a buyer for their shares, our stockholders likely will have to sell them at a substantial discount to their purchase price. Moreover, investors should not rely on our share repurchase program as a method to sell shares promptly because our share repurchase program includes numerous restrictions that limit stockholders' ability to sell shares to us, and our board of directors may suspend (in whole or in part) the share repurchase program at any time, and may amend, reduce or terminate our share repurchase program upon 30 days' prior notice to our stockholders for any reason it deems appropriate. The restrictions of our share repurchase program limit our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares should they require liquidity and limit our stockholders’ ability to recover the value they invested. We limited our share repurchase program to only death, disability and exigent circumstance effective May 11, 2019 in connection with the announcement of the then-pending REIT Merger. On October 2, 2019 our board of directors amended and restated our share repurchase program so that all eligible stockholders may request their shares be repurchased in accordance with the share repurchase program. See Part II, Item 5. "Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities" for more information on the limitations of our share repurchase program.

We may suffer from delays in locating suitable investments, which could adversely affect our ability to make distributions and the value of our stockholders’ investment.

We may suffer from delays in locating suitable investments. Delays we encounter in the selection, acquisition and, if we develop properties, development of income-producing properties, likely would adversely affect our NAV, our ability to make distributions and the value of our stockholders’ overall returns.

The Estimated Per Share NAV of each of our Class A common stock, Class I common stock, Class T common stock and Class T2 common stock is an estimate as of a given point in time and may not reflect the value that stockholders will receive for their investment.

The Estimated Per Share NAV of each of our Class A common stock, Class I common stock, Class T common stock and Class T2 common stock as of October 31, 2019, was determined by our board of directors on December 17, 2019.

The Estimated Per Share NAV was determined after consultation with the Advisor and Robert A. Stanger & Co, Inc., an independent third-party valuation firm, the engagement of which was approved by the Audit Committee. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, rules provide no guidance on the methodology an issuer must use to determine its estimated value per share. As with any valuation methodology, our independent valuation firm's methodology is based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not be accurate or complete. Different parties with different assumptions and estimates could derive a different estimated value per share, and these differences could be significant. The Estimated Per Share NAV is not audited and does not represent the fair value of our assets or liabilities according to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States on America, or GAAP. Accordingly, with respect to the Estimated Per Share NAV, we can give no assurance that:

•	a stockholder would be able to resell his or her shares at the Estimated Per Share NAV;

•	a stockholder would ultimately realize distributions per share equal to the Estimated Per Share NAV upon liquidation of our assets and settlement of our liabilities or a sale of the company;

•	our shares of common stock would trade at the Estimated Per Share NAV on a national securities exchange;

•	an independent third-party appraiser or other third-party valuation firm would agree with the Estimated Per Share NAV; or

•	the methodology used to estimate our NAV per share would be acceptable to FINRA or comply with ERISA reporting requirements.

Further, the Estimated Per Share NAV is based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities divided by the number of shares outstanding, calculated as of October 31, 2019. The value of our shares will fluctuate over time in response to developments related to individual assets in the portfolio and the management of those assets and in

10

---

Table of Contents

response to the real estate and finance markets. We expect to engage an independent valuation firm to update the Estimated Per Share NAV at least annually.

For a full description of the methodologies used to value our assets and liabilities in connection with the calculation of the Estimated Per Share NAV, see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 19, 2019.

It may be difficult to accurately reflect material events that may impact our Estimated Per Share NAV between valuations, and accordingly we may be selling and repurchasing shares at too high or too low a price.

Our independent third-party valuation expert will calculate estimates of the market value of our principal real estate and real estate-related assets, and our board of directors will determine the net value of our real estate and real estate-related assets and liabilities taking into consideration such estimates provided by the independent third-party valuation expert. Our board of directors is ultimately responsible for determining the Estimated Per Share NAV. Since our board of directors will determine our Estimated per share NAV at least annually, there may be changes in the value of our properties that are not fully reflected in the most recent Estimated Per Share NAV. As a result, the published Estimated Per Share NAV may not fully reflect changes in value that may have occurred since the prior valuation. Furthermore, our advisor will monitor our portfolio, but it may be difficult to reflect changing market conditions or material events that may impact the value of our portfolio between valuations, or to obtain timely or complete information regarding any such events. Therefore, the Estimated Per Share NAV published before the announcement of an extraordinary event may differ significantly from our actual per share NAV until such time as sufficient information is available and analyzed, the financial impact is fully evaluated, and the appropriate adjustment is made to our Estimated Per Share NAV, as determined by our board of directors. Any resulting potential disparity in our NAV may inure to the benefit of redeeming stockholders or non-redeeming stockholders and purchasers of our common stock, depending on whether our published Estimated Per Share NAV for such class is overstated or understated.

We expect that most of our properties will continue to be located in the continental United States and would be affected by economic downturns, as well as economic cycles and risks inherent to that area.

We expect to continue to acquire commercial real estate located in the continental United States; however, we may purchase properties in other jurisdictions. Real estate markets are subject to economic downturns, as they have been in the past, and we cannot predict how economic conditions will impact this market in both the short and long term. Declines in the economy or a decline in the real estate market in the continental United States could hurt our financial performance and the value of our properties. The factors affecting economic conditions in the continental United States include, but are not limited to:

•	financial performance and productivity of the publishing, advertising, financial, technology, retail, insurance and real estate industries;

•	business layoffs or downsizing;

•	industry slowdowns;

•	relocations of businesses;

•	changing demographics;

•	increased telecommuting and use of alternative workplaces;

•	infrastructure quality;

•	any oversupply of, or reduced demand for, real estate;

•	concessions or reduced rental rates under new leases for properties where tenants defaulted;

•	increased insurance premiums; and

•	increased interest rates.

Distributions paid from sources other than our cash flows from operations, including from the proceeds of our Offerings, will result in us having fewer funds available for the acquisition of properties and real estate-related investments, which may adversely affect our ability to fund future distributions with cash flows from operations and may adversely affect a stockholder's overall return.

We have paid, and may continue to pay, distributions from sources other than from our cash flows from operations. For the year ended December 31, 2019, our cash flows provided by operations of approximately $80.1 million was a shortfall of approximately $9.3 million, or 10.4%, of our distributions paid (total distributions were approximately $89.4 million, of which $49.5 million was cash and $39.9 million was reinvested in shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP) during such period and such shortfall was paid from proceeds from our DRIP Offering. For the year ended December 31, 2018, our cash flows provided by operations of approximately $74.2 million was a shortfall of approximately $7.0 million, or 8.6% of our

11

---

Table of Contents

distributions paid (total distributions were approximately $81.2 million, of which $40.3 million was cash and $40.9 million was reinvested in shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP) during such period and such shortfall was paid from proceeds from our DRIP Offering.

We may pay, and have no limits on the amounts we may pay, distributions from any source, such as from borrowings, the sale of assets, the sale of additional securities, advances from our Advisor, our Advisor’s deferral, suspension and/or waiver of its fees and expense reimbursements. Funding distributions from borrowings could restrict the amount we can borrow for investments, which may affect our profitability. Funding distributions from the sale of assets may affect our ability to generate cash flows. Funding distributions from the sale of additional securities could dilute stockholders' interest in us if we sell shares of our common stock to third party investors. As a result, the return investors may realize on their investment may be reduced and investors who invested in us before we generated significant cash flow may realize a lower rate of return than later investors. Payment of distributions from any of the aforementioned sources could restrict our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations, affect our profitability and/or affect the distributions payable upon a liquidity event, any or all of which may have an adverse effect on an investment in us.

We have experienced losses in the past, and we may experience additional losses in the future.

Historically, we have experienced net losses and we may not be profitable or realize growth in the value of our investments. Many of our losses can be attributed to operating costs incurred prior to purchasing properties or making other investments that generate revenue and impairment related expenses. For further discussion of our operational history and the factors affecting our losses, see the “Selected Financial Data” section of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section and our consolidated financial statements and the notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of our operational history and the factors for our losses.

A high concentration of our properties in a particular geographic area, or of tenants in a similar industry, would magnify the effects of downturns in that geographic area or industry.

As of December 31, 2019, we owned 152 properties, located in 67 MSAs, and two µSAs, one of which accounted for 10.0% or more of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019. Properties located in the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, Georgia MSA accounted for 15.0% of our rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019. There is a geographic concentration of risk subject to fluctuations in each MSA’s economy. Geographic concentration of our properties exposes us to economic downturns in the areas where our properties are located. A regional or local recession in any of these areas could adversely affect our ability to generate or increase operating revenues, attract new tenants or dispose of unproductive properties. Similarly, if tenants of our properties become concentrated in a certain industry or industries, any adverse effect to that industry generally would have a disproportionately adverse effect on our portfolio.

As of December 31, 2019, we had no exposure to tenant concentration that accounted for 10.0% or more of rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019.

If our Advisor loses or is unable to obtain key personnel, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered, which could adversely affect our ability to make distributions and the value of our stockholders’ investment.

Our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of certain of our executive officers and other key personnel of our Advisor, including Michael A. Seton and Kay C. Neely, who would be difficult to replace. Our Advisor does not have an employment agreement with any of these key personnel and we cannot guarantee that all, or any particular one, will remain affiliated with us and/or our Advisor. If any of our key personnel were to cease their affiliation with our Advisor, our operating results could suffer. Further, we do not currently intend to separately maintain key person life insurance on Michael A. Seton and Kay C. Neely or any other person. We believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon our Advisor’s ability to hire and retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot assure our stockholders that our Advisor will be successful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel. If our Advisor loses or is unable to obtain the services of key personnel, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered, and the value of our stockholders’ investment may decline.

Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to recover claims against our officers, directors and our Advisor are limited, which could reduce our stockholders’ and our recovery against them if they cause us to incur losses.

Maryland law provides that a director has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in the corporation’s best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. In addition, subject to certain limitations set forth therein or under Maryland law, our charter provides that no director or officer will be liable to us or our stockholders for money damages, requires us to indemnify and advance expenses to our directors, officers and Advisor and our Advisor’s affiliates and permits us, with approval of our board of directors or a committee of the board of directors' to indemnify our employees and agents. Although our charter does not allow us to indemnify or hold harmless an indemnitee to a greater extent than permitted under

12

---

Table of Contents

Maryland law and the North American Securities Administrators Association REIT Guidelines, or the NASAA REIT Guidelines, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors, officers, employees and agents, and our Advisor and its affiliates than might otherwise exist under common law, which could reduce our stockholders’ and our ability to recover against them. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors, officers, employees and agents or our Advisor and its affiliates in some cases, which would decrease the cash otherwise available for distribution to stockholders.

The failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could reduce the amount of cash we have available to pay distributions, make additional investments and service our debt.

We currently have cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash deposited in certain financial institutions in excess of federally insurable levels. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation only insures interest-bearing accounts in amounts up to $250,000 per depositor per insured bank. While we monitor our cash balance in our operating accounts, if any of the banking institutions in which we deposit funds ultimately fails, we may lose our deposits over $250,000. The loss of our deposits may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents may adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.

A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. These incidents may be an intentional attack or an unintentional event and could involve gaining unauthorized access to our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption. The result of these incidents may include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation and damage to our tenant and investor relationships. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those we have outsourced. There is no guarantee that any processes, procedures and internal controls we have implemented or will implement will prevent cyber intrusions, which could have a negative impact on our financial results, operations, business relationships or confidential information.

Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest

We are subject to conflicts of interest arising out of our relationships with our Advisor and its affiliates, including the material conflicts discussed below. See the “Conflicts of Interest” section of Part I, Item I. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our Advisor and its affiliates, including officers and some of our directors, face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements, which could result in actions that are not in the best interest of our stockholders.

Our Advisor and its affiliates receive substantial fees from us in return for their services and these fees could influence the advice provided to us. Among other matters, the compensation arrangements could affect our Advisor’s judgment with respect to, but not limited to, the following: (i) real estate acquisitions, which allow our Advisor to earn acquisition fees upon repurchases of assets and to increase asset management fees; (ii) real estate asset sales, since the asset management fees payable to our Advisor would decrease and our Advisor would be entitled to a disposition fee upon sales; and (iii) whether and when we seek to list our common stock on a national securities exchange, which would entitle our Advisor, as a special limited partner of our Operating Partnership, to have its interests in our Operating Partnership redeemed. These fees may incentive our Advisor to recommend transactions that may not be in our best interest at the time, and our Advisor will have considerable discretion with respect to the terms of any acquisition, disposition or leasing transaction.

The fees we pay our Advisor and its affiliates were not determined on an arm’s-length basis; therefore, we do not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties.

The fees to be paid to our Advisor, our Property Manager and other affiliates for services they provide for us were not determined on an arm’s-length basis. As a result, the fees have been determined without the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties and could be in excess of amounts that we would otherwise pay to third parties for such services.

The time and resources that affiliates of our Sponsor devote to us may be diverted, and we may face additional competition due to the fact that affiliates of our Sponsor are not prohibited from raising money for, or managing, another entity that makes the same types of investments we target.

Affiliates of our Sponsor are not prohibited from raising money for, or managing, another investment entity that makes the same types of investments as those we target. As a result, the time and resources they could devote to us may be diverted to other investment activities. We could compete with affiliates of our Advisor for the same investment opportunities and

13

---

Table of Contents

investors. We may also co-invest with any such affiliate. Even though all co-investments are subject to approval by our independent directors, they could be on terms not as favorable to us as those we could achieve co-investing with a third-party.

Our officers and directors face conflicts of interest related to the positions they hold with affiliated entities, which could hinder our ability to successfully implement our business strategy and generate returns to our stockholders.

Certain of our executive officers and directors, including Michael A. Seton, Kay C. Neely and John E. Carter, who serves as the chairman of our board of directors, also are officers and/or directors of our Advisor, our Property Manager, and/or other affiliated entities. As a result, these individuals owe fiduciary duties to these other entities and their stockholders and limited partners, which fiduciary duties may conflict with the duties that they owe to us and our stockholders. Their loyalties to these other entities could result in actions or inactions that are detrimental to our business, which could harm the implementation of our business strategy and our investment and leasing opportunities. Conflicts with our business and interests are most likely to arise from involvement in activities related to:

•	allocation of management time and services between us and the other entities,

•	the timing and terms of the investment in or sale of an asset,

•	development of our properties by affiliates,

•	investments with affiliates of our Advisor,

•	compensation to our Advisor, and

•	our relationship with our Property Manager.

If we do not successfully implement our business strategy, we may be unable to generate cash needed to continue to make distributions to our stockholders and to maintain or increase the value of our assets.

There is no separate counsel for us and our affiliates, which could result in conflicts of interest.

Morrison & Foerster LLP acts as legal counsel to us and also represents our Advisor and some of its affiliates. There is a possibility in the future that the interests of the various parties may become adverse and, under the Code of Professional Responsibility of the legal profession, Morrison & Foerster LLP may be precluded from representing any one or all such parties. If any situation arises in which our interests appear to be in conflict with those of our Advisor or its affiliates, additional counsel may be retained by one or more of the parties to assure that their interests are adequately protected. Moreover, should a conflict of interest not be readily apparent, Morrison & Foerster LLP may inadvertently act in derogation of the interest of the parties, which could affect our ability to meet our investment objectives.

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

The limit on the number of shares a person may own may discourage a takeover that could otherwise result in a premium price to our stockholders and may hinder a stockholder's ability to dispose of his or her shares.

Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. In this respect, among other things, unless exempted (prospectively or retroactively) by our board of directors, no person may own more than 9.8% in value of the aggregate of our outstanding shares of stock or more than 9.8% (in value or number, whichever is more restrictive) of the aggregate of the outstanding shares of our common stock. This restriction may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock, and may make it more difficult for a stockholder to sell or dispose of his or her shares.

Our charter permits our board of directors to issue stock with terms that may subordinate the rights of common stockholders or discourage a third party from acquiring us in a manner that might result in a premium price to our stockholders.

Our charter permits our board of directors to issue up to 510,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 185,000,000 are designated as Class A shares, 75,000,000 are designated as Class I shares, 175,000,000 are designated as Class T shares, and 75,000,000 are designated as Class T2 shares, and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock. In addition, our board of directors, without any action by our stockholders, may amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares or the number of shares of any class or series of stock that we have authority to issue. Our board of directors may classify or reclassify any unissued common stock or preferred stock into other classes or series of stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms and conditions of repurchase of any such stock. Thus, if also approved by a majority of our independent directors not otherwise interested in the transaction, who will have access, at our expense, to our legal counsel or independent legal counsel, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of additional preferred stock with terms and

14

---

Table of Contents

conditions that could have a priority as to distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation over the rights of the holders of our common stock. Preferred stock could also have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock.

Although we are not currently afforded the full protection of the Maryland General Corporation Law relating to deterring or defending hostile takeovers, our board of directors could opt into these provisions of Maryland law in the future, which may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and may prevent stockholders from receiving a premium price for their stock in connection with a business combination.

Under Maryland law, “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and certain interested stockholders or affiliates of interested stockholders are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. Also under Maryland law, control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares owned by the acquirer, an officer of the corporation or an employee of the corporation who is also a director of the corporation are excluded from the vote on whether to accord voting rights to the control shares. Should our board of directors opt into these provisions of Maryland law, it may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer. Similarly, Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the Maryland General Corporation Law could provide similar anti-takeover protection.

Our stockholders’ investment return may be reduced if we were to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). If we lose our exemption from registration under the 1940 Act, we would not be able to continue its business unless and until we register under the 1940 Act.

We do not intend to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act. As of December 31, 2019, we owned 152 properties, and investments in real estate will represent the substantial majority of our total asset mix, which would not subject us to the 1940 Act. In order to maintain an exemption from regulation under the 1940 Act, we must engage primarily in the business of buying real estate.

To maintain compliance with our 1940 Act exemption, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we may be required to acquire additional income- or loss-generating assets that we might not otherwise acquire or forego opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we would otherwise want to acquire. If we are required to register as an investment company but fail to do so, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business, and criminal and civil actions could be brought against us. In addition, our contracts would be unenforceable unless a court required enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.

If our stockholders do not agree with the decisions of our board of directors, our stockholders will only have limited control over changes in our policies and operations and may not be able to change such policies and operations.

Our board of directors determines our major policies, including our policies regarding investments, financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our board of directors may amend or revise these and other policies without a vote of the stockholders except to the extent that such policies are set forth in our charter. Under the Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter, our stockholders have a right to vote only on the following:

•	the election or removal of directors;

•

the amendment of our charter (including a change in our investment objectives), except that our board of directors may amend our charter without stockholder approval to (a) increase or decrease the aggregate number of our shares or the number of shares of any class or series that we have the authority to issue, (b) effect certain reverse stock splits, and (c) change our name or the name or other designation or the par value of any class or series of our stock and the aggregate par value of our stock;

•	our liquidation or dissolution; and

•	certain mergers, reorganizations of our company (including statutory share exchanges), consolidations or sales or other dispositions of all or substantially all our assets, as provided in our charter and under Maryland law.

All other matters are subject to the discretion of our board of directors.

Our board of directors may change our investment policies without stockholder approval, which could alter the nature of our stockholders' investments.

Our charter requires that our independent directors review our investment policies at least annually to determine that the policies we are following are in the best interest of the stockholders. These policies may change over time. The methods of

15

---

Table of Contents

implementing our investment objectives and strategies also may vary, as new real estate development trends emerge and new investment techniques are developed. Except to the extent that policies and investment limitations are included in our charter, our investment policies, the methods for their implementation, and our other objectives, policies and procedures may be altered by our board of directors without the approval of our stockholders. As a result, the nature of our stockholders' investment could change without their consent.

Because of our holding company structure, we depend on our operating subsidiary and its subsidiaries for cash flow and we will be structurally subordinated in right of payment to the obligations of such operating subsidiary and its subsidiaries.

We are a holding company with no business operations of our own. Our only significant asset is and will be the general partnership interests of our Operating Partnership. We intend to conduct substantially all of our business operations through our Operating Partnership. Accordingly, our only source of cash to pay our obligations will be distributions from our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries of their net earnings and cash flows. We cannot give assurance that our Operating Partnership or its subsidiaries will be able to, or be permitted to, make distributions to us that will enable us to make distributions to our stockholders from cash flows from operations. Each of our Operating Partnership’s subsidiaries will be a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, legal and contractual restrictions may limit our ability to obtain cash from such entities. In addition, because we are a holding company, stockholders’ claims as stockholders will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities and obligations of our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. Therefore, in the event of our bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization, our assets and those of our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries will be able to satisfy our stockholders’ claims as stockholders only after all of our and our Operating Partnership’s and its subsidiaries’ liabilities and obligations have been paid in full.

Our stockholders’ interest in us will be diluted if we issue additional shares.

Existing stockholders do not have preemptive rights to any shares issued by us in the future. Our charter authorizes 610,000,000 shares of stock, of which 510,000,000 shares are classified as common stock and 100,000,000 are classified as preferred stock. Of the 510,000,000 shares of common stock, 185,000,000 shares are designated as Class A shares, 75,000,000 shares are designated as Class I shares, 175,000,000 shares are designated as Class T shares and 75,000,000 shares are designated as Class T2 shares. Subject to any limitations set forth under Maryland law, our board of directors may increase the number of authorized shares of stock, increase or decrease the number of shares of any class or series of stock designated, or reclassify any unissued shares without the necessity of obtaining stockholder approval. All such shares may be issued in the discretion of our board of directors. Therefore, existing stockholders would experience dilution of their equity investment in us if we (i) sell additional shares in the future, including those issued pursuant to our DRIP Offering, (2) sell securities that are convertible into shares of our common stock, (3) issue shares of our common stock in a private offering of securities to institutional investors, (4) issue restricted shares of our common stock to our independent directors, (5) issue shares of our common stock in a merger or to sellers of properties acquired by us in connection with an exchange of limited partnership interests of our Operating Partnership. Because the limited partnership interests of our Operating Partnership may, in the discretion of our board of directors, be exchanged for shares of our common stock, any merger, exchange or conversion between our Operating Partnership and another entity ultimately could result in the issuance of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, thereby diluting the percentage ownership interest of other stockholders. Because of these and other reasons, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution in their percentage ownership of our shares.

If we internalize our management functions, the percentage of our outstanding common stock owned by our stockholders could be reduced, and we could incur other significant costs associated with being self-administered.

In the future, our board of directors may consider internalizing the functions performed for us by our Advisor. The method by which we could internalize these functions could take many forms, including without limitation, acquiring our Advisor. There is no assurance that internalizing our management functions would be beneficial to us and our stockholders. Any internalization transaction could result in significant payments to the owners of our Advisor, including in the form of our stock, which could reduce the percentage ownership of our then existing stockholders and concentrate ownership in the owner of our Advisor. Additionally, we may not realize the perceived benefits, we may not be able to properly integrate a new staff of managers and employees or we may not be able to effectively replicate the services provided previously by our Advisor, Property Manager or their affiliates. Internalization transactions involving the acquisition of advisors or property managers affiliated with entity sponsors have also, in some cases, been the subject of litigation. Even if these claims are without merit, we could be forced to spend significant amounts of money defending claims, which would reduce the amount of funds available for us to invest in properties or other investments and to pay distributions. All of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

Payment of fees and expenses to our Advisor and our Property Manager will reduce the cash available for distribution and will increase the risk that our stockholders will not be able to recover the amount of their investment in our shares.

Our Advisor and our Property Manager perform services for us, including, among other things, the selection and acquisition of our investments, the management of our assets, dispositions of assets, financing of our assets and certain

16

---

Table of Contents

administrative services. We pay our Advisor and our Property Manager fees and expense reimbursements for these services, which will reduce the amount of cash available for further investments or distribution to our stockholders.

We may be unable to maintain cash distributions or increase distributions over time.

There are many factors that can affect the availability and timing of cash distributions to stockholders. The amount of cash available for distributions is affected by many factors, such as our ability to buy properties, rental income from such properties and our operating expense levels, as well as many other variables. Actual cash available for distributions may vary substantially from estimates. We cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to maintain our current level of distributions or that distributions will increase over time. We also cannot give any assurance that rents from our properties will increase, that the securities we buy will increase in value or provide constant or increased distributions over time, or that future acquisitions of real properties or any investments in securities will increase our cash available for distributions to stockholders. Our actual results may differ significantly from the assumptions used by our board of directors in establishing the distribution rate to stockholders. We may not have sufficient cash from operations to make a distribution required to maintain our REIT status. We may make distributions from the proceeds of our Offerings or from borrowings in anticipation of future cash flow. Any such distributions will constitute a return of capital and may reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in properties and negatively impact the value of our stockholders’ investment.

General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate

Our operating results will be affected by economic and regulatory changes that have an adverse impact on the real estate market in general, which may prevent us from being profitable or from realizing growth in the value of our real estate properties.

Our operating results are subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate, including:

•	changes in general economic or local conditions;

•	changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing properties in an area;

•	changes in interest rates and availability of permanent mortgage funds that may render the sale of a property difficult or unattractive;

•	changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning laws; and

•	periods of high interest rates and tight money supply.

These and other reasons may prevent us from being profitable or from realizing growth or maintaining the value of our real estate properties.

If a tenant declares bankruptcy, we may be unable to collect balances due under relevant leases, which would reduce our cash flow from operations and the amount available for distributions to our stockholders.

Any of our tenants, or any guarantor of a tenant’s lease obligations, could be subject to a bankruptcy proceeding pursuant to Title 11 of the bankruptcy laws of the United States. Such a bankruptcy filing would bar all efforts by us to collect pre-bankruptcy debts from these entities or their properties, unless we receive an enabling order from the bankruptcy court. Post-bankruptcy debts would be paid currently. If a lease is assumed, all pre-bankruptcy balances owing under it must be paid in full. If a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would have a general unsecured claim for damages. If a lease is rejected, it is unlikely we would receive any payments from the tenant because our claim is capped at the rent reserved under the lease, without acceleration, for the greater of one year or 15% of the remaining term of the lease, but not greater than three years, plus rent already due but unpaid. This claim could be paid only if funds were available, and then only in the same percentage as that realized on other unsecured claims.

A tenant or lease guarantor bankruptcy could delay efforts to collect past due balances under the relevant leases, and could ultimately preclude full collection of these sums. Such an event could cause a decrease or cessation of rental payments that would mean a reduction in our cash flow and the amount available for distributions to our stockholders. In the event of a bankruptcy, we cannot give assurance that the tenant or its trustee will assume our lease. If a given lease, or guaranty of a lease, is not assumed, our cash flow and the amounts available for distributions to our stockholders may be adversely affected.

Our investments in properties where the underlying tenant has a below investment grade credit rating, as determined by major credit rating agencies, or unrated tenants, may have a greater risk of default and therefore may have an adverse impact on our returns on that asset and our operating results.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, approximately 14.5% of our total rental revenue was derived from tenants that had an investment grade credit rating from a major ratings agency, 24.0% of our total rental revenue was derived from tenants that were rated but did not have an investment grade credit rating from a major ratings agency and 61.5% of our total rental

17

---

Table of Contents

revenue was derived from tenants that were not rated. Approximately 18.8% of our total rental revenue was derived from non-rated tenants that were affiliates of companies having an investment grade credit rating. Our investments with tenants that do not have an investment grade credit rating from a major ratings agency or were not rated and are not affiliated with companies having an investment grade credit rating may have a greater risk of default and bankruptcy than investments in properties leased exclusively to investment grade tenants. When we invest in properties where the tenant does not have a publicly available credit rating, we use certain credit assessment tools as well as rely on our own estimates of the tenant’s credit rating which include but are not limited to reviewing the tenant’s financial information (i.e., financial ratios, net worth, revenue, cash flows, leverage and liquidity) and monitoring local market conditions. If our lender or a credit rating agency disagrees with our ratings estimates, or our ratings estimates are otherwise inaccurate, we may not be able to obtain our desired level of leverage or our financing costs may exceed those that we projected. This outcome could have an adverse impact on our returns on that asset and hence our operating results.

If a sale-leaseback transaction is re-characterized in a tenant’s bankruptcy proceeding, our financial condition could be adversely affected.

We have entered and may continue to enter into sale-leaseback transactions, whereby we would purchase a property and then lease the same property back to the person from whom we purchased it. In the event of the bankruptcy of a tenant, a transaction structured as a sale-leaseback may be re-characterized as either a financing or a joint venture, either of which outcome could adversely affect our business. If the sale-leaseback were re-characterized as a financing, we might not be considered the owner of the property, and as a result would have the status of a creditor in relation to the tenant. In that event, we would no longer have the right to sell or encumber our ownership interest in the property. Instead, we would have a claim against the tenant for the amounts owed under the lease, with the claim arguably secured by the property. The tenant/debtor might have the ability to propose a plan restructuring the term, interest rate and amortization schedule of its outstanding balance. If confirmed by the bankruptcy court, we could be bound by the new terms, and prevented from foreclosing our lien on the property. If the sale-leaseback were re-characterized as a joint venture, our lessee and we could be treated as co-venturers with regard to the property. As a result, we could be held liable, under some circumstances, for debts incurred by the lessee relating to the property. Either of these outcomes could adversely affect our cash flow and the amount available for distributions to our stockholders.

Properties that have vacancies for a significant period of time could be difficult to sell, which could diminish the return on our stockholders’ investment.

A property may incur vacancies either by the continued default of tenants under their leases or the expiration of tenant leases. If vacancies continue for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues, resulting in less cash to be distributed to stockholders. In addition, because properties’ market values depend principally upon the value of the properties’ leases, the resale value of properties with prolonged vacancies could suffer, which could further reduce our stockholders’ return.

We may obtain only limited warranties when we purchase a property and would have only limited recourse if our due diligence did not identify any issues that lower the value of our property.

The seller of a property often sells such property in its “as is” condition on a “where is” basis and “with all faults,” without any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular use or purpose. In addition, purchase agreements may contain only limited warranties, representations and indemnifications that will only survive for a limited period after the closing. The purchase of properties with limited warranties increases the risk that we may lose some or all of our invested capital in the property as well as the loss of rental income from that property.

We may be unable to secure funds for future tenant improvements or capital needs, which could adversely impact our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders.

When tenants do not renew their leases or otherwise vacate their space, it is usual that, in order to attract replacement tenants, we will be required to expend substantial funds for tenant improvements and tenant refurbishments to the vacated space. In addition, although we expect that our leases with tenants will require tenants to pay routine property maintenance costs, we will likely be responsible for any major structural repairs, such as repairs to the foundation, exterior walls and rooftops. We will use substantially all of our gross offering proceeds to buy real estate and pay various fees and expenses. Accordingly, if we need additional capital in the future to improve or maintain our properties or for any other reason, we will have to obtain financing from other sources, such as cash flow from operations, borrowings, property sales or future equity offerings. These sources of funding may not be available on attractive terms or at all. If we cannot procure additional funding for capital improvements, our investments may generate lower cash flows or decline in value, or both.

Our inability to sell a property when we desire to do so could adversely impact our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders.

The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand, that are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to

18

---

Table of Contents

sell any property for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property.

We may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We cannot give assurance that we will have funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements. Moreover, in acquiring a property, we may agree to restrictions that prohibit the sale of that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that property. These provisions would restrict our ability to sell a property.

We may not be able to sell a property at a price equal to, or greater than, the price for which we purchased such property, which may lead to a decrease in the value of our assets and a reduction in the value of shares held by our stockholders.

Some of our leases will not contain rental increases over time, or the rental increases may be less than the fair market rate at a future point in time. Therefore, the value of the property to a potential purchaser may not increase over time, which may restrict our ability to sell a property, or if we are able to sell such property, may lead to a sale price less than the price that we paid to purchase the property.

We may acquire or finance properties with lock-out provisions, which may prohibit us from selling a property, or may require us to maintain specified debt levels for a period of years on some properties.

A lock-out provision is a provision that prohibits the prepayment of a loan during a specified period of time. Lock-out provisions could materially restrict us from selling or otherwise disposing of or refinancing properties. These provisions would affect our ability to turn our investments into cash and thus affect cash available for distributions to our stockholders. Lock-out provisions may prohibit us from reducing the outstanding indebtedness with respect to any properties, refinancing such indebtedness on a non-recourse basis at maturity, or increasing the amount of indebtedness with respect to such properties. Lock-out provisions could impair our ability to take other actions during the lock-out period that could be in the best interests of our stockholders and, therefore, may have an adverse impact on the value of the shares, relative to the value that would result if the lock-out provisions did not exist. In particular, lock-out provisions could preclude us from participating in major transactions that could result in a disposition of our assets or a change in control even though that disposition or change in control might be in the best interests of our stockholders.

Rising expenses could reduce cash flow and funds available for future acquisitions or distributions to our stockholders.

Our properties and any other properties that we buy in the future will be subject to operating risks common to real estate in general, any or all of which may negatively affect us. If any property is not fully occupied or if rents are being paid in an amount that is insufficient to cover operating expenses, we could be required to expend funds with respect to that property for operating expenses. The properties will be subject to increases in tax rates, utility costs, operating expenses, insurance costs, repairs and maintenance and administrative expenses. While we expect that many of our properties will continue to be leased on a net lease basis or require the tenants to pay all or a portion of such expenses, renewals of leases or future leases may not be negotiated on that basis, in which event we may have to pay those costs. If we are unable to lease properties on a net lease basis or on a basis requiring the tenants to pay all or some of such expenses, or if tenants fail to pay required tax, utility and other impositions, we could be required to pay those costs, which could adversely affect funds available for future acquisitions or cash available for distributions.

The outbreak of widespread contagious disease, such as the Coronavirus, could adversely impact the value of our investments, the ability to meet our capital and operating needs or make cash distributions to our stockholders.

The widespread outbreak of infectious or contagious disease, such as H1N1 influenza (swine flu), avian bird flu, SARS, the Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Zika virus, could adversely impact our ability to generate income sufficient to meet operating expenses or generate income and capital appreciation, if any, at rates lower than those anticipated or available through investments in comparable real estate or other investments.

We also may depend on access to third-party sources to continue our investing activities and pay distributions to our stockholders. Our access to third-party sources depends on, in part, general market conditions, including conditions that are out of our control, such as the impact of health and safety concerns like the COVID-19 outbreak.

As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, COVID-19 has affected more than 100 countries and has significantly disrupted the day-to-day activities of individuals and businesses.

Further, as it relates to our healthcare properties, such a crisis could diminish the public trust in healthcare facilities, especially hospitals or facilities that fail to accurately or timely diagnose, or other facilities such as medical office buildings that are treating (or have treated) patients affected by contagious diseases. If any of our facilities were involved in treating patients for such a contagious disease, other patients might cancel elective procedures or fail to seek needed care from our tenants’ facilities. In addition, a flu pandemic or other widespread illness such as coronavirus could significantly increase the cost

19

---

Table of Contents

burdens faced by our tenants, including if they are required to increase staffing and/or implement quarantines. Further, a pandemic might adversely impact our tenants’ businesses by causing a temporary shutdown or diversion of patients, by disrupting or delaying production and delivery of materials and products in the supply chain or by causing staffing shortages in those facilities, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to pay distributions.

The extent to which our business may be affected by COVID-19 will largely depend on future developments with respect to the continued spread and treatment of the virus, which we cannot accurately predict. New information and developments may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact. Our business and financial results could be materially and adversely impacted.

Terrorist attacks, acts of violence or war or public health crises may affect the markets in which we operate and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

Terrorist attacks, acts of war and public health crises (including the recent COVID-19 outbreak) may negatively affect our operations and our stockholders’ investments. We may acquire real estate assets located in areas that are susceptible to terrorist attacks, acts of war, or public health crises. These events may directly impact the value of our assets through damage, destruction, loss or increased security costs. Although we may obtain terrorism insurance, we may not be able to obtain sufficient coverage to fund any losses we may incur. Risks associated with potential acts of terrorism could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Further, certain losses resulting from these types of events are uninsurable or not insurable at reasonable costs.

More generally, any terrorist attack, other act of violence or war, or public health crisis (such as the COVID-19 outbreak) could result in increased volatility in, or damage to, the U.S. and worldwide financial markets and economy, all of which could adversely affect our tenants’ ability to pay rent on their leases or our ability to borrow money at acceptable prices, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

Real estate-related taxes may increase and if these increases are not passed on to tenants, our income will be reduced.

Some local real property tax assessors may seek to reassess some of our properties as a result of our acquisition of such properties. From time to time our property taxes may increase as property values or assessment rates change or for other reasons deemed relevant by the assessors. An increase in the assessed valuation of a property for real estate tax purposes will result in an increase in the related real estate taxes on that property. Although some tenant leases may permit us to pass through such tax increases to the tenants for payment, there is no assurance that renewal leases or future leases will be negotiated on the same basis. Increases not passed through to tenants will adversely affect our income, cash available for distributions, and the amount of distributions to our stockholders.

Covenants, conditions and restrictions may restrict our ability to operate our properties.

Some of our properties may be contiguous to other parcels of real property, comprising part of the same commercial center. In connection with such properties, there are significant covenants, conditions and restrictions, or "CC&Rs," restricting the operation of such properties and any improvements on such properties, and related to granting easements on such properties. Moreover, the operation and management of the contiguous properties may impact such properties. Compliance with CC&Rs may adversely affect our operating costs and reduce the amount of funds that we have available to pay distributions.

Our operating results may be negatively affected by potential development and construction delays and result in increased costs and risks.

We may use proceeds from our Offerings to acquire and develop properties upon which we will construct improvements. We will be subject to uncertainties associated with re-zoning for development, environmental concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups, and our builder’s ability to build in conformity with plans, specifications, budgeted costs, and timetables. A builder’s performance also may be affected or delayed by conditions beyond the builder’s control. Delays in completion of construction could also give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases. We may incur additional risks when we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders before they complete construction. These and other such factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we will be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. We also must rely on rental income and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a price at the time we acquire the property. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property, and our return on our investment could suffer.

We may invest in unimproved real property, subject to the limitations on investments in unimproved real property contained in our charter, which complies with the NASAA REIT Guidelines limitation restricting us from investing more than 10% of our total assets in unimproved real property. For purposes of this paragraph, "unimproved real property" is real property

20

---

Table of Contents

which has not been acquired for the purpose of producing rental or other operating income, has no development or construction in process and on which no construction or development is planned in good faith to commence within one year. Returns from development of unimproved properties are also subject to risks associated with re-zoning the land for development and environmental concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups. Although we intend to limit any investment in unimproved property to property we intend to develop, our stockholders’ investment nevertheless is subject to the risks associated with investments in unimproved real property.

Competition with third parties in acquiring properties and other investments may impede our ability to make future acquisitions or may increase the cost of these acquisitions and reduce our profitability and the return on our stockholders’ investment.

We compete with many other entities engaged in real estate investment activities, including individuals, corporations, bank and insurance company investment accounts, other REITs, real estate limited partnerships, other entities engaged in real estate investment activities and private equity firms, many of which have greater resources than we do. Competition for properties may significantly increase the price we must pay for properties or other assets we seek to acquire and our competitors may succeed in acquiring those properties or assets themselves. In addition, our potential acquisition targets may find our competitors to be more attractive because they may have greater resources, may be willing to pay more for the properties or may have a more compatible operating philosophy. Larger entities may enjoy significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies. Further, the number of entities and the amount of funds competing for suitable investments may increase. This competition will result in increased demand for these assets and therefore increased prices paid for them. Because of an increased interest in single-property acquisitions among tax-motivated individual purchasers, we may pay higher prices if we purchase single properties in comparison with portfolio acquisitions. If we pay higher prices for properties and other investments, our profitability will be reduced and our stockholders may experience a lower return on their investment.

We will be subject to additional risks of our joint venture partner or partners when we enter into a joint venture, which could reduce the value of our investment.

We may enter into joint ventures with other real estate groups. The success of a particular joint venture may be limited if our joint venture partner becomes bankrupt or otherwise is unable to perform its obligations in accordance with the terms of the particular joint venture arrangement. The joint venture partner may have economic or business interests or goals that are or may become inconsistent with our business interests or goals. In addition, a dispute with our joint venture partners may result in litigation, which may cause us to incur additional expenses, require additional time and resources from our Advisor and result in liability, each of which could adversely affect our operating results and the value of our stockholders’ investment. In addition, we may assume liabilities related to the joint venture that exceed the percentage of our investment in the joint venture.

Our properties face competition that may affect tenants’ willingness to pay the amount of rent requested by us and the amount of rent paid to us may affect the cash available for distributions and the amount of distributions.

There will be numerous other properties within the market area of each of our properties that will compete with us for tenants. The number of competitive properties could have a material effect on our ability to rent space at our properties and the amount of rents charged. We could be adversely affected if additional properties are built in locations competitive with our properties, causing increased competition for customer traffic and creditworthy tenants. This could result in decreased cash flow from tenants and may require us to make capital improvements to properties that we would not have otherwise made, thus affecting cash available for distributions and the amount available for distributions to our stockholders.

Delays in acquisitions of properties may have an adverse effect on the value of our stockholders’ investment.

There may be a substantial period of time before all of the proceeds of our Offering are invested. Delays we encounter in the selection, acquisition and/or development of properties could adversely affect our stockholders’ returns. When properties are acquired prior to the start of construction or during the early stages of construction, it will typically take several months to complete construction and rent available space. Therefore, our stockholders could suffer delays in the payment of cash distributions attributable to those particular properties.

Costs of complying with governmental laws and regulations, including those relating to environmental protection and human health and safety, may adversely affect our income and the cash available for any distributions.

All real property investments and the operations conducted in connection with such investments are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on customers, owners or operators for the costs to investigate or remediate contaminated properties, regardless of fault or whether the acts causing the contamination were legal.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances on such real property. Such laws often impose

21

---

Table of Contents

liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell, rent or pledge such real property as collateral for future borrowings. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which real property may be used or businesses may be operated. Some of these laws and regulations have been amended so as to require compliance with new or more stringent standards as of future dates. Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require us to incur material expenditures. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material environmental liability. Additionally, our tenants’ operations, the existing condition of land when we buy it, operations in the vicinity of our real properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties may affect our real properties. There are also various local, state and federal fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations with which we may be required to comply and which may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance. In connection with the acquisition and ownership of our real properties, we may be exposed to such costs in connection with such regulations. The cost of defending against environmental claims, of any damages or fines we must pay, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements or of remediating any contaminated real property could materially and adversely affect our business, lower the value of our assets or results of operations and, consequently, lower the amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.

If we sell properties by providing financing to purchasers, defaults by the purchasers would adversely affect our cash flows.

In some instances we may sell our properties by providing financing to purchasers. When we provide financing to purchasers, we will bear the risk that the purchaser may default, which could negatively impact our cash distributions to stockholders. Even in the absence of a purchaser default, the distribution of the proceeds of sales to our stockholders, or their reinvestment in other assets, will be delayed until the promissory notes or other property we may accept upon the sale are actually paid, sold, refinanced or otherwise disposed of. In some cases, we may receive initial down payments in cash and other property in the year of sale in an amount less than the selling price, and subsequent payments will be spread over a number of years. If any purchaser defaults under a financing arrangement with us, it could negatively impact our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders.

Our recovery of an investment in a mortgage loan that has defaulted may be limited.

There is no guarantee that the mortgage, loan or deed of trust securing an investment will, following a default, permit us to recover the original investment and interest that would have been received absent a default. The security provided by a mortgage, deed of trust or loan is directly related to the difference between the amount owed and the appraised market value of the property. Although we intend to rely on a current real estate appraisal when we make the investment, the value of the property is affected by factors outside our control, including general fluctuations in the real estate market, rezoning, neighborhood changes, highway relocations and failure by the borrower to maintain the property. In addition, we may incur the costs of litigation in our efforts to enforce our rights under defaulted loans.

Our costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act may affect cash available for distributions.

Our properties are subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or the Disabilities Act. Under the Disabilities Act, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The Disabilities Act has separate compliance requirements for "public accommodations" and "commercial facilities" that generally require that buildings and services, including restaurants and retail stores, be made accessible and available to people with disabilities. The Disabilities Act’s requirements could require removal of access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties, or, in some cases, an award of damages. We will attempt to acquire properties that comply with the Disabilities Act or place the burden on the seller or other third party, such as a tenant, to ensure compliance with the Disabilities Act. However, we cannot give assurance that we will be able to acquire properties or allocate responsibilities in this manner. If we cannot, our funds used for Disabilities Act compliance may affect cash available for distributions and the amount of distributions to our stockholders.

Risks Associated with Investments in the Healthcare Property Sector

Our real estate investments may become concentrated in healthcare properties, making us more vulnerable economically than if our investments were diversified.

We are subject to risks inherent in concentrating investments in real estate. These risks resulting from a lack of diversification are even greater as a result of our business strategy to invest to a substantial degree in healthcare properties. A downturn in the commercial real estate industry generally could significantly adversely affect the value of our properties. A downturn in the healthcare industry could negatively affect our lessees’ ability to make lease payments to us and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. These adverse effects could be more pronounced than if we diversified our investments outside of real estate or if our portfolio does not include a concentration in healthcare properties. Our investments in healthcare properties accounted for 48.0% of our total rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019.

22

---

Table of Contents

Certain of our properties may not have efficient alternative uses, so the loss of a tenant may cause us to not be able to find a replacement or cause us to spend considerable capital to adapt the property to an alternative use.

Some of the properties we have acquired and seek to acquire are healthcare properties that may only be suitable for similar healthcare-related tenants. If we or our tenants terminate the leases for these properties or our tenants lose their regulatory authority to operate such properties, we may not be able to locate suitable replacement tenants to lease the properties for their specialized uses. Alternatively, we may be required to spend substantial amounts to adapt the properties to other uses. Any loss of revenues or additional capital expenditures required as a result may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Our healthcare properties and tenants may be unable to compete successfully, which could result in lower rent payments, reduce our cash flows from operations and amount available for distributions to our stockholders.

The healthcare properties we have acquired or seek to acquire in the future may face competition from nearby hospitals and other healthcare properties that provide comparable services. Some of those competing facilities are owned by governmental agencies and therefore are supported by tax revenues, and others are owned by non-profit corporations and therefore are supported to a large extent by endowments and charitable contributions. Not all of our properties will be affiliated with non-profit corporations and receive such support. Similarly, our tenants will face competition from other healthcare practices in nearby hospitals and other healthcare properties. Our tenants’ failure to compete successfully with these other practices could adversely affect their ability to make rental payments, which could adversely affect our rental revenues. Further, from time to time and for reasons beyond our control, referral sources, including physicians and managed care organizations, may change their lists of hospitals or physicians that are permitted to participate in the payer program. This could adversely affect our tenants’ ability to make rental payments, which could adversely affect our rental revenues. Any reduction in rental revenues resulting from the inability of our healthcare properties and our tenants to compete successfully may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Reductions in reimbursement from third party payors, including Medicare and Medicaid, could adversely affect the profitability of our tenants and hinder their ability to make rental payments to us.

Sources of revenue for our tenants may include the federal Medicare program, state Medicaid programs, private insurance carriers and health maintenance organizations, among others. Healthcare providers continue to face increased government and private payor pressure to control or reduce healthcare costs and significant reductions in healthcare reimbursement, including reduced reimbursements and changes to payment methodologies under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 ("Affordable Care Act"). In some cases, private insurers rely upon all or portions of the Medicare payment systems to determine payment rates that may result in decreased reimbursement from private insurers.

A slowdown in the United States economy could negatively affect state budgets, thereby putting pressure on states to decrease spending on state programs including Medicaid. Potential reductions to Medicaid program spending in response to state budgetary pressures could negatively impact the ability of our tenants to successfully operate their businesses.

Efforts by payors to reduce healthcare costs will likely continue which may result in reductions or slower growth in reimbursement for certain services provided by some of our tenants. A reduction in reimbursements to our tenants from third party payors for any reason could adversely affect our tenants’ ability to make rent payments to us which may have a material adverse effect on our businesses, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

The healthcare industry is heavily regulated, and new laws or regulations, changes to existing laws or regulations, loss of licensure or failure to obtain licensure could result in the inability of our tenants to make rent payments to us.

The healthcare industry is heavily regulated by U.S. federal, state and local governmental authorities. Our tenants generally are subject to laws and regulations covering, among other things, licensure, certification for participation in government programs, billing for services, privacy and security of health information, and relationships with physicians and other referral sources. In addition, new laws and regulations, changes in existing laws and regulations or changes in the interpretation of such laws or regulations could negatively affect our financial condition and the financial condition of our tenants. These changes, in some cases, could apply retroactively. The enactment, timing, or effect of legislative or regulatory changes cannot be predicted.

The Affordable Care Act is changing how healthcare services are covered, delivered, and reimbursed through expanded coverage of uninsured individuals and reduced Medicare program spending. In addition, it reforms certain aspects of health insurance, expands existing efforts to tie Medicare and Medicaid payments to performance and quality, and contains provisions intended to strengthen fraud and abuse enforcement. The complexities and ramifications of the Affordable Care Act are significant and are being implemented in a phased approach which began in 2010.

23

---

Table of Contents

It is possible that Congress will continue to consider other legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act or repeal and replace some or all elements of the Affordable Care Act.

We cannot predict how the Affordable Care Act might be amended or modified, either through the legislative or judicial process, and how any such modification might impact our tenants’ operations or the net effect of this law on us. If the operations, cash flows, or financial condition of our operators and tenants are materially adversely impacted by any repeal or modification of the law, our revenue and operations may be materially adversely affected as well.

Recent changes to healthcare laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of our tenants and, consequently, their ability to meet obligations to us.

Statutory and regulatory policy changes and decisions may impact one or more specific providers that lease space in any of our properties. In addition, many states also regulate the establishment and construction of healthcare facilities and services, and the expansion of existing healthcare facilities and services through certificate of need, or CON, laws, which may include regulation of certain types of beds, medical equipment, and capital expenditures. Under such laws, the applicable state regulatory body must determine a need exists for a project before the project can be undertaken. If any of our tenants seeks to undertake a CON-regulated project, but are not authorized by the applicable regulatory body to proceed with the project, these tenants could be prevented from operating in their intended manner and could be materially adversely affected.

The application of lower reimbursement rates to our tenants or failure to qualify for existing rates under certain exceptions, the failure to comply with these laws and regulations, or the failure to secure CON approval to undertake a desired project could adversely affect our tenants’ ability to make rent payments to us which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Tenants of our healthcare properties are subject to anti-fraud and abuse laws, the violation of which by a tenant may jeopardize the tenant’s ability to make rent payments to us.

There are various federal and state laws prohibiting fraudulent and abusive business practices by healthcare providers who participate in, receive payments from, or are in a position to make referrals in connection with government-sponsored healthcare programs, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Our lease arrangements with certain tenants may also be subject to these fraud and abuse laws.

Violations of these laws may result in criminal and/or civil penalties that range from punitive sanctions, damage assessments, penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments, and/or exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Imposition of any of these penalties upon one of our tenants or strategic partners could jeopardize that tenant’s ability to operate or to make rent payments or affect the level of occupancy in our healthcare properties, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Adverse trends in healthcare provider operations may negatively affect our lease revenues and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

The healthcare industry is currently experiencing, among other things:

•	changes in the demand for and methods of delivering healthcare services;

•	changes in third party reimbursement methods and policies;

•	consolidation and pressure to integrate within the healthcare industry through acquisitions, joint ventures and managed service organizations; and

•	increased scrutiny of billing, referral, and other practices by U.S. federal and state authorities.

These factors may adversely affect the economic performance of some or all of our tenants and, in turn, our lease revenues and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Tenants of our healthcare properties may be subject to significant legal actions that could subject them to increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which may affect their ability to pay their rent payments to us.

As is typical in the healthcare industry, certain types of tenants of our healthcare properties may often become subject to claims that their services have resulted in patient injury or other adverse effects. Many of these tenants may have experienced an increasing trend in the frequency and severity of professional liability and general liability insurance claims and litigation asserted against them. The insurance coverage maintained by these tenants may not cover all claims made against them nor continue to be available at a reasonable cost, if at all. In some states, insurance coverage for the risk of punitive damages arising from professional liability and general liability claims and/or litigation may not, in certain cases, be available to these tenants due to state law prohibitions or limitations of availability. As a result, these types of tenants of our healthcare properties

24

---

Table of Contents

operating in these states may be liable for punitive damage awards that are either not covered or are in excess of their insurance policy limits.

Further, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, commonly referred to as HIPAA, was established in 1996 to set national standards for the confidentiality, security, and transmission of personal health information (PHI). Healthcare providers are required, under HIPAA and its implementing regulations, to protect and keep confidential any PHI. HIPAA also sets limits and conditions on use and disclosure of PHI without patient authorization. The law gives patients specific rights to their health information, including rights to obtain a copy of or request corrections to their medical records. The physician or the medical practice can be liable if there are improper disclosures of PHI, including from employee mishandling of PHI, medical records security breaches, lost or stolen electronic devices, hacking, social media breaches or failure to get patient authorizations. Violations could result in multi-million dollar penalties. Actual or potential violations of HIPAA could subject our tenants to government investigations, litigation or other enforcement actions which could adversely affect our tenants’ ability to pay rent and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

Risks Associated with Investments in the Data Center Property Sector

Our data center properties depend upon the technology industry and a reduction in the demand for technology-related real estate could adversely impact our ability to find or keep tenants for our data center properties, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

A portion of our portfolio of properties consists of data center properties. A decline in the technology industry or a decrease in the adoption of data center space for corporate enterprises could lead to a decrease in the demand for technology-related real estate, which may have a greater adverse effect on our business and financial condition than if we owned a portfolio with a more diversified tenant base. We are susceptible to adverse developments in the corporate and institutional data center and broader technology industries (such as business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocations of businesses, costs of complying with government regulations or increased regulation and other factors) and the technology-related real estate market (such as oversupply of or reduced demand for space). In addition, the rapid development of new technologies or the adoption of new industry standards could render many of our tenants’ current products and services obsolete or unmarketable and contribute to a downturn in their businesses, thereby increasing the likelihood that they default under their leases, become insolvent or file for bankruptcy. Our investments in data center properties accounted for 52.0% of our total rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Our data center properties may not be suitable for lease to certain data center, technology or office tenants without significant expenditures or renovations.

Because many of our data center properties will contain extensive tenant improvements installed at our tenants’ expense, they may be better suited for a specific corporate enterprise data center user or technology industry tenant and could require modification in order for us to re-lease vacant space to another corporate enterprise data center user or technology industry tenant. For the same reason, our properties also may not be suitable for lease to traditional office tenants without significant expenditures or renovations.

Our tenants may choose to develop new data centers or expand their existing data centers, which could result in the loss of one or more key tenants or reduce demand for our newly developed data centers.

Our larger tenants may choose to develop new data centers or expand any existing data centers of their own. In the event that any of our key tenants were to do so, it could result in a loss of business to us or put pressure on our pricing. If we lose a tenant, there is no guarantee that we would be able to replace that tenant at a competitive rate or at all.

Our data center infrastructure may become obsolete or less marketable and we may not be able to upgrade our power, cooling, security or connectivity systems cost-effectively or at all.

The markets for data centers, as well as the industries in which data center tenants operate, are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, frequent new service introductions, shifting distribution channels and changing tenant demands. The data center infrastructure in some of the data centers that we have acquired or may acquire in the future may become obsolete or less marketable due to demand for new processes and/or technologies, including, without limitation: (i) new processes to deliver power to, or eliminate heat from, computer systems; (ii) demand for additional redundancy capacity; or (iii) new technology that permits lower levels of critical load and heat removal than our data centers are currently designed to provide. In addition, the systems that connect our data centers to the Internet and other external networks may become outdated, including with respect to latency, reliability and diversity of connectivity. When tenants demand new processes or technologies, we may not be able to upgrade our data centers on a cost effective basis, or at all, due to, among other things, increased expenses to us that cannot be passed on to the tenant or insufficient revenue to fund the necessary capital expenditures. The obsolescence of the power and cooling systems in such data centers and/or our inability to

25

---

Table of Contents

upgrade our data centers, including associated connectivity, could have a material negative impact on our business. Furthermore, potential future regulations that apply to industries we serve may require users in those industries to seek specific requirements from their data centers that we are unable to provide. These may include physical security regulations applicable to the defense industry and government contractors and privacy and security requirements applicable to the financial services and health care industries. Such regulations could have a material adverse effect on us. If our competitors offer data center space that our existing or potential data center users perceive to be superior to ours based on numerous factors, including power, security considerations, location or network connectivity, or if they offer rental rates below our or current market rates, we may lose existing or potential tenants, incur costs to improve our properties or be forced to reduce our rental rates.

Risks Associated with Debt Financing and Investments

We have broad authority to incur debt, and high debt levels could hinder our ability to make distributions and could decrease the value of our stockholders’ investments.

Although, technically, our board of directors may approve unlimited levels of debt, our charter generally limits our ability to incur debt to no greater than 300% of our net assets before deducting depreciation, reserves for bad debts or other non-cash reserves (equivalent to approximately 75% leverage), unless any excess borrowing is approved by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to our stockholders in its next quarterly report, along with a justification for such excess borrowing. High debt levels would cause us to incur higher interest charges, would result in higher debt service payments, and could be accompanied by restrictive covenants. These factors could limit the amount of cash we have available to distribute and could result in a decline in the value of our stockholders’ investments.

We incur mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which may increase our business risks, and could hinder our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

We have placed, and intend to continue to place, permanent financing on our properties or obtain a credit facility or other similar financing arrangement in order to acquire properties. We may also decide to later further leverage our properties. We may incur mortgage debt and pledge all or some of our real properties as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire real properties. We may borrow if we need funds to pay a desired distribution rate to our stockholders. We may also borrow if we deem it necessary or advisable to assure that we qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. If there is a shortfall between the cash flow from our properties and the cash flow needed to service mortgage debt, then the amount available for distribution to our stockholders may be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In that case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, thus reducing the value of our stockholders’ investment. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but would not receive any cash proceeds. In such event, we may be unable to pay the amount of distributions required in order to maintain our REIT status. We may give full or partial guarantees to lenders of mortgage debt by the entities that own our properties. When we provide a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns one of our properties, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity. If any mortgages contain cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, a default on a single property could affect multiple properties. If any of our properties are foreclosed upon due to a default, our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected which could result in the loss of our REIT status and would result in a decrease in the value of our stockholders’ investment.

High interest rates may make it difficult for us to finance or refinance properties, which could reduce the number of properties we can acquire and the amount of cash distributions we can make.

If we place mortgage debt on properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance the properties when the loans come due, or of being unable to refinance at cost effective rates. If interest rates are higher when the properties are refinanced, we may not be able to finance the properties and our income could be reduced. If any of these events occur, our cash flow would be reduced. This, in turn, would reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders and may hinder our ability to raise more capital by issuing more stock or by borrowing more money.

Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to make distributions to stockholders at our current level.

When providing financing, a lender could impose restrictions on us that affect our distribution and operating policies, and our ability to incur additional debt. Loan documents we enter into may contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage the property, discontinue insurance coverage or replace our Advisor. These or other limitations may adversely affect our flexibility and limit our ability to make distributions to stockholders at our current level.

26

---

Table of Contents

Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect our ability to make distributions to stockholders at our current level.

With exposure to variable rate debt, increases in interest rates would increase our interest costs, which could reduce our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to stockholders at our current level. In addition, if we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments in properties at times that may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments.

The London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and certain other interest “benchmarks” may be subject to regulatory guidance and/or reform that could cause interest rates under our current or future debt agreements to perform differently than in the past or cause other unanticipated consequences. Additionally, LIBOR may cease to be published and could be replaced by alternative benchmarks, which could impact interest rates under our debt agreements.

The Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, has announced that it intends to stop encouraging or requiring banks to submit LIBOR rates after 2021. If LIBOR ceases to exist or if the methods of calculating LIBOR change from their current form, interest rates on our current or future debt obligations may be adversely affected.

Disruptions in the credit markets could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to stockholders at our current level.

In the past, domestic and international financial markets experienced significant disruptions which were brought about in large part by failures in the U.S. banking system. These disruptions severely impacted the availability of credit and contributed to rising costs associated with obtaining credit. If debt financing is not available on terms and conditions we find acceptable, we may not be able to obtain financing for investments. If these disruptions in the credit markets resurface, our ability to borrow monies to finance the purchase of, or other activities related to, real estate assets will be negatively impacted. If we are unable to borrow monies on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, we may be forced to use a greater proportion of our Offering proceeds to finance acquisitions, reduce the number of properties we can purchase, and/or dispose of some of our assets. These disruptions could also adversely affect the return on the properties we purchase. In addition, if we pay fees to lock in a favorable interest rate, falling interest rates or other factors could require us to forfeit these fees. All of these events would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to stockholders at our current level.

We may invest in collateralized mortgage-backed securities, which may increase our exposure to credit and interest rate risk.

We may invest in collateralized mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, which may increase our exposure to credit and interest rate risk. We have not adopted, and do not expect to adopt, any formal policies or procedures designed to manage risks associated with our investments in CMBS. In this context, credit risk is the risk that borrowers will default on the mortgages underlying the CMBS. We intend to manage this risk by investing in CMBS guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, such as the Government National Mortgage Association, or GNMA, or U.S. government sponsored enterprises, such as the Federal National Mortgage Association, or FNMA, or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or FHLMC. Interest rate risk occurs as prevailing market interest rates change relative to the current yield on the CMBS. For example, when interest rates fall, borrowers are more likely to prepay their existing mortgages to take advantage of the lower cost of financing. As prepayments occur, principal is returned to the holders of the CMBS sooner than expected, thereby lowering the effective yield on the investment. On the other hand, when interest rates rise, borrowers are more likely to maintain their existing mortgages. As a result, prepayments decrease, thereby extending the average maturity of the mortgages underlying the CMBS. We intend to manage interest rate risk by purchasing CMBS offered in tranches, or with sinking fund features, that are designed to match our investment objectives. If we are unable to manage these risks effectively, our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.

Any real estate debt security that we originate or purchase is subject to the risks of delinquency and foreclosure.

We may originate and purchase real estate debt securities, which are subject to risks of delinquency and foreclosure and risks of loss. Typically, we will not have recourse to the personal assets of our borrowers. The ability of a borrower to repay a real estate debt security secured by an income-producing property depends primarily upon the successful operation of the property, rather than upon the existence of independent income or assets of the borrower. If the net operating income of the property is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the real estate debt security may be impaired. We bear the risks of loss of principal to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the principal and accrued interest of the real estate debt security, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow from operations and limit amounts available for distribution to our stockholders. In the event of the bankruptcy of a real estate debt security borrower, the real estate debt security to that borrower will be deemed to be collateralized only to the extent of the value of the underlying collateral at the time of bankruptcy (as determined by the bankruptcy court), and the lien securing the real estate debt security will be subject to the avoidance powers of the bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession to the extent the lien is unenforceable under state law. Foreclosure of a real estate debt security can be an expensive and lengthy process that could have a substantial negative effect

27

---

Table of Contents

on our anticipated return on the foreclosed real estate debt security. We also may be forced to foreclose on certain properties, be unable to sell these properties and be forced to incur substantial expenses to improve operations at the property.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Risks

Failure to maintain our qualification as a REIT would adversely affect our operations and our ability to make distributions.

In order for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must satisfy certain requirements set forth in the Code and Treasury Regulations and various factual matters and circumstances that are not entirely within our control. We intend to structure our activities in a manner designed to satisfy all of these requirements. However, if certain of our operations were to be recharacterized by the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, such recharacterization could jeopardize our ability to satisfy all of the requirements for qualification as a REIT.

If we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT for any taxable year and we do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the taxable year in which we lost our REIT status. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer qualify for the dividends-paid deduction, and we would no longer be required to make distributions. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax. Our failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect the return of a stockholder's investment.

To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must meet annual distribution requirements, which may result in us distributing amounts that may otherwise be used for our operations and which could result in our forgoing otherwise attractive investment opportunities.

To maintain the favorable tax treatment afforded to REITs under the Code, we generally will be required each year to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income determined without regard to the dividends-paid deduction and excluding net capital gain. To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net capital gains or distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, as adjusted, we will have to pay tax on those amounts at regular ordinary and capital gains corporate tax rates. Furthermore, if we fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (a) 85% of our ordinary income for that year, (b) 95% of our capital gain net income for that year, and (c) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, we would have to pay a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of the required distribution over the sum of (a) the amounts that we actually distributed and (b) the amounts we retained and upon which we paid income tax at the corporate level. These requirements could cause us to distribute amounts that otherwise would be spent on investments in real estate assets, and it is possible that we might be required to borrow funds, possibly at unfavorable rates, or sell assets to fund these distributions. In addition, we could pay part of these required distributions in shares of our common stock, which would result in shareholders having tax liabilities from such distributions in excess of the cash they receive. The treatment of such taxable share distributions is not clear, and it is possible the taxable share distribution will not count towards our distribution requirement, in which case adverse consequences could apply. Although we intend to continue to make distributions sufficient to meet the annual distribution requirements and to avoid U.S. federal income and excise taxes, it is possible that we might not always be able to do so.

If the REIT Merger does not qualify as a tax-free reorganization, there may be adverse tax consequences. 

The REIT Merger is intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. The closing of the REIT Merger was conditioned on the receipt by each of REIT I and the Company of an opinion of its counsel to the effect that the REIT Merger will qualify as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. However, these legal opinions will not be binding on the IRS or on the courts. If, for any reason, the REIT Merger were to fail to qualify as a tax-free reorganization, then each former stockholder of REIT I (“Former REIT I stockholder”) generally would recognize gain or loss, as applicable, equal to the difference between (i) the merger consideration (i.e. the sum of the cash plus the fair market value of the shares of the Company’s Class A common stock) received by the Former REIT I stockholder in the REIT Merger; and (ii) the Former REIT I stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in its shares of REIT I common stock.

Our stockholders may have current tax liability on distributions they elect to reinvest in our common stock, and therefore our stockholders would need to use funds from another source to pay such tax liability.

If our stockholders participate in our distribution reinvestment plan, they will be deemed to have received, and for U.S. federal income tax purposes recognize taxable income in the amount reinvested in our shares, to the extent such amount does not exceed our earnings and profits. As a result, unless stockholders are tax-exempt entities, they may have to use funds from other sources to pay their tax liability on distributions reinvested in our shares.

28

---

Table of Contents

Certain of our business activities are potentially subject to the prohibited transaction tax, which could reduce the return on our stockholders’ investment.

Our ability to dispose of a property during the first few years following its acquisition may be restricted to a substantial extent as a result of our REIT status. Under applicable provisions of the Code regarding "prohibited transactions" by REITs, we would be subject to a 100% tax on any gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of any property (other than foreclosure property) that we own, directly or through any subsidiary entity, including our Operating Partnership, that is deemed to be inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of trade or business. Whether property is inventory or otherwise held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business depends on the particular facts and circumstances surrounding each property. Properties we own, directly or through any subsidiary entity, including our Operating Partnership, may, depending on how we conduct our operations, be treated as inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. Any such taxes we pay would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders. Our desire to avoid the prohibited transactions tax may cause us to forego disposition opportunities that would otherwise be advantageous if we were not a REIT.

In certain circumstances, we may be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes as a REIT, which would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Even if we maintain our qualification as a REIT, we may be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes. For example, we may be subject to the prohibited transactions tax and/or the excise tax for failing to make (or be deemed to have made) sufficient distributions, as described above. We also may decide to retain net capital gain we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability unless they file U.S. federal income tax returns and thereon seek a refund of such tax. We also may be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, either directly or indirectly through our Operating Partnership or other companies through which we indirectly own assets. Any taxes we pay would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

The use of taxable REIT subsidiaries, which may be required for REIT qualification purposes, would increase our overall tax liability and thereby reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Some of our assets may need to be owned by, or operations may need to be conducted through, one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. Any of our taxable REIT subsidiaries would be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax on its taxable income. The after-tax net income of our taxable REIT subsidiaries would be available for distribution to us. Further, we would incur a 100% excise tax on transactions with our taxable REIT subsidiaries that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis. For example, to the extent that the rent paid by one of our taxable REIT subsidiaries exceeds an arm’s-length rental amount, such amount would be potentially subject to a 100% excise tax. While we intend that all transactions between us and our taxable REIT subsidiaries would be conducted on an arm’s-length basis, and therefore, any amounts paid by our taxable REIT subsidiaries to us would not be subject to the excise tax, no assurance can be given that no excise tax would arise from such transactions.

Complying with REIT requirements may force us to forgo and/or liquidate otherwise attractive investment opportunities.

To qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of shares of our common stock. We may be required to forego otherwise attractive investments or make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

Complying with the REIT asset test requirements may force us to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified real estate assets, including certain mortgage loans and certain kinds of mortgage-related securities. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities, taxable REIT subsidiaries and qualified real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets can consist of the securities (other than government securities, taxable REIT subsidiaries, and qualified real estate assets) of any one issuer. No more than 20% of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries, and no more than 25% of the value of our assets may consist of "non-qualified publicly offered REIT instruments." If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be

29

---

Table of Contents

required to liquidate from our portfolio or not make otherwise attractive investments in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.

If we fail to invest a sufficient amount of the net proceeds from selling our common stock in real estate assets within one year from the receipt of the proceeds, we could fail to qualify as a REIT.

Temporary investment of the net proceeds from sales of our common stock in short-term securities and income from such investment will generally be qualifying assets and produce qualifying income for purposes of the various REIT income and asset requirements, but only during the one-year period beginning on the date we receive such net proceeds. If we are unable to invest a sufficient amount of the net proceeds from sales of our common stock in qualifying real estate assets within such one-year period, we could fail to satisfy one or more of the gross income or asset tests and/or we could be limited to investing all or a portion of any remaining funds in cash or cash equivalents. If we fail to satisfy any such income or asset test, unless we are entitled to relief under certain provisions of the Code, we could fail to qualify as a REIT.

Recharacterization of sale-leaseback transactions may cause us to lose our REIT status, which would subject us to U.S. federal income tax at corporate rates, which would reduce the amounts available for distribution to our stockholders and threaten our ability to remain qualified as a REIT.

We have and may continue to purchase properties and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. While we will use our best efforts to structure any such sale-leaseback transaction such that the lease will be characterized as a true lease, thereby allowing us to be treated as the owner of the property for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the IRS could challenge such characterization. In the event that any such sale-leaseback is challenged and recharacterized as a financing transaction or loan for U.S. federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such property would be disallowed. If a sale-leaseback transaction were so recharacterized, we might fail to satisfy the REIT qualification asset tests or income tests and, consequently, lose our REIT status effective with the year of recharacterization. Alternatively, the amount of our REIT taxable income could be recalculated, which also might cause us to fail to meet the annual distribution requirement for a taxable year in the event we cannot make a sufficient deficiency dividend.

If our leases are not considered as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we would fail to qualify as a REIT.

To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy two gross income tests, under which specified percentages of our gross income must be derived from certain sources, such as “rents from real property.” In order for rent paid to us to qualify as “rents from real property” for purposes of the REIT gross income tests, the leases must be respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes and not be treated as service contracts, joint ventures, or some other type of arrangement. If our leases are not respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we could fail to qualify as a REIT, which would materially adversely impact the value of an investment in our shares and in our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.

Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect the returns to our investors.

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in shares of our common stock. Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to occur, and we cannot assure you that any such changes will not adversely affect our taxation and our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT or the taxation of a stockholder. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets. Our stockholders are urged to consult with their own tax advisors with respect to the impact of recent legislation on their investment in our shares and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our shares.

Although REITs generally receive better tax treatment than entities taxed as regular corporations, it is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for a company that invests in real estate to elect to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a regular corporation. As a result, our charter provides our board of directors with the power, under certain circumstances, to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election and cause us to be taxed as a regular corporation, without the vote of our stockholders. Our board of directors has fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders and could only cause such changes in our tax treatment if it determines in good faith that such changes are in the best interests of our stockholders.

In addition, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax rules for taxation of individuals and businesses. In addition to reducing corporate and individual tax rates, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminates or restricts various deductions. Most of the changes applicable to individuals are temporary and apply only to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made numerous changes to the tax rules that do not affect the REIT qualification rules directly, but may otherwise affect us or our stockholders.

While the changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act generally appear to be favorable with respect to REITs, the extensive changes to non-REIT provisions in the Internal Revenue Code may have unanticipated effects on us or our stockholders.

30

---

Table of Contents

We urge you to consult with your own tax advisor with respect to the status of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and other legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in shares of our common stock.

Dividends payable by REITs generally are subject to a higher tax rate than regular corporate dividends under current law.

The maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for “qualified dividends” payable to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates generally is 20%. Dividends payable by REITs, however, are generally not eligible for the reduced rates for qualified dividends and are taxed at ordinary income rates. However, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2026, U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates generally may deduct 20% of ordinary dividends from a REIT resulting in an effective maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of 29.6% on such income. Although these rules do not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, to the extent that the reduced rates continue to apply to regular corporate qualified dividends, investors that are individuals, trusts and estates may perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could materially and adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including our common stock.

If our Operating Partnership fails to maintain its status as a partnership, its income may be subject to taxation, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

We intend to maintain the status of our Operating Partnership as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, if the IRS were to successfully challenge the status of our Operating Partnership as a partnership or disregarded entity for such purposes, it would be taxable as a corporation. In such event, this would reduce the amount of distributions that our Operating Partnership could make to us. This would also result in our losing REIT status, and becoming subject to a corporate level tax on our own income. This would substantially reduce our cash available to pay distributions and the yield on our stockholders’ investment. In addition, if any of the partnerships or limited liability companies through which our Operating Partnership owns its properties, in whole or in part, loses its characterization as a partnership and is otherwise not disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes, it would be subject to taxation as a corporation, thereby reducing distributions to our Operating Partnership. Such a recharacterization of an underlying property owner could also threaten our ability to maintain REIT status.

Foreign purchasers of our shares may be subject to FIRPTA tax upon the sale of their shares or upon the payment of a capital gain dividend, which would reduce the net amount they would otherwise realize on their investment in our shares.

A foreign person (other than certain foreign pension plans and certain foreign publicly traded entities) disposing of a U.S. real property interest, including shares of a U.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of U.S. real property interests, is generally subject to the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980, as amended, or FIRPTA, on the gain recognized on the disposition. Such FIRPTA tax does not apply to the disposition of stock in a REIT if the REIT is “domestically controlled.” A REIT is "domestically controlled" if less than 50% of the REIT’s stock, by value, has been owned directly or indirectly by persons who are not qualifying U.S. persons during a continuous five-year period ending on the date of disposition or, if shorter, during the entire period of the REIT’s existence. We cannot assure our stockholders that we will qualify as a "domestically controlled" REIT. If we were to fail to so qualify, any gain realized by foreign investors on a sale of our shares would be subject to FIRPTA tax, unless our shares were traded on an established securities market and the foreign investor did not at any time during a specified testing period directly or indirectly own more than 10% of the value of our outstanding common stock.

A foreign investor also may be subject to FIRPTA tax upon the payment of any capital gain dividend by us, which dividend is attributable to gain from sales or exchanges of U.S. real property interests. We encourage our stockholders to consult their own tax advisor to determine the tax consequences applicable to them if they are a foreign investor.

ERISA Risks

If our assets are deemed to be ERISA plan assets, the Advisor and we may be exposed to liabilities under Title I of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code.

In some circumstances where an Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or ERISA, plan holds an interest in an entity, the assets of the entire entity are deemed to be ERISA plan assets unless an exception applies. This is known as the "look-through rule." Under those circumstances, the obligations and other responsibilities of plan sponsors, plan fiduciaries and plan administrators, and of parties in interest and disqualified persons, under Title I of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code, as applicable, may be applicable, and there may be liability under these and other provisions of ERISA and the Code. We believe that our assets should not be treated as plan assets because the shares should qualify as "publicly-offered securities" that are exempt from the look-through rules under applicable Treasury Regulations. We note, however, that because certain limitations are imposed upon the transferability of shares so that we may qualify as a REIT, and perhaps for other reasons, it is possible that this exemption may not apply. If that is the case, and if the Advisor or we are exposed to liability

31

---

Table of Contents

under ERISA or the Code, our performance and results of operations could be adversely affected. Prior to making an investment in us, you should consult with your legal and other advisors concerning the impact of ERISA and the Code on your investment and our performance.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

32

---

Table of Contents

Item 2. Properties.

Our principal executive offices are located at 4890 West Kennedy Blvd., Suite 650, Tampa, Florida 33609. We do not have an address separate from our Advisor or our Sponsor.

As of December 31, 2019, we owned a portfolio of 152 properties, located in 67 MSAs and two µSAs, comprised of approximately 8,681,000 rentable square feet of commercial space. As of December 31, 2019, 133 of our real estate properties were single-tenant, 18 of our real estate properties were multi-tenant and one of our real estate properties was vacant. As of December 31, 2019, 95.1% of our rentable square feet was leased, with a weighted average remaining lease term of 10.1 years.

Property Statistics

The following table shows the property statistics of our real estate portfolio as of December 31, 2019:

Property Name		MSA/µSA		Segment		Date Acquired		Year Constructed		Year Renovated		Physical Occupancy		Leased Sq Ft			Encumbrances, $ (in thousands)
Houston Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Cy Fair Surgical Center		Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX		Healthcare		07/31/2014		1993		—		100%		13,645			(1)
Cincinnati Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Mercy Healthcare Facility		Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN		Healthcare		10/29/2014		2001		—		100%		14,868			(1)
Winston-Salem Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Winston-Salem, NC IMF		Winston-Salem, NC		Healthcare		12/17/2014		2004		—		100%		22,200			(1)
Stoughton Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. New England Sinai Medical Center		Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH		Healthcare		12/23/2014		1973		1997		100%		180,744			(1)
Fort Worth Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Baylor Surgical Hospital at Fort Worth		Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX		Healthcare		12/31/2014		2014		—		100%		83,464			(1)
Fort Worth Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Baylor Surgical Hospital Integrated Medical Facility		Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX		Healthcare		12/31/2014		2014		—		87%		7,219			(1)
Winter Haven Healthcare Facility		Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL		Healthcare		01/27/2015		2009		—		100%		7,560			(1)
Overland Park Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Heartland Rehabilitation Hospital		Kansas City, MO-KS		Healthcare		02/17/2015		2014		—		100%		54,568			(1)
Indianapolis Data Center		Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN		Data Center		04/01/2015		2000		2014		100%		43,724			(1)
Clarion Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Clarion IMF		Pittsburgh, PA		Healthcare		06/01/2015		2012		—		100%		33,000			(1)
Webster Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Post Acute Webster Rehabilitation Hospital		Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX		Healthcare		06/05/2015		2015		—		100%		53,514			(1)
Eagan Data Center		Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI		Data Center		06/29/2015		1998		2015		100%		87,402			(1)
Houston Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Houston Surgical Hospital and LTACH		Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX		Healthcare		06/30/2015		1950		2005/2008		44%		45,509			—
Augusta Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. KMO IMF - Augusta		Augusta-Waterville, ME (µSA)		Healthcare		07/22/2015		2010		—		100%		51,000			(1)
Cincinnati Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. KMO IMF - Cincinnati I		Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN		Healthcare		07/22/2015		1960		2014		100%		139,428			(1)
Cincinnati Healthcare Facility III, f.k.a. KMO IMF - Cincinnati II		Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN		Healthcare		07/22/2015		2014		—		100%		41,600			(1)
Florence Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. KMO IMF - Florence		Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN		Healthcare		07/22/2015		2014		—		100%		41,600			(1)
Oakland Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. KMO IMF - Oakland		Augusta-Waterville, ME (µSA)		Healthcare		07/22/2015		2014		—		100%		20,000			(1)
Wyomissing Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Reading Surgical Hospital		Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD		Healthcare		07/24/2015		2007		—		100%		33,217			(1)
Luling Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Post Acute Warm Springs Specialty Hospital of Luling		Austin-Round Rock, TX		Healthcare		07/30/2015		2002		—		100%		40,901			(1)
Minnetonka Data Center		Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI		Data Center		08/28/2015		1985		2001/2006 /2012/2015		100%		135,240			(1)
Omaha Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Nebraska Healthcare Facility		Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA		Healthcare		10/14/2015		2014		—		100%		40,402			(1)
Sherman Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Heritage Park - Sherman I		Sherman-Denison, TX		Healthcare		11/20/2015		2005		2010		100%		57,576			(1)
Sherman Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Heritage Park - Sherman II		Sherman-Denison, TX		Healthcare		11/20/2015		2005		—		100%		8,055			(1)

33

---

Table of Contents

Property Name		MSA/µSA		Segment		Date Acquired		Year Constructed		Year Renovated		Physical Occupancy		Leased Sq Ft			Encumbrances, $ (in thousands)
Fort Worth Healthcare Facility III, f.k.a. Baylor Surgery Center at Fort Worth		Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX		Healthcare		12/23/2015		1998		2007/2015		100%		36,800			(1)
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. HPI - Oklahoma City I		Oklahoma City, OK		Healthcare		12/29/2015		1985		1998/2003		100%		94,076			22,259
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. HPI - Oklahoma City II		Oklahoma City, OK		Healthcare		12/29/2015		1994		1999		100%		41,394			(1)
Waco Data Center		Waco, TX		Data Center		12/30/2015		1956		2009		100%		43,596			(1)
Edmond Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. HPI - Edmond		Oklahoma City, OK		Healthcare		01/20/2016		2002		—		100%		17,700			(1)
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility III, f.k.a. HPI - Oklahoma City IV		Oklahoma City, OK		Healthcare		01/27/2016		2006		—		100%		5,000			(1)
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility IV, f.k.a. HPI - Oklahoma City III		Oklahoma City, OK		Healthcare		01/27/2016		2007		—		100%		8,762			(1)
Alpharetta Data Center, f.k.a. Alpharetta Data Center III		Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA		Data Center		02/02/2016		1999		—		100%		77,322			(1)
Flint Data Center		Flint, MI		Data Center		02/02/2016		1989		2016		100%		32,500			(1)
Newcastle Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. HPI - Newcastle		Oklahoma City, OK		Healthcare		02/03/2016		1995		1999		100%		7,424			(1)
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility V, f.k.a. HPI - Oklahoma City V		Oklahoma City, OK		Healthcare		02/11/2016		2008		—		100%		43,676			(1)
Rancho Mirage Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Vibra Rehabilitation Hospital		Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA		Healthcare		03/01/2016		2018		—		100%		47,008			—
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility VI, f.k.a. HPI - Oklahoma City VI		Oklahoma City, OK		Healthcare		03/07/2016		2007		—		100%		14,676			(1)
Franklin Data Center, f.k.a. Tennessee Data Center		Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN		Data Center		03/31/2016		2016		2019		100%		71,726			(1)
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility VII, f.k.a. HPI - Oklahoma City VII		Oklahoma City, OK		Healthcare		06/22/2016		2016		—		100%		102,978			24,547
Las Vegas Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Post Acute Las Vegas Rehabilitation Hospital		Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV		Healthcare		06/24/2016		2017		—		100%		56,220			(1)
Somerset Data Center		New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA		Data Center		06/29/2016		1978		2016		100%		36,118			(1)
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility VIII, f.k.a. Integris Lakeside Women's Hospital		Oklahoma City, OK		Healthcare		06/30/2016		1997		2008		100%		62,857			(1)
Hawthorne Data Center, f.k.a. AT&T Hawthorne Data Center		Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA		Data Center		09/27/2016		1963		1983/2001		100%		288,000			39,749
McLean Data Center, f.k.a. McLean I		Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV		Data Center		10/17/2016		1966		1998		95%		65,794			23,460
McLean Data Center II, f.k.a. McLean II		Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV		Data Center		10/17/2016		1991		2019		100%		62,002			27,540
Marlton Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Select Medical Rehabilitation Facility		Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD		Healthcare		11/01/2016		1995		—		100%		89,139			31,145
Andover Data Center, f.k.a. Andover Data Center II		Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH		Data Center		11/08/2016		2000		—		100%		153,000			(1)
Grand Rapids Healthcare Facility		Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI		Healthcare		12/07/2016		2008		—		83%		88,821			21,766
Corpus Christi Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Corpus Christi Surgery Center		Corpus Christi, TX		Healthcare		12/22/2016		1992		—		100%		25,102			(1)
Chicago Data Center, f.k.a. Chicago Data Center II		Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI		Data Center		12/28/2016		1987		2016		100%		115,352			(1)
Blythewood Data Center		Columbia, SC		Data Center		12/29/2016		1983		—		100%		64,637			(1)
Tempe Data Center		Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ		Data Center		01/26/2017		1977		2016		100%		44,244			(1)
Aurora Healthcare Facility		Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI		Healthcare		03/30/2017		2002		—		100%		24,722			(1)
Norwalk Data Center		Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT		Data Center		03/30/2017		2013		—		100%		167,691			34,200

34

---

Table of Contents

Property Name		MSA/µSA		Segment		Date Acquired		Year Constructed		Year Renovated		Physical Occupancy		Leased Sq Ft			Encumbrances, $ (in thousands)
Allen Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Texas Rehab - Allen		Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX		Healthcare		03/31/2017		2007		—		100%		42,627			13,136
Austin Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Texas Rehab - Austin		Austin-Round Rock, TX		Healthcare		03/31/2017		2012		—		100%		66,095			20,861
Beaumont Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Texas Rehab - Beaumont		Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX		Healthcare		03/31/2017		1991		—		100%		61,000			5,863
Charlotte Data Center, f.k.a. Charlotte Data Center II		Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC		Data Center		05/15/2017		1989		2016		100%		52,924			(1)
Atlanta Data Center, f.k.a. 250 Williams Atlanta Data Center		Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA		Data Center		06/15/2017		1989		2007		89%		886,740			116,200
Sunnyvale Data Center		San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA		Data Center		06/28/2017		1992		1998		100%		76,573			(1)
San Antonio Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Texas Rehab - San Antonio		San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX		Healthcare		06/29/2017		2012		—		100%		44,746			10,490
Cincinnati Data Center		Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN		Data Center		06/30/2017		1985		2010		100%		69,826			(1)
Silverdale Healthcare Facility		Bremerton-Silverdale, WA		Healthcare		08/25/2017		2005		—		100%		25,892			(1)
Silverdale Healthcare Facility II		Bremerton-Silverdale, WA		Healthcare		09/20/2017		2007		—		100%		19,184			(1)
King of Prussia Data Center		Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD		Data Center		09/28/2017		1960		1997		100%		50,000			11,961
Tempe Data Center II		Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ		Data Center		09/29/2017		1998		—		100%		58,560			(1)
Houston Data Center		Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX		Data Center		11/16/2017		2013		—		100%		103,200			48,607
Saginaw Healthcare Facility		Saginaw, MI		Healthcare		12/21/2017		2002		—		100%		87,843			(1)
Elgin Data Center		Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI		Data Center		12/22/2017		2000		—		100%		65,745			5,561
Oklahoma City Data Center		Oklahoma City, OK		Data Center		12/27/2017		2008/2016		—		100%		92,456			(1)
Rancho Cordova Data Center, f.k.a. Rancho Cordova Data Center I		Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, CA		Data Center		03/14/2018		1982		2008/2010		100%		69,048			(1)
Rancho Cordova Data Center II		Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, CA		Data Center		03/14/2018		1984		2012		63%		40,394			(1)
Carrollton Healthcare Facility		Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX		Healthcare		04/27/2018		2015		—		100%		21,990			(1)
Katy Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Oceans Katy Behavioral Health Hospital		Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX		Healthcare		06/08/2018		2015		—		100%		34,296			(1)
San Jose Data Center		San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA		Data Center		06/13/2018		1999		2009		100%		76,410			(1)
Indianola Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Indianola Healthcare I		Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA		Healthcare		09/26/2018		2014		—		100%		18,116			(1)
Indianola Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Indianola Healthcare II		Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA		Healthcare		09/26/2018		2011		—		100%		20,990			(1)
Canton Data Center		Canton-Massillon, OH		Data Center		10/03/2018		2008		—		100%		29,960			(1)
Benton Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Benton Healthcare I (Benton)		Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR		Healthcare		10/17/2018		1992/1999		—		100%		104,419			(1)
Benton Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Benton Healthcare III (Benton)		Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR		Healthcare		10/17/2018		1983		—		100%		11,350			(1)
Bryant Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Benton Healthcare II (Bryant)		Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR		Healthcare		10/17/2018		1995		—		100%		23,450			(1)
Hot Springs Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Benton Healthcare IV (Hot Springs)		Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR		Healthcare		10/17/2018		2009		—		100%		8,573			(1)
Clive Healthcare Facility		Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA		Healthcare		11/26/2018		2008		—		100%		58,156			(1)
Valdosta Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Valdosta Healthcare I		Valdosta, GA		Healthcare		11/28/2018		2004		—		100%		24,750			(1)
Valdosta Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Valdosta Healthcare II		Valdosta, GA		Healthcare		11/28/2018		1992		—		100%		12,745			(1)
Bryant Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Bryant Healthcare Facility		Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR		Healthcare		08/16/2019		2016		—		100%		16,154			(1)
Laredo Healthcare Facility		Laredo, TX		Healthcare		09/19/2019		1998		—		100%		61,677			(1)
Laredo Healthcare Facility II		Laredo, TX		Healthcare		09/19/2019		1998		—		100%		118,132			(1)
Poplar Bluff Healthcare Facility		Poplar Bluff, MO (µSA)		Healthcare		09/19/2019		2013		—		100%		71,519			(1)
Tucson Healthcare Facility		Tucson, AZ		Healthcare		09/19/2019		1998		—		100%		34,009			(1)
Akron Healthcare Facility		Akron, OH		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2012		—		100%		98,705			(1)
Akron Healthcare Facility II		Akron, OH		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2013		—		100%		38,564			(1)

35

---

Table of Contents

Property Name		MSA/µSA		Segment		Date Acquired		Year Constructed		Year Renovated		Physical Occupancy		Leased Sq Ft			Encumbrances, $ (in thousands)
Akron Healthcare Facility III		Akron, OH		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2008		—		100%		54,000			(1)
Alexandria Healthcare Facility		Alexandria, LA		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2007		—		100%		15,600			(1)
Appleton Healthcare Facility		Appleton, WI		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2011		—		100%		7,552			(1)
Austin Healthcare Facility II		Austin-Round Rock, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2006		—		100%		18,275			(1)
Bellevue Healthcare Facility		Green Bay, WI		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2010		—		100%		5,838			(1)
Bonita Springs Healthcare Facility		Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2002		2005		100%		9,800			(1)
Bridgeton Healthcare Facility		St. Louis, MO-IL		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2012		—		100%		66,914			(1)
Covington Healthcare Facility		New Orleans-Metairie, LA		Healthcare		10/04/2019		1984		—		100%		43,250			(1)
Crestview Healthcare Facility		Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2004		2010		100%		5,685			(1)
Dallas Healthcare Facility		Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2010		—		100%		62,390			(1)
Dallas Healthcare Facility II		Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		1983		2013		—%		—			—
De Pere Healthcare Facility		Green Bay, WI		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2005		—		100%		7,100			(1)
Denver Healthcare Facility		Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO		Healthcare		10/04/2019		1962		2018		100%		131,210			(1)
El Segundo Healthcare Facility		Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2009		—		100%		12,163			(1)
Fairlea Healthcare Facility		Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV		Healthcare		10/04/2019		1999		—		100%		5,200			(1)
Fayetteville Healthcare Facility		Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO		Healthcare		10/04/2019		1994		2009		100%		55,740			(1)
Fort Myers Healthcare Facility		Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL		Healthcare		10/04/2019		1999		—		100%		32,148			(1)
Fort Myers Healthcare Facility II		Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2010		—		100%		47,089			(1)
Fort Walton Beach Healthcare Facility		Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2005		—		100%		9,017			(1)
Frankfort Healthcare Facility		Lexington-Fayette, KY		Healthcare		10/04/2019		1993		—		100%		4,000			(1)
Frisco Healthcare Facility		Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2010		—		100%		45,500			(1)
Goshen Healthcare Facility		Elkhart-Goshen, IN		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2010		—		100%		15,462			(1)
Grapevine Healthcare Facility		Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2007		—		100%		61,400			—
Hammond Healthcare Facility		Hammond, LA		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2006		—		100%		63,000			(1)
Hammond Healthcare Facility II		Hammond, LA		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2004		—		100%		23,835			(1)
Harlingen Healthcare Facility		Brownsville-Harlingen, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2007		—		100%		38,111			—
Henderson Healthcare Facility		Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2000		—		100%		6,685			(1)
Houston Healthcare Facility III		Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		1998		2018		100%		16,217			(1)
Howard Healthcare Facility		Green Bay, WI		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2011		—		100%		7,552			(1)
Jacksonville Healthcare Facility		Jacksonville, FL		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2009		—		100%		13,082			(1)
Lafayette Healthcare Facility		Lafayette, LA		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2004		—		100%		73,824			(1)
Lakewood Ranch Healthcare Facility		North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, FL		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2008		—		100%		10,919			(1)
Las Vegas Healthcare Facility II		Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2007		—		100%		6,963			(1)
Lehigh Acres Healthcare Facility		Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2002		—		100%		5,746			(1)
Lubbock Healthcare Facility		Lubbock, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2003		—		100%		102,143			(1)
Manitowoc Healthcare Facility		Green Bay, WI		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2003		—		100%		7,987			(1)
Manitowoc Healthcare Facility II		Green Bay, WI		Healthcare		10/04/2019		1964		2010		100%		36,090			(1)
Marinette Healthcare Facility		Green Bay, WI		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2008		—		100%		4,178			(1)
New Bedford Healthcare Facility		Providence-Warwick, RI-MA		Healthcare		10/04/2019		1942		1995		100%		70,657			(1)
New Braunfels Healthcare Facility		San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2007		—		100%		27,971			(1)
North Smithfield Healthcare Facility		Providence-Warwick, RI-MA		Healthcare		10/04/2019		1965		2000		100%		92,944			(1)
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility IX		Oklahoma City, OK		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2007		—		100%		34,970			(1)
Oshkosh Healthcare Facility		Oshkosh-Neenah, WI		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2010		—		100%		8,717			(1)
Palm Desert Healthcare Facility		Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2005		—		100%		6,963			(1)

36

---

Table of Contents

Property Name		MSA/µSA		Segment		Date Acquired		Year Constructed		Year Renovated		Physical Occupancy		Leased Sq Ft			Encumbrances, $ (in thousands)
Rancho Mirage Healthcare Facility II		Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2008		—		100%		7,432			(1)
San Antonio Healthcare Facility II		San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2013		—		100%		82,316			—
San Antonio Healthcare Facility III		San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2012		—		100%		50,000			(1)
San Antonio Healthcare Facility IV		San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		1987		—		100%		113,136			(1)
San Antonio Healthcare Facility V		San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2017		—		81%		47,091			(1)
Santa Rosa Beach Healthcare Facility		Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2003		—		100%		5,000			(1)
Savannah Healthcare Facility		Savannah, GA		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2014		—		100%		48,184			(1)
St. Louis Healthcare Facility		St. Louis, MO-IL		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2005		2007		100%		21,823			(1)
Sturgeon Bay Healthcare Facility		Green Bay, WI		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2007		—		100%		3,100			(1)
Victoria Healthcare Facility		Victoria, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2013		—		100%		34,297			(1)
Victoria Healthcare Facility II		Victoria, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		1998		—		100%		28,752			(1)
Webster Healthcare Facility II		Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2014		2019		100%		373,070			(1)
Wilkes-Barre Healthcare Facility		Scranton–Wilkes-Barre–Hazleton, PA		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2012		—		100%		15,996			(1)
Yucca Valley Healthcare Facility		Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA		Healthcare		10/04/2019		2009		—		100%		12,240			(1)
Tucson Healthcare Facility II		Tucson, AZ		Healthcare		12/26/2019		(2)		(2)		—%		—			—
Tucson Healthcare Facility III		Tucson, AZ		Healthcare		12/27/2019		(2)		(2)		—%		—			—
														8,257,915			$457,345

(1)	Property collateralized under our credit facility. As of December 31, 2019, 128 commercial real estate properties were collateralized under our credit facility and we had an outstanding principal balance of $908,000,000.

(2)	Property under construction as of December 31, 2019.

We believe the properties are adequately covered by insurance and are suitable for their respective intended purposes. Real estate assets, other than land, are depreciated on a straight-line basis over each asset's useful life. Tenant improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their respective lease term or expected useful life.

Leases

Although there are variations in the specific terms of the leases in our portfolio, the following is a summary of the general structure of our leases. Generally, the leases of our properties provide for initial terms ranging from 10 to 20 years. As of December 31, 2019, the weighted average remaining lease term of our properties was 10.1 years. The properties generally are leased under net leases pursuant to which the tenant bears responsibility for substantially all property costs and expenses associated with ongoing maintenance and operation, including utilities, property taxes and insurance. Certain leases provide for fixed increases in rent. Generally, the property leases provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options, subject to generally the same terms and conditions as the initial lease term.

37

---

Table of Contents

The following table shows lease expirations of our real properties based on annualized contractual base rent as of December 31, 2019 and for each of the next ten years ending December 31 and thereafter, as follows:

Year of Lease Expiration		Total Number of Leases			Leased Sq Ft			Annualized Contractual Base Rent (in thousands) (1)				Percentage of Annualized Contractual Base Rent
2020		17			75,972			$	1,936			0.9	%
2021		4			4,262			191				0.1	%
2022		12			301,474			5,880				2.7	%
2023		12			161,392			4,459				2.0	%
2024		27			512,546			15,278				6.9	%
2025		12			583,527			16,994				7.7	%
2026		16			783,055			18,219				8.2	%
2027		14			733,736			20,685				9.4	%
2028		10			255,068			5,546				2.5	%
2029		18			791,469			15,187				6.9	%
Thereafter		63			4,055,414			116,169				52.7	%
		205			8,257,915			$	220,544			100.0	%

(1)	Annualized contractual base rent is based on contractual base rent from leases in effect as of December 31, 2019.

Indebtedness

For a discussion of our indebtedness, see Note 9—"Notes Payable" and Note 10—"Credit Facility" to the consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

We are not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which our properties are the subject. See Note 18—"Commitments and Contingencies" to the consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

38

---

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Stockholder Information

As of March 24, 2020, we had approximately 221.4 million shares of common stock outstanding, held by a total of 62,647 stockholders of record. The number of stockholders is based on the records of DST Systems, Inc., who serves as our registrar and transfer agent.

Market Information

There is no established trading market for our common stock. Therefore, there is a risk that a stockholder may not be able to sell our stock at a time or price acceptable to the stockholder, or at all. Unless and until our shares are listed on a national securities exchange, we do not expect that a public market for the shares will develop.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the offering price for the shares in the DRIP Offering was $9.25 per Class A share, $9.25 per Class I share, $9.25 per Class T share, and $9.25 per Class T2 share, which is equal to the estimated per share NAV, as determined by our board of directors on September 27, 2018, or the 2018 Estimated Per Share NAV. Effective January 1, 2020, we are offering shares of our common stock to our stockholders pursuant to the current DRIP Offering at a price of $8.65 per Class A share, $8.65 per Class I share, $8.65 per Class T share, and $8.65 per Class T2 share, which is equal to the Estimated Per Share NAV, as determined by our board of directors on December 17, 2019.

We will continue to issue shares of Class A common stock, Class I common stock, Class T common stock, and Class T2 common stock under the current DRIP Offering until such time as we sell all of the shares registered for sale under the current DRIP Offering, unless we file a new registration statement with the SEC or the current DRIP Offering is terminated by our board of directors. We will issue such shares at the applicable Estimated Per Share NAV.

Pursuant to the terms of our charter, certain restrictions are imposed on the ownership and transfer of shares.

To assist the FINRA members and their associated persons that participated in our public offerings of common stock, pursuant to FINRA Rule 5110 and NASD Conduct Rule 2340, we disclose in each annual report distributed to stockholders a per share estimated value of the shares, the method by which it was developed, and the date of the data used to develop the estimated value. In addition, our Advisor will prepare annual statements of estimated share values to assist fiduciaries of retirement plans subject to the annual reporting requirements of ERISA in the preparation of their reports relating to an investment in our shares. For these purposes, the Estimated Per Share NAV of our common shares was $8.65 as of December 31, 2019. However, as set forth above, there is no public trading market for the shares at this time and stockholders may not receive $8.65 per share if a market did exist.

The Estimated Per Share NAV was approved by our board of directors, at the recommendation of the Audit Committee, on December 17, 2019, using a methodology that conformed to standard industry practice. In determining the 2018 Estimated Per Share NAV and the Estimated Per Share NAV, our board of directors considered information and analyses, including valuation materials that were provided by Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc., information provided by our Advisor and the recommendation of the Audit Committee. See our Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 19, 2019 and October 1, 2018, respectively, for additional information regarding Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc. and its valuation materials and the methodology used to determine the 2018 Estimated Per Share NAV and the Estimated Per Share NAV.

Share Repurchase Program

Prior to the time that our shares are listed on a national securities exchange, if ever, our share repurchase program, as described below, may provide eligible stockholders with limited, interim liquidity by enabling them to sell shares back to us, subject to restrictions and applicable law. We are not obligated to repurchase shares under our share repurchase program.

In connection with entering into the Merger Agreement, on April 10, 2019, our board of directors approved the Sixth Amended & Restated Share Repurchase Program, or the Sixth Amended & Restated SRP, which became effective on May 11, 2019, and was applied beginning with repurchases made on the 2019 third quarter Repurchase Date. Under the Sixth Amended & Restated SRP, we only repurchased shares of common stock (Class A shares, Class I shares, Class T Shares and Class T2 shares) in connection with the death, qualifying disability, or involuntary exigent circumstance (as determined by our board of directors in its sole discretion) of a stockholder, subject to certain terms and conditions specified in the Sixth Amended & Restated SRP.

39

---

Table of Contents

On October 2, 2019, in connection with the REIT Merger, our board of directors approved the Amended SRP. The Amended SRP applied to all eligible stockholders, beginning with repurchases made on the first quarter repurchase date of 2020, which was January 30, 2020.

Holding Period. Generally, a stockholder must have beneficially held its Class A shares, Class I shares, Class T shares, or Class T2 shares, as applicable, for at least one year prior to offering them for sale to us through our share repurchase program. A stockholder or his or her estate, heir or beneficiary may present to us fewer than all of the shares owned for repurchase.

a. Former Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. Stockholders. For purposes of determining whether any former Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc., or CVREIT, stockholder qualifies for participation under our share repurchase program, former CVREIT stockholders will receive full credit for the time they held CVREIT common stock prior to the consummation of our merger with CVREIT.

b. Distribution Reinvestment Plan. In the event that we repurchase all of one stockholder’s shares, any shares that the stockholder purchased pursuant to our DRIP will be excluded from the one-year holding requirement. In the event that a stockholder requests a repurchase of all of its shares, and such stockholder is participating in the DRIP, the stockholder will be deemed to have notified us, at the time the stockholder submits the repurchase request, that the stockholder is terminating participation in the DRIP and has elected to receive future distributions in cash. This election will continue in effect even if less than all of the stockholder’s shares are accepted for repurchase unless the stockholder notifies us that the stockholder wishes to resume participation in the DRIP.

c. Death of a Stockholder. Subject to the conditions and limitations described within the Amended SRP, we may repurchase shares held for less than one year upon the death of a stockholder who is a natural person, including shares held by such stockholder through an IRA or other retirement or profit-sharing plan, after receiving written notice from the estate of the stockholder or the recipient of the shares through bequest or inheritance within 18 months from the date of death. If spouses are joint registered holders of the shares, the request to repurchase the shares may be made only if both registered holders die. The waiver of the one-year holding period will not apply to a stockholder that is not a natural person, such as a trust, partnership, corporation or other similar entity.

d. Qualifying Disability. Subject to the conditions and limitations described within the Amended SRP, we will repurchase shares held for less than one year requested by a stockholder who is a natural person, including shares of our common stock held by such stockholder through an IRA or other retirement or profit-sharing plan, with a “Qualifying Disability” as defined within the Amended SRP, after receiving written notice from such stockholder within 18 months from the date of the qualifying disability, provided that the condition causing the qualifying disability was not pre-existing on the date that the stockholder became a stockholder. The waiver of the one-year holding period will not apply to a stockholder that is not a natural person, such as a trust, partnership, corporation, or similar entity.

e. Involuntary Exigent Circumstance. Our board of directors may, in its sole discretion, waive the one-year holding period requirement for stockholders who demonstrate, in the discretion of our board of directors, an involuntary exigent circumstance, such as bankruptcy.

Purchase Price. The purchase price for shares repurchased under our share repurchase program will be 100% of the most recent estimated NAV per share of the Class A common stock, Class I common stock, Class T common stock or Class T2 common stock, as applicable (in each case, as adjusted for any stock dividends, combinations, splits, recapitalizations and the like with respect to our common stock). Our board of directors will adjust the estimated NAV per share of each our classes of common stock if we have made one or more special distributions to stockholders. Our board of directors will determine, in its sole discretion, which distributions, if any, constitute a special distribution.

Repurchases of Shares. Repurchases of our shares of common stock are at our discretion and generally will be made quarterly upon written request to us by the last day of the applicable quarter. Valid repurchase requests will be honored approximately 30 days following the end of the applicable quarter, which we refer to as the “Repurchase Date.” Stockholders may withdraw their repurchase request at any time up to 15 days prior to the Repurchase Date. If a repurchase request is granted, we or our agent will send the repurchase amount to each stockholder or heir, beneficiary or estate of a stockholder on or about the Repurchase Date.

Repurchase Limitations. We will determine whether we have sufficient funds and/or shares available as soon as practicable after the end of each fiscal quarter, but in any event prior to the applicable Repurchase Date.

a. 5% Share Limitation. During any calendar year, we will not repurchase in excess of 5.0% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding on December 31st of the previous calendar year, or the 5% Share Limitation.

b. Quarterly Share Limitations. We limit the number of shares repurchased each quarter pursuant to our share repurchase program as follows (subject to the DRIP Funding Limitation (as defined below)):

40

---

Table of Contents

•	On the first quarter Repurchase Date, which generally will be January 30 of the applicable year, we will not repurchase in excess of 1.25% of the number of shares outstanding on December 31st of the previous calendar year;

•	On the second quarter Repurchase Date, which generally will be April 30 of the applicable year, we will not repurchase in excess of 1.25% of the number of shares outstanding on December 31st of the previous calendar year;

•	On the third quarter Repurchase Date, which generally will be July 30 of the applicable year, we will not repurchase in excess of 1.25% of the number of shares outstanding on December 31st of the previous calendar year; and

•	On the fourth quarter Repurchase Date, which generally will be October 30 of the applicable year, we will not repurchase in excess of 1.25% of the number of shares outstanding on December 31st of the previous calendar year.

In the event we do not repurchase 1.25% of the number of shares outstanding on December 31st of the previous calendar year in any particular quarter, we will increase the limitation on the number of shares to be repurchased in the next quarter and continue to adjust the quarterly limitations as necessary in accordance with the 5% annual limitation.

c.    DRIP Funding Limitations. We intend to fund our share repurchase program with proceeds we received during the prior year ended December 31 from the sale of shares pursuant to the DRIP. We will limit the amount of DRIP proceeds used to fund share repurchases in each quarter to 25% of the amount of DRIP proceeds received during the previous calendar year, or the DRIP Funding Limitation; provided, however, that if we do not reach the DRIP Funding Limitation in any particular quarter, we will apply the remaining DRIP proceeds to the next quarter Repurchase Date and continue to adjust the quarterly limitations as necessary in order to use all of the available DRIP proceeds for a calendar year, if needed. We cannot guarantee that DRIP proceeds will be sufficient to accommodate all requests made each quarter. Our board of directors may, in its sole discretion, reserve other operating funds to fund the share repurchase program, but is not required to reserve such funds.

As a result of the limitations described in (a) – (c) above, some or all of a stockholder’s shares may not be repurchased. Each quarter, we will process repurchase requests made in connection with the death or Qualifying Disability of a stockholder, or, in the discretion of the Board, an involuntary exigent circumstance, such as bankruptcy, prior to processing any other repurchase requests. If we are unable to process all eligible repurchase requests within a quarter due to the limitations described above or in the event sufficient funds are not available, shares will be repurchased as follows: (i) first, pro rata as to repurchases upon the death or Qualifying Disability of a stockholder; (ii) next, pro rata as to repurchases to stockholders who demonstrate, in the discretion of our board of directors, an involuntary exigent circumstance, such as bankruptcy; (iii) next, pro rata as to repurchases to stockholders subject to a mandatory distribution requirement under such stockholder’s IRA; and (iv) finally, pro rata as to all other repurchase requests.

If we do not repurchase all of the shares for which repurchase requests were submitted in any quarter, all outstanding repurchase requests will automatically roll over to the subsequent quarter and priority will be given to the repurchase requests in the subsequent quarter as provided above. A stockholder or his or her estate, heir or beneficiary, as applicable, may withdraw a repurchase request in whole or in part at any time up to 15 days prior to the Repurchase Date.

Deadline for Presentment. A stockholder who wishes to have shares repurchased must mail or deliver to us a written request on a form provided by us and executed by the stockholder, its trustee or authorized agent, which we must receive by the last day of the quarter in which the stockholder is requesting a repurchase of his or her shares. An estate, heir or beneficiary that wishes to have shares repurchased following the death of a stockholder must mail or deliver to us a written request on a form provided by us, including evidence acceptable to our board of directors of the death of the stockholder, and executed by the executor or executrix of the estate, the heir or beneficiary, or their trustee or authorized agent, which we must receive by the last day of the quarter in which the estate, heir, or beneficiary is requesting a repurchase of its shares.

No Encumbrances. All shares presented for repurchase must be owned by the stockholder(s) making the presentment, or the party presenting the shares must be authorized to do so by the owner(s) of the shares. Such shares must be fully transferable and not subject to any liens or encumbrances. Upon receipt of a request for repurchase, we may conduct a Uniform Commercial Code search to ensure that no liens are held against the shares. Any costs in conducting the Uniform Commercial Code search will be borne by us.

Account Minimum. In the event any stockholder fails to maintain a minimum balance of  $2,000 of Class A shares, Class I shares, Class T shares, or Class T2 shares, we may repurchase all of the shares held by that stockholder at the NAV per share repurchase price in effect on the date we determine that the stockholder has failed to meet the minimum balance.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we repurchased 2,557,298 Class A shares, Class I shares, Class T shares and Class T2 shares of common stock (1,910,894 Class A shares, 189,947 Class I shares, 451,058 Class T shares and 5,399 Class

41

---

Table of Contents

T2 shares) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $23,655,000 (an average of $9.25 per share) under our share repurchase program. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repurchased 4,700,554 Class A shares, Class I shares and Class T shares of common stock (4,117,566 Class A shares, 71,180 Class I shares and 511,808 Class T shares) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $43,230,000 (an average of $9.20 per share) under our share repurchase program.

During the three months ended December 31, 2019, we fulfilled the following repurchase requests pursuant to our share repurchase program:

Period		Total Number of Shares Repurchased			Average Price Paid per Share				Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans and Programs			Approximate Dollar Value of Shares Available that may yet be Repurchased under the Program
October 2019		112,185			$	9.25			—			$	—
November 2019		15,868			$	9.25			—			$	—
December 2019		10,485			$	9.25			—			$	—
Total		138,538							—

During the three months ended December 31, 2019, we repurchased approximately $1,281,000 of Class A shares and Class T shares of common stock. 

Stockholders

As of March 24, 2020, we had approximately 166,408,000 shares of Class A common stock, 12,544,000 shares of Class I common stock, 38,939,000 shares of Class T common stock and 3,496,000 of Class T2 common stock outstanding held by 62,647 stockholders of record.

Distributions

We are taxed and qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. As a REIT, we make distributions each taxable year equal to at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding capital gains). One of our primary goals is to continue to pay monthly distributions to our stockholders. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we paid aggregate distributions of $89.4 million to Class A, Class I, Class T and Class T2 stockholders ($49.5 million in cash and $39.9 million reinvested in shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP). For the year ended December 31, 2018, we paid aggregate distributions of $81.2 million to Class A, Class I, Class T and Class T2 stockholders ($40.3 million in cash and $40.9 million reinvested in shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP).

42

---

Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The following should be read in conjunction with Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.

The selected financial data presented below was derived from our consolidated financial statements (amounts in thousands, except share and per share data):

		As of and for the Year Ended   December 31,
Selected Financial Data		2019				2018				2017				2016				2015
Balance Sheet Data:
Total real estate, net		$	2,768,462			$	1,673,732			$	1,505,405			$	897,000			$	410,514
Cash and cash equivalents		$	69,342			$	68,360			$	74,803			$	50,446			$	31,262
Acquired intangible assets, net		$	285,459			$	154,204			$	150,554			$	98,053			$	54,633
Total assets		$	3,239,534			$	1,963,829			$	1,777,944			$	1,070,038			$	506,627
Notes payable, net		$	454,845			$	464,345			$	463,742			$	151,045			$	—
Credit facility, net		$	900,615			$	352,511			$	219,399			$	219,124			$	89,897
Total liabilities		$	1,501,115			$	916,444			$	787,393			$	401,610			$	106,291
Total equity		$	1,738,419			$	1,047,385			$	990,551			$	668,428			$	400,336
Operating Data:
Rental revenue		$	210,901			$	177,333			$	125,087			$	56,427			$	21,279
Rental expenses		$	40,984			$	37,327			$	26,096			$	8,164			$	2,836
Asset management fees		$	16,475			$	13,114			$	9,963			$	4,925			$	1,895
Depreciation and amortization		$	74,104			$	58,258			$	41,133			$	19,211			$	7,053
Impairment loss on real estate		$	21,000			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
Income (loss) from operations		$	49,996			$	63,238			$	43,826			$	15,683			$	(2,888	)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders		$	2,782			$	28,873			$	21,279			$	11,297			$	(4,767	)
Funds from operations attributable to common stockholders (1)		$	97,807			$	87,131			$	62,412			$	30,508			$	2,286
Modified funds from operations attributable to common stockholders (1)		$	79,929			$	69,585			$	49,941			$	28,940			$	10,015
Per Share Data:
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic		$	0.02			$	0.22			$	0.21			$	0.17			$	(0.17	)
Diluted		$	0.02			$	0.22			$	0.21			$	0.17			$	(0.17	)
Distributions declared for common stock		91,204				81,985				63,488				42,336				18,245
Distributions declared per common share		$	0.58			$	0.63			$	0.62			$	0.63			$	0.64
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic		157,247,345				131,040,645				101,714,148				66,991,294				28,658,495
Diluted		157,271,668				131,064,388				101,731,944				67,007,124				28,658,495
Cash Flow Data:
Net cash provided by operating activities		$	80,109			$	74,211			$	51,827			$	24,975			$	3,290
Net cash used in investing activities		$	(538,318	)		$	(232,815	)		$	(636,693	)		$	(543,547	)		$	(375,528	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		$	458,912			$	152,384			$	613,704			$	542,292			$	398,811

(1)	Refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations” for a discussion of our funds from operations and modified funds from operations and for a reconciliation on these non-GAAP financial measures to net income attributable to common stockholders.

43

---

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed below and elsewhere in this report, particularly under “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements.” All forward-looking statements in this document are based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.

This section of the Annual Report on Form 10-K generally discusses 2019 and 2018 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2019 and 2018. A discussion of the changes in our financial condition and results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017 has been omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to amendments as a result of the 2015 Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act, but may be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on March 22, 2019.

Overview

We were formed on January 11, 2013, under the laws of Maryland to acquire and operate a diversified portfolio of income-producing commercial real estate with a focus on data centers and healthcare properties, preferably with long-term net leases to creditworthy tenants, as well as to make real estate-related investments that relate to such property types.

We raised the equity capital for our real estate investments through two public offerings from May 2014 through November 2018, and we have offered shares pursuant to our DRIP Offerings since November 2017. As of December 31, 2019, we had accepted investors’ subscriptions for and issued approximately 147,707,000 shares of Class A, Class I, Class T and Class T2 common stock in our Offerings, resulting in receipt of gross proceeds of approximately $1,437,115,000, before share repurchases of $87,469,000, selling commissions and dealer manager fees of approximately $96,734,000 and other offering costs of approximately $27,578,000.

On December 17, 2019, our board of directors, at the recommendation of our audit committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, established the Estimated Per Share NAV, calculated as of October 31, 2019, of $8.65. Therefore, effective January 1, 2020, shares of common stock are offered pursuant to the Second DRIP Offering for a price per share of $8.65.

We intend to establish an estimated per share net asset value, or the Estimated Per Share NAV, on at least an annual basis. Each Estimated Per Share NAV was determined by our board of directors after consultation with our Advisor, and an independent third-party valuation firm. The Estimated Per Share NAV is not subject to audit by our independent registered public accounting firm. The following table outlines the established Estimated Per Share NAV as determined by our board of directors for the last three years as of each valuation date presented below:

Valuation Date		Effective Date		Estimated Per Share NAV
June 30, 2017		October 1, 2017		$9.18
June 30, 2018		October 1, 2018		$9.25
October 31, 2019		December 18, 2019		$8.65

Substantially all of our operations are conducted through our Operating Partnership. We are externally advised by our Advisor, which is our affiliate, pursuant to an advisory agreement by and among us, our Operating Partnership and our Advisor. Our Advisor supervises and manages our day-to-day operations and selects the properties and real estate-related investments we acquire, subject to the oversight and approval of our board of directors. Our Advisor also provides marketing, sales and client services related to real estate on our behalf. Our Advisor engages affiliated entities to provide various services to us. Our Advisor is managed by, and is a subsidiary of, our Sponsor. We have no paid employees and we rely on our Advisor to provide substantially all of our services.

Our Advisor and our Property Manager received, and will continue to receive, fees during the acquisition and operational stages and our Advisor may be eligible to receive fees during our liquidation stage. SC Distributors, LLC, an affiliate of the Advisor, or the Dealer Manager, served as the dealer manager of our Offerings. The Dealer Manager received fees for services related to the Offerings. We continue to pay the Dealer Manager a distribution and servicing fee with respect to Class T and Class T2 shares that were sold in our Offerings.

44

---

Table of Contents

We currently operate through two reportable segments – commercial real estate investments in data centers and healthcare. As of December 31, 2019, we had purchased 152 properties, inclusive of 60 properties acquired in the REIT Merger on October 4, 2019, or Legacy REIT I properties, comprising of approximately 8,681,000 of rentable square feet for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $3,130.0 million.

As of December 31, 2019, we sold one of three buildings and a portion of land related to one healthcare property for an aggregate sale price of $3.1 million and generated net proceeds of $2.9 million.

Completion of Merger with Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc.

On April 11, 2019, we, along with REIT I, our Operating Partnership, the REIT I Operating Partnership, and Merger Sub, entered into the Merger Agreement.

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, on October 4, 2019, REIT I merged with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub surviving the REIT Merger, such that following the REIT Merger, the Surviving Entity continued as our wholly-owned subsidiary. In accordance with the applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, the separate existence of REIT I ceased.

At the effective time of the REIT Merger, each issued and outstanding share of REIT I’s common stock (or a fraction thereof), $0.01 par value per share was converted into the right to receive:

(i)	$1.00 in cash; and

(ii)	0.4681 shares of our Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share.

The Combined Company after the REIT Merger retained the name “Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc.” The REIT Merger is intended to qualify as a “reorganization” under, and within the meaning of, the Code.

The total consideration transferred for the REIT Merger to REIT I stockholders was approximately $952.8 million consisting of $178.8 million in cash and $774.0 million in equity.

Critical Accounting Policies

We believe that the following discussion addresses the most critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments.

Purchase Price Allocation

Upon the acquisition of real properties, we evaluate whether the acquisition is a business combination or an asset acquisition. For both business combinations and asset acquisitions we allocate the purchase price of properties to acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, buildings and improvements, and acquired intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases and the value of in-place leases. For asset acquisitions, we capitalize transaction costs and allocate the purchase price using a relative fair value method allocating all accumulated costs. For business combinations, we expense transaction costs incurred and allocate the purchase price based on the estimated fair value of each separately identifiable asset and liability.

The fair values of the tangible assets of an acquired property (which include land, buildings and improvements) are determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and buildings and improvements based on our determination of the relative fair value of these assets. Management determines the as-if-vacant fair value of a property using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers. Factors considered by management in performing these analyses include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions and other related costs. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses during the expected lease-up periods based on current market conditions.

The fair values of above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) an estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease including any fixed rate bargain renewal periods, with respect to a below-market lease. The above-market and below-market lease values are capitalized as intangible lease assets or liabilities. Above-market lease values are amortized as an adjustment of rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Below-market leases are amortized as an adjustment of rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, including any fixed rate bargain renewal periods. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration,

45

---

Table of Contents

all unamortized amounts of above-market and below-market in-place lease values related to that lease would be recorded as an adjustment to rental revenue.

The fair values of in-place leases include an estimate of direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant and opportunity costs associated with lost rentals that are avoided by acquiring an in-place lease. Direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant include commissions, tenant improvements, and other direct costs and are estimated based on management’s consideration of current market costs to execute a similar lease. The value of opportunity costs is calculated using the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases over a market absorption period for a similar lease. The in-place lease intangibles are amortized to depreciation and amortization expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts of in-place lease assets relating to that lease would be expensed.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of our real estate and related intangible assets may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the carrying value of real estate and related intangible assets may not be recoverable, we assess the recoverability of the assets by estimating whether we will recover the carrying value of the assets through their undiscounted future cash flows using various assumptions, such as market rate per square foot, annual growth rates, terminal capitalization rates and discount rates. If, based on this analysis, we do not believe that it will be able to recover the carrying value of the assets, we will record an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets.

When developing estimates of expected future cash flows, we make certain assumptions regarding future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease arrangements, property operating expenses, terminal capitalization and discount rates, the expected number of months it takes to re-lease the property, required tenant improvements and the number of years the property will be held for investment. The use of alternative assumptions in the future cash flow analysis could result in a different determination of the property’s future cash flows and a different conclusion regarding the existence of an impairment, the extent of such loss, if any, as well as the carrying value of the real estate and related assets.

In addition, we estimate the fair value of the assets by applying a market approach using comparable sales for certain properties. The use of alternative assumptions in the market approach analysis could result in a different determination of the property’s estimated fair value and a different conclusion regarding the existence of an impairment, the extent of such loss, if any, as well as the carrying value of the real estate and related assets.

Real Estate Acquisitions and Dispositions in 2019

•	During the year ended December 31, 2019, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, acquired 67 properties, inclusive of 60 properties acquired in the REIT Merger on October 4, 2019, for an aggregate purchase price of $1,301,630,000 and comprising approximately 2,874,000 rentable square feet.

•	During the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold one of three buildings and a portion of land related to one healthcare property, which comprised of approximately 9,000 rentable square feet, for a sale price of $3,106,000.

For further discussion of our 2019 acquisitions and dispositions, see Note 3—"Acquisitions and Dispositions" to our consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Factors That May Influence Results of Operations

We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, other than national economic conditions affecting real estate generally and those risks listed in Part I. Item 1A. "Risk Factors," of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, that may reasonably be expected to have a material impact, favorable or unfavorable, on revenues or income from the acquisition, management and operation of our properties. However, due to the recent outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19) in the U.S. and globally, our tenants and their operations, and, thus, their ability to pay rent, may be impacted. The impact of COVID-19 on our future results could be significant and will largely depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information, which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19, the success of actions taken to contain or treat COVID-19 and reactions by consumers, companies, governmental entities and capital markets.

Rental Revenue

The amount of rental revenue generated by our properties depends principally on our ability to maintain the occupancy rates of leased space and to lease available space at the then-existing rental rates. Negative trends in one or more of these factors could adversely affect our rental revenue in future periods. As of December 31, 2019, our properties were 95.1% leased.

46

---

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Our results of operations are influenced by the timing of acquisitions and the operating performance of our operating real estate properties. The following table shows the property statistics of our real estate properties as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

	December 31,
	2019			2018
Number of operating real estate properties (1)	150			85
Leased square feet	8,258,000			5,673,000
Weighted average percentage of rentable square feet leased	95	%		98	%

(1)	As of December 31, 2019, we owned 152 real estate properties, two of which were under construction.

The following table summarizes our real estate activity for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019					2018
Operating real estate properties acquired	65			(1)		15
Operating real estate properties placed into service	—					1
Aggregate purchase price of operating real estate properties acquired	$	1,299,216,000		(1)		$	217,332,000
Aggregate cost of operating real estate properties placed into service	$	—				$	10,372,000
Leased square feet of operating real estate property additions	2,655,000					602,000

(1)	During the year ended December 31, 2019, we acquired 67 real estate properties, two of which were under construction. The properties under construction were purchased for $2,414,000. Additionally, we funded $2,916,000 at the closing date for construction of the development properties.

This section describes and compares our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. We generate almost all of our revenue from property operations. In order to evaluate our overall portfolio, management analyzes the net operating income of same store properties. We define "same store properties" as operating properties that were owned and operated for the entirety of both calendar periods being compared and exclude properties under development. Legacy REIT I property activities represent amounts recorded since the REIT Merger.

By evaluating the revenue and expenses of our same store and Legacy REIT I properties, management is able to monitor the operations of our existing properties for comparable periods to measure the performance of our current portfolio and determine the effects of our new acquisitions on net income.

Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018

Changes in our revenues are summarized in the following table (amounts in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019				2018				$ Change				% Change
Same store rental revenue	$	140,665			$	141,322			$	(657	)		(0.5	)%
Non-same store rental revenue	25,048				11,605				13,443				115.8	%
Legacy REIT I properties rental revenue	20,330				—				20,330				100.0	%
Same store tenant reimbursements	20,326				22,475				(2,149		)		(9.6	)%
Non-same store tenant reimbursements	3,584				1,882				1,702				90.4	%
Legacy REIT I properties tenant reimbursements	761				—				761				100.0	%
Other operating income	187				49				138				281.6	%
Total rental revenue	$	210,901			$	177,333			$	33,568			18.9	%

•	Same store rental revenue decreased primarily due to terminating the leases with two tenants at one of our healthcare properties. The decrease was offset by an increase in same store rental revenue related to entering into certain lease amendments at one of our properties and lease termination fee income recorded during the year ended December 31, 2019.

47

---

Table of Contents

•	Same store tenant reimbursements, which is a non-GAAP metric, decreased primarily due to the adoption of ASU 2018-20, related to real estate taxes, coupled with the write-offs related to tenant reimbursements due to terminating the leases with two tenants at one of our healthcare properties.

•	Non-same store rental revenue and tenant reimbursements increased due to the acquisition of 22 operating properties and placing one development property in service since January 1, 2018.

•	Legacy REIT I properties' rental revenue and tenant reimbursements represent revenue recorded subsequent to the REIT Merger.

Changes in our expenses are summarized in the following table (amounts in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019				2018				$ Change				% Change
Same store rental expenses	$	32,818			$	33,385			$	(567	)		(1.7	)%
Non-same store rental expenses	6,149				3,942				2,207				56.0	%
Legacy REIT I properties rental expenses	2,017				—				2,017				100.0	%
General and administrative expenses	8,421				5,396				3,025				56.1	%
Asset management fees	16,475				13,114				3,361				25.6	%
Depreciation and amortization	74,104				58,258				15,846				27.2	%
Impairment loss on real estate	21,000				—				21,000				100.0	%
Total expenses	$	160,984			$	114,095			$	46,889			41.1	%
Gain on real estate disposition	$	79			$	—			$	79			100.0	%

•

Same store rental expenses, certain of which are subject to reimbursement by our tenants, decreased primarily due to the adoption of ASU 2018-20, related to real estate taxes, and a decrease in utility costs at certain properties, partially offset by the gross-up of ground lease rental payments from one tenant that pays the ground lease obligations directly to the lessor, consistent with the adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019. See Note 2—"Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for further discussion.

•	Non-same store rental expenses, certain of which are subject to reimbursement by our tenants, increased primarily due to the acquisition of 22 operating properties and placing one development property in service since January 1, 2018.

•	Legacy REIT I properties rental expenses represent expenses recorded subsequent to the REIT Merger.

•

General and administrative expenses increased primarily due to an increase in custodial fees related to maintaining and safekeeping services of our stockholders' accounts, an increase in administrative costs of managing and operating our real estate properties in connection with our growth and an increase in transfer agent fees. During the period we were selling shares of common stock pursuant to our Offerings, costs related to our custodial fees and transfer agent were recorded in the consolidated statements of stockholders' equity as other offering costs.

•	Asset management fees increased due to an increase in our real estate properties since January 1, 2018.

•	Depreciation and amortization increased due to an increase in the weighted average depreciable basis of operating real estate properties since January 1, 2018, coupled with the acceleration of amortization recorded in the amount of $3.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, related to two in-place lease intangible assets.

•	Impairment loss on real estate increased due to impairment recorded in the amount of $21.0 million related to two healthcare properties.

48

---

Table of Contents

Changes in interest and other expense, net, are summarized in the following table (amounts in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019				2018				$ Change				% Change
Interest and other expense, net:
Interest on notes payable	$	21,025			$	21,036			$	(11	)		(0.1	)%
Interest on credit facility	24,072				12,376				11,696				94.5	%
Amortization of deferred financing costs	2,825				2,810				15				0.5	%
Cash deposits interest	(566		)		(678		)		112				(16.5	)%
Capitalized interest	(142		)		(1,179		)		1,037				(88.0	)%
Total interest and other expense, net	$	47,214			$	34,365			$	12,849			37.4	%

•	Interest on credit facility increased due to an increase in the weighted average outstanding principal balance on our credit facility, an increase in interest rates and write-offs of the deferred financing costs related to the termination of the Bridge Facility (as defined in “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Credit Facility.”)

•	Capitalized interest decreased due to a decrease in the average accumulated expenditures on development properties due to placing one development property in service since January 1, 2018.

Share Repurchase Program

Our share repurchase program allows for repurchases of shares of our common stock when certain criteria are met. The share repurchase program provides that all repurchases during any calendar year, including those redeemable upon death or a Qualifying Disability of a stockholder, are limited to those that can be funded with equivalent proceeds raised from the distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP Offerings, during the prior calendar year and other operating funds, if any, as the board of directors, in its sole discretion, may reserve for this purpose.

Repurchases of shares of our common stock are at the sole discretion of our board of directors, provided, however, that we will limit the number of shares repurchased during any calendar year to 5.0% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31^st of the previous calendar year. In addition, our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may suspend (in whole or in part) the share repurchase program at any time, and may amend, reduce, terminate or otherwise change the share repurchase program upon 30 days' prior notice to our stockholders for any reason it deems appropriate.

In connection with entering into the Merger Agreement, on April 10, 2019, our board of directors approved the Sixth Amended & Restated SRP, which became effective on May 11, 2019, and was applied beginning with repurchases made on the 2019 third quarter Repurchase Date. Under the Sixth Amended & Restated SRP, we only repurchased shares of common stock (Class A shares, Class I shares, Class T Shares and Class T2 shares) in connection with the death, qualifying disability, or involuntary exigent circumstance (as determined by our board of directors in its sole discretion) of a stockholder, subject to certain terms and conditions specified in the Sixth Amended & Restated SRP.

On October 2, 2019, in connection with the REIT Merger, our board of directors approved the Amended SRP. The Amended SRP applied to all eligible stockholders, beginning with repurchases made on the first quarter repurchase date of 2020, which was January 30, 2020. See Part II, Item 5. "Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities" for more information on the Amended SRP.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we repurchased 2,557,298 Class A shares, Class I shares, Class T shares and Class T2 shares of common stock (1,910,894 Class A shares, 189,947 Class I shares, 451,058 Class T shares and 5,399 Class T2 shares) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $23,655,000 (an average of $9.25 per share). During the year ended December 31, 2018, we repurchased 4,700,554 Class A shares, Class I shares and Class T shares of common stock (4,117,566 Class A shares, 71,180 Class I shares and 511,808 Class T shares) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $43,230,000 (an average of $9.20 per share).

Inflation

We are exposed to inflation risk as income from long-term leases is the primary source of our cash flows from operations. There are provisions in certain of our leases with tenants that are intended to protect us from, and mitigate the risk of, the impact of inflation. These provisions include scheduled increases in contractual base rent receipts, reimbursement billings for operating expenses, pass-through charges and real estate tax and insurance reimbursements. However, due to the long-term nature of our leases, among other factors, the leases may not reset frequently enough to adequately offset the effects of inflation.

49

---

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal demands for funds are for acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related investments, capital expenditures, operating expenses, distributions to and repurchases from stockholders and principal and interest on any current and future indebtedness. Generally, cash for these items is generated from operations of our current and future investments. Our sources of funds are primarily operating cash flows, funds equal to amounts reinvested in the DRIP, our credit facility and other borrowings.

When we acquire a property, our Advisor prepares a capital plan that contemplates the estimated capital needs of that investment. In addition to operating expenses, capital needs may also include costs of refurbishment, tenant improvements or other major capital expenditures. The capital plan also sets forth the anticipated sources of the necessary capital, which may include a line of credit or other loans established with respect to the investment, operating cash generated by the investment, additional equity investments from us or joint venture partners or, when necessary, capital reserves. In some cases, a lender may require us to establish capital reserves for a particular investment. The capital plan for each investment will be adjusted through ongoing, regular reviews of our portfolio or, as necessary, to respond to unanticipated additional capital needs.

Short-term Liquidity and Capital Resources

On a short-term basis, our principal demands for funds will be for the acquisition of real estate and real estate-related notes and investments and funding of tenant improvements, acquisition related costs, operating expenses, distributions to and repurchases from stockholders, and interest and principal payments on current and future debt financings. We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through net cash flows provided by operations, funds equal to amounts reinvested in the DRIP, borrowings on our credit facility, as well as secured and unsecured borrowings from banks and other lenders.

Long-term Liquidity and Capital Resources

On a long-term basis, our principal demands for funds will be for the acquisition of real estate and real estate-related notes and investments and funding of tenant improvements, acquisition related costs, operating expenses, distributions to and repurchases from stockholders, and interest and principal payments on current and future indebtedness. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through proceeds from cash flow from operations, borrowings on our credit facility, proceeds from secured or unsecured borrowings from banks or other lenders and funds equal to amounts reinvested in the DRIP.

We expect that substantially all cash flows from operations will be used to pay distributions to our stockholders after certain capital expenditures; however, we have used, and may continue to use, other sources to fund distributions, as necessary, such as, funds equal to amounts reinvested in the DRIP, borrowings on our credit facility and/or future borrowings on unencumbered assets. To the extent cash flows from operations are lower due to fewer properties being acquired or lower-than-expected returns on the properties held, distributions paid to stockholders may be lower. We expect that substantially all net cash flows from our operations or debt financings will be used to fund acquisitions, certain capital expenditures identified at acquisition, repayments of outstanding debt or distributions to our stockholders.

In addition, we are continuing to monitor the outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19) and its impact on our tenants and the healthcare industry as a whole. The magnitude and duration of the pandemic and its impact on our operations and liquidity is uncertain as of the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K as this continues to evolve globally. However, if the outbreak continues on its current trajectory, such impacts could grow and become material. To the extent that our tenants continue to be impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak or by the other risks disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, this could materially disrupt our business operations.

Capital Expenditures

We will require approximately $39.0 million in expenditures for capital improvements over the next 12 months, of which $27.6 million relates to two development projects we anticipate to complete in 2020. We cannot provide assurances, however, that actual expenditures will not exceed these estimated expenditure levels. As of December 31, 2019, we had $4.7 million of restricted cash in escrow reserve accounts for such capital expenditures. In addition, as of December 31, 2019, we had approximately $69.3 million in cash and cash equivalents. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we paid capital expenditures of $12.8 million that primarily related to two data center properties and three healthcare properties.

Credit Facility

As of December 31, 2019, the maximum commitments available under the KeyBank Credit Facility were $780,000,000, consisting of a $500,000,000 revolving line of credit, with a maturity date of April 27, 2022, subject to our right for one, 12-month extension period and a $280,000,000 term loan, with a maturity date of April 27, 2023. Subject to certain conditions, the KeyBank Credit Facility can be increased to $1,000,000,000 any time before April 27, 2021.

On April 11, 2019, in connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, our Operating Partnership entered into a commitment letter to obtain a senior secured bridge facility, or the Bridge Facility, in an amount of $475,000,000. Upon the

50

---

Table of Contents

closing of the Term Loan (defined below), on August 7, 2019, we terminated the Bridge Facility.

On August 7, 2019, we and certain of our subsidiaries entered into the Term Loan, with KeyBank National Association, a national banking association, or KeyBank, as Administrative Agent for the lenders, for the maximum commitment available of up to $520,000,000 with a maturity date of December 31, 2024. Subject to certain conditions, the Term Loan can be increased to $600,000,000 any time before December 31, 2023. The Term Loan was funded upon the consummation of the REIT Merger on October 4, 2019.

The maximum commitments available under the KeyBank Credit Facility and the Term Loan, collectively, can be increased to $1,600,000,000. Generally, the proceeds of loans made under our credit facility may be used to finance the acquisition of real estate investments, for tenant improvements and leasing commissions with respect to real estate, for repayment of indebtedness, for capital expenditures with respect to real estate and for general corporate and working capital purposes.

See Note 10—"Credit Facility" to the consolidated financial statements that are part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The annual interest rate payable under our credit facility is, at our option, either: (a) the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.75% to 2.25%, which is determined based on our overall leverage, or (b) a base rate which means, for any day, a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the prime rate for such day plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.75% to 1.25%, which is determined based on our overall leverage. As of December 31, 2019, the interest rate on the variable rate portion of our credit facility was 3.9% and the weighted average interest rate on the variable rate fixed through interest rate swap portion of our credit facility was 4.2%.

In addition to interest, we are required to pay a fee on the unused portion of the lenders’ commitments under our credit facility at a per annum rate equal to 0.25% if the daily amount outstanding under our credit facility is less than 50% of the lenders’ commitments, or 0.15% if the daily amount outstanding under our credit facility is greater than or equal to 50% of the lenders’ commitments. The unused fee is payable quarterly in arrears.

The actual amount of credit available under our credit facility is a function of certain loan-to-cost, loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios contained in our credit facility agreements. The amount of credit available under our credit facility will be a maximum principal amount of the value of the assets that are included in the pool availability.

Our credit facility agreements contain various affirmative and negative covenants that are customary for credit facilities and transactions of this type, including limitations on the incurrence of debt by us, our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries that own properties that serve as collateral for our credit facility, limitations on the nature of our business, our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, and limitations on distributions by us, our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. Our credit facility agreements impose the following financial covenants, which are specifically defined in our credit facility agreements, on us: (a) maximum ratio of indebtedness to gross asset value; (b) minimum ratio of adjusted consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization to consolidated fixed charges; (c) minimum tangible net worth; (d) minimum liquidity thresholds; (e) minimum weighted average remaining lease term of properties in the collateral pool; and (f) minimum number of properties in the collateral pool. In addition, our credit facility agreements include events of default that are customary for credit facilities and transactions of this type. We were in compliance with all financial covenant requirements at December 31, 2019.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we added 64 healthcare properties and one data center property to the unencumbered pool of our credit facility, which increased our total pool availability under our credit facility by approximately $603,675,000.

As of December 31, 2019, we had a total pool availability under our credit facility of $1,129,545,000 and an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $908,000,000; therefore, $221,545,000 was available to be drawn under our credit facility.

Notes Payable

For a discussion of our notes payable, see Note 9—"Notes Payable" to the consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Financing

We anticipate that our aggregate borrowings, both secured and unsecured, will not exceed the greater of 50.0% of the combined cost or fair market value of our real estate-related investments. For these purposes, the fair market value of each asset is equal to the purchase price paid for the asset or, if the asset was appraised subsequent to the date of purchase, then the fair market value will be equal to the value reported in the most recent independent appraisal of the asset. Our policies do not limit the amount we may borrow with respect to any individual investment. As of December 31, 2019, our borrowings were 42.1% of the fair market value of our real estate-related investments.

51

---

Table of Contents

Under our charter, we have a limitation on borrowing that precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300.0% of our net assets, without the approval of a majority of our independent directors. Net assets for purposes of this calculation are defined to be our total assets (other than intangibles) valued at cost prior to deducting depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. Generally, the preceding calculation is expected to approximate 75.0% of the aggregate cost of our real estate and real estate-related investments before depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves. In addition, we may incur mortgage debt and pledge some or all of our properties as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire additional real properties or for working capital. We may also borrow funds to satisfy the REIT tax qualification requirement that we distribute at least 90.0% of our annual REIT taxable income to our stockholders. Furthermore, we may borrow if we otherwise deem it necessary or advisable to ensure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. As of December 31, 2019, our leverage did not exceed 300.0% of the value of our net assets.

In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority, or FCA, that regulates LIBOR announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York organized the Alternative Reference Rates Committee which identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or the SOFR, as its preferred alternative to USD-LIBOR in derivatives and other financial contracts. We are not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be available or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR markets. Any changes adopted by FCA or other governing bodies in the method used for determining LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR. If that were to occur, our interest payments could change. In addition, uncertainty about the extent and manner of future changes may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher or lower than if LIBOR were to remain available in its current form.

While we expect LIBOR to be available in substantially its current form until the end of 2021, it is possible that LIBOR will become unavailable prior to that point. This could result, for example, if sufficient banks decline to make submissions to the LIBOR administrator. In that case, the risks associated with the transition to an alternative reference rate will be accelerated and magnified.

Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018

	Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2019				2018				Change				% Change
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	80,109			$	74,211			$	5,898			7.9	%
Net cash used in investing activities	$	538,318			$	232,815			$	305,503			131.2	%
Net cash provided by financing activities	$	458,912			$	152,384			$	306,528			201.2	%

Operating Activities

•

Net cash provided by operating activities increased primarily due to an increase in rental revenues resulting from the acquisition of 83 operating properties, inclusive of 60 properties acquired in the REIT Merger, and placing one development property in service since January 1, 2018, offset by rent not being collected from two tenants, the leases with which were terminated during 2019, coupled with the interest expense paid related to the revolving portion of our credit facility and deferred financing costs paid related to the Bridge Facility, which was terminated on August 7, 2019.

Investing Activities

•	Net cash used in investing activities increased primarily due to the REIT Merger, offset by a real estate disposition and a decrease in capital projects during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Financing Activities

•

Net cash provided by financing activities increased primarily due to an increase in proceeds from our credit facility that were used for the REIT Merger, coupled with a decrease in repurchases of common stock due to entering into the Sixth Amended & Restated SRP (as defined and discussed in Part II, Item 5. "Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities" for more information on the Amended SRP), offset by a decrease in proceeds from issuance of common stock as a result of the termination of our offering and an increase in payments on notes payable, primarily due to a partial pre-payment of one of our notes payable (as discussed in Note 9—"Notes Payable").

52

---

Table of Contents

Distributions to Stockholders

We have paid, and may continue to pay, distributions from sources other than from our cash flows from operations. For the year ended December 31, 2019, our cash flows provided by operations of approximately $80.1 million was a shortfall of approximately $9.3 million, or 10.4%, of our distributions paid (total distributions were approximately $89.4 million, of which $49.5 million was cash and $39.9 million was reinvested in shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP) during such period and such shortfall was paid from proceeds from our DRIP Offering. For the year ended December 31, 2018, our cash flows provided by operations of approximately $74.2 million was a shortfall of approximately $7.0 million, or 8.6% of our distributions paid (total distributions were approximately $81.2 million, of which $40.3 million was cash and $40.9 million was reinvested in shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP) during such period and such shortfall was paid from proceeds from our DRIP Offering. Our inability to acquire additional properties or other real estate-related investments may result in a lower return on investment than a stockholder may expect.

We do not have any limits on the sources of funding distribution payments to our stockholders. We may pay distributions from any source, such as from borrowings, the sale of assets, the sale of additional securities, advances from our advisor, our advisor’s deferral, suspension and/or waiver of its fees and expense reimbursements and offering proceeds and have no limits on the amounts we may pay from such sources. Funding distributions from borrowings could restrict the amount we can borrow for investments, which may affect our profitability. Funding distributions with the sale of assets may affect our ability to generate cash flows. Funding distributions from the sale of additional securities could dilute a stockholder's interest in us if we sell shares of our common stock to third party investors. Funding distributions from the proceeds of our Offerings will result in us having less funds available for acquiring properties or real estate-related investments. Our inability to acquire additional properties or real estate-related investments may have a negative effect on our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to pay distributions. As a result, the return investors may realize on their investment may be reduced and investors who invest in us before we generate significant cash flow may realize a lower rate of return than later investors. Payment of distributions from any of the mentioned sources could restrict our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations, affect our profitability and/or affect the distributions payable upon a liquidity event, any or all of which may have an adverse effect on an investment in us.

For federal income tax purposes, distributions to common stockholders are characterized as ordinary dividends, capital gain distributions, or nontaxable distributions. To the extent that we make a distribution in excess of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be a nontaxable return of capital, reducing the tax basis in each U.S. stockholder’s shares. Further, the amount of distributions in excess of a U.S. stockholder’s tax basis in such shares will be taxable as a gain realized from the sale of those shares.

53

---

Table of Contents

The following table shows the character of distributions we paid on a percentage basis during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

		Year Ended December 31,
Character of Class A Distributions:		2019			2018
Ordinary dividends		17.93	%		41.38	%
Capital gain distributions		0.38	%		—	%
Nontaxable distributions		81.69	%		58.62	%
Total		100.00	%		100.00	%
		Year Ended December 31,
Character of Class I Distributions:		2019			2018
Ordinary dividends		17.93	%		41.38	%
Capital gain distributions		0.38	%		—	%
Nontaxable distributions		81.69	%		58.62	%
Total		100.00	%		100.00	%
		Year Ended December 31,
Character of Class T Distributions:		2019			2018
Ordinary dividends		4.79	%		33.01	%
Capital gain distributions		0.43	%		—	%
Nontaxable distributions		94.78	%		66.99	%
Total		100.00	%		100.00	%
		Year Ended December 31,
Character of Class T2 Distributions:		2019			2018
Ordinary dividends		4.79	%		33.01	%
Capital gain distributions		0.43	%		—	%
Nontaxable distributions		94.78	%		66.99	%
Total		100.00	%		100.00	%

The amount of distributions payable to our stockholders is determined by our board of directors and is dependent on a number of factors, including our funds available for distribution, financial condition, lenders' restrictions and limitations, capital expenditure requirements and the annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Our board of directors must authorize each distribution and may, in the future, authorize lower amounts of distributions or not authorize additional distributions and, therefore, distribution payments are not guaranteed. We have funded distributions with operating cash flows from our properties and funds equal to amounts reinvested in the DRIP. To the extent that we do not have taxable income, distributions paid will be considered a return of capital to stockholders. The following table shows the sources of distributions paid during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019							2018
Distributions paid in cash - common stockholders	$	49,494						$	40,296
Distributions reinvested (shares issued)	39,934							40,938
Total distributions	$	89,428						$	81,234
Source of distributions:
Cash flows provided by operations (1)	$	49,494			55	%		$	40,296			50	%
Offering proceeds from issuance of common stock pursuant to the DRIP (1)	39,934				45	%		40,938				50	%
Total sources	$	89,428			100	%		$	81,234			100	%

(1)	Percentages were calculated by dividing the respective source amount by the total sources of distributions.

54

---

Table of Contents

Total distributions declared but not paid on Class A shares, Class I shares, Class T shares and Class T2 shares as of December 31, 2019, were approximately $9.1 million for common stockholders. These distributions were paid on January 2, 2020.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, we declared and paid distributions of approximately $89.4 million to Class A stockholders, Class I stockholders, Class T stockholders and Class T2 stockholders, including shares issued pursuant to the DRIP, as compared to FFO (as defined below) for the year ended December 31, 2019 of approximately $97.8 million.

The payment of distributions from sources other than FFO may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds.

For a discussion of distributions paid subsequent to December 31, 2019, see Note 21—"Subsequent Events" to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Commitments and Contingencies

For a discussion of our commitments and contingencies, see Note 18—"Commitments and Contingencies" to the consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Debt Service Requirements

One of our principal liquidity needs is the payment of principal and interest on outstanding indebtedness. As of December 31, 2019, we had $457.3 million in notes payable principal outstanding and $908.0 million of principal outstanding under our credit facility. We are required by the terms of certain loan documents to meet certain covenants, such as financial ratios and reporting requirements. As of December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with all such covenants and requirements on our notes payable and our credit facility.

As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate notional amount under our derivative instruments was $637.8 million, inclusive of three interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $150.0 million and an effective date of January 1, 2020. We have agreements with each derivative counterparty that contain cross-default provisions, whereby if we default on our indebtedness, then we could also be declared in default on our derivative obligations, resulting in an acceleration of payment thereunder. As of December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with all such cross-default provisions.

Contractual Obligations

As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately $1,365.3 million of principal debt outstanding, of which $457.3 million related to notes payable and $908.0 million related to our credit facility. See Note 9—"Notes Payable" and Note 10—"Credit Facility" to the consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for certain terms of the debt outstanding.

Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019, were as follows (amounts in thousands):

	Less than 1 Year				1-3 Years				3-5 Years				More than 5 Years				Total
Principal payments—fixed rate debt	$	1,152			$	77,229			$	30,070			$	111,116			$	219,567
Interest payments—fixed rate debt	9,509				15,587				11,130				11,341				47,567
Principal payments—variable rate debt fixed through interest rate swap agreements	2,773				235,005				250,000				—				487,778
Interest payments—variable rate debt fixed through interest rate swap agreements (1)	21,862				36,194				3,510				—				61,566
Principal payments—variable rate debt	—				108,000				550,000				—				658,000
Interest payments—variable rate debt (2)	25,933				49,028				41,382				—				116,343
Capital expenditures	38,954				6,265				3,446				4,339				53,004
Ground lease payments	1,633				3,268				3,325				136,719				144,945
Total	$	101,816			$	530,576			$	892,863			$	263,515			$	1,788,770

(1)	We used the fixed rates under our interest rate swap agreements as of December 31, 2019, to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.

(2)	We used LIBOR plus the applicable margin under our variable rate debt agreements as of December 31, 2019, to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.

55

---

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2019, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements

We have entered into agreements with our Advisor and its affiliates whereby we agree to pay certain fees to, or reimburse certain expenses of, our Advisor or its affiliates for acquisition and disposition fees and expenses, organization and offering expenses, asset and property management fees and reimbursement of operating costs. Refer to Note 11—"Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements" to our consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a detailed discussion of the various related-party transactions and agreements.

Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations

One of our objectives is to provide cash distributions to our stockholders from cash generated by our operations. The purchase of real estate assets and real estate-related investments, and the corresponding expenses associated with that process, is a key operational feature of our business plan in order to generate cash from operations. Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as funds from operations, or FFO, which we believe is an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to our net income as determined under GAAP.

We define FFO, consistent with NAREIT’s definition, as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property and asset impairment write-downs, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis.

We, along with others in the real estate industry, consider FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of a REIT’s operating performance because it is based on a net income analysis of property portfolio performance that excludes non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization and asset impairment write-downs, which we believe provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to our management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy.

Historical accounting convention (in accordance with GAAP) for real estate assets requires companies to report their investment in real estate at its carrying value, which consists of capitalizing the cost of acquisitions, development, construction, improvements and significant replacements, less depreciation and amortization and asset impairment write-downs, if any, which is not necessarily equivalent to the fair market value of their investment in real estate assets.

The historical accounting convention requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, which could be the case if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or as requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value disclosed. We believe that, since the fair value of real estate assets historically rises and falls with market conditions including, but not limited to, inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation could be less informative.

In addition, we believe it is appropriate to disregard asset impairment write-downs as they are non-cash adjustments to recognize losses on prospective sales of real estate assets. Since losses from sales of real estate assets are excluded from FFO, we believe it is appropriate that asset impairment write-downs in advance of realization of losses should be excluded. Impairment write-downs are based on negative market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, which are independent of our operating performance, including, but not limited to, a significant adverse change in the financial condition of our tenants, changes in supply and demand for similar or competing properties, changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning law, which can change over time. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the carrying value of real estate and related assets may not be recoverable, we assess the recoverability by estimating whether we will recover the carrying value of the asset through undiscounted future cash flows and eventual disposition (including, but not limited to, net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of property and any other ancillary cash flows at a property or group level under GAAP). If based on this analysis, we do not believe that we will be able to recover the carrying value of the real estate asset, we will record an impairment write-down to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the real estate asset. Testing for indicators of impairment is a continuous process and is analyzed on a quarterly basis or when indicators of impairment exist. Investors should note, however, that determinations of whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property, including estimated future net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other

56

---

Table of Contents

ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO as described above, investors are cautioned that due to the fact that identifying impairments is based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows and that we intend to have a relatively limited term of our operations, it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges through the eventual sale of the property.

In developing estimates of expected future cash flows, we make certain assumptions regarding future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease arrangements, property operating expenses, terminal capitalization and discount rates, the expected number of months it takes to re-lease the property, required tenant improvements and the number of years the property will be held for investment. The use of alternative assumptions in the future cash flow analysis could result in a different determination of the property’s future cash flows and a different conclusion regarding the existence of an asset impairment, the extent of such loss, if any, as well as the carrying value of the real estate asset.

Publicly registered, non-listed REITs, such as us, typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operations. While other start up entities may also experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, we believe that publicly registered, non-listed REITs, like us, are unique in that they have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after the acquisition activity ceases. We will use the cash flows from operations and debt financings to acquire real estate assets and real estate-related investments, and our board of directors will determine to pursue a liquidity event when it believes that the then-current market conditions are favorable; however, our board of directors does not anticipate evaluating a liquidity event (i.e., listing of our shares of common stock on a national securities exchange, a sale, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or another similar transaction) until five to seven years after the termination of our primary offering of our initial public offering, which is generally comparable to other publicly registered, non-listed REITs. Thus, we do not intend to continuously purchase real estate assets and intend to have a limited life. Due to these factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives, or the IPA, an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as modified funds from operations, or MFFO, which we believe to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a publicly registered, non-listed REIT. MFFO is a metric used by management to evaluate sustainable performance and dividend policy. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income as determined under GAAP.

We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the IPA’s definition in its Practice Guideline: FFO further adjusted for the following items included in the determination of GAAP net income; acquisition fees and expenses; amounts related to straight-line rental income and amortization of above and below intangible lease assets and liabilities; accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; nonrecurring gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, adjustments related to contingent purchase price obligations where such adjustments have been included in the derivation of GAAP net income, and after adjustments for a consolidated and unconsolidated partnership and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. Our MFFO calculation complies with the IPA’s Practice Guideline, described above. In calculating MFFO, we exclude amortization of above and below-market leases, along with the net of right-of-use assets - operating leases and operating lease liabilities, resulting from above- and below- market ground leases, and amounts related to straight-line rents (which are adjusted in order to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to closer to an expected to be received cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payment) and ineffectiveness of interest rate swaps. The other adjustments included in the IPA’s Practice Guidelines are not applicable to us.

Since MFFO excludes acquisition fees and expenses, it should not be construed as a historic performance measure. Acquisition fees and expenses are paid in cash by us, and we have not set aside or put into escrow any specific amount of proceeds from our offerings to be used to fund acquisition fees and expenses. Acquisition fees and expenses include payments to our Advisor or its affiliates and third parties. Such fees and expenses will not be reimbursed by our Advisor or its affiliates and third parties, and therefore if there are no proceeds remaining from the sale of shares of our common stock to fund future acquisition fees and expenses, such fees and expenses will need to be paid from either additional debt, operational earnings or cash flows, net proceeds from the sale of properties, or from ancillary cash flows. As a result, the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations would be reduced, or we may incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds. Nevertheless, our Advisor or its affiliates will not accrue any claim on our assets if acquisition fees and expenses are not paid from the proceeds of our offerings. Under GAAP, acquisition fees and expenses related to the acquisition of properties determined to be business combinations are expensed as incurred, including investment transactions that are no longer under consideration, and, when incurred, are included in acquisition related expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income and acquisition fees and expenses associated with transactions determined to be an asset acquisition are capitalized.

57

---

Table of Contents

All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the real estate asset, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. In addition, MFFO may not be an indicator of our operating performance, especially during periods in which properties are being acquired.

In addition, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income in determining cash flows from operations in accordance with GAAP.

We use MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other publicly registered, non-listed REITs, which intend to have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that our use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it allow us to present our performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to publicly registered, non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence the use of such measures may be useful to investors. For example, acquisition fees and expenses are intended to be funded from financing sources and not from operations. By excluding acquisition fees and expenses, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with management’s analysis of the operating performance of its real estate assets. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to our current operating performance. By excluding such charges that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information.

Presentation of this information is intended to assist management and investors in comparing the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance, as an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with other measurements as an indication of our performance. MFFO has limitations as a performance measure. However, MFFO may be useful in assisting management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete and net asset value is disclosed. MFFO is not a useful measure in evaluating net asset value since impairment write-downs are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining MFFO.

FFO and MFFO, as described above, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating our operational performance. The method used to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operating performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO. MFFO has not been scrutinized to the level of other similar non-GAAP performance measures by the SEC or any other regulatory body.

58

---

Table of Contents

The following is a reconciliation of net income attributable to common stockholders, which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to FFO and MFFO for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands, except share data and per share amounts):

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2019				2018
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	2,782			$	28,873
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization (1)	74,104				58,258
Gain on real estate disposition	(79		)		—
Impairment loss on real estate	21,000				—
FFO attributable to common stockholders	$	97,807			$	87,131
Adjustments:
Amortization of intangible assets and liabilities (2)	(4,248		)		(4,280		)
Reduction in the carrying amount of right-of-use assets - operating leases, net	577				—
Straight-line rent (3)	(14,207		)		(13,364		)
Ineffectiveness of interest rate swaps	—				98
MFFO attributable to common stockholders	$	79,929			$	69,585
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic	157,247,345				131,040,645
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted	157,271,668				131,064,388
Net income per common share - basic	$	0.02			$	0.22
Net income per common share - diluted	$	0.02			$	0.22
FFO per common share - basic	$	0.62			$	0.66
FFO per common share - diluted	$	0.62			$	0.66

(1)	During the year ended December 31, 2019, we wrote off two in-place lease intangible assets in the amount of approximately $3.2 million by accelerating the amortization of the acquired intangible assets.

(2)

Under GAAP, certain intangibles are accounted for at cost and reviewed for impairment. However, because real estate values and market lease rates historically rise or fall with market conditions, management believes that by excluding charges related to amortization of these intangibles, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the performance of the real estate. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we wrote off one below-market lease intangible liability in the amount of approximately $0.2 million by accelerating the amortization of the acquired intangible liability.

(3)

Under GAAP, rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related lease (including rent holidays if applicable). This may result in income recognition that is significantly different than the underlying contract terms. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we wrote off approximately $0.5 million of straight-line rent. By adjusting for the change in straight-line rent receivable, MFFO may provide useful supplemental information on the realized economic impact of lease terms, providing insight on the expected contractual cash flows of such lease terms, and aligns with our analysis of operating performance.

59

---

Table of Contents

The following is a reconciliation of net income attributable to common stockholders, which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to FFO and MFFO for the following quarterly periods (amounts in thousands, except share data and per share amounts):

	Quarter Ended
	December 31, 2019				September 30, 2019				June 30, 2019				March 31, 2019
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	1,787			$	(9,630	)		$	6,264			$	4,361
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization	23,994				16,254				15,610				18,246
Gain on real estate disposition	(79		)		—				—				—
Impairment loss on real estate	8,000				13,000				—				—
FFO attributable to common stockholders	$	33,702			$	19,624			$	21,874			$	22,607
Adjustments:
Amortization of intangible assets and liabilities (1)	(810		)		(1,285		)		(1,077		)		(1,076		)
Reduction in the carrying amount of right-of-use assets - operating leases, net	212				141				111				113
Straight-line rent (2)	(5,767		)		(2,784		)		(2,982		)		(2,674		)
MFFO attributable to common stockholders	$	27,337			$	15,696			$	17,926			$	18,970
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic	218,928,165				137,063,509				136,135,710				136,179,343
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted	218,955,915				137,063,509				136,161,037				136,204,843
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted for FFO	218,955,915				137,082,259				136,161,037				136,204,843
Net income (loss) per common share - basic	$	0.01			$	(0.07	)		$	0.05			$	0.03
Net income (loss) per common share - diluted	$	0.01			$	(0.07	)		$	0.05			$	0.03
FFO per common share - basic	$	0.15			$	0.14			$	0.16			$	0.17
FFO per common share - diluted	$	0.15			$	0.14			$	0.16			$	0.17

(1)	Under GAAP, certain intangibles are accounted for at cost and reviewed for impairment. However, because real estate values and market lease rates historically rise or fall with market conditions, management believes that by excluding charges related to amortization of these intangibles, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the performance of the real estate.

(2)	Under GAAP, rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related lease (including rent holidays if applicable). This may result in income recognition that is significantly different than the underlying contract terms.

Subsequent Events

For a discussion of subsequent events, see Note 21—"Subsequent Events" to the consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to Note 2—“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further explanation.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business plan, the primary market risk to which we are exposed is interest rate risk.

We have obtained variable rate debt financing to fund certain property acquisitions, and we are exposed to changes in the one-month LIBOR. Our objectives in managing interest rate risk seek to limit the impact of interest rate changes on operations and cash flows, and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we will borrow primarily at interest rates with the lowest margins available and, in some cases, with the ability to convert variable interest rates to fixed rates.

We have entered, and may continue to enter, into derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swaps, in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a given variable rate financial instrument. To the extent we do, we are exposed to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. When the fair value of a

60

---

Table of Contents

derivative contract is negative, we owe the counterparty and, therefore, it does not possess credit risk. Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. We manage the market risk associated with interest rate contracts by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken. We have not entered, and do not intend to enter, into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes. We may also enter into rate-lock arrangements to lock interest rates on future borrowings.

In addition to changes in interest rates, the value of our future investments will be subject to fluctuations based on changes in local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of tenants, which may affect our ability to refinance our debt, if necessary.

The following table summarizes our principal debt outstanding as of December 31, 2019 (amounts in thousands):

	December 31, 2019
Notes payable:
Fixed rate notes payable	$	219,567
Variable rate notes payable fixed through interest rate swaps	237,778
Total notes payable	457,345
Credit facility:
Variable rate revolving line of credit	108,000
Variable rate term loan fixed through interest rate swaps	250,000
Variable rate term loans	550,000
Total credit facility	908,000
Total principal debt outstanding (1)	$	1,365,345

(1)	As of December 31, 2019, the weighted average interest rate on our total debt outstanding was 4.2%.

As of December 31, 2019, $658.0 million of the $1,365.3 million total principal debt outstanding was subject to variable interest rates with a weighted average interest rate of 3.9% per annum. As of December 31, 2019, an increase of 50 basis points in the market rates of interest would have resulted in an increase in interest expense of approximately $3.3 million per year.

As of December 31, 2019, we had 18 interest rate swap agreements outstanding, which mature on various dates from December 2020 to December 2024, with an aggregate notional amount under the swap agreements of $637.8 million, inclusive of three interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $150.0 million and an effective date of January 1, 2020. As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate settlement value was $(5.1) million. The settlement value of these interest rate swap agreements is dependent upon existing market interest rates and swap spreads. As of December 31, 2019, an increase of 50 basis points in the market rates of interest would have resulted in an increase to the settlement value of these interest rate swaps to $3.7 million. These interest rate swaps were designated as hedging instruments.

We do not have any foreign operations and thus we are not exposed to foreign currency fluctuations.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

See the index at Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to us, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and we necessarily were required to apply our judgment in evaluating whether the benefits of the controls and procedures that we adopt outweigh their costs.

61

---

Table of Contents

As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, we conducted an evaluation as of December 31, 2019 under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of December 31, 2019, were effective at a reasonable assurance level.

(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected. Under the supervision, and with the participation, of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or the Original Framework. Based on our evaluation under the Original Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the permanent deferral adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission that permits the us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

(c) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2019, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

62

---

Table of Contents

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

63

---

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Board of Directors and Executive Officers

Our directors and executive officers and their respective positions are as follows:

Name		Age		Positions
John E. Carter		60		Chairman of the Board
Michael A. Seton		47		Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Kay C. Neely		43		Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Randall Greene		70		Director (Independent)
Jonathan Kuchin		68		Director (Independent)
Ronald Rayevich		77		Director (Independent)
Roger Pratt		67		Director (Independent)
Robert M. Winslow		70		Director

John E. Carter has served as the Chairman of our board of directors since January 2013. Mr. Carter served as our Chief Executive Officer from January 2013 to April 2018. Mr. Carter founded and served as the Chairman of the board of directors of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. from December 2009 to October 2019 and Chief Executive Officer of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. from December 2009 to April 2018. Mr. Carter also served as our President from January 2013 to March 2015 and served as President of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. from December 2009 to March 2015. He also serves as Executive Chairman of Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC. He has served as Chief Executive Officer from January 2013 to July 2015 and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC from August 2015 to April 2018, and is a member of the Investment Committee of Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and Chief Executive Officer of Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC since January 2013. Mr. Carter serves as Executive Chairman of our sponsor, Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC. He has served as Chief Executive Officer from January 2013 to July 2015 and as Co-Chief Executive Officer of Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC, from July 2015 to April 2018. Mr. Carter founded and served as Executive Chairman of Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC until October 2019 and has served as Chief Executive Officer from December 2009 to August 2015 and Co-Chief Executive Officer from August 2015 to April 2018, a member of the Investment Management Committee of Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC and Chief Executive Officer of Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services, LLC from December 2009 to October 2019. Mr. Carter founded and served as Executive Chairman of Carter/Validus REIT Investment Management Company, LLC until October 2019 and has served as Chief Executive Officer from December 2009 to July 2015 and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Carter/Validus REIT Investment Management Company from July 2015 to April 2018. Mr. Carter served as Executive Chairman of CV REIT Management Company, LLC until October 2019 and served as Co-Chief Executive Officer from October 2015 to April 2018. Mr. Carter also served on the Board of Managers for Validus/Strategic Capital Partners, LLC (now Strategic Capital Management Holdings, LLC) from November 2010 to August 2014. Mr. Carter founded and serves as Chairman of the board of directors of Carter Multifamily Growth & Income Fund, LLC. He also serves as Executive Chairman and as a member of the investment committee of the advisor, Carter Multifamily Growth & Income Advisors, LLC, and as Executive Chairman of the sponsor, Carter Multifamily Fund Management Company, LLC. In March 2019, Mr. Carter founded and serves as Executive Chairman and member of the Investment Committee at Carter Exchange Fund Management, LLC. He also serves as Executive Chairman of CX Reagan Crossing Manager, LLC. Mr. Carter also serves as Executive Chairman of Carter Funds and Allegiant Management, which was formed in November 2019 to provide property management services to the Carter Fund Properties. Mr. Carter also serves as Chairman of the board of directors of Carter Multifamily Growth & Income Fund II, LLC. He also serves as Executive Chairman and as a member of the investment committee of the advisor of Carter Multifamily Growth & Income Fund II, LLC. Mr. Carter has more than 38 years of real estate experience in all aspects of leasing, asset management, acquisitions, finance, investment and corporate advisory services. Mr. Carter served as Vice Chairman and a principal of Carter & Associates, L.L.C., or Carter & Associates, one of the principals of our sponsor, from January 2000 to June 2016. Mr. Carter has served in such capacities since he merged his company, Newport Partners, LLC, or Newport Partners, to Carter & Associates in January 2000. Mr. Carter founded Newport Partners in November 1989 and grew the company into a full-service real estate firm with approximately 63 associates throughout Florida. Prior to November 1989, Mr. Carter worked for two years at Trammel Crow Company. In the early 1980s, he spent five years at Citicorp where he focused primarily on tax shelter, Industrial Revenue Bonds (IRBs) and other real estate financing transactions. He also was a founding board member of GulfShore Bank (currently Seacoast Bank), a community bank located in Tampa, Florida, serving on the Board from August 2007 until the Bank was sold in April 2017. Mr. Carter is a licensed real estate broker, a member of the IPA Board and Executive Committee, a member of IPA’s PAC Board and is a member of NAREIT’s Public Non-Listed REIT Council

64

---

Table of Contents

Executive Committee. Mr. Carter obtained a Bachelor of Science in economics with a minor in mathematics from St. Lawrence University in Canton, New York in 1982 and a Master of Business Administration from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts in 1989. Mr. Carter was selected to serve as a director because he has significant real estate experience in various areas. He has expansive knowledge of the real estate industry and has relationships with chief executives and other senior management at numerous real estate companies. Mr. Carter brings a unique and valuable perspective to our board of directors.

Michael A. Seton has served as a director of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc. since July 2018, Chief Executive Officer since April 2018 and as our President since March 2015. He also previously served as the Chief Executive Officer of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. from April 2018 until its sale in October 2019 and as the President of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. from March 2015 until its sale in October 2019. Mr. Seton also served as a member of the Investment Committee of Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC from November 2010 until its sale in October 2019. He also serves as Chief Executive Officer of Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC, served as Co-Chief Executive Officer from August 2015 to April 2018, and has served as the President and a member of the Investment Committee of Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC since January 2013. Mr. Seton co-founded and serves as the Chief Executive Officer of our sponsor, Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC, and served as Co-Chief Executive Officer from July 2015 to April 2018 and as President since January 2013. Mr. Seton served as the Chief Executive Officer of Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC from April 2018 until its sale in October 2019, served as the Co-Chief Executive Officer from August 2015 to April 2018, as the Chief Investment Officer from July 2011 to April 2012, and has served as the President of Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC from December 2009 until its sale in October 2019. He co-founded and served as Chief Executive Officer of Carter/Validus REIT Investment Management Company, LLC until its sale in October 2019, served as Co-Chief Executive Officer from July 2015 to April 2018 and served as President of Carter/Validus REIT Investment Management Company, LLC from December 2009 until its sale in October 2019. Mr. Seton has served as the Chief Executive Officer of CV REIT Management Company, LLC since March 2018 and served as Co-Chief Executive Officer from October 2015 to April 2018. Mr. Seton previously served as Chief Executive Officer of CV Data Center Growth & Income Fund Manager, LLC from May 2018, its inception, until the sale of its management business in December 2019. He also served on the Investment Committee of CV Data Center Growth & Income REIT Advisors, LLC from May 2018 until December 2019. Mr. Seton has 25 years of real estate investment and finance experience. From December 1996 until June 2009, Mr. Seton worked for Eurohypo AG (including its predecessor organizations) in New York, New York. At Eurohypo AG, Mr. Seton was a Managing Director and Division Head in the Originations Group, leading a team of professionals in the origination, structuring, documentation, closing and syndication of real estate financings for private developers, traded and non-traded public real estate investment trusts, and real estate operating companies. Real estate finance transactions in which Mr. Seton was involved included both on and off-balance sheet executions, including senior debt and mezzanine financings. Mr. Seton has been directly involved in over $35 billion in acquisitions and financings during his real estate career. Mr. Seton obtained a Bachelor of Science in economics from Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee in 1994.

Kay C. Neely has served as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc. and Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC since September 2018, and as Secretary of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc. and Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC since June 2019. Ms. Neely has also served as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC from June 2019 until its sale in October 2019. Ms. Neely has also served as the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC since June 2019 and Carter/Validus REIT Investment Management Company, LLC from June 2019 until its sale in October 2019. In addition, Ms. Neely has served as the Executive Vice President of Finance and Accounting of CV Data Center Growth & Income REIT Advisors, LLC from November 2018 to December 2019, and has served as President of CV Data Center Growth & Income Fund Manager, LLC and Chief Executive Officer of CV Data Center Real Estate Management Services, LLC from June 2019 to December 2019. Ms. Neely served as the Senior Vice President of Accounting of Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC from January 2016 through September 2018, and as the Senior Vice President of Accounting of Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC from January 2016 through June 2019, where she was responsible for the oversight of the accounting and financial reporting functions, as well as managing all accounting department personnel. Ms. Neely brings approximately 19 years of real estate accounting and operations experience. Ms. Neely began her career with KPMG LLP in 1999 as a staff accountant in the audit practice and became a manager in June 2003, serving in such capacity until June 2005. From June 2005 to January 2008, Ms. Neely was an audit senior manager with KPMG LLP, where she planned, organized, staffed and administered audit engagements for public and private entities primarily in the real estate sector, including real estate investment trusts and investment funds. From March 2010 to January 2016, Ms. Neely was Associate Director of Audit Resource Management at KPMG LLP, where she managed the daily operations and financial planning for audit practices in 10 offices located in the Southeast and Puerto Rico, which consisted of over 400 audit partners, managers and staff. Ms. Neely graduated in the top 10% of her class at Emory University, Goizueta Business School in Atlanta, Georgia in 1998 with a Bachelor of Science in business administration with concentrations in accounting and finance. She holds a current Certified Public Accountant license in the state of Georgia.

65

---

Table of Contents

Randall Greene has been an independent director since April 2014. He has over 40 years of experience in real estate management, mortgage banking, construction and property development. Mr. Greene served as Vice President of Charter Mortgage Co. and as President of its subsidiary, St. John’s Management Company, from 1975 to 1977, where he managed more than 3,500 multifamily units and 300,000 square feet of commercial and retail space throughout Florida. He also was President and Chief Executive Officer of Coastland Corporation of Florida (formerly Nasdaq: CLFL), a community developer in Florida, from 1976 to 1986, in which he supervised the development of more than 2000 acres of residential and commercial properties, the construction of more than 500 homes and a number of commercial and retail developments. From 1986 to 1993, Mr. Greene was the President and a director of Beggins/Greene, Inc., which was the principal developer of Symphony Isles, a waterfront community in Apollo Beach, Florida. From 1992 to 1995, Mr. Greene was a consultant for Eastbrokers, A.B., in which he consulted on the acquisition of hotels and commercial properties throughout Eastern Europe. Mr. Greene has served as the Director and an Audit Committee Member for Carter Multifamily Growth & Income Fund since December 2017 and an Audit Committee Member for Carter Multifamily Growth & Income Fund II since March 2020. Also, Mr. Greene currently serves as the Managing Partner and a director for Greene Capital Partners, LLC, an investment and advisory firm, and has been in this position since 1999, as well as President and a Director of ITR Capital Management, LLC, an investment management firm, positions he has held since September 2009. Mr. Greene also served as the Chief Operating Officer of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection from September 2011 through March 2015. Mr. Greene also served as an independent director of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. from July 2010 to October 2019. Mr. Greene has also been an executive coach for more than 50 Tampa-area CEOs through Vistage Florida since November 2004, and currently coaches 20 CEOs. Mr. Greene was a member of the Florida Chapter of the Young Presidents’ Organization from 1980 to 1999 and served as Florida Chapter Chairman in 1995. He is a member of the World Presidents’ Organization, Tampa Young Presidents’ Organization Forum III, Association for Corporate Growth, Leadership Tampa Alumni, and the Financial Planning Association. Mr. Greene is also a Certified Financial Planner. He has been honored as an Outstanding Young Man of America, as an Alumnus of the Year by Phi Kappa Tau Fraternity and is a member of Florida Blue Key. Mr. Greene obtained a Bachelor of Science with distinction from Eckerd College in St. Petersburg, Florida in 1986 and a Master of Business Administration from The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 1988. Mr. Greene was selected to serve as a director due to his knowledge of the real estate and mortgage banking industries and his previous service as the President and Chief Executive Officer of a public company that was a community developer. Mr. Greene’s experience assists the company in managing and operating as a public company in the real estate industry.

Jonathan Kuchin has been an independent director since April 2014. Mr. Kuchin, a certified public accountant, has more than 29 years of experience in public accounting, focusing on public companies and their financial and tax issues, including initial public offerings, public financings, mergers and acquisitions, compensation issues (i.e., options, warrants, phantom stock, restricted stock), and implementation and compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or SOX. Mr. Kuchin served as an independent director of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. from March 2011 to October 2019. On June 30, 2010, Mr. Kuchin retired as a tax partner from PricewaterhouseCoopers, or PwC. At retirement, he was a real estate tax partner in the New York City office, where he focused on public and private REIT clients and on SEC reporting aspects of public REITs, including accounting for income taxes and uncertainty of income taxes, as well as compliance with SOX. He served in that capacity from June 2006 until his retirement date. From September 2004 to June 2006, Mr. Kuchin was a tax service partner for large corporations at PwC in the New York City office, where he focused on PwC audit clients and their issues relating to accounting for income taxes, compliance with SOX, deferred tax studies, first SEC filings and conversion to GAAP. Prior to June 2006, Mr. Kuchin served as the tax partner in charge of the PwC Seattle office and focused his practice on large public companies and the issues related to SEC filings, accounting for income taxes, SOX, and all other tax issues for public companies. In addition to his client responsibilities in Seattle, he managed the tax practice of 85 tax professionals including partners specializing in international tax, state and local tax, financial service tax and private companies. From October 1988 to July 1997, when he was admitted to the Coopers and Lybrand partnership, Mr. Kuchin held various positions with Coopers & Lybrand. Mr. Kuchin obtained a Bachelor of Science in business economics from the University of California, Santa Barbara in March of 1981. Mr. Kuchin was selected to serve as an independent director because of his significant real estate experience and his expansive knowledge in the public accounting and real estate industries.

Ronald Rayevich has been an independent director since April 2014. He has been active in residential and commercial real estate and investment management since 1965. In 1995, following an early retirement, Mr. Rayevich formed Raymar Associates, Inc. and since that time has been active as a commercial real estate consultant. Recent clients include Carlyle Realty, L.P., a Washington, DC based real estate investment arm of the Carlyle Group (1996 to 2011) and Advance Realty, a New Jersey based real estate investment and development company (1995 through 2012 and 2015 to 2019), where he served as a member of its Advisory Board. Mr. Rayevich also served as an independent director of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. from July 2010 to October 2019. Mr. Rayevich spent most of his career with Prudential Insurance Company (now Prudential Financial) (1965 to 1979 and from 1985 to the end of 1994), last serving as President and COO of The Prudential Realty Group with responsibility for the management of the insurance company’s then $6.5 billion commercial real estate portfolio. From 1982 to 1985, Mr. Rayevich was Managing Director, Investment Banking, with Prudential-Bache Securities

66

---

Table of Contents

(now Wells Fargo Advisors). And from 1979 to 1982, he served as Vice President for Investments at Columbia University with management responsibility for the university’s entire endowment. Mr. Rayevich holds a Bachelor of Arts in history from The Citadel (1964) and a Master of Business Administration with a specialization in Finance from Florida State University (1971). In 1997 he served as National President (now-Chairman) of NAIOP, the Commercial Real Estate Development Association. As a Director Emeritus of this 19,000-member commercial real estate association, he was the founder of its National Forums program and founding Chairman and Governor of the NAIOP Research Foundation, where he continues to be active as Chair of its Audit and Investment Committees. Since 1991 he has been a Full Member of the Urban Land Institute. He has served for 12 years (2003 to 2015) as a member of The Citadel Trust, which manages a $90 million portion of The Citadel’s endowment and was elected its Chairman for the maximum term of six years. Mr. Rayevich was selected to serve as an independent director due to his significant experience in the real estate and financial services industries and he brings valuable knowledge and insight into the real estate investment process.

Roger Pratt has been an independent director and member of the Audit Committee of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc. since July 2018. Mr. Pratt currently serves as Senior Advisor to the Elite International Investment Fund. Mr. Pratt was the Managing Director for Prudential Real Estate Investors (PREI) from 1995 until his retirement in 2014. In this capacity he served as a senior leader at PREI, which over the course of his 32-year career with PREI became a global real estate manager with over $50 billion in gross assets under management. Mr. Pratt served as a member of PREI’s U.S., Latin American and Global Investment and Management Committees. Mr. Pratt directed open-end, closed-end, and single client account funds, and played a leading role in raising capital from more than 100 institutional investors including public, corporate and union funds as well as foundations and endowments. As the Co-Chief Risk & Investment Officer at PREI from 2012 to 2014, Mr. Pratt developed a strategic plan for PREI’s global proprietary capital portfolio, initiated a global portfolio review process, revamped and standardized the firm’s investment committee cases, created a Global Investment Committee, and instituted a “scorecard” for new products and funds. As a US Senior Portfolio Manager at PREI from 1995 to 2011, he directed open-end, closed-end and single client funds with gross assets over $13 billion during his tenure. From 1992 to 1995, he was the Portfolio Manager, and from 1995 to 2011 the Senior Portfolio Manager, of Prudential’s enhanced core equity real estate portfolio, PRISA II. On behalf of PRISA II, he served on the board of trustees of Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc. from 1997 to 1999 (formerly NYSE: HOT). In 2003, Mr. Pratt developed and launched PRISA III, serving as its Senior Portfolio Manager until 2010. He also directed PREI’s US Single Client accounts from 1997 to 2011, and its Senior Housing platform from 2003 to 2010. Mr. Pratt began his career with the Prudential Realty Group (PRG) in 1982 as an asset manager and later served as the head of PRG’s New Jersey regional office and co-head of PRG’s national development portfolio. Mr. Pratt earned a Master of Regional Planning in 1976 from the University of North Carolina and a Master of Business Administration in 1982 as a Dean’s Scholar from the University of North Carolina. He received his B.A. as a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia in 1974. From 1976 to 1980, he served as a Community Development Planner for the State of North Carolina. Mr. Pratt serves on the Wood Center Real Estate Studies Advisory Board at the University of North Carolina, the Foundation Board of the Mason School of Business at the College of William and Mary, the Board of Directors of the Schumann Fund for New Jersey, and the Board of Directors of The George Washington University Museum and The Textile Museum in Washington, D.C. Mr. Pratt was selected to serve as an independent director because of his significant real estate and capital markets experience.

Robert M. Winslow has been a director since July 2016. He has also served as a member of the Investment Committee of Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC since January 2013. Mr. Winslow served as the Executive Vice President of Construction, Development and Special Projects of Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC from May 2015 to August 2018. Mr. Winslow also served as the Executive Vice President of Asset Management of Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC from January 2013 to May 2015. He has also served as a member of the Management Committee and Investment Committee of Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC from December 2009 to October 2019. Mr. Winslow also served as the Executive Vice President of Construction, Development and Special Projects of Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC from May 2015 to August 2018. He also served as the Executive Vice President of Asset Management of Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC from December 2009 to May 2015. Mr. Winslow is also a co-owner and principal in SC Distributors, LLC, our dealer manager, and its affiliated entities that sponsor private real estate investment programs. He has more than 45 years of real estate experience throughout the United States. Mr. Winslow has packaged and managed more than 50 commercial investments in hotels, offices, shopping centers and industrial properties with a value exceeding $300 million. He has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Global Building and Consulting Corporation, a multi-service residential and commercial investment company specializing in performance-oriented management of real estate assets since 1996. Mr. Winslow is a licensed real estate broker and state certified general contractor in Florida, and also currently provides consulting services, including to Winter Park Health Foundation and Advent Health. From 1987 to 1989, Mr. Winslow structured a joint venture with Prentiss Properties to serve as the Florida Development Manager for proposed office projects for tenants including, among others, AT&T and Loral Federal Systems. In July 1980, Mr. Winslow founded and served as managing General Partner of Global Properties, LTD through 1985. Global Properties, LTD was a full-service real estate brokerage firm that grew to 120 sales associates, and was the first firm with whom Merrill Lynch Realty signed a Letter of Intent to purchase when it entered the Orlando market. Prior to founding Global Properties, LTD in 1980, Mr. Winslow served as Vice President of Winter Park Land Company, an old line private real estate holding company where he reversed two unprofitable divisions and

67

---

Table of Contents

created compatible new construction and real estate brokerage strategies. Mr. Winslow obtained a Bachelor of Arts from Rollins College in business administration/economics in 1971 and an MBA in International Finance from the Roy E. Crummer Graduate School of Business at Rollins College in Winter Park, Florida in 1973. Mr. Winslow currently serves on the board of Catholic Volunteers of Florida, a non-profit volunteer organization. Mr. Winslow was selected to serve as a director because of his significant real estate experience and his expansive knowledge in real estate industries.

Our executive officers have stated that there are no arrangements or understandings of any kind between them and any other person relating to their appointments as executive officers.

Committees of our Board of Directors

Audit Committee

The board of directors maintains one standing committee, the audit committee, to assist in fulfilling its responsibilities. The audit committee is composed of Messrs. Kuchin, Greene, Rayevich and Pratt, all four of whom are independent directors. The audit committee reports regularly to the full board and annually evaluates its performance. The audit committee meets periodically during the year, usually in conjunction with regular meetings of the board. The audit committee, by approval of at least a majority of the members, selects the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our annual financial statements, reviews with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approves the audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, considers the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviews the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. Our board of directors has adopted a charter for the audit committee that sets forth its specific functions and responsibilities. The audit committee charter can be located on our website at www.cvmissioncriticalreit2.com by clicking on “Corporate Governance,” and then on “Audit Committee Charter.”

Although our shares are not listed for trading on any national securities exchange, all four members of the audit committee meet the current independence and qualifications requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, as well as our charter and applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. While all four members of the audit committee have significant financial and/or accounting experience, the board of directors has determined that Mr. Kuchin satisfies the SEC’s requirements for an “audit committee financial expert” and has designated Mr. Kuchin as our audit committee financial expert. The audit committee met five times during 2019.

Compensation Committee

Our board of directors believes that it is appropriate for our board not to have a standing compensation committee based upon the fact that our executive officers, including our principal financial officer, and non-independent directors do not receive compensation directly from us for services rendered to us, and we do not intend to pay any compensation directly to our executive officers or non-independent directors.

Nominating Board of Directors — Functions

We believe that our board of directors is qualified to perform the functions typically delegated to a nominating committee, and that the formation of a separate committee is not necessary at this time. Therefore, all members of our board of directors develop the criteria necessary for prospective members of our board of directors and participate in the consideration of director nominees. The primary functions of the members of our board of directors relating to the consideration of director nominees are to conduct searches and interviews for prospective director candidates, if necessary, review background information for all candidates for the board of directors, including those recommended by stockholders, and formally propose the slate of director nominees for election by the stockholders at the annual meeting.

Special Committee

Our board of directors established a special committee. The special committee's function is limited to the evaluation, negotiation and approval of any transaction that our board of directors specifically identifies and delegates authority to the special committee. The members of the special committee are each of our four independent directors.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires each director, officer and individual beneficially owning more than 10% of a registered security of the Company to file with the SEC, within specified time frames, initial statements of beneficial ownership (Form 3) and statements of changes in beneficial ownership (Forms 4 and 5) of common stock of the Company. Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to us during and with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, or written representations that no additional forms were required, to the best of our knowledge, all of the filings by the Company’s directors and executive officers were made on a timely basis, except that a Form 4 was inadvertently filed late by Ms. Neely and each of Messrs. Seton, Kuchin, Carter, Greene, Rayevich and Winslow.

68

---

Table of Contents

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to all members of our board of directors, our officers and employees, and the employees of our advisor. The policy may be located on our website at www.cvmissioncriticalreit2.com by clicking on “Corporate Governance,” and then on “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.” If, in the future, we amend, modify or waive a provision in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, we may, rather than filing a Current Report on Form 8-K, satisfy the disclosure requirement by posting such information on our website as necessary.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Compensation of Executive Officers

We have no employees. Our executive officers do not receive compensation directly from us for services rendered to us, and we do not intend to pay any compensation directly to our executive officers. As a result, we do not have, and our board of directors has not considered, a compensation policy or program for our executive officers. In addition, our board of directors believes that it is appropriate for our board not to have a standing compensation committee based upon the fact that our executive officers, including our principal financial officer, and non-independent directors do not receive compensation directly from us for services rendered to us, and we do not intend to pay any compensation directly to our executive officers or non-independent directors.

Our executive officers are also officers of our advisor, and its affiliates, including our Property Manager, and are compensated by these entities, in part, for their services to us. We pay fees to such entities under our advisory agreement and our property management and leasing agreement. We also reimburse our Advisor for its provision of administrative services, including related personnel costs, subject to certain limitations. A description of the fees that we pay to our Advisor and Property Manager or their affiliates is found in the “Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons” within Item 13. "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence."

Compensation of Directors

Directors who are also officers or employees of our Advisor or their affiliates (Messrs. Carter, Winslow and Seton) do not receive any special or additional remuneration for service on the board of directors or any of its committees. During the portion of the year ended December 31, 2019 through November 7, 2019, each non-employee director received compensation for service on the board of directors and any of its committees as provided below:

•	an annual retainer of $40,000;

•	an additional annual retainer of $10,000 to the chairman of the audit committee;

•	$2,000 for each quarterly in-person board meeting;

•	$2,000 for each committee meeting attended in person ($2,500 for attendance by the chairperson of the audit committee at each meeting of the audit committee);

•	$5,000 per month for each of the special committee board members beginning December 1, 2019, and ending on the earlier of (i) the consummation of a transaction and (ii) dissolution of the special committee;

•	$500 per board or committee meeting attended by telephone conference; and

•	in the event that there is a meeting of the board of directors and one or more committees on a single day, the fees paid to each director will be limited to $2,500 per day ($3,000 per day for the chairman of the audit committee, if there is a meeting of that committee).

All directors received reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the board of directors.

Further, we authorized and reserved 300,000 shares of our Class A common stock for issuance under the Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc. 2014 Restricted Share Plan, or the Incentive Plan, and we granted 3,000 shares of Class A common stock to each of our independent directors at the time we satisfied the minimum offering requirement in our offering in connection with each director's initial election or appointment to the board of directors. The Incentive Plan provides for annual grants of 3,000 shares of Class A common stock to each of our independent directors in connection with such independent director’s subsequent re-election to our board of directors, provided, such independent director is an independent director of our company during such annual period. Restricted stock issued to our independent directors will vest over a four-year period following the first anniversary of the date of grant in increments of 25% per annum. Please see below under "Amended and Restated Incentive Plan" for information on the A&R Incentive Plan, as defined below, and "Independent

69

---

Table of Contents

Director Compensation" for the cash compensation that the independent directors are entitled to receive as of November 7, 2019.

Amended and Restated Incentive Plan

On March 6, 2020, our board of directors approved the Amended and Restated 2014 Restricted Share Plan, or the A&R Incentive Plan, pursuant to which we have the authority and power to grant awards of restricted shares of our Class A common stock to our directors, officers and employees (if we ever have employees), employees of our Advisor and its affiliates, employees of entities that provide services to us, directors of our Advisor or of entities that provide services to us, certain of the our consultants and certain consultants to our Advisor and its affiliates or to entities that provide services to us. Our board of directors has authorized a total of 5,000,000 Class A common stock for issuance under the A&R Incentive Plan on a fully diluted basis at any time.

Independent Director Compensation

On March 6, 2020, our board of directors determined to revise the amounts of restricted Class A common stock the independent directors are entitled to receive each year as provided below.

On March 10, 2020, we granted each independent director 2,415 restricted Class A common stock, with a per share price of $8.65, and beginning July 1, 2020 and each July 1 thereafter, we will grant each independent director $60,000 in restricted shares of Class A common stock. Restricted stock issued to our independent directors will vest over a three-year period following the first anniversary of the date of grant in increments of 33.34% per annum.

On March 6, 2020, our board of directors also approved the following annual compensation amounts for our independent directors, effective as of November 7, 2019: (i) a cash retainer of $90,000 per year (the chairperson of the audit committee will receive an additional $15,000 per year) plus (ii) $2,500 for each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting the director attends in person.

On March 19, 2020, due to the current coronavirus (COVID-19) situation, our board of directors revised the meeting fees to be paid to each independent director to include regularly scheduled quarterly meetings that are required to be held telephonically. Therefore, each independent director will receive $2,500 for each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting the director attends (whether the meeting is in person or telephonic).

Director Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our director compensation during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019:

Name		Fees Earned or Paid in Cash				Stock Awards				Option Awards				Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation				Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensations Earnings				All Other Compensation				Total
John E. Carter		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
Michael A. Seton		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
Robert M. Winslow		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
Jonathan Kuchin (1)		$	82,222			$	27,750			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	20,648		(2)	$	130,620
Randall Greene (1)		$	70,028			$	27,750			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	13,181		(3)	$	110,959
Ronald Rayevich (1)		$	100,028			$	27,750			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	11,923		(4)	$	139,701
Roger Pratt (1)		$	100,028			$	27,750			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	5,155		(5)	$	132,933

(1)	On September 25, 2019, the independent director was awarded 3,000 restricted shares of Class A common stock in connection with his re-election to the board of directors. The grant date fair value of the stock was $9.25 per share for an aggregate amount of $27,750. As of December 31, 2019, all of the 3,000 shares of common stock remain unvested.

(2)	Of this amount, $13,689 reflects the dollar value of distributions paid in connection with the stock awards granted to our independent directors and $6,959 represents reimbursement of travel and other expenses incurred by directors to attend various director meetings.

(3)	Of this amount, $13,181 reflects the dollar value of distributions paid in connection with the stock awards granted to our independent directors.

70

---

Table of Contents

(4)	Of this amount, $11,239 reflects the dollar value of distributions paid in connection with the stock awards granted to our independent directors and $684 represents reimbursement of travel and other expenses incurred by directors to attend various director meetings.

(5)	Of this amount, $2,430 reflects the dollar value of distributions paid in connection with the stock awards granted to our independent directors and $2,725 represents reimbursement of travel and other expenses incurred by directors to attend various director meetings.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

We do not have a standing compensation committee and do not separately compensate our executive officers. Therefore, none of our executive officers participated in any deliberations regarding executive compensation. There are no interlocks or insider participation as to compensation decisions required to be disclosed pursuant to SEC regulations.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, John E. Carter, Michael A. Seton and Kay C. Neely also served as officers, directors and/or key personnel of our Advisor, our Property Manager, and/or other affiliated entities. As such, they did not receive any separate compensation from us for services as our directors and/or executive officers. For information regarding transactions with such related parties, see the section entitled “Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Person.” within Item 13. "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence."

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans and Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.

We adopted the Incentive Plan pursuant to which our board of directors has the authority to grant restricted or deferred stock awards to persons eligible under the plan. The maximum number of shares of our Class A common stock that may be issued pursuant to the Incentive Plan was 300,000 as of December 31, 2019, subject to adjustment under specified circumstances. On March 6, 2020, our board of directors approved the A&R Incentive Plan, pursuant to which we have the authority and power to grant awards of restricted shares of our Class A common stock to our directors, officers and employees (if we ever have employees), employees of our Advisor and its affiliates, employees of entities that provide services to us, directors of our Advisor or of entities that provide services to us, certain of the our consultants and certain consultants to our Advisor and its affiliates or to entities that provide services to us. Our board of directors has authorized a total of 5,000,000 Class A common stock for issuance under the A&R Incentive Plan on a fully diluted basis at any time.

The following table provides information regarding the Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2019:

Plan Category		Number of Securities to Be Issued upon Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights			Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights			Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)		—			—			240,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—			—			—
Total		—			—			240,000

(1)

On September 25, 2019, we granted an aggregate of 12,000 restricted shares of Class A common stock to our independent directors, which were awarded in connection with each independent director’s re-election to our board of directors. The fair value of each share of our restricted common stock was estimated at the date of grant at $9.25 per share. As of December 31, 2019, we had issued an aggregate of 60,000 shares of restricted stock to our independent directors in connection with their appointment or re-election to our board of directors. Restricted stock issued to our independent directors vests over a four-year period following the first anniversary of the date of grant in increments of 25% per annum.

The shares described above were not registered under the Securities Act and were issued in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

71

---

Table of Contents

Beneficial Ownership of Equity Securities

The following table sets forth information as of March 24, 2020, regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each person known by us to own 5.0% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, each of our directors, and each named executive officer, and our directors and executive officers as a group. The percentage of beneficial ownership is calculated based on 166,408,000 shares of Class A common stock outstanding, 12,544,000 shares of Class I common stock outstanding, 38,939,000 shares of Class T common stock outstanding and 3,496,000 shares of Class T2 common stock outstanding, as of March 24, 2020.

Name of Beneficial Owner (1)		Number of Class A Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (2)			Percentage of All Class A Common Stock
Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC		29,362			*
Directors
John E. Carter		(3	)		*
Michael A. Seton		(4	)		*
Robert M. Winslow		(5	)		*
Jonathan Kuchin (6)		40,129			*
Randall Greene (7)		39,536			*
Ronald Rayevich (8)		33,054			*
Roger Pratt (9)		8,833			*
Executive Officers
Kay C. Neely		(10	)
All officers and directors as a group (8 persons)		150,914			*

*	Represents less than 1% of the outstanding Class A common stock.

(1)	The address of each beneficial owner listed is c/o Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., 4890 W. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 650, Tampa, Florida 33609.

(2)

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities and shares issuable pursuant to options, warrants and similar rights held by the respective person or group which may be exercised within 60 days following March 24, 2020. Except as otherwise indicated by footnote, and subject to community property laws where applicable, the persons named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.

(3)	Mr. Carter is Executive Chairman of Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC, which directly owns 29,362 shares of Class A common stock in our company. Mr. Carter disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest.

(4)	Mr. Seton is the Chief Executive Officer of Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC, which directly owns 29,362 shares of Class A common stock in our company. Mr. Seton disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest.

(5)	Mr. Winslow directly or indirectly controls Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC, which directly owns 29,362 shares of Class A common stock in our company. Mr. Winslow disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest.

(6)	Represents restricted shares of our Class A common stock issued to the beneficial owner in connection with his initial election and his subsequent election to the board of directors in the amount of 24,767 and fully vested shares converted in the REIT Merger in the amount of 15,362.

(7)	Represents restricted shares of our Class A common stock issued to the beneficial owner in connection with his initial election and his subsequent election to the board of directors in the amount of 22,729 and fully vested shares converted in the REIT Merger in the amount of 16,807.

(8)	Represents restricted shares of our Class A common stock issued to the beneficial owner in connection with his initial election and his subsequent election to the board of directors in the amount of 20,415 and fully vested shares converted in the REIT Merger in the amount of 12,639.

72

---

Table of Contents

(9)	Represents restricted shares of our Class A common stock issued to the beneficial owner in connection with his initial election and his subsequent election to the board of directors.

(10)	Ms. Neely is the Chief Financial Officer of Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC, which directly owns 29,362 shares of Class A common stock in our company. Ms. Neely disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC, except to the extent of her pecuniary interest.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons

Our independent directors have reviewed the material transactions between our affiliates and us during the year ended December 31, 2019. Set forth below is a description of the transactions with affiliates. We believe that we have executed all of the transactions set forth below on terms that are fair and reasonable to us and on terms no less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties.

Each of our executive officers and our non-independent directors, Messrs. Carter, Winslow and Seton, is affiliated with our Advisor and its affiliates. In addition, each of our executive officers also serves as an officer of our Advisor, Property Manager and/or other affiliated entities.

Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC, or our sponsor, owns a 77.5% managing member interest in our Advisor. Strategic Capital Management Holdings, LLC, which is wholly owned by Validus/Strategic Capital, and is the owner of Strategic Capital Advisory Services, LLC and SC Distributors, LLC, owns a 22.5% non-managing member interest in our Advisor, and has no voting interest in our Advisor. Our Sponsor is directly or indirectly controlled by Messrs. Carter and Seton, as they, along with others who are not our executive officers or directors, are members of our Sponsor.

We are externally advised by our Advisor, which is our affiliate, pursuant to an advisory agreement by and among us, our Operating Partnership and our Advisor. Our Advisor supervises and manages our day-to-day operations and selects the properties and real estate-related investments we acquire, subject to the oversight and approval of our board of directors. Our Advisor also provides marketing, sales and client services related to real estate on our behalf. Our Advisor engages affiliated entities to provide various services to us. Our Advisor is managed by, and is a subsidiary of our Sponsor. We have no direct employees. Substantially all of our business is managed by our Advisor. The employees of our Advisor and other affiliates provide services to us related to acquisitions, property management, asset management, accounting, investor relations, and all other administrative services.

SC Distributors, LLC, an affiliate of our Advisor, served as the Dealer Manager of our Offerings. The Dealer Manager received fees for services related to our Offerings. We continue to pay the Dealer Manager a distribution and servicing fee with respect to its Class T and T2 shares that were sold in our Offerings.

Refer to Note 11—"Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements" to our consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Amendments to CVREIT II Advisory Agreement

On April 11, 2019, concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, we, REIT I Operating Partnership, our Operating Partnership and our Advisor entered into the Third Amended and Restated CVREIT II Advisory Agreement, or the Third A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement, which became effective as of the effective time of the REIT Merger.

First Amendment to Third A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement

On October 3, 2019, we, REIT I Operating Partnership, the Operating Partnership and our Advisor entered into the First Amendment to the Third A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement, or the First Amendment, which became effective on October 4, 2019, simultaneously with the effectiveness of the Third A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement at the effective time of the REIT Merger. The purpose of the First Amendment was to clarify that any subordinated fees payable to our Advisor under the Third A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement will be offset by any distributions our Advisor or any of its affiliates receives as a special limited partner of our Operating Partnership or REIT I Operating Partnership.

Fourth A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement

Following the completion of the Contributions (as defined herein), on October 4, 2019, we, our Operating Partnership and our Advisor entered into the Fourth Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement, or the Fourth A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement, in order to, among other things, clarify that REIT I Operating Partnership will not be a party to the Fourth A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement and that any subordinated fees the Advisor would have received under the Third A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement would be made to the Advisor in its capacity as a special limited partner of our Operating Partnership pursuant to the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement (as defined herein).

73

---

Table of Contents

Amendments to CVOP II Operating Partnership Agreement

Fifth Amendment to CVOP II Operating Partnership Agreement

Concurrent with the execution of the Merger Agreement, we entered into an amendment, or the Fifth Amendment, to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of our Operating Partnership, by and between us and our Advisor, as amended, or the CVOP II Partnership Agreement. The purpose of the Fifth Amendment was to revise the economic interests of our Advisor by providing that our Advisor would not receive any subordinated distributions as a special limited partner of our Operating Partnership. The Fifth Amendment was to become effective as of the effective time of the REIT Merger.

Sixth Amendment to CVOP II Operating Partnership Agreement

On October 3, 2019, we and our Advisor entered into the Sixth Amendment to CVOP II Partnership Agreement, or the Sixth Amendment. The purpose of the Sixth Amendment is to rescind the Fifth Amendment in its entirety such that the revisions to the CVOP II Partnership Agreement set forth in the Fifth Amendment did not go into effect.

A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement

Following the completion of the Contributions (as defined herein), on October 4, 2019, we and our Advisor entered into the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of our Operating Partnership, or the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement. The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement amends and restates the CVOP II Partnership Agreement in order to, among other things, amend the provisions related to distributions payable to the Advisor upon a Listing (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement), termination of the Fourth A&R Advisory Agreement (unless such termination is by us because of a material breach of the Fourth A&R Advisory Agreement or occurs upon a change of control), and upon an Investment Liquidity Event (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement). The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement also increases the threshold of the Priority Return (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement) from 6.0% to 8.0%, as previously agreed to and disclosed in connection with the REIT Merger.

Omnibus Assignment and Amendment to Property Management and Leasing Agreements

On October 4, 2019, immediately prior to the effective time of the REIT Merger, pursuant to the Omnibus Assignment and Amendment to the Property Management and Leasing Agreements, or the Assignment Amendment, our Property Manager, as assignee, or the Assignee, acquired, and Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services, LLC, as assignor, or the Assignor, assigned, transferred, conveyed, and delivered to the Assignee, all of the Assignor's rights, titles, and interests in the Property Management and Leasing Agreements by and among the Assignor and REIT I Operating Partnership's wholly-owned subsidiaries. Therefore, the Assignee, the property manager for the Company, will act as the property manager and leasing agent for the properties the Company acquired in the REIT Merger.

Operating Partnership Contribution

On October 4, 2019, following completion of the REIT Merger, the Advisor purchased all of Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC's, or CVREIT Advisor, units of ownership interest in REIT I Operating Partnership, or OP Units, and all of CVREIT Advisor's rights and entitlements as a partner of REIT I Operating Partnership, or the CVREIT II Advisor OP Unit Purchase, for an aggregate purchase price of $1,066, pursuant to that certain Partnership Interest Purchase Agreement, or the Purchase Agreement, by and between our Advisor, as buyer, and CVREIT Advisor, as Seller, dated October 4, 2019. On October 4, 2019, REIT I Operating Partnership, we, our Operating Partnership, our Advisor, Merger Sub, and CVOP Partner, LLC, or CVOP Partner, a wholly owned subsidiary of our Operating Partnership, entered into a contribution agreement, or the Contribution Agreement, whereby effective on October 4, 2019, following the CVREIT II Advisor OP Unit Purchase, (i) Merger Sub and our Advisor, each a Contributor, and together, the Contributors, each contributed to our Operating Partnership all of their interests in REIT I Operating Partnership and our Operating Partnership acquired from the Contributors all of the Contributors’ right, title and interest in REIT I Operating Partnership in exchange for limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership, and (ii) our Operating Partnership contributed to CVOP Partner all of its limited OP Units, or collectively, the Contributions.

Amended and Restated REIT I Operating Partnership Agreement

Following the completion of the Contributions, on October 4, 2019, our Operating Partnership, as the general partner of REIT I Operating Partnership, and CVOP Partner, as the limited partner of REIT I Operating Partnership, entered into the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of REIT I Operating Partnership, or the A&R REIT I Operating Partnership Agreement. The primary purpose of the A&R REIT I Operating Partnership Agreement is to provide for the allocation of REIT I Operating Partnership’s profits and losses and distributions of cash and other assets of REIT I Operating Partnership to our Operating Partnership as general partner and CVOP Partner as limited partner of REIT I Operating Partnership.

74

---

Table of Contents

Distribution and Servicing Fees

Through the termination of the Offering on November 27, 2018, we paid the Dealer Manager selling commissions and dealer manager fees in connection with the sale of shares of certain classes of common stock. We continue to pay the Dealer Manager a distribution and servicing fee with respect to its Class T and Class T2 shares of common stock that were sold in our Offerings. Distribution and servicing fees are recorded in the consolidated statements of stockholders' equity as a reduction to equity as incurred.

Acquisition Fees and Expenses

We pay to the Advisor 2.0% of the contract purchase price of each property or asset acquired. In addition, we reimburse the Advisor for acquisition expenses incurred in connection with the selection and acquisition of properties or real estate-related investments (including expenses relating to potential investments that we do not close), such as legal fees and expenses, costs of real estate due diligence, appraisals, non-refundable option payments on properties not acquired, travel and communications expenses, accounting fees and expenses and title insurance premiums, whether or not the property was acquired. Since our formation through December 31, 2019, we reimbursed the Advisor expenses of approximately 0.01% of the aggregate purchase price all of properties acquired. Acquisition fees and expenses associated with the acquisition of properties determined to be business combinations are expensed as incurred, including investment transactions that are no longer under consideration. Acquisition fees and expenses associated with transactions determined to be asset acquisitions are capitalized in total real estate, net, in the consolidated balance sheets.

Asset Management Fees

We pay to the Advisor an asset management fee calculated on a monthly basis in an amount equal to 1/12th of 0.75% of aggregate asset value, which is payable monthly, in arrears.

Operating Expense Reimbursement

We reimburse the Advisor for all operating expenses it paid or incurred in connection with the services provided to us, subject to certain limitations. Expenses in excess of the operating expenses in the four immediately preceding quarters that exceed the greater of (a) 2% of average invested assets or (b) 25% of net income, subject to certain adjustments, will not be reimbursed unless the independent directors determine such excess expenses are justified. We will not reimburse the Advisor for personnel costs in connection with services for which the Advisor receives an acquisition fee or a disposition fee. Operating expenses incurred on our behalf are recorded in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Property Management Fees

In connection with the rental, leasing, operation and management of our properties, we pay the Property Manager, and its affiliates, aggregate fees equal to 3.0% of gross revenues from the properties managed, or property management fees. We reimburse the Property Manager and its affiliates for property-level expenses that any of them pay or incur on our behalf, including certain salaries, bonuses and benefits of persons employed by the Property Manager and its affiliates, except for the salaries, bonuses and benefits of persons who also serve as one of its executive officers. The Property Manager and its affiliates may subcontract the performance of their duties to third parties and pay all or a portion of the property management fee to the third parties with whom they contract for these services. If we contract directly with third parties for such services, we will pay them customary market fees and may pay the Property Manager an oversight fee equal to 1.0% of the gross revenues of the properties managed. In no event will we pay the Property Manager or any affiliate both a property management fee and an oversight fee with respect to any particular property. Property management fees are recorded in rental expenses in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Leasing Commission Fees

We pay the Property Manager a separate fee for the initial lease-up, leasing-up of newly constructed properties or re-leasing to existing tenants. Leasing commission fees are capitalized in other assets, net, in the consolidated balance sheets and amortized over the terms of the related leases.

Construction Management Fees

For acting as general contractor and/or construction manager to supervise or coordinate projects or to provide major repairs or rehabilitation on our properties, we may pay the Property Manager up to 5.0% of the cost of the projects, repairs and/or rehabilitation, as applicable, or construction management fees. Construction management fees are capitalized in real estate, net, in the consolidated balance sheets.

75

---

Table of Contents

Disposition Fees

We pay the Advisor, or its affiliates, if it provides a substantial amount of services (as determined by a majority of our independent directors) in connection with the sale of properties, a disposition fee, equal to the lesser of 1.0% of the contract sales price and one-half of the total brokerage commission paid if a third party broker is also involved, without exceeding the lesser of 6.0% of the contract sales price or a reasonable, customary and competitive real estate commission. As of December 31, 2019, we had not incurred any disposition fees to the Advisor or its affiliates.

Subordinated Participation in Net Sale Proceeds

Prior to the completion of the REIT Merger on October 4, 2019, upon the sale of the Company, the Advisor would have received 15% of the remaining net sale proceeds after return of capital contributions plus payment to investors of a 6.0% annual cumulative, non-compounded return on the capital contributed by investors, or the subordinated participation in net sale proceeds. As of October 4, 2019, we had not incurred any subordinated participation in net sale proceeds to the Advisor or its affiliates. The Fourth A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement, which became effective immediately following the Contributions, does not provide for the payment of a subordinated participation in net sales proceeds to the Advisor or its affiliates.

The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement became effective following completion of the Contributions, and provides that the Advisor, as a special limited partner of CVOP II, would be entitled to a distribution upon an Investment Liquidity Event (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement). The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement also increases the threshold of the Priority Return (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement) from 6.0% to 8.0%, as previously agreed to and disclosed in connection with the REIT Merger.

Subordinated Incentive Listing Fee

Prior to the completion of the REIT Merger on October 4, 2019, upon the listing of our shares on a national securities exchange, the Advisor would have received 15% of the amount by which the sum of our adjusted market value plus distributions exceeded the sum of the aggregate capital contributed by investors plus an amount equal to a 6.0% annual cumulative, non-compounded return to investors, or the subordinated incentive listing fee. As of October 4, 2019, we had not incurred any subordinated incentive listing fees to the Advisor or its affiliates. The Fourth A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement does not provide for the payment of a subordinated incentive listing fee to the Advisor or its affiliates. The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement provides that the Advisor, as a special limited partner of CVOP II, would be entitled to a distribution upon an Investment Liquidity Event (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement). The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement also increases the threshold of the Priority Return (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement) from 6.0% to 8.0%, as previously agreed to and disclosed in connection with the REIT Merger.

Subordinated Distribution Upon Termination Fee

Prior to the completion of the REIT Merger on October 4, 2019, upon termination or non-renewal of the advisory agreement, with or without cause, the Advisor would have been entitled to receive subordinated termination fees from the Operating Partnership equal to 15% of the amount by which the sum of our adjusted market value plus distributions exceeded the sum of the aggregate capital contributed by investors plus an amount equal to an annual 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded return to investors. As of October 4, 2019, we had not incurred any subordinated termination fees to the Advisor or its affiliates. The Fourth A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement does not provide for the payment of a subordinated termination fee to the Advisor or its affiliates. The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement provides that the Advisor, as a special limited partner of CVOP II, would be entitled to a distribution upon the termination of the Fourth A&R Advisory Agreement (unless such termination is by us because of a material breach of the Fourth A&R Advisory Agreement or occurs upon a change of control). The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement also increases the threshold of the Priority Return (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement) from 6.0% to 8.0%, as previously agreed to and disclosed in connection with the REIT Merger.

76

---

Table of Contents

The following table details amounts incurred in connection with our related parties transactions as described above for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (amounts in thousands):

				Incurred
				Year Ended December 31,
Fee		Entity		2019				2018				2017
Distribution and servicing fees		SC Distributors, LLC		$	(563	)	(1)	$	368			$	9,617
Acquisition fees and costs		Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and its affiliates		26,072				4,272				11,979
Asset management fees		Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and its affiliates		16,475				13,114				9,963
Property management fees		Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC		5,403				4,391				3,246
Operating expense reimbursement		Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and its affiliates		4,492				2,692				2,101
Leasing commission fees		Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC		1,241				497				907
Construction management fees		Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC		276				243				719
Total				$	53,396			$	25,577			$	38,532

(1)	Reduction of distribution and servicing fees is a result of repurchases of Class T and Class T2 shares of common stock.

The following table details amounts payable to affiliates in connection with our related parties transactions as described above as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands):

				Payable
				December 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
Fee		Entity
Other offering costs reimbursement		Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and its affiliates		$	—			$	89
Distribution and servicing fees		SC Distributors, LLC		6,210				10,218
Acquisition fees and costs		Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and its affiliates		—				32
Asset management fees		Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and its affiliates		2,100				1,182
Property management fees		Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC		433				420
Operating expense reimbursement		Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and its affiliates		518				421
Leasing commission fees		Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC		299				25
Construction management fees		Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC		199				40
Total				$	9,759			$	12,427

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

In order to reduce or eliminate certain potential conflicts of interest, (A) our charter contains a number of restrictions relating to (1) transactions we enter into with our sponsor, our directors and our advisor and its affiliates, and (2) certain future offerings, and (B) the advisory agreement contains procedures and restrictions relating to the allocation of investment opportunities among entities affiliated with our advisor. These restrictions include, among others, the following:

•

We will not purchase or lease properties from our sponsor, our advisor, any of our directors, or any of their respective affiliates without a determination by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in such transaction that such transaction is fair and reasonable to us and at a price to us no greater than the cost of the property to the seller or lessor unless there is substantial justification for any amount that exceeds such cost and such excess amount is determined to be reasonable. In no event will we acquire any such property at an amount in excess of its current appraised value, as determined by an independent appraiser. We will not sell or lease properties to our sponsor, our advisor, any of our directors, or any of their respective affiliates unless a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction, determines that the transaction is fair and reasonable to us.

•

We will not make any loans to our sponsor, our advisor, any of our directors, or any of their respective affiliates, except that we may make or invest in mortgage loans involving our sponsor, our advisor, our directors or their respective affiliates, if such mortgage loan is insured or guaranteed by a government or government agency or provided, among other things, that an appraisal of the underlying property is obtained from an independent appraiser and the transaction is approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction as fair and reasonable to us and on terms no less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties. Our sponsor, our advisor, any of our directors and any of their respective affiliates will not make loans to us or to joint ventures in which we are a joint venture partner unless approved by a

77

---

Table of Contents

majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction as fair, competitive and commercially reasonable, and no less favorable to us than comparable loans between unaffiliated parties.

•

Our advisor and its affiliates will be entitled to reimbursement, at cost, at the end of each fiscal quarter for actual expenses incurred by them on behalf of us or joint ventures in which we are a joint venture partner; provided, however, that we will not reimburse our advisor at the end of any fiscal quarter for the amount, if any, by which our total operating expenses, including the advisor asset management fee, paid during the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ended exceeded the greater of (i) 2.0% of our average invested assets for such period or (ii) 25.0% of our net income, before any additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves and before any gain from the sale of our assets, for such period, unless our independent directors determine such excess expenses are justified.

•

If an investment opportunity becomes available that is deemed suitable, after our advisor’s and our board of directors’ consideration of pertinent factors, for both us and one or more other entities affiliated with our advisor, and for which more than one of such entities has sufficient uninvested funds, then the entity that has had the longest period of time elapse since it was offered an investment opportunity will first be offered such investment opportunity. In determining whether or not an investment opportunity is suitable for more than one such entity, our advisor and our board of directors shall examine, among others, the following factors:

▪	the anticipated cash flow and the cash requirements of each such entity;

▪	the effect of the acquisition on diversification of each program’s investments by type of property, geographic area and tenant concentration;

▪	the policy of each program relating to leverage of properties;

▪	the income tax effects of the purchase to each program;

▪	the size of the investment; and

▪	the amount of funds available to each program and the length of time such funds have been available for investment.

If a subsequent development, such as a delay in the closing of the acquisition or construction of a property, causes any such investment, in the opinion of our advisor, to be more appropriate for a program other than the program that committed to make the investment, our advisor may determine that another program affiliated with our advisor or its affiliates will make the investment. Our board of directors, including our independent directors, has a duty to ensure that the method used by our advisor for the allocation of the acquisition of properties by two or more affiliated programs seeking to acquire similar types of properties is reasonable and applied fairly to us.

We adopted an asset allocation policy to allocate property acquisitions among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. and any other program sponsored by Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC and its affiliates. All transactions were allocated among us, Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. and any other programs sponsored by Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC by our investment committee in a manner consistent with our general investment allocation policy.

•

We will not accept goods or services from our sponsor, our advisor, our directors, or any of their or its affiliates or enter into any other transaction with our sponsor, our advisor, our directors, or any of their affiliates unless a majority of our directors, including a majority of the independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction, approve such transaction as fair and reasonable to us and on terms and conditions not less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties.

Director Independence

As required by our Charter, a majority of the members of our board of directors must qualify as “independent directors” as affirmatively determined by the board of directors. Our board of directors consults with our legal counsel and counsel to the independent directors, as applicable, to ensure that our board of directors’ determinations are consistent with our charter and applicable securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of “independent director.”

Consistent with these considerations, after review of all relevant transactions or relationships between each director, or any of his family members, and the Company, our senior management and our independent registered public accounting firm, the board has determined that Messrs. Kuchin, Greene, Rayevich and Pratt, who comprise a majority of our board, qualify as independent directors. A copy of our independent director definition, which is contained in our charter and complies with the requirements of the North American Securities Administrators Association’s Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate

78

---

Table of Contents

Investment Trusts, or the NASAA REIT Guidelines, was attached as an appendix to the proxy statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which was filed with the SEC on April 27, 2018. Although our shares are not listed for trading on any national securities exchange, our independent directors also meet the current independence and qualifications requirements of the New York Stock Exchange.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, KPMG LLP, or KPMG, served as our independent registered public accounting firm and provided us with certain audit and non-audit services. KPMG has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2014. The audit committee reviewed the audit and non-audit services performed by KPMG, as well as the fees charged by KPMG for such services. In its review of the non-audit services and fees, the audit committee considered whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG. The aggregate fees billed to us for professional accounting services by KPMG for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are respectively set forth in the table below.

	Year Ended December 31, 2019				Year Ended December 31, 2018
Audit fees	$	906,500			$	514,000
Audit-related fees	—				—
Tax fees	—				—
All other fees	10,000				10,890
Total	$	916,500			$	524,890

For purpose of the preceding table, the professional fees are classified as follows:

•

Audit fees — These are fees for professional services performed for the audit of our annual financial statements and the required review of quarterly financial statements and other procedures performed by the independent auditors in order for them to be able to form an opinion on our consolidated financial statements. These fees also cover services that are normally provided by independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and other services that generally only the independent auditor reasonably can provide, such as services associated with filing registration statements, periodic reports and other filings with the SEC, and audits of acquired properties or businesses or statutory audits for our subsidiaries or affiliates.

•

Audit-related fees — These are fees for assurance and related services that traditionally are performed by independent auditors, such as due diligence related to acquisitions and dispositions, attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation, statutory subsidiary or equity investment audits incremental to the audit of the consolidated financial statements and general assistance with the implementation of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other SEC rules promulgated pursuant to the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

•

Tax fees — These are fees for all professional services performed by professional staff, except those services related to the audit of our financial statements. These include fees for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice, including federal, state and local issues. Services may also include assistance with tax audits and appeals before the IRS and similar state and local agencies, as well as federal, state, and local tax issues related to due diligence.

•	All other fees — These are fees for other permissible work performed that do not meet the above-described categories, including a subscription to an accounting research website.

Pre-Approval Policies

The audit committee’s charter imposes a duty on the audit committee to pre-approve all auditing services performed for us by our independent auditors, as well as all permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) in order to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditors’ independence. Unless a type of service to be provided by the independent auditors has received “general” pre-approval, it will require “specific” pre-approval by the audit committee.

All requests for services to be provided by the independent auditor that do not require specific pre-approval by the audit committee will be submitted to management and must include a detailed description of the services to be rendered. Management will determine whether such services are included within the list of services that have received the general pre-approval of the audit committee. The audit committee will be informed on a timely basis of any such services rendered by the independent auditors.

79

---

Table of Contents

Requests to provide services that require specific pre-approval by the audit committee will be submitted to the audit committee by both the independent auditors and the principal financial officer, and must include a joint statement as to whether, in their view, the request is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. The chairman of the audit committee has been delegated the authority to specifically pre-approve de minimis amounts for services not covered by the general pre-approval guidelines. All amounts, including a subscription to an accounting research website, require specific pre-approval by the audit committee prior to the engagement of KPMG. All amounts specifically pre-approved by the chairman of the audit committee in accordance with this policy, are to be disclosed to the full audit committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting.

All services rendered by KPMG for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were pre-approved in accordance with the policies and procedures described above.

80

---

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report:

(a)(1) Consolidated Financial Statements:

The index of the consolidated financial statements contained herein is set forth on page F-1 hereof.

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules:

The financial statement schedules are listed in the index of the consolidated financial statements on page F-1 hereof.

No additional financial statement schedules are presented since the required information is not present or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the information required is disclosed in the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto.

(a)(3) Exhibits:

The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Annual Report.

(b) Exhibits:

See Item 15(a)(3) above.

(c) Financial Statement Schedules:

See Item 15(a)(2) above.

81

---

Table of Contents

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

OF CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT II, INC.

		Page
Consolidated Financial Statements
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018	F-3
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017	F-4
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017	F-5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017	F-6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-7
Financial Statement Schedules
	Schedule III — Real Estate Assets and Accumulated Depreciation	S-1

F-1

---

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and financial statement schedule III (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Notes 2 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019, due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 842, Leases.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

Tampa, Florida

March 27, 2020

F-2

---

Table of Contents

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT II, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

	December 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Real estate:
Land	$	343,444			$	246,790
Buildings and improvements, less accumulated depreciation of $128,304 and $84,594, respectively	2,422,102				1,426,942
Construction in progress	2,916				—
Total real estate, net	2,768,462				1,673,732
Cash and cash equivalents	69,342				68,360
Acquired intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $64,164 and $42,081, respectively	285,459				154,204
Right-of-use assets - operating leases	29,537				—
Other assets, net	86,734				67,533
Total assets	$	3,239,534			$	1,963,829
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Notes payable, net of deferred financing costs of $2,500 and $3,441, respectively	$	454,845			$	464,345
Credit facility, net of deferred financing costs of $7,385 and $2,489, respectively	900,615				352,511
Accounts payable due to affiliates	9,759				12,427
Accounts payable and other liabilities	45,354				29,555
Acquired intangible liabilities, less accumulated amortization of $12,332 and $7,592, respectively	59,538				57,606
Operating lease liabilities	31,004				—
Total liabilities	1,501,115				916,444
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding	—				—
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 510,000,000 and 500,000,000 shares authorized, respectively; 231,416,123 and 143,412,353 shares issued, respectively; 221,912,714 and 136,466,242 shares outstanding, respectively	2,219				1,364
Additional paid-in capital	1,981,848				1,192,340
Accumulated distributions in excess of earnings	(240,946		)		(152,421		)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	(4,704		)		6,100
Total stockholders’ equity	1,738,417				1,047,383
Noncontrolling interests	2				2
Total equity	1,738,419				1,047,385
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	3,239,534			$	1,963,829

---

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT II, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(in thousands, except share data and per share amounts)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019				2018				2017
Revenue:
Rental revenue	$	210,901			$	177,333			$	125,087
Expenses:
Rental expenses	40,984				37,327				26,096
General and administrative expenses	8,421				5,396				4,069
Asset management fees	16,475				13,114				9,963
Depreciation and amortization	74,104				58,258				41,133
Impairment loss on real estate	21,000				—				—
Total expenses	160,984				114,095				81,261
Gain on real estate disposition	79				—				—
Income from operations	49,996				63,238				43,826
Interest and other expense, net	47,214				34,365				22,547
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	2,782			$	28,873			$	21,279
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized (loss) income on interest rate swaps, net	$	(10,907	)		$	2,390			$	2,870
Other comprehensive (loss) income	(10,907		)		2,390				2,870
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to common stockholders	$	(8,125	)		$	31,263			$	24,149
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic	157,247,345				131,040,645				101,714,148
Diluted	157,271,668				131,064,388				101,731,944
Net income per common share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic	$	0.02			$	0.22			$	0.21
Diluted	$	0.02			$	0.22			$	0.21

---

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT II, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(in thousands, except share data)

	Common Stock
	No. of Shares			Par Value				Additional Paid-in Capital				Accumulated Distributions in Excess of Earnings				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Total Stockholders’ Equity				Noncontrolling Interests				Total Equity
Balance, December 31, 2018	136,466,242			$	1,364			$	1,192,340			$	(152,421	)		$	6,100			$	1,047,383			$	2			$	1,047,385
Cumulative effect of accounting change	—			—				—				(103		)		103				—				—				—
Issuance of common stock under the distribution reinvestment plan	4,317,245			43				39,891				—				—				39,934				—				39,934
Issuance of common stock in connection with the REIT Merger	83,676,775			837				773,173				—				—				774,010				—				774,010
Vesting of restricted stock	9,750			—				89				—				—				89				—				89
Distribution and servicing fees	—			—				563				—				—				563				—				563
Other offering costs	—			—				(578		)		—				—				(578		)		—				(578		)
Repurchase of common stock	(2,557,298	)		(25		)		(23,630		)		—				—				(23,655		)		—				(23,655		)
Issuance of noncontrolling interests	—			—				—				—				—				—				1				1
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	—			—				—				—				—				—				(1		)		(1		)
Distributions to common stockholders	—			—				—				(91,204		)		—				(91,204		)		—				(91,204		)
Other comprehensive loss	—			—				—				—				(10,907		)		(10,907		)		—				(10,907		)
Net income	—			—				—				2,782				—				2,782				—				2,782
Balance, December 31, 2019	221,912,714			$	2,219			$	1,981,848			$	(240,946	)		$	(4,704	)		$	1,738,417			$	2			$	1,738,419

	Common Stock
	No. of Shares			Par Value				Additional Paid-in Capital				Accumulated Distributions in Excess of Earnings				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income				Total Stockholders’ Equity				Noncontrolling Interests				Total Equity
Balance, December 31, 2017	124,327,777			$	1,243			$	1,084,905			$	(99,309	)		$	3,710			$	990,549			$	2			$	990,551
Issuance of common stock	12,376,366			124				118,481				—				—				118,605				—				118,605
Issuance of common stock under the distribution reinvestment plan	4,453,653			44				40,894				—				—				40,938				—				40,938
Vesting of restricted stock	9,000			—				90				—				—				90				—				90
Commissions on sale of common stock and related dealer-manager fees	—			—				(4,836		)		—				—				(4,836		)		—				(4,836		)
Distribution and servicing fees	—			—				(368		)		—				—				(368		)		—				(368		)
Other offering costs	—			—				(3,643		)		—				—				(3,643		)		—				(3,643		)
Repurchase of common stock	(4,700,554	)		(47		)		(43,183		)		—				—				(43,230		)		—				(43,230		)
Distributions to common stockholders	—			—				—				(81,985		)		—				(81,985		)		—				(81,985		)
Other comprehensive income	—			—				—				—				2,390				2,390				—				2,390
Net income	—			—				—				28,873				—				28,873				—				28,873
Balance, December 31, 2018	136,466,242			$	1,364			$	1,192,340			$	(152,421	)		$	6,100			$	1,047,383			$	2			$	1,047,385

	Common Stock
	No. of Shares			Par Value				Additional Paid-in Capital				Accumulated Distributions in Excess of Earnings				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income				Total Stockholders’ Equity				Noncontrolling Interests				Total Equity
Balance, December 31, 2016	82,744,288			$	827			$	723,859			$	(57,100	)		$	840			$	668,426			$	2			$	668,428
Issuance of common stock	39,920,746			399				385,692				—				—				386,091				—				386,091
Issuance of common stock under the distribution reinvestment plan	3,536,813			35				32,229				—				—				32,264				—				32,264
Vesting of restricted stock	6,750			—				76				—				—				76				—				76
Commissions on sale of common stock and related dealer-manager fees	—			—				(22,713		)		—				—				(22,713		)		—				(22,713		)
Distribution and servicing fees	—			—				(9,617		)		—				—				(9,617		)		—				(9,617		)
Other offering costs	—			—				(7,480		)		—				—				(7,480		)		—				(7,480		)
Repurchase of common stock	(1,880,820	)		(18		)		(17,141		)		—				—				(17,159		)		—				(17,159		)
Distributions to common stockholders	—			—				—				(63,488		)		—				(63,488		)		—				(63,488		)
Other comprehensive income	—			—				—				—				2,870				2,870				—				2,870
Net income	—			—				—				21,279				—				21,279				—				21,279
Balance, December 31, 2017	124,327,777			$	1,243			$	1,084,905			$	(99,309	)		$	3,710			$	990,549			$	2			$	990,551

---

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT II, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019				2018				2017
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	2,782			$	28,873			$	21,279
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	74,104				58,258				41,133
Amortization of deferred financing costs	2,825				2,810				2,612
Amortization of above-market leases	1,013				552				309
Amortization of below-market leases	(5,261		)		(4,832		)		(2,126		)
Reduction in the carrying amount of right-of-use assets - operating leases, net	577				—				—
Gain on real estate disposition	(79		)		—				—
Impairment loss on real estate	21,000				—				—
Straight-line rent	(14,207		)		(13,364		)		(10,596		)
Stock-based compensation	89				90				76
Ineffectiveness of interest rate swaps	—				98				(58		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts payable and other liabilities	2,214				5,151				5,385
Accounts payable due to affiliates	1,151				413				645
Other assets	(6,099		)		(3,838		)		(6,832		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	80,109				74,211				51,827
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment in real estate	(528,259		)		(217,332		)		(604,372		)
Proceeds from real estate disposition	2,882				—				—
Capital expenditures	(12,841		)		(15,583		)		(32,511		)
Real estate deposits, net	(100		)		100				190
Net cash used in investing activities	(538,318		)		(232,815		)		(636,693		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	—				118,605				386,091
Proceeds from notes payable	—				—				309,452
Payments on notes payable	(10,441		)		(349		)		(43		)
Proceeds from credit facility	605,000				155,000				240,000
Payments on credit facility	(52,000		)		(20,000		)		(240,000		)
Payments of deferred financing costs	(6,351		)		(4,958		)		(3,564		)
Repurchase of common stock	(23,655		)		(43,230		)		(17,159		)
Offering costs on issuance of common stock	(4,146		)		(12,388		)		(32,079		)
Distributions to common stockholders	(49,494		)		(40,296		)		(28,994		)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	(1		)		—				—
Net cash provided by financing activities	458,912				152,384				613,704
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	703				(6,220		)		28,838
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash - Beginning of year	79,527				85,747				56,909
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash - End of year	$	80,230			$	79,527			$	85,747
Supplemental cash flow disclosure:
Interest paid, net of interest capitalized of $142, $1,179 and $2,137, respectively	$	43,132			$	32,503			$	20,867
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions:
Common stock issued through distribution reinvestment plan	$	39,934			$	40,938			$	32,264
Equity consideration transferred in the REIT Merger	$	774,010			$	—			$	—
Net assets assumed in the REIT Merger	$	778			$	—			$	—
Issuance of noncontrolling interests	$	1			$	—			$	—
Distribution and servicing fees accrued during the period	$	—			$	—			$	7,626
Liabilities assumed at acquisition	$	—			$	—			$	6,551
Credit facility revolving loan to term loan conversion	$	30,000			$	—			$	—
Accrued capital expenditures	$	126			$	—			$	2,643
Accrued deal costs	$	139			$	—			$	—

---

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2019

Note 1—Organization and Business Operations

Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., or the Company, is a Maryland corporation that was formed on January 11, 2013. The Company elected, and currently qualifies, to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or a REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, for federal income tax purposes. Substantially all of the Company’s business is conducted through Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, or the Operating Partnership, formed on January 10, 2013. The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, and Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC, or the Advisor, is the special limited partner of the Operating Partnership.

The Company was formed to invest primarily in quality income-producing commercial real estate, with a focus on data centers and healthcare properties, preferably with long-term leases to creditworthy tenants, as well as to make other real estate-related investments in such property types, which may include equity or debt interests, including securities, in other real estate entities. As of December 31, 2019, the Company owned 152 real estate properties.

The Company raised the equity capital for its real estate investments through two public offerings, or the Offerings, from May 2014 through November 2018, and the Company has offered shares pursuant to its distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP, pursuant to two Registration Statements on Form S-3 (each, a “DRIP Offering” and together the "DRIP Offerings") since November 2017.

On April 11, 2019, the Company, along with Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc., or REIT I, the Operating Partnership, Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP, the operating partnership of REIT I, or CVOP, and Lightning Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, or Merger Sub, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, or the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, on October 4, 2019, REIT I merged with and into Merger Sub, or the REIT Merger, with Merger Sub surviving the REIT Merger, or the Surviving Entity, such that following the REIT Merger, the Surviving Entity continues as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. In accordance with the applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, the separate existence of REIT I ceased. The combined company after the REIT Merger, or the Combined Company, retained the name “Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc.” See Note 3—"Acquisitions and Dispositions" for further discussion.

Substantially all of the Company's business is managed by the Advisor. The Advisor is managed by, and is a subsidiary of, the Company's sponsor, Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC, or the Sponsor. Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC, or the Property Manager, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Sponsor, serves as the Company's property manager. The Advisor and the Property Manager received, and will continue to receive, fees during the acquisition and operational stages and the Advisor may be eligible to receive fees during the Company's liquidation stage. SC Distributors, LLC, an affiliate of the Advisor, or the Dealer Manager, served as the dealer manager of the Offerings. The Dealer Manager received fees for services related to the Offerings. The Company continues to pay the Dealer Manager a distribution and servicing fee with respect to Class T and Class T2 shares that were sold in the Offerings.

Except as the context otherwise requires, the “Company” refers to Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., the Operating Partnership and all wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Such consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto are the representation of management. These accounting policies conform to United States generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, in all material respects, and have been consistently applied in preparing the consolidated financial statements.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, and all wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are made and evaluated on an ongoing basis using information that is currently available

F-7

---

Table of Contents

as well as various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of restricted cash held in escrow and restricted bank deposits. Restricted cash held in escrow includes cash held by lenders in escrow accounts for tenant and capital improvements, repairs and maintenance and other lender reserves for certain properties, in accordance with the respective lender’s loan agreement. Restricted bank deposits consist of tenant receipts for certain properties which are required to be deposited into lender-controlled accounts in accordance with the respective lender's loan agreement. Restricted cash held in escrow and restricted bank deposits are reported in other assets, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. See Note 7—"Other Assets, Net."

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning of year and end of year cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheets to the totals shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows (amounts in thousands):

		Year Ended December 31,
Beginning of year:		2019				2018				2017
Cash and cash equivalents		68,360				74,803				50,446
Restricted cash		11,167				10,944				6,463
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		$	79,527			$	85,747			$	56,909
End of year:
Cash and cash equivalents		69,342				68,360				74,803
Restricted cash		10,888				11,167				10,944
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		$	80,230			$	79,527			$	85,747

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs are loan fees, legal fees and other third-party costs associated with obtaining financing. These costs are amortized over the terms of the respective financing agreements using the effective interest method. Unamortized deferred financing costs are generally expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity unless specific rules are met that would allow for the carryover of such costs to the refinanced debt. Costs incurred in seeking financing transactions that do not close are expensed in the period in which it is determined that the financing will not close. Deferred financing costs are recorded as a reduction of the related debt on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Deferred financing costs related to a revolving line of credit are recorded in other assets, net, on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Leasing Commission Fees

Leasing commission fees are fees incurred for the initial lease-up, leasing-up of newly constructed properties or re-leasing to existing tenants. Leasing commission fees are capitalized in other assets, net, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and amortized over the terms of the related leases.

Investment in Real Estate

Real estate costs related to the acquisition, development, construction and improvement of properties are capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred and significant replacements and betterments are capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs include all costs that do not extend the useful life of the real estate asset. The Company considers the period of future benefit of an asset in determining the appropriate useful life. Real estate assets, other than land, are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over each asset’s useful life. The Company anticipates the estimated useful lives of its assets by class as follows:

Buildings and improvements		15 – 40 years
Tenant improvements		Shorter of lease term or expected useful life
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment		3 – 10 years

Allocation of Purchase Price of Real Estate

Upon the acquisition of real properties, the Company evaluates whether the acquisition is a business combination or an asset acquisition. For both business combinations and asset acquisitions we allocate the purchase price of properties to acquired

F-8

---

Table of Contents

tangible assets, consisting of land, buildings and improvements, and acquired intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases and the value of in-place leases. For asset acquisitions, the Company capitalizes transaction costs and allocates the purchase price using a relative fair value method allocating all accumulated costs. For business combinations, the Company expenses transaction costs incurred and allocates the purchase price based on the estimated fair value of each separately identifiable asset and liability. Acquisition fees and costs associated with transactions determined to be asset acquisitions are capitalized in total real estate, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, all of the Company's acquisitions were determined to be asset acquisitions.

The fair values of the tangible assets of an acquired property (which includes land, buildings and improvements) are determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and buildings and improvements based on management’s determination of the relative fair value of these assets. Management determines the as-if-vacant fair value of a property using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers. Factors considered by management in performing these analyses include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions and other related costs. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses during the expected lease-up periods based on current market conditions.

The fair values of above-market and below-market in-place leases are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) an estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease including any fixed rate bargain renewal periods, with respect to a below-market lease. The above-market and below-market lease values are capitalized as intangible lease assets or liabilities. Above-market lease values are amortized as an adjustment of rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Below-market leases are amortized as an adjustment of rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, including any fixed rate bargain renewal periods. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts of above-market and below-market in-place lease values related to that lease would be recorded as an adjustment to rental revenue.

The fair values of in-place leases include an estimate of direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant and opportunity costs associated with lost rentals that are avoided by acquiring an in-place lease. Direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant include commissions, tenant improvements, and other direct costs and are estimated based on management’s consideration of current market costs to execute a similar lease. The value of opportunity costs is calculated using the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases over a market absorption period for a similar lease. These lease intangibles are amortized to depreciation and amortization expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts of in-place lease assets relating to that lease would be expensed.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of its real estate and related intangible assets may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the carrying value of real estate and related intangible assets may not be recoverable, the Company assesses the recoverability of the assets by estimating whether the Company will recover the carrying value of the assets through its undiscounted future cash flows and their eventual disposition. If, based on this analysis, the Company does not believe that it will be able to recover the carrying value of the assets, the Company will record an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets.

When developing estimates of expected future cash flows, the Company makes certain assumptions regarding future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease arrangements, property operating expenses, terminal capitalization and discount rates, the expected number of months it takes to re-lease the property, required tenant improvements and the number of years the property will be held for investment. The use of alternative assumptions in the future cash flow analysis could result in a different determination of the property’s future cash flows and a different conclusion regarding the existence of an impairment, the extent of such loss, if any, as well as the carrying value of the real estate and related assets.

In addition, the Company estimates the fair value of the assets by applying a market approach using comparable sales for certain properties. The use of alternative assumptions in the market approach analysis could result in a different determination of the property’s estimated fair value and a different conclusion regarding the existence of an impairment, the extent of such loss, if any, as well as the carrying value of the real estate and related assets.

F-9

---

Table of Contents

Impairment of Real Estate

During the third quarter ended September 30, 2019, real estate assets related to one healthcare property were determined to be impaired due to a tenant of the property, which was experiencing financial difficulty, vacating its space, and a second tenant indicating its desire to terminate its lease early, which the Company determined would be consistent with its strategic plans for the property. On November 8, 2019, the Company terminated the lease with the second tenant. The aggregate carrying amount of the assets of $40,266,000 exceeded their fair value. The carrying value of the property was reduced to its estimated fair value of $27,266,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $13,000,000. In addition, during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2019, real estate assets related to another healthcare property with an aggregate carrying amount of $30,412,000 were reduced to their estimated fair value of $22,412,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $8,000,000 based on a letter of intent from a prospective buyer to purchase the property. Impairment charges are recorded as impairment loss on real estate in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, no impairment losses were recorded on real estate. See Note 13—"Fair Value" for further discussion.

Impairment of Acquired Intangible Assets and Acquired Intangible Liabilities

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company wrote off a below-market lease intangible liability in the amount of approximately $212,000, by accelerating the amortization of the acquired intangible liability related to one tenant in the healthcare property discussed above.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized impairments of in-place lease intangible assets in the amount of approximately $3,195,000, by accelerating the amortization of the acquired intangible assets related to two tenants in the healthcare property discussed above.

During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, no impairment losses were recorded on acquired intangible assets or intangible liabilities. 

Fair Value

Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, or ASC 820, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is intended to be a market-based measurement, as opposed to a transaction-specific measurement.

Fair value is defined by ASC 820 as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Depending on the nature of the asset or liability, various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate the fair value. Assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from three levels of the fair value hierarchy, as follows:

Level 1—Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market is defined as a market in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2—Inputs other than quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

Level 3—Unobservable inputs, only used to the extent that observable inputs are not available, reflect the Company’s assumptions about the pricing of an asset or liability.

The following describes the methods the Company used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities:

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant receivables, prepaid and other assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities—The Company considered the carrying values of these financial instruments, assets and liabilities, to approximate fair value because of the short period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected realization.

Notes payable—Fixed Rate—The fair value is estimated by discounting the expected cash flows on notes payable at current rates at which management believes similar loans would be made considering the terms and conditions of the loan and prevailing market interest rates.

Credit facility—Fixed Rate—The fair value is estimated by discounting the expected cash flows on the fixed rate credit facility at current rates at which management believes similar borrowings would be made considering the terms and conditions of the borrowings and prevailing market interest rates.

Credit facility—Variable Rate—The fair value of the Company's variable rate credit facility is estimated based on the interest rates currently offered to the Company by financial institutions. The carrying value of the variable rate credit facility

F-10

---

Table of Contents

approximates fair value as the interest is calculated at the London Interbank Offered Rate, plus an applicable margin. The interest rate resets to market on a monthly basis.

Derivative instruments—The Company’s derivative instruments consist of interest rate swaps. These swaps are carried at fair value to comply with the provisions of ASC 820. The fair value of these instruments is determined using interest rate market pricing models. The Company incorporated credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect the Company’s nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. Considerable judgment is necessary to develop estimated fair values of financial assets and liabilities. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize, or be liable for on disposition of the financial assets and liabilities.

See additional discussion in Note 13—"Fair Value."

Revenue Recognition, Tenant Receivables and Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company recognizes non-rental related revenue in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, or ASC 606. The Company has identified its primary revenue streams as rental income from leasing arrangements and tenant reimbursements, which are outside the scope of ASC 606. The core principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Non-rental revenue, subject to ASC 606, is immaterial to the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2019, the majority of the Company's revenue is derived from rental revenue which is accounted for in accordance with ASC 842, Leases, or ASC 842. In accordance with ASC 842, minimum rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease (including rent holidays). For lease arrangements when it is not probable that the Company will collect all or substantially all of the remaining lease payments under the term of the lease, rental revenue is limited to the lesser of the rental revenue that would be recognized on a straight-line basis or the lease payments that have been collected from the lessee. Differences between rental revenue recognized and amounts contractually due under the lease agreements are credited or charged to straight-line rent receivable or straight-line rent liability, as applicable. Tenant reimbursements, which are comprised of additional amounts recoverable from tenants for common area maintenance expenses and certain other recoverable expenses, are recognized when the services are provided and the performance obligations are satisfied.

Prior to the adoption of ASC 842, tenant receivables and straight-line rent receivables were carried net of the provision for credit losses. The provision for credit losses was established for estimated losses resulting from the inability of certain tenants to meet the contractual obligations under their lease agreements. The Company’s determination of the adequacy of these provisions was based primarily upon evaluations of historical loss experience, the tenant’s financial condition, security deposits, letters of credit, lease guarantees, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. Effective January 1, 2019, upon adoption of ASC 842, the Company is no longer recording a provision for credit losses but is, instead, assessing whether or not it is probable that the Company will collect all or substantially all of the remaining lease payments under the term of the lease. When it is not probable that the Company will collect all or substantially all of the remaining lease payments under the term of the lease, rental revenue is limited to the lesser of the rental revenue that would be recognized on a straight-line basis or the lease payments that have been collected from the lessee. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded $672,000 in bad debt expenses as a reduction of rental revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Notes Receivable

Notes receivable are reported at their outstanding principal balance, net of any unearned income, unamortized deferred fees and costs and allowances for loan losses.

The Company evaluates the collectability of both interest and principal on each note receivable to determine whether it is collectible, primarily through the evaluation of credit quality indicators, such as the tenant's financial condition, collateral, evaluations of historical loss experience, current economic conditions and other relevant factors, including contractual terms of repayments. Evaluating a note receivable for potential impairment requires management to exercise judgment. The use of alternative assumptions in evaluating a note receivable could result in a different determination of the note's estimated fair value and a different conclusion regarding the existence of an impairment, the extent of such loss, if any, as well as the carrying value of the note receivable.

As part of the REIT Merger, the Company acquired one note receivable in the amount of $2,700,000. The principal balance of the Company's note receivable is secured by its collateral.

F-11

---

Table of Contents

Earnings Per Share

The Company calculates basic earnings per share by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average shares of its common stock outstanding for that period. Diluted earnings per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding and all potentially dilutive securities. Shares of non-vested restricted common stock give rise to potentially dilutive shares of common stock. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, diluted earnings per share reflected the effect of approximately 24,000, 24,000 and 18,000 of non-vested shares of restricted common stock that were outstanding as of such period, respectively.

Reportable Segments

ASC 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about an enterprise’s reportable segments. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company operated through two reportable business segments­— real estate investments in data centers and healthcare. With the continued expansion of the Company’s portfolio, segregation of the Company’s operations into two reporting segments is useful in assessing the performance of the Company’s business in the same way that management reviews performance and makes operating decisions. See Note 12—"Segment Reporting" for further discussion on the reportable segments of the Company.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

As required by ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or ASC 815, the Company records all derivative instruments at fair value as assets and liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the income or loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income during such period.

In accordance with the fair value measurement guidance Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement, the Company made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of its derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio.

The Company is exposed to variability in expected future cash flows that are attributable to interest rate changes in the normal course of business. The Company’s primary strategy in entering into derivative contracts is to add stability to future cash flows by managing its exposure to interest rate movements. The Company utilizes derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, to effectively convert some of its variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

In accordance with ASC 815, the Company designates interest rate swap contracts as cash flow hedges of floating-rate borrowings. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the gains or losses on the derivative instruments are reported as a component of other comprehensive (loss) income in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income and are reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction in the same period during which the hedged transactions affect earnings. See additional discussion in Note 14—"Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities."

Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Leases

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had cash on deposit, including restricted cash, in certain financial institutions that had deposits in excess of current federally insured levels. The Company limits its cash investments to financial institutions with high credit standings; therefore, the Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on its cash deposits. To date, the Company has not experienced a loss or lack of access to cash in its accounts.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company owned real estate investments in two micropolitan statistical areas and 67 metropolitan statistical areas, or MSA, one MSA of which accounted for 10.0% or more of rental revenue. Real estate investments located in the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, Georgia MSA accounted for 15.0% of rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had no exposure to tenant concentration that accounted for 10.0% or more of rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Share Repurchase Program

The Company’s share repurchase program allows for repurchases of shares of the Company’s common stock when certain criteria are met. The share repurchase program provides that all repurchases during any calendar year, including those redeemable upon death or a Qualifying Disability of a stockholder, are limited to those that can be funded with equivalent

F-12

---

Table of Contents

proceeds raised from the DRIP during the prior calendar year and other operating funds, if any, as the board of directors, in its sole discretion, may reserve for this purpose.

Repurchases of shares of the Company’s common stock are at the sole discretion of the Company’s board of directors, provided, however, that the Company will limit the number of shares repurchased during any calendar year to 5.0% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31^st of the previous calendar year. In addition, the Company’s board of directors, in its sole discretion, may suspend (in whole or in part) the share repurchase program at any time, and may amend, reduce, terminate or otherwise change the share repurchase program upon 30 days' prior notice to the Company’s stockholders for any reason it deems appropriate.

In connection with entering into the Merger Agreement, on April 10, 2019, the Company's board of directors approved the Sixth Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Program, or the Sixth Amended & Restated SRP, which became effective on May 11, 2019, and was applied beginning with repurchases made on the 2019 third quarter repurchase date. Under the Sixth Amended & Restated SRP, the Company only repurchased shares of common stock (Class A shares, Class I shares, Class T Shares and Class T2 shares) in connection with the death, qualifying disability, or involuntary exigent circumstance (as determined by the Company's board of directors in its sole discretion) of a stockholder, subject to certain terms and conditions specified in the Sixth Amended & Restated SRP.

In connection with the REIT Merger, on October 2, 2019, the Company's board of directors approved an amended share repurchase program, or the Amended SRP. The Amended SRP applied to all eligible stockholders, beginning with repurchases made on the first quarter repurchase date of 2020, which was January 30, 2020. For purposes of determining whether any former REIT I stockholder qualifies for participation under the Amended SRP, former REIT I stockholders received full credit for the time they held REIT I common stock prior to the closing of the REIT Merger. Subject to the terms and limitations of the Amended SRP, including, but not limited to, quarterly share limitations, an annual 5.0% share limitation, and DRIP funding limitations, the Amended SRP may be available to any stockholder as a potential means of interim liquidity. The Company will honor valid repurchase requests approximately 30 days following the end of the applicable quarter. See PART II, "Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities" for further discussion.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company repurchased 2,557,298 Class A shares, Class I shares, Class T shares and Class T2 shares of common stock (1,910,894 Class A shares, 189,947 Class I shares, 451,058 Class T shares and 5,399 Class T2 shares), or 1.87% of shares outstanding as of December 31, 2018, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $23,655,000 (an average of $9.25 per share). During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repurchased 4,700,554 Class A shares, Class I shares and Class T shares of common stock (4,117,566 Class A shares, 71,180 Class I shares and 511,808 Class T shares), or 3.80% of shares outstanding as of December 31, 2017, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $43,230,000 (an average of $9.20 per share).

Distribution Policy and Distributions Payable

In order to maintain its status as a REIT, the Company is required to make distributions each taxable year equal to at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding capital gains. To the extent funds are available, the Company intends to continue to pay regular distributions to stockholders. Distributions are paid to stockholders of record as of the applicable record dates. Distributions are payable to stockholders from legally available funds therefor. The Company declared distributions per share of common stock in the amounts of $0.58, $0.63 and $0.62 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had distributions payable of approximately $9,093,000. Of these distributions payable, approximately $6,446,000 was paid in cash and approximately $2,647,000 was reinvested in shares of common stock pursuant to the DRIP on January 2, 2020. Distributions to stockholders are determined by the board of directors of the Company and are dependent upon a number of factors, including funds available for the payment of distributions, financial condition, the timing of property acquisitions, capital expenditure requirements, and annual distribution requirements in order to maintain the Company’s status as a REIT under the Code. See Note 21—"Subsequent Events" for further discussion.

Income Taxes

The Company currently qualifies and is taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code. Accordingly, it will generally not be subject to corporate U.S. federal or state income tax to the extent that it makes qualifying distributions to stockholders, and provided it satisfies, on a continuing basis, through actual investment and operating results, the REIT requirements, including certain asset, income, distribution and stock ownership tests. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT, and does not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, it would be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes and may be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the subsequent four taxable years following the year in which it lost its REIT qualification, unless the Internal Revenue Service grants the Company relief under certain statutory provisions. Accordingly, failure to qualify as a REIT could have a material adverse impact on the results of operations and amounts available for distribution to stockholders.

F-13

---

Table of Contents

The dividends paid deduction of a REIT for qualifying dividends paid to its stockholders is computed using the Company’s taxable income as opposed to net income reported in the consolidated financial statements. Taxable income, generally, will differ from net income reported in the consolidated financial statements because the determination of taxable income is based on tax provisions and not financial accounting principles.

The Company has concluded that there was no impact related to uncertain tax positions from results of operations of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. The United States of America is the jurisdiction for the Company, and the earliest tax year subject to examination is 2016.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Leases

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB established ASC 842, by issuing ASU 2016-02, Leases, which replaces the guidance previously outlined in ASC 840, Leases. The new standard increases transparency by requiring the recognition by lessees of right-of-use, or ROU, assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months, regardless of lease classification. Under the standard, disclosures are required to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.

Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASC 842, using the modified retrospective approach. Consequently, financial information is not updated, and the disclosures required under the new standard are not provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019. Further, the Company reduces the ROU assets and operating lease liabilities over the remaining lease term and presents the reduction of ROU assets - operating leases and accretion of operating lease liabilities as a single line item within operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company elected the package of practical expedients, which permits it to not reassess (1) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (2) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and (3) any initial direct costs for any existing leases as of the effective date. The Company did not elect the hindsight practical expedient, which permits entities to use hindsight in determining the lease term and assessing impairment.

Lessor

As a lessor, the Company's recognition of rental revenue remained unchanged, except for the accounting for initial direct costs related to lease negotiations. Effective January 1, 2019, indirect leasing costs, such as legal costs related to lease negotiations no longer meet the definition of capitalized initial direct costs under ASC 842 and are recorded in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income, and are no longer capitalized.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Targeted Improvements, to simplify the guidance, that allows lessors to combine non-lease components with the related lease components if both the timing and pattern of transfer are the same for the non-lease component and related lease component, and the lease component would be classified as an operating lease. The single combined component is accounted for under ASC 842 if the lease component is the predominant component and is accounted for under ASC 606, if the non-lease components are the predominant components. Lessors are permitted to apply the practical expedient to all existing leases on a retrospective or prospective basis. The Company elected the practical expedient to combine its lease and non-lease components that meet the defined criteria and is accounting for the combined lease components under ASC 842. As a result, the Company is no longer presenting rental revenue and tenant reimbursements related to common area maintenance and other expense recoveries separately in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

In December 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-20, Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors, that allows lessors to make an accounting policy election not to evaluate whether real estate taxes and other similar taxes imposed by a governmental authority on a specific lease revenue-producing transaction are the primary obligation of the lessor as owner of the underlying leased asset. A lessor that makes this election excludes these taxes from the measurement of lease revenue and the associated expense. ASU 2018-20 also requires lessors to (1) exclude lessor costs paid directly by lessees to third parties on the lessor’s behalf from variable payments and, therefore, variable lease revenue and (2) include lessor costs that are paid by the lessor and reimbursed by the lessee in the measurement of variable lease revenue and the associated expense. The Company adopted ASU 2018-20 effective January 1, 2019. The adoption of this standard resulted in a decrease of approximately $1,593,000 during the year ended December 31, 2019, in rental revenue and rental expense, as the aforementioned real estate tax payments are paid by a lessee directly to a third party, and, therefore, are no longer presented on a gross basis in the Company's consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income. The adoption of this standard had no impact on the Company's net income attributable to common stockholders.

Lessee

The Company is a lessee on 17 ground leases, of which four do not have corresponding operating lease liabilities because the Company did not have future payment obligations at the acquisition of these leases. The Company recognized a ROU asset

F-14

---

Table of Contents

and operating lease liability for the other 13 ground leases on the Company's consolidated balance sheet due to the adoption of ASC 842. See Note 6—"Leases" for further discussion.

Derivatives and Hedging

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, or ASU 2017-12. The objectives of ASU 2017-12 are to (i) improve the transparency and understandability of information conveyed to financial statement users about an entity’s risk management activities by better aligning the entity’s financial reporting for hedging relationships with those risk management activities and (ii) reduce the complexity of and simplify the application of hedge accounting by preparers. On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2017-12. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2017-12, the cumulative ineffectiveness gain of $103,000 previously recognized on existing cash flow hedges was reclassified to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from accumulated distributions in excess of earnings.

In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes, or ASU 2018-16. ASU 2018-16 permits the use of the OIS rate based on SOFR as a United States benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815. ASU 2018-16 was effective upon adoption of ASU 2017-12. The Company adopted ASU 2018-16 on January 1, 2019, and its provisions did not have an impact on its consolidated financial statements; however, the provisions may impact existing agreements, new contracts and transactions not yet contemplated, in the future. The Company is not able to predict when the current London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, will cease to be available or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR markets.

Disclosure Update and Simplification

In July 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-07, Codification Updates to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Final Rule Releases No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification, and Nos. 33-10231 and 33-10442, Investment Company Reporting Modernization, and Miscellaneous Updates, or ASU 2019-07. ASU 2019-07 clarifies or improves the disclosure and presentation requirements of a variety of codification topics by aligning them with the SEC's regulations, thereby eliminating redundancies and making the codification easier to apply. ASU 2019-07 was effective upon issuance and did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

Fair Value Measurement

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, or ASU 2018-13. ASU 2018-13 removes certain disclosure requirements, including the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the policy for timing of transfers between the levels and the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 also adds certain disclosure requirements, including the requirement to disclose the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate ASU 2018-13 to have a material impact to the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation, primarily related to the recently adopted accounting pronouncements discussed within this note. Amounts previously disclosed as rental and parking revenue and tenant reimbursements during the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017, are now included in rental revenue and will no longer be presented separately on the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

F-15

---

Table of Contents

Note 3—Acquisitions and Dispositions

2019 Acquisitions

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company purchased 67 real estate properties, or the 2019 Acquisitions, including 60 properties acquired in the REIT Merger, all of which were determined to be asset acquisitions. Upon the completion of each 2019 acquisition, the Company allocated the purchase price of the real estate properties to acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, buildings and improvements, tenant improvements, acquired intangible assets and acquired intangible liabilities, based on the relative fair value method of allocating all accumulated costs.

The following table summarizes the consideration transferred for the 2019 Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2019:

Property Description		Date Acquired		Ownership Percentage		Purchase Price (amounts in thousands)
Bryant Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Bryant Healthcare Facility		8/16/2019		100%		$	4,408
TAM Healthcare Facilities (1)		9/19/2019		100%		65,443
REIT Merger (2)		10/04/2019		100%		1,229,365
Tucson Healthcare Facility II (3)		12/26/2019		100%		651
Tucson Healthcare Facility III (4)		12/27/2019		100%		1,763
Total						$	1,301,630

(1)	The TAM Healthcare Facilities consists of four properties. Upon acquisition of the TAM Healthcare Facilities, the Company entered into four ground lease agreements. See further discussion in Note 6—"Leases."

(2)	The REIT Merger consists of 60 healthcare properties. See further discussion below.

(3)

The Tucson Healthcare Facility II was acquired as a development healthcare property. The purchase price was recorded as a ground leasehold asset in the amount of $651,000. Upon acquisition of the Tucson Healthcare Facility II, the Company entered into a ground lease agreement. See further discussion in Note 6—"Leases". At the closing date, the Company funded $1,764,000 for the construction of the development property.

(4)	The Tucson Healthcare Facility III was acquired as a development healthcare property and the purchase price was recorded as land in the amount of $1,763,000. At the closing date, the Company funded $1,152,000 for the construction of the development property.

The following table summarizes the Company's purchase price allocation of the 2019 Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2019 (amounts in thousands):

		Total
Land		$	98,723
Buildings and improvements		1,047,755
In-place leases		141,407
Tenant improvements		5,349
Ground leasehold assets (1)		3,731
Above-market leases		17,906
Total assets acquired		$	1,314,871
Ground lease liabilities (1)		(6,048		)
Below-market leases		(7,193		)
Total liabilities acquired		(13,241		)
Net assets acquired		$	1,301,630

(1)	Represents a component of the ROU assets- operating leases.

Acquisition fees and costs associated with transactions determined to be asset acquisitions are capitalized. The Company capitalized acquisition fees and costs of approximately $30,546,000 related to the 2019 Acquisitions during the years ended December 31, 2019, which are included in the Company's allocation of the real estate acquisitions presented above. The total amount of all acquisition fees and costs is limited to 6.0% of the contract purchase price of a property, unless the Company’s

F-16

---

Table of Contents

board of directors determines a higher transaction fee to be commercially competitive, fair and reasonable to the Company. The contract purchase price is the amount actually paid or allocated in respect of the purchase, development, construction or improvement of a property exclusive of acquisition fees and costs. During the year ended December 31, 2019, acquisition fees and costs did not exceed 6.0% of the contract purchase price of the 2019 Acquisitions during such period.

Completion of REIT Merger

On October 4, 2019, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, REIT I merged with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub surviving the REIT Merger, such that following the REIT Merger, the Surviving Entity continued as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. In accordance with the applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, the separate existence of REIT I ceased. The Combined Company retained the name “Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc.”

At the effective time of the REIT Merger, each issued and outstanding share of REIT I’s common stock (or a fraction thereof), $0.01 par value per share, or the REIT I Common Stock, was converted into the right to receive:

(i)	$1.00 in cash; and

(ii)	0.4681 shares of the Company's Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, or the REIT II Class A Common Stock.

The following summarizes the consideration transferred for the REIT I stockholders for the REIT Merger on October 4, 2019, exclusive of acquisition fees and costs and the payoff of REIT I debt (amounts in thousands):

		Total Consideration
Value of Company's Class A common stock issued to REIT I stockholders (1)		$	774,010
Cash consideration paid		178,758
Total consideration transferred		$	952,768

(1) The Company issued 83,676,775 shares of its Class A common stock to REIT I stockholders.

2019 Disposition

On November 26, 2019, the Company sold one of three buildings and a portion of land related to one healthcare property for an aggregate sale price of $3,106,000 and generated net proceeds of $2,882,000. The Company recognized an aggregate gain on sale of $79,000, in gain on real estate disposition on the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Note 4—Acquired Intangible Assets, Net

Acquired intangible assets, net, consisted of the following as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands, except weighted average life amounts):

	December 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
In-place leases, net of accumulated amortization of $62,252 and $41,143, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 10.4 years and 10.1 years, respectively)	$	266,856			$	151,135
Above-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $1,912 and $899, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 10.5 years and 5.1 years, respectively)	18,603				1,710
Ground leasehold assets, net of accumulated amortization of $0 and $39, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 0.0 years and 83.5 years, respectively)	—			(1)	1,359
	$	285,459			$	154,204

(1)	On January 1, 2019, as part of the adoption of ASC 842, as discussed in Note 2—"Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements," the Company reclassified the ground leasehold assets balance from acquired intangible assets, net, to right-of-use assets - operating leases within the consolidated balance sheet.

The aggregate weighted average remaining life of the acquired intangible assets was 10.4 years and 10.6 years as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

F-17

---

Table of Contents

Amortization of the acquired intangible assets was $26,699,000, $19,919,000 and $14,167,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Of the $26,699,000 recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019, $3,195,000 was attributable to accelerated amortization due to the impairment of two in-place lease intangible assets. Amortization of the in-place leases is included in depreciation and amortization and the above-market leases are recorded as an adjustment to rental revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Estimated amortization expense on the acquired intangible assets as of December 31, 2019, for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year		Amount
2020		$	33,211
2021		32,409
2022		30,071
2023		28,094
2024		26,019
Thereafter		135,655
		$	285,459

Note 5—Acquired Intangible Liabilities, Net

Acquired intangible liabilities, net, consisted of the following as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands, except weighted average life amounts):

	December 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
Below-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $12,332 and $7,592, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 16.1 years and 17.6 years, respectively)	$	59,538			$	57,606

Amortization of the below-market leases was $5,261,000, $4,832,000 and $2,126,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Of the $5,261,000 recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019, $212,000 was attributable to accelerated amortization of a below-market lease intangible liability. Amortization of below-market leases is recorded as an adjustment to rental revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Estimated amortization of the acquired intangible liabilities as of December 31, 2019, for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year		Amount
2020		$	5,486
2021		5,458
2022		4,394
2023		3,779
2024		3,677
Thereafter		36,744
		$	59,538

F-18

---

Table of Contents

Note 6—Leases

Lessor

Rental Revenue

The Company’s real estate properties are leased to tenants under operating leases with varying terms. Typically, the leases have provisions to extend the terms of the lease agreements. The Company retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the real estate properties leased to tenants.

Future minimum rent to be received from the Company's investments in real estate assets under the terms of non-cancelable operating leases in effect as of December 31, 2019, including optional renewal periods, for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year		Amount
2020		$	224,837
2021		231,052
2022		235,334
2023		234,949
2024		230,179
Thereafter		1,619,494
		$	2,775,845

Lessee

Rental Expense

The Company has 17 ground leases, for which four do not have corresponding operating lease liabilities because the Company did not have future payment obligations at the acquisition of these leases. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into or assumed 11 ground lease agreements, including six ground lease agreements acquired as a part of the REIT Merger, for an aggregate present value of future rent payments of $22,265,000. The ground lease obligations generally require fixed annual rental payments and may also include escalation clauses. The weighted average remaining lease term for the Company's operating leases was 50.7 years and 27.2 years as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

The Company's ground leases do not provide an implicit interest rate. In order to calculate the present value of the remaining ground lease payments, the Company used incremental borrowing rates, or IBR, adjusted for a number of factors. The determination of an appropriate IBR involves multiple inputs and judgments. The Company determined its IBR considering the general economic environment, the Company's credit rating and various financing and asset specific adjustments to ensure the IBR is appropriate for the intended use of the underlying ground lease. As a result, the weighted average adjusted incremental borrowing rates ranged between 5.0% and 6.6%.

The future minimum rent payments, discounted by the Company's adjusted incremental borrowing rates, under non-cancelable ground leases, as of December 31, 2019, for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year		Amount
2020		$	1,633
2021		1,634
2022		1,634
2023		1,638
2024		1,687
Thereafter		136,719
Total undiscounted rental payments		144,945
Less imputed interest		(113,941		)
Total operating lease liabilities		$	31,004

Due to the adoption of the of ASC 842, the Company reclassified ground leasehold assets as of January 1, 2019, from acquired intangible assets and liabilities, to right-of-use assets - operating leases within the consolidated balance sheet.

F-19

---

Table of Contents

As discussed in Note 2—"Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," the Company adopted ASC 842, effective January 1, 2019, and consequently, financial information was not updated, and the disclosures required under the new lease standard are not provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019.

The following represents approximate future minimum rent payments under non-cancelable ground leases by year as of December 31, 2018, and for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year		Amount
2019		$	123
2020		123
2021		123
2022		123
2023		123
Thereafter		2,246
Total undiscounted rental payments		$	2,861

This table excludes future minimum rent payments from one tenant that pays the ground lease obligations directly to the lessor, consistent with the Company's accounting policy prior to its adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019.

Note 7—Other Assets, Net

Other assets, net, consisted of the following as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands):

	December 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
Deferred financing costs, related to the revolver portion of the credit facility, net of accumulated amortization of $5,696 and $4,686, respectively	$	2,623			$	3,053
Leasing commissions, net of accumulated amortization of $240 and $82, respectively	10,288				5,006
Restricted cash	10,888				11,167
Tenant receivables	7,750				6,080
Note receivable	2,700				—
Straight-line rent receivable	46,892				32,685
Prepaid and other assets	4,709				3,338
Derivative assets	884				6,204
	$	86,734			$	67,533

Amortization of deferred financing costs related to the revolver portion of the credit facility for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $1,010,000, $1,260,000 and $1,637,000, respectively, which was recorded as interest and other expense, net, in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income. Amortization of leasing commissions for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $158,000, $76,000 and $6,000, respectively, which was recorded as depreciation and amortization in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

F-20

---

Table of Contents

Note 8—Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities

Accounts payable and other liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (amounts in thousands):

	December 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	11,448			$	9,188
Accrued interest expense	5,185				3,219
Accrued property taxes	3,537				2,309
Distributions payable to stockholders	9,093				7,317
Tenant deposits	1,500				875
Deferred rental income	9,003				6,647
Derivative liabilities	5,588				—
	$	45,354			$	29,555

Note 9—Notes Payable

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $457,345,000 principal outstanding in notes payable collateralized by real estate properties with a weighted average interest rate of 4.4%.

The following table summarizes the notes payable balances as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands):

									Interest Rates
	December 31, 2019				December 31, 2018				Range				Weighted Average		Maturity Date
Fixed rate notes payable	$	219,567			$	220,351			4.0%	-	4.8%		4.3%		12/11/2021	-	7/1/2027
Variable rate notes payable fixed through interest rate swaps	237,778				247,435				3.7%	-	5.1%		4.5%		10/28/2021	-	11/16/2022
Total notes payable, principal amount outstanding	457,345				467,786
Unamortized deferred financing costs related to notes payable	(2,500		)		(3,441		)
Total notes payable, net of deferred financing costs	$	454,845			$	464,345

The Company did not enter into any notes payable during the year ended December 31, 2019.

On December 10, 2019, the Company made a partial pre-payment of $8,500,000 on its debt in connection with one of the Company's notes payable, with an outstanding principal balance of $30,266,000 at the time of repayment, in order to comply with certain requirements of the loan agreement.

The principal payments due on the notes payable as of December 31, 2019, for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year		Amount
2020		$	3,925
2021		146,025
2022		166,209
2023		2,710
2024		27,360
Thereafter		111,116
		$	457,345

F-21

---

Table of Contents

Note 10—Credit Facility

The Company's outstanding credit facility as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following (amounts in thousands):

	December 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
Variable rate revolving line of credit	$	108,000			$	105,000
Variable rate term loan fixed through interest rate swaps	250,000				100,000
Variable rate term loans	550,000				150,000
Total credit facility, principal amount outstanding	908,000				355,000
Unamortized deferred financing costs related to the term loan credit facility	(7,385		)		(2,489		)
Total credit facility, net of deferred financing costs	$	900,615			$	352,511

Significant activities regarding the credit facility during the year ended December 31, 2019 and subsequent include:

•	The Company drew $605,000,000 on its credit facility for 2019 acquisitions and the REIT Merger, to fund share repurchases and repaid $52,000,000 on its credit facility.

•	The Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements, with an effective date of April 1, 2019, which effectively fixed LIBOR related to $150,000,000 of the term loans of its credit facility, and three interest rate swap agreements with an effective date of January 1, 2020, which will effectively fix LIBOR related to $150,000,000 of the term loans of its credit facility.

•	On January 29, 2019, the Company amended its credit facility agreement by adding beneficial ownership provisions, modifying certain definitions related to change of control and consolidated total secured debt, and clarified certain covenants related to restrictions on indebtedness and restrictions on liens.

•

On April 11, 2019, the Operating Partnership, the Company and certain of the Operating Partnership’s subsidiaries entered into the Consent and Second Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which (i) increased the amount of Secured Debt that is Recourse Indebtedness from 15% to 17.5% for four full consecutive fiscal quarters immediately following the date on which the REIT Merger was consummated and one partial fiscal quarter (to include the quarter in which the REIT Merger was consummated), (ii) allowed, after April 27, 2019, the Operating Partnership, the Company, Merger Sub and CVOP to incur, assume or guarantee indebtedness as permitted under the Company's credit facility and with respect to which there is a lien on any equity interests of such entity, and (iii) from and after the consummation of the REIT Merger, allowed Merger Sub and CVOP to be additional guarantors to the Company's credit facility.

•	On April 11, 2019, in connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, the Operating Partnership entered into a commitment letter to obtain a senior secured bridge facility, or the Bridge Facility, in an amount of $475,000,000. Upon the closing of the Term Loan (defined below), on August 7, 2019, the Company terminated its Bridge Facility.

•	On April 29, 2019, KeyBank National Association, or KeyBank, and the Operating Partnership entered into the Release of Collateral Assignment of Interests, whereby KeyBank released its lien and security interest in the mortgaged properties. Therefore, effective April 29, 2019, the Company's credit facility is unsecured.

•

On August 7, 2019, in anticipation of the REIT Merger, the Company and certain of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, or the A&R Credit Agreement, with KeyBank, as Administrative Agent for the lenders, to amend the borrower from the Operating Partnership to the Company. The A&R Credit Agreement increased the maximum commitments available under the Company's credit facility from $700,000,000 to an aggregate of up to $780,000,000, consisting of a $500,000,000 revolving line of credit, with a maturity date of April 27, 2022, subject to the Company's right to one, 12-month extension period, and a $280,000,000 term loan, with a maturity date of April 27, 2023.

•	On August 7, 2019, as a result of entering into the A&R Credit Agreement, the Company converted $30,000,000 of its variable rate revolving line of credit under its credit facility to a variable rate term loan under its credit facility.

•

Simultaneously with the A&R Credit Agreement’s execution, on August 7, 2019, the Company and certain of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into the Senior Unsecured Term Loan Agreement, or the Term Loan, with KeyBank, as Administrative Agent for the lenders, for the maximum commitment available of up to $520,000,000 with a maturity date of December 31, 2024. The Term Loan is pari passu with the A&R Credit Agreement. The Term Loan was funded upon the consummation of the REIT Merger on October 4, 2019. The Company used proceeds from the Term Loan to payoff REIT I's outstanding debt in the amount of $248,580,000, to fund the $178,758,000 in cash consideration paid to REIT I stockholders, to pay acquisition fees and costs in the amount of $27,350,000 and to pay down the Company's revolver portion of the credit facility in the amount of $52,000,000 at the time of closing of the

F-22

---

Table of Contents

REIT Merger.

•

In connection with the REIT Merger, on October 3, 2019, the Operating Partnership, the Company, certain of the Company's subsidiaries, and KeyBank entered into the First Amendment to the A&R Credit Agreement and the First Amendment to the Term Loan (together, the "First Amendments to the Unsecured Credit Facility"). The First Amendments to the Unsecured Credit Facility allow for the Contributions (as defined in Note 11—"Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements") by amending and adding certain language in the A&R Credit Agreement and Senior Unsecured Term Loan Agreement in order to conform to the contemplated organizational structure following the REIT Merger.

•	Subsequent to December 31, 2019, the Company drew $95,000,000 on its credit facility, $20,000,000 of which was related to a property acquisition (discussed in Note 21—"Subsequent Events") and to fund share repurchases, and $75,000,000 was drawn to provide additional liquidity due to the uncertainty in overall economic conditions created by the coronavirus outbreak.

The principal payments due on the credit facility as of December 31, 2019, for each of the next five years ending December 31, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year		Amount
2020		$	—
2021		—
2022		108,000
2023		280,000
2024		520,000
		$	908,000

The proceeds of loans made under the credit facility may be used to finance the acquisitions of real estate investments, for tenant improvements and leasing commissions with respect to real estate, for repayment of indebtedness, for capital expenditures with respect to real estate, and for general corporate and working capital purposes. The credit facility can be increased to $1,600,000,000, subject to certain conditions.

The annual interest rate payable under the credit facility is, at the Company's option, either: (a) LIBOR, plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.75% to 2.25%, which is determined based on the Company's overall leverage, or (b) a base rate which means, for any day, a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the prime rate for such day plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.75% to 1.25%, which is determined based on the Company's overall leverage. As of December 31, 2019, the weighted average interest rate on the variable rate portion of the credit facility was 3.9% and the weighted average interest rate on the variable rate fixed through interest rate swap portion of the credit facility was 4.2%.

In addition to interest, the Company is required to pay a fee on the unused portion of the lenders’ commitments under the A&R Credit Agreement at a per annum rate equal to 0.25% if the daily amount outstanding under the A&R Credit Agreement is less than 50% of the lenders’ commitments, or 0.15% if the daily amount outstanding under the A&R Credit Agreement is greater than or equal to 50% of the lenders’ commitments. The unused fee is payable quarterly in arrears.

The actual amount of credit available under the credit facility is a function of certain loan-to-cost, loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios contained in the credit facility agreements. The amount of credit available under the credit facility will be a maximum principal amount of the value of the assets that are included in the pool availability.

The credit facility agreements contain various affirmative and negative covenants that are customary for credit facilities and transactions of this type, including limitations on the incurrence of debt by the Company, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries that own properties that serve as collateral for the credit facility, limitations on the nature of the Company's business, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, and limitations on distributions by the Company, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. The credit facility agreements impose the following financial covenants, which are specifically defined in the credit facility agreements, on the Company: (a) maximum ratio of indebtedness to gross asset value; (b) minimum ratio of adjusted consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization to consolidated fixed charges; (c) minimum tangible net worth; (d) minimum liquidity thresholds; (e) minimum weighted average remaining lease term of properties in the collateral pool; and (f) minimum number of properties in the collateral pool. In addition, the credit facility agreements include events of default that are customary for credit facilities and transactions of this type.

F-23

---

Table of Contents

Note 11—Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements

The Company has no direct employees. Substantially all of the Company's business is managed by the Advisor. The employees of the Advisor and other affiliates provide services to the Company related to acquisitions, property management, asset management, accounting, investor relations, and all other administrative services.

Amendments to CVREIT II Advisory Agreement

On April 11, 2019, concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, the Company, CVOP, the Operating Partnership and the Advisor entered into the Third Amended and Restated CVREIT II Advisory Agreement, or the Third A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement, which became effective as of the effective time of the REIT Merger.

First Amendment to Third A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement

On October 3, 2019, the Company, CVOP, the Operating Partnership and the Advisor entered into the First Amendment to the Third A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement, or the First Amendment, which became effective on October 4, 2019, simultaneously with the effectiveness of the Third A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement at the effective time of the REIT Merger. The purpose of the First Amendment was to clarify that any subordinated fees payable to the Advisor under the Third A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement will be offset by any distributions the Advisor or any of its affiliates receives as a special limited partner of the Operating Partnership or CVOP.

Fourth A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement

Following the completion of the Contributions (as defined herein), on October 4, 2019, the Company, the Operating Partnership and the Advisor entered into the Fourth Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement, or the Fourth A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement, in order to, among other things, clarify that CVOP will not be a party to the Fourth A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement and that any subordinated fees the Advisor would have received under the Third A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement would be made to the Advisor in its capacity as a special limited partner of the Operating Partnership pursuant to the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement (as defined herein).

Amendments to CVOP II Operating Partnership Agreement

Fifth Amendment to CVOP II Operating Partnership Agreement

Concurrent with the execution of the Merger Agreement, the Company entered into an amendment, or the Fifth Amendment, to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership, by and between the Company and the Advisor, as amended, or the CVOP II Partnership Agreement. The purpose of the Fifth Amendment was to revise the economic interests of the Advisor by providing that the Advisor would not receive any subordinated distributions as a special limited partner of the Operating Partnership. The Fifth Amendment was to become effective as of the effective time of the REIT Merger.

Sixth Amendment to CVOP II Operating Partnership Agreement

On October 3, 2019, the Company and the Advisor entered into the Sixth Amendment to CVOP II Partnership Agreement, or the Sixth Amendment. The purpose of the Sixth Amendment is to rescind the Fifth Amendment in its entirety such that the revisions to the CVOP II Partnership Agreement set forth in the Fifth Amendment did not go into effect.

A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement

Following the completion of the Contributions (as defined herein), on October 4, 2019, the Company and the Advisor entered into the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, or the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement. The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement amends and restates the CVOP II Partnership Agreement in order to, among other things, amend the provisions related to distributions payable to the Advisor upon a Listing (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement), termination of the Fourth A&R Advisory Agreement (unless such termination is by the Company because of a material breach of the Fourth A&R Advisory Agreement or occurs upon a change of control), and upon an Investment Liquidity Event (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement). The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement also increases the threshold of the Priority Return (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement) from 6.0% to 8.0%, as previously agreed to and disclosed in connection with the REIT Merger.

Omnibus Assignment and Amendment to Property Management and Leasing Agreements

On October 4, 2019, immediately prior to the effective time of the REIT Merger, pursuant to the Omnibus Assignment and Amendment to the Property Management and Leasing Agreements, or the Assignment Amendment, the Property Manager, as assignee, or the Assignee, acquired, and Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services, LLC, as assignor, or the Assignor, assigned, transferred, conveyed, and delivered to the Assignee, all of the Assignor's rights, titles, and interests in the Property Management and Leasing Agreements by and among the Assignor and CVOP's wholly-owned subsidiaries. Therefore, the

F-24

---

Table of Contents

Assignee, the property manager for the Company, will act as the property manager and leasing agent for the properties the Company acquired in the REIT Merger.

Operating Partnership Contribution

On October 4, 2019, following completion of the REIT Merger, the Advisor purchased all of Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC's, or CVREIT Advisor, units of ownership interest in CVOP, or OP Units, and all of CVREIT Advisor's rights and entitlements as a partner of CVOP, or the CVREIT II Advisor OP Unit Purchase, for an aggregate purchase price of $1,066, pursuant to that certain Partnership Interest Purchase Agreement, or the Purchase Agreement, by and between the Advisor, as buyer, and CVREIT Advisor, as Seller, dated October 4, 2019. On October 4, 2019, CVOP, the Company, the Operating Partnership, the Advisor, Merger Sub, and CVOP Partner, LLC, or CVOP Partner, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, entered into a contribution agreement, or the Contribution Agreement, whereby effective on October 4, 2019, following the CVREIT II Advisor OP Unit Purchase, (i) Merger Sub and the Advisor, each a Contributor, and together, the Contributors, each contributed to the Operating Partnership all of their interests in CVOP and the Operating Partnership acquired from the Contributors all of the Contributors’ right, title and interest in CVOP in exchange for limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership, and (ii) the Operating Partnership contributed to CVOP Partner all of its limited OP Units, or collectively, the Contributions.

Amended and Restated CVOP Partnership Agreement

Following the completion of the Contributions, on October 4, 2019, the Operating Partnership, as the general partner of CVOP, and CVOP Partner, as the limited partner of CVOP, entered into the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of CVOP, or the A&R CVOP Partnership Agreement. The primary purpose of the A&R CVOP Partnership Agreement is to provide for the allocation of CVOP’s profits and losses and distributions of cash and other assets of CVOP to the Operating Partnership as general partner and CVOP Partner as limited partner of CVOP.

Distribution and Servicing Fees

Through the termination of the Offering on November 27, 2018, the Company paid the Dealer Manager selling commissions and dealer manager fees in connection with the sale of shares of certain classes of common stock. The Company continues to pay the Dealer Manager a distribution and servicing fee with respect to its Class T and Class T2 shares of common stock that were sold in the Initial Offering (primary Offering only) and the Offering. Distribution and servicing fees are recorded in the accompanying consolidated statements of stockholders' equity as a reduction to equity as incurred.

Acquisition Fees and Expenses

The Company pays to the Advisor 2.0% of the contract purchase price of each property or asset acquired. In addition, the Company reimburses the Advisor for acquisition expenses incurred in connection with the selection and acquisition of properties or real estate-related investments (including expenses relating to potential investments that the Company does not close), such as legal fees and expenses, costs of real estate due diligence, appraisals, non-refundable option payments on properties not acquired, travel and communications expenses, accounting fees and expenses and title insurance premiums, whether or not the property was acquired. Since the Company's formation through December 31, 2019, the Company reimbursed the Advisor expenses of approximately 0.01% of the aggregate purchase price all of properties acquired. Acquisition fees and expenses associated with the acquisition of properties determined to be business combinations are expensed as incurred, including investment transactions that are no longer under consideration. Acquisition fees and expenses associated with transactions determined to be asset acquisitions are capitalized in total real estate, net, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Asset Management Fees

The Company pays to the Advisor an asset management fee calculated on a monthly basis in an amount equal to 1/12th of 0.75% of aggregate asset value, which is payable monthly, in arrears.

Operating Expense Reimbursement

The Company reimburses the Advisor for all operating expenses it paid or incurred in connection with the services provided to the Company, subject to certain limitations. Expenses in excess of the operating expenses in the four immediately preceding quarters that exceed the greater of (a) 2% of average invested assets or (b) 25% of net income, subject to certain adjustments, will not be reimbursed unless the independent directors determine such excess expenses are justified. The Company will not reimburse the Advisor for personnel costs in connection with services for which the Advisor receives an acquisition fee or a disposition fee. Operating expenses incurred on the Company’s behalf are recorded in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

F-25

---

Table of Contents

Property Management Fees

In connection with the rental, leasing, operation and management of the Company’s properties, the Company pays the Property Manager, and its affiliates, aggregate fees equal to 3.0% of gross revenues from the properties managed, or property management fees. The Company reimburses the Property Manager and its affiliates for property-level expenses that any of them pay or incur on the Company’s behalf, including certain salaries, bonuses and benefits of persons employed by the Property Manager and its affiliates, except for the salaries, bonuses and benefits of persons who also serve as one of its executive officers. The Property Manager and its affiliates may subcontract the performance of their duties to third parties and pay all or a portion of the property management fee to the third parties with whom they contract for these services. If the Company contracts directly with third parties for such services, it will pay them customary market fees and may pay the Property Manager an oversight fee equal to 1.0% of the gross revenues of the properties managed. In no event will the Company pay the Property Manager or any affiliate both a property management fee and an oversight fee with respect to any particular property. Property management fees are recorded in rental expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Leasing Commission Fees

The Company pays the Property Manager a separate fee for the initial lease-up, leasing-up of newly constructed properties or re-leasing to existing tenants. Leasing commission fees are capitalized in other assets, net, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and amortized over the terms of the related leases.

Construction Management Fees

For acting as general contractor and/or construction manager to supervise or coordinate projects or to provide major repairs or rehabilitation on the Company's properties, the Company may pay the Property Manager up to 5.0% of the cost of the projects, repairs and/or rehabilitation, as applicable, or construction management fees. Construction management fees are capitalized in real estate, net, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Disposition Fees

The Company pays its Advisor, or its affiliates, if it provides a substantial amount of services (as determined by a majority of the Company’s independent directors) in connection with the sale of properties, a disposition fee, equal to the lesser of 1.0% of the contract sales price or one-half of the total brokerage commission paid if a third party broker is also involved, without exceeding the lesser of 6.0% of the contract sales price or a reasonable, customary and competitive real estate commission. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had not incurred any disposition fees to the Advisor or its affiliates.

Subordinated Participation in Net Sale Proceeds

Prior to the completion of the REIT Merger on October 4, 2019, upon the sale of the Company, the Advisor would have received 15% of the remaining net sale proceeds after return of capital contributions plus payment to investors of a 6.0% annual cumulative, non-compounded return on the capital contributed by investors, or the subordinated participation in net sale proceeds. As of October 4, 2019, the Company had not incurred any subordinated participation in net sale proceeds to the Advisor or its affiliates. The Fourth A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement, which became effective immediately following the Contributions, does not provide for the payment of a subordinated participation in net sales proceeds to the Advisor or its affiliates.

The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement became effective following completion of the Contributions, and provides that the Advisor, as a special limited partner of CVOP II, would be entitled to a distribution upon an Investment Liquidity Event (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement). The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement also increases the threshold of the Priority Return (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement) from 6.0% to 8.0%, as previously agreed to and disclosed in connection with the REIT Merger.

Subordinated Incentive Listing Fee

Prior to the completion of the REIT Merger on October 4, 2019, upon the listing of the Company’s shares on a national securities exchange, the Advisor would have received 15% of the amount by which the sum of the Company’s adjusted market value plus distributions exceeded the sum of the aggregate capital contributed by investors plus an amount equal to a 6.0% annual cumulative, non-compounded return to investors, or the subordinated incentive listing fee. As of October 4, 2019, the Company had not incurred any subordinated incentive listing fees to the Advisor or its affiliates. The Fourth A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement does not provide for the payment of a subordinated incentive listing fee to the Advisor or its affiliates. The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement provides that the Advisor, as a special limited partner of CVOP II, would be entitled to a distribution upon an Investment Liquidity Event (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement). The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement also increases the threshold of the Priority Return (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement) from 6.0% to 8.0%, as previously agreed to and disclosed in connection with the REIT Merger.

F-26

---

Table of Contents

Subordinated Distribution Upon Termination Fee

Prior to the completion of the REIT Merger on October 4, 2019, upon termination or non-renewal of the advisory agreement, with or without cause, the Advisor would have been entitled to receive subordinated termination fees from the Operating Partnership equal to 15% of the amount by which the sum of the Company’s adjusted market value plus distributions exceeded the sum of the aggregate capital contributed by investors plus an amount equal to an annual 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded return to investors. As of October 4, 2019, the Company had not incurred any subordinated termination fees to the Advisor or its affiliates. The Fourth A&R CVREIT II Advisory Agreement does not provide for the payment of a subordinated termination fee to the Advisor or its affiliates. The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement provides that the Advisor, as a special limited partner of CVOP II, would be entitled to a distribution upon the termination of the Fourth A&R Advisory Agreement (unless such termination is by the Company because of a material breach of the Fourth A&R Advisory Agreement or occurs upon a change of control). The A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement also increases the threshold of the Priority Return (as defined in the A&R CVOP II Partnership Agreement) from 6.0% to 8.0%, as previously agreed to and disclosed in connection with the REIT Merger.

The following table details amounts incurred in connection with the Company's related parties transactions as described above for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (amounts in thousands):

				Incurred
				Year Ended December 31,
Fee		Entity		2019				2018				2017
Distribution and servicing fees		SC Distributors, LLC		$	(563	)	(1)	$	368			$	9,617
Acquisition fees and costs		Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and its affiliates		26,072				4,272				11,979
Asset management fees		Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and its affiliates		16,475				13,114				9,963
Property management fees		Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC		5,403				4,391				3,246
Operating expense reimbursement		Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and its affiliates		4,492				2,692				2,101
Leasing commission fees		Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC		1,241				497				907
Construction management fees		Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC		276				243				719
Total				$	53,396			$	25,577			$	38,532

(1)	Reduction of distribution and servicing fees is a result of repurchases of Class T and Class T2 shares of common stock.

The following table details amounts payable to affiliates in connection with the Company's related parties transactions as described above as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands):

				Payable
				December 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
Fee		Entity
Other offering costs reimbursement		Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and its affiliates		$	—			$	89
Distribution and servicing fees		SC Distributors, LLC		6,210				10,218
Acquisition fees and costs		Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and its affiliates		—				32
Asset management fees		Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and its affiliates		2,100				1,182
Property management fees		Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC		433				420
Operating expense reimbursement		Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and its affiliates		518				421
Leasing commission fees		Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC		299				25
Construction management fees		Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC		199				40
Total				$	9,759			$	12,427

Note 12—Segment Reporting

Management reviews the performance of individual properties and aggregates individual properties based on operating criteria into two reportable segments—commercial real estate investments in data centers and healthcare, and makes operating decisions based on these two reportable segments. The Company’s commercial real estate investments in data centers and healthcare are based on certain underwriting assumptions and operating criteria, which are different for data centers and healthcare.

The Company evaluates performance based on net operating income of the individual properties in each segment. Net operating income, a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as rental revenue, less rental expenses, which excludes

F-27

---

Table of Contents

depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, asset management fees, impairment loss on real estate, gain on real estate disposition and interest and other expense, net. The Company believes that segment net operating income serves as a useful supplement to net income because it allows investors and management to measure unlevered property-level operating results and to compare operating results to the operating results of other real estate companies between periods on a consistent basis. Segment net operating income should not be considered as an alternative to net income determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of financial performance, and accordingly, the Company believes that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of the consolidated historical operating results, segment net operating income should be examined in conjunction with net income as presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Non-segment assets primarily consist of corporate assets, including cash and cash equivalents, real estate and escrow deposits, deferred financing costs attributable to the revolving line of credit portion of the Company's credit facility, leasing commissions and other assets not attributable to individual properties.

Summary information for the reportable segments during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 is as follows (amounts in thousands):

	Data Center				Healthcare				Year Ended December 31, 2019
Revenue:
Rental revenue	$	109,689			$	101,212			$	210,901
Expenses:
Rental expenses	(30,270		)		(10,714		)		(40,984		)
Segment net operating income	$	79,419			$	90,498			169,917
Expenses:
General and administrative expenses									(8,421		)
Asset management fees									(16,475		)
Depreciation and amortization									(74,104		)
Impairment loss on real estate - healthcare									(21,000		)
Gain on real estate disposition									79
Income from operations									49,996
Interest and other expense, net									(47,214		)
Net income attributable to common stockholders									$	2,782

	Data Center				Healthcare				Year Ended December 31, 2018
Revenue:
Rental revenue	$	103,226			$	74,107			$	177,333
Expenses:
Rental expenses	(27,289		)		(10,038		)		(37,327		)
Segment net operating income	$	75,937			$	64,069			140,006
Expenses:
General and administrative expenses									(5,396		)
Asset management fees									(13,114		)
Depreciation and amortization									(58,258		)
Income from operations									63,238
Interest and other expense, net									(34,365		)
Net income attributable to common stockholders									$	28,873

F-28

---

Table of Contents

	Data Center				Healthcare				Year Ended December 31, 2017
Revenue:
Rental revenue	$	62,377			$	62,710			$	125,087
Expenses:
Rental expenses	(17,571		)		(8,525		)		(26,096		)
Segment net operating income	$	44,806			$	54,185			98,991
Expenses:
General and administrative expenses									(4,069		)
Asset management fees									(9,963		)
Depreciation and amortization									(41,133		)
Income from operations									43,826
Interest and other expense, net									(22,547		)
Net income attributable to common stockholders									$	21,279

There were no intersegment sales or transfers during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

Assets by each reportable segment as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows (amounts in thousands):

	December 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
Assets by segment:
Data centers	$	989,953			$	1,001,357
Healthcare	2,184,450				900,114
All other	65,131				62,358
Total assets	$	3,239,534			$	1,963,829

Capital additions, acquisitions and dispositions on a cash basis by reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 are as follows (amounts in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019				2018				2017
Capital additions by segment:
Data Centers	$	7,004			$	2,763			$	197
Healthcare	5,837				12,820				32,314
Total	12,841				15,583				32,511
Acquisitions by segment:
Data Centers	—				112,181				472,241
Healthcare	528,259				105,151				132,131
Total	528,259				217,332				604,372
Dispositions by segment:
Data Centers	—				—				—
Healthcare	(2,882		)		—				—
Total	(2,882		)		—				—
Total capital additions, acquisitions and dispositions	$	538,218			$	232,915			$	636,883

Note 13—Fair Value

Notes payable—Fixed Rate—The estimated fair value of notes payable—fixed rate measured using observable inputs from similar liabilities (Level 2) was approximately $222,816,000 and $214,282,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, as compared to the outstanding principal of $219,567,000 and $220,351,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The estimated fair value of notes payable—variable rate fixed through interest rate swap agreements (Level 2) was

F-29

---

Table of Contents

approximately $238,555,000 and $241,739,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, as compared to the outstanding principal of $237,778,000 and $247,435,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Credit facility—Variable Rate—The outstanding principal of the credit facility—variable was $658,000,000 and $255,000,000, which approximated its fair value as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The fair value of the Company's variable rate credit facility is estimated based on the interest rates currently offered to the Company by financial institutions.

Credit facility—Fixed Rate—The estimated fair value of the credit facility—variable rate fixed through interest rate swap agreements (Level 2) was approximately $251,907,000 and $96,146,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, as compared to the outstanding principal of $250,000,000 and $100,000,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Note receivable—The outstanding principal balance of the note receivable in the amount of $2,700,000 and $0 approximated its fair value as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The fair value was measured using significant other observable inputs (Level 2), which requires certain judgments to be made by management.

Derivative instruments—Considerable judgment is necessary to develop estimated fair values of financial instruments. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amount the Company could realize, or be liable for, on disposition of the financial instruments. The Company determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its interest rate swaps fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The credit valuation adjustments associated with these instruments utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and the respective counterparty. However, as of December 31, 2019, the Company assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions, and determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its interest rate swaps. As a result, the Company determined that its interest rate swaps valuation in its entirety is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 14—"Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" for further discussion of the Company's derivative instruments.

The following tables show the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands):

	December 31, 2019
	Fair Value Hierarchy
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)				Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)				Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)				Total Fair Value
Assets:
Derivative assets	$	—			$	884			$	—			$	884
Total assets at fair value	$	—			$	884			$	—			$	884
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	—			$	5,588			$	—			$	5,588
Total liabilities at fair value	$	—			$	5,588			$	—			$	5,588

	December 31, 2018
	Fair Value Hierarchy
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)				Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)				Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)				Total Fair Value
Assets:
Derivative assets	$	—			$	6,204			$	—			$	6,204
Total assets at fair value	$	—			$	6,204			$	—			$	6,204

Real estate assets—As discussed in Note 2—"Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," during the third quarter ended September 30, 2019, real estate assets related to one healthcare property with an aggregate carrying amount of $40,266,000 were determined to be impaired and the carrying value of the property was reduced to its estimated fair value of $27,266,000. In addition, during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2019, real estate assets related to another healthcare property with an aggregate carrying amount of $30,412,000 were determined to be impaired and the carrying value of the property was reduced to its estimated fair value of $22,412,000. The fair values of the Company's impaired real estate assets were estimated using significant other observable inputs based on market activity. The Company used a market valuation approach, using comparable sales to estimate the fair value. Based upon these inputs, the Company determined that its valuation of the properties using a market approach model is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

F-30

---

Table of Contents

During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, no impairment losses were recorded on real estate assets.

The following table shows the fair value of the Company's real estate assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2019 (amounts in thousands):

	December 31, 2019
	Fair Value Hierarchy
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)				Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)				Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)				Re-Measured Balance				Total Losses (1)
Real estate assets	$	—			$	22,412			$	—			$	22,412			$	8,000

(1)	Total losses are included in impairment loss on real estate in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Note 14—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated, and that qualify, as cash flow hedges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying consolidated statements of stockholders' equity and are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company accelerated the reclassification of amounts in other comprehensive (loss) income to earnings, as a result of a hedged forecasted transaction becoming probable not to occur, due to a partial pre-payment of a note payable related to a healthcare property. The accelerated amount was a loss of $92,000 and was recorded in interest expense, net, in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest and other expense, net, as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable rate debt. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $1,352,000 will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as an increase to interest and other expense, net.

See Note 13—"Fair Value" for further discussion of the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments.

The following table summarizes the notional amount and fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments (amounts in thousands):

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments		Balance Sheet Location		Effective Dates		Maturity Dates		December 31, 2019												December 31, 2018
								Outstanding Notional Amount				Fair Value of								Outstanding Notional Amount				Fair Value of
												Asset				(Liability)								Asset				(Liability)
Interest rate swaps		Other assets, net/ Accounts payable and other liabilities		07/01/2016 to 01/01/2020	(1)	12/22/2020 to 12/31/2024		$	637,778			$	884			$	(5,588	)		$	347,435			$	6,204			$	—

(1)

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements, with an effective date of April 1, 2019, which effectively fixed LIBOR related to $150,000,000 of the term loans of the credit facility and three interest rate swap agreements, with an effective date of January 1, 2020, which will effectively fix LIBOR related to $150,000,000 of the term loans of the credit facility.

The notional amount under the agreements is an indication of the extent of the Company’s involvement in each instrument at the time, but does not represent exposure to credit, interest rate or market risks.

Accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on the intended use and designation of the derivative instrument. The Company designated the interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges to hedge the variability of the anticipated cash flows on its variable rate credit facility and notes payable. The change in fair value of the derivative

F-31

---

Table of Contents

instruments that are designated as hedges are recorded in other comprehensive (loss) income, or OCI, in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

The table below summarizes the amount of (loss) income recognized on the interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (amounts in thousands):

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships		Amount of (Loss) Income Recognized in OCI on Derivatives				Location of (Loss) Income Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to Net Income		Amount of Income (Loss) Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to Net Income				Total Amount of Interest and Other Expense, Net Presented in Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Year Ended December 31, 2019
Interest rate swaps		$	(9,305	)		Interest and other expense, net		$	1,602			$	47,214
Total		$	(9,305	)				$	1,602
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Interest rate swaps		$	3,208			Interest and other expense, net		$	818			$	34,365
Total		$	3,208					$	818
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Interest rate swaps		$	1,484			Interest and other expense, net		$	(1,386	)		$	22,547
Total		$	1,484					$	(1,386	)

Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features

The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the Company either defaults or is capable of being declared in default on any of its indebtedness, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The Company records credit risk valuation adjustments on its interest rate swaps based on the respective credit quality of the Company and the counterparty. The Company believes it mitigates its credit risk by entering into agreements with creditworthy counterparties. As of December 31, 2019, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position was $5,926,000, inclusive of accrued interest but excluding any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to the agreement. As of December 31, 2019, there were no termination events or events of default related to the interest rate swaps.

Tabular Disclosure Offsetting Derivatives

The Company has elected not to offset derivative positions in its consolidated financial statements. The following tables present the effect on the Company’s financial position had the Company made the election to offset its derivative positions as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands):

Offsetting of Derivative Assets
														Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Balance Sheet
		Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets				Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet				Net Amounts of Assets Presented in the Balance Sheet				Financial Instruments Collateral				Cash Collateral				Net Amount
December 31, 2019		$	884			$	—			$	884			$	(5	)		$	—			$	879
December 31, 2018		$	6,204			$	—			$	6,204			$	—			$	—			$	6,204

Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities
														Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Balance Sheet
		Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities				Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet				Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Balance Sheet				Financial Instruments Collateral				Cash Collateral				Net Amount
December 31, 2019		$	5,588			$	—			$	5,588			$	(5	)		$	—			$	5,583
December 31, 2018		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—

The Company reports derivative assets and derivative liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as other assets, net, and accounts payable and other liabilities, respectively.

F-32

---

Table of Contents

Note 15—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents a rollforward of amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (amounts in thousands):

		Unrealized Income (Loss) on Derivative Instruments
Balance as of December 31, 2016		$	840
Other comprehensive income before reclassification		1,484
Amount of loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income (effective portion)		1,386
Other comprehensive income		2,870
Balance as of December 31, 2017		3,710
Other comprehensive income before reclassification		3,208
Amount of income reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income (effective portion)		(818		)
Other comprehensive income		2,390
Balance as of December 31, 2018		6,100
Cumulative effect of accounting change		103
Balance as of January 1, 2019		6,203
Other comprehensive loss before reclassification		(9,305		)
Amount of income reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income (including missed forecast)		(1,602		)
Other comprehensive loss		(10,907		)
Balance as of December 31, 2019		$	(4,704	)

The following table presents reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017(amounts in thousands):

Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components		Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to Net Income												Affected Line Items in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income
		Year Ended December 31,
		2019				2018				2017
Interest rate swap contracts		$	(1,602	)		$	(818	)		$	1,386			Interest and other expense, net

Note 16—Stock-based Compensation

On May 6, 2014, the Company adopted the Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc. 2014 Restricted Share Plan, or the Incentive Plan, pursuant to which the Company has the power and authority to grant restricted or deferred stock awards to persons eligible under the Incentive Plan. The Company authorized and reserved 300,000 shares of its Class A shares for issuance under the Incentive Plan, subject to certain adjustments. Subject to certain limited exceptions, restricted stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of and is subject to forfeiture within the vesting period. Restricted stock awards generally vest ratably over four years. The Company uses the straight-line method to recognize expenses for service awards with graded vesting. Restricted stock awards are entitled to receive dividends during the vesting period. In addition to the ratable amortization of fair value over the vesting period, dividends paid on unvested shares of restricted stock which are not expected to vest are charged to compensation expense in the period paid.

On September 25, 2019, the Company granted an aggregate of 12,000 shares of restricted Class A common stock to its independent directors in connection with their re-election to the board of directors of the Company. The fair value of each share of restricted common stock was estimated at the date of grant at $9.25 per share. The restricted stock awards vest over a period of four years. The awards are amortized using the straight-line method over four years.

On March 6, 2020, the Company's board of directors approved the Amended and Restated 2014 Restricted Share Plan, or the A&R Incentive Plan. See Note 21—"Subsequent Events" for more information.

F-33

---

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there was $215,000 and $192,000, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested shares of the Company’s restricted Class A common stock. This expense is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 2.25 years. This expected expense does not include the impact of any future stock-based compensation awards.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the fair value of the nonvested shares of restricted Class A common stock was $240,038 and $235,875, respectively. A summary of the status of the nonvested shares of restricted Class A common stock as of December 31, 2018 and the changes for the year ended December 31, 2019 is presented below:

Restricted Stock		Shares
Nonvested at December 31, 2018		25,500
Vested		(9,750	)
Granted		12,000
Nonvested at December 31, 2019		27,750

Stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was approximately $89,000, $90,000 and $76,000, respectively, which is reported in general and administrative costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

F-34

---

Table of Contents

Note 17—Income Taxes

As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to the stockholders. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, distributions to stockholders are characterized as either ordinary dividends, capital gain distributions, or nontaxable distributions. Nontaxable distributions will reduce U.S. stockholders’ respective bases in their shares. The following table shows the character of distributions the Company paid on a percentage basis during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

		Year Ended December 31,
Character of Class A Distributions:		2019			2018			2017
Ordinary dividends		17.93	%		41.38	%		36.49	%
Capital gain distributions		0.38	%		—	%		—	%
Nontaxable distributions		81.69	%		58.62	%		63.51	%
Total		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%
		Year Ended December 31,
Character of Class I Distributions:		2019			2018			2017
Ordinary dividends		17.93	%		41.38	%		36.49	%
Capital gain distributions		0.38	%		—	%		—	%
Nontaxable distributions		81.69	%		58.62	%		63.51	%
Total		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%
		Year Ended December 31,
Character of Class T Distributions:		2019			2018			2017
Ordinary dividends		4.79	%		33.01	%		25.93	%
Capital gain distributions		0.43	%		—	%		—	%
Nontaxable distributions		94.78	%		66.99	%		74.07	%
Total		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%
		Year Ended December 31,
Character of Class T2 Distributions:		2019			2018			2017
Ordinary dividends		4.79	%		33.01	%		—	%
Capital gain distributions		0.43	%		—	%		—	%
Nontaxable distributions		94.78	%		66.99	%		—	%
Total		100.00	%		100.00	%		—	%

---

	2019
	Fourth Quarter				Third Quarter				Second Quarter				First Quarter
Total revenue	$	69,434			$	48,063			$	46,937			$	46,467
Total expenses	(52,160		)		(45,773		)		(30,780		)		(32,271		)
Gain on real estate disposition	79				—				—				—
Income from operations	17,353				2,290				16,157				14,196
Interest and other expense, net	(15,566		)		(11,920		)		(9,893		)		(9,835		)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	1,787			$	(9,630	)		$	6,264			$	4,361
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic	$	0.01			$	(0.07	)		$	0.05			$	0.03
Diluted	$	0.01			$	(0.07	)		$	0.05			$	0.03
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic	218,928,165				137,063,509				136,135,710				136,179,343
Diluted	218,955,915				137,063,509				136,161,037				136,204,843

	2018
	Fourth Quarter				Third Quarter				Second Quarter				First Quarter
Total revenue	$	46,571			$	45,517			$	43,951			$	41,294
Total expenses	(30,627		)		(28,863		)		(28,556		)		(26,049		)
Income from operations	15,944				16,654				15,395				15,245
Interest and other expense, net	(9,478		)		(8,937		)		(8,209		)		(7,741		)
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	6,466			$	7,717			$	7,186			$	7,504
Net income per common share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic	$	0.05			$	0.06			$	0.06			$	0.06
Diluted	$	0.05			$	0.06			$	0.06			$	0.06
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic	135,271,638				132,467,127				129,926,130				126,384,346
Diluted	135,297,138				132,491,755				129,948,432				126,401,940

---

Note 21—Subsequent Events

Distributions Paid to Stockholders

The following table summarizes the Company's distributions paid on January 2, 2020, for the period from December 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 (amounts in thousands):

Payment Date		Common Stock		Cash				DRIP				Total Distribution
January 2, 2020		Class A		$	5,442			$	1,648			$	7,090
January 2, 2020		Class I		323				215				538
January 2, 2020		Class T		628				715				1,343
January 2, 2020		Class T2		53				69				122
				$	6,446			$	2,647			$	9,093

The following table summarizes the Company's distributions paid on February 3, 2020, for the period from January 1, 2020 through January 31, 2020 (amounts in thousands):

Payment Date		Common Stock		Cash				DRIP				Total Distribution
February 3, 2020		Class A		$	5,431			$	1,646			$	7,077
February 3, 2020		Class I		324				213				537
February 3, 2020		Class T		631				712				1,343
February 3, 2020		Class T2		52				69				121
				$	6,438			$	2,640			$	9,078

The following table summarizes the Company's distributions paid on March 3, 2020, for the period from February 1, 2020 through February 29, 2020 (amounts in thousands):

Payment Date		Common Stock		Cash				DRIP				Total Distribution
March 3, 2020		Class A		$	5,060			$	1,526			$	6,586
March 3, 2020		Class I		299				197				496
March 3, 2020		Class T		595				660				1,255
March 3, 2020		Class T2		50				63				113
				$	6,004			$	2,446			$	8,450

Distributions Authorized

The following tables summarize the daily distributions approved and authorized by the board of directors of the Company subsequent to December 31, 2019:

Authorization Date (1)		Common Stock		Daily Distribution Rate (1)				Annualized Distribution Per Share
February 24, 2020		Class A		$	0.001366120			$	0.50
February 24, 2020		Class I		$	0.001366120			$	0.50
February 24, 2020		Class T		$	0.001129781			$	0.41
February 24, 2020		Class T2		$	0.001129781			$	0.41

(1)

Distributions approved and authorized to stockholders of record as of the close of business on each day of the period commencing on March 1, 2020 and ending on May 31, 2020. The distributions will be calculated based on 366 days in the calendar year. The distributions declared for each record date in March 2020, April 2020 and May 2020 will be paid in April 2020, May 2020 and June 2020, respectively. The distributions will be payable to stockholders from legally available funds therefor.

F-37

---

Table of Contents

Acquisitions

The following table summarizes the property acquired subsequent to December 31, 2019 and through March 24, 2020:

Property		Date Acquired		Contract Purchase Price		Ownership
Grimes Healthcare Facility		02/19/2020		$4,825,000		100%

Amended and Restated Incentive Plan

On March 6, 2020, the Company's board of directors approved the A&R Incentive Plan, pursuant to which the Company has the authority and power to grant awards of restricted shares of its Class A common stock to its directors, officers and employees (if the Company ever has employees), employees of the Advisor and its affiliates, employees of entities that provide services to the Company, directors of the Advisor or of entities that provide services to the Company, certain of the Company’s consultants and certain consultants to the Advisor and its affiliates or to entities that provide services to the Company. The Board has authorized a total of 5,000,000 Class A shares of common stock for issuance under the A&R Incentive Plan on a fully diluted basis at any time.

Independent Director Compensation

On March 6, 2020, the Company's board of directors determined to revise the amounts of restricted Class A shares of common stock the independent directors are entitled to receive each year as provided below.

On March 10, 2020, the Company granted each independent director 2,415 shares of restricted Class A common stock, with a per share price of $8.65, and beginning July 1, 2020 and each July 1 thereafter, the Company will grant each independent director $60,000 in restricted shares of Class A common stock. Restricted stock issued to the Company’s independent directors will vest over a three-year period following the first anniversary of the date of grant in increments of 33.34% per annum.

On March 6, 2020, the Company's board of directors also approved the following annual compensation amounts for its independent directors, effective as of November 7, 2019: (i) a cash retainer of $90,000 per year (the chairperson of the audit committee will receive an additional $15,000 per year) plus (ii) $2,500 for each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting the director attends in person.

On March 19, 2020, due to the current coronavirus (COVID-19) situation, the Company's board of directors revised the meeting fees to be paid to each independent director to include regularly scheduled quarterly meetings that are required to be held telephonically. Therefore, each independent director will receive $2,500 for each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting the director attends (whether the meeting is in person or telephonic).

F-38

---

Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2019

(in thousands)

								Initial Cost								Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (b)				Gross Amount Carried at December 31, 2019
Property Description		Location		Encumbrances				Land				Buildings and Improvements								Land				Buildings and Improvements (c)				Total				Accumulated Depreciation (d)				Year Constructed			Year Renovated			Date Acquired
Houston Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Cy Fair Surgical Center		Houston, TX		$	—		(a)	$	762			$	2,970			$	106			$	762			$	3,076			$	3,838			$	551			1993			—			07/31/2014
Cincinnati Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Mercy Healthcare Facility		Cincinnati, OH		—			(a)	356				3,167				89				356				3,256				3,612				504				2001			—			10/29/2014
Winston-Salem Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Winston-Salem, NC IMF		Winston-Salem, NC		—			(a)	684				4,903				—				684				4,903				5,587				736				2004			—			12/17/2014
Stoughton Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. New England Sinai Medical Center		Stoughton, MA		—			(a)	4,049				19,991				1,918				4,049				21,909				25,958				2,965				1973			1997			12/23/2014
Fort Worth Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Baylor Surgical Hospital at Fort Worth		Fort Worth, TX		—			(a)	8,297				35,615				—				8,297				35,615				43,912				4,707				2014			—			12/31/2014
Fort Worth Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Baylor Surgical Hospital Integrated Medical Facility		Fort Worth, TX		—			(a)	367				1,587				164				367				1,751				2,118				399				2014			—			12/31/2014
Winter Haven Healthcare Facility		Winter Haven, FL		—			(a)	—				2,805				—				—				2,805				2,805				386				2009			—			01/27/2015
Overland Park Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Heartland Rehabilitation Hospital		Overland Park, KS		—			(a)	1,558				20,549				—				1,558				20,549				22,107				2,633				2014			—			02/17/2015
Indianapolis Data Center		Indianapolis, IN		—			(a)	524				6,422				37				524				6,459				6,983				789				2000			2014			04/01/2015
Clarion Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Clarion IMF		Clarion, PA		—			(a)	462				5,377				—				462				5,377				5,839				826				2012			—			06/01/2015
Webster Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Post Acute Webster Rehabilitation Hospital		Webster, TX		—			(a)	1,858				20,140				—				1,858				20,140				21,998				2,399				2015			—			06/05/2015
Eagan Data Center		Eagan, MN		—			(a)	768				5,037				—				768				5,037				5,805				706				1998			2015			06/29/2015
Houston Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Houston Surgical Hospital and LTACH		Houston, TX		—				8,329				36,297				(17,360		)		8,329				18,937				27,266				151				1950			2005/2008			06/30/2015
Augusta Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. KMO IMF - Augusta		Augusta, ME		—			(a)	556				14,401				—				556				14,401				14,957				1,816				2010			—			07/22/2015
Cincinnati Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. KMO IMF - Cincinnati I		Cincinnati, OH		—			(a)	1,812				24,382				—				1,812				24,382				26,194				3,177				1960			2014			07/22/2015
Cincinnati Healthcare Facility III, f.k.a. KMO IMF - Cincinnati II		Cincinnati, OH		—			(a)	446				10,239				4				446				10,243				10,689				1,214				2014			—			07/22/2015
Florence Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. KMO IMF - Florence		Florence, KY		—			(a)	650				9,919				—				650				9,919				10,569				1,172				2014			—			07/22/2015
Oakland Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. KMO IMF - Oakland		Oakland, ME		—			(a)	229				5,416				—				229				5,416				5,645				738				2014			—			07/22/2015
Wyomissing Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Reading Surgical Hospital		Wyomissing, PA		—			(a)	1,504				20,193				—				1,504				20,193				21,697				2,433				2007			—			07/24/2015
Luling Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Post Acute Warm Springs Specialty Hospital of Luling		Luling, TX		—			(a)	824				7,530				—				824				7,530				8,354				902				2002			—			07/30/2015
Minnetonka Data Center		Minnetonka, MN		—			(a)	2,085				15,099				119				1,999				15,304				17,303				2,343				1985			2001/2006 /2012/2015			08/28/2015
Omaha Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Nebraska Healthcare Facility		Omaha, NE		—			(a)	1,259				9,796				—				1,259				9,796				11,055				1,083				2014			—			10/14/2015

S-1

---

Table of Contents

								Initial Cost								Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (b)				Gross Amount Carried at December 31, 2019
Property Description		Location		Encumbrances				Land				Buildings and Improvements								Land				Buildings and Improvements (c)				Total				Accumulated Depreciation (d)				Year Constructed			Year Renovated			Date Acquired
Sherman Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Heritage Park - Sherman I		Sherman, TX		—			(a)	1,679				23,926				—				1,679				23,926				25,605				2,564				2005			2010			11/20/2015
Sherman Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Heritage Park - Sherman II		Sherman, TX		—			(a)	214				3,209				—				214				3,209				3,423				347				2005			—			11/20/2015
Fort Worth Healthcare Facility III, f.k.a. Baylor Surgery Center at Fort Worth		Fort Worth, TX		—			(a)	3,120				9,312				—				3,120				9,312				12,432				990				1998			2007/2015			12/23/2015
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. HPI - Oklahoma City I		Oklahoma City, OK		22,259				4,626				30,509				—				4,626				30,509				35,135				3,348				1985			1998/2003			12/29/2015
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. HPI - Oklahoma City II		Oklahoma City, OK		—			(a)	991				8,366				—				991				8,366				9,357				976				1994			1999			12/29/2015
Waco Data Center		Waco, TX		—			(a)	873				8,233				—				873				8,233				9,106				842				1956			2009			12/30/2015
Edmond Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. HPI - Edmond		Edmond, OK		—			(a)	796				3,199				—				796				3,199				3,995				372				2002			—			01/20/2016
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility III, f.k.a. HPI - Oklahoma City IV		Oklahoma City, OK		—			(a)	452				1,081				—				452				1,081				1,533				129				2006			—			01/27/2016
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility IV, f.k.a. HPI - Oklahoma City III		Oklahoma City, OK		—			(a)	368				2,344				—				368				2,344				2,712				273				2007			—			01/27/2016
Alpharetta Data Center, f.k.a. Alpharetta Data Center III		Alpharetta, GA		—			(a)	3,395				11,081				25				3,395				11,106				14,501				1,193				1999			—			02/02/2016
Flint Data Center		Flint, MI		—			(a)	111				7,001				—				111				7,001				7,112				735				1989			2016			02/02/2016
Newcastle Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. HPI - Newcastle		Newcastle, OK		—			(a)	412				1,173				—				412				1,173				1,585				138				1995			1999			02/03/2016
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility V, f.k.a. HPI - Oklahoma City V		Oklahoma City, OK		—			(a)	541				12,445				—				541				12,445				12,986				1,423				2008			—			02/11/2016
Rancho Mirage Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Vibra Rehabilitation Hospital		Rancho Mirage, CA		—				2,724				7,626				29,844				2,726				37,468				40,194				1,288				2018			—			03/01/2016
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility VI, f.k.a. HPI - Oklahoma City VI		Oklahoma City, OK		—			(a)	896				3,684				—				896				3,684				4,580				424				2007			—			03/07/2016
Franklin Data Center, f.k.a. Tennessee Data Center		Franklin, TN		—			(a)	6,624				10,971				135				6,624				11,106				17,730				1,138				2016			2019			03/31/2016
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility VII, f.k.a. HPI - Oklahoma City VII		Oklahoma City, OK		24,547				3,203				32,380				—				3,203				32,380				35,583				3,009				2016			—			06/22/2016
Las Vegas Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Post Acute Las Vegas Rehabilitation Hospital		Las Vegas, NV		—			(a)	2,614				639				22,091				2,895				22,449				25,344				1,209				2017			—			06/24/2016
Somerset Data Center		Somerset, NJ		—			(a)	906				10,466				—				906				10,466				11,372				1,071				1978			2016			06/29/2016
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility VIII, f.k.a. Integris Lakeside Women's Hospital		Oklahoma City, OK		—			(a)	2,002				15,384				—				2,002				15,384				17,386				1,410				1997			2008			06/30/2016
Hawthorne Data Center, f.k.a. AT&T Hawthorne Data Center		Hawthorne, CA		39,749				16,498				57,312				—				16,498				57,312				73,810				4,797				1963			1983/2001			09/27/2016
McLean Data Center, f.k.a. McLean I		McLean, VA		23,460				31,554				4,930				330				31,554				5,260				36,814				464				1966			1998			10/17/2016
McLean Data Center II, f.k.a. McLean II		McLean, VA		27,540				20,392				22,727				105				20,392				22,832				43,224				1,883				1991			2019			10/17/2016
Marlton Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Select Medical Rehabilitation Facility		Marlton, NJ		31,145				—				57,154				5				—				57,159				57,159				4,467				1995			—			11/01/2016
Andover Data Center, f.k.a. Andover Data Center II		Andover, MA		—			(a)	6,566				28,072				514				6,566				28,586				35,152				2,497				2000			—			11/08/2016
Grand Rapids Healthcare Facility		Grand Rapids, MI		21,766				2,533				39,487				95				2,533				39,582				42,115				3,831				2008			—			12/07/2016
Corpus Christi Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Corpus Christi Surgery Center		Corpus Christi, TX		—			(a)	975				4,963				462				1,002				5,398				6,400				459				1992			—			12/22/2016

S-2

---

Table of Contents

								Initial Cost								Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (b)				Gross Amount Carried at December 31, 2019
Property Description		Location		Encumbrances				Land				Buildings and Improvements								Land				Buildings and Improvements (c)				Total				Accumulated Depreciation (d)				Year Constructed			Year Renovated			Date Acquired
Chicago Data Center, f.k.a. Chicago Data Center II		Downers Grove, IL		—			(a)	1,329				29,940				(545		)		1,358				29,366				30,724				2,276				1987			2016			12/28/2016
Blythewood Data Center		Blythewood, SC		—			(a)	612				17,714				27				634				17,719				18,353				1,375				1983			—			12/29/2016
Tempe Data Center		Tempe, AZ		—			(a)	2,997				11,991				132				2,997				12,123				15,120				937				1977			2016			01/26/2017
Aurora Healthcare Facility		Aurora, IL		—			(a)	973				9,632				—				973				9,632				10,605				726				2002			—			03/30/2017
Norwalk Data Center		Norwalk, CT		34,200				10,125				43,360				94				10,125				43,454				53,579				3,096				2013			—			03/30/2017
Allen Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Texas Rehab - Allen		Allen, TX		13,136				857				20,582				—				857				20,582				21,439				1,547				2007			—			03/31/2017
Austin Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Texas Rehab - Austin		Austin, TX		20,861				1,368				32,039				—				1,368				32,039				33,407				2,408				2012			—			03/31/2017
Beaumont Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Texas Rehab - Beaumont		Beaumont, TX		5,863				946				8,372				—				946				8,372				9,318				633				1991			—			03/31/2017
Charlotte Data Center, f.k.a. Charlotte Data Center II		Charlotte, NC		—			(a)	372				17,131				3,206				372				20,337				20,709				1,387				1989			2016			05/15/2017
Atlanta Data Center, f.k.a. 250 Williams Atlanta Data Center		Atlanta, GA		116,200				19,159				129,778				6,397				19,159				136,175				155,334				12,264				1989			2007			06/15/2017
Sunnyvale Data Center		Sunnyvale, CA		—			(a)	10,013				24,709				—				10,013				24,709				34,722				1,616				1992			1998			06/28/2017
San Antonio Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Texas Rehab - San Antonio		San Antonio, TX		10,490				1,813				11,706				—				1,813				11,706				13,519				807				2012			—			06/29/2017
Cincinnati Data Center		Cincinnati, OH		—			(a)	1,556				8,966				—				1,556				8,966				10,522				637				1985			2010			06/30/2017
Silverdale Healthcare Facility		Silverdale, WA		—			(a)	1,530				7,506				15				1,530				7,521				9,051				545				2005			—			08/25/2017
Silverdale Healthcare Facility II		Silverdale, WA		—			(a)	1,542				4,981				—				1,542				4,981				6,523				383				2007			—			09/20/2017
King of Prussia Data Center		King of Prussia, PA		11,961				1,015				17,413				—				1,015				17,413				18,428				1,031				1960			1997			09/28/2017
Tempe Data Center II		Tempe, AZ		—			(a)	—				15,803				—				—				15,803				15,803				947				1998			—			09/29/2017
Houston Data Center		Houston, TX		48,607				10,082				101,051				—				10,082				101,051				111,133				5,447				2013			—			11/16/2017
Saginaw Healthcare Facility		Saginaw, MI		—			(a)	1,251				15,878				—				1,251				15,878				17,129				1,148				2002			—			12/21/2017
Elgin Data Center		Elgin, IL		5,561				1,067				7,861				(421		)		1,067				7,440				8,507				413				2000			—			12/22/2017
Oklahoma City Data Center		Oklahoma City, OK		—			(a)	1,868				44,253				—				1,868				44,253				46,121				2,322				2008/2016			—			12/27/2017
Rancho Cordova Data Center, f.k.a. Rancho Cordova Data Center I		Rancho Cordova, CA		—			(a)	1,760				32,109				—				1,760				32,109				33,869				1,464				1982			2008/2010			03/14/2018
Rancho Cordova Data Center II		Rancho Cordova, CA		—			(a)	1,943				10,340				—				1,943				10,340				12,283				481				1984			2012			03/14/2018
Carrollton Healthcare Facility		Carrollton, TX		—			(a)	1,995				5,870				—				1,995				5,870				7,865				278				2015			—			04/27/2018
Katy Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Oceans Katy Behavioral Health Hospital		Katy, TX		—			(a)	1,443				12,114				—				1,443				12,114				13,557				485				2015			—			06/08/2018
San Jose Data Center		San Jose, CA		—			(a)	12,205				34,309				—				12,205				34,309				46,514				1,359				1999			2009			06/13/2018
Indianola Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Indianola Healthcare I		Indianola, IA		—			(a)	330				5,698				—				330				5,698				6,028				201				2014			—			09/26/2018
Indianola Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Indianola Healthcare II		Indianola, IA		—			(a)	709				6,061				—				709				6,061				6,770				221				2011			—			09/26/2018
Canton Data Center		Canton, OH		—			(a)	345				8,268				—				345				8,268				8,613				259				2008			—			10/03/2018
Benton Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Benton Healthcare I (Benton)		Benton, AR		—			(a)	—				19,048				—				—				19,048				19,048				625				1992/1999			—			10/17/2018
Benton Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Benton Healthcare III (Benton)		Benton, AR		—			(a)	—				1,647				—				—				1,647				1,647				60				1983			—			10/17/2018

S-3

---

Table of Contents

								Initial Cost								Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (b)				Gross Amount Carried at December 31, 2019
Property Description		Location		Encumbrances				Land				Buildings and Improvements								Land				Buildings and Improvements (c)				Total				Accumulated Depreciation (d)				Year Constructed			Year Renovated			Date Acquired
Bryant Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Benton Healthcare II (Bryant)		Bryant, AR		—			(a)	930				3,539				—				930				3,539				4,469				128				1995			—			10/17/2018
Hot Springs Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Benton Healthcare IV (Hot Springs)		Hot Springs, AR		—			(a)	384				2,077				—				384				2,077				2,461				78				2009			—			10/17/2018
Clive Healthcare Facility		Clive, IA		—			(a)	336				22,332				—				336				22,332				22,668				789				2008			—			11/26/2018
Valdosta Healthcare Facility, f.k.a. Valdosta Healthcare I		Valdosta, GA		—			(a)	659				5,626				—				659				5,626				6,285				199				2004			—			11/28/2018
Valdosta Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Valdosta Healthcare II		Valdosta, GA		—			(a)	471				2,780				—				471				2,780				3,251				100				1992			—			11/28/2018
Bryant Healthcare Facility II, f.k.a. Bryant Healthcare Facility		Bryant, AR		—			(a)	647				3,364				—				647				3,364				4,011				36				2016			—			08/16/2019
Laredo Healthcare Facility		Laredo, TX		—			(a)	—				12,137				—				—				12,137				12,137				96				1998			—			09/19/2019
Laredo Healthcare Facility II		Laredo, TX		—			(a)	—				23,677				—				—				23,677				23,677				187				1998			—			09/19/2019
Poplar Bluff Healthcare Facility		Poplar Bluff, MO		—			(a)	—				13,515				—				—				13,515				13,515				107				2013			—			09/19/2019
Tucson Healthcare Facility		Tucson, AZ		—			(a)	—				5,998				—				—				5,998				5,998				48				1998			—			09/19/2019
Akron Healthcare Facility		Green, OH		—			(a)	3,503				38,512				—				3,503				38,512				42,015				214				2012			—			10/04/2019
Akron Healthcare Facility II		Green, OH		—			(a)	1,085				10,277				—				1,085				10,277				11,362				69				2013			—			10/04/2019
Akron Healthcare Facility III		Akron, OH		—			(a)	2,206				26,044				—				2,206				26,044				28,250				140				2008			—			10/04/2019
Alexandria Healthcare Facility		Alexandria, LA		—			(a)	—				5,076				—				—				5,076				5,076				27				2007			—			10/04/2019
Appleton Healthcare Facility		Appleton, WI		—			(a)	414				1,900				—				414				1,900				2,314				14				2011			—			10/04/2019
Austin Healthcare Facility II		Austin, TX		—			(a)	3,229				7,534				(2,807		)		2,195				5,761				7,956				32				2006			—			10/04/2019
Bellevue Healthcare Facility		Green Bay, WI		—			(a)	567				1,269				—				567				1,269				1,836				9				2010			—			10/04/2019
Bonita Springs Healthcare Facility		Bonita Springs, FL		—			(a)	1,199				4,373				—				1,199				4,373				5,572				24				2002			2005			10/04/2019
Bridgeton Healthcare Facility		Bridgeton, MO		—			(a)	—				39,740				—				—				39,740				39,740				212				2012			—			10/04/2019
Covington Healthcare Facility		Covington, LA		—			(a)	2,238				16,635				—				2,238				16,635				18,873				88				1984			—			10/04/2019
Crestview Healthcare Facility		Crestview, FL		—			(a)	400				1,536				—				400				1,536				1,936				9				2004			2010			10/04/2019
Dallas Healthcare Facility		Dallas, TX		—			(a)	6,072				27,457				—				6,072				27,457				33,529				144				2010			—			10/04/2019
Dallas Healthcare Facility II		Dallas, TX		—				3,611				26,907				(8,106		)		2,662				19,750				22,412				—				1983			2013			10/04/2019
De Pere Healthcare Facility		De Pere, WI		—			(a)	615				1,596				—				615				1,596				2,211				11				2005			—			10/04/2019
Denver Healthcare Facility		Thornton, CO		—			(a)	3,586				32,363				—				3,586				32,363				35,949				175				1962			2018			10/04/2019
El Segundo Healthcare Facility		El Segundo, CA		—			(a)	2,659				9,016				—				2,659				9,016				11,675				49				2009			—			10/04/2019
Fairlea Healthcare Facility		Fairlea, WV		—			(a)	139				1,910				—				139				1,910				2,049				11				1999			—			10/04/2019
Fayetteville Healthcare Facility		Fayetteville, AR		—			(a)	485				24,855				—				485				24,855				25,340				132				1994			2009			10/04/2019
Fort Myers Healthcare Facility		Fort Myers, FL		—			(a)	2,153				2,387				—				2,153				2,387				4,540				16				1999			—			10/04/2019
Fort Myers Healthcare Facility II		Fort Myers, FL		—			(a)	3,557				11,064				—				3,557				11,064				14,621				69				2010			—			10/04/2019
Fort Walton Beach Healthcare Facility		Fort Walton Beach, FL		—			(a)	385				3,182				—				385				3,182				3,567				18				2005			—			10/04/2019
Frankfort Healthcare Facility		Frankfort, KY		—			(a)	342				950				—				342				950				1,292				6				1993			—			10/04/2019
Frisco Healthcare Facility		Frisco, TX		—			(a)	—				22,114				4,200				—				26,314				26,314				125				2010			—			10/04/2019
Goshen Healthcare Facility		Goshen, IN		—			(a)	383				5,355				—				383				5,355				5,738				31				2010			—			10/04/2019
Grapevine Healthcare Facility		Grapevine, TX		—				1,726				26,849				—				1,726				26,849				28,575				144				2007			—			10/04/2019

S-4

---

Table of Contents

								Initial Cost								Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (b)				Gross Amount Carried at December 31, 2019
Property Description		Location		Encumbrances				Land				Buildings and Improvements								Land				Buildings and Improvements (c)				Total				Accumulated Depreciation (d)				Year Constructed			Year Renovated			Date Acquired
Hammond Healthcare Facility		Hammond, LA		—			(a)	2,693				23,750				—				2,693				23,750				26,443				131				2006			—			10/04/2019
Hammond Healthcare Facility II		Hammond, LA		—			(a)	950				12,147				—				950				12,147				13,097				66				2004			—			10/04/2019
Harlingen Healthcare Facility		Harlingen, TX		—				—				10,628				—				—				10,628				10,628				61				2007			—			10/04/2019
Henderson Healthcare Facility		Henderson, NV		—			(a)	839				2,390				—				839				2,390				3,229				14				2000			—			10/04/2019
Houston Healthcare Facility III		Houston, TX		—			(a)	752				5,832				—				752				5,832				6,584				31				1998			2018			10/04/2019
Howard Healthcare Facility		Howard, WI		—			(a)	529				1,818				—				529				1,818				2,347				13				2011			—			10/04/2019
Jacksonville Healthcare Facility		Jacksonville, FL		—			(a)	1,233				6,173				—				1,233				6,173				7,406				35				2009			—			10/04/2019
Lafayette Healthcare Facility		Lafayette, LA		—			(a)	4,819				35,424				—				4,819				35,424				40,243				191				2004			—			10/04/2019
Lakewood Ranch Healthcare Facility		Lakewood Ranch, FL		—			(a)	636				1,784				—				636				1,784				2,420				13				2008			—			10/04/2019
Las Vegas Healthcare Facility II		Las Vegas, NV		—			(a)	651				5,323				—				651				5,323				5,974				18				2007			—			10/04/2019
Lehigh Acres Healthcare Facility		Lehigh Acres, FL		—			(a)	441				2,956				—				441				2,956				3,397				17				2002			—			10/04/2019
Lubbock Healthcare Facility		Lubbock, TX		—			(a)	5,210				39,939				—				5,210				39,939				45,149				212				2003			—			10/04/2019
Manitowoc Healthcare Facility		Manitowoc, WI		—			(a)	257				1,733				—				257				1,733				1,990				12				2003			—			10/04/2019
Manitowoc Healthcare Facility II		Manitowoc, WI		—			(a)	250				11,231				—				250				11,231				11,481				66				1964			2010			10/04/2019
Marinette Healthcare Facility		Marinette, WI		—			(a)	208				1,002				—				208				1,002				1,210				7				2008			—			10/04/2019
New Bedford Healthcare Facility		New Bedford, MA		—			(a)	2,464				26,297				—				2,464				26,297				28,761				143				1942			1995			10/04/2019
New Braunfels Healthcare Facility		New Braunfels, TX		—			(a)	2,568				11,386				—				2,568				11,386				13,954				61				2007			—			10/04/2019
North Smithfield Healthcare Facility		North Smithfield, RI		—			(a)	1,309				14,024				—				1,309				14,024				15,333				80				1965			2000			10/04/2019
Oklahoma City Healthcare Facility IX		Oklahoma City, OK		—			(a)	1,316				9,822				—				1,316				9,822				11,138				60				2007			—			10/04/2019
Oshkosh Healthcare Facility		Oshkosh, WI		—			(a)	414				2,043				—				414				2,043				2,457				14				2010			—			10/04/2019
Palm Desert Healthcare Facility		Palm Desert, CA		—			(a)	582				5,927				—				582				5,927				6,509				36				2005			—			10/04/2019
Rancho Mirage Healthcare Facility II		Rancho Mirage, CA		—			(a)	2,286				5,481				—				2,286				5,481				7,767				32				2008			—			10/04/2019
San Antonio Healthcare Facility II		San Antonio, TX		—				5,935				23,411				221				5,935				23,632				29,567				128				2013			—			10/04/2019
San Antonio Healthcare Facility III		San Antonio, TX		—			(a)	1,824				22,809				—				1,824				22,809				24,633				120				2012			—			10/04/2019
San Antonio Healthcare Facility IV		San Antonio, TX		—			(a)	—				31,694				—				—				31,694				31,694				167				1987			—			10/04/2019
San Antonio Healthcare Facility V		San Antonio, TX		—			(a)	3,273				19,697				—				3,273				19,697				22,970				110				2017			—			10/04/2019
Santa Rosa Beach Healthcare Facility		Santa Rosa Beach, FL		—			(a)	741				3,049				—				741				3,049				3,790				16				2003			—			10/04/2019
Savannah Healthcare Facility		Savannah, GA		—			(a)	2,300				20,186				—				2,300				20,186				22,486				107				2014			—			10/04/2019
St. Louis Healthcare Facility		Creve Coeur, MO		—			(a)	1,164				8,052				—				1,164				8,052				9,216				45				2005			2007			10/04/2019
Sturgeon Bay Healthcare Facility		Sturgeon Bay, WI		—			(a)	248				700				—				248				700				948				5				2007			—			10/04/2019
Victoria Healthcare Facility		Victoria, TX		—			(a)	328				12,908				—				328				12,908				13,236				70				2013			—			10/04/2019
Victoria Healthcare Facility II		Victoria, TX		—			(a)	446				12,986				—				446				12,986				13,432				70				1998			—			10/04/2019
Webster Healthcare Facility II		Webster, TX		—			(a)	7,371				243,983				2,505				7,371				246,488				253,859				1,274				2014			2019			10/04/2019
Wilkes-Barre Healthcare Facility		Mountain Top, PA		—			(a)	821				4,139				—				821				4,139				4,960				26				2012			—			10/04/2019
Yucca Valley Healthcare Facility		Yucca Valley, CA		—			(a)	901				4,788				—				901				4,788				5,689				31				2009			—			10/04/2019
Tucson Healthcare Facility II		Tucson, AZ		—				—				—				1,764				—				1,764				1,764				—				(e)			(e)			12/26/2019
Tucson Healthcare Facility III		Tucson, AZ		—				1,763				—				1,152				1,763				1,152				2,915				—				(e)			(e)			12/27/2019
				$	457,345			$	345,152			$	2,505,097			$	46,517			$	343,444			$	2,553,322			$	2,896,766			$	128,304

S-5

---

Table of Contents

(a)	Property collateralized under the unsecured credit facility. As of December 31, 2019, 128 commercial properties were collateralized under the credit facility and the Company had $908,000,000 aggregate principal amount outstanding thereunder.

(b)	The reduction to costs capitalized subsequent to acquisition primarily include impairment charges, property dispositions and other adjustments.

(c)	The aggregated cost for federal income tax purposes is approximately $3,138,568,000 (unaudited).

(d)	The Company’s assets are depreciated or amortized using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the assets by class. Generally, buildings and improvements are depreciated over 15-40 years and tenant improvements are depreciated over the shorter of lease term or expected useful life.

(e)	As of December 31, 2019, the property was under construction; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.

S-6

---

Table of Contents

NOTES TO SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2019

(in thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019				2018				2017
Real Estate:
Balance at beginning of year	$	1,758,326			$	1,551,194			$	915,521
Additions:
Acquisitions	1,151,827				195,328				601,546
Improvements	15,084				11,804				34,127
Deductions:
Impairment	(25,501		)		—				—
Dispositions	(2,807		)		—				—
Other adjustments	(163		)		—				—
Balance at end of year	$	2,896,766			$	1,758,326			$	1,551,194
Accumulated Depreciation:
Balance at beginning of year	$	(84,594	)		$	(45,789	)		$	(18,521	)
Additions:
Depreciation	(48,215		)		(38,805		)		(27,268		)
Deductions:
Impairment	4,501				—				—
Dispositions	4				—				—
Balance at end of year	$	(128,304	)		$	(84,594	)		$	(45,789	)

S-7

---

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

Pursuant to Item 601(a)(2) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit Index immediately precedes the signature page.

The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K).

Exhibit No:
2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April  11, 2019, by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc., Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP, Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP and Lightning Merger Sub, LLC (included as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on April 11, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
2.2		Partnership Interest Purchase Agreement, by and between Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC and Carter/Validus Advisors, LLC, effective as of October 4, 2019 (included as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on October 8, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
2.3		Contribution Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2019, by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, LLC (f/k/a Lightning Merger Sub, LLC), Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC, Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP and CVOP Partner, LLC (included as Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on October 8, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1		Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc. (included as Exhibit 3.1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-191706) filed June 12, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc. (included as Exhibit 3.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-191706) filed May 9, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.3		Articles Supplementary of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., filed on January 13, 2017 (included as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on January 18, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.4		Articles Supplementary of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., filed on June 2, 2017 (included as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on June 6, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference.
3.5		Articles of Amendment of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., filed on August 18, 2017 (included as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on August 22, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.6		Certificate of Correction to the Articles Supplementary of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc. (included as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on July 2, 2018, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.7		Articles of Amendment of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., dated December 12, 2019 (included as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on December 12, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1		Subscription Agreement and Subscription Agreement Signature Page (included as Appendix B to the prospectus, incorporated by reference to the Registrant's final prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3), filed on November 27, 2017 (File No. 333-217579)).
4.2		Additional Subscription Agreement and Subscription Agreement Signature Page (included as Appendix C to the prospectus. incorporated by reference to the Registrant's final prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3), filed on November 27. 2017 (File No. 333-217579)).
4.3		Automatic Purchase Program Enrollment Form (included as Appendix D to the prospectus, incorporated by reference to the Registrant's final prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3), filed on November 27, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.4		Third Amended and Restated Distribution Reinvestment Plan (included as Appendix E to the prospectus attached to Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-191706) filed on January 20, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference).

---

Table of Contents

4.5		Fourth Amended and Restated Distribution Reinvestment Plan (included in the prospectus that is part of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-220940), filed on December 6, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.6		Form of Multi-Product Subscription Agreement (included as Appendix F to the prospectus, incorporated by reference to the Registrant's final prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3), filed on February 10, 2017 (File No. 333-191706)).
4.7*		Description of Capital Stock Registered Under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
10.1		First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, by and among Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, as Borrower, Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., KeyBank National Association, the guarantors and other lenders party thereto, and KeyBank National Association, as Agent, dated January 29, 2019 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on February 4, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2		Third Amended and Restated REIT II Advisory Agreement, dated as of April  11, 2019, by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP, Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP and Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on April 11, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3		Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, dated as of April  11, 2019, by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP and Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC (included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on April 11, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4		Consent and Second Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, by and among Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, as Borrower, Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., KeyBank National Association, the guarantors and other lenders party thereto, and KeyBank National Association, as Agent , dated April 11, 2019 (included as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on April 11, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5		Commitment Letter, dated April 11, 2019 (included as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on April 11, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6		Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Facility Agreement, dated August 7, 2019 by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc, as Borrower, KeyBank National Association, the other lenders which are parties to this agreement and other lenders that may become parties to this agreement, Capital One, National Association, BBVA USA, an Alabama Banking Corporation f/k/a Compass Bank and Suntrust Bank, as Co-Syndication Agents and Keybanc Capital Markets, Inc., BBVA USA, an Alabama Banking Corporation, Capital One, National Association, and Suntrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., as Sole Bookrunner and Fifth Third Bank and Hancock Bank, as Co-Documentation Agents (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A (File No. 000-55435) filed on August 13, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.7		Fourth Amended and Restated Contribution Agreement, dated August 7, 2019 by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., the Borrower, Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, Inc. and its Subsidiary Guarantors, collectively the Initial Guarantors, and each additional guarantor that may hereafter become a party to this agreement (included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A (File No. 000-55435) filed on August 13, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.8		Fourth Amended and Restated Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and Performance, dated August 7, 2019, from Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, et al for the benefit of KeyBank National Association (included as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A (File No. 000-55435) filed on August 13, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.9		Fourth Amended and Restated Subordination of Advisory Fees, dated August 7, 2019, by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., the Borrower, Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP and KeyBank National Association, as Agent (included as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A (File No. 000-55435) filed on August 13, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).

---

Table of Contents

10.10		Term Loan Agreement, dated August 7, 2019 by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., as Borrower, KeyBank National Association, the other lenders which are parties to this agreement and other lenders that may become parties to this agreement, KeyBank National Association, as Agent, BBVA USA, an Alabama Banking Corporation, BMO Capital Markets, Capital One, National Association and Suntrust Bank,, as Co-Syndication Agents and Keybanc Capital Markets, Inc., BMO Capital Markets, BBVA USA, an Alabama Banking Corporation, Capital One, National Association, and Suntrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., as Sole Bookrunner and BMO Harris Bank, N.A. and Fifth Third Bank, as Co-Documentation Agents (included as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A (File No. 000-55435) filed on August 13, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.11		Contribution Agreement (Term Loan), dated August 7, 2019 by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., the Borrower, Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, Inc. and its Subsidiary Guarantors, collectively the Initial Guarantors, and each additional guarantor that may hereafter become a party to this agreement (included as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A (File No. 000-55435) filed on August 13, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.12		Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and Performance (Term Loan), dated August 7, 2019, from Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, et al for the benefit of KeyBank National Association (included as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A (File No. 000-55435) filed on August 13, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.13		Subordination of Advisory Fees (Term Loan), dated August 7, 2019, by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., the Borrower, Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP and KeyBank National Association, as Agent (included as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A(File No. 000-55435) filed on August 13, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.14		Joinder Agreement (Master Credit Facility), dated September 4, 2019, by HCII-NORTH DURANGO DRIVE, LLC, HCII-7375 CYPRESS GARDENS BOULEVARD, LLC, HCII-718 ELIZABETH STREET, LLC and HCII-3412 MARKET PLACE AVENUE, LLC, to KeyBank National Association, as Agent (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on September 9, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.15		Joinder Agreement (Term Loan), dated September 4, 2019, by HCII-NORTH DURANGO DRIVE, LLC, HCII-7375 CYPRESS GARDENS BOULEVARD, LLC, HCII-718 ELIZABETH STREET, LLC and HCII-3412 MARKET PLACE AVENUE, LLC, to KeyBank National Association, as Agent (included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on September 9, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.16		First Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2019, by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP and Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on October 8, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.17		Fourth Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2019, by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP and Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC (included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on October 8, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.18		Sixth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, dated as of October 3, 2019, by and between Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc. and Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC (included as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on October 8, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.19		Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, dated as of October 4, 2019, by and between Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, LLC (f/k/a Lightning Merger Sub, LLC) and Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC (included as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on October 8, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.20		Omnibus Assignment and Amendment to the Property Management and Leasing Agreements of the Entities Listed on Exhibit A, entered into as of October 4, 2019, by and among Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services, LLC and Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC (included as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on October 8, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).

---

Table of Contents

10.21		First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP, entered into as of October 4, 2019, by and between Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP and CVOP Partner, LLC (included as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on October 8, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.22		First Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Facility Agreement, dated October 3, 2019, by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc, as Borrower, KeyBank National Association, the other lenders which are parties to this agreement and other lenders that may become parties to this agreement, Capital One, National Association, BBVA USA, an Alabama Banking Corporation f/k/a Compass Bank and Suntrust Bank, as Co-Syndication Agents and Keybanc Capital Markets, Inc., BBVA USA, an Alabama Banking Corporation, Capital One, National Association, and Suntrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., as Sole Bookrunner and Fifth Third Bank and Hancock Bank, as Co-Documentation Agents (included as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on October 8, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.23		First Amendment to Term Loan Agreement, dated October 3, 2019, by and among Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., as Borrower, KeyBank National Association, the other lenders which are parties to this agreement and other lenders that may become parties to this agreement, KeyBank National Association, as Agent, BBVA USA, an Alabama Banking Corporation, BMO Capital Markets, Capital One, National Association and Suntrust Bank,, as Co-Syndication Agents and Keybanc Capital Markets, Inc., BMO Capital Markets, BBVA USA, an Alabama Banking Corporation, Capital One, National Association, and Suntrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., as Sole Bookrunner and BMO Harris Bank, N.A. and Fifth Third Bank, as Co-Documentation Agents (included as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on October 8, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.24		Joinder Agreement (Master Credit Agreement), dated October 4, 2019, by Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP and Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, LLC, to KeyBank National Association, as Agent (included as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on October 8, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.25		Joinder Agreement (Term Loan), dated October 4, 2019, by Carter/Validus Operating Partnership, LP and Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, LLC, to KeyBank National Association, as Agent (included as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on October 8, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.26		Amended and Restated 2014 Restricted Share Plan (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on March 10, 2020, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.27		Restricted Stock Award Agreement (included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on March 10, 2020, and incorporated herein by reference).
23.1*		Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1**		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2**		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1*		Consent of Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc.
99.2		Sixth Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Program (included as Exhibit 99.5 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on April 11, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
99.3		Share Repurchase Program (included as Exhibit 99.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55435) filed on October 4, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

---

Table of Contents

101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*	Filed herewith.
**	Furnished herewith in accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

---

Table of Contents

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

The Company has elected not to provide summary information.

---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

			CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT II, INC.
			(Registrant)
Date: March 27, 2020		By:	/s/    MICHAEL A. SETON
			Michael A. Seton
			Chief Executive Officer
			(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 27, 2020		By:	/s/    KAY C. NEELY
			Kay C. Neely
			Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name		Capacity		Date
/s/    MICHAEL A. SETON		Chief Executive Officer, President		March 27, 2020
Michael A. Seton		(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/    KAY C. NEELY		Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer		March 27, 2020
Kay C. Neely		(Principal Financial Officer and
		Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/    JOHN E. CARTER		Chairman of the Board of Directors		March 27, 2020
John E. Carter
/s/    ROBERT M. WINSLOW		Director		March 27, 2020
Robert M. Winslow
/s/    JONATHAN KUCHIN		Director		March 27, 2020
Jonathan Kuchin
/s/    RANDALL GREENE		Director		March 27, 2020
Randall Greene
/s/    RONALD RAYEVICH		Director		March 27, 2020
Ronald Rayevich
/s/    ROGER PRATT		Director		March 27, 2020
Roger Pratt