UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
____________________________

FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  
For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-35039
THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Bermuda
 
98-1039994
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

The Waterfront, Chesney House
96 Pitts Bay Road
Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda
+1 441 542-3300
(Address, including Zip Code and Telephone Number, including Area Code of Registrant’s Principal Executive Office)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Shares, $0.10 par value
 
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes     ¨     No     x
    
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes     ¨     No     x

Note - Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes     x     No     ¨
    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes     x     No     ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.                 
Yes     x     No     ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
¨
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer (do not check if a smaller reporting company)
x
Smaller reporting company
¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).                                     
                        Yes     ¨     No     x
The registrant’s common shares began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on August 15, 2013. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2013, there was no public trading market for the registrant's common shares.
As of February 27, 2014 there were 103,921,772 common shares of the registrant’s common shares issued and outstanding, including 657,156 restricted shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III incorporates information from certain portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.




Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
INDEX
 
Page
      SIGNATURES
 
 



INTRODUCTORY NOTE
Unless the context otherwise indicates or requires, as used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K references to “we,” “our,” “us,” and the “Company,” refer to Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. and its directly and indirectly owned subsidiaries, including Third Point Reinsurance Company Ltd. (“Third Point Re”), as a combined entity, except where otherwise stated or where it is clear that the terms mean only Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. exclusive of its subsidiaries. We refer to Third Point Reinsurance Investment Management Ltd. as the “Catastrophe Fund Manager,” Third Point Reinsurance Opportunities Fund Ltd. as the “Catastrophe Fund” and Third Point Re Cat Ltd. as the “Catastrophe Reinsurer,” “fiscal,” when used in reference to any twelve-month period ended December 31, refers to our fiscal years ended December 31. Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this Annual Report is as of December 31, 2013. We have made rounding adjustments to reach some of the figures included in this Annual Report and, unless otherwise indicated, percentages presented in this Annual Report are approximate.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained or incorporated in this Annual Report include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding our industry, business strategy, plans, goals and expectations concerning our market position, international expansion, future operations, margins, profitability, future efficiencies, capital expenditures, liquidity and capital resources and other financial and operating information. When used in this discussion, the words “may,” “believes,” “intends,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “estimates,” “expects,” “should,” “assumes,” “continues,” “could,” “will,” “future” and the negative of these or similar terms and phrases are intended to identify forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations regarding future events, results or outcomes. These expectations may or may not be realized. Although we believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give you no assurance these expectations will prove to have been correct. Some of these expectations may be based upon assumptions, data or judgments that prove to be incorrect. Actual events, results and outcomes may differ materially from our expectations due to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors. Although it is not possible to identify all of these risks and factors, they include, among others, the following:
limited historical information about us;

operational structure currently is being developed;

fluctuation in results of operations;

more established competitors;

losses exceeding reserves;

downgrades or withdrawal of ratings by rating agencies;

dependence on key executives;

dependence on letter of credit facilities that may not be available on commercially acceptable terms;

potential inability to pay dividends;

unavailability of capital in the future;

dependence on clients’ evaluations of risks associated with such clients’ insurance underwriting;


1



suspension or revocation of our reinsurance license;

potentially being deemed an investment company under U.S. federal securities law;

potential characterization of Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. and/or Third Point Reinsurance Company Ltd. as a PFIC;

dependence on Third Point LLC to implement our investment strategy;

termination by Third Point LLC of our investment management agreement;

risks associated with our investment strategy being greater than those faced by competitors;

increased regulation or scrutiny of alternative investment advisers affecting our reputation;

potentially becoming subject to United States federal income taxation;

potentially becoming subject to U.S. withholding and information reporting requirements under the FATCA provisions;

other risks and factors listed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Any one of these factors or a combination of these factors could materially affect our financial condition or future results of operations and could influence whether any forward-looking statements contained in this report ultimately prove to be accurate. Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and you should not place undue reliance on them. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made and we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
In addition, while we do, from time to time, communicate with security analysts, it is against our policy to disclose to them any material non-public information or other confidential information. Accordingly, shareholders should not assume that we agree with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of the statement or report. Thus, to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections, forecasts, or opinions, such reports are not our responsibility.
PART I.
Item 1. Business
Overview
We are a Bermuda-based property and casualty reinsurer with a reinsurance and investment strategy that we believe differentiates us from our competitors. Our goal is to deliver attractive equity returns to shareholders by combining profitable reinsurance underwriting with superior investment management provided by Third Point LLC, our investment manager.
Our reinsurance strategy is to be highly opportunistic and disciplined. During periods of extremely competitive or soft reinsurance market conditions we intend to be selective with regard to the amount and type of reinsurance we write and conserve our risk-taking capital for periods when market conditions are more favorable to us from a pricing perspective.
Substantially all of our investable assets are managed by our investment manager, Third Point LLC, which is wholly owned by Daniel S. Loeb, one of our founding shareholders. Third Point LLC is an SEC-registered investment adviser headquartered in New York, managing $13.9 billion in assets as of December 31, 2013. We directly own our

2



investments, which are held in a separate account and are managed by Third Point LLC on substantially the same basis as its main hedge funds, including Third Point Partners L.P., the original Third Point LLC hedge fund.
We were incorporated on October 6, 2011 and completed our initial capitalization transaction on December 22, 2011 with $784.3 million of equity capital, and commenced underwriting business on January 1, 2012. In January 2012, we received an A- (Excellent) financial strength rating from A.M. Best Company, Inc., or A.M. Best.
On August 20, 2013, we completed an initial public offering (“IPO”) of 24,832,484 common shares at an offering price of $12.50 per share. The net proceeds to us of the offering were $286.0 million, after deducting offering costs. Our common shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “TPRE”.
Our management team is led by John R. Berger, a highly-respected reinsurance industry veteran with over 30 years of experience, the majority of which was spent as the principal executive officer of three successful reinsurance companies. In addition, we have recruited a management team around Mr. Berger that also has significant senior leadership and underwriting experience in the reinsurance industry. We believe that our experience and longstanding relationships with our insurance company clients, senior reinsurance brokers, insurance regulators and credit rating agencies are an important competitive advantage.
For the year ended December 31, 2013, we generated net income of $227.3 million , which represented a return on beginning shareholders’ equity attributable to shareholders, adjusted for the IPO proceeds, of 23.4% . For 2013 our gross premiums written totaled $401.9 million , and earned premiums totaled $220.7 million . For the same period our net investment income totaled $ 253.2 million , reflecting net returns of 23.9% on our investments managed by Third Point LLC. Our combined ratio for our property and casualty reinsurance segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 was 107.5% reflective of lower crop losses in 2013 compared to 2012 and a decrease in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of earned premium compared to the prior year. As of December 31, 2013, we had shareholders’ equity attributable to shareholders of $ 1,391.7 million .
Segment Information
Under U.S. GAAP, operating segments are based on the internal information that management uses for allocating resources and assessing performance as the source of our reportable segments. We report two operating segments - Property and Casualty Reinsurance and Catastrophe Risk Management. We have also identified a corporate function that includes our investment results and certain general and administrative expenses related to corporate activities. For more information, see Note 22 of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Reinsurance Strategy
Our reinsurance strategy is to build a portfolio that generates stable underwriting profits, with margins commensurate with the amount of risk assumed, by opportunistically targeting sub-sectors of the market and specific situations where reinsurance capacity and alternatives may be constrained. Our management team has differentiated expertise that allows us to identify profitable reinsurance opportunities. The level of volatility in our reinsurance portfolio will be determined by market conditions but will typically be lower than that of most other reinsurance companies. We manage reinsurance volatility by focusing on lines of business that have historically demonstrated more stable return characteristics, such as limited catastrophe exposed property, which we refer to as “property quota share”, auto, workers compensation quota share, and certain segments of multi-line specialty and crop. These lines of business are often characterized as having exposure to higher frequency and lower severity claims activity. We seek to further manage the volatility of our reinsurance results by writing reinsurance contracts on a quota share basis, where we assume an agreed percentage of premiums and losses for a portfolio of insurance policies. We also make use of contractual terms and conditions within our reinsurance contracts that include individual or aggregate loss occurrence limits, which limit the dollar amount of loss that we can incur from a particular occurrence or series of occurrences within the term of a reinsurance contract; loss ratio caps, which limit the maximum loss we can incur pursuant to a contract to a defined loss ratio; sliding scale commissions that vary in accordance with the client’s performance; and sub-limits and exclusions for specific risks not covered by a particular reinsurance contract.

3



We also write reinsurance contracts that provide protection against adverse development on loss reserves where we provide an incremental amount of additional coverage limit, usually less than 25%, of the total reserves. We typically provide coverage where we agree with the client's reserving practices and reserve levels or where we believe there are structural or contractual safeguards in place. While these transactions are usually booked at or close to a 100% composite ratio (combined ratio before general and administrative expenses) and therefore do not initially generate underwriting income, they produce premiums equal to the reserves at the inception of the contract. In some instances, the level of risk in the reserve cover contract or the risk mitigating features within the contract including limitations on the amount and timing of loss payments require us to account for the reserve cover as a deposit contract. Using the deposit method of accounting, a deposit liability, rather than written premium, is initially recorded based upon the consideration received less any explicitly identified premiums or fees. In subsequent periods, the deposit liability is adjusted by calculating the effective yield on the deposit to reflect actual payments to date and future expected payments.
We typically write larger customized reinsurance contracts that require significant interaction during the course of negotiations between the client, intermediaries and us. We take a lead underwriting position on most of our reinsurance contracts, meaning that we establish the pricing and terms and conditions of the reinsurance contract. In certain instances, we will follow terms and conditions established by our competitors if we believe the opportunity meets our return hurdles and helps us balance our reinsurance portfolio.
Our property and casualty reinsurance operations generate excess cash flows, or float, which we track in managing our business. We believe that continuing to seek net investment income from float is a key part of our reinsurance strategy and an important consideration in evaluating the overall contribution of our property and casualty reinsurance operations to our consolidated results.
For the year ended December 31, 2013, three contracts individually contributed more than 10% of our gross premiums written. These three contracts contributed 14.9%, 11.2% and 10.5%, respectively, of total gross premiums written for the year ended December 31, 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2012, three contracts individually contributed more than 10% of total gross premiums written. These three contracts contributed 22.3%, 20.0% and 11.8%, respectively, of total gross premiums written for the year ended December 31, 2012. As we expand our business over time, we expect that the proportion of total gross premiums written represented by individual contracts will decline. Under current market conditions, we focus primarily on writing quota share agreements pursuant to which we assume an agreed percentage of premiums and losses for a portfolio of insurance policies.
We intend to grow our book by underwriting a mix of short to medium tail personal lines and commercial lines. We intend to increase our geographic spread over time by adding reinsurance programs from Europe, Asia and other regions; however, we expect that a majority of our reinsurance business will continue to be composed of U.S. exposure.
Most of our clients buy reinsurance from us for capital management purposes, primarily to increase their capacity to write insurance premium and maintain or improve their credit ratings. The most common form of reinsurance used for this purpose is quota share reinsurance. Many of the clients that buy these contracts are growing as a result of securing primary rate increases and an increase in the number of policies they write. Because quota share reinsurance typically includes structural and contractual features that limit the amount of risk assumed by the reinsurer, it therefore carries relatively lower expected margins than excess of loss reinsurance and other more volatile forms of reinsurance. During periods of less favorable market conditions, margins on quota share reinsurance written for the capital management purposes of our clients typically remain stable and are sufficient to support our business plan. As market conditions improve, we may expand the lines of business and forms of reinsurance on which we focus to increase our risk-adjusted returns.
In contrast to many reinsurers with whom we compete, we have elected to limit our underwriting of property catastrophe exposures and write excess of loss catastrophe reinsurance through the Catastrophe Fund, which is a separately capitalized reinsurance fund vehicle. We established the Catastrophe Fund, the Catastrophe Fund Manager and the Catastrophe Reinsurer on June 15, 2012, in partnership with Hiscox Insurance Company (Bermuda) Limited, or Hiscox. Our investment in and management of the Catastrophe Fund allow us to provide a product that is critical to most of our reinsurance clients and to earn fee income over time. Because the Catastrophe Fund is capitalized in part

4



by investments from unrelated parties, our financial exposure to the higher volatility and liquidity risks associated with property catastrophe losses is limited to our investment in the Catastrophe Fund, which as of December 31, 2013 was $54.8 million. As there are no additional guarantees or recourse to us beyond this investment, we anticipate that our property catastrophe exposures will consistently remain relatively low when compared to our competitors.
The following table provides a breakdown by line of business of gross premiums written for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
 
2013
 
2012
 
Amount
 
Percentage of Total
 
Amount
 
Percentage of Total
 
($ in thousands)
Property and Casualty Reinsurance Segment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
$
67,612

 
16.8
%
 
$
103,174

 
54.2
%
Casualty
210,017

 
52.2
%
 
44,700

 
23.5
%
Specialty
115,959

 
28.9
%
 
42,500

 
22.3
%
 
393,588

 
97.9
%
 
190,374

 
100.0
%
Catastrophe Risk Management Segment
8,349

 
2.1
%
 

 
%
Total
$
401,937

 
100.0
%
 
$
190,374

 
100.0
%
Investment Strategy
Our investment strategy distinguishes us from most other reinsurers, who typically concentrate their investment portfolios on long-only, investment grade, shorter-term, fixed income securities. As implemented by our investment manager, Third Point LLC, our investment strategy is intended to achieve superior risk-adjusted returns by deploying capital in both long and short investments with favorable risk/reward characteristics across select asset classes, sectors and geographies. Third Point LLC identifies investment opportunities via a bottom-up, value-oriented approach to single security analysis supplemented by a top-down view of portfolio and risk management. Third Point LLC seeks dislocations in certain areas of the capital markets or in the pricing of particular securities and supplements single security analysis with an approach to portfolio construction that includes sizing each investment based on upside/downside calculations, all with a view towards appropriately positioning and managing overall exposures. Dislocations in capital markets refer to any major movements in prices of the capital markets as a whole, certain segments of the market, or a specific security. If Third Point LLC has what it considers to be a differentiated view from the perceived market sentiment with respect to such movement, Third Point LLC may trade securities in our investment account based on that differentiated view. If the ultimate market reaction with respect to the event or movement ultimately proves to be closer to Third Point LLC’s original viewpoint, we may have investment gains in our investment portfolio as a result of the shift in market sentiment. Through our investment manager, Third Point LLC, we make investments globally, in both developed and emerging markets, in all sectors, and in equity, credit, commodity, currency, options and other instruments.
Third Point LLC has historically favored event-driven situations, in which it believes that a catalyst, either intrinsic or extrinsic, will unlock value or alter the lens through which the greater market values a particular investment. Third Point LLC attempts to apply this event framework to each of its single security investments and this approach informs the timing and risk of each investment. For additional detail regarding Third Point LLC’s investment strategy and event-driven framework utilized in managing our investment portfolio, please refer to the expanded description under “Investments-Investment Strategies.”
As our investment manager, Third Point LLC has the contractual right to manage substantially all of our investable assets pursuant to an investment management agreement that has an initial term expiring on December 22, 2016, subject to automatic renewal for additional successive three-year terms unless a party notifies the other parties of its intention to terminate at least six months prior to the end of a term. Third Point LLC is required to follow our investment guidelines and to act in a manner that is fair and equitable in allocating investment opportunities to us.

5



However, it is not otherwise restricted with respect to the nature or timing of making investments for our account. Our investment guidelines require Third Point LLC to manage our investment portfolio on a substantially equivalent basis to its main funds; but in any event to keep at least 60% of the investment portfolio in debt and equity securities, cash, cash equivalents or precious metals; limit single position concentration to no more than 15% of the portfolio assets managed; and limit net exposure to no greater than 1.5 times portfolio assets managed for more than 10 trading days in any 30-day period. Net exposure represents the short exposure subtracted from the long exposure in a given category. We have the contractual right to withdraw funds from our managed account to pay claims and expenses as needed. The net increase in the value of our investment portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2013 was 23.9% compared to 17.7% for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Property and Casualty Segment Products
Our underwriting team has extensive experience in underwriting many forms of property and casualty reinsurance products.  In the current market, which we categorize as being highly competitive, our focus will continue to be on property and casualty quota share treaties that offer stable returns. We have also considered and written programs such as loss portfolio transfers and other forms of reserve covers where we are able to leverage our investment capabilities. Expected margins on quota share reinsurance written for capital management purposes of our clients are typically smaller but, remain relatively stable and are sufficient to support our business plan even during periods of less favorable market conditions such as those being experienced currently. We believe there is less competition on reserve covers as expected investment returns on investable assets backing reserves is very low for most traditional reinsurers in the current interest rate environment. Margins on this business are determined through bilateral negotiations and comparison of the cost of the reserve cover to non-reinsurance solutions such as raising additional equity or debt capital. As market conditions improve, we may expand the lines of business and forms of reinsurance on which we focus to increase our risk-adjusted returns.
While we expect to establish a diversified portfolio, our allocation of risk will vary based on our perception of the opportunities available in each line of business. Moreover, our focus on certain lines will fluctuate based upon market conditions and we may only offer or underwrite a limited range of lines in any given period. We intend to:
target markets where capacity and alternatives are underserved or capacity constrained;
employ strict underwriting discipline;
select reinsurance opportunities with favorable economics over the life of the contract; and
potentially offer lines that are not identified in this Form 10-K.
Through December 31, 2013, we wrote reinsurance contracts covering the following product lines:
Personal Automobile Insurance. Personal automobile insurance is purchased for individually owned or leased cars designed to provide the insured with financial protection against bodily injury or physical damage resulting from traffic accidents and against liability that could arise from such occurrences. In addition, automobile insurance may offer financial protection against theft or damage of the vehicle from incidents other than collisions. Each state has different rules and regulations in place for compulsory coverage and the specific terms of automobile insurance policies will vary from company to company. Third Point Re generally focuses on providing proportional reinsurance to small, single state and regional carriers that specialize in minimum financial responsibility limits required by their respective states. This business is often referred to as “non-standard” automobile business and was historically overlooked by standard markets. More recently, however, standard companies have expanded their appetite for such business and it is written by a broad range of carriers. Reinsurance contracts covering personal automobile insurance are included in the casualty line of business.
Workers Compensation Insurance . Workers compensation insurance provides wage replacement and medical benefits to employees injured in the course of employment in exchange for the mandatory relinquishment of the employee’s right to sue the employer for negligence. While plans differ among jurisdictions, provisions can be made for payments in place of wages (functioning as a form of disability insurance), compensation for economic loss (past and future), reimbursement or payment of medical and like expenses (functioning as a form of health insurance), and

6



benefits payable to dependents of workers killed during employment (functioning as a form of life reinsurance). General damages for pain and suffering and punitive damages for employer negligence are not generally available in workers compensation plans. Our approach to workers compensation is very selective and targets insurance companies that are very specialized within the workers compensation line and geographically focused. We limit the volatility of this line of business by capping our per occurrence exposures. Reinsurance contracts covering workers compensation insurance are included in the casualty line of business.
Homeowners’ Insurance. Homeowners’ insurance coverage combines various personal insurance protections, which can include losses occurring to one’s home, their contents, loss of use (including additional living expenses), or loss of other personal possessions of the homeowner, as well as liability insurance for accidents that may happen at covered homes or at the hands of the homeowners. Third Point Re provides quota share reinsurance which limits the amount of catastrophic losses that can be recovered; in many cases, hurricanes and other serious natural events are excluded totally. There are also often other loss sensitive features that vary the cost of the reinsurance as results improve or deteriorate, buffering the potential volatility to us. Reinsurance contracts covering homeowners' insurance are included in the property line of business.
Crop Insurance . Crop insurance on growing crops in the United States provides protection to farmers for crop losses caused by weather, disease, and insects. Two types of policies are available. Multiple peril crop insurance, or MPCI, is subsidized by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and covers most natural perils. Additionally, farmers can purchase single peril policies such as hail insurance. These products are not subsidized and the farmer pays the entire premium. Other single peril policies cover the perils such as wind, freeze, and excess rain. We predominantly support MPCI business. As of December 31, 2013, the majority of our crop portfolio is multiple-peril and written on a quota share basis. Reinsurance contracts covering crop insurance are included in the specialty line of business.
Mortgage Insurance. Mortgage insurance is an insurance policy which compensates lenders or investors for losses due to the default of a mortgage loan. Mortgage insurance can refer to private mortgage insurance (“PMI”), mortgage life insurance or mortgage title insurance. Third Point Re focuses on PMI. PMI is normally required by lenders when a borrower’s down payment or equity is less than 20% of the loan value. Not all lenders will require PMI but those that follow the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines for home loan approval require PMI. Reinsurance contracts covering mortgage insurance are included in the specialty line of business.
Multi-line reinsurance. Multi-line reinsurance is reinsurance of an underlying portfolio of several different types of insurance risks. Third Point Re focuses on multi-line reinsurance opportunities where it has expertise in the underlying lines of business or where the terms and conditions of the reinsurance contract minimize the volatility of the more difficult to analyze classes of business in the portfolio. Multi-line reinsurance contracts are included in the specialty line of business.
Marketing
The majority of our business is sourced through reinsurance brokers. Broker distribution channels provide us with access to an efficient, variable cost, global distribution system without the significant time and expense that would be incurred in creating a wholly-owned distribution network. We believe that our financial strength rating, unencumbered balance sheet, well known and respected management team, and responsive client service are enhancing our working relationships with clients and brokers.
Our objective is to build long-term relationships with senior individuals at reinsurance brokers and with our clients. We meet frequently in Bermuda and London with brokers, senior representatives of existing clients and prospective clients, and encourage client visits to our executive offices in Bermuda in order to help distinguish us and to develop mutually beneficial understandings of our respective businesses. As evidenced by rates of submission flow, open dialogue, and successful closing of targeted accounts, we believe we have successfully leveraged the underwriting experience and relationships of our management team. Reinsurance brokers receive a brokerage commission that is usually a percentage of gross premiums written. We seek to become the first choice of brokers and clients by providing:
creative solutions that address the specific business needs of our clients;
rapid and substantive responses to structuring and pricing quote requests;

7



financial security; and
clear indication of risks we will and will not underwrite.
The following table sets forth our premiums written by brokers or placed directly for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:  
 
2013
 
2012
 

Premiums written  
 
 

% of Total  
 
 

Premiums written  
 
 

% of Total  
 
 
($ in thousands)
Name of broker
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Aon Benfield - a division of Aon plc
$
111,865

 
27.8
%
 
$
22,000

 
11.6
%
Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC
89,125

 
22.2
%
 
65,073

 
34.2
%
Advocate Reinsurance Partners, LLC
57,994

 
14.4
%
 
22,473

 
11.8
%
BMS Intermediaries
46,095

 
11.5
%
 
5,269

 
2.8
%
Other brokers
40,246

 
10.0
%
 
33,059

 
17.4
%
Total broker placed
345,325

 
85.9
%
 
147,874

 
77.8
%
Other
56,612

 
14.1
%
 
42,500

 
22.2
%
 
$
401,937

 
100.0
%
 
$
190,374

 
100.0
%
We believe that the number of brokers with whom we do business will continue to expand over time, and by maintaining close working relationships with brokers, we are able to increase our chances of successfully growing our account and accessing a broader range of potential clients.
Underwriting
We have established a senior team of underwriters and actuaries to develop and manage our reinsurance business. We believe that their experience, industry presence, and long-standing relationships will allow us to tailor our portfolio to specific market segments. Our approach to underwriting will allow us to deploy our capital in a variety of lines of business and to capitalize on opportunities that we believe offer favorable returns on equity over the long term. Our underwriters and actuaries have expertise in a number of lines of business and we will also look to outside consultants to help us with niche areas of expertise when we deem it appropriate. From time to time, we may consider investment income in our underwriting and pricing of a particular transaction.
We generally apply the following underwriting management principles:
Team Approach
Each submission is assigned to an underwriter. If the program meets our underwriting criteria, the actuarial team participates in the process. The underwriter and actuary work in concert to evaluate the opportunity, determine the optimal structure, and price the deal. When capital is committed to any transaction, the evaluation team creates a deal analysis memorandum that highlights the key components of the proposed transaction and presents the proposed transaction to a senior group of staff including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Underwriting Officer and representatives of the underwriting, actuarial and finance teams. This group must agree that the transaction meets or exceeds our profitability requirements before we submit a binding proposal. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Underwriting Officer maintains the exclusive ultimate authority to bind contracts.
Actuarial Pricing
We have developed proprietary actuarial models and also use several commercially available tools to assist in pricing our business. Our analysis considers the data and information provided by the potential cedent as well as relevant industry data, where appropriate. We use this cedent specific and industry data to develop our own point estimate of the expected losses under each potential contract. We also use a stochastic model to simulate a distribution

8



of potential loss outcomes and the impact of any contractual features that may exist such as sliding scale ceding commissions or profit commissions.
One of the key metrics that we consider as a result of this process is the expected combined ratio on a particular transaction. We also consider the projected outcomes at various percentiles, with a specific focus on outcomes in the tail. As a part of this process, we also specifically test each transaction to determine if there is sufficient risk transfer to qualify for reinsurance accounting. The results of this pricing process are shared with the underwriter on a contract, and if a deal is bound summary exhibits are attached to a memo summarizing the actuarial pricing analysis that was performed.
Act as Lead Underwriter
Typically, one or two reinsurers will act as the lead or co-lead markets in developing and negotiating treaty pricing, terms and conditions of reinsurance contracts. We act as the lead underwriter for the majority of the premium that we underwrite. We believe that lead underwriting is a critically important factor in achieving long-term success, as lead underwriters have greater control of overall economics of their programs. In addition, we believe that reinsurers that lead policies are generally solicited for a broader range of business and have greater access to attractive risks.
Alignment of Interests
We seek to ensure that every contract we underwrite aligns our interests with our client’s interest. Specifically, we may seek to:
require our clients to maintain a meaningful risk position in their business;
pay our clients a commission based upon their actual expenses and offer an additional commission as an incentive based upon profitability;
include deficit carry-forward provisions in our multi-year contracts which allows us to potentially offset underwriting losses from one year to the next;
charge the client a premium for reinstatement of the amount of reinsurance coverage to the full amount reduced as a result of a reinsurance loss payment, which we refer to as a reinstatement premium;
require specific levels of rate increases on the underlying insurance policies.
We believe these tools help us align our risk with the risk of the client and provide incentive to clients to manage our mutual interests. We also believe that aligning our interests with our client’s interests promotes profitability, accurate reporting of information, timely settling and management of claims, and limits the potential for disputes. Adjustments to profit commissions and other participating features would be recorded in our financial statements based on our estimate of losses and the contractual provisions of the reinsurance contract.
During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred totaled $ 139.8 million and $80.3 million , respectively. Subsequent adjustments to our loss reserves for these contracts may result in corresponding adjustments to profit commission and other participating features based upon the structure of the contract, the level of losses accounted for in our financial statements and the timing of the subsequent changes. As part of our quarterly reserving process, profit commissions and other participating features are calculated on an individual contract basis. Profit commissions and other participating features are considered probable when our actuarial loss estimate results in estimated profit commission based on the terms of the contract.
 
Underwriting Operations
We currently have five senior executives who comprise our Underwriting Team. The team consists of our Chief Executive Officer/Chief Underwriting Officer, two Executive Vice Presidents, Underwriting and two Senior Vice Presidents, Underwriting. These underwriters have in excess of 25 years of experience, on average, in the reinsurance business. The two Executive Vice Presidents, Underwriting have held the Chief Executive Officer position in former

9



companies. All underwriting activity is performed in Bermuda. The Chief Underwriting Officer has exclusive authority to bind Third Point Re to risk.
Detailed Underwriting Diligence
We employ selective underwriting criteria in the contracts we choose to underwrite and spend a significant amount of time with our clients and brokers to understand the risks and appropriately structure the contracts. We usually obtain significant amounts of data from our clients to conduct a thorough actuarial modeling analysis. As part of our pricing and underwriting process, we assess among other factors:
the client’s and industry historical loss data and current market conditions;
the business purpose served by a proposed contract;
the client’s pricing and underwriting strategies;
the expected duration for claims to fully develop;
the geographic areas in which the client is doing business and its market share;
the reputation and financial strength of the client;
the reputation and expertise of the broker;
proposed contract terms and conditions; and
reports provided by independent industry specialists.
Retrocessional Coverage
Retrocessional coverage consists of reinsurance purchased to cover a portion of the risks that we reinsure on behalf of our clients. We purchased retrocessional coverage in 2013, and we may continue to do so in the future. From time to time, we consider purchases of retrocessional coverage for one or more of the following reasons: to manage our overall exposure, to reduce our net liability on individual risks, to obtain additional underwriting capacity and to balance our underwriting portfolio. Additionally, retrocession can be used as a mechanism to share the risks and rewards of business written and therefore can be used as a tool to align our interests with those of our counterparties. We currently have coverage that provides for recovery of a portion of loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred on one crop contract. Loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable from the retrocessionaires are recorded as assets. For the year ended December 31, 2013, loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred reported on our consolidated statement of income are net of loss and loss expenses recovered of $9.3 million. Retrocession contracts do not relieve us from our obligations to the insureds. Failure of retrocessionaires to honor their obligations could result in losses to us. As of December 31, 2013, we had loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable of $9.3 million with one retrocessionaire who was rated “A (Excellent)” by A.M. Best. We regularly evaluate the financial condition of our retrocessionaires to assess the ability of the retrocessionaires to honor their obligations.
Claims Management
Our claims management process begins upon receipt of reports from our clients. These statements are reviewed on an individual basis, evaluated against company expectations and entered in our management system for portfolio analysis and reporting purposes. In addition to analyzing report statements and results, claims audits are performed on specific contracts based on results and management direction to ensure the clients are reporting and reserving their claims accurately and appropriately.  
Reserves
On a quarterly basis, our actuaries produce an actuarial central estimate of the gross and net loss reserves for all contracts bound as of the evaluation date. The reserves are calculated on an undiscounted basis with regards to future investment income. The projections also include estimates of loss-sensitive contingent terms such as profit commissions

10



and sliding scale ceding commissions. All calculations are done on a contract-by-contract basis and reflect the most recent premium and loss information provided by our cedents.
In estimating our reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, it is necessary to project future loss and loss adjustment expense payments. It is certain that actual future losses and loss adjustment expenses will not develop exactly as projected and may, in fact, significantly vary from the projections. Further, the projections make no provision for extraordinary future emergence of new classes of losses or types of losses not sufficiently represented in our or the applicable cedent’s historical database or which are not yet quantifiable.
The following table represents the activity in the loss and loss adjustment expense reserves for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
 
2013
 
2012
 
($ in thousands)
Gross reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses, beginning of year
$
67,271

 
$

Less: loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable, beginning of year

 

Net reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses, beginning of year
67,271

 

Increase (decrease) in net loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred in respect of losses occurring in:
 
 
 
     Current year
144,509

 
80,306

     Prior years'
(4,697
)
 

Total incurred loss and loss adjustment expenses
139,812

 
80,306

Net loss and loss adjustment expenses paid in respect of losses occurring in:
 
 
 
     Current year
(27,528
)
 
(13,035
)
     Prior years'
(54,501
)
 

Total net paid losses
(82,029
)
 
(13,035
)
Net reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses, end of year
125,054

 
67,271

Plus: loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable, end of year
9,277

 

Gross reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses, end of year
$
134,331

 
$
67,271


The $4.7 million decrease in prior years’ reserves reflects $1.3 million of favorable loss experience on several contracts and $3.4 million related to premium estimate decreases, primarily related to one crop contract. The reduction in loss and loss adjustment expense reserves related to premium estimates was accompanied by an equal decrease in the premium written and earned for that contract, resulting in a minimal impact to net underwriting income.
Collateral Arrangement/ Letter of Credit Facility
We are not licensed or admitted as an insurer in any jurisdiction other than Bermuda. Many jurisdictions such as the United States do not permit clients to take credit for reinsurance on their statutory financial statements if such reinsurance is obtained from unlicensed or non-admitted insurers without appropriate collateral. As a result, we anticipate that all of our U.S. clients and a portion of our non-U.S. clients will require us to provide collateral for the contracts we bind with them. We expect this collateral to take the form of funds withheld, trust arrangements or letters of credit. We had in place letter of credit facilities from Citibank, N.A., BNP Paribas and J.P. Morgan in a maximum aggregate amount of $300 million , as of December 31, 2013 and have issued letters of credit totaling $ 127.3 million in favor of clients. The failure to maintain, replace or increase our letter of credit facility on commercially acceptable terms may significantly and negatively affect our ability to implement our business strategy. See “Risk Factors-Risks Relating to Our Business-Our failure to obtain sufficient letter of credit facilities or to increase our letter of credit capacity on commercially acceptable terms as we grow could significantly and negatively affect our ability to implement our business strategy.”

11



Competition
The reinsurance industry is highly competitive. We expect to compete with major reinsurers, most of which are well established, have a significant operating history and strong financial strength ratings and have developed long-standing client relationships.
Although we seek to provide coverage where capacity and alternatives are limited, we directly compete with larger companies due to the breadth of their coverage across the property and casualty market in substantially all lines of business. We also compete with smaller companies and other niche reinsurers. While we have a limited operating history, we believe that our unique approach to underwriting and broad relationships will allow us to be successful in underwriting transactions against more established competitors.
Risk Management
We have developed a comprehensive risk management strategy that is governed by an articulated vision of risk appetite and control that is conveyed throughout the organization and measured in a transparent and consistent manner. Our risk management strategy, metrics and progress are summarized in a report that is presented to the board of directors on a quarterly basis. Our internal capital model incorporates statistics from the pricing, reserving and investment processes to produce an estimate of the amount of capital used at set points in time (e.g., each quarter-end) as well as the overall variability in the prospective financial results. We work closely with the risk management personnel of Third Point LLC, as our investment manager, to measure and report the variability of results from our investment portfolio. We also monitor the contractual exposure to catastrophic losses as aggregated across all bound reinsurance contracts.
Catastrophe Risk Management
Our goal is to build a fund management business that ultimately offers investors a diverse range of products tied to the performance of catastrophe reinsurance risk. Catastrophe reinsurance is an asset class that has historically provided uncorrelated, attractive returns with relatively low volatility. The investor base has grown considerably since 2006, and now includes pension funds, endowments and foundations and family offices.
Our catastrophe fund management business combines a world-class team and platform with deal flow partly sourced through a partnership with global reinsurer Hiscox Ltd. Each potential transaction is underwritten and modeled by a dedicated team with significant experience in a wide range of reinsurance transactions including traditional reinsurance, retrocession, catastrophe bonds and indexed instruments. We use third-party catastrophe models and portfolio management tools to evaluate the suitability of each deal, and all transactions must be reviewed and approved by our Chief Risk Officer and our Chief Underwriting Officer.
The Catastrophe Fund is an open-ended fund providing exposure to a diversified portfolio of peak zone natural catastrophe risk. The Catastrophe Fund seeks return through a unique portfolio construction that limits exposure to any single peril or region. The Catastrophe Fund was launched on January 1, 2013.
Ratings
We currently have an A- (Excellent) financial strength rating with a stable outlook from A.M. Best, which is the fourth highest of 15 ratings. We believe that a strong rating is an important factor in the marketing of reinsurance products to clients and brokers. This rating reflects the rating agency’s opinion of our financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet obligations. It is not an evaluation directed toward the protection of investors or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold our common shares.
Joint Venture and Investment Management Agreement
On December 22, 2011, we entered into the investment management agreement with Third Point LLC, Third Point Re, and Third Point Advisors LLC ("TP GP") (Third Point Re and TP GP, together with any other party admitted in the future as a participant, the “Participants” and each a “Participant”) pursuant to which the parties created a joint venture (the “Account”) whereby Third Point LLC manages the assets of Third Point Re and TP GP as well as our assets and any of our subsidiaries’ assets, if any, in accordance with the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the investment management agreement.

12



Management Fee
Pursuant to the investment management agreement, Third Point LLC is entitled to receive a monthly payment in advance by each Participant (other than TP GP) and is equal to (i) 0.1667% (2.0% annualized) of the capital account of such Participant (before accounting for any accrual of the Performance Allocation (as defined in the investment management agreement)) minus (ii) the aggregate amount of Founders payments paid for such month pursuant to the Founders Agreement, in each case pro-rated for intra-month withdrawals or contributions (see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions-Related Person Transactions-Founders Agreement”). This payment is debited against the capital account of each relevant Participant and paid in cash to Third Point LLC.
Performance Allocation
As further set out in the investment management agreement, the Account has established one or more capital accounts to which capital contributions, withdrawals, net profit and net loss will be allocated in respect of each Participant. At the end of each fiscal year, the Performance Allocation (equal to 20% of the net profit allocable to the capital account of each Participant) will be reallocated to the capital account of TP GP from the capital account of each other Participant, provided, however, that a Performance Allocation will not be made with respect to such capital account until such capital account has recouped the amount of any unrecouped net capital loss in its Loss Recovery Account (as defined in the investment management agreement). If a Participant withdraws all or a portion of its capital account other than at the end of a fiscal year, the Performance Allocation accrued and attributable to the portion withdrawn will be debited against such Participant’s capital account and credited to TP GP’s capital account at the time of withdrawal.
Third Point LLC is required to maintain a Loss Recovery Account in respect of each Participant, the opening balance of which will be zero. Thereafter, for any fiscal year, the Loss Recovery Account balance shall be the sum of all prior year net loss amounts allocated to the Participant and not subsequently offset by prior year net profit amounts allocated to such Participant; provided that the Loss Recovery Account balance shall be reduced proportionately to reflect any withdrawals made by such Participant. TP GP may waive or reduce the Performance Allocation, in its sole discretion. Third Point LLC and TP GP may elect, at the beginning of each fiscal year to restructure the Performance Allocation as a performance fee to Third Point LLC with the same terms as the Performance Allocation.
Investment Guidelines
As detailed in our Investment Management Agreement, Third Point LLC is required to adhere to the following investment guidelines:

Composition of Investments : At least 60% of the investment portfolio will be held in debt or equity securities (including swaps) of publicly traded companies (or their subsidiaries) and governments of OECD (the Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development) high income countries, asset-backed securities, cash, cash equivalents and gold and other precious metals. Except with the prior written consent of the investment committee, none of the assets in the investment portfolio will be held in illiquid investments traditionally considered “venture capital” or private equity investments. In addition, no investments in third party managed funds or other investment vehicles will be made without the consent of the investment committee.

Concentration of Investments : Other than cash, cash equivalents and United States government obligations, no single investment in the investment portfolio will constitute more than 15% of the portfolio.

Liquidity : Assets will be invested in such fashion that Third Point Re has a reasonable expectation that it can meet any of its liabilities as they become due. Third Point Re reviews the liquidity of the Third Point LLC portfolio on a periodic basis.

Net Exposure Limits : The investment portfolio may not employ greater than 1.5 times portfolio assets managed for more than 10 trading days in any 30-trading day period.

13



Term
The investment management agreement has an initial term of five years, subject to automatic renewal for additional successive three-year terms unless a party notifies the other parties at least six months prior to the end of a term that it wishes to terminate the investment management agreement at the end of such term.
We may also terminate the Investment Management Agreement upon the death, long-term disability or retirement of Daniel S. Loeb, or the occurrence of other circumstances in which Mr. Loeb is no longer directing the investment program of Third Point LLC.
We may also withdraw as participants under the investment management agreement prior to the expiration of the investment management agreement’s term at any time only “for cause”, which is defined as:
a material violation of applicable law relating to Third Point LLC’s advisory business;
Third Point LLC’s fraud, gross negligence, willful misconduct or reckless disregard of its obligations under the investment management agreement;
a material breach by Third Point LLC of our investment guidelines that is not cured within a 15-day period;     
a conviction or, a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a felony or a crime affecting the asset management business of Third Point LLC by certain senior officers of Third Point LLC;
any act of fraud, material misappropriation, material dishonesty, embezzlement, or similar conduct against or involving us by senior officers of Third Point LLC; or
a formal administrative or other legal proceeding before the SEC, the CFTC, the FINRA, or any other U.S. or non-U.S. regulatory or self-regulatory organization against Third Point LLC; or certain key personnel which would likely have a material adverse effect on us.
In addition, we may withdraw as a participant under the investment management agreement prior to the expiration of its term if net investment performance of Third Point LLC has (a) incurred a loss in two successive calendar years and (ii) underperformed the S&P 500 Index by at least 10 percentage points for such two successive calendar years, taken as a whole, or (b) (i) incurred a cumulative loss of 10% or more during any 24-month period and (ii) underperformed the S&P 500 Index by at least 15 percentage points for such 24-month period. We may not withdraw or terminate the investment management agreement on the basis of performance other than as provided above. If we become dissatisfied with the results of the investment performance of Third Point LLC, we will be unable to hire new investment managers until the investment management agreement expires by its terms or is terminated for cause.
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we incurred management fees of $ 3.7 million and $ 2.4 million , respectively, payable to Third Point LLC and performance fees of $63.0 million and $ 33.9 million , respectively, payable to TP GP.
Investments
Investment Strategy
As our investment manager, Third Point LLC has the contractual right to manage substantially all of our investable assets until December 22, 2016, and is required to follow our investment guidelines and to act in a manner that is fair and equitable in allocating investment opportunities to us. However, it is not otherwise restricted with respect to the nature or timing of making investments for our account. We have the contractual right to withdraw funds from our managed account to pay claims and expenses as needed. The increase in the value of our investment portfolio assets managed by Third Point LLC for the year ended December 31, 2013 was 23.9% .






14



Investment Portfolio
The following table represents the total long and short exposure and geographic exposure of our investment portfolio as managed by Third Point LLC, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:  
 

2013 Exposure  
 
 
 
2012 Exposure  
 
 

Long  
 
 

Short  
 
 

Net  
 
 

Long  
 
 

Short  
 
 

Net  
 
Long/Short Equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consumer
8
%
 
 %
 
8
 %
 
7
%
 
(3
)%
 
4
 %
Energy & Utility
5
%
 
 %
 
5
 %
 
6
%
 
(2
)%
 
4
 %
Financials
12
%
 
(2
)%
 
10
 %
 
10
%
 
(1
)%
 
9
 %
Healthcare
4
%
 
 %
 
4
 %
 
3
%
 
(3
)%
 
 %
Industries & Commodities
21
%
 
(2
)%
 
19
 %
 
13
%
 
(3
)%
 
10
 %
TMT
25
%
 
(2
)%
 
23
 %
 
20
%
 
(1
)%
 
19
 %
Market Hedges
1
%
 
(2
)%
 
(1
)%
 
4
%
 
(7
)%
 
(3
)%
Total L/S Equity
76
%
 
(8
)%
 
68
 %
 
63
%
 
(20
)%
 
43
 %
Credit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Distressed
5
%
 
 %
 
5
 %
 
5
%
 
 %
 
5
 %
Performing
8
%
 
(5
)%
 
3
 %
 
13
%
 
(5
)%
 
8
 %
Asset Backed Securities (1)
18
%
 
(1
)%
 
17
 %
 
18
%
 
(2
)%
 
16
 %
Total Credit
31
%
 
(6
)%
 
25
 %
 
36
%
 
(7
)%
 
29
 %
Macro
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gold
%
 
 %
 
 %
 
6
%
 
(1
)%
 
5
 %
Government
2
%
 
(9
)%
 
(7
)%
 
4
%
 
(19
)%
 
(15
)%
Tail Risk
3
%
 
(2
)%
 
1
 %
 
%
 
 %
 
 %
Total Macro
5
%
 
(11
)%
 
(6
)%
 
10
%
 
(20
)%
 
(10
)%
Other
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Arbitrage
%
 
 %
 
 %
 
1
%
 
 %
 
1
 %
Private
%
 
 %
 
 %
 
%
 
 %
 
 %
Total Other
%
 
 %
 
 %
 
1
%
 
 %
 
1
 %
 
112
%
 
(25
)%
 
87
 %
 
110
%
 
(47
)%
 
63
 %
 
(1)
Includes residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities, and related indices.

 
2013 Exposure  
 
 
 2012 Exposure  
 
 
Long  
 
 
Short  
 
 
Net  
 
 
Long  
 
 
Short  
 
 
Net  
 
Americas
78
%
 
(13
)%
 
65
%
 
95
%
 
(30
)%
 
65
 %
Europe, Middle East and Africa
15
%
 
(7
)%
 
8
%
 
14
%
 
(11
)%
 
3
 %
Asia
19
%
 
(5
)%
 
14
%
 
1
%
 
(6
)%
 
(5
)%
 
112
%
 
(25
)%
 
87
%
 
110
%
 
(47
)%
 
63
 %
In managing our investment account, Third Point LLC assigns every investment position a sector, strategy and particular geographic category. The dollar exposure of each position under each category is aggregated and the exposure percentages listed in the exposure table represent the aggregate market exposure of a given category against the total net asset value of the account. Long and short exposure percentages represent the aggregate relative value of all long and short positions in a given category, respectively. Net exposure represents the short exposure subtracted from the long exposure in a given category. Third Point LLC reports the composition of our total managed portfolio on a market exposure basis, which it believes is the appropriate manner in which to assess the exposure and profile of investments and is the way in which it manages the portfolio. Under this methodology, the exposure for equity swaps and futures contracts are reported at their full notional amount. The notional amount of any derivative contract is the underlying value upon which payment obligations are computed. For an equity total return swap, for example, the notional amount is the number of shares underlying the swap multiplied by the market price of those shares. Options

15



are reported at their delta adjusted basis. The delta of an equity option is the sensitivity of the option price to the underlying stock price. The delta adjusted basis is the number of shares underlying the option multiplied by the delta and the underlying stock price. Credit derivatives are reported in accordance with their equivalent underlying security exposure. Currency derivatives are reported at fair market value. Cash and cash equivalents are excluded from exposure calculations.
Investment Returns
A summary of our net investment income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
($ in thousands)
Net unrealized gains on investments and investment derivatives
 
$
78,950

 
$
113,422

Net realized gains on investments and investment derivatives
 
236,333

 
55,632

Net gain (loss) on foreign currencies
 
21,106

 
(219
)
Dividend and interest income, net of withholding taxes
 
14,233

 
25,284

Dividends paid on securities sold, not yet purchased
 
(722
)
 
(1,629
)
Management and performance fees
 
(87,333
)
 
(50,211
)
Other expenses
 
(8,863
)
 
(5,411
)
Net investment income on investments managed by Third Point LLC
 
253,704

 
136,868

Deposit liabilities and reinsurance contracts investment expense
 
(4,922
)
 
(446
)
Investment income on cash collateral held by the Catastrophe Reinsurer
 
86

 

Net gain on reinsurance contract derivatives written by the Catastrophe Reinsurer
 
4,335

 

 
 
$
253,203

 
$
136,422

The investment return is based on the total assets in our investment account managed by Third Point LLC, which includes the majority of our equity capital and collected premiums. Investment returns for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, net of all fees and expenses, is as follows: (1)     
 
2013
 
2012
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
23.9
%
 
17.7
%
S&P 500
32.4
%
 
16.0
%

(1)
Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.
Our investment manager, Third Point LLC, manages several funds and may manage other client accounts besides ours, some of which have, or may have, objectives and investment portfolio compositions similar to ours. Because of the similarity or potential similarity of our investment portfolio to these others, and because, as a matter of ordinary course, Third Point LLC provides its clients, including us, and investors in its main hedge funds with results of their respective investment portfolios following the last day of each month, those other clients or investors indirectly may have material nonpublic information regarding our investment portfolio. To address this issue, and to comply with Regulation FD, we will continue to post on our website under the heading Investment Portfolio Returns located in the Investors section of the website, following the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange on the last business day of each month, our preliminary monthly investment results for that month, with additional information regarding our monthly investment results to be posted following the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange on the first business day of the following month.
Investment Regulatory Concerns and Restrictions
Third Point LLC is involved regularly in trading activities which involve a broad number of U.S. and foreign securities law regimes, including laws governing trading on inside information, market manipulation and a broad number of technical trading requirements that involve fundamental market regulation policies. Violation of such laws

16



could result in severe restrictions on Third Point LLC’s activities and, indirectly, damage to our investment portfolio and/or reputation as our Investment Management Agreement has limited termination provisions.
Third Point LLC’s failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations could result in fines, censure, suspensions of personnel or other sanctions. The regulations that Third Point LLC is subject to are designed primarily to ensure the integrity of the financial markets. They are not designed to protect us or, indirectly, you. Even if a sanction imposed against Third Point LLC or one of its personnel by a regulator was for a small monetary amount, the adverse publicity related to such sanction against Third Point LLC by regulators could harm its reputation and, possibly, ours.
In recent years, there has been debate in both the U.S. and foreign governments about new rules or regulations to be applicable to alternative investment advisers, like Third Point LLC.
In August 2007, the SEC adopted a new rule intended to clarify the SEC’s authority to bring enforcement actions against investment advisers for fraud against investors and prospective investors in their funds (as opposed to fraud against the funds themselves). Although we do not believe the SEC’s rule has directly affected us, Third Point LLC and, accordingly, our investment strategy, may be adversely affected if new or revised legislation or regulations are enacted or by changes to existing rules and regulations of U.S. or foreign governmental regulatory authorities or self-regulatory organizations that supervise the financial markets.
It is possible that increased regulation of alternative investment advisers could adversely affect Third Point LLC’s ability to manage our investment portfolio or its ability to manage our portfolio pursuant to our existing investment strategy, which could cause us to alter our existing investment strategy and could significantly and negatively affect our business and results of operations. In addition, adverse publicity regarding alternative investment strategies generally, or Third Point LLC or its affiliates specifically, could negatively affect our business reputation and attractiveness as a counterparty to brokers and clients.
Other Trading Restrictions
Third Point LLC may from time to time place it or its affiliates’ representatives on creditors committees or boards of certain companies in which our portfolio is invested. While such representation may enable Third Point LLC to enhance the value of our investments, it may place trading restrictions on certain securities included in our investment portfolio.
Regulation
Bermuda Insurance Regulation
The Insurance Act of 1978
The Insurance Act of 1978, as amended, and related regulations of Bermuda (the “Insurance Act”), which regulates the insurance business of Third Point Re and the Catastrophe Reinsurer, provides that no person shall carry on any insurance business in or from within Bermuda unless registered as an insurer under the Insurance Act by the BMA. Under the Insurance Act insurance business includes reinsurance business. The BMA, in deciding whether to grant registration, has broad discretion to act as it thinks fit in the public interest. The BMA is required by the Insurance Act to determine whether the applicant is a fit and proper body to be engaged in the insurance business and, in particular, whether it has, or has available to it, adequate knowledge and expertise. The registration of an applicant as an insurer is subject to its complying with the terms of its registration and such other conditions as the BMA may impose from time to time. The Insurance Act also grants to the BMA powers to supervise, investigate and intervene in the affairs of insurance companies.
An insurance advisory committee appointed by the Bermuda Minister of Finance advises the BMA on matters connected with the discharge of the BMA’s functions and sub-committees thereof supervise and review the law and practice of insurance in Bermuda, including reviews of accounting and administrative procedures.

17



The Insurance Act imposes on Bermuda insurance companies solvency and liquidity standards and auditing and reporting requirements and grants to the BMA powers to supervise, investigate and intervene in the affairs of insurance companies. Certain significant aspects of the Bermuda insurance regulatory framework are set forth below.
Classification of Insurers
The Insurance Act distinguishes between insurers carrying on long-term business, insurers carrying on general business and insurers carrying on special purpose business. There are six classifications of insurers carrying on general business, ranging from Class 1 insurers (pure captives) to Class 4 insurers (very large commercial underwriters). There is only one classification of special purpose insurer. Third Point Re is registered as a Class 4 insurer and the Catastrophe Reinsurer is registered as a special purpose insurer.
Classification as a Class 4 Insurer
A body corporate is registrable as a Class 4 insurer where (i) it has at the time of its application for registration, or will have before it carries on insurance business, a total statutory capital and surplus of not less than $100,000,000; and (ii) it intends to carry on general insurance business, including excess liability business or property catastrophe reinsurance business. Class 4 insurers are required to maintain fully paid-up share capital of $1,000,000.
Classification as a Special Purpose Insurer
A special purpose insurer (“SPI”) means an insurer that carries on special purpose business. Special purpose business is defined under the Insurance Act as insurance business under which an insurer fully funds its liabilities to the persons insured through (a) the proceeds of any one or more of (i) a debt issuance where the repayment rights of the providers of such debt are subordinated to the rights of the person insured, or (ii) some other financing mechanism approved by the BMA; (b) cash; and (c) time deposits.
Principal Representative and Principal Office
Third Point Re and the Catastrophe Reinsurer are each required to maintain a principal office and to appoint and maintain a principal representative in Bermuda. For the purpose of the Insurance Act, the principal officer of Third Point Re is at our principal executive offices in Bermuda, and Third Point Re’s principal representative is John Berger. The principal office of the Catastrophe Reinsurer is at The Waterfront, Chesney House, 96 Pitts Bay Road, Pembroke HM 08 Bermuda and the Catastrophe Reinsurer’s principal representative is Prime Management Limited. Without a reason acceptable to the BMA, an insurer may not terminate the appointment of its principal representative, and the principal representative may not cease to act as such, unless 30 days’ notice in writing to the BMA is given of the intention to do so.
It is the duty of the principal representative to forthwith notify the BMA where the principal representative believes there is a likelihood of the insurer (for which the principal representative acts) becoming insolvent or that a reportable “event” has, to the principal representative’s knowledge, occurred or is believed to have occurred. Examples of a reportable “event” include a failure by Third Point Re to comply substantially with a condition imposed upon it by the BMA relating to a solvency margin or a liquidity or other ratio, a significant loss likely to cause the insurer to fail to comply with its enhanced capital requirement (discussed below) and the occurrence of a “material change” (as such term is defined under the Insurance Act) in its business operations.
Within 14 days of such notification to the BMA, the principal representative must furnish the BMA with a written report setting out all the particulars of the case that are available to the principal representative.
Loss Reserve Specialist
As a Class 4 insurer, Third Point Re must appoint an individual approved by the BMA to be its loss reserve specialist. In order to qualify as an approved loss reserve specialist, the applicant must be an individual and possess adequate professional qualifications as a casualty actuary and/or possess adequate experience to assess the sufficiency of insurance reserves of the insurer. The Class 4 insurer is required to submit annually an opinion of its approved loss reserve specialist with its statutory financial return in respect of its loss and loss expense provisions.
As an SPI, the Catastrophe Reinsurer is not required to appoint a loss reserve specialist.

18



Annual Financial Statements
As a Class 4 insurer, Third Point Re must prepare and submit, on an annual basis, both audited U.S. GAAP and statutory financial statements.
The Catastrophe Reinsurer, as an SPI, must prepare and submit annual statutory financial statements, unless an application has been filed under the Insurance Act to have the statutory filing requirement waived. Where such a waiver has been granted, the BMA will accept unaudited management accounts from the SPI prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) or international financial reporting standards that apply in Bermuda, Canada, the United Kingdom or the United States of America. The Catastrophe Reinsurer is also required to provide the BMA with a copy of the unaudited management statement accounts as soon as practicable after the same have been submitted to the participants and, at a minimum, within four months of the end of each financial year.
The Insurance Act prescribes rules for the preparation and substance of statutory financial statements (which include, in statutory form, a balance sheet, income statement, a statement of capital and surplus, and notes thereto). The statutory financial statements include detailed information and analysis regarding premiums, claims, reinsurance and investments of the insurer. In addition, as a Class 4 insurer, Third Point Re is also required to prepare and submit to the BMA financial statements which have been prepared under generally accepted accounting principles or international financial reporting standards (“GAAP financial statements”).
As a Class 4 insurer, Third Point Re’s annual U.S. GAAP and statutory financial statements are required to be filed with the BMA within four months from the end of the relevant financial year (unless specifically extended).
 
The statutory financial statements do not form part of the public records maintained by the BMA but the GAAP financial statements are available for public inspection.
Annual Statutory Financial Return and Annual Capital and Solvency Return
Third Point Re, as a Class 4 insurer, and the Catastrophe Reinsurer, as an SPI, are required to file with the BMA a statutory financial return no later than four months after its financial year end (unless specifically extended) unless the Catastrophe Reinsurer has filed and obtained a waiver, as outlined above. The statutory financial return includes, among other matters, a report of the approved independent auditor on the statutory financial statements of the insurer, a general business, or special purpose business, as applicable, solvency certificate, the statutory financial statements themselves and the opinion of the loss reserve specialist.
The principal representative and at least two directors of the insurer must sign the solvency certificate. The directors are required to certify whether the minimum solvency margin has been met, and the independent approved auditor is required to state whether in its opinion it was reasonable for the directors to make this certification.
Where an insurer’s accounts have been audited for any purpose other than compliance with the Insurance Act, a statement to that effect must be filed with the statutory financial return.
In addition, each year Third Point Re, as a Class 4 insurer, is also required to file with the BMA a capital and solvency return along with its annual financial statutory return. The prescribed form of capital and solvency return comprises the insurer’s Bermuda Solvency Capital Requirement (“BSCR”) model or an approved internal capital model in lieu thereof (more fully described below), a schedule of fixed income investments by rating categories, a schedule of net loss and loss expense provisions by line of business, a schedule of premiums written by line of business, a schedule of risk management, a schedule of fixed income securities, a schedule of commercial insurer’s solvency self assessment (“CISSA”), a schedule of catastrophe risk return, a schedule of loss triangles or reconciliation of net loss reserves and a schedule of eligible capital.
Neither the statutory financial return nor the capital and solvency return is available for public inspection.
Quarterly Financial Statements
Third Point Re, as a Class 4 insurer not being otherwise subject to group supervision (described below), is required to prepare and file quarterly financial returns with the BMA on or before the last day of the months May, August and November of each year. The quarterly financial returns consist of (i) quarterly unaudited financial statements for each financial quarter (which must minimally include a balance sheet and income statement and must also be recent

19



and not reflect a financial position that exceeds two months) and (ii) a list and details of material intra-group transactions and risk concentrations that have materialized since the most recent quarterly or annual financial returns, details surrounding all intra-group reinsurance and retrocession arrangements and other intra-group risk transfer insurance business arrangements that have materialized since the most recent quarterly or annual financial returns and details of the ten largest exposures to unaffiliated counterparties and any other unaffiliated counterparty exposures exceeding 10% of the insurer’s statutory capital and surplus. Quarterly financial statements are not required where the Class 4 insurer is subject to group supervision.
Independent Approved Auditor
Third Point Re, as a Class 4 insurer, must appoint an independent auditor who will annually audit and report on the insurer’s GAAP financial statements, its statutory financial statements and its statutory financial returns, each of which are required to be filed annually with the BMA. The auditor must be approved by the BMA as the independent auditor of the insurer. If the insurer fails to appoint an approved auditor or at any time fails to fill a vacancy for such auditor, the BMA may appoint an approved auditor for the insurer and shall fix the remuneration to be paid to the approved auditor within 14 days, if not agreed sooner by the insurer and the auditor.
 
The Catastrophe Reinsurer, as an SPI, may file an application under the Insurance Act to have this requirement waived, as outlined above.
Non-insurance Business
Third Point Re, as a Class 4 insurer may not engage in non-insurance business unless that non-insurance business is ancillary to its core business. Non-insurance business means any business other than insurance business and includes carrying on investment business, managing an investment fund as operator, carrying on business as a fund administrator, carrying on banking business, underwriting debt or securities or otherwise engaging in investment banking, engaging in commercial or industrial activities and carrying on the business of management, sales or leasing of real property. Third Point Re, as a Class 4 insurer registered before December 31, 2012, will be permitted to continue engaging in non-insurance business but must discontinue doing so not later than year-end 2016.
Minimum Liquidity Ratio
The Insurance Act provides a minimum liquidity ratio for general business. As an insurer engaged in general business, Third Point Re is required to maintain the value of its relevant assets at not less than 75% of the amount of its relevant liabilities. Relevant assets include cash and time deposits, quoted investments, unquoted bonds and debentures, first liens on real estate, investment income due and accrued, accounts and premiums receivable, reinsurance balances receivable and funds held by ceding reinsurers.
There are certain categories of assets which, unless specifically permitted by the BMA, do not automatically qualify as relevant assets, such as unquoted equity securities, investments in and advances to affiliates and real estate and collateral loans.
The relevant liabilities are total general business insurance reserves and total other liabilities less deferred income tax and sundry liabilities (by interpretation, those not specifically defined) and letters of credit and guarantees.
Minimum Solvency Margin and Enhanced Capital Requirements
The Insurance Act provides that the value of the statutory assets of a Class 4 insurer must exceed the value of its statutory liabilities by an amount greater than its prescribed minimum solvency margin (“MSM”).
The MSM that must be maintained by a Class 4 insurer with respect to its general business is the greater of (i) $100 million, or (ii) 50% of net premium written (with a credit for reinsurance ceded not exceeding 25% of gross premiums) or (iii) 15% of net discounted aggregate loss and loss expense provisions and other insurance reserves.
The Insurance Act provides that an SPI is required to maintain a minimum solvency margin by which the value of the special purpose business assets must exceed its special purpose business liabilities by at least $1.

20



Class 4 insurers are also required to maintain available statutory capital and surplus at a level equal to or in excess of its enhanced capital requirement (“ECR”) which is established by reference to either the BSCR model or an approved internal capital model.
The BSCR model is a risk-based capital model which provides a method for determining an insurer’s capital requirements (statutory capital and surplus) by taking into account the risk characteristics of different aspects of the insurer’s business. The BSCR formulae establish capital requirements for eight categories of risk: fixed income investment risk, equity investment risk, interest rate/liquidity risk, premium risk, reserve risk, credit risk, catastrophe risk and operational risk. For each category, the capital requirement is determined by applying factors to asset, premium, reserve, creditor, probable maximum loss and operation items, with higher factors applied to items with greater underlying risk and lower factors for less risky items.
While not specifically referred to in the Insurance Act, the BMA has also established a target capital level (“TCL”) for each Class 4 insurer equal to 120% of its ECR. While a Class 4 insurer is not currently required to maintain its statutory capital and surplus at this level, the TCL serves as an early warning tool for the BMA and failure to maintain statutory capital at least equal to the TCL will likely result in increased regulatory oversight.
Any Class 4 insurer which at any time fails to meet its MSM requirements must, upon becoming aware of such failure, immediately notify the BMA and, within 14 days thereafter, file a written report with the BMA containing particulars of the circumstances that gave rise to the failure and setting out its plan detailing specific actions to be taken and the expected timeframe in which the company intends to rectify the failure.
Any Class 4 insurer which at any time fails to meet its enhanced capital requirement applicable to it shall upon becoming aware of that failure, or of having reason to believe that such a failure has occurred, immediately notify the BMA in writing and within 14 days of such notification file with the BMA a written report containing particulars of the circumstances leading to the failure; and a plan detailing the manner, specific actions to be taken and time within which the insurer intends to rectify the failure and within 45 days of becoming aware of that failure, or of having reason to believe that such a failure has occurred, furnish the BMA with (i) unaudited interim statutory financial statements covering such period as the BMA may require; (ii) the opinion of a loss reserve specialist where applicable; (iii) a general business solvency certificate in respect of the financial statements; and (iv) a capital and solvency return reflecting an enhanced capital requirement prepared using post failure data where applicable.
Eligible Capital
To enable the BMA to better assess the quality of the insurer’s capital resources, a Class 4 insurer is required to disclose the makeup of its capital in accordance with the recently introduced ‘3-tiered capital system’. Under this system, all of the insurer’s capital instruments will be classified as either basic or ancillary capital which in turn will be classified into one of 3 tiers based on their “loss absorbency” characteristics. Highest quality capital will be classified as Tier 1 Capital, lesser quality capital will be classified as either Tier 2 Capital or Tier 3 Capital. Under this regime, up to certain specified percentages of Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 Capital may be used to support the insurer’s MSM, ECR and TCL.
The characteristics of the capital instruments that must be satisfied to qualify as Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 Capital are set out in the Insurance (Eligible Capital) Rules 2012, and any amendments thereto. Under these rules, Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 Capital may, until January 1, 2024, include capital instruments that do not satisfy the requirement that the instrument be non-redeemable or settled only with the issuance of an instrument of equal or higher quality upon a breach, or if it would cause a breach, of the ECR.
Where the BMA has previously approved the use of certain instruments for capital purposes, the BMA’s consent will need to be obtained if such instruments are to remain eligible for use in satisfying the MSM and the ECR.
Code of Conduct
Every Bermuda registered insurer must comply with the Insurance Code of Conduct (the “Code”) which prescribes the duties and standards that must be complied with to ensure sound corporate governance, risk management and internal controls are implemented. The BMA will assess an insurer’s compliance with the Code in a proportionate

21



manner relative to the nature, scale and complexity of its business. Failure to comply with the requirements of the Code will be taken into account by the BMA in determining whether an insurer is conducting its business in a sound and prudent manner as prescribed by the Insurance Act and may result in the BMA exercising its powers of intervention and investigation (see below) and, in the case of Third Point Re, as a Class 4 insurer, will be a factor in calculating the operational risk charge under the insurer’s BSCR or approved internal model.
Restrictions on Dividends and Distributions
A Class 4 insurer is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if it is in breach of its MSM, ECR or minimum liquidity ratio or if the declaration or payment of such dividend would cause such a breach. An SPI is prohibited from declaring or paying any dividend during any financial year if it is in breach of its minimum solvency margin or if the declaration or payment of such dividends would cause it to fail to meet such minimum margin. Where a Class 4 insurer fails to meet its MSM or minimum liquidity ratio or an SPI fails to meet its minimum solvency margin on the last day of any financial year, it is prohibited from declaring or paying any dividends during the next financial year without the approval of the BMA.
In addition, a Class 4 insurer is prohibited from declaring or paying in any financial year dividends of more than 25% of its total statutory capital and surplus (as shown on its previous financial year’s statutory balance sheet) unless it files (at least seven days before payment of such dividends) with the BMA an affidavit signed by at least 2 directors (one of whom must be a Bermuda resident director if any of the insurer’s directors are resident in Bermuda) and the principal representative stating that it will continue to meet its solvency margin and minimum liquidity ratio. Where such an affidavit is filed, it shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the BMA.
Reduction of Capital
Third Point Re, as a general business insurer, may not reduce its total statutory capital by 15% or more, as set out in its previous year’s financial statements, unless it has received the prior approval of the BMA. Total statutory capital consists of the insurer’s paid in share capital, its contributed surplus (sometimes called additional paid in capital) and any other fixed capital designated by the BMA as statutory capital (such as letters of credit).
As a Class 4 insurer, where Third Point Re seeks to reduce its statutory capital by 15% or more, as set out in its previous year’s financial statements, it must also submit an affidavit signed by at least 2 directors (one of whom must be a Bermuda resident director if any of the company’s directors are resident in Bermuda) and the principal representative stating that the proposed reduction will not cause the company to fail its relevant margins. Where such an affidavit is filed, it shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the BMA.
Fit and Proper Controllers
The BMA maintains supervision over the controllers of all registered insurers in Bermuda. A controller includes (i) the managing director of the registered insurer or its parent company; (ii) the chief executive of the registered insurer or of its parent company; (iii) a shareholder controller; and, (iv) any person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors of the registered insurer or of its parent company are accustomed to act.
The definition of shareholder controller is set out in the Insurance Act but generally refers to (i) a person who holds 10% or more of the shares carrying rights to vote at a shareholders’ meeting of the registered insurer or its parent company, or (ii) a person who is entitled to exercise 10% or more of the voting power at any shareholders’ meeting of such registered insurer or its parent company, or (iii) a person who is able to exercise significant influence over the management of the registered insurer or its parent company by virtue of its shareholding or its entitlement to exercise, or control the exercise of, the voting power at any shareholders’ meeting.
A shareholder controller that owns 10% or more but less than 20% of the shares as described above is defined as a 10% shareholder controller; a shareholder controller that owns 20% or more but less than 33% of the shares as described above is defined as a 20% shareholder controller; a shareholder controller that owns 33% or more but less than 50% of the shares as described above is defined as a 33% shareholder controller; and a shareholder controller that owns 50% or more of the shares as described above is defined as a 50% shareholder controller.

22



Where the shares of the shareholder of a registered insurer, or the shares of its parent company, are traded on a recognised stock exchange, and such person becomes a 10%, 20%, 33% or 50% shareholder controller of the insurer, that person shall, within 45 days, notify the BMA in writing that he has become such a controller.
Where the shares of a shareholder or prospective shareholder of an insurer, or the shares of its parent company, are not traded on a recognised stock exchange (i.e. private companies), the Insurance Act prohibits such person from becoming a shareholder controller unless he has first served on the BMA notice in writing stating that he intends to become such a controller and the BMA has either, before the end of 45 days following the date of notification, provided notice to the proposed controller that it does not object to his becoming such a controller or the full 45 days has elapsed without the BMA filing an objection.
Any person who contravenes the Insurance Act by failing to give notice or knowingly becoming a controller of any description before the required 45 days has elapsed is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $25,000 on summary conviction.
The BMA may file a notice of objection to any person who has become a controller of any description where it appears that such person is not, or is no longer, a fit and proper person to be a controller of the registered insurer. Before issuing a notice of objection, the BMA is required to serve upon the person concerned a preliminary written notice stating the BMA’s intention to issue formal notice of objection. Upon receipt of the preliminary written notice, the person served may, within 28 days, file written representations with the BMA which shall be taken into account by the BMA in making its final determination. Any person who continues to be a controller of any description after having received a notice of objection shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine of $25,000 (and a continuing fine of $500 per day for each day that the offence is continuing) or, if convicted on indictment, to a fine of $100,000 and/or 2 years in prison.
Notification by Registered Person of Change of Controllers and Officers
All registered insurers are required to give written notice to the BMA of the fact that a person has become, or ceased to be, a controller or officer of the registered insurer within 45 days of becoming aware of such fact. An officer in relation to a registered insurer means a director, chief executive or senior executive performing duties of underwriting, actuarial, risk management, compliance, internal audit, finance or investment matters.
Notification of Material Changes
All registered insurers are required to give notice to the BMA of their intention to effect a material change within the meaning of the Insurance Act. For the purposes of the Insurance Act, the following changes are material: (i) the transfer or acquisition of insurance business being part of a scheme falling under section 25 of the Insurance Act or section 99 of the Companies Act, (ii) the amalgamation with or acquisition of another firm, (iii) engaging in unrelated business that is retail business, (iv) the acquisition of a controlling interest in an undertaking that is engaged in non-insurance business which offers services and products to persons who are not affiliates of the insurer, (v) outsourcing all or substantially all of the company’s actuarial, risk management and internal audit functions, (vi) outsourcing all or a material part of an insurer’s underwriting activity, (vii) the transfer other than by way of reinsurance of all or substantially all of a line of business, and (viii) the expansion into a material new line of business.
No registered insurer shall take any steps to give effect to a material change unless it has first served notice on the BMA that it intends to effect such material change and before the end of 14 days, either the BMA has notified such company in writing that it has no objection to such change or that period has lapsed without the BMA having issued a notice of objection.
Before issuing a notice of objection, the BMA is required to serve upon the person concerned a preliminary written notice stating the BMA’s intention to issue formal notice of objection. Upon receipt of the preliminary written notice, the person served may, within 28 days, file written representations with the BMA which shall be taken into account by the BMA in making its final determination.

23



Group Supervision
The BMA may, in respect of an insurance group, determine whether it is appropriate for it to act as its group supervisor. An insurance group is defined as a group of companies that conducts exclusively, or mainly, insurance business. The BMA may make such determination where it ascertains that (i) the group is headed by a “specified insurer” (that is to say, it is headed by either a Class 3A, Class 3B or Class 4 general business insurer or a Class C, Class D or Class E long term insurer or another class of insurer designated by order of the BMA); or (ii) where the insurance group is not headed by a “specified insurer”, where it is headed by a parent company which is incorporated in Bermuda or (iii) where the parent company of the group is not a Bermuda company, in circumstances where the BMA is satisfied that the insurance group is directed and managed from Bermuda or the insurer with the largest balance sheet total is a specified insurer.
Where the BMA determines that it should act as the group supervisor, it shall designate a specified insurer that is a member of the insurance group to be the designated insurer (the “Designated Insurer”) and it shall give to the Designated Insurer and other competent authorities written notice of its intention to act as group supervisor. Once the BMA has been designated as group supervisor, the Designated Insurer must ensure that an approved group actuary is appointed to provide an opinion as to the adequacy of the insurance group’s insurance reserves as reported in its group statutory financial statements.
Pursuant to its powers under the Insurance Act, the BMA will maintain a register of particulars for every insurance group for which it acts as the group supervisor detailing, among other things, the names and addresses of the Designated Insurer; each member company of the insurance group falling within the scope of group supervision; the principal representative of the insurance group in Bermuda; other competent authorities supervising other member companies of the insurance group; and the insurance group auditors. The Designated Insurer must notify the BMA of any changes to the above details entered on the register of an insurance group.
As group supervisor, the BMA will perform a number of supervisory functions including (i) coordinating the gathering and dissemination of information which is of importance for the supervisory task of other competent authorities; (ii) carrying out a supervisory review and assessment of the insurance group; (iii) carrying out an assessment of the insurance group’s compliance with the rules on solvency, risk concentration, intra-group transactions and good governance procedures; (iv) planning and coordinating, with other competent authorities, supervisory activities in respect of the insurance group, both as a going concern and in emergency situations; (v) coordinating any enforcement action that may need to be taken against the insurance group or any of its members; and (vi) planning and coordinating meetings of colleges of supervisors (consisting of insurance regulators) in order to facilitate the carrying out of the functions described above.
In carrying out its functions, the BMA may make rules for (i) assessing the financial situation and the solvency position of the insurance group and/or its members and (ii) regulating intra-group transactions, risk concentration, governance procedures, risk management and regulatory reporting and disclosure.
We are not currently subject to group supervision, but the BMA may exercise its authority to act as our group supervisor in the future.
Supervision, Investigation, Intervention and Disclosure
The BMA may, by notice in writing served on an insurer or a designated insurer (as described in “Group Supervision” above), require the insurer or designated insurer to provide such information and/or documentation as the BMA may reasonably require with respect to matters that are likely to be material to the performance of its supervisory functions under the Insurance Act. In addition, it may require such person’s auditor, underwriter, accountant or any other person with relevant professional skill to prepare a report on any aspect pertaining thereto. In the case of a report, the person so appointed shall immediately give the BMA written notice of any fact or matter of which he becomes aware or which indicates to him that any condition attaching to his registration under the Insurance Act is not or has not or may not be or may not have been fulfilled and that such matters are likely to be material to the performance of its functions under the Insurance Act. If it appears to the BMA to be desirable in the interests of the clients of an insurer

24



or relevant insurance group, the BMA may also exercise these powers in relation to subsidiaries, parent companies and other affiliates of the insurer or designated insurer.
If the BMA deems it necessary to protect the interests of the policyholders or potential policyholders of an insurer or insurance group, it may appoint one or more competent persons to investigate and report on the nature, conduct or state of the insurer’s or the insurance group’s business, or any aspect thereof, or the ownership or control of the insurer or insurance group. If the person so appointed thinks it necessary for the purposes of his investigation, he may also investigate the business of any person who is or has been at any relevant time, a member of the insurance group or of a partnership of which the person being investigated is a member. In this regard, it shall be the duty of every person who is or was a controller, officer, employee, agent, banker, auditor, accountant, barrister and attorney or insurance manager to produce to the person appointed such documentation as he may reasonably require for purposes of his investigation, and to attend and answer questions relevant to the investigation and to otherwise provide such assistance as may be necessary in connection therewith.
Where the BMA suspects that a person has failed to properly register under the Insurance Act or that an insurer or designated insurer has failed to comply with a requirement of the Insurance Act or that a person is not, or is no longer, a fit and proper person to perform functions in relation to a regulated activity, it may, by notice in writing, carry out an investigation into such person (or any other person connected thereto). In connection therewith, the BMA may require every person who is or was a controller, officer, employee, agent, banker, auditor, accountant, barrister and attorney or insurance manager to make a report and produce such documents in his care, custody and control and to attend before the BMA to answer questions relevant to the BMA’s investigation and to take such actions as the BMA may direct. The BMA may also enter any premises for the purposes of carrying out its investigation and may petition the court for a warrant if it believes a person has failed to comply with a notice served on him or there are reasonable grounds for suspecting the completeness of any information or documentation produced in response to such notice or that its directions will not be complied with or that any relevant documents would be removed, tampered with or destroyed.
If it appears to the BMA that the business of the insurer is being so conducted that there is a significant risk of the insurer becoming insolvent, or that the insurer is in breach of the Insurance Act or any conditions imposed upon its registration, or the minimum criteria stipulated in the Insurance Act is not or has not been fulfilled in respect of a registered insurer, or that a person has become a controller without providing the BMA with the appropriate notice or in contravention of a notice of objection, or the registered insurer is in breach of its ECR, or that a designated insurer is in breach of any provision of the Insurance Act or the regulations or rules applicable to it, the BMA may issue such directions as appear desirable for safeguarding the interests of policyholders or potential policyholders of the insurer or the insurance group. The BMA may direct an insurer, for itself and in its capacity as designated insurer of the insurance group of which it is a member, (1) not to take on any new insurance business, (2) not to vary any insurance contract if the effect would be to increase the insurer’s liabilities, (3) not to make certain investments, (4) to realize certain investments, (5) to maintain in, or transfer to the custody of, a specified bank, certain assets, (6) not to declare or pay any dividends or other distributions or to restrict the making of such payments, (7) to limit its premium income, (8) not to enter into specified transactions with any specified person or persons of a specified class, (9) to provide such written particulars relating to the financial circumstances of the insurer as the BMA thinks fit, (10) (as an individual insurer only and not in its capacity as designated insurer) to obtain the opinion of a loss reserve specialist and submit it to the BMA and/or (11) to remove a controller or officer.
The BMA has the power to assist other regulatory authorities, including foreign insurance regulatory authorities, with their investigations involving insurance and reinsurance companies in Bermuda if it is satisfied that the assistance being requested is in connection with the discharge of regulatory responsibilities and that such cooperation is in the public interest. The grounds for disclosure by the BMA to a foreign regulatory authority without consent of the insurer are limited and the Insurance Act provides for sanctions for breach of the statutory duty of confidentiality.
 
Cancellation of Insurer’s Registration
An insurer’s registration may be canceled by the BMA on certain grounds specified in the Insurance Act. Failure by the insurer to comply with its obligations under the Insurance Act or if, the BMA believes that the insurer has not been carrying on business in accordance with sound.

25



In addition to powers under the Insurance Act to investigate the affairs of an insurer, the BMA may require certain information from an insurer (or certain other persons) to be produced to the BMA. Further, the BMA has been given powers to assist other regulatory authorities, including foreign insurance regulatory authorities, with their investigations involving insurance and reinsurance companies in Bermuda but subject to restrictions. For example, the BMA must be satisfied that the assistance being requested is in connection with the discharge of regulatory responsibilities of the foreign regulatory authority. Further, the BMA must consider whether cooperation is in the public interest. The grounds for disclosure are limited and the Insurance Act provides for sanctions for breach of the statutory duty of confidentiality.

Certain Other Bermuda Law Considerations
All Bermuda “exempted companies” are exempt from certain Bermuda laws restricting the percentage of share capital that may be held by non-Bermudians. However, exempted companies may not participate in certain business transactions, including (i) the acquisition or holding of land in Bermuda except that required for their business and held by way of lease or tenancy for terms of not more than 50 years or, with the consent of the Minister of Finance, land which is used to provide accommodation or recreational facilities for officers and our employees for a term not exceeding 21 years, (ii) the taking of mortgages on land in Bermuda to secure an amount in excess of $50,000 without the consent of the Minister, (iii) the acquisition of any bonds or debentures secured by any land in Bermuda, other than certain types of Bermuda government securities or securities issued by Bermuda public authorities or, (iv) the carrying on of business of any kind in Bermuda, except in furtherance of the business carried on outside Bermuda or under license granted by the Minister. Generally it is not permitted without a special license granted by the Minister to insure Bermuda domestic risks or risks of persons of, in or based in Bermuda.
All Bermuda companies must comply with the provisions of the Companies Act regulating the payment of dividends and making distributions from contributed surplus. A company may not declare or pay a dividend, or make a distribution out of contributed surplus, if there are reasonable grounds for believing that: (i) the company is, or would after the payment be, unable to pay its liabilities as they become due; or (ii) the realizable value of the company’s assets would thereby be less than its liabilities.
United States Insurance Regulation
Third Point Re is licensed in Bermuda to write reinsurance and is not admitted to do business in any jurisdiction in the United States or in any country other than Bermuda. The insurance laws of each state of the United States and of many foreign countries regulate the sale of insurance and reinsurance within their jurisdictions by alien insurers and reinsurers, such as Third Point Re.
Third Point Re currently intends to conduct its business so as not to be subject to the licensing requirements of insurance regulators in the United States or elsewhere (other than Bermuda). Many aspects of the activities of Third Point Re are similar to those employed by other non-admitted reinsurers that provide reinsurance to U.S. and other ceding companies. There can be no assurance, however, that insurance regulators in the United States or elsewhere will not review the activities of Third Point Re and claim that Third Point Re is subject to such jurisdiction’s licensing requirements.
In addition to the regulatory requirements imposed by the jurisdictions in which they are licensed, reinsurers are subject to indirect regulatory requirements imposed by jurisdictions in which their ceding companies are licensed through the “credit for reinsurance” mechanism. In general, a ceding company which obtains reinsurance from a reinsurer that is licensed, accredited or approved by the jurisdiction or state in which the insurer files statutory financial statements is permitted to reflect in its statutory financial statements a credit in an aggregate amount equal to the liability for unearned premiums and loss reserves and loss adjustment expense reserves ceded to the reinsurer.
In the United States, many states allow credit for reinsurance ceded to a reinsurer that is domiciled and licensed in another state of the United States and meets certain financial requirements. A few states do not allow credit for reinsurance ceded to non-licensed reinsurers except in certain limited circumstances and others impose additional requirements that make it difficult to become accredited. The great majority of states, however, permit the reduction in statutory surplus resulting from reinsurance obtained from a non-licensed or non-accredited reinsurer to be offset to

26



the extent that the reinsurer provides a letter of credit or other acceptable security arrangement, and a few states reduce the amount of security to be posted based on a number of factors, including the credit rating given to a reinsurer from a U.S.-nationally recognised statistical rating organization.
Information Technology
We have a disaster recovery plan with respect to our information technology infrastructure that includes arrangements with an offshore data center. Our secondary off-island location for data systems back-up and recovery is located in Toronto, Canada, due to its non-correlated nature with Bermuda. The environment is configured to be live within one hour of a disaster scenario and supports all of the business capabilities of our primary Bermuda site.
Employees
As of December 31, 2013 we had 20 employees, 18 of whom were based in Bermuda, one of whom was based in the United States and one of whom was based in the United Kingdom. We believe that our employee relations are good. None of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements, and we are not aware of any current efforts to implement such agreements.
Available Information
We are incorporated in Bermuda and our corporate offices are located at The Waterfront, Chesney House, 96 Pitts Bay Road, Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda. Our telephone number is +1 (441) 542-3300. We file annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any documents that we file at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 to obtain further information about the public reference room. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC, including us. You may also access, free of charge, our reports filed with the SEC (for example, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those forms) through the “Investors” portion of our Internet website (www.thirdpointre.bm). Reports filed with or furnished to the SEC will be available as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or furnished to the SEC. Our website is included in this Annual Report as an inactive textual reference only. The information found on our website is not part of this or any other report filed with or furnished to the SEC.
Item 1A. Risk Factors     
You should consider and read carefully all of the risks and uncertainties described below, as well as other information included in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. The risks described below are not the only ones facing us. The occurrence of any of the following risks or additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. This Annual Report also contains forward-looking statements and estimates that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of specific factors, including the risks and uncertainties described below.
Risks Related to Our Business
We are a two year old company with limited historical information available for investors to evaluate our performance or a potential investment in our shares.
We have a limited history of operations. We were incorporated on October 6, 2011 and began underwriting reinsurance transactions on January 1, 2012. As a result, there is limited historical information available to help prospective investors evaluate our performance or an investment in our shares.

27



In general, reinsurance and insurance companies in their initial stages of development present substantial business and financial risks and may suffer significant losses. They must develop business relationships, establish operating procedures, hire staff, install information technology systems, implement management processes and complete other tasks appropriate for the conduct of their intended business activities. In particular, our ability to implement our reinsurance underwriting strategy will depend on, among other things:
our ability to attract clients;

our ability to attract and retain personnel with sufficient underwriting, actuarial and accounting and finance expertise;

our ability to maintain at least an A- (Excellent) rating from A.M. Best or a similar financial strength rating from one or more other ratings agencies;

our ability to evaluate the risks we assume under reinsurance contracts that we write;
our reliance on third parties to provide certain services; and

the risk of being deemed a passive foreign investment company or an investment company if we are deemed to not be in the active conduct of an insurance business or to not be predominantly engaged in an insurance business. See “Risks Relating to Insurance and Other Regulations-We are subject to the risk of becoming an investment company under U.S. federal securities law” and “Risks Relating to Taxation-United States persons who own our shares may be subject to United States federal income taxation on our undistributed earnings and may recognize ordinary income upon disposition of shares.”
We cannot assure you that there will be sufficient demand for the reinsurance products we plan to write to support our planned level of operations, or that we will accomplish the tasks necessary to implement our business strategy.
Our operational structure is not fully developed.
We are continuing to develop and implement our operational structure and enterprise framework, including exposure management, financial reporting, information technology and internal controls, with which we will conduct our business activities. Our operations are currently supplemented by manual processes, and we expect to migrate over time to a more automated control system. While we utilize manual processes, our controls may not be adequate to identify or eliminate risks. There can be no assurance that the development of our operational structure or the implementation of our enterprise risk management framework will proceed smoothly or on our projected timetable or achieve the aforementioned goals.
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make many estimates and judgments, which are even more difficult than those made in a mature company, and which, if inaccurate, could cause volatility in our results.
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Management believes the item that requires the most subjective and complex estimates is the reserve for losses and loss expenses. Due to our relatively short operating history, loss experience is limited and reliable evidence of changes in trends of numbers of claims incurred, average settlement amounts, numbers of claims outstanding and average losses per claim may take years to develop. In addition, the possibility of future litigation or legislative change that may affect interpretation of policy terms further increases the degree of uncertainty in the reserving process. The uncertainties inherent in the reserving process, together with the potential for unforeseen developments, including changes in laws and the prevailing interpretation of policy terms, may result in losses and loss expenses materially different from the reserves initially established. Changes to prior year reserves will affect current underwriting results by increasing net income if the prior year reserves prove to be redundant or by decreasing net income if the prior year reserves prove to

28



be insufficient. We expect volatility in results in periods in which significant loss events occur because U.S. GAAP does not permit insurers or reinsurers to reserve for loss events until they have occurred and are expected to give rise to a claim. As a result, we are not allowed to record contingency reserves to account for expected future losses. We anticipate that claims arising from future events may require the establishment of substantial reserves from time to time.
Our results of operations fluctuate from period to period and may not be indicative of our long-term prospects.
The performance of our reinsurance operations and our investment portfolio fluctuate from period to period. Fluctuations result from a variety of factors, including:
reinsurance contract pricing;
our assessment of the quality of available reinsurance opportunities;
the volume and mix of reinsurance products we underwrite;
loss experience on our reinsurance liabilities;
our ability to assess and integrate our risk management strategy properly; and
the performance of our investment portfolio.
In particular, we seek to underwrite products and make investments to achieve favorable return on equity over the long term. In addition, our opportunistic nature and focus on long-term growth in book value result in fluctuations in total premiums written from period to period as we concentrate on underwriting contracts that we believe will generate better long-term, rather than short-term, results. Accordingly, our short-term results of operations may not be indicative of our long-term prospects.
Established competitors with greater resources may make it difficult for us to effectively market our products or offer our products at a profit.
The reinsurance industry is highly competitive. We compete with major reinsurers, many of which have substantially greater financial, marketing and management resources than we do, as well as other potential providers of capital willing to assume insurance or reinsurance risk. Competition in the types of business that we underwrite is based on many factors, including:
price of reinsurance coverage;
the general reputation and perceived financial strength of the reinsurer;
relationships with reinsurance brokers;
terms and conditions of products offered;
ratings assigned by independent rating agencies;
speed of claims payment and reputation; and

the experience and reputation of the members of our underwriting team in the particular lines of reinsurance we seek to underwrite.
Our competitors include, among others, Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc., Endurance Specialty Holdings Ltd., AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd., Arch Capital Group Ltd., ACE Limited, Alleghany Corporation, Hannover Rückversicherung AG, Everest Re Group, Ltd., Swiss Re Limited, Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG., Maiden Holdings Ltd., PartnerRe Ltd. and Catlin Group Ltd. In addition, Greenlight Reinsurance, Ltd. has a business model similar to ours, and we expect to compete with them in many lines of business and geographies. In the future,

29



we may also have to compete for the type of reinsurance we intend to underwrite with new start-up companies that have a business model similar to ours.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully in the reinsurance market. Our failure to compete effectively would significantly and negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations and may increase the likelihood that we are deemed to be a passive foreign investment company or an investment company. See “Risks Relating to Insurance and Other Regulations-We are subject to the risk of becoming an investment company under U.S. federal securities law” and “Risks Relating to Taxation-United States persons who own our shares may be subject to United States federal income taxation on our undistributed earnings and may recognize ordinary income upon disposition of shares.”
If actual renewals of our existing contracts do not meet expectations, our premiums written in future years and our future results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Many of our contracts are generally written for a one-year term. In our financial forecasting process, we make assumptions about the renewal of our prior year’s contracts. The insurance and reinsurance industries have historically been cyclical businesses with periods of intense competition, often based on price. If actual renewals do not meet expectations or if we choose not to write on a renewal basis because of pricing conditions, our premiums written in future years and our future operations would be materially adversely affected.
The inherent uncertainty of models and the use of such models as a tool to evaluate risk may have an adverse effect on our financial results.
We license analytic and modeling capabilities software from third parties to facilitate our pricing, capital modeling software and objective risk assessment relating to risks in our reinsurance portfolio. These models help us to control risk accumulation, inform management and other stakeholders of capital requirements and to improve the risk/return profile or minimize the amount of capital required to cover the risks in each reinsurance contract in our overall portfolio of reinsurance contracts. However, given the inherent uncertainty of modeling techniques and the application of such techniques, these models and databases may not accurately address the emergence of a variety of matters which might be deemed to impact certain of our coverages. Accordingly, these models may understate the exposures we are assuming and our financial results may be adversely impacted, perhaps significantly.
Operational risks, including human or systems failures, are inherent in our business.
Operational risks and losses can result from many sources including fraud, errors by employees, failure to document transactions properly or to obtain proper internal authorization, failure to comply with regulatory requirements or information technology failures.
We believe our modeling, underwriting and information technology and application systems are critical to our business and reputation. Moreover, our technology and applications are an important part of our underwriting process and our ability to compete successfully. We have licensed certain systems and data from third parties. We cannot be certain that we will have access to these, or comparable systems, or that our technology or applications will continue to operate as intended. In addition, we cannot be certain that we would be able to replace these systems without slowing our underwriting response time. A major defect or failure in our internal controls or information technology and application systems could result in management distraction, harm to our reputation, a loss or delay of revenues or increased expense.
Technology breaches or failures, including those resulting from a malicious cyber-attack on us or our business partners and service providers, could disrupt or otherwise negatively impact our business.
We rely on information technology systems to process, transmit, store and protect the electronic information, financial data and proprietary models that are critical to our business. Furthermore, a significant portion of the

30



communications between our employees and our business, banking and investment partners depends on information technology and electronic information exchange. Like all companies, our information technology systems are vulnerable to data breaches, interruptions or failures due to events that may be beyond our control, including, but not limited to, natural disasters, theft, terrorist attacks, computer viruses, hackers and general technology failures.
We believe that we have established and implemented appropriate security measures, controls and procedures to safeguard our information technology systems and to prevent unauthorized access to such systems and any data processed or stored in such systems, and we periodically evaluate and test the adequacy of such systems, controls and procedures. In addition, we have established a business continuity plan which is designed to ensure that we are able to maintain all aspects of our key business processes functioning in the midst of certain disruptive events, including any disruptions to or breaches of our information technology systems. Our business continuity plan is routinely tested and evaluated for adequacy. Despite these safeguards, disruptions to and breaches of our information technology systems are possible and may negatively impact our business.
It is possible that insurance policies we have in place with third parties would not entirely protect us in the event that we experienced a breach, interruption or widespread failure of our information technology systems. Furthermore, we have not secured insurance coverage designed to specifically protect us from an economic loss resulting from such events.
Although we have never experienced any known or threatened cases involving unauthorized access to our information technology systems or unauthorized appropriation of the data contained within such systems, we have no assurance that such technology breaches will not occur in the future.
We may not be able to manage our growth effectively.
We intend to grow our business in the future, which could require additional capital, systems development and skilled personnel. We cannot assure you that we will be able to meet our capital needs, expand our systems effectively, allocate our human resources optimally, identify and hire qualified employees or incorporate effectively the components of any businesses we may acquire in our effort to achieve growth. Additionally, as we grow, the ability of our management to source sufficient reasonably priced reinsurance business in the segments we target may be limited. The failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our losses may exceed our loss reserves, which could significantly and negatively affect our business.
Our results of operations and financial condition depends upon our ability to assess accurately the potential losses associated with the risks we reinsure. Reserves are estimates of claims an insurer ultimately expects to pay, based upon facts and circumstances known at the time, predictions of future events, estimates of future trends in claim severity and other variable factors. The inherent uncertainties of estimating loss reserves generally are greater for reinsurance companies as compared to primary insurers, primarily due to:
the lapse of time from the occurrence of an event to the reporting of the claim and the ultimate resolution or settlement of the claim;
the diversity of development patterns among different types of reinsurance treaties; and
heavier reliance on the client for information regarding claims.
Actual losses and loss adjustment expenses paid may deviate substantially from the estimates of our loss reserves, to our detriment. If we determine our loss reserves to be inadequate, we will increase our loss reserves with a corresponding reduction in our net income in the period in which we identify the deficiency. Such a reduction would negatively affect our results of operations. If our losses exceed our loss reserves, our financial condition may be significantly and negatively affected.

31



As a recently formed reinsurance company, we do not have the benefit of extended loss experience with our cedents. With additional time, we may determine that our cedents’ loss emergence, incurred and payment patterns are different from those implied in the original submission data. Consequently, we may experience greater than average deviation in our loss reserve estimates when compared to our more established competitors.
The failure of any of the loss limitation methods we employ could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Although we seek to mitigate our loss exposure through a variety of methods, property and casualty reinsurance risk is inherently unpredictable. It is difficult to predict the timing, frequency and severity of loss events with statistical certainty or estimate the amount of loss any given occurrence will generate. It is not possible to completely eliminate our exposure to unforecasted or unpredictable events and, to the extent that losses from such risks occur, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
We seek to manage reinsurance volatility by focusing on lines of business that have historically demonstrated more stable return characteristics, such as property quota share, auto, workers’ compensation and certain segments of crop. These lines of business are often characterized as having exposure to higher frequency and lower severity claims activity, although this has not always been the case. We seek to further manage the volatility of our reinsurance results by writing policies on a quota share basis and through the use of contractual terms and conditions, such as loss ratio caps, within our reinsurance contracts.
In addition, in contrast to many reinsurers with whom we compete, we write property catastrophe reinsurance on an excess of loss basis exclusively through the Catastrophe Reinsurer, which is a separately capitalized reinsurance vehicle. We also write reinsurance contracts that seek to provide protection against adverse development on loss reserves. We seek to provide this type of coverage only on relatively stable reserves where we agree with the client's reserving practices and actuarially determined reserve levels. However, there can be no assurance that these loss limitation methods will be effective in mitigating our exposure, or that market or other conditions would necessitate a different loss mitigation strategy. The failure or ineffectiveness of any of our loss limitation methods could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The property and casualty reinsurance industry is highly cyclical, and we expect to continue to experience periods characterized by excess underwriting capacity and unfavorable premium rates.
Historically, reinsurers have experienced significant fluctuations in operating results due to competition, frequency of occurrence or severity of catastrophic events, levels of capacity, general economic conditions, changes in equity, debt and other investment markets, changes in legislation, case law and prevailing concepts of liability and other factors. In particular, demand for reinsurance is influenced significantly by the underwriting results of primary insurers and prevailing general economic conditions. The supply of reinsurance is related to prevailing prices and levels of surplus capacity that, in turn, may fluctuate in response to changes in rates of return being realized in the reinsurance industry on both underwriting and investment sides.
As a result, the reinsurance business historically has been a cyclical industry characterized by periods of intense price competition due to high levels of available underwriting capacity as well as periods when shortages of capacity have permitted favorable premium levels and changes in terms and conditions. The supply of available reinsurance capital has increased over the past several years and may increase further, either as a result of capital provided by new entrants or by the commitment of additional capital by existing insurers or reinsurers.
Continued increases in the supply of reinsurance may have consequences for us and for the reinsurance insurance generally, including fewer contracts written, lower premium rates, increased expenses for customer acquisition and retention, and less favorable policy terms and conditions. As a result, we may be unable to fully execute our reinsurance strategy of selling lower-volatility business. The effects of cyclicality could significantly and negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations.

32



The effect of emerging claim and coverage issues on our business is uncertain.
As industry practices and legal, judicial and regulatory conditions change, unexpected issues related to claims and coverage may emerge. Various provisions of our contracts, such as limitations or exclusions from coverage or choice of forum, may be difficult to enforce in the manner we intend, due to, among other things, disputes relating to coverage and choice of legal forum. These issues may adversely affect our business by either extending coverage beyond the period that we intended or by increasing the number or size of claims. In some instances, these changes may not manifest themselves until many years after we have issued insurance or reinsurance contracts that are affected by these changes. As a result, we may not be able to ascertain the full extent of our liabilities under our insurance or reinsurance contracts for many years following the issuance of our contracts. The effects of unforeseen development or substantial government intervention could adversely impact our ability to adhere to our goals.
A downgrade or withdrawal of our A.M. Best rating would significantly and negatively affect our ability to implement our business strategy successfully.
Companies, insurers and reinsurance brokers use ratings from independent ratings agencies as an important means of assessing the financial strength and quality of reinsurers. A.M. Best has assigned us a financial strength rating of A- (Excellent), which is the fourth highest of 15 ratings that A.M. Best issues. This rating reflects the rating agency’s opinion of our financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet obligations. It is not an evaluation directed toward the protection of investors or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold our shares. A.M. Best periodically reviews our rating, and may revise it downward or revoke it at its sole discretion based primarily on its analysis of our balance sheet strength, operating performance and business profile. Factors which may affect such an analysis include:
if we change our business practices from our organizational business plan in a manner that no longer supports A.M. Best’s initial rating;
if unfavorable financial or market trends impact us;
if our losses exceed our loss reserves;
if we are unable to retain our senior management and other key personnel;
if our investment portfolio incurs significant losses; or
if A.M. Best alters its capital adequacy assessment methodology in a manner that would adversely affect Third Point Re’s rating.
If A.M. Best downgrades our rating below A- (Excellent), places us on credit watch or withdraws our rating, we could be severely limited or prevented from writing any new reinsurance contracts which would significantly and negatively affect our ability to implement our business strategy. A downgrade may also require us to establish trusts or post letters of credit for ceding company clients. In addition, almost all of our reinsurance contracts provide the client with the right to terminate the agreement or require us to transfer premiums on a funds withheld basis if our A- (Excellent) A.M. Best rating is downgraded. The contracts containing such a termination right represented approximately 86.0% of gross premiums written during 2013 and 95.8% of gross premiums written during 2012.
A significant decrease in our capital or surplus could enable certain clients to terminate reinsurance agreements or to require additional collateral.
Certain of our reinsurance contracts contain provisions that permit our clients to cancel the contract or require additional collateral in the event of a downgrade in our ratings below specified levels or a reduction of our capital or surplus below specified levels over the course of the agreement. Whether a client would exercise such cancellation rights would likely depend, among other things, on the reason the provision is triggered, the prevailing market conditions, the degree of unexpired coverage and the pricing and availability of replacement reinsurance coverage.

33



If any such provisions were to become exercisable, we cannot predict whether or how many of our clients would actually exercise such rights or the extent to which they would have a significant and negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations or future prospects but they could have a significant adverse effect on our operations.
We are dependent on key executives, the loss of whom could adversely affect our business.
Our future success depends to a significant extent on the efforts of our senior management, in particular Mr. Berger, and other key personnel, such as our chief financial officer and chief operating officer, our chief actuary and chief risk officer and our senior underwriting executives, to implement our business strategy. We believe there are only a limited number of available and qualified executives with substantial experience in our industry. Accordingly, the loss of the services of one or more of the members of our senior management, in particular Mr. Berger, or other key personnel could delay or prevent us from fully implementing our business strategy and, consequently, significantly and negatively affect our business.
We do not currently maintain key man life insurance with respect to any of our senior management. If any member of senior management dies or becomes incapacitated, or leaves the company to pursue employment opportunities elsewhere, we would be solely responsible for locating an adequate replacement for such senior management and for bearing any related cost. To the extent that we are unable to locate an adequate replacement or are unable to do so within a reasonable period of time, our business may be significantly and negatively affected.
In addition, our business operations require the services of a number of specialized employees to carry out day-to-day business operations. There can be no assurance that we can attract and retain the necessary employees to conduct our business activities on a timely basis or at all.
Our failure to obtain sufficient letter of credit facilities or to increase our letter of credit capacity on commercially acceptable terms as we grow could significantly and negatively affect our ability to implement our business strategy.
We are not licensed or admitted as a reinsurer in any jurisdiction other than Bermuda. Certain jurisdictions, including in the United States, do not permit insurance companies to take statutory credit for reinsurance obtained from unlicensed or non-admitted insurers unless appropriate security measures are implemented. Consequently, certain clients require us to obtain a letter of credit or provide other collateral through funds withheld or trust arrangements. In connection with obtaining letter of credit facilities, we are typically required to provide customary collateral to the letter of credit provider in order to secure our obligations under the facility. Our ability to provide collateral, and the costs at which we provide collateral, is primarily dependent on the composition of our investment portfolio.
Typically, letters of credit are collateralized with fixed-income securities. Banks may be willing to accept our investment portfolio as collateral, but on terms that may be less favorable to us than reinsurance companies that invest solely or predominantly in fixed-income securities. The inability to renew, maintain or obtain letters of credit collateralized by our investment portfolio may significantly limit the amount of reinsurance we can write or require us to modify our investment strategy.
We may need additional letter of credit capacity as we grow, and if we are unable to renew, maintain or increase our letter of credit facilities or are unable to do so on commercially acceptable terms, such a development could significantly and negatively affect our ability to implement our business strategy.
Our ability to pay dividends may be constrained by our holding company structure and certain regulatory and other factors.
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. is a holding company that conducts no reinsurance operations of its own. The majority of our reinsurance operations are conducted through our wholly-owned operating subsidiary, Third Point Re, and Third Point Re may also receive income relating to its shareholdings in the Catastrophe Fund. Our cash flows

34



consist primarily of dividends and other permissible payments from Third Point Re and income generated from management fees payable to the Catastrophe Fund Manager, our majority owned subsidiary that provides management services to the Catastrophe Fund. Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. depends on such payments to receive funds to meet its obligations, including the payment of any dividends and other distributions to our shareholders.
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. is indirectly subject to Bermuda regulatory constraints placed on Third Point Re and the Catastrophe Reinsurer, which is the licensed special purpose insurer that writes policies for the Catastrophe Fund. This affects our ability to pay dividends on the shares and make other payments. Under the Insurance Act, Third Point Re, as a Class 4 insurer, is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if it is in breach of its minimum solvency margin (“MSM”), enhanced capital ratio (“ECR”) or minimum liquidity ratio or if the declaration or payment of such dividend would cause such a breach. Where Third Point Re, as a Class 4 insurer, fails to meet its MSM or minimum liquidity ratio on the last day of any financial year, it is prohibited from declaring or paying any dividends during the next financial year without the approval of the BMA.
In addition, Third Point Re, as a Class 4 insurer, is prohibited from declaring or paying in any financial year dividends of more than 25% of its total statutory capital and surplus (as shown on its previous financial year’s statutory balance sheet) unless it files (at least seven days before payment of such dividends) with the BMA an affidavit signed by at least two directors (one of whom must be a Bermuda resident director if any of the insurer’s directors are resident in Bermuda) and the principal representative stating that it will continue to meet its solvency margin and minimum liquidity ratio. Where such an affidavit is filed, it shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the BMA.
The Catastrophe Reinsurer, as a special purpose insurer, is prohibited from declaring or paying any dividends during any financial year if it is in breach of its minimum solvency margin or if the declaration or payment of such dividends would cause it to fail to meet such minimum margin. If the Catastrophe Reinsurer, as a special purpose insurer, were to fail to meet its minimum solvency margin on the last day of any financial year, it would be prohibited from declaring or paying any dividends during the next financial year without the approval of the BMA.
In addition, under the Bermuda Companies Act 1981, as amended (the “Companies Act”), Bermuda companies such as Third Point Reinsurance Ltd., Third Point Re and the Catastrophe Reinsurer may not declare or pay a dividend if there are reasonable grounds for believing that the relevant Bermuda company is, or would after the payment be, unable to pay its liabilities as they become due or the realizable value of its assets would thereby be less than its liabilities.
We may need additional capital in the future in order to operate our business, and such capital may not be available to us or may not be available to us on acceptable terms. Furthermore, additional capital raising could dilute your ownership interest in our company and may cause the value of the shares to decline.
We may need to raise additional capital in the future through offerings of debt or equity securities or otherwise to:
fund liquidity needs caused by underwriting or investment losses;

replace capital lost in the event of significant reinsurance losses or adverse reserve developments;

satisfy letters of credit or guarantee bond requirements that may be imposed by our clients or by regulators;
meet rating agency or regulatory capital requirements; or
respond to competitive pressures.
Additional capital may not be available on terms favorable to us, or at all. Further, any additional capital raised through the sale of equity could dilute your ownership interest in our company and may cause the value of our shares to decline. Additional capital raised through the issuance of debt may result in creditors having rights, preferences and privileges senior or otherwise superior to those of the holders of our shares.

35



Changing climate conditions may adversely affect our financial condition, profitability or cash flows.
Climate change, to the extent it produces extreme changes in temperatures and changes in weather patterns, could affect the frequency or severity of weather events and wildfires. Further, it could reduce the affordability and availability of homeowners insurance, which could have an effect on pricing. Changes in weather patterns could also affect the frequency and severity of other natural catastrophe events to which we may be exposed. For example, due to the severe drought that impacted most of the U.S. farm belt in 2012, we suffered a $10.0 million underwriting loss on $42.5 million of earned crop premium.
Our reinsurance operations may make us vulnerable to losses from catastrophes and may cause our results of operations to vary significantly from period to period.
While Third Point Re, our Class 4 reinsurer, currently does not directly underwrite catastrophe exposed reinsurance business on an excess of loss basis, we recently launched an open-ended catastrophe reinsurance fund with an exposure to a diversified portfolio of peak zone natural catastrophe risk. Involvement in catastrophe exposed excess of loss reinsurance through our investment in the Catastrophe Fund exposes us to claims arising out of unpredictable catastrophic events, such as hurricanes, hailstorms, tornadoes, windstorms, severe winter weather, earthquakes, floods, droughts, fires, explosions, volcanic eruptions, acts of war or terrorism or political unrest and other natural or man-made disasters. The incidence and severity of catastrophes are inherently unpredictable but the loss experience of property catastrophe reinsurers has been generally characterized as low frequency and high severity. Claims from catastrophic events could reduce our earnings and cause volatility in our results of operations for any fiscal quarter or year.
In addition, we are exposed to the impact of catastrophic events in some cases through the property and casualty quota share reinsurance business of Third Point Re, as significant disasters or weather events can result in increased claims under such lines of business as auto or crop. If a natural or man-made disaster significantly increased the amount of claims payable under the types of property and casualty reinsurance written by Third Point Re, our reinsurance results of operation could be materially and adversely affected.
We depend on our clients’ evaluations of the risks associated with their insurance underwriting, which may subject us to reinsurance losses.
In most of our quota share reinsurance business we do not separately evaluate each of the original individual risks assumed under these reinsurance contracts. Therefore, we are dependent on the original underwriting decisions made by ceding companies. We are subject to the risk that the clients may not have adequately evaluated the insured risks and that the premiums ceded may not adequately compensate us for the risks we assume. We also do not separately evaluate each of the individual claims made on the underlying insurance contracts. Therefore, we are dependent on the original claims decisions made by our clients. We are subject to the risk that the client may pay invalid claims, which could result in reinsurance losses for us.
The involvement of reinsurance brokers subjects us to their credit risk.
In accordance with industry practice, we frequently pay amounts owed on claims under our policies to reinsurance brokers, and these brokers, in turn, remit these amounts to the ceding companies that have reinsured a portion of their liabilities with us. In some jurisdictions, if a broker fails to make such a payment, we might remain liable to the client for the deficiency notwithstanding the broker’s obligation to make such payment. Conversely, in certain jurisdictions, when the client pays premiums for policies to reinsurance brokers for payment to us, these premiums are considered to have been paid and the client will no longer be liable to us for these premiums, whether or not we have actually received them. Consequently, we assume a degree of credit risk associated with reinsurance brokers around the world.

36



The inability to obtain business provided from brokers could adversely affect our business strategy and results of operations.
We market our reinsurance worldwide primarily through reinsurance brokers. Business placed by our top three reinsurance brokers, Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC, Advocate Reinsurance Partners, LLC, and Aon Benfield, accounted for approximately 65.9% of our gross premiums written since inception. Affiliates of several brokers have also co-sponsored the formation of Bermuda reinsurance companies that may compete with us, and these brokers may favor their own reinsurers over other companies. Loss of all or a substantial portion of the business provided by one or more of these brokers could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We may be unable to purchase reinsurance for the liabilities we reinsure, and if we successfully purchase such reinsurance, we may be unable to collect, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
While we did not purchase retrocessional coverage in 2012, we began to do so in 2013 and may continue to do so in the future, in order to mitigate the effect of a potential concentration of losses upon our financial condition. The insolvency or inability or refusal of a reinsurer to make payments under the terms of its agreement with us could have an adverse effect on us because we remain liable to our client. From time to time, market conditions have limited, and in some cases have prevented, reinsurers from obtaining the types and amounts of retrocession that they consider adequate for their business needs. Accordingly, we may not be able to obtain our desired amounts of retrocessional coverage or negotiate terms that we deem appropriate or acceptable or obtain retrocession from entities with satisfactory creditworthiness. Our failure to establish adequate retrocessional arrangements or the failure of our retrocessional arrangements to protect us from overly concentrated risk exposure could significantly and negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Currency fluctuations could result in exchange rate losses and negatively impact our business.
Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar. However, starting in 2014 we will write a portion of our business and receive premiums in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. In addition, our investment manager, Third Point LLC, invests a portion of our portfolio in assets denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Consequently, we may experience exchange rate losses to the extent our foreign currency exposure is not hedged or is not sufficiently hedged, which could significantly and negatively affect our business. If we do seek to hedge our foreign currency exposure through the use of forward foreign currency exchange contracts or currency swaps, we may be subject to the risk that our counterparties to the arrangements fail to perform.
Our ability to implement our business strategy could be delayed or adversely affected by Bermuda employment restrictions relating to the ability to obtain and retain work permits for key employees in Bermuda.
Under Bermuda law, non-Bermudians (other than spouses of Bermudians) may not engage in any gainful occupation in Bermuda without an appropriate governmental work permit. Our success may depend in part on the continued services of key employees in Bermuda, and none of our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer and chief operating officer, our chief actuary and chief risk officer or our senior underwriting executives are Bermudians or spouses of Bermudians. A work permit may be granted or renewed upon showing that, after proper public advertisement, no Bermudian (or spouse of a Bermudian or a holder of a permanent resident’s certificate or holder of a working resident’s certificate) is available who meets the minimum standards reasonably required by the employer. A work permit is issued with an expiry date (up to ten years) and no assurances can be given that any work permit will be issued or, if issued, renewed upon the expiration of the relevant term. If work permits are not obtained, or are not renewed, for our principal employees, we would lose their services, which could materially affect our businesses.

37



Risks Relating to Our Investment Strategy and Investment Manager
We have limited control over how our investment portfolio is allocated, and its performance depends on the ability of our investment manager, Third Point LLC, to select and manage appropriate investments.
We have engaged Third Point LLC to act as our exclusive investment manager for substantially all of our investment portfolio and to recommend appropriate investment opportunities. Although Third Point LLC is contractually obligated to follow our investment guidelines, we cannot assure shareholders as to exactly how assets will be allocated to different investment opportunities, including long and short positions and derivatives trading, which could increase the level of risk in our investment.
The performance of our investment portfolio depends to a great extent on the ability of Third Point LLC, as our investment manager to select and manage appropriate investments. We have entered into an investment management agreement with Third Point LLC which terminates on December 22, 2016 and is subject to automatic renewal for additional successive three-year terms unless a party notifies the other parties at least six months prior to the end of a term that it wishes to terminate the investment management agreement at the end of such term. We have limited ability to terminate the investment management agreement earlier. We cannot assure you that Third Point LLC will be successful in meeting our investment objectives. The failure of Third Point LLC to perform adequately could significantly and negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The historical performance of Third Point LLC should not be considered as indicative of the future results of our investment portfolio or of our future results or of any returns expected on our common shares.
The historical returns of the funds managed by Third Point LLC are not directly linked to returns on our common shares. Although as our investment manager, Third Point LLC has agreed to invest our portfolio on substantially the same basis as Third Point LLC’s hedge funds, results for our investment portfolio could differ from results of the funds managed by Third Point LLC as a result of restrictions imposed by our investment guidelines. In addition, even if our investment portfolio generates investment income in a given period, our overall performance could be adversely affected by losses generated by our reinsurance operations. Poor performance of our investment portfolio will cause a decline in our revenue from that portfolio and will therefore have a negative effect on our financial performance.
Moreover, with respect to the historical performance of funds or accounts managed by Third Point LLC, including our investment portfolio:
the historical performance of funds managed by Third Point LLC should not be considered indicative of the future results that should be expected from our investment portfolio; and

the returns of funds managed by Third Point LLC have benefited historically from investment opportunities and general market conditions that currently may not exist and may not repeat themselves, and there can be no assurance that Third Point LLC will be able to avail itself of profitable investment opportunities in the future.
The risks associated with Third Point LLC’s strategy in managing our investment portfolio may be substantially greater than the investment risks faced by other reinsurers with whom we compete.
We may derive a significant portion of our income from our investment portfolio. As a result, our operating results depend in part on the performance of our investment portfolio. We cannot assure you that Third Point LLC, as our investment manager, will successfully structure our investments in relation to our anticipated liabilities. Failure to do so could force us to liquidate investments at a significant loss or at prices that are not optimal, which could significantly and adversely affect our financial results.

38



The risks associated with Third Point LLC’s investment strategy may be substantially greater than the risks associated with traditional fixed-income investment strategies employed by many reinsurers with whom we compete. Third Point LLC makes investments globally, in both developed and emerging markets, in all sectors, and in equity, credit, commodity, currency, option and other instruments with a focus on event-driven situations, in which Third Point LLC believes that a catalyst, either intrinsic or extrinsic, will unlock value or alter the lens through which the greater market values a particular investment. Making long equity investments in an up or rising market may increase the risk of not generating profits on these investments and we may incur losses if the market declines. Similarly, making short equity investments in a down or falling market may increase the risk of not generating profits on these investments and we may incur losses if the market rises. The market price of our common shares may be volatile and the risk of loss may be greater when compared with other reinsurance companies.
In addition to risks associated with volatility in our portfolio, although we conduct our business through our Class 4 Bermuda licensed insurance company as an operating reinsurance business actively engaged in writing property and casualty coverage, because our investment portfolio as managed by Third Point LLC may include a very small number of futures, options on futures, swaps and other commodity interests from time to time, we are exposed to the risk that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) could assert that our business has been operated for the purpose of trading commodity interests and we are, therefore, a commodity pool. If this were to occur, our investment strategy and our business could be disrupted as we would be required to have a registered commodity pool operator in order to continue to include investments in commodity interests in our investment portfolio. Registered commodity pool operators are subject to disclosure, reporting and recordkeeping requirements with respect to the pools they operate. In addition, if it were established that we were a commodity pool, the CFTC could pursue remedies against the party or parties it deems to be the commodity pool operator, and we could under certain circumstances be required to indemnify those individuals or entities.
The termination by Third Point LLC of our investment management agreement at the end of its term or any successive term could materially adversely affect our investment results.
We depend upon Third Point LLC, our investment manager, to implement our investment strategy. The investment management agreement, which terminates on December 22, 2016, is subject to automatic renewal for additional successive three-year terms unless a party notifies the other parties at least six months prior to the end of a term that it wishes to terminate the investment management agreement at the end of such term. If Third Point LLC chooses to terminate the investment management agreement at the end of such term, there is no assurance that we could find a suitable replacement.
Potential conflicts of interest with Third Point LLC may exist that could adversely affect us.
Neither Third Point LLC nor its principals, including Daniel S. Loeb, who is one of our shareholders, are obligated to devote any specific amount of time to our affairs. Affiliates of Third Point LLC manage, and expect to continue to manage, other client accounts, some of which have objectives similar to ours, including collective investment vehicles managed by Third Point LLC’s affiliates and in which Third Point LLC or its affiliates may have an equity interest. Pursuant to our investment management agreement with Third Point LLC, Third Point LLC has the exclusive right to manage our investment portfolio and is required to follow our investment guidelines and act in a manner that is fair and equitable in allocating investment opportunities to us, but the agreement does not otherwise impose any specific obligations or requirements concerning allocation of time, effort or investment opportunities to us or any restriction on the nature or timing of investments for our account and for Third Point LLC’s own account or other accounts that Third Point LLC or its affiliates may manage. Third Point LLC’s interest and the interests of its affiliates, may at times conflict, possibly to Third Point LLC's detriment, which may potentially adversely affect our investment opportunities and returns.

39



Our investment portfolio may contain large positions which could result in large losses.
Our investment guidelines provide that as our investment manager, Third Point LLC may commit up to 15% of our assets under management to any one investment. Our investment portfolio could be subject to significant losses if it holds a relatively large position in a single issuer, industry, market or a particular type of investment that declines in value, and the losses could increase even further if the investments cannot be liquidated without adverse market reaction or are otherwise adversely affected by changes in market conditions or circumstances. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the net exposure of our portfolio was 87% and 63%, respectively, and the largest ten long and short positions comprised an aggregate of 40% and 11% and 41% and 24%, respectively, of our investment portfolio. Since our investment portfolio may not be widely diversified at times, it may be subject to more rapid changes in value than would be the case if the investment portfolio were required to maintain a wide diversification among companies, securities and types of securities.
We are exposed to credit risk from the possibility that counterparties may default on their obligations.
To the extent that transactions in our investment portfolio are entered into directly and not through a broker or clearinghouse, including, but not limited to, forward foreign currency transactions, swap transactions, and the purchase and sale of bonds and other fixed income securities directly from the current holder thereof, we must rely on the creditworthiness of the counterparty to the extent it is unable to deliver the promised asset or cash flows in the case of cash settled transactions, net of any collateral that has been posted by or to the counterparty. The bankruptcy or insolvency of these counterparties could also result in a loss of any collateral posted against these transactions.
In addition, any prime broker or custodian through whom transactions are effected in our investment portfolio will each have a lien over assets held in a margin account with such counterparty. Further, should a prime broker or custodian become insolvent, those assets may become unavailable for redemption and potentially classified as belonging to the defaulting party. The insolvency of any such prime broker or custodian could result in the loss of a substantial portion or all of the assets held with such counterparty. Assets which are deposited with brokers as collateral against margin loss may become available to the creditors of the brokers in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of the broker to the extent that it is needed to satisfy obligations to the insolvent party. Any reduction in our assets as a result of a default by a prime broker could negatively affect the net asset value of our investment portfolio.
If Third Point LLC’s risk management systems are ineffective, we may be exposed to material unanticipated losses.
Third Point LLC continually refines its risk management techniques, strategies and assessment methods. However, its risk management techniques and strategies do not fully mitigate the risk exposure of its funds and managed accounts, including our investment portfolio, in all economic or market environments, or against all types of risk, including risks that they might fail to identify or anticipate. Some of Third Point LLC’s strategies for managing risk are based upon its use of historical market behavior statistics. Any failures in Third Point LLC’s risk management techniques and strategies to accurately quantify such risk exposure could limit the risk-adjusted returns of our investment portfolio. In addition, any risk management failures could cause losses in the portfolios managed by Third Point LLC, including our managed account, to be significantly greater than the historical measures predict. Third Point LLC’s approach to managing those risks could prove insufficient, exposing us to material unanticipated losses in our investment portfolio.
In managing our investment portfolio, Third Point LLC may trade on margin and use other forms of financial leverage, which could potentially adversely affect our revenues.
Our investment guidelines provide Third Point LLC with the ability to trade on margin and use other forms of financial leverage. Fluctuations in the market value of our investment portfolio could have a disproportionately large effect in relation to our capital. As of December 31, 2013, our investment account had $3.1 million of margin debt at its brokers. A common metric used to determine financial leverage for accounts such as our investment portfolio is the “gross exposure” of our managed account. The “gross exposure” is shown as a percentage of the Net Asset Value

40



(“NAV”) of the account, and represents the market exposure in the account (long and short) versus the NAV. In other words, if the NAV of an account is $100, and the account holds securities “long” with an aggregate market exposure of $100 (100% long), and has sold short securities with an aggregate market exposure of $25 (25% short), then the gross exposure would be 125% (i.e., $125 of investments against $100 of NAV). As of December 31, 2013, the gross exposure of our investment portfolio was 112.0%. Any event which may adversely affect the value of positions we hold could significantly and negatively affect the net asset value of our investment portfolio and thus our results of operations.
In managing our investment portfolio, Third Point LLC engages in short sales that may subject us to unlimited loss potential.
As our investment manager, Third Point LLC routinely enters into transactions for our account in which it sells a security that we do not own, which we refer to as a short sale, in anticipation of a decline in the market value of the security. Short sales for our account theoretically will involve unlimited loss potential since the market price of securities sold short may continuously increase. If the market price of the subject security increases considerably, Third Point LLC might have to cover short sales at suboptimal prices. As of December 31, 2013, short exposure in our investment portfolio was $401.0 million over 126 debt, equity and index positions, including $20.5 million over nine positions in the equity portfolio.
Third Point LLC’s representatives’ service on boards and committees may place trading restrictions on our investments.
Third Point LLC may from time to time place its or its affiliates’ representatives on creditors’ committees or boards of certain companies in which our portfolio is invested. While such representation may enable Third Point LLC to enhance the sale value of our investments, it may also place trading restrictions on our investments.
As of the date hereof, representatives of Third Point LLC sat on the board of directors of Enphase Energy, Inc., whose securities are publicly traded and included in our investment portfolio.
The ability to use ‘‘soft dollars’’ may provide Third Point LLC with an incentive to select certain brokers that may take into account benefits to be received by Third Point LLC.
Under certain circumstances and subject to compliance with the safe harbor provided by section 28(e) of the Exchange Act, Third Point LLC is entitled to use so-called “soft dollars” generated by commissions paid in connection with transactions for our investment portfolio to pay for certain categories of expenses relating to research and related services provide by brokers. Soft dollars are a means of paying brokerage firms for their services through commission revenue, rather than through direct payments. Third Point LLC’s right to use soft dollars may give Third Point LLC an incentive to select brokers or dealers for our transactions, or to negotiate commission rates or other execution terms, in a manner that takes into account the soft dollar benefits received by Third Point LLC rather than giving exclusive consideration to the interests of our investment portfolio and, accordingly, may create a conflict.
Our investment management agreement has limited termination provisions.
Our investment management agreement with Third Point LLC has limited termination provisions which restrict our ability to manage our investment portfolio outside of Third Point LLC. Because the investment management agreement contains exclusivity and limited termination provisions, we are unable to use investment managers other than Third Point LLC for so long as the agreement is in effect. The investment management agreement was entered into on December 22, 2011 and has an initial term of five years, subject to automatic renewal for additional successive three-year terms unless a party notifies the other parties at least six months prior to the end of a term that it wishes to terminate the investment management agreement at the end of such term. We may also terminate the investment management agreement upon the death, long-term disability or retirement of Daniel S. Loeb, or the occurrence of other circumstances in which Mr. Loeb is no longer directing the investment program of Third Point LLC.

41



We may also withdraw as participants under the investment management agreement prior to the expiration of the investment management agreement’s term at any time only “for cause”, which is defined as:
a material violation of applicable law relating to Third Point LLC’s advisory business;

Third Point LLC’s fraud, gross negligence, willful misconduct or reckless disregard of its obligations under the investment management agreement;

a material breach by Third Point LLC of our investment guidelines that is not cured within a 15-day period;

a conviction or, a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a felony or a crime affecting the asset management business of Third Point LLC by certain senior officers of Third Point LLC;

any act of fraud, material misappropriation, material dishonesty, embezzlement, or similar conduct against or involving us by senior officers of Third Point LLC; or

a formal administrative or other legal proceeding before the SEC, the CFTC, FINRA, or any other U.S. or non-U.S. regulatory or self-regulatory organization against Third Point LLC or certain key personnel which would likely have a material adverse effect on us.
In addition, we may withdraw as a participant under the investment management agreement prior to the expiration of its term if our portfolio underperforms as measured against specified benchmarks.
We may not withdraw or terminate the investment management agreement on the basis of performance other than as provided above. If we become dissatisfied with the results of the investment performance of Third Point LLC as our investment manager but the contractually specified termination threshold has not been met, we will be unable to hire new investment managers until the investment management agreement expires by its terms or is terminated for cause.
Certain of our investments may have limited liquidity and lack valuation data, which could create a conflict of interest.
Our investment guidelines provide Third Point LLC, as our investment manager, with the flexibility to invest in certain securities with limited liquidity or no public market. This lack of liquidity may adversely affect the ability of Third Point LLC to execute trade orders at desired prices. To the extent that Third Point LLC invests our investable assets in securities or instruments for which market quotations or other independent pricing sources are not readily available, under the terms of the investment management agreement the valuation of such securities and instruments for purposes of compensation to Third Point LLC will be determined by Third Point LLC, whose determination, subject to audit verification, will be conclusive and binding in the absence of bad faith or manifest error. Because the investment management agreement gives Third Point LLC the power to determine the value of securities with no readily discernible market value, and because the calculation of Third Point LLC’s fee is based on the value of the investment account, a conflict may exist or arise.
The U.S. and global economic downturns could harm the performance of our investment portfolio, our liquidity and financial condition and our share price.
Volatility in the United States and other securities markets may adversely affect our investment portfolio. The ability of Third Point LLC to manage our investment portfolio profitably is dependent upon conditions in the global financial markets and economic and geopolitical conditions throughout the world that are outside of our control and difficult to predict. Factors such as equity prices, equity market volatility, asset or market correlations, interest rates, counterparty risks, availability of credit, inflation rates, economic uncertainty, changes in laws or regulation (including

42



laws relating to the financial markets generally or the taxation or regulation of the hedge fund industry), trade barriers, commodity prices, interest rates, currency exchange rates and controls, and national and international political circumstances (including governmental instability, wars, terrorist acts or security operations) can have a material impact on the value of our investment portfolio.
If Third Point LLC, as our investment manager, fails to react appropriately to difficult market, economic and geopolitical conditions, our investment portfolio could incur material losses.
Third Point LLC’s use of hedging and derivative transactions in executing trades for our account may not be successful, which could materially adversely affect our investment results.
In managing our investment portfolio, Third Point LLC may utilize various financial instruments both for investment purposes and for risk management purposes in order to protect against possible changes in the market value of our investment portfolio resulting from fluctuations in the securities markets and changes in interest rates, protect unrealized gains in the value of our investment portfolio, facilitate the sale of any such investments, enhance or preserve returns, spreads or gains on any investment in our investment portfolio, hedge the interest rate or currency exchange rate on certain liabilities or assets, protect against any increase in the price of any securities Third Point LLC anticipates purchasing for our account at a later date or for any other reason that Third Point LLC, as our investment manager, deems appropriate. The success of such hedging strategy will be subject to Third Point LLC’s ability to correctly assess the degree of correlation between the performance of the instruments used in the hedging strategy and the performance of the investments in the portfolio being hedged. Since the characteristics of many securities change as markets change or time passes, the success of such hedging strategy will also be subject to Third Point LLC’s ability to continually recalculate, readjust and execute hedges in an efficient and timely manner. While Third Point LLC may enter into hedging transactions for our account to seek to reduce risk, such transactions may result in a poorer overall performance for our investment portfolio than if it had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. For a variety of reasons, in managing our investment portfolio Third Point LLC may not seek to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent Third Point LLC from achieving the intended hedge or expose our investment portfolio to risk of loss.
Our investment portfolio includes investments in mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities, whose investment characteristics differ from corporate debt securities.
Our investment portfolio may from time to time be invested in mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities, whose investment characteristics differ from corporate debt securities. As of December 31, 2013, the fair value of asset-backed securities in our investment portfolio was $325.5 million. Among the major differences are that interest and principal payments are made more frequently, usually monthly, and that principal may be prepaid at any time because the underlying mortgage loans or other assets generally may be prepaid at any time. Mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities may also be subject to call risk and extension risk. For example, because homeowners have the option to prepay their mortgages, the duration of a security backed by home mortgages can either shorten or lengthen.
In general, if interest rates on new mortgage loans fall sufficiently below the interest rates on existing outstanding mortgage loans, the rate of prepayment would be expected to increase. Conversely, if mortgage loan interest rates rise above the interest rates on existing outstanding mortgage loans, the rate of prepayment would be expected to decrease. In either case, a change in the prepayment rate can result in losses to investors. If our investment portfolio includes securities that are subordinated to other interests in the same mortgage pool, we may only receive payments after the pool’s obligations to other investors have been satisfied. In addition, our investment portfolio may, from time to time, be invested in structures commonly known as “Re-REMICS,” in which case a trust is further split between a senior tranche and a junior tranche. Third Point LLC usually buys the junior tranche for its funds and the accounts it manages in such circumstances. An unexpectedly high rate of default on mortgages held by a mortgage pool may limit substantially the pool’s ability to make payments to holders of such securities, reducing the value of those securities or rendering them worthless. The risk of such defaults is generally higher in the case of mortgage pools that include

43



“sub-prime” mortgages. Changes in laws and other regulatory developments relating to mortgage loans may impact the investments of our portfolio in mortgage-backed securities in the future.
Our investment portfolio may include investments in securities of issuers based outside the United States, including emerging markets, which may be riskier than securities of U.S. issuers.
Under our investment guidelines, Third Point LLC may invest in securities of issuers organized or based outside the United States that may involve heightened risks in comparison to the risks of investing in domestic securities, including unfavorable changes in currency rates and exchange control regulations, reduced and less reliable information about issuers and markets, less stringent accounting standards, illiquidity of securities and markets, higher brokerage commissions, transfer taxes and custody fees, local economic or political instability and greater market risk in general. In particular, investing in securities of issuers located in emerging market countries involves additional risks, such as exposure to economic structures that are generally less diverse and mature than, and to political systems that can be expected to have less stability than, those of developed countries. Other characteristics of emerging market countries that may affect investment in their markets include certain national policies that may restrict investment by foreigners in issuers or industries deemed sensitive to relevant national interests and the absence of developed legal structures governing private and foreign investments and private property. The typically small size of the markets for securities of issuers located in emerging markets and the possibility of a low or nonexistent volume of trading in those securities may also result in a lack of liquidity and in price volatility of those securities. In addition, dividend and interest payments from and capital gains in respect of certain foreign securities may be subject to foreign taxes that may or may not be reclaimable. Finally, many transactions in these markets are executed as a “total return swap” or other derivative transaction with a financial institution counterparty, and as a result our investment portfolio has counterparty credit risk with respect to such counterparty.
In addition, within the Euro-zone, there remains significant market concern as to the potential default of government issuers. In addition to European sovereign debt, we have other assets in our investment portfolio that are Euro-denominated. As of December 31, 2013, approximately $97.5 million by market exposure of our invested assets were denominated in Euros. A devaluation of the Euro could lead to a significant decline in the value of these assets. Should governments default on their obligations, there could be a negative impact on both our direct holdings within our investment portfolio as well as non-government issues held within the country of default.
Third Point LLC’s role as an engaged investor in special situation and distressed investments may subject us or Third Point Re to increased risks including the incurrence of additional legal or other expenses.
As our investment manager, Third Point LLC may invest a portion of our investment portfolio in special situation companies. This generally involves investments in securities of companies in event-driven special situations such as acquisitions, tender offers, bankruptcies, recapitalizations, spinoffs, corporate and financial restructurings, litigation or other liability impairments, turnarounds, management changes, consolidating industries and other catalyst-oriented situations. Third Point LLC may also invest our portfolio in securities of issuers in weak financial condition, experiencing poor operating results, having substantial financial needs or negative net worth or facing special competitive or product obsolescence issues or that are involved in bankruptcy reorganization proceedings, liquidation or other corporate restructuring. Investments of this type involve substantial financial business risks that can result in substantial or total losses. Among the problems involved in assessing and making investments in troubled issuers is that fact that it frequently may be difficult to obtain information as to the condition of such issuer. The market prices of the securities of such issuers are also subject to abrupt and erratic market movements and above average price volatility and the spread between the bid and asked prices of such securities may be greater than normally expected. It may take a number of years for the market prices of such securities to reflect their intrinsic values, if at all. It is anticipated that some of such securities may not be widely traded, and that a position in such securities may be substantial in relation to the market for such securities.
As a consequence of Third Point LLC’s role as an engaged investor in special situation and distressed investments, our investment portfolio may be subject to increased risk of incurring additional legal, indemnification or other expenses, even if we are not named in any action. In distressed or special situations litigation often follows

44



when disgruntled shareholders, creditors, and other parties seek to recover losses from poorly performing investments. The enhanced litigation risk for distressed companies is further elevated by the potential that Third Point LLC may have controlling or influential positions in the companies. Some of the claims that can be asserted against Third Point LLC as a distressed investor include: aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty; equitable subordination of the investor's claims; recharacterization of the investor’s claims; and preference or fraudulent transfer claims. Third Point LLC’s use of short-selling for its funds and the accounts it manages has subjected, and may continue to subject Third Point LLC and the short sellers to increased risk of litigation. Lawsuits can be brought against short sellers of a company’s stock to discourage short selling. Among other claims, these suits may allege libel, conspiracy, and market manipulation.
Third Point LLC’s diminution or loss of service or loss of key employees could materially adversely affect our investment results.
We depend upon Third Point LLC, as our investment manager, to implement our investment strategy. All investment decisions with respect to our investment portfolio are made by Third Point LLC, subject to our investment guidelines, under the general supervision of Daniel S. Loeb. As a result, the success of our investment strategy depends largely upon the abilities of Mr. Loeb. While we may terminate the investment management agreement with Third Point LLC upon the death, long-term disability or retirement of Mr. Loeb, or the occurrence of other circumstances in which Mr. Loeb is no longer directing the investment program of Third Point LLC, no assurance can be given that a suitable replacement could be found.
The compensation arrangements of Third Point LLC, as our investment manager, may create an incentive to effect transactions that are risky or speculative.
Our investment management agreement provides for the following two forms of compensation to be paid to Third Point LLC and TP GP:
Third Point LLC is entitled to a management fee of 2% annually (less the Founders payment paid to the Lead Investors and Dowling, as described in our investment management agreement), charged monthly, based on net assets under management; and

TP GP is entitled to performance compensation based on the appreciation, including unrealized appreciation, in the value of our investment portfolio equal to 20% of net profits, subject to a loss carryforward provision.
While the performance compensation arrangement provides that losses will be carried forward as an offset against net profits in subsequent periods, Third Point LLC generally will not otherwise be penalized for realized losses or decreases in the value of our portfolio. These performance compensation arrangements may create an incentive for Third Point LLC as our investment manager to engage in transactions that focus on the potential for short-term gains rather than long-term growth or that are particularly risky or speculative.
Increased regulation or scrutiny of alternative investment advisers and certain trading methods such as short selling may affect Third Point LLC’s ability to manage our investment portfolio or affect our business reputation.
The regulatory environment for investment managers is evolving, and changes in the regulation of managers may adversely affect the ability of Third Point LLC to effect transactions in our investment portfolio that utilize leverage or to pursue its trading strategies in managing our investment portfolio. In addition, the securities and futures markets are subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations and margin requirements. The SEC, other regulators and self-regulatory organizations and exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of market emergencies. The regulation of derivatives transactions and funds that engage in such transactions is an evolving area of law and is subject to modification by government and judicial action. Any future regulatory change could have a significant negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

45



In addition, a number of states and municipal pension plans have adopted so-called “pay-to-play” laws, regulations or policies which prohibit, restrict or require disclosure of payments to (and/or certain contacts with) state officials by individuals and entities seeking to do business with state entities, including investments by public retirement funds. The SEC also has adopted rules that, among other things, prohibit an investment adviser from providing advisory services for compensation to a government client for a period of up to two years after the adviser or certain of its executives or employees make a contribution to certain elected officials or candidates. If Third Point LLC, its employees or affiliates or any service providers acting on their behalf, including, without limitation, a placement agent, fail to comply with such pay-to-play laws, regulations or policies, such non-compliance could have an adverse effect on Third Point LLC and our investment portfolio.
As our investment manager, Third Point LLC routinely engages in short selling for our account in managing our investments. Short sale transactions have been subject to increased regulatory scrutiny, including the imposition of restrictions on short selling certain securities and reporting requirements. Third Point LLC’s ability to execute a short selling strategy in managing our investment portfolio may be materially and adversely impacted by temporary or new permanent rules, interpretations, prohibitions, and restrictions adopted in response to these adverse market events. Temporary restrictions or prohibitions on short selling activity may be imposed by regulatory authorities with little or no advance notice and may impact prior and future trading activities of our investment portfolio. Additionally, the SEC, its non-U.S. counterparts, other governmental authorities or self-regulatory organizations may at any time promulgate permanent rules or interpretations consistent with such temporary restrictions or that impose additional or different permanent or temporary limitations or prohibitions. The SEC might impose different limitations or prohibitions on short selling from those imposed by various non-U.S. regulatory authorities. These different regulations, rules or interpretations might have different effective periods.
Regulatory authorities may, from time to time, impose restrictions that adversely affect our ability to borrow certain securities in connection with short sale transactions. In addition, traditional lenders of securities may be less likely to lend securities under certain market conditions. As a result, Third Point LLC may not be able to effectively pursue a short selling strategy due to a limited supply of securities available for borrowing. We may also incur additional costs in connection with short sale transactions effected in our investment portfolio, including in the event that Third Point LLC is required to enter into a borrowing arrangement for our account in advance of any short sales. Moreover, the ability to continue to borrow a security is not guaranteed and our account will be subject to strict delivery requirements. The inability to deliver securities within the required time frame may subject us to mandatory close out by the executing broker-dealer. A mandatory close out may subject us to unintended costs and losses. Certain action or inaction by third parties, such as executing broker-dealers or clearing broker-dealers, may materially impact our ability to effect short sale transactions in our investment portfolio.
An increase in Third Point LLC’s assets under management may adversely affect the returns of our investment portfolio.
It is possible that if the amount of assets Third Point LLC manages for us, in its funds and for other accounts it manages were to increase materially, it could be more difficult for Third Point LLC to invest profitably for those accounts because of the difficulty of trading larger positions without adversely affecting prices and managing risks associated with larger positions. In addition, there can be no assurance that there will be appropriate investment opportunities to accommodate future increase in assets under management, which may force Third Point LLC to modify its investment decisions for the accounts it manages because it cannot deploy all the assets in a manner it desires. Furthermore, due to the overlap of strategies and investments across many of the portfolios managed by Third Point LLC, including its hedge funds, the accounts may be adversely affected in the event of rapid or large liquidations of investment positions held by the accounts due to a lack of liquidity resulting from large position sizes in the same investments held by the other accounts. While the hedge funds managed by Third Point LLC are currently closed for new investment subject to limited exceptions. Third Point LLC may revisit this decision based on market conditions and any increase in assets under management could adversely affect the returns of our investment portfolio.

46



Risks Relating to Insurance and Other Regulations
Any suspension or revocation of Third Point Re’s reinsurance license would materially impact our ability to do business and implement our business strategy.
Our subsidiary Third Point Re is licensed as a reinsurer only in Bermuda and we do not plan to seek licenses in any other jurisdiction. The suspension or revocation of Third Point Re’s license to do business as a reinsurance company in Bermuda for any reason would mean that we would not be able to enter into any new reinsurance contracts until the suspension ended or Third Point Re became licensed in another jurisdiction. Any such suspension or revocation of our license would negatively impact our reputation in the reinsurance marketplace and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
If we become subject to insurance statutes and regulations in jurisdictions other than Bermuda or there is a change to Bermuda law or regulations or application of Bermuda law or regulations, there could be a significant and negative impact on our business.
Third Point Re, our wholly owned operating subsidiary, is a registered Bermuda Class 4 insurer. As such, it is subject to regulation and supervision in Bermuda. Bermuda insurance statutes, regulations and policies of the BMA require Third Point Re, among other things:
maintain a minimum level of capital, surplus and liquidity;
satisfy solvency standards;
restrict dividends and distributions;
obtain prior approval of ownership and transfer of shares;
maintain a principal office and appoint and maintain a principal representative in Bermuda; and
provide for the performance of certain periodic examinations of Third Point Re and its financial condition.
These statutes and regulations may, in effect, restrict our ability to write reinsurance policies, to distribute funds and to pursue our investment strategy.
The process of obtaining licenses is very time consuming and costly, and we may not be able to become licensed in a jurisdiction other than Bermuda should we choose to do so. The modification of the conduct of our business resulting from our becoming licensed in certain jurisdictions could significantly and negatively affect our business. In addition, our inability to comply with insurance statutes and regulations could significantly and adversely affect our business by limiting our ability to conduct business as well as subjecting us to penalties and fines.
In addition, the BMA could revoke or suspend Third Point Re’s license in certain circumstances, including circumstances in which (i) it is shown that false, misleading or inaccurate information has been supplied to the BMA by Third Point Re or on its behalf for the purposes of any provision of the Insurance Act; (ii) we have ceased to carry on business; (iii) Third Point Re has persistently failed to pay fees due under the Insurance Act; (iv) Third Point Re has been shown to have not complied with a condition attached to its registration or with a requirement made of us under the Insurance Act; (v) we are convicted of an offence against a provision of the Insurance Act; (vi) Third Point Re is, in the opinion of the BMA, found not to have been carrying on business in accordance with sound insurance principles; or (vii) if any of the minimum criteria for registration under the Insurance Act is not or will not have been fulfilled. If the BMA suspended or revoked Third Point Re’s license we could lose our exception under the Investment Company Act. See “-We are subject to the risk of becoming an investment company under U.S. federal securities law.”
We are subject to the risk of becoming an investment company under U.S. federal securities law.
The U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the “Investment Company Act”, regulates certain companies that invest in or trade securities. We rely on an exception under the Investment Company Act that is available

47



to a company organized and regulated as a foreign insurance company which is engaged primarily and predominantly in the reinsurance of risks on insurance agreements. The law in this area has not been well developed and there is a lack of guidance as to the meaning of “primarily and predominantly” under the relevant exception under the Investment Company Act. For example, there is no standard for the amount of premiums that need be written relative to the level of a company’s capital in order to qualify for the exception. If this exception were deemed inapplicable, we would have to seek to register under the Investment Company Act as an investment company, which, under the Investment Company Act, would require an order from the SEC. Our inability to obtain such an order could have a significant adverse impact on our business.
Assuming that we were permitted to register as an investment company, registered investment companies are subject to extensive, restrictive and potentially adverse regulation relating to, among other things, operating methods, management, capital structure, our ability to raise additional debt and equity securities or issue stock options or warrants (which could impact our ability to compensate key employees), financial leverage, dividends, board of director composition and transactions with affiliates. Accordingly, if we were required to register as an investment company we would not be able to operate our business as it is currently conducted, nor would we be permitted to have many of the relationships that we have with our affiliated companies. Accordingly, we likely would not be permitted to engage Third Point LLC as our investment manager, unless we obtained board and shareholder approvals under the Investment Company Act. If Third Point LLC were not our investment manager, we may be required to liquidate our investment portfolio and we would seek to identify and retain another investment manager with a similar investment philosophy. If we could not identify or retain such an advisor, we would be required to make substantial modifications to our investment strategy. Any such changes to our investment strategy could significantly and negatively impact our investment results, financial condition and our ability to implement our business strategy.
If at any time it were established that we had been operating as an investment company in violation of the Investment Company Act, there would be a risk, among other material adverse consequences, that we could become subject to monetary penalties or injunctive relief, or both, that we could be unable to enforce contracts with third parties or that third parties could seek to obtain rescission of transactions undertaken during the period in which it was established that we were an unregistered investment company. If, subsequently, we were not permitted or were unable to register as an investment company, it is likely that we would be forced to cease operations.
To the extent that the laws and regulations change in the future so that contracts we write are deemed not to be reinsurance contracts, we will be at greater risk of not qualifying for the Investment Company Act exception. Additionally, it is possible that our classification as an investment company would result in the suspension or revocation of our reinsurance license.
Insurance regulators in the United States or elsewhere may review our activities and claim that we are subject to additional licensing requirements.
We do not presently expect that we will be admitted to do business in any jurisdiction other than Bermuda. In general, Bermuda insurance statutes, regulations and the policies of the BMA are less restrictive than United States state insurance statutes and regulations. We cannot assure you that insurance regulators in the United States or elsewhere will not review our activities and claim that we are subject to such jurisdiction’s licensing requirements. In addition, we will be subject to indirect regulatory requirements imposed by jurisdictions that may limit our ability to provide reinsurance. For example, our ability to write reinsurance may be subject, in certain cases, to arrangements satisfactory to applicable regulatory bodies and proposed legislation and regulations may have the effect of imposing additional requirements upon, or restricting the market for, non-U.S. reinsurers such as us.
If in the future we were to become subject to regulation under the laws of any state in the United States or the laws of the United States or of any other country, we may consider various alternatives to our operations. If we attempt to become licensed in another jurisdiction, for instance, we may not be able to do so and the modification of the conduct of our business or the non-compliance with insurance statutes and regulations could significantly and negatively affect our business.

48



Our reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to minimum capital and surplus requirements, and our failure to meet these requirements could subject us to regulatory action.
In 2008, the BMA introduced risk-based capital standards for insurance companies as a tool to assist the BMA both in measuring risk and in determining appropriate levels of capitalization. The amended Bermuda insurance statutes and regulations pursuant to the risk-based supervisory approach required additional filings by insurers to be made to the BMA. The required statutory capital and surplus of our Bermuda-based operating subsidiary increased under the Bermuda Solvency Capital Requirement model. While Third Point Re, as operating, currently has excess capital and surplus under these new requirements, there can be no assurance that such requirement or similar regulations, in their current form or as may be amended in the future, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Any failure to meet applicable requirements or minimum statutory capital requirements could subject us to further examination or corrective action by regulators, including restrictions on dividend payments, limitations on our writing of additional business or engaging in finance activities, supervision or liquidation. Further, any changes in existing risk based capital requirements or minimum statutory capital requirements may require us to increase our statutory capital levels, which we might be unable to do.
Changes in law or regulations could cause a significant and negative impact on our reinsurance business.
From time to time, various regulatory and legislative changes have been proposed in the insurance and reinsurance industry. The extreme turmoil in the financial markets has increased the likelihood of changes in the way the financial services industry is regulated. Governmental authorities worldwide have become increasingly interested in potential risks posed by the insurance industry as a whole, and to commercial and financial systems in general. While we cannot predict the exact nature, timing or scope of possible governmental initiatives, there may be increased regulatory intervention in our industry in the future.
Our exposure to potential regulatory initiatives could be heightened by the fact that we are domiciled in, and operate exclusively from, Bermuda. Bermuda is a small jurisdiction and may be disadvantaged when participating in global or cross-border regulatory matters as compared with larger jurisdictions such as the United States or the leading European Union countries.
Because we are a Bermuda company, we are subject to changes in Bermuda law and regulation that may have an adverse impact on our operations, including through the imposition of tax liability or increased regulatory supervision. In addition, we will be exposed to any changes in the political environment in Bermuda.
The Bermuda insurance and reinsurance regulatory framework recently has become subject to increased scrutiny in many jurisdictions. As a result, the BMA has recently implemented and imposed additional requirements on the companies it regulates, such as Third Point Re, as part of its efforts to achieve equivalence under Solvency II, the EU regulatory regime which was enacted in November 2009 and which imposes new solvency and governance requirements across all EU Member States. Although Solvency II was originally supposed to have become effective by November 1, 2012, a proposed Omnibus II directive was to set revised dates for transposition and implementation of Solvency II by the EU Member States. However, there have been a series of delays in the European Parliament vote to approve the Omnibus II directive. Further delay in the implementation of Solvency II is likely, but the extent and nature of the delay is uncertain. The detail of the Solvency II project will be set out in “delegated acts” and binding technical standards which will be issued by the European Commission and will be legally binding. No official drafts for any of these measures have been released. As a result of the delay in implementation of Solvency II, it is unclear when the European Commission will take a final decision on whether or not it will recognize the solvency regime in Bermuda to be equivalent to that laid down in Solvency II.
While we cannot predict the future impact on our operations of changes in the laws and regulation to which we are or may become subject, any such changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

49



Bermuda insurance laws regarding the change of control of insurance companies may limit the acquisition of our shares.
Under Bermuda law, for so long as we have an insurance subsidiary registered under the Insurance Act, the BMA may at any time, by written notice, object to a person holding 10% or more of its common shares if it appears to the BMA that the person is not or is no longer fit and proper to be such a holder. In such a case, the BMA may require the shareholder to reduce its holding of our common shares and direct, among other things, that such shareholder’s voting rights attaching to the common shares shall not be exercisable. A person who does not comply with such a notice or direction from the BMA will be guilty of an offence. This may discourage potential acquisition proposals and may delay, deter or prevent a change of control of our Company, including through transactions, and in particular unsolicited transactions, that some or all of our shareholders might consider to be desirable.
Changes in accounting principles and financial reporting requirements could result in material changes to our reported results and financial condition.
U.S. GAAP and related financial reporting requirements are complex, continually evolving and may be subject to varied interpretation by the relevant authoritative bodies. Such varied interpretations could result from differing views related to specific facts and circumstances. Changes in U.S. GAAP and financial reporting requirements, or in the interpretation of U.S. GAAP or those requirements, could result in material changes to our reported results and financial condition. Moreover, the SEC is currently evaluating IFRS to determine whether IFRS should be incorporated into the financial reporting system for U.S. issuers. In addition, U.S. GAAP and IFRS standard setters continue to discuss possible changes to accounting for insurance contracts. Certain of these standards could result in material changes to our reported results of operation. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K for a summary of pending changes in accounting principles or financial reporting requirements that could affect our results and disclosures.
Risks Relating to Taxation
In addition to the risk factors discussed below, we advise you to read “Certain Tax Considerations” and to consult your own tax advisor regarding the tax consequences to you of your investment in our shares.
We may be subject to United States federal income taxation.
We are incorporated under the laws of Bermuda and we believe that our activities, as contemplated, will not cause us to be treated as engaging in a United States trade or business and will not cause us to be subject to current United States federal income taxation on our net income. However, because there are no definitive standards provided by the Internal Revenue Code, regulations or court decisions as to the specific activities that constitute being engaged in the conduct of a trade or business within the United States, and as any such determination is essentially factual in nature and must be made annually, we cannot assure you that the United States Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, will not successfully assert that we are engaged in a trade or business in the United States or, if applicable under the income tax treaty between the U.S. and Bermuda (the “Bermuda Treaty”), engaged in a trade or business in the United States through a permanent establishment, and thus are subject to current United States federal income taxation. If we were deemed to be engaged in a trade or business in the United States (and, if applicable under the Bermuda Treaty, were deemed to be so engaged through a permanent establishment), Third Point Re generally would become subject to United States federal income tax on its income “effectively connected” (or treated as effectively connected) with the U.S. trade or business, and would become subject to the “branch profits” tax on its earnings and profits that are both effectively connected with the U.S. trade or business and deemed repatriated out of the United States. Any such federal tax liability could materially adversely affect our results of operations.

50



United States persons who own our shares may be subject to United States federal income taxation on our undistributed earnings and may recognize ordinary income upon disposition of shares.
PFIC . Significant potential adverse United States federal income tax consequences generally apply to any United States person who owns shares in a PFIC. In general, either we or Third Point Re would be a PFIC for a taxable year if 75% or more of its income constitutes “passive income” or 50% or more of its assets were held to produce “passive income.” Passive income generally includes interest, dividends and other investment income but does not include income derived in the active conduct of an insurance business by a corporation predominantly engaged in an insurance business. This exception for insurance companies is intended to ensure that a bona fide insurance company’s income is not treated as passive income, except to the extent such income is attributable to financial reserves in excess of the reasonable needs of the insurance business. However, there is very little authority as to what constitutes the active conduct of an insurance business for purposes of the PFIC rules. The IRS has notified taxpayers in IRS Notice 2003-34 that it intends to scrutinize the activities of certain insurance companies located outside of the United States, including reinsurance companies that invest a significant portion of their assets in alternative investment strategies, to determine whether such companies qualify for the active insurance company exception in the PFIC rules.
We believe that our financial reserves are consistent with industry standards and are not in excess of the reasonable needs of our insurance business, and that we are actively engaged in insurance activities that involve sufficient transfer of risk. However, we cannot assure you the IRS will agree with our position and will not successfully assert that we do not qualify for the insurance exception. Moreover, our expectation with respect to any taxable year is based on the amount of risk that we expect to underwrite during that year. If we are unable to underwrite sufficient amount of risk for any taxable year, the Company and/or Third Point Re might be treated as a PFIC. Furthermore, in certain circumstances, we may seek to manage the volatility of our reinsurance results by writing policies that contain certain contractual terms and conditions (such as loss ratio caps), which may cause the IRS to assert that such policies lack sufficient risk transfer to constitute insurance for United States federal income tax purposes, increasing the risk that the Company and/or Third Point Re may be treated as a PFIC. Counsel to the Company and its subsidiaries (the “Group”) is not providing an opinion regarding the Group’s PFIC status due to the absence of applicable authority regarding the active insurance company exception and the dependence of the Group’s PFIC status on the actual operational results and other relevant facts for each taxable year. Prospective investors are urged to consult their own tax advisors to assess their tolerance of this risk.
Recently proposed legislation (The Tax Reform Act of 2014) would modify the insurance exception to require that, for any year (1) our premiums constitute more than 50% of our gross receipts and (2) the amount of our insurance related liabilities (generally, unearned premium reserves and loss and loss adjustment expenses) constitute more than 35% of our assets.  If enacted in its current form, no assurance can be given that we would be able to operate in a manner to satisfy these requirements in any given year.  No assurance can be given as to whether such legislation will be adopted and if so, in what form. 
If a U.S. Holder (as defined below) holds our shares during any taxable year in which the Company and Third Point Re are treated as PFICs, such shares will generally be treated as stock in a PFIC for all subsequent years. Certain elections designed to mitigate the adverse consequences of owning shares in a PFIC, including a “Protective QEF Election,” may be available. If you are a United States person, we advise you to consult your own tax advisor concerning the potential tax consequences to you under the PFIC rules, the advisability of making one of these elections and to assess your tolerance of this risk.
CFC . United States persons who, directly or indirectly or through attribution rules, own 10% or more of the voting power of our shares, which we refer to as United States 10% shareholders, may be subject to the CFC rules. Under the CFC rules, each United States 10% shareholder must annually include its pro rata share of the CFC’s “subpart F income,” even if no distributions are made. In general (subject to the special rules applicable to “related person insurance income” described below), a foreign insurance company will be treated as a CFC only if United States 10% shareholders collectively own more than 25% of the total combined voting power or total value of the company’s shares for an uninterrupted period of 30 days or more during any year. We believe that the restrictions placed on the voting power of our shares should generally prevent shareholders who acquire shares from being treated as United States 10%

51



shareholders of a CFC. We cannot assure you, however, that these rules will not apply to you. If you are a United States person we strongly urge you to consult your own tax advisor concerning the controlled foreign corporation rules.
Related Person Insurance Income . If (a) our gross income attributable to insurance or reinsurance policies pursuant to which the direct or indirect insureds are our direct or indirect United States shareholders or persons related to such United States shareholders equals or exceeds 20% of our gross insurance income in any taxable year; and (b) direct or indirect insureds and persons related to such insureds own directly or indirectly 20% or more of the voting power or value of our shares, a United States person who owns any shares directly or indirectly on the last day of the taxable year would most likely be required to include its allocable share of our related person insurance income for the taxable year in its income, even if no distributions are made. We do not expect that it is likely that either or both of the 20% gross insurance income threshold or the 20% direct or indirect ownership threshold will be met. However, we cannot assure you that this will be the case. Consequently, we cannot assure you that a person who is a direct or indirect United States shareholder will not be required to include amounts in its income in respect of related person insurance income in any taxable year.
Dispositions of Our Shares. If a United States shareholder is treated as disposing of shares in a CFC of which it is a United States 10% shareholder, or of shares in a foreign insurance corporation that has related person insurance income and in which United States persons collectively own 25% or more of the voting power or value of the company’s share capital, any gain from the disposition will generally be treated as a dividend to the extent of the United States shareholder’s portion of the corporation’s undistributed earnings and profits, as the case may be, that were accumulated during the period that the United States shareholder owned the shares. In addition, the shareholder will be required to comply with certain reporting requirements, regardless of the amount of shares owned by the direct or indirect United States shareholder. Although not free from doubt, we believe it would be reasonable for a U.S. person to take the position that these rules should not apply to dispositions of our shares because we should not have any United States 10% shareholders and will not be directly engaged in the insurance business. We cannot assure you, however, that the IRS will interpret the proposed regulations potentially applicable to such dispositions in this manner or that the proposed regulations will not be promulgated in final form in a manner that would cause these rules to apply to dispositions of our shares.
United States tax-exempt organizations who own our shares may recognize unrelated business taxable income.
A United States tax-exempt organization may recognize unrelated business taxable income if a portion of our subpart F insurance income is allocated to it. In general, subpart F insurance income will be allocated to a tax-exempt organization owning (or treated as owning) our shares if we are a CFC as discussed above and it is a United States 10% shareholder or we earn related person insurance income and the exceptions described above do not apply. We cannot assure you that United States persons holding our shares (directly or indirectly) will not be allocated subpart F insurance income. United States tax-exempt organizations should consult their own tax advisors regarding the risk of recognizing unrelated business taxable income as a result of the ownership of our shares.
We may become subject to U.S. withholding and information reporting requirements under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”) provisions.
The Foreign Account Tax Compliance provisions of the Code (“FATCA”) generally impose a 30% withholding tax regime with respect to (i) certain U.S. source income (including interest and dividends) and gross proceeds from any sale or other disposition after December 31, 2016, of property that can produce U.S. source interest or dividends (“withholdable payments”) and (ii) “passthru payments” (generally, withholdable payments and payments that are attributable to withholdable payments) made by foreign financial institutions (“FFIs”). As a general matter, FATCA was designed to require U.S. persons’ direct and indirect ownership of certain non-U.S. accounts and non-U.S. entities to be reported to the IRS. The application of the FATCA withholding rules will be phased in beginning July 1, 2014, with withholding on foreign passthru payments made by FFIs taking effect no earlier than 2017.
On December 19, 2013, the Bermuda Government entered into a “Model 2” intergovernmental agreement (“IGA”) with the United States to implement FATCA. If we and/or Third Point Re are treated as FFIs for the purposes of FATCA, under the Model 2 IGA, we and/or Third Point Re will be directed to ‘register’ with the IRS by July 1, 2014

52



and required to comply with the requirements of FATCA, including due diligence, reporting and withholding. Assuming registration and compliance with the terms of an agreement with the IRS (an “FFI Agreement”) pursuant to a Model 2 IGA, an FFI would be treated as FATCA compliant and not subject to withholding. An FFI that satisfies the eligibility, information reporting and other requirements of the IGA will not be subject to the regular FATCA reporting and withholding obligations discussed below.
If the Company and/or Third Point Re are treated as FFIs for purposes of FATCA, withholdable payments and passthru payments made to the Company and/or Third Point Re will be subject to a 30% withholding tax unless an FFI Agreement is in effect, pursuant to which the Company and/or Third Point Re would be required to provide information regarding its U.S. direct or indirect owners and to comply with other reporting, verification, due diligence and other procedures established by the IRS, including a requirement to seek waivers of non-U.S. laws that would prevent the reporting of such information. The IRS may terminate the FFI Agreement if the IRS notifies the Company and/or Third Point Re that it is out of compliance with the FFI Agreement and the Company and/or Third Point Re does not remediate the compliance failure. Even if the Company and Third Point Re are subject to an FFI Agreement, distributions to an investor that are treated as passthru payments generally will be subject to a 30% withholding tax (a) if the investor fails to provide information or take other actions required for the the Company and/or Third Point Re to comply with the FFI Agreement including, in the case of a non-U.S. investor, providing information regarding certain U.S. direct and indirect owners of the investor (and, in certain circumstances, obtaining waivers of non-U.S. law to permit such reporting), or (b) if the investor is an FFI, unless the investor (i) is subject to an FFI Agreement, (ii) establishes that an exemption applies or (iii) is required to comply with FATCA under an applicable IGA.
Under the regulations implementing FATCA, a foreign insurance company (or foreign holding company of an insurance company) that issues or is obligated to make payments with respect to an account is a foreign financial institution. For this purpose, insurance contracts treated as having “cash value” and annuity contracts issued or maintained by a financial institution are considered accounts, and certain term life insurance contracts are not considered accounts. Insurance companies that issue only property and casualty insurance contracts, or that only issue life insurance contracts lacking cash value (or that provide for limited cash value) generally would not be considered FFIs under the final regulations. However, a holding company may be treated as an FFI if it is formed in connection with or availed of by a collective investment vehicle, mutual fund, exchange traded fund, hedge fund, venture capital fund, leveraged buyout fund, or any similar investment vehicle established with an investment strategy of investing, reinvesting, or trading in financial assets. Moreover, a company may be treated as an FFI if its gross income is primarily attributable to investing, reinvesting, or trading in financial assets and the entity is managed by an FFI, or the entity functions or holds itself out as an investment vehicle established with an investment strategy of investing, reinvesting, or trading in financial assets. Even if the Company and Third Point Re are not treated as FFIs, then depending on whether the shares of the Company are treated as “regularly traded on one or more more established securities markets” under the FATCA rules and whether the income and assets of Third Point Re meet the requirements for the treatment of Third Point Re as an “active NFFE,” withholdable payments to the Company and/or Third Point Re may be subject to a 30% withholding tax unless the Company and/or Third Point Re provide information regarding its U.S. direct or indirect owners.
At this early stage, there can be no certainty as to whether the Company and/or Third Point Re will be subject to the requirements imposed on FFIs under FACTA. We will use reasonable efforts to avoid the imposition of a withholding tax under FACTA, which may include the entering into of an FFI Agreement.
Potential additional application of the Federal Insurance Excise Tax.
The IRS, in Revenue Ruling 2008-15, has formally announced its position that the U.S. federal insurance excise tax (the “FET”) is applicable (at a 1% rate on premiums) to all reinsurance cessions or retrocessions of risks by non‑U.S. insurers or reinsurers to non-U.S. reinsurers where the underlying risks are either (i) risks of a U.S. entity or individual located wholly or partly within the U.S. or (ii) risks of a non-U.S. entity or individual engaged in a trade or business in the U.S. which are located within the U.S. (“U.S. Situs Risks”), even if the FET has been paid on prior cessions of the same risks. The legal and jurisdictional basis for, and the method of enforcement of, the IRS’s position is unclear. We have not determined if the FET should be applicable with respect to risks ceded to us by, or by us to, a non-U.S. insurance company. If the FET is applicable, it should apply at a 1% rate on premium for all U.S. Situs Risks

53



ceded to us by a non-U.S. insurance company, or by us to a non-U.S. insurance company, even though the FET also applies at a 1% rate on premium ceded to us with respect to such risks.
Change in United States tax laws may be retroactive and could subject us and/or United States persons who own our shares to United States income taxation on our undistributed earnings.
The tax laws and interpretations thereof regarding whether a company is engaged in a United States trade or business, is a CFC, has related party insurance income or is a PFIC are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. There are currently no regulations regarding the application of the passive foreign investment company rules to an insurance company and the regulations regarding related party insurance income are in proposed form. New regulations or pronouncements interpreting or clarifying such rules may be forthcoming from the IRS. We are not able to predict if, when or in what form such guidance will be provided and whether such guidance will have a retroactive effect.
We may become subject to taxes in Bermuda after March 31, 2035, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and your investment.
The Bermuda Minister of Finance, under the Exempted Undertakings Tax Protection Act 1966 of Bermuda, as amended, has given us an assurance that if any legislation is enacted in Bermuda that would impose tax computed on profits or income, or computed on any capital asset, gain or appreciation, or any tax in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax, then the imposition of any such tax will not be applicable to us or any of our operations, shares, debentures or other obligations until March 31, 2035, except insofar as such tax applies to persons ordinarily resident in Bermuda or to any taxes payable by us in respect of real property owned or leased by us in Bermuda. See “Certain Tax Considerations-Bermuda Tax Considerations.” Given the limited duration of the Bermuda Minister of Finance’s assurance, we cannot assure you that we will not be subject to any Bermuda tax after March 31, 2035.
Risks Relating to Our Common Shares
Future sales of shares by existing shareholders could cause our share price to decline.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common shares in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our common shares to decline. As of February 27, 2014 , we have 103,921,772 issued and outstanding common shares. A total of 22,252,206 common shares are reserved for issuance under our current share incentive plans and in connection with restricted share award agreements entered into between us and certain of our employees and directors. As of December 31, 2013, there were share options outstanding which are exercisable (subject to vesting) for 10,981,075 common shares. In addition, as of December 31, 2013, we have reserved for issuance common shares underlying certain warrants to purchase, in the aggregate, up to 4,651,163 common shares.
Approximately 103,921,772 million of our common shares are eligible for sale, subject to the applicable volume, manner of sale, holding period and other limitations of Rule 144. Such number does not give effect to options or warrants to purchase common shares. In addition, certain of our significant shareholders may distribute shares that they hold to their investors who themselves may then sell into the public market. Such sales may not be subject to the volume, manner of sale, holding period and other limitations of Rule 144A. As resale restrictions end, the market price of our common shares could decline if the holders of those shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them. Existing holders of our common shares have registration rights, subject to some conditions, to require us to file registration statements covering the sale of their shares or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other shareholders in the future. In the event that we register the common shares for the holders of registration rights, they can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to the restrictions contained in the lock-up agreements entered into in connection with our IPO.
In the future, we may issue additional common shares or other equity or debt securities convertible into common shares in connection with a financing, acquisition, litigation settlement or employee arrangement or otherwise. Any of

54



these issuances could result in substantial dilution to our existing shareholders and could cause the trading price of our common shares to decline.
If securities analysts or industry analysts downgrade our ordinary shares, publish negative research or reports or fail to publish reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common shares is influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us, our business and our market. If one or more analysts adversely changes their recommendation regarding our stock or our competitors’ stock, our share price would likely decline. If one or more analysts cease coverage of us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets which in turn could cause our share price or trading volume to decline.
If the ownership of our common shares continues to be highly concentrated, it could prevent you and other shareholders from influencing significant corporate decisions.
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. was incorporated on October 6, 2011. On December 22, 2011, KIA TP Holdings, L.P. and KEP TP Holdings, L.P., which are affiliates of Kelso & Company (collectively, “Kelso”) and Pine Brook LVR, L.P., an affiliate of Pine Brook Road Partners, LLC (collectively, “Pine Brook”, and Pine Brook and together with Kelso, the “Lead Investors” and each individually, a “Lead Investor”), Dowling Capital Partners I, L.P., an affiliate of Dowling Capital Management, LLC (collectively, “Dowling”), P RE Opportunities Ltd. (“PROL”), Third Point LLC, Daniel S. Loeb and affiliates associated with Mr. Loeb (collectively, the “Loeb Entities”) and our chief executive officer John R. Berger (collectively, the “Founders”), together with certain members of management, committed $533.0 million to capitalize Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. As of December 31, 2013, Kelso, Pine Brook, the Loeb Entities, Dowling, PROL and Mr. Berger own approximately 25.2%, 12.6%, 5.8%, 1.5%, 5.0%, and 0.5% , of our issued and outstanding common shares, respectively on an as converted basis after giving effect to the issuance of warrants representing the right to receive 4,651,163 common shares. As a result, the Founders could exercise significant influence over all matters requiring shareholder approval for the foreseeable future, including approval of significant corporate transactions, which may reduce the market price of our common shares.
The interests of our existing shareholders may conflict with the interests of our other shareholders. In connection with our IPO our board of directors adopted corporate governance guidelines that, among other things, addressed potential conflicts between a director’s interests and our interests. In addition, we adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that, among other things, required our employees to avoid actions or relationships that might conflict or appear to conflict with their job responsibilities or our interests and to disclose their outside activities, financial interests or relationships that may present a possible conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict to our general counsel. These corporate governance guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will not, by themselves, prohibit transactions with our Founders.
We are an “emerging growth company,” and any decision on our part to comply with certain reduced disclosure and other requirements applicable to emerging growth companies could make our common shares less attractive to investors.
We are an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act enacted in April 2012, and, for as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may choose to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting and other requirements applicable to other public companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.
We expect to remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (a) the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of our initial public offering (b) the last day of our fiscal year in which we have annual gross revenue of $1.0 billion or more; (c) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued

55



more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt; and (d) the date on which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer,” which will occur at such time as we (1) have an aggregate worldwide market value of common equity securities held by non-affiliates of $700 million or more as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, (2) have been required to file annual, quarterly and current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for a period of at least 12 calendar months, and (3) have filed at least one annual report pursuant to the Securities Act of 1934. As a result, we may qualify as an emerging growth company until as late as December 31, 2018.
We cannot predict whether investors will find our common shares less attractive if we choose to rely on one or more of these exemptions or if our decision to avail ourselves of the reduced requirements may make it more difficult for investors and securities analysts to evaluate our company. If some investors find our common shares less attractive as a result of our decision to utilize one or more of the exemptions available to us as an emerging growth company, there may be a less active trading market for our common shares and the market price of our common shares may be adversely affected.
Under Section 102(b) of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. Pursuant to Section 107(b) of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, we have irrevocably elected to “opt out” of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.
Fulfilling our obligations incident to being a public company, including with respect to the requirements of and related rules under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is expensive and time-consuming, and any delays or difficulties in satisfying these obligations could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations and our share price.
We are required to file annual, quarterly and other reports with the SEC. We need to prepare and timely file financial statements that comply with SEC reporting requirements. We are also subject to other reporting and corporate governance requirements, under the listing standards of the NYSE and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which impose significant compliance costs and obligations upon us. Being a public company requires a significant commitment of resources and management oversight which increases our operating costs, including as a result of our engagement of a third party to assist us in developing our internal audit function. Such requirements also place significant additional demands on our finance and accounting staff and on our financial accounting and information systems. Other expenses associated with being a public company include auditing, accounting and legal fees and expenses, investor relations expenses, increased directors’ fees and director and officer liability insurance costs, registrar and transfer agent fees and listing fees, as well as other expenses. As a public company, we are required, among other things, to:
prepare and file periodic reports, and distribute other shareholder communications, in compliance with the federal securities laws and NYSE rules;
maintain comprehensive compliance, investor relations and internal audit functions; and
evaluate and maintain our system of internal control over financial reporting, and report on management’s assessment thereof, in compliance with rules and regulations of the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
In particular, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to document and test the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in accordance with an established internal control framework, and to report on our conclusions as to the effectiveness of our internal controls. Likewise, our independent registered public accounting firm is required to provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 unless we choose to utilize the exemption from such attestation requirement available to “emerging growth companies.” As described above, we expect to qualify as an emerging growth company until December 31, 2018. In addition, we are required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), to maintain disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. If we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting, investors could lose confidence in the

56



reliability of our financial statements. This could result in a decrease in the value of our common shares. Failure to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC, the NYSE, or other regulatory authorities.
We do not intend to pay dividends on our common shares and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common shares.
We do not intend to declare and pay dividends on our share capital for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to invest our future earnings, if any, to fund our growth. Therefore, you are not likely to receive any dividends on your common shares for the foreseeable future and the success of an investment in our common shares will depend upon any future appreciation in their value. There is no guarantee that our common shares will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which our shareholders have purchased their shares.
We may repurchase our common shares without our shareholders' consent.
Under our bye-laws and subject to Bermuda law, we have the option, but not the obligation, to require a shareholder to sell to us at fair market value the minimum number of common shares which is necessary to avoid or cure any adverse tax consequences or materially adverse legal or regulatory treatment to us, our subsidiaries or our shareholders if our board of directors reasonably determines, in good faith, that failure to exercise our option would result in such adverse consequences or treatment.
Holders of our shares may have difficulty effecting service of process on us or enforcing judgments against us in the United States.
We are incorporated pursuant to the laws of Bermuda and our business is based in Bermuda. In addition, certain of our directors and officers reside outside the United States, and all or a substantial portion of our assets are located in jurisdictions outside the United States. As such, we have been advised that there is doubt as to whether:
a holder of our shares would be able to enforce, in the courts of Bermuda, judgments of United States courts against persons who reside in Bermuda based upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws;

a holder of our shares would be able to enforce, in the courts of Bermuda, judgments of United States courts based upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws;

a holder of our shares would be able to bring an original action in the Bermuda courts to enforce liabilities against us or our directors and officers who reside outside the United States based solely upon United States federal securities laws.
Further, we have been advised that there is no treaty in effect between the United States and Bermuda providing for the enforcement of judgments of United States courts, and there are grounds upon which Bermuda courts may not enforce judgments of United States courts. Because judgments of United States courts are not automatically enforceable in Bermuda, it may be difficult for you to recover against us based upon such judgments.
U.S. persons who own our shares may have more difficulty in protecting their interests than U.S. persons who are shareholders of a U.S. corporation.
The Companies Act, which applies to us, differs in certain material respects from laws generally applicable to U.S. corporations and their shareholders. Set forth below is a summary of certain significant provisions of the Companies Act and our bye-laws which differ in certain respects from provisions of Delaware corporate law. Because the following statements are summaries, they do not discuss all aspects of Bermuda law that may be relevant to us and our shareholders.

57



Interested Directors : Bermuda law provides that we cannot void any transaction we enter into in which a director has an interest, nor can such director be liable to us for any profit realized pursuant to such transaction, provided the nature of the interest is disclosed at the first opportunity at a meeting of directors, or in writing, to the directors. Under Delaware law such transaction would not be voidable if:
the material facts as to such interested director’s relationship or interests were disclosed or were known to the board of directors and the board of directors had in good faith authorized the transaction by the affirmative vote of a majority of the disinterested directors;

such material facts were disclosed or were known to the shareholders entitled to vote on such transaction and the transaction were specifically approved in good faith by vote of the majority of shares entitled to vote thereon; or

the transaction were fair as to the corporation as of the time it was authorized, approved or ratified. Under Delaware law, the interested director could be held liable for a transaction in which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
Business Combinations with Large Shareholders or Affiliates : As a Bermuda company, we may enter into business combinations with our large shareholders or affiliates, including mergers, asset sales and other transactions in which a large shareholder or affiliate receives, or could receive, a financial benefit that is greater than that received, or to be received, by other shareholders, without obtaining prior approval from our board of directors or from our shareholders. If we were a Delaware corporation, we would need prior approval from our board of directors or a super-majority of our shareholders to enter into a business combination with an interested shareholder for a period of three years from the time the person became an interested shareholder, unless we opted out of the relevant Delaware statute. Our bye-laws include a provision restricting business combinations with interested shareholders consistent with the corresponding Delaware statute. See “Description of Share Capital-Certain Bye-laws Provisions-Business Combinations.”
Shareholders’ Suits : The rights of shareholders under Bermuda law are not as extensive as the rights of shareholders in many United States jurisdictions. Class actions and derivative actions are generally not available to shareholders under the laws of Bermuda. However, the Bermuda courts ordinarily would be expected to follow English case law precedent, which would permit a shareholder to commence an action in the name of the company to remedy a wrong done to the company where an act is alleged to be beyond the corporate power of the company, is illegal or would result in the violation of our memorandum of association or bye-laws. Furthermore, a court would consider acts that are alleged to constitute a fraud against the minority shareholders or where an act requires the approval of a greater percentage of our shareholders than actually approved it. The winning party in such an action generally would be able to recover a portion of attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with such action. Our bye-laws provide that shareholders waive all claims or rights of action that they might have, individually or in the right of the company, against any director or officer for any act or failure to act in the performance of such director’s or officer’s duties, except with respect to any fraud or dishonesty of such director or officer. Class actions and derivative actions generally are available to shareholders under Delaware law for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, corporate waste and actions not taken in accordance with applicable law. In such actions, the court has discretion to permit the winning party to recover attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with such action.
Indemnification of Directors : We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors. The indemnification agreements provide that we will indemnify our directors or officers or any person appointed to any committee by the board of directors acting in their capacity as such in relation to any of our affairs for any loss arising or liability attaching to them by virtue of any rule of law in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of which such person may be guilty in relation to the company other than in respect of his own fraud or dishonesty. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions, and Director Independence.” Under Delaware law, a corporation may indemnify a director or officer of the corporation against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in defense of an action, suit or proceeding by reason of such position if such director or officer acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably

58



believed to be in or not be opposed to the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, such director or officer had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.
Provisions in our bye-laws may reduce or increase the voting rights of our shares.
In general, and except as provided under our bye-laws and as described below, the common shareholders have one vote for each common share held by them and are entitled to vote, on a non-cumulative basis, at all meetings of shareholders. However, if, and so long as, the shares of a shareholder are treated as “controlled shares” (as determined pursuant to sections 957 and 958 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”)) of any United States person (that owns shares directly or indirectly through non-U.S. entities) and such controlled shares constitute 9.5% or more of the votes conferred by our issued shares, the voting rights with respect to the controlled shares owned by such U.S. Person will be limited, in the aggregate, to a voting power of less than 9.5%, under a formula specified in our bye-laws. The formula is applied repeatedly until the voting power of all 9.5% U.S. Shareholders has been reduced to less than 9.5%. In addition, our board of directors may limit a shareholder’s voting rights when it deems it appropriate to do so to (i) avoid the existence of any 9.5% U.S. Shareholder; and (ii) avoid certain material adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequences to us, any of our subsidiaries or any direct or indirect shareholder or its affiliates. “Controlled shares” include, among other things, all shares that a U.S. Person is deemed to own directly, indirectly or constructively (within the meaning of section 958 of the Code). The amount of any reduction of votes that occurs by operation of the above limitations will generally be reallocated proportionately among our other shareholders whose shares were not “controlled shares” of the 9.5% U.S. Shareholder so long as such reallocation does not cause any person to become a 9.5% U.S. Shareholder.
Under these provisions, certain shareholders may have their voting rights limited, while other shareholders may have voting rights in excess of one vote per share. Moreover, these provisions could have the effect of reducing the votes of certain shareholders who would not otherwise be subject to the 9.5% limitation by virtue of their direct share ownership.
We are authorized under our bye-laws to request information from any shareholder for the purpose of determining whether a shareholder’s voting rights are to be reallocated under the bye-laws. If any holder fails to respond to this request or submits incomplete or inaccurate information, we may, in our sole discretion, eliminate the shareholder’s voting rights. Any shareholder must give notice to the Company within ten days following the date it owns 9.5% of our common shares.
Our bye-laws contain provisions that could discourage takeovers and business combinations that our shareholders might consider in their best interests.
Our bye-laws include certain provisions that could have the effect of delaying, deterring, preventing or rendering more difficult a change in control of us that our shareholders might consider in their best interests.
For example, our bye-laws:
provide the right of shareholders to act by majority written consent for so long as the Lead Investors and the Loeb Entities collectively hold at least 35% of our issued and outstanding common shares;

establish a classified board of directors;

require advance notice of shareholders’ proposals in connection with annual general meetings;

authorize our board to issue “blank cheque” preferred shares;

prohibit us from engaging in a business combination with a person who acquires at least 15% of our common shares for a period of three years from the date such person acquired such common shares unless board and shareholder approval is obtained prior to the acquisition;

59



require that directors only be removed from office for cause by majority shareholder vote once the Lead Investors and the Loeb Entities cease to collectively hold at least 35% of our issued and outstanding shares;

provide that vacancies on the board, including newly-created directorships, may be filled only by a majority vote of directors then in office;

allow each of Kelso and Pine Brook to appoint one director for so long as they hold not less than 25% of the number of shares respectively held as of December 22, 2011;

require a supermajority vote of shareholders to effect certain amendments to our memorandum of association and bye-laws; and

provide a consent right on the part of Kelso, Pine Brook and Daniel S. Loeb to any amendments to our bye-laws or memorandum of association which would have a material adverse effect on their rights for so long as they hold not less than 25% of the number of shares respectively held as of December 22, 2011.
Any such provision could prevent our shareholders from receiving the benefit from any premium to the market price of our common shares offered by a bidder in a takeover context. Even in the absence of a takeover attempt, the existence of any of these provisions could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common shares if they were viewed as discouraging takeover attempts in the future.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties
We do not own any facilities or real estate. We lease office space at Chesney House in Pembroke, Bermuda, pursuant to a two-year lease agreement. This two-year lease is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2015. We believe for the foreseeable future this office space will be sufficient for us to conduct our operations.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are not currently involved in any litigation or arbitration. We anticipate that, similar to the rest of the reinsurance industry, we will be subject to litigation and arbitration from time to time in the ordinary course of business.
If we are subject to disputes in the ordinary course of our business we anticipate engaging in discussions with the parties to the applicable contract to seek to resolve the matter. If such discussions are unsuccessful, we anticipate invoking the dispute resolution provisions of the relevant contract, which typically provide for the parties to submit to arbitration or litigation, as applicable, to resolve the dispute.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Set forth below is information, as of February 27, 2014 , concerning the Company’s executive officers.

60



Name
Age
Position
John R. Berger
61
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Underwriting Officer
J. Robert Bredahl
51
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
Christopher S. Coleman
40
Chief Accounting Officer
Manoj K. Gupta
38
SVP, Underwriting; and Lead Portfolio Manager, Third Point Reinsurance Investment Management Ltd.
Daniel V. Malloy
54
Executive Vice President-Underwriting
Tonya L. Marshall
42
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Michael McKnight
53
Chief Actuary and Chief Risk Officer
Anthony Urban
53
Executive Vice President-Underwriting
John R. Berger - Mr. Berger is our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Underwriting Officer and has served in this position since December 22, 2011. Mr. Berger is an insurance industry veteran with over thirty years of experience, the majority of which was spent as the principal executive officer of three successful reinsurance companies. Mr. Berger served as Chief Executive Officer, Reinsurance and Vice Chairman of the Board of Alterra Capital Holdings Limited (previously known as Max Capital Group Ltd.) from May 2010. He also served as Chairman of Alterra Reinsurance Limited (previously known as Harbor Point Re Limited), Chief Executive Officer of Alterra Capital Services Inc. (previously known as Harbor Point Services, Inc.), and as a Director of Alterra Agency Limited (Harbor Point Agency Limited), New Point III Limited and New Point Re III Limited. From August 1998 to December 2005, he was the Chief Executive Officer and President of Chubb Re, Inc. From November 1983 to August 1998, he held various positions at F&G Re, including Chief Executive Officer and President. Following the acquisition of USF&G by The St. Paul Companies, from April 1998 until August 1998 he served as President of the North American Treaty operation of St. Paul Re and President of F&G Re. Prior to 1983, Mr. Berger was an Underwriter at General Re and Prudential Reinsurance. Mr. Berger is a Member of the Board of Directors of the Reinsurance Association of America. He earned an undergraduate degree in Economics from Princeton University and an MBA from Rutgers University.
J. Robert Bredahl - Mr. Bredahl is our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer and has served in these positions since February 2012. Prior to joining the Company in February 2012, Mr. Bredahl was the Chief Executive Officer of Aon Benfield Securities, Aon’s Investment Banking Group, and the President of the Americas division of Aon Benfield, the premier reinsurance intermediary and capital advisor, from November 2008 to January 2012. Prior to Aon’s acquisition of Benfield in November 2008, Mr. Bredahl held various senior level positions at Benfield and at the time of acquisition was Chief Executive Officer of Benfield U.S. Inc. and of Benfield Advisory. Prior to joining Aon Benfield in March 2002, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Inreon PLC and Managing Director and Head of U.S. Derivative Sales for Barclays Capital. Mr. Bredahl earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Middlebury College. While at Aon Benfield Securities he held several securities licenses, including the Series 24, Series 7, and Series 63.
Christopher S. Coleman - Mr. Coleman is our Chief Accounting Officer and has served in this position since April 2013. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Coleman was the Chief Financial Officer of Alterra Bermuda Limited, the principal operating subsidiary of Alterra Capital Holdings Limited (“Alterra”). Prior to Max Capital Group Ltd.’s acquisition of Harbor Point Limited to form Alterra in May 2010, Mr. Coleman was the Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer of Harbor Point Limited. Mr. Coleman joined Harbor Point Limited in March 2006. From 2002 to 2006, Mr. Coleman worked for PricewaterhouseCoopers in Bermuda as a Senior Manager within the audit and advisory practice specializing in clients in the insurance and reinsurance industry. Mr. Coleman started his career with Arthur Andersen in 1995 working in the Hartford office before relocating to the Bermuda office in 2001. Mr. Coleman graduated from Central Connecticut State University in 1995 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting. Mr. Coleman is a Certified Public Accountant and a Chartered Accountant and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Institute of Chartered Accounts of Bermuda.
Manoj K. Gupta - Mr. Gupta has held the position of SVP, Underwriting with the Company since April 16, 2012 and the position of Lead Portfolio Manager of Third Point Reinsurance Investment Management Ltd. since June 15, 2012. Prior to joining the Company Mr. Gupta was the lead portfolio manager for catastrophe reinsurance at Goldman

61



Sachs Asset Management (“GSAM”), one of the world’s largest asset management firms and a subsidiary of Goldman Sachs Group. During his tenure at GSAM from October 2006 until April 2012, Mr. Gupta launched three standalone catastrophe risk funds and also placed reinsurance risk within the firm’s multi-strategy hedge funds. Prior to joining GSAM, Mr. Gupta was a leader of reinsurance broker Benfield’s alternative capacity and credit risk solutions efforts. Prior to joining Benfield in April 2003, Mr. Gupta was head of business development and strategic planning at Inreon, a reinsurance trading platform co-sponsored by Swiss Re and Munich Re, and a management consultant for McKinsey & Company. Mr. Gupta graduated from University of Waterloo, Canada with a Bachelor of Applied Science in Electrical Engineering.
Daniel V. Malloy - Mr. Malloy is our Executive Vice President-Underwriting, a position he has served in since January 23, 2012. Prior to joining the Company. Mr. Malloy worked at Aon Benfield from 2003 co-leading the Specialty Lines practice groups, which were responsible for providing clients and brokers with primary and reinsurance market updates, peer analytics, new product ideas, growth initiatives and placement assistance. Specialty Lines includes the casualty, professional liability, surety, workers’ compensation, property risk, environmental, structured reinsurance and MGA practices. Mr. Malloy has almost 32 years of reinsurance experience including 10 years of structured reinsurance underwriting. Before joining Aon Benfield, he was President and a board member of Stockton Reinsurance Ltd. in Bermuda from 1998 to 2003. His experience with structured reinsurance began when he served as President of Centre Re Bermuda where he was employed from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Malloy began his reinsurance career in 1981 working as a reinsurance broker for Sedgwick Re for twelve years. Mr. Malloy holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in biology from Dartmouth College.
Tonya L. Marshall - Ms. Marshall is our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, a position she has served in since February 2012. She is responsible for the group legal function and acts as corporate secretary for us. Prior to joining us, Ms. Marshall was the General Counsel and Board Secretary for The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited, an international banking, asset and wealth management group headquartered in Bermuda, where she was responsible for the group’s legal function and acted as corporate secretary to the group’s holding company from November 2008 to January 2012. Prior to joining Butterfield in 2008, Ms. Marshall was employed by the international law firm of Conyers Dill & Pearman Limited (“Conyers”) from September 1998 to August 2008, where her practice included all aspects of corporate and commercial law with a particular focus on public company and insurance/reinsurance company matters. In the course of her employment with Conyers, Ms. Marshall also served as a director or alternative director to various Bermuda companies for which Conyers provided legal advice, corporate secretarial and registered office services. Ms. Marshall holds a B.Comm from Dalhousie University, an LL.B. from the University of Buckingham and a Diploma in Legal Practice from the Oxford Institute of Legal Practice.
Michael McKnight - Mr. McKnight is our Chief Actuary and Chief Risk Officer and has served in this position since February 2012. He was the Chief Actuary of Reinsurance for Alterra Capital Holdings Limited (previously known as “Max Capital Group Ltd.”) from August 2004 until September 2010. In that position, he reviewed and approved new and renewal reinsurance transactions, analyzed all bound reinsurance contracts and projected ultimate loss and reserve values, and maintained and updated the company’s Return on Equity (ROE) models. Prior to Alterra, Mr. McKnight was Managing Director & Chief Underwriting Officer of Gerling Global International Reinsurance Co. Ltd. (Barbados). In addition to his underwriting duties, he completed loss and expense actuarial reserve studies on all bound business, and set reserves at required levels. From July 1994 until August 2001, Mr. McKnight was a Consulting Actuary and Profit Center Manager for the actuarial firm of Milliman, USA. He worked on a wide variety of actuarial projects, including pricing, reserving, mergers and acquisitions and Dynamic Financial Analysis. He worked in the Atlanta and London offices, before taking over the Bermuda practice in February 1998. Mr. McKnight began his actuarial career in 1985 at Atlanta International Insurance Company (an Alexander & Alexander company-now Aon). He also worked at two personal lines companies (Integon & Direct Response Group) where he was responsible for pricing and reserving for a variety of books, including auto, homeowners and warranty. Mr. McKnight has a Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics from Valdosta State University. He is an Associate of the Casualty Actuarial Society and a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries. He is the former president of the Casualty Actuaries of Bermuda.
Anthony Urban - Mr. Urban is our Executive Vice President-Underwriting, in which position he has served since October 2011. He is the former President and Chief Executive Officer of JRG Reinsurance Company, Ltd. (“JRG Re”) a Bermuda based reinsurance company, which he helped establish in January 2008 with an initial capitalization

62



of $250 million. Prior to JRG Re, from December 2002 to July 2007, Mr. Urban was the Chief Underwriting Officer and Head of Reinsurance Operations of Endurance Reinsurance Corporation of America. Prior to Endurance, from November 2000 to November 2002, Mr. Urban served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer of AXA Corporate Solutions Reinsurance Company (“AXA”), where he managed a reinsurance portfolio of approximately $500 million in premium and a program book of business of approximately $300 million in premium. Prior to AXA, from June 1986 to October 2000, Mr. Urban was employed as a Senior Vice President and Chief Production Officer at Constitution Reinsurance Corporation. Mr. Urban started his career as a Pricing Analyst at North American Reinsurance (Swiss Re) in September 1983. Mr.  Urban has a Bachelor of Arts degree from Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.



63




PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information
Our common shares began trading on the NYSE on August 15, 2013. On February 25, 2014, the latest practicable date, the last reported sale price of our common shares was $15.05 per share and there were 171 holders of our common shares. This number does not include shareholders for whom our shares were held in “street” name.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales price per share of our common shares as reported by the NYSE:
Fiscal 2013
High
Low
3 rd  Quarter (starting on August 15, 2013)
$14.58
$12.88
4 th  Quarter
18.71
14.44
Dividends
We do not currently expect to declare or pay dividends on our common shares for the foreseeable future. Instead, we intend to retain earnings to finance the growth and development of our business and for working capital and general corporate purposes. Any payment of dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon various factors then existing, including earnings, financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, level of indebtedness, contractual restrictions with respect to payment of dividends, restrictions imposed by applicable law, general business conditions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources.” In addition, under the Companies Act, we may not declare or pay a dividend if there are reasonable grounds for believing that we are, or would after the payment be, unable to pay our liabilities as they become due or that the realized value of our assets would thereafter be less than our liabilities.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
From January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, we granted an employee options to purchase an aggregate of 348,836 common shares under the Third Point Reinsurance Limited Share Incentive Plan, at exercise prices ranging from $10.89 to $20.89 per share.
From January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, we granted an employee 5,000 restricted shares pursuant to a Restricted Share Award Agreement, with a fair value of $11.76.
The issuance of the shares and share options were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), under the Section 4(2) of the Securities Act or Rule 701 or Regulation S as promulgated under the Securities Act.
The above-referenced shares issuable upon exercise of the options were registered pursuant to our registration statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-190724, on August 20, 2013.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.


64



Equity Compensation Plans     
The following table presents information concerning the securities authorized for issuance pursuant to our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2013:
 
Number of Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options Warrants and Rights (1)
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (2)
 
Number of Securities Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding Securities Reflected in Column 1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity Compensation plans approved by shareholders
10,981,075

 
$13.23
 
10,613,975

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

 
N/A
 

Total
10,981,075

 
$13.23
 
10,613,975

 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) Represents the number of shares associated with options outstanding as of December 31, 2013.
(2) Represents the weighted average exercise price of options disclosed
(3) Represents the number of shares remaining available for issuance with respect to future awards under our Omnibus
      Equity Incentive Plan.
Performance
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common shares from the date of the Company's initial public offering on August 15th, 2013 through to December 31, 2013 to the cumulative total return of (1) S&P 500 Composite Stock Index ("S&P 500 Index") and (2) the Dow Jones Property & Casualty Insurance Index. The share price performance presented below is not necessarily indicative of future results.

65



 
Base Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company Name/Index
15-Aug-13
30-Aug-13
16-Sep-13
30-Sep-13
15-Oct-13
30-Oct-13
15-Nov-13
30-Nov-13
16-Dec-13
31-Dec-13
  t Third Point Reinsurance Ltd - TPRE
$
100.00

$
105.52

$
109.92

$
115.92

$
122.80

$
127.20

$
120.24

$
133.28

$
132.16

$
148.24

 ■ S&P 500 Index
$
100.00

$
98.61

$
101.61

$
101.83

$
102.94

$
106.66

$
107.78

$
108.70

$
107.54

$
111.26

p Dow Jones U.S. P & C Insurance Index
$
100.00

$
98.12

$
100.78

$
103.19

$
104.25

$
106.62

$
108.40

$
110.02

$
106.55

$
110.31

1.
The above graph assumes that the value of the investment was $100 on August 15, 2013.
2.
This graph is not "soliciting material," is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

Item 6 Selected Financial Data.
The selected consolidated statements of operations data for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and the period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011, and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

66



 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
 
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Selected Statement of Income (Loss) Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross premiums written
 
$
401,937

 
$
190,374

 
$

Gross premiums ceded
 
(9,975
)
 

 

Net premiums written
 
391,962

 
190,374

 

Change in net unearned premium reserves
 
(171,295
)
 
(93,893
)
 

Net premiums earned
 
220,667

 
96,481

 

Net investment income
 
253,203

 
136,422

 

Total revenues
 
473,870

 
232,903

 

Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net
 
139,812

 
80,306

 

Acquisition costs, net
 
67,944

 
24,604

 

General and administrative expenses
 
33,036

 
27,376

 
1,130

Total expenses
 
240,792

 
132,286

 
1,130

Income (loss) including non-controlling interests
 
233,078

 
100,617

 
(1,130
)
Income attributable to non-controlling interests
 
(5,767
)
 
(1,216
)
 

Net income (loss)
 
$
227,311

 
$
99,401

 
$
(1,130
)
Earnings (loss) per share (1):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
$
2.58

 
$
1.26

 
$
(0.01
)
Diluted (8)
 
$
2.54

 
$
1.26

 
$
(0.01
)
Weighted average number of common shares:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
87,505,540

 
78,432,132

 
78,432,132

Diluted (8)
 
88,970,531

 
78,598,236

 
78,432,132

Property and Casualty Reinsurance Segment - Selected Ratios (2):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss ratio (3)
 
65.7
%
 
83.2
%
 
n/a
Acquisition cost ratio (4)
 
31.5
%
 
25.5
%
 
n/a
General and administrative expense ratio (5)
 
10.3
%
 
21.0
%
 
n/a
Combined ratio (6)
 
107.5
%
 
129.7
%
 
n/a
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment return on investments managed by TP LLC (7)
 
23.9
%
 
17.7%

 
n/a
 
(1) Basic earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares and participating securities outstanding during the
      period. The weighted average number of common shares excludes any dilutive effect of outstanding warrants, options and convertible
      securities such as unvested restricted shares. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are based on the weighted average number of common shares
      and share equivalents including any dilutive effects of warrants, options and other awards under stock plans using the treasury stock method.
      U.S. GAAP requires that unvested share awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, whether paid or
      unpaid (referred to as ‘‘participating securities”), be included in the number of shares outstanding for both basic and diluted earnings per
      share calculations. We treat our unvested restricted stock as participating securities. In the event of a net loss, the participating securities are
      excluded from the calculation of both basic and diluted loss per share.
(2) Underwriting ratios are for the property and casualty reinsurance segment only. See additional information in Note 22 of the Notes to
      Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3) Loss ratio is calculated by dividing loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net, by net premiums earned.
(4) Acquisition cost ratio is calculated by dividing acquisition costs, net by net premiums earned.
(5) General and administrative expense ratio is calculated by dividing general and administrative expenses related to underwriting activities by
      net premiums earned.
(6) Combined ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net, acquisition costs, net and general and
      administrative expenses related to underwriting activities by net premiums earned.
(7) Net investment return represents the return on our investments managed by Third Point LLC, net of fees.
(8) During the quarter, it was determined that diluted earnings per share for the prior periods had been calculated incorrectly, which resulted in
      an understatement of diluted earnings per share. See additional information in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

67



 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
 
(In thousands, except per share data)
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total investments in securities and commodities
 
$
1,460,864

 
$
937,690

 
$

Cash and cash equivalents (1)
 
31,625

 
34,005

 
603,841

Restricted cash and cash equivalents
 
193,577

 
77,627

 

Securities purchased under and agreement to sell
 
38,147

 
60,408

 

Reinsurance balances receivable, net
 
191,763

 
84,280

 

Deferred acquisition costs, net
 
91,193

 
45,383

 

Loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable
 
9,277

 

 

Total assets
 
2,159,890

 
1,402,017

 
605,263

Reinsurance balances payable
 
9,081

 

 

Deposit liabilities (2)
 
120,946

 
50,446

 

Unearned premium reserves
 
265,187

 
93,893

 

Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
 
134,331

 
67,271

 

Total liabilities
 
649,494

 
473,696

 
19,838

Shareholders' equity attributable to shareholders (3)
 
1,391,661

 
868,544

 
585,425

Non-controlling interests
 
118,735

 
59,777

 

Total shareholders' equity
 
$
1,510,396

 
$
928,321

 
$
585,425

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Book value per share data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Book value per share (4)
 
$
13.48

 
$
11.07

 
$
9.73

Diluted book value per share (5)
 
$
13.12

 
$
10.89

 
$
9.73

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selected ratios:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Growth in diluted book value per share (6)
 
20.5
%
 
11.9
%
 
n/a
Return on beginning shareholders' equity (7)
 
23.4
%
 
13.0
%
 
n/a
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) Cash and cash equivalents consists of cash held in banks and other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturity dates of
      ninety days or less.
(2) Using the deposit method of accounting, a deposit liability, rather than written premium, is initially recorded based upon the
      consideration received less any explicitly identified premiums or fees. In subsequent periods, the deposit liability is adjusted by calculating
      the effective yield on the deposit to reflect actual payments to date and future expected payments.
(3) Shareholders’ equity attributable to shareholders and total shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2011 is reflected net of subscriptions
      receivable of $177.5 million in accordance with SEC Regulation S-X.
(4) Book value per share is a non-GAAP financial measure. Book value per share is calculated by dividing shareholders’ equity attributable to
      shareholders, adjusted for subscriptions receivable, by the number of issued and outstanding shares at period end. See the reconciliation
      under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Book Value Per Share and Diluted Book
      Value Per Share.”
(5) Diluted book value per share is a non-GAAP financial measure. Diluted book value per share is calculated by dividing shareholders’ equity
      attributable to shareholders, adjusted for subscriptions receivable, and adjusted to include unvested restricted shares and the exercise of all
      in-the-money options and warrants. See the reconciliation under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
      Results of Operations—Book Value Per Share and Diluted Book Value Per Share.”
(6) Growth in diluted book value per share is calculated by taking the change in diluted book value per share divided by the beginning of period
      diluted book value per share.
(7) Return on beginning shareholders’ equity as presented is a non-GAAP financial measure. Return on beginning shareholders’ equity is
      calculated by dividing net income by the beginning of year shareholders’ equity attributable to shareholders. For purposes of determining
      December 31, 2011 shareholders’ equity attributable to shareholders, we add back the impact of subscriptions receivable to shareholders’
      equity attributable to shareholders. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we have also adjusted the beginning shareholders' equity for the
      impact of the issuance of shares in our IPO on a weighted average basis. These adjustments lower the stated returns on beginning
      shareholders' equity. See the reconciliation under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
      Operations - Return on Beginning Shareholders' Equity."


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis is intended to help the reader understand our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. You should read this discussion in conjunction with

68



Part II, Item 6. "Selected Financial Data", and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 ("Annual Report").
The statements in this discussion regarding business outlook, our expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and capital resources and other non-historical statements in this discussion are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to our Introductory Note to this Annual Report and the risks and uncertainties described in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors.” Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements.
Our fiscal year ends December 31 and, unless otherwise noted, references to years or fiscal are for fiscal years ended December 31.
Overview
We are a Bermuda-based specialty property and casualty reinsurer with a reinsurance and investment strategy that we believe differentiates us from our competitors. Our objective is to deliver attractive equity returns to shareholders by combining profitable reinsurance underwriting with our investment manager Third Point LLC’s superior investment management.
We manage our business on the basis of two operating segments: Property and Casualty Reinsurance and Catastrophe Risk Management. We also have a corporate function that includes our investment results and certain general and administrative expenses related to corporate activities.
Property and Casualty Reinsurance
We provide reinsurance products to insurance and reinsurance companies, government entities, and other risk bearing vehicles. Contracts can be written on an excess of loss basis or quota share basis, although the majority of contracts written to date have been on a quota share basis. In addition, we write contracts on both a prospective basis and a retroactive basis. Prospective reinsurance contracts cover losses incurred as a result of future insurable events. Retroactive reinsurance contracts cover the potential for changes in estimates of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves related to loss events that have occurred in the past. Retroactive reinsurance contracts can be an attractive type of contract for us as they can generate an underwriting profit should the ultimate loss and loss adjustment expenses settle for less than the initial estimate of reserves and the premiums received at the inception of the contract generate insurance float. The product lines that we currently underwrite for this operating segment are: property, casualty and specialty.
Insurance float is an important aspect of our property and casualty reinsurance operation. In an insurance or reinsurance operation, float arises because premiums from reinsurance contracts and consideration received for deposit accounting contracts are collected before losses are paid and proceeds are returned on deposit accounting contracts. In some instances, the interval between cash receipts and payments can extend over many years. During this time interval, we invest the cash received and generate investment returns. Although float can be calculated using numbers determined under U.S. GAAP, float is a non-GAAP financial measure and, therefore, there is no comparable U.S. GAAP measure.
We believe that our property and casualty reinsurance segment will contribute to our results by both generating underwriting income as well as generating float. In addition, we expect that float will grow over time as our reinsurance operations expand.
Catastrophe Risk Management
In contrast to many reinsurers with whom we compete, we have elected to limit our underwriting of property catastrophe exposures. We write excess of loss catastrophe reinsurance exclusively through the Catastrophe Fund, which is a separately capitalized reinsurance fund vehicle. On June 15, 2012, we established the Catastrophe Fund, the Catastrophe Fund Manager and the Catastrophe Reinsurer, in partnership with Hiscox. Our partnership with Hiscox is governed by a shareholders’ agreement that provides for certain matters relating to governance of the Catastrophe Fund Manager and restrictions on the transfers of its shares. Our investment in and management of the Catastrophe Fund

69



allows us to provide a product that is important to most of our reinsurance clients and to earn fee income over time. Because the Catastrophe Fund is capitalized in part by investments from unrelated parties, our financial exposure to the higher volatility and liquidity risks associated with property catastrophe losses is limited to our investment in the Catastrophe Fund, which as of December 31, 2013 was $54.8 million . We anticipate that our property catastrophe exposures will consistently remain relatively low when compared to many other reinsurers with whom we compete and there are no additional guarantees or recourse to us beyond our investment.
The Catastrophe Fund Manager is a property catastrophe fund management company, which began writing catastrophe risk through the Catastrophe Fund and related Catastrophe Reinsurer on January 1, 2013. The Catastrophe Fund Manager receives fee income in the form of management fees and performance fees from the Catastrophe Fund. We own 85% of the Catastrophe Fund Manager and Hiscox owns the remaining 15% . We consolidate the Catastrophe Fund Manager’s results in our consolidated results with a non-controlling interest recorded for the 15% Hiscox ownership. The objective of the Catastrophe Fund is to achieve positive uncorrelated investment returns by transacting, through the Catastrophe Reinsurer, in a portfolio of collateralized reinsurance treaties and other insurance-linked securities, including catastrophe bonds and industry loss warranties. The Catastrophe Reinsurer is a Bermuda based special purpose insurer authorized to write collateralized property catastrophe reinsurance business. The Catastrophe Fund owns 100% of the voting, non-participating, common shares and 100% of the non-voting, participating, preferred shares of the Catastrophe Reinsurer.
As of December 31, 2013 , the Catastrophe Fund had a net asset value of $104.0 million, of which our share was $54.8 million. As a result of our controlling interest in the Catastrophe Fund, we are required to consolidate the results of the Catastrophe Fund and the Catastrophe Reinsurer. The Catastrophe Fund is actively seeking new third party investments and we expect our interest to drop in the future which would potentially allow us to deconsolidate the Catastrophe Fund. However, market conditions have been challenging due to the recent launch of several similar funds and a drop in catastrophe reinsurance pricing. Given current market conditions, we expect to limit the size of the Catastrophe Fund to ensure we can continue to profitably deploy the funds under management until market conditions improve.     
Investment Management
Our investment strategy is implemented by our investment manager, Third Point LLC, under a long-term investment management contract. We directly own the investments which are held in a separate account and managed by Third Point LLC on substantially the same basis as Third Point LLC’s main hedge funds .
Limited Operating History and Comparability of Results
We were incorporated on October 6, 2011 and completed our initial capitalization on December 22, 2011. We began underwriting business on January 1, 2012. We completed an initial public offering of common shares on August 20, 2013 (the "IPO"). As a result, we have a limited operating history and are exposed to volatility in our results of operations. Period to period comparisons of our results of operations may not be meaningful.
In addition, the amount of premiums written may vary from year to year and from period to period as a result of several factors, including changes in market conditions and our view of the long-term profit potential of individual lines of business.
Key Performance Indicators
We believe that by combining a disciplined and opportunistic approach to reinsurance underwriting with investment results from the active management of our investment portfolio, we will be able to generate attractive returns for our shareholders. The key financial measures that we believe are most meaningful in analyzing our performance are: net underwriting income (loss) for our property and casualty reinsurance segment, combined ratio for our property and casualty reinsurance segment, net investment income, net investment return on investments managed by Third Point LLC, book value per share, diluted book value per share, growth in diluted book value per share and return on beginning shareholders’ equity.


70



Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We have included financial measures that are not calculated under standards or rules that comprise accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP).  Such measures, including net underwriting income (loss), combined ratio, book value per share, diluted book value per share and return on beginning shareholders' equity, are referred to as non-GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures may be defined or calculated differently by other companies. We believe these measures allow for a more complete understanding of the underlying business. These measures are used to monitor our results and should not be viewed as a substitute for those determined in accordance with GAAP.  Reconciliations of such measures to the most comparable GAAP figures are referenced below in accordance with Regulation G.
The table below shows the key performance indicators for our consolidated business for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the period from October 6, 2011 (incorporation date) to December 31, 2011:
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
(In thousands, except for per share data and ratios)
Key underwriting metrics for Property and Casualty Reinsurance segment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net underwriting loss (1)
 
$
(15,828
)
 
$
(28,719
)
 
n/a
Combined ratio (1)
 
107.5
%
 
129.7
%
 
n/a
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Key investment return metrics:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment income
 
$
253,203

 
$
136,422

 
n/a
Net investment return on investments managed by Third Point LLC
 
23.9
%
 
17.7
%
 
n/a
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Key shareholders' value creation metrics:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Book value per share (2)
 
$
13.48

 
$
11.07

 
$
9.73

Diluted book value per share (2)
 
$
13.12

 
$
10.89

 
$
9.73

Growth in diluted book value per share (2)
 
20.5
%
 
11.9
%
 
n/a
Return on beginning shareholders' equity (3)
 
23.4
%
 
13.0
%
 
n/a
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) Net underwriting loss and combined ratio are Non-GAAP financial measures. See Note 22 of the accompanying consolidated financial
      statements for an explanation and calculation of net underwriting loss and combined ratio.
(2) Book value per share and diluted book value per share are Non-GAAP financial measures. See reconciliation below for calculation of book
     value per share and diluted book value per share.
(3)  Return on beginning shareholders’ equity is a Non-GAAP financial measure.  See reconciliation below for calculation of return on
     beginning shareholders’ equity.
Net Underwriting Income (Loss) for Property and Casualty Reinsurance Segment
One way that we evaluate the performance of our property and casualty reinsurance results is by measuring net underwriting income or loss. We do not measure performance based on the amount of gross premiums written. Net underwriting income or loss is calculated from net premiums earned, less net loss and loss adjustment expenses, acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses related to the underwriting activities.
Combined Ratio for Property and Casualty Reinsurance Segment
The combined ratio compares the amount of net premiums earned to the amount incurred in claims and underwriting related expenses. This ratio is a key indicator of a reinsurance company’s profitability. It is calculated by dividing net premiums earned by the sum of loss and loss adjustment expenses, acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses related to underwriting activities. A combined ratio greater than 100% means that loss and loss adjustment expenses, acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses related to underwriting activities exceeded net premiums earned.

71



Net Investment Income
Net investment income is an important measure that affects overall profitability. Net investment income is affected by the performance of Third Point LLC as our exclusive investment manager and the amount of investable cash, or float, generated by our reinsurance operation. Pursuant to the investment management agreement, Third Point LLC is required to manage our investment portfolio on substantially the same basis as its main hedge funds, subject to certain conditions set forth in our investment guidelines. These conditions include limitations on investing in private securities, a limitation on portfolio leverage, and a limitation on portfolio concentration in individual securities. The investment management agreement allows us to withdraw cash from our investment account with Third Point LLC at any time with three days’ notice to pay claims and with five days’ notice to pay expenses.
We track excess cash flows generated by our property and casualty reinsurance operation, or float, in a separate account which allows us to also track the net investment income generated on the float. We believe that net investment income generated on float is an important consideration in evaluating the overall contribution of our property and casualty reinsurance operation to our consolidated results. It is also explicitly considered as part of the evaluation of management’s performance for purposes of incentive compensation.
Net investment income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was comprised of the following:
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
($ in thousands)
Net investment income on float
 
$
26,953

 
4,901

Net investment income on capital
 
226,751

 
131,967

Net investment income on investments managed by Third Point LLC
 
253,704

 
136,868

Deposit liabilities and reinsurance contracts investment expense
 
(4,922
)
 
(446
)
Investment income on cash collateral held by the Catastrophe Reinsurer
 
86

 

Net gain on reinsurance contract derivatives written by the Catastrophe Reinsurer
 
4,335

 

 
 
$
253,203

 
$
136,422

Net Investment Return on Investments Managed by Third Point LLC
The net investment return on investments managed by Third Point LLC is the percentage change in value of a dollar invested over the reporting period on our investment assets managed by Third Point LLC, net of non-controlling interest. Net investment return is the key indicator by which we measure the performance of Third Point LLC, our investment manager.
Return on Beginning Shareholders’ Equity
Return on beginning shareholders’ equity as presented is a non-GAAP financial measure. Return on beginning shareholders’ equity is calculated by dividing net income by the beginning shareholders’ equity attributable to shareholders and is a commonly used calculation to measure profitability. For purposes of this calculation, we add back the impact of subscriptions receivable to shareholders’ equity attributable to shareholders as of December 31, 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we have also adjusted the beginning shareholders' equity for the impact of the issuance of shares in our IPO on a weighted average basis. These adjustments lower the stated returns on beginning shareholders' equity.
Return on beginning shareholders' equity for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was calculated as follows:

72



 
 
2013
 
2012
 
($ in thousands)
Net income
 
$
227,311

 
$
99,401

Shareholders' equity attributable to shareholders - beginning of period
 
868,544

 
585,425

Subscriptions receivable
 

 
177,507

Impact of weighting related to shareholders' equity from IPO
 
104,502

 

Adjusted shareholders' equity attributable to shareholders - beginning of period
 
973,046

 
762,932

Return on beginning shareholders' equity
 
23.4
%
 
13.0
%
Book Value Per Share and Diluted Book Value Per Share
We believe that long-term growth in diluted book value per share is the most important measure of our financial performance. Book value per share as used by our management is a non-GAAP measure, as it is calculated after deducting the impact of non-controlling interests. Diluted book value per share is also a non-GAAP measure and represents book value per share reduced for the impact from dilution of all in-the-money share options issued, warrants and unvested restricted shares outstanding as of any period end. 
For the year ended December 31, 2013 , book value per share increased by $ 2.41 per share, or 21.8% , to $13.48 per share from $11.07 per share as of December 31, 2012 . For the year ended December 31, 2013 , diluted book value per share increased by $ 2.23 per share, or 20.5% , to $13.12 per share from $10.89 per share as of December 31, 2012 .
The increase in basic and diluted book value per share for the year was driven primarily from net income partially offset by the offering costs incurred with our IPO. The growth in diluted book value per share was also impacted by warrants and share compensation issued to our Founders, employees, directors and an advisor, including the additional warrants and options that became exercisable as a result of meeting the performance condition after the IPO.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted book value per share as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
 
2013
 
2012
Basic and diluted book value per share numerator:
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Total shareholders' equity
$
1,510,396

 
$
928,321

Less: non-controlling interests
118,735

 
59,777

Shareholders' equity attributable to shareholders
1,391,661

 
868,544

Effect of dilutive warrants issued to Founders and an advisor
46,512

 
36,480

Effect of dilutive share options issued to directors and employees
101,274

 
51,670

Diluted book value per share numerator:
$
1,539,447

 
$
956,694

Basic and diluted book value per share denominator:
 
Issued and outstanding shares
103,264,616

 
78,432,132

Effect of dilutive warrants issued to Founders and an advisor
4,651,163

 
3,648,006

Effect of dilutive share options issued to directors and employees
8,784,861

 
5,167,045

Effect of dilutive restricted shares issued to directors and employees
657,156

 
619,300

Diluted book value per share denominator:
117,357,796

 
87,866,483

 
 
 
 
Basic book value per share
$
13.48

 
$
11.07

Diluted book value per share
$
13.12

 
$
10.89



73



Revenues
We derive our revenues from two principal sources:
premiums from property and casualty reinsurance business assumed; and
income from investments.
 
Premiums from our property and casualty reinsurance business assumed are directly related to the number, type and pricing of contracts we write. Premiums are earned over the contract period in proportion to the period of risk covered which is typically 12 to 24 months.
Income from our investments is primarily comprised of interest income, dividends, and net realized and unrealized gains on investment securities included in our investment portfolio.
Expenses
Our expenses consist primarily of the following:
loss and loss adjustment expenses;
acquisition costs;
investment-related expenses; and
general and administrative expenses.
Loss and loss adjustment expenses are a function of the amount and type of reinsurance contracts we write and loss experience of the underlying coverage. Loss and loss adjustment expenses are based on an actuarial analysis of the estimated losses, including losses incurred during the period and changes in estimates from prior periods. Depending on the nature of the contract, loss and loss adjustment expenses may be paid over a number of years.
Acquisition costs consist primarily of brokerage fees, ceding commissions, premium taxes and other direct expenses that relate to our writing reinsurance contracts and are presented net of commissions ceded under reinsurance contracts. We amortize deferred acquisition costs over the related contract term in the same proportion that the premiums are earned.
Investment-related expenses primarily consist of management fees we pay to our investment manager, Third Point LLC, and certain of our Founders, pursuant to the investment management agreement and performance fees we pay to Third Point Advisors LLC. A 2% management fee calculated on assets under management is paid monthly to Third Point LLC and certain of our Founders, and a performance fee equal to 20% of the net investment income is paid annually to Third Point Advisors LLC. We include these expenses in net investment income in our consolidated statement of income.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits and related payroll costs, including costs associated with our incentive compensation plan, share compensation expenses, legal and accounting fees, travel and client entertainment, fees relating to our letter of credit facilities, information technology, occupancy and other general operating expenses.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
See Note 2 of our notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a summary of our significant accounting and reporting policies.
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions. We believe that the accounting policies that require the most significant judgments and estimations by management are (1) premium revenue recognition including evaluation of risk transfer, (2) loss and loss adjustment expense reserves, and (3) fair value measurements related to our investments. If actual events

74



differ significantly from the underlying judgments or estimates used by management in the application of these accounting policies, there could be a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Premium Revenue Recognition including evaluation of Risk Transfer
We estimate the ultimate premiums for the entire contract period and record this estimate at the inception of the contract, to the extent that the amount of written premium is estimable. For contracts where the full written premium is not estimable at inception, we record written premium for the portion of the contract period for which the amount is estimable. These estimates are based primarily on information in the underlying contracts as well as information provided by our clients and/or brokers.
Premiums written are earned over the contract period in proportion to the period of risk covered. Unearned premiums represent the portion of premiums written that relate to the unexpired term of the contracts in force.
Premiums for retroactive reinsurance contracts, where we have evaluated and concluded that risk transfer has occurred, are earned at the inception of the contract, as all of the underlying loss events covered by these contracts occurred in the past. Any underwriting profit at inception of a retroactive reinsurance contract is deferred and recognised over the estimated future payout of the loss and loss adjustment expenses reserves. Any underwriting loss at inception of a retroactive reinsurance contract is recognised immediately.
Changes in premium estimates are expected and may result in adjustments in any reporting period. These estimates change over time as additional information regarding the underlying business volume is obtained. Along with uncertainty regarding the underlying business volume, our contracts also contain a number of contractual features that can significantly impact the amount of premium that we ultimately recognize. These include commutation provisions, multi-year contracts with cancellation provisions, provisions to return premium at the expiration of the contract in certain circumstances. In certain contracts, these provisions can be exercised by the client, in some cases provisions can be exercised by us and in other cases by mutual consent. In addition, we write a small number of large contracts and the majority of our property and casualty reinsurance segment premiums written to date has been quota share business. As a result, we may be subject to greater volatility around our premium estimates compared to other property and casualty companies. We continuously monitor the premium estimate of each of our contracts considering the cash premiums received, reported premiums, discussions with our clients regarding their premium projections as well as evaluating the potential impact of contractual features. Any subsequent adjustments arising on such estimates are recorded in the period in which they are determined.
Changes in premium estimates do not necessarily result in a direct impact to net income or shareholders’ equity since changes in premium estimates do not necessarily impact the amount of net premiums earned at the time of the premium estimate change and would generally be offset by pro rata changes in acquisition costs and net loss and loss adjustment expenses.
During the year ended December 31, 2013 , we recorded $(35.7) million of changes in premium estimates on prior years' contracts, primarily due to return premiums on certain contracts that expired during the period with a provision within the contract to return the unearned premiums at expiration. However, there was minimal impact on net income of these changes in premium estimates for the year ended December 31, 2013 .
Determining whether or not a reinsurance contract meets the condition for risk transfer requires judgment. The determination of risk transfer is critical to reporting premiums written and is based, in part, on the use of actuarial and pricing models and assumptions and evaluating contractual features that could impact the determination of whether a contract meets risk transfer. If we determine that a reinsurance contract does not transfer sufficient risk, we use deposit accounting. See Note 12 of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information on deposit contracts entered into to date.
Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves
Our loss and loss adjustment expense reserves include case reserves and reserves for losses incurred but not yet reported (“IBNR reserves”). Case reserves are established for losses that have been reported, but not yet paid, based on loss reports from brokers and ceding companies. IBNR reserves represent the estimated loss and loss adjustment

75



expenses that have been incurred by insureds and reinsureds but not yet reported to the insurer or reinsurer, including unknown future developments on loss and loss adjustment expenses which are known to us. IBNR reserves are established by management based on actuarially determined estimates of ultimate loss and loss adjustment expenses.
Inherent in the estimate of ultimate loss and loss adjustment expenses are expected trends in claim severity and frequency and other factors that may vary significantly as claims are settled. Accordingly, ultimate loss and loss adjustment expenses may differ materially from the amounts recorded in the financial statements. These estimates are reviewed regularly and, as experience develops and new information becomes known, the reserves are adjusted as necessary. Such adjustments, if any, are recorded in the consolidated statement of income in the period in which they become known.
We perform an actuarial projection of our reserves quarterly and have a third-party actuarial review performed annually. All reserves are estimated on an individual contract basis; there is no aggregation of contracts for projection of ultimate loss or reserves.
We initially reserve every individual contract to the expected loss and loss expense ratio in the pricing analysis. As loss information is received from the cedents, we incorporate other actuarial methods in our projection of ultimate losses and, hence, reserves. In our pricing analysis, we typically utilize a significant amount of information unique to the individual client and, when necessary, supplement the analysis with industry data. Industry data primarily takes the form of paid and incurred development patterns from statutory financial statements and statistical agencies. For our actuarial reserve projections, the relevant information we receive from our reinsurance clients include premium estimates, paid loss and loss adjustment expenses and case reserves. We review the data for reasonableness and research any anomalies. On each contract, we compare the expected paid and incurred amounts at each quarter-end with actual amounts reported. We also compare premiums received with projected premium receipts at each quarter end.
There is a time lag between when a covered loss event occurs and when it is actually reported to our cedents. The actuarial methods that we use to estimate losses have been designed to address this lag in loss reporting. There is also a time lag between reinsurance clients paying claims, establishing case reserves and re-estimating their reserves, and notifying us of the payments and/or new or revised case reserves. This reporting lag is typically 60 to 90 days after the end of a reporting period, but can be longer in some cases. We use techniques that adjust for this type of lag. While it would be unusual to have lags that extend beyond 90 days, our actuarial techniques are designed to adjust for such a circumstance.
The principal actuarial methods (and associated key assumptions) we use to perform our quarterly loss reserve analysis may include one or more of the following methods:
A Priori Loss Ratio Method . To estimate ultimate losses under the a priori loss ratio method, we multiply earned premiums by an expected loss ratio. The expected loss ratio is selected as part of the pricing and utilizes individual client data, supplemented by industry data where necessary. This method is often useful when there is limited historical data due to few losses being incurred.
Paid Loss Development Method . This method estimates ultimate losses by calculating past paid loss development factors and applying them to exposure periods with further expected paid loss development. The paid loss development method assumes that losses are paid at a rate consistent with the historical rate of payment. It provides an objective test of reported loss projections because paid losses contain no reserve estimates. For some lines of business, claim payments are made slowly and it may take many years for claims to be fully reported and settled.
Incurred Loss Development Method . This method estimates ultimate losses by using past incurred loss development factors and applying them to exposure periods with further expected incurred loss development. Since incurred losses include payments and case reserves, changes in both of these amounts are incorporated in this method. This approach provides a larger volume of data to estimate ultimate losses than paid loss methods. Thus, incurred loss patterns may be less varied than paid loss patterns, especially for coverages that have historically been paid out over a long period of time but for which claims are incurred relatively early and case loss reserve estimates established.
Bornhuetter-Ferguson Paid and Incurred Loss Methods . These methods are a weighted average of the a priori loss ratio and the relevant development factor method. The weighting between the two methods depends on the maturity

76



of the business. This means that for the more recent years a greater weight is placed on the a priori loss ratio, while for the more mature years a greater weight is placed on the development factor methods. These methods avoid some of the distortions that could result from a large development factor being applied to a small base of paid or incurred losses to calculate ultimate losses. This method will react slowly if actual paid or incurred loss experience develops differently than historical paid or incurred loss experience because of major changes in rate levels, retentions or deductibles, the forms and conditions of coverage, the types of risks covered or a variety of other factors.
IBNR to Outstanding Ratio Method . This method is used in selected cases typically for very mature years that still have open claims. This method assumes that the estimated future loss development is indicated by the current level of case reserves.
Key to the projection of ultimate loss is the amount of credibility or weight assigned to each actuarial method. Each method has advantages and disadvantages, and those can change depending on numerous factors including the reliability of the underlying data. For most actuaries, the selection and weighting of the projection methods is a highly subjective process. In order to achieve a desirable amount of consistency from study to study and between contracts, we have implemented a weighting scheme that incorporates numerous “rules” for the weighting of actuarial methods. These rules attempt to effectively codify the judgmental process used for selecting weights for the various methods. There can be extenuating circumstances where the rules would be modified for a specific reinsurance contract; examples would include a large market event or new information on historical years that may cause us to increase our a priori loss ratio.
As part of our quarterly reserving process, loss-sensitive contingent expenses (e.g., profit commissions, sliding-scale ceding commissions, etc.) are calculated on an individual contract basis. These expense calculations are based on the updated ultimate loss estimates derived from our quarterly reserving process.
Our reserving methodologies use a loss reserving model that calculates a point estimate for our ultimate losses. Although we believe that our assumptions and methodologies are reasonable, we cannot be certain that our ultimate payments will not vary, potentially materially, from the estimates that we have made.
We do not produce a range of IBNR reserves. However, a 10% increase in IBNR reserves would translate into a 0.7% decrease in total shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2013 and a 0.7% decrease in total shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2012.
Fair value measurements
Our investments are managed by Third Point LLC and are carried at fair value. Our investment manager, Third Point LLC, has a formal valuation policy that sets forth the pricing methodology for investments to be used in determining the fair value of each security in our portfolio. The valuation policy is updated and approved at least on an annual basis by Third Point LLC’s valuation committee (the “Committee”), which is comprised of officers and employees who are senior business management personnel of Third Point LLC. The Committee meets on a monthly basis. The Committee’s role is to review and verify the propriety and consistency of the valuation methodology to determine the fair value of investments. The Committee also reviews any due diligence performed and approves any changes to current or potential external pricing vendors.
Securities and commodities listed on a national securities or commodities exchange or quoted on NASDAQ are valued at their last sales price as of the last business day of the period. Listed securities with no reported sales on such date and over-the-counter (“OTC”) securities are valued at their last closing bid price if held long by us, and last closing ask price if held short by us.
Private securities are not registered for public sale and are carried at an estimated fair value at the end of the period, as determined by Third Point LLC. Valuation techniques, using information obtained from Third Point LLC, may include market approach, last transaction analysis, liquidation analysis and/or using discounted cash flow models where the significant inputs could include but are not limited to additional rounds of equity financing, financial metrics such as revenue multiples or price-earnings ratio, discount rates and other factors. In addition, we or Third Point LLC may employ third party valuation firms to conduct separate valuations of such private securities. The third party valuation

77



firms provide us or Third Point LLC with a written report documenting their recommended valuation as of the determination date for the specified investments.
Due to the inherent uncertainty of valuation for private securities, the estimated fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for these investments. The actual value at which these securities could actually be sold or settled with a willing buyer or seller may differ from our estimated fair values depending on a number of factors including, but not limited to, current and future economic conditions, the quantity sold or settled, the presence of an active market and the availability of a willing buyer or seller.
Our derivatives are recorded at fair value. Third Point LLC values exchange-traded derivative contracts at their last sales price on the exchange where it is primarily traded. OTC derivatives, which include swap, option, swaption, forward, future and contract for differences, are valued by third party sources when available; otherwise, fair values are obtained from counterparty quotes that are based on pricing models that consider the time value of money, volatility, and the current market and contractual prices of the underlying financial instruments.
As an extension of our underwriting activities, the Catastrophe Reinsurer has sold derivative instruments that provide reinsurance-like protection to third parties for specific loss events associated with certain lines of business.  These derivatives are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with the offset recorded in net investment income in the consolidated statements of income (loss).  These contracts are valued on the basis of models developed by us, which approximates fair value.
Our holdings in asset-backed securities (“ABS”) are substantially invested in residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”). The balance of the ABS positions were held in commercial mortgage-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations and student loan asset-backed securities. These investments are valued using dealer quotes or recognised third-party pricing vendors. All of these classes of ABS are sensitive to changes in interest rates and any resulting change in the rate at which borrowers sell their properties, refinance, or otherwise pre-pay their loans. Investors in these classes of ABS may be exposed to the credit risk of underlying borrowers not being able to make timely payments on loans or the likelihood of borrowers defaulting on their loans. In addition, investors may be exposed to significant market and liquidity risks.
We value our investments in affiliated investment funds at fair value, which is an amount equal to the sum of the capital account in the limited partnership generally determined from financial information provided by the investment manager of the investment funds. The resulting net gains or net losses are reflected in the consolidated statement of income.
The fair values of investments are estimated using prices obtained from third-party pricing services, whe n available. However, situations may arise where we believe that the fair value provided by the third-party pricing service does not represent current market conditions.  In those situations, Third Point LLC may use dealer quotes to value the investments.  For securities that we are unable to obtain fair values from a pricing service or broker, fair values are estimated using information obtained from Third Point LLC.
We perform several processes to ascertain the reasonableness of the valuation of all of our investments comprising our investment portfolio, including securities that are categorized as Level 2 and Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. These processes include (i) obtaining and reviewing weekly and monthly investment portfolio reports from Third Point LLC, (ii) obtaining and reviewing monthly NAV and investment return reports received directly from our third-party fund administrator which are compared to the reports noted in (i), and (iii) monthly update discussions with Third Point LLC regarding the investment portfolio, including, their process for reviewing and validating pricing obtained from outside service providers.
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no changes in the valuation techniques as it relates to the above.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the closing rates of exchange as of December 31, 2013 . Transactions during the period are translated at the rate of exchange prevailing on the date of the transaction. We do not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments, dividends and interest from the fluctuations arising from changes in fair values of securities and

78



derivatives held. Periodic payments received or paid on swap agreements are recorded as realized gain or loss on investment transactions. Such fluctuations are included within net investment income in the consolidated statement of income.
U.S. GAAP disclosure requirements establish a framework for measuring fair value, including a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability. The three-level hierarchy of inputs is summarized below:
Level 1 – Quoted prices available in active markets/exchanges for identical investments as of the reporting date.
 
Level 2 – Observable inputs to the valuation methodology other than unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs include, but are not limited to, prices quoted for similar assets or liabilities in active markets/exchanges, prices quoted for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and fair values determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies.
Level 3 – Pricing inputs unobservable for the investment and include activities where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. The inputs applied in the determination of fair value require significant management judgment and estimation.
Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability including assumptions about risk; for example, the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique used to measure fair value including such a pricing model and/or the risk inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. Inputs may be observable or unobservable.
Observable inputs are inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources other than those of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment.
The key inputs for corporate, government and sovereign bond valuation are coupon frequency, coupon rate and underlying bond spread. The key inputs for asset-backed securities are yield, probability of default, loss severity and prepayment.
Key inputs for OTC valuations vary based on the type of underlying security on which the contract was written:
The key inputs for most OTC option contracts include notional, strike price, maturity, payout structure, current foreign exchange forward and spot rates, current market price of underlying and volatility of underlying.
The key inputs for most forward contracts include notional, maturity, forward rate, spot rate, various interest rate curves and discount factor.
The key inputs for swap valuation will vary based on the type of underlying on which the contract was written. Generally, the key inputs for most swap contracts include notional, swap period, fixed rate, credit or interest rate curves, current market or spot price of the underlying and the volatility of the underlying.

79




Business Outlook
The reinsurance markets in which we operate have historically been cyclical. During periods of excess underwriting capacity, as defined by the availability of capital, competition can result in lower pricing and less favorable policy terms and conditions for insurers and reinsurers. During periods of reduced underwriting capacity, pricing and policy terms and conditions are generally more favorable for insurers and reinsurers. Historically, underwriting capacity has been impacted by several factors, including industry losses, the impact of catastrophes, changes in legal and regulatory guidelines, new entrants, investment results including interest rate levels and the credit ratings and financial strength of competitors.
While management believes pricing remains adequate for the types of business on which we focus, there is significant underwriting capacity currently available. As a result, we believe market conditions will remain challenging in the near term. The segment with the greatest pricing pressure is property catastrophe reinsurance due to an influx of capacity from collateralized reinsurance and other ILS vehicles and the absence of significant catastrophe events during 2013. We and most other market participants believe that pricing for property catastrophe reinsurance treaties that renewed on January 1, 2014 dropped by more than 10% on average. Pricing for other types of traditional reinsurance, which are less attractive to collateralized reinsurance vehicles due to their longer loss development and claims payment periods, is also under pressure but not to the same degree as property catastrophe reinsurance.
Our direct exposure to falling property catastrophe prices is contained within the Catastrophe Fund and limited to our $ 54.8 million investment in the Catastrophe Fund and the contingent profit commission we receive from managing the Catastrophe Fund which had assets under management of $104.0 million as of December 31, 2013. The expected overall impact on our results, however, is tempered by the Catastrophe Fund’s portfolio construction and focus on smaller, regional companies, which have experienced more modest price decreases. Given current market conditions, we expect to limit the size of the Catastrophe Fund to ensure we can continue to profitably deploy the funds under management until market conditions improve.
In non-catastrophe lines of business, we focus on segments and clients where there is relatively more attractive pricing opportunities due to the strength of our relationships, uniqueness of our reinsurance solutions or an acute need for reinsurance capital as result of a client’s rapid growth or historical poor performance. Most of our senior management team have spent decades within the reinsurance market and as they cultivate their relationships with intermediaries and reinsurance buyers, we are seeing an increased flow of submissions in the lines and types of reinsurance that we target. Although we are typically presented by brokers with proposed structures on syndicated deals, we work to improve and enhance the proposed solution for the client while improving our economics and establishing our position as the lead reinsurer in the transaction. We also look for non-syndicated opportunities where a highly customized solution is needed. These often take the form of loss portfolio transfers or adverse development reserve covers where clients want capital relief and enhanced investment returns on the reserves. Many of our primary insurance company clients are growing gross premium primarily through realizing rate increases and, to a lesser extent, expansion of the number of policies they write. As a consequence, their need for quota share reinsurance has increased. Finally, the number of distressed insurance company situations, for which our customized solutions may be helpful, appears to be increasing.
Despite the fact that market conditions have deteriorated over the past year, we believe that there are several market developments that indicate a potential for improving market conditions in the medium term. These include improving pricing in several primary insurance lines of business which historically have flowed through to the reinsurance market, decelerating reserve releases from prior underwriting years, and historically low yields from investment portfolios consisting mostly of long-only, investment grade, shorter-term, fixed income securities. Companies with historically low yields from their investment portfolios are now focused on the need for pricing increases to offset the continued drop in investment income or on increasing the risk profile of their investment portfolios, which consumes more of their risk capital.

80



Consolidated Results of Operations—Years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and Period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011
For the year ended December 31, 2013 , our net income increased by $127.9 million, or 128.7%, to $227.3 million , compared to net income of $99.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and a net loss of $1.1 million for the period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011.
The increase in net income for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 was primarily due to the following:
The net underwriting loss from our property and casualty reinsurance segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $15.8 million , compared to a net underwriting loss of $28.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 . The combined ratio for the year ended December 31, 2013 was 107.5% compared to 129.7% for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Our catastrophe risk management segment contributed net income of $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to a net loss of $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The Catastrophe Reinsurer wrote no business before January 1, 2013. The year ended December 31, 2012 included certain start-up related expenses related to formation of this segment.
For the year ended December 31, 2013 , we recorded net investment income of $ 253.2 million , compared to $ 136.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 . The return on investments managed by Third Point LLC was 23.9% for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to 17.7% for the year ended December 31, 2012 .
We were formed on October 6, 2011 and received proceeds from our initial capitalization in December 2011. For the period from October 6, 2011 to December 31, 2011, we incurred $1.1m of general and administrative expenses related to initial start-up costs.
Segment Results—Years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
The determination of our business segments is based on the manner in which management monitors the performance of our operations. Our business currently comprises two operating segments—Property and Casualty Reinsurance and Catastrophe Risk Management. We have also identified a corporate function that includes our investment results and general and administrative expenses related to our corporate activities.
Property and Casualty Reinsurance
Gross premiums written . Gross premiums written increased by $ 203.2 million , or 106.7% , to $393.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $190.4 million for year ended December 31, 2012 .
We began underwriting on January 1, 2012 and continue to cultivate our underwriting relationships with intermediaries and reinsurance buyers and as a result submission flow continues to increase. We write a small number of large contracts so individual renewals or new business can have a significant impact on premiums recognised in a period. In addition, our quota share contracts are subject to significant judgment in the amount of premiums that we ultimately recognize. Changes in premium estimates are recorded in the period they are determined and can be significant. We also offer customized solutions to our clients, including adverse development covers, on which we will not have a regular renewal opportunity. Furthermore, we record gross premiums written and earned for adverse development covers, which are considered retroactive reinsurance contracts, at the inception of the contract. This premium recognition policy can further distort the comparability of premiums earned in a period and trends.
As a result of these factors, we may experience volatility in the amount of gross premiums written and earned and period to period comparisons may not be meaningful.

81



The following table provides a breakdown of our property and casualty reinsurance segment’s gross premiums written by line of business for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 :
 
2013
 
2012
 
($ in thousands)
Property
$
67,612

 
17.2
%
 
$
103,174

 
54.2
%
Casualty
210,017

 
53.4
%
 
44,700

 
23.5
%
Specialty
115,959

 
29.4
%
 
42,500

 
22.3
%
 
$
393,588

 
100.0
%
 
$
190,374

 
100.0
%

The change in gross premiums written for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 was driven by:
Factors resulting in increases:
We wrote $269.0 million of new business for the year ended December 31, 2013 , consisting of $19.5 million of new property business, $143.4 million of new casualty business and $106.1 million of new specialty business.
Changes in renewal premiums during the year ended December 31, 2013 resulted in increased premiums of $21.7 million. Premiums can change on renewals of contracts for a number of factors including: changes in our line size or participation, changes in the underlying premium volume of the client's program, pricing trends as well as other contractual terms and conditions. The increase was primarily due to one contract that was written for one year in 2012 and renewed as a two year contract in 2013 with other generally offsetting changes on other renewal business.
We amended two existing contracts to increase coverage resulting in $21.0 million of premium.
Factors resulting in decreases:
Reductions in premium estimates relating to prior years' contracts were $35.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily due to return premiums on contracts that expired during the period that included provisions within the contract to return the unearned premiums at expiration. For contracts that renewed or were written in 2013 with these provisions, we considered the expected return premium in determining our initial premium estimates.
We did not renew four reinsurance contracts accounting for $72.8 million of premiums for the year ended December 31, 2012, with three of the contracts not renewing as a result of pricing and other changes in reinsurance contract structure, terms and conditions. In addition, our crop contract which accounted for $42.5 million of premium for the year ended December 31, 2012 was written in 2013 with a new counterparty and is included as $35.0 million of new business above.
Premiums ceded . The $10.0 million of premiums ceded for the year ended December 31, 2013 related to the purchase of retrocessional protection related to our one assumed crop contract. There was no premiums ceded for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Net premiums earned . Net premiums earned for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased $ 116.1 million , or 120.3% , to $212.6 million . Third Point Reinsurance Company Ltd. ("Third Point Re") began underwriting on January 1, 2012. The year ended December 31, 2013 reflects net premiums earned on a larger in-force underwriting portfolio, including new business written and increased premiums from renewals, compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. In addition, the year ended December 31, 2013, includes net premiums earned of $39.8 million related to retroactive reinsurance contracts where we recorded the gross premiums written and earned at the inception of the contract. We did not write any retroactive reinsurance contracts for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Net loss and loss adjustment expenses . Net loss and loss expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $ 139.6 million , or 65.7% of net premiums earned, compared to $ 80.3 million , or 83.2% of net premiums earned, for the year ended December 31, 2012 .

82



The reinsurance contracts that we write have a wide range of initial loss ratio estimates. As a result, our net loss and loss expense ratio can vary significantly from period to period depending on the mix of business. For example, property quota share contracts have a lower initial loss ratio compared to other casualty and specialty lines of business. In general, our contracts have similar expected composite ratios (combined ratio before general and administrative expenses) and; therefore, contracts with higher initial loss ratio estimates have lower acquisition cost ratios and contracts with lower initial loss ratios have higher acquisition cost ratios. Retroactive reinsurance contracts have a higher initial loss ratio since the premiums are generally based on the net loss and loss adjustment reserves and do not include acquisition related and other expenses. In addition, we record the gross premiums written and earned and the net losses as incurred for retroactive reinsurance contracts at the inception of the contract, which can also impact the mix of premiums earned in a particular period.
The decrease in the loss ratio for the year ended December 31, 2013 was primarily due to the crop losses that were recorded in the year ended December 31, 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we increased our crop loss from our initial loss estimate by $13.4 million, or 21.3 percentage points. This crop reinsurance contract accounted for $10.0 million of net underwriting loss for the year ended December 31, 2012.
We recorded $1.3 million, or 0.6 percentage points, of net favorable prior years' reserve development for the year ended December 31, 2013. We commenced underwriting in 2012 and therefore did not have any prior years' reserve development for the 2012 year.
For the year ended December 31, 2013, we also recorded a decrease of $3.4 million in loss and loss adjustment expense reserves due to a decrease in our premium estimate related to our crop contract. The reserve and premium adjustments generally offset resulting in no net underwriting income or net loss ratio impact for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Acquisition costs . Acquisition costs include commissions, brokerage and excise taxes. Acquisition costs are presented net of commissions ceded under reinsurance contracts. Acquisition costs for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $ 67.0 million , or 31.5% of net premiums earned, compared to $ 24.6 million , or 25.5% of net premiums earned, for the year ended December 31, 2012 . The acquisition cost ratio for the year ended December 31, 2013 was higher due to a change in business mix. The acquisition cost ratio for the year ended December 31, 2012 included a higher proportion of net premiums earned related to one crop contract which had a lower acquisition cost ratio.
The reinsurance contracts that we write have a wide range of acquisition cost ratios. As a result, our acquisition cost ratio can vary significantly from period to period depending on the mix of business. For example, our property quota share contracts have a higher initial acquisition cost ratio compared to other casualty and specialty lines of business. Property quota share contracts have a higher expense component due to inuring catastrophe reinsurance which increases the acquisition cost ratio on those contracts.  Our property quota share contracts are structured to limit the amount of property catastrophe exposure we assume.  As a result, inuring catastrophe reinsurance for the property catastrophe exposure reduces the amount of premium we assume relative to the acquisition costs or is an additional component of the acquisition costs. In general, our contracts have similar expected composite ratios (combined ratio before general and administrative expenses) and therefore, contracts with higher initial loss ratio estimates have lower acquisition cost ratios and contracts with lower initial loss ratios have higher acquisition cost ratios. Retroactive reinsurance contracts generally have a low initial acquisition cost ratio. In addition, we record the gross premiums written and earned for retroactive reinsurance contracts at the inception of the contract, which can also impact the mix of premiums earned in a particular period. Furthermore, a number of our contracts have a sliding scale or profit commission feature that will vary depending on the expected loss expense for the contract. As a result, changes in estimates of loss and loss adjustment expenses on a contract can result in changes in the sliding scale commissions and a contract's overall acquisition cost ratio.
General and administrative expenses . General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $ 21.8 million , or 10.3% of net premiums earned, compared to $ 20.3 million , or 21.0% of net premiums earned, for the year ended December 31, 2012 .
The increase in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the prior year period was primarily due to additional share compensation expense as a result of the performance condition having been met as a result of the IPO. In addition, we have increased headcount and related staff costs as we continued to

83



build out our management team and infrastructure throughout 2012 and 2013. These increases were partially offset by employee signing bonuses included in the year ended December 31, 2012. Although the general and administrative expenses increased compared to the prior year period, the general and administrative expense ratio is lower due to proportionately higher net premiums earned compared to the prior year period.
Catastrophe Risk Management
The Catastrophe Reinsurer wrote no business before January 1, 2013. From January 1, 2013, the underwriting results of the Catastrophe Reinsurer as well as results of the Catastrophe Fund, the entities for which the Catastrophe Fund Manager underwrites and manages catastrophe risk, are captured with the Catastrophe Fund Manager in this segment. We are currently required to consolidate the results of the Catastrophe Fund and the Catastrophe Reinsurer with our other operations because we control a majority of the outstanding interests in these entities. However, as an open-ended investment fund, the Catastrophe Fund is continuing to market its interests to third-party investors. We expect that the Catastrophe Fund may achieve levels of third-party investment to potentially allow us to deconsolidate its results in the future.
Gross premiums written. Gross premiums written of $8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 consisted of property catastrophe business written.
Net premiums earned. Net premiums earned was $ 8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 .
Net investment income . Net investment income of $ 4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 consisting of $ 4.3 million related to net gain on derivative reinsurance contracts written by the Catastrophe Reinsurer.
Net loss and loss adjustment expenses. Net loss and loss adjustment expenses was $ 0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 relating to tornadoes, hail and severe thunderstorms that occurred in the United States of America in March 2013.
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs include commissions, brokerage and excise taxes. Acquisition costs for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $ 1.0 million , or 11.9% of net premiums earned.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $ 3.9 million compared to $ 1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 . The Catastrophe Reinsurer and Catastrophe Fund were incorporated in June 2012 and the Catastrophe Reinsurer did not begin underwriting until January 1, 2013. The 2012 period reflects certain start-up related expenses compared to a full period of operations for 2013. General and administrative expenses consist of costs associated with the employee leasing agreement, cat modeling and legal and accounting expenses.
Corporate function
Investment results
For the year ended December 31, 2013 , we recorded net investment income of $248.8 million , compared to $ 136.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 .
The primary driver of our net investment income is the returns generated by our investment portfolio managed by our investment manager, Third Point LLC. The return on investments managed by Third Point LLC was 23.9% for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to 17.7% for the year ended December 31, 2012 . The following is a summary of the net investment return on investments managed by Third Point LLC by investment strategy:

2013

2012
Long/short equities
17.5
%

7.8
%
Asset-backed securities
3.0
%

2.3
%
Corporate credit
2.1
%

3.2
%
Macro and other
1.3
%

4.4
%

23.9
%

17.7
%

84



The returns for the year ended December 31, 2013 were driven primarily by equity positions and to a lesser extent by gains in structured credit, corporate credit and macro positions. Net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2013 also benefited from higher average investments managed by Third Point LLC compared to the prior year periods due to the net proceeds generated by our IPO and float contributed by our property and casualty reinsurance operations.
All of our assets managed by Third Point LLC are held in a separate account and managed under an investment management agreement whereby Third Point Advisors LLC, an affiliate of Third Point LLC, has a non-controlling interest in the assets held in the separate account. The value of the non-controlling interest is equal to the amounts invested by Third Point Advisors LLC, plus performance fees paid by us to Third Point Advisors LLC and investment gains and losses thereon.
Also impacting net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2013 was the allocation of $4.9 million of net investment expense related to deposit and reinsurance contracts compared to $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Our investment manager, Third Point LLC, manages several funds and may manage other client accounts besides ours, some of which have, or may have, objectives and investment portfolio compositions similar to ours. Because of the similarity or potential similarity of our investment portfolio to these others, and because, as a matter of ordinary course, Third Point LLC provides its clients, including us, and investors in its main hedge funds with results of their respective investment portfolios following the last day of each month, those other clients or investors indirectly may have material nonpublic information regarding our investment portfolio. To address this issue, and to comply with Regulation FD, we will continue to post on our website under the heading Investment Portfolio Returns located in the Investors section of the website, following the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange on the last business day of each month, our preliminary monthly investment results for that month, with additional information regarding our monthly investment results to be posted following the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange on the first business day of the following month.
General and administrative expenses related to corporate activities
General and administrative expenses allocated to our corporate function include allocations of payroll and related costs for certain executives and non-underwriting staff that spend a portion of their time on corporate activities. We also allocate a portion of overhead and other related costs based on a related headcount analysis. For the year ended December 31, 2013 , general and administrative expenses allocated to the corporate function were $ 7.3 million compared to $ 5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 . The increase compared to the prior year period was primarily due to additional share compensation expense as a result of a performance condition relating to vesting having been met as a result of the IPO. In addition, we have increased headcount and related staff costs as we continued to build out our management team and infrastructure throughout 2012 and 2013. These increases were partially offset by employee signing bonuses included in the year ended December 31, 2012. We also incurred increased legal and other professional advisor expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 as a result of now operating as a public company.
General and administrative expenses for the period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011 included $1.1 million related to start-up expenses.

85



Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our investment portfolio is concentrated in tradeable securities and is valued to market each day. Pursuant to our investment guidelines as specified in our Investment Management Agreement with Third Point LLC, at least 60% of our portfolio must be invested in securities of publicly traded companies and governments of OECD high income countries, asset-backed securities, cash, cash equivalents and gold and other precious metals. We can liquidate all or a portion of our investment portfolio at any time with not less than three days’ notice to pay claims on our reinsurance contracts, and with not less than five days’ notice to pay for expenses or on not less than 30 days’ notice in order to satisfy a requirement of A.M. Best. Since we do not write excess of loss property catastrophe contracts or other types of reinsurance contracts that are typically subject to sudden, acute, liquidity demands, we believe the liquidity provided by our investment portfolio will be sufficient to satisfy all liquidity requirements.
General
The Company is a holding company and has no substantial operations of its own. Its assets consist primarily of its investments in subsidiaries. The Company’s ability to pay dividends or return capital to shareholders will depend upon the availability of dividends or other statutorily permissible distributions from those subsidiaries.
We and our Bermuda subsidiaries are subject to Bermuda regulatory constraints that affect our ability to pay dividends. Under the Companies Act, as amended, a Bermuda company may declare or pay a dividend out of distributable reserves only if it has reasonable grounds for believing that it is, or would after the payment, be able to pay its liabilities as they become due and if the realizable value of its assets would thereby not be less than its liabilities. Under the Insurance Act, Third Point Re, as a Class 4 insurer, is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if it is in breach of its minimum solvency margin (“MSM”), enhanced capital ratio (“ECR”) or minimum liquidity ratio or if the declaration or payment of such dividend would cause such a breach. Where Third Point Re, as a Class 4 insurer, fails to meet its MSM or minimum liquidity ratio on the last day of any financial year, it is prohibited from declaring or paying any dividends during the next financial year without the approval of the BMA.
In addition, Third Point Re, as a Class 4 insurer, is prohibited from declaring or paying in any financial year dividends of more than 25% of its total statutory capital and surplus (as shown on its previous financial year’s statutory balance sheet) unless it files (at least seven days before payment of such dividends) with the BMA an affidavit signed by at least 2 directors (one of whom must be a Bermuda resident director if any of the insurer’s directors are resident in Bermuda) and the principal representative stating that it will continue to meet its solvency margin and minimum liquidity ratio.
As of December 31, 2013, Third Point Re could pay dividends in 2014 to the Company of approximately $325.9 million (2012 - $206.1 million ) without providing an affidavit to the BMA.
Liquidity and Cash Flows
Our cash flows from operations generally represent the difference between: (l) premiums collected and investment earnings realized and (2) losses and loss expenses paid reinsurance purchased an underwriting and other expenses paid. Cash flows from operations may differ substantially from net income. The potential for a large claim under a reinsurance contract means that substantial and unpredictable payments may need to be made within relatively short periods of time.
Our sources of funds primarily consist of premiums written, reinsurance recoveries, investment income and proceeds from sales and redemptions of investments. Cash is used primarily to pay loss and loss adjustment expenses, reinsurance premiums, acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses and to purchase investments.
Cash flows provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $ 9.2 million compared to cash flows used in operating activities of $ 32.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and cash flows used in operating activities of $1.6 million for the period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011. Cash flows from operating activities generally represent net premiums collected less loss and loss adjustment expenses, acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses paid.

86



Cash flows used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $ 397.6 million compared to cash flows used in investment activities of $ 766.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 . The cash flows used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 reflects the investment of the net proceeds from our IPO and the investment of float generated by our reinsurance operations. The cash flows used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 , reflected the initial investment of our portfolio. There were no cash flows used for investing activities for the period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011.
Cash flows provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $ 386.0 million compared to $ 228.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and $ 605.4 million for the period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011. The cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 relate primarily to the net proceeds generated by our IPO and new deposit liability contracts entered into in the year ended December 31, 2013 . The cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 consisted of the receipt of subscriptions receivable, net of costs. The cash flows from financing activities for the period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011 consisted of the net proceeds generated from the initial capitalization of the Company.
For the period from inception until December 31, 2013 , we have had sufficient cash flow from proceeds of our initial capitalization and IPO and from operations to meet our liquidity requirements. We expect that projected operating and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months will be met by our balance of cash, cash flows generated from underwriting activities and investment income. We may incur indebtedness in the future if we determine that it would be an efficient part of our capital structure.
In addition, we expect that the net proceeds from our IPO and cash flow from operations will provide us with the financial flexibility to execute our strategic objectives. Our ability to generate cash, however, is subject to our performance, general economic conditions, industry trends and other factors. To the extent that the net proceeds from our IPO, combined with existing cash and cash equivalents, investment returns and operating cash flow are insufficient to fund our future activities and requirements, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt financing. If we issue equity securities in order to raise additional funds, substantial dilution to existing shareholders may occur. If we raise cash through the issuance of additional indebtedness, we may be subject to additional contractual restrictions on our business. There is no assurance that we would be able to raise the additional funds on favorable terms or at all.
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our consolidated results of operations to date. The effects of inflation are considered implicitly in pricing our reinsurance contracts. Loss reserves are established to recognize likely loss settlements at the date payment is made. Those reserves inherently recognize the effects of inflation. However, the actual effects of inflation on our results cannot be accurately known until claims are ultimately resolved.
Cash and restricted cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash held in banks and other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturity dates of ninety days or less.
Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist of cash held with brokers securing letters of credit issued under letter of credit facilities.

Letter of Credit Facilities

As of December 31, 2013 , we had entered into the following letter of credit facilities, which automatically renew annually unless terminated by either party in accordance with the required notice period:  

87



 
Facility
 
Renewal date
 
Notice period (Unused Facility Portion)
 
($ in thousands)
 
 
 
 
BNP Paribas
$
100,000

 
February 15, 2015
 
 60 days prior to termination date
Citibank (1)
150,000

 
January 23, 2015
 
 90 days prior to termination date
J.P. Morgan
50,000

 
August 22, 2014
 
 60 days prior to termination date
 
$
300,000

 
 
 
 
(1)
Effective January 1, 2013, the Citibank facility was reduced from $250 million to $150 million.
As of December 31, 2013 , $ 127.3 million ( December 31, 2012 - $60.9 million ) of letters of credit, representing 42.4% of the total available facilities, had been drawn upon ( December 31, 2012 15.3% (based on total available facilities of $400 million)).
Under the facilities, we provide collateral that may consist of equity securities, repurchase agreements, restricted cash, and cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2013 , total cash and cash equivalents with a fair value of $ 100.6 million ( December 31, 2012 - $ 64.8 million ) were pledged as security against the letters of credit issued. These amounts are included in restricted cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated balance sheets. Each of the facilities contain customary events of default and restrictive covenants, including but not limited to, limitations on liens on collateral, transactions with affiliates, mergers and sales of assets, as well as solvency and maintenance of certain minimum pledged equity requirements, A.M. Best Company rating of “A-” or higher, and restricts issuance of any debt without the consent of the letter of credit provider. Additionally, if an event of default exists, as defined in the letter of credit facilities, we will be prohibited from paying dividends. We were in compliance with all of the covenants as of December 31, 2013 .
Financial Condition
Shareholders’ equity
As of December 31, 2013 , total shareholders’ equity was $ 1,510.4 million compared to $928.3 million as of December 31, 2012 . This increase was primarily due to net proceeds of $286.0 million generated in our IPO, net income of $ 227.3 million and contributions from non-controlling interests of $ 88.3 million consisting of $25.3 million related to additional capital called by the Catastrophe Fund and $62.3 million related to the investment joint venture, primarily as a result of performance fees earned for 2013. These increases were partially offset by distributions of non-controlling interests of $ 35.1 million related to the investment joint venture.
Investments
As of December 31, 2013 , total cash and net investments managed by Third Point LLC at fair value was $1,581.0 million compared to $972.3 million as of December 31, 2012 . The increase was primarily due to the net proceeds of $286.0 million generated in our IPO, float generated by our reinsurance operations and net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2013 .














88



Contractual Obligations

As of December 31, 2013:
 
Total
 
Less than 1 year
 
1-3 years
 
3-5 years
 
More than 5 years
 
($ in thousands)
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves (1)
$
134,221

 
$
68,922

 
$
36,566

 
$
12,936

 
$
15,797

Other operating agreements (2)
1,653

 
547

 
1,106

 

 

Rental leases (3)
770

 
402

 
368

 

 

Deposit liabilities (4)
148,061

 
679

 
65,402

 
43,094

 
38,886

 
$
284,705

 
$
70,550

 
$
103,442

 
$
56,030

 
$
54,683


(1)
We have estimated the expected payout pattern of the loss and loss adjustment expense reserves by applying estimated payout patterns by contract. The amount and timing of actual loss payments could differ materially from the estimated payouts in the table above. Please refer to Critical Accounting Estimates-Reserve for losses and loss expenses for additional information.
(2)
On December 20, 2011, Third Point Reinsurance Company Ltd. acquired from Netjets Sales Inc., two 12.5%, five year, undivided interests in two aircraft. The agreement with Netjets provides for monthly management fees, occupied hourly fees and other fees.
(3)
We lease office space at Chesney House in Bermuda. This two year lease is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2015, with an option to renew for an additional three years.
(4)
See Note 12 to consolidated financial statements for detailed information on deposit liability contracts. For purposes of this contractual obligations table, we have included estimates of future interest accruals and what we expect the deposit liability contracts would settle for at their probable commutation dates.

Off-Balance Sheet Commitments and Arrangements
We have no obligations, assets or liabilities, other than those derivatives in our investment portfolio and disclosed in our notes to consolidated financial statements, which would be considered off-balance sheet arrangements. We do not participate in transactions that create relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, often referred to as variable interest entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We believe we are principally exposed to the following types of market risk:
equity price risk;
foreign currency risk;
interest rate risk;
commodity price risk;
credit risk; and
political risk.
Equity Price Risk
Our investment manager, Third Point LLC, continually tracks the performance and exposures of our entire investment portfolio, each strategy and sector, and selective individual securities. A particular focus is placed on “beta” exposure, which is the portion of the portfolio that is directly correlated to risks and movements of the equity market as a whole (usually represented by the S&P 500 index) as opposed to idiosyncratic risks and factors associated with a specific position. Further, the performance of our investment portfolio has historically been compared to several market indices, including the S&P 500, CS/Tremont Event Driven Index, HFRI Event Driven Index, and others.
As of December 31, 2013 , our investment portfolio included long and short equity securities, along with certain equity-based derivative instruments, the carrying values of which are primarily based on quoted market prices.

89



Generally, market prices of common equity securities are subject to fluctuation, which could cause the amount to be realized upon the closing of the position to differ significantly from their current reported value. This risk is partly mitigated by the presence of both long and short equity securities in our investment portfolio. As of December 31, 2013 , a 10% decline in the value of all equity and equity-linked derivatives would result in a loss of $111.5 million, or 7.1% in the fair value of our total net investments managed by Third Point LLC.
Computations of the prospective effects of hypothetical equity price changes are based on numerous assumptions, including the maintenance of the existing level and composition of investment securities and should not be relied on as indicative of future results.
Foreign Currency Risk
As of December 31, 2013 , 100% of our reinsurance contracts were denominated in U.S. dollars, and any losses related to these contracts would be paid in U.S. dollars. As such, were not exposed to foreign currency risk with regard to our underwriting operations as of December 31, 2013 .
Third Point LLC continually measures foreign currency exposures in the investment portfolio and compares current exposures to historical movement within the relevant currencies. Within the typical course of business, Third Point LLC may decide to hedge foreign currency risk within our investment portfolio by using short-term forward contracts; however, from time to time Third Point LLC may determine not to hedge based on its views of the likely movements of the underlying currency.
We are exposed to foreign currency risk through cash, forwards, options and investments in securities denominated in foreign currencies. Foreign currency exchange rate risk is the potential for adverse changes in the U.S. dollar value of investments (long and short) and foreign currency derivative instruments, which we employ from both a speculative and risk management perspective, due to a change in the exchange rate of the foreign currency in which cash and financial instruments are denominated. As of December 31, 2013 , our total net (short) exposure to foreign denominated securities represented (6.2)% of our investment portfolio including cash and cash equivalents, was $(97.7) million.
The following table summarizes the net impact that 10% increase and decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar against select foreign currencies would have had on the value of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2013:
 
10% increase in U.S. dollar
 
10% decrease in U.S. dollar
Foreign Currency
Change in fair value
 
Change in fair value as % of investment portfolio
 
Change in fair value
 
Change in fair value as % of investment portfolio
 
($ in thousands)
Euro
$
8,873

 
0.56
%
 
$
(8,873
)
 
(0.56
)%
Japanese Yen
341

 
0.02
%
 
(341
)
 
(0.02
)%
British Pound
783

 
0.05
%
 
(783
)
 
(0.05
)%
Other
631

 
0.04
%
 
(631
)
 
(0.04
)%
Total
$
10,628

 
0.67
%
 
$
(10,628
)
 
(0.67
)%
Interest Rate Risk
Our investment portfolio includes interest rate sensitive securities, such as corporate and sovereign debt instruments, asset-backed securities (“ABS”), and interest rate options. One key market risk exposure for any debt instrument is interest rate risk. As interest rates rise, the market value of our long fixed-income portfolio falls, and the opposite is also true as interest rates fall. Additionally, some of our corporate and sovereign debt instruments, ABS and derivative investments may also be credit sensitive and their value may indirectly fluctuate with changes in interest rates.

90



The effects of interest rate movement have historically not had a material impact on the performance of our investment portfolio as managed by Third Point LLC. However, our investment manager monitors the potential effects of interest rate shifts by performing stress tests against the portfolio composition using a proprietary in-house risk system.
The following table summarizes the impact that a 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates would have on the value of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2013 :
 
100 basis point increase in interest rates
 
100 basis point decrease in interest rates
 
Change in fair value
 
Change in fair value as % of investment portfolio
 
Change in fair value
 
Change in fair value as % of investment portfolio
 
($ in thousands)
Corporate and Sovereign Debt Instruments
$
(1,434
)
 
(0.09
)%
 
$
2,364

 
0.15
%
Asset Backed Securities (1)
(9,240
)
 
(0.59
)%
 
9,471

 
0.60
%
Net exposure to interest rate risk
$
(10,674
)
 
(0.68
)%
 
$
11,835

 
0.75
%

(1)
Includes instruments for which durations are available on December 31, 2013 . Includes a convexity adjustment if convexity is available. Not included are mortgage hedges which would reduce the impact of rate changes.
For the purposes of the above tables, the hypothetical impact of changes in interest rates on debt instruments, ABS, and interest rate options was determined based on the interest rates and credit spreads applicable to each instrument individually. We and our investment manager periodically monitor our net exposure to interest rate risk and generally do not expect changes in interest rates to have a materially adverse impact on our operations.
Commodity Price Risk
In managing our investment portfolio, Third Point LLC periodically monitors and actively trades to take advantage of, and/or seeks to minimize any damage from, fluctuations in commodity prices. As our investment manager, Third Point LLC may choose to opportunistically make a long or short investment in a commodity or in a security directly impacted by the price of a commodity as a response to market developments.
As of December 31, 2013 , our investment portfolio included exposure to changes in commodity prices, through ownership of physical commodities and commodity-linked securities. We purchase such investments from time to time from both a speculative and risk management perspective. Generally, market prices of commodities are subject to fluctuation. As of December 31, 2013 , a 10% decline in the price of each of these commodities and commodity-linked securities would have resulted in a loss of $0.3 million in the fair value of our total net investments managed by Third Point LLC.
We and our investment manager periodically monitor our exposure to commodity price fluctuations and generally do not expect changes in commodity prices to have a materially adverse impact on our operations.
Credit Risk
We are exposed to credit risk from our clients relating to balances receivable under our reinsurance contracts, including premiums receivable, and the possibility that counterparties may default on their obligations to us. The risk of counterparty default is partially mitigated by the fact that any amount owed to us from a reinsurance counterparty is netted against any claims related losses we would pay in the future. We monitor the collectability of these balances on a regular basis.

91



Third Point LLC typically performs intensive fundamental analysis on the broader markets, credit spreads, security-specific information, and the underlying issuers of debt securities that are contained in our investment portfolio.
In addition, the securities, commodities, and cash in our investment portfolio are held with several prime brokers, subjecting us to the related credit risk from the possibility that one or more of them may default on their obligations to us. Our investment manager closely and regularly monitors the concentration of credit risk with each broker and if necessary, transfers cash or securities among brokers to diversify and mitigate our credit risk.
Political Risk
We are exposed to political risk to the extent that our investment manager trades securities that are listed on various U.S. and foreign exchanges and markets. The governments in any of these jurisdictions could impose restrictions, regulations or other measures, which may have a material impact on our investment strategy and underwriting operations. We currently do not write political risk coverage on our insurance contracts; however, changes in government laws and regulations may impact our underwriting operations.
In managing our investment portfolio, Third Point LLC routinely monitors and assesses relative levels of risks associated with local political and market conditions and focuses its investments primarily in countries in which it believes the rule of law is respected and followed, thereby affording more predictable outcomes of investments in that country.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Please refer to Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for details of recently issued accounting standards.
Under Section 102(b) of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, an “emerging growth company” such as the Company can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. Pursuant to Section 107(b) of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, we have irrevocably elected to “opt out” of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

See our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and required financial statement schedules commencing on page F-1.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of December 31, 2013 . Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2013 .
(b)     Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no material changes to our internal control over financial reporting in connection with the evaluation required by Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

92



Item 9B. Other Information

Not applicable.
Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Certain of the information required by this item relating to the executive officers of the Company may be found starting at page 60. The balance of the information required by this item is omitted because a definitive proxy statement that involves the election of directors will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation

This item is omitted because a definitive proxy statement that involves the election of directors will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

Information relating to this item is set forth in this Annual Report under the caption “Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities - Equity Compensation Plan Information”.

The balance of the information required by this item is omitted because a definitive proxy statement that involves the election of directors will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

This item is omitted because a definitive proxy statement that involves the election of directors will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

This item is omitted because a definitive proxy statement that involves the election of directors will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV











93



Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
3.1*
Memorandum of Association
3.1.1
Certificate of Deposit of Memorandum of Increase of Share Capital
3.2
Bye-laws of Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
4.1*
Specimen Common Share Certificate
4.2*
Registration Rights Agreement, by and among the Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. and each of the Members, dated as of December 22, 2011
4.3*
Warrant to Purchase Common Shares issued to KEP TP Holdings, L.P., dated as of December 22, 2011
4.4*
Warrant to Purchase Common Shares issued to KIA TP Holdings, L.P., dated as of December 22, 2011
4.5*
Warrant to Purchase Common Shares issued to Pine Brook LVR, L.P., dated as of December 22, 2011
4.6*
Warrant to Purchase Common Shares issued to P RE Opportunities Ltd., dated as of December 22, 2011
4.7*
Warrant Subscription Agreement, by and among Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. and each of the signatories thereto, dated as of December 22, 2011
4.8*
Agreement among Members by and among Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. and each of the Members, dated as of December 22, 2011
4.9*
Founders’ Agreement, by and among Third Point Reinsurance Ltd., KEP TP Bermuda Ltd., KIA TP Bermuda Ltd., Pine Brook LVR, L.P., P RE Opportunities Ltd. and Dowling Capital Partners I, L.P.
4.10*
Closing Side Letter, dated as of December 22, 201
10.1*
Joint Venture and Investment Management Agreement, by and among Third Point Reinsurance Ltd., Third Point Reinsurance Company, Ltd., Third Point Advisors LLC and Third Point LLC, dated as of December 22, 2011
10.2***
Employment Agreement between Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. and John R. Berger, dated as of December 22, 2011
10.3***
Employment Agreement between Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. and J. Robert Bredahl, dated as of January 26, 2012
10.4***
Employment Agreement between Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. and Daniel Victor Malloy III, dated as of January 23, 2012
10.5***
Share Incentive Plan
10.6***
Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement
10.6.1**
Form of Director Restricted Share Award Agreement
10.7***
Form of Nonqualified Share Option Agreement under the Share Incentive Plan
10.8***
Form of Director Service Agreement
10.8.1**
Form of Director Service Agreement (Adopted November 2013)
10.9***
Management Compensation Cash Bonus Pool
10.10***
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan
10.11***
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. Annual Incentive Plan
10.22*
Trademark License Agreement between Third Point LLC and Third Point Reinsurance Ltd., dated as of December 22, 2011
10.23*
Trademark License Agreement between Third Point LLC and Third Point Reinsurance Company Ltd., dated as of December 22, 2011
10.24*
Net Retained Lines Quota Share Reinsurance Contract issued to Narragansett Bay Insurance Company, dated as of January 31, 2013

E-2


10.25*
Shareholders Agreement between Third Point Reinsurance Investment Management Ltd., Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. and Hiscox Insurance Company (Bermuda) Limited, dated as of December 11, 2012
10.26†
Letter Agreement dated as of December 22, 2011
10.27***
Section 409A Specified Employee Policy
10.28***
Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement
10.28.1
Schedule of Signatories to the Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement
10.29**
Director Compensation Policy
14.1*
Code of Ethics
21.1*
List of Subsidiaries
23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

24.1
Power of Attorney signed by each of the members of the Board of Directors on February 25, 2014.
31.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
31.2
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
32.1±
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2±
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS††
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH††
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL††
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB††
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE††
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF††
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
*
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number filed as part of the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-189960) which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2013.
**
Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements
    
±
This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

Registrant has omitted portions of the referenced exhibit pursuant to a request for confidential treatment under Rule 406 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act).

††
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in these exhibits is furnished and deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.



E-3




E-4


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Pembroke, Bermuda, on this 27th day of February, 2014.
THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
(Registrant)
By:
/s/ John R. Berger                 
Name: John R. Berger
Title:
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
 
Title
Date
/s/ John R. Berger
 
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 27, 2014
John R. Berger
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ J. Robert Bredahl
 
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 27, 2014
J. Robert Bredahl
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Christopher S. Coleman
 
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
February 27, 2014
Christopher S. Coleman
 
 
 
 
 
*                                                  
 
Director
February 27, 2014
Christopher L. Collins
 
 
 
 
 
*                                                      
 
Director
February 27, 2014
Steven E. Fass
 
 
 
 
 
*                                                      
 
Director
February 27, 2014
Rafe de la Gueronniere
 
 
 
 
 
*                                                      
 
Director
February 27, 2014
Mary R. Hennessy
 
 
 
 
 
*                                                      
 
Director
February 27, 2014
Neil McConachie
 
 
 
 
 
*                                             
 
Director
February 27, 2014
Mark Parkin
 
 
 
 
 
*                                                      
 
Director
February 27, 2014
William Spiegel
 
 
 
 
 
*                                                      
 
Director
February 27, 2014
Joshua L. Targoff
 
 
 
 
 
 
* By:
/s/ Tonya L. Marshall
 
 
 
Name:
Title:
Name: Tonya L. Marshall
Attorney-in-Fact
 
 
 

E-5




THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

 
Page  
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
F-2
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012
F-3
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011
F-4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011
F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011
F-6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
F-7
Schedule I - Summary of Investments - Other than Investments in Related Parties
F-46
Schedule II - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
F-47
Schedule III - Supplementary Insurance Information
F-50
Schedule IV - Reinsurance
F-51
All other schedules and notes specified under Regulation S-X are omitted because they are either not applicable, not required or the information called for therein appears in response to the items in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. and its subsidiaries listed on the above index.


F-1


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ Ernst & Young Ltd.

Ernst & Young Ltd.
Hamilton, Bermuda
February 27, 2014




F-2



THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share amounts)
 
December 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Assets
 
 
 
Equity securities, trading, at fair value (cost - $824,723; 2012 - $450,766)
$
954,111

 
$
500,929

Debt securities, trading, at fair value (cost - $408,754; 2012 - $249,110)
441,424

 
279,331

Other investments, at fair value
65,329

 
157,430

Total investments in securities and commodities
1,460,864

 
937,690

Cash and cash equivalents
31,625

 
34,005

Restricted cash and cash equivalents
193,577

 
77,627

Due from brokers
98,386

 
131,785

Securities purchased under an agreement to sell
38,147

 
60,408

Derivative assets, at fair value
39,045

 
25,628

Interest and dividends receivable
2,615

 
2,088

Reinsurance balances receivable
191,763

 
84,280

Deferred acquisition costs, net
91,193

 
45,383

Loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable
9,277

 

Other assets
3,398

 
3,123

Total assets
$
2,159,890

 
$
1,402,017

Liabilities and shareholders' equity
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
9,456

 
$
5,278

Reinsurance balances payable
9,081

 

Deposit liabilities
120,946

 
50,446

Unearned premium reserves
265,187

 
93,893

Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
134,331

 
67,271

Securities sold, not yet purchased, at fair value
56,056

 
176,454

Due to brokers
44,870

 
66,107

Derivative liabilities, at fair value
8,819

 
12,992

Interest and dividends payable
748

 
1,255

Total liabilities
649,494

 
473,696

Commitments and contingent liabilities

 

Shareholders' equity
 
 
 
Preference shares (par value $0.10; authorized, 30,000,000; none issued)

 

Common shares (par value $0.10; authorized, 300,000,000; issued and outstanding, 103,888,916 (2012: 78,432,132))
10,389

 
7,843

Additional paid-in capital
1,055,690

 
762,430

Retained earnings
325,582

 
98,271

Shareholders’ equity attributable to shareholders
1,391,661

 
868,544

Non-controlling interests
118,735

 
59,777

Total shareholders' equity
1,510,396

 
928,321

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
$
2,159,890

 
$
1,402,017

 
 
 
 
The accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-3


THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation)
to December 31, 2011
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share amounts)
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross premiums written
 
$
401,937

 
$
190,374

 
$

Gross premiums ceded
 
(9,975
)
 

 

Net premiums written
 
391,962

 
190,374

 

Change in net unearned premium reserves
 
(171,295
)
 
(93,893
)
 

Net premiums earned
 
220,667

 
96,481

 

Net investment income
 
253,203

 
136,422

 

Total revenues
 
473,870

 
232,903

 

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net
 
139,812

 
80,306

 

Acquisition costs, net
 
67,944

 
24,604

 

General and administrative expenses
 
33,036

 
27,376

 
1,130

Total expenses
 
240,792

 
132,286

 
1,130

Income (loss) including non-controlling interests
 
233,078

 
100,617

 
(1,130
)
Income attributable to non-controlling interests
 
(5,767
)
 
(1,216
)
 

Net income (loss)
 
$
227,311

 
$
99,401

 
$
(1,130
)
Earnings (loss) per share
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
$
2.58

 
$
1.26

 
$
(0.01
)
Diluted
 
$
2.54

 
$
1.26

 
$
(0.01
)
Weighted average number of common shares used in the determination of earnings (loss) per share
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
87,505,540

 
78,432,132

 
78,432,132

Diluted
 
88,970,531

 
78,598,236

 
78,432,132

The accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.









F-4


THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation)
to December 31, 2011
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts)
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Common shares
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
78,432,132

 
78,432,132

 

Issuance of common shares
25,456,784

 

 
78,432,132

Balance, end of period
103,888,916

 
78,432,132

 
78,432,132

Common shares
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
$
7,843

 
$
7,843

 
$

Issuance of common shares
2,546

 

 
7,843

Balance, end of period
10,389

 
7,843

 
7,843

Additional paid-in capital
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
762,430

 
756,219

 

Issuance of common shares, net
283,460

 
(197
)
 
756,219

Fair value of Founder and advisor warrants
3,747

 

 
13,627

Fair value of warrants qualifying as shareholders' equity
(3,747
)
 

 
(13,627
)
Share compensation expense
9,800

 
6,408

 

Balance, end of period
1,055,690

 
762,430

 
756,219

Subscriptions receivable
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of period

 
(177,507
)
 

Subscriptions due from shareholders

 

 
(177,507
)
Receipt of subscriptions due from shareholders

 
177,507

 

Balance, end of period

 

 
(177,507
)
Retained earnings (deficit)
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
98,271

 
(1,130
)
 

Net income (loss)
227,311

 
99,401

 
(1,130
)
Balance, end of period
325,582

 
98,271

 
(1,130
)
Shareholders' equity attributable to shareholders
1,391,661

 
868,544

 
585,425

Non-controlling interests
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
59,777

 

 

Contributions
88,320

 
58,561

 

Distributions
(35,129
)
 

 

Income attributable to non-controlling interests
5,767

 
1,216

 

Balance, end of period
118,735

 
59,777

 

Total shareholders' equity
$
1,510,396

 
$
928,321

 
$
585,425

The accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-5


THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the period from October 6, 2011 (incorporation date)
to December 31, 2011
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share amounts)
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Operating activities
 
 
 
 
 
 Net income (loss)
$
227,311

 
$
99,401

 
$
(1,130
)
 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
 
 
 
 

 Share compensation expense
9,800

 
6,408

 

 Net unrealized gain on investments and derivatives
(78,950
)
 
(113,421
)
 

 Net realized gain on investments and derivatives
(236,333
)
 
(55,632
)
 

 Amortization of premium and accretion of discount, net
(262
)
 
(2,434
)
 

 Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 

 Reinsurance balances receivable
(107,483
)
 
(84,280
)
 

 Deferred acquisition costs, net
(45,810
)
 
(45,383
)
 

 Loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable
(9,277
)
 

 

 Other assets
(275
)
 
(1,701
)
 
(1,420
)
 Interest and dividends receivable, net
(1,034
)
 
(833
)
 

 Unearned premium reserves
171,294

 
93,893

 

 Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
67,060

 
67,271

 

 Accounts payable and accrued expenses
4,089

 
4,157

 
995

 Reinsurance balances payable
9,081

 

 

 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
9,211

 
(32,554
)
 
(1,555
)
 Investing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 Purchases of investments
(2,172,077
)
 
(2,317,234
)
 

 Proceeds from sales of investments
1,943,655

 
1,521,110

 

 Purchases of investments to cover short sales
(407,965
)
 
(535,443
)
 

 Proceeds from short sales of investments
290,770

 
729,182

 

 Change in due to/from brokers, net
12,162

 
(65,678
)
 

 Increase (decrease) in securities purchased under an agreement to sell
22,261

 
(60,408
)
 

 Non-controlling interest in investment affiliate
29,588

 
40,129

 

 Change in restricted cash and cash equivalents
(115,950
)
 
(77,627
)
 

 Net cash used in investing activities
(397,556
)
 
(765,969
)
 

 Financing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net of costs
286,095

 
158,593

 
605,396

 Increase in deposit liabilities
70,500

 
50,446

 

 Non-controlling interest in Catastrophe Fund
29,608

 
19,646

 

 Non-controlling interest in Catastrophe Fund Manager
(238
)
 
2

 

 Net cash provided by financing activities
385,965

 
228,687

 
605,396

 Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(2,380
)
 
(569,836
)
 
603,841

 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
34,005

 
603,841

 

 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
31,625

 
$
34,005

 
$
603,841

 Supplementary information
 
 
 
 
 
 Interest paid in cash
$
4,221

 
$
1,823

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 The accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are
 an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-6


Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Expressed in United States Dollars)
1.
Organization
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. (the “Company”) was incorporated as an exempted company under the laws of Bermuda on October 6, 2011 and, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Third Point Reinsurance Company Ltd. (“Third Point Re”), is a provider of global specialty property and casualty reinsurance products. Third Point Re was incorporated in Bermuda and is registered as a Class 4 insurer under the Insurance Act 1978, as amended, and related regulations (the “Act”). Third Point Re commenced reinsurance operations in January 2012.
On June 15, 2012, Third Point Reinsurance Opportunities Fund Ltd. (the “Catastrophe Fund”), Third Point Reinsurance Investment Management Ltd. (the “Catastrophe Fund Manager”), and Third Point Re Cat Ltd. (the “Catastrophe Reinsurer”) were incorporated in Bermuda. The Company subsequently announced a strategic arrangement with Hiscox Insurance Company (Bermuda) Limited (“Hiscox”) to launch a collateralized catastrophe reinsurance underwriting fund management business. The Catastrophe Fund Manager, a Bermuda exempted company, is the investment manager of the Catastrophe Fund and is 85% owned by Third Point Re and 15% owned by Hiscox. The Catastrophe Fund Manager is responsible for the investment and management of the Catastrophe Fund’s assets. The Catastrophe Fund is an exempted company incorporated in Bermuda and is open to both related party and third party investors. The Catastrophe Fund Manager also acts as manager of the Catastrophe Reinsurer and, in this capacity, is responsible for overseeing the underwriting and investment activities of the Catastrophe Reinsurer. The Catastrophe Reinsurer is a Bermuda exempted company and is licensed as a special purpose insurer under the Act.
On August 2, 2012, the Company established a wholly-owned subsidiary in the United Kingdom, Third Point Re Marketing (UK) Limited. (“TPRUK”). On May 20, 2013, TPRUK was licensed as an insurance intermediary by the UK Financial Conduct Authority.
On August 20, 2013, the Company completed an initial public offering (“IPO”) of 24,832,484 common shares at an offering price of $12.50 per share. The net proceeds of the offering were $286.0 million , after deducting offering costs. The Company's common shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TPRE”.
These consolidated financial statements include the results of the Company and its wholly and majority owned subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
2.
Significant accounting policies
The following is a summary of the significant accounting and reporting policies adopted by the Company:
Use of estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported and disclosed amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The major estimates reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, the loss and loss adjustment expense reserves, estimates of written and earned premiums and fair value of financial instruments.
Cash and restricted cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash held in banks and other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturity dates of ninety days or less.

F-7



Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist of cash held in trust accounts with the Catastrophe Reinsurer, securing collateralized reinsurance contracts written and cash held with brokers securing letters of credit issued under credit facilities.
Premium revenue recognition
The Company estimates the ultimate premiums for the entire contract period and records this estimate at the inception of the contract, to the extent that the amount of written premium is estimable. For contracts where the full written premium is not estimable at inception, the Company records written premium for the portion of the contract period for which the amount is estimable. These estimates are based primarily on information in the underlying contracts as well as information provided by clients and/or brokers.
Premiums written are earned over the exposure period in proportion to the period of risk covered. Unearned premiums represent the portion of premiums written that relate to the remaining term of the underlying policies in force.
Premiums for retroactive reinsurance contracts, where the Company has evaluated and concluded that risk transfer has occured, are earned at the inception of the contract, as all of the underlying loss events covered by these contracts occurred in the past. Any underwriting profit at inception of a retroactive reinsurance contract is deferred and recognised over the estimated future payout of the loss and loss adjustment expenses reserves. Any underwriting loss at inception of a retroactive reinsurance contract is recognised immediately.
Changes in premium estimates are expected and may result in adjustments in any reporting period. These estimates change over time as additional information regarding the underlying business volume is obtained. Any subsequent adjustments arising on such estimates are recorded in the period in which they are determined.
Reinsurance premiums ceded
The Company reduces the risk of losses on business written by reinsuring certain risks and exposures with other reinsurers. The Company remains liable to the extent that any retrocessionaire fails to meet its obligations and to the extent that the Company does not hold sufficient security for their unpaid obligations. Ceded premiums are written during the period in which the risks incept and are expensed over the contract period in proportion to the period of risk covered. Unearned premiums ceded consist of the unexpired portion of reinsurance ceded.
Deferred acquisition costs
Acquisition costs consist of commissions, brokerage and excise taxes that are related directly to the successful acquisition of new or renewal reinsurance contracts. These costs are deferred and amortized over the period in which the related premiums are earned. The Company evaluates the recoverability of deferred acquisition costs by determining if the sum of future earned premiums and anticipated investment income is greater than expected future loss and loss adjustment expenses and acquisition costs. If a loss is probable on the unexpired portion of contracts in force, a premium deficiency loss is recognized. As of December 31, 2013 , deferred acquisition costs are considered to be fully recoverable and no premium deficiency has been recorded.
Acquisition costs also include profit commissions that are expensed when incurred. Profit commissions are calculated and accrued based on the expected loss experience for contracts and recorded when the current loss estimate indicates that a profit commission is probable under the contract terms.
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
The Company’s loss and loss adjustment expense reserves include case reserves and reserves for losses incurred but not yet reported (“IBNR reserves”). Case reserves are established for losses that have been reported, but not yet paid, based on loss reports from brokers and ceding companies. IBNR reserves represent the estimated loss and loss adjustment expenses that have been incurred by insureds and reinsureds but not yet reported to the insurer or reinsurer, including unknown future developments on loss and loss adjustment expenses which are known to the insurer or reinsurer. IBNR

F-8



reserves are established by management based on actuarially determined estimates of ultimate loss and loss adjustment expenses.
Inherent in the estimate of ultimate loss and loss adjustment expenses are expected trends in claim severity and frequency and other factors that may vary significantly as claims are settled. Accordingly, ultimate loss and loss adjustment expenses may differ materially from the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements. These estimates are reviewed regularly and, as experience develops and new information becomes known, the reserves are adjusted as necessary. Such adjustments, if any, are recorded in the consolidated statements of income (loss) in the period in which they become known.
Deposit liabilities
Certain contracts do not transfer sufficient insurance risk and are accounted for using the deposit method of accounting. Management exercises judgment in determining whether contracts contain sufficient risk to be accounted for as reinsurance contracts. Using the deposit method of accounting, a deposit liability, rather than written premium, is initially recorded based upon the consideration received less any explicitly identified premiums or fees. In subsequent periods, the deposit liability is adjusted by calculating the effective yield on the deposit to reflect actual payments to date and future expected payments.
Fair value measurement
The Company determines the fair value of financial instruments in accordance with current accounting guidance, which defines fair value and establishes a three level fair value hierarchy based upon the transparency of inputs used in the valuation of an asset or liability. Fair value is defined as the price that the Company would receive to sell an asset or would pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company determines the estimated fair value of each individual security utilizing the highest level inputs available.
The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities, which qualify as financial instruments, approximates the carrying amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheets.
Investments
The Company’s investments are classified as “trading securities” and are carried at fair value with changes in fair value included in earnings in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
The fair value of the Company’s investments are based on quoted market prices, or when such prices are not available, by reference to broker or underwriter bid indications and/or internal pricing valuation techniques. Investment transactions are recorded on a trade date basis with balances pending settlement included in due to/from brokers in the consolidated balance sheets.
Realized gains and losses are determined using cost calculated on a specific identification basis. Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and expense are recorded on the accrual basis including interest and premiums amortized and discounts accreted.
Derivatives
Underwriting
The Catastrophe Reinsurer enters into certain contracts under which the potential loss payments are triggered exclusively by reference to a specified index, such as an industry loss. These contracts are considered derivatives. The Company records the fair value of these contracts in derivative liabilities, at fair value, in the consolidated balance sheet. Changes in the fair value of these contracts are recorded in net investment income in the consolidated statement of income.



F-9



Investments
Derivative instruments within our investment assets managed by our investment manager Third Point LLC, are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with changes in fair values and realized gains and losses recognised in net investment income in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Derivatives serve as a key component of the Company’s investment strategy and are utilized primarily to structure the portfolio, or individual investments, and to economically match the investment objectives of the Company. The Company's derivatives do not qualify as hedges for financial reporting purposes and are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets on a gross basis and not offset against any collateral pledged or received. Pursuant to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association ("ISDA") master agreements, securities lending agreements and other derivatives agreements, the Company and its counterparties typically have the ability to net certain payments owed to each other in specified circumstances. In addition, in the event a party to one of the ISDA master agreements, securities lending agreements or other derivatives agreements defaults, or a transaction is otherwise subject to termination, the non-defaulting party generally has the right to set off against payments owed to the defaulting party or collateral held by the non defaulting party.
The Company enters into derivative contracts to manage credit risk, interest rate risk, currency exchange risk, and other exposure risks. The Company uses derivatives in connection with its risk-management activities to economically hedge certain risks and to gain exposure to certain investments. The utilization of derivative contracts also allows for an efficient means by which to trade certain asset classes.
Fair values of derivatives are determined by using quoted market prices and counterparty quotes when available; otherwise fair values are based on pricing models that consider the time value of money, volatility, and the current market and contractual prices of underlying financial instruments.
Share-based compensation
The Company accounts for its share-based compensation transactions using the fair value of the award at the grant date. Determining the fair value of share purchase options at the grant date requires estimation and judgment. The Company uses an option-pricing model (Black-Scholes) to calculate the fair value of share purchase options.
For share purchase options granted that contain both a service and performance condition, the Company recognizes share compensation expense only for the portion of the options that are considered probable of being exercised. Share compensation for share purchase options considered probable of being exercised is expensed over the service (vesting) period on a graded vesting basis. The probability of share purchase options being exercised is evaluated at each reporting period.  When the share purchase options are considered probable of being exercised, the Company records a catch up of share compensation expense from the grant date (service inception date for existing options) to the current reporting period end based on the fair value of the options at the grant date.
The Company measures grant date fair value for restricted share awards based on the price of its common shares at the grant date and the expense is recognised on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
Warrants
The Company accounts for certain warrant contracts issued to its Founders in conjunction with the initial capitalization of the Company, and which it may settle by using either the physical settlement or net-share settlement methods. The fair value of these warrants was recorded in equity as additional paid-in capital. The fair value of warrants issued are estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
The Company accounts for certain warrant contracts issued to an advisor, where services have been received by the Company, in part, in exchange for equity instruments, based on the fair value of such services. The associated cost of these warrants has been recorded as capital raise costs and is included in additional paid in capital in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity.

F-10



Offering costs
Offering costs incurred in connection with the initial capital raise of the Company and the IPO, which included underwriters’ fees, legal and accounting fees, printing and other fees have been deducted from the gross proceeds of the offering. The proceeds from the issuance of shares net of offering costs is included in additional paid in capital in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity.
Foreign currency transactions
The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded in U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect on the transaction date. Monetary assets and liabilities in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the reporting date and foreign exchange gains and losses are included in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Income taxes and uncertain tax positions
Under current Bermuda law, the Company and its Bermuda subsidiaries are not subject to any income or capital gains taxes. In the event that such taxes are imposed, the Company and its Bermuda subsidiaries would be exempted from any such taxes until March 2035 pursuant to the Tax Assurance Certificates issued to such entities pursuant to the Bermuda Exempted Undertakings Tax Protection Act of 1966, as amended.
As of December 31, 2013 , the Company did not have any uncertain tax positions.
Non-controlling interests
The Company consolidates the results of entities in which it has a controlling financial interest. The Company records the portion of shareholders’ equity attributable to non-controlling interests as a separate line within shareholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company records the portion of income attributable to non-controlling interests as a separate line within the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares and participating securities outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of common shares excludes any dilutive effect of outstanding warrants, options and convertible securities such as unvested restricted shares. Diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares and share equivalents including any dilutive effects of warrants, options and other awards under share plans and are determined using the treasury stock method. U.S. GAAP requires that unvested share awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, whether paid or unpaid (referred to as ‘‘participating securities”), be included in the number of shares outstanding for both basic and diluted earnings per share calculations. The Company treats its unvested restricted shares as participating securities. In the event of a net loss, the participating securities are excluded from the calculation of both basic and diluted loss per share.
During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company determined that it had incorrectly calculated diluted earnings per share for the prior periods, which resulted in an understatement of diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share was correctly presented for the prior periods. The accompanying consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from October 6, 2011 (incorporation date) to December 31, 2011 correctly present diluted earnings per share and the weighted average number of dilutive shares outstanding. The following tables summarize the correct diluted earnings per share amounts and weighted average number of dilutive shares outstanding amounts for the prior periods.

F-11



 
 
Three months ended
 
 
March 31, 2012
 
June 30, 2012 (1)
 
September 30, 2012
 
December 31, 2012
 
March 31, 2013
 
June 30, 2013
 
September 30, 2013
 
 
(unaudited)
Diluted EPS (as originally reported):
 
$
0.35

 
$
(0.40
)
 
$
0.45

 
$
0.69

 
$
0.85

 
$
0.30

 
$
0.46

Diluted EPS (as corrected):
 
$
0.38

 
$
(0.40
)
 
$
0.50

 
$
0.76

 
$
0.93

 
$
0.33

 
$
0.51

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted Average Number of Dilutive Shares Outstanding (as originally reported):
 
85,335,404

 
78,432,132

 
87,888,983

 
87,866,613

 
87,777,462

 
87,895,953

 
100,176,416

Weighted Average Number of Dilutive Shares Outstanding (as corrected):
 
78,432,132

 
78,432,132

 
78,551,830

 
78,820,844

 
79,083,675

 
79,254,268

 
90,915,805

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six months ended
 
Nine months ended
 
Year ended December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 June 30, 2012 (1)
 
June 30, 2013
 
September 30, 2012
 
September 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(unaudited)
 
(unaudited)
 
(audited)
 
 
 
 
Diluted EPS (as originally reported):
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
1.15

 
$
0.44

 
$
1.59

 
$
1.14

 
 
 
 
Diluted EPS (as corrected):
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
1.26

 
$
0.49

 
$
1.75

 
$
1.26

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted Average Number of Dilutive Shares Outstanding (as originally reported):
 
78,432,132

 
87,836,378

 
87,031,196

 
92,438,629

 
87,253,760

 
 
 
 
Weighted Average Number of Dilutive Shares Outstanding (as corrected):
 
78,432,132

 
79,147,972

 
78,492,979

 
83,453,834

 
78,598,236

 
 
 
 
(1) Prior periods with a net loss correctly presented diluted earnings per share.
Leases
Leases in which substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the lessor) are recognised in the consolidated statements of income (loss) on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
Comprehensive income
The Company has no comprehensive income other than net income disclosed in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Segment information
Under U.S. GAAP, operating segments are based on the internal information that management uses for allocating resources and assessing performance of the Company. The Company reports two operating segments – Property and Casualty Reinsurance and Catastrophe Risk Management. The Company also has a corporate function that includes the Company’s investment results and certain general and administrative expenses related to its corporate activities.

F-12




Recently issued accounting standards
Issued and effective as of December 31, 2013
In January 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-01, Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (ASU 2013-01). The objective of ASU 2013-01 is to address implementation issues about the scope of ASU 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The amendments clarify that the scope of ASU 2011-11 applies to derivatives, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions. Entities with other types of financial assets and financial liabilities subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement also are affected because these amendments make them no longer subject to the disclosure requirements in ASU 2011-11. ASU 2013-01 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company has included the required disclosures in Note 9 of notes to consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (ASU 2013-02). The objective of ASU 2013-02 is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of other comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 is effective for periods subsequent to December 15, 2012. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Issued but not yet effective as of December 31, 2013

In June 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-08, Financial Services - Investment Companies - Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements (ASU 2013-08). The amendments in this update change the assessment of whether an entity is an investment company by developing a new two-tiered approach for that assessment, which requires an entity to possess certain fundamental characteristics while allowing judgment in assessing other typical characteristics. The new approach requires an entity to assess all of the characteristics of an investment company and consider its purpose and design to determine whether it is an investment company. ASU 2013-08 is effective prospectively for periods subsequent to December 15, 2013. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance; however, it is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
3.
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 consisted of the following:
 
December 31,
2013
 
December 31,
2012
 
($ in thousands)
Restricted cash securing collateralized reinsurance contracts written by the Catastrophe Reinsurer
$
93,014

 
$
12,844

Restricted cash securing credit facilities
100,563

 
64,783

 
$
193,577

 
$
77,627


4.
Reinsurance premiums ceded
The Company from time to time purchases retrocessional coverage for one or more of the following reasons: to manage its overall exposure, to reduce its net liability on individual risks, to obtain additional underwriting capacity and to balance its underwriting portfolio. Additionally, retrocession can be used as a mechanism to share the risks and rewards of business written and therefore can be used as a tool to align the Company’s interests with those of its counterparties. The Company currently has coverage that provides for recovery of a portion of loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred on one crop contract. Loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable from the retrocessionaires are recorded as assets. For the year ended December 31, 2013 , loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred and reported

F-13



on the consolidated statements of income (loss) are net of loss and loss expenses recovered of $9.3 million. Retrocession contracts do not relieve the Company from its obligations to the insureds. Failure of retrocessionaires to honor their obligations could result in losses to the Company. As of December 31, 2013 , the Company had loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable of $9.3 million with one retrocessionaire who was rated “A (Excellent)” by A.M. Best Company. The Company regularly evaluates the financial condition of its retrocessionaires to assess the ability of the retrocessionaires to honor their obligations.
5.
Investments
The Company’s investments are managed by its investment manager, Third Point LLC (“Third Point LLC” or the “Investment Manager”), under a long-term investment management contract. The Company directly owns the investments which are held in a separate account and managed by Third Point LLC. The following is a summary of the separate account managed by Third Point LLC:
 
December 31,
2013
 
December 31,
2012
Assets
($ in thousands)
Total investments in securities and commodities
$
1,460,864

 
$
937,690

Cash and cash equivalents
869

 
4

Restricted cash and cash equivalents
100,563

 
64,783

Due from brokers
98,386

 
131,785

Securities purchased under an agreement to sell
38,147

 
60,408

Derivative assets
39,045

 
25,628

Interest and dividends receivable
2,604

 
2,088

Other assets
933

 
829

Total assets
$
1,741,411

 
$
1,223,215

Liabilities and non-controlling interest
 
 
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
1,759

 
$
825

Securities sold, not yet purchased, at fair value
56,056

 
176,454

Due to brokers
44,870

 
66,107

Derivative liabilities
8,819

 
12,992

Interest and dividends payable
748

 
1,255

Non-controlling interest
69,717

 
40,129

Total liabilities and non-controlling interest
181,969

 
297,762

Total net investments managed by Third Point LLC
$
1,559,442

 
$
925,453

The Company’s Investment Manager has a formal valuation policy that sets forth the pricing methodology for investments to be used in determining the fair value of each security in the Company’s portfolio. The valuation policy is updated and approved at least on an annual basis by Third Point LLC’s valuation committee (the “Committee”), which is comprised of officers and employees who are senior business management personnel of Third Point LLC. The Committee meets monthly. The Committee’s role is to review and verify the propriety and consistency of the valuation methodology to determine the fair value of investments. The Committee also reviews any due diligence performed and approves any changes to current or potential external pricing vendors.
The fair values of investments are estimated using prices obtained from either third-party pricing services or dealer quotes. The methodology for valuation is generally determined based on the investment's asset class as per the Company's Investment Manager valuation policy.  For investments that the Company is unable to obtain fair values from a pricing service or broker, fair values are estimated using information obtained from the Company’s Investment Manager.
Securities and commodities listed on a national securities or commodities exchange or quoted on NASDAQ are valued at their last sales price as of the last business day of the period. Listed securities with no reported sales on such date

F-14



and over-the-counter (“OTC”) securities are valued at their last closing bid price if held long by the Company, and last closing ask price if held short by the Company. As of December 31, 2013 , securities valued at $483.2 million ( December 31, 2012 - $248.4 million ), representing 33.1% ( December 31, 2012 26.5% ) of investments in securities and commodities, and $41.0 million ( December 31, 2012 - $68.8 million ), representing 73.1% ( December 31, 2012 39.0% ) of securities sold, not yet purchased, are valued based on dealer quotes or other quoted market prices for similar securities.
Private securities are not registered for public sale and are carried at an estimated fair value at the end of the period, as determined by the Company's Investment Manager. Valuation techniques used by the Company's Investment Manager may include market approach, last transaction analysis, liquidation analysis and/or using discounted cash flow models where the significant inputs could include but are not limited to additional rounds of equity financing, financial metrics such as revenue multiples or price-earnings ratio, discount rates and other factors. In addition, the Company or the Company’s Investment Manager may employ third party valuation firms to conduct separate valuations of such private securities. The third party valuation firms provide the Company or the Company’s Investment Manager with a written report documenting their recommended valuation as of the determination date for the specified investments.
As of December 31, 2013 , the Company had $3.3 million ( December 31, 2012 - $2.8 million ) of private securities fair valued by a third party valuation firm using information obtained from the Company's Investment Manager. Private securities represented less than 1% of total investments in securities. The actual value at which these securities could actually be sold or settled with a willing buyer or seller may differ from the Company’s estimated fair values depending on a number of factors including, but not limited to, current and future economic conditions, the quantity sold or settled, the presence of an active market and the availability of a willing buyer or seller.
The Company’s derivatives are recorded at fair value, and are included in the consolidated balance sheet in derivative assets and derivative liabilities. The Company values exchange-traded derivatives at their last sales price on the exchange where it is primarily traded. OTC derivatives, which include swap, option, swaption, forward, future and contract for differences, are valued by third party sources when available; otherwise, fair values are obtained from counterparty quotes that are based on pricing models that consider the time value of money, volatility, and the current market and contractual prices of the underlying financial instruments.
As an extension of its underwriting activities, the Catastrophe Reinsurer has sold derivative instruments that provide reinsurance-like protection to third parties for specific loss events associated with certain lines of business.  These derivatives are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with the offset recorded in net investment income in the consolidated statements of income (loss).  These contracts are valued on the basis of models developed by the Company, which approximates fair value.
The Company’s holdings in asset-backed securities (“ABS”) are substantially invested in residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”). The balance of the ABS positions was held in commercial mortgage-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations and student loan asset-backed securities. These investments are valued using dealer quotes or a recognised third-party pricing vendor. All of these classes of ABS are sensitive to changes in interest rates and any resulting change in the rate at which borrowers sell their properties, refinance, or otherwise pre-pay their loans. Investors in these classes of ABS may be exposed to the credit risk of underlying borrowers not being able to make timely payments on loans or the likelihood of borrowers defaulting on their loans. In addition, investors may be exposed to significant market and liquidity risks.
The Company values its investments in limited partnerships at fair value, which is estimated based on the Company's share of the net asset value of the limited partnerships as provided by the investment managers of the underlying investment funds. The resulting net gains or net losses are reflected in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
The Company performs several processes to ascertain the reasonableness of the valuation of all of the Company’s investments comprising the Company’s investment portfolio, including securities that are categorized as Level 2 and Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. These processes include i) obtaining and reviewing weekly and monthly investment portfolio reports from the Investment Manager, ii) obtaining and reviewing monthly Net Asset Value ("NAV") and investment return reports received directly from the Company’s third-party fund administrator which are compared to the reports noted in (i), and iii) monthly update discussions with the Company’s Investment Manager regarding the

F-15



investment portfolio, including, their process for reviewing and validating pricing obtained from outside service providers.
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 , there were no changes in the valuation techniques as it relates to the above.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the closing rates of exchange. Transactions during the period are translated at the rate of exchange prevailing on the date of the transaction. The Company does not isolate that portion of the net investment income resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments, dividends and interest from the fluctuations arising from changes in fair values of securities and derivatives held. Periodic payments received or paid on swap agreements are recorded as realized gain or loss on investment transactions. Such fluctuations are included within net investment income in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
U.S. GAAP disclosure requirements establish a framework for measuring fair value, including a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability. The three-level hierarchy of inputs is summarized below:
Level 1 – Quoted prices available in active markets/exchanges for identical investments as of the reporting date.
Level 2 – Observable inputs to the valuation methodology other than unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs include, but are not limited to, prices quoted for similar assets or liabilities in active markets/ exchanges, prices quoted for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and fair values determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies.
Level 3 – Pricing inputs unobservable for the investment and include activities where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. The inputs applied in the determination of fair value require significant management judgment and estimation.
Observable inputs are inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources other than those of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment.
The key inputs for corporate, government and sovereign bond valuation are coupon frequency, coupon rate and underlying bond spread. The key inputs for asset-backed securities are yield, probability of default, loss severity and prepayment.
Key inputs for over-the-counter (“OTC”) valuations vary based on the type of underlying security on which the contract was written:
The key inputs for most OTC option contracts include notional, strike price, maturity, payout structure, current foreign exchange forward and spot rates, current market price of underlying and volatility of underlying.
The key inputs for most forward contracts include notional, maturity, forward rate, spot rate, various interest rate curves and discount factor.
The key inputs for swap valuation will vary based on the type of underlying on which the contract was written. Generally, the key inputs for most swap contracts include notional, swap period, fixed rate, credit or interest rate curves, current market or spot price of the underlying and the volatility of the underlying.




F-16



The following tables present the Company’s investments, categorized by the level of the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
 
December 31, 2013
 
 Quoted prices in active markets
 
 Significant other observable inputs
 
 Significant unobservable inputs
 
 Total
 
 (Level 1)
 
 (Level 2)
 
 (Level 3)
 
Assets
 ($ in thousands)
Equity securities
$
839,903

 
$
17,914

 
$

 
$
857,817

Private common equity securities

 
94,282

 
2,012

 
96,294

Total equities
839,903

 
112,196

 
2,012

 
954,111

Asset-backed securities

 
325,133

 
400

 
325,533

Bank debts

 
8,017

 

 
8,017

Corporate bonds

 
82,139

 
4,610

 
86,749

Municipal bonds

 
10,486

 

 
10,486

Sovereign debt

 
10,639

 

 
10,639

Total debt securities

 
436,414

 
5,010

 
441,424

Investments in limited partnerships

 
29,286

 
5,292

 
34,578

Options
6,284

 
6,785

 

 
13,069

Rights and warrants
1

 

 

 
1

Trade claims

 
17,681

 

 
17,681

Total other investments
6,285

 
53,752

 
5,292

 
65,329

Derivative assets
321

 
38,724

 

 
39,045

Total assets
$
846,509

 
$
641,086

 
$
12,314

 
$
1,499,909

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity securities
$
5,207

 
$

 
$

 
$
5,207

Sovereign debt

 
37,592

 

 
37,592

Corporate bonds

 
3,372

 

 
3,372

Options
4,714

 
5,171

 

 
9,885

Total securities sold, not yet purchased
9,921

 
46,135

 

 
56,056

Derivative liabilities
441

 
8,378

 

 
8,819

Total liabilities
$
10,362

 
$
54,513

 
$

 
$
64,875



F-17



 
 December 31, 2012
 
 Quoted prices in active markets
 
 Significant other observable inputs
 
 Significant unobservable inputs
 
 Total
 
 (Level 1)
 
 (Level 2)
 
 (Level 3)
 
Assets
 ($ in thousands)
Equity securities
$
496,473

 
$
1,699

 

 
$
498,172

Private common equity securities

 

 
2,757

 
2,757

Total equities
496,473

 
1,699

 
2,757

 
500,929

Asset-backed securities

 
191,401

 

 
191,401

Bank debts

 
22,531

 
54

 
22,585

Corporate bonds

 
56,814

 
1,046

 
57,860

Sovereign debt

 
7,485

 

 
7,485

Total debt securities

 
278,231

 
1,100

 
279,331

Investments in limited partnerships

 
91,287

 

 
91,287

Commodities
51,093

 

 

 
51,093

Options
3,191

 
276

 

 
3,467

Trade claims

 
11,583

 

 
11,583

Total other investments
54,284

 
103,146

 

 
157,430

Derivative assets
1,025

 
24,603

 

 
25,628

Total assets
$
551,782

 
$
407,679

 
$
3,857

 
$
963,318

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity securities
$
104,308

 

 

 
$
104,308

Sovereign debt

 
59,918

 

 
59,918

Corporate bonds

 
8,924

 

 
8,924

Options
3,259

 
45

 

 
3,304

Total securities sold, not yet purchased
107,567

 
68,887

 

 
176,454

Derivative liabilities
10

 
12,982

 

 
12,992

Total liabilities
$
107,577

 
$
81,869

 
$

 
$
189,446


During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 , the Company made no significant reclassifications of assets or liabilities between Levels 1 and 2.












F-18





The following table presents the reconciliation for all investments measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 :
 
January 1,
2013
 
Transfers in to (out of) Level 3
 
Purchases
 
Sales
 
Realized and Unrealized Gains(Losses) (1)
 
December 31,
2013
 
($ in thousands)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset-backed securities
$

 
$
133

 
$
552

 
$
(12
)
 
$
(273
)
 
$
400

Bank debt
54

 
(54
)
 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds
1,046

 

 
4,094

 
(1,392
)
 
862

 
4,610

Private common equity securities
2,757

 
(2,757
)
 
2,031

 

 
(19
)
 
2,012

Investments in limited partnerships

 

 
4,690

 
(342
)
 
944

 
5,292

 
$
3,857

 
$
(2,678
)
 
$
11,367

 
$
(1,746
)
 
$
1,514

 
$
12,314

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative liabilities
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(4,335
)
 
$
4,335

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
January 1,
2012
 
Transfers in to (out of) Level 3
 
Purchases
 
Sales
 
Realized and Unrealized Gains(Losses) (1)
 
December 31,
2012
 
($ in thousands)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate bonds
$

 
$
1,093

 
$

 
$
(488
)
 
$
441

 
$
1,046

Bank debt

 
109

 

 
(8
)
 
(47
)
 
54

Private common equity securities

 
5,450

 

 
(2,401
)
 
(292
)
 
2,757

Trade claims

 
20

 

 
(22
)
 
2

 

Total assets
$

 
$
6,672

 
$

 
$
(2,919
)
 
$
104

 
$
3,857


(1) Total change in realized and unrealized gain (loss) recorded on Level 3 financial instruments are included in net investment income in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Total unrealized gains related to fair value assets using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $1.0 million ( December 31, 2012 - $(0.7) million ).
For assets and liabilities that were transferred into Level 3 during the period, gains (losses) are presented as if the assets or liabilities had been transferred into Level 3 at the beginning of the period; similarly, for assets and liabilities that were transferred out of Level 3 during the year, gains (losses) are presented as if the assets or liabilities had been transferred out of Level 3 at the beginning of the year. The Company held no Level 3 investments where quantitative unobservable inputs are produced by the Company itself when measuring fair value.
6. Securities purchased under an agreement to sell
The Company may enter into repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements with financial institutions in which the financial institution agrees to resell or repurchase and the Company agrees to repurchase or resell such securities at a mutually agreed price upon maturity. As of December 31, 2013 , the Company held outstanding reverse repurchase agreements valued at $38.1 million ( December 31, 2012 - $60.4 million ). As of December 31, 2013 , the total value of

F-19



securities received as collateral by the Company was $37.6 million ( December 31, 2012 - $60.0 million ). As the Company held only reverse repu rcha se agreements as of December 31, 2013, these positions are not impacted by master netting agreements. Interest expense and income related to these transactions are included in interest payable and receivable in the consolidated balance sheets. For the year ended December 31, 2013 , foreign currency gains of $1.9 million ( 2012 – gains of $0.6 million) on reverse repurchase agreements are included in net investment income in the consolidated statements of income (loss). Generally, reverse repurchase agreements mature within 30 to 90 days .
7.
Securities sold, not yet purchased, at fair value
Securities sold, not yet purchased are securities that the Company has sold, but does not own, in anticipation of a decline in the fair value of the security. The Company’s risk is that the value of the security will increase rather than decline. Consequently, the settlement amount of the liability for securities sold, not yet purchased may exceed the amount recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as the Company is obligated to purchase the securities sold, not yet purchased in the market at prevailing prices to settle its obligations. To sell a security sold, not yet purchased, the Company needs to borrow the security for delivery to the buyer. On each day that the transaction is open, the liability for the obligation to replace the borrowed security is marked-to-market and an unrealized gain or loss is recorded. At the time that the transaction is closed, the Company realizes a gain or loss equal to the difference between the price at which the security was sold and the cost of replacing the borrowed security. While the transaction is open, the Company will also incur an expense for any dividends or interest that will be paid to the lender of the securities.
8.
Due from/to brokers
The Company holds substantially all of its investments through its prime brokers pursuant to various agreements between Third Point LLC and each prime broker. The brokerage arrangements differ from broker to broker, but generally cash and investments in securities balances are available as collateral against investment in securities sold, not yet purchased and derivative positions, if required.
Margin debt balances are collateralized by cash held by the prime brokers and certain of the Company’s securities. Margin interest was paid either at the daily broker call rate or based on LIBOR.
Due from/to brokers include cash balances maintained with the Company’s prime brokers, receivables and payables from unsettled trades and proceeds from securities sold, not yet purchased. In addition, due from and to brokers includes cash collateral received and posted from OTC and repurchase agreement counterparties. As of December 31, 2013 , the Company’s due from/to brokers includes a total non-U.S. currency payable balance of $ 268.5 million ( December 31, 2012 - $90.8 million ).
                                      









F-20




9.
Derivatives
The following tables identify the listing currency, fair value and notional amounts of derivative instruments included in the consolidated balance sheets, categorized by primary underlying risk. Balances are presented on a gross basis.
 
As of December 31, 2013
 
 Listing currency (1)
 
 Fair Value
 
 Notional Amounts (2)
Derivative Assets by Primary Underlying Risk
 ($ in thousands)
Commodity Price
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Future Options - Purchased
USD
 
$
256

 
$
12,325

Credit
 
 
 
 
 
Credit Default Swaps - Protection Purchased
USD
 
15,397

 
109,520

Credit Default Swaps - Protection Sold
USD
 
1,157

 
9,557

Equity Price
 
 
 
 
 
Contracts for Differences - Long Contracts
CHF/EUR/GBP/USD
 
10,549

 
62,847

Contracts for Differences - Short Contracts
NOK
 
67

 
2,758

Total Return Swaps - Long Contracts
BRL/JPY/USD
 
2,950

 
68,044

Total Return Swaps - Short Contracts
USD
 
3

 
290

Interest Rates
 
 
 
 
 
Bond Futures - Short Contracts
JPY
 
212

 
40,847

Interest Rate Swaps
EUR
 
182

 
212,594

Interest Rate Swaptions
EUR/JPY/USD
 
1,269

 
54,884

Treasury Futures - Short Contracts
USD
 
108

 
6,544

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign Currency Forward
AUD/CAD/JPY/TRY
 
1,332

 
59,925

Foreign Currency Options - Purchased
USD
 
5,563

 
240,062

Total Derivative Assets
 
 
$
39,045

 
$
880,197

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Listing currency (1)
 
 Fair Value
 
 Notional Amounts (2)
Derivative Liabilities by Primary Underlying Risk
 ($ in thousands)
Commodity Price
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Future Options - Sold
 USD
 
$
148

 
$
35,484

Credit
 
 
 
 
 
Credit Default Swaps - Protection Purchased
 EUR/USD
 
2,634

 
59,446

Credit Default Swaps - Protection Sold
 USD
 
348

 
875

Equity Price
 
 
 
 
 
Contracts for Differences - Long Contracts
 EUR
 
66

 
14,607

Contracts for Differences - Short Contracts
 DKK
 
425

 
7,253

Total Return Swaps - Long Contracts
 BRL/JPY/USD
 
1,385

 
24,807

Total Return Swaps - Short Contracts
 USD
 
140

 
5,037

Index
 
 
 
 
 
Index Futures - Short Contracts
 USD
 
441

 
8,888

Interest Rates
 
 
 
 
 
Bond Futures - Short Contracts
 
 
 
 

Interest Rate Swaps
 EUR/USD
 
821

 
465,560

Interest Rate Swaptions
 USD/JPY
 
174

 
99,587

Treasury Futures - Short Contracts
 USD
 
 
 
 
Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign Currency Forward
EUR/GBP
 
709

 
189,030

Foreign Currency Options - Sold
USD
 
1,528

 
178,476

Total Derivative Liabilities
 
 
$
8,819

 
$
1,089,050

(1) USD = US dollar, JPY = Japanese yen, EUR = Euro, GBP = British pound, BRL = Brazilian real, NOK = Norwegian krone, AUD = Australian dollar, DKK = Danish krone, CAD = Canadian dollar, CHF = Swiss franc, TRY = Turkish lira
(2) The absolute notional exposure represents the Company's derivative activity as of December 31, 2013 , which is representative of the volume of derivatives held during the period.

F-21



 
As of December 31, 2012
 
 Listing currency (1)
 
 Fair Value
 
 Notional Amounts (2)
Derivative Assets by Primary Underlying Risk
 ($ in thousands)
Commodity Price
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Future - Short Contracts
USD
 
$
212

 
$
5,363

Credit
 
 
 
 
 
Credit Default Swaps - Protection Purchased
JPY/USD
 
14,176

 
69,059

Equity Price
 
 
 
 
 
Contracts for Differences - Long Contracts
EUR/GBP/USD
 
4,913

 
40,454

Total Return Swaps - Long Contracts
BRL/USD
 
246

 
13,710

Total Return Swaps - Short Contracts
HKD
 
(65
)
 
179

Interest Rates
 
 
 
 
 
Bond Futures - Short Contracts
JPY
 
248

 
43,108

Interest Rate Swaps
EUR
 
156

 
6,569

Interest Rate Swaptions
EUR/JPY/USD
 
584

 
584

Treasury Futures - Short Contracts
USD
 
564

 
64,819

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign Currency Forward
CAD/JPY/USD
 
2,090

 
57,549

Foreign Currency Options - Purchased
EUR/USD
 
2,504

 
2,504

Total Derivative Assets
 
 
$
25,628

 
$
303,898

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Listing currency (1)
 
 Fair Value
 
 Notional Amounts (2)
Derivative Liabilities by Primary Underlying Risk
 ($ in thousands)
Commodity Price
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Future Options - Purchased
 USD
 
$
10

 
$
17

Credit
 
 
 
 
 
Credit Default Swaps - Protection Purchased
 EUR/JPY/USD
 
10,458

 
37,567

Credit Default Swaps - Protection Sold
USD
 
212

 
438

Equity Price
 
 
 
 
 
Contracts for Differences - Long Contracts
 EUR/GBP/USD
 
710

 
9,016

Contracts for Differences - Short Contracts
EUR
 
29

 
1,513

Total Return Swaps - Long Contracts
 BRL/JPY/USD
 
467

 
24,499

Total Return Swaps - Short Contracts
 HKD/USD
 
38

 
1,014

Interest Rates
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Rate Swaps
JPY/USD
 
539

 
478,730

Interest Rate Swaptions
USD
 

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign Currency Forward
 EUR/GBP/USD
 
211

 
41,334

Foreign Currency Options - Sold
USD
 
318

 
318

Total Derivative Liabilities
 
 
$
12,992

 
$
594,446

(1) USD = US dollar, JPY = Japanese yen, EUR = Euro, GBP = British pound, BRL = Brazilian real, HKD = Hong Kong dollar, NOK = Norwegian krone, AUD = Australian dollar, DKK = Danish krone, CAD = Canadian dollar, CHF = Swiss Franc
(2) The absolute notional exposure represents the Company's derivative activity as of December 31, 2012 , which is representative of the volume of derivatives held during the period.








F-22



The following table sets forth, by major risk type, the Company’s realized and unrealized gains (losses) relating to derivative trading activities for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 . These realized and unrealized gains (losses) are included in net investment income in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
 
December 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Primary Underlying Risk
Realized Gain (Loss)
 
Unrealized Gain (Loss)*
 
Realized Gain (Loss)
 
Unrealized Gain (Loss)*
Commodity Price
($ in thousands)
Commodities Futures - Long Contracts
$

 
$

 
$
1,710

 
$

Commodities Futures - Short Contracts
437

 
(212
)
 
127

 
212

Commodity Future Options - Purchased
264

 
15

 
(17
)
 
(10
)
Commodity Future Options - Sold
(81
)
 
168

 

 

Credit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Credit Default Swaps - Protection Purchased
4,243

 
(10,943
)
 
1,239

 
265

Credit Default Swaps - Protection Sold
(4,845
)
 
10,690

 

 
(212
)
Equity Price
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contracts for Differences - Long Contracts
8,900

 
6,172

 
288

 
4,203

Contracts for Differences - Short Contracts
1,219

 
(341
)
 
931

 
(29
)
Total Return Swaps - Long Contracts
1,026

 
1,786

 
(4,666
)
 
(221
)
Total Return Swaps - Short Contracts
(557
)
 
76

 
2,569

 
(103
)
Index
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Index Futures - Long Contracts
(2,413
)
 

 

 

Index Futures - Short Contracts
1,169

 
(441
)
 
(314
)
 

Interest Rates
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bond Futures - Short Contracts
(289
)
 
(36
)
 

 
248

Interest Rate Swaps
949

 
(255
)
 
312

 
(383
)
Interest Rate Swaptions
(170
)
 
913

 
665

 
5

Sovereign Debt Futures - Short Contracts

 

 
(970
)
 

Treasury Futures - Long Contracts
(119
)
 

 

 

Treasury Futures - Short Contracts
830

 
(456
)
 
(1,233
)
 
564

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign Currency Forward
5,385

 
(1,255
)
 
(1,270
)
 
1,879

Foreign Currency Options

 

 
38

 

Foreign Currency Options - Purchased
5,920

 
1,069

 
(145
)
 
198

Foreign Currency Options - Sold
(3,787
)
 
(109
)
 

 
(87
)
Catastrophe Risk Derivatives
1,250

 
3,085

 

 

 
$
19,331

 
$
9,926

 
$
(736
)
 
$
6,529

*Unrealized gain (loss) relates to derivatives still held at reporting date.
The Company’s ISDA agreements with its counterparties provide for various termination events including decline in NAV of the Company’s investments over a certain period, key-man provisions, document delivery schedules, and Employment Retirement Income Security Act and bankruptcy provisions. Upon the triggering of a termination event, a counterparty may avail itself of various remedies including, but not limited to, waiver of the termination event, request for additional collateral, renegotiation of the ISDA agreement, or immediate settlement of positions.
The Company obtains/provides collateral from/to various counterparties for OTC derivative contracts in accordance with bilateral collateral agreements. As of December 31, 2013 , the Company posted collateral in the form of cash of $35.4 million ( December 31, 2012 - $28.0 million ) to certain counterparties to cover collateral requirements for open OTC derivatives.


F-23



The Company does not offset its derivative instruments and presents all amounts in the consolidated balance sheets on a gross basis. The Company has pledged cash collateral to counterparties to support the current value of amounts due to the counterparties based on the value of the underlying security. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the gross and net amounts of derivative instruments that are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements were as follows:
 
 
Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, 2013 Counterparty
 
Gross Amounts of Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
Financial Instruments
 
Cash Collateral Received
 
Net Amount
 
 
($ in thousands)
Counterparty 1
 
$
1,128

 
$
1,041

 
$

 
$
87

Counterparty 2
 
4,998

 
400

 
1,629

 
2,969

Counterparty 3
 
16,066

 
3,509

 

 
12,557

Counterparty 4
 
1,351

 
1,351

 

 

Counterparty 5
 
3,198

 
1,054

 

 
2,144

Counterparty 6
 
12,234

 
492

 
10,465

 
1,277

Counterparty 7
 
2

 
2

 

 

Counterparty 8
 

 

 

 

Counterparty 9
 
68

 
68

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
39,045

 
$
7,917

 
$
12,094

 
$
19,034

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, 2013 Counterparty
 
Gross Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
Financial Instruments
 
Cash Collateral Pledged
 
Net Amount
 
 
($ in thousands)
Counterparty 1
 
$
1,041

 
$
1,041

 
$

 
$

Counterparty 2
 
400

 
400

 

 

Counterparty 3
 
3,509

 
3,509

 

 

Counterparty 4
 
1,360

 
1,351

 
9

 

Counterparty 5
 
1,054

 
1,054

 

 

Counterparty 6
 
492

 
492

 

 

Counterparty 7
 
59

 
2

 
57

 

Counterparty 8
 

 

 

 

Counterparty 9
 
904

 
68

 
836

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
8,819

 
$
7,917

 
$
902

 
$


F-24



 
 
Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, 2012
Counterparty
 
Gross Amounts of Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
Financial Instruments
 
Cash Collateral Received
 
Net Amount
 
 
($ in thousands)
Counterparty 1
 
$
1,381

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,381

Counterparty 2
 
4,987

 
1,761

 

 
3,226

Counterparty 3
 
6,390

 
4,850

 

 
1,540

Counterparty 4
 
124

 
124

 

 

Counterparty 5
 
526

 
526

 

 

Counterparty 6
 
11,607

 
1,080

 

 
10,527

Counterparty 7
 
231

 
231

 

 

Counterparty 8
 
232

 
16

 

 
216

Counterparty 9
 

 

 

 

Counterparty 10
 
142

 

 

 
142

Counterparty 11
 

 

 

 

Counterparty 12
 
8

 

 

 
8

Total
 
$
25,628

 
$
8,588

 
$

 
$
17,040

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, 2012
Counterparty
 
Gross Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
Financial Instruments
 
Cash Collateral Pledged
 
Net Amount
 
 
($ in thousands)
Counterparty 1
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Counterparty 2
 
1,761

 
1,761

 

 

Counterparty 3
 
4,850

 
4,850

 

 

Counterparty 4
 
1,812

 
124

 
1,688

 

Counterparty 5
 
2,456

 
526

 
1,930

 

Counterparty 6
 
1,080

 
1,080

 

 

Counterparty 7
 
1,017

 
231

 
786

 

Counterparty 8
 
16

 
16

 

 

Counterparty 9
 

 

 

 

Counterparty 10
 

 

 

 

Counterparty 11
 

 

 

 

Counterparty 12
 

 

 

 

Total
 
$
12,992

 
$
8,588

 
$
4,404

 
$










F-25



10.
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, loss and loss adjustment expense reserves in the consolidated balance sheets was comprised of the following:
 
December 31,
2013
 
December 31,
2012
 
($ in thousands)
Case loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
$
34,307

 
$
3,668

Incurred but not reported loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
100,024

 
63,603

 
$
134,331

 
$
67,271

The following table represents the activity in the reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
 
2013
 
2012
 
($ in thousands)
Gross reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses, beginning of year
$
67,271

 
$

Less: loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable, beginning of year

 

Net reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses, beginning of year
67,271

 

Increase (decrease) in net loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred in respect of losses occurring in:
 
 
 
     Current year
144,509

 
80,306

     Prior years'
(4,697
)
 

Total incurred loss and loss adjustment expenses
139,812

 
80,306

Net loss and loss adjustment expenses paid in respect of losses occurring in:
 
 
 
     Current year
(27,528
)
 
(13,035
)
     Prior years'
(54,501
)
 

Total net paid losses
(82,029
)
 
(13,035
)
Net reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses, end of year
125,054

 
67,271

Plus: loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable, end of year
9,277

 

Gross reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses, end of year
$
134,331

 
$
67,271


The $4.7 million decrease in prior years' reserves reflects $1.3 million of favorable loss experience on several contracts and $3.4 million related to premium estimate decreases, primarily related to one crop contract. The reduction in loss and loss adjustment expense reserves related to premium estimates was accompanied by an equal decrease in the premium written and earned for that contract, resulting in a minimal impact to net underwriting income.
11. Management, performance and Founders fees
The Company and Third Point Re are party to a Joint Venture and Investment Management Agreement (the “Investment Agreement”) with Third Point LLC and Third Point Advisors LLC under which Third Point LLC manages certain jointly held assets.
Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, Third Point Advisors LLC receives an annual performance fee allocation equal to 20% of the net investment income of the Company’s share of the investment assets managed by Third Point LLC, subject to a loss carry forward provision. Additionally, a total management fee equal to 2% annually of the Company’s share of the investment assets managed by Third Point LLC is paid to Third Point LLC and various Founders of the Company. Management fees are paid monthly, whereas performance fees are paid annually, in arrears. 

F-26



Investment fee expenses related to the Investment Agreement, which are included in net investment income in the consolidated statements of income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
($ in thousands)
Management fees - Third Point LLC
 
$
3,651

 
$
2,444

Management fees - Founders
 
20,686

 
13,854

Performance fees - Third Point Advisors LLC
 
62,996

 
33,913

 
 
$
87,333

 
$
50,211

As of December 31, 2013 , $63.0 million (December 31, 2012 - $33.9 million ) was included in non-controlling interests related to the performance fee payable to Third Point Advisors LLC. Since the performance fee allocation is based on annual performance, the performance fees are included in total liabilities until the performance fee is determined at year end and allocated to Third Point Advisors LLC’s capital account, in accordance with the Investment Agreement.
12.
Deposit contracts
Effective October 1, 2012, Third Point Re entered into an aggregate excess of loss agreement for consideration of $50.0 million . Under the terms of the agreement, Third Point Re maintains a notional experience account, the value of which is the $50.0 million of consideration less claims paid plus a crediting rate multiplied by the annual starting balance of the notional experience account. The crediting rate varies from a minimum of 3% to a maximum of 6.1% , based on actual investment returns realized by the Company.
Effective May 1, 2013, Third Point Re entered into an aggregate excess of loss agreement for consideration of $25.0 million . Under the terms of the agreement, Third Point Re maintains a notional experience account, the value of which is the $25.0 million of consideration less claims paid plus a crediting rate multiplied by the annual starting balance of the notional experience account. The crediting rate varies from a minimum of 3% to a maximum of 6.5% , based on actual investment returns realized by the Company.
Effective June 30, 2013, Third Point Re entered into two loss portfolio contracts for consideration of $27.2 million . Under the terms of the agreements, Third Point Re maintains a notional experience account, the initial value of which is based on the consideration received less a margin. The value of the experience account is reduced by loss payments as they are made and increased by a quarterly interest credit of 0.625% .
Effective July 1, 2013, Third Point Re entered into a contract for consideration of $14.2 million. Under the terms of the agreement, Third Point Re maintains a notional experience account, the initial value of which is based on the consideration received less a margin. The value of the experience account is reduced by loss payments as they are made and increased by a quarterly interest credit of 0.625% .
The following table details the deposit liabilities as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
 
December 31,
2013
 
December 31,
2012
 
($ in thousands)
Initial consideration received
$
116,369

 
$
50,000

Net investment expense accrued
5,177

 
446

Payments
(600
)
 

 
$
120,946

 
$
50,446








F-27



13. General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and period from October 6, 2011 (incorporation date) to December 31, 2011 are as follows:
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
($ in thousands)
Payroll and related
 
$
13,490

 
$
13,780

 
$
698

Share compensation expenses
 
9,800

 
6,408

 

Legal and accounting
 
3,312

 
1,436

 
149

Travel and entertainment
 
2,473

 
1,887

 

IT related
 
1,290

 
1,417

 

Corporate insurance
 
744

 
365

 

Credit facility fees
 
605

 
677

 

Occupancy
 
420

 
595

 
34

Director and board costs
 
213

 
236

 

Other general and administrative expenses
 
689

 
575

 
249

 
 
$
33,036

 
$
27,376

 
$
1,130


14. Net investment income
Net investment income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 a consisted of the following:
 
 
2013
 
2012
Net investment income by type
($ in thousands)
Net unrealized gains on investments and investment derivatives
 
$
78,950

 
$
113,422

Net realized gains on investments and investment derivatives
 
236,333

 
55,632

Net gain (loss) on foreign currencies
 
21,106

 
(219
)
Dividend and interest income, net of withholding taxes
 
14,233

 
25,284

Dividends paid on securities sold, not yet purchased
 
(722
)
 
(1,629
)
Management and performance fees
 
(87,333
)
 
(50,211
)
Other expenses
 
(8,863
)
 
(5,411
)
Net investment income on investments managed by Third Point LLC
 
253,704

 
136,868

Deposit liabilities and reinsurance contracts investment expense
 
(4,922
)
 
(446
)
Investment income on cash collateral held by the Catastrophe Reinsurer
 
86

 

Net gain on reinsurance contract derivatives written by the Catastrophe Reinsurer
 
4,335

 

 
 
$
253,203

 
$
136,422


F-28



 
 
2013
 
2012
Net investment income by asset class
 
($ in thousands)
Net investment gains on equity securities
 
$
243,449

 
$
96,210

Net investment gains on debt securities
 
69,194

 
65,040

Net investment gains (losses) on other investments
 
(5,045
)
 
7,386

Net investment gains on derivatives
 
29,257

 
5,793

Net investment gains (losses) on securities sold, not yet purchased
 
(5,974
)
 
17,076

Net investment income (loss) on cash
 
17,961

 
(1,230
)
Net investment gains on securities purchased under and agreement to resell
 
1,863

 
562

Management and performance fees
 
(87,333
)
 
(50,211
)
Other investment expenses
 
(5,247
)
 
(3,758
)
Deposit liabilities and reinsurance contracts investment expense
 
(4,922
)
 
(446
)
 
 
$
253,203

 
$
136,422



15.
Share capital
Authorized and issued
The Company's authorized share capital of $33.0 million is comprised of 300,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.10 each and 30,000,000 preference shares with a par value of $0.10 each. As of December 31, 2013 , 103,888,916 common shares were issued and outstanding. No preference shares have been issued to date.

On August 20, 2013, the Company completed an IPO of 24,832,484 common shares at a purchase price of $12.50 per share. The net proceeds of the offering were $286.0 million , after deducting offering costs.
Warrants
The Company’s Founders and an advisor provided insurance industry expertise, resources and relationships to ensure that the Company would be fully operational with key management in place in time for the January 2012 underwriting season. In consideration of these commitments, the Company reserved for issuance to the Founders and an advisor warrants to purchase, in the aggregate, up to 4.0% (Founders 3.5% and an advisor 0.5% ) of the diluted shares (up to a maximum of $1 billion of subscribed shares) provided that the Founders and the advisor will not be issued any warrants for common shares issued in consideration for any capital raised by the Company in excess of $1 billion . The following is a summary of warrants as of December 31, 2013 :
 
Exercise price
 
Authorized and
issued
 
Aggregated fair
value of
warrants
 
($ in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)
Founders
$
10.00

 
4,069,868

 
$
15,203

Advisor
$
10.00

 
581,295

 
2,171

 
 
 
4,651,163

 
$
17,374

The warrants were subject to a performance condition that was met as a result of the IPO. Prior to the IPO, 3,648,006 of the warrants outstanding had met the performance condition. After the IPO, the remaining 1,003,157 warrants met the performance condition. For the year ended December 31, 2013 , the Company recorded $3.7 million related to the additional warrants that met the performance condition as a result of the IPO. These amounts have been recorded as a component of capital raise costs in additional paid in capital resulting in no net impact to total shareholders’ equity.
The warrants expire 10 years from the date of issuance, December 22, 2011, and will be exercisable at a price per share of $10.00 , which is equal to the price per share paid by investors in the initial private offering.

F-29



16.
Share-based compensation
On July 15, 2013, the Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. 2103 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“Omnibus Plan”) was approved by the Board of Directors and subsequently on August 2, 2013 by the Shareholders of the Company. An aggregate of 21,627,906 common shares were made available under the Omnibus Plan. This number of shares includes the shares available under the Third Point Reinsurance Limited Share Incentive Plan ("Share Incentive Plan"). Awards under the Omnibus Plan may be made in the form of performance awards, restricted shares, restricted share units, share options, share appreciation rights and other share-based awards.
As of December 31, 2013 , 10,613,975 of the Company's common shares were available for future issuance under the equity incentive compensation plans.
Share based compensation expense of $9.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 ( 2012 - $6.4 million ) was included in general and administrative expenses, which included $2.1 million related to additional expense incurred due to the performance condition having been met as a result of the IPO.
As of December 31, 2013 , the Company had $23.8 million of unamortized share compensation expense which is expected to be amortized over a weighted average period of 2.0 years .
(a)
Management and director options
The management options issued under the Share Incentive Plan were subject to a service and performance condition. The service condition will be met with respect to 20% of the management options on each of the first five anniversary dates following the grant date of the management options. The performance condition with respect to the management options was met as a result of the IPO. Prior to the IPO, 8,572,594 of the management options outstanding had met the performance condition. After the IPO, the remaining 2,357,633 management options had met the performance condition.
The director options contain only a service condition that will be met with respect to 20% of the director options on each of the five anniversary dates following the grant date of the director options. On November 6, 2013, the director options were modified so that a total of 60% of the outstanding options vested on that date and the remaining 40% of the director options were forfeited. These forfeited options were replaced with restricted share awards.
The management and director options activity for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
 
Number of
options
 
Weighted
average exercise
price
Balances as of January 1, 2012

 

Granted - employees
10,872,090

 
13.20

Granted - directors
84,748

 
13.20

Forfeited

 

Exercised

 
 
Balances as of December 31, 2012
10,956,838

 
13.20

Granted - employees
348,836

 
14.09

Granted - directors

 
 
Forfeited
(324,599
)
 
13.20

Exercised

 
 
Balances as of December 31, 2013
10,981,075

 
$
13.23

The fair value of share options issued were estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The estimated share price used for purposes of determining the fair value of share options that were granted in the

F-30



second quarter of 2013 (prior to the IPO) was $10.89 (2012 - $10.00 ). The volatility assumption used of 21.95% (2012 - 31.25% ) was based on the average estimated volatility of a reinsurance company peer group. The other assumptions used in the option-pricing model were as follows: risk free interest rate of 1.23% (2012 - 1.9% ), expected life of 6.5 years (2012 - 10.0 years ) and a 0.0% dividend yield (2012 - 0.0% ). As of December 31, 2013, the weighted average remaining contractual term for options outstanding was 8.1 years (2012 - 9.0 years ).
The following table summarizes information about the Company’s management and director share options outstanding as of December 31, 2013 :
 
Options outstanding
 
Options exercisable
Range of exercise prices
Number of
options
 
Weighted
average
exercise price
 
Remaining
contractual
life
 
Number of
options
 
Weighted
average
exercise price
$10.00-$10.89
6,588,647

 
$
10.03

 
8.06
 
1,872,367

 
$
10.00

$16.00-$16.89
2,196,214

 
$
16.03

 
8.06
 
624,123

 
$
16.00

$20.00-$20.89
2,196,214

 
$
20.03

 
8.06
 
624,123

 
$
20.00

 
10,981,075

 
$
13.23

 
8.06
 
3,120,613

 
$
13.20

For the year ended December 31, 2013 , the Company recorded $8.3 million ( 2012 - $4.8 million ) of share compensation expense related to share options, which included $2.1 million related to additional expense incurred related to the performance condition being met as a result of the IPO.
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable as of December 31, 2013 was $61.5 million and $17.6 million , respectively (2012 - $5.9 million and $0.5 million , respectively).
(b)
Restricted shares
Restricted shares vest either ratably or at the end of the required service period and contain certain restrictions during the vesting period, relating to, among other things, forfeiture in the event of termination of employment or service and transferability.
Restricted share award activity for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:
 
Number of non-
vested restricted
shares
 
Weighted
average grant
date fair value
Balance as of January 1, 2012

 
$

Granted
641,800

 
10.00

Forfeited
(22,500
)
 
10.00

Vested

 
 
Balance as of December 31, 2012
619,300

 
10.00

Granted
37,856

 
15.22

Forfeited

 
 
Vested

 
 
Balance as of December 31, 2013
657,156

 
$
10.30

For the year ended December 31, 2013 , the Company issued 5,000 (2012 - 641,800 ) restricted shares to employees. The restricted shares issued to employees in 2013 will cliff vest after 2 years from the date of issuance, subject to the grantee's continued service with the Company. The restricted shares issued in 2012 cliff vest after 3 or 5 years from the date of issuance, subject to the grantee's continued service with the Company.

F-31



For the year ended December 31, 2013 , the Company also awarded 32,856 restricted shares (2012 - none ) to non-employee directors pursuant to the Company's Omnibus Plan. Each of the restricted shares issued to non-employee directors contain similar restrictions to those issued to employees and will vest on December 31, 2014, subject to the grantee's continued service with the Company.
For the year ended December 31, 2013 , the Company recorded $1.5 million ( 2012 - $1.6 million ) compensation expense related to restricted share awards.


17.
Non-controlling interests
Non-controlling interests represent the portion of equity in consolidated subsidiaries not attributable, directly or indirectly, to the Company. The ownership interests in consolidated subsidiaries held by parties other than the Company have been presented in the consolidated balance sheets, as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Non-controlling interests as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
 
December 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
($ in thousands)
Catastrophe Fund
$
49,254

 
$
19,646

Catastrophe Fund Manager
(236
)
 
2

Joint Venture - Third Point Advisors LLC share
69,717

 
40,129

 
$
118,735

 
$
59,777

Income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was:
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
($ in thousands)
Catastrophe Fund
 
$
4,284

 
$

Catastrophe Fund Manager
 
(238
)
 

Joint Venture - Third Point Advisors LLC share
 
1,721

 
1,216

 
 
$
5,767

 
$
1,216

As of December 31, 2013 , the following entities were consolidated in line with voting model per ASC 810: Consolidation:
• Third Point Reinsurance Opportunities Fund Ltd.
• Third Point Re Cat Ltd.
• Third Point Reinsurance Investment Management Ltd.
As of December 31, 2013 , the following entities were consolidated in line with variable interest model as per ASC 810: Consolidation:
• Investment Joint Venture
a)
Third Point Reinsurance Opportunities Fund Ltd. and Third Point Re Cat Ltd.
As of December 31, 2013 , Third Point Re's investment in the Catastrophe Fund was $54.8 million ( December 31, 2012 - $22.0 million ), representing approximately 53% of the Catastrophe Fund’s issued, non-voting, participating share capital. The objective of the Catastrophe Fund is to achieve positive uncorrelated investment returns by investing, through the Catastrophe Reinsurer, in a portfolio of collateralized reinsurance transactions and other insurance-linked investments, including catastrophe bonds and industry loss warranties.

F-32



The Catastrophe Fund Manager holds 100% of the authorized and issued voting, nonparticipating shares of the Catastrophe Fund, while the Catastrophe Fund’s investors, including Third Point Re, hold 100% of issued non-voting, participating shares.
Furthermore, 100% of the authorized and issued voting, non-participating share capital of the Catastrophe Reinsurer and 100% of the issued non-voting, participating share capital of the Catastrophe Reinsurer is held by the Catastrophe Fund.
For the year ended December 31, 2013 , the Catastrophe Fund called $53.0 million (Third Point Re’s share - $28.0 million ) of committed capital resulting in a contribution to non-controlling interests for the Catastrophe Fund of $25.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 .
b)
Third Point Reinsurance Investment Management Ltd. (the “Catastrophe Fund Manager”)
The Catastrophe Fund Manager has been consolidated as part of the Company with Hiscox’s 15% interest in the Catastrophe Fund Manager recorded as a non-controlling interest. The Catastrophe Fund Manager acts as manager for both the Catastrophe Fund and the Catastrophe Reinsurer and in that capacity is responsible for overseeing:
The investment activities of the Catastrophe Fund, and
The underwriting activities of the Catastrophe Reinsurer.
The Catastrophe Fund Manager does not participate in the profits or losses of either the Catastrophe Fund or the Catastrophe Reinsurer; however, the Catastrophe Fund Manager does receive management and performance fees for its advisory services.
c)
Third Point Advisors LLC
The joint venture created through the Investment Agreement (Note 11) has been considered a variable interest entity in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Since the Company was deemed to be the primary beneficiary, the Company has consolidated the joint venture and has recorded Third Point Advisors LLC’s minority interest as a non-controlling interest in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity.
For the year ended December 31, 2013 , $35.1 million (2012 - $ nil ) was distributed by Third Point Advisors LLC and reduced the amount of the non-controlling interest.

F-33




18.
Earnings per share
The following sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011:
 
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:
 
($ in thousands)
 
Basic number of common shares outstanding
 
87,505,540

 
78,432,132

 
78,432,132

 
Dilutive effect of options
 
400,149

 

 

 
Dilutive effect of warrants
 
1,064,842

 
166,104

 

 
Diluted number of common shares outstanding
 
88,970,531

 
78,598,236

 
78,432,132

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic net income (loss) per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
 
$
227,311

 
$
99,401

 
$
(1,130
)
 
Income allocated to participating shares
 
(1,618
)
 
(734
)
 

 
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
 
$
225,693

 
$
98,667

 
$
(1,130
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic net income (loss) per common share
 
$
2.58

 
$
1.26

 
$
(0.01
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Diluted net income (loss) per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
 
$
227,311

 
$
99,401

 
$
(1,130
)
 
Income allocated to participating securities
 
(1,592
)
 
(737
)
 

 
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
 
$
225,719

 
$
98,664

 
$
(1,130
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted net income (loss) per common share
 
$
2.54

 
$
1.26

 
$
(0.01
)

For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011, anti-dilutive options and warrants of 3,786,173 , 3,052,091 and 3,648,006 , respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share.
19. Related party transactions
In addition to the transactions disclosed in Notes 5, 11 and 17 to these consolidated financial statements, the following additional transactions are classified as related party transactions, as each counterparty has either a direct or indirect shareholding in the Company or the Company has an investment in such counterparty.
a)
Pine Brook Road Partners, LLC and Narragansett Bay Insurance Company
Third Point Re entered into a quota share reinsurance agreement with Narragansett Bay Insurance Company (“Narragansett Bay”) effective December 31, 2012, which was renewed on December 31, 2013. The Company recorded $4.7 million of premiums related to these contracts for the year ended December 31, 2013 (December 31, 2012 - $9.0 million ).  Pine Brook Road Partners, LLC (“Pine Brook”) is the manager of an investment fund that owns common shares and warrants issued by the Company. Pine Brook currently owns approximately 12.0% of the Company’s outstanding common shares. Pine Brook is also the manager of an investment fund that owns common shares in Narragansett Bay.
b)
TP Lux Holdco LP
Third Point Re entered into a limited partnership agreement, as one of the limited partners of TP Lux Holdco LP (the “Cayman HoldCo”), which is also an affiliate of the Investment Manager. The Cayman HoldCo was formed as a limited partnership under the laws of the Cayman Islands and invests and holds debt and equity interests in TP Lux HoldCo S.a.r.l, a Luxembourg private limited liability company (the “LuxCo”), which is also an affiliate of the Investment Manager.

F-34



The LuxCo was established under the laws of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg and its principle objective is to act as a collective investment vehicle to purchase Euro debt and equity investments. Third Point Re invests in the Cayman HoldCo alongside other investment funds managed by the Investment Manager. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, Third Point Re held approximately a 10% interest in the Cayman Holdco. As a result, Third Point Re accounts for its investment in the limited partnership under the variable interest model, in which Third Point Re is not the primary beneficiary, at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets and records the change in the fair value in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
As of December 31, 2013 , the estimated fair value of the investment in the limited partnership was $29.3 million ( December 31, 2012 - $91.3 million).  The valuation policy with respect to this investment in a limited partnership is further described in Note 5.

c)
Third Point Loan L.L.C.
Third Point Loan L.L.C. (“Loan LLC”) serves as nominee of Third Point Re and other affiliated investment management clients of the Investment Manager for certain investments. Loan LLC has appointed the Investment Manager as its true and lawful agent and attorney. As of December 31, 2013 , Loan LLC held $147.2 million ( December 31, 2012 - $43.7 million) of Third Point Re’s investments, which are included in investments in securities and in derivative contracts in the consolidated balance sheets. Third Point Re’s pro rata interest in the underlying investments registered in the name of the Loan LLC and the related income and expense are reflected accordingly in the consolidated balance sheets and the consolidated statements of income (loss).
d)
Third Point Hellenic Recovery US Feeder Fund, L.P.
Third Point Re is a limited partner in Third Point Hellenic Recovery US Feeder Fund, L.P. (“Hellenic Fund”), which is an affiliate of the Investment Manager. The Hellenic Fund was formed as a limited partnership under the laws of the Cayman Islands and invests and holds debt and equity interests.
Third Point Re committed $11.4 million in the Hellenic Fund, of which $4.3 million was called during the year ended December 31, 2013 . As of December 31, 2013 , the estimated fair value of Third Point Re’s investment in the Hellenic Fund was $5.3 million. The valuation policy with respect to this investment in a limited partnership is further described in Note 5.
As of December 31, 2013 , Third Point Re held less than a 2% interest in the Hellenic Fund. As a result, Third Point Re accounts for its investment in the Hellenic Fund under the variable interest model, in which Third Point Re is not the primary beneficiary, at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets and records the change in the fair value in the consolidated statements of income (loss).

20.
Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk or concentrations of credit risk
Off-balance sheet risk
In the normal course of business, the Company trades various financial instruments and engages in various investment activities with off-balance sheet risk. These financial instruments include securities sold, not yet purchased, forwards, futures, options, swaptions, swaps and contracts for differences. Generally, these financial instruments represent future commitments to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specified future dates. Each of these financial instruments contains varying degrees of off-balance sheet risk whereby changes in the fair values of the securities underlying the financial instruments or fluctuations in interest rates and index values may exceed the amounts recognised in the consolidated balance sheets.
Securities sold, not yet purchased are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and have market risk to the extent that the Company, in satisfying its obligations, may be required to purchase securities at a higher value than that recorded in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s investments in securities and amounts due from brokers are partially restricted until the Company satisfies the obligation to deliver securities sold, not yet purchased.

F-35



Forward and futures contracts are a commitment to purchase or sell financial instruments, currencies or commodities at a future date at a negotiated rate. Forward and futures contracts expose the Company to market risks to the extent that adverse changes occur to the underlying financial instruments such as currency rates or equity index fluctuations.
Option contracts give the purchaser the right, but not the obligation, to purchase or sell to the option writer financial instruments, commodities or currencies within a defined time period for a specified price. The premium received by the Company upon writing an option contract is recorded as a liability, marked to market on a daily basis and is included in securities sold, not yet purchased in the consolidated balance sheets. In writing an option, the Company bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the financial instrument underlying the written option. Exercise of an option written by the Company could result in the Company selling or buying a financial instrument at a price different from the current fair value.
Swaption contracts give the Company the right, but not the obligation, to enter into a specified interest-rate swap within a specified period of time. The Company’s market and counterparty credit risk is limited to the premium paid to enter into the swaption contract and net unrealized gains.
Total return swaps, contracts for differences, index swaps, and interest rate swaps that involve the exchange of cash flows between the Company and counterparties are based on the change in the fair value of a particular equity, index, or interest rate on a specified notional holding. The use of these contracts exposes the Company to market risks equivalent to actually holding securities of the notional value but typically involve little capital commitment relative to the exposure achieved. The gains or losses of the Company may therefore be magnified on the capital commitment.
Credit derivatives
Credit default swaps protect the buyer against the loss of principal on one or more underlying bonds, loans, or mortgages in the event the issuer suffers a credit event. Typical credit events include failure to pay or restructuring of obligations, bankruptcy, dissolution or insolvency of the underlying issuer. The buyer of the protection pays an initial and/or a periodic premium to the seller and receives protection for the period of the contract. If there is not a credit event, as defined in the contract, the buyer receives no payments from the seller. If there is a credit event, the buyer receives a payment from the seller of protection as calculated by the contract between the two parties.
The Company may also enter into index and/or basket credit default swaps where the credit derivative may reference a basket of single-name credit default swaps or a broad-based index. Generally, in the event of a default on one of the underlying names, the buyer will receive a pro-rata portion of the total notional amount of the credit default index or basket contract from the seller. When the Company purchases single-name, index and basket credit default swaps, the Company is exposed to counterparty nonperformance.
Upon selling credit default swap protection, the Company may expose itself to the risk of loss from related credit events specified in the contract. Credit spreads of the underlying together with the period of expiration is indicative of the likelihood of a credit event under the credit default swap contract and the Company’s risk of loss. Higher credit spreads and shorter expiration dates are indicative of a higher likelihood of a credit event resulting in the Company’s payment to the buyer of protection. Lower credit spreads and longer expiration dates would indicate the opposite and lowers the likelihood the Company needs to pay the buyer of protection. Cash collateral available to the Company to mitigate potential counterparty risk related to written credit default swaps amounted to $1.6 million as of December 31, 2013 . Cash collateral received is based on the net exposure associated with all derivative instruments subject to applicable netting agreements with counterparties and may not be specific to any individual derivative contract. 

F-36



The following table sets forth certain information related to the Company’s written credit derivatives as of December 31, 2013 :
 
 
Maximum Payout/ Notional Amount (by period of expiration)
 
Fair Value of Written Credit Derivatives (2)
Credit Spreads on
underlying (basis
points)
 
0-5 years
 
5 years or
Greater Expiring Through 2046
 
Total Written
Credit Default
Swaps (1)
 
Asset
 
Liability
 
Net Asset/(Liability)
 
 
($ in thousands)
Single name (0 - 250)
 
$
368

 
$

 
$
368

 
$

 
(104
)
 
(104
)
Single name (251-500)
 
9,514

 

 
9,514

 
1,136

 

 
1,136

 Index (0-250)
 

 
550

 
550

 
21

 
(244
)
 
(223
)
 
 
$
9,882

 
$
550

 
$
10,432

 
$
1,157

 
$
(348
)
 
$
809

(1)
As of December 31, 2013 , the Company did not hold any offsetting buy protection credit derivatives with the same underlying reference obligation.
(2)
Fair value amounts of derivative contracts are shown on a gross basis prior to cash collateral or counterparty netting.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company sold protection on an index-reference obligation with a maximum potential payout amount of $0.4 million , a credit spread of 0.44% and maturity in 2046. The fair value of such protection sold totaled $0.2 million as of December 31, 2012.
Concentrations of credit risk
In addition to off-balance sheet risks related to specific financial instruments, the Company may be subject to concentration of credit risk with particular counterparties. Substantially all securities transactions of the Company are cleared by several major securities firms. The Company had substantially all such individual counterparty concentration with these brokers or their affiliates as of December 31, 2013 . However, the Company reduces its credit risk with counterparties by entering into master netting agreements. Therefore, assets represent the Company’s greater unrealized gains less unrealized losses for derivative contracts in which the Company has master netting agreements. Similarly, liabilities represent the Company’s greater unrealized losses less unrealized gains for derivative contracts in which the Joint Venture has master netting agreements. Furthermore, the Company obtains collateral from counterparties to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk.
The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance on derivative contracts is limited to the net unrealized gains by counterparty inherent in such contracts which are recognised in the consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2013 , the Company’s maximum counterparty credit risk exposure was $19.0 million ( December 31, 2012 - $17.0 million).

21.
Commitments and Contingencies
Operating lease
The Company leases office space at Chesney House in Bermuda. The lease expires on November 30, 2015. The lease has been accounted for as an operating lease. Total rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $ 0.4 million ( 2012 : $ 0.4 million , 2011: $0.03 million ).

F-37



Future minimum rental commitments as of December 31, 2013 under this lease are expected to be as follows:
 
($ in thousands)
2014
402

2015
368

2016

2017

 
$
770

Agreements
Third Point LLC
The Company and Third Point Re (together, the "Companies") entered into a 5 year investment management agreement with Third Point LLC on December 22, 2011. The Companies are parties to an Investment Agreement with Third Point LLC under which the Companies, Third Point LLC and Third Point Advisors LLC formed a joint venture for the purpose of managing certain jointly held assets. The non-controlling interest in the consolidated balance sheets includes Third Point Advisors LLC’s share of assets in the investment joint venture.
Netjets
On December 20, 2011, Third Point Re acquired from Netjets Sales Inc. (“Netjets”) an undivided 12.5% interest in two aircraft for a five year period. The agreement with NetJets provides for monthly management fees, occupied hourly fees and other fees. Future minimum management fee commitments as of December 31, 2013 under the existing lease are expected to be as follows:
 
($ in thousands)
2014
547

2015
567

2016
539

2017

 
$
1,653

Letters of credit
As of December 31, 2013 , the Company had entered into the following letter of credit facilities, which automatically renew annually unless terminated by either party in accordance with the required notice period:
 
Facility
 
Renewal date
 
Notice period (Unused Facility Portion)
 
($ in thousands)
 
 
 
 
BNP Paribas
$
100,000

 
February 15, 2015
 
 60 days prior to termination date
Citibank (1)
150,000

 
January 23, 2015
 
 90 days prior to termination date
J.P. Morgan
50,000

 
August 22, 2014
 
 60 days prior to termination date
 
$
300,000

 
 
 
 
(1)
Effective January 1, 2013, the Citibank facility was reduced from $250.0 million to $150.0 million .
As of December 31, 2013 , $ 127.3 million ( December 31, 2012 - $ 60.9 million ) of letters of credit, representing 42.4% ( December 31, 2012 15.3% (based on total available facilities of $400 million )) of the total available facilities, had been drawn upon.

F-38



Under the facilities, the Company provides collateral that may consist of equity securities, repurchase agreements and cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2013 , cash and cash equivalents with a fair value of $ 100.6 million ( December 31, 2012 - $ 64.8 million ) were pledged as security against the letters of credit issued. These amounts are included in restricted cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated balance sheets. Each of the facilities contain customary events of default and restrictive covenants, including but not limited to, limitations on liens on collateral, transactions with affiliates, mergers and sales of assets, as well as solvency and maintenance of certain minimum pledged equity requirements, A.M. Best Company rating of “A-” or higher, and restricts issuance of any debt without the consent of the letter of credit provider. Additionally, if an event of default exists, as defined in the letter of credit facilities, the Company will be prohibited from paying dividends. The Company was in compliance with all of the covenants as of December 31, 2013 .
Investments
Loan and other participation interests purchased by the Company, such as bank debt, may include revolving credit arrangements or other financing commitments obligating the Company to advance additional amounts on demand. As of December 31, 2013 , the Company had no unfunded capital commitments.
In the normal course of business, the Company, as part of its investment strategy, enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications and warranties. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Company that have not yet occurred. However, the Company has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote. Thus, no amounts have been accrued related to such indemnifications. The Company also indemnifies Third Point Advisors LLC, Third Point LLC and its employees from and against any loss or expense, including, without limitation any judgment, settlement, legal fees and other costs. Any expenses related to this indemnification are reflected in net investment income in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Litigation
From time to time in the normal course of business, the Company may be involved in formal and informal dispute resolution procedures, which may include arbitration or litigation, the outcomes of which determine the rights and obligations under the Company's reinsurance contracts and other contractual agreements. In some disputes, the Company may seek to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it.  In other matters, the Company may resist attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights. While the final outcome of legal disputes that may arise cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company is not currently involved in any formal or informal dispute resolution procedures.
Segment reporting
The determination of the Company’s business segments is based on the manner in which management monitors the performance of its operations. The Company reports two operating segments – Property and Casualty Reinsurance and Catastrophe Risk Management. The Company has also identified a corporate function that includes the Company’s investment results and certain general and administrative expenses related to corporate activities.
The following is a summary of the Company’s operating segments results for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 :

F-39



 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Property and Casualty Reinsurance
 
Catastrophe Risk Management
 
Corporate
 
Total
Revenues
($ in thousands)
Gross premiums written
$
393,588

 
$
8,349

 
$

 
$
401,937

Gross premiums ceded
(9,975
)
 

 

 
(9,975
)
Net premiums written
383,613

 
8,349

 

 
391,962

Change in net unearned premium reserves
(171,006
)
 
(289
)
 

 
(171,295
)
Net premiums earned
212,607

 
8,060

 

 
220,667

Net investment income

 
4,421

 
248,782

 
253,203

Total revenues
212,607

 
12,481

 
248,782

 
473,870

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net
139,616

 
196

 

 
139,812

Acquisition costs, net
66,981

 
963

 

 
67,944

General and administrative expenses
21,838

 
3,852

 
7,346

 
33,036

Total expenses
228,435

 
5,011

 
7,346

 
240,792

Underwriting loss
(15,828
)
 
 n/a

 
 n/a

 
 n/a

Income including non-controlling interests
 n/a

 
7,470

 
241,436

 
233,078

Income attributable to non-controlling interests
 n/a

 
(4,046
)
 
(1,721
)
 
(5,767
)
Net income (loss)
$
(15,828
)
 
$
3,424

 
$
239,715

 
$
227,311

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property and Casualty Reinsurance - Underwriting Ratios:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss ratio (1)
65.7
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisition cost ratio (2)
31.5
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative expense ratio (3)
10.3
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Combined ratio (4)
107.5
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Loss ratio is calculated by dividing loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net by net premiums earned.
(2)
Acquisition cost ratio is calculated by dividing acquisition costs, net by net premiums earned.
(3)
General and administrative expense ratio is calculated by dividing general and administrative expenses related to underwriting activities by net premiums earned.
(4)
Combined ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net, acquisition costs, net and general and administrative expenses related to underwriting activities by net premiums earned.


F-40



 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
Property and Casualty Reinsurance
 
Catastrophe Risk Management
 
Corporate
 
Total
Revenues
($ in thousands)
Gross premiums written
$
190,374

 
$

 
$

 
$
190,374

Gross premiums ceded

 

 

 

Net premiums written
190,374

 

 

 
190,374

Change in net unearned premium reserves
(93,893
)
 

 

 
(93,893
)
Net premiums earned
96,481

 

 

 
96,481

Net investment income

 

 
136,422

 
136,422

Total revenues
96,481

 

 
136,422

 
232,903

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net
80,306

 

 

 
80,306

Acquisition costs, net
24,604

 

 

 
24,604

General and administrative expenses
20,290

 
1,534

 
5,552

 
27,376

Total expenses
125,200

 
1,534

 
5,552

 
132,286

Underwriting loss
(28,719
)
 
 n/a

 
 n/a

 
 n/a

Income (loss) including non-controlling interests
 n/a

 
(1,534
)
 
130,870

 
100,617

Income attributable to non-controlling interests
 n/a

 

 
(1,216
)
 
(1,216
)
Net income (loss)
$
(28,719
)
 
$
(1,534
)
 
$
129,654

 
$
99,401

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property and Casualty Reinsurance - Underwriting Ratios:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss ratio (1)
83.2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisition cost ratio (2)
25.5
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative expense ratio (3)
21.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Combined ratio (4)
129.7
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Loss ratio is calculated by dividing loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net by net premiums earned.
(2)
Acquisition cost ratio is calculated by dividing acquisition costs, net by net premiums earned.
(3)
General and administrative expense ratio is calculated by dividing general and administrative expenses related to underwriting activities by net premiums earned.
(4)
Combined ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net, acquisition costs, net and general and administrative expenses related to underwriting activities by net premiums earned.
For the year ended December 31, 2013 , three contracts individually contributed greater than 10% of total gross premiums written. These three contracts individually contributed 14.9% , 11.2% and 10.5% , respectively, of total gross premiums written for the year ended December 31, 2013 . For the year ended December 31, 2012 , three contracts each contributed greater than 10% of total gross premiums written. These three contracts contributed 22.3% , 20.0% and 11.8% , respectively, of total gross premiums written for the year ended December 31, 2012 .






F-41




The following table provides a breakdown of the Company’s gross premiums written by line of business for the
years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
 
2013
 
2012
 
($ in thousands)
Property
$
67,612

 
16.8
%
 
$
103,174

 
54.2
%
Casualty
210,017

 
52.2
%
 
44,700

 
23.5
%
Specialty
115,959

 
28.9
%
 
42,500

 
22.3
%
Total property and casualty reinsurance
393,588

 
97.9
%
 
190,374

 
100.0
%
Catastrophe risk management
8,349

 
2.1
%
 

 
%
 
$
401,937

 
100.0
%
 
$
190,374

 
100.0
%
The following table provides a breakdown of the Company’s gross premiums written by prospective and retroactive reinsurance contracts for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
 
2013
 
2012
 
($ in thousands)
Prospective
$
362,151

 
90.1
%
 
$
190,374

 
100.0
%
Retroactive
39,786

 
9.9
%
 

 
%
 
$
401,937

 
100.0
%
 
$
190,374

 
100.0
%
The Company records the gross premium written and earned at the inception of the contract for retroactive reinsurance contracts.
Substantially all of the Company’s business is sourced through reinsurance brokers. The following table provides a breakdown of the Company’s gross premiums written from brokers for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 :
 
2013
 
2012
 
($ in thousands)
Aon Benfield - a division of Aon plc
$
111,865

 
27.8
%
 
$
22,000

 
11.6
%
Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC
89,125

 
22.2
%
 
65,073

 
34.2
%
Advocate Reinsurance Partners, LLC
57,994

 
14.4
%
 
22,473

 
11.8
%
BMS Intermediaries
46,095

 
11.5
%
 
5,269

 
2.8
%
Other brokers
40,246

 
10.0
%
 
33,059

 
17.4
%
Total broker placed
345,325

 
85.9
%
 
147,874

 
77.8
%
Other
56,612

 
14.1
%
 
42,500

 
22.2
%
 
$
401,937

 
100.0
%
 
$
190,374

 
100.0
%
The following table provides a breakdown of the Company’s gross premiums written by domicile of the ceding companies for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 :
 
2013
 
2012
 
($ in thousands)
United States
$
304,141

 
75.7
%
 
$
190,374

 
100.0
%
Bermuda
96,396

 
24.0
%
 

 
%
Other
1,400

 
0.3
%
 

 
%
 
$
401,937

 
100.0
%
 
$
190,374

 
100.0
%



F-42




23. Statutory requirements

The following is a summary of actual and required statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the years then ended:
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
($ in thousands)
Actual statutory capital
 
$
1,303,487

 
$
824,453

Required statutory capital and surplus
 
526,933

 
116,416

Statutory net income
 
229,974

 
101,347

Under the Bermuda Insurance Act, 1978 and related regulations, Third Point Re is subject to capital requirements calculated using the Bermuda Solvency and Capital Requirement, or BSCR model, which is a standardized statutory risk-based capital model used to measure the risk associated with Third Point Re’s assets, liabilities and premiums. Third Point Re’s required statutory capital and surplus under the BSCR model is referred to as the enhanced capital requirement, or ECR. Third Point Re is required to calculate and submit the ECR to the Bermuda Monetary Authority, or the BMA, annually. Following receipt of the submission of Third Point Re’s ECR the BMA has the authority to impose additional capital requirements (capital add-ons) if it deems necessary. If a company fails to maintain or meet its ECR, the BMA may take various degrees of regulatory action. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, Third Point Re met its ECR.
The principal difference between statutory capital and surplus and shareholders' equity presented in accordance with GAAP is deferred acquisition costs and prepaid expenses, which are non-admitted assets for statutory purposes.
Third Point Re is also required under its Class 4 license to maintain a minimum liquidity ratio whereby the value of its relevant assets is not less than 75% of the amount of its relevant liabilities for general business. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, Third Point Re met the minimum liquidity ratio requirement.
Third Point Re may declare dividends subject to it continuing to meet its solvency and capital requirements, which includes continuing to hold statutory capital and surplus equal to or exceeding its ECR. Third Point Re is prohibited from declaring or paying in any fiscal year dividends of more than 25% of its prior year's statutory capital and surplus unless Third Point Re files with the BMA a signed affidavit by at least two members of the Board of Directors attesting that a dividend would not cause the company to fail to meet its relevant margins. As of December 31, 2013, Third Point Re could pay dividends in 2014 of approximately $325.9 million (2012 - $206.1 million ) without providing an affidavit to the BMA.


F-43



24. Quarterly financial results (UNAUDITED)
 
 
 
Quarters ended
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
September 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2013
 
March 31, 2013
 
 
($ in thousands)
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross premiums written
 
$
162,277

 
$
45,425

 
$
98,215

 
$
96,020

Gross premiums ceded
 

 

 

 
(9,975
)
Net premiums written
 
162,277

 
45,425

 
98,215

 
86,045

Change in net unearned premium reserves
 
(103,767
)
 
20,904

 
(35,928
)
 
(52,504
)
Net premiums earned
 
58,510

 
66,329

 
62,287

 
33,541

Net investment income
 
87,074

 
53,371

 
32,067

 
80,691

Total revenues
 
145,584

 
119,700

 
94,354

 
114,232

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net
 
36,133

 
39,349

 
45,692

 
18,638

Acquisition costs, net
 
18,833

 
21,117

 
14,921

 
13,073

General and administrative expense
 
8,965

 
9,846

 
7,217

 
7,008

Total expenses
 
63,931

 
70,312

 
67,830

 
38,719

Income including non-controlling interests
 
81,653

 
49,388

 
26,524

 
75,513

Income attributable to non-controlling interests
 
(1,565
)
 
(2,818
)
 
(301
)
 
(1,083
)
Net income
 
$
80,088

 
$
46,570

 
$
26,223

 
$
74,430

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings per share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
$
0.77

 
$
0.52

 
$
0.33

 
$
0.94

Diluted (1)
 
$
0.75

 
$
0.51

 
$
0.33

 
$
0.93

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average number of common shares used in the determination of earnings per share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
103,264,616

 
89,620,394

 
78,432,132

 
78,432,132

Diluted (1)
 
106,390,339

 
90,915,805

 
79,254,268

 
79,083,675


(1) - During the quarter, it was determined that diluted earnings per share for the prior periods had been calculated incorrectly, which resulted in
        an understatement of diluted earnings per share. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.



F-44



 
 
Quarters ended
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
September 30, 2012
 
June 30, 2012
 
March 31, 2012
 
 
($ in thousands)
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross premiums written
 
$
27,895

 
$
41,651

 
$
28,178

 
$
92,650

Gross premiums ceded
 

 

 

 

Net premiums written
 
27,895

 
41,651

 
28,178

 
92,650

Change in net unearned premium reserves
 
5,590

 
(7,333
)
 
(13,337
)
 
(78,813
)
Net premiums earned
 
33,485

 
34,318

 
14,841

 
13,837

Net investment income
 
72,511

 
47,686

 
(17,623
)
 
33,848

Total revenues
 
105,996

 
82,004

 
(2,782
)
 
47,685

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net
 
26,626

 
24,709

 
16,686

 
12,285

Acquisition costs, net
 
10,898

 
10,856

 
2,138

 
712

General and administrative expense
 
7,155

 
6,440

 
9,621

 
4,160

Total expenses
 
44,679

 
42,005

 
28,445

 
17,157

Income (loss) including non-controlling interests
 
61,317

 
39,999

 
(31,227
)
 
30,528

(Income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests
 
(607
)
 
(423
)
 
120

 
(306
)
Net income (loss)
 
$
60,710

 
$
39,576

 
$
(31,107
)
 
$
30,222

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings (loss) per share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
$
0.77

 
$
0.50

 
$
(0.40
)
 
$
0.38

Diluted (1)
 
$
0.76

 
$
0.50

 
$
(0.40
)
 
$
0.38

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average number of common shares used in the determination of earnings (loss) per share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
78,432,132

 
78,432,132

 
78,432,132

 
78,432,132

Diluted (1)
 
78,820,844

 
78,551,830

 
78,432,132

 
78,432,132


(1) - During the quarter, it was determined that diluted earnings per share for the prior periods had been calculated incorrectly, which resulted
         in an understatement of diluted earnings per share. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-45



THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
Schedule I - Summary of Investments - Other than Investments in Related Parties
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 Cost
 
 Fair value
 
 Balance sheet value
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity securities
 
$
743,528

 
$
857,817

 
$
857,817

Private common equity securities
 
81,195

 
96,294

 
96,294

Total equities
 
824,723

 
954,111

 
954,111

Asset-backed securities
 
309,509

 
325,533

 
325,533

Bank debts
 
7,885

 
8,017

 
8,017

Corporate bonds
 
69,570

 
86,749

 
86,749

Municipal bonds
 
12,025

 
10,486

 
10,486

Sovereign debt
 
9,765

 
10,639

 
10,639

Total debt securities
 
408,754

 
441,424

 
441,424

Investments in limited partnerships
 
24,666

 
34,578

 
34,578

Rights and warrants
 
1

 
1

 
1

Options
 
11,458

 
13,069

 
13,069

Trade claims
 
11,805

 
17,681

 
17,681

Total other investments
 
47,930

 
65,329

 
65,329

Total investments
 
$
1,281,407

 
$
1,460,864

 
$
1,460,864


F-46




THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
Schedule II - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Condensed Balance Sheets - Parent company only
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Assets
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
294

 
$
169

Investments in subsidiaries
 
1,394,644

 
870,116

Prepaid expenses
 
720

 
35

Amounts due from affiliates
 
417

 
770

Total assets
 
$
1,396,075

 
$
871,090

Liabilities and shareholders' equity
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
 
$
242

 
$
394

Amounts due to affiliates
 
4,172

 
2,152

Total liabilities
 
4,414

 
2,546

Commitments and contingent liabilities
 

 

Shareholders' equity
 
 
 
 
Preference shares (par value $0.10; authorized, 30,000,000; none issued)
 

 

Common shares (par value $0.10; authorized, 300,000,000; issued and outstanding, 103,888,916 (2012: 78,432,132))
 
10,389

 
7,843

Additional paid-in capital
 
1,055,690

 
762,430

Retained earnings
 
325,582

 
98,271

Total shareholders' equity
 
1,391,661

 
868,544

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
 
$
1,396,075

 
$
871,090


F-47





THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
Schedule II - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Condensed Statements of Income (Loss) - Parent company only
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation)
to December 31, 2011
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries
 
$
228,646

 
$
101,346

 
$
(1,092
)
Total revenues
 
228,646

 
101,346

 
(1,092
)
Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative expenses
 
1,335

 
1,945

 
38

Total expenses
 
1,335

 
1,945

 
38

Net income (loss)
 
$
227,311

 
$
99,401

 
$
(1,130
)


F-48




THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
Schedule II - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Condensed Statements of Cashflows - Parent company only
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation)
to December 31, 2011
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Operating activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
 
$
227,311

 
$
99,401

 
$
(1,130
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
 
(228,646
)
 
(101,346
)
 
1,092

Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prepaid expenses
 
(686
)
 
(33
)
 
(2
)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
 
(66
)
 
682

 
(413
)
Amounts due from affiliates
 
353

 
(770
)
 

Amounts due to affiliates
 
2,020

 
2,152

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
 
286

 
86

 
(453
)
Investing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contributed capital to subsidiaries
 
(286,257
)
 
(170,110
)
 
(593,343
)
Net cash used in investing activities
 
(286,257
)
 
(170,110
)
 
(593,343
)
Financing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net
 
286,096

 
158,593

 
605,396

Net cash provided by financing activities
 
286,096

 
158,593

 
605,396

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 
125

 
(11,431
)
 
11,600

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 
169

 
11,600

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
 
$
294

 
$
169

 
$
11,600

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental information:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends received from subsidiaries
 
$

 
$

 
$





F-49




THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
Schedule III - Supplementary Insurance Information
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation)
to December 31, 2011
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2013
 
Deferred acquisition costs, net
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
Unearned premium
Net premiums earned
Net investment income
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs, net
Other operating expenses
Net premiums written
Property and Casualty Reinsurance
$
91,141

$
134,221

$
264,898

$
212,607

$

$
139,616

$
66,981

$
21,838

$
383,613

Catastrophe Risk Management
52

110

289

8,060

4,421

196

963

3,852

8,349

Corporate




248,782



7,346


 
$
91,193

$
134,331

$
265,187

$
220,667

$
253,203

$
139,812

$
67,944

$
33,036

$
391,962

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2012
 
Deferred acquisition costs, net
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
Unearned premium
Net premiums earned
Net investment income
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs, net
Other operating expenses
Net premiums written
Property and Casualty Reinsurance
$
45,383

$
67,271

$
93,893

$
96,481

$

$
80,306

$
24,604

$
20,290

$
190,374

Catastrophe Risk Management







1,534


Corporate




136,422



5,552


 
$
45,383

$
67,271

$
93,893

$
96,481

$
136,422

$
80,306

$
24,604

$
27,376

$
190,374

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of and for the period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011
 
Deferred acquisition costs, net
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
Unearned premium
Net premiums earned
Net investment income
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred, net
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs, net
Other operating expenses
Net premiums written
Property and Casualty Reinsurance
$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

Catastrophe Risk Management









Corporate







1,130


 
$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$
1,130

$


F-50





THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
Schedule IV - Reinsurance
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation)
to December 31, 2011
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 
Direct gross premiums written
 
Ceded to other companies
 
Assumed from other companies
 
Net amount
 
Percentage of amount assumed to net
Year ended December 31, 2013
$

 
$
9,975

 
$
401,937

 
$
391,962

 
98
%
Year ended December 31, 2012

 

 
190,374

 
190,374

 
100
%
Period from October 6, 2011 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 
n/a



F-51



Exhibit 3.2




















BYE-LAWS
OF
THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.












TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTERPRETATION
1.
Definitions
SHARES
2.
Power to Issue Shares
3.
Power and Obligation of the Company to Purchase its Shares
4.
Rights Attaching to Shares
5.
Adjustment to Voting Power
6.
Certain Subsidiaries
7.
Special Actions
8.
Calls on Shares
9.
Forfeiture of Shares
10.
Share Certificates
11.
Fractional Shares
REGISTRATION OF SHARES
12.
Register of Members
13.
Registered Holder Absolute Owner
14.
Transfer of Registered Shares
15.
Transmission of Registered Shares
ALTERATION OF SHARE CAPITAL
16.
Power to Alter Capital
17.
Variation of Rights Attaching to Shares
DIVIDENDS AND CAPITALISATION
18.
Dividends
19.
Power to Set Aside Profits
20.
Method of Payment
21.
Capitalisation
MEETINGS OF MEMBERS
22.
Annual General Meetings
23.
Special General Meetings
24.
Requisitioned General Meetings
25.
Notice
26.
Giving Notice and Access
27.
Notice of Nominations and Member Business
28.
Postponement or Cancellation of General Meeting
29.
Electronic Participation and Security in Meetings
30.
Quorum at General Meetings
31.
Chairman to Preside at General Meetings
32.
Voting on Resolutions
33.
Power to Demand a Vote on a Poll
34.
Voting by Joint Holders of Shares
35.
Instrument of Proxy







36.
Representation of Corporate Member
37.
Adjournment of General Meeting
38.
Written Resolutions
39.
Directors Attendance at General Meetings
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
40.
Election of Directors
41.
Number of Directors
42.
Term of Office of Directors
43.
Alternate Directors; Board Observers
44.
Removal of Directors
45.
Vacancy in the Office of Director
46.
Remuneration of Directors
47.
Defect in Appointment
48.
Directors to Manage Business
49.
Powers of the Board of Directors
50.
[ Intentionally Omitted ]
51.
Register of Directors and Officers
52.
Appointment of Officers
53.
Appointment of Secretary
54.
Duties of Officers
55.
Remuneration of Officers
56.
Conflicts of Interest
57.
Indemnification and Exculpation of Directors and Officers
MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
58.
Board Meetings
59.
Notice of Board Meetings
60.
Electronic Participation in Meetings
61.
Quorum at Board Meetings
62.
Board to Continue in the Event of Vacancy
63.
Chairman to Preside
64.
Written Resolutions
65.
Validity of Prior Acts of the Board
CORPORATE RECORDS
66.
Minutes
67.
Place Where Corporate Records Kept
68.
Form and Use of Seal
ACCOUNTS
69.
Records of Account
70.
Financial Year End
AUDITS
71.
Annual Audit
72.
Appointment of Auditor
73.
Remuneration of Auditor
74.
Duties of Auditor
75.
Access to Records
76.
Financial Statements







77.
Distribution of Auditor’s Report
78.
Vacancy in the Office of Auditor
79.
Business Combinations
VOLUNTARY WINDING-UP AND DISSOLUTION
80.
Winding-Up
CHANGES TO CONSTITUTION
81.
Changes to Bye-laws
82.
Changes to the Memorandum of Association
83.
Discontinuance








INTERPRETATION
1.
Definitions
1.1
In these Bye-laws, the following words and expressions shall, where not inconsistent with the context, have the following meanings, respectively:
9.5% Shareholder
a U.S. Person that (a) owns (within the meaning of Section 958(a) of the Code) any shares and (b) owns, is deemed to own, or constructively owns Controlled Shares which confer votes in excess of 9.5% of the votes conferred by all of the issued and outstanding shares;
Act
the Companies Act 1981 as amended from time to time;
Affiliate
with respect to any Person, any other Person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control with such Person.
Alternate Director
an alternate director appointed in accordance with these Bye-laws;
Auditor
includes an individual or partnership;
Board
the board of directors appointed or elected pursuant to these Bye-laws and acting by resolution in accordance with the Act and these Bye-laws or the directors present at a meeting of directors at which there is a quorum;
Book Value
as of any date of determination, the fully diluted tangible book value per share of the Company, as reflected on the then most recent quarterly consolidated balance sheet of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries, prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; provided that the Board shall have the authority to determine Book Value with reference to a then more recent balance sheet of the Company prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles;
Code
The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, of the United States of America;
Company
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd., the company for which these Bye-laws are approved and confirmed;






Company Sale
the sale of all or substantially all of the issued and outstanding Shares of the Company and/or TP Re.
Controlled Group
with respect to any person, all shares directly owned by such person and all shares directly owned by each other Member any of whose shares are included in the Controlled Shares of such person;
Controlled Shares
in reference to any person, all shares that such person is deemed to own directly, indirectly (within the meaning of Section 958(a) of the Code) or, in the case of any U.S. Person, constructively (within the meaning of Section 958(b) of the Code);
Daily Share Price
with respect to the shares of the Company as of any Trading Day, the closing price of the shares of the Company on the New York Stock Exchange (or such other principal stock exchange or automated quotation system on which the shares of the Company are then traded) on such Trading Day;
Director
a director of the Company and shall include an Alternate Director;
Disinterested Board Members
Directors, other than Daniel S. Loeb or any other Director affiliated with or employed by the Sponsor or its Affiliates;
Effective Date
the first date on which Kelso (as defined in Bye-law 7.1) and their affiliates, Pine Brook (as defined in Bye-law 7.1) and their affiliates, and Daniel S. Loeb and his affiliates (collectively, “Daniel S. Loeb”), taken together, no longer beneficially own more than 35% of the voting power of the Company;
Fair Market Value
with respect to a repurchase of any shares of the Company in accordance with these Bye-laws, (i) if such shares are listed on a securities exchange (or quoted in a securities quotation system), the average closing sale price of such shares on such exchange (or in such quotation system), or, if such shares are listed on (or quoted in) more than one exchange (or quotation system), the average closing sale price of the shares on the principal securities exchange (or quotation system) on which such shares are then traded, or, if such shares






are not then listed on a securities exchange (or quotation system) but are traded in the over-the-counter market, the average of the latest bid and asked quotations for such shares in such market, in each case for the last five trading days immediately preceding the day on which notice of the repurchase of such shares is sent pursuant to these Bye-laws or (ii) if no such closing sales prices or quotations are available because such shares are not publicly traded or otherwise, the fair value of such shares as determined by one independent nationally recognised investment banking firm chosen by the Board and reasonably satisfactory to the Member whose shares are to be so repurchased by the Company, provided , that the calculation of the Fair Market Value of the shares made by such appointed investment banking firm (i) shall not include any discount relating to the absence of a public trading market for, or any transfer restrictions on, such shares, and (ii) such calculation shall be final and the fees and expenses stemming from such calculation shall be borne by the Company or its assignee, as the case may be;
Initial Public Offering
the first registered public offering of any class of common shares of the Company or TP Re under the United States securities laws or any amalgamation, scheme of arrangement or consolidation as a result of which the Members receive, as the consideration in such amalgamation, scheme of arrangement or consolidation, equity securities of a class that (i) has been registered as part of a public offering under the United States securities laws and (ii) is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (or such other principal stock exchange or automated quotation system on which the shares of the Company or TP Re are then traded);
Investment Manager
the Person appointed to manage the assets of TP Re pursuant to an investment management agreement;
Joint Venture and Investment    the Joint Venture and Investment Management Agreement    Management Agreement by and among TP     Re, the Company, Sponsor and Third Point     Advisors LLC, dated as of December 22,     2011






Member
a person registered in the Register of Members as the holder of shares in the Company and, when two or more persons are so registered as joint holders of shares, means the person whose name stands first in the Register of Members as one of such joint holders or all of such persons, as the context so requires;
Notice
written notice as further provided in these Bye-laws unless otherwise specifically stated;
Officer
any person appointed by the Board to hold an office in the Company;
Person
any individual, corporation, association, partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, joint stock or other company, business trust, trust, organization, governmental authority or other entity of any kind;
Qualified Initial Public Offering
(i) a registered public offering or registered public offerings on a national securities exchange of any class of common shares of the Company or TP Re under the United States securities laws, or (ii) any amalgamation, scheme of arrangement or consolidation as a result of which the Members receive, as the consideration in such amalgamation, scheme of arrangement or consolidation, equity securities of a class that (a) has been registered as part of a public offering under the United States securities laws and (b) is publicly traded on a national securities exchange, in either of case (i) or (ii), immediately following which the Company and TP Re together shall have received no less than U.S. $150,000,000;
Register of Directors and Officers
the register of directors and officers referred to in these Bye-laws;
Register of Members
the register of members referred to in these Bye-laws;
Regulatory Authority
any agency, authority, instrumentality, regulatory body, court, central bank or other entity exercising executive, legislative, judicial, taxing, regulatory or administrative functions of or pertaining to government, any securities exchange and any self-regulatory organization;






Resident Representative
any person appointed to act as resident representative and includes any deputy or assistant resident representative;
Secretary
the person appointed to perform any or all of the duties of secretary of the Company and includes any deputy or assistant secretary and any person appointed by the Board to perform any of the duties of the Secretary;
Shares
shall be deemed to include the authorized shares of the Company, and other common shares of the Company and any options, warrants or securities exercisable for, or convertible or redeemable into, common shares of the Company;
Sponsor
Third Point LLC;
Subsidiary
with respect to any Person, means a company, more than fifty percent (50%) (or, in the case of a wholly owned subsidiary, one hundred percent (100%)) of the outstanding voting shares of which are owned, directly or indirectly, by such Person or by one or more other Subsidiaries of such Person, or any such Person and one or more other Subsidiaries;
TP Re
Third Point Reinsurance Company Ltd.;
Trading Day
any day on which the New York Stock Exchange (or such other principal stock exchange or automated quotation system on which the shares of the Company are then traded) is open for trading in securities listed thereon;
Treasury Share
a share of the Company that was or is treated as having been acquired and held by the Company and has been held continuously by the Company since it was so acquired and has not been cancelled;
United States
the United States of America and its dependent territories or any part thereof;
U.S. Person
a “United States person” as defined in Section 957(c) of the Code; and
1.2
In these Bye-laws, where not inconsistent with the context:
(a)
words denoting the plural number include the singular number and vice versa;






(b)
words denoting the masculine gender include the feminine and neuter genders;
(c)
words importing persons include companies, associations or bodies of persons whether corporate or not;
(d)
the words:
(i)
"may" shall be construed as permissive; and
(ii)
"shall" shall be construed as imperative; and
(e)
a reference to statutory provision shall be deemed to include any amendment or re-enactment thereof;
(f)
the word “corporation” means a corporation whether or not a company within the meaning of the Act;
(g)
unless otherwise provided herein, words or expressions defined in the Act shall bear the same meaning in these Bye-laws.
1.3
In these Bye-laws expressions referring to writing or its cognates shall, unless the contrary intention appears, include facsimile, printing, lithography, photography, electronic mail and other modes of representing words in visible form.
1.4
Headings used in these Bye-laws are for convenience only and are not to be used or relied upon in the construction hereof.


SHARES
2.
Power to Issue Shares
2.1
Subject to these Bye-laws and to any resolution of the Members to the contrary, and without prejudice to any special rights previously conferred on the holders of any existing shares or class of shares, the Board shall have the power to issue any unissued shares on such terms and conditions as it may determine and any shares or class of shares may be issued with such preferred, deferred or other special rights or such restrictions, whether in regard to dividend, voting, return of capital, or otherwise as the Company may by resolution of the Members prescribe.
2.2
Subject to the Act, any preference shares may be issued or converted into shares that (at a determinable date or at the option of the Company or the holder) are liable to be redeemed on such terms and in such manner as may be determined by the Board (before the issue or conversion).
3.
Power and Obligation of the Company to Purchase its Shares
3.1
The Company may purchase its own shares for cancellation or acquire them as Treasury Shares in accordance with the Act on such terms as the Board shall think fit.






3.2
The Board may exercise all the powers of the Company to purchase or acquire all or any part of its own shares in accordance with the Act.
3.3
If at any time following the first anniversary of an Initial Public Offering, the average of the Daily Share Price for each Trading Day in the then most recent 12 month period is 90% or less of the Book Value, then the Company shall make an offer to repurchase a number of shares of the Company that, when combined with all prior repurchases pursuant to this Bye-Law 3.3, does not exceed 15% of the sum of (a) the number of shares of the Company outstanding after such repurchase and (b) the aggregate number of shares repurchased, provided that the majority of the Disinterested Board Members may, in its sole discretion, determine not to offer to make such a repurchase. Any offer to repurchase the Repurchase Offer Shares pursuant to Bye-law 3.3 shall be for a price per share determined by the Board, but in no event greater than Book Value.
3.4
No repurchase offer pursuant to Bye-law 3.3 shall be required if such repurchase does not comply with the Act or would result in (i) an adverse ratings action against the Company or TP Re by A.M. Best & Company, or (ii) any adverse action against the Company or TP Re by any Regulatory Authority.
3.5
Subject to the Act, if the Board in its sole discretion determines that ownership of shares of the Company by any Person may result in adverse tax consequences or materially adverse legal or regulatory treatment to the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company or any other Person (including if such consequence arises as a result of any U.S. Person owning Controlled Shares of 9.5%  or more of the value of the Company or the voting shares of the Company after giving effect to any adjustment to voting power required by Bye-law 5), the Company will have the option, but not the obligation, to purchase all or part of the shares of the Company held by such Person to the extent the Board, in the reasonable exercise of its discretion, determines it is necessary to avoid or cure such adverse consequences) for immediately available funds in an amount equal to the Fair Market Value of such shares on the business day immediately prior to the date the Company sends the Repurchase Notice referred to below (the “Repurchase Price”); provided , that the Board will use reasonable efforts to exercise this option equally among similarly situated Persons (to the extent possible under the circumstances). In the event that the Company determines to purchase any such shares, the Company will be entitled to assign its purchase right to a third party or parties, including one or more of the other Persons, with the consent of such assignee. Each Person shall be bound by the determination by the Company to purchase or assign its right to purchase such Person’s shares and, if so required by the Company, shall sell the number of shares of the Company that the Company requires it to sell.
3.6
In the event that the Company or its assignee(s) determines to purchase any such shares, the Company shall provide each Member concerned with written notice of such determination (a “Repurchase Notice”) at least seven (7) calendar days prior to such purchase or such shorter period as each such Member may authorise, specifying the date on which any such shares are to be purchased and the Repurchase Price. The Company may revoke the Repurchase Notice at any time before it (or its assignee(s)) pays for the shares. Neither the Company nor its assignee(s) shall be obligated to give general notice to any Person of any intention to purchase or the conclusion of any purchase of shares of the Company. The closing of any such purchase of shares of the Company shall be no less than seven (7) calendar days after receipt of the Repurchase Notice by the Member, unless such Member agrees to a shorter period, and payment of the Repurchase Price by the Company or its assignee(s) shall be by wire transfer or certified check.






3.7
If the Company purchases any shares pursuant to Bye-laws 3.5 and 3.6, it shall do so only in a manner that the Board believes would not result, upon consummation of such transaction, in any U.S. Person owning Controlled Shares of 9.5% or more of the value of the Company or the voting shares of the Company (after giving effect to any adjustment to voting power required by Bye-law 5). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board, in its sole discretion and by unanimous consent of all of the Directors then in office, may waive the provisions of Bye-laws 3.5 and 3.6.
4.
Rights Attaching to Shares
4.1
At the date these Bye-laws are adopted, the share capital of the Company is divided into two classes: (i) common shares (the “Common Shares”) and (ii) preference shares (the “Preference Shares”).
4.2
The holders of the Common Shares shall, subject to these Bye-laws (including, without limitation, the rights attaching to Preference Shares):
(a)
be entitled to one vote per share;
(b)
be entitled to such dividends as the Board may from time to time declare;
(c)
in the event of a winding-up or dissolution of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary or for the purpose of a reorganisation or otherwise or upon any distribution of capital, be entitled to the surplus assets of the Company; and
(d)
generally be entitled to enjoy all of the rights attaching to shares.
4.3
The Board is authorised to provide for the issuance of the Preference Shares in one or more series, and to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, and to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each series, and to fix the terms, including designation, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of the shares of each such series (and, for the avoidance of doubt, such matters and the issuance of such Preference Shares shall not be deemed to vary the rights attached to the Common Shares or, subject to the terms of any other series of Preference Shares, to vary the rights attached to any other series of Preference Shares). The authority of the Board with respect to each series shall include, but not be limited to, determination of the following:
(a)
the number of shares constituting that series and the distinctive designation of that series;
(b)
the dividend rate on the shares of that series, whether dividends shall be cumulative and, if so, from which date or dates, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of the payment of dividends on shares of that series;
(c)
whether the series shall have voting rights, in addition to the voting rights provided by law and, if so, the terms of such voting rights;
(d)
whether the series shall have conversion or exchange privileges (including, without limitation, conversion into Common Shares) and, if so, the terms and conditions of such conversion or exchange, including provision for adjustment of the conversion or exchange rate in such events as the Board shall determine;






(e)
whether or not the shares of that series shall be redeemable or repurchaseable and, if so, the terms and conditions of such redemption or repurchase, including the manner of selecting shares for redemption or repurchase if less than all shares are to be redeemed or repurchased, the date or dates upon or after which they shall be redeemable or repurchaseable, and the amount per share payable in case of redemption or repurchase, which amount may vary under different conditions and at different redemption or repurchase dates;
(f)
whether that series shall have a sinking fund for the redemption or repurchase of shares of that series and, if so, the terms and amount of such sinking fund;
(g)
the right of the shares of that series to the benefit of conditions and restrictions upon the creation of indebtedness of the Company or any Subsidiary, upon the issue of any additional shares (including additional shares of such series or any other series) and upon the payment of dividends or the making of other distributions on, and the purchase, redemption or other acquisition by the Company or any Subsidiary of any issued shares of the Company;
(h)
the rights of the shares of that series in the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment in respect of shares of that series; and
(i)
any other relative participating, optional or other special rights, qualifications, limitations or restrictions of that series.
4.4
Any Preference Shares of any series which have been redeemed (whether through the operation of a sinking fund or otherwise) or which, if convertible or exchangeable, have been converted into or exchanged for shares of any other class or classes shall have the status of authorised and unissued Preference Shares of the same series and may be reissued as a part of the series of which they were originally a part or may be reclassified and reissued as part of a new series of Preference Shares to be created by resolution or resolutions of the Board or as part of any other series of Preference Shares, all subject to the conditions and the restrictions on issuance set forth in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board providing for the issue of any series of Preference Shares.
4.5
At the discretion of the Board, whether or not in connection with the issuance and sale of any shares or other securities of the Company, the Company may issue securities, contracts, warrants or other instruments evidencing any shares, option rights, securities having conversion or option rights, or obligations on such terms, conditions and other provisions as are fixed by the Board including, without limiting the generality of this authority, conditions that preclude or limit any person or persons owning or offering to acquire a specified number or percentage of the issued Common Shares, other shares, option rights, securities having conversion or option rights, or obligations of the Company or transferee of the person or persons from exercising, converting, transferring or receiving the shares, option rights, securities having conversion or option rights, or obligations.
4.6
All the rights attaching to a Treasury Share shall be suspended and shall not be exercised by the Company while it holds such Treasury Share and, except where required by the Act, all Treasury Shares shall be excluded from the calculation of any percentage or fraction of the share capital, or shares, of the Company.






5.
Adjustment to Voting Power
5.1
If the votes conferred by the Controlled Shares of any Person would otherwise cause such Person or any other Person to be treated as a 9.5% Shareholder with respect to any matter (including, without limitation, election of directors), the votes with respect to such matter conferred by the shares of such Person’s Controlled Group are hereby reduced (and shall be automatically reduced in the future) by whatever amount is necessary so that, after any such reduction, the votes conferred by the Controlled Shares of such Person shall not result in such Person or any other Person being treated as a 9.5% Shareholder with respect to the vote on such matter.
5.2
The reduction in votes pursuant to the preceding Bye-law shall be determined as follows:
(j)
Beginning with the Controlled Group of the Person whose Controlled Shares have the largest number of votes and continuing, as required, with the Controlled Group of each Person whose Controlled Shares successively have a smaller number of votes (after giving effect to prior reductions), the reduction in votes conferred by the shares of a Controlled Group shall be effected proportionately among all the shares of such Controlled Group in accordance with the relative voting power of such shares. Generally, the Board will effectuate the reduction of votes in the manner and order described in the preceding sentence. If varying the order in which votes are reduced would result in a more equitable allocation of the reduction of votes as determined by the Board, the Board shall have the discretion to vary the order in which votes are reduced.  
(k)
If there is a Person whose activities have been determined by the Board to have caused the application of subparagraph (a), after all required reductions in votes conferred on shares of Controlled Groups are effected pursuant to subparagraph (a), (i) the amount of any reduction in the votes of the shares of each Controlled Group effected by application of subparagraph (a) above shall be reallocated within such Controlled Group and conferred on the shares held directly by the Person whose actions have been determined by the Board to have caused the application of such subparagraph and (ii) the voting power of the shares held by each other Person holding shares in such Controlled Group shall be increased by such Person’s proportionate share of such reduction, in each case, to the extent that so doing does not cause any Person to be treated as a 9.5% Shareholder.
5.3
The Board shall implement the foregoing in the manner set forth in this Bye-law 5. In addition to any other provision of this Bye-law 5, any shares shall not carry rights to vote or shall have reduced voting rights to the extent that the Board reasonably determines, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Directors, that it is reasonably necessary that such shares should not carry the right to vote or shall have reduced voting rights in order to avoid adverse tax consequences or materially adverse legal or regulatory treatment to the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company or any Person or its Affiliates; provided that the Board will use reasonable efforts to ensure equal treatment to similarly situated Persons to the extent possible under the circumstances and; provided further that the Board shall reallocate the amount of any reduction in vote in the manner described in Bye-law 5.2(b).
5.4
The Board shall have the authority to request from any Member such information as the Board may reasonably request for the purpose of determining whether any Member’s voting rights are to be adjusted. If any Member fails to respond to such a request, or submits incomplete or inaccurate






information in response to such a request, the Board may in its sole discretion determine that such Member’s shares shall carry no voting rights, in which case such shares shall not carry any voting rights until otherwise determined by the Board in its absolute discretion.
Any Member shall give notice to the Company within ten days following the date that such Member acquires actual knowledge that it or, to the extent practicable, any Person who is a deemed or constructive owner of such Member’s Controlled Shares, is the actual, deemed or constructive owner of Controlled Shares of 9.5% or more of the Company.
The determination by the Board, taking into account any written advice of outside legal counsel which the Board determines to obtain, as to any adjustments to voting power of any share made pursuant to this Bye-law 5 shall be final and binding on all Persons.
6.
Certain Subsidiaries
6.1
Notwithstanding any other provision of these Bye-laws to the contrary, if the Company is required or entitled to vote at a general meeting of any subsidiary of the Company that is not a corporation organized under the laws of the United States or any state (or limited liability company organized under the laws of the United States or any state that is taxable as a corporation for United States Federal income tax purposes) or that is not treated as a pass-through vehicle or disregarded entity for United States federal income tax purposes (unless such disregarded entity owns, directly or indirectly, any subsidiary organized under the laws of a jurisdiction outside the United States that is treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes) (together, the “Designated Companies”), the Board shall refer the subject matter of the vote (other than the removal and remuneration of auditors, the approval of financial statements and reports thereon, and the remuneration of Directors) to the Members of the Company on a poll (subject to Bye-law 5) and seek authority from the Members for the Company's corporate representative or proxy to vote in favour of the resolution proposed by the Designated Company. The Board shall cause the Company's corporate representative or proxy to vote the Company's shares in the Designated Company pro rata to the votes received at the general meeting of the Company, with votes for or against the directing resolution being taken, respectively, as an instruction for the Company's corporate representative or proxy to vote the appropriate proportion of its shares for and the appropriate proportion of its shares against the resolution proposed by the Designated Company. The Board shall have authority to resolve any ambiguity.
6.2
The Board in its discretion shall require that the Bye-laws or Articles of Association or similar organizational documents of each Designated Company shall contain provisions substantially similar to this Bye-law 6. The Company shall enter into agreements, as and when determined by the Board, with each such Designated Company, only if and to the extent reasonably necessary and permitted under applicable law, to effectuate or implement this Bye-law 6.
7.
Special Actions
7.1
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in these Bye-laws, the Company shall not and shall cause TP Re not to subject to Bye-Law 7.2 without the prior and express written consent of each of Daniel S. Loeb, KEP TP Holdings, L.P. and KIA TP Holdings, L.P. (collectively, “Kelso”) and Pine Brook LVR, L.P. (“Pine Brook” and together with Kelso (the “Lead Investors”) and together with Daniel S. Loeb, the “Founders”) enter into any transaction with any (i) Affiliate of the Company, (ii) Member and/or director, officer, employee, and/or Affiliate of any Member, and/or (iii) director, officer, employee, and/or Affiliate of any of the foregoing.






7.2
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in these Bye-Laws, the consent right of each Founder set forth in Bye-Law 7.1 shall survive an Initial Public Offering until such time as such Founder holds shares representing less than 25% of the shares held by such Founder on December 22, 2011.
8.
Calls on Shares
8.1
The Board may make such calls as it thinks fit upon the Members in respect of any moneys (whether in respect of nominal value or premium) unpaid on the shares allotted to or held by such Members (and not made payable at fixed times by the terms and conditions of issue) and, if a call is not paid on or before the day appointed for payment thereof, the Member may at the discretion of the Board be liable to pay the Company interest on the amount of such call at such rate as the Board may determine, from the date when such call was payable up to the actual date of payment. The Board may differentiate between the holders as to the amount of calls to be paid and the times of payment of such calls.
8.2
Any amount which, by the terms of allotment of a share, becomes payable upon issue or at any fixed date, whether on account of the nominal value of the share or by way of premium, shall for the purposes of these Bye-laws be deemed to be an amount on which a call has been duly made and payable on the date on which, by the terms of issue, the same becomes payable, and in case of non-payment all the relevant provisions of these Bye-laws as to payment of interest, costs and expenses, forfeiture or otherwise shall apply as if such amount had become payable by virtue of a duly made and notified call.
8.3
The joint holders of a share shall be jointly and severally liable to pay all calls and any interest, costs and expenses in respect thereof.
8.4
The Company may accept from any Member the whole or a part of the amount remaining unpaid on any shares held by him, although no part of that amount has been called up or become payable.
9.
Forfeiture of Shares
9.1
If any Member fails to pay, on the day appointed for payment thereof, any call pursuant to Bye-law 8 in respect of any share allotted to or held by such Member, the Board may, at any time thereafter during such time as the call remains unpaid, direct the Secretary to forward such Member a notice in writing in the form, or as near thereto as circumstances admit, of the following:
Notice of Liability to Forfeiture for Non-Payment of Call
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. (the "Company")
You have failed to pay the call of [amount of call] made on the [date], in respect of the [number] share(s) [number in figures] standing in your name in the Register of Members of the Company, on the [date], the day appointed for payment of such call. You are hereby notified that unless you pay such call together with interest thereon at the rate of [●] per annum computed from the said [date] at the registered office of the Company the share(s) will be liable to be forfeited.
Dated this [date]








[Signature of Secretary] By Order of the Board
9.2
If the requirements of such notice are not complied with, any such share may at any time thereafter before the payment of such call and the interest due in respect thereof be forfeited by a resolution of the Board to that effect, and such share shall thereupon become the property of the Company and may be disposed of as the Board shall determine. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the disposal may take place by sale, repurchase, redemption or any other method of disposal permitted by and consistent with these Bye-laws and the Act.
9.3
A Member whose share or shares have been so forfeited shall, notwithstanding such forfeiture, be liable to pay to the Company all calls owing on such share or shares at the time of the forfeiture, together with all interest due thereon and any costs and expenses incurred by the Company in connection therewith.
9.4
The Board may accept the surrender of any shares which it is in a position to forfeit on such terms and conditions as may be agreed. Subject to those terms and conditions, a surrendered share shall be treated as if it had been forfeited.
10.
Share Certificates
10.1
Every Member shall be entitled to a certificate under the common seal (or a facsimile thereof) of the Company or bearing the signature (or a facsimile thereof) of a Director or the Secretary or a person expressly authorised to sign specifying the number and, where appropriate, the class of shares held by such Member and whether the same are fully paid up and, if not, specifying the amount paid on such shares. The Board may by resolution determine, either generally or in a particular case, that any or all signatures on certificates may be printed thereon or affixed by mechanical means.
10.2
The Company shall be under no obligation to complete and deliver a share certificate unless specifically called upon to do so by the person to whom the shares have been allotted.
10.3
If any share certificate shall be proved to the satisfaction of the Board to have been worn out, lost, mislaid, or destroyed the Board may cause a new certificate to be issued and request an indemnity for the lost certificate if it sees fit.
10.4
Notwithstanding any provisions of these Bye-laws:
(a)
the Board shall, subject always to the Act and any other applicable laws and regulations and the facilities and requirements of any relevant system concerned, have power to implement any arrangements it may, in its absolute discretion, think fit in relation to the evidencing of title to and transfer of uncertificated shares and to the extent such arrangements are so implemented, no provision of these Bye-laws shall apply or have effect to the extent that it is in any respect inconsistent with the holding or transfer of shares in uncertificated form; and
(b)
unless otherwise determined by the Board and as permitted by the Act and any other applicable laws and regulations including applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange, no person shall be entitled to receive a certificate in respect of any share for so long as the title to that share is evidenced otherwise than by a certificate and






for so long as transfers of that share may be made otherwise than by a written instrument.
11.
Fractional Shares
The Company may issue its shares in fractional denominations and deal with such fractions to the same extent as its whole shares and shares in fractional denominations shall have in proportion to the respective fractions represented thereby all of the rights of whole shares including (but without limiting the generality of the foregoing) the right to vote, to receive dividends and distributions and to participate in a winding-up.
REGISTRATION OF SHARES
12.
Register of Members
12.1
The Board shall cause to be kept in one or more books a Register of Members and shall enter therein the particulars required by the Act.
12.2
The Register of Members shall be open to inspection without charge at the registered office of the Company on every business day, subject to such reasonable restrictions as the Board may impose, so that not less than two hours in each business day be allowed for inspection. The Register of Members may, after notice has been given in accordance with the Act, be closed for any time or times not exceeding in the whole thirty days in each year.
13.
Registered Holder Absolute Owner
The Company shall be entitled to treat the registered holder of any share as the absolute owner thereof and accordingly shall not be bound to recognise any equitable claim or other claim to, or interest in, such share on the part of any other person.
14.
Transfer of Registered Shares
14.1
An instrument of transfer shall be in writing in the form of the following, or as near thereto as circumstances admit, or in such other form as the Board may accept:
Transfer of a Share or Shares
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. (the "Company")
FOR VALUE RECEIVED……………….. [amount], I, [name of transferor] hereby sell, assign and transfer unto [transferee] of [address], [number] shares of the Company.
DATED this [date]
Signed by:            In the presence of:
____________________    __________________
Transferor            Witness







Signed by:            In the presence of:
____________________    ________________
Transferee            Witness
14.2
Such instrument of transfer shall be signed by (or in the case of a party that is a corporation, on behalf of) the transferor and transferee, provided that, in the case of a fully paid share, the Board may accept the instrument signed by or on behalf of the transferor alone. The transferor shall be deemed to remain the holder of such share until the same has been registered as having been transferred to the transferee in the Register of Members.
14.3
The Board may refuse to recognise any instrument of transfer unless it is accompanied by the certificate in respect of the shares to which it relates and by such other evidence as the Board may reasonably require showing the right of the transferor to make the transfer.
14.4
The joint holders of any share may transfer such share to one or more of such joint holders, and the surviving holder or holders of any share previously held by them jointly with a deceased Member may transfer any such share to the executors or administrators of such deceased Member.
14.5
The Board may in its absolute discretion and without assigning any reason therefore refuse to register the transfer of a share which is not fully paid up. The Board shall refuse to register a transfer unless all applicable consents, authorisations and permissions of any governmental body or agency in Bermuda have been obtained. If the Board refuses to register a transfer of any share the Secretary shall, within three months after the date on which the transfer was lodged with the Company, send to the transferor and transferee notice of the refusal.
14.6
Shares may be transferred without a written instrument if transferred by an appointed agent or otherwise in accordance with the Act.
15.
Transmission of Registered Shares
15.1
In the case of the death of a Member, the survivor or survivors where the deceased Member was a joint holder, and the legal personal representatives of the deceased Member where the deceased Member was a sole holder, shall be the only persons recognised by the Company as having any title to the deceased Member's interest in the shares. Nothing herein contained shall release the estate of a deceased joint holder from any liability in respect of any share which had been jointly held by such deceased Member with other persons. Subject to the Act, for the purpose of this Bye-law, legal personal representative means the executor or administrator of a deceased Member or such other person as the Board may, in its absolute discretion, decide as being properly authorised to deal with the shares of a deceased Member.
15.2
Any person becoming entitled to a share in consequence of the death or bankruptcy of any Member may be registered as a Member upon such evidence as the Board may deem sufficient or may elect to nominate some person to be registered as a transferee of such share, and in such case the person becoming entitled shall execute in favour of such nominee an instrument of transfer in writing in the form, or as near thereto as circumstances admit, of the following:






Transfer by a Person Becoming Entitled on Death/Bankruptcy of a Member
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. (the "Company")
I/We, having become entitled in consequence of the [death/bankruptcy] of [name and address of deceased/bankrupt Member] to [number] share(s) standing in the Register of Members of the Company in the name of the said [name of deceased/bankrupt Member] instead of being registered myself/ourselves, elect to have [name of transferee] (the "Transferee") registered as a transferee of such share(s) and I/we do hereby accordingly transfer the said share(s) to the Transferee to hold the same unto the Transferee, his or her executors, administrators and assigns, subject to the conditions on which the same were held at the time of the execution hereof; and the Transferee does hereby agree to take the said share(s) subject to the same conditions.
DATED this [date]
Signed by:            In the presence of:
____________________    __________________
Transferor            Witness

Signed by:            In the presence of:
____________________    ________________
Transferee            Witness
15.3
On the presentation of the foregoing materials to the Board, accompanied by such evidence as the Board may require to prove the title of the transferor, the transferee shall be registered as a Member. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board shall, in any case, have the same right to decline or suspend registration as it would have had in the case of a transfer of the share by that Member before such Member's death or bankruptcy, as the case may be.
15.4
Where two or more persons are registered as joint holders of a share or shares, then in the event of the death of any joint holder or holders the remaining joint holder or holders shall be absolutely entitled to such share or shares and the Company shall recognise no claim in respect of the estate of any joint holder except in the case of the last survivor of such joint holders.
ALTERATION OF SHARE CAPITAL
16.
Power to Alter Capital
16.1
The Company may if authorised by resolution of the Members increase, divide, consolidate, subdivide, change the currency denomination of, diminish or otherwise alter or reduce its share capital in any manner permitted by the Act.
16.2
Where, on any alteration or reduction of share capital, fractions of shares or some other difficulty would arise, the Board may deal with or resolve the same in such manner as it thinks fit.






17.
Variation of Rights Attaching to Shares
If, at any time, the share capital is divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached to any class (unless otherwise provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class) may, whether or not the Company is being wound-up, be varied with the consent in writing of the holders of three-fourths of the issued shares of that class or with the sanction of a resolution passed by a majority of the votes cast at a separate general meeting of the holders of the shares of the class at which meeting the necessary quorum shall be two persons at least holding or representing by proxy one-third of the issued shares of the class. The rights conferred upon the holders of the shares of any class or series issued with preferred or other rights shall not, unless otherwise expressly provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class or series, be deemed to be varied by the creation or issue of further shares ranking pari passu therewith.
DIVIDENDS AND CAPITALISATION
18.
Dividends
18.1
The Board may, subject to these Bye-laws and in accordance with the Act, declare a dividend to be paid to the Members, in proportion to the number of shares held by them, and such dividend may be paid in cash or wholly or partly in specie in which case the Board may fix the value for distribution in specie of any assets. No unpaid dividend shall bear interest as against the Company.
18.2
The Board may fix any date as the record date for determining the Members entitled to receive any dividend.
18.3
The Company may pay dividends in proportion to the amount paid up on each share where a larger amount is paid up on some shares than on others.
18.4
The Board may declare and make such other distributions (in cash or in specie) to the Members as may be lawfully made out of the assets of the Company. No unpaid distribution shall bear interest as against the Company.
19.
Power to Set Aside Profits
The Board may, before declaring a dividend, set aside out of the surplus or profits of the Company, such amount as it thinks proper as a reserve to be used to meet contingencies or for equalising dividends or for any other purpose.
20.
Method of Payment
20.1
Any dividend, interest, or other moneys payable in cash in respect of the shares may be paid by cheque or draft sent through the post directed to the Member at such Member's address in the Register of Members, or to such person and to such address as the holder may in writing direct.
20.2
In the case of joint holders of shares, any dividend, interest or other moneys payable in cash in respect of shares may be paid by cheque or draft sent through the post directed to the address of the holder first named in the Register of Members, or to such person and to such address as the joint holders may in writing direct. If two or more persons are registered as joint holders of any shares any one can give an effectual receipt for any dividend paid in respect of such shares.






20.3
The Board may deduct from the dividends or distributions payable to any Member all moneys due from such Member to the Company on account of calls or otherwise.
20.4
The Company shall be entitled to cease sending dividend cheques and warrants by post or otherwise to a Member if those instruments have been returned undelivered to, or left uncashed by, that Member on at least two consecutive occasions or, following one such occasion, reasonable enquiries have failed to establish the Member’s new address. The entitlement conferred on the Company by this Bye-law in respect of any Member shall cease if the Member claims a dividend or cashes a dividend cheque or warrant.
21.
Capitalisation
21.1
The Board may capitalise any amount for the time being standing to the credit of any of the Company's share premium or other reserve accounts or to the credit of the profit and loss account or otherwise available for distribution by applying such amount in paying up unissued shares to be allotted as fully paid bonus shares pro rata (except in connection with the conversion of shares of one class to shares of another class ) to the Members.
21.2
The Board may capitalise any amount for the time being standing to the credit of a reserve account or amounts otherwise available for dividend or distribution by applying such amounts in paying up in full, partly or nil paid shares of those Members who would have been entitled to such amounts if they were distributed by way of dividend or distribution.
MEETINGS OF MEMBERS
22.
Annual General Meetings
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Act entitling the Members of the Company to elect to dispense with the holding of an annual general meeting , an annual general meeting shall be held in each year (other than the year of incorporation) at such time and place, which shall not be in the United States, as the Chairman (if any) or any two Directors or any Director and the Secretary or the Board shall appoint.
23.
Special General Meetings
The Chairman (if any) or any two Directors or any Director and the Secretary or the Board may convene a special general meeting which shall not be in the United States whenever in their judgment such a meeting is necessary.
24.
Requisitioned General Meetings
The Board shall, on the requisition of Members holding at the date of the deposit of the requisition not less than one-tenth of such of the paid-up share capital of the Company as at the date of the deposit carries the right to vote at general meetings, forthwith proceed to convene a special general meeting and the provisions of the Act shall apply.
25.
Notice
25.1
At least 21 days' notice of an annual general meeting shall be given to each Member entitled to attend and vote thereat, stating the date, place and time which shall not be in the United States at






which the meeting is to be held, that the election of Directors will take place thereat, and as far as practicable, the other business to be conducted at the meeting.
25.2
At least 21 days' notice of a special general meeting shall be given to each Member entitled to attend and vote thereat, stating the date, time, place which shall not be in the United States and the general nature of the business to be considered at the meeting.
25.3
The Board may fix any date as the record date for determining the Members entitled to receive notice of and to vote at any general meeting.
25.4
A general meeting shall, notwithstanding that it is called on shorter notice than that specified in these Bye-laws, be deemed to have been properly called if it is so agreed by (i) all the Members entitled to attend and vote thereat in the case of an annual general meeting; and (ii) by a majority in number of the Members having the right to attend and vote at the meeting, being a majority together holding not less than 95% in nominal value of the shares giving a right to attend and vote thereat in the case of a special general meeting.
25.5
The accidental omission to give notice of a general meeting to, or the non-receipt of a notice of a general meeting by, any person entitled to receive notice shall not invalidate the proceedings at that meeting.
26.
Giving Notice and Access
26.1
A notice may be given by the Company to a Member:
(a)
by delivering it to such Member in person, in which case the notice shall be deemed to have been served upon such delivery; or
(b)
by sending it by letter mail or courier to such Member's address in the Register of Members, in which case the notice shall be deemed to have been served seven days after the date on which it is deposited, with postage prepaid, in the mail; or
(c)
by sending it by courier to such Member’s address in the Register of Members, in which case the notice shall be deemed to have been served two days after the date on which it is deposited, with courier fees paid, with the courier service; or
(d)
by transmitting it by electronic means (including facsimile and electronic mail, but not telephone) in accordance with such directions as may be given by such Member to the Company for such purpose in which case the notice shall be deemed to have been served at the time that it would in the ordinary course be transmitted; or
(e)
by delivering it in accordance with the provisions of the Act pertaining to delivery of electronic records by publication on a website, in which case the notice shall be deemed to have been served at the time when the requirements of the Act in that regard have been met.
26.2
Any notice required to be given to a Member shall, with respect to any shares held jointly by two or more persons, be given to whichever of such persons is named first in the Register of Members and notice so given shall be sufficient notice to all the holders of such shares.






26.3
In proving service under paragraphs 26.1 (b), (c) and (d), it shall be sufficient to prove that the notice was properly addressed and prepaid, if posted or sent by courier, and the time when it was posted, deposited with the courier, or transmitted by electronic means.
27.
Notice of Nominations and Member Business
27.1
Annual General Meetings
(a)
Nominations of persons for election to the Board or the proposal of other business to be transacted by the Members may be made at an annual general meeting only (A) pursuant to the Company’s notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto), (B) by or at the direction of the Board or (C) subject to any applicable law, by Members of record at the time of giving of notice as provided for in this Bye-law 27.1 and who comply with the notice procedures set forth in this Bye-law 27.1;
(b)
For nominations or other business to be properly brought before an annual general meeting by a Member pursuant to clause (C) of Bye-law 27.1(a), the Member must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary and any such proposed business must constitute a proper matter for Member action. To be timely, a Member’s notice shall be delivered to or mailed and received by the Secretary at the registered office of the Company not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual general meeting; provided , that in the event that the date of the annual general meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to such anniversary date or delayed more than 30 days after such anniversary date then to be timely such notice must be received at the registered office of the Company no earlier than 120 days prior to such annual general meeting and no later than the later of 70 days prior to the date of the general meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the general meeting was first made by the Company. In no event shall the public announcement of an adjournment or postponement of an annual general meeting commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a Member’s notice as described above. For purposes of Bye-laws 27.1(b) and 27.2, “public announcement” shall mean disclosure in a press release reported by the Dow Jones News Service, the Associated Press, PR Newswire, Businesswire, Bloomberg or any comparable news service in the United States or in a document publicly filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
(c)
A Member’s notice to the Secretary shall set forth (A) as to each person whom the Member proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected), (B) as to any other business that the Member proposes to bring before the general meeting, a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the general meeting, the text of the proposal or business, the reasons for conducting such business at the general meeting and any material interest in such business of such Member and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made,






and (C) as to the Member giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made:
(i)
the name and address of such Member (as they appear in the Register of Members) and any such beneficial owner;
(ii)
the class or series and number of shares of the Company which are held of record or are beneficially owned by such Member and by any such beneficial owner;
(iii)
a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding between or among such Member and any such beneficial owner, any of their respective affiliates or associates, and any other person or persons (including their names) in connection with the proposal of such nomination or other business;
(iv)
a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding (including, regardless of the form of settlement, any derivative, long or short positions, profit interests, forwards, futures, swaps, options, warrants, convertible securities, share appreciation or similar rights, hedging transactions and borrowed or loaned shares) that has been entered into by or on behalf of, or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding that has been made, the effect or intent of which is to create or mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of, such Member or any such beneficial owner or any such nominee with respect to the Company’s securities (a “Derivative Instrument”);
(v)
to the extent not disclosed pursuant to clause (iv) above, the principal amount of any indebtedness of the Company or any of its subsidiaries beneficially owned by such Member or by any such beneficial owner, together with the title of the instrument under which such indebtedness was issued and a description of any Derivative Instrument entered into by or on behalf of such Member or such beneficial owner relating to the value or payment of any indebtedness of the Company or any such Subsidiary;
(vi)
a representation that the Member is a holder of record of shares of the Company entitled to vote at such general meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the general meeting to bring such nomination or other business before the general meeting; and
(vii)
a representation as to whether such Member or any such beneficial owner intends or is part of a group that intends to (i) deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the voting power of the Company’s outstanding shares required to approve or adopt the proposal or to elect each such nominee and/or (ii) otherwise to solicit proxies from Members in support of such proposal or nomination;
(d)
If requested by the Company, the information required under clauses (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) of Bye-law 27.1(c) shall be supplemented by such Member and any such beneficial owner not later than 10 days after the record date for notice of the general meeting to disclose such information as of such record date;






(e)
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the notice requirements set forth herein with respect to the proposal of any business pursuant to this Bye-law 27.1 other than a nomination shall be deemed satisfied by a Member if such Member has submitted a proposal to the Company in compliance with Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and such Member’s proposal has been included in a proxy statement that has been prepared by the Company to solicit proxies for the general meeting.
27.2
Special General Meetings
(a)
Only such business shall be conducted at a special general meeting as shall have been brought before the general meeting in accordance with the Company’s notice of meeting pursuant to Bye-laws 25 and 26.
(b)
Nominations of persons for election to the Board at a special general meeting may be made (i) by or at the direction of the Board or (ii) provided that the Board has determined that Members may nominate persons for election to the Board at such general meeting, by any Member of the Company who is a Member of record at the time of giving of notice provided for in this Bye-law 27.2(b), who shall be entitled to vote at the general meeting and who complies with the notice procedures set forth in this Bye-law 27.
(c)
For nominations to be properly brought before a special general meeting by a Member pursuant to this Bye-law 27.2(b)(ii), the Member must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary.  To be timely, a Member’s notice shall be delivered to or mailed and received at the registered office of the Company (A) not earlier than 120 days prior to the date of the special general meeting nor (B) later than the later of 90 days prior to the date of the special general meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the special general meeting was first made. 
(d)
A Member’s notice to the Secretary, including any notice of requisition pursuant to Bye-law 24, shall comply with the notice requirements of Bye-law 27.1(c) and (d).
27.3
General
(a)
At the request of the Board, any person nominated by the Board for election as a director shall furnish to the Secretary the information that is required to be set forth in a Member’s notice of nomination pursuant to Bye-law 27.1(c).
(b)
No person shall be eligible to be nominated by a Member to serve as a director of the Company unless nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Bye-law 27.
(c)
The chairman of the general meeting shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare to the general meeting that a nomination was not made in accordance with the procedures prescribed by these Bye-laws or that business was not properly brought before the general meeting, and if he should so determine and declare, the defective






nomination shall be disregarded or such business shall not be transacted, as the case may be.
(d)
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Bye-law 27, unless otherwise required by the Act, if the Member (or a qualified representative of the Member) does not appear at the annual or special general meeting to present a nomination or other proposed business, such nomination shall be disregarded or such proposed business shall not be transacted, as the case may be, notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such vote may have been received by the Company.  For purposes of this Bye-law 27.3, to be considered a qualified representative of the Member, a person must be a duly authorized officer, manager or partner of such Member or must be authorized by a writing executed by such Member or an electronic transmission delivered by such Member to act for such Member as proxy at the general meeting and such person must produce such writing or electronic transmission, or a reliable reproduction of the writing or electronic transmission, at the general meeting.
27.4
Without limiting the foregoing provisions of this Bye-law 27, a Member shall also comply with all applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations thereunder with respect to the matters set forth in this Bye-law 27; provided , that any references in these Bye-laws to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder are not intended to and shall not limit any requirements applicable to nominations or proposals as to any other business to be considered pursuant to this Bye-law, and compliance with Bye-law 27.1 or 27.2 shall be the exclusive means for a Member to make nominations or submit other business (other than as provided in Bye-law 27.1(e)).
28.
Postponement or Cancellation of General Meeting
The Secretary may, and on instruction of the Chairman or president the Secretary shall, postpone or cancel any general meeting called in accordance with these Bye-laws (other than a meeting requisitioned under these Bye-laws) provided that notice of postponement or cancellation is given to the Members before the time for such meeting. Fresh notice of the date, time and place for the postponed or cancelled meeting shall be given to each Member in accordance with these Bye-laws.
29.
Electronic Participation and Security in Meetings
29.1
Members may participate in any general meeting by such telephonic, electronic or other communication facilities or means as permit all persons participating in the meeting to communicate with each other simultaneously and instantaneously, and participation in such a meeting shall constitute presence in person at such meeting.
29.2
The Board may, and at any general meeting, the Chairman of such meeting may, make any arrangement and impose any requirement or restriction it or he considers appropriate to ensure the security of the general meeting including, without limitation, requirements for evidence of identity to be produced by those attending the meeting, the searching of their personal property and the restriction of items that may be taken into the meeting place. The Board and, at any general meeting, the chairman of such meeting are entitled to refuse entry to a person who refuses to comply with any such arrangements, requirements or restrictions.
30.
Quorum at General Meetings






30.1
At any general meeting two or more persons present in person throughout the meeting and representing in person or by proxy in excess of 50% of the total issued voting shares in the Company throughout the meeting shall form a quorum for the transaction of business, provided, however that no Member may participate in any general meeting during which that Member (or, if any Member is an entity, its representative) is physically present in the United States.
30.2
If within half an hour from the time appointed for the meeting a quorum is not present, then, in the case of a meeting convened on a requisition, the meeting shall be deemed cancelled and, in any other case, the meeting shall stand adjourned to the same day one week later, at the same time and place (which shall not be in the United States) or to such other day, time or place (which shall not be in the United States) as the Secretary may determine. Unless the meeting is adjourned to a specific date, time and place (which shall not be in the United States) announced at the meeting being adjourned, fresh notice of the resumption of the meeting shall be given to each Member entitled to attend and vote thereat in accordance with these Bye-laws.
31.
Chairman to Preside at General Meetings
Unless otherwise agreed by a majority of those attending and entitled to vote thereat, the Chairman, if there be one, shall act as chairman of the meeting at all general meetings at which such person is present. In their absence a chairman of the meeting shall be appointed or elected by those present at the meeting and entitled to vote.
32.
Voting on Resolutions
32.1
Subject to the Act and these Bye-laws, any question proposed for the consideration of the Members at any general meeting shall be decided by the affirmative votes of a majority of the votes cast in accordance with these Bye-laws and in the case of an equality of votes the resolution shall fail.
32.2
No Member shall be entitled to vote at a general meeting unless such Member has paid all the calls on all shares held by such Member.
32.3
At any general meeting a resolution put to the vote of the meeting shall, in the first instance, be voted upon by a show of hands and, subject to any rights or restrictions for the time being lawfully attached to any class of shares and subject to these Bye-laws, every Member present in person and every person holding a valid proxy at such meeting shall be entitled to one vote and shall cast such vote by raising his hand.
32.4
In the event that a Member participates in a general meeting by telephone, electronic or other communication facilities or means, the chairman of the meeting shall direct the manner in which such Member may cast his vote on a show of hands.
32.5
At any general meeting if an amendment is proposed to any resolution under consideration and the chairman of the meeting rules on whether or not the proposed amendment is out of order, the proceedings on the substantive resolution shall not be invalidated by any error in such ruling.
32.6
At any general meeting a declaration by the chairman of the meeting that a question proposed for consideration has, on a show of hands, been carried, or carried unanimously, or by a particular majority, or lost, and an entry to that effect in a book containing the minutes of the proceedings of the Company shall, subject to these Bye-laws, be conclusive evidence of that fact.






33.
Power to Demand a Vote on a Poll
33.1
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a poll may be demanded by any of the following persons:
(a)
the chairman of such meeting; or
(b)
at least three Members present in person or represented by proxy; or
(c)
any Member or Members present in person or represented by proxy and holding between them not less than one-tenth of the total voting rights of all the Members having the right to vote at such meeting; or
(d)
any Member or Members present in person or represented by proxy holding shares in the Company conferring the right to vote at such meeting, being shares on which an aggregate sum has been paid up equal to not less than one-tenth of the total amount paid up on all such shares conferring such right.
33.2
Where a poll is demanded, subject to any rights or restrictions for the time being lawfully attached to any class of shares, every person present at such meeting shall have one vote for each share of which such person is the holder or for which such person holds a proxy and such vote shall be counted by ballot as described herein, or in the case of a general meeting at which one or more Members are present by telephone, electronic or other communication facilities or means, in such manner as the chairman of the meeting may direct and the result of such poll shall be deemed to be the resolution of the meeting at which the poll was demanded and shall replace any previous resolution upon the same matter which has been the subject of a show of hands. A person entitled to more than one vote need not use all his votes or cast all the votes he uses in the same way.
33.3
A poll demanded for the purpose of electing a chairman of the meeting or on a question of adjournment shall be taken forthwith. A poll demanded on any other question shall be taken at such time and in such manner during such meeting as the chairman (or acting chairman) of the meeting may direct. Any business other than that upon which a poll has been demanded may be conducted pending the taking of the poll.
33.4
Where a vote is taken by poll, each person physically present and entitled to vote shall be furnished with a ballot paper on which such person shall record his vote in such manner as shall be determined at the meeting having regard to the nature of the question on which the vote is taken, and each ballot paper shall be signed or initialled or otherwise marked so as to identify the voter and the registered holder in the case of a proxy. Each person present by telephone, electronic or other communication facilities or means shall cast his vote in such manner as the chairman of the meeting shall direct. At the conclusion of the poll, the ballot papers and votes cast in accordance with such directions shall be examined and counted by a committee of not less than two Members or proxy holders appointed by the chairman of the meeting for the purpose and the result of the poll shall be declared by the chairman of the meeting.
34.
Voting by Joint Holders of Shares
In the case of joint holders, the vote of the senior who tenders a vote (whether in person or by proxy) shall be accepted to the exclusion of the votes of the other joint holders, and for this purpose seniority shall be determined by the order in which the names stand in the Register of Members.






35.
Instrument of Proxy
35.1
An instrument appointing a proxy shall be in writing in substantially the following form or such other form as the chairman of the meeting shall accept:
Proxy
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
(the "Company")
I/We, [insert names here], being a Member of the Company with [number] shares, HEREBY APPOINT [name] of [address] or failing him, [name] of [address] to be my/our proxy to vote for me/us at the meeting of the Members to be held on the [date] and at any adjournment thereof. [Any restrictions on voting to be inserted here.]
Signed this [date]
Member(s)
35.2
The instrument appointing a proxy must be received by the Company at the registered office or at such other place or in such manner as is specified in the notice convening the meeting or in any instrument of proxy sent out by the Company in relation to the meeting at which the person named in the instrument appointing a proxy proposes to vote, and an instrument appointing a proxy which is not received in the manner so prescribed shall be invalid.
35.3
A Member who is the holder of two or more shares may appoint more than one proxy to represent him and vote on his behalf in respect of different shares.
35.4
Subject to Bye-law 34.5, the decision of the chairman of any general meeting as to the validity of any appointment of a proxy shall be final.
35.5
Any Member may irrevocably appoint a proxy and in such case: (i) such appointment shall be irrevocable in accordance with the terms of the instrument of appointment; (ii) the Company shall be given notice of the appointment, such notice to include the name, address, telephone number and electronic mail address of the proxy, and the Company shall give to such proxy notice of all meetings of shareholders of the Company; (iii) such proxy shall be the only person entitled to vote the relevant Shares at any meeting at which such proxy is present; and (iv) the Company shall be obliged to recognise the proxy until such time as such proxy shall notify the Company in writing that the appointment of such proxy is no longer in force.
36.
Representation of Corporate Member
36.1
A corporation which is a Member may, by written instrument, authorise such person or persons as it thinks fit to act as its representative at any meeting and any person so authorised shall be entitled to exercise the same powers on behalf of the corporation which such person represents as that corporation could exercise if it were an individual Member, and that Member shall be deemed to be present in person at any such meeting attended by its authorised representative or representatives.
36.2
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the chairman of the meeting may accept such assurances as he thinks fit as to the right of any person to attend and vote at general meetings on behalf of a corporation which is a Member.






37.
Adjournment of General Meeting
37.1
The chairman of a general meeting at which quorum is present may, with the consent of the Members holding a majority of the voting rights of those Members present in person or by proxy (and shall if so directed by Members holding a majority of the voting rights of those Members present in person or by proxy) adjourn the meeting.
37.2
The chairman of a general meeting may may adjourn a meeting to another time and place without the consent or direction of the Members if it appears to him that:
(a)
it is likely to be impractical to hold or continue that meeting because of the number of Members wishing to attend who are not present; or
(b)
The unruly conduct of persons attending the meeting prevents, or is likely to prevent, the orderly continuation of the business of the meeting; or
(c)
An adjournment is otherwise necessary so that the business of the meeting may be properly conducted.
37.3
Unless the meeting is adjourned to a specific date, place and time announced at the meeting being adjourned, fresh notice of the date, place and time for the resumption of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each Member entitled to attend and vote thereat in accordance with these Bye-laws.
38.
Written Resolutions
38.1
Subject to these Bye-laws, anything which may be done by resolution of the Company in general meeting or by resolution of a meeting of any class of the Members may be done without a meeting by written resolution signed by or, in the case of a Member that is a corporation whether or not a company within the meaning of the Act, on behalf of all the Members who at the date of the resolution would be entitled to attend the meeting and vote on the resolution.
38.2
Notice of a written resolution shall be given, and a copy of the resolution shall be circulated, to all Members who would be entitled to attend a meeting and vote thereon. The accidental omission to give notice to, or the non-receipt of a notice by, any Member does not invalidate the passing of a resolution.
38.3
A written resolution is passed when it is signed by, or in the case of a Member that is a corporation, on behalf of, the Members who at the date that the notice is given represent such majority of votes as would be required if the resolution was voted on at a meeting of Members at which all Members entitled to attend and vote thereat were present and voting.
38.4
A resolution in writing may be signed in any number of counterparts.
38.5
A resolution in writing made in accordance with this Bye-law is as valid as if it had been passed by the Company in general meeting or by a meeting of the relevant class of Members, as the case may be, and any reference in any Bye-law to a meeting at which a resolution is passed or to Members voting in favour of a resolution shall be construed accordingly.
38.6
A resolution in writing made in accordance with this Bye-law shall constitute minutes for the purposes of the Act.






38.7
This Bye-law shall not apply to:
(a)
(a)    a resolution passed to remove an Auditor from office before the expiration of his term of office; or
(b)
(b)    a resolution passed for the purpose of removing a Director before the expiration of his term of office.
38.8
For the purposes of this Bye-law, the effective date of the resolution is the date when the resolution is signed by, or in the case of a Member that is a corporation, on behalf of, the last Member whose signature results in the necessary voting majority being achieved and any reference in any Bye-law to the date of passing of a resolution is, in relation to a resolution made in accordance with this Bye-law, a reference to such date.
38.9
This Bye-law 38 shall no longer apply or have effect from and after the Effective Date, and, from and after the Effective Date, no resolution of the Company may be adopted by written resolution.
39.
Directors Attendance at General Meetings
The Directors shall be entitled to receive notice of, attend and be heard at any general meeting.

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
40.
Election of Directors
40.1
Only persons who are proposed or nominated in accordance with Bye-law 27 shall be eligible for election as Directors.
40.2
Where persons are validly proposed for re-election or election as a Director, the persons receiving the most votes (up to the number of Directors to be elected) shall be elected as Directors, and an absolute majority of the votes cast shall not be a prerequisite to the election of such Directors.
40.3
For so long as a Lead Investor holds Shares representing at least 25% of the total number of Shares held by such Lead Investor on December 22, 2011, such Lead Investor shall have the right to appoint one Class III director to the Board of Directors of the Company at each annual general meeting at which the term of such Lead Investor’s appointee expires.
40.4
At any general meeting the Members may authorise the Board to fill any vacancy in their number left unfilled at a general meeting.
41.
Number of Directors
The Board shall consist of not less than seven Directors or such number in excess thereof as the Board may from time to time determine.
42.
Term of Office of Directors






42.1
The Directors shall be classified with respect to the time for which they severally hold office, into three classes, as nearly equal in number as possible, one class (“Class I”) whose initial term expires at the 2014 annual general meeting of the Members will be elected for a three year term, another class (“Class II”) whose initial term expires at the 2015 annual general meeting of the Members will be elected for a three year term, and another class (“Class III”) whose initial term expires at the 2016 annual general meeting of the Members will be elected for a three year term, with each class to hold office until its successors are elected and qualified.
42.2
At each annual general meeting of the Members, the successors of the class of directors whose term expires at such meeting shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the annual meeting of Members held in (i) with respect to the Class I directors, the third year following the year of their appointment, (ii) with respect to the Class II directors, the third year following the year of their appointment and (iii) with respect to the Class III directors, the third year following the year of their appointment.
43.
Alternate Directors; Board Observers
43.1
At any general meeting, the Members may elect a person or persons to act as a Director in the alternative to any one or more Directors or may authorise the Board to appoint such Alternate Directors.
43.2
Unless the Members otherwise resolve, any Director may appoint a person or persons to act as a Director in the alternative to himself by notice deposited with the Secretary. Any person so elected or appointed shall have all the rights and powers of the Director or Directors for whom such person is elected or appointed in the alternative provided that such person shall not be counted more than once in determining whether or not a quorum is present.
43.3
An Alternate Director shall be entitled to receive notice of all Board meetings and to attend and vote at any such meeting at which a Director for whom such Alternate Director was appointed in the alternative is not personally present and generally to perform at such meeting all the functions of such Director for whom such Alternate Director was appointed.
43.4
An Alternate Director shall cease to be such if the Director for whom he was appointed to act as a Director in the alternative ceases for any reason to be a Director, but he may be re-appointed by the Board as an alternate to the person appointed to fill the vacancy in accordance with these Bye-laws.
43.5
The Company shall permit one representative of each of Daniel S. Loeb, Kelso, Pine Brook and P RE Opportunities Ltd. (“PROL”) (but only for so long as Daniel S. Loeb, Kelso, Pine Brook or PROL, as applicable, hold Shares) to attend all meetings of the Board of Directors as observers, and shall provide such person with such notice and other information with respect to such meetings as are delivered to the directors of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company (i) may condition the right of any such person to attend meetings of the Board of Directors and receive notice and other information with respect to such meetings on the execution of a confidentiality agreement reasonably satisfactory to the Company, and (ii) may prevent such person from attending a meeting of the Board of Directors (or portion thereof) or receiving certain information with respect thereto if the Company believes, after consultation with counsel, that it is necessary to do so to ensure preservation of the attorney-client privilege.
44.
Removal of Directors







44.1
From the date of the adoption of these Bye-laws until the Effective Date, subject to any provision to the contrary in these Bye-laws, the Members holding a majority of the voting shares of the Company may, at any special general meeting convened and held in accordance with these Bye-laws, by the affirmative vote of all such Members, remove a Director, provided that the notice of any such meeting convened for the purpose of removing a Director shall contain a statement of the intention so to do and be served on such Director not less than 14 days before the meeting and at such meeting the Director shall be entitled to be heard on the motion for such Director's removal.
44.2
From the Effective Date, subject to any provision to the contrary in these Bye-laws, the Members holding a majority of the voting shares of the Company may, at any special general meeting convened and held in accordance with these Bye-laws, by the affirmative vote of all such Members, remove a Director only with cause, provided that the notice of any such meeting convened for the purpose of removing a Director shall contain a statement of the intention so to do and be served on such Director not less than 14 days before the meeting and at such meeting the Director shall be entitled to be heard on the motion for such Director's removal.
44.3
If a Director is removed from the Board under this Bye-law the Members may fill the vacancy at the meeting at which such Director is removed. In the absence of such election or appointment, the Board may fill the vacancy.
44.4
For the purposes of this Bye-law, “cause” shall mean a conviction for a criminal offence involving dishonesty or engaging in conduct which brings the Director or the Company into disrepute and which results in material financial detriment to the Company.
45.
Vacancy in the Office of Director
45.1
The office of Director shall be vacated if the Director:
(a)
is removed from office pursuant to these Bye-laws or is prohibited from being a Director by law;
(b)
is or becomes bankrupt, or makes any arrangement or composition with his creditors generally;
(c)
is or becomes of unsound mind or dies; or
(d)
resigns his office by notice to the Company.
45.2
The Members in general meeting or the Board shall have the power to appoint any person as a Director to fill a vacancy on the Board occurring as a result of the death, disability, disqualification or resignation of any Director and to appoint an Alternate Director to any Director so appointed, provided that in the event the vacancy to be filled is for a Lead Investor’s appointee and such Lead Investor meets the qualifications set forth in Bye-Law 40.3 for its entitlement to appoint a Director, then such Lead Investor shall appoint the Director to fill such vacancy.
46.
Remuneration of Directors
The remuneration (if any) of the Directors shall be determined by the Board of Directors or a committee thereof and shall be deemed to accrue from day to day. The Directors and any board






observers appointed pursuant to Bye-law 43.5 will also be paid all travel, hotel and other expenses properly incurred by them in attending and returning from the Board meetings, any committee appointed by the Board, general meetings, or in connection with the business of the Company or their duties as Directors generally.
47.
Defect in Appointment
All acts done in good faith by the Board, any Director, a member of a committee appointed by the Board, any person to whom the Board may have delegated any of its powers, or any person acting as a Director shall, notwithstanding that it be afterwards discovered that there was some defect in the appointment of any Director or person acting as aforesaid, or that he was, or any of them were, disqualified, be as valid as if every such person had been duly appointed and was qualified to be a Director or act in the relevant capacity.
48.
Directors to Manage Business
The business of the Company shall be managed and conducted by the Board. In managing the business of the Company, the Board may exercise all such powers of the Company as are not, by the Act or by these Bye-laws, required to be exercised by the Company in general meeting.
49.
Powers of the Board of Directors
The Board may:
(a)
appoint, suspend, or remove any manager, secretary, clerk, agent or employee of the Company and may fix their remuneration and determine their duties;
(b)
exercise all the powers of the Company to borrow money and to mortgage or charge or otherwise grant a security interest in its undertaking, property and uncalled capital, or any part thereof, and may issue debentures, debenture stock and other securities whether outright or as security for any debt, liability or obligation of the Company or any third party;
(c)
appoint one or more Directors to the office of managing director or chief executive office of the Company, who shall, subject to the control of the Board, supervise and administer all of the general business and affairs of the Company;
(d)
appoint a person to act as manager of the Company's day-to-day business and may entrust to and confer upon such manager such powers and duties as it deems appropriate for the transaction or conduct of such business;
(e)
by power of attorney, appoint any company, firm, person or body of persons, whether nominated directly or indirectly by the Board, to be an attorney of the Company for such purposes and with such powers, authorities and discretions (not exceeding those vested in or exercisable by the Board) and for such period and subject to such conditions as it may think fit and any such power of attorney may contain such provisions for the protection and convenience of persons dealing with any such attorney as the Board may think fit and may also authorise any such attorney to sub-delegate all or any of the powers, authorities and discretions so vested in the attorney;






(f)
procure that the Company pays all expenses incurred in promoting and incorporating the Company;
(g)
delegate any of its powers (including the power to sub-delegate) to a committee of one or more persons appointed by the Board which may consist partly or entirely of non-Directors, provided that every such committee shall conform to such directions as the Board shall impose on them and provided further that the meetings and proceedings of any such committee shall be governed by the provisions of these Bye-laws regulating the meetings and proceedings of the Board, so far as the same are applicable and are not superseded by directions imposed by the Board;
(h)
delegate any of its powers (including the power to sub-delegate) to any person on such terms and in such manner as the Board may see fit;
(i)
present any petition and make any application in connection with the liquidation or reorganisation of the Company;
(j)
in connection with the issue of any share, pay such commission and brokerage as may be permitted by law; and
(k)
authorise any company, firm, person or body of persons to act on behalf of the Company for any specific purpose and in connection therewith to execute any deed, agreement, document or instrument on behalf of the Company.
50.
[ Intentionally Omitted ]
51.
Register of Directors and Officers
The Board shall cause to be kept in one or more books at the registered office of the Company a Register of Directors and Officers and shall enter therein the particulars required by the Act.
52.
Appointment of Officers
The Board may appoint such Officers (who may or may not be Directors) as the Board may determine for such terms as the Board deems fit.
53.
Appointment of Secretary
The Secretary shall be appointed by the Board from time to time for such term as the Board deems fit.
54.
Duties of Officers
The Officers shall have such powers and perform such duties in the management, business and affairs of the Company as may be delegated to them by the Board from time to time.
55.
Remuneration of Officers
The Officers shall receive such remuneration as the Board or a committee thereof may determine.






56.
Conflicts of Interest
56.1
Any Director, or any Director's firm, partner or any company with whom any Director is associated, may act in any capacity for, be employed by or render services to the Company on such terms, including with respect to remuneration, as may be agreed between the parties. Nothing herein contained shall authorise a Director or Director's firm, partner or company to act as Auditor to the Company.
56.2
A Director who is directly or indirectly interested in a contract or proposed contract or arrangement with the Company shall declare the nature of such interest as required by the Act and such Director shall be required to recuse himself from any board meeting at which such contract or arrangement is to be considered.
56.3
Following a declaration being made pursuant to this Bye-law, a Director shall not vote in respect of any contract or proposed contract or arrangement in which such Director is interested, shall not be counted in the quorum for such meeting and shall be required to recuse himself from any discussion, provided that such restrictions shall not apply to the investment management agreement, dated December 22, 2011, by and between the Company, TP Re or any of their respective affiliates (including, without limitation, the Joint Venture and Investment Management Agreement but except as expressly set forth in such Joint Venture and Investment Management Agreement), and the Sponsor, or any of its affiliates, or any amendment, modifications or waivers thereof or any successor agreement thereto. For the avoidance of doubt, no Director shall be considered "interested" with respect to any transactions in which all the Members participate or are offered to participate.
57.
Indemnification and Exculpation of Directors and Officers
57.1
The Directors, Resident Representative, Secretary and other Officers (such term to include any person appointed to any committee by the Board) for the time being acting in relation to any of the affairs of the Company or any Subsidiary thereof and the liquidator or trustees (if any) for the time being acting in relation to any of the affairs of the Company or any Subsidiary thereof and every one of them, and their heirs, executors and administrators, shall be indemnified and secured harmless out of the assets of the Company from and against all actions, costs, charges, losses, damages and expenses which they or any of them, their heirs, executors or administrators, shall or may incur or sustain by or by reason of any act done, concurred in or omitted in or about the execution of their duty, or supposed duty, or in their respective offices or trusts, and none of them shall be answerable for the acts, receipts, neglects or defaults of the others of them or for joining in any receipts for the sake of conformity, or for any bankers or other persons with whom any moneys or effects belonging to the Company shall or may be lodged or deposited for safe custody, or for insufficiency or deficiency of any security upon which any moneys of or belonging to the Company shall be placed out on or invested, or for any other loss, misfortune or damage which may happen in the execution of their respective offices or trusts, or in relation thereto, PROVIDED THAT this indemnity shall not extend to any matter in respect of any fraud, gross negligence or wilful misconduct which may attach to any of the said persons. Each Member agrees to waive any claim or right of action such Member might have, whether individually or by or in the right of the Company, against any Director or Officer on account of any action taken by such Director or Officer, or the failure of such Director or Officer to take any action in the performance of his duties with or for the Company or any Subsidiary thereof, PROVIDED THAT such waiver shall not extend to any matter in respect of any fraud, gross negligence or wilful misconduct which may attach to such Director or Officer.






57.2
The Company may purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of any Director or Officer against any liability incurred by him under the Act in his capacity as a Director or Officer or indemnifying such Director or Officer in respect of any loss arising or liability attaching to him by virtue of any rule of law in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of which the Director or Officer may be guilty in relation to the Company or any Subsidiary thereof.
57.3
The Company may advance moneys to a Director or Officer for the costs, charges and expenses incurred by the Director or Officer in defending any civil or criminal proceedings against him, on condition that the Director or Officer shall repay the advance if any allegation of fraud or dishonesty is proved against him.
MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
58.
Board Meetings
The Board may meet for the transaction of business, adjourn and otherwise regulate its meetings as it sees fit provided, however, that no Director may participate in any meeting of the Board or committee thereof while physically present in the United States. A resolution put to the vote at a Board meeting shall be carried by the affirmative votes of a majority of the votes cast and in the case of an equality of votes the resolution shall fail.
59.
Notice of Board Meetings
A Director may, and the Secretary on the requisition of a Director shall, at any time summon a Board meeting or a meeting of a committee of the Board. Notice of a Board meeting shall be deemed to be duly given to a Director if it is given to such Director verbally (including in person or by telephone) or otherwise communicated or sent to such Director by post, electronic means or other mode of representing words in a visible form at such Director's last known address or in accordance with any other instructions given by such Director to the Company for this purpose at least 48 hours prior to such Board meeting, unless each Director attends or gives his prior written consent to the meeting being held on such shorter notice.
60.
Electronic Participation in Meetings
Directors may participate in any meeting by such telephonic, electronic or other communication facilities or means as permit all persons participating in the meeting to communicate with each other simultaneously and instantaneously, and participation in such a meeting shall constitute presence in person at such meeting provided, however, that no Director may participate in any meeting of the Board or a committee thereof while physically present in the United States.
61.
Quorum at Board Meetings
The quorum necessary for the transaction of business at a Board meeting shall be a majority of the Directors then in office.
62.
Board to Continue in the Event of Vacancy
The Board may act notwithstanding any vacancy in its number but, if and so long as its number is reduced below the number fixed by these Bye-laws as the quorum necessary for the transaction of






business at Board meetings, the continuing Directors or Director may act for the purpose of (i) summoning a general meeting; or (ii) preserving the assets of the Company.
63.
Chairman to Preside
Unless otherwise agreed by a majority of the Directors attending, the Chairman, if there be one, shall act as chairman at all Board meetings at which such person is present. In his absence a chairman shall be appointed or elected by the Directors present at the meeting.
64.
Written Resolutions
A resolution signed by all the Directors, which may be in counterparts, shall be as valid as if it had been passed at a Board meeting or the applicable committee thereof, duly called and constituted, such resolution to be effective on the date on which the last Director signs the resolution, provided that no such resolution shall be valid unless the last signature of a Director is affixed outside the United States (but, notwithstanding Bye-laws 58 and 60 hereof, a Director who is not the last Director to sign may sign a resolution in writing even though he is in the United States). Such resolution shall be deemed to be adopted as an act of the Board or the applicable committee thereof, at the place where, and at the time when, the last signature of a Director is affixed thereto. For the purposes of this Bye-law only, "the Directors" shall not include an Alternate Director.
65.
Validity of Prior Acts of the Board
No regulation or alteration to these Bye-laws made by the Company in general meeting shall invalidate any prior act of the Board which would have been valid if that regulation or alteration had not been made.
CORPORATE RECORDS
66.
Minutes
The Board shall cause minutes to be duly entered in books provided for the purpose:
(a)
of all elections and appointments of Officers;
(b)
of the names of the Directors present at each Board meeting and of any committee appointed by the Board; and
(c)
of all resolutions and proceedings of general meetings of the Members, Board meetings, meetings of managers and meetings of committees appointed by the Board.
67.
Place Where Corporate Records Kept
Minutes prepared in accordance with the Act and these Bye-laws shall be kept by the Secretary at the registered office of the Company.
68.
Form and Use of Seal






68.1
The Company may adopt a seal in such form as the Board may determine. The Board may adopt one or more duplicate seals for use in or outside Bermuda.
68.2
A seal may, but need not, be affixed to any deed, instrument or document, and if the seal is to be affixed thereto, it shall be attested by the signature of (i) any Director, or (ii) any Officer, or (iii) the Secretary, or (iv) any person authorised by the Board for that purpose.
68.3
A Resident Representative may, but need not, affix the seal of the Company to certify the authenticity of any copies of documents.
ACCOUNTS
69.
Records of Account
69.1
The Board shall cause to be kept proper records of account with respect to all transactions of the Company and in particular with respect to:
(a)
all amounts of money received and expended by the Company and the matters in respect of which the receipt and expenditure relates;
(b)
all sales and purchases of goods by the Company; and
(c)
all assets and liabilities of the Company.
69.2
Such records of account shall be kept at the registered office of the Company, or subject to the Act, at such other place as the Board thinks fit and shall be available for inspection by the Directors during normal business hours.
69.3
Such records of account shall be retained for a minimum period of five years from the date on which they are prepared.
70.
Financial Year End
The financial year end of the Company may be determined by resolution of the Board and failing such resolution shall be 31st December in each year.
AUDITS
71.
Annual Audit
Subject to any rights to waive laying of accounts or appointment of an Auditor pursuant to the Act, the accounts of the Company shall be audited at least once in every year.
72.
Appointment of Auditor
72.1
Subject to the Act, at the annual general meeting or at a subsequent special general meeting in each year, an independent representative of the Members shall be appointed by them as Auditor of the accounts of the Company.






72.2
The Auditor may be a Member but no Director, Officer or employee of the Company shall, during his continuance in office, be eligible to act as an Auditor of the Company.
73.
Remuneration of Auditor
73.1
The remuneration of an Auditor appointed by the Members shall be fixed by the Company in general meeting or in such manner as the Members may determine.
73.2
The remuneration of an Auditor appointed by the Board to fill a casual vacancy in accordance with these Bye-laws shall be fixed by the Board.
74.
Duties of Auditor
74.1
The financial statements provided for by these Bye-laws shall be audited by the Auditor in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. The Auditor shall make a written report thereon in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
74.2
The generally accepted auditing standards referred to in this Bye-law may be those of a country or jurisdiction other than Bermuda or such other generally accepted auditing standards as may be provided for in the Act. If so, the financial statements and the report of the Auditor shall identify the generally accepted auditing standards used.
75.
Access to Records
The Auditor shall at all reasonable times have access to all books kept by the Company and to all accounts and vouchers relating thereto, and the Auditor may call on the Directors or Officers for any information in their possession relating to the books or affairs of the Company.
76.
Financial Statements
76.1
Subject to any rights to waive laying of accounts pursuant to the Act, financial statements, as required by the Act, shall be laid before the Members in a general meeting annually. A resolution in writing made in accordance with Bye-law 37 receiving, accepting, adopting, approving or otherwise acknowledging financial statements shall be deemed to be the laying of such statements before the Members in general meeting.
77.
Distribution of Auditor’s Report
The report of the Auditor shall be submitted to the Members in general meeting.

78.
Vacancy in the Office of Auditor
The Board may fill any casual vacancy in the office of the auditor.
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
79.
Business Combinations
79.1
Any Business Combination with any Interested Shareholder within a period of three years following the time of the transaction in which the person became an Interested Shareholder must be approved






by the Board and authorised at an annual or special general meeting, by the affirmative vote of at least 66.67% of the issued and outstanding voting shares of the Company that are not owned by the Interested Shareholder, unless:

(a)
prior to the time that the person became an Interested Shareholder, the Board approved either the Business Combination or the transaction which resulted in the person becoming an Interested Shareholder; or

(b)
upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the person becoming an Interested Shareholder, the Interested Shareholder owned at least 85% of the number of issued and outstanding voting shares of the Company at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for the purposes of determining the number of shares issued and outstanding those shares owned (i) by persons who are directors and also officers and (ii) employee share plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer.

79.2
The restrictions contained in this Bye-law 79 shall not apply if:

(a)
a Member becomes an Interested Shareholder inadvertently and (i) as soon as practicable divests itself of ownership of sufficient shares so that the Member ceases to be an Interested Shareholder; and (ii) would not, at any time within the three-year period immediately prior to a Business Combination between the Company and such Member, have been an Interested Shareholder but for the inadvertent acquisition of ownership; or

(b)
the Business Combination is proposed prior to the consummation or abandonment of, and subsequent to the earlier of the public announcement or the notice required hereunder of, a proposed transaction which (i) constitutes one of the transactions described in the following sentence; (ii) is with or by a person who either was not an Interested Shareholder during the previous three years or who became an Interested Shareholder with the approval of the Board; and (iii) is approved or not opposed by a majority of the members of the Board then in office who were Directors prior to any person becoming an Interested Shareholder during the previous three years or were recommended for election or elected to succeed such Directors by resolution of the Board approved by a majority of such Directors. The proposed transactions referred to in the preceding sentence are limited to:

(i)
a merger, amalgamation or consolidation of the Company (except an amalgamation in respect of which, pursuant to the Act, no vote of the shareholders of the Company is required);

(ii)
a sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition (in one transaction or a series of transactions), whether as part of a dissolution or otherwise, of assets of the Company or of any entity directly or indirectly wholly-owned or majority-owned by the Company (other than to the Company or any entity directly or indirectly wholly-owned by the Company) having an aggregate market value equal to 50% or more of either






the aggregate market value of all of the assets of the Company determined on a consolidated basis or the aggregate market value of all the issued and outstanding shares of the Company; or

(iii)
a proposed tender or exchange offer for 50% or more of the issued and outstanding voting shares of the Company.

(c)
For the purposes of this Bye-law 79.2 only, the term:

(i)
"affiliate" means a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, another person;

(ii)
“associate," when used to indicate a relationship with any person, means: (i) any company, partnership, unincorporated association or other entity of which such person is a director, officer or partner or is, directly or indirectly, the owner of 20% or more of any class of voting shares; (ii) any trust or other estate in which such person has at least a 20% beneficial interest or as to which such person serves as trustee or in a similar fiduciary capacity; and (iii) any relative or spouse of such person, or any relative of such spouse, who has the same residence as such person;

(iii)
"Business Combination," when used in reference to the Company and any Interested Shareholder of the Company, means:

(a)
any merger, amalgamation or consolidation of the Company or any entity directly or indirectly wholly-owned or majority-owned by the Company, wherever incorporated, with (A) the Interested Shareholder or any of its affiliates, or (B) with any other company, partnership, unincorporated association or other entity if the merger, amalgamation or consolidation is caused by the Interested Shareholder;

(b)
any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition (in one transaction or a series of transactions), except proportionately as a shareholder of the Company, to or with the Interested Shareholder, whether as part of a dissolution or otherwise, of assets of the Company or of any entity directly or indirectly wholly-owned or majority-owned by the Company which assets have an aggregate market value equal to 10% or more of either the aggregate market value of all the assets of the Company determined on a consolidated basis or the aggregate market value of all the issued and outstanding shares of the Company;

(c)
any transaction which results in the issuance or transfer by the Company or by any entity directly or indirectly wholly-owned or majority-owned by the Company of any shares of the Company, or any share of such entity, to the Interested Shareholder, except: (A)






pursuant to the exercise, exchange or conversion of securities exercisable for, exchangeable for or convertible into shares of the Company, or shares of any such entity, which securities were issued and outstanding prior to the time that the Interested Shareholder became such; (B) pursuant to a dividend or distribution paid or made, or the exercise, exchange or conversion of securities exercisable for, exchangeable for or convertible into shares of the Company, or shares of any such entity, which security is distributed, pro rata to all holders of a class or series of shares subsequent to the time the Interested Shareholder became such; (C) pursuant to an exchange offer by the Company to purchase shares made on the same terms to all holders of such shares; or (D) any issuance or transfer of shares by the Company; provided however, that in no case under items (B)-(D) of this subparagraph shall there be an increase in the Interested Shareholder's proportionate share of the any class or series of shares;

(d)
any transaction involving the Company or any entity directly or indirectly wholly-owned or majority-owned by the Company which has the effect, directly or indirectly, of increasing the proportionate share of any class or series of shares, or securities convertible into any class or series of shares of the Company, or shares of any such entity, or securities convertible into such shares, which is owned by the Interested Shareholder, except as a result of immaterial changes due to fractional share adjustments or as a result of any repurchase or redemption of any shares not caused, directly or indirectly, by the Interested Shareholder; or

(e)
any receipt by the Interested Shareholder of the benefit, directly or indirectly (except proportionately as a shareholder of the Company), of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits (other than those expressly permitted in subparagraphs (a)-(d) of this paragraph) provided by or through the Company or any entity directly or indirectly wholly-owned or majority-owned by the Company;

(iv)
“control”, including the terms "controlling," "controlled by" and "under common control with," means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a person, whether through the ownership of voting shares, by contract or otherwise. A person who is the owner of 20% or more of the issued and outstanding voting shares of any company, partnership, unincorporated association or other entity shall be presumed to have control of such entity, in the absence of proof by a preponderance of the evidence to the contrary; provided that notwithstanding the foregoing, such presumption of control shall not apply where such person holds voting shares, in good faith and not for the purpose of circumventing this provision, as an agent, bank, broker, nominee, custodian or trustee for one or more owners who do not individually or as a group have control of such entity;







(v)
"Interested Shareholder" means any person (other than the Company and any entity directly or indirectly wholly-owned or majority-owned by the Company) that (i) is the owner of 15% or more of the issued and outstanding voting shares of the Company, (ii) is an affiliate or associate of the Company and was the owner of 15% or more of the issued and outstanding voting shares of the Company at any time within the three-year period immediately prior to the date on which it is sought to be determined whether such person is an Interested Shareholder or (iii) is an affiliate or associate of any person listed in (i) or (ii) above; provided, however, that the term "Interested Shareholder" shall not include any person whose ownership of shares in excess of the 15% limitation set forth herein is the result of action taken solely by the Company unless such person referred to in this proviso acquires additional voting shares of the Company otherwise than as a result of further corporate action not caused, directly or indirectly, by such person. For the purpose of determining whether a person is an Interested Shareholder, the voting shares of the Company deemed to be issued and outstanding shall include voting shares deemed to be owned by the person through application of paragraph (viii) below, but shall not include any other unissued shares which may be issuable pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding, or upon exercise of conversion rights, warrants or options, or otherwise;

(vi)
"person" means any individual, company, partnership, unincorporated association or other entity;

(vii)
"voting shares" means, with respect to any company, shares of any class or series entitled to vote generally in the election of directors and, with respect to any entity that is not a company, any equity interest entitled to vote generally in the election of the governing body of such entity;

(viii)
"owner," including the terms "own" and "owned," when used with respect to any shares, means a person that individually or with or through any of its affiliates or associates:

(a)
beneficially owns such shares, directly or indirectly; or

(b)
has (A) the right to acquire such shares (whether such right is exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time) pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding, or upon the exercise of conversion rights, exchange rights, warrants or options, or otherwise; provided, however, that a person shall not be deemed the owner of shares tendered pursuant to a tender or exchange offer made by such person or any of such person's affiliates or associates until such tendered shares are accepted for purchase or exchange; or (B) the right to vote such shares pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding; provided, however, that a person shall not be deemed the owner of any shares because of such






person's right to vote such shares if the agreement, arrangement or understanding to vote such shares arises solely from a revocable proxy or consent given in response to a proxy or consent solicitation made to 10 or more persons; or

(c)
has any agreement, arrangement or understanding for the purpose of acquiring, holding, voting (except voting pursuant to a revocable proxy or consent as described in item (B) of subparagraph (b) of this paragraph), or disposing of such shares with any other person that beneficially owns, or whose affiliates or associates beneficially own, directly or indirectly, such shares.

79.3
In respect of any Business Combination to which the restrictions contained in Bye-law 79.1 do not apply but which the Act requires to be approved by the Members, the necessary general meeting quorum and Members’ approval shall be as set out in Bye-laws 30 and 32 respectively.

79.4
The Board shall ensure that the bye-laws or other constitutional documents of each entity wholly-owned or majority-owned by the Company shall contain any provisions necessary to ensure that the intent of Bye-law 79.1, as it relates to the actions of such entities, is achieved.


VOLUNTARY WINDING-UP AND DISSOLUTION

80.
Winding-Up
If the Company shall be wound up the liquidator may, with the sanction of a resolution of the Members, divide amongst the Members in specie or in kind the whole or any part of the assets of the Company (whether they shall consist of property of the same kind or not) and may, for such purpose, set such value as he deems fair upon any property to be divided as aforesaid and may determine how such division shall be carried out as between the Members or different classes of Members. The liquidator may, with the like sanction, vest the whole or any part of such assets in the trustees upon such trusts for the benefit of the Members as the liquidator shall think fit, but so that no Member shall be compelled to accept any shares or other securities or assets whereon there is any liability.
CHANGES TO CONSTITUTION
81.
Changes to Bye-laws
81.1
No Bye-law may be rescinded, altered or amended and no new Bye-law may be made save in accordance with the Act and until the same has been approved by a resolution of the Board and by a resolution of the Members. In addition, no amendment to these Bye-laws which would have a material adverse effect on the rights of Kelso, Pine Brook or Daniel S. Loeb may be made without such party’s consent but only for so long as such party holds a number of Shares equal to at least 25% of the total number of Shares held by such party on December 22, 2011.
81.2
Bye-laws 32, 40, 42.1, 44 and 81 may not be rescinded, altered or amended and no new Bye-law may be made which would have the effect of rescinding, altering or amending the provisions of such Bye-laws, until the same has been approved by a resolution of the Board including the affirmative






vote of not less than 66.67% of the Directors then in office and by a resolution of the Members including the affirmative vote of not less than 66.67% of the votes attaching to all shares in issue.
82.
Changes to the Memorandum of Association
No alteration or amendment to the Memorandum of Association may be made save in accordance with the Act and until same has been approved by a resolution of the Board and, prior to the Effective Date, by a resolution of the Members including the affirmative vote of not less than the majority of the votes attaching to all shares in issue, and, after the Effective Date, by a resolution of the Members including the affirmative vote of not less than 66.67% of the votes attaching to all shares in issue. In addition, no amendment to the Memorandum of Association which would have a material adverse effect on the rights of Kelso, Pine Brook or Daniel S. Loeb may be made without such party’s consent but only for so long as such party holds a number of Shares equal to at least 25% of the total number of Shares held by such party on December 22, 2011.
83.
Discontinuance
The Board may exercise all the powers of the Company to discontinue the Company to a jurisdiction outside Bermuda pursuant to the Act.






 
 
 
FORM NO. 7a
 
Registration No. 45834
BERMUDA
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT OF
MEMORANDUM OF INCREASE OF SHARE CAPITAL

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that a Memorandum of Increase of Share Capital
of
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.

was delivered to the Registrar of Companies on the 7th day of August 2013 in accordance with section 45(3) of the Companies Act 1981 ("the Act").

 
 
 
 
[SEAL]
  
Given under my hand and Seal of the
REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES this
8th  day of August, 2013
  
 
/s/ Illegible
 
  
for Registrar of Companies
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital prior to increase:
US$
15,000,000.00

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of increase:
US$
18,000,000.00

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Present Capital:
US$
33,000,000.00

 
 
 
 



Exhibit 10.29


Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. Director Compensation Policy
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “ Board ”) of Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. (the “ Company ”) has adopted the following compensation policy as of November 6, 2013, for independent directors of the Company and its subsidiaries. The compensation policy has been developed to compensate certain independent directors of the Company for their time, commitment and contributions to the Board and to the boards of director of any subsidiaries of the Company on which they serve. This policy shall apply to directors of the Company who are not employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries and who are not affiliated with KEP TP Holdings, L.P., KIA TP Holdings, L.P., Pine Brook LVR, L.P., Daniel S. Loeb, or any of their respective affiliates (each, an “ Independent Director ”).
1.
Director Compensation .
(a)     Cash Compensation . Independent Directors shall be paid a cash retainer of $100,000 per year (or $117,500, in the case of the chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board), payable quarterly in arrears on or about March 31 st , June 30 th , September 30 th and December 31 st , for each calendar year of service on the Board. Cash retainers for partial years of service shall be pro-rated to reflect the number of days served by an Independent Director during any such year. The first payment made pursuant to this section shall be paid on or around December 31, 2013. Board members will also be entitled to receive reimbursement for reasonable expenses that are incurred in connection with their functions as a director of the Company.
(b)     Equity Based Compensation . Each Independent Director shall receive an annual grant of $100,000 (or $117,500, in the case of the chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board) worth of restricted shares of the Company, calculated based on the fair market value of a common share of the Company, par value US$0.10 per share, on the date on which such restricted shares are granted (the “ Grant Date ”). Each annual restricted share grant shall typically be made on or around the date of the annual meeting of shareholders, except that the first annual grant (the “Initial Grant”) will be made on or about the date this policy is adopted by the Board. Restricted share grants for partial years of service (other than the Initial Grant) shall be pro-rated to reflect the number of days served by an Independent Director during any such year and shall typically be made on or around the date on which the Independent Director begins his or her service on the Board. Such restricted shares will be granted under and subject to the terms and conditions of the Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “ Plan ”) and the applicable award agreement entered into between the Company and the Independent Director, including, without limitation, the vesting and forfeiture provisions contained therein. Generally, such restricted shares shall vest on December 31 of the


 



calendar year in which the grant is made (or, in the case of the Initial Grants, on December 31, 2014), subject to the Independent Director’s continued service on the Board through such vesting date.
2.
This policy may be amended, revised or terminated by the Board at any time and from time to time.
Adopted November 6, 2013

2
 


Exhibit 10.6.1


THE THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
2013 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
DIRECTOR RESTRICTED SHARES
AWARD NOTICE
[director]
[Address]                
[address]                
You have been granted a number of shares of Restricted Shares as set forth below of Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. (the “ Company ”), US$0.10 par value, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “ Plan ”) and the Director Restricted Shares Agreement (together with this Award Notice, the “ Agreement ”). Copies of the Plan and the Restricted Shares Agreement are attached hereto. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings specified in the Plan or the Agreement.
Restricted Shares :
You have been awarded [ ] shares of Restricted Shares of the Company, US$0.10 par value, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 5 of the Director Restricted Shares Agreement.
Grant Date :
[____], 20[__]
Vesting Schedule :
The Restricted Shares shall vest and become exercisable on December 31, 20[__], provided you remain continuously providing services to the Company or one of its Affiliates through such date.
                    


 



Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.

By:_________________________
Name:
Title:


Acknowledgment, Acceptance and Agreement :
By signing below and returning this Award Notice to Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. at the address stated herein, I hereby acknowledge receipt of the Agreement and the Plan, accept the Restricted Shares granted to me and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Award Notice, the Agreement and the Plan.

_____________________________
[director name]                        

______________________________
Date



THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
CHESNEY HOUSE
1ST FLOOR
96 PITTS BAY ROAD
PEMBROKE HM 06
BERMUDA

ATTENTION: GENERAL COUNSEL

2
 



DIRECTOR RESTRICTED SHARES AGREEMENT
DIRECTOR RESTRICTED SHARES AGREEMENT (the “ Agreement ”) dated as of the Grant Date set forth in the Notice of Grant (as defined below), by and between Third Point Reinsurance Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company (the “ Company ”), and the director whose name appears in the Notice of Grant (the “ Participant ”), pursuant to the Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as in effect and as amended from time to time (the “ Plan ”). Capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Plan.
1. Grant of Restricted Shares . The Company hereby evidences and confirms its grant to the Participant, effective as of the Grant Date, of the number of restricted shares of the Company (the “ Restricted Shares ”) specified in the Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan Restricted Shares Grant Notice delivered by the Company to the Participant (the “ Notice of Grant ”). This Agreement is subordinate to, and the terms and conditions of the Restricted Shares granted hereunder are subject to, the terms and conditions of the Plan, which are incorporated by reference herein. If there is any inconsistency between the terms hereof and the terms of the Plan, the terms of the Plan shall govern. The Restricted Shares shall be considered a Service Award under the Plan.
2. Vesting of Restricted Shares; Restricted Period .
(a) Vesting . Except as otherwise provided in this Section 2, the Restricted Shares shall become vested, if at all, on the vesting date(s) set forth in the Notice of Grant (each, a “ Vesting Date ”), subject to the Participant’s continued provision of services to the Company or any Subsidiary thereof through such date. The period over which the Restricted Shares vest is referred to as the “Restricted Period.”
(b) Termination of Services . If a Participant’s services to the Company terminate due to death or Disability, the Restricted Shares shall be deemed vested to the extent of the number of shares of Restricted Shares that would have vested had the Participant’s Service continued until the next Vesting Date immediately following the date of the Participant’s death or the effective date of the Participant’s Termination of Service due to Disability. Any remaining unvested Restricted Shares shall immediately be forfeited and canceled effective as of the date of the Participant’s death or effective date of the Participant’s Termination of Service due to Disability. If the Participant’s services to the Company terminate for any reason other than death or Disability, all unvested Restricted Shares shall immediately be forfeited and

3
 



canceled effective as of the effective date of the Participant’s Termination of Service.
(c) Change in Control . In the event of a Change in Control, then the Restricted Shares shall vest or continue and shall have such treatment, as set forth in the Plan.
(d) Committee Discretion . Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may accelerate the vesting with respect to any Restricted Shares under this Agreement, at such times and upon such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine.
3. Securities Law Compliance . Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Participant may not sell the Restricted Shares that become vested unless such Shares are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “ Securities Act ”), or, if such Shares are not then so registered, such sale would be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. The sale of such Shares must also comply with other applicable laws and regulations governing the Shares and Participant may not sell the Shares if the Company determines that such sale would not be in material compliance with such laws and regulations.
4. Participant’s Rights with Respect to the Restricted Shares .
(a)      Restrictions on Transferability . During the Restricted Period, the Restricted Shares granted hereby are not assignable or transferable, in whole or in part, and may not, directly or indirectly, be offered, transferred, sold, pledged, assigned, alienated, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of or encumbered (including without limitation by gift, operation of law or otherwise) other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution to the estate of the Participant upon the Participant’s death.
(b)      Rights as Sharesholder; Dividends . The Participant shall be the record owner of the Restricted Shares until the Shares are sold or otherwise disposed of, and shall be entitled to all of the rights of a shareholder of the Company including, without limitation, the right to vote such shares and receive all dividends or other distributions paid with respect to such shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any non-cash dividends or other distributions shall be subject to the same restrictions on transferability as the Restricted Shares with respect to which they were paid. If the Participant forfeits any rights he has under this Agreement in accordance with Section 2, the Participant shall, on the date of such forfeiture, no longer have any rights as a

4
 



shareholder with respect to the Restricted Shares and shall no longer be entitled to vote or receive dividends on such Shares.
(c)      Shares Certificates . The Company may issue shares certificates or evidence the Participant’s interest by using a restricted book entry account with the Company’s transfer agent. Physical possession or custody of any shares certificates that are issued shall be retained by the Company until such time as the Restricted Shares vest.
5. Adjustment in Capitalization . The number, class or other terms of any outstanding Restricted Shares shall be adjusted by the Board to reflect any extraordinary dividend, shares dividend, shares split or share combination or any recapitalization, business combination, merger, consolidation, spin-off, exchange of shares, liquidation or dissolution of the Company or other similar transaction affecting the Shares in such manner as it determines in its sole discretion.
6. Miscellaneous .
(a)      Binding Effect; Benefits . This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties to this Agreement and their respective successors and assigns. Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended or shall be construed to give any person other than the parties to this Agreement or their respective successors or assigns any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or in respect of any agreement or any provision contained herein.
(b)      No Right to Continued Services . Nothing in the Plan or this Agreement shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or Shareholders to terminate the Participant’s services at any time, or confer upon the Participant any right to continue in the services of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
(c)      Interpretation . The Committee shall have full power and discretion to construe and interpret the Plan (and any rules and regulations issued thereunder) and this Award. Any determination or interpretation by the Committee under or pursuant to the Plan or this Award shall be final and binding and conclusive on all persons affected hereby.
(d)      Tax Withholding . The Company and its Subsidiaries shall have the right to deduct from all amounts paid to the Participant in cash (whether under the Plan or otherwise) any amount of taxes required by law to be withheld in respect of the Restricted Shares under the Plan as may be necessary in the opinion of the Company to satisfy tax withholding required under the laws of

5
 



any country, state, city or other jurisdiction, including but not limited to income taxes, capital gains taxes, transfer taxes, and social security contributions that are required by law to be withheld. The Company may require the recipient of the Shares to remit to the Company an amount in cash sufficient to satisfy the amount of taxes required to be withheld as a condition to the issuance of shares deliverable to the Participant upon vesting of the Restricted Shares. The Committee may, in its discretion, require the Participant, or permit the Participant to elect, subject to such conditions as the Committee shall impose, to meet such obligations by having the Company sell the least number of whole Shares having a Fair Market Value sufficient to satisfy all or part of the amount required to be withheld. The Company may defer delivery of the Shares until such requirements are satisfied.
(e)      Section 83(b) Election . The Participant may make an election under Code Section 83(b) (a “ Section 83(b) Election ”) with respect to the Restricted Shares. Any such election must be made within thirty (30) days after the Grant Date. If the Participant elects to make a Section 83(b) Election, the Participant shall provide the Company with a copy of an executed version and satisfactory evidence of the filing of the executed Section 83(b) Election with the US Internal Revenue Service. The Participant agrees to assume full responsibility for ensuring that the Section 83(b) Election is actually and timely filed with the US Internal Revenue Service and for all tax consequences resulting from the Section 83(b) Election.
(f)      Forfeiture, Cancellation and “Clawback” of Awards . The Participant shall forfeit and disgorge to the Company any Restricted Shares granted or vested and any gains earned or accrued due to the sale of any Shares to the extent required by Applicable Law or regulations in effect on or after the Effective Date, including Section 304 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 10D of the Exchange Act. For the avoidance of doubt, the Committee shall have full authority to implement any policies and procedures necessary to comply with Section 10D of the Exchange Act and any rules promulgated thereunder. The implementation of policies and procedures pursuant to this Section 6(f) and any modification of the same shall not be subject to any restrictions on amendment or modification of Awards. Awards granted under the Plan (and gains earned or accrued in connection with Awards) shall also be subject to such generally applicable policies as to forfeiture and recoupment (including, without limitation, upon the occurrence of material financial or accounting errors, financial or other misconduct or Competitive Activity) as may be adopted by the Administrator or the Board from time to time and communicated to Participants. Any such policies may (in the discretion of the Administrator or the Board) be applied to

6
 



outstanding Awards at the time of adoption of such policies, or on a prospective basis only.
(g)      Applicable Law . This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of the State of New York regardless of the application of rules of conflict of law that would apply the laws of any other jurisdiction.
(h)      Limitation on Rights; No Right to Future Grants; Extraordinary Item of Compensation . By entering into this Agreement and accepting the Restricted Shares evidenced hereby, the Participant acknowledges: ( a ) that the Plan is discretionary in nature and may be suspended or terminated by the Company at any time; ( b ) that the Award does not create any contractual or other right to receive future grants of Awards; ( c ) that participation in the Plan is voluntary; ( d ) that the value of the Restricted Shares is not part of normal or expected compensation for purposes of calculating any severance, resignation, redundancy, end of service payments, bonuses, long-service awards, pension or retirement benefits or similar payments; and ( e ) that the future value of the Shares is unknown and cannot be predicted with certainty.
(i)      Employee Data Privacy . By entering into this Agreement and accepting the Restricted Shares evidenced hereby, the Participant: ( a ) authorizes the Company, any agent of the Company administering the Plan or providing Plan recordkeeping services, to disclose to the Company or any of its affiliates any information and data the Company requests in order to facilitate the grant of the Award and the administration of the Plan; ( b ) waives any data privacy rights the Participant may have with respect to such information; and ( c ) authorizes the Company and its agents to store and transmit such information in electronic form.
(j)      Consent to Electronic Delivery . By entering into this Agreement and accepting the Restricted Shares evidenced hereby, Participant hereby consents to the delivery of information (including, without limitation, information required to be delivered to the Participant pursuant to applicable securities laws) regarding the Company and the Subsidiaries, the Plan, this Agreement and the Restricted Shares via Company website, email or other electronic delivery.
(k)      Headings and Captions . The section and other headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
(l)      Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

7
 





8
 


Exhibit 10.8.1

Third Point Reinsurance Limited
Director Service Agreement
This DIRECTOR SERVICE AGREEMENT, dated as of November 6, 2013, is entered into by and between Third Point Reinsurance Ltd., a Bermuda corporation (the “ Company ”), and the Director whose name appears on the signature page hereof (the “ Director ”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings given to such terms in Section 6.
WHEREAS, the shareholders of the Company have or the Board has appointed the Director as a member of the Board and the Director has accepted such appointment;
WHEREAS, the Company and the Director desire to enter into an agreement that sets forth the terms and conditions of the Director’s service on the Board; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Appointment and Term . The Director hereby agrees to serve as a member of the Board, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. The appointment of the Director shall [commence on the date hereof and] continue until the [first][second][third] annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company that occurs after the date hereof, unless sooner terminated by either the shareholders of the Company or the Director at any time, provided that if the Director is reelected by the shareholders of the Company at such annual meeting, then the Director’s service pursuant to the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be automatically extended through the end of the term of such election. The period during which the Director provides services pursuant to the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be referred to as the “ Service Period ”. [This Agreement shall amend and replace Sections 1 and 2 of the Director Service Agreement, dated as of [___________], 2012, between the Director and the Company (the “ Prior Service Agreement ”). The Director hereby agrees and acknowledges that the Prior Service Agreement is further amended such that, effective as of the date hereof, ( a ) 40% of each tranche of options granted thereunder (rounded in each case to the nearest whole share) shall be forfeited and cancelled and ( b ) the remaining 60% of each tranche of options granted thereunder shall be fully vested and exercisable.]
2.      Compensation . During the Service Period, in full consideration of the performance by the Director of the Director’s obligations hereunder, the Director shall receive from the Company compensation at an annual rate of not less than

        



$200,000 per year (the “ Compensation ”), payable in accordance with the terms of the Company’s Director Compensation Policy, as in effect from time to time. A copy of the Director Compensation Policy in effect on the date hereof is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The portion of the Compensation paid in the form of an option grant, shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the option agreement attached hereto as Exhibit B.
3.      Reimbursement of Expenses . The Director shall be reimbursed for all proper and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by him or her in preparing for and attending meetings of the Board or any committee of the Board, including meals, lodging, and transportation to and from Board or committee meetings and any other expenditure preapproved by the Company and incurred by the Director in the proper performance of his or her duties.
4.      Interpretation; Construction . Any determination or interpretation by the Committee under or pursuant to this Agreement shall be final and conclusive on all persons affected hereby.
5.      Modifications and Waivers . No provision of this Agreement may be modified, altered or amended except by an instrument in writing executed by the parties hereto. No waiver by any party hereto of any breach by any other party hereto of any provision of this Agreement to be performed by such other party shall be deemed a waiver of similar or dissimilar provisions at the time or at any prior or subsequent time.
6.      Definitions . Whenever used herein, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set forth below:
Agreement ” means this Director Service Agreement, as the same may be amended, modified, supplemented, or restated from time to time after the date hereof.
Board ” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
Code ” means the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Company ” shall have the meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.
Committee ” means the Compensation Committee of the Board or, if there shall not be any committee then serving, the Board.
Director ” shall have the meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.

2




Subsidiary ” means any corporation a majority of whose outstanding voting securities is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company.
7.      Miscellaneous .
(a)      Notices . All notices, requests, demands, letters, waivers, and other communications required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if ( i ) delivered personally, ( ii ) mailed, certified or registered mail with postage prepaid, ( iii ) sent by next-day or overnight mail or delivery, or ( iv ) sent by fax, as follows:
(i)      If to the Company, to it at:
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
Chesney House
1st Floor
96 Pitts Bay Road
Pembroke HM 06
Bermuda
Attn: General Counsel
(ii)      If to the Director, to the Director’s last known home address, or to such other person or address as any party shall specify by notice in writing to the Company.

All such notices, requests, demands, letters, waivers, and other communications shall be deemed to have been received ( w ) if by personal delivery on the day after such delivery, ( x ) if by certified or registered mail, on the fifth business day after the mailing thereof, ( y ) if by next-day or overnight mail or delivery, on the day delivered, or ( z ) if by fax, on the day delivered, provided that such delivery is confirmed.
(b)      Binding Effect; Benefits . This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties to this Agreement and their respective successors and assigns. Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended or shall be construed to give any person other than the parties to this Agreement or their respective successors or assigns any legal or equitable right, remedy, or claim under or in respect of any agreement or any provision contained herein.
(c)      Waiver . Either party hereto may by written notice to the other ( i ) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other actions of the other under this Agreement, ( ii ) waive compliance with any of the conditions or

3




covenants of the other contained in this Agreement, and ( iii ) waive or modify performance of any of the obligations of the other under this Agreement. Except as provided in the preceding sentence, no action taken pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, any investigation by or on behalf of either party, shall be deemed to constitute a waiver by the party taking such action of compliance with any representations, warranties, covenants, or agreements contained herein. The waiver by either party hereto of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any preceding or succeeding breach and no failure by either party to exercise any right or privilege hereunder shall be deemed a waiver of such party’s rights or privileges hereunder or shall be deemed a waiver of such party’s rights to exercise the same at any subsequent time or times hereunder, subject to the requirements of law.
(d)      No Right to Nomination for Reelection . Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to confer on the Director any right to be nominated for reelection to the Board, or to interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board to determine nominations for Board service.
(e)      Applicable Law . This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, regardless of the law that might be applied under principles of conflict of laws. Each party hereby irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal and state courts of New York State located in New York County in respect of the interpretation and enforcement of the provisions of this Agreement. Each party hereby waives and agrees not to assert, as a defense in any action, suit or proceeding for the interpretation and enforcement hereof, that such action, suit or proceeding may not be brought or is not maintainable in such courts or that the venue thereof may not be appropriate or that this Agreement may not be enforced in or by such courts. Each party hereby consents to and grants any such court jurisdiction over the person of such parties and over the subject matter of any such action, suit or proceeding and agrees that the mailing of process or other papers in connection with any such action, suit or proceeding in the manner provided in Section 7(a) or in such other manner as may be permitted by law shall be valid and sufficient service thereof. EACH PARTY FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT ANY CONTROVERSY WHICH MAY ARISE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS LIKELY TO INVOLVE COMPLICATED AND DIFFICULT ISSUES, AND THEREFORE EACH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT SUCH PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, OR THE BREACH, TERMINATION, OR VALIDITY OF THIS AGREEMENT. Each party certifies and acknowledges that ( A ) no representative, agent or attorney of any other party has represented, expressly or otherwise, that such other party would not, in the event of

4




litigation, seek to enforce the foregoing waiver, ( B ) each such party understands and has considered the implications of this waiver, ( C ) each such party makes this waiver voluntarily, and ( D ) each such party has been induced to enter into this Agreement by, among other things, the mutual waivers and certifications in this Section 7(d).
(f)      Section 409A of the Code . This Agreement is intended to be exempt from or comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and all provisions contained herein, including, but not limited to, any adjustment provisions, shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with such intent.
(g)      Section and Other Headings . The section and other headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
(h)      Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument.
[ Signature Page Follows ]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Director have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.
THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
By:

Name:
Title:
DIRECTOR
__________________________________________
[Director Name]




5



Exhibit 10.28.1
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
Schedule of Signatories to the Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement

John R. Berger
J. Robert Bredahl
Christopher S. Coleman
Christopher L. Collins
Steve Elliot Fass
Rafe de la Gueronniere
Manoj K. Gupta
Mary R. Hennessy
Daniel V. Malloy
Tonya L. Marshall
Neil McConachie
Michael McKnight
Mark Parkin
William L. Spiegel
Joshua L. Targoff
Anthony Urban



Exhibit 21.1
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
List of Subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
Subsidiary
 
Jurisdiction of Incorporation/Formation
 
 
Third Point Reinsurance Company Ltd.
 
Bermuda
Third Point Re Marketing (UK) Ltd.
 
United Kingdom
Third Point Reinsurance Investment Management Ltd. (1)
 
Bermuda
Third Point Re Cat Ltd. (2)
 
Bermuda
Third Point Reinsurance Opportunities Fund Ltd. (3)
 
Bermuda
 

(1)
Owned 85% by Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. and 15% by Hiscox Insurance Company (Bermuda) Limited.
 
(2)
100% of common shares held by Third Point Reinsurance Opportunities Fund Ltd.
 
(3)
100% of voting shares held by Third Point Reinsurance Investment Management Ltd. Non-voting equity shares held by various investors. As of December 31, 2013, Third Point Reinsurance Company Ltd. had an investment commitment to the Third Point Reinsurance Opportunities Fund Ltd. of $50 million, out of total commitments of $94.7 million.



Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-190724) pertaining to the Third Point Reinsurance Limited Share Incentive Plan and the Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan of Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. of our report dated February 27, 2014, with respect to the financial statements and financial statement schedules of Third Point Reinsurance Ltd., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2013.


/s/ Ernst & Young Ltd.
Hamilton, Bermuda
February 27, 2014




Exhibit 24.1

THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
Power of Attorney
WHEREAS, THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD., a Bermuda exempted company (the “ Company ”), intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “ Commission ”) pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations of the Commission promulgated thereunder, its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, together with any and all exhibits, documents and other instruments and documents necessary, advisable or appropriate in connection therewith, including any amendments thereto (the “ Form 10-K ”);
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Christopher S. Coleman and Tonya L. Marshall, and each of them severally, his or her true and lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power to act with or without the others and with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to execute in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, the Form 10-K and any or all amendments to the Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents and each of them full power and authority, to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, to all intents and purposes and as fully as they might or could do in person, hereby ratifying, approving and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or their substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney on and as the date set forth below



 


Signature
Title
Date
/s/ Christopher L. Collins
Christopher L. Collins
Director
February 25, 2014
/s/ Steven E. Fass
Steven E. Fass
Director
February 25, 2014
/s/ Rafe de la Gueronniere
Rafe de la Gueronniere
Director
February 25, 2014
/s/ Mary R. Hennessy
Mary R. Hennessy
Director
February 25, 2014
/s/ Neil McConachie
Neil McConachie
Director
February 25, 2014
/s/ Mark Parkin
Mark Parkin
Director
February 25, 2014
/s/ William Spiegel
William Spiegel
Director
February 25, 2014
/s/ Joshua L. Targoff
Joshua L. Targoff
Director
February 25, 2014
 

2
 


Exhibit 31.1
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT, AS AMENDED,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, John R. Berger, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual on Form 10-K of Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Not applicable;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 27, 2014






/s/ John R. Berger
 
John R. Berger
 
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Underwriting Officer
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 







Exhibit 31.2
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT, AS AMENDED,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, J. Robert Bredahl, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual on Form 10-K of Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Not applicable;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 27, 2014






/s/ J. Robert Bredahl
 
J. Robert Bredahl
 
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
 
(Principal Financial Officer)
 






Exhibit 32.1
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, John R. Berger, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
(1)
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: February 27, 2014

/s/ John R. Berger
 
John R. Berger
 
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Underwriting Officer
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 





Exhibit 32.2
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, J. Robert Bredahl, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
(1)
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: February 27, 2014

/s/ J. Robert Bredahl
 
J. Robert Bredahl
 
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
 
(Principal Financial Officer)