UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
|
FORM 10-K
|
|
x
|
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017
|
Commission file number 1-32349
|
SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bermuda
|
|
Not Applicable
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
Clarendon House
2 Church Street
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
(441) 296 5872
(Address and telephone number including area code of principal executive offices)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on which Registered
|
|
Common Shares of $0.18 each
|
|
The New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
|
|
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every interactive data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best of Registrant’s knowledge in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨
Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
¨
No
x
The aggregate market value of voting common shares held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (based upon the closing sales price quoted on the New York Stock Exchange) as of
July 29, 2016
was
$6,638,040,057
.
Number of common shares outstanding on
March 10, 2017
:
68,300,375
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The Registrant will incorporate by reference information required in response to Part III, Items 10-14, from its definitive proxy statement for its annual meeting of shareholders, to be held on
June 28, 2017
.
1
SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED
FISCAL
2017
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE
|
|
|
|
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
PART I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
ITEM 1.
|
|
BUSINESS
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1A.
|
|
RISK FACTORS
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
|
PROPERTIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
|
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
ITEM 5.
|
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
|
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
ITEM 10.
|
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
ITEM 15.
|
|
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 16.
|
|
FORM 10-K SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
|
2
REFERENCES
Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “Signet” or the “Company,” refer to Signet Jewelers Limited (and before September 11, 2008 to Signet Group plc) and its consolidated subsidiaries. References to the “Parent Company” are to Signet Jewelers Limited.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
All references to “dollars,” “US dollars,” “$,” “cents” and “c” are to the lawful currency of the United States of America. Signet prepares its financial statements in US dollars. All references to “British pound,” “pounds,” “British pounds,” “£,” “pence” and “p” are to the lawful currency of the United Kingdom. All references to “Canadian dollar” or “C$” are to the lawful currency of Canada.
Percentages in tables have been rounded and accordingly may not add up to 100%. Certain financial data may have been rounded. As a result of such rounding, the totals of data presented in this document may vary slightly from the actual arithmetical totals of such data.
Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, financial data has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). However, Signet gives certain additional non-GAAP measures in order to provide increased insight into the underlying or relative performance of the business. An explanation of each non-GAAP measure used can be found in Item 6.
Fiscal year and fourth quarter
Signet’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to January 31. As used herein, “Fiscal 2018,” “Fiscal 2017,” “Fiscal 2016,” “Fiscal 2015,” “Fiscal 2014,” and “Fiscal 2013” refer to the 53 week period ending February 3, 2018, the 52 week periods ending January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, February 1, 2014, and the 53 week period ending February 2, 2013, respectively. Fourth quarter references the 13 weeks ended January 28, 2017 (“fourth quarter”) and the 13 weeks ended January 30, 2016 (“prior year fourth quarter”).
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements which are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, based upon management’s beliefs and expectations as well as on assumptions made by and data currently available to management, appear in a number of places throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K and include statements regarding, among other things, Signet’s results of operation, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth, strategies and the industry in which Signet operates. The use of the words “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “believes,” “should,” “potential,” “may,” “forecast,” “objective,” “plan,” or “target,” and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to general economic conditions, regulatory changes following the United Kingdom’s announcement to exit from the European Union, a decline in consumer spending, the merchandising, pricing and inventory policies followed by Signet, the reputation of Signet and its brands, the level of competition in the jewelry sector, the cost and availability of diamonds, gold and other precious metals, regulations relating to customer credit, seasonality of Signet’s business, financial market risks, deterioration in customers’ financial condition, exchange rate fluctuations, changes in Signet’s credit rating, changes in consumer attitudes regarding jewelry, management of social, ethical and environmental risks, the development and maintenance of Signet’s omni-channel retailing, security breaches and other disruptions to Signet’s information technology infrastructure and databases, inadequacy in and disruptions to internal controls and systems, changes in assumptions used in making accounting estimates relating to items such as extended service plans and pensions, risks relating to Signet being a Bermuda corporation, the impact of the acquisition of Zale Corporation on relationships, including with employees, suppliers, customers and competitors, an adverse decision in legal proceedings, and our ability to successfully integrate Zale Corporation’s operations and to realize synergies from the transaction.
For a discussion of these risks and other risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward looking statement, see Item 1A and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Signet undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances, except as required by law.
3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
Signet Jewelers Limited (“Signet” or the “Company”) is the world’s largest retailer of diamond jewelry. Signet is incorporated in Bermuda and its address and telephone number are shown on the cover of this document. The Company, with
3,682
stores and kiosks at January 28, 2017, manages its business by store brand grouping, a description of which follows:
|
•
|
The Sterling Jewelers division is one reportable segment. It operated
1,588
stores in all 50 US states at January 28, 2017. Its stores operate nationally in malls and off-mall locations principally as Kay Jewelers (“Kay”), Kay Jewelers Outlet, Jared The Galleria Of Jewelry (“Jared”) and Jared Vault. The division also operates a variety of mall-based regional brands.
|
|
•
|
The Zale division, which was acquired in May 2014 (see Note 3 of Item 8 for additional information), consists of two reportable segments:
|
|
◦
|
Zale Jewelry, which operated
970
jewelry stores at January 28, 2017, is located primarily in shopping malls in North America. Zale Jewelry includes the US store brand Zales (Zales Jewelers and Zales Outlet), which operates in all 50 US states, and the Canada store brand Peoples Jewellers, which operates in nine provinces. The division also operates the Gordon’s Jewelers and Mappins Jewellers regional brands.
|
|
◦
|
Piercing Pagoda, which operated
616
mall-based kiosks at January 28, 2017, is located in shopping malls in the US and Puerto Rico.
|
|
•
|
The UK Jewelry division is one reportable segment. It operated
508
stores at January 28, 2017. Its stores operate in shopping malls and off-mall locations (i.e. high street) principally as H.Samuel and Ernest Jones.
|
Certain company activities (e.g. diamond sourcing) are managed as a separate operating segment and are aggregated with unallocated corporate administrative functions in the segment “Other” for financial reporting purposes. Signet’s diamond sourcing function includes our diamond polishing factory in Botswana. See Note 4 of Item 8 for additional information regarding the Company’s reportable segments.
MISSION & STRATEGY
Signet’s mission is to help guests “Celebrate Life and Express Love.” Our Vision 2020 and beyond strategy is to be the world’s premier jeweler by relentlessly connecting with customers, earning their trust with every interaction everywhere. Our five strategic pillars all center on a customer first omni-channel experience. These pillars included below define our key priorities and growth focus areas.
|
•
|
Grow in the mid-market
|
|
•
|
Best in bridal
|
|
•
|
Win in fashion and gifting
|
|
•
|
Digital first and data driven
|
|
•
|
People, purpose and passion
|
Growing in the mid-market drives our competitive strengths focused on merchandising, marketing, omni-channel and productivity initiatives. We define the mid-market jewelry sector based on the value of products that consumers purchase. We consider this market to be defined by jewelry purchases with price points ranging from $50 to $10,000, which essentially excludes costume and luxury jewelry categories. The vast majority of Signet’s sales (over 95%) are in this range of price points. This subset of the total US jewelry market is approximately $41 billion or about half the total US market. In pursuit of this strategic pillar, we continuously review our US national store brands performance and have concluded that our customer population has several distinct shopping and purchasing characteristics or customer identities. Consequently, we attempt to grow our share of the mid-market by differentiating customers based on attitudes and behaviors, versus demographic information. This approach to customer segmentation results in distinct customer identities:
|
•
|
The “Sentimentalist” - a seeker of high-quality, timeless jewelry which invokes sentimental value.
|
|
•
|
The “Gifter” - a customer that is not highly knowledgeable of jewelry but purchases for others.
|
|
•
|
The “Influencer” - a customer that uses jewelry to show status and is knowledgeable of brands. The Influencer is a customer focused on both self-purchase and gifting.
|
|
•
|
The “Stylish Shopper” - a customer that wears jewelry often and considers it an essential aspect of fashion.
|
|
•
|
The “Practical Shopper” - a customer that focuses on inexpensive, everyday jewelry.
|
4
Although each of our US national store brand customers share many of these five customer traits, each store brand attracts a heavier weighting of certain types of customers. This customer segmentation approach empowers Signet to define our highest-priority growth opportunities within the mid-market (i.e., where Signet will play), to differentiate and optimize our store brands, including guest experience, merchandise brands and marketing. Our brand discussion included within Item 1 includes alignment of these customer identities with our US national store brands.
Being the best in bridal is an ongoing journey, not a destination. In jewelry, bridal represents the closest thing to a necessity for our customers. We continuously look to develop differentiated bridal jewelry products, increasing targeted marketing programs, delivering the best guest experience by our sales associates, advancing vertical integration in our supply chain and offering credit financing. Additionally, we continue to evolve our best in bridal strategy to target millennials. With this target demographic shifting its marriage pattern to later in life, our focus on gaining market share during these peak spending years to come is key to our best in bridal strategy.
As fashion and behavioral trends evolve, we continue to adapt to ensure our strategies encompass all opportunities to drive profitable growth. Excellence in bridal categories is a mainstay in our success, however we have sharpened focus on fashion jewelry and gift merchandise to capture growing opportunities within demographic groups such as millennials. We believe executing against this strategic pillar will effectively compliment our other strategic pillars, as well as enhance traffic through all channels.
Operating in an evolving retail landscape requires a strategic focus on digital channels and interaction with our guests through a number of media to support our strategic pillar of “Digital First and Data Driven.” Our omni-channel approach to educating, selling and serving of customers is uniquely important in jewelry retail because the purchase of jewelry is personal, intimate and typically viewed as an important experience. The Internet often represents the first interaction a customer or prospective guest will have with us when a jewelry-buying occasion arises. As trust is the most important factor in why people buy jewelry where they do, customers overwhelmingly complete their purchases in our stores with our trusted knowledgeable sales associates. We continue to place increasing emphasis on data analytics to support our interactions with customers, enable our sales associates and optimize all aspects of our business. Being best in digital and data driven is a crucial step of our omni-channel approach.
In order to truly accomplish our core mission of helping our guests “Celebrate Life and Express Love,” we must have people with high capability and passion. We will continue our efforts to attract, develop and retain the best and the brightest individuals in the jewelry and watch industry. The expression of romance and appreciation through bridal jewelry and gift giving are very important to our guests, as is self-reward. Guests associate Signet’s brands with high quality jewelry and an outstanding guest experience. As a result, the training of sales associates to understand the guests’ requirements, communicate the value of the merchandise selected and ensure guest needs are met remains a high priority.
Competition and Signet Competitive Strengths
Jewelry retailing is highly fragmented and competitive. We compete against other specialty jewelers, as well as other retailers that sell jewelry, including department stores, mass merchandisers, discount stores, apparel and accessory fashion stores, brand retailers, online retail and auction sites, shopping clubs, home shopping television channels and direct home sellers. The jewelry category competes for customers’ share-of-wallet with other consumer sectors such as electronics, clothing and furniture, as well as travel and restaurants. This competition for consumers’ discretionary spending is particularly relevant to gift giving.
Signet’s competitive strengths include: strong store brands, outstanding guest experience, branded differentiated and exclusive merchandise, sector-leading advertising, diversified real estate portfolio, supply chain leadership, customer finance programs, and financial strength and flexibility. Signet increases the attraction of its store brands to guests through the use of branded differentiated and exclusive merchandise, while offering a compelling value proposition in more basic ranges. Signet accomplishes this by utilizing its supply chain and merchandising expertise, scale and balance sheet strength. The Company intends to further develop and refine its national television advertising, digital media and customer relationship marketing, which it believes are the most effective and cost efficient forms of marketing available to grow its market share. Management follows the operating principles of excellence in execution, testing before investing, continuous improvement and disciplined investment in all aspects of the business.
Operational Strategy
In setting financial objectives for Fiscal 2018, consideration was given to several factors including the continued integration of Zale, Signet’s Vision 2020 strategy and the economic and retail environments in which the Company does business. Signet will execute on its strategic priorities and continue to make strategic investments for the future. Our focus in Fiscal 2018 will be on the following:
|
•
|
Omni-Channel capabilities and repositioning of investments and resources to drive customer experience both in-store and on-line.
|
|
•
|
Continued product innovation in both bridal and fashion.
|
|
•
|
Further development and investments in IT infrastructure to enable future growth.
|
|
•
|
Driving efficiencies across the organization in both processes and costs and maximizing return on investments.
|
5
Financial objectives for the business in Fiscal 2018 are to position the Company for long-term growth by:
|
•
|
Expanding our gross margin rate through merchandise initiatives, operating efficiencies and cost control. Signet anticipates the cost of diamonds, our most significant input cost, to increase at low-to-mid single digit rates.
|
|
•
|
Investing to strengthen our customer service proposition and our infrastructure for the long-term. This is expected to result in de-leverage of selling, general and administrative expenses.
|
|
•
|
Gaining profitable market share through brand differentiation and market segmentation, product cost control and asset management.
|
|
•
|
Diversification of store portfolio weighted toward off-mall locations. This includes closure of 165-170 stores, primarily focused on mall-based regional brands and opening of 90-115 new stores, primarily Kay off-mall.
|
|
•
|
Investing $260 to $275 million of capital in new stores, store remodels, information technology infrastructure and distribution facilities to drive future growth.
|
|
•
|
Completion of Signet’s strategic credit review previously announced in May 2016.
|
Capital Strategy
The Company expects to maintain a strong balance sheet that provides the flexibility to execute its strategic priorities, invest in its business, and then return excess cash to shareholders while ensuring adequate liquidity. Signet is committed to maintaining its investment grade rating because long-term, it intends to pursue value-enhancing strategic growth initiatives. Among the key tenets of Signet’s capital strategy:
|
•
|
Achieve adjusted debt
(1)
/ adjusted EBITDAR
(1)
(“adjusted leverage ratio”) of 3.5x or below. This would allow the Company to utilize available sources of debt in Fiscal 2018 and beyond.
|
|
•
|
Distribute 70% to 80% of annual free cash flow
(1)
in the form of stock repurchases or dividends assuming no other strategic uses of capital.
|
|
•
|
Consistently increase the dividend annually assuming no other strategic uses of capital.
|
The Company has a remaining share repurchase authorization as of the end of Fiscal 2017 of
$510.6 million
.
|
(1)
|
Adjusted debt, Adjusted EBITDAR, and free cash flow are non-GAAP measures. Signet believes they are useful measures to provide insight into how the Company intends to use capital. See Item 6 for reconciliation.
|
BACKGROUND
Operating segments
The business is managed as five reportable segments: the Sterling Jewelers division (
61.3%
of sales and
93.8%
of operating income), the Zale division, which is comprised of the Zale Jewelry segment (
24.2%
of sales and
8.1%
of operating income) and the Piercing Pagoda segment (
4.1%
of sales and
1.5%
of operating income) and the UK Jewelry division (
10.1%
of sales and
6.0%
of operating income). All divisions are managed by an executive committee, which is chaired by Signet’s Chief Executive Officer, who reports to the Board of Directors of Signet (the “Board”). The executive committee is responsible for operating decisions within parameters established by the Board. Additionally, as a result of the acquisition of a diamond polishing factory in Gaborone, Botswana in Fiscal 2014, management established a separate reportable segment (“Other”). Other consists of all non-reportable segments, including subsidiaries involved in the purchasing and conversion of rough diamonds to polished stones and unallocated corporate administrative functions. See
Note 4
of Item 8 for additional information regarding the Company’s segments.
Trademarks and trade names
Signet is not dependent on any material patents or licenses in any of its divisions. Signet has several well-established trademarks and trade names which are significant in maintaining its reputation and competitive position in the jewelry retailing industry. Some of these registered trademarks and trade names include the following:
|
•
|
Kay Jewelers
®
; Kay Jewelers Outlet
®
; Jared The Galleria Of Jewelry
®
; Jared Vault
®
; Jared Jewelry Boutique
®
; JB Robinson
®
Jewelers; Marks & Morgan Jewelers
®
; Every kiss begins with Kay
®
; He went to Jared
®
; Celebrate Life. Express Love.
®
; the Leo
®
Diamond; Hearts Desire
®
; Artistry Diamonds
®
; Charmed Memories
®
; Diamonds in Rhythm
®
; Fourone
TM
; Open Hearts by Jane Seymour
®
; Radiant Reflections
®
; Colors in Rhythm
®
;
Chosen by Jared
TM
; Now and Forever
®
; and Ever Us
TM
.
|
|
•
|
Zales
®
; Zales Jewelers
TM
; Zales the Diamond Store
®
; Zales Outlet
®
; Gordon’s Jewelers
®
; Peoples Jewellers
®
; Peoples the Diamond Store
®
; Peoples Outlet the Diamond Store
®
; Mappins
®
; Piercing Pagoda
®
; Arctic Brilliance Canadian Diamonds
®
; Brilliant Buy
®
; Brilliant Value
®
; Celebration Diamond
®
; Expressionist
TM
; From This Moment
®
; Let Love Shine
®
; The Celebration Diamond Collection
®
; Unstoppable Love
®
; and Endless Brilliance
®
.
|
|
•
|
H.Samuel
®
; Ernest Jones
®
; Ernest Jones Outlet Collection
TM
; Leslie Davis
®
; Commitment
®
; Forever Diamonds
®
; Kiss Collection
®
; Princessa Collection
®
; Radiance
®
; Secrets of the Sea
®
; Shades of Gold
®
; and Viva Colour
®
.
|
6
Store locations
Signet operates retail jewelry stores in a variety of real estate formats including mall-based, free-standing, strip center and outlet store locations. As of
January 28, 2017
, Signet operated
3,066
stores and
616
kiosks across
5.1 million
square feet of retail space in the US, UK, Canada and Puerto Rico. This represented an increase of
1.6%
and
2.6%
in locations and retail space, respectively, from Fiscal 2016 due to new store growth as Signet opened
162
stores and closed
105
stores during
Fiscal 2017
. Store locations by country and territory as of
January 28, 2017
are disclosed in Item 2.
Guest experience
The guest experience is an essential element in the success of our business and Signet strives to continually improve the quality of the guest experience. Therefore the ability to recruit, develop and retain qualified jewelry consultants is an important element in enhancing guest satisfaction. We have comprehensive recruitment, training and incentive programs in place, including an annual flagship training conference in advance of the holiday season.
Signet continues to invest in technology to enhance the guest experience, such as a clienteling system that we have initially implemented in our Sterling Jewelers division. This technology provides a single view of the guest with the capability to holistically capture guest information for the purpose of driving incremental sales to our guests. This allows jewelry consultants to improve and personalize their interactions with guests before, during and after store visits, to inform them of the latest merchandise offerings and fashion trends. Additionally, in Fiscal 2018, Signet will complete the roll out of digital gemscopes to every store location in North America. These gemscopes leverage proprietary software to provide an enhanced digital view of gem stones and include the ability to email the image to the guest and the Jared Design & Service Center when sent for repair.
We use employee and guest satisfaction metrics to monitor and improve performance.
Omni-Channel
As a specialty jeweler, Signet’s business differs from many other retailers such that a purchase of merchandise from any of Signet’s stores is personal, intimate and typically viewed as an important experience. Due to this dynamic, guests often invest time on Signet websites and social media to experience the merchandise assortments prior to visiting brick-and-mortar stores to execute a purchase transaction. Particularly related to high value transactions, guests will supplement their online experience with an in-store visit prior to finalizing a purchase.
Through Signet’s websites, we educate guests and provide them with a source of information on products and brands, available merchandise, as well as the ability to buy online. Our websites are integrated with each division’s stores, so that merchandise ordered online may be picked up at a store or delivered to the guest. Brand websites continue to make an important and growing contribution to the guest experience, as well as to each division’s marketing programs. For Fiscal 2018, the Company is focused on:
|
•
|
Investments in technology, including eCommerce platforms, focused on improving the online journey. Customer journey enhancements include user generated content, enhanced personalization / behavioral targeting, creative execution and brand differentiation. In addition, we are focused on omni-channel wishlist, online merchandising, in-store appointment booking, bridal configuration and much more.
|
|
•
|
Optimization of marketing through prioritizing dollars to digital spend and targeted marketing through traditional media.
|
|
•
|
Increased use of data analytics, clienteling and other key touch points to achieve a more comprehensive view of the customer and allow us to anticipate their needs.
|
Signet’s supplier relationships allow it to display suppliers’ inventories on the brand websites for sale to guests without holding the items in its inventory until the products are ordered by guests, which are referred to as “virtual inventory.” Virtual inventory expands the choice of merchandise available to guests both online and in-store.
Raw materials
The jewelry industry generally is affected by fluctuations in the price and supply of diamonds, gold and, to a much lesser extent, other precious and semi-precious metals and stones. Diamonds account for about
45%
, and gold about
14%
, of Signet’s cost of merchandise sold, respectively.
Signet undertakes hedging for a portion of its requirement for gold through the use of net zero-cost collar arrangements, forward contracts and commodity purchasing. It is not possible to hedge against fluctuations in the cost of diamonds. The cost of raw materials is only part of the costs involved in determining the retail selling price of jewelry, with labor costs also being a significant factor.
Diamond sourcing
Signet procures its diamonds mostly as finished jewelry and, to a smaller extent, as loose polished diamonds and rough diamonds which are in turn polished in Signet’s Botswana factory.
7
Finished jewelry
Signet purchases finished product where management has identified compelling value based on product design, cost and availability, among other factors. Under certain types of arrangements, this method of purchasing also provides the Company with the opportunity to reserve inventory held by vendors and to make returns or exchanges with suppliers, which reduces the risk of over- or under-purchasing. Signet’s scale, strong balance sheet and robust procurement systems enable it to purchase merchandise at advantageous prices and on favorable terms.
Loose diamonds
Signet purchases loose polished diamonds in global markets (e.g. India, Israel) from a variety of sources (e.g. polishers, traders). Signet mounts stones in settings purchased from manufacturers using third parties and in-house resources. By using these approaches, the cost of merchandise is reduced and the consistency of quality is maintained enabling Signet to provide better value to guests. Buying loose diamonds helps allow Signet’s buyers to gain a detailed understanding of the manufacturing cost structures and, in turn, leverage that knowledge with regard to negotiating better prices for the supply of finished products.
Rough diamonds
Signet continues to take steps to advance its vertical integration, which includes rough diamond sourcing and processing. Signet’s objective with this initiative is to secure additional, reliable and consistent supplies of diamonds for guests worldwide while achieving further efficiencies in the supply chain. In Fiscal 2014, Signet acquired a diamond polishing factory in Gaborone, Botswana. The Company is a DeBeers sightholder, and receives contracted allocations of rough diamonds from Rio Tinto, DeBeers and Alrosa. Signet has also established a diamond liaison office in India and a diamond trading office in New York to further support its sourcing initiative.
Rough diamonds are purchased directly from the miners and then have the stones marked, cut and polished in Signet’s own polishing facility. Any stones deemed unsuitable for Signet’s needs are sold to third parties with the objective of recovering the original cost of the stones.
Merchandising and purchasing
Management believes that a competitive strength is our industry-leading merchandising. Merchandise selection, innovation, availability and value are all critical success factors. The range of merchandise offered and the high level of inventory availability are supported centrally by extensive and continuous research and testing. Signet’s jewelry design center in New York evaluates global design trends, innovates, and helps our merchant teams develop new jewelry collections that resonate with guests.
Best-selling products are identified and replenished rapidly through analysis of sales by stock keeping unit. This approach enables Signet to deliver a focused assortment of merchandise to maximize sales and inventory turn, and minimize the need for discounting. Signet believes it is able to offer greater value and consistency of merchandise than its competitors due to its supply chain strengths. The scale and information systems available to us and the evolution of jewelry fashion trends allow for the careful testing of new merchandise in a range of representative stores. This enables us to make informed decisions about which merchandise to select, thereby increasing our ability to satisfy guests’ requirements while reducing the likelihood of having to discount merchandise.
Merchandise mix
Details of merchandise mix (excluding repairs, warranty and other miscellaneous sales) are shown below:
8
|
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
|
Zale division
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
|
Total
Signet
|
||||
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Diamonds and diamond jewelry
|
77
|
%
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
Gold and silver jewelry, including charm bracelets
|
9
|
%
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
Other jewelry, including gift category
|
8
|
%
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
Watches
|
6
|
%
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Diamonds and diamond jewelry
|
77
|
%
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
Gold and silver jewelry, including charm bracelets
|
9
|
%
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
Other jewelry, including gift category
|
8
|
%
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
Watches
|
6
|
%
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Diamonds and diamond jewelry
|
76
|
%
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
Gold and silver jewelry, including charm bracelets
|
10
|
%
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
Other jewelry, including gift category
|
8
|
%
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
Watches
|
6
|
%
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
The bridal category, which includes engagement, wedding and anniversary purchases, is predominantly diamond jewelry. Like fashion jewelry and watches, bridal is to an extent dependent on the economic environment as guests can trade up or down price points depending on their available budget. In Fiscal
2017
, bridal sales declined in-line with merchandise sales overall. Declines in the Sterling and Zale divisions were partially offset by growth in the UK. An important element in enabling Signet’s bridal business is customer financing. Bridal represented approximately 50% of Signet’s total merchandise sales. The performance difference between branded and non-branded bridal was immaterial.
Gift giving is particularly important during the Holiday Season, Valentine’s Day and Mother’s Day. In Fiscal
2017
, Signet had several successful fashion jewelry collections including Ever Us
TM
and Vera Wang
®
(not all collections are sold in every store brand).
Merchandise is categorized as non-branded, third party branded, and branded differentiated and exclusive. Non-branded merchandise includes items and styles such as bracelets, gold necklaces, solitaire diamond rings, and diamond stud earrings. Third party branded merchandise includes mostly watches, but also includes ranges of charm bracelets. Branded differentiated and exclusive merchandise are items that are branded and exclusive to Signet within its marketplaces, or that are not widely available in other jewelry retailers (e.g Ever Us, Vera Wang Love, Neil Lane).
Branded differentiated and exclusive ranges
Management believes that the development of branded differentiated and exclusive merchandise raises the profile of Signet’s brands, helps to drive sales and provides its well-trained sales associates with a powerful selling proposition. National television advertisements include elements that drive brand awareness and purchase intent of these ranges. Signet’s scale and proven record of success in developing branded differentiated and exclusive merchandise attracts offers of such programs from jewelry manufacturers, designers and others ahead of competing retailers, and enables it to leverage its supply chain strengths.
Merchandise held on consignment
Merchandise held on consignment is used to enhance product selection and test new designs. This minimizes exposure to changes in fashion trends and obsolescence, and provides the flexibility to return non-performing merchandise. Virtually all of Signet’s consignment inventory is held in the US.
Suppliers
In Fiscal
2017
, the five largest suppliers collectively accounted for
20.4%
of total purchases, with the largest supplier comprising
5.5%
. Signet transacts business with suppliers on a worldwide basis at various stages of the supply chain with third party diamond cutting and jewelry manufacturing being predominantly carried out in Asia.
Marketing and advertising
Customers’ confidence in our retail brands, store brand name recognition and advertising of branded differentiated and exclusive ranges are important factors in determining buying decisions in the jewelry industry where the majority of merchandise is unbranded. Therefore, Signet continues to strengthen and promote its store brands and merchandise brands by delivering superior customer service and building brand name
9
recognition. The Company’s omni-channel approach leverages marketing investments in television, digital media (desktop, mobile and social), radio, print, catalog, direct mail, point of sale signage and in-store displays, as well as coupon books and outdoor signage for the Outlet channels.
While marketing activities are undertaken throughout the year, the level of activity is concentrated at periods when guests are expected to be most receptive to marketing messages, which is ahead of Christmas Day, Valentine’s Day and Mother’s Day. A majority of the expenditure is spent on national television advertising, which is used to promote the store brands. Within such advertisements, Signet also promotes certain merchandise ranges, in particular its branded differentiated and exclusive merchandise and other branded products. Statistical and technology-based systems are employed to support customer relationship marketing programs that use a proprietary database to build guest loyalty and strengthen the relationship with guests through mail, email, social media and telephone communications. The programs target current guests with special savings and merchandise offers during key sales periods. Our targeted marketing efforts are aligned with our customer segmentation approach which, as discussed previously, differentiates our brands by focusing on customer attitudes and behaviors, rather than demographic information. In addition, invitations to special in-store promotional events are extended throughout the year.
Details of gross advertising, advertising before vendor contributions, by division is shown below:
|
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
Gross advertising spending
|
as a % of divisional sales
|
|
Gross advertising spending
|
as a % of divisional sales
|
|
Gross advertising spending
|
as a % of divisional sales
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|||||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
|
$
|
258.6
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
261.2
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
246.6
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
Zale division
|
|
100.2
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
98.7
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
64.6
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|||
|
UK Jewelry division
|
|
21.8
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
24.3
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
21.8
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|||
|
Signet
|
|
$
|
380.6
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
384.2
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
333.0
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Customer finance
In our North American markets, Signet sells products for cash and for payment through major credit cards and third-party financing like PayPal. In addition, customer financing is offered through proprietary credit programs that are provided either in-house or through outsourced relationships with select major lenders.
Consumer credit programs are an integral part of our business and enable incremental retail sales as well as building customer loyalty. Our in-house credit programs also generate revenues from finance charges and other fees on these credit programs, while saving on interchange fees that Signet would incur if our customers used major credit cards only.
Real estate
Management has specific operating and financial criteria that have to be satisfied before investing in new stores or renewing leases on existing stores. Substantially all the stores operated by Signet are leased. In
Fiscal 2017
, global net store space increased
2.6%
as a result of new store growth focused on off-mall locations. The greatest opportunity for new stores is in locations outside traditional covered malls which further diversifies Signet’s real estate portfolio.
Recent investment in the store portfolio is set out below:
10
|
(in millions)
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
|
Zale division
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
|
Total
Signet
|
||||||||
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
New store capital investment
|
$
|
42.9
|
|
|
$
|
22.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
67.6
|
|
|
Remodels and other store capital investment
|
47.9
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
98.3
|
|
||||
|
Total store capital investment
|
$
|
90.8
|
|
|
$
|
57.3
|
|
|
$
|
17.8
|
|
|
$
|
165.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
New store capital investment
|
$
|
48.3
|
|
|
$
|
12.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
63.7
|
|
|
Remodels and other store capital investment
|
50.6
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
91.9
|
|
||||
|
Total store capital investment
|
$
|
98.9
|
|
|
$
|
37.1
|
|
|
$
|
19.6
|
|
|
$
|
155.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
New store capital investment
|
$
|
52.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
59.4
|
|
|
Remodels and other store capital investment
|
52.6
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
$
|
79.0
|
|
|||
|
Total store capital investment
|
$
|
105.2
|
|
|
$
|
19.5
|
|
|
$
|
13.7
|
|
|
$
|
138.4
|
|
Seasonality
Signet’s sales are seasonal, with the first quarter slightly exceeding
20%
of annual sales, the second and third quarters each approximating
20%
and the fourth quarter accounting for almost
40%
of annual sales, with December being by far the most important month of the year. The “Holiday Season” consists of results for the months of November and December. As a result, approximately
45%
to
55%
of Signet’s annual operating income normally occurs in the fourth quarter, comprised of nearly all of the UK Jewelry and Zale divisions’ annual operating income and about
40%
to
45%
of the Sterling Jewelers division’s annual operating income.
Employees
In
Fiscal 2017
, the average number of full-time equivalent persons employed was
29,566
. In addition, Signet usually employs a limited number of temporary employees during its fourth quarter. None of Signet’s employees in the UK and less than 1% of Signet’s employees in the US and Canada are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Signet considers its relationship with its employees to be excellent.
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|||
|
Average number of employees:
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
16,342
|
|
|
16,140
|
|
|
16,147
|
|
|
Zale
(2)
|
9,602
|
|
|
9,309
|
|
|
9,241
|
|
|
UK Jewelry
|
3,398
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
3,292
|
|
|
Other
(3)
|
224
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
Total
|
29,566
|
|
|
29,057
|
|
|
28,949
|
|
|
(1)
|
Full-time equivalents (“FTEs”).
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
1,051
FTEs,
1,201
FTEs and
1,217
FTEs employed in Canada in
Fiscal 2017
,
Fiscal 2016
and
Fiscal 2015
, respectively.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes corporate employees and employees employed at the diamond polishing plant located in Botswana.
|
Regulation
Signet is required to comply with numerous laws and regulations covering areas such as consumer protection, consumer privacy, data protection, consumer credit, consumer credit insurance, health and safety, waste disposal, supply chain integrity, truth in advertising and employment. Management monitors changes in these laws to endeavor to comply with applicable requirements.
Markets
Signet operates in the US, Canada and UK markets.
US
According to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis and Census Bureau, the total jewelry and watch market was approximately $80 billion at the end of 2016, up nearly 5% from the prior year. This implies a Signet jewelry market share of approximately 7%. Since 2000, the industry average annual growth rate is 3.2%. Nearly 90% of the market is represented by jewelry, with the balance being attributable to watches. According to the latest data from the US Labor Department, there were nearly 21,000 jewelry stores in the country, down approximately 1.6% from the prior year.
11
Canada
The jewelry market in Canada, according to Euromonitor, has grown steadily over the past five years, rising to an estimated C$7.2 billion in 2014, the latest data available to Signet. This represents a compound annual growth rate of 4.6%. Euromonitor estimates that 2014 was up 3% in dollars and 2% in units.
UK
In the UK, the jewelry and watch market stands at about £4.1 billion, according to Mintel. That market saw a recovery in 2015 with growth of 1.2%. Self-purchasing among young women and gifting among men represent the largest parts of the precious jewelry market. The growth represents a slight slowdown from that achieved in 2014 due to a shift towards lighter-weight pieces and a decrease in average selling prices.
STERLING JEWELERS DIVISION
The Sterling Jewelers division operates jewelry stores in malls and off-mall locations in all 50 US states under national brands including Kay, Kay Jewelers Outlet, Jared and Jared Vault, as well as a variety of mall-based regional brands.
Sterling Jewelers store brand reviews
Store activity by brand
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
||||||
|
Kay
|
68
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|||
|
Jared
|
8
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|||
|
Regional brands
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|||
|
Total stores opened or acquired during the year
|
76
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Kay
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|||
|
Jared
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
|||
|
Regional brands
|
(20
|
)
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|||
|
Total stores closed during the year
|
(28
|
)
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Kay
|
1,192
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|||
|
Jared
|
275
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|||
|
Regional brands
|
121
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|||
|
Total stores open at the end of the year
|
1,588
|
|
|
1,540
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Kay
|
$
|
2.124
|
|
|
$
|
2.178
|
|
|
$
|
2.112
|
|
|
|
Jared
(1)
|
$
|
4.379
|
|
|
$
|
4.650
|
|
|
$
|
4.794
|
|
|
|
Regional brands
|
$
|
1.242
|
|
|
$
|
1.333
|
|
|
$
|
1.318
|
|
|
|
Average sales per store (millions)
(2)
|
$
|
2.449
|
|
|
$
|
2.518
|
|
|
$
|
2.467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Kay
|
1,826
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
|
|||
|
Jared
|
1,177
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|||
|
Regional brands
|
151
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|||
|
Total net selling square feet (thousands)
|
3,154
|
|
|
3,025
|
|
|
2,882
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Increase in net store selling space
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|||
(1)
Includes sales from all Jared store formats, including the smaller square footage and lower average sales per store concepts of Jared 4.0, Jared Jewelry Boutique and Jared Vault.
(2)
Based only upon stores operated for the full fiscal year and calculated on a 52-week basis.
12
Sales data by brand
|
|
|
|
Change from
previous year
|
||||||
|
Fiscal 2017
|
Sales
(millions) |
|
Same store
sales |
|
Total
sales |
||||
|
Kay
|
$
|
2,539.7
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
Jared
|
1,227.5
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
Regional brands
|
163.2
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)%
|
|
(20.6
|
)%
|
|
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
$
|
3,930.4
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
Kay Jewelers
Kay accounted for
40%
of Signet’s sales in
Fiscal 2017
(
Fiscal 2016
: 39%) and operated
1,192
stores in 50 states as of
January 28, 2017
(
January 30, 2016
:
1,129
stores). Since 2004, Kay has been the largest specialty retail jewelry store brand in the US based on sales, and has subsequently increased its leadership position. Like the rest of our store banners, Kay targets a mid-market jewelry customer. But where Kay differs is that it particularly targets a customer, we identify as a “gifter,” who knows they need to buy jewelry but does not enjoy shopping and needs help to get it done right.
Details of Kay’s performance over the last three years is shown below:
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Sales (millions)
|
$
|
2,539.7
|
|
|
$
|
2,530.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,346.2
|
|
|
Average sales per store (millions)
|
$
|
2.124
|
|
|
$
|
2.178
|
|
|
$
|
2.112
|
|
|
Stores at year end
|
1,192
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|||
|
Total net selling square feet (thousands)
|
1,826
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
|||
Kay mall stores typically occupy about 1,600 square feet and have approximately 1,300 square feet of selling space, whereas Kay off-mall stores typically occupy about 2,200 square feet and have approximately 1,800 square feet of selling space. Kay operates in malls and off-mall stores. Off-mall stores primarily are located in outlet malls and power centers. The Sterling Jewelers store footprint will continue to diversify in Fiscal 2018 as new stores will be principally Kay stores in off-mall locations.
The following table summarizes the current composition of stores as of
January 28, 2017
and net openings (closures) in the past three years:
|
|
Stores at
|
|
Net openings (closures)
|
||||||||
|
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||
|
Mall
|
751
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
6
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Off-mall and outlet
|
441
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Total
|
1,192
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
39
|
|
Jared The Galleria Of Jewelry
With
275
stores in 40 states as of
January 28, 2017
(
January 30, 2016
:
270
stores), Jared is a leading off-mall destination specialty retail jewelry store chain, based on sales. Jared accounted for
19%
of Signet’s sales in
Fiscal 2017
(
Fiscal 2016
: 19%). Jared is the fourth largest US specialty retail jewelry brand by sales. Like the rest of our store banners, Jared targets a mid-market jewelry customer. But where Jared differs is that it particularly targets a customer, we identify as a “sentimentalist,” who enjoys shopping for jewelry and cares very much about the details of the product and shopping process.
Details of Jared’s performance over the last three years is shown below:
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Sales (millions)
|
$
|
1,227.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,252.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,188.8
|
|
|
Average sales per store
(millions)
(1)
|
$
|
4.379
|
|
|
$
|
4.650
|
|
|
$
|
4.794
|
|
|
Stores at year end
|
275
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
253
|
|
|||
|
Total net selling square feet (thousands)
|
1,177
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|||
(1)
Includes sales from all Jared store formats, including the smaller square footage and lower average sales per store concepts of Jared 4.0, Jared Jewelry Boutique and Jared Vault.
13
Jared offers superior guest service and enhanced selection of merchandise. Every Jared store has an on-site design and service center where most repairs are completed within the same day. Each store also has at least one diamond salon, a children’s play area, and complimentary refreshments.
The typical Jared store has about 4,800 square feet of selling space and approximately 6,000 square feet of total space. Jared locations are normally free-standing sites with high visibility and traffic flow, positioned close to major roads within shopping developments. Jared stores usually operate in retail centers that contain strong retail co-tenants, including big box, destination stores and some smaller specialty units.
Jared also operates Jared Jewelry Boutiques within malls. These mall stores have a smaller footprint than standard Jared locations and generally less than 2,000 square feet of selling space. A similar off-mall concept known as Jared 4.0, which utilizes approximately 3,600 square feet of selling space, allows for store openings in smaller markets, expands the Jared brand and increases the return on Jared advertising investment. Finally, Jared operates an outlet-mall concept known as Jared Vault which utilizes approximately 1,600 square feet of selling space. These stores are smaller than off-mall Jareds and offer a mix of identical products as Jared, as well as different, outlet-specific products at lower prices.
The following table summarizes the current composition of stores as of
January 28, 2017
and net openings (closures) in the past three years:
|
|
Stores at
|
|
Net openings (closures)
|
||||||||
|
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||
|
Mall
|
10
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Off-mall and outlet
|
265
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Total
|
275
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
50
|
|
Sterling Jewelers regional brands
The Sterling Jewelers division also operates mall stores under a variety of established regional nameplates. Regional brands in the Sterling Jewelers division accounted for
3%
of Signet’s sales in
Fiscal 2017
(
Fiscal 2016
: 3%) and as of
January 28, 2017
, include
121
regional brand stores in 29 states (
January 30, 2016
:
141
stores in 31 states). The leading brands include JB Robinson Jewelers, Marks & Morgan Jewelers and Belden Jewelers. Also included in the regional nameplates are Goodman Jewelers, LeRoy’s Jewelers, Osterman Jewelers, Rogers Jewelers, Shaw’s Jewelers and Weisfield Jewelers. The Company’s strategy is to reduce regional brand locations through conversion to national store brands or through closure upon lease expiration.
Details of the regional brands’ performance over the last three years is shown below:
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Sales (millions)
|
$
|
163.2
|
|
|
$
|
205.5
|
|
|
$
|
230.0
|
|
|
Average sales per store (millions)
|
$
|
1.242
|
|
|
$
|
1.333
|
|
|
$
|
1.318
|
|
|
Stores at year end
|
121
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
157
|
|
|||
|
Total net selling square feet (thousands)
|
151
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
196
|
|
|||
Sterling Jewelers operating review
Other sales
Custom design services represent less than 5% of sales but provide higher than average profitability. Our custom jewelry initiative has a proprietary computer selling system and in-store design capabilities. Design & Service Centers, located in Jared stores, are staffed with skilled artisans who support the custom business generated by other Sterling Jewelers division stores, as well as the Jared stores in which they are located. The custom design and repair function has its own field management and training structure.
Repair services represent less than 5% of sales, approximately 30% of transactions and are an important opportunity to build customer loyalty. The Jared Design & Service Centers, open the same hours as the store, also support other Sterling Jewelers and Zale division stores’ repair business.
The Sterling Jewelers division sells extended service plans covering lifetime repair service for jewelry and jewelry replacement plans. The lifetime repair service plans cover services such as ring sizing, refinishing and polishing, rhodium plating of white gold, earring repair, chain soldering and the resetting of diamonds and gemstones that arise due to the normal usage of the merchandise. Jewelry replacement plans require the issuance of new replacement merchandise if the original merchandise is determined to be defective or damaged within a defined period in accordance with the plan agreement. Any repair work is performed in-house.
14
Customer finance
General
Our in-house consumer financing program provides Signet with a competitive advantage through the enabling of incremental profitable sales that would not occur without a consumer financing program. Several factors inherent in the US jewelry business support the circumstances through which Signet is uniquely positioned to generate profitable incremental business through its consumer financing program. These factors include a high average transaction value; a significant population of customers seeking to finance merchandise primarily in the bridal category; and the minimum scale necessary to administer credit programs efficiently. In addition, our credit program provides other benefits to our business overall, including:
|
•
|
complementing our “Best in Bridal” strategy in that 50% of merchandise sales are bridal and 75% of Sterling Jewelers division bridal sales utilize our credit as form of tender.
|
|
•
|
providing a database of regular guests and spending habits.
|
|
•
|
establishing collection policies designed to minimize risk and maximize future sales as opposed to a focus on maximizing earnings from outstanding balances.
|
For our in-house credit program, as of
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
, 55% and 53%, respectively, of balances due were from customers who were acquired as users of our credit program more than 12 months prior to their most recent purchase.
Our in-house consumer financing program has been centralized since 1990 and is fully integrated into the management of the Sterling Jewelers division. It is not a separate operating division nor does it report separate results. All assets and liabilities relating to consumer financing are shown on the balance sheet and there are no associated off-balance sheet arrangements. In addition to interest-bearing transactions that involve the use of in-house customer finance, a portion of credit sales are made using interest-free financing for one year and at a reduced rate for up to 36 months in select offers, subject to certain conditions. In most US states, guests also are offered optional third-party credit insurance.
As part of our operational strategy discussed previously, management continues to review strategic options related to its in-house consumer financing programs, which include optimizing our current in-house program or utilizing a full-outsourced model.
Underwriting
The majority of credit applications originate in one of our retail locations and are approved or denied automatically based on proprietary origination models. Origination and purchase authorization strategies are designed by a dedicated Risk Management team, which is separate and distinct from our retail sales organization ensuring that financing decisions are not influenced by sales driven objectives. Our underwriting process considers one or more of the following elements: credit bureau information; income and address verification; current income and debt levels. We have developed and refined proprietary statistical models that provide standardized credit decisions, and drive the optimization of credit limit assignment, down payment requirements and more significant debt service requirements as compared to general consumer lending standards. For certain credit applicants that may have past credit problems or lack credit history, we use stricter underwriting criteria. These additional requirements may include items such as verification of employment and minimum down payment levels. Part of our ability to control delinquency and net charge-offs is based on the level of required down payments, tailored credit limits and more significant debt service requirements as mentioned above. Underwriting risk tolerance has not been altered in the past 10 years. Several factors can influence portfolio risk outside of the initial origination and subsequent authorization decisions including macro-economic conditions, regulatory environment, operational system stability and strategy execution, store execution, and the ability of marketing and prospecting activities to attract a consistent risk weighted mix of new applicants to the receivable.
The scores of Fair Isaac Corporation (“FICO”), a widely-used financial metric for assessing a person’s credit rating are used to benchmark portfolio and origination risk over time. Ten to twenty point ranges tend to be grouped together to form tiers of risk and scores can range from a low of 0 to over 800. The following aggregate FICO metrics for the portfolio demonstrate the overall consistency of our financing strategy approach:
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Balance weighted FICO score - New Additions
|
684
|
|
684
|
|
685
|
|
Balance weighted FICO score - Portfolio
|
661
|
|
662
|
|
663
|
Credit monitoring and collections
Our objective is to facilitate the sale of jewelry and to collect the outstanding credit balance as quickly as possible, minimizing risk and enabling the customer to make additional jewelry purchases using their credit facility. On average, our receivable portfolio turns every 9-10 months. We closely monitor the credit portfolio to identify delinquent accounts early, and dedicate resources to contacting customers concerning past due accounts when they are as few as 5 days in arrears. Collectors are focused on a quality customer experience using risk-based calling and strategic account segmentation.
15
The quality of our credit loan portfolio at any time reflects, among other factors: 1) the creditworthiness of our customers, 2) general economic conditions, 3) the success of our account management and collection activities, and 4) a variety of variables that change over time such as the proportion of new versus seasoned accounts or changes in the relative growth rate in sales between our various retail brands or formats. Cash flows associated with the granting of credit to guests of the individual store are included in the projections used when considering store investment proposals.
Portfolio aging
Since inception of its in-house financing, Signet measures delinquency and establishes loss allowances using a form of the recency method. This form of the recency method relies upon qualifying payments determined by management to measure delinquency. In general, an account will not remain current unless a qualifying payment is received. A customer is aged to the next delinquency level if they fail to make a qualifying payment by their monthly aging. A customer’s account ages each month five days after their due date listed on their statement, allowing for a grace period before collection efforts begin. A qualifying payment can be no less than 75% of the scheduled payment, increasing with the delinquency level. If an account holder is two payments behind, then they must make a full minimum payment to return to current status. If an account holder is three payments behind, then they must make three full payments before returning to a current status. If an account holder is more than three payments behind, then the entire past due amount is required to return to a current status. Establishing qualifying payment methods in accounting for delinquencies is appropriate considering the high minimum payments that are required of customers. The weighted average minimum payment required as a percentage of the outstanding balance was
8%
at year end
Fiscal 2017
. The minimum payment does not decline as the balance declines. These two facts combined (higher scheduled payment requirement and no decline in payment requirement as balance decreases) allow Signet to collect on the receivable significantly faster than other retail/bank card accounts, which require a 5% or less minimum payment, reducing risk and more quickly freeing up customer open to buy for additional purchases. Of all payments received in
Fiscal 2017
, 97% were equal to or greater than the scheduled monthly payment, which is in line with experience during
Fiscal 2016
.
See Note 1 of Item 8 for additional information regarding qualifying payments.
Allowances for uncollectible amounts are recorded as a charge to cost of goods sold in the income statement. The allowance is calculated using a model that analyzes factors such as delinquency rates and recovery rates. An allowance for amounts 90 days aged and under on a recency basis is established based on historical loss experience and payment performance information. A 100% allowance is made for any amount aged more than 90 days on a recency basis and any amount associated with an account the owner of which has filed for bankruptcy. An account is 90 days aged on a recency basis when there has not been a qualifying payment made within 90 days of the billing date. The net bad debt expensed on the income statement is equal to the sum of the total change in the allowance for uncollectible accounts and the total amount of charged off balances less any recoveries for accounts previously charged off. The allowance calculation is reviewed by management to assess whether, based on economic events, additional analysis is required to appropriately estimate losses inherent in the portfolio.
We deem accounts to be uncollectible and charge off when the account is both more than 120 days aged on a recency basis and 240 days aged on a contractual basis at the end of a month. Over the last 12 months, we have recovered 16% of charged-off amounts through our collection activities and the sale of previously charged off accounts. We track our charge-offs both gross, before recoveries, and net, after recoveries.
16
Customer financing statistics
(1)
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Total sales (millions)
|
$
|
3,930.4
|
|
|
$
|
3,988.7
|
|
|
$
|
3,765.0
|
|
|
Credit sales (millions)
|
$
|
2,438.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,451.2
|
|
|
$
|
2,277.1
|
|
|
Credit sales as % of total Sterling Jewelers sales
(2)
|
62.0
|
%
|
|
61.5
|
%
|
|
60.5
|
%
|
|||
|
Net bad debt expense (millions)
(3)
|
$
|
212.1
|
|
|
$
|
190.5
|
|
|
$
|
160.0
|
|
|
Opening receivables (millions)
|
$
|
1,855.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,666.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,453.8
|
|
|
Closing receivables (millions)
|
$
|
1,952.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,855.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,666.0
|
|
|
Number of active credit accounts at year end
(4)(7)
|
1,401,456
|
|
|
1,423,619
|
|
|
1,352,298
|
|
|||
|
Average outstanding account balance at year end
(7)
|
$
|
1,405
|
|
|
$
|
1,319
|
|
|
$
|
1,245
|
|
|
Average monthly collection rate
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|||
|
Ending bad debt allowance as a % of ending accounts receivable
(1)
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|||
|
Net charge-offs as a % of average gross accounts receivable
(1)(5)(7)
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|||
|
Non performing receivables as a % of ending accounts receivable
(1)
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Credit portfolio impact:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Net bad debt expense (millions)
(3)
|
$
|
(212.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(190.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(160.0
|
)
|
|
Late charge income (millions)
|
$
|
36.0
|
|
|
$
|
33.9
|
|
|
$
|
31.3
|
|
|
Interest income from in-house customer finance programs (millions)
(6)
|
$
|
277.6
|
|
|
$
|
252.5
|
|
|
$
|
217.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
101.5
|
|
|
$
|
95.9
|
|
|
$
|
89.2
|
|
(1)
See Note 11 of Item 8 for additional information.
(2)
Including any deposits taken at the time of sale.
(3)
Net bad expense is defined as the charge for the provision for bad debt less recoveries.
(4)
The number of active accounts is based on credit cycle end date closest to the fiscal year end date.
(5)
Net charge-offs calculated as gross charge-offs less recoveries. See Note 11 of Item 8 for additional information.
(6)
See Note 10 of Item 8. Primary component of other operating income, net, on the consolidated income statement.
(7)
See the liquidity and capital resources section of Item 7 for additional discussion regarding this metric.
ZALE DIVISION
The Zale division consists of two reportable segments: Zale Jewelry and Piercing Pagoda. Zale Jewelry operates jewelry stores located primarily in shopping malls throughout the US, Canada and Puerto Rico. Piercing Pagoda operates through mall-based kiosks throughout the US and Puerto Rico. In
Fiscal 2017
, approximately
14%
of goods purchased in the Zale division were denominated in Canadian dollars (
Fiscal 2016
:
9%
).
On May 29, 2014, Signet acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Zale Corporation and Zale Corporation became a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary of Signet (the “Acquisition”, see Note 3 in Item 8 for additional information related to the Acquisition). As such, Fiscal 2016 reflects the first full year of results as Fiscal 2015 reflects only the results since the acquisition date.
17
Zale store brand reviews
Store activity by brand
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
||||||
|
Zales
|
40
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|||
|
Peoples
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|||
|
Regional brands
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|||
|
Total Zale Jewelry
|
42
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
35
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|||
|
Total stores opened or acquired during the year
|
77
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Zales
|
(19
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|||
|
Peoples
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|||
|
Regional brands
|
(26
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|||
|
Total Zale Jewelry
|
(49
|
)
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
(24
|
)
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|||
|
Total stores closed during the year
|
(73
|
)
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Zales
|
751
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|||
|
Peoples
|
143
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|||
|
Regional brands
|
76
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|||
|
Total Zale Jewelry
|
970
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
972
|
|
|
|||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
616
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|||
|
Total stores open at the end of the year
|
1,586
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Zales
|
$
|
1.327
|
|
|
$
|
1.467
|
|
|
$
|
0.942
|
|
(3)
|
|
Peoples
|
$
|
1.267
|
|
|
$
|
1.353
|
|
|
$
|
1.096
|
|
(3)
|
|
Regional brands
|
$
|
0.982
|
|
|
$
|
0.942
|
|
|
$
|
0.682
|
|
(3)
|
|
Total Zale Jewelry
|
$
|
1.290
|
|
|
$
|
1.394
|
|
|
$
|
0.934
|
|
(3)
|
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
$
|
0.506
|
|
|
$
|
0.376
|
|
|
$
|
0.228
|
|
(3)
|
|
Average sales per store (millions)
(1)
|
$
|
0.988
|
|
|
$
|
1.003
|
|
|
$
|
0.662
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Zales
|
1,039
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|||
|
Peoples
|
190
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|||
|
Regional brands
|
82
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|||
|
Total Zale Jewelry
(2)
|
1,311
|
|
|
1,315
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
115
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|||
|
Total net selling square feet (thousands)
(2)
|
1,426
|
|
|
1,429
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Decrease (increase) in net store selling space
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|||
(1)
Based only upon stores operated for the full fiscal year and calculated on a 52-week basis.
(2)
Includes 227 thousand, 240 thousand and 240 thousand square feet of net selling space in Canada in
Fiscal 2017
,
Fiscal 2016
and
Fiscal 2015
, respectively.
(3)
Fiscal 2015 average sales per store calculated based on sales since date of Acquisition.
n/a Not applicable as Zale division was acquired in Fiscal 2015.
18
Sales data by brand
|
|
|
|
|
Change from
previous year
|
||||||
|
Fiscal 2017
|
Sales
(millions) |
|
Same store sales
|
|
Total
sales
|
|||||
|
Zales
|
$
|
1,257.4
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
Peoples
|
204.9
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
||
|
Regional brands
|
87.4
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)%
|
|
(22.2
|
)%
|
||
|
Total Zale Jewelry
|
$
|
1,549.7
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
263.1
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
||
|
Zale division
(1)
|
$
|
1,812.8
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
(1)
The Zale division same store sales includes merchandise and repair sales and excludes warranty and insurance revenues.
Zale Jewelry
Zale Jewelry is comprised of three core national brands, Zales Jewelers, Zales Outlet and Peoples Jewellers and two regional brands, Gordon’s Jewelers and Mappins Jewellers. Each brand specializes in jewelry and watches, with merchandise and marketing emphasis focused on diamond products.
Zales Jewelers, including Zales Outlet
Zales Jewelers operates primarily in shopping malls and offers a broad range of bridal, diamond solitaire and fashion jewelry. Zales Outlet operates in outlet malls and neighborhood power centers and capitalizes on Zales Jewelers’ national marketing and brand recognition. Like the rest of our store banners, Zales targets a mid-market jewelry customer. But where Zales differs is that it particularly targets a customer, we identify as a “stylish shopper,” for whom trend and leading styles are very important. Zales Jewelers and Zales Outlet are collectively referred to as “Zales.”
Zales accounted for
20%
of Signet’s sales in
Fiscal 2017
(
Fiscal 2016
: 19%) and operated a total of
751
stores, including
744
stores in the United States and
7
stores in Puerto Rico as of
January 28, 2017
(
January 30, 2016
: 730 total stores). Zales is positioned as “The Diamond Store” given its emphasis on diamond jewelry, especially in bridal and fashion.
Details of Zales’ performance since the Acquisition in Fiscal 2015 is shown below:
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
|||||||
|
Sales (millions)
|
$
|
1,257.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,241.0
|
|
|
$
|
800.9
|
|
|
|
|
Average sales per store (millions)
|
$
|
1.327
|
|
|
$
|
1.467
|
|
|
$
|
0.942
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Stores at year end
|
751
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
||||
|
Total net selling square feet (thousands)
|
1,039
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
||||
(1)
Fiscal 2015 average sales per store calculated based on sales since date of the Acquisition.
Zales mall stores typically occupy about 1,700 square feet and have approximately 1,300 square feet of selling space, whereas Zales off-mall stores typically occupy about 2,400 square feet and have approximately 1,700 square feet of selling space.
The following table summarizes the current composition of stores as of
January 28, 2017
and net openings (closures) since the Acquisition:
|
|
Stores at
|
|
Net openings (closures)
|
||||||||
|
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||
|
Mall
|
588
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
Off-mall and outlet
|
163
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total
|
751
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Peoples Jewellers
Peoples Jewellers (“Peoples”) is Canada’s largest jewelry retailer, offering jewelry at affordable prices. Peoples accounted for
3%
of Signet’s sales in
Fiscal 2017
(
Fiscal 2016
: 3%) and operated
143
stores in Canada as of
January 28, 2017
(
January 30, 2016
: 145 stores). Peoples is positioned as “Canada’s #1 Diamond Store” emphasizing its diamond business while also offering a wide selection of gold jewelry, gemstone jewelry and watches.
19
Details of Peoples’ performance since the Acquisition in Fiscal 2015 is shown below:
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
||||||
|
Sales (millions)
|
$
|
204.9
|
|
|
$
|
214.8
|
|
|
$
|
174.5
|
|
|
|
Average sales per store (millions)
(1)
|
$
|
1.267
|
|
|
$
|
1.353
|
|
|
$
|
1.096
|
|
(1)
|
|
Stores at year end
|
143
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|||
|
Total net selling square feet (thousands)
|
190
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|||
(1)
Fiscal 2015 average sales per store calculated based on sales since date of the Acquisition.
Peoples stores typically occupy about 1,600 square feet and have approximately 1,300 square feet of selling space.
Zale Jewelry regional brands
The Zale division also operates the regional store brands Gordon’s Jewelers (“Gordon’s”), in the US, and Mappins Jewellers (“Mappins”), in Canada. Regional brands in the Zale Jewelry segment accounted for
1%
of Signet’s sales in
Fiscal 2017
(
Fiscal 2016
: 2%) and operated a total of
76
stores, including
42
stores in the US and
34
stores in Canada as of
January 28, 2017
(
January 30, 2016
: 102 total stores). The Company expects the number of regional brands locations to continue to decline through conversion to national store brands or through closure upon lease expiration.
Details of the regional brands’ performance since the Acquisition is shown below:
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
||||||
|
Sales (millions)
|
$
|
87.4
|
|
|
$
|
112.4
|
|
|
$
|
93.3
|
|
|
|
Average sales per store (millions)
(1)
|
$
|
0.982
|
|
|
$
|
0.942
|
|
|
$
|
0.682
|
|
(1)
|
|
Stores at year end
|
76
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|||
|
Total net selling square feet (thousands)
|
82
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|||
(1)
Fiscal 2015 average sales per store calculated based on sales since date of the Acquisition.
Piercing Pagoda
Piercing Pagoda operates through mall-based kiosks in the US and Puerto Rico. Piercing Pagoda accounted for
4%
of Signet’s sales in
Fiscal 2017
(
Fiscal 2016
: 4%) and operated a total of
616
stores, including
609
stores in the United States and
7
stores in Puerto Rico as of
January 28, 2017
(
January 30, 2016
: 605 total stores). Details of Piercing Pagoda’s performance since the Acquisition in Fiscal 2015 is shown below:
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
|||||||
|
Sales (millions)
|
$
|
263.1
|
|
|
$
|
243.2
|
|
|
$
|
146.9
|
|
|
|
|
Average sales per store (millions)
(1)
|
$
|
0.506
|
|
|
$
|
0.376
|
|
|
$
|
0.228
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Stores at year end
|
616
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
||||
|
Total net selling square feet (thousands)
|
115
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
||||
(1)
Fiscal 2015 average sales per store calculated based on sales since date of the Acquisition.
Piercing Pagodas are generally located in high traffic areas that are easily accessible and visible within regional shopping malls. The typical customer is the female self-purchaser. Piercing Pagoda offers a selection of gold, silver and diamond jewelry in basic styles at moderate prices.
Zale operating review
Other sales
Repair services represent approximately
2%
of sales and
4%
of transactions and are an important opportunity to build customer loyalty. During
Fiscal 2017
, Zale utilized the Jared Design & Service Centers to support its repair business for all US locations, which was an increase from approximately 200 stores in Fiscal 2016.
The Zale division sells extended service plans on certain products covering lifetime repair service and jewelry replacement. The lifetime extended service plans cover services such as ring sizing, refinishing and polishing, rhodium plating of white gold, earring repair, chain soldering and the resetting of diamonds and gemstones that arise due to the normal usage of the merchandise or a replacement option if the merchandise cannot be repaired. Zale Jewelry also offers guests a two year fine watch warranty. Additionally, Zale Jewelry and Piercing Pagoda offer a one year jewelry replacement program, which requires the issuance of new replacement merchandise if the original merchandise is determined to be defective or damaged in accordance with the plan agreement.
20
Customer finance
Our consumer credit program is an integral part of our business and is a major driver of customer loyalty. Guests are offered revolving and interest free credit plans under our private label credit card programs offered in conjunction with Comenity Bank and TD Bank Services in Canada, in conjunction with other alternative finance vehicles, including Signet’s in-house consumer credit program beginning in late Fiscal 2016. These provide guests of the Zale division with a wide variety of financing options. Participation of the Zale division in Signet’s in-house consumer credit program was immaterial in Fiscal 2017. Nearly
47%
of Zale sales in the US were financed by private label customer credit in
Fiscal 2017
(
Fiscal 2016
:
42%
). Canadian private label credit card sales represented
32%
of Canadian sales in
Fiscal 2017
(
Fiscal 2016
:
29%
).
UK JEWELRY DIVISION
The UK Jewelry division transacts mainly in British pounds, as sales and the majority of operating expenses are incurred in that currency and its results are then translated into US dollars for external reporting purposes. In
Fiscal 2017
, approximately 25% of goods purchased were made in US dollars (
Fiscal 2016
: 25%). The following information for the UK Jewelry division is given in British pounds as management believes that this presentation assists in understanding the performance of the UK Jewelry division. Movements in the US dollar to British pound exchange rate therefore may have an impact on the results of Signet, particularly in periods of exchange rate volatility. See Item 6 for analysis of results at constant exchange rates; non-GAAP measures.
UK market
Ernest Jones and H.Samuel compete with a large number of independent jewelry retailers, as well as discount jewelry retailers, online retail and auction sites, apparel and accessory fashion stores, catalog showroom operators and supermarkets.
UK Jewelry store brand reviews
Store activity by brand
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
H.Samuel
|
6
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Ernest Jones
|
3
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
8
|
|
|||
|
Total stores opened or acquired during the year
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
8
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
H.Samuel
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|||
|
Ernest Jones
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|||
|
Total stores closed during the year
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
H.Samuel
|
304
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
302
|
|
|||
|
Ernest Jones
|
204
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
196
|
|
|||
|
Total stores open at the end of the year
|
508
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
498
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
H.Samuel
|
£
|
0.748
|
|
|
£
|
0.763
|
|
|
£
|
0.760
|
|
|
Ernest Jones
|
£
|
1.114
|
|
|
£
|
1.142
|
|
|
£
|
1.092
|
|
|
Average sales per store (millions)
(1)
|
£
|
0.894
|
|
|
£
|
0.910
|
|
|
£
|
0.887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
H.Samuel
|
329
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
327
|
|
|||
|
Ernest Jones
|
197
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
185
|
|
|||
|
Total net selling square feet (thousands)
|
526
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
512
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Increase in net store selling space
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|||
|
(1)
|
Based only upon stores operated for the full fiscal year and calculated on a 52-week basis.
|
21
Sales data by brand
|
|
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|||||||||
|
Fiscal 2017
|
Sales
(millions) |
|
Same
store sales |
|
Total sales at constant
exchange rates (1) |
|
Total
sales |
|||||
|
H.Samuel
|
£
|
245.0
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
(13.9
|
)%
|
|
Ernest Jones
|
244.4
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
(10.6
|
)%
|
|
|
UK Jewelry
|
£
|
489.4
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
(12.3
|
)%
|
|
(1)
|
Non-GAAP measure, see Item 6.
|
H.Samuel
H.Samuel accounted for
5%
of Signet’s sales in
Fiscal 2017
(
Fiscal 2016
: 6%), and is the largest specialty retail jewelry store brand in the UK by number of stores. H.Samuel has 150 years of jewelry heritage, with a target customer focused on inexpensive fashion-trend oriented, everyday jewelry. The typical store selling space is 1,100 square feet.
H.Samuel continues to focus on larger store formats in regional shopping centers. Details of H.Samuel’s performance over the last three years is shown below:
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Sales (millions)
|
£
|
245.0
|
|
|
£
|
247.4
|
|
|
£
|
240.3
|
|
|
Average sales per store (millions)
|
£
|
0.748
|
|
|
£
|
0.763
|
|
|
£
|
0.760
|
|
|
Stores at year end
|
304
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
302
|
|
|||
|
Total net selling square feet (thousands)
|
329
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
327
|
|
|||
Ernest Jones
Ernest Jones (including stores selling under the Leslie Davis nameplate) accounted for
5%
of Signet’s sales in
Fiscal 2017
(
Fiscal 2016
: 6%), and is the second largest specialty retail jewelry store brand in the UK by number of stores. It serves the upper middle market, with a target customer focused on high-quality, timeless jewelry. The typical store selling space is 900 square feet. Details of Ernest Jones’ performance over the last three years is shown below:
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Sales (millions)
|
£
|
244.4
|
|
|
£
|
237.9
|
|
|
£
|
217.8
|
|
|
Average sales per store (millions)
|
£
|
1.114
|
|
|
£
|
1.142
|
|
|
£
|
1.092
|
|
|
Stores at year end
|
204
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
196
|
|
|||
|
Total net selling square feet (thousands)
|
197
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
185
|
|
|||
UK Jewelry operating review
Customer finance
In
Fiscal 2017
, approximately
8%
of the division’s sales were made through a customer finance program provided through a third party (
Fiscal 2016
:
7%
). Signet does not provide this service itself in the UK due to low demand for customer finance.
OTHER
Other consists of all non-reportable operating segments, including activities related to the direct sourcing of rough diamonds, and is aggregated with unallocated corporate administrative functions.
22
IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE
Signet recognizes that climate change is a major risk to society and therefore continues to take steps to reduce Signet’s climatic impact. Management believes that climate change has a largely indirect influence on Signet’s performance and that it is of limited significance to the business.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Signet files annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and other information with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Prior to February 1, 2010, Signet filed annual reports on Form 20-F and furnished other reports on Form 6-K with the SEC. Such information, and amendments to reports previously filed or furnished, is available free of charge from our corporate website, www.signetjewelers.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are filed with or furnished to the SEC. The public also may read and copy any of these filings at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-732-0330. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains the Company’s filings.
23
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
A decline in consumer spending may unfavorably impact Signet’s future sales and earnings.
Jewelry purchases are discretionary and are dependent on consumers’ perceptions of general economic conditions, particularly as jewelry is often perceived to be a luxury purchase. Adverse changes in the economy and periods when discretionary spending by consumers may be under pressure could unfavorably impact sales and earnings. We may respond by increasing discounts or initiating marketing promotions to reduce excess inventory, which could have a material adverse effect on our margins and operating results.
The success of Signet’s operations depends to a significant extent upon a number of factors relating to discretionary consumer spending. These include economic conditions, and perceptions of such conditions by consumers, consumer confidence, level of customer traffic in shopping malls and other retail centers, employment, the level of consumers’ disposable income, business conditions, interest rates, consumer debt and asset values, availability of credit and levels of taxation for the economy as a whole and in regional and local markets where we operate.
As
10%
of Signet’s sales are accounted for by its UK Jewelry division, economic conditions in the eurozone have a significant impact on the UK economy even though the UK is not a member of the eurozone. Therefore, developments in the eurozone could adversely impact trading in the UK Jewelry division, as well as adversely impact the US economy.
Global economic conditions and regulatory changes following the United Kingdom’s announced intention to exit from the European Union could adversely impact Signet’s business and results of operations located in, or closely associated with, the United Kingdom.
In June 2016, a majority of voters in the United Kingdom elected to withdraw from the European Union (often referred to as Brexit) in a national referendum. The referendum was advisory, and the terms of any withdrawal are subject to a negotiation period that could last at least two years after the government of the United Kingdom formally initiates a withdrawal process. This will be either accompanied or followed by negotiations between the European Union and the United Kingdom concerning the future relations between the parties. Nevertheless, the referendum has created significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union. This includes uncertainty with respect to the laws and regulations, including regulations applicable to Signet’s business that will apply in the United Kingdom in the event of a withdrawal. The referendum has also given rise to calls for the governments of other European Union member states to consider a referendum on withdrawal from the European Union for their territory. These developments, or the perception that any of them could occur, could adversely impact global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, and may significantly reduce global market liquidity and restrict the ability of key market participants to operate in certain financial markets. Any of these factors could depress economic activity, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations especially those located in, or closely associated with, the United Kingdom. Brexit could lead to long-term volatility in the currency markets and there could be long-term detrimental effects on the value of the British Pound. Brexit could also impact other currencies. Signet uses foreign currency derivative instruments to hedge certain exposures to currency exchange rate risks. The results of the Brexit referendum could increase Signet’s exposure to foreign currency rate exchange risks and reduce its ability to effectively use certain derivative instruments as a way to hedge risks.
Any deterioration in consumers’ financial position or changes to the regulatory requirements regarding the granting of credit to customers could adversely impact the Company’s sales, earnings and the collectability of accounts receivable.
More than half of Signet’s sales in the US and Canada utilize its in-house or third-party customer financing programs and an additional 35% of purchases are made using third party bank cards. Any significant deterioration in general economic conditions or increase in consumer debt levels may inhibit consumers’ use of credit and decrease consumers’ ability to satisfy Signet’s requirement for access to customer finance and could in turn have an adverse effect on the Company’s sales. Furthermore, any downturn in general or local economic conditions, in particular an increase in unemployment in the markets in which the Signet operates, may adversely affect its collection of outstanding accounts receivable, its net bad debt charge and hence earnings.
Additionally, Signet’s ability to extend credit to customers and the terms on which it is achieved depends on many factors, including compliance with applicable laws and regulations in the US and Canada, any of which may change from time to time, and such changes could adversely affect sales and income. In addition, other restrictions arising from applicable law could cause limitations in credit terms currently offered or a reduction in the level of credit granted by the Company, or by third parties, and this could adversely impact sales, income or cash flow.
The US Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law in July 2010. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act created a Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection with broad rule-making and supervisory authority for a wide range of consumer financial services, including Signet’s customer financing programs. The Bureau’s authority became effective in July 2011. Any new regulatory initiatives by the Bureau could impose additional costs and/or restrictions on credit practices of the Sterling Jewelers and Zale divisions, which could adversely affect their ability to conduct its business.
Signet’s share price may be volatile.
Signet’s share price may fluctuate substantially as a result of variations in the actual or anticipated results and financial conditions of Signet and other companies in the retail industry. In addition, the stock market has experienced price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many retail and other stocks in a manner unrelated, or disproportionate, to the operating performance of these companies.
24
Signet provides public guidance on its expected operating and financial results for future periods. Although Signet believes that this guidance provides investors and analysts with a better understanding of management’s expectations for the future and is useful to its stockholders and potential stockholders, such guidance is comprised of forward-looking statements subject to the risks and uncertainties described in this report and in our other public filings and public statements. Signet’s actual results may not always be in line with or exceed the provided guidance or the expectations of our investors and analysts, especially in times of economic uncertainty. In the past, when the Company has reduced its previously provided guidance, the market price of Signet’s common stock has declined. If, in the future, Signet’s operating or financial results for a particular period do not meet our guidance or the expectations of our investors and analysts or if we reduce our guidance for future periods, the market price of our common stock may decline.
In addition, Signet may fail to meet the expectations of its stockholders or of analysts at some time in the future. If the analysts that regularly follow the Company’s stock lower their rating or lower their projections for future growth and financial performance, the Company’s stock price could decline.
Signet’s sales, operating income, cash and inventory levels fluctuate on a seasonal basis.
Signet’s business is highly seasonal, with a significant proportion of its sales and operating profit generated during its fourth quarter, which includes the Holiday Season. Management expects to continue to experience a seasonal fluctuation in its sales and earnings. Therefore, there is limited ability to compensate for shortfalls in fourth quarter sales or earnings by changes in its operations and strategies in other quarters, or to recover from any extensive disruption, for example, due to sudden adverse changes in consumer confidence, inclement weather conditions having an impact on a significant number of stores in the last few days immediately before Christmas Day or disruption to warehousing and store replenishment systems. A significant shortfall in results for the fourth quarter of any fiscal year would therefore be expected to have a material adverse effect on the annual results of operations. Disruption at lesser peaks in sales at Valentine’s Day and Mother’s Day would be expected to impact the results to a lesser extent. Additionally, in anticipation of increased sales activity in the Holiday Season, Signet incurs certain significant incremental expenses prior to and during peak selling seasons, including advertising and costs associated with hiring a substantial number of temporary employees to supplement our existing workforce.
Deterioration in the Company’s capital structure or financial performance could result in constraints on capital or financial covenant breaches. In addition, a portion of the Company’s debt is variable rate and volatility in benchmark interest rates could adversely impact the Company’s financial results.
While Signet has a strong balance sheet with adequate liquidity to meet its operating requirements, the credit ratings agencies periodically review our capital structure and the quality and stability of our earnings. A deterioration in Signet’s capital structure or the quality and stability of earnings could result in a downgrade of Signet’s credit rating. Any negative ratings actions could also constrain the capital available to the Company, could limit the Company’s access to funding for its operations, funding dividends and share repurchases, and increase the Company’s financing costs. Changes in general credit market conditions could also affect Signet’s ability to access capital at rates and on terms we determine to be attractive. If our ability to access capital becomes constrained, our interest costs will likely increase, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Additionally, as a result of the Company’s exposure to variable interest rate debt, volatility in benchmark interest rates could adversely impact the Company’s financial results.
Signet’s borrowing agreements include various financial covenants and operating restrictions. A material deterioration in its financial performance could result in a covenant being breached. If Signet were to breach, or believed it was going to breach, a financial covenant it would have to renegotiate its terms with current lenders or find alternative sources of financing if current lenders required cancellation of facilities or early repayment.
Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates could adversely impact the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
Signet publishes its consolidated annual financial statements in US dollars. At
January 28, 2017
, Signet held approximately
91%
of its total assets in entities whose functional currency is the US dollar and generated approximately
86%
of its sales and
94%
of its operating income in US dollars for the fiscal year then ended. All the remaining assets, sales and operating income are in UK British pounds and Canadian dollars. Therefore, the Company’s results of operations and balance sheet are subject to fluctuations in the exchange rates between the US dollar and both the British pound and Canadian dollar. Accordingly, any decrease in the weighted average value of the British pound or Canadian dollar against the US dollar would decrease reported sales and operating income.
The monthly average exchange rates are used to prepare the income statement and are calculated based on the daily exchange rates experienced by the UK Jewelry division and the Canadian subsidiaries of the Zale division in the fiscal month.
Where British pounds or Canadian dollars are held or used to fund the cash flow requirements of the business, any decrease in the weighted average value of the British pound or Canadian dollar against the US dollar would reduce the amount of cash and cash equivalents.
In addition, the prices of certain materials and products bought on the international markets by Signet are denominated in foreign currencies. As a result, Signet and its subsidiaries have exposures to exchange rate fluctuations on its cost of goods sold, as well as volatility of input prices if foreign manufacturers and suppliers are impacted by exchange rate fluctuations.
25
Fluctuations in the availability and pricing of commodities, particularly polished diamonds and gold, which account for the majority of Signet’s merchandise costs, could adversely impact its earnings and cash availability.
The jewelry industry generally is affected by fluctuations in the price and supply of diamonds, gold and, to a lesser extent, other precious and semi-precious metals and stones. In particular, diamonds accounted for about
45%
, and gold about
14%
, of Signet’s merchandise costs in
Fiscal 2017
.
In
Fiscal 2017
, prices for the assortment of polished diamonds utilized by Signet decreased slightly compared to prior year. Industry forecasts indicate that over the medium and longer term, the demand for diamonds will probably increase faster than the growth in supply, particularly as a result of growing demand in countries such as China and India. Therefore, the cost of diamonds is anticipated to rise over time, although fluctuations in price are likely to continue to occur. The mining, production and inventory policies followed by major producers of rough diamonds can have a significant impact on diamond prices, as can the inventory and buying patterns of jewelry retailers and other parties in the supply chain.
While jewelry manufacturing is the major final demand for gold, management believes that the cost of gold is predominantly impacted by investment transactions which have resulted in significant volatility in the gold price in recent years. Signet’s cost of merchandise and potentially its earnings may be adversely impacted by investment market considerations that cause the price of gold to significantly escalate.
The availability of diamonds is significantly influenced by the political situation in diamond producing countries and by the Kimberley Process, an inter-governmental agreement for the international trading of rough diamonds. Until acceptable alternative sources of diamonds can be developed, any sustained interruption in the supply of diamonds from significant producing countries, or to the trading in rough and polished diamonds which could occur as a result of disruption to the Kimberley Process, could adversely affect Signet, as well as the retail jewelry market as a whole. In addition, the current Kimberley Process decision making procedure is dependent on reaching a consensus among member governments, which can result in the protracted resolution of issues, and there is little expectation of significant reform over the long-term. The impact of this review process on the supply of diamonds, and consumers’ perception of the diamond supply chain, is unknown. In addition to the Kimberley Process, the supply of diamonds to the US is also impacted by certain governmental trade sanctions imposed on Zimbabwe.
The possibility of constraints in the supply of diamonds of a size and quality Signet requires to meet its merchandising requirements may result in changes in Signet’s supply chain practices, for example its rough sourcing initiative. In addition, Signet may from time to time choose to hold more inventory, purchase raw materials at an earlier stage in the supply chain or enter into commercial agreements of a nature that it currently does not use. Such actions could require the investment of cash and/or additional management skills. Such actions may not result in the expected returns and other projected benefits anticipated by management.
An inability to increase retail prices to reflect higher commodity costs would result in lower profitability. Historically, jewelry retailers have been able, over time, to increase prices to reflect changes in commodity costs. However, in general, particularly sharp increases in commodity costs may result in a time lag before increased commodity costs are fully reflected in retail prices. As Signet uses an average cost inventory methodology, volatility in its commodity costs may also result in a time lag before cost increases are reflected in retail prices. There is no certainty that such price increases will be sustainable, so downward pressure on gross margins and earnings may occur. In addition, any sustained increases in the cost of commodities could result in the need to fund a higher level of inventory or changes in the merchandise available to the customer.
In August 2012, the SEC, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, issued final rules, which require annual disclosure and reporting on the source and use of certain minerals, including gold, from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries. The gold supply chain is complex and, while management believes that the rules currently cover less than 1% of annual worldwide gold production (based upon recent estimates), the final rules require Signet and other affected companies that file with the SEC to make specified country of origin inquiries of our suppliers, and otherwise to exercise reasonable due diligence in determining the country of origin and certain other information relating to any of the statutorily designated minerals (gold, tin, tantalum and tungsten), that are used in products sold by Signet in the US and elsewhere. On May 27, 2016, Signet filed with the SEC its Form Specialized Disclosure (“SD”) and accompanying Conflict Minerals Report in accordance with the SEC’s rules, which together describe our country of origin inquiries and due diligence measures relating to the source and chain of custody of those designated minerals Signet deemed necessary to the functionality or production of our products, the results of those activities and our related determinations with respect to the calendar year ended December 31, 2015.
There may be reputational risks associated with the potential negative response of our customers and other stakeholders to future disclosures by Signet in the event that, due to the complexity of the global supply chain, Signet is unable to sufficiently verify the origin of the relevant metals. Also, if future responses to verification requests by suppliers of any of the covered minerals used in our products are inadequate or adverse, Signet’s ability to obtain merchandise may be impaired and our compliance costs may increase. The final rules also cover tungsten and tin, which are contained in a small proportion of items that are sold by Signet. It is possible that other minerals, such as diamonds, could be subject to similar rules.
Price increases may have an adverse impact on Signet’s performance.
If significant price increases are implemented, by any division or across a wide range of merchandise, the impact on earnings will depend on, among other factors, the pricing by competitors of similar products in the same geographic area and the response by customers to higher prices. Such price increases may result in lower sales and adversely impact earnings.
26
Signet’s competitors are specialty jewelry retailers, as well as other jewelry retailers, including department stores, mass merchandisers, discount stores, apparel and accessory fashion stores, brand retailers, shopping clubs, home shopping television channels, direct home sellers, online retailers and auction sites. In addition, other retail categories and other forms of expenditure, such as electronics and travel, also compete for consumers’ discretionary expenditure, particularly during the holiday gift giving season. Therefore, the price of jewelry relative to other products influences the proportion of consumers’ expenditure that is spent on jewelry. If the relative price of jewelry increases, Signet’s sales and earnings may decline.
The Company’s ability to satisfy the accounting requirements for “hedge accounting,” or the default or insolvency of a counterparty to a hedging contract, could adversely impact results.
Signet hedges a portion of its purchases of gold for both its Sterling Jewelers and UK Jewelry divisions and hedges the US dollar requirements of its UK Jewelry division. The failure to satisfy the requirements of the appropriate accounting requirements, or a default or insolvency of a counterparty to a contract, could increase the volatility of results and may impact the timing of recognition of gains and losses in the income statement.
The Company’s inability to obtain merchandise that customers wish to purchase, particularly ahead of and during the fourth quarter, could adversely impact sales.
The abrupt loss or disruption of any significant supplier during the three month period (August to October) leading up to the fourth quarter could result in a material adverse effect on Signet’s business.
Also, if management misjudges expected customer demand or fails to identify changes in customer demand and/or its supply chain does not respond in a timely manner, it could adversely impact Signet’s results by causing either a shortage of merchandise or an accumulation of excess inventory.
Signet benefits from close commercial relationships with a number of suppliers. Damage to, or loss of, any of these relationships could have a detrimental effect on results. Management holds regular reviews with major suppliers. Signet’s most significant supplier accounts for
5.5%
of merchandise. Government requirements regarding sources of commodities, such as those required by the Dodd-Frank Act, could result in Signet choosing to terminate relationships with suppliers in the future due to a change in a supplier’s sourcing practices or Signet’s compliance with laws and internal policies.
Luxury and prestige watch manufacturers and distributors normally grant agencies the right to sell their ranges on a store-by-store basis. The watch brands sold by Ernest Jones, and to a lesser extent Jared, help attract customers and build sales in all categories. Therefore, an inability to obtain or retain watch agencies for a location could harm the performance of that particular store. In the case of Ernest Jones, the inability to gain additional prestige watch agencies is an important factor in, and may reduce the likelihood of, opening new stores, which could adversely impact sales growth.
The growth in importance of branded merchandise within the jewelry market may adversely impact Signet’s sales and earnings if it is unable to obtain supplies of branded merchandise that the customer wishes to purchase. In addition, if Signet loses the distribution rights to an important branded jewelry range, it could adversely impact sales and earnings.
Signet has had success in recent years in the development of branded merchandise that is exclusive to its stores. If Signet is not able to further develop such branded merchandise, or is unable to successfully develop further such initiatives, it may adversely impact sales and earnings.
The Company’s ability to recruit, train, motivate and retain suitably qualified sales associates could adversely impact sales and earnings.
Management regards the customer experience as an essential element in the success of its business. Competition for suitable individuals or changes in labor and healthcare laws could require us to incur higher labor costs. Therefore an inability to recruit, train, motivate and retain suitably qualified sales associates could adversely impact sales and earnings.
Loss of confidence by consumers in Signet’s brand names, poor execution of marketing programs and reduced marketing expenditure could have a detrimental impact on sales.
Primary factors in determining customer buying decisions in the jewelry sector include customer confidence in the retailer and in the brands it sells, together with the level and quality of customer service. The ability to differentiate Signet’s stores and merchandise from competitors by its branding, marketing and advertising programs is an important factor in attracting consumers. If these programs are poorly executed, the level of support for them is reduced, or the customer loses confidence in any of Signet’s brands for whatever reason, it could unfavorably impact sales and earnings.
Long-term changes in consumer attitudes to jewelry could be unfavorable and harm jewelry sales.
Consumer attitudes to diamonds, gold and other precious metals and gemstones also influence the level of Signet’s sales. Attitudes could be affected by a variety of issues including concern over the source of raw materials; the impact of mining and refining of minerals on the environment, the local community and the political stability of the producing country; labor conditions in the supply chain; and the availability of and consumer attitudes to substitute products such as cubic zirconia, moissanite and laboratory-created diamonds. A negative change in consumer attitudes to jewelry could adversely impact sales and earnings.
27
The retail jewelry industry is highly fragmented and competitive.
The retail jewelry industry is competitive. If Signet’s competitive position deteriorates, operating results or financial condition could be adversely affected.
Aggressive discounting by competitors may adversely impact Signet’s performance in the short term. This is particularly the case for easily comparable pieces of jewelry, of similar quality, sold through stores that are situated near to those that Signet operates.
Signet faces significant competition from independent and regional specialty jewelry retailers that are able to adjust their competitive stance, for example on pricing, to local market conditions. This can put individual Signet stores at a competitive disadvantage as Signet division’s have a national pricing strategy.
The Company’s inability to rent stores that satisfy management’s operational and financial criteria could adversely impact sales, as could changes in locations where customers shop.
Signet’s results are dependent on a number of factors relating to its stores. These include the availability of desirable property, the demographic characteristics of the area around the store, the design and maintenance of the stores, the availability of attractive locations within the shopping center that also meet the operational and financial criteria of management, the terms of leases and Signet’s relationship with major landlords. If Signet is unable to rent stores that satisfy its operational
and financial criteria, or if there is a disruption in its relationship with its major landlords, sales could be adversely affected.
Given the length of property leases that Signet enters into, it is dependent upon the continued popularity of particular retail locations. As Signet tests and develops new types of store locations and designs, there is no certainty as to their success. The majority of long-term space growth opportunities in the US are in new developments and therefore future store space is in part dependent on the investment by real estate developers in new projects. Limited new real estate development taking place would make it challenging to identify and secure suitable new store locations. The UK Jewelry division has a more diverse range of store locations than in the US or Canada, including some exposure to smaller retail centers which do not justify the investment required to refurbish the site to the current store format. Consequently, the UK Jewelry division is gradually closing stores in such locations as leases expire or satisfactory property transactions can be executed; however, the ability to secure such property transactions is not certain.
The rate of new store development is dependent on a number of factors including obtaining suitable real estate, the capital resources of Signet, the availability of appropriate staff and management and the level of the financial return on investment required by management.
Signet’s success is dependent on the strength and effectiveness of its relationships with its various stakeholders whose behavior may be affected by its management of social, ethical and environmental risks.
Social, ethical and environmental matters influence Signet’s reputation, demand for merchandise by consumers, the ability to recruit staff, relations with suppliers and standing in the financial markets. Signet’s success is dependent on the strength and effectiveness of its relationships with its various stakeholders: customers, shareholders, employees and suppliers. In recent years, stakeholder expectations have increased and Signet’s success and reputation will depend on its ability to meet these higher expectations. Signet’s success also depends upon its reputation for integrity in sourcing its merchandise, which, if adversely affected could impact consumer sentiment and willingness to purchase Signet’s merchandise.
Inadequacies in and disruption to systems could result in lower sales and increased costs or adversely impact the reporting and control procedures.
Signet is dependent on the suitability, reliability and durability of its systems and procedures, including its accounting, information technology, data protection, warehousing and distribution systems, and those of our service providers. If support ceased for a critical externally supplied software package or system, management would have to implement an alternative software package or system or begin supporting the software internally. Disruption to parts of the business could result in lower sales and increased costs.
Signet is in the process of substantially modifying our enterprise resource planning systems, which involves updating or replacing legacy systems with successor systems over the course of several years. These system changes and upgrades can require significant capital investments and dedication of resources. While Signet follows a disciplined methodology when evaluating and making such changes, there can be no assurances that the Company will successfully implement such changes, that such changes will occur without disruptions to its operations or that the new or upgraded systems will achieve the desired business objectives. Any damage, disruption or shutdown of the Company’s information systems, or the failure to successfully implement new or upgraded systems, could have a direct material adverse effect on Signet’s results of operations.
An inability to successfully develop and maintain a relevant omni-channel experience for customers could adversely impact Signet’s business and results of operations.
Signet’s business has evolved from an in-store experience to interaction with customers across numerous channels, including in-store, online, mobile and social media, among others. Omni-channel retailing is rapidly evolving and Signet must keep pace with changing customer expectations and new developments by our competitors. Our customers are increasingly using computers, tablets, mobile phones and other devices to comparison shop, determine product availability and complete purchases online. Signet must compete by offering a consistent and convenient shopping experience for our customers regardless of the ultimate sales channel and by investing in, providing and maintaining digital tools for our customers
28
that have the right features and are reliable and easy to use. If Signet is unable to make, improve or develop relevant customer-facing technology in a timely manner, the Company’s ability to compete and its results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, if Signet’s online activities or other customer-facing technology systems do not function as designed, the Company may experience a loss of customer confidence, data security breaches, lost sales or be exposed to fraudulent purchases, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business operations, reputation and results of operations.
Security breaches and other disruptions to Signet’s information technology infrastructure and databases could interfere with Signet’s operations, and could compromise Signet’s and its customers’ and suppliers’ information, exposing Signet to liability which would cause Signet’s business and reputation to suffer.
Signet operates in multiple channels and, in the Sterling Jewelers division, maintains its own customer financing operation. Signet is also increasingly using mobile devices, social media and other online activities to connect with customers, staff and other stakeholders. Therefore, in the ordinary course of business, Signet relies upon information technology networks and systems, some of which are managed by third parties, to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes and activities, including eCommerce sales, supply chain, merchandise distribution, customer invoicing and collection of payments. Signet uses information technology systems to record, process and summarize financial information and results of operations for internal reporting purposes and to comply with regulatory financial reporting, legal and tax requirements. Additionally, Signet collects and stores sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary business information, the propriety business information of our customers and suppliers, as well as personally identifiable information of Signet’s customers and employees, in data centers and on information technology networks. The secure operation of these networks, and the processing and maintenance of this information is critical to Signet’s business operations and strategy. Despite security measures and business continuity plans, we may not timely anticipate evolving techniques used to effect security breaches that may result in damage, disruptions or shutdowns of Signet’s and our third-party vendors’ networks and infrastructure due to attacks by hackers, including phishing or other cyber-attacks, or breaches due to employee error or malfeasance, or other disruptions during the process of upgrading or replacing computer software or hardware, power outages, computer viruses, telecommunication or utility failures or natural disasters or other catastrophic events. The occurrence of any of these events could compromise Signet’s networks and the information stored there, including personal, proprietary or confidential information about Signet, our customers or our third-party vendors, and personally identifiable information of Signet’s customers and employees could be accessed, manipulated, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen, exposing our customers to the risk of identity theft and exposing Signet or our third-party vendors to a risk of loss or misuse of this information. To date, these attacks or breaches have not had a material impact on Signet’s business or operations; however, any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of personal information, significant breach-notification costs, lost sales and a disruption to operations (including our ability to process consumer transactions and manage inventories), media attention, and damage to Signet’s reputation, which could adversely affect Signet’s business. In addition, it could harm Signet’s reputation and ability to execute its business through service and business interruptions, management distraction and/or damage to physical infrastructure, which could adversely impact sales, costs and earnings. If Signet is the target of a cybersecurity attack resulting in unauthorized disclosure of our customer data, we may be required to undertake costly notification and credit monitoring procedures. Compliance with these laws will likely increase the costs of doing business.
The regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and privacy is becoming increasingly demanding, with new and changing requirements applicable to Signet’s business, and compliance with those requirements could result in additional costs, such as costs related to organizational changes, implementing additional protection technologies, training employees and engaging consultants.
These risks could have a material adverse effect on Signet’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.
An adverse decision in legal proceedings and/or tax matters could reduce earnings.
Signet is involved in legal proceedings incidental to its business. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. Any claims against us, whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, require significant amounts of management time and result in the diversion of significant operational resources.
In March 2008, private plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit for an unspecified amount against Sterling Jewelers Inc. (“Sterling”), a subsidiary of Signet, in US District Court for the Southern District of New York, which has been referred to private arbitration. In September 2008, the US Equal Employment Opportunities Commission filed a lawsuit against Sterling in US District Court for the Western District of New York. Sterling denies the allegations from both parties and has been defending these cases vigorously. If, however, it is unsuccessful in either defense, Sterling could be required to pay substantial damages. At this point, no outcome or amount of loss is able to be estimated. See Note
25
in Item 8.
In August 2016, individual plaintiffs filed putative class actions asserting claims under the federal securities laws in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company and its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer seeking an unspecified amount of damages. The cases were consolidated and an amended complaint was filed in January 2017. Plaintiffs sought leave from court which was granted to file a second amended complaint. Signet denies the current allegations and intends to defend the case vigorously. If, however, it is unsuccessful in its defense, Signet could be required to pay substantial damages. At this point, no outcome or amount of loss is able to be estimated. See Note
25
in Item 8.
29
At any point in time, various tax years are subject to, or are in the process of, audit by various taxing authorities. To the extent that management’s estimates of settlements change or the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact income tax in the period in which such determinations are made.
Failure to comply with labor regulations could adversely affect the Company’s business.
State, federal and global laws and regulations regarding employment change frequently and the ultimate cost of compliance cannot be precisely estimated. Failure by Signet to comply with labor regulations could result in fines and legal actions. In addition, the ability to recruit and retain staff could be harmed.
Collective bargaining activity could disrupt the Company’s operations, increase our labor costs or interfere with the ability of our management to focus on executing our business strategies.
The employees of our diamond polishing factory in Garborone, Botswana are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. If relationships with these employees become adverse, operations at the factory could experience labor disruptions such as strikes, lockouts, boycotts and public demonstrations. Labor regulation and the negotiation of new or existing collective bargaining agreements could lead to higher wage and benefit costs, changes in work rules that raise operating expenses, legal costs and limitations on our ability to take cost saving measures during economic downturns.
The Company’s ability to comply with changes in laws and regulations could adversely affect our business.
Signet’s policies and procedures are designed to comply with all applicable laws and regulations. Changing legal and regulatory requirements in the US and other jurisdictions in which Signet operates have increased the complexity of the regulatory environment in which the business operates and the cost of compliance. Failure to comply with the various regulatory requirements may result in damage to Signet’s reputation, civil and criminal liability, fines and penalties, and further increase the cost of regulatory compliance.
Changes in existing taxation benefits, rules or practices may adversely affect the Company’s financial results.
The Company operates through various subsidiaries in numerous countries throughout the world. Consequently, Signet is subject to changes in tax laws, treaties or regulations or the interpretation or enforcement thereof in the United States or jurisdictions where any subsidiaries operate or are incorporated. Tax laws, treaties and regulations are highly complex and subject to interpretation. The Company’s income tax expense is based upon interpretation of the tax laws in effect in various countries at the time such expense was incurred. If these tax laws, treaties or regulations were to change or any tax authority were to successfully challenge our assessment of the effects of such laws, treaties and regulations in any country, this could result in a higher effective tax rate on the Company’s taxable earnings, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.
In addition, the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (“OECD”) has published an action plan seeking multilateral cooperation to reform the taxation of multinational companies. Countries already have begun to implement some of these action items, and likely will continue to adopt more of them over the next several years. This may result in unilateral or uncoordinated local country application of the action items. Any such inconsistencies in the tax laws of countries where the Company operates or is incorporated may lead to increased uncertainty with respect to tax positions or otherwise increase the potential for double taxation. Proposals for U.S. tax reform also potentially could have a significant adverse effect on us. In addition, the European Commission has conducted investigations in multiple countries focusing on whether local country tax legislation or rulings provide preferential tax treatment in violation of European Union state aid rules. Any impacts of these actions could increase the Company’s tax liabilities, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
The Parent Company is incorporated in Bermuda. The directors intend to conduct the Parent Company’s affairs such that, based on current law and practice of the relevant tax authorities, the Parent Company will not become
resident for tax purposes in any other territory. At the present time, there is no Bermuda income or profits tax, withholding tax, capital gains tax, capital transfer tax, estate duty or inheritance tax payable by the Parent Company or by its shareholders in respect of its common shares. The Parent Company has obtained an assurance from the Minister of Finance of Bermuda under the Exempted Undertakings Tax Protection Act 1966 that, in the event that any legislation is enacted in Bermuda imposing any tax computed on profits or income, or computed on any capital asset, gain or appreciation or any tax in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax, such tax shall not, until March 31, 2035, be applicable to it or to any of its operations or to its shares, debentures or other obligations except insofar as such tax applies to persons ordinarily resident in Bermuda or is payable by it in respect of real property owned or leased by it in Bermuda. Given the limited duration of the Minister of Finance’s assurance, the Parent Company cannot be certain that it will not be subject to Bermuda tax after March 31, 2035. In the event the Parent Company were to become subject to any Bermuda tax after such date, it could have a material adverse effect on the Parent Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
Likewise, Signet’s non-U.S. subsidiaries operate in a manner that they should not be subject to U.S. income tax because none of them should be treated as engaged in a trade or business in the U.S. If, despite this, the IRS were to successfully contend that the Parent Company or any of its non-U.S. subsidiaries are engaged in a trade or business in the U.S., such entity could be subject to U.S. corporate income and branch profits taxes on the portion of its earnings effectively connected to such U.S. business, which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.
30
Investors may face difficulties in enforcing proceedings against Signet Jewelers Limited as it is domiciled in Bermuda.
It is doubtful whether courts in Bermuda would enforce judgments obtained by investors in other jurisdictions, including the US, Canada and the UK, against the Parent Company or its directors or officers under the securities laws of those jurisdictions or entertain actions in Bermuda against the Parent Company or its directors or officers under the securities laws of other jurisdictions.
Any difficulty executing or integrating an acquisition, a business combination or a major business initiative may result in expected returns and other projected benefits from such an exercise not being realized.
Any difficulty in executing or integrating an acquisition, a business combination or a major business initiative, including our direct diamond sourcing capabilities, may result in expected returns and other projected benefits from such an
exercise not being realized. The acquisition of companies with operating margins lower than that of Signet may cause an overall lower operating margin for Signet. A significant transaction could also disrupt the operation of our current activities and divert significant management time and resources. Signet’s current borrowing agreements place certain limited constraints on our ability to make an acquisition or enter into a business combination, and future borrowing agreements could place tighter constraints on such actions.
Additional indebtedness relating to the acquisition of Zale Corporation reduces the availability of cash to fund other business initiatives.
Signet’s additional indebtedness to fund the acquisition of Zale Corporation has significantly increased Signet’s outstanding debt. This additional indebtedness requires us to dedicate a portion of our cash flow to servicing this debt, which may impact the availability of cash to fund other business initiatives, including dividends and share repurchases. Significant changes to Signet’s financial condition as a result of global economic changes or difficulties in the integration or execution of strategies of the acquired business may affect our ability to satisfy the financial covenants included in the terms of the financing arrangements.
Failure to successfully combine Signet’s and Zale Corporation’s businesses in the expected time frame may adversely affect the future results of the combined company, and there is no assurance that we will be able to fully achieve integration-related efficiencies or that those achieved will offset transaction-related costs.
The success of the transaction will depend, in part, on our ability to successfully combine the Signet and Zale businesses in order to realize the anticipated benefits and synergies from combination. If the combined company is not able to achieve these objectives, or is not able to achieve these objectives on a timely basis, the anticipated benefits of the transaction may not be realized fully. In addition, we have incurred a number of substantial transaction and integration-related costs associated with completing the transaction, combining the operations of the two companies and taking steps to achieve desired synergies. Transaction costs include, but are not limited to, fees paid to legal, financial, accounting and integration advisors, regulatory filing fees and printing costs. Additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the integration of our and Zale Corporation’s businesses. There can be no assurance that the realization of other efficiencies related to the integration of the two businesses, as well as the elimination of certain duplicative costs, will offset the incremental transaction-related costs over time. Thus, any net benefit may not be achieved in the near term, the long term, or at all.
Additionally, these integration difficulties could result in declines in the market value of our common stock.
The Company’s ability to protect intellectual property could have a negative impact on our brands, reputation and operating results.
Signet’s trade names, trademarks, copyrights, patents and other intellectual property are important assets and an essential element of the Company’s strategy. The unauthorized reproduction, theft or misappropriation of Signet’s intellectual property could diminish the value of its brands or reputation and cause a decline in sales. Protection of Signet’s intellectual property and maintenance of distinct branding are particularly important as they distinguish our products and services from those of our competitors. The costs of defending our intellectual property may adversely affect the Company’s operating results. In addition, any infringement or other intellectual property claim made against Signet, whether or not it has merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product delays, or require the Company to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. As a result, any such claim could have a material adverse effect on Signet’s operating results.
If the Company’s goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to record significant charges to earnings.
We have a substantial amount of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on our balance sheet as a result of the Zale Corporation acquisition. We review goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. Application of the impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assignment of assets, liabilities and goodwill to reporting units, and the determination of fair value of each reporting unit. There is a risk that a significant deterioration in a key estimate or assumption or a less significant deterioration to a combination of assumptions or the sale of a part of a reporting unit could result in an impairment charge in the future, which could have a significant adverse impact on our reported earnings.
For further information on our testing for goodwill impairment, see “Critical Accounting Policies” under Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
31
Loss of one or more key executive officers or employees could adversely impact performance, as could the appointment of an inappropriate successor or successors.
Signet’s future success will partly depend upon the ability of senior management and other key employees to implement an appropriate business strategy. While Signet has entered into termination protection agreements with such key personnel, the retention of their services cannot be guaranteed and the loss of such services could have a material adverse effect on Signet’s ability to conduct its business. Competition for key personnel in the retail industry is intense, and Signet’s future success will also depend on our ability to attract and retain talented personnel. In addition, any new executives may wish, subject to Board approval, to change the strategy of Signet. The appointment of new executives may therefore adversely impact performance.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The following table provides the location, use and size of our distribution, corporate and other non-retail facilities required to support the Company’s global operations as of
January 28, 2017
:
|
Location
|
|
Function
|
|
Approximate square footage
|
|
Lease or Own
|
|
Lease expiration
|
|
|
Akron, Ohio
(1)
|
|
Corporate and distribution
|
|
460,000
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
2047
|
|
Akron, Ohio
|
|
Credit
|
|
86,000
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
2047
|
|
Akron, Ohio
|
|
Training
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
2047
|
|
Akron, Ohio
|
|
Repair Center
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
Own
|
|
N/A
|
|
Akron, Ohio
|
|
Corporate
|
|
34,900
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
2019
|
|
Barberton, Ohio
|
|
Non-merchandise fulfillment
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
2031
|
|
New York City, New York
|
|
Design
|
|
4,600
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
2020
|
|
New York City, New York
|
|
Diamond trading
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
2021
|
|
Irving, Texas
(2)
|
|
Corporate and distribution
|
|
414,000
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
2018
|
|
Toronto, Ontario (Canada)
|
|
Distribution and fulfillment
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
2019
|
|
Birmingham, UK
|
|
Corporate and eCommerce fulfillment
|
|
255,000
|
|
|
Own
|
|
N/A
|
|
Borehamwood, Hertfordshire (UK)
|
|
Corporate and distribution
|
|
36,200
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
2020
|
|
Gaborone, Botswana
|
|
Diamond polishing
|
|
34,200
|
|
|
Own
|
|
N/A
|
|
Mumbai, India
|
|
Diamond liaison
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
2018
|
|
(1)
|
Signet is expanding the Akron headquarters by approximately 80,000 square feet to enhance distribution capabilities. The expansion is scheduled to be open for operation by the end of Fiscal 2018.
|
|
(2)
|
Signet will be relocating the Dallas headquarters to a new 225,000 square foot facility upon expiration of the existing lease for the facility in Irving, Texas. The lease for this new headquarters will expire in 2028. Additionally, Signet is currently building a 31,000 square foot freestanding repair facility in Dallas, Texas, similar to the repair center in Akron, Ohio. It is scheduled to open for operation in March 2017 with the new lease set to expire in 2028.
|
Sufficient distribution exists in all geographies to meet the respective needs of the Company’s operations.
Global retail property
Signet attributes great importance to the location and appearance of its stores. Accordingly, in each of Signet’s divisions, investment decisions on selecting sites and refurbishing stores are made centrally, and strict real estate and investment criteria are applied. Below is a summary of property details by geography for our retail operations as of
January 28, 2017
:
32
|
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
|
Zale division
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
|
Signet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Kay
|
|
Jared
|
|
Regional brands
|
|
Total
|
|
Zales
|
|
Peoples
|
|
Regional
brands |
|
Total Zale
Jewelry |
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
|
Total
|
|
H.Samuel
|
|
Ernest Jones
|
|
Total
|
|
Total
stores |
||||||||||||||
|
US
|
1,192
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
|
Canada
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
Republic of Ireland
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Channel Islands
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Total
|
1,192
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
3,682
|
|
Store locations by US state, Canadian province and Puerto Rico, as of
January 28, 2017
, are as follows:
|
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
|
Zale division
|
|
Signet
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Kay
|
|
Jared
|
|
Regional brands
|
|
Total
|
|
Zales
|
|
Peoples
|
|
Regional
brands |
|
Total Zale
Jewelry |
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
|
Total
|
|
Total Stores
|
|||||||||||
|
Alabama
|
25
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Alaska
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Arizona
|
20
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Arkansas
|
9
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
California
|
79
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
Colorado
|
16
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Connecticut
|
13
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Delaware
|
4
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Florida
|
83
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
Georgia
|
50
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
Hawaii
|
8
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Idaho
|
5
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Illinois
|
45
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
Indiana
|
29
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Iowa
|
18
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Kansas
|
9
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
Kentucky
|
21
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Louisiana
|
17
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Maine
|
6
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Maryland
|
31
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
Massachusetts
|
25
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
Michigan
|
40
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
17
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Mississippi
|
14
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
Missouri
|
22
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Montana
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Nebraska
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Nevada
|
10
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
New Hampshire
|
11
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
New Jersey
|
32
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
New Mexico
|
5
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
21
|
|
33
|
New York
|
67
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
North Carolina
|
46
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
North Dakota
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Ohio
|
66
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
Oklahoma
|
10
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
Oregon
|
16
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
62
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
Rhode Island
|
4
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
South Carolina
|
26
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
South Dakota
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
28
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Texas
|
76
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
Utah
|
10
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Vermont
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Virginia
|
40
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
Washington
|
19
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
West Virginia
|
10
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Wisconsin
|
23
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Wyoming
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
US
|
1,192
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
|
Alberta
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
British Columbia
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
Manitoba
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
New Brunswick
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Newfoundland
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Nova Scotia
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Ontario
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
Prince Edward Island
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Saskatchewan
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Canada
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Total North America
|
1,192
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
3,174
|
|
North America retail property
Signet’s Sterling Jewelers, Zale Jewelry and Piercing Pagoda segments operate stores and kiosks in the US, with substantially all of the locations being leased. In addition to a minimum annual rent cost, the majority of mall stores are also liable to pay rent based on sales above a specified base level. In
Fiscal 2017
, most of the mall stores and kiosks only made base rental payments. Under the terms of a typical lease, the Company is required to conform and maintain its usage to agreed standards, including meeting required advertising expenditure as a percentage of sales, and are responsible for its proportionate share of expenses associated with common area maintenance, utilities and taxes of the mall.
The initial term of a mall store lease is generally ten years for Sterling Jewelers and Zale Jewelry and one to five years for Piercing Pagoda kiosks. Towards the end of a lease, management evaluates whether to renew a lease and refit the store, using similar operational and investment criteria as for a new store. Where management is uncertain whether the location will meet management’s required return on investment, but the store is profitable, the leases may be renewed for one to five years, during which time the store’s performance is further evaluated. There are typically about 250 such mall stores at any one time in the Sterling Jewelers segment, as well as the Zale Jewelry segment. Jared stores are normally opened on 10 to 15 year leases with options to extend the lease, and rents are not sales related. A refurbishment of a Jared store is normally undertaken every five to ten years.
The Zale Jewelry segment operates stores in Canada and Puerto Rico, all under operating leases, with terms and characteristics similar to the US locations described above. The Piercing Pagoda segment operates kiosks in Puerto Rico, all under operating leases, with terms and characteristics similar to the US locations described above.
34
At
January 28, 2017
, the average unexpired lease term of leased premises for the Sterling Jewelers segment was approximately 5 years, and approximately 52% of these leases had terms expiring within five years. The cost of remodeling a mall store is similar to the cost of a new mall store, which is typically between $0.3 million and $0.7 million, depending on the scope of the remodel project. Jared refurbishments typically cost on average less than $0.2 million. New Jared stores typically cost between $2.1 million and $3.1 million. In
Fiscal 2017
, a total of 64 store locations were remodeled (
Fiscal 2016
: 95 locations).
At
January 28, 2017
, the average unexpired lease term of leased premises for the Zale Jewelry and Piercing Pagoda segments was 4 and 2 years, respectively, with approximately 80% of these leases having terms expiring within five years. The cost of remodeling a Zale Jewelry mall store is similar to the cost of a new mall store, which is typically between $0.3 million and $0.7 million. The cost of a new Piercing Pagoda kiosk approximates $0.1 million. In
Fiscal 2017
, store remodels were completed at 42 Zale Jewelry stores and 83 Piercing Pagoda kiosks. In
Fiscal 2016
, store remodels were completed at 45 Zale Jewelry stores and 74 Piercing Pagoda kiosks.
In the US, the Sterling Jewelers, Zale Jewelry and Piercing Pagoda segments collectively lease approximately 20% of store and kiosk locations from a single lessor. In Canada, Zale Jewelry leases approximately 50% of its store locations from four lessors, with no individual lessor relationship exceeding 15% of its store locations. The segments had no other relationship with any lessor relating to 10% or more of its locations.
During the past five fiscal years, the Company generally has been successful in renewing its store leases as they expire and has not experienced difficulty in securing suitable locations for its stores. No store lease is individually material to Signet’s Sterling Jewelers, Zale Jewelry or Piercing Pagoda operations.
UK retail property
The UK Jewelry division’s stores are generally leased under full repairing and insuring leases (equivalent to triple net leases in the US). Wherever possible, Signet is shortening the length of new leases that it enters into, or including break clauses in order to improve the flexibility of its lease commitments. At
January 28, 2017
, the average unexpired lease term of UK Jewelry premises was 5 years, and a majority of leases had either break clauses or terms expiring within five years. Rents are usually subject to upward review every five years if market conditions so warrant. An increasing proportion of rents also have an element related to the sales of a store, subject to a minimum annual value.
At the end of the lease period, subject to certain limited exceptions, UK Jewelry leaseholders generally have statutory rights to enter into a new lease of the premises on negotiated terms. As current leases expire, Signet believes that it will be able to renew leases, if desired, for present store locations or to obtain leases in equivalent or improved locations in the same general area. Signet has not experienced difficulty in securing leases for suitable locations for its UK Jewelry stores. No store lease is individually material to Signet’s UK Jewelry operations.
A typical UK Jewelry store undergoes a major remodel every ten years and a less costly refurbishment every five years. It is intended that these investments will be financed by cash from operating activities. The cost of remodeling a regular store is typically between £150,000 and £600,000 for both H.Samuel and Ernest Jones, while remodels in prestigious locations typically doubles those costs.
The UK Jewelry division has no relationship with any lessor relating to 10% or more of its store locations.
Other
The Company has entered into agreements to assign or sublease certain premises as of
January 28, 2017
. See Note
25
of Item 8 for additional information.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See discussion of legal proceedings in Note
25
of Item 8.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
35
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market and dividend information
The principal trading market for the Company’s common shares is the New York Stock Exchange (symbol: SIG). The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices per common share and the dividends per share declared on the common shares during the periods indicated:
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Dividend
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Dividend
|
|
||||||||||||
|
First quarter
|
$
|
124.03
|
|
|
$
|
94.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
139.78
|
|
|
$
|
117.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
Second quarter
|
$
|
109.48
|
|
|
$
|
79.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
137.62
|
|
|
$
|
118.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
Third quarter
|
$
|
95.50
|
|
|
$
|
73.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
150.94
|
|
|
$
|
117.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
$
|
98.72
|
|
|
$
|
79.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
149.73
|
|
|
$
|
113.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
On February 16, 2016, the Company filed a voluntary application with the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority to delist its common shares from the London Stock Exchange (“LSE”). Signet took this action as a result of less than 1% of the Company’s annual trading volume being executed on the LSE. As a result, the benefit of LSE listing was outweighed by the monetary expense, regulatory burdens and time spent on LSE-driven activity. Common shares of the Company continued to trade on the LSE until close of business on March 15, 2016.
On
March 9, 2017
, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) declared a 19% increase in the first quarter dividend, resulting in an increase from $0.26 to $0.31 per Signet common share. Future payments of quarterly dividends will be based on Signet’s ability to satisfy all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements and its continued financial strength. Any future payment of cash dividends will depend upon such factors as Signet’s earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, restrictions under Signet’s credit facility, legal restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by the Board.
Number of common shareholders
As of
March 10, 2017
, there were approximately
7,370
shareholders of record.
Repurchases of equity securities
The following table contains the Company’s repurchases of common shares in the fourth quarter of
Fiscal 2017
:
|
Period
|
Total number of shares purchased
|
|
Average price paid per share
|
|
Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs
(1)
|
|
Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
|
||||
|
October 30, 2016 to November 26, 2016
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$668,086,614
|
|
November 27, 2016 to December 24, 2016
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$668,086,614
|
|
December 25, 2016 to January 28, 2017
|
1,311,540
|
|
|
$
|
87.01
|
|
(1)
|
1,311,540
|
|
|
$510,586,584
|
|
Total
|
1,311,540
|
|
|
$
|
87.01
|
|
(1)
|
1,311,540
|
|
|
$510,586,584
|
|
(1)
|
In February 2016 and August 2016, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of Signet’s common shares up to $750.0 million and $625.0 million, respectively, for a combined total of $1,375.0 million (the “2016 Program”). The Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”) agreement on October 5, 2016 to repurchase $525.0 million of the Company’s common shares and took delivery of
4.7 million
shares. In December 2016, the Company finalized the transaction and received an additional
1.3 million
shares. Total shares repurchased under the ASR were
6.0 million
shares at an average purchase price of
$87.01
per share based on the volume-weighted average price of the Company’s common shares traded during the pricing period, less an agreed discount. See Note 6 of Item 8 for additional information.
|
36
Performance graph
The following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be filed with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that Signet specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.
Historical share price performance should not be relied upon as an indication of future share price performance. The following graph compares the cumulative total return to holders of Signet’s common shares against the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Specialty Retail Index for the five year period ended
January 28, 2017
. The comparison of the cumulative total returns for each investment assumes that $100 was invested in Signet’s common shares and the respective indices on January 28, 2012 through
January 28, 2017
.
Related Shareholder Matters
The Parent Company is classified by the Bermuda Monetary Authority as a non-resident of Bermuda for exchange control purposes. Issues and transfers of common shares involving persons regarded as non-residents of Bermuda for exchange control purposes may be effected without specific consent under the Exchange Control Act 1972 of Bermuda and regulations thereunder. Issues and transfers of common shares involving persons regarded as residents in Bermuda for exchange control purposes may require specific prior approval under the Exchange Control Act 1972 of Bermuda and regulations thereunder.
The owners of common shares who are non-residents of Bermuda are not subject to any restrictions on their rights to hold or vote their shares. Because the Parent Company is classified as a non-resident of Bermuda for exchange control purposes, there are no restrictions on its ability to transfer funds into and out of Bermuda or to pay dividends, other than in respect of local Bermuda currency.
There is no reciprocal tax treaty between Bermuda and the United States regarding withholding taxes. Under existing Bermuda law, there is no Bermuda income or withholding tax on dividends paid by the Parent Company to its shareholders. Furthermore, under existing Bermuda law, no Bermuda tax is levied on the sale or transfer of Signet common shares.
37
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The financial data included below for
Fiscal 2017
,
Fiscal 2016
and
Fiscal 2015
has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. The financial data for these periods should be read in conjunction with the financial statements, including the notes thereto, and Item 7. The financial data included below for
Fiscal 2014
and
Fiscal 2013
has been derived from the previously published consolidated audited financial statements not included in this document.
|
FINANCIAL DATA:
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
(1)
|
|
Fiscal 2014
|
|
Fiscal 2013
(2)
|
|
||||||||||
|
Income statement:
|
(in millions)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales
|
$
|
6,408.4
|
|
|
$
|
6,550.2
|
|
|
$
|
5,736.3
|
|
|
$
|
4,209.2
|
|
|
$
|
3,983.4
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
$
|
2,360.8
|
|
|
$
|
2,440.4
|
|
|
$
|
2,074.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,580.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,537.4
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
$
|
(1,880.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,987.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,712.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,196.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,138.3
|
)
|
|
|
Operating income
|
$
|
763.2
|
|
|
$
|
703.7
|
|
|
$
|
576.6
|
|
|
$
|
570.5
|
|
|
$
|
560.5
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
531.3
|
|
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
|
$
|
368.0
|
|
|
$
|
359.9
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
(3)
|
$
|
955.0
|
|
|
$
|
891.5
|
|
|
$
|
762.9
|
|
|
$
|
680.7
|
|
|
$
|
659.9
|
|
|
|
Same store sales percentage (decrease) increase
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
(Income statement as a % of sales)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|||||
|
Gross margin
|
36.8
|
%
|
|
37.3
|
%
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
|
37.5
|
%
|
|
38.6
|
%
|
|
|||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(29.3
|
)%
|
|
(30.4
|
)%
|
|
(29.9
|
)%
|
|
(28.4
|
)%
|
|
(28.6
|
)%
|
|
|||||
|
Operating income
|
11.9
|
%
|
(4)
|
10.7
|
%
|
(4)
|
10.0
|
%
|
(4)
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|||||
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA
(3)
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
7.13
|
|
|
$
|
5.89
|
|
|
$
|
4.77
|
|
|
$
|
4.59
|
|
|
$
|
4.37
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
7.08
|
|
|
$
|
5.87
|
|
|
$
|
4.75
|
|
|
$
|
4.56
|
|
|
$
|
4.35
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
(in millions)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
74.5
|
|
|
79.5
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
82.3
|
|
|
|||||
|
Diluted
|
76.7
|
|
|
79.7
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
80.7
|
|
|
82.8
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Balance sheet:
|
(in millions)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
(5)
|
$
|
6,597.8
|
|
|
$
|
6,464.9
|
|
|
$
|
6,203.0
|
|
|
$
|
3,916.1
|
|
|
$
|
3,616.5
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
(5)
|
$
|
3,495.7
|
|
|
$
|
3,404.2
|
|
|
$
|
3,392.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,353.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,286.6
|
|
|
|
Series A redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
$
|
611.9
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
n/a
|
|
n/a
|
|
n/a
|
|
||||||||
|
Net (debt) cash
(3)
|
$
|
(1,310.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,241.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,256.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
228.3
|
|
|
$
|
301.0
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
$
|
3,438.9
|
|
|
$
|
3,437.0
|
|
|
$
|
3,210.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,467.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,292.2
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
|
68.3
|
|
|
79.4
|
|
|
80.3
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
81.4
|
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
On May 29, 2014, the Company completed the acquisition of Zale Corporation. Fiscal 2015 results include Zale Corporation’s results since the date of acquisition. See Note 3 of Item 8 for additional information.
|
|
(2)
|
Fiscal 2013 was a 53 week period. The 53
rd
week added $56.4 million in net sales and decreased diluted earnings per share by approximately $0.02 for the fiscal period.
|
(3)
Adjusted EBITDA and net (debt) cash are non-GAAP measures; see “GAAP and non-GAAP Measures” below.
|
(4)
|
The acquisition of Zale in May 2014, with operating margins lower than that of Signet, caused an overall lower operating margin for Signet.
|
|
(5)
|
Results reclassified in accordance with Signet’s adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2015-03, which requires debt issuance costs to be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability. See Note 2 of Item 8 for additional information.
|
|
n/a
|
Not applicable as Series A redeemable convertible preferred shares were issued in October 2016.
|
38
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
(1)
|
|
Fiscal 2014
|
|
Fiscal 2013
|
|
||||||||||
|
Other financial data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Free cash flow (in millions)
(2)
|
$
|
400.3
|
|
|
$
|
216.8
|
|
|
$
|
62.8
|
|
|
$
|
82.8
|
|
|
$
|
178.5
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
35.4
|
%
|
|
|||||
|
ROCE
(2)
|
21.4
|
%
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
|
|||||
|
Adjusted leverage ratio
(2)
|
3.6x
|
|
|
3.3x
|
|
|
3.5x
|
|
|
1.8x
|
|
|
1.8x
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Store and employee data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Store locations (at end of period)
|
3,682
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
3,579
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
1,954
|
|
|
|||||
|
Number of employees (full-time equivalents)
|
29,566
|
|
(3)
|
29,057
|
|
(3)
|
28,949
|
|
(3)
|
18,179
|
|
(3)
|
17,877
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
(1)
|
On May 29, 2014, the Company completed the acquisition of Zale Corporation. Fiscal 2015 includes Zale Corporation’s results since the date of acquisition. See Note 3 of Item 8 for additional information.
|
(2)
Free cash flow, ROCE and adjusted leverage ratio are non-GAAP measures; see “GAAP and non-GAAP Measures” below.
|
(3)
|
Number of employees includes
163
, 194, 226 and 211 full-time equivalents employed in the diamond polishing plant located in Botswana for Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015, and Fiscal 2014, respectively.
|
GAAP AND NON-GAAP MEASURES
The discussion and analysis of Signet’s results of operations, financial condition and liquidity contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based upon the consolidated financial statements of Signet which are prepared in accordance with US GAAP and should be read in conjunction with Signet’s financial statements and the related notes included in Item 8. A number of non-GAAP measures are used by management to analyze and manage the performance of the business, and the required disclosures for these non-GAAP measures are shown below. In particular, the terms “at constant exchange rates,” “underlying” and “underlying at constant exchange rates” are used in a number of places. “At constant exchange rates” is used to indicate where items have been adjusted to eliminate the impact of exchange rate movements on translation of British pound and Canadian dollar amounts to US dollars. “Underlying” is used to indicate where adjustments for significant, unusual and non-recurring items have been made and “underlying at constant exchange rates” indicates where the underlying items have been further adjusted to eliminate the impact of exchange rate movements on translation of British pound and Canadian dollar amounts to US dollars.
Signet provides such non-GAAP information in reporting its financial results to give investors additional data to evaluate its operations. Management does not, nor does it suggest investors should, consider such non-GAAP measures in isolation from, or in substitution for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP.
1. Income Statements at Constant Exchange Rates
Movements in the British pound and Canadian dollar to US dollar exchange rates have an impact on Signet’s results. The UK Jewelry division is managed in British pounds and the Canadian reporting unit of the Zale Jewelry segment in Canadian dollars as sales and a majority of operating expenses are incurred in those foreign currencies. The results for each are then translated into US dollars for external reporting purposes. Management believes it assists in understanding the performance of Signet and its segments if constant currency figures are given. This is particularly so in periods when exchange rates are volatile. The constant currency amounts are calculated by retranslating the prior year figures using the current year’s exchange rate. Management considers it useful to exclude the impact of movements in the British pound and Canadian dollar to US dollar exchange rates to analyze and explain changes and trends in Signet’s underlying business, which is consistent with the manner in which management evaluates performance of its businesses which do not operate using the US dollar as their functional currency. Additionally, in connection with management’s evaluation of its attainment of performance goals, currency effects are excluded.
39
(a)
Fiscal 2017
percentage change in results at constant exchange rates
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Change %
|
|
Impact of exchange rate movement
|
|
Fiscal 2016
at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP)
|
|
Change % from Fiscal 2016
at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP)
|
||||||||||
|
Sales by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
$
|
3,930.4
|
|
|
$
|
3,988.7
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,988.7
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
Zale Jewelry
|
1,549.7
|
|
|
1,568.2
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
1,565.2
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
||||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
263.1
|
|
|
243.2
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
243.2
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
||||
|
UK Jewelry
|
647.1
|
|
|
737.6
|
|
|
(12.3
|
)%
|
|
(96.4
|
)
|
|
641.2
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
||||
|
Other
|
18.1
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
44.8
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
44.8
|
%
|
||||
|
Total sales
|
6,408.4
|
|
|
6,550.2
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
|
(99.4
|
)
|
|
6,450.8
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
||||
|
Cost of sales
|
(4,047.6
|
)
|
|
(4,109.8
|
)
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
67.2
|
|
|
(4,042.6
|
)
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
||||
|
Gross margin
|
2,360.8
|
|
|
2,440.4
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
|
(32.2
|
)
|
|
2,408.2
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(1,880.2
|
)
|
|
(1,987.6
|
)
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
(1,964.5
|
)
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
||||
|
Other operating income, net
|
282.6
|
|
|
250.9
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
250.9
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
||||
|
Operating income (loss) by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
715.8
|
|
|
718.6
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
—
|
|
|
718.6
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
||||
|
Zale Jewelry
(1)
|
62.2
|
|
|
44.3
|
|
|
40.4
|
%
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
39.1
|
%
|
||||
|
Piercing Pagoda
(2)
|
11.2
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
43.6
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
43.6
|
%
|
||||
|
UK Jewelry
|
45.6
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
(25.9
|
)%
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)%
|
||||
|
Other
(3)
|
(71.6
|
)
|
|
(128.5
|
)
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
(127.8
|
)
|
|
44.0
|
%
|
||||
|
Total operating income
|
763.2
|
|
|
703.7
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
694.6
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(49.4
|
)
|
|
(45.9
|
)
|
|
(7.6
|
)%
|
|
—
|
|
|
(45.9
|
)
|
|
(7.6
|
)%
|
||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
713.8
|
|
|
657.8
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
648.7
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
||||
|
Income taxes
|
(170.6
|
)
|
|
(189.9
|
)
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
(188.1
|
)
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
||||
|
Net income
|
543.2
|
|
|
467.9
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
460.6
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
||||
|
Dividends on redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
nm
|
|
||||
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
531.3
|
|
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
460.6
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
$
|
7.13
|
|
|
$
|
5.89
|
|
|
21.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.79
|
|
|
23.1
|
%
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
$
|
7.08
|
|
|
$
|
5.87
|
|
|
20.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.78
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Zale Jewelry includes net operating loss impact of
$16.4 million
and
$23.1 million
for purchase accounting adjustments in
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively.
|
(2)
Piercing Pagoda includes net operating loss impact of
$0.4 million
and
$3.3 million
for purchase accounting adjustments in
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively.
|
(3)
|
Other includes
$28.4 million
in
Fiscal 2017
of integration costs for consulting expenses associated with information technology (“IT”) implementations, severance related to organizational changes and and expenses associated with the settlement of miscellaneous legal matters pending as of the date of the Zale acquisition. Other includes
$78.9 million
in
Fiscal 2016
of transaction and integration costs primarily attributable to the legal settlement of $34.2 million over appraisal rights, expenses associated with legal, tax, accounting, IT implementations and consulting services, as well as severance costs.
|
|
nm
|
Not meaningful.
|
40
(b)
Fourth
quarter
Fiscal 2017
percentage change in results at constant exchange rates
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
13 weeks
ended January 28, 2017 |
|
13 weeks
ended January 30, 2016 |
|
Change %
|
|
Impact of
exchange rate movement |
|
13 weeks ended
January 30, 2016 at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP) |
|
Change % from 13 weeks ended
January 30, 2016 at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP) |
||||||||||
|
Sales by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
$
|
1,398.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,452.5
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,452.5
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
Zale Jewelry
|
554.9
|
|
|
577.0
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
579.1
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
||||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
83.7
|
|
|
78.1
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
78.1
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
||||
|
UK Jewelry
|
227.6
|
|
|
282.6
|
|
|
(19.5
|
)%
|
|
(47.2
|
)
|
|
235.4
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
||||
|
Other
|
5.6
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
133.3
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
133.3
|
%
|
||||
|
Total sales
|
2,269.9
|
|
|
2,392.6
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
|
(45.1
|
)
|
|
2,347.5
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
||||
|
Cost of sales
|
(1,324.4
|
)
|
|
(1,376.6
|
)
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
(1,349.4
|
)
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
||||
|
Gross margin
|
945.5
|
|
|
1,016.0
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)%
|
|
(17.9
|
)
|
|
998.1
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)%
|
||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(615.3
|
)
|
|
(686.6
|
)
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
(677.7
|
)
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
||||
|
Other operating income, net
|
69.0
|
|
|
63.7
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
63.7
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
||||
|
Operating income (loss) by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
298.0
|
|
|
305.4
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
—
|
|
|
305.4
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
||||
|
Zale Jewelry
(1)
|
62.7
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
54.5
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
||||
|
Piercing Pagoda
(2)
|
9.0
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
||||
|
UK Jewelry
|
42.6
|
|
|
57.8
|
|
|
(26.3
|
)%
|
|
(9.6
|
)
|
|
48.2
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)%
|
||||
|
Other
(3)
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
(33.1
|
)
|
|
60.4
|
%
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
(32.8
|
)
|
|
60.1
|
%
|
||||
|
Total operating income
|
399.2
|
|
|
393.1
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
384.1
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
(7.4
|
)%
|
|
—
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
(7.4
|
)%
|
||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
386.2
|
|
|
381.0
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
372.0
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
||||
|
Income taxes
|
(88.7
|
)
|
|
(109.1
|
)
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
(107.3
|
)
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
||||
|
Net income
|
297.5
|
|
|
271.9
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
264.7
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
||||
|
Dividends on redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
nm
|
|
||||
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
287.8
|
|
|
$
|
271.9
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
264.7
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
$
|
4.17
|
|
|
$
|
3.43
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.34
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
|
$
|
3.42
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.33
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Zale Jewelry includes net operating loss impact of
$3.2 million
and
$6.0 million
for purchase accounting adjustments in
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively.
|
(2)
Piercing Pagoda includes net operating loss impact of
$0.1 million
and
$0.2 million
for purchase accounting adjustments in
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively.
|
(3)
|
Other includes
$9.9 million
for the 13 weeks ended January 28, 2017 of integration costs for consulting expenses associated with IT implementations, severance related to organizational changes and expenses associated with the settlement of miscellaneous legal matters pending as of the date of the Zale acquisition. Other includes
$19.1 million
for the 13 weeks ended January 30, 2016 of transaction and integration costs primarily attributed to expenses associated with legal, tax, accounting, IT implementations and consulting services, as well as severance costs.
|
|
nm
|
Not meaningful.
|
41
(c)
Fiscal 2016
percentage change in results at constant exchange rates
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Change %
|
|
Impact of
exchange rate movement |
|
Fiscal 2015
at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP) |
|
Change % from Fiscal 2015
at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP) |
||||||||||
|
Sales by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
$
|
3,988.7
|
|
|
$
|
3,765.0
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,765.0
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
Zale Jewelry
|
1,568.2
|
|
|
1,068.7
|
|
|
46.7
|
%
|
|
(31.7
|
)
|
|
1,037.0
|
|
|
51.2
|
%
|
||||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
243.2
|
|
|
146.9
|
|
|
65.6
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
146.9
|
|
|
65.6
|
%
|
||||
|
UK Jewelry
|
737.6
|
|
|
743.6
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
(47.3
|
)
|
|
696.3
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
||||
|
Other
|
12.5
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
||||
|
Total sales
|
6,550.2
|
|
|
5,736.3
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
(79.0
|
)
|
|
5,657.3
|
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
||||
|
Cost of sales
|
(4,109.8
|
)
|
|
(3,662.1
|
)
|
|
(12.2
|
)%
|
|
56.2
|
|
|
(3,605.9
|
)
|
|
(14.0
|
)%
|
||||
|
Gross margin
|
2,440.4
|
|
|
2,074.2
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
(22.8
|
)
|
|
2,051.4
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(1,987.6
|
)
|
|
(1,712.9
|
)
|
|
(16.0
|
)%
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
(1,691.7
|
)
|
|
(17.5
|
)%
|
||||
|
Other operating income, net
|
250.9
|
|
|
215.3
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
215.5
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
||||
|
Operating income (loss) by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
718.6
|
|
|
624.3
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
624.3
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
||||
|
Zale Jewelry
(1)
|
44.3
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
||||
|
Piercing Pagoda
(2)
|
7.8
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
||||
|
UK Jewelry
|
61.5
|
|
|
52.2
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
||||
|
Other
(3)
|
(128.5
|
)
|
|
(91.7
|
)
|
|
(40.1
|
)%
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
(91.4
|
)
|
|
(40.6
|
)%
|
||||
|
Total operating income
|
703.7
|
|
|
576.6
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
575.2
|
|
|
22.3
|
%
|
||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(45.9
|
)
|
|
(36.0
|
)
|
|
(27.5
|
)%
|
|
—
|
|
|
(36.0
|
)
|
|
(27.5
|
)%
|
||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
657.8
|
|
|
540.6
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
539.2
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
||||
|
Income taxes
|
(189.9
|
)
|
|
(159.3
|
)
|
|
(19.2
|
)%
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
(159.2
|
)
|
|
(19.3
|
)%
|
||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
380.0
|
|
|
23.1
|
%
|
||
|
Basic earnings per share
|
$
|
5.89
|
|
|
$
|
4.77
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.76
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
$
|
5.87
|
|
|
$
|
4.75
|
|
|
23.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.74
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Zale Jewelry includes net operating loss impact of $23.1 million and $35.1 million for purchase accounting adjustments in Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively.
|
(2)
Piercing Pagoda includes net operating loss impact of $3.3 million and $10.8 million for purchase accounting adjustments in Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively.
|
(3)
|
Other includes $78.9 million and $59.8 million of transaction and integration expenses in Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively. Transaction and integration costs include expenses associated with advisor fees for legal, tax, accounting, IT implementations and consulting, severance and the legal settlement of $34.2 million over appraisal rights in Fiscal 2016.
|
|
nm
|
Not meaningful.
|
42
(d)
Fourth
quarter
Fiscal 2016
percentage change in results at constant exchange rates
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
13 weeks ended
January 30, 2016 |
|
13 weeks ended
January 31, 2015 |
|
Change %
|
|
Impact of
exchange rate movement |
|
13 weeks ended
January 31, 2015 at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP) |
|
Change % from 13 weeks ended
January 31, 2015 at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP) |
||||||||||
|
Sales by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
$
|
1,452.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,358.3
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,358.3
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
Zale Jewelry
|
577.0
|
|
|
564.6
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
(16.3
|
)
|
|
548.3
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
||||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
78.1
|
|
|
72.1
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
72.1
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
||||
|
UK Jewelry
|
282.6
|
|
|
278.0
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
266.9
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
||||
|
Other
|
2.4
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
(29.4
|
)%
|
|
—
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
(29.4
|
)%
|
||||
|
Total sales
|
2,392.6
|
|
|
2,276.4
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
(27.4
|
)
|
|
2,249.0
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
||||
|
Cost of sales
|
(1,376.6
|
)
|
|
(1,364.3
|
)
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
(1,346.3
|
)
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
||||
|
Gross margin
|
1,016.0
|
|
|
912.1
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
902.7
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(686.6
|
)
|
|
(634.5
|
)
|
|
(8.2
|
)%
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
(626.8
|
)
|
|
(9.5
|
)%
|
||||
|
Other operating income, net
|
63.7
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
54.3
|
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
||||
|
Operating income (loss) by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
305.4
|
|
|
260.0
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
260.0
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
||||
|
Zale Jewelry
(1)
|
54.2
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
65.2
|
%
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
63.3
|
%
|
||||
|
Piercing Pagoda
(2)
|
8.8
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
166.7
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
166.7
|
%
|
||||
|
UK Jewelry
|
57.8
|
|
|
53.8
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
||||
|
Other
(3)
|
(33.1
|
)
|
|
(18.2
|
)
|
|
(81.9
|
)%
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
(18.1
|
)
|
|
(82.9
|
)%
|
||||
|
Total operating income
|
393.1
|
|
|
331.7
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
330.2
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
(53.2
|
)%
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
(51.3
|
)%
|
||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
381.0
|
|
|
323.8
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
322.2
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
||||
|
Income taxes
|
(109.1
|
)
|
|
(95.8
|
)
|
|
(13.9
|
)%
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
(95.6
|
)
|
|
(14.1
|
)%
|
||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
271.9
|
|
|
$
|
228.0
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
226.6
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
$
|
3.43
|
|
|
$
|
2.85
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.84
|
|
|
20.8
|
%
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
$
|
3.42
|
|
|
$
|
2.84
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.83
|
|
|
20.8
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Zale Jewelry includes net operating loss impact of $6.0 million and $14.7 million for purchase accounting adjustments in Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively.
|
(2)
Piercing Pagoda includes net operating loss impact of $0.2 million and $6.1 million for purchase accounting adjustments in Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively.
|
(3)
|
Other includes $19.1 million and $9.2 million of transaction and integration expenses in Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively, which are primarily attributable to advisor fees for legal, tax, accounting, IT implementations and consulting services, as well as severance costs.
|
2. Operating data reflecting the impact of material acquisitions and acquisition-related costs
The below table reflects the impact of costs associated with the acquisition of Zale Corporation (the “Acquisition”), along with certain other accounting adjustments made. Management finds the information useful to analyze the results of the business excluding these items in order to appropriately evaluate the performance of the business without the impact of significant and unusual items. Management views acquisition-related impacts as events that are not necessarily reflective of operational performance during a period. In particular, management believes the consideration of measures that exclude such expenses can assist in the comparison of operational performance in different periods which may or may not include such expenses.
43
(a)
Fiscal 2017
operating data reflecting the impact of integration costs and accounting adjustments
|
(in millions, except per share amount and % of sales)
|
Signet consolidated,
as reported |
|
Accounting adjustments
(1)
|
|
Integration costs
(2)
|
|
Adjusted Signet
|
||||||||||||||
|
Sales
|
$
|
6,408.4
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,421.7
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
Cost of sales
|
(4,047.6
|
)
|
|
(63.2
|
)%
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,049.6
|
)
|
|
(63.1
|
)%
|
||||
|
Gross margin
|
2,360.8
|
|
|
36.8
|
%
|
|
(11.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,372.1
|
|
|
36.9
|
%
|
||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(1,880.2
|
)
|
|
(29.3
|
)%
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
(28.4
|
)
|
|
(1,846.3
|
)
|
|
(28.7
|
)%
|
||||
|
Other operating income, net
|
282.6
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
282.6
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
||||
|
Operating income
|
763.2
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
(16.8
|
)
|
|
(28.4
|
)
|
|
808.4
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(49.4
|
)
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(49.4
|
)
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
713.8
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
|
(16.8
|
)
|
|
(28.4
|
)
|
|
759.0
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
||||
|
Income taxes
|
(170.6
|
)
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
(187.6
|
)
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
543.2
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
(10.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
571.4
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
Dividends on redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
||||
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
531.3
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
(10.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
559.5
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
Earnings per share - diluted
|
$
|
7.08
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.45
|
|
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
Includes the impact of all acquisition adjustments recognized in conjunction with the Acquisition in Fiscal 2015.
|
|
(2)
|
Integration costs are consulting expenses associated with IT implementations, severance related to organizational changes and expenses associated with the settlement of miscellaneous legal matters pending as of the date of the Zale acquisition. These costs are included within Signet’s Other segment.
|
(b)
Fourth
quarter
Fiscal 2017
operating data reflecting the impact of integration costs and accounting adjustments
|
(in millions, except per share amount and % of sales)
|
Signet consolidated,
as reported |
|
Accounting adjustments
(1)
|
|
Integration costs
(2)
|
|
Adjusted Signet
|
||||||||||||||
|
Sales
|
$
|
2,269.9
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,272.5
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
Cost of sales
|
(1,324.4
|
)
|
|
(58.3
|
)%
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,325.3
|
)
|
|
(58.3
|
)%
|
||||
|
Gross margin
|
945.5
|
|
|
41.7
|
%
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
947.2
|
|
|
41.7
|
%
|
||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(615.3
|
)
|
|
(27.1
|
)%
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
(603.8
|
)
|
|
(26.6
|
)%
|
||||
|
Other operating income, net
|
69.0
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
69.0
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
||||
|
Operating income
|
399.2
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
412.4
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
386.2
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
399.4
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
||||
|
Income taxes
|
(88.7
|
)
|
|
(3.9
|
)%
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
(93.6
|
)
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
297.5
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
305.8
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
Dividends on redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
||||
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
287.8
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
296.1
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
Earnings per share - diluted
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.03
|
|
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
Includes the impact of all acquisition adjustments recognized in conjunction with the Acquisition in Fiscal 2015.
|
|
(2)
|
Integration costs include consulting expenses associated with IT implementations, severance related to organizational changes and expenses associated with the settlement of miscellaneous legal matters pending as of the date of the Zale acquisition. These costs are included within Signet’s Other segment.
|
44
(c)
Fiscal 2016
operating data reflecting the impact of acquisition-related costs and accounting adjustments
|
(in millions, except per share amount and % of sales) |
Signet consolidated,
as reported |
|
Accounting adjustments
(1)
|
|
Transaction/Integration costs
(2)
|
|
Adjusted Signet
|
||||||||||||||
|
Sales
|
$
|
6,550.2
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(27.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,577.4
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
Cost of sales
|
(4,109.8
|
)
|
|
(62.7
|
)%
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,101.4
|
)
|
|
(62.4
|
)%
|
||||
|
Gross margin
|
2,440.4
|
|
|
37.3
|
%
|
|
(35.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,476.0
|
|
|
37.6
|
%
|
||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(1,987.6
|
)
|
|
(30.4
|
)%
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
(78.9
|
)
|
|
(1,917.9
|
)
|
|
(29.1
|
)%
|
||||
|
Other operating income, net
|
250.9
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
250.9
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
||||
|
Operating income
|
703.7
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
(26.4
|
)
|
|
(78.9
|
)
|
|
809.0
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(45.9
|
)
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(45.9
|
)
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
657.8
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
(26.4
|
)
|
|
(78.9
|
)
|
|
763.1
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
||||
|
Income taxes
|
(189.9
|
)
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
(216.0
|
)
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
(17.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
547.1
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
Dividends on redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
(17.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
547.1
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
Earnings per share - diluted
|
$
|
5.87
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.86
|
|
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
Includes the impact of all acquisition adjustments recognized in conjunction with the Acquisition in Fiscal 2015.
|
|
(2)
|
Transaction and integration costs are primarily attributable to the legal settlement of $34.2 million over appraisal rights, expenses associated with legal, tax, accounting, IT implementations and consulting services, as well as severance costs. These costs are included within Signet’s Other segment.
|
(d)
Fourth
quarter
Fiscal 2016
operating data reflecting the impact of acquisition-related costs and accounting adjustments
|
(in millions, except per share amount and % of sales) |
Signet consolidated,
as reported |
|
Accounting adjustments
(1)
|
|
Transaction/Integration costs
(2)
|
|
Adjusted Signet
|
||||||||||||||
|
Sales
|
$
|
2,392.6
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,397.8
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
Cost of sales
|
(1,376.6
|
)
|
|
(57.5
|
)%
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,377.1
|
)
|
|
(57.4
|
)%
|
||||
|
Gross margin
|
1,016.0
|
|
|
42.5
|
%
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,020.7
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(686.6
|
)
|
|
(28.7
|
)%
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|
(666.0
|
)
|
|
(27.8
|
)%
|
||||
|
Other operating income, net
|
63.7
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
63.7
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
||||
|
Operating income
|
393.1
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|
418.4
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
381.0
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|
406.3
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
||||
|
Income taxes
|
(109.1
|
)
|
|
(4.5
|
)%
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
(117.8
|
)
|
|
(4.9
|
)%
|
||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
271.9
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
288.5
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
Dividends on redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
271.9
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
288.5
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
Earnings per share - diluted
|
$
|
3.42
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.63
|
|
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
Includes the impact of all acquisition adjustments recognized in conjunction with the Acquisition in Fiscal 2015.
|
|
(2)
|
Transaction and integration costs are primarily attributed to expenses associated with legal, tax, accounting, IT implementations and consulting services, as well as severance costs. These costs are included within Signet’s Other segment.
|
45
3. Net Debt
Net debt is a non-GAAP measure defined as the total of cash and cash equivalents less loans, overdrafts and long-term debt. Management considers this metric to be helpful in understanding the total indebtedness of the Company after consideration of liquidity available from cash balances on-hand.
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
|
January 31, 2015
|
||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
98.7
|
|
|
$
|
137.7
|
|
|
$
|
193.6
|
|
|
Loans and overdrafts
|
(91.1
|
)
|
|
(57.7
|
)
|
|
(95.7
|
)
|
|||
|
Long-term debt
|
(1,317.9
|
)
|
|
(1,321.0
|
)
|
|
(1,354.3
|
)
|
|||
|
Net debt
|
$
|
(1,310.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,241.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,256.4
|
)
|
4. Return on Capital Employed Excluding Goodwill (“ROCE”)
ROCE is a non-GAAP measure calculated by dividing the 52 week annual operating income by the average quarterly capital employed and is expressed as a percentage. Capital employed includes accounts and other receivables, inventories, property, plant and equipment, other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, other liabilities, deferred revenue and retirement benefit asset/obligation. This is a key performance indicator used by management for assessing the effective operation of the business and is considered a useful disclosure for investors as it provides a measure of the return on Signet’s operating assets. Further, this metric is utilized in evaluating management performance and incorporated into management’s long-term incentive plan metrics.
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Fiscal 2014
|
|
Fiscal 2013
|
|||||
|
ROCE
|
21.4
|
%
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
5. Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure defined as the net cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property, plant and equipment. Management considers that this is helpful in understanding how the business is generating cash from its operating and investing activities that can be used to meet the financing needs of the business. Free cash flow is an indicator used by management frequently in evaluating its overall liquidity and determining appropriate capital allocation strategies. Free cash flow does not represent the residual cash flow available for discretionary expenditure.
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
678.3
|
|
|
$
|
443.3
|
|
|
$
|
283.0
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
(278.0
|
)
|
|
(226.5
|
)
|
|
(220.2
|
)
|
|||
|
Free cash flow
|
$
|
400.3
|
|
|
$
|
216.8
|
|
|
$
|
62.8
|
|
46
6. Leverage Ratio
The leverage ratio is a non-GAAP measure calculated by dividing Signet’s adjusted debt by adjusted EBITDAR. Adjusted debt is a non-GAAP measure defined as debt recorded in the consolidated balance sheet, plus Series A redeemable convertible preferred shares, plus an adjustment for operating leases (8x annual rent expense), less 70% of outstanding in-house finance receivables recorded in the consolidated balance sheet. Adjusted EBITDAR is a non-GAAP measure. Adjusted EBITDAR is defined as earnings before interest and income taxes (operating income), depreciation and amortization, and non-cash acquisition-related accounting adjustments (“Adjusted EBITDA”) and further excludes rent expense for properties occupied under operating leases, non-cash share-based compensation expense and the income statement impact of the finance receivables related to the in-house credit program. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR are considered important indicators of operating performance as they exclude the effects of financing and investing activities by eliminating the effects of interest, depreciation and amortization costs and accounting adjustments. Management believes these financial measures are helpful to enhancing investors’ ability to analyze trends in Signet’s business and evaluate Signet’s performance relative to other companies. Management also utilizes these metrics to evaluate its current credit profile, which is similar to rating agency methodologies.
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Fiscal 2014
|
|
Fiscal 2013
|
||||||||||
|
Adjusted debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
$
|
1,317.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,321.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,354.3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Loans and overdrafts
|
91.1
|
|
|
57.7
|
|
|
95.7
|
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Series A redeemable convertible preferred shares
(1)(4)
|
611.9
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|||||
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
8x rent expense
|
4,195.2
|
|
|
4,205.6
|
|
|
3,703.2
|
|
|
2,589.6
|
|
|
2,528.0
|
|
|||||
|
70% of in-house credit program financing receivables
|
(1,269.3
|
)
|
|
(1,208.2
|
)
|
|
(1,087.0
|
)
|
|
(949.2
|
)
|
|
(835.0
|
)
|
|||||
|
Adjusted debt
|
$
|
4,946.8
|
|
|
$
|
4,376.1
|
|
|
$
|
4,066.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,659.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,693.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDAR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Operating income
|
$
|
763.2
|
|
|
$
|
703.7
|
|
|
$
|
576.6
|
|
|
$
|
570.5
|
|
|
$
|
560.5
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization on property, plant and equipment
(2)
|
175.0
|
|
|
161.4
|
|
|
140.4
|
|
|
110.2
|
|
|
99.4
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of definite-lived intangibles
(2)(3)
|
13.8
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of unfavorable leases and contracts
(3)
|
(19.7
|
)
|
|
(28.7
|
)
|
|
(23.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Other non-cash accounting adjustments
(3)
|
22.7
|
|
|
41.2
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
955.0
|
|
|
$
|
891.5
|
|
|
$
|
762.9
|
|
|
$
|
680.7
|
|
|
$
|
659.9
|
|
|
Rent expense
|
524.4
|
|
|
525.7
|
|
|
462.9
|
|
|
323.7
|
|
|
316.0
|
|
|||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
8.0
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|||||
|
Finance income from in-house credit program
|
(277.6
|
)
|
|
(252.5
|
)
|
|
(217.9
|
)
|
|
(186.4
|
)
|
|
(159.7
|
)
|
|||||
|
Late charge income
(4)
|
(36.0
|
)
|
|
(33.9
|
)
|
|
(31.3
|
)
|
|
(29.4
|
)
|
|
(27.5
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net bad debt expense
(4)
|
212.1
|
|
|
190.5
|
|
|
160.0
|
|
|
138.3
|
|
|
122.4
|
|
|||||
|
Adjusted EBITDAR
|
$
|
1,385.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,337.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,148.7
|
|
|
$
|
941.3
|
|
|
$
|
926.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Adjusted Leverage ratio
|
3.6x
|
|
|
3.3x
|
|
|
3.5x
|
|
|
1.8x
|
|
|
1.8x
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Series A redeemable convertible preferred shares were issued in October 2016.
|
|
(2)
|
Total amount of depreciation and amortization reflected on the consolidated statement of cash flows for
Fiscal 2017
,
Fiscal 2016
and
Fiscal 2015
equals
$188.8 million
,
$175.3 million
and
$149.7 million
, respectively, which includes
$13.8 million
,
$13.9 million
and
$9.3 million
, respectively, related to the amortization of definite-lived intangibles, primarily favorable leases and trade names.
|
|
(3)
|
Total net operating loss relating to Acquisition accounting adjustments is
$16.8 million
,
$26.4 million
and $45.9 million for
Fiscal 2017
,
Fiscal 2016
and
Fiscal 2015
, respectively, as reflected in the non-GAAP tables above.
|
|
(4)
|
Adjusted debt and adjusted EBITDA have been recalculated to align with methodologies commonly utilized by credit rating agencies and others in evaluating leverage.
|
|
n/a
|
Not applicable.
|
47
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements which are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, based upon management’s beliefs and expectations as well as on assumptions made by and data currently available to management, appear in a number of places throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K and include statements regarding, among other things, Signet’s results of operation, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth, strategies and the industry in which Signet operates. The use of the words “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “believes,” “should,” “potential,” “may,” “forecast,” “objective,” “plan,” or “target,” and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to general economic conditions, regulatory changes following the United Kingdom’s announcement to exit from the European Union, a decline in consumer spending, the merchandising, pricing and inventory policies followed by Signet, the reputation of Signet and its brands, the level of competition in the jewelry sector, the cost and availability of diamonds, gold and other precious metals, regulations relating to customer credit, seasonality of Signet’s business, financial market risks, deterioration in customers’ financial condition, exchange rate fluctuations, changes in Signet’s credit rating, changes in consumer attitudes regarding jewelry, management of social, ethical and environmental risks, the development and maintenance of Signet’s omni-channel retailing, security breaches and other disruptions to Signet’s information technology infrastructure and databases, inadequacy in and disruptions to internal controls and systems, changes in assumptions used in making accounting estimates relating to items such as extended service plans and pensions, risks related to Signet being a Bermuda corporation, the impact of the acquisition of Zale Corporation on relationships, including with employees, suppliers, customers and competitors, an adverse decision in legal proceedings, and our ability to successfully integrate Zale Corporation’s operations and to realize synergies from the transaction.
For a discussion of these risks and other risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward looking statement, see Item 1A and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Signet undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances, except as required by law.
GAAP AND NON-GAAP MEASURES
The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations, financial condition and liquidity is based upon the consolidated financial statements of Signet which are prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The following information should be read in conjunction with Signet’s financial statements and the related notes included in Item 8.
A number of non-GAAP measures are used by management to analyze and manage the performance of the business. See Item 6 for the required disclosures related to these measures. Signet provides such non-GAAP information in reporting its financial results to give investors additional data to evaluate its operations. The Company’s management does not, nor does it suggest investors should, consider such non-GAAP measures in isolation from, or in substitution for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Exchange Translation Impact
The monthly average exchange rates are used to prepare the income statement and are calculated each month from the weekly average exchange rates weighted by sales. In Fiscal 2018, it is anticipated a five percent movement in the British pound to US dollar exchange rate would impact income before income taxes by approximately $2.2
million, while a five percent movement in the Canadian dollar to US dollar exchange rate would have a negligible impact on income before income taxes.
Transactions Affecting Comparability of Results of Operations and Liquidity and Capital Resources
The comparability of the Company’s operating results for
Fiscal 2017
,
Fiscal 2016
and
Fiscal 2015
presented herein has been affected by certain transactions, including:
|
•
|
The Zale Acquisition that closed on May 29, 2014, as described in Note 3 of Item 8, resulting in Zale contributing 247 days of performance during the year-to-date period of Fiscal 2015 based on the timing of the acquisition;
|
|
•
|
Certain transaction and integration costs;
|
|
•
|
Zale Acquisition financing as described in Note 3 and Note 20 of Item 8, including global financing arrangements; and
|
|
•
|
Certain purchase accounting adjustments.
|
48
Fiscal 2017
Overview
Same store sales decreased
1.9%
compared to an increase of 4.1% in
Fiscal 2016
; total sales were down
2.2%
to
$6,408.4 million
compared to
$6,550.2 million
in
Fiscal 2016
. Operating margin increased
120
basis points to
11.9%
compared to
10.7%
in
Fiscal 2016
. Operating income increased
8.5%
to
$763.2 million
compared to
$703.7 million
in
Fiscal 2016
. Diluted earnings per share increased
20.6%
to
$7.08
compared to
$5.87
in
Fiscal 2016
. Higher profit dollars and the increased operating margin rate were driven by operating expense reductions, a decrease in transaction/integration costs, and efficiencies in field operations and corporate support initiatives. See “GAAP and Non-GAAP Measures” section in Item 6 for additional information.
Signet’s long-term debt was
$1,317.9 million
at
January 28, 2017
and
$1,321.0 million
at
January 30, 2016
. Cash and cash equivalents were
$98.7 million
and
$137.7 million
, as of
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
, respectively. During
Fiscal 2017
, Signet repurchased
11.2 million
shares at an average cost of
$89.10
per share. Of the $1.0 billion worth of repurchases, $625.0 million were executed to offset dilution from the October preferred convertible offering.
Drivers of Operating Profitability
The key measures and drivers of operating profitability are:
|
•
|
total sales - driven by the change in same store sales and net store selling space;
|
|
•
|
gross margin; and
|
|
•
|
level of selling, general and administrative expenses.
|
Same Store Sales
Same store sales growth is calculated by comparison of sales in stores that were open in both the current and the prior fiscal year. Sales from stores that have been open for less than 12 months, including acquisitions, are excluded from the comparison until their 12-month anniversary. Sales after the 12-month anniversary are compared against the equivalent prior period sales within the comparable store sales comparison. Stores closed in the current financial period are included up to the date of closure and the comparative period is correspondingly adjusted. Stores that have been relocated or expanded, but remain within the same local geographic area, are included within the comparison with no adjustment to either the current or comparative period. Stores that have been refurbished are also included within the comparison except for the period when the refurbishment was taking place, when those stores are excluded from the comparison both for the current year and for the comparative period. Sales to employees are also excluded. Comparisons at divisional level are made in local currency and consolidated comparisons are made at constant exchange rates and exclude the effect of exchange rate movements by recalculating the prior period results as if they had been generated at the weighted average exchange rate for the current period. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and the comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website. Same store sales exclude the 53
rd
week in the fiscal year in which it occurs. Management considers same store sales useful as it is a major benchmark used by investors to judge performance within the retail industry.
Net Store Selling Space
|
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
|
Zale division
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
|
Total
Signet |
|
||||
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Openings
|
76
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
Closures
|
(28
|
)
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
Net change in store selling space
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Openings
|
60
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
Closures
|
(24
|
)
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
Net change in store selling space
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Openings
|
75
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
Closures
|
(42
|
)
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
Net change in store selling space
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
48.1
|
%
|
(1)
|
(1)
Excluding Zale division, net change in store selling space for Signet was 4% in Fiscal 2015.
n/a
Not applicable as Zale division was acquired on May 29, 2014. See Note 3 of Item 8 for additional information.
49
Cost of Sales and Gross Margin
Cost of sales is mostly composed of merchandise costs (net of discounts and allowances). Cost of sales also contains:
|
•
|
Occupancy costs such as rent, common area maintenance, depreciation and real estate tax.
|
|
•
|
Net bad debt expense and customers’ late payments primarily under the Sterling Jewelers customer finance program.
|
|
•
|
Store operating expenses such as utilities, displays and merchant credit costs.
|
|
•
|
Distribution costs including freight, processing, inventory shrinkage and related payroll.
|
As the classification of cost of sales or selling, general and administrative expenses varies from retailer to retailer and few retailers have in-house customer finance programs, Signet’s gross margin percentage may not be directly comparable to other retailers.
Factors that influence gross margin include pricing, changes in merchandise costs (principally diamonds), changes in non-merchandise components of cost of sales (as described above), changes in sales mix, foreign exchange, gold and currency hedges and the economics of services such as repairs and extended service plans. The price of diamonds varies depending on their size, cut, color and clarity. At times, Signet uses gold and currency hedges to reduce its exposure to market volatility in the cost of gold and the pound sterling to the US dollar exchange rate, but it is not able to do so for diamonds. For gold and currencies, the hedging period can extend to 24 months, although the majority of hedge contracts will normally be for a maximum of 12 months.
The percentage mix of the merchandise cost component of cost of sales, based on US dollars, is as follows:
|
|
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
|
Zale division
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
|
Total
Signet |
||||
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Diamonds
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
Gold
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
All Other
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Diamonds
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
Gold
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
All Other
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
41
|
%
|
Signet uses an average cost inventory methodology and, as jewelry inventory turns slowly, the impact of movements in the cost of diamonds and gold takes time to be fully reflected in the gross margin. Signet’s inventory turns faster in the fourth quarter than in the other three quarters, therefore, changes in the cost of merchandise is more impactful on the gross margin in that quarter. Furthermore, Signet’s hedging activities result in movements in the purchase cost of merchandise taking some time before being reflected in the gross margin. An increase in inventory turn would accelerate the rate at which commodity costs impact gross margin.
Accounts receivable comprise a large volume of transactions with no one customer representing a significant balance. The net bad debt expense includes an estimate of the allowance for losses as of the balance sheet date. The allowance is calculated using a proprietary model that analyzes factors such as delinquency rates and recovery rates. A 100% allowance is made for any amount that is more than 90 days aged on a recency basis and any amount associated with an account the owner of which has filed for bankruptcy, as well as an allowance for those 90 days aged and under based on historical loss information and payment performance. A small portion of sales under the Zale banners are financed through our in-house customer programs but represent an immaterial amount of the Company’s credit sales, receivable balance, and bad debt expense.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense (“SGA”)
SGA expense primarily includes store staff and store administrative costs as well as advertising and promotional costs. It also includes field support center expenses such as information technology, credit, finance, eCommerce and other operating expenses not specifically categorized elsewhere in the consolidated income statements.
The primary drivers of staffing costs are the number of full time equivalent employees and the level of compensation, taxes and other benefits paid. Management varies, on a store by store basis, the hours worked based on the expected level of selling activity, subject to minimum staffing levels required to operate the store. Non-store staffing levels are less variable. A significant element of compensation is performance based and is primarily dependent on sales and operating profit.
The level of advertising expenditure can vary. The largest element of advertising expenditure is national television advertising and is determined by management’s judgment of the appropriate level of advertising impressions and the cost of purchasing media.
50
Other Operating Income
Other operating income is predominantly interest income arising from in-house customer finance provided to the customers of the Sterling Jewelers division. Its level is dependent on the rate of interest charged, the credit program selected by the customer and the level of outstanding balances. The level of outstanding balances is primarily dependent on the sales of the Sterling Jewelers division, the proportion of sales that use the in-house customer finance, as well as program mix and the monthly collection rate.
Operating Income
To maintain current levels of operating income, Signet needs to achieve same store sales growth sufficient to offset any adverse movement in gross margin, any increase in operating costs, and any adverse changes in other operating income. Same store sales growth above the level required to offset the factors outlined above allows the business to achieve leverage of its cost base and improve operating income. Slower sales growth or a sales decline would normally result in reduced operating income. When foreseen, Signet may be able to reduce costs to help offset the impact of slow or negative sales growth. A key factor in driving operating income is the level of average sales per store, with higher productivity allowing leverage of expenses. The acquisition of Zale diluted operating margin for Signet. But through the execution of synergies, Signet operating margins have grown over the past two years.
Results of Operations
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
(1)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
$
|
|
% of sales
|
|
$
|
|
% of sales
|
|
$
|
|
% of sales
|
|||||||||
|
Sales
|
$
|
6,408.4
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,550.2
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,736.3
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
Cost of sales
|
(4,047.6
|
)
|
|
(63.2
|
)
|
|
(4,109.8
|
)
|
|
(62.7
|
)
|
|
(3,662.1
|
)
|
|
(63.8
|
)
|
|||
|
Gross margin
|
2,360.8
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
2,440.4
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
|
2,074.2
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(1,880.2
|
)
|
|
(29.3
|
)
|
|
(1,987.6
|
)
|
|
(30.4
|
)
|
|
(1,712.9
|
)
|
|
(29.9
|
)
|
|||
|
Other operating income, net
|
282.6
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
250.9
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
215.3
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|||
|
Operating income
|
763.2
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
703.7
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
576.6
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(49.4
|
)
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
(45.9
|
)
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
(36.0
|
)
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|||
|
Income before income taxes
|
713.8
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
657.8
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
540.6
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|||
|
Income taxes
|
(170.6
|
)
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
(189.9
|
)
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
(159.3
|
)
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|||
|
Net income
|
$
|
543.2
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
(1)
Fiscal 2015 results include Zale Corporation’s performance since the date of acquisition. See Note 3 of Item 8 for additional information.
COMPARISON OF FISCAL 2017 TO FISCAL 2016
|
•
|
Same store sales: down
1.9%
.
|
|
•
|
Operating income: up
8.5%
to
$763.2 million
. Adjusted
(1)
operating income: flat to prior year at
$808.4 million
.
|
|
•
|
Operating margin: increased to
11.9%
, up 120 basis points. Adjusted
(1)
operating margin: up 30 basis points to
12.6%
.
|
|
•
|
Diluted earnings per share: up
20.6%
to
$7.08
. Adjusted
(1)
diluted earnings per share: up 8.6% to
$7.45
.
|
|
(1)
|
Non-GAAP measure, see Item 6. The Company uses adjusted metrics, which adjust for purchase accounting and costs incurred principally in relation to the Zale Acquisition including transaction and integration expenses.
|
In
Fiscal 2017
, Signet’s same store sales decreased by
1.9%
, compared to an increase of
4.1%
in
Fiscal 2016
. Total sales were
$6,408.4 million
compared to
$6,550.2 million
in
Fiscal 2016
, down
$141.8 million
or
2.2%
compared to an increase of
14.2%
in
Fiscal 2016
. Merchandise categories and collections were broadly lower most notably in the mall selling channel, while select merchandise and selling channels performed relatively well, such as diamond fashion jewelry, bracelets, earrings, and the off-mall and kiosk selling channels. eCommerce sales were $363.1 million and 5.7% of sales compared to $359.6 million and 5.5% of sales in
Fiscal 2016
. The breakdown of Signet’s sales performance is set out in the table below.
51
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fiscal 2017
|
Same store sales
(1)
|
|
Non-same
store sales, net (2) |
|
Total sales at
constant exchange rate (3) |
|
Exchange
translation impact (3) |
|
Total sales
as reported |
|
Total sales
(in millions) |
|||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
3,930.4
|
|
|
Zale Jewelry
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,549.7
|
|
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
263.1
|
|
|
Zale division
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,812.8
|
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
(13.2
|
)%
|
|
(12.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
647.1
|
|
|
Other
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
18.1
|
|
||||
|
Signet
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
6,408.4
|
|
|
Adjusted Signet
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,421.7
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
(2)
Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(3)
Non-GAAP measure, see Item 6.
(4)
Includes sales from Signet’s diamond sourcing initiative.
Sterling Jewelers sales
In
Fiscal 2017
, Sterling Jewelers total sales were
$3,930.4 million
, down
1.5%
, compared to
$3,988.7 million
in
Fiscal 2016
, and same store sales decreased
2.6%
compared to an increase of 3.7% in
Fiscal 2016
. Sales performance was led by fashion jewelry such as Ever Us and non-branded earrings and bracelets. Bridal performance was led by Vera Wang Love, Neil Lane, the newly introduced Chosen assortment, and non-branded rings. The average merchandise transaction value (“ATV”) increased driven by mix with particular strength in higher-value diamond jewelry, coupled with declines in select lower average selling price point collections such as Charmed Memories and watches. The number of merchandise transactions decreased due to the same dynamic. Mix of merchandise increased toward higher-value, less-transactional collections (e.g. Ever Us) in lieu of higher-transactional, lower-value collections (e.g. Charmed Memories).
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes smaller concept Jared stores such as Jared Vault and Jared Jewelry Boutique.
|
(1)
Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales on a same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.
|
(2)
|
Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales, net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise sales are sales tax in the US, repairs, warranty, insurance, employee and other miscellaneous sales.
|
52
Zale division sales
The Zale division’s
Fiscal 2017
sales were
$1,812.8 million
compared to
$1,811.4 million
in
Fiscal 2016
. Zale Jewelry contributed
$1,549.7 million
and Piercing Pagoda contributed
$263.1 million
of revenues, compared to
$1,568.2 million
and
$243.2 million
, respectively, in the prior year. Total Zale division sales included purchase accounting adjustments of
$13.3 million
and
$27.2 million
in
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively, related to a reduction of deferred revenue associated with extended warranty sales. Same store sales decreased
1.2%
compared to an increase of 4.8% in
Fiscal 2016
. Zale sales growth was led by diamond fashion jewelry such as Ever Us and Endless Brilliance. This was offset by a decline in select bridal collections, solitaires, and loose diamond sales. Zale division ATV increased
5.3%
, while the number of transactions decreased
5.8%
. Zale had greater sales productivity in higher-value, lower-transactional collections (e.g. Vera Wang Fashion, Ever Us). Piercing Pagoda ATV increased
13.7%
, while the number of transactions decreased
6.2%
due to merchandise mix toward higher priced gold and diamond assortments.
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fiscal 2017
|
Same store sales
(1)(2)
|
|
Non-same
store sales, net |
|
Total sales at
constant exchange
rate
|
|
Exchange
translation impact |
|
Total sales
as reported |
|
Total sales
(in millions) |
|||||||
|
Zales
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,257.4
|
|
|
Gordon’s
|
(12.2
|
)%
|
|
(14.3
|
)%
|
|
(26.5
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
(26.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
57.7
|
|
|
Zale US Jewelry
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,315.1
|
|
|
Peoples
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
204.9
|
|
|
Mappins
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
|
(6.9
|
)%
|
|
(11.1
|
)%
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
(12.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
29.7
|
|
|
Zale Canada Jewelry
|
(4.5
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
(4.5
|
)%
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
(5.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
234.6
|
|
|
Total Zale Jewelry
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,549.7
|
|
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
263.1
|
|
|
Zale division
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,812.8
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. Same store sales include merchandise and repair sales and excludes warranty and insurance revenues. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
|
|
Average Merchandise Transaction Value
(1)(2)
|
|
Merchandise Transactions
|
||||||||||
|
|
Average Value
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
Change from previous year
|
||||||||
|
Fiscal Year
(4)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
||||||
|
Zales
|
$
|
460
|
|
|
$
|
451
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
Gordon’s
|
$
|
435
|
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
(13.1
|
)%
|
|
Peoples
(3)
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
376
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
(10.9
|
)%
|
|
Mappins
(3)
|
$
|
347
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
(8.4
|
)%
|
|
Total Zale Jewelry
|
$
|
424
|
|
|
$
|
410
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
(5.3
|
)%
|
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
(6.2
|
)%
|
|
Zale division
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
(1)
Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales on a same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.
|
(2)
|
Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise sales are repairs, warranty, insurance, employee and other miscellaneous sales.
|
|
(3)
|
Amounts for Zale Canada Jewelry stores are denominated in Canadian dollars.
|
|
(4)
|
Change from prior year for average merchandise transaction value and merchandise transactions only includes Fiscal 2017 as Signet did not own Zale division for the entire comparable period in Fiscal 2016 due to timing of Zale acquisition in May 2014.
|
UK Jewelry sales
In
Fiscal 2017
, the UK Jewelry division’s total sales were
$647.1 million
, down
12.3%
, compared to
$737.6 million
in
Fiscal 2016
and up
0.9%
at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). Same store sales increased by
0.1%
compared to an increase of 4.9% in
Fiscal 2016
. ATV increased
6.0%
, led by bridal jewelry, prestige watches, and select fashion diamond jewelry, offset by a
6.3%
decrease in the number of transactions.
53
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fiscal 2017
|
Same
store sales (1) |
|
Non-same
store sales, net (2) |
|
Total sales at
constant exchange rate (3) |
|
Exchange
translation impact (3) |
|
Total
sales as reported |
|
Total
sales (in millions) |
|||||||
|
H.Samuel
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
(13.0
|
)%
|
|
(13.9
|
)%
|
|
$
|
323.5
|
|
|
Ernest Jones
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
(13.4
|
)%
|
|
(10.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
323.6
|
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
(13.2
|
)%
|
|
(12.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
647.1
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
(2)
Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(3)
Non-GAAP measure, see Item 6.
|
|
Average Merchandise Transaction Value
(1)(2)
|
|
Merchandise Transactions
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Average Value
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
Change from previous year
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fiscal Year
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||||||
|
H.Samuel
|
£
|
77
|
|
|
£
|
75
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
(4.9
|
)%
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
Ernest Jones
|
£
|
309
|
|
|
£
|
271
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
(11.3
|
)%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
£
|
124
|
|
|
£
|
117
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
(6.3
|
)%
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
(1)
Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales on a same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.
|
(2)
|
Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales, including value added tax (“VAT”), net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise sales are repairs, warranty, insurance, employee and other miscellaneous sales.
|
Fourth Quarter Sales
In the fourth quarter, Signet’s total sales were
$2,269.9 million
, down
$122.7 million
or
5.1%
, compared to an increase of
5.1%
in the prior year fourth quarter. Same store sales were down
4.5%
compared to an increase of
4.9%
in the prior year fourth quarter. Merchandise categories and collections were broadly lower most notably in the mall and e-commerce selling channels. Select merchandise and selling channels performed relatively well such as diamond fashion jewelry, bracelets, earrings, and the off-mall and kiosk selling channels. E-commerce sales in the fourth quarter were
$161.8 million
or 7.1% of total sales, compared to
$166.3 million
or 7.0% of total sales in the prior year fourth quarter. The breakdown of the sales performance is set out in the table below.
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fourth quarter of Fiscal 2017
|
Same
store sales (1) |
|
Non-same
store sales, net (2) |
|
Total sales at
constant exchange rate (3) |
|
Exchange
translation impact (3) |
|
Total
sales as reported |
|
Total
sales (in millions) |
|||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
(4.9
|
)%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,398.1
|
|
|
Zale Jewelry
|
(5.2
|
)%
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
554.9
|
|
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
83.7
|
|
|
Zale division
|
(3.9
|
)%
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
(2.8
|
)%
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
(2.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
638.6
|
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
|
(16.2
|
)%
|
|
(19.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
227.6
|
|
|
Other
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
||||
|
Signet
|
(4.5
|
)%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
|
$
|
2,269.9
|
|
|
Adjusted Signet
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,272.5
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
(2)
Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(3)
Non-GAAP measure, see Item 6.
(4)
Includes sales from Signet’s diamond sourcing initiative.
Sterling Jewelers sales
In the fourth quarter, the Sterling Jewelers division’s total sales were
$1,398.1 million
compared to $1,452.5 million in the prior year fourth quarter, a decline of
3.7%
. Same store sales decreased
4.9%
, compared to an increase of 5.0% in the prior year fourth quarter. Sales performance in the fourth quarter was driven by broad-based declines across merchandise categories and under performance in the mall and e-commerce channels. This was partially offset by higher sales of diamond fashion jewelry and Vera Wang Love bridal. Sterling Jewelers’ ATV increased
7.0%
and the number of transactions decreased
11.4%
. ATV increased driven by mix with particular strength in higher-value diamond jewelry, coupled with declines in select lower average selling price point collections such as Charmed Memories and watches. The number of merchandise transactions decreased due to the same dynamic.
54
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Fourth quarter of Fiscal 2017
|
Same
store sales (1) |
|
Non-same
store sales, net (2) |
|
Total
sales as reported |
|
Total
sales (in millions) |
|||||
|
Kay
|
(5.0
|
)%
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
915.2
|
|
|
Jared
(3)
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
430.6
|
|
|
Regional brands
|
(16.4
|
)%
|
|
(11.2
|
)%
|
|
(27.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
52.3
|
|
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
(4.9
|
)%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,398.1
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
(2)
Includes all sales from stores not open or owned for 12 months.
(3)
Includes smaller concept Jared stores such as Jared Vault and Jared Jewelry Boutique.
|
|
Average Merchandise Transaction Value
(1)(2)
|
|
Merchandise Transactions
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Average Value
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
Change from previous year
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fourth quarter
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||||||
|
Kay
|
$
|
429
|
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
(10.8
|
)%
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
Jared
|
$
|
530
|
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
(3.4
|
)%
|
|
(10.8
|
)%
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
Regional brands
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
(23.3
|
)%
|
|
(8.9
|
)%
|
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
$
|
457
|
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
(11.4
|
)%
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
(1)
Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales on a same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.
|
(2)
|
Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales, net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise sales are sales tax in the US, repairs, warranty, insurance, employee and other miscellaneous sales.
|
Zale sales
In the fourth quarter, the Zale division’s total sales were
$638.6 million
compared to $655.1 million in the prior year fourth quarter, down
2.5%
. Same store sales decreased
3.9%
, compared to an increase of 4.7% in the prior year fourth quarter. Total Zale division sales included purchase accounting adjustments of
$2.6 million
and $5.2 million related to a reduction of deferred revenue associated with extended warranty sales in the fourth quarter of
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively.
Zale Jewelry contributed
$554.9 million
of sales, a decrease of
3.8%
from the prior year fourth quarter sales. Same store sales declined by
5.2%
compared to an increase of 4.4% in prior year fourth quarter. Zale Jewelry ATV increased
2.4%
, while the number of transactions decreased
7.4%
. Increases in higher-price point diamond fashion jewelry and bracelets were more than offset by declines across all other merchandise categories.
Piercing Pagoda contributed
$83.7 million
of sales, an increase of
7.2%
over prior year fourth quarter sales. Piercing Pagoda same store sales increased
5.7%
compared to an increase of 6.4% in prior year fourth quarter. Piercing Pagoda ATV increased
12.7%
principally driven by strong sales of gold, religious and children’s jewelry, while the number of transactions decreased
5.6%
primarily as a result of lower piercings.
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fourth quarter of Fiscal 2017
|
Same store sales
(1)
|
|
Non-same
store sales, net (2) |
|
Total sales at
constant exchange
rate
(3)
|
|
Exchange
translation impact (3) |
|
Total sales
as reported |
|
Total sales
(in millions) |
|||||||
|
Zales
|
(4.5
|
)%
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
$
|
452.5
|
|
|
Gordon’s
|
(13.3
|
)%
|
|
(17.7
|
)%
|
|
(31.0
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
(31.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
18.7
|
|
|
Zale US Jewelry
|
(4.9
|
)%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
471.2
|
|
|
Peoples
|
(7.6
|
)%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
(7.1
|
)%
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
(4.9
|
)%
|
|
$
|
73.2
|
|
|
Mappins
|
(3.9
|
)%
|
|
(8.6
|
)%
|
|
(12.5
|
)%
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
(10.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
10.5
|
|
|
Zale Canada Jewelry
|
(7.2
|
)%
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
(7.8
|
)%
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
(5.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
83.7
|
|
|
Total Zale Jewelry
|
(5.2
|
)%
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
554.9
|
|
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
83.7
|
|
|
Zale division
(4)
|
(3.9
|
)%
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
(2.8
|
)%
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
(2.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
638.6
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. Same store sales include merchandise and repair sales and excludes warranty and insurance revenues. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
(2)
Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(3)
Non-GAAP measure, see Item 6.
(4)
The Zale division same store sales includes merchandise and repair sales and excludes warranty and insurance revenues.
55
|
|
Average Merchandise Transaction Value
(1)(2)
|
|
Merchandise Transactions
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Average Value
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
Change from previous year
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fourth quarter
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||||||
|
Zales
|
$
|
421
|
|
|
$
|
418
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
Gordon’s
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
(14.5
|
)%
|
|
(7.9
|
)%
|
|
Peoples
(3)
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
(13.4
|
)%
|
|
(6.7
|
)%
|
|
Mappins
(3)
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
(12.9
|
)%
|
|
(7.3
|
)%
|
|
Total Zale Jewelry
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
$
|
378
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
(7.4
|
)%
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
(5.6
|
)%
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
Zale division
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
(6.5
|
)%
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
(1)
Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales on a same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.
|
(2)
|
Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise sales are repairs, warranty, insurance, employee and other miscellaneous sales.
|
|
(3)
|
Amounts for Zale Canada Jewelry stores are denominated in Canadian dollars.
|
UK Jewelry sales
In the fourth quarter, the UK Jewelry division’s total sales were down by
19.5%
to
$227.6 million
compared to $282.6 million in the prior year fourth quarter and down
3.3%
at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). Same store sales decreased
3.8%
compared to an increase of 4.7% in the prior year fourth quarter. Average merchandise transaction value increased
8.0%
and the number of transactions decreased
11.8%
. The results were driven principally by weaker sales of highly-transactional merchandise such as fashion jewelry, fashion watches and gifts, offset by stronger sales of prestige watches and bridal jewelry.
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fourth quarter of Fiscal 2017
|
Same
store sales (1) |
|
Non-same
store sales, net (2) |
|
Total sales at
constant exchange rate (3) |
|
Exchange
translation impact (3) |
|
Total
sales as reported |
|
Total
sales (in millions) |
|||||||
|
H.Samuel
|
(5.3
|
)%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
(4.9
|
)%
|
|
(15.9
|
)%
|
|
(20.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
119.7
|
|
|
Ernest Jones
(4)
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
(16.4
|
)%
|
|
(17.9
|
)%
|
|
$
|
107.9
|
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
|
(16.2
|
)%
|
|
(19.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
227.6
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
(2)
Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(3)
Non-GAAP measure, see Item 6.
(4)
Includes stores selling under the Leslie Davis nameplate.
|
|
Average Merchandise Transaction Value
(1)(2)
|
|
Merchandise Transactions
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Average Value
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
Change from previous year
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fourth quarter
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||||||
|
H.Samuel
|
£
|
78
|
|
|
£
|
75
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
(10.3
|
)%
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
Ernest Jones
(3)
|
£
|
299
|
|
|
£
|
253
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
(17.5
|
)%
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
£
|
121
|
|
|
£
|
112
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
(11.8
|
)%
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
(1)
Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales on a same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.
|
(2)
|
Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales, including value added tax (“VAT”), net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise sales are repairs, warranty, insurance, employee and other miscellaneous sales.
|
(3)
Includes stores selling under the Leslie Davis nameplate.
56
Cost of Sales and Gross Margin
In
Fiscal 2017
, gross margin was
$2,360.8 million
or
36.8%
of sales compared to
$2,440.4 million
or
37.3%
of sales in
Fiscal 2016
. The decrease in gross margin dollars was attributable to lower sales and higher bad debt expense offset in part by decreased effect of purchase accounting adjustments of
$11.3 million
compared to
$35.6 million
. Adjusted gross margin was
$2,372.1 million
or
36.9%
of adjusted sales compared to
$2,476.0 million
or
37.6%
in the prior year (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). The decrease in the adjusted gross margin rate from prior year of 70 basis points was principally due to lower sales, higher bad debt expense and de-leverage on store occupancy costs.
|
•
|
The Sterling Jewelers division gross margin dollars decreased $64.0 million compared to
Fiscal 2016
, reflecting decreased sales and a decline in the gross margin rate of 100 basis points due to higher bad debt expense and de-leverage on store occupancy costs. Gross merchandise margin rate was flat to prior year.
|
|
•
|
In the Zale division, gross margin dollars increased $24.0 million compared to
Fiscal 2016
, primarily attributable to the decreased effect of purchase accounting adjustments which totaled $11.3 million in
Fiscal 2017
and $35.6 million in the prior year. The adjusted gross margin dollars were virtually flat to prior year and the rate increased 30 basis points reflecting higher merchandise margins of 100 basis points, offset in part by de-leverage on store occupancy costs.
|
|
•
|
In the UK Jewelry division, gross margin dollars decreased $39.5 million compared to
Fiscal 2016
, reflecting gross margin rate decrease of 170 basis points. The decreases in dollars and rate were driven principally by lower sales, de-leverage on store occupancy, a 90 basis point decline in the gross merchandise margin rate, including the unfavorable effect of foreign exchange.
|
In the fourth quarter, the consolidated gross margin was
$945.5 million
or
41.7%
of sales compared to
$1,016.0 million
or
42.5%
of sales in the prior year fourth quarter. Adjusted gross margin was
$947.2 million
or
41.7%
of adjusted sales compared to
$1,020.7 million
or
42.6%
in the prior year fourth quarter (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). The declines in both the consolidated gross margin and adjusted gross margin were driven principally by lower sales leading to de-leverage on fixed costs as well as incremental promotional activity resulting in a flat merchandise margin rate to last year.
The declines in both gross margin and adjusted gross margin were driven principally by lower sales leading to deleverage on fixed costs as well as more promotional activity.
|
•
|
Gross margin dollars in the Sterling Jewelers division decreased
$41.2 million
compared to prior year fourth quarter, while the gross margin rate decreased
120
basis points due primarily to lower sales which de-leveraged fixed costs, such as store occupancy. In addition, higher bad debt expense and incremental promotional activity unfavorably impacted the gross margin rate.
|
|
•
|
In the Zale division, gross margin dollars decreased
$2.3 million
compared to prior year fourth quarter. Included in gross margin were purchase accounting adjustments totaling
$1.6 million
compared to
$4.7 million
in prior year fourth quarter. Adjusted gross margin dollars in the Zale division decreased
$5.3 million
compared to the prior year fourth quarter. The adjusted gross margin rate increased 40 basis points with higher merchandise margins of 120 basis points more than offsetting de-leverage of fixed costs on lower sales.
|
|
•
|
In the UK Jewelry division, gross margin dollars decreased
$26.6 million
compared to
Fiscal 2016
, while the gross margin rate decreased
220
basis points driven principally by de-leverage on lower sales and lower merchandise margins due to increased promotional activity.
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for
Fiscal 2017
were
$1,880.2 million
or
29.3%
of sales compared to
$1,987.6 million
or
30.4%
of sales in
Fiscal 2016
, down
$107.4 million
. The decrease was attributable to lower variable compensation costs due to lower sales and a reduction in integration costs primarily as a result of the $34.2 million appraisal settlement in the prior year. Included in SGA were unfavorable purchase accounting adjustments of
$5.5 million
and integration costs of
$28.4 million
in
Fiscal 2017
compared to favorable purchase accounting adjustments of
$9.2 million
and transaction and integration costs of
$78.9 million
in
Fiscal 2016
. Adjusted SGA was
$1,846.3 million
or
28.7%
of adjusted sales compared to
29.1%
in the prior year (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). The decrease in dollars and rate was driven primarily by lower variable compensation due to lower sales, lower advertising expense, merchant fee savings in Zale credit programs and favorable foreign exchange translation, offset in part by higher information technology (“IT”) expense associated with Signet’s IT modernization roadmap.
In the fourth quarter, SGA expense was
$615.3 million
or
27.1%
of sales compared to
$686.6 million
or
28.7%
of sales in the prior year fourth quarter. The decrease was attributable to lower variable compensation costs due to lower sales and a reduction in integration costs including consulting costs incurred in connection with the Zale integration, severance related to organizational changes and expenses associated with the settlement of miscellaneous legal matters pending as of the date of the Zale acquisition. Included in SGA were unfavorable purchase accounting adjustments of
$1.6 million
and integration costs of
$9.9 million
compared to unfavorable purchase accounting adjustments of
$1.5 million
and integration costs of
$19.1 million
in the prior year fourth quarter. Adjusted SGA was
$603.8 million
or
26.6%
of adjusted sales compared to
27.8%
in the prior year (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). The 120 basis point decrease in SGA rate was driven primarily by lower variable compensation including short-term and long-term incentive compensation, impact of synergies, lower advertising expense, merchant fee savings in Zale credit programs and foreign exchange translation. Offsetting these items was higher IT expense associated with Signet’s IT modernization roadmap.
57
Other Operating Income, Net
In
Fiscal 2017
, other operating income, net was
$282.6 million
or
4.4%
of sales compared to
$250.9 million
or
3.8%
of sales in
Fiscal 2016
. In the fourth quarter, other operating income, net was
$69.0 million
or
3.0%
of sales compared to
$63.7 million
or
2.6%
of sales in the prior year fourth quarter. The year-over-year increase was primarily attributable to higher interest income earned from higher outstanding receivable balances.
Operating Income
In
Fiscal 2017
, operating income was
$763.2 million
or
11.9%
of sales compared to
$703.7 million
or
10.7%
of sales in
Fiscal 2016
. Included in operating income were purchase accounting adjustments of
$16.8 million
and transaction and integration costs of
$28.4 million
. Adjusted operating income was
$808.4 million
or
12.6%
of adjusted sales compared to
12.3%
in the prior year (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6).
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
$
|
|
% of sales
|
|
$
|
|
% of sales
|
||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
$
|
715.8
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
718.6
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
|
Zale division
(1)
|
73.4
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
52.1
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
||
|
UK Jewelry division
|
45.6
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
||
|
Other
(2)
|
(71.6
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
|
(128.5
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
||
|
Operating income
|
$
|
763.2
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
703.7
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Zale division includes net operating loss impact of
$16.8 million
for purchase accounting adjustments. Excluding the impact from accounting adjustments, Zale division’s operating income was
$90.2 million
or
5.0%
of sales. The Zale division operating income included
$62.2 million
from Zale Jewelry or
4.0%
of sales and
$11.2 million
from Piercing Pagoda or
4.3%
of sales. In the prior year, Zale division includes net operating loss impact of $26.4 million for purchase accounting adjustments. Excluding the impact from accounting adjustments, Zale division’s operating income was $78.5 million or 4.3% of sales. The Zale division operating income included $44.3 million from Zale Jewelry or 2.8% of sales and $7.8 million from Piercing Pagoda or 3.2% of sales.
|
|
(2)
|
Other includes
$28.4 million
and
$78.9 million
of transaction and integration expenses in
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively. Transaction and integration costs include legal settlement of $34.2 million over appraisal rights, and expenses associated with legal, tax, accounting, information technology implementation, consulting and severance.
|
|
nm
|
Not meaningful.
|
In the fourth quarter, operating income was
$399.2 million
or
17.6%
of sales compared to
$393.1 million
or
16.4%
of sales in prior year fourth quarter. Included in operating income were purchase accounting adjustments of
$3.3 million
and transaction and integration costs of
$9.9 million
. Adjusted operating income was
$412.4 million
or
18.1%
of adjusted sales compared to
17.4%
in the prior year (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6).
|
|
Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2016
|
||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
$
|
|
% of sales
|
|
$
|
|
% of sales
|
||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
$
|
298.0
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
305.4
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
Zale division
(1)
|
71.7
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
63.0
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
||
|
UK Jewelry division
|
42.6
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
57.8
|
|
|
20.5
|
%
|
||
|
Other
(2)
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
|
(33.1
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
||
|
Operating income
|
$
|
399.2
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
393.1
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Zale division includes net operating loss impact of
$3.3 million
for purchase accounting adjustments. Excluding the impact from accounting adjustments, Zale division’s operating income was
$75.0 million
or
11.7%
of sales. The Zale division operating income included
$62.7 million
from Zale Jewelry or
11.3%
of sales and
$9.0 million
from Piercing Pagoda or
10.8%
of sales. In the prior year fourth quarter, Zale division includes net operating loss impact of $6.2 million for purchase accounting adjustments. Excluding the impact from accounting adjustments, Zale division’s operating income was $69.2 million or 10.6% of sales. The Zale division operating income included $54.2 million from Zale Jewelry or 9.4% of sales and $8.8 million from Piercing Pagoda or 11.3% of sales.
|
|
(2)
|
Other includes
$9.9 million
and
$19.1 million
of transaction and integration expenses in
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively. Transaction and integration costs include expenses associated with legal, tax, information technology implementation, consulting and severance.
|
|
nm
|
Not meaningful.
|
Interest Expense, Net
In
Fiscal 2017
, net interest expense was
$49.4 million
compared to
$45.9 million
in
Fiscal 2016
. The weighted average interest rate for the Company’s debt outstanding was 2.8% compared to 2.6% in the prior year.
In the fourth quarter, net interest expense was
$13.0 million
compared to
$12.1 million
in the prior year fourth quarter. The weighted average interest rate for the Company’s debt outstanding was 2.9% compared to 2.7% in the prior year fourth quarter.
Income Before Income Taxes
In
Fiscal 2017
, income before income taxes increased $56.0 million to
$713.8 million
or
11.1%
of sales compared to
$657.8 million
or
10.0%
of sales in
Fiscal 2016
.
In the fourth quarter, income before income taxes increased $5.2 million to
$386.2 million
or
17.0%
of sales compared to
$381.0 million
or
15.9%
of sales in the prior year fourth quarter.
58
Income Taxes
Income tax expense for
Fiscal 2017
was
$170.6 million
compared to
$189.9 million
in
Fiscal 2016
, with an effective tax rate of
23.9%
for
Fiscal 2017
compared to
28.9%
in
Fiscal 2016
. In the fourth quarter, income tax expense was
$88.7 million
compared to
$109.1 million
in the prior year fourth quarter. The lower effective tax rate in Fiscal 2017 was driven principally by income mix by jurisdiction and effect of global reinsurance and financing arrangements, including certain intra-entity debt agreements which mature on various dates between fiscal year 2022 and 2027.
Net Income
Net income for
Fiscal 2017
was up
16.1%
to
$543.2 million
or
8.5%
of sales compared to
$467.9 million
or
7.1%
of sales in
Fiscal 2016
.
For the fourth quarter, net income was up
9.4%
to
$297.5 million
or
13.1%
of sales compared to
$271.9 million
or
11.4%
of sales in the prior year fourth quarter.
Earnings per Share
For
Fiscal 2017
, diluted earnings per share were
$7.08
compared to
$5.87
in
Fiscal 2016
, an increase of
20.6%
. Adjusted diluted earnings per share were
$7.45
compared to
$6.86
in the prior year (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). The weighted average diluted number of common shares outstanding was
76.7 million
compared to
79.7 million
in
Fiscal 2016
. Signet repurchased
11.2 million
shares in
Fiscal 2017
compared to
1.0 million
shares in
Fiscal 2016
.
For the fourth quarter, diluted earnings per share were
$3.92
compared to
$3.42
in the prior year fourth quarter, up
14.6%
. Adjusted diluted earnings per share were
$4.03
compared to
$3.63
in the prior year fourth quarter (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). The weighted average diluted number of common shares outstanding was
75.8 million
compared to
79.4 million
in the prior year fourth quarter.
The Company issued preferred shares on October 5, 2016, which include a cumulative dividend right and may be converted into common shares. The Company’s computation of diluted earnings per share includes the effect of potential common shares for outstanding awards issued under the Company’s share-based compensation plans and preferred shares upon conversion, if dilutive. In computing diluted EPS, the Company also adjusts the numerator used in the basic EPS computation, subject to anti-dilution requirements, to add back the dividends (declared or cumulative undeclared) applicable to the preferred shares. For the fourth quarter and year to date periods, the preferred shares were more dilutive if conversion was assumed. See Item 8 for additional information related to the preferred shares (Note 5) or the calculation of earnings per share (Note 7).
Dividends per Common Share
In
Fiscal 2017
, dividends of
$1.04
were declared by the Board of Directors compared to
$0.88
in
Fiscal 2016
.
COMPARISON OF FISCAL 2016 TO FISCAL 2015
|
•
|
Same store sales: up 4.1%.
|
|
•
|
Operating income: up 22.0% to $703.7 million. Adjusted
(1)
operating income: up 18.6% to $809.0 million.
|
|
•
|
Operating margin: increased to 10.7%, up 70 basis points. Adjusted
(1)
operating margin: up 50 basis points to 12.3%.
|
|
•
|
Diluted earnings per share: up 23.6% to $5.87. Adjusted
(1)
diluted earnings per share: up 21.8% to $6.86.
|
|
(1)
|
Non-GAAP measure, see Item 6. The Company uses adjusted metrics, which adjust for purchase accounting and costs incurred principally in relation to the Zale Acquisition including transaction and integration expenses.
|
In Fiscal 2016, Signet’s same store sales increased by 4.1%, compared to an increase of 4.1% in Fiscal 2015. Total sales were $6,550.2 million compared to $5,736.3 million in Fiscal 2015, up $813.9 million or 14.2% compared to an increase of 36.3% in Fiscal 2015. Bridal sales were nearly half of total merchandise sales, down 10 basis points versus prior year due to strong sales of fashion jewelry collections such as Ever Us. eCommerce sales were $359.6 million and 5.5% of sales compared to $283.6 million and 4.9% of sales in Fiscal 2015. The breakdown of Signet’s sales performance is set out in the table below.
59
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fiscal 2016
|
Same store sales
(1)
|
|
Non-same
store sales, net (2) |
|
Total sales at
constant exchange rate (3) |
|
Exchange
translation impact (3) |
|
Total sales
as reported |
|
Total sales
(in millions) |
|||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,988.7
|
|
|
Zale Jewelry
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,568.2
|
|
||||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
243.2
|
|
||||
|
Zale division
(4)
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,811.4
|
|
||||
|
UK Jewelry division
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
(6.7
|
)%
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
737.6
|
|
|
Other
(5)
|
—
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
nm
|
|
|
$
|
12.5
|
|
|
Signet
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,550.2
|
|
|
Adjusted Signet
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,577.4
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
(2)
Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(3)
Non-GAAP measure, see Item 6.
|
(4)
|
Zale division results in the prior year reflect the 247 days of performance subsequent to the acquisition of Zale Corporation as of May 29, 2014.
|
(5)
Includes sales from Signet’s diamond sourcing initiative.
nm Not meaningful.
Sterling Jewelers sales
In Fiscal 2016, Sterling Jewelers total sales were up 5.9% to $3,988.7 million compared to $3,765.0 million in Fiscal 2015, and same store sales increased 3.7% compared to an increase of 4.8% in Fiscal 2015. Sales increases were broad based and driven by a combination of factors primarily in Kay Jewelers stores. Growth was led by fashion jewelry such as Ever Us, Diamonds in Rhythm, and non-branded earrings and bracelets. Bridal also grew led by Neil Lane, Vera Wang Love, and non-branded rings. Branded, differentiated, and exclusive (“branded”) merchandise in Sterling Jewelers increased 30 basis points to 32.6% of Sterling Jeweler’s merchandise sales. The average merchandise transaction value increased driven by improved mix with particular strength in diamond jewelry coupled with declines in select lower average selling price point collections such as Charmed Memories. The number of merchandise transactions decreased due to the same dynamic. Mix of merchandise increased for higher-value, less-transactional collections (e.g. Ever Us) in lieu of higher-transactional, lower-value collections (e.g. Charmed Memories). This trend of higher average merchandise transaction value and lower transactions existed for Kay as well as for Sterling Jewelers overall. In Jared, the average merchandise transaction value was flat to prior year and the number of merchandise transactions decreased due to merchandise mix.
|
|
Changes from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Fiscal 2016
|
Same
store sales (1) |
|
Non-same
store sales, net (2) |
|
Total
sales as reported |
|
Total
sales (in millions) |
|||||
|
Kay
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,530.3
|
|
|
Jared
(3)
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,252.9
|
|
|
Regional brands
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
(7.5
|
)%
|
|
(8.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
205.5
|
|
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,988.7
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes smaller concept Jared stores such as Jared Vault and Jared Jewelry Boutique.
|
|
|
Average Merchandise Transaction Value
(1)(2)
|
|
Merchandise Transactions
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Average Value
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
Change from previous year
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fiscal 2016
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||||
|
Kay
|
$
|
429
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
Jared
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
Regional brands
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
407
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
(6.0
|
)%
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
$
|
462
|
|
|
$
|
441
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
(1)
Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales on a same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.
|
(2)
|
Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales, net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise sales are sales tax in the US, repairs, warranty, insurance, employee and other miscellaneous sales.
|
60
Zale sales
As Zale was acquired May 29, 2014, there is no comparable period presented. The Zale division’s Fiscal 2016 sales were $1,811.4 million. Zale Jewelry contributed $1,568.2 million and Piercing Pagoda contributed $243.2 million of revenues. Total Zale division sales included purchase accounting adjustments of $(27.2) million related to a reduction of deferred revenue associated with extended warranty sales. Same store sales increased 4.8%. Similar to Sterling Jewelers, Zale sales growth was led by fashion jewelry particularly in collections that were cross-sold between divisions such as Ever Us and LeVian. Bridal also increased led by Vera Wang Love. Zale division average merchandise transaction value increased 4.6% while the number of transactions were flat. Like Sterling, Zale had greater sales productivity in high-value, lower-transactional collections (e.g. Ever Us). This was especially the case in Piercing Pagoda (average merchandise transaction value up 10.9%; number of transactions down 1.2%) and to a lesser degree at the Zale Jewelry segment (average merchandise transaction value up 2.8%; number of transactions up 1.6%). Branded merchandise was 42.9% of the Zale division’s merchandise sales.
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Fiscal 2016
|
Same store sales
(1)
|
|
Non-same
store sales, net |
|
Total sales at
constant exchange rate |
|
Exchange
translation impact |
|
Total sales
as reported |
|
Total sales
(in millions) |
|||
|
Zales
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,241.0
|
|
|
Gordon’s
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
78.5
|
|
|
Zale US Jewelry
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,319.5
|
|
|
Peoples
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
214.8
|
|
|
Mappins
|
(2.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33.9
|
|
|
Zale Canada Jewelry
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
248.7
|
|
|
Total Zale Jewelry
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,568.2
|
|
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
243.2
|
|
|
Zale division
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,811.4
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. Same store sales includes merchandise and repair sales and excludes warranty and insurance revenues. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
UK Jewelry sales
In Fiscal 2016, the UK Jewelry division’s total sales were down 0.8% to $737.6 million compared to $743.6 million in Fiscal 2015 and up 5.9% at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). Same store sales increased by 4.9% compared to an increase of 5.3% in Fiscal 2015. Sales performance in the UK Jewelry division was driven by growth in average merchandise transaction value and number of transactions, 2.7% and 1.8% respectively, led by branded diamond jewelry and watches. In H.Samuel, average merchandise transaction value increased 1.4% driven by strong diamond sales. Increases in the number of transactions of 1.9% were influenced by higher sales of beads and Perfect Fit, the entry-level priced engagement ring collection. In Ernest Jones, the average merchandise transaction value and number of transactions increased 6.3% and 1.4%, respectively. The sales mix shifted toward jewelry brands and prestige watches. Transaction increases in Ernest Jones were driven by strength across jewelry and watch categories due in part to new product assortment and new television advertising.
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fiscal 2016
|
Same
store sales (1) |
|
Non-same
store sales, net (2) |
|
Total sales at
constant exchange rate (3) |
|
Exchange
translation impact (3) |
|
Total
sales as reported |
|
Total
sales (in millions) |
|||||||
|
H.Samuel
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
(6.5
|
)%
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
375.8
|
|
|
Ernest Jones
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
361.8
|
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
(6.7
|
)%
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
737.6
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
(2)
Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(3)
Non-GAAP measure, see Item 6.
61
|
|
Average Merchandise Transaction Value
(1)(2)
|
|
Merchandise Transactions
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Average Value
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
Change from previous year
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fiscal 2016
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||||
|
H.Samuel
|
£
|
75
|
|
|
£
|
74
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
Ernest Jones
|
£
|
268
|
|
|
£
|
252
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
£
|
115
|
|
|
£
|
112
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
(1)
Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales on a same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.
|
(2)
|
Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales, including value added tax (“VAT”), net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise sales are repairs, warranty, insurance, employee and other miscellaneous sales.
|
Fourth Quarter Sales
In the fourth quarter, Signet’s same store sales were up 4.9%, compared to an increase of 4.2% in the prior year fourth quarter, and total sales increased by 5.1% to $2,392.6 million compared to $2,276.4 million in the prior year fourth quarter. Growth was led by diamond fashion jewelry such as Ever Us, diamond earrings, and diamond bracelets. Bridal sales also increased but at a lesser pace than fashion. eCommerce sales in the fourth quarter were $166.3 million and 7.0% of sales compared to $149.6 million and 6.6% of sales in the prior year fourth quarter. The breakdown of the sales performance is set out in the table below.
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016
|
Same
store sales (1) |
|
Non-same
store sales, net (2) |
|
Total sales at
constant exchange rate (3) |
|
Exchange
translation impact (3) |
|
Total
sales as reported |
|
Total
sales (in millions) |
|||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,452.5
|
|
|
Zale Jewelry
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
577.0
|
|
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
78.1
|
|
|
Zale division
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
655.1
|
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
282.6
|
|
|
Other
(4)
|
—
|
%
|
|
nm
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
nm
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
Signet
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,392.6
|
|
|
Adjusted Signet
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,397.8
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
(2)
Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(3)
Non-GAAP measure, see Item 6.
(4)
Includes sales from Signet’s diamond sourcing initiative.
nm Not meaningful.
Sterling Jewelers sales
In the fourth quarter, the Sterling Jewelers division’s total sales were $1,452.5 million compared to $1,358.3 million in the prior year fourth quarter, up 6.9% and same store sales increased 5.0%, compared to an increase of 3.7% in the prior year fourth quarter. Sales increases in the fourth quarter were driven by a combination of factors described below which drove results across our Kay and Jared brands. Sterling Jewelers’ average merchandise transaction value increased 6.0% and the number of transactions decreased 2.3%. This was driven principally by strong sales of diamond fashion jewelry and select bridal brands. This was the case at Kay in addition to Sterling Jewelers overall. Jared average merchandise transaction value decreased 3.4% and number of transactions increased 3.5% due to higher sales concentration of lower average merchandise transaction value in diamond fashion assortments. Additionally, several qualitative factors supported overall favorable results across the Sterling Jewelers division including, but not limited to, sales team execution, marketing and credit.
62
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016
|
Same
store sales (1) |
|
Non-same
store sales, net (2) |
|
Total
sales as reported |
|
Total
sales (in millions) |
|||||
|
Kay
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
940.8
|
|
|
Jared
(3)
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
439.5
|
|
|
Regional brands
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
|
(7.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
72.2
|
|
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,452.5
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes all sales from stores not open or owned for 12 months.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes smaller concept Jared stores such as Jared Vault and Jared Jewelry Boutique.
|
|
|
Average Merchandise Transaction Value
(1)(2)
|
|
Merchandise Transactions
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Average Value
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
Change from previous year
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|||||||||
|
Kay
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
|
Jared
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)%
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
Regional brands
|
$
|
392
|
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
(8.9
|
)%
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
(1)
Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales on a same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.
|
(2)
|
Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales, net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise sales are sales tax in the US, repairs, warranty, insurance, employee and other miscellaneous sales.
|
Zale sales
In the fourth quarter, the Zale division’s total sales were $655.1 million compared to $636.7 million in the prior year fourth quarter, up 2.9% and same store sales increased 4.7%, compared to an increase of 1.5% in the prior year fourth quarter. Zale Jewelry contributed $577.0 million and Piercing Pagoda contributed $78.1 million of revenues, an increase of 2.2% and 8.3%, respectively. Total Zale division sales included purchase accounting adjustments of $(5.2) million and $(12.8) million related to a reduction of deferred revenue associated with extended warranty sales in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively.
In the Zale Jewelry segment, average merchandise transaction value increased 6.2%, while the number of transactions decreased 2.1%. This was driven principally by strong sales of diamond fashion jewelry and bridal. In the Piercing Pagoda segment, average merchandise transaction value increased 10.0%, while the number of transactions decreased 2.7%. This was driven principally by strong sales of gold and diamond jewelry.
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016
|
Same store sales
(1)
|
|
Non-same
store sales, net (2) |
|
Total sales at
constant exchange
rate
(3)
|
|
Exchange
translation impact (3) |
|
Total sales
as reported |
|
Total sales
(in millions) |
|||||||
|
Zales
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
461.2
|
|
|
Gordon’s
|
(7.5
|
)%
|
|
(8.1
|
)%
|
|
(15.6
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
(15.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
27.1
|
|
|
Zale US Jewelry
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
488.3
|
|
|
Peoples
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
(15.6
|
)%
|
|
(14.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
77.0
|
|
|
Mappins
|
(7.6
|
)%
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
(10.0
|
)%
|
|
(14.0
|
)%
|
|
(24.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
11.7
|
|
|
Zale Canada Jewelry
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
|
(15.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
88.7
|
|
|
Total Zale Jewelry
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
577.0
|
|
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
78.1
|
|
|
Zale division
(4)
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
655.1
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
(2)
Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(3)
Non-GAAP measure.
(4)
The Zale division same store sales includes merchandise and repair sales and excludes warranty and insurance revenues.
63
|
|
Average Merchandise Transaction Value
(1)(2)
|
|
Merchandise Transactions
|
||||||||||
|
|
Average Value
|
|
Change from
previous year
|
|
Change from
previous year
|
||||||||
|
Fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||||
|
Zales
|
$
|
418
|
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
Gordon’s
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
(7.9
|
)%
|
|
Peoples
(3)
|
$
|
344
|
|
|
$
|
323
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
(6.7
|
)%
|
|
Mappins
(3)
|
$
|
292
|
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
(7.3
|
)%
|
|
Total Zale Jewelry
|
$
|
376
|
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
Zale division
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
(1)
Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales on a same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.
|
(2)
|
Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise sales are repairs, warranty, insurance, employee and other miscellaneous sales.
|
|
(3)
|
Amounts for Zale Canada Jewelry stores are denominated in Canadian dollars.
|
UK Jewelry sales
In the fourth quarter, the UK Jewelry division’s total sales were up by 1.7% to $282.6 million compared to $278.0 million in the prior year fourth quarter and up 5.9% at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). Same store sales increased 4.7% compared to an increase of 7.5% in the prior year fourth quarter. Average merchandise transaction value increased 3.7% and the number of transactions increased 1.1%. This was driven principally by strong sales of diamond jewelry and prestige watches in Ernest Jones.
Average merchandise transaction value and the number of transactions increased in H.Samuel 1.4% and 2.0%, respectively, due to strong sales of bridal, beads, and select watches. At Ernest Jones, average merchandise transaction value increased 9.1% and the number of transactions decreased 2.1% due to shift of merchandise mix toward diamond jewelry.
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016
|
Same
store sales (1) |
|
Non-same
store sales, net (2) |
|
Total sales at
constant exchange rate (3) |
|
Exchange
translation impact (3) |
|
Total
sales as reported |
|
Total
sales (in millions) |
|||||||
|
H.Samuel
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
151.2
|
|
|
Ernest Jones
(4)
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
131.4
|
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
282.6
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
|
(2)
Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(3)
Non-GAAP measure, see Item 6.
(4)
Includes stores selling under the Leslie Davis nameplate.
|
|
Average Merchandise Transaction Value
(1)(2)
|
|
Merchandise Transactions
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Average Value
|
|
Change from previous year
|
|
Change from previous year
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||||
|
H.Samuel
|
£
|
75
|
|
|
£
|
74
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
Ernest Jones
(3)
|
£
|
251
|
|
|
£
|
230
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
UK Jewelry division
|
£
|
111
|
|
|
£
|
107
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
(1)
Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales on a same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.
|
(2)
|
Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales, including value added tax (“VAT”), net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise sales are repairs, warranty, insurance, employee and other miscellaneous sales.
|
(3)
Includes stores selling under the Leslie Davis nameplate.
64
Cost of Sales and Gross Margin
In Fiscal 2016, gross margin was $2,440.4 million or 37.3% of sales compared to $2,074.2 million or 36.2% of sales in Fiscal 2015. Adjusted gross margin was $2,476.0 million or 37.6% of adjusted sales compared to 36.9% in the prior year (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). The increase in the adjusted gross margin rate from prior year of 70 basis points was due to improved merchandise margin from commodity costs and synergies, as well as store occupancy cost leverage.
|
•
|
The Sterling Jewelers division gross margin dollars increased $107.7 million compared to Fiscal 2015, reflecting increased sales and a gross margin rate improvement of 50 basis points. The gross margin rate expansion was driven by an improvement in the merchandise margin due to favorable commodity costs and store occupancy cost leverage.
|
|
•
|
In the Zale division, gross margin dollars increased $255.6 million compared to Fiscal 2015. Included in gross margin were purchasing accounting adjustments totaling $35.6 million in Fiscal 2016 and $57.3 million in the prior year. Adjusted gross margin dollars increased $233.9 million compared to the prior year (prior year represents a partial year of ownership due to the acquisition date of May 29, 2014), reflecting an adjusted gross margin rate improvement of 170 basis points. Higher sales and synergies favorably affected merchandise margins, distribution costs, and store occupancy. This included initiatives focused on discount controls, vendor terms and allowances, supply chain cost efficiencies and rent savings.
|
|
•
|
In the UK Jewelry division, gross margin dollars increased $3.9 million compared to Fiscal 2015, reflecting gross margin rate improvement of 80 basis points. The increases in dollars and rate were driven principally by leverage on store occupancy.
|
In the fourth quarter, the consolidated gross margin was $1,016.0 million or 42.5% of sales compared to $912.1 million or 40.1% of sales in the prior year fourth quarter. Adjusted gross margin was $1,020.7 million or 42.6% of adjusted sales compared to 40.9% in the prior year fourth quarter (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). The increase in the adjusted gross margin rate from prior year of 170 basis points was consistent with the full year, due primarily to gross margin synergies including sourcing and discount controls related mostly to the Zale division, as well as favorable commodity and leverage on store occupancy costs.
|
•
|
Gross margin dollars in the Sterling Jewelers division increased $57.4 million compared to the prior year fourth quarter, reflecting higher sales and a gross margin rate increase of 120 basis points. The gross margin rate expansion was driven by an improvement in the merchandise margin due primarily to favorable commodity costs and store occupancy cost leverage.
|
|
•
|
In the Zale division, gross margin dollars increased $41.8 million compared to prior year fourth quarter. Included in gross margin were purchase accounting adjustments totaling $4.7 million in current year fourth quarter compared to $24.8 million in prior year. Adjusted gross margin dollars in the Zale division increased $21.7 million compared to the prior year fourth quarter. The adjusted gross margin rate increased 270 basis points, as synergies favorably affected merchandise margins, distribution costs and store occupancy.
|
|
•
|
In the UK Jewelry division, gross margin dollars increased $4.0 million compared to Fiscal 2015, reflecting a gross margin rate improvement of 80 basis points. The increases in dollars and rate were driven principally by leverage on store occupancy.
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for Fiscal 2016 were $1,987.6 million or 30.4% of sales compared to $1,712.9 million or 29.9% of sales in Fiscal 2015, up $274.7 million, which includes a full year of Zale SGA expense, compared to the partial year reported in the prior period due to the timing of the acquisition. In addition, included in SGA were favorable purchase accounting adjustments of $9.2 million offset by transaction and integration costs of $78.9 million, which includes the impact of the legal settlement of $34.2 million over appraisal rights, consulting and internal costs incurred in connection with the integration of Zale acquisition, severance costs and implementation costs incurred in connection with our IT modernization and standardization initiatives. Adjusted SGA was $1,917.9 million or 29.1% of adjusted sales compared to 28.8% in the prior year (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). The increase in dollars and rate was driven primarily by central costs around product research and development, as well as incremental investments in advertising, IT support and employee benefits.
In the fourth quarter, SGA expense was $686.6 million or 28.7% of sales compared to $634.5 million or 27.9% of sales in the prior year fourth quarter. In addition, included in SGA were purchase accounting adjustments of $1.5 million and transaction and integration costs of $19.1 million, which includes consulting costs incurred in connection with the integration of Zale acquisition, severance costs and implementation costs associated with our IT modernization and standardization initiatives. Adjusted SGA was $666.0 million or 27.8% of adjusted sales compared to 27.5% in the prior year (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). The 30 basis point increase in SGA rate was driven primarily by an increase in central costs associated with higher information technology recurring expense, product research and development, and harmonization of employee compensation among North America divisions. Partially offsetting these higher central costs was leverage on advertising and store payroll.
Other Operating Income, Net
In Fiscal 2016, other operating income was $250.9 million or 3.8% of sales compared to $215.3 million or 3.7% of sales in Fiscal 2015. This increase was primarily due to higher interest income earned from higher outstanding receivable balances.
Other operating income in the fourth quarter was $63.7 million or 2.6% of sales compared to $54.1 million or 2.4% of sales in the prior year fourth quarter. This increase was also primarily due to higher interest income earned from higher outstanding receivable balances.
65
Operating Income
In Fiscal 2016, operating income was $703.7 million or 10.7% of sales compared to $576.6 million or 10.0% of sales in Fiscal 2015. Included in operating income were purchase accounting adjustments of $26.4 million and transaction and integration costs of $78.9 million. Adjusted operating income was $809.0 million or 12.3% of adjusted sales compared to 11.8% in the prior year (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6).
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
$
|
|
% of sales
|
|
$
|
|
% of sales
|
||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
$
|
718.6
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
624.3
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
Zale division
(1)
|
52.1
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
||
|
UK Jewelry division
|
61.5
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
52.2
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
||
|
Other
(2)
|
(128.5
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
|
(91.7
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
||
|
Operating income
|
$
|
703.7
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
576.6
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Zale division includes net operating loss impact of $26.4 million for purchase accounting adjustments. Excluding the impact from accounting adjustments, Zale division’s operating income was $78.5 million or 4.3% of sales. The Zale division operating income included $44.3 million from Zale Jewelry or 2.8% of sales and $7.8 million from Piercing Pagoda or 3.2% of sales. In the prior year, Zale division includes net operating loss impact of $45.9 million for purchase accounting adjustments. Excluding the impact from accounting adjustments, Zale division’s operating income was $37.7 million or 3.0% of sales. The Zale division operating loss included $1.9 million from Zale Jewelry or (0.2)% of sales and $6.3 million from Piercing Pagoda or (4.3)% of sales.
|
|
(2)
|
Other includes $78.9 million and $59.8 million of transaction and integration expenses in Fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. Transaction and integration costs include legal settlement of $34.2 million over appraisal rights, and expenses associated with legal, tax, accounting, information technology implementation, consulting and severance.
|
|
nm
|
Not meaningful.
|
In the fourth quarter, operating income was $393.1 million or 16.4% of sales compared to $331.7 million or 14.6% of sales in prior year fourth quarter. Included in operating income were purchase accounting adjustments of $6.2 million and transaction and integration costs of $19.1 million. Adjusted operating income was $418.4 million or 17.4% of adjusted sales compared to 15.8% in the prior year (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6).
|
|
Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2015
|
||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
$
|
|
% of sales
|
|
$
|
|
% of sales
|
||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers division
|
$
|
305.4
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
260.0
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
Zale division
(1)
|
63.0
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
36.1
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
||
|
UK Jewelry division
|
57.8
|
|
|
20.5
|
%
|
|
53.8
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
||
|
Other
(2)
|
(33.1
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
|
(18.2
|
)
|
|
nm
|
|
||
|
Operating income
|
$
|
393.1
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
331.7
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Zale division includes net operating loss impact of $6.2 million for purchase accounting adjustments. Excluding the impact from accounting adjustments, Zale division’s operating income was $69.2 million or 10.6% of sales. The Zale division operating income included $54.2 million from Zale Jewelry or 9.4% of sales and $8.8 million from Piercing Pagoda or 11.3% of sales. In the prior year fourth quarter, Zale division includes net operating loss impact of $20.8 million for purchase accounting adjustments. Excluding the impact from accounting adjustments, Zale division’s operating income was $56.9 million or 8.7% of sales. The Zale division operating income included $32.8 million from Zale Jewelry or 5.8% of sales and $3.3 million from Piercing Pagoda or 4.6% of sales.
|
|
(2)
|
Other includes $19.1 million and $9.2 million of transaction and integration expenses in Fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. Transaction and integration costs include expenses associated with legal, tax, information technology implementation, consulting and severance.
|
|
nm
|
Not meaningful.
|
Interest Expense, Net
In Fiscal 2016, net interest expense was $45.9 million compared to $36.0 million in Fiscal 2015. The increase in interest expense was driven by the addition of $1.4 billion of debt financing at a weighted average interest rate of 2.6% related to the Zale acquisition, which was outstanding for the full 12 months of Fiscal 2016, versus only a partial year in the prior period.
In the fourth quarter, net interest expense was $12.1 million compared to $7.9 million in the prior year fourth quarter driven by the timing of repayments of our fourth quarter borrowings under our variable rate revolving credit facility, coupled with slightly higher interest rates. Further contributing to the increase was additional expense related to our interest rate hedging instrument which effectively converted a portion of variable-rate debt into fixed-rate debt during the first quarter of Fiscal 2016.
Income Before Income Taxes
For Fiscal 2016, income before income taxes was up 21.7% to $657.8 million or 10.0% of sales compared to $540.6 million or 9.4% of sales in Fiscal 2015.
For the fourth quarter, income before income taxes was up 17.7% to $381.0 million or 15.9% of sales compared to $323.8 million or 14.2% of sales in the prior year fourth quarter.
66
Income Taxes
Income tax expense for Fiscal 2016 was $189.9 million compared to $159.3 million in Fiscal 2015, with an effective tax rate of 28.9% for Fiscal 2016 compared to 29.5% in Fiscal 2015. This reduction of 60 basis points in Signet’s effective tax rate primarily reflects the full year benefit of Signet’s amended capital structure and financing arrangements utilized to fund the acquisition of Zale Corporation.
In the fourth quarter, income tax expense was $109.1 million compared to $95.8 million in the prior year fourth quarter. The fourth quarter effective tax rate was 28.6% compared to 29.6% in the prior year fourth quarter also driven principally by income mix by jurisdiction and increased effect of Signet’s global financing arrangements.
Net Income
Net income for Fiscal 2016 was up 22.7% to $467.9 million or 7.1% of sales compared to $381.3 million or 6.6% of sales in Fiscal 2015.
For the fourth quarter, net income was up 19.3% to $271.9 million or 11.4% of sales compared to $228.0 million or 10.0% of sales in the prior year fourth quarter.
Earnings Per Share
For Fiscal 2016, diluted earnings per share were $5.87 compared to $4.75 in Fiscal 2015, an increase of 23.6%. Adjusted diluted earnings per share were $6.86 compared to $5.63 in the prior year (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). The weighted average diluted number of common shares outstanding was 79.7 million compared to 80.2 million in Fiscal 2015. Signet repurchased 1,018,568 shares in Fiscal 2016 compared to 288,393 shares in Fiscal 2015.
For the fourth quarter, diluted earnings per share were $3.42 compared to $2.84 in the prior year fourth quarter, up 20.4%. Adjusted diluted earnings per share were $3.63 compared to $3.06 in the prior year fourth quarter (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6). The weighted average diluted number of common shares outstanding was 79.4 million compared to 80.2 million in the prior year fourth quarter.
Dividends Per Share
In Fiscal 2016, dividends of $0.88 were approved by the Board of Directors compared to $0.72 in Fiscal 2015.
67
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Summary Cash Flow
The following table provides a summary of Signet’s cash flow activity for
Fiscal 2017
,
Fiscal 2016
and
Fiscal 2015
:
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
678.3
|
|
|
$
|
443.3
|
|
|
$
|
283.0
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(278.4
|
)
|
|
(228.7
|
)
|
|
(1,652.6
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(438.2
|
)
|
|
(266.6
|
)
|
|
1,320.9
|
|
|||
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(38.3
|
)
|
|
(52.0
|
)
|
|
(48.7
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
137.7
|
|
|
193.6
|
|
|
247.6
|
|
|||
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(38.3
|
)
|
|
(52.0
|
)
|
|
(48.7
|
)
|
|||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
98.7
|
|
|
$
|
137.7
|
|
|
$
|
193.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Free cash flow
(1)
|
$
|
400.3
|
|
|
$
|
216.8
|
|
|
$
|
62.8
|
|
|
(1)
|
Non-GAAP measure. See Item 6 for additional information.
|
OVERVIEW
Operating activities provide the primary source of cash and are influenced by a number of factors, such as:
|
•
|
net income;
|
|
•
|
changes in the level of inventory as a result of sales and new store growth;
|
|
•
|
changes to accounts receivable driven by the in-house customer finance program metrics including average monthly collection rate and the mix of finance offer participation;
|
|
•
|
changes to accrued expenses including variable compensation; and
|
|
•
|
deferred revenue, reflective of the performance of extended service plan sales.
|
Other sources of cash include borrowings, issuance of common and preferred shares for cash and proceeds from the securitization facility relating to Signet’s Sterling Jewelers finance receivables.
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
Signet derives most of its operating cash from net income through the sale of jewelry. As a retail business, Signet receives cash when it makes a sale to a customer or when the payment has been processed by Signet or the relevant bank if the payment is made by third-party credit or debit card. Partially offsetting cash receipts via sales are payments of operating expenses. Signet’s largest operating expenses are cost of inventory along with payroll and payroll-related benefits.
Working Capital
Changes to accounts receivable are driven by the Sterling Jewelers division in-house credit program. If a customer makes use of financing provided by the Sterling Jewelers division, the cash is received over time based on terms of the agreement. In
Fiscal 2017
,
62.0%
of the Sterling Jewelers division’s sales were made using customer financing provided by Signet, as compared to
61.5%
in
Fiscal 2016
. The average monthly collection rate from the Sterling Jewelers customer in-house finance receivables was
11.0%
as compared to
11.5%
in
Fiscal 2016
. Changes in credit participation and the collection rate impact the level of receivables.
Changes to accounts payable are primarily driven by the timing and amount of merchandise purchased, the mix of merchandise purchased and the relevant payment terms. Signet typically pays for merchandise within 30 days of receipt. Due to the nature of specialty retail jewelry, it is usual for inventory to turnover on average once approximately every 12 months.
Signet’s working capital requirements fluctuate during the year as a result of the seasonal nature of sales, and movements in the British pound and Canadian dollar to US dollar exchange rate. The working capital needs of the business normally decline from January to August, as inventory and accounts receivable decrease from seasonal peaks. As inventory is purchased for the fourth quarter, there is a working capital outflow which reaches its highest levels in mid- to late-November. The peak level of working capital is typically $100 million to $150 million above the typical January to August level, and can be accentuated by new store openings. The working capital position then reverses over the Holiday Season.
68
The change in inventory is primarily driven by the sales performance of the existing stores, the net change in store space and the seasonal pattern of sales. Other factors which drive changes to inventory include changes in sourcing practices, commodity costs, foreign exchange and merchandise mix. To further enhance product selection, test new jewelry designs and working capital levels, Signet enters into consignment arrangements for merchandise. The majority of inventory held on consignment is in the US, which at
January 28, 2017
amounted to
$574.0 million
as compared to
$441.9 million
at
January 30, 2016
. The principal terms of the consignment agreements, which can generally be terminated by either party, are such that Signet can return any or all of the inventory to the relevant supplier without financial or commercial penalties. When Signet sells consignment inventory, it becomes liable to the supplier for the cost of the item. The sale of any such inventory is accounted for on a gross basis (see principal accounting policies, Item 8).
Signet’s working capital is also impacted by movements in deferred revenue associated with the sales of extended service plans sold in Sterling Jewelers and Zale divisions. Movements in deferred revenue reflect the level of divisional sales and the attachment rate of service plan sales. Therefore if sales increase, working capital would be expected to increase. Similarly, a decrease in sales would be expected to result in a reduction in working capital.
Signet’s largest class of operating expense relates to store and central payroll and benefits. These are typically paid on a weekly, biweekly or monthly basis, with annual bonus payments also being made. Operating lease payments in respect of stores occupied are normally paid on a monthly basis by the Sterling Jewelers and Zale divisions and on a quarterly basis by the UK Jewelry division. Payment for advertising on television, radio or in print is usually made between 30 and 60 days after the advertisement appears. Other expenses, none of which are material, have various payment terms.
Investment in new space requires significant investment in working capital, as well as fixed capital investment, due to the inventory turn, and the additional investment required to fund sales in the Sterling Jewelers and Zale divisions utilizing in-house customer finance. Of the total investment required to open a new store in the US, between 50% and 60% is typically accounted for by working capital. New stores are usually opened in the third quarter or early in the fourth quarter of a fiscal year. A reduction in the number of store openings results in the difference between the level of funding required in the first half of a fiscal year and the peak level being lower, while an increase in the number of store openings would have the opposite impact.
Fiscal 2017 Cash Flow Results
In
Fiscal 2017
, net cash provided by operating activities was
$678.3 million
as compared to
$443.3 million
in
Fiscal 2016
. The increase of
$235.0 million
is attributable to a
$75.3 million
increase in net income, a $22.5 million increase in depreciation and amortization (including amortization of unfavorable intangible liabilities) related to the elevated level of capital expenditures since the acquisition of Zale in Fiscal 2014 and the following cash flows associated with changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
•
|
Cash used for accounts receivable was
$102.7 million
compared to
$189.8 million
in
Fiscal 2016
, reflecting an increase in the underlying accounts receivable as a result of the
50
basis point decline in the collection rate from customers. The collection rate decline is due principally to a continuation of the shift in credit plan mix towards plans requiring lower monthly payments and an increase in the average transaction value. Our receivable portfolio has experienced growth compared to the prior year end, however, this growth trajectory has flattened in recent periods. Credit applications compared to the prior year end are down by approximately 10% which is driven by declines in retail traffic, primarily mall traffic which has has lowered the number of active credit accounts compared to the prior year end by approximately 23,000, or 1.5%. Slowed growth in the receivable portfolio has also contributed to a higher rate of charge-offs as a percentage of average gross accounts receivable of 10.7% in the current year compared to 9.9% in the prior year. As accounts are charged-off that were originated in periods of high portfolio growth during a period of slower portfolio growth, this ratio will increase.
|
|
•
|
Cash used for inventory and inventory-related items was
$9.7 million
compared to
$46.0 million
in
Fiscal 2016
. The change in inventory cash flows is attributed to the change in total inventory on-hand to
$2,449.3 million
in
Fiscal 2017
compared to
$2,453.9 million
in
Fiscal 2016
. Key factors impacting the decrease in total inventory were sound inventory management and the effect of foreign exchange, offset by increases associated with new store growth and higher commodity prices.
|
|
•
|
Cash used for other receivables and other assets was
$6.9 million
compared to
$70.6 million
in
Fiscal 2016
primarily due to an increase in deferred extended service plan selling costs.
|
|
•
|
Cash used for accrued expenses and other liabilities was
$21.8 million
in
Fiscal 2017
compared to
$51.8 million
of cash in-flows in
Fiscal 2016
primarily due to a decrease in payroll-related accrued expenses, including short-term and long-term incentive compensation.
|
|
•
|
Cash provided by deferred revenue was
$43.6 million
in
Fiscal 2017
compared to
$76.3 million
in
Fiscal 2016
. The increase in deferred revenue was primarily driven by higher extended service plan sales in the Sterling Jewelers and Zale divisions.
|
|
•
|
Cash provided by income taxes was
$38.9 million
compared to
$25.7 million
of cash outflows in
Fiscal 2016
due to lower estimated tax payments made in
Fiscal 2017
as a result of lower taxable income and Signet’s lower effective tax rate.
|
69
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities primarily reflects the purchases of property, plant and equipment related to the:
|
•
|
rate of space expansion in the US;
|
|
•
|
investment in existing stores, reflecting the level of investment in sales-enhancing technology, and the number of store remodels and relocations carried out; and
|
|
•
|
investments in IT modernization and digital ecosystem.
|
When evaluating new store investment, management uses an investment hurdle rate of a 20% internal rate of return on a pre-tax basis over a five year period, assuming the release of working capital at the end of the five years. Capital expenditure accounts for about 45% of the investment in a new store in the Sterling Jewelers division. The balance is accounted for by investment in inventory and the funding of customer financing. Signet typically carries out a remodel of its stores every 10 years but does have some discretion as to the timing of such expenditure. A remodel is evaluated using the same investment procedures as for a new store. Minor store refurbishments are typically carried out every five years. In addition to store remodels, Signet carries out minor store refurbishments where stores are profitable but do not satisfy the investment hurdle rate required for a full remodel; this is usually associated with a short term lease renewal. Where possible, the investment appraisal approach is also used to evaluate other investment opportunities.
In
Fiscal 2017
, net cash
used in
investing activities was
$278.4 million
, compared to
$228.7 million
in
Fiscal 2016
and
$1,652.6 million
in
Fiscal 2015
. Excluding the acquisition of Zale in Fiscal 2015, cash used in investing activities was
$223.4 million
. The overall increase in capital additions was primarily due to new stores and investments in eCommerce and modernization of legacy IT systems in all divisions. In
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, capital expenditures in each division exceeded depreciation and amortization recognized. See table below for additional information regarding capital additions.
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Capital additions in Sterling Jewelers
|
$
|
154.5
|
|
|
$
|
141.6
|
|
|
$
|
157.6
|
|
|
Capital additions in Zale division
|
97.7
|
|
|
57.9
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
|||
|
Capital additions in UK Jewelry
|
25.7
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|||
|
Capital additions in Other
|
0.1
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|||
|
Total purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
$
|
278.0
|
|
|
$
|
226.5
|
|
|
$
|
220.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Ratio of capital additions to depreciation and amortization in Sterling Jewelers
|
137.1
|
%
|
|
133.3
|
%
|
|
164.7
|
%
|
|||
|
Ratio of capital additions to depreciation and amortization in Zale division
|
181.9
|
%
|
|
120.4
|
%
|
|
135.5
|
%
|
|||
|
Ratio of capital additions to depreciation and amortization in UK Jewelry
|
119.0
|
%
|
|
131.3
|
%
|
|
91.4
|
%
|
|||
|
Ratio of capital additions to depreciation and amortization for Signet
|
147.2
|
%
|
|
129.2
|
%
|
|
147.1
|
%
|
|||
Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6) is defined as net cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property, plant and equipment. Free cash flow in
Fiscal 2017
was
$400.3 million
compared to
$216.8 million
and
$62.8 million
in
Fiscal 2016
and
Fiscal 2015
, respectively. The increase in free cash flow in
Fiscal 2017
compared to
Fiscal 2016
was primarily due to growth in profitability and working capital management, primarily through improvements in inventory planning.
Cash Provided By/Used in Financing Activities
The major items within financing activities are discussed below:
Proceeds from issuance of equity shares
On
October 5, 2016
, the Company issued
625,000
preferred shares to Green Equity Investors VI, L.P., Green Equity Investors Side VI, L.P., LGP Associates VI-A LLC and LGP Associates VI-B LLC, all affiliates of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P., (together, the “Investors”) for an aggregate purchase price of
$625.0 million
, or
$1,000
per share (the “Stated Value”) pursuant to the investment agreement dated August 24, 2016. In connection with the issuance of the preferred shares, the Company incurred direct and incremental expenses of
$13.7 million
, including financial advisory fees, closing costs, legal expenses and other offering-related expenses. The preferred shares rank senior to the Company’s common shares, with respect to dividend rights and rights on the distribution of assets on any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company. Preferred shareholders are entitled to a cumulative dividend at the rate of
5%
per annum, payable quarterly in arrears, commencing on February 15, 2017. See Note 5 of Item 8 for additional information related to preferred shareholder rights.
70
In addition,
$2.1 million
was received in
Fiscal 2017
from the issuance of common shares as compared to
$5.0 million
in
Fiscal 2016
. Other than equity based compensation awards granted to employees, Signet has not issued common shares as a financing activity for more than 10 years.
Dividends
Dividends on common shares
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
Cash dividend
per share |
|
Total
dividends |
|
Cash dividend
per share |
|
Total
dividends |
|
Cash dividend
per share |
|
Total
dividends |
||||||||||||
|
First quarter
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
14.4
|
|
|
Second quarter
|
0.26
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
||||||
|
Third quarter
|
0.26
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
||||||
|
Fourth quarter
|
0.26
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
(1)
|
0.22
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
(1)
|
0.18
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
75.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
70.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
57.7
|
|
|
(1)
|
Signet’s dividend policy results in the dividend payment date being a quarter in arrears from the declaration date. As a result, as of
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
,
$17.7 million
and
$17.5 million
, respectively, has been recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets reflecting the cash dividends declared for the fourth quarter of
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively.
|
In addition, on
March 9, 2017
, Signet’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of
$0.31
per share on its common shares. This dividend will be payable on
May 31, 2017
to shareholders of record on
April 28, 2017
, with an ex-dividend date of
April 26, 2017
.
Dividends on preferred shares
As of
January 28, 2017
, dividends on preferred shares totaling
$11.3 million
were declared and accrued for by the Company. This dividend is payable to preferred shareholders as of February 15, 2017. This amount, along with the impact of the deemed dividend for the accretion of issuance costs associated with the preferred shares, reduced net income attributable to common shareholders in
Fiscal 2017
. There were
no
cumulative undeclared dividends on the preferred shares as of
January 28, 2017
.
Restrictions on dividend payments
Signet has a senior unsecured multi-currency, multi-year revolving credit facility agreement (the “Credit Facility”) which provides the Company with a
$700 million
revolving credit facility and a
$357.5 million
term loan facility. This credit facility agreement permits the making of dividend payments and stock repurchases so long as the Parent Company (i) is not in default under the agreement, or (ii) if in default at the time of making such dividend repayment or stock repurchase, has no loans outstanding under the agreement or more than $10 million in letters of credit issued under the agreement.
Under Bermuda law, a company may not declare or pay dividends if there are reasonable grounds for believing that the company is, or would after the payment be, unable to pay its liabilities as they become due or that the realizable value of its assets would thereby be less than its liabilities.
Share repurchases
The Company’s share repurchase activity was as follows:
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions, expect per share amounts)
|
Amount
authorized |
|
Shares
repurchased |
|
Amount
repurchased |
|
Average
repurchase price per share |
|
Shares
repurchased |
|
Amount
repurchased |
|
Average
repurchase price per share |
|
Shares
repurchased |
|
Amount
repurchased |
|
Average
repurchase price per share |
|||||||||||||||||
|
2016 Program
(1)
|
$
|
1,375.0
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
$
|
864.4
|
|
|
$
|
86.40
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
||||
|
2013 Program
(2)
|
$
|
350.0
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
135.6
|
|
|
$
|
111.26
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
130.0
|
|
|
$
|
127.63
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
29.8
|
|
|
$
|
103.37
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,000.0
|
|
|
$
|
89.10
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
130.0
|
|
|
$
|
127.63
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
29.8
|
|
|
$
|
103.37
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
(1)
|
The 2016 Program had
$510.6 million
remaining as of
January 28, 2017
.
|
|
(2)
|
The 2013 Program was completed in May 2016.
|
|
n/a
|
Not applicable.
|
In February 2016, the Board authorized the repurchase of Signet’s common shares up to
$750.0 million
(the “2016 Program”). In August 2016, the Board increased its authorized share repurchase program by
$625.0 million
, bringing the total authorization for the 2016 Program to
$1,375.0 million
. The 2016 Program may be suspended or discontinued at any time without notice.
On October 5, 2016, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement (“ASR”) with a large financial institution to repurchase
$525.0 million
of the Company’s common shares. At inception, the Company paid
$525.0 million
to the financial institution and took delivery of
4.7 million
shares with an initial estimated cost of
$367.5 million
. In December 2016, the ASR was finalized and the Company received an additional
1.3 million
shares. Total shares repurchased under the ASR were
6.0 million
shares at an average purchase price of
$87.01
per share based on the volume-weighted average price of the Company’s common shares traded during the pricing period, less an agreed discount.
71
Movement in Cash and Indebtedness
Cash and cash equivalents at
January 28, 2017
were
$98.7 million
compared to
$137.7 million
as of
January 30, 2016
. Signet has significant amounts of cash and cash equivalents invested in various ‘AAA’ rated liquidity funds and at a number of financial institutions. The amount invested in each liquidity fund or at each financial institution takes into account the credit rating and size of the liquidity fund or financial institution and is invested for short-term durations.
At
January 28, 2017
, Signet had
$1,417.6 million
of outstanding debt, comprised of
$398.8 million
of senior unsecured notes,
$600.0 million
of an asset-backed securitization facility, a
$348.6 million
term loan facility,
$56.0 million
on the revolving credit facility and bank overdrafts totaling
$14.2 million
. The term loan requires the Company to make scheduled quarterly principal payments over the five-year term. During
Fiscal 2017
,
$16.4 million
in principal payments were made.
During the second quarter of Fiscal 2017, Signet amended and restated its Credit Facility agreement to (i) increase the borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility from $400 million to $700 million and extend the maturity date to July 2021 and (ii) extend the maturity date of the term loan facility to July 2021 and revise the scheduled quarterly principal repayments to align with the July 2021 maturity date. Additionally, Signet amended the note purchase agreement associated with the asset-backed securitization facility to extend the term of the facility by one year to May 2018 with remaining terms substantially consistent with the existing agreement.
The Company had stand-by letters of credit on the revolving credit facility of
$15.3 million
and
$28.8 million
as of
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
, respectively, that reduce remaining availability under the revolving credit facility.
Net debt (non-GAAP measure, see Item 6) was
$1,310.3 million
as of
January 28, 2017
compared to net debt of
$1,241.0 million
as of
January 30, 2016
.
Capital availability
Signet’s level of borrowings and cash balances fluctuates during the year reflecting the seasonality of its cash flow requirements and business performance. Management believes that cash balances and the committed borrowing facilities (including the Credit Facility described more fully in Note 20 of Item 8) currently available to the business are sufficient for both its present and near term requirements. The following table provides a summary of these items as of
January 28, 2017
,
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
:
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
|
January 31, 2015
|
||||||
|
Working capital
(1)
|
$
|
3,438.9
|
|
|
$
|
3,437.0
|
|
|
$
|
3,210.3
|
|
|
Capitalization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
1,317.9
|
|
|
1,321.0
|
|
|
1,354.3
|
|
|||
|
Series A redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
611.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Shareholder’s equity
|
2,490.2
|
|
|
3,060.7
|
|
|
2,810.4
|
|
|||
|
Total capitalization
|
$
|
4,420.0
|
|
|
$
|
4,381.7
|
|
|
$
|
4,164.7
|
|
|
Additional amounts available under credit agreements
|
$
|
628.7
|
|
|
$
|
371.2
|
|
|
$
|
374.6
|
|
|
(1)
|
Results reclassified in accordance with Signet’s adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2015-03, which requires debt issuance costs to be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability. See Note 2 of Item 8 for additional information.
|
In addition to cash generated from operating activities, during
Fiscal 2017
,
Fiscal 2016
and
Fiscal 2015
, Signet also had funds available from the credit facilities described above.
Signet’s Credit Facility contains various customary representations and warranties, financial reporting requirements and other affirmative and negative covenants. The Credit Facility requires that Signet maintain at all times a “Leverage Ratio” (as defined in the agreement) to be no greater than 2.50 to 1.00 and a “Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio” (as defined in the agreement) to be no less than 1.40 to 1.00, both determined as of the end of each fiscal quarter of Signet for the trailing twelve months.
Credit Rating
The following table provides Signet’s credit ratings as of
January 28, 2017
:
|
Rating Agency
|
Corporate
|
Senior Unsecured Notes
|
|
Standard & Poor’s
|
BBB-
|
BBB-
|
|
Moody’s
|
Baa3
|
Baa3
|
|
Fitch
|
BB+
|
BB+
|
72
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Merchandise held on consignment
Signet held
$574.0 million
of consignment inventory which is not recorded on the balance sheet at
January 28, 2017
, as compared to
$441.9 million
at
January 30, 2016
. The principal terms of the consignment agreements, which can generally be terminated by either party, are such that Signet can return any, or all of, the inventory to the relevant supplier without financial or commercial penalty.
Contingent property liabilities
At
January 28, 2017
, approximately
26
UK Jewelry property leases had been assigned by Signet to third parties (and remained unexpired and occupied by assignees at that date) and approximately
12
additional properties were sub-let at that date. Should the assignees or sub-tenants fail to fulfill any obligations in respect of those leases or any other leases which have at any other time been assigned or sub-let, Signet or one of its UK subsidiaries may be liable for those defaults. The number of such claims arising to date has been small, and the liability, which is charged to the income statement as it arises, has not been material.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
A summary of operating lease obligations is set out below. These primarily relate to minimum payments due under store lease arrangements. The majority of the store operating leases provide for the payment of base rentals plus real estate taxes, insurance, common area maintenance fees and merchant association dues. Additional information regarding Signet’s operating leases is available in Item 2 and Note
25
included in Item 8.
Long-term debt obligations comprise borrowings with an original maturity of greater than one year. It is expected that operating commitments will be funded from future operating cash flows and no additional facilities will be required to meet these obligations.
Contractual obligations as of
January 28, 2017
|
(in millions)
|
Less than
one year |
|
Between one and
three years |
|
Between three
and five years |
|
More than
five years |
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Long-term debt obligations - Principal
(1)
|
$
|
22.4
|
|
|
$
|
671.5
|
|
|
$
|
310.7
|
|
|
$
|
400.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,404.6
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations - Interest
(2)
|
40.9
|
|
|
63.0
|
|
|
45.9
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
196.8
|
|
|||||
|
Operating lease obligations
(3)
|
450.0
|
|
|
700.4
|
|
|
566.8
|
|
|
901.1
|
|
|
2,618.3
|
|
|||||
|
Capital commitments
|
48.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
48.4
|
|
|||||
|
Pensions
|
3.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|||||
|
Commitment fee payments
|
1.3
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|||||
|
Deferred compensation plan
|
3.0
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|||||
|
Current income tax
|
101.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
101.8
|
|
|||||
|
Other long-term liabilities
(4)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
671.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,444.5
|
|
|
$
|
935.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,376.9
|
|
|
$
|
4,428.3
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes principal payments on all long-term debt obligations.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes future interest payments on all long-term debt obligations, inclusive of both fixed- and variable-rate debt. Projected interest costs on variable rate debt were calculated using rates in effect at
January 28, 2017
. Amounts exclude the amortization of debt discounts, the amortization of loan fees and fees for lines of credit that would be included in interest expense in the consolidated income statements.
|
|
(3)
|
Operating lease obligations relate to minimum payments due under store lease arrangements. Most store operating leases require payment of real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance fees. Real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance fees were approximately 30% of base rentals for
Fiscal 2017
. These are not included in the table above. Some operating leases also require additional payments based on a percentage of sales.
|
|
(4)
|
Other long-term liabilities reflect loss reserves related to credit insurance services provided by insurance subsidiaries. We have reflected these payments under “Other,” as the timing of the future payments is dependent on the actual processing of the claims.
|
Not included in the table above are obligations under employment agreements and ordinary course purchase orders for merchandise.
IMPACT OF INFLATION
The impact of inflation on Signet’s results for the past three years has not been significant apart from the impact of the commodity costs changes, and in the UK, the impact on merchandise costs due to the currency translation of the British pound against the US dollar.
73
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Critical accounting policies covering areas of greater complexity that are subject to the exercise of judgment due to the reliance on key estimates are listed below. A comprehensive listing of Signet’s critical accounting policies is set forth in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8.
Revenue recognition for extended service plans and lifetime warranty agreements (“ESP”)
The Company recognizes revenue related to lifetime warranty sales in proportion to when the expected costs will be incurred. The deferral period for lifetime warranty sales in each division is determined from patterns of claims costs, including estimates of future claims costs expected to be incurred. Management reviews the trends in claims to assess whether changes are required to the revenue and cost recognition rates utilized. A significant change in estimates related to the time period or pattern in which warranty-related costs are expected to be incurred could materially impact revenues. The deferral period and recognition rates of deferred revenue related to lifetime warranty sales is determined based on multi-year patterns of claims costs; therefore, a shift in historical experience of claims cost and frequency over several periods would be required to alter the revenue recognition pattern materially. All direct costs associated with the sale of these plans are deferred and amortized in proportion to the revenue recognized.
The Sterling Jewelers division sells ESP, subject to certain conditions, to perform repair work over the life of the product. Revenue from the sale of the lifetime ESP is recognized consistent with the estimated pattern of claim costs expected to be incurred by the Company in connection with performing under the ESP obligations. Based on an evaluation of historical claims data, management currently estimates that substantially all claims will be incurred within
17
years of the sale of the warranty contract.
In the second quarter of Fiscal 2016, an operational change related to the Sterling Jewelers division’s ESP associated with ring sizing was made to further align Zale and Sterling ESP policies. As a result, revenue from the sale of these lifetime ESP in the Sterling Jewelers division is deferred and recognized over
17
years for all plans, with approximately
57%
of revenue recognized within the first
two
years for plans sold on or after May 2, 2015
(
January 30, 2016
:
57%
) and
42%
of revenue recognized within the first two years for plans sold prior to May 2, 2015
(
January 30, 2016
:
42%
;
January 31, 2015
:
45%
).
The Zale division also sells ESP. Zale Jewelry customers are offered lifetime warranties on certain products that cover sizing and breakage with an option to purchase theft protection for a two-year period. Revenue from the sale of lifetime ESP is deferred and recognized over 10 years, with approximately
69%
of revenue recognized within the first two years (
January 30, 2016
:
69%
;
January 31, 2015
:
69%
).
Deferred revenue related to extended service plans, voucher promotions and other items at the end of
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
was
$935.9 million
and
$889.4 million
, respectively.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Potentially impaired assets or asset groups are identified by reviewing the cash flows of individual stores. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, based on the Company’s internal business plans. If the undiscounted cash flow is less than the asset’s carrying amount, the impairment charge recognized is determined by estimating the fair value of the assets and recording a loss for the amount that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value. The Company utilizes historical experience, internal business plans and an appropriate discount rate to estimate the fair value. Property and equipment at stores planned for closure are depreciated over a revised estimate of their useful lives.
In
Fiscal 2017
, the income statement includes a charge of
$1.3 million
for impairment of assets as compared to
$0.7 million
in
Fiscal 2016
.
Property, plant and equipment, net
, totaled
$822.9 million
as of
January 28, 2017
and
$727.6 million
as of
January 30, 2016
. Depreciation and amortization expense for
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
was
$175.0 million
and
$161.4 million
, respectively. Application of alternative assumptions, such as changes in estimates of future cash flows, could produce significantly different results. A 10% decrease in the estimated undiscounted cash flows for the stores with indicators of impairment would not have had a material impact on the Company’s results of operations in
Fiscal 2017
.
Goodwill and intangibles
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually and more frequently if indicators of impairment arise. In evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value (including goodwill). If the Company concludes that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, then no further testing is required. However, if the Company concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, then the two-step goodwill impairment test is performed to identify a potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of impairment to be recognized, if any. The two-step impairment test involves estimating the fair value of all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including the implied fair value of goodwill, through either estimated discounted future cash flows or market-based methodologies.
The annual testing date for goodwill allocated to the Sterling Jewelers reporting unit is the last day of the fourth quarter. The annual testing date for goodwill allocated to the reporting units associated with the Zale division and the Other reporting unit is May 31. There have been no goodwill impairment charges recorded during the fiscal periods presented in the consolidated financial statements as financial results for the reporting units
74
have met or exceeded financial projections developed at the time of the acquisitions. If future economic conditions are different than those projected by management, future impairment charges may be required.
Goodwill totaled
$517.6 million
as of
January 28, 2017
and
$515.5 million
as of
January 30, 2016
.
Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized and reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If the estimated undiscounted future cash flows related to the asset are less than the carrying amount, the Company recognizes an impairment charge equal to the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value, usually determined by the estimated discounted future cash flows of the asset.
Intangible assets with definite lives, net of accumulated amortization, totaled
$12.2 million
as of
January 28, 2017
and
$25.6 million
as of
January 30, 2016
.
Intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed for impairment each year in the second quarter and may be reviewed more frequently if certain events occur or circumstances change. The Company first performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount, the Company estimates the fair value, usually determined by the estimated discounted future cash flows of the asset, compares that value with its carrying amount and records an impairment charge, if any. If future economic conditions are different than those projected by management, future impairment charges may be required.
Intangible assets with indefinite lives totaled
$404.8 million
as of
January 28, 2017
and
$402.2 million
as of
January 30, 2016
.
Income taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by applying statutory tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences between the financial reporting and tax filing bases of existing assets and liabilities are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, based on management’s evaluation of all available evidence, both positive and negative, including reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and results of recent operations.
The Company recorded a valuation allowance of
$31.5 million
and
$31.9 million
, as of
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
, respectively, due to uncertainties related to the Company’s ability to utilize some of the deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of net operating losses, foreign tax credits and foreign capital losses carried forward.
The annual effective tax rate is based on annual income, statutory tax rates and tax planning strategies available in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates.
The Company does not recognize tax benefits related to positions taken on certain tax matters unless the position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. At any point in time, various tax years are subject to or are in the process of being audited by various taxing authorities. The Company records a reserve for uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties. To the extent that management’s estimates of settlements change, or the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the income tax provision in the period in which such determinations are made.
If the reserve for uncertain tax positions decreased by 10%, the impact would be approximately
$1.0 million
as of
January 28, 2017
. See
Note 9
in Item 8 for additional information regarding deferred tax assets and unrecognized tax benefits.
Accounts receivable
Accounts receivable are stated at their nominal amounts and primarily include account balances outstanding from Sterling Jewelers division in-house customer finance programs. The finance receivables from the in-house customer finance programs are comprised of a large volume of transactions with no one customer representing a significant balance. The initial acceptance of customer finance arrangements is based on proprietary consumer credit model scores. Subsequent to the initial financed purchase, the Company monitors the credit quality of its customer finance receivable portfolio based on payment activity driving the aging of receivables, as well as proprietary models assessing each account’s probability of default. Subsequent to the initial financed purchase, the Company monitors the credit quality of its customer finance receivable portfolio based on payment activity driving the aging of receivables, as well as through the use of proprietary behavioral and collection models which assess each account’s probability of default based on performance on their account and regularly refreshed credit bureau attributes.
Accounts receivable under the customer finance programs are presented net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts. This allowance represents management’s estimate of the expected losses in the accounts receivable portfolio as of the balance sheet date, and is calculated using a model that analyzes factors such as delinquency rates and recovery rates. An allowance for amounts 90 days aged and under is established based on historical loss experience and payment performance information. A 100% allowance is made for any amount aged more than 90 days on a recency basis and any amount associated with an account the owner of which has filed for bankruptcy. The recency-aging methodology is based on receipt of qualifying payments which vary depending on the account status. A customer’s account ages each month five days after their due date listed on their statement, allowing for a grace period before collection efforts begin. A qualifying payment can be no less than 75% of the scheduled payment, increasing with the delinquency level. If an account holder is two payments behind, then they must make a full minimum payment to return to current status. If an account holder is three payments behind, then they must make three full payments before returning to a current status. If an account holder is more than three payments behind, then the entire past due amount is required to return to a current status. The allowance
75
calculation is reviewed by management to assess whether, based on economic events, additional analysis is required to appropriately estimate losses inherent in the portfolio.
Allowances for uncollectible amounts are recorded as a charge to cost of sales in the consolidated income statement. Receivables are charged off to the allowance when amounts become more than 120 days aged on the recency method and more than 240 days aged on the contractual method. The allowance at
January 28, 2017
was
$138.7 million
against a gross accounts receivable balance of
$1,952.0 million
. This compares to an allowance of
$130.0 million
against a gross accounts receivable balance of
$1,855.9 million
at
January 30, 2016
. If management’s estimate of the allowance for uncollectible accounts had been different by 10% at the end of
Fiscal 2017
, cost of sales would have been impacted by approximately
$13.9 million
.
Inventories
Inventories are primarily held for resale and are valued at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using weighted-average cost for all inventories except for inventories held in the Company’s diamond sourcing operations where cost is determined using specific identification. Inventory reserves for obsolete, slow moving or defective items are calculated as the difference between the cost of inventory and its estimated market value, based on targeted inventory turn rates, future demand, management strategy and market conditions. Due to the inventory being primarily comprised of precious stones and metals including gold, the age of the inventory has a limited impact on the estimated market value. Inventory reserves for shrinkage are estimated and recorded based on historical physical inventory results, expectations of future inventory losses and current inventory levels. Physical inventories are taken at least once annually for all store locations and distribution centers. Historically, the Company’s actual physical inventory count results have shown our estimates to be materially accurate. Management does not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that changes in the Company’s inventory shrinkage levels will occur so as to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations in future periods. The total inventory reserve was
$43.2 million
at the end of
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
. Total inventory at
January 28, 2017
was
$2,449.3 million
as compared to
$2,453.9 million
at
January 30, 2016
.
Employee Benefits
Signet operates a defined benefit pension plan in the UK (the “UK Plan”) which ceased to admit new employees effective April 2004. The UK Plan provides benefits to participating eligible employees. Beginning in Fiscal 2014, a change to the benefit structure was implemented and members’ benefits that accumulate after that date are now based upon career average salaries, whereas previously, all benefits were based on salaries at retirement.
The Company utilizes significant assumptions, along with the actual employee census data, in determining its net periodic pension cost and benefit obligations included in the consolidated financial statements.
The net periodic pension cost of the UK Plan is measured on an actuarial basis using the projected unit credit method and several actuarial assumptions, the most significant of which are the discount rate and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets.
The net periodic pension cost is charged to selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated income statements.
See
Note 19
in Item 8 for additional information.
The funded status of the UK Plan is recognized on the balance sheet, and is the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligation measured at the balance sheet date. Gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise and are not included as components of net periodic pension cost are recognized, net of tax, in OCI.
The funded status of the UK Plan at
January 28, 2017
was a
$31.9 million
asset as compared to a
$51.3 million
asset at
January 30, 2016
. Based on the composition of the assets held and obligations of the UK Plan as of
January 28, 2017
, a 10 basis point change in the discount rate would have changed the funded status of the UK Plan by approximately $3.8 million. The estimated net periodic pension cost in
Fiscal 2017
would have changed by approximately $0.6 million if a 10 basis point change in the discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on plan assets were to occur.
Accounting changes and recent accounting standards
For a description of accounting changes and recent accounting standards, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects, if any, on our consolidated financial statements, see Note 2 in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
76
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Signet is exposed to market risk arising from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and precious metal prices, which could affect its consolidated financial position, earnings and cash flows. Signet monitors and manages these market exposures as a fundamental part of its overall risk management program, which recognizes the volatility of financial markets and seeks to reduce the potentially adverse effects of this volatility on Signet’s operating results. Signet manages its exposure to market risk through its regular operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. Signet uses derivative financial instruments as risk management tools and not for trading purposes.
As certain of the UK Jewelry division’s purchases are denominated in US dollars and its net cash flows are in British pounds, Signet’s policy is to enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts and foreign currency swaps to manage the exposure to the US dollar. Signet also hedges a significant portion of forecasted merchandise purchases using commodity forward contracts. Additionally, the Zale division occasionally enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to manage the currency fluctuations associated with purchases for our Canadian operations. These contracts are entered into with large, reputable financial institutions, thereby minimizing the credit exposure from our counterparties.
Signet has significant amounts of cash and cash equivalents invested at several financial institutions. The amount invested at each financial institution takes into account the long-term credit rating and size of the financial institution. The interest rates earned on cash and cash equivalents will fluctuate in line with short-term interest rates.
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY
A committee of the Board is responsible for the implementation of market risk management policies within the treasury policies and guidelines framework, which are deemed to be appropriate by the Board for the management of market risk.
Signet’s exposure to market risk is managed by Signet’s Treasury Committee, consisting of Signet’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President - Tax and Treasury, Senior Vice President - Controller and Treasurer. Where deemed necessary to achieve the objective of reducing market risk volatility on Signet’s operating results, certain derivative instruments are entered into after review and approval by the Treasury Committee. Signet uses derivative financial instruments for risk management purposes only.
A description of Signet’s accounting policies for derivative instruments is included in Note 1 of Item 8. Signet’s current portfolio of derivative financial instruments consists of an interest rate swap, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, commodity forward purchase contracts and net zero-cost collar arrangements. An analysis quantifying the fair value change in derivative financial instruments held by Signet to manage its exposure to interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices is detailed in Note 17 of Item 8.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Approximately
91%
of Signet’s total assets were held in entities whose functional currency is the US dollar at
January 28, 2017
and generated approximately
86%
of its sales and
94%
of its operating income in US dollars in
Fiscal 2017
. All remaining assets, sales and operating income are in UK British pounds and Canadian dollars.
In translating the results of the UK Jewelry division and the Canadian subsidiary of the Zale Jewelry segment, Signet’s results are subject to fluctuations in the exchange rates between the US dollar and both the British pound and Canadian dollar. Any depreciation in the weighted average value of the US dollar against the British pound or Canadian dollar could increase reported revenues and operating profit and any appreciation in the weighted average value of the US dollar against the British pound or Canadian dollar could decrease reported revenues and operating profit.
The UK Jewelry division buys certain products and materials on international markets that are priced in US dollars, and therefore has an exposure to exchange rates on the cost of goods sold. Signet uses certain derivative financial instruments to hedge a portion of this exposure within treasury guidelines approved by the Board.
Signet holds a fluctuating amount of British pounds reflecting the cash generating characteristics of the UK Jewelry division. Signet’s objective is to minimize net foreign exchange exposure to the income statement on British pound denominated items through managing this level of cash, British pound denominated intercompany balances and US dollar to British pound swaps. In order to manage the foreign exchange exposure and minimize the level of British pound cash held by Signet, the British pound denominated subsidiaries pay dividends regularly to their immediate holding companies and excess British pounds are sold in exchange for US dollars.
Commodity Price Risk
Signet’s results are subject to fluctuations in the cost of diamonds, gold and certain other precious metals which are key raw material components of the products sold by Signet.
It is Signet’s policy to minimize the impact of precious metal commodity price volatility on operating results through the use of commodity forward purchase contracts, or by entering into either purchase options or net zero-cost collar arrangements, within treasury guidelines approved by the Board.
77
Interest Rate Risk
Signet’s interest income or expense is exposed to volatility in interest rates. This exposure is driven by both the currency denomination of the cash or debt, the mix of fixed and floating rate debt used, the type of cash investments and the total amount of cash and debt outstanding. As of
January 28, 2017
, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in additional annual interest expense of approximately
$7.3 million
, including the effect of the interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge.
Sensitivity Analysis
Management has used a sensitivity analysis technique that measures the change in the fair value of Signet’s financial instruments from hypothetical changes in market rates as shown in the table below.
Fair value changes arising from:
|
(in millions)
|
Fair Value
January 28, 2017 |
|
10 basis point decrease in
interest rates |
|
10%
depreciation of $ against £ |
|
10%
depreciation of $ against C$ |
|
10%
depreciation of gold prices |
|
Fair Value
January 30, 2016 |
||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
||||||
|
Interest rate swap
|
0.4
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
||||||
The amounts generated from the sensitivity analysis quantify the impact of market risk assuming that certain adverse market conditions, specified in the table above, occur. They are not forward-looking estimates of market risk. Actual results in the future are likely to differ materially from those projected due to changes in the portfolio of financial instruments held and actual developments in the global financial markets.
Any changes in the portfolio of financial instruments held and developments in the global financial markets may cause fluctuations in interest rates, exchange rates and precious metal prices to exceed the hypothetical amounts disclosed in the table above. The sensitivity scenarios are intended to allow an expected risk measure to be applied to the scenarios, as opposed to the scenarios themselves being an indicator of the maximum expected risk.
The fair value of derivative financial instruments is determined based on market value equivalents at period end, taking into account the current interest rate environment, current foreign currency forward rates or current commodity forward rates.
The estimated changes in the fair value for foreign exchange rates are based on a 10% depreciation of the US dollar against British pound and Canadian dollar from the levels applicable at
January 28, 2017
with all other variables remaining constant.
78
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Signet Jewelers Limited:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Signet Jewelers Limited and subsidiaries (Signet) as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, and the related consolidated income statements, statements of comprehensive income, statements of cash flows, and statements of shareholders’ equity for each of the 52 week periods ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016, and January 31, 2015. We also have audited Signet’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 28, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Signet’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting included in Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Signet as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the 52 week periods ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, Signet maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 28, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
/s/ KPMG LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
March 16, 2017
79
SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Notes
|
||||||
|
Sales
|
$
|
6,408.4
|
|
|
$
|
6,550.2
|
|
|
$
|
5,736.3
|
|
|
4
|
|
Cost of sales
|
(4,047.6
|
)
|
|
(4,109.8
|
)
|
|
(3,662.1
|
)
|
|
|
|||
|
Gross margin
|
2,360.8
|
|
|
2,440.4
|
|
|
2,074.2
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(1,880.2
|
)
|
|
(1,987.6
|
)
|
|
(1,712.9
|
)
|
|
|
|||
|
Other operating income, net
|
282.6
|
|
|
250.9
|
|
|
215.3
|
|
|
10
|
|||
|
Operating income
|
763.2
|
|
|
703.7
|
|
|
576.6
|
|
|
4
|
|||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(49.4
|
)
|
|
(45.9
|
)
|
|
(36.0
|
)
|
|
|
|||
|
Income before income taxes
|
713.8
|
|
|
657.8
|
|
|
540.6
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Income taxes
|
(170.6
|
)
|
|
(189.9
|
)
|
|
(159.3
|
)
|
|
9
|
|||
|
Net income
|
543.2
|
|
|
467.9
|
|
|
381.3
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Dividends on redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|||
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
531.3
|
|
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
7.13
|
|
|
$
|
5.89
|
|
|
$
|
4.77
|
|
|
7
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
7.08
|
|
|
$
|
5.87
|
|
|
$
|
4.75
|
|
|
7
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Basic
|
74.5
|
|
|
79.5
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
|
7
|
|||
|
Diluted
|
76.7
|
|
|
79.7
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
7
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
6
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
80
SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
Pre-tax
amount |
|
Tax
(expense) benefit |
|
After-tax
amount |
|
Pre-tax
amount |
|
Tax
(expense) benefit |
|
After-tax
amount |
|
Pre-tax
amount |
|
Tax
(expense) benefit |
|
After-tax
amount |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
543.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
(40.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(40.2
|
)
|
|
(60.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(60.6
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
|
8.8
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
(17.2
|
)
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
6.2
|
|
|||||||||
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses to net income
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
12.5
|
|
|||||||||
|
Pension plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Actuarial gain (loss)
|
(16.9
|
)
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
(20.4
|
)
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial losses
|
1.5
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
1.6
|
|
|||||||||
|
Prior service costs
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of net prior service credits
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
|
$
|
(35.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
(33.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
(37.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58.1
|
)
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
509.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
430.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
323.2
|
|
||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
81
SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
(in millions, except par value per share amount)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
|
Notes
|
|||||
|
Assets
|
|
|
As adjusted
|
|
2
|
|
||||
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
98.7
|
|
|
$
|
137.7
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
1,858.0
|
|
|
1,756.4
|
|
|
11
|
|
||
|
Other receivables
|
95.9
|
|
|
84.0
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Other current assets
|
136.3
|
|
|
152.6
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Income taxes
|
4.4
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Inventories
|
2,449.3
|
|
|
2,453.9
|
|
|
12
|
|
||
|
Total current assets
|
4,642.6
|
|
|
4,588.1
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Non-current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
822.9
|
|
|
727.6
|
|
|
13
|
|
||
|
Goodwill
|
517.6
|
|
|
515.5
|
|
|
14
|
|
||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
417.0
|
|
|
427.8
|
|
|
14
|
|
||
|
Other assets
|
165.1
|
|
|
154.6
|
|
|
15
|
|
||
|
Deferred tax assets
|
0.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
||
|
Retirement benefit asset
|
31.9
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
19
|
|
||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
6,597.8
|
|
|
$
|
6,464.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Loans and overdrafts
|
$
|
91.1
|
|
|
$
|
57.7
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
255.7
|
|
|
269.1
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
478.2
|
|
|
498.3
|
|
|
21
|
|
||
|
Deferred revenue
|
276.9
|
|
|
260.3
|
|
|
22
|
|
||
|
Income taxes
|
101.8
|
|
|
65.7
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Total current liabilities
|
1,203.7
|
|
|
1,151.1
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Long-term debt
|
1,317.9
|
|
|
1,321.0
|
|
|
20
|
|
||
|
Other liabilities
|
213.7
|
|
|
230.5
|
|
|
23
|
|
||
|
Deferred revenue
|
659.0
|
|
|
629.1
|
|
|
22
|
|
||
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
101.4
|
|
|
72.5
|
|
|
9
|
|
||
|
Total liabilities
|
3,495.7
|
|
|
3,404.2
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
||||
|
Series A redeemable convertible preferred shares of $0.01 par value: 500 shares authorized,
0.625 shares outstanding |
611.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
||
|
Shareholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Common shares of $0.18 par value: authorized 500 shares, 68.3 shares outstanding
(2016: 79.4 outstanding) |
15.7
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
6
|
|
||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
280.7
|
|
|
279.9
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Other reserves
|
0.4
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Treasury shares at cost: 18.9 shares (2016: 7.8 shares)
|
(1,494.8
|
)
|
|
(495.8
|
)
|
|
6
|
|
||
|
Retained earnings
|
3,995.9
|
|
|
3,534.6
|
|
|
6
|
|
||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(307.7
|
)
|
|
(274.1
|
)
|
|
8
|
|
||
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
2,490.2
|
|
|
3,060.7
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred shares and shareholders’ equity
|
$
|
6,597.8
|
|
|
$
|
6,464.9
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
82
SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
543.2
|
|
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
188.8
|
|
|
175.3
|
|
|
149.7
|
|
|||
|
Amortization of unfavorable leases and contracts
|
(19.7
|
)
|
|
(28.7
|
)
|
|
(23.7
|
)
|
|||
|
Pension benefit
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|||
|
Share-based compensation
|
8.0
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|||
|
Deferred taxation
|
27.7
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
(47.6
|
)
|
|||
|
Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|||
|
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs
|
2.8
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|||
|
Other non-cash movements
|
0.4
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|||
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Increase in accounts receivable
|
(102.7
|
)
|
|
(189.8
|
)
|
|
(194.6
|
)
|
|||
|
Increase in other receivables and other assets
|
(20.4
|
)
|
|
(44.1
|
)
|
|
(18.0
|
)
|
|||
|
Decrease (increase) in other current assets
|
13.5
|
|
|
(26.5
|
)
|
|
(35.5
|
)
|
|||
|
Increase in inventories
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
(46.0
|
)
|
|
(121.6
|
)
|
|||
|
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
23.7
|
|
|||
|
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
(21.8
|
)
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
64.8
|
|
|||
|
Increase in deferred revenue
|
43.6
|
|
|
76.3
|
|
|
102.3
|
|
|||
|
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable
|
38.9
|
|
|
(25.7
|
)
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|||
|
Pension plan contributions
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
678.3
|
|
|
443.3
|
|
|
283.0
|
|
|||
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
(278.0
|
)
|
|
(226.5
|
)
|
|
(220.2
|
)
|
|||
|
Purchase of available-for-sale securities
|
(10.4
|
)
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|||
|
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities
|
10.0
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|||
|
Acquisition of Zale Corporation, net of cash acquired
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,429.2
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(278.4
|
)
|
|
(228.7
|
)
|
|
(1,652.6
|
)
|
|||
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Dividends paid on common shares
|
(75.6
|
)
|
|
(67.1
|
)
|
|
(55.3
|
)
|
|||
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares
|
2.1
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|||
|
Proceeds from issuance of redeemable convertible preferred shares, net of issuance costs
|
611.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards
|
2.4
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|||
|
Proceeds from senior notes
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
398.4
|
|
|||
|
Proceeds from term loan
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
400.0
|
|
|||
|
Repayments of term loan
|
(16.4
|
)
|
|
(25.0
|
)
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|||
|
Proceeds from securitization facility
|
2,404.1
|
|
|
2,303.9
|
|
|
1,941.9
|
|
|||
|
Repayments of securitization facility
|
(2,404.1
|
)
|
|
(2,303.9
|
)
|
|
(1,341.9
|
)
|
|||
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
|
1,270.0
|
|
|
316.0
|
|
|
260.0
|
|
|||
|
Repayments of revolving credit facility
|
(1,214.0
|
)
|
|
(316.0
|
)
|
|
(260.0
|
)
|
|||
|
Payment of debt issuance costs
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(20.5
|
)
|
|||
|
Repurchase of common shares
|
(1,000.0
|
)
|
|
(130.0
|
)
|
|
(29.8
|
)
|
|||
|
Net settlement of equity based awards
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
(18.4
|
)
|
|||
|
Principal payments under capital lease obligations
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|||
|
Proceeds from (repayment of) short-term borrowings
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
(47.1
|
)
|
|
39.4
|
|
|||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(438.2
|
)
|
|
(266.6
|
)
|
|
1,320.9
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
137.7
|
|
|
193.6
|
|
|
247.6
|
|
|||
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(38.3
|
)
|
|
(52.0
|
)
|
|
(48.7
|
)
|
|||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
98.7
|
|
|
$
|
137.7
|
|
|
$
|
193.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Non-cash investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Capital expenditures in accounts payable
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
|
$
|
9.3
|
|
|
$
|
6.2
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Interest paid
|
$
|
47.1
|
|
|
$
|
41.6
|
|
|
$
|
25.4
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
$
|
104.0
|
|
|
$
|
180.1
|
|
|
$
|
208.8
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
83
SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
(in millions)
|
Common
shares at par value |
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
|
Other
reserves |
|
Treasury
shares |
|
Retained
earnings |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
Total
shareholders’ equity |
||||||||||||||
|
Balance at February 1, 2014
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
$
|
258.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
(346.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,812.9
|
|
|
$
|
(178.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,563.1
|
|
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
381.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
381.3
|
|
|||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(58.1
|
)
|
|
(58.1
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Dividends on common shares
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(57.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(57.7
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Repurchase of common shares
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(29.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(29.8
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net settlement of equity based awards
|
—
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Share options exercised
|
—
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|||||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|||||||
|
Balance at January 31, 2015
|
15.7
|
|
|
265.2
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
(370.0
|
)
|
|
3,135.7
|
|
|
(236.6
|
)
|
|
2,810.4
|
|
|||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
467.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
467.9
|
|
|||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(37.5
|
)
|
|
(37.5
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Dividends on common shares
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(70.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(70.2
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Repurchase of common shares
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(130.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(130.0
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net settlement of equity based awards
|
—
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Share options exercised
|
—
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|||||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|||||||
|
Balance at January 30, 2016
|
15.7
|
|
|
279.9
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
(495.8
|
)
|
|
3,534.6
|
|
|
(274.1
|
)
|
|
3,060.7
|
|
|||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
543.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
543.2
|
|
|||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(33.6
|
)
|
|
(33.6
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Dividends on common shares
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(75.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(75.9
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Dividends on redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Repurchase of common shares
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,000.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,000.0
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net settlement of equity based awards
|
—
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Share options exercised
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|||||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|||||||
|
Balance at January 28, 2017
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
$
|
280.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
(1,494.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,995.9
|
|
|
$
|
(307.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,490.2
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
84
SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1
. Organization and summary of significant accounting policies
Signet Jewelers Limited (“Signet” or the “Company”), a holding company incorporated in Bermuda, is the world’s largest retailer of diamond jewelry. The Company operates through its 100% owned subsidiaries with sales primarily in the United States (“US”), United Kingdom (“UK”) and Canada. Signet manages its business as
five
reportable segments: the Sterling Jewelers division, the Zale division, which consists of the Zale Jewelry and Piercing Pagoda segments, the UK Jewelry division and Other. The “Other” reportable segment consists of all non-reportable segments, including subsidiaries involved in the purchasing and conversion of rough diamonds to polished stones and unallocated corporate administrative functions. See Note
4
for additional discussion of the Company’s segments.
Signet’s sales are seasonal, with the first quarter slightly exceeding
20%
of annual sales, the second and third quarters each approximating
20%
and the fourth quarter accounting for almost
40%
of annual sales, with December being by far the most important month of the year. The “Holiday Season” consists of results for the months of November and December. As a result, approximately
45%
to
55%
of Signet’s annual operating income normally occurs in the fourth quarter, comprised of nearly all of the UK Jewelry and Zale divisions’ annual operating income and about
40%
to
45%
of the Sterling Jewelers division’s annual operating income.
The Company has evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through the date the financial statements were issued. There are no material related party transactions. The following accounting policies have been applied consistently in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements.
(a) Basis of preparation
The consolidated financial statements of Signet are prepared in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) and include the results for the
52 week period ended
January 28, 2017
(“
Fiscal 2017
”), as Signet’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to January 31. The comparative periods are for the
52 week period ended
January 30, 2016
(“
Fiscal 2016
”) and the
52 week period ended
January 31, 2015
(“
Fiscal 2015
”). Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
(b) Use of estimates
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements, in conformity with US GAAP and US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates and assumptions are primarily made in relation to the valuation of accounts receivable, inventories, deferred revenue, derivatives, employee benefits, income taxes, contingencies, asset impairments, indefinite-lived intangible assets, as well as depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets.
The reported results of operations are not indicative of results expected in future periods.
(c) Foreign currency translation
The financial position and operating results of certain foreign operations, including the UK Jewelry division and the Canadian operations of the Zale Jewelry segment, are consolidated using the local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated at the rates of exchange on the balance sheet date, and revenues and expenses are translated at the monthly average rates of exchange during the period. Resulting translation gains or losses are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”). Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included within the consolidated income statements, whereas translation adjustments and gains or losses related to intercompany loans of a long-term investment nature are recognized as a component of AOCI.
See Note
8
for additional discussion of the Company’s foreign currency translation.
(d)
Revenue recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery of products has occurred or services have been rendered, the sale price is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company’s revenue streams and their respective accounting treatments are discussed below.
Merchandise sale and repairs
Store sales are recognized when the customer receives and pays for the merchandise at the store with cash, in-house customer finance, private label credit card programs or a third party credit card. For online sales shipped to customers, sales are recognized at the estimated time the customer has received the merchandise. Amounts related to shipping and handling that are billed to customers are reflected in sales and the related costs are reflected in cost of sales. Revenues on the sale of merchandise are reported net of anticipated returns and sales tax collected. Returns are
85
estimated based on previous return rates experienced. Any deposits received from a customer for merchandise are deferred and recognized as revenue when the customer receives the merchandise. Revenues derived from providing replacement merchandise on behalf of insurance organizations are recognized upon receipt of the merchandise by the customer. Revenues on repair of merchandise are recognized when the service is complete and the customer collects the merchandise at the store.
Extended service plans and lifetime warranty agreements (“ESP”)
The Company recognizes revenue related to ESP sales in proportion to when the expected costs will be incurred. The deferral period for ESP sales in each division is determined from patterns of claims costs, including estimates of future claims costs expected to be incurred. Management reviews the trends in claims to assess whether changes are required to the revenue and cost recognition rates utilized. A significant change in estimates related to the time period or pattern in which warranty-related costs are expected to be incurred could materially impact revenues. All direct costs associated with the sale of these plans are deferred and amortized in proportion to the revenue recognized and disclosed as either other current assets or other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
The Sterling Jewelers division sells ESP, subject to certain conditions, to perform repair work over the life of the product. Revenue from the sale of the lifetime ESP is recognized consistent with the estimated pattern of claim costs expected to be incurred by the Company in connection with performing under the ESP obligations. Based on an evaluation of historical claims data, management currently estimates that substantially all claims will be incurred within
17
years of the sale of the warranty contract.
In the second quarter of Fiscal 2016, an operational change related to the Sterling Jewelers division’s ESP associated with ring sizing was made to further align Zale and Sterling ESP policies. As a result, revenue from the sale of these lifetime ESP in the Sterling Jewelers division is deferred and recognized over
17
years for all plans, with approximately
57%
of revenue recognized within the first
two
years for plans sold on or after May 2, 2015
(
January 30, 2016
:
57%
) and
42%
of revenue recognized within the first two years for plans sold prior to May 2, 2015
(
January 30, 2016
:
42%
;
January 31, 2015
:
45%
).
The Zale division also sells ESP. Zale Jewelry customers are offered lifetime warranties on certain products that cover sizing and breakage with an option to purchase theft protection for a two-year period. Revenue from the sale of lifetime ESP is deferred and recognized over 10 years, with approximately
69%
of revenue recognized within the first two years (
January 30, 2016
:
69%
;
January 31, 2015
:
69%
).
Revenues related to the optional theft protection are deferred and recognized in proportion to when the expected claims costs will be incurred over the two-year contract period. Zale Jewelry customers are also offered a two-year watch warranty and a one-year warranty that covers breakage. Piercing Pagoda customers are also offered a one-year warranty that covers breakage. Revenue from the two-year watch warranty and one-year breakage warranty is recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective contract terms.
The Sterling Jewelers division also sells a Jewelry Replacement Plan (“JRP”). The JRP is designed to protect customers from damage or defects of purchased merchandise for a period of three years. If the purchased merchandise is defective or becomes damaged under normal use in that time period, the item will be replaced. JRP revenue is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the period of expected claims costs.
Signet also sells warranty agreements in the capacity of an agent on behalf of a third-party. The commission that Signet receives from the third-party is recognized at the time of sale less an estimate of cancellations based on historical experience.
Sale vouchers
Certain promotional offers award sale vouchers to customers who make purchases above a certain value, which grant a fixed discount on a future purchase within a stated time frame. The Company accounts for such vouchers by allocating the fair value of the voucher between the initial purchase and the future purchase using the relative-selling-price method. Sale vouchers are not sold on a stand-alone basis. The fair value of the voucher is determined based on the average sales transactions in which the vouchers were issued, when the vouchers are expected to be redeemed and the estimated voucher redemption rate. The fair value allocated to the future purchase is recorded as deferred revenue.
Consignment inventory sales
Sales of consignment inventory are accounted for on a gross sales basis as the Company is the primary obligor providing independent advice, guidance and after-sales service to customers. The products sold from consignment inventory are indistinguishable from other products that are sold to customers and are sold on the same terms. Supplier products are selected at the discretion of the Company. The Company is responsible for determining the selling price, physical security of the products and collections of accounts receivable.
(e) Cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses
Cost of sales includes merchandise costs net of discounts and allowances, freight, processing and distribution costs of moving merchandise from suppliers to distribution centers and stores inclusive of payroll, inventory shrinkage, store operating and occupancy costs, net bad debts and charges for late payments under the in-house customer finance programs. Store operating and occupancy costs include utilities, rent, real estate taxes, common area maintenance charges and depreciation. Selling, general and administrative expenses include store staff and store administrative costs; centralized administrative expenses, including information technology and credit; advertising and promotional costs and other operating expenses not specifically categorized elsewhere in the consolidated income statements.
86
Compensation and benefits costs included within cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses were as follows:
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Wages and salaries
|
$
|
1,183.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,222.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,095.6
|
|
|
Payroll taxes
|
96.5
|
|
|
101.1
|
|
|
91.8
|
|
|||
|
Employee benefit plans
|
19.3
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|||
|
Share-based compensation
|
8.0
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|||
|
Total compensation and benefits
|
$
|
1,307.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,357.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,209.1
|
|
(f) Store opening costs
The opening costs of new locations are expensed as incurred.
(g) Advertising and promotional costs
Advertising and promotional costs are expensed within selling, general and administrative expenses. Production costs are expensed at the first communication of the advertisements, while communication expenses are recognized each time the advertisement is communicated. For catalogs and circulars, costs are all expensed at the first date they can be viewed by the customer. Point of sale promotional material is expensed when first displayed in the stores. Gross advertising costs totaled
$380.6 million
in
Fiscal 2017
(
Fiscal 2016
:
$384.2 million
;
Fiscal 2015
:
$333.0 million
).
(h) In-house customer finance programs
Sterling Jewelers division operates customer in-house finance programs that allow customers to finance merchandise purchases from its stores. Finance charges are recognized in accordance with the contractual agreements. Gross interest earned is recorded as other operating income in the consolidated income statements. See Note
10
for additional discussion of the Company’s other operating income. In addition to interest-bearing accounts, a portion of credit sales are made using interest-free financing for
one
year or less, subject to certain conditions.
Accrual of interest is suspended when accounts become more than
90
days aged on a recency basis. Upon suspension of the accrual of interest, interest income is subsequently recognized to the extent cash payments are received. Accrual of interest is resumed when receivables are removed from the non-accrual status.
(i)
Income taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by applying statutory tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences between the financial reporting and tax filing bases of existing assets and liabilities are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, based on management’s evaluation of all available evidence, both positive and negative, including reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and results of recent operations.
The Company does not recognize tax benefits related to positions taken on certain tax matters unless the position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. At any point in time, various tax years are subject to or are in the process of being audited by various taxing authorities. The Company records a reserve for uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties. To the extent that management’s estimates of settlements change, or the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the income tax provision in the period in which such determinations are made.
See Note
9
for additional discussion of the Company’s income taxes.
(j) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of cash on hand, money market deposits and amounts placed with external fund managers with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair value. In addition, receivables from third-party credit card issuers typically converted to cash within 5 days of the original sales transaction are considered cash equivalents.
The following table summarizes the details of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents:
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents held in money markets and other accounts
|
$
|
65.6
|
|
|
$
|
100.4
|
|
|
Cash equivalents from third-party credit card issuers
|
31.1
|
|
|
35.4
|
|
||
|
Cash on hand
|
2.0
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
||
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
98.7
|
|
|
$
|
137.7
|
|
87
(k)
Accounts receivable
Accounts receivable under the customer finance programs are presented net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts. This allowance represents management’s estimate of the expected losses in the accounts receivable portfolio as of the balance sheet date, and is calculated using a model that analyzes factors such as delinquency rates and recovery rates. An allowance for amounts
90
days aged and under on a recency basis is established based on historical loss experience and payment performance information. A
100%
allowance is made for any amount aged more than
90
days on a recency basis and any amount associated with an account the owner of which has filed for bankruptcy.
Signet’s recency method of aging has been in place and unchanged since the inception of the in-house consumer financing program. The delinquency level is measured by the number of days since the last qualifying payment was received, with the qualifying payment increasing with delinquency level. The average minimum scheduled payment on a customer account is
8%
. The minimum payment does not decline as the balance declines.
See Note
11
for additional discussion of the Company’s accounts receivables.
(l)
Inventories
Inventories are primarily held for resale and are valued at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using weighted-average cost for all inventories except for inventories held in the Company’s diamond sourcing operations, where cost is determined using specific identification. Cost includes charges directly related to bringing inventory to its present location and condition. Such charges would include warehousing, security, distribution and certain buying costs. Market value is defined as estimated selling price less all estimated costs of completion and costs to be incurred in marketing, selling and distribution. Inventory reserves are recorded for obsolete, slow moving or defective items and shrinkage. Inventory reserves for obsolete, slow moving or defective items are calculated as the difference between the cost of inventory and its estimated market value based on targeted inventory turn rates, future demand, management strategy and market conditions. Due to the inventory being primarily comprised of precious stones and metals including gold, the age of the inventory has a limited impact on the estimated market value. Inventory reserves for shrinkage are estimated and recorded based on historical physical inventory results, expectations of future inventory losses and current inventory levels. Physical inventories are taken at least once annually for all store locations and distribution centers.
See Note
12
for additional discussion of the Company’s inventories.
(m) Vendor contributions
Contributions are received from vendors through various programs and arrangements including cooperative advertising. Where vendor contributions related to identifiable promotional events are received, contributions are matched against the costs of promotions. Vendor contributions received as general contributions and not related to specific promotional events are recognized as a reduction of inventory costs.
(n)
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, amortization and impairment charges. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation and amortization are recognized on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets as follows:
|
Buildings
|
|
30 – 40 years when land is owned or the remaining term of lease, not to exceed 40 years
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Remaining term of lease, not to exceed 10 years
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
Ranging from 3 – 10 years
|
|
Equipment and software
|
|
Ranging from 3 – 5 years
|
Computer software purchased or developed for internal use is stated at cost less accumulated amortization. Signet’s policy provides for the capitalization of external direct costs of materials and services associated with developing or obtaining internal use computer software. In addition, Signet also capitalizes certain payroll and payroll-related costs for employees directly associated with internal use computer projects. Amortization is charged on a straight-line basis over periods from
three
to
five
years.
Property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Potentially impaired assets or asset groups are identified by reviewing the cash flows of individual stores. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, based on the Company’s internal business plans. If the undiscounted cash flow is less than the asset’s carrying amount, the impairment charge recognized is determined by estimating the fair value of the assets and recording a loss for the amount that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value. The Company utilizes historical experience, internal business plans and an appropriate discount rate to estimate the fair value. Property and equipment at stores planned for closure are depreciated over a revised estimate of their useful lives.
See Note
13
for additional discussion of the Company’s property, plant and equipment.
88
(o)
Goodwill and intangibles
In a business combination, the Company estimates and records the fair value of identifiable intangible assets and liabilities acquired. The fair value of these intangible assets and liabilities is estimated based on management’s assessment, including determination of appropriate valuation technique and consideration of any third party appraisals, when necessary. Significant estimates in valuing intangible assets and liabilities acquired include, but are not limited to, future expected cash flows associated with the acquired asset or liability, expected life and discount rates. The excess purchase price over the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill. Goodwill is recorded by the Company’s reporting units based on the acquisitions made by each.
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually and more frequently if indicators of impairment arise. In evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value (including goodwill). If the Company concludes that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, then no further testing is required. However, if the Company concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, then the two-step goodwill impairment test is performed to identify a potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of impairment to be recognized, if any. The two-step impairment test involves estimating the fair value of all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including the implied fair value of goodwill, through either estimated discounted future cash flows or market-based methodologies.
The annual testing date for goodwill allocated to the Sterling Jewelers reporting unit is the last day of the fourth quarter. The annual testing date for goodwill allocated to the reporting units associated with the Zale division and the Other reporting unit is May 31. There have been no goodwill impairment charges recorded during the fiscal periods presented in the consolidated financial statements as financial results for the reporting units have met or exceeded financial projections developed at the time of the acquisitions. If future economic conditions are different than those projected by management, future impairment charges may be required.
Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized and reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If the estimated undiscounted future cash flows related to the asset are less than the carrying amount, the Company recognizes an impairment charge equal to the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value, usually determined by the estimated discounted future cash flows of the asset.
Intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed for impairment each year in the second quarter and may be reviewed more frequently if certain events occur or circumstances change. The Company first performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount, the Company estimates the fair value, usually determined by the estimated discounted future cash flows of the asset, compares that value with its carrying amount and records an impairment charge, if any. If future economic conditions are different than those projected by management, future impairment charges may be required.
See Note
14
for additional discussion of the Company’s goodwill and intangibles.
(p) Derivatives and hedge accounting
The Company enters into various types of derivative instruments to mitigate certain risk exposures related to changes in commodity costs and foreign exchange rates. Derivative instruments are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, as either assets or liabilities, with an offset to net income or other comprehensive income (“OCI”), depending on whether the derivative qualifies as an effective hedge.
If a derivative instrument meets certain criteria, it may be designated as a cash flow hedge on the date it is entered into. For cash flow hedge transactions, the effective portion of the changes in fair value of the derivative instrument is recognized directly in equity as a component of AOCI and is recognized in the consolidated income statements in the same period(s) and on the same financial statement line in which the hedged item affects net income. Amounts excluded from the effectiveness calculation and any ineffective portions of the change in fair value of the derivatives are recognized immediately in other operating income, net in the consolidated income statements. In addition, gains and losses on derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognized immediately in other operating income, net.
In the normal course of business, the Company may terminate cash flow hedges prior to the occurrence of the underlying forecasted transaction. For cash flow hedges terminated prior to the occurrence of the underlying forecasted transaction, management monitors the probability of the associated forecasted cash flow transactions to assess whether any gain or loss recorded in AOCI should be immediately recognized in net income. Cash flows from derivative contracts are included in net cash provided by operating activities.
See Note
17
for additional discussion of the Company’s derivatives and hedge activities.
(q)
Employee Benefits
Signet operates a defined benefit pension plan in the UK (the “UK Plan”) which ceased to admit new employees effective April 2004. The UK Plan provides benefits to participating eligible employees. Beginning in Fiscal 2014, a change to the benefit structure was implemented and members’ benefits that accumulate after that date are now based upon career average salaries, whereas previously, all benefits were based on salaries at retirement.
The UK Plan’s assets are held by the UK Plan.
89
The net periodic pension cost of the UK Plan is measured on an actuarial basis using the projected unit credit method and several actuarial assumptions, the most significant of which are the discount rate and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets.
Other material assumptions include rates of participant mortality, the expected long-term rate of compensation and pension increases, and rates of employee attrition. Gains and losses occur when actual experience differs from actuarial assumptions. If such gains or losses exceed 10% of the greater of plan assets or plan liabilities, Signet amortizes those gains or losses over the average remaining service period of the employees.
The net periodic pension cost is charged to selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated income statements.
The funded status of the UK Plan is recognized on the balance sheet, and is the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligation measured at the balance sheet date. Gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise and are not included as components of net periodic pension cost are recognized, net of tax, in OCI.
Signet also operates a defined contribution plan in the UK and a defined contribution retirement savings plan in the US. Contributions made by Signet to these pension arrangements are charged primarily to selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated income statements as incurred.
See Note
19
for additional discussion of the Company’s employee benefits.
(r) Borrowing costs
Borrowings include interest-bearing bank loans, accounts receivable securitization program and bank overdrafts. Borrowing costs are capitalized and amortized into interest expense over the contractual term of the related loan.
See Note
20
for additional discussion of the Company’s borrowing costs.
(s) Share-based compensation
Signet measures share-based compensation cost for awards classified as equity at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the award and recognizes the cost as an expense on a straight-line basis (net of estimated forfeitures) over the requisite service period of employees. Certain share plans include a condition whereby vesting is contingent on growth exceeding a given target, and therefore awards granted with this condition are considered to be performance-based awards.
Signet estimates fair value using a Black-Scholes model for awards granted under the Omnibus Plan and the binomial valuation model for awards granted under the Share Saving Plans. Deferred tax assets for awards that result in deductions on the income tax returns of subsidiaries are recorded by Signet based on the amount of compensation cost recognized and the subsidiaries’ statutory tax rate in the jurisdiction in which it will receive a deduction. Differences between the deferred tax assets recognized for financial reporting purposes and the actual tax deduction reported on the subsidiaries’ income tax return are recorded in additional paid-in-capital (if the tax deduction exceeds the deferred tax asset) or in the income statement (if the deferred tax asset exceeds the tax deduction and no additional paid-in-capital exists from previous awards).
Share-based compensation is primarily recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated income statements, along with the relevant salary cost.
See Note
24
for additional discussion of the Company’s share-based compensation plans.
(t) Contingent liabilities
Provisions for contingent liabilities are recorded for probable losses when management is able to reasonably estimate the loss or range of loss. When it is reasonably possible that a contingent liability may result in a loss or additional loss, the range of the loss is disclosed.
See Note
25
for additional discussion of the Company’s contingencies.
(u) Leases
Signet’s operating leases generally include retail store locations. Certain operating leases include predetermined rent increases, which are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term, including any construction period or other rental holiday. Other amounts paid under operating leases, such as contingent rentals, taxes and common area maintenance, are charged to the income statement as incurred. Premiums paid to acquire short-term leasehold properties and inducements to enter into a lease are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. In addition, certain leases provide for contingent rentals that are not measurable at inception. These contingent rentals are primarily based on a percentage of sales in excess of a predetermined level. These amounts are excluded from minimum rent and are included in the determination of rent expense when it is probable that the expense has been incurred and the amount is reasonably estimable.
See Note
25
for additional discussion of the Company’s leases.
(v)
Common shares
New shares are recorded in common shares at their par value when issued. The excess of the issue price over the par value is recorded in additional paid-in capital.
90
(w) Preferred shares
On
October 5, 2016
, the Company issued
625,000
shares of Series A Convertible Preference Shares (“preferred shares”) for an aggregate price of
$625.0 million
. The preferred shares were issued under an effective registration statement filed with the SEC. The accounting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,” requires preferred securities that are redeemable for cash or other assets to be classified outside of permanent equity if redeemable at a fixed or determinable price on a fixed or determinable date, at the option of the holder, or upon the occurrence of an event that is not solely within the control of the issuer. The Company's preferred shares were classified as temporary equity and recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value upon issuance.
See Note
5
for additional information regarding the Company's preferred shares.
(x) Dividends
Dividends on common shares are reflected as a reduction of retained earnings in the period in which they are formally declared by the Board of Directors (the “Board”). In addition, the cumulative dividends on preferred shares, whether or not declared, are reflected as a reduction of retained earnings.
2
. New accounting pronouncements
New accounting pronouncements adopted during the period
Share-based compensation
In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-12, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period.” The new guidance requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. ASU No. 2014-12 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. Signet adopted this guidance during
Fiscal 2017
. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Debt issuance costs
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” The new guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability, similar to the presentation of debt discounts. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, “Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” The new guidance provides clarity that the SEC would not object to the deferral and presentation of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement. ASU Nos. 2015-03 and 2015-15 are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. Signet adopted this guidance during
Fiscal 2017
. Accordingly, the Company adjusted the consolidated balance sheet as of
January 30, 2016
by reducing total assets and debt for amounts classified as deferred debt issuance costs of
$9.5 million
. Signet continues to present debt issuance costs relating to its revolving credit facility and asset-backed securitization facility as other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
See Note
20
for additional discussion of the Company's debt issuance costs.
New accounting pronouncements to be adopted in future periods
Credit losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” The new guidance requires entities to measure and recognize expected credit losses for financial assets measured at amortized cost basis. The estimate of expected credit losses should consider historical information, current information, and reasonable and supportable forecasts of expected losses over the remaining contractual life that affect collectibility. ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. Signet currently expects to adopt this guidance when effective, and continues to assess the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Revenue recognition
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The new guidance affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets, unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (for example, insurance contracts or lease contracts). The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration
91
to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU No. 2014-09 provides alternative methods of retrospective adoption. In August 2015, the FASB issued an update (ASU No. 2015-14) that defers the effective date by one year. As a result, ASU No. 2014-09 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that annual period.
There are many aspects of this new accounting guidance that are still being interpreted. The FASB has recently issued updates to certain aspects of the guidance to address implementation issues. In March 2016, the FASB issued additional guidance concerning “Principal versus Agent” considerations (reporting revenue gross versus net); in April 2016, the FASB issued additional guidance on identifying performance obligations and licensing; and in May 2016, the FASB issued additional guidance on collectibility, noncash consideration, presentation of sales tax, and transition. These updates are intended to improve the operability and understandability of the implementation guidance and have the same effective date and transition requirements as ASU No. 2014-09 guidance discussed above.
Signet is in the process of evaluating contracts with customers under the new guidance and cannot currently estimate the financial statement impact of adoption. The Company expects to progress through its assessment during Fiscal 2018 and will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending February 2, 2019. A decision has not yet been made regarding the transition method the Company will use to adopt the new guidance.
Inventory
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory.” The new guidance states that inventory will be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The ASU defines net realizable value as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. ASU No. 2015-11 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. Signet plans to adopt this guidance in the first quarter of Fiscal 2018. Signet does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Financial instruments
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The new guidance primarily impacts accounting for equity investments and financial liabilities under the fair value option, as well as, the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. Under the new guidance, equity investments will generally be measured at fair value, with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in net income. ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Signet plans to adopt this guidance in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending February 2, 2019. Signet does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” The new guidance primarily impacts lessee accounting by requiring the recognition of a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability on the balance sheet for long-term lease agreements. The lease liability will be equal to the present value of all reasonably certain lease payments. The right-of-use asset will be based on the liability, subject to adjustment for initial direct costs. Lease agreements that are 12 months or less are permitted to be excluded from the balance sheet. In general, leases will be amortized on a straight-line basis with the exception of finance lease agreements. ASU No. 2016-02 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Signet is currently assessing the timing of adoption which is effective for the first quarter of our fiscal year ending February 1, 2020 and the impact that adopting this guidance will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Liabilities
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-04, “Liabilities - Extinguishments of Liabilities (Subtopic 405-20).” The new guidance addresses diversity in practice related to the derecognition of a prepaid stored-value product liability. Liabilities related to the sale of prepaid stored-value products within the scope of this update are financial liabilities. ASU No. 2016-04 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. Signet plans to adopt this guidance in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending February 2, 2019. Signet does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Share-based compensation
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” The new guidance simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-09 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. This guidance is effective for Signet in the first quarter of Fiscal 2018. Signet does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
92
3
. Acquisitions
Zale Corporation
On May 29, 2014, the Company acquired
100%
of the outstanding shares of Zale Corporation, making the entity a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary of Signet (the “Zale Acquisition” or “Acquisition”). Under the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, Zale Corporation shareholders received $
21
per share in cash for each outstanding share of common stock and the vesting, upon consummation of the Acquisition, of certain outstanding Zale Corporation restricted stock units and stock options, which converted into the right to receive the merger consideration of
$1,458.0 million
, including
$478.2 million
to extinguish Zale Corporation’s existing debt. The Acquisition was funded by the Company through existing cash and the issuance of
$1,400.0 million
of long-term debt, including: (a)
$400.0 million
of senior unsecured notes due in 2024, (b)
$600.0 million
of
two
-year revolving asset-backed variable funding notes, and (c) a
$400.0 million
five
-year senior unsecured term loan facility. See Note
20
for additional information related to the Company’s long-term debt instruments.
The transaction was accounted for as a business combination during the second quarter of Fiscal 2015. The Acquisition aligns with the Company’s strategy to expand its footprint. The following table summarizes the consideration transferred in conjunction with the Acquisition as of May 29, 2014:
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
Amount
|
||
|
Cash consideration paid to Zale Corporation shareholders ($21 per share)
|
$
|
910.2
|
|
|
Cash consideration paid for settlement of Zale Corporation stock options, restricted share awards and long term incentive plan awards
|
69.6
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to extinguish Zale Corporation outstanding debt as of May 29, 2014
|
478.2
|
|
|
|
Total consideration transferred
|
$
|
1,458.0
|
|
Under the acquisition method of accounting, the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at acquisition date fair values. During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2015, the Company finalized the valuation of net assets acquired. The following table summarizes the fair values identified for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Acquisition as of May 29, 2014:
|
(in millions)
|
Fair values
|
||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
28.8
|
|
|
Inventories
|
856.7
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
103.6
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
||
|
Trade names
|
417.0
|
|
|
|
Favorable leases
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
132.8
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
25.4
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
(1)
|
(206.3
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
(93.3
|
)
|
|
|
Unfavorable leases
|
(50.5
|
)
|
|
|
Unfavorable contracts
|
(65.6
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
(234.0
|
)
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
(28.6
|
)
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired
|
958.6
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
499.4
|
|
|
|
Total consideration transferred
|
$
|
1,458.0
|
|
(1)
Includes loans and overdrafts, accounts payable, income taxes payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities.
The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed was recognized as goodwill. The goodwill attributable to the Acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes. See Note
14
for additional discussion of the Company’s goodwill.
The following unaudited consolidated pro forma information summarizes the results of operations of the Company as if the Acquisition and related issuance of
$1,400.0 million
of long-term debt (see Note
20
) had occurred as of February 2, 2013. The unaudited consolidated pro forma financial information was prepared in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting under existing standards and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred if the Acquisition had been completed on the date indicated, nor is it indicative of the future operating results of the Company.
93
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||
|
Pro forma sales
|
$
|
6,325.1
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
$
|
462.1
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share – basic
|
$
|
5.78
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share – diluted
|
$
|
5.76
|
|
The unaudited pro forma information gives effect to actual operating results prior to the Acquisition and has been adjusted with respect to certain aspects of the Acquisition to reflect the following:
|
•
|
Acquisition accounting adjustments to reset deferred revenue associated with extended service plans sold by Zale Corporation prior to the Acquisition to fair value as of the acquisition date. The fair value of deferred revenue is determined based on the estimated costs remaining to be incurred for future obligations associated with the outstanding plans at the time of the Acquisition, plus a reasonable profit margin on the estimated costs. These adjustments also reflect the impact of deferring the revenue associated with the lifetime extended service plans over a
10
-year period as disclosed in Note
1
.
|
|
•
|
Additional depreciation and amortization expenses that would have been recognized assuming fair value adjustments to the existing Zale Corporation assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including intangible assets, favorable and unfavorable leases, and unfavorable contracts and expense associated with the fair value step-up of inventory acquired.
|
|
•
|
Tax impact of the Company’s amended capital structure as a result of the Acquisition and related issuance of
$1,400.0 million
of long-term debt.
|
|
•
|
Adjustment of valuation allowances associated with US and Canadian deferred tax assets, including net operating loss carryforwards.
|
|
•
|
Exclusion of acquisition-related costs of
$58.0 million
, which were included in the Company’s results of operations for the year ended January 31, 2015, respectively. Also excluded were costs associated with the unsecured bridge facility discussed in Note
20
of
$4.0 million
, which were expensed in Fiscal 2015. All amounts were reported within the Other segment.
|
The unaudited pro forma results do not reflect future events that either have occurred or may occur after the Acquisition, including, but not limited to, the anticipated realization of expected operating synergies in subsequent periods. They also do not give effect to acquisition-related costs that the Company expects to incur in connection with the Acquisition, including, but not limited to, additional professional fees, employee integration, retention and severance costs.
4
. Segment information
Financial information for each of Signet’s reportable segments is presented in the tables below. Signet’s chief operating decision maker utilizes sales and operating income, after the elimination of any inter-segment transactions, to determine resource allocations and performance assessment measures. Signet’s sales are derived from the retailing of jewelry, watches, other products and services as generated through the management of its
five
reportable segments: the Sterling Jewelers division, the Zale division, which consists of the Zale Jewelry and Piercing Pagoda segments, the UK Jewelry division and Other.
The Sterling Jewelers division operates in all
50
US states. Its stores operate nationally in malls and off-mall locations principally as Kay Jewelers (“Kay”), Kay Jewelers Outlet, Jared The Galleria Of Jewelry (“Jared”) and Jared Vault. The division also operates a variety of mall-based regional brands.
The Zale division operates jewelry stores (Zale Jewelry) and kiosks (Piercing Pagoda), located primarily in shopping malls throughout the US, Canada and Puerto Rico. Zale Jewelry includes the US store brand Zales (Zales Jewelers and Zales Outlet), which operates in all
50
US states, and the Canadian store brand Peoples Jewellers, which operates in nine provinces. The division also operates regional brands Gordon’s Jewelers and Mappins. Piercing Pagoda operates through mall-based kiosks.
The UK Jewelry division operates stores in the UK, Republic of Ireland and Channel Islands. Its stores operate in shopping malls and off-mall locations (i.e. high street) principally as H.Samuel and Ernest Jones.
The Other reportable segment consists of all non-reportable segments, including subsidiaries involved in the purchasing and conversion of rough diamonds to polished stones, that are below the quantifiable threshold for separate disclosure as a reportable segment and unallocated corporate administrative functions.
94
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
$
|
3,930.4
|
|
|
$
|
3,988.7
|
|
|
$
|
3,765.0
|
|
|
Zale Jewelry
(1)
|
1,549.7
|
|
|
1,568.2
|
|
|
1,068.7
|
|
|||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
263.1
|
|
|
243.2
|
|
|
146.9
|
|
|||
|
UK Jewelry
|
647.1
|
|
|
737.6
|
|
|
743.6
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
18.1
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|||
|
Total sales
|
$
|
6,408.4
|
|
|
$
|
6,550.2
|
|
|
$
|
5,736.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
$
|
715.8
|
|
|
$
|
718.6
|
|
|
$
|
624.3
|
|
|
Zale Jewelry
(2)
|
62.2
|
|
|
44.3
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|||
|
Piercing Pagoda
(3)
|
11.2
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|||
|
UK Jewelry
|
45.6
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
52.2
|
|
|||
|
Other
(4)
|
(71.6
|
)
|
|
(128.5
|
)
|
|
(91.7
|
)
|
|||
|
Total operating income
|
$
|
763.2
|
|
|
$
|
703.7
|
|
|
$
|
576.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
$
|
112.7
|
|
|
$
|
106.2
|
|
|
$
|
95.7
|
|
|
Zale Jewelry
|
49.1
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
29.4
|
|
|||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
4.6
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|||
|
UK Jewelry
|
21.6
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
0.8
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|||
|
Total depreciation and amortization
|
$
|
188.8
|
|
|
$
|
175.3
|
|
|
$
|
149.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Capital additions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
$
|
154.5
|
|
|
$
|
141.6
|
|
|
$
|
157.6
|
|
|
Zale Jewelry
|
85.0
|
|
|
47.7
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
|||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
12.7
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|||
|
UK Jewelry
|
25.7
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
0.1
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|||
|
Total capital additions
|
$
|
278.0
|
|
|
$
|
226.5
|
|
|
$
|
220.2
|
|
(1)
Includes sales of
$234.6 million
,
$248.7 million
and
$205.5 million
generated by Canadian operations in
Fiscal 2017
,
Fiscal 2016
and
Fiscal 2015
, respectively.
|
(2)
|
Includes net operating loss of
$16.4 million
,
$23.1 million
and
$35.1 million
related to the effects of purchase accounting associated with the acquisition of Zale Corporation for
Fiscal 2017
,
Fiscal 2016
and
Fiscal 2015
, respectively. See Note 3 for additional information.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes net operating loss of
$0.4 million
,
$3.3 million
and
$10.8 million
related to the effects of purchase accounting associated with the acquisition of Zale Corporation for
Fiscal 2017
,
Fiscal 2016
and
Fiscal 2015
, respectively. See Note 3 for additional information.
|
|
(4)
|
For
Fiscal 2017
, Other includes
$28.4 million
of integration costs for consulting expenses associated with information technology (“IT”) implementations, severance related to organizational changes and and expenses associated with the settlement of miscellaneous legal matters pending as of the date of the Zale acquisition. For
Fiscal 2016
, Other includes
$78.9 million
of transaction and integration costs primarily attributable to the impact of the appraisal rights legal settlement discussed in Note
25
and expenses associated with legal, tax, accounting, IT implementations and consulting services, as well as severance costs. For
Fiscal 2015
, Other includes
$59.8 million
of transaction and integration expenses associated with legal, tax, accounting, IT implementations and consulting services, as well as severance costs related to Zale and other management changes.
|
95
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
$
|
4,015.4
|
|
|
$
|
3,788.0
|
|
|
Zale Jewelry
|
1,940.7
|
|
|
1,955.1
|
|
||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
141.6
|
|
|
141.8
|
|
||
|
UK Jewelry
|
372.6
|
|
|
427.8
|
|
||
|
Other
|
127.5
|
|
|
152.2
|
|
||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
6,597.8
|
|
|
$
|
6,464.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
$
|
567.3
|
|
|
$
|
519.7
|
|
|
Zale Jewelry
|
1,050.1
|
|
|
1,013.7
|
|
||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
61.4
|
|
|
53.3
|
|
||
|
UK Jewelry
|
70.7
|
|
|
75.3
|
|
||
|
Other
|
8.0
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
||
|
Total long-lived assets
|
$
|
1,757.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,670.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total liabilities:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Sterling Jewelers
|
$
|
2,061.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,982.2
|
|
|
Zale Jewelry
|
524.3
|
|
|
530.3
|
|
||
|
Piercing Pagoda
|
28.2
|
|
|
28.5
|
|
||
|
UK Jewelry
|
110.6
|
|
|
132.0
|
|
||
|
Other
|
771.2
|
|
|
731.2
|
|
||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
3,495.7
|
|
|
$
|
3,404.2
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Sales by product:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Diamonds and diamond jewelry
|
$
|
3,853.7
|
|
|
$
|
3,918.1
|
|
|
$
|
3,450.6
|
|
|
Gold, silver jewelry, other products and services
|
2,090.0
|
|
|
2,116.4
|
|
|
1,784.5
|
|
|||
|
Watches
|
464.7
|
|
|
515.7
|
|
|
501.2
|
|
|||
|
Total sales
|
$
|
6,408.4
|
|
|
$
|
6,550.2
|
|
|
$
|
5,736.3
|
|
5
. Redeemable preferred shares
On
October 5, 2016
, the Company issued
625,000
preferred shares to Green Equity Investors VI, L.P., Green Equity Investors Side VI, L.P., LGP Associates VI-A LLC and LGP Associates VI-B LLC, all affiliates of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P., (together, the “Investors”) for an aggregate purchase price of
$625.0 million
, or
$1,000
per share (the “Stated Value”) pursuant to the investment agreement dated August 24, 2016. In connection with the issuance of the preferred shares, the Company incurred direct and incremental expenses of
$13.7 million
, including financial advisory fees, closing costs, legal expenses and other offering-related expenses. These direct and incremental expenses originally reduced the preferred shares carrying value, and are accreted through retained earnings as a deemed dividend from the date of issuance through the first possible known redemption date, November 2024. Accretion relating to these fees of
$0.6 million
was recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as of
January 28, 2017
.
96
Dividend rights:
The preferred shares rank senior to the Company’s common shares, with respect to dividend rights and rights on the distribution of assets on any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company. The liquidation preference for preferred shares is equal to the greater of (a) the Stated Value per share, plus all accrued but unpaid dividends and (b) the consideration holders would have received if preferred shares were converted into common shares immediately prior to the liquidation. As of
January 28, 2017
, the liquidation preference was
$636.3 million
. Preferred shareholders are entitled to a cumulative dividend at the rate of
5%
per annum, payable quarterly in arrears, commencing on February 15, 2017, either in cash or by increasing the Stated Value at the option of the Company. In addition, preferred shareholders were entitled to receive dividends or distributions declared or paid on common shares on an as-converted basis, other than the Company’s regularly declared quarterly cash dividends not in excess of
130%
of the arithmetic average of the regular, quarterly cash dividends per common share, if any, declared by the Company during the preceding four calendar quarters.
On November 2, 2016, the Board of Directors approved certain changes to the rights of the preferred shareholders, including the following: (a) elimination of the right of preferred shareholders to receive dividends or other distributions declared on the Company’s common shares and inclusion of adjustments to the conversion rate in the event of any dividend, distribution, spin-off or certain other events or transactions in respect of the common shares; and (b) addition of a requirement for approval by the holders of the majority of the issued preferred shares for the declaration or payment by the Company of any dividends or other distributions on the common shares other than (i) regularly declared quarterly cash dividends paid on the issued common shares in any calendar quarter in an amount per share that is not more than
130%
of the arithmetic average of the regular, quarterly cash dividends per common share, if any, declared by the Company during the preceding four calendar quarters for such quarter and (ii) any dividends or other distributions which are paid or distributed at the same time on the common shares and the preferred shares, provided that the amount paid or distributed to the preferred shares is based on the number of common shares into which such preferred shares could be converted on the applicable record date for such dividends or other distributions.
Conversion features:
Preferred shares are convertible at the option of the holders at any time into common shares at the then applicable conversion rate. The conversion rate of
10.6529
common shares per preferred share was established as the Stated Value divided by the defined conversion price of
$93.8712
. As of
January 28, 2017
, the maximum number of common shares that could be required to be issued if converted was
6.7 million
shares. The conversion rate is subject to certain anti-dilution and other adjustments, including stock split / reverse stock split transactions, regular dividends declared on common shares, share repurchases (excluding amounts through open market transactions or accelerated share repurchases) and issuances of common shares or other securities convertible into common shares. The initial issuance did not include a beneficial conversion feature as the conversion price used to set the conversion ratio at the time of issuance was greater than the Company’s common stock price.
At any time on or after October 5, 2018, all or a portion of outstanding preferred shares are convertible at the option of the Company if the closing price of common shares exceeds
175%
of the then applicable conversion price for at least
20
consecutive trading days.
Redemption rights:
At any time after November 15, 2024, the Company will have the right to redeem any or all, and the holders of the preferred shares will have the right to require the Company to repurchase any or all, of the preferred shares for cash at a price equal to the Stated Value plus all accrued but unpaid dividends. Upon certain change of control or delisting events involving the Company, preferred shareholders can require the Company to repurchase, subject to certain exceptions, all or any portion of its preferred shares at (a) an amount in cash equal to
101%
of the Stated Value plus all accrued but unpaid dividends or (b) the consideration the holders would have received if they had converted their preferred shares into common shares immediately prior to the change of control event.
Voting rights:
Preferred shareholders are entitled to vote with the holders of common shares on an as-converted basis. Holders of preferred shares are entitled to a separate class vote with respect to certain designee(s) for election to the Company’s Board of Directors, amendments to the Company’s organizational documents that have an adverse effect on the preferred shareholders and issuances by the Company of securities that are senior to, or equal in priority with, the preferred shares.
Registration rights:
Preferred shareholders have certain customary registration rights with respect to the preferred shares and the shares of common shares into which they are converted, pursuant to the terms of a registration rights agreement.
6
. Common shares, treasury shares, reserves and dividends
Common shares
The par value of each Common Share is
18 cent
s. The consideration received for common shares relating to options issued during
Fiscal 2017
was
$2.1 million
(
Fiscal 2016
:
$5.0 million
;
Fiscal 2015
:
$6.1 million
).
Treasury shares
Signet may from time to time repurchase common shares under various share repurchase programs authorized by Signet’s Board. Repurchases may be made in the open market, through block trades, accelerated share repurchase agreements or otherwise. The timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchases will be determined by the Company at its discretion, and will be subject to economic and market conditions, stock prices, applicable legal requirements and other factors. The repurchase programs are funded through Signet’s existing cash reserves and liquidity sources. Repurchased shares are held as treasury shares and may be used by Signet for general corporate purposes.
97
Treasury shares represent the cost of shares that the Company purchased in the market under the applicable authorized repurchase program, shares forfeited under the Omnibus Incentive Plan and those previously held by the Employee Stock Ownership Trust (“ESOT”) to satisfy options under the Company’s share option plans.
In February 2016, the Board authorized the repurchase of Signet’s common shares up to
$750.0 million
(the “2016 Program”). In August 2016, the Board increased its authorized share repurchase program by
$625.0 million
, bringing the total authorization for the 2016 Program to
$1,375.0 million
. The 2016 Program may be suspended or discontinued at any time without notice.
On October 5, 2016, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement (“ASR”) with a large financial institution to repurchase
$525.0 million
of the Company’s common shares. At inception, the Company paid
$525.0 million
to the financial institution and took delivery of
4.7 million
shares with an initial estimated cost of
$367.5 million
. In December 2016, the ASR was finalized and the Company received an additional
1.3 million
shares. Total shares repurchased under the ASR were
6.0 million
shares at an average purchase price of
$87.01
per share based on the volume-weighted average price of the Company’s common shares traded during the pricing period, less an agreed discount.
The Company reflected shares delivered as treasury shares as of the date the shares were physically delivered in computing the weighted average common shares outstanding for both basic and diluted earnings per share. The ASR was accounted for as a treasury stock transaction and a forward stock purchase contract. The forward stock purchase contract was determined to be indexed to the Company’s own stock and met all of the applicable criteria for equity classification.
During
Fiscal 2017
, the Company also repurchased
5.2 million
common shares through open market transactions for a total cost of
$475.0 million
. The share repurchase activity is outlined in the table below:
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions, expect per share amounts)
|
Amount
authorized |
|
Shares
repurchased |
|
Amount
repurchased |
|
Average
repurchase price per share |
|
Shares
repurchased |
|
Amount
repurchased |
|
Average
repurchase price per share |
|
Shares
repurchased |
|
Amount
repurchased |
|
Average
repurchase price per share |
|||||||||||||||||
|
2016 Program
(1)
|
$
|
1,375.0
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
$
|
864.4
|
|
|
$
|
86.40
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
||||
|
2013 Program
(2)
|
$
|
350.0
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
135.6
|
|
|
$
|
111.26
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
130.0
|
|
|
$
|
127.63
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
29.8
|
|
|
$
|
103.37
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,000.0
|
|
|
$
|
89.10
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
130.0
|
|
|
$
|
127.63
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
29.8
|
|
|
$
|
103.37
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
The 2016 Program had
$510.6 million
remaining as of
January 28, 2017
.
|
|
(2)
|
The 2013 Program was completed in May 2016.
|
|
n/a
|
Not applicable.
|
Shares held in treasury by the Company as of
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
were
18.9 million
and
7.8 million
, respectively. Shares were reissued in the amounts of
0.1 million
and
0.2 million
, net of taxes and forfeitures, in
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively, to satisfy awards outstanding under existing share-based compensation plans.
Dividends on common shares
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
Cash dividend
per share |
|
Total
dividends |
|
Cash dividend
per share |
|
Total
dividends |
|
Cash dividend
per share |
|
Total
dividends |
||||||||||||
|
First quarter
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
14.4
|
|
|
Second quarter
|
0.26
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
||||||
|
Third quarter
|
0.26
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
||||||
|
Fourth quarter
|
0.26
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
(1)
|
0.22
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
(1)
|
0.18
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
75.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
70.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
57.7
|
|
|
(1)
|
Signet’s dividend policy results in the dividend payment date being a quarter in arrears from the declaration date. As a result, as of
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
,
$17.7 million
and
$17.5 million
, respectively, has been recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets reflecting the cash dividends declared for the fourth quarter of
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively.
|
In addition, on
March 9, 2017
, Signet’s Board declared a quarterly dividend of
$0.31
per share on its common shares. This dividend will be payable on
May 31, 2017
to shareholders of record on
April 28, 2017
, with an ex-dividend date of
April 26, 2017
.
Dividends on preferred shares
As of
January 28, 2017
, dividends on preferred shares totaling
$11.3 million
were declared and accrued for by the Company. As disclosed in the consolidated income statements, there were
no
cumulative undeclared dividends on the preferred shares that reduced net income attributable to common shareholders. In addition, a
$0.6 million
deemed dividend related to accretion of issuance costs associated with the preferred shares was recognized in
Fiscal 2017
.
98
These direct and incremental expenses originally reduced the preferred shares carrying value, and are accreted through retained earnings as a deemed dividend from the date of issuance through the first possible known redemption date, November 2024. Accretion relating to these fees of
$0.6 million
was recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as of
January 28, 2017
.
Other
As of
January 28, 2017
, the principal trading market for the Company’s common shares is the New York Stock Exchange (symbol: SIG). The Company also maintained a standard listing of its common shares on the London Stock Exchange (“LSE”) (symbol: SIG) during Fiscal 2016. On February 16, 2016, the Company filed a voluntary application with the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority to delist its common shares from the LSE. Common shares of the Company continued to trade on the LSE until close of business on March 15, 2016.
7
. Earnings per common share (“EPS”)
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The computation of basic EPS is outlined in the table below:
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
531.3
|
|
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
74.5
|
|
|
79.5
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
|||
|
EPS – basic
|
$
|
7.13
|
|
|
$
|
5.89
|
|
|
$
|
4.77
|
|
The dilutive effect of share awards represents the potential impact of outstanding awards issued under the Company’s share-based compensation plans, including restricted shares and restricted stock units issued under the Omnibus Plan and stock options issued under the Share Saving Plans and Executive Plans. The dilutive effect of preferred shares represents the potential impact for common shares that would be issued upon conversion. Potential common share dilution related to share awards and preferred shares is determined using the treasury stock and if-converted methods, respectively. Under the if-converted method, the preferred shares are assumed to be converted at the beginning of the period, and the resulting common shares are included in the denominator of the diluted EPS calculation for the entire period being presented. Additionally, cumulative dividends and accretion for issuance costs associated with the preferred shares are added back to net income attributable to common shareholders. See Note
5
for additional discussion of the Company’s preferred shares. The computation of diluted EPS is outlined in the table below:
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
531.3
|
|
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
|
Add: Dividends on preferred shares
|
11.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Numerator for diluted EPS
|
$
|
543.2
|
|
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
74.5
|
|
|
79.5
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
|||
|
Plus: Dilutive effect of share awards
|
0.1
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|||
|
Plus: Dilutive effect of preferred shares
|
2.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
76.7
|
|
|
79.7
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
EPS – diluted
|
$
|
7.08
|
|
|
$
|
5.87
|
|
|
$
|
4.75
|
|
The calculation of diluted EPS excludes the following share awards on the basis that their effect would be anti-dilutive.
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||
|
Share awards
|
0.1
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
—
|
|
99
8
. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
The following tables present the changes in AOCI by component and the reclassifications out of AOCI, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plan
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
Foreign
currency translation |
|
Losses on available-for-sale securities, net
|
|
Gains (losses)
on cash flow hedges |
|
Actuarial
gains (losses) |
|
Prior
service credits (costs) |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income |
||||||||||||
|
Balance at February 1, 2014
|
$
|
(137.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(14.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(42.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.3
|
|
|
$
|
(178.5
|
)
|
|
OCI before reclassifications
|
(60.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
(70.9
|
)
|
||||||
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to net income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
12.8
|
|
||||||
|
Net current period OCI
|
(60.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
(58.1
|
)
|
||||||
|
Balance at January 31, 2015
|
$
|
(197.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
(56.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
13.3
|
|
|
$
|
(236.6
|
)
|
|
OCI before reclassifications
|
(40.2
|
)
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
(42.0
|
)
|
||||||
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to net income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
4.5
|
|
||||||
|
Net current period OCI
|
(40.2
|
)
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
(37.5
|
)
|
||||||
|
Balance at January 30, 2016
|
$
|
(237.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
11.1
|
|
|
$
|
(274.1
|
)
|
|
OCI before reclassifications
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
(32.7
|
)
|
||||||
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to net income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net current period OCI
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
(33.6
|
)
|
||||||
|
Balance at January 28, 2017
|
$
|
(263.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
(55.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
|
$
|
(307.7
|
)
|
The amounts reclassified from AOCI were as follows:
|
|
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
Income statement caption
|
|||||||
|
(Gains) losses on cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
$
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
Cost of sales (see Note 17)
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Interest expense, net (see Note 17)
|
||||
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
Cost of sales (see Note 17)
|
||||
|
Total before income tax
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Income taxes
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
||||
|
Net of tax
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Defined benefit pension plan items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(1)
|
||||
|
Amortization of unrecognized net prior service credits
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(1)
|
||||
|
Total before income tax
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Income taxes
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Net of tax
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Total reclassifications, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
$
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
These items are included in the computation of net periodic pension benefit (cost). See Note
19
for additional information.
|
100
9
. Income taxes
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Income before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
– US
|
$
|
424.0
|
|
|
$
|
426.1
|
|
|
$
|
380.8
|
|
|
– Foreign
|
289.8
|
|
|
231.7
|
|
|
159.8
|
|
|||
|
Total income before income taxes
|
$
|
713.8
|
|
|
$
|
657.8
|
|
|
$
|
540.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Current taxation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
– US
|
$
|
137.6
|
|
|
$
|
161.7
|
|
|
$
|
199.5
|
|
|
– Foreign
|
3.9
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|||
|
Deferred taxation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
– US
|
28.1
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
(47.9
|
)
|
|||
|
– Foreign
|
1.0
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|||
|
Total income taxes
|
$
|
170.6
|
|
|
$
|
189.9
|
|
|
$
|
159.3
|
|
As the statutory rate of corporation tax in Bermuda is
0%
, the differences between the US federal income tax rate and the effective tax rates for Signet have been presented below:
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|||
|
US federal income tax rates
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
US state income taxes
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
Differences between US federal and foreign statutory income tax rates
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
Expenditures permanently disallowable for tax purposes, net of permanent tax benefits
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
Disallowable transaction costs
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
Impact of global reinsurance arrangements
|
(5.4
|
)%
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
Impact of global financing arrangements
|
(8.2
|
)%
|
|
(8.7
|
)%
|
|
(7.2
|
)%
|
|
Other items
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
In
Fiscal 2017
, Signet’s effective tax rate was lower than the US federal income tax rate primarily due to the impact of Signet’s global reinsurance and financing arrangements utilized to fund the acquisition of Zale. Signet’s future effective tax rate is dependent on changes in the geographic mix of income.
101
Deferred taxes
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consisted of the following:
|
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
Assets
|
|
(Liabilities)
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets
|
|
(Liabilities)
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
|
Intangible assets
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(160.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(160.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(156.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(156.2
|
)
|
|
US property, plant and equipment
|
—
|
|
|
(86.2
|
)
|
|
(86.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(73.6
|
)
|
|
(73.6
|
)
|
||||||
|
Foreign property, plant and equipment
|
5.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
||||||
|
Inventory valuation
|
—
|
|
|
(289.4
|
)
|
|
(289.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(252.8
|
)
|
|
(252.8
|
)
|
||||||
|
Allowances for doubtful accounts
|
60.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
60.4
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
||||||
|
Revenue deferral
|
216.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
216.0
|
|
|
188.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
188.5
|
|
||||||
|
Derivative instruments
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
||||||
|
Straight-line lease payments
|
37.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred compensation
|
16.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
||||||
|
Retirement benefit obligations
|
—
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(10.3
|
)
|
|
(10.3
|
)
|
||||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
5.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
||||||
|
Other temporary differences
|
51.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
||||||
|
Net operating losses and foreign tax credits
|
69.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
69.2
|
|
|
80.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
80.6
|
|
||||||
|
Value of foreign capital losses
|
11.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
||||||
|
Total gross deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
$
|
472.6
|
|
|
$
|
(541.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(69.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
452.3
|
|
|
$
|
(492.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40.6
|
)
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
(31.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(31.5
|
)
|
|
(31.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(31.9
|
)
|
||||||
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
$
|
441.1
|
|
|
$
|
(541.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(100.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
420.4
|
|
|
$
|
(492.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(72.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Disclosed as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
(101.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72.5
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(100.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(72.5
|
)
|
||||||||
As of
January 28, 2017
, Signet had deferred tax assets associated with net operating loss carry forwards of
$43.8 million
, which are subject to ownership change limitations rules under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) and various US state regulations, and expire between 2017 and 2033. Deferred tax assets associated with foreign tax credits also subject to Section 382 of the IRC total
$13.7 million
as of
January 28, 2017
, which expire between 2017 and 2024 and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of
$11.7 million
, which expire between 2018 and 2037. Additionally, Signet had foreign capital loss carry forward deferred tax assets of
$11.3 million
(
Fiscal 2016
:
$13.4 million
), which are only available to offset future capital gains, if any, over an indefinite period.
The decrease in the total valuation allowance in
Fiscal 2017
was
$0.4 million
(
Fiscal 2016
:
$0.5 million
net decrease;
Fiscal 2015
:
$7.5 million
net increase). The valuation allowance primarily relates to foreign capital and trading loss carry forwards, foreign tax credits and net operating losses that, in the judgment of management, are not more likely than not to be realized.
Signet believes that it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets not subject to a valuation allowance as of
January 28, 2017
will be offset where permissible by deferred tax liabilities or realized on future tax returns, primarily from the generation of future taxable income.
102
Uncertain tax positions
The following table summarizes the activity related to the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits for US federal, US state and non-US tax jurisdictions:
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of period
|
$
|
11.4
|
|
|
$
|
11.4
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
Acquired existing unrecognized tax benefits
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|||
|
Increases related to current year tax positions
|
2.4
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|||
|
Prior year tax positions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Increases
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Decreases
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|||
|
Cash settlements
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|||
|
Difference on foreign currency translation
|
0.1
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|||
|
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of period
|
$
|
12.0
|
|
|
$
|
11.4
|
|
|
$
|
11.4
|
|
As of
January 28, 2017
, Signet had approximately
$12.0 million
of unrecognized tax benefits in respect to uncertain tax positions. The unrecognized tax benefits relate primarily to financing arrangements and intra-group charges which are subject to different and changing interpretations of tax law. If all of these unrecognized tax benefits were settled in Signet’s favor, the effective income tax rate would be favorably impacted by
$11.6 million
.
Signet recognizes accrued interest and, where appropriate, penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense. As of
January 28, 2017
, Signet had accrued interest of
$3.1 million
and
$0.7 million
of accrued penalties.
Over the next twelve months management believes that it is reasonably possible that there could be a reduction of some or all of the unrecognized tax benefits as of
January 28, 2017
due to settlement of the uncertain tax positions with the tax authorities.
Signet has business activity in all states within the US and files income tax returns for the US federal jurisdiction and all applicable states. Signet also files income tax returns in the UK, Canada and certain other foreign jurisdictions. Signet is subject to examinations by the US federal and state and Canadian tax authorities for tax years ending after November 1, 2011 and is subject to examination by the UK tax authority for tax years ending after February 1, 2014.
10
. Other operating income, net
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Interest income from in-house customer finance programs
|
$
|
282.5
|
|
|
$
|
252.6
|
|
|
$
|
217.9
|
|
|
Other
|
0.1
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|||
|
Other operating income, net
|
$
|
282.6
|
|
|
$
|
250.9
|
|
|
$
|
215.3
|
|
11
. Accounts receivable, net
Signet’s accounts receivable primarily consist of US customer in-house financing receivables. The accounts receivable portfolio consists of a population that is of similar characteristics and is evaluated collectively for impairment.
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Accounts receivable by portfolio segment, net:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Sterling Jewelers customer in-house finance receivables
|
$
|
1,813.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,725.9
|
|
|
Zale customer in-house finance receivables
|
33.4
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
||
|
Other accounts receivable
|
11.3
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
||
|
Total accounts receivable, net
|
$
|
1,858.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,756.4
|
|
Signet grants credit to customers based on a variety of credit quality indicators, including consumer financial information and prior payment experience. On an ongoing basis, management monitors the credit exposure based on past due status and collection experience, as it has found a meaningful correlation between the past due status of customers and the risk of loss.
103
During the third quarter of Fiscal 2016, Signet implemented a program to provide in-house credit to customers in the Zale division’s US locations (“second look”). The allowance for credit losses associated with Zale customer in-house finance receivables was immaterial as of
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
.
Other accounts receivable is comprised primarily of accounts receivable relating to the insurance loss replacement business in the UK Jewelry division of
$11.0 million
(
Fiscal 2016
:
$13.6 million
).
Sterling Jewelers customer in-house finance receivables
The allowance for credit losses on Sterling Jewelers customer in-house finance receivables is shown below:
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Beginning balance:
|
$
|
(130.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(97.8
|
)
|
|
Charge-offs, net
|
203.4
|
|
|
173.6
|
|
|
144.7
|
|
|||
|
Recoveries
|
35.1
|
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|||
|
Provision
|
(247.2
|
)
|
|
(225.8
|
)
|
|
(187.5
|
)
|
|||
|
Ending balance
|
$
|
(138.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(130.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113.1
|
)
|
|
Ending receivable balance evaluated for impairment
|
1,952.0
|
|
|
1,855.9
|
|
|
1,666.0
|
|
|||
|
Sterling Jewelers customer in-house finance receivables, net
|
$
|
1,813.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,725.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,552.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net bad debt expense is defined as the provision expense less recoveries.
The credit quality indicator and age analysis of Sterling Jewelers customer in-house finance receivables are shown below:
|
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
|
January 31, 2015
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
Gross
|
|
Valuation
allowance |
|
Gross
|
|
Valuation
allowance |
|
Gross
|
|
Valuation
allowance |
||||||||||||
|
Performing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Current, aged 0 – 30 days
|
$
|
1,538.2
|
|
|
$
|
(47.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,473.0
|
|
|
$
|
(45.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,332.2
|
|
|
$
|
(41.1
|
)
|
|
Past due, aged 31 – 60 days
|
282.0
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
259.6
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
230.2
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
||||||
|
Past due, aged 61 – 90 days
|
51.6
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
49.2
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
40.9
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
||||||
|
Non Performing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Past due, aged more than 90 days
|
80.2
|
|
|
(80.2
|
)
|
|
74.1
|
|
|
(74.1
|
)
|
|
62.7
|
|
|
(62.7
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
$
|
1,952.0
|
|
|
$
|
(138.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,855.9
|
|
|
$
|
(130.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,666.0
|
|
|
$
|
(113.1
|
)
|
|
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
|
January 31, 2015
|
||||||||||||
|
(as a % of the ending receivable balance)
|
Gross
|
|
Valuation
allowance |
|
Gross
|
|
Valuation
allowance |
|
Gross
|
|
Valuation
allowance |
||||||
|
Performing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Current, aged 0 – 30 days
|
78.8
|
%
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
79.4
|
%
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
80.0
|
%
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
Past due, aged 31 – 60 days
|
14.5
|
%
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
Past due, aged 61 – 90 days
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
Non Performing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Past due, aged more than 90 days
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
Securitized credit card receivables
The Sterling Jewelers division securitizes its credit card receivables through its Sterling Jewelers Receivables Master Note Trust. See Note
20
for additional information regarding this asset-backed securitization facility.
104
12
. Inventories
Signet held
$574.0 million
of consignment inventory at
January 28, 2017
(
January 30, 2016
:
$441.9 million
), which is not recorded on the balance sheet. The principal terms of the consignment agreements, which can generally be terminated by either party, are such that Signet can return any or all of the inventory to the relevant suppliers without financial or commercial penalties and the supplier can adjust the inventory prices prior to sale.
The following table summarizes the details of the Company’s inventory:
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Raw materials
|
$
|
60.8
|
|
|
$
|
81.8
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
2,388.5
|
|
|
2,372.1
|
|
||
|
Total inventories
|
$
|
2,449.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,453.9
|
|
Inventory reserves
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Inventory reserve, beginning of period
|
$
|
43.2
|
|
|
$
|
28.4
|
|
|
$
|
16.3
|
|
|
Charged to profit
|
57.3
|
|
|
87.6
|
|
|
44.6
|
|
|||
|
Utilization
(1)
|
(57.3
|
)
|
|
(72.8
|
)
|
|
(32.5
|
)
|
|||
|
Inventory reserve, end of period
|
$
|
43.2
|
|
|
$
|
43.2
|
|
|
$
|
28.4
|
|
(1)
Includes the impact of foreign exchange translation between opening and closing balance sheet dates.
13
. Property, plant and equipment, net
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Land and buildings
|
$
|
33.5
|
|
|
$
|
34.7
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
632.4
|
|
|
591.7
|
|
||
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
761.0
|
|
|
688.7
|
|
||
|
Equipment
|
137.7
|
|
|
133.6
|
|
||
|
Software
|
211.0
|
|
|
181.9
|
|
||
|
Construction in progress
|
96.7
|
|
|
46.2
|
|
||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,872.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,676.8
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(1,049.4
|
)
|
|
(949.2
|
)
|
||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
$
|
822.9
|
|
|
$
|
727.6
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense for
Fiscal 2017
was
$175.0 million
(
Fiscal 2016
:
$161.4 million
;
Fiscal 2015
:
$140.1 million
). The expense for
Fiscal 2017
includes
$1.3 million
(
Fiscal 2016
:
$0.7 million
;
Fiscal 2015
:
$0.8 million
) for the impairment of assets.
14
. Goodwill and intangibles
Goodwill
The following table summarizes the Company’s goodwill by reportable segment:
|
(in millions)
|
Sterling
Jewelers |
|
Zale
Jewelry |
|
Piercing
Pagoda |
|
UK Jewelry
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance at January 31, 2015
|
$
|
23.2
|
|
|
$
|
492.4
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
519.2
|
|
|
Impact of foreign exchange
|
—
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
||||||
|
Balance at January 30, 2016
|
$
|
23.2
|
|
|
$
|
488.7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
515.5
|
|
|
Impact of foreign exchange
|
—
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
||||||
|
Balance at January 28, 2017
|
$
|
23.2
|
|
|
$
|
490.8
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
517.6
|
|
There have been
no
goodwill impairment losses recognized during
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
. If future economic conditions are different than those projected by management, future impairment charges may be required.
105
Intangibles
Intangible assets with indefinite and definite lives represent Zale trade names and favorable leases acquired, while intangible liabilities with definite lives represent unfavorable leases and contract rights acquired in the Zale Acquisition. See Note
3
for additional information. No other intangible assets or liabilities were recognized prior to the acquisition of Zale Corporation on May 29, 2014. As of
January 28, 2017
, the remaining weighted-average amortization period for acquired definite-lived intangible assets and liabilities was
1.4 years
and
4.8 years
, respectively. The following table provides additional detail regarding the composition of intangible assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
Balance sheet location
|
|
Gross
carrying amount |
|
Accumulated
amortization |
|
Net
carrying amount |
|
Gross
carrying amount |
|
Accumulated
amortization |
|
Net
carrying amount |
||||||||||||
|
Definite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Trade names
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
Favorable leases
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
47.6
|
|
|
(36.0
|
)
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
(22.3
|
)
|
|
24.7
|
|
||||||
|
Total definite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
(36.8
|
)
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
48.4
|
|
|
(22.8
|
)
|
|
25.6
|
|
||||||
|
Indefinite-lived trade names
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
404.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
404.8
|
|
|
402.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
402.2
|
|
||||||
|
Total intangible assets, net
|
|
|
$
|
453.8
|
|
|
$
|
(36.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
417.0
|
|
|
$
|
450.6
|
|
|
$
|
(22.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
427.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Definite-lived intangible liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Unfavorable leases
|
Other liabilities
|
|
$
|
(48.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
38.2
|
|
|
$
|
(10.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
23.7
|
|
|
$
|
(24.0
|
)
|
|
Unfavorable contracts
|
Other liabilities
|
|
(65.6
|
)
|
|
33.5
|
|
|
(32.1
|
)
|
|
(65.6
|
)
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
(37.5
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total intangible liabilities, net
|
|
|
$
|
(113.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
71.7
|
|
|
$
|
(42.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
51.8
|
|
|
$
|
(61.5
|
)
|
Amortization expense relating to intangible assets was
$13.8 million
in
Fiscal 2017
(
Fiscal 2016
:
$13.9 million
;
Fiscal 2015
:
$9.6 million
). Expected future amortization expense for intangible assets recorded at
January 28, 2017
follows:
|
(in millions)
|
Trade names
|
|
Favorable leases
|
|
Total
|
||||||
|
2018
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.0
|
|
|
$
|
9.3
|
|
|
2019
|
0.2
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|||
|
2020
|
0.1
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|||
|
2021
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
2022
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Thereafter
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
11.6
|
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
The unfavorable leases and unfavorable contracts are classified as liabilities and recognized over the term of the underlying lease or contract. Amortization relating to intangible liabilities was
$19.7 million
in
Fiscal 2017
(
Fiscal 2016
:
$28.7 million
;
Fiscal 2015
:
$23.7 million
). Expected future amortization for intangible liabilities recorded at
January 28, 2017
follows:
|
(in millions)
|
Unfavorable leases
|
|
Unfavorable contracts
|
|
Total
|
||||||
|
2018
|
$
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
2019
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|||
|
2020
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|||
|
2021
|
—
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|||
|
2022
|
—
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|||
|
Thereafter
|
—
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
(10.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(42.2
|
)
|
106
15
. Other assets
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Deferred ESP selling costs
|
$
|
86.1
|
|
|
$
|
79.4
|
|
|
Investments
(1)
|
27.2
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
||
|
Other assets
(2)
|
51.8
|
|
|
48.4
|
|
||
|
Total other assets
|
$
|
165.1
|
|
|
$
|
154.6
|
|
|
(1)
|
See Note
16
for additional detail.
|
|
(2)
|
Amounts adjusted to reflect the reclassification of capitalized debt issuance costs in accordance with Signet’s adoption of FASB ASU 2015-03 during the first quarter of Fiscal 2017. See Note
2
for additional information.
|
In addition, other current assets include deferred direct selling costs in relation to the sale of ESP of
$29.4 million
as of
January 28, 2017
(
January 30, 2016
:
$26.4 million
).
16
. Investments
Investments in debt and equity securities are held by certain insurance subsidiaries and are reported at fair value as other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. All investments are classified as available-for-sale and include the following:
|
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
Cost
|
|
Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Cost
|
|
Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||
|
US Treasury securities
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
US government agency securities
|
4.6
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
||||||
|
Corporate bonds and notes
|
11.0
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
||||||
|
Corporate equity securities
|
3.5
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
3.2
|
|
||||||
|
Total investments
|
$
|
27.9
|
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
27.2
|
|
|
$
|
27.5
|
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
26.8
|
|
Realized gains and losses on investments are determined on the specific identification basis. There were no material net realized gains or losses during
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
. Investments with a carrying value of
$6.6 million
and
$7.1 million
were on deposit with various state insurance departments at
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
, respectively, as required by law.
Investments in debt securities outstanding as of
January 28, 2017
mature as follows:
|
(in millions)
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
||||
|
Less than one year
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
Year two through year five
|
13.4
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
||
|
Year six through year ten
|
9.2
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
||
|
After ten years
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Total investment in debt securities
|
$
|
24.4
|
|
|
$
|
23.4
|
|
17
. Derivatives
Derivative transactions are used by Signet for risk management purposes to address risks inherent in Signet’s business operations and sources of financing. The main risks arising from Signet’s operations are market risk including foreign currency risk, commodity risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk. Signet uses derivative financial instruments to manage and mitigate certain of these risks under policies reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors. Signet does not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes.
Market risk
Signet generates revenues and incurs expenses in US dollars, Canadian dollars and British pounds. As a portion of UK Jewelry purchases and purchases made by the Canadian operations of the Zale division are denominated in US dollars, Signet enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts, foreign currency option contracts and foreign currency swaps to manage this exposure to the US dollar.
Signet holds a fluctuating amount of British pounds and Canadian dollars reflecting the cash generative characteristics of operations. Signet’s objective is to minimize net foreign exchange exposure to the income statement on non-US dollar denominated items through managing cash levels, non-US dollar denominated intra-entity balances and foreign currency swaps. In order to manage the foreign exchange exposure and
107
minimize the level of funds denominated in British pounds and Canadian dollars, dividends are paid regularly by subsidiaries to their immediate holding companies and excess British pounds and Canadian dollars are sold in exchange for US dollars.
Signet’s policy is to minimize the impact of precious metal commodity price volatility on operating results through the use of outright forward purchases of, or by entering into options to purchase, precious metals within treasury guidelines approved by the Board of Directors. In particular, Signet undertakes some hedging of its requirements for gold through the use of options, net zero-cost collar arrangements (a combination of call and put option contracts), forward contracts and commodity purchasing, while fluctuations in the cost of diamonds are not hedged.
Liquidity risk
Signet’s objective is to ensure that it has access to, or the ability to generate, sufficient cash from either internal or external sources in a timely and cost-effective manner to meet its commitments as they become due and payable. Signet manages liquidity risks as part of its overall risk management policy. Management produces forecasting and budgeting information that is reviewed and monitored by the Board of Directors. Cash generated from operations and external financing are the main sources of funding, which supplement Signet’s resources in meeting liquidity requirements.
The main external sources of funding are a senior unsecured credit facility, senior unsecured notes and securitized credit card receivables, as described in Note
20
.
Interest rate risk
Signet has exposure to movements in interest rates associated with cash and borrowings. Signet may enter into various interest rate protection agreements in order to limit the impact of movements in interest rates.
Interest rate swap (designated)
— The Company entered into an interest rate swap in March 2015 with an aggregate notional amount of
$300.0 million
that is scheduled to mature through
April 2019
. Under this contract, the Company agrees to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed contract rates and floating rate interest amounts calculated by reference to the agreed notional amounts. This contract was entered into to reduce the consolidated interest rate risk associated with variable rate, long-term debt. The Company designated this derivative as a cash flow hedge of the variability in expected cash outflows for interest payments. The Company has effectively converted a portion of its variable-rate senior unsecured term loan into fixed-rate debt.
The fair value of the swap is presented within the consolidated balance sheets, and the Company recognizes any changes in the fair value as an adjustment of AOCI within equity to the extent the swap is effective. The ineffective portion, if any, is recognized in current period earnings. As interest expense is accrued on the debt obligation, amounts in AOCI related to the interest rate swap are reclassified into income resulting in a net interest expense on the hedged amount of the underlying debt obligation equal to the effective yield of the fixed rate of the swap. In the event that the interest rate swap is dedesignated prior to maturity, gains or losses in AOCI remain deferred and are reclassified into earnings in the periods in which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.
Credit risk and concentrations of credit risk
Credit risk represents the loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed to perform as contracted. Signet does not anticipate non-performance by counterparties of its financial instruments, except for customer in-house financing receivables as disclosed in Note
11
of which no single customer represents a significant portion of the Company’s receivable balance. Signet does not require collateral or other security to support cash investments or financial instruments with credit risk; however, it is Signet’s policy to only hold cash and cash equivalent investments and to transact financial instruments with financial institutions with a certain minimum credit rating. Management does not believe Signet is exposed to any significant concentrations of credit risk that arise from cash and cash equivalent investments, derivatives or accounts receivable.
Commodity and foreign currency risks
The following types of derivative financial instruments are utilized by Signet to mitigate certain risk exposures related to changes in commodity prices and foreign exchange rates:
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts (designated)
— These contracts, which are principally in US dollars, are entered into to limit the impact of movements in foreign exchange rates on forecasted foreign currency purchases. The total notional amount of these foreign currency contracts outstanding as of
January 28, 2017
was
$37.8 million
(
January 30, 2016
:
$10.7 million
). These contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges and will be settled over the next
12 months
(
January 30, 2016
:
6 months
).
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts (undesignated)
— Foreign currency contracts not designated as cash flow hedges are used to limit the impact of movements in foreign exchange rates on recognized foreign currency payables and to hedge currency flows through Signet’s bank accounts to mitigate Signet’s exposure to foreign currency exchange risk in its cash and borrowings. The total notional amount of these foreign currency contracts outstanding as of
January 28, 2017
was
$117.8 million
(
January 30, 2016
:
$32.0 million
).
108
Commodity forward purchase contracts and net zero-cost collar arrangements (designated)
— These contracts are entered into to reduce Signet’s exposure to significant movements in the price of the underlying precious metal raw material. The total notional amount of these commodity derivative contracts outstanding as of
January 28, 2017
was for approximately
94,000 ounces
of gold (
January 30, 2016
:
76,000 ounces
). These contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges and will be settled over the next
12 months
(
January 30, 2016
:
12 months
).
The bank counterparties to the derivative instruments expose Signet to credit-related losses in the event of their non-performance. However, to mitigate that risk, Signet only contracts with counterparties that meet certain minimum requirements under its counterparty risk assessment process. As of
January 28, 2017
, Signet believes that this credit risk did not materially change the fair value of the foreign currency or commodity contracts.
The following table summarizes the fair value and presentation of derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
Fair value of derivative assets
|
||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
Balance sheet location
|
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
Other current assets
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
Other assets
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
Other current assets
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Total derivative assets
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities
|
||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
Balance sheet location
|
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
Other liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
||
|
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
||
|
Total derivative liabilities
|
|
|
$
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.4
|
)
|
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
The following table summarizes the pre-tax gains (losses) recorded in AOCI for derivatives designated in cash flow hedging relationships:
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
0.4
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
||
|
Gains (losses) recorded in AOCI
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
(5.7
|
)
|
The following tables summarize the effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges in OCI and the consolidated income statements:
Foreign currency contracts
|
(in millions)
|
Income statement caption
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||
|
Gains recorded in AOCI, beginning of period
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
Current period gains recognized in OCI
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
||
|
Gains reclassified from AOCI to net income
|
Cost of sales
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
||
|
Gains recorded in AOCI, end of period
|
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
109
Commodity contracts
|
(in millions)
|
Income statement caption
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||
|
(Losses) gains recorded in AOCI, beginning of period
|
|
|
$
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
Current period gains (losses) recognized in OCI
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
||
|
(Gains) losses reclassified from AOCI to net income
|
Cost of sales
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
2.6
|
|
||
|
Losses recorded in AOCI, end of period
|
|
|
$
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.7
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
(in millions)
|
Income statement caption
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||
|
Losses recorded in AOCI, beginning of period
|
|
|
$
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Current period gains (losses) recognized in OCI
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
||
|
Losses reclassified from AOCI to net income
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
||
|
Gains (losses) recorded in AOCI, end of period
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
(3.4
|
)
|
There was no material ineffectiveness related to the Company’s derivative instruments designated in cash flow hedging relationships during
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
. Based on current valuations, the Company expects approximately
$2.3 million
of net pre-tax derivative gains to be reclassified out of AOCI into earnings within the next
12 months
.
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
The following table presents the effects of the Company’s derivatives instruments not designated as cash flow hedges in the consolidated income statements:
|
|
Income statement caption
|
|
Amount of gains (losses) recognized in net income
|
||||||
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
Other operating income, net
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
(4.5
|
)
|
18. Fair value measurement
The estimated fair value of Signet’s financial instruments held or issued to finance Signet’s operations is summarized below. Certain estimates and judgments were required to develop the fair value amounts. The fair value amounts shown below are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that Signet would realize upon disposition nor do they indicate Signet’s intent or ability to dispose of the financial instrument. Assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value are required to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1—quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities
Level 2—observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data
Level 3—unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data
Signet determines fair value based upon quoted prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as discounting the expected cash flows using market interest rates commensurate with the credit quality and duration of the investment. The methods Signet uses to determine fair value on an instrument-specific basis are detailed below:
110
|
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets (Level 1) |
|
Significant
other observable inputs (Level 2) |
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets (Level 1) |
|
Significant
other observable inputs (Level 2) |
||||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
US Treasury securities
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Corporate equity securities
|
3.8
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
3.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
||||||
|
Commodity contracts
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
||||||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
0.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
US government agency securities
|
4.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
||||||
|
Corporate bonds and notes
|
10.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
30.8
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
|
$
|
28.2
|
|
|
$
|
12.0
|
|
|
$
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
||||||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(4.4
|
)
|
Investments in US Treasury securities and corporate equity securities are based on quoted market prices for identical instruments in active markets, and therefore were classified as Level 1 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. Investments in US government agency securities and corporate bonds and notes are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, and therefore were classified as Level 2 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. See Note
16
for additional information related to the Company’s available-for-sale investments. The fair values of derivative financial instruments have been determined based on market value equivalents at the balance sheet date, taking into account the current interest rate environment, foreign currency forward rates or commodity forward rates, and therefore were classified as Level 2 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. See Note
17
for additional information related to the Company’s derivatives.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses, other liabilities, income taxes and the revolving credit facility approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these amounts.
The fair values of long-term debt instruments were determined using quoted market prices in inactive markets or discounted cash flows based upon current observable market interest rates and therefore were classified as Level 2 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. See Note
20
for classification between current and long-term debt. The carrying amount and fair value of outstanding debt at
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
were as follows:
|
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
Carrying
Value |
|
Fair Value
|
|
Carrying
Value |
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Senior notes (Level 2)
|
$
|
393.7
|
|
|
$
|
391.2
|
|
|
$
|
392.8
|
|
|
$
|
405.9
|
|
|
Securitization facility (Level 2)
|
599.7
|
|
|
600.0
|
|
|
599.6
|
|
|
600.0
|
|
||||
|
Term loan (Level 2)
|
345.1
|
|
|
348.6
|
|
|
361.3
|
|
|
365.0
|
|
||||
|
Capital lease obligations (Level 2)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,338.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,339.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,353.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,371.1
|
|
19
.
Pension plans
The UK Plan, which ceased to admit new employees from April 2004, is a funded plan with assets held in a separate trustee administered fund, which is independently managed. Signet used
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
measurement dates in determining the UK Plan’s benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets.
111
The following tables provide information concerning the UK Plan as of and for the fiscal years ended
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
:
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||
|
Change in UK Plan assets:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Fair value at beginning of year
|
$
|
266.2
|
|
|
$
|
295.8
|
|
|
Actual return on UK Plan assets
|
18.2
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
||
|
Employer contributions
|
3.3
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
||
|
Members’ contributions
|
0.6
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
||
|
Benefits paid
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
||
|
Foreign currency translation
|
(30.8
|
)
|
|
(16.8
|
)
|
||
|
Fair value at end of year
|
$
|
247.6
|
|
|
$
|
266.2
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
$
|
214.9
|
|
|
$
|
258.8
|
|
|
Service cost
|
2.0
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
||
|
Past service cost
|
0.5
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
||
|
Interest cost
|
7.2
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
||
|
Members’ contributions
|
0.6
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
||
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
24.1
|
|
|
(29.4
|
)
|
||
|
Benefits paid
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
||
|
Foreign currency translation
|
(23.7
|
)
|
|
(14.9
|
)
|
||
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
$
|
215.7
|
|
|
$
|
214.9
|
|
|
Funded status at end of year
|
$
|
31.9
|
|
|
$
|
51.3
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Amounts recognized in the balance sheet consist of:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Non-current assets
|
$
|
31.9
|
|
|
$
|
51.3
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Net asset recognized
|
$
|
31.9
|
|
|
$
|
51.3
|
|
Items in AOCI not yet recognized as income (expense) in the income statement:
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
|
January 31, 2015
|
||||||
|
Net actuarial losses
|
$
|
(55.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(56.7
|
)
|
|
Net prior service credits
|
9.2
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|||
The estimated actuarial losses and prior service credits for the UK Plan that will be amortized from AOCI into net periodic pension cost over the next fiscal year are
$2.9 million
and
$(1.7) million
, respectively.
The accumulated benefit obligation for the UK Plan was
$208.0 million
and
$204.2 million
as of
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
, respectively.
112
The components of net periodic pension benefit (cost) and other amounts recognized in OCI for the UK Plan are as follows:
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Components of net periodic pension benefit (cost):
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Service cost
|
$
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
Interest cost
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|||
|
Expected return on UK Plan assets
|
10.4
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|||
|
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|||
|
Amortization of unrecognized net prior service credits
|
1.9
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|||
|
Net periodic pension benefit
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
Other changes in assets and benefit obligations recognized in OCI
|
(17.8
|
)
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
(21.0
|
)
|
|||
|
Total recognized in net periodic pension benefit (cost) and OCI
|
$
|
(16.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
14.4
|
|
|
$
|
(18.6
|
)
|
|
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||
|
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations (at the end of the year):
|
|
|
|
||
|
Discount rate
|
2.90
|
%
|
|
3.60
|
%
|
|
Salary increases
|
2.00
|
%
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
Assumptions used to determine net periodic pension costs (at the start of the year):
|
|
|
|
||
|
Discount rate
|
3.60
|
%
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
Expected return on UK Plan assets
|
4.20
|
%
|
|
3.90
|
%
|
|
Salary increases
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
The discount rate is based upon published rates for high-quality fixed-income investments that produce expected cash flows that approximate the timing and amount of expected future benefit payments.
The expected return on the UK Plan assets assumption is based upon the historical return and future expected returns for each asset class, as well as the target asset allocation of the portfolio of UK Plan assets.
The UK Plan’s investment strategy is guided by an objective of achieving a return on the investments, which is consistent with the long-term return assumptions and funding policy, to ensure the UK Plan obligations are met. The investment policy is to allocate funds to a diverse portfolio of investments, including UK and overseas equities, diversified growth funds, UK corporate bonds, open-ended funds and commercial property. The commercial property investment is through a Pooled Pensions Property Fund that provides a diversified portfolio of property assets. As of
January 28, 2017
, the target allocation for the UK Plan’s assets was bonds
53%
, diversified growth funds
34%
, equities
8%
and property
5%
. This allocation is consistent with the long-term target allocation of investments underlying the UK Plan’s funding strategy.
The fair value of the assets in the UK Plan at
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
are required to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1—quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities
Level 2—observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data
Level 3—unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data
113
The methods Signet uses to determine fair value on an instrument-specific basis are detailed below:
|
|
Fair value measurements as of January 28, 2017
|
|
Fair value measurements as of January 30, 2016
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
Total
|
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets (Level 1) |
|
Significant
other observable inputs (Level 2) |
|
Significant
Unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
|
Total
|
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets (Level 1) |
|
Significant
other observable inputs (Level 2) |
|
Significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Asset category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Diversified equity securities
|
$
|
22.3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
22.3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
21.2
|
|
|
$
|
11.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.9
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Diversified growth funds
|
80.9
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
90.5
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
45.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Fixed income – government bonds
|
81.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
81.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
87.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
87.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Fixed income – corporate bonds
|
48.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
48.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
53.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
53.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Property
|
11.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
||||||||
|
Cash
|
3.5
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
247.6
|
|
|
$
|
44.2
|
|
|
$
|
191.6
|
|
|
$
|
11.8
|
|
|
$
|
266.2
|
|
|
$
|
56.9
|
|
|
$
|
196.3
|
|
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
Investments in diversified equity securities, diversified growth funds and fixed income securities are in pooled funds. Investments are valued based on unadjusted quoted prices for each fund in active markets, where possible and, therefore, classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. If unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets are unavailable, investments are valued by the administrators of the funds. The valuation is based on the value of the underlying assets owned by the fund, minus its liabilities, and then divided by the number of units outstanding. The unit price is based on underlying investments which are generally either traded in an active market or are valued based on observable inputs such as market interest rates and quoted prices for similar securities and, therefore, classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The investment in property is in pooled funds valued by the administrators of the fund. The valuation is based on the value of the underlying assets owned by the fund, minus its liabilities and then divided by the number of units outstanding. The unit price is based on underlying investments which are independently valued on a monthly basis. The investment in the property fund is subject to certain restrictions on withdrawals that could delay the receipt of funds by up to 16 months. Property investments are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The table below sets forth changes in the fair value of the Level 3 investment assets in
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
:
|
(in millions)
|
Significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
||
|
Balance as of January 31, 2015
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
|
Actual return on assets
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 30, 2016
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
|
Actual return on assets
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 28, 2017
|
$
|
11.8
|
|
Signet contributed
$3.3 million
to the UK Plan in
Fiscal 2017
and expects to contribute a minimum of
$3.3 million
to the UK Plan in
Fiscal 2018
. The level of contributions is in accordance with an agreed upon deficit recovery plan and based on the results of the actuarial valuation as of April 5, 2015.
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are estimated to be paid by the UK Plan:
|
(in millions)
|
Expected benefit payments
|
||
|
Fiscal 2018
|
$
|
9.7
|
|
|
Fiscal 2019
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2020
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2021
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2022
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
$
|
42.6
|
|
114
In June 2004, Signet introduced a defined contribution plan which replaced the UK Plan for new UK employees. The contributions to this plan in
Fiscal 2017
were
$1.8 million
(
Fiscal 2016
:
$2.0 million
;
Fiscal 2015
:
$1.8 million
).
In the US, Signet operates a defined contribution 401(k) retirement savings plan for all eligible employees who meet minimum age and service requirements. The assets of this plan are held in a separate trust and Signet matches
50%
of up to
6%
of employee elective salary deferrals, subject to statutory limitations. Signet’s contributions to this plan in
Fiscal 2017
were
$14.6 million
(
Fiscal 2016
:
$8.3 million
;
Fiscal 2015
:
$7.6 million
). The Company has also established
two
unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plans, one of which permits certain management and highly compensated employees to elect annually to defer all or a portion of their compensation and earn interest on the deferred amounts (“DCP”) and the other of which is frozen as to new participants and new deferrals. Beginning in April 2011, the DCP provided for a matching contribution based on each participant’s annual compensation deferral. The plan also permits employer contributions on a discretionary basis. In connection with these plans, Signet has invested in trust-owned life insurance policies and money market funds. The cost recognized in connection with the DCP in
Fiscal 2017
was
$4.6 million
(
Fiscal 2016
:
$2.9 million
;
Fiscal 2015
:
$2.6 million
).
The fair value of the assets in the two unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plans at
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
are required to be classified and disclosed. Although these plans are not required to be funded by the Company, the Company may elect to fund the plans. The value and classification of these assets are as follows:
|
|
Fair value measurements as of January 28, 2017
|
|
Fair value measurements as of January 30, 2016
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions)
|
Total
|
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets (Level 1) |
|
Significant
other observable inputs (Level 2) |
|
Total
|
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets (Level 1) |
|
Significant
other observable inputs (Level 2) |
||||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Corporate-owned life insurance plans
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
29.6
|
|
|
29.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
37.1
|
|
|
$
|
29.6
|
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
33.4
|
|
|
$
|
25.1
|
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
20
. Loans, overdrafts and long-term debt
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Senior unsecured notes due 2024, net of unamortized discount
|
$
|
398.8
|
|
|
$
|
398.6
|
|
|
Securitization facility
|
600.0
|
|
|
600.0
|
|
||
|
Senior unsecured term loan
|
348.6
|
|
|
365.0
|
|
||
|
Revolving credit facility
|
56.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Bank overdrafts
|
14.2
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
||
|
Capital lease obligations
|
—
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
||
|
Total debt
|
$
|
1,417.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,388.2
|
|
|
Less: Current portion of loans and overdrafts
|
(91.1
|
)
|
|
(57.7
|
)
|
||
|
Less: Unamortized capitalized debt issuance fees
(1)
|
(8.6
|
)
|
|
(9.5
|
)
|
||
|
Total long-term debt
|
$
|
1,317.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,321.0
|
|
|
(1)
|
Presentation of capitalized debt issuance costs was revised during the first quarter of Fiscal 2017 upon adoption of ASU 2015-03. See Note
2
for additional information.
|
Revolving credit facility and term loan (the “Credit Facility”)
During the second quarter of Fiscal 2017, Signet amended and restated its Credit Facility agreement to (i) increase the borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility from
$400 million
to
$700 million
and extend the maturity date to July 2021 and (ii) extend the maturity date of the term loan facility to July 2021 and revise the scheduled quarterly principal repayments to align with the July 2021 maturity date. The amendment of the Credit Facility was accounted for as a modification of existing debt in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, “Debt Modifications and Extinguishments.”
In connection with the amendment of the revolving credit facility, incremental fees of
$1.4 million
were incurred and capitalized. Capitalized fees associated with the amended revolving credit facility as of
January 28, 2017
total
$2.6 million
with the unamortized balance recorded as an asset within the consolidated balance sheets. Accumulated amortization related to these capitalized fees as of
January 28, 2017
was
$0.8 million
(
January 30, 2016
:
$0.4 million
). Amortization relating to these fees of
$0.4 million
and
$0.3 million
was recorded as interest expense in the consolidated income statements for
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively. As of
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
, the Company had
115
stand-by letters of credit outstanding of
$15.3 million
and
$28.8 million
, respectively, that reduce remaining borrowing availability. The revolving credit facility had a weighted average interest rate of
1.71%
and
1.18%
during
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively.
The senior unsecured term loan had an outstanding principal balance of
$357.5 million
as of the amendment date. Beginning in October 2016, the Company is required to make scheduled quarterly principal payments equal to the amounts per annum of the outstanding principal balance as follows:
5%
in the first year,
7.5%
in the second year,
10%
in the third year,
12.5%
in the fourth year and
15%
in the fifth year after the initial payment date, with the balance due in July 2021. Excluding the impact of the interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge discussed in Note
17
, the term loan had a weighted average interest rate of
1.78%
and
1.48%
during
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively.
In connection with the amendment of the term loan facility, incremental fees of
$0.7 million
were incurred and capitalized. Capitalized fees associated with the amended term loan facility as of
January 28, 2017
total
$6.2 million
with the unamortized balance recorded as a direct deduction from the outstanding liability within the consolidated balance sheets. Accumulated amortization related to these capitalized fees as of
January 28, 2017
was
$2.7 million
(
January 30, 2016
:
$1.8 million
). Amortization relating to these fees of
$0.9 million
and
$1.0 million
was recorded as interest expense in the consolidated income statements
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to an applicable margin, plus, at the Company’s option, either (a) a base rate or (b) a LIBOR rate. The Credit Facility provides that the Company may voluntarily repay outstanding loans at any time without premium or penalty other than reimbursement of the lender’s redeployment and breakage costs in certain cases. In addition, the Credit Facility contains various customary representations and warranties, financial reporting requirements and other affirmative and negative covenants. The Company is required to maintain at all times a leverage ratio of no greater than
2.50
to 1.00 and a fixed charge coverage ratio of no less than
1.40
to 1.00, both determined as of the end of each fiscal quarter for the trailing twelve months.
On February 19, 2014, Signet entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Zale Corporation and concurrently received commitments for an
$800 million
364
-day unsecured bridge facility to finance the transaction. The bridge facility contained customary fees and incurred interest on any borrowings drawn on the facility. In May 2014, Signet executed its Zale Acquisition financing as described in Note 3, replacing the bridge facility commitments in addition to amending its Credit Facility as outlined above, issuing senior unsecured notes and securitizing credit card receivables. No amounts were drawn on the bridge facility commitments prior to replacement by the issuances of long-term debt listed below. Fees of
$4.0 million
relating to this unsecured bridge facility were incurred and capitalized during Fiscal 2015. The capitalized fees of
$4.0 million
were fully expensed in Fiscal 2015.
Senior unsecured notes due 2024
On May 19, 2014, Signet UK Finance plc (“Signet UK Finance”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, issued
$400 million
aggregate principal amount of its
4.700%
senior unsecured notes due in 2024 (the “Notes”). The Notes were issued under an effective registration statement previously filed with the SEC. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing December 15, 2014. The Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed, on a full and unconditional basis, by the Company and by certain of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries (such subsidiaries, the “Guarantors”). See Note
26
for additional information. The Notes were issued pursuant to a base indenture among the Company, Signet UK Finance, the Guarantors and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as trustee, with the indenture containing customary covenants and events of default provisions. The Company received proceeds from the offering of approximately
$393.9 million
, which were net of underwriting discounts, commissions and offering expenses.
Capitalized fees relating to the senior unsecured notes total
$7.0 million
. Accumulated amortization related to these capitalized fees as of
January 28, 2017
was
$1.9 million
(
January 30, 2016
:
$1.2 million
). The remaining unamortized capitalized fees are recorded as a direct deduction from the outstanding liability within the consolidated balance sheets. Amortization relating to these fees of
$0.7 million
and
$0.7 million
was recorded as interest expense in the consolidated income statements for
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively.
Asset-backed securitization facility
The Company sold an undivided interest in certain credit card receivables to Sterling Jewelers Receivables Master Note Trust (the “Issuer”), a wholly-owned Delaware statutory trust and a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Company and issued
two
-year revolving asset-backed variable funding notes to unrelated third party conduits pursuant to a master indenture dated as of November 2, 2001, as supplemented by the Series 2014-A indenture supplement dated as of May 15, 2014 among the Issuer, Sterling Jewelers Inc. (“SJI”) and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, the indenture trustee. During the second quarter of Fiscal 2017, Signet amended the note purchase agreement associated with the asset-backed securitization facility to extend the term of the facility by one year to May 2018 with remaining terms substantially consistent with the existing agreement. The amendment was accounted for as a modification of existing debt in accordance with ASC 470-50. In connection with the amendment of the note purchase agreement, incremental fees of
$0.6 million
million were incurred and capitalized.
Under terms of the notes, the Issuer has obtained
$600 million
of financing from the unrelated third party commercial paper conduits sponsored by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., which indebtedness is secured by credit card receivables originated from time to time by SJI. The credit card receivables will ultimately be transferred to the Issuer and are serviced by SJI. Signet guarantees the performance by SJI of its obligations under the agreements associated with this financing arrangement. Borrowings under the asset-backed variable funding notes bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin. Payments received from customers for balances outstanding on securitized credit card receivables are utilized to repay amounts outstanding under the facility each period, while proceeds from the facility are received for incremental credit card
116
receivables originated when the receivables are pledged to the Issuer. Such payments received from customers and proceeds from the facility are reflected on a gross basis in the consolidated statements of cash flows. As of
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
,
$600.0 million
remained outstanding under the securitization facility with a weighted average interest rate of
2.05%
and
1.61%
during
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively.
Capitalized fees relating to the asset-backed securitization facility total
$3.4 million
. Accumulated amortization related to these capitalized fees as of
January 28, 2017
was
$3.1 million
(
January 30, 2016
:
$2.4 million
). Amortization relating to these fees of
$0.7 million
and
$1.5 million
was recorded as interest expense in the consolidated income statements for
Fiscal 2017
and
Fiscal 2016
, respectively.
Other
As of
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.
As of
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
, there were
$14.2 million
and
$24.4 million
in overdrafts, which represent issued and outstanding checks where no bank balances exist with the right of offset.
21
. Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Accrued compensation
|
$
|
105.8
|
|
|
$
|
162.3
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
33.0
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
||
|
Other taxes
|
45.1
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
||
|
Payroll taxes
|
9.9
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
||
|
Accrued expenses
|
284.4
|
|
|
243.4
|
|
||
|
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
$
|
478.2
|
|
|
$
|
498.3
|
|
The sales returns reserve, included in accrued expenses, is as follows:
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Sales return reserve, beginning of period
|
$
|
14.0
|
|
|
$
|
15.3
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
Net adjustment
(1)
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
6.9
|
|
|||
|
Sales return reserve, end of period
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
|
$
|
14.0
|
|
|
$
|
15.3
|
|
(1)
Net adjustment relates to sales returns previously provided for, changes in estimate and the impact of foreign exchange translation.
Sterling Jewelers and Zale Jewelry segments provide a product lifetime diamond guarantee as long as six-month inspections are performed and certified by an authorized store representative. Provided the customer has complied with the
six
-month inspection policy, the Company will replace, at no cost to the customer, any stone that chips, breaks or is lost from its original setting during normal wear. Management estimates the warranty accrual based on the lag of actual claims experience and the costs of such claims, inclusive of labor and material. Sterling Jewelers also provides a similar product lifetime guarantee on color gemstones. The warranty reserve for diamond and gemstone guarantee, included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and other non-current liabilities, is as follows:
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Warranty reserve, beginning of period
|
$
|
41.9
|
|
|
$
|
44.9
|
|
|
$
|
19.1
|
|
|
Warranty obligations acquired
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|||
|
Warranty expense
(1)
|
11.5
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|||
|
Utilized
(2)
|
(13.4
|
)
|
|
(13.8
|
)
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|||
|
Warranty reserve, end of period
|
$
|
40.0
|
|
|
$
|
41.9
|
|
|
$
|
44.9
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes impact of acquisition accounting adjustment related to warranty obligations acquired in the Zale Acquisition.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes impact of foreign exchange translation.
|
117
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Disclosed as:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Current liabilities
(1)
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities (see Note 23)
|
27.0
|
|
|
29.6
|
|
||
|
Total warranty reserve
|
$
|
40.0
|
|
|
$
|
41.9
|
|
|
(1)
|
Included within accrued expenses above.
|
22
. Deferred revenue
Deferred revenue is comprised primarily of ESP and voucher promotions and other as follows:
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Sterling Jewelers ESP deferred revenue
|
$
|
737.4
|
|
|
$
|
715.1
|
|
|
Zale ESP deferred revenue
|
168.2
|
|
|
146.1
|
|
||
|
Voucher promotions and other
|
30.3
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
||
|
Total deferred revenue
|
$
|
935.9
|
|
|
$
|
889.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Disclosed as:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Current liabilities
|
$
|
276.9
|
|
|
$
|
260.3
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
659.0
|
|
|
629.1
|
|
||
|
Total deferred revenue
|
$
|
935.9
|
|
|
$
|
889.4
|
|
ESP deferred revenue
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||
|
Sterling Jewelers ESP deferred revenue, beginning of period
|
$
|
715.1
|
|
|
$
|
668.9
|
|
|
Plans sold
|
290.8
|
|
|
281.2
|
|
||
|
Revenue recognized
|
(268.5
|
)
|
|
(235.0
|
)
|
||
|
Sterling Jewelers ESP deferred revenue, end of period
|
$
|
737.4
|
|
|
$
|
715.1
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||
|
Zale ESP deferred revenue, beginning of period
|
$
|
146.1
|
|
|
$
|
120.3
|
|
|
Plans sold
(1)
|
150.1
|
|
|
138.6
|
|
||
|
Revenue recognized
|
(128.0
|
)
|
|
(112.8
|
)
|
||
|
Zale ESP deferred revenue, end of period
|
$
|
168.2
|
|
|
$
|
146.1
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes impact of foreign exchange translation.
|
23
. Other liabilities—non-current
|
(in millions)
|
January 28, 2017
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||
|
Straight-line rent
|
$
|
87.2
|
|
|
$
|
81.2
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
40.7
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
||
|
Warranty reserve
|
27.0
|
|
|
29.6
|
|
||
|
Lease loss reserve
|
1.3
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
||
|
Other liabilities
|
57.5
|
|
|
79.8
|
|
||
|
Total other liabilities
|
$
|
213.7
|
|
|
$
|
230.5
|
|
A lease loss reserve is recorded for the net present value of the difference between the contractual rent obligations and sublease income expected from the properties.
118
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
||||
|
Lease loss reserve, beginning of period
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
Adjustments, net
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
||
|
Utilization
(1)
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
||
|
Lease loss reserve, end of period
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes impact of foreign exchange translation.
|
The cash expenditures on the remaining lease loss reserve are expected to be paid over the various remaining lease terms through 2023.
24
. Share-based compensation
Signet operates several share-based compensation plans which can be categorized as the “Omnibus Plan,” “Share Saving Plans” and the “Executive Plans.”
Impact on results
Share-based compensation expense and the associated tax benefits recognized in the consolidated income statements are as follows:
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
16.4
|
|
|
$
|
12.1
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
$
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.3
|
)
|
As of
January 28, 2017
, unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards granted under share-based compensation plans is as follows:
|
|
Unrecognized Compensation Cost
|
|
Weighted average period
|
||
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
||
|
Omnibus Plan
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
1.8 years
|
|
Share Saving Plans
|
5.0
|
|
|
1.8 years
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
As of April 2012, the Company opted to satisfy share option exercises and the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under its plans with the issuance of treasury shares.
Omnibus Plan
In June 2009, Signet adopted the Signet Jewelers Limited Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”). Awards that may be granted under the Omnibus Plan include restricted stock, RSUs, stock options and stock appreciation rights. The
Fiscal 2017
,
Fiscal 2016
and
Fiscal 2015
awards granted under the Omnibus Plan have two elements, time-based restricted stock and performance-based RSUs. The time-based restricted stock has a
three
year vesting period, subject to continued employment, and has the same voting rights and dividend rights as common shares (which are payable once the shares have vested). Performance-based RSUs granted include two performance measures, operating income (subject to certain adjustments) and return on capital employed (“ROCE”), with ROCE measure only applicable to senior executives. For both performance measures, cumulative results achieved during the relevant three year performance period are compared to target metrics established in the underlying grant agreements. The relevant performance is measured over a
three
year vesting period from the start of the fiscal year in which the award is granted. The Omnibus Plan permits the grant of awards to employees for up to
7,000,000
common shares.
In Fiscal 2015, the Company issued a grant of performance-based RSUs under the Omnibus Plan. This grant occurred as part of the Signet Integration Incentive Plan (“IIP”), a transaction-related special incentive program that was designed to facilitate the integration of the Zale Acquisition and to reward the anticipated efforts of key management personnel on both sides of the transaction. The RSUs vested, subject to continued employment, based upon gross synergies realized during the one year performance period compared to targeted gross synergy metrics established in the underlying grant agreement.
The significant assumptions utilized to estimate the weighted-average fair value of awards granted under the Omnibus Plan are as follows:
119
|
|
Omnibus Plan
|
||||||||||
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Share price
|
$
|
109.03
|
|
|
$
|
136.37
|
|
|
$
|
104.57
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|||
|
Expected term
|
2.8 years
|
|
|
2.9 years
|
|
|
2.7 years
|
|
|||
|
Expected volatility
|
28.5
|
%
|
|
25.4
|
%
|
|
32.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Dividend yield
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|||
|
Fair value
|
$
|
106.48
|
|
|
$
|
134.46
|
|
|
$
|
103.12
|
|
The risk-free interest rate is based on the US Treasury (for US-based award recipients in all fiscal years and UK-based award recipients in Fiscal 2017) or UK Gilt (for UK-based award recipients in Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015) yield curve in effect at the grant date with remaining terms equal to the expected term of the awards. The expected term utilized is based on the contractual vesting period of the awards. The expected volatility is determined by calculating the historical volatility of Signet’s share price over the expected term of the award.
The
Fiscal 2017
activity for awards granted under the Omnibus Plan is as follows:
|
|
Omnibus Plans
|
|||||||||||
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
No. of
shares |
|
Weighted
average grant date fair value |
|
Weighted
average remaining contractual life |
|
Intrinsic
value (1) |
|||||
|
Outstanding at January 30, 2016
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
101.88
|
|
|
1.1 years
|
|
$
|
69.8
|
|
|
Fiscal 2017 activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Granted
|
0.3
|
|
|
106.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Vested
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
84.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Lapsed
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
73.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Outstanding at January 28, 2017
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
111.98
|
|
|
1.3 years
|
|
$
|
53.0
|
|
|
(1)
|
Intrinsic value for outstanding restricted stock and RSUs is based on the fair market value of Signet’s common stock on the last business day of the fiscal year.
|
The following table summarizes additional information about awards granted under the Omnibus Plan:
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Total intrinsic value of awards vested
|
$
|
13.6
|
|
|
$
|
22.2
|
|
|
$
|
43.9
|
|
Share Saving Plans
Signet has three share option savings plans (collectively, the “Share Saving Plans”) available to employees as follows:
|
•
|
Employee Share Savings Plan, for US employees
|
|
•
|
Sharesave Plan, for UK employees
|
|
•
|
Irish Sharesave Plan for Republic of Ireland employees
|
The Share Saving Plans are compensatory and compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period. In any
10
year period not more than
10%
of the issued common shares of the Company from time to time may, in aggregate, be issued or be issuable pursuant to options granted under the Share Saving Plans or any other employees share plans adopted by Signet.
The Employee Share Savings Plan is a savings plan intended to qualify under US Section 423 of the US Internal Revenue Code and allows employees to purchase common shares at a discount of approximately
15%
to the closing price of the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant. Options granted under the Employee Share Savings Plan vest after 24 months and are generally only exercisable between 24 and 27 months of the grant date.
The Sharesave Plan and Irish Sharesave Plan allow eligible employees to purchase common shares at a discount of approximately 20% below a determined market price based on the New York Stock Exchange. The market price is determined as the average middle market price for the three trading days prior to the invitation date, or the market price on the day immediately preceding the participation date or other market price agreed in writing, whichever is the higher value. Options granted under the Sharesave Plan and the Irish Sharesave Plan vest after 36 months and are generally only exercisable between 36 and 42 months from commencement of the related savings contract.
The significant assumptions utilized to estimate the weighted-average fair value of awards granted under the Share Saving Plans are as follows:
120
|
|
Share Saving Plans
|
||||||||||
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Share price
|
$
|
84.37
|
|
|
$
|
139.18
|
|
|
$
|
114.93
|
|
|
Exercise price
|
$
|
67.24
|
|
|
$
|
114.67
|
|
|
$
|
96.67
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|||
|
Expected term
|
2.7 years
|
|
|
2.6 years
|
|
|
2.8 years
|
|
|||
|
Expected volatility
|
31.3
|
%
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
|||
|
Dividend yield
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|||
|
Fair value
|
$
|
22.82
|
|
|
$
|
34.76
|
|
|
$
|
28.76
|
|
The risk-free interest rate is based on the US Treasury (for US-based award recipients) or UK Gilt (for UK-based award recipients) yield curve in effect at the grant date with remaining terms equal to the expected term of the awards. The expected term utilized is based on the contractual vesting period of the awards, inclusive of any exercise period available to award recipients after vesting. The expected volatility is determined by calculating the historical volatility of Signet’s share price over the expected term of the awards.
The
Fiscal 2017
activity for awards granted under the Share Saving Plans is as follows:
|
|
Share Saving Plans
|
|||||||||||
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
No. of
shares |
|
Weighted
average exercise price |
|
Weighted
average remaining contractual life |
|
Intrinsic
value (1) |
|||||
|
Outstanding at January 30, 2016
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
94.07
|
|
|
1.9 years
|
|
$
|
4.9
|
|
|
Fiscal 2017 activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Granted
|
0.2
|
|
|
67.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Exercised
|
—
|
|
|
48.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Lapsed
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
101.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Outstanding at January 28, 2017
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
74.30
|
|
|
2.0 years
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
Exercisable at January 30, 2016
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Exercisable at January 28, 2017
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
(1)
Intrinsic value for outstanding awards is based on the fair market value of Signet’s common stock on the last business day of the fiscal year.
The following table summarizes additional information about awards granted under the Share Saving Plans:
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Weighted average grant date fair value per share of awards granted
|
$
|
22.82
|
|
|
$
|
34.76
|
|
|
$
|
28.76
|
|
|
Total intrinsic value of options exercised
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
6.4
|
|
|
$
|
11.0
|
|
|
Cash received from share options exercised
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
4.0
|
|
|
$
|
4.3
|
|
Executive Plans
Signet operates three 2003 executive share plans (the “2003 Plans”), together referred to as the “Executive Plans.” Option awards under the Executive Plans were generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s shares at the date of grant. No awards have been granted under the Executive Plans since the adoption of the Omnibus Plan in Fiscal 2010. During Fiscal 2014, the plan periods for the Executive Plans expired. As a result, no additional awards may be granted under the Executive Plans.
The following table summarizes additional information about awards granted under the Executive Plans:
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Total intrinsic value of options exercised
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
Cash received from share options exercised
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
As of
January 28, 2017
and
January 30, 2016
, the intrinsic value of unexercised awards outstanding under the Executive Plans was
$0.3 million
and
$1.5 million
, respectively. The outstanding awards, which are all exercisable, expire prior to the end of 2018.
121
25
. Commitments and contingencies
Operating leases
Signet occupies certain properties and holds machinery and vehicles under operating leases. Rental expense for operating leases is as follows:
|
(in millions)
|
Fiscal 2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||
|
Minimum rentals
|
$
|
524.4
|
|
|
$
|
525.7
|
|
|
$
|
462.9
|
|
|
Contingent rent
|
10.2
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|||
|
Sublease income
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
534.0
|
|
|
$
|
540.3
|
|
|
$
|
476.1
|
|
The future minimum operating lease payments for operating leases having initial or non-cancelable terms in excess of one year are as follows:
Contingent property liabilities
Approximately
26
UK property leases had been assigned by Signet at
January 28, 2017
(and remained unexpired and occupied by assignees at that date) and approximately
12
additional properties were sub-leased at that date. Should the assignees or sub-tenants fail to fulfill any obligations in respect of those leases or any other leases which have at any other time been assigned or sub-leased, Signet or one of its UK subsidiaries may be liable for those defaults. The number of such claims arising to date has been small, and the liability, which is charged to the income statement as it arises, has not been material.
Capital commitments
At
January 28, 2017
Signet has committed to spend
$48.4 million
(
January 30, 2016
:
$28.9 million
) related to capital commitments. These commitments principally relate to the expansion and renovation of stores.
Legal proceedings
Employment practices
As previously reported, in March 2008, a group of private plaintiffs (the “Claimants”) filed a class action lawsuit for an unspecified amount against SJI, a subsidiary of Signet, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging that US store-level employment practices are discriminatory as to compensation and promotional activities with respect to gender. In June 2008, the District Court referred the matter to private arbitration where the Claimants sought to proceed on a class-wide basis. The Claimants filed a motion for class certification and SJI opposed the motion. A hearing on the class certification motion was held in late February 2014. On February 2, 2015, the arbitrator issued a Class Determination Award in which she certified for a class-wide hearing Claimants’ disparate impact declaratory and injunctive relief class claim under Title VII, with a class period of July 22, 2004 through date of trial for the Claimants’ compensation claims and December 7, 2004 through date of trial for Claimants’ promotion claims. The arbitrator otherwise denied Claimants’ motion to certify a disparate treatment class alleged under Title VII, denied a disparate impact monetary damages class alleged under Title VII, and denied an opt-out monetary damages class under the Equal Pay Act. On February 9, 2015, Claimants filed an Emergency Motion To Restrict Communications With The Certified Class And For Corrective Notice. SJI filed its opposition to Claimants’ emergency motion on February 17, 2015, and a hearing was held on February 18, 2015. Claimants’ motion was granted in part and denied in part in an order issued on March 16, 2015. Claimants filed a Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Title VII Claims for Disparate Treatment in Compensation on February 11, 2015. SJI filed its opposition to Claimants’ Motion for Reconsideration on March 4, 2015. Claimants’ reply was filed on March 16, 2015. Claimants’ Motion was denied in an order issued April 27, 2015. SJI filed with the US District Court for the Southern District of New York a Motion to Vacate the Arbitrator’s Class Certification Award on March 3, 2015. Claimants’ opposition was filed on March 23, 2015 and SJI’s reply was filed on April 3, 2015. SJI’s motion was heard on May 4, 2015. On November 16, 2015, the US District Court for the Southern District of New York granted SJI’s Motion to Vacate the Arbitrator’s Class Certification Award in part and denied it in part. On November 25, 2015, SJI filed a Motion to Stay the AAA Proceedings while SJI appeals the decision of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Claimants filed their opposition on December 2, 2015. On December 3, 2015, SJI filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit SJI’s Notice of Appeal of the
122
Southern District’s November 16, 2015 Opinion and Order. The arbitrator issued an order denying SJI’s Motion to Stay on February 22, 2016. SJI filed its Brief and Special Appendix with the Second Circuit on March 16, 2016. The matter was fully briefed and oral argument was heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on November 2, 2016. On April 6, 2015, Claimants filed in the AAA Claimants’ Motion for Clarification or in the Alternative Motion for Stay of the Effect of the Class Certification Award as to the Individual Intentional Discrimination Claims. SJI filed its opposition on May 12, 2015. Claimants’ reply was filed on May 22, 2015. Claimants’ motion was granted on June 15, 2015. Claimants filed Claimants’ Motion for Conditional Certification of Claimants’ Equal Pay Act Claims and Authorization of Notice on March 6, 2015. SJI’s opposition was filed on May 1, 2015. Claimants filed their reply on June 5, 2015. The arbitrator heard oral argument on Claimants’ Motion on December 18, 2015 and, on February 29, 2016, issued an Equal Pay Act Collective Action Conditional Certification Award and Order Re Claimants’ Motion For Tolling Of EPA Limitations Period, conditionally certifying Claimants’ Equal Pay Act claims as a collective action, and tolling the statute of limitations on EPA claims to October 16, 2003 to ninety days after notice issues to the putative members of the collective action. SJI filed in the AAA a Motion To Stay Arbitration Pending The District Court’s Consideration Of Respondent’s Motion To Vacate Arbitrator’s Equal Pay Act Collective Action Conditional Certification Award And Order Re Claimants’ Motion For Tolling Of EPA Limitations Period on March 10, 2016. SJI filed in the AAA a Renewed Motion To Stay Arbitration Pending The District Court’s Resolution Of Sterling’s Motion To Vacate Arbitrator’s Equal Pay Act Collective Action Conditional Certification Award And Order Re Claimants’ Motion For Tolling Of EPA Limitations Period on March 31, 2016. Claimants filed their opposition on April 4, 2016. The arbitrator denied SJI’s Motion on April 5, 2016. On March 23, 2016 SJI filed with the US District Court for the Southern District of New York a Motion To Vacate The Arbitrator’s Equal Pay Act Collective Action Conditional Certification Award And Order Re Claimants’ Motion For Tolling Of EPA Limitations Period. Claimants filed their opposition brief on April 11, 2016, SJI filed its reply on April 20, 2016, and oral argument was heard on SJI’s Motion on May 11, 2016. SJI’s Motion was denied on May 22, 2016. On May 31, 2016, SJI filed a Notice Of Appeal of Judge Rakoff’s opinion and order to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. SJI’s brief was filed September 13, 2016, and Claimants’ brief was filed on December 13, 2016, and SJI filed its reply brief on January 10, 2017. Claimants filed a Motion For Amended Class Determination Award on November 18, 2015, and on March 31, 2016 the arbitrator entered an order amending the Title VII class certification award to preclude class members from requesting exclusion from the injunctive and declaratory relief class certified in the arbitration. The arbitrator issued a Bifurcated Case Management Plan on April 5, 2016, and ordered into effect the parties’ Stipulation Regarding Notice Of Equal Pay Act Collective Action And Related Notice Administrative Procedures on April 7, 2016. SJI filed in the AAA a Motion For Protective Order on May 2, 2016. Claimants’ opposition was filed on June 3, 2016. The matter was fully briefed and oral argument was heard on July 22, 2016. The motion was granted in part on January 27, 2017. Notice to EPA collective action members was issued on May 3, 2016, and the opt-in period for these notice recipients closed on August 1, 2016. On January 4, 2017, the Arbitrator issued a Second Amended Bifurcated Case Management Order. At this time,
10,456
current and former employees have submitted consent forms to opt in to the collective action. We are awaiting a trial date in this matter, which we are anticipating to be set for calendar 2018.
Also, as previously reported, on September 23, 2008, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed a lawsuit against SJI in the US District Court for the Western District of New York. The EEOC’s lawsuit alleges that SJI engaged in intentional and disparate impact gender discrimination with respect to pay and promotions of female retail store employees from January 1, 2003 to the present. The EEOC asserts claims for unspecified monetary relief and non-monetary relief against the Company on behalf of a class of female employees subjected to these alleged practices. Non-expert fact discovery closed in mid-May 2013. In September 2013, SJI made a motion for partial summary judgment on procedural grounds, which was referred to a Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge heard oral arguments on the summary judgment motion in December 2013. On January 2, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report, Recommendation and Order, recommending that the Court grant SJI’s motion for partial summary judgment and dismiss the EEOC’s claims in their entirety. The EEOC filed its objections to the Magistrate Judge’s ruling and SJI filed its response thereto. The District Court Judge heard oral arguments on the EEOC’s objections to the Magistrate Judge’s ruling on March 7, 2014 and on March 11, 2014 entered an order dismissing the action with prejudice. On May 12, 2014, the EEOC filed its Notice of Appeal of the District Court Judge’s dismissal of the action to United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The parties fully briefed the appeal and oral argument occurred on May 5, 2015. On September 9, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision vacating the District Court’s order and remanding the case back to the District Court for further proceedings. SJI filed a Petition for Panel Rehearing and En Banc Review with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which was denied on December 1, 2015. On December 4, 2015, SJI filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit a Motion Of Appellee Sterling Jewelers Inc. For Stay Of Mandate Pending Petition For Writ Of Certiorari. The Motion was granted by the Second Circuit on December 10, 2015. SJI filed a Petition For Writ Of Certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States on April 29, 2016, which was denied. The case was remanded to the Western District of New York and on November 2, 2016, the Court issued a case scheduling order. On January 25, 2017, the parties filed a joint motion to extend case scheduling order deadlines. The motion was granted on January 27, 2017.
SJI denies the allegations of the Claimants and EEOC and has been defending these cases vigorously. At this point, no outcome or possible loss or range of losses, if any, arising from the litigation is able to be estimated.
Prior to the Acquisition, Zale Corporation was a defendant in
three
purported class action lawsuits, Tessa Hodge v. Zale Delaware, Inc., d/b/a Piercing Pagoda which was filed on April 23, 2013 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino; Naomi Tapia v. Zale Corporation which was filed on July 3, 2013 in the US District Court, Southern District of California; and Melissa Roberts v. Zale Delaware, Inc. which was filed on October 7, 2013 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles. All
three
cases include allegations that Zale Corporation violated various wage and hour labor laws. Relief is sought on behalf of current and former Piercing Pagoda and Zale Corporation’s employees. The lawsuits seek to recover damages, penalties and attorneys’ fees as a result of the alleged violations. Without admitting
123
or conceding any liability, the Company reached an agreement to settle the Hodge and Roberts matters for an immaterial amount. Final approval of the settlement was granted on March 9, 2015 and the settlement was implemented.
On April 6, 2016, the Court conditionally certified an opt-in collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) of all current and former employees of Zale Delaware Inc. d/b/a Zale Corporation who were designated by Zale as nonexempt and who worked in a Zale retail store in the United States at any time from July 3, 2010 to the present. Additionally, the court certified an opt-out class action of the remaining claims on behalf of all current and former employees of Zale Delaware Inc. d/b/a Zale Corporation who were designated by Zale as nonexempt, and worked in a Zale retail store in the State of California at any time from July 3, 2009 to the present. On December 28, 2016, the Company participated in a mediation of all claims in the action. The mediation resulted in a settlement agreement signed by both parties. The settlement agreement is subject to court approval. The Company anticipates that the settlement will be approved on a final basis in 2017.
Litigation Challenging the Company’s Acquisition of Zale Corporation
Five putative stockholder class action lawsuits challenging the Company’s acquisition of Zale Corporation were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware: Breyer v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9388-VCP, filed February 24, 2014; Stein v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9408-VCP, filed March 3, 2014; Singh v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9409-VCP, filed March 3, 2014; Smart v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9420-VCP, filed March 6, 2014; and Pill v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9440-VCP, filed March 12, 2014 (collectively, the “Actions”). Each of these Actions was brought by a purported former holder of Zale Corporation common stock, both individually and on behalf of a putative class of former Zale Corporation stockholders.
The Court of Chancery consolidated the Actions on March 25, 2014 (the “Consolidated Action”), and the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint on April 23, 2014, which named as defendants Zale Corporation, the members of the board of directors of Zale Corporation, the Company, and a merger-related subsidiary of the Company, and alleged that the Zale Corporation directors breached their fiduciary duties to Zale Corporation stockholders in connection with their consideration and approval of the merger agreement by failing to maximize stockholder value and agreeing to an inadequate merger price and to deal terms that deter higher bids. That complaint also alleged that the Zale Corporation directors issued a materially misleading and incomplete proxy statement regarding the merger and that Zale Corporation and the Company aided and abetted the Zale Corporation directors’ breaches of fiduciary duty. On May 23, 2014, the Court of Chancery denied plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent the consummation of the merger.
On September 30, 2014, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint asserting substantially similar claims and allegations as the prior complaint. The amended complaint added Zale Corporation’s former financial advisor, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, as a defendant for allegedly aiding and abetting the Zale Corporation directors’ breaches of fiduciary duty. The amended complaint no longer named as defendants Zale Corporation or the Company’s merger-related subsidiary. The amended complaint sought, among other things, rescission of the merger or damages, as well as attorneys’ and experts’ fees. The defendant’s motion to dismiss was heard by the Court of Chancery on May 20, 2015. On October 1, 2015, the Court dismissed the claims against the Zale Corporation directors and the Company. On October 29, 2015, the Court dismissed the claims against Bank of America Merrill Lynch. On November 30, 2015, plaintiffs filed an appeal of the October 1, 2015 and October 29, 2015 decisions of the Court of Chancery with the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. On May 6, 2016, the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware affirmed the Court of Chancery’s dismissal of the entirety of the amended complaint.
Appraisal Litigation
Following the consummation of the acquisition of Zale Corporation by the Company, former Zale Corporation stockholders sought appraisal pursuant to 8 Del. C. § 262 in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, in consolidated proceedings captioned Merion Capital L.P. et al. v. Zale Corp., C.A. No. 9731-VCP,TIG Arbitrage Opportunity Fund I, L.P. v. Zale Corp., C.A. No. 10070-VCP,and The Gabelli ABC Fund et al. v. Zale Corp., C.A. No. 10162-VCP(the “Appraisal Action”). The total number of shares of Zale Corporation’s common stock for which appraisal had been demanded was approximately
8.8 million
.
On August 12, 2015, the parties in the Appraisal Action entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”). The terms of the Settlement Agreement provided for the payment to petitioners in the Appraisal Action of
$21.00
per share of Zale Corporation common stock (the consideration offered in the Company’s acquisition of Zale Corporation) plus a total sum of
$34.2 million
to be allocated among petitioners, which proceeds are inclusive of and in satisfaction of any statutory interest that may have accrued on petitioners’ shares pursuant to 8 Del. C. § 262. On August 12, 2015, the Court of Chancery dismissed the Appraisal Action pursuant to the Settlement Agreement as to all former Zale Corporation stockholders who have submitted and not withdrawn a demand for appraisal. The Company recorded an accrual for the Settlement Agreement of
$34.2 million
during the second quarter of Fiscal 2016. This amount was paid to petitioners during the third quarter of Fiscal 2016.
Shareholder Action
On August 25, 2016, Susan Dube filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company and its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, purportedly on behalf of stockholders that acquired the Company’s securities between January 7, 2016, and June 3, 2016, inclusive (Dube v. Signet Jewelers Limited, et al., Civ. No. 16-6728 (S.D.N.Y.)). On August 31, 2016, Lyubomir Spasov filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging identical claims against the Company and its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Spasov v. Signet Jewelers Limited, et al., Civ. No. 16-06861 (S.D.N.Y.)). On September 16, 2016, the two complaints were consolidated under case number 16-CV-6728, and on November 21,
124
2016, Susan Dube and Lyubomir Spasov were named co-lead plaintiffs. On January 30, 2017, co-lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint purportedly on behalf of a putative class of stockholders that acquired the Company’s securities between November 25, 2014, and August 25, 2016, which alleged that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by, among other things, misrepresenting the Company’s business and earnings by failing to disclose that the Company was allegedly experiencing difficulty ensuring the safety of customer’s jewelry while in Signet’s custody for repairs, which resulted in a drop-off in customer confidence, and making misleading statements about its credit portfolio. The amended complaint alleged that as a result of the alleged misrepresentations, the Company’s share price was artificially inflated and sought unspecified compensatory damages and costs and expenses, including attorneys’ and experts’ fees. On March 1, 2017, Plaintiffs sought leave from the Court to file a second amended complaint to add additional allegations and/or claims concerning public reports of sexual harassment allegations raised by certain claimants in an ongoing pay and promotion gender discrimination class arbitration. The Court granted Plaintiffs’ request and the second amended complaint is due to be filed on or before April 3, 2017. Defendants’ have until May 19, 2017, to answer or move to dismiss the second amended complaint. The Company believes that plaintiffs’ allegations are without merit and cannot estimate a range of potential liability, if any, at this time.
In the ordinary course of business, Signet may be subject, from time to time, to various other proceedings, lawsuits, disputes or claims incidental to its business, which the Company believes are not significant to Signet’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
26
. Condensed consolidating financial information
The accompanying condensed consolidating financial information has been prepared and presented pursuant to SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 3-10, “Financial Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered.” We and certain of our subsidiaries have guaranteed the obligations under certain debt securities that have been issued by Signet UK Finance plc. The following presents the condensed consolidating financial information for: (i) the indirect Parent Company (Signet Jewelers Limited); (ii) the Issuer of the guaranteed obligations (Signet UK Finance plc); (iii) the Guarantor subsidiaries, on a combined basis; (iv) the non-guarantor subsidiaries, on a combined basis; (v) consolidating eliminations; and (vi) Signet Jewelers Limited and Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Each Guarantor subsidiary is 100% owned by the Parent Company at the date of each balance sheet presented. The Guarantor subsidiaries, along with Signet Jewelers Limited, will fully and unconditionally guarantee the obligations of Signet UK Finance plc under any such debt securities. Each entity in the consolidating financial information follows the same accounting policies as described in the consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying condensed consolidating financial information has been presented on the equity method of accounting for all periods presented. Under this method, investments in subsidiaries are recorded at cost and adjusted for the subsidiaries’ cumulative results of operations, capital contributions and distributions, and other changes in equity. Elimination entries include consolidating and eliminating entries for investments in subsidiaries, and intra-entity activity and balances.
125
Condensed Consolidating Income Statement
For the
52 week period ended
January 28, 2017
|
(in millions)
|
Signet
Jewelers Limited |
|
Signet UK
Finance plc |
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries |
|
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
|
Sales
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,141.9
|
|
|
$
|
266.5
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,408.4
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3,997.2
|
)
|
|
(50.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,047.6
|
)
|
||||||
|
Gross margin
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,144.7
|
|
|
216.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,360.8
|
|
||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,775.1
|
)
|
|
(103.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,880.2
|
)
|
||||||
|
Other operating income, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
293.8
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
282.6
|
|
||||||
|
Operating (loss) income
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
663.4
|
|
|
101.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
763.2
|
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity interest income (expense)
|
—
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
(188.4
|
)
|
|
169.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
—
|
|
|
(19.8
|
)
|
|
(16.6
|
)
|
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(49.4
|
)
|
||||||
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
458.4
|
|
|
257.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
713.8
|
|
||||||
|
Income taxes
|
—
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
(175.1
|
)
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(170.6
|
)
|
||||||
|
Equity in income of subsidiaries
|
544.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
276.4
|
|
|
295.7
|
|
|
(1,116.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
543.2
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
559.7
|
|
|
557.7
|
|
|
(1,116.6
|
)
|
|
543.2
|
|
||||||
|
Dividends on redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
531.3
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
559.7
|
|
|
$
|
557.7
|
|
|
$
|
(1,116.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
531.3
|
|
126
Condensed Consolidating Income Statement
For the
52 week period ended
January 30, 2016
|
(in millions)
|
Signet
Jewelers Limited |
|
Signet UK
Finance plc |
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries |
|
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
|
Sales
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,444.8
|
|
|
$
|
105.4
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,550.2
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,089.3
|
)
|
|
(20.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,109.8
|
)
|
||||||
|
Gross margin
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,355.5
|
|
|
84.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,440.4
|
|
||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,942.7
|
)
|
|
(42.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,987.6
|
)
|
||||||
|
Other operating income, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
254.8
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
250.9
|
|
||||||
|
Operating (loss) income
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
667.6
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
703.7
|
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity interest income (expense)
|
—
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
(186.0
|
)
|
|
167.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
—
|
|
|
(19.9
|
)
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(45.9
|
)
|
||||||
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
466.8
|
|
|
194.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
657.8
|
|
||||||
|
Income taxes
|
—
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
(192.7
|
)
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(189.9
|
)
|
||||||
|
Equity in income of subsidiaries
|
470.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
281.4
|
|
|
293.9
|
|
|
(1,045.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
467.9
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
555.5
|
|
|
490.8
|
|
|
(1,045.4
|
)
|
|
467.9
|
|
||||||
|
Dividends on redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
555.5
|
|
|
$
|
490.8
|
|
|
$
|
(1,045.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Income Statement
For the
52 week period ended
January 31, 2015
|
(in millions)
|
Signet
Jewelers Limited |
|
Signet UK
Finance plc |
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries |
|
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
|
Sales
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,671.4
|
|
|
$
|
64.9
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,736.3
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3,647.0
|
)
|
|
(15.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3,662.1
|
)
|
||||||
|
Gross margin
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,024.4
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,074.2
|
|
||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,683.6
|
)
|
|
(26.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,712.9
|
)
|
||||||
|
Other operating income, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
220.8
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
215.3
|
|
||||||
|
Operating (loss) income
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
561.6
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
576.6
|
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity interest income (expense)
|
—
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
(129.6
|
)
|
|
116.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
—
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(36.0
|
)
|
||||||
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
417.2
|
|
|
126.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
540.6
|
|
||||||
|
Income taxes
|
—
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
(159.5
|
)
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(159.3
|
)
|
||||||
|
Equity in income of subsidiaries
|
383.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
579.8
|
|
|
565.4
|
|
|
(1,529.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
381.3
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
837.5
|
|
|
692.1
|
|
|
(1,529.0
|
)
|
|
381.3
|
|
||||||
|
Dividends on redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
837.5
|
|
|
$
|
692.1
|
|
|
$
|
(1,529.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
127
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the
52 week period ended
January 28, 2017
|
(in millions)
|
Signet
Jewelers Limited |
|
Signet UK
Finance plc |
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries |
|
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
543.2
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
559.7
|
|
|
$
|
557.7
|
|
|
$
|
(1,116.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
543.2
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(31.2
|
)
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
(25.6
|
)
|
||||||
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
|
6.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
6.9
|
|
||||||
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses to net income
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
||||||
|
Pension plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Actuarial gain (loss)
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
||||||
|
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial losses
|
1.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
1.2
|
|
||||||
|
Prior service costs
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
||||||
|
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of net prior service credits
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
|
(33.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(39.2
|
)
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
|
(33.6
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
509.6
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
520.5
|
|
|
$
|
563.3
|
|
|
$
|
(1,083.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
509.6
|
|
128
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the
52 week period ended
January 30, 2016
|
(in millions)
|
Signet
Jewelers Limited |
|
Signet UK
Finance plc |
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries |
|
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
555.5
|
|
|
$
|
490.8
|
|
|
$
|
(1,045.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(40.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(44.8
|
)
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
(40.2
|
)
|
||||||
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
||||||
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
||||||
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses to net income
|
3.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
3.5
|
|
||||||
|
Pension plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Actuarial gain (loss)
|
10.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
10.9
|
|
||||||
|
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial losses
|
2.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
2.7
|
|
||||||
|
Prior service costs
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
||||||
|
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of net prior service credits
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
|
(37.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(41.7
|
)
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
(37.5
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
430.4
|
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
513.8
|
|
|
$
|
495.0
|
|
|
$
|
(1,007.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
430.4
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the
52 week period ended
January 31, 2015
|
(in millions)
|
Signet
Jewelers Limited |
|
Signet UK
Finance plc |
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries |
|
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
837.5
|
|
|
$
|
692.1
|
|
|
$
|
(1,529.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(60.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(61.1
|
)
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
56.5
|
|
|
(60.6
|
)
|
||||||
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
|
6.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
6.2
|
|
||||||
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses to net income
|
12.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|
12.5
|
|
||||||
|
Pension plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Actuarial gain (loss)
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
(15.8
|
)
|
||||||
|
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial losses
|
1.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
1.6
|
|
||||||
|
Prior service costs
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
||||||
|
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of net prior service credits
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
|
(58.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(58.6
|
)
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
(58.1
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
323.2
|
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
778.9
|
|
|
$
|
696.7
|
|
|
$
|
(1,475.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
323.2
|
|
129
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
January 28, 2017
|
(in millions)
|
Signet
Jewelers Limited |
|
Signet UK
Finance plc |
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries |
|
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
70.3
|
|
|
$
|
26.6
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
98.7
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,858.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,858.0
|
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity receivables, net
|
12.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
145.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(157.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Other receivables
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
71.1
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
95.9
|
|
||||||
|
Other current assets
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
131.4
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
136.3
|
|
||||||
|
Income taxes
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
||||||
|
Inventories
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,371.8
|
|
|
77.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,449.3
|
|
||||||
|
Total current assets
|
14.4
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
4,652.1
|
|
|
133.8
|
|
|
(157.8
|
)
|
|
4,642.6
|
|
||||||
|
Non-current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
818.5
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
822.9
|
|
||||||
|
Goodwill
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
514.0
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
517.6
|
|
||||||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
417.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
417.0
|
|
||||||
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
3,117.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
721.6
|
|
|
590.9
|
|
|
(4,430.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity receivables, net
|
—
|
|
|
402.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,647.1
|
|
|
(4,050.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Other assets
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
134.8
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
165.1
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred tax assets
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
||||||
|
Retirement benefit asset
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
3,132.0
|
|
|
$
|
403.0
|
|
|
$
|
7,290.5
|
|
|
$
|
4,410.2
|
|
|
$
|
(8,637.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,597.8
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Loans and overdrafts
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
91.8
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
91.1
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
248.2
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
255.7
|
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity payables, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
157.8
|
|
|
(157.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
29.9
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
429.2
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
478.2
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred revenue
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
275.5
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
276.9
|
|
||||||
|
Income taxes
|
—
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
115.5
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
101.8
|
|
||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
29.9
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
1,160.2
|
|
|
169.8
|
|
|
(157.8
|
)
|
|
1,203.7
|
|
||||||
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
—
|
|
|
394.3
|
|
|
323.6
|
|
|
600.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,317.9
|
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity payables, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,050.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,050.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
208.7
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
213.7
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred revenue
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
659.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
659.0
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
101.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
101.4
|
|
||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
29.9
|
|
|
395.9
|
|
|
6,502.9
|
|
|
774.8
|
|
|
(4,207.8
|
)
|
|
3,495.7
|
|
||||||
|
Series A redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
611.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
611.9
|
|
||||||
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
2,490.2
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
787.6
|
|
|
3,635.4
|
|
|
(4,430.1
|
)
|
|
2,490.2
|
|
||||||
|
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred shares and shareholders’ equity
|
$
|
3,132.0
|
|
|
$
|
403.0
|
|
|
$
|
7,290.5
|
|
|
$
|
4,410.2
|
|
|
$
|
(8,637.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,597.8
|
|
130
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
January 30, 2016
|
(in millions)
|
Signet
Jewelers Limited |
|
Signet UK
Finance plc |
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries |
|
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
102.0
|
|
|
$
|
33.7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
137.7
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,753.0
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,756.4
|
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity receivables, net
|
28.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
380.1
|
|
|
(408.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Other receivables
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
68.8
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
84.0
|
|
||||||
|
Other current assets
|
0.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
144.2
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
152.6
|
|
||||||
|
Income taxes
|
—
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
||||||
|
Inventories
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,372.7
|
|
|
81.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,453.9
|
|
||||||
|
Total current assets
|
30.7
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
4,443.0
|
|
|
522.9
|
|
|
(408.8
|
)
|
|
4,588.1
|
|
||||||
|
Non-current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
722.3
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
727.6
|
|
||||||
|
Goodwill
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
511.9
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
515.5
|
|
||||||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
427.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
427.8
|
|
||||||
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
3,047.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
762.9
|
|
|
600.0
|
|
|
(4,410.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity receivables, net
|
—
|
|
|
402.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,467.4
|
|
|
(3,870.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Other assets
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
124.5
|
|
|
30.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
154.6
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred tax assets
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Retirement benefit asset
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
3,078.5
|
|
|
$
|
402.9
|
|
|
$
|
7,043.7
|
|
|
$
|
4,629.3
|
|
|
$
|
(8,689.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,464.9
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Loans and overdrafts
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
58.4
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
57.7
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
260.3
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
269.1
|
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity payables, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
408.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(408.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
17.8
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
467.0
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
498.3
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred revenue
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
260.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
260.3
|
|
||||||
|
Income taxes
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
68.4
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
65.7
|
|
||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
17.8
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
1,523.2
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
(408.8
|
)
|
|
1,151.1
|
|
||||||
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
—
|
|
|
393.5
|
|
|
327.5
|
|
|
600.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,321.0
|
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity payables, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,870.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3,870.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
223.6
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
230.5
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred revenue
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
629.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
629.1
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
73.0
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
72.5
|
|
||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
17.8
|
|
|
395.2
|
|
|
6,646.4
|
|
|
623.6
|
|
|
(4,278.8
|
)
|
|
3,404.2
|
|
||||||
|
Series A redeemable convertible preferred shares
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
3,060.7
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
397.3
|
|
|
4,005.7
|
|
|
(4,410.7
|
)
|
|
3,060.7
|
|
||||||
|
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred shares and shareholders’ equity
|
$
|
3,078.5
|
|
|
$
|
402.9
|
|
|
$
|
7,043.7
|
|
|
$
|
4,629.3
|
|
|
$
|
(8,689.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,464.9
|
|
131
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the
52 week period ended
January 28, 2017
|
(in millions)
|
Signet
Jewelers Limited |
|
Signet UK
Finance plc |
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries |
|
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
$
|
1,057.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
724.8
|
|
|
$
|
525.6
|
|
|
$
|
(1,630.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
678.3
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(277.9
|
)
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(278.0
|
)
|
||||||
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
(610.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
610.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Purchase of available-for-sale securities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(10.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(10.4
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from available-for-sale securities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
||||||
|
Acquisition of Zale Corporation, net of cash acquired
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(610.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(277.9
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
610.0
|
|
|
(278.4
|
)
|
||||||
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Dividends paid on common shares
|
(75.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(75.6
|
)
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity dividends paid
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(730.0
|
)
|
|
(900.1
|
)
|
|
1,630.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares
|
2.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
610.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(610.0
|
)
|
|
2.1
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of redeemable convertible preferred shares, net of issuance costs
|
611.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
611.3
|
|
||||||
|
Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from senior notes
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from term loan
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Repayments of term loan
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(16.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(16.4
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from securitization facility
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,404.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,404.1
|
|
||||||
|
Repayment of securitization facility
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2,404.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2,404.1
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,270.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,270.0
|
|
||||||
|
Repayments of revolving credit facility
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,214.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,214.0
|
)
|
||||||
|
Payment of debt issuance costs
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
||||||
|
Repurchase of common shares
|
(1,000.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,000.0
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net settlement of equity based awards
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
||||||
|
Principal payments under capital lease obligations
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from (repayment of) short-term borrowings
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity activity, net
|
19.0
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
(386.6
|
)
|
|
367.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(448.1
|
)
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
(477.1
|
)
|
|
(533.0
|
)
|
|
1,020.1
|
|
|
(438.2
|
)
|
||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1.9
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
102.0
|
|
|
33.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
137.7
|
|
||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(30.2
|
)
|
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(38.3
|
)
|
||||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
70.3
|
|
|
$
|
26.6
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
98.7
|
|
132
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the
52 week period ended
January 30, 2016
|
(in millions)
|
Signet
Jewelers Limited |
|
Signet UK
Finance plc |
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries |
|
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
$
|
98.6
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
325.7
|
|
|
$
|
215.0
|
|
|
$
|
(195.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
443.3
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(225.9
|
)
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(226.5
|
)
|
||||||
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Purchase of available-for-sale securities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from available-for-sale securities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
||||||
|
Acquisition of Zale Corporation, net of cash acquired
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(226.2
|
)
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
(228.7
|
)
|
||||||
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Dividends paid on common shares
|
(67.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(67.1
|
)
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity dividends paid
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(149.3
|
)
|
|
(46.6
|
)
|
|
195.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of redeemable convertible preferred shares, net of issuance costs
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares
|
5.0
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
5.0
|
|
||||||
|
Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from senior notes
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from term loan
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Repayments of term loan
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(25.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(25.0
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from securitization facility
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,303.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,303.9
|
|
||||||
|
Repayment of securitization facility
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2,303.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2,303.9
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
316.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
316.0
|
|
||||||
|
Repayments of revolving credit facility
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(316.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(316.0
|
)
|
||||||
|
Payment of debt issuance costs
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Repurchase of common shares
|
(130.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(130.0
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net settlement of equity based awards
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
||||||
|
Principal payments under capital lease obligations
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from (repayment of) short-term borrowings
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(47.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(47.1
|
)
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity activity, net
|
101.6
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
54.9
|
|
|
(156.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(98.8
|
)
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
(160.6
|
)
|
|
(202.9
|
)
|
|
195.6
|
|
|
(266.6
|
)
|
||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
2.1
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
166.5
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
193.6
|
|
||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(61.1
|
)
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(52.0
|
)
|
||||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
102.0
|
|
|
$
|
33.7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
137.7
|
|
133
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the
52 week period ended
January 31, 2015
|
(in millions)
|
Signet
Jewelers Limited |
|
Signet UK
Finance plc |
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries |
|
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
$
|
150.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
166.6
|
|
|
$
|
116.7
|
|
|
$
|
(153.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
283.0
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(219.8
|
)
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(220.2
|
)
|
||||||
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(18.9
|
)
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Purchase of available-for-sale securities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from available-for-sale securities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
||||||
|
Acquisition of Zale Corporation, net of cash acquired
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,431.1
|
)
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,429.2
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,669.8
|
)
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
(1,652.6
|
)
|
||||||
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Dividends paid on common shares
|
(55.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(55.3
|
)
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity dividends paid
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(953.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
953.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares
|
6.1
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
810.0
|
|
|
(828.9
|
)
|
|
6.1
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of redeemable convertible preferred shares, net of issuance costs
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from senior notes
|
—
|
|
|
398.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
398.4
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from term loan
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
400.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
400.0
|
|
||||||
|
Repayments of term loan
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from securitization facility
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,941.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,941.9
|
|
||||||
|
Repayment of securitization facility
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,341.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,341.9
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
260.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
260.0
|
|
||||||
|
Repayments of revolving credit facility
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(260.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(260.0
|
)
|
||||||
|
Payment of debt issuance costs
|
—
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(20.5
|
)
|
||||||
|
Repurchase of common shares
|
(29.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(29.8
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net settlement of equity based awards
|
(18.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(18.4
|
)
|
||||||
|
Principal payments under capital lease obligations
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from (repayment of) short-term borrowings
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
||||||
|
Intra-entity activity, net
|
(52.4
|
)
|
|
(402.4
|
)
|
|
1,957.9
|
|
|
(1,503.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(149.8
|
)
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
1,444.6
|
|
|
(95.9
|
)
|
|
124.1
|
|
|
1,320.9
|
|
||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
237.0
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
247.6
|
|
||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
0.7
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
(58.6
|
)
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(48.7
|
)
|
||||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
166.5
|
|
|
$
|
24.9
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
193.6
|
|
134
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION—UNAUDITED
The sum of the quarterly earnings per share data may not equal the full year amount as the computations of the weighted average shares outstanding for each quarter and the full year are calculated independently.
|
|
Fiscal 2017
Quarters ended |
||||||||||||||
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
April 30, 2016
|
|
July 30, 2016
|
|
October 29, 2016
|
|
January 28, 2017
|
||||||||
|
Sales
|
$
|
1,578.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,373.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,186.2
|
|
|
$
|
2,269.9
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
600.4
|
|
|
464.9
|
|
|
350.0
|
|
|
945.5
|
|
||||
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
|
146.8
|
|
|
81.9
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
287.8
|
|
||||
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
4.17
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
1.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2016
Quarters ended |
||||||||||||||
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
May 2, 2015
|
|
August 1, 2015
|
|
October 31, 2015
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
||||||||
|
Sales
|
$
|
1,530.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,410.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,216.4
|
|
|
$
|
2,392.6
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
565.9
|
|
|
490.8
|
|
|
367.7
|
|
|
1,016.0
|
|
||||
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
|
118.8
|
|
|
62.2
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
271.9
|
|
||||
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
3.43
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
3.42
|
|
135
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The directors review the effectiveness of Signet’s system of internal controls in the financial, operational, compliance and risk management areas.
Signet’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to help ensure that processes and procedures for information management are in place at all levels of the business. The disclosure controls and procedures aim to provide reasonable assurance that any information disclosed by Signet in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. The procedures are also designed to ensure that information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions to be made regarding required disclosure. Signet’s Disclosure Control Committee, which has a written charter, consists of the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Governance Officer and Corporate Secretary, Chief Legal, Risk and Corporate Affairs Officer, Senior Vice President - Financial Controller, Senior Vice President - Internal Audit and Enterprise Risk Management, Senior Vice President - Tax and Treasury, Vice President - Investor Relations and Treasurer, who consult with Signet’s external advisers and auditor, as necessary. These procedures are designed to enable Signet to make timely, appropriate and accurate public disclosures. The activities and findings of the Disclosure Control Committee are reported to the Audit Committee.
Based on their evaluation of Signet’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of
January 28, 2017
and in accordance with the requirements of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective and provide reasonable assurance that information regarding Signet is recorded, processed, summarized and reported and that the information is accumulated and communicated to management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting
Signet’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Management conducted an evaluation of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, management determined that Signet’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
January 28, 2017
.
Our independent registered public accountants, KPMG LLP, audited the consolidated financial statements of Signet for
Fiscal 2017
and have also audited the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
January 28, 2017
. An unqualified opinion has been issued thereon, the details of which are included within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
January 28, 2017
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Signet’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
136
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information concerning directors, executive officers and corporate governance may be found under the captions “Election of Twelve Directors,” “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance” and “Executive Officers of the Company” in our definitive proxy statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2017 Proxy Statement”), which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year. Such information is incorporated herein by reference. The information in the 2017 Proxy Statement set forth under the captions “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and “Report of the Audit Committee” is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information concerning executive compensation may be found under the captions “Executive Compensation,” “Report of the Compensation Committee” and “Director Compensation,” in the 2017 Proxy Statement. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information in the 2017 Proxy Statement set forth under the captions “Shareholders Who Beneficially Own At Least Five Percent of the Common Shares,” “Ownership by Directors, Director Nominees and Executive Officers” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information in the 2017 Proxy Statement set forth under the captions “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance,” “Board Committees” and “Transactions with Related Persons” is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information in the 2017 Proxy Statement set forth under the caption “Appointment of Independent Auditor” is incorporated herein by reference.
137
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
|
PAGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
(1) The following consolidated financial statements are included in Item 8:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Consolidated income statements for the fiscal years ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the fiscal years ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the fiscal years ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity for the fiscal years ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
(2) The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or are incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibits
|
|
2.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated February 19, 2014 by and among Signet Jewelers Limited, Carat Merger Sub, Inc. and Zale Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Zale Corporation on February 19, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Memorandum of Association of Signet Limited and Certificate of Incorporation on Change of Name to Signet Jewelers Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed September 11, 2008 (“Form 8-A”)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bye-laws of Signet Jewelers Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed September 10, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of common share certificate of Signet Jewelers Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-A).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Master Indenture dated as of November 2, 2001 among Sterling Jewelers Receivables Master Note Trust, as issuer, Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee, and Sterling Jewelers Inc., as Servicer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 21, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
2014-A Indenture Supplement, dated as of May 15, 2014, among Sterling Jewelers Receivables Master Note Trust, as issuer, Sterling Jewelers Inc., as servicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 21, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 2014, among Signet UK Finance plc, the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed September 10, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 15, 2014, among Sterling Jewelers Receivables Corp., as transferor, Sterling Jewelers Inc., as servicer, and Sterling Jewelers Receivables Master Note Trust, as issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 21, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of May 15, 2014 between Sterling Jewelers Inc., as seller, and Sterling Jewelers Receivables Corp., as purchaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 21, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Administration Agreement dated as of November 2, 2001 between Sterling Jewelers Receivables Master Note Trust, as issuer, and Sterling Jewelers Inc., as administrator (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 21, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Performance Undertaking dated as of May 15, 2014 by Signet Jewelers Limited, as performance guarantor, in favor of JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 21, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Preference Shares, Par Value $0.01 Per Share, of Signet Jewelers Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 3, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Depositary Agreement dated as of September 3, 2008 between Signet Jewelers Limited and Capita IRG Trustees Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 30, 2010).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2016, by and among Signet Jewelers Limited, as Parent, Signet Group Limited, Signet Group Treasury Services Inc. and Sterling Jewelers Inc. as borrowers, the additional borrowers from time to time party thereto, the financial institutions from time to time party thereto as lenders, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and the other parties party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 15, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibits
|
|
10.3†
|
|
Termination Protection Agreement between Sterling Jewelers Inc. and Mark S. Light (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Form on Form 8-K filed October 20, 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4†
|
|
Termination Protection Agreement between Sterling Jewelers Inc. and Michele Santana (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Form on Form 8-K filed October 20, 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5†
|
|
Termination Protection Agreement between Sterling Jewelers Inc. and Steven J. Becker (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Form on Form 8-K filed October 20, 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6†
|
|
Termination Protection Agreement between Sterling Jewelers Inc. and Edward Hrabak (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Form on Form 8-K filed October 20, 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7†
|
|
Termination Protection Agreement between Sterling Jewelers Inc. and George Murray (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Form on Form 8-K filed October 20, 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8*†
|
|
Separation Agreement dated January 29, 2017 between Sterling Jewelers Inc. and Ed Hrabak.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9†
|
|
Rules of the Signet Group 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed May 4, 2006).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10†
|
|
Signet Jewelers Limited Rules of the Sharesave Scheme (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed September 11, 2008 (File No. 333-153435)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11†
|
|
Signet Jewelers Limited Rules of the Irish Sharesave Scheme (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed September 11, 2008 (File No. 333-153435)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12†
|
|
Signet Jewelers Limited US Stock Option Plan 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed September 11, 2008 (File No. 333-153435)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13†
|
|
Signet Jewelers Limited International Share Option Plan 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed September 11, 2008 (File No. 333-153435)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14†
|
|
Signet Jewelers Limited UK Approved Share Option Plan 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed September 11, 2008 (File No. 333-153435)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15†
|
|
Rules of the Signet Group plc Sharesave Scheme (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.8 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed September 11, 2008 (File No. 333-153435)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16†
|
|
Rules of the Signet Group plc Sharesave Scheme (The Republic of Ireland) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.9 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed September 11, 2008 (File No. 333-153435)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17†
|
|
Signet Group plc International Share Option Plan 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.10 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed September 11, 2008 (File No. 333-153435)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18†
|
|
Signet Group plc UK Inland Revenue Approved Share Option Plan 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.11 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed September 11, 2008 (File No. 333-153435)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19†
|
|
Signet Group plc Employee Stock Savings Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed September 11, 2008 (File No. 333-9634)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20†
|
|
Signet Group plc US Share Option Plan 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed September 11, 2008 (File No. 333-134192)).
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibits
|
|
10.21†
|
|
Signet Group plc 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed September 11, 2008 (File No. 333-12304)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22†
|
|
Signet Group plc 1993 Executive Share Option Scheme (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed September 11, 2008 (File No. 333-8964)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23†
|
|
Signet Jewelers Limited Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by references to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed June 15, 2009 (File No. 333-159987)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24†
|
|
Form of Signet Jewelers Limited Omnibus Incentive Plan Performance Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Notice and Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 24, 2012).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25†
|
|
Form of Signet Jewelers Limited Omnibus Incentive Plan Time-Based Restricted Stock Award Notice and Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 24, 2012).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26†
|
|
Form of Letter of Appointment of Independent Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 22, 2012).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27†
|
|
Form of Deed of Indemnity for Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 30, 2010).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Voting and Support Agreement dated February 19, 2014 by and among Signet, Zale and The Z Investment Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Zale Corporation on February 19, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Investment Agreement, dated as of August 24, 2016, by and among Signet Jewelers Limited, Green Equity Investors VI, L.P. and Green Equity Investors Side VI, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 25, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Shareholders’ Agreement by and among Signet Jewelers Limited, Green Equity Investors VI, L.P., Green Equity Investors Side VI, L.P., LGP Associates VI-A LLC and LGP Associates VI-B LLC, dated as of October 5, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 6, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2016, by and among Signet Jewelers Limited, Green Equity Investors VI, LP, Green Equity Investors Side VI, L.P., LGP Associates VI-A LLC and LGP Associates VI-B LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 6, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
Accelerated Share Repurchase Master Confirmation Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2016, by and among Signet Jewelers Limited and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 29, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Accelerated Share Repurchase Supplemental Confirmation Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2016, by and among Signet Jewelers Limited and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 29, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1*
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1*
|
|
Subsidiaries of Signet Jewelers Limited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of independent registered public accounting firm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibits
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS*
|
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
*
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
†
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
142
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signet Jewelers Limited
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Date:
|
|
March 16, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Michele L. Santana
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Michele L. Santana
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
143
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated, on the date set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
March 16, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Mark Light
|
|
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Director)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Light
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
March 16, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Michele L. Santana
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michele L. Santana
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
March 16, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ H. Todd Stitzer
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Todd Stitzer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
March 16, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Dale W. Hilpert
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dale W. Hilpert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
March 16, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Marianne Miller Parrs
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marianne Miller Parrs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
March 16, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Thomas G. Plaskett
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas G. Plaskett
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
March 16, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Russell Walls
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell Walls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
March 16, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Virginia C. Drosos
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia C. Drosos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
March 16, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Helen E. McCluskey
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Helen E. McCluskey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
March 16, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Eugenia M. Ulasewicz
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eugenia M. Ulasewicz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
March 16, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Stack
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Stack
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Jonathan Sokoloff
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Sokoloff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Brian Tilzer
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Tilzer
|
|
|
144