PART I
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
Explanatory Note
Unless indicated otherwise, throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we may refer to Intersections Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries as “we,” “us,” “our” and "the Company."
Overview
We provide innovative software and data monitoring and analytics solutions that help consumers manage financial and personal risks associated with the proliferation of their personal data in the virtual and financial world. Under our Identity Guard
®
brand and other brands that comprise our Personal Information Services segment, we have helped consumers monitor, manage and protect against the risks associated with their identities and personal information for more than twenty years. We offer identity theft and privacy protection as well as credit monitoring services for consumers to understand, monitor, manage and protect their personal information and privacy. Under our Identity Guard
®
and Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
products, we help protect consumers against the risks associated with the inappropriate exposure of their personal information that can result in fraudulent use or reputation damage. Identity Guard
®
is offered through large and small organizations as an embedded product for either its employees or consumers, as well as directly to consumers through our direct marketing efforts. In 2017, we expanded our suite of Identity Guard
®
and Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
products. Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
offers robust early detection of potential risks, stretching beyond credit-centric risks to include online privacy risks, and provides personalized threat alerts with actionable steps to help keep our customers’ information private from the earliest stage possible. We believe that our suite of products and services offer consumers the most proactive and comprehensive identity theft monitoring and online privacy services available on the market today.
We have ongoing operations in one other segment, Insurance and Other Consumer Services. As part of our strategy to have a singular focus on our Personal Information Services segment, we recently sold: 1) the business comprising our Bail Bonds Industry Solutions segment in January 2017; 2) our Habits at Work business, the results of which are recorded in our Personal Information Services segment, in June 2017; and 3) the business comprising our Pet Health Monitoring segment in July 2017.
For additional information, please see Note
4
to our consolidated financial statements.
Corporate headquarter office transactions including, but not limited to, payroll, share based compensation and other expenses related to our Chairman and non-employee Board of Directors are reported in our Corporate business unit.
During 2017, we refinanced our existing senior secured indebtedness with Crystal Financial SPV LLC ("Prior Credit Agreement") with a new term loan facility with PEAK6 Investments, L.P. ("PEAK6 Investments").
We also executed amendments to the new term loan facility (together with the amendments, the "New Credit Agreement"), which had a principal outstanding amount of $21.5 million as of December 31, 2017. In connection with the New Credit Agreement, we paid PEAK6 Investments $1.5 million for the repurchase of common stock, and we received a total of $2.2 million for the issuance of a warrant to purchase 1.5 million shares of our common stock. The proceeds were, and will be, used for general corporate purposes, including investments in internal business development resources, internal technology systems and platforms, and continuous innovation of our products.
For additional information, please see Note
15
to our consolidated financial statements.
We were incorporated in Delaware in 1999. Our principal executive offices are located at 3901 Stonecroft Boulevard, Chantilly, Virginia 20151 and our telephone number is (703) 488-6100. Our website address is www.intersections.com. We make available on this website at www.intersections.com, under “Investors and Media,” free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed by our directors and executive officers and various other SEC filings, including amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such reports to the SEC.
We also make available on our website our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Principles, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Statement of Policy with Respect to Related Person Transactions, and the charters of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Risk Management Committee. This information is also available by written request to Investor Relations at our executive office address listed above. The information on our website, or on the site of our third-party service provider, is not incorporated by reference into this report. Our website address is included here only as an inactive technical reference.
Our Primary Business
We offer identity and privacy protection services to consumers through our Personal Information Services segment. This segment constituted approximately
96%
and
93%
of our revenue in the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively. We typically offer our services on a monthly or annual subscription basis. Our subscriber counts as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
were
1.1 million
and
1.2 million
, respectively.
Products and Services
Our Personal Information Services segment includes privacy, personal information security and identity theft monitoring and remediation services to help consumers understand, monitor, manage and protect against the risks associated with the inappropriate and sometimes criminal exposure of their personal information. Our current services include: providing credit reports, performing credit monitoring and providing educational credit scores and credit education; reports, monitoring and education about other personal information and risks, such as public records, identity validation, new account opening, social media footprint and Internet data risks; identity theft recovery services; identity theft cost reimbursement insurance of up to $1.0 million underwritten by a prominent insurance company; and software and other technology tools and services. Our resolution team applies its expertise to assist consumers with the remediation of confirmed identity theft events by providing pertinent documentation, communicating directly with creditors and placing fraud alerts on their behalf. We also offer breach response services to large and small organizations responding to compromises of sensitive personal information and other customer and employee data, mitigating potential damage to the customers and the corporate brand. We help these organizations notify the affected individuals and we provide the affected individuals with identity theft recovery and credit monitoring services. We continue to develop innovative new services and tools to add to our Identity Guard
®
portfolio and address the increasing awareness by consumers of the risks associated with their personal information.
We believe the threat to consumers’ personal information goes beyond traditional credit monitoring. The proliferation of data breaches, the pervasive use of social media and the increased sophistication of cyber criminals requires a solution for consumers’ needs in the identity protection space. To effectively identify, manage and remediate these new threats to consumers, we focused on expanding Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
in 2017. Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
is an identity theft monitoring and privacy advisory solution that can be personalized to each individual’s specific needs and is designed to protect the entire family. Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
maximizes the power of IBM Watson
™
cognitive computing to offer consumers the traditional credit monitoring services as well as non-credit related preventative alert services, using previously unmonitored unstructured data sources and processes and safe web browsing tools. Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
also equips users to reduce their risk of identity theft by educating individuals on existing risks to their personal information and recommending personalized remediation actions. Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
also offers social insights that help consumers and their families understand and responsibly manage their social media presence, including assistance to strengthen a consumer’s online privacy settings and remediation of potentially damaging posts. We believe it is the first product of its kind that uses natural language processing and machine learning to reveal insights from large amounts of unstructured data, delivered through the IBM Watson
™
technology platform. This platform is more scalable and adaptable than our legacy platform, which we believe will enable us to develop innovative new products and features for consumers and organizations more readily than in the past. As we focus on making Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
our leading offering to consumers and their families in the U.S. and Canada, we significantly invested in our product and business development group in 2017 and plan to continue this investment in 2018, as the pipeline of engagement leads grow and we continue to seek to convert the market opportunities into sustainable revenue.
Marketing and Distribution
We have a dual go-to-market strategy in the U.S. and Canada, through partner marketing and through direct-to-consumer marketing via search and display messaging. A substantial number of subscriptions in our products and services are canceled each year, as we believe is the case for similar products offered by our competitors in the identity theft monitoring industry. There is an investment cost to acquire a new subscriber and produce initial fulfillment materials, and therefore subscribers typically must be retained for a number of months in order to cover these costs. Our goal is to achieve a customer retention profile sufficient to achieve positive cash flow returns on these investment costs, above predetermined hurdle rates, across our entire subscription population.
In 2016 and 2017, we continued to expand our business relationships with new partners including retail, communication and other industrial partners, as well as partnering with employers to offer Identity Guard
®
as an employee benefit option. Building off our historically successful partner product distribution strategy, we have increased our internal business development capability in various channels more than 100% as we continue to pursue and contract with partners to bring our suite of differentiated and comprehensive products to their customers. We also made significant investments in our internal systems, member platforms and IT security compliance in order to build, enhance and prioritize security in our partner distribution channels and generate subscriber growth using an agile development process. We continue to develop, improve and expand upon all of these important initiatives.
We derive the majority of our revenue from historical agreements with U.S. financial institutions, which constituted approximately
55%
and
59%
of our Personal Information Services segment revenue in the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively. Revenue from our largest client, Bank of America, constituted approximately
44%
and
48%
of our Personal Information Services segment revenue in the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively. Bank of America ceased marketing of our services to new customers in 2011. Under our agreements with Bank of America, we continue to provide our services to the subscribers we acquired through Bank of America before December 31, 2011, subject to normal attrition and other ongoing adjustments by us or Bank of America, which may result in cancellation of certain subscribers or groups of subscribers. Bank of America, however, has the right to require us to cease providing services to its customers under existing subscriptions if the contract is terminated due to material breach by us or based on various events such as certain legal or regulatory changes, a party’s bankruptcy or insolvency, or other events. Furthermore, we are dependent on Bank of America to cooperate in continued servicing, including subscriber billing. We did not generate any new subscribers from Bank of America or other U.S. financial institution clients in 2017 or
2016, as all marketing of our products by our financial institution clients in the U.S. was terminated in both our Personal Information Services and Insurance and Other Consumer Services segments.
Sources of Supply
Our major source of data used in providing our services to consumers resulted from our continuing agreements with Equifax, Experian and TransUnion in both the U.S. and Canada. We believe we are an important customer to each of the three bureaus. The contract with Equifax expires in 2021. The Experian and TransUnion contracts may be terminated by them on 30 days’ and 60 days’ notice, respectively. Each of the credit reporting agencies also competes with us in providing credit scores, credit reports and limited credit monitoring services to subscribers.
In 2017, we renegotiated volume pricing, as well as any minimum fixed fees, of the supply of credit bureau data for our product features while also exploring alternative data sources. We have entered into long-term contracts with several other providers of data and analytics for our new Identity Guard® with Watson
™
product, including new data sources, advanced tools and analytical capabilities, and more timely notification of activities and more useable content. In certain contractual arrangements, we pay non-refundable license fees in exchange for the limited exclusive rights to use the data. We routinely review the effectiveness and cost of these exclusivity agreements in conjunction with our projected data usage and business forecasts and may make adjustments to our data mix and providers.
Industry Overview and Competition
Identity fraud has been the most reported consumer complaint in the U.S. for the past 15 years, according to the Federal Trade Commission. According to Javelin Strategy & Research, identity fraud continued its sharp upward trend in 2017, as the number of victims in the U.S. alone rose to 16.7 million, 8% higher than 2016 and 27% higher than 2015. Account takeover and card-not-present fraud were the primary drivers of the significant increase. The estimated cost of identity fraud in the U.S. in 2017 was nearly $17 billion, up from $16 billion in 2016. The increased use of e-commerce (including the use of mobile applications), social media and the Internet, as well as the amount of reported breaches of consumer data by large retailers, healthcare providers and other organizations has compounded the amount of identity theft and identity fraud events. As a result, the markets for our Personal Information Services segment are quite robust and growing continually. We operate in a highly competitive and rapidly changing environment. We believe that the competitive factors in our market include access to a breadth of identity and consumer transaction data, broad and effective service offerings, brand recognition, technology, effective and cost-efficient customer acquisition, customer satisfaction, price, quality and reliable customer service, and accurate identification of appropriate target markets for our business. Our principal competitors include the following companies and their subsidiaries or affiliates: Equifax; Experian; TransUnion; LifeLock; AllClear ID; and Davis & Henderson in Canada. We compete with these companies to provide our services to our distribution partners’ customers and our own direct subscribers. Some of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, human and other resources than we do, which may allow them to devote greater resources to developing, promoting and selling services, offer services at lower prices than we do and develop and launch new products and services more quickly or effectively than we do. In addition, competitor distribution to and retention of new subscribers may benefit from greater brand recognition and brand loyalty than we have or may be able to achieve.
Other
Our Insurance and Other Consumer Services segment includes insurance and membership products for consumers, delivered on a subscription basis. We are not planning to develop new business in this segment and are experiencing normal subscriber attrition due to ceased marketing and retention efforts. Some of our legacy subscriber portfolios have been cancelled, and our continued servicing of other subscribers may be cancelled as a result of actions taken by one or more financial institutions.
Prior to July 31, 2017, our Pet Health Monitoring segment included the health and wellness monitoring products and services for veterinarians and pet owners through our former subsidiary, i4c Innovations LLC ("i4c" or "Voyce"). Voyce generated substantial losses from formation to 2016 and, after concentrated efforts, was unable to generate an acceptable level of revenue. Effective July 31, 2017, we sold Voyce to a newly-formed entity of which Michael R. Stanfield, our Executive Chairman and President, is a minority investor. The results of this segment are reported as discontinued operations in accordance with U.S. GAAP in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. For additional information, please see Note
4
to our consolidated financial statements.
Prior to January 31, 2017, our Bail Bonds Industry Solutions segment included the automated service solutions for the bail bonds industry provided by Captira Analytical LLC ("Captira"). Effective January 31, 2017, we divested our ownership in Captira. This segment’s operating results, along with the operating results of Habits at Work, have not had a major effect on our consolidated financial results and are not classified as a discontinued operation. For additional information, please see Note
4
to our consolidated financial statements.
Government Regulation
We are subject to a wide variety of federal, state, foreign and local laws and regulations, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"), the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act and comparable state laws that are patterned after the FTC Act, and other similar laws, rules and regulations. We also are subject to federal and state laws and regulations relating to the channels in which we sell and market our services, as well as a consent order with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as described below. We incur significant costs to operate our business and monitor our compliance with these laws, regulations, and consent decrees. Any changes to the existing applicable laws or regulations, or any determination that other laws or regulations are applicable to us, could increase our costs or impede our ability to provide our services to our customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition, and prospects. In addition, any of these laws or regulations may be subject to revision, and we cannot predict the impact of such changes on our business. Further, any determination that we have violated any of these laws, regulations, or consent decrees may result in liability for fines, damages, or other penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition, and prospects.
Laws Governing Consumer Marketing, Product Distribution and Administration
Marketing, distribution and ongoing administration of our consumer products and services are subject to various federal and state laws, depending on the circumstances, including the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, CAN-SPAM Act, Electronic Fund Transfer Act, U.S. Card Act, and both federal and state laws prohibiting unfair, deceptive or abusive practices or requiring disclosure of information about various products and services. Similar laws and regulations govern our business in Canada, and include federal and provincial laws.
Other state or federal laws may apply, depending on the nature of the products and services or marketing channel or method. For example, the insurance products we sell are subject to state insurance laws, including license requirements and oversight and other restrictions and requirements regarding the sale and administration of insurance and some of our products are governed by state laws governing discount medical plans or other programs.
Privacy and Information
Consumer marketing and products generally are governed by federal and state laws regarding the use, sharing and protection of personal information. Specific state or federal laws may apply depending on the nature of the products and services or marketing channel or method. For example, we are subject to the federal FCRA and similar state laws governing credit information, as well as to state and federal privacy laws governing financial institutions or products, including the federal Gramm Leach Bliley Act and certain state laws governing the sharing or use of personal information by financial institutions and their affiliates.
Privacy laws and regulations that may apply to our business in Canada include the federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and federal and provincial laws and regulations regarding credit report information.
With the growing public concern regarding privacy and the collection, distribution, and use of consumer personal information, we believe we are in an environment in which there is an increased regulatory scrutiny concerning data collection and use practices and the provision and marketing of services, like ours, that seek to protect that information. We expect that kind of scrutiny to continue as the marketplace for services like ours continues to develop.
Laws Governing Financial Products and Institutions
Our financial institution clients are subject to federal laws and regulations that govern financial institutions and their affiliates, financial products, financial information privacy, financial accounts such as credit cards, debit cards, demand deposit accounts and mortgages, and payment systems and processes. Our financial institution clients are subject to oversight by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, CFPB and other federal or state regulatory agencies. In part based on the requirements of those regulatory agencies, our financial institution clients are required to exercise oversight of us, and often require us by contract to comply with certain of the laws and regulations that apply directly to them.
Federal and state agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the CFPB, state attorneys general and other state regulatory agencies, including state insurance regulators, continue to review and monitor the consumer finance and other industries for unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices and take enforcement actions. These agencies may, at times, pursue administrative proceedings or litigation to enforce the laws and regulations subject to its jurisdiction. In the proceedings, the agencies can obtain cease and desist orders, which include orders for restitution to consumers or rescission of contracts, as well as other types of relief, including, under certain circumstances, substantial monetary penalties.
In 2015, we entered into a consent order with the CFPB in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, we agreed to implement a satisfactory compliance plan to comply with the Order and to provide a progress update. We also submitted an amended compliance plan to the CFPB in early 2017.
Other Laws and Regulations
Other laws and regulations may apply to one or more of our business segments generally or specifically based on the activities of that segment. For example, state insurance laws and laws governing discount medical programs or other discount programs apply to certain of the products in our Insurance and Other Consumer Services segment.
Intellectual Property
We consider certain of our processes, systems, methodologies, databases, tangible and intangible materials, software and trademarks to be proprietary. We rely on a combination of trade secret, patent, copyright, trademark and other laws, license agreements and non-disclosure, non-competition and other contractual provisions, and technical measures, to protect our proprietary and intellectual property rights. Certain features and functions of our products and services use intellectual property under license from third parties, which we at times sub-license to our clients and others. We may depend on certain of those licenses to operate parts of our products. When we market our services in client-branded programs, we rely on licenses from our clients to use their trademarks.
We depend upon the skills, knowledge and experience of our management, as well as that of our other employees, advisors, consultants and contractors, none of which are patentable. To help protect our know-how, and any inventions for which patents may be difficult to obtain or enforce, we require all of our employees, consultants, advisors and other contractors to enter into confidentiality and inventions agreements that prohibit the disclosure of confidential information and, where applicable, require disclosure and assignment to us of the ideas, developments, discoveries and inventions important to our business.
Cybersecurity
Recently, there has been an increase in the number of major consumer data breaches, including a breach of one of the largest consumer reporting agencies. We continue to review those incidents for insights into how we can reduce our risk of a breach and incorporate those observations into our continuous monitoring of our cybersecurity controls, which we believe meet or exceed industry best practices. In addition, we believe the recent breaches have not had an adverse effect on our business, subscriber base, or vendor relationships; however, there can be no assurances that they will not have an adverse effect in the future. We will continue to evaluate our business and the financial or other impact, if any, of the consumer reporting agency breach and the response of that organization.
We have adopted data security policies, data breach mitigation policies and data breach response policies and procedures, which we regularly review and update. Our data breach response policies and procedures delineate the actions that we will implement in the event that we discover or have reason to believe that a data breach has occurred, including but not limited to convening our Data Breach Response Team, terminating the breach, initiating an investigation, preserving relevant evidence, escalating and disseminating information and action plans throughout our organization, promptly identifying and notifying affected individuals, contacting regulators and law enforcement as appropriate and mitigating damage or loss incurred by affected individuals and the Company.
The Risk Management Committee of our Board of directors meets regularly with the members of management who lead our cyber and information security efforts. During those meetings, the Committee receives detailed reports and presentations regarding our cyber and information security, data breach risk mitigation and data breach response programs, engages with the responsible executives and reports any comments or concerns to management and the full Board.
Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our employees from purchasing or selling our stock or other securities based upon material, non-public information, including but not limited to a data or information security breach. Employees must obtain from our Chief Legal Officer written pre-clearance for any such purchase or sale, which the Chief Legal Officer will not issue in the event of a known material data or information security breach, the existence of which has not been made public.
Employees
As of
December 31, 2017
, we had 362 employees, compared to 422 employees as of
December 31, 2016
. Our future performance depends significantly on the continued service of our key personnel. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining arrangements. We believe our employee relations are good.
Financial Information about Segments and Geographic Areas
Please see Note
20
to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for financial information about our segments and geographic areas.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
We believe the following risk factors, as well as the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are material to an understanding of our company. Any of the following risks as well as other risks and uncertainties discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects and cause the value of our stock to decline. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that are currently deemed immaterial, also may affect us.
Risks Related to our Business
Our revenue decreased in the year ended
December 31, 2017
as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2016
, and there can be no assurances that our revenue will not continue to decline.
In the year ended
December 31, 2017
, our consolidated revenue declined by approximately
9.1%
from
2016
primarily due to a decline in revenue from our financial institution clients, which is primarily the result of normal subscriber attrition within the portfolios we continue to service. We may continue to lose existing subscribers and the corresponding revenue due to a number of factors, including normal attrition and potential actions taken by our financial institution clients or us. We need to replace the revenue from the loss of new and existing subscribers with our other products and services, and there can be no assurances that we will be successful in doing so. Our failure to increase our revenue or grow our profitability likely could continue to adversely affect the value of our common stock.
We incurred consolidated losses from continuing operations of
$11.8 million
and
$3.4 million
in the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively. We may continue to incur substantial expenses from increased overhead costs to grow our sales and business development departments, and we cannot give assurances of our future profitability.
We incurred significant consolidated loss from continuing operations in
2017
and
2016
primarily due to the decline in revenue in our Personal Information Services and Insurance and Other Consumer Services segments. In 2017, we divested our non-core businesses (including the Pet Health Monitoring and Bail Bonds Industry Solutions segments), which allows us to concentrate our resources to improve our core identity theft protection subscribers, revenue and results. However, there can be no assurances that we will not continue to report significant consolidated operating losses in future periods. We cannot predict whether we will be able to become profitable on an annual basis in the future, as we may not generate sufficient revenue to obtain and maintain profitability and expect to continue to incur significant expenses to maintain and expand our Identity Guard
®
and Identity Guard® with Watson
™
products. We also may incur additional costs associated with our regulatory compliance as we are subject to a wide variety of federal, state and local laws and regulations, which may make it more difficult for us to achieve future profitability. If we are unable to become profitable, we may not be able to execute our business plan, our prospects may be harmed, and our stock price could further decline.
We are dependent upon our Personal Information Services segment for substantially all of our revenue, and our revenue from that segment may continue to decrease, primarily due to the attrition of subscribers obtained through our historical financial institution clients.
Approximately
96%
of our revenue in the year ended
December 31, 2017
was derived from our Personal Information Services segment. We are entirely dependent on revenue from this segment. Our revenue for this segment declined in
2017
by approximately
6.4%
from
2016
as our subscriber base obtained through our historical financial institution clients continued to decline in excess of new subscribers in our suite of Identity Guard
®
products. Therefore, adverse developments in this business segment could have a significant adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We have lost subscribers in prior years, and may lose subscribers in future years, due to numerous factors, including changing subscriber preferences; subscriber dissatisfaction; cancellations required by marketing partners, or for regulatory or other reasons; competitive price pressure; recurring billing issues, such as changes to their credit card billing practices or policies; credit card or other billing vehicle declines or turnover, including as a result of a refinancing or account cancellation; and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, our total number of subscribers may continue to decline during 2018. Our failure to increase our revenue likely would continue to adversely affect the value of our common stock.
Laws requiring the free issuance of credit reports by credit reporting agencies, and other services that must be provided by credit reporting agencies, could impede our ability to obtain new subscribers or retain existing subscribers and could have a material adverse effect on our business.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act provides consumers the ability to receive one free consumer credit report per year from each major consumer credit reporting agency and requires each major consumer credit reporting agency to provide the consumer a credit score along with the consumer’s credit report for a reasonable fee as determined by the FTC. In addition, the Fair Credit Reporting Act and state laws give consumers other rights with respect to the protection of their credit files at the credit reporting agencies. For example, the Fair Credit Reporting Act gives consumers the right to place “fraud alerts” at the credit reporting agencies, and the laws in approximately 40 states give consumers the right to place “freezes” to block access to their credit files. The rights of consumers to
obtain free annual credit reports and credit scores from consumer reporting agencies, and to place fraud alerts and credit freezes directly with them, could cause consumers to perceive that the value of our services is reduced or replaced by those benefits, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We remain dependent on our historical financial institution clients to continue to service and bill a material portion of our subscribers.
We historically depended upon our agreements with a small number of financial institutions in the U.S. to derive a significant portion of our revenue. For example, in
2017
and
2016
, we derived approximately
55%
and
59%
, respectively, of our Personal Information Services segment revenue from our agreements with U.S. financial institutions. Under these contracts, our right to continue to service subscribers after termination of a contract by a financial institution varies based on the specific contract terms. Under some contracts, we may continue to provide our services to the existing subscribers, and the financial institution must provide certain applicable services, for varying time periods. Under other contracts, the financial institution may require us at any time to cease providing services under existing subscriptions. Financial institutions under most contracts also may require us to cease providing services to their customers under existing subscriptions if the contract is terminated for material breach by us or based on various events such as certain legal or regulatory changes, a party’s bankruptcy or insolvency, or other events. Even in contracts under which we have a right to continue to provide our services to existing subscribers after termination, we often are substantially dependent on those clients to cooperate in continued servicing, including continued billing by those clients. If those financial institutions do not perform their contractual obligations with respect to the servicing of existing subscribers, or otherwise do not cooperate in our continued servicing of those subscribers, or, where permitted under our contracts, they terminate our servicing of the subscribers, we could lose significant current sources of revenue, and those losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We could lose our access to data from any of the three major credit reporting agencies, each of which competes with us, which could cause demand for our services to decrease, affect our profitability and have a material adverse effect on our business.
We rely on the major credit reporting agencies, Equifax, Experian and TransUnion, in both the U.S. and Canada to provide us with essential credit-related data for our consumer identity theft protection services. The Experian and TransUnion contracts may be terminated by them on 30 days’ and 60 days’ notice, respectively, while the contract with Equifax expires in 2021. Each of the three major credit reporting agencies competes with us by providing credit information directly to consumers, and may decide to stop supplying data to us on a timely manner or at all, or to significantly increase the costs they charge us for their data. Any change, interruption, deterioration or termination of our relationship with one or more of the three credit reporting agencies would be disruptive to our business and could cause us to lose subscribers or incur increased expenses. We may not be successful in maintaining our relationships on the current terms with the three credit reporting agencies and may not be able to continue to obtain data from them on acceptable terms or at all. Furthermore, there can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain data from alternative or additional sources if our current sources become unavailable or too costly.
Our failure to protect personal data could cause us to expend capital and resources to protect against future security breaches or other unauthorized access, result in litigation costs, liability and damage to our reputation and business.
We collect, distribute and protect nonpublic and sensitive personal data in delivering our services. We are subject to the risk that unauthorized users might access that data, technical issues might release or expose that data to unauthorized users or human error might cause the wrongful dissemination of that data. If we experience a security breach or other unauthorized access to information, the integrity of our services may be affected. We continue to incur significant costs to protect against security breaches or other mishaps and to minimize the adverse effects of a data breach, were one to occur. Moreover, any public perception that we mishandle personal information could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain clients and subscribers, or maintain key supplier relationships, and could subject us to legal claims and liability and damage to our reputation. In addition, unauthorized third parties might alter information in our databases, which could adversely affect both our ability to market our services and the credibility of our information.
Our business is dependent on the secure operation of our websites, mobile apps, working environments, storage, security and other data systems as well as the operation of the Internet generally. Our business involves the storage and transmission of users’ personal information, and security breaches could expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, litigation and potential liability. Like many companies, we are the target of frequent and repeated cyber-attacks of varying levels of sophistication. Many companies regularly disclose security breaches, some of which have involved intentional attacks. We may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate or prevent rapidly evolving types of cyber-attacks. Attacks may be targeted at us, our clients, our suppliers or others. If an actual or perceived breach of our security occurs, client, customer and/or supplier perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and we could lose clients, customers and/or suppliers. Actual or anticipated attacks and risks may cause us to incur increasing costs, including costs to deploy additional personnel and protection technologies, train employees, and engage third party experts and consultants.
If our security measures are circumvented, our personal information or that of our subscribers could be misappropriated, causing interruption in our operations, damaging our information systems or those of our users, or otherwise damaging our reputation and business. Any compromise of our security could result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation, and a loss of confidence in our security measures, which could harm our business.
We rely on various technologies, including without limitation encryption and authentication technology licensed from third parties to provide the security and authentication to effectively secure transmission of confidential information, including without limitation customer payment card numbers. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments may result in the technology used by us to fail to protect personal data from being breached or compromised. Data breaches can also occur as a result of non-technical issues.
Under payment card rules and our contracts with our card processors and clients, if there is a breach of payment card information that we store, we could be liable to the payment card issuing banks for their cost of issuing new cards and related expenses. In addition, if we fail to follow payment card industry security standards, even if there is no compromise of customer information, we could incur significant fines or lose our ability to give customers the option of using payment cards to fund their payments or pay our fees. If we were unable to accept payment cards, our business would be seriously damaged.
Our servers are also vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins, and similar disruptions, including “denial-of-service” type attacks. We may need to expend significant resources to protect against security breaches or to address problems caused by breaches. Security breaches, including any breach suffered by us or by persons with whom we have commercial relationships, that result in the unauthorized release of our users’ personal information, could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability.
Many states have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving their personal data. Federal and state laws in the U.S. provide for more than 45 regulatory and notification regimes, all of which we are subject to, and additional requirements may be instituted in the future. In the event of a data security breach, these mandatory disclosures often lead to widespread negative publicity. In addition, complying with such numerous and complex regulations in the event of a data security breach is often expensive, difficult and time consuming, and the failure to comply with these regulations could subject us to regulatory scrutiny and additional liability and harm our reputation.
Any actual or perceived security breach, whether successful or not and whether or not attributable to the failure of our services or our information technology systems, as well as our failure to promptly and appropriately react to a breach, would likely harm our reputation, adversely affect market perception of our services, and cause the loss of customers and strategic partners. Our property and business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for losses or failures that may occur. Our third-party insurance coverage will vary from time to time in both type and amount depending on availability, cost and our decisions with respect to risk retention.
We recognized impairment charges in the past and may be required to recognize impairment charges in the future that could materially affect our financial results.
We recorded one-time intangible and other asset impairment charges of $8.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to the cessation of operations in our Pet Health Monitoring business. Additionally, we assess our goodwill and other intangible assets as well as our other long-lived assets as and when required by U.S. GAAP to determine whether they are impaired and, if they are, we record appropriate impairment charges. We had no goodwill impairment charges in 2017 or 2016, but it is possible that we may be required to record additional significant impairment charges in the future and, if we do so, our operating income could be materially adversely affected.
The New Credit Agreement provides our lenders with a first-priority lien against substantially all of our assets and contains certain restrictions on our ability to take certain actions. We cannot provide assurance that we will maintain compliance with the financial and other restrictive covenants under the New Credit Agreement.
We are subject to a number of financial and other restrictive covenants under the New Credit Agreement. These covenants include restrictions that prohibit or otherwise limit our ability to pay dividends and repurchase stock, incur additional indebtedness, make certain investments and other payments, enter into acquisitions, encumber or dispose of assets or engage in certain other types of transactions, and also require that we maintain certain minimum cash balances, financial ratios and EBITDA levels (as defined in the New Credit Agreement and adjusted for certain non-cash, non-recurring and other items) during specified periods. Failure to comply with any of the covenants under the New Credit Agreement could result in a default under the facility, which could cause the lenders to declare all obligations immediately due and payable and exercise their lien on substantially all of our assets. We cannot provide assurance that we will maintain compliance with such covenants for future periods, or, if necessary, be able to amend the financial or restrictive covenants contained therein or enter into new credit arrangements to maintain liquidity in the future. We have taken and may continue to take actions including, but not limited to, delaying or forgoing capital investments, reducing marketing or other expenditures compared to current plans, and/or renegotiating or seeking a waiver or amendment of the terms of the New Credit Agreement as means of maintaining compliance with these covenants.
We are substantially dependent on third party suppliers and service providers, and our clients and their service providers, to market and provide our products, and failures by those third parties or our clients could harm our business and prospects.
Our consumer products and services are substantially dependent on third party suppliers, including providers of credit and other data, analytics, and software and other technology, including without limitation, our relationship with IBM under which we utilize its Watson
™
technology and trademarks in some of our products and services. Our failure to develop and maintain these third party relationships could harm our ability to provide our products and services. We also rely on various third party service providers, including outsourced telemarketing vendors, customer service providers, network and systems hosts and other providers. In some arrangements we rely on our clients or their service providers, including the marketing of products, billing of subscribers and customer service.
Failure of any of our third party suppliers or service providers, or our clients or their service providers, to satisfy our contracts or requirements, or to comply with applicable laws and regulations, could cause us to lose subscribers or clients, expose us to private lawsuits or governmental investigations or proceedings, cause us to be liable for damages and fines, or harm our reputation. Any such event could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
We could be unable to meet our future capital requirements to grow our business, which could adversely impact our financial condition and growth strategy.
In November 2017, we amended our existing credit agreement in which we received additional operating funds at a higher borrowing rate. We could need to continue to raise additional funds in the future in order to operate and expand our business. Our ability to meet our future capital requirements and grow our business by investing in and marketing our products and services could be materially adversely affected if we are unable to maintain compliance with the covenants under the New Credit Agreement or otherwise obtain financing in the future. There can be no assurances that additional funds will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available to us on a timely basis, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate one or more of our product development programs or any future commercialization efforts. Our inability to obtain additional financing could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
A failure of any of the insurance companies that underwrite the insurance products or related benefits provided as part of our insurance services, or refusal by those insurance companies to provide the expected insurance, could harm our business.
Certain of our insurance services include or depend on insurance products, or are dependent on group insurance policies under which the customers for our services are the insureds. Adverse conditions in the economy could cause financial instability among one or more of those insurance companies. The failure of any of those insurance companies, or refusal by them to provide the expected insurance, could require us to remove the affected insurance from our services, cause us to lose customers or clients, or expose us to liability claims by our customers or clients.
If we experience system failures or interruptions in our telecommunications or information technology infrastructure, our revenue could decrease and our reputation could be harmed.
Our operations depend upon our ability to protect our telecommunications and information technology systems against damage or system interruptions from natural disasters, technical failures and other events beyond our control. We receive credit and other data electronically, and this delivery method is susceptible to damage, delay or inaccuracy. A significant portion of our business involves telephonic customer service as well as mailings, both of which depend upon the data generated from our computer systems. Unanticipated problems with our telecommunications and information technology systems may result in a significant system outage or data loss, which could interrupt our operations and have a material adverse impact on our business, including the loss of revenue, clients or customers or exposure to liability claims.
We may launch products and services in fields and markets that are new to us, and may be exposed to new risks that could impede the success of our efforts or result in unforeseen liabilities or expenses.
We are exploring or developing other new products and services, including new privacy products, which also may involve new risks. If we are unable to manage these new risks, our efforts to develop and launch new products and services may not be successful, or we may incur unforeseen liabilities or expenses, including product liability, regulatory violation, data or privacy breaches, intellectual property infringement or contract claims, which may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We depend on key members of our management and other key personnel.
We depend on key members of our management. We do not maintain key person life insurance on our senior management. Loss of one or more of these key individuals, particularly our Executive Chairman or our other executive officers, could have a material adverse effect on our business. We also believe that our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to attract, retain and motivate
skilled managerial, marketing and other personnel, and a failure to attract and retain those personnel may have a material adverse impact on our business.
Our ability to use our net operating loss carry-forwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited, which could potentially result in increased tax liabilities for us in the future.
As of
December 31, 2017
, we had approximately
$10.6 million
of a federal net operating loss carry-forward. Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership over a three year period), the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carry-forwards and other pre-change tax attributes (such as research tax credits) to offset its post-change taxable income may be limited. Due to the nature of our closely-held stockholders, we have not performed an analysis to determine if there were any prior year ownership changes, which would limit our ability to utilize the federal net operating loss carry-forward. If we earn net taxable income in future years, our ability to use our net operating loss carry-forward to offset taxable income will be subject to our future analysis of ownership changes and, as a result, may be subject to limitations, which could potentially result in increased future tax liability to us.
The recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017 may materially impact our future operating results and tax accounting policies.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act may have future implications to our financial reporting which, due to the varying assessment date provisions, may be materially different than what is completely reflected or disclosed in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. Changes to certain limitations and deductible provisions may have a favorable or unfavorable impact on future operating results and cash taxes including, but not limited to, repeal of the corporate alternative minimum tax, change to covered employees under Section 162(m), limitations on the deduction of interest expense from debt financing and expensing of qualifying depreciable assets. Ongoing analysis of the income tax reform may potentially impact our business, financial conditions and results of operations in one or more future periods.
Our Canadian business exposes us to operational, economic and currency risks.
Our Canadian operations represented approximately
8%
and
7%
of our consolidated revenue in
2017
and
2016
, respectively, and a component of our strategy includes expanding and adding to our marketing partner relationships in Canada as well as adding Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
as a premier product offering. Our ability to successfully conduct business in Canada is affected by many of the same risks we face in our U.S. operations, as well as unique costs and difficulties of managing businesses in Canada. Transacting business with Canadian partners and vendors has made us subject to Canadian economic conditions, particularly currency exchange rate fluctuations, increased regulations, quotas, tariffs, and political factors, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations as our business in Canada continues to expand. Further, we may be exposed to new forms of competition not present in our domestic markets, as well as subject to potentially different demographic tastes and preferences for our products.
We may not be able to consummate acquisitions or investments that are accretive or which improve our financial condition.
A component of our strategy may include selectively acquiring assets or businesses or making strategic investments in order to increase cash flow and earnings or diversify or expand our product offerings. This depends upon a number of factors, including our ability to identify acceptable acquisition or investment candidates, consummate transactions on favorable terms, successfully integrate acquired assets and obtain financing to support our growth and expansion, and many other factors beyond our control. We may encounter delays or other problems or incur substantial expenses in connection with seeking acquisitions that could negatively impact our operating results. In connection with any acquisitions or investments, we could issue stock that would dilute our stockholders, incur substantial debt, assume known, contingent and unknown liabilities and/or reduce our cash reserves. In addition, legal or regulatory requirements, availability of financing or other factors may prevent us from consummating acquisitions of membership agreements or customer portfolios offered by our clients, which may have an adverse impact on our relationships with those clients or our continued receipt of revenue from those portfolios or agreements. Acquisitions may also require material infrequent charges and could result in adverse tax consequences, impairment of goodwill, substantial depreciation and amortization, increased interest expense, deferred compensation charges, and the amortization of amounts related to deferred compensation and identifiable purchased intangible assets, any of which could negatively impact our results of operations in one or more future periods.
We may not realize planned benefits from any acquisitions.
From time to time we review opportunities for acquisitions of other businesses or material assets that would expand our business or otherwise offer growth opportunities to us. In connection with our acquisitions, we may experience unforeseen difficulties, expenses and delays as we attempt to integrate the acquired assets and businesses into our existing operations. These difficulties may require significant management attention and financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of existing operations. Any acquisition or investments by us involves risks, including:
|
|
•
|
unexpected losses of key employees, customers and suppliers of the acquired operations;
|
|
|
•
|
difficulties in integrating the financial, technological and management standards, processes, procedures and controls of the acquired businesses with those of our existing operations;
|
|
|
•
|
challenges in managing the increased scope, geographic diversity and complexity of our operations;
|
|
|
•
|
establishing the internal controls and procedures that we are required to maintain under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; and
|
|
|
•
|
mitigating contingent or assumed liabilities or unexpected costs.
|
Competition could reduce our market share or decrease our revenue.
We operate in a highly competitive business market. Our competitors may provide products and services comparable or superior to those provided by us, or at lower prices, adapt more quickly to evolving industry trends or changing market requirements, increase their emphasis on products and services similar to ours, enter the markets in which we operate or introduce competing products and services. Any of these factors could reduce our market share or decrease our revenue. Many of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do. Several of our competitors offer products and services that are similar to, or that directly compete with, our products and services. Competition for new subscribers for our products and services is also intense. We also compete directly with the credit reporting agencies that control the credit file data that we use to provide our services. One or more of these credit reporting agencies may not make available to us or our customers the same features that they may offer in direct competition with us.
Our inability to develop and offer services that are attractive to the growing number of consumers who utilize wireless devices other than personal computers to access online services could adversely affect our business.
The number of people who access services through devices other than personal computers, including mobile phones, smart phones, handheld computers, tablets, and other mobile devices, has increased dramatically in recent years and is projected to continue to increase. The services we develop for users of these alternative devices may not be attractive to users. Despite the expected growth in mobile devices, there is no guarantee that we will be able to effectively monetize our mobile applications and generate meaningful revenue in the future. If our mobile applications are not widely adopted or sufficiently profitable, or if we fail to continue to innovate and introduce enhanced mobile applications and other services for users of these alternative devices, our business could be adversely affected.
As new devices, platforms, and technologies are continually being released, it is difficult to predict the problems we may encounter in developing versions of our services for use with those devices, platforms, and technologies, and we may need to devote significant resources to the creation, support, and maintenance of such offerings. We are dependent on the interoperability of our mobile applications with popular mobile operating systems that we do not control, such as Android and iOS, and any changes in such systems that degrade our applications’ functionality or give preferential treatment to competitive products could adversely affect usage of our mobile applications. Additionally, if we are slow to develop new services and technologies that are compatible with these devices, platforms, and technologies, or if our competitors are able to achieve those results more quickly than us, we will fail to capture a significant share of an increasingly important portion of the market for online services, which could adversely affect our business.
Our growth depends upon developing and successfully introducing new products and services that generate client and consumer interest, including new data sources, advanced tools and analytical capabilities, more timely notification of activities and more useable content. Since late 2016, we continue to unveil our new Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
product to various marketing channels and partners. We have made, and may make, significant investments in new products and services, including development costs and prepayment of royalties and fees to third party providers. Our failure to develop, introduce or expand successfully our products and services could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.
Events such as a security breach at one of our partners that result in a significant number of our members’ personally identifiable information being compromised or that otherwise interfaces with our systems could result in a large number of identity-related events that in turn could severely strain our operations and have a negative impact on our business.
Events such as a security breach at a large organization (including major financial institutions, retailers, and Internet service providers) could compromise the personally identifiable information of a significant number of our consumers. Any such event could in turn result in a large number of identity-related events that we must address, placing severe strain on our operations. Any failure in our ability to appropriately and timely process and address a large number of identity-related events taking place at the same time could result in a loss of members, harm to our reputation, and other damage to our business. Moreover, any related remediation services we provide may not meet member expectations and further exacerbate these risks. Furthermore, if these events result in significant claims made under our identity theft insurance, this could negatively impact our insurance premiums and our ability to continue to provide what we refer to as our guarantee on a cost-effective basis, or at all.
If the material weaknesses identified in our internal control over financial reporting persist or if we fail to establish and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, our ability to accurately report our financial results could be adversely affected.
In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In connection with that assessment, a material weakness was identified in our internal controls over accounting for share based compensation, and a material weakness was identified in our internal controls over accounting for revenue recognition. Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 and Rule 1-02(b) of Regulation S-X define a material weakness as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis. The identified material weaknesses are further described in Part II, Item 9A of this report.
Our remediation efforts regarding these material weaknesses are also described in Part II, Item 9A of this report. While we are confident that that our remediation plans will remediate the identified material weaknesses, it is possible that our remedial measures may not be sufficient or may take longer than anticipated. If our remedial measures are insufficient to address the material weaknesses on a timely basis, our consolidated financial statements may contain material misstatements and we could be required to restate our financial results. Even after the identified material weaknesses have been remediated, investors may lose confidence in our reported financial information and the market price of our shares of common stock may decline.
Risks Related to Government Regulation
Changes in legislation or regulations governing consumer privacy and other consumer protection aspects may affect our ability to collect, distribute, and use personally identifiable information.
There has been increasing public concern about the use of personally identifiable information and vulnerability of security practices intended to protect it. As a result, many federal, state, and foreign government bodies and agencies have adopted or are considering adopting laws and regulations regarding the collection, disclosure, protection and use of personally identifiable information. In addition to government regulation, privacy advocates and industry groups may propose new and different self-regulatory standards that apply to us. Because the interpretation and application of privacy, data protection and other consumer protection laws are still uncertain, it is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our existing data management practices or the features of our services. If this is the case, in addition to the possibility of fines, lawsuits, and other claims, we could be required to fundamentally change our business activities and practices or modify our service offerings, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to retain our customers and partners. Any inability to adequately address privacy concerns, even if unfounded, or comply with applicable privacy, data protection or other consumer protection laws, regulations, and policies, could result in additional cost and liability to us, damage our reputation, affect our ability to attract new customers and maintain relationships with our existing customers, and adversely affect our business. Furthermore, the costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, the laws, regulations, and policies that are applicable to the businesses of our enterprise customers and strategic partners may limit the use and adoption of, and reduce the overall demand for, our services. Privacy concerns, whether valid or not, may inhibit market adoption of our services.
Our Personal Information Services segment and Insurance and Other Consumer Services segments are subject to a wide range of U.S. and foreign laws and regulations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our Personal Information Services and Insurance and Other Consumer Services segments are subject to a wide variety of U.S. federal and state laws and regulations. Our business in Canada is subject to similar laws. For additional information on the laws and regulations that may have an effect on our business, see “Business—Government Regulation” above.
Many of the laws in the U.S. and Canada that apply to us or our clients are or may become the subject of revision and addition, the issuance of rules, regulations, guidance and interpretations by government agencies, and rulings and interpretations by courts and other tribunals. We incur significant costs to operate our business in compliance with these laws and regulations, and to make changes to our business as needed to comply with legal and regulatory changes. We have made and may continue to make changes to our business and operations as a result of changes with respect to these laws or regulations. These changes have increased our costs and reduced our revenue, and we may make further changes that have such effect. Further, scrutiny of the sales, marketing and administration of add-on products by financial institution and financial product regulators has resulted in the termination of almost all marketing of our products by financial institutions and cancellation of certain subscribers. The effect of this combination of laws, regulations, reviews and proceedings is difficult to estimate, and any or a combination of them, or changes to them, may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
We and our clients are subject to legal actions and proceedings, including consumer class action litigation and government agency investigations and enforcement actions, which could require us to incur substantial expenses, pay damages, fines and penalties, lose subscribers and clients, and change our business practices, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Because we operate in highly regulated industries and must comply with various foreign, federal, state and local laws, we may be subject to claims and legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. These legal actions may include private class action lawsuits, and investigations and enforcement actions by governmental authorities. We cannot predict the outcome of any actions or proceedings, and the cost of responding to investigations or claims and defending against private actions, investigations or government enforcement actions might be material. If we are found liable in any actions or proceedings, or are required to indemnify our clients or others for their expenses or liability, we may have to pay substantial damages, fines and penalties, lose subscribers or clients, suffer harm to our reputation, and be required change the way we conduct our business, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, as a result of these investigations, proceedings or actions, or other regulatory oversight, our financial institution clients have taken, and we may take, remedial actions including the issuing of refunds and/or cancellation of subscriptions, and our clients may seek indemnification or contribution from us relating to those remedial actions, which could require us to incur substantial expenses, pay damages, fines and penalties, lose subscribers and clients, and change our business practices, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and cash flow.
We believe that the CFPB, along with other federal agencies including the OCC, are continuing to review policies and practices of financial institutions and their service providers with respect to add-on or ancillary products. The CFPB, OCC and FDIC have entered into public consent orders with Bank of America and several other financial institutions with respect to such products, including in some cases our identity theft protection products. Under these consent orders, financial institutions have agreed, among other things, to make restitution of fees collected from their customers, take other remedial actions, and cease marketing of the applicable products until their compliance plans are approved by regulators, and pay penalties. We cannot predict whether these governmental reviews of products marketed through financial institutions will continue, or whether they may include reviews by state government agencies. One or more financial institutions may seek indemnification from us, and we or the financial institutions may be subject to enforcement proceedings or private class actions. We may receive requests for information directly from federal or state agencies. We provided information to the CFPB in response to the previously reported Civil Investigative Demand regarding the provision of “ancillary products related to credit card or deposit accounts” and a subsequent request for voluntary production of information received in January 2014. In July 2015, a consent order with the CFPB was entered in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. We agreed to make various changes to our disclosures and business practices. We also agreed under the consent order to be subject to certain ongoing injunctive relief and other compliance requirements, which we do not believe substantially changes our existing practices or business but may result in us incurring additional costs associated with compliance or redress. Based on the entry of the consent order, we paid the total penalty amount of $1.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2015, and in February 2016 we paid the remaining $63 thousand of refunds to 661 subscribers.
We may continue to incur material costs as a result of any other regulatory review and scrutiny, or class action litigation, which could reduce the operating results of our Personal Information Services or Insurance and Other Consumer Services segments and our cash flows provided by operations. Any finding that we have violated a law or regulation or our consent order with the CFPB, filing of an enforcement action or class action litigation against us, or entry by us into a consent order or settlement may have a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial condition.
Judicial decisions, CFPB rule-making or amendments to the Federal Arbitration Act could render the arbitration agreements the Company uses illegal or unenforceable.
The Company includes arbitration provisions in its consumer agreements and terms of use. These provisions are designed to allow the Company to resolve any customer disputes through individual arbitration rather than in court and explicitly provide that all arbitrations will be conducted on an individual and not on a class basis. Thus, the Company’s arbitration agreements, if enforced, have the effect of shielding the Company from class action liability. The Company’s arbitration agreements do not generally have any impact on regulatory enforcement proceedings. The Company takes the position that the arbitration provisions in its consumer agreements and terms of use, including class action waivers, are valid and enforceable; however, the enforceability of arbitration provisions is often challenged in court. If those challenges are successful, the Company’s arbitration and class action waiver provisions could be unenforceable, which could subject the Company to additional litigation, including additional class action litigation. In addition, the U.S. Congress has considered legislation that would generally limit or prohibit mandatory arbitration agreements in consumer contracts. Any judicial decisions, legislation or other rules or regulations that impair the Company’s ability to enter into and enforce consumer arbitration agreements and class action waivers could significantly increase the Company’s exposure to class action litigation as well as litigation in plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions, which would be costly and could have a material adverse effect.
Liabilities we establish or charges we incur for private or governmental legal proceedings may adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.
We periodically analyze currently available information about current legal proceedings and make a determination of the probability of loss and provide a range of possible loss when we believe that sufficient and appropriate information is available. We accrue a liability for those contingencies where the incurrence of a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If a loss is probable and a range of amounts can be reasonably estimated but no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount in the range, then the minimum of the range is accrued. We do not accrue a liability when the likelihood that the liability has been incurred is believed to be probable but the amount cannot be reasonably estimated or when the likelihood that a liability has been incurred is believed to be only reasonably possible or remote. For contingencies where an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible and the impact could potentially be material, we disclose the nature of the contingency and, where feasible, an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss.
We may determine in the future that we must establish a reserve or incur a charge for all or a portion of our legal proceedings for which we did not previously establish a reserve or take a charge. We also may determine that we are required to increase a reserve if we determine that the reserve we previously established was inadequate, or record an additional charge if we incur liabilities in excess of liabilities that we have previously recorded. Such charges or liabilities could be significant and could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.
We may be subject to assertions that taxes must be collected based on sales and use of our services in various states, which could expose us to liability and cause material harm to our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Currently, our products and services are subject to sales and use taxes in certain states to which we are currently compliant, and taxability is generally determined by statutory state laws and regulations, as well as an assessment of nexus. Whether sales of our services are subject to additional states’ sales and use taxes is uncertain, due in part to the unique nature of our services and the relationships through which our services are offered, as well as changing state laws and interpretations of those laws. One or more additional states may seek to impose sales or use tax or other tax collection obligations on us, whether based on sales by us or our resellers or clients, including for past sales. A successful assertion that we should be collecting sales or other related taxes on our services could result in substantial audit defense fees and tax liabilities for past sales, discourage clients from offering or billing for our services, or otherwise cause material harm to our business, financial condition and results of operations.
There are several applicable and potential governmental regulatory matters being considered by the U.S. Supreme Court, Congress and a number of U.S. states that may impact us by requiring remote online sellers to collect sales tax on their revenue. For example, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear during the current spring term the appeal from the South Dakota Supreme Court of the matter of
South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc
. This case is expected to directly revisit the 25-year-old “doctrine” previously established by the Supreme Court in
Quill Corp. v. North Dakota
, which requires a minimum physical presence within a state in order to permit the state to impose sales tax on revenue derived within that state. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that these and other attempts to impose sales, income or other taxes on online sales may have on our business. Any new or revised taxes would likely increase our cost of doing business online and could reduce demand for our services and create additional administrative and compliance burdens, all of which could adversely affect our results of operations.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
If our efforts to protect the proprietary nature of the intellectual property related to our current or future products and services, including our Identity Guard
®
and Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
products, are not adequate, we may not be able to compete effectively in our market.
Our success depends in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property, including our Identity Guard
®
and Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
products. We rely upon a combination of patents, trademarks, trade secret protection, confidentiality and license agreements to protect the intellectual property related to our current products and services. However, these measures afford only limited protection and might be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented by third parties. The measures we take to protect our intellectual property may not be sufficient or effective, and in some instances we have not undertaken comprehensive searches with respect to certain of our intellectual property. We have limited protections in countries outside the U.S., such as registrations for key trademarks. Moreover, our competitors may independently develop similar intellectual property.
Our patents may not adequately protect our intellectual property or prevent others from designing around our patents. If the breadth or strength of protection provided by the patents we own, license or pursue with respect to any of our current or future products and services is threatened, it could threaten our ability to commercialize any of our current or future products and services.
We also rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect proprietary know-how that is not patentable, processes for which patents are difficult to enforce and any other elements of our product development processes that involve proprietary know-how, information or technology that is not covered by patents. Although we require all of our employees to assign their inventions to us, and endeavor to execute confidentiality agreements with all of our employees, consultants, advisors and any
third parties who have access to our proprietary know-how, information or technology, we cannot be certain that we have executed such agreements with all parties who may have helped to develop our intellectual property or had access to our proprietary information, nor that our agreements will not be breached. We cannot guarantee that our trade secrets and other confidential proprietary information will not be disclosed or that competitors will not otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or independently develop substantially equivalent information and techniques. If we are unable to prevent material disclosure of the intellectual property related to our technologies to third parties, we will not be able to establish or maintain a competitive advantage in our market, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Any disclosure to or misappropriation by third parties of our confidential proprietary information could enable competitors to quickly duplicate or surpass our technological achievements, thus eroding our competitive position in our market.
We may be subject to intellectual property rights claims, which may be costly to defend, could require the payment of damages and could limit our ability to use certain technologies.
Companies in the Internet, technology, data management, wireless communications, wearable technology and other industries own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets, and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. The technologies we own or license from others may not be able to withstand challenge by the owners of any third-party claims or rights. Any intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming, and expensive to litigate or settle, and could divert management resources and attention. An adverse determination also could prevent us from offering our products and services to others and may require that we procure substitute products or services for these customers and clients and could require us to pay damages, which could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
With respect to any intellectual property rights claim, we may have to pay damages or stop using technology found to be in violation of a third party’s rights. We may have to seek a license for the technology, which may not be available on reasonable terms and may significantly increase our operating expenses. The technology also may not be available for license to us at all. As a result, we may also be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant effort and expense. If we cannot license or develop technology for the infringing aspects of our business, we may be forced to limit our product and service offerings and may be unable to compete effectively.
We have received confidential and proprietary information from third parties. In addition, we employ individuals who were previously employed at other technology companies. We may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise improperly used or disclosed confidential information of these third parties or our employees’ former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial cost and be a distraction to our management and employees.
We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or the patents of our licensors, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.
Competitors may infringe our intellectual property or the intellectual property of our licensors that are licensed to us. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. In addition, if we or one of our future collaborators were to initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering our current products and services, or one of our future products or services, the defendant could counterclaim that our patent is invalid and/or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the U.S., defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity and/or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the U.S. PTO, or made a materially misleading statement, during prosecution. Third parties may also raise similar claims before the U.S. PTO, even outside the context of litigation. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity and/or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on our current or future product candidates. Such a loss of patent protection could have a material adverse impact on our business.
Litigation or interference proceedings may fail and, even if successful, may result in substantial costs and distract our management and other employees. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be unsuccessful, it could have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock. Finally, we may not be able to prevent, alone or with the support of our licensors, misappropriation of our trade secrets or confidential information, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the U.S.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.
Filing, prosecuting and defending patents, trademarks and copyrights on products throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent, trademark or copyright protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent, trademark or copyright protection, but where enforcement is not as strong as that in the U.S. These products may compete with our products in jurisdictions where we do not have any issued or licensed patents, trademarks or copyrights and our intellectual property claims or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from so competing.
Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biopharmaceuticals, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing products in violation of our proprietary rights generally. Proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial cost and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our stock price is volatile and may continue to fluctuate significantly over a short period of time.
The trading price of our common stock is volatile. In the past, our stock price has declined in response to period-to-period fluctuations in our revenue, expenses and operating results. In certain periods where our operating results have been below historical amounts, the price of our common stock decreased significantly following earnings announcements. In addition, our stock price may continue to fluctuate significantly in the future as a result of a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:
|
|
•
|
the timing and rate of subscription cancellations and additions;
|
|
|
•
|
the decrease in our revenue and subscriber base in 2017 and the possible continued reduction in either or both in 2018;
|
|
|
•
|
our continued losses from continuing operations;
|
|
|
•
|
the loss of a key client or a change by a key client in the servicing of our products and services;
|
|
|
•
|
enforcement actions or other proceedings against us or our client;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to introduce new and improve existing products and services on a timely basis;
|
|
|
•
|
the success of competing products and services by our competitors;
|
|
|
•
|
the demand for consumer subscription services generally;
|
|
|
•
|
amount and frequency of future dividend payments and share repurchases, if any;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to generate and maintain cash flows provided by operations, including our ability to secure any additional debt or equity financing;
|
|
|
•
|
the ability of third parties to support our services; and
|
|
|
•
|
general economic conditions.
|
We do not expect to declare or pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock since the first quarter of 2014. Because we currently intend to retain all cash we generate to fund the growth of our business and the New Credit Agreement currently prohibits us from declaring and paying ordinary cash dividends, we do not expect to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. As a result, if we do not declare or pay dividends you may not receive any return on an investment in our common stock unless you sell our common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.
Insiders have substantial control over us and could delay or prevent a change in corporate control, which may harm the market price of our common stock.
Loeb Holding Corp., which is controlled by one of our directors, owns approximately 40% of our outstanding common stock, and Michael R. Stanfield, our Executive Chairman and President, owns approximately 7% of our outstanding common stock. In addition, our other executive officers and other directors collectively own significant shares of our outstanding common stock, and these insiders may acquire additional shares of common stock or other securities in the future. These stockholders may have interests that conflict with the other public stockholders. If these stockholders act together, they could have the ability to significantly influence or control the management and affairs of our company and potentially determine the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election and removal of directors and any sale of the Company. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership may harm the market price of our common stock by delaying, discouraging or preventing a change in control transaction.
If we sell shares of our common stock or derivative securities in future financings, stockholders may experience immediate dilution and, as a result, our stock price may decline.
We may from time to time issue additional shares of common stock or derivative securities, including at a discount from the current trading price of our common stock. As a result, our stockholders could experience immediate dilution upon the sale or issuance of any shares of our common stock at such discount. In addition, as opportunities present themselves, we may enter into financing or similar arrangements in the future, including the issuance of debt securities, preferred stock, warrants or common stock. If we issue common stock or securities convertible, exchangeable or exercisable into common stock, our common stockholders would experience additional dilution and, as a result, our stock price may decline.
We are a smaller reporting company and are taking advantage of certain reduced governance and disclosure requirements, including that our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We cannot be certain if the omission of reduced disclosure requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.
Currently, we are a “smaller reporting company,” meaning that our outstanding common stock held by nonaffiliates had a value of less than $75 million. As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Our auditors are not required to attest to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. As a result, investors and others may become less comfortable with the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls and the risk that any material weaknesses or other deficiencies in internal controls go undetected may increase. In addition, as a smaller reporting company, we intend to take advantage of our ability to provide certain other less comprehensive disclosures in our SEC filings, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements in annual reports and simplified executive compensation disclosures. Consequently, it may be more challenging for investors to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects, as the information we provide to stockholders may be different from what you might receive from other public companies in which you hold shares.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide this information.
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
The following is a summary of our principal leased facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Lease Expiration
|
|
Segment
|
Chantilly, VA
|
|
2019
|
|
Personal Information Services
|
Santa Clara, CA
|
|
2020
|
|
Personal Information Services
|
Rio Rancho, NM
|
|
2023
|
|
Personal Information Services
|
Arlington Heights, IL
|
|
2019
|
|
Insurance and Other Consumer Services
|
We believe that our facilities will support our future business requirements or that we will be able to lease additional or replacement space, if needed, on reasonable terms. Certain properties are utilized by all of our segments and in such cases the property is reported in the segment with highest usage.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the normal course of business, we may become involved in various legal proceedings. Based upon our experience, we do not believe that these proceedings and claims will result in a material adverse change in our business or financial condition, and as of
December 31, 2017
, we do not have any significant liabilities accrued. Please refer to “Legal Proceedings” in Note
16
to our consolidated financial statements for information regarding certain judicial, regulatory and legal proceedings.
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Our executive officers are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Michael R. Stanfield
|
|
67
|
|
Executive Chairman and President
|
Melba Amissi
|
|
44
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
Ronald L. Barden
|
|
54
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Duane L. Berlin
|
|
59
|
|
Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel
|
Tracy M. Ward
|
|
40
|
|
Vice President, Principal Accounting Officer
|
Michael R. Stanfield
co-founded CreditComm, the predecessor to Intersections, in May 1996, and has served as our Chairman of the Board of Directors since that time. Since January 2018, Mr. Stanfield has served as Executive Chairman and President, pursuant to which he has assumed the duties as the principal executive officer of the Company. Prior to January 2018, Mr. Stanfield served as Chairman and Founder from inception until January 2018. Mr. Stanfield joined Loeb Partners Corporation, an affiliate of Loeb Holding Corporation, in November 1993 and served as a Managing Director at the time of his resignation in August 1999. Mr. Stanfield has been involved in management information services and direct marketing through investments and management since 1982, and has served as a director of CCC Information Services Inc. and BWIA West Indies Airways. Prior to beginning his operational career, Mr. Stanfield was an investment banker with Loeb, Rhoades & Co. and Wertheim & Co. He holds a B.B.A. in Business Administration from Emory University and an M.B.A. from Columbia University.
Melba Amissi
joined the Company in 2001 and has served in a number of management positions over the years. Most recently, Ms. Amissi served as Senior Vice President, Chief Risk Officer since January 1, 2017, and prior to that became Senior Vice President, Chief of Staff on November 17, 2014, after previously serving as Vice President of Legal and Business Affairs since 2007. In these roles, Ms. Amissi was responsible for managing, directing, and implementing compliance and risk for marketing, technology, operations, customer care, information security, and human resources. Ms. Amissi received her business degree from Randolph Macon Woman’s College and she is a Certified Information Privacy Professional and IAPP Member since 2016.
Ronald L. Barden
has served as our Chief Financial Officer since September 2014. Mr. Barden previously served as Chief Financial Officer of N1Health LLC, an early stage company building a national network of physician practices that deliver root-cause medicine, since April 2013. Prior to that Mr. Barden served as Chief Financial Officer of WellAWARE Systems, Inc., a wellness monitoring solutions company, from November 2010 through March 2013, and as Chief Financial Officer of Agility Healthcare Solutions from March 2007 until its sale to GE Healthcare, and then as Chief Financial Officer of GE-Agility business unit until November 2010. Mr. Barden also held various positions at Heilig-Meyers Company and spent ten years in public accounting at Deloitte & Touche and Ernst & Young. Mr. Barden holds a B.B.A and a M.B.A. from The College of William and Mary and is a Certified Public Accountant.
Duane L. Berlin
has served as our Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel since September 2016. Mr. Berlin has practiced business law for more than three decades. His areas of expertise include securities law, mergers
and acquisitions, commercial contracts, marketing and privacy law. Mr. Berlin is listed in the Martindale-Hubbell Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers as an AV Preeminent attorney. Mr. Berlin has served as General Counsel for the Counsel of American Survey
Research Organizations since 1998, a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals since 2005, a Licensed U.S. Coast Guard Captain since 2007 and a member of the Board of Directors for The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research since 2011. Mr. Berlin received his bachelor's degree from Brandeis University and his Juris Doctorate, Cum Laude, from the University of Miami, where he served as an associate editor of the University of Miami Law Review and a member of the Society of the Wig and Robe. Mr. Berlin also completed studies at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government. Mr. Berlin is a member of the bars of Virginia and Connecticut. Previously, Mr. Berlin served as managing principal of Lev & Berlin, P.C., and practiced law with Cummings & Lockwood.
Tracy M. Ward
has served as our Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer since August 2014, after having previously served as the Director of Treasury and Financial Reporting since February 2010 and in other financial management positions since joining the Company in October 2006. Prior to joining Intersections, Ms. Ward worked for Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation in various accounting positions and was employed on the tax staff of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP. Ms. Ward holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting and a Master’s degree in Accounting and Income Tax from Virginia Tech and is a Certified Public Accountant.
PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Company’s common stock trades on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “INTX.” As of February 28, 2018, the common stock was held by approximately 75 stockholders of record and an estimated 1,897 additional stockholders whose shares were held for them in street name or nominee accounts. Set forth below are the high and low closing sale prices per share and dividends declared on our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Composite Tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Price per Share
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Dividends Paid per Common Share
|
2017 Quarter ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
$
|
4.19
|
|
|
$
|
3.55
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
June 30, 2017
|
$
|
5.73
|
|
|
$
|
3.96
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
September 30, 2017
|
$
|
4.74
|
|
|
$
|
2.96
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
$
|
3.36
|
|
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Price per Share
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Dividends Paid per Common Share
|
2016 Quarter ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
$
|
2.94
|
|
|
$
|
2.25
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
$
|
2.23
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
$
|
4.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
We do not expect to declare or pay dividends for the foreseeable future. Dividends are considered quarterly by the Board of Directors and may be paid only when approved by the Board of Directors. Future dividends, if any, will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as our Board of Directors may, in its discretion, consider relevant. Under the New Credit Agreement, we are prohibited from declaring and paying ordinary cash dividends.
In April 2005, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program under which we can repurchase our outstanding shares of common stock from time to time, depending on market conditions, share price and other factors. As of
December 31, 2017
, we had approximately $15.3 million remaining under our share repurchase program. The repurchases may be made on the open market, in block trades, through privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, and the program may be suspended or discontinued at any time. However, we are prohibited from repurchasing any shares of common stock under the New Credit Agreement.
We did not repurchase any shares during the three months ended
December 31, 2017
. The common share purchases described in the table below represent the withholding of restricted stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of the related restricted stock during the three months ended
December 31, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased
|
|
Average Price Paid per Share
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan
|
|
|
(in thousands, except average price paid per share)
|
October 1, 2017 to October 31, 2017
|
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
3.37
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
November 1, 2017 to November 30, 2017
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
December 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide this information.
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with our financial statements and accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, based on current expectations and related to future events and our future financial performance, that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many important factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors,” “Forward-Looking Statements” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
We provide innovative software and data monitoring and analytics solutions that help consumers manage financial and personal risks associated with the proliferation of their personal data in the virtual and financial world. Under our Identity Guard
®
brand and other brands that comprise our Personal Information Services segment, we have helped consumers monitor, manage and protect against the risks associated with their identities and personal information for more than twenty years. We offer identity theft and privacy protection as well as credit monitoring services for consumers to understand, monitor, manage and protect their personal information and privacy. Under our Identity Guard
®
and Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
products, we help protect consumers against the risks associated with the inappropriate exposure of their personal information that can result in fraudulent use or reputation damage. Identity Guard
®
is offered through large and small organizations as an embedded product for either its employees or consumers, as well as directly to consumers through our direct marketing efforts. In 2017, we expanded our suite of Identity Guard
®
and Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
products. Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
offers robust early detection of potential risks, stretching beyond credit-centric risks to include online privacy risks, and provides personalized threat alerts with actionable steps to help keep our customers’ information private from the earliest stage possible. We believe that our suite of products and services offer consumers the most proactive and comprehensive identity theft monitoring and online privacy services available on the market today.
We have ongoing operations in one other segment, Insurance and Other Consumer Services. As part of our strategy to have a singular focus on our Personal Information Services segment, we recently sold: 1) the business comprising our Bail Bonds Industry Solutions segment in January 2017; 2) our Habits at Work business, the results of which are recorded in our Personal Information Services segment, in June 2017; and 3) the business comprising our Pet Health Monitoring segment in July 2017.
For additional information, please see Note
4
to our consolidated financial statements.
Corporate headquarter office transactions including, but not limited to, payroll, share based compensation and other expenses related to our Chairman and non-employee Board of Directors are reported in our Corporate business unit.
Given these divestitures, in 2017 we began to present the results of operations and provide management's discussion and analysis primarily on a consolidated basis.
During 2017, we refinanced our existing senior secured indebtedness under the Prior Credit Agreement with the New Credit Agreement, which had a principal outstanding amount of $21.5 million as of December 31, 2017. In connection with the New Credit Agreement, we paid PEAK6 Investments $1.5 million for the repurchase of common stock, and we received a total of $2.2 million for the issuance of a warrant to purchase 1.5 million shares of our common stock. The proceeds were, and will be, used for general corporate purposes, including investments in internal business development resources, internal technology systems and platforms, and continuous innovation of our products. For additional information, please see Note
15
to our consolidated financial statements.
Personal Information Services
Our Personal Information Services segment includes privacy, personal information security and identity theft monitoring and remediation services to help consumers understand, monitor, manage and protect against the risks associated with the inappropriate and sometimes criminal exposure of their personal information. Our current services include: providing credit reports, performing credit monitoring and providing educational credit scores and credit education; reports, monitoring and education about other personal information and risks, such as public records, identity validation, new account opening, social media footprint and Internet data risks; identity theft recovery services; identity theft cost reimbursement insurance of up to $1.0 million underwritten by a prominent insurance company; and software and other technology tools and services. Our resolution team applies its expertise to assist consumers with the remediation of confirmed identity theft events by providing pertinent documentation, communicating directly with creditors and placing fraud alerts on their behalf. We also offer breach response services to large and small organizations responding to compromises of sensitive personal information and other customer and employee data, mitigating potential damage to the customers and the corporate brand. We help these organizations notify the affected individuals and we provide the affected individuals with identity theft recovery and credit monitoring services. We continue to develop innovative new services and tools to add to our Identity Guard
®
portfolio and address the increasing awareness by consumers of the risks associated with their personal information.
We believe the threat to consumers’ personal information goes beyond traditional credit monitoring. The proliferation of data breaches, the pervasive use of social media and the increased sophistication of cyber criminals requires a solution for consumers’ needs in the identity protection space. To effectively identify, manage and remediate these new threats to consumers, we focused on expanding Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
in 2017. Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
is an identity theft monitoring and privacy advisory
solution that can be personalized to each individual’s specific needs and is designed to protect the entire family. Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
maximizes the power of IBM Watson
™
cognitive computing to offer consumers the traditional credit monitoring services as well as non-credit related preventative alert services, using previously unmonitored unstructured data sources and processes and safe web browsing tools. Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
also equips users to reduce their risk of identity theft by educating individuals on existing risks to their personal information and recommending personalized remediation actions. Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
also offers social insights that help consumers and their families understand and responsibly manage their social media presence, including assistance to strengthen a consumer’s online privacy settings and remediation of potentially damaging posts. We believe it is the first product of its kind that uses natural language processing and machine learning to reveal insights from large amounts of unstructured data, delivered through the IBM Watson
™
technology platform. This platform is more scalable and adaptable than our legacy platform, which we believe will enable us to develop innovative new products and features for consumers and organizations more readily than in the past. As we focus on making Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
our leading offering to consumers and their families in the U.S. and Canada, we significantly invested in our product and business development group in 2017 and plan to continue this investment in 2018, as the pipeline of engagement leads grow and we continue to seek to convert the market opportunities into sustainable revenue.
In 2016 and 2017, we continued to expand our business relationships with new partners including retail, communication and other industrial partners, as well as partnering with employers to offer Identity Guard
®
as an employee benefit option. Building off our historically successful partner product distribution strategy, we have increased our internal business development capability in various channels more than 100% as we continue to pursue and contract with partners to bring our suite of differentiated and comprehensive products to their customers. We also made significant investments in our internal systems, member platforms and IT security compliance in order to build, enhance and prioritize security in our partner distribution channels and generate subscriber growth using an agile development process. We continue to develop, improve and expand upon all of these important initiatives.
We derive the majority of our revenue from historical agreements with U.S. financial institutions, which constituted approximately
55%
and
59%
of our Personal Information Services segment revenue in the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively. Revenue from our largest client, Bank of America, constituted approximately
44%
and
48%
of our Personal Information Services segment revenue in the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively. Bank of America ceased marketing of our services to new customers in 2011. Under our agreements with Bank of America, we continue to provide our services to the subscribers we acquired through Bank of America before December 31, 2011, subject to normal attrition and other ongoing adjustments by us or Bank of America, which may result in cancellation of certain subscribers or groups of subscribers. Bank of America, however, has the right to require us to cease providing services to its customers under existing subscriptions if the contract is terminated due to material breach by us or based on various events such as certain legal or regulatory changes, a party’s bankruptcy or insolvency, or other events. Furthermore, we are dependent on Bank of America to cooperate in continued servicing, including subscriber billing. We did not generate any new subscribers from Bank of America or other U.S. financial institution clients in 2017 or 2016, as all marketing of our products by our financial institution clients in the U.S. was terminated in both our Personal Information Services and Insurance and Other Consumer Services segments.
Recently, there has been an increase in the number of major consumer data breaches, including a breach of one of the largest consumer reporting agencies. We continue to review those incidents for insights into how we can reduce our risk of a breach and incorporate those observations into our continuous monitoring of our cybersecurity controls, which we believe meet or exceed industry best practices. In addition, we believe the recent breaches have not had an adverse effect on our business, subscriber base, or vendor relationships; however, there can be no assurances that they will not have an adverse effect in the future. We will continue to evaluate our business and the financial or other impact, if any, of the consumer reporting agency breach and the response of that organization.
Other
Our Insurance and Other Consumer Services segment includes insurance and membership products for consumers, delivered on a subscription basis. We are not planning to develop new business in this segment and are experiencing normal subscriber attrition due to ceased marketing and retention efforts. Some of our legacy subscriber portfolios have been cancelled, and our continued servicing of other subscribers may be cancelled as a result of actions taken by one or more financial institutions.
Prior to July 31, 2017, our Pet Health Monitoring segment included the health and wellness monitoring products and services for veterinarians and pet owners through our former subsidiary, i4c Innovations LLC ("i4c" or "Voyce"). Voyce generated substantial losses from formation to 2016 and, after concentrated efforts, was unable to generate an acceptable level of revenue. Effective July 31, 2017, we sold Voyce to a newly-formed entity of which Michael R. Stanfield, our Executive Chairman and President, is a minority investor. The results of this segment are reported as discontinued operations in accordance with U.S. GAAP in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. For additional information, please see Note
4
to our consolidated financial statements.
Prior to January 31, 2017, our Bail Bonds Industry Solutions segment included the automated service solutions for the bail bonds industry provided by Captira Analytical LLC ("Captira"). Effective January 31, 2017, we divested our ownership in Captira. This segment’s operating results, along with the operating results of Habits at Work, have not had a major effect on our consolidated
financial results and are not classified as a discontinued operation. For additional information, please see Note
4
to our consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
Management Estimates
In preparing our consolidated financial statements, we make estimates and assumptions that can have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations. The application of our critical accounting policies requires an evaluation of a number of complex criteria and significant accounting judgments by us. In applying those policies, our management uses its judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in the determination of certain estimates. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions, judgments or conditions. We have identified the following policies as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our consolidated results of operations. For further information on our critical and other accounting policies, please see Note
2
to our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue on 1) identity theft protection services, 2) insurance services and 3) other monthly membership products and transaction services.
Our products and services are offered to consumers principally on a monthly subscription basis. Subscription fees billed by our clients are generally billed directly to the subscriber’s credit card, mortgage bill or demand deposit accounts. Subscription fees billed by us are generally billed directly to the subscriber’s credit card except for arrangements under which subscription fees are paid to us by our clients on behalf of the subscriber. The prices to subscribers of various configurations of our products and services range generally from $4.99 to $25.00 per month. As a means of allowing customers to become familiar with our services, our subscriptions periodically may be offered with trial, delayed billing or guaranteed refund periods. No revenues are recognized until applicable trial periods are completed.
Identity Theft Protection Services
We recognize revenue from our services when: a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists as we maintain signed contracts with all of our clients and paper and electronic confirmations with individual purchasers, b) delivery has occurred, c) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed as sales are generally based on contract or list prices and payments from organizations are collected within
30
days with no significant write-offs, and d) collectability is reasonably assured as individual customers pay by credit card which has limited our risk of non-collection.
Revenue for monthly subscriptions is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the service period. We also generate revenue through a collaborative arrangement, which involves joint marketing and servicing activities. We recognize our share of revenues and expenses from this arrangement.
Revenue for annual subscription fees must be deferred if the subscriber has the right to cancel the service and the service is earned over the year. Annual subscriptions include subscribers with full refund provisions at any time during the subscription period and pro-rata refund provisions. Revenue related to annual subscriptions with full refund provisions is recognized on the expiration of these refund provisions. Revenue related to annual subscribers with pro-rata provisions is recognized based on a pro-rata share of revenue earned. An allowance for discretionary subscription refunds is established based on our historical experience. For subscriptions with refund provisions whereby only the prorated subscription fee is refunded upon cancellation by the subscriber, deferred subscription fees are recorded when billed and amortized as subscription fee revenue on a straight-line basis over the subscription period, generally
one year.
We record revenue on a gross basis in the amount that we bill the subscriber when our arrangements provide for us to serve as the primary obligor in the transaction, we have latitude in establishing price and we bear the credit risk for the amount billed to the subscriber. We also provide services for which certain clients are the primary obligors directly to their customers. We record revenue in the amount that we bill certain clients, and not the amount billed to their customers, when our client is the primary obligor, establishes the price to the customer and bears the credit risk. Revenue from these arrangements is recognized on a monthly basis when earned, which is at the time we provide the service.
Insurance Services
We recognize revenue from our services when: a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists as we maintain paper and electronic confirmations with individual purchasers, b) delivery has occurred, c) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed as the price of the product is agreed to by the customer as a condition of the sales transaction which established the sales arrangement, and d) collectability is reasonably assured as evidenced by our collection of revenue through the monthly mortgage payments of our customers or through checking account debits to our customers’ accounts. Revenues from insurance contracts are recognized when earned.
For insurance products, we record revenue on a net basis as we perform as an agent or broker for the insurance products without assuming the risks of ownership of the insurance products.
We participate in agency relationships with insurance carriers that underwrite insurance products offered by us. Accordingly, insurance premiums collected from customers and remitted to insurance carriers are excluded from our revenues and operating expenses. Insurance premiums collected but not remitted to insurance carriers as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
totaled
$340 thousand
and
$360 thousand
, respectively, and are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
Other Membership Products and Transaction Services
For other membership products, we record revenue on a gross basis as we serve as the primary obligor in the transactions, have latitude in establishing price and bear credit risk for the amount billed to the subscriber.
Goodwill, Identifiable Intangibles and Other Long-Lived Assets
We record, as goodwill, the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired in purchase transactions. We review our goodwill for impairment annually, as of October 31, or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. Goodwill is reflected as an asset in our Personal Information Services and Insurance and Other Consumer Services segments’ balance sheets, resulting from our acquisitions of Health at Work Wellness Actuaries LLC ("Habits at Work") and White Sky, Inc. ("White Sky") in 2015 as well as our prior acquisition of IISI Insurance Services Inc. ("IISI"), formerly known as Intersections Insurance Services Inc., in 2006.
On January 1, 2017, we prospectively adopted ASU 2017-04, "
Intangibles-Goodwill and Other
." In evaluating whether indicators of impairment exist, an initial assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the goodwill impairment test can be utilized (commonly referred to as the step zero approach). For reporting units in which the qualitative assessment concludes it is more likely than not that the fair value is more than its carrying value, the guidance eliminates the requirement to perform further goodwill impairment testing. Upon adoption of ASU 2017-04, we are not required to perform a qualitative assessment for our reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units where a significant change or event occurs, and where potential impairment indicators exist, we perform the quantitative assessment to test goodwill for impairment. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include, among others (a) a significant decline in our expected future cash flows; (b) a sustained, significant decline in our stock price and market capitalization; (c) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate; (d) unanticipated competition; (e) the testing for recoverability of a significant asset group within a reporting unit; and (f) slower growth rates. Any adverse change in these factors could have a significant impact on the recoverability of these assets and could have a material impact in our consolidated financial statements.
The quantitative assessment is a comparison of each reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. We estimate fair value using the best information available, using a combined income approach (discounted cash flow) and market based approach. The income approach measures the value of the reporting units by the present values of its economic benefits. These benefits can include revenue and cost savings. The market based approach measures the value of an entity through an analysis of recent sales or offerings of comparable companies and using revenue and other multiples of comparable companies as a reasonable basis to estimate our implied multiples. Value indications are developed by discounting expected cash flows to their present value at a rate of return that incorporates the risk-free rate for use of funds, trends within the industry, and risks associated with particular investments of similar type and quality as of the valuation date. In addition, we consider the uncertainty of realizing the projected cash flows in the analysis.
The estimated fair values of our reporting units are dependent on several significant assumptions, including our earnings projections, and cost of capital (discount rate). The projections use management’s best estimates of economic and market conditions over the projected period including business plans, growth rates in sales, costs, and estimates of future expected changes in operating margins and cash expenditures. Other significant estimates and assumptions include terminal value growth rates, estimates of future capital expenditures, changes in future working capital requirements and overhead cost allocation, based on each reporting unit’s relative benefit received from the functions that reside in our Corporate business unit. We perform a detailed analysis of our Corporate overhead costs for purposes of establishing the overhead allocation baseline for the projection period. Overhead allocation methods include, but are not limited to, the percentage of the payroll within each reporting unit, allocation of existing support function costs based on estimated usage by the reporting units, and vendor specific costs incurred by Corporate that can be reasonably attributed to a particular reporting unit. These allocations are adjusted over the projected period in our discounted cash flow analysis based on the forecasted changing relative needs of the reporting units. Throughout the forecast period, the majority of Corporate’s total overhead expenses are allocated to our Personal Information Services reporting unit. We believe this overhead allocation method fairly allocates costs to each reporting unit, and we will continue to review, and possibly refine, these allocation methods as our businesses grow and mature. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and management’s judgment in applying each to the analysis of the recoverability of goodwill.
We estimate fair value giving consideration to both the income and market approaches. Consideration is given to the line of business and operating performance of the entities being valued relative to those of actual transactions, potentially subject to corresponding economic, environmental, and political factors considered to be reasonable investment alternatives.
If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, then a goodwill impairment loss is recognized for the amount that the carrying value of the reporting unit (including goodwill) exceeds its fair value, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
As of
December 31, 2017
, goodwill of
$347 thousand
resided in our Insurance and Other Consumer Services reporting unit and goodwill of
$9.4 million
resided in our Personal Information Services reporting unit. For additional information, please see Note
10
to our consolidated financial statements.
We review long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, property and equipment and other long-term assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the assets may not be fully recoverable. Significant judgments in this area involve determining whether a triggering event has occurred and determining the future cash flows for assets involved. In conducting our analysis, we would compare the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the long-lived assets to the related net book values. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the net book value, the long-lived assets are considered not to be impaired. If the net book value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, an impairment charge is measured and recognized. An impairment charge is measured as the difference between the net book value and the fair value of the long-lived assets. Fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows associated with these assets.
Intangible assets subject to amortization may include customer, marketing and technology related intangibles, as well as trademarks. Such intangible assets, excluding customer related intangibles, are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which are generally two to ten years. Customer related intangible assets are amortized on either a straight-line or accelerated basis, depending upon the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset are consumed or otherwise used up.
Debt Issuance Costs
Debt issuance costs are capitalized and amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the life of the related debt agreements. The effective interest rate applied to the amortization is reviewed periodically and may change if actual principal repayments of the term loan differ from estimates. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, short-term and long-term debt are presented net of the unamortized debt issuance costs in our consolidated balance sheets.
Classification of Debt
On April 20, 2017, we refinanced the Prior Credit Agreement with the New Credit Agreement. Pursuant to the New Credit Agreement, we are required to make certain prepayments on our term loans in addition to scheduled quarterly repayments, including but not limited to asset dispositions, extraordinary receipts, excess cash flows (as defined in the New Credit Agreement) and certain equity issuances. Scheduled quarterly repayments and estimated prepayments that we expect to remit in the next twelve months, if any, are classified as the current portion of long-term debt in our consolidated financial statements, net of unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discount to be amortized in the next twelve months based on the current effective interest rate applied.
Share Based Compensation
We currently issue equity and equity-based awards under the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), and we have three inactive stock incentive plans: the 1999 Stock Option Plan, the 2004 Stock Option Plan and the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. Individual awards under the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan may take the form of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and/or restricted stock units.
The Compensation Committee administers the Plan, and the grants are approved by either the Compensation Committee or by appropriate members of Management in accordance with authority delegated by the Compensation Committee. Restricted stock units in the Plan that have expired, terminated, or been canceled or forfeited are available for issuance or use in connection with future awards.
We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value all options and the straight-line method to amortize this fair value as compensation cost over the requisite service period. The fair value of each option granted has been estimated as of the date of grant with the following weighted-average assumptions for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
.
Expected Dividend Yield.
Under the New Credit Agreement, we are currently prohibited from declaring and paying dividends and therefore, the dividend yield was
zero
for
2017
and
2016
.
Expected Volatility.
The expected volatility of options granted was estimated based upon our historical share price volatility based on the expected term of the underlying grants, or approximately
50%
and
45%
for
2017
and
2016
, respectively.
Risk-free Interest Rate.
The yield on actively traded non-inflation indexed U.S. Treasury notes was used to extrapolate an average risk-free interest rate based on the expected term of the underlying grants, or approximately
1.8%
and
1.1%
for
2017
and
2016
, respectively.
Expected Term.
The expected term of options granted was determined by considering employees’ historical exercise patterns, of approximately
4.6
and
4.8 years
for
2017
and
2016
, respectively. We will continue to review our estimate in the future and adjust it, if necessary, due to changes in our historical exercises.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, we granted performance-based restricted stock units ("PBRSUs"). In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we assess the probability that the performance conditions of the PBRSUs would be achieved and recorded share based compensation expense based on the probable outcome of that performance condition. Vesting of the PBRSUs was dependent upon continued employment and achievement of defined performance goals for the year, which were based upon Adjusted EBIDTA, as defined and determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. We recognized the shared based compensation expense ratably over the implied service period. The 2016 PBRSU grant vested by March 15, 2017 and we adjusted the shared based compensation expense throughout the vesting period based on our assessment of probability. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we did not grant any PBRSUs.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the applicable provisions of U.S. GAAP, which requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including projected future taxable income and future reversal of existing deferred tax assets and liabilities, sufficient sources of taxable income in available carryback periods, tax-planning strategies, and historical results of recent operations. The assumptions about future taxable income require significant judgment and are consistent with the plans and estimates we are using to manage the underlying businesses. In evaluating the objective evidence that historical results provide, we consider three trailing years of cumulative operating income (loss). Valuation allowances are provided, if, based upon the weight of the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Changes in tax laws and rates may affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities and our effective tax rate in the future.
We believe that our tax positions comply with applicable tax law. As a matter of course, we may be audited by various taxing authorities and these audits may result in proposed assessments where the ultimate resolution may result in us owing additional taxes. U.S. GAAP addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. We may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than
fifty percent
likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We have elected to include principal and penalties expense related to uncertain tax positions as part of income tax expense and include interest expense related to uncertain tax positions as part of interest expense in the consolidated financial statements. The accrued interest is included as a component of other long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. U.S. GAAP provides guidance on how an enterprise should determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits.
Our income tax expense and liability and/or receivable, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and liabilities for uncertain tax benefits reflect management’s best assessment of estimated current and future taxes to be paid or received. Significant judgments and estimates are required in determining the consolidated income tax expense.
Contingent Liabilities
The Company may become involved in litigation or other financial claims as a result of our normal business operations. We periodically analyze currently available information and make a determination of the probability of loss and provide a range of possible loss when we believe that sufficient and appropriate information is available. We accrue a liability for those contingencies where the incurrence of a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If a loss is probable and a range of amounts can be reasonably estimated but no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount in the range, then the minimum of the range is accrued. We do not accrue a liability when the likelihood that the liability has been incurred is believed to be probable but the amount cannot be reasonably estimated or when the likelihood that a liability has been incurred is believed to be only reasonably possible or remote. For contingencies where an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible and the impact could potentially be material, we disclose the nature of the contingency and, where feasible, an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss.
Variable Interest Entities
Our decision to consolidate an entity is based on our assessment that we have a controlling financial interest in such entity. We continuously evaluate our related party relationships and any ownership interests, including controlling or financial interests of our executive management team such as our Executive Chairman and President's non-controlling interest in One Health Group, LLC ("OHG"). In accordance with U.S. GAAP, since the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient for OHG to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, as well as economic interests of the holders of OHG that are disproportionate to their voting interests, we concluded OHG is a variable interest entity ("VIE"). We further analyzed which related party would be the primary beneficiary in a tiebreaker test. Given that neither we nor our de facto agent have the power to direct the activities of OHG that most significantly impact its economic performance, we determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the VIE and therefore are not required to consolidate the results of OHG. We do not have any assets or liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet that relate to our variable interest in OHG. Other than the potential participation in future revenue if and when earned, we have no material, continuing economic or other involvement in OHG, including no exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with OHG. Please see Note
4
for additional information related to the divestiture.
Internally Developed Capitalized Software
We develop software for our internal use and capitalize the estimated software development costs incurred during the application development stage in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Costs incurred prior to and after the application development stage are charged to expense. When the software is ready for its intended use, capitalization ceases and such costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated life, which is generally
three years
. We regularly review our capitalized software projects for impairment.
Accounting Standards Updates Recently Adopted and Not Yet Effective
See Note
3
to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information about accounting standards updates recently adopted and not yet effective.
Results of Continuing Operations
Years Ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
(in thousands):
The consolidated results of continuing operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Change
|
|
2017
|
|
Percent of Revenue
|
|
2016
|
|
Percent of Revenue
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Percent
|
Revenue
|
$
|
159,620
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
175,592
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(15,972
|
)
|
|
(9.1
|
)%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
|
11,330
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
13,156
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
(1,826
|
)
|
|
(13.9
|
)%
|
Commission
|
38,386
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
42,775
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
|
(4,389
|
)
|
|
(10.3
|
)%
|
Cost of revenue
|
51,710
|
|
|
32.4
|
%
|
|
53,797
|
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
|
(2,087
|
)
|
|
(3.9
|
)%
|
General and administrative
|
62,530
|
|
|
39.2
|
%
|
|
59,671
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
2,859
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Loss on dispositions of Captira and Habits at Work
|
106
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
106
|
|
|
N/M*
|
|
Impairment of intangibles and other assets
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
(1,428
|
)
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
Depreciation
|
5,485
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
4,763
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
722
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
Amortization
|
152
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
513
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
(70.4
|
)%
|
Total operating expenses
|
169,699
|
|
|
106.3
|
%
|
|
176,103
|
|
|
100.3
|
%
|
|
(6,404
|
)
|
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
Loss from operations
|
(10,079
|
)
|
|
(6.3
|
)%
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
(9,568
|
)
|
|
1,872.4
|
%
|
Interest expense, net
|
(2,227
|
)
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
(2,366
|
)
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
139
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
(1,525
|
)
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
(1,525
|
)
|
|
N/M*
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
126
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
(487
|
)
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
613
|
|
|
(125.9
|
)%
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
(13,705
|
)
|
|
(8.6
|
)%
|
|
(3,364
|
)
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
(10,341
|
)
|
|
307.4
|
%
|
Income tax benefit (expense) from continuing operations
|
1,915
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
1,990
|
|
|
(2,653.3
|
)%
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
(11,790
|
)
|
|
(7.4
|
)%
|
|
(3,439
|
)
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
(8,351
|
)
|
|
242.8
|
%
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
(2,534
|
)
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
(27,030
|
)
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
|
24,496
|
|
|
(90.6
|
)%
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(14,324
|
)
|
|
(9.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(30,469
|
)
|
|
(17.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
16,145
|
|
|
(53.0
|
)%
|
* Not meaningful.
Revenue and Subscribers
The following tables provide details of our revenue information for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
(percent of total)
|
Bank of America
|
$
|
68,027
|
|
|
$
|
77,841
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
All other financial institution clients
|
16,037
|
|
|
18,361
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
Subtotal: financial institutions
|
84,064
|
|
|
96,202
|
|
|
52.6
|
%
|
|
54.8
|
%
|
Identity Guard
®
(1)
|
50,507
|
|
|
50,571
|
|
|
31.6
|
%
|
|
28.8
|
%
|
Canadian business lines
|
13,096
|
|
|
12,488
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
Breach services & other (1)
|
5,484
|
|
|
4,441
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
Subtotal: ongoing business lines
|
69,087
|
|
|
67,500
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
|
38.4
|
%
|
Total Personal Information Services revenue
|
153,151
|
|
|
163,702
|
|
|
95.9
|
%
|
|
93.2
|
%
|
Revenue from other segments
|
6,469
|
|
|
11,890
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
Consolidated revenue
|
$
|
159,620
|
|
|
$
|
175,592
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
The following tables provide details of our subscriber information for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Institution
|
|
Identity Guard
®
(1)
|
|
Canadian Business Lines
|
|
Total
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
818
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
1,331
|
|
Additions
|
2
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
257
|
|
Cancellations
|
(115
|
)
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
(404
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
705
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
Additions
|
2
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
268
|
|
Cancellations
|
(87
|
)
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
(312
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
620
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
____________________
|
|
(1)
|
We periodically refine the criteria used to calculate and report our subscriber data. In the year ended December 31, 2017, we determined that certain subscribers who receive our breach response services should no longer be included in the presentation of Identity Guard
®
subscribers or revenue due to the nonrecurring nature of our breach response services. For comparability, all periods presented have been recast to reflect this change in subscribers and revenue.
|
Personal Information Services Revenue
Revenue from our actively marketed, ongoing business lines, Identity Guard
®
, Canada, and Breach services and other, increased
$1.6 million
, or
2.4%
, for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The Identity Guard
®
business line revenue for 2017 was consistent with the prior year as revenue gains from subscriber increases in several of our Identity Guard
®
partner and programs were offset by decreases in revenue from subscribers acquired through one of our partners, Costco, that is no longer marketing our products. The Identity Guard
®
subscriber base increased approximately
13%
as a result of new subscribers acquired in the later part of 2017 through one of our employee benefit partners. In mid-2017, we reduced marketing spending in certain direct-to-consumer channels and expect to continue a reduced level of spending through 2018, which may result in reduced subscriber additions in those channels. We continue to focus on improving and expanding our affiliate marketing programs, partner relationships, and employer programs, which, if successful, could increase our revenue and subscriber counts over the next twelve months.
Revenue from our Canadian business line increased
4.8%
in 2017 as our Canadian joint marketing partner operated for the full year of 2017 after transitioning form the prior partner in 2016. Our marketing partner has previous experience in the identity theft monitoring business and has existing relationships with Canadian businesses. This partner was successful in expanding its partners in 2017 and achieving a higher average revenue per subscriber, which was partially offset by normal subscriber attrition. We expect continued success in growing our Canadian market share in 2018.
The increase in revenue from our Breach services and other business lines of
$1.0 million
was primarily the result of the full year revenue from a client breach services program that was initiated in late 2016.
The revenue increase in the on-going business lines was more than offset by a
$12.1 million
decline in revenue from our Bank of America and other financial institution clients, which is primarily the result of normal subscriber attrition within the portfolios we continue to service. Due to our ceased marketing and retention efforts, we expect revenue and related earnings from our financial institution client base to continue to decrease.
Revenue From Other Segments
The decrease in revenue continues to be partially due to subscriber attrition and portfolio cancellations in our Insurance and Other Consumer Services segment, which consists of purchasers of both insurance and membership services that have recurring subscription benefits, and minimal new subscription sales due to substantially ceased marketing efforts by most of our clients for these products. We had approximately
39 thousand
subscribers in our Insurance and Other Consumer Services segment as of
December 31, 2017
, which is a
23.5%
decrease from our subscriber base of
51 thousand
subscribers as of
December 31, 2016
.
The decrease in consolidated revenue is also due to the disposal of our Bail Bonds Industry Solutions segment in January 2017. This segment's operating results are not classified as a discontinued operation, and therefore the revenue related to this segment remains in the results of continuing operations for 2016. The effect is a decrease in consolidated revenue of
$1.9 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2017
compared to the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
Marketing Expenses
Marketing expenses consisted of subscriber acquisition costs, including affiliate marketing payments, search engine marketing, web-based marketing and direct mail expenses such as printing and postage. In the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, our marketing expenses resulted primarily from marketing activity for direct-to-consumer and Canadian subscriber acquisitions, which decreased in the year ended
December 31, 2017
compared to the year ended
December 31, 2016
. Amortization of deferred subscription solicitation costs related to marketing of our products for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
was
$9.6 million
and
$11.7 million
, respectively. Marketing costs that do not meet the criteria for capitalization and are expensed as incurred for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
were
$1.8 million
and
$1.5 million
, respectively. We continue to expect our limited direct-to-consumer marketing spend to focus on our historically most productive channels or programs, which may result in less marketing costs, reduced subscriber acquisitions and revenue.
Upon adoption of ASU 2014-09, "
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
," on January 1, 2018, we will no longer defer and amortize direct-response advertising costs
, and as such, we expect our marketing expenses in 2018 to be significantly lower than in prior years. For additional information, please see Note
3
to our consolidated financial statements.
Commission Expenses
Commission expenses consist of commissions paid to our clients and other partners. The decrease is related to a decrease in overall subscribers for which commissions are paid, which is largely from our financial institution subscriber base. We expect commission expenses related to our financial institution subscriber base to continue to decline due to normal attrition of subscribers in client portfolios with no new marketing activity. However, the decline may be partially or completely offset by increased commission expenses related to increased sales of our new product offerings. We expect commission expenses as a percentage of revenue to remain flat in 2018.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue consists of the costs of operating our customer service and information processing centers, data costs, and billing costs for subscribers and one-time transactional sales. The decrease is primarily due to lower volumes of data fulfillment and service costs for subscribers, partially offset by an additional expense for non-income business taxes of
$1.3 million
(or
0.8%
of revenue), which is the result of both an assessment received in a state audit and contingent liabilities in other applicable state jurisdictions. We incur fixed fee long term pricing for the supply of credit bureau data and certain alternative data sources for our products, which is expected to reduce our effective rates (or alternatively, the variable rate of tiered and fixed subscriber fulfillment costs) as volume increases. For additional information, please see "Liquidity and Capital Resources—Other" below.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist of personnel and facilities expenses associated with our executive, sales, marketing, information technology, legal, human resources and finance functions, as well as internal audit, payroll, share based compensation and other corporate overhead costs. We incurred additional general and administrative expenses in 2017 as we significantly invested in our sales and business development departments, as the pipeline of engagement leads have grown and we continue to seek to convert the market opportunities into sustainable revenue for 2018 and beyond. We expect this increased investment to be partially offset by the forecasted future reduction of payroll expenses in other departments, which increased severance expense by $1.4 million in 2017 compared to 2016. General and administrative expenses were favorably impacted in 2017 by a one-time, non-cash benefit resulting from a change in our vacation policy (see Note
12
to our consolidated financial statements) as well as decreased professional fees, the majority of which were incurred in 2016 for the development of Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
, which was launched in late 2016.
In addition, our total share based compensation expense increased to
$8.5 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2017
from
$4.7 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
, primarily due to grants of 2.1 million stock options and 2.6 million RSUs to employees in 2017.
Depreciation
Depreciation consists primarily of depreciation of our fixed assets and capitalized software. The increase is primarily due to internally developed capitalized software related to the continuous innovative development of Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
, the majority of which was placed into service in late 2016.
Goodwill
Both our Personal Information Services and Insurance and Other Consumer Services reporting units had negative carrying amounts of net assets, and therefore we did not perform an annual test of our goodwill for impairment. In addition, we did not identify any triggering events in the year ended
December 31, 2017
. To the extent our Personal Information Services or Insurance and Other Consumer Services reporting units realize unfavorable actual results compared to forecasted results, or decrease forecasted results compared to previous forecasts, or in the event the estimated fair value of the reporting units decrease, we may incur additional impairment charges in the future.
Interest Expense
The decrease in 2017 compared to 2016 is primarily due to a lower interest rate on our outstanding debt under the New Credit Agreement as compared to the Prior Credit Agreement, partially offset by increased interest expense on the underpayment of non-income business taxes. For additional information, please see "—Other" in Note
16
to our consolidated financial statements.
As a result of the outstanding debt under the New Credit Agreement, we expect to continue to incur significant interest expense until maturity. For additional information, please see Note
15
to our consolidated financial statements.
Other Income (Expense), net
Other income was
$126 thousand
for the year ended
December 31, 2017
compared to other (expense) of
$(487) thousand
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
. The increase in other income is primarily due to the reversal of an unrealized foreign currency exchange gain related to the resolution of a non-income tax audit in 2016.
Income Taxes
Our consolidated effective tax rate from continuing operations for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
was
14.0%
and
(2.2)%
, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to estimated impacts of the broad and complex changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Act”),
which was enacted in 2017 and resulted in the reduction of the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets, which will become indefinite-lived under the future net operating loss carryforward rules, and the repeal of the corporate alternative minimum tax.
We continued to evaluate all significant positive and negative evidence including, but not limited to, our three-year cumulative loss, as adjusted for permanent items; insufficient sources of taxable income in prior carryback periods in order to utilize all of the existing definite-lived net deferred tax assets; unavailability of prudent and feasible tax-planning strategies; negative adjustments to our projected taxable income; and scheduling of the future reversals of existing temporary differences.
The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable as of
December 31, 2017
could be adjusted if facts and circumstances in future reporting periods change, including, but not limited to, generating sufficient future taxable income in the carryforward periods. If certain substantial changes in the entity’s ownership were to occur, there could be an annual limitation on the amount of the carryforwards that can be utilized in the future.
There were no material changes to our uncertain tax positions during the years ended
December 31, 2017
or
2016
. We believe it is reasonably possible we could reduce our unrecognized tax benefits by up to
$1.2 million
within the next twelve months, primarily related to the settlement of general business credits refunded under audit, which would also reduce the income tax receivable and the income tax provision in our consolidated financial statements.
Discontinued Operations
Prior to July 31, 2017, our Pet Health Monitoring segment included the health and wellness monitoring products and services for veterinarians and pet owners through our former subsidiary, i4c. Effective July 31, 2017, we divested our ownership in i4c. This segment is classified as a discontinued operation in the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
. For additional information, please see Note
4
to our consolidated financial statements.
The Purchaser is a newly-formed entity of which Michael R. Stanfield, our Executive Chairman and President, is a minority investor, and certain former members of the i4c management team are the managing member and investors. Except as described in Note
4
to our consolidated financial statements, there are no material relationships between the Purchaser, on the one hand, and us or any of our affiliates, directors, officers, or any associate of such directors or officers, on the other hand. For our policy on identifying a controlling financial interest, please see "—Variable Interest Entities" in Note
2
to our consolidated financial statements
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash and cash equivalents were
$8.5 million
as of
December 31, 2017
compared to
$10.8 million
as of
December 31, 2016
. Our cash and cash equivalents are highly liquid investments and may include short-term U.S. Treasury securities with original maturity dates of less than or equal to 90 days.
Our accounts receivable balance as of
December 31, 2017
was
$8.2 million
compared to
$9.4 million
as of
December 31, 2016
. The likelihood of non-payment has historically been remote with respect to our Identity Guard
®
, financial institution and insurance services clients billed, however, we do provide for an allowance for doubtful accounts with respect to breach response services. In addition, we provide for a refund allowance, which is included in liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets, against transactions that may be refunded in subsequent months. This allowance is based on historical results.
We had a working capital surplus of
$2.3 million
as of
December 31, 2017
compared to
$786 thousand
as of
December 31, 2016
. The increase is primarily due to the execution of an amendment to our New Credit Agreement, which increased our term loan by $1.5 million. Our short-term and long-term liquidity depends primarily upon our level of income from operations, cash balances and working capital management. Pursuant to the New Credit Agreement (as described below), we are required to maintain at all times minimum cash on hand amount of the lesser of
20%
or certain stated amounts of the total amount outstanding under the term loan, as set forth in the New Credit Agreement.
We believe that the cash and cash equivalents on hand and anticipated cash provided by operations will be sufficient to fund our anticipated working capital requirements of our business segments for the next twelve months. We expect to continue to fund sales, marketing, business development, and product development activities from anticipated cash provided by operations. The initiative to limit cash spend for certain historically productive direct-to-consumer marketing that began in the second quarter of 2017 is expected to continue indefinitely and continue to have a positive impact on our cash flows provided by operations. We also expect our Identity Guard
®
and Canadian subscriber bases and related revenues to increase as a result of new client relationships as well as the expansion of existing client relationships. If there is a material change in our anticipated cash provided by operations or working capital needs, as a result of not achieving these objectives or for other reasons, at a time when we are not in compliance with all of the covenants in the New Credit Agreement or otherwise do not have access to other sources of capital, our liquidity could be negatively affected.
We may explore additional or replacement financing sources, including to fund expansion, to respond to competitive pressures, to invest in or acquire complementary products, businesses or technologies, or to lower our cost of capital, which could include equity and debt financings. There can be no guarantee that any additional or replacement financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. If additional or replacement capital is raised through the issuance of equity or equity-like securities, existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and if we raise additional or replacement capital through the issuance of debt securities or other borrowings, these securities or borrowings could have rights senior to common stock, could result in increased interest expense and other costs, and could contain additional covenants that could restrict operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Difference
|
|
(in thousands)
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows (used in) provided by continuing operations
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,262
|
|
|
$
|
(13,312
|
)
|
Cash flows used in discontinued operations
|
(2,398
|
)
|
|
(17,183
|
)
|
|
14,785
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(2,448
|
)
|
|
(3,921
|
)
|
|
1,473
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in continuing operations
|
(6,387
|
)
|
|
(5,578
|
)
|
|
(809
|
)
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) discontinued operations
|
4
|
|
|
(1,031
|
)
|
|
1,035
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(6,383
|
)
|
|
(6,609
|
)
|
|
226
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
6,155
|
|
|
10,237
|
|
|
(4,082
|
)
|
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
(2,676
|
)
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
(2,383
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — Beginning of period
|
10,797
|
|
|
11,471
|
|
|
(674
|
)
|
Cash reclassified to assets held for sale at beginning of period
|
381
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
381
|
|
Less: cash reclassified to assets held for sale at end of period
|
—
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
|
381
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — End of period
|
$
|
8,502
|
|
|
$
|
10,797
|
|
|
$
|
(2,295
|
)
|
The decrease in operating cash flows from continuing operations is primarily due to decreases in revenue from reduced subscribers from the comparable period. In addition, costs in our business development and sales departments increased compared to the prior year period, and we expect to incur similar costs in these departments in 2018 as we continue our efforts to support our growth initiatives in various marketing channels. We divested our non-core businesses in 2017, which partially offset the decrease in our cash flows from continuing operations and will have a positive impact on our future operating cash flows.
In 2017, we paid executive management bonuses of $1.0 million, which were approved by the Compensation Committee. Additionally, we recorded a $1.5 million liability primarily related to an audit by a state for non-income business taxes, for which we remitted $827 thousand in 2017. We continue to correspond with the applicable authorities in an effort toward resolution of our potential remaining indirect tax obligations in 2018. For additional information, please see "—Other" below. Payment of these liabilities have and may continue to decrease our cash from operations for the next twelve months. Subsequent to December 31, 2017, we effectively settled a portion of our refund claim, which was under federal income tax audit, and we expect to receive approximately $1.3 million in the first half of 2018. We continue our efforts to resolve the remaining federal income tax refund claims, which, if successful, would also increase our cash flows from operations.
The decrease in investing cash flows from continuing operations is primarily due to payments related to the sale of Captira (see Note
4
to our consolidated financial statements), as well as an increase in acquisition costs of property and equipment. We continue to fund the acquisition of property and equipment, which includes the internally developed capitalized software, as we add innovative new services and tools to our Identity Guard
®
portfolio.
The decrease in cash flows from financing activities is due to proceeds of $20.0 million from the closing of the Prior Credit Agreement in the first quarter of 2016, partially offset by net proceeds received from the closing of the New Credit Agreement and Warrant in 2017, described below. We anticipate making a voluntary principal payment on our term loan facility of approximately $1.0 million in early 2018, which may be subject to a mutual agreement with our lender and may include, but may not be limited to, an amendment to the minimum cash on hand covenant requirement.
Credit Facility and Borrowing Capacity
Debt
In March 2016, we and our subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement with Crystal Financial SPV LLC ("Prior Credit Agreement"). The Prior Credit Agreement provided for a $20.0 million senior secured term loan, which was fully funded at closing, with a maturity date of March 21, 2019 and interest at the greater of LIBOR plus 10% per annum or 10.5% per annum. As of
December 31, 2016, $13.4 million was outstanding, which was presented net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $1.2 million in our consolidated balance sheets in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
In April 2017, we refinanced our indebtedness under the Prior Credit Agreement with a new term loan facility with PEAK6 Investments. We also executed amendments to the new term loan facility in July and November 2017 (together with the amendments, the "New Credit Agreement"), which had a principal outstanding amount of $21.5 million as of
December 31, 2017
and an initial interest rate of
9.99%
per annum, to be adjusted annually on March 31 to
8.25%
plus 1 year LIBOR. The maturity date of the New Credit Agreement is April 20, 2021 with quarterly principal payments of
$1.3 million
commencing on September 30, 2019. The New Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all our assets and a pledge by us of stock and membership interests we hold in any domestic and first-tier foreign subsidiaries.
We used approximately
$13.9 million
of the net proceeds from the New Credit Agreement to repay in full the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Prior Credit Agreement and to pay interest, prepayment penalties, transaction fees and expenses as a result of the termination. We are using the remainder of the proceeds from the New Credit Agreement for general corporate purposes, including to increase subscriber acquisitions and continue our innovative product development. As a result of the refinancing, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1.5 million in the year ended
December 31, 2017
, including interest, prepayment penalties, transaction fees and expenses totaling approximately
$487 thousand
as a result of the termination of the Prior Credit Agreement.
The New Credit Agreement requires the prepayment of the aggregate principal amount outstanding in an amount equal to
25%
of our excess cash flow (as defined in the New Credit Agreement) for each fiscal year commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 and continuing thereafter. Certain other events defined in the New Credit Agreement require prepayment of the aggregate principal amount of the term loan, including all or a portion of proceeds received from asset dispositions (except for proceeds from the sale of assets in our i4c subsidiary), casualty events, extraordinary receipts, and certain equity issuances. Once amounts borrowed have been paid or prepaid, they may not be reborrowed.
As of
December 31, 2017
,
$21.5 million
was outstanding under the New Credit Agreement, which is presented net of unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discount totaling
$764 thousand
in our consolidated balance sheets in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As of
December 31, 2017
,
none
of the outstanding balance is classified as short-term.
The New Credit Agreement contains certain customary covenants, including among other things covenants that limit or restrict the following: the incurrence of liens; the making of investments including a prohibition of any capital contributions to our subsidiary i4c other than to complete the wind-down as noted above and fair and reasonable allocation of overhead and administrative expenses; the incurrence of certain indebtedness; mergers, dissolutions, liquidations, or consolidations; acquisitions (other than certain permitted acquisitions); sales of substantially all of our or any of our subsidiaries' assets, except for the orderly wind down of the Pet Health Monitoring, and the exits of our Bail Bonds Industry Solutions and Habits at Work businesses; the declaration of certain dividends or distributions; transactions with affiliates (other than parties to the New Credit Agreement) other than on fair and reasonable terms; and the formation or acquisition of any direct or indirect domestic or first-tier foreign subsidiary unless such subsidiary becomes a guarantor and enters into certain security documents.
The New Credit Agreement requires us to maintain at all times a minimum cash on hand amount of the lesser of 20% or certain stated amounts of the total amount outstanding under the term loan, as set forth in the New Credit Agreement. We are also required to maintain compliance on a quarterly basis commencing with the quarter ending December 31, 2017 with minimum consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the New Credit Agreement and adjusted for certain non-cash, non-recurring and other items, and up to $4.3 million of non-recurring charges incurred in the wind-down events) of $2.0 million; provided consolidated EBITDA from the immediately preceding quarter in excess of $2.0 million may be added to a current quarter to make up any shortfall and provided further that when we have not met the minimum consolidated EBITDA test for any quarter (even after including excess consolidated EBITDA for the prior quarter) the test for compliance is deferred until the end of the next quarter and we shall be deemed to be in compliance if, taking into account consolidated EBITDA in excess of $2.0 million from the prior quarter, consolidated EBITDA from the test quarter, and consolidated EBITDA in excess of $2.0 million from the subsequent quarter, we pass the minimum compliance test. Excess consolidated EBITDA in any quarter can be counted only once for determining compliance with this covenant. As of December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all such covenants.
Minimum Consolidated EBITDA
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarters Ending
|
|
Amount
|
Fiscal quarter ending on December 31, 2017
|
|
$1,500,000
|
Each fiscal quarter ending on or after March 31, 2018 but on or before December 31, 2018
|
|
$1,000,000
|
Fiscal quarter ending on March 31, 2019
|
|
$1,500,000
|
Each fiscal quarter ending on or after June 30, 2019
|
|
$2,000,000
|
The New Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default, including among other things non-payment defaults, covenant defaults, inaccuracy of representations and warranties, bankruptcy and insolvency defaults, material judgment defaults, ERISA defaults, cross-defaults to other indebtedness, invalidity of loan documents defaults, change in control defaults, conduct of business defaults, and criminal and regulatory action defaults.
Failure to comply with any of the covenants under the New Credit Agreement could result in a default under the facility, which could cause the lender to declare all obligations immediately due and payable and exercise their lien on substantially all of our assets. Although we have historically received waivers and executed amendments when necessary, there can be no assurances that we would be able to obtain a waiver or amendment in the future.
Warrant
In connection with the New Credit Agreement, PEAK6 Investments purchased, for an aggregate purchase price of
$1.5 million
in cash, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of
1.5 million
shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$5.00
per share ("Original Warrant”). In connection with a later amendment to the New Credit Agreement, we issued a warrant to PEAK6 Investments for an additional purchase price of $700 thousand in cash ("Replacement Warrant"), and PEAK6 Investments surrendered the Original Warrant previously issued by us on April 20, 2017. The Replacement Warrant provides PEAK6 with the right to purchase an aggregate of 1.5 million shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share. The Replacement Warrant is immediately exercisable, has a five-year term and shall be exercised solely by a “net share settlement” feature that requires the holder to exercise the Replacement Warrant without a cash payment upon the terms set forth therein. The Warrant includes a feature to provide for increases in the number of shares issuable upon exercise in the event of a future change of control transaction (as defined therein), with the number of increased shares based upon the time elapsed from issuance of the Warrant and the difference between the exercise price of the Warrant and the transaction price in the change of control, all as more fully set forth in the Warrant. The Warrant also provides for adjustments in the underlying number of shares and exercise price in the event of recapitalizations, stock splits or dividends and other corporate events. Warrants are valued on our balance sheet at $2.8 million as of December 31, 2017. For additional information related to the fair value of the warrants, please see Note
6
to our consolidated financial statements.
Stock Redemption
In connection with the New Credit Agreement, we used the proceeds from the sale of the Original Warrant to repurchase approximately
419 thousand
shares of our common stock, pursuant to a redemption agreement from PEAK6 Capital Management LLC at a price of
$3.60
per share, for an aggregate repurchase price of approximately
$1.5 million
. PEAK6 Capital Management LLC is an affiliate of PEAK6 Investments.
The repurchase was made pursuant to our previously announced share repurchase program. The repurchases may be made on the open market, in block trades, through privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, and the program may be suspended or discontinued at any time. However, we are currently prohibited from repurchasing any shares of common stock under the New Credit Agreement.
Share Repurchase
As of
December 31, 2017
, we had approximately $15.3 million remaining under our share repurchase program. During the year ended
December 31, 2017
, we repurchased 419 thousand shares of our common stock as described above. During the year ended
December 31, 2016
, we did not directly repurchase any shares of common stock for cash. As a result of shares withheld for tax purposes on the vesting of a restricted stock award, we increased our treasury shares by
103 thousand
and
76 thousand
in the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively.
Other
In April 2017, our Board of Directors approved a second amendment to the 2014 Plan to increase the number of shares authorized and reserved for issuance thereunder by 4.0 million shares, from 5.5 million shares to 9.5 million shares. The amendment was effective immediately upon our stockholders' approval in May 2017.
We periodically analyze our facts and circumstances related to potential obligations in state jurisdictions, including the delivery nature of our services, the relationship through which our services are offered, and changing state laws and interpretations of those laws, and have determined we may have indirect tax obligations in state and other jurisdictions.
The following table summarizes the non-income business tax liability activity during the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
3,427
|
|
Adjustments to existing liabilities
|
1,516
|
|
|
(2,110
|
)
|
Payments
|
(827
|
)
|
|
(1,223
|
)
|
Balance, end of year
|
$
|
783
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
We continue to analyze what obligations we have, if any, to state taxing authorities. As a result of an audit by a state for non-income business taxes, for which an assessment was received in the year ended
December 31, 2017
, we recorded a liability of
$936 thousand
in the same period for the underpayment of taxes and related interest, which was recorded primarily in cost of revenue in our consolidated statements of operations. Additionally, we recorded an estimated liability of
$580 thousand
for the potential underpayment in other jurisdictions. We analyzed all the information available to us in order to estimate a liability for potential obligations in other jurisdictions including, but not limited to: the delivery nature of our services; the relationship through which our services are offered; the probability of obtaining resale or exemption certificates; limited, if any, nexus-creating activity; and our historical success in settling or abating liabilities under audit. We continue to correspond with the applicable authorities in an effort toward resolution of our potential liabilities using a variety of settlement options including, but not limited to, voluntary disclosures, negotiation and standard appeals process, and we may adjust the liability as a result of such correspondence. Proceedings with jurisdictions are inherently unpredictable, but we believe it is reasonably possible that other states may approach us or that the scope of the taxable base in any state may also increase.
We have entered into various software licenses and operational commitments totaling approximately
$70.6 million
as of
December 31, 2017
,
payable in monthly and yearly installments through December 31, 2021.
These amounts will be expensed on a pro-rata basis and recorded in cost of services revenue and general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of
December 31, 2017
, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements other than the revenue participation rights as discussed in "—Recent Developments — Divestiture of Voyce" above.
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide this information.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The information required by this item is set forth beginning on
page F-1
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
On April 1, 2016, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors dismissed our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP ("Deloitte"), effective as of that same date.
Deloitte's audit reports on our financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During our fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the subsequent interim period through April 1, 2016, (i) there were no disagreements with Deloitte on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to Deloitte's satisfaction, would have caused Deloitte to make reference to the subject matter in connection with their reports on our financial statements for such years; and (ii) there were no reportable events, within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
On and effective as of April 1, 2016, we selected RSM US LLP ("RSM") as our independent registered public accounting firm. During our fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the subsequent interim period through April 1, 2016, neither we, nor any party on our behalf, consulted RSM with respect to (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of the audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to us that RSM concluded was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue, or (ii) any matter that was subject to any disagreement, as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions thereto, or a reportable event within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its “disclosure controls and procedures” (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “34 Act”)) as of the end of the period
covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the 34 Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to give reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the 34 Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Our officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective as of December 31, 2017 as a result of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as described below in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the 34 Act). Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation of reliable financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Internal control over financial reporting includes self-monitoring mechanisms and actions taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified. Because of the inherent limitations in any internal control, no matter how well designed, misstatements may occur and not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, even effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, the evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting was made as of a specific date, and continued effectiveness in future periods is subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may decline.
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 based on the framework set forth in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and effective as of December 15, 2014. Based on the evaluation performed, management concluded that material weaknesses existed as of December 31, 2017 in our controls over accounting for share based compensation and revenue recognition, as described below.
The first material weakness in internal control over financial reporting resulted from the lack of controls which allowed for the misapplication of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718,
Share Based Compensation
("ASC 718"). Specifically, we did not have adequate controls in place to properly identify and account for a retirement age-specific provision in our stock incentive plan, employment agreements and option award agreements that were subject to acceleration of the requisite service period requirement in accordance with the accounting guidance.
The second material weakness in internal control over financial reporting resulted from the lack of controls which allowed for the misapplication of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605,
Revenue Recognition
. Specifically, we did not have adequate controls in place to properly recognize revenue from the sale of subscriptions on a straight-line basis over the 30-day membership period and ratably recognize the corresponding commission expense.
To remediate the material weaknesses described above, we have initiated compensating controls in the near term and are enhancing and revising the design of existing controls and procedures to properly apply accounting for share based compensation under ASC 718 and revenue recognition under ASC 606,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
, which we adopted as of January 1, 2018. The material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. We expect that the remediation of these material weaknesses will be completed prior to the end of 2018.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Pursuant to Item 308(b) of Regulation S-K, management’s report is not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm because the Company is neither an “accelerated filer” nor a “large accelerated filer” as those terms are defined by the SEC.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Except as noted above, there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
December 31, 2017
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
Please refer to the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of this Report for information about our new credit facility.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
1
. Organization and Business
We provide innovative software and data monitoring and analytics solutions that help consumers manage financial and personal risks associated with the proliferation of their personal data in the virtual and financial world. Under our Identity Guard
®
brand and other brands that comprise our Personal Information Services segment, we have helped consumers monitor, manage and protect against the risks associated with their identities and personal information for more than twenty years. We offer identity theft and privacy protection as well as credit monitoring services for consumers to understand, monitor, manage and protect their personal information and privacy. Under our Identity Guard
®
and Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
products, we help protect consumers against the risks associated with the inappropriate exposure of their personal information that can result in fraudulent use or reputation damage. Identity Guard
®
is offered through large and small organizations as an embedded product for either its employees or consumers, as well as directly to consumers through our direct marketing efforts. In 2017, we expanded our suite of Identity Guard
®
and Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
products. Identity Guard
®
with Watson
™
offers robust early detection of potential risks, stretching beyond credit-centric risks to include online privacy risks, and provides personalized threat alerts with actionable steps to help keep our customers’ information private from the earliest stage possible. We believe that our suite of products and services offer consumers the most proactive and comprehensive identity theft monitoring and online privacy services available on the market today.
We have ongoing operations in one other segment, Insurance and Other Consumer Services. As part of our strategy to have a singular focus on our Personal Information Services segment, we recently sold: 1) the business comprising our Bail Bonds Industry Solutions segment in January 2017; 2) our Habits at Work business, the results of which are recorded in our Personal Information Services segment, in June 2017; and 3) the business comprising our Pet Health Monitoring segment in July 2017.
Corporate headquarter office transactions including, but not limited to, payroll, share based compensation and other expenses related to our Chairman and non-employee Board of Directors are reported in our Corporate business unit.
Our Insurance and Other Consumer Services segment includes insurance and membership products for consumers, delivered on a subscription basis. We are not planning to develop new business in this segment and are experiencing normal subscriber attrition due to ceased marketing and retention efforts. Some of our legacy subscriber portfolios have been cancelled, and our continued servicing of other subscribers may be cancelled as a result of actions taken by one or more financial institutions.
Prior to July 31, 2017, our Pet Health Monitoring segment included the health and wellness monitoring products and services for veterinarians and pet owners through our former subsidiary, i4c Innovations LLC ("i4c" or "Voyce"). Voyce generated substantial losses from formation to 2016 and, after concentrated efforts, was unable to generate an acceptable level of revenue. Effective July 31, 2017, we sold Voyce to a newly-formed entity of which Michael R. Stanfield, our Executive Chairman and President, is a minority investor. The results of this segment are reported as discontinued operations in accordance with U.S. GAAP in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. For additional information, please see Note
4
.
Prior to January 31, 2017, our Bail Bonds Industry Solutions segment included the automated service solutions for the bail bonds industry provided by Captira Analytical LLC ("Captira"). Effective January 31, 2017, we divested our ownership in Captira. This segment’s operating results, along with the operating results of Habits at Work, have not had a major effect on our consolidated financial results and are not classified as a discontinued operation. For additional information, please see Note
4
.
2
. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by us in accordance with U.S. GAAP and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and in management’s opinion reflect all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the periods presented. They include the accounts of the Company and our subsidiaries.
In conjunction with our singular refocus on our identity and privacy protection services, we changed our policy of allocating general and administrative expenses from our Corporate business unit into our other segments, which resulted in a change in our measurement of segment profit and loss. Beginning in 2017, we directly charge our Personal Information Services segment for the majority of general and administrative expenses including executive, legal, human resources, finance and internal audit expenses. We have elected not to recast our consolidated financial statements to reflect this change for the year ended December 31, 2016. For information on the effects of the change in measurement, please see Note
20
.
The information in our consolidated financial statements is presented for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
giving effect to the disposal of i4c, with the historical financial results of the Voyce business reflected as discontinued operations. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we did not allocate corporate overhead expenses to discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 or 2016. Additionally, we considered, and made the necessary adjustments to the historical financial results for,
the allocation of other costs to either discontinued or continuing operations, including, but not limited to, rent expense, severance expense and other wind-down costs. The result of these adjustments changed the historical operating results for certain segments as well as the presentation of the consolidated financial statements to include discontinued operations for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
. Unless otherwise indicated, the information in the notes to the consolidated financial statements refer only to our continuing operations and do not include discussion of balances or activity of i4c. For additional information, please see Note
4
.
All intercompany transactions have been eliminated from the consolidated statements of operations. The consolidated results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.
Revision to Previously Issued Financial Statements
Revenue for monthly subscriptions is recognized in the calendar month the subscription fee is earned. In 2017, we determined that our policy to recognize revenue from the sale of subscriptions should have been on a straight-line basis over the 30-day membership period, which results in a difference in the timing to recognize revenue on renewing 30-day subscriptions. As a result, to correct for the cumulative error, the December 31, 2016 consolidated balance sheet was revised by increasing current assets and current liabilities by
$1.5 million
and
$2.9 million
, respectively, and increasing accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 by
$1.4 million
. The revision did not impact the 2016 consolidated statements of operations or cash flows. Based upon an evaluation of all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors, and after considering the applicable provisions within U.S. GAAP, we concluded this misstatement was not material to any previously issued consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Restricted Cash
We classify cash as restricted when the cash is unavailable for withdrawal or usage for general operations. Our restricted cash represents cash collateral to
one
commercial bank for corporate credit cards and electronic payments. Restricted cash is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our consolidated balance sheets.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue on 1) identity theft protection services, 2) insurance services and 3) other monthly membership products and transaction services.
Our products and services are offered to consumers principally on a monthly subscription basis. Subscription fees billed by our clients are generally billed directly to the subscriber’s credit card, mortgage bill or demand deposit accounts. Subscription fees billed by us are generally billed directly to the subscriber’s credit card except for arrangements under which subscription fees are paid to us by our clients on behalf of the subscriber. The prices to subscribers of various configurations of our products and services range generally from
$4.99
to
$25.00
per month. As a means of allowing customers to become familiar with our services, our subscriptions periodically may be offered with trial, delayed billing or guaranteed refund periods. No revenues are recognized until applicable trial periods are completed.
Identity Theft Protection Services
We recognize revenue from our services when: a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists as we maintain signed contracts with all of our clients and paper and electronic confirmations with individual purchasers, b) delivery has occurred, c) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed as sales are generally based on contract or list prices and payments from organizations are collected within
30
days with no significant write-offs, and d) collectability is reasonably assured as individual customers pay by credit card which has limited our risk of non-collection.
Revenue for monthly subscriptions is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the service period. We also generate revenue through a collaborative arrangement, which involves joint marketing and servicing activities. We recognize our share of revenues and expenses from this arrangement.
Revenue for annual subscription fees must be deferred if the subscriber has the right to cancel the service and the service is earned over the year. Annual subscriptions include subscribers with full refund provisions at any time during the subscription period and pro-rata refund provisions. Revenue related to annual subscriptions with full refund provisions is recognized on the expiration of these refund provisions. Revenue related to annual subscribers with pro-rata provisions is recognized based on a pro-rata share of revenue earned. An allowance for discretionary subscription refunds is established based on our historical experience. For subscriptions with refund provisions whereby only the prorated subscription fee is refunded upon cancellation by the subscriber, deferred subscription fees are recorded when billed and amortized as subscription fee revenue on a straight-line basis over the subscription period, generally
one year
.
We record revenue on a gross basis in the amount that we bill the subscriber when our arrangements provide for us to serve as the primary obligor in the transaction, we have latitude in establishing price and we bear the credit risk for the amount billed to the subscriber. We also provide services for which certain clients are the primary obligors directly to their customers. We record revenue in the amount that we bill certain clients, and not the amount billed to their customers, when our client is the primary obligor, establishes the price to the customer and bears the credit risk. Revenue from these arrangements is recognized on a monthly basis when earned, which is at the time we provide the service.
Insurance Services
We recognize revenue from our services when: a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists as we maintain paper and electronic confirmations with individual purchasers, b) delivery has occurred, c) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed as the price of the product is agreed to by the customer as a condition of the sales transaction which established the sales arrangement, and d) collectability is reasonably assured as evidenced by our collection of revenue through the monthly mortgage payments of our customers or through checking account debits to our customers’ accounts. Revenues from insurance contracts are recognized when earned.
For insurance products, we record revenue on a net basis as we perform as an agent or broker for the insurance products without assuming the risks of ownership of the insurance products.
We participate in agency relationships with insurance carriers that underwrite insurance products offered by us. Accordingly, insurance premiums collected from customers and remitted to insurance carriers are excluded from our revenues and operating expenses. Insurance premiums collected but not remitted to insurance carriers as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
totaled
$340 thousand
and
$360 thousand
, respectively, and are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
Other Membership Products and Transaction Services
For other membership products, we record revenue on a gross basis as we serve as the primary obligor in the transactions, have latitude in establishing price and bear credit risk for the amount billed to the subscriber.
Goodwill, Identifiable Intangibles and Other Long-Lived Assets
We record, as goodwill, the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired in purchase transactions. We review our goodwill for impairment annually, as of October 31, or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. Goodwill is reflected as an asset in our Personal Information Services and Insurance and Other Consumer Services segments’ balance sheets, resulting from our acquisitions of Health at Work Wellness Actuaries LLC ("Habits at Work") and White Sky, Inc. ("White Sky") in 2015 as well as our prior acquisition of IISI Insurance Services Inc. ("IISI"), formerly known as Intersections Insurance Services Inc., in 2006.
On January 1, 2017, we prospectively adopted ASU 2017-04, "
Intangibles-Goodwill and Other
." In evaluating whether indicators of impairment exist, an initial assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the goodwill impairment test can be utilized (commonly referred to as the step zero approach). For reporting units in which the qualitative assessment concludes it is more likely than not that the fair value is more than its carrying value, the guidance eliminates the requirement to perform further goodwill impairment testing. Upon adoption of ASU 2017-04, we are not required to perform a qualitative assessment for our reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units where a significant change or event occurs, and where potential impairment indicators exist, we perform the quantitative assessment to test goodwill for impairment. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include, among others (a) a significant decline in our expected future cash flows; (b) a sustained, significant decline in our stock price and market capitalization; (c) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate; (d) unanticipated competition; (e) the testing for recoverability of a significant asset group within a reporting unit; and (f) slower growth rates. Any adverse change in these factors could have a significant impact on the recoverability of these assets and could have a material impact in our consolidated financial statements.
The quantitative assessment is a comparison of each reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. We estimate fair value using the best information available, using a combined income approach (discounted cash flow) and market based approach. The income approach measures the value of the reporting units by the present values of its economic benefits. These benefits can include revenue and cost savings. The market based approach measures the value of an entity through an analysis of recent sales or offerings of comparable companies and using revenue and other multiples of comparable companies as a reasonable basis to estimate our implied multiples. Value indications are developed by discounting expected cash flows to their present value at a rate of return that incorporates the risk-free rate for use of funds, trends within the industry, and risks associated with particular investments of similar type and quality as of the valuation date. In addition, we consider the uncertainty of realizing the projected cash flows in the analysis.
The estimated fair values of our reporting units are dependent on several significant assumptions, including our earnings projections, and cost of capital (discount rate). The projections use management’s best estimates of economic and market conditions
over the projected period including business plans, growth rates in sales, costs, and estimates of future expected changes in operating margins and cash expenditures. Other significant estimates and assumptions include terminal value growth rates, estimates of future capital expenditures, changes in future working capital requirements and overhead cost allocation, based on each reporting unit’s relative benefit received from the functions that reside in our Corporate business unit. We perform a detailed analysis of our Corporate overhead costs for purposes of establishing the overhead allocation baseline for the projection period. Overhead allocation methods include, but are not limited to, the percentage of the payroll within each reporting unit, allocation of existing support function costs based on estimated usage by the reporting units, and vendor specific costs incurred by Corporate that can be reasonably attributed to a particular reporting unit. These allocations are adjusted over the projected period in our discounted cash flow analysis based on the forecasted changing relative needs of the reporting units. Throughout the forecast period, the majority of Corporate’s total overhead expenses are allocated to our Personal Information Services reporting unit. We believe this overhead allocation method fairly allocates costs to each reporting unit, and we will continue to review, and possibly refine, these allocation methods as our businesses grow and mature. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and management’s judgment in applying each to the analysis of the recoverability of goodwill.
We estimate fair value giving consideration to both the income and market approaches. Consideration is given to the line of business and operating performance of the entities being valued relative to those of actual transactions, potentially subject to corresponding economic, environmental, and political factors considered to be reasonable investment alternatives.
If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, then a goodwill impairment loss is recognized for the amount that the carrying value of the reporting unit (including goodwill) exceeds its fair value, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
As of
December 31, 2017
, goodwill of
$347 thousand
resided in our Insurance and Other Consumer Services reporting unit and goodwill of
$9.4 million
resided in our Personal Information Services reporting unit. For additional information, please see Note
10
.
We review long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, property and equipment and other long-term assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the assets may not be fully recoverable. Significant judgments in this area involve determining whether a triggering event has occurred and determining the future cash flows for assets involved. In conducting our analysis, we would compare the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the long-lived assets to the related net book values. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the net book value, the long-lived assets are considered not to be impaired. If the net book value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, an impairment charge is measured and recognized. An impairment charge is measured as the difference between the net book value and the fair value of the long-lived assets. Fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows associated with these assets.
Intangible assets subject to amortization may include customer, marketing and technology related intangibles, as well as trademarks. Such intangible assets, excluding customer related intangibles, are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which are generally
two years
to
ten years
. Customer related intangible assets are amortized on either a straight-line or accelerated basis, depending upon the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset are consumed or otherwise used up.
Deferred Subscription Solicitation and Advertising
Our deferred subscription solicitation costs consist of subscription acquisition costs, including telemarketing, web-based marketing expenses, digital media and direct mail such as printing and postage. We expense advertising costs the first time advertising takes place, except for direct-response marketing costs. Telemarketing, web-based marketing and direct mail expenses are direct response marketing costs, which are amortized on a cost pool basis over the period during which the future benefits are expected to be received, but no more than
12 months
. The recoverability of amounts capitalized as deferred subscription solicitation costs are evaluated at each balance sheet date by comparing the carrying amounts of such assets on a cost pool basis to the probable remaining future benefit expected to result directly from such advertising costs. Probable remaining future benefit is estimated based upon historical subscriber patterns, and represents net revenues less costs incurred to earn those revenues. In estimating probable future benefit (on a per subscriber basis) we deduct our contractual cost to service that subscriber from the known sales price. We then apply the future benefit (on a per subscriber basis) to the number of subscribers expected to be retained in the future to arrive at the total probable future benefit. In estimating the number of subscribers we will retain (i.e., factoring in expected cancellations), we utilize historical subscriber patterns maintained by us that show attrition rates by client, product and marketing channel. The total probable future benefit is then compared to the costs of a given marketing campaign (i.e., cost pools), and if the probable future benefit exceeds the cost pool, the amount is considered to be recoverable. If direct response advertising costs were to exceed the estimated probable remaining future benefit, an adjustment would be made to the deferred subscription costs to the extent of any shortfall.
Commission Costs
Commissions that relate to annual subscriptions with full refund provisions and monthly subscriptions are expensed on a straight-line basis over the term of the service period, unless we are entitled to a refund of the commissions from our client. If annual
subscriptions are cancelled prior to their initial terms, we are generally entitled to a full refund of the previously paid commission for those annual subscriptions with a full refund provision and a pro-rata refund, equal to the unused portion of the subscription, for those annual subscriptions with a pro-rata refund provision. Commissions that relate to annual subscriptions with full commission refund provisions are deferred until the earlier of expiration of the refund privileges or cancellation. Once the refund privileges have expired, the commission costs are recognized ratably in the same pattern that the related revenue is recognized. Commissions that relate to annual subscriptions with pro-rata refund provisions are deferred and charged to operations as the corresponding revenue is recognized. If a subscription is cancelled, upon receipt of the refunded commission from our client, we record a reduction to the deferred commission.
Debt Issuance Costs
Debt issuance costs are capitalized and amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the life of the related debt agreements. The effective interest rate applied to the amortization is reviewed periodically and may change if actual principal repayments of the term loan differ from estimates. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, short-term and long-term debt are presented net of the unamortized debt issuance costs in our consolidated balance sheets.
Classification of Debt
On April 20, 2017, we refinanced our existing credit agreement dated as of March 21, 2016, as amended from time to time ("Prior Credit Agreement"), with a new
$20.0 million
term loan facility (as amended to date, the "New Credit Agreement"). Pursuant to the New Credit Agreement, we are required to make certain prepayments on our term loans in addition to scheduled quarterly repayments, including but not limited to asset dispositions, extraordinary receipts, excess cash flows (as defined in the New Credit Agreement) and certain equity issuances. Scheduled quarterly repayments and estimated prepayments that we expect to remit in the next twelve months, if any, are classified as the current portion of long-term debt in our consolidated financial statements, net of unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discount to be amortized in the next twelve months based on the current effective interest rate applied.
Share Based Compensation
We currently issue equity and equity-based awards under the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), and we have three inactive stock incentive plans: the 1999 Stock Option Plan, the 2004 Stock Option Plan and the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. Individual awards under the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan may take the form of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and/or restricted stock units.
The Compensation Committee administers the Plan, and the grants are approved by either the Compensation Committee or by appropriate members of Management in accordance with authority delegated by the Compensation Committee. Restricted stock units in the Plan that have expired, terminated, or been canceled or forfeited are available for issuance or use in connection with future awards.
We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value all options and the straight-line method to amortize this fair value as compensation cost over the requisite service period. The fair value of each option granted has been estimated as of the date of grant with the following weighted-average assumptions for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
.
Expected Dividend Yield.
Under the New Credit Agreement, we are currently prohibited from declaring and paying dividends and therefore, the dividend yield was
zero
for
2017
and
2016
.
Expected Volatility.
The expected volatility of options granted was estimated based upon our historical share price volatility based on the expected term of the underlying grants, or approximately
50%
and
45%
for
2017
and
2016
, respectively.
Risk-free Interest Rate.
The yield on actively traded non-inflation indexed U.S. Treasury notes was used to extrapolate an average risk-free interest rate based on the expected term of the underlying grants, or approximately
1.8%
and
1.1%
for
2017
and
2016
, respectively.
Expected Term.
The expected term of options granted was determined by considering employees’ historical exercise patterns, of approximately
4.6
and
4.8 years
for
2017
and
2016
, respectively. We will continue to review our estimate in the future and adjust it, if necessary, due to changes in our historical exercises.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, we granted performance-based restricted stock units ("PBRSUs"). In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we assess the probability that the performance conditions of the PBRSUs would be achieved and recorded share based compensation expense based on the probable outcome of that performance condition. Vesting of the PBRSUs was dependent upon continued employment and achievement of defined performance goals for the year, which were based upon Adjusted EBIDTA, as defined and determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. We recognized the shared based compensation expense ratably over the implied service period. The 2016 PBRSU grant vested by March 15, 2017 and we adjusted the shared based compensation expense throughout the vesting period based on our assessment of probability. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we did not grant any PBRSUs.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the applicable provisions of U.S. GAAP, which requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including projected future taxable income and future reversal of existing deferred tax assets and liabilities, sufficient sources of taxable income in available carryback periods, tax-planning strategies, and historical results of recent operations. The assumptions about future taxable income require significant judgment and are consistent with the plans and estimates we are using to manage the underlying businesses. In evaluating the objective evidence that historical results provide, we consider three trailing years of cumulative operating income (loss). Valuation allowances are provided, if, based upon the weight of the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Changes in tax laws and rates may affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities and our effective tax rate in the future.
We believe that our tax positions comply with applicable tax law. As a matter of course, we may be audited by various taxing authorities and these audits may result in proposed assessments where the ultimate resolution may result in us owing additional taxes. U.S. GAAP addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. We may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than
fifty percent
likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We have elected to include principal and penalties expense related to uncertain tax positions as part of income tax expense and include interest expense related to uncertain tax positions as part of interest expense in the consolidated financial statements. The accrued interest is included as a component of other long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. U.S. GAAP provides guidance on how an enterprise should determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits.
Our income tax expense and liability and/or receivable, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and liabilities for uncertain tax benefits reflect management’s best assessment of estimated current and future taxes to be paid or received. Significant judgments and estimates are required in determining the consolidated income tax expense.
Contingent Liabilities
We may become involved in litigation or other financial claims as a result of our normal business operations. We periodically analyze currently available information and make a determination of the probability of loss and provide a range of possible loss when we believe that sufficient and appropriate information is available. We accrue a liability for those contingencies where the incurrence of a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If a loss is probable and a range of amounts can be reasonably estimated but no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount in the range, then the minimum of the range is accrued. We do not accrue a liability when the likelihood that the liability has been incurred is believed to be probable but the amount cannot be reasonably estimated or when the likelihood that a liability has been incurred is believed to be only reasonably possible or remote. For contingencies where an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible and the impact could potentially be material, we disclose the nature of the contingency and, where feasible, an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss.
Variable Interest Entities
Our decision to consolidate an entity is based on our assessment that we have a controlling financial interest in such entity. We continuously evaluate our related party relationships and any ownership interests, including controlling or financial interests of our executive management team such as our Executive Chairman and President's non-controlling interest in One Health Group, LLC ("OHG"). In accordance with U.S. GAAP, since the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient for OHG to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, as well as economic interests of the holders of OHG that are disproportionate to their voting interests, we concluded OHG is a variable interest entity ("VIE"). We further analyzed which related party would be the primary beneficiary in a tiebreaker test. Given that neither we nor our de facto agent have the power to direct the activities of OHG that most significantly impact its economic performance, we determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the VIE and therefore are not required to consolidate the results of OHG. We do not have any assets or liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet that relate to our variable interest in OHG. Other than the potential participation in future revenue if and when earned, we have no material, continuing economic or other involvement in OHG, including no exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with OHG. Please see Note
4
for additional information related to the divestiture.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments, including those with an original maturity of
90 days
or less, to be cash equivalents.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment we purchase is recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from
three
to
five years
. Leased property meeting certain criteria is capitalized and the present value of the related lease payments is recorded as a liability and included in current and/or long-term debt based on the lease term. Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over the remaining lease term.
We develop software for our internal use and capitalize the estimated software development costs incurred during the application development stage in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Costs incurred prior to and after the application development stage are charged to expense. When the software is ready for its intended use, capitalization ceases and such costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated life, which is generally
three years
. We regularly review our capitalized software projects for impairment.
Fair Value Measurements
We account for certain assets and liabilities at fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The framework for measuring fair value provides a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1
— Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2
— Inputs to the valuation methodology include: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3
— Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
We do not have any instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Our goodwill, intangible and long-lived assets are subject to non-recurring fair value measurements.
For financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, inventory, leases payable, accounts payable and short-term debt, we consider the recorded value of the financial instruments to approximate the fair value based on the short-term nature of these financial instruments.
Treasury Stock
We account for treasury stock under the cost method and include treasury stock as a component of stockholders’ equity. In the year ended December 31, 2017, in connection with the New Credit Agreement, we repurchased approximately
419 thousand
shares of our common stock, pursuant to a redemption agreement from PEAK6 Capital Management LLC at a price of
$3.60
per share, for an aggregate repurchase price of approximately
$1.5 million
. PEAK6 Capital Management LLC is an affiliate of PEAK6 Investments. For additional information please see Note
15
. We did
not
repurchase any common stock in the year ended December 31,
2016
. In addition, as a result of shares withheld for tax purposes on the vesting of a restricted stock award, we increased our treasury shares by
103 thousand
and
76 thousand
in the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively.
3
. Accounting Standards Updates
We consider the applicability and impact of all Accounting Standards Updates ("ASUs"). ASUs not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard
|
|
Description
|
|
Date of Adoption
|
|
Application
|
|
Effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements (or Other Significant Matters)
|
ASU 2017-04,
Intangibles—
Goodwill and Other
(Topic 350)
|
|
The primary amendments in this update simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the amendments of this update, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value.
|
|
January 1, 2017
|
|
Prospective
|
|
We early adopted this update to reduce the cost and complexity of our annual and interim goodwill impairment analyses. There was no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
|
ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
|
|
This update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, by creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The guidance in this update affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the trade of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additionally, various updates have been issued during 2015 and 2016 to clarify the guidance in Topic 606.
|
|
January 1, 2018
|
|
1) Retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented, or
2) retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying these updates recognized at the date of initial application.
|
|
We will adopt the provisions of the new standard as of January 1, 2018. For additional information, see below. (1)
|
ASU 2016-02,
Leases
(Topic 842)
|
|
The primary amendments in this update require the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet, as well as certain qualitative disclosures regarding leasing arrangements.
|
|
January 1, 2019
|
|
Modified retrospective
|
|
We are currently in the planning stage and have not yet begun implementation of the new standard. We have not yet determined the potential impact to our consolidated financial statements.
|
ASU 2016-15,
Statement of Cash Flows
(Topic 230)
|
|
This update clarifies the guidance regarding the classification of operating, investing, and financing activities for certain types of cash receipts and payments.
|
|
January 1, 2018
|
|
Retrospective
|
|
Upon adoption, approximately $400 thousand of our loss on extinguishment of debt that occurred in 2017 will be retrospectively reclassified from operating to financing cash flows. We are currently unaware of any other material impacts of adoption on our consolidated financial statements.
|
ASU 2016-17,
Consolidation
(Topic 810)
|
|
This update amends the consolidation guidance on how a reporting entity that is the single decision maker of a variable interest entity (VIE) should treat indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the reporting entity that has a controlling financial interest in a VIE and, therefore, consolidates the VIE.
|
|
January 1, 2017
|
|
Retrospective
|
|
We adopted this update as of January 1, 2017, and there was no material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
|
ASU 2017-09,
Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718)
|
|
This update clarifies the guidance regarding changes in the terms or conditions of a share based payment award. Under the amendments of this update, an entity should account for the effects of a modification unless certain criteria remain the same immediately before and after the modification.
|
|
January 1, 2018
|
|
Prospective
|
|
We will adopt this update as of January 1, 2018, and do not anticipate any material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
(1)
|
We adopted the provisions of ASU 2014-09 as of January 1, 2018 on a modified retrospective basis. Our assessment of the impact included the review of the majority of our revenue streams, contracts and contract costs incremental to obtaining the contract. We concluded the impact to the way we recognize revenue is immaterial because our revenue is primarily generated from monthly subscriptions and longer-term breach contracts, which are currently recognized ratably over the service delivery period. In addition, we elected a practical expedient to immediately expense the majority of our incremental commission costs, which will not have a material impact to our future results of operations.
|
We also concluded that our deferred subscription solicitation and advertising costs must be expensed as incurred under the new standard. Since we currently defer certain subscription solicitation and advertising costs and amortize these costs to expense over the period during which benefits are expected to be received not to exceed twelve months, we believe this is a significant change that will impact our future results of operations on each reportable period.
As a result of our comprehensive assessment, we expect to record a cumulative adjustment of approximately
$1.3 million
to our stockholders’ equity upon adoption. Given the continued valuation allowance on our net deferred taxes, the tax effect of these cumulative adjustments at adoption is also immaterial to the consolidated financial statements. We identified the need for changes to our accounting policies, practices and controls to support the new revenue recognition standard, which we continue to assess and implement after adoption but before our next reporting period. We expect to provide the enhanced disclosures required by ASU 2014-09 in our next filing.
4
. Discontinued Operations and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale
On July 31, 2017, we divested i4c to One Health Group, LLC (the "Purchaser"), pursuant to the terms and conditions of a membership interest purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement"). i4c conducted our Pet Health Monitoring business known as Voyce. The purchase price for the assets was equal to (i) the sum of
$100
, plus (ii) a revenue participation of up to
$20.0 million
, payable pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement. We have determined that the revenue participation is a gain contingency and therefore will be recognized if and when it is earned.
The total value of the consideration paid pursuant to the Purchase Agreement was determined through negotiations that took into account a number of factors of the Pet Health Monitoring business, including historical revenues, operating history, business contracts, obligations and commitments and other factors. The terms of the transaction were approved by our independent directors of the Board of Directors and required the consent of our lender.
The Purchaser is a newly-formed entity of which Michael R. Stanfield, our Executive Chairman and President, is a minority investor, and certain former members of the i4c management team are the managing member and investors. Except as described above, there are no material relationships between the Purchaser, on the one hand, and us or any of our affiliates, directors, officers, or any associate of such directors or officers, on the other hand. For our policy on identifying a controlling financial interest, please see "—Variable Interest Entities" in Note
2
.
These consolidated financial statements present our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and our financial position as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 giving effect to the disposal of i4c, with the historical financial results of the Pet Health Monitoring segment reflected as discontinued operations, since the disposal constituted a strategic business shift. We made adjustments to our historical financial results for certain costs and overhead allocations to either discontinued or continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016; for additional information, please see "—Variable Interest Entities" in Note
2
.
In the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded a loss on sale of
$613 thousand
(including
$516 thousand
of transaction costs), which is included in loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in our consolidated statements of operations. The following table summarizes the components of loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes included in the consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Major classes of line items constituting loss from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
70
|
|
Marketing expenses
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
(1,552
|
)
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(1,421
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
(1,718
|
)
|
|
(15,604
|
)
|
Impairment
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
(7,043
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1,538
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
(1,921
|
)
|
|
(27,087
|
)
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations
|
|
(613
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
—
|
|
|
57
|
|
Total loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(2,534
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27,030
|
)
|
In 2016, our Board of Directors approved a plan to sell Captira, which comprises our Bail Bonds Industry Solutions segment. Captira met all the criteria under U.S. GAAP to classify its assets and liabilities as held for sale in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016. Effective January 31, 2017, we completed the sale of Captira for a nominal amount, which resulted in a loss on sale of
$130 thousand
and marks the conclusion of our operations in the Bail Bonds Industry Solutions segment. The disposal did not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on operations and financial results, and therefore, it is not classified as discontinued operations. For information on the operating results of the Bail Bonds Industry Solutions segment, please see "Item 7. —Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
The major classes of assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets that were included in discontinued operations related to the sale of Voyce (which comprised our Pet Health Monitoring segment), as well as the major classes of assets and liabilities held for sale related to Captira (which comprised our Bail Bonds Industry Solutions segment), consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
Carrying amounts of the major classes of assets included in discontinued operations:
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
8
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
153
|
|
Inventory
|
|
250
|
|
Total major classes of assets of the discontinued operations
|
|
471
|
|
Other assets in the disposal group classified as held for sale:
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
321
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
177
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
97
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
247
|
|
Other assets
|
|
6
|
|
Write-down to fair value
|
|
(744
|
)
|
Total other assets in the disposal group classified as held for sale:
|
|
104
|
|
Current assets of discontinued operations and assets held for sale
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amounts of the major classes of liabilities included in discontinued operations:
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
536
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
90
|
|
Accrued payroll and employee benefits
|
|
128
|
|
Total major classes of liabilities of the discontinued operations
|
|
754
|
|
Other liabilities in the disposal group classified as held for sale:
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
9
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
15
|
|
Accrued payroll and employee benefits
|
|
80
|
|
Total other liabilities in the disposal group classified as held for sale:
|
|
104
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations and liabilities held for sale
|
|
$
|
858
|
|
In March 2017, we executed an agreement to dispose of our Habits at Work business, the results of which are recorded in our Personal Information Services segment. Habits at Work met all the criteria under U.S. GAAP to classify its assets and liabilities as held for sale in our consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2017. Effective June 1, 2017, we completed the sale of Habits at Work for a nominal amount, which resulted in a gain on sale of
$24 thousand
. The disposal did not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on operations and financial results, and therefore, it is not classified as discontinued operations.
5
. Loss Per Common Share
Basic and diluted loss per common share is determined in accordance with the applicable provisions of U.S. GAAP. Basic loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per common share is equivalent to basic loss per common share, as U.S. GAAP provides that a loss cannot be diluted by potential
common stock, which includes the potential exercise of stock options under our share based employee compensation plans and vesting of our restricted stock/restricted stock units.
For the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, options to purchase common stock, unvested restricted stock units and warrants estimated to be
7.2 million
and
4.4 million
shares, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted income per common share as their effect would be anti-dilutive. The significant increase compared to the prior period is primarily due to the issuance of a warrant to purchase an aggregate of
1.5 million
shares in connection with the New Credit Agreement. These shares could dilute earnings per common share in the future.
A reconciliation of basic loss per common share to diluted loss per common share is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Net loss—basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
$
|
(11,790
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,439
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
(2,534
|
)
|
|
(27,030
|
)
|
Net loss available to common shareholders—basic and diluted
|
$
|
(14,324
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,469
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic
|
23,885
|
|
|
23,259
|
|
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted
|
23,885
|
|
|
23,259
|
|
Net loss per common share—basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
$
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
(1.16
|
)
|
Net loss per common share—basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.31
|
)
|
6
. Fair Value Measurement
Our cash and any investment instruments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as they are valued using quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The types of instruments valued are based on quoted market prices in active markets and are primarily U.S. government and agency securities and money market securities. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
As of
December 31, 2017
, the carrying value of our long-term debt approximated its fair value due to the variable interest rate. We did
not
have any transfers in or out of Level 1 and Level 2 in the years ended
December 31, 2017
or
2016
. We did
not
hold any significant instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2017
or
2016
.
The fair value of our instruments measured on a non-recurring basis as of
December 31, 2017
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using:
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
Total Gains (Losses)
|
Warrant
|
$
|
2,840
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,840
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The following is quantitative information about our significant unobservable inputs used in our Level 3 fair value measurements (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at December 31, 2017
|
|
Valuation Technique
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
Quantitative Inputs Used for Original Warrant
|
|
Quantitative Inputs Used for Replacement Warrant (1)
|
Warrant
|
$
|
2,840
|
|
|
Monte Carlo
|
|
Volatility of underlying
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free rate
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
2.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Probability of Designated Event (2)
|
|
0% - 50%
|
|
|
0% - 50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timing of Designated Event (2)
|
|
3-5 years from issuance
|
|
|
3-5 years from issuance
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
In connection with the Replacement Warrant, we received an additional payment of $700 thousand from PEAK6 Investments. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we performed valuations immediately before and after the equity modification and concluded that the additional payment approximately represented the incremental fair value provided by the Replacement Warrant.
For additional information, please see Note
15
.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Refers to certain change of control transactions, defined as a "Designated Event" as in the Warrant Agreement.
|
7
. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
The components of our prepaid expenses and other current assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Prepaid services
|
$
|
533
|
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
Other prepaid contracts
|
2,132
|
|
|
2,293
|
|
Restricted cash
|
240
|
|
|
265
|
|
Other
|
327
|
|
|
316
|
|
Total
|
$
|
3,232
|
|
|
$
|
3,711
|
|
8
. Deferred Subscription Solicitation and Commission Costs
Total deferred subscription solicitation and commission costs included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
was
$1.7 million
and
$5.1 million
, respectively. Amortization of deferred subscription solicitation and commission costs, which is included in either marketing or commission expense in our consolidated statements of operations, for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
were
$10.3 million
and
$12.6 million
, respectively. Marketing costs for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, which are included in marketing expenses in our consolidated statements of operations as they did not meet the criteria for deferral, were
$1.8 million
and
$1.5 million
, respectively.
Upon adoption of ASU 2014-09, "
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
," on January 1, 2018, we will no longer defer and amortize direct-response advertising costs
.
9
. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Machinery and equipment
|
$
|
15,752
|
|
|
$
|
15,345
|
|
Software
|
24,120
|
|
|
20,381
|
|
Software development-in-progress (1)
|
1,235
|
|
|
584
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
971
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
3,012
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
45,090
|
|
|
40,449
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
(34,050
|
)
|
|
(29,591
|
)
|
Less: held for sale, net
|
—
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
Property and equipment, net
|
$
|
11,040
|
|
|
$
|
10,611
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes costs associated with software projects which are still in the application development stage as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
and as such, are not being amortized.
|
Depreciation of property and equipment for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
was
$5.5 million
and
$4.8 million
, respectively. During the year ended
December 31, 2017
, we had retirements that reduced both our property and equipment and accumulated depreciation balances by
$318 thousand
. During the year ended
December 31, 2016
, we had retirements that reduced our property and equipment and accumulated depreciation balances by
$3.4 million
and
$2.3 million
, respectively, and we recorded impairments of property and equipment that reduced our property and equipment and accumulated depreciation balances by
$17 thousand
and
$1 thousand
, respectively.
We record internally developed capitalized software as a component of software in property and equipment in our consolidated balance sheets, and as such, we record depreciation for internally developed capitalized software in depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of operations. We regularly review our capitalized software projects for impairment. We had no impairments of internally developed capitalized software in the years ended
December 31, 2017
or
2016
.
Internally developed capitalized software consisted of the following during the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
Amount
|
|
Accumulated
Depreciation
|
|
Net Carrying
Amount
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
$
|
10,441
|
|
|
$
|
(5,888
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,553
|
|
Additions
|
5,179
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,179
|
|
Disposals
|
(605
|
)
|
|
434
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
Depreciation expense
|
—
|
|
|
(2,477
|
)
|
|
(2,477
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
15,015
|
|
|
(7,931
|
)
|
|
7,084
|
|
Additions
|
3,588
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,588
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
—
|
|
|
(3,898
|
)
|
|
(3,898
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
$
|
18,603
|
|
|
$
|
(11,829
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,774
|
|
Depreciation expense for the future periods related to capitalized software no longer in the application development stage is indicated below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ending December 31:
|
|
|
2018
|
$
|
3,596
|
|
2019
|
2,602
|
|
2020
|
576
|
|
Total
|
$
|
6,774
|
|
Leased property consisting of machinery and equipment held under capital leases and included in property and equipment consisted of the following as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Leased property consisting of machinery and equipment
|
$
|
2,188
|
|
|
$
|
2,093
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
(1,356
|
)
|
|
(737
|
)
|
Leased property, net
|
$
|
832
|
|
|
$
|
1,356
|
|
During the year ended
December 31, 2017
, we did not enter into any new capital lease arrangements for fixed assets. During the year ended
December 31, 2016
, we entered into additional capital leases for fixed assets with acquisition values of approximately
$884 thousand
. In the year ended
December 31, 2017
, we had no disposals of fixed assets. In the year ended
December 31, 2016
, we disposed of fixed assets, primarily fulfillment equipment, subject to capital lease with an acquisition value of
$1.7 million
and accumulated depreciation of
$1.0 million
.
10
. Goodwill and Intangibles
Goodwill
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal
Information
Services
Reporting Unit
|
|
Insurance and
Other Consumer
Services
Reporting Unit
|
|
Bail Bonds
Industry
Solutions
Reporting Unit
|
|
Totals
|
Balance as of December 31, 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount
|
$
|
35,253
|
|
|
$
|
10,665
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
45,918
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
(25,837
|
)
|
|
(10,318
|
)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
(36,155
|
)
|
Net carrying value of goodwill
|
9,416
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
9,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount
|
$
|
35,253
|
|
|
$
|
10,665
|
|
|
$
|
1,390
|
|
|
47,308
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
(25,837
|
)
|
|
(10,318
|
)
|
|
(1,390
|
)
|
|
(37,545
|
)
|
Net carrying value of goodwill
|
9,416
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9,763
|
|
We performed the following interim and annual (October 31) goodwill impairment tests. The results are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting Unit
|
|
Impairment Test Date
|
|
Fair value substantially in excess of carrying value
|
|
Percentage, if not substantially in excess
|
|
Impairment charge (in thousands)
|
Personal Information Services (1)
|
|
October 31, 2017
|
|
Yes
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
Insurance and Other Consumer Services (1)
|
|
October 31, 2017
|
|
Yes
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
Personal Information Services
|
|
October 31, 2016
|
|
Yes
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
Insurance and Other Consumer Services (2)
|
|
August 31, 2016
|
|
Yes
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
(1)
|
As of October 31, 2017, both our Personal Information Services and Insurance and Other Consumer Services reporting units had a negative carrying amount of net assets. Upon the adoption of ASU 2017-04, we are no longer required to perform a qualitative assessment for reporting units with negative carrying amounts to determine if additional impairment testing is required. For additional information, please see Note
3
. We considered other qualitative and quantitative factors and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value was substantially in excess of the negative carrying value for each of our reporting units.
|
|
|
(2)
|
As of October 31, 2016, our annual testing date, we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value was substantially in excess of its carrying value based upon qualitative factors and the results of our interim impairment test. We tested for impairment as of August 31, 2016 due to the reclassification of our Habits at Work business from our Insurance and Other Consumer Services segment to our Personal Information Services segment. Therefore, it was not necessary to perform the first step of the impairment testing for the Insurance and Other Consumer Services reporting unit at October 31, 2016.
|
As of
December 31, 2017
, we believe that both the estimated fair values of our Personal Information Services and Insurance and Other Consumer Services reporting units are substantially in excess of their respective carrying values and therefore are not at-risk
of being impaired. To the extent our Personal Information Services or Insurance and Other Consumer Services reporting units realize actual operating results in the future below forecasted results, or realize decreases in forecasted results as compared to previous forecasts (including, but not limited to, actual to forecasted negative variances as the result of increased subscriber cancellation rates or significant subscriber portfolio cancellations), or in the event the estimated fair value of those reporting units decrease (as a result, among other things, of changes in market capitalization, including further declines in our stock price), we may incur goodwill impairment charges in the future. Future impairment charges on our Personal Information Services reporting unit will be recognized in the operating results of our Personal Information Services segment and our Insurance and Other Consumer Services segment, based on a pro-rata allocation of goodwill.
Intangible Assets
Our intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
Impairment
|
|
Net
Carrying
Amount
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer related
|
$
|
38,831
|
|
|
$
|
(38,831
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Marketing related
|
2,727
|
|
|
(2,709
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
18
|
|
Technology related
|
1,739
|
|
|
(1,699
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
40
|
|
Total amortizable intangible assets at December 31, 2017
|
$
|
43,297
|
|
|
$
|
(43,239
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer related
|
$
|
38,874
|
|
|
$
|
(38,822
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
Marketing related
|
3,336
|
|
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
55
|
|
Technology related
|
4,068
|
|
|
(3,197
|
)
|
|
(751
|
)
|
|
120
|
|
Subtotal
|
46,278
|
|
|
(45,162
|
)
|
|
(906
|
)
|
|
210
|
|
Less: held for sale
|
(2,056
|
)
|
|
1,818
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total amortizable intangible assets at December 31, 2016
|
$
|
44,222
|
|
|
$
|
(43,344
|
)
|
|
$
|
(668
|
)
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
During the year ended
December 31, 2017
, there were no adverse changes in our long-lived assets, which would cause a need for an impairment analysis. Intangible assets decreased in the year ended
December 31, 2016
primarily due to the full impairment of assets associated with our Pet Health Monitoring segment and Habits at Work business, both of which were sold in 2017.
Intangible assets are amortized over a period of
two
to
ten
years. For the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
we had an aggregate amortization expense of
$152 thousand
and
$513 thousand
, respectively, which was included in amortization expense in our consolidated statements of operations. We estimate that we will have the following amortization expense for the future periods indicated below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ending December 31, 2018
|
$
|
58
|
|
Total
|
$
|
58
|
|
11
. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
The components of our accrued expenses and other current liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Accrued marketing
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
1,121
|
|
Accrued cost of sales, including credit bureau costs
|
5,044
|
|
|
5,451
|
|
Accrued general and administrative expense and professional fees
|
570
|
|
|
2,137
|
|
Insurance premiums
|
340
|
|
|
360
|
|
Estimated liability for non-income business taxes
|
783
|
|
|
94
|
|
Other
|
1,641
|
|
|
1,815
|
|
Total
|
$
|
8,533
|
|
|
$
|
10,978
|
|
We may have non-income business tax obligations in certain states and other jurisdictions. In the year ended
December 31, 2017
, we increased our liability by
$689 thousand
. For additional information, please see "—Other" in Note
16
.
12
. Accrued Payroll and Employee Benefits
The components of our accrued payroll and employee benefits are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Accrued payroll
|
$
|
808
|
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
Accrued benefits
|
408
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
Accrued severance
|
285
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
Total accrued payroll and employee benefits
|
$
|
1,501
|
|
|
$
|
4,128
|
|
In the year ended
December 31, 2017
, we recorded and paid executive management bonuses of
$1.0 million
, which were approved by the Compensation Committee. Additionally, in the year ended
December 31, 2017
we revised our vacation policy, which resulted in a one-time, non-cash benefit and a decrease of
$1.1 million
to the accrued benefits liability.
The following table summarizes our accrued severance activity during the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
$
|
1,440
|
|
|
$
|
4,148
|
|
Adjustments to expense
|
1,714
|
|
|
1,489
|
|
Payments
|
(2,869
|
)
|
|
(4,197
|
)
|
Balance, end of period
|
$
|
285
|
|
|
$
|
1,440
|
|
13
. Income Taxes
The components of income tax benefit (expense) from continuing operations for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(125
|
)
|
State
|
17
|
|
|
50
|
|
Total current income tax benefit (expense)
|
17
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
1,958
|
|
|
—
|
|
State
|
(60
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Total deferred income tax benefit (expense)
|
1,898
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total income tax benefit (expense)
|
$
|
1,915
|
|
|
$
|
(75
|
)
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves and accrued expenses
|
$
|
1,969
|
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
Share based compensation
|
2,381
|
|
|
2,636
|
|
Intangible assets
|
1,564
|
|
|
3,679
|
|
Credit carryforwards
|
2,486
|
|
|
2,148
|
|
Net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards
|
16,701
|
|
|
21,117
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
25,101
|
|
|
32,077
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
(23,714
|
)
|
|
(30,746
|
)
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
1,387
|
|
|
1,331
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
(444
|
)
|
|
(2,017
|
)
|
Property, plant, and equipment
|
(950
|
)
|
|
(1,219
|
)
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
(1,394
|
)
|
|
(3,236
|
)
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,905
|
)
|
We continue to provide for a valuation allowance on our net deferred tax assets after our evaluation of all significant positive and negative evidence including, but not limited to, our three-year cumulative loss, as adjusted for permanent items; insufficient sources of taxable income in prior carryback periods in order to utilize all of the existing definite-lived net deferred tax assets; unavailability of prudent and feasible tax-planning strategies; the amount of our projected taxable income; and scheduling of the future reversals of existing temporary differences. The remaining deferred tax liability at December 31, 2017 decreased from 2016 in accordance with the provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 ("Tax Act") described below.
The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable as of
December 31, 2017
could be adjusted if facts and circumstances in future reporting periods change, including, but not limited to, generating sufficient future taxable income in the carryforward periods.
Below is a summary of our estimated loss and tax credit carryforwards. Utilization of federal and state net operating losses could be subject to limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code and applicable state law. If certain substantial changes in the entity’s ownership were to occur, there would be an annual limitation on the amount of the carryforwards that can be utilized in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Effected
|
|
Expiration
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Federal net operating loss carryforward
|
$
|
10,586
|
|
|
2037
|
Federal general business credits
|
$
|
2,486
|
|
|
2034 - 2037
|
Federal capital loss carryforwards
|
$
|
2,153
|
|
|
2019 - 2020
|
State net operating loss carryforwards
|
$
|
3,364
|
|
|
2018 - 2037
|
State capital loss carryforwards
|
$
|
599
|
|
|
2019 - 2020
|
The reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal tax rate of
35%
to our effective tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Income tax benefit at federal statutory rate
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income tax benefit, net of federal benefit
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
54.4
|
%
|
Nondeductible executive compensation
|
-5.6
|
%
|
|
-5.2
|
%
|
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
|
-55.6
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Change in valuation allowances
|
42.6
|
%
|
|
-72.2
|
%
|
Discrete adjustments for stock based compensation
|
-3.7
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
General business credit
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
19.6
|
%
|
Federal return to provision
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
-6.1
|
%
|
Other
|
-3.2
|
%
|
|
-27.7
|
%
|
Net income tax benefit (expense)
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
-2.2
|
%
|
Our consolidated effective tax rate for the year ended
December 31, 2017
was
14.0%
compared to
(2.2)%
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to estimated impacts of the broad and complex changes in the Tax Act,
which was enacted in 2017 and resulted in the reduction of the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets, which will become indefinite-lived under the future net operating loss carryforward rules, and the repeal of the corporate alternative minimum tax.
While we continue to evaluate the effects of the Tax Act, we have recorded an estimated net tax benefit of
$1.9 million
in 2017. In the absence of guidance on various uncertainties and ambiguities in the application of certain provisions of the Tax Act, we have used what we believe are reasonable interpretations and assumptions in applying the Tax Act. Given the complexity of the changes in tax law resulting from the Tax Act, we have not finalized the accounting for the income tax effects of the Tax Act, including any of the provisional amounts described above. During the one-year measurement period allowed under Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, we may make adjustments that differ from our initial assumptions based on new interpretations and regulatory changes from the Internal Revenue Service and state tax jurisdictions, the SEC and the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Amounts will be recorded as discrete items in the provision for income taxes in the period in which those adjustments become final. We will complete our analysis no later than December 31, 2018. It is possible that future adjustments may have a material adverse effect on our cash tax liabilities, results of operations, or financial condition.
The following table summarizes the activity related to our unrecognized tax benefits, including penalties but excluding interest, for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Unrecognized tax benefit, beginning of period
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
$
|
1,774
|
|
Gross increases, tax positions in current period
|
98
|
|
|
185
|
|
Gross increases, tax positions in prior period
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
Gross decreases, tax positions in prior period
|
(3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefit, end of period
|
$
|
2,055
|
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
During the year ended
December 31, 2017
, we increased our gross unrecognized tax benefits primarily related to a portion of an estimated current year general business credit. The majority of the balance of the unrecognized tax benefits as of
December 31, 2017
, if recognized, would have an impact on our consolidated effective tax rate. We did
not
have gross decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities during the years ended
December 31, 2017
or
2016
.
In the years ended
December 31, 2017
or
2016
, we incurred interest expense of
$88 thousand
and
$74 thousand
, respectively. In the years ended
December 31, 2017
or
2016
, we did
not
have any decreases to interest expense related to our unrecognized tax benefits.
The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various state jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2017, we were subject to examination in the U.S. federal tax jurisdiction beginning in the 2010 tax year and in various state jurisdictions for the 2006 through 2016 tax years. We are currently under federal examination for tax years 2010 through 2015 related to general business credits claimed. As of December 31, 2017, we were not aware of any proposed tax adjustments and we have not made changes to the measurement or amount of uncertain tax benefits previously recorded. Subsequent to December 31, 2017, we reviewed and agreed to the IRS revenue agent’s proposed adjustments to our credits claimed in tax years 2010 and 2011. We do not believe the outcome of the IRS audit will have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
We believe it is reasonably possible we could reduce our unrecognized tax benefits by up to
$1.2 million
within the next twelve months, primarily related to the settlement of general business credits refunded under audit, which would also reduce the income tax receivable and the income tax provision in our consolidated financial statements.
14
. Related Party Transactions
Digital Matrix Systems, Inc.
— The Chief Executive Officer and President of Digital Matrix Systems, Inc. (“DMS”) serves as one of our board members. We have service agreements with DMS for monitoring credit on a daily and quarterly basis, along with occasional contracts for certain credit analysis and application development services. In connection with these agreements, we paid monthly installments totaling
$2.5 million
and
$1.7 million
in the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively. These amounts are included within cost of services revenue and general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations. As of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, we owed
$178 thousand
and
$162 thousand
, respectively, to DMS under these agreements.
Loeb Partners Corporation –
In connection with the closing of the Prior Credit Agreement, we paid
$553 thousand
in advisory fees to Loeb Partners Corporation in the year ended December 31, 2016. Loeb Partners Corporation is an affiliate of Loeb Holding Corporation. One of the members of our Board of Directors is the beneficial owner of a majority of the voting stock of Loeb Holding Corporation, and is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Loeb Partners Corporation.
PEAK6 Investments, L.P.
-
During 2017, we refinanced our existing senior secured indebtedness under the Prior Credit Agreement with the New Credit Agreement with PEAK6 Investments, L.P. ("PEAK6 Investments"), which had a principal outstanding amount of
$21.5 million
as of
December 31, 2017
. In connection with the New Credit Agreement, we paid PEAK6 Investments
$1.5 million
for the repurchase of common stock, and we received a total of
$2.2 million
for the issuance of the Warrant. In the year ended
December 31, 2017
, we paid interest of
$1.4 million
. PEAK6 Investments owned approximately
419 thousand
shares of our common stock immediately prior to the closing of the New Credit Agreement. For additional information, please see Note
15
.
One Health Group, LLC
-
On July 31, 2017, we entered into and consummated the divestiture of Voyce to One Health Group, LLC (the "Purchaser"), pursuant to the terms and conditions of a membership interest purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") between our wholly owned subsidiary and the Purchaser. The purchase price for the Interests (the "Purchase Price") is equal to (i) the sum of one hundred dollars (
$100
), paid in cash at closing, plus (ii) a revenue participation of up to
$20.0 million
(the "Maximum Amount"), payable pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement.
The Purchaser is a newly-formed entity of which Michael R. Stanfield, our Executive Chairman and President, is a significant minority investor, and certain former members of the Voyce management team are the managing member and investors.
Monde of Events
-
The Chief Executive Officer of Monde of Events is the spouse of our Chief Operating Officer. We have retained Monde of Events to provide event planning services for our corporate events. In the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we paid Monde of Events
$123 thousand
and
$106 thousand
, respectively, for these services. As of December 31, 2017, there were
no
amounts due to Monde of Events.
15
. Debt and Other Financing
Debt
In March 2016, we and our subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement with Crystal Financial SPV LLC ("Prior Credit Agreement"). The Prior Credit Agreement provided for a
$20.0 million
senior secured term loan, which was fully funded at closing, with a maturity date of March 21, 2019 and interest at the greater of LIBOR plus
10%
per annum or
10.5%
per annum. As of December 31, 2016,
$13.4 million
was outstanding, which was presented net of unamortized debt issuance costs of
$1.2 million
in our consolidated balance sheets in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
In April 2017, we refinanced our indebtedness under the Prior Credit Agreement with a new term loan facility with PEAK6 Investments. We also executed amendments to the new term loan facility in July and November 2017 (together with the amendments, the "New Credit Agreement"), which had a principal outstanding amount of
$21.5 million
as of
December 31, 2017
and an initial interest rate of
9.99%
per annum, to be adjusted annually on March 31 to
8.25%
plus 1 year LIBOR. The maturity date of the New Credit Agreement is April 20, 2021 with quarterly principal payments of
$1.3 million
commencing on September 30, 2019. The New Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all our assets and a pledge by us of stock and membership interests we hold in any domestic and first-tier foreign subsidiaries.
We used approximately
$13.9 million
of the net proceeds from the New Credit Agreement to repay in full the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Prior Credit Agreement and to pay interest, prepayment penalties, transaction fees and expenses as a result of the termination. We are using the remainder of the proceeds from the New Credit Agreement for general corporate purposes, including to increase subscriber acquisitions and continue our innovative product development. As a result of the refinancing, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of
$1.5 million
in the year ended
December 31, 2017
, including interest,
prepayment penalties, transaction fees and expenses totaling approximately
$487 thousand
as a result of the termination of the Prior Credit Agreement.
The New Credit Agreement requires the prepayment of the aggregate principal amount outstanding in an amount equal to
25%
of our excess cash flow (as defined in the New Credit Agreement) for each fiscal year commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 and continuing thereafter. Certain other events defined in the New Credit Agreement require prepayment of the aggregate principal amount of the term loan, including all or a portion of proceeds received from asset dispositions (except for proceeds from the sale of assets in our i4c subsidiary), casualty events, extraordinary receipts, and certain equity issuances. Once amounts borrowed have been paid or prepaid, they may not be reborrowed.
Under the New Credit Agreement, minimum required maturities are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ending December 31:
|
|
2018
|
—
|
|
2019
|
1,250
|
|
2020
|
5,000
|
|
2021
|
15,250
|
|
Total outstanding
|
$
|
21,500
|
|
As of
December 31, 2017
,
$21.5 million
was outstanding under the New Credit Agreement, which is presented net of unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discount totaling
$764 thousand
in our consolidated balance sheets in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As of
December 31, 2017
,
none
of the outstanding balance is classified as short-term.
The New Credit Agreement contains certain customary covenants, including a requirement to maintain at all times a minimum cash on hand amount of the lesser of
20%
or certain stated amounts of the total amount outstanding under the term loan, as set forth in the New Credit Agreement, and minimum EBITDA requirements. As of
December 31, 2017
, we were in compliance with all such covenants. The New Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default, including among other things non-payment defaults, covenant defaults, inaccuracy of representations and warranties, bankruptcy and insolvency defaults, material judgment defaults, ERISA defaults, cross-defaults to other indebtedness, invalidity of loan documents defaults, change in control defaults, conduct of business defaults, and criminal and regulatory action defaults. For additional information, please see "—Liquidity and Capital Resources" in Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
Warrant
In connection with the New Credit Agreement, PEAK6 Investments purchased, for an aggregate purchase price of
$1.5 million
in cash, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of
1.5 million
shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$5.00
per share ("Original Warrant”). In connection with a later amendment to the New Credit Agreement, we issued a warrant to PEAK6 Investments for an additional purchase price of
$700 thousand
in cash ("Replacement Warrant"), and PEAK6 Investments surrendered the Original Warrant previously issued by us on April 20, 2017. The Replacement Warrant provides PEAK6 with the right to purchase an aggregate of
1.5 million
shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$2.50
per share. The Replacement Warrant is immediately exercisable, has a
five
-year term and shall be exercised solely by a “net share settlement” feature that requires the holder to exercise the Replacement Warrant without a cash payment upon the terms set forth therein. Warrants are valued on our balance sheet at
$2.8 million
as of December 31, 2017. For additional information related to the fair value of the warrants, please see Note
6
.
Stock Redemption
In connection with the New Credit Agreement, we used the proceeds from the sale of the Original Warrant to repurchase approximately
419 thousand
shares of our common stock, pursuant to a redemption agreement from PEAK6 Capital Management LLC at a price of
$3.60
per share, for an aggregate repurchase price of approximately
$1.5 million
. PEAK6 Capital Management LLC is an affiliate of PEAK6 Investments.
The repurchase was made pursuant to our previously announced share repurchase program. Following the repurchase, we have approximately
$15.3 million
remaining under our repurchase program. The repurchases may be made on the open market, in block trades, through privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, and the program may be suspended or discontinued at any time. However, we are currently prohibited from repurchasing any shares of common stock under the New Credit Agreement.
16
. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
We have entered into long-term operating lease agreements for office space and capital leases for fixed assets. The minimum fixed commitments related to all non-cancellable leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31,
|
|
Operating
Leases
|
|
Capital
Leases
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
2018
|
|
$
|
3,390
|
|
|
$
|
494
|
|
2019
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
400
|
|
2020
|
|
110
|
|
|
20
|
|
2021
|
|
93
|
|
|
7
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
5,059
|
|
|
921
|
|
Less: amount representing interest
|
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
Present value of minimum lease payments
|
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
Less: current obligation
|
|
|
|
|
(423
|
)
|
Long-term obligations under capital lease
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
392
|
|
During the year ended
December 31, 2017
, we did not enter into any new capital lease arrangements. During the year ended
December 31, 2016
, we entered into additional capital lease agreements for approximately
$884 thousand
. We recorded the lease liability at the fair market value of the underlying assets in our consolidated balance sheets. Rental expenses included in general and administrative expenses for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
were
$3.2 million
and
$3.0 million
, respectively.
Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, we may become involved in various legal proceedings. Except as stated below, we know of no pending or threatened legal proceedings to which we are or will be a party that, if successful, would result in a material adverse change in our business or financial condition.
In July 2012, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) served a Civil Investigative Demand on Intersections Inc. with respect to its billing practices for identity protection and credit monitoring products sold and enrolled through depositary customers. An action was filed on
July 1, 2015
in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division, and a Stipulated Final Judgment and Order (the “Order”) concurrently entered, entitled Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Intersections Inc. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, we agreed to implement a satisfactory compliance plan to comply with the Order and to provide a progress update. We paid a civil monetary penalty of
$1.2 million
in 2015, and in the year ended December 31, 2016, we paid
$63 thousand
to
661
customers who had not previously received refunds for periods where the full benefit of the service was not delivered. Intersections also submitted an amended compliance plan to the CFPB in early 2017.
In January 2013, the Office of the West Virginia Attorney General ("WVAG") served Intersections Insurance Services Inc. ("IISI") with a complaint filed in the Circuit Court of Mason County, West Virginia on October 2, 2012. The complaint alleges violations of West Virginia consumer protection laws based on the marketing of unspecified products. On April 21, 2017, the Court granted a motion of the WVAG to add Intersections Inc. as a defendant to the lawsuit. The parties are currently engaged in discovery. No trial has been scheduled. We continue to believe that the claims in the complaint are without merit and intend to continue to vigorously defend this matter.
On March 22, 2018, Johan Roets, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, filed a civil Complaint against the Company in the Circuit Court of Fairfax County Virginia. The Complaint alleges that the Company’s termination of Mr. Roets’ employment on February 22, 2018 violated his Employment Agreement and seeks monetary damages from the Company. The Company believes that the Complaint is without merit and plans to vigorously defend this litigation.
For information regarding our policy for analyzing legal proceedings, please see “Contingent Liabilities” in Note
2
. As of
December 31, 2017
, we do
not
have any significant liabilities accrued for any of the legal proceedings mentioned above. We believe based on information currently available that the amount, if any, accrued for the above contingencies is adequate. However, legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable and, although we believe that accruals are adequate and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against such matters, unfavorable resolution could occur, which could have a material effect in our consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole.
Other
We periodically analyze our facts and circumstances related to potential obligations in state jurisdictions, including the delivery nature of our services, the relationship through which our services are offered, and changing state laws and interpretations of those laws, and have determined we may have indirect tax obligations in state and other jurisdictions.
The following table summarizes the non-income business tax liability activity during the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
3,427
|
|
Adjustments to existing liabilities
|
1,516
|
|
|
(2,110
|
)
|
Payments
|
(827
|
)
|
|
(1,223
|
)
|
Balance, end of year
|
$
|
783
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
We continue to analyze what obligations we have, if any, to state taxing authorities. As a result of an audit by a state for non-income business taxes, for which an assessment was received in the year ended
December 31, 2017
, we recorded a liability of
$936 thousand
in the same period for the underpayment of taxes and related interest, which was recorded primarily in cost of revenue in our consolidated statements of operations. Additionally, we recorded an estimated liability of
$580 thousand
for the potential underpayment in other jurisdictions. We analyzed all the information available to us in order to estimate a liability for potential obligations in other jurisdictions including, but not limited to: the delivery nature of our services; the relationship through which our services are offered; the probability of obtaining resale or exemption certificates; limited, if any, nexus-creating activity; and our historical success in settling or abating liabilities under audit. We continue to correspond with the applicable authorities in an effort toward resolution of our potential liabilities using a variety of settlement options including, but not limited to, voluntary disclosures, negotiation and standard appeals process, and we may adjust the liability as a result of such correspondence. Proceedings with jurisdictions are inherently unpredictable, but we believe it is reasonably possible that other states may approach us or that the scope of the taxable base in any state may also increase.
We have entered into various software licenses and operational commitments totaling approximately
$70.6 million
as of
December 31, 2017
,
payable in monthly and yearly installments through December 31, 2021.
These amounts will be expensed on a pro-rata basis and recorded in cost of services revenue and general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.
17
. Other Long-Term Liabilities
The components of our other long-term liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Deferred rent
|
$
|
1,223
|
|
|
$
|
1,850
|
|
Uncertain tax positions, interest and penalties not recognized
|
1,669
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
Accrued general and administrative expenses
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
Total other long-term liabilities
|
$
|
2,895
|
|
|
$
|
3,436
|
|
For additional information regarding the change in uncertain tax positions, see Note
13
.
18
. Stockholders’ Equity
Outstanding Securities
Our authorized capital stock consists of
50 million
shares of common stock, par value
$0.01
per share, and
5 million
shares of preferred stock, par value
$.01
per share. As of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, there were approximately
24.1 million
and
23.7 million
shares, respectively, of our common stock outstanding and
no
shares of preferred stock outstanding. As of
December 31, 2017
, a warrant was outstanding to purchase
1.5 million
shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$2.50
per share. The Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to
5 million
shares of preferred stock and to fix the price, rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions, including voting rights, of those shares without any further vote or action by the stockholders. Holders of common stock are entitled to
one
vote per share in the election of directors and on all other matters on which stockholders are entitled or permitted to vote. Holders of common stock are not entitled to cumulative voting rights. Therefore, holders of a majority of the shares voting for the election of directors can elect all the directors. Holders of common stock are entitled to dividends in amounts and at times as may be declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available. Upon liquidation or dissolution, holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all net assets available for distribution to stockholders after payment of any liquidation preferences to holders of preferred stock. Holders of common stock have no redemption, conversion or preemptive rights.
Share Repurchase and Dividends
In April 2005, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program under which we can repurchase our outstanding shares of common stock from time to time, depending on market conditions, share price and other factors. As of
December 31, 2017
, we had approximately
$15.3 million
remaining under our share repurchase program. The repurchases may be made on the open market, in block trades, through privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, and the program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
During the year ended
December 31, 2017
, we repurchased
419 thousand
shares of common stock in connection with the New Credit Agreement. We did not repurchase any shares of common stock in the year ended
December 31, 2016
. As a result of shares withheld for tax purposes on the vesting of a restricted stock award, we increased our treasury shares by
103 thousand
and
76 thousand
in the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively.
Under the New Credit Agreement, we are currently prohibited from repurchasing any shares of common stock, as well as declaring and paying ordinary cash or stock dividends.
Share Based Compensation
As of
December 31, 2017
, we have
3.3 million
shares of common stock available for future grants of awards under the Plan, and awards for approximately
5.7 million
shares are outstanding under all of our active and inactive plans. In April 2017, our Board of Directors approved a second amendment to the 2014 Plan to increase the number of shares authorized and reserved for issuance thereunder by
4.0 million
shares, from
5.5 million
shares to
9.5 million
shares. The amendment was effective immediately upon our stockholders' approval in May 2017.
Stock Options
Total share based compensation expense recognized for stock options, which was included in general and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of operations, for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
was
$3.2 million
and
$80 thousand
, respectively. The increase is due to grants of
2.1 million
options in 2017, the majority of which were fully expensed on each grant date due to a retirement-age specific provision in our Executive Chairman and President's employment and award agreements.
The following table summarizes our stock option activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
(in years)
|
Outstanding, beginning of year
|
861,366
|
|
|
$
|
3.99
|
|
|
778,590
|
|
|
$
|
5.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
2,146,190
|
|
|
$
|
3.85
|
|
|
379,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
(74,324)
|
|
|
$
|
6.71
|
|
|
(296,224)
|
|
|
$
|
5.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year (1)
|
2,933,232
|
|
|
$
|
3.82
|
|
|
861,366
|
|
|
$
|
3.99
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
7.50
|
Exercisable at end of the year
|
408,042
|
|
|
$
|
5.07
|
|
|
482,366
|
|
|
$
|
5.33
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
1.44
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes
658 thousand
unvested options granted to a former employee. For additional information, please see Note
22
.
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted, based on the Black Scholes method, during the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
was
$1.69
and
$0.94
, respectively.
For options exercised, intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the market price on the date of exercise and the exercise price. There were
no
options exercised during the years ended
December 31, 2017
or
2016
.
As of
December 31, 2017
, there was
$734 thousand
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock option arrangements granted under the Plan, all of which related to the options granted to a former employee (see Note
22
). As of
December 31, 2017
, that cost was expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
1.2
years.
The following table summarizes information about employee stock options outstanding at
December 31, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
Exercise Price
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
|
|
Weighted
Average Exercise
Price
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0 — $5.00
|
2,801,699
|
|
7.77
|
|
$
|
3.61
|
|
|
276,509
|
|
$
|
3.57
|
|
$5.01 — $10.00
|
105,783
|
|
1.38
|
|
$
|
6.76
|
|
|
105,783
|
|
$
|
6.76
|
|
$10.01 — $15.00
|
25,750
|
|
2.91
|
|
$
|
14.30
|
|
|
25,750
|
|
$
|
14.30
|
|
|
2,933,232
|
|
7.50
|
|
$
|
3.82
|
|
|
408,042
|
|
$
|
5.07
|
|
Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Awards
Total share based compensation recognized for restricted stock units and restricted stock awards (“RSUs”), which is included in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations, for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
was
$5.4 million
and
$3.6 million
, respectively.
The following table summarizes our RSUs activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Number of
RSUs
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
|
Number of
RSUs
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
Outstanding, beginning of year
|
3,363,946
|
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
|
2,167,212
|
|
|
$
|
4.24
|
|
Granted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs
|
2,001,642
|
|
|
$
|
4.35
|
|
|
789,167
|
|
|
$
|
2.38
|
|
Performance-based restricted stock units (1)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
1,552,001
|
|
|
$
|
2.35
|
|
Total Granted
|
2,001,642
|
|
|
$
|
4.35
|
|
|
2,341,168
|
|
|
$
|
2.36
|
|
Canceled (2)
|
(1,914,319
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
|
(598,650
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.75
|
|
Vested
|
(713,916
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.61
|
|
|
(545,784
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.59
|
|
Outstanding, end of year (3)
|
2,737,353
|
|
|
$
|
3.83
|
|
|
3,363,946
|
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes the maximum number of shares that could have vested from the performance-based restricted stock units (“PBRSUs”) granted in May 2016.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes shares net-settled to cover statutory employee taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock awards, which increased treasury shares by
103 thousand
and
76 thousand
in the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
535 thousand
RSUs granted to a former employee. For additional information, please see Note
22
.
|
As of
December 31, 2017
, there was
$6.9 million
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock units granted under the Plans, including
$1.2 million
related to the RSUs granted to a former employee (see Note
22
). As of
December 31, 2017
, that cost was expected to be recognized over the weighted-average contractual life of the RSUs of
1.6 years
.
Other
As of
December 31, 2017
, we have an outstanding Warrant held by PEAK6 Investments to purchase an aggregate of
1.5 million
shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$2.50
per share, for which we received
$2.2 million
in cash from PEAK6 Investments in the year ended
December 31, 2017
in connection with the New Credit Agreement. For additional information, please see Note
15
.
In addition to the stock options and RSUs, we determined the majority of the earn-out provisions in the business we acquired in March 2015 from Habits at Work to be share based compensation expense. We sold the Habits at Work business in June 2017. In the year ended
December 31, 2017
, we reduced share based compensation expense by
$57 thousand
due to actual Habits at Work performance being lower than forecasted. In the year ended
December 31, 2016
, we recorded share based compensation expense of
$1.1 million
. Due to the sale of the Habits at Work business, there is no remaining unrecognized compensation expense.
19
. Major Clients
As discussed in Notes 1 and 2, we provide credit and personal information and identity theft protection services to consumers through relationships with our financial institution clients. Revenue from subscribers obtained through Bank of America, our largest
financial institution client, was
44%
and
46%
of consolidated net revenue in each of the years ending
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively. Accounts receivable related to this client totaled
$4.8 million
and
$5.2 million
as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively.
20
. Segment and Geographic Information
We have ongoing operations in
two
segments: 1) Personal Information Services and 2) Insurance and Other Consumer Services. In January 2017 we sold the business comprising our Bail Bonds Industry Solutions segment, and in July 2017 we sold the business comprising our Pet Health Monitoring segment. For additional information, please see Note
4
. Corporate headquarter office transactions including, but not limited to, payroll, share based compensation and other expenses related to our Chairman and non-employee Board of Directors are reported in our Corporate business unit.
Our Personal Information Services segment offers identity theft and privacy protection as well as credit monitoring services for consumers to understand, monitor, manage and protect their personal information and privacy. Our Insurance and Other Consumer Services segment includes our insurance and other membership products and services.
The following tables set forth segment information for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal
Information
Services (1)
|
|
Insurance
and Other
Consumer
Services (1)
|
|
Bail Bonds
Industry
Solutions
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$
|
153,151
|
|
|
$
|
6,287
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
159,620
|
|
Depreciation
|
5,385
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,485
|
|
Amortization
|
152
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
152
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
(4,179
|
)
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
(7,787
|
)
|
|
(10,079
|
)
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
(7,805
|
)
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
(7,787
|
)
|
|
(13,705
|
)
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$
|
163,702
|
|
|
$
|
9,817
|
|
|
$
|
2,073
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
175,592
|
|
Depreciation
|
4,452
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
4,763
|
|
Amortization
|
187
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
513
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
14,448
|
|
|
(909
|
)
|
|
(1,849
|
)
|
|
(12,201
|
)
|
|
(511
|
)
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
11,766
|
|
|
(909
|
)
|
|
(1,849
|
)
|
|
(12,372
|
)
|
|
(3,364
|
)
|
|
|
(1)
|
Beginning in September 2016, our Habits at Work business was reclassified from our Insurance and Other Consumer Services segment to our Personal Information Services segment due to a change in business strategy. We concluded that the impact to our consolidated financial statements was not material, and therefore we have not recast our segment disclosures for any periods prior to September 2016.
|
In conjunction with our singular refocus on our identity and privacy protection services, we changed our policy of allocating general and administrative expenses from our Corporate business unit into our other segments, which resulted in a change in our measurement of segment profit and loss. Beginning in 2017, we directly charge our Personal Information Services segment for the majority of general and administrative expenses including executive, legal, human resources, finance and internal audit expenses. We have elected not to recast our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2016 the change in measurement would have had the approximate effects of a
$9.1 million
decrease in income from operations in our Personal Information Services segment, a
$8.1 million
decrease in loss from operations in our Corporate business unit and insignificant changes in our other segments.
The following table sets forth segment information as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Information Services
|
$
|
11,017
|
|
|
$
|
35,517
|
|
|
$
|
10,412
|
|
|
$
|
37,629
|
|
Insurance and Other Consumer Services
|
23
|
|
|
10,159
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
11,092
|
|
Bail Bonds Industry Solutions
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
137
|
|
Corporate
|
—
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
5,013
|
|
Subtotal
|
11,040
|
|
|
46,479
|
|
|
10,858
|
|
|
53,871
|
|
Adjustment for assets of discontinued operations and assets held for sale
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
471
|
|
Consolidated
|
$
|
11,040
|
|
|
$
|
46,479
|
|
|
$
|
10,611
|
|
|
$
|
54,342
|
|
For additional information on assets of discontinued operations and assets held for sale, please see Note
4
.
We generated revenue in the following geographic areas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
Canada
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2017
|
$
|
146,524
|
|
|
$
|
13,096
|
|
|
$
|
159,620
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2016
|
$
|
163,104
|
|
|
$
|
12,488
|
|
|
$
|
175,592
|
|
21
. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
Year ended December 31, 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$
|
40,449
|
|
|
$
|
39,935
|
|
|
$
|
39,248
|
|
|
$
|
39,988
|
|
As reported: (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
(3,691
|
)
|
|
(3,318
|
)
|
|
(2,659
|
)
|
|
N/A
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
(4,250
|
)
|
|
(5,343
|
)
|
|
(3,363
|
)
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
(4,802
|
)
|
|
(6,182
|
)
|
|
(4,399
|
)
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share, basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
N/A
|
|
As revised: (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
(3,691
|
)
|
|
(5,740
|
)
|
|
(2,256
|
)
|
|
1,608
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
(4,250
|
)
|
|
(7,765
|
)
|
|
(2,960
|
)
|
|
1,270
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
(4,802
|
)
|
|
(8,604
|
)
|
|
(3,995
|
)
|
|
3,077
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share, basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$
|
45,633
|
|
|
$
|
44,732
|
|
|
$
|
43,027
|
|
|
$
|
42,200
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
962
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
(1,321
|
)
|
|
(419
|
)
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
630
|
|
|
(668
|
)
|
|
(2,176
|
)
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
Net loss
|
(4,266
|
)
|
|
(5,307
|
)
|
|
(8,108
|
)
|
|
(12,788
|
)
|
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
|
|
(1)
|
The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 have been updated to reflect an adjustment to our share based compensation expense. The change in share based compensation from the amount as reported to the amount as revised was
$2.4 million
and
$(403) thousand
for the quarters ended June 30 and September 30, 2017, respectively. These changes are reflected in the loss from operations, loss from continuing operations before income taxes, net loss and net loss per common share, basic
|
and diluted figures above. Additionally, loss from operations for the quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 2017 and 2016, have been recast to show the effects of our discontinued operations. For additional information, please see Note
4
.
22
. Subsequent Events
As announced on February 2, 2018, Johan J. Roets ceased serving as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective January 29, 2018. Effective February 22, 2018, the Company terminated the employment of Mr. Roets for “cause.” On March 22, 2018, Mr. Roets filed a civil Complaint against the Company in the Circuit Court of Fairfax County Virginia. The Complaint alleges that the Company’s termination of Mr. Roets’ employment on February 22, 2018 violated his Employment Agreement and seeks monetary damages from the Company. The Company believes that this litigation is without merit and intends to vigorously defend the claims set forth therein. The Company’s Board of Directors has appointed Michael R. Stanfield, the Chairman and Founder of the Company, as the Company’s Executive Chairman and President, effective January 29, 2018, pursuant to which he has assumed the duties as the principal executive officer of the Company. Mr. Stanfield co-founded the predecessor to the Company in 1996 and has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors since that time, and was previously the Chief Executive Officer until January 2017.
Effective February 20, 2018, the Company promoted Melba Amissi to Chief Operating Officer. For additional information, please see "—Executive Officers of the Registrant" under Part I of this report.
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses
|
|
Deductions from Allowance
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts deducted from accounts receivable in the balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for deferred tax assets not expected to be realized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
19,813
|
|
|
16,624
|
|
|
(5,691
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,746
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
30,746
|
|
|
(4,304
|
)
|
|
(2,728
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for estimated fair value of Bail Bonds Industry Solutions Segment's assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
744
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
744
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(744
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for unamortized debt discount and debt issuance costs deducted from long-term debt in the balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
1,990
|
|
|
(796
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,194
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
1,194
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
(1,342
|
)
|
|
$
|
764
|
|