Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
x
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company
o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Emerging Growth Company
o
|
|
Item
|
|
Page
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Market for the Registrant's Securities, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
||
|
|||
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of the Account's Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Form 10-K Summary
|
||
•
|
RAs and GRAs (Retirement Annuities and Group Retirement Annuities)
|
•
|
SRAs (Supplemental Retirement Annuities)
|
•
|
GSRAs (Group Supplemental Retirement Annuities)
|
•
|
Retirement Choice and Retirement Choice Plus Annuities
|
•
|
GAs (Group Annuities) and Institutionally Owned GSRAs
|
•
|
Traditional and Roth IRAs (Individual Retirement Annuities) including SEP IRAs (Simplified Employee Pension Plans)
|
•
|
Keoghs
|
•
|
ATRAs (After-Tax Retirement Annuities)
|
•
|
Real Estate Account Accumulation Contract
|
•
|
Direct ownership interests in real estate;
|
•
|
Direct ownership of real estate through interests in joint ventures;
|
•
|
Indirect interests in real estate through real estate-related securities, such as:
|
•
|
public and/or privately placed registered and unregistered equity investments in real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), which investments may consist of registered or unregistered common or preferred stock interests;
|
•
|
real estate limited partnerships and limited liability companies;
|
•
|
investments in equity or debt securities of companies whose operations involve real estate (i.e., that primarily own or manage real estate) which may not be REITs; and
|
•
|
conventional commercial mortgage loans, participating mortgage loans, secured domestic and foreign (including U.K.) mezzanine loans, subordinated loans and collateralized mortgage obligations, including commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) and other similar investments.
|
•
|
Short-term government related instruments, including U.S. Treasury bills;
|
•
|
Intermediate-term or long-term government related instruments, such as securities issued by U.S. Government agencies, U.S. States or municipalities or U.S. Government-sponsored entities;
|
•
|
Short-term non-government related instruments, such as money market instruments and commercial paper;
|
•
|
Intermediate-term or long-term non-government related instruments, such as corporate debt securities or asset-backed securities (“ABS”); and
|
•
|
Stock of companies that do not primarily own or manage real estate.
|
•
|
placing new debt on properties;
|
•
|
refinancing outstanding debt;
|
•
|
assuming debt on the Account’s properties;
|
•
|
extending the maturity date of outstanding debt; or
|
•
|
an unsecured line of credit or credit facility.
|
•
|
from the Account to a College Retirement Equities Fund ("CREF") investment account, a TIAA Access variable account (if available), TIAA’s Traditional Annuity or a mutual fund (including TIAA-CREF affiliated mutual funds) or other options available under the plan;
|
•
|
to the Account from a CREF investment account, a TIAA Access variable account (if available), TIAA’s Traditional Annuity (transfers from TIAA’s Traditional Annuity under RA, GRA or Retirement Choice contracts are subject to restrictions), a TIAA-CREF affiliated mutual fund or from other companies/ plans;
|
•
|
by withdrawing cash; and/or
|
•
|
by setting up a program of automatic withdrawals or transfers.
|
•
|
reviewing and approving the Account’s investment guidelines and monitoring whether the Account’s investments comply with those guidelines;
|
•
|
reviewing and approving valuation procedures for the Account’s properties;
|
•
|
approving adjustments to any property valuations that change the value of the property or the Account as a whole above or below certain prescribed levels, or that are made within three months of the annual independent appraisal;
|
•
|
reviewing and approving how the Account values accumulation and annuity units;
|
•
|
approving the appointment of all independent appraisers;
|
•
|
reviewing the purchase and sale of units by TIAA to ensure that the Account uses the correct unit values; and
|
•
|
requiring appraisals besides those normally conducted, if the independent fiduciary believes that any of the properties have changed materially, or that an additional appraisal is necessary to ensure the Account has correctly valued a property.
|
•
|
establishing the percentage of total accumulation units that TIAA’s ownership should not exceed (the “trigger point”) and creating a method for changing the trigger point;
|
•
|
approving any adjustment of TIAA’s ownership interest in the Account and, in its discretion, requiring an adjustment if TIAA’s ownership of liquidity units reaches the trigger point; and
|
•
|
once the trigger point has been reached, participating in any program to reduce TIAA’s ownership in the Account by utilizing cash flow or liquid investments in the Account, or by utilizing the proceeds from asset sales. If the independent fiduciary were to determine that TIAA’s ownership should be reduced following the trigger point, its role in participating in any asset sales program would include (i) participating in the selection of properties for sale, (ii) providing sales guidelines, and (iii) approving those sales if, in the independent fiduciary’s opinion, such sales are desirable to reduce TIAA’s ownership of liquidity units.
|
•
|
Adverse Global and Domestic Economic Conditions.
The economic conditions in the markets where the Account’s properties are located may be adversely impacted by factors which include:
|
•
|
adverse domestic or global economic conditions, particularly in the event of a deep recession which results in significant employment losses across many sectors of the economy and reduced levels of consumer spending;
|
•
|
a weak market for real estate generally and/or in specific locations where the Account may own property;
|
•
|
business closings, industry or sector slowdowns, employment losses and related factors;
|
•
|
the availability of financing (both for the Account and potential purchasers of the Account’s properties);
|
•
|
an oversupply of, or a reduced demand for, certain types of real estate properties;
|
•
|
natural disasters (including hurricanes and tsunamis), rising sea levels due to global climate warming or otherwise, flooding and other significant and severe weather-related events;
|
•
|
terrorist attacks and/or other man-made events; and
|
•
|
decline in population or shifting demographics.
|
•
|
A property may be unable to attract new tenants or retain existing tenants. This situation could be exacerbated if a concentration of lease expirations occurred during any one time period or multiple tenants exercise early termination at the same time.
|
•
|
The financial condition of our tenants may be adversely impacted, particularly in a prolonged economic downturn. The Account could lose revenue if tenants do not pay rent when contractually obligated, request some form of rent relief and/or default under a lease at one of the Account’s properties. Such a default could occur if a tenant declared bankruptcy, suffered from a lack of liquidity, failed to continue to operate its business or for other reasons. In the event of any such default, we may experience a delay in, or an inability to effect, the enforcement of our rights against that tenant, particularly if that tenant filed for bankruptcy protection. Further, any disputes with tenants could involve costly and time consuming litigation.
|
•
|
In the event a tenant vacates its space in one of the Account’s properties, whether as a result of a default, the expiration of the lease term, rejection of the lease in bankruptcy or otherwise, given current market conditions, we may not be able to re-lease the vacant space either (i) for as much as the rent payable under the previous lease or (ii) at all. Also, we may not be able to re-lease such space without incurring substantial expenditures for tenant improvements and other lease-up related costs, while still being obligated for any mortgage payments, real estate taxes and other expenditures related to the property. In some instances, the Account’s properties may be specifically suited to and/or outfitted for the particular needs of a certain tenant based on the type of business the tenant operates. The Account may have difficulty obtaining a new tenant for any vacant space in its properties, particularly if the current structure of the developed property (e.g., floor plan or otherwise) limits the types of businesses that can use the space without major renovation, which may require the Account to incur substantial expense in re-planning the space. Also, upon expiration of a lease, the space preferences of the Account’s major tenants may no longer align with the space they previously rented, which could cause those tenants to not renew their lease, or may require the Account to expend significant sums to reconfigure the space to their needs.
|
•
|
The Account owns and operates retail properties, which, in addition to the risks listed above, are subject to specific risks, including the insolvency and/or closing of an anchor tenant for certain properties. Many times, anchor tenants will be “big box” stores and other large retailers that can be particularly adversely impacted by a global recession, competition from online retailers and reduced consumer spending generally. Factors that can impact the level of consumer spending include increases in fuel and energy costs, residential and commercial real estate and mortgage conditions, labor and healthcare costs, access to credit, consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors. Under certain circumstances, co-tenancy clauses in tenants’ leases may allow certain tenants in a retail property to terminate their leases or reduce or withhold rental payments when overall occupancy at the property falls below certain minimum levels. The insolvency and/or closing of an anchor tenant may also cause such tenants to terminate their leases, or to fail to renew their leases at expiration.
|
•
|
The sale price of an Account property might differ, perhaps significantly, from its estimated or appraised value, leading to losses or reduced profits to the Account.
|
•
|
The Account might not be able to sell a property at a particular time for a price which management believes represents its fair or full value. This illiquidity may result from the cyclical nature of real estate, general economic conditions impacting the location of the property, disruption in the credit markets or the availability of financing on favorable terms or at all, and the supply of and demand for available tenant space, among other reasons. This might make it difficult to raise cash quickly which could impair the Account’s liquidity position (particularly
|
•
|
The Account may need to provide financing to a purchaser if no cash buyers are available, or if buyers are unable to receive financing on terms enabling them to consummate the purchase. Such seller financing introduces a risk that the counterparty may not perform its obligations to repay the amounts borrowed from the Account to complete the purchase.
|
•
|
For any particular property, the Account may be required to make expenditures for improvements to, or to correct defects in, the property before the Account is able to market and/or sell the property.
|
•
|
Interests in real estate limited partnerships tend to be, in particular, illiquid and the Account may be unable to dispose of such investments at opportune times.
|
•
|
Seller Indemnities.
When the Account sells property, it is often required to provide some amount of indemnity for loss to the buyer. While the Account takes steps to try to mitigate the impact of the indemnities, such indemnities could negatively impact the sale price or result in claims by the buyer for indemnity in the future, which could increase the Account’s expenses and thereby reduce the return on investment.
|
•
|
General Economic Conditions.
General economic conditions, dislocations in the capital or credit markets generally or the market conditions then in effect in the real estate finance industry, may hinder the Account’s ability to obtain financing or refinancing for its property investments on favorable terms or at all, regardless of the quality of the Account’s property for which financing or refinancing is sought. Such unfavorable terms might include high interest rates, increased fees and costs and restrictive covenants applicable to the Account’s operation of the property. Longer term disruptions in the capital and credit markets as a result of uncertainty, changing or increased regulation, reduced alternatives, rising interest rates or failures of significant financial institutions could adversely affect our access to financing necessary to make profitable real estate investments. Our failure to obtain financing or refinancing on favorable terms due to the current state of the credit markets or otherwise could have an adverse impact on the returns of the Account. Also, the Account’s ability to continue to secure financing may be impaired if negative marketplace effects, such as those which followed from the worldwide economic slowdown following the 2008-2011 financial crisis or the subsequent sovereign debt and banking difficulties experienced in parts of the Eurozone, were to occur. Such marketplace effects could result in tighter lending standards instituted by banks and financial institutions, the reduced availability of credit facilities and project finance facilities from banks and the fall of consumer and/or business confidence.
|
•
|
Default Risk.
The property or group of encumbered properties may not generate sufficient cash flow to support the debt service on the mortgage loan. The property may also fail to meet certain financial or operating covenants contained in the loan documents and/or the property may have negative equity (i.e., the loan balance exceeds the value of the property) or inadequate equity. In addition, income from properties or investments or any other source of income for the Account may not generate sufficient cash flow to support the debt service on a line of credit or credit facility. In any of these circumstances, we (or a joint venture in which we invest) may default on the loan, including due to the failure to make required debt service payments when due. If a loan is in default, the Account or the venture may determine that it is not economically desirable and/or in the best interests of the Account to continue to make payments on the loan (including accessing other sources of funds to support debt service on the loan), and/or the Account or venture may not be able to otherwise remedy such default on commercially reasonable terms or at all. In either case, the lender then could accelerate the outstanding amount due on the loan and/or foreclose on the underlying property, in which case the Account could lose the value of its investment in the foreclosed property. Further, any such default or acceleration could trigger a default under loan agreements in respect of other Account properties pledged as security for the defaulted loan or other loans. Finally, any such default could subject the Account to the costs of litigation, increase the Account’s borrowing costs, or result in less favorable terms, with respect to financing future properties or entering into future lines of credit or credit facilities.
|
•
|
Balloon Maturities.
If the Account obtains a mortgage loan that involves a balloon payment, there is a risk that the Account will not be able to make the lump sum principal payment due under the loan at the end of the loan term, or otherwise obtain adequate refinancing on terms commercially acceptable to the Account or at all. The Account then may be forced to sell the property or other properties under unfavorable market conditions, restructure the loan on terms not advantageous to the Account, or default on its mortgage, resulting in the lender exercising its remedies, which may include repossession of the property, and the Account could lose the value of its investment in that property.
|
•
|
Variable Interest Rate Risk.
If the Account obtains variable-rate loans, the Account’s returns may be volatile when interest rates are volatile. Further, to the extent that the Account takes out fixed-rate loans and interest rates subsequently decline, this may cause the Account to pay interest at abovemarket rates for a significant period of time. Any interest rate hedging activities the Account engages in to mitigate this risk may not fully protect the Account from the impact of interest rate volatility.
|
•
|
Variable Rate Demand Obligation (“VRDO”) Risk.
To the extent the Account obtains financing pursuant to a variable rate demand obligation subject to periodic remarketing or similar mechanisms, the Account or the joint ventures in which it invests could face higher borrowing costs if the remarketing results in a higher prevailing interest rate. In addition, the terms of such variable rate obligations may allow the remarketing agent to cause the Account or venture to repay the loan on demand in the event insufficient market demand for such loans is present.
|
•
|
Valuation Risk.
The market valuation of mortgage loans payable could have an adverse impact on the Account’s performance. Valuations of mortgage loans payable are generally based on the amount at which the liability could be transferred in a current transaction, exclusive of transaction costs, and such valuations are subject to a number of assumptions and factors with respect to the loan and the underlying property, a change in any of which could cause the value of a mortgage loan to fluctuate.
|
•
|
The co-venturer may have interests or goals inconsistent with those of the Account, including during times when a co-venturer may be experiencing financial difficulty. For example:
|
•
|
a co-venturer may desire a higher current income return on a particular investment than does the Account (which may be motivated by a longer-term investment horizon or exit strategy), or vice versa, which could cause difficulty in managing a particular asset;
|
•
|
a co-venturer may desire to maximize or minimize leverage in the venture, which may be at odds with the Account’s strategy;
|
•
|
a co-venturer may be more or less likely than the Account to agree to modify the terms of significant agreements (including loan agreements) binding the venture, or may significantly delay in reaching a determination whether to do so, each of which may frustrate the business objectives of the Account and/or lead to a default under a loan secured by a property owned by the venture; or
|
•
|
for reasons related to its own business strategy, a co-venturer may have different concentration standards as to its investments (geographically, by sector, or by tenant), which might frustrate the execution of the business plan for the joint venture.
|
•
|
The co-venturer may be unable to fulfill its obligations (such as to fund its pro rata share of committed capital, expenditures or guarantee obligations of the venture) during the term of such agreement or may become insolvent or bankrupt, any of which could expose the Account to greater liabilities than expected and frustrate the investment objective of the venture.
|
•
|
If a co-venturer doesn’t follow the Account’s instructions or adhere to the Account’s policies, the jointly owned properties, and consequently the Account, might be exposed to greater liabilities than expected.
|
•
|
The Account may have limited rights with respect to the underlying property pursuant to the terms of the joint venture, including the right to operate, manage or dispose of a property, and a co-venturer could have approval rights over the marketing or the ultimate sale of the underlying property.
|
•
|
The terms of the Account’s ventures often provide for complicated agreements which can impede our ability to direct the sale of the property owned by the venture at times the Account views most favorable. One such agreement is a buy-sell right, which may force us to make a decision (either to buy our co-venturer’s interest or sell our interest to our co-venturer) at inopportune times.
|
•
|
A co-venturer can make it harder for the Account to transfer its equity interest in the venture to a third party, which could adversely impact the valuation of the Account’s interest in the venture.
|
•
|
To the extent the Account serves as the general partner or managing member in a venture, it may owe certain contractual or other duties to the co-venturer, including fiduciary duties, which may present perceived or actual conflicts of interest in the management of the underlying assets. Such an arrangement could also subject the Account to liability to third parties in the performance of its duties as a general partner or managing member.
|
•
|
There may be delays or unexpected increases in the cost of property development, redevelopment and construction due to strikes, bad weather, material shortages, increases in material and labor costs or other events.
|
•
|
There are risks associated with potential underperformance or non-performance by, and/or solvency of a contractor we select or other third party vendors involved in developing or redeveloping the property.
|
•
|
If the Account were viewed as developing or redeveloping underperforming properties, suffering losses on our investments, or defaulting on any loans on our properties, our reputation could be damaged. Damage to our reputation could make it more difficult to successfully develop or acquire properties in the future and to continue to grow and expand our relationships with our lenders, venture partners and tenants.
|
•
|
Because external factors may have changed from when the project was originally conceived (e.g., slower growth in the local economy, higher interest rates, overbuilding in the area, or changes in the regulatory and permitting environment), the property may not attract tenants on the schedule we originally planned and/or may not operate at the income and expense levels first projected.
|
•
|
The value of foreign investments or rental income can increase or decrease due to changes or fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, imposition of currency exchange control or market control regulations, possible expropriation or confiscatory taxation, political, social, diplomatic and economic developments and foreign regulations. The Account translates into U.S. dollars purchases and sales of securities, income receipts and expense payments made in foreign currencies at the exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of the transactions. The effect of any changes in currency exchange rates on foreign debt investments and mortgage loans payable is included in the Account’s net realized and unrealized gains and losses. As such, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, even if hedged, may impair or reduce the Account’s returns and result in poorer
|
•
|
The Account may, but is not required to, hedge its exposure to changes in currency rates, which could involve extra costs. Further, any hedging activities might not be successful. Such hedges may also be subject to valuation changes. In addition, a lender to a foreign property owned by the Account could require the Account to compensate it for its loss associated with such lender’s hedging activities.
|
•
|
Non-U.S. jurisdictions may impose withholding taxes on the Account as a result of its investment activity in that jurisdiction. TIAA may be eligible for a foreign tax credit in respect of such tax paid by the Account and such credit (if available to TIAA) would be reimbursed to the Account. However, there may be circumstances where TIAA is unable to receive some or all of the benefit of a foreign tax credit and the Account would thus not receive reimbursement, which could harm the value of the Account’s units.
|
•
|
Foreign real estate markets may have different liquidity and volatility attributes than U.S. markets.
|
•
|
The regulatory environment in non-U.S. jurisdictions may disfavor owners and operators of real estate investment properties, resulting in less predictable and/or economically harmful outcomes if the Account were to face a significant dispute with a tenant or with a regulator itself.
|
•
|
The Account may be subject to increased risk of regulatory scrutiny pursuant to U.S. federal statutes, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which, among other things, requires robust compliance and oversight programs to help prevent violations. The costs associated with maintaining such programs, in addition to costs associated with a potential regulatory inquiry, could impair the Account’s returns and divert management’s attention from other Account activities.
|
•
|
It may be more difficult to obtain and collect a judgment on foreign investments than on domestic investments, and the costs associated with contesting claims relating to foreign investments may exceed those costs associated with a similar claim on domestic investments.
|
•
|
We may invest from time to time in securities issued by (i) entities domiciled in foreign countries, (ii) domestic affiliates of such entities and/or (iii) foreign domiciled affiliates of domestic entities. Such investments could be subject to the risks associated with investments subject to foreign regulation, including political unrest or the seizure, expropriation, repatriation or nationalization of the issuer’s assets. These events could depress the value of such securities and/or make such securities harder to sell on favorable terms, if at all.
|
•
|
The borrower may default on the loan, requiring that the Account foreclose on the underlying property to protect the value of its mortgage loan. Since its mortgage loans are usually non-recourse, the Account must rely solely on the value of a property for its security. In addition, there is a risk of delay in exercising any contractual remedies due to actions of the borrower, including, without limitation, bankruptcy or insolvency of the borrower.
|
•
|
The larger the mortgage loan compared to the value of the property securing it, the greater the loan’s risk. Upon default, the Account may not be able to sell the property for its estimated or appraised value. Also, certain liens on the property, such as mechanic’s or tax liens, may have priority over the Account’s security interest.
|
•
|
A deterioration in the financial condition of tenants, which could be caused by general or local economic conditions or other factors beyond the control of the Account, or the bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant, may adversely affect the income of a property, which could increase the likelihood that the borrower will default under its obligations.
|
•
|
The borrower may be unable to make a lump sum principal payment due under a mortgage loan at the end of the loan term, unless it can refinance the mortgage loan with another lender.
|
•
|
If interest rates are volatile during the loan period, the Account’s variable rate mortgage loans could have volatile yields. Further, to the extent the Account makes mortgage loans with fixed interest rates, it may receive lower yields than that which is then available in the market if interest rates rise generally.
|
•
|
The participation feature, in tying the Account’s returns to the performance of the underlying asset, might generate insufficient returns to make up for the higher interest rate the loan would have obtained without the participation feature.
|
•
|
In very limited circumstances, a court may characterize the Account’s participation interest as a partnership or joint venture with the borrower and the Account could lose the priority of its security interest or become liable for the borrower’s debts.
|
Property
|
Location
|
Ownership Percentage
|
Year
Built
|
Year
Purchased
|
Rentable
Area
(Sq. ft.)
(1)
|
Percent
Leased
|
Annual Avg.
Base Rent
Per Leased
Sq. Ft.
(2)
|
Fair
Value
(3)
(millions)
|
|
||||
OFFICE PROPERTIES
|
|||||||||||||
1001 Pennsylvania Ave
|
Washington, D.C.
|
100.00%
|
1987
|
2004
|
780,294
|
78.7%
|
$
|
47.75
|
|
$
|
782.8
|
|
(4)
|
Fourth & Madison
|
Seattle, WA
|
100.00%
|
2002
|
2004
|
845,533
|
88.0%
|
30.38
|
|
580.0
|
|
(4)
|
||
99 High Street
|
Boston, MA
|
100.00%
|
1971
|
2005
|
730,168
|
92.0%
|
41.92
|
|
506.4
|
|
(4)
|
||
780 Third Avenue
|
New York, NY
|
100.00%
|
1984
|
1999
|
492,210
|
81.4%
|
56.68
|
|
418.7
|
|
(4)
|
||
701 Brickell Avenue
|
Miami, FL
|
100.00%
|
1986
|
2002
|
677,667
|
92.8%
|
29.80
|
|
394.3
|
|
(4)
|
||
Colorado Center
|
Santa Monica, CA
|
50.00%
|
1984
|
2004
|
1,117,647
|
95.7%
|
63.53
|
|
376.2
|
|
(5)
|
||
Lincoln Centre
|
Dallas, TX
|
100.00%
|
1984
|
2005
|
1,625,465
|
83.1%
|
24.08
|
|
372.6
|
|
|
||
55 Second Street
|
San Francisco, CA
|
100.00%
|
2002
|
2014
|
379,328
|
92.4%
|
45.66
|
|
368.2
|
|
(4)
|
||
Four Oaks Place
|
Houston, TX
|
51.00%
|
1983, 2016
|
2012
|
2,343,196
|
82.1%
|
25.78
|
|
344.6
|
|
(5)
|
||
1900 K Street, NW
|
Washington, D.C.
|
100.00%
|
1996
|
2004
|
345,781
|
94.4%
|
52.17
|
|
342.1
|
|
(4)
|
||
21 Penn Plaza
|
New York, NY
|
100.00%
|
1931, 2012-2014
|
2014
|
374,153
|
91.5%
|
54.36
|
|
317.8
|
|
|
||
Wilshire Rodeo Plaza
|
Beverly Hills, CA
|
100.00%
|
1935, 1984
|
2006
|
255,537
|
81.6%
|
69.01
|
|
312.4
|
|
|
||
Foundry Square II
|
San Francisco, CA
|
50.10%
|
2002
|
2014
|
508,527
|
100.0%
|
68.10
|
|
290.1
|
|
|
||
Fort Point Portfolio
|
Boston, MA
|
100.00%
|
1890-1920, 1986-2010
|
2016
|
406,857
|
90.9%
|
43.73
|
|
247.1
|
|
|
||
One Boston Place
|
Boston, MA
|
50.25%
|
1970
|
2002
|
805,589
|
80.6%
|
47.97
|
|
239.1
|
|
|
||
409 & 499 Illinois Street
|
San Francisco, CA
|
40.00%
|
2008, 2010
|
2015
|
463,985
|
99.0%
|
52.34
|
|
223.9
|
|
|
||
837 Washington Street
|
New York, NY
|
100.00%
|
1938, 2012-2014
|
2015
|
55,497
|
100.0%
|
175.17
|
|
222.0
|
|
|
||
225 Binney Street
|
Cambridge, MA
|
70.00%
|
2013
|
2015
|
305,212
|
100.0%
|
42.93
|
|
220.2
|
|
|
||
1401 H Street, NW
|
Washington, D.C.
|
100.00%
|
1992
|
2006
|
350,515
|
66.5%
|
52.50
|
|
209.5
|
|
(4)
|
||
501 Boylston
|
Boston, MA
|
50.10%
|
1940, 1961
|
2018
|
610,075
|
99.3%
|
50.99
|
|
195.6
|
|
(5)
|
||
88 Kearny Street
|
San Francisco, CA
|
100.00%
|
1986
|
1999
|
227,882
|
89.3%
|
63.55
|
|
189.1
|
|
|
||
Campus Pointe 1
|
San Diego, CA
|
45.00%
|
1980, 2012
|
2016
|
449,759
|
91.9%
|
40.30
|
|
153.7
|
|
|
Property
|
Location
|
Ownership Percentage
|
Year
Built
|
Year
Purchased
|
Rentable
Area
(Sq. ft.)
(1)
|
Percent
Leased
|
Annual Avg.
Base Rent
Per Leased
Sq. Ft.
(2)
|
Fair
Value
(3)
(millions)
|
|
||||
Campus Pointe 2 & 3
|
San Diego, CA
|
45.00%
|
1997, 2016
|
2016, 2017
|
305,006
|
100.0%
|
$
|
37.75
|
|
$
|
132.8
|
|
|
440 Ninth Avenue
|
New York, NY
|
88.52%
|
1927, 1999, 2016
|
2018
|
410,815
|
99.6%
|
40.30
|
|
121.4
|
|
(5)
|
||
Wilton Woods Corporate Campus
|
Wilton, CT
|
100.00%
|
1974, 2001
|
2001
|
531,606
|
79.1%
|
24.78
|
|
121.0
|
|
|
||
Pacific Plaza
|
San Diego, CA
|
100.00%
|
2000, 2002
|
2007
|
217,715
|
54.2%
|
36.92
|
|
116.5
|
|
|
||
The Ellipse at Ballston
|
Arlington, VA
|
100.00%
|
1989
|
2006
|
196,848
|
84.0%
|
39.86
|
|
82.4
|
|
|
||
1500 Owens
|
San Francisco, CA
|
49.90%
|
2009
|
2015
|
158,267
|
100.0%
|
52.11
|
|
78.8
|
|
|
||
Camelback Center
|
Phoenix, AZ
|
100.00%
|
2001
|
2007
|
232,550
|
84.2%
|
20.78
|
|
63.4
|
|
|
||
West Lake North Business Park
|
Westlake Village, CA
|
100.00%
|
2000
|
2004
|
197,366
|
96.8%
|
30.07
|
|
62.6
|
|
|
||
200 Middlefield Road
|
Menlo Park, CA
|
100.00%
|
1967, 2012-2013
|
2014
|
41,933
|
100.0%
|
75.40
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
||
The Hub
|
Long Island City, NY
|
95.00%
|
1924
|
2016
|
304,821
|
39.2%
|
14.46
|
|
59.2
|
|
(5)
|
||
3131 McKinney
|
Dallas, TX
|
100.00%
|
1984
|
2018
|
145,641
|
76.5%
|
25.53
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
||
8270 Greensboro Drive
|
McLean, VA
|
100.00%
|
2000
|
2005
|
158,341
|
84.2%
|
29.55
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
||
30700 Russell Ranch
|
Westlake Village, CA
|
100.00%
|
2000
|
2018
|
136,262
|
84.9%
|
31.12
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
||
817 Broadway
|
New York, NY
|
61.46%
|
1900
|
2016
|
139,410
|
22.9%
|
16.05
|
|
28.0
|
|
(5)
|
||
Campus Pointe 4
|
San Diego, CA
|
45.00%
|
1991, 2015
|
2017
|
44,034
|
—%
|
—
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
||
Subtotal—Office Properties
|
|
|
|
|
86.1%
|
|
$
|
8,375.3
|
|
|
|||
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Ontario Industrial Portfolio
|
Various, CA
|
100.00%
|
1997-1998
|
1998, 2000, 2004
|
3,361,599
|
100.0%
|
$
|
4.89
|
|
$
|
421.8
|
|
|
Dallas Industrial Portfolio
|
Dallas and Coppell, TX
|
100.00%
|
1997-2001
|
2000-2002
|
3,684,941
|
96.7%
|
3.46
|
|
222.3
|
|
|
||
Great West Industrial Portfolio
|
Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, CA
|
100.00%
|
2004-2005
|
2008
|
1,358,925
|
100.0%
|
5.59
|
|
178.5
|
|
|
||
Cerritos Industrial Park
|
Cerritos, CA
|
100.00%
|
1970-1977
|
2012
|
934,213
|
98.4%
|
7.27
|
|
153.1
|
|
|
||
Pinto Business Park
|
Houston, TX
|
100.00%
|
2014, 2015, 2016
|
2015, 2016
|
1,641,141
|
68.5%
|
5.29
|
|
144.9
|
|
|
||
Southern CA RA Industrial Portfolio
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
100.00%
|
1982
|
2004
|
920,078
|
90.7%
|
6.97
|
|
143.4
|
|
|
||
Rainier Corporate Park
|
Fife, WA
|
100.00%
|
1991-1997
|
2003
|
1,104,399
|
94.9%
|
5.49
|
|
141.6
|
|
|
||
Seneca Industrial Park
|
Pembroke Park, FL
|
100.00%
|
1999-2001
|
2007
|
882,182
|
99.9%
|
7.16
|
|
117.5
|
|
|
||
Regal Logistics Campus
|
Seattle, WA
|
100.00%
|
1999-2004
|
2005
|
968,535
|
100.0%
|
3.48
|
|
109.1
|
|
|
||
Oakmont IE West Portfolio
|
Fontana, CA
|
100.00%
|
2014-2015
|
2015
|
709,941
|
100.0%
|
5.30
|
|
103.5
|
|
|
||
South River Road Industrial
|
Cranbury, NJ
|
100.00%
|
1999
|
2001
|
858,957
|
100.0%
|
5.52
|
|
102.5
|
|
|
||
Weston Business Center
|
Weston, FL
|
100.00%
|
1998-1999
|
2011
|
679,918
|
67.0%
|
8.96
|
|
97.8
|
|
|
||
Northern CA RA Industrial Portfolio
|
Oakland, CA
|
100.00%
|
1981
|
2004
|
657,602
|
93.6%
|
6.85
|
|
93.3
|
|
|
||
Shawnee Ridge Industrial Portfolio
|
Atlanta, GA
|
100.00%
|
2000-2005
|
2005
|
1,422,922
|
100.0%
|
3.70
|
|
89.2
|
|
|
||
Chicago Caleast Industrial Portfolio
|
Chicago, IL
|
100.00%
|
1974, 2005
|
2003
|
1,145,152
|
100.0%
|
4.32
|
|
82.8
|
|
|
||
Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Portfolio
|
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
|
100.00%
|
2000-2002
|
2000, 2001, 2002, 2004
|
573,000
|
100.0%
|
12.69
|
|
76.2
|
|
|
||
Northwest Houston Industrial Portfolio
|
Houston, TX
|
100.00%
|
1981
|
2014
|
1,010,912
|
85.4%
|
4.53
|
|
75.6
|
|
|
||
Frontera Industrial Business Park
|
San Diego, CA
|
100.00%
|
1989, 2015
|
2017
|
517,207
|
90.2%
|
6.92
|
|
74.0
|
|
|
||
Ontario Mills Industrial Portfolio
|
Ontario, CA
|
100.00%
|
2014
|
2014
|
435,733
|
100.0%
|
5.39
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
||
Stevenson Point
|
Newark, CA
|
100.00%
|
2000
|
2015
|
312,885
|
100.0%
|
11.14
|
|
61.3
|
|
|
||
Broward Industrial Portfolio
|
Various, FL
|
100.00%
|
Various
|
2017
|
401,368
|
80.6%
|
9.17
|
|
59.1
|
|
|
Property
|
Location
|
Ownership Percentage
|
Year
Built
|
Year
Purchased
|
Rentable
Area
(Sq. ft.)
(1)
|
Percent
Leased
|
Annual Avg.
Base Rent
Per Leased
Sq. Ft.
(2)
|
Fair
Value
(3)
(millions)
|
|
||||
OTHER COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
425 Park Avenue
|
New York, NY
|
100.00%
|
N/A
|
2011
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
$
|
461.0
|
|
|
||
Storage Portfolio II
|
Various, U.S.A.
|
90.00%
|
Various
|
2017
|
2,668,499
|
94.4%
|
11.82
|
120.4
|
|
(5)
|
|||
Storage Portfolio I
|
Various, U.S.A.
|
66.02%
|
1972, 1990
|
2003
|
1,681,524
|
93.5%
|
18.65
|
92.4
|
|
(5)
|
|||
9625 Towne Centre Drive
|
San Diego, CA
|
49.90%
|
N/A
|
2017
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
45.5
|
|
|
|||
Subtotal—Other Commercial Properties
|
|
|
|
|
94.0%
|
|
$
|
719.3
|
|
|
|||
Subtotal—Commercial Properties
|
|
|
|
|
91.5%
|
|
$
|
16,439.9
|
|
|
|||
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Simpson Housing Portfolio
|
Various, U.S.A.
|
80.00%
|
1998-2016
|
2018
|
N/A
|
97.2%
|
N/A
|
$
|
400.1
|
|
(5)
|
||
Palomino Park
|
Highlands Ranch, CO
|
100.00%
|
1996-2001
|
2005
|
N/A
|
91.2%
|
N/A
|
348.0
|
|
(4)
|
|||
The Colorado
|
New York, NY
|
100.00%
|
1987
|
1999
|
N/A
|
94.3%
|
N/A
|
254.9
|
|
(4)
|
|||
The Woodley
|
Washington, D.C.
|
100.00%
|
2014
|
2014
|
N/A
|
95.3%
|
N/A
|
196.0
|
|
|
|||
Stella
|
Marina Del Rey, CA
|
100.00%
|
2013
|
2013
|
N/A
|
94.7%
|
N/A
|
183.7
|
|
|
|||
Mass Court
|
Washington, D.C.
|
100.00%
|
2004
|
2012
|
N/A
|
93.8%
|
N/A
|
166.1
|
|
(4)
|
|||
Houston Apartment Portfolio
|
Houston, TX
|
100.00%
|
1984-2004
|
2006
|
N/A
|
91.8%
|
N/A
|
164.4
|
|
|
|||
BLVD63
|
San Diego, CA
|
100.00%
|
2014
|
2016
|
N/A
|
99.7%
|
N/A
|
164.0
|
|
|
|||
The Louis at 14th
|
Washington, D.C.
|
100.00%
|
2013-2014
|
2014
|
N/A
|
94.4%
|
N/A
|
162.0
|
|
|
|||
Holly Street Village
|
Pasadena, CA
|
100.00%
|
1997
|
2013
|
N/A
|
95.2%
|
N/A
|
152.1
|
|
(4)
|
|||
250 North 10th Street
|
Brooklyn, NY
|
100.00%
|
2014
|
2015
|
N/A
|
91.5%
|
N/A
|
151.0
|
|
|
|||
Larkspur Courts
|
Larkspur, CA
|
100.00%
|
1991
|
1999
|
N/A
|
89.1%
|
N/A
|
146.0
|
|
|
|||
The Legacy at Westwood
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
100.00%
|
2001
|
2002
|
N/A
|
93.0%
|
N/A
|
144.0
|
|
(4)
|
|||
The Manor at Flagler Village
|
Fort Lauderdale, FL
|
100.00%
|
2014
|
2015
|
N/A
|
92.1%
|
N/A
|
137.1
|
|
|
|||
The Palatine
|
Arlington, VA
|
100.00%
|
2008
|
2011
|
N/A
|
95.0%
|
N/A
|
122.0
|
|
(4)
|
|||
MiMA
|
New York, NY
|
70.00%
|
2010
|
2012
|
N/A
|
99.6%
|
N/A
|
118.4
|
|
(5)
|
|||
Union - South Lake Union
|
Seattle, WA
|
100.00%
|
2012
|
2015
|
N/A
|
92.6%
|
N/A
|
114.0
|
|
(4)
|
|||
South Florida Apartment Portfolio
|
Boca Raton and Plantation, FL
|
100.00%
|
1986
|
2001
|
N/A
|
93.3%
|
N/A
|
108.7
|
|
|
|||
Ashford Meadows Apartments
|
Herndon, VA
|
100.00%
|
1998
|
2000
|
N/A
|
93.0%
|
N/A
|
107.1
|
|
(4)
|
|||
Regents Court
|
San Diego, CA
|
100.00%
|
2001
|
2002
|
N/A
|
90.8%
|
N/A
|
104.0
|
|
(4)
|
|||
Casa Palma
|
Coconut Creek, FL
|
100.00%
|
2014
|
2015
|
N/A
|
90.3%
|
N/A
|
102.0
|
|
|
|||
Circa Green Lake
|
Seattle, WA
|
100.00%
|
2009
|
2012
|
N/A
|
87.4%
|
N/A
|
98.2
|
|
(4)
|
|||
803 Corday
|
Naperville, IL
|
100.00%
|
1999
|
2017
|
N/A
|
90.0%
|
N/A
|
94.2
|
|
|
|||
Rancho Del Mar
|
San Clemente, CA
|
100.00%
|
1986
|
2018
|
N/A
|
90.0%
|
N/A
|
92.5
|
|
|
|||
Township Apartments
|
Redwood City, CA
|
100.00%
|
2014
|
2014
|
N/A
|
96.2%
|
N/A
|
90.5
|
|
(4)
|
|||
Oceano at Warner Center
|
Woodland Hills, CA
|
100.00%
|
2012
|
2013
|
N/A
|
92.6%
|
N/A
|
89.3
|
|
|
|||
Fusion 1560
|
St. Petersburg, FL
|
100.00%
|
2011
|
2018
|
N/A
|
92.9%
|
N/A
|
82.0
|
|
(4)
|
|||
Greene Crossing
|
Columbia, SC
|
100.00%
|
2015
|
2016
|
N/A
|
99.4%
|
N/A
|
75.1
|
|
|
|||
The Residences at the Village of Merrick Park
|
Coral Gables, FL
|
100.00%
|
2003
|
2012
|
N/A
|
92.5%
|
N/A
|
72.7
|
|
|
|||
Churchill on the Park
|
Dallas, TX
|
100.00%
|
1999
|
2018
|
N/A
|
86.6%
|
N/A
|
71.3
|
|
|
|||
Biltmore at Midtown
|
Atlanta, GA
|
100.00%
|
2001
|
2018
|
N/A
|
86.6%
|
N/A
|
70.4
|
|
(4)
|
|||
Centric Gateway
|
Charlotte, NC
|
100.00%
|
2017
|
2018
|
N/A
|
70.0%
|
N/A
|
70.0
|
|
|
|||
Ascent at Windward
|
Alpharetta, GA
|
100.00%
|
1998
|
2018
|
N/A
|
91.2%
|
N/A
|
68.4
|
|
(4)
|
|||
Lofts at SoDo
|
Orlando, FL
|
100.00%
|
2009
|
2018
|
N/A
|
93.2%
|
N/A
|
66.7
|
|
(4)
|
Property
|
Location
|
Ownership Percentage
|
Year
Built
|
Year
Purchased
|
Rentable
Area
(Sq. ft.)
(1)
|
Percent
Leased
|
Annual Avg.
Base Rent
Per Leased
Sq. Ft.
(2)
|
Fair
Value
(3)
(millions)
|
|
||||
Prescott Wallingford Apartments
|
Seattle, WA
|
100.00%
|
2012
|
2012
|
N/A
|
95.5%
|
N/A
|
$
|
66.5
|
|
|
||
Carrington Park
|
Plano, TX
|
100.00%
|
1994
|
2018
|
N/A
|
93.1%
|
N/A
|
65.1
|
|
|
|||
The Bridges
|
Minneapolis, MN
|
100.00%
|
2014
|
2017
|
N/A
|
99.7%
|
N/A
|
64.9
|
|
|
|||
5 West
|
Tampa, FL
|
100.00%
|
2009
|
2018
|
N/A
|
89.6%
|
N/A
|
62.2
|
|
|
|||
Allure at Camarillo
|
Camarillo, CA
|
100.00%
|
2003
|
2017
|
N/A
|
71.5%
|
N/A
|
61.8
|
|
|
|||
Cherry Knoll
|
Germantown, MD
|
100.00%
|
1985
|
2018
|
N/A
|
98.3%
|
N/A
|
59.2
|
|
(4)
|
|||
The Maroneal
|
Houston, TX
|
100.00%
|
1998
|
2005
|
N/A
|
92.6%
|
N/A
|
56.1
|
|
|
|||
Westcreek
|
Westlake Village, CA
|
100.00%
|
1988
|
1997
|
N/A
|
96.0%
|
N/A
|
55.0
|
|
|
|||
The Manor Apartments
|
Plantation, FL
|
100.00%
|
2013
|
2014
|
N/A
|
93.9%
|
N/A
|
52.9
|
|
|
|||
Orion on Orpington
|
Orlando, FL
|
100.00%
|
2007
|
2017
|
N/A
|
99.7%
|
N/A
|
49.2
|
|
|
|||
Cliffs at Barton Creek
|
Austin, TX
|
100.00%
|
1994
|
2013
|
N/A
|
91.9%
|
N/A
|
46.7
|
|
|
|||
Aspen Heights
|
Austin, TX
|
97.00%
|
2018
|
2018
|
N/A
|
100.0%
|
N/A
|
42.3
|
|
(5)
|
|||
The Cordelia
|
Portland, OR
|
100.00%
|
2014
|
2015
|
N/A
|
86.7%
|
N/A
|
41.7
|
|
|
|||
The Knoll
|
Minneapolis, MN
|
100.00%
|
2013
|
2017
|
N/A
|
99.6%
|
N/A
|
36.1
|
|
(4)
|
|||
The Ashton
|
Washington, D.C.
|
100.00%
|
2009
|
2015
|
N/A
|
91.8%
|
N/A
|
30.5
|
|
|
|||
Park on Morton
|
Bloomington, IN
|
97.00%
|
2013
|
2018
|
N/A
|
100.0%
|
N/A
|
29.5
|
|
(5)
|
|||
Cabana Beach San Marcos
|
San Marcos, TX
|
97.00%
|
2006, 2016-2017
|
2018
|
N/A
|
100.0%
|
N/A
|
23.0
|
|
(5)
|
|||
The Forum - Sam Houston
|
Huntsville, TX
|
97.00%
|
2011
|
2018
|
N/A
|
100.0%
|
N/A
|
17.6
|
|
(5)
|
|||
Subtotal—Residential Properties
|
|
93.8%
|
|
$
|
5,447.2
|
|
|
||||||
Total—All Properties
|
92.1%
|
|
$
|
21,887.1
|
|
|
(1)
|
The square footage is an approximate measure and is subject to periodic remeasurement.
|
(2)
|
Based on total contractual rent for leases existing as of December 31, 2018. The contractual rent can be either on a gross or net basis, depending on the terms of the leases.
|
(3)
|
Wholly owned properties are represented at fair value and gross of any debt, while joint venture properties are represented at the net equity value.
|
(4)
|
Property is subject to a mortgage. The fair value shown represents the Account's interest gross of debt.
|
(5)
|
The fair value reflects the Account's interest in the joint venture and is net of debt.
|
(6)
|
Fair value shown reflects a retail property wholly-owned by the Account, as well as the Account's 33.33% interest in a joint venture investment.
|
Major Office Tenants
|
|
Occupied Sq. Ft.
|
|
% of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Office Properties
|
|
% of Total Rentable Area of Non-Residential Properties
|
|||
BHP Petroleum (Americas), Inc.
(1)
|
|
1,132,561
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
Crowell & Moring LLP
(2)
|
|
399,471
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Atmos Energy Corporation
(2)
|
|
312,238
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Biogen MA Inc
(1)
|
|
305,212
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Eli Lilly and Company
(1)
|
|
305,006
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Hulu LLC
(1)
|
|
261,823
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Fibrogen Inc
(1)
|
|
238,707
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Bank of New York Mellon
(1)
|
|
226,165
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
McKenna Long and Aldridge LLP
(2)
|
|
199,268
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Edmunds
(1)
|
|
195,594
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Major Industrial Tenants
|
|
Occupied Sq. Ft.
|
|
% of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Industrial Properties
|
|
% of Total Rentable Area of Non-Residential Properties
|
|||
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
(2)
|
|
1,099,112
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Regal West Corporation
(2)
|
|
968,535
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
Restoration Hardware, Inc.
(2)
|
|
886,052
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
Kumho Tire U.S.A. Inc.
(2)
|
|
830,485
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Del Monte Fresh Product, N.A., Inc.
(2)
|
|
689,660
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
R.R Donnelley & Sons Company
(2)
|
|
659,157
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Rheem Sales Company, Inc.
(2)
|
|
656,600
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Global Equipment Company, Inc.
(2)
|
|
647,228
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Campbell Soup Supply Company
(2)
|
|
573,000
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
Meiko America, Inc.
(2)
|
|
557,500
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
Major Retail Tenants
|
|
Occupied Sq. Ft.
|
|
% of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Retail Properties
|
|
% of Total Rentable Area of Non-Residential Properties
|
|||
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
(1)
|
|
614,282
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
Macy's Inc.
(1)
|
|
496,603
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Belk, Inc.
(1)
|
|
372,812
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Kohl's Corporation
(1)
|
|
349,777
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
PetSmart, Inc.
(3)
|
|
332,794
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc
(1)
|
|
330,096
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Best Buy Co., Inc
. (3)
|
|
313,219
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Nordstrom Inc.
(3)
|
|
304,610
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Ross Stores, Inc.
(1)
|
|
298,776
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Bed Bath and Beyond Inc.
(3)
|
|
274,897
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
(1)
|
Tenant occupied space within joint venture investments.
|
(2)
|
Tenant occupied space within wholly-owned investments.
|
(3)
|
Tenant occupied space within wholly-owned and joint venture investments.
|
Year of
Lease Expiration
|
|
Number of
Tenants with
Expiring Leases
|
|
Base Rent
Associated with Such
Leases (millions)
(1)
|
|
Expiring Rent as
a % of
Rental Income
(1)
|
|
Rentable Area
Subject to Expiring
Leases (sq. ft.)
|
|
% of
Total Rentable
Area of Account’s
Office Properties
Represented by
Expiring Leases
|
||||||
2019
|
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
28.7
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
1,289,301
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
2020
|
|
137
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
1,539,330
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
2021
|
|
121
|
|
|
45.9
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
1,995,188
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
2022
|
|
113
|
|
|
81.6
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
1,416,807
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
2023
|
|
84
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
1,292,511
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
2024
|
|
69
|
|
|
45.9
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
1,506,181
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
2025
|
|
55
|
|
|
53.6
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
1,050,046
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
2026
|
|
32
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
1,223,712
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
2027
|
|
18
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
376,768
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
2028
|
|
33
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
1,123,860
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
43
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
1,843,661
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
828
|
|
|
$
|
516.2
|
|
|
31.3
|
%
|
|
14,657,365
|
|
|
84.4
|
%
|
Year of
Lease Expiration
|
|
Number of
Tenants with
Expiring Leases
|
|
Base Rent
Associated with Such
Leases (millions)
(1)
|
|
Expiring Rent as
a % of
Rental Income
(1)
|
|
Rentable Area
Subject to Expiring
Leases (sq. ft.)
|
|
% of
Total Rentable
Area of Account’s
Industrial Properties
Represented by
Expiring Leases
|
||||||
2019
|
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
7.2
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
2,668,080
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
2020
|
|
87
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
6,243,867
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
2021
|
|
89
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
5,936,024
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
2022
|
|
75
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
6,352,736
|
|
|
19.7
|
%
|
|
2023
|
|
54
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
4,312,580
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
2024
|
|
25
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
1,495,055
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
2025
|
|
10
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
567,408
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
2026
|
|
5
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
739,076
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
2027
|
|
7
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
279,668
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
2028
|
|
4
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
292,297
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
3
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
25,476
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
452
|
|
|
$
|
89.1
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
28,912,267
|
|
|
89.8
|
%
|
Year of
Lease Expiration
|
|
Number of
Tenants with
Expiring Leases
|
|
Base Rent
Associated with Such
Leases (millions)
(1)
|
|
Expiring Rent as
a % of
Rental Income
(1)
|
|
Rentable Area
Subject to Expiring
Leases (sq. ft.)
|
|
% of
Total Rentable
Area of Account’s
Retail Properties
Represented by
Expiring Leases
|
||||||
2019
|
|
251
|
|
|
$
|
15.9
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
1,379,435
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
2020
|
|
287
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
1,920,561
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
2021
|
|
281
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
2,050,012
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
2022
|
|
238
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
2,265,522
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
2023
|
|
266
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
1,757,342
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
2024
|
|
158
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
1,221,979
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
2025
|
|
139
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
943,230
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
2026
|
|
102
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
954,474
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
2027
|
|
82
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
601,993
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
2028
|
|
62
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
492,399
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
37
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
1,461,244
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
1,903
|
|
|
$
|
161.4
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
15,048,191
|
|
|
92.9
|
%
|
(1)
|
Includes base rent from wholly-owned properties and properties held through joint ventures.
|
|
Leasing Activity
(sq. ft.)
|
|
|
Vacant space beginning of year
|
5,685,814
|
|
|
Vacant space acquired during the year
|
79,874
|
|
|
Vacant space disposed of during the year
|
(176,247
|
)
|
|
Vacant space placed into service during the year
|
(8,116,911
|
)
|
|
Expiring leases during the year
|
8,415,556
|
|
|
Vacant space end of year
|
5,888,086
|
|
|
Average remaining lease term*
|
46 months
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Location
|
|
Number
Of Units
|
|
Average
Unit Size
(Sq. Ft.)
|
|
Avg. Rent
Per Unit/
Per Month
|
||||
The Colorado
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
175
|
|
|
876
|
|
|
$
|
6,313
|
|
The Legacy at Westwood
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
187
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
5,265
|
|
|
The Woodley
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
212
|
|
|
1,117
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
MiMA
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
500
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
4,547
|
|
|
The Ashton
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
49
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
4,515
|
|
|
250 North 10th Street
|
|
Brooklyn, NY
|
|
234
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
3,644
|
|
|
Township Apartments
|
|
Redwood City, CA
|
|
132
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
3,632
|
|
|
Stella
|
|
Marina Del Rey, CA
|
|
244
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
3,527
|
|
|
The Residences at the Village of Merrick Park
|
|
Coral Gables, FL
|
|
120
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
3,492
|
|
|
Larkspur Courts
|
|
Larkspur, CA
|
|
248
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
|
The Louis at 14th
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
268
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
3,074
|
|
|
Mass Court
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
371
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
The Palatine
|
|
Arlington, VA
|
|
262
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
2,691
|
|
|
Westcreek
|
|
Westlake Village, CA
|
|
126
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
The Manor at Flagler Village
|
|
Fort Lauderdale, FL
|
|
382
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
2,382
|
|
|
Regents Court
|
|
San Diego, CA
|
|
251
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
|
Holly Street Village
|
|
Pasadena, CA
|
|
374
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
|
The Manor Apartments
|
|
Plantation, FL
|
|
197
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
Circa Green Lake
|
|
Seattle, WA
|
|
199
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
Oceano at Warner Center
|
|
Woodland Hills, CA
|
|
244
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
|
Allure at Camarillo
|
|
Camarillo, CA
|
|
165
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
2,227
|
|
|
Union - South Lake Union
|
|
Seattle, WA
|
|
284
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
|
Casa Palma
|
|
Coconut Creek, FL
|
|
350
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
2,022
|
|
|
Simpson Housing Portfolio
(1)
|
|
Various, U.S.A.
|
|
3,827
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
Rancho Del Mar
|
|
San Clemente, CA
|
|
250
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
1,947
|
|
|
Prescott Wallingford Apartments
|
|
Seattle, WA
|
|
154
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
1,928
|
|
|
The Cordelia
|
|
Portland, OR
|
|
135
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
1,838
|
|
|
Palomino Park
(1)
|
|
Highlands Ranch, CO
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
1,804
|
|
|
Houston Apartment Porfolio
(1)
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
877
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
Ashford Meadows Apartments
|
|
Herndon, VA
|
|
440
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
1,713
|
|
|
Biltmore at Midtown
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
276
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
1,651
|
|
|
Centric Gateway
|
|
Charlotte, NC
|
|
297
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
Lofts at SoDo
|
|
Orlando, FL
|
|
308
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
1,630
|
|
|
803 Corday
|
|
Naperville, IL
|
|
440
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
Cliffs at Barton Creek
|
|
Austin, TX
|
|
210
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
|
Fusion 1560
|
|
St. Petersburg, FL
|
|
325
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
The Maroneal
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
309
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
Cherry Knoll
|
|
Germantown, MD
|
|
300
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
South Florida Apartment Portfolio
(1)
|
|
Boca Raton and Plantation, FL
|
|
550
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
Ascent at Windward
|
|
Alpharetta, GA
|
|
328
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
5 West
|
|
Tampa, FL
|
|
318
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
BLVD 63
(2)
|
|
San Diego, CA
|
|
330
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
Property
|
|
Location
|
|
Number
Of Units
|
|
Average
Unit Size
(Sq. Ft.)
|
|
Avg. Rent
Per Unit/
Per Month
|
||||
Carrington Park
|
|
Plano, TX
|
|
364
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
$
|
1,326
|
|
Churchill on the Park
|
|
Dallas, TX
|
|
448
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
Aspen Heights
(2)
|
|
Austin, TX
|
|
166
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
Greene Crossing
(2)
|
|
Columbia, SC
|
|
727
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
Park on Morton
(2)
|
|
Bloomington, IN
|
|
473
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
The Forum - Sam Houston
(2)
|
|
Huntsville, TX
|
|
294
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
Orion on Orpington
(2)
|
|
Orlando, FL
|
|
624
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
Cabana Beach San Marcos
(2)
|
|
San Marcos, TX
|
|
276
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
The Bridges
(2)
|
|
Minneapolis, MN
|
|
720
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
The Knoll
(2)
|
|
Minneapolis, MN
|
|
452
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
442
|
|
(1)
|
Represents a portfolio containing multiple properties.
|
(2)
|
Investment is a student housing asset. Units are rented per bedroom, and multiple bedrooms can exist in one apartment. Average rent per month in the table above is reflective of average rent per bedroom.
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||||||||
Investment income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Real estate income, net
|
|
$
|
561.8
|
|
|
$
|
582.0
|
|
|
$
|
546.4
|
|
|
$
|
486.2
|
|
|
$
|
457.0
|
|
Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships
|
|
204.7
|
|
|
214.1
|
|
|
161.8
|
|
|
140.1
|
|
|
148.1
|
|
|||||
Dividends and interest
|
|
171.2
|
|
|
80.4
|
|
|
58.9
|
|
|
57.6
|
|
|
47.7
|
|
|||||
Total investment income
|
|
937.7
|
|
|
876.5
|
|
|
767.1
|
|
|
683.9
|
|
|
652.8
|
|
|||||
Expenses
|
|
192.8
|
|
|
205.2
|
|
|
202.0
|
|
|
182.9
|
|
|
163.0
|
|
|||||
Investment income, net
|
|
744.9
|
|
|
671.3
|
|
|
565.1
|
|
|
501.0
|
|
|
489.8
|
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments and mortgage loans payable
|
|
436.7
|
|
|
387.1
|
|
|
619.8
|
|
|
1,145.4
|
|
|
1,628.4
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
1,181.6
|
|
|
1,058.4
|
|
|
1,184.9
|
|
|
1,646.4
|
|
|
2,118.2
|
|
|||||
Participant transactions, net
|
|
(281.6
|
)
|
|
(420.5
|
)
|
|
759.8
|
|
|
884.6
|
|
|
802.9
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets
|
|
$
|
900.0
|
|
|
$
|
637.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,944.7
|
|
|
$
|
2,531.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,921.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||||||||
Total assets
|
|
$
|
28,818.2
|
|
|
$
|
27,453.6
|
|
|
$
|
26,985.2
|
|
|
$
|
24,399.4
|
|
|
$
|
22,408.7
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
2,975.6
|
|
|
2,511.0
|
|
|
2,680.5
|
|
|
2,039.4
|
|
|
2,579.7
|
|
|||||
Total net assets
|
|
$
|
25,842.6
|
|
|
$
|
24,942.6
|
|
|
$
|
24,304.7
|
|
|
$
|
22,360.0
|
|
|
$
|
19,829.0
|
|
Number of per accumulation unit amounts
|
|
60.7
|
|
|
61.3
|
|
|
62.4
|
|
|
60.4
|
|
|
57.9
|
|
|||||
Net asset value, per accumulation unit
|
|
$
|
417.416
|
|
|
$
|
398.329
|
|
|
$
|
381.636
|
|
|
$
|
362.773
|
|
|
$
|
335.393
|
|
Mortgage loans payable
|
|
$
|
2,608.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,238.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,332.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,794.4
|
|
|
$
|
2,373.8
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
March 31
|
|
June 30
|
|
September 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
|||||||||||||
Investment income, net
|
|
$
|
179.9
|
|
|
$
|
200.6
|
|
|
$
|
178.0
|
|
|
$
|
186.4
|
|
|
$
|
744.9
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and mortgage loans payable
|
|
55.0
|
|
|
204.8
|
|
|
119.2
|
|
|
57.7
|
|
|
436.7
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
234.9
|
|
|
$
|
405.4
|
|
|
$
|
297.2
|
|
|
$
|
244.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,181.6
|
|
Total return
|
|
0.95
|
%
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
0.95
|
%
|
|
4.79
|
%
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
March 31
|
|
June 30
|
|
September 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
|||||||||||||
Investment income, net
|
|
$
|
139.2
|
|
|
$
|
166.0
|
|
|
$
|
180.6
|
|
|
$
|
185.5
|
|
|
$
|
671.3
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and mortgage loans payable
|
|
135.1
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
|
86.2
|
|
|
133.5
|
|
|
387.1
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
274.3
|
|
|
$
|
198.3
|
|
|
$
|
266.8
|
|
|
$
|
319.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,058.4
|
|
Total return
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
|
0.81
|
%
|
|
1.08
|
%
|
|
1.29
|
%
|
|
4.37
|
%
|
•
|
Acquiring and Owning Real Estate.
The risks associated with acquiring and owning real property, including general economic and real estate market conditions, the availability of, and economic cost associated with, financing the Account’s properties, the risk that the Account’s properties become too concentrated (whether by geography, sector or by tenant mix), competition for acquiring real estate properties, leasing risk (including
|
•
|
Selling Real Estate.
The risk that the sales price of a property might differ, perhaps significantly, from its estimated or appraised value, leading to losses or reduced profits to the Account, the risk that the Account might not be able to sell a property at a particular time for a price which management believes represents its fair or full value, the risk of a lack of availability of financing (for potential purchasers of the Account’s properties), risks associated with disruptions in the credit and capital markets, and the risk that the Account may be required to make significant expenditures before the Account is able to market and/or sell a property;
|
•
|
Valuation.
The risks associated with property valuations, including the fact that appraisals can be subjective in a number of respects and the fact that the Account’s appraisals are generally obtained on a quarterly basis and there may be periods in between appraisals of a property during which the value attributed to the property for purposes of the Account’s daily accumulation unit value may be more or less than the actual realizable value of the property;
|
•
|
Borrowing.
Risks associated with financing the Account’s properties, including the risk of default on loans secured by the Account’s properties (which could lead to foreclosure), the risk of default under unsecured line of credit or credit facilities underwritten by third-party lenders, the risk associated with high loan-to-value ratios on the Account’s properties (including the fact that the Account may have limited, or no net value in such a property), the risk that significant sums of cash could be required to make principal and interest payments on the loans and the risk that the Account may not have the ability to obtain financing or refinancing on favorable terms (or at all), which may be aggravated by general disruptions in credit and capital markets;
|
•
|
Participant Transactions and Cash Management.
Investment risk associated with participant transactions, in particular that (i) significant net participant transfers out of the Account may impair our ability to pursue or consummate new investment opportunities that are otherwise attractive to the Account and/ or may result in sales of real estate-related assets to generate liquidity, (ii) significant net participant transfers into the Account may result, on a temporary basis, in our cash holdings and/or holdings in liquid non-real estate-related investments exceeding our long-term targeted holding levels and (iii) high levels of cash and liquid non-real estate-related investments in the Account during times of appreciating real estate values can impair the Account’s overall return;
|
•
|
Joint Venture Investments.
The risks associated with joint ventures organized as limited partnerships or limited liability companies, as applicable, including the risk that a co-venturer may have interests or goals inconsistent with that of the Account, that a co-venturer may have financial difficulties, and the risk that the Account may have limited rights with respect to operation of the property and transfer of the Account’s interest;
|
•
|
Regulatory Matters.
Uncertainties associated with environmental liability and regulations and other governmental regulatory matters such as zoning laws, rent control laws, and property taxes;
|
•
|
Foreign Investments.
The risks associated with purchasing, owning and disposing foreign investments (primarily foreign real estate properties, foreign real estate loans, and foreign mezzanine and other debt), including political risk, the risk associated with foreign currency fluctuations (whether hedged or not), regulatory and taxation risks and risks of enforcing judgments;
|
•
|
Conflicts of Interest.
Conflicts of interest associated with TIAA serving as investment manager of the Account and provider of the liquidity guarantee at the same time as TIAA and its affiliates are serving as an investment manager to other real estate accounts or funds, including conflicts associated with satisfying its fiduciary duties to all such accounts and funds associated with purchasing, selling and leasing of properties;
|
•
|
Required Property Sales.
The risk that, if TIAA were to own too large a percentage of the Account’s accumulation units through funding the liquidity guarantee (as determined by the independent fiduciary), the independent fiduciary could require the sales of properties to reduce TIAA’s ownership interest, which sales could occur at times and at prices that depress the sale proceeds to the Account;
|
•
|
Government and Government Agency Securities.
Risks associated with investment securities issued by U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored entities, including the risk that the issuer may not have their securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, and that transaction activity may fluctuate significantly from time to time, which could negatively impact the value of the securities and the Account’s ability to dispose of a security at a favorable time; and
|
•
|
Liquid Assets and Securities.
Risks associated with investments in real estate-related liquid assets (which could include, from time to time, registered or unregistered REIT securities and CMBS), and non-real estate-related liquid assets, including:
|
•
|
Financial/credit risk—Risks that the issuer will not be able to pay principal and interest when due or that the issuer’s earnings will fall;
|
•
|
Market volatility risk—Risk that the changing conditions in financial markets may cause the Account’s investments to experience price volatility;
|
•
|
Interest rate volatility risk—Risk that interest rate volatility may affect the Account’s current income from an investment or the pricing of that investment. In general, changing interest rates could have unpredictable effects on the markets and may expose markets to heightened volatility; and
|
•
|
Deposit/money market risk—Risks that the Account could experience losses if banks fail.
|
|
|
|
|
Actuals
|
|
Forecast
|
||||||||
2018
|
|
1Q 2018
|
|
2Q 2018
|
|
3Q 2018
|
|
4Q 2018
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|||
Economy
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Domestic Product ("GDP")
|
|
3.2%
|
|
2.2%
|
|
4.2%
|
|
3.4%
|
|
1.9%
|
|
2.5%
|
|
1.9%
|
Employment Growth (Thousands)
|
|
2,638
|
|
655
|
|
651
|
|
568
|
|
695
|
|
2,590
|
|
1,800
|
Unemployment Rate
|
|
3.9%
|
|
4.1%
|
|
4.0%
|
|
3.7%
|
|
3.9%
|
|
4.4%
|
|
4.1%
|
Interest Rates
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 Year Treasury
|
|
3.0%
|
|
2.8%
|
|
2.9%
|
|
2.9%
|
|
3.0%
|
|
3.0%
|
|
3.1%
|
*
|
Data subject to revision
|
(1)
|
GDP growth rates are annual rates. Quarterly unemployment rates are the reported value for the final month of the quarter while average annual values represent a twelve-month average.
|
(2)
|
The Treasury rates are an average over the stated period.
|
Top 5 Metro Areas by Fair Value
|
|
Account %
Leased Fair
Value
Weighted*
|
|
Number of
Property
Investments
|
|
Metro Area
Fair Value
as a % of Total
RE Portfolio**
|
|
Metro Area
Fair Value
as a % of Total
Investments**
|
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
|
|
85.3%
|
|
13
|
|
11.0%
|
|
8.5%
|
New York-Jersey City-White Plains, NY-NJ
|
|
91.8%
|
|
14
|
|
10.9%
|
|
8.3%
|
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA
|
|
91.8%
|
|
15
|
|
9.5%
|
|
7.3%
|
San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA
|
|
94.5%
|
|
8
|
|
6.5%
|
|
5.0%
|
Boston, MA
|
|
91.2%
|
|
6
|
|
5.9%
|
|
4.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account Square Foot Weighted Average Vacancy
|
|
Market Vacancy*
|
||||||
Top 5 Office Metropolitan Areas
|
|
Total Sector by Metro Area ($M)
|
|
% of Total
Investments
|
|
2018 Q4
|
|
2018 Q3
|
|
2018 Q4
|
|
2018 Q3
|
||
Account / Nation
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.9%
|
|
14.2%
|
|
12.6%
|
|
12.8%
|
||
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
|
|
$
|
1,464.3
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
19.7%
|
|
18.1%
|
|
14.9%
|
|
14.9%
|
San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA
|
|
1,211.7
|
|
|
4.3%
|
|
3.2%
|
|
3.7%
|
|
5.5%
|
|
6.0%
|
|
Boston, MA
|
|
1,188.3
|
|
|
4.2%
|
|
10.0%
|
|
11.7%
|
|
9.4%
|
|
9.2%
|
|
New York-Jersey City-White Plains, NY-NJ
|
|
1,167.0
|
|
|
4.1%
|
|
23.5%
|
|
30.0%
|
|
9.3%
|
|
9.1%
|
|
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA
|
|
751.2
|
|
|
2.6%
|
|
6.5%
|
|
8.3%
|
|
12.9%
|
|
13.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account Square Foot Weighted Average Vacancy
|
|
Market Vacancy*
|
||||||
Top 5 Industrial Metropolitan Areas
|
|
Total Sector by Metro Area ($M)
|
|
% of Total
Investments
|
|
2018 Q4
|
|
2018 Q3
|
|
2018 Q4
|
|
2018 Q3
|
||
Account / Nation
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5%
|
|
7.7%
|
|
7.0%
|
|
7.1%
|
||
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
|
|
$
|
841.8
|
|
|
3.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
6.0%
|
|
5.9%
|
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA
|
|
369.4
|
|
|
1.3%
|
|
8.5%
|
|
5.2%
|
|
4.5%
|
|
4.5%
|
|
Tacoma-Lakewood, WA
|
|
346.6
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
2.0%
|
|
2.0%
|
|
4.6%
|
|
4.8%
|
|
Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL
|
|
274.4
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
15.4%
|
|
15.4%
|
|
5.6%
|
|
5.4%
|
|
Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX
|
|
273.5
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
12.7%
|
|
12.7%
|
|
9.3%
|
|
9.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account Units Weighted Average Vacancy
|
|
Market Vacancy*
|
||||||
Top 5 Apartment Metropolitan Areas
|
|
Total Sector by
Metro Area ($M)
|
|
% of Total
Investments
|
|
2018 Q4
|
|
2018 Q3
|
|
2018 Q4
|
|
2018 Q3
|
||
Account / Nation
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2%
|
|
6.8%
|
|
4.0%
|
|
4.2%
|
||
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
|
|
$
|
783.8
|
|
|
2.8%
|
|
6.0%
|
|
8.1%
|
|
4.3%
|
|
4.7%
|
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA
|
|
685.3
|
|
|
2.4%
|
|
6.7%
|
|
7.6%
|
|
3.1%
|
|
3.6%
|
|
New York-Jersey City-White Plains, NY-NJ
|
|
524.3
|
|
|
1.8%
|
|
3.5%
|
|
6.2%
|
|
2.6%
|
|
3.1%
|
|
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO
|
|
404.4
|
|
|
1.4%
|
|
7.4%
|
|
4.9%
|
|
4.5%
|
|
4.9%
|
|
San Diego-Carlsbad, CA
|
|
320.9
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
5.6%
|
|
4.3%
|
|
3.6%
|
|
3.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account Square Foot Weighted Average Vacancy
|
|
Market Vacancy*
|
||||||
|
|
Total by
Retail Type ($M)
|
|
% of Total
Investments
|
|
2018 Q4
|
|
2018 Q3
|
|
2018 Q4
|
|
2018 Q3
|
||
National Retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9%
|
|
5.4%
|
|
6.3%
|
|
6.4%
|
||
Lifestyle & Mall
|
|
$
|
2,540.1
|
|
|
60.6%
|
|
4.8%
|
|
5.0%
|
|
5.3%
|
|
5.8%
|
Neighborhood, Community & Strip**
|
|
1,061.3
|
|
|
25.3%
|
|
7.1%
|
|
6.3%
|
|
9.0%
|
|
9.1%
|
|
Power Center**
|
|
592.6
|
|
|
14.1%
|
|
4.2%
|
|
2.1%
|
|
6.9%
|
|
6.8%
|
(1)
|
Wholly-owned properties are represented at fair value and gross of any debt, while joint venture properties are represented at the net equity value.
|
(2)
|
Represents interests in Storage Portfolio investments, a fee interest encumbered by a ground lease real estate investment and land.
|
Ten Largest Real Estate Investments
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property Investment Name
|
|
Ownership Percentage
|
|
City
|
|
State
|
|
Type
|
|
Gross Real Estate Fair Value
(1)
|
|
Debt Fair Value
(2)
|
|
Net Real Estate Fair Value
(3)
|
|
Property as a
% of Total Real Estate Portfolio (4) |
|
Property as a
% of Total Investments (5) |
||||||
Fashion Show
|
|
50%
|
|
Las Vegas
|
|
NV
|
|
Retail
|
|
$
|
1,218.1
|
|
|
$
|
412.2
|
|
|
$
|
805.9
|
|
|
4.9%
|
|
3.9%
|
DDR
|
|
85%
|
|
Various
|
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Retail
|
|
1,179.1
|
|
|
537.8
|
|
|
641.3
|
|
|
4.7%
|
|
3.7%
|
|||
The Florida Mall
|
|
50%
|
|
Orlando
|
|
FL
|
|
Retail
|
|
925.8
|
|
|
160.9
|
|
|
764.9
|
|
|
3.7%
|
|
2.9%
|
|||
Simpson Housing Portfolio
|
|
80%
|
|
Various
|
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Apartment
|
|
786.8
|
|
|
391.9
|
|
|
394.9
|
|
|
3.1%
|
|
2.5%
|
|||
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue
|
|
100%
|
|
Washington
|
|
D.C.
|
|
Office
|
|
782.8
|
|
|
317.8
|
|
|
465.0
|
|
|
3.1%
|
|
2.5%
|
|||
Colorado Center
|
|
50%
|
|
Santa Monica
|
|
CA
|
|
Office
|
|
609.9
|
|
|
258.3
|
|
|
351.6
|
|
|
2.4%
|
|
1.9%
|
|||
Fourth and Madison
|
|
100%
|
|
Seattle
|
|
WA
|
|
Office
|
|
580.0
|
|
|
280.9
|
|
|
299.1
|
|
|
2.3%
|
|
1.8%
|
|||
99 High Street
|
|
100%
|
|
Boston
|
|
MA
|
|
Office
|
|
506.4
|
|
|
265.1
|
|
|
241.3
|
|
|
2.0%
|
|
1.6%
|
|||
425 Park Avenue
|
|
100%
|
|
New York
|
|
NY
|
|
Ground Lease
|
|
461.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
461.0
|
|
|
1.8%
|
|
1.5%
|
|||
Ontario Industrial Portfolio
|
|
100%
|
|
Ontario
|
|
CA
|
|
Industrial
|
|
421.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
421.8
|
|
|
1.7%
|
|
1.3%
|
(1)
|
The Account's share of the fair value of the property investment, gross of debt.
|
(2)
|
Debt fair values are presented at the Account's ownership interest.
|
(3)
|
The Account's share of the fair value of the property investment, net of debt.
|
(4)
|
Total real estate portfolio is the aggregate fair value of the Account's wholly-owned properties and the properties held within a joint venture, gross of debt.
|
(5)
|
Total investments are the aggregate fair value of all investments held by the Account, gross of debt. Total investments, as calculated within this table, will vary from total investments, as calculated in the Account's Schedule of Investments, as joint venture investments are presented in the Schedule of Investments at their net equity position in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principals ("GAAP").
|
Property Investments Acquired in 2018
(millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Property Name
|
|
Ownership Percentage
|
|
Property Type
|
|
City
|
|
State
|
|
Net Purchase Price (less closing costs)
|
Mortgage Debt
|
|
||||
Wholly-Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
30700 Russell Ranch
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Office
|
|
Westlake Village
|
|
CA
|
|
$
|
32.8
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Carrington Park
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Plano
|
|
TX
|
|
64.2
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Churchill on the Park
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Dallas
|
|
TX
|
|
71.2
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Lofts at SoDo
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Orlando
|
|
FL
|
|
66.7
|
|
35.1
|
|
|
||
Biltmore at Midtown
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
GA
|
|
69.5
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
||
3131 McKinney
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Office
|
|
Dallas
|
|
TX
|
|
47.8
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Cherry Knoll
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Germantown
|
|
MD
|
|
58.8
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
||
Centric Gateway
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
NC
|
|
68.9
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Ascent at Windward
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Alpharetta
|
|
GA
|
|
67.8
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
||
Fusion 1560
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
St. Petersburg
|
|
FL
|
|
81.3
|
|
37.4
|
|
|
||
10 New Maple Avenue
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Industrial
|
|
Pine Brook
|
|
NJ
|
|
18.2
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Otay Mesa Industrial Portfolio
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Industrial
|
|
San Diego
|
|
CA
|
|
28.7
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Rancho Del Mar
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
San Clemente
|
|
CA
|
|
92.6
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Riverchase Village
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Retail
|
|
Hoover
|
|
AL
|
|
39.1
|
|
—
|
|
|
Property Investments Acquired in 2018
(millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Property Name
|
|
Ownership Percentage
|
|
Property Type
|
|
City
|
|
State
|
|
Net Purchase Price (less closing costs)
|
Mortgage Debt
|
|
||||
12910 Mulberry Drive
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Industrial
|
|
Whittier
|
|
CA
|
|
$
|
21.6
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
5 West
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Tampa
|
|
FL
|
|
62.0
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Total Wholly-Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
891.2
|
|
$
|
178.8
|
|
|
Joint Ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
West Town Mall
(1)
|
|
50.00%
|
|
Retail
|
|
Knoxville
|
|
TN
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Park on Morton
|
|
97.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Bloomington
|
|
IN
|
|
54.3
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
||
The Forum - Sam Houston
|
|
97.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Huntsville
|
|
TX
|
|
32.2
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
||
T-C 501 Boylston Street Member, LLC
(2)
|
|
50.10%
|
|
Office
|
|
Boston
|
|
MA
|
|
284.2
|
|
108.5
|
|
(3)
|
||
Aspen Heights
|
|
97.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Austin
|
|
TX
|
|
80.6
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
||
Cabana Beach San Marcos
|
|
97.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
San Marcos
|
|
TX
|
|
45.9
|
|
22.8
|
|
|
||
Simpson Housing Portfolio
|
|
80.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Various
|
|
U.S.A.
|
|
781.1
|
|
392.0
|
|
|
||
440 Ninth Avenue
|
|
88.52%
|
|
Office
|
|
New York
|
|
NY
|
|
239.3
|
|
121.3
|
|
|
||
Total Joint Ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,522.6
|
|
$
|
727.4
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,413.8
|
|
$
|
906.2
|
|
|
Property Investments Sold in 2018
(millions)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Property Name
|
|
Ownership Percentage
|
|
Property
Type
|
|
City
|
|
State
|
|
Net Sales Price
(less selling expense)
(5)
|
|
Mortgage Loan Payoff
|
|
||||
Wholly-Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Urban Centre
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Office
|
|
Tampa
|
|
FL
|
|
$
|
141.1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Chicago Industrial Portfolio
(4)
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Industrial
|
|
Joliet
|
|
IL
|
|
72.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
430 West 15th Street
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Office
|
|
New York
|
|
NY
|
|
152.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Millennium Corporate Park
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Office
|
|
Redmond
|
|
WA
|
|
149.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Amazon Distribution Center
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Industrial
|
|
Teterboro
|
|
NJ
|
|
147.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Castro Station
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Office
|
|
Mountain View
|
|
CA
|
|
178.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
501 Boylston Street
(2)
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Office
|
|
Boston
|
|
MA
|
|
582.6
|
|
|
216.5
|
|
(3)
|
||
The Corner
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
New York
|
|
NY
|
|
218.4
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
|
||
Total Wholly-Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,641.7
|
|
|
$
|
321.5
|
|
|
Joint Ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
400 Fairview
|
|
90.00%
|
|
Office
|
|
Seattle
|
|
WA
|
|
$
|
298.0
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Miami International Mall
(4)
|
|
50.00%
|
|
Retail
|
|
Miami
|
|
FL
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Commerce LIC
|
|
97.50%
|
|
Industrial
|
|
Long Island City
|
|
NY
|
|
67.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Total Joint Ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
369.7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,011.4
|
|
|
$
|
321.5
|
|
|
(1)
|
The Account purchased a 50.0% interest in a building through it's West Town Mall, LLC joint venture investment.
|
(2)
|
On August 21, 2018, the Account sold off 49.9% of its ownership in 501 Boylston Street to Norges Bank ("Norges"), with the Account retaining ownership of the remaining 50.1%. Concurrent with this sale, Norges and the Account formed the joint venture T-C 501 Boylston Street Member, to hold their joint ownership of the property, with Norges contributing 49.9% interest and the Account contributing the remaining 50.1% interest.
|
(3)
|
Represents the transfer of the debt on 501 Boylston Street to the new joint venture with Norges, T-C 501 Boylston Street Member, LLC, of which the Account owns 50.1%.
|
(4)
|
Partial sale of properties or land held within this investment.
|
(5)
|
The net sales price represents the Account's interest.
|
|
|
Rental Income
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
Real Estate Taxes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Change
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018
|
2017
|
$
|
%
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
$
|
%
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
$
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Same Property
|
|
$
|
922.7
|
|
$
|
912.0
|
|
$
|
10.7
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
197.9
|
|
$
|
191.6
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
154.7
|
|
$
|
145.9
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Properties Acquired
|
|
81.7
|
|
13.4
|
|
68.3
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
1.8
|
|
15.4
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
2.0
|
|
12.0
|
|
N/M
|
|
|||||||||
Properties Sold
|
|
78.8
|
|
134.2
|
|
(55.4
|
)
|
N/M
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
27.8
|
|
(14.3
|
)
|
N/M
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
18.8
|
|
(8.6
|
)
|
N/M
|
|
|||||||||
Impact of Properties Acquired/Sold
|
|
160.5
|
|
147.6
|
|
12.9
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
29.6
|
|
1.1
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
20.8
|
|
3.4
|
|
N/M
|
|
|||||||||
Total Property Portfolio
|
|
$
|
1,083.2
|
|
$
|
1,059.6
|
|
$
|
23.6
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
228.6
|
|
$
|
221.2
|
|
$
|
7.4
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
178.9
|
|
$
|
166.7
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
Rental Income
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
Real Estate Taxes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Change
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017
|
2016
|
$
|
%
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
$
|
%
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
$
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Same Property
|
|
$
|
971.1
|
|
$
|
947.1
|
|
$
|
24.0
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
201.1
|
|
$
|
199.5
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
151.7
|
|
$
|
147.3
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
Properties Acquired
|
|
70.3
|
|
21.6
|
|
48.7
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
5.4
|
|
9.6
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
6.0
|
|
6.5
|
|
N/M
|
|
|||||||||
Properties Sold
|
|
18.2
|
|
40.3
|
|
(22.1
|
)
|
N/M
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
13.2
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
N/M
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
5.4
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
N/M
|
|
|||||||||
Impact of Properties Acquired/Sold
|
|
88.5
|
|
61.9
|
|
26.6
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
18.6
|
|
1.5
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
11.4
|
|
3.6
|
|
N/M
|
|
|||||||||
Total Property Portfolio
|
|
$
|
1,059.6
|
|
$
|
1,009.0
|
|
$
|
50.6
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
221.2
|
|
$
|
218.1
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
166.7
|
|
$
|
158.7
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
•
|
establishing the percentage of total accumulation units that TIAA’s ownership should not exceed (the “trigger point”) and creating a method for reviewing the trigger point;
|
•
|
approving any adjustment of TIAA’s ownership interest in the Account and, in its discretion, requiring an adjustment if TIAA’s ownership of liquidity units reaches the trigger point; and
|
•
|
once the trigger point has been reached, participating in any program to reduce TIAA’s ownership in the Account by utilizing cash flow or liquid investments in the Account, or by utilizing the proceeds from asset sales. If the independent fiduciary were to determine that TIAA’s ownership should be reduced following the trigger point, its role in participating in any asset sales program would include (i) participating in the selection of properties for sale, (ii) providing sales guidelines and (iii) approving those sales if, in the independent fiduciary’s opinion, such sales are desirable to reduce TIAA’s ownership of liquidity units.
|
Property Name
|
|
Purchase Date
|
|
Ownership Percentage
|
|
Sector
|
|
Location
|
|
Net Purchase Price
(1)
|
||
Otay Mesa Industrial Portfolio
|
|
10/01/2018
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Industrial
|
|
San Diego, CA
|
|
$
|
28.7
|
|
Rancho Del Mar
|
|
10/22/2018
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
San Clemente, CA
|
|
92.6
|
|
|
Riverchase Village
|
|
10/26/2018
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Retail
|
|
Hoover, AL
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
Cabana Beach San Marcos
|
|
10/26/2018
|
|
97.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
San Marcos, TX
|
|
45.9
|
|
|
12910 Mulberry Drive
|
|
11/15/2018
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Industrial
|
|
Whittier, CA
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
Simpson Housing Portfolio
|
|
11/29/2018
|
|
80.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Various, U.S.A.
|
|
781.1
|
|
|
440 Ninth Avenue
|
|
12/06/2018
|
|
88.52%
|
|
Office
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
239.3
|
|
|
5 West
|
|
12/19/2018
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Tampa, FL
|
|
62.0
|
|
(1)
|
The net purchase price represents the purchase price and closing costs.
|
Property Name
|
|
Sales Date
|
|
Ownership Percentage
|
|
Sector
|
|
Location
|
|
Net Sales Price
(1)
|
Realized Gain on Sale
(2)
|
||||
Miami International Mall
(3)
|
|
11/09/2018
|
|
50.00%
|
|
Retail
|
|
Miami, FL
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
The Corner
|
|
12/20/2018
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
218.4
|
|
8.8
|
|
||
Commerce LIC
|
|
12/20/2018
|
|
97.50%
|
|
Industrial
|
|
Long Island City, NY
|
|
67.6
|
|
12.0
|
|
(1)
|
The net sales price represents the sales price, less selling expenses.
|
(2)
|
Majority of the realized gain has been previously recognized as unrealized gains in the Account's Consolidated Statements of Operations.
|
(3)
|
Partial sale of land associated with the joint venture investment.
|
Borrower Name
|
|
Financing Date
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Sector
|
|
Maturity Date
|
Location
|
|
Loan Amount
(1)
|
||
Project Glacier Mezzanine
|
|
11/07/2018
|
|
4.40% + LIBOR
|
|
Industrial
|
|
11/09/2020
|
Various U.S.A.
|
|
$
|
176.4
|
|
1330 Broadway Mezzanine
(2)
|
|
11/08/2018
|
|
2.40% + LIBOR
|
|
Office
|
|
08/10/2023
|
Oakland, CA
|
|
(100.0
|
)
|
|
Rosemont Towson Mezzanine
(3)
|
|
11/20/2018
|
|
2.15% + LIBOR
|
|
Apartments
|
|
09/09/2022
|
Towson, MD
|
|
(78.5
|
)
|
|
Great Value Storage Portfolio Mezzanine
|
|
12/03/2018
|
|
7.875%
|
|
Storage
|
|
12/06/2023
|
Various U.S.A.
|
|
63.0
|
|
(1)
|
Amount represents the Account's principal balance of the loan receivable position.
|
(2)
|
On November 8, 2018, the Account sold off its interest in the senior mortgage.
|
(3)
|
On November 20, 2018, the Account sold off its interest in the senior mortgage.
|
Property Name
|
|
Financing Date
|
|
Ownership Percentage
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Sector
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
Location
|
|
Financing Amount
(1)
|
||
Cabana Beach San Marcos
|
|
10/26/2018
|
|
97.00%
|
|
4.43%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
11/01/2025
|
|
San Marcos, TX
|
|
$
|
22.8
|
|
Simpson Housing Portfolio
(2)
|
|
11/29/2018
|
|
80.00%
|
|
4.11%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
12/01/2025
|
|
Various, U.S.A.
|
|
196.0
|
|
|
Simpson Housing Portfolio
(2)
|
|
11/29/2018
|
|
80.00%
|
|
3.37% + LIBOR
|
|
Apartments
|
|
12/01/2025
|
|
Various, U.S.A.
|
|
196.0
|
|
|
440 Ninth Avenue
|
|
12/06/2018
|
|
88.52%
|
|
4.02%
|
|
Office
|
|
01/01/2026
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
121.3
|
|
|
Four Oaks Place
(3)
|
|
12/20/2018
|
|
51.00%
|
|
1.45% + LIBOR
|
|
Office
|
|
12/20/2018
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
(81.6
|
)
|
|
Four Oaks Place
(3)
|
|
12/20/2018
|
|
51.00%
|
|
4.43%
|
|
Office
|
|
01/01/2026
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
81.6
|
|
|
The Corner
|
|
12/20/2018
|
|
100.00%
|
|
3.51%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
06/01/2021
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
(105.0
|
)
|
(1)
|
Values represent new mortgage loans and any loans assumed, transferred, refinanced or paid off during the fourth quarter of 2018.
|
(2)
|
Two senior mortgages were placed on the Simpson Housing Portfolio at acquisition, one at a fixed rate of interest at 4.11% and the other at a floating rate of interest at 3.37% + LIBOR. The mortgages are cross-collateralized by 12 apartment properties held within the portfolio.
|
(3)
|
Four Oaks Place LP, a joint venture investment in which the Account holds a 51% interest, refinanced mortgage debt with a new lender. The principal outstanding remained unchanged, but the interest rate and maturity date were modified.
|
|
|
Amounts Due During Years Ending December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
2022
|
|
2023
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Loans Payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Principal Payments
|
|
$
|
107.2
|
|
|
$
|
171.7
|
|
|
$
|
20.0
|
|
|
$
|
407.7
|
|
|
$
|
686.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,295.1
|
|
|
$
|
2,688.1
|
|
Interest Payments
(2)
|
|
102.4
|
|
|
97.3
|
|
|
91.0
|
|
|
82.4
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
|
149.4
|
|
|
584.5
|
|
|||||||
Total Mortgage Loans Payable
|
|
$
|
209.6
|
|
|
$
|
269.0
|
|
|
$
|
111.0
|
|
|
$
|
490.1
|
|
|
$
|
748.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,444.5
|
|
|
$
|
3,272.6
|
|
Other Commitments
(3)
|
|
101.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
101.0
|
|
|||||||
Tenant improvements
(4)
|
|
83.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
83.3
|
|
|||||||
Total Contractual Obligations
|
|
$
|
393.9
|
|
|
$
|
269.0
|
|
|
$
|
111.0
|
|
|
$
|
490.1
|
|
|
$
|
748.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,444.5
|
|
|
$
|
3,456.9
|
|
(1)
|
The contractual obligations do not include payments on debt held in joint ventures, which are the obligation of the individual joint venture entities.
|
(2)
|
These amounts represent interest payments due on mortgage loans payable based on the stated rates at
December 31, 2018
.
|
(3)
|
This includes the Account’s commitment to purchase interest in its limited partnerships, which could be called by the partner at any time.
|
(4)
|
This amount represents tenant improvements and leasing inducements committed by the Account as of
December 31, 2018
.
|
•
|
Buyer and seller are typically motivated;
|
•
|
Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their best interests;
|
•
|
A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market;
|
•
|
Payment is made in terms of cash or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and
|
•
|
The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale.
|
•
|
the value of the Account’s cash; cash equivalents, and short-term and other debt instruments;
|
•
|
the value of the Account’s other securities and other non-real estate assets;
|
•
|
the value of the individual real properties (based on the most recent valuation of that property) and other real estate-related investments owned by the Account;
|
•
|
an estimate of the net operating income accrued by the Account from its properties, other real estate-related investments and non-real estate-related investments (including short-term marketable securities) since the end of the prior valuation day; and
|
•
|
actual net operating income earned from the Account’s properties, other real estate-related investments and non-real estate-related investments (but only to the extent any such item of income differs from the estimated income accrued for on such investments),
|
•
|
General Real Estate Risk—The risk that the Account’s property values or rental and occupancy rates could go down due to general economic conditions, a weak market for real estate generally, disruptions in the credit and/or capital markets, or changing supply and demand for certain types of properties;
|
•
|
Appraisal Risk—The risk that the sale price of an Account property (i.e
.
, the value that would be determined by negotiations between independent parties) might differ substantially from its estimated or appraised value, leading to losses or reduced profits to the Account upon sale;
|
•
|
Risk Relating to Property Sales—The risk that the Account might not be able to sell a property at a particular time for its full value, particularly in a poor market. This might make it difficult to raise cash quickly and also could lead to Account losses;
|
•
|
Risks of Borrowing—The risk that interest rate changes may impact Account returns if the Account takes out a mortgage on a property, buys a property subject to a mortgage or holds a property subject to a mortgage, and hedging against such interest rate changes, if undertaken by the Account, may entail additional costs and be unsuccessful; and
|
•
|
Foreign Currency Risk—The risk that the value of the Account’s foreign investments, related debt, or rental income could increase or decrease due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates or foreign currency exchange control regulations, and hedging against such currency changes, if undertaken by the Account, may entail additional costs and be unsuccessful.
|
•
|
Financial/Credit Risk—The risk, for debt securities, that the issuer will not be able to pay principal and interest when due (and/or declare bankruptcy or be subject to receivership) and, for equity securities such as common
|
•
|
Market Volatility Risk—The risk that the Account’s investments will experience price volatility due to changing conditions in the financial markets regardless of the credit quality or financial condition of the underlying issuer. This risk is particularly acute to the extent the Account holds equity securities, which have experienced significant short-term price volatility over the past year. Also, to the extent the Account holds debt securities, changes in overall interest rates can cause price fluctuations.
|
•
|
Interest Rate Volatility—The risk that interest rate volatility may affect the Account’s current income from an investment.
|
•
|
Deposit/Money Market Risk—The risk that, to the extent the Account’s cash held in bank deposit accounts exceeds federally insured limits as to that bank, the Account could experience losses if banks fail. The Account does not believe it has exposure to significant concentration of deposit risk. In addition, there is some risk that investments held in money market accounts can suffer losses.
|
|
Page
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ Carol W. Deckbar
|
|
Executive Vice President, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America and Chief Product Officer of TIAA Financial Solutions Product Group
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Oluseun S. Salami
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Investments, at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Real estate properties
(cost: $12,687.8 and $12,972.5) |
|
$
|
15,531.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,742.7
|
|
|
Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships
(cost: $5,207.8 and $4,675.3) |
|
6,532.5
|
|
|
|
6,003.0
|
|
|
||
Marketable securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Real estate related
(cost: $1,274.7 and $991.0) |
|
1,415.1
|
|
(1)
|
|
1,238.0
|
|
(1)
|
||
Other
(cost: $4,088.9 and $3,888.1) |
|
4,088.7
|
|
|
|
3,887.5
|
|
|
||
Loans receivable
(cost: $910.6 and $296.7) |
|
913.0
|
|
|
|
298.8
|
|
|
||
Total investments
(cost: $24,169.8 and $22,823.6) |
|
28,480.4
|
|
|
|
27,170.0
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
||
Due from investment manager
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
||
Other
|
|
331.8
|
|
(2)
|
|
270.9
|
|
(2)
|
||
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
28,818.2
|
|
|
|
27,453.6
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Mortgage loans payable, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
(principal outstanding: $2,688.1 and $2,238.6)
|
|
2,608.0
|
|
|
|
2,238.3
|
|
|
||
Accrued real estate property expenses
|
|
222.4
|
|
|
|
199.1
|
|
|
||
Payable for collateral for securities loaned
|
|
68.8
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
||
Other
|
|
76.4
|
|
|
|
55.1
|
|
|
||
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
2,975.6
|
|
|
|
2,511.0
|
|
|
||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NET ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Accumulation Fund
|
|
25,320.1
|
|
|
|
24,430.8
|
|
|
||
Annuity Fund
|
|
522.5
|
|
|
|
511.8
|
|
|
||
TOTAL NET ASSETS
|
|
$
|
25,842.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,942.6
|
|
|
NUMBER OF ACCUMULATION UNITS OUTSTANDING
|
|
60.7
|
|
|
|
61.3
|
|
|
||
NET ASSET VALUE, PER ACCUMULATION UNIT
|
|
$
|
417.416
|
|
|
|
$
|
398.329
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Real estate income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Rental income
|
|
$
|
1,083.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,059.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,009.0
|
|
Real estate property level expenses and taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Operating expenses
|
|
228.6
|
|
|
221.2
|
|
|
218.1
|
|
|||
Real estate taxes
|
|
178.9
|
|
|
166.7
|
|
|
158.7
|
|
|||
Interest expense
|
|
113.9
|
|
|
89.7
|
|
|
85.8
|
|
|||
Total real estate property level expenses and taxes
|
|
521.4
|
|
|
477.6
|
|
|
462.6
|
|
|||
Real estate income, net
|
|
561.8
|
|
|
582.0
|
|
|
546.4
|
|
|||
Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships
|
|
204.7
|
|
|
214.1
|
|
|
161.8
|
|
|||
Interest
|
|
120.4
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|||
Dividends
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|||
TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME
|
|
937.7
|
|
|
876.5
|
|
|
767.1
|
|
|||
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Investment management charges
|
|
62.1
|
|
|
72.0
|
|
|
72.6
|
|
|||
Administrative charges
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
59.3
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
|||
Distribution charges
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
|
27.7
|
|
|||
Mortality and expense risk charges
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|||
Liquidity guarantee charges
|
|
50.5
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
38.4
|
|
|||
TOTAL EXPENSES
|
|
192.8
|
|
|
205.2
|
|
|
202.0
|
|
|||
INVESTMENT INCOME, NET
|
|
744.9
|
|
|
671.3
|
|
|
565.1
|
|
|||
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Real estate properties
|
|
242.7
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|||
Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships
|
|
75.9
|
|
|
(21.9
|
)
|
|
0.6
|
|
|||
Marketable securities
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|||
Mortgage loans payable
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
Net realized gain on investments
|
|
331.0
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Real estate properties
|
|
73.1
|
|
|
135.5
|
|
|
317.5
|
|
|||
Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships
|
|
55.5
|
|
|
146.8
|
|
|
236.9
|
|
|||
Marketable securities
|
|
(103.0
|
)
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|||
Loans receivable
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|||
Mortgage loans payable
|
|
79.8
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on
investments and mortgage loans payable
|
|
105.7
|
|
|
349.4
|
|
|
599.8
|
|
|||
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED
GAIN ON INVESTMENTS AND
MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE
|
|
436.7
|
|
|
387.1
|
|
|
619.8
|
|
|||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS
RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
$
|
1,181.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,058.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,184.9
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
||||||||
FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Investment income, net
|
|
$
|
744.9
|
|
|
$
|
671.3
|
|
|
$
|
565.1
|
|
Net realized gain on investments
|
|
331.0
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and mortgage loans payable
|
|
105.7
|
|
|
349.4
|
|
|
599.8
|
|
|||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
1,181.6
|
|
|
1,058.4
|
|
|
1,184.9
|
|
|||
FROM PARTICIPANT TRANSACTIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Premiums
|
|
2,637.4
|
|
|
2,561.7
|
|
|
3,064.2
|
|
|||
Annuity payments
|
|
(45.0
|
)
|
|
(43.4
|
)
|
|
(41.0
|
)
|
|||
Withdrawals and death benefits
|
|
(2,874.0
|
)
|
|
(2,938.8
|
)
|
|
(2,263.4
|
)
|
|||
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN NET ASSETS
RESULTING FROM PARTICIPANT TRANSACTIONS
|
|
(281.6
|
)
|
|
(420.5
|
)
|
|
759.8
|
|
|||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS
|
|
900.0
|
|
|
637.9
|
|
|
1,944.7
|
|
|||
NET ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Beginning of period
|
|
24,942.6
|
|
|
24,304.7
|
|
|
22,360.0
|
|
|||
End of period
|
|
$
|
25,842.6
|
|
|
$
|
24,942.6
|
|
|
$
|
24,304.7
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
1,181.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,058.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,184.9
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net changes in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net realized gain on investments
|
|
(331.0
|
)
|
|
(37.7
|
)
|
|
(20.0
|
)
|
|||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and mortgage loans payable
|
|
(105.7
|
)
|
|
(349.4
|
)
|
|
(599.8
|
)
|
|||
Purchase of real estate properties
|
|
(786.3
|
)
|
|
(538.2
|
)
|
|
(623.9
|
)
|
|||
Capital improvements on real estate properties
|
|
(228.6
|
)
|
|
(130.1
|
)
|
|
(157.2
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds from sale of real estate properties
|
|
1,462.7
|
|
|
525.5
|
|
|
251.1
|
|
|||
Purchases of long term investments
|
|
(1,422.2
|
)
|
|
(592.0
|
)
|
|
(1,379.4
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds from long term investments
|
|
756.4
|
|
|
385.3
|
|
|
68.3
|
|
|||
Purchases and originations of loans receivable
|
|
(939.2
|
)
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
(194.8
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds from sales of loans receivable
|
|
257.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
Proceeds from payoffs of loans receivable
|
|
68.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
(Increase) decrease in other investments
|
|
(200.8
|
)
|
|
165.9
|
|
|
153.6
|
|
|||
Change in due (from) to investment manager
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|||
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
(59.7
|
)
|
|
58.2
|
|
|
(107.5
|
)
|
|||
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
|
|
63.0
|
|
|
(72.6
|
)
|
|
122.3
|
|
|||
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
(285.7
|
)
|
|
476.3
|
|
|
(1,302.6
|
)
|
|||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Mortgage loan proceeds received
|
|
712.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
563.5
|
|
|||
Payments of mortgage loans
|
|
(152.2
|
)
|
|
(50.6
|
)
|
|
(34.7
|
)
|
|||
Premiums
|
|
2,637.4
|
|
|
2,561.7
|
|
|
3,064.2
|
|
|||
Annuity payments
|
|
(45.0
|
)
|
|
(43.4
|
)
|
|
(41.0
|
)
|
|||
Withdrawals and death benefits
|
|
(2,874.0
|
)
|
|
(2,938.8
|
)
|
|
(2,263.4
|
)
|
|||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
279.0
|
|
|
(471.1
|
)
|
|
1,288.6
|
|
|||
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
(14.0
|
)
|
|||
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Beginning of period cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
48.8
|
|
|
62.8
|
|
|||
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
(14.0
|
)
|
|||
End of period cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
|
$
|
47.3
|
|
|
$
|
54.0
|
|
|
$
|
48.8
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
108.7
|
|
|
$
|
89.9
|
|
|
$
|
84.2
|
|
Debt assumed as part of a real estate acquisition
|
|
$
|
105.1
|
|
|
$
|
17.7
|
|
|
$
|
24.0
|
|
Loan assignment as part of a real estate disposition
|
|
$
|
216.5
|
|
|
$
|
45.0
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Stock consideration received from the merger of marketable securities
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
11.7
|
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
Restricted cash
(1)
|
43.5
|
|
|
42.3
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|||
TOTAL CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH
|
$
|
47.3
|
|
|
$
|
54.0
|
|
|
$
|
48.8
|
|
•
|
Buyer and seller are typically motivated;
|
•
|
Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their best interests;
|
•
|
A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market;
|
•
|
Payment is made in terms of cash or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and
|
•
|
The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale.
|
•
|
the value of the Account’s cash; cash equivalents, and short-term and other debt instruments;
|
•
|
the value of the Account’s other securities and other non-real estate assets;
|
•
|
the value of the individual real properties (based on the most recent valuation of that property) and other real estate-related investments owned by the Account;
|
•
|
an estimate of the net operating income accrued by the Account from its properties, other real estate-related investments and non-real estate-related investments (including short-term marketable securities) since the end of the prior valuation day; and
|
•
|
actual net operating income earned from the Account’s properties, other real estate-related investments and non-real estate-related investments (but only to the extent any such item of income differs from the estimated income accrued for on such investments),
|
(1)
|
Wholly-owned properties are represented at fair value and gross of any debt, while joint venture properties are represented at the net equity value.
|
(2)
|
Represents interests in Storage Portfolio investments, a fee interest encumbered by a ground lease real estate investment and land.
|
|
Years Ending December 31,
|
||
2019
|
$
|
535.2
|
|
2020
|
497.7
|
|
|
2021
|
431.5
|
|
|
2022
|
366.9
|
|
|
2023
|
307.8
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
2,701.8
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
4,840.9
|
|
•
|
Level 1 fair value inputs are quoted prices for identical items in active, liquid and visible markets such as stock exchanges.
|
•
|
Level 2 fair value inputs are observable information for similar items in active or inactive markets, and appropriately consider counterparty creditworthiness in the valuations.
|
•
|
Level 3 fair value inputs reflect our best estimate of inputs and assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the valuation estimate.
|
Description
|
|
Level 1:
Quoted
Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
|
|
Level 2:
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
|
|
Level 3:
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
|
Fair Value
Using
Practical
Expedient
|
|
Total at
December 31,
2018
|
||||||||||
Real estate properties
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
15,531.1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
15,531.1
|
|
Real estate joint ventures
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,356.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,356.6
|
|
|||||
Limited partnerships
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
175.9
|
|
|
175.9
|
|
|||||
Marketable securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Real estate-related
|
|
1,415.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,415.1
|
|
|||||
Government agency notes
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,050.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,050.7
|
|
|||||
United States Treasury securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,038.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,038.0
|
|
|||||
Loans receivable
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
913.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
913.0
|
|
|||||
Total Investments at
December 31, 2018 |
|
$
|
1,415.1
|
|
|
$
|
4,088.7
|
|
|
$
|
22,800.7
|
|
|
$
|
175.9
|
|
|
$
|
28,480.4
|
|
Mortgage loans payable
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(2,608.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(2,608.0
|
)
|
Description
|
|
Level 1:
Quoted
Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
|
|
Level 2:
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
|
|
Level 3:
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
|
Fair Value
Using
Practical
Expedient
|
|
Total at
December 31,
2017
|
||||||||||
Real estate properties
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
15,742.7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
15,742.7
|
|
Real estate joint ventures
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,860.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,860.6
|
|
|||||
Limited partnerships
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
142.4
|
|
|
142.4
|
|
|||||
Marketable securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Real estate-related
|
|
1,238.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,238.0
|
|
|||||
Government agency notes
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,872.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,872.3
|
|
|||||
United States Treasury securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,015.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,015.2
|
|
|||||
Loans receivable
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
298.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
298.8
|
|
|||||
Total Investments at
December 31, 2017 |
|
$
|
1,238.0
|
|
|
$
|
3,887.5
|
|
|
$
|
21,902.1
|
|
|
$
|
142.4
|
|
|
$
|
27,170.0
|
|
Mortgage loans payable
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(2,238.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(2,238.3
|
)
|
|
|
Real Estate
Properties
|
|
Real Estate
Joint
Ventures
|
|
Loans
Receivable
|
|
Total
Level 3
Investments
|
|
Mortgage
Loans
Payable
|
||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Beginning balance January 1, 2018
|
|
$
|
15,742.7
|
|
|
$
|
5,860.6
|
|
|
$
|
298.8
|
|
|
$
|
21,902.1
|
|
|
$
|
(2,238.3
|
)
|
Total realized and unrealized gains included in changes in net assets
|
|
315.8
|
|
|
116.3
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
432.4
|
|
|
79.4
|
|
|||||
Purchases
(1)
|
|
1,151.8
|
|
|
941.5
|
|
|
939.2
|
|
|
3,032.5
|
|
|
(817.9
|
)
|
|||||
Sales
|
|
(1,679.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(257.3
|
)
|
|
(1,936.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Settlements
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(561.8
|
)
|
|
(68.0
|
)
|
|
(629.8
|
)
|
|
368.8
|
|
|||||
Ending balance December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
15,531.1
|
|
|
$
|
6,356.6
|
|
|
$
|
913.0
|
|
|
$
|
22,800.7
|
|
|
$
|
(2,608.0
|
)
|
|
|
Real Estate
Properties
|
|
Real Estate
Joint
Ventures
|
|
Loans Receivable
|
|
Total
Level 3
Investments
|
|
Mortgage
Loans
Payable
|
||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Beginning balance January 1, 2017
|
|
$
|
15,452.8
|
|
|
$
|
5,622.4
|
|
|
$
|
295.7
|
|
|
$
|
21,370.9
|
|
|
$
|
(2,332.1
|
)
|
Total realized and unrealized gains included in changes in net assets
|
|
177.5
|
|
|
123.5
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
302.2
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|||||
Purchases
(1)
|
|
682.9
|
|
|
419.0
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
1,103.8
|
|
|
(17.7
|
)
|
|||||
Sales
|
|
(570.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(570.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Settlements
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(304.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(304.3
|
)
|
|
95.6
|
|
|||||
Ending balance December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
15,742.7
|
|
|
$
|
5,860.6
|
|
|
$
|
298.8
|
|
|
$
|
21,902.1
|
|
|
$
|
(2,238.3
|
)
|
(1)
|
Includes purchases, contributions for joint ventures, capital expenditures, lending for loans receivable and assumption of mortgage loans payable.
|
(2)
|
Includes operating income for real estate joint ventures net of distributions, principal payments and payoffs of loans receivable, and principal payments and extinguishment of mortgage loans payable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
Asset Class
|
Valuation Technique(s)
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
Range (Weighted Average)
|
|
||||
Real Estate Properties and Joint Ventures
|
Office
|
Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow
|
Discount Rate
|
5.5%–8.6% (6.5%)
|
|
|
|
Terminal Capitalization Rate
|
4.0%–7.5% (5.4%)
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Income Approach—Direct Capitalization
|
Overall Capitalization Rate
|
4.0%–7.0% (4.8%)
|
|
|
|||
|
Industrial
|
Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow
|
Discount Rate
|
5.3%–8.9% (6.8%)
|
|
|
|
Terminal Capitalization Rate
|
4.4%–7.3% (5.5%)
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Income Approach—Direct Capitalization
|
Overall Capitalization Rate
|
4.0%–7.0% (4.9%)
|
|
|
|||
|
Residential
|
Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow
|
Discount Rate
|
5.5%–7.8% (6.5%)
|
|
|
|
Terminal Capitalization Rate
|
3.8%–6.8% (5.0%)
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Income Approach—Direct Capitalization
|
Overall Capitalization Rate
|
3.3%–6.0% (4.5%)
|
|
|
|||
|
Retail
|
Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow
|
Discount Rate
|
5.0%–10.7% (6.4%)
|
|
|
|
Terminal Capitalization Rate
|
4.3%–9.0% (5.3%)
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Income Approach—Direct Capitalization
|
Overall Capitalization Rate
|
3.3%–8.5% (4.7%)
|
|
||||
Mortgage Loans Payable
|
Office and Industrial
|
Discounted Cash Flow
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio
|
36.4%–67.8% (47.6%)
|
|
|
|
Equivalency Rate
|
3.9%–6.2% (4.6%)
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Net Present Value
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio
|
36.4%–67.8% (47.6%)
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk Premium Multiple
|
1.2–1.4 (1.3)
|
|
|
|||
|
Residential
|
Discounted Cash Flow
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio
|
31.9%–63.6% (48.1%)
|
|
|
|
Equivalency Rate
|
3.4%–4.6% (4.1%)
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Net Present Value
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio
|
31.9%–63.6% (48.1%)
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk Premium Multiple
|
1.1–1.4 (1.2)
|
|
|
|||
|
Retail
|
Discounted Cash Flow
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio
|
31.9%–55.3% (39.3%)
|
|
|
|
Equivalency Rate
|
4.3%–5.3% (4.5%)
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Net Present Value
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio
|
31.9%–55.3% (39.3%)
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk Premium Multiple
|
1.1–1.3 (1.2)
|
|
||||
Loans Receivable
|
Residential, Industrial, Office, Retail and Storage
|
Discounted Cash Flow
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio
|
70.8%-79.2% (75.6%)
|
|
|
|
Equivalency Rate
|
6.0%-8.3% (6.9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
Asset Class
|
Valuation Technique(s)
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
Range (Weighted Average)
|
|
||||
Real Estate Properties and Joint Ventures
|
Office
|
Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow
|
Discount Rate
|
5.5%–8.0% (6.5%)
|
|
|
|
Terminal Capitalization Rate
|
4.5%–7.0% (5.5%)
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Income Approach—Direct Capitalization
|
Overall Capitalization Rate
|
3.8%–7.0% (4.8%)
|
|
|
|||
|
Industrial
|
Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow
|
Discount Rate
|
5.5%–8.9% (6.8%)
|
|
|
|
Terminal Capitalization Rate
|
4.5%–8.3% (5.5%)
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Income Approach—Direct Capitalization
|
Overall Capitalization Rate
|
4.0%–7.5% (5.0%)
|
|
|
|||
|
Residential
|
Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow
|
Discount Rate
|
5.0%–8.0% (6.1%)
|
|
|
|
Terminal Capitalization Rate
|
3.5%–6.5% (4.8%)
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Income Approach—Direct Capitalization
|
Overall Capitalization Rate
|
3.3%–6.0% (4.3%)
|
|
|
|||
|
Retail
|
Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow
|
Discount Rate
|
5.0%–10.5% (6.4%)
|
|
|
|
Terminal Capitalization Rate
|
4.3%–8.8% (5.2%)
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Income Approach—Direct Capitalization
|
Overall Capitalization Rate
|
3.8%–8.8% (4.7%)
|
|
||||
Mortgage Loans Payable
|
Office and Industrial
|
Discounted Cash Flow
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio
|
37.7%–69.5% (45.6%)
|
|
|
|
Equivalency Rate
|
3.7%–5.2% (3.9%)
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Net Present Value
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio
|
37.7%–69.5% (45.6%)
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk Premium Multiple
|
1.2–1.5 (1.3)
|
|
|
|||
|
Residential
|
Discounted Cash Flow
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio
|
28.1%–64.2% (38.6%)
|
|
|
|
Equivalency Rate
|
3.3%–3.6% (3.4%)
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Net Present Value
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio
|
28.1%–64.2% (38.6%)
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk Premium Multiple
|
1.1–1.5 (1.3)
|
|
|
|||
|
Retail
|
Discounted Cash Flow
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio
|
17.9%–56.0% (32.7%)
|
|
|
|
Equivalency Rate
|
3.1%–4.4% (3.8%)
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Net Present Value
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio
|
17.9%–56.0% (32.7%)
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk Premium Multiple
|
1.1–1.4 (1.2)
|
|
||||
Loans Receivable
|
Office, Retail and Storage
|
Discounted Cash Flow
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio
|
59.4%-77.3% (75.1%)
|
|
|
|
Equivalency Rate
|
4.2%-8.3% (6.2%)
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
Properties
|
|
Real Estate
Joint Ventures
|
|
Loans
Receivable
|
|
Total
Level 3
Investments
|
|
Mortgage
Loans
Payable
|
||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
282.6
|
|
|
$
|
80.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
363.7
|
|
|
$
|
86.2
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
185.1
|
|
|
$
|
125.2
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
311.5
|
|
|
$
|
15.9
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Real estate properties, at fair value
|
|
$
|
16,134.1
|
|
|
$
|
14,240.8
|
|
Other assets
|
|
460.3
|
|
|
337.1
|
|
||
Total assets
|
|
$
|
16,594.4
|
|
|
$
|
14,577.9
|
|
Liabilities & Equity
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Mortgage notes payable and other obligations, at fair value
|
|
$
|
5,035.3
|
|
|
$
|
3,995.7
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
262.5
|
|
|
150.7
|
|
||
Total liabilities
|
|
5,297.8
|
|
|
4,146.4
|
|
||
Total equity
|
|
11,296.6
|
|
|
10,431.5
|
|
||
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
16,594.4
|
|
|
$
|
14,577.9
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
||||||||
Operating Revenue and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Revenues
|
|
$
|
950.6
|
|
|
$
|
869.2
|
|
|
$
|
714.6
|
|
Expenses
|
|
487.1
|
|
|
426.9
|
|
|
365.0
|
|
|||
Excess of revenues over expenses
|
|
$
|
463.5
|
|
|
$
|
442.3
|
|
|
$
|
349.6
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||||||
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
%
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
%
|
||||||
Office
|
|
$
|
512.1
|
|
|
56.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
227.0
|
|
|
76.0
|
%
|
Industrial
|
|
176.4
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
||
Retail
|
|
101.6
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
||
Storage
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
37.6
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
||
Apartments
|
|
59.7
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
||
|
|
$
|
913.0
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
298.8
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
Number of Loans
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
%
|
|||
BBB
|
|
3
|
|
$
|
175.0
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
BB
|
|
5
|
|
561.5
|
|
|
61.5
|
%
|
|
B
|
|
5
|
|
170.2
|
|
|
18.6
|
%
|
|
NR
1
|
|
1
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
$
|
913.0
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Property
|
|
Interest Rate
and
Payment Frequency
(2)
|
|
Principal Amounts Outstanding as of
December 31,
|
|
Maturity
|
||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|||||||||
Mass Court
(1)
|
|
2.88% paid monthly
|
|
$
|
90.2
|
|
|
$
|
92.1
|
|
|
September 1, 2019
|
Red Canyon at Palomino Park
(4)
|
|
5.34% paid monthly
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
August 1, 2020
|
||
Green River at Palomino Park
(4)
|
|
5.34% paid monthly
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
August 1, 2020
|
||
Blue Ridge at Palomino Park
(4)
|
|
5.34% paid monthly
|
|
33.4
|
|
|
33.4
|
|
|
August 1, 2020
|
||
Ashford Meadows Apartments
|
|
5.17% paid monthly
|
|
44.6
|
|
|
44.6
|
|
|
August 1, 2020
|
||
The Knoll
(1)
|
|
3.98% paid monthly
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
December 5, 2020
|
||
The Corner
|
|
4.66% paid monthly
|
|
—
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
|
June 1, 2021
|
||
Ascent at Windward
|
|
3.51% paid monthly
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
January 1, 2022
|
||
The Palatine
(1)
|
|
4.25% paid monthly
|
|
77.4
|
|
|
78.8
|
|
|
January 10, 2022
|
||
The Forum at Carlsbad
(1)
|
|
4.25% paid monthly
|
|
87.3
|
|
|
88.9
|
|
|
March 1, 2022
|
||
Fusion 1560
|
|
3.42% paid monthly
|
|
37.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
June 10, 2022
|
||
The Colorado
(1)
|
|
3.69% paid monthly
|
|
89.9
|
|
|
91.7
|
|
|
November 1, 2022
|
||
The Legacy at Westwood
(1)
|
|
3.69% paid monthly
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
46.7
|
|
|
November 1, 2022
|
||
Regents Court
(1)
|
|
3.69% paid monthly
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
39.6
|
|
|
November 1, 2022
|
||
Fourth & Madison
(1)
|
|
3.75% paid monthly
|
|
198.2
|
|
|
200.0
|
|
|
June 1, 2023
|
||
Fourth & Madison
|
|
4.17% paid monthly
|
|
90.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
June 1, 2023
|
||
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue
(1)
|
|
3.70% paid monthly
|
|
327.0
|
|
|
330.0
|
|
|
June 1, 2023
|
||
Biltmore at Midtown
|
|
3.94% paid monthly
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
July 5, 2023
|
||
Cherry Knoll
|
|
3.78% paid monthly
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
July 5, 2023
|
||
Lofts at SoDo
|
|
3.94% paid monthly
|
|
35.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
July 5, 2023
|
||
1401 H Street, NW
|
|
3.65% paid monthly
|
|
115.0
|
|
|
115.0
|
|
|
November 5, 2024
|
||
Circa Green Lake
|
|
3.71% paid monthly
|
|
52.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
March 5, 2025
|
||
Union - South Lake Union
|
|
3.66% paid monthly
|
|
57.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
March 5, 2025
|
||
Holly Street Village
|
|
3.65% paid monthly
|
|
81.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
May 1, 2025
|
||
Township Apartments
|
|
3.65% paid monthly
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
May 1, 2025
|
||
32 South State Street
|
|
4.48% paid monthly
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
June 6, 2025
|
||
780 Third Avenue
|
|
3.55% paid monthly
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
August 1, 2025
|
Property
|
|
Interest Rate
and
Payment Frequency
(2)
|
|
Principal Amounts Outstanding as of
December 31,
|
|
Maturity
|
||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|||||||||
780 Third Avenue
|
|
3.55% paid monthly
|
|
$
|
20.0
|
|
|
$
|
20.0
|
|
|
August 1, 2025
|
701 Brickell Avenue
|
|
3.66% paid monthly
|
|
184.0
|
|
|
184.0
|
|
|
April 1, 2026
|
||
55 Second Street
(5)
|
|
3.74% paid monthly
|
|
137.5
|
|
|
137.5
|
|
|
October 1, 2026
|
||
1900 K Street, NW
|
|
3.93% paid monthly
|
|
163.0
|
|
|
163.0
|
|
|
April 1, 2028
|
||
501 Boylston Street
(6)
|
|
3.70% paid monthly
|
|
—
|
|
|
216.5
|
|
|
April 1, 2028
|
||
99 High Street
|
|
3.90% paid monthly
|
|
277.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
March 1, 2030
|
||
Total Principal Outstanding
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,688.1
|
|
|
$
|
2,238.6
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Adjustment
(3)
|
|
|
|
(80.1
|
)
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
||
Total Mortgage Loans Payable
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,608.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,238.3
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The mortgage is adjusted monthly for principal payments.
|
(2)
|
Interest rates are fixed. Some mortgages held by the Account are structured to begin principal and interest payments after an initial interest only period.
|
(3)
|
The fair value adjustment consists of the difference (positive or negative) between the principal amount of the outstanding debt and the fair value of the outstanding debt. See
Note 1—Organization and Significant Accounting Policies.
|
(4)
|
Represents mortgage loans on these individual properties which are held within the Palomino Park portfolio.
|
(5)
|
This mortgage is comprised of
three
individual loans, all with equal recourse, interest and maturity. The principal balances by loan are
$79.0 million
,
$45.0 million
, and
$13.5 million
.
|
(6)
|
On August 21, 2018, the Account sold a
49.9%
interest in the property and transferred the remaining
50.1%
to a joint venture investment. The debt was assumed by the buyer and new joint venture, respectively.
|
|
Amount
|
||
2019
|
$
|
107.2
|
|
2020
|
171.7
|
|
|
2021
|
20.0
|
|
|
2022
|
407.7
|
|
|
2023
|
686.4
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
1,295.1
|
|
|
Total maturities
|
$
|
2,688.1
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||||||||
Per Accumulation Unit Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Rental income
|
|
$
|
17.757
|
|
|
$
|
17.132
|
|
|
$
|
16.433
|
|
|
$
|
15.538
|
|
|
$
|
15.862
|
|
Real estate property level expenses and taxes
|
|
8.548
|
|
|
7.722
|
|
|
7.534
|
|
|
7.319
|
|
|
7.788
|
|
|||||
Real estate income, net
|
|
9.209
|
|
|
9.410
|
|
|
8.899
|
|
|
8.219
|
|
|
8.074
|
|
|||||
Other income
|
|
6.162
|
|
|
4.762
|
|
|
3.594
|
|
|
3.342
|
|
|
3.459
|
|
|||||
Total income
|
|
15.371
|
|
|
14.172
|
|
|
12.493
|
|
|
11.561
|
|
|
11.533
|
|
|||||
Expense charges
(1)
|
|
3.161
|
|
|
3.318
|
|
|
3.290
|
|
|
3.092
|
|
|
2.880
|
|
|||||
Investment income, net
|
|
12.210
|
|
|
10.854
|
|
|
9.203
|
|
|
8.469
|
|
|
8.653
|
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and mortgage loans payable
|
|
6.877
|
|
|
5.839
|
|
|
9.660
|
|
|
18.911
|
|
|
27.868
|
|
|||||
Net increase in Accumulation Unit Value
|
|
19.087
|
|
|
16.693
|
|
|
18.863
|
|
|
27.380
|
|
|
36.521
|
|
|||||
Accumulation Unit Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Beginning of period
|
|
398.329
|
|
|
381.636
|
|
|
362.773
|
|
|
335.393
|
|
|
298.872
|
|
|||||
End of period
|
|
$
|
417.416
|
|
|
$
|
398.329
|
|
|
$
|
381.636
|
|
|
$
|
362.773
|
|
|
$
|
335.393
|
|
Total return
|
|
4.79
|
%
|
|
4.37
|
%
|
|
5.20
|
%
|
|
8.16
|
%
|
|
12.22
|
%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Expenses
(1)
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
|
0.83
|
%
|
|
0.86
|
%
|
|
0.86
|
%
|
|
0.89
|
%
|
|||||
Investment income, net
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
|
2.72
|
%
|
|
2.41
|
%
|
|
2.37
|
%
|
|
2.68
|
%
|
|||||
Portfolio turnover rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Real estate properties
(2)
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|||||
Marketable securities
(3)
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|||||
Accumulation Units outstanding at end of period (millions):
|
|
60.7
|
|
|
61.3
|
|
|
62.4
|
|
|
60.4
|
|
|
57.9
|
|
|||||
Net assets end of period (millions)
|
|
$
|
25,842.6
|
|
|
$
|
24,942.6
|
|
|
$
|
24,304.7
|
|
|
$
|
22,360.0
|
|
|
$
|
19,829.0
|
|
(1)
|
Expense charges per Accumulation Unit and the Ratio of Expenses to average net assets reflect the year to date Account level expenses and exclude real estate property level expenses which are included in real estate income, net.
|
(2)
|
Real estate investment portfolio turnover rate is calculated by dividing the lesser of purchases or sales of real estate property investments (including contributions to, or return of capital distributions received from, existing joint venture and limited partnership investments) by the average value of the portfolio of real estate investments held during the period.
|
(3)
|
Marketable securities portfolio turnover rate is calculated by dividing the lesser of purchases or sales of securities, excluding securities having maturity dates at acquisition of one year or less, by the average value of the portfolio securities held during the period.
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|||
Outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Beginning of period
|
|
61.3
|
|
|
62.4
|
|
|
60.4
|
|
Credited for premiums
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Annuity, other periodic payments, withdrawals and death benefits
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
End of period
|
|
60.7
|
|
|
61.3
|
|
|
62.4
|
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||
Taconic New York City GP Fund
|
$
|
26.0
|
|
|
$
|
32.0
|
|
LCS SHIP Venture I, LLC
|
75.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
$
|
101.0
|
|
|
$
|
32.0
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Purchase Date
|
|
Ownership Percentage
|
|
Sector
|
|
Location
|
|
Net Purchase Price
(1)
|
||
Glen Lake
|
|
01/09/2019
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
$
|
54.8
|
|
1600 Broadway
|
|
01/10/2019
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Office
|
|
Denver, CO
|
|
109.1
|
|
|
The Theory
|
|
01/15/2019
|
|
97.00%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Raleigh, NC
|
|
63.0
|
|
|
Colony Industrial Portfolio
|
|
02/20/2019
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Industrial
|
|
Various, U.S.A.
|
|
137.0
|
|
|
Storage Portfolio III
(2)
|
|
02/22/2019
|
|
90.00%
|
|
Storage
|
|
Various, U.S.A.
|
|
17.9
|
|
(1)
|
The net purchase price represents the purchase price and closing costs.
|
(2)
|
The Account entered into a
90%
interest in a joint venture designed for future investment in storage properties. The Account's maximum potential investment is
$100.0
million and on February 22, 2019, the first storage property in Glen Burnie, MD, was acquired for
$17.9 million
(the Account's Share).
|
Property Name
|
|
Sales Date
|
|
Ownership Percentage
|
|
Sector
|
|
Location
|
|
Net Sales Price
(1)
|
Realized Gain/Loss on Sale
(3)
|
||||
1858 Meca Way
(2)
|
|
03/01/2019
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Industrial
|
|
Norcross, GA
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
(1)
|
The net sales price represents the sales price, less selling expenses.
|
(2)
|
Property held within Colony Industrial Portfolio.
|
(3)
|
No realized gain or loss was realized from the sale.
|
Borrower Name
|
|
Financing Date
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Sector
|
|
Maturity Date
|
Location
|
|
Loan Amount
(1)
|
||
SCG Oakland Portfolio
|
|
03/01/2019
|
|
4.25% + LIBOR
|
|
Office
|
|
03/01/2024
|
Oakland, CA
|
|
$
|
53.5
|
|
(1)
|
Loan Amount represents the Account's mezzanine loan receivable position.
|
Property Name
|
|
Financing Date
|
|
Ownership Percentage
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Sector
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
Location
|
|
Financing Amount
(1)
|
||
The Theory
|
|
01/15/2019
|
|
97.00%
|
|
3.94%
|
|
Apartments
|
|
01/15/2024
|
|
Raleigh, NC
|
|
$
|
31.3
|
|
Location/Description
|
|
Type
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Alabama:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Riverchase Village
|
|
Retail
|
|
$
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Arizona:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Camelback Center
|
|
Office
|
|
63.4
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
||
California:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
55 Second Street
|
|
Office
|
|
368.2
|
|
(1)
|
|
355.5
|
|
(1)
|
||
88 Kearny Street
|
|
Office
|
|
189.1
|
|
|
|
174.2
|
|
|
||
200 Middlefield Road
|
|
Office
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
|
61.4
|
|
|
||
12910 Mulberry Drive
|
|
Industrial
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
30700 Russell Ranch
|
|
Office
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Allure at Camarillo
|
|
Apartments
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
|
||
BLVD63
|
|
Apartments
|
|
164.0
|
|
|
|
162.1
|
|
|
||
Bridgepointe Shopping Center
|
|
Retail
|
|
125.0
|
|
|
|
124.5
|
|
|
||
Castro Station
|
|
Office
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
169.0
|
|
|
||
Centre Pointe and Valley View
|
|
Industrial
|
|
51.2
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
||
Cerritos Industrial Park
|
|
Industrial
|
|
153.1
|
|
|
|
142.0
|
|
|
||
Charleston Plaza
|
|
Retail
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
93.0
|
|
|
||
Frontera Industrial Business Park
|
|
Industrial
|
|
74.0
|
|
|
|
56.4
|
|
|
||
Great West Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
178.5
|
|
|
|
167.0
|
|
|
||
Holly Street Village
|
|
Apartments
|
|
152.1
|
|
(1)
|
|
148.0
|
|
|
||
Larkspur Courts
|
|
Apartments
|
|
146.0
|
|
|
|
143.7
|
|
|
||
Northern CA RA Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
93.3
|
|
|
|
87.4
|
|
|
||
Oakmont IE West Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
103.5
|
|
|
|
87.6
|
|
|
||
Oceano at Warner Center
|
|
Apartments
|
|
89.3
|
|
|
|
89.0
|
|
|
||
Ontario Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
421.8
|
|
|
|
398.6
|
|
|
||
Ontario Mills Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
|
58.5
|
|
|
||
Otay Mesa Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
29.4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Pacific Plaza
|
|
Office
|
|
116.5
|
|
|
|
115.2
|
|
|
||
Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
76.2
|
|
|
|
71.9
|
|
|
||
Rancho Del Mar
|
|
Apartments
|
|
92.5
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Regents Court
|
|
Apartments
|
|
104.0
|
|
(1)
|
|
99.1
|
|
(1)
|
||
Southern CA RA Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
143.4
|
|
|
|
138.0
|
|
|
||
Stella
|
|
Apartments
|
|
183.7
|
|
|
|
179.7
|
|
|
||
Stevenson Point
|
|
Industrial
|
|
61.3
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
||
The Forum at Carlsbad
|
|
Retail
|
|
225.0
|
|
(1)
|
|
221.0
|
|
(1)
|
||
The Legacy at Westwood
|
|
Apartments
|
|
144.0
|
|
(1)
|
|
143.0
|
|
(1)
|
||
Township Apartments
|
|
Apartments
|
|
90.5
|
|
(1)
|
|
89.8
|
|
|
||
West Lake North Business Park
|
|
Office
|
|
62.6
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
||
Westcreek
|
|
Apartments
|
|
55.0
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
||
Westwood Marketplace
|
|
Retail
|
|
142.0
|
|
|
|
131.9
|
|
|
Location/Description
|
|
Type
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||||||
Wilshire Rodeo Plaza
|
|
Office
|
|
$
|
312.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
327.8
|
|
|
Colorado:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Palomino Park
|
|
Apartments
|
|
348.0
|
|
(1)
|
|
329.7
|
|
(1)
|
||
South Denver Marketplace
|
|
Retail
|
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
72.7
|
|
|
||
Connecticut:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Wilton Woods Corporate Campus
|
|
Office
|
|
121.0
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
||
Florida:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
5 West
|
|
Apartments
|
|
62.2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
701 Brickell Avenue
|
|
Office
|
|
394.3
|
|
(1)
|
|
368.5
|
|
(1)
|
||
Broward Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
59.1
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
|
||
Casa Palma
|
|
Apartments
|
|
102.0
|
|
|
|
95.0
|
|
|
||
Fusion 1560
|
|
Apartments
|
|
82.0
|
|
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Lofts at SoDo
|
|
Apartments
|
|
66.7
|
|
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Orion on Orpington
|
|
Apartments
|
|
49.2
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
||
Publix at Weston Commons
|
|
Retail
|
|
74.6
|
|
|
|
74.8
|
|
|
||
Seneca Industrial Park
|
|
Industrial
|
|
117.5
|
|
|
|
108.8
|
|
|
||
South Florida Apartment Portfolio
|
|
Apartments
|
|
108.7
|
|
|
|
105.1
|
|
|
||
The Manor Apartments
|
|
Apartments
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
|
||
The Manor at Flagler Village
|
|
Apartments
|
|
137.1
|
|
|
|
148.1
|
|
|
||
The Residences at the Village of Merrick Park
|
|
Apartments
|
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
76.0
|
|
|
||
Urban Centre
|
|
Office
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
143.3
|
|
|
||
Weston Business Center
|
|
Industrial
|
|
97.8
|
|
|
|
92.8
|
|
|
||
Georgia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Ascent at Windward
|
|
Apartments
|
|
68.4
|
|
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Atlanta Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
32.4
|
|
|
||
Biltmore at Midtown
|
|
Apartments
|
|
70.4
|
|
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Shawnee Ridge Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
89.2
|
|
|
|
91.1
|
|
|
||
Illinois:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
32 South State Street
|
|
Retail
|
|
50.4
|
|
(1)
|
|
48.3
|
|
(1)
|
||
803 Corday
|
|
Apartments
|
|
94.2
|
|
|
|
94.5
|
|
|
||
Chicago Caleast Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
82.8
|
|
|
|
80.5
|
|
|
||
Chicago Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
28.7
|
|
(9)
|
|
100.3
|
|
|
||
Maryland:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cherry Knoll
|
|
Apartments
|
|
59.2
|
|
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Landover Logistics Center
|
|
Industrial
|
|
44.3
|
|
|
|
43.4
|
|
|
||
The Shops at Wisconsin Place
|
|
Retail
|
|
76.9
|
|
|
|
90.0
|
|
|
||
Massachusetts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
99 High Street
|
|
Office
|
|
506.4
|
|
(1)
|
|
502.1
|
|
|
||
501 Boylston Street
|
|
Office
|
|
—
|
|
(10)
|
|
505.2
|
|
(1)
|
||
Fort Point Creative Exchange Portfolio
|
|
Office
|
|
247.1
|
|
|
|
223.1
|
|
|
||
Northeast RA Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
40.9
|
|
|
||
One Beeman Road
|
|
Industrial
|
|
34.0
|
|
|
|
33.8
|
|
|
Location/Description
|
|
Type
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||||||
Minnesota:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
The Bridges
|
|
Apartments
|
|
$
|
64.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
62.4
|
|
|
The Knoll
|
|
Apartments
|
|
36.1
|
|
(1)
|
|
34.0
|
|
(1)
|
||
New Jersey:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
10 New Maple Avenue
|
|
Industrial
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
200 Milik Street
|
|
Industrial
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
||
Amazon Distribution Center
|
|
Industrial
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
110.0
|
|
|
||
Marketfair
|
|
Retail
|
|
104.3
|
|
|
|
102.9
|
|
|
||
South River Road Industrial
|
|
Industrial
|
|
102.5
|
|
|
|
87.8
|
|
|
||
New York:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
21 Penn Plaza
|
|
Office
|
|
317.8
|
|
|
|
261.2
|
|
|
||
250 North 10th Street
|
|
Apartments
|
|
151.0
|
|
|
|
163.1
|
|
|
||
425 Park Avenue
|
|
Ground Lease
|
|
461.0
|
|
|
|
457.0
|
|
|
||
430 West 15th Street
|
|
Office
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
145.8
|
|
|
||
780 Third Avenue
|
|
Office
|
|
418.7
|
|
(1)
|
|
427.0
|
|
(1)
|
||
837 Washington Street
|
|
Office
|
|
222.0
|
|
|
|
210.0
|
|
|
||
The Colorado
|
|
Apartments
|
|
254.9
|
|
(1)
|
|
256.2
|
|
(1)
|
||
The Corner
|
|
Apartments
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
251.0
|
|
(1)
|
||
North Carolina:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Centric Gateway
|
|
Apartments
|
|
70.0
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Oregon:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
The Cordelia
|
|
Apartments
|
|
41.7
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
||
Pennsylvania:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
1619 Walnut Street
|
|
Retail
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
||
South Carolina:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Greene Crossing
|
|
Apartments
|
|
75.1
|
|
|
|
67.2
|
|
|
||
Tennessee:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Southside at McEwen
|
|
Retail
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
48.2
|
|
|
||
Texas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
3131 McKinney
|
|
Office
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Beltway North Commerce Center
|
|
Industrial
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
||
Carrington Park
|
|
Apartments
|
|
65.1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Churchill on the Park
|
|
Apartments
|
|
71.3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Cliffs at Barton Creek
|
|
Apartments
|
|
46.7
|
|
|
|
45.9
|
|
|
||
Dallas Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
222.3
|
|
|
|
213.2
|
|
|
||
Houston Apartment Portfolio
|
|
Apartments
|
|
164.4
|
|
|
|
158.7
|
|
|
||
Lincoln Centre
|
|
Office
|
|
372.6
|
|
|
|
358.0
|
|
|
||
Northwest Houston Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
75.6
|
|
|
|
70.7
|
|
|
||
Park 10 Distribution
|
|
Industrial
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
||
Pinnacle Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
51.2
|
|
|
|
53.3
|
|
|
||
Pinto Business Park
|
|
Industrial
|
|
144.9
|
|
|
|
131.6
|
|
|
||
The Maroneal
|
|
Apartments
|
|
56.1
|
|
|
|
56.6
|
|
|
Location/Description
|
|
Type
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||||||
Virginia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
8270 Greensboro Drive
|
|
Office
|
|
$
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
50.3
|
|
|
Ashford Meadows Apartments
|
|
Apartments
|
|
107.1
|
|
(1)
|
|
107.3
|
|
(1)
|
||
Plaza America
|
|
Retail
|
|
116.3
|
|
|
|
117.0
|
|
|
||
The Ellipse at Ballston
|
|
Office
|
|
82.4
|
|
|
|
83.7
|
|
|
||
The Palatine
|
|
Apartments
|
|
122.0
|
|
(1)
|
|
123.2
|
|
(1)
|
||
Washington:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Circa Green Lake
|
|
Apartments
|
|
98.2
|
|
(1)
|
|
97.5
|
|
|
||
Fourth and Madison
|
|
Office
|
|
580.0
|
|
(1)
|
|
530.0
|
|
(1)
|
||
Millennium Corporate Park
|
|
Office
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
184.1
|
|
|
||
Northwest RA Industrial Portfolio
|
|
Industrial
|
|
43.0
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
||
Pacific Corporate Park
|
|
Industrial
|
|
52.8
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
||
Prescott Wallingford Apartments
|
|
Apartments
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
|
||
Rainier Corporate Park
|
|
Industrial
|
|
141.6
|
|
|
|
123.7
|
|
|
||
Regal Logistics Campus
|
|
Industrial
|
|
109.1
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
||
Union - South Lake Union
|
|
Apartments
|
|
114.0
|
|
(1)
|
|
111.0
|
|
|
||
Washington D.C.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue
|
|
Office
|
|
782.8
|
|
(1)
|
|
785.0
|
|
(1)
|
||
1401 H Street, NW
|
|
Office
|
|
209.5
|
|
(1)
|
|
201.1
|
|
(1)
|
||
1900 K Street, NW
|
|
Office
|
|
342.1
|
|
(1)
|
|
330.0
|
|
(1)
|
||
Mass Court
|
|
Apartments
|
|
166.1
|
|
(1)
|
|
171.0
|
|
(1)
|
||
The Ashton
|
|
Apartments
|
|
30.5
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
||
The Louis at 14th
|
|
Apartments
|
|
162.0
|
|
|
|
176.0
|
|
|
||
The Woodley
|
|
Apartments
|
|
196.0
|
|
|
|
191.0
|
|
|
||
TOTAL REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
(Cost $12,687.8 and $12,972.5)
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,531.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,742.7
|
|
|
Location/Description
|
|
Type
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||||||
California:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
CA—Colorado Center LP
Colorado Center (50% Account Interest)
|
|
Office
|
|
$
|
376.2
|
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
351.0
|
|
(2)
|
PC Borrower, LLC
Pacific City (70% Account Interest)
|
|
Retail
|
|
59.5
|
|
(2)
|
|
134.9
|
|
|
||
TREA 9625 Towne Center, LLC
9625 Towne Centre Drive (49.9% Account Interest)
|
|
Land
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
||
TREA Campus Pointe 1, LLC
Campus Pointe 1 (45% Account Interest) |
|
Office
|
|
153.7
|
|
|
|
143.0
|
|
|
||
TREA Campus Pointe 2 & 3, LLC
Campus Pointe 2 & 3 (45% Account Interest) |
|
Office
(5)
|
|
132.8
|
|
|
|
127.1
|
|
|
||
TREA Campus Pointe 4, LLC
Campus Pointe 4 (45% Account Interest) |
|
Office
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
Location/Description
|
|
Type
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||||||
T-C 1500 Owens, LLC
1500 Owens Street (49.9% Account Interest)
|
|
Office
|
|
$
|
78.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
77.5
|
|
|
T-C Foundry Square II Venture LLC
Foundry Square II (50.1% Account Interest)
|
|
Office
|
|
290.1
|
|
|
|
262.7
|
|
|
||
T-C Illinois Street, LLC
409-499 Illinois Street (40% Account Interest)
|
|
Office
|
|
223.9
|
|
|
|
209.3
|
|
|
||
Valencia Town Center Associates LP
Valencia Town Center (50% Account Interest)
|
|
Retail
|
|
140.5
|
|
(2)
|
|
138.8
|
|
(2)
|
||
Florida:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Florida Mall Associates, Ltd
The Florida Mall (50% Account Interest)
|
|
Retail
|
|
769.7
|
|
(2)
|
|
758.4
|
|
(2)
|
||
TREA Florida Retail, LLC
Florida Retail Portfolio (80% Account Interest)
|
|
Retail
|
|
156.0
|
|
|
|
150.6
|
|
|
||
West Dade County Associates
Miami International Mall (50% Account Interest)
|
|
Retail
|
|
170.3
|
|
(2)
|
|
166.0
|
|
(2)
|
||
Indiana:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
THP Park on Morton, LLC
Park on Morton (97% Account Interest)
|
|
Apartments
|
|
29.5
|
|
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Maryland:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
WP Project Developer
The Shops at Wisconsin Place (33.33% Account Interest)
|
|
Retail
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
||
Massachusetts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
One Boston Place REIT
One Boston Place (50.25% Account Interest)
|
|
Office
|
|
239.1
|
|
|
|
229.1
|
|
|
||
T-C 225 Binney, LLC
225 Binney Street (70% Account Interest)
|
|
Office
|
|
220.2
|
|
|
|
201.9
|
|
|
||
T-C 501 Boylston Street Member, LLC
501 Boylston (50.1% Account Interest)
|
|
Office
|
|
195.6
|
|
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Nevada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Fashion Show Holding I, LLC
Fashion Show (50% Account Interest)
|
|
Retail
|
|
819.1
|
|
(2)
|
|
844.4
|
|
(2)
|
||
New York:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
401 West 14th Street, LLC
401 West 14th Street (42.19% Account Interest)
|
|
Retail
|
|
48.4
|
|
(2)
|
|
46.4
|
|
(2)
|
||
440 Ninth Avenue Owner, LLC
440 Ninth Avenue (88.52% Account Interest)
|
|
Office
|
|
121.4
|
|
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
817 Broadway Owner, LLC
817 Broadway (61.46% Account Interest)
|
|
Office
|
|
28.0
|
|
(2)
|
|
23.0
|
|
(2)
|
||
MRA Hub 34 Holding, LLC
The Hub (95% Account Interest)
|
|
Office
|
|
59.2
|
|
(2)
|
|
56.9
|
|
(2)
|
||
RGM 42, LLC
MiMA (70% Account Interest)
|
|
Apartments
|
|
118.4
|
|
(2)
|
|
189.2
|
|
(2)
|
||
TREA 35th Street LIC Investor Member, LLC
Commerce LIC (97.5% Account Interest)
|
|
Industrial
|
|
0.6
|
|
(11)
|
|
58.2
|
|
|
||
Tennessee:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
West Town Mall, LLC
West Town Mall (50% Account Interest)
|
|
Retail
|
|
154.3
|
|
(2)
|
|
140.4
|
|
(2)
|
||
Texas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Four Oaks Venture LP
Four Oaks Place LP (51% Account Interest)
|
|
Office
|
|
344.6
|
|
(2)
|
|
338.7
|
|
(2)
|
Location/Description
|
|
Type
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||||||
THP Cabana Beach San Marcos, LLC
Cabana Beach San Marcos (97% Account Interest)
|
|
Apartments
|
|
$
|
23.0
|
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
THP The Forum at Sam Houston, LLC
The Forum - Sam Houston (97% Account Interest)
|
|
Apartments
|
|
17.6
|
|
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
THP West Campus, LLC
Aspen Heights (97% Account Interest)
|
|
Apartments
|
|
42.3
|
|
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Washington:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
T-C REA 400 Fairview Investor, LLC
400 Fairview (90% Account Interest)
|
|
Office
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
263.7
|
|
|
||
Various:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
DDRTC Core Retail Fund, LLC
DDR Joint Venture (85% Account Interest)
|
|
Retail
|
|
655.8
|
|
(2,3)
|
|
636.2
|
|
(2,3)
|
||
Simpson Housing LLP
Simpson Housing Portfolio (80% Account Interest)
|
|
Apartments
|
|
400.1
|
|
(2,3)
|
|
—
|
|
|
||
Storage Portfolio I, LLC
Storage Portfolio (66.02% Account Interest)
(8)
|
|
Storage
|
|
92.4
|
|
(2,3)
|
|
177.5
|
|
(2,3)
|
||
Storage Portfolio II, LLC
Storage Portfolio II (90% Account Interest)
|
|
Storage
|
|
120.4
|
|
(2,3)
|
|
91.8
|
|
(2,3)
|
||
TOTAL REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES
(Cost $5,030.9 and $4,534.5)
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,356.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,860.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS—0.6% and 0.5%
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Clarion Gables Multi-Family Trust LP (1.681% Account Interest)
|
|
$
|
30.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
126.7
|
|
|
||
LCS SHIP Venture I LLC (90% Account Interest)
|
|
129.7
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||||
Taconic New York City GP Fund, LP (60% Account Interest)
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
||||
Transwestern Mezz Realty Partners III, LLC (11.715% Account Interest)
|
|
0.4
|
|
(13)
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
||||
TOTAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS
(Cost $176.9 and $140.8)
|
|
|
|
$
|
175.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
142.4
|
|
|
TOTAL REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS
(Cost $5,207.8 and $4,675.3)
|
|
$
|
6,532.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,003.0
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Issuer
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
|||||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||||||||||
110,762
|
|
|
90,769
|
|
|
Acadia Realty Trust
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
||
46,535
|
|
|
31,513
|
|
|
Agree Realty Corporation
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
||||
94,479
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||||
2,986
|
|
|
2,309
|
|
|
Alexander's, Inc.
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
||||
146,953
|
|
|
103,464
|
|
|
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
53,951
|
|
|
Altisource Residential Corp.
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
||||
52,670
|
|
|
43,804
|
|
|
American Assets Trust, Inc.
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
||||
188,889
|
|
|
148,817
|
|
|
American Campus Communities, Inc.
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
||||
75,276
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
American Financial Trust, Inc.
|
|
1.0
|
|
(7
|
)
|
—
|
|
|
|||
357,614
|
|
|
263,720
|
|
|
American Homes 4 Rent
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
||||
606,653
|
|
|
462,615
|
|
|
American Tower Corp.
|
|
96.0
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Issuer
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
|||||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||||||||||
118,616
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Americold Realty Trust
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
||
213,704
|
|
|
171,065
|
|
|
Apartment Investment and Management Company
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
||||
301,399
|
|
|
231,041
|
|
|
Apple Hospitality Inc.
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
||||
69,576
|
|
|
47,395
|
|
|
Armada Hoffler Properties Inc.
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
27,462
|
|
|
Ashford Hospitality Prime Inc.
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
||||
108,956
|
|
|
88,009
|
|
|
Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
||||
190,742
|
|
|
150,694
|
|
|
Avalonbay Communities, Inc.
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
||||
30,596
|
|
|
24,509
|
|
|
Bluerock Residential Growth, Inc.
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
||||
213,492
|
|
|
168,560
|
|
|
Boston Properties, Inc.
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
||||
39,766
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Braemar Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||||
243,776
|
|
|
189,208
|
|
|
Brandywine Realty Trust
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
||||
418,058
|
|
|
336,302
|
|
|
Brixmore Property Group Inc
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
||||
173,572
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Brookfield Property REIT
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||||
12,485
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
BRT Apartments Corporation
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||||
123,044
|
|
|
99,633
|
|
|
Camden Property Trust
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
||||
115,194
|
|
|
85,789
|
|
|
CareTrust REIT Inc.
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
||||
64,018
|
|
|
48,438
|
|
|
Catchmark Timber Trust, Inc.
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
||||
239,329
|
|
|
185,540
|
|
|
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|||
112,105
|
|
|
92,124
|
|
|
Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc.
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
||||
65,187
|
|
|
49,866
|
|
|
Chatham Lodging Trust
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
||||
80,952
|
|
|
64,702
|
|
|
Chesapeake Lodging Trust
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
||||
47,817
|
|
|
32,933
|
|
|
City Office REIT Inc.
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
||||
21,288
|
|
|
15,330
|
|
|
Clipper Realty, Inc.
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
||||
661,676
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Colony Capital, Inc.
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
583,920
|
|
|
Colony Northstar, Inc.
|
|
—
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
||||
163,866
|
|
|
131,158
|
|
|
Columbia Property Trust Inc.
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
||||
23,436
|
|
|
17,855
|
|
|
Community Healthcare Trust, Inc.
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
||||
162,853
|
|
|
130,237
|
|
|
CoreCivic, Inc.
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
||||
16,269
|
|
|
12,695
|
|
|
Corenergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc.
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
||||
57,463
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Corepoint Lodging, Inc.
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||||
50,118
|
|
|
37,213
|
|
|
CoreSite Realty Corporation
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
||||
142,696
|
|
|
109,361
|
|
|
Corporate Office Properties Trust
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
||||
580,413
|
|
|
458,712
|
|
|
Cousins Properties Incorporated
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
||||
572,594
|
|
|
440,146
|
|
|
Crown Castle International Corporation
|
|
62.2
|
|
|
48.9
|
|
|
||||
255,847
|
|
|
197,633
|
|
|
Cubesmart
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
||||
144,491
|
|
|
98,521
|
|
|
CyrusOne Inc.
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
101,202
|
|
|
DCT Industrial Trust, Inc.
|
|
—
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
340,952
|
|
|
DDR Corp
|
|
—
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
||||
284,793
|
|
|
219,132
|
|
|
DiamondRock Hospitality Company
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
||||
284,543
|
|
|
223,448
|
|
|
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
||||
222,742
|
|
|
174,051
|
|
|
Douglas Emmett, Inc.
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
||||
493,225
|
|
|
388,940
|
|
|
Duke Realty Corporation
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
||||
86,054
|
|
|
46,776
|
|
|
Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Issuer
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
|||||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||||||||||
48,463
|
|
|
36,626
|
|
|
EastGroup Properties, Inc.
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
||
—
|
|
|
82,652
|
|
|
Education Realty Trust, Inc.
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
||||
196,612
|
|
|
139,642
|
|
|
Empire State Realty Trust
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
||||
102,222
|
|
|
68,867
|
|
|
EPR Properties
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
||||
110,827
|
|
|
85,048
|
|
|
Equinix Inc.
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
132,344
|
|
|
Equity Commonwealth
|
|
—
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
||||
118,255
|
|
|
89,456
|
|
|
Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
||||
495,921
|
|
|
390,235
|
|
|
Equity Residential
|
|
32.7
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
39,142
|
|
|
Escrow Winthrop Realty Trust
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
||||
47,818
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Essential Properties Realty
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||||
90,861
|
|
|
71,499
|
|
|
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
||||
168,808
|
|
|
133,620
|
|
|
Extra Space Storage, Inc.
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
||||
39,335
|
|
|
33,146
|
|
|
Farmland Partners, Inc.
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|||
100,845
|
|
|
78,850
|
|
|
Federal Realty Investment Trust
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
||||
171,124
|
|
|
130,114
|
|
|
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
266,222
|
|
|
Forest City Realty Trust A
|
|
—
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
||||
95,288
|
|
|
68,809
|
|
|
Four Corners Property Trust
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
||||
148,193
|
|
|
119,538
|
|
|
Franklin Street Properties Corp.
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
||||
66,846
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Front Yard Residential Corp.
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||||
279,615
|
|
|
221,037
|
|
|
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
674,285
|
|
|
General Growth Properties, Inc.
|
|
—
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
||||
164,774
|
|
|
134,715
|
|
|
GEO Group Inc./The
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
||||
45,390
|
|
|
36,337
|
|
|
Getty Realty Corp.
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
||||
40,600
|
|
|
30,560
|
|
|
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
||||
17,897
|
|
|
11,775
|
|
|
Gladstone Land Corporation
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
||||
27,913
|
|
|
14,323
|
|
|
Global Medical REIT, Inc.
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|||
97,753
|
|
|
73,715
|
|
|
Global Net Lease, Inc.
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
||||
134,722
|
|
|
102,459
|
|
|
Government Properties Income Trust
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
173,959
|
|
|
Gramercy Property Trust Inc.
|
|
—
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
||||
651,177
|
|
|
513,801
|
|
|
HCP, Inc.
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
||||
170,298
|
|
|
133,528
|
|
|
Healthcare Realty Trust Inc.
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
||||
285,255
|
|
|
221,345
|
|
|
Healthcare Trust of America
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
||||
50,946
|
|
|
45,394
|
|
|
Hersha Hospitality Trust
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
||||
140,879
|
|
|
111,471
|
|
|
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
||||
225,198
|
|
|
179,103
|
|
|
Hospitality Properties Trust
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
||||
1,014,135
|
|
|
799,202
|
|
|
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
||||
213,134
|
|
|
171,423
|
|
|
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
||||
123,683
|
|
|
93,383
|
|
|
Independence Realty Trust, Inc.
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
||||
88,878
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Industrial Logics Properties
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||||
16,729
|
|
|
130,841
|
|
|
Investors Real Estate Trust
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
||||
414,132
|
|
|
320,427
|
|
|
Invitation Homes, Inc.
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
||||
393,221
|
|
|
302,923
|
|
|
Iron Mountain Inc.
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
||||
1,500,000
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
iShares Dow Jones US Real Estate Index Fund
|
|
112.4
|
|
(7
|
)
|
121.5
|
|
(7
|
)
|
||
144,518
|
|
|
94,915
|
|
|
JBG Smith Properties
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
||||
136,455
|
|
|
106,012
|
|
|
Kilroy Realty Corporation
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Issuer
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
|||||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||||||||||
563,416
|
|
|
451,921
|
|
|
Kimco Realty Corporation
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
$
|
8.2
|
|
|
||
113,467
|
|
|
90,119
|
|
|
Kite Realty Group Trust
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
||||
116,496
|
|
|
91,259
|
|
|
Lamar Advertising Corporation
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
124,427
|
|
|
LaSalle Hotel Properties
|
|
—
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
||||
293,991
|
|
|
257,171
|
|
|
Lexington Realty Trust
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
||||
204,392
|
|
|
161,972
|
|
|
Liberty Property Trust
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
||||
63,299
|
|
|
50,130
|
|
|
Life Storage, Inc.
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
||||
54,350
|
|
|
42,489
|
|
|
LTC Properties, Inc.
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
||||
123,992
|
|
|
99,130
|
|
|
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
||||
44,471
|
|
|
29,800
|
|
|
Medequities Realty Trust, Inc.
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
||||
503,539
|
|
|
399,374
|
|
|
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
||||
157,147
|
|
|
123,965
|
|
|
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
||||
121,059
|
|
|
80,492
|
|
|
Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
||||
56,533
|
|
|
43,294
|
|
|
National Health Investors, Inc.
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
||||
219,159
|
|
|
165,743
|
|
|
National Retail Properties, Inc.
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
||||
78,758
|
|
|
49,957
|
|
|
National Storage Affiliates Trust
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
||||
97,013
|
|
|
90,062
|
|
|
New Senior Investment Group
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
||||
25,395
|
|
|
19,294
|
|
|
Nexpoint Residential Trust, Inc.
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
||||
60,527
|
|
|
61,800
|
|
|
NorthStar Realty Europe Corp.
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
||||
273,749
|
|
|
214,048
|
|
|
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|||
21,786
|
|
|
16,324
|
|
|
One Liberty Properties, Inc.
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
||||
192,190
|
|
|
152,483
|
|
|
Outfront Media Inc.
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
||||
289,253
|
|
|
225,256
|
|
|
Paramount Group Inc.
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
||||
276,143
|
|
|
159,738
|
|
|
Park Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
||||
186,399
|
|
|
75,337
|
|
|
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
||||
96,360
|
|
|
69,866
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
||||
250,372
|
|
|
195,747
|
|
|
Physicians Realty Trust
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
||||
177,784
|
|
|
159,189
|
|
|
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
||||
91,285
|
|
|
44,326
|
|
|
Potlatch Corporation
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
||||
54,653
|
|
|
39,774
|
|
|
Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc.
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
||||
865,465
|
|
|
577,161
|
|
|
ProLogis
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
37.2
|
|
|
||||
27,314
|
|
|
21,348
|
|
|
PS Business Parks, Inc.
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
||||
205,162
|
|
|
161,952
|
|
|
Public Storage, Inc.
|
|
41.5
|
|
|
33.8
|
|
|
||||
69,517
|
|
|
53,551
|
|
|
QTS Realty Trust, Inc.
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
104,106
|
|
|
Quality Care Properties
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
84,467
|
|
|
Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
||||
178,720
|
|
|
140,926
|
|
|
Rayonier, Inc.
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
||||
408,129
|
|
|
308,355
|
|
|
Realty Income Corporation
|
|
25.7
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
||||
210,244
|
|
|
163,631
|
|
|
Regency Centers Corporation
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
||||
155,276
|
|
|
118,002
|
|
|
Retail Opportunity Investment
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
||||
298,353
|
|
|
248,555
|
|
|
Retail Properties of America
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
||||
21,416
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Retail Value, Inc.
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||||
126,860
|
|
|
83,912
|
|
|
Rexford Industrial Realty Inc.
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
||||
239,679
|
|
|
185,465
|
|
|
RLJ Lodging Trust
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
||||
113,496
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
RPT Realty
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Issuer
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
|||||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||||||||||
61,126
|
|
|
48,519
|
|
|
Ryman Hospitality Properties
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
||
244,568
|
|
|
191,602
|
|
|
Sabra Health Care REIT Inc.
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
||||
10,996
|
|
|
11,006
|
|
|
Safety Income and Growth, Inc
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
||||
16,999
|
|
|
12,343
|
|
|
Saul Centers, Inc.
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
||||
154,833
|
|
|
131,401
|
|
|
SBA Communications Corporation
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
||||
121,549
|
|
|
69,474
|
|
|
Select Income Real Estate Investment Trust
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
||||
326,164
|
|
|
259,176
|
|
|
Senior Housing Properties Trust
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
||||
426,117
|
|
|
340,430
|
|
|
Simon Property Group, Inc.
|
|
71.6
|
|
|
58.5
|
|
|
||||
209,816
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Site Centers Corporation
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||||
113,961
|
|
|
105,521
|
|
|
SL Green Realty Corp.
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
||||
59,766
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Spirit MTA REIT
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||||
117,972
|
|
|
498,344
|
|
|
Spirit Realty Capital Inc.
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
||||
135,097
|
|
|
102,712
|
|
|
Stag Industrial, Inc.
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
||||
264,895
|
|
|
187,343
|
|
|
STORE Capital Corporation
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
||||
141,848
|
|
|
113,544
|
|
|
Summit Hotel Properties, Inc.
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
||||
116,162
|
|
|
83,430
|
|
|
Sun Communities, Inc.
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
||||
313,714
|
|
|
247,441
|
|
|
Sunstone Hotel Investors, L.L.C.
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
||||
126,963
|
|
|
101,087
|
|
|
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|||
81,759
|
|
|
64,816
|
|
|
Taubman Centers, Inc.
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
||||
80,363
|
|
|
58,066
|
|
|
Terreno Realty Corporation
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
||||
188,118
|
|
|
149,606
|
|
|
The Macerich Company
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
||||
73,743
|
|
|
54,543
|
|
|
Tier Inc.
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
||||
366,433
|
|
|
289,926
|
|
|
UDR, Inc.
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
||||
46,595
|
|
|
34,876
|
|
|
UMH Properties, Inc.
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
||||
231,999
|
|
|
182,231
|
|
|
UNITI Group, Inc.
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|||
18,151
|
|
|
14,449
|
|
|
Universal Health Realty Income Trust
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
||||
150,757
|
|
|
112,531
|
|
|
Urban Edge Properties
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
||||
42,533
|
|
|
31,959
|
|
|
Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc.
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
||||
491,993
|
|
|
388,195
|
|
|
Ventas, Inc.
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
||||
1,342,240
|
|
|
1,065,264
|
|
|
VEREIT, Inc.
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
||||
554,541
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Vici Properties, Inc.
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
||||
238,674
|
|
|
188,214
|
|
|
Vornado Realty Trust
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
||||
257,311
|
|
|
203,651
|
|
|
Washington Prime Group, Inc.
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
||||
110,436
|
|
|
85,659
|
|
|
Washington Real Estate Investment Trust
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
||||
165,849
|
|
|
132,066
|
|
|
Weingarten Realty Investors
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
||||
514,421
|
|
|
401,236
|
|
|
Welltower Inc.
|
|
35.7
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
||||
1,035,575
|
|
|
816,991
|
|
|
Weyerhaeuser Company
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
||||
54,425
|
|
|
38,883
|
|
|
Whitestone Real Estate Investment Trust B
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
||||
219,891
|
|
|
116,079
|
|
|
WP Carey Inc.
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
||||
154,344
|
|
|
118,158
|
|
|
Xenia Hotels & Resorts Inc.
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
||||
TOTAL REAL ESTATE-RELATED MARKETABLE SECURITIES
(Cost $1,274.7 and $991.0) |
|
$
|
1,415.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,238.0
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Issuer
|
|
Yield
(4)
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||||||||||
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.077%
|
|
1/9/2018
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
—
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.093%
|
|
1/10/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.115%
|
|
1/11/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.118%
|
|
1/19/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.038%
|
|
1/22/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
46.2
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.038%
|
|
1/23/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.038%
|
|
1/24/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.088%
|
|
1/29/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.079%
|
|
1/30/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
26.2
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.109% - 1.225%
|
|
2/7/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
26.2
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.145%
|
|
2/16/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.140% - 1.150%
|
|
2/20/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.140%
|
|
2/21/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.221%
|
|
3/7/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.221%
|
|
3/8/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.221%
|
|
3/9/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.303%
|
|
3/13/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
37.2
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.313%
|
|
3/19/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.303%
|
|
3/20/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.308%
|
|
3/22/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.318%
|
|
3/29/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.323%
|
|
4/2/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.313% - 1.323%
|
|
4/3/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
1.334%
|
|
4/9/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
||||
20.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
2.270%
|
|
1/9/2019
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
3.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
2.350%
|
|
2/6/2019
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
22.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
2.390%
|
|
2/13/2019
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
17.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes
|
|
2.350%
|
|
3/1/2019
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
Farmer Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.169%
|
|
2/1/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
||||
6.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Farmer Mac Discount Notes
|
|
2.440%
|
|
3/15/2019
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
9.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Farm Credit Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.380%
|
|
3/18/2019
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
18.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Farm Credit Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.480%
|
|
5/2/2019
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
20.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Farm Credit Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.530%
|
|
5/23/2019
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.069%
|
|
1/2/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.079%
|
|
1/3/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.068%
|
|
1/5/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.068%
|
|
1/8/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.058%
|
|
1/9/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.068% - 1.118%
|
|
1/10/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.089% - 1.108%
|
|
1/12/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
38.1
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.068%
|
|
1/16/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
38.1
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.094% - 1.118%
|
|
1/17/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Principal
|
|
Issuer
|
|
Yield
(4)
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||||||||||
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
30.2
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.063%
|
|
1/19/2018
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
30.1
|
|
—
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.134%
|
|
1/22/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.063%
|
|
1/25/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.063%
|
|
1/26/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.069% - 1.290%
|
|
1/29/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.225%
|
|
2/6/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
47.1
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.069% - 1.220%
|
|
2/9/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
47.1
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.140%
|
|
2/14/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.130%
|
|
2/16/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.306%
|
|
2/21/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.120%
|
|
2/26/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.120% - 1.186%
|
|
2/27/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.161% - 1.232%
|
|
3/2/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.212% - 1.313%
|
|
3/12/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.176%
|
|
3/13/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
27.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.318%
|
|
3/16/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.304%
|
|
3/27/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
47.4
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.304%
|
|
3/28/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.324%
|
|
4/11/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.359%
|
|
4/12/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.354%
|
|
4/16/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
39.2
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.365%
|
|
4/19/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.365%
|
|
4/20/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.365%
|
|
4/23/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.375%
|
|
4/24/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.371%
|
|
4/25/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
1.403%
|
|
5/4/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
||||
33.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.167% - 2.195%
|
|
1/11/2019
|
|
33.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
37.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.220%
|
|
1/14/2019
|
|
37.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
36.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.220%
|
|
1/15/2019
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
35.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.220%
|
|
1/16/2019
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
40.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.189% - 2.197%
|
|
1/18/2019
|
|
40.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
29.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.190%
|
|
1/23/2019
|
|
29.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
25.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.330%
|
|
1/28/2019
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
12.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.250%
|
|
1/29/2019
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
40.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.260% - 2.265%
|
|
1/30/2019
|
|
39.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
14.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.290%
|
|
2/8/2019
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
30.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.300% - 2.319%
|
|
2/11/2019
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
24.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.340%
|
|
2/15/2019
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
35.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.331%- 2.353%
|
|
2/19/2019
|
|
34.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
36.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.235% - 2.353%
|
|
2/20/2019
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
45.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.294% - 2.314%
|
|
2/22/2019
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
14.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.330%
|
|
2/25/2019
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
40.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.330%
|
|
2/26/2019
|
|
39.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
21.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.330%
|
|
2/27/2019
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
Principal
|
|
Issuer
|
|
Yield
(4)
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||||||||||
$
|
26.4
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.310%
|
|
3/1/2019
|
|
$
|
26.3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.316% - 2.355%
|
|
3/6/2019
|
|
31.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
40.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.370%
|
|
3/8/2019
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
37.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.432% - 2.437%
|
|
3/11/2019
|
|
37.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
40.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.420%
|
|
3/12/2019
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
40.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.400%
|
|
3/13/2019
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
10.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.360%
|
|
3/15/2019
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
30.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.360%
|
|
3/19/2019
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
12.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.430%
|
|
3/21/2019
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
22.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.410%
|
|
3/26/2019
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
25.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.370%
|
|
3/27/2019
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
40.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.460%
|
|
4/5/2019
|
|
39.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
40.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.470%
|
|
4/8/2019
|
|
39.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
50.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.440%
|
|
4/10/2019
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
24.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.430%
|
|
4/12/2019
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
14.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.480%
|
|
4/24/2019
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
10.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.470%
|
|
4/26/2019
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
87.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.473% - 2.511%
|
|
4/29/2019
|
|
86.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
24.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.480%
|
|
5/3/2019
|
|
23.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
18.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.510%
|
|
5/15/2019
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
40.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.510%
|
|
5/17/2019
|
|
40.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
30.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes
|
|
2.520%
|
|
5/22/2019
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
41.2
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.101% - 1.149%
|
|
2/2/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
41.2
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.101% - 1.139%
|
|
2/5/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.090%
|
|
2/6/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.100%
|
|
2/7/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
42.2
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.099%
|
|
2/12/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
42.1
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.099%
|
|
2/13/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.109%
|
|
2/14/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
39.5
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.120% - 1.130%
|
|
2/23/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.151%
|
|
3/5/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.151%
|
|
3/6/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.182% - 1.202%
|
|
3/14/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.182%
|
|
3/16/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.192%
|
|
3/19/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.202%
|
|
3/20/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
32.7
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.202%
|
|
3/21/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.182%
|
|
3/22/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.212%
|
|
3/23/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.223%
|
|
3/26/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.228%
|
|
4/4/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
57.7
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.228% - 1.269%
|
|
4/5/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
57.5
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.289%
|
|
4/6/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.325% - 1.330%
|
|
4/10/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes
|
|
1.325%
|
|
4/11/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
Principal
|
|
Issuer
|
|
Yield
(4)
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
|||||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|||||||||||||||
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
17.8
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
1.036% - 1.177%
|
|
|
1/2/2018
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
17.8
|
|
—
|
|
|
75.0
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
1.063% - 1.084%
|
|
|
1/4/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
75.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
1.128% - 1.236%
|
|
|
1/11/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
1.114%
|
|
|
1/18/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
71.0
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
1.132%
|
|
|
1/25/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
70.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
1.106%
|
|
|
2/1/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
93.0
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
1.075% - 1.077%
|
|
|
2/8/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
92.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
98.0
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
1.106% - 1.122%
|
|
|
2/22/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
97.8
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
81.0
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
1.060% - 1.117%
|
|
|
3/1/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
80.8
|
|
Principal
|
|
Issuer
|
|
Yield
(4)
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
|||||||||||||
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|||||||||||||||
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
154.0
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
1.374% - 1.433%
|
|
|
3/29/2018
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
153.5
|
|
—
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
1.440% - 1.636%
|
|
|
5/24/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
85.0
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
1.432%
|
|
|
6/7/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
84.5
|
|
||||
33.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.147% - 2.334%
|
|
|
1/3/2019
|
|
33.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
50.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.330%
|
|
|
1/8/2019
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
189.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.162% - 2.321%
|
|
|
1/10/2019
|
|
189.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
82.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.279% - 2.316%
|
|
|
1/15/2019
|
|
82.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
150.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.204% - 2.315%
|
|
|
1/17/2019
|
|
149.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
153.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.226% - 2.332%
|
|
|
1/24/2019
|
|
152.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
50.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.370%
|
|
|
1/29/2019
|
|
49.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
67.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.235% - 2.405%
|
|
|
1/31/2019
|
|
67.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
100.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.254%
|
|
|
2/7/2019
|
|
99.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
61.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.391% - 2.401%
|
|
|
2/12/2019
|
|
61.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
108.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.253% - 2.334%
|
|
|
2/14/2019
|
|
107.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
20.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.410%
|
|
|
2/19/2019
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
84.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.276% - 2.277%
|
|
|
2/21/2019
|
|
84.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
18.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.440%
|
|
|
2/26/2019
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
31.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.298% - 2.331%
|
|
|
2/28/2019
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
73.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.309% - 2.379%
|
|
|
3/7/2019
|
|
73.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
130.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.339% - 2.372%
|
|
|
3/14/2019
|
|
129.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
50.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.340%
|
|
|
3/21/2019
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
100.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.415%
|
|
|
3/28/2019
|
|
99.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
89.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.412% - 2.451%
|
|
|
4/4/2019
|
|
89.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
99.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.422% - 2.461%
|
|
|
4/11/2019
|
|
98.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
110.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.461% - 2.469%
|
|
|
4/18/2019
|
|
109.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
57.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.446% - 2.487%
|
|
|
4/25/2019
|
|
56.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
33.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.470%
|
|
|
5/2/2019
|
|
33.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
38.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.470%
|
|
|
5/9/2019
|
|
38.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
62.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills
|
|
2.508%
|
|
|
5/16/2019
|
|
62.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes
|
|
1.148% - 1.180%
|
|
|
1/31/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes
|
|
1.175% - 1.184%
|
|
|
2/15/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
48.0
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes
|
|
1.200%
|
|
|
2/28/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
47.9
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes
|
|
1.179%
|
|
|
3/15/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
||||
—
|
|
|
43.1
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes
|
|
1.333% - 1.378%
|
|
|
6/15/2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
||||
TOTAL UNITED STATES TREASURY SECURITIES
(Cost $2,038.1 and $1,015.3)
|
|
$
|
2,038.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,015.2
|
|
|||||||||||||
TOTAL OTHER MARKETABLE SECURITIES
(Cost $4,088.9 and $3,888.1)
|
|
$
|
4,088.7
|
|
|
$
|
3,887.5
|
|
|||||||||||||
TOTAL MARKETABLE SECURITIES
(Cost $5,363.6 and $4,879.1)
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,503.8
|
|
|
$
|
5,125.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
Fair Value at December 31,
|
||||||||
Principal
|
|
Borrower
|
|
Interest Rate
(6)
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|||||||
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
DJM Capital Partners Mezzanine
(12)
|
|
5.000%
|
|
7/12/2019
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
34.2
|
|
83.2
|
|
|
311 South Wacker Mezzanine
|
|
4.70% + LIBOR
|
|
6/7/2020
|
|
83.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
95.2
|
|
|
Blackstone RioCan Retail Portfolio Mezzanine
|
|
4.65% + LIBOR
|
|
6/9/2020
|
|
95.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
60.0
|
|
|
River North Point Mezzanine
|
|
4.30% + LIBOR
|
|
7/9/2020
|
|
60.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
20.0
|
|
|
Crest at Las Colinas Station Mezzanine
|
|
5.11% + LIBOR
|
|
5/10/2021
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
—
|
|
|
Simply Self Storage Portfolio Mezzanine
|
|
8.250%
|
|
9/6/2021
|
|
—
|
|
|
37.6
|
|
|||
125.0
|
|
|
State Street Financial Center Mezzanine
|
|
6.500%
|
|
11/10/2021
|
|
125.3
|
|
|
125.1
|
|
|||
20.0
|
|
|
Modera Observatory Park Mezzanine
|
|
4.34% + LIBOR
|
|
6/10/2022
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
19.7
|
|
|
Rosemont Towson Mezzanine
|
|
4.15% + LIBOR
|
|
9/9/2022
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
26.7
|
|
|
1330 Broadway Mezzanine
|
|
5.01% + LIBOR
|
|
8/10/2023
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
20.0
|
|
|
Aspen Lake Office Portfolio Mezzanine
|
|
8.250%
|
|
3/10/2028
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
95.0
|
|
|
Merritt on the River Office Portfolio Mezzanine
|
|
8.000%
|
|
8/1/2028
|
|
95.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
100.0
|
|
|
Charles River Plaza North Mezzanine
|
|
6.080%
|
|
4/6/2029
|
|
100.9
|
|
|
101.9
|
|
|||
176.4
|
|
|
Project Glacier Mezzanine
|
|
4.40% + LIBOR
|
|
11/9/2020
|
|
176.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
63.0
|
|
|
Great Value Storage Portfolio Mezzanine
|
|
7.875%
|
|
12/6/2023
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
TOTAL LOANS RECEIVABLE
(Cost $910.6 and $296.7)
|
$
|
913.0
|
|
|
$
|
298.8
|
|
|||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS
(Cost $24,169.8 and $22,823.6)
|
$
|
28,480.4
|
|
|
$
|
27,170.0
|
|
(1)
|
The investment has a mortgage loan payable outstanding, as indicated in Note 9.
|
(2)
|
The fair value reflects the Account's interest in the joint venture and is net of debt.
|
(3)
|
Properties within this investment are located throughout the United States.
|
(4)
|
Yield represents the annualized yield.
|
(5)
|
A portion of this investment consists of land for development.
|
(6)
|
Fixed interest rate loans are represented with a single rate. Variable interest rate loans are presented with their base spread and the corresponding index rate. All variable interest loans currently held by the Account use the one month London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") rate on U.S. dollar deposits as the index rate, as published by ICE Benchmark Administration Limited.
|
(7)
|
All or a portion of these securities are out on loan. The aggregate value of securities on loan is $67.4 million.
|
(8)
|
This investment was restructured on February 2, 2018, reducing the Account's interest in the joint venture from 75% to 66.02%.
|
(9)
|
A partial disposition of assets held by the portfolio was completed on May 1, 2018.
|
(10)
|
On August 21, 2018 the Account sold 49.9% of the property and transferred 50.1% into a joint venture investment.
|
(11)
|
The property investment held within the joint venture was sold on December 20, 2018. As of December 31, 2018, the joint venture remained in dissolution.
|
(12)
|
On September 4, 2018, concurrent with the payoff of a portion of the outstanding principal, the borrower elected a one year extension option as provided by the original loan. The maturity date and interest rate established by the extension option are July 12, 2019 and 5.0%, respectively.
|
(13)
|
All investments of the limited partnership have been previously disposed. As of December 31, 2018, the limited partnership remained in dissolution.
|
(1)
|
(A)
|
Distribution Agreement for the Contracts Funded by the TIAA Real Estate Account, dated as of January 1, 2008, by and among Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, for itself and on behalf of the Account, and TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional Services, LLC
4
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
(A)
|
Restated Charter of TIAA (as amended)
5
|
|
|
|
|
(B)
|
Amended Bylaws of TIAA
6
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
(A)
|
Forms of RA, GRA, GSRA, SRA, IRA Real Estate Account Endorsements,
2
Keogh Contract,
3
Retirement Select and Retirement Select Plus Contracts and Endorsements
1
and Retirement Choice and Retirement Choice Plus Contracts
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(B)
|
Forms of Income-Paying Contracts
2
|
|
|
|
|
(C)
|
Form of Contract Endorsement for Internal Transfer Limitation
7
|
|
|
|
|
(D)
|
Form of Non-ERISA Retirement Choice Plus Contract
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(E)
|
Form of Trust Company Retirement Choice Contract
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(F)
|
Form of Trust Company Retirement Choice Plus Contract
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(G)
|
|
|
(H)
|
|
|
(I)
|
|
|
(J)
|
|
|
(K)
|
|
(10)
|
(A)
|
Amended and Restated Independent Fiduciary Letter Agreement, dated as of February 21, 2018, between TIAA, on behalf of the Registrant, and RERC, LLC
12
|
|
|
|
|
(B)
|
Custodian Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between TIAA, on behalf of the Registrant, and State Street Bank and Trust Company, N.A.
8
|
|
|
|
(14)
|
|
|
(31)
|
|
|
(32)
|
|
(101)
|
|
The following financial information from the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Statements of Assets and Liabilities, (ii) the Statements of Operations, (iii) the Statements of Changes in Net Assets, (iv) the Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to the Financial Statements. Any other required schedule has been omitted because the schedule is not applicable to the registrant.**
|
*
|
Filed herewith.
|
**
|
Furnished electronically herewith.
|
(1)
|
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4(A) to the Account’s Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 29, 2004 (File No. 333-113602).
|
(2)
|
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to the Account’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 30, 1996 (File No. 33-92990).
|
(3)
|
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to the Account’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed May 2, 2005 (File No. 333-121493).
|
(4)
|
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1(A) to the Account’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Commission on March 15, 2013 (File No. 333-187309).
|
(5)
|
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(A) to the Account’s Registration Statement On Form S-1, filed with the Commission on April 22, 2015 (File No. 333-202583).
|
(6)
|
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(B) to the Account’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Commission on April 22, 2015 (File No. 333-202583).
|
(7)
|
Previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(C) to the Account’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and filed with the Commission on November 12, 2010 (File No. 33-92990).
|
(8)
|
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(B) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Account for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and filed with the Commission on March 14, 2013 (File No. 33-92990).
|
(9)
|
Previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(D)(1) and 4(D)(2) to the Account's Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Commission on March 21, 2017 (File No. 333-216849).
|
(10)
|
Previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(E)(1) and 4(E)(2) to the Account's Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Commission on March 21, 2017 (File No. 333-216849).
|
(11)
|
Previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(F)(1) and 4(F)(2) to the Account's Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Commission on March 21, 2017 (File No. 333-216849).
|
(12)
|
Previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Account's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on March 1, 2018 (File No. 33-92990).
|
(13)
|
Previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(G) to the Account’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on March 15, 2018 (File No. 33-92990).
|
(14)
|
Previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(H) to the Account’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on March 15, 2018 (File No. 33-92990).
|
(15)
|
Previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(I) to the Account’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on March 15, 2018 (File No. 33-92990).
|
|
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
TEACHERS INSURANCE AND
ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
|
/s/ Carol W. Deckbar
|
|
|
Carol W. Deckbar
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America and Chief Product Officer of TIAA Financial Solutions Product Group
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
/s/ R
OGER
W. F
ERGUSON
, J
R
.
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America and Trustee
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/
C
AROL
W
.
D
ECKBAR
|
|
Executive Vice President, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America and Chief Product Officer of TIAA Financial Solutions Product Group (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ O
LUSEUN
S. S
ALAMI
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ R
ONALD
L. T
HOMPSON
|
|
Chairman of the TIAA Board of Trustees
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ J
EFFREY
R. B
ROWN
|
|
Trustee
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ P
RISCILLA
S
IMS
B
ROWN
|
|
Trustee
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ J
AMES
R. C
HAMBERS
|
|
Trustee
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ T
AMARA
S
IMPKINS
F
RANKLIN
|
|
Trustee
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ L
ISA
W. H
ESS
|
|
Trustee
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ E
DWARD
M. H
UNDERT
, M.D.
|
|
Trustee
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ M
AUREEN
O’H
ARA
|
|
Trustee
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ D
ONALD
K. P
ETERSON
|
|
Trustee
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ S
IDNEY
A. R
IBEAU
|
|
Trustee
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ D
OROTHY
K. R
OBINSON
|
|
Trustee
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ K
IM
M. S
HARAN
|
|
Trustee
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ D
AVID
L. S
HEDLARZ
|
|
Trustee
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ M
ARTA
T
IENDA
|
|
Trustee
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
•
|
the only amounts that may be applied to the RCP would be those associated with administering a model(s) in a CPMS.
|
•
|
TIAA may transfer an employee’s Investment Account accumulations between the RCP and the corresponding accounts in the RC in accordance with the terms of the CPMS as agreed upon by TIAA and the contractholder under circumstances in which an employee begins or ceases participation in a model in a CPMS.
|
IGRS-CPMS-E2
|
|
Page E
1
|
IGRS-CPMS-E2
|
|
Page E
2
|
IGRS-CPMS-E2
|
|
Page E
3
|
•
|
the the only amounts that may be applied to the RCP would be those associated with administering a model(s) in a CPMS.
|
•
|
TIAA may transfer your Investment Account accumulations between the RCP and the corresponding accounts in the RC in accordance with the terms of the CPMS as agreed upon by TIAA and the contractholder under circumstances in which you begin or cease participation in a model in a CPMS.
|
IGRS-CRT-CPMS-E2
|
|
Page E
1
|
IGRS-CRT-CPMS-E2
|
|
Page E
2
|
T-GSRA-PAL-E1
|
|
Page E
1
|
T-GSRA-PAL-E1
|
|
Page E
2
|
•
|
Familiarize himself or herself with the disclosure requirements applicable to TIAA and the Funds as well as the business and financial operations of TIAA and the Funds;
|
•
|
Not knowingly misrepresent, or cause others to misrepresent, facts about TIAA and the Funds to others, whether within or outside TIAA and the Funds, including to the TIAA and the Funds’ internal auditors, independent Trustees, independent auditors, and to governmental regulators and self-regulatory organizations; and
|
•
|
Adhere to the standards and restrictions imposed by applicable laws, rules and regulations, including those relating to affiliated transactions, accounting and auditing matters.
|
•
|
Upon receipt of this Code, sign and submit to the Corporate Controller’s Area an acknowledgment stating that the Senior Financial Officer has received, read, and understands the Code;
|
•
|
Annually thereafter submit a form to the Corporate Controller’s Area confirming that the Senior Financial Officer has received, read and understands the Code and has complied with its requirements; and
|
•
|
Notify the Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer promptly if the Senior Financial Officer becomes aware of any existing or potential violation of the Code. Failure to do so is a violation of the Code.
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ Carol W. Deckbar
|
|
Carol W. Deckbar
|
|
Executive Vice President, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America and Chief Product Officer of TIAA Financial Solutions Product Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ Oluseun S. Salami
|
|
Oluseun S. Salami
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ Carol W. Deckbar
|
|
Carol W. Deckbar
|
|
Executive Vice President, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America and Chief Product Officer of TIAA Financial Solutions Product Group
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2019
|
/s/ Oluseun S. Salami
|
|
Oluseun S. Salami
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|