Item 1. Business.
Overview
Noble Corporation plc (formerly known as Noble Finco Limited), a public limited company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, is a leading offshore drilling contractor for the oil and gas industry. We provide contract drilling services to the international oil and gas industry with our global fleet of mobile offshore drilling units. We focus on a high-specification fleet of floating and jackup rigs and the deployment of our drilling rigs in oil and gas basins around the world. Noble and its predecessors have been engaged in the contract drilling of oil and gas wells since 1921. As of December 31, 2022, our fleet of 32 drilling rigs consisted of 19 floaters and 13 jackups.
On July 31, 2020 (the “Petition Date”), our former parent company, Noble Holding Corporation plc, a public limited company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales (“Legacy Noble” or the “Predecessor”), and certain of its subsidiaries, including Finco, filed voluntary petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the “Bankruptcy Court”) seeking relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). On September 4, 2020, the Debtors (as defined herein) filed with the Bankruptcy Court the Joint Plan of Reorganization of Noble Corporation plc and its Debtor Affiliates, which was subsequently amended on October 8, 2020 and October 13, 2020 and modified on November 18, 2020 (as amended, modified or supplemented, the “Plan”), and the related disclosure statement. On September 24, 2020, six additional subsidiaries of Legacy Noble (together with Legacy Noble and its subsidiaries that filed on the Petition Date, as the context requires, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions in the Bankruptcy Court. The chapter 11 proceedings were jointly administered under the caption Noble Corporation plc, et al. (Case No. 20-33826) (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). On November 20, 2020, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Plan. In connection with the Chapter 11 Cases and the Plan, on and prior to the Emergence Effective Date (as defined herein), Legacy Noble and certain of its subsidiaries effectuated certain restructuring transactions pursuant to which Legacy Noble formed Noble Cayman, as an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Legacy Noble and transferred to Noble Cayman substantially all of the subsidiaries and other assets of Legacy Noble. On February 5, 2021 (the “Emergence Effective Date”), the Plan became effective in accordance with its terms, the Debtors emerged from the Chapter 11 Cases and Noble Cayman became the new parent company. In accordance with the Plan, Legacy Noble and its remaining subsidiary will in due course be wound down and dissolved in accordance with applicable law. The Bankruptcy Court closed the Chapter 11 Cases with respect to all Debtors other than Legacy Noble, pending its wind down.
On September 30, 2022 (the “Merger Effective Date”), pursuant to a Business Combination Agreement, dated November 10, 2021 (as amended, the “Business Combination Agreement”), by and among Noble, Noble Cayman, Noble Newco Sub Limited, a Cayman Islands exempted company and a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Noble (“Merger Sub”), and The Drilling Company of 1972 A/S, a Danish public limited liability company (“Maersk Drilling”), Noble Cayman merged with and into Merger Sub (the “Merger”), with Merger Sub surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Noble. As a result of the Merger, Noble became the ultimate parent of Noble Cayman and its respective subsidiaries.
On October 3, 2022 (the “Closing Date”), pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, Noble completed a voluntary tender exchange offer to Maersk Drilling’s shareholders (the “Offer” and, together with the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement, the “Business Combination”) and because Noble acquired more than 90% of the issued and outstanding shares of Maersk Drilling, nominal value Danish krone (“DKK”) 10 per share (“Maersk Drilling Shares”), Noble redeemed all remaining Maersk Drilling Shares not exchanged in the Offer for, at the election of the holder, either A ordinary shares, par value $0.00001 per share, of Noble (“Ordinary Shares”) or cash (or, for those holders that did not make an election, only cash), under Danish law by way of a compulsory purchase (the “Compulsory Purchase”) which was completed in early November 2022. Upon completion of the Compulsory Purchase, Maersk Drilling became a wholly owned subsidiary of Noble.
For additional information on the Business Combination, see “Note 4— Acquisitions and Divestitures” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As a result of the emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases, Noble Cayman became the successor issuer to Legacy Noble for purposes of and pursuant to the Exchange Act. As a result of the Merger, Noble became the successor issuer to Noble Cayman for purposes of and pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) of the Exchange Act. References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
to “Noble,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer collectively to (i) Legacy Noble and its consolidated subsidiaries prior to the Emergence Effective Date, (ii) Noble Cayman and its consolidated subsidiaries on and after the Emergence Effective Date and prior to the Merger Effective Date, and (iii) Noble and its consolidated subsidiaries (including Noble Cayman) on and after the Merger Effective Date, as applicable.
Upon emergence, the Company applied fresh start accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 852 – Reorganizations (“ASC 852”). The application of fresh start accounting resulted in a new basis of accounting and the Company becoming a new entity for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, our financial statements and notes after the Emergence Effective Date are not comparable to our financial statements and notes on and prior to that date.
Finco was an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Legacy Noble prior to the Emergence Effective Date and a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Noble Cayman on and after the Emergence Effective Date and prior to the Merger Effective Date, and has been an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Noble on and after the Merger Effective Date. As of December 31, 2022, Noble’s principal asset is all of shares of Finco. Finco has no public equity outstanding. The consolidated financial statements of Noble include the accounts of Finco, and Noble conducts substantially all of its business through Finco and its subsidiaries. As such, the terms “Predecessor” and “Successor” also refers to Finco, as the context requires.
Strategy
Our business strategy is centered around efficient, reliable and safe offshore drilling to provide the best services for our customers. The Business Combination with Maersk Drilling created one of the youngest and highest specification fleets of global scale in the industry, with diversification across asset classes, geographic regions and customers. The Combined company has a track record of industry-leading utilization; coupled with an unwavering commitment to best-in-class safety performance and customer satisfaction. We strive to be a leader in industry innovation and first-mover in sustainability.
Our fleet consists predominately of technologically advanced units, equipped with sophisticated systems and components prepared to execute our customers’ increasingly complicated offshore drilling programs safely and with greater efficiency contributing to an overall reduction of our carbon footprint. We are primarily focused on the ultra-deepwater market and the harsh, and ultra-harsh environment jackup markets, which typically present more technically challenging conditions in which to operate.
We emphasize safe operations, environmental stewardship, and superior performance through a structured management system, the employment of qualified and well-trained crews and onshore support staff, the care of our surroundings and the neighboring communities where we operate, and other activities advancing our environmental sustainability, social responsibility, and good governance. We also manage rig operating costs through the implementation and continuous improvement of innovative systems and processes, which includes the use of data analytics and predictive maintenance technology.
Our organization prioritizes financial discipline, cash flow generation and returning cash to shareholders. We will focus on ensuring that our fleet of floating and jackup rigs meet the demands of increasingly complex drilling programs required by our customers as well as ensuring that we continue to maintain a strong financial position.
Climate change is an environmental, social and economic challenge facing everyone today. We are committed to continuous improvement and a sustainable energy future, supported by our efforts to protect the environment throughout our operations and safely provide reliable and efficient services to allow access to resources essential for human and economic prosperity. We actively look to partner with our customers to evaluate economic alternatives for reducing the carbon footprint of our drilling rigs. Oversight of our sustainability is at the Board level, with the Safety and Sustainability Committee assisting in that oversight role with respect to the Corporation’s sustainability policies and practices.
Contract Drilling Services
We report our contract drilling operations as a single reportable segment, Contract Drilling Services, which reflects how we manage our business. The mobile offshore drilling units comprising our offshore rig fleet operate in a global market for contract drilling services and are often redeployed to different regions due to changing demands of our customers, which consist primarily of large, integrated, independent and government-owned or controlled oil and gas companies throughout the world.
We typically provide contract drilling services under an individual contract, on a dayrate basis. Each contract’s final terms and conditions are the result of negotiations with our customers, and many contracts are awarded through a competitive bidding process. The following terms generally describe the key aspects of our contracts:
•contract duration extending over a specific period of time or a period necessary to drill a defined number of wells;
•payment of compensation to us (generally in US Dollars although some customers, typically national oil companies, require a part of the compensation to be paid in local currency) on a “daywork” basis, so that we receive a fixed amount for each day (“dayrate”) that the drilling unit is operating under contract (a lower rate or no compensation is payable during periods of equipment breakdown and repair or adverse weather or in the event operations are interrupted by other conditions, some of which may be beyond our control);
•provisions permitting early termination of the contract by the customer (i) if the unit is lost or destroyed, (ii) if operations are suspended for a specified period of time due to breakdown of equipment or breach of contract or (iii) for convenience with the payment of contractually specified termination amounts;
•provisions allowing the impacted party to terminate the contract if specified “force majeure” events beyond the contracting parties’ control occur for a defined period of time;
•payment by us of the operating expenses of the drilling unit, including labor costs and the cost of incidental supplies;
•provisions that allow us to recover our mobilization and demobilization costs associated with moving a drilling unit from one regional location to another which, under certain market conditions, may not allow us to receive full reimbursement of such costs;
•provisions that allow us to recover certain cost increases from our customers in certain long-term contracts;
•provisions that require us to lower dayrates for documented cost decreases in certain long-term contracts; and
•provisions that allocate responsibility and liability through indemnification provisions for risks related to personal injury, property damage or loss, environmental damages, damage to the reservoir and other matters.
During periods of depressed market conditions, such as the one we recently experienced for a number of years, our customers may attempt to renegotiate or repudiate their contracts with us although we seek to enforce our rights under our contracts. The renegotiation may include changes to key contract terms, such as pricing, termination and risk allocation.
For a discussion of our backlog of commitments for contract drilling services, please read Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations— Contract Drilling Services Backlog.”
Drilling Fleet
Noble is a leading offshore drilling contractor for the oil and gas industry. Noble owns and operates one of the most modern, versatile and technically advanced fleets of mobile offshore drilling units in the offshore drilling industry. Noble provides, through its subsidiaries, contract drilling services with a fleet of 32 offshore drilling units, consisting of 19 floaters and 13 jackups at the date of this report, focused largely on ultra-deepwater and harsh environment drilling opportunities in both established and emerging regions worldwide. Each type of drilling rig is described further below. Several factors determine the type of unit most suitable for a particular job, the most significant of which include the water depth and the environment of the intended drilling location, whether the drilling is being done over a platform or other structure, and the intended well depth. At December 31, 2022, our fleet was located in Africa, Far East Asia, the Middle East, the North Sea, Oceania, South America and the US Gulf of Mexico. Our fleet consists of the following types of mobile offshore drilling units:
Floaters. A drillship is a type of floating drilling unit that is based on the ship-based hull of the vessel and equipped with modern drilling equipment that gives it the capability of easily transitioning from various worldwide locations and carrying high capacities of equipment while being able to drill ultra-deepwater oil and gas wells in up to 12,000 feet of water. Drillships can stay directly over the drilling location without anchors in open seas using a dynamic positioning system (“DPS”), which coordinates position references from satellite signals and acoustic seabed transponders with the drillship's six to eight thrusters to keep the ship directly over the well that is being drilled. Drillships are selected to drill oil and gas wells for programs that require a high level of simultaneous operations, where drilling loads are expected to be high, or
where there are occurrences of high ocean currents, where the drillship's hull shape is the most efficient. Noble's fleet consists of 15 drillships capable of water depths from 10,000 feet to 12,000 feet.
Semisubmersible drilling units are designed as a floating drilling platform incorporating one or several pontoon hulls, which are submerged in the water to lower the center of gravity and make this type of drilling unit exceptionally stable in the open sea. Semisubmersible drilling units are generally categorized in terms of the water depth in which they are capable of operating, from the mid-water range of 300 feet to 4,000 feet, the deepwater range of 4,000 feet to 7,500 feet, to the ultra-deepwater range of 7,500 feet to 12,000 feet as well as by their generation, or date of construction. This type of drilling unit typically exhibits excellent stability characteristics, providing a stable platform for drilling in even rough seas. Semisubmersible drilling units hold their position over the drilling location using either an anchored mooring system or a DPS and may be self-propelled. Noble’s fleet consists of four moored ultra-deepwater semisubmersible drilling units.
Jackups. Jackup drilling units are designed to provide drilling solutions in depths ranging from less than 100 feet to as deep as 500 feet of water with drilling hookloads up to 2,500,000 pounds. Jackup rigs can be used in open water exploration locations, as well as over fixed, bottom-supported platforms. A jackup drilling unit is a towed mobile vessel consisting of a floating hull equipped with three or four legs, which are lowered to the seabed at the drilling location. The hull is then elevated out of the water by the jacking system using the legs to support the weight of the hull and drilling equipment against the seabed. Once the hull is elevated to the desired level, or jacked up, the drilling package can be extended out over an existing production platform or the open water location and drilling can commence. Noble’s fleet of 13 jackups consists of high-specification units capable of drilling in up to 500 feet of water.
The following table presents certain information concerning our offshore fleet at February 26, 2023. We own and operate all of the units included in the table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | | Make | | Year Built (1) | | Water Depth Rating (feet) (2) | | Drilling Depth Capacity (feet) | | Location | | Status (3) |
Floaters—19 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Drillships—15 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noble Bob Douglas | | GustoMSC P10000 | | 2013 | | 12,000 | | 40,000 | | Guyana | | Active |
Noble Don Taylor | | GustoMSC P10000 | | 2013 | | 12,000 | | 40,000 | | Guyana | | Active |
Noble Faye Kozack | | Samsung 120000 Double Hull | | 2013 | | 12,000 | | 40,000 | | US Gulf of Mexico | | Active |
Noble Gerry de Souza | | Samsung 120000 Double Hull | | 2011 | | 12,000 | | 40,000 | | Nigeria | | Active |
Noble Globetrotter I | | Globetrotter Class | | 2011 | | 10,000 | | 30,000 | | Mexico | | Active |
Noble Globetrotter II | | Globetrotter Class | | 2013 | | 10,000 | | 30,000 | | US Gulf of Mexico | | Active |
Noble Sam Croft | | GustoMSC P10000 | | 2014 | | 12,000 | | 40,000 | | Guyana | | Active |
Noble Stanley Lafosse | | Samsung 120000 Double Hull | | 2014 | | 12,000 | | 40,000 | | US Gulf of Mexico | | Active |
Noble Tom Madden | | GustoMSC P10000 | | 2014 | | 12,000 | | 40,000 | | Guyana | | Active |
Pacific Meltem | | Samsung 120000 Double Hull | | 2014 | | 12,000 | | 40,000 | | Las Palmas | | Stacked |
Pacific Scirocco | | Samsung 120000 Double Hull | | 2011 | | 12,000 | | 40,000 | | Las Palmas | | Stacked |
Noble Valiant | | Samsung 96000 | | 2014 | | 12,000 | | 40,000 | | Suriname | | Active |
Noble Venturer | | Samsung 96000 | | 2014 | | 12,000 | | 40,000 | | Ghana | | Active |
Noble Viking | | Samsung 96000 | | 2014 | | 12,000 | | 40,000 | | Malaysia | | Active |
Noble Voyager (6) | | Samsung 96000 | | 2015 | | 12,000 | | 40,000 | | Mexico | | Active |
Semisubmersibles—4 | | | | | | | | | | |
Noble Deliverer | | DSS21-DPS2 | | 2010 | | 10,000 | | 40,000 | | Australia | | Active |
Noble Developer | | DSS21-DPS2 | | 2009 | | 10,000 | | 40,000 | | Brazil | | Active |
Noble Discoverer (6) | | DSS21-DPS2 | | 2009 | | 10,000 | | 40,000 | | Guyana | | Active |
Noble Explorer (6) | | DSS20-CAM-M | | 2003 | | 3,281 | | 30,000 | | Azerbaijan | | Stacked |
Independent Leg Cantilevered Jackups—13 | | | | | | | | | | |
Noble Highlander (4) | | F&G JU-2000E | | 2016 | | 400 | | 30,000 | | Denmark | | Available |
Noble Innovator (5) | | MCS CJ70-150MC | | 2003 | | 492 | | 30,000 | | UK | | Active |
Noble Integrator (5) | | MCS CJ70-X150 MD | | 2015 | | 492 | | 40,000 | | Norway | | Active |
Noble Interceptor (5) | | MCS CJ70-X150 MD | | 2014 | | 492 | | 40,000 | | Denmark | | Active |
Noble Intrepid (5) (6) | | MCS CJ70-X150 MD | | 2014 | | 492 | | 40,000 | | UK | | Available |
Noble Invincible (5) | | MCS CJ70-X150 MD | | 2016 | | 492 | | 40,000 | | Norway | | Active |
Noble Mick O’Brien (4) | | F&G JU-3000N | | 2013 | | 400 | | 35,000 | | Qatar | | Active |
Noble Reacher (4) (6) | | MCS CJ50-X100 MC | | 2009 | | 350 | | 30,000 | | Denmark | | Active |
Noble Regina Allen (4) | | F&G JU-3000N | | 2013 | | 400 | | 30,000 | | Trinidad & Tobago | | Shipyard |
Noble Resilient (4) | | MCS CJ50-X100 MC | | 2008 | | 350 | | 30,000 | | UK | | Active |
Noble Resolute (4) | | MCS CJ50-X100 MC | | 2008 | | 350 | | 30,000 | | Netherlands | | Active |
Noble Resolve (4) | | MCS CJ50-X100 MC | | 2009 | | 350 | | 30,000 | | Denmark | | Active |
Noble Tom Prosser (4) | | F&G JU-3000N | | 2014 | | 400 | | 30,000 | | Australia | | Available |
(1) All of our current rigs were delivered to the Company new from the shipyard.
(2) Rated water depth for drillships and semisubmersibles reflects the maximum water depth for which a floating rig has been designed for drilling operations.
(3) Rigs listed as “active” are operating, preparing to operate or under contract; rigs listed as “available” are actively seeking contracts and may include those that are idle or warm stacked; rigs listed as “shipyard” are in a shipyard or preparing to enter a shipyard for construction, repair, refurbishment or upgrade; rigs listed as “stacked” are idle without a contract and have reduced or no crew and are not actively marketed in present market conditions.
(4) Harsh environment capability.
(5) Ultra harsh environment capability.
(6) Rig name reflects the newly assigned name planned for the legacy Maersk Drilling rig; the official vessel renaming process is ongoing.
Market
The offshore contract drilling industry is a highly competitive and cyclical business. Demand for offshore drilling services is driven by the offshore exploration and development programs of oil and gas operators, which in turn are influenced by many factors. Those factors include, but are not limited to, the price and price stability of oil and gas, the relative cost and carbon footprint of offshore resources within each operator’s broader energy portfolio, global macroeconomic conditions, world energy demand, the operator’s strategy toward renewable energy sources, environmental considerations and governmental policies.
In the provision of offshore contract drilling services, success in securing contracts is primarily governed by price, a rig’s availability, drilling capabilities and technical specifications and the drilling contractor’s safety performance record. Other factors include experience of the workforce, process efficiency, condition of equipment, operating integrity, reputation, industry standing and client relations.
We maintain a global operational presence and compete in many of the major offshore oil and gas basins worldwide with a primary focus on the ultra-deepwater market and the harsh, and ultra-harsh environment jackup markets. All our drilling rigs are mobile, and we may reposition our drilling rigs among regions for a variety of reasons, including in response to customer requirements. We compete in both the jackup and floating rig markets, each of which may have different supply and demand dynamics at a given period in time or in different regions.
The Business Combination with Maersk Drilling created one of the youngest and highest specification fleets of global scale in the industry, with diversification across asset classes, geographic regions and customers. The combined company has a track record of industry-leading utilization; coupled with an unwavering commitment to best-in-class safety performance and customer satisfaction. We strive to be a leader in industry innovation and first-mover in sustainability.
Over the last decade, the offshore drilling industry has experienced significant volatility and change, which has meaningfully impacted both the supply of, and demand for, offshore rigs. After several years of a significantly oversupplied rig market, industry conditions had started to gradually improve in 2019, which was evidenced by increasing utilization and improving dayrates. However, in the first half of 2020, this gradual recovery was abruptly halted as oil prices experienced concurrent supply and demand shocks. The supply shock was driven by production disagreements among OPEC+ members that resulted in a sudden and a significant oversupply of oil, and the demand shock by the onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic that resulted in a meaningful reduction in global economic activity and produced significant uncertainty among our customers. This had a negative impact on both utilization and dayrates for the offshore drilling industry and led to further financial challenges for many drilling and other service companies. However, by early 2021, oil prices returned to pre-pandemic levels and continued to rise throughout 2021.
During 2022, oil prices generally remained at levels that were supportive of offshore exploration and development activity. While the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict and related sanctions, inflationary pressures and the subsequent government and central bank efforts to curb inflation, recession concerns, and supply chain disruptions did create some uncertainty relating to future global energy demand, global rig demand increased in 2022.
This rise was the result of the combination of growing confidence in commodity prices remaining at or above current levels, heightened focus on energy security, recent multi-year underinvestment in the development and exploration of hydrocarbons, and relative attractiveness of offshore plays with respect to both cost and a carbon emissions perspective resulted in an overall increase in global rig demand in 2022. This had a positive impact on both utilization and day rates for certain of our rig classes.
The global rig supply has come down from historic highs as Noble and other offshore drilling contractors have retired less capable and idle assets. Concurrently, the incoming supply of newbuild offshore drilling rigs has diminished materially, with
several newbuild rigs stranded in shipyards. However, we expect many of these stranded newbuild rigs may make their way into the global market over the next few years.
Although the market outlook in our business varies by geographical region and water depth, we remain encouraged by the recovery in the ultra-deepwater floater market, with overall demand having increased from 2020 lows. Our customers continue to focus on the highest specification floaters, which represents the majority of our floater fleet. We have also experienced an overall increase in the global jack-up market, with the Middle East being the largest component of this increase.
As of the date of this report, the majority of our jack-up fleet is positioned in the North Sea. While we are starting to see some increased tender activity in the UK North Sea, overall activity levels remain subdued compared to historical levels. It is currently a similar story in the Norway ultra-harsh environment jackup market where current activity also remains below historical levels, despite the market being attractive to operators given it is characterized by low-cost and low-emission barrels.
The energy transition from hydrocarbons to renewables poses a challenge to the oil and gas sector and our market. Energy rebalancing trends have accelerated in recent years as evidenced by promulgated or proposed government policies and commitments by many of our customers to further invest in sustainable energy sources. Our industry could be further challenged as our customers rebalance their capital investments more towards alternative energy sources. However, at the same time, there continues to be a global dependence on the combustion of hydrocarbons to provide reliable and affordable energy. Low-cost and low-emission barrels are still necessary to meet energy needs, both current and future. Global energy demand is predicted to increase over the coming decades, and we expect that offshore oil and gas will continue to play an important and sustainable role in meeting this demand.
We expect inflationary pressures and supply chain disruptions to persist, and potentially accelerate, which has led or may lead to increased costs of services.
Significant Customers
During the three years ended December 31, 2022, we principally conducted our contract drilling operations in Canada, Far East Asia, the Middle East, the North Sea, Oceania, the Black Sea, Africa, South America and the US Gulf of Mexico. The following table sets forth revenues from our customers as a percentage of our consolidated operating revenues:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Successor | | | Predecessor |
| | | | | | Period From | | | Period From | | | | |
| | | | | | February 6, 2021 | | | January 1, 2021 | | | | |
| | | | | | through | | | through | | Year Ended | | |
| | | | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 | | | February 5, 2021 | | December 31, 2020 | | |
Royal Dutch Shell plc (“Shell”) | | | | 12.0 | % | | 13.3 | % | | | 30.0 | % | | 21.7 | % | | |
Exxon Mobil Corporation (“ExxonMobil”) | | | | 32.3 | % | | 39.1 | % | | | 29.8 | % | | 26.6 | % | | |
Equinor ASA (“Equinor”) | | | | 6.4 | % | | 3.1 | % | | | 5.2 | % | | 14.3 | % | | |
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (“Saudi Aramco”) | | | | — | % | | 9.8 | % | | | 13.9 | % | | 13.8 | % | | |
No other customer accounted for more than 10 percent of our consolidated operating revenues in 2022, 2021 or 2020.
Human Capital
In connection with the completion of the Business Combination with Maersk Drilling in October 2022, we increased the size of our combined workforce. As such, at December 31, 2022, we had approximately 3,800 employees, excluding approximately 2,000 persons we engaged through labor contractors or agencies. Approximately 80 percent of our workforce is located offshore. Certain of our employees and contractors in international markets, such as Norway and Denmark, are represented by labor unions and work under collective bargaining or similar agreements, which are subject to periodic renegotiation, and we consider our employee relations to be satisfactory.
For additional information, please read Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors—Risk Related to Our Business and Operations—Unionization efforts, labor interruptions and labor regulations could have a material adverse effect on our operations.”
Our compliance program is focused on ensuring adherence with high ethical standards and applicable laws and setting the tone for an ethical business practices and work environment throughout the Company. Noble’s commitment to a strong compliance culture is fundamental to who we are as a leading offshore drilling contractor. We are also committed to uphold
our Core Value of respecting the dignity and worth of all employees and are committed to advancing a more diverse and inclusive workplace. The Noble Code, Noble’s code of business conduct and ethics (the “Code of Conduct”), exemplifies the foundation of our commitments to our Core Values of safety, environmental stewardship, honesty and integrity, respect and performance. The Code of Conduct also includes our responsibility and commitment to follow all applicable laws as well as our own internal policies, and extends requirements to any supplier or third party who works with Noble to comply with similar fundamental principles.
Operating our business in a socially responsible way is integral to our identity. Internally, our employee-focused programs, such as training and continuing education, our promotion and advancement program, diversity, equity, and inclusion, recruitment initiatives, and retirement and benefits, are key to our commitment to the personal and professional growth of our workforce. Externally, our dedication is evidenced by our affiliations and how we contribute to and invest in the communities where we operate.
Recruitment and Promotions. We value a healthy culture of ingenuity and adaptability where everyone has an equal opportunity to thrive. We recognize that an inclusive and diverse workforce is key to the advancement and retention of the best qualified people leading to strong innovation and our continued success. We are committed to a policy of recruitment and promotion based upon job qualifications, performance and merit without discrimination.
Safety and Environmental Stewardship. Noble is committed to operating with excellent health, safety and environmental (“HSE”) performance as part of our business strategy in order to add further value for employees, customers and shareholders. Safety and environmental stewardship are cornerstones of who we are, what we stand for and what we do every day to deliver a high-quality operation. All personnel, regardless of job or position onboard our vessels or at any Noble facility, has the authorization and obligation to immediately stop any unsafe act, practice or job that poses an unaddressed or unreasonable risk or danger to people or the environment. Noble’s pursuit of exceptional HSE performance begins with our strong corporate culture and by starting SAFE every day: one tour, one task and one person at a time. SAFE is an acronym for the phrase: follow Standards, be Accountable, stay Focused, achieve Excellence. Daily, the crew onboard each rig work together to achieve specific safety and environmental objectives and if all objectives are met, then the day is counted as a SAFE Day. Under our SAFE Day program, in 2022, our rigs achieved the SAFE objectives 98.4% of available days, which is a slight decrease over 2021 performance. As of December 31, 2022, this metric was only available to vessels owned by Noble prior to the Business Combination with Maersk Drilling, and is being phased in across the vessels acquired as part of the Business Combination. When integration activities are complete, all current Noble vessels will be utilizing this program.
Training and Continuing Education. We place considerable value on the training and development of our employees and maintain a practice of keeping them informed on matters affecting them, as well as on the performance of the Company. Accordingly, we conduct formal and informal meetings with employees, regular executive-led podcasts, issue periodic publications of Company activities and other matters of interest to the Company’s OneNoble app and offer a variety of training, including in-house through NobleAdvances, our state-of-the-art training facility in Sugar Land, Texas. NobleAdvances and our experienced team of instructors have provided introductory level training, intermediate and advanced well-specific scenario training for Noble employees, industry professionals and third party industry service providers.
NobleAdvances allows us to deliver Noble-specific training that includes our policies, procedures and culture. Incorporating this into our well control and cyber training has proven to be important to training. The commitment to keep the center running and provide world-class training throughout the downturn has shown our clients that our commitment to safety and excellence is the Noble way. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we developed and incorporated virtual and worksite training courses into our existing infrastructure, some of which are facilitated through our rig-based leadership and are accredited through the International Association of Drilling Contractors.
Governmental Regulations and Environmental Matters
Our environmental commitment is to protect our world and its resources in a manner consistent with our Mission and Core Values. With our experience and procedural discipline, we are able to operate with excellence, and deliver efficient and reliable services for the benefit of our customers as well as our community, which includes everyone from our investors, to our workers and the communities where we live and operate.
Political developments and numerous governmental regulations, which may relate directly or indirectly to the contract drilling industry, may affect different aspects of our operations. Our contract drilling operations are subject to various laws and regulations in countries in which we operate, including laws and regulations relating to the equipping, supplying and operation of drilling units; environmental protection and related recordkeeping; health and safety of personnel, maintaining
an effective safety management systems; the reduction of air emission gasses that are attributed to the destabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere (commonly referred to as greenhouse gases); economic sanctions; currency conversions and repatriation; oil and gas exploration and development; taxation of capital equipment, taxation of offshore earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel; employee benefits and use of local employees, content and suppliers by foreign contractors. A number of countries actively regulate and control the ownership of concessions and companies holding concessions, the exportation of oil and gas and other aspects of the oil and gas industries in their countries. In addition, government actions, including initiatives by OPEC and OPEC+, may continue to contribute to oil price volatility. In some areas of the world, this government activity has adversely affected the amount of exploration and development work done by oil and gas companies and influenced their need for offshore drilling services, and likely will continue to do so.
The regulations applicable to our operations include provisions that regulate the discharge or release of materials into the environment or require remediation of contamination under certain circumstances. Many of the countries in whose waters we operate from time to time regulate the discharge of oil and other potential contaminants in connection with drilling and marine operations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations, or failure to obtain or comply with permits, may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, imposition of remedial requirements, or the imposition of injunctions to force future compliance. Although these requirements impact the oil and gas and offshore energy services industries, generally, they do not appear to affect us in any material respect that is different, or to any materially greater or lesser extent, than other companies in the offshore energy services industry. However, our business and prospects could be adversely affected by regulatory activity that prohibits or restricts our customers’ exploration and production activities, resulting in reduced demand for our services or imposing environmental protection requirements that result in increased costs to us, our customers or the oil and natural gas industry in general.
The following is a summary of some of the existing laws and regulations that apply in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Europe, which serves as an example of the various laws and regulations to which we are subject. While laws vary widely in each jurisdiction, each of the laws and regulations summarized below addresses regulatory issues similar to those in most of the other jurisdictions in which we operate.
Offshore Regulation and Safety. The United States Congress, the US Department of Interior, through the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (“BOEM”) and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (“BSEE”), the US Department of Homeland Security, through the United States Coast Guard (“USCG”), and the US Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) undertook an aggressive overhaul of the offshore oil and natural gas related regulatory processes in response to the Macondo well blowout incident in April 2010, which has significantly impacted oil and gas development and operational requirements in the US Gulf of Mexico. Such actions by the US government have, on occasion, served as a leading indicator for similar regulatory developments or requirements by other countries where, from time to time, new rules, regulations and requirements in the United States and in other countries have been proposed and implemented that materially limit or prohibit, and increase the cost of, offshore drilling and related operations. Other similar regulations impact certain operational requirements on rigs and govern liability for vessel or cargo loss, or damage to life, property, or the marine environment. See Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors —Regulatory and Legal Risks—Changes in, compliance with, or our failure to comply with the certain laws and regulations may negatively impact our operations and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations” and “Risk Factors—Regulatory and Legal Risks—Governmental laws and regulations may add to our costs, result in delays, or limit our drilling activity” for additional information.
Spills and Releases. The US Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”), the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act in the United States (“CERCLA”), and similar regulations, including but not limited to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (“MARPOL”), adopted by the International Maritime Organization (“IMO”), as enforced in the United States through the domestic implementing laws, such as the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships, impose certain operational requirements on offshore rigs operating in the United States and govern liability for leaks, spills and blowouts involving pollutants. OPA imposes strict, joint and several liabilities on “responsible parties” for damages, including natural resource damages, resulting from oil spills into or upon navigable waters, adjoining shorelines or in the exclusive economic zone of the United States. A “responsible party” includes the owner or operator of an offshore facility and the lessee or permit holder of the area in which an offshore facility is located. CERCLA and similar state and foreign laws and regulations, impose joint and several liabilities, without regard to fault or the legality of the original act, on certain classes of persons that contributed to the release of a “hazardous substance” into the environment. In the course of our ordinary operations, we may generate waste that may fall within the scope of CERCLA's definition of a “hazardous substance.” However, we have to-date not received any notification that we are, or may be, potentially responsible for cleanup costs under CERCLA.
Regulations under OPA require owners and operators of rigs in United States waters to maintain certain levels of financial responsibility. The failure to comply with OPA’s requirements may subject a responsible party to civil, criminal, or administrative enforcement actions. We are not aware of any action or event that would subject us to liability under OPA, and we believe that compliance with OPA’s financial assurance and other operating requirements will not have a material impact on our operations or financial condition.
Waste Handling. The US Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), and similar state, local and foreign laws and regulations govern the management of wastes, including the treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous wastes. RCRA imposes stringent operating requirements, and liability for failure to meet such requirements, on a person who is either a “generator” or “transporter” of hazardous waste or an “owner” or “operator” of a hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facility. RCRA and many state counterparts specifically exclude from the definition of hazardous waste drilling fluids, produced waters, and other wastes associated with the exploration, development, or production of crude oil and natural gas. As a result, our operations generate minimal quantities of RCRA hazardous wastes. We do not believe the current costs of managing our wastes, as they are presently classified, to be significant. However, any repeal or modification of this or similar exemption in similar state statutes, would increase the volume of hazardous waste we are required to manage and dispose of, and would cause us, as well as our competitors, to incur increased operating expenses with respect to our US operations.
Water Discharges. The US Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended, also known as the “Clean Water Act,” and similar state laws and regulations impose restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants into federal and state waters. These laws also regulate the discharge of cooling water in process areas. Pursuant to these laws and regulations, we are required to obtain and maintain approvals or permits, or report information related to the discharge of wastewater and cooling water. In addition, the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments requires ships to manage their ballast water to remove, render harmless, or avoid the uptake or discharge of aquatic organisms and pathogens within ballast water and sediments. The US Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 and the US National Invasive Species Act (NISA 1996) have served as the foundation for requirements for ballast water management as well as supplemental ballast water requirements, which includes limits and, in some cases, water treatment requirements applicable to specific discharge streams, such as deck runoff, bilge water and gray water. Further, in 2018 the US Vessel Incidental Discharge Act was signed into law, which was intended to restructure how the EPA and USCG would regulate incidental discharges, primarily from commercial vessels, into waters of the United States and the contiguous zone by adding a new subsection (p) to Section 312 of the Clean Water Act. In 2020, the EPA published a proposed rule that would establish discharge standards for a range of vessels, including mobile offshore drilling units. With limited exceptions, proposed standards are anticipated to be at least as stringent as National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) Vessel General Permit (“VGP”) requirements established under the Clean Water Act. The regulations anticipated from the USCG may also include requirements governing the design, construction, testing, approval, installation, and use of devices to achieve EPA standards of performance. In the interim, the NPDES and VGP requirements remain in place and we do not anticipate that compliance with these new laws and regulations will cause a material impact on our operations or financial condition.
Air Emissions. The US Clean Air Act and the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act authorizes the Department of the Interior (DOI) to regulate US Outer Continental Shelf (“OCS”) activities authorized by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, and the EPA has air quality jurisdiction over all other parts of the US OCS. In addition, associated state laws and regulations restrict certain air emissions from many sources, including oil and natural gas operations. Federal and state regulatory agencies can impose administrative, civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance with air permits or other requirements of the Clean Air Act and associated state laws and regulations. In general, we believe that compliance with the Clean Air Act and corresponding regulations, and similar state laws and regulations will not have a material impact on our operations or financial condition.
Climate Change. Climate change is an environmental, social and economic challenge facing everyone today. We are committed to continuous improvement and a sustainable energy future, supported by our efforts to protect the environment throughout our operations and safely provide reliable and efficient services to allow access to resources essential for human and economic prosperity. There is ongoing attention concerning the global climate and the effect of greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. Various regulators have proposed or adopted rules requiring the monitoring and reporting of GHG emissions from specified sources in the United States, including, among other things, certain offshore activities relating to oil and gas production.
Moreover, in 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which operationalized the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change set binding emission reduction targets
against 1990 levels for 37 countries (including the US and UK) and the European Union. In 2015, the United Nations (“U.N.”) Climate Change Conference in Paris resulted in an agreement (“Paris Agreement”) to which the US returned as a party in February 2021. The Paris Agreement required countries to review and “represent a progression” in their nationally determined contributions every five years beginning in 2020. The various international conventions and agreements are expected to result in additional laws and regulations or changes to existing laws and regulations, including energy conservation incentives, in the US, UK, Denmark, and other countries where we have a presence and could have a material adverse effect on our business and the business of our customers. For additional information, see Part I, Item1A, “Risk Factors—Regulatory and Legal Risks— Governmental laws and regulations may add to our costs, result in delays, or limit our drilling activity”.
The United Kingdom (“UK”) and countries in the European Union (“EU”) implemented an Emissions Trading Systems (“ETS”), and in July 2022, the Council of the EU adopted a proposal to revise the EU ETS Directive to include maritime transport activities; however, while negotiations are ongoing so the final text with the inclusion of shipping in the EU ETS has not yet been adopted and is subject to change, the expected results could have a material adverse effect on our business and the business of our customers.
The cost of compliance with the UK ETS and the EU ETS can be expected to increase over time. UK and additional EU member state climate change legislation may result in potentially material capital expenditures.
Combustion of ultra-low sulfur fuel oil aboard all of our vessels worldwide (Scope 1) is the Company’s primary source of GHG emissions, which includes carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide. Based upon the emissions calculation factor provided by the Environmental and Emissions Monitoring System (“EEMS”), for our vessels worldwide we estimate our carbon dioxide equivalent (“CO2e”) gas emissions for the year ended December 31, 2022 to be 597,706 tons and our operational intensity measure of tons of CO2e gas emissions per contract day for the year ended December 31, 2022 to be 94 tons per contract day.
In 2020, the scope of reporting of energy, GHG and other emissions changed from a financial scope to an operational scope.
Our Scope 1 CO2e gas emissions reporting has been prepared with reference to the UK Companies Act 2006 Regulations 2013, the Environmental Reporting Guidelines (June 2013) issued by the Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs, the World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard Revised and the International Organization for Standardization (“ISO”) 14064-1, “Specification with guidance at the organizational level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals (2018).”
Worker Safety. The US Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”) and other similar laws and regulations govern the protection of the health and safety of employees. The OSHA hazard communication standard, EPA community right-to-know regulations under Title III of CERCLA and similar state statutes require that information be maintained about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and that this information be provided to employees, state and local governments and citizens. EU member states have also adopted regulations pursuant to EU Directive 2013/30/EU, on the safety of offshore oil and gas operations within the exclusive economic zone (which can extend up to 200 nautical miles from a coast) or the continental shelf. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with OSHA requirements and EU directive 2013/30/EU (as well as the extensive current health and safety regimes implemented in the member states in which we operate), but future developments could require the Company to incur significant costs to comply with the directive's implementation.
International Regulatory Regime. The IMO provides international regulations governing shipping and international maritime trade. IMO regulations have been widely adopted by U.N. member countries, and in some jurisdictions in which we operate, these regulations have been expanded upon. The requirements contained in the International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention, or ISM Code, promulgated by the IMO, govern much of our drilling operations. Among other requirements, the ISM Code requires the party with operational control of a vessel to develop an extensive safety management system that includes, among other things, the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for operating its vessels safely and describing procedures for responding to emergencies.
The IMO has also adopted and revised MARPOL, including Annex VI to MARPOL, which limits the main air pollutants contained in exhaust gas from ships, including sulfur oxides (“SOx”) and nitrous oxides (“NOx”), prohibits deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances, regulates shipboard incineration and the emissions of volatile organic
compounds from tankers, sets a progressive reduction globally in emissions of SOx, NOx and particulate matter, introduces emission control areas to reduce emissions of those air pollutants further in designated sea areas, and effective from January 1, 2020, reduces the global sulfur limit in fuel oil from the current 3.50% to 0.50% m/m (mass by mass) sulfur content. Prior to January 1, 2020, our rigs were operating and continue to operate with low sulfur fuel oil at or below the global limits of 0.50%. The IMO has also targeted greenhouse gas emissions in recent amendments to Annex VI. For example, as of January 1, 2023, Annex VI requires all ships to calculate an Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index and establish an annual operational carbon intensity indicator (“CII”) and CII rating. Ships with low ratings over certain timeframes will be required to submit corrective action plans and improve their performance. The IMO is expected to continue implementing initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which could add to our costs or have an adverse impact on our operations.
The IMO has also negotiated international conventions that impose liability for oil pollution in international waters and the territorial waters of the signatory to such conventions such as the Ballast Water Management Convention, (the “BWM Convention”) and the International Convention for Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage of 2001 (the “Bunker Convention”). The BWM Convention's implementing regulations call for a phased introduction of mandatory ballast of water exchange requirements, to be replaced in time with a requirement for mandatory ballast water treatment. The Bunker Convention provides a liability, compensation and compulsory insurance system for the victims of oil pollution damage caused by spills of bunker oil. We believe that all of our drilling rigs are currently compliant in all material respects with these regulations. However, the IMO continues to review and introduce new regulations. It is impossible to predict what additional regulations, if any, may be passed by the IMO and what effect, if any, such regulation may have on our operations.
Insurance and Indemnification Matters
Our operations are subject to many hazards inherent in the drilling business, including blowouts, fires, collisions, groundings, punch-throughs, and damage or loss from adverse weather and sea conditions. These hazards could cause personal injury or loss of life, loss of revenues, pollution and other environmental damage, damage to or destruction of property and equipment and oil and natural gas producing formations, and could result in claims by employees, customers or third parties and fines and penalties.
Our drilling contracts provide for varying levels of indemnification from our customers and in most cases also require us to indemnify our customers for certain losses. Under our drilling contracts, liability with respect to personnel and property is typically assigned on a “knock-for-knock” basis, which means that we and our customers assume liability for our respective personnel and property, generally irrespective of the fault or negligence of the party indemnified. In addition, our customers may indemnify us in certain instances for damage to our down-hole equipment and, in some cases, our subsea equipment. Also, we generally obtain a mutual waiver of consequential losses in our drilling contracts.
Our customers typically assume responsibility for and indemnify us from loss or liability resulting from pollution or contamination, including third-party damages and clean-up and removal, arising from operations under the contract and originating below the surface of the water. We are generally responsible for pollution originating above the surface of the water and emanating from our drilling units. Additionally, our customers typically indemnify us for liabilities incurred as a result of a blow-out or cratering of the well and underground reservoir loss or damage. In the current market, we are under increasing pressure to accept exceptions to the above-described allocations of risk and, as a result, take on more risk. In such cases where we agree, we generally limit the exposure with a monetary cap and other restrictions.
In addition to the contractual indemnities described above, we also carry Protection and Indemnity (“P&I”) and liability insurance, which comprises a comprehensive general liability insurance program covering liability resulting from offshore operations. Our liability insurance includes coverage for liability resulting from personal injury or death of third parties and our offshore employees, third-party property damage, pollution, spill clean-up and containment and removal of wrecks or debris. We also carry hull and machinery insurance that protects us against physical loss or damage to our drilling rigs.
As of the closing of the Business Combination between Noble and Maersk Drilling on October 3, 2022, each company retained, except for certain corporate insurance policies, their respective legacy insurance programs with legacy Noble insurance covering legacy Noble assets and liabilities and legacy Maersk Drilling insurance covering legacy Maersk Drilling assets and liabilities. Noble is in the process of combining the two legacy programs into a single comprehensive, company wide insurance program.
The Noble legacy liability and hull and machinery insurance programs are renewed in April of each year, with the P&I program currently carrying a limit of $50.0 million per occurrence of which Noble retains the first $5.0 million per occurrence, plus excess liability coverage of $700.0 million in the aggregate. Our hull and machinery insurance is subject to
a deductible that is currently $5.0 million, except with respect to loss or damage from named windstorms in the Gulf of Mexico, in which event the current deductible is $10.0 million.
The legacy Maersk Drilling P&I and hull and machinery program is renewed in April and June respectively. The P&I program currently carries a limit of $200 million per occurrence ($500 million in the US Gulf of Mexico) of which the legacy Maersk Drilling group retains de minimis levels per occurrence outside the US Gulf of Mexico and a $0.5 million retention inside the US Gulf of Mexico. This program also includes excess liability coverage, which provides a total of $900 million in the aggregate. The legacy Maersk Drilling hull and machinery insurance is subject to a deductible of $7.5 million.
Our insurance policies and contractual rights to indemnity may not adequately cover our losses and liabilities in all cases. For additional information, please read Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Operations—We may have difficulty obtaining or maintaining insurance in the future and our insurance coverage and contractual indemnity rights may not protect us against all the risks and hazards we face.”
The above description of our insurance program and the indemnification provisions of our drilling contracts is only a summary as of the time of preparation of this report and is general in nature. Our insurance program and the terms of our drilling contracts may change in the future. In addition, the indemnification provisions of our drilling contracts may be subject to differing interpretations, and enforcement of those provisions may be limited by public policy and other considerations.
Available Information
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge at our website. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
Our website address is https://www.noblecorp.com. Investors should also note that we announce material financial information in SEC filings, press releases and public conference calls. Based on guidance from the SEC, we may use the investor relations section of our website to communicate with our investors. It is possible that the financial and other information posted there could be deemed to be material information. Except to the extent explicitly stated herein, documents and information contained on or linked to or from our website are not part of, and are not incorporated by reference into, this report.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
You should carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Each of these risk factors could affect our business, operating results and financial condition, as well as affect an investment in our shares.
Risks Related to Our Business and Operations
Our business depends on the level of activity in the oil and gas industry. Adverse developments affecting the industry, including a decline in the price of oil or gas, reduced demand for oil and gas products and increased regulation of drilling and production, have in the past had and may in the future have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Demand for drilling services depends on a variety of economic and political factors and the level of activity in offshore oil and gas exploration and development and production markets worldwide. The price of oil and gas, and market expectations of potential changes in the price, significantly affect this level of activity, as well as dayrates that we can charge customers for our services. Crude oil prices started to steeply decline in late 2014 and dropped to as low as approximately $19.33 per barrel of Brent Crude in April 2020. Recently, oil prices have partially recovered but have been volatile.
However, higher prices do not necessarily translate into increased drilling activity because our clients take into account a number of considerations when they decide to invest in offshore oil and gas resources, including expectations regarding future commodity prices and demand for hydrocarbons. The price of oil and gas and the level of activity in offshore oil and gas exploration and development are extremely volatile and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including:
•worldwide production, current demand, and our customer’s views of future demand for oil and gas, which are impacted by changes in the rate of economic growth in the global economy;
•the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and delivering oil and gas;
•the ability of OPEC and OPEC+ to set and maintain production levels and pricing;
•expectations regarding future energy prices;
•increased supply of oil and gas resulting from onshore hydraulic fracturing activity and shale development;
•the relative cost of offshore oil and gas exploration versus onshore oil and gas production;
•potential acceleration in the development, and the price and availability, of alternative fuels or energy sources;
•allocation of capital to E&P operations within customers’ broader portfolios;
•the level of production in non-OPEC+ countries;
•inventory levels, and the cost and availability of storage and transportation of oil, gas and their related products;
•worldwide financial instability or recessions;
•regulatory restrictions or any moratorium on offshore drilling;
•the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves either onshore or offshore;
•the rate of decline of existing and new oil and gas reserves;
•available pipeline and other oil and gas transportation capacity;
•oil refining capacity;
•the ability of oil and gas companies to raise capital;
•limitations on liquidity and available credit;
•advances in exploration, development and production technology either onshore or offshore;
•technical advances affecting energy consumption, including the displacement of hydrocarbons through increasing transportation fuel efficiencies;
•merger, acquisition and divestiture activity among oil and gas producers;
•the availability of, and access to, suitable locations from which our customers can produce hydrocarbons;
•adverse weather conditions, including hurricanes, typhoons, cyclones, winter storms and rough seas;
•the occurrence or threat of epidemic or pandemic diseases, such as COVID-19, or any governmental response to such occurrence or threat;
•tax laws, regulations and policies;
•laws, regulations and other initiatives related to environmental matters, including those involving alternative energy sources, the phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles, and the risks of global climate change;
•the political environment of oil-producing regions, including uncertainty or instability resulting from civil disorder, an outbreak or escalation of armed hostilities or acts of war or terrorism, such as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine; and
•the laws, regulations and policies of governments regarding exploration and development of their oil and gas reserves or speculation regarding future laws or regulations.
Adverse developments affecting the industry as a result of one or more of these factors, including a decline in the price of oil and gas from their current levels or the failure of the price of oil and gas to remain consistently at a level that encourages our clients to expand their capital spending, the inability of our customers to access capital on economically advantageous terms, including as a result of the increasing focus on climate change by investors, a global recession, reduced demand for oil and gas products, or a perception that the demand for hydrocarbons will significantly decrease, increased supply due to the development of new onshore drilling and production technologies, and increased regulation of drilling and production, particularly if several developments were to occur in a short period of time, would have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations. However, increases in near-term commodity prices do not necessarily translate into increased offshore drilling activity because customers’ expectations of longer-term future commodity prices and expectations regarding future demand for hydrocarbons typically have a greater impact on demand for our rigs. The level of oil and gas prices has had, and may in the future have, a material adverse effect on demand for our services, and we expect that future declines in prices would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The offshore contract drilling industry is a highly competitive and cyclical business with intense price competition. If we are unable to compete successfully, our profitability may be materially reduced.
The offshore contract drilling industry is a highly competitive and cyclical business characterized by high capital and operating costs and evolving capability of newer rigs. Drilling contracts are traditionally awarded on a competitive bid basis. Price competition, rig availability, location, suitability and technical specifications are the primary factors in determining which rig is qualified for a job, and additional factors are considered when determining which contractor is awarded a job. Such additional factors include experience of the workforce, operating efficiency, safety performance record, condition of equipment, operating integrity, reputation, industry standing and client relations. Our future success and profitability will partly depend upon our ability to keep pace with our customers’ demands with respect to these factors. In the past several years, the pace of consolidation in our industry has increased, and may continue to increase, leading to the creation of a number of larger and financially stronger competitors. If we are unable, or our customers believe that we are unable, to compete with the scale and financial strength of certain of our competitors, it could harm our ability to maintain existing drilling contracts and secure new ones. Moreover, certain of our competitors have engaged, or may in the future engage, in bankruptcy proceedings, debt refinancing transactions, management changes or other strategic initiatives in an attempt to reduce operating costs to maintain their competitive position in the market, which could result in stronger or healthier balance sheets and, in turn, an improved ability to compete with us. Further, if current competitors or new market entrants implement new or differentiated technical capabilities, services or standards, which may be more attractive to our customers or price their product offerings more competitively, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our industry is also cyclical. The offshore contract drilling industry has recently been, and currently is, in a period characterized by excess rig supply. Periods of low demand or excess rig supply intensify the competition in the industry and have resulted in, and may continue to result in, many of our rigs earning substantially lower dayrates or being idle for long periods of time. Although the industry is experiencing a rationalization and correction of the global offshore rig supply, we cannot provide you with any assurances as to when such period of excess rig supply will end, and when there will be higher demand for contract drilling services or a more meaningful reduction in the number of drilling rigs.
In addition, our customers continue to seek more favorable terms with respect to allocation of risk under offshore drilling contracts even as market conditions are improving. Our drilling contracts provide for varying levels of indemnification from our customers. Our customers have historically assumed most of the responsibility for and indemnified us from loss, damage or other liability resulting from pollution or contamination, including clean-up and removal and third-party damages arising from operations under the contract when the source of the pollution originates from the well or reservoir, including those resulting from blow-outs or cratering of the well. However, we regularly are required to assume a limited amount of liability for pollution damage caused by our negligence, which liability generally has caps for ordinary negligence, with much higher caps or unlimited liability where the damage is caused by our gross negligence or willful misconduct. We still face resistance with some clients when attempting to allocate less risk to us and lower caps for damage caused by our gross negligence or willful misconduct or reduce our exposure with respect pollution or contamination. Going forward, we could decide or be required to retain more risk in the future, resulting in higher risk of losses, which could be material. Moreover, we may not be able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at rates that we consider reasonable or be able to obtain insurance against certain risks.
An over-supply of offshore rigs has depressed, and may in the future depress, dayrates and demand for our rigs, which may adversely impact our revenues and profitability.
Following the precipitous decline in oil prices that began in 2014, our industry has experienced severe periods of severe over-supply of drilling rigs. Although the industry is experiencing a rationalization and correction of the global offshore rig supply, which has resulted in an increase in dayrates, we continue to experience competition from newbuild rigs, including rigs that have been stranded in shipyards, that have either already entered the market or are available to enter the market. The entry of these rigs into the market has resulted, and may in the future result, in lower dayrates for both newbuilds and existing rigs rolling off their current contracts. Lower utilization and dayrates have adversely affected our revenues and
profitability and may continue to do so. In addition, our competitors may relocate rigs to geographic markets in which we operate, which could exacerbate any excess rig supply, or depress the current rationalization and correction of offshore rig supply, and result in lower dayrates and utilization in those regions. To the extent that the drilling rigs currently under construction or on order do not have contracts upon their completion, there may be increased price competition as such vessels become operational, which could lead to a reduction in dayrates and in utilization. Rig operators may take lower dayrates and shorter contract durations on older rigs to keep their rigs operational and avoid scrapping or retiring them. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.
We have not been, and may continue not to be, able to renew or replace certain expiring contracts, and our customers have sought, and may continue to seek, to terminate, renegotiate or repudiate our drilling contracts and have had, and may continue to have, financial difficulties that prevent them from meeting their obligations under our drilling contracts.
Our ability to renew contracts that expire or obtain new contracts and the terms of any such contracts will depend on market conditions and our customers' expectations and assumptions of future oil prices and other factors.
Depending on market conditions, we have also experienced customers seeking price reductions for our services, payment deferrals and termination of our contracts; customers seeking to not perform under our contracts pursuant to a force majeure claim; and customers that are unable or unwilling to timely pay outstanding receivables owed to us, all of which present liquidity challenges for us. Our customers may generally terminate our drilling contracts if a drilling rig is destroyed or lost or if we have to suspend drilling operations for a specified period of time as a result of a breakdown of equipment or, in some cases, due to other events beyond the control of either party. In the case of nonperformance and under certain other conditions, our drilling contracts generally allow our customers to terminate without any payment to us. The terms of some of our drilling contracts permit the customer to terminate the contract after a specified notice period by tendering contractually specified termination amounts or, in some cases, without any payment. These termination payments, if any, may not fully compensate us for the loss of a contract. The early termination of a contract may result in a rig being idle for an extended period of time and a reduction in our contract backlog and associated revenue, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, if any of our long-term contracts were to be terminated early, such termination could affect our future earnings flow and could have material adverse effect on our future financial condition and results of operations, even if we were to receive the contractually specified termination amount.
During periods of depressed market conditions, we are subject to an increased risk of our customers seeking to renegotiate or repudiate their contracts. The ability of our customers to perform their obligations under drilling contracts with us may also be adversely affected by the financial condition of the customer, restricted credit markets, economic downturns and industry downturns. We may elect to renegotiate the rates we receive under our drilling contracts downward if we determine that to be a reasonable business solution. If our customers cancel or are unable to perform their obligations under their drilling contracts, including their payment obligations, and we are unable to secure new contracts on a timely basis on substantially similar terms or if we elect to renegotiate our drilling contracts and accept terms that are less favorable to us, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Drilling contracts with national oil companies may expose us to greater risks than we normally assume in drilling contracts with non-governmental clients.
Contracts with national oil companies are often non-negotiable and may expose us to greater commercial, political and operational risks than we assume in other contracts, such as exposure to materially greater environmental liability and other claims for damages (including consequential damages) and personal injury related to our operations, or the risk that the contract may be terminated by our client without cause on short-term notice, contractually or by governmental action, under certain conditions that may not provide us an early termination payment, collection risks and political risks. In addition, our ability to resolve disputes or enforce contractual provisions may be negatively impacted with these contracts. We can provide no assurance that the increased risk exposure will not have an adverse impact on our future operations or that we will not increase the number of rigs contracted to national oil companies with commensurate additional contractual risks.
Our current backlog of contract drilling revenue may not be ultimately realized.
Generally, contract backlog only includes future revenues under signed drilling contracts; however, from time to time, we may report anticipated commitments under letters of intent or awards for which definitive agreements have not yet been, but are expected to be, signed. We may not be able to perform under these contracts as a result of operational or other breaches or due to events beyond our control, and we may not be able to ultimately execute a definitive agreement in
cases where one does not currently exist. Moreover, we can provide no assurance that our customers will be able to or willing to fulfill their contractual commitments to us or that they will not seek to renegotiate or repudiate their contracts, especially during an industry downturn. The terms of some of our drilling contracts permit the customer to terminate the contract after specified notice periods by tendering contractually specified termination amounts or, in certain cases, without any payment. In estimating backlog, we make certain assumptions about applicable dayrates for our longer-term contracts with dayrate adjustment mechanisms (like certain of our contracts with Shell and ExxonMobil). We cannot assure you that actual results will mirror these assumptions. Our inability to perform under our contractual obligations or to execute definitive agreements, our customers’ inability or unwillingness to fulfill their contractual commitments to us, including as a result of contract repudiations or our decision to accept less favorable terms on our drilling contracts, or the failure of actual results to reflect the assumptions we use to estimate backlog for certain contracts, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are substantially dependent on several of our customers, including ExxonMobil, Shell, Equinor and Aker BP, and the loss of any of these customers could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Any concentration of customers increases the risks associated with any possible termination or nonperformance of drilling contracts, failure to renew contracts or award new contracts or reduction of their drilling programs. As of December 31, 2022, ExxonMobil and Aker BP represented approximately 41.1 percent and 21.5 percent of our contract backlog, respectively. ExxonMobil and Shell accounted for approximately 32.3 percent and 12.0 percent, respectively, of our consolidated operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2022. This concentration of customers increases the risks associated with any possible termination or nonperformance of contracts, in addition to our exposure to credit risk. If any of these customers were to terminate or fail to perform their obligations under their contracts and we were not able to find other customers for the affected drilling units promptly, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Our business involves numerous operating hazards.
Our operations are subject to many hazards inherent in the drilling business, including:
•well blowouts;
•fires;
•collisions or groundings of offshore equipment and helicopter accidents;
•punch-throughs;
•mechanical or technological failures;
•failure of our employees or third-party contractors to comply with our internal environmental, health and safety guidelines;
•pipe or cement failures and casing collapses, which could release oil, gas or drilling fluids;
•adverse weather conditions, including hurricanes, typhoons, tsunamis, cyclones, winter storms and rough seas;
•loop currents or eddies;
•failure of critical equipment;
•toxic gas emanating from the well; and
•spillage handling and disposing of materials.
These hazards could cause personal injury or loss of life, suspend drilling operations, result in regulatory investigation or penalties, seriously damage or destroy property and equipment, result in claims by employees, customers or third parties, cause environmental damage and cause substantial damage to oil and gas producing formations or facilities. Operations also may be suspended because of machinery breakdowns, abnormal drilling conditions, and failure of subcontractors to perform or supply goods or services or personnel shortages. The occurrence of any of the hazards we face could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Unionization efforts, labor interruptions and labor regulations could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Certain of our employees and contractors in international markets, such as Norway and Denmark, are represented by labor unions and work under collective bargaining or similar agreements, which are subject to periodic renegotiation. Although we have not experienced any labor disruptions, strikes or other forms of labor unrest in connection with our personnel, there can be no assurance that labor disruptions by employees and contractors will not occur in the future. Further,
unionized employees of third parties on whom we rely may be involved in labor disruptions, strikes or other forms of labor unrest, causing operational disruptions. Such actions could result in the occurrence of additional costs, as well as limitations on our ability to operate or provide services to our customers, which may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition strikes may occur in connection with annual salary negotiations with respect to unionized employees or contractors. If future labor strikes force us to shut down any of our operations, such interruption in operations could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, in connection with the completion of the Business Combination with Maersk Drilling in October 2022, we reduced the size of our combined workforce. While we believe the reduction in force was compliant with applicable labor law requirements and practices in the relevant jurisdictions, there is a risk that certain redundancies may be challenged by employees or labor unions, which could lead to further negotiations or legal proceedings. Such legal proceedings could result in additional costs for legal fees and, if unfavorable decisions are made against us, fines or damages. There is also a risk that the reduction in force could give rise to labor actions. While no such claims or actions have been brought to date, if any future challenges are brought and are successful, negative outcomes could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Public health issues, including epidemics or pandemics such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have resulted in, and may in the future cause, significant adverse consequences for our business, financial position and results of operations.
Public health issues, such as the COVID-19 (including new variants thereof) pandemic, worldwide mitigation efforts necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic, our own mitigation efforts, and the effect from the actual and potential disruption of operations of our business partners, suppliers and customers, have had, and may in the future have, a material negative impact on our business, financial position and results of operations. In response to COVID-19, governmental authorities around the world took various actions to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, such as imposing varying degrees of restrictions on business and social activities, including business shutdowns and closures, travel restrictions and quarantines. While many of the restrictions and measures initially implemented during 2020 have since been softened or lifted in varying degrees in different locations around the world, and the manufacture and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines during 2021 helped to initiate a recovery from the pandemic, increases in COVID-19 cases, the uncertainty regarding new variants of COVID-19 and the success of any vaccines in respect thereof may in the future cause a reduction in global economic activity or prompt the re-imposition of certain restrictions and measures, which could result in a reduction in the demand for oil and a decline in oil prices as occurred during 2020.
Due to travel restrictions and mandatory quarantine measures designed to prevent or reduce the spread of COVID-19, we have experienced, and may continue in the future to experience, increased difficulties, delays and expenses in moving our personnel to and from our operating locations. We may be unable to pass these increased expenses to our customers. Further, we have previously, and may in the future have to, temporarily shut down operations of one or more of our rigs if there is an outbreak of COVID-19 or vacancies of essential positions due to COVID-19 infections, which could have a material negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, disruptions to the ability of our suppliers, manufacturers and service providers to supply labor, parts, equipment or services in the jurisdictions in which we operate, whether as a result of government actions, labor shortages, travel restrictions, the inability to source labor, parts or equipment from affected locations or other effects related to the COVID-19 pandemic, have increased our operating costs and the risk of rig downtime and negatively impacted our ability to meet commitments to customers and may continue to do so in the future.
The factors described above, including the impact on customers, suppliers, manufacturers and service providers, and the impact on our operations and the demand for our services, have had, and may continue to have, a material negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. To the extent that the COVID-19 pandemic adversely impacts our business, results of operations and financial condition, it may also have the effect of increasing many of the other risks described in the “Risk Factors” section. There is no guarantee that a future outbreak of this or any other widespread epidemics or pandemics will occur.
We face risks associated with our participation in certain joint ventures as well as investments in associates.
We have made investments in certain joint ventures and as well as investments in associates. Such investments are often entered into to satisfy local requirements, including local content requirements, in certain jurisdictions and the terms of the investment agreements vary depending on the counterparty and jurisdiction involved. For example, we currently have joint ventures with local owners or partners that were entered into in the ordinary course of business to satisfy local content requirements in certain African countries, Mexico and other applicable jurisdictions in which we operate.
Investments in joint ventures or associates over which we have partial or joint control are subject to the risk that the other owners or partners in such joint venture or associate, who may have different business or investment strategies compared to ours or with whom we may have a disagreement or dispute, may have the ability to block business, financial, or management decisions (such as the decision to distribute dividends or appoint members of management) which may be crucial to the success of our investment in the joint venture or associate, or could otherwise implement initiatives which may be contrary to our interests. In addition, such joint venture owners or partners may be unable, or unwilling, to fulfil their obligations under the relevant agreements (for example by not contributing working capital or other resources), or may experience financial, operational, or other difficulties that may adversely impact our investment in a particular joint venture or associate. In addition, such joint venture owners or associates may lack sufficient controls and procedures which could expose us to risk. If any of the foregoing were to occur, such occurrence could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We are exposed to risks relating to operations in international locations, including the mobilization and de-mobilization of our rigs to and from such locations.
We operate in various regions throughout the world that may expose us to political and other uncertainties, including risks of:
•seizure, nationalization or expropriation of property or equipment;
•monetary policies, government credit rating downgrades and potential defaults, and foreign currency fluctuations and devaluations;
•limitations on the ability to repatriate income or capital;
•complications associated with repairing and replacing equipment in remote locations;
•repudiation, nullification, modification or renegotiation of contracts;
•limitations on insurance coverage, such as war risk coverage, in certain areas;
•import-export quotas, wage and price controls and imposition of trade barriers;
•delays in implementing private commercial arrangements as a result of government oversight;
•compliance with and changes in taxation rules or policies;
•compliance with and changes in various jurisdictional regulatory or financial requirements, including rig flagging and local ownership requirements;
•other forms of government regulation and economic conditions that are beyond our control and that create operational uncertainty;
•governmental corruption;
•piracy; and
•terrorist acts, war, revolution and civil disturbances, such as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
Further, we operate or have operated in certain less-developed countries with legal systems that are not as mature or predictable as those in more developed countries, which can lead to greater uncertainty in legal matters and proceedings. Examples of challenges of operating in these countries include:
•procedural requirements for temporary import permits, which may be difficult to obtain; and
•the effect of certain temporary import permit regimes, where the duration of the permit does not coincide with the general term of the drilling contract.
Our ability to do business in a number of jurisdictions is subject to maintaining required licenses and permits and complying with applicable laws and regulations. For example, all of our drilling units are subject to regulatory requirements of the flag state where the drilling unit is registered. The flag state requirements are international maritime requirements and, in some cases, further interpolated by the flag state itself. In addition, each of our drilling units must be “classed” by a classification society, signifying that such drilling rig has been built and maintained in accordance with the rules of the classification society and complies with applicable rules and regulations of the flag state. If any drilling unit loses its flag,
does not maintain its class or fails any periodical survey or special survey, the drilling unit will be unable to carry on operations and will be unable to operate and uninsurable.
Jurisdictions where we operate may attempt to impose requirements that our drilling units operating in such a jurisdiction have to satisfy certain local ownership or content requirements or be registered under the flag of that jurisdiction, or both. If our debt agreements do not permit us to change and register the flag of a rig to a different jurisdiction and comply with any applicable local ownership requirements, and if we are otherwise unable to successfully object to registration in a specific jurisdiction, we may no longer be able to operate in that country. Any such inability to carry on operations in jurisdictions where we operate or desire to operate, or our failure to comply with any other laws and regulations of the countries where we operate, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
In addition, OPEC and OPEC+ initiatives, as well as other governmental actions, have caused and may continue to cause oil price volatility. In some areas of the world, this governmental activity has adversely affected the amount of exploration and development work done by major oil companies, which may continue. In addition, some governments favor or effectively require the awarding of drilling contracts to local contractors, require use of a local agent, require partial local ownership or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. These practices may adversely affect our ability to compete and our results of operations.
The UK exited the EU on January 31, 2020, consistent with the terms of the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement, with a transition period that ended on December 31, 2020. On January 1, 2021, the UK left the EU Single Market and Customs Union as well as all EU policies and international agreements. As a result, the free movement of persons, goods, services and capital between the UK and the EU ended, and the EU and the UK formed two separate markets and two distinct regulatory and legal spaces. A trade agreement between the UK and the EU, which formally entered into force on May 1, 2021, offers UK and EU companies preferential access to each other’s markets, ensuring imported goods will be free of tariffs and quotas (subject to rules of origin requirements). Uncertainty exists regarding the ultimate impact of this trade agreement, as well as the extent of possible financial, trade, regulatory and legal implications of Brexit, also in light of the UK’s Retained EU Law Bill, which proposes to repeal or replace all EU-derived legislation by December 31, 2023. Brexit also contributes to global political and economic uncertainty, which may cause, among other consequences, volatility in exchange rates and interest rates, and changes in regulations. The Company provides contract drilling services to the international oil and gas industry and our fleet operates globally across multiple locations. Based on our global operating model and the versatility and marketability of our fleet, to date we have not seen the impact of Brexit to be significant to the Company.
In addition, the offshore drilling industry is a global market requiring flexibility for rigs, depending on their technical capability, to relocate and operate in various environments, moving from one area to another. The mobilization of rigs is expensive and time-consuming and can be impacted by several factors including, but not limited to, governmental regulation and customs practices, availability of tugs and tow vessels, weather, currents, political instability, civil unrest, and military actions, such as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and rigs may as a result become stranded. Some jurisdictions enforce strict technical requirements on the rigs requiring substantial physical modification to the rigs before they can be utilized. Such modifications may require significant capital expenditures, and as a result, may limit the use of the rigs in those jurisdictions in the future. In addition, mobilization carries the risk of damage to the rig. Failure to mobilize a rig in accordance with the deadlines set by a specific customer contract could result in a loss of compensation, liquidated damages or the cancellation or termination of the contract. In some cases, we may not be paid for the time that a rig is out of service during mobilization. In addition, in the hope of securing future contracts, we may choose to mobilize a rig to another geographic market without a customer contract in place. If no customer contracts are obtained, we would be required to absorb these costs. Mobilization and relocating activities could therefore potentially materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Operating and maintenance costs of our rigs may be significant and may not correspond to revenue earned.
Our operating expenses and maintenance costs depend on a variety of factors including: crew costs, costs of provisions, equipment, insurance, maintenance and repairs, shipyard costs, supply chain disruptions and inflation, many of which are beyond our control. Our total operating costs are generally related to the number of drilling rigs in operation and the cost level in each country or region where such drilling rigs are located. Equipment maintenance costs fluctuate depending upon the type of activity that the drilling rig is performing and the age and condition of the equipment. Operating and maintenance costs will not necessarily fluctuate in proportion to changes in operating revenues. While operating revenues may fluctuate as a function of changes in dayrate, costs for operating a rig may not be proportional to the dayrate received and may vary based on a variety of factors, including the scope and length of required rig preparations and the duration of the contractual period over which such expenditures are amortized. Any investments in our rigs may not result in an
increased dayrate for or income from such rigs. A disproportionate change in the amount of operating and maintenance costs in comparison to dayrates could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Operational interruptions or maintenance or repair work may cause our customers to suspend or reduce payment of dayrates until operation of the respective drilling rig is resumed, which may lead to loss of revenue or termination or renegotiation of the drilling contract.
If our drilling rigs are idle for reasons that are not related to the ability of the rig to operate, our customers are entitled to pay a waiting, or standby, rate that is lower than the full operational rate. In addition, if our drilling rigs are taken out of service for maintenance and repair for a period of time that exceeds the scheduled maintenance periods set forth in our drilling contracts, we will not be entitled to payment of dayrates until the rig is able to work. Several factors could cause operational interruptions, including:
•breakdowns of equipment and other unforeseen engineering problems;
•work stoppages, including labor strikes;
•shortages of material and skilled labor;
•delays in repairs by suppliers;
•surveys by government and maritime authorities;
•periodic classification surveys;
•inability to obtain permits;
•severe weather, strong ocean currents or harsh operating conditions;
•force majeure events; and
•the occurrence or threat of epidemic or pandemic diseases, such as COVID-19, or any government response to such occurrence or threat.
Several of these factors have been exacerbated by current global supply chain disruptions, including disruptions due to COVID-19. If the interruption of operations exceeds a determined period due to an event of force majeure, our customers have the right to pay a rate that is significantly lower than the waiting rate for a period of time and, thereafter, may terminate the drilling contracts related to the subject rig. Suspension of drilling contract payments, prolonged payment of reduced rates or termination of any drilling contract as a result of an interruption of operations as described herein could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may have difficulty obtaining or maintaining insurance in the future and our insurance coverage and contractual indemnity rights may not protect us against all the risks and hazards we face.
We do not procure insurance coverage for all of the potential risks and hazards we may face. Furthermore, no assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain insurance against all of the risks and hazards we face or that we will be able to obtain or maintain adequate insurance at rates and with deductibles or retention amounts that we consider commercially reasonable. Some insurance carriers may decide not to offer insurance to companies operating in the Oil & Gas industry, potentially resulting in less available insurance capacity and/or higher rates. In addition, our insurance carriers may interpret our insurance policies such that they do not cover losses for which we make claims.
Although we maintain insurance in the geographic areas in which we operate, pollution, reservoir damage and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. Our insurance policies may not adequately cover our losses or may have exclusions of coverage for some losses. We do not have insurance coverage for all risk exposures e.g. we only have loss of hire insurance on some of the rigs in our fleet. Uninsured exposures may include expatriate activities prohibited by US laws and regulations, radiation hazards, cyber risks, certain loss or damage to property onboard our rigs and losses relating to shore-based terrorist acts or strikes. In addition, our insurance may not cover losses associated with pandemics such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the damage sustained to offshore oil and gas assets in the United States as a result of hurricanes has negatively impacted certain aspects of the energy insurance market, resulting in more restrictive and expensive coverage for US named windstorm perils due to the price or lack of availability of coverage. Accordingly, we have in the past self-insured the rigs in the US Gulf of Mexico for named windstorm perils. We currently have US windstorm coverage for most of our US fleet subject to certain limits but will continue to monitor the insurance market conditions in
the future and may decide not to, or be unable to, purchase named windstorm coverage for some or all of the rigs operating in the US Gulf of Mexico.
Under our drilling contracts, liability with respect to personnel and property is customarily assigned on a “knock-for-knock” basis, which means that we and our customers assume liability for our respective personnel and property, irrespective of the fault or negligence of the party indemnified. Although our drilling contracts generally provide for indemnification from our customers for certain liabilities, including liabilities resulting from pollution or contamination originating below the surface of the water, enforcement of these contractual rights to indemnity may be limited by public policy and other considerations and, in any event, may not adequately cover our losses from such incidents. There can also be no assurance that those parties with contractual obligations to indemnify us will necessarily be in a financial position to do so. During depressed market periods, such as the one in which we recently operated, the contractual indemnity provisions we are able to negotiate in our drilling contracts may require us to assume more risk than we would during normal market periods.
If a significant accident or other event occurs and is not fully covered by insurance or contractual indemnity, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our failure to adequately protect our sensitive information and operational technology systems and critical data and our service providers’ failure to protect their systems and data could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our day-to-day operations increasingly depend on information and operational technology systems that we manage, and other systems that our third parties, such as our service providers, vendors, and equipment providers, manage, including critical systems on our drilling units. These systems are subject to risks associated with growing and evolving cyber incidents or attacks. These risks include, but may not be limited to, human error, power outages, computer and telecommunication failures, natural disasters, fraud or malice, social engineering or phishing attacks, viruses or malware, and other cyberattacks, such as denial-of-service or ransomware attacks. Reports indicate that entities or groups, including cybercriminals, competitors, and nation state actors, have mounted cyber-attacks on businesses and other organizations solely to disable or disrupt computer systems, disrupt operations and, in some cases, steal data. In addition, the US government has issued public warnings that indicate energy assets and companies engaging in significant transactions, such as acquisitions, might be specific targets of cybersecurity threats.
Also, many of our non-operational employees work remotely a significant amount of their time, which has created certain operational risks, such as an increased risk of security breaches or other cyber incidents or attacks, loss of data, fraud and other disruptions as more fully outlined, above. Working remotely has significantly increased the use of technological and online telecommunication services and remote networking, which enable employees to work outside of our corporate infrastructure and, in some cases, use their own personal devices. This remote work model has resulted in an increased demand for technological resources and may expose us to additional risks of cyber-incidents or attacks, security breaches, loss of data, fraud and other disruptions as a consequence of more employees accessing sensitive and critical information remotely. Due to the nature of cyber-attacks, breaches to our systems or our service or equipment providers’ systems could go undetected for a prolonged period of time. A breach could also compromise or originate from our customers’, vendors’, or other third-party systems or networks outside of our control. A security breach may result in legal claims or proceedings against us by our shareholders, employees, customers, vendors and governmental authorities, both in the US and internationally.
While the Company maintains a cybersecurity program, which includes administrative, technical, and organizational safeguards, a significant cyberattack or incident—either with our systems or a critical third-party systems—could disrupt our operations and result in downtime, loss of revenue, harm to the Company's reputation, or the loss, theft, corruption or unauthorized release of our critical data or those with whom we do business, as well as result in higher costs to correct and remedy the effects of such incidents, including potential extortion, unforeseen payments associated with ransomware or ransom demands. If our, or our service or equipment providers’, safeguards maintained for protecting against cyber incidents or attacks prove to be insufficient, and an incident were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, reputation, and results of operations. Even though we carry cyber insurance that may provide insurance coverage under certain circumstances, we might suffer losses as a result of a security breach or cyber incident that exceeds the coverage available under our policy or for which we do not have coverage.
In addition, laws and regulations governing, or proposed to govern, cybersecurity, data privacy and protection, and the unauthorized disclosure of confidential or protected information, including the U.K. Data Protection Act, the EU General Data Protection Regulation, the Data Protection Law, as revised, of the Cayman Islands, the California Consumer Privacy Act, the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act, and other similar legislation in domestic and international
jurisdictions pose increasingly complex compliance challenges and potentially elevate costs, and any failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in significant penalties and legal liability.
Upgrades, refurbishment and repair of rigs are subject to risks, including delays and cost overruns, that could have an adverse impact on our available cash resources and results of operations.
We will continue to make upgrades, refurbishment and repair expenditures to our fleet from time to time, some of which may be unplanned. In addition, we may reactivate rigs that have been cold or warm stacked and make selective acquisitions of rigs. Our customers may also require certain shipyard reliability upgrade projects for our rigs. These projects and other efforts of this type are subject to risks of cost overruns or delays inherent in any large construction project as a result of numerous factors, including the following:
•shortages of equipment, materials or skilled labor;
•work stoppages and labor disputes;
•unscheduled delays in the delivery of ordered materials and equipment;
•local customs strikes or related work slowdowns that could delay importation of equipment or materials;
•weather interferences;
•difficulties in obtaining necessary permits or approvals or in meeting permit or approval conditions;
•design and engineering problems;
•inadequate regulatory support infrastructure in the local jurisdiction;
•latent damages or deterioration to hull, equipment and machinery in excess of engineering estimates and assumptions;
•unforeseen increases in the cost of equipment, labor and raw materials, particularly steel due to inflation or other factors;
•unanticipated actual or purported change orders;
•client acceptance delays;
•disputes with shipyards and suppliers;
•delays in, or inability to obtain, access to funding;
•shipyard availability, failures and difficulties, including as a result of financial problems of shipyards or their subcontractors; and
•failure or delay of third-party equipment vendors or service providers.
The failure to complete a rig upgrade, refurbishment or repair on time, or at all, may result in related loss of revenues, penalties, or delay, renegotiation or cancellation of a drilling contract or the recognition of an asset impairment. Additionally, capital expenditures could materially exceed our planned capital expenditures. Moreover, when our rigs are undergoing upgrade, refurbishment and repair, they may not earn a dayrate during the period they are out of service. If we experience substantial delays and cost overruns in our shipyard projects, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We currently have no new rigs under construction.
Failure to attract and retain skilled personnel or an increase in personnel costs could adversely affect our operations.
We require skilled personnel to operate and provide technical services and support for our drilling units. In the past, during periods of high demand for drilling services and increasing worldwide industry fleet size, shortages of qualified personnel have occurred. During periods of reduced demand, there were layoffs of qualified personnel (including offshore personnel), who often find work with competitors or leave the industry. As a result, if market conditions further improve and we seek to reactivate warm or cold stacked rigs, upgrade our working rigs or purchase additional rigs, we may face shortages of qualified personnel, which would impair our ability to attract qualified personnel for our new or existing drilling units, impair the timeliness and quality of our work and create upward pressure on personnel costs, any of which could adversely affect our operations. In addition, the unexpected loss of members of management, qualified personnel or a significant number of employees due to disease, including COVID-19, disability or death, could have a material adverse effect on us.
Supplier capacity constraints or shortages in parts or equipment, supplier production disruptions, supplier quality and sourcing issues or price increases could increase our operating costs, decrease our revenues and adversely impact our operations.
Our reliance on third-party suppliers, manufacturers and service providers to secure equipment used in our drilling operations exposes us to volatility in the quality, price and availability of such items. Certain specialized parts and equipment we use in our operations may be available only from a single or small number of suppliers. During periods of reduced demand, many of these third-party suppliers reduced their inventories of parts and equipment and, in some cases, reduced their production capacity. Moreover, the global supply chain has been disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in shortages of, and increased pricing pressures on, among other things, certain raw materials and labor. If the market for our services improves and we seek to reactivate warm or cold stacked rigs, upgrade our working rigs or purchase additional rigs, these reductions and global supply chain constraints could make it more difficult for us to find equipment and parts for our rigs. A disruption or delay in the deliveries from such third-party suppliers, capacity constraints, production disruptions, price increases (including those related to inflation and supply chain disruptions), defects or quality-control issues, recalls or other decreased availability or servicing of parts and equipment could adversely affect our ability to reactivate rigs, upgrade working rigs, purchase additional rigs or meet our commitments to customers on a timely basis, adversely impact our operations and revenues by resulting in uncompensated downtime, reduced dayrates, the incurrence of liquidated damages or other penalties or the cancellation or termination of contracts, or increase our operating costs.
We may experience risks associated with future mergers, acquisitions or dispositions of businesses or assets or other strategic transactions.
As part of our business strategy, and as evidenced by the Pacific Drilling Merger (as defined herein) and the Business Combination with Maersk Drilling, we have pursued and completed, and may continue to pursue, mergers, acquisitions or dispositions of businesses or assets or other strategic transactions that we believe will enable us to strengthen or broaden our business. We may be unable to implement this element of our strategy if we cannot identify suitable companies, businesses or assets, reach agreement on potential strategic transactions on acceptable terms, manage the impacts of such transactions on our business or for other reasons. Moreover, mergers, acquisitions, dispositions and other strategic transactions involve various risks, including, among other things, (i) difficulties relating to integrating or disposing of a business and unanticipated changes in customer and other third-party relationships subsequent thereto, (ii) diversion of management’s attention from day-to-day operations, (iii) failure to realize the anticipated benefits of such transactions, such as cost savings and revenue enhancements, (iv) potentially substantial transaction costs associated with such transactions and (v) potential impairment resulting from the overpayment for an acquisition.
Future mergers or acquisitions may require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available on attractive terms. Moreover, to the extent a transaction financed by non-equity consideration results in goodwill, it will reduce our tangible net worth, which might have an adverse effect on credit availability.
Acts of terrorism, piracy and political and social unrest could affect the markets for drilling services, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Acts of terrorism and social unrest, brought about by world political events or otherwise, such as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, have caused instability in the world’s financial and insurance markets in the past and may occur in the future. Such acts could be directed against companies such as ours. In addition, acts of terrorism, piracy and social unrest could lead to increased volatility in prices for crude oil and natural gas and could affect the markets for drilling services. Insurance premiums could increase and coverage may be unavailable in the future. Government regulations may effectively preclude us from engaging in business activities in certain countries. These regulations could be amended to cover countries where we currently operate or where we may wish to operate in the future.
Our drilling contracts do not generally provide indemnification against loss of capital assets or loss of revenues resulting from acts of terrorism, piracy or political or social unrest. We have limited insurance for our assets providing coverage for physical damage losses resulting from risks, such as terrorist acts, piracy, vandalism, sabotage, civil unrest, expropriation and acts of war, and we do not carry insurance for loss of revenues resulting from such risks.
Certain shareholders own a significant portion of our outstanding equity securities, and their interests may not always coincide with the interests of other holders of the Ordinary Shares.
As noted above, a large percentage of the Ordinary Shares are held by a relatively small number of investors. As a result, these investors could have significant influence over all matters presented to our shareholders for approval, including
election and removal of our directors, change in control transactions and the outcome of all actions requiring a majority shareholder approval.
The interests of these investors may not always coincide with the interests of the other holders of the Ordinary Shares, and the concentration of control in these investors may limit other shareholders’ ability to influence corporate matters. The concentration of ownership and voting power of these investors may also delay, defer or even prevent an acquisition by a third party or other change of control of our Company and may make some transactions more difficult or impossible without their support, even if such events are in the best interests of our other shareholders. In addition, the concentration of voting power may adversely affect the trading price of the Ordinary Shares.
The potential for US Gulf of Mexico hurricane related windstorm damage, liabilities, or claims could result in uninsured losses, impacts to customer contracts and/or may cause us to alter our operating procedures during hurricane season, which could adversely affect our business.
Certain areas of the world such as the US Gulf of Mexico experience hurricanes and other extreme weather conditions on a generally cyclical basis. Some of our drilling rigs in the US Gulf of Mexico are located in areas that could cause them to be susceptible to damage and/or total loss by these storms. Damage caused by high winds, turbulent seas and other severe weather conditions could result in rig loss or damage (some of which may be uninsured), termination of drilling contracts for lost or severely damaged rigs or curtailment of operations on damaged drilling rigs with reduced or suspended dayrates for significant periods of time until the damage can be repaired, which could adversely affect our business. Moreover, our operating procedures may be altered during hurricane season in preparation for such severe weather conditions.
Failure to effectively and timely respond to the impact of energy rebalancing could adversely affect our business, results of operations and cash flows.
Our long-term success depends on our ability to effectively respond to the impact of energy rebalancing, which could require adapting our fleet and business to potentially changing government requirements, customer preferences and customer base, as well as engaging with existing and potential customers and suppliers to develop or implement solutions designed to reduce or to decarbonize oil and gas operations or to advance renewable and other alternative energy sources. If the energy rebalancing landscape changes faster than anticipated or in a manner that we do not anticipate, demand for our services could be adversely affected. Furthermore, if we fail to, or are perceived not to, effectively implement an energy rebalancing strategy, or if investors or financial institutions shift funding away from companies in fossil fuel-related industries, our access to capital or the market for our securities could be negatively impacted.
We rely on third-party suppliers and subcontractors to provide or complete parts, crew and equipment, as applicable, for our projects and our operations may be adversely affected by the sub-standard performance or non-performance of those suppliers or third-party subcontractors due to production disruptions, quality and sourcing issues, price increases or consolidation of suppliers and sub-contractors as well as equipment breakdowns.
Our reliance on third-parties such as suppliers, manufacturers, subcontractors and other service providers for equipment, services and labor used in our drilling operations exposes us to volatility in the quality, price and availability of such resources. Certain specialized parts, crew and equipment used in our operations may be available only from a single or a small number of suppliers. A disruption in the deliveries from such third-party suppliers, capacity constraints, production disruptions, price increases, defects or quality-control issues, recalls or other decrease in the availability or servicing of parts and equipment could adversely affect our ability to meet our commitments towards our customers, adversely impact operations and revenues by resulting in uncompensated downtime, reduced day rates under the relevant drilling contracts, cancellation or termination of contracts, or increased operating costs. In addition, consolidation of suppliers may limit our ability to obtain supplies and services when needed at an acceptable cost or at all.
Equipment deficiencies or breakdowns, whether due to faulty parts, quality control issues or inadequate installation, may result in increased maintenance costs and could adversely affect our operations and revenues by resulting in financial downtime. For example, we have a multi-year maintenance project to overhaul jacking gears on certain jack-up rigs involving significant costs. While we are pursuing recovery options in respect of certain of the project costs, there can be no assurance as to the extent to we will recover those costs. If mitigation measures put in place are not effective, it could lead to significant financial downtime, adversely affect our ability to meet our commitments towards our customers, potential cancellation or termination of drilling contracts, suspension or termination of operations, regulatory penalties or sanctions, property, environmental and other damage claims by customers or other third parties, which may in turn have a material adverse effect on the our business, financial condition, results of operations, and reputation.
We engage third-party subcontractors to perform some parts of our projects and in respect of new business models a majority of the services under a project may be subcontracted to third-party subcontractors. Subcontractors are used to perform certain services and to provide certain input in areas where we do not have requisite expertise. The subcontracting of work exposes us to risks associated with planning interface non-performance, delayed performance or substandard performance by our subcontractors. Any inability to hire qualified subcontractors could hinder successful completion of a project. Further, our employees may not have the requisite skills to be able to monitor or control the performance of these subcontractors. We may suffer losses on contracts if the amounts we are required to pay for subcontractor services exceed original estimates. Remedial or mitigating actions, such as requiring contractual obligations on subcontractors that are similar to those we have with our customers, and requesting parent guarantees to cover nonperformance by subcontractors, may not be available or sufficient to mitigate the risks associated with subcontractors. For example, we have experienced issues with the performance of some of our key suppliers in the past, in particular in relation to delays in the delivery and maintenance of subsea well-control equipment. Such issues could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We face risks associated with creating and executing new business models, particularly when such business models involve a risk profile, remuneration, or financial scheme that is different from a conventional drilling contract.
We are exploring, and have in the past, implemented various degrees of innovative business models with customers and partners in order to expand our share of the value chain, while simultaneously creating better outcomes for our customers and long-term resilience of our business through increased customer collaboration, differentiation and utilization. Although such business model innovation is intended to offer further earnings opportunities, there are risks associated with creating and executing new business models, particularly when such business models involve a risk profile, remuneration, or financial scheme that is different from our conventional drilling contracts.
We are currently implementing two broad categories of business models including:
| | | | | | | | |
| (i) | integrating new services into joint offerings to customers as an integrated service provider with the objective of removing waste in the well-delivery supply chain through better orchestration and alignment of incentives; and |
| (ii) | offering new financial models focused on risk and reward sharing through, among other things, deferred payments, fixed pricing or co-investments, enabling operators to develop fields that would otherwise be economically challenged. However, forecasting the success of any new business model is inherently uncertain and depends on a number of factors both within and outside our control. Our actual revenue and profit generated from such business models may be significantly greater or less than forecasts. In addition, the efficiencies anticipated from new business models may fail to be realized, the costs may be higher and the counterparty risk greater than expected. In addition, as we create and execute more new business models and expand into other parts of the value chain, our risk profile may continue to shift. Entering into new business models could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. |
Risks Related to the Business Combination with Maersk Drilling
The integration of Maersk Drilling into the combined company may not be as successful as anticipated, and may cost more than estimated, and the combined company may not achieve the intended benefits or do so within the intended timeframe.
The Business Combination involves numerous operational, strategic, financial, accounting, legal, tax and other risks, including potential liabilities associated with the acquired business and integration thereof. Difficulties in integrating the business practices and operations of Noble and Maersk Drilling may result in our performing differently than expected, in operational challenges or in the delay or failure to realize anticipated expense-related efficiencies, and could have an adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or our cash flows. Potential difficulties that may be encountered in the integration process include, among other factors:
•the inability to successfully integrate the businesses of Noble and Maersk Drilling, operationally and culturally, in a manner that permits us to achieve the full revenue and cost savings anticipated from the Business Combination;
•complexities, including increased demands of management and employees, associated with managing a larger, more complex, integrated business;
•difficulties in integrating Maersk Drilling’s and Noble’s respective enterprise resource planning software;
•risks related to the design and implementation of a combined internal control environment;
•not realizing anticipated synergies;
•attempts by third parties to terminate or alter their contracts with us, including as a result of change of control provisions;
•the inability to retain key employees and otherwise integrate personnel from the two companies;
•potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen expenses associated with the Business Combination;
•difficulty or inability to comply with the covenants of the debt of the combined company;
•difficulty or inability in refinancing existing indebtedness of Noble or Maersk Drilling as it comes due, including certain indebtedness of Maersk Drilling that became current in the fourth quarter of 2022 and is due to mature in the fourth quarter of 2023;
•integrating relationships with customers, vendors and business partners;
•performance shortfalls, including operating, safety, or environmental performance as a result of the diversion of management’s and employees’ attention caused by integrating Noble’s and Maersk Drilling’s operations; and
•the disruption of, or the loss of momentum in, our ongoing business or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies.
The success of the Business Combination will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated benefits and cost savings from the Business Combination. Although we expect to realize run-rate annual cost-synergies of $125 million within two years of the closing of the Business Combination, our ability to realize such synergies may be affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the use of more cash or other financial resources on integration and implementation activities than anticipated; unanticipated increases in expenses unrelated to the Business Combination, which may offset the expected cost savings and other synergies from the Business Combination; and our ability to eliminate duplicative back office overhead and redundant selling, general, and administrative functions. The anticipated benefits and cost savings of the Business Combination may not be realized fully or at all, may take longer to realize than expected or could have other adverse effects that we do not currently foresee. In addition, the anticipated benefits and cost savings of the Business Combination as well as the related integration costs are based on a number of estimates and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and subject to risks that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those contained in such cost estimates. Some of the assumptions that we have made, such as the achievement of certain synergies, may not be realized within the anticipated timeframe, or at all.
If we fail to realize the anticipated synergies or other benefits or recognize further synergies or benefits, or the estimated integration costs of the Business Combination are exceeded, the business rationale of the Business Combination could not be realized and the value of the shareholders’ investment into us could decrease.
If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate financial statements could be impaired, which could adversely affect our operating results, our ability to operate our business and investors’ view of us.
As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act (the “Exchange Act”), and are required to comply with the applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We must perform a quarterly evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as well as an annual evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management and our independent registered public accounting firm to report annually on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Interpretive guidance issued by SEC staff allows a company to exclude an acquired business from the assessment of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for one year following the date on which the acquisition is completed. In accordance with this guidance, we have excluded the Maersk Drilling acquired business from our assessment of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 and may exclude other acquired businesses in the future for the applicable time frames.
Although the recently-acquired Maersk Drilling is excluded from our assessment of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, subsequent to the closing date we nonetheless conducted initial assessments into certain processes and controls of Maersk Drilling. Based on our initial and limited
assessments, Maersk Drilling did not design and maintain effective controls over certain information technology (“IT”) general controls for information systems that are relevant to the preparation of Maersk Drilling’s financial statements. Specifically, legacy Maersk Drilling did not design and maintain: (i) program change management controls to ensure that program and data changes are identified, tested, authorized, and implemented appropriately and (ii) user access controls to ensure appropriate segregation of duties and to adequately restrict user and privileged access to appropriate personnel.
Based on our initial assessment, Noble’s management believes that these deficiencies constitute a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the recently-acquired Maersk Drilling business as of December 31, 2022. This material weakness did not result in any misstatements to the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2022. However, this material weakness could result in misstatements of the related account balances or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. If we are unable to effectively remediate the control deficiencies identified or any other control deficiencies that may come to our attention, or are otherwise unable to maintain adequate internal controls related to the acquired Maersk Drilling business in the future, we may not be able to prepare reliable consolidated financial statements and comply with our reporting obligations on a timely basis, which could materially adversely affect our business and subject us to legal and regulatory action.
We cannot assure you that there will not be material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting in the future. Any failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could severely inhibit our ability to accurately report our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. If we are unable to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as a result of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, the market price of our common stock could decline, and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by listing regulators, the SEC or other regulatory authorities. Failure to remedy any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, or to implement or maintain other effective control systems required of public companies, could also restrict our future access to the capital markets.
Financial and Tax Risks
We may record impairment charges on property and equipment, including rigs and related capital spares.
We evaluate the impairment of property and equipment, which include rigs and related capital spares, whenever events or changes in circumstances (including a decision to cold stack, retire or sell rigs) indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss on our property and equipment may exist when the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. Any impairment loss recognized represents the excess of the asset’s carrying value over the estimated fair value. As part of this analysis, we make assumptions and estimates regarding future market conditions. To the extent actual results do not meet our estimated assumptions, for a given rig or piece of equipment, we may take an impairment loss in the future. In addition, we may also take an impairment loss on capital spares and other capital equipment when we deem the value of those items has declined due to factors like obsolescence, deterioration or damage. Based upon our impairment analyses for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we did not record any impairment charges. There can be no assurance that we will not have to take additional impairment charges in the future if depressed market conditions return, or that we will be able to return cold stacked rigs to service in the time frame and at the reactivation costs or at the dayrates that we projected. It is reasonably possible that the estimate of undiscounted cash flows may change in the near term, resulting in the need to write down the affected assets to their corresponding estimated fair values.
We conduct substantially all of our business through Finco and its subsidiaries, and the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes contains operating and financial restrictions that may restrict Finco’s business and financing activities.
On the Emergence Effective Date, and pursuant to the terms of the Plan, Finco issued an aggregate principal amount of $216.0 million of Second Lien Notes, of which $173.7 million is outstanding as of December 31, 2022. The Second Lien Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior secured second-priority basis, by the direct and indirect subsidiaries of Finco that are Credit Parties under the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined herein). The Second Lien Notes and such guarantees are secured by senior priority liens on the assets subject to liens securing the Revolving Credit Facility, including the equity interests in Finco and each guarantor of the Second Lien Notes, all of the rigs owned by the Company as of the Emergence Effective Date or acquired thereafter, certain assets related thereto, and substantially all other assets of Finco and such guarantors, in each case, subject to certain exceptions and limitations. None of Pacific Drilling (as defined herein), Maersk Drilling or any of their respective current subsidiaries is a subsidiary guarantor of the Revolving Credit Facility or the Second Lien Notes, and none of their assets secure the Revolving Credit Facility or the
Second Lien Notes. Finco is entitled to pay interest on the Second Lien Notes in the form of PIK Notes (as defined herein) at its option in lieu of paying cash interest. As a result, we cannot assure you that Finco will make cash interest payments on the Second Lien Notes. The payment of interest through PIK Notes will increase the amount of Finco’s indebtedness and increase the risks associated with its level of indebtedness.
We conduct substantially all of our business through Finco and its subsidiaries. The primary restrictive covenants contained in the indenture under which the Second Lien Notes were issued limit Finco’s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions or repurchase or redeem its capital stock and certain indebtedness, create liens securing certain indebtedness, incur certain indebtedness, consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of its properties and assets, enter into transactions with affiliates and dispose of assets and use proceeds from the dispositions of assets.
Finco’s ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes may be affected by events beyond its control. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate, Finco’s ability to comply with these covenants and restrictions may be impaired. A failure to comply with the covenants, ratios or tests in the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on Finco’s and our business, financial condition and results of operations. Finco’s existing and future indebtedness may have cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions. Upon the triggering of any such provision, the relevant creditor may:
• not be required to lend any additional amounts to Finco;
• elect to declare all borrowings outstanding due to them, together with accrued and unpaid interest and fees, to be due and payable (and, with respect to Finco’s secured indebtedness, foreclose on the collateral securing such indebtedness);
• elect to require that all obligations accrue interest at the default rate provided therein, if such rate has not already been imposed;
• have the ability to require Finco to apply all of its available cash to repay such borrowings; and/or
• prevent Finco from making debt service payments under its other agreements, any of which could result in an event of default under the Second Lien Notes.
If any of Finco’s existing indebtedness were to be accelerated, there can be no assurance that it would have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to repay such indebtedness in full. Even if new financing were available, it may be on terms that are less attractive to Finco than the Revolving Credit Facility or the Second Lien Notes or it may not be on terms that are acceptable to Finco.
The Revolving Credit Agreement contains various restrictive covenants limiting the discretion of our management in operating our business.
The Revolving Credit Agreement contains various restrictive covenants that may limit our management’s discretion in certain respects. In particular, the Revolving Credit Agreement limits Finco’s ability and the ability of its restricted subsidiaries to, among other things and subject to certain limitations and exceptions, (i) incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness; (ii) pay dividends or distributions on capital stock or redeem or repurchase capital stock; (iii) make investments; (iv) repay, redeem or amend certain indebtedness; (v) sell stock of its subsidiaries; (vi) transfer or sell assets; (vii) create, incur or assume liens; (viii) enter into transactions with certain affiliates; (ix) merge or consolidate with or into any other person or undergo certain other fundamental changes; and (x) enter into certain burdensome agreements. In addition, the Revolving Credit Agreement obligates Finco and its restricted subsidiaries to comply with certain financial maintenance covenants and, under certain conditions, to make mandatory prepayments and reduce the amount of credit available under the Revolving Credit Facility, all as described in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations— Liquidity and Capital Resources— Post-emergence Debt—Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility.” Such mandatory prepayments and commitment reductions may affect cash available for use in the Company’s business. Our failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in all obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility to be declared due and payable immediately and all commitments thereunder to be terminated. None of Pacific Drilling, Maersk Drilling or their respective current subsidiaries are “restricted subsidiaries” for purposes of the Revolving Credit Facility.
The New DNB Credit Facility contains, and future facilities may contain, various restrictive covenants limiting the discretion of our management in operating our business.
The New DNB Credit Facility contains, and future facilities may contain, various restrictive covenants that may limit our management’s discretion in certain respects. In particular, this loan has covenants that generally apply to legacy Maersk Drilling entities and Noble as Guarantor, and which limit the ability of the legacy Maersk Drilling entities to, among other things and subject to certain limitations and exceptions, (i) pay dividends or distributions on capital stock or redeem or repurchase capital stock; (ii) enter into transactions with certain affiliates; and (iii) merge or consolidate with or into any other person or undergo certain other fundamental changes. In addition, the New DNB Credit Facility obligates the legacy Maersk Drilling entities and Noble to comply with certain financial maintenance covenants. Under certain conditions, the legacy Maersk Drilling entities must make mandatory prepayments on the Legacy Maersk Drilling Loans. Such mandatory prepayments may affect cash available for use in the Company’s business. Our failure to comply with these covenants, or similar covenants in the future, could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in all obligations under the Legacy Maersk Drilling Loans or other then existing loans to be declared due and payable immediately and all commitments thereunder to be terminated.
The phase-out and replacement of LIBOR with an alternative reference rate may adversely affect financial markets and the interest rate we pay on our floating rate debt.
The loans outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility, or under future facilities may, bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the applicable margin plus, at Finco’s option, either: (i) the reserve-adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or (ii) a base rate. On March 5, 2021, the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK issued an announcement on the future cessation or loss of representativeness for LIBOR benchmark settings currently published by ICE Benchmark Administration. The announcement confirmed that LIBOR will either cease to be provided by any administrator or will no longer be representative after December 31, 2021 for all non-USD LIBOR reference rates, and for certain short-term USD LIBOR reference rates, and after June 30, 2023 for other reference rates. While the Revolving Credit Facility contains hardwired “fallback” provisions providing for an alternative reference rate upon the occurrence of certain events related to the phase-out of LIBOR, the alternative reference rate plus any associated spread adjustment may result in interest rates higher than LIBOR. As a result, our interest expense could increase on loans outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. In addition, the overall financial markets may be disrupted as a result of the phase-out or replacement of LIBOR. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential phase-out and alternative reference rates or disruption in the financial market could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
A loss of a major tax dispute or a successful tax challenge to our operating structure, intercompany pricing policies or the taxable presence of our subsidiaries in certain countries could result in a higher tax rate on our worldwide earnings, which could result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Income tax returns that we file will be subject to review and examination. We recognize the benefit of income tax positions we believe are more likely than not to be sustained upon challenge by a tax authority. If any tax authority successfully challenges our operational structure, intercompany pricing policies, the taxable presence of our subsidiaries in certain countries or other material tax positions, if the terms of certain income tax treaties are interpreted in a manner that is adverse to our structure, or if we lose a material tax dispute in any country, our effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings and our cash tax expense could increase substantially and result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Our consolidated effective income tax rate may vary substantially from one reporting period to another.
We cannot provide any assurances as to what our consolidated effective income tax rate will be because of, among other matters, uncertainty regarding the nature and extent of our business activities in any particular jurisdiction in the future and the tax laws of such jurisdictions, as well as potential changes in the UK, US, Guyana, Luxembourg, Norway, Singapore, Denmark and other tax laws, regulations or treaties or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, changes in the administrative practices and precedents of tax authorities or any reclassification or other matter (such as changes in applicable accounting rules) that increases the amounts we have provided for income taxes or deferred tax assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. For example, certain countries within which we operate or own substantial assets have enacted changes to their tax laws in response to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s ongoing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting initiatives and these and other countries may enact changes to their tax laws or practices in the future (prospectively or retroactively), which may have a material adverse effect on our financial position, operating results and/or cash flows.
The United States enacted the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “Inflation Reduction Act”) on August 16, 2022. This law imposes, among other things, a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax on adjusted financial statement income, and a 1% excise tax on certain corporate stock repurchases occurring after December 31, 2022. While we believe these tax law changes have no immediate effect on us and are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations going forward, it is unclear how they will be implemented by the US Department of Treasury and what, if any, impact they will have on our tax rate. We will continue to evaluate the impact of the Inflation Reduction Act as further information becomes available.
In addition, as a result of frequent changes in the taxing jurisdictions in which our drilling rigs are operated and/or owned, changes in the overall level of our income and changes in tax laws, our consolidated effective income tax rate may vary substantially from one reporting period to another. Income tax rates imposed in the tax jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries conduct operations vary, as does the tax base to which the rates are applied. In some cases, tax rates may be applicable to gross revenues, statutory or negotiated deemed profits or other bases utilized under local tax laws, rather than to net income. Our drilling rigs frequently move from one taxing jurisdiction to another to perform contract drilling services. In some instances, the movement of drilling rigs among taxing jurisdictions will involve the transfer of ownership of the drilling rigs among our subsidiaries. If we are unable to mitigate the negative consequences of any change in law, audit, business activity or other matter, this could cause our consolidated effective income tax rate to increase and cause a material adverse effect on our financial position, operating results and/or cash flows.
Further, as a result of the Business Combination, we continue to review supporting information and data for purposes of verifying tax amounts reported on legacy Maersk Drilling’s opening balance sheet. As a result of such ongoing review, adjustments to the opening balance sheet may be required in subsequent periods. Such adjustments may impact our consolidated effective income tax rate and tax expense, and these amounts may vary substantially from one reporting period to another.
Fluctuations in exchange rates and nonconvertibility of currencies could result in losses to us.
We may experience currency exchange losses when revenues are received or expenses are paid in nonconvertible currencies, when we do not hedge an exposure to a foreign currency, when the result of a hedge is a loss or if any counterparty to our hedge were to experience financial difficulties. We may also incur losses as a result of an inability to collect revenues due to a shortage of convertible currency available to the country of operation, controls over currency exchange or controls over the repatriation of income or capital.
Inflation may adversely affect our operating results.
Inflationary factors such as increases in labor costs, material costs and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results and cash flows. We have experienced increases in the cost of labor and materials during the year ended December 31, 2022, and we currently expect these inflationary pressures to continue into 2023. A high rate of inflation, including a continuation of inflation at the current rate, may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue, if our dayrates do not increase sufficiently to cover these increased costs.
Pension expenses associated with our retirement benefit plans may fluctuate significantly depending upon changes in actuarial assumptions, future investment performance of plan assets and legislative or other regulatory actions.
A portion of our current and retired employee population is covered by pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, the costs of which are dependent upon various assumptions, including estimates of rates of return on benefit plan assets, discount rates for future payment obligations, mortality assumptions, rates of future cost growth and trends for future costs. In addition, funding requirements for benefit obligations of our pension and other post-retirement benefit plans are subject to legislative and other government regulatory actions. Future changes in estimates and assumptions associated with our pension and other post-retirement benefit plans could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and/or financial disclosures.
Regulatory and Legal Risks
Governmental laws and regulations may add to our costs, result in delays, or limit our drilling activity.
Our business is affected by public policy and laws and regulations relating to the energy industry in the geographic areas where we operate, including laws and regulations relating to the environment, specifically climate change and GHGs.
The drilling industry is dependent on demand for services from the oil and gas exploration and production industry, and accordingly, we are directly affected by the adoption of laws and regulations that for economic, environmental or other policy reasons curtail exploration and development drilling for oil and gas. We may be required to make significant capital expenditures to comply with governmental laws and regulations. Governments in some foreign countries are increasingly active in regulating and controlling the ownership of concessions, the exploration for oil and gas, and other aspects of the oil and gas industries.
There is increasing worldwide attention concerning the issue of climate change and the effect of GHGs and other sustainability and energy rebalancing matters. This increased attention may result in new environmental laws or regulations that may unfavorably impact us, our suppliers and our customers. However, it is not possible at this time to predict the timing and effect of climate related laws and regulations, the adoption of additional GHG legislation, regulations or other measures at the international, federal, state or local levels. For more information on climate change, see Part I, Item 1, “Business—Governmental Regulations and Environmental Matters—Climate Change.”
The modification of existing laws or regulations or the adoption of new laws or regulations that result in the curtailment of exploratory or developmental drilling for oil and gas could materially and adversely affect our operations by limiting drilling opportunities, increasing our cost of doing business, discouraging our customers from drilling for hydrocarbons, disrupting revenue through permitting or similar delays, or subjecting us to liability. For example, on January 20, 2021, the Acting Secretary for the Department of the Interior signed an order effectively suspending new fossil fuel leasing and permitting on federal lands, including in the US Gulf of Mexico, for 60 days. Then on January 27, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order indefinitely suspending new oil and natural gas leases on public lands or in offshore waters pending completion of a comprehensive review and reconsideration of federal oil and gas permitting and leasing practices. In November 2021, the Department of the Interior completed its review and issued a report on the federal oil and gas leasing program. The Department of the Interior’s report recommends several changes to federal leasing practices, including changes to royalty payments, bidding, and bonding requirements.
Several states filed lawsuits challenging the January 2021 suspension and a nationwide temporary injunction from the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana was issued blocking the suspension in July 2021. After appeal and remand by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the US District Court issued a permanent injunction as to the plaintiff states in August 2022. The Department of the Interior since resumed offshore leasing, and was specifically required to conduct leasing by the Inflation Reduction Act, passed in August 2022. However, the Biden Administration continues to evaluate offshore leasing and could impose additional restrictions in the future. For example, the Department of Interior has not yet released a new five-year program for offshore oil and gas leasing between 2023 and 2028. The last draft proposal issued by the Department of the Interior in July 2022 included an option that would preserve the Secretary’s discretion to determine that no outer continental shelf oil and gas lease sales in any planning area should be scheduled during the 2023–2028 period.
The continued focus on restrictive legislation and litigation for the oil and gas industry and the issuance of federal leases or other similar initiatives to reform federal leasing practices result in the development of additional restrictions on offshore drilling, limitations on the availability of offshore leases, or restrictions on the ability to obtain required permits, could have a material adverse impact on our operations by reducing drilling opportunities and the demand for our services.
In addition, efforts have been made and continue to be made in the international community toward the adoption of international treaties or protocols related to climate change and for the imposition of hydrocarbon-based fuel usage reductions, and encouraging the implementation of net-zero GHG emission pledges. Laws or regulations incentivizing or mandating the use of alternative energy sources such as wind power and solar energy have also been enacted in certain jurisdictions. For example, the Inflation Reduction Act includes a variety of tax credits to incentivize development and use of solar, wind, and other alternative energy sources. Numerous large cities globally and a few countries have mandated conversion from internal combustion engine-powered vehicles to electric-powered vehicles and placed restrictions on non-public transportation. Fuel conservation measures, alternative fuel requirements and increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil and gas could reduce demand for oil and gas. These measures are aimed at reducing reliance on and future demand for oil and gas, which could have a material impact on our business.
In recent years, federal, state and local governments have taken steps to reduce emissions of GHGs and encourage decarbonization. The Environmental Protection Agency has finalized a series of GHG monitoring, reporting and emissions control rules, and in 2022, the US Congress adopted legislation to reduce emissions. The Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law in August 2022, includes a Methane Emissions Reduction Program to incentivize methane emission reductions and impose a fee on GHG emissions from certain facilities, including offshore petroleum and natural gas production platforms.
In addition, several states have already taken measures to reduce emissions of GHGs primarily through the development of GHG emission inventories or regional GHG cap-and-trade programs. Recently, several states and local jurisdictions have pledged to remove internal combustion engines from their roads as early as 2035. While we are subject to certain federal GHG monitoring and reporting requirements, our operations currently are not adversely impacted by existing international, federal, state and local climate change initiatives. However, continued development of these recent initiatives or new legislation and regulatory programs to reduce GHG emissions could increase our cost of doing business, discourage our customers from drilling for hydrocarbons, or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Increasing attention to environmental, social and governance matters, including climate change may impact our business and financial results.
In recent years, increasing attention has been given to corporate activities related to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters in public discourse and the investment community. A number of advocacy groups, both domestically and internationally, have campaigned for governmental and private action to promote change at public companies related to ESG matters, including through the investment and voting practices of investment advisers, public pension funds, universities and other members of the investing community. These activities include increasing attention and demands for action related to ESG, climate change and energy rebalancing matters, such as promoting the use of substitutes to fossil fuel products and encouraging the divestment of fossil fuel equities, as well as pressuring lenders and other financial services companies to limit or curtail activities with fossil fuel companies, which could have a material adverse effect on our share price and ability to access equity capital markets. Members of the investment community screen companies such as ours for sustainability performance according to various ESG standards, including practices related to GHGs and climate change. We may experience risks associated with any current or future goals, targets and other objectives related to ESG and sustainability matters. In addition, if we are unable to find economically viable, as well as publicly acceptable, solutions that reduce our GHG emissions and/or GHG intensity for new and existing projects, we could experience additional costs or financial penalties, delayed or cancelled projects, reduced share price, restricted access to financing or capital and/or reduced production and reduced demand for hydrocarbons, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings, cash flows and financial condition.
Any violation of anti-bribery or anti-corruption laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the United Kingdom Bribery Act, or similar laws and regulations could result in significant expenses, divert management attention, and otherwise have a negative impact on us.
We operate in countries known to have a reputation for corruption. We are subject to the risk that we, our affiliated entities or their respective officers, directors, employees and agents may take action determined to be in violation of such anti-corruption laws, including the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (the “FCPA”), the United Kingdom Bribery Act 2010 (the “UK Bribery Act”), the United Kingdom Modern Slavery Act 2015 (the “UK Modern Slavery Act”) and similar laws in other countries. Any violation of the FCPA, UK Bribery Act, UK Slavery Act or other applicable anti-corruption laws could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties and curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions and might adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Further, detecting, investigating and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior management.
Changes in, compliance with, or our failure to comply with the certain laws and regulations may negatively impact our operations and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our operations are subject to various laws and regulations in countries in which we operate, including laws and regulations relating to:
•the environment and the health and safety of personnel;
•the importing, exporting, equipping and operation of drilling rigs;
•currency exchange controls;
•oil and gas exploration and development;
•taxation of offshore earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel; and
•use and compensation of local employees and suppliers by foreign contractors.
Public and governmental scrutiny of the energy industry has resulted in increased regulations being proposed and often implemented. In addition, existing regulations might be revised or reinterpreted, new laws, regulations and permitting requirements might be adopted or become applicable to us, our rigs, our customers, our vendors or our service providers,
and future changes in laws and regulations could significantly increase our costs and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we may be required to post additional surety bonds to secure performance, tax, customs and other obligations relating to our rigs in jurisdictions where bonding requirements are already in effect and in other jurisdictions where we may operate in the future. These requirements would increase the cost of operating in these countries, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
From time to time, new rules, regulations and requirements regarding oil and gas development have been proposed and implemented by BOEM, BSEE or the United States Congress, as well as other jurisdictions outside the United States, that could materially limit or prohibit, and increase the cost of, offshore drilling. For example, in July 2016, BOEM and BSEE finalized a rule revising and adding requirements for drilling on the US Arctic Outer Continental Shelf. Similarly, in April 2016, BSEE announced a final blowout preventer systems and well control rule. BSEE also finalized a rule in September 2016 concerning production safety systems for oil and natural gas operations on the Outer Continental Shelf. BSEE issued final rules amending both the September 2016 production safety systems rule and the April 2016 blowout preventer systems and well control rule in September 2018 and May 2019, respectively. In addition, BOEM released a Notice to Lessees and Operators in the Outer Continental Shelf (“NTL”) in September 2016 that updated offshore bonding requirements. The NTL was only partially implemented before being rescinded and replaced by a proposed rule addressing offshore bonding published in October 2020. However, on January 20, 2021, President Biden issued executive orders freezing the issuance of new rules pending further review and directing all executive departments and agencies to review and consider suspending, revising, or rescinding all regulations issued between January 20, 2017 and January 20, 2021 determined to be inconsistent with President Biden’s environmental and climate goals. Acting on this directive, BSEE announced a proposed rule in September 2022 that would amend the 2019 version of BSEE’s well control rule. The 2022 proposal would revise elements that were amended or rescinded in 2019, including requirements applicable to blowout preventer system operation, failure analyses and investigations, and submittal of information to BSEE. If finalized, this proposed rule could impose additional requirements on our operations. To the extent the other recent proposed and final rules are reviewed and also determined to be inconsistent under the executive orders, BOEM and BSEE could issue new rules reinstating the requirements of the 2016 rules and/or reimplement the NTL.
We are also subject to increasing regulatory requirements and scrutiny in certain jurisdictions and other countries, including the North Sea. New rules, regulations and requirements, or a return to the requirements of the 2016 versions of the BSEE and BOEM regulations, including the adoption of new safety requirements and policies relating to the approval of drilling permits, restrictions on oil and gas development and production activities in the US Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere, implementation of safety and environmental management systems, mandatory third party compliance audits, and the promulgation of numerous Notices to Lessees or similar new regulatory requirements outside of the United States, may impact our operations by causing increased costs, delays and operational restrictions. If new regulations, policies, operating procedures and the possibility of increased legal liability resulting from the adoption or amendment of rules and regulations applicable to our operations in the United States or other jurisdictions are viewed by our current or future customers as a significant impairment to expected profitability on projects, then they could discontinue or curtail their offshore operations in the impacted region, thereby adversely affecting our operations by limiting drilling opportunities or imposing materially increased costs.
We could also be affected by challenges and restrictions to offshore operations by environmental groups, costal states and the federal government. For example, in December 2018, environmental groups challenged incidental harassment authorizations issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service that allow companies to conduct air gun seismic surveys for oil and gas exploration off the Atlantic coast. The attorney generals for ten US coastal states also intervened as plaintiffs. The litigation concluded in October 2020 and the authorizations expired in November 2020. Restrictions on authorizations needed to conduct seismic surveys could impact our customers’ ability to identify oil and gas reserves, thereby reducing demand for our services. Several coastal states have also taken steps to prohibit offshore drilling. For example, California passed laws in September 2018 barring the construction of new oil drilling-related infrastructure in state waters. Similarly, in November 2018, voters in Florida approved an amendment to the state constitution that would ban oil and gas drilling in offshore state waters. In addition, in 2022, California lawmakers introduced a bill that would have banned offshore drilling in state waters, though the bill failed to pass. Such initiatives could reduce opportunities for our customers and thereby reduce demand for our services. In addition, the federal government has taken steps to restrict offshore drilling opportunities.
Adverse effects may continue as a result of the uncertainty of ongoing inquiries, investigations and court proceedings, or additional inquiries and proceedings by federal or state regulatory agencies or private plaintiffs. In addition, we cannot
predict the outcome of any of these inquiries or whether these inquiries will lead to additional legal proceedings against us, civil or criminal fines or penalties, or other regulatory action, including legislation or increased permitting requirements. Legal proceedings or other matters against us, including environmental matters, suits, regulatory appeals, challenges to our permits by citizen groups and similar matters, might result in adverse decisions against us. The result of such adverse decisions, both individually or in the aggregate, could be material and may not be covered fully or at all by insurance.
Our operations are subject to numerous laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and of human health and safety, and compliance with these laws and regulations could impose significant costs and liabilities that exceed our current expectations.
Substantial costs, liabilities, delays and other significant issues could arise from environmental, health and safety laws and regulations covering our operations, and we may incur substantial costs and liabilities in maintaining compliance with such laws and regulations. Our operations are subject to extensive international conventions and treaties, and national or federal, state and local laws and regulations, governing environmental protection, including with respect to the discharge of materials into the environment and the security of chemical and industrial facilities. These laws govern a wide range of environmental issues, including:
•the release of oil, drilling fluids, natural gas or other materials into the environment;
•air emissions from our drilling rigs or our facilities;
•handling, cleanup and remediation of solid and hazardous wastes at our drilling rigs or our facilities or at locations to which we have sent wastes for disposal;
•restrictions on chemicals and other hazardous substances; and
•wildlife protection, including regulations that ensure our activities do not jeopardize endangered or threatened animals, fish and plant species, nor destroy or modify the critical habitat of such species.
Various governmental authorities have the power to enforce compliance with these laws and regulations and the permits issued under them, oftentimes requiring difficult and costly actions. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and permits, or the release of oil or other materials into the environment, may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of remedial obligations, the imposition of stricter conditions on or revocation of permits, the issuance of moratoria or injunctions limiting or preventing some or all of our operations, delays in granting permits and cancellation of leases, or could affect our relationship with certain consumers.
There is an inherent risk of the incurrence of environmental costs and liabilities in our business, some of which may be material, due to the handling of our customers’ hydrocarbon products as they are gathered, transported, processed and stored, air emissions related to our operations, historical industry operations, and water and waste disposal practices. For example, we, as an operator of mobile offshore drilling units in navigable US waters and certain offshore areas, including the US Outer Continental Shelf, are liable for damages and for the cost of removing oil spills for which we may be held responsible, subject to certain limitations. Our operations may involve the use or handling of materials that are classified as environmentally hazardous. Environmental laws and regulations may expose us to liability for the conduct of or conditions caused by others or for acts that were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time they were performed. Joint, several or strict liability may be incurred without regard to fault under certain environmental laws and regulations for the remediation of contaminated areas and in connection with past, present or future spills or releases of natural gas, oil and wastes on, under, or from past, present or future facilities. Private parties may have the right to pursue legal actions to enforce compliance as well as to seek damages for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations or for personal injury or property damage arising from our operations. In addition, increasingly strict laws, regulations and enforcement policies could materially increase our compliance costs and the cost of any remediation that may become necessary. Our insurance may not cover all environmental risks and costs or may not provide sufficient coverage if an environmental claim is made against us.
Our business may be adversely affected by increased costs due to stricter pollution control equipment requirements or liabilities resulting from non-compliance with required operating or other regulatory permits. Also, we might not be able to obtain or maintain from time to time all required environmental regulatory approvals for our operations. If there is a delay in obtaining any required environmental regulatory approvals, or if we fail to obtain and comply with them, the operation or construction of our facilities could be prevented or become subject to additional costs. In addition, the steps we could be required to take to bring certain facilities into regulatory compliance could be prohibitively expensive, and we might be required to shut down, divest or alter the operation of those facilities, which might cause us to incur losses.
We make assumptions and develop expectations about possible expenditures related to environmental conditions based on current laws and regulations and current interpretations of those laws and regulations. If the interpretation of laws or
regulations, or the laws and regulations themselves, change, our assumptions may change, and new capital costs may be incurred to comply with such changes. In addition, new environmental laws and regulations might adversely affect our operations, as well as waste management and air emissions. For instance, governmental agencies could impose additional safety requirements, which could affect our profitability. Further, new environmental laws and regulations might adversely affect our customers, which in turn could affect our profitability.
Finally, although some of our drilling rigs will be separately owned by our subsidiaries, under certain circumstances a parent company and all of the unit-owning affiliates in a group under common control engaged in a joint venture could be held liable for damages or debts owed by one of the affiliates, including liabilities for oil spills under environmental laws. Therefore, it is possible that we could be subject to liability upon a judgment against us or any one of our subsidiaries.
Any failure to comply with the complex laws and regulations governing international trade could adversely affect our operations.
The shipment of goods, services and technology across international borders subjects our business to extensive trade laws and regulations. Import activities are governed by unique customs laws and regulations in each of the countries of operation. Moreover, many countries, including the United States, control the export and re-export of certain goods, services and technology and impose related export recordkeeping and reporting obligations. Governments also may impose economic sanctions against certain countries, persons and other entities that may restrict or prohibit transactions involving such countries, persons and entities. US sanctions, in particular, are targeted against certain countries that are heavily involved in the petroleum and petrochemical industries, which includes drilling activities.
The laws and regulations concerning import activity, export recordkeeping and reporting, export control and economic sanctions are complex and constantly changing. These laws and regulations may be enacted, amended, enforced or interpreted in a manner materially impacting our operations. Shipments can be delayed and denied export or entry for a variety of reasons, some of which are outside our control and some of which may result from failure to comply with existing legal and regulatory regimes. Shipping delays or denials could cause unscheduled operational downtime. Any failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory trading obligations could also result in criminal and civil penalties and sanctions, such as fines, imprisonment, debarment from government contracts, seizure of shipments and loss of import and export privileges.
Currently, we do not, nor do we intend to, operate in countries that are subject to significant sanctions and embargoes imposed by the US government or identified by the US government as state sponsors of terrorism, such as the Crimean region of the Ukraine, Cuba, Iran, North Korea and Syria. The US sanctions and embargo laws and regulations vary in their application, as they do not all apply to the same covered persons or proscribe the same activities, and such sanctions and embargo laws and regulations may be amended or strengthened over time. There can be no assurance that we will be in compliance in the future, particularly as the scope of certain laws may be unclear and may be subject to changing interpretations. Any such violation could result in fines or other penalties and could result in some investors deciding, or being required, to divest their interest, or not to invest, in us. In addition, certain institutional investors may have investment policies or restrictions that prevent them from holding securities of companies that have contracts with countries identified by the US government as state sponsors of terrorism or with countries that are otherwise subject to US sanctions and embargo laws. In addition, our reputation and the market for our securities may be adversely affected if we engage in certain other activities, such as entering into drilling contracts with individuals or entities in countries subject to significant US sanctions and embargo laws that are not controlled by the governments of those countries, or engaging in operations associated with those countries pursuant to contracts with third parties that are unrelated to those countries or entities controlled by their governments.
We are subject to litigation that could have an adverse effect on us.
We are, from time to time, involved in various litigation matters. These matters may include, among other things, contract disputes, personal injury claims, asbestos and other toxic tort claims, environmental claims or proceedings, employment matters, issues related to employee or representative conduct, governmental claims for taxes or duties, and other litigation that arises in the ordinary course of our business. Although we intend to defend or pursue such matters vigorously, we cannot predict with certainty the outcome or effect of any claim or other litigation matter, and there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of any litigation. Litigation may have an adverse effect on us because of potential negative outcomes, legal fees, the allocation of management’s time and attention, and other factors.
We could also face increased climate-related litigation with respect to our operations both in the US and around the world. Governmental and other entities in various US states, such as California and New York, have filed lawsuits against coal, gas
oil and petroleum companies. These suits allege damages as a result of climate change, and the plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages and abatement under various tort theories. Similar lawsuits may be filed in other jurisdictions both in the US and globally. Though we are not currently a party to any such lawsuit, these suits present uncertainty regarding the extent to which companies who are not producing oil or gas, but who are engaged in such production, such as offshore drillers, face an increased risk of liability stemming from climate change, which risk would also adversely impact the oil and gas industry and impact demand for our services.
We are a holding company, and we are dependent upon cash flow from subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates to meet our obligations.
We currently conduct our operations through our subsidiaries, including joint ventures and associates, and our operating income and cash flow are generated by such entities. As a result, cash we obtain from our subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates is the principal source of funds necessary to meet our debt service obligations. Unless they are guarantors of our indebtedness, such entities do not have any obligation to pay amounts due on our indebtedness or to make funds available for that purpose. Contractual provisions or laws, as well as such entities’ financial condition, debt covenants, and operating requirements, may also limit our ability to obtain the cash that we require to pay our debt service obligations. Applicable tax laws may also subject such payments to us by such entities to further taxation.
The warrants we issued pursuant to the Plan, which were converted in connection with the Business Combination with Maersk Drilling, are exercisable for Ordinary Shares, and the exercise of such equity instruments would have a dilutive effect to shareholders of the Company.
On the Emergence Effective Date and pursuant to the Plan, we issued Noble Cayman Tranche 1 Warrants (as defined herein) and Noble Cayman Tranche 2 Warrants (as defined herein) to the holders of Legacy Notes (as defined herein) and Noble Cayman Tranche 3 Warrants (as defined herein) to the holders of Legacy Noble’s ordinary shares outstanding prior to the Emergence Effective Date, of which 6,203,303, 5,548,129 and 2,774,206 are outstanding as of December 31, 2022, respectively. In connection with the Business Combination with Maersk Drilling, each such warrant issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger (the “Merger Effective Time”) was converted automatically into a warrant to acquire a number of Ordinary Shares equal to the number of ordinary shares of Noble Corporation underlying such warrant, with the same terms as were in effect immediately prior to the Merger Effective Time under the terms of the applicable warrant agreements with Noble Corporation. At the Merger Effective Time, we entered into three warrant agreements with respect to the converted warrants, which have substantially similar terms as were in effect immediately prior to the Merger Effective Time pursuant to the agreements with Noble Corporation.
The Tranche 1 Warrants are exercisable for one Ordinary Share per warrant at an exercise price of $19.27 per warrant, the Tranche 2 Warrants are exercisable for one Ordinary Share per warrant at an exercise price of $23.13 per warrant and the Tranche 3 Warrants are exercisable for one Ordinary Share per warrant at an exercise price of $124.40 per warrant (in each case as may be adjusted from time to time pursuant to the applicable warrant agreement). The Tranche 1 Warrants and the Tranche 2 Warrants are exercisable until 5:00 p.m., Eastern time, on February 4, 2028 and the Tranche 3 Warrants are exercisable until 5:00 p.m., Eastern time, on February 4, 2026. The Tranche 1 Warrants and the Tranche 2 Warrants have Black-Scholes protections, including in the event of a Fundamental Transaction (as defined in the applicable warrant agreement). The Tranche 1 Warrants and the Tranche 2 Warrants also provide that while the Mandatory Exercise Condition (as defined in the applicable warrant agreement) set forth in the applicable warrant agreement has occurred and is continuing, Noble or the holders of Tranche 1 Warrants or Tranche 2 Warrants representing at least 20% of the initial outstanding warrants of such tranche (the “Required Mandatory Exercise Warrantholders”) have the right and option (but not the obligation) to cause all or a portion of the warrants to be exercised on a cashless basis. In the case of Noble, under the Mandatory Exercise Condition, all of the Tranche 1 Warrants or the Tranche 2 Warrants (as applicable) would be exercised. In the case of the electing Required Mandatory Exercise Warrantholders, under the Mandatory Exercise Condition, all of their respective Tranche 1 Warrants or Tranche 2 Warrants (as applicable) would be exercised. Mandatory exercises entitle the holder of each warrant subject thereto to (i) the number of Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of such warrant on a cashless basis and (ii) an amount payable in cash, Ordinary Shares or a combination thereof (in Noble’s sole discretion) equal to the Black-Scholes Value (as defined in the applicable warrant agreement) with respect to the number of Ordinary Shares withheld upon exercise of such warrant on a cashless basis. As of March 6, 2023, the Mandatory Exercise Condition set forth in the warrant agreements for the Tranche 1 Warrants and the Tranche 2 Warrants had been satisfied. Between January 1, 2023 and March 6, 2023, an aggregate of 308 Ordinary Shares were issued pursuant to Tranche 1 Warrants, Tranche 2 Warrants, and Tranche 3 Warrants pursuant to all exercises. These exercises, and continued exercises of these warrants into Ordinary Shares pursuant to the terms of the outstanding warrants, will have a dilutive
effect to the holdings of our existing shareholders. A significant reduction in the Company’s warrant liability primarily driven by share price volatility may result in a material incremental cash tax expense to the Company.
Future sales or the availability for sale of substantial amounts of the Ordinary Shares, or the perception that these sales may occur, could adversely affect the trading price of the Ordinary Shares and could impair our ability to raise capital through future sales of equity securities.
As of March 6, 2023, there were 134,820,112 Ordinary Shares outstanding. In addition, as of March 6, 2023, 6,203,133 Tranche 1 Warrants, 5,547,974 Tranche 2 Warrants and 2,774,204 Tranche 3 Warrants were outstanding and exercisable. We also have 2,075,225 Ordinary Shares authorized and reserved for issuance pursuant to equity awards under the Noble Corporation plc 2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
A large percentage of the Ordinary Shares (or warrants exercisable for Ordinary Shares) are held by a relatively small number of investors.
Sales of a substantial number of the Ordinary Shares in the public markets, exercise of a substantial number of warrants or even the perception that these sales or exercises might occur, could impair our ability to raise capital for our operations through a future sale of, or pay for acquisitions using, our equity securities.
We may issue Ordinary Shares or other securities from time to time as consideration for future acquisitions and investments. If any such acquisition or investment is significant, the number of Ordinary Shares, or the number or aggregate principal amount, as the case may be, of other securities that we may issue may in turn be substantial. We may also grant registration rights covering those Ordinary Shares or other securities in connection with any such acquisitions and investments. For example, in connection with the Business Combination with Maersk Drilling, we issued a significant number of Ordinary Shares as consideration and granted registration rights to a recipient thereof, pursuant to which we have filed a registration statement with the SEC to facilitate potential future sales of such Ordinary Shares by them.
We cannot predict the effect that future sales of Ordinary Shares will have on the price at which the Ordinary Shares trades or the size of future issuances of Ordinary Shares or the effect, if any, that future issuances will have on the market price of the Ordinary Shares. Sales of substantial amounts of the Ordinary Shares, or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect the trading price of the Ordinary Shares.