Item 1. Business
Fluor is building a better world by applying our world-class expertise to solve our clients' greatest challenges. We provide professional and technical solutions that deliver safe, well-executed, capital-efficient projects to our clients around the globe. Fluor Corporation was incorporated in Delaware in September 2000. However, through our predecessors, we have been in business for more than 110 years, providing services that have formed the essential building blocks of development and progress over that time. We believe we are poised to continue helping our clients meet similar needs into the foreseeable future.
Acting through our many subsidiaries and interests in joint ventures, we are one of the larger global professional services firms providing EPC, fabrication and modularization, and project management services. We provide these services to our clients in diverse industries worldwide including advanced technologies and manufacturing, chemicals, infrastructure, life sciences, LNG, mining and metals, nuclear project services, energy transition, and oil and gas production and fuels. We are also a service provider to the U.S. federal government and governments abroad.
We operate our business through 3 principal segments: Urban Solutions, Energy Solutions and Mission Solutions. We also have smaller operations which we report as our Other segment.
Strategic Priorities
We are guided by 4 strategic priorities for driving value creation for our shareholders:
•Drive growth across our portfolio, by diversifying into markets outside of the traditional oil and gas sector, including advanced technology and life sciences, high-demand metals, energy transition, infrastructure and nuclear and civil, defense and intelligence for governments;
•Pursue contracts with fair and balanced commercial terms, focusing on more favorable, risk-adjusted agreements that reward Fluor for delivering value to our clients and better share certain execution risk more equitably;
•Reinforce financial discipline, protecting our capital structure by generating predictable cash flow and earnings with right-sized cost structure; and
•Foster a high-performance culture of project delivery, through excellence in execution, which brings value to all our stakeholders.
In 2024, we made substantial progress on our strategic priorities. Notably, 78% of our revenue was derived from markets outside of our traditional oil and gas markets. As of December 31, 2024, 79% of our backlog is reimbursable.
Our Core Values
Our Core Values serve as our behavioral compass, guiding all of our actions. They are not only what we believe, they are the foundation of how we achieve our purpose to build a better world.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SAFETY | | INTEGRITY | | TEAMWORK | | EXCELLENCE |
We care for each other | | We do what is right | | We work better together | | We deliver solutions |
Safer TogetherSM promotes the well-being of all people, our communities and the environment. | | Trust, accountability and fairness define our character. | | Collectively we thrive when we include, respect and empower one another. | | Our high-performance teams embrace opportunities, solve challenges and continuously improve. |
Competitive Strengths
As a world-class provider of technical and professional services, we believe that we bring capital efficient business solutions to our clients. We believe that our business advantages and global positioning provide us with significant competitive strengths, including:
Safety. Maintaining a safe and secure workplace is a key business driver for us and our clients. In our experience, whether in an office or at a jobsite, a safe environment decreases risks, provides for the well-being of all workers, enhances morale, improves productivity, reduces project cost and generally improves client relationships. We believe that our safety culture is one of our most distinguishing features.
Global Execution Platform. As one of the larger publicly traded EPC companies, we have a global footprint with employees located throughout the world. Our global presence enables us to establish local relationships, capitalize on opportunities, and mobilize quickly to project sites, leveraging our local knowledge and talent pools. We regularly form strategic alliances with local partners, utilize our supply chain expertise, and emphasize local training programs. We also provide high quality services from our distributed execution centers on a cost-efficient basis.
Excellence in Execution. We believe that our ability to execute, maintain and manage complex projects, large or small and often in geographically challenging locations, gives us a distinct competitive advantage. We strive to complete our projects meeting or exceeding all client specifications. We have continued to improve our data-driven execution, which has enhanced our ability to meet our clients' needs.
Market Diversity. We offer services across a wide range of industries globally. This diversification helps mitigate the impact of market cyclicality and enables us to strive for more consistent growth. We believe that maintaining a balanced business portfolio allows us to focus on our more stable markets while capitalizing on cyclical or emerging markets when the timing is appropriate.
Client Relationships. We actively pursue relationships with new clients while also building on our long-term relationships with existing clients. We believe that long-term relationships with existing clients serve us well by allowing us to better understand and be more responsive to their requirements. Whether our clients are new or have been with us for many decades, our ability to successfully foster and maintain relationships remains a key strength.
Risk Management. We believe we have the ability to assess, mitigate and manage project risk, particularly in challenging locations or circumstances. Our experienced management and execution team employs a systematic and disciplined approach to identifying, assessing and managing risks. We believe that this risk management approach helps us control costs and adhere to clients' schedules.
Sustainability. Our sustainability charter is to conduct business with social, economic and environmental responsibility. Sustainability is integrated into our business practices, and our employees are engaged in delivery on our charter, enabling us to build and sustain the global community and provide value for our stakeholders.
General Operations
Our services fall into 6 broad categories and can range from basic consulting activities, often at the early stages of a project, to complete design-build, operations and maintenance contracts.
•In engineering and design, we develop solutions to address our clients’ most complex challenges. Our engineering services encompass traditional engineering disciplines such as piping, mechanical, electrical, control systems, civil, structural and architectural, as well as advanced engineering specialties including process engineering, chemical engineering, simulation, integrated automation processes and interactive 3-D modeling. Through our design solutions, we offer a range of services including front-end engineering, conceptual design, estimating, feasibility studies, permitting, process simulation, technology and licensing evaluation, scope definition and siting.
•Project management involves managing all aspects of the effort to deliver projects on schedule and within budget, and is critical on every project. We are often hired as the overall program manager for large, complex projects involving multiple contractors and subcontractors, requiring the integration of various activities into a cohesive execution plan. Our project management services include logistics, development of project execution plans, detailed schedules, cost forecasts, progress tracking and reporting, and the integration of EPC efforts. This approach helps us meet our clients' safety, functionality and financial performance requirements.
•Our procurement offerings provide supply chain solutions aimed at improving product quality and performance while reducing project costs and schedules. Clients benefit from our global sourcing and supply expertise, purchasing power, technical knowledge, processes, systems and experienced global resources. Our procurement activities include strategic sourcing, material management, contracts management, buying, expediting, supplier quality inspection and logistics.
•In construction, we mobilize, execute and commission projects on a self-perform and/or subcontracted basis. We are generally responsible for project completion, often in difficult locations and under challenging circumstances. We are frequently designated as program manager, and serve as such in cases where the client has facilities in multiple locations, complex phases in a single project location, or a large-scale investment in one facility.
•We offer operations and maintenance services designed to enhance the efficiency or extend the life of our clients’ facilities. These services may include facility management, technical facility operations, plant readiness, commissioning, start-up and maintenance technology, small capital projects, turnaround and outage services and recapitalization of facilities and infrastructure. Additionally, we can provide key management, staffing and management skills to clients on-site at their facilities.
•We also offer a variety of fabrication and modularization services, including integrated engineering and modular fabrication and assembly, as well as modular construction and asset support services to clients through our joint ventures. By leveraging internal and third-party capabilities in key regions, we help clients achieve cost and schedule savings by reducing on-site craft needs and shifting work to inherently safer and more controlled work environments.
Business Segments
Urban Solutions
We believe that continued urbanization is driving demand for innovative and sustainable solutions in advanced technologies and manufacturing, life sciences, mining and metals, infrastructure and professional staffing project teams. Urban Solutions includes businesses to meet our clients' needs in these evolving and growing markets.
For the advanced technologies and manufacturing market, we provide front-end engineering, program management and EPC services to a diverse range of companies globally. Our experience spans a wide variety of market segments, including advanced materials, data centers, semiconductors, smart batteries, fast-moving consumer goods, food and beverage and specialty products. We specialize in designing projects that incorporate lean manufacturing concepts and our clients focus on solutions that accelerate time to market.
In life sciences, we offer front-end studies and EPC services to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and animal health industries. We also specialize in providing validation and commissioning services, bringing new facilities online and extending the life or improving the capabilities of existing facilities. We believe our ability to complete large-scale projects, especially where time to market is critical, enables us to better serve our clients and is a key competitive advantage.
In mining and metals, we provide a comprehensive range of services to clients producing various commodities, including copper, lithium, rare earth minerals, iron ore, bauxite, alumina, aluminum, steel, diamond, gold and fertilizers. We support clients in meeting the growing demand for copper and battery metals, including lithium, platinum and nickel. We also serve the fertilizer industry and provide services in the downstream metals market. Our services include conceptual and feasibility studies through detailed EPC, commissioning and startup support. Many of our opportunities are in remote and logistically challenging environments, such as the Andes Mountains, Western Australia and Africa. We believe we are one of the few companies with the size, regional presence and experience to execute large scale mining and metals projects, regardless of location.
In infrastructure, we support the development of projects with a focus on state departments of transportation. We provide a broad range of services, including consulting, design, planning, financial structuring, engineering, construction and operation and maintenance services, often delivered under joint ventures with other companies. Continuing urbanization and the replacement and expansion of aging infrastructure in North America continues to drive project opportunities.
The segment's staffing services are often provided through TRS Staffing Solutions®, a global staffing specialist that supplies us and third-party clients with technical, professional and craft resources either on a contract or more permanent placement basis.
In North America, Plant & Facility Services provides clients with a comprehensive suite of outsourced and consultative reliability and maintenance services, focusing on power generation and the industrial manufacturing sector.
Energy Solutions
We are a partner in the production of safer, cleaner and sustainable solutions to meet the world's increasing energy and chemicals demand. Our Energy Solutions segment offers EPC services for traditional oil and gas markets, including the production and fuels, chemicals, LNG and power markets. We serve clients in these industries with comprehensive project life-cycle services, including expansion and modernization projects as well as in sustaining capital work. Our extensive skill set also supports energy transition markets, including nuclear power and other low-carbon energy sources, asset decarbonization, carbon capture, renewable fuels, waste-to-energy, green chemicals and hydrogen.
While we undertake projects of varying sizes and scopes, we believe that one of our distinguishing features is our global strength and experience in executing very large projects in challenging locations. As energy and chemicals projects have become more geographically and geopolitically complex, we believe clients will continue to rely on us to manage these projects, leveraging our size, strength, global reach, experience, technical expertise and proven track record.
Our role varies with each project. We may provide front-end engineering, program management and final design services, construction management services, self-perform construction, or oversight of other contractors. We may also assume responsibility for procuring materials, equipment and subcontractors. We have the capacity to design, fabricate and construct new facilities, upgrade, optimize, modernize and expand existing facilities. We also provide consulting services ranging from feasibility studies to process assessments to project finance structuring.
In production and fuels, we execute projects for the oil and gas production, processing and refining industries, including energy transition. In the upstream sector, our projects typically involve the production, processing and transporting of oil and gas, including infrastructure development for major new fields and pipelines. We are also involved in offshore production facilities and gas processing projects. In the downstream sector, our clients are modernizing and modifying existing refineries to increase capacity, improve margins and reduce environmental impact. We are active in repurposing existing refining facilities for renewable fuel production and focusing on other transition markets, such as carbon capture and sequestration, blue and green hydrogen, ammonia and other low carbon solutions, as clients and countries implement sustainable energy goals.
We have been very active for several decades in the chemicals and petrochemicals market, with major projects in the ethylene-based markets and various specialty chemicals. We are also involved in battery chemicals projects and implementing lower carbon solutions on existing and new chemical facilities.
In LNG and power, we have participated in a wide range of LNG developments, including liquefaction, floating LNG facilities, mid-scale LNG solutions and regasification terminals. Our work in LNG includes feasibility studies, technology evaluations, process equipment optimization and selection, basic design, front-end engineering and design, detailed EPC and start-up assistance. In the power market, we can provide a full range of services utilizing small modular and conventional nuclear reactor technologies, as well as solutions utilizing thermal power sources.
Mission Solutions
Mission Solutions provides high-end technical solutions to the U.S. and other governments. We believe the segment's nuclear and environmental business holds a tier 1 position with differentiated expertise in managing complex national security missions across the Department of Energy and the National Nuclear Security Administration. We deliver solutions for nuclear security and operations, nuclear waste management and laboratory management. Additionally, we are an industry leader in nuclear remediation at governmental facilities providing site management, environmental remediation, and decommissioning of facilities, successfully addressing environmental and regulatory challenges associated with nuclear sites. We also provide services to commercial nuclear clients. In civil services, we are a partner to FEMA for disaster recovery and emergency response.
In our national security business, we deliver operations and maintenance, global logistics, EPC, life support and operations of mission-critical facilities across U.S. military service organizations. We can rapidly mobilize people and equipment to deliver solutions globally, often in harsh environments. We are capable of delivering solutions to our military clients irrespective of the location or the speed required. We also offer a bench of security-cleared personnel providing critical solutions to clients in the intelligence community, including data center management, operations and maintenance of secure facilities and technology platform services. We construct and renovate secure facilities around the world for various agencies in support of their enduring missions.
Other
Our Other operations principally include NuScale, in which Fluor is a substantial investor, and the remaining operations of Stork. NuScale has developed SMR technology that is NRC approved, which we believe will be important in the development of light water, passively safe SMRs. They remain an early-stage business that bears significant expenses and losses to advance toward commercialization of their reactor technology. NuScale's success is yielding opportunities for our Energy Solutions segment.
Beginning in October 2024, based principally on their equity sales, we no longer met the criteria to consolidate NuScale. As a consequence, their results for all periods prior to October 2024 were consolidated, but we deconsolidated NuScale after that date and recognized a pre-tax gain of $1.6 billion in the fourth quarter of 2024, based on a stock price of $13.15 for our 126 million shares. We recognize the fair value of our investment in NuScale on a mark-to-market basis based upon the
prevailing price of their stock on our balance sheet dates, which resulted in an additional pre-tax gain of $604 million for the fourth quarter of 2024.
In the first quarter of 2024, we completed the sale of Stork's operations in continental Europe. During April 2024, we also entered into a definitive agreement to sell Stork's U.K. operations, which we completed in the first quarter of 2025. The sale did not meet the requirements for discontinued operations as of December 31, 2024 and will not have a material impact on the financial statements. In the third quarter of 2024, we decided to close our Stork operations in Trinidad and Tobago which required us to take a $7 million severance charge. After completing the wind down of the Trinidad and Tobago operations, Stork's divestiture will be complete.
Other Matters
Types of Contracts
While the basic terms and conditions of the contracts that we perform may vary considerably, we typically perform our work under two broad types of contracts: (a) reimbursable contracts and (b) lump-sum or guaranteed maximum contracts. In some limited markets, we are seeing hybrid contracts containing both lump-sum and reimbursable elements. For our material hybrid contracts, we split the contract and report backlog based on both the lump-sum and reimbursable elements. As of December 31, 2024, the following table summarizes contract type within our ending backlog:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, | | December 31, |
(in millions) | 2024 | | 2023 |
Reimbursable | $ | 22,589 | | 79 | % | | $ | 22,302 | | 76 | % |
Lump-Sum and Guaranteed Maximum | 5,895 | | 21 | % | | 7,139 | | 24 | % |
In accordance with industry practice, most of our contracts are subject to termination at the discretion of our client. In such situations, our contracts typically provide for the payment of fees earned through the date of termination and the reimbursement of other costs incurred including demobilization costs. During 2024, we saw elevated client-directed cancellations and deferrals when compared to recent years, which impacted our fourth quarter results and are expected to impact the first half of 2025.
Under reimbursable contracts, the client reimburses us based upon negotiated rates and fees. Our profit may be in the form of a fee, a simple markup applied to labor cost incurred in performing the contract, or a combination of the two. The fee element may also vary. The fee may be an incentive fee based upon achieving certain performance factors, milestones or targets; it may be a fixed amount in the contract; or it may be based upon a percentage of the cost incurred. In some cases, reimbursable contracts may be converted into lump-sum contracts. Reimbursable contracts may include significant estimated amounts of CFM.
Mission Solutions, primarily acting as a prime contractor or a major subcontractor for a number of government programs, generally performs its services under reimbursable contracts subject to applicable statutes and regulations. In many cases, these contracts include incentive fee arrangements. The programs may span many years and may be implemented by awards under multiple contracts. Some of our government contracts are known as indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (“IDIQ”) agreements. Under these arrangements, we work closely with the government to define the scope and amount of work required based upon an estimate of the maximum amount that the government desires to spend. While the scope is often not initially fully defined or does not require any specific amount of work, once the project scope is determined, additional work may be awarded to us without the need for further competitive bidding.
Under lump-sum contracts, we may bid based upon preliminary engineering drawings and specifications provided by the client. This type of contracting presents risk because, among other things, it requires us to predetermine the work to be performed, the project execution schedule and all costs associated with the work based on incomplete information, all of which requires us to make pricing assumptions based on judgment informed by prior experience on other projects. This risk may be greater when we provide a lump-sum bid in competition with other contractors because we may not be selected for the work if our bid is higher than the competition. Another type of lump-sum contract is a negotiated fixed-price contract, under which we are selected as contractor first and then negotiate a lump-sum price with the client. This may reduce the risk associated with bidding in competition. Furthermore, negotiated fixed-price contracts may occur under a compensation model in which we perform some of the early work on a project, including to advance the engineering, on a reimbursable basis before agreeing upon and converting to a lump-sum price for the remainder of the project. Depending upon when a project converts from reimbursable to lump-sum, our risk may lessen because we may hold greater insight into the details of the project scope, engineering and schedule thereby reducing the number and character of the pricing assumptions in the agreed-upon lump-sum price. Another type of lump-sum contract is a unit price contract under which we are paid a set amount for every “unit” of work performed. If we perform well under any type of lump-sum contract, we can benefit from
cost savings gained from the effects of our efficiencies. However, if the project does not proceed as originally planned, we strive to develop timely change orders, but we may not be able to recover cost overruns, which may cause us to lose money.
Guaranteed maximum price contracts are reimbursable contracts except that the total fee plus the total cost cannot exceed an agreed upon guaranteed maximum price. We can be responsible for some or all of the total cost of the project if the cost exceeds the guaranteed maximum price. Where the total cost is less than the negotiated guaranteed maximum price, we may receive the benefit of the cost savings based upon the terms of the contract.
Some of our contracts, regardless of type, may operate under joint ventures or other teaming arrangements. Typically, we prefer to enter into these arrangements with companies with whom we have worked previously. These arrangements are generally made to strengthen our market position or technical skills, or where the size, scale or location of the project directs the use of such arrangements.
Competition
The markets served by our business are highly competitive and, for the most part, require substantial resources and highly skilled and experienced technical personnel. A large number of companies compete against us, including U.S.-based companies such as AECOM, Amentum Services, Inc., Bechtel Group, Inc., Black & Veatch, Burns & McDonnell, BWXT Technologies, Inc., EMCOR Group, Inc., Jacobs Solutions, Inc., KBR, Inc., Kiewit Corporation, Parsons Corporation, Turner Construction Company, V2X, Inc. and Zachry Group, and international-based companies such as ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios, Balfour Beatty plc, Chiyoda Corporation, Exyte GmbH, Hatch Ltd., JGC Corporation, Petrofac Limited, AtkinsRéalis, Technip Energies N.V., Wood Group plc, and WorleyParsons Limited.
Competition for our Energy Solutions and Urban Solutions segments is based on an ability to provide the design, engineering, planning, management and project execution skills required to complete complex projects in a safe, timely and cost-efficient manner. We believe our engineering, procurement, fabrication and construction business derives its competitive strength from our market diversity, excellence in execution, reputation for quality, technology, cost-effectiveness, worldwide procurement capability, project management expertise, geographic coverage, ability to meet client requirements by performing construction on either a union or an open shop basis, ability to execute complex projects of varying sizes, strong safety record and lengthy experience with a wide range of services and technologies.
The temporary staffing business is a highly fragmented market with over 1,000 companies competing globally. The key competitive factors in this business line are price, service, quality, client relationships, breadth of service and the ability to identify and retain qualified personnel and geographic coverage.
In our Mission Solutions segment, key competitive factors are primarily centered on performance, qualified personnel with appropriate clearance credentials and the ability to provide the design, engineering, planning, management and project execution skills required to complete complex projects in a safe, timely, cost-efficient and compliant manner.
Significant Clients
For 2024, revenue earned from agencies of the U.S. government accounted for 16% of our total revenue. We perform work for these government agencies under multiple contracts and sometimes through joint venture arrangements. No other client accounted for more than 10 percent of our revenues in 2024.
Raw Materials
The principal products we use in our business include structural steel, metal plate, concrete, cable and various electrical and mechanical components. These products and components are subject to raw material (aluminum, copper, nickel, iron ore, etc.) availability and pricing fluctuations, which we monitor on a regular basis. We have access to numerous global supply sources; however, the availability and cost of these products, components and raw materials may vary significantly from year to year due to various factors including the logistics market, client demand, producer capacity, inflation, market conditions and specific material shortages. Our pursuit of balanced contractual risk and implementation of various risk mitigation strategies often permits us to minimize such market-driven impacts on our contracts.
Intellectual Property
We have developed, acquired or otherwise have the right to license technology, know-how, and other proprietary rights that we maintain and protect using a variety of IP protections including patents, trade secrets, and contractual terms in commercial agreements, including confidentiality and license agreements. The various forms of protection are relied upon to support our technology offerings, such as our carbon capture and sulfur recovery service offerings.
Seasonality
Our operations can be subject to seasonal and other variations. These variations are influenced by, among other things, weather, customer spending patterns, bidding seasons, receipt of required regulatory approvals, project timing and schedules, and holidays. For example, harsher weather conditions in winter may impact our ability to complete work in parts of North America and the holiday season schedule affects our productivity during this period. For these reasons, coupled with the number and significance of client contracts commenced and completed during a particular period, as well as the timing of expenses incurred for corporate initiatives, it is not unusual for us to experience seasonal changes or fluctuations in our quarterly operating results.
Compliance with Government Regulations
Environmental, Health and Safety
We operate at sites throughout the world, some of which involve activities related to nuclear facilities, hazardous waste, hydrocarbon production, distribution and transport, the military and infrastructure. Some of our work can be performed adjacent to environmentally sensitive locations such as wetlands, lakes and rivers. We also contract with governments to remediate hazardous materials, including chemical agents, as well as to decontaminate and decommission nuclear sites. These activities can require us to manage, handle, remove, treat, transport and dispose of toxic, radioactive or hazardous substances, and are subject to many environmental, health and safety laws and regulations.
We believe that we are compliant with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. We further believe that any reserves associated with future environmental costs are adequate and that any future costs will not have a material effect on our financial position or future results of operations. Some factors, however, could result in the recognition of additional expense. These include the imposition of more stringent requirements under environmental laws or regulations, new developments or changes regarding site cleanup costs or the allocation of such costs among potentially responsible parties, or a determination that we are potentially responsible for the release of hazardous substances at sites other than those currently identified.
Government Procurement
The services we provide to the U.S. federal government are subject to Federal Acquisition Regulation, the Truth in Negotiations Act, Cost Accounting Standards, the Services Contract Act, False Claims Act, export controls rules and Department of Defense security regulations, as well as many other laws and regulations. These laws and regulations affect how we transact business with our clients and, in some instances, impose additional costs on our business operations. A violation of specific laws and regulations could lead to fines, contract termination or suspension of future contracts. Our government clients can also terminate, renegotiate, or modify any of their contracts with us at their convenience; and many of our government contracts are subject to renewal or extension annually.
Anti-Bribery and Other Regulations
We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, and similar anti-bribery laws, which generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. To the extent we export technical services, data and products outside of the U.S., we are subject to U.S. and international laws and regulations governing international trade and exports, including, but not limited to, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, the Export Administration Regulations, and trade sanctions against embargoed countries. We provide services to the Department of Defense and other defense-related entities that often require specialized professional qualifications and security clearances. In addition, as engineering design services professionals, we are subject to a variety of local, state, federal, and foreign licensing and permit requirements and ethics rules.
Human Capital
The following summarizes our human capital information as of December 31, 2024:
| | | | | |
| Number of Employees |
Salaried employees | 19,296 | |
Craft and hourly employees | 5,617 | |
TRS agency | 1,953 | |
Total | 26,866 | |
The number of craft and hourly employees can vary in relation to the number, size and phase of execution of our projects. Total headcount reflects an 11% reduction from last year, primarily due to the sale of our Stork business in continental Europe.
We have employees in the following regions:
| | | | | | | | |
Region | | % of Global Workforce |
North America | | 52 | % |
Europe, Africa and Middle East | | 24 | % |
Central and South America | | 4 | % |
Asia Pacific (includes Australia) | | 20 | % |
Health and Safety
Safety is one of our core values. We are committed to taking care of our employees and preventing injuries in our offices and project locations. Our robust programs and procedures help us mitigate the hazards inherent in the work we do. We are committed to fostering a caring, preventive culture founded on proactive action by engaged employees. We call this Safer TogetherSM. Our 2024 safety performance, calculated in accordance with U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) record keeping requirements, resulted in a total case incident rate of 0.31, which outperformed our goal of less than 0.38 and was well below comparable industry benchmarks. We also provide resources to improve employee wellbeing including mental health awareness campaigns, our global Employee Assistance Program, site-specific wellbeing programs, and suicide prevention and mental health first aid training.
Development Opportunities
One of our top priorities is to provide ongoing training and development for our employees through multiple avenues. In 2024, we extended our catalog of leadership development offerings and methods of delivery. This included delivery of critical learning opportunities to our executives, project execution and functional employees based in offices, remote locations and project field assignments. Additionally, employees can access Fluor University, our online platform, where they select from a wide variety of self-paced, online, virtual and instructor-led training courses. Topics range from our internally developed courses focused on discipline-specific training, to commercially available technical learning and general knowledge topics, such as leadership, business acumen and communication. In 2024, our employees received nearly 213,000 hours of training through Fluor University, up 60% compared to 2023. In 2024, we also rolled out comprehensive global initiatives targeted specifically for managers, including quarterly webinars on talent topics, monthly orientation training for new managers and a standardized resource toolkit for consistent talent development.
Community Responsibility
As part of our culture, we offer our employees robust and enriching opportunities to help meet our goal of building a better world. In 2024, Fluor and our Fluor Foundation contributed $5 million to global charitable initiatives, improving communities where we live and operate. Through our employee giving and volunteering program, Fluor Cares, we empower our employees to invest in organizations and causes that resonate with them. This employee-driven giving and volunteering effort contributed an additional $5 million in 2024. Further, employees volunteered nearly 49,000 hours to enrich the lives of their neighbors in need.
We have longstanding global programs and local efforts tailored to the needs of the communities where we operate. Through our charitable partners and the volunteerism of our employees, we delivered more than 740,000 hours of STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) instruction and provided workforce development to 7,100 individuals to help inspire and prepare the next-generation workforce. We provided 800,000 meals to the hungry. We planted 44,000 trees, including large scale, multi-year efforts in 4 countries.
Information about our Executive Officers
The following information is being furnished with respect to our executive officers as of January 31, 2025:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | | Age | | Position with the Company (1) |
Michael E. Alexander | | 55 | | Group President, Energy Solutions |
Joseph L. Brennan | | 57 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
James R. Breuer | | 56 | | Chief Operating Officer |
Alvin C. Collins III | | 51 | | Group President, Corporate Development and Sustainability |
David E. Constable | | 63 | | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
Thomas P. D'Agostino | | 66 | | Group President, Mission Solutions |
Stacy L. Dillow | | 51 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer |
Mark E. Fields | | 66 | | Group President, Project Execution |
Kevin B. Hammonds | | 53 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer |
Anthony Morgan | | 58 | | Group President, Urban Solutions |
John C. Regan | | 55 | | Executive Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
_______________________________________________________________________________
(1)All references are to positions held with Fluor Corporation. All officers serve in their respective capacities at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.
Michael E. Alexander
Mr. Alexander has been Group President, Energy Solutions since August 2024. Prior to that, he was President, Chemicals from 2019 to 2024 and President, Energy & Chemicals — Americas in 2019. He joined the company in 1991.
Joseph L. Brennan
Mr. Brennan has been Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2020. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President and Operations Controller in 2020, Senior Vice President and Segment Controller — Energy & Chemicals from 2018 to 2020. Mr. Brennan joined the company in 1991. Effective March 1, 2025, Mr. Brennan will step down as Chief Financial Officer and is expected to retire on July 1, 2025.
James R. Breuer
Mr. Breuer has been Chief Operating Officer since August 2024. Prior to that, he was Group President, Energy Solutions from 2021 to 2024, President, Downstream — Energy & Chemicals from 2019 to 2021 and Vice President and General Manager, South America — Mining & Metals from 2017 to 2019. Mr. Breuer joined the company in 1993. Effective May 1, 2025, Mr. Breuer will become our Chief Executive Officer.
Alvin C. Collins III
Mr. Collins has been Group President, Corporate Development and Sustainability since January 2021. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President, Operations — Energy & Chemicals from 2019 to 2021, Senior Vice President, Global Business Development — Energy & Chemicals in 2019 and Senior Vice President, Operations in Europe, Africa and the Middle East — Energy & Chemicals from 2016 to 2019. Mr. Collins joined the company in 1994. Effective March 1, 2025, Mr. Collins will become Group President, Mission Solutions.
David E. Constable
Mr. Constable has been Chief Executive Officer since January 2021, after serving as a member of Fluor's Board of Directors since 2019. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer (from 2011) and Chief Executive Officer and President (from 2014) of Sasol Ltd., an integrated energy and chemical company, until 2016. Mr. Constable first joined the company in 1982. Mr. Constable was appointed Chairman of the Board in May 2022. Mr. Constable will cease to serve as Chief Executive Officer effective May 1, 2025. He will continue to serve as Executive Chairman of the Board.
Thomas P. D'Agostino
Mr. D'Agostino has been Group President, Mission Solutions since January 2021. Prior to that, he was Group President, Government from 2017 to 2021. Mr. D'Agostino joined the company in 2013. Effective March 1, 2025, Mr. D'Agostino will step down as Group President, Mission Solutions and is expected to retire on April 1, 2025.
Stacy L. Dillow
Ms. Dillow has been Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since 2019. Prior to that, she was Head of Supply Chain Transformation, Southeast Asia and Australasia at Unilever, a consumer goods company, from 2018 to 2019. Ms. Dillow first joined the company in 1996.
Mark E. Fields
Mr. Fields has been Group President, Project Execution since January 2021. Prior to that, he was Group President, Energy & Chemicals from 2019 to 2021 and Senior Vice President, Energy & Chemicals — Americas from 2017 to 2019. Mr. Fields joined the company in 1981.
Kevin B. Hammonds
Mr. Hammonds has been Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer since August 2024. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President, Managing General Counsel from 2020 to 2024 and Vice President, General Counsel from 2014 to 2020. He joined the company in 1996.
Anthony Morgan
Mr. Morgan has been Group President, Urban Solutions since January 2024. Prior to that, he was President, Mining & Metals from 2017 to 2023. Mr. Morgan joined the company in 1990.
John C. Regan
Mr. Regan has been Executive Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer since June 2020. He was previously Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Alta Mesa Resources, Inc., an upstream exploration and production company, from 2019 to 2020. Mr. Regan is a Certified Public Accountant recognized by the State of Texas. Effective March 1, 2025, Mr. Regan will become our Chief Financial Officer.
Available Information
Our website address is www.fluor.com, where we provide free electronic copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports on the “Investor Relations” section as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with, or furnish them to, the SEC. These reports, and any amendments to them, are also available at the SEC's website, www.sec.gov. We also use our investor relations website as a channel of distribution for important company information. Investors and others can receive notifications of new information posted on our investor relations website in real time by signing up for e-mail alerts and RSS feeds. We also maintain information on our website related to our corporate governance including our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board Committee Charters and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Members of the Board of Directors.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We operate in a complex and rapidly changing global environment that involves numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and stock price. The risks described below highlight some of the factors that have affected and could affect us in the future. We may also be affected by unknown risks or risks that we currently think are immaterial. If any such events actually occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and stock price could be materially adversely affected. Some of the factors, events, and contingencies discussed below may have occurred in the past, and the disclosures below are not representations as to whether or not the factors, events or contingencies have occurred in the past, but are provided because future occurrences of such factors, events, or contingencies could have a material adverse effect.
Summary Risk Factors
The following summarizes the risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operation and stock price. You should read this summary together with the more detailed description of each risk factor contained below.
Risks Related to our Operations
•We are vulnerable to the cyclical nature of the markets we serve.
•Our revenue and earnings are largely dependent on new awards.
•The nature of our contracts, particularly our lump-sum contracts, subject us to risks associated with delays and cost overruns, which may not be fully recoverable and may result in reduced profits or losses that could have a material
impact on us.
•Intense competition in the EPC industry can impact our revenue and profits.
•Our ability to operate profitably requires us to hire and retain qualified personnel.
•The success of teaming arrangements and joint ventures depends on the satisfactory performance by our venture partners over whom we may have little or no control, and the failure of those partners to perform their obligations could impose additional obligations on us that could have a material impact on us.
•We are dependent upon suppliers and subcontractors to complete many of our contracts.
•Cybersecurity breaches of our systems and IT could adversely impact us.
•Systems and IT interruption, as well as new systems implementation, could adversely impact our ability to operate.
•We may use artificial intelligence, machine learning, data science and similar technologies in our business, and challenges with properly managing such technologies could result in reputational harm, competitive harm, and legal liability, and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
•We have international operations that are subject to foreign economic and political uncertainties and risks. Unexpected and adverse changes in the foreign countries in which we operate could result in project disruptions, increased cost and potential losses.
•Our backlog is subject to unexpected adjustments and cancellations.
•Our employees work on projects that are inherently dangerous and in locations where there are high security risks, and a failure to maintain a safe work site could result in significant losses.
•Our businesses could be materially and adversely affected by events outside of our control.
•Our actual results could differ from the estimates used to prepare our financial statements.
•Our earnings are subject to volatility due to recurring fair value measurements of our investment in NuScale.
•If we experience delays or defaults in client payments, we could be negatively impacted.
•Our U.S. government contracts and contracting rights may be terminated or otherwise adversely impacted at any time, and our inability to win or renew government contracts during regulated procurement processes could harm our operations and reduce our projects and revenues.
•Our effective tax rate and tax positions may vary.
•It can be very difficult and expensive to obtain the insurance we need for our business operations.
•If we do not have adequate indemnification for our nuclear services, it could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
•Foreign currency risks could have an adverse impact on us.
•The loss of one or a few clients could have an adverse effect on us.
•Our business may be negatively impacted if we are unable to adequately protect IP rights.
•Climate change, natural disasters and related environmental issues could have a material adverse impact on us.
•Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from stakeholders with respect to sustainability practices may impose additional costs on us or expose us to reputational or other risks.
•We may be unsuccessful in implementing our strategic initiatives.
Risks Related to Indebtedness and Other Credit Related Risks
•Adverse credit and financial market conditions, including increasing or continued high interest rates, could impair our clients', our partners' and our own borrowing capacity, which could negatively affect us.
•The agreements governing our debt contain a number of restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our interest or that create shareholder value.
•Our indebtedness could lead to adverse consequences or adversely affect our financial position and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under such indebtedness, and any refinancing of this debt could be at significantly higher interest rates.
•We may be unable to win new contract awards if we cannot provide clients with financial assurances.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
•We are involved in litigation and regulatory proceedings, potential liability claims and contract disputes that may have a material impact on us.
•Our failure to recover adequately on claims against project owners, subcontractors or suppliers for payment or performance could have a material effect on us.
•We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.
•We could be adversely impacted if we fail to comply with domestic and international import and export laws.
•Employee, agent or partner misconduct or our overall failure to comply with laws or regulations could impair our ability to compete for contracts.
•New or changing legal requirements could adversely affect us.
•Past and future environmental, safety and health regulations could impose significant additional costs on us.
Risks Related to our Equity and Corporate Governance Documents
•If we issue additional equity securities, stockholders' ownership percentages would be diluted.
•Delaware law and our charter documents may impede or discourage a takeover or change of control.
Risks Related to our Operations
We are vulnerable to the cyclical nature of the markets we serve.
The demand for our services is dependent upon our clients' capital investments. Our clients' interest in approving new projects, budgets for capital expenditures and need for our services have in the past been, and may in the future be, adversely affected by, among other things, poor economic conditions (including inflation, slow growth or recession, changes to governments' fiscal or monetary policy and increasing or continued high interest rates), low or volatile oil and gas prices, political uncertainties and currency fluctuations. Clients have been and remain selective in how they allocate their capital, especially the larger scale projects in which we specialize. For example, capital expenditures by our clients are influenced by factors such as prevailing hydrocarbon prices and expectations about future prices for underlying commodities, technological advances, the costs of exploration, production and delivery of product, domestic and international political, military, regulatory and economic conditions and other similar factors. There is no guarantee that current oil and gas prices will be sufficient to justify clients' capital expenditures, and the timing and extent of any future improvements in demand remain uncertain. Industries served by that segment and many of the others we serve have historically been and will continue to be vulnerable to general downturns, which in turn could materially and adversely affect the demand for our services.
Our revenue and earnings are largely dependent on new awards.
The awarding and timing of projects is unpredictable and driven by our clients. Awards, including expansions of existing projects, often involve complex and lengthy negotiations and competitive bidding processes. These processes can be impacted by a wide variety of factors including a client's decision to not proceed with the development of a project, governmental approvals, financing contingencies (including governmental support), oil and gas prices, environmental conditions and overall market and economic conditions. We may not win contracts that we have bid on due to price, a client's perception of our ability to perform and/or perceived technology advantages held by others. Many of our competitors may be more inclined to take greater risks or include terms and conditions that we might not deem acceptable, especially when the markets for the services we typically offer are relatively soft. Because a significant portion of our revenue is generated from large projects, our results can fluctuate depending on whether and when large project awards occur and the commencement and progress of work under large contracts already awarded. As a result, we are subject to the risk of losing new awards to competitors or the risk that revenue may not be derived from awarded projects as quickly as anticipated. Additionally, uncertain economic and political conditions may make it difficult for our clients, our vendors and us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities. For example, changes to U.S. policies related to global trade and tariffs, and responsive changes in policy by foreign jurisdictions, have resulted in the past and may result in future uncertainty surrounding the global economy as well as retaliatory trade measures implemented by other countries. The new U.S. presidential administration has mentioned plans to implement tariffs on U.S. imports generally, with higher rates for select U.S. trade partners (collectively, the "Proposed Tariffs"). We cannot predict the outcome of changing trade policies or other unanticipated economic or political conditions, nor can we predict the timing, strength or duration of any worldwide economic recovery or downturn.
Following contract award, we may also encounter significant expense, delay, contract modification or even contract loss. Additionally, certain awards have been and may in the future be contested and/or otherwise involved in legal proceedings, inquiries or other similar developments outside of our control, which may result in significant delays in the project timeline or the wholesale cancellation or termination of a project. Any project delays, cancellations or contract modifications following the award of a contract could have an adverse effect on us.
The nature of our contracts, particularly our lump-sum contracts, subject us to risks associated with delays and cost overruns, which may not be fully recoverable and may result in reduced profits or losses that could have a material impact on us.
Because our projects are often technically complex, with multiple phases occurring over several years, we incur risks in our project execution activities. These risks could result in project delays, cost overruns or other problems and can include the following:
•Evolving estimates related to productivity, scheduling estimates or future economic conditions, including with respect to the impacts of inflation on lump-sum contracts;
•Unanticipated technical problems, including design or engineering issues;
•Inaccurate representations of site conditions and unanticipated changes in the project execution plan;
•Project modifications creating unanticipated costs or delays and failure to properly manage project modifications;
•Inability to achieve guaranteed performance or quality standards with regard to engineering, construction or project management obligations;
•Insufficient or inadequate project execution tools and systems needed to record, track, forecast and control cost and schedule;
•Reliance on historical cost and/or execution data that is not representative of current economic and/or execution conditions;
•Failure to accurately estimate the timing and cost of projects, including due to inflation, supply chain disruption, rising construction costs or unforeseen increases in the cost of labor;
•Unanticipated increases in the cost of raw materials, components or equipment, including due to inflation or the imposition of import tariffs, including the Proposed Tariffs;
•Failure to properly make judgments in accordance with applicable professional standards, including engineering standards;
•Failure to properly assess and update appropriate risk mitigation strategies and measures;
•Poor performance of our clients, partners, subcontractors, suppliers or other third parties;
•Delays or productivity issues caused by weather; and
•Changes in local laws or difficulties or delays in obtaining permits, rights of way or approvals.
These and other risks have in the past, and may in the future, result in our failure to achieve contractual cost or schedule commitments, safety performance, overall client satisfaction or other performance criteria. As a result, we may receive lower fees or lose our ability to earn incentive fees. In other cases, our fee will not change but we will have to continue to perform work without additional revenue until the performance criteria is achieved. We may also incur liquidated damages if we fail to complete a project on its contractual timeline. In addition, if we fail to meet guaranteed performance or quality standards, we may be held responsible under the guarantee or warranty provisions of our contract for cost impact to the client, generally in the form of contractually agreed-upon liquidated damages or an obligation to re-perform work. To the extent these events occur, the total cost to the project (including any liquidated damages) could be material and could, in some circumstances, equal or exceed the full value of the contract. In such events, our financial condition or results of operations could be materially and negatively impacted.
In circumstances where the contract is lump-sum or the revenue is otherwise fixed, we bear significant risk for delays and cost overruns. Reimbursable contract types, such as those that include negotiated hourly billing rates, may restrict the kinds or amounts of costs that are reimbursable, therefore exposing us to the risk that we may incur certain costs in executing these contracts that are above our estimates and not recoverable from our clients.
Intense competition in the EPC industry can impact our revenue and profits.
We serve markets that are highly competitive and in which a large number of multinational companies compete. These markets require substantial resources, investment in technology and skilled personnel. We have seen a continuing influx of non-traditional competitors offering below-market pricing while accepting greater risk. Competition places downward pressure on our contract prices and profit margins, and could cause us to accept contractual terms and conditions that are not normal or customary, thereby increasing the risk of reduced profitability on such contracts. Intense competition is expected to continue in our markets, presenting us with challenges to maintain acceptable profit margins. To the extent we are unable to meet these competitive challenges, we could experience reduced profitability.
Our ability to operate profitably requires us to hire and retain qualified personnel.
The success of our business is dependent upon being able to attract, develop and retain personnel, including engineers, project management, craft employees and management, who have the necessary and required experience and expertise, and who will perform these services at a reasonable and competitive rate. Competition for experienced personnel can be intense. It may be difficult to attract and retain qualified individuals with the expertise and in the timeframe demanded by our clients. In certain geographic areas, for example, we may be unable to satisfy the demand for our services because of our inability to deploy qualified personnel. Also, it may be difficult to replace personnel who hold government required credentials. Loss of the services of, or failure to recruit, qualified technical and management personnel, including a preference by some candidates to work remotely, could limit our ability to successfully complete existing projects and compete for new projects. In addition, as costs related to our workforce are dependent on market conditions, inflationary pressure has increased, and may continue to increase, labor costs in certain geographic areas.
As some of our executives and other key personnel approach retirement age or otherwise leave the company, we need to provide for smooth transitions, which requires succession planning to identify and integrate new personnel into leadership roles. Changes in our management team may disrupt our business and the failure to successfully transition and assimilate executives or other key personnel could adversely affect our results. If we are unable to employ a sufficient number of skilled personnel or effectively implement appropriate succession plans, our ability to pursue projects may be adversely affected and the costs of executing our existing and future projects may increase.
In addition, the cost of providing our services, including the extent to which we utilize our workforce, affects our profitability. For example, the uncertainty of contract award timing and unexpected award cancellations can present difficulties in matching our workforce size with project needs. If an expected contract award is delayed or not received, we could incur costs resulting from excess staff, reductions in staff, or redundancy of facilities that could have a material adverse impact on us. Increased labor costs can also impact our customers' decision making with respect to the viability or timing of certain projects, which could result in project delays or cancellations and in turn have a material adverse impact on us.
The success of teaming arrangements and joint ventures depends on the satisfactory performance by our venture partners over whom we may have little or no control, and the failure of those partners to perform their obligations could impose additional obligations on us that could have a material impact on us.
In the ordinary course of business in our industry, we execute projects and otherwise conduct certain operations through joint ventures, partnerships and other collaborative arrangements (collectively, "ventures"). We have various ownership interests in these ventures, with such ownership typically being proportionate to our decision-making and distribution rights. The ventures generally contract directly with our client; however, services may be performed directly by the venture, or may be performed by us, our partners, or a combination thereof.
Our success in many markets is impacted by the presence or capability of our partners. If we are unable to compete alone, or with a quality partner, our ability to win work and successfully execute our projects may be impacted. Differences in opinions or views between venture partners can result in delayed decision-making or failure to agree on material issues, which could adversely affect the business and operations of our ventures. In many of the countries in which we engage in joint ventures, it may be difficult to enforce our contractual rights under the applicable joint venture agreement.
At times, we also participate in ventures with other parties. In such instances, we may have limited control over venture decisions and actions, including ICFR, which may have an impact on our business. If internal control problems arise within a venture, or if our venture partners have financial or operational issues, there could be a material impact on us.
The success of our ventures also depends, in large part, on the satisfactory performance by our venture partners of their obligations, including their obligation to commit working capital, equity or credit support as required by the venture and to support their indemnification and other contractual obligations. If our venture partners fail to satisfactorily perform their obligations, the venture may be unable to adequately perform or deliver its contracted services. Under these circumstances, we may be required to make additional investments and provide additional services to ensure the adequate performance and delivery of the contracted services and to meet any performance guarantees. From time to time, in order to establish or preserve a client relationship, or to better ensure venture success, we may accept risks or responsibilities for the venture that are not necessarily proportionate with the reward we expect to receive or that may differ from risks or responsibilities we would normally accept in our own operations. We may also be subject to joint and several liability under the contracts for venture projects. These additional obligations could result in reduced profits or, in some cases, increased liabilities or significant losses for us with respect to the venture, and in turn, our business and operations. In addition, a failure by a venture partner to comply with applicable regulations could negatively impact our business and reputation and could result in fines, penalties, suspension or, in the case of government contracts, even debarment.
We are dependent upon suppliers and subcontractors to complete many of our contracts.
Some of the work performed under our contracts is performed by third-party subcontractors. We also rely on third-party suppliers to provide much of the equipment and materials used for projects. If we are unable to hire qualified subcontractors or find qualified suppliers, our ability to successfully or timely complete a project could be impacted. If the amount we are required to pay for subcontractors or equipment and supplies exceeds what we have estimated, especially in lump-sum contracts, we may suffer losses on them. If a supplier or subcontractor fails to provide supplies, technology, equipment or services as required under a contract to us, our joint venture partner, our client or any other party involved in the project for any reason, or provides supplies, technology, equipment or services that are not an acceptable quality, we may be required to source those supplies, technology, equipment or services on a delayed basis or at a higher price than anticipated, which could impact our profitability. In addition, faulty workmanship, equipment or materials could impact the overall project, resulting in claims against us for failure to meet required project specifications. These risks may be intensified during an economic downturn if these suppliers or subcontractors experience financial difficulties or find it difficult to obtain sufficient financing to fund their operations or access to bonding, and are not able to provide the services or supplies necessary for our business. A failure by a third-party subcontractor or supplier to comply with applicable laws, rules or regulations could negatively impact our business and reputation and could result in fines, penalties, suspension, or in the case of government contracts, even debarment.
Cybersecurity breaches of our systems and IT could adversely impact us.
Our business depends on the secure processing, storage, and transmission of confidential and sensitive information, including personal data of our employees, subcontractors, suppliers, business partners and clients. The various administrative and technical controls we have implemented to protect our systems and data from unauthorized access, cyber-attacks, and other cybersecurity breaches and our endeavors to require our third-party providers to adhere to industry recognized security standards may be insufficient to prevent all cybersecurity breaches or cyber-attacks. The risk of a cybersecurity breach or cyber-attack applies to any company with whom we do business and could adversely affect us, particularly when working collaboratively in shared workspaces or computing environments. Our efforts to protect information on our network and put technical and/or contractual measures in place to protect information exchanges with other third parties with whom we work may be unsuccessful, and we cannot control or manage the safety and security of any third-party computing environment. In addition, because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to IT networks and systems change frequently, we and others with whom we work may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. As cybersecurity threats become more sophisticated and difficult to detect, our ability to promptly prevent, detect and mitigate the effects of cyber-attacks and other cybersecurity breaches may be impacted, potentially resulting in material adverse effects.
In the event of a cybersecurity breach or cyber-attack, we may experience operational disruptions, financial losses, legal claims, and reputational damage. We may also incur significant costs to remediate the effects of such incidents, including costs associated with investigating the incident, repairing or replacing damaged systems and compensating affected parties.
We may also be subject to legal and regulatory actions, investigations, and penalties related to cybersecurity breaches and the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information or personal data, which may result in significant fines, sanctions, and legal fees, as well as damage to our reputation and customer relationships. In addition, data protection and cybersecurity laws are continuously evolving at a rapid pace and on a global level, which add heightened risk and additional costs in assessing, implementing and managing compliance measures that affect business operations. Any failure to comply with these laws and regulations or an exposure of information covered by such laws and regulations, including, without limitation, in connection with a cybersecurity breach, could have a negative impact on us.
The insurance we maintain that specifically covers cybersecurity threats may not sufficiently cover all types of losses or claims that we might experience, including losses from reputational harm or the costs to improve security against future similar threats or losses arising from the computing environments and systems managed by others.
Systems and IT interruption, as well as new systems implementation, could adversely impact our ability to operate.
We are heavily reliant on computer, information and communications technology and related systems, some of which are hosted by third-party providers. From time to time, we experience system interruptions and delays that may be planned for upgrades or that may be unplanned. Unplanned interruptions could result from natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failures, acts of war or terrorism, errors or other defects in the design or implementation of the applicable system, computer viruses, malicious code, physical or electronic security breaches, intentional or inadvertent user misuse or error and similar events or disruptions. Any of these or other events could cause system interruptions, delays, loss of critical or sensitive data (including personal or financial data) or loss of funds; could delay or prevent operations (including
the processing of transactions and reporting of financial results); and could adversely affect us. Safeguards designed to protect against unavailability or loss of data may not be sufficient. We may be required to incur significant costs to protect against or alleviate damage caused by systems interruptions and delays, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We continue to evaluate the need to upgrade and/or replace our systems and network infrastructure to protect our computing environment, to stay current on vendor supported products, to improve the efficiency of our systems and for other business reasons. The implementation of new technology systems and tools could adversely impact our operations by imposing substantial capital expenditures, demands on management time, risks of delays, complications in setup or configuration or other difficulties in transitioning to new systems. Our systems implementations also may not result in productivity improvements at the levels anticipated. Disruptions, if not anticipated and appropriately mitigated, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We may use artificial intelligence, machine learning, data science and similar technologies in our business, and challenges with properly managing such technologies could result in reputational harm, competitive harm, and legal liability, and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Artificial intelligence, machine learning, data science and similar technologies (collectively, “AI”), including third-party AI tools, may be enabled by, or integrated into, some of our business processes and solutions. As with many developing technologies, AI presents risks and challenges that could affect its further development, adoption, and use, and therefore our business. AI algorithms may be flawed or biased. Datasets used to train or develop AI systems may be insufficient, of inferior quality, or contain biased information. Our AI governance review process and self-imposed requirement to implement safeguards before adopting AI may not be adequate to protect against these risks and challenges. Additionally, the laws and regulations concerning the use of AI continue to evolve. If the use or integration of AI systems, or the outputs generated by such systems, were determined to be non-compliant (e.g., in relation to IP or data privacy rights or in relation to the deployment of AI for certain activities or use cases), this may adversely affect us. It is possible that emerging regulations may limit or block the use of AI in our business or otherwise impose restrictions that may adversely affect the efficiency of our business processes or solutions that were utilizing AI technologies.
The safeguards we have implemented, including policies and procedures, governance reviews, technical measures where feasible, and contractual obligations relating to the ethical use of AI, may not be adequate or effective, and we cannot guarantee or control how third parties with whom we do business may utilize AI, which may increase our risk and exposure relating to confidentiality and information security and information accuracy. If a breach of confidentiality or error or defect were to occur as a result of using AI, directly or indirectly, it could adversely affect our business, reputation, financial condition and results of operations.
Our competitors may incorporate AI into their product and service offerings more quickly or more successfully than us, which could impair our ability to compete effectively and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We have international operations that are subject to foreign economic and political uncertainties and risks. Unexpected and adverse changes in the foreign countries in which we operate could result in project disruptions, increased cost and potential losses.
Our business is subject to international economic and political conditions that change (sometimes frequently) for reasons that are beyond our control. We expect that a significant portion of our revenue and profits will continue to come from non-U.S. projects for the foreseeable future.
Operating in the international marketplace exposes us to a number of risks including:
•abrupt changes in government policies, laws, treaties (including those impacting trade), regulations or leadership;
•embargoes or other trade restrictions, including sanctions;
•restrictions on currency movement;
•tax or tariff changes (including the Proposed Tariffs) and withholding requirements;
•currency exchange rate fluctuations;
•changes in labor conditions and difficulties in staffing and managing international operations, including logistical and communication challenges;
•U.S. government trade or other policy changes in relation to the foreign countries in which we operate;
•other regional, social, political and economic instability, including recessions and other economic crises;
•natural disasters and public health crises, including pandemics;
•expropriation and nationalization of our assets or projects;
•international hostilities, such as the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict and political and economic instability and conflict in the Middle East; and
•other unrest, civil strife, acts of war, terrorism and insurrection.
The lack of a well-developed legal system in some of the countries where we operate may make it difficult to enforce our contractual rights or to defend ourselves against claims made by others. We operate in locations where there is a significant amount of political risk. In addition, nationalization, military action or continued unrest could impact the supply or pricing of oil, disrupt our operations in the region and elsewhere, and increase our security costs. Any alleged or actual failure to comply with any sanctions or trade control measures implemented in response to international conflicts may subject us to government scrutiny, civil and/or criminal proceedings, sanctions and other liabilities. Our level of exposure to these risks may vary with each project, depending on the location of the project and its stage of completion. For example, our risk exposure with respect to a project in an early development phase, such as engineering, will generally be less than our risk exposure on a project that is in the construction phase. To the extent that our international business is affected by unexpected and adverse foreign economic and political conditions and risks, we may experience project disruptions and losses.
Our backlog is subject to unexpected adjustments and cancellations.
Our backlog generally consists of projects for which we have an executed contract or commitment with a client and reflects our expected revenue from the contract or commitment, which is often subject to revision over time. There is no guarantee that the revenue projected in our backlog will be realized or profitable or will not be subject to delay or suspension. Project cancellations, scope adjustments or deferrals, or foreign currency fluctuations may occur with respect to contracts reflected in our backlog and could reduce the value of our backlog and the revenue and profits that we actually earn; or, may cause the rate at which we perform on our backlog to decrease. Most of our contracts have termination for convenience provisions in them allowing clients to cancel projects. Our contracts typically provide for the payment of fees earned through the date of termination and the reimbursement of costs incurred including demobilization costs. In addition, projects may remain in our backlog for an extended period of time. During periods of economic slowdown, or decreases and/or instability in oil and gas prices, the risk of projects being suspended, delayed or canceled generally increases. Finally, poor project execution could also impact our backlog and profits. Such developments could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our employees work on projects that are inherently dangerous and in locations where there are high security risks, and a failure to maintain a safe work site could result in significant losses.
We often work on complex projects, frequently in geographically remote or high-risk locations that are subject to political, social or economic risks, or war or civil unrest. In those locations where we have employees or operations, we may expend significant efforts and incur substantial security costs to maintain safety. In addition, our project sites can place our employees and others near large equipment, dangerous processes or substances or highly regulated materials, and in challenging environments. Safety is a primary focus of our business and is critical to our reputation and performance. Many of our clients require that we meet certain safety criteria to be eligible to bid on contracts, and some of our contract fees or profits are subject to satisfying safety criteria. Unsafe work conditions also have the potential of increasing employee turnover, increasing project costs and raising our operating costs. If we fail to implement appropriate safety procedures or if our procedures fail, our employees or others may suffer injuries or loss of life, the completion of a project could be delayed and we could experience investigations or litigation. The safety function we rely on to implement effective health, safety and environmental procedures throughout our company may be ineffective, and the failure to comply with such procedures, client contracts or applicable regulations could subject us to losses and liability. Despite these activities we cannot guarantee the safety of our personnel, nor can we guarantee our work, equipment or supplies will be free from damage.
Our businesses could be materially and adversely affected by events outside of our control.
Extraordinary or force majeure events beyond our control, such as natural or man-made disasters, severe weather conditions, public health crises, supply chain disruption, geopolitical conflicts, political crises or other catastrophic events, could negatively impact our ability to operate or increase our costs to operate. Such events may result in disruptions to our operations; evacuation of personnel; increased labor and material costs or shortages; inability to deliver materials, equipment and personnel to job sites in accordance with contract schedules; and loss of productivity. When making contract proposals,
we rely heavily on our estimates of costs and timing to complete the associated projects, as well as assumptions regarding technical issues, but those estimates and assumptions may ultimately prove to be incorrect. Additionally, we may remain obligated to perform our services after any natural or human-caused events, unless certain contractual provisions allow for relief from such obligations. The extra costs incurred as a result of these events may not be reimbursed by our clients. If we are not able to react quickly to such events, or if a high concentration of our projects is impacted by such an event, our operations may be adversely affected. In addition, if we cannot complete our contracts on time, we may be subject to potential liability claims by our clients, which may reduce our profits and result in losses.
Our actual results could differ from the estimates used to prepare our financial statements.
In preparing our financial statements, we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported values of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Areas requiring development of significant estimates include:
•determination of profitability;
•recognition of project incentives, awards, change orders, claims or other variable consideration we expect to receive;
•estimated amounts for project losses, warranty costs, contract close-out or other costs;
•income tax provisions and related valuation allowances; and
•accruals for other estimated liabilities, including litigation and insurance reserves and receivables.
Estimates are based on reasonable assumptions and experience, but are only estimates. Our actual business and financial results can differ from our estimates of such results due to changes in facts and circumstances, which can have a material negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Further, we recognize contract revenue as work on a contract progresses. The cumulative amount of revenue recorded on a contract at any point is that percentage of total estimated revenue that costs incurred to date bear to estimated total costs. Accordingly, contract revenue and total cost estimates are reviewed and revised as the work progresses. Adjustments are reflected in contract revenue in the period when such estimates are revised. Such adjustments are at times material and result in reduced profitability.
Our earnings are subject to volatility due to recurring fair value measurements of our investment in NuScale.
Since October 2024, we account for our investment in NuScale using the fair value option for equity method investments, under which we measure our investment at fair value on a recurring basis using the prevailing price of NuScale's stock on our balance sheet dates. The fair value of our investment in NuScale is subject to the fluctuations of NuScale's stock price, which may subject our consolidated earnings to volatility. The price of NuScale's stock has experienced significant volatility since it commenced trading in May 2022, and the volatility may continue in the future in response to many factors, including factors beyond the control of us or NuScale. As a result of the recurring fair value measurements, we may recognize non-cash gains or losses in future periods, some of which could be material.
If we experience delays or defaults in client payments, we could be negatively impacted.
Because of the nature of our contracts, we sometimes commit resources to projects prior to receiving payments from clients in amounts sufficient to cover expenditures as they come due. Some of our clients have found it difficult to pay our invoices timely, increasing the risk that our accounts receivable could become uncollectible and ultimately be written off. In certain cases, our clients for our large projects are project-specific entities that do not have significant assets other than their interests in the project. From time to time, it is difficult for us to collect payments owed to us by these clients. In addition, clients may request extension of the payment terms otherwise agreed to under our contracts. Delays in client payments may require us to make a working capital investment, which could impact our cash flows and liquidity. If a client fails to pay invoices on a timely basis or defaults, there could be a material adverse effect on our results of operations or liquidity.
Our U.S. government contracts and contracting rights may be terminated or otherwise adversely impacted at any time, and our inability to win or renew government contracts during regulated procurement processes could harm our operations and reduce our projects and revenues.
We have a significant portfolio of government contracts, including those that we have in place with the DOE and U.S. Department of Defense. U.S. government contracts are subject to various uncertainties, restrictions and regulations, including oversight audits by government agencies and profit and cost controls, which could result in withholding or delay of payments to us. U.S. government contracts are also subject to uncertainties associated with congressional funding, including the potential impacts of budget deficits, government shutdowns and federal sequestration. A significant reduction in federal
government spending or a change in budgetary priorities could reduce demand for our services, cancel or delay federal projects, and result in the closure of federal facilities and significant personnel reductions. Changes in U.S. government priorities by the new U.S. presidential administration or congressional leadership, or other policy changes or economic changes, could adversely impact us. The U.S. government is under no obligation to maintain program funding at any specific level, and funds for a program may even be eliminated. Our U.S. government clients may terminate or decide not to renew our contracts with little or no prior notice.
In addition, U.S. government contracts are subject to specific regulations such as the Federal Acquisition Regulation ("FAR"), the Truth in Negotiations Act, the Cost Accounting Standards ("CAS"), the Service Contract Act and Department of Defense security regulations. Failure to comply with any of these regulations and other government requirements may result in contract price adjustments, financial penalties or contract termination. Our U.S. government contracts are also subject to audits, cost reviews and investigations by U.S. government oversight agencies such as the U.S. Defense Contract Audit Agency (the "DCAA"). The DCAA reviews the adequacy of, and our compliance with, our internal controls and policies (including our labor, billing, accounting, purchasing, estimating, compensation and management information systems). The DCAA also has the ability to review how we have accounted for costs under the FAR and CAS. The DCAA presents its findings to the Defense Contract Management Agency ("DCMA"). Should the DCMA determine that we have not complied with the terms of our contract and applicable statutes and regulations, or if they believe that we have engaged in inappropriate accounting or other activities, payments to us may be disallowed or we could be required to refund previously collected payments. Additionally, we may be subject to criminal and civil penalties, suspension or debarment from future government contracts, and qui tam litigation brought by private individuals on behalf of the U.S. government under the False Claims Act, which could include claims for treble damages. These suits may remain under seal (and hence, be unknown to us) for some time while the government decides whether to intervene on behalf of the qui tam plaintiff. Furthermore, if we have significant disagreements with our government clients concerning costs incurred, negative publicity could arise, which could adversely affect our industry reputation and our ability to compete for new contracts in the government arena or otherwise.
Most U.S. government contracts are awarded through a rigorous competitive process. The U.S. government has increasingly relied upon multiple-year contracts with pre-established terms and conditions that generally require those contractors that have been previously awarded the contract to engage in an additional competitive bidding process for each task order issued under the contract. Such processes require successful contractors to anticipate requirements and develop rapid-response bid and proposal teams as well as dedicated supplier relationships and delivery systems to react to these needs. We face rigorous competition and significant pricing pressures in order to win these task orders. If we are not successful in containing costs or able to timely respond to government requests, we may not win additional awards. Moreover, even if we are qualified to work on a government contract, we may be impacted in our pursuit of work by government policies designed to protect small businesses or certain other types of contractors.
Many of our U.S. government contracts require security clearances. Depending upon the level of clearance required, security clearances can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain. If we or our employees are unable to obtain or retain necessary security clearances, we may not be able to win new business, and our existing government clients could terminate their contracts with us or decide not to renew them.
Our effective tax rate and tax positions may vary.
We are subject to income taxes where we do business. A change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or their interpretation, in any country in which we operate could change our overall tax rate, which could have a material impact on our results of operations. In particular, international operations could adversely be affected by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 's proposed international taxation reform and introduction of a global minimum tax. In addition, significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes and our judgments could prove inaccurate. There are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are regularly under audit by tax authorities, and our tax estimates and tax positions could be materially affected by many factors including the final outcome of tax audits and related litigation, the introduction of new tax accounting standards, legislation, regulations and related interpretations, our global mix of earnings, our ability to realize deferred tax assets and changes in uncertain tax positions. Future changes in our tax rate or adverse changes in tax laws could have a material adverse effect on us. We may also be exposed to limitations on our ability to reinvest earnings from operations in one country to fund our operations in other countries due to tax laws in different jurisdictions.
It can be very difficult and expensive to obtain the insurance we need for our business operations.
We maintain insurance both as a corporate risk management strategy and to satisfy the requirements of many of our contracts. Although we have been generally able to cover our insurance needs, there can be no assurances that we can secure all necessary or appropriate insurance in the future, or that such insurance can be economically secured. For example, catastrophic events can result in decreased coverage limits, more limited coverage, increased premium costs or deductibles. We also monitor the financial health of our insurance providers. Our insurance is purchased from a number of leading
providers, often in layered insurance or quota share arrangements. If any of our third-party insurers fail, abruptly cancel our coverage or otherwise cannot satisfy their obligations to us, then our overall risk exposure and operational expenses could increase and our business operations could be interrupted.
If we do not have adequate indemnification for our nuclear services, it could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
We provide services to the DOE and the nuclear energy industry in the on-going maintenance and modification of nuclear facilities as well as decontamination and decommissioning activities of nuclear plants. The Price-Anderson Act generally indemnifies parties performing services to nuclear power plants and DOE contractors; however, not all of our activities are covered. Thus, if the Price-Anderson Act indemnification protections do not apply to our services, or if the exposure occurs outside of the U.S. in a region that does not have protections comparable to the Price-Anderson Act, we could be adversely affected by our client's refusal to contract with us, by our inability to obtain commercially reasonable insurance or third-party indemnification, or by the potentially significant monetary damages we could incur.
Foreign currency risks could have an adverse impact on us.
Our contracts may subject us to foreign currency risk, particularly when project revenue is denominated in a currency different from its expected costs. Contracts may be denominated in different currencies at various points in time as a project progresses. We may attempt to minimize our exposure to foreign currency risk by obtaining contract provisions that protect us from foreign currency fluctuations and/or by implementing hedging strategies utilizing derivatives. However, these actions may not always eliminate all foreign currency risk, and as a result, our profitability or cash flows could be affected.
Our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in nonfunctional currencies are subject to remeasurement which introduces potential profit volatility. In addition, the U.S. dollar value of our backlog may from time to time increase or decrease significantly due to foreign currency volatility.
The loss of one or a few clients could have an adverse effect on us.
A few clients, including the U.S. government, state governments and governmental agencies comprise a significant portion of our revenue. Although we have long-standing relationships with our most significant clients, our clients may unilaterally reduce, fail to renew or terminate their contracts with us at any time. The loss of business from a significant client could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our business may be negatively impacted if we are unable to adequately protect IP rights.
Our success is impacted by our ability to differentiate our services through our technologies and know-how. This includes the ability to protect IP rights. We utilize a combination of patents, copyrights, trade secrets, confidentiality agreements and other contractual arrangements to protect our interests. However, these methods only provide limited protection and may not adequately protect our interests. Our employees, contractors and joint venture partners are subject to confidentiality obligations, but this protection may be inadequate to deter or prevent misappropriation of our confidential information and/or infringement of our IP rights. This can be especially true in certain foreign countries where IP does not have equivalent protections as in the U.S., or when our joint venture partner is a competitor who will gain access to our procedures and know-how while working with us in the performance of services.
Our clients require broad ownership rights in the work product and other materials we deliver. If we are unable to retain ownership of our IP and improvements thereto, it may affect our ability to provide similar services and other projects in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our competitors or others may independently develop technology substantially similar to our trade secret technology or we may be unsuccessful in preserving our IP rights in the future. Our IP rights could be invalidated, circumvented, challenged or infringed upon. Litigation to determine the scope of IP rights, even if ultimately successful, could be costly and could divert management's attention.
In addition, our clients or other third parties may also provide us with their technology and IP. There is a risk that we may not sufficiently protect against improper use, access or dissemination and, as a result, we could be subject to claims and litigation and resulting liabilities, loss of contracts or other consequences that could have an adverse impact on us.
We also hold licenses from third parties utilized in our business operations. If we are no longer able to license such technology on commercially reasonable terms or otherwise, we could be adversely affected. When we license our IP to third parties, the scope of such license grant is generally limited. If such third party exceeds the scope of the license grant, and if we are unable to detect unauthorized use of our IP or otherwise take appropriate steps to enforce our rights, our revenue and margins will be adversely impacted, and the value of our IP portfolio may be adversely affected.
Climate change, natural disasters and related environmental issues could have a material adverse impact on us.
Climate-related events, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods, wildfires, droughts, hurricanes, freezing conditions, and other natural disasters, may have short-term, intermediate and long-term impacts on our business, financial condition and results of operation. Our efforts to mitigate our business risks associated with climate change cannot eliminate those risks, and we recognize that there are inherent climate related risks regardless of where we conduct our businesses. For example, a catastrophic natural disaster could negatively impact any of our office locations and our project locations. Access to clean water and reliable energy in the communities where we conduct our business is critical to our operations. Accordingly, a natural disaster has the potential to disrupt our and our clients’ businesses and may cause us to experience work stoppages, supply chain disruptions, project delays, financial losses and additional costs to resume operations, including increased insurance costs or loss of cover, legal liability and reputational losses.
Further, the risks caused by climate change span across the full spectrum of the markets we serve. The direct physical risks that climate change poses through chronic environmental changes, such as rising sea levels and temperatures, and acute events, such as hurricanes, droughts and wildfires, are common to each of these industries. Our clients could face increased costs to maintain their assets, which could result in reduced profitability and fewer resources for strategic investment. These types of physical risks could in turn lead to transitional risks (i.e., the degree to which society responds to the threat of climate change). For example, concerns about climate change may result in activism, protests, legislation, international protocols or treaties, regulation or other restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions or that otherwise seek to address climate change that could affect our clients, including those who (a) are involved in the exploration, production or refining of hydrocarbons, such as our Energy Solutions clients, (b) emit greenhouse gases through the combustion of hydrocarbons or (c) emit greenhouse gases through the mining, manufacture, utilization or production of materials or goods. Such actions could increase the costs of projects for us and our clients or, in some cases, prevent a project from going forward, thereby potentially reducing the need for our services, which would in turn have a material adverse impact on us. However, policy changes and climate legislation could also accelerate energy transition, including the development of carbon capture and storage projects, alternative transportation, alternative energy facilities, such as wind farms or nuclear reactors, or incentivize increased implementation of clean fuels projects, which could positively impact the demand for our services. We cannot predict when or whether any of these legislative proposals may become law or what effect they will have on us and our clients.
We will also continue to incur additional expenses implementing U.S. and international regulations requiring additional disclosures regarding GHG emissions and/or broader sustainability-related factors. Compliance with such regulations and the associated potential costs is complicated by various countries and regions following different approaches to the regulation of climate change.
Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from stakeholders with respect to sustainability practices may impose additional costs on us or expose us to reputational or other risks.
Investors, clients, governments and other stakeholders have continued to focus on the sustainability practices of companies, including practices with respect to human capital, emissions and environmental impact and political spending. Expectations and requirements evolve rapidly, vary in their support for or rejection of such matters, and are largely out of our control, and our sustainability initiatives and disclosures in response to such expectations and requirements may result in increased costs (including but not limited to increased costs related to compliance, stakeholder engagement, contracting, litigation and insurance), change in demand for certain services, change in our competitiveness, enhanced or modified compliance or disclosure obligations, or other adverse impacts to our business or results of operations, including reputational harm. While we have programs and initiatives in place related to our sustainability practices, investors may decide to reallocate capital or to not commit capital as a result of their assessment of our practices. In addition, our clients may require that we adhere to varying sustainability standards. Our failure to comply with investor or client standards, which are evolving and may differ, or if we are perceived to not have responded appropriately to the growing concern for, or opposition to, these issues could also cause reputational harm to our business and could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, organizations that provide ratings information to investors on sustainability matters may have unfavorable views on us, which may lead to negative sentiment or divestment.
In addition, while we may create and publish voluntary disclosures regarding sustainability matters, many of the statements in those voluntary disclosures are based on expectations and assumptions that may not be representative of current or actual risks, including the costs associated therewith. Such expectations and assumptions are necessarily uncertain and may be prone to error or subject to misinterpretation given the long timelines involved and the lack of an established single approach to identifying, measuring and reporting on many sustainability matters. In addition, there are increasing and inconsistent levels of regulation, disclosure-related and otherwise, with respect to sustainability matters. For example, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive in the European Union as well as new sustainability-related disclosure requirements in U.S. states and other jurisdictions require companies to provide significantly expanded sustainability and other climate-related disclosures. Requirements from the SEC, European or other regulators may require us to incur
significant costs to comply and distract our management and Board of Directors. We may also face material risks from the potential reversal or modification of these regulations, and reversal or material modification of these regulations could could lead to the loss of time and resources already invested to prepare for these requirements. Many of these costs may not be recoverable from our clients.
We may be unsuccessful in implementing our strategic initiatives.
We have announced a number of strategic initiatives, including plans to reduce our ownership of NuScale and to finalize the divestitures of Stork. Our ability to successfully execute these initiatives is subject to various risks and uncertainties, including regulatory intervention, which may negatively impact the realization of expected benefits. Our failure to realize the anticipated benefits, which may be due to our inability to execute, competition, economic conditions, and other risks described herein, could have a material adverse effect on us. Divesting businesses involves risks and uncertainties, such as the difficulty separating assets related to such businesses from the businesses we retain, employee distraction, and the need to obtain regulatory approvals and other third-party consents, which potentially disrupts customer and vendor relationships. Such actions also involve significant costs and require time and attention from our management, which may divert attention from other business operations. Because of these challenges, as well as market conditions or other factors, anticipated divestitures may take longer or be costlier or generate fewer benefits than expected and may not be completed at all. If we are unable to complete the divestitures or to successfully transition divested businesses, our business and financial results could be negatively impacted. If we dispose of a business, we may not be able to successfully cause a buyer of a divested business to assume the liabilities of that business or, even if such liabilities are assumed, we may have difficulties enforcing our rights, contractual or otherwise, against the buyer. We may retain exposure on financial or performance guarantees and other contractual, employment, pension and severance obligations, and potential liabilities that may arise under law because of the disposition or the subsequent failure of an acquirer.
Risks Related to Indebtedness and Other Credit Related Risks
Adverse credit and financial market conditions, including increasing or continued high interest rates, could impair our clients', our partners' and our own borrowing capacity, which could negatively affect us.
Our ability to access cash is important for the funding of our operations, investing in ventures, the servicing of our indebtedness, paying dividends and making acquisitions. To the extent that existing cash balances and operating cash flow, together with borrowing capacity under our credit facility, are insufficient to make investments or acquisitions or provide needed working capital, we may require additional financing from other sources. Our ability to obtain such additional financing will depend upon prevailing capital market conditions, including those arising due to events occurring in our industry, as well as conditions in our business and our operating results; and those factors may affect our efforts to negotiate terms that are acceptable to us. Furthermore, if global economic, industry, political or other market conditions adversely affect the financial institutions that provide credit to us, our ability to establish or draw upon our credit facility, or refinance borrowings as they mature, may be impacted. In addition, a downgrade in our credit rating could increase the cost of our borrowings or their refinancing, limit access to sources of financing or lead to other adverse consequences such as requirements for liens or other forms of financial assurance. If adequate funds are not available, or are not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to make future investments, take advantage of acquisitions or other opportunities, or respond to competitive challenges.
In addition, adverse credit and financial market conditions, including increasing or continued high interest rates potentially as a result to the Proposed Tariffs, also adversely affect our clients' and our partners' borrowing capacity, which could result in contract cancellations or suspensions, project award and execution delays, payment delays or defaults by our clients. These disruptions could materially impact us.
The agreements governing our debt contain a number of restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our interest or that create shareholder value.
Our credit facility and the indentures governing our debt contain a number of significant covenants that impose operating and other restrictions on us and our subsidiaries. Such restrictions affect or will affect and, in many respects, limit or prohibit, among other things, our ability and the ability of some of our subsidiaries to:
•incur additional indebtedness;
•create liens;
•pay dividends and make other distributions in respect of our equity securities;
•make investments or other restricted payments;
•sell assets;
•enter into transactions with affiliates; and
•effect mergers or consolidations.
In addition, our credit facility requires us to maintain specified financial covenants. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default. If a default occurs, the relevant lenders could elect to accelerate payments due. If our operating performance declines, or if we are unable to comply with any covenant, we may need to obtain amendments to our credit agreements or waivers from the lenders to avoid default. These factors could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our indebtedness could lead to adverse consequences or adversely affect our financial position and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under such indebtedness, and any refinancing of this debt could be at significantly higher interest rates.
Our indebtedness could have important consequences, including but not limited to:
•increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
•requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our operating cash flow to servicing our debt, thereby reducing the availability of cash to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and investments and other general corporate purposes; and
•limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, challenges and opportunities, and changes in our businesses and the markets in which we operate.
Our ability to service our debt will depend on our future operating performance and financial results, which may be subject to factors beyond our control, including general economic, financial and business conditions. If we do not have sufficient cash flow to service our debt, we may need to refinance all or part of our existing debt, borrow more money or sell securities or assets, some or all of which may not be available to us at acceptable terms or at all. In addition, we may need to incur additional debt in the future in the ordinary course. Although the terms of our credit agreements and our indentures allow us to incur additional debt, there are limitations which may preclude us from incurring the desired amount.
We may be unable to win new contract awards if we cannot provide clients with financial assurances.
It is a common industry practice for clients to require us to provide surety bonds, letters of credit, bank guarantees or other forms of financial assurance as credit enhancements. Surety bonds, letters of credit or guarantees indemnify our clients if we fail to perform our contractual obligations. Historically, we have had strong surety bonding capacity due to our credit ratings, but bonding is provided at the surety's sole discretion. In addition, because of the overall limitations in worldwide bonding capacity, we may find it difficult to access sufficient surety bonding capacity to meet our total surety bonding needs. For letters of credit, we have historically had adequate capacity under our existing credit facility, but any capacity that may be required in excess of our credit limits would be at our lenders' sole discretion. Failure to provide credit enhancements on terms required by a client may result in an inability to compete for or win a project.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
We are involved in litigation and regulatory proceedings, potential liability claims and contract disputes that may have a material impact on us.
We are subject to a variety of legal or regulatory proceedings, liability claims or contract disputes. Our operating activities expose us to claims against us by clients, subcontractors or suppliers for recovery of costs they incurred in excess of what they expected to incur, or for which they believe they are not contractually liable. We may be named as a defendant in legal proceedings where parties may make a claim for damages or other remedies with respect to our projects or other matters, including shareholder litigation. During times of economic uncertainty, especially with regard to our commodity-based clients, claim frequencies and amounts tend to increase.
In proceedings where it is determined that we have liability, we may not be covered by insurance or these liabilities may exceed our coverage. In addition, even where insurance is maintained for such exposure, the policies have deductibles resulting in our assuming exposure for a layer of coverage with respect to any such claims. Our professional liability coverage is on a "claims-made" basis covering only claims actually made during the policy period. Any liability not covered by our insurance, in excess of our insurance limits or, if covered by insurance but subject to a high deductible, could have a material adverse impact on us.
In other legal or regulatory proceedings, liability claims or contract disputes, we may be covered by indemnification agreements that may at times be difficult to enforce. Even if enforceable, it may be difficult to recover under these agreements if the indemnitor does not have the ability to financially support the indemnity. Litigation and regulatory proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties, and unfavorable rulings could occur, including for monetary damages. If we were to receive an unfavorable ruling in a matter, our business and results of operations could be materially harmed. Such proceedings can also be costly, time-consuming, disruptive to operations and distracting to management, regardless of the outcome. Our estimates regarding loss contingencies related to pending proceedings may not be accurate, and we could be required to pay significantly more for certain proceedings than we currently anticipate.
Our failure to recover adequately on claims against clients, subcontractors or suppliers for payment or performance could have a material effect on us.
We occasionally bring claims against clients and partners for additional costs exceeding the contract price or for amounts not included in the original contract price. Similarly, we present change orders and claims to our subcontractors and suppliers. If we fail to properly provide notice or document the nature of change orders or claims, or are otherwise unsuccessful in negotiating a reasonable settlement, we could incur reduced profits, cost overruns and in some cases a loss on the project. These types of claims can occur due to matters such as owner-caused delays or changes from the initial project scope, which result in additional cost. These claims can result in lengthy and costly proceedings, and it is often difficult to accurately predict when these claims will be fully resolved. When these types of events occur and while unresolved claims are pending, we may invest significant working capital in projects to cover cost overruns pending the resolution of the relevant claims. A failure to promptly recover on these types of claims could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and financial results.
We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.
The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010 and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to officials or others for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We operate in many parts of the world that have experienced corruption to some degree and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices, and our policies mandating compliance with these anti-bribery laws may not be effective. There is no assurance that our efforts to train our personnel concerning anti-bribery laws and issues, our efforts to inform our partners, subcontractors, suppliers, agents and others who work for us or on our behalf, or our internal controls and procedures to monitor compliance will always protect us from possible reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees or agents. If we are found to be liable for anti-bribery law violations (either due to our own acts or our inadvertence, or due to the acts or inadvertence of others including our partners, agents, subcontractors or suppliers), we could suffer from criminal or civil penalties or other sanctions, including contract cancellations or debarment, and damaged reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us. Litigation or investigations relating to alleged or suspected violations of anti-bribery laws, even if ultimately such litigation or investigations demonstrate that we did not violate anti-bribery laws, could be costly and could distract management.
We could be adversely impacted if we fail to comply with domestic and international import and export laws.
Our global operations require importing and exporting goods and technology across international borders on a regular basis. Our policies mandate strict compliance with U.S. and foreign international trade laws. To the extent we export technical services, data and products outside of the U.S., we are subject to regulations governing international trade and exports including but not limited to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, the Export Administration Regulations and trade sanctions against embargoed countries, which are administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control within the Department of Treasury. From time to time, we identify certain inadvertent or potential export or related violations. These violations may include, for example, transfers without required governmental authorization. A failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in civil or criminal sanctions, including the imposition of fines, the denial of export privileges, and suspension or debarment from participation in U.S. government contracts.
Employee, agent or partner misconduct or our overall failure to comply with laws or regulations could impair our ability to compete for contracts.
Misconduct, fraud, non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations, or other improper activities by one of our employees, agents or partners could have a significant negative impact on our business and reputation. Such misconduct could include the failure to comply with anti-corruption, export control and environmental regulations; federal procurement regulations, regulations regarding the pricing of labor and other costs in government contracts and regulations regarding the protection of sensitive government information; regulations on lobbying or similar activities; regulations pertaining to the ICFR; and various other applicable laws or regulations. The policies and precautions we take to prevent and detect fraud,
misconduct or failures to comply with applicable laws and regulations may not be effective, and we could face unknown risks or losses. Failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations or acts of fraud or misconduct could subject us to fines and penalties, cancellation of contracts, loss of security clearance and suspension or debarment from contracting with government agencies, which could damage our reputation, weaken our ability to win contracts and have a material adverse impact on us.
New or changing legal requirements could adversely affect us.
Our business and results of operations could be affected by the passage of laws, policies and regulations. The implementation of trade barriers, countervailing duties, or border taxes, or the addition, relaxation or repeal of laws, policies and regulations regarding the industries and sectors in which we work could result in a decline in demand for our services, or may make the manner in which we perform our services, less profitable. Furthermore, changes to existing trade agreements may impact our business operations. We cannot predict when or whether any of these various legislative and regulatory proposals may become law or what their effect will be on us and our clients.
Past and future environmental, safety and health regulations could impose significant additional costs on us.
We are subject to numerous environmental laws and health and safety regulations. Our projects can involve the handling of hazardous and other highly regulated materials, including nuclear and other radioactive materials, which, if improperly handled or disposed of, could subject us to civil and criminal liabilities. It is impossible to reliably predict the full nature and effect of judicial, legislative or regulatory developments relating to health and safety regulations and environmental protection regulations applicable to our operations. The applicable regulations, as well as the length of time available to comply with those regulations, continue to develop and change. The cost of complying with regulations, satisfying any environmental remediation requirements for which we may be found responsible, or satisfying claims or judgments alleging personal injury, property damage or natural resource damages as a result of exposure to, or contamination by, hazardous materials, including as a result of commodities such as lead or asbestos-related products, could be substantial, may not be covered by insurance, could impact profitability and materially impact our operations.
We are subject to a number of regulations such as those from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and non-U.S. regulatory bodies, such as the International Atomic Energy Commission and the European Union, which can have a substantial effect on our nuclear-related projects. Delays in receiving necessary approvals, permits or licenses, the failure to maintain sufficient compliance programs, and other problems encountered during construction (including changes to such regulatory requirements) could have an adverse effect on us.
A substantial portion of our business is generated either directly or indirectly as a result of federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations related to environmental matters. A reduction in the number or scope of these laws or regulations, or changes in government policies regarding the funding, implementation or enforcement of such laws and regulations, could significantly reduce the size of one of our markets and limit our opportunities for growth or reduce our revenue below current levels.
Risks Related to our Equity and Corporate Governance Documents
If we issue additional equity securities, stockholders' ownership percentages would be diluted.
We may in the future issue additional equity securities to pay for potential acquisitions or to otherwise fund our corporate initiatives. If we do issue additional equity securities, the issuance may dilute our earnings per share and stockholders' percentage ownership, to the extent that our existing shareholders do not participate in the issuance.
Delaware law and our charter documents may impede or discourage a takeover or change of control.
Fluor is a Delaware corporation. Various anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law impose impediments on the ability of others to acquire control of us, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our stockholders. In addition, certain provisions of our charters and bylaws may impede or discourage a takeover. For example:
•stockholders may not act by written consent;
•there are various restrictions on the ability of a stockholder to call a special meeting or to nominate a director for election; and
•our Board of Directors can authorize the issuance of preferred shares.
These types of provisions in our charters and bylaws could also make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if the acquisition would be beneficial to our equity holders.