Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Note 1. Background and Nature of Operations
Avangrid, Inc. (AVANGRID, we or the Company) is an energy services holding company engaged in the regulated energy transmission and distribution business through its principal subsidiary, Avangrid Networks, Inc. (Networks), and in the renewable energy generation business through its principal subsidiary, Avangrid Renewables Holding, Inc. (ARHI). ARHI in turn holds subsidiaries including Avangrid Renewables, LLC (Renewables). Iberdrola, S.A. (Iberdrola), a corporation organized under the laws of the Kingdom of Spain, owns 81.6% of the outstanding common stock of AVANGRID. The remaining outstanding shares are owned by various shareholders, with approximately 14.7% of AVANGRID's outstanding shares publicly-traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).
Proposed Merger with PNMR
On October 20, 2020, AVANGRID, PNM Resources, Inc., a New Mexico corporation (PNMR) and NM Green Holdings, Inc., a New Mexico corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of AVANGRID (Merger Sub), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (Merger Agreement), pursuant to which Merger Sub was expected to merge with and into PNMR, with PNMR surviving the Merger as a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of AVANGRID (Merger). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, each issued and outstanding share of the common stock of PNMR (PNMR common stock) (other than (i) the issued shares of PNMR common stock that are owned by AVANGRID, Merger Sub, PNMR or any wholly-owned subsidiary of AVANGRID or PNMR, which will be automatically cancelled at the time the Merger is consummated and (ii) shares of PNMR common stock held by a holder who has not voted in favor of, or consented in writing to, the Merger who is entitled to, and who has demanded, payment for fair value of such shares) will be converted, at the time the Merger is consummated, into the right to receive $50.30 in cash (Merger Consideration).
Consummation of the Merger (Closing) is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain customary closing conditions, including, without limitation, the approval of the Merger Agreement by the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of PNMR common stock entitled to vote thereon, the absence of any material adverse effect on PNMR, the receipt of certain required regulatory approvals (including approvals from the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT), the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission (NMPRC), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and approval under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR)), the Four Corners Divestiture Agreements (as defined below) being in full force and effect and all applicable regulatory filings associated therewith being made, as well as holders of no more than 15% of the outstanding shares of PNMR common stock validly exercising their dissenters’ rights. On February 12, 2021, the shareholders of PNMR approved the proposed Merger. As of November 1, 2021, the Merger had obtained all regulatory approvals other than from the NMPRC. On November 1, 2021, after public hearing and briefing on the matter, the hearing examiner in the Merger proceeding at the NMPRC issued an unfavorable recommendation related to the amended stipulated agreement entered into by PNMR's subsidiary, Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM), AVANGRID and a number of interveners in the NMPRC proceeding with respect to consideration of the joint Merger application. On December 8, 2021, the NMPRC issued an order rejecting the amended stipulated agreement. On January 3, 2022, AVANGRID and PNM filed a notice of appeal of the December 8, 2021 decision of the NMPRC with the New Mexico Supreme Court. The Statement of Issues was filed on February 2, 2022 and the Brief in Chief was filed on April 7, 2022. On June 14, 2022, the NMPRC filed its Answer Brief. On June 13, 2022, New Energy Economy, an intervener in the Merger proceeding, filed its Answer Brief. AVANGRID's Reply Brief was filed on August 5, 2022. On March 8, 2023, AVANGRID, PNM and the NMPRC filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and remand the proceeding back to the NMPRC for further proceedings. The motion states that, once granted, AVANGRID and PNM intend to file a motion for rehearing and/or reconsideration at the NMPRC. One party opposed the motion and certain other parties have sought clarification regarding the process that the NMPRC would implement on remand.
On February 24, 2022, the FCC granted an extension to its approval to transfer operating licenses in connection with the Merger, which was further extended on August 9, 2022 and again on February 16, 2023. On May 20, 2022, the NRC issued an order extending the effectiveness of its approval until May 25, 2023, and again on March 14, 2023 until May 25, 2024. Furthermore, a new HSR filing was submitted and the waiting period expired at 11:50 pm on March 10, 2023, providing HSR clearance for another year. On September 21, 2022, New Energy Economy filed a motion to show cause with the NMPRC alleging that AVANGRID and PNM have engaged in a misleading joint advertising and sponsorship strategy and requesting an investigation. AVANGRID and PNM filed a reply to the motion to show cause on October 11, 2022. On December 14, 2022, the NMPRC issued an order denying the motion.
In addition, on January 3, 2022, AVANGRID, PNMR and Merger Sub entered into an Amendment to the Merger Agreement (the First Amendment), pursuant to which AVANGRID, PNMR and Merger Sub each agreed to extend the “End Date” for consummation of the Merger until April 20, 2023. The parties acknowledged in the First Amendment that the required regulatory approval from the NMPRC had not been obtained and that the parties reasonably determined that such outstanding approval would not be obtained by April 20, 2022. In light of this outstanding approval, the parties determined to approve the First Amendment. Subsequently, on April 12, 2023, AVANGRID, PNMR and Merger Sub entered into a Second Amendment to the Merger Agreement (the Second Amendment), pursuant to which AVANGRID, PNMR and Merger Sub each agreed to further extend the “End Date” for consummation of the Merger until July 20, 2023. The parties acknowledged in the Second Amendment that the required regulatory approval from the NMPRC had not been obtained and that the parties reasonably determined that such outstanding approval would not be obtained by April 20, 2023. As amended by the Second Amendment, the Merger Agreement may be terminated by each of AVANGRID and PNMR under certain circumstances, including if the Merger is not consummated by July 20, 2023. During the pendency of the appeal described above, certain required regulatory approvals and consents may expire and AVANGRID and PNMR will reapply and/or apply for extensions of such approvals, as the case may be. We cannot predict the outcome of any other re-applications or requests for extensions of such approvals that may be required.
The Merger Agreement contains representations, warranties and covenants of PNMR, AVANGRID and Merger Sub, which are customary for transactions of this type. In addition, among other things, the Merger Agreement contains a covenant requiring PNMR to, prior to the closing, enter into agreements (Four Corners Divestiture Agreements) providing for, and to make filings required to, exit from all ownership interests in the Four Corners Power Plant, all with the objective of having the closing date for such exit be no later than December 31, 2024.
The Merger Agreement (as amended) provides for certain customary termination rights including the right of either party to terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger is not completed on or before July 20, 2023. The Merger Agreement further provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under certain specified circumstances (including if AVANGRID terminates the Merger Agreement due to a change in recommendation of the board of directors of PNMR or if PNMR terminates the Merger Agreement to accept a superior proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement)), PNMR will be required to pay AVANGRID a termination fee of $130 million. In addition, the Merger Agreement provides that (i) if the Merger Agreement is terminated by either party due to a failure of a regulatory closing condition and such failure is the result of AVANGRID’s breach of its regulatory covenants, or (ii) AVANGRID fails to effect the Closing when all closing conditions have been satisfied and it is otherwise obligated to do so under the Merger Agreement, then, in either such case, upon termination of the Merger Agreement, AVANGRID will be required to pay PNMR a termination fee of $184 million as the sole and exclusive remedy. Upon the termination of the Merger Agreement under certain specified circumstances involving a breach of the Merger Agreement, either PNMR or AVANGRID will be required to reimburse the other party’s reasonable and documented out-of-pocket fees and expenses up to $10 million (which amount will be credited toward, and offset against, the payment of any applicable termination fee).
In connection with the Merger, Iberdrola has provided AVANGRID a commitment letter (Iberdrola Funding Commitment Letter), pursuant to which Iberdrola has unilaterally agreed to provide to AVANGRID, or arrange the provision to AVANGRID of, funds to the extent necessary for AVANGRID to consummate the Merger, up to a maximum aggregate amount of approximately $4,300 million, including the payment of the aggregate Merger Consideration.
On April 15, 2021, AVANGRID entered into a side letter agreement with Iberdrola, which sets forth certain terms and conditions relating to the Iberdrola Funding Commitment Letter (the Side Letter Agreement). The Side Letter Agreement provides that any drawing in the form of indebtedness made by the Corporation pursuant to the Funding Commitment Letter shall bear interest at an interest rate equal to 3-month LIBOR plus 0.75% per annum calculated on the basis of a 360-day year for the actual number of days elapsed and, commencing on the date of the Funding Commitment Letter, we shall pay Iberdrola a facility fee equal to 0.12% per annum on the undrawn portion of the funding commitment set forth in the Funding Commitment Letter.
On May 18, 2021, we issued 77,821,012 shares of common stock in two private placements. Iberdrola purchased 63,424,125 shares and Hyde Member LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Qatar Investment Authority, purchased 14,396,887 shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at the purchase price of $51.40 per share, which was the closing price of the shares of our common stock on the NYSE as of May 11, 2021. Proceeds of the private placements were $4,000 million. $3,000 million of the proceeds were used to repay the Iberdrola Loan. After the effect of the private placements, Iberdrola retained its 81.6% ownership interest in AVANGRID.
Note 2. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.
The accompanying unaudited financial statements are prepared on a consolidated basis and include the accounts of AVANGRID and its consolidated subsidiaries, Networks and ARHI. All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the interim periods have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the interim condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all the information and note disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly our condensed consolidated financial statements for the interim periods described herein. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature, except as otherwise disclosed. The results for the three months ended March 31, 2023, are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2023.
Note 3. Significant Accounting Policies and New Accounting Pronouncements
The new accounting pronouncements we have adopted as of January 1, 2023, and reflected in our condensed consolidated financial statements are described below. There have been no other material changes to the significant accounting policies described in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, except for those described below resulting from the adoption of new authoritative accounting guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB).
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
(a) Disclosure of Supplier Finance Program Obligations
In September 2022, the FASB issued new disclosure requirements for supplier finance programs. These requirements include key terms of the program, the amount of obligations that remain unpaid at the end of an accounting period, a description of where those obligations are presented in the balance sheet and a roll forward of those obligations during the annual period. We adopted the new disclosure requirements pursuant to this guidance on January 1, 2023.
Accounting Pronouncements Issued but Not Yet Adopted
There are no new accounting pronouncements not yet adopted, including those issued since December 31, 2022, that will materially affect our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Note 4. Revenue
We recognize revenue when we have satisfied our obligations under the terms of a contract with a customer, which generally occurs when the control of promised goods or services transfers to the customer. We measure revenue as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for providing those goods or services. Contracts with customers may include multiple performance obligations. For such contracts, we allocate revenue to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price. We generally determine standalone selling prices based on the prices charged to customers. Certain revenues are not within the scope of ASC 606, such as revenues from leasing, derivatives, other revenues that are not from contracts with customers and other contractual rights or obligations, and we account for such revenues in accordance with the applicable accounting standards. We exclude from revenue amounts collected on behalf of third parties, including any such taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities. We do not have any significant payment terms that are material because we receive payment at or shortly after the point of sale.
The following describes the principal activities, by reportable segment, from which we generate revenue. For more detailed information about our reportable segments, refer to Note 13.
Networks Segment
Networks derives its revenue primarily from tariff-based sales of electricity and natural gas service to customers in New York, Connecticut, Maine and Massachusetts with no defined contractual term. For such revenues, we recognize revenues in an amount derived from the commodities delivered to customers. Other major sources of revenue are electricity transmission and wholesale sales of electricity and natural gas.
Tariff-based sales are subject to the corresponding state regulatory authorities, which determine prices and other terms of service through the ratemaking process. The applicable tariffs are based on the cost of providing service. The utilities’ approved
base rates are designed to recover their allowable operating costs, including energy costs, finance costs, and the costs of equity, the last of which reflect our capital ratio and a reasonable return on equity. We traditionally invoice our customers by applying approved base rates to usage. Maine state law prohibits the utility from providing the electricity commodity to customers. In New York, Connecticut and Massachusetts, customers have the option to obtain the electricity or natural gas commodity directly from the utility or from another supplier. For customers that receive their commodity from another supplier, the utility acts as an agent and delivers the electricity or natural gas provided by that supplier. Revenue in those cases is only for providing the service of delivery of the commodity. Networks entities calculate revenue earned but not yet billed based on the number of days not billed in the month, the estimated amount of energy delivered during those days and the estimated average price per customer class for that month. Differences between actual and estimated unbilled revenue are immaterial.
Transmission revenue results from others’ use of the utility’s transmission system to transmit electricity and is subject to FERC regulation, which establishes the prices and other terms of service. Long-term wholesale sales of electricity are based on individual bilateral contracts. Short-term wholesale sales of electricity are generally on a daily basis based on market prices and are administered by the Independent System Operator-New England (ISO-NE) and the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) or PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), as applicable. Wholesale sales of natural gas are generally short-term based on market prices through contracts with the specific customer.
The performance obligation in all arrangements is satisfied over time because the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits as Networks delivers or sells the electricity or natural gas or provides the delivery or transmission service. We record revenue for all of such sales based upon the regulatory-approved tariff and the volume delivered or transmitted, which corresponds to the amount that we have a right to invoice. There are no material initial incremental costs of obtaining a contract in any of the arrangements. Networks does not adjust the promised consideration for the effects of a significant financing component if it expects, at contract inception, that the time between the delivery of promised goods or service and customer payment will be one year or less. For its New York and Connecticut utilities, Networks assesses its DPAs at each balance sheet date for the existence of significant financing components, but has had no material adjustments as a result.
Certain Networks entities record revenue from Alternative Revenue Programs (ARPs), which is not ASC 606 revenue. Such programs represent contracts between the utilities and their regulators. The Networks ARPs include revenue decoupling mechanisms (RDMs), other ratemaking mechanisms, annual revenue requirement reconciliations and other demand side management programs. The Networks entities recognize and record only the initial recognition of “originating” ARP revenues (when the regulatory-specified conditions for recognition have been met). When they subsequently include those amounts in the price of utility service billed to customers, they record such amounts as a recovery of the associated regulatory asset or liability. When they owe amounts to customers in connection with ARPs, they evaluate those amounts on a quarterly basis and include them in the price of utility service billed to customers and do not reduce ARP revenues.
Networks also has various other sources of revenue including billing, collection, other administrative charges, sundry billings, rent of utility property and miscellaneous revenue. It classifies such revenues as other ASC 606 revenues to the extent they are not related to revenue generating activities from leasing, derivatives or ARPs.
Renewables Segment
Renewables derives its revenue primarily from the sale of energy, transmission, capacity and other related charges from its renewable wind, solar and thermal energy generating sources. For such revenues, we will recognize revenues in an amount derived from the commodities delivered and from services as they are made available. Renewables has bundled power purchase agreements consisting of electric energy, transmission, capacity and/or renewable energy credits (RECs). The related contracts are generally long-term with no stated contract amount, that is, the customer is entitled to all or a percentage of the unit’s output. Renewables also has unbundled sales of electric energy and capacity, RECs and natural gas, which are generally for periods of less than a year. The performance obligations in substantially all of both bundled and unbundled arrangements for electricity and natural gas are satisfied over time, for which we record revenue based on the amount invoiced to the customer for the actual energy delivered. The performance obligation for stand-alone RECs is satisfied at a point in time, for which we record revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied upon delivery of the REC. There are no material initial incremental costs of obtaining a contract or significant financing elements in any of the arrangements.
Renewables classifies certain contracts for the sale of electricity as derivatives, in accordance with the applicable accounting standards. Renewables also has revenue from its energy trading operations, which it generally classifies as derivative revenue. However, trading contracts not classified as derivatives are within the scope of ASC 606, with the performance obligation of the delivery of energy (electricity, natural gas) and settlement of the contracts satisfied at a point in time at which time we recognize the revenue. Renewables also has other ASC 606 revenue, which we recognize based on the amount invoiced to the customer.
Certain customers may receive cash credits, which we account for as variable consideration. Renewables estimates those amounts based on the expected amount to be provided to customers and reduces revenues recognized. We believe that there will not be significant changes to our estimates of variable consideration.
Other
Other, which does not represent a segment, includes miscellaneous Corporate revenues and intersegment eliminations.
Contract Costs and Contract Liabilities
We recognize an asset for incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer when we expect the benefit of those costs to be longer than one year. We have contract assets for costs from development success fees, which we paid during the solar asset development period in 2018, and will amortize ratably into expense over the 15-year life of the power purchase agreement (PPA), expected to commence in November 2023 upon commercial operation. Contract assets totaled $9 million at both March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, and are presented in "Other non-current assets" on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
We have contract liabilities for revenue from transmission congestion contract (TCC) auctions, for which we receive payment at the beginning of an auction period, and amortize ratably each month into revenue over the applicable auction period. The auction periods range from six months to two years. TCC contract liabilities totaled $16 million and $33 million at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, and are presented in "Other current liabilities" on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We recognized $17 million and $8 million as revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Revenues disaggregated by major source for our reportable segments for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 |
| | | | | | | | | | Networks | | Renewables | | Other (b) | | Total |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Regulated operations – electricity | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,308 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,308 | |
Regulated operations – natural gas | | | | | | | | | | 722 | | | — | | | — | | | 722 | |
Nonregulated operations – wind | | | | | | | | | | — | | | 216 | | | — | | | 216 | |
Nonregulated operations – solar | | | | | | | | | | — | | | 4 | | | — | | | 4 | |
Nonregulated operations – thermal | | | | | | | | | | — | | | 55 | | | — | | | 55 | |
Other(a) | | | | | | | | | | (3) | | | (13) | | | — | | | (16) | |
Revenue from contracts with customers | | | | | | | | | | 2,027 | | | 262 | | | — | | | 2,289 | |
Leasing revenue | | | | | | | | | | 2 | | | — | | | — | | | 2 | |
Derivative gains | | | | | | | | | | — | | | 122 | | | — | | | 122 | |
Alternative revenue programs | | | | | | | | | | 37 | | | — | | | — | | | 37 | |
Other revenue | | | | | | | | | | 10 | | | 6 | | | — | | | 16 | |
Total operating revenues | | | | | | | | | | $ | 2,076 | | | $ | 390 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,466 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 | |
| | Networks | | Renewables | | Other (b) | | Total | | | | | | | |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Regulated operations – electricity | | $ | 1,170 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,170 | | | | | | | | |
Regulated operations – natural gas | | 721 | | | — | | | — | | | 721 | | | | | | | | |
Nonregulated operations – wind | | — | | | 220 | | | — | | | 220 | | | | | | | | |
Nonregulated operations – solar | | — | | | 7 | | | — | | | 7 | | | | | | | | |
Nonregulated operations – thermal | | — | | | 13 | | | — | | | 13 | | | | | | | | |
Other(a) | | 22 | | | 16 | | | — | | | 38 | | | | | | | | |
Revenue from contracts with customers | | 1,913 | | | 256 | | | — | | | 2,169 | | | | | | | | |
Leasing revenue | | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | 3 | | | | | | | | |
Derivative losses | | — | | | (63) | | | — | | | (63) | | | | | | | | |
Alternative revenue programs | | 12 | | | — | | | — | | | 12 | | | | | | | | |
Other revenue | | 7 | | | 5 | | | — | | | 12 | | | | | | | | |
Total operating revenues | | $ | 1,935 | | | $ | 198 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,133 | | | | | | | | |
(a) Primarily includes certain intra-month trading activities, billing, collection and administrative charges, sundry billings and other miscellaneous revenue.
(b) Does not represent a segment. Includes Corporate and intersegment eliminations.
As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, accounts receivable balances related to contracts with customers were approximately $1,603 million and $1,622 million, respectively, including unbilled revenues of $410 million and $541 million, which are included in “Accounts receivable and unbilled revenues, net” on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
As of March 31, 2023, the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of March 31, 2023 | | 2024 | | 2025 | | 2026 | | 2027 | | 2028 | | Thereafter | | Total |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue expected to be recognized on multiyear retail energy sales contracts in place | | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
Revenue expected to be recognized on multiyear capacity and carbon-free energy sale contracts | | 85 | | | 12 | | | 10 | | | 7 | | | 5 | | | 60 | | | 179 | |
Revenue expected to be recognized on multiyear renewable energy credit sale contracts | | 53 | | | 23 | | | 5 | | | 3 | | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 87 | |
Total operating revenues | | $ | 139 | | | $ | 35 | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 62 | | | $ | 267 | |
As of March 31, 2023, the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) for the remainder of 2023 was $109 million.
We do not disclose information about remaining performance obligations for contracts for which we recognize revenue in the amount to which we have the right to invoice (e.g., usage-based pricing terms).
Note 5. Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Pursuant to the requirements concerning accounting for regulated operations, our utilities capitalize as regulatory assets incurred and accrued costs that are probable of recovery in future electric and natural gas rates. We base our assessment of whether recovery is probable on the existence of regulatory orders that allow for recovery of certain costs over a specific period, or allow for reconciliation or deferral of certain costs. When costs are not treated in a specific regulatory order, we use regulatory precedent to determine if recovery is probable. Our operating utilities also record, as regulatory liabilities, obligations to refund previously collected revenue or to spend revenue collected from customers on future costs. The primary items that are not included in rate base or accruing carrying costs are regulatory assets for qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, which reflect unrecognized actuarial gains and losses; debt premium; environmental remediation costs, which are primarily the offset of accrued liabilities for future spending; unfunded future income taxes, which are the offset to the unfunded future deferred income tax liability recorded; asset retirement obligations; hedge losses; and contracts for differences. As of March 31, 2023, the total net amount of these items is approximately $1,012 million.
CMP Distribution Rate Case
In an order issued on February 19, 2020, the MPUC authorized an increase in CMP's distribution revenue requirement of $17 million, or approximately 7.00%, based on an allowed ROE of 9.25% and a 50.00% equity ratio. The rate increase was effective March 1, 2020. Commencing on March 1, 2020, the MPUC also imposed a 1.00% ROE reduction (to 8.25%) for management efficiency associated with CMP’s customer service performance following the implementation of its new billing system in 2017 which would be removed after demonstrating satisfactory customer service performance. In September 2021, CMP met the 18-month required rolling average satisfactory customer service benchmarks and filed with the MPUC a request for removal of the management efficiency adjustment, which was approved by the MPUC effective as of its February 18, 2022 order.
The order provided additional funding for staffing increases, vegetation management programs and storm restoration costs, while retaining the basic tiered structure for storm cost recovery implemented in the 2014 stipulation. The MPUC order also retained the RDM implemented in 2014. The order denied CMP’s request to increase rates for higher costs associated with services provided by its affiliates and ordered the initiation of a management audit to evaluate whether CMP's current management structure, and the management and other services from its affiliates, are appropriate and in the interest of Maine customers. The management audit was commenced in July 2020 by the MPUC's consultants and culminated with a report issued by the MPUC’s consultants in July 2021. On February 18, 2022, the MPUC opened a narrowly tailored follow-on investigation examining how CMP and its customers are affected by decisions made at the CMP corporate parent level about earnings, capital budgeting, and planning. In this context, the investigation will also examine regulatory approaches and structures including ratemaking and performance mechanisms. In an order dated February 7, 2023, the MPUC closed this investigation after consolidating its records with CMP’s pending rate case.
In accordance with Chapter 120 of MPUC Rules, on May 26, 2022, CMP filed a nonbinding notice of intent to file a distribution rate case on or after sixty days from the issuance of the letter. In the notice, CMP signaled its intent to propose a three-year rate plan, which includes a multi-year capital investment plan to fund investments needed to improve reliability and
resiliency, as well as to continue to improve the customer experience and cost-effectively advance clean energy transformation. CMP’s notice estimated a revenue change in the range of $45 to $50 million in the first year of the rate plan followed by increases in the range of $25 to $30 million in the second year and $20 to $25 million in the third year. We cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
On August 11, 2022, CMP filed a three-year rate plan, with adjustments to the distribution revenue requirement in each year. In its filing, CMP has set the three rate years as May 10, 2023 to May 9, 2024 (“Rate Year 1”); May 10, 2024 to May 9, 2025 (“Rate Year 2”); and May 10, 2025 to May 9, 2026 (“Rate Year 3”). The requested Rate Year revenue requirement increases for the rate years are $48 million, $28 million and $23 million, respectively. The revenue requirement adjustments are based on a test year ending December 31, 2021. The requested revenue changes for each rate year of the proposal are subject to four adjustment mechanisms: (1) a yearly review of plant additions with potential downward reconciliation in the event of an underspend, (2) a capital adjustment mechanism for certain incremental pole replacements, broadband work, electric vehicle work, energy storage projects, and metering system upgrades, (3) a symmetrical inflation reconciliation adjustment, and (4) reconciliation of the benefits associated with the tax basis repair deduction. Other parties filed direct testimony in this proceeding on December 2, 2022 and CMP filed rebuttal testimony on February 7, 2023. Settlement discussions are on-going and technical conferences are scheduled for mid-May 2023. New rates are expected to take effect on or around August 2023. We cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
NYSEG and RG&E Rate Plans
On November 19, 2020, the NYPSC approved a new three-year rate plan for NYSEG & RG&E (2020 Joint Proposal), with modifications to the rate increases at the two electric businesses. The effective date of new tariffs was December 1, 2020 with a make-whole provision back to April 17, 2020. The proposed rates facilitate the companies’ transition to a cleaner energy future while allowing for important initiatives such as COVID-19 relief for customers and additional funding for vegetation management, hardening/resiliency and emergency preparedness. The rate plans continue the RAM designed to return or collect certain defined reconciled revenues and costs, have new depreciation rates and continue existing RDMs for each business. The 2020 Joint Proposal bases delivery revenues on an 8.80% ROE and 48.00% equity ratio; however, for the proposed earnings sharing mechanism, the equity ratio is the lower of the actual equity ratio or 50.00%. The below table provides a summary of the approved delivery rate increases and delivery rate percentages, including rate levelization and excluding energy efficiency, which is a pass-through, for all four businesses. Rate years two and three commence on May 1, 2021 and 2022, respectively:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year 1 | | Year 2 | | Year 3 |
| | Rate Increase | | Delivery Rate % | | Rate Increase | | Delivery Rate % | | Rate Increase | | Delivery Rate % |
Utility | | (Millions) | | Increase | | (Millions) | | Increase | | (Millions) | | Increase |
NYSEG Electric | | $ | 34 | | 4.6 | % | | $ | 46 | | | 5.9 | % | | $ | 36 | | | 4.2 | % |
NYSEG Gas | | $ | — | | — | % | | $ | 2 | | | 0.8 | % | | $ | 3 | | | 1.6 | % |
RG&E Electric | | $ | 17 | | 3.8 | % | | $ | 14 | | | 3.2 | % | | $ | 16 | | | 3.3 | % |
RG&E Gas | | $ | — | | — | % | | $ | — | | | — | % | | $ | 2 | | | 1.3 | % |
On May 26, 2022, NYSEG and RG&E filed for a new rate plan with the NYPSC. The rate filings are based on test year 2021 financial results adjusted to the rate year May 1, 2023 – April 30, 2024. Since these rate filings were submitted on May 26, 2022, the effective date of new rates, assuming an approximately 11-month approval period, will be May 1, 2023. NYSEG and RG&E filed for a one-year rate plan but expressed interest in exploring a multi-year plan during the pendency of the case (as is the custom in New York). On August 12, 2022, NYSEG and RG&E filed an update to its rate plan filing called for in the litigation schedule. In their filings, the following revenue changes were requested:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Requested Revenue Change |
| | May 26, 2022 | | August 12, 2022 | | Difference |
Utility | | (Millions) | | (Millions) | | (Millions) |
NYSEG Electric | | $ | 274 | | $ | 274 | | $ | — |
NYSEG Gas | | $ | 43 | | $ | 30 | | $ | (13) |
RG&E Electric | | $ | 94 | | $ | 93 | | $ | (1) |
RG&E Gas | | $ | 38 | | $ | 32 | | $ | (6) |
On September 16, 2022, the NYPSC suspended new tariffs and rates through April 21, 2023. On October 19, 2022, consistent with the Administrative Law Judge’s’ July 1, 2022 Ruling on Schedule and Party Status, NYSEG and RG&E voluntarily agreed to 60-day extension of maximum suspension period through June 20, 2023, subject to a make-whole provision. On December
21, 2022, NYSEG and RG&E voluntarily agreed to further 60-day extension of maximum suspension period to postpone through August 19, 2023, subject to a make-whole provision. On February 16, 2023, NYSEG and RG&E voluntarily agreed to a further 30-day extension of the suspension period through September 18, 2023, subject to a make-whole provision. On April 11, 2023, the NYSEG and RG&E requested a further 30-day suspension through October 18, 2023, subject to a make-whole provision. During this time, the parties have conducted multi-party rate case settlement negotiations. We cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding.
UI, CNG, SCG and BGC Rate Plans
In 2016, the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) approved new distribution rate schedules for The United Illuminating Company (UI) for three years, which became effective January 1, 2017 and, among other things, provide for annual tariff increases and an ROE of 9.10% based on a 50.00% equity ratio, continued UI’s existing earnings sharing mechanism (ESM) pursuant to which UI and its customers share on a 50/50 basis all distribution earnings above the allowed ROE in a calendar year, continued the existing decoupling mechanism and approved the continuation of the requested storm reserve. Any dollars due to customers from the ESM continue to be first applied against any storm regulatory asset balance (if one exists at that time) or refunded to customers through a bill credit if such storm regulatory asset balance does not exist.
On September 9, 2022, UI filed a distribution revenue requirement case. UI’s filing proposes a three-year rate plan commencing September 1, 2023 through August 31, 2026. The filing is based on a test year ending December 31, 2021, for the rate years beginning September 1, 2023 (“UI Rate Year 1”), September 1, 2024 (“UI Rate Year 2”), and September 1, 2025 (“UI Rate Year 3”). UI is requesting that PURA approve new distribution rates to recover an increase in revenue requirements of approximately $102 million in UI Rate Year 1, an incremental approximately $17 million in UI Rate Year 2, and an incremental approximately $17 million in UI Rate Year 3, compared to total revenues that would otherwise be recovered under UI’s current rate schedules. UI’s Rate Plan also includes several measures to moderate the impact of the proposed rate update for all customers, including, without limitation a rate levelization proposal to spread the proposed total rate increase over the three rate years, which would result in a change in revenue in UI Rate Year 1 of approximately $54 million. Other parties filed direct testimony on December 13, 2022 and UI filed its rebuttal testimony on January 6, 2023. Rate case hearings started on February 16, 2023 and concluded on March 22, 2023 with initial briefs due April 27, 2023. Litigation of the case is expected to take approximately one year with new rates expected to go into effect on or around September 2023. We cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
In 2017, PURA approved new tariffs for the Southern Connecticut Gas Company (SCG) effective January 1, 2018 for a three-year rate plan with annual rate increases. The new tariffs also include an RDM and Distribution Integrity Management Program (DIMP) mechanism, ESM, the amortization of certain regulatory liabilities (most notably accumulated hardship deferral balances and certain accumulated deferred income taxes) and tariff increases based on an ROE of 9.25% and an equity ratio of approximately 52.00%. Any dollars due to customers from the ESM will be first applied against any environmental regulatory asset balance as defined in the settlement agreement (if one exists at that time) or refunded to customers through a bill credit if such environmental regulatory asset balance does not exist.
In 2018, PURA approved new tariffs for Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation (CNG) effective January 1, 2019 for a three-year rate plan with annual rate increases. The new tariffs continued the RDM and DIMP mechanism. ESM and tariff increases are based on an ROE of 9.30% and an equity ratio of 54.00% in 2019, 54.50% in 2020 and 55.00% in 2021.
On June 24, 2022, BGC filed a Settlement Agreement with the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office (AGO) for DPU approval. The Settlement Agreement followed BGC’s December 14, 2021 filing of a Notice of Intent to File Rate Schedules. Following that filing, BGC and the AGO negotiated the Settlement Agreement in lieu of a fully litigated rate case before the DPU. The Settlement Agreement allows for agreed-upon adjustments to BGC’s revenue requirement as well as various step increases BGC shall be entitled to on January 1, 2023 and January 1, 2024. The Settlement Agreement provides that it shall be void unless approved in its entirety by the DPU by November 1, 2022. It provides for the opportunity to increase BGC’s revenue requirement by as much as $5.6 million over current rates (reflective of a 9.70% ROE and a 54.00% equity ratio as well as other stepped adjustments) through January 1, 2024. The Settlement Agreement was approved in its entirety by the DPU on October 27, 2022, and new rates went into effect January 1, 2023.
Connecticut Energy Legislation
On October 7, 2020, the Governor of Connecticut signed into law an energy bill that, among other things, instructs PURA to revise the rate-making structure in Connecticut to adopt performance-based rates for each electric distribution company, increases the maximum civil penalties assessable for failures in emergency preparedness, and provides for certain penalties and reimbursements to customers after storm outages greater than 96 hours and extends rate case timelines.
Pursuant to the legislation, on October 30, 2020, PURA re-opened a docket related to new rate designs and review, expanding the scope to consider (a) the implementation of an interim rate decrease; (b) low-income rates; and (c) economic development
rates. Separately, UI was due to make its annual RAM filing on March 8, 2021 for the approval of its RAM Rate Components reconciliations: Generation Services Charges, By-passable Federally Mandated Congestion Costs, System Benefits Charge, Transmission Adjustment Charge and RDM.
On March 9, 2021, UI, jointly with the Office of the CT Attorney General, the Office of CT Consumer Counsel, DEEP and PURA’s Office of Education, Outreach, and Enforcement entered into a settlement agreement and filed a motion to approve the settlement agreement, which addressed issues in both dockets.
In an order dated June 23, 2021, PURA approved the as amended settlement agreement in its entirety and it was executed by the parties. The settlement agreement includes a contribution by UI of $5 million and provides customers rate credits of $50 million while allowing UI to collect $52 million in RAM, all over a 22-month period ending April 2023 and also includes a distribution base rate freeze through April 2023.
Pursuant to the legislation, PURA opened a docket to consider the implementation of the associated customer compensation and reimbursement provisions in emergency events where customers were without power for more than 96 consecutive hours. On June 30, 2021, PURA issued a final decision implementing the legislative mandate to create a program pursuant to which residential customers will receive $25 for each day without power after 96 hours and also receive reimbursement of $250 for spoiled food and medicine. The decision emphasizes that no costs incurred in connection with this program are recoverable from customers. The Company is reviewing the requirements of this program and evaluating next steps.
PURA Investigation of the Preparation for and Response to the Tropical Storm Isaias and Connecticut Storm Reimbursement Legislation
On August 6, 2020, PURA opened a docket to investigate the preparation for and response to Tropical Storm Isaias by the electric distribution companies in Connecticut including UI. Following hearings and the submission of testimony, PURA issued a final decision on April 15, 2021, finding that UI “generally met standards of acceptable performance in its preparation and response to Tropical Storm Isaias," subject to certain exceptions noted in the decision, but ordered a 15-basis point reduction to UI's ROE in its next rate case to incentivize better performance and indicated that penalties could be forthcoming in the penalty phase of the proceedings. On June 11, 2021, UI filed an appeal of PURA’s decision with the Connecticut Superior Court.
On May 6, 2021, in connection with its findings in the Tropical Storm Isaias docket, PURA issued a Notice of Violation to UI for allegedly failing to comply with standards of acceptable performance in emergency preparation or restoration of service in an emergency and with orders of the Authority, and for violations of accident reporting requirements. PURA assessed a civil penalty in the total amount of approximately $2 million. PURA held a hearing on this matter and, in an order dated July 14, 2021, reduced the civil penalty to approximately $1 million. UI filed an appeal of PURA’s decision with the Connecticut Superior Court. This appeal and the appeal of PURA’s decision on the Tropical Storm Isaias docket have been consolidated. Oral arguments were held on October 11, 2022, and on October 17, 2022, the court denied UI’s appeal and affirmed PURA’s decisions in their entirety. UI filed a notice of appeal to Connecticut's Appellate court on November 7, 2022. We cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding.
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities shown in the tables below result from various regulatory orders that allow for the deferral and/or reconciliation of specific costs. Regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities are classified as current when recovery or refund in the coming year is allowed or required through a specific order or when the rates related to a specific regulatory asset or regulatory liability are subject to automatic annual adjustment.
Regulatory assets as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | December 31, |
As of | | 2023 | | 2022 |
(Millions) | | | | |
Pension and other post-retirement benefits cost deferrals | | $ | 363 | | | $ | 365 | |
Pension and other post-retirement benefits | | 70 | | | 93 | |
Storm costs | | 766 | | | 671 | |
Rate adjustment mechanism | | 55 | | | 41 | |
Revenue decoupling mechanism | | 66 | | | 52 | |
Transmission revenue reconciliation mechanism | | 7 | | | 11 | |
Contracts for differences | | 52 | | | 56 | |
Hardship programs | | 31 | | | 33 | |
Plant decommissioning | | 1 | | | 1 | |
Deferred purchased gas | | 9 | | | 56 | |
| | | | |
Environmental remediation costs | | 247 | | | 248 | |
Debt premium | | 62 | | | 64 | |
Unamortized losses on reacquired debt | | 20 | | | 19 | |
Unfunded future income taxes | | 504 | | | 492 | |
Federal tax depreciation normalization adjustment | | 135 | | | 137 | |
Asset retirement obligation | | 20 | | | 20 | |
Deferred meter replacement costs | | 57 | | | 55 | |
COVID-19 cost recovery and late payment surcharge | | 14 | | 17 |
Low income arrears forgiveness | | 68 | | 31 |
Excess generation service charge | | 77 | | 24 |
System Expansion | | 16 | | 21 |
Non-bypassable charge | | 46 | | 14 |
Hedges losses | | 50 | | | 13 | |
Other | | 226 | | | 234 | |
Total regulatory assets | | 2,962 | | | 2,768 | |
Less: current portion | | 489 | | | 447 | |
Total non-current regulatory assets | | $ | 2,473 | | | $ | 2,321 | |
“Pension and other post-retirement benefits” represent the actuarial losses on the pension and other post-retirement plans that will be reflected in customer rates when they are amortized and recognized in future pension expenses.
“Pension and other post-retirement benefits cost deferrals” include the difference between actual expense for pension and other post-retirement benefits and the amount provided for in rates for certain of our regulated utilities. A portion of this balance is amortized through current rates, the remaining portion will be refunded in future periods through future rate cases.
“Storm costs” for CMP, NYSEG, RG&E and UI are allowed in rates based on an estimate of the routine costs of service restoration. The companies are also allowed to defer unusually high levels of service restoration costs resulting from major storms when they meet certain criteria for severity and duration. A portion of this balance is amortized through current rates, and the remaining portion will be determined through future rate cases.
“Rate adjustment mechanism” represents an interim rate change to return or collect certain defined reconciled revenues and costs for NYSEG and RG&E following the approval of the Joint Proposal by the NYPSC. The RAM, when triggered, is implemented in rates on July 1 of each year for return or collection over a twelve-month period.
"Revenue decoupling mechanism" represents the mechanism established to disassociate the utility's profits from its delivery/commodity sales.
"Transmission revenue reconciliation mechanism" reflects differences in actual costs in the rate year from those used to set rates. This mechanism contains the Annual Transmission True up (ATU), which is recovered over the subsequent June to May
period.
“Contracts for Differences” represent the deferral of unrealized gains and losses on contracts for differences derivative contracts. The balance fluctuates based upon quarterly market analysis performed on the related derivatives. The amounts, which do not earn a return, are fully offset by a corresponding derivative asset/liability.
“Hardship Programs” represent hardship customer accounts deferred for future recovery to the extent they exceed the amount in rates.
“Plant decommissioning” represents decommissioning and demolition expenses related to closing fossil plant facilities - Beebe & Russell.
“Deferred Purchased Gas” represents the difference between actual gas costs and gas costs collected in rates.
“Environmental remediation costs” includes spending that has occurred and is eligible for future recovery in customer rates. Environmental costs are currently recovered through a reserve mechanism whereby projected spending is included in rates with any variance recorded as a regulatory asset or a regulatory liability. The amortization period will be established in future proceedings and will depend upon the timing of spending for the remediation costs. It also includes the anticipated future rate recovery of costs that are recorded as environmental liabilities since these will be recovered when incurred. Because no funds have yet been expended for the regulatory asset related to future spending, it does not accrue carrying costs and is not included within rate base.
“Debt premium” represents the regulatory asset recorded to offset the fair value adjustment to the regulatory component of the non-current debt of UIL at the acquisition date. This amount is being amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the related outstanding debt instruments.
“Unamortized losses on reacquired debt” represent deferred losses on debt reacquisitions that will be recovered over the remaining original amortization period of the reacquired debt.
“Unfunded future income taxes” represent unrecovered federal and state income taxes primarily resulting from regulatory flow through accounting treatment and are the offset to the unfunded future deferred income tax liability recorded. The income tax benefits or charges for certain plant related timing differences, such as removal costs, are immediately flowed through to, or collected from, customers. This amount is being amortized as the amounts related to temporary differences that give rise to the deferrals are recovered in rates. These amounts are being collected over a period of 46 years, and the NYPSC staff has initiated an audit, as required, of the unfunded future income taxes and other tax assets to verify the balances.
“Federal tax depreciation normalization adjustment” represents the revenue requirement impact of the difference in the deferred income tax expense required to be recorded under the IRS normalization rules and the amount of deferred income tax expense that was included in cost of service for rate years covering 2011 forward. The recovery period in New York is from 25 to 35 years and for CMP 32.5 years beginning in 2020.
“Asset retirement obligations” represents the differences in timing of the recognition of costs associated with our AROs and the collection of such amounts through rates. This amount is being amortized at the related depreciation and accretion amounts of the underlying liability.
“Deferred meter replacement costs” represent the deferral of the book value of retired meters which were replaced or are planned to be replaced by AMI meters. This amount is being amortized over the initial depreciation period of related retired meters.
"COVID-19 cost recovery and late payment surcharge" represents: a) deferred COVID-19-related costs in the state of Connecticut based on the order issued by PURA on April 29, 2020, requiring utilities to track COVID-19-related expenses and lost revenue and create a regulatory asset, and b) deferred lost late payment revenue in the state of New York based on the order issued by the NYPSC on June 17, 2022, approving deferral and surcharge/sur-credit mechanism to recover/return deferred balances starting July 1, 2022.
“Low-income arrears forgiveness” represents deferred bill credits in the state of New York based on the order issued by the NYPSC on June 16, 2022, approving deferral of bill credits for low-income customers and recovery of regulatory asset from all customers over five years for RG&E and three years for NYSEG. Surcharge will start August 1, 2022.
“Excess generation service charge” represents deferred generation-related costs or revenues for future recovery from or return to customers. The amount fluctuates based upon timing differences between revenues collected from rates and actual costs incurred.
“System expansion” represents expenses not covered by system expansion rates related to expanding the natural gas system and converting customers to natural gas.
“Non-bypassable charges” represent non-bypassable federally mandated congestion costs or revenues for future recovery from or return to customers. The amount fluctuates based upon timing differences between revenues collected from rates and actual costs incurred.
“Hedge losses” represents the deferred fair value losses on electric and gas hedge contracts.
“Other” includes post-term amortization deferrals and various items subject to reconciliation including debt rate reconciliation and deferred property tax.
Regulatory liabilities as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | December 31, |
As of | | 2023 | | 2022 |
(Millions) | | | | |
Energy efficiency portfolio standard | | $ | 25 | | | $ | 30 | |
Gas supply charge and deferred natural gas cost | | 28 | | | 15 | |
Pension and other post-retirement benefits cost deferrals | | 112 | | | 117 | |
Carrying costs on deferred income tax bonus depreciation | | 5 | | | 9 | |
Carrying costs on deferred income tax - Mixed Services 263(a) | | 2 | | | 3 | |
2017 Tax Act | | 1,218 | | | 1,232 | |
Rate Change Levelization | | 13 | | | 25 | |
Revenue decoupling mechanism | | 8 | | | 13 | |
Accrued removal obligations | | 1,167 | | | 1,178 | |
| | | | |
Economic development | | 17 | | | 20 | |
Positive benefit adjustment | | 14 | | | 16 | |
Theoretical reserve flow thru impact | | 3 | | | 3 | |
Deferred property tax | | 17 | | | 17 | |
Net plant reconciliation | | 9 | | | 11 | |
Debt rate reconciliation | | 27 | | | 32 | |
Rate refund – FERC ROE proceeding | | 36 | | | 36 | |
Transmission congestion contracts | | 32 | | | 31 | |
Merger-related rate credits | | 9 | | | 10 | |
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits | | 22 | | | 22 | |
Asset retirement obligation | | 17 | | | 18 | |
Earning sharing provisions | | 8 | | | 13 | |
Middletown/Norwalk local transmission network service collections | | 16 | | | 17 | |
Low income programs | | 19 | | | 18 | |
Non-firm margin sharing credits | | 24 | | | 27 | |
New York 2018 winter storm settlement | | 1 | | | 1 | |
| | | | |
Non by-passable charges | | 63 | | | 76 | |
Transmission revenue reconciliation mechanism | | 73 | | | 75 | |
Other | | 251 | | | 204 | |
Total regulatory liabilities | | 3,236 | | | 3,269 | |
Less: current portion | | 352 | | | 354 | |
Total non-current regulatory liabilities | | $ | 2,884 | | | $ | 2,915 | |
“Energy efficiency portfolio standard” represents the costs of energy efficiency programs deferred for future recovery to the extent they exceed the amount in rates. A portion of this balance is amortized through current rates, the remaining portion will
be refunded in future periods through future rate cases. The amortization period in current rates is three years and began in 2020.
“Gas supply charge and deferred natural gas cost" reflects the actual costs of purchasing, transporting and storing of natural gas. Gas supply reconciliation is determined by comparing actual gas supply expenses to the monthly gas cost recoveries in rates. Prior rate year balances are collected/returned to customers beginning the next calendar year.
“Pension and other postretirement benefits cost deferrals” include the difference between actual expense for pension and other post-retirement benefits and the amount provided for in rates for certain of our regulated utilities. A portion of this balance is amortized through current rates, the remaining portion will be refunded in future periods through future rate cases.
“Carrying costs on deferred income tax bonus depreciation” represent the carrying costs benefit of increased accumulated deferred income taxes created by the change in tax law allowing bonus depreciation. A portion of this balance is amortized through current rates, the remaining portion will be refunded in future periods through future rate cases. The amortization period in current rates is three years and began in 2020.
"Carrying costs on deferred income tax - Mixed Services 263(a)" represent the carrying costs benefit of increased accumulated deferred income taxes created by Section 263 (a) IRC. A portion of this balance is amortized through current rates, the remaining portion will be refunded in future periods through future rate cases. The amortization period in current rates is three years and began in 2020.
“2017 Tax Act” represents the impact from remeasurement of deferred income tax balances as a result of the Tax Act enacted by the U.S. federal government on December 22, 2017. Reductions in accumulated deferred income tax balances due to the reduction in the corporate income tax rates from 35% to 21% under the provisions of the Tax Act will result in amounts previously and currently collected from utility customers for these deferred taxes to be refundable to such customers, generally through reductions in future rates. The NYPSC, MPUC, PURA, DPU and the FERC held separate proceedings in New York, Maine, Connecticut, Massachusetts and the FERC, respectively, and for the majority of our regulated utilities, authorized the amortization periods for the return of regulatory liabilities and the recovery regulatory assets, including the authorization of sur-credits to return the related benefits to rate payers in certain jurisdictions.
“Rate change levelization" adjusts the New York delivery rate increases across the three-year plan to avoid unnecessary spikes and offsetting dips in customer rates. A portion of this balance is amortized through current rates, the remaining portion will be refunded in future periods through future rate cases. The amortization period in current rates is five years and began in 2020.
“Revenue decoupling mechanism" represents the mechanism established to disassociate the utility's profits from its delivery/commodity sales.
“Accrued removal obligations” represent the differences between asset removal costs recorded and amounts collected in rates for those costs. The amortization period is dependent upon the asset removal costs of underlying assets and the life of the utility plant.
“Economic development” represents the economic development program, which enables NYSEG and RG&E to foster economic development through attraction, expansion and retention of businesses within its service territory. If the level of actual expenditures for economic development allocated to NYSEG and RG&E varies in any rate year from the level provided for in rates, the difference is refunded to customers. A portion of this balance is amortized through current rates, the remaining portion will be refunded in future periods through future rate cases. The amortization period in current rates is three years and began in 2020.
“Positive benefit adjustment” resulted from Iberdrola’s 2008 acquisition of AVANGRID (formerly Energy East Corporation). This is being used to moderate increases in rates. A portion of this balance is amortized through current rates, the remaining portion will be refunded in future periods through future rate cases. The amortization period in current rates is three years and began in 2020.
“Theoretical reserve flow thru impact” represents the differences from the rate allowance for applicable federal and state flow through impacts related to the excess depreciation reserve amortization. It also represents the carrying cost on the differences. A portion of this balance is amortized through current rates, the remaining portion will be refunded in future periods through future rate cases. The amortization period in current rates is three to five years and began in 2020.
“Deferred property tax" represents the difference between actual expense for property taxes recoverable from customers and the amount provided for in rates. A portion of this balance is amortized through current rates, the remaining portion will be refunded in future periods through future rate cases. The amortization period in current rates is five years and began in 2020.
“Net plant reconciliation” represents the reconciliation of the actual electric and gas net plant and book depreciation to the targets set forth in the 2020 Joint Proposal. A portion of this balance is amortized through current rates, the remaining portion will be refunded in future periods through future rate cases. The amortization period in current rates is five years and began in 2020.
“Debt rate reconciliation” represents the over/under collection of costs related to debt instruments identified in the rate case. Costs would include interest, commissions and fees versus amounts included in rates.
“Rate refund - FERC ROE proceeding” represents the reserve associated with the FERC proceeding around the base return on equity (ROE) reflected in ISO New England, Inc.’s (ISO-NE) open access transmission tariff (OATT). See Note 8 for more details.
“Transmission congestion contracts” represents deferral of the Nine Mile 2 Nuclear Plant transmission congestion contract at RG&E. A portion of this balance is amortized through current rates, the remaining portion will be refunded in future periods through future rate cases. The amortization period in current rates is five years and began in 2020.
“Merger-related rate credits” resulted from the acquisition of UIL. This is being used to moderate increases in rates. During both the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, $1 million of rate credits were applied against customer bills.
“Asset retirement obligation” represents the differences in timing of the recognition of costs associated with our AROs and the collection of such amounts through rates. This amount is being amortized at the related depreciation and accretion amounts of the underlying liability.
“Earning sharing provisions” represents the annual earnings over the earnings sharing threshold. A portion of this balance is amortized through current rates, the remaining portion will be refunded in future periods through future rate cases.
“Middletown/Norwalk local transmission network service collections” represents allowance for funds used during construction of the Middletown/Norwalk transmission line, which is being amortized over the useful life of the project.
“Low income programs” represent various hardship and payment plan programs approved for recovery.
“Non-firm margin sharing credits” represents the portion of interruptible and off-system sales revenue set aside to fund gas expansion projects.
“New York 2018 winter storm settlement” represents the settlement amount with the NYPSC following the comprehensive investigation of New York’s major utility companies’ preparation and response to March 2018 storms. The balance is being amortized through current rates over an amortization period of three years, beginning in 2020.
“Other” includes cost of removal being amortized through rates and various items subject to reconciliation.
Note 6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
We determine the fair value of our derivative assets and liabilities and non-current equity investments associated with Networks’ activities utilizing market approach valuation techniques:
•Our equity and other investments consist of Rabbi Trusts. Our Rabbi Trusts, which cover certain deferred compensation plans and non-qualified pension plan obligations, consists of equity and other investments. The Rabbi Trusts primarily invest in equity securities, fixed income and money market funds. Certain Rabbi Trusts also invest in trust or company owned life insurance policies. We measure the fair value of our Rabbi Trust portfolio using observable, unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and include the measurements in Level 1. We measure the fair value of the supplemental retirement benefit life insurance trust based on quoted prices in the active markets for the various funds within which the assets are held and include the measurement in Level 2.
•NYSEG and RG&E enter into electric energy derivative contracts to hedge the forecasted purchases required to serve their electric load obligations. They hedge their electric load obligations using derivative contracts that are settled based upon Locational Based Marginal Pricing published by the NYISO. NYSEG and RG&E hedge approximately 70% of their electric load obligations using contracts for a NYISO location where an active market exists. The forward market prices used to value the companies’ open electric energy derivative contracts are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities with no adjustment required and therefore we include the fair value measurements in Level 1.
•NYSEG and RG&E enter into natural gas derivative contracts to hedge their forecasted purchases required to serve their natural gas load obligations. NYSEG and RG&E hedge up to approximately 55% of its forecasted winter demand
through the use of financial transactions and storage withdrawals. The forward market prices used to value open natural gas derivative contracts are exchange-based prices for the identical derivative contracts traded actively on the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE). We include the fair value measurements in Level 1 because we use prices quoted in an active market.
•NYSEG, RG&E and CMP enter into fuel derivative contracts to hedge their unleaded and diesel fuel requirements for their fleet vehicles. Exchange-based forward market prices are used, but because an unobservable basis adjustment is added to the forward prices, we include the fair value measurement for these contracts in Level 3.
•UI enters into CfDs, which are marked-to-market based on a probability-based expected cash flow analysis that is discounted at risk-free interest rates and an adjustment for non-performance risk using credit default swap rates. We include the fair value measurement for these contracts in Level 3 (See Note 7 for further discussion of CfDs).
We determine the fair value of our derivative assets and liabilities associated with Renewables activities utilizing market approach valuation techniques. Exchange-traded transactions, such as New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) futures contracts, that are based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical products with no adjustment are included in fair value Level 1. Contracts with delivery periods of two years or less which are traded in active markets and are valued with or derived from observable market data for identical or similar products such as over-the-counter NYMEX foreign exchange swaps, and fixed price physical and basis and index trades are included in fair value Level 2. Contracts with delivery periods exceeding two years or that have unobservable inputs or inputs that cannot be corroborated with market data for identical or similar products are included in fair value Level 3. The unobservable inputs include modeled volumes on unit-contingent contracts, extrapolated power curves through May 2032 and scheduling assumptions on California power exports to cover Nevada physical power sales. The valuation for this category is based on our judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists.
We determine the fair value of our interest rate derivative instruments based on a model whose inputs are observable, such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), forward interest rate curves or other relevant benchmark. We include the fair value measurement for these contracts in Level 2 (See Note 12 for further discussion of interest rate contracts).
We determine the fair value of our foreign currency exchange derivative instruments based on current exchange rates compared to the rates at inception of the hedge. We include the fair value measurement for these contracts in Level 2.
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable, lease obligations and interest accrued approximate fair value.
Restricted cash was $3 million as of both March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively and is included in "Other Assets" on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The financial instruments measured at fair value as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of March 31, 2023 | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Netting | | Total |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity investments with readily determinable fair values | | $ | 29 | | | $ | 13 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 42 | |
Derivative assets | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative financial instruments - power | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 58 | | | $ | 134 | | | $ | (137) | | | $ | 70 | |
Derivative financial instruments - gas | | — | | | 26 | | | 4 | | | (22) | | | 8 | |
Contracts for differences | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | 1 | |
Derivative financial instruments – Other | | — | | | 90 | | | — | | | — | | | 90 | |
Total | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 174 | | | $ | 139 | | | $ | (159) | | | $ | 169 | |
Derivative liabilities | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative financial instruments - power | | $ | (55) | | | $ | (245) | | | $ | (72) | | | $ | 288 | | | $ | (84) | |
Derivative financial instruments - gas | | (10) | | | (20) | | | — | | | 29 | | | (1) | |
Contracts for differences | | — | | | — | | | (53) | | | — | | | (53) | |
Derivative financial instruments – Other | | — | | | (95) | | | — | | | — | | | (95) | |
Total | | $ | (65) | | | $ | (360) | | | $ | (125) | | | $ | 317 | | | $ | (233) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2022 | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Netting | | Total |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity investments with readily determinable fair values | | $ | 35 | | | $ | 13 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 48 | |
Derivative assets | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative financial instruments - power | | $ | 37 | | | $ | 55 | | | $ | 165 | | | $ | (177) | | | $ | 80 | |
Derivative financial instruments - gas | | 1 | | | 47 | | | — | | | (45) | | | 3 | |
Contracts for differences | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | 1 | |
Derivative financial instruments – Other | | — | | | 116 | | | — | | | — | | | 116 | |
Total | | $ | 38 | | | $ | 218 | | | $ | 166 | | | $ | (222) | | | $ | 200 | |
Derivative liabilities | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative financial instruments - power | | $ | (46) | | | $ | (350) | | | $ | (93) | | | $ | 364 | | | $ | (125) | |
Derivative financial instruments - gas | | (4) | | | (26) | | | — | | | 30 | | | — | |
Contracts for differences | | — | | | — | | | (57) | | | — | | | (57) | |
Derivative financial instruments - Other | | — | | | (115) | | | — | | | — | | | (115) | |
Total | | $ | (50) | | | $ | (491) | | | $ | (150) | | | $ | 394 | | | $ | (297) | |
The reconciliation of changes in the fair value of financial instruments based on Level 3 inputs for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Three Months Ended March 31, |
(Millions) | | | | | | 2023 | | 2022 |
Fair Value Beginning of Period, | | | | | | $ | 16 | | | $ | (69) | |
Gains recognized in operating revenues | | | | | | — | | | 38 | |
(Losses) recognized in operating revenues | | | | | | (3) | | | (40) | |
Total losses recognized in operating revenues | | | | | | (3) | | | (2) | |
Gains recognized in OCI | | | | | | 11 | | | 2 | |
(Losses) recognized in OCI | | | | | | (3) | | | (63) | |
Total gains (losses) recognized in OCI | | | | | | 8 | | | (61) | |
Net change recognized in regulatory assets and liabilities | | | | | | 4 | | | 4 | |
Purchases | | | | | | 9 | | | (1) | |
Settlements | | | | | | (20) | | | 5 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Fair Value as of March 31, | | | | | | $ | 14 | | | $ | (124) | |
Losses for the period included in operating revenues attributable to the change in unrealized gains relating to financial instruments still held at the reporting date | | | | | | $ | (3) | | | $ | (2) | |
Level 3 Fair Value Measurement
The table below illustrates the significant sources of unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of our Level 3 derivatives and the variability in prices for those transactions classified as Level 3 derivatives.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of March 31, 2023 | | | | |
Index | | Avg. | | Max. | | Min. |
NYMEX ($/MMBtu) | | $ | 4.53 | | | $ | 9.86 | | | $ | 1.99 | |
AECO ($/MMBtu) | | $ | 3.20 | | | $ | 10.80 | | | $ | 1.23 | |
Ameren ($/MWh) | | $ | 54.23 | | | $ | 225.62 | | | $ | 22.08 | |
COB ($/MWh) | | $ | 80.39 | | | $ | 400.10 | | | $ | 10.85 | |
ComEd ($/MWh) | | $ | 49.88 | | | $ | 222.49 | | | $ | 18.78 | |
ERCOT S hub ($/MWh) | | $ | 49.97 | | | $ | 320.63 | | | $ | 16.85 | |
Mid C ($/MWh) | | $ | 77.60 | | | $ | 400.10 | | | $ | 7.85 | |
AEP-DAYTON hub ($/MWh) | | $ | 55.26 | | | $ | 229.75 | | | $ | 24.44 | |
PJM W hub ($/MWh) | | $ | 58.12 | | | $ | 227.60 | | | $ | 24.76 | |
Our Level 3 valuations primarily consist of Hydro PPAs utilized for balancing services for the Northwest wind fleet, power swaps with delivery periods extending through May 2032 hedging Midwest and Texas wind farms and physical power sales agreements in Nevada.
We considered the measurement uncertainty regarding the Level 3 gas and power positions to changes in the valuation inputs. Given the nature of the transactions in Level 3, the primary input to the valuation is the market price of gas or power for transactions with delivery periods exceeding two years. The fixed price power swaps are economic hedges of future power generation, with decreases in power prices resulting in unrealized gains and increases in power prices resulting in unrealized losses. The hydro PPAs are long capacity/energy positions in the Northwest that provide balancing services with increases in power prices resulting in unrealized gains and decreases in power prices resulting in unrealized losses. The gas swaps are economic hedges of fuel purchases for a combined cycle gas plant, with increases in gas prices resulting in unrealized gains and decreases in gas prices resulting in unrealized losses. As all transactions are economic hedges of the underlying position, any changes in the fair value of these transactions will be offset by changes in the anticipated purchase/sales price of the underlying commodity.
Two elements of the analytical infrastructure employed in valuing transactions are the price curves used in the calculation of market value and and the modeled volumes on unit-contingent agreements. We maintain and document authorized trading points and associated forward price curves, and we develop and document models used in valuation of the various products.
Transactions are valued in part on the basis of forward prices and estimated volumes. We maintain and document descriptions of these curves and their derivations. Forward price curves used in valuing the transactions are applied to the full duration of the transaction.
The determination of fair value of the CfDs (see Note 7 for further details on CfDs) was based on a probability-based expected cash flow analysis that was discounted at risk-free interest rates, as applicable, and an adjustment for non-performance risk using credit default swap rates. Certain management assumptions were required, including development of pricing that extends over the term of the contracts. We believe this methodology provides the most reasonable estimates of the amount of future discounted cash flows associated with the CfDs. Additionally, on a quarterly basis, we perform analytics to ensure that the fair value of the derivatives is consistent with changes, if any, in the various fair value model inputs. Significant isolated changes in the risk of non-performance, the discount rate or the contract term pricing would result in an inverse change in the fair value of the CfDs. Additional quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements of the CfDs is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Range at |
Unobservable Input | | March 31, 2023 |
Risk of non-performance | | 0.76% |
Discount rate | | 3.60% - 3.81% |
Forward pricing ($ per KW-month) | | $2.00 - $3.80 |
Fair Value of Debt
As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, debt consisted of first mortgage bonds, unsecured pollution control notes and other various non-current debt securities. The estimated fair value of debt was $8,168 million and $7,991 million as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. The estimated fair value was determined, in most cases, by discounting the future cash flows at market interest rates. The interest rates used to make these calculations take into account the credit ratings of the borrowers in each case. All debt is considered Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Note 7. Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Our operating and financing activities are exposed to certain risks, which are managed by using derivative instruments. All derivative instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities at fair value on our condensed consolidated balance sheets in accordance with the accounting requirements concerning derivative instruments and hedging activities.
(a) Networks activities
The tables below present Networks' derivative positions as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, including those subject to master netting agreements and the location of the net derivative positions on our condensed consolidated balance sheets:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of March 31, 2023 | | Current Assets | | Noncurrent Assets | | Current Liabilities | | Noncurrent Liabilities |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | |
Not designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | |
Derivative assets | | $ | 13 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 12 | | | $ | 3 | |
Derivative liabilities | | (12) | | | (3) | | | (71) | | | (47) | |
| | 1 | | | 1 | | | (59) | | | (44) | |
Designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | |
Derivative assets | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Derivative liabilities | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total derivatives before offset of cash collateral | | 1 | | | 1 | | | (59) | | | (44) | |
Cash collateral receivable | | — | | | — | | | 41 | | | 8 | |
Total derivatives as presented in the balance sheet | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | (18) | | | $ | (36) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2022 | | Current Assets | | Noncurrent Assets | | Current Liabilities | | Noncurrent Liabilities |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | |
Not designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | |
Derivative assets | | $ | 30 | | | $ | 8 | | | $ | 30 | | | $ | 7 | |
Derivative liabilities | | (30) | | | (7) | | | (58) | | | (50) | |
| | — | | | 1 | | | (28) | | | (43) | |
Designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | |
Derivative assets | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Derivative liabilities | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total derivatives before offset of cash collateral | | — | | | 1 | | | (28) | | | (43) | |
Cash collateral receivable | | — | | | — | | | 11 | | | 2 | |
Total derivatives as presented in the balance sheet | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | (17) | | | $ | (41) | |
The net notional volumes of the outstanding derivative instruments associated with Networks' activities as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | December 31, |
As of | | 2023 | | 2022 |
(Millions) | | | | |
Wholesale electricity purchase contracts (MWh) | | 5.6 | | | 5.7 | |
Natural gas purchase contracts (Dth) | | 7.9 | | | 9.6 | |
| | | | |
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
NYSEG and RG&E have an electric commodity charge that passes costs for the market price of electricity through rates. We use electricity contracts, both physical and financial, to manage fluctuations in electricity commodity prices in order to provide price stability to customers. We include the cost or benefit of those contracts in the amount expensed for electricity purchased when the related electricity is sold. We record changes in the fair value of electric hedge contracts to derivative assets and/or liabilities with an offset to regulatory assets and/or regulatory liabilities, in accordance with the accounting requirements concerning regulated operations.
NYSEG and RG&E have purchased gas adjustment clauses that allow us to recover through rates any changes in the market price of purchased natural gas, substantially eliminating our exposure to natural gas price risk. NYSEG and RG&E use natural gas futures and forwards to manage fluctuations in natural gas commodity prices to provide price stability to customers. We include the cost or benefit of natural gas futures and forwards in the commodity cost that is passed on to customers when the related sales commitments are fulfilled. We record changes in the fair value of natural gas hedge contracts to derivative assets and/or liabilities with an offset to regulatory assets and/or regulatory liabilities in accordance with the accounting requirements for regulated operations.
The amounts for electricity hedge contracts and natural gas hedge contracts recognized in regulatory liabilities and assets as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 and amounts reclassified from regulatory assets and liabilities into income for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Millions) | | Loss or Gain Recognized in Regulatory Assets/Liabilities | | Location of Loss (Gain) Reclassified from Regulatory Assets/Liabilities into Income | | | | | | Loss (Gain) Reclassified from Regulatory Assets/Liabilities into Income |
As of | | | | | | | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, |
March 31, 2023 | | Electricity | | Natural Gas | | 2023 | | | | | | | Electricity | | Natural Gas |
Regulatory assets | | $ | 40 | | | $ | 10 | | | Purchased power, natural gas and fuel used | | | | | | $ | 49 | | | $ | 6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2022 | | | | | | 2022 | | | | | | | | | |
Regulatory assets | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 4 | | | Purchased power, natural gas and fuel used | | | | | | $ | (45) | | | $ | (9) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pursuant to a PURA order, UI and Connecticut’s other electric utility, CL&P, each executed two long-term CfDs with certain incremental capacity resources, each of which specifies a capacity quantity and a monthly settlement that reflects the difference between a forward market price and the contract price. The costs or benefits of each contract will be paid by or allocated to
customers and will be subject to a cost-sharing agreement between UI and CL&P pursuant to which approximately 20% of the cost or benefit is borne by or allocated to UI customers and approximately 80% is borne by or allocated to CL&P customers.
PURA has determined that costs associated with these CfDs will be fully recoverable by UI and CL&P through electric rates, and UI has deferred recognition of costs (a regulatory asset) or obligations (a regulatory liability), including carrying costs. For those CfDs signed by CL&P, UI records its approximate 20% portion pursuant to the cost-sharing agreement noted above. As of March 31, 2023, UI has recorded a gross derivative asset of $1 million ($0 of which is related to UI’s portion of the CfD signed by CL&P), a regulatory asset of $52 million, a gross derivative liability of $53 million ($52 million of which is related to UI’s portion of the CfD signed by CL&P) and a regulatory liability of $0. As of December 31, 2022, UI had recorded a gross derivative asset of $1 million ($0 of which is related to UI’s portion of the CfD signed by CL&P), a regulatory asset of $56 million, a gross derivative liability of $57 million ($55 million of which is related to UI’s portion of the CfD signed by CL&P) and a regulatory liability of $0.
The unrealized gains and losses from fair value adjustments to these derivatives, which are recorded in regulatory assets, for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | | | | | 2023 | | 2022 |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Derivative liabilities | | | | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 4 | |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
The effect of derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships on Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) and income for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended March 31, | | Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (a) | | Location of Loss (Gain) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income | | Loss (Gain) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income | | Total amount per Income Statement |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | |
2023 | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate contracts | | $ | — | | | Interest expense | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 95 | |
Commodity contracts | | — | | | Purchased power, natural gas and fuel used | | — | | | 977 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | — | | | | | $ | 1 | | | |
2022 | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate contracts | | $ | — | | | Interest expense | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 71 | |
Commodity contracts | | 2 | | | Purchased power, natural gas and fuel used | | (1) | | | 741 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 2 | | | | | $ | — | | | |
(a) Changes in accumulated OCI are reported on a pre-tax basis.
The net loss in accumulated OCI related to previously settled forward starting swaps and accumulated amortization is $42 million and $43 million as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. For both the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, Networks recorded net derivative losses related to discontinued cash flow hedges of $1 million. Networks will amortize approximately $3 million of discontinued cash flow hedges for the remainder of 2023.
(b) Renewables activities
Renewables sells fixed-price gas and power forwards to hedge our merchant wind assets from declining commodity prices for our Renewables business. Renewables also purchases fixed-price gas and basis swaps and sells fixed-price power in the forward market to hedge the spark spread or heat rate of our merchant thermal assets and enters into tolling arrangements to sell the output of its thermal generation facilities.
Renewables has proprietary trading operations that enter into fixed-price power and gas forwards in addition to basis swaps. The intent is to speculate on fixed-price commodity and basis volatility in the U.S. commodity markets.
Renewables will periodically designate derivative contracts as cash flow hedges for both its thermal and wind portfolios. The fair value changes are recorded in OCI. For thermal operations, Renewables will periodically designate both fixed price NYMEX gas contracts and natural gas basis swaps that hedge the fuel requirements of its Klamath Plant in Klamath, Oregon.
Renewables will also designate fixed price power swaps at various locations in the U.S. market to hedge future power sales from its Klamath facility and various wind farms.
The net notional volumes of outstanding derivative instruments associated with Renewables' activities as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | December 31, |
As of | | 2023 | | 2022 |
(MWh/Dth in millions) | | | | |
Wholesale electricity purchase contracts | | 2 | | | 2 | |
Wholesale electricity sales contracts | | 7 | | | 7 | |
Natural gas and other fuel purchase contracts | | 20 | | | 15 | |
Financial power contracts | | 6 | | | 6 | |
Basis swaps – purchases | | 26 | | | 22 | |
Basis swaps – sales | | 2 | | | — | |
The fair values of derivative contracts associated with Renewables' activities as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | December 31, |
As of | | 2023 | | 2022 |
(Millions) | | | | |
Wholesale electricity purchase contracts | | $ | 110 | | | $ | 149 | |
Wholesale electricity sales contracts | | (134) | | | (200) | |
Natural gas and other fuel purchase contracts | | 8 | | | 2 | |
Financial power contracts | | 9 | | | 8 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | (7) | | | $ | (41) | |
On May 27, 2021, Renewables entered into a forward interest rate swap, with a total notional amount of $935 million, to hedge the issuance of forecasted variable rate debt. The forward interest rate swap is designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge. As part of the financial close of Vineyard Wind 1 described in Note 19, this hedge was novated to the lending institutions and the notional value changed to $956 million. As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the fair value of the interest rate swap was $90 million and $116 million, respectively, as a non-current asset. The gain or loss on the interest rate swap is reported as a component of accumulated OCI and will be reclassified into earnings in the period or periods during which the related interest expense on the debt is incurred.
The tables below present Renewables' derivative positions as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, including those subject to master netting agreements and the location of the net derivative position on our condensed consolidated balance sheets:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of March 31, 2023 | | Current Assets | | Noncurrent Assets | | Current Liabilities | | Noncurrent Liabilities |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | |
Not designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | |
Derivative assets | | $ | 106 | | | $ | 49 | | | $ | 53 | | | $ | 5 | |
Derivative liabilities | | (42) | | | (36) | | | (77) | | | (6) | |
| | 64 | | | 13 | | | (24) | | | (1) | |
Designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | |
Derivative assets | | — | | | 90 | | | 4 | | | 4 | |
Derivative liabilities | | — | | | — | | | (102) | | | (74) | |
| | — | | | 90 | | | (98) | | | (70) | |
Total derivatives before offset of cash collateral | | 64 | | | 103 | | | (122) | | | (71) | |
Cash collateral receivable | | — | | | — | | | 70 | | | 39 | |
Total derivatives as presented in the balance sheet | | $ | 64 | | | $ | 103 | | | $ | (52) | | | $ | (32) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2022 | | Current Assets | | Noncurrent Assets | | Current Liabilities | | Noncurrent Liabilities |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | |
Not designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | |
Derivative assets | | $ | 121 | | | $ | 63 | | | $ | 79 | | | $ | 4 | |
Derivative liabilities | | (61) | | | (40) | | | (103) | | | (7) | |
| | 60 | | | 23 | | | (24) | | | (3) | |
Designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | |
Derivative assets | | — | | | 116 | | | — | | | 1 | |
Derivative liabilities | | — | | | — | | | (168) | | | (89) | |
| | — | | | 116 | | | (168) | | | (88) | |
Total derivatives before offset of cash collateral | | 60 | | | 139 | | | (192) | | | (91) | |
Cash collateral receivable | | — | | | — | | | 105 | | | 54 | |
Total derivatives as presented in the balance sheet | | $ | 60 | | | $ | 139 | | | $ | (87) | | | $ | (37) | |
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
The effects of trading and non-trading derivatives associated with Renewables' activities for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 |
| | | | | | | | Trading | | Non-trading | | Total amount per income statement |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wholesale electricity purchase contracts | | | | | | | | $ | (4) | | | $ | 1 | | | |
Wholesale electricity sales contracts | | | | | | | | 7 | | | 24 | | | |
Financial power contracts | | | | | | | | 2 | | | 15 | | | |
Financial and natural gas contracts | | | | | | | | — | | | 10 | | | |
Total gain included in operating revenues | | | | | | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 50 | | | $ | 2,466 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchased power, natural gas and fuel used | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wholesale electricity purchase contracts | | | | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | (35) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial power contracts | | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | |
Financial and natural gas contracts | | | | | | | | — | | | (21) | | | |
Total loss included in purchased power, natural gas and fuel used | | | | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | (56) | | | $ | 977 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Gain (Loss) | | | | | | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | (6) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 |
| | | | | | | | Trading | | Non-trading | | Total amount per income statement |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wholesale electricity purchase contracts | | | | | | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 3 | | | |
Wholesale electricity sales contracts | | | | | | | | (1) | | | (40) | | | |
Financial power contracts | | | | | | | | (2) | | | (21) | | | |
Financial and natural gas contracts | | | | | | | | (1) | | | (25) | | | |
Total gain (loss) included in operating revenues | | | | | | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | (83) | | | $ | 2,133 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchased power, natural gas and fuel used | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wholesale electricity purchase contracts | | | | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | 37 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial power contracts | | | | | | | | — | | | 1 | | | |
Financial and natural gas contracts | | | | | | | | — | | | 37 | | | |
Total gain included in purchased power, natural gas and fuel used | | | | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | 75 | | | $ | 741 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Gain (Loss) | | | | | | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | (8) | | | |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
The effect of derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships on accumulated OCI and income for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended March 31, | | Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (a) | | Location of Loss Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income | | Loss Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income | | Total amount per Income Statement |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | |
2023 | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate contracts | | $ | 90 | | | Interest Expense | | $ | — | | | $ | 95 | |
Commodity contracts | | 23 | | | Operating revenues | | 66 | | | $ | 2,466 | |
Total | | $ | 113 | | | | | $ | 66 | | | |
2022 | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate contracts | | $ | (56) | | | Interest Expense | | $ | — | | | $ | 71 | |
Commodity contracts | | (112) | | | Operating revenues | | 11 | | | $ | 2,133 | |
Total | | $ | (168) | | | | | $ | 11 | | | |
(a) Changes in OCI are reported on a pre-tax basis.
Amounts are reclassified from accumulated OCI into income in the period during which the transaction being hedged affects earnings or when it becomes probable that a forecasted transaction being hedged would not occur. Notwithstanding future changes in prices, approximately $99 million of losses included in accumulated OCI at March 31, 2023, are expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months. We did not record any net derivative losses related to discontinued cash flow hedges for both the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.
(c) Interest rate contracts
AVANGRID uses financial derivative instruments from time to time to alter its fixed and floating rate debt balances or to hedge fixed rates in anticipation of future fixed rate issuances.
As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the net loss in accumulated OCI related to previously settled interest rate contracts was $36 million and $38 million, respectively. For both the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, we amortized into income $2 million of the loss related to settled interest rate contracts. We will amortize approximately $7 million of the net loss on the interest rate contracts for the remainder of 2023.
The effect of derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships on accumulated OCI for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended March 31, | | (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (a) | | Location of Loss Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income | | Loss Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income | | Total amount per Income Statement |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | |
2023 | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate contracts | | $ | — | | | Interest expense | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 95 | |
| | | | | | | | |
2022 | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate contracts | | $ | — | | | Interest expense | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 71 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(a) Changes in OCI are reported on a pre-tax basis. The amounts in accumulated OCI are being reclassified into earnings over the underlying debt maturity periods which end in 2025 and 2029.
On July 15, 2021, Corporate entered into an interest rate swap to hedge the fair value of $750 million of existing debt included in "Non-current debt" on our consolidated balance sheets. The interest rate swap is designated and qualifies as a fair value hedge. The change in the fair value of the interest rate swap and the offsetting change in the fair value of the underlying debt are reported as components of "Interest expense."
The effects on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair value of hedge | | Location of Loss Recognized in Income Statement | | Loss Recognized in Income Statement | Year to date total per Income Statement |
(Millions) | | As of March 31, 2023 | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 | | |
Current Liabilities | | $ | (28) | | | Interest Expense | | $ | 7 | | | $ | 95 | |
Non-current liabilities | | $ | (67) | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Cumulative effect on hedged debt | | | | | | |
Current debt | | $ | 28 | | | | | | | |
Non-current debt | | $ | 67 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair value of hedge | | Location of (Gain) Recognized in Income Statement | | (Gain) Recognized in Income Statement | Year to date total per Income Statement |
(Millions) | | As of December 31, 2022 | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 | | |
Current Liabilities | | $ | (29) | | | Interest Expense | | $ | (2) | | | $ | 71 | |
Non-current liabilities | | $ | (86) | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Cumulative effect on hedged debt | | | | | | |
Current debt | | $ | 29 | | | | | | | |
Non-current debt | | $ | 86 | | | | | | | |
(d) Counterparty credit risk management
NYSEG and RG&E face risks related to counterparty performance on hedging contracts due to counterparty credit default. We have developed a matrix of unsecured credit thresholds that are applicable based on the respective counterparty’s or the counterparty guarantor’s credit rating, as provided by Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s. When our exposure to risk for a counterparty exceeds the unsecured credit threshold, the counterparty is required to post additional collateral or we will no longer transact with the counterparty until the exposure drops below the unsecured credit threshold.
The wholesale power supply agreements of UI contain default provisions that include required performance assurance, including certain collateral obligations, in the event that UI’s credit ratings on senior debt were to fall below investment grade. If such an event had occurred as of March 31, 2023, UI would have had to post an aggregate of approximately $40 million in collateral.
We have various master netting arrangements in the form of multiple contracts with various single counterparties that are subject to contractual agreements that provide for the net settlement of all contracts through a single payment. Those arrangements reduce our exposure to a counterparty in the event of a default on or termination of any single contract. For financial statement presentation purposes, we offset fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments and fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim or the obligation to return cash collateral arising from derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement. As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the amount of cash collateral under master netting arrangements that have not been offset against net derivative positions was $96 million and $97 million, respectively. Derivative instruments settlements and collateral payments are included throughout the “Changes in operating assets and liabilities” section of operating activities in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
Certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating on our debt from each of the major credit rating agencies. If our debt were to fall below investment grade, we would be in violation of those provisions and the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request immediate payment or demand immediate and ongoing full overnight collateralization on derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit risk related contingent features that are in a liability position as of March 31, 2023 was $50 million, for which we have posted collateral.
Note 8. Contingencies and Commitments
We are party to various legal disputes arising as part of our normal business activities. We assess our exposure to these matters and record estimated loss contingencies when a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. We do not provide for accrual of legal costs expected to be incurred in connection with a loss contingency.
Transmission - ROE Complaint – CMP and UI
On September 30, 2011, the Massachusetts Attorney General, DPU, PURA, New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission, Rhode Island Division of Public Utilities and Carriers, Vermont Department of Public Service, numerous New England consumer advocate agencies and transmission tariff customers collectively filed a joint complaint with the FERC, pursuant to sections 206 and 306 of the Federal Power Act: against several NETOs claiming that the approved base ROE of 11.14% used by NETOs in calculating formula rates for transmission service under the ISO-New England Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) was not just and reasonable and seeking a reduction of the base ROE with refunds to customers for the 15-month refund periods beginning October 1, 2011 (Complaint I), December 27, 2012 (Complaint II), July 31, 2014 (Complaint III) and April 29, 2016 (Complaint IV).
On October 16, 2014, the FERC issued its decision in Complaint I, setting the base ROE at 10.57% and a maximum total ROE of 11.74% (base plus incentive ROEs) for the October 2011 – December 2012 period as well as prospectively from October 16, 2014. On March 3, 2015, the FERC upheld its decision and further clarified that the 11.74% ROE cap will be applied on a project specific basis and not on a transmission owner’s total average transmission return. The complaints were consolidated and the administrative law judge issued an initial decision on March 22, 2016. The initial decision determined that, (1) for the fifteen month refund period in Complaint II, the base ROE should be 9.59% and that the ROE Cap (base ROE plus incentive ROEs) should be 10.42% and (2) for the fifteen month refund period in Complaint III and prospectively, the base ROE should be 10.90% and that the ROE Cap should be 12.19%. The initial decision in Complaints II and III is the administrative law judge’s recommendation to the FERC Commissioners.
CMP and UI reserved for refunds for Complaints I, II and III consistent with the FERC’s March 3, 2015 decision in Complaint I. Refunds were provided to customers for Complaint I. The CMP and UI total reserve associated with Complaints II and III is $28 million and $8 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2023, which has not changed since December 31, 2022, except for the accrual of carrying costs. If adopted as final by the FERC, the impact of the initial decision by the FERC administrative law judge would be an additional aggregate reserve for Complaints II and III of $17 million, which is based upon currently available information for these proceedings.
Following various intermediate hearings, orders and appellate decisions, on October 16, 2018, the FERC issued an order directing briefs and proposing a new methodology to calculate the NETOs ROE that is contained in NETOs’ transmission formula rate on file at the FERC (the October 2018 Order).
Pursuant to the October 2018 Order, the NETOs filed initial briefs on the proposed methodology in all four Complaints on January 11, 2019, and replied to the initial briefs on March 8, 2019.
On November 21, 2019, the FERC issued rulings on two complaints challenging the base return on equity for Midcontinent Independent System Operator, or MISO transmission owners. These rulings established a new zone of reasonableness based on equal weighting of the DCF and capital-asset pricing model for establishing the base return on equity. This resulted in a base return on equity of 9.88% as the midpoint of the zone of reasonableness. Various parties have requested rehearing on this decision, which was granted. On May 21, 2020, the FERC issued a ruling, which, among other things, adjusted the methodology to determine the MISO transmission owners ROE, resulting in an increase in ROE from 9.88% to 10.02% by utilizing the risk premium model, or RPM, in addition to the DCF model and CAPM under both prongs of Section 206 of the FPA, and calculated the zone of reasonableness into equal thirds rather than employing the quartile approach. Parties to these orders affecting the MISO transmission owners base ROE petitioned for their review at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in January 2021. The NETO’s submitted an amici curia brief in support of the MISO transmission owners’ on March 17, 2021. On August 9, 2022, the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the FERC’s orders and remanded the matter back to the FERC. The D.C. Circuit Court held that the FERC failed to offer a reasoned explanation for its decision to reintroduce the RPM after initially, and forcefully, rejecting it and that because the FERC adopted that significant portion of its model in an arbitrary and capricious fashion, the new ROE produced by that model cannot stand. We cannot predict the potential impact the MISO transmission owners' ROE proceeding may have in establishing a precedent for the NETO’s pending four Complaints.
On April 15, 2021, the FERC issued a supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Supplemental NOPR) that proposes to eliminate the 50 basis-point ROE incentive for utilities who join Regional Transmission Organizations after three years of membership. The NETOs submitted initial comments in opposition to the Supplemental NOPR on June 25, 2021 and reply
comments on July 26, 2021. If the elimination of the 50 basis-point ROE incentive adder becomes final, we estimate we would have an approximately $3 million reduction in earnings per year. We cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding.
California Energy Crisis Litigation
Two California agencies brought a complaint in 2001 against a long-term power purchase agreement entered into by Renewables, as seller, to the California Department of Water Resources, as purchaser, alleging that the terms and conditions of the power purchase agreement were unjust and unreasonable. The FERC dismissed Renewables from the proceedings; however, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the FERC's dismissal of Renewables from the proceeding.
Joining with two other parties, Renewables filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court on May 3, 2007. In an order entered on June 27, 2008, the Supreme Court granted Renewables’ petition for certiorari, vacated the appellate court's judgment, and remanded the case to the appellate court for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in a similar case. In light of the Supreme Court's order, on December 4, 2008, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated its prior opinion and remanded the complaint proceedings to the FERC for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's rulings. In 2014, the FERC assigned an administrative law judge to conduct evidentiary hearings. Following discovery, the FERC trial staff recommended that the complaint against Renewables be dismissed.
A hearing was held before a FERC administrative law judge in November and early December 2015. A preliminary proposed ruling by the administrative law judge was issued on April 12, 2016. The proposed ruling found no evidence that Renewables had engaged in any unlawful market conduct that would justify finding the Renewables power purchase agreements unjust and unreasonable. However, the proposed ruling did conclude that the price of the power purchase agreements imposed an excessive burden on customers in the amount of $259 million. Renewables position, as presented at hearings and agreed by the FERC trial staff, is that Renewables entered into bilateral power purchase contracts appropriately and complied with all applicable legal standards and requirements. The parties have submitted briefs on exceptions to the administrative law judge’s proposed ruling to the FERC. In April 2018, Renewables requested, based on the nearly two years of delay from the preliminary proposed ruling and the Supreme Court precedent, that the FERC issue a final decision expeditiously. On June 17, 2021, the FERC issued an Order Establishing Limited Remand remanding the case to the administrative law judge for additional detailed findings and legal analysis with respect to the impact of the conduct of one of the parties other than Renewables on their long-term contracts. The order did not address any of the other findings, including all of the findings with respect to Renewables, which remain pending. On July 9, 2021, Renewables filed a motion requesting that the FERC expeditiously issue a final decision with respect to the Renewables long-term contract rather than waiting for the administrative law judge’s ruling. On June 23, 2022, the administrative law judge issued additional findings and analysis to FERC with respect to the other party in the matter. These did not address any of the Renewables’ claims. The entire case has now been fully remanded to FERC. We cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding.
Customer Service Invoice Dispute
On May 4, 2021, a buyer under a virtual PPA with a subsidiary of Renewables provided notice that the buyer disagrees with the settlement amounts included in certain invoices. The PPA provides for a monthly settlement between the parties based on the metered output of the project based on a stated hub price. The disagreement relates as to the appropriate hub price to use for settlement calculations. The buyer has requested an adjustment to the invoices that would increase the amount payable by approximately $29 million. Renewables has responded in writing stating that the invoice was properly calculated in accordance with the provisions of the PPA. The parties participated in a mediation in March 2023. We cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Guarantee Commitments to Third Parties
As of March 31, 2023, we had approximately $693 million of standby letters of credit, surety bonds, guarantees and indemnifications outstanding. We also provided a guaranty related to Renewables' commitment to contribute equity to Vineyard Wind as described in Note 19, which is in addition to the amounts above. These instruments provide financial assurance to the business and trading partners of AVANGRID, its subsidiaries and equity method investees in their normal course of business. The instruments only represent liabilities if AVANGRID or its subsidiaries fail to deliver on contractual obligations. We therefore believe it is unlikely that any material liabilities associated with these instruments will be incurred and, accordingly, as of March 31, 2023, neither we nor our subsidiaries have any liabilities recorded for these instruments.
NECEC Commitments
On January 4, 2021, CMP transferred the New England Clean Energy Connect, or NECEC, project to NECEC Transmission LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Networks. Among other things, NECEC Transmission LLC and/or CMP committed to approximately $90 million of future payments to support various programs in the state of Maine, of which approximately
$9 million was paid through the end of 2021. In December 2021 the remaining future payments were suspended following the halt in construction of the NECEC project.
Note 9. Environmental Liabilities
Environmental laws, regulations and compliance programs may occasionally require changes in our operations and facilities and may increase the cost of electric and natural gas service. We do not provide for accruals of legal costs expected to be incurred in connection with loss contingencies.
Waste sites
The Environmental Protection Agency and various state environmental agencies, as appropriate, have notified us that we are among the potentially responsible parties that may be liable for costs incurred to remediate certain hazardous substances at twenty-four waste sites, which do not include sites where gas was manufactured in the past. Sixteen of the twenty-four sites are included in the New York State Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites; four sites are included in Maine’s Uncontrolled Sites Program; zero site is included in the Brownfield Cleanup Program and one site is included on the Massachusetts Non-Priority Confirmed Disposal Site list. The remaining sites are not included in any registry list. Finally, six of the twenty-four sites are also included on the National Priorities list. Any liability may be joint and several for certain sites.
We have recorded an estimated liability of $7 million related to seven of the twenty-four sites. We have paid remediation costs related to the remaining seventeen sites and do not expect to incur additional liabilities. Additionally, we have recorded an estimated liability of $9 million related to another twelve sites where we believe it is probable that we will incur remediation and/or monitoring costs, although we have not been notified that we are among the potentially responsible parties or that we are regulated under State Resource Conservation and Recovery Act programs. It is possible the ultimate cost to remediate these sites may be significantly more than the accrued amount. As of March 31, 2023, our estimate for costs to remediate these sites ranges from $14 million to $22 million. Factors affecting the estimated remediation amount include the remedial action plan selected, the extent of site contamination, and the allocation of the clean-up costs.
Manufactured Gas Plants
We have a program to investigate and perform necessary remediation at our fifty-three sites where gas was manufactured in the past (Manufactured Gas Plants, or MGPs). Six sites are included in the New York State Registry; thirty-nine sites are included in the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Multi-Site Order of Consent; two sites with individual NYSDEC Orders of Consent; one site under a Brownfield Cleanup Program and three sites are included in Maine Department of Environmental Protection programs (one each in the Voluntary Response Action Program, Brownfield Cleanup Program and Uncontrolled Sites Program). The remaining sites are not included in a formal program. We have entered into consent orders with various environmental agencies to investigate and, where necessary, remediate forty-one of the fifty-three sites.
As of March 31, 2023, our estimate for all costs related to investigation and remediation of the fifty-three sites ranges from $154 million to $255 million. Our estimate could change materially based on facts and circumstances derived from site investigations, changes in required remedial actions, changes in technology relating to remedial alternatives and changes to current laws and regulations.
Certain of our Connecticut and Massachusetts regulated gas companies own or have previously owned properties where MGPs had historically operated. MGP operations have led to contamination of soil and groundwater with petroleum hydrocarbons, benzene and metals, among other things, at these properties, the regulation and cleanup of which is regulated by the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act as well as other federal and state statutes and regulations. Each of the companies has or had an ownership interest in one or more such properties contaminated as a result of MGP-related activities. Under the existing regulations, the cleanup of such sites requires state and at times, federal, regulators’ involvement and approval before cleanup can commence. In certain cases, such contamination has been evaluated, characterized and remediated. In other cases, the sites have been evaluated and characterized, but not yet remediated. Finally, at some of these sites, the scope of the contamination has not yet been fully characterized; as of March 31, 2023, no liability was recorded related to these sites and no amount of loss, if any, can be reasonably estimated at this time. In the past, the companies have received approval for the recovery of MGP-related remediation expenses from customers through rates and will seek recovery in rates for ongoing MGP-related remediation expenses for all of their MGP sites.
As of both March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the liability associated with our MGP sites in Connecticut was $112 million, the remediation costs of which could be significant and will be subject to a review by PURA as to whether these costs are recoverable in rates.
As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, our total recorded liability to investigate and perform remediation at all known inactive MGP sites discussed above and other sites was $282 million and $289 million, respectively. We recorded a corresponding regulatory asset, net of insurance recoveries and the amount collected from FirstEnergy, as described below, because we expect to recover the net costs in rates. Our environmental liability accruals are recorded on an undiscounted basis and are expected to be paid through the year 2092.
FirstEnergy
NYSEG and RG&E each sued FirstEnergy under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act to recover environmental cleanup costs at certain former MGP sites, which are included in the discussion above. In 2011, the District Court issued a decision and order in NYSEG’s favor, which was upheld on appeal, requiring FirstEnergy to pay NYSEG for past and future clean-up costs at the sixteen sites in dispute. In 2008, the District Court issued a decision and order in RG&E's favor requiring FirstEnergy to pay RG&E for past and future clean-up costs at the two MGP sites in dispute. FirstEnergy remains liable for a substantial share of clean up expenses at the MGP sites. Based on projections as of March 31, 2023, FirstEnergy’s share of clean-up costs owed to NYSEG & RG&E is estimated at approximately $9 million and $7 million, respectively. These amounts are being treated as contingent assets and have not been recorded as either a receivable or a decrease to the environmental provision. Any recovery will be flowed through to NYSEG and RG&E customers, as applicable.
English Station
On April 8, 2013, DEEP issued an administrative order addressed to UI, Evergreen Power, LLC (Evergreen Power) and Asnat Realty LLC (Asnat), then owners of a former generation site on the Mill River in New Haven (English Station) that UI sold to Quinnipiac Energy in 2000, and others, ordering the parties to take certain actions related to investigating and remediating the English Station site. This proceeding was stayed while DEEP and UI continue to work through the remediation process pursuant to the consent order described below. Status reports are periodically filed with DEEP.
On August 4, 2016, DEEP issued a partial consent order (the consent order), that, subject to its terms and conditions, requires UI to investigate and remediate certain environmental conditions within the perimeter of the English Station site. Under the consent order, to the extent that the cost of this investigation and remediation is less than $30 million, UI will remit to the State of Connecticut the difference between such cost and $30 million to be used for a public purpose as determined in the discretion of the Governor of the State of Connecticut, the Attorney General of the State of Connecticut and the Commissioner of DEEP. UI is obligated to comply with the terms of the consent order even if the cost of such compliance exceeds $30 million. Under the terms of the consent order, the state will discuss options with UI on recovering or funding any cost above $30 million such as through public funding or recovery from third parties; however, it is not bound to agree to or support any means of recovery or funding. UI has continued its process to investigate and remediate the environmental conditions within the perimeter of the English Station site pursuant to the consent order. On April 18, 2023, DEEP issued a letter to UI requiring a response within 30 days that provides alternative remediation proposals to remediate certain environmental conditions and provides an accounting of costs incurred in connection compliance with the Consent Order.
As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the amount reserved related to English Station was $20 million and $19 million, respectively. Since inception, we have recorded $35 million to the reserve which has been offset with cash payments over time. We cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Note 10. Post-retirement and Similar Obligations
We made no pension contributions for the three months ended March 31, 2023. We do not expect to make any additional contributions in 2023.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for pension benefits for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Three Months Ended March 31, | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | 2023 | | 2022 | | | | | | | | |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | | | | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 8 | | | | | | | | | |
Interest cost | | | | | | 30 | | | 24 | | | | | | | | | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | | | | (36) | | | (45) | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Prior service costs | | | | | | — | | | 1 | | | | | | | | | |
Actuarial loss | | | | | | 1 | | | 18 | | | | | | | | | |
Curtailments and settlements | | | | | | — | | | 2 | | | | | | | | | |
Net Periodic Benefit Cost | | | | | | $ | (3) | | | $ | 8 | | | | | | | | | |
The components of net periodic benefit cost for postretirement benefits for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | | | | | 2023 | | 2022 |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
Interest cost | | | | | | 3 | | | 3 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | | | | (1) | | | (2) | |
Amortization of: | | | | | | | | |
Prior service costs | | | | | | — | | | — | |
Actuarial loss | | | | | | (3) | | | (1) | |
Net Periodic Benefit Cost | | | | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | 1 | |
Note 11. Equity
As of both March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we had 108,188 shares of common stock held in trust, respectively, and no convertible preferred shares outstanding. During the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, we issued 12,332 and 56,127 shares of common stock, respectively, each having a par value of $0.01, and released 0 shares of common stock held in trust.
We maintain a repurchase agreement with J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC. (JPM), pursuant to which JPM will, from time to time, acquire, on behalf of AVANGRID, shares of common stock of AVANGRID. The purpose of the stock repurchase program is to allow AVANGRID to maintain Iberdrola's relative ownership percentage of approximately 81.5%. The stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time upon notice. As of March 31, 2023, a total of 997,983 shares have been repurchased in the open market, all of which are included as AVANGRID treasury shares. The total cost of all repurchases, including commissions, was $47 million as of March 31, 2023.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, | | As of March 31, | | As of December 31, | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, | | As of March 31, | | |
| | 2022 | | | | 2023 | | 2023 | | 2021 | | | | 2022 | | 2022 | | |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gain for defined benefit plans, net of income tax expense of $0 for 2023 and $3 for 2022 | | | | | | $ | — | | | | | | | | | $ | 8 | | | | | |
Amortization of pension cost, net of income tax expense of $0 for 2023 and $0 for 2022 | | | | | | — | | | | | | | | | 1 | | | | | |
Net (loss) gain on pension plans | | (20) | | | | | — | | | (20) | | | (38) | | | | | 9 | | | (29) | | | |
Unrealized (loss) gain from equity method investment, net of income tax expense of $0 for 2023 and $5 for 2022 (a) | | 13 | | | | | (1) | | | 12 | | | (9) | | | | | 15 | | | 6 | | | |
Unrealized loss during period on derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges, net of income tax benefit of $(1) for 2023 and $(15) for 2022 | | (195) | | | | | (2) | | | (197) | | | (194) | | | | | (39) | | | (233) | | | |
Reclassification to net income of losses on cash flow hedges, net of income tax expense (benefit) of $18 for 2023 and $4 for 2022 (b) | | 22 | | | | | 52 | | | 74 | | | (32) | | | | | 11 | | | (21) | | | |
Loss (gain) on derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges | | (173) | | | | | 50 | | | (123) | | | (226) | | | | | (28) | | | (254) | | | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | $ | (180) | | | | | $ | 49 | | | $ | (131) | | | $ | (273) | | | | | $ | (4) | | | $ | (277) | | | |
(a) Foreign currency and interest rate contracts.
(b) Reclassification is reflected in the operating expenses and interest expense, net of capitalization line items in our consolidated statements of income.
Note 12. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to AVANGRID by the weighted-average number of shares of our common stock outstanding. During the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, while we did have securities that were dilutive, these securities did not result in a change in our earnings per share calculations.
The calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to AVANGRID, for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | | | | | 2023 | | 2022 |
(Millions, except for number of shares and per share data) | | | | | | | | |
Numerator: | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to AVANGRID | | | | | | $ | 245 | | | $ | 445 | |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic | | | | | | 386,744,996 | | | 386,698,132 | |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - diluted | | | | | | 387,077,213 | | | 387,114,285 | |
Earnings per share attributable to AVANGRID | | | | | | | | |
Earnings Per Common Share, Basic | | | | | | $ | 0.63 | | | $ | 1.15 | |
Earnings Per Common Share, Diluted | | | | | | $ | 0.63 | | | $ | 1.15 | |
Note 13. Segment Information
Our segment reporting structure uses our management reporting structure as its foundation to reflect how AVANGRID manages the business internally and is organized by type of business. We report our financial performance based on the following two reportable segments:
•Networks: includes all of the energy transmission and distribution activities, any other regulated activity originating in New York and Maine and regulated electric distribution, electric transmission and gas distribution activities originating in Connecticut and Massachusetts. The Networks reportable segment includes nine rate regulated operating segments. These operating segments generally offer the same services distributed in similar fashions, have the same types of customers, have similar long-term economic characteristics and are subject to similar regulatory requirements, allowing these operations to be aggregated into one reportable segment.
•Renewables: activities relating to renewable energy, mainly wind energy generation and trading related with such activities.
The chief operating decision maker evaluates segment performance based on segment adjusted net income defined as net income adjusted to exclude mark-to-market earnings from changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and costs incurred in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic.
Products and services are sold between reportable segments and affiliate companies at cost. Segment income, expense and assets presented in the accompanying tables include all intercompany transactions that are eliminated in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 4 - Revenue for more detailed information on revenue by segment.
Segment information as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2023, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 | | Networks | | Renewables | | Other (a) | | AVANGRID Consolidated |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | |
Revenue - external | | $ | 2,076 | | | $ | 390 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,466 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 174 | | | 105 | | | 1 | | | 280 | |
Operating income (loss) | | 277 | | | (10) | | | (2) | | | 265 | |
Earnings (losses) from equity method investments | | 4 | | | (2) | | | — | | | 2 | |
Interest expense, net of capitalization | | 70 | | | 6 | | | 19 | | | 95 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | 44 | | | (34) | | | (28) | | | (18) | |
Adjusted net income | | 195 | | | 51 | | | 1 | | | 248 | |
Capital expenditures | | 609 | | | 227 | | | — | | | 836 | |
As of March 31, 2023 | | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment | | 20,291 | | | 10,942 | | | 16 | | | 31,249 | |
Equity method investments | | 181 | | | 259 | | | — | | | 440 | |
Total assets | | $ | 28,591 | | | $ | 13,164 | | | $ | (297) | | | $ | 41,458 | |
(a) Includes Corporate and intersegment eliminations.
Segment information for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and as of December 31, 2022, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 | | Networks | | Renewables | | Other (a) | | AVANGRID Consolidated |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | |
Revenue - external | | $ | 1,935 | | | $ | 198 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,133 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 161 | | | 100 | | | — | | | 261 | |
Operating income (loss) | | 319 | | | (18) | | | 1 | | | 302 | |
Earnings from equity method investments | | 3 | | | 250 | | | — | | | 253 | |
Interest expense, net of capitalization | | 50 | | | 3 | | | 18 | | | 71 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | 31 | | | 41 | | | (4) | | | 68 | |
Adjusted net income (loss) | | 254 | | | 211 | | | (15) | | | 450 | |
Capital expenditures | | 355 | | | 454 | | | 2 | | | 811 | |
As of December 31, 2022 | | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment | | 20,027 | | | 10,950 | | | 17 | | | 30,994 | |
Equity method investments | | 171 | | | 266 | | | — | | | 437 | |
Total assets | | $ | 28,069 | | | $ | 13,553 | | | $ | (499) | | | $ | 41,123 | |
(a) Includes Corporate and intersegment eliminations.
Reconciliation of Adjusted Net Income to Net Income attributable to AVANGRID for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | | | | | 2023 | | 2022 |
(Millions) | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Avangrid, Inc. | | | | | | $ | 248 | | | $ | 450 | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | |
Mark-to-market earnings - Renewables (1) | | | | | | (4) | | | (3) | |
| | | | | | | | |
Impact of COVID-19 (2) | | | | | | — | | | (2) | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income tax impact of adjustments | | | | | | 1 | | | 2 | |
Net Income Attributable to Avangrid, Inc. | | | | | | $ | 245 | | | $ | 445 | |
(1)Mark-to-market earnings relates to earnings impacts from changes in the fair value of Renewables' derivative instruments associated with electricity and natural gas.
(2) Represents costs incurred in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, mainly related to bad debt provisions.
Note 14. Related Party Transactions
We engage in related party transactions that are generally billed at cost and in accordance with applicable state and federal commission regulations.
Related party transactions for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended March 31, | | 2023 | | 2022 |
(Millions) | | Sales To | | Purchases From | | Sales To | | Purchases From |
Iberdrola, S.A. | | $ | — | | | $ | (11) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (12) | |
Iberdrola Renovables Energía, S.L. | | $ | — | | | $ | (2) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (2) | |
Iberdrola Financiación, S.A. | | $ | — | | | $ | (4) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (3) | |
Vineyard Wind | | $ | 2 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1) | |
Related party balances as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of | | March 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
(Millions) | | Owed By | | Owed To | | Owed By | | Owed To |
Iberdrola, S.A. | | $ | — | | | $ | (11) | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | (29) | |
Iberdrola Financiación, S.A. | | $ | — | | | $ | (2) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (9) | |
Vineyard Wind | | $ | 2 | | | $ | (8) | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | (8) | |
Iberdrola Solutions | | $ | — | | | $ | (2) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (2) | |
Other | | $ | 3 | | | $ | (3) | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | (1) | |
Transactions with Iberdrola relate predominantly to the provision and allocation of corporate services and management fees. All costs that can be specifically allocated, to the extent possible, are charged directly to the company receiving such services. In situations when Iberdrola corporate services are provided to two or more companies of AVANGRID, any costs remaining after direct charges are allocated using agreed upon cost allocation methods designed to allocate such costs. We believe that the allocation method used is reasonable.
We have a bi-lateral demand note agreement with Iberdrola Solutions, LLC, which had notes payable balance of $2 million as both March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022.
There have been no guarantees provided or received for any related party receivables or payables. These balances are unsecured and are typically settled in cash. Interest is not charged on regular business transactions but is charged on outstanding loan balances. There have been no impairments or provisions made against any affiliated balances.
AVANGRID optimizes its liquidity position as part of the Iberdrola Group and is a party to a liquidity agreement with a financial institution, along with certain members of the Iberdrola Group. Cash surpluses remaining after meeting the liquidity requirements of AVANGRID and its subsidiaries may be deposited at the financial institution. Deposits, or credit balances,
serve as collateral against the debit balances of other parties to the liquidity agreement. The balance at both March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, was $0.
AVANGRID has a credit facility with Iberdrola Financiacion, S.A.U., a company of the Iberdrola Group. The facility has a limit of $500 million and matures on June 18, 2023. AVANGRID pays a facility fee of 10.5 basis points annually on the facility. As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, there was no outstanding amount under this credit facility.
See Note 19 - Equity Method Investments for more information on Vineyard Wind, LLC (Vineyard Wind).