Item 1. Business
Overview
Our mission is to provide universal access to world-class learning so that anyone, anywhere has the power to transform their life through learning. We believe in the power of learning as a source of human progress, transforming our world from illness to health, from poverty to prosperity, and from conflict to peace.
As a global platform, Coursera unites educators, learners, and institutions, serving approximately 168 million learners from over 230 countries and territories as of December 31, 2024. Our educator partners, which include 200 universities and 150 industry leaders, have created a diverse catalog of content and credentials, from entry-level industry microcredentials to university degrees. These are globally distributed through our platform, making high-quality, affordable education accessible around the globe.
Coursera serves learners with educational content and product experiences, such as interactive learning tools and personalized learning paths, directly through our global website, on the job through their employers, and through programs sponsored by colleges, universities, and government organizations. The graphic below illustrates our global adult online learning ecosystem as of December 31, 2024:

Technology is advancing faster than the world’s ability to adapt and acquire new skills. We believe that advancements in artificial intelligence (“AI”) and other emerging technologies will reshape how we live, learn, and work. We expect these changes will further increase the global skills gap. The rapid adoption of new technologies, tools, and processes creates an urgent need for organizations and learners to adapt to remain competitive. To seize the opportunities created by the digital economy, many aspiring and existing professionals need to learn, advance, and validate their skills in business, technology, AI, and data science. We believe education will continue to be furthered with blended classrooms powered by online learning, a focus on job-relevant skills, and lifelong learning to help people adapt and learn skills that can be used to gain employment, obtain new job opportunities, improve performance in their current jobs, or run their businesses.
We envision a future of higher education that emphasizes relevance, accessibility, and affordability, meeting the demands of a rapidly changing economy. We believe that online learning will become the primary means of meeting the global demand for emerging skills and that the adoption of online education, combined with the increased flexibility enabled by remote and hybrid workforces, holds the promise to increase global access.. Cross-sector collaboration is required between employers, government organizations, and universities in order to bridge the skills gap.
World-class teaching is the foundation of the Coursera experience. Coursera provides learners with high-quality, modular content and credentials at varying skill levels, price points, and durations. Product innovation like our AI-enabled Course Builder solution streamlines content production in various formats and allows customers to personalize courses tailored to their organization’s objectives. Additionally, our foreign language translation initiative has led to delivering our high-quality content in up to 24 languages. By leveraging Coursera’s global reach and scale supported by our platform, our educator partners can effectively tap into the worldwide demand for education, reaching individual learners, organizations, and institutions around the globe.
Reaching and serving a world of learners lies at the heart of our model. We strive to make it easy for learners to discover and engage with high-quality, job-relevant learning in flexible, hands-on online learning environments at affordable prices—including free offerings. Content and credentials from well-recognized educator partner brands helped us attract approximately 168 million learners cost effectively and build a global consumer audience. We use data-driven marketing to efficiently attract learners to a wide range of paid offerings, including standalone courses, multi-course specializations, industry certificate programs, and university degrees. We believe this efficient learner acquisition model has allowed us to build one of the largest global audiences of adult learners and serve these learners at various price points, with competitive margins for us and our educator partners.
We expect the long, episodic nature of higher education will break down into shorter, more relevant units of consumption designed to increase affordability and provide more immediate access to workforce participation. Our model lets learners leverage flexible and affordable career and learning pathways across our catalog, including “stacking” content and credentials to count as progress towards a broader program of study. Qualifying our high-quality learning catalog for credit recognition through organizations like the American Council on Education (“ACE”), the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (“ECTS”), and India’s National Skills Qualification Framework (“NSQF”) enables this. For example, eligible learners who complete the Google Data Analytics Certificate can earn a credit recommendation of up to 12 college credits, the equivalent of four college courses at the bachelor’s degree level in participating programs.
Coursera’s data and machine-learning systems drive personalized learning and skills benchmarking. We believe that our unified technology platform is not only making higher education more globally accessible and more effective, but is also enabling educators to author and distribute high-quality content efficiently through the use of our authoring tools and our Course Builder solution, employers to upskill and reskill their talent, and learners to start and advance their careers supported by a flexible learning environment. Further, our platform allows employers to tap into a global talent pool and provides them with insight into which learners have the requisite skills for specific job roles. It also allows learners to develop and showcase their skills with industry microcredentials and hands-on projects. For example, we added nearly 40 new entry-level Professional Certificates over the past year from partners like Adobe, Amazon, Google Cloud, Epic Games, IBM, and Microsoft. This expanded our ability to serve learners interested in a career as a cloud support associate, game designer, graphic designer, product manager, as well as many other job roles.
In addition to offering content and credentials directly to individuals at Coursera.org, we also sell directly to organizations and institutions, including employers, colleges and universities, and government entities and agencies. Employers can use Coursera for Business to help employees develop new skills in order to better acquire and serve customers, lower costs, reduce risk, and remain competitive in the new digital economy. Colleges and universities can use Coursera for Campus to deliver and integrate university and industry-branded online projects, courses, and credentials as they navigate a new era of financial challenges, pressure to deliver job-relevant skills and employable graduates, and evolving student preferences for hybrid and remote learning. Government entities and agencies can use Coursera for Government to train, reskill, and upskill employees and citizens into fast-growing digital roles that constitute a significant share of new job opportunities.
The global adult online learning ecosystem is large and growing. As we seek to reinforce our platform’s advantages and continue penetrating this market opportunity, we have multiple strategies to drive our growth. These include improving global conversion, upsell, and retention of paid consumer learners; improving retention of our Enterprise customers; increasing adoption and penetration of our Enterprise offerings; and deploying new in-demand product capabilities to our learners, institutional customers, and educator partners.
Our Opportunity: The Global Adult Online Learning Ecosystem is Large and Growing
As the pace of new knowledge and the skill demands of the global workforce continue to accelerate, we believe the global adult online learning ecosystem is poised to continue growing, through advancements in technology, flexibility, and accessibility.
We believe this presents a significant opportunity for Coursera. As a leading adult online education platform, we are well-positioned to cater to this growing demand. The key drivers of this growth, such as the need for upskilling and reskilling in the face of rapid technological advancements and the increasing importance of lifelong learning, align with our strengths, ecosystem, and offerings.
Our diverse catalog of courses and credentials, partnerships with leading universities and industry leaders, and advanced technology platform put us at the forefront of this expanding ecosystem. We envision a future where anyone, anywhere can access the education and skills they need to succeed in the digital economy. As such, we see this growth not only as an opportunity for Coursera to expand, but also to further our mission of transforming lives through learning.
Our Offerings to Individuals, Organizations, and Institutions
Our platform enables learners to discover content and credentials by domain (e.g., business, computer science, data science), by skill (e.g., leadership, Python programming, data visualization), and by job role (e.g., digital marketing specialist, cybersecurity engineer, data analyst). Once learners enroll in a course, our unified technology platform enables them to learn more effectively, test their knowledge, and earn credentials to signal career readiness.
Coursera’s learning experience includes:
•Courses with video-based lectures, quizzes, notes and highlights, readings, assessments, peer reviews, and group projects;
•AI-powered learning features, such as Coursera Coach (“Coach”) for pre-quiz practice questions and personalized, interactive instruction through text-based Coach dialogues, personalized discovery and recommendations that are job-aligned, and foreign language translations for up to 24 languages;
•Coursera Labs with hands-on projects that teach practical skills using real-world tools such as Python, Jupyter Notebooks, VS Code, R-Studio, and many other desktop and cloud-based applications accessible fully in-browser without software or data downloads;
•A mobile app that enables course downloads for offline learning, which is important for learners with limited or intermittent internet connectivity or power; and
•Localized experiences including homepage, payment options, pricing, local partnerships, and content discovery.
The full Coursera catalog includes*:
•2,000+ Guided Projects: Practice a technical skill or tool in less than two hours
•9,200+ Courses: Learn something new in 4 to 6 weeks
◦500+ Generative AI courses
•1,200+ Specializations: Advance a job-relevant skill in 3 to 6 months
•150+ Certificates
◦80+ Entry-level Professional Certificates: Earn a certification of job readiness in 3 to 9 months
◦30+ Non-entry level Professional Certificates: Earn a certification to advance your career in 1 to 10 months
◦30+ University Certificates: Earn a university-issued certification of field-level expertise in 4 to 24 months
◦15 MasterTrack Certificates: Earn a university-issued certification from a module of a university degree and credit that can be applied to that degree in the future in 3 to 12 months
•50+ Degrees: Earn a bachelor’s or master’s degree fully online or earn a postgraduate diploma
* As of December 31, 2024. The time periods noted are intended completion timeframes; actual time to completion varies by learner. Learners may also access certain courses, Specializations, and Professional Certificates through a Coursera Plus subscription.
Coursera.org for Individuals
Most learners come to Coursera to start, switch, or advance their careers, reach their educational goals, and enhance their lives. Learners consume educational content from our diversified portfolio, which is designed to meet a wide variety of goals and preferences. Our educator partners create thousands of courses, credentials, and other offerings across a wide range of domains, from a three-minute Clip on creating value with generative AI, to a two-hour Guided Project on how to build a website, to an entry-level business analyst Professional Certificate, to a Master of Data Science degree.
As technology automates more repetitive, predictable, lower-skilled job tasks, individuals around the world are looking to reskill or upskill with professional certificates and college degrees in order to move into emerging digital careers. Coursera offers a portfolio of entry-level Professional Certificates from IBM, Microsoft, Google, Meta, and more that help develop the skills needed to land entry-level digital jobs in high-demand domains such as cybersecurity, data science, healthcare, marketing, sales, and software engineering and development without requiring a college degree or any experience in the field. Coursera also offers fully online degrees in computer science, data science, and business.
Coursera Plus is our subscription offering that gives learners access to over 11,000 courses, Guided Projects, Specializations, and Professional Certificates on Coursera for a monthly or annual fee.
As of December 31, 2024, approximately 168 million learners had registered with Coursera to learn from more than 350 educator partners. Our partners have created thousands of catalog offerings, ranging from open courses to university degrees, attracting our large global Consumer audience as well as over 26,700 students enrolled in Degrees programs.
In 2024, learners logged approximately:
•49.5 million course enrollments, watched 585.2 million lectures, and completed 98.2 million assessments, each increasing 9% to 10% compared to 2023;
•3.3 million enrollments in generative AI courses, with the enrollment rate increasing from one enrollment per minute in 2023 to six enrollments per minute in 2024;
•4.9 million Guided Project enrollments, increasing 24%, compared to 2023; and
•4.9 million Professional Certificate enrollments, increasing 10%, compared to 2023.
Overall, learners are satisfied with their experiences on Coursera and with the outcomes our platform helps them achieve. Of learners who have rated a course in 2024, 81% gave their course a full 5-star rating.
Coursera for Enterprise
Coursera is available to organizations and institutions around the world, allowing businesses, academic institutions, and government organizations to enable their employees, students, and citizens to gain in-demand, job-aligned skills. Institutions play a significant role in addressing the global upskilling and reskilling challenge by providing awareness, incentives, and financial support for personal development and lifelong learning.
Coursera has designed a unified technology platform that allows us to configure a common set of content and features to meet the broad needs of our individual learners, as well as the Enterprise customers we serve through our Coursera for Business, Coursera for Campus, and Coursera for Government verticals. As of December 31, 2024, we had more than 1,600 Paid Enterprise Customers purchase Coursera through our direct sales force. We also have customers that purchase licenses through our channel partners or our Coursera for Teams offering.
The common content and features on our Enterprise learning platform include:
•A broad catalog of more than 12,300 courses, hands-on Guided Projects, and Professional Certificates, especially in the domains of business, computer science, technology, and data science;
•Course Builder, our proprietary generative AI-powered tool that acts like a personal instructional designer for educators and authors assisting with creating and improving course content, suggesting changes, and customizing and personalizing courses quickly and efficiently;
•Private Authoring, the ability for all Enterprise customers to author courses and projects that are specific to and accessible only by the learners in their institution or their citizens, as applicable;
•The ability to tailor custom course collections that surface curated collections of courses to specific learner populations;
•Academies and SkillSets that target skill proficiencies required for specific job roles and provide personalized learning paths to develop these skill proficiencies;
•Coursera Labs, with hands-on projects that teach practical skills using real-world tools such as Python, Jupyter Notebooks, VS Code, R-Studio, and many other desktop or cloud-based applications accessible fully in-browser without software or data downloads;
•Dashboards that enable administrators to deliver tailored learning programs to specific learner groups, measure and track progress in skills development, and benchmark learner skill proficiency;
•LevelSets that help learners calibrate targeted content recommendations to their skill level;
•Career Academy utilizes our entry-level Professional Certificates and Guided Projects to equip learners, regardless of prior education or work experience, with the skills and credentials for in-demand jobs;
•Generative AI Academy, designed to equip executives and their employees with foundational literacy and role-based skills training from top research universities and companies at the forefront of AI; and
•Academic integrity tools that enhance the credibility and recognition of online learning and are especially relevant to academic institutions that allow students to earn credit towards their university degree by taking online courses.
Coursera for Business serves private-sector employers interested in upskilling and reskilling their human capital, companies that want to offer Coursera as a benefit to their customers, and reseller partners. Our customer base ranges from small teams seeking specific training to large, multinational corporations aiming to drive organizational change through comprehensive workforce upskilling and reskilling. Our engagement approach is tiered to suit the size, relationship, and opportunity associated with each customer. Smaller teams can swiftly gain access to Coursera, with purchases made directly on our site, through our Coursera for Teams offering. For larger teams or customers with specialized needs, we provide support to ensure a tailored and effective learning solution.
Coursera for Campus serves academic institutions interested in offering job-relevant, credit-eligible, high-quality online education to students, faculty, and staff. Our offerings provide colleges and universities with university-branded, online learning that also includes top-branded industry content, courses, and credentials to meet students’ growing demand for hybrid and remote learning options and employers’ demands for job-ready graduates. Our Career Academy offering provides more than 65 industry microcredentials alongside the core university curriculum. More recently, growth in our catalog of entry-level Professional Certificates, in combination with regional credit recommendations in the United States, European Union, and India, has enabled academic institutions to offer career electives to students for credit.
Coursera for Government serves all levels of government organizations with a primary focus on developing and empowering the next generation of public sector leaders through skill development programs. We also serve government organizations that are interested in delivering workforce skilling, upskilling, and reskilling for in-demand jobs.
Our Competitive Strengths: The Power of Our Business Model
We believe that our competitive advantage is based on the following key strengths:
Trusted brand with a large learner base. Coursera’s reputation as a trusted platform for online education has attracted approximately 168 million registered learners, making it one of the largest global audiences of adult learners in the world. This large, growing learner base attracts leading educator partners, creates Enterprise and Degrees leads, provides data and insights, increases operating scale, improves search engine optimization performance, and produces favorable economics.
Our consumer flywheel creates a price-to-cost advantage. We make it easy for learners to come to Coursera and explore learning options through free open courses and projects. We believe this efficient acquisition model, powered by free, high-quality content, global partner brands, expertise in search engine optimization, strong word-of-mouth referrals, public relations, and effective paid marketing, enables us to attract learners to Coursera at scale and connect them with the right learning experiences over the course of their academic and professional lives.
Branded catalog of modular content and credentials. Our broad catalog and flexible technology platform provide multiple entry points for learners, allowing us to meet their educational and career goals, regardless of their starting point. We believe we are the only platform with the ability to blend industry microcredentials with traditional academic degree credentials at scale. Many of our credentials have ACE, ECTS, and NSQF credit recommendations, which allow learners to more easily discover content and credentials that are eligible to receive college credit, while enabling academic institutions globally to integrate job-relevant, industry content into a local or online degree program.
Network of leading educator partners. Our large, global learner base attracts trusted and recognized educator partners, enabling us to offer a diverse range of courses and credentials. We carefully select our educator partners, prioritizing quality, subject expertise, and geographic appeal. As technology advances and new relevant skill sets emerge, our growing industry partner relationships allow us to be responsive in providing in-demand skills for aspiring and ascending professionals.
Job-relevant, hands-on projects, and industry certificates. In order to compete and keep pace with the rapidly changing skills landscape, learners need to be able to quickly identify and learn practical skills using job-relevant tools. Our platform offers one- to two-hour Guided Projects that teach the latest in-demand skills and industry tools with a hands-on learning experience. We also offer a broad selection of Professional Certificates in various languages that cover a wide range of roles, careers, and industries, many of which are authored by a growing list of well-known employer brands such as Amazon, Google, IBM, Meta, and Microsoft.
Multi-channel Enterprise model. With a single content catalog and a unified technology and data platform, we are able to distribute content and credentials to a global audience of businesses, academic institutions, and government organizations. Our technology also enables collaboration among institutional networks, so that businesses, academic institutions, and government organizations can collaborate on Coursera by sharing content, program settings, licenses, and data insights.
Rich data analytics and skills graphs. Our platform captures a significant amount of data across millions of enrollments related to teaching, learning, content, and skills development. This data allows us to personalize learning experiences, map skills to content and jobs, and personalize marketing communications to keep learners engaged.
Competition
The ecosystem for global adult online learning is highly fragmented and rapidly evolving. We expect alternative modes of learning to continue to accelerate as existing players and new entrants in the industry introduce new and more competitive products, enhancements, and bundles. Participants in the global adult online learning ecosystem include, but are not limited to: 2U, Inc., including through its subsidiary edX Inc.; Alison (Capernaum Limited); DataCamp, Inc.; Degreed, Inc.; Eruditus Learning Solutions Pte. Ltd.; Global University Systems, operating the platform FutureLearn; Go1 Pty Limited; Google LLC through its YouTube services; Great Learning PTE Ltd.; Khan Academy, Inc.; LinkedIn Corporation through its LinkedIn Learning services; MasterClass; Noodle Partners, Inc.; OpenSesame Inc.; Pluralsight, Inc.; Risepoint (formerly known as Academic Partnerships); Simplilearn; Skillshare, Inc.; Skillsoft Corp.; Udacity, Inc.; Udemy, Inc.; upGrad Education Private Limited; The Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.; and internal online degree platforms developed in-house by universities.
Our Growth Strategy
While our revenue growth has seen a deceleration in the past year, we have significantly improved our operating leverage and cash flows. The combination of greater global access to technology and our open learning platform is helping to unlock educational and economic opportunities for more global citizens by enhancing their education and providing them with credentials that help start, switch, or advance their careers. We continue to believe that we have a large, underpenetrated addressable opportunity ahead of us to enable the digital transformation of higher education and provide adult lifelong learning at scale.
Key elements of our strategy to drive growth in our business include:
Improve conversion, upsell, and retention of paid Consumer learners. Our Consumer platform fosters a natural learning progression, where learners can transition from free projects or courses to fully online degrees. A key tool in this strategy is our subscription offering, Coursera Plus, which has improved our ability to convert and retain paid Consumer learners. In 2024, over 65% of our cash receipts from Consumer offerings came from individual learners who were registered on our platform as of December 31, 2023.
Continue to grow our learner base and build our brand. We intend to continue to invest in increasing the number of registered learners on Coursera and increasing awareness of the Coursera brand. Our large learner base and brand work synergistically, increasing our value to educator partners. This provides an incentive for them to author additional content and credentials, further enriching our offerings. This broader catalog, in turn, enhances the appeal of Coursera to learners, which grows our consumer learner base. We believe the content and credentials from our educator partners generate meaningful organic and unpaid traffic to Coursera, which reduces our cost of learner acquisition. A growing learner base also generates synergistic opportunities for other parts of our business, as some learners will go on to enroll in Degrees programs or provide us with Enterprise leads.
Continue to grow our Enterprise business. Coursera’s growth is driven in part by expansion into new logos as well as broader penetration of learners within our existing base of business, academic, and government customers. Our team identifies and engages with potential Enterprise customers, primarily through direct outreach. Once our platform has been chosen and implemented, we focus on expanding and growing our relationships with existing customers. Our relationships often begin with departmental deployments, evolving to multi-department and ultimately organization-wide utilization as our value is proven within our customers’ learner bases.
Grow our content and credentials catalog and network of educator partners. We plan to continue to invest in growing our catalog of projects, courses, Specializations, and certificates across a broad range of topics, domains, and job roles, and expand our network of educator partners.
Continue global expansion. Approximately 47% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 came from learners outside of the U.S. We plan to continue to market our offerings and programs to individual learners, businesses, academic institutions, and government organizations globally, providing us broad access to the addressable market while also building on our global brand as a leading learning destination. We also continue to enhance the local learning experience, including language translations, localized discovery, geographical pricing, payment methods, and regional credit recommendations.
Sales and Marketing
Our sales and marketing efforts are focused on building a unified marketing system that connects individuals to lifelong learning opportunities throughout their academic and professional lives. Our strategy centers on leveraging the Coursera brand and our partners’ brands along with our large catalog of high-quality, freemium content to attract learners to Coursera efficiently. Learners come to Coursera primarily through free or low-cost acquisition channels such as public relations, word of mouth, and natural search. We also attract learners through paid advertising channels including an affiliate publisher network and paid search.
Once attracted to our platform, we present learners with a broad selection of courses, certificates, and degree programs, which help us serve the diverse needs of working adults, including beginner, intermediate, and advanced job roles. We believe that pathways between our open content and credentials, particularly our entry-level Professional Certificates and degrees, could provide a more accessible and affordable method for learners looking to progress in their education and careers. This approach allows us to market categories of certificate and degree programs to learners earlier in their consideration process, connecting them with targeted learning opportunities based on their background, skill level, and career goals.
Additionally, the data from our Consumer learner base enhances the efficiency of our Enterprise marketing. Related insights, especially those regarding a company’s skill proficiencies compared to the competition, are derived from the aggregated learning behaviors of Consumer learners working at a given company. This valuable information enables us to approach prospects with targeted skill development solutions.
Utilizing these insights, our global Enterprise sales team identifies and engages with potential organizational and institutional customers around the world. With our distributed team, we have deployed a regional approach to sales and account management with a focus on growing and upselling Enterprise accounts. Organizations that require a smaller number of licenses and prefer a self-serve approach can purchase our Coursera for Teams offering directly from our site.
Research and Development
Our research and development team creates and maintains our platform, products, and insights to deliver a high-quality learning experience to our learners and customers cost-effectively and at scale. We leverage our large partner and customer base, our engaged learner community, and our focus on user-driven innovation to aggregate feedback on features and functionality and consistently improve our offerings and platform, including the authoring experience for our educator partners. Our production environment runs in a cloud environment, providing scalable storage and elastic computing.
We invest substantial resources in research and development to drive our technology innovation and bring new offerings and features to the market. Our research and development team is responsible for the design, development, and testing of features and offerings on our platform. They are also responsible for building and integrating tools and systems to help our services function deliver high-quality service at lower cost as we scale.
Our research and development teams are primarily concentrated in the U.S., Canada, and India. We believe our research and development teams are diverse, bringing unique and essential perspectives to our platform.
Intellectual Property
We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures, contractual commitments and other legal rights and practices to protect our intellectual property, including our brand, proprietary information, technologies, processes, and the algorithms we use throughout our business. For example, as of December 31, 2024, we had 21 issued patents and one allowed patent relating to technology features of our platform, including identity verification, content delivery and navigation, and automation, which patents expire between 2034 and 2041, and several U.S. pending patent applications also relating to certain technology features of our platform. Our principal trademark assets include the registered trademark “Coursera” and our logos and taglines. We also hold the rights to the “Coursera.org” internet domain name and various related domain names, which are subject to internet regulatory bodies and trademark and other related laws of each applicable jurisdiction. For important additional information related to our intellectual property position, please review the information set forth in “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Intellectual Property.”
Seasonality
We experience revenue fluctuations due to seasonal engagement patterns of individual learners and Enterprise customers, which may vary from quarter to quarter or year to year, and seasonal operating practices or engagement patterns of partners resulting from academic calendars or fiscal years that may differ from our own.
Historically, there has been an increase in enrollments from new and existing consumer learners in the first and fourth quarter of each year as the result of various holiday promotions offered during these periods. Additionally, revenue from consumer learners varies quarter-over-quarter due to the timing of our launches of new course content, offerings, and features. Revenue from Enterprise customers also varies quarter-over-quarter due to budgetary cycles and other macroeconomic factors.
The Degrees student count is affected by the seasonality of the school class cycles, combined with the underlying growth interacting with those trends. For quarter-over-quarter fluctuations, the number of Degrees students fluctuates in part because the academic terms for each degree program often begin and/or end within different calendar quarters, and the frequency with which each degree program is offered within a given year varies.
Human Capital
Overview
At Coursera, we are committed to providing employee services and workplace experiences that empower our global workforce to perform at their best and foster a shared sense of purpose. These efforts facilitate optimal performance and amplify our mission to transform lives through learning. As of December 31, 2024, we had 1,260 full-time employees. We also engage contractors and consultants for auxiliary services and support.
Our focus on building a great place to work has resulted in a strong culture that values innovation and results at scale. Our employees take pride in working at Coursera and in the positive social impact we can make together. To further enable our ability to grow, create value, and fulfill our public benefit objectives, we continue to invest in attracting, retaining, and developing team members to better serve the broad set of stakeholders we serve.
Talent Management
Coursera’s mission of transforming lives through learning sits at the core of our business objectives, and we seek to attract, hire, and develop distributed teams of talent that can represent our global community of learners, customers, and educator partners. We do this through embracing a remote work strategy to attract and retain top global talent, while strengthening a culture of innovation, performance, and engagement.
We are committed to fostering a culture of continuous learning within our own organization, just as we do for the millions of learners who use our platform. We offer learning programs and tools to support our employees’ personal and professional development. Our internal learning and skills development program gives employees access to a wide range of courses, Specializations, and certificates on the Coursera platform. This encourages the advancement of job-relevant skills, career progression, and rapid innovation in support of our strategic objectives. Employees can also choose to go deeper: for employees who are accepted into select degree programs on Coursera, we offer scholarships that cover 100% of tuition and fees.
Employee Engagement
At Coursera, we believe in the power of feedback and the importance of an engaged workforce to drive our mission forward. For more than a decade, we have measured employee engagement and tracked employees’ perspectives on important issues through our employee engagement surveys. These voluntary surveys serve as an essential tool to provide important insight into organizational health and allow us to address opportunities for improvement in more focused and meaningful ways.
We further enrich this feedback process through our Customer Zero program, which provides employees with early access to our new courses, capabilities, and platform enhancements. This not only aids their personal development but also creates an essential feedback loop, aligning our product innovation efforts with the firsthand experiences of our team.
We envision Coursera as a place where employees are inspired and encouraged to reach their full potential. By valuing and acting on employee feedback, and investing in their continuous development, we aim to maximize their potential, broaden their contribution to our mission, and enhance the value they deliver to the learning communities we serve.
Total Rewards
We are committed to providing competitive and equitable compensation that reflects market standards and rewards performance. Our compensation practices are regularly benchmarked to ensure market competitiveness, with a strong emphasis in performance alignment. To reinforce this, we have established a structured cadence for formal performance reviews, which complement Coursera’s culture of continuous, open, and constructive feedback.
Furthermore, our compensation philosophy is designed to promote fair and equitable pay for all employees regardless of gender, identity, race, age, or other protected characteristics. We routinely review our pay structures to identify potential disparities while continuously seeking opportunities to enhance our pay practices.
Beyond compensation, our workforce strategies prioritize employee well-being. We offer wellness programs, a global well-being reimbursement program, stipends for home office essentials, and access to co-working spaces worldwide. We also host various events to build connections, promote collaboration, and enhance team performance.
Regulatory Matters
As a public company with global operations, we are subject to various federal, state, local, and foreign laws, rules, and regulations. Compliance with these laws, rules, and regulations has not had a material effect on our capital expenditures, results of operations, and competitive position as compared to prior periods. Nevertheless, compliance with existing or future governmental regulations, including, but not limited to, those related to higher education, consumer and data protection, intellectual property, government contracting, global trade, business acquisitions, antitrust, employment, anti-corruption, accounting standards, corporate governance, tax, and AI ethics and machine learning, could have a material impact on our business in future periods.
Higher Education Regulations
As a service provider to higher education institutions both in the U.S. and internationally, either directly or indirectly through our arrangements with partners, we are required to comply with various education laws and regulations.
Higher education is heavily regulated in the U.S. and most international jurisdictions, and our university partners are subject to extensive legislation, regulation, and oversight. The regulations, standards, and policies they are governed by and must adhere to are complex, change frequently, and are often subject to differing interpretations and can be implemented with little to no interpretative guidance. These changes could compromise our university partners’ accreditation, authorization to offer online learning in various states or countries, permissible activities, or access to U.S. federal funds under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (respectively, “Title IV” and “HEA”).
At times, our university partners are subject to regulations that were designed to address in-person, correspondence or other types of learning experiences not offered online and may be difficult to interpret or apply to the types of programs they offer on our platform. Degrees or certifications earned through an institution in one jurisdiction may not be recognized as valid or sufficient in other jurisdictions, including internationally, for employment, to satisfy prerequisites for advanced degrees, or other opportunities. Additionally, numerous U.S. states require education providers to be licensed or authorized in such a state simply to enroll persons located in that state into an online education program or to conduct related activities, such as marketing.
The vast majority of our U.S.-based university partners participate in the federal student financial assistance programs under Title IV, and are subject to extensive regulation by the U.S. Department of Education (“DOE”), as well as various state agencies, licensing boards, and accrediting agencies. To participate in Title IV programs, an institution must receive and maintain authorization by the appropriate state education agencies, be accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the DOE, and be certified by the DOE as an eligible institution. The increased scrutiny and results-based accountability initiatives in the education sector, as well as ongoing policy differences in the U.S. Congress (“Congress”) regarding spending levels, could lead to significant changes in connection with the upcoming reauthorization of the HEA or otherwise. These changes may place additional regulatory burdens on postsecondary schools participating in Title IV programs generally, and specific changes may be targeted at companies such as ours that serve higher education within the U.S. Regulatory activities and initiatives of the DOE may have similar consequences for our business even in the absence of congressional action.
Authorization and Approval
Our U.S.-based university partners are required to obtain the appropriate approvals from the DOE and applicable state and accrediting regulatory agencies for new programs. Similar approvals and reviews may be required for programs from our educator partners based outside of the U.S. and for our partners to offer programs in other countries.
Our educator partners, both U.S. and international, may also be required to be authorized in certain states to offer online programs, engage in advertising or recruiting, and operate externships, internships, technical training, or other forms of field experience, depending on state or international law. Although many of our programs are offered by U.S.-based higher education institutions that hold such authorizations or participate in an appropriate state reciprocity agreement such as the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (“SARA”), other educator partners are not traditional education institutions or operate outside of the U.S. and do not hold such state authorizations. Some institutions, including California higher education institutions, currently do not participate in SARA.
Certain foreign local education laws and regulations require us, or our educator partners, to obtain appropriate approvals. For example, Indian regulations relating to online higher education require, among other things, that learning platforms utilized by Indian universities to offer online degrees be approved by a technical committee of the Indian regulator.
Accreditation
Accrediting agencies primarily examine the academic quality of the instructional programs of an educational institution, and a grant of accreditation is typically viewed as confirmation that an institution or an institution’s programs meet generally accepted academic standards. Accrediting agencies also review the administrative and financial operations of the institutions they accredit to ensure that each institution has the resources to perform its educational mission. The DOE also relies on accrediting agencies to determine whether institutions qualify to participate in Title IV programs.
Although we are not an accredited institution and are not required to maintain accreditation, accrediting agencies are responsible for reviewing an accredited institution’s third-party contracts with service providers like us and may require that an institution obtain approval from, or notify the accreditor in connection with, such arrangements. We work closely with our university partners, which are accredited institutions, to assure that the applicable standards of their respective accreditors are met.
DOE “Dear Colleague” Letter (“DCL”)
Each institution that participates in Title IV programs agrees, as a condition of its eligibility to participate in those programs, that it will not “provide any commission, bonus, or other incentive payment based directly or indirectly on success in securing enrollments or financial aid to any persons or entities engaged in any student recruiting or admission activities or in making decisions regarding the award of student financial assistance.” The vast majority of our U.S.-based university partners participate in the Title IV programs. Although this rule, referred to as the incentive compensation rule, generally prohibits entities or individuals from receiving incentive-based compensation payments for the successful recruitment, admission, or enrollment of learners, the DOE provided clarifying guidance in March 2011 interpreting the incentive compensation rule as permitting tuition revenue-sharing arrangements known as the “bundled services exception.” Our current degrees business model relies heavily on the bundled services exception to enter into tuition revenue-sharing agreements with our U.S.-based university partners.
The DCL issued by the DOE on March 17, 2011 sets forth the guidance of the DOE regarding various regulations that were implemented around that time. The DCL affirms that “[t]he Department generally views payment based on the amount of tuition generated as an indirect payment of incentive compensation based on success in recruitment and therefore a prohibited basis upon which to measure the value of the services provided.” The DCL, however, in Example 2-B, clarified an important exception to this prohibition for a business model that complies with the bundled services exception: “A third party that is not affiliated with the institution it serves and is not affiliated with any other institution that provides educational services, which third party provides bundled services to the institution including marketing, enrollment application assistance, recruitment services, course support for online delivery of courses, the provision of technology, placement services for internships, or student career counseling, may receive from an institution an amount based on tuition generated for the institution by the third-party’s activities for all bundled services that are offered and provided collectively, as long as the third party does not make prohibited compensation payments to its employees, and the institution does not pay the third party separately for student recruitment services provided by the entity.”
The DCL guidance indicates that an arrangement that complies with Example 2-B will be deemed to be in compliance with the incentive compensation provisions of the HEA and the DOE’s regulations. Our business model and contractual arrangements with our U.S.-based university partners are designed to follow Example 2-B in the DCL. However, the inherent ambiguity in the DCL and the incentive compensation rule creates the risk that DOE or a court, including, notably, in the context of a “whistleblower” claim under the federal False Claims Act, could disagree with that interpretation. If the DOE or a court determined that our business model or even the practices of a subcontractor did not meet the bundled services exception, we could have contractual obligations to our U.S.-based partners such as indemnifying a partner from private claims, government investigations, or demands for repayment of Title IV program funds.
Further, because the bundled services rule was promulgated by agency guidance through the DCL and is not codified by statute or regulation, there is risk that the exception could be altered or removed without prior notice, public comment period, or other administrative procedural requirements that accompany formal agency rulemaking. For example, the DOE recently issued new guidance expanding the application of third-party servicer requirements, including an annual audit requirement, to any entity providing recruitment services or content. The DCL has been criticized by commentators and lawmakers, including in a June 2022 report by the U.S. House Committee on Appropriations, which urged the DOE to rescind the guidance, and in a recent commentary authored by Representative DeLauro, the ranking member of the House Appropriations Committee and the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Subcommittee. On February 15, 2023, the DOE announced that it is reviewing its DCL guidance on incentive compensation compliance. The DOE has not announced the results of this review. In addition, the legal weight the DCL would carry in litigation over the propriety of any specific compensation arrangements under the HEA or the incentive compensation rule is uncertain. We can offer no assurances as to whether the exception in the DCL would be upheld by a court or how it would be interpreted.
Additionally, in the absence of further DOE guidance, certain states may enact laws prohibiting their public universities from entering into revenue share arrangements to procure marketing and recruiting services in support of their online programs, such as a July 1, 2024 Minnesota law. The Minnesota law also mandates institutional approval for OPM contracts, sets strict reporting and marketing guidelines, and includes a temporary exemption for certain contracts modified before July 1, 2023. In the past, other states, such as California, Florida, and New Jersey, have considered similar legislation to Minnesota, but none have been enacted to date.
Misrepresentation Rule
Under our contracts with U.S.-based university partners, we are required to comply with other regulations promulgated by the DOE and comparable state laws that affect our marketing activities, including the misrepresentation rule. The misrepresentation rule is broad in scope and applies to statements our employees or agents may make about the nature of an educator partner’s program, their financial charges, or the employability of their program graduates. As the DOE confirmed in a “Dear Colleague” Letter issued on January 16, 2025, universities may be responsible for misrepresentations made by their third party service providers.
Specifically, the HEA prohibits an institution that participates in the Title IV programs from engaging in any “substantial misrepresentation” regarding three broad subject areas: (1) the nature of the school’s education programs, (2) the school’s financial charges, and (3) the employability of the school’s graduates. In 2010, as part of the program integrity rules, the DOE revised its regulations in order to significantly expand the scope of the misrepresentation rule. Although some of the DOE’s most expansive amendments to the misrepresentation rule were overturned by the courts in 2012, most of the 2010 amendments survived and remain in effect.
Violations of the misrepresentation rule are subject to various sanctions by the DOE and violations may be used as a basis for legal action by third parties. Similar rules apply under state laws or are incorporated in institutional accreditation standards and the Federal Trade Commission applies similar rules prohibiting any unfair or deceptive marketing practices to the education sector.
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (“FERPA”)
We are required to comply with FERPA, which generally prohibits an institution of higher education from disclosing personally identifiable information (“PII”) from a learner’s education records without the learner’s consent. Our U.S.-based university degree and certificate partners and Coursera for Campus customers and their learners disclose to us certain information that originates from or composes a learner education record under FERPA. Through our contracts to provide services to institutions, we are indirectly subject to FERPA, and we may not transfer or otherwise disclose any PII from a learner record to another party other than in a manner permitted under the statute and any applicable contract. In the event that we disclose learner information in violation of FERPA, the DOE could require a partner to suspend our access to their learner information for at least five years.
For additional discussion of regulatory risks, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Regulatory Matters and Litigation.”
Public Benefit Corporation (“PBC”) Status
On February 1, 2021, we amended our certificate of incorporation to become a Delaware PBC. We believe being a PBC reinforces our commitment to providing global access to affordable and flexible world-class learning and strengthens our mission, culture, and opportunities to create long-term value for stockholders and other stakeholders.
PBCs are intended to produce a public benefit and to operate in a responsible and sustainable manner. Under Delaware law, PBCs are required to identify in their certificate of incorporation the public benefit they will promote. Additionally, their directors have a duty to manage the affairs of the corporation in a manner that balances the pecuniary interests of the stockholders, the best interests of those materially affected by the corporation’s conduct, and the specific public benefit identified in the certificate of incorporation. They are also required to publicly disclose a report that assesses their public benefit performance at least every two years.
Our public benefit purpose, as stated in our certificate of incorporation, is “to provide global access to flexible and affordable high-quality education that supports personal development, career advancement, and economic opportunity.” We believe that our status as a PBC underscores our commitment to our mission and attracts talented, motivated employees who want to make a positive impact on learners around the world. We also believe it opens avenues for partnerships with like-minded educators and appeals to customers who align with our trusted brand.
Available Information
Our website is located at www.coursera.org, and our investor relations website is located at investor.coursera.com. The reports we file with or furnish to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available, free of charge, on our investor relations website at investor.coursera.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. These reports and filings can also be accessed at www.sec.gov.
We disclose material information to the public through a variety of means, including SEC filings, press releases, company blog posts, public conference calls and webcasts, and our investor relations website. We use these channels to communicate with investors and the public about Coursera, our products and services, and other matters. Therefore, we encourage investors, the media and others interested in Coursera to review the information we make public in these locations, as this information may be deemed material.
Further, corporate governance information, including our corporate governance guidelines, code of business conduct and ethics, and committee charters, is also available on our investor relations website.
The content of, or information accessible through, our websites are not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K or in any other report or document we file with the SEC. Any references to our websites are intended to be inactive textual references only.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risk Factors Summary
Our business is subject to numerous risks, as more fully described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. In particular, risks associated with our business include, among others, the following, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or prospects:
•our historical growth may not be indicative of our future growth;
•fluctuations in our quarterly and annual revenue and operating results could cause our stock price to fluctuate and the value of your investment to decline;
•the evolution of our offerings coupled with our limited operating history makes it difficult to predict our future financial and operating results;
•the nascency and market adoption of online learning solutions and generative AI, which may not grow or evolve as we expect, or lead to increased demand for our offerings;
•changes in contractual terms with our educator partners, including with respect to pricing or contract length;
•our ability to maintain and expand our partnerships with our educator partners;
•our ability to attract and retain learners, including converting freemium learners to paid learners;
•our ability to manage the growth of our business both in terms of scale and complexity;
•changes in our contract terms, including our pricing models, for our offerings;
•our ability to successfully expand our international operations, including growing our worldwide educator partner and learner base, and to manage the risks presented by such operations;
•our ability to launch new offerings and services to learners to grow our business;
•our ability to achieve or maintain profitability in the future;
•our ability to improve operational efficiencies and operating costs, including through restructuring and expense reduction initiatives;
•our ability to attract and retain key personnel and manage leadership transitions;
•our ability to generate sufficient revenue from new offerings to offset our costs of the offerings;
•our ability to compete effectively;
•the impact of potential changes in laws and regulations applicable to us, our educator partners, learners, and customers, including changes to government spending policies or budget priorities that impact our business;
•our, and our educator partners’, ability to comply with international, federal, and state education laws and regulations, including applicable state authorizations for their programs;
•our educator partners’ ability to obtain timely approval from applicable regulatory agencies to offer new programs, make substantive changes to existing programs, or expand programs into or within certain jurisdictions;
•any changes to the validation or applicability of the United States (“U.S.”) Department of Education “Dear Colleague” Letter (“DCL”), on which our Degrees business model relies;
•our educator partners’ ability to maintain institutional or programmatic accreditation for their programs;
•any disclosure of sensitive information about our learners, customers, educator partners, or their employees, whether due to cyberattack or otherwise;
•any failure to obtain, maintain, protect, and enforce our intellectual property (“IP”) and proprietary rights and successfully defend against claims of infringement, misappropriation, or other violations of third-party IP;
•any disruption or failure of our platform or operations, including as a result of geopolitical crises, natural disasters, public health crises, or other catastrophic events;
•litigation or regulatory proceedings could adversely impact our business and financial condition, including exposing us to significant monetary damages or limiting our ability to operate our business; and
•risks related to our status as a Delaware public benefit corporation (“PBC”) or Certified B Corporation that may negatively impact our financial performance or reputation.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Our historical growth may not be indicative of our future growth, and our revenue may not grow or could decline compared to prior years.
Our historical growth may not be indicative of our future growth, and our revenue may not grow or could decline compared to prior years. Accordingly, you should not rely on our revenue for any previous annual or quarterly period as any indication of our revenue or revenue growth in future periods. As we grow our business, we expect our revenue growth rates may decline compared to prior years due to a variety of factors. These may include more challenging comparisons to prior periods as our revenue grows, slowing demand for our platform or offerings, slowing growth of our sales, increasing competition, increasing regulation, a decrease in the growth of our overall market or market saturation, and our failure to capitalize on growth opportunities. In addition, our growth rates have experienced, and are likely to continue experiencing, volatility due to inflation, currency and interest rate fluctuations, and related shifts in societal, political, and economic circumstances.
Our quarterly and annual revenue and operating results have historically fluctuated from period to period, and may do so in the future, which could cause our stock price to fluctuate and the value of your investment to decline.
Our quarterly and annual revenue and operating results have historically fluctuated from period to period, and our future operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. You should not rely on period-to-period comparisons of our operating results as an indication of our future performance. Factors that may cause fluctuations in our quarterly operating results include, but are not limited to, the following:
•our ability to maintain existing customers and attract new customers, including businesses, government organizations, academic institutions, and other organizations that subscribe to our Enterprise platform, as well as learners who access the content and credentialing programs available on our platform;
•our ability to continue to offer compelling content and degrees or other credentialing programs created by our educator partners;
•changes in, or trends affecting, subscriptions to our platform from businesses, government organizations, academic institutions, and other organizations;
•changes in, or trends affecting, learner enrollment and retention levels, including with respect to learners electing to access our paid offerings;
•our ability to increase and manage the growth of our international operations, including our international learner and customer base, and our ability to manage the risks associated therewith;
•the timing of costs we incur, the timing and amount of revenue generated, the pricing models, or the payment terms associated with launching new content or offerings;
•trends and factors impacting the demand for, and acceptance of, online learning and credentialing programs and the prices consumers and businesses are willing to pay for such programs;
•changes in, or trends affecting, the mix of educator partners, including academic institutions, offering open online courses only and those offering certification, degree, or other credentialing programs;
•changes in the rate, volume, quality, and demand for new content and credentialing programs created and offered by our educator partners on our platform;
•changes in the terms of our existing educator partner agreements and the timing and terms of any new educator partner agreements;
•the timing and amount of our sales and marketing expenses;
•the timing and breadth of platform subscription discounts and promotions;
•costs necessary to improve and maintain our platform and compete on the basis of emerging technologies and functionality;
•changes in our key metrics or the methods used to calculate our key metrics;
•revenue mix shifts between our segments and seasonality, including seasonal engagement patterns of learners and customers, which may vary from quarter to quarter or year to year, and seasonal operating practices or engagement patterns of educator partners resulting from academic calendars or fiscal years that may differ from our own;
•changes in laws, regulations, or accounting principles that impact our business; and
•general political, economic, or market conditions and events affecting any of the above, including the impact of inflation, currency and interest rate fluctuations, labor strikes or other widespread work stoppages, the political environment, the impact of the election season, changes in government spending policies or priorities, geopolitical tensions or hostilities, such as the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, supply chain disruptions, natural disasters, public health crises, or other catastrophic events.
These and other factors may cause our revenue and operating results to fall below our expectations or the expectations of market analysts and investors in future periods, which could cause our stock price to decline substantially. Any decline in our stock price would cause the value of your investment to decline.
Our offerings continue to evolve, and given our limited operating history, predicting our future financial and operating results may be affected by a number of uncertainties.
As a result of the evolving scope of our business and offerings and our limited operating history, our forecasts of future operating results may be less accurate. As we anticipate market opportunities, risks, or other changes, we may adjust our business model or offerings. However, we cannot guarantee that such changes will be accepted by our learners, educator partners, or Enterprise customers, or that they will not result in lower revenues, particularly in the period immediately following the changes. In such cases, we may not realize the anticipated financial benefits of such changes in the amounts we anticipate, on the expected timeline, or at all. For example, in 2024, we shifted our priorities and investments to focus more efforts on our Consumer and Enterprise businesses. We also became more selective in our pursuit of Degrees partnerships and programs that aligned with our platform’s strengths. As a result, we anticipate a decline in Degrees revenue for 2025. If we do not successfully manage our evolving business model and offerings, our operating and financial results may differ materially from our expectations, and our business and stock price may suffer. Our forecasts are subject to a number of uncertainties, including those discussed in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Market adoption of online learning solutions and generative AI are relatively new and may not grow, evolve as we expect, or lead to increased demand for our offerings, which may harm our business and results of operations.
Our future success will depend, in part, on the growth of demand for online learning solutions. The market for online learning solutions is less mature than the market for in-person learning and training, which many businesses currently utilize. These businesses may be slow or unwilling to migrate from these legacy approaches. As such, it is difficult to predict learner, customer, or educator partner demand to use or be on our platform, their adoption and renewal rates, the rate at which they expand their engagement with our platform, the size and growth rate of the market for our platform, the entry of competitive offerings into the market, or the success of existing competitive offerings. Additionally, while we believe that generative AI technology will lead to increased demand for online learning solutions given its potentially disruptive impact on society, governments, businesses, and academic institutions contending with the need for their workforces and learners to reskill and improve productivity and agility, these expected societal changes and the resulting increased demand for our online learning offerings may not materialize as expected or may take longer than anticipated. Also, there can be no assurance that generative AI technology will not displace or otherwise adversely impact the demand for online learning solutions, including our offerings.
Furthermore, even if educators and enterprises want to adopt an online learning solution, a full transition to this type of learning solution could require a substantial amount of time and resources or could be delayed due to budget constraints, weakening economic conditions, or other factors. Even if market demand for online learning solutions generally increases, we cannot ensure that adoption of our platform will also increase. If the market for online learning solutions does not grow as we expect, or our platform does not achieve widespread adoption, it could result in reduced customer spending, learner and partner attrition, and decreased revenue, any of which would adversely affect our business and results of operations.
If we change the contract terms with our educator partners, including pricing or contract length, it could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We collaborate with our educator partners to deliver a broad portfolio of educational content and credentials on our platform. For our Consumer and Enterprise offerings, we incur content costs in the form of fees paid to educator partners. In addition, our Degrees revenue is based on a percentage of the total tuition paid by Degrees students. As a result, changes in university tuition rates, increases in content costs, or other changes in our educator partner agreements could significantly impact our revenue, gross profit, and operating results. For example, starting in 2025, we updated our revenue share allocation arrangements to compensate our educator partners based on the level of learner engagement their content generates, rather than learner completion rates. We have experienced opposition to our content fee terms, and we anticipate similar challenges in the future. Further, we may change the terms of these agreements, including the pricing terms or contract length, due to competitive, regulatory, or other reasons. Any significant change in our pricing, content costs, or other contract terms with our educator partners could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
If we fail to establish, maintain, and expand our educator partners relationships, our ability to grow our business and revenue will suffer.
The success of our business depends in large part on the development, maintenance, and volume of engaging educational content and credentialing programs in collaboration with our educator partners. We have faced, and may continue to face challenges in establishing, maintaining, and expanding these relationships. For instance, our educator partners may need to invest significant time and resources to modify or develop their content and credentialing programs to suit an online learning environment. Online degree programs delivered through academic institutions are not yet widely accepted. Administrators and faculty members may feel they have less control over the educational process and be concerned about the effectiveness of asynchronous learning, potential misuse of generative AI tools by learners to cheat, and the challenge of maintaining on-campus quality standards in an online format. There can be no assurance that online degree programs, such as those offered on our platform, will ever achieve significant market acceptance, and universities may therefore decline to engage with our platform. Further, if we were to lose a significant number of educator partners, especially those who provide a significant portion of the content and programs on our platform, or if we can no longer offer certain high-demand content or programs, our reputation, growth, and revenue would be materially and adversely impacted. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we generated approximately 28% of our total revenue from the content and credentialing programs of our top five educator partners. Total revenue includes both revenue directly attributable to an educator partner and revenue that we do not consider directly attributable, such as revenue from site-wide subscriptions or our Coursera for Teams offering. The loss of or reduction in content and programs from these and other educator partners could negatively affect our ability to sustain or generate revenue or reach future profitability, and would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operation if we are unable to timely secure comparable educational content and credentialing programs at a favorable cost from other educator partners.
Our ability to grow and improve our financial performance depends heavily on our ability to attract and retain learners, including converting our freemium learners to paid learners.
Our revenue growth objectives depend on our ability to attract and retain paid learners. We aim to serve these learners’ needs by providing compelling credentialing programs and high-demand content that is developed in collaboration with our educator partners. We also dedicate a portion of our spend on marketing efforts to attract potential learners to our platform. Many learners initially sign up for the freemium version of our platform or free trials. If learners do not expand beyond our free offerings or certain use cases, our financial results may be adversely affected.
We also provide some offerings, such as certificates, at a substantial discount to learners who demonstrate financial need, which may harm our revenue growth. It is critical for our success that learners renew their subscriptions and expand their relationships with us. There is no obligation for our learners to renew, and they may choose not to do so, which could negatively impact our revenue.
The following factors, many of which are largely outside of our control, may prevent us from attracting, converting, upselling, and retaining learners in a cost-effective manner or at all:
•Negative perceptions about online learning. Online education programs may not be successful or operate efficiently, which could create the perception that online education in general is ineffective. Learners may also be reluctant to enroll in online programs due to concerns about the quality of the learning experience, potential employer hesitation to hire learners who received their education or credentials online, or reluctance from organizations granting professional licenses or certifications to grant them based on credentials, including degrees, earned through online education or training. Further, concerns about the potential misuse of generative AI tools by learners to generate their coursework may be heightened with respect to online programs.
•Reduced support from educator partners. If educator partners cease to maintain or offer new and compelling, credentialing programs or content, or limit our ability to promote their content or programs, learners may reduce or terminate their use of our platform.
•Harm to educator partner reputation. Many factors affecting our educator partners’ reputations are beyond our control and can change over time, including their academic performance and ranking among academic institutions, as well as their status with respect to specific degrees, certifications, or other credentialing programs.
•Lack of interest in the offerings, features, services, certifications, degrees, or other credentials offered on our platform. We may encounter difficulties attracting learners to use our offerings, features, and services, or enroll in credentialing programs that are not in demand due to shifting employer or societal preferences and priorities, or that are in emerging or unproven fields.
•Learner dissatisfaction. Learner dissatisfaction can have a negative impact on learner retention. This dissatisfaction can stem from various factors, including the quality of the offerings, features, services, course content, and presentation. Changes to the availability or sequencing of course content or the course presenters can also contribute to dissatisfaction. Additionally, changing views of the value of our educator partners’ credentialing programs and content offered, as well as perceptions of employment prospects following completion of a program on our platform, can influence learner satisfaction levels. Learner dissatisfaction that is shared via word of mouth or online platforms may also negatively affect the perceptions of potential new learners and negatively impact our learner acquisition efforts.
•Ineffective marketing efforts. Our marketing efforts use various channels (e.g., search engine optimization, television, affiliates, paid search, and custom website development and deployment), publication of content related to higher education and adult learning, career paths, our platform, and our offerings, and we rely on advertising through a limited number of third-party internet advertising platforms to direct traffic to, and recruit new learners for, our offerings. Changes in the way these platforms operate, whether due to changes in law, the practices of mobile operating system providers, or otherwise, or their advertising prices, data use practices, or other terms, have impacted the cost and efficiency of our learner acquisition efforts in the past and could in the future make marketing our offerings more expensive, less effective, or more difficult. In addition, the elimination of a particular medium or platform on which we advertise or changes in advertising practices or advertising spending fluctuations by our largest educator partners have had, and may in the future have, an adverse impact on directing traffic to our offerings and recruiting new learners on a cost-effective basis. Any of the foregoing risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
•Changes in search engine methodologies. We depend in part on various search engines to direct a significant amount of traffic to our website. Our ability to influence the number of learners directed to our website is not entirely within our control. Our website has experienced fluctuations in search result rankings in the past, and we anticipate similar fluctuations in the future. Our competitors’ search engine optimization efforts may result in their websites receiving a higher search result page ranking than ours, or search engines could revise their methodologies to refine their search results or incorporate AI in ways that we cannot predict, which could adversely affect the placement of our search result page ranking, each of which could reduce the number of learners who visit these websites. We may not be able to replace this traffic, and any attempt to do so may require us to increase our sales and marketing expenditures, which may not be offset by additional revenue and could adversely affect our operating results.
•Lack of financial resources for learners. Developments that reduce the availability of financial aid for higher education or reduce disposable income for potential learners (including macroeconomic developments such as inflation, currency and interest rate fluctuations, recessions, unemployment, or pandemics) could impair learners’ abilities to meet their financial obligations, which in turn could result in reduced enrollment and harm our ability to generate revenue.
•General economic conditions. Enrollment in the courses and credentialing programs offered on our platform may be affected by changes in the U.S. economy and by global economic conditions. For example, an improvement in economic conditions may reduce demand for adult learning as potential learners may find adequate employment without additional education. Conversely, a decline in employment opportunities or economic conditions may reduce employers’ willingness to sponsor adult learning opportunities for employees given a lack of employer need for enhanced skill sets or an inability to fund such programs. This could discourage learners from pursuing further education due to an inability to afford our programs or a perception that the financial investment may not result in increased earning potential or improved employment opportunities. In addition, if current macroeconomic conditions persist or deteriorate, our ability to attract and retain paid learners in our Consumer segment, as well as current and prospective customers in our Enterprise segment, could be adversely affected by reductions or delays in their spending decisions.
Any of these factors could reduce enrollment and retention and could cause our costs associated with attracting and retaining learners to increase, which could materially harm our ability to increase our revenue or achieve profitability. These developments could also harm our reputation and make it more difficult for us to maintain our current content and credentialing programs and engage our educator partners for new course content or other offerings, which in turn may negatively impact our ability to expand our business and improve our financial performance.
If we fail to manage the growth of our business both in terms of scale and complexity, our financial results, including profit margins and financial condition, could be adversely affected.
We have experienced growth and demand for our product offerings amongst both individuals and institutions. The expansion of our business, ecosystem, and offerings places a significant strain on our administrative and operational infrastructure, facilities, and other resources. Managing the future growth of our business will require us to effectively scale our operations, allocate resources, and control costs. This includes continuing to improve our sales and marketing efficiency, content development time and costs, and technology, finance, and administration teams support globally, as well as our infrastructure and platform capabilities to serve our growing learner base. We will also be required to refine our operational, financial, and management controls and reporting systems and procedures. We will need to continue to expand our relationships with businesses, government organizations, academic institutions, and other organizations, enhance our platform and technology-enabled services, increase the volume of new educational content and credentialing programs developed by our educator partners, attract a higher volume of learners and customers in a cost-effective manner, deploy preferred local payment methods and pricing models, satisfy our existing educator partners’ requirements, respond to competitive challenges, and otherwise execute our business plan. Although our business has experienced significant growth in past years, we cannot provide any assurance that our business or revenue will continue to grow at the same rate or at all in the future.
The scalability and flexibility of our platforms depend on the functionality of our technology and network infrastructure, as well as our ability to handle increased traffic and demand for bandwidth. The growth in the number of learners and customers using our platform, coupled with the increase in educational content available through our platform, has led to an increase in the amount of data and the number of requests that we process.
Our ability to effectively manage the growth of our business will depend on a number of factors, including our ability to:
•effectively recruit, integrate, train, and motivate new employees while retaining high-performing employees that help us effectively execute our business plan;
•continue to improve our operational, financial, and management controls;
•protect and further develop our strategic assets, including our IP rights; and
•make sound business decisions in light of the scrutiny associated with operating as a public company.
These activities will require significant capital expenditures and allocation of valuable management and employee resources. We may be unable to effectively manage any future growth in an efficient, cost-effective, or timely manner, or at all, which could negatively affect our financial results and profit margins. Any failure to successfully implement systems enhancements and improvements could negatively impact our ability to manage our expected growth, ensure uninterrupted operation of key business systems, and comply with the rules and regulations that are applicable to public reporting companies. Moreover, if we do not effectively manage the growth of our business and operations globally, the quality of our platform could suffer, which would negatively affect our reputation, results of operations, and overall business.
We may change the contract terms, including our pricing models, for our offerings, which in turn could impact our operating results.
We have limited experience with respect to determining the optimal prices and contract length for our offerings, and as a result, we have in the past, and expect that we may in the future, change our pricing models or target contract length from time to time, which could impact our operating and financial results. We continue to adjust our pricing models and conduct pricing experiments as we gain experience with our offerings. From time-to-time, we test pricing localization to account for market segmentation and conduct other pricing experiments. As the market for our learning platform grows (if ever), as new competitors introduce competitive applications or services, or as we enter into new international markets, we may be unable to attract new learners or customers at the same price or based on the same pricing models we have historically used, or for contract lengths consistent with our historical averages. In addition, as we develop and roll out new offerings, or expand existing offerings, we will need to develop pricing and contract models for these offerings that appeal to learners and customers over time, and we may not be successful in doing so. Pricing and contract length decisions may also impact the mix of adoption and retention among our offerings and negatively impact our overall revenue. Competition may require us to make substantial price concessions or accept shorter contract durations, or other unfavorable contract terms. Our revenue and financial position may be adversely affected by any of the foregoing, and we may have increased difficulty achieving profitability.
Our current operations are international in scope, and we plan to expand our international operations, which exposes us to related inherent risks.
Operating in international markets requires significant resources and management attention and subjects us to regulatory, economic, contractual, reputational, and political risks that are different from those in the U.S. We have employees in various countries, with the largest employee populations in the U.S., India, Canada, and the United Kingdom, and we have retained professional employer organizations and staffing agencies to engage personnel in certain international locations. Our international operations subject us to the compensation and benefits regulations of those jurisdictions, as well as other employer duties and obligations, that differ from the U.S. Further, enrollments of learners from other countries require us to comply with international data privacy regulations of those countries. Failure to comply with international regulations or to adequately adapt to international markets could harm our ability to successfully operate our business and pursue our business goals.
We intend to expand our international operations and continue to establish a worldwide educator partner and learner base. Our expansion efforts into international markets may not be successful. In addition, we face risks in doing business internationally, including risks associated with sales to international governments and entities that could constrain our operations, increase our cost structure, compromise our growth prospects, lead to escalating enforcement actions, and damage our reputation, including:
•the need to localize and adapt online credentialing programs for specific countries, including language translations and ensuring that these programs enable our educator partners to comply with local education laws and regulations;
•local laws restricting learners from pursuing certifications, degrees, or other credentials through online education platforms such as ours or limiting the availability of financial aid to finance online education;
•different data privacy and protection laws, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Privacy, Cybersecurity, and Infrastructure”;
•difficulties in staffing and managing employees and contractors in foreign countries, including in countries in which workers based outside of the U.S. may become part of labor unions, employee representative bodies, workers’ councils, or collective bargaining agreements, and challenges relating to labor shortages, government shutdowns, work stoppages, such as labor strikes or lockouts, or slowdowns;
•risks related to employee travel, including illness or accident, detention by foreign authorities, poor transportation infrastructure or services, kidnapping, natural or manmade disasters, or the outbreak of hostilities or war;
•different pricing environments, longer sales cycles, longer accounts receivable payment cycles, restrictions on remitting payments to the U.S. or converting local currency into U.S. dollars, difficulties in adopting and supporting new and different payment preferences, increased credit risk, levels of payment fraud, and non-payment from customers;
•new and different sources of competition and practices, which may favor local competitors;
•weaker protection for IP and other legal and contractual rights than in the U.S., and practical difficulties in enforcing IP and other rights outside of the U.S., including legal and contractual rights, and differing expectations regarding ongoing contractual obligations in the face of changed circumstances;
•compliance and operational challenges related to the complexity of multiple, conflicting, and changing laws and regulations addressing, but not limited to, employment, tax, privacy, data protection, consumer protection, foreign investment restrictions or requirements, economic sanctions, export controls, advertising, boycotting, money laundering, supply chain transparency, modern slavery, bribery, and corruption, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act;
•creation and distribution of content that may be misaligned with U.S. or foreign country interests, cultural norms, or regulations;
•increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and complexities;
•risks associated with foreign tax regimes, trade tariffs, foreign investment restrictions or requirements, or similar issues, which could negatively impact international adoption of our offerings;
•adverse tax consequences, including corporate tax consequences, such as double taxation, transfer pricing burdens, taxation of dividends, value added taxes, digital services taxes, and withholding taxes;
•difficulties in managing foreign business operations, including the potential need to localize our business infrastructure, translating our policies and information technology systems into the local language, and local challenges related to technology as well as internet speed and availability, among other challenges; and
•regional, global, economic, and political conditions, including geopolitical tensions or hostilities within or beyond areas where we currently have, or may in the future have, international operations, such as the ongoing conflicts and unrest in Ukraine and the Middle East.
Further, as we continue to expand internationally, we may become more exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Future agreements with international learners, customers, and educator partners may require payments to be denominated in local currencies. In such cases, fluctuations in the local currency value relative to the U.S. dollar could impact our operating results. When the U.S. dollar strengthens relative to foreign currencies, the real cost of our offerings increases for our international learners and customers to the extent we base the price of such offerings on the U.S. dollar. This could lead to the lengthening of our sales cycle or reduced demand for our offerings. Conversely, when the U.S. dollar weakens relative to the foreign currencies of our international subsidiaries, our operational costs increase for those locations. If we are unable to successfully hedge against these foreign currency risks, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. To date, our foreign currency risk exposure has not been material, and as such, we have not entered into any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce this risk. While we may decide to enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedging transactions may be limited, the results may not be as intended, and we may not be able to successfully hedge our exposure, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We intend to launch new offerings and services to learners and customers to grow our business. If our efforts are not successful, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Our ability to attract and retain learners and customers, as well as increase their engagement with our platform, depends on our ability to connect them with appropriate offerings and services. Part of our strategy is to offer them new offerings and services in an increasingly relevant and personalized way. We may develop such offerings and services independently, by acquisition, or in conjunction with third parties, but there is no guarantee these approaches will be successful. The markets for new offerings and services may be unproven, and these offerings may include technologies and business models with which we have little or no prior experience or may significantly change our existing offerings and services. If we are not able to create an experience that allows learners and customers to easily and effectively identify the offerings and services that meet their needs, we may not grow our learner and customer base or generate sufficient revenue, operating margin, or other value to justify our investments, and our business could be adversely affected.
We have incurred significant net losses since inception, and we may not achieve or maintain profitability in the future.
We incurred net losses of $79.5 million, $116.6 million, and $175.4 million in the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, and we had an accumulated deficit of $860.2 million and $780.7 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. We may not achieve profitability in the future, and even if we do, we may not be able to maintain or increase our level of profitability.
We will need to generate and sustain increased revenue levels in future periods while controlling costs to achieve profitability, and even if we achieve profitability, we may not be able to maintain or increase our level of profitability. We anticipate that our operating expenses will increase substantially for the foreseeable future as we continue to, among other things:
•expand our course offerings and the robustness of our platform;
•expand our learner base and our sales and marketing efforts;
•improve and scale our technology;
•enter and expand into additional international markets;
•address increased competition; and
•incur significant accounting, legal, and other expenses as a public company.
Certain expenditures, including those to expand our course offerings and the robustness of our platform, grow our learner and customer base, expand our sales and marketing efforts, and improve and scale our technology and operations, may make it more difficult for us to achieve and maintain profitability. Our efforts to grow our business may be more costly than we expect, and we may not be able to grow our revenue enough to offset our expenses. Restructuring and expense reduction initiatives, including the initiative announced in October 2024 (refer to Note 14, “Restructuring Related Charges”, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K), could negatively impact our business, our growth, and our operational performance if they do not achieve or sustain the targeted benefits, the benefits are not adequate to meet our long-term profitability and operational expectations, costs are materially higher than expected, management’s attention is diverted, employee attrition is beyond our intended reduction in force or in key roles, we experience lower employee morale, or our reputation as an employer is damaged harming our ability to retain and attract talent. As a result, we can provide no assurance as to whether or when we will achieve profitability. If we are not able to achieve and maintain profitability, the value of our Company and our stock price could decline significantly, and you could lose some or all of your investment.
We may not generate sufficient revenue from a new offering to offset our costs.
Our platform enables our educator partners to offer learners the opportunity to enroll in live, or synchronous, courses and programs and pre-produced, or asynchronous, educational content that can be accessed at any time. To launch new educational content or a new credentialing program, whether synchronous or asynchronous, we may need to integrate our platform with the various learner information and other operating systems our educator partners use to manage functions within their institutions. In addition, our content development team must work closely with our educator partners to produce engaging online course content, and we must commence learner acquisition activities. During the term of our educator partner agreements, we are responsible for the costs associated with maintaining our platform and providing non-academic and other support for learners enrolled in the program. We invest significant resources in these new programs from the beginning of our relationship with an educator partner, including marketing and other learner acquisition costs to attract and fill enrollment cohorts for a program, and in some cases, content development grants to assist our educator partners as they invest resources preparing content for an online medium. There is no guarantee that we will ever recoup these costs. In addition, delays in implementing a new program, including Specializations, certifications, or Degrees programs, could negatively impact our revenue and operating results.
Because we receive fees from learners enrolling in, and, in some cases, completing courses and credentialing programs on our platform, we only begin to recover these costs once learners enroll and begin paying fees. In addition, in some cases, learners may audit a course or courses toward a certification free of charge and elect not to pay for the certification itself. Further, our Degrees revenue is determined based on a percentage of the total tuition collected from Degrees students by the university partner. As a result, our Degrees revenue is dependent on the number of learners enrolled in the Degrees program and the tuition charged by the university partner. The time that it takes for us to recover our investment in a new course or program depends on a variety of factors, primarily our learner acquisition costs, learner retention rate, and the growth rate of learner enrollment in and, in some cases, completion of, the course or program. Because of the lengthy period required to recoup our investment in a program, unexpected developments beyond our control could occur that result in the educator partner ceasing or significantly curtailing a course offering or credentialing program before we generate any revenue therefrom. In addition, educator partners generally do not grant us exclusive rights to their content, and any such arrangements are of limited duration. As such, educator partners may choose to offer the same content on one of our competitors’ platforms or their own platform, which could limit the number of learners enrolled in such partner’s courses or programs on our platform. In addition, if an educator partner were to terminate an existing program, learners enrolled in that program may stop using our platform, which in turn would negatively impact our learner enrollment generally. As a result of any of the foregoing, we may ultimately be unable to recover the full investment that we make in a new offering or achieve any level of profitability from such offering.
If we pursue unsuccessful educator partner opportunities, we may forego more profitable opportunities, and our operating results and growth could be harmed.
Identifying educational content and credentialing programs that we believe will be a good fit for our learner and customer base and negotiating educator partner agreements is complex and time-consuming. This can be due to the initial reluctance of some businesses, government organizations, academic institutions, and other organizations to embrace online delivery of education, training, and credentialing programs and the complicated approval process within some of these entities.
We, our educator partners, and content production providers may devote significant effort and time to develop and launch new content or a credentialing program. We have spent, and may continue to spend, substantial effort and management resources to secure new educator partners and to work with our existing educator partners to develop, launch, and maintain content and credentialing programs without any assurance that our efforts will result in a successful launch or revenue generation that will exceed our costs. If we invest substantial resources pursuing opportunities that do not attract sufficient interest from learners and customers, we may forgo other more successful content and program development efforts, and our operating results, revenue, and growth could be harmed.
Failure to effectively expand our sales and marketing capabilities could harm our ability to increase our customer base and achieve broader market acceptance of our platform.
Our ability to broaden our customer base, particularly our Enterprise customer base, and achieve broader market acceptance of our platform, will depend to a significant extent on the ability of our sales and marketing organizations to work together to increase our sales pipeline and cultivate customer relationships to drive revenue growth. Our marketing efforts include the use of search engine optimization, paid search, and custom website development and deployment.
We plan to continue investing in and expanding our Enterprise sales and marketing organization, both domestically and internationally. Identifying, recruiting, and training sales personnel requires significant time, expense, and attention. If we are unable to hire, develop, and retain talented sales or marketing personnel, if our new sales or marketing personnel are unable to achieve desired productivity levels in a reasonable period of time (including as a result of working remotely), if our sales and marketing programs are not effective, or if expected sales and marketing programs by our educator partners do not materialize or are not effective, our ability to broaden our customer base and achieve broader market acceptance of our platform could be harmed. In addition, the investments we make in our sales and marketing organization will occur in advance of experiencing benefits from such investments, making it difficult to determine in a timely manner if we are efficiently allocating our resources in these areas.
If we fail to quickly and efficiently scale our operations and platform capabilities to support the needs of new and existing educator partners, our reputation and our revenue will suffer.
Our continued growth and potential profitability depend on our ability to successfully scale our operations and platform capabilities to support newly launched educational content and credentialing programs with our educator partners. If we cannot quickly and efficiently scale our sales, marketing, and technology teams, which includes the hiring and training of new employees, we may not be successful in attracting potential learners and customers to our platform, which would negatively impact our ability to generate revenue, and our educator partners could lose confidence in us. If we cannot quickly and efficiently scale our technology and operations to handle increases in the volume and rate of learner enrollments and of new content or credentialing programs, our educator partners’, learners’, and customers’ experiences with our platform may suffer, which in turn could damage our reputation. Our ability to effectively manage any significant increase in the rate or volume of learner enrollments and retention or in the volume of new content or programs will depend on a number of factors, including our ability to:
•assist our educator partners in developing, launching, and maintaining an increased volume of engaging educational content that is accessible to a wide variety of learners;
•successfully introduce new features and enhancements on our platform;
•maintain a high level of functionality, cross-functionality, and technological robustness of our platform; and
•deliver high-quality professional services and support (including training, implementation, and consulting services) to our educator partners, their employees, and learners on our platform.
Establishing new credentialing programs and content or expanding existing ones will require us to make investments in management and critical roles, increase capital expenditures, incur additional marketing expenses, and potentially reallocate other resources. If we are unable to scale our platform, maintain and increase its interoperability, develop an increasingly robust mix of engaging content, or otherwise manage new offerings effectively, our ability to grow our business and achieve profitability would be impaired, and the quality of our solutions, access to learner information and progress, and the satisfaction of our educator partners, learners, and customers could suffer, or our educator partners could transition content hosted on our platform to other providers, while we continue to provide certain services.
Disruptions to the operations of one or more of our third-party service providers may adversely affect our business operations and financial condition.
We, and our educator partners, rely on a variety of third-party service providers to support our operations by providing customer support, mobile network, internet, content production, platform integration, and other services. We, and our educator partners, may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate disruptions to the operations of our third-party service providers, which could arise from any of a number of different reasons, including financial instability, work stoppages or slowdowns, staffing difficulties, war, or the outbreak of hostilities, staff illness, inclement weather, or natural disasters. Disruptions to the operations of our third-party service providers could result in communication, content production, platform performance, or platform availability problems for us and our educator partners, which could adversely affect our business operations and financial condition.
If we fail to adapt and respond effectively to rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, and changing customer needs or requirements, our platform may become less competitive.
Our future success depends on our ability to adapt and enhance our platform. To attract new learners, customers, and educator partners and increase revenue from our existing base, we will need to continuously enhance and improve our offerings to meet their needs at prices that our learners and customers are willing to pay. Such efforts will require adding new functionality and responding to technological advancements, which will increase our research and development costs. If we are unable to develop educational content that addresses learners’ and customers’ needs, or enhance and improve our platform in a timely manner, or if we fail to provide adequate safeguards and quality assurance related to the use of new technological advancements, we may not be able to maintain or increase market acceptance and use of our platform. Further, some of our competitors expend a considerably greater amount of funds on their research and development programs, and their sales and marketing practices, and those that do not may be acquired by larger companies that could allocate greater resources to our competitors’ research and development programs. If we fail to maintain adequate research and development resources or compete effectively with the research and development programs of our competitors, our business could be harmed. Our ability to grow is also subject to the risk of future disruptive technologies. Access to and use of our platform is provided via the internet, which, itself, was disruptive to the previous enterprise software model. If new technologies emerge that can deliver online learning programs at lower prices, more efficiently, more conveniently, more securely, with stronger or more cost-effective mechanisms to detect and prevent plagiarism or validate the learner’s identity, or with more preferred or up-to-date content, and if we, or our educator partners, fail to adopt such technologies or fail to do so in a timely manner, our ability to compete would be adversely affected. For example, the emergence of enhanced generative AI capabilities could provide such advantages to online learning providers able to deploy the technology effectively.
Our introduction and use of AI may not be successful and may present business, compliance, and reputational challenges, which could lead to operational or reputational damage, competitive harm, legal and regulatory risk, and additional costs, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We have incorporated, and expect to continue to incorporate, AI in the content and credentials offerings from our educator partners, as well as in our AI-powered platform innovations and features. The incorporation of AI in our business and operations may become more significant over time. The use of generative AI technology, which is considered to be a relatively new and emerging technology in the early stages of commercial use, exposes us to additional risks, which could result in damage to our reputation, competitive position, and business, and expose us to legal and regulatory risks and additional costs. For example, AI algorithms are based on machine learning and predictive analytics, which can create inaccurate or misleading content, unintended biases, and other discriminatory or unexpected results. Accordingly, while AI-powered applications may help provide more tailored or personalized learner experiences, if the content, analyses, or recommendations that AI applications assist in producing on our platform are, or are perceived to be, deficient, inaccurate, or biased, our reputation, competitive position, and business may be materially and adversely affected.
Further, the use of AI technology is subject to ongoing debate in the education industry, including with respect to issues such as plagiarism, cheating, academic integrity, and the scope of appropriate or permissible use of generative AI in the context of both learning and teaching. For example, there is a risk that AI-generated information may be inaccurate or misleading, or not appropriately attribute authors or creators for their work (including if used in the context of content creation), or that students may use generative AI to draft written assignments or for other projects, any of which, absent sufficient and cost-effective methods to detect and prevent such risks, may devalue or undervalue the certificates and other credentials offered through our platform due to the actual or perceived threat of increased plagiarism or cheating, concerns of academic integrity, or appropriate and permissible use of AI. Any of the foregoing or similar issues, whether actual or perceived, could negatively impact the learner experience and diminish the perceived quality and value of the content and certifications provided through our platform to learners, employers, or organizations granting professional licenses or certifications. This in turn could damage our brand, reputation, competitive position, and business. In addition, the use of AI technology has resulted in, and may in the future result in, cybersecurity incidents that implicate the personal data of end users of AI applications. To the extent we experience cybersecurity incidents in connection with our use of AI technology, it could similarly adversely affect our reputation and expose us to legal liability or regulatory risk. Further, our competitors or other third parties may incorporate AI into their products more quickly or more successfully than us, which could impair our ability to compete effectively.
As the utilization of AI becomes more prevalent, we anticipate that it will continue to present new or unanticipated ethical, technical, legal, competitive, and regulatory issues, among others. We expect that our incorporation of AI in our business will require additional resources, including the incurrence of additional costs, to develop and maintain our platform offerings, services, and features to minimize potentially harmful or unintended consequences, to comply with applicable laws and regulations, to maintain or extend our competitive position, and to address any reputational, technical, or operational issues which may arise as a result of the foregoing. As a result, the challenges presented with our use of AI could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
If we fail to increase sales of our Enterprise offerings, or if we need to change the contract terms associated therewith, including with respect to pricing or contract length, it could negatively affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
In addition to our offerings for individuals, we sell our Enterprise offerings to businesses, government organizations, academic institutions, and other organizations. These customers utilize our platform to provide relevant training, skills, and credentialing programs to current and potential employees and citizens. To maintain and expand our relationships with these entities, we must demonstrate the value, benefits, and return on investment of providing education, training, skills, and credentialing through our online platform and achieve acceptance from both employees and these entities of the merits and legitimacy of our offerings.
Our growth strategy is dependent upon increasing sales of our Enterprise offerings to these entities, which we offer on a subscription basis. Changes to our subscription and pricing models could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain Enterprise customers, resulting in adverse impact to our revenue and financial condition. In addition, as the market for our learning platform grows (if ever), as new competitors introduce competitive applications or services, or as we enter into new international markets, we may be unable to attract new customers at the same price or based on the same pricing models we have historically used, or for contract lengths consistent with our historical averages. For example, we often enter into subscription arrangements in which we offer more favorable pricing terms in exchange for larger total contract values or longer contract terms. Changes to our pricing models or contract lengths could negatively impact our revenue and financial position, and we may have increased difficulty achieving growth or profitability.
We generally recognize revenue from Enterprise customer subscriptions ratably over the subscription term of the underlying contract, which typically ranges from one to three years. Consequently, a decline in new or renewed subscriptions in any quarter or year will not be fully reflected in revenue or other results of operations in that quarter or year but will negatively affect our revenue and other results of operations across future periods. Further, increases in the average subscription term without a relative increase in the average contract value would result in revenue for those contracts being recognized over longer periods of time with less positive impact on our results of operations in the near term. Accordingly, such changes could adversely affect our financial performance.
As we seek to increase sales of our Enterprise offerings, we face upfront sales costs, higher customer acquisition costs, more complex customer requirements, and discount requirements. In addition, certain Enterprise customers may require education and interactions with our sales team, which increases our upfront cost in the sales effort with no guarantee that our platform will be used widely enough across their organization to justify our upfront cost. Similarly, we may also incur significant upfront costs for contracts that are not renewed, or for which the customer seeks to terminate early, even in the absence of a breach on our part or contractual terms permitting an early termination. From time to time, customers notify us that they wish to terminate early, either seeking a refund of their prior payments or conveying an intention to stop or reduce any further payments due, or both. Even if we believe we are entitled to these payments, it may not be feasible to retain prior payments or collect future payments due to us, and our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted. If we are unable to maintain or increase the number of subscriptions while mitigating the risks associated with serving our Enterprise customers, our business, financial condition, and results of operations will suffer.
If we fail to maintain sufficient high-quality content from our educator partners, we will be unable to attract and retain learners and customers.
Our success depends on our ability to provide learners and customers with the information, outcomes, academic credit, and certifications they seek, which in turn depends on the quantity, quality, and format of the educational content provided by our educator partners. We may be unable to provide learners and customers with the information and outcomes they seek if our educator partners do not contribute content that is helpful and reliable, if they remove content, or if supplemental or derivative materials are not reliable. If content on our platform attracts unfavorable media coverage or other commentary, our reputation and prospects could be harmed. We believe that certain learners value courses for which they can earn academic credit toward a degree or other credential. We may be unable to provide learners with such courses if our educator partners do not obtain or maintain the certification or quality necessary for such eligibility, and our business would be adversely affected. Further, if such certifications are obtained and maintained, but do not, or cease to, signal to learners and employers the high quality or reliability we, or our educator partners, intend to signal through such certifications, our business would be adversely affected. Any of the foregoing could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, competitive position, and growth prospects.
We believe that many of our new learners find us by word of mouth and other non-paid referrals from existing learners. If existing learners, customers. and educator partners are dissatisfied with their experience on our platform, they may stop accessing our content and may stop referring others to us. The impact of learner dissatisfaction could be compounded if existing learners share negative experiences with potential new learners, via online platforms or otherwise. Likewise, if existing learners do not find our educational content appealing, because of declining interest in or relevancy of the content, they may stop referring others to us. In turn, if educator partners perceive that our platform lacks an adequate learner audience, they may be less willing to place content on our platform, and the learner experience could be negatively impacted. If we are unable to attract and retain learners, customers, and educator partners who contribute to an active community, our growth prospects would be harmed, and our business could be adversely affected.
We face competition from established companies as well as other emerging companies, which could divert educator partners to our competitors, result in pricing pressure, impact our market share, and significantly reduce our revenue.
The ecosystem for global adult online learning is highly fragmented and rapidly evolving. We expect alternative modes of learning to continue to accelerate as existing players and new entrants in this industry introduce new and more competitive products, enhancements, and bundles.
Participants in the global adult online learning ecosystem include, but are not limited to: 2U, Inc., including through its subsidiary edX Inc.; Alison (Capernaum Limited); DataCamp, Inc.; Degreed, Inc.; Eruditus Learning Solutions Pte. Ltd.; Global University Systems, operating the platform FutureLearn; Go1 Pty Limited; Google LLC through its YouTube services; Great Learning PTE Ltd.; Khan Academy, Inc.; LinkedIn Corporation through its LinkedIn Learning services; MasterClass; Noodle Partners, Inc.; OpenSesame Inc.; Pluralsight, Inc.; Risepoint (formerly known as Academic Partnerships); Simplilearn, Skillshare, Inc.; Skillsoft Corp.; Udacity, Inc.; Udemy, Inc.; upGrad Education Private Limited; The Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.; and internal online degree platforms developed in-house by universities. In addition, providers that leverage AI capabilities, including large language models, are increasingly offering education-focused capabilities, such as self-paced learning, custom course creation and on-demand tutoring.
We expect new and existing companies in the online learning industry to continually revise and improve their business models. If industry participants introduce new or improved delivery of online education and technology-enabled services that are more compelling or widely accepted than ours, our ability to grow our revenue and achieve profitability could suffer. New or existing companies in the online education industry provide or may in the future provide offerings similar to what we offer on our platform, and such companies may pursue relationships with our educator partners that may reduce the educational content our educator partners produce for our platform. In addition, academic institutions, as well as businesses, government, and other organizations, may choose to continue using or developing their own online learning or training solutions in-house. This may become more prevalent as emerging technologies, such as generative AI, provide additional means of developing educational programs. Consequently, they may opt for these alternatives rather than pay for our solutions.
Some of our competitors and potential competitors have significantly greater resources than we do. Increased competition may result in pricing pressure for us in terms of the prices learners and customers are willing to pay for our offerings or the costs we are charged by our educator partners. The competitive landscape may also result in a longer and more complex process of recruiting and maintaining current and prospective educator partners or a decrease in our market share, any of which could negatively affect our revenue and future operating results and our ability to grow our business.
A number of factors could impact our ability to compete, including:
•the availability or development of alternative online education services that are, or are perceived to be, more compelling than ours;
•changes in pricing policies and terms offered by our competitors or by us;
•our ability to adapt to new technologies and changing requirements of our learners, customers, and educator partners;
•learner and customer acquisition and retention costs;
•the ability of our current and future competitors to establish relationships with businesses, government organizations, academic institutions, and other organizations to enhance their services and expand their customer base; and
•industry consolidation and the number and rate of new entrants.
We may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors. In addition, competition may intensify as our competitors raise additional capital and as established companies in other market segments or geographic markets expand into our market segments or geographic markets. If we cannot compete successfully against our competitors, our ability to grow our business and achieve profitability could be impaired.
If for-profit postsecondary institutions, which offer online education alternatives different from ours, or other for-profit higher education service providers, perform poorly, it could nonetheless tarnish the reputation of online education as a whole, which could impair our ability to grow our business.
For-profit postsecondary institutions, many of which provide course offerings predominantly online, are under intense regulatory and other scrutiny, which has led to media attention that has sometimes portrayed that sector in an unflattering light. Some for-profit online school operators have been subject to government investigations alleging the misuse of public funds, financial irregularities, and failure to achieve positive outcomes for learners, including the inability to obtain employment in their fields, or to earn sufficient income to repay debt incurred for their education. These allegations have attracted significant adverse media coverage and have prompted legislative hearings and regulatory responses. These investigations have focused on specific companies and individuals, as well as entire industries in the case of recruiting practices by for-profit higher education companies. Even though we do not offer credentialing programs with these institutions, this negative media attention and regulatory scrutiny may nevertheless add to the skepticism about online higher education generally, including our solutions. Certain service providers assisting higher education institutions with online program development and management, typically referred to as online program managers (“OPMs”), are also under intense media and other scrutiny, which has led to calls for reform and enforcement by policymakers and members of Congress. Even though we do not have the kinds of affiliations or business models that have been the focus of this scrutiny, this negative media attention and regulatory scrutiny may lead to additional limitations or restrictions on our business, and our ability to grow our business and achieve profitability could be harmed.
The impact of these negative public perceptions on our current and future business is difficult to predict. If these few situations, or any additional misconduct, cause all online learning programs to be viewed unfavorably by the public or policymakers, we may find it difficult to enter into or renew agreements with our educator partners or attract additional learners and customers for their programs. In addition, this perception or any further government investigation could serve as the impetus for more restrictive legislation or regulation, which could limit our future business opportunities. Moreover, allegations of abuse of federal financial aid funds and other statutory violations against for-profit higher education companies could negatively impact our ability to succeed due to increased regulation and decreased demand. Any of these factors could negatively impact our ability to increase our educator partner base and grow their programs, which would make it difficult to continue growing our business and could negatively affect our stock price.
Our growth strategy may contemplate acquisitions, and we may be unsuccessful in executing, implementing, integrating, or leveraging such acquisitions.
We may choose to expand our business by making acquisitions that could be material. To date, we have only completed one acquisition, and our ability as an organization to successfully identify, evaluate, acquire, and integrate technologies or businesses is unproven and limited. Acquisitions involve many risks, including the following:
•an acquisition may negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition because it may require us to incur charges or assume substantial debt or other liabilities, may cause adverse tax consequences or unfavorable accounting treatment, may expose us to claims and disputes by third parties, including IP claims and disputes, or may not generate sufficient financial return to offset additional costs and expenses related to the acquisition;
•we may encounter difficulties or unforeseen expenditures in integrating the business, technologies, products, personnel, or operations of any entity or business that we acquire, particularly if key personnel of the acquired entity or business decide not to work for us;
•an acquisition may disrupt our ongoing business and distract our management;
•an acquisition may result in a delay or reduction of customer purchases for both us and the entity or business we acquired due to customer uncertainty about continuity and effectiveness of service;
•an acquisition may involve entry into geographic or business markets in which we have little or no prior experience or where competitors have stronger market positions;
•we may face challenges inherent in effectively managing an increased number of employees in diverse locations;
•we may experience strain on our financial and managerial controls and reporting systems and procedures;
•our use of cash to pay for acquisitions would limit other potential uses for our cash;
•if we incur debt to fund such acquisitions, such debt may subject us to material restrictions on our ability to conduct our business;
•we may incur impairment charges related to potential write-downs of acquired assets or goodwill; and
•to the extent that we issue a significant amount of equity or equity-based securities in connection with an acquisition, existing stockholders may be diluted.
We may not succeed in addressing these or other risks, which could harm our business and operating results.
We may invest in private companies, and if the value of any such equity investments were to decline, it could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We may from time to time make equity investments in private companies where we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over results. Investments in private companies are inherently risky. The companies in which we may invest include early-stage companies that may still be developing products and services with limited cash to support the development, marketing, and sales of their products, and whose financial statements are often unaudited. Further, our ability to liquidate such investments will typically be dependent on a liquidity event, such as a public offering or acquisition, as no public market currently exists for the securities held in the investees. Valuations of privately held companies are inherently complex and uncertain due to the lack of a liquid market for the securities of such companies and the potential lack of comparable acquisitions in the market as a comparison for such valuations, among other factors. If we determine that any of our investments in such companies have experienced a decline in value, we will recognize an impairment expense to adjust the carrying value to its estimated fair value. Negative changes in the estimated fair value of private companies in which we invest could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our directors may encounter conflicts of interest involving us and other organizations with which they may be affiliated, including matters that involve corporate opportunities.
Most of our directors are, and any future directors may be, affiliated with other entities, including venture capital or private equity funds or businesses that may be complementary, competitive, or potentially competitive to our Company. They may also in the future become affiliated with entities that are engaged in business or other activities similar to our business. Additionally, all of our officers and directors, in the course of their other business activities, may become aware of investments, business opportunities, or information that may be appropriate for presentation to us as well as to other entities to which they owe a fiduciary duty. As a result, directors and officers may encounter perceived or actual conflicts of interest involving us and other entities with which they are or become affiliated, including matters that involve corporate opportunities. A portfolio company of a director-affiliated venture fund may become a competitor of ours or a potential strategic partner. In addition, as our growth strategy includes considering potential acquisitions, it is possible an entity affiliated with one of our directors could be an acquisition target or a competitive acquirer.
Further, to the extent we engage in transactions with any director-affiliated entity, it could create actual, or the perception of, additional conflicts of interest, including with respect to our ability to negotiate terms equivalent to those that could be obtained in an arms’-length negotiation with an unaffiliated third party. For instance, Dr. Ng, one of our co-founders and Chairman of our board of directors (the “Board”), owns DeepLearning.AI Corp., a developer of educational content relating to AI that offers courses through our platform. Although we view DeepLearning.AI Corp. as a valued educator partner and believe our agreement is on commercially reasonable terms, there may nonetheless be a perception of a conflict of interest.
As a result of the foregoing, our directors and officers may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity particular opportunities or information should be presented. If, as a result of such potential conflicts, we are deprived of investment, business, or information, the execution of our business plan and our ability to effectively compete may be adversely affected. Our directors are also not obligated to commit their time and attention exclusively to our business, and accordingly, they may encounter conflicts of interest in allocating their time and resources between us and other entities with which they are affiliated.
We depend on our senior management and other key employees to grow and operate our business, and if we are unable to hire, retain and motivate our personnel, we may not be able to grow effectively.
Our future success is substantially dependent on our continued ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate, and retain highly skilled personnel, including senior management, engineers, sales, product managers, operations, and general and administrative functions. The expertise of our senior management team in negotiating with businesses, government organizations, academic institutions, and other organizations is critical in navigating the complex approval processes of these entities. We do not maintain key-person insurance on any of our employees, and our U.S. employees are generally employed on an at-will basis. There have been, and from time to time, there may continue to be, changes in our senior management team and key employees, which could disrupt our business. Some of senior management members have been with us for a short period of time, and we continue to develop key functions within various aspects of our business. For example, in February 2025, Mr. Hart joined us as our President, Chief Executive Officer, and Board member. The loss of one or more of our senior management members or other key employees, or the failure of our senior management team to work together effectively, develop strategies, and execute our plans, could harm our business. Further, the failure to successfully transition and assimilate key employees could adversely affect our business operations.
Our future success also depends heavily on the retention of our highly-qualified employees to continue to attract and retain learners and customers, thereby generating revenue for us. In particular, our technology and content development employees provide the technical expertise to innovate and support our platform offerings and programs, and our customer support employees assist our learners and customers. Competition for these employees is intense. We may be unable to attract or retain these key employees that are critical to our success, resulting in harm to our relationships with learners, customers, and educator partners, loss of expertise or know-how, and unanticipated recruitment and training costs.
In addition, any changes to our organizational or compensation structure or our workplace culture may be negatively perceived by current or prospective employees and may result in attrition or cause difficulty in the recruiting process. We may periodically implement business strategies that impact our employees, including changes to our organizational structure or workforce adjustments, such as the expense reduction initiative announced in October 2024 (refer to Note 14, “Restructuring Related Charges”, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). Workforce reductions or restructurings could have an adverse effect on our business, including lowering employee morale, harming our reputation as an employer making it difficult to retain and attract talent, losing key employees targeted for retention, and hindering our ability to meet operational targets due to loss of key employees. To the extent that our compensation and benefits programs are not viewed as competitive, our workplace culture does not resonate, or changes in our workforce or other initiatives are not viewed favorably, our ability to attract, retain, and motivate employees can be weakened, which could harm our operating results.
We may need additional capital in the future to pursue our business objectives. Additional capital may not be available on favorable terms, or at all, which could compromise our ability to maintain and grow our business.
We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to meet our minimum anticipated cash requirements for at least the next 12 months. We may, however, need to raise additional funds to respond to business challenges or opportunities, expand our business through acquisitions, accelerate our growth, develop new offerings, or enhance our platform. If we seek to raise additional capital, it may not be available on favorable terms or may not be available at all. In addition, if we seek debt financing, we may be subject to onerous terms and restrictive covenants. Lack of sufficient capital resources could significantly limit our ability to manage our business and to take advantage of business and strategic opportunities. Further, any additional capital raised through the sale of equity or issuance of debt securities with an equity component would dilute our existing stockholders. If adequate additional funds are not available if and when needed, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate material parts of our business strategy.
If we fail to successfully or appropriately balance longer-term growth and short-term results, our results of operations could be negatively impacted, including in the near term.
We believe our long-term value as a company will be greater if we effectively balance our longer-term growth and short-term results. As a result, our results of operations may be negatively impacted in the near term relative to a strategy solely focused on maximizing short-term profitability. Significant expenditures on sales and marketing efforts, as well as research and development efforts to enhance our platform and offerings, may not ultimately grow our business or lead to expected long-term results. If our strategy does not lead to expected growth or if we are ultimately unable to achieve results of operations at the levels expected by securities analysts and investors, our stock price would likely decline.
Our results of operations could be adversely affected by natural disasters, public health crises, political crises, geopolitical crises, or other catastrophic events.
Our business and operations could be materially and adversely affected in the event of earthquakes, floods, fires, telecommunications failures, blackouts or other power losses, break-ins, acts of terrorism, an outbreak of hostilities, political or geopolitical crises, such as the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, inclement weather, public health crises, pandemics, epidemics, or other catastrophic events.
For example, the uncertain nature, magnitude, and duration of hostilities stemming from Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine or conflicts in the Middle East, including the potential effects of sanctions and retaliatory cyberattacks on the world economy and markets, have contributed to increased market volatility and uncertainty, and may impact our customers’ intent or ability to pay for services, which could negatively impact our results of operations. The Israel-Hamas war has resulted in significant military activity in the Middle East, which may further escalate regional instability and could disrupt our operations and the business of our significant customers, educator partners, and learners in the Middle East and North Africa regions, which could negatively impact our results of operations. The continued turmoil in Ukraine and the Middle East could have a depressing effect on the global economy, which could dampen our business activity and reduce the demand for our online learning solutions.
In addition, pandemics or other public health crises could impact our business, key metrics, and results of operations. The emergence of a widespread health crisis could adversely impact our business if our employees, our educator partners’, or our third-party service providers’ employees become ill and are unable to perform their duties, and our operations, internet, or mobile networks, or the operations of one or more of our third-party service providers, is impacted. In addition, in the event of another widespread public health crisis, we may experience an adverse impact to our business and our stock price as a result of the crisis’ impact on the global economy and financial markets, including inflation or recession. More generally, a public health crisis or other catastrophic event could adversely affect economies and financial markets and lead to an economic downturn, which could harm our business, financial condition, and operating results.
Further, our headquarters is located near San Francisco, California, an earthquake-sensitive area and one that has been increasingly vulnerable to wildfires and floods, and damage to or total destruction resulting from such catastrophic events may disrupt our business operations, which may not be covered by insurance. If floods, earthquakes, fire, inclement weather including extreme rain, wind, heat, or cold, or other accidents were to occur and cause damage to our properties or other locations from which our employees are working, or if our operations or the operations of our service providers were interrupted by telecommunications failures, blackouts, acts of terrorism, outbreaks of hostilities, political or geopolitical crises, or public health crises, our results of operations would suffer, especially if such events were to occur during peak periods. We may not be able to effectively shift our operations due to disruptions arising from the occurrence of such events, and our business could be affected adversely as a result.
To the extent that any catastrophic event adversely affects our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows, it may also heighten many of the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section.
Our metrics and market estimates used to evaluate our performance are subject to inherent challenges in measurement, and real or perceived inaccuracies in those estimates may harm our reputation and negatively affect our business.
The metrics we use to evaluate our growth, measure our performance, and make strategic decisions are calculated using internal company data and have not been validated by a third party. Our metrics and market estimates may differ from estimates published by third parties or from similarly titled metrics of our competitors or peers due to differences in methodology or the assumptions on which we rely. Additionally, metrics and forecasts relating to the size and expected growth of our addressable market may prove to be inaccurate. Even if the markets in which we compete meet the size estimates and growth we have forecasted, our business could fail to grow at similar rates, if at all. If securities analysts or investors do not consider our metrics or our market estimates to be accurate representations of our business, or if we discover material inaccuracies in such estimates, then our stock price could decline, our reputation and brand could be harmed, and our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from customers, educator partners, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders with respect to our environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) practices may impose additional costs on us, expose us to new or additional risks, or harm our reputation.
Companies are facing increasing scrutiny from customers, partners, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders related to their ESG practices and disclosures. Investor advocacy groups, investment funds, and influential investors are also increasingly focused on these practices, especially as they relate to the environment, health and safety, diversity, labor conditions, and human rights. ESG-related compliance costs could result in increases to our overall operational costs. Failure to adapt to or comply with regulatory requirements or investor, employee, or stakeholder expectations and standards could negatively impact our reputation, ability to do business with certain educator partners, and our stock price.
New government regulations could also result in new or more stringent forms of ESG oversight and expanding mandatory and voluntary reporting, diligence, and disclosure. Collecting, measuring, and reporting ESG information and metrics can be costly, difficult and time consuming, and can present numerous operational, reputational, financial, legal, and other risks, any of which could have a material impact on us, including on our reputation and stock price. Inadequate processes to collect and review this information prior to disclosure could subject us to potential liability related to such information. Furthermore, the U.S. federal government and several U.S. states have enacted or proposed “anti-ESG” policies or legislation. While these policies and related legislation are generally targeted to investment advisory firms and mutual funds, if these investors viewed our ESG practices as contradicting such “anti-ESG” policies, such investors may not invest in the Company, and it could negatively affect our stock price.
Our current ESG disclosures, including the metrics we set as a PBC and any other standards we may set for ourselves, or a failure to meet these metrics or standards, may influence our reputation and the value of our brand. For example, we have elected to publicly share certain information about our ESG initiatives and information, and our commitment to the recruitment, engagement, and retention of a diverse workforce. Our business may face increased scrutiny related to these activities, including from the investment community, and our failure to achieve progress in these areas on a timely basis, or at all, could impact our ability to hire and retain employees, increase our educator partner base, reelect our Board, or attract and retain certain types of investors, which could adversely affect our reputation, business, and financial performance.
Climate change may have an adverse impact on our business.
Risks related to climate change may have an adverse impact on our business and those of our customers, educator partners, and learners in the longer term. Any of our primary locations and the locations of our customers, educator partners, and learners may be vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change. Furthermore, it is more difficult to mitigate the impact of these events on our employees while they work from home. Changing market dynamics, global policy developments, and the increasing frequency and impact of extreme weather events on critical infrastructure have the potential to disrupt our business and the business of our customers, educator partners, and learners, and may cause us to experience higher attrition, losses, and additional costs to maintain our operations. Further, the effects of climate change may negatively impact regional and local economic activity, which could lead to an adverse effect on our customers, educator partners, and learners and impact the communities in which we operate. Overall, climate change, its effects, and the resulting unknown impact could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our workforce primarily operates on a remote basis, which could have a negative impact on the execution of our business plans and operations and create productivity, connectivity, and oversight challenges.
We allow most employees to work remotely on an ongoing basis. This policy could have a negative impact on the execution of our business plans and operations and create productivity, connectivity, and oversight challenges. For example, if a natural disaster, power outage, connectivity issue, or other event occurred that impacted our employees’ ability to work remotely, it may be difficult for us to continue components of our business for a period of time. Remote working may also result in consumer privacy, IT security, and fraud vulnerabilities, which, if exploited, could result in significant recovery costs and harm to our reputation. Operating in a predominantly remote work environment and providing and maintaining the operational infrastructure necessary to support a remote work environment also present significant challenges of managing, integrating, developing, training, and motivating our global workforce, transitioning knowledge, maintaining our company culture, and employee engagement and productivity. As a result, our culture, information technology requirements, cybersecurity risk, and business operations could be adversely affected.
Risks Related to Regulatory Matters and Litigation
Laws and regulations can have a negative impact on our business.
We are subject to complex and evolving laws and regulations worldwide that differ among jurisdictions and affect our operations in areas including, but not limited to: higher education; IP ownership and infringement; tax; import and export requirements; anti-corruption; data privacy requirements; consumer protection; employment and labor laws; and accounting and financial reporting. Compliance with such requirements can be onerous and expensive and may otherwise impact our business operations negatively. For example, unfavorable legal or regulatory developments related to higher education, AI, or privacy may adversely impact our platform, strategy, business, or operations. Legislative or regulatory developments may also adversely impact our current and prospective learners, customers, or educator partners, which may in turn have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and growth prospects.
In addition, our policies, controls, and procedures designed to comply with applicable laws cannot provide assurance that our employees, contractors, or agents will not violate such laws or our policies. Violations of these laws and regulations can result in fines; criminal sanctions against us, our officers, or our employees; prohibitions on the conduct of our business; and damage to our reputation. The education technology industry is subject to media, political, and regulatory scrutiny, which can increase our exposure to regulatory investigations, legal actions, penalties, or reputational harm.
If our educator partners fail to comply with international, federal, and state education laws and regulations, including any applicable state authorizations for their programs, it could harm our business and reputation.
Higher education is heavily regulated in the U.S. and most international jurisdictions. Numerous U.S. states require education providers to be licensed or authorized in such state simply to enroll in-state learners into an online education program or to conduct related activities such as marketing. If any of our educator partners were found to be non-compliant with any of the laws, regulations, standards, or policies related to state authorization, the educator partner could lose its ability to operate in certain states. If such non-compliance extended to a material contingent of our educator partners, and they lost the ability to operate in certain states, our revenue could decline.
Additionally, the vast majority of our U.S.-based university partners participate in the federal student financial assistance programs under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (respectively, “Title IV” and “HEA”), and are subject to extensive regulation by the U.S. Department of Education (“DOE”), as well as various state agencies, licensing boards, and accrediting agencies. To participate in the Title IV programs, an institution must receive and maintain authorization by the appropriate state education agencies, be accredited by a DOE-recognized accrediting agency, and be certified by the DOE as an eligible institution.
The regulations, standards, and policies of our university partners’ regulators are complex, change frequently, and are often subject to differing interpretations. Changes in, or new interpretations of, applicable laws, regulations, or standards could compromise our university partners’ accreditation, authorization to offer online learning in various states or countries, permissible activities, or access to federal funds under the Title IV programs. We cannot predict with certainty how the requirements applicable to our university partners will be interpreted, including in the case of new laws or regulations for which no, or insufficient, interpretative guidance exists, or whether our university partners will be able to comply with these requirements in the future. Some regulations were designed to regulate in-person correspondence or other types of learning experiences not offered online and may be difficult to interpret or apply to the types of programs offered by our university partners on our platform. In addition, there is no assurance that degrees or certifications earned in one jurisdiction will be recognized as valid or sufficient in other jurisdictions, including internationally. This could affect employment prospects, eligibility for advanced degrees, and other opportunities. Our international university partners are subject to similarly extensive legislation, regulation, and oversight.
Our future growth could be impaired if we, or our educator partners, fail to obtain timely approval from applicable regulatory agencies to offer new programs, make substantive changes to existing programs, or expand their programs into or within certain jurisdictions.
Our U.S.-based university partners are required to obtain the appropriate approvals from the DOE and applicable state and accrediting regulatory agencies for new programs, which may be conditioned, delayed, or denied in a manner that could impair our future growth. Similar approvals and reviews may be required for programs from our educator partners based outside of the U.S., and for them to offer programs in other countries. Education regulatory agencies may experience increases in the volume of requests for approvals as a result of new distance learning programs and adjustments to new regulations. Any such increases in volume could result in delays to various approvals our educator partners request, and any such delays could in turn delay the timing of our ability to generate revenue from their programs.
Our educator partners, both U.S. and international, may be required to be authorized in certain states to offer online programs, engage in advertising or recruiting and operate externships, internships, technical training, or other forms of field experience, depending on state and international laws. Although many of our programs are offered by U.S.-based higher education institutions that hold such authorizations or participate in an appropriate state reciprocity agreement, such as the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (“SARA”), other educator partners are not traditional education institutions or operate outside of the U.S. and do not hold such state authorizations. Further, even U.S.-based higher education institutions could lose a necessary authorization either because it lapses or is revoked by a state agency. Such educator partners could also lack, or lose, the ability to participate in a reciprocity agreement that provides the basis for their authorization in multiple states. For example, California higher education institutions currently do not participate in SARA. Unless we choose to seek authorization in our own name, which we have not done to date, the loss of or failure by an educator partner to obtain a necessary state authorization would, among other things, limit our ability to deliver content to learners in that state, either for degree or non-degree programs, render the educator partner and its learners in that state ineligible to participate in Title IV or other financial aid programs, diminish the attractiveness of the educator partner’s programs, and ultimately compromise our ability to generate revenue. The DOE is currently considering changes to its state authorization regulation, which would require substantial revision of SARA to meet Title IV requirements. Adoption of these changes could result in our educator partners not being authorized in SARA states pending such revisions, or could result in some states ending their participation in SARA. In addition, if we or any of our educator partners fail to comply with any state agency’s rules, regulations, or standards beyond authorizations, the state agency could limit the ability of the educator partner to offer programs in that state or limit our ability to perform our contractual obligations to our educator partner in that state.
We, or our educator partners, may also be required to obtain appropriate approvals under international education laws and regulations. For example, a recent Indian regulation relating to online higher education requires, among other things, that learning platforms utilized by Indian universities to offer online degrees be approved by a technical committee of the Indian regulator. Seeking such approval could be a complex and time-consuming process, since the requirement is new, and as such there is no certainty as to the timing and standard of review for international platforms, or even whether international platforms are permitted to apply for approval. In addition, we may lack the knowledge and resources to successfully pursue an application without the support of one or more of our Indian university partners. International education laws and regulations may prohibit or restrict the delivery of online education by extraterritorial entities, or local policies or practice may favor local providers. India’s Ministry of Education recently announced its intent to launch its first digital university in 2023, the National Digital University, which would allow students to accumulate and combine credits from different higher education institutions. Such a program may negatively impact our ability to effectively expand our Degrees business in India.
If we, or our educator partners, fail to obtain or maintain necessary authorizations or violate applicable laws and regulations, learners in relevant programs could be adversely affected, we could lose our ability to operate in that state or international market, and our ability to generate revenue would be adversely affected.
If our educator partners fail to maintain institutional or programmatic accreditation for their programs, our revenue could be materially adversely affected.
The loss or suspension of an educator partner’s accreditation or other adverse action by their institutional accreditor would render the institution or its program ineligible to participate in Title IV programs or similar government funding programs that may be in place and available to our Degrees students based in and outside of the U.S. This loss, suspension, or other adverse action could prevent the educator partner from offering certain educational programs, could prevent our Degrees students from accessing such funding programs, and could make it impossible for the graduates of the educator partner’s program to practice the profession for which they trained. If any of these results occur, it could hurt our ability to generate revenue from that program.
Our activities are subject to international, federal, and state education accessibility, consumer protection laws and regulations, and other requirements.
As a service provider to higher education institutions both in the U.S. and internationally, either directly or indirectly through our arrangements with educator partners, we are required to comply with certain education laws and regulations.
Our platform is also subject to various requirements relating to accessibility for learners with disabilities. Certain requirements of Title II and Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act apply to us and to our public and private university partners, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1974 (the “Rehabilitation Act”) applies to our educator partners that receive federal funding, and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, which sets accessibility standards for websites of federal departments and agencies, applies to certain of our government customers. Further, in the absence of definitive federal rulemaking, the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2, a set of recommendations and technical standards for making websites accessible to individuals with disabilities published by the World Wide Web Consortium, have become the effective standard for learner-facing aspects of our platform. We may not be successful in ensuring that our offerings and services meet these changing statutory and regulatory requirements, which could make our solutions less attractive to our educator partners, learners, and customers. This could also subject us to third-party lawsuits, regulatory fines, or other action or liability. As such, we expect to incur ongoing costs of compliance.
Our subscription plans charge learners on a recurring basis, and as a result, we must comply with complex international, federal, and state laws and regulations related to automatic renewal, unfair competition, and false advertising. These laws, among other things, require us to make specific disclosures in clear and conspicuous ways when a learner purchases a subscription, and obtain the learner’s affirmative, express consent to the recurring charges, as well as provide learners with refunds easily and promptly. The penalties for failing to comply with these requirements can be severe, including rendering the subscription contract null and void, and allowing the consumer to treat any services provided under such a contract as a gift, and any failure to comply with these requirements may constitute violations of more general consumer protection laws, which could subject us to third-party lawsuits, regulatory fines, or other action or liability, and we expect to incur ongoing compliance costs.
Additionally, we have made, and will continue to make, certain contractual commitments to our educator partners regarding legal and regulatory compliance, and failure to comply could result in breach of contract and indemnification claims and could cause damage to our reputation and impair our ability to grow our business and achieve profitability.
Changes in spending policies or budget priorities for government funding of academic institutions and other education providers, could result in adverse legislation or regulatory action.
Our educator partners include academic institutions and other education providers, many of which depend substantially on government funding. Any general decrease, delay, or change in governmental funding at the national or local level for academic institutions and other education providers could cause our current and potential educator partners to reduce their use of our platform, or delay content development for our platform, any of which could cause us to lose learners, customers, and revenue. For example, a government shutdown as a result of failure to enact funding legislation for the government’s next fiscal year could negatively impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
In the U.S., the increased scrutiny, compliance and results-based accountability initiatives in the education sector, as well as ongoing and potential future policy differences in Congress regarding spending levels, the federal student loan program, and the DOE organization, could lead to significant changes in connection with the pending reauthorization of the HEA and the associated negotiated rulemaking or otherwise. These changes may place additional regulatory burdens on postsecondary schools participating in the Title IV programs generally, and specific changes may be targeted at companies like us that serve higher education within the U.S. The adoption of any laws or regulations that limit our ability to provide our bundled services to our educator partners could compromise our ability to offer their programs or make our solutions less attractive to them. Congress could also enact laws or regulations that require us to modify our practices in ways that could increase our costs or otherwise adversely impact our business.
DOE regulatory activities and initiatives may have similar consequences for our business even in the absence of congressional action. No assurances can be given as to how any new rules may affect our business. In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (“Loper Bright”) in June 2024, overturning the “Chevron doctrine” that provided for judicial deference to federal agency interpretations of statutes, has resulted in regulatory uncertainty and may cause industry uncertainty, increasing the risk of legal challenges to current DOE rules, policies, and guidance, and the potential for future enactment of congressional legislation.
Changes to governmental funding and priorities, as well as changes in legislation or regulations, with respect to educational programs may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
While our Degrees business model is designed to align with guidance from a DOE “Dear Colleague” Letter, such guidance is not codified by statute or regulation and may be subject to change.
Each institution that participates in Title IV programs agrees, as a condition of its eligibility to participate in those programs, that it will not “provide any commission, bonus, or other incentive payment based in any part, directly or indirectly, upon success in securing enrollments or the award of financial aid, to any person or entity who is engaged in any student recruitment or admission activity, or in making decisions regarding the award of Title IV program funds.” The vast majority of our U.S.-based university partners, and some of our non-U.S. university partners, participate in the Title IV programs. Although this rule, referred to as the incentive compensation rule, generally prohibits entities or individuals from receiving incentive-based compensation payments for the successful recruitment, admission, or enrollment of learners, the DOE provided clarifying guidance in March 2011 interpreting the incentive compensation rule as permitting tuition revenue-sharing arrangements known as the “bundled services exception.” Our current business model relies heavily on the bundled services exception to enter into tuition revenue-sharing agreements with our Title IV participating university partners.
The DCL issued by the DOE on March 17, 2011, sets forth the guidance of the DOE regarding various regulations that were implemented around that time. The DCL affirms that “[t]he Department generally views payment based on the amount of tuition generated as an indirect payment of incentive compensation based on success in recruitment and therefore a prohibited basis upon which to measure the value of the services provided.” The DCL, however, in Example 2-B, clarified an important exception to this prohibition for a business model that complies with the bundled services exception: “A third party that is not affiliated with the institution it serves and is not affiliated with any other institution that provides educational services, which third party provides bundled services to the institution including marketing, enrollment application assistance, recruitment services, course support for online delivery of courses, the provision of technology, placement services for internships, or student career counseling, may receive from an institution an amount based on tuition generated for the institution by the third-party’s activities for all bundled services that are offered and provided collectively, as long as the third party does not make prohibited compensation payments to its employees, and the institution does not pay the third party separately for student recruitment services provided by the entity.”
The DCL guidance indicates that an arrangement that complies with Example 2-B will be deemed to be in compliance with the incentive compensation provisions of the HEA and the DOE’s regulations. Our business model and contractual arrangements with our U.S.-based university partners are designed to follow Example 2-B in the DCL. However, the inherent ambiguity in the DCL and the incentive compensation rule creates the risk that DOE or a court, including, notably, in the context of a “whistleblower” claim under the federal False Claims Act, could disagree with that interpretation. If the DOE or a court determined that our business model or even the practices of a subcontractor did not meet the bundled services exception, we could have contractual obligations to our Title IV participating university partners, such as indemnifying an educator partner from private claims or government investigations or demands for repayment of Title IV program funds. Even if such claims are without merit, they could cause reputational harm, cause us to incur significant defense costs, result in the termination of our Title IV participating university partner agreements, and negatively impact our ability to enter into new agreements.
Further, because the bundled services exception was promulgated by agency guidance through the DCL and is not codified by statute or regulation, there is risk that the exception could be altered or removed without prior notice, public comment period, or other administrative procedural requirements that accompany formal agency rulemaking. The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the Loper Bright case may also result in legal challenges to the DCL or otherwise result in future changes to the bundled services exception. The DCL has been criticized by commentators and lawmakers, including in a June 2022 report by the U.S. House Committee on Appropriations, which urged the DOE to rescind the guidance. On February 15, 2023, the DOE announced that it is reviewing its DCL guidance on incentive compensation compliance. The DOE has not announced the results of this review. If the guidance is rescinded or amended, such changes may materially and adversely impact our business and operations as we may need to alter or replace the current tuition revenue-sharing models in our agreements with Title IV participating university partners.
In addition, the legal weight the DCL would carry in litigation over the propriety of any specific compensation arrangements under the HEA or the incentive compensation rule is uncertain.
We can offer no assurances as to whether the exception in the DCL would be upheld by a court or how it would be interpreted. The revision, removal, or invalidation of the bundled services exception by Congress, the DOE, or a court, whether in an action involving our Company or our university partners, or in an action that does not involve us, could require us to change our business model and renegotiate the terms of our university partner agreements and could compromise our ability to generate revenue, thereby potentially materially and adversely impacting our business and operations.
State legislation could negatively affect our Degrees business model.
Effective July 1, 2024, a newly enacted Minnesota law prohibits their public universities from entering into revenue share arrangements to procure marketing and recruiting services in support of their online programs. The Minnesota law also mandates institutional approval for OPM contracts, sets strict reporting and marketing guidelines, and includes a temporary exemption for certain contracts modified before July 1, 2023. In the past, other states, such as California, Florida, and New Jersey, have considered similar legislation to Minnesota, but none have been enacted to date. Our current Degrees business model may be negatively affected by such state legislation, and we may be required to make changes to our model and renegotiate the terms of our university partner agreements with public universities located in such states. If we are unable to comply with the terms of such state legislation or negotiate terms with public universities acceptable under such state legislation, we may have to terminate our Degrees business model in those states, and our ability to generate revenue may be adversely affected.
If we were to become classified as a third-party service (“TPS”) under the HEA, we, and our Title IV participating university partners, would be subject to new compliance requirements, which could adversely impact our business and operations.
On February 15, 2023, the DOE issued “Requirements and Responsibilities for Third-Party Servicers and Institutions” (“GEN-23-03”). Prior to GEN-23-03 and based on longstanding DOE policy, only companies that assisted in financial aid administration functions were classified as a TPS. GEN-23-03 expanded the scope of TPS status to include companies that provide (among other things) recruiting services to Title IV participating universities. A Title IV participating university that engages a TPS must include specific provisions in the TPS contract and must report each TPS contract to the DOE. A company classified as a TPS falls under direct DOE oversight, is jointly and severally liable with the university for any HEA violations, and must undergo an annual audit. Subsequent to the receipt of numerous comments related to GEN-23-03 and a legal challenge, the DOE formally rescinded GEN-23-03. However, the DOE announced it intends to undergo negotiated rulemaking on TPS. If in the future we are considered a TPS to those Title IV participating university partners who receive recruiting services from us, those university partners could hesitate to engage us for recruiting services to avoid compliance obligations, and we would incur additional expense in complying with TPS requirements, which could materially and adversely impact our business and operations.
If we violate the misrepresentation rule, or similar federal and state regulatory requirements, we could face fines, sanctions, and other liabilities.
Under our contracts with U.S.-based university partners, we are required to comply with other regulations promulgated by the DOE and comparable state laws that affect our marketing activities, including the misrepresentation rule. The misrepresentation rule is broad in scope and applies to statements our employees or agents may make about the nature of an educator partner’s program, their financial charges, or the employability of their program graduates. A violation of this rule or other federal or state regulations applicable to our marketing activities by an employee or agent performing services for educator partners could damage our reputation, result in the termination of educator partner agreements, require us to pay fines or other monetary penalties, injunctions or other remedies and require us to pay the fees associated with indemnifying an educator partner from private claims or government investigations. Any such outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We are required to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (“FERPA”) for certain of our offerings, and failure to do so could harm our reputation and negatively affect our business.
FERPA generally prohibits an institution of higher education from disclosing personally identifiable information from a learner’s education records without the learner’s consent. Certain U.S.-based university degree and certificate partners and Coursera for Campus customers and their learners disclose to us certain information that originates from or composes a learner education record under FERPA. Through our contracts to provide services to these institutions, we are indirectly subject to FERPA. If we violate FERPA, it could result in a material breach of our agreements with one or more of our educator partners and Coursera for Campus customers, which could harm our reputation. Further, in the event that we disclose learner information in violation of FERPA, the DOE could require an educator partner to suspend our access to their learner information for at least five years.
We could face liability, or our reputation might be harmed, as a result of the activities of our customers, educator partners, or learners for content on or accessible through our platform.
In some instances, various articles or other third-party content may be posted to our platform by customers, educator partners, or learners. The laws governing the fair use of these third-party materials are imprecise and adjudicated on a case-by-case basis, which makes it challenging to adopt and implement appropriately balanced institutional policies governing these practices. As a result, we could incur liability to third parties for the unauthorized duplication, distribution, or other use of this material. In addition, third parties may allege misappropriation, plagiarism, or similar claims related to content appearing on our platform. Any such claims, including claims of defamation, disparagement, negligence, breach of warranty, misappropriation, or personal harm, could subject us to costly litigation and impose a significant strain on our financial resources and management personnel, regardless of whether the claims have merit. Our various liability insurance coverages may not cover potential claims of this type adequately or at all, and we may be required to, or may choose to, alter or cease our uses of such material, which may include changing or removing content or altering the functionality of our platform, or be required to pay monetary damages. Furthermore, if inappropriate, offensive, or unlawful content is posted on our platform by customers, educator partners, or learners, it could harm our reputation, lead to a loss of users or partners, and potentially expose us to legal liability.
While we rely on a variety of statutory and common-law frameworks and defenses, including those provided by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (“DMCA”), the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (“CDA”), the fair-use doctrine in the U.S., as well as the Digital Services Act (“DSA”), the Digital Markets Act (“DMA”) and the e-Commerce Directive in the European Union (“EU”), differences between statutes, limitations on immunity, requirements to maintain immunity, and moderation efforts in the many jurisdictions in which we operate may affect our ability to rely on these frameworks and defenses, or create uncertainty regarding liability for information or content uploaded by customers, educator partners, or learners or otherwise contributed by third-parties to our platform. For example, while Section 230 of the CDA provides certain legal protections to online platforms from litigation related to content posted by users of their platforms, Section 230 has faced increasing litigation challenges and legislative proposals regarding the scope of its protection. These actions may increase the uncertainty of litigation risk for online platforms such as ours. Furthermore, Article 17 of the EU Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market affords copyright owners some enforcement rights that may conflict with U.S. safe harbor protections afforded to us under the DMCA. The DSA and DMA have gone into effect in the EU, updating the rules surrounding illegal content and requiring reports on the moderation of content. Moreover, regulators in the U.S. and in other countries in which we operate may introduce new regulatory regimes that increase potential liability for information or content available on our platform, or which impose additional obligations to monitor such information or content, which could increase our costs.
We are subject to government export and import controls and anti-corruption laws and regulations that could impair our ability to compete in international markets and subject us to liability if we are not in compliance with applicable laws.
Our business activities are subject to various restrictions under U.S. export and import and similar laws and regulations, including the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Export Administration Regulations and various economic and trade sanctions regulations administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Controls. The U.S. export control laws and U.S. economic sanctions laws include restrictions or prohibitions on the purchase or sale of certain technology, goods, and services to U.S. embargoed or sanctioned countries, governments, persons, and entities. In addition, various countries regulate the import of certain technology and have enacted or could enact laws that could limit our ability to provide learners and customers access to our platform or could limit our learners’ and customers’ ability to access or use our services in those countries.
Although we take precautions to prevent our platform from being provided in violation of such laws, our platform could be provided inadvertently in violation of such laws, despite the precautions we take. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we and certain of our employees could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, including the possible loss of export privileges and fines. We may also be adversely affected through penalties, reputational harm, loss of access to certain markets, or otherwise. In addition, various countries regulate the import and export of certain encryption and other technology, including import and export permitting and licensing requirements, and have enacted laws that could limit our ability to distribute our platform or could limit our learners’ ability to access our platform in those countries. Changes in our platform, or changes in export and import regulations, such as the increase of sanctions on Russian parties, and discretionary decisions to suspend activities in Russia, may prevent our international learners from utilizing our platform or, in some cases, prevent the export or import of our platform to certain countries, governments, or persons altogether. Any change in export or import regulations, economic sanctions, or related legislation or changes in the countries, governments, persons, or technologies targeted by such regulations, could result in decreased use of our platform by, or in our decreased ability to export or sell subscriptions to our platform to, existing or potential learners internationally, or could restrict our ability to acquire technology, services, or content. Any decreased use of our platform or limitation on our ability to export or sell our platform would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial results.
We are also subject to various domestic and international anti-corruption laws, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act, as well as other similar anti-bribery, anti-kickback laws, and anti-money laundering regulations. These laws and regulations generally prohibit companies, their employees, and their intermediaries from authorizing, offering, providing, and accepting improper payments or benefits for improper purposes. These laws also require that we keep accurate books and records and maintain compliance procedures designed to prevent any such actions. Although we take precautions to prevent violations of these laws and regulations, our exposure to violations increases as our international presence expands and as we increase sales and operations in foreign jurisdictions.
We may become involved in claims, lawsuits, government investigations, and other proceedings that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
From time to time, we may be subject to claims, lawsuits, government investigations, arbitrations, and other proceedings including IP, privacy, commercial, employment, class action, securities, whistleblower, accessibility, advertising and marketing, consumer protection, and other litigation and claims, and government and other regulatory investigations and proceedings. For example, we were party to a class action lawsuit alleging certain violations of the Video Privacy Protection Act (“VPPA”) and have faced arbitration demands for alleged breach of the VPPA and other privacy laws. Additional allegations or litigation may arise against us in the future, including related to the VPPA and other privacy and consumer protection laws.
Such matters can be time-consuming, divert management’s attention and resources, cause us to incur significant expenses or liability, or require us to change our business practices. In addition, litigation expense and the timing of these expenses from period to period are difficult to estimate, subject to change, and could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Because of the potential risks, expenses, and uncertainties of litigation, we may, from time to time, settle disputes, even where we have meritorious claims or defenses, by agreeing to settlement agreements. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Refer to Note 9, “Commitments and Contingencies”, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
Risks Related to Privacy, Cybersecurity, and Infrastructure
If sensitive information about our learners, customers, educator partners, or their employees is disclosed, or if we, or our third-party providers, are subject to cyberattacks, use of our platform could be curtailed, we may be exposed to liability, and our reputation would suffer.
Although we do not directly collect, transmit, and store financial information, such as credit cards and other payment information, except in very limited circumstances related to Enterprise customers, we utilize third-party payment processors who provide these services on our behalf. We also collect and store certain personal data provided by our customers, educator partners, learners, and potential learners, such as names, email addresses, and other data pertaining to their activity on our platform. The collection, transmission, and storage of such information is subject to stringent legal and regulatory obligations. Some of our third-party service providers, such as identity verification and payment processing providers, also regularly have access to personal data. In an effort to protect sensitive information, we rely on a variety of security measures, including encryption and authentication technology licensed from third parties. However, advances in computer capabilities, increasingly sophisticated tools and methods used by hackers and cyberterrorists, new discoveries in the field of cryptography, or other developments may result in our failure or inability to adequately protect sensitive information. In addition, there may be scamming or phishing attempts, such as impersonating our personnel, our customers’ personnel, or our educator partners’ personnel, in an effort to obtain personal information from our learners or otherwise make inappropriate use of our platform, which could expose us to liability, reduce learner, customer, and educator partner satisfaction with our platform, or damage our reputation. For example, we have had several instances of users impersonating professors and inviting learners to off-platform forums in an effort to entice the learners to buy unrelated educational content.
Our platform is vulnerable to power outages, telecommunications failures, and catastrophic events, as well as computer viruses, worms, malicious code, break-ins, phishing attacks, denial-of-service attacks, ransomware, and other cyberattacks. Any of these incidents could lead to interruptions or shutdowns of our platform, loss of data, or unauthorized disclosure of personal data or other sensitive information. Cyberattacks could also result in the theft of our IP. As we gain greater global visibility, we may face a higher risk of being targeted by cyberattacks. Advances in computer capabilities, new technological discoveries, or other developments may result in cyberattacks becoming more sophisticated and more difficult to detect.
Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with our privacy policies, our privacy or data protection obligations to learners or other third parties, or our privacy or data protection legal obligations, or any compromise of security that results in the unauthorized access, release, use, or transfer of sensitive information, which may include personal data or other data, may result in government enforcement actions, litigation, or public statements against us by consumer advocacy groups or others and could cause learners to lose trust in us, which could have an adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, under the terms of our agreements with educator partners and customers, and our primary legal obligations, we are responsible for the costs of investigating and disclosing data breaches. In addition to costs associated with investigating and fully disclosing a data breach in such instances, we could be subject to substantial costs to remedy the data breach, substantial monetary fines, or private claims by affected parties, and our reputation would likely be harmed.
Further, if we, or our third-party service providers, experience security breaches that result in platform performance or availability problems or the loss or unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information, our reputation and ability to maintain existing or attract new, learners, customers, and educator partners could be materially adversely affected. Learners could decline to enroll or stay enrolled in our educator partners’ programs, customers could terminate our agreements or stop paying for our services, and educator partners could scale back their programs or elect to not renew their agreements. We could be subject to third-party lawsuits, regulatory fines, or other action or liability. Further, any reputational damage resulting from breach of our security measures could create distrust of our Company by prospective learners, customers, or educator partners.
We, and our third-party service providers, may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate or prevent all such cyberattacks. Moreover, techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to systems change frequently and may not be known until launched against us or our third-party service providers. Security breaches can also occur as a result of non-technical issues, including intentional or inadvertent breaches by our employees or our third-party service providers’ employees or theft or loss of devices.
We expect to incur ongoing costs associated with the detection and prevention of data security breaches and other security-related incidents. We may incur additional costs in the event of a data security breach or other security-related incident. Any actual or perceived compromise of our systems or data security measures or those of third parties with whom we do business, or any failure to prevent or mitigate the loss of personal or other confidential information and delays in detecting or providing notice of any such compromise or loss could disrupt our operations, harm the perception of our security measures, damage our reputation, cause some learners or educator partners to decrease or stop their use of our platform or relationships with us, and could subject us to litigation, government action, increased transaction fees, regulatory fines or penalties, or other additional costs and liabilities that could harm our business, financial condition, and operating results.
We cannot be certain that our insurance coverage will cover or be adequate for data handling or data security liabilities or loss of revenue if our platform is unavailable for any reason, that insurance will continue to be available to us on economically reasonable terms, or at all, or that any insurer will not deny coverage as to any future claim. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceed available insurance coverage or the occurrence of changes in our insurance policies, including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or coinsurance requirements, could have a material and adverse effect on our business, including our financial condition, operating results, and reputation.
Disruption to or failures of our platform could result in our educator partners and learners becoming dissatisfied with our platform and could harm our reputation.
The performance and reliability of our platform and the underlying technology are critical to our operations, reputation, and ability to attract and retain learners, customers, and educator partners. We must provide our learners with the ability to access our platform on a frequent and reliable basis, and our educator partners rely on the availability of our platform to offer their content online. Our platform is complex and relies on cloud infrastructure provided by third parties, and may contain defects, errors, or vulnerabilities, or may not perform as contemplated. These errors, defects, disruptions, breaches, or other performance problems with our platform could damage our, or our educator partners’, reputations, decrease learner, customer, or educator partner satisfaction and retention, negatively impact our ability to attract new learners, customers, and educator partners, and could result in large indemnity payments to them for losses suffered or incurred in connection with any such defects or errors on our platform, or other liabilities relating to or arising from our platform. In addition, sustained or recurring disruptions in our platform or its underlying technology could adversely affect our, or our educator partners’, compliance with applicable regulations and accrediting body standards.
Further, if we fail to accurately predict the rate or timing of our platform growth, we may be required to incur significant additional costs to maintain reliability. We also depend on the development and maintenance of the internet infrastructure, including maintenance of reliable internet networks with the necessary speed, data capacity, and security. If we experience failures in our technology infrastructure or do not expand our technology infrastructure successfully, then our ability to attract and retain learners, customers, and educator partners, our growth prospects, and our business would suffer.
From time to time, we have experienced and expect to continue experiencing, interruptions, delays, and outages in service and availability due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, human or software errors, website hosting disruptions, capacity constraints, and lack of network connectivity in one or more regions, which could affect the availability of services on our platform and prevent or inhibit our learners’ ability to access or complete courses and programs on our platform. Our technology infrastructure is currently hosted in third-party data centers, and our platform and underlying technology is supported by multiple third-party providers. Any disruption in our third-parties’ services or any failure of our third-party service providers to handle the demands of our platform, could significantly harm our business and damage our reputation. We do not have control over their operations or their facilities, and these facilities may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from natural disasters, cybersecurity attacks, terrorist attacks, power outages, and similar events or acts of misconduct.
If we do not maintain the compatibility of our learning management platform with third-party applications that our customers use, our revenue will decline.
A number of our customers integrate our learning management platform with certain learning management systems or learning experience platforms using application programming interfaces for user management, usage reporting, and content listings, and we expect this number of customers to grow. The functionality and popularity of our platform depends, in part, on our ability to integrate our platform with third-party applications and software. Third-party application and software providers may change their features, restrict our access, or alter their usage terms in ways that could negatively affect us. Such changes could functionally limit or terminate our ability to use them in conjunction with our platform, which could negatively impact our offerings and harm our business. If we fail to integrate our platform with new third-party applications and software that our learners, customers, and educator partners utilize, we may not be able to offer the functionality that they need, which would negatively impact our ability to generate revenue and adversely impact our business.
Our payments system depends on third-party providers and is subject to evolving laws and regulations.
We rely on third-party payment processors to manage learner and certain customer payments on our platform. These third-party service providers perform essential services such as card processing, currency exchange, identity verification, and fraud analysis. If these service providers do not perform adequately, terminate their relationships with us, refuse to renew their agreements on commercially reasonable terms, or impose additional requirements, we may need to find alternate payment processors. We may not be able to secure similar terms or replace such payment processors in an acceptable timeframe. Further, the software and services provided by our third-party payment processors may not meet our expectations, contain errors or vulnerabilities, be compromised, experience outages, or such processors may impose additional authentication, validation, or other requirements. Any of these risks could cause us to lose our ability to accept online payments, conduct other payment transactions, or make it difficult for our customers to make payments to us, any of which could make our platform less convenient and attractive and harm our ability to attract and retain learners, customers, and educator partners. In addition, if these providers increase the fees they charge us, our operating expenses could increase.
Payment-related laws and regulations are complex and vary across different jurisdictions in the U.S. and globally, requiring us to spend significant time and effort to comply. Any failure or claim of our failure to comply, or any failure by our third-party service providers to comply, could cost us substantial resources, result in liabilities, or force us to stop offering certain third-party payment services. In addition, as we grow our international leaner and customer base, we believe we will need to accommodate more local payment methods. As we expand the availability of new payment methods in the future, we may become subject to additional regulations and compliance requirements.
Further, through our agreement with our third-party credit card processors, we are indirectly subject to payment card association operating rules and certification requirements, including the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard. We are also subject to rules governing electronic funds transfers. Any change in these rules and requirements could make it difficult or impossible for us to comply. If we fail to comply with these rules or requirements, we may be subject to additional fines and higher transaction fees and lose our ability to accept online payments, and our business and operating results could be adversely affected.
Our business depends to a significant degree on continued access to the internet and mobile networks.
Our learners, customers, and educators rely on access to the internet and mobile networks to access our platform. Internet service providers may choose to disrupt or degrade access to our platform or increase the cost of such access. Internet service providers or mobile network operators could also attempt to charge us for providing access to our platform. In January 2018, the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) released an order reclassifying broadband internet access as an information service, subject to certain provisions of Title I of the Communications Act. Among other things, the order eliminates rules adopted in 2015 that prohibited broadband providers from blocking, impairing, or degrading access to legal content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, or engaging in the practice of paid prioritization (e.g., the favoring of some lawful internet traffic over other traffic in exchange for higher payments). The order was contested and affirmed in federal court, and the parties declined to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. A number of states have also enacted or are considering legislation or executive actions that would regulate the conduct of broadband providers. Most recently, on January 2, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit struck down a rule by the FCC attempting to reclassify broadband as a regulated “telecommunications service” subject to the net neutrality rule. If the absence of net neutrality regulations leads to difficulties for our learners, customers, or educator partners to access our platform, we can face increased costs, lose existing learners, customers, and educator partners, face difficulties attracting new ones, and experience material and adverse impacts on our business and growth opportunities. Outside of the U.S., government regulation of the internet, including the idea of net neutrality, may be developing or non-existent. As a result, we could face discriminatory or anti-competitive practices that could impede our growth prospects, increase our costs, and harm our business.
If the mobile solutions available to our learners, customers, and educator partners are not effective, the use of our platform could decline.
Learners and customers have been increasingly accessing our platform through our mobile app. The smaller screen size and reduced functionality associated with some mobile devices may make the use of our platform more difficult or our customers and educator partners may believe that online learning through such mobile devices is not effective. Learners accessing our network primarily on mobile devices may not enroll in our content or programs as often as those accessing our platform through personal computers, which could result in less revenue for us. If we are not able to provide our customers and educator partners with the functionality to deliver a rewarding experience on mobile devices, their ability to attract learners to their programs may be harmed and, consequently, our business may suffer.
As new mobile devices and features are released, we may encounter problems in developing or supporting apps for them. In addition, supporting new devices and mobile device operating systems may require substantial time and resources.
The success of our mobile apps could also be harmed by factors outside our control, such as:
•actions taken by mobile app distributors;
•unfavorable treatment received by our mobile apps, especially as compared to competing apps, such as the placement of our mobile apps in a mobile app download store;
•increased costs in the distribution and use of our mobile app; or
•changes in mobile operating systems, such as iOS and Android, that degrade the functionality of our mobile website or mobile apps or that give preferential treatment to competitive offerings.
If our learners, customers, or educator partners encounter difficulty accessing or using, or if they choose not to use, our mobile solutions, our growth prospects and our business may be adversely affected.
Our use and processing of personal information and other data is subject to laws and obligations relating to privacy and data protection, and our failure to comply with such laws and obligations could harm our business.
In the ordinary course of our business, and in particular in connection with merchandising our services to our learners, we collect, process, store, and use personal information and data supplied by learners. Numerous federal, state, and foreign laws, rules, and regulations govern privacy, data protection, and the collection, use, and protection of personal information and other types of data we collect, use, disclose, and otherwise process. These laws, rules, and regulations are constantly evolving, and we expect that there will continue to be new proposed laws, regulations, and industry standards concerning privacy, data protection, and information security in the U.S., the EU, and globally.
In the U.S., the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) grants California consumers rights to access, delete, and opt out of the sale of their personal information, while imposing operational requirements on businesses. As amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”) in 2023, these laws expanded consumer rights to include sensitive data protections and behavioral advertising opt-outs, and established a dedicated state agency for enforcement, increasing compliance obligations and associated costs for businesses. Additionally, numerous other U.S. states, such as Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah, have passed privacy laws, and there are a number of additional proposals for U.S. federal and state privacy laws that could increase our potential liability, add layers of complexity to compliance in the U.S. market, increase our compliance costs, and adversely affect our business. In addition, all 50 states have laws, including obligations to provide security breach notifications of computer databases that contain personal information to affected individuals, state officers, and others. Aspects of these U.S. state privacy laws and other laws and regulations relating to data protection, privacy, and information security, as well as their enforcement, remain unclear, and we may be required to modify our practices in an effort to comply with them.
The EU General Data Protection Regulation and UK General Data Protection Regulation (together, “GDPR”) impose stringent data protection requirements on businesses processing personal data of EU and UK data subjects, respectively. The GDPR is wide-ranging in scope and imposes numerous additional requirements on companies that process personal data, including requiring that lawful bases exist for all processing of personal data, requiring disclosures to individuals regarding data processing activities, requiring that safeguards are implemented to protect the security of personal data, creating mandatory data breach notification requirements in certain circumstances, and requiring that certain measures (including contractual obligations) are taken when engaging third-party processors or transferring data overseas. The GDPR also provides individuals with various rights in respect of their personal data, including rights of access, erasure, portability, rectification, restriction, and objection. Complying with the GDPR remains an onerous and potentially costly obligation as interpretations of the specific requirements emerge through the courts, enforcement decisions, and regulatory guidance. The European Commission issued an adequacy decision in respect of the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (the “Framework”) on July 10, 2023, permitting transfers of personal data from the EU to U.S. organizations certified under the Framework, without additional transfer mechanisms. The Framework also applies to transfers from the UK to the U.S. as of October 12, 2023. However, legal challenges to the validity of this adequacy decision have been lodged in the EU, with further challenges expected.
Similar data privacy laws, rules, and regulations in other countries may also impact our business, such as laws in the People’s Republic of China, Singapore, Brazil, and India.
Furthermore, future laws, rules, and regulations with respect to AI in the U.S. or internationally may significantly impact our business. In March 2024, the European Commission adopted the Artificial Intelligence Act (“AI Act”), which is expected to take full effect in 2026. The AI Act will introduce significant compliance obligations and regulatory fines for breaches on all operators of AI systems. A particular risk of the AI Act is the potential classification of certain uses of AI systems in an educational context as high risk, significantly increasing the compliance burden associated with running such AI systems and which may bring into question the feasibility of operating AI systems for certain use cases.
We cannot yet fully determine the impact that these or future laws, rules, and regulations may have on our business or operations. These laws, rules, and regulations may be inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another, subject to differing interpretations, and may be interpreted to conflict with our practices.
Additionally, we may be bound by contractual requirements applicable to our collection, use, processing, and disclosure of various types of data, including personal information, and may be bound by, or voluntarily comply with, self-regulatory or other industry standards relating to these matters. Any failure or perceived failure by us or any third parties with which we do business to comply with these laws, rules, and regulations, or with other obligations to which we or such third parties are or may become subject, may result in actions against us by government entities or private claims and litigation. For example, in 2023 a class action lawsuit alleging certain violations of the VPPA was filed against us, which was dismissed with prejudice after the parties agreed to a mutual release of claims without monetary settlement in January 2025. Any such action may subject us to substantial legal and other costs, may require substantial time and resources to defend, may result in fines, penalties, or other liabilities, and likely would damage our reputation and adversely affect our business and operating results. In many jurisdictions, enforcement actions and consequences for non-compliance with protection, privacy, and information security laws and regulations are rising. In the U.S., possible consequences for non-compliance include enforcement actions in response to rules and regulations promulgated under the authority of federal agencies, state attorneys general, legislatures, and consumer protection agencies. In the EU, data protection authorities may impose large penalties for violations of the data protection laws, including potential fines of up to €20 million or 4% of annual global revenue, whichever is greater. The authorities have shown a willingness to impose significant fines on businesses and issue orders preventing them from processing personal data. Data subjects and consumer associations also have a right of action to lodge complaints with supervisory authorities, seek judicial remedies, and obtain compensation for damages resulting from violations of applicable data protection laws. In addition, privacy advocates and industry groups have regularly proposed, and may propose in the future, self-regulatory standards that may legally or contractually apply to us. If we fail to follow these standards, even if no learner information is compromised, we may incur significant fines or other costs.
Further, in view of new or modified federal, state, or foreign laws and regulations, industry standards, contractual obligations, and other legal obligations, or any changes in their interpretation, we may find it necessary or desirable to fundamentally change our business activities and practices or to expend significant resources to modify our services, and otherwise adapt to these changes. We may be unable to make such changes and modifications in a commercially reasonable manner or at all, and our ability to develop new features could be limited. Privacy, data protection, and information security concerns, whether valid or invalid, may inhibit the use and growth of our platform, particularly in certain foreign countries.
Our use of social media, emails, push notifications, and text messages in ways that do not comply with applicable laws and regulations, may lead to the loss or infringement of IP, result in unintended disclosure, harm our reputation, or subject us to fines or other penalties.
We use social media, emails, push notifications, and text messages as part of our omnichannel marketing approach. As laws and regulations evolve to govern the use of these channels, the failure by us, our employees, our educator partners, or third parties acting at our direction to comply with applicable laws and regulations in the use of these channels could adversely affect our reputation or subject us to fines or other penalties. In addition, our employees, our educator partners, or third parties acting at our direction may knowingly or inadvertently make use of social media in ways that could lead to the loss or infringement of IP, as well as the public disclosure of proprietary, confidential, or sensitive personal information of our business, employees, learners, customers, educator partners, or others. Information concerning us, our learners, customers. or educator partners, whether accurate or not, may be posted on social media platforms at any time and may have an adverse impact on our brand, reputation, or business. The harm may be immediate without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction and could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, operating results, financial condition, and prospects.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
Any failure to obtain, maintain, protect, or enforce our IP and proprietary rights could impair our ability to protect our proprietary technology and our brand and could materially harm our business.
We rely on a combination of IP rights, contractual protections, and other practices to protect our brand, proprietary information, technologies, and processes. We primarily rely on copyright, trade secret, and patent laws to protect our proprietary technologies and processes, including key algorithms. Others may independently develop or improperly acquire similar technologies or processes, which may allow them to provide a service similar to ours, which could harm our competitive position. Our principal trademark assets include the registered trademark “Coursera” and our logos and taglines. We also hold the rights to the “Coursera.org” internet domain name and various related domain names, which are subject to global internet regulatory bodies and laws. If we are unable to protect our trademarks or domain names, our brand recognition and reputation would suffer, we would incur significant expense establishing new brands, and our operating results would be adversely impacted. We cannot guarantee that pending patent applications will result in patents that provide effective protection. Even issued patents may be circumvented or challenged before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. In addition, we cannot assure you that every significant feature of our technology and services will be protected by any patent or patent application. Further, to the extent we pursue patent protection for our innovations, patents we may apply for may not be issued, and issued patents may not provide us with any competitive advantages. There can be no assurance that any patents we obtain will adequately protect our inventions or survive a legal challenge, as the legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability, and scope of protection of patent and other IP rights are uncertain.
Third parties may challenge or infringe on our patents, copyrights, trademarks, and other IP and proprietary rights owned or held by us. We may be required to spend significant resources to monitor and protect our IP rights, and our efforts may not be sufficient. Even if we do detect violations, enforcement, including litigation, could be time-consuming and expensive, diverting management’s attention and potentially leading to defenses and counterclaims. If we are unable to cost-effectively protect or enforce our IP rights, then our business could be harmed. An adverse decision in any of these legal actions could limit our ability to assert our IP or proprietary rights, limit the value of our IP or proprietary rights, or otherwise negatively impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations. If the protection of our IP and proprietary rights is inadequate to enforce and prevent use or misappropriation by third parties, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be diminished, competitors may be able to more effectively mimic our service and methods of operations, the perception of our business and service to customers and potential customers may become confused in the marketplace, and our ability to attract customers may be adversely affected.
We may be subject to IP claims, which are extremely costly to defend, could require us to pay significant damages, and could limit our ability to use certain technologies in the future.
Companies in the technology industry frequently face litigation for alleged infringement or other violations of IP rights. We periodically receive notices claiming we have infringed, misappropriated, or misused other parties’ IP rights. As our public recognition grows, the risk of facing IP claims increases. Any IP claims against us, with or without merit, could be time consuming and expensive to settle or litigate and could divert the attention of our management. Litigation regarding IP rights is inherently uncertain due to the complex issues involved, and we may not be successful in defending ourselves in such matters.
In addition, some of our competitors have extensive portfolios of issued patents and significant resources to enforce their IP rights. Any claims successfully brought against us could subject us to significant liability for damages, and we may be required to stop using technology or other IP alleged to be in violation of a third party’s rights. We also might be required to seek a license for third-party IP. Even if a license is available, we could be required to pay significant royalties or submit to unreasonable terms, which would increase our operating expenses. We may also be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant time and expense. If we cannot license or develop technology for any allegedly infringing aspect of our business, we would be forced to limit our service and may be unable to compete effectively. Any of these results could harm our business.
Confidentiality agreements with employees and others may not adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and proprietary information.
We have devoted substantial resources to the development of our IP and proprietary rights. In order to protect our IP and proprietary rights, we rely in part on confidentiality agreements with our employees, licensees, independent contractors, and other advisors. These agreements may not effectively prevent disclosure of confidential information and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. In addition, others may independently discover trade secrets and proprietary information, and in such cases, we could not assert any trade secret rights against such parties. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive business position.
Our use of open source software (“OSS”) could negatively affect our ability to offer our solutions and subject us to possible litigation.
A substantial portion of our platform and our solutions incorporate OSS, and we may incorporate additional OSS in the future. OSS is generally freely accessible, usable, and modifiable. Certain OSS licenses may, in certain circumstances, require us (i) to offer our solutions that incorporate OSS for no cost, (ii) to make available source code for modifications or derivative works we create based upon incorporating or using OSS; and (iii) to license such modifications or derivative works under the terms of the particular OSS license. If an author or other third party that distributes OSS we use were to allege non-compliance with the license conditions, we may incur significant legal expenses defending against such allegations. We could also be required to disclose our proprietary code, and could be subject to significant damages. This could include injunctions preventing us from offering our solutions that contain the OSS, or being required to comply with one or more license conditions. Any of these outcomes could disrupt our ability to offer the affected solutions. We could also be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be OSS. Litigation could consume management’s time and attention, be costly for us to defend, and have a negative effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Individuals that appear in content hosted on our platform may claim violation of their rights.
Instructors and learners featured in video segments hosted on our platform may claim that we did not obtain proper assignments, licenses, consents, and releases for using their likenesses, images, or other contributed content. Although our educator partners are contractually required to secure these rights for their course material, we cannot be certain that they have done so. Moreover, the laws governing rights of publicity and privacy, and the laws governing instructor ownership of educational content, are imprecise and adjudicated on a case-by-case basis, such that the enforcement of agreements to transfer the necessary rights is unclear. As a result, we could incur liability to third parties for the unauthorized duplication, display, distribution, or other use of this material. Any such claims could subject us to costly litigation and impose a significant strain on our financial resources and management personnel, regardless of whether the claims have merit. Our various liability insurance coverages may not cover potential claims of this type adequately or at all, and we may be required to alter or cease our use of such material, which may include changing or removing content from courses, or to pay monetary damages. Moreover, claims by instructors and learners could damage our reputation, regardless of whether such claims have merit.
Risks Related to Tax, Accounting, and Operations
Our business is subject to indirect taxes.
The application of indirect taxes, such as sales and use taxes, value-added taxes, provincial taxes, goods and services taxes, business taxes, digital service taxes, and gross receipt taxes to businesses like ours is complex and constantly evolving. Significant judgment is required to evaluate applicable tax obligations, and we record estimates that could change. In many cases, the ultimate tax determination is uncertain because it is not clear how existing statutes may apply to our business. Federal, state, local, or foreign jurisdictions may seek to impose additional reporting, recordkeeping, or indirect tax collection obligations on businesses like ours that facilitate e-commerce. For example, in 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that, in certain situations, states can require online merchants to collect and remit sales taxes on transactions in the state despite not having a physical presence in the state. Changes to indirect tax law could lead to substantial costs for tax collection, remittance, and audit responses, which could affect our operating results or harm our business in the event that we change our pricing to account for the increased obligations.
Amendments to existing tax laws, rules, or regulations or enactment of new unfavorable tax laws, rules, or regulations could have an adverse effect on our business and operating results.
Many of the underlying laws, rules, and regulations imposing taxes and other obligations were established before the growth of the internet and e-commerce. U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign taxing authorities are currently reviewing the appropriate treatment of companies engaged in e-commerce and considering changes to existing tax or other laws that could levy sales, income, consumption, use, or other taxes relating to our activities, and/or impose obligations on us to collect such taxes. If such tax or other laws, rules, or regulations are amended, or if new laws, rules, or regulations are enacted, the results could increase our tax payments or other obligations, prospectively or retrospectively, subject us to interest and penalties, decrease the demand for our services if we pass on such costs to our learners, customers, or educator partners, result in increased costs to update or expand our technological or administrative infrastructure, or effectively limit the scope of our business activities if we decided not to conduct business in particular jurisdictions. As a result, these changes may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.
Our ability to use our net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.
We have incurred substantial federal NOLs during prior periods. NOLs may carry forward to offset future taxable income; however, they could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities. Specifically, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act imposes certain limitations on the deduction of NOLs generated in tax years that began on or after January 1, 2018, including a limitation on use of NOLs to offset only 80% of taxable income and the disallowance of NOL carrybacks. Although NOLs generated in tax years before 2018 may still be used to offset future income without limitation, the recent legislation, among other regulatory and economic changes, may limit our ability to use our NOLs to offset any future taxable income. Our NOLs may similarly expire under state laws. In addition, under the rules of Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change”, generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its NOLs and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change taxable income or taxes may be limited. The applicable rules generally operate by focusing on changes in ownership among stockholders considered by the rules as owning, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of the stock, as well as changes in ownership arising from new issuances of stock by the company. As a result of these rules, in the event that we experience one or more ownership changes as a result of future transactions in our stock, we may be limited in our ability to use our NOL carryforwards to offset our future taxable income, if any.
Our reported results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in generally accepted accounting principles.
Generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported results of operations and could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the effective date of the change. It is difficult to predict the impact of future changes to accounting principles or our accounting policies, any of which could negatively affect our reported financial position or results of operations.
If our internal control over financial reporting (“ICOFR”) or our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, prevent fraud, or file our periodic reports in a timely manner, which may cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and may lead to a decline in our stock price.
We are required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”). In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm is required to annually attest to the effectiveness of our ICOFR. SOX requires that we maintain effective ICOFR and disclosure controls and procedures. In particular, on an ongoing basis, we must perform system and process evaluations, document our controls, and perform testing of our key controls over financial reporting to allow management and our independent public accounting firm to report on the effectiveness of our ICOFR. If we are not able to comply with SOX requirements, or if we, or our independent public accounting firm, identify deficiencies in our ICOFR that are deemed to be material weaknesses, our stock price would likely decline, and we could be subject to lawsuits, sanctions, or investigations by regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources.
We may encounter difficulties in the timely and accurate reporting of our financial results, which would impact our ability to provide our investors with information in a timely manner. As a result, our investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and our stock price could decline.
Our operations as a public company require substantial costs and substantial management attention, and we may not be able to manage our operations as a public company effectively or efficiently.
As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting, and other expenses. Our management team and other personnel devote a substantial amount of time to, and we may not effectively, or efficiently manage our operations as a public company. For example, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the applicable requirements of SOX and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and the rules and regulations of the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. If, notwithstanding our efforts to comply with these laws, regulations, and standards, we fail to comply, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us, and our business may be harmed. Further, failure to comply with these rules might make it more difficult for us to obtain some types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we might be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of these events could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board, on committees of our Board, or as members of senior management. As such, we invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations, and standards. This investment results in increased general and administrative expenses.
If we are unable to recruit and retain skilled accounting and finance personnel, the quality and timeliness of our financial reporting may suffer, which could result in the identification of material weaknesses in our internal controls. Any consequences resulting from inaccuracies or delays in our financial reports filed with the SEC could cause our stock price to decline and could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our stock price has been volatile in the past and may be volatile in the future, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Our stock price has been volatile in the past and may be volatile in the future, and it has experienced declines in the past and may experience future declines. As a result, you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price at which your shares were acquired. Our stock price and its trading volume could fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:
•variations in our operating results and other financial and operational metrics, including the key financial and operating metrics disclosed in this Form 10-K, as well as how those results and metrics compare to analyst and investor expectations;
•speculation in the market about our operating results;
•the financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in these projections, or our failure to meet these projections;
•failure of securities analysts to initiate or maintain coverage of us, changes in financial estimates or ratings by any securities analysts who follow us, or our failure to meet these estimates or investor expectations;
•events or factors resulting from global health crises, war or other outbreak of hostilities, geopolitical tensions, acts of terrorism, responses to these events, or the perception that any such factors or events may occur;
•announcements of new services or enhancements, strategic alliances or significant agreements, or other developments by us or our competitors;
•announcements by us or our competitors of mergers or acquisitions or rumors of such transactions involving us or our competitors;
•changes in management, other key personnel, or our Board;
•disruptions in our platform due to hardware, software, network problems, security breaches, or other issues;
•the strength of the global economy or the economy in the jurisdictions in which we operate, and market conditions in our industry and those affecting our educator partners and learners;
•trading activity by our principal stockholders, and other market participants, in whom ownership of our common stock may be concentrated;
•market perception of, or reaction to, our restructuring and expense reduction initiatives, including the initiative announced in October 2024 (refer to Note 14, “Restructuring Related Charges”, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K);
•price and volume fluctuations, and general volatility, in the overall stock market;
•the performance of the equity markets in general and in our industry;
•the operating performance of other similar companies;
•actual or anticipated developments in our business, our competitors’ businesses, or the competitive landscape generally;
•new laws or regulations, new interpretations of existing laws, or regulations applicable to our business;
•litigation or other claims against us;
•the number of shares of our common stock that are available for public trading; and
•any other factors discussed in this Form 10-K.
In addition, if the market for technology stocks, education stocks, or the stock market in general experiences a loss of investor confidence, whether due to any of the foregoing factors or otherwise, our stock price could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, results of operations, or financial condition. Our stock price might also decline in reaction to events that affect other companies, even if those events do not directly affect us. These broad market fluctuations, as well as general economic, political, and market conditions, such as recessions or inflation, may cause declines in our stock price, and you may not realize any return on your investment in us and may lose some or all of your investment.
Some companies that have experienced volatility in their stock price have been the subject of securities class action litigation. If we are the subject of such litigation, it could result in substantial costs and could divert our management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect our business.
In addition, as of December 31, 2024, we had 25,438,046 shares that were issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options or the vesting of outstanding restricted and performance stock units. Sales of stock by these equity holders or the perception that such sales could occur could adversely affect our stock price.
We may issue additional common stock, convertible securities, or other equity in the future. We also expect to issue common stock to our employees, directors, and other service providers pursuant to our equity incentive plans. Such issuances will be dilutive to investors and could cause our stock price to decline. New investors in such issuances could also receive rights senior to those of holders of our common stock.
Our actual operating results may not meet our guidance or analyst or investor expectations, which would likely cause our stock price to decline.
From time to time, we have released and may continue to release guidance in our earnings releases, earnings conference calls, or otherwise, regarding our expectations for future performance as of the date of release. If given, this guidance, which will include forward-looking statements, will be based on management’s projections. Projections are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that, while presented with numerical specificity, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. The principal reason that we expect to continue to release guidance is to provide a basis for our management to discuss our business outlook with analysts and investors. With or without our guidance, analysts and investors may publish or otherwise have expectations regarding our business, financial condition, and results of operations, for which we do not accept any responsibility. Guidance is necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions of the guidance furnished by us or analysts will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. If our actual performance does not meet or exceed our guidance or analyst or investor expectations, our stock price is likely to decline.
We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future, so any returns on your investment will be limited to changes in the value of our common stock.
We have never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently anticipate that we will retain future earnings for the development, operation, and expansion of our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any dividends for the foreseeable future. In addition, if we were to enter into loan or similar agreements in the future, these agreements may contain restrictions on our ability to pay dividends or make distributions. Any return to stockholders will therefore be limited to the increase, if any, in our stock price, which may never occur.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of our Company more difficult, limit attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management, and reduce our stock price.
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws include provisions that:
•authorize our Board to issue, without further action by the stockholders, shares of undesignated preferred stock with terms, rights, and preferences determined by our Board that may be senior to our common stock;
•require that any action to be taken by our stockholders be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting and not by written consent;
•specify that special meetings of our stockholders can be called only by our Board, the Chairman of our Board, our President, or our Chief Executive Officer;
•establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought before an annual meeting, including proposed nominations of persons for election to our Board;
•establish that our Board is divided into three classes, with each class serving three-year staggered terms;
•prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors;
•provide that our directors may be removed only for cause;
•provide that vacancies on our Board may be filled by a majority of directors then in office, even if less than a quorum; and
•require the approval of our Board or the holders of at least 66 2/3% of our outstanding shares of capital stock to amend our bylaws and certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation.
These provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our Board, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management. In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in a broad range of business combinations with any interested stockholder for a period of three years following the date on which such stockholder became an interested stockholder. Further, as a PBC, we may be less attractive as a takeover target than a traditional company and, therefore, your ability to realize your investment through an acquisition may be limited. Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction or changes in our management could cause our stock price to decline or could prevent or deter a transaction that you might support.
The exclusive forum provision in our organizational documents may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if that court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, another federal or state court situated in the State of Delaware) shall be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers, or other employees to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws, or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Our amended and restated charter and bylaws further provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts are the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.
Our amended and restated bylaws also provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law and unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the U.S. will be the sole and exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. The enforceability of similar exclusive federal forum provisions in other companies’ organizational documents has been challenged in legal proceedings, and while the Delaware Supreme Court and certain other state courts have ruled that this type of exclusive federal forum provision is facially valid under Delaware law, there is uncertainty as to whether other courts would enforce such provisions and that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. This exclusive federal forum provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts of the U.S. have exclusive jurisdiction.
Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws described above. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers, or other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find these provisions of our bylaws inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of our management and Board.
Risks Relating to Our Existence as a Public Benefit Corporation
Although we operate as a Delaware PBC, we cannot assure that we will achieve our public benefit purpose.
As a Delaware PBC, we must operate in a responsible and sustainable manner, balancing our stockholders’ pecuniary interests, the best interests of those materially affected by our conduct, and the public benefit identified in our certificate of incorporation. However, there is no assurance that we will achieve our public benefit purpose or realize the expected positive impact. Failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, which in turn, may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
As a PBC, we are required to publicly report at least biennially on our overall public benefit performance and on our assessment of our success in achieving our specific public benefit purpose. If we are not timely, are unable to provide this report, or if the report is not viewed favorably by parties doing business with us or by regulators or others reviewing our credentials, our reputation and status as a PBC may be harmed.
If our publicly reported Certified B CorporationTM (“B Corp”) score declines, if we lose our certified B Corp status, or if we choose not to renew our B Corp certification, our reputation could be harmed and our business could suffer.
We are certified as a B Corp through B Lab, which requires us to meet rigorous standards of social and environmental performance, accountability, and transparency. Our business model and brand could be harmed if we were to lose or if we were to choose not to renew our certification as a B Corp. We must undergo a reassessment every three years to maintain our B Corp certification, and we last completed such assessment in 2022. B Lab’s certification requirements are subject to periodic changes and updates, including a recently-released proposed new framework, which if adopted in its present form, could make it more difficult to achieve certification. Whether due to our choice or our failure to meet B Lab’s certification requirements, a loss of our certification could create a perception that we are more focused on financial performance and no longer as committed to the values expected of a B Corp. Likewise, our reputation could be harmed if our publicly reported B Corp score declines or if we take actions that are perceived to be misaligned with B Corp values.
As a PBC, our focus on a specific public benefit purpose and producing a positive effect for society may negatively impact our financial performance.
Unlike traditional Delaware corporations, whose directors have a fiduciary duty to focus exclusively on maximizing stockholder value, our directors have a fiduciary duty to consider not only stockholders’ interests, but also the Company’s specific public benefit and the interests of other stakeholders affected by our actions. Therefore, we may take actions that we believe will be in the best interests of those stakeholders materially affected by our specific benefit purpose, even if those actions do not maximize our financial results. While our public benefit designation aims to provide an overall net benefit to us, our learners, customers, and educator partners, it may lead to decisions and actions that do not prioritize income generation, and hence may affect distribution to our stockholders. Our pursuit of longer-term or non-pecuniary benefits may not materialize within the timeframe we expect or at all and may have a negative effect on any amounts available for distribution to our stockholders. Accordingly, being a PBC and complying with our related obligations could harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.
Additionally, as a PBC, we may be less attractive as a takeover target than traditional companies and, therefore, your ability to realize your investment through an acquisition may be limited. PBCs may also not be attractive targets for activists or hedge fund investors because new directors would still have to consider and give appropriate weight to the public benefit along with stockholder value, and stockholders can enforce this through derivative suits. Further, by requiring the boards of directors of PBCs to consider additional constituencies other than maximizing stockholder value, Delaware PBC law could potentially make it easier for a board to reject a hostile bid, even where the takeover would provide the greatest short-term financial yield to investors.
Our directors have a fiduciary duty to consider not only our stockholders’ interests, but also our specific public benefit and the interests of other stakeholders affected by our actions. If a conflict between such interests arises, there is no guarantee such a conflict would be resolved in favor of our stockholders.
As a PBC, our directors have a fiduciary duty to consider not only the stockholders’ interests, but also the company’s specific public benefit and the interests of other stakeholders affected by the company’s actions. Under Delaware law, directors are shielded from liability for breach of these obligations if they make informed and disinterested decisions that serve a rational purpose. Thus, unlike traditional Delaware corporations that must focus exclusively on stockholder value, our directors are not merely permitted, but obligated, to consider our specific public benefit and the interests of other stakeholders. In the event of a conflict between the interests of our stockholders and the interests of our specific public benefit or our other stakeholders, our directors must only make informed and disinterested decisions that serve a rational purpose; thus, there is no guarantee such a conflict would be resolved in favor of our stockholders, which could harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.
Our focus on the long-term best interests of our Company as a PBC and our consideration of all of our stakeholders, including our stockholders, learners, customers, educator partners, employees, the communities in which we operate, and other stakeholders that we may identify from time to time, may conflict with short- or medium-term financial interests and business performance, which may negatively impact our stock price.
We believe that focusing on the long-term best interests of our Company as a PBC and our consideration of all of our stakeholders, including our stockholders, learners, customers, educator partners, employees, the communities in which we operate, and other stakeholders we may identify from time to time, is essential to the long-term success of our Company and to long-term stockholder value. Therefore, we have made, and may in the future, make decisions that we believe are in the long-term best interests of our Company and our stockholders, even if such decisions may negatively impact the short- or medium-term performance of our business, results of operations, and financial condition or the short- or medium-term performance of our common stock. Our commitment to pursuing long-term value for the Company and its stockholders, potentially at the expense of short- or medium-term performance, may have a material adverse effect on our stock price, including making ownership of our common stock less appealing to investors who are focused on returns over a shorter time horizon. Our decisions and actions aimed at achieving long-term success and enhancing long-term stockholder value—such as improving platform trust and safety, altering community support delivery, strengthening relationships with learners, customers, educator partners, and employees, introducing new offerings and services, investing in social impact initiatives, and adapting to regulatory changes—may not yield the anticipated long-term benefits. If these initiatives do not deliver the expected outcomes, our business, results of operations, financial condition, and our stock price could be materially adversely affected.
As a PBC, we may be subject to increased derivative litigation concerning our duty to balance stockholder and public benefit interests, the occurrence of which may have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Stockholders of a PBC (if they, individually or collectively, own the lesser of (i) two percent of the company’s outstanding shares, or (ii) shares with a market value of $2 million or more on the date the lawsuit is instituted) are entitled to file a derivative lawsuit claiming the directors failed to balance stockholder and public benefit interests. Such derivative suits would be subject to the exclusive forum provision in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, requiring them to be heard in the Delaware Chancery Court (or, if that court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, another federal or state court situated in the State of Delaware). This potential liability does not exist for traditional corporations. Therefore, we may be subject to the possibility of increased derivative litigation, which would require management’s attention, and, as a result, may adversely impact our management’s ability to effectively execute our strategy. Additionally, any such derivative litigation may be costly, which may harm our financial condition and results of operations.
If we cannot maintain our company culture and public benefit commitment, our business could be harmed.
We believe that our company culture has been critical to our success. In addition, we believe that our status as a PBC and our commitment to providing global access to flexible and affordable world-class learning that supports personal development, career advancement, and economic opportunity distinguish us from our competitors and promote a relationship founded on trust among our learners, customers, educator partners, and employees. However, we face a number of challenges that may affect our ability to sustain our company culture, including:
•a need to identify, attract, reward, and retain people in leadership positions in our organization who share and further our culture, values, mission, and public benefit objectives;
•the increasing size and geographic diversity of our workforce, and our ability to promote an inclusive and consistent culture for all of our employees;
•the market perception about our public benefit objectives;
•competitive pressures that may divert us from our mission, vision, and values;
•the continued challenges of a rapidly evolving industry; and
•the increasing need to develop expertise in new areas of business that affect us.
If we are unable to maintain our company culture and demonstrate our commitment to our mission as a PBC, it could harm our business and reputation.