PART I
ITEM 1.
IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not
required.
ITEM 2.
OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not
required.
ITEM 3.
KEY INFORMATION
A.
Selected financial data
The
following selected consolidated financial data as of December 31,
2016 and 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and
2014 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial
statements of Fincera included in this Annual Report beginning on
page F-1. The following summary consolidated financial data as
of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the years ended December 31,
2013 and 2012, have been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements of Fincera. Such financial data is not
included in this Annual Report. The consolidated financial
data for all periods presented is retrospectively adjusted to
reflect the acquisition of Eastern Eagle International Ltd.
(“Eastern Eagle”) and its subsidiaries, which were
under common control with us both immediately before and after the
acquisition (refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements). Prior period amounts also have been adjusted to
exclude discontinued operations (refer to Note 4 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements). This information is only a
summary and should be read together with the consolidated financial
statements, the related notes, the section entitled
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of Fincera” and other
financial information included in this Annual Report.
The
consolidated financial statements are prepared and presented in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States, or “U.S. GAAP.” The results of
operations of Fincera in any period may not necessarily be
indicative of the results that may be expected for any future
period. See “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this
Annual Report.
FINCERA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except per share
amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Data –
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
$
104,123
|
$
72,262
|
$
28,112
|
$
45,577
|
$
75,929
|
Restricted
cash
|
$
6,129
|
$
157
|
$
988
|
$
1,244
|
$
160
|
Total current
assets
|
$
798,024
|
$
666,820
|
$
475,218
|
$
499,721
|
$
498,564
|
Total
assets
|
$
1,030,997
|
$
924,423
|
$
808,604
|
$
761,921
|
$
545,073
|
Total current
liabilities
|
$
879,610
|
$
550,039
|
$
382,216
|
$
441,036
|
$
363,418
|
Total
liabilities
|
$
1,008,357
|
$
671,050
|
$
538,668
|
$
489,093
|
$
363,418
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
$
22,640
|
$
253,373
|
$
269,936
|
$
272,828
|
$
181,655
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement
of Income Data –
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
$
132,028
|
$
72,773
|
$
20,023
|
$
5,301
|
$
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
3,290
|
(12,295
)
|
(36,649
)
|
(29,976
)
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
provision (benefit)
|
1,286
|
(2,863
)
|
(7,309
)
|
(3,674
)
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
2,004
|
(9,432
)
|
(29,340
)
|
(26,302
)
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
165
|
8,205
|
26,488
|
27,441
|
22,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) attributable to shareholders
|
$
2,169
|
$
(1,227
)
|
$
(2,852
)
|
$
1,139
|
$
22,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per share –
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
$
0.08
|
$
(0.40
)
|
$
(1.24
)
|
$
(1.12
)
|
$
—
|
Discontinued
operations
|
0.01
|
0.35
|
1.12
|
1.17
|
0.94
|
|
$
0.09
|
$
(0.05
)
|
$
(0.12
)
|
$
0.05
|
$
0.94
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
$
0.08
|
$
(0.40
)
|
$
(1.24
)
|
$
(1.12
)
|
$
—
|
Discontinued
operations
|
0.01
|
0.35
|
1.12
|
1.17
|
0.94
|
|
$
0.09
|
$
(0.05
)
|
$
(0.12
)
|
$
0.05
|
$
0.94
|
B.
Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not
required.
C.
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not
required.
D.
Risk Factors
An investment in our securities involves risk. The discussion of
risks related to our business contained in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F comprises material risks of which we are aware. If any of
the events or developments described actually occurs, our business,
financial condition or results of operations would likely
suffer. The discussion of risks related to our business
contained in this Annual Report on Form 20-F also includes
forward-looking statements, and our actual results may differ
substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking
statements. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements.”
You should carefully consider the following risk factors, together
with all of the other information included in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
Risks Relating to our Business
We have recently made significant changes to our business model,
and our new model may not be successful.
We have
undergone a strategic shift which involves growing our new
internet-based businesses (launched in 2014 and 2015) and ceasing
our legacy commercial vehicle sales, leasing and support business.
There is no guarantee that our new businesses will be successful,
profitable or provide an equal or greater return on investment as
compared to the businesses we are winding down.
Our changing business model, limited operating history and the new
and evolving nature of our industry makes evaluating our future
prospects difficult.
China’s
internet-based financial services industry is relatively new and
may not develop as expected. Its regulatory framework is also
evolving and may remain uncertain for the foreseeable
future.
Our
first two internet-based businesses, the CeraVest lending platform
and the CeraPay payments platform, were launched at the end of
2014. Since then we have launched three ecommerce platforms: in
October 2015 we launched TruShip, in March 2016 we launched
AutoChekk and in July 2016 we launched PingPing (for a description
of these platforms please see “Item 4. Information on our
Company – B. Business Overview – Internet-based
Businesses – Ecommerce). We are also in the process of
developing and launching additional internet-based businesses. Our
new businesses have a limited operating history. Therefore, it is
difficult to effectively assess our future prospects. There are
many risks and challenges we are subject to including, but not
limited to:
●
Transitioning to
new business models;
●
Navigating an
evolving regulatory environment;
●
achieving and
maintaining our profitability and margins;
●
acquiring and
retaining customers;
●
attracting,
training and retaining qualified personnel;
●
broadening our
product offering;
●
maintaining
adequate control over our costs and expenses;
●
maintaining the
security of our platforms and the confidentiality of the
information provided and utilized across our
platforms;
●
managing credit
risk in our portfolio of loans;
●
responding to
competitive and changing market conditions.
If we
are unsuccessful in addressing any of the above risks, our business
may be materially and adversely affected.
If we fail to adequately assess, monitor and control the credit
risks of our customers, we could experience an increase in credit
loss.
We are
subject to the credit risk of our customers. We use various methods
to screen potential customers and establish appropriate credit
limits, but these methods cannot eliminate all potential credit
risks and may not always prevent us from approving customer
applications that are not credit worthy or are fraudulently
completed. Changes in our industry and customer demand may result
in periodic increases to customer credit limits and spending and,
as a result, could lead to increased credit losses. We may also
fail to detect changes to the credit risk of customers over time.
Further, during a declining economic environment, we experience
increased customer defaults and preference claims by bankrupt
customers. If we fail to adequately manage our credit risks, our
bad debt expense could be significantly higher than historic levels
and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial
condition.
Significant defaults by financing customers could materially and
adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
We are
subject to credit risk associated with potential loan defaults. If
a significant number of customers fail to make payments when due,
we may not be able to fully recover the outstanding principal of
loans we make, which could significantly affect our
profitability.
A security breach or malicious attack could damage our reputation,
expose us to the risks of litigation and liability, disrupt our
business or otherwise harm our results of operations.
In the
normal course of business, we collect, process and retain sensitive
and confidential customer information. Despite the security
measures we have in place, which includes performing security
scans, penetration testing and server activity monitoring, our
facilities and systems, and those of third-party service providers,
could be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism,
computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming or human
errors or other similar events. Any security breach or malicious
attack involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized
disclosure of confidential information, whether by us or by
third-party service providers, could damage our reputation, expose
us to the risks of litigation and liability, disrupt our business
or otherwise harm our results of operations.
The laws and regulations governing the internet-based finance
industry in China are developing and evolving and subject to
changes. If our practice is deemed to violate any PRC laws or
regulations, we could be forced to change our business practices or
be subject to penalties.
Due to
the relatively short history of the internet finance industry in
China, the regulatory framework governing our industry is still
developing. On July 18, 2015 the People’s Bank of China,
together with nine other PRC regulatory agencies, jointly issued a
series of policy measures applicable to the industry titled the
Guidelines on Promoting the Healthy Development of Internet
Finance, or the Guidelines. The Guidelines introduced formally for
the first time the regulatory framework and some basic principles
for administering the industry in China. The Guidelines call for
active government support of China’s internet finance
industry and clarify the division of responsibility among
regulatory agencies. The Guidelines specify that the China Banking
Regulatory Commission, or the CBRC, will have primary regulatory
responsibility for the online peer-to-peer lending service industry
in China while the People’s Bank of China
(“PBOC”) will oversee the online payment businesses.
The Guidelines only set out the basic principles for promoting and
administering the internet-based finance industry, and were not
accompanied by any implementing rules. The Guidelines instead urge
the relevant regulatory agencies to adopt implementing rules at the
appropriate time.
On
December 28, 2015, the PBOC issued the final rules on online
payments for third party payment platforms. There are three main
areas covered by the rules: 1) strict know your customer
(“KYC”) checks to support anti-money laundering and
counter-terrorism efforts; 2) limits on daily transaction volume to
force payment platforms to focus on providing small e-commerce
transaction services; and 3) tiered regulation for platforms based
on a government rating system instead of a blanket approach. The
final online payment rules took effect on July 1, 2016. Although
our CeraPay product offers online payment processing services, we
are not a licensed third party payment service provider. Therefore,
it is unclear whether the PBOC rules on online payments apply to
us. We continue to evaluate the need to modify our business
practices to conform to the final regulations. Doing so may
adversely affect our ability to attract, retain or profitability
service customers and therefore have a material adverse effect on
our business.
On
August 24, 2016 the CBRC together with three other PRC regulatory
agencies jointly issued temporary rules for regulating the online
lending businesses in China (the “Temporary Rules”). As
previously communicated in the Guidelines, the rules state that
online lending platforms are designated as information
intermediaries for borrowers and lenders, and should not
participate in the transaction in any other way. The official
preface to the rules states that the main purpose of the
regulations is to promote risk management and establish ground
rules to limit the prevalence of unsound practices and illegal
activity in the industry. The draft rules ordered platforms to seek
bank custody services for customer funds and also set forth a list
of 13 prohibited activities:
●
Use the platform
for self-financing or financing of related parties
●
Directly or
indirectly accept and manage lender funds
●
Provide guarantees
to lenders or promise guaranteed returns on principal and
interest
●
Beyond the approved
internet, telecom, and other electronic channels, advertise or
recommend specific loan investments to lenders through physical
locations managed by the platform or third parties authorized by
the platform
●
Directly make loans
to borrowers, unless stated otherwise by applicable laws and
regulations
●
Structure loans
into investment products with liquidity timing that differs from
the original loan term
●
Sell self-managed
wealth management or other financial products to accumulate funds
or broker bank wealth management products, mutual funds, insurance
annuities, or trust products and other financial
products
●
Conduct
securitization like businesses or facilitate the secondary sale and
transfer of packaged assets, securitized assets, trust products, or
fund interests
●
Collaborate with
other investment or brokerage businesses to bundle, sell or broker
investment products, unless stated otherwise by applicable laws and
regulations
●
Provide false loan
information or exaggerate return expectations; conceal investment
risk; use biased language or other fraudulent methods to engage in
false advertising or marketing; fabricate and disseminate false or
incomplete information to damage the business reputation of another
or to mislead borrowers or lenders
●
Facilitate loans
for the purpose of making investments in the stock market, futures
contracts, structured products or other high-risk
investments
●
Provide equity
crowdfunding services
●
Other activities
forbidden by applicable laws and regulations
In
addition to the prohibited activities, borrowers are subject to
borrowing limits on a single platform as well as across multiple
platforms. Under the temporary rules,
natural persons may only carry a
loan balance of up to RMB 200,000 on a single platform and no more
than RMB 1 million across multiple platforms. While legal
representatives of organizations and other legal entities may only
borrow up to RMB 1 million on a single platform and no more than
RMB 5 million across multiple platforms.
The
Temporary Rules granted a 12-month transition period during which
platforms can work toward full compliance as more detailed measures
and guidelines are communicated by local financial bureaus tasked
with enforcement. Our online lending platform is registered as a
business in Shijiazhuang, Hebei; currently the province has not
issued its own guidelines for online lenders operating in the
region.
Following
the release of the regulations for online lending, on Feb 22, 2017,
the CBRC issued guidelines on fund custody services for online
lending businesses to offer further details on bank custody
requirement for lending platforms. These guidelines mandated that
lending platforms must employ third party fund custody services
from commercial banks in order to prevent unauthorized use of
customer funds by the platform. The regulations protected banks by
declaring that custodian banks are not liable for any fraudulent
activity or investment losses from defaults that occur on lending
platforms. Custodian banks are responsible for facilitating and
authenticating the custody account opening process and any
transactions that involve the customer funds in custody. Lending
platforms may only designate a single commercial bank to provide
the custody services. These guidelines granted a 6-month compliance
deadline which coincidently falls on about the same day as the
online lending regulations compliance deadline. We are currently in
preliminary discussions with several Chinese commercial banks
regarding custody services. If we are unable to secure a fund
custodian by the regulatory deadline we may be subject to
disciplinary action or fines from the local
regulators.
We have
determined that we will need to modify our business practices to
conform to the regulations issued by the CBRC and may be required
to make further modifications depending on guidance from local
regulators in Hebei. Doing so may adversely affect our ability to
attract, retain or profitability service customers and therefore
have a material adverse effect on our business.
As of
the date of this filing, we have not been subject to any material
fines or other penalties under any PRC laws or regulations
including those governing the peer-to-peer lending service industry
or online payments industry in China. Although regulations to date
do not set out the liabilities that will be imposed on the service
providers who fail to comply with the principles and requirements
contained thereunder, nor do other applicable rules, laws and
regulations contain specific liability provisions applicable to us.
However, if our practice is deemed to violate any rules, laws or
regulations, we may face injunctions, including orders to cease
illegal activities, and may be exposed to other penalties as
determined by the relevant government authorities as well. If such
situations occur, our business, financial condition and prospects
would be materially and adversely affected. In addition, given the
evolving regulatory environment in which we operate, we cannot rule
out the possibility that the PRC government will institute a
licensing regime covering our industry. If such a licensing regime
were introduced, we cannot assure you that we would be able to
obtain any newly required license in a timely manner, or at all,
which could materially and adversely affect our business and impede
our ability to continue our operations. We currently do not hold
any licenses or permits related to online payments or online
lending.
The internet-based finance industry in China is becoming
increasingly competitive and such increasing competition may limit
our growth.
The
internet-based finance industry in China is intensely competitive
and evolving rapidly. Although we primarily focus on the
transportation industry vertical, in which we have many years of
experience operating, there are a large number of broader
internet-based financial product offerings and e-commerce platforms
that may compete with our products and may be provided by
competitors that are larger and more established than us. With
respect to lending competition, we primarily compete with offline
boutique financing providers and in some cases internet-based
financing providers. With respect to investors, we primarily
compete with other investment products and asset classes, such as
equities, bonds, investment trust products, bank savings accounts,
real estate and alternative asset classes. If we are unable to
compete effectively, our business and results of operations could
be harmed. In addition, if we begin lending to other industries, we
will face more competition in those markets from more established
lenders.
New
competition may also reduce our growth prospects or level of
profitability. Competitors may also attempt to copy or replicate
our business model. This could have an adverse effect on our
business.
We have incurred net losses in the past and the new internet-based
business may incur net losses in the future.
Our
revenues of legacy commercial vehicle sales, leasing and support
business have declined as a result of our strategic shift towards
internet-based businesses. We cannot assure you that our new
internet-based businesses will be able to generate sufficient
revenues to generate net income in the future.
Fraudulent activity on our internet-based financial product
platforms could negatively impact our operating results, brand and
reputation and cause the use of our products to
decrease.
We are
subject to the risk of fraudulent activity on our internet-based
platforms, primarily from prospective borrowers. Borrowers could
use fraudulent means to procure credit that they would otherwise
not be extended. Our resources, technologies and fraud detection
tools may be insufficient to accurately detect and prevent such
fraud from occurring. Significant increases in fraudulent activity
could negatively impact our brand and reputation, reduce the volume
of transactions facilitated through our platform and lead us to
take additional steps to reduce fraud risk, which could increase
our costs. High profile fraudulent activity could even lead to
regulatory intervention, and may divert our management’s
attention and cause us to incur additional expenses and costs.
Although we have not experienced any material business or
reputational harm as a result of fraudulent activities in the past,
we cannot rule out the possibility that any of the foregoing may
occur causing harm to our business or reputation in the future. If
any of the foregoing were to occur, our results of operations and
financial conditions could be materially and adversely
affected.
Content displayed on our ecommerce websites by merchants may be
found objectionable by PRC regulatory authorities and may subject
us to penalties and other administrative actions.
The PRC government has adopted regulations governing internet
access and the distribution of information over the internet. Under
these regulations, Internet content providers and Internet
publishers are prohibited from posting or displaying over the
Internet any content that, among other things, violates PRC laws
and regulations, impairs the national dignity of China or the
public interest, or is obscene, superstitious, fraudulent or
defamatory. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in
the revocation of licenses to provide internet content or other
licenses, the closure of the concerned websites and reputational
harm. The website operator may also be held liable for the content
displayed on or linked to its website that is subject to
censorship.
If we are unable to control and screen out
inappropriate content posted by merchants on our ecommerce sites,
then our ecommerce sites may be subject to penalties and other
administrative actions.
We could be subject to allegations and lawsuits claiming that items
listed on our ecommerce websites by merchants are pirated,
counterfeit or illegal.
Goods
and services made available for sale by merchants on our ecommerce
platforms could be subject to allegations that they infringe
third-party copyrights, trademarks, patents or other intellectual
property rights. If we are unable to prevent counterfeiting and
infringement of intellectual property, we could be subject to
penalties, administrative actions and suffer damage to our
reputation and brand.
Misconduct, errors and failure to function by our employees and
third-party service providers could harm our business and
reputation.
We are
exposed to many types of operational risks, including the risk of
misconduct and errors by our employees and third-party service
providers. Our business depends on our employees and third-party
service providers to interact with potential borrowers and
investors, process large numbers of transactions and support the
loan collection process, all of which involve the use and
disclosure of personal information. We could be materially
adversely affected if transactions were redirected, misappropriated
or otherwise improperly executed, if personal information was
disclosed to unintended recipients or if an operational breakdown
or failure in the processing of transactions occurred, whether as a
result of human error, purposeful sabotage or fraudulent
manipulation of our operations or systems. In addition, the manner
in which we store and use certain personal information and interact
with borrowers and investors through our internet-based finance
platforms is governed by various PRC laws. It is not always
possible to identify and deter misconduct or errors by employees or
third-party service providers, and the precautions we take to
detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in
controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses. If any of our
employees or third-party service providers take, convert or misuse
funds, documents or data or fail to follow protocol when
interacting with borrowers and investors, we could be liable for
damages and subject to regulatory actions and penalties. We could
also be perceived to have facilitated or participated in the
illegal misappropriation of funds, documents or data, or the
failure to follow protocol, and therefore be subject to civil or
criminal liability.
Furthermore,
as we rely on certain third-party service providers, such as
third-party payment platforms and custodian banks, to conduct our
business, if these third-party service providers fail to function
properly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to find an
alternative in a timely and cost-efficient manner or at all. Any of
these occurrences could result in our diminished ability to operate
our business, potential liability to borrowers and investors,
inability to attract borrowers and investors, reputational damage,
regulatory intervention and financial harm, which could negatively
impact our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Increases in fees incurred by third-party service providers could
adversely affect our profitability.
We rely
on certain third-party service providers, such as third-party
payment platforms, custodian banks and cloud infrastructure
providers, to conduct our business. If these third-party service
providers were to increase the fees that they charge us, our
profitability could be adversely affected. Furthermore, we may not
be able offset any increase in expenses incurred. We could also
incur additional expenses to find other suitable third-party
service providers.
A severe or prolonged downturn in the Chinese or global economy
could materially reduce our revenues.
Any
prolonged slowdown in the Chinese or global economy may have a
negative impact on our business, results of operations and
financial condition. In particular, general economic factors and
conditions in China or worldwide, including the general interest
rate environment and unemployment rates, may affect borrower
willingness to seek loans and investor ability and desire to invest
in loans. Economic conditions in China are sensitive to global
economic conditions. The global financial markets have experienced
significant disruptions since 2008 and the United States, Europe
and other economies have experienced periods of recession. The
recovery from the lows of 2008 and 2009 has been uneven and there
are new challenges, including the escalation of the European
sovereign debt crisis from 2011 and the slowdown of China’s
economic growth since 2012, which may continue. There is
considerable uncertainty over the long-term effects of the
expansionary monetary and fiscal policies adopted by the central
banks and financial authorities of some of the world’s
leading economies, including the United States and China. There
have also been concerns over unrest in Ukraine, North Korea, the
Middle East and Africa, which have resulted in volatility in
financial and other markets, as well as concerns about the economic
effect of the tensions in the relationship between China and
surrounding Asian countries. If present Chinese and global economic
uncertainties persist, many of our investors may delay or reduce
their investment in the loans facilitated through our
platform.
Adverse
economic conditions could also reduce the number of qualified
borrowers seeking loans on our CeraVest platform, as well as their
ability to make payments. Should any of these situations occur, the
amount of loans facilitated through CeraVest and our net revenues
will decline, and our business and financial conditions will be
negatively impacted. Additionally, continued turbulence in the
international markets may adversely affect our ability to access
the capital markets to meet liquidity needs.
Our operations depend on the performance of the internet
infrastructure and fixed telecommunications networks in
China.
Almost
all access to the internet in China is maintained through
state-owned telecommunication operators under the administrative
control and regulatory supervision of the Ministry of Industry and
Information Technology, or the MIIT. We primarily rely on a limited
number of telecommunication service providers to provide us with
data communications capacity through local telecommunications lines
and internet data centers to host our servers. We have limited
access to alternative networks or services in the event of
disruptions, failures or other problems with China’s internet
infrastructure or the fixed telecommunications networks provided by
telecommunication service providers. With the expansion of our
business, we may be required to upgrade our technology and
infrastructure to keep up with the increasing traffic on our
platform. We cannot assure you that the internet infrastructure and
the fixed telecommunications networks in China will be able to
support the demands associated with the continued growth in
internet usage.
In
addition, we have no control over the costs of the services
provided by telecommunication service providers. If the prices we
pay for telecommunications and internet services rise
significantly, our results of operations may be adversely affected.
Furthermore, if internet access fees or other charges to internet
users increase, our user traffic may decline and our business may
be harmed.
Any significant disruption in service on our platform or in our
computer systems, including events beyond our control, could
prevent us from processing payments or posting loans on our
marketplace, reduce the attractiveness of our online products and
result in a loss of users.
In the
event of an outage affecting our internet-based businesses and
physical data loss, our ability to perform our servicing
obligations, process payments, process applications or make loans
available to investors would be materially and adversely affected.
The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our
platforms and our underlying network infrastructure are critical to
our operations, customer service, reputation and our ability to
retain existing and attract new borrowers and investors. Much of
our system hardware is hosted in a leased facility located in
Beijing that is maintained and serviced by our IT Staff. We also
periodically make backups to servers located at a separate facility
also located in Beijing. Some internal systems are hosted on
servers at our headquarters in Shijiazhuang, which would also
disrupt our operations if affected. Our operations depend on our
ability to protect our systems against damage or interruption from
natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, air
quality issues, environmental conditions, computer viruses or
attempts to harm our systems, criminal acts and similar events. If
there is a lapse in service or damage to our leased Beijing
facilities or our offices in Shijiazhuang, we could experience
interruptions in our service as well as delays and additional
expense in arranging new facilities.
Any
interruptions or delays in our service, whether as a result of
third-party error, our error, natural disasters or security
breaches, whether accidental or willful, could harm our
relationships with our borrowers and investors and our reputation.
Additionally, in the event of damage or interruption, our insurance
policies may not adequately compensate us for any losses that we
may incur. Our disaster recovery plan has not been tested under
actual disaster conditions, and we may not have sufficient capacity
to recover all data and services in the event of an outage. These
factors could prevent us from processing or posting payments on
loans, damage our brand and reputation, divert our employees’
attention, subject us to liability and cause borrowers and
investors to abandon our marketplace, any of which could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our internet-based businesses and internal systems rely on software
that is highly technical, and if it contains undetected errors, our
business could be adversely affected.
Our
internet-based businesses and internal systems rely on software
that is highly technical and complex. For example, our CeraVest and
CeraPay platforms and internal systems depend on the ability of
such software to store, retrieve, process and manage immense
amounts of data. The software on which we rely has contained, and
may now or in the future contain, undetected errors or bugs. Some
errors may only be discovered after the code has been released for
external or internal use. Errors or other design defects within the
software on which we rely may result in a negative experience for
our customers, delay introductions of new features or enhancements,
result in errors or compromise our ability to protect customer data
or our intellectual property. Any errors, bugs or defects
discovered in the software on which we rely could result in harm to
our reputation, loss of customers or liability for damages, any of
which could adversely affect our business, results of operations
and financial conditions.
Competition for employees is intense, and we may not be able to
attract and retain the qualified and skilled employees needed to
support our business.
We
believe our success depends on the efforts and talent of our
employees, including risk management, software engineering,
financial and marketing personnel. Our future success depends on
our continued ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain
qualified and skilled employees. Competition for highly skilled
technical, risk management and financial personnel is extremely
intense. We may not be able to hire and retain these personnel at
compensation levels consistent with our existing compensation and
salary structure. Some of the companies with which we compete for
experienced employees have greater resources than we have and may
be able to offer more attractive terms of employment.
In
addition, we invest significant time and expenses in training our
employees, which increases their value to competitors who may seek
to recruit them. If we fail to retain our employees, we could incur
significant expenses in hiring and training their replacements, and
the quality of our services and our ability to serve borrowers and
investors could diminish, resulting in a material adverse effect to
our business.
Increases in labor costs in the PRC may adversely affect our
profitability.
The
economy in China has experienced increases in inflation and labor
costs in recent years. As a result, average wages in the PRC are
expected to continue to increase. In addition, we are required by
PRC laws and regulations to pay various statutory employee
benefits, including pension, housing fund, medical insurance,
work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity
insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of our
employees. The relevant government agencies may examine whether an
employer has made adequate payments to the statutory employee
benefits, and those employers who fail to make adequate payments
may be subject to late payment fees, fines and/or other penalties.
We expect that our labor costs, including wages and employee
benefits, will continue to increase. Unless we are able to control
our labor costs or pass on these increased labor costs to our users
by increasing the fees of our services, our financial condition and
results of operations may be adversely affected.
If we fail to promote and maintain our brand in an effective and
cost-efficient way, our ability to grow our business may be
impaired.
We
believe that developing and maintaining awareness of our brand
effectively is critical to attracting new and retaining existing
borrowers and investors to our marketplace. Successful promotion of
our brand and our ability to attract qualified borrowers and
sufficient investors depend largely on the effectiveness of our
marketing efforts and the success of the channels we use to promote
our marketplace. Our efforts to build our brand have caused us to
incur significant expenses, and it is likely that our future
marketing efforts will require us to incur significant additional
expenses. These efforts may not result in increased revenues in the
immediate future or at all and, even if they do, any increases in
revenues may not offset the expenses incurred. If we fail to
successfully promote and maintain our brand while incurring
substantial expenses, our results of operations and financial
condition would be adversely affected, which may impair our ability
to grow our business.
Any harm to our brand or reputation or any damage to the reputation
of the online finance industry may materially and adversely affect
our business and results of operations.
Enhancing
the recognition and reputation of our brand is critical to our
business and competitiveness. Factors that are vital to this
objective include but are not limited to our ability
to:
●
maintain the
quality and reliability of our platforms;
●
provide borrowers
and investors with a superior experience in our
marketplace;
●
enhance and
improve our credit assessment and decision-making
models;
●
effectively manage
and resolve borrower and investor complaints; and
●
effectively
protect personal information and privacy of borrowers and
investors.
Any
malicious or innocent negative allegation made by the media or
other parties about our company, including but not limited to our
management, business, compliance with law, financial conditions or
prospects, whether with merit or not, could severely hurt our
reputation and harm our business and operating results. As the
market for online finance in China is new and the regulatory
framework for this market is also evolving, negative publicity
about this industry has and may arise from time to time. Negative
publicity about China’s online consumer finance marketplace
industry in general may also have a negative impact on our
reputation, regardless of whether we have engaged in any
inappropriate activities.
In
addition, certain factors that may adversely affect our reputation
are beyond our control. Negative publicity about our partners,
outsourced service providers or other counterparties and any
failure by them to adequately protect the information of borrowers
and investors, to comply with applicable laws and regulations or to
otherwise meet required quality and service standards could harm
our reputation. Furthermore, any negative development in the online
finance industry, such as bankruptcies or failures of other finance
marketplaces, and especially a large number of such bankruptcies or
failures, or negative perception of the industry as a whole, such
as that arises from any failure of other finance marketplaces to
detect or prevent money laundering or other illegal activities,
even if factually incorrect or based on isolated incidents, could
compromise our image, undermine the trust and credibility we have
established and impose a negative impact on our ability to attract
new borrowers and investors. Negative developments in the online
finance industry, such as widespread borrower defaults, fraudulent
behavior and/or the closure of other online consumer finance
marketplaces, may also lead to tightened regulatory scrutiny of the
sector and limit the scope of permissible business activities that
may be conducted by online consumer finance marketplaces like us.
If any of the foregoing takes place, our business and results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Our reputation may be harmed if information supplied by borrowers
is inaccurate, misleading or incomplete, including if the borrowers
use the loan proceeds for purposes other than as originally
provided.
Borrowers
supply a variety of information to us before we grant them a loan.
Although we take steps to verify the information we receive from
borrowers, it is possible that we are unable to detect all
instances where a borrower provides false or misleading
information. Although we also take steps to ensure a borrower uses
loan proceeds for specified purposes, it is possible that we are
unable to detect all instances where a borrower may use loan
proceeds for other purposes that may involve increased risk than as
originally provided.
We may not be able to prevent others from unauthorized use of our
intellectual property, which could harm our business and
competitive position.
We
regard our trademarks, domain names, know-how, proprietary
technologies and similar intellectual property as critical to our
success, and we rely on a combination of intellectual property laws
and contractual arrangements, including confidentiality, invention
assignment and non-compete agreements with our employees and others
to protect our proprietary rights.
It is
often difficult to register, maintain and enforce intellectual
property rights in China. Statutory laws and regulations are
subject to judicial interpretation and enforcement and may not be
applied consistently due to the lack of clear guidance on statutory
interpretation. Confidentiality, invention assignment and
non-compete agreements may be breached by counterparties, and there
may not be adequate remedies available to us for any such breach.
Accordingly, we may not be able to effectively protect our
intellectual property rights or to enforce our contractual rights
in China. Preventing any unauthorized use of our intellectual
property is difficult and costly and the steps we take may be
inadequate to prevent the misappropriation of our intellectual
property. In the event that we resort to litigation to enforce our
intellectual property rights, such litigation could result in
substantial costs and a diversion of our managerial and financial
resources. We can provide no assurance that we will prevail in such
litigation. In addition, our trade secrets may be leaked or
otherwise become available to, or be independently discovered by,
our competitors. To the extent that our employees or consultants
use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us,
disputes may arise as to the rights in related know-how and
inventions. Any failure in protecting or enforcing our intellectual
property rights could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims,
which may be expensive to defend and may disrupt our business and
operations.
We
cannot be certain that our operations or any aspects of our
business do not or will not infringe upon or otherwise violate
trademarks, patents, copyrights, know-how or other intellectual
property rights held by third parties. We may be from time to time
in the future subject to legal proceedings and claims relating to
the intellectual property rights of others. In addition, there may
be third-party trademarks, patents, copyrights, know-how or other
intellectual property rights that are infringed by our products,
services or other aspects of our business without our awareness.
Holders of such intellectual property rights may seek to enforce
such intellectual property rights against us in China, the United
States or other jurisdictions. If any third-party infringement
claims are brought against us, we may be forced to divert
management’s time and other resources from our business and
operations to defend against these claims, regardless of their
merits.
Additionally,
the application and interpretation of China’s intellectual
property right laws and the procedures and standards for granting
trademarks, patents, copyrights, know-how or other intellectual
property rights in China are still evolving and are uncertain, and
we cannot assure you that PRC courts or regulatory authorities
would agree with our analysis. If we were found to have violated
the intellectual property rights of others, we may be subject to
liability for our infringement activities or may be prohibited from
using such intellectual property, and we may incur licensing fees
or be forced to develop alternatives of our own. As a result, our
business and results of operations may be materially and adversely
affected.
Store closings result in unexpected costs that could result in
write downs and expenses relating to the closings.
From
time to time, in the ordinary course of our business, we may close
certain underperforming office branches, generally based on
considerations of branch profitability, competition, strategic
factors and other considerations. Closing an office branch could
subject us to costs, including the write-down of leasehold
improvements, equipment, furniture and fixtures. In addition, we
could remain liable for future lease obligations.
The loss of any key members of the management team may impair our
ability to identify and secure new contracts with customers or
otherwise manage our business effectively.
Our
success depends, in part, on the continued contributions of our
senior management. In particular, Mr. Yong Hui Li, our Chief
Executive Officer, has been appointed by the Board of Directors to
oversee and supervise the strategic direction and overall
performance of Fincera.
Fincera
relies on its senior management to manage its business
successfully. In addition, the relationships and reputation that
members of our management team have established and maintained with
our customers contribute to our ability to maintain good customer
relations, which is important to the direct selling strategy that
we adopt. Employment contracts entered into between us and our
senior management cannot prevent our senior management from
terminating their employment, and the death, disability or
resignation of Mr. Yong Hui Li or any other member of our senior
management team may impair our ability to maintain business growth
and identify and develop new business opportunities or otherwise to
manage our business effectively.
We rely on our information technology, billing and credit control
systems, and any problems with these systems could interrupt our
operations, resulting in reduced cash flow.
Fincera’s
business cannot be managed effectively without its integrated
information technology system. Accordingly, we run various
“real time” integrated information technology
management systems for our financing business.
In
addition, sophisticated billing and credit control systems are
critical to our ability to increase revenue streams, avoid revenue
loss and potential credit problems, and bill customers in a proper
and timely manner. If adequate billing and credit control systems
and programs are unavailable, or if upgrades are delayed or not
introduced in a timely manner, or if we are unable to integrate
such systems and software programs into our billing and credit
systems, we may experience delayed billing which may negatively
affect our cash flow and the results of operations.
In case
of a failure of our data storage system, we may lose critical
operational or billing data or important email correspondence with
our customers and suppliers. Any such data stored in the core data
center may be lost if there is a lapse or failure of the disaster
recovery system in backing up these data, or if the periodic
offline backup is insufficient in frequency or scope, which may
result in reduced cash flow and reduce revenues.
Adverse economic conditions in Shijiazhuang, China that negatively
impact the demand for office space and hotel accommodations may
result in lower occupancy and rental rates for our property lease
and management business, which would adversely affect its results
of operations.
Generally
speaking, economic growth and employment levels in a local market
are important factors in determining the success of a local
property lease and management business. Since we only lease office
space and manage hotel operations in one building that is located
in Shijiazhuang, China, the economic conditions of this city are
likely to be important factors in determining the occupancy levels
and rental rates that our property lease and management business is
able to achieve. Therefore, any deterioration in the economic
conditions of Shijiazhuang may adversely affect the results of
operations of our property lease and management
business.
We face considerable competition in the leasing market and may be
unable to renew existing leases or re-let space on terms similar to
the existing leases, or we may spend significant capital in our
efforts to renew and re-let space, which may adversely affect our
results of operations.
In
addition to seeking to increase our average occupancy by leasing
current vacant space, we also concentrate our leasing efforts on
renewing existing leases. Because we compete with a number of other
developers, owners and operators of office and office-oriented,
mixed-use properties, we may be unable to renew leases with our
existing customers and, if our current customers do not renew their
leases, we may be unable to re-let the space to new customers. To
the extent that we are able to renew existing leases or re-let such
space to new customers, heightened competition resulting from
adverse market conditions may require us to utilize rent
concessions and tenant improvements to a greater extent than we
have historically. Further, changes in space utilization by our
customers due to technology, economic conditions and business
culture also affect the occupancy of our properties. As a result,
customers may seek to downsize by leasing less space from us upon
any renewal.
If our
competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates
or below the rental rates we currently charge our customers, we may
lose existing and potential customers, and we may be pressured to
reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge in order to
retain customers upon expiration of their existing leases. Even if
our customers renew their leases or we are able to re-let the
space, the terms and other costs of renewal or re-letting,
including the cost of required renovations, increased tenant
improvement allowances, leasing commissions, reduced rental rates
and other potential concessions, may be less favorable than the
terms of our current leases and could require significant capital
expenditures. From time to time, we may also agree to modify the
terms of existing leases to incentivize customers to renew their
leases. If we are unable to renew leases or re-let space in a
reasonable time, or if our rental rates decline or our tenant
improvement costs, leasing commissions or other costs increase, our
financial condition and results of operations of the property lease
and management business could be materially adversely
affected.
Bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants may decrease our revenue, net
income and available cash.
The
bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant could cause us to suffer
lower revenues and operational difficulties, including leasing the
remainder of the property. As a result, the bankruptcy or
insolvency of a major tenant could result in decreased revenue, net
income and funds available to pay our indebtedness.
We may not be successful in integrating or operating our recently
acquired hotel business.
In
August 2016 we entered into the hotel business with our acquisition
of Eastern Eagle. The profitability of this business depends on our
ability to effectively manage and integrate the acquired business
into our existing operations. In addition, the performance of the
hotel business may be affected by local economic conditions and
competition, among other factors, which may have adverse effects on
occupancy rates and on our ability to generate income from hotel
operations.
Fincera’s ability to pay dividends and utilize cash resources
of its subsidiaries is dependent upon the earnings of, and
distributions by, Fincera’s subsidiaries and
jointly-controlled enterprises, which could result in Fincera
having little if any cash available for dividends.
Fincera
is a holding company with substantially all of its business
operations conducted through its subsidiaries. Fincera paid a
special cash dividend in the amount of $0.25 per ordinary share in
February 2012. Fincera does not currently intend to pay dividends
in the near future. However, If Fincera did decide to pay
dividends, Fincera’s ability to make future dividend payments
would depend upon the receipt of dividends or distributions from
its subsidiaries. The ability of its subsidiaries to pay dividends
or other distributions may be subject to their earnings, financial
position, cash requirements and availability, applicable laws and
regulations and to restrictions on making payments to Fincera
contained in financing or other agreements. These restrictions
could reduce the amount of dividends or other distributions that
Fincera receives from its subsidiaries, which could restrict its
ability to fund its business operations and to pay dividends to its
shareholders. Fincera’s future declaration of dividends may
or may not reflect its historical declarations of dividends and
will be at the absolute discretion of the Board of
Directors.
Operating Fincera’s internet-based financial services
requires a large amount of capital and its growth may require
additional capital that may not be available on favorable terms or
at all, which could limit our ability to continue our
operations.
To the
extent that the loans we extend to customers as part of our
internet-based businesses are not fully funded by investors on our
CeraVest platform, we must find a way to fund the shortfall
ourselves. We have, in the past, entered into loan agreements in
order to raise additional capital. Although we believe that our
current cash, other loan facilities and financing arrangement with
related parties will be sufficient to meet our present and
reasonably anticipated cash needs, it may, in the future, require
additional cash resources due to changed business conditions,
implementation of our strategy to expand our branch network or
other investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. If our
own financial resources are insufficient to satisfy our capital
requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt
securities or obtain additional credit facilities. The sale of
additional equity securities could result in dilution to our
shareholders. Our existing debt service obligations do not have any
operating and financial covenants that would restrict our
operations, however, the incurrence of indebtedness would result in
increased debt service obligations and could require us to agree to
operating and financial covenants that would restrict our
operations. Financing may not be available in amounts or on terms
acceptable to us, if at all. Any failure by Fincera to raise
additional funds on terms favorable to us, or at all, could limit
our ability to expand our business operations and could harm our
overall business prospects.
A significant portion of our working capital is funded through
loans from related parties of our Chairman and CEO, Mr. Yong Hui
Li, some of which may be called by the lenders at any time, which
could materially and adversely affect Fincera’s liquidity and
Fincera’s ability to fund and expand its
business.
As of
December 31, 2016, we had outstanding borrowings from related
parties of our Chairman and Chief Executive officer, Mr. Yong Hui
Li, of approximately $307.0 million. These borrowings are interest
bearing and for various terms, and some are callable at any time by
the lenders. The lenders have not indicated to us if there is a
maximum amount they are willing to lend to us or that they will not
call the loans for repayment. In the event such lenders determine
to call these loans we will have to repay the loans from our cash
reserves or financing provided by third-party financial
institutions. There can be no assurance that we will have
sufficient cash reserves or that we could secure additional
financing from third parties on favorable terms or at all. If cash
reserves or suitable financing were not available, we would have to
divert working capital from growing our commercial leasing
business, and we would not be able to expand our commercial leasing
business as quickly as expected.
We may have difficulty adjusting our existing offerings to
customers, including introducing new products and services, which
could reduce our profits and growth.
As we
have done in the past, we plan to continue adjusting our existing
offerings to customers and to introduce new products and services
such as our CeraVest and CeraPay businesses. Any inability to
successfully modify our offerings or introduce new products and
services that meet the demands of our customers could result in
reduced profits and growth.
We do not have any business insurance coverage.
Insurance
companies in China currently do not offer as extensive an array of
insurance products as insurance companies in more developed
economies. Currently, we do not have any business liability or
disruption insurance to cover our operations. We have determined
that the costs of insuring for these risks and the difficulties
associated with acquiring such insurance on commercially reasonable
terms make it impractical for us to have such insurance. Any
uninsured business disruptions may result in our incurring
substantial costs and the diversion of resources, which could have
an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition.
Failure to make adequate contributions to various employee benefit
plans as required by PRC regulations may subject us to
penalties.
We are
required under PRC laws and regulations to participate in various
government sponsored employee benefit plans, including certain
social insurance, housing funds and other welfare-oriented payment
obligations, and contribute to the plans in amounts equal to
certain percentages of salaries, including bonuses and allowances,
of our employees up to a maximum amount specified by the local
government from time to time at locations where we operate our
businesses. The requirement of employee benefit plans has not been
implemented consistently by the local governments in China given
the different levels of economic development in different
locations. We have not made adequate employee benefit payments in
the past and we may be required to make up the contributions for
these plans as well as to pay late fees and fines. If we are
subject to late fees or fines in relation to the underpaid employee
benefits, our profitability could be adversely
affected.
If we cannot maintain our corporate culture as we grow, we could
lose the innovation, collaboration and focus that contribute to our
business.
We
believe that a critical component of our success is our corporate
culture, which we believe fosters innovation, encourages teamwork
and cultivates creativity. As we continue to develop the
infrastructure of a public company and continue to grow and change,
we may find it difficult to maintain these valuable aspects of our
corporate culture. Any failure to preserve our culture could
negatively impact our future success, including our ability to
attract and retain employees, encourage innovation and teamwork and
effectively focus on and pursue our corporate
objectives.
Our profitability will be adversely affected if we are unable to
successfully collect receivables from our commercial vehicle sales,
leasing and support business, which have been classified as
discontinued operations.
We have
discontinued our legacy truck leasing business by exiting the
leasing industry. This involves servicing the remaining leases and
collecting the outstanding amounts due to us. If we are unable to
effectively and efficiently collect these amounts, the
profitability of this discontinued business segment will be
reduced, which in turn will adversely affect our
profitability.
Risks to Fincera’s Shareholders
Because Fincera may not pay regular dividends on its ordinary
shares, shareholders will generally benefit from an investment in
Fincera’s ordinary shares only if the shares appreciate in
value.
Although
Fincera declared and paid a special cash dividend in the amount of
$0.25 per ordinary share in February 2012 to its shareholders,
Fincera has not declared any dividends since then and may not
declare or pay any regular cash dividends on its ordinary shares in
the future. Fincera currently intends to retain future earnings, if
any, for use in the operations and expansion of the business. As a
result, Fincera does not anticipate paying regular cash dividends
in the foreseeable future. Any future determination as to the
declaration and payment of cash dividends will be at the discretion
of Fincera’s Board of Directors and will depend on factors
Fincera’s Board of Directors deems relevant, including among
others, Fincera’s results of operations, financial condition
and cash requirements, business prospects, and the terms of
Fincera’s credit facilities and other financing arrangements.
If no dividends are paid, realization of a gain on a shareholder's
investments will depend solely on the appreciation of the price of
Fincera’s ordinary shares. There is no guarantee that
Fincera’s ordinary shares will appreciate in
value.
Our ordinary shares are quoted on the over the counter market,
which may limit the liquidity and price of our ordinary shares more
than if the ordinary shares were quoted or listed on a National
Securities Exchange.
Our
ordinary shares are currently quoted on the over the counter
market, as opposed to being listed on a national securities
exchange such as the Nasdaq Stock Market or the New York Stock
Exchange. Quotation of our ordinary shares on the over the counter
market limits the liquidity and price of our ordinary shares more
than if the ordinary shares were quoted or listed on a national
securities exchange. In addition, certain institutional investors
may be prohibited from purchasing our ordinary shares because the
ordinary shares are not listed on a national securities
exchange.
Yong Hui Li, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fincera,
is the beneficial owner of a substantial amount of Fincera’s
ordinary shares and Mr. Li may take actions with respect to such
shares which are not consistent with the interests of the other
shareholders.
Yong
Hui Li, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fincera,
beneficially owns approximately 81.4% of the outstanding ordinary
shares of Fincera as of the date of this Annual Report on Form
20-F, assuming that there are no other changes to the number of
ordinary shares outstanding. Mr. Li may take actions with respect
to such shares without the approval of other shareholders and which
are not consistent with the interests of the other shareholders,
including the election of the directors and other corporate actions
of Fincera such as:
●
its merger with or
into another company;
●
a sale of
substantially all of its assets; and
●
amendments to its
memorandum and articles of incorporation.
The
decisions of Mr. Li may conflict with Fincera’s interests or
the interests of Fincera’s other shareholders.
Risks Related to Fincera’s Corporate Structure and
Restrictions on its Industry
Contractual arrangements in respect of certain companies in the PRC
may be subject to challenge by the relevant governmental
authorities and may affect our investment and control over these
companies and their operations.
Foreign
ownership of internet-based businesses, such as distribution of
online information, is subject to restrictions under current PRC
laws and regulations. For example, foreign investors are not
allowed to own more than 50% of the equity interests in a
value-added telecommunication service provider (except e-commerce)
and any such foreign investor must have experience in providing
value-added telecommunications services overseas and maintain a
good track record in accordance with the Guidance Catalog of
Industries for Foreign Investment promulgated in 2007, as amended
in 2011 and in 2015, respectively, and other applicable laws and
regulations.
Since
our wholly-owned subsidiary ACG is a Cayman Islands company and it
holds the equity interests of its PRC subsidiaries indirectly
through Fancy Think Limited, a Hong Kong company, our PRC
subsidiaries are treated as foreign invested enterprises under PRC
laws and regulations. To comply with PRC laws and regulations, we
conduct our operations in China through a series of contractual
arrangements, (the “Enterprise Agreements”), entered
into with the Auto Kaiyuan Companies, Hebei Yarui Trade Co., Ltd.
(“Hebei Yarui Trading”) and Hebei Shengrong Investment
Co., Ltd. (“Hebei Shengrong Investment”, under which
with Hebei Yarui Trading are collectively known as the “AKC
Shareholders”). Pursuant to the Enterprise Agreements, we,
through our wholly-owned subsidiary ACG, have exclusive rights to
obtain the economic benefits and assume the business risks of the
Auto Kaiyuan Companies from their shareholders, and have control of
the Auto Kaiyuan Companies. The Auto Kaiyuan Companies are
considered variable interest entities, and Fincera is the primary
beneficiary. ACG’s relationships with the Auto Kaiyuan
Companies and the AKC Shareholders are governed by the Enterprise
Agreements between Hebei Chuanglian Finance Leasing Co. Ltd.
(“Chuanglian”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
ACG, and each of the Auto Kaiyuan Companies, which are the
operating companies of ACG in the PRC. The Auto Kaiyuan Companies
and their subsidiaries hold the relevant business licenses to carry
out the business (see note 21 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information).
Pursuant
to these Enterprise Agreements, we are able to consolidate the
financial results of the Auto Kaiyuan Companies, which are
accounted for as VIEs of us under the prevailing accounting
principles. There can be no assurance that the relevant
governmental authority will not challenge the validity of these
contractual arrangements or that the governmental authorities in
the PRC will not promulgate laws or regulations to invalidate such
arrangements in the future.
If
Fincera’s ownership structure, contractual arrangements and
businesses, or its PRC subsidiaries and Auto Kaiyuan Companies, are
found to be in violation of any existing or future PRC laws or
regulations, the relevant regulatory authorities would have broad
discretion in dealing with such violations,
including:
●
revoking the
business and operating licenses of Fincera’s PRC subsidiaries
or Auto Kaiyuan Companies, which business and operating licenses
are essential to the operation of Fincera’s
business;
●
confiscating
Fincera’s income or the income of its PRC subsidiaries or
Auto Kaiyuan Companies;
●
discontinuing or
restricting our operations or the operations of Fincera’s PRC
subsidiaries or Auto Kaiyuan Companies;
●
imposing
conditions or requirements with which Fincera, ACG, Fincera’s
PRC subsidiaries or Auto Kaiyuan Companies may not be able to
comply;
●
requiring Fincera,
Fincera’s PRC subsidiaries or Auto Kaiyuan Companies to
restructure their relevant ownership structure, operations or
contractual arrangements;
●
restricting or
prohibiting Fincera’s use of the proceeds from
Fincera’s initial public offering to finance its business and
operations in China; and
●
taking other
regulatory or enforcement actions that could be harmful to the
business of the Auto Kaiyuan Companies.
The
Ministry of Commerce, or MOFCOM, published a discussion draft of
the proposed Foreign Investment Law on January 19, 2015 which would
replace the three existing laws regulating foreign investment in
China (namely, the Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise
Law, the Sinoforeign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise Law and
the Wholly Foreign-invested Enterprise Law) together with their
implementation rules and ancillary regulations. The draft Foreign
Investment Law embodies an expected PRC regulatory trend to
rationalize its foreign investment regulatory regime in line with
prevailing international practice and the legislative efforts to
unify the corporate legal requirements for both foreign and
domestic investments. The draft Foreign Investment Law, if enacted
as proposed, may materially impact the entire legal framework
regulating the foreign investments in China and may also impact
viability of our current corporate structure, corporate governance
and business operations to some extent.
Among
other things, the draft Foreign Investment Law expands the
definition of foreign investment and introduces the principle of
“actual control” in determining whether a company is
considered a foreign-invested enterprise, or an FIE. As such, the
jurisdiction of incorporation of an entity is not the ultimate
determining factor as to whether or not it’s an FIE. The
draft Foreign Investment Law specifically provides that entities
established in China but “controlled” by foreign
investors will be treated as FIEs, whereas an entity set up in a
foreign jurisdiction would nonetheless be, upon market entry
clearance by the MOFCOM or its local branches, treated as a PRC
domestic investor provided that the entity is
“controlled” by PRC entities and/or citizens. In this
connection, “control” is broadly defined in the draft
law to cover, among others, having the power to exert decisive
influence, via contractual or trust arrangements, over the subject
entity’s operations, financial matters or other key aspects
of business operations. Once an entity is determined to be an FIE
and its investment amount exceeds certain thresholds or its
business operation falls within a “negative list”, to
be separately issued by the State Counsel in the future, market
entry clearance by the MOFCOM or its local braches would be
required.
It is
likely that we would not be considered as ultimately controlled by
Chinese parties. To our knowledge, ultimate beneficial owners of
our shares who are PRC nationals may not, in the aggregate, control
more than 50% of our total voting power as of March 8, 2017. The
draft Foreign Investment Law has not taken a position on what
actions will be taken with respect to the existing companies with a
VIE structure, whether or not these companies are controlled by
Chinese parties, while it is soliciting comments from the public on
this point by illustrating several possible options. Under these
varied options, a company that has a VIE structure and conducts the
business on the “negative list” at the time of
enactment of the new Foreign Investment Law has either the option
or obligation to disclose its corporate structure to the
authorities, while the authorities, after reviewing the ultimate
share control structure of the company, may either permit the
company to continue to maintain the VIE structure (if the company
is deemed ultimately controlled by PRC nationals), or require the
company to dispose of its businesses and/or VIE structure based on
circumstantial considerations. Moreover, it is uncertain whether
online lending and online payments, in which our variable interest
entities operate, will be subject to the foreign investment
restrictions or prohibitions set forth in the “negative
list” to be issued. If the enacted version of the Foreign
Investment Law and the final “negative list” mandate
further actions, such as MOFCOM market entry clearance or certain
restructuring of our corporate structure and operations, to be
completed by companies with existing VIE structure like us, we face
substantial uncertainties as to whether these actions can be timely
completed, or at all, and our business and financial condition may
be materially and adversely affected.
However,
until “The foreign investment law” is enacted, which
may take some time, the Company’s current VIE contractual
arrangement structure will not be affected.
The
draft Foreign Investment Law, if enacted as proposed, may also
materially impact our corporate governance practice and increase
our compliance costs. For instance, the draft Foreign Investment
Law imposes stringent ad hoc and periodic information reporting
requirements on foreign investors and the applicable FIEs. Aside
from investment implementation report and investment amendment
report that are required at each investment and alteration of
investment specifics, an annual report is mandatory, and large
foreign investors meeting certain criteria are required to report
on a quarterly basis. Any company found to be non-compliant with
these information reporting obligations may potentially be subject
to fines and/or administrative or criminal liabilities, and the
persons directly responsible may be subject to criminal
liabilities.
The shareholders of the Auto Kaiyuan Companies may have potential
conflicts of interest with Fincera, which may materially and
adversely affect Fincera’s business and financial
condition.
We,
through our wholly-owned subsidiary ACG, have contractual
arrangements with respect to operating the business with the Auto
Kaiyuan Companies, and the shareholders of Auto Kaiyuan Companies
are Hebei Yarui Trading and its parent company, Hebei Shengrong
Investment, companies registered in the PRC and indirectly owned by
our Chairman and CEO, Mr. Yong Hui Li. Although Auto Kaiyuan
Companies, Hebei Yarui Trading and Hebei Shengrong Investment have
given undertakings to act in the best interests of Fincera, Fincera
cannot assure you that when conflicts arise, these individuals will
act in Fincera’s best interests or that conflicts will be
resolved in Fincera’s favor.
Contractual arrangements that our wholly-owned subsidiary ACG has
entered into through its subsidiaries with the Auto Kaiyuan
Companies may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities and
a finding that Fincera, ACG or the Auto Kaiyuan Companies owe
additional taxes could substantially reduce Fincera’s
consolidated net income and the value of your
investment.
Under
PRC laws and regulations, arrangements and transactions among
related parties may be subject to audit or challenge by the PRC tax
authorities. Fincera could face adverse tax consequences if the PRC
tax authorities determine that the contractual arrangements and
transactions among its subsidiaries and the Auto Kaiyuan Companies
do not represent an arm’s length price and adjust the income
of Fincera’s subsidiaries or that of the Auto Kaiyuan
Companies in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer
pricing adjustment could, among other things, result in a
reduction, for PRC tax purposes, of expense deductions recorded by
the Auto Kaiyuan Companies, which could in turn increase their
respective tax liabilities. In addition, the PRC tax authorities
may impose late payment fees and other penalties on Fincera’s
affiliated entities for underpayment of taxes. Fincera’s
consolidated net income may be materially and adversely affected if
its affiliated entities’ tax liabilities increase or if it is
found to be subject to late payment fees or other
penalties.
General Risks Relating to Conducting Business in China
Adverse changes in political and economic policies of the PRC
government could impede the overall economic growth of China, which
could adversely affect the transportation industry and damage
Fincera’s business and prospects.
Fincera
conducts substantially all of its operations and generates all its
sales in China. Accordingly, Fincera’s business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects are affected
significantly by economic, political and legal developments in
China. The PRC economy differs from the economies of most developed
countries in many respects, including:
●
the higher level
of government involvement and regulation;
●
the early stage of
development of the market-oriented sector of the
economy;
●
the higher rate of
inflation;
●
the higher level
of control over foreign exchange; and
●
government control
over the allocation of many resources.
As the
PRC economy has been transitioning from a planned economy to a more
market-oriented economy, the PRC government has implemented various
measures to encourage economic growth and guide the allocation of
resources. While these measures may benefit the overall PRC
economy, they may also have a negative effect on
Fincera.
Although
the PRC government has in recent years implemented measures
emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reform,
the PRC government continues to exercise significant control over
economic growth in China through the allocation of resources,
controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations,
setting monetary policy and imposing policies that impact
particular industries or companies in different ways.
In the
past 20 years, the PRC has been one of the world’s fastest
growing economies measured in gross domestic product. However, in
conjunction with recent slowdowns in economies of the United States
and European Union, the growth rate in China has declined in recent
quarters. Any further adverse change in the economic conditions or
any adverse change in government policies in China could have a
material adverse effect on the overall economic growth and the
level of consumer spending in China, which in turn could lead to a
reduction in demand for automobiles and consequently have a
material adverse effect on Fincera’s business and
prospects.
The PRC legal system embodies uncertainties that could limit the
legal protections available to Fincera and its
shareholders.
Unlike
common law systems, the PRC legal system is based on written
statutes and decided legal cases have little precedential value. In
1979, the PRC government began to promulgate a comprehensive system
of laws and regulations governing economic matters in general. The
overall effect of legislation since then has been to significantly
enhance the protections afforded to various forms of foreign
investment in China. Fincera’s PRC subsidiary, Chuanglian, is
a wholly foreign-owned enterprise, and will be subject to laws and
regulations applicable to foreign investment in China in general
and laws and regulations applicable to wholly foreign-owned
enterprises in particular. Fincera’s PRC affiliated entities,
the Auto Kaiyuan Companies, will be subject to laws and regulations
governing the formation and conduct of domestic PRC companies.
Relevant PRC laws, regulations and legal requirements may change
frequently, and their interpretation and enforcement involve
uncertainties. For example, Fincera may have to resort to
administrative and court proceedings to enforce the legal
protection that Fincera enjoys either by law or contract. However,
since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant
discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and
contractual terms, it may be more difficult to evaluate the outcome
of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal
protection Fincera enjoys than under more developed legal systems.
Such uncertainties, including the inability to enforce
Fincera’s contracts and intellectual property rights, could
materially and adversely affect Fincera’s business and
operations. In addition, confidentiality protections in China may
not be as effective as in the United States or other countries.
Accordingly, Fincera cannot predict the effect of future
developments in the PRC legal system, particularly with respect to
its commercial vehicle sales servicing, leasing and support
business, including the promulgation of new laws, changes to
existing laws or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, or the
preemption of local regulations by national laws. These
uncertainties could limit the legal protections available to
Fincera and other foreign investors, including you.
Fluctuations in exchange rates could result in foreign currency
exchange losses.
Because
substantially all of our revenues, expenditures and cash are
denominated in Renminbi and we report our financial results in U.S.
dollars, appreciation or depreciation in the value of the Renminbi
relative to the U.S. dollar would affect our financial results
reported in U.S. dollars terms without giving effect to any
underlying change in our business or results of operations.
Fluctuations in the exchange rate will also affect the relative
value of earnings from and the value of any U.S. dollar-denominated
investments Fincera makes in the future.
The
value of the RMB against the U.S. dollar and other currencies may
fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in
China’s political and economic conditions and foreign
exchange policies. The conversion of RMB into foreign currencies,
including U.S. dollars, is based on rates set by the People’s
Bank of China. The PRC government allowed the RMB to appreciate by
more than 20% against the U.S. dollar between July 2005 and July
2008. Between July 2008 and June 2010, this appreciation halted and
the exchange rate between the RMB and the U.S. dollar remained
within a narrow band. Since June 2010, the RMB has fluctuated
against the U.S. dollar, at times significantly and unpredictably,
and in recent years the RMB has depreciated significantly against
the U.S. dollar. Since October 1, 2016, the RMB has joined the
International Monetary Fund (IMF)’s basket of currencies that
make up the Special Drawing Right (SDR), along with the U.S.
dollar, the Euro, the Japanese yen and the British pound. In the
fourth quarter of 2016, the RMB has depreciated significantly in
the backdrop of a surging U.S. dollar and persistent capital
outflows of China. With the development of the foreign exchange
market and progress towards interest rate liberalization and
Renminbi internationalization, the PRC government may in the future
announce further changes to the exchange rate system and there is
no guarantee that the RMB will not appreciate or depreciate
significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the future. It is
difficult to predict how market forces or PRC or U.S. government
policy may impact the exchange rate between the RMB and the U.S.
dollar in the future.
Very
limited hedging transactions are available in China to reduce our
exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date, we have not
entered into any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our
exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. While we may decide to
enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and
effectiveness of these hedging transactions may be limited and we
may not be able to successfully hedge our exposure at all. In
addition, our currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC
exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert
Renminbi into foreign currency.
Under the PRC EIT Law, we, Eastern Eagle, ACG, and/or Fancy Think
Limited , ACG’s wholly-owned subsidiary, each may be
classified as a “resident enterprise” of the PRC. Such
classification could result in tax consequences to us, our non-PRC
resident security holders and Eastern Eagle, ACG, and/or Fancy
Think Limited.
Under
the EIT Law, enterprises are classified as resident enterprises and
non-resident enterprises. An enterprise established outside of
China with its “de facto management bodies” located
within China is considered a “resident enterprise”,
meaning that it can be treated in a manner similar to a Chinese
enterprise for enterprise income tax ("EIT") purposes. The
implementing rules of the EIT Law define “de facto management
bodies” as a managing body that in practice exercises
“substantial and overall management and control over the
production and operations, personnel, accounting, and
properties” of the enterprise; however, it remains unclear
whether the PRC tax authorities would deem our managing body as
being located within China. The PRC tax authorities would determine
the PRC tax resident treatment of a foreign (non-PRC) company,
either by (i) applying for determination by tax authorities after a
self-assessment by the enterprises or (ii) determination by tax
authorities upon investigation and discovery by the tax
authorities.
If the
PRC tax authorities determine that we, Eastern Eagle, ACG, and/or
Fancy Think Limited is a “resident enterprise” for PRC
enterprise income tax purposes, a number of PRC tax consequences
could follow. First, we, Eastern Eagle, ACG, and/or Fancy Think
Limited may be subject to enterprise income tax at a rate of 25% on
our, Eastern Eagle, ACG’s, and/or Fancy Think Limited’s
worldwide taxable income, as well as PRC enterprise income tax
reporting obligations. Second, under the EIT Law and its
implementing rules, dividends paid between “qualified
resident enterprises” are exempt from enterprise income tax.
As a result, if we, Eastern Eagle, ACG, and Fancy Think Limited are
treated as PRC “resident enterprises,” all dividends to
us (through Eastern Eagle, Fancy Think Limited and ACG) would be
exempt from PRC tax.
If
Eastern Eagle and/or Fancy Think Limited were treated as a PRC
“non-resident enterprise” under the EIT Law, then
dividends that Eastern Eagle receives and/or Fancy Think Limited
receives (assuming such dividends were considered sourced within
the PRC) (i) may be subject to a 5% PRC withholding tax, provided
that Eastern Eagle and Fancy Think Limited were considered
beneficial owners of such dividend income and the treaty benefit
regarding favorable 5% withholding tax rate was granted by PRC tax
authority according to the Tax Arrangement between the PRC and the
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double
Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes
on Income (PRC-HK Tax Arrangement) and PRC domestic tax laws, or
(ii) if such PRC-HK Tax Arrangement does not apply (because the PRC
tax authorities may deem Eastern Eagle and/or Fancy Think Limited
to be a conduit not entitled to treaty benefits), may be subject to
a 10% PRC withholding tax. Similarly, if we or ACG were treated as
a PRC “non-resident enterprise” under the EIT Law, and
Eastern Eagle and/or Fancy Think Limited were treated as a PRC
“resident enterprise” under the EIT Law, then dividends
that (i) we receive from Eastern Eagle or (ii) ACG receives from
Fancy Think Limited (assuming such dividends were considered
sourced within the PRC) may be subject to a 10% PRC withholding
tax. Any such PRC withholding taxes on dividends could materially
reduce the net amount of dividends, if any, we could pay to our
shareholders.
The new
“resident enterprise” classification could result in a
situation in which a 10% PRC tax is imposed on dividends we pay to
our investors that are non-resident enterprises so long as such
non-resident enterprise investors do not have an establishment or
place of business in China or, despite the existence of such
establishment of place of business in China, the dividends we pay
are not effectively connected with such establishment or place of
business in China, to the extent that such dividends have their
sources within the PRC. In such event, we may be required to
withhold a 10% PRC tax on any dividends paid to our investors that
are non-resident enterprises. Our investors that are non-resident
enterprises also may be responsible for paying PRC tax at a rate of
10% on any gain realized from the sale or transfer of our
securities in certain circumstances. We would not, however, have an
obligation to withhold PRC tax with respect to such
gain.
To
date, the SAT has been monitoring all kinds of offshore indirect
transfers, and on February 3, 2015, the SAT released the
Announcement on Several Issues Concerning the Enterprise Income Tax
on the Indirect Transfers of Properties by Non-resident
Enterprises, as a Public Announcement ("Circular 7") to supersede
the most of rules under Circular 698. Circular 7 introduces a new
tax regime that is significant different from that under Circular
698. Firstly, it expands the transactions covered under Circular
698 (i.e. offshore indirect equity transactions) into covering
transactions involving the transfer of "China Taxable Properties" ,
which includes (i) assets attributed to an establishment in China,
(ii) immovable property in China (illustrated below as applicable
to the current transaction), and (iii) shares in Chinese resident
enterprises. Second, Circular 7 provides clearer criteria than
Circular 698 on how to assess the reasonable commercial purposes
and introduces "safe harbor" and "blacklisted" scenarios. Third,
Circular 7 encourages the transaction parties of an indirect
transfer that are neither within the Safe Harbour Scenario nor the
Blacklisted Scenario to voluntarily file a report to the in-charge
China tax authority for assessment of reasonable business purpose.
If the parties of the indirect transfer fail to file such a report,
but the indirect transfer is identified as short of reasonable
business purpose, the China tax authority will be entitled to
collect the EIT on the capital gain and also impose a heavy penalty
and a late payment interest. Circular 7 brings challenges to both
the foreign transferor and the transferee of the offshore indirect
transfer as they have to make a self-assessment on whether the
transaction should be subject to PRC taxes and to file or withhold
the PRC taxes accordingly. If the SAT’s challenge of an
indirect transfer according to Circular 7 is successful, it will
deny the existence of the offshore holding company that is used for
tax planning purposes. We (or a foreign investor) may become at
risk of being taxed under Circular 7 and may be required to expend
valuable resources to comply with Circular 7 or to establish that
we (or such foreign investor) should not be taxed under Circular 7,
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations (or such foreign
investor’s investment in us).
If any
such PRC taxes apply, a non-PRC resident security holder may be
entitled to a reduced rate of PRC taxes under an applicable income
tax treaty and/or a foreign tax credit against such security
holder’s domestic income tax liability (subject to applicable
conditions and limitations). Prospective investors should consult
with their own tax advisors regarding the applicability of any such
taxes, the effects of any applicable income tax treaties, and any
available foreign tax credits. For further information, see the
discussion in the section of this Annual Report on Form 20-F
entitled “Taxation—PRC Taxation”
below.
PRC regulation of loans and direct investment by offshore holding
companies to PRC entities may delay or prevent Fincera from making
loans to our PRC subsidiaries and PRC affiliated entity or to make
additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries, which
could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability
to fund and expand our business.
Fincera
is a Cayman Islands holding company conducting its operations in
China through its PRC subsidiaries and its PRC affiliated entities,
the Auto Kaiyuan Companies. Any loans Fincera makes to the PRC
subsidiaries cannot exceed statutory limits and must be registered
with the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, or its
local counterparts. Under applicable PRC law, the government
authorities must approve a foreign-invested enterprise’s
registered capital amount, which represents the total amount of
capital contributions made by the shareholders that have registered
with the registration authorities. In addition, the authorities
must also approve the foreign-invested enterprise’s total
investment, which represents the total statutory capitalization of
the Company, equal to the Company’s registered capital plus
the amount of loans it is permitted to borrow under the law. The
ratio of registered capital to total investment cannot be lower
than the minimum statutory requirement and the excess of the total
investment over the registered capital represents the maximum
amount of borrowings that a foreign invested enterprise is
permitted to have under PRC law. Fincera might have to make capital
contributions to the PRC subsidiaries to maintain the statutory
minimum registered capital and total investment ratio, and such
capital contributions involve uncertainties of their own, as
discussed below. Furthermore, even if Fincera makes loans to its
PRC subsidiaries that do not exceed their current maximum amount of
borrowings, Fincera will have to register each loan with SAFE or
its local counterpart for the issuance of a registration
certificate of foreign debts. In practice, it could be
time-consuming to complete such SAFE registration
process.
Any
loans Fincera makes to a PRC affiliated entity, which is treated as
a PRC domestic company rather than a foreign-invested enterprise
under PRC law, are also subject to various PRC regulations and
approvals. Under applicable PRC regulations, international
commercial loans to PRC domestic companies are subject to various
government approvals.
Fincera
cannot assure you that it will be able to complete the necessary
government registrations or obtain the necessary government
approvals on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to future
loans by Fincera to its PRC subsidiaries or PRC affiliated entities
or with respect to future capital contributions by Fincera to its
PRC subsidiaries. If Fincera fails to complete such registrations
or obtain such approvals, Fincera’s ability to capitalize or
otherwise fund its PRC operations may be negatively affected, which
could adversely and materially affect its liquidity and its ability
to fund and expand its business.
Restrictions on currency exchange may limit our ability to utilize
our revenues effectively and the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to
obtain financing.
Substantially
all of our revenues and operating expenses are denominated in
Renminbi. Restrictions on currency exchange imposed by the PRC
government may limit our ability to utilize revenues generated in
Renminbi to fund our business activities outside China, if any, or
expenditures denominated in foreign currencies. Under current PRC
regulations, Renminbi may be freely converted into foreign currency
for payments relating to “current account
transactions,” which include among other things dividend
payments and payments for the import of goods and services, by
complying with certain procedural requirements. Our PRC
subsidiaries may also retain foreign exchange in their respective
current account bank accounts, subject to a cap set by SAFE or its
local counterpart, for use in payment of international current
account transactions.
However,
conversion of Renminbi into foreign currencies, and of foreign
currencies into Renminbi, for payments relating to “capital
account transactions,” which principally includes investments
and loans, generally requires the approval of SAFE and other
relevant PRC governmental authorities. Restrictions on the
convertibility of the Renminbi for capital account transactions
could affect the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to make
investments overseas or to obtain foreign exchange through debt or
equity financing, including by means of loans or capital
contributions from the parent entity.
Any
existing and future restrictions on currency exchange may affect
the ability of our PRC subsidiaries or affiliated entities to
obtain foreign currencies, limit our ability to utilize revenues
generated in Renminbi to fund our business activities outside China
that are denominated in foreign currencies, or otherwise materially
and adversely affect our business.
In
August 2008, SAFE promulgated Circular 142, a notice regulating the
conversion by foreign investment enterprises, or FIEs, of foreign
currency into Renminbi by restricting how the converted Renminbi
may be used. Circular 142 requires that Renminbi converted
from the foreign currency-dominated capital of a FIE may only be
used for purposes within the business scope approved by the
applicable government authority and may not be used for equity
investments within the PRC unless specifically provided for
otherwise. In addition, SAFE strengthened its oversight over
the flow and use of Renminbi funds converted from the foreign
currency-dominated capital of a FIE. The use of such Renminbi
may not be changed without approval from SAFE, and may not be used
to repay Renminbi loans if the proceeds of such loans have not yet
been used. Violations of Circular 142 may result in severe
penalties, including substantial fines as set forth in the SAFE
rules.
You may experience difficulties enforcing foreign judgments or
bringing original actions in China based on U.S. judgments against
Fincera, ACG, their subsidiaries and variable interest entities,
officers, directors and shareholders, and others.
We have
appointed CT Corporation System located at 111 Eighth Avenue, 13/F,
New York, New York 10011 as our agent to receive service of process
with respect to any action brought against us in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York under the
federal securities laws of the United States or of any state in the
United States or any action brought against us in the Supreme Court
of the State of New York in the County of New York under the
securities laws of the State of New York, and intend to abide by
judgments entered by such courts in such actions.
Notwithstanding,
substantially all of Fincera’s assets are located outside of
the United States, and most of Fincera’s current directors
and executive officers reside outside of the United States. In
addition, the PRC does not have treaties providing for reciprocal
recognition and enforcement of judgments of courts with the United
States or many other countries. As a result, recognition and
enforcement in the PRC of these judgments in relation to any
matter, including United States securities laws and the laws of the
Cayman Islands, may be difficult or impossible. Furthermore, an
original action may be brought in the PRC against Fincera’s
assets, its subsidiaries, officers, directors, shareholders and
advisors only if the actions are not required to be arbitrated by
PRC law and the facts alleged in the complaint give rise to a cause
of action under PRC law. In connection with such an original
action, a PRC court may award civil liabilities, including monetary
damages.
We may qualify as a passive foreign investment company, or
“PFIC,” which could result in adverse U.S. federal
income tax consequences to U.S. investors.
In
general, we will be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year in which
either (1) at least 75% of our gross income (looking through
certain 25% or more-owned corporate subsidiaries) is passive income
or (2) at least 50% of the average value of our assets (looking
through certain 25% or more-owned corporate subsidiaries) is
attributable to assets that produce, or are held for the production
of, passive income. Passive income generally includes, without
limitation, dividends, interest, rents, royalties, and gains from
the disposition of passive assets. If we are determined to be a
PFIC for any taxable year (or portion thereof) that is included in
the holding period of a U.S. Holder (as defined in the section of
this Annual Report on Form 20-F captioned
“Taxation—United States Federal Income
Taxation—General”) of our ordinary shares, the U.S.
Holder may be subject to increased U.S. federal income tax
liability and may be subject to additional reporting requirements.
Based on the composition (and estimated values) of the assets and
the nature of the income of us and our subsidiaries for our 2016
taxable year, we may be treated as a PFIC for our 2016 taxable
year. However, since we have not performed a definitive
analysis with respect to our PFIC status for our 2016 taxable year,
there can be no assurance with respect to our status as a PFIC for
such taxable year. There also can be no assurance with respect to
our PFIC status for our current (2017) taxable year or any future
taxable year. We urge U.S. Holders to consult their own tax
advisors regarding the possible application of the PFIC rules. For
a more detailed explanation of the U.S. federal income tax
consequences of PFIC classification to U.S. Holders, see the
section of this Annual Report on Form 20-F captioned
’‘Taxation—United States Federal Income
Taxation—Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders—Passive
Foreign Investment Company Rules.”
ITEM
4. INFORMATION
ON OUR COMPANY
A.
History and Development of the Company
We were
incorporated in the Cayman Islands on October 16, 2007 under the
name “Spring Creek Acquisition Corp.” as a blank check
company formed for the purpose of acquiring, through a stock
exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business combination,
or controlling, through contractual arrangements, an operating
business, that had its principal operations in China. Our only
business operations are conducted through our wholly-owned
subsidiary, ACG. Prior to our acquisition of ACG, we had no
operating business.
ACG,
which was formerly known as “KYF Inc.”, was a holding
company incorporated in the Cayman Islands in July 2007 by Mr. Yong
Hui Li. On the date of incorporation, 1,000 ordinary shares at
$0.001 each were issued to Mr. Yong Hui Li. Mr. Yong Hui Li
subsequently transferred all of the issued and outstanding shares
to his related parties. On the date immediately prior to our
acquisition of ACG, the sole shareholder of ACG was Honest Best
Int’l Ltd., a company which was at the time wholly owned by
Ms. Yan Wang, Mr. Li’s wife. Mr. Li is currently the
sole owner of Honest Best.
On
April 9, 2009, we acquired all of the outstanding securities of
ACG, an exempt company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, from
Honest Best Int’l Ltd., resulting in ACG becoming our
wholly-owned subsidiary. Promptly after our acquisition of ACG, we
changed our name to “AutoChina International
Limited.”
In
September 2010, we established a new wholly foreign owned
enterprise in China, Ganglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd., or
Ganglian Finance Leasing, which is in the business of leasing
commercial vehicles. In December 2010, we increased the paid-in
capital of Ganglian Finance Leasing through our VIE, Kaiyuan Auto
Trade, and converted Ganglian Finance Leasing from a wholly
foreign-owned enterprise to a Chinese-foreign joint venture. In
December 2010, Hebei Chuanglian Trade Co., Ltd., or Chuanglian,
changed its name to “Hebei Chuanglian Finance Leasing Co.,
Ltd.”
On
August 30, 2012, the Company’s independent directors
approved, and the Company entered into, an equity transfer
agreement through its wholly owned subsidiary, ACG, to purchase
100% of the equity of Heat Planet Holdings Limited (“Heat
Planet”) and its subsidiaries, whose primary asset consists
of 23 floors, or over 60,000 square meters, of newly constructed
office space in the Kai Yuan Center building (the “Real
Estate Asset”). Heat Planet was controlled by the
Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Yong Hui
Li (“Mr. Li”). The total transaction value of
approximately RMB1 billion ($159.3 million) was negotiated and
approved by the Company’s Audit Committee and equals the
appraisal value that was determined by a third party appraisal of
the Real Estate Asset. Located at 5 East Main Street in
Shijiazhuang, where the Company is currently based, the 245-meter
tall Kai Yuan Center is the tallest building in Shijiazhuang and
Hebei Province and is also occupied by a Hilton Worldwide-operated
hotel. Fincera’s headquarters are located in the Kai Yuan
Center, which serves as the control center for the Company’s
operations throughout China. The Company does not occupy the entire
office space purchased, and has been leasing out the unoccupied
space, the proceeds from which are reported as rental
income.
Heat
Planet’s equity was purchased for approximately $56.4
million. In connection with the acquisition, the Company assumed
approximately $102.9 million in debt, resulting in a total
transaction value of approximately $159.3 million. The $56.4
million purchase price was payable within six months of occupation
of the Real Estate Asset, and any unpaid amounts after such six
months began to accrue interest at the one-year rate announced by
the People’s Bank of China (4.35% as of December 31, 2016).
As of December 31, 2016 approximately $4.3 million is still owed
for the acquisition of Heat Planet.
From
February 2012 to April 2015, the Company, through its VIEs and
direct holdings, established a series of subsidiaries, including
Beijing One Auto Technology, Lian Sheng Investment Co. (“Lian
Sheng Investment”), Dian Fu Bao Investments Limited, Easy
Technology Limited, Chuang Jin World Investment Limited
(“Chuang Jin World”), Hebei Remittance Guarantee
Limited (“Hebei Remittance”), Shenzhen Kaiyuan
Financial Services, and Shenzhen Kaiyuan Inclusive Financial
Services. All of these subsidiaries were established to facilitate
the Company’s internet-based operations, including a new
peer-to-peer lending platform called CeraVest and an online
payments platform for the transportation industry called
CeraPay.
In
November 2014, the Company launched its CeraPay product, which is a
proprietary online payments platform for participants in the
transportation industry that allows its users to make purchases at
participating merchants. CeraPay has features similar to
traditional credit cards, such as no fees for users if the
outstanding monthly balance is paid on time. The Company charges
service fees to merchants who accept CeraPay as a form of
payment.
In
November 2014, the Company also launched its CeraVest product,
which is a P2P lending platform that acts as an intermediary to
allow the Company to provide short-term financing primarily to SMBs
in the transportation industry, as well as source funding for the
financing from individual investors. The Company earns service fees
for loans facilitated through CeraVest.
In June
2015 the Company changed its name from AutoChina International Ltd.
to Fincera Inc. to better suit its new internet-based businesses.
Similarly, in April 2015 the Company had also changed the name of
the Kai Yuan Center to the Kai Yuan Finance
Center.
In
October 2015 the Company launched TruShip, its first ecommerce
platform, which allows trucking industry merchants, such as
dealerships and leasing companies, to establish online store-fronts
and conveniently conduct sales transactions through
CeraPay.
In
January 2016 the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary Chuangjie
Trading was wound up. In March 2016 the Company’s
wholly-owned subsidiary Lian Sheng Investment was wound up and
ownership of Dian Fu Bao Investment was transferred from Chuanglian
to Kaiyuan Auto Trade Group.
In
March 2016, the Company launched AutoChekk, its first ecommerce
platform for the passenger vehicle industry. AutoChekk provides
consumers in China with online tools and information designed to
make researching and purchasing passenger cars or maintenance
services more convenient and affordable.
In July
2016, the Company launched PingPing, an ecommerce platform that
allows small businesses to establish an online presence while
providing an intuitive, full-service online shopping experience for
their customers.
On
October 19, 2016, the Company
closed its purchase of 100% of the
equity interest of Eastern Eagle and its subsidiaries, whose
primary asset consists of the remaining portions of the Kai Yuan
Finance Center that the company did not already own, namely 31
floors and an underground parking garage, together totaling over
119,000 square meters, which house the Shijiazhuang Hilton Hotel
(the “Building Assets”). Eastern Eagle was controlled
by the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr.
Yong Hui Li (“Mr. Li”). The total transaction value, as
adjusted to account for changes in the net asset carrying value
determined for Eastern Eagle, was $409.3 million, consisting of
cash of $111.5 million and assumed liabilities of $297.8
million.
In an
effort to streamline the Company’s corporate structure,
certain companies have been eliminated. Top Auto International Inc.
was eliminated in July 2016. First Auto Limited was eliminated in
December 2016. Heat Planet is in the process of being eliminated
and its holdings were transferred to Hebei Remittance Guarantee in
November 2016.
In
December 2016, Hebei Kaiyuan Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.
(“Hebei Kaiyuan”) was replaced in our corporate
structure by Hebei Yarui Trading. The related Enterprise Agreements
involving Hebei Kaiyuan were replaced by identical agreements
involving Hebei Yarui Trading instead.
The
following chart illustrates our corporate structure as of December
31, 2016:
(1)
The
public company, quoted on the OTC QB Board under the symbol
“AUTCF”.
(2)
Eastern Eagle
International and its subsidiaries were acquired in October 2016.
Eastern Eagle holds the ownership of the hotel segment of the Kai
Yuan Finance Center building.
(3)
In
December 2016 Hebei Yarui Trading replaced Kai Yuan Real Estate in
the corporate structure.
(4)
Hebei
Xuwei Trading is an investment holding entity.
(5)
Hebei
Ruiliang Trading holds the ownership of the office segment of Kai
Yuan Finance Center building.
(6)
Hebei
Ruiliang Property Services was formed in June 2013. It engages in
property management of the Kai Yuan Finance Center.
(7)
Chuangjin World
Investment was formed in September 2014 to facilitate the CeraVest
business.
(8)
Hebei
Remittance Guarantee was formed in October 2014 to facilitate the
CeraVest business.
(9)
Hebei
Shengrong Investment is an entity 100% indirectly controlled by Mr.
Yong Hui Li, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. (“Mr.
Li”)
(10)
Hebei Xuhua Trading
is the entity that Fincera indirectly acquired control of through
contractual arrangements and which held the cash consideration paid
to Fincera in connection with its sale of its automobile dealership
business in December 2009. Currently, its main purpose is to act as
an intermediary in the faciliation process for certain CeraVest
Loans
.
(11)
Shenzhen Kaiyuan
Financial Services was formed in April 2015 to facilitate the new
internet-based businesses.
(12)
Shenzhen Kaiyuan
Inclusive Financial Services was formed in April 2015 to facilitate
the new internet-based businesses.
(13)
Dian
Fu Bao Investment was formed in August 2014 to facilitate the
CeraVest and CeraPay businesses.
(14)
Easy
Technology was formed in September 2014 and operates the CeraVest
platform.
(15)
Beijing One Auto
Technology was originally formed in February 2012 as Kaiyuan
Information Processing. It engages in developing and management of
the Companies internet-based businesses.
(16)
Ganglian Finance
Leasing was formed in September 2010 for the purpose of conducting
our leasing business. It commenced the leasing business in the
fourth quarter of 2010.
(17)
Each
truck financing center is held by a separate legal entity, most of
which are jointly owned by Kaiyuan Auto Trade Group and Hebei Xuhua
Trading.
(18)
Kaiyuan Auto Trade
Group was established in January 2008. Currently, its main purpose
is to act as an intermediary in the faciliation process for certain
CeraVest Loans
.
Fincera’s
principal executive office is located at 27/F, Kai Yuan Finance
Center, No. 5, East Main Street, Shijiazhuang, Hebei,
People’s Republic of China. Our telephone number is +86 311
8382 7688. Our principal website is located at
http://www.fincera.net. The information on our website is not part
of this Annual Report.
B.
Business Overview
Fincera
focuses on providing innovative web-based financing and ecommerce
services for small and medium-sized businesses (“SMBs”)
and individuals in China. Our goal is to promote the success of
SMBs by providing them with access to affordable credit and online
marketing tools, while at the same time providing individuals with
attractive investment opportunities and financing for retail
products. Through our product offerings, we aim to enable a new era
of inclusive finance and Offline to Online (O2O) shopping
experiences in China.
We
currently operate two distinct businesses lines: 1) internet-based
and 2) property lease and management. Our internet-based segment is
its own reportable segment. Within our property lease and
management business are two additional reportable segments: hotel
and office leasing. We are in the process of winding down our
commercial vehicle sales, leasing and support business and
insurance agency business.
From
2009 to 2015 we focused principally on our commercial vehicle
sales, leasing and support business which provides commercial
vehicle leasing solutions for small and medium-sized businesses in
China’s transportation industry. During this time we
accumulated significant knowledge and experience regarding the
transportation industry and how to effectively underwrite credit
and manage risk for its participants. Due to our experience
providing financing to customers in the commercial vehicle
industry, we have initially targeted the transportation industry
for our first internet-based products, which are: CeraVest,
CeraPay, AutoChekk, PingPing and TruShip.
Internet-based Businesses
We
classify our internet-based businesses into three categories:
financial services, payment and settlement, and
ecommerce.
Financial Services
CeraVest,
launched at the end of 2014, is our proprietary peer-to-peer
(“P2P”) lending platform, through which the Company
offers SMBs short-term, 6-month financing at competitive interest
rates. The platform’s website is
www.qingyidai.com
. Its loans
are funded through CeraVest investors, who can invest in notes
through the CeraVest platform, and by the Company for any remaining
unfunded portion.
Currently,
CeraVest loans bear interest at approximately 8.62% per annum. The
loan is guaranteed by the SMBs and 7.5% of the loan is remitted to
the Company as a security deposit. The CeraVest agreement entered
into with the borrower states that the ownership of the debt may be
transferred to CeraVest investors at the Company’s option
during the six-month loan period. The Company may transfer the
debt, partly or in full, to CeraVest investors through a transfer
agreement at a quoted rate of return which is currently
approximately 8.62% per annum and the lending period is also six
months.
In
September 2015, we launched the CeraVest Flex product, which gives
investors flexibility with respect to the term of their investment.
As opposed to the fixed 6-month term of the regular CeraVest
product, CeraVest Flex allows investors to add or withdraw funds as
they please. It transfers the underlying assets, which are CeraPay
or CeraVest receivables, to investors through a transfer agreement
at a quoted rate of approximately 8.03% per annum. The transferred
notes have either a 6 month term or no specific lending period or
maturity date. The investors, once they have purchased these notes,
are free to add to or withdraw their investment at any time by
requiring the Company to repurchase the assets from the investors.
The rate of return is fixed regardless of the holding period. The
Company adjusts the size of the underlying pool of receivables
according to the total amount of investment in CeraVest Flex. All
of the foregoing is reflected in the applicable transfer
agreements.
No
clauses in the CeraVest transfer agreements require the Company to
repurchase any default loans. However, the Company voluntarily
commits to assist the investors to eliminate investment risks, and
retain the principal and the stated interest. The Company also
voluntarily commits to repurchasing notes from investors who would
like to withdraw their funds prior to loan maturity; after which
the Company then relists these repurchased loans for sale to other
investors. All investments received are secured by the same amount
of the counterpart loans, net and other financing receivables the
Company is due from the borrowers and the CeraPay users,
respectively. We generate revenue from CeraVest primarily by
charging origination fees and from interest on the loans we
make.
Payment and Settlement
CeraPay,
launched at the end of 2014, is our proprietary online payments
platform that operates on our own closed-loop network. The
platform’s website is
www.dianfubao.com
. CeraPay
users are provided with a credit line that can be utilized at
participating CeraPay merchants or be used to pay other CeraPay
users. Having features similar to a credit card, there are no fees
(other than late fees and penalties for CeraPay users who become
delinquent on amounts borrowed) for using the CeraPay payments
service as long as any outstanding balances are paid in full each
month. We generate revenue from CeraPay primarily by charging
transaction fees, which are currently approximately 2.4%, which was
raised from 2.0% in January 2016, to merchants participating in the
network. Merchants may use CeraPay funds to make payments to other
CeraPay users or merchants or cash out the funds via transfer to a
bank account. CeraPay users are subject to an application and
credit approval process and provide guarantees and collateral
(which can include a commercial vehicle, a security deposit or real
estate) before they are provided with a credit line. CeraPay, in
conjunction with our third party payment partners, serves as the
sole online payment method for all of our ecommerce
platforms.
CeraPay
can also now be used to purchase Sinochem and PetroChina fuel
cards, which are valid for fuel purchases at all Sinochem and
PetroChina service stations. In addition, CeraPay may be used to
pay for tolls incurred at electronic toll collection (ETC) booths.
We earn money from these arrangements by collecting rebates ranging
from 1-5% from the merchants.
Ecommerce
TruShip,
launched in October 2015, is our online ecommerce platform whereby
trucking industry merchants, such as dealerships and leasing
companies, can establish an online store-front and conveniently
conduct sales transactions through CeraPay. The platform’s
website is
www.che001.com
. In December
2015, the TruShip Logistics shipping marketplace was launched on
the platform. It allows participants in China’s fragmented
long-haul trucking industry to publish, browse, and connect on
shipping jobs across the country at no cost. Payment transactions
resulting from connections made on TruShip Logistics can be
completed with CeraPay, and the subsequent data is used as
underwriting metrics for CeraVest loans to small businesses. The
primary strategic objective of TruShip is to provide our customers
with a useful transaction platform that facilitates the increased
use of CeraPay. The platform charges approximately 0.2‰
facilitation fees to the registered merchants for each successful
transaction conducted with the customers.
AutoChekk,
launched in March 2016, is our ecommerce platform for the passenger
vehicle industry. AutoChekk provides consumers in China with a
powerful and intuitive tool that makes researching and purchasing
passenger cars or maintenance services convenient and affordable.
The platform’s website is
www.chekk.com
. The platform
provides information regarding passenger cars that are available
for sale and facilitates purchases. AutoChekk also provides
consumers with search tools and a procurement platform for
maintenance services. Similar to Fincera's TruShip Logistics
feature, payment transactions resulting from connections made on
AutoChekk can be completed with CeraPay, and the resulting data
could be used as underwriting metrics for CeraVest loans to small
businesses.
PingPing,
launched in July 2016, is our ecommerce platform for small
businesses. PingPing provides businesses with an easy-to-use online
platform to establish an online presence while providing an
intuitive, full-service online shopping experience for their
customers. The platform’s website is
www.pingpw.com
. PingPing plans
to offer B2B, B2C, and real estate ecommerce services, which are
all complemented by Fincera's core financial service offerings. As
with Fincera's TruShip and AutoChekk platforms, payment
transactions are processed using CeraPay and other third-party
payment platforms, and the resulting data will be used as
underwriting metrics for CeraVest loans to small
businesses.
We also
operate a network of branch offices in 31 provinces,
municipalities, and autonomous regions across China. These branches
support local sales staff for our internet-based
businesses.
Property Lease and Management Business
We own
the Kai Yuan Finance Center, which is a 53-floor large-scale
commercial building with hotel, office and ancillary facilities,
erected on a land parcel with a site area of approximately 10,601
square meters in the central business district of Shijiazhuang,
China. The office space in the building comprises a total gross
floor area of approximately 62,972 square meters. Our corporate
headquarters is located in the building and we lease out the space
that we do not occupy (approximately 56,092 square meters). As of
December 31, 2016 approximately 64% of this space has been leased
out pursuant to leases that expire at various dates through
2021.
Hotel Business
The Kai
Yuan Finance Center also houses the Shijiazhuang Hilton Hotel. This
full-service hotel property totals over 119,000 square meters and
includes guest rooms, restaurants, conference facilities, a fitness
center, spa and an underground parking garage. The Company has
entered into a management and franchise agreement with Hilton
Worldwide Holdings Inc. to manage and operate the
hotel.
We
believe that the Kai Yuan Finance Center is one of the premiere
commercial properties in Shijiazhuang, making it highly attractive
to both office tenants and hotel guests. It is currently the
tallest building in Hebei province and is situated in a central
location next to a large luxury shopping mall, the Hebei Provincial
Museum and the Hebei Provincial Library. Its convenient location
places it steps away from one of Shijiazhuang’s main
thoroughfares, Zhongshan Road, where the city’s first subway
line is being built.
Our
Chairman and CEO has significant experience developing, owning and
operating real estate assets. We aim to continually improve the
operating results of our existing property through concentrated
leasing, asset management, cost control and customer service
efforts. We focus on meeting our customers’ needs and provide
them with cost-effective services such as build-to-suit
construction and space modification, including tenant improvements
and expansions. Our property competes for customers with similar
properties located in our market primarily on the basis of
location, rent, services provided and the design, quality,
amenities and condition of the facilities.
Our Strategy
We are
undergoing a significant business transformation. Before launching
our internet-based businesses, we considered ourselves the
preeminent provider of commercial vehicle sales, servicing and
leases in China. However, we envisioned an even larger market
opportunity and even better ways to help even more businesses
succeed and directly serve China’s growing consumer
population. Therefore, we decided to wind down our commercial
vehicle sales, leasing and support business and launch new
businesses to pursue potentially greater opportunities instead.
Thus far, we have done this by launching the online platforms
CeraVest, CeraPay and TruShip. These platforms are designed to
enhance the productivity and success of small and medium-sized
businesses. Due to our years of experience in the transportation
industry and knowledge of its participants, we have chosen to
initially target this same vertical with these new products. In
addition, we have also launched the AutoChekk and PingPing
ecommerce platforms that work in conjunction with our financial
services to create a convenient O2O shopping experience for Chinese
consumers of retail goods and passenger
vehicles.
CeraVest
primarily provides a funding solution for capital constrained small
and medium sized businesses. After they become our customers
through CeraVest, we encourage these businesses to use, and to
encourage their own customer base to use our other platforms to
conduct transactions or browse inventory. For example, CeraPay
provides a convenient and standardized payment solution for
borrowers that take out a credit line with us, while an ecommerce
platform that we provide for a particular industry vertical (i.e.
TruShip for the trucking industry) allows merchants to interact and
conduct transactions with their customers online. Together, these
platforms create powerful network effects. For example, merchants
are incentivized to conduct transactions with their customers via
CeraPay on one of our ecommerce platforms. Then for the end
consumers, we also offer financing for the purchases they make from
the merchants. By offering financial solutions to both sides of the
transaction and providing a convenient tool to facilitate it, we
are able to convert a typically offline business scenario to an
online one where rich data can be collected. We then utilize
transactional data from all of our platforms to help make
underwriting decisions for our loan products. Starting with the
industry that we are familiar with, CeraPay, CeraVest, and TruShip
together provide a comprehensive ecommerce, funding and payment
solution for trucking businesses nationwide. Replicating this
model, we are able to create the same package of solutions by
combining CeraPay and CeraVest with AutoChekk or PingPing, each
targeting a different industry vertical in which we have
operational expertise.
We
believe that our online payments platform, CeraPay will be our
primary profit driver. This is because CeraPay will be a core
payment channel for all of our ecommerce platforms and we earn
transaction fees from processing these payments. This makes the
business model highly scalable since increased transaction volumes
do not typically directly increase most operating expenses like
they would when dealing in physical products.
Given
that our internet-based businesses are relatively new, establishing
a large customer base is a top priority. We facilitate this by
leveraging our nationwide network of branch offices to promote our
new businesses. In addition, we employ various referral and
commissions strategies to gain new customers.
Our Industry
We do
not believe that the financing needs of small and medium-sized
businesses in China have effectively been met for several years.
The needs of this market have driven the growth of the P2P lending
industry. According to Wangdaizhijia, a portal for China’s
P2P lending industry, the total P2P lending market in China totaled
approximately 2,064 billion RMB in 2016, which is more than double
the 2015 market size of 982 billion RMB. According to iResearch,
the market is forecast to grow to 3,545.2 billion RMB in 2019,
representing a 4 year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of
approximately 38% per year.
The
passenger vehicle and ecommerce industries in China also have
tremendous potential. According to the China Passenger Car
Association, China has the largest passenger car market in the
world, with sales of 23.9 million cars, sports utility and
multipurpose vehicles during 2016. According to eMarketer, China
also has the largest retail ecommerce market in the world, with
2016 retail ecommerce sales expected to top $899.09
billion.
The
online payments industry in China is driven mostly by
consumer-facing payments apps such as Alipay and Tenpay and the
rise of ecommerce platforms that require such payment methods.
Payments between businesses across various industry verticals
remain an opportunity relatively uncaptured by these
consumer-facing apps. For example, we believe the heavy trucking
industry represents a huge untapped market for online payments. We
estimate there are approximately 5,000,000 heavy trucks with total
annual revenue and expense per truck of 1,000,000 RMB and 800,000
RMB, respectively. These assumptions represent a potential market
size of 9 trillion RMB in transactions per year and represent the
initial target market for our CeraPay product.
Payment
apps that offer consumer credit are also nascent products
introduced in recent years by Alipay and JD.com , around the same
time when we launched CeraPay for the trucking industry. We believe
that Internet-based consumer credit offerings present an attractive
opportunity as more traditional services such as credit cards have
a relatively low penetration in China.
Our
CeraPay and TruShip platforms currently primarily service the
trucking industry in China. According to numerous sources,
including the 2012 China Commercial Vehicle Outlook published by
ACT Research, China’s medium and heavy duty truck markets are
the largest in the world and account for over 50% of the
world’s commercial vehicle production. According to the China
Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM), there was an
all-time record of 1,017,400 heavy trucks sold in China in 2010.
Demand has slowed somewhat since then, and, in 2014, there were
742,600 heavy trucks sold according to CAAM, a decrease of 3.7%
from 2013. In 2015 there were 546,800 heavy trucks sold according
to CAAM, a decrease of 26% from 2014. In 2016 there were 733,000
heavy trucks sold according to CAAM, an increase of 34% from 2015.
We believe that demand for credit should remain strong despite
fluctuations in the business environment.
Our Customers
Our
target customers are small and medium-sized businesses and
individuals. We primarily target customers in the transportation
industry because of our experience operating in that sector.
However, we also target other industries such as retail, and plan
to continue expanding our products to other industry verticals in
the future. We are generally of the belief that most SMBs in China
are capital constrained because they are not adequately serviced by
the current financial system. This presents opportunities for us to
step in where we feel we can efficiently both provide capital and
control risk.
We also
aim to provide individuals with attractive fixed-income investment
opportunities and financing for retail and vehicle purchases. At
the present time, all individuals in China who possess an official
government-issued resident identity card are eligible to invest in
CeraVest loans. We rely heavily on referrals, word of mouth
advertising and our branch office sales staff to acquire individual
customers.
Sales and Marketing
We
primarily utilize a highly targeted multi-tiered approach to
selling and marketing our products. We employ a direct sales force,
partner with SMBs, utilize commission-only sales agents and offer a
customer referral system relying on word of mouth advertising to
market our products. For branding and promotional purposes, we
invest a small portion of our budget on ads on various traditional
and digital media sources such as news outlets, social media, app
stores, and other third party web or mobile app platforms. While we
currently rely heavily on our sale force for customer acquisition,
we expect digital and multimedia marketing to be our main channels
going forward as we build capabilities in this area.
We are
in the process of converting our commercial vehicle financing sales
and service centers into branch offices. These branch offices will
provide office space for our employees who are engaged in the
selling and marketing of our internet-based products. During this
process certain existing commercial vehicle financing sales and
service center locations will be eliminated while new branch
offices will be opened. We will also hire certain staff on a
non-salaried, commission-only basis. We feel that having a physical
presence across China is a competitive advantage at this
transitional point in our business compared to other companies
offering online products that do not.
CeraVest
borrowers must first become a franchise store before being eligible
to borrow. Franchise stores have the opportunity to promote our
products and earn incentives. Incentives include commissions and
other incentives for successful referrals of individual investors
to CeraVest or users for CeraPay. A majority of franchise stores
also become CeraVest loan borrowers, in which case the referral
incentives that we are able to offer them include increased loans
from CeraVest within a maximum credit limit as deemed appropriate
by the Company’s risk control system. We also have begun
partnering with larger corporations in a similar manner, where
these companies help us acquire more franchise store partners and
direct their own workforce to refer investors to
CeraVest.
Finally,
we provide a variety of incentives to CeraVest investors for new
customer referrals that convert to sustained investment. Because we
sell our financial products in China, where public sentiment is
wary of fraud, word of mouth referrals are the most cost effective
way for us to acquire loyal customers that trust our
brand.
Our Risk Management
We have
extensive experience underwriting credit and managing risk with
respect to small and medium-sized businesses in the transportation
industry. In order to manage the credit risk from the credit
extended to customers through CeraVest and CeraPay, we have
developed new procedures utilizing this experience. These
procedures can be divided into two parts: screening and
underwriting, and cases of non-repayment.
Screening and Underwriting
Our
initial screening process consists of standardized application and
evaluation processes that combine a mix of both manual and
automated procedures in order to carefully screen and underwrite
applicants. Businesses must first become franchise stores to be an
eligible CeraVest borrower. This process includes a legal
background check and a detailed 10-step documentation process to
collect and verify information about the customer. Thereafter,
several different criteria are used to determine if the customer is
eligible for credit and if so, the amount that is extended
including but not limited to the type of the borrower’s
business and the industry they operate in, the amount of CeraVest
deposits referred by the borrower, the amount of any unused cash
balance in the borrower’s CeraPay account and the
borrower’s transaction volume on TruShip.
CeraPay
users can be individuals or businesses. The CeraPay screening and
underwriting process for businesses is similar to that for
CeraVest. In addition, as with CeraVest, businesses must first
apply and be approved to be franchise stores. The screening process
for individuals involves a legal background check and a detailed
documentation process to collect and verify information about the
customer such as official government documents, proof of assets,
bank statements and tax returns. Individuals must also pledge
property, such as a commercial vehicle or real estate, as
collateral in order to be approved for CeraPay. Upon approval,
proprietary formulas are used to determine the amount of credit
extended.
We are
also in the process of implementing credit risk models that utilize
both internal and external data sources to rate borrowers’
credit worthiness and calculate default risk to be used in our
screening process. Since China has an underdeveloped credit rating
system, we must rely on our own proprietary models and data sources
to rate and underwrite prospective borrowers. Aside from internal
data sources such as transaction history and user activity on our
platform websites, we also purchase external data such as an
applicant’s cell phone activity, bank card activity, traffic
violations record, and highway toll data. Using a wide array of
data that we collect over time, we can optimize our risk models to
better calculate ratings and default risk.
Cases of Non-Repayment
We have
developed a standardized risk rating system for our existing
borrowers, which dictates the procedures to follow in case of
non-repayment. In these situations, a series of escalating
follow-up procedures are implemented depending on the status of the
non-repayment and the risk rating of the customer, ranging from
simple telephone reminder calls to legal action and repossession of
any collateral. Personnel at our local branch offices are typically
utilized heavily during the process due to their proximity and
familiarity with the borrower in question. After a case is
escalated past a certain threshold, our regional offices and
headquarters also provide direct supervision. Local legal counsel,
who is typically the most familiar with the specific region’s
laws, is also customarily retained to assist in the
process.
Our Strengths
Significant Experience with Small and Medium-Sized Businesses in
the Transportation Industry.
Prior to winding down our
legacy commercial vehicle business, we considered ourselves the
leading provider of commercial vehicle leases to owners and owner
operators. Over time we have accumulated significant knowledge and
experience in the industry and about its participants. This
experience includes underwriting and managing credit risk in the
sector. We have also developed a strong reputation and many
business relationships through our commercial vehicle sales,
leasing and support business. We believe this experience will be
crucial to making our new internet-based businesses successful in
the sector and others.
Our Target Markets are Very Large and Present Significant
Opportunities.
Our initial target market is large. According
to CAAM, there were approximately 733,000 heavy trucks sold in 2016
in China, making it the largest market for heavy trucks in the
world. Furthermore, we estimate this market supports approximately
9 trillion RMB in transactions per year, which our CeraPay product
directly targets. Also, according to Wangdaizhijia, the total P2P
lending market in China totaled approximately 982 billion RMB in
2015 and according to iResearch is forecast to grow to 3,545.2
billion RMB in 2019, representing a 4 year CAGR of approximately
38% per year. According to the China Passenger Car Association,
China’s passenger vehicle market is also the largest in the
world, totaling 23.9 million cars, sports utility and multipurpose
vehicles sold in 2016. According to eMarketer, China also has the
largest retail ecommerce market in the world, with 2016 retail
ecommerce sales expected to top $899.09 billion.
Our proprietary closed-loop payment network is a significant
barrier to entry.
Our CeraPay payments service is only
accepted at merchants who we have established a direct relationship
with. Since a competitor would need to establish a direct
relationship with each of the merchants that comprise the network
in order to create a similar network, this presents a significant
barrier to entry.
Our Experience Developing Proprietary Credit Controls and
Information Systems Minimizes Risk and Potential Losses.
We
have several years of experience developing standardized
underwriting and credit control procedures. We believe that this
knowledge and experience allows us to profitably service
underserved market segment with a minimum amount of risk. Our
screening and approval process helps to ensure that we only accept
customers who we believe will be able to fulfill the terms of our
loans.
Our Branch Office Network Provides us with a Strong Competitive
Advantage.
We believe that our vast branch office network
differentiates us from our competitors. Having a broad physical
presence facilitates our sales, marketing and service efforts with
customers. It also enhances our brand and recognition. We believe
that having access to a large, branch office network can be a key
consideration in our customers’ borrowing
decision.
Our Management Team has Significant Experience in Real
Estate.
In particular,
our founder has significant
experience in developing, owning, and operating real estate assets.
Through Hebei Kaiyuan Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. he has
become one of the preeminent developers of real estate in
Shijiazhuang. He leverages this expertise in owning and operating
the Kai Yuan Finance Center.
Competition
There
are a large number of P2P lending companies that operate in China
that could be considered direct competitors to our CeraVest lending
business. However, most of these competitors are not specifically
focused on specific industry verticals such as the transportation
industry like we are. Likewise, our CeraPay business faces
competition from numerous other forms of payment methods including
credit cards and debit cards, most of which are not specifically
focused on serving a specific industry. In addition, our targeted
CeraPay merchants are typically small businesses located in rural
areas who did not previously accept any forms of electronic or
online payment. There are also many online truck media platforms or
shipping marketplaces that compete directly against our TruShip
product.
We face
considerable competition for individual CeraVest investors. We
compete with a multitude of different investment products in
different asset classes. These include but are not limited to
equities, bonds, peer-to-peer loans, investment trust products,
bank savings accounts, real estate and alternative asset classes.
Our AutoChekk and PingPing ecommerce platforms also face
considerable competition against many larger and more established
platforms.
Discontinued Operations
In late
2015 we began winding down the operations of our commercial vehicle
sales, leasing and support business because we felt that our
internet-based business presented both a better opportunity and
more efficient way to operate. Our commercial vehicle sales,
leasing and support business provided commercial vehicle leasing
solutions for small and medium-sized businesses in China’s
transportation industry. We provided sales-type leases that include
after-sales service and support for Class 8 heavy trucks (gross
vehicle weight rating “GVWR” of over 33,000 lbs). Our
insurance agency business, in which we established an insurance
agency company, Shijie Kaiyuan Insurance Agency Co., Ltd
(“Kaiyuan Insurance”), to act as a direct insurance
agent in China, is part of this segment. Due to this strategic
shift, our commercial vehicle sales, leasing and support business
is presented as a discontinued operation in our financial
statements.
Corporate Information
Fincera’s
principal executive office is located at 27/F, Kai Yuan Finance
Center, No. 5, East Main Street, Shijiazhuang, Hebei,
People’s Republic of China. Our telephone number is +86 311
8382 7688. Our principal website is located at
http://www.fincera.net. The information on our website is not part
of this Annual Report.
Capital Expenditures
Our
capital expenditure primarily includes leasehold improvements of
the Kai Yuan Finance Center that we acquired in September 2012. For
fiscal 2013 we incurred $0.6 million in construction costs and
leasehold improvement for Kai Yuan Finance Center. We did not incur
any significant capital expenditures related to the Kai Yuan
Finance Center in fiscal 2014. For fiscal 2015 we incurred $1.2
million in leasehold improvement for the Kai Yuan Finance Center.
For fiscal 2016 we incurred $0.6 million in leasehold improvement
for the Kai Yuan Finance Center.
Trademarks and Intellectual Property
Fincera,
CeraPay and CeraVest are registered trademarks of the Company. We
have also been granted software copyrights in China for our mobile
applications. We have several trademark applications in China that
are pending.
Governmental Regulations
This
section sets forth a summary of the most significant rules and
regulations that affect our business activities in
China.
Since
we operate websites, a peer-to-peer lending platform and an online
payments platform, we are regulated by various government
authorities, including among others:
●
the Ministry of
Industry and Information Technology, or the MIIT, regulating the
telecommunications and telecommunications-related activities,
including, but not limited to, the internet information services
and other value-added telecommunication services;
●
the People’s
Bank of China, or the PBOC, as the central bank of China,
regulating the formation and implementation of monetary policy,
issuing the currency, supervising the commercial banks, assisting
the administration of the financing and acting as the regulator for
third party payment platforms;
●
China Banking
Regulatory Commission, or the CBRC, regulating financial
institutions, promulgating the regulations related to the
administration of financial institutions and acting as the
regulator for the online lending industry.
Regulations on Loans between Individuals
The PRC
Contract Law governs the formation, validity, performance,
enforcement and assignment of contracts. The PRC Contract Law
confirms the validity of loan agreements between individuals and
provides that the loan agreement becomes effective when the
individual lender provides the loan to the individual borrower. The
PRC Contract Law requires that the interest rates charged under the
loan agreement must not violate the applicable provisions of the
PRC laws and regulations. In accordance with the Provisions on
Several Issues Concerning Laws Applicable to Trials of Private
Lending Cases issued by the Supreme People’s Court on August
6, 2015, or the Private Lending Judicial Interpretations, which
came into effect on September 1, 2015, private lending is defined
as financing between individuals, legal entities and other
organizations. When private loans between individuals are paid by
wire transfer, through online peer-to-peer lending platforms or by
other similar means, the loan contracts between individuals are
deemed to be validated upon the deposit of funds to the
borrower’s account. In the event that the loans are made
through an online peer-to-peer lending platform and the platform
only provides intermediary services, the courts shall dismiss the
claims of the parties concerned against the platform demanding the
repayment of loans by the platform as guarantors. However, if the
online peer-to-peer lending service provider guarantees repayment
of the loans as evidenced by its web page, advertisements or other
media, or the court is provided with other proof, the
lender’s claim alleging that the peer-to-peer lending service
provider shall assume the obligations of a guarantor will be upheld
by the courts. The Private Lending Judicial Interpretations also
provide that agreements between the lender and borrower on loans
with interest rates below 24% per annum are valid and enforceable.
As to loans with interest rates per annum between 24% and 36%, if
the interest on the loans has already been paid to the lender, and
so long as such payment has not damaged the interest of the state,
the community and any third parties, the courts will turn down the
borrower’s request to demand the return of the interest
payment. If the annual interest rate of a private loan is higher
than 36%, the excess will not be enforced by the courts. The APR
for our term loans is currently approximately 8.6%, which comprises
a fixed interest rate. The interest rate component, which is
stipulated in the loan agreements, does not and is not expected to
exceed the mandatory limit for loan interest rates.
Pursuant
to the PRC Contract Law, a creditor may assign its rights under an
agreement to a third party, provided that the debtor is notified.
Upon due assignment of the creditor’s rights, the assignee is
entitled to the creditor’s rights and the debtor must perform
the relevant obligations under the agreement for the benefit of the
assignee. We operate a secondary loan market on our platform where
investors can transfer the loans they hold to other investors
before the loan reaches maturity. To facilitate the assignment of
the loans, the template loan agreement applicable to the lenders
and borrowers on our platform specifically provides that a lender
has the right to assign his/her rights under the loan agreement to
any third parties and the borrower agrees to such
assignment.
Internet Finance Laws and Regulations
The PRC
government is in the process of creating specific rules, laws and
regulations to specially regulate the online peer-to-peer lending
industry and the online payments industry. The Guidelines for
Promoting Healthy Development of Internet Finance (the
"Guidelines") that introduced the regulatory framework were
released on July 18, 2015 and temporary rules for online lending
were released on August 24, 2016; and on April 12, 2016, the
General Office of the State Council released an implementation
working plan on how to regulate and protect from internet finance
risks. There are also certain rules, laws and regulations that are
applicable, including the PRC Contract Law, the General Principles
of the Civil Law of the PRC, and related judicial interpretations
promulgated by the Supreme People’s Court.
Anti-money Laundering Regulations
The PRC
Anti-money Laundering Law, which became effective in January 2007,
sets forth the principal anti-money laundering requirements
applicable to financial institutions as well as non-financial
institutions with anti-money laundering obligations, including the
adoption of precautionary and supervisory measures, establishment
of various systems for client identification, retention of
clients’ identification information and transactions records,
and reports on large transactions and suspicious transactions.
According to the PRC Anti-money Laundering Law, financial
institutions subject to the PRC Anti-money Laundering Law include
banks, credit unions, trust investment companies, stock brokerage
companies, futures brokerage companies, insurance companies and
other financial institutions as listed and published by the State
Council, while the list of the non-financial institutions with
anti-money laundering obligations will be published by the State
Council. The PBOC and other governmental authorities issued a
series of administrative rules and regulations to specify the
anti-money laundering obligations of financial institutions and
certain non-financial institutions, such as payment institutions.
However, the State Council has not promulgated the list of the
non-financial institutions with anti-money laundering
obligations.
The
Guidelines jointly released by ten PRC regulatory agencies in July
2015, purport, among other things, to require internet finance
service providers, including online peer-to-peer lending platforms,
to comply with certain anti-money laundering requirements,
including the establishment of a customer identification program,
the monitoring and reporting of suspicious transactions, the
preservation of customer information and transaction records, and
the provision of assistance to the public security department and
judicial authority in investigations and proceedings in relation to
anti-money laundering matters. The Temporary Rules jointly issued
by four PRC regulatory agencies in August 2016 require the online
lending information intermediaries, among other things, to comply
with certain anti-money laundering obligations, including verifying
customer identification, reporting suspicious transactions and
preserving customer information and transaction records. The
Custodian Guidelines issued by PBOC in February 2017 require the
online lending platforms to set up custody accounts with commercial
banks and comply with the anti-money laundry requirements of the
relevant commercial banks.
In
cooperation with our partnering custody banks and payment
companies, we have adopted various policies and procedures, such as
internal controls and “know-your-customer” procedures,
for anti-money laundering purposes. Although we are in the process
of ensuring that all of our policies and procedures fully comply
with the requirements set forth in the Temporary Rules, we cannot
assure you that the anti-money laundering policies and procedures
we adopt will be effective in protecting our marketplace from being
exploited for money laundering purposes or will be deemed to be in
compliance with applicable anti-money laundering implementing rules
if and when adopted.
Regulations on Value-Added Telecommunication Services
The
Telecommunications Regulations promulgated by the State Council and
its related implementation rules, including the Catalog of
Classification of Telecommunications Business issued by the MIIT,
categorize various types of telecommunications and
telecommunications-related activities into basic or value-added
telecommunications services, and internet information services, or
ICP services, are classified as value-added telecommunications
businesses. In 2009, the MIIT promulgated the Administrative
Measures on Telecommunications Business Operating Licenses, which
set forth more specific provisions regarding the types of licenses
required to operate value-added telecommunications services, the
qualifications and procedures for obtaining such licenses and the
administration and supervision of such licenses. Under these
regulations, a commercial operator of value-added
telecommunications services must first obtain a license for
value-added telecommunications business, or VATS License, from the
MIIT or its provincial level counterparts.
In
September 2000, the State Council also issued the Administrative
Measures on Internet Information Services, which was amended in
January 2011. Pursuant to these measures, “internet
information services” refer to provision of internet
information to online users, and are divided into “commercial
internet information services” and “non-commercial
internet information services.” A commercial internet
information services operator must obtain a VATS License for
internet information services, or ICP License, from the relevant
government authorities before engaging in any commercial internet
information services operations in China. The ICP License has a
term of five years and can be renewed within 90 days before
expiration.
Easy
Technology has obtained an ICP license. Beijing One Auto Technology
and Dian Fu Bao Investments Limited have each applied for the
applicable ICP License for provision of commercial internet
information services issued by the applicable local
Telecommunication Administration Bureau and have the necessary file
number to operate until the final ICP license is granted. Easy
Technology, Beijing One Auto Technology and Dian Fu Bao Investments
Limited are all our consolidated variable interest entities. The
Guidelines jointly released by ten PRC regulatory agencies in July
2015, purport, among other things, to require internet finance
service providers to complete registration with the relevant local
counterpart of the MIIT in accordance with implementation
regulations that may be promulgated by the MIIT or/and the Office
for Cyberspace Affairs pursuant to the Guidelines. The Temporary
Rules issued by four PRC regulatory agencies in August 2016 require
the online lending information intermediaries, among other things,
to apply for appropriate telecommunication business license in
accordance with the relevant requirements of telecommunication
authorities subsequent to completion of the record-filing with the
local financial regulatory department. In accordance with the
Guidelines and the Temporary Rules, the relevant authorities are in
the process of making detailed implementation rules in relation to
the record-filing procedures, as well as the application procedures
for appropriate telecommunication business license by online
lending information intermediaries. We plan to apply for any
requisite telecommunication services license once the detailed
implementation rules become available.
On
September 7, 2016, MIIT released the Trial Administrative Measures
on Use, Operation and Maintenance of Internet Information Security
Management System to regulate internet-based service providers'
internet information security management systems' operation and
maintenance.
Regulations on Internet Information Security
Internet
information in China is also regulated and restricted from a
national security standpoint. The National People’s Congress,
China’s national legislative body, has enacted the Decisions
on Maintaining Internet Security, which may subject violators to
criminal punishment in China for any effort to: (i) gain improper
entry into a computer or system of strategic importance; (ii)
disseminate politically disruptive information; (iii) leak state
secrets; (iv) spread false commercial information; or (v) infringe
intellectual property rights. The Ministry of Public Security has
promulgated measures that prohibit use of the internet in ways
which, among other things, result in a leakage of state secrets or
a spread of socially destabilizing content. If an internet
information service provider violates these measures, the Ministry
of Public Security and the local security bureaus may revoke its
operating license and shut down its websites.
In
addition, the Guidelines jointly released by ten PRC regulatory
agencies in July 2015 purport, among other things, to require
internet finance service providers to improve technology security
standards, and safeguard customer and transaction information. The
Temporary Rules jointly issued by four PRC regulatory agencies in
August 2016 requires the online lending information intermediaries,
among other things, to (i) carry out grading filing and testing for
their information systems, (ii) implement thorough cyberspace
security facilities and management measures, including firewall,
intrusion detect, data encryption, and disaster recovery, etc.,
(iii) establish information technology management, technology risk
management, technology auditing and related systems, (iv) allocate
sufficient resources and implement thorough management and control
measures and technological means to ensure safe and steady
operation of their information systems, (v) protect the security of
the information of lenders and borrowers, (vi) carry out a
comprehensive security evaluation at least once every two years,
(vii) accept the information security inspection and auditing by
competent authorities, and (viii) establish or adopt
application-level disaster recovery systems and facilities
compatible with their business scales within two years after their
establishment.
Regulations on Privacy Protection
In
recent years, PRC government authorities have enacted laws and
regulations on internet use to protect personal information from
any unauthorized disclosure. Under the Several Provisions on
Regulating the Market Order of Internet Information Services,
issued by the MIIT in December 2011, an ICP service operator may
not collect any user personal information or provide any such
information to third parties without the consent of a user. An ICP
service operator must expressly inform the users of the method,
content and purpose of the collection and processing of such user
personal information and may only collect such information
necessary for the provision of its services. An ICP service
operator is also required to properly maintain the user personal
information, and in case of any leak or likely leak of the user
personal information, the ICP service operator must take immediate
remedial measures and, in severe circumstances, make an immediate
report to the telecommunications regulatory authority. In addition,
pursuant to the Decision on Strengthening the Protection of Online
Information issued by the Standing Committee of the National
People’s Congress in December 2012 and the Order for the
Protection of Telecommunication and Internet User Personal
Information issued by the MIIT in July 2013, any collection and use
of user personal information must be subject to the consent of the
user, abide by the principles of legality, rationality and
necessity and be within the specified purposes, methods and scopes.
An ICP service operator must also keep such information strictly
confidential, and is further prohibited from divulging, tampering
or destroying of any such information, or selling or providing such
information to other parties. An ICP service operator is required
to take technical and other measures to prevent the collected
personal information from any unauthorized disclosure, damage or
loss. Any violation of these laws and regulations may subject the
ICP service operator to warnings, fines, confiscation of illegal
gains, revocation of licenses, cancellation of filings, closedown
of websites or even criminal liabilities. The Guidelines jointly
released by ten PRC regulatory agencies in July 2015 also prohibit
internet finance service providers from illegally selling or
disclosing customers’ personal information. The PBOC and
other relevant regulatory authorities will jointly adopt the
implementing rules. Pursuant to the Ninth Amendment to the Criminal
Law issued by the Standing Committee of the National People’s
Congress in August 2015 and becoming effective in November, 2015,
any internet service provider that fails to fulfill the obligations
related to internet information security administration as required
by applicable laws and refuses to rectify upon orders, shall be
subject to criminal penalty for the result of (i) any dissemination
of illegal information in large scale; (ii) any severe effect due
to the leakage of the client’s information; (iii) any serious
loss of criminal evidence; or (iv) other severe situation, and any
individual or entity that (i) sells or provides personal
information to others in a way violating the applicable law, or
(ii) steals or illegally obtain any personal information, shall be
subject to criminal penalty in severe situation.
In
operating our online consumer finance marketplace, we collect
certain personal information from borrowers and investors, and also
need to share the information with our business partners such as
third-party online payment companies and loan collection service
providers for the purpose of facilitating loan transactions between
borrowers and investors over our marketplace. We have obtained
consent from the borrowers and investors on our marketplace to
collect and use their personal information, and have also
established information security systems to protect the user
information and privacy. We are currently in the process of
ensuring that our policies and procedures will be deemed to be in
full compliance with the Temporary Rules released in August
2016.
Anti-terrorism Legislation
In
December 2015 China passed its first comprehensive anti-terrorism
bill. The new laws require telecoms and Internet companies to
cooperate with the government on counter-terrorism investigations.
For example, companies are required to provide “technical
interfaces, decryption and other technical support assistance to
public security organs and state security organs conducting
prevention and investigation of terrorist activities in accordance
with law.” In addition, “Telecommunications operators
and internet service providers shall, according to provisions of
law and administrative regulations, put into practice network
security systems and information content monitoring systems,
technical prevention and safety measures, to avoid the
dissemination of information with terrorist or extremist
content.”
Government Regulations Relating to Foreign Exchange
Controls
The
principal regulation governing foreign exchange in the PRC is the
Foreign Currency Administration Rules (2008), as amended. Under
these rules, the Renminbi, the PRC’s currency, is freely
convertible for trade and service related foreign exchange
transactions (such as normal purchases and sales of goods and
services from providers in foreign countries), but not for direct
investment, loan or investment in securities outside of China
unless the prior approval of the State Administration for Foreign
Exchange, or SAFE, of the PRC is obtained. Foreign investment
enterprises, or FIEs, are required to apply to the SAFE for Foreign
Exchange Registration Certificates for FIEs. Fincera is a FIE. With
such registration certificates, which need to be renewed annually,
FIEs are allowed to open foreign currency accounts including a
basic account and capital account. Currency translation within the
scope of the basic account, such as remittance of foreign
currencies for payment of dividends, can be effected without
requiring the approval of the SAFE. Such transactions are subject
to the consent of investment banks which are authorized by the SAFE
to review basic account currency transactions. However, conversion
of currency in the capital account, including capital items such as
direct investment, loans and securities, still require approval of
the SAFE. On July 14, 2014, the SAFE issued Circular No. 37 on
Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Control on Domestic
Residents Offshore Investment and Financing and Roundtrip
Investment through Special Purpose Vehicles. Circular No. 37
confirms that the use of offshore special purpose vehicles as
holding companies for PRC investments are permitted, but proper
foreign exchange registration applications are required to be
reviewed and accepted by the SAFE.
Regulation of Foreign Currency Exchange and Dividend
Distribution
Foreign Currency Exchange
. Foreign currency exchange in the
PRC is governed by a series of regulations, including the Foreign
Currency Administrative Rules (1996), as amended, and the
Administrative Regulations Regarding Settlement, Sale and Payment
of Foreign Exchange (1996), as amended. Under these regulations,
the Renminbi is freely convertible for trade and service-related
foreign exchange transactions, but not for direct investment, loans
or investments in securities outside China without the prior
approval of the SAFE. Pursuant to the Administrative Regulations
Regarding Settlement, Sale and Payment of Foreign Exchange,
foreign-invested enterprises in China may purchase foreign exchange
without the approval of the SAFE for trade and service-related
foreign exchange transactions by providing commercial documents
evidencing these transactions. They may also retain foreign
exchange, subject to a cap approved by SAFE, to satisfy foreign
exchange liabilities or to pay dividends. However, the relevant
Chinese government authorities may limit or eliminate the ability
of foreign-invested enterprises to purchase and retain foreign
currencies in the future. In addition, foreign exchange
transactions for direct investment, loan and investment in
securities outside China are still subject to limitations and
require approvals from the SAFE.
Dividend Distribution
. The principal laws and regulations in
China governing distribution of dividends by foreign-invested
companies include:
●
The Sino-foreign
Equity Joint Venture Law (1979), as amended;
●
The Regulations
for the Implementation of the Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Law
(1983), as amended;
●
The Company Law
(2005), as amended;
●
The Foreign
Investment Enterprise Law (1995), as amended;
●
The Foreign
Investment Enterprise Law (1986), as amended.
Under
these regulations, foreign-invested enterprises in China may pay
dividends only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined
in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. In
addition, wholly foreign-owned enterprises in China are required to
set aside at least 10% of their respective accumulated profits each
year, if any, to fund certain reserve funds unless such reserve
funds have reached 50% of their respective registered capital.
These reserves are not distributable as cash
dividends.
Periodic Reporting and Audited Financial Statements
Fincera
has registered its securities under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and has reporting obligations, including the requirement to
file annual reports with the SEC. In accordance with the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
Fincera’s annual report contains financial statements audited
and reported on by Fincera’s independent registered public
accounting firm.
As a
foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, prescribing the
furnishing and content of proxy statements. In addition, we will
not be required under the Exchange Act to file current reports with
the SEC as frequently or as promptly as United States companies
whose securities are registered under the Exchange
Act.
Legal Proceedings
To the
knowledge of the Company, there is no material litigation currently
pending or, to our knowledge, contemplated against Fincera or ACG
or any of our officers or directors in their capacity as
such.
C.
Organizational Structure.
See
Item 4.A. “Information on the Company — A. History and
Development of the Company.”
D.
Property and Equipment.
Our
headquarters are located in Shijiazhuang, China, where we own the
Kai Yuan Finance Center building and occupy a portion of it. This
space has served as our headquarters since April 2013. Fincera
leases out the unoccupied space, consisting of 56,092 square
meters. Our principal offices are located at 27/F, Kai Yuan Finance
Center, No. 5 East Main Street, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province,
050011, People’s Republic of China, and its telephone number
is +86 311 8382 7688.
We
lease 2,530 square meters of office space in Beijing where our
technology development and management operations are administered.
We also lease the properties where our branch offices are
located.
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF
COMMENTS
None.
ITEM
5. OPERATING
AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
OVERVIEW
Fincera
Inc. (“Fincera,” the “Company,” or
“we”) is a holding company whose business operations
are conducted through its wholly owned subsidiaries, AutoChina
Group Inc. (“ACG”) and Eastern Eagle International Ltd.
ACG’s operations consist of the internet-based business,
which provides financing and ecommerce services for small and
medium-sized businesses and individuals in China, and the property
lease and management business, which leases out office space.
Eastern Eagle’s operations consist of hotel business which
owns the Shijiazhuang Hilton Hotel in the Kai Yuan Finance Center
building.
We were
incorporated in the Cayman Islands on October 16, 2007 under the
name “Spring Creek Acquisition Corp.” as a blank check
company formed for the purpose of acquiring, through a stock
exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business combination,
or controlling, through contractual arrangements, an operating
business, that had its principal operations in greater
China.
On
April 9, 2009, we acquired all of the outstanding securities of
ACG, an exempt company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, from
Honest Best Int’l Ltd., resulting in ACG becoming our wholly
owned subsidiary.
Prior
to our acquisition of ACG, we had no operating
business.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2016 Compared to 2015
Overview
The
year 2016 marked the second full-year of operations for our new
internet-based business segment. During the year, we also continued
winding down our legacy commercial vehicle sales, leasing and
support business and insurance agency business, which have been
classified as discontinued operations. Our revenues increased
during the period as we continued to ramp-up our internet-based
businesses. We were also able to generate a profit from our
operations. The Company classifies service charges and interest
income as part of its internet-based segment, and measures segment
performance as income from operations less provision for credit
losses, interest expenses, interest expenses of related parties,
and property and management cost. The consolidated financial data
for all periods presented is retrospectively adjusted to reflect
the acquisition of Eastern Eagle and its subsidiaries, which were
under common control with us both immediately before and after the
acquisition (refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information). Prior period amounts have
been adjusted to exclude discontinued operations (refer to Note 4
to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information).
CeraPay and CeraVest
Our
most prominent internet-based businesses experienced significant
growth during 2016. As shown in the table below, transaction volume
of CeraPay (our online credit advance and payment processing
platform) and CeraVest (our online lending platform for small
businesses) increased significantly during 2016 over the prior
year.
(RMB in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CeraPay
Transaction Volume
|
22,390.1
|
9,699.2
|
130.8
%
|
CeraVest Loans
Issued
|
4,708.3
|
2,625.9
|
79.3
%
|
CeraPay
(https://www.dianfubao.com/)
allows customers to
pay for their everyday needs at participating merchants through the
online CeraPay transaction network. With functionality similar to a
credit card, the Company issues revolving credit lines to
customers, which they can use to make purchase transactions via the
CeraPay application. Fincera earns transaction fees through its
CeraPay platform.
CeraVest (https://www.qingyidai.com/)
provides an online
lending marketplace that provides short-term operating capital for
small and medium-sized businesses. CeraVest originates loans and
sells these loans to the public. Currently, individuals may invest
on the CeraVest platform and earn an annual interest rate of up to
approximately 8.03% on a flexible term investment, or 8.62% for a
6-month investment if held to maturity. Fincera earns origination
fees on CeraVest loans.
Income
The
table below sets forth certain line items from the Company’s
Consolidated Statement of Income as a percentage of
income:
(in thousands)
|
Year ended
December
31,
2016
|
Year ended
December 31,
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
charges
|
$
71,642
|
54.3
%
|
$
32,110
|
44.1
%
|
123.1
%
|
Interest
income
|
33,976
|
25.7
%
|
14,226
|
19.5
%
|
138.8
%
|
Other
income
|
821
|
0.6
%
|
62
|
0.1
%
|
1,224.2
%
|
Property lease and
management
|
25,589
|
19.4
%
|
26,375
|
36.3
%
|
-3.0
%
|
Total
income
|
$
132,028
|
100.0
%
|
$
72,773
|
100.0
%
|
81.4
%
|
Income
for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $132.0 million, an
increase of $59.2 million from $72.8 million in the prior year
period, as a result of the ramp-up of our internet-based business
segment, in particular our CeraVest and CeraPay products, which
were launched in November 2014.
Service
charges, which represents, CeraPay’s transaction fees and
penalty and late fees, totaled $71.6 million in the year ended
December 31, 2016, an increase of $39.5 million compared to the
prior year. This was due to the significant increase in the volume
of CeraPay transactions processed. During 2015, 9.7 billion RMB
(approximately $1.6 billion) of transactions were processed through
CeraPay. During 2016, 22.4 billion RMB (approximately $3.4 billion)
of transactions were processed through CeraPay.
Interest
income, which mainly represents CeraVest origination fees, interest
earned on CeraVest loans, and penalty and late fees for CeraVest,
totaled $34.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2016, an
increase of $19.8 million compared to the prior year. This was due
to a significant increase in the volume of CeraVest loans
facilitated by the Company. During 2015 a total of 2.6 billion RMB
(approximately $422.0 million) of CeraVest loans were facilitated
by the Company. During 2016 a total of 4.7 billion RMB
(approximately $708.4 million) of CeraVest loans were facilitated
by the Company.
Other
income, which represents governmental subsidies, totaled $0.8
million in the year ended December 31, 2016, an increase of $0.7
million compared to the prior year.
Property
lease and management revenues, which represent the revenues of the
property lease and management business and consist of revenue
derived from the Kai Yuan Finance Center, which includes the
Shijiazhuang Hilton Hotel and office leasing operations, totaled
$25.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2016. This represents
a slight decrease of 3.0% compared to the prior year. During the
year ended December 31, 2016, revenues of the Shijiazhuang Hilton
Hotel were approximately $16.6 million, compared to $16.5 million
during the prior year, representing a slight increase of 0.6%.
Office leasing revenues declined primarily due to lower occupancy
rates at the Kai Yuan Finance Center. During the year ended
December 31, 2015, the average occupancy rate of the Kai Yuan
Finance Center was 86%, as compared to 74% during the year ended
December 31, 2016.
Operating Costs and Expenses
The
table below sets forth the components of our operating costs and
expenses as a percentage of income, for the periods indicated (in
thousands):
(in thousands)
|
Year ended
December
31,
2016
|
Year ended
December 31,
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
$
39,606
|
30.0
%
|
$
24,806
|
34.1
%
|
59.7
%
|
Interest expense,
related parties
|
6,231
|
4.7
%
|
6,109
|
8.4
%
|
2.0
%
|
Provision for
credit losses
|
17,490
|
13.2
%
|
10,021
|
13.8
%
|
74.5
%
|
Product development
expense
|
9,443
|
7.2
%
|
6,157
|
8.5
%
|
53.4
%
|
Property and
management cost
|
16,515
|
12.5
%
|
17,636
|
24.2
%
|
-6.4
%
|
Selling and
marketing
|
13,508
|
10.2
%
|
3,360
|
4.6
%
|
302.0
%
|
General and
administrative
|
25,945
|
19.7
%
|
16,979
|
23.3
%
|
52.8
%
|
Total operating
costs and expenses
|
$
128,738
|
97.5
%
|
$
85,068
|
116.9
%
|
51.3
%
|
Interest Expense
Interest
expense totaled $45.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,
of which $6.2 million of interest expense was incurred to related
parties: Alliance Rich, Beiguo Auto, Beiguo Mall Xinji Branch,
Hebei Kaiyuan, Hebei Ruituo Auto Trading Co., Ltd.
(“Ruituo”), Hebei Xuyuan Investment Company and
Shijiazhuang Xuheng Trade Company. It includes interest of $51,000
and $194,000 incurred for loans advanced from Shijiazhuang Xuheng
Trade Company and Hebei Xuyuan Investment Company, respectively. It
also included interest of $2.1 million, $3.1 million and $1,000
incurred for the internet-based financing from Beiguo Mall Xinji
Branch, Ruituo, and Xinji Beiguo Mall, respectively. $168,000 of
interest expense was incurred to Alliance Rich for amounts still
outstanding from the acquisition of Heat Planet, and interest of $
0.6 million for the CeraVest investors, related parties. The
increase in interest expense during the year ended December 31,
2016 as compared to the prior year was primarily due to increased
borrowings to support the growth of the internet-based
businesses.
Interest
expense totaled $30.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015,
of which $6.1 million of interest expense was incurred to related
parties. Other interest expenses increased to $39.6 million during
fiscal 2016 from $24.8 million during the prior period due
primarily to interest paid to CeraVest investors.
Provision for credit losses
From
December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016, we increased the provision
for credit losses from $10.0 million to $17.5 million. The increase
was based on the growth of our new CeraPay and CeraVest businesses,
as well as our management’s ongoing analysis of credit losses
for the corresponding other financing receivables and loans, net
due from our customers. The Company determines to collectively
assess provision for credit losses based on homogeneous risk
characteristics, and evaluates the allowance for receivables due
from CeraPay and CeraVest customers respectively. The allowance for
loan losses attributed to these loans is established via a process
that estimates the probable losses inherent in the specific
portfolio. This process includes migration analysis, a new and more
objective estimate utilized by management starting in 2016 based on
the build-up of historical data, in which historical delinquency
and credit loss experience is applied to the current aging of the
portfolio, which has led to an increase in provisions.
The
Company performs periodic and systematic detailed reviews of its
other financing receivables and loans, net, to identify credit
risks and to assess the overall collectability of those portfolios,
and may adjust its estimates on allowance of credit losses when new
circumstances arise.
Product development expense
Product
development expense totaled $9.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2016 as compared to $6.2 million for the prior year.
The increase was primarily a result of an increase in the headcount
of technical staff as compared to the prior year
period.
Property and management cost
Property
and management cost, which consists of depreciation of the Kai Yuan
Finance Center and costs associated with operating the Shijiazhuang
Hilton Hotel, totaled $16.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2016 as compared to $17.6 million for the prior year. The reduction
was due to cost control measures at the Shijiazhuang Hilton
Hotel.
Selling and marketing
Selling
and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were
$13.5 million, an increase of $10.1 million as compared to the same
period of 2015. This was mainly due to selling and marketing costs
incurred to promote the Company’s new internet-based
businesses during 2016. These costs include but are not limited to
sales commissions and salaries for sales staff.
General and administrative
General
and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016
were $25.9 million, an increase of $8.9 million as compared to the
same period of 2015. The increase was primarily due to costs
associated with establishing and running the Company’s new
internet-based businesses. These costs include but are not limited
to salaries for administrative personnel and fees from third-party
payment providers.
Income tax provision (benefit)
In the
year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded an income tax
expense of $1.3 million, as compared to an income tax benefit of
$2.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2015. This occurred
because the Company generated income from continuing operations
before income taxes during the year 2016, while it generated a loss
from continuing operations before income taxes during the year
2015.
Income (loss) from continuing operations
Income
from continuing operations in the year ended December 31, 2016 was
$2.0 million, as compared to a loss from continuing operations of
$9.4 million in year ended December 31, 2015. The increase resulted
from the ramping up of the Company’s new internet-based
businesses.
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes
Discontinued
operations consist of the Company’s commercial vehicle sales,
leasing and support business and insurance agency business (see
Note 4 to the financial statements included herewith). Income from
discontinued operations in the year ended December 31, 2016 was
$0.2 million, as compared to $8.2 million in the year ended
December 31, 2015. The decrease resulted from the winding down of
the businesses classified as discontinued operations.
Net income (loss)
Net
income in the year ended December 31, 2016 was $2.2 million, as
compared to a net loss of $1.2 million in the year ended December
31, 2015. The increase was due to the growth of the Company’s
internet-based business.
2015 Compared to 2014
Overview
The
year 2015 was a year of transition for Fincera Inc. as it marked
the first full-year of operations for our new internet-based
business segment. During the year, we also began winding down our
legacy commercial vehicle sales, leasing and support business and
insurance agency business, which have been classified as
discontinued operations. As a result of the ramp-up of our new
internet-based businesses, which is reflected in the table below,
our revenues increased substantially during the period. The Company
classifies service charges and interest income as part of its
internet-based segment, and measures segment performance as income
from operations less provision for credit losses, interest
expenses, interest expenses of related parties, and property and
management cost. Prior period amounts have been adjusted to exclude
discontinued operations (refer to Note 4 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information).
(RMB in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CeraPay
Transaction Volume
|
9,699.2
|
105.4
|
9,102.3
%
|
CeraVest Loans
Issued
|
2,625.9
|
122.2
|
2,048.9
%
|
Income
The
table below sets forth certain line items from the Company’s
Consolidated Statement of Income as a percentage of
income:
(in thousands)
|
Year ended
December
31,
2015
|
Year ended
December 31,
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
charges
|
$
32,110
|
44.1
%
|
$
301
|
1.5
%
|
10,565.8
%
|
Interest
income
|
14,226
|
19.6
%
|
195
|
1.0
%
|
7,195.4
%
|
Other
income
|
62
|
0.1
%
|
—
|
0.0
%
|
100.0
%
|
Property lease and
management
|
26,375
|
36.2
%
|
19,527
|
97.5
%
|
35.1
%
|
Total
income
|
$
72,773
|
100.0
%
|
$
20,023
|
100.0
%
|
263.4
%
|
Income
for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $72.8 million, an increase
of $52.8 million from $20.0 million in the prior year period,
primarily as a result of the ramp-up of our new internet-based
business segment, in particular our CeraVest and CeraPay products,
which were launched in November 2014. Our property lease and
management revenue also increased due to a higher percentage of
available space being leased out and increased revenues from the
Shijiazhuang Hilton Hotel.
Service
charges, which represents CeraPay’s transaction fees and
penalty and late fees, totaled $32.1 million in the year ended
December 31, 2015, an increase of $31.8 million compared to the
prior year. This was due to the significant increase in the volume
of CeraPay transactions processed, in large part since CeraPay was
only in operation for two months of fiscal 2014 as compared to all
of fiscal 2015. During 2014, 105.4 million RMB (approximately $17.2
million) of transactions were processed through CeraPay, which
commenced operations in November 2014. During 2015, 9.7 billion RMB
(approximately $1.6 billion) of transactions were processed through
CeraPay.
Interest
income, which represents CeraVest origination fees, interest earned
on CeraVest loans, and penalty and late fees for CeraVest, totaled
$14.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of
$14.0 million compared to the prior year. This was due to a
significant increase in the volume of CeraVest loans facilitated by
the Company and since CeraVest was only in operation for two months
of fiscal 2014 as compared to all of fiscal 2015. By December 31,
2014, there were 122.2 million RMB (approximately $19.9 million) of
CeraVest loans facilitated since the product launched in November
2014. During 2015 a total of 2.6 billion RMB (approximately $422.0
million) of CeraVest loans were facilitated by the
Company.
Other
income, which represents the insurance indemnity for the property
of Kai Yuan Finance Center, totaled $0.1 million in the year ended
December 31, 2015. There was no other income in the prior year
period.
Property
lease and management revenues, which represent the revenues of the
property lease and management business and consist of revenue
derived from the Kai Yuan Finance Center, which includes the
Shijiazhuang Hilton Hotel and office leasing operations, totaled
$26.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2015. This represents
an increase of 35.1% compared to the prior year due to a higher
percentage of available space in the Kai Yuan Finance Center being
leased out to tenants in addition to higher revenues from the
Shijiazhuang Hilton Hotel. During the year ended December 31, 2015,
revenues of the Shijiazhuang Hilton Hotel were approximately $16.5
million, compared to $14.6 million during the prior year,
representing an increase of 13.0%. At December 31, 2015, the
occupancy rate of the Kai Yuan Finance Center was 93%, as compared
to 72% at December 31, 2014. The property lease and management
business commenced operations during the third quarter of
2013.
Operating Costs and Expenses
The
table below sets forth the components of our operating costs and
expenses as a percentage of income, for the periods indicated (in
thousands):
(in thousands)
|
Year ended
December
31,
2015
|
Year ended
December 31,
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
$
24,806
|
34.1
%
|
$
14,530
|
72.6
%
|
70.7
%
|
Interest expense,
related parties
|
6,109
|
8.4
%
|
1,991
|
9.9
%
|
206.8
%
|
Provision for
credit losses
|
10,021
|
13.8
%
|
209
|
1.0
%
|
4,694.7
%
|
Product development
expense
|
6,157
|
8.5
%
|
3,321
|
16.6
%
|
85.4
%
|
Property and
management cost
|
17,636
|
24.2
%
|
17,360
|
86.7
%
|
1.6
%
|
Selling and
marketing
|
3,360
|
4.6
%
|
1,558
|
7.8
%
|
115.7
%
|
General and
administrative
|
16,979
|
23.3
%
|
13,353
|
66.7
%
|
27.2
%
|
Litigation
expense
|
—
|
0.0
%
|
4,350
|
21.7
%
|
-100.0
%
|
Total operating
costs and expenses
|
$
85,068
|
116.9
%
|
$
56,672
|
283.0
%
|
50.1
%
|
Interest Expense
Interest
expense totaled $30.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015,
of which $6.1 million of interest expense was incurred to related
parties: Alliance Rich, Beiguo Auto, Hebei Kaiyuan, Hebei Ruituo
Auto Trading Co., Ltd. (“Ruituo”), Hebei Xuyuan
Investment Company, Shijiazhuang Xuheng Trade Company and Xinji
Beiguo Mall. It includes interest of $301,000, $60,000 and $11,000
incurred for loans advanced from Hebei Kaiyuan, Shijiazhuang Xuheng
Trade Company and Hebei Xuyuan Investment Company, respectively. It
also included interest of $3.9 million, $67,000 and $1.6 million
incurred for the internet-based financing from Ruituo, Beiguo Auto
and Xinji Beiguo Mall, respectively. $168,000 of interest expense
was incurred to Alliance Rich for amounts still outstanding from
the acquisition of Heat Planet.
Interest
expense totaled $16.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014,
of which $2.0 million of interest expense was incurred to related
parties. Other interest expenses increased to $24.8 million during
fiscal 2015 from $14.5 million during the prior period due
primarily to interest paid to CeraVest investors. CeraVest was
launched in November 2014.
Provision for credit losses
From
December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015, we increased the provision
for credit losses from $0.2 million to $10.0 million. The increase
was based on the growth of our new CeraPay and CeraVest businesses,
as well as our management’s ongoing analysis of credit losses
for the corresponding other financing receivables and loans, net
due from our customers. The Company determines that both the other
financing receivables and loans, net represent large groups of
smaller-balance homogeneous loans to the CeraPay and CeraVest
customers based on their similar general credit risk
characteristics, and evaluates the allowance for receivables due
from CeraPay and CeraVest customers respectively. When evaluating
the credit losses, the Company normally bases it on its historical
loss experience derived from the commercial vehicle sales, leasing
and support business, which has a similar credit portfolio with the
existing Internet-based borrowers, and also makes reference to the
experience of other entities in the same business.
The
Company performs periodic and systematic detailed reviews of its
other financing receivables and loans, net, to identify credit
risks and to assess the overall collectability of those portfolios,
and may adjust its estimates on allowance of credit losses when new
circumstances arise.
Product development expense
Product
development expense totaled $6.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2015 as compared to $3.3 million for the prior year.
The increase was primarily a result of an increase in the headcount
of technical staff as compared to the prior year
period.
Property and management cost
Property
and management cost, which consists of depreciation of the Kai Yuan
Finance Center and costs associated with operating the Shijiazhuang
Hilton Hotel, totaled $17.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2015 as compared to $17.4 million for the prior year.
Selling and marketing
Selling
and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 were
$3.4 million, an increase of $1.8 million as compared to the same
period of 2014. This was mainly due to selling and marketing costs
incurred to promote the Company’s new internet-based
businesses during 2015. These costs include but are not limited to
sales commissions and salaries for sales staff.
General and administrative
General
and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015
were $17.0 million, an increase of $3.6 million as compared to the
same period of 2014. The increase was primarily due to costs
associated with establishing and running the Company’s new
internet-based businesses. These costs include but are not limited
to salaries for administrative personnel, registration fees and
fees from third-party payment providers.
Litigation expense
There
was no litigation expense during the year ended December 31, 2015.
Litigation expense totaled $4.4 million for year ended December 31,
2014. This represented the amount the Company agreed to pay to
settle the outstanding lawsuit with the SEC.
Income tax benefit
In the
year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded an income tax
benefit of $2.9 million, as compared to an income tax benefit of
$7.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2014.
Loss from continuing operations
Loss
from continuing operations in the year ended December 31, 2015 was
$9.4 million, as compared to a loss from continuing operations of
$29.3 million in year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease
resulted from the ramping up of the Company’s new
internet-based businesses.
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes
Discontinued
operations consist of the Company’s commercial vehicle sales,
leasing and support business and insurance agency business (see
Note 4 to the financial statements included herewith). Income from
discontinued operations in the year ended December 31, 2015 was
$8.2 million, as compared to $26.5 million in the year ended
December 31, 2014. The decrease resulted from the winding down of
the businesses classified as discontinued operations.
Net loss
Net
loss in the year ended December 31, 2015 was $1.2 million, as
compared to $2.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The
decrease resulted from the ramping up of the Company’s new
internet-based businesses.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Financing arrangements
The
Company’s operations have been financed primarily through
short-term funding provided by CeraVest investors, and short-term
bank borrowings from financial institutions and related parties.
The interest rates of such short-term borrowings during the periods
have ranged from 4.35% to 9.00% per annum.
As of
December 31, 2016, the Company’s outstanding borrowings from
related parties amounted to $144,000, $4.3 million, $4.3 million,
$12,000, $68.8 million, $64.0 million and $165.5 million from Mr.
Li, Alliance Rich, Hebei Kaiyuan, Honest Best Int’l Ltd.,
Smart Success Investment Limited (“Smart Success”),
Ruituo and Beiguo Mall Xinji Branch, respectively. Alliance Rich,
Hebei Kaiyuan, Honest Best Int’l Ltd. and Smart Success are
controlled by Mr. Li.
Each of
these loans was entered into to satisfy the Company’s capital
needs except for the amount due to Alliance Rich, which represented
the consideration for the acquisition of Heat Planet, and a portion
of the amount due to Smart Success, which represented the
consideration for the acquisition of Eastern Eagle. The amount due
to Alliance Rich was payable within six months of occupation of the
Kai Yuan Finance Center by the Company, which occurred in April
2013, and delivery of the audited financial statements for the five
months ended May 31, 2012 of Heat Planet, which were delivered in
December 2012, and any unpaid amounts after such six months have
begun to accrue interest at the one-year rate announced by the
People’s Bank of China (4.35% as of December 31, 2016). The
amount due to Smart Success for the acquisition of Eastern Eagle is
payable by August 8, 2017. Any unpaid amounts thereafter will begin
to accrue interest at the one-year rate announced by the
People’s Bank of China. As of December 31, 2016 approximately
$66.9 million is still owed to Smart Success for the acquisition of
Eastern Eagle. Other amounts due to Smart Success are non-interest
bearing, unsecured and due on demand by the lenders.
The
amount due to Hebei Kaiyuan was non-interest bearing, unsecured and
due on demand. In September 2011, Hebei Kaiyuan began charging
interest at 8.00% per annum on amounts owed to it. The amount due
to Mr. Li and Honest Best Int’l Ltd. were non-interest
bearing, unsecured and due on demand by the lenders. The Company
pays a financing charge of approximately 4.6% per annum on amounts
due to Beiguo Mall Xinji Branch.
The
amount due to Ruituo represented an unsecured and due on demand
amount by Ruituo bearing interest at approximately 8.00% per annum
based on the weighted average outstanding payable balances at month
end, and an unsecured long-term loan bearing interest at 4.90% per
annum based on the weighted average outstanding payable balances at
month end. The Company entered into a long-term loan agreement with
Ruituo during 2016. Ruituo provided a facility to the Company,
amounting to $72.1 million (RMB 500 million), with a period from
September 23, 2016 to September 23, 2019. As of December 31, 2016,
about $32.9 million was provided by Ruituo to the
Company.
As of
December 31, 2016, the Company had short-term bank borrowings
of $83.6 million, represented by loans from various Chinese banks,
which have terms within one year. The Company had long-term
borrowings of $95.7 million, represented by loans from two Chinese
banks, which mature in October 2023 and in December 2028. The
Company also had $8.9 million of long-term bank borrowings,
current portion, which represents the current portion of long-term
loans from two bank in the PRC. And the Company had a total of
$14.4 million of unused bank facilities, which was granted by China
Citic Bank, as of December 31, 2016.
After
taking into consideration our financing arrangements and our
existing cash resources, we believe we have adequate sources of
liquidity to meet our short-term obligations and working capital
requirements for at least the next 12 months following the filing
of this annual report. However, the Company may elect to obtain
addition funding to expand and grow its operations, which may
include borrowings from financial institutions and/or the sale of
equity.
Working Capital
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had a working capital
deficit of $81.6 million and working capital of $116.8 million,
respectively.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company increased its total
short-term borrowings, which includes its short-term bank
borrowings, current portion of long-term bank borrowings, other
payables and accrued liabilities and borrowed funds from CeraVest
investors, borrowing net funds amounting to $249.7 million. The
Company had a net increase of financing payables, related parties
of $122.1 million, during fiscal 2016. The net impact generated
additional cash for operations.
The
Company anticipates that it will have adequate sources of working
capital in the next 12 months. However, the Company may elect to
obtain addition funding to expand and grow its operations, which
may include offering debt, borrowing from financial institutions
and/or the sale of equity.
Financial Condition
The
following table sets forth our major balance sheet accounts at
December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
$
104,123
|
$
72,262
|
Other financing
receivables, net
|
295,437
|
235,349
|
Loans,
net
|
371,301
|
250,659
|
Assets of
discontinued operations
|
21,834
|
119,845
|
Property, equipment
and improvements, net
|
202,073
|
224,704
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
Short-term bank
borrowings
|
$
83,610
|
$
75,921
|
Long-term bank
borrowings, current portion
|
8,938
|
14,784
|
Long-term bank
borrowings
|
95,719
|
118,424
|
Other payables and
accrued liabilities
|
61,202
|
48,210
|
Borrowed funds from
CeraVest investor, related party
|
4,349
|
2,716
|
Borrowed funds from
CeraVest investors
|
437,594
|
202,725
|
Financing payables,
related parties
|
273,970
|
151,921
|
Long-term financing
payables, related party
|
33,028
|
-
|
Liabilities of
discontinued operations
|
4,471
|
53,032
|
Other
financing receivables, net began in November 2014 as a result of
the inception of the CeraPay payments business under which the
Company provides SMBs with an electronic form of payment with
features similar to a credit card. As the CeraPay usage and revenue
increased during the period, the balance of other financing
receivables, net increased accordingly.
Loans,
net began in November 2014 as a result of the inception of the
CeraVest P2P lending platform business under which the Company
provides short-term loans to SMBs which are partially funded by
investors through the platform. As the CeraVest business and the
amount of loans provided to SMBs have grown, the balance of loans,
net has increased accordingly.
Assets
of discontinued operations represent the current and non-current
assets of the commercial vehicle sales, leasing and support
business and insurance agency business, while Liabilities of
discontinued operations represent its current and non-current
liabilities (see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional information).
Property,
equipment and improvements decreased to $202.1 million as of
December 31, 2016, a decrease of $22.6 million, as compared with
December 31, 2015. The decrease mainly relates to depreciation on
property and equipment as well as a decline in the exchange rate
between RMB and USD.
Short-term
bank borrowings represent loans from various banks in the PRC.
Short-term bank borrowings were used for working capital and
capital expenditure purposes. The borrowings increased to $83.6
million as of December 31, 2016, from $75.9 million as of December
31, 2015, because the Company increased bank borrowings by $7.7
million during the year. The terms of the remaining outstanding
bank borrowings range from 6 months to12 months and begin to expire
in December 2017.
Long-term
bank borrowings, current portion represents the current portion of
long-term loans from two banks in the PRC. The loans were used for
working capital and capital expenditure purposes. The current
portions of the loans are due in December 2017.
Other
payables and accrued liabilities consist of the default assurance
(security deposits) received from the CeraVest borrowers, deposits
from CeraVest investors, customer deposit from tenants, salaries
payable, payables to CeraPay registered stores and other items. It
increased to $61.2 million as of December 31, 2016 from $48.2
million as of December 31, 2015, which was mainly due to the
CeraVest and CeraPay business.
Borrowed
funds from CeraVest investors began in November 2014 as a result of
the inception of the CeraVest P2P lending platform business. Since
borrowed funds from CeraVest investors represent the amounts
invested by and therefore owed to CeraVest investors, as the
CeraVest business and the amount of investment received from
investors has grown, the balance of borrowed funds from CeraVest
investors has increased accordingly.
Financing
payables, related parties are related to the financing
arrangement for the purchase of commercial vehicles by CeraVest
customers and borrowings from related parties of the Company.
Financing payables, related parties increased from $151.9 million
to $274.0 million as of December 31, 2016, an increase of $122.1
million, as compared with December 31, 2015. Such amounts were
primarily related to the payables to our related parties: Mr. Li,
Alliance Rich, Hebei Kaiyuan, Honest Best Int’l Ltd., Smart
Success, Ruituo, Beiguo Auto, Xinji Beiguo Mall and Beiguo Mall
Xinji Branch.
Long-term
financing payables, related party represented the loans provided by
Ruituo for working capital purposes. Long-term financing payables,
related parties increased from nil to $33.0 million as of December
31, 2016, an increase of $33.0 million, as compared with December
31, 2015. The loan is due in September 2019.
Liabilities
of discontinued operations represent the current and non-current
liabilities of the commercial vehicle sales, leasing, and support
business and insurance agency business (see Note 4 to the financial
statements attached herewith).
The
following table sets forth certain historical information with
respect to the Company’s statements of cash flows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities
|
$
123,300
|
$
365,863
|
$
(20,177
)
|
Net cash (used in)
investing activities
|
(243,956
)
|
(495,928
)
|
(50,582
)
|
Net cash provided
by financing activities
|
162,140
|
178,509
|
53,826
|
Effect of exchange
rate change
|
(9,623
)
|
(4,294
)
|
(532
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
$
31,861
|
$
44,150
|
$
(17,465
)
|
Operating Activities
. Net cash provided by operating
activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $123.3 million,
as compared to $365.9 million and $20.2 million of net cash used in
operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2015 and
December 31, 2014, respectively. The decrease in cash flows
provided by operating activities during fiscal 2016 was
attributable primarily to a decrease in cash provided by operating
activities – discontinued operations due to decreased
collections on outstanding commercial vehicle leases from the
Company’s discontinued commercial vehicle sales servicing,
leasing and support business.
In the
year ended December 31, 2016, operating activities generated $123.3
million of cash. During 2016, the Company had net income of $2.2
million. In addition, the Company had depreciation and amortization
of $9.0 million, an increase of provision for credit losses of
$20.8 million, an increase of restricted cash of $6.2 million, an
increase of $14.6 million of other payables and accrued
liabilities, an increase of prepaid expense and other current
assets of $2.1 million, a decrease in accounts receivable of $15.5
million, a decrease of short term net investment of $5.6 million, a
decrease of inventory of $3.2 million and a decrease of long term
net investment in sale-type leases of $60.1 million. The remaining
balance arises from changes in deferred income taxes, income tax
payable, and other items.
In the
year ended December 31, 2015, operating activities generated $365.9
million of cash. During 2015, the Company had a net loss of $1.2
million. In addition, the Company had depreciation and amortization
of $10.0 million, an increase of provision for credit losses of
$19.4 million, a decrease of restricted cash of $0.8 million, an
increase of $23.0 million of other payables and accrued
liabilities, an decrease of prepaid expense and other current
assets of $0.7 million, an increase of accounts receivable of $11.1
million, a decrease of other financing receivables from peer store,
net of $16.5 million, a decrease of short term investment of $50.1
million, and a decrease of long term net investment in sales-type
leases of $270,9 million. The remaining balance arises from changes
in deferred income taxes, income tax payable, and other
items.
In the
year ended December 31, 2014, operating activities used $20.2
million of cash. During 2014, the Company had a net loss of $2.9
million. In addition, the Company had depreciation and amortization
of $10.4 million, an increase of provision for credit losses of
$13.6 million, a decrease of restricted cash of $0.3 million, an
increase of $7.8 million of other payables and accrued liabilities,
an increase of prepaid expense and other current assets of $0.9
million, an increase of accounts receivable of $13.1 million, an
increase of other financing receivables form peer store, net of
$13.0 million, an increase of short term net investment of $57.3
million and a decrease of long term net investment in sales-type
leases of $43.0 million. The remaining balance arises from changes
in deferred income taxes, income tax payable, and other
items.
Investing Activities
. Net cash used in investing activities
was $244.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 and was
mainly attributed to an increase from change in loans of $144.7
million, an increase from change in other financing receivables of
$92.5 million, purchase of property, equipment and leasehold
improvements of $7.9 million and proceeds from sales of property,
equipment and leasehold improvements of $1.1 million. Net cash used
in investing activities was $495.9 million in the year ended
December 31, 2015 and was mainly attributed to an increase from
change in loans of $244.0 million, an increase from change in other
financing receivables of $239.7 million and purchase of property,
equipment and leasehold improvements of $12.2 million. Net cash
used in investing activities was $50.6 million in the year ended
December 31, 2014 and was mainly attributed to an increase from
change in loans of $20.0 million, an increase from other financing
receivables of $16.7 million and purchase of property, equipment
and leasehold improvements of $13.9 million.
Financing Activities
. Net cash provided by financing
activities was $162.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2016,
and net cash provided by financing activities was $178.5 million
and $53.8 million in the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014,
respectively. In the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company
received net proceeds of $260.0 million from CeraVest investors,
received proceeds of $871.8 million from its related parties,
repaid $765.6 million to its related parties and had net repayments
of bank borrowings of $46.6 million. The Company also had a capital
distribution of $157.5 million.
In the
year ended December 31, 2015, the Company received net proceeds of
$213.9 million from CeraVest investors, received proceeds of $270.7
million from its related parties, repaid $260.2 million to its
related parties and had net repayments of bank borrowings of $45.9
million.
In the
year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received net proceeds of
$0.1 million from CeraVest investors, received proceeds of $901.5
million from its related parties, repaid $943.8 million to its
related parties and had net bank borrowings of $96.0
million.
Historically,
most or all available cash is used to fund the loans, investment in
direct financing and sales-type leases, other financing
receivables, short-term net investment, inventory growth and for
capital expenditures. To the extent the investment in loans, direct
financing, sales-type leases, other financing receivables,
short-term net investment, inventory growth, and capital
expenditures exceed income from operations, the Company generally
increases the bank borrowings under its financing facilities and
from related parties and CeraVest
investors.
The
Company currently leases all of the properties where its branch
offices are located. It expects to lease the majority of the
properties where new branch offices are located.
At
December 31, 2016, the Company had $110.3 million of cash on hand,
with $107.9 million of cash held in Renminbi. On a short-term
basis, the Company’s principal sources of liquidity include
borrowed funds from CeraVest investors, income from operations,
short-term borrowings from financial institutions including other
payables, related parties and borrowings from related parties. On a
longer-term basis, the Company expects its principal sources of
liquidity to consist of borrowed funds from CeraVest investors,
income from operations, borrowings from financial institutions,
related parties and/or fixed interest term loans. Furthermore, the
Company believes, if necessary, it could raise additional capital
through the issuance of debt and equity securities. The Company
expects to use cash primarily to increase its loans, net and other
financing receivables in line with its revenue growth. We believe
that we have adequate liquidity to satisfy our capital needs for
the near term; however, we may need to raise additional capital to
maintain our high rate of growth.
Fincera’s
borrowings primarily consisted of: (i) Short-term bank borrowings;
(ii) Long-term bank borrowings; (iii) Borrowed funds from CeraVest
investors; (iv) Financing payables, related parties; and (v)
Long-term financing payables, related parties.
Short-term bank borrowings.
Short-term bank borrowings
represented loans from various financial institutions that were
used for working capital and capital expenditures purposes. The
loans from various financial institutions bear interest at rates
ranging from 4.35% to 5.22% as of December 31, 2016 and have terms
of up to one year.
Long-term bank borrowings.
Long-term bank borrowings
represented loans from two financial institutions that were used
for working capital and capital expenditures purposes. The loans
bear interest at 4.99% as of December 31, 2016, have an original
term of 14 years and are due in December 2028.
Borrowed funds from CeraVest investors.
Borrowed funds from
CeraVest investors represent amounts invested by and therefore owed
to CeraVest investors through the CeraPay platform. The loans bear
interest at up to 8.03% for the flexible term and 8.62% for fixed
term to six months.
Financing payables, related parties.
Financing payables
from related parties was primarily related to 1) the received
internet-based financings from Ruituo, a company controlled by Mr.
Li’s brother; 2) the internet-based financings from Beiguo
Mall Xinji Branch during 2016, companies affiliated with Mr. Li; 3)
the amount due to Alliance Rich, a company controlled by Mr. Li,
which represents a portion of the consideration paid in the
acquisition of Heat Planet Holdings Limited (“Heat
Planet”); 4) the amount due to Hebei Kaiyuan, a company
controlled by Mr. Li; and 4) the amount due to Smart Success, a
company controlled by Mr. Li, which represents a portion of the
consideration paid in the acquisition of Eastern
Eagle.
The
amount due to Ruituo is unsecured and due on demand by Ruituo and
bore interest at approximately 8.00% per annum, based on the
weighted average outstanding payable balances at month
end.
Mr. Li
holds 20.92% of indirect beneficial ownership in Beiguo Mall Xinji
Branch. The Company pays a financing charge of approximately 4.6%
per annum to Beiguo Mall Xinji Branch for the funds obtained due to
this financing arrangement. The financing arrangement is personally
guaranteed by Mr. Li, who has a long term business relationship
with Beiguo, on behalf of the Company. In addition, the payable
balances of each loan are unsecured and due in 180
days.
The
amount due to Alliance Rich was payable within six months of
occupation of the Kai Yuan Center by the Company, which was
completed in April 2013 and delivery of the audited financial
statements for the five months ended May 31, 2012 of Heat Planet,
which were delivered in December 2012. In October 2013, the unpaid
amount began to accrue interest at the one-year rate announced by
the People’s Bank of China (4.35% as of December 31, 2016).
As of December 31, 2016 approximately $4.3 million is still owed to
Alliance Rich for the acquisition of Heat Planet.
The
amount due to Hebei Kaiyuan was initially non-interest bearing,
unsecured and due on demand by the lender. In September 2011, Hebei
Kaiyuan began charging interest at 8.00% per annum, and amounts
owed continue to be unsecured and due on demand by the
lender.
The
amount due to Smart Success is payable by August 8, 2017. Any
unpaid amounts thereafter will begin to accrue interest at the
one-year rate announced by the People’s Bank of China. As of
December 31, 2016 approximately $66.9 million is still owed to
Smart Success for the acquisition of Eastern Eagle. Other amounts
due to Smart Success are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on
demand by the lenders.
The
Company expects to continue relying on the financing from the
related parties and believes the related parties have sufficient
capital to continue providing such financing to us in the
foreseeable future.
Long-term Financing payable, related parties.
Long-term
financing payable from related parties represent the amount due to
Ruituo, a company controlled by Mr. Li’s brother. The Company
entered into a long-term loan agreement with Ruituo during 2016 for
long-term capital needs. Ruituo provided a facility to the Company,
amounting $72.1 million (RMB 500 million), with a period from
September 23, 2016 to September 23, 2019. This long-term loan is
unsecured and bears interest at 4.90% per annum based on the
weighted average outstanding payable balances at month
end.
The
Company’s borrowings fluctuate based upon a number of
factors, including (i) income, (ii) changes in: other financing
receivables and loans, net and (iii) capital expenditures.
Historically, income from operations, as well as borrowings on the
revolving credit facilities have driven accounts and notes
receivable growth, inventory growth and capital
expenditures.
We
believe that our available cash and cash equivalents and cash
provided by operating activities, together with cash available from
borrowings, will be adequate to meet presently anticipated cash
needs for at least the next twelve months.
Cash
and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2016 are mainly held by the
Company’s subsidiaries and VIEs. These cash balances cannot
be transferred to the Company by loan or advance according to
existing PRC laws and regulations. However, these cash balances can
be utilized by the Company for its normal operations pursuant to
the Enterprise Agreements.
Regulations on Dividend Distribution
The
principal laws and regulations in China governing distribution of
dividends by foreign-invested companies include:
●
The Sino-foreign
Equity Joint Venture Law (1979), as amended;
●
The Regulations
for the Implementation of the Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Law
(1983), as amended;
●
The Sino-foreign
Cooperative Enterprise Law (1988), as amended;
●
The Detailed Rules
for the Implementation of the Sino-foreign Cooperative Enterprise
Law (1995), as amended;
●
The Foreign
Investment Enterprise Law (1986), as amended; and
●
The Regulations of
Implementation of the Foreign Investment Enterprise Law (1990), as
amended.
Under
these regulations, foreign-invested enterprises in China may pay
dividends only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined
in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. In
addition, wholly foreign-owned enterprises in China are required to
set aside at least 10% of their respective accumulated profits each
year, if any, to fund certain reserve funds unless such reserve
funds have reached 50% of their respective registered capital.
These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. Each
of our PRC subsidiaries is continuing to make contributions to
their respective reserve funds as they have not reached the 50%
threshold. We record these as contributions to equity.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have
not entered into any financial guarantees or other commitments to
guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have not
entered into any off-balance sheet derivative instruments.
Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in
assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as
credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. We do not
have any variable interest in any unconsolidated entity that
provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to us
or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services
with us.
Contractual Payment Obligations
The
following is a summary of the Company’s contractual
obligations for operations as of December 31, 2016 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
leases
|
$
475
|
$
192
|
$
283
|
$
—
|
$
—
|
Short-term bank
borrowings
|
83,610
|
83,610
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Long-term bank
borrowings
|
104,657
|
8,938
|
22,921
|
27,389
|
45,409
|
Financing payables,
related parties
|
273,970
|
273,970
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Long-term financing
payables, related party
|
33,028
|
|
33,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
495,740
|
$
366,710
|
$
56,232
|
$
27,389
|
$
45,409
|
The
Company leases certain facilities under long-term, non-cancelable
leases and month-to-month leases. These leases are accounted for as
operating leases.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See
Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
herewith.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
See
Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
herewith.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
Interest Rate Risk
Fincera’s
exposure to interest rate risk primarily relates to its outstanding
debts and interest income generated by excess cash, which is mostly
held in interest-bearing bank deposits. In addition, fixed rate
securities such as the Company’s CeraVest loans may have
their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in
interest rates. As of December 31, 2016, Fincera’s total
outstanding interest-bearing borrowings amounted to $937.2 million
with interest rates ranging from 4.35% to 9.00% per annum. The
interest rates on our outstanding debts are fixed, which limits our
exposure to
material risks due to
changes in market interest rates, and we have not used any
derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio.
However, we cannot provide assurance that we will not be exposed to
material risks due to changes in market interest rate in the
future. We may invest our cash in both fixed rate and floating rate
interest earning instruments that
carry a degree of interest rate risk.
Fixed rate securities may have their
fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest
rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than
expected if interest rates fall.
Credit Risk
Fincera
is exposed to credit risk from its cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, loans and other finance receivables. The
credit risk on cash and cash equivalents is limited because the
counterparties are recognized financial institutions. Accounts
receivable, loans and other finance receivables are subjected to
credit evaluations and evaluation analysis on the residual value of
the relevant collateral, if any. An allowance would be made, if
necessary, for estimated irrecoverable amounts by reference to past
default experience and other credit risks, if any, and by reference
to the current economic environment.
Foreign Currency Risk
Substantially
all of Fincera’s revenues and expenditures are denominated in
Renminbi. As a result, fluctuations in the exchange rate between
the U.S. dollars and Renminbi will affect Fincera’s financial
results in U.S. dollars terms without giving effect to any
underlying change in Fincera’s business or results of
operations. The value of the RMB against the U.S. dollar and other
currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things,
changes in China’s political and economic conditions and
foreign exchange policies. The conversion of RMB into foreign
currencies, including U.S. dollars, is based on rates set by the
People’s Bank of China. The PRC government allowed the RMB to
appreciate by more than 20% against the U.S. dollar between July
2005 and July 2008. Between July 2008 and June 2010, this
appreciation halted and the exchange rate between the RMB and the
U.S. dollar remained within a narrow band. Since June 2010, the RMB
has fluctuated against the U.S. dollar, at times significantly and
unpredictably, and in recent years the RMB has depreciated
significantly against the U.S. dollar. Since October 1, 2016, the
RMB has joined the International Monetary Fund (IMF)’s basket
of currencies that make up the Special Drawing Right (SDR), along
with the U.S. dollar, the Euro, the Japanese yen and the British
pound. In the fourth quarter of 2016, the RMB has depreciated
significantly in the backdrop of a surging U.S. dollar and
persistent capital outflows of China. With the development of the
foreign exchange market and progress towards interest rate
liberalization and Renminbi internationalization, the PRC
government may in the future announce further changes to the
exchange rate system and there is no guarantee that the RMB will
not appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the
U.S. dollar in the future. It is difficult to predict how market
forces or PRC or U.S. government policy may impact the exchange
rate between the RMB and the U.S. dollar in the
future.
Net
income for the year ended December 31, 2016 of RMB14.4 million is
reported as $2.2 million based on the 2016 year-to-date average
Renminbi to U.S. dollar exchange rate of 6.6344. Net income
would decrease $0.1 million to $2.1 million based on the December
31, 2016 exchange rate of 6.9370 Renminbi per U.S. dollar.
Net income would decrease $0.5 million to $1.7 million based on the
pre-July 2005 exchange rate of 8.3000 Renminbi per U.S.
dollar.
Net
loss for the year ended December 31, 2015 of RMB7.6 million is
reported as $1.2 million based on the 2015 year-to-date average
Renminbi to U.S. dollar exchange rate of 6.2245. Net loss
would decrease $0.1 million to $1.2 million based on the December
31, 2015 exchange rate of 6.4936 Renminbi per U.S. dollar.
Net loss would decrease $0.3 million to $0.9 million based on the
pre-July 2005 exchange rate of 8.3000 Renminbi per U.S.
dollar.
Net
loss for the year ended December 31, 2014 of RMB17.5 million is
reported as $2.9 million based on the 2014 year-to-date average
Renminbi to U.S. dollar exchange rate of 6.1443. Net loss
would be reported as $2.9 million based on the December 31, 2014
exchange rate of 6.1190 Renminbi per U.S. dollar. However,
net loss would decrease $0.8 million to $2.1 million based on the
pre-July 2005 exchange rate of 8.3000 Renminbi per U.S.
dollar.
Very
limited hedging transactions are available in China to reduce
Fincera’s exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date,
Fincera has not entered into any hedging transactions in an effort
to reduce its exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. While
Fincera may decide to enter into hedging transactions in the
future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedging
transactions may be limited and it may not be able to successfully
hedge its exposure at all. In addition, Fincera’s currency
exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control
regulations that restrict its ability to convert Renminbi into
foreign currency.
Seasonality
Our
first quarter (January through March) is expected to be slower for
CeraVest and CeraPay than the other quarters. This is due to the
Chinese New Year holiday, which occurs in January or February
depending on the year, and generally has an adverse effect on
business activity in the transportation sector. We expect this
trend to continue in future periods. If conditions arise that
impair transportation sector business activity during the second to
fourth quarters, the adverse effect on our revenues and operating
profit for the year could be disproportionately large.
Impact of Inflation
Inflation
has not historically been a significant factor impacting the
Company’s results.
ITEM 6.
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
A.
Directors and Senior Management.
Fincera’s
current directors, executive officers and key employees are as
follows:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Yong
Hui Li
|
|
55
|
|
Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
Lei
Chen
|
|
50
|
|
Senior
Vice President
|
Jason
Chia-Lun Wang
|
|
41
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
Xing
Wei
|
|
56
|
|
Chief
Operating Officer
|
James
Cheng-Jee Sha
|
|
67
|
|
Director
|
Diana
Chia-Huei Liu
|
|
52
|
|
Director
|
Leon
Ling Chen
|
|
53
|
|
Director
|
Spencer
Ang Li
|
|
28
|
|
VP,
Product and Director
|
Yong Hui Li
has served as Fincera’s Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer and as a member of Fincera’s Board of
Directors since April 9, 2009. Mr. Li is the founder, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of ACG and Hebei Kaiyuan Real Estate
Development Co., Ltd. (“Hebei Kaiyuan”) which was
previously the second largest shareholder of Shijiazhuang
International Building, a construction company traded on the
Shenzhen Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol CN: 000600. Mr. Li
founded Hebei Kaiyuan in November 1998, and ACG in July 2007. Mr.
Li has also served as the Chairman of Prime Acquisition Corp., a
blank check company, since its inception in February 2011 until
September 2013. From February 2001 to May 2006, Mr. Li helped
oversee Hebei Kaiyuan’s development of the largest
steel-framed construction project in Hebei Province, consisting of
residential complexes, office towers and an upscale shopping mall,
which covered over one million square feet. In 1994, Mr. Li founded
Shijiazhuang Hi-tech Zone Kaiyuan Auto Trade Co., which was a
pioneer in the commercial vehicle leasing business in Hebei
Province. He graduated from Tianjin University in June 1985 with a
bachelor degree in Optical Physics. Yong Hui Li is Spencer Ang
Li’s father.
Lei Chen
has served as Fincera’s Senior Vice President
since April 9, 2009. Mr. Chen has served as a Senior Vice President
in charge of the finance department and investor relations services
for ACG since September 2008. From January 1996 to September 2008,
Mr. Chen served as a Senior Vice President in charge of the finance
department and investor relations services for Hebei Kaiyuan Auto
Trading Co., Ltd., a company affiliated with Yong Hui Li. Mr. Chen
received a Bachelor of Economics degree from Hebei Finance and
Economics University, China.
Jason Chia-Lun Wang
has served as Fincera’s Chief
Financial Officer since July 2009. Mr. Wang has also served
as an independent director of Prime Acquisition Corp., a blank
check company, since its inception in February 2011 until September
2013. From December 2007 until joining Fincera, Mr. Wang served as
Director of Research and Analytics at Private Equity Management
Group Inc. where he was responsible for analysis of prospective
investments, credit and cash flow analysis, and valuations.
From July 2005 until December 2007, Mr. Wang worked at QUALCOMM
Inc., a developer and innovator of advanced wireless technologies,
products and services, where his responsibilities included all
phases of venture capital investing, from target company
identification to portfolio management. From July 2004 until July
2005, Mr. Wang was an investment banking associate at Relational
Advisors LLC, where he specialized in mergers and acquisitions and
debt and equity fundraising. From March 2000 until July 2002, Mr.
Wang was the Director of Corporate Development and Planning at 24/7
Real Media Inc., a global digital marketing company. Prior to that,
Mr. Wang was an investment banking analyst in the Global Mergers
and Acquisitions Group at Chase Securities Inc. Mr. Wang received
his MBA from the UCLA Anderson School of Management in June 2004
and bachelor degrees from both the Wharton School and the School of
Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Pennsylvania
in May 1998. Mr. Wang is a CPA licensed in Virginia.
Xing Wei
has served as Fincera’s Chief Operating
Officer since April 9, 2009. Mr. Wei has served as Chief Operating
Officer of ACG since September 2008. From July 2001 to September
2008, Mr. Wei served as Chief Operating Officer for Hebei Kaiyuan,
a company affiliated with Yong Hui Li. Mr. Wei received a Bachelor
of Engineering degree from Hebei Building Engineering University
and a Bachelor of Economics degree from Hebei
University.
James Cheng-Jee Sha
has served as a member of
Fincera’s Board of Directors since its inception. Mr. Sha
served as Chairman of Fincera’s Board of Directors and Chief
Executive Officer from its inception to April 9, 2009. Mr. Sha
founded and has been a partner of Spring Creek Investments since
December 1999. Spring Creek Investments is a private investment
firm specializing in principal investments and business
consultations with internet and infrastructure companies. Mr. Sha
also has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Optoplex
Corporation, a communication networks company, since 2001. From
September 2005 to February 2007, Mr. Sha served as Chief Executive
Officer of AppStream, a software application virtualization
company. From February 1999 to September 1999, Mr. Sha served as
the Chief Executive Officer for Sina.com (NASDAQ: SINA), a global
Chinese on-line media company and value added information service
provider. From July 1996 to August 1998, Mr. Sha served as the
Chief Executive Officer of Actra Business Systems, a joint venture
between Netscape Communications Corporation and GE Information
Services (GEIS), providing next-generation internet commerce
application solutions for both business-to-consumer and
business-to-business commerce markets. From August 1994 to August
1998, Mr. Sha served as Senior Vice President and General Manager
of Netscape Communications Corporation, a computer services company
until its merger with AOL. From May 1990 to August 1994, Mr. Sha
was a Vice President at Oracle Corporation (NASDAQ:ORCL), a
database management and development systems software company. From
June 1986 to May 1990, Mr. Sha was a Vice President at Wyse
Technology, Inc., a hardware, software and services computing
company. Mr. Sha currently serves as a member of the audit
committee and the Board of Directors of Tom.com (HK: 8282), a
wireless internet company in the PRC providing value-added
multimedia products and services. Mr. Sha also currently serves as
a director of Armorize Corp. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Sha also served
on the board of Abovenet. Mr. Sha also serves as a trustee of the
University of California at Berkeley Foundation and is a Board
member of the Berkeley Chinese Alumni International Association.
Mr. Sha graduated from National Taiwan University with a BS in
Electrical Engineering, the University of California at Berkeley
with an MS in EECS and from Santa Clara University with an
MBA.
Diana Chia-Huei Liu
has served as a member of
Fincera’s Board of Directors since its inception. Ms. Liu
served as President of Fincera from its inception to April 9, 2009.
Ms. Liu has also served as the Chief Executive Officer and a
director of Prime Acquisition Corp., a blank check company, since
its inception in February 2011. Ms. Liu has served as the President
and Managing Director of Cansbridge Capital, a private investment
firm specializing in early stage investments along the west coast
of North America (namely U.S. and Canada) and Asia, since August
1998. Prior to Cansbridge, Ms. Liu served as the Executive
Vice-President at Polaris Securities Group (TW: 6011), an
investment firm in Taiwan, where she founded and managed its North
American operations from April 1994 to August 1998. From August
1991 to April 1994, Ms. Liu was an account portfolio manager in
global private banking at the Royal Bank of Canada (NYSE:RY), a
full-service banking firm. From October 1988 to August 1991, Ms.
Liu served as the regional sales manager for the province of
British Columbia, Canada, at CIBC Securities, a subsidiary of CIBC
(NYSE:CM), a full- service banking firm, where she founded and
managed the mutual funds promotion division. Ms. Liu has served
since March 2006 as a member of the Executive Committee and the
Chair of the Investment Committee at the Asia Pacific Foundation, a
Canadian federal government created think tank and policy advisory
board where she works closely with the co-CEOs on operational
issues and investment of its endowment funds. In addition, she also
currently serves as a director of the Vancouver Goh Ballet Society
and BaySpec, Inc., a supplier of optical components. Ms. Liu
graduated with a BA in economics from the University of British
Columbia in Canada. Ms. Liu is the spouse of Mr. William Yu,
Fincera’s prior Chief Financial Officer.
Leon Ling Chen
has served as a member of Fincera’s
Board of Directors since December 29, 2011. Mr. Chen is the
Managing Director of Graham Vacuum and Heat Transfer Technology
(Suzhou) Co., Ltd., the Chinese subsidiary of Graham Corporation
(NYSE Amex: GHM), where he manages China operations, oversees
financial control and accounting activities, and leads the
expansion of sales and distribution networks within China. Mr. Chen
joined Graham Vacuum and Heat Transfer Technology (Suzhou) Co.,
Ltd. in January of 2006, and also serves as a member of the board
of directors of the company. Prior to his tenure at Graham, Mr.
Chen was President and CEO of Bayspec Inc., a vertically integrated
spectral sensing company. Mr. Chen received a BS in engineering
from Tianjin University in China, and a BA in Economics from
University of International Business & Economics in Beijing,
China.
Spencer Ang Li
has served as Fincera’s Vice President,
Product since June 24, 2015, and has served as a member of
Fincera’s Board of Directors since June 26, 2014. He oversaw
the development and launch of all of Fincera’s internet
platforms, including CeraPay, CeraVest, TruShip, AutoChekk and most
recently PingPing. Prior to joining Fincera, from July 2011 to
January 2014 Mr. Li was an Investment Banking Analyst at Cogent
Partners in New York, an advisor for private equity secondary
transactions. Mr. Li received a BS in Economics and BA in
Psychology from Duke University in 2011. Spencer Ang Li is Yong Hui
Li’s son.
The
term of each director is until the next election of directors or
their earlier resignation or removal. The terms of Yong Hui Li
as Chief Executive Officer, Lei Chen as Senior Vice President, and
Xing Wei as Chief Operating Officer are until May 9, 2018, unless
terminated or extended pursuant to such person’s employment
contract with Fincera. The term of Jason Wang as Chief Financial
Officer is until March 1, 2019, unless terminated or extended
pursuant to his employment contract with Fincera.
Pursuant
to the share exchange agreement entered into on February 4, 2009
and amended on March 11, 2009, James Cheng-Jee Sha and Diana
Chia-Huei Liu were nominated as members of Fincera’s Board of
Directors by the SCAC Shareholders’ Representative (as
defined in the share exchange agreement) and Yong Hui Li and
Spencer Ang Li were nominated as members of Fincera’s Board
of Directors by the Fincera Shareholders’ Representative (as
defined in the share exchange agreement). Leon Ling Chen was
nominated upon the mutual agreement of the SCAC Shareholders’
Representative and the Fincera Shareholders’ Representative,
pursuant to the share exchange agreement.
The
business address of each party described above is 27/F, Kai Yuan
Finance Center, No. 5, East Main Street, Shijiazhuang, Hebei,
People’s Republic of China.
B.
Compensation
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
During
the last fiscal year, no officer and employee of Fincera, and no
former officer of Fincera participated in deliberations of
Fincera’s Board of Directors concerning executive officer
compensation.
Fincera Director Compensation
The
company pays an annual cash retainer of $30,000 to Leon Chen, James
Sha and Diana Liu, its independent directors.
Fincera’s Executive Officers and Employees
Executive Officers
The
Company has entered into employment agreements with each of the
executive officers, which were renewed on May 9, 2015 until May 9,
2018 (except in the case of Mr. Wang whose employment agreement was
renewed on March 6, 2016);
●
Yong Hui Li does
not receive compensation for serving as Chief Executive Officer,
Jason Wang receives $220,000 per year as base salary for serving as
Chief Financial Officer, Xing Wei receives $62,867 per year as base
salary for serving as Chief Operating Officer, Lei Chen receives
$34,128 per year as base salary for serving as Senior Vice
President and as of July 1, 2015 Spencer Li receives $100,000 per
year as base salary for serving as Vice President, Product. No
executive officer is entitled to a bonus, unless otherwise approved
by the board of directors;
●
the employment
agreements may be terminated by the Company (i) upon termination of
the executive “for cause”, which is defined as (A) the
failure of the executive to properly carry out his duties after
notice by the Company of the failure to do so and a reasonable
opportunity for the executive to correct the same within a
reasonable period specified by the Company; (B) any breach by the
executive of one or more provisions of any written agreement with,
or written policies of, the Company or his fiduciary duties to the
Company likely to cause material harm to the Company and its
related parties, at the Company’s reasonable discretion, or
(C) any theft, fraud, dishonesty or serious misconduct by the
executive involving his duties or the property, business,
reputation or affairs of the Company and its related parties, (ii)
due to the executive’s death, (iii) in the event the
executive becomes eligible for the Company’s long-term
disability benefits or if the executive is unable to carry out his
responsibilities as a result of a physical or mental impairment for
more than 90 consecutive days or for more than 120 days in any
12-month period, subject to applicable laws, and (iv) without cause
upon one month written notice, in which case the executive will be
entitled to 3 months’ base salary severance to the extent the
executive is not otherwise employed during the severance
period;
●
the employment
agreements may be terminated by the respective executives: (i) for
any reason or no reason at all upon 3 months’ advanced
notice, or (ii) for “good reason” upon notice of the
reason within 3 months of the event causing such reason and subject
to a 20-day cure period for the Company. “Good reason”
is defined as: a material reduction in the executive’s base
salary, except for reductions that are comparable to reductions
generally applicable to similarly situated executives of Fincera if
(i) such reduction is effected by the Company without the consent
of the executive and (ii) such event occurs within 3 months after a
change in control. If the agreement is terminated by the
executive for “good reason” then the executive is
entitled to 1 month’s base salary severance to the extent the
executive is not otherwise employed during the severance
period;
●
each executive is
subject to the non-compete, non-solicitation provisions of the
agreement for a term of one year following termination of the
employment agreement;
●
except for
“prior inventions” (which is defined as all inventions,
original works of authorship, developments, improvements, and trade
secrets which were made by the executive prior to the
executive’s employment with the Company), all inventions and
other intellectual property created by the executive during the
term of employment are the property of the Company, and the
executive agrees to assist the Company to secure such intellectual
property rights; and
●
the employment
agreements include other customary terms and conditions, and are
governed by the laws of Hong Kong.
Compensation
for senior executives generally consists of four elements: a base
salary, an annual performance bonus, equity and
benefits.
In
developing salary ranges, potential bonus payouts, equity awards
and benefit plans, it is anticipated that the compensation
committee of the Board of Directors will take into account: 1)
competitive compensation among comparable companies and for similar
positions in the market, 2) relevant ways to incentivize and reward
senior management for improving shareholder value while building
Fincera into a successful company, 3) individual performance, 4)
how best to retain key executives, 5) the overall performance of
Fincera and its various key component entities, 6) Fincera’s
ability to pay and 7) other factors deemed to be relevant at the
time.
Director and Executive Officer Compensation
The
following table shows information concerning the annual
compensation for services provided to Fincera by certain employees,
including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial
Officer.
Name andPrincipal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
All other
Compensation($)
|
|
Yong Hui Li, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2016
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Xing Wei, Chief
Operating Officer
|
|
2016
|
62,867
|
—
|
|
—
|
—
|
62,867
|
Jason Wang, Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
2016
|
220,000
|
20,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
240,000
|
Lei Chen, Senior
Vice-President
|
|
2016
|
34,128
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
34,128
|
Spencer Li, VP
Product
|
|
2016
|
100,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
100,000
|
Fincera Inc. 2009 Equity Incentive Plan
The
Fincera Inc. 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, which we refer as the 2009
incentive plan, was approved and took effect on April 8, 2009 upon
the approval by the shareholders of Fincera Inc.
Under
the terms of the 2009 incentive plan, 1,675,000 Fincera ordinary
shares are reserved for issuance in accordance with its terms
(provided, however, that dividend equivalent rights are payable
solely in cash and therefore do not reduce the number of shares
that may be granted under the incentive plan and that stock
appreciation rights only reduce the number of shares available for
grant under the incentive plan by the number of shares actually
received by the grantee in connection with the stock appreciation
right, if any). All awards under the incentive plan are made by
Fincera’s Board of Directors or its Compensation
Committee.
The
purpose of the incentive plan is to assist Fincera in attracting,
retaining and providing incentives to its employees, directors and
consultants, and the employees, directors and consultants of its
related parties, whose past, present and/or potential future
contributions to Fincera have been, are or will be important to the
success of Fincera and to align the interests of such persons with
Fincera’s shareholders. It is also designed to motivate
employees and to significantly contribute toward growth and
profitability, by providing incentives to the directors, employees
and consultants of Fincera and its related parties who, by their
position, ability and diligence are able to make important
contributions to the growth and profitability of Fincera and its
related parties. The various types of incentive awards that may be
issued under the incentive plan will enable Fincera to respond to
changes in compensation practices, tax laws, accounting regulations
and the size and diversity of its business and the business of its
related parties.
All
directors, employees and consultants of Fincera and its related
parties are eligible to be granted awards under the 2009 incentive
plan. Fincera did not award equity incentives to its executive
officers during 2016 under the 2009 incentive plan.
Fincera Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan
The
Fincera Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, which we refer to
as the 2015 incentive plan, took effect on September 24, 2015 and
superseded the 2009 incentive plan. It was approved by shareholders
at the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders held on July
12, 2016.
Under
the terms of the 2015 incentive plan, 1,023,712 Fincera ordinary
shares are reserved for issuance in accordance with its terms
(provided, however, that dividend equivalent rights are payable
solely in cash and therefore do not reduce the number of shares
that may be granted under the incentive plan and that stock
appreciation rights only reduce the number of shares available for
grant under the incentive plan by the number of shares actually
received by the grantee in connection with the stock appreciation
right, if any). All awards under the incentive plan are made by
Fincera’s Board of Directors or its Compensation
Committee.
The
purpose of the incentive plan is to assist Fincera in attracting,
retaining and providing incentives to its employees, directors and
consultants, and the employees, directors and consultants of its
related parties, whose past, present and/or potential future
contributions to Fincera have been, are or will be important to the
success of Fincera and to align the interests of such persons with
Fincera’s shareholders. It is also designed to motivate
employees and to significantly contribute toward growth and
profitability, by providing incentives to the directors, employees
and consultants of Fincera and its related parties who, by their
position, ability and diligence are able to make important
contributions to the growth and profitability of Fincera and its
related parties. The various types of incentive awards that may be
issued under the incentive plan will enable Fincera to respond to
changes in compensation practices, tax laws, accounting regulations
and the size and diversity of its business and the business of its
related parties.
All
directors, employees and consultants of Fincera and its related
parties are eligible to be granted awards under the 2015 incentive
plan. Fincera did not award equity incentives to its executive
officers during 2016 under the 2015 incentive plan.
Description of the 2015 Incentive Plan
A
summary of the principal features of the 2015 incentive plan is
provided below, but is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the full text of the incentive plan, a copy of which was attached
as Exhibit 4.31 to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on May 2,
2016.
Awards
The
incentive plan provides for the grant of any type of arrangement to
an employee, director or consultant of Fincera or its related
parties, which involves or might involve the issuance of ordinary
shares, cash, stock options or stock appreciation rights, or a
similar right with a fixed or variable price related to the fair
market value of the ordinary shares and with an exercise or
conversion privilege related to the passage of time, the occurrence
of one or more events, or the satisfaction of performance criteria
or other conditions. Such awards include, without limitation,
incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock
appreciation rights, sales or bonuses of restricted shares,
restricted share units and dividend equivalent rights, or any two
or more of such awards in combination, for an aggregate of not more
than 1,023,712 of the ordinary shares, to directors, employees and
consultants of Fincera or its related parties. If any award
expires, is cancelled, or terminates unexercised or is forfeited,
the number of ordinary shares subject thereto, if any, will again
be available for grant under the incentive plan. The number of
ordinary shares with respect to which stock options or stock
appreciation rights may be granted to a grantee under the incentive
plan in any calendar year cannot exceed 100,000. The number of
restricted ordinary shares or restricted share units which may be
granted to a grantee under the incentive plan in any calendar year
cannot exceed 100,000.
As of
December 31, 2016, there are approximately 2,248 employees,
directors and consultants who are currently eligible to receive
awards under the Incentive Plan. New directors, employees and
consultants of Fincera or its related parties are eligible to
participate in the incentive plan as well.
The
below table lists the grants made under the incentive plans. The
exercise prices represent the closing prices of the Ordinary Shares
on the dates of grant. The total vesting period for each of these
stock options is four years, with 25% vesting one year after the
date of grant and the remaining 75% vesting ratably each month for
three years thereafter. Each of these stock options has a term of
10 years.
Grant Date
|
|
Type of Instrument
|
|
|
September 3,
2009
|
|
Stock
options
|
681,840
|
$
9.50
|
December 3,
2009
|
|
Stock
options
|
520,944
|
$
25.65
|
May 19,
2010
|
|
Stock
options
|
27,024
|
$
23.80
|
August 19,
2010
|
|
Stock
options
|
364,080
|
$
27.19
|
March 23,
2011
|
|
Stock
options
|
72,000
|
$
36.38
|
September 24,
2015
|
|
Stock
options
|
513,958
|
$
28.00
|
December 28,
2015
|
|
Stock
options
|
139,808
|
$
28.00
|
April 29,
2016
|
|
Stock
options
|
136,200
|
$
27.10
|
September 27,
2016
|
|
Stock
options
|
21,000
|
$
27.20
|
November 27,
2016
|
|
Stock
options
|
157,000
|
$
27.20
|
On
August 6, 2012, the Company’s board of directors determined
to amend certain Share Option Award Agreements entered into
pursuant to the incentive plan to reduce the exercise price per
share thereunder to the current fair market value of the
Company’s ordinary shares, which is $14.50 per share. The
amendment affected 984,048 shares of stock options granted during
the prior periods. The reduction in the exercise price of the stock
options increased the fair value of share-based expense by
$1,281,000 in the year ended December 31, 2012. The Company’s
amendment also increased the unrecognized compensation expenses by
$575,000 which will increase the general and administrative
expenses and additional paid-in capital throughout the remaining
vesting period of the respective stock options.
As of
December 31, 2016, 30,786 of these stock options had been
exercised, and Fincera had recorded aggregate compensation
expense of $17,964,000 based on the estimated fair value of the
stock options on their dates of grant. All of the exercised stock
options utilized a net exercise method, and therefore, the Company
did not receive any cash proceeds from their exercise. The per
share fair value of the stock options granted under the incentive
plan was initially estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model with the following assumptions:
Date of Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest
rate (2)
|
2.95
%
|
2.87
%
|
2.82
%
|
2.06
%
|
2.73
%
|
Volatility
(3)
|
47
%
|
42
%
|
43
%
|
46
%
|
60
%
|
Expected Life (in
years) (4)
|
6.08
|
6.08
|
6.08
|
6.08
|
6.08
|
Date of Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest
rate (2)
|
1.84
%
|
2.05
%
|
2.05
%
|
1.39
%
|
2.12
%
|
Volatility
(3)
|
26
%
|
25
%
|
41
%
|
32
%
|
32
%
|
Expected Life (in
years) (4)
|
6.08
|
6.08
|
6.08
|
6.08
|
6.08
|
(1)
The
Company has no expectation of paying regular cash dividends on its
common stock.
(2)
The
risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a
term consistent with the expected term of the awards in effect at
the time of grant.
(3)
The
Company estimates the volatility of its ordinary shares at the date
of grant based on its historical monthly price
observations
.
(4)
The
expected life of stock options granted under the incentive plan is
based on expected exercise patterns, which the Company believes are
representative of future behavior.
The
Company used the binomial model to estimate the fair value of the
modified options to reflect the amendment of the exercise prices of
984,048 shares of stock options previously granted in August 2012,
using the following assumptions:
Date of Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest
rate (2)
|
1.08
%
|
1.17
%
|
1.23
%
|
1.30
%
|
Volatility
(3)
|
40
%
|
40
%
|
40
%
|
40
%
|
Expected Life (in
years) (4)
|
7.30
|
7.80
|
8.00
|
8.60
|
(1)
The
Company has no expectation of paying regular cash dividends on its
common stock.
(2)
The
risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a
term consistent with the expected term of the awards in effect at
the time of grant.
(3)
The
Company estimates the volatility of its common stock at the date of
grant based on the implied volatility of publicly traded options on
the common stock of companies within the same
industry.
(4)
The
expected life of stock options granted under the incentive plan is
based on expected exercise patterns, which the Company believes are
representative of future behavior.
The
following table summarizes the outstanding options granted under
the incentive plans as at December 31, 2016, related weighted
average fair value and life information:
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
Range of
Exercise Price Per Share
|
|
|
Number
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Life (Years)
|
|
|
|
Number
Exercisable at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$9.50
to $28.00
|
|
|
2,327,692
|
|
|
$
|
6.14
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
|
|
|
1,672,003
|
|
|
$
|
13.85
|
|
Administration of the Incentive Plan
The
incentive plan is administered by either Fincera’s Board of
Directors or its compensation committee (referred to as the
committee), if the Board of Directors delegates administration of
the incentive plan. Among other things, the Board of Directors or,
if the Board of Directors delegates its authority to the committee,
the committee, has complete discretion, subject to the express
limits of the incentive plan, to determine the employees, directors
and consultants to be granted awards, the types of awards to be
granted, the terms and conditions of awards granted, the number of
Fincera ordinary shares subject to each award, if any, the exercise
price under each option, the base price of each stock appreciation
right, the term of each award, the vesting schedule and/or
performance goals for each award that utilizes such a schedule or
provides for performance goals, whether to accelerate vesting, the
value of the ordinary shares, and any required withholdings. The
Board of Directors or the committee may amend, modify or terminate
any outstanding award, provided that the grantee’s written
consent to such action is required if the action would adversely
affect the grantee. The Board of Directors or the committee is also
authorized to construe the award agreements and may prescribe rules
relating to the incentive plan. The Board of Directors or committee
may reduce the exercise price of options or reduce the base
appreciation amount of any stock appreciation right without
shareholder approval. Except as specified below, no award intended
to qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of
Section 162(m) of the Code may have a per share exercise or
purchase price, if any, of less than 100% of the fair market value
of an Fincera ordinary share on the date of grant.
Special Terms Relating to Stock Options
The
incentive plan provides for the grant of stock options, which may
be either “incentive stock options” (ISOs), which are
intended to meet the requirements for special U.S. federal income
tax treatment under the Code, or “nonqualified stock
options” (NQSOs). Stock options may be granted under the
incentive plan on such terms and conditions as the Board of
Directors or the committee, if any, may determine; however, the per
ordinary share exercise price under a stock option granted under
the incentive plan may not be less than 100% of the “fair
market value” (as defined in the incentive plan) of an
ordinary share on the date of grant of the stock option, and the
term of an ISO may not exceed ten years (110% of such value and
five years in the case of an ISO granted to an employee who owns
(or is deemed to own) more than 10% of the total combined voting
power of all classes of capital stock of Fincera or a parent or
subsidiary of Fincera). ISOs may only be granted to employees. In
addition, the aggregate fair market value of the ordinary shares
underlying one or more ISOs (determined at the time of grant of the
ISO or ISOs) which are exercisable for the first time by any one
employee during any calendar year may not exceed $100,000. The
Board of Directors or the committee, if any, may permit a cashless
“net exercise” of stock options granted under the
incentive plan. As of December 31, 2016, all the stock options
granted are ISOs.
Additional Terms
Under
the incentive plan, upon the consummation of a “corporate
transaction” (as defined in the incentive plan), all
outstanding awards under the incentive plan will terminate, except
to the extent they are assumed in connection with the corporate
transaction.
Stock
options granted under the incentive plan as ISOs may not be sold,
pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any
manner other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution
and may be exercised, during the lifetime of the grantee, only by
the grantee. Other awards are transferable (i) by will and by the
laws of descent and distribution and (ii) during the lifetime of
the grantee: (a) to a “holding company” (as defined in
the incentive plan) of such grantee, or (B) to the extent and in
the manner authorized by the Board of Directors or the committee,
if any. No ordinary shares will be delivered under the incentive
plan to any grantee or other person until such grantee or other
person has made arrangements acceptable to the Board of Directors
or the committee, if any, for the satisfaction of any national,
provincial or local income and employment tax withholding
obligations, including, without limitation, obligations incident to
the receipt of ordinary shares under the incentive
plan.
Amendments
Fincera’s
Board of Directors may at any time amend, alter, suspend or
terminate the incentive plan; provided, that no amendment requiring
shareholder approval will be effective unless such approval has
been obtained, and provided further that no amendment of the
incentive plan or its termination may be effected if it would
adversely affect the rights of a grantee without the
grantee’s consent.
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Incentive
Plan
The
following is a general summary of the U.S. federal income tax
consequences under current tax law to Fincera, were it subject to
U.S. federal income taxation on a net income basis, and to grantees
under the incentive plan who are individual citizens or residents
of the United States for U.S. federal income tax purposes
(“U.S. grantees”), of ISOs, NQSOs, sales or bonuses of
restricted shares, restricted share units, dividend equivalent
rights and SARs granted pursuant to the incentive plan. It does not
purport to cover all of the special rules that may apply, including
special rules relating to limitations on the ability of Fincera to
deduct certain compensation, special rules relating to deferred
compensation, golden parachutes, grantees subject to Section 16(b)
of the Exchange Act and the exercise of a stock option with
previously-acquired ordinary shares. This summary assumes that U.S.
grantees will hold their ordinary shares as capital assets within
the meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the “Code”). This summary does not address
the application of the passive foreign investment company rules of
the Code to U.S. grantees, which are discussed generally in the
section of this Annual Report on Form 20-F in the section captioned
“Taxation – United States Federal Income Taxation
– Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders – Passive Foreign
Investment Company Rules”. In addition, this summary does not
address the foreign, state or local income or other tax
consequences, or any U.S. federal non-income tax consequences,
inherent in the acquisition, ownership, vesting, exercise,
termination or disposition of an award under the incentive plan or
ordinary shares issued pursuant thereto. Grantees are urged to
consult their own tax advisors concerning the tax consequences to
them of an award under the incentive plan or ordinary shares issued
pursuant thereto.
A U.S.
grantee generally does not recognize taxable income upon the grant
of an NQSO or an ISO. Upon the exercise of an NQSO, the U.S.
grantee generally recognizes ordinary income in an amount equal to
the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the ordinary shares
acquired on the date of exercise over the exercise price
thereunder, and Fincera would generally be entitled to a deduction
for such amount at that time. If the U.S. grantee later sells
ordinary shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an NQSO, the
grantee generally recognizes a long-term or a short term capital
gain or loss, depending on the period for which the ordinary shares
were held thereby. A long-term capital gain is generally subject to
more favorable tax treatment than ordinary income or a short-term
capital gain. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to
certain limitations.
Upon
the exercise of an ISO, the U.S. grantee generally does not
recognize taxable income. If the U.S. grantee disposes of the
ordinary shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an ISO more
than two years after the date of grant and more than one year after
the transfer of the ordinary shares to the grantee, the grantee
generally recognizes a long-term capital gain or loss, and Fincera
would not be entitled to a deduction. However, if the grantee
disposes of such ordinary shares prior to the end of the required
holding period, all or a portion of the gain is treated as ordinary
income, and Fincera would generally be entitled to deduct such
amount.
In
addition to the U.S. federal income tax consequences described
above, the U.S. grantee may be subject to the alternative minimum
tax (“AMT”), which is payable to the extent it exceeds
the grantee’s regular income tax. For this purpose, upon the
exercise of an ISO, the excess of the fair market value of the
ordinary shares for which the ISO is exercised over the exercise
price thereunder for such ordinary shares is a preference item for
purposes of the AMT. In addition, the U.S. grantee’s basis in
such ordinary shares is increased by such excess for purposes of
computing the gain or loss on the disposition of the ordinary
shares for AMT purposes. If a U.S. grantee is required to pay any
AMT, the amount of such tax which is attributable to deferral
preferences (including any ISO adjustment) generally may be allowed
as a credit against the grantee’s regular income tax
liability (and, in certain cases, may be refunded to the grantee)
in subsequent years. To the extent the credit is not used, it may
be carried forward.
A U.S.
grantee who receives a bonus of restricted ordinary shares or who
purchases restricted ordinary shares, which, in either case, are
subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and certain transfer
restrictions, generally recognizes ordinary compensation income at
the time the restrictions lapse in an amount equal to the excess,
if any, of the fair market value of the ordinary shares at such
time over any amount paid by the grantee for the ordinary shares.
Alternatively, the U.S. grantee may elect to be taxed upon receipt
of the restricted ordinary shares based on the value of the
ordinary shares at the time of receipt. Fincera would generally be
entitled to deduct such amount at the same time as ordinary
compensation income is required to be included by the U.S. grantee
and in the same amount. Dividends received with respect to such
restricted ordinary shares are generally treated as compensation,
unless the grantee elects to be taxed on the receipt (rather than
the vesting) of the restricted ordinary shares.
A U.S.
grantee generally does not recognize income upon the grant of an
SAR. The U.S. grantee recognizes ordinary compensation income upon
the exercise of the SAR equal to the increase in the value of the
underlying shares, and Fincera would generally be entitled to a
deduction for such amount.
A U.S.
grantee generally does not recognize income in connection with a
dividend equivalent right or restricted share unit until payments
are received thereunder. At such time, the U.S. grantee recognizes
ordinary compensation income equal to the amount of any cash
payments and the fair market value of any ordinary shares received,
and Fincera would generally be entitled to deduct such amount at
such time.
Retirement Benefits
As of
December 31, 2016, Fincera’s subsidiaries in the PRC have
participated the government-mandated employee welfare and
retirement benefit contribution and provided pension, retirement or
similar benefits to its employees. The PRC regulations require our
PRC subsidiaries to pay the local labor administration bureau a
monthly contribution at a stated contribution rate based on the
monthly basic compensation of qualified employees. The local labor
administration bureau, which manages various investment funds, will
take care of employee retirement, medical and other fringe
benefits. Our subsidiaries have no further commitments beyond
this monthly contribution.
Fincera’s
(excluding its subsidiaries) only employees are its executive
officers for which it has entered into employment contracts with.
Fincera does not accrue pension, retirement or similar benefits,
except for a nominal amount of employer matching that may occur for
U.S. based employees’ 401k plans.
C.
Board Practices
Board Committees
Fincera’s
Board of Directors has an audit committee, governance and
nominating committee, and compensation committee, and has adopted a
charter for each committee. Each committee consists of Leon Chen,
James Sha and Diana Liu, each of whom is an independent director.
James Sha has been designated an “Audit Committee Financial
Expert” under SEC rules and the current listing standards of
the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. Our corporate governance practices
are designed to be the same as those followed by U.S. domestic
companies under the listing standards of NASDAQ.
Audit Committee
The
audit committee, consisting of Messrs. Sha and Chen and Ms. Liu,
oversees our financial reporting process on behalf of the board of
directors. The committee’s responsibilities include the
following functions:
●
appoint and
replace the independent auditors to conduct the annual audit of our
books and records;
●
review the
proposed scope and results of the audit;
●
review and
pre-approve the independent auditors ’ audit and non-audited
services rendered;
●
approve the audit
fees to be paid;
●
review accounting
and financial controls with the independent auditors and our
internal auditors and financial and accounting staff;
●
review and approve
related party transactions;
●
meeting separately
and periodically with management and our internal auditor and
independent auditors.
Our
board of directors has determined that Mr. Sha, the Chair of the
Audit Committee, is an “audit committee financial
expert” as defined by the SEC’s rules and the current
listing standards of the NASDAQ Market Place Rules.
Governance and Nominating Committee
The
governance and nominating committee, consisting of Messrs. Sha and
Chen and Ms. Liu, is responsible for identifying potential
candidates to serve on our board and its committees. The
committee’s responsibilities include the following
functions:
●
developing the
criteria and qualifications for membership on the
board;
●
recruiting,
reviewing and nominating candidates for election to the board or to
fill vacancies on the Board;
●
reviewing
candidates for election to the board proposed by shareholders, and
conducting appropriate inquiries into the background and
qualifications of any such candidates;
●
establishing
subcommittees for the purpose of evaluating special or unique
matters;
●
monitoring and
making recommendations regarding board committee functions,
contributions and composition; and
●
evaluating, on an
annual basis, the governance and nominating committee’s
performance.
The
governance and nominating committee will consider director
candidates recommended by shareholders. Shareholders who wish to
recommend to the governance and nominating committee a candidate
for election to the board should send their letters to Fincera
Inc., 27/F, Kai Yuan Finance Center, No. 5, East Main Street,
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050011, People’s Republic of China,
Attention: Governance and Nominating Committee. The corporate
secretary will promptly forward all such letters to the members of
the governance and nominating committee. Shareholders must follow
certain procedures to recommend to the governance and nominating
committee candidates for election as directors. In general, in
order to provide sufficient time to enable the governance and
nominating committee to evaluate candidates recommended by
shareholders in connection with selecting candidates for nomination
in connection with Fincera’s annual meeting of shareholders,
the corporate secretary must receive the shareholder’s
recommendation no later than thirty (30) days after the end of
Fincera’s fiscal year. For a list of information required to
be submitted with a recommendation, please contact Fincera’s
secretary at the address listed above.
Compensation Committee
The
compensation committee, consisting of Messrs. Sha and Chen and Ms.
Liu, is responsible for making recommendations to the board
concerning salaries and incentive compensation for our officers and
employees and administers our stock option plans. Its
responsibilities include the following functions:
●
review
Fincera’s corporate goals and objectives relevant to the
executives ’ compensation at least annually; evaluate the
executives’ performance in light of such goals and
objectives; and, either as a compensation committee or, together
with the other independent directors (as directed by the board),
determine and approve the executives’ compensation level
based on this evaluation. In determining the long-term incentive
component of the executives’ compensation, the compensation
committee will consider Fincera’s performance, the value of
similar incentive awards to the executives at comparable companies,
the awards given to the executives in past years and any relevant
legal requirements and associated guidance of the applicable
law;
●
at least annually
review and make recommendations to the board with respect to
non-executive officer and independent director compensation to
assist the board in making the final determination as to
non-executive officer and independent director
compensation;
●
attempt to ensure
that Fincera’s compensation program is effective in
attracting and retaining key employees, reinforce business
strategies and objectives for enhanced shareholder value, and
administer the compensation program in a fair and equitable manner
consistent with established policies and guidelines;
●
administer
Fincera’s incentive-compensation plans and equity-based
plans, insofar as provided therein;
●
make
recommendations to the board regarding approval, disapproval,
modification, or termination of existing or proposed employee
benefit plans;
●
approve any stock
option award or any other type of award as may be required for
complying with any tax, securities, or other regulatory
requirement, or otherwise determined to be appropriate or desirable
by the compensation committee or board;
●
approve the policy
for authorizing claims for expenses from the
executives;
●
review and assess
the adequacy of this charter annually; and
●
review and approve
the compensation disclosure and analysis prepared by
Fincera’s management, as required to be included in
Fincera’s annual report on Form 20-F, or equivalent, filed
with the SEC.
Director Independence
Fincera’s
Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Sha and Chen and Ms.
Liu qualify as independent directors under the rules of the NASDAQ
Stock Market because they do not currently own a large percentage
of Fincera’s capital stock, are not currently employed by
Fincera, have not been actively involved in the management of
Fincera and do not fall into any of the enumerated categories of
people who cannot be considered independent in the NASDAQ Stock
Market Rules.
D.
Employees
On
December 31, 2016, our subsidiaries had 2,248
employees.
Fincera
has no contracts or collective bargaining agreements with labor
unions and has never experienced work stoppages. Fincera considers
its relations with its employees to be good.
E.
Share Ownership
See
Item 7 below.
ITEM 7.
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
A.
Major Shareholders
The
following table sets forth, as of March 8, 2017, certain
information regarding beneficial ownership of Fincera’s
ordinary shares by each person who is known by Fincera to
beneficially own more than 5% of Fincera’s ordinary shares.
The table also identifies the stock ownership of each of
Fincera’s directors, each of Fincera’s named executive
officers, and all directors and officers as a group. Except as
otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed in the table have sole
voting and investment powers with respect to the shares indicated.
Fincera’s major shareholders do not have different voting
rights than any other holder of Fincera’s ordinary
shares.
Ordinary
shares which an individual or group has a right to acquire within
60 days pursuant to the exercise or conversion of options, warrants
or other similar convertible or derivative securities are deemed to
be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership of such individual or group, but are not deemed to be
outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership
of any other person shown in the table.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)
|
Amount andNature of
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
Approximate
Percentage of Outstanding Ordinary
Shares (2)
|
Honest Best
Int’l Ltd. (3)
|
19,189,446
|
|
81.44
%
|
Yong Hui
Li
|
19, 189,446
|
(4
)
|
81.44
%
|
James Cheng-Jee
Sha
|
1,295,157
|
(5
)
|
5.50
%
|
Diana Chia-Huei
Liu
|
251,161
|
(6
)
|
1.07
%
|
Xing
Wei
|
332,642
|
(7
)
|
1.40
%
|
Leon Ling
Chen
|
2,800
|
|
*
|
Lei
Chen
|
168,054
|
(8
)
|
*
|
Jason
Wang
|
131,100
|
(9
)
|
*
|
Spencer Ang
Li
|
68,189
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and
executive officers as a group (eight individuals)
|
21,438,549
|
(10
)
|
89.41
%
|
* Less
than 1%
(1)
Unless
indicated otherwise, the business address of each of the
individuals is 27/F, Kai Yuan Finance Center, No. 5, East Main
Street, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, People’s Republic of
China.
(2)
Based
on 23,563,786 ordinary shares of Fincera issued and outstanding as
of March 8, 2017, except that ordinary shares which an individual
or group has a right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to the
exercise or conversion of options, warrants or other similar
convertible or derivative securities are deemed to be outstanding
for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such
individual or group, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the
purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person
shown in the table.
(3)
Yong
Hui Li is the sole shareholder of Honest Best Int’l Ltd. and
has sole voting and dispositive power over such
shares.
(4)
Consists of
19,189,446 shares of Fincera owned by Honest Best Int’l Ltd.,
whose sole shareholder is Mr. Yong Hui Li.
(5)
Consists of
995,157 shares owned by Sha Living Trust. Mr. Sha is a trustee of
Sha Living Trust, and 300,000 ordinary shares owned by Irrevocable
Trust of James CJ Sha and Wen-Hsing Sha. Mr. Sha’s spouse is
a trustee of this trust.
(6)
Includes 9,798
ordinary shares of Fincera owned by William Tsu-Cheng Yu, Ms.
Liu’s husband.
(7)
Includes 230,400
shares underlying fully vested and exercisable incentive stock
options.
(8)
Consists of 23,944
ordinary shares and 115,200 shares underlying fully vested and
exercisable incentive stock options owned by Lei Chen, and 28,910
ordinary shares of Fincera owned by Lei Chen’s
spouse.
(9)
Includes 115,200
shares underlying fully vested and exercisable incentive stock
options.
(10)
Includes 460,800
shares underlying fully vested and exercisable incentive stock
options.
For a
description of the Fincera Inc. 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and the
Fincera Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, please refer to
Item 6B.
As of
March 31, 2017 approximately 5.5% of the ordinary shares were
held by residents of the United States and there were 2
shareholders of record in the United States, though we believe that
the number of beneficial holders in the United States may be
significantly greater.
B.
Related Party Transactions
See
Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provided herewith,
which is hereby incorporated by reference.
C.
Interests of experts and counsel.
Not
required.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A.
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial
Information.
Please
see “Item 18. Financial Statements” for a list of the
financial statements filed as part of this annual
report.
B.
Significant Changes
None.
ITEM 9.
THE OFFER AND LISTING
A.
Offer and Listing Details
Fincera’s
ordinary shares have been quoted on the over the counter market
under the symbol AUTCF since February 28, 2012. Our ordinary shares
are currently quoted on the OTC QB market.
Prior
to February 28, 2012, the ordinary shares had been quoted on the
OTC Pink Market since October 4, 2011 under the symbol AUTC. Prior
to October 4, 2011, the ordinary shares had been listed on the
NASDAQ Stock Market since October 5, 2009 under the symbol AUTC.
Prior to October 5, 2009, the ordinary shares had been quoted on
the OTC QB since March 28, 2008. Fincera’s ordinary shares
did not trade on any market or exchange prior to March 28,
2008.
The
table below reflects the high and low bid prices for
Fincera’s ordinary shares on the OTC QB Pink Sheets for the
period from January 1, 2012 through February 28, 2012 and the high
and low bid prices for Fincera’s ordinary shares on the over
the counter market (we are currently on the OTC QB) for the period
from February 28, 2012 through March 31, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
Highs and Lows
|
|
|
2012
|
$
28.50
|
$
11.50
|
2013
|
21.00
|
5.10
|
2014
|
20.00
|
8.00
|
2015
|
28.00
|
15.50
|
2016
|
31.00
|
18.00
|
|
|
|
Quarterly
Highs and Lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
$
28.00
|
$
15.50
|
Second
Quarter
|
24.00
|
18.25
|
Third
Quarter
|
28.00
|
20.00
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
28.00
|
21.25
|
2016
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
$
29.00
|
$
18.00
|
Second
Quarter
|
28.50
|
22.40
|
Third
Quarter
|
31.00
|
25.20
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
30.00
|
26.80
|
2017
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
$
34.00
|
$
29.50
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Highs and Lows
|
|
|
October
2016
|
$
27.50
|
$
26.80
|
November
2016
|
27.20
|
26.80
|
December
2016
|
30.00
|
27.20
|
January
2017
|
32.00
|
29.50
|
February
2017
|
33.65
|
32.00
|
March
2017
|
$
34.00
|
$
33.20
|
Number of Holders
. As of March 8, 2017, there were 8
holders of record of our outstanding ordinary shares, though we
believe that the number of beneficial holders is significantly
greater.
Dividends
. On January 27, 2012, the Board of Directors
declared a one-time special cash dividend in the amount of $0.25
per share. The total amount of cash distributed in the dividend was
$5,885,000 and paid on February 15, 2012, to all ordinary
shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 8,
2012.
We do
not anticipate paying any other dividend in the foreseeable future.
Any dividends paid will be solely at the discretion of our Board of
Directors.
B.
Plan of Distribution
Not
required.
C.
Markets
Fincera’s
ordinary shares have been quoted on the over the counter market
(currently on the OTC QB) under the symbol AUTCF since February 28,
2012. Our ordinary shares were quoted the OTC Pink Market under the
symbol AUTC from October 4, 2011 to February 28, 2012, and prior to
that our ordinary shares were listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market
under the symbol AUTC.
In June
2015, we changed our name from AutoChina International Ltd. to
Fincera Inc. to better suit our new internet-based business.
However, FINRA did not allow our name change to be processed for
trading purposes. Therefore, our shares are still quoted under the
symbol AUTCF.
D.
Selling Shareholders
Not
required.
E.
Dilution
Not
required.
F.
Expenses of the Issue
Not
required.
ITEM 10.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A.
Share Capital
Not
required.
B.
Memorandum and Articles of Association
We
incorporate by reference into this Annual Report the description of
our second amended and restated memorandum and articles of
association contained in the Company’s registration statement
on Form F-1/A, Registration No. 333-159607, filed on November 23,
2009.
To the
Company’s knowledge there are no limitations on the rights of
non-resident or foreign shareholders to hold our securities or
exercise voting rights.
C.
Material Contracts
Other
than in the ordinary course of business and other than those
described under this item, in “Item 4. Information on the
Company — A. History and Development of the Company” or
elsewhere in this annual report, we have not entered into any
material contract during the two years immediately preceding the
date of this annual report.
D.
Exchange Controls and Other Limitations Affecting Security
Holders
Under
Cayman Islands law, there are no exchange control restrictions in
the Cayman Islands.
E.
Taxation
The following summary of the material Cayman Islands, PRC and U.S.
federal income tax consequences of an investment in our ordinary
shares, sometimes referred to as our “securities,” is
based upon laws and relevant interpretations thereof in effect as
of the date of this Annual Report, all of which are subject to
change. This summary does not deal with all possible tax
consequences relating to an investment in our ordinary shares, such
as the tax consequences under state, local and other tax laws. As
used in this discussion, references to “we,”
“our,” or “us” refer only to Fincera Inc.,
and references to “ACG” refer only to AutoChina Group
Inc.
Cayman Islands Taxation
The
Government of the Cayman Islands will not, under existing
legislation, impose any income, corporate or capital gains tax,
estate duty, inheritance tax, gift tax or withholding tax upon us
or our security holders. The Cayman Islands are not party to any
double taxation treaties.
No
Cayman Islands stamp duty will be payable by our security holders
in respect of the issue or transfer of our securities. However, an
instrument transferring title to a security, if brought into or
executed in the Cayman Islands, would be subject to a nominal stamp
duty.
PRC Taxation
The
following is a summary of the material PRC tax consequences
relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our
securities.
Our
security holders should consult with their own tax advisers
regarding the PRC tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership
and disposition of our securities in their particular
circumstances.
Resident Enterprise Tax Treatment
On
March 16, 2007, the Fifth Session of the Tenth National
People’s Congress passed the Enterprise Income Tax Law of the
PRC (“EIT Law”), which became effective on January 1,
2008. Under the EIT Law, enterprises are classified as
“resident enterprises” and “non-resident
enterprises.” Pursuant to the EIT Law and its implementing
rules, enterprises established outside China whose “de facto
management bodies” are located in China are considered
“resident enterprises” and subject to the uniform 25%
enterprise income tax rate on worldwide income. According to the
implementing rules of the EIT Law, “de facto management
body” refers to a managing body that in practice exercises
overall management control over the production and business,
personnel, accounting and assets of an enterprise.
On
April 22, 2009, the State Administration of Taxation ("SAT") issued
the Notice on the Issues Regarding Recognition of Enterprises that
are Domestically Controlled as PRC Resident Enterprises Based on
the De Facto Management Body Criteria ("Circular Guo Shui Fa [2009]
No. 82"), which was retroactively effective as of January 1, 2008.
This notice provides that an overseas incorporated enterprise that
is controlled domestically will be recognized as a
“tax-resident enterprise” if it satisfies all of the
following conditions: (i) the senior management responsible for
daily production/business operations are primarily located in the
PRC, and the location(s) where such senior management execute their
responsibilities are primarily in the PRC; (ii) strategic financial
and personnel decisions are made or approved by organizations or
personnel located in the PRC; (iii) major properties, accounting
ledgers, company seals and minutes of board meetings and
stockholder meetings, etc., are maintained in the PRC; and (iv) 50%
or more of the board members with voting rights or senior
management habitually reside in the PRC.
Following
Circular Guo Shui Fa [2009] No. 82, on July 27, 2011, the SAT
issued the Announcement of Administrative Measures for Income Tax
on Overseas Incorporated Enterprise that is Controlled Domestically
(Trial Implementation), which specified that the determination of
the PRC tax resident status for overseas incorporated enterprises
can be made either by (i) applying for determination by tax
authorities after a self-assessment by the enterprises or (ii)
determination by tax authorities upon investigation and discovery
by the tax authorities. In the latter case, if the PRC tax
authorities determine that we, ACG, Fancy Think Limited or Eastern
Eagle is a “resident enterprise” for PRC EIT purposes,
a number of tax consequences could follow. First, we, ACG, Fancy
Think Limited and/or Eastern Eagle could be subject to the EIT at a
rate of 25% on our, ACG’s, Fancy Think Limited’s and/or
Eastern Eagle’s worldwide taxable income, as well as PRC
enterprise income tax reporting obligations. Second, the EIT Law
provides that dividend income between “qualified resident
enterprises” is exempt from income tax. As a result, if we,
ACG, Fancy Think Limited and Eastern Eagle are treated as PRC
“resident enterprises,” all dividends paid from
Ganglian or Chuanglian to us (through Fancy Think Limited and ACG)
or from Hebei Anyong Trading to us (through Eastern Eagle and ACG)
would constitute dividend income between “qualified resident
enterprises” and would therefore qualify for tax
exemption.
As of
the date this document is filed, there has not been a definitive
determination as to the “resident enterprise” or
“non-resident enterprise” status of us, ACG, Fancy
Think Limited and/or Eastern Eagle. However, since it is not
anticipated that we, ACG, Fancy Think Limited and/or Eastern Eagle
would receive dividends or generate other income in the near
future, we, ACG, Fancy Think Limited and Eastern Eagle are not
expected to have any income that would be subject to the 25%
enterprise income tax on worldwide income in the near future. We,
ACG, Fancy Think Limited and Eastern Eagle will consult with the
PRC tax authorities and make any necessary tax payment if we, ACG,
Fancy Think Limited and/or Eastern Eagle (based on future
clarifying guidance issued by the PRC), or the PRC tax authorities,
determine that we, ACG, Fancy Think Limited or Eastern Eagle are a
resident enterprise under the EIT Law, and if we, ACG, Fancy Think
Limited or Eastern Eagle were to have income in the
future.
Dividends from Chuanglian, Ganglian and Hebei Anyong
Trading
The EIT
Law and the implementing rules of the EIT Law provide that (A) EIT
at a standard tax rate of 25% will normally be applicable to
investors that are “non-resident enterprises” which (i)
have establishments or premises of business inside the PRC, and
(ii) the income in connection with their establishment or premises
of business is sourced from the PRC or the income is earned outside
the PRC but has effective connection with their establishments or
places of business inside the PRC, and (B) PRC withholding tax at a
standard tax rate of 10% will normally be applicable to dividends
payable to investors that are “non-resident
enterprises” which (i) do not have an establishment or place
of business in the PRC or (ii) have an establishment or place of
business in the PRC, but the relevant income is not effectively
connected with the establishment or place of business, to the
extent such dividends are derived from sources within the PRC. If
Fancy Think Limited and Eastern Eagle are not treated as a resident
enterprise under the EIT Law, then dividends that Fancy Think
Limited receives from Chuanglian and Ganglian and dividends that
Eastern Eagle receives from Hebei Anyong Trading may be subject to
PRC withholding tax at the tax rate of 10% (unless a lower
withholding tax rate applies under the Tax Treaty or Tax
Arrangement, as mentioned below).
As
described above, the PRC tax authorities may determine the resident
enterprise status of entities organized under the laws of foreign
jurisdictions on a case-by-case basis. We, ACG, Fancy Think Limited
and Eastern Eagle are holding companies and substantially all of
our, ACG’s, Fancy Think Limited’s and Eastern
Eagle’s income may be derived from dividends. Thus, if we,
ACG, Fancy Think Limited and/or Eastern Eagle is considered as a
“non-resident enterprise” under the EIT Law and the
dividends paid to us, ACG, Fancy Think Limited and/or Eastern Eagle
are considered PRC-sourced income, such dividends received may be
subject to PRC withholding tax at the tax rate of 10% as described
in the foregoing paragraph.
Tax
treaty (or Tax Arrangement) between the PRC and the jurisdiction in
which a non-PRC investor resides may reduce withholding tax rate on
such dividend income, with respect to such non-PRC enterprise
investor if certain conditions under tax treaty and domestic tax
laws are fulfilled. For example, pursuant to the PRC-Hong Kong Tax
Arrangement and PRC domestic tax laws, if the Hong Kong enterprise
is the beneficial owner of such dividend income and is allowed to
enjoy the treaty benefits regarding favorable withholding tax rate
by PRC tax authority (basically, Hong Kong enterprise shall own
more than 25% of the equity interest in a company in China and
shall not be deemed to be a conduit by the PRC tax authorities),
the 10% PRC withholding tax on the dividends the Hong Kong
enterprise receives from such company in China can be reduced to
5%. We and ACG are Cayman Islands holding companies, and ACG has
subsidiaries in Hong Kong (Fancy Think Limited and Heat Planet),
which in turn owns a 100% equity interest in Chuanglian and
Ganglian, while Eastern Eagle (Hong Kong) has a 100% equity
interest in Hebei Anyong Trading.
As a
result, if Fancy Think Limited and Eastern Eagle were treated as a
PRC “non-resident enterprise” under the EIT Law, then
dividends that Fancy Think Limited receives from Chuanglian and
Ganglian or dividends that Eastern Eagle receives from Hebei Anyong
Trading (assuming such dividends were considered sourced within the
PRC) (i) may be subject to a lower 5% PRC withholding tax, if the
PRC-Hong Kong Tax Arrangement were applicable, or (ii) if such Tax
Arrangement does not apply (i.e., because the PRC tax authorities
may deem Fancy Think Limited and/or Eastern Eagle to be a conduit
not entitled to treaty benefits), may be subject to a 10% PRC
withholding tax. Similarly, if we or ACG were treated as a PRC
“non-resident enterprise” under the EIT Law, and Fancy
Think Limited and /or Eastern Eagle were treated as a PRC
“resident enterprise” under the EIT Law, then dividends
that we or ACG receive from Fancy Think Limited and/or Eastern
Eagle (assuming such dividends were considered sourced within the
PRC) may be subject to a 10% PRC withholding tax. Any such taxes on
dividends could materially reduce the net amount of dividends, if
any, we could pay to our shareholders.
As of
the date this document is filed, there has not been a definitive
determination as to the “resident enterprise” or
“non-resident enterprise” status of us, ACG, Fancy
Think Limited or Eastern Eagle. As indicated above, however,
Chuanglian, Ganglian and Hebei Anyong Trading are not expected to
pay any dividends in the near future. We, ACG, Fancy Think Limited
and Eastern Eagle will consult with the PRC tax authorities and
make any necessary tax withholding if, in the future, Chuanglian,
Ganglian and Hebei Anyong Trading were to pay any dividends and we,
ACG, Fancy Think Limited or Eastern Eagle (based on future
clarifying guidance issued by the PRC), or the PRC tax authorities,
determine that either we, ACG, Fancy Think Limited or Eastern Eagle
is a non-resident enterprise under the EIT Law.
Dividends that Non-PRC Resident Investors Receive From Us; Gain on
the Sale or Transfer of Our Securities
If
dividends payable to or gains recognized by our non-resident
enterprise investors are treated as PRC-sourced income, then the
dividends that non-resident enterprise investors receive from us
and any such gain on the sale or transfer of our securities may be
subject to PRC income tax under the PRC tax laws.
Under
the EIT Law and the implementing rules of the EIT Law, PRC
withholding tax at the standard rate of 10% is applicable to
dividends payable to investors that are “non-resident
enterprises,” which (i) do not have an establishment or place
of business in the PRC or (ii) have an establishment or place of
business in the PRC but the relevant income is not effectively
connected with the establishment or place of business, to the
extent that such dividends have their sources within the PRC.
Similarly, any gain realized on the transfer of our securities by
such enterprise investors is also subject to 10% PRC income tax if
such gain is regarded as PRC-sourced income.
The
dividends paid by us to non-resident enterprise investors with
respect to our ordinary shares, or gain non-resident enterprise
investors may realize from the sale or transfer of our securities,
may be treated as PRC-sourced income and, as a result, may be
subject to PRC withholding tax at a rate of 10%. In such event, we
may be required to withhold a 10% PRC tax on any dividends paid to
non-resident enterprise investors. In addition, non-resident
enterprise investors in our securities may be responsible for
paying PRC withholding tax at a rate of 10% on any gain realized
from the sale or transfer of our securities if such non-resident
enterprise investors and the gain satisfy the requirements under
the EIT Law and its implementing rules. However, under the EIT Law
and its implementing rules, we would not have an obligation to
withhold PRC income tax in respect of the gains that non-resident
enterprise investors (including U.S. investors) may realize from
the sale or transfer of our securities.
If we
were to pay any dividends in the future, we would consult with the
PRC tax authorities and if we (based on future clarifying guidance
issued by the PRC), or the PRC tax authorities, determine that we
must withhold PRC tax on any dividends payable by us under the EIT
Law, we will make any necessary withholding tax on dividends
payable to our non-resident enterprise investors. If non-resident
enterprise investors as described under the EIT Law (including U.S.
investors) realized any gain from the sale or transfer of our
securities and if such gain were considered as PRC-sourced income,
such non-resident enterprise investors would be responsible for
paying 10% PRC withholding tax on the gain from the sale or
transfer of our securities. As indicated above, under the EIT Law
and its implementing rules, we would not have an obligation to
withhold PRC income tax in respect of the gains that non-resident
enterprise investors (including U.S. investors) may realize from
the sale or transfer of our securities.
Moreover,
the SAT introduced Circular Guoshuihan No. 698 (“Circular
698”) on December 15, 2009, according to which a non-resident
enterprise transferring shares in a Foreign Enterprise (i.e. an
offshore enterprise that directly or indirectly holds an equity
interest in a PRC enterprise) are subject to PRC income tax on the
gains from the transfer if the PRC tax authorities determine that
the arrangement lacks a reasonable commercial purpose. The PRC tax
authorities will re-characterize the indirect transfer as a direct
transfer of the PRC enterprise, and therefore subject to PRC income
taxes.
To
date, the SAT has been monitoring all kinds of offshore indirect
transfer, and on February 3, 2015, the SAT released the
Announcement on Several Issues Concerning the Enterprise Income Tax
on the Indirect Transfers of Properties by Non-resident
Enterprises, as a Public Announcement ("Circular 7") to supersede
most of the rules under Circular 698. Circular 7 introduces a new
tax regime that is significantly different from that under Circular
698. Firstly, it expands the transactions covered under Circular
698 (i.e. offshore indirect equity transactions) into covering
transactions involving the transfer of "China Taxable Properties",
which includes (i) assets attributed to an establishment in China,
(ii) immovable property in China, and (iii) shares in Chinese
resident enterprises. Second, Circular 7 provides clearer criteria
than Circular 698 on how to assess the reasonable commercial
purposes and introduces "safe harbor" and "blacklisted" scenarios.
Third, Circular 7 encourages the transaction parties of an indirect
transfer that are neither within the Safe Harbor Scenario nor the
Blacklisted Scenario to voluntarily file a report to the in-charge
China tax authority for assessment of reasonable business purpose.
If the parties of the indirect transfer fail to file such a report,
but the indirect transfer is identified as short of reasonable
business purpose, the China tax authority will be entitled to
collect the EIT on the capital gain and also impose a heavy penalty
and a late payment interest. Circular 7 brings challenges to both
the foreign transferor and the transferee of the offshore indirect
transfer as they have to make a self-assessment on whether the
transaction should be subject to PRC taxes and to file or withhold
the PRC taxes accordingly. Thus, it is advisable for the
transaction parties to consult their PRC tax advisor regarding the
PRC tax implications.
Penalties for Failure to Pay Applicable PRC Income Tax
Non-resident
investors in us may be subject to the PRC income tax at a rate of
10% on any gain realized from the sale or transfer of our
securities if such non-resident investors and the gain trigger the
tax rules under the EIT Law and its implementing rules, as
described above.
According
to the EIT Law and its implementing rules, the PRC Tax
Administration and Tax Collection Law and its implementing rules,
tax criminal provisions under PRC Criminal Law, the Provisional
Measures for the Administration of Withholding of Enterprise Income
Tax for Non-resident Enterprises and other applicable PRC laws or
regulations (collectively the “Tax Related Laws”),
where any gain derived by non-resident investors from the sale or
transfer of our securities is subject to any income tax in the PRC,
and such non-resident investors fail to file any tax return or pay
tax in this regard pursuant to the Tax Related Laws, they may be
subject to certain fines, penalties or punishments, including
without limitation: (1) if a non-resident investor fails to file a
tax return and present the relevant information in connection with
tax payments, the competent tax authorities shall order it to do so
within the prescribed time limit and may impose a fine up to RMB
2,000, and in serious cases, may impose a fine ranging from RMB
2,000 to RMB 10,000; (2) if a non-resident investor fails to file a
tax return or fails to pay all or part of the amount of tax
payable, the non-resident investor shall be required to pay the
unpaid tax amount, late payment interests on unpaid tax amount (the
daily interest rate is 0.05% of the unpaid tax amount, starting
from the first day when the tax payment liability arose), and a
fine ranging from 50% to 500% of the unpaid tax amount; (3) if a
non-resident investor fails to file a tax return or pay the tax
within the prescribed time limit according to the order by the PRC
tax authorities, the PRC tax authorities may collect and check
information about the income items of the non-resident investor in
the PRC and other payers (the “Other Payers”) who will
pay amounts to such non-resident investor, and send a “Notice
of Tax Issues” to the Other Payers to collect the unpaid tax
amount and impose late payment interests and fines on such
non-resident investor from the amounts otherwise payable to such
non-resident investor by the Other Payers; (4) if a non-resident
investor fails to pay the tax payable within the prescribed time
limit as ordered by the PRC tax authorities, a fine may be imposed
on the non-resident investor ranging from 50% to 500% of the unpaid
tax amount; and the PRC tax authorities may, upon approval by the
director of the tax bureau (or sub-bureau) of, or higher than, the
county level, take the following compulsory measures: (i) notify in
writing the non-resident investor’s bank or other financial
institution to withhold from the account thereof for payment of the
amount of tax payable, and (ii) detain, seal off, or sell by
auction or on the market the non-resident investor’s
commodities, goods or other property in a value equivalent to the
amount of tax payable; or (5) if the nonresident investor fails to
pay all or part of the amount of tax payable late payment interests
for outstanding tax payment, and cannot provide a guarantee to the
tax authorities, the tax authorities may notify the entry-exit
authorities to prevent the non-resident investor or its legal
representative from leaving the territory of the PRC. In an extreme
case, taxpayer might be subject to PRC tax criminal liability (for
example, fixed-term imprisonment if tax evasion crime is
constituted to deliberately evade PRC taxes by means stipulated
under PRC Criminal Law).
United States Federal Income Taxation
General
The
following is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our
ordinary shares. The discussion below of the U.S. federal
income tax consequences to “U.S. Holders” will apply to
a beneficial owner of our ordinary shares that is for U.S. federal
income tax purposes:
●
an individual
citizen or resident of the United States;
●
a corporation (or
other entity treated as a corporation) that is created or organized
(or treated as created or organized) in or under the laws of the
United States, any state thereof or the District of
Columbia;
●
an estate whose
income is includible in gross income for U.S. federal income tax
purposes regardless of its source; or
●
a trust if (i) a
U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over the trust’s
administration and one or more U.S. persons are authorized to
control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (ii) it has a
valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations
to be treated as a U.S. person.
If a
beneficial owner of our ordinary shares is not described as a U.S.
Holder and is not an entity treated as a partnership or other
pass-through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes, such
owner will be considered a “Non-U.S. Holder.” The U.S.
federal income tax consequences applicable specifically to Non-U.S.
Holders are described below under the heading “Tax
Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders.”
This
summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
or the “Code,” its legislative history, Treasury
regulations promulgated thereunder, published rulings and court
decisions, all as currently in effect. These authorities are
subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly on a
retroactive basis.
This
discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income
taxation that may be relevant to any particular holder based on
such holder’s individual circumstances. In particular, this
discussion considers only holders that own and hold our ordinary
shares as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the
Code and does not address the alternative minimum tax. In addition,
this discussion does not address the U.S. federal income tax
consequences to holders that are subject to special rules,
including:
●
financial
institutions or financial services entities;
●
persons that are
subject to the mark-to-market accounting rules under Section 475 of
the Code;
●
governments or
agencies or instrumentalities thereof;
●
regulated
investment companies;
●
real estate
investment trusts;
●
certain
expatriates or former long-term residents of the United
States;
●
persons that
actually or constructively own 5% or more of our voting
shares;
●
persons that
acquired our ordinary shares pursuant to the exercise of employee
stock options, in connection with employee stock incentive plans or
otherwise as compensation;
●
persons that hold
or held our securities as part of a straddle, constructive sale,
hedging, conversion or other integrated transaction;
●
persons whose
functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;
●
controlled foreign
corporations; or
●
passive foreign
investment companies.
This
discussion does not address any aspect of U.S. federal non-income
tax laws, such as gift or estate tax laws, state, local or non-U.S.
tax laws or, except as discussed herein, any tax reporting
obligations applicable to a holder of our ordinary shares.
Additionally, this discussion does not consider the tax treatment
of partnerships or other pass-through entities or persons who hold
our ordinary shares through such entities. If a partnership (or
other entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income
tax purposes) is the beneficial owner of our ordinary shares, the
U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in the partnership
will generally depend on the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. This discussion also assumes that
any distribution made (or deemed made) by us on our ordinary shares
and any consideration received (or deemed received) by a holder in
consideration for the sale or other disposition of such ordinary
shares will be in U.S. dollars.
We have
not sought, and will not seek, a ruling from the Internal Revenue
Service, or the “IRS,” or an opinion of counsel as to
any U.S. federal income tax consequence described herein. The IRS
may disagree with the description herein, and its determination may
be upheld by a court. Moreover, there can be no assurance that
future legislation, regulations, administrative rulings or court
decisions will not adversely affect the accuracy of the statements
in this discussion.
BECAUSE
OF THE COMPLEXITY OF THE TAX LAWS AND BECAUSE THE TAX CONSEQUENCES
TO ANY PARTICULAR HOLDER OF OUR SECURITIES MAY BE AFFECTED BY
MATTERS NOT DISCUSSED HEREIN, EACH HOLDER OF OUR SECURITIES IS
URGED TO CONSULT WITH ITS TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE SPECIFIC
TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF
OUR SECURITIES, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT OF STATE,
LOCAL AND NON-U.S. TAX LAWS, AS WELL AS U.S. FEDERAL TAX LAWS AND
APPLICABLE TAX TREATIES.
Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders
Taxation of Cash Distributions Paid on Ordinary Shares
Subject
to the passive foreign investment company, or “PFIC,”
rules discussed below, a U.S. Holder generally will be required to
include in gross income as ordinary income the amount of any cash
dividend paid on our ordinary shares. A cash distribution on our
ordinary shares generally will be treated as a dividend for U.S.
federal income tax purposes to the extent paid out of our current
or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S.
federal income tax principles). Such dividend generally will not be
eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to
domestic corporations in respect of dividends received from other
domestic corporations. The portion of such distribution, if any, in
excess of such earnings and profits generally will constitute a
return of capital that will be applied against and reduce the U.S.
Holder’s adjusted tax basis in such ordinary shares (but not
below zero). Any remaining excess will be treated as gain from the
sale or other taxable disposition of such ordinary shares and will
be treated as described under “—Taxation on the
Disposition of Ordinary Shares” below.
With
respect to non-corporate U.S. Holders, such dividends may be
subject to U.S. federal income tax at the lower applicable
long-term capital gains tax rate (see “—Taxation on the
Disposition of Ordinary Shares” below) provided that (1) our
ordinary shares are readily tradable on an established securities
market in the United States or, in the event we are deemed to be a
Chinese “resident enterprise” under the EIT Law, we are
eligible for the benefits of the Agreement between the Government
of the United States of America and the Government of the
People’s Republic of China for the Avoidance of Double
Taxation and the Prevention of Tax Evasion with Respect to Taxes on
Income, or the “U.S.-PRC Tax Treaty,” (2) we are not a
PFIC, as discussed below, for either the taxable year in which the
dividend was paid or the preceding taxable year, and (3) certain
holding period requirements are met. Under published IRS authority,
ordinary shares are considered for purposes of clause (1) above to
be readily tradable on an established securities market in the
United States only if they are listed on certain exchanges, which
presently do not include the OTC QB. Because our ordinary shares
are currently quoted only on the OTC QB and, in any event, we may
be treated as a PFIC (as discussed below), any cash dividends paid
on our ordinary shares currently may not qualify for the lower
rate. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding
the availability of the lower rate for any cash dividends paid with
respect to our ordinary shares.
If a
PRC income tax applies to cash dividends paid to a U.S. Holder on
our ordinary shares, such tax may be treated as a foreign tax
eligible for a deduction from such holder’s U.S. federal
taxable income or a foreign tax credit against such holder’s
U.S. federal income tax liability (subject to applicable conditions
and limitations). In addition, if such PRC tax applies to any such
dividends, a U.S. Holder may be entitled to certain benefits under
the U.S.-PRC Tax Treaty, if such holder is considered a resident of
the United States for purposes of, and otherwise meets the
requirements of, the U.S.-PRC Tax Treaty. U.S. Holders should
consult their own tax advisors regarding the deduction or credit
for any such PRC tax and their eligibility for the benefits of the
U.S.-PRC Tax Treaty.
Taxation on the Disposition of Ordinary Shares
Upon a
sale or other taxable disposition of our ordinary shares and
subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, a U.S. Holder generally
will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the
difference between the amount realized and the U.S. Holder’s
adjusted tax basis in such ordinary shares.
The
regular U.S. federal income tax rate on capital gains recognized by
U.S. Holders generally is the same as the U.S. federal income tax
rate on ordinary income, except that long-term capital gains
recognized by non-corporate U.S. Holders are generally subject to
U.S. federal income tax at a maximum regular rate of 20%. Capital
gain or loss will constitute long-term capital gain or loss if the
U.S. Holder’s holding period for the ordinary shares exceeds
one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to various
limitations.
If a
PRC income tax applies to any gain from the disposition of our
ordinary shares by a U.S. Holder, such tax may be treated as a
foreign tax eligible for a deduction from such holder’s U.S.
federal taxable income or a foreign tax credit against such
holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability (subject to
applicable conditions and limitations). In addition, if such PRC
tax applies to any such gain, a U.S. Holder may be entitled to
certain benefits under the U.S.-PRC Tax Treaty, if such holder is
considered a resident of the United States for purposes of, and
otherwise meets the requirements of, the U.S.-PRC Tax Treaty. U.S.
Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the
deduction or credit for any such PRC tax and their eligibility for
the benefits of the U.S.-PRC Tax Treaty.
Additional Taxes
U.S.
Holders that are individuals, estates or trusts and whose income
exceeds certain thresholds generally will be subject to a 3.8%
Medicare contribution tax on unearned income, including, without
limitation, dividends on, and gains from the sale or other taxable
disposition of, our ordinary shares, subject to certain limitations
and exceptions. Under applicable regulations, in the absence of a
special election, such unearned income generally would not include
income inclusions under the qualified electing fund, or QEF, rules
discussed below under “— Passive Foreign Investment
Company Rules,” but would include distributions of earnings
and profits from a QEF. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax
advisors regarding the effect, if any, of such tax on their
ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules
A
foreign (i.e., non-U.S.) corporation will be a PFIC if at least 75%
of its gross income in a taxable year of the foreign corporation,
including its pro rata share of the gross income of any corporation
in which it is considered to own at least 25% of the shares by
value, is passive income. Alternatively, a foreign corporation will
be a PFIC if at least 50% of its assets in a taxable year of the
foreign corporation, ordinarily determined based on fair market
value and averaged quarterly over the year, including its pro rata
share of the assets of any corporation in which it is considered to
own at least 25% of the shares by value, are held for the
production of, or produce, passive income. Passive income generally
includes dividends, interest, rents and royalties (other than
certain rents or royalties derived from the active conduct of a
trade or business), and gains from the disposition of passive
assets.
Based
on the composition (and estimated values) of the assets and the
nature of the income of us and our subsidiaries for our 2016
taxable year, we may be treated as a PFIC for our 2016 taxable
year. However, since we have not performed a definitive analysis
with respect to our PFIC status for our 2016 taxable year, there
can be no assurance with respect to our status as a PFIC for such
taxable year. There also could be no assurance with respect to our
PFIC status for our current (2017) taxable year or any future
taxable year. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax
advisors regarding the possible application of the PFIC
rules.
If we
are determined to be a PFIC for any taxable year (or portion
thereof) that is included in the holding period of a U.S. Holder of
our ordinary shares and the U.S. Holder did not make either a
timely QEF election for our first taxable year as a PFIC in which
the U.S. Holder held (or was deemed to hold) our ordinary shares, a
QEF election along with a purging election or a mark-to-market
election, each as described below, such holder generally will be
subject to special rules for regular U.S. federal income tax
purposes with respect to:
●
any gain
recognized by the U.S. Holder on the sale or other disposition of
our ordinary shares; and
●
any “excess
distribution” made to the U.S. Holder (generally, the excess
of the amount of any distributions to such U.S. Holder during a
taxable year of the U.S. Holder over 125% of the average annual
distributions received by such U.S. Holder in respect of the
ordinary shares during the three preceding taxable years of such
U.S. Holder or, if shorter, such U.S. Holder’s holding period
for the ordinary shares).
Under
these rules,
●
the U.S.
Holder’s gain or excess distribution will be allocated
ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the
ordinary shares;
●
the amount
allocated to the U.S. Holder’s taxable year in which the U.S.
Holder recognized the gain or received the excess distribution, or
to the period in the U.S. Holder’s holding period before the
first day of our first taxable year in which we qualified as a
PFIC, will be taxed as ordinary income;
●
the amount
allocated to other taxable years (or portions thereof) of the U.S.
Holder and included in its holding period will be taxed at the
highest tax rate in effect for that year and applicable to the U.S.
Holder; and
●
the interest
charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed
in respect of the tax attributable to each such other taxable year
of the U.S. Holder.
In
general, if we are determined to be a PFIC, a U.S. Holder may avoid
the PFIC tax consequences described above in respect to our
ordinary shares by making a timely QEF election (or a QEF election
along with a purging election). Pursuant to the QEF election, a
U.S. Holder generally will be required to include in income its pro
rata share of our net capital gains (as long-term capital gain) and
other earnings and profits (as ordinary income), on a current
basis, in each case whether or not distributed, in the taxable year
of the U.S. Holder in which or with which our taxable year ends if
we are treated as a PFIC for that taxable year. A U.S. Holder may
make a separate election to defer the payment of taxes on
undistributed income inclusions under the QEF rules, but if
deferred, any such taxes will be subject to an interest
charge.
The QEF
election is made on a shareholder-by-shareholder basis and, once
made, can be revoked only with the consent of the IRS. A U.S.
Holder generally makes a QEF election by attaching a completed IRS
Form 8621 (Information Return by a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign
Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund), including the
information provided in a PFIC annual information statement, to a
timely filed U.S. federal income tax return for the taxable year to
which the election relates. Retroactive QEF elections generally may
be made only by filing a protective statement with such return and
if certain other conditions are met or with the consent of the
IRS.
In
order to comply with the requirements of a QEF election, a U.S.
Holder must receive certain information from us. Upon request from
a U.S. Holder, we will endeavor to provide to the U.S. Holder no
later than 90 days after the request such information as the IRS
may require, including a PFIC annual information statement, in
order to enable the U.S. Holder to make and maintain a QEF
election. However, there is no assurance that we will have timely
knowledge of our status as a PFIC in the future or of the required
information to be provided.
If a
U.S. Holder has made a QEF election with respect to our ordinary
shares, and the special tax and interest charge rules do not apply
to such shares (because of a timely QEF election for our first
taxable year as a PFIC in which the U.S. Holder holds (or is deemed
to hold) such shares or a QEF election, along with a purge of the
PFIC taint pursuant to a purging election), any gain recognized on
the sale or other taxable disposition of our ordinary shares
generally will be taxable as capital gain and no interest charge
will be imposed. As discussed above, for regular U.S. federal
income tax purposes, U.S. Holders of a QEF generally are currently
taxed on their pro rata shares of the QEF’s earnings and
profits, whether or not distributed. In such case, a subsequent
distribution of such earnings and profits that were previously
included in income generally should not be taxable as a dividend to
such U.S. Holders. The adjusted tax basis of a U.S. Holder’s
shares in a QEF will be increased by amounts that are included in
income, and decreased by amounts distributed but not taxed as
dividends, under the above rules. Similar basis adjustments apply
to property if by reason of holding such property the U.S. Holder
is treated under the applicable attribution rules as owning shares
in a QEF.
Although
a determination as to our PFIC status will be made annually, the
initial determination that we are a PFIC will generally apply for
subsequent years to a U.S. Holder who held our ordinary shares
while we were a PFIC, whether or not we meet the test for PFIC
status in those subsequent years. A U.S. Holder who makes the QEF
election discussed above for our first taxable year as a PFIC in
which the U.S. Holder holds (or is deemed to hold) our ordinary
shares, however, will not be subject to the PFIC tax and interest
charge rules discussed above in respect to such shares. In
addition, such U.S. Holder will not be subject to the QEF inclusion
regime with respect to such shares for any of our taxable years
that end within or with a taxable year of the U.S. Holder and in
which we are not a PFIC. On the other hand, if the QEF election is
not effective for each of our taxable years in which we are a PFIC
and during which the U.S. Holder holds (or is deemed to hold) our
ordinary shares, the PFIC rules discussed above will continue to
apply to such shares unless the holder files on a timely filed U.S.
federal income tax return (including extensions) a QEF election and
a purging election to recognize under the rules of Section 1291 of
the Code any gain that the U.S. Holder would otherwise recognize if
the U.S. Holder had sold our ordinary shares for their fair market
value on the “qualification date.” The qualification
date is the first day of our tax year in which we qualify as a QEF
with respect to such U.S. Holder. The purging election can only be
made if such U.S. Holder held our ordinary shares on the
qualification date. The gain recognized by the purging election
will be subject to the special tax and interest charge rules
treating the gain as an excess distribution, as described above. As
a result of the purging election, the U.S. Holder will increase the
adjusted tax basis in its ordinary shares by the amount of the gain
recognized and will also have a new holding period in the ordinary
shares for purposes of the PFIC rules.
Alternatively,
if a U.S. Holder, at the close of its taxable year, owns shares in
a PFIC that are treated as marketable stock, the U.S. Holder may
make a mark-to-market election with respect to such shares for such
taxable year. If the U.S. Holder makes a valid mark-to-market
election for the first taxable year of the U.S. Holder in which the
U.S. Holder holds (or is deemed to hold) our ordinary shares and
for which we are determined to be a PFIC, such holder generally
will not be subject to the PFIC rules described above in respect to
its ordinary shares as long as such shares continue to be treated
as marketable stock. Instead, in general, the U.S. Holder will
include as ordinary income for each year that we are treated as a
PFIC the excess, if any, of the fair market value of its ordinary
shares at the end of its taxable year over the adjusted basis in
its ordinary shares. The U.S. Holder also will be allowed to take
an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the adjusted
basis of its ordinary shares over the fair market value of its
ordinary shares at the end of its taxable year (but only to the
extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result
of the mark-to-market election). The U.S. Holder’s basis in
its ordinary shares will be adjusted to reflect any such income or
loss amounts, and any further gain recognized on a sale or other
taxable disposition of the ordinary shares in a taxable year in
which we are treated as a PFIC generally will be treated as
ordinary income. Special tax rules may apply if a U.S. Holder makes
a mark-to-market election for a taxable year after the first
taxable year in which the U.S. Holder holds (or is deemed to hold)
our ordinary shares and for which we are determined to be a
PFIC.
The
mark-to-market election is available only for stock that is
regularly traded on a national securities exchange that is
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or on a
foreign exchange or market that the IRS determines has rules
sufficient to ensure that the market price represents a legitimate
and sound fair market value. The OTC QB currently is not considered
to be a national securities exchange that would allow a U.S. Holder
to make or maintain a mark-to-market election. Because our ordinary
shares are currently quoted only on the OTC QB, such shares may not
qualify as marketable stock for purposes of the
election.
If we
are a PFIC and, at any time, have a foreign subsidiary that is
classified as a PFIC, a U.S. Holder of our ordinary shares
generally would be deemed to own a portion of the shares of such
lower-tier PFIC, and generally could incur liability for the
deferred tax and interest charge described above if we receive a
distribution from, or dispose of all or part of our interest in, or
the U.S. Holder were otherwise deemed to have disposed of an
interest in, the lower-tier PFIC. Upon request, we will endeavor to
cause any lower-tier PFIC to provide to a U.S. Holder no later than
90 days after the request the information that may be required to
make or maintain a QEF election with respect to the lower- tier
PFIC. However, there is no assurance that we will have timely
knowledge of the status of any such lower-tier PFIC or will be able
to cause the lower-tier PFIC to provide the required information.
U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding
the tax issues raised by lower-tier PFICs.
A U.S.
Holder that owns (or is deemed to own) shares in a PFIC during any
taxable year of the U.S. Holder may have to file an IRS Form 8621
(whether or not a QEF election or mark-to-market election is or has
been made) with such U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax
return and provide such other information as may be required by the
U.S. Treasury Department.
The
rules dealing with PFICs and with the QEF and mark-to-market
elections are very complex and are affected by various factors in
addition to those described above. Accordingly, U.S. Holders of our
ordinary shares should consult their own tax advisors concerning
the application of the PFIC rules to our ordinary shares under
their particular circumstances.
Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders
Cash
dividends paid or deemed paid to a Non-U.S. Holder in respect to
its ordinary shares generally will not be subject to U.S. federal
income tax, unless the dividends are effectively connected with the
Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the
United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty,
are attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base that
such holder maintains or maintained in the United
States).
In
addition, a Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S.
federal income tax on any gain attributable to a sale or other
taxable disposition of our ordinary shares unless such gain is
effectively connected with its conduct of a trade or business in
the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax
treaty, is attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base
that such holder maintains or maintained in the United States) or
the Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United
States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of sale or other
disposition and certain other conditions are met (in which case,
such gain from U.S. sources generally is subject to U.S. federal
income tax at a 30% rate or a lower applicable tax treaty
rate).
Dividends
and gains that are effectively connected with the Non-U.S.
Holder’s conduct of a trade or business in the United States
(and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, are
attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base that such
holder maintains or maintained in the United States) generally will
be subject to regular U.S. federal income tax at the same regular
U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to a comparable U.S.
Holder and, in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, may also be subject to an
additional branch profits tax at a 30% rate or a lower applicable
tax treaty rate.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
In
general, information reporting for U.S. federal income tax purposes
should apply to distributions made on our ordinary shares within
the United States to a U.S. Holder (other than an exempt recipient)
and to the proceeds from sales and other dispositions of our
securities by a U.S. Holder (other than an exempt recipient) to or
through a U.S. office of a broker. Payments made (and sales and
other dispositions effected at an office) outside the United States
will be subject to information reporting in limited circumstances.
In addition, certain information concerning a U.S. Holder’s
adjusted tax basis in its ordinary shares and adjustments to that
tax basis and whether any gain or loss with respect to such
ordinary shares is long-term or short-term also may be required to
be reported to the IRS, and certain holders may be required to file
an IRS Form 8938 (Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets)
to report their interest in our ordinary shares.
Moreover,
backup withholding of U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 28%
generally will apply to dividends paid on our ordinary shares to a
U.S. Holder (other than an exempt recipient) and the proceeds from
sales and other dispositions of our ordinary shares by a U.S.
Holder (other than an exempt recipient), in each case who (a) fails
to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number; (b) is
notified by the IRS that backup withholding is required; or (c) in
certain circumstances, fails to comply with applicable
certification requirements.
A
Non-U.S. Holder generally may eliminate the requirement for
information reporting and backup withholding by providing
certification of its foreign status, under penalties of perjury, on
a duly executed applicable IRS Form W-8 or by otherwise
establishing an exemption.
Backup
withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the amount of any
backup withholding will be allowed as a credit against a U.S.
Holder’s or a Non-U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax
liability and may entitle such holder to a refund, provided that
certain required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the
application of backup withholding and the availability of and
procedures for obtaining an exemption from backup withholding in
their particular circumstances.
F.
Dividends and Paying Agents
Not
required.
G.
Statement by Experts
Not
required.
H.
Documents on Display
Documents
concerning us that are referred to in this document may be
inspected at our principal executive offices at 27/F, Kai Yuan
Finance Center, No. 5, East Main Street, Shijiazhuang, Hebei,
People’s Republic of China, Tel: +86 311 8382 7688, Fax: +86
311 8381 9636.
In
addition, we will file annual reports and other information with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. We will file annual reports
on Form 20-F and submit other information under cover of Form 6-K.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the proxy
requirements of Section 14 of the Exchange Act and our officers,
directors and principal shareholders will be exempt from the
insider short-swing disclosure and profit recovery rules of Section
16 of the Exchange Act. Annual reports and other information we
file with the Commission may be inspected at the public reference
facilities maintained by the Commission at 100 F. Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549, and copies of all or any part thereof may
be obtained from such offices upon payment of the prescribed fees.
You may call the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further
information on the operation of the public reference rooms and you
can request copies of the documents upon payment of a duplicating
fee, by writing to the Commission. In addition, the Commission
maintains a web site that contains reports and other information
regarding registrants (including us) that file electronically with
the Commission which can be accessed at
http://www.sec.gov
.
I.
Subsidiary Information
Not
required.
ITEM 11.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET
RISK
For
disclosures regarding market risk exposure, see “Item 5 -
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Liquidity and
Capital Resources – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk” above.
ITEM 12.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
None.