PART I
	 
	ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND
	ADVISERS
	 
	Not
	Applicable.
	 
	ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
	 
	Not
	Applicable.
	 
	ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
	 
	A. 
	Selected financial
	data
	 
	The selected historical consolidated financial information set
	forth below has been derived from our financial statements for the
	fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
	 
| 
	 
	Consolidated
	Statement of Comprehensive Loss
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
 
	Year
	ended
 
	December 31,
	2017
 | 
	 
	 
 
	Year
	ended
 
	December 31,
	2016
 | 
| 
	Revenues
 | 
	 
	$
	109,173
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Gross
	Profit
 | 
	 
	$
	45,223
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Net and
	Comprehensive Loss
 | 
	 
	$
	11,366,372
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	8,973,347
	 
 | 
| 
	Loss per Share
	– Basic and Diluted
 | 
	 
	$
	(0.35
	)
 | 
	 
	$
	(0.27
	)
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
	Consolidated
	Statements of Financial Position
 | 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Cash
 | 
	 
	$
	8,610,996
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	3,916,283
	 
 | 
| 
	Current
	Assets
 | 
	 
	$
	10,007,684
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	4,437,152
	 
 | 
| 
	Total
	Assets
 | 
	 
	$
	12,661,381
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	4,787,766
	 
 | 
| 
	Current
	Liabilities
 | 
	 
	$
	3,354,675
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	881,176
	 
 | 
| 
	Total
	Liabilities
 | 
	 
	$
	7,010,365
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	881,176
	 
 | 
| 
	Shareholders’
	Equity (Deficiency)
 | 
	 
	$
	5,651,016
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	3,906,590
	 
 | 
 
	 
	Selected
	Pro Forma
	Financial Data
	 
	On
	October 18, 2017, we acquired all of the issued share capital of
	Intermeccanica pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement in exchange
	for a payment of $2.5 million. Intermeccanica is a
	custom car manufacturer with over 50 years of
	expertise.
	 
	The
	unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information gives
	effect to the acquisition as if it had been completed on January 1,
	2017. Our historical consolidated financial information and that of
	Intermeccanica have been adjusted in the unaudited pro forma
	condensed combined financial information to give effect to events
	that are (1) directly attributable to the acquisition,
	(2) factually supportable, and (3) expected to have a
	continuing impact on the combined results. The unaudited pro forma
	adjustments are based upon currently available information and
	assumptions that we believe to be reasonable. The pro forma
	adjustments and related assumptions are described in the notes
	accompanying the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
	information included elsewhere in this report.
	 
	You
	should read this unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
	information in conjunction with our financial and the accompanying
	notes, the pro forma financial statements the accompanying notes
	and the section of this report entitled "
	Operating and Financial Review and
	Prospects
	", each of which are included elsewhere in this
	report.
	 
	3
	 
	 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	Year
	Ended December 31, 2017
 | 
| 
	 
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
	 
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
	Revenue
 | 
	 
	$
	1,179,595
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	(501,461
	)
 | 
	 
	$
	678,134
	 
 | 
| 
	Cost
	of revenue
 | 
	 
	 
	758,948
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(385,971
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	372,977
	 
 | 
| 
	Gross
	profit
 | 
	 
	 
	420,647
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(115,490
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	305,157
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Operating
	expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Amortization
 | 
	 
	 
	26,142
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	122,468
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	148,610
	 
 | 
| 
	General and
	administrative expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	373,947
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	2,314,714
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(95,941
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	2,592,720
	 
 | 
| 
	Research and
	development expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	4,358,285
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(19,521
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	4,338,764
	 
 | 
| 
	Sales and marketing
	expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	4,432
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	630,999
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	635,431
	 
 | 
| 
	Stock-based
	compensation expense
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	889,511
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	889,511
	 
 | 
| 
	Share-based payment
	expense
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-1,085,716
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,085,716
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(404,521
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(9,401,693
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(115,462
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(9,690,752
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Income/(Loss)
	before other items
 | 
	 
	 
	16,126
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(9,401,693
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(28
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(9,385,595
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Other
	items
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Accretion interest
	expense
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	69,561
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	69,561
	 
 | 
| 
	Changes in fair
	value of warrant derivative
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	186,269
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	186,269
	 
 | 
| 
	Finder’s fee
	on convertible loan
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	258,542
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	258,542
	 
 | 
| 
	Impairment of
	goodwill
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,342,794
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,342,794
	 
 | 
| 
	Foreign exchange
	(gain)/loss
 | 
	 
	 
	(11,806
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	22,068
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	10,262
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Net
	and comprehensive loss
 | 
	 
	$
	27,932
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	(9,938,133
	)
 | 
	 
	$
	(1,342,766
	)
 | 
	 
	$
	(11,253,023
	)
 | 
 
	 
	B. 
	Capitalization and
	Indebtedness
	 
	Not
	applicable.
	 
	C. 
	Reasons for the
	offer and use of proceeds
	 
	Not
	applicable.
	 
	D. 
	Risk
	Factors
	 
	An investment in our
	common
	shares carries a significant degree of
	risk. You should carefully consider the following risks, as well as
	the other information contained in this prospectus, including our
	financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this
	prospectus, before you decide to purchase our shares. Any one of
	these risks and uncertainties has the potential to cause material
	adverse effects on our business, prospects, financial condition and
	operating results which could cause actual results to differ
	materially from any forward-looking statements expressed by us and
	a significant decrease in the value of our common shares. Refer to
	“Forward-Looking Statements”.
	 
	We have not be successful in preventing the material adverse
	effects that any of the following risks and uncertainties may
	cause. These potential risks and uncertainties may not be a
	complete list of the risks and uncertainties facing us. There may
	be additional risks and uncertainties that we are presently unaware
	of, or presently consider immaterial, that may become material in
	the future and have a material adverse effect on us. You could lose
	all or a significant portion of your investment due to any of these
	risks and uncertainties.
	 
	Risks Related to our Business and Industry
	 
	We have a limited operating history and have not yet generated any
	revenues.
	 
	Our limited operating history makes evaluating our business and
	future prospects difficult. We were formed in February 2015, and we
	have not yet begun mass production or the commercial delivery of
	our first vehicle. To date, we have no revenues from the sale of
	electric vehicles as
	any amounts received from the sale of
	our pre-production electric vehicles were netted off against
	research and development costs as cost recovery and minimal revenue
	from the sale of custom cares
	. We
	intend in the longer term to derive revenues from the sales of our
	SOLO vehicle, our Super SOLO vehicle, our Tofino vehicle and other
	intended electric vehicles. The SOLO and Tofino are in development,
	and we do not expect to start delivering to the SOLO customers
	until the third quarter of 2018 or to the Tofino customers until
	2019. Our vehicles require significant investment prior to
	commercial introduction and may never be successfully developed or
	commercially successful.
	 
	4
	 
	 
	 
	We expect that we will experience an increase in losses prior to
	the launch of the SOLO, the Super SOLO or the Tofino.
	 
	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, we generated a net and
	comprehensive loss of $11,366,372, bringing our accumulated deficit
	to $21,335,552.
	We anticipate
	generating a significant loss for the current fiscal year. The
	independent auditor’s report on our financial statements
	includes an explanatory paragraph relating to our ability to
	continue as a going concern.
	 
	We have minimal revenues, are currently in debt and expect
	significant increases in costs and expenses to forestall profits
	for the foreseeable future, even if we generate revenues in the
	near term. Even if we are able to successfully develop the SOLO,
	the Super SOLO or the Tofino, they might not become commercially
	successful. If we are to ever achieve profitability we must have a
	successful commercial introduction and acceptance of our vehicles,
	which may not occur.
	 
	We expect the rate at which we will incur losses to increase
	significantly in future periods from current levels as
	we:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	design,
	develop and manufacture our vehicles and their
	components;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	develop
	and equip our manufacturing facility;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	build
	up inventories of parts and components for the SOLO, the Super SOLO
	and the Tofino;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	open
	Electrameccanica stores;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	expand
	our design, development, maintenance and repair
	capabilities;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	develop
	and increase our sales and marketing activities; and
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	develop
	and increase our general and administrative functions to support
	our growing operations.
 | 
 
	 
	Because we will incur the costs and expenses from these efforts
	before we receive any revenues with respect thereto, our losses in
	future periods will be significantly greater than the losses we
	would incur if we developed the business more slowly. In addition,
	we may find that these efforts are more expensive than we currently
	anticipate or that these efforts may not result in profits or even
	revenues, which would further increase our losses.
	 
	We currently have negative operating cash flows, and if we are
	unable to generate positive operating cash flows in the future our
	viability as an operating business will be adversely
	affected.
	 
	We have made significant up-front investments in research and
	development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative
	expenses to rapidly develop and expand our business. We are
	currently incurring expenditures related to our operations that
	have generated a negative operating cash flow. Operating cash flow
	may decline in certain circumstances, many of which are beyond our
	control. We might not generate sufficient revenues in the near
	future. Because we continue to incur such significant future
	expenditures for research and development, sales and marketing, and
	general and administrative expenses, we may continue to experience
	negative cash flow until we reach a sufficient level of sales with
	positive gross margins to cover operating expenses. An inability to
	generate positive cash flow until we reach a sufficient level of
	sales with positive gross margins to cover operating expenses or
	raise additional capital on reasonable terms will adversely affect
	our viability as an operating business.
	 
	To carry out our proposed business plan to develop, manufacture,
	sell and service electric vehicles, we will require a significant
	amount of capital.
	 
	To carry out our proposed business plan for the next twelve months,
	we estimate that we will need approximately $4.8 million at our
	current burn rate and an additional $22.7 million. We intend to
	raise our cash requirements for the next 12 months through the sale
	of our equity securities and, if needed, shareholder loans. If we
	are unsuccessful in raising enough funds through such
	capital-raising efforts, we may review other financing
	possibilities such as bank loans. Financing might not be available
	to us or, if available, only on terms that are not acceptable to
	us.
	 
	Our ability to obtain the necessary financing to carry out our
	business plan is subject to a number of factors, including general
	market conditions and investor acceptance of our business plan.
	These factors may make the timing, amount, terms and conditions of
	such financing unattractive or unavailable to us. If we are unable
	to raise sufficient funds, we will have to significantly reduce our
	spending, delay or cancel our planned activities or substantially
	change our current corporate structure. We might not be able to
	obtain any funding, and we might not have sufficient resources to
	conduct our business as projected, both of which could mean that we
	would be forced to curtail or discontinue our
	operations.
	 
	5
	 
	 
	 
	Terms of subsequent financings may adversely impact your
	investment.
	 
	We may have to engage in common equity, debt, or preferred stock
	financing in the future. Your rights and the value of your
	investment in the units could be reduced. Interest on debt
	securities could increase costs and negatively impacts operating
	results. Preferred stock could be issued in series from time to
	time with such designation, rights, preferences, and limitations as
	needed to raise capital. The terms of preferred stock could be more
	advantageous to those investors than to the holders of common
	shares. Likewise, if we issue warrants as part of any future
	financing, the terms of those warrants could be more advantageous
	to those investors than to the holders of warrants purchase in the
	units. In addition, if we need to raise more equity capital from
	the sale of common shares, institutional or other investors may
	negotiate terms at least as, and possibly more, favorable than the
	terms of your investment. C
	ommon
	shares which we sell could be sold into any market
	which develops, which could adversely affect the market
	price.
	 
	Our future growth depends upon consumers’ willingness to
	adopt three-wheeled single passenger electric
	vehicles.
	 
	Our growth highly depends upon the adoption by consumers of, and we
	are subject to an elevated risk of any reduced demand for,
	alternative fuel vehicles in general and electric vehicles in
	particular. If the market for three-wheeled single passenger
	electric vehicles does not develop as we expect or develops more
	slowly than we expect, our business, prospects, financial condition
	and operating results will be negatively impacted. The market for
	alternative fuel vehicles is relatively new, rapidly evolving,
	characterized by rapidly changing technologies, price competition,
	additional competitors, evolving government regulation and industry
	standards, frequent new vehicle announcements and changing consumer
	demands and behaviors. Factors that may influence the adoption of
	alternative fuel vehicles, and specifically electric vehicles,
	include:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	perceptions
	about electric vehicle quality, safety (in particular with respect
	to lithium-ion battery packs), design, performance and cost,
	especially if adverse events or accidents occur that are linked to
	the quality or safety of electric vehicles;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	perceptions
	about vehicle safety in general, in particular safety issues that
	may be attributed to the use of advanced technology, including
	vehicle electronics and braking systems;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	the
	limited range over which electric vehicles may be driven on a
	single battery charge;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	the
	decline of an electric vehicle’s range resulting from
	deterioration over time in the battery’s ability to hold a
	charge;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	concerns
	about electric grid capacity and reliability, which could derail
	our efforts to promote electric vehicles as a practical solution to
	vehicles which require gasoline;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	the
	availability of alternative fuel vehicles, including plug-in hybrid
	electric vehicles;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	improvements
	in the fuel economy of the internal combustion engine;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	the
	availability of service for electric vehicles;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	the
	environmental consciousness of consumers;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	volatility
	in the cost of oil and gasoline;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	government
	regulations and economic incentives promoting fuel efficiency and
	alternate forms of energy;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	access
	to charging stations, standardization of electric vehicle charging
	systems and consumers’ perceptions about convenience and cost
	to charge an electric vehicle;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	the
	availability of tax and other governmental incentives to purchase
	and operate electric vehicles or future regulation requiring
	increased use of nonpolluting vehicles; and
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	perceptions
	about and the actual cost of alternative fuel.
 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	The influence of any of the factors described above may cause
	current or potential customers not to purchase our electric
	vehicles, which would materially adversely affect our business,
	operating results, financial condition and prospects.
	 
	6
	 
	 
	 
	The range of our electric vehicles on a single charge declines over
	time which may negatively influence potential customers’
	decisions whether to purchase our vehicles.
	 
	The range of our electric vehicles on a single charge declines
	principally as a function of usage, time and charging patterns. For
	example, a customer’s use of their vehicle as well as the
	frequency with which they charge the battery of their vehicle can
	result in additional deterioration of the battery’s ability
	to hold a charge. We currently expect that our battery pack will
	retain approximately 85% of its ability to hold its initial charge
	after approximately 3,000 charge cycles and 8 years, which will
	result in a decrease to the vehicle’s initial range. Such
	battery deterioration and the related decrease in range may
	negatively influence potential customer decisions whether to
	purchase our vehicles, which may harm our ability to market and
	sell our vehicles.
	 
	Developments in alternative technologies or improvements in the
	internal combustion engine may materially adversely affect the
	demand for our electric vehicles.
	 
	Significant developments in alternative technologies, such as
	advanced diesel, ethanol, fuel cells or compressed natural gas, or
	improvements in the fuel economy of the internal combustion engine,
	may materially and adversely affect our business and prospects in
	ways we do not currently anticipate. For example, fuel which is
	abundant and relatively inexpensive in North America, such as
	compressed natural gas, may emerge as consumers’ preferred
	alternative to petroleum based propulsion. Any failure by us to
	develop new or enhanced technologies or processes, or to react to
	changes in existing technologies, could materially delay our
	development and introduction of new and enhanced electric vehicles,
	which could result in the loss of competitiveness of our vehicles,
	decreased revenue and a loss of market share to
	competitors.
	 
	If we are unable to keep up with advances in electric vehicle
	technology, we may suffer a decline in our competitive
	position.
	 
	We may be unable to keep up with changes in electric vehicle
	technology and, as a result, may suffer a decline in our
	competitive position. Any failure to keep up with advances in
	electric vehicle technology would result in a decline in our
	competitive position which would materially and adversely affect
	our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition.
	Our research and development efforts may not be sufficient to adapt
	to changes in electric vehicle technology. As technologies change
	we plan to upgrade or adapt our vehicles and introduce new models
	to continue to provide vehicles with the latest technology, in
	particular battery cell technology. However, our vehicles may not
	compete effectively with alternative vehicles if we are not able to
	source and integrate the latest technology into our vehicles. For
	example, we do not manufacture battery cells which makes us depend
	upon other suppliers of battery cell technology for our battery
	packs.
	 
	If we are unable to design, develop, market and sell new electric
	vehicles and services that address additional market opportunities,
	our business, prospects and operating results will
	suffer.
	 
	We may not be able to successfully develop new electric vehicles
	and services, address new market segments or develop a
	significantly broader customer base. To date, we have focused our
	business on the sale of the SOLO, a three-wheeled single passenger
	electric vehicle and have targeted mainly urban residents of modest
	means. We will need to address additional markets and expand our
	customer demographic to further grow our business. Our failure to
	address additional market opportunities would harm our business,
	financial condition, operating results and prospects.
	 
	Demand in the vehicle industry is highly volatile.
	 
	Volatility of demand in the vehicle industry may materially and
	adversely affect our business, prospects, operating results and
	financial condition. The markets in which we will be competing have
	been subject to considerable volatility in demand in recent
	periods. Demand for automobile sales depends to a large extent on
	general, economic, political and social conditions in a given
	market and the introduction of new vehicles and technologies. As a
	new start-up manufacturer, we will have fewer financial resources
	than more established vehicle manufacturers to withstand changes in
	the market and disruptions in demand.
	 
	We depend on a third-party for our near-term manufacturing
	needs.
	 
	In October 2017, we entered into a manufacturing agreement with
	Zongshen, a company located in the People’s Republic of
	China, to produce 75,000 SOLO vehicles over the next three years.
	The delivery of SOLO vehicles to our future customers and the
	revenue derived therefrom depends on Zongshen’s ability to
	fulfill its obligations under that manufacturing agreement.
	Zongshen’s ability to fulfill its obligations is outside of
	our control and depends on a variety of factors including
	Zongshen’s operations, Zongshen’s financial condition
	and geopolitical and economic risks that could affect China. If
	Zongshen is unable to fulfill its obligations or is only able to
	partially fulfill its obligations, we will not be able to sell our
	SOLO vehicle in the volumes anticipated on the timetable that we
	anticipate, if at all.
	 
	7
	 
	 
	 
	We do not currently have arrangements in place that will allow us
	to fully execute our business plan.
	 
	To sell our vehicles as envisioned, we will need to enter into
	agreements and arrangements that are not currently in place. These
	include, entering into agreements with dealerships, arranging for
	the transportation of SOLOs delivered pursuant to our manufacturing
	agreement with Zongshen, obtaining battery and other essential
	supplies in the quantities that we require, entering into
	manufacturing agreements for the Super SOLO and the Tofino and
	acquiring additional manufacturing capability. If we are unable to
	enter into such agreements or are only able to do so on terms that
	are unfavorable to us, we may not be able to fully carry out our
	business plans.
	 
	We depend on certain key personnel, and our success will depend on
	our continued ability to retain and attract such qualified
	personnel.
	 
	Our success depends on the efforts, abilities and continued service
	of Jerry Kroll - Chief Executive Officer, Henry Reisner - Chief
	Operating Officer, Kulwant Sandher - Chief Financial Officer, and
	Ed Theobald – General Manager. A number of these key
	employees and consultants have significant experience in the
	automobile manufacturing industry. A loss of service from any one
	of these individuals may adversely affect our operations, and we
	may have difficulty or may not be able to locate and hire a
	suitable replacement. We have not obtained any “key
	person” insurance on certain key personnel.
	 
	Since we have little experience in mass-producing electric
	vehicles, any delays or difficulties in transitioning from
	producing custom vehicles to mass-producing vehicles may have a
	material adverse effect on our business, prospects and operating
	results.
	 
	Our management team has experience in producing custom designed
	vehicles and is now switching focus to mass producing electric
	vehicles in a rapidly evolving and competitive market. If we are
	unable to implement our business plans in the timeframe estimated
	by management and successfully transition into a mass-producing
	electric vehicle manufacturing business, then our business,
	prospects, operating results and financial condition will be
	negatively impacted and our ability to grow our business will be
	harmed.
	 
	We are subject to numerous environmental and health and safety laws
	and any breach of such laws may have a material adverse effect on
	our business and operating results.
	 
	We are subject to numerous environmental and health and safety
	laws, including statutes, regulations, bylaws and other legal
	requirements. These laws relate to the generation, use, handling,
	storage, transportation and disposal of regulated substances,
	including hazardous substances (such as batteries), dangerous goods
	and waste, emissions or discharges into soil, water and air,
	including noise and odors (which could result in remediation
	obligations), and occupational health and safety matters, including
	indoor air quality. These legal requirements vary by location and
	can arise under federal, provincial, state or municipal laws. Any
	breach of such laws and/or requirements would have a material
	adverse effect on our company and its operating
	results.
	 
	Our vehicles are subject to motor vehicle standards and the failure
	to satisfy such mandated safety standards would have a material
	adverse effect on our business and operating results.
	 
	All vehicles sold must comply with federal, state and provincial
	motor vehicle safety standards. In both Canada and the United
	States vehicles that meet or exceed all federally mandated safety
	standards are certified under the federal regulations. In this
	regard, Canadian and U.S. motor vehicle safety standards are
	substantially the same. Rigorous testing and the use of approved
	materials and equipment are among the requirements for achieving
	federal certification. Failure by us to have the SOLO, the Super
	Solo, the Tofino or any future model electric vehicle satisfy motor
	vehicle standards would have a material adverse effect on our
	business and operating results.
	 
	If we are unable to reduce and adequately control the costs
	associated with operating our business, including our costs of
	manufacturing, sales and materials, our business, financial
	condition, operating results and prospects will
	suffer.
	 
	If we are unable to reduce and/or maintain a sufficiently low level
	of costs for designing, manufacturing, marketing, selling and
	distributing and servicing our electric vehicles relative to their
	selling prices, our operating results, gross margins, business and
	prospects could be materially and adversely impacted.
	 
	If our vehicles fail to perform as expected, our ability to
	develop, market and sell our electric vehicles could be
	harmed.
	 
	Our vehicles may contain defects in design and manufacture that may
	cause them not to perform as expected or that may require repair.
	For example, our vehicles use a substantial amount of software code
	to operate. Software products are inherently complex and often
	contain defects and errors when first introduced. While we have
	performed extensive internal testing, we currently have a very
	limited frame of reference by which to evaluate the performance of
	our SOLO in the hands of our customers and currently have no frame
	of reference by which to evaluate the performance of our vehicles
	after several years of customer driving. A similar evaluation of
	the Super SOLO and the Tofino is further behind.
	 
	8
	 
	 
	 
	We have very limited experience servicing our vehicles. If we are
	unable to address the service requirements of our future customers
	our business will be materially and adversely
	affected.
	 
	If we are unable to successfully address the service requirements
	of our future customers our business and prospects will be
	materially and adversely affected. In addition, we anticipate the
	level and quality of the service we will provide our customers will
	have a direct impact on the success of our future vehicles. If we
	are unable to satisfactorily service our customers, our ability to
	generate customer loyalty, grow our business and sell additional
	vehicles could be impaired.
	 
	We have very limited experience servicing our vehicles. As
	of
	April 11,
	2018, we had not
	sold any vehicles and had only delivered four pre-production
	vehicles to customers. We do not plan for mass production to begin
	for SOLO vehicles until the end of the second quarter or during the
	third quarter of 2018 or for the Tofino until 2019. The total
	number of SOLOs that we have produced is 25. Throughout its
	history, Intermeccanica has produced approximately 2,500 cars,
	which includes, providing after sales support and servicing. We do
	not have any experience servicing the SOLO or the Tofino as a
	limited number of SOLOS have been produced and the Tofino has not
	yet been produced. Servicing electric vehicles is different than
	servicing vehicles with internal combustion engines and requires
	specialized skills, including high voltage training and servicing
	techniques.
	 
	We may not succeed in establishing, maintaining and strengthening
	the Electrameccanica brand, which would materially and adversely
	affect customer acceptance of our vehicles and components and our
	business, revenues and prospects.
	 
	Our business and prospects heavily depend on our ability to
	develop, maintain and strengthen the Electrameccanica brand. Any
	failure to develop, maintain and strengthen our brand may
	materially and adversely affect our ability to sell our planned
	electric vehicles. If we are not able to establish, maintain and
	strengthen our brand, we may lose the opportunity to build a
	critical mass of customers. Promoting and positioning our brand
	will likely depend significantly on our ability to provide high
	quality electric cars and maintenance and repair services, and we
	have very limited experience in these areas. In addition, we expect
	that our ability to develop, maintain and strengthen the
	Electrameccanica brand will also depend heavily on the success of
	our marketing efforts. To date, we have limited experience with
	marketing activities as we have relied primarily on the internet,
	word of mouth and attendance at industry trade shows to promote our
	brand. To further promote our brand, we may be required to change
	our marketing practices, which could result in substantially
	increased advertising expenses, including the need to use
	traditional media such as television, radio and print. The
	automobile industry is intensely competitive, and we may not be
	successful in building, maintaining and strengthening our brand.
	Many of our current and potential competitors, particularly
	automobile manufacturers headquartered in Detroit, Japan and the
	European Union, have greater name recognition, broader customer
	relationships and substantially greater marketing resources than we
	do. If we do not develop and maintain a strong brand, our business,
	prospects, financial condition and operating results will be
	materially and adversely impacted.
	 
	Increases in costs, disruption of supply or shortage of raw
	materials, in particular lithium-ion cells, could harm our
	business.
	 
	We may experience increases in the cost or a sustained interruption
	in the supply or shortage of raw materials. Any such increase or
	supply interruption could materially negatively impact our
	business, prospects, financial condition and operating results. We
	use various raw materials in our business including aluminum,
	steel, carbon fiber, non-ferrous metals such as copper and cobalt.
	The prices for these raw materials fluctuate depending on market
	conditions and global demand for these materials and could
	adversely affect our business and operating results. For instance,
	we are exposed to multiple risks relating to price fluctuations for
	lithium-ion cells. These risks include:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	the
	inability or unwillingness of current battery manufacturers to
	build or operate battery cell manufacturing plants to supply the
	numbers of lithium-ion cells required to support the growth of the
	electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle industry as demand for such
	cells increases;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	disruption in the
	supply of cells due to quality issues or recalls by the battery
	cell manufacturers; and
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	an
	increase in the cost of raw materials, such as cobalt, used in
	lithium-ion cells.
 | 
 
	 
	Our business depends on the continued supply of battery cells for
	our vehicles. We do not currently have any agreements for the
	supply of batteries and depend upon the open market for their
	procurement. Any disruption in the supply of battery cells from our
	supplier could temporarily disrupt the planned production of our
	vehicles until such time as a different supplier is fully
	qualified. Moreover, battery cell manufacturers may choose to
	refuse to supply electric vehicle manufacturers to the extent they
	determine that the vehicles are not sufficiently safe. Furthermore,
	current fluctuations or shortages in petroleum and other economic
	conditions may cause us to experience significant increases in
	freight charges and raw material costs. Substantial increases in
	the prices for our raw materials would increase our operating
	costs, and could reduce our margins if we cannot recoup the
	increased costs through increased electric vehicle prices. We might
	not be able to recoup increasing costs of raw materials by
	increasing vehicle prices. We have also already announced an
	estimated price for the base model of our planned SOLO, Super SOLO
	and Tofino. However, any attempts to increase the announced or
	expected prices in response to increased raw material costs could
	be viewed negatively by our potential customers, result in
	cancellations of SOLO, Super SOLO and Tofino reservations and could
	materially adversely affect our brand, image, business, prospects
	and operating results.
	 
	9
	 
	 
	 
	The unavailability, reduction or elimination of government and
	economic incentives could have a material adverse effect on our
	business, financial condition, operating results and
	prospects.
	 
	Any reduction, elimination or discriminatory application of
	government subsidies and economic incentives because of policy
	changes, the reduced need for such subsidies and incentives due to
	the perceived success of the electric vehicle, fiscal tightening or
	other reasons may result in the diminished competitiveness of the
	alternative fuel vehicle industry generally or our electric
	vehicles in particular. This could materially and adversely affect
	the growth of the alternative fuel automobile markets and our
	business, prospects, financial condition and operating
	results.
	 
	If we fail to manage future growth effectively, we may not be able
	to market and sell our vehicles successfully.
	 
	Any failure to manage our growth effectively could materially and
	adversely affect our business, prospects, operating results and
	financial condition. We plan to expand our operations in the near
	future in connection with the planned production of our vehicles.
	Our future operating results depend to a large extent on our
	ability to manage this expansion and growth successfully. Risks
	that we face in undertaking this expansion include:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	training new
	personnel;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	forecasting
	production and revenue;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	controlling
	expenses and investments in anticipation of expanded
	operations;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	establishing or
	expanding design, manufacturing, sales and service
	facilities;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	implementing and
	enhancing administrative infrastructure, systems and
	processes;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	addressing new
	markets; and
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	establishing
	international operations.
 | 
 
	 
	We intend to continue to hire a number of additional personnel,
	including design and manufacturing personnel and service
	technicians for our electric vehicles. Competition for individuals
	with experience designing, manufacturing and servicing electric
	vehicles is intense, and we may not be able to attract, assimilate,
	train or retain additional highly qualified personnel in the
	future. The failure to attract, integrate, train, motivate and
	retain these additional employees could seriously harm our business
	and prospects.
	 
	Our business may be adversely affected by labor and union
	activities.
	 
	Although none of our employees are currently represented by a labor
	union, it is common throughout the automobile industry generally
	for many employees at automobile companies to belong to a union,
	which can result in higher employee costs and increased risk of
	work stoppages. We have a manufacturing agreement with Chongqing
	Zongshen Automobile Co., Ltd. to produce 75,000 SOLO vehicles over
	the next three years. Zongshen’s workforce is not currently
	unionized, though they may become so in the future or industrial
	stoppages could occur in the absence of a union. We also directly
	and indirectly depend upon other companies with unionized work
	forces, such as parts suppliers and trucking and freight companies,
	and work stoppages or strikes organized by such unions could have a
	material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or
	operating results. If a work stoppage occurs within our business,
	that of Zongshen or that of our key suppliers, it could delay the
	manufacture and sale of our electric vehicles and have a material
	adverse effect on our business, prospects, operating results or
	financial condition. Additionally, if we expand our business to
	include full in-house manufacturing of our vehicles, our employees
	might join or form a labor union and we may be required to become a
	union signatory.
	 
	We may become subject to product liability claims, which could harm
	our financial condition and liquidity if we are not able to
	successfully defend or insure against such claims.
	 
	We may become subject to product liability claims, which could harm
	our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition.
	The automobile industry experiences significant product liability
	claims and we face inherent risk of exposure to claims in the event
	our vehicles do not perform as expected or malfunction resulting in
	personal injury or death. Our risks in this area are particularly
	pronounced given we have limited field experience of our vehicles.
	A successful product liability claim against us could require us to
	pay a substantial monetary award. Moreover, a product liability
	claim could generate substantial negative publicity about our
	vehicles and business and inhibit or prevent commercialization of
	other future vehicle candidates which would have material adverse
	effect on our brand, business, prospects and operating results. We
	plan to maintain product liability insurance for all our vehicles
	with annual limits of approximately $5 million on a claims-made
	basis, but any such insurance might not be sufficient to cover all
	potential product liability claims. Any lawsuit seeking significant
	monetary damages either in excess of our coverage, or outside of
	our coverage, may have a material adverse effect on our reputation,
	business and financial condition. We may not be able to secure
	additional product liability insurance coverage on commercially
	acceptable terms or at reasonable costs when needed, particularly
	if we do face liability for our products and are forced to make a
	claim under our policy.
	 
	10
	 
	 
	 
	Our patent applications may not result in issued patents, which may
	have a material adverse effect on our ability to prevent others
	from interfering with our commercialization of our
	products.
	 
	The status of patents involves complex legal and factual questions
	and the breadth and effectiveness of patented claims is uncertain.
	We cannot be certain that we are the first creator of inventions
	covered by pending patent applications or the first to file patent
	applications on these inventions, nor can we be certain that our
	pending patent applications will result in issued patents or that
	any of our issued patents will afford sufficient protection against
	someone creating a knockoff of our products, or as a defensive
	portfolio against a competitor who claims that we are infringing
	its patents. In addition, patent applications filed in foreign
	countries are subject to laws, rules and procedures that differ
	from those of the United States, and thus we cannot be certain that
	foreign patent applications, if any, will result in issued patents
	in those foreign jurisdictions or that such patents can be
	effectively enforced, even if they relate to patents issued in the
	U.S. In addition, others may obtain patents that we need to take a
	license to or design around, either of which would increase costs
	and may adversely affect our business, prospects, financial
	condition and operating results.
	 
	We may need to defend ourselves against patent or trademark
	infringement claims, which may be time-consuming and would cause us
	to incur substantial costs.
	 
	Companies, organizations or individuals, including our competitors,
	may hold or obtain patents, trademarks or other proprietary rights
	that would prevent, limit or interfere with our ability to make,
	use, develop, sell or market our vehicles or components, which
	could make it more difficult for us to operate our business. From
	time to time, we may receive communications from holders of patents
	or trademarks regarding their proprietary rights. Companies holding
	patents or other intellectual property rights may bring suits
	alleging infringement of such rights or otherwise assert their
	rights and urge us to take licenses. In addition, if we are
	determined to have infringed upon a third party’s
	intellectual property rights, we may be required to do one or more
	of the following:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	cease
	selling, incorporating certain components into, or using vehicles
	or offering goods or services that incorporate or use the
	challenged intellectual property;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	pay
	substantial damages;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	seek a
	license from the holder of the infringed intellectual property
	right, which license may not be available on reasonable terms or at
	all;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	redesign our
	vehicles or other goods or services; or
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	establish and
	maintain alternative branding for our products and
	services.
 | 
 
	 
	In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us and
	our failure or inability to obtain a license to the infringed
	technology or other intellectual property right, our business,
	prospects, operating results and financial condition could be
	materially adversely affected. In addition, any litigation or
	claims, whether or not valid, could result in substantial costs,
	negative publicity and diversion of resources and management
	attention.
	 
	You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your
	ability to protect your rights through the U.S. federal courts may
	be limited because we are incorporated under the laws of the
	Province of British Columbia, a substantial portion of our assets
	are in Canada and all of our directors and executive officers
	reside outside the United States
	 
	We are organized under the laws of the 
	Business Corporations
	Act
	 (British Columbia)
	(the “Business Corporation Act”) and our executive
	offices are located outside of the United States in Vancouver,
	British Columbia. All of our officers, our auditor and all but one
	of our directors reside outside the United States. In addition, a
	substantial portion of their assets and our assets are located
	outside of the United States. As a result, you may have difficulty
	serving legal process within the United States upon us or any of
	these persons. You may also have difficulty enforcing, both in and
	outside of the United States, judgments you may obtain in U.S.
	courts against us or these persons in any action, including actions
	based upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. Federal or state
	securities laws. Furthermore, there is substantial doubt as to the
	enforceability in Canada against us or against any of our
	directors, officers and the expert named in this prospectus who are
	not residents of the United States, in original actions or in
	actions for enforcement of judgments of U.S. courts, of liabilities
	based solely upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S.
	federal securities laws. In addition, shareholders in British
	Columbia companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder
	derivative action in U.S. federal courts.
	 
	As a result, our public shareholders may have more difficulty in
	protecting their interests through actions against us, our
	management, our directors or our major shareholders than would
	shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction in the
	United States.
	 
	11
	 
	 
	 
	Risks Related to Our Common Shares
	 
	Our executive officers and directors beneficially own 70.8% of our
	common shares.
	 
	Our executive officers and directors beneficially own, in the
	aggregate, 70.8% of our common shares, which includes shares that
	our executive officers and directors have the right to acquire
	pursuant to warrants and stock options which have vested. As a
	result, they will be able to exercise a significant level of
	control over all matters requiring shareholder approval, including
	the election of directors, amendments to our Articles and approval
	of significant corporate transactions. This control could have the
	effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our company
	or changes in management and will make the approval of certain
	transactions difficult or impossible without the support of these
	shareholders.
	 
	The continued sale of our equity securities will dilute the
	ownership percentage of our existing stockholders and may decrease
	the market price for our common shares.
	 
	Our Notice of Articles authorize the issuance of an unlimited
	number of
	common
	shares and the
	issuance of preferred shares. The Board of Directors has the
	authority to issue additional shares of our capital stock to
	provide additional financing in the future and designate the rights
	of the preferred shares, which may include voting, dividend,
	distribution or other rights that are preferential to those held by
	the common shareholders. The issuance of any such common or
	preferred shares may result in a reduction of the book value or
	market price, if one exists at the time, of the outstanding common
	shares. Given our lack of revenues, we will likely have to issue
	additional equity securities to obtain working capital we require
	for the next 12 months. Our efforts to fund our intended business
	plans will therefore result in dilution to our existing
	stockholders. If we do issue any such additional common shares,
	such issuance also will cause a reduction in the proportionate
	ownership and voting power of all other stockholders. As a result
	of such dilution, if you acquire common shares, your proportionate
	ownership interest and voting power could be decreased. Further,
	any such issuances could result in a change of control or a
	reduction in the market price for our common
	shares.
	 
	Additionally, we have approximately 35,244,271 vested options and
	23,713,716 warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2017. The
	exercise price of the majority of these options and warrants is
	significantly below our current market price. If the holders of
	these options and warrants elect to exercise them, your ownership
	position will be diluted as may be the per share value at which you
	purchased our shares. As a result, the market value of our shares
	could significantly decrease as well.
	 
	Issuances of our preferred stock may adversely affect the rights of
	the holders of our common shares and reduce the value of our common
	shares.
	 
	Our Notice of Articles authorize the issuance of an unlimited
	number of shares of preferred stock. Our Board of Directors has the
	authority to create one or more series of preferred stock and,
	without shareholder approval, issue shares of preferred stock with
	rights superior to the rights of the holders of
	common
	shares. As a result, shares of
	preferred stock could be issued quickly and easily, adversely
	affecting the rights of holder of
	common
	shares and could be issued with terms calculated
	to delay or prevent a change in control or make removal of
	management more difficult. Although we currently have no plans to
	create any series of preferred stock and have no present plans to
	issue any shares of preferred stock, any creation and issuance of
	preferred stock in the future could adversely affect the rights of
	the holders of common shares and reduce the value of our common
	shares.
	 
	The market price of our common shares may be volatile and may
	fluctuate in a way that is disproportionate to our operating
	performance.
	 
	Our
	common
	shares began trading
	on the OTCQB in September 2017. The volume of trading has been low
	and the share price has fluctuated significantly. Although we have
	applied to list our common shares on the Nasdaq Capital Market,
	such listing might not be approved or, if approved, affect the
	volume or price volatility of our common shares. The value of your
	investment could decline due to the impact of any of the following
	factors upon the market price of our common
	shares:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	sales
	or potential sales of substantial amounts of our common
	shares;
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	  
 | 
	●
 | 
	 
 | 
	announcements
	about us or about our competitors;
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	  
 | 
	●
 | 
	 
 | 
	litigation
	and other developments relating to our patents or other proprietary
	rights or those of our competitors;
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	  
 | 
	●
 | 
	 
 | 
	conditions
	in the
	automobile
	 
	industry;
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	  
 | 
	●
 | 
	 
 | 
	governmental
	regulation and legislation;
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	  
 | 
	●
 | 
	 
 | 
	variations
	in our anticipated or actual operating results;
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	  
 | 
	●
 | 
	 
 | 
	change
	in securities analysts’ estimates of our performance, or our
	failure to meet analysts’ expectations;
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	 
 | 
	change
	in general economic trends; and
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	 
 | 
	investor
	perception of our industry or our prospects.
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	Many of these factors are beyond our control. The stock markets in
	general, and the market for
	automobile
	companies in
	particular, have historically experienced extreme price and volume
	fluctuations. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or
	disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies.
	These broad market and industry factors could reduce the market
	price of our common shares, regardless of our actual operating
	performance.
	 
	12
	 
	 
	 
	We do not intend to pay dividends and there will thus be fewer ways
	in which you are able to make a gain on your
	investment.
	 
	We have never paid any cash or stock dividends and we do not intend
	to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future. To the extent that
	we require additional funding currently not provided for in our
	financing plan, our funding sources may prohibit the payment of any
	dividends. Because we do not intend to declare dividends, any gain
	on your investment will need to result from an appreciation in the
	price of our common shares. There will therefore be fewer ways in
	which you are able to make a gain on your investment.
	 
	Because the SEC imposes additional sales practice requirements on
	brokers who deal in securities that are deemed penny stocks, some
	brokers may be unwilling to trade our securities. This means that
	you may have difficulty reselling your shares, which may cause the
	value of your investment to decline.
	 
	Our shares are classified as penny stocks and are covered by
	section 15(g) of the Exchange Act, which imposes additional sales
	practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell our securities in
	the aftermarket. For sales of our securities, broker-dealers must
	make a special suitability determination and receive a written
	agreement from you prior to making a sale on your behalf. Because
	of the imposition of the foregoing additional sales practices, it
	is possible that broker-dealers will not want to make a market in
	our shares. This could prevent you from reselling your shares and
	may cause the value of your investment to decline.
	 
	FINRA sales practice requirements may limit your ability to buy and
	sell our common shares, which could depress the price of our
	shares.
	 
	FINRA rules require broker-dealers to have reasonable grounds for
	believing that an investment is suitable for a customer before
	recommending that investment to the customer. Prior to recommending
	speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional
	customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain
	information about the customer’s financial status, tax status
	and investment objectives, among other things. Under
	interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high
	probability such speculative low-priced securities will not be
	suitable for at least some customers. Thus, FINRA requirements may
	make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their
	customers buy our common shares, which may limit your ability to
	buy and sell our shares, have an adverse effect on the market for
	our shares and, thereby, depress their market prices.
	 
	You may face significant restrictions on the resale of your shares
	due to state “blue sky” laws.
	 
	Each state has its own securities laws, often called “blue
	sky” laws, which: (1) limit sales of securities to a
	state’s residents unless the securities are registered in
	that state or qualify for an exemption from registration; and (2)
	govern the reporting requirements for broker-dealers doing business
	directly or indirectly in the state. Before a security is sold in a
	state, there must be a registration in place to cover the
	transaction, or it must be exempt from registration. The applicable
	broker must also be registered in that state.
	 
	We do not know whether our securities will be registered or exempt
	from registration under the laws of any state. A determination
	regarding registration will be made by the broker-dealers, if any,
	who agree to serve as market makers for our common shares. There
	may be significant state blue sky law restrictions on the ability
	of investors to sell, and on purchasers to buy, our securities. You
	should therefore consider the resale market for our common shares
	to be limited, as you may be unable to resell your shares without
	the significant expense of state registration or
	qualification.
	 
	Our common shares are thinly traded, and you may be unable to sell
	at or near ask prices or at all if you need to sell your shares to
	raise money or otherwise desire to liquidate your
	shares.
	 
	 
	Our common shares are currently quoted on the OTC Market Group
	Inc.’s Venture Market (the “OTCQB”) under the
	symbol “ECCTF”. In the first three months of 2018, our
	average daily trading volume was approximately 1,670 shares.
	Although we have applied to list our shares on the Nasdaq Capital
	Market, we might not be approved and, even if approved, our common
	shares may continue to be “thinly-traded” after that
	listing, meaning that the number of persons interested in
	purchasing our common shares at or near bid prices at any given
	time may be relatively small or non-existent. This situation may be
	attributable to a number of factors, including that we are
	relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional
	investors and others in the investment community that generate or
	influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention
	of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and might be reluctant
	to follow an unproven company such as ours or purchase or recommend
	the purchase of our shares until such time as we became more
	seasoned.  As a consequence, there may be periods of
	several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal
	or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large
	and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support
	continuous sales without an adverse effect on share
	price.  Broad or active public trading market for our
	common shares may not develop or be sustained. 
	 
	Volatility in our common shares or warrant price may subject us to
	securities litigation.
	 
	The market for our common shares may have, when compared to
	seasoned issuers, significant price volatility, and we expect that
	our share or warrant price may continue to be more volatile than
	that of a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. In the past,
	plaintiffs have often initiated securities class action litigation
	against a company following periods of volatility in the market
	price of its securities. We may, in the future, be the target of
	similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in
	substantial costs and liabilities and could divert
	management’s attention and resources. 
	 
	13
	 
	 
	 
	 
	We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules
	under the Exchange Act, and as such we are exempt from certain
	provisions applicable to United States domestic public
	companies.
	 
	 
	 
	We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules
	under the Exchange Act. As such, we are exempt from certain
	provisions applicable to United States domestic public companies.
	For example:
	 
	●
	we
	are not required to provide as many Exchange Act reports, or as
	frequently, as a domestic public company;
 
 
	●
	for
	interim reporting, we are permitted to comply solely with our home
	country requirements, which are less rigorous than the rules that
	apply to domestic public companies;
 
 
	●
	we
	are not required to provide the same level of disclosure on certain
	issues, such as executive compensation;
 
 
	●
	we
	are exempt from provisions of Regulation FD aimed at preventing
	issuers from making selective disclosures of material
	information;
 
 
	●
	we
	are not required to comply with the sections of the Exchange Act
	regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations
	in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act;
	and
 
 
	●
	we
	are not required to comply with Section 16 of the Exchange Act
	requiring insiders to file public reports of their share ownership
	and trading activities and establishing insider liability for
	profits realized from any “short-swing” trading
	transaction.
 
 
	 
	Our shareholders may not have access to certain information they
	may deem important and are accustomed to receive from US reporting
	companies. 
	 
	As an “emerging growth company” under applicable law,
	we will be subject to lessened disclosure requirements. Such
	reduced disclosure may make our common shares less attractive
	to investors.
	 
	For as long as we remain an “emerging growth company”,
	as defined in the JOBS Act, we will elect to take advantage of
	certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are
	applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging
	growth companies”, including, but not limited to, not being
	required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of
	Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure
	obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic
	reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements
	of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation
	and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not
	previously approved.  Because of these lessened
	regulatory requirements, our shareholders would be left without
	information or rights available to shareholders of more mature
	companies. If some investors find our common shares less attractive
	as a result, there may be a less active trading market for such
	securities and their market prices may be more
	volatile. 
	 
	We incur significant costs as a result of being a public company,
	which costs will grow after we cease to qualify as an
	“emerging growth company.”
	 
	We incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses as a
	public company that we did not incur as a private company. The
	Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently
	implemented by the SEC and NASDAQ Capital Market, impose various
	requirements on the corporate governance practices of public
	companies. We are an “emerging growth company,” as
	defined in the JOBS Act and will remain an emerging growth company
	until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a)
	following May 23, 2022, (b) in which we have total annual gross
	revenue of at least $1.07 billion, or (c) in which we are deemed to
	be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our
	common shares that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million
	as of the prior June 30th, and (2) the date on which we have issued
	more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior
	three-year period.  An emerging growth company may take
	advantage of specified reduced reporting and other requirements
	that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These
	provisions include exemption from the auditor attestation
	requirement under Section 404 in the assessment of the
	emerging growth company’s internal control over financial
	reporting and permission to delay adopting new or revised
	accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to
	private companies.
	 
	Compliance with these rules and regulations increases our legal and
	financial compliance costs and makes some corporate activities more
	time-consuming and costly. After we are no longer an emerging
	growth company, we expect to incur significant expenses and devote
	substantial management effort toward ensuring compliance with the
	requirements of Section 404 and the other rules and
	regulations of the SEC. For example, as a public company, we have
	been required to increase the number of independent directors and
	adopt policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls
	and procedures. We have incurred additional costs in obtaining
	director and officer liability insurance. In addition, we incur
	additional costs associated with our public company reporting
	requirements. It may also be more difficult for us to find
	qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as
	executive officers. We are currently evaluating and monitoring
	developments with respect to these rules and regulations, and we
	cannot predict or estimate with any degree of certainty the amount
	of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such
	costs.
	 
	14
	 
	 
	 
	 
	ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
	 
	Summary
	 
	We were
	incorporated on February 16, 2015 under the laws of British
	Columbia, Canada, and have a December 31, fiscal year end. We are
	engaged in the planning, development and manufacturing of single
	person electric vehicles.
	 
	Our
	principal executive offices are located at 102 East 1
	st
	 Avenue,
	Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5T 1A4. Our telephone number
	is (604) 428-7656. Our website address is www.electrameccanica.com.
	Information on our website does not constitute part of this Annual
	Report. Our registered and records office is located at Suite 1500,
	1055 West Georgia Street, P.O. Box 11117, Vancouver, British
	Columbia, Canada, V6E 4N7.
	 
	A. 
	History and
	development of the Company
	 
	Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp. is a development-stage electric
	vehicle (“EV”) production company incorporated on
	February 16, 2015 under the laws of British Columbia, Canada. The
	concept for our company was developed by Jerry Kroll after years of
	research and development on advanced EVs.
	 
	Upon returning to Vancouver in 2011, Mr. Kroll decided that new
	electric drive systems could revolutionize car assembly and the
	concept for our company’s flagship EV called the
	“SOLO” was born. With the help of long time automotive
	expert and friend, Henry Reisner, President of Intermeccanica
	International Inc. (“Intermeccanica”), and
	Intermeccanica’s vast experience in automotive craftsmanship,
	our company’s first prototype was finished in January 2015.
	To solidify our presence and branding in the EV market, we
	incorporated in February of 2015 under the name Electrameccanica
	Vehicles Corp. For the past 10 years, Mr. Kroll has been
	researching and developing technologies for autonomous drive
	systems and dynamic induction charging. We have plans for ongoing
	refinements to performance, style, value and efficiency as drive
	systems, computerization and materials are developed.
	 
	In 2015, we entered into an arrangement with Intermeccanica to
	leverage Intermeccanica’s over 50 years of experience.
	Pursuant to a Joint Operating Agreement entered into between us,
	Intermeccanica and Mr. Reisner, dated July 15, 2015, and as amended
	on September 19, 2016, we agreed on an arrangement dealing with
	leased premises, production assembly and an option to acquire
	Intermeccanica. We exercised this option in October 2017 to further
	enhance the combination of our proprietary SOLO design with
	Intermeccanica’s manufacturing expertise.
	 
	We currently have a modern furnished showroom near the downtown
	core of Vancouver, British Columbia where interested consumers may
	receive more information on the SOLO, review its specs and
	technical design, and even test-drive one of the existing
	prototypes.
	 
	As of
	April 6,
	2018, we have a
	number of marketing efforts that have succeeded in helping us
	achieve a non-binding order book of approximately $2.4 billion,
	including 824 private and 59,900 corporate pre-sales. Interested
	individuals are able to place reservations for the SOLO and the
	Tofino with a refundable deposit of $250 and $1,000 respectively.
	We have private orders for 700 SOLOs, each with a refundable
	deposit of $250, 14 Super SOLOs; each with a refundable deposit of
	$1,000 and 110 Tofinos, each with a refundable deposit of $1,000.
	The 59,900 corporate orders are from entities that have provided
	non-binding letters of interest and are comprised of 20,330 orders
	for the SOLO and 39,570 orders for the Tofino.
	 
	We have been funding operations to date through equity financings
	by our founders and through private placements of
	$
	25,165,436
	from investors. Our
	management maintains a majority control of our company. As
	our
	April 11,
	2018, our
	directors and executive officers beneficially owned 70.8% of our
	outstanding shares, including shares that our executive officers
	and directors have the right to acquire within the next 60 days
	pursuant to warrants and stock options which have
	vested.
	 
	Our principal executive offices are located at 102 East
	1st Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5T 1A4. Our
	phone number is (604) 428-7656.
	 
	15
	 
	 
	 
	 
	B. 
	Business
	Overview
	 
	General
	 
	We are a development-stage EV company focusing on the market demand
	for EVs that are efficient, cost-effective and environmentally
	friendly methods for urban residents to commute. We believe that
	our flagship EV called the SOLO is the answer to such market
	demand. In addition, we have two other EV candidates in an advanced
	stage of development, the Super SOLO and the Tofino.
	 
	SOLO
	 
	 
	We created the SOLO’s first prototype in January of 2015.
	Since the completion of the prototype, our engineers and designers
	have devoted efforts to provide the SOLO with an appealing design,
	and have engaged in proprietary research and development leading to
	a high performance electric rear drive motor.
	 
	The SOLO features a lightweight aerospace composite chassis to
	allow for a top speed of 130km/h, an attainable cruise speed of
	110km/h and is able to go from 0 km/h to 100 km/h in approximately
	eight seconds. Our SOLO features a lithium ion battery system that
	requires only three hours of charging time on a 220-volt charging
	station or six hours from a 110-volt outlet. The lithium battery
	system utilizes approximately 8.64 kW/h for up to 160 km in range.
	We also offer a comprehensive warranty package for two years of
	unlimited mileage which is included in the price of the SOLO.
	Standard equipment in the SOLO includes, but is not limited to the
	following:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	LCD
	Digital Instrument Cluster;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Power
	Windows;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	AM/FM
	stereo with Bluetooth/ CD/USB;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Remote
	keyless entry system;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Rear
	view backup camera;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	285
	liters of cargo space; and
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Heater
	and defogger.
 | 
 
	 
	Optional equipment will include air conditioning at an additional
	cost.
	 
	The purchase price for our SOLO is $19,888.
	 
	Our production department has completed twenty five pre-production
	SOLOs as of April 6, 2018, and we intend to produce up to six
	further pre-production SOLOs by the end of June 30, 2018. Producing
	the pre-production SOLOs allows us to determine and assess the
	entire production process. Currently, we have increased our
	production space, organized a production line, ordered components
	and are in the process of fine tuning the production process
	through the pre-production SOLOs. We have entered into a
	manufacturing agreement with Zongshen and expect to begin mass
	production of the SOLO in the third quarter of 2018. We anticipate
	our production costs to be $15,000 per SOLO, providing a gross
	margin of 25% based on a sale price of $19,888.
	 
	16
	 
	 
	 
	Super Solo
	 
	 
	 
	We also plan on launching the Super SOLO, which is a sports car
	model within our EV product line. The Super SOLO is intended to
	boast a longer range and a higher top speed, sleek, aerodynamic
	design and features that will rival existing super sports cars such
	as the Ferrari 488 and Lamborghini Gallardo.
	 
	Refundable deposits have been accepted for the planned Super SOLO
	and such deposits are able to be returned at any time. Mechanical
	development on the Super SOLO has begun and progress will determine
	when this and any other variants can be launched. No set date has
	been declared at this time. The Super SOLO is intended to be a
	high-performance version of the SOLO.
	 
	The Tofino
	 
	 
	We announced on March 28, 2017, at the Vancouver International Auto
	Show that we intend to build the Tofino, an all-electric,
	two-seater roadster representing an evolution of the Intermeccanica
	Roadster. We are designing the Tofino to be equipped with a
	high-performance, all-electric motor with a top speed of 200 kph
	(125 mph) and a 0-100 kph (0-60 mph) in less than seven seconds.
	The chassis and body are expected to be made of a lightweight
	aerospace-grade composite with the car expected to be capable of up
	to 400 km (250 miles) of range on a full charge. We are accepting a
	refundable deposit of $1,000 to reserve the Tofino.
	 
	17
	 
	 
	 
	Future EV candidates
	 
	We have identified other vehicles that we would like to add to our
	candidate list such as the “Cargo” and the
	“Twinn”, although no timeline has been set for their
	development and production. We have plans in the future to release
	the “Cargo,” a larger vehicle than the SOLO that is
	designed for use as a fleet vehicle with ample storage space which
	would be best suited for delivery companies such as FedEx, the
	United States Postal Service and Canada Post. We expect that the
	Cargo will offer the appropriate compartment space for fleet
	vehicle uses such as delivery, while offering long range capability
	and cleaner technology. We envision the Twinn featuring two seats,
	suitable for urban families, young commuters, empty nesters, and
	environmentally-conscious consumers.
	 
	Sources and Availability of Raw Materials
	 
	We continue to source duplicate suppliers for all of our
	components, and in particular, we are currently sourcing our
	lithium batteries from Panasonic, Samsung and LT Chem. Lithium is
	subject to commodity price volatility which is not under our
	control and could have a significant impact on the price of lithium
	batteries.
	 
	At present, we are subject to the supply of our chassis from one
	supplier for the production of the SOLO, the Super SOLO and the
	Tofino. We are exploring adding additional suppliers of the chassis
	to mitigate the risk of depending on only one
	supplier.
	 
	Patents and Licenses
	 
	We have filed patents on items that our legal counsel deem
	necessary to protect our products. We do not rely on any licenses
	from third-party vendors at this time.
	 
	Our success depends, at least in part, on our ability to protect
	our core technology and intellectual property. To accomplish this,
	we rely on a combination of patent and design applications, trade
	secrets, including know-how, employee and third party
	non-disclosure agreements, copyright laws, trademarks and other
	contractual rights to establish and protect our proprietary rights
	in our technology. As at
	April 11,
	2018, we had one issued design registration, two
	allowed design application and six pending patent and design
	applications with various countries which we consider core to our
	business in a broad range of areas related to the design of the
	SOLO and its powertrain. We intend to continue to file additional
	patent applications with respect to our technology. We do not know
	whether any of our pending patent applications will result in the
	issuance of patents or whether the examination process will require
	us to narrow our claims. Even if granted, these pending patent
	applications might not provide us with adequate
	protection.
	 
	Trademarks
	 
	We operate under the trademark “ELECTRA MECCANICA
	SOLO”, which is registered under applicable intellectual
	property laws. We have also registered the trademark for the name
	“Tofino” in Japan and applied to register the trademark
	in Canada, the United States, the European Union and China. This
	prospectus contains references to our trademarks and service marks
	and to those belonging to other entities. Solely for convenience,
	trademarks and trade names referred to in this prospectus may
	appear without the ® or TM symbols, but
	such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we
	will not assert, to the fullest extent possible under applicable
	law, our rights or the rights of the applicable licensor to these
	trademarks and trade names. We do not intend our use or display of
	other companies’ trade names, trademarks or service marks to
	imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by,
	any other companies.
	 
	Market Overview
	 
	Investment in clean technology has been trending for several years
	as nations, governments, and society overall become more aware of
	the damaging effects pollution and greenhouse gas emissions
	(“GHG”) have on the environment. In an attempt to
	prevent and/or slow-down these damaging effects and create a more
	sustainable environment, nations and government agencies have
	announced their proposals to reduce GHGs, contribute funding into
	research and development in clean technology, and offer
	incentives/rebates for clean technology investments by businesses
	and consumers.
	 
	Electric vehicle (“EV”) is a broad term for vehicles
	that do not solely operate on gas or diesel. Within this
	alternative vehicle group, there are more categories that further
	segment into alternative vehicles that embrace different innovative
	technologies such as: (i) battery electric vehicles
	(“BEV”); (ii) fuel-cell electric vehicles
	(“FCV”); or (iii) plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
	(“PHEV”).
	 
	18
	 
	 
	 
	BEVs draw on power from battery management systems to power
	electric motors instead of from an internal combustion engine, a
	fuel cell, or a fuel tank. The Nissan Leaf, Tesla Model S, and our
	SOLO are BEVs.
	 
	FCVs typically utilize a hydrogen fuel cell that, along with oxygen
	from the air, converts chemical energy into electricity which
	powers the vehicle’s motor. Emissions from a FCV are water
	and heat, hence making FCVs true zero-emission vehicles.
	The
	Honda Clarity, Hyundai Tucson and
	Toyota Mirai are FCVs.
	 
	PHEVs are the hybrid vehicles that have both an electric motor and
	an internal combustion engine. A PHEV can alternate between using
	electricity while in its all-electric range and relying on its
	gas-powered engine. The Chevrolet Volt and the Toyota Prius are
	examples of PHEVs.
	 
	The popularity of EVs have also been met with difficulties in
	charging convenience. There are far more gas stations available
	than public EV charging stations: a search on Yellow Pages reveals
	that there are 439 gas stations alone in the City of Vancouver
	whereas the entire Province of British Columbia has approximately
	500 public EV charging stations. The convenience and availability
	of public EV charging stations may prove to be an obstacle of mass
	adoption of EVs.
	 
	Consumers may be afraid that their EVs may run out of charge while
	they are out on the road and this fear is recognized by the public
	and has been popularized with the term “range anxiety”.
	Despite this fear, the distance travelled by most urban commuters
	is a lot lower than the typical range of an EV. Data from
	Statistics Canada’s National Household Survey in 2011
	reported the average Canadian takes 25 minutes to commute to
	work.
	 
	There currently exists different categories of charging stations
	depending on the voltage they provide. EV owners can often charge
	at home on a regular 110-volt outlet which may take between 10
	hours to 20 hours depending on the model and make of the EV. This
	type of outlet and charging is termed level 1 charging. Level 2
	charging means the voltage at the charging station is typically
	around 240 volts and this type of outlet is usually available at
	public charging stations, shopping malls and big box retailer
	parking lots, and even located in certain residential hi-rises.
	Charging at a level 2 station typically cuts down the level 1
	charge time in half and may require a small fee for the service
	which may vary depending on the provider and the
	location.
	 
	Electric Vehicles/Automotive – Global Market
	 
	EVs have been around for a number of years, but have only recently
	gained mass adoption and public interest due to open discussions of
	GHG emission levels, government and international policies on
	climate change and pollution, increased literature on EVs,
	fluctuating fuel costs, and improved battery management systems and
	EV range. According to Navigant Research, the global light duty EV
	market is estimated to grow from 2.6 million vehicle sales in 2015
	to over 6.0 million vehicle sales in 2024.
	 
	EVs in the global market are gaining adoption by the general public
	and these efforts have also been aided by traditional automotive
	manufacturers’ entry into the market. The majority of growth
	in the EV industry has been led by the following top five EV
	models: (1) Nissan Leaf; (2) Chevrolet Volt (PHEV); (3) Toyota
	Prius (PHEV); (4) Tesla Model S; and, (5) Mitsubishi Outlander
	(PHEV). There are few manufacturers that are solely devoted to
	the manufacturing of EVs, the most well-known and popular one being
	Tesla Motors.
	 
	On a global scale, EVs are gaining popularity, particularly in
	countries where there is high population density, narrow roads, and
	limited urban space. According to an April 2016 article from
	Pedestrian Observations, an online website dedicated to
	transit-oriented developments, several European countries are
	formulating programs that ban cars fueled by petrol or diesel. This
	initiative was introduced by Norway’s Minister for the
	Environment and co-spokesperson for the Green Party, which expects
	to implement the ban completely by 2025.
	 
	In France, the Paris region has been calling for a phase-out of the
	internal combustion engine due to rising levels of particulate
	pollution from diesel vehicles and the local government is looking
	into implement more battery charging stations to help commuters
	refuel along the way. The German government is expecting
	German automakers to spend more money on research and development
	for improved battery range and charging stations.
	 
	In Belgium, Switzerland, and the Netherlands, such governments
	would like a similar phase-out program akin to that of
	Norway’s. These countries expect the phase-out to be
	complete by 2030. In some of these countries, however, there
	remain opposing parties to the phase-out program and it is
	uncertain as to how it will ultimately play out.
	 
	We believe that the aforementioned initiatives show that there is
	significant demand for EVs and with government support, adoption of
	EVs and changes to the industry can be made more rapidly. Our
	management believes that these initiatives will materialize and are
	optimistic at the prospects of an overall cleaner environment and
	bigger market for EVs.
	 
	19
	 
	 
	 
	Electric Vehicles/Automotive – Canadian Market
	 
	Data from FleetCarma.com (“FleetCarma”), a clean
	technology information and communications technology website,
	reported 2015 EV sales in Canada to be 6,933. Although this
	number pales in comparison to the total 1.898 million internal
	combustion vehicles sold in Canada in 2015, the 2015 EV sales
	numbers represent an approximate 32% increase in sales over 2014.
	The graph below from FleetCarma further breaks down the number of
	vehicles sold by each EV automaker in Canada in 2014 and
	2015.
	 
	As can be seen from the graph above, Tesla Motor’s Model S
	made huge strides in sales, recording a 137% increase in 2015 over
	2014. Nissan Leaf sales also increased by 23% in 2015 while
	Chevrolet Volt sales were down 8% in 2015 as compared to the
	previous year.
	 
	FleetCarma also states the total number of EVs on the road in
	Canada at 18,451. 54% of Canada’s total EVs are BEVs
	with the rest being PHEVs. FleetCarma’s data also highlights
	that the Province of Quebec currently leads the rest of Canada with
	the most registered EVs at 8,500 vehicles, representing 46% of the
	entire Canadian EV population. The bar chart below from FleetCarma
	indicates the provinces and their respective number of registered
	EVs as at December 31, 2015.
	 
	20
	 
	 
	 
	Data from British Columbia Air Quality, a government division
	focused on transportation emissions, indicates that pollutant
	emissions from conventional gasoline vehicles produce almost five
	times as much volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”) than
	gasoline/electric hybrid vehicles.
	 
	 
	* NOx refers to Nitrogen Oxides | PM2.5refers to particles in
	air pollutants that are 2.5 micrometers or less in
	size
	 
	Data from Environment and Climate Change Canada indicates that
	Canada is one of the top countries with large ratios of emissions
	to GDP. Canada has been working towards reducing its air pollutant
	emissions alongside other member countries of the Organisation for
	Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”). As can
	be seen in the bar chart and table below, Canada’s nitrogen
	levels in 2014 were reduced by 23.3% from 2004 levels.
	 
	 
	 
| 
	Countries
 | 
	2004 nitrogen oxide emissions
 
	(kilotonnes)
 | 
	2014 nitrogen oxide emissions
 
	(kilotonnes)
 | 
	2004 nitrogen oxide emissions intensity (tonnes per million US
	dollars of gross domestic product)
 | 
	2014 nitrogen oxide emissions intensity (tonnes per million US
	dollars of gross domestic product)
 | 
| 
	United States
 | 
	19,248
 | 
	11,092
 | 
	1.38
 | 
	0.69
 | 
| 
	Canada
 | 
	2,506
 | 
	1,923
 | 
	2.01
 | 
	1.28
 | 
 
	 
	21
	 
	 
	 
	The below bar chart and table also illustrates the 23.6% decrease
	in VOC emissions in 2014 from 2004 levels. The table compares
	Canada’s VOC emission levels with that of the United
	States.
	 
	 
	 
| 
	Countries
 | 
	2004 VOC emissions 
 
	(kilotonnes)
 | 
	2014 VOC emissions 
 
	(kilotonnes)
 | 
	2004 VOC emissions intensity (tonnes per million US dollars of
	gross domestic product)
 | 
	2014 VOC emissions intensity (tonnes per million US dollars of
	gross domestic product)
 | 
| 
	United States
 | 
	14,787
 | 
	12,917
 | 
	1.06
 | 
	0.80
 | 
| 
	Canada
 | 
	2,823
 | 
	2,157
 | 
	2.26
 | 
	1.44
 | 
 
	 
	The above presented data also points out opportunities for EV
	markets in countries that have difficulties reducing the air
	pollution. From the bar charts above, it appears that Australia,
	Turkey and the United Kingdom will also be ideal markets for EVs
	which allow for substantial reduction in VOC and
	NOXemissions.
	 
	A February 2016 article from the Globe and Mail provides more
	insights on the expected levels of emissions in the coming years.
	According to the article, in 2020, emissions will hit 768 megatons
	of carbon dioxide – way above Canada’s target of 622
	megatons. By 2030, they will have jumped to 815 megatons, compared
	with a target for that year of 524 megatons. As a result,
	provincial governments in Canada are carefully monitoring GHG
	emissions and providing funding and incentives to help reduce these
	emission levels.
	 
	Another reason EVs have become popular is due to variable fuel
	costs and vehicle maintenance costs that have become a burden for
	conventional gasoline automobile owners. According to the American
	Automobile Association, the owner of an average sedan would incur
	US$8,876 a year in driving costs and an average cost per mile of
	US$0.592 cents (US$0.367 cents per km). In comparison to the
	above statistic, an October 2015 Globe and Mail article reports
	electric vehicles typically cost owners $0.016 per km to
	drive.
	 
	Canada is seen as a leader in many industries, but clean-tech and
	EVs seems not to be one of them. However, research and data reveals
	significant interest in EVs from Canadians. According to a 2015
	study completed by Ipsos, a market research firm, 80% of Canadians
	believe electric cars are the way of the future and 75% would like
	to drive a car not powered by gasoline.
	 
	Normally, it is difficult for innovative breakthrough technology to
	be rapidly adopted by the mass public unless they are well-educated
	on the technology and the technology is affordable and sufficiently
	promoted via incentives from the government. In the case of Canada,
	government incentives and initiatives allow for affordable EVs and
	convenient free or low-cost charging stations, further promoting
	the benefits of clean-tech to the general public. Below is an
	overview of current and prospective provincial government
	incentives that encourage consumers to embrace EVs. As Ontario,
	Quebec and British Columbia are the top three most populous
	provinces in Canada, the overview will focus on these
	provinces.
	 
	22
	 
	 
	 
	In Ontario, 35% of GHGs are created from transportation
	emissions. In an effort to reduce GHGS, the Province of
	Ontario has established government rebates for consumers purchasing
	EVs. The government of Ontario has plans to allocate $325 million
	for investments in green technology, a portion of it will be
	devoted to EV programs.
	 
	The Province of British Columbia has allotted $7.5 million funding
	for the Clean Energy Vehicle Program (the “CEVforBC
	Program”) which provides a $5,000 rebate to consumers of a
	qualifying battery electric, fuel-cell electric, or plug-in hybrid
	electric vehicle. The SOLO qualifies for such funding. A
	further $1.59 million in funding will be invested by the Province
	of British Columbia into charging infrastructure and hydrogen
	fueling infrastructure.
	 
	In British Columbia, there are over 500 public electric vehicle
	charging stations to allow for convenient charging. The City of
	Vancouver alone boasts over 90 public electric charging stations.
	According to the City of Vancouver website, the municipality now
	has the biggest municipal EV fleet in Canada, consisting of 26
	Mitsubishi iMiEVS and one Nissan Leaf.
	 
	British Columbia is not the only province in Canada offering
	incentives for EVs. According to a February 2016 article from CBC
	News, the Province of Ontario has announced, effective as of
	February 10, 2016, a boost to its incentives from the current range
	of $5,000 to $8
	,500 per vehicle up to $6,000 to $10,000 for
	the purchase or lease of eligible plug-in EVs. Additional
	incentives are available for EVs with larger battery capacity or a
	five-seater vehicle. CBC News reports there are currently 5,800 EVs
	in Ontario alone.
	 
	According
	to a CBC News article in December 2015, the Ontario government is
	expected to allot $20 million in grants to encourage public and
	private sector partners to construct a network of public EV
	charging stations which will be available in cities, offices,
	residential high-rises, and along commuter highways. The EV
	rebates, along with the EV charging station network, are expected
	to help reduce Ontario
	GHGs by 80% of
	1990 levels by the year 2050.
	 
	The Province of Quebec announced plans to allocate $420 million to
	promote EVs over the five years between 2015 to 2020. Denis
	Coderre, the former Mayor of Montreal expected the city to have a
	total of 1,000 charging stations by 2020. Curbside charging
	stations will allow EV owners easier access compared to current
	charging stations that are often located in underground parking
	lots. The proposed charging stations will primarily be level 2
	chargers (which have 240 volts and typically 16 to 30 amps), with
	approximately six stations being level 3 chargers (which can
	provide up to 80% of a full charge in 30 minutes). Costs of
	utilizing the stations are $1 per hour for the level 2 stations
	(parking costs extra) and $10 per hour for level 3
	stations.
	 
	Manufacturing Plan
	 
	As of
	April 11
	, 2018, we have
	built 25 pre-production vehicles. We have used some of these
	pre-production vehicles as prototypes, have delivered four to
	customers upon payment of the purchase price, and have used others
	as test drive models in our two showrooms. At our facilities
	located in British Colombia, we can manufacture approximately two
	to four vehicles per month. Our ability to build EVs at our own
	facilities has been enhanced by our recent acquisition of
	Intermeccanica which has over 50 years of custom car manufacturing
	expertise.
	Intermeccanica commenced operations during 1959
	in Turin, Italy selling speed equipment kits. This led to the
	production of a Formula Junior racer and eventually to the first
	unique bodied, hand assembled road car called the InterMeccanica
	Puch or IMP (21). The car competed at the Nurburgring, a 13.75 mile
	race circuit in Germany, where it won its 500 cc class. The success
	of the IMP led Intermeccanica to build the Apollo (101), Griffith
	(14), Italia (500) and Indra (125) during the period 1959 to 1975.
	Thereafter, Intermeccanica moved to North America where it started
	to construct the Porsche 356 Speedster replica and later
	Intermeccanica moved to Vancouver, Canada, where it developed the
	tooling to produce the Roadster RS based on the 1959 Porsche 356 D,
	Intermeccanica incorporated its own tubular chassis in 1986 and
	offered various powertrains from the original VW air-cooled engine
	to a six-cylinder engine from a Porsche 911. Intermeccanica,
	throughout its operating history, has built approximately 2,500
	vehicles.
	 
	To enable us to mass produce our EVs, we have entered into a
	manufacturing agreement with Zongshen located in Chongqing, China.
	Under the agreement, Zongshen has begun the process of establishing
	tooling and has contracted to produce 75,000 SOLO vehicles.
	Zongshen, through its subsidiary, Chongqing Zongshen Engine
	Manufacturing Co., Ltd. is a subsidiary of Zongshen Power. Since
	its establishment in 1992, Zongshen Power has grown into a
	large-scale scientific and technical enterprise capable of
	researching, developing, manufacturing and selling a diverse range
	of motorcycles and motorcycle engines in China. Its products
	include over 130 models of two-wheeled motorcycles, electric
	motorcycles, three-wheeled motorcycles, cross-country vehicles and
	ATVs with motors ranging from 35CC to 500CC. Zongshen Power has
	been an industry leader for many successive years. Zongshen has
	purchased $1,017,532 of our common shares from us and beneficially
	owns approximately 11.1% of our common shares. If we complete this
	offering, we expect to begin placing orders with Zongshen in the
	first or second quarter of 2018 and to begin sales of SOLOs in
	August 2018. We anticipate that Zongshen will produce up to 5,000
	of our cars in 2018, 20,000 of our cars in 2019 and 50,000 of our
	cars in 2020.
	 
	23
	 
	 
	 
	Marketing Plan
	 
	We recognize that marketing efforts must be focused on customer
	education and establishing brand presence and visibility which is
	expected to allow our vehicles to gain traction and subsequently
	gain increases in orders. Marketing and promotional efforts must
	emphasize the SOLO’s image as an efficient, clean, and
	affordable EV for the masses to commute on a daily basis. If we can
	successfully promote the SOLO on these points, we expect growth in
	sales and customer base to occur rapidly.
	 
	A key point to the marketing plan is to target metropolitan cities
	with high population density, expensive real estate, high commuter
	traffic load, and pollution levels which are becoming an enormous
	concern. Accordingly, our management has identified cities in
	Canada and the United States that fit the aforementioned criteria
	and have plans to seek out suitable locations in the following
	cities for additional showrooms in the second and third quarters of
	2018: Toronto; Seattle; Los Angeles; San Francisco; and
	Manhattan.
	 
	Key aspects of our marketing plan are highlighted below. We plan to
	develop a marketing strategy that will generate interest and media
	buzz based on the SOLO’s selling points.
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Organic
	engagement on social media with engaging posts aimed to educate the
	public about EVs and develop interest in our SOLO, which to date
	has had positive traction.
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Earned
	media – we have already received press coverage from several
	traditional media sources and expect these features and news
	stories to continue as we embark on our commercial
	launch.
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Investor Relations/
	Press Releases – our in-house investor relations team will
	provide media releases/kits for updates and news on our
	progress.
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Industry shows and
	events – we displayed the SOLO at the Vancouver International
	Autoshow in March 2017 and at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las
	Vegas in January 2018. Promotional merchandise giveaways will
	enhance and further solidify our branding in consumer minds.
	Computer stations and payment processing software will be readily
	on hand at to accept SOLO reservations.
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	First-hand
	experience - Test-drives and public viewings are available at our
	existing showrooms in and near the Vancouver downtown
	core.
 | 
 
	 
	We anticipate that our marketing strategy and tactics will evolve
	over time as our SOLO gains momentum and we identify appropriate
	channels and media that align with our long-term objectives. In all
	of our efforts, we plan to focus on the features that differentiate
	our SOLO from the existing EVs on the market.
	 
	Reservation System
	 
	We have an online reservation system which allows a potential
	customer to reserve a SOLO by paying a refundable $250 deposit, a
	Super SOLO by paying a refundable $1,000 deposit and a Tofino by
	paying a refundable $1,000 deposit. Once reserved, the potential
	customer is allocated a reservation number and the reservation will
	be fulfilled as the respective vehicles are produced. As of
	April 11,
	2018, we have received
	deposits for 700 SOLOs, 14 Super SOLOs and 110 Tofinos. In
	addition, we have received non-binding letters of intent for 59,900
	vehicles from corporate entities that are not required to make a
	deposit.
	 
	We will earn revenue once a vehicle has been delivered to the
	customer who has pre-ordered their vehicle. Each order is placed in
	line as received and fulfilled once the vehicle becomes available.
	The customer may, at any time, for any reason, cancel their order
	and have their deposit returned. We do not consider any order as
	being secured until the vehicle has been delivered and full receipt
	of the remaining balance of the vehicle purchase price has been
	received.
	 
	Sales and Service Model
	 
	Sales Model
	 
	We sell our vehicles online via our website
	(www.electrameccanica.com), while we develop our planned corporate
	owned dealerships in key markets and franchise dealer network in
	other market areas. As each franchise dealer is established, any
	vehicles sold within such dealers designated territory will be
	delivered to such dealer to fulfill online orders as well as such
	franchise dealer’s orders.
	 
	We are unable to identify where we hope to establish franchise
	dealers as opposed to corporate owned dealerships. The
	establishment of franchise dealers will depend on regional demand,
	available candidates and local regulations. We are currently
	accepting expressions of interest and applications for franchised
	dealerships from individuals, and do not have any franchise or
	dealer agreements. Our vehicles will initially be available
	directly from Electrameccanica.
	 
	We plan to only establish and operate corporate owned dealerships
	in those states in the U.S. that do not restrict or prohibit
	certain retail sales models by vehicle manufacturers. In all other
	instances, we plan to establish franchise dealerships to comply
	with local regulations.
	 
	24
	 
	 
	 
	Service Model
	 
	We plan to have our vehicles serviced through our corporate and
	franchised dealerships.
	 
	Government Regulation
	 
	As a vehicle manufacturer established in Canada, we are required to
	ensure that all vehicle production meets applicable safety and
	environmental standards. Issuance of the National Safety Mark (the
	“NSM”) by the Minister of Transport for Canada will be
	our authorization to manufacture vehicles in Canada. Receipt of the
	NSM is contingent on us demonstrating that our vehicles are
	designed and manufactured to meet or exceed the applicable sections
	of the Canadian Motor Vehicle Safety Act (C.R.C. Chapter 1038) and
	that appropriate records are maintained. Unique to Canada, the SOLO
	and the Super SOLO are under the three-wheeled vehicle category and
	are subject to the safety standards listed in Schedule III of the
	Canadian Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations (“CMVSR”),
	which can be found at (
	http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/C.R.C.,
	_c._
	1038/section-sched3.html
	).
	For sale into the United States, we and our vehicles must meet the
	applicable parts of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations
	(“CFR”) Title 49 - Transportation. This includes
	providing Manufacture Identification information (49 CFR Part 566),
	VIN-deciphering information (49 CFR Part 565), and certifying that
	our vehicles meet or exceeds the applicable sections of the Federal
	Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (40 CFR Part 571) and Environmental
	Protection Agency noise emission standards (40 CFR 205). Since the
	U.S. regulations do not have a specific class for three-wheeled
	‘autocycles’, the SOLO and the Super SOLO fall under
	the definition of a motorcycle pursuant to Sec. 571.3 of 49 CFR
	Part 571.
	 
	We obtained U.S. compliance certification for the SOLO in the first
	quarter of 2018 at a testing facility in Quebec, Canada. Compliance
	certification of the SOLO for Canada began in 2018, and we
	estimate, depending on the weather and results, that it will be
	complete in the second quarter of 2018.
	 
	Within the three wheel vehicle classification in Canada, CMVSR
	Standard 305 sets out the regulation for prevention of injury to
	the occupant during and after a crash as related to the
	vehicle’s batteries. Under this standard, the security and
	integrity of electric drive system components and their isolation
	from the occupant are evaluated in the course of a frontal barrier
	crash test in accordance with Technical Standard Document No. 305.
	There is no such regulation applicable to the motorcycle category
	under the U.S. regulations.
	 
	Although the SOLO and the Super SOLO fall under the definition of a
	motorcycle under U.S. regulations, a motorcycle license is not
	required to drive them in all but two U.S. states.
	 
	Competition
	 
	The worldwide automotive market, particularly for alternative fuel
	vehicles, is highly competitive today and we expect it will become
	even more so in the future as we move towards production of the
	SOLO, the Super SOLO and the Tofino and the introduction of other
	models such as the anticipated “Twinn” and the
	“Cargo.” Other manufacturers have entered the electric
	vehicle market and we expect additional competitors to enter this
	market within the next several years. As they do, we expect that we
	will experience significant competition. With respect to the SOLO,
	we also face strong competition from established automobile
	manufacturers, including manufacturers of EVs, such as the Tesla
	Model S, the Chevrolet Volt and the Nissan Leaf.
	 
	A matrix of our SOLO compared to the top three selling EVs in
	Canada is presented below (note: in the below matrix, each vehicle
	may be available in different models, and only the lowest
	model’s specs and prices are quoted in the matrix), which
	information is readily available from each manufacturer’s
	website. Information in the below matrix analyzes key
	considerations of a potential purchaser of an EV.
	 
	 
	 
	25
	 
	 
	 
	We believe the primary competitive factors in our market include
	but are not limited to:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	technological
	innovation;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	product
	quality and safety;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	service
	options;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	product
	performance;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	design
	and styling;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	brand
	perception;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	product
	price; and
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	manufacturing
	efficiency.
 | 
 
	 
	Most of our current and potential competitors have significantly
	greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing and other
	resources than we do and may be able to devote greater resources to
	the design, development, manufacturing, distribution, promotion,
	sale and support of their products. Virtually all of our
	competitors have more extensive customer bases and broader customer
	and industry relationships than we do. In addition, almost all of
	these companies have longer operating histories and greater name
	recognition than we do. Our competitors may be in a stronger
	position to respond quickly to new technologies and may be able to
	design, develop, market and sell their products more
	effectively.
	 
	Furthermore, certain large manufacturers offer financing and
	leasing options on their vehicles and also have the ability to
	market vehicles at a substantial discount, provided that the
	vehicles are financed through their affiliated financing company.
	We do not currently offer any form of direct financing on our
	vehicles. The lack of our direct financing options and the absence
	of customary vehicle discounts could put us at a competitive
	disadvantage.
	 
	We expect competition in our industry to intensify in the future in
	light of increased demand for alternative fuel vehicles, continuing
	globalization and consolidation in the worldwide automotive
	industry. Our ability to successfully compete in our industry will
	be fundamental to our future success in the EV market and our
	market share. We might not be able to compete successfully in our
	market. If our competitors introduce new cars or services that
	compete with or surpass the quality, price or performance of our
	vehicles or services, we may be unable to satisfy existing
	customers or attract new customers at the prices and levels that
	would allow us to generate attractive rates of return on our
	investment. Increased competition could result in price reductions
	and revenue shortfalls, loss of customers and loss of market share,
	which could harm our business, prospects, financial condition and
	operating results.
	 
	Research and Development
	 
	We have allocated substantial resources in developing our first
	vehicles. We expended $4,430,386 during the fiscal year ended
	December 31, 2017 and $2,778,295 during the fiscal year ended
	December 31, 2016 on research and development costs which include
	labor and materials.
	 
	Employees
	 
	As of
	April 11,
	2018, we
	employed a total of 44 full-time and
	no
	part-time people at our principal executive
	offices in Vancouver, British Columbia. None of our employees are
	covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
	 
	The breakdown of employees by main category of activity is as
	follows:
	 
| 
	Activity
 |  | 
| 
	Engineering/R&D
 | 
	 
	 
	29
	 
 | 
| 
	Sales &
	Marketing
 | 
	 
	 
	4
	 
 | 
| 
	General &
	Administration
 | 
	 
	 
	5
	 
 | 
| 
	Executives
 | 
	 
	 
	6
	 
 | 
 
	 
	26
	 
	 
	 
	Legal Proceedings
	 
	We are not involved in, or aware of, any legal or administrative
	proceedings contemplated or threatened by any governmental
	authority or any other party. As of the date of this prospectus, no
	director, officer or affiliate is a party adverse to us in any
	legal proceeding, or has an adverse interest to us in any legal
	proceeding.
	Intermeccanica Business
	 
	In
	October 2017, we acquired Intermeccanica. In addition to the
	manufacturing and design experience that the acquisition provided
	us, we acquired a business of custom car manufacturing.
	Intermeccanica, throughout its operating history, has built
	approximately 2,500 vehicles, and in in the year ended December 31,
	2017, Intermeccanica sold eight vehicles. We intend to continue the
	legacy business of Intermeccanica, but we do not envision that it
	will be central our operations, represent a material portion of our
	revenue if we develop our business as planned or account for a
	material portion of our expenses.
	 
	C. 
	Organizational
	structure
	 
	We have one subsidiary, Intermeccanica International Inc., a
	corporation subsisting under the laws of the Province of British
	Columbia, Canada.
	 
	D. 
	Property, plant
	and equipment
	 
	Our principal office is located at 102 East 1st Avenue,
	Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5T 1A4. On July 25, 2015, we
	together with Intermeccanica as tenants entered into a light
	industrial lease agreement with Cressey (Quebec Street) Development
	LLP (the “Landlord”) for the premises located at 102
	East 1st Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia. The lease
	agreement is for a term of five years which commenced on November
	1, 2015, with a monthly minimum rent of $3,918.86 plus additional
	rent, which includes operating costs, property taxes, utilities and
	a management fee of 4% of the minimum rent for the particular lease
	year. The leased premises is 7,235 sq. ft. in size and we are not
	allowed to assign the lease or grant a sublease of the whole or any
	part of the leased premises without the written consent of the
	Landlord.
	 
	Currently, our development and manufacturing facility is located at
	47 Braid Street, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada and is
	capable of producing four to ten SOLOs per month. Our existing
	production facilities are being used to build four pre-production
	SOLOS and for the development of the Super SOLO, and they are
	adequate for production of the low volume required for the Super
	SOLO. We together with Intermeccanica as tenants entered into a
	lease agreement with Astron Realty Group Inc. for Unit 47, which
	commenced on August 1, 2016 and expires on July 31, 2020. Unit 47
	is approximately 7,270 sq. ft. and the minimum rent per month is
	$3,938 until July 31, 2017 and $4,089 from August 1, 2017 to July
	31, 2020, and we are responsible for all associated lease costs
	such as strata fees, property taxes, utility fees and other charges
	associated with the occupancy of such premises. Our management has
	met with several groups to discuss the possibility of a production
	facility located in Canada and internationally.
	 
	Ideally, the new production facility will be 50,000 to 200,000
	square feet, which will allow our company to produce 25,000 to
	50,000 SOLOs per year. We have also consulted a process design
	company, which will form a suitable manufacturing flow production
	process and facility layout for our anticipated 10 production lines
	that will maximize labor and equipment usage and minimize
	manufacturing and assembly time. Our management estimates the full
	assembly of a SOLO in the new production facility will take
	approximately four hours. An example of the layout of the new
	production facility is presented below. We estimate that the cost
	of the machinery to equip a new production facility will range from
	$10 million to $15 million for the assembly of vehicles. Experts in
	the field of designing and equipping a manufacturing facility
	presented to us that a facility of 50,000 to 200,000 square feet
	will be able to produce between 25,000 to 50,000 vehicles per year.
	The level of automation will determine if the equipment cost will
	be on the lower-end of the range ($10 million) for a semi-automated
	facility, to the upper-end of the range ($15 million) for a fully
	automated facility. While it is difficult to forecast any sales, we
	believe that there are enough expressions of interest to satisfy
	the production capabilities of the above mentioned facility.
	However, we do not anticipate building a new production facility
	until sometime in 2018 or later if the demand for the SOLO
	materializes.
	 
 
 
	 
	27
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
	 
	 
	General
	 
	This report should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
	financial statements and related notes. The discussion and analysis
	of the financial condition and results of operations are based upon
	the financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
	with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as adopted
	by the International Accounting Standards Board
	(IASB).
	 
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with these
	accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions
	that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
	disclosure of contingent liabilities at the financial statement
	date and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
	reporting period. On an on-going basis, we review our estimates and
	assumptions. The estimates were based on historical experience and
	other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
	circumstances. Actual results are likely to differ from those
	estimates or other forward-looking statements under different
	assumptions or conditions, but we do not believe such differences
	will materially affect our financial position or results of
	operations. Our actual results may differ materially as a result of
	many factors, including those set forth under the headings entitled
	“
	Forward-Looking
	Statements
	” and
	“
	Risk
	Factors
	”.
	 
	Critical accounting policies, the policies we believe are most
	important to the presentation of our financial statements and
	require the most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, are
	outlined below under the heading “
	Critical Accounting Policies
	and Estimates”
	, and have
	not changed significantly since our founding.
	 
	Overview
	 
	ElectraMeccanica
	Vehicles Corp., (the “Company”) was incorporated on
	February 16, 2015, under the laws of the province of British
	Columbia, Canada, and our principal activity is the development and
	manufacturing of single occupancy electric vehicles. Our head
	office and principal address is located at 102 East 1st Avenue,
	Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5T 1A4.
	 
	Going Concern
	 
	The accompanying financial statements have been prepared under the
	assumption that our company will continue as a going concern. We
	are a development stage company and have incurred losses since our
	inception. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, we
	have had minimal revenues and have incurred a net loss and
	comprehensive loss of $11,366,372 during the year ended December
	31, 2017 and have a cash balance and a working capital surplus of
	$8,610,996 and $6,653,009, respectively, as at December 31, 2017.
	We raised $3,177402 subsequent to December 31, 2017, which may not
	be sufficient to enable us to operate for the next 12 months and
	execute our business plan.
	 
	Our ability to meet our obligations as they fall due and to
	continue to operate as a going concern depends on the continued
	financial support of our creditors and our shareholders. In the
	past, we have relied on sales of our equity securities to meet our
	cash requirements. Funding from this or other sources might not be
	sufficient in the future to continue our operations. Even if we are
	able to obtain new financing, it may not be on commercially
	reasonable terms or terms that are acceptable to us. Failure to
	obtain such financing on a timely basis could cause us to reduce or
	terminate our operations. The above indicates the existence of a
	material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on our ability
	to continue as a going concern.
	 
	The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
	be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. If
	the going concern basis was not appropriate for these financial
	statements, adjustments would be necessary in the carrying value of
	assets and liabilities, the reported expenses and the balance sheet
	classifications used.
	 
	As at
	December 31, 2017, we had not commenced commercial production, and
	we are currently unable to finance day-to-day activities through
	operations. Our continuation as a going concern depends upon the
	successful results from our electric vehicles manufacturing
	activities and our ability to attain profitable operations and
	generate funds there from and/or raise equity capital or borrowings
	sufficient to meet current and future obligations. These factors
	indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast
	significant doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
	Management intends to finance its operations over the next twelve
	months through the proceeds derived from this offering. Should we
	be unable to continue as a going concern, the net realizable value
	of our assets may be materially less than the amounts on our
	statement of financial position.
	 
	28
	 
	 
	 
	 
	A. 
	Operating
	Results
	 
	Results of Operations for the Year ended December 31, 2017 as
	Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2016
	 
	Revenues
	 
	Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $109,173 (2016:
	$nil). Our revenue was derived by the sale of one roadster by
	Intermeccanica during the period from acquisition to December 31,
	2017. As Intermeccanica was our sole source of revenue and we
	acquired Intermeccanica in October 2017, we had no revenue prior to
	October 2017.
	Operating Expenses
	 
	We incurred costs and expenses in the amount of $9,534,379 for the
	fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, an increase from costs and
	expenses of $8,942,022 for the period ended December 31,
	2016.
	 
	This increase in incurred costs and expenses is primarily
	attributable to the collective results of the following
	factors:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	General
	and administrative expenses for year ended December 31, 2017 were
	$2,373,251 compared to $1,205,835 for the period ended December 31,
	2016. The following items are included in general and
	administrative expenses:
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	-
 | 
	Rent,
	which increased to $269,716 for the year ended December 2017 from
	$141,957 for the period ended December 31, 2016. The increase was
	caused by the increase in our production premises as we expand our
	production capabilities to produce the SOLO, an increase in our
	retail presence and the addition of rental space on the acquisition
	of Intermeccanica;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	-
 | 
	Office
	expenses, which increased to $345,986 for the year ended December
	31, 2017 from $113,158 for the period ended December 31, 2016. The
	increase was caused by travel costs to China and New York, an
	increase in directors and officers liability insurance as we
	migrated from a private company in 2016 to a public company in 2017
	and a donation of our first SOLO vehicle to Loving Spoonful, a
	non-profit organization;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	-
 | 
	Legal
	& Professional expenses, which increased to $912,347 for the
	year ended December 31, 2017 from $643,725 for the period ended
	December 31, 2016. The majority of the legal expenses was due to
	the filing of our application for a ticker symbol to the Financial
	Industry Regulation Authority (FINRA) in the United States of
	America, other legal costs associated with contracts, together with
	professional fees associated with the filing of our amended F1
	registration statement, the purchase of Intermeccanica, and fees
	related to the filing and receiving of our Scientific, Research and
	Experimental Development (SRED) claim;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	-
 | 
	Consulting fees,
	which increased to $405,176 for the year ended December 31, 2017
	from $186,437 for the period ended December 31, 2016. Consulting
	fees relate to services provided for accounting, finance and
	corporate advisory services. The increase in fees related to the
	use of additional consultants for investor relations and executive
	advisory services; and
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	-
 | 
	Salaries &
	Employees related expenses, which increased to $326,770 for the
	year ended December 31, 2017, from $120,558 for the corresponding
	year ended December 31, 2016. Increases relate to the addition of
	new employees and the addition of employees related to the
	acquisition of Intermeccanica.
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Research and
	development expenses increased to $4,430,386 for the year ended
	December 31, 2017, from $2,778,295 for the period ended December
	31, 2016 primarily as a result of an increase in the costs of
	materials to $2,763,355 from $1,266,730 over the two periods. We
	continue to develop our first electric vehicles. All costs related
	to pre-production vehicles are being expensed to research and
	development. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company
	received $193,534 (2016: $203,997) in government grants related to
	the Industrial Research Assistance Program (“IRAP)
	administered by the National Research Council. In addition, the
	Company received $111,380 (2016: $nil), in Scientific Research and
	Experimental Development (“SRED”) grant..
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Sales
	and marketing expenses increased to $631,381 for the year ended
	December 31, 2017 from $209,455 for the period ended December 31,
	2015. We have
	 
	increased our sales and
	marketing efforts by opening retail stores, increasing our social
	media presence and increasing our staff as our first electric
	vehicle, the SOLO, nears production.
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Stock-based
	compensation charges for the year ended December 31, 2017 were
	$889,511 (2016: $1,461,189). We issued 1,120,000 stock options at
	an exercise price of $1.00 per share during the year ended December
	31, 2017. In addition, the stock-based compensation charges relate
	to stock options issued during previous quarters where charges are
	recognized over the stock option vesting period. We use the
	Black-Scholes method of calculating the stock-based compensation
	expense under the graded method.
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Share-based payment
	expense
	 
	decreased to $1,085,716
	for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to $3,264,681 for
	the corresponding year ended December 31, 2016. During the year
	ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 45,045 warrants to a
	consultant to provide marketing services which were fair valued at
	$274,407 and shares provided for corporate advisory services were
	fair valued and resulted in a non-cash amount of
	$811,309.
 | 
 
	 
	29
	 
	 
	 
	Other Items
	 
	We incurred an interest accretion expense of $69,562 for the year
	ended December 31, 2017 (2015: $25,908) relating to a convertible
	loan (note 11 in the financial statements for the year ended
	December 31, 2017). We valued our finder’s fee related to the
	convertible loan at $258,542 (2016: $nil).
	 
	We incurred changes in fair values of warrant derivative of
	$186,269 (2016: $Nil), caused by warrants priced in US dollars,
	while our functional currency is in Canadian dollars. As a result
	of this difference in currencies, the proceeds that will be
	received by us are not fixed and will vary based on foreign
	exchange rates and the warrants are a derivative under IFRS, and
	are required to be recognized and measured at fair value at each
	reporting period. Any changes in fair value from period to period
	are recorded as non-cash gain or loss in the consolidated statement
	of net loss and comprehensive loss.
	 
	We impaired our goodwill arising from the acquisition of
	Intermeccanica, after a third-party valuation report was
	commissioned to value the acquisition and apportion the purchase
	price to the net assets of Intermeccanica, which amounted to
	$1,342,794 (2016: $nil).
	 
	In addition, other items include a foreign exchange loss of $20,048
	for the year ended December 31, 2017 (2015: $5,417). Some of our
	expenses are paid to suppliers based in the United States who
	invoice us in US dollars.
	 
	Net and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
	 
	As a result of the above factors, we reported a net loss and
	comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 of
	$11,366,372 (2016: $8,973,347).
	 
	B. 
	Liquidity and
	Capital Resources
	 
	Our
	operations consist of the designing, developing and manufacturing
	of electric vehicles. Our financial success depends upon our
	ability to market and sell our electric vehicles; and to raise
	sufficient working capital to enable us to execute our business
	plan. Our historical capital needs have been met by the sale of
	common shares. Equity funding might not be possible at the times
	required by us. If no funds are can be raised and sales of our
	electric vehicles do not produce sufficient net cash flow, then we
	may require a significant curtailing of operations to ensure our
	survival.
	 
	The
	financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis
	which assumes that we will be able to realize our assets and
	discharge our liabilities in the normal course of business for the
	foreseeable future. We incurred a net loss and comprehensive loss
	of $11,366,372 during the year ended December 31, 2017 and had a
	cash balance and a working capital surplus of $8,610,996 and
	$6,653,009, respectively, as at December 31, 2017. Our ability to
	meet our obligations as they fall due and to continue to operate as
	a going concern depends on the continued financial support of the
	creditors and the shareholders. In the past, we have relied on
	sales of our equity securities to meet our cash requirements.
	Funding from this or other sources might not be sufficient in the
	future to continue our operations. Even if we are able to obtain
	new financing, it may not be on commercially reasonable terms or
	terms that are acceptable to us. Failure to obtain such financing
	on a timely basis could cause us to reduce or terminate our
	operations. The above indicates the existence of a material
	uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on our ability to
	continue as a going concern.
	 
	As of
	December 31, 2017, we had 47,588,209 issued and outstanding shares
	and 128,504,425 shares on a fully-diluted basis. We began trading
	on the over the counter market on September 1, 2017.
	 
	We had
	$6,653,009 of working capital surplus as at December 31, 2017
	compared to $3,555,976 of working capital surplus as at December
	31, 2016. The increase in working capital surplus resulted from
	cash used in operations of $7,320,080 (2016: $4,162,835); cash used
	in investing activities of $2,104,816 (2016: $357,372) resulting
	from the additions to property, plant and equipment and the
	purchase of Intermeccanica; which was offset by financing
	activities generating cash of $14,119,609 (2016: $8,330,133) due to
	the issuance of 3,820,499 common shares for net cash proceeds of
	$10,837,902 (2016: $8,063,633); net proceeds from the issuance of a
	convertible loan of $2,441,191 (2016: $300,000); and proceeds
	received in fiscal 2017 from share subscriptions of $750,000 (2016:
	$101,500) for shares that were issued in 2018.
	 
	As at
	December 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $8,610,996
	(2016: $3,464,108).
	 
	As of
	December 31, 2017, we had no outstanding commitments, other than
	rent and lease commitments and $7.8 million payable to our
	manufacturing partner for the production of the SOLO (see note 9 to
	our financial statements for the year ended December 31
	,
	2017). On October
	16, 2017, Jerry Kroll, our President and CEO, entered into a Share
	Pledge Agreement with Zongshen to guarantee our payment for the
	cost of the prototype tooling and molds estimated to be $1.8
	million through the pledge of 800,000 common shares of the Company
	at a deemed price of USD $2.00. Apart from our agreement to
	reimburse Mr. Kroll for liabilities under his Share Pledge
	Agreement, we have not pledged any of our assets as security for
	loans, or otherwise and are not subject to any debt
	covenants.
	 
	30
	 
	 
	 
	As of December 31, 2017, we had total current assets of $10,007,684
	and total current liabilities in the amount of $3,354,675. As a
	result, we had working capital surplus of $6,653,009 as of December
	31, 2017 (2016: $3,555,976).
	 
	Subsequent to December 31, 2017, we issued 1,526,669 common shares
	for proceeds of $3,177,402, net of share issue costs.
	 
	Our monthly burn rate is currently $400,000 per month.
	 
	Cash Used in Operating Activities
	 
	Operating activities used $7,320,080 in cash for the fiscal year
	ended December 31, 2017, compared to $4,162,835 in cash used in
	operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016. Our
	negative cash flow from operating activities for the fiscal year
	ended December 31, 2017 was caused by our being in development
	phase of our overall business plan (which overall business plan
	excludes Intermeccanica’s business), and we do not expect to
	realize any revenues from our overall business plan until the third
	quarter of 2018.
	 
	Cash Used in Investing Activities
	 
	Cash flows used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended
	December 31, 2017 was $2,104,816 compared to $357,372 cash flows
	used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended December 31,
	2016. The increase in cash flows used in investing activities for
	the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, was caused primarily by
	increases in expenditures in equipment to $1,264,265 (2016:
	$232,027) and investment to $900,000 (2015: $100,000).
	 
	Cash flows from Financing Activities
	 
	Cash flows generated from financing activities for the fiscal year
	ended December 31, 2017 were $14,119,609, compared to $8,330,133
	for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. During the fiscal year
	ended December 31, 2017, we repaid a shareholder loan of $33,155
	(2016: $135,000), generated net cash proceeds from the issuance of
	common shares net of share issue costs of $10,837,902 (2016:
	$8,063,633), received $2,441,225 from convertible loans which
	converted to equity (2016: $300,000) and generated proceeds of
	$750,000 from share subscriptions (2016: $101,500).
	 
	C. 
	Research and
	Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
	 
	Research costs are expensed when incurred. Development costs
	including direct material, direct labor and contract service costs
	are capitalized as intangible assets when we can demonstrate that
	the technical feasibility of a project has been established; that
	we intend to complete the asset for use or sale and have the
	ability to do so; that the asset can generate probable future
	economic benefits; that the technical and financial resources are
	available to complete the development; and that we can reliably
	measure the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during
	its development. After initial recognition, internally- generated
	intangible assets are recorded at cost less accumulated
	amortization and accumulated impairment losses. These costs are
	amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life.
	To date, we have not met the criteria to capitalize development
	costs.
	 
	The following table specifies the amounts spent on research and
	development for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and
	2016:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
 
	Fiscal year ended December
	31,
	 
	2017
 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
 
	Fiscal year ended December
	31,
	 
	2016
 
 | 
| 
	Labor
 | 
	 
	$
	1,971,946
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	1,715,562
	 
 | 
| 
	Materials
 | 
	 
	 
	2,763,355
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,266,730
	 
 | 
| 
	Government
	grants
 | 
	 
	 
	(304,914
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(203,997
	)
 | 
| 
	Total
 | 
	 
	$
	4,430,387
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	2,778,295
	 
 | 
 
	 
	31
	 
	 
	 
	 
	D. 
	Trend
	Information
	 
	Due to our short operating history, we are not aware of any trends
	that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future
	effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition,
	revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital
	expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
	However, as of
	April 11,
	2018,
	we had an order backlog of 700 SOLOs, 14 Super SOLOs and 110
	Tofinos.
	 
	E. 
	Off-Balance Sheet
	Arrangements
	 
	As of December 31, 2017, we did not have any off-balance sheet debt
	nor did we have any transactions, arrangements, obligations
	(including contingent obligations) or other relationships with any
	unconsolidated entities or other persons that may have material
	current or future effect on financial conditions, changes in the
	financial conditions, results of operations, liquidity, capital
	expenditures, capital resources, or significant components of
	revenue or expenses.
	 
	F. 
	Tabular Disclosure
	of Contractual Obligations
	 
| 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Contractual
	obligations
 |  |  |  | 
	4-5
	years
 | 
	More than
	 
	5 years
 | 
| 
	Operating Lease
	Obligations
 | 
	 
	$
	817,070
	(1)
 | 
	 
	$
	310,034
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	507,036
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Other Long-Term
	Liabilities Reflected on the Registrant’s Balance Sheet under
	IFRS
 | 
	 
	 
	Nil 
	 
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
	Total
 | 
	 
	$
	817,070
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	310,034
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	507,036
	 
 |  |  | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(1)
 | 
	Office
	and warehouse rent, based on $17,410.68 per month October through
	December 2016; $18,422.62 per month January through December 2017.
	Amounts are estimated due to fluctuations in common area
	maintenance charges.
 | 
 
	 
	G. 
	Safe
	Harbor
	 
	Not
	applicable.
	 
	ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
	 
	A. 
	Directors and
	Senior Management
	 
	Directors and Executive Officers
	 
	The following table sets forth the names and ages of all of our
	directors and executive officers.
	 
| 
	Name, Province/State
	 
	and Country of
	 
	Residence
 |  | 
	Position
 | 
	Director/Officer
	Since
 | 
| 
	Jerry Kroll 
	(1)(2)(3), British
	Columbia, Canada
 | 
	 
	 
	57
	 
 | 
	President, CEO and
	director
 | 
	February 16,
	2015
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	Kulwant Sandher
	(2)(5), British
	Columbia, Canada
 | 
	 
	 
	56
	 
 | 
	Chief Financial
	Officer and Secretary
 | 
	June 15,
	2016
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	Iain Ball
	, British Columbia,
	Canada
 | 
	 
	 
	63
	 
 | 
	Vice-President,
	Finance
 | 
	February 16,
	2015
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	Henry Reisner
	 (2), British
	Columbia, Canada
 | 
	 
	 
	53
	 
 | 
	Chief Operating
	Officer and director
 | 
	February 16,
	2015
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	Ed Theobald
	, British Columbia,
	Canada
 | 
	 
	 
	65
	 
 | 
	General
	Manager
 | 
	February 16,
	2015
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	Shaun
	Greffard 
	(2)(3)(6)(8), British Columbia,
	Canada
 | 
	 
	 
	43
	 
 | 
	Director
 | 
	August 8,
	2016
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	Louisa Ingargiola
	(3)(4)(6)(7)(8),
	Florida, USA
 | 
	 
	 
	50
	 
 | 
	Director
 | 
	March 16,
	2018
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	Steven Sanders
	(4)(6)(7)(8), New York,
	USA
 | 
	 
	 
	72
	 
 | 
	Director
 | 
	March 16,
	2018
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	Robert Tarzwell 
	(2)(3)(4)(6)(7)(8),
	British Columbia, Canada
 | 
	 
	 
	47
	 
 | 
	Director
 | 
	August 8,
	2016
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	Mark West
	 British Columbia,
	Canada
 | 
	 
	 
	50
	 
 | 
	Vice-President,
	Sales & Dealerships
 | 
	November 1,
	2016
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(1)
 | 
	Mr.
	Kroll was appointed President, CEO and a director of the Company
	effective February 16, 2015.
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(2)
 | 
	Member
	of the Social Media Committee.
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(3)
 | 
	Member
	of the Enterprise Risk Oversight Committee.
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(4)
 | 
	Member
	of the Nominating Committee
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(5)
 | 
	Mr.
	Sandher was appointed CFO of the Company on June 15, 2016. Mr.
	Sandher was appointed as Secretary of the Company on August 8,
	2016.
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(6)
 | 
	Member
	of the Corporate Governance and Human Resources
	Committee.
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(7)
 | 
	Member
	of the Compensation Committee
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	32
	 
	 
	 
	Business Experience
	 
	The following summarizes the occupation and business experience
	during the past five years or more for our directors, and executive
	officers as of the date of this prospectus:
	 
	Jerry Kroll – President, Chief Executive Officer and a
	director
	 
	Mr. Kroll has an extensive background working in small businesses
	and start-ups. His career began when he managed the production,
	strategic planning, and sales operations of Kroll Greenhouses, his
	family business. From there, Mr. Kroll served in other management
	roles in the floral and food services industries, overseeing the
	import/export of floral products, managing employees, managing food
	franchises, and establishing supplier/distributor
	relationships.
	 
	In 1996, Mr. Kroll became involved in air racing as the owner of
	Vancouver International Air Races and Airshow, which featured large
	scale events attracting over 15,000 spectators and 31 corporate
	sponsors. From then on, Mr. Kroll became increasingly involved in
	air racing and motor races. He eventually became the president and
	CEO of Corbin Motors Vancouver Inc. in 2001 where he organized the
	sales of the firm’s three-wheeled commuter vehicle in
	Canada.
	 
	In 2007, Mr. Kroll founded KleenSpeed Technologies, a firm focused
	on stationary energy storage products. He began researching and
	developing an EV for the everyday commuter. As an entrepreneur, Mr.
	Kroll also founded Ascend Sportmanagement Inc., a sports property
	and technology management firm.
	 
	Mr. Kroll’s experience and skillset in innovative technology
	and start-ups, coupled with his passion for clean technology
	developments, allows Mr. Kroll to coordinate, manage, and execute
	strategies for our company.
	 
	Mr. Kroll is also actively involved in the Vancouver venture
	capital scene and has been a member of the Vancouver Angel
	Technology Network, an investing and mentoring network for new
	technology start-ups, since 2003.
	 
	Kulwant Sandher, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
	 
	Kulwant Sandher is a Chartered Professional Accountant with over 25
	years of experience in business and finance. Mr. Sandher graduated
	from Queen Mary, University of London (formerly known as Queen Mary
	College) in 1986 with a B.Sc. degree (Eng.) in Avionics. Mr.
	Sandher became a Chartered Accountant in England in 1991 and
	received his Chartered Professional Accountant designation in
	Canada in 1997.
	 
	Mr. Sandher has considerable private and public company experience.
	He served as CFO of MineSense Technologies Inc. from August 2013
	until July 2015; as CFO of Alba Mineral Ltd. from June 2017 to the
	present; as CFO of Delta Oil & Gas from October 2008 to
	September 2017; as CFO of Astorius Resources Ltd. from June 2017 to
	the present; as CFO of Hillcrest Petroleum from December 2011 to
	April 2015; as CFO of Intigold Mines Ltd. from December 2010 to
	April 2017; and as COO & CFO for Marketrend Interactive Inc.,
	from March 2004 to March 2006.
	 
	Mr. Sandher has also served as CFO of several publicly listed
	companies, including: Hillcrest Petroleum (TSX-V), Millrock
	Resources Inc. (TSX-V) and St. Elias Mines (TSX-V). Currently, Mr.
	Sandher serves as President of Hurricane Corporate Services Ltd.
	and as CFO of Alba Resources Ltd. (TSX-V). Furthermore, Mr. Sandher
	is currently serving as a director and CFO of Delta Oil and Gas
	Inc. since 2007 and Director of The Cloud Nine Education Group Inc
	since December 2015.
	 
	Iain Ball, Vice-President, Finance
	 
	Mr. Ball is an experienced financial executive with over 25 years
	of international corporate financial and general management
	experience. He has been providing CFO services, along with
	strategic and financial advice, to growing companies and start-ups
	since 2012, and served as our CFO from June 2015 to June
	2016.
	 
	He is the former Chief Financial Officer and Director of
	Progressive Solutions Inc. (“Progressive Solutions”),
	an enterprise resource planning software company that grew (both
	organically and by acquisition) from 40 employees to 135 employees
	in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Mr. Ball was
	responsible for debt and equity financings that were instrumental
	to Progressive Solutions’ acquisitions and international
	growth. Progressive Solutions was successfully sold to a strategic
	buyer in 2012.
	 
	Mr. Ball graduated from the University of Aberdeen in 1975 with a
	Bachelor of Science (Honours), as well as a Master of Business
	Administration from Simon Fraser University in 1999. He became a
	Chartered Accountant in Scotland in 1979 and obtained his Chartered
	Professional Accountant designation in 1982 from the Canadian
	Institute of Chartered Professional Accountants.
	 
	Henry Reisner, Chief Operating Officer
	 
	Mr. Reisner is the current President of Intermeccanica, a
	subsidiary of our company, which is an automobile manufacturer, and
	has held this position since 2001. He is experienced in the
	automotive industry and has a background in
	manufacturing.
	 
	Mr. Reisner holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science
	from the University of British Columbia in 1989.
	 
	33
	 
	 
	 
	Ed Theobald, General Manager
	 
	Mr. Theobald is a seasoned operational manager with over 40 years
	of experience in finance, industrial sales, construction, retail,
	and oil & gas industries. This experience includes over 20
	years as at Envirotest Canada from when he started in 1995 through
	to his current position as general manager which he has held since
	January 2015. He also oversaw the operations of 16 automotive
	repair shops as Regional Manager of Speedy Glass. Mr, Theobald
	became our General Manager in February 2015.
	 
	Shaun Greffard, Director
	 
	Mr. Greffard is a management professional with over 20 years of
	experience in telecommunications, information technology and
	government. During his career as a management professional, Mr.
	Greffard has been responsible for Ledcor's over $80M Canadian
	telecommunications division and responsible for negotiating
	commercial and contractual terms for the largest P3
	telecommunications deal in North America valued at close to US$600M
	over a three-year Design/Build contract and 30 year Operations
	contract. He was also responsible for negotiating numerous US
	contracts between the public and private sectors, working with and
	for local and federal government entities including delivery of one
	of the largest Canadian telecommunications deals with the Federal
	government. He has been responsible for conducting labor
	negotiations and transforming people, culture and corporate image
	after a prolonged labor dispute and has run the marketing
	organization for a $100M division of Telus. He is adept at
	overhauling under-performing business units and analyzing and
	removing operational flaws to improve operational performance and
	profitability.
	 
	Mr. Greffard accumulated his experience and skill set from roles at
	Telus Communications Inc., the City of Surrey, and Ledcor Group. He
	is currently the Vice President of Strategic Projects at the Ledcor
	Group.
	 
	Mr. Greffard holds a Master’s in Business Administration from
	Royal Roads University.
	 
	Dr. Robert Tarzwell, Director
	 
	Dr. Tarzwell began his career as a psychiatrist at St. Paul’s
	Hospital in 2006. His experience and expertise led him to other
	clinical/consultant roles in medicine and academia, serving as
	external faculty member for Green College of the University of
	British Columbia, medical advisor for virtual healthcare
	application Medeo, and clinical assistant professor in the faculty
	of medicine at the University of British Columbia. Dr. Tarzwell is
	currently Clinical Director of Research for Mental Health at Lions
	Gate Hospital. For over five years, Dr. Tarzwell has run his own
	private medical practice.
	 
	In addition to his background in academia and medicine, Dr.
	Tarzwell is an enthusiast of high tech industries, multimedia
	innovations, and race cars. He is an investor/advisor for a number
	of Vancouver-based start-ups, including Medeo, Hothead Games, EM,
	and Viewers Like You Productions.
	 
	Dr. Tarzwell holds a Bachelor’s Degree in English and
	Literature from Simon Fraser University, a Doctor of Medicine from
	the University of Manitoba, a Psychiatrist certification from the
	Royal College of Physicians of Canada at Dalhousie University, and
	a Nuclear Medicine certification from the Royal College of
	Physicians of Canada at the University of British
	Columbia.
	 
	Louisa Ingargiola
	 
	Ms. Ingargiola has been the Chief Financial Officer of Avalon
	GloboCare, a leading biotech health care company that is developing
	cell based therapeutic technologies for cancer and neuromuscular
	disease. Luisa also serves as a director and audit chair of FTE
	Networks, a leading international network infrastructure solutions
	and cyber security company. Luisa is a former chief financial
	officer and current board member of MagneGas Corporation. In
	addition, she has served as Audit Chair for several public
	companies in the technology, environmental and energy
	industries.
	 
	Steven Sanders
	 
	Since January 2017, Mr. Sanders has been Of Counsel to the law firm
	of Ortoli Rosenstadt LLP. From July 2007 until January 2017, Mr.
	Sanders was a Senior Partner of Ortoli Rosenstadt LLP. From January
	1, 2004 until June 30, 2007, he was of counsel to the law firm of
	Rubin, Bailin, Ortoli, LLP.  From January 1, 2001 to
	December 31, 2003, he was counsel to the law firm of Spitzer &
	Feldman PC.  Mr. Sanders also serves as a Director of
	Helijet International, Inc.  Additionally, he is a
	Director of the Roundabout Theatre (the largest not-for-profit
	theatre in North America), Town Hall New York City, and he is a
	director at Trustee, American Academy of Dramatic Arts. Mr. Sanders
	received his JD from Cornell University and his BBA from The City
	College of New York.
	 
	Mark West, Vice-President, Sales & Dealerships
	 
	Mark West has over 25 years of experience directing and expanding
	operations in the highly competitive food and beverage industry.
	Mr. West was instrumental in the local and international growth of
	Blenz Coffee from 10 stores to over 70 stores in Canada and Asia.
	Mr. West was the President of Blenz Coffee from September 2012 to
	December 2016 and previously held the positions of President,
	Vice-President, Manager of Operations and Manager of Franchising
	from 1996 to 2007. Mr. West was the Vice-President and an owner of
	MyCup Coffee and Tea from 2008 to 2012. Mr. West joined our team in
	November 2016.
	 
	34
	 
	 
	 
	Advisory Board
	 
	We have a full Advisory Board in place, complete with individuals
	who have various backgrounds and experience to complement our
	operations, mission, and business strategy. The Advisory
	Board
	provides suggestions to our management on an as-needed
	basis. The Advisory Board does not have a charter and does not meet
	on a scheduled basis. It is
	comprised
	of the following individuals:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	Name
 | 
	State/province of residence
 | 
	Position
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	John
	Douglas Reynolds
 | 
	British
	Columbia, Canada
 | 
	Chairperson
	of Advisory Board
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Myron
	Trenne
 | 
	Michigan,
	USA
 | 
	Advisory
	Board member
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Anthony
	Luzi
 | 
	Nevada,
	USA
 | 
	Advisory
	Board member
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Bill
	Calsbeck
 | 
	British
	Columbia, Canada
 | 
	Advisory
	Board member
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Mike
	Volker
 | 
	British
	Columbia, Canada
 | 
	Advisory
	Board member
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Jim
	Fletcher
 | 
	British
	Columbia, Canada
 | 
	Advisory
	Board member
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Ted
	Wilkinson
 | 
	British
	Columbia, Canada
 | 
	Advisory
	Board member
 | 
 
	 
	Myron Trenne, Advisory Board
	 
	Mr. Trenne’s background in the automotive industry includes
	research and development roles at the General Motors Technical
	Center before becoming a founding member and Vice President of
	Engineering at TRW Transportation Electronics.
	 
	Mr. Trenne further developed his management skills through his role
	of General Manager of Eaton’s automotive research and
	development center and Yazaki North America, Inc. During his time
	at Yazaki North America, Inc., Mr. Trenne was the Vice President of
	research and development and marketing and was the General Manager
	responsible for overseeing a US$100 million business
	unit.
	 
	As a pioneer of automotive digital technology, Mr. Trenne led the
	first team to apply a programmable microcomputer to a car, which
	integrated anti-lock braking system, traction, cruise control,
	ignition and digital instruments with a single digital processor.
	Subsequent system developments included gas and diesel electronic
	fuel injection, EVs, vehicle electrical architectures, vehicle
	fiber optics, high voltage EV components, and Intelligent
	Transportation Systems. Furthermore, Mr. Trenne has authored over a
	dozen vehicle system and control patents.
	 
	Mr. Trenne had previously served as Treasurer for the Convergence
	Transportation Electronics Association which merged with the
	Society of Automotive Engineers in 2009. Mr. Trenne has served many
	roles in the SAE including Committee Chair and Board
	positions.
	 
	Mr. Trenne received a Bachelor of Science in electrical engineering
	from Kettering University, formerly known as the General Motors
	Institute. He also received his Master of Science in electrical
	engineering from the University of Colorado and is a licensed
	Professional Engineer.
	 
	Mike Volker, Advisory Board
	 
	Mr. Volker is an entrepreneur and angel investor active in the
	development of new high technology ventures. Shortly after
	completing his education at the University of Waterloo, Mr. Volker
	founded Volker-Craig Ltd, a video terminal manufacturer, in 1973.
	After the sale of Volker-Craig Ltd. in 1981, Mr. Volker focused on
	supporting entrepreneurs in building their business and investing
	in start-ups. Mr. Volker’s dedication in helping
	entrepreneurs has led him to expand his reach into public education
	and leading entrepreneurship-centric organizations.
	 
	As an instructor, Mr. Volker teaches a business course and an
	intellectual property management course at Simon Fraser University
	where he is also the Director of the SFU’s Innovation Office,
	which facilitates the creation of new university-industry research
	and development partnerships and commercializes the
	university’s research results.
	 
	His recent projects include: GreenAngel Energy Corp, a public
	company that invests in green technologies and the Western
	Universities Technology Innovation Fund, an angel fund for
	start-ups. Mr. Volker runs the Vancouver Angel Technology Network
	and is actively involved with New Ventures BC, an annual business
	competition.
	 
	Mr. Volker holds a Bachelor’s degree in engineering and a
	Masters in Applied Science from the University of
	Waterloo.
	 
	Family Relationships
	 
	There are no family relationships among any of our directors and
	executive officers.
	 
	35
	 
	 
	 
	Term of Office
	 
	Each director of our company is to serve for a term of one year
	ending on the date of the subsequent annual meeting of stockholders
	following the annual meeting at which such director was elected.
	Notwithstanding the foregoing, each director is to serve until his
	successor is elected and qualified or until his death, resignation
	or removal. Our Board of Directors appoints our officers and each
	officer is to serve until his successor is appointed and qualified
	or until his or her death, resignation or removal.
	 
	Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
	 
	During the past ten years, none of our directors or executive
	officers have been the subject of the following
	events:
	 
| 
	1.
 | 
	a
	petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency
	law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar
	officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of
	such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner
	at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any
	corporation or business association of which he was an executive
	officer at or within two years before the time of such
	filing;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	2.
 | 
	convicted
	in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending
	criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor
	offenses);
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	3.
 | 
	the
	subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently
	reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent
	jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or
	otherwise limiting, the following activities;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	i)
 | 
	acting
	as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity
	trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage
	transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity
	Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the
	foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or
	dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or
	employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan
	association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any
	conduct or practice in connection with such activity;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	ii)
 | 
	engaging
	in any type of business practice; or
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	iii)
 | 
	engaging
	in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any
	security or commodity or in connection with any violation of
	Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities
	laws;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	4.
 | 
	the
	subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently
	reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority
	barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the
	right of such person to engage in any activity described in
	paragraph 3.i in the preceding paragraph or to be associated with
	persons engaged in any such activity;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	5.
 | 
	was
	found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by
	the SEC to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and
	the judgment in such civil action or finding by the SEC has not
	been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	6.
 | 
	was
	found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by
	the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any
	Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or
	finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been
	subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	7.
 | 
	was the
	subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or
	administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not
	subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged
	violation of:
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	i)
 | 
	any
	Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation;
	or
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	ii)
 | 
	any law
	or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance
	companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent
	injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money
	penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or
	removal or prohibition order, or
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	iii)
 | 
	any law
	or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection
	with any business entity; or
 
	 
 | 
| 
	8.
 | 
	was the
	subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently
	reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization
	(as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C.
	78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29)
	of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any
	equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has
	disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with
	a member.
 | 
 
	 
	36
	 
	 
	 
	Director Independence
	 
	Our Board has determined that the following directors are
	“independent” as such directors do not have a direct or
	indirect material relationship with our company. A material
	relationship is a relationship which could, in the view of our
	Board of Directors, be reasonably expected to interfere with the
	exercise of a director’s independent judgment.
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Shaun
	Greffard;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Robert
	Tarzwell;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Luisa
	Ingargiola; and
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	Steven
	Sanders.
 | 
 
	 
	Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
	 
	On December 22, 2017, we adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics that
	applies to our directors, officers and other
	employees.
	 
	B. 
	Compensation
	 
	Compensation Discussion and Analysis
	 
	This
	section sets out the objectives of our Company’s executive
	compensation arrangements, our Company’s executive
	compensation philosophy and the application of this philosophy to
	our Company’s executive compensation arrangements. It also
	provides an analysis of the compensation design, and the decisions
	that the Board made in fiscal 2016 with respect to the Named
	Executive Officers. When determining the compensation arrangements
	for the Named Executive Officers, our Board of Directors acting as
	the Compensation Committee considers the objectives of: (i)
	retaining an executive critical to the success of the Company and
	the enhancement of shareholder value; (ii) providing fair and
	competitive compensation; (iii) balancing the interests of
	management and our Company’s shareholders; and (iv) rewarding
	performance, both on an individual basis and with respect to the
	business in general.
	 
	Benchmarking
	 
	Our Board of Directors established a Compensation Committee in
	March 2018. Prior to that, our Board of Directors acted as the
	Compensation Committee.
	 
	The Compensation Committee will consider a variety of factors when
	designing and establishing, reviewing and making recommendations
	for executive compensation arrangements for all our executive
	officers. The Compensation Committee does not intend to position
	executive pay to reflect a single percentile within the industry
	for each executive. Rather, in determining the compensation level
	for each executive, the Compensation Committee will look at factors
	such as the relative complexity of the executive’s role
	within the organization, the executive’s performance and
	potential for future advancement and pay equity
	considerations.
	 
	Elements of Compensation
	 
	The
	compensation paid to Named Executive Officers in any year consists
	of two primary components:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(a)
 | 
	base
	salary; and
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(b)
 | 
	long-term
	incentives in the form of stock options granted under our Stock
	Option Plan.
 | 
 
	 
	The key
	features of these two primary components of compensation are
	discussed below:
	 
	1.        
	Base
	Salary
	 
	Base
	salary recognizes the value of an individual to our Company based
	on his or her role, skill, performance, contributions, leadership
	and potential. It is critical in attracting and retaining executive
	talent in the markets in which the Company competes for talent.
	Base salaries for the Named Executive Officers are intended to be
	reviewed annually. Any change in base salary of a Named Executive
	Officer is generally determined by an assessment of such
	executive’s performance, a consideration of competitive
	compensation levels in companies similar to the Company (in
	particular, companies in the EV industry) and a review of the
	performance of the Company as a whole and the role such executive
	officer played in such corporate performance.
	 
	2.        
	Stock
	Option Awards
	 
	The
	Company provides long-term incentives to Named Executive Officers
	in the form of stock options as part of its overall executive
	compensation strategy. Our Board of Directors acting as the
	Compensation Committee believes that stock option grants serve the
	Company’s executive compensation philosophy in several ways:
	firstly, it helps attract, retain, and motivate talent; secondly,
	it aligns the interests of the Named Executive Officers with those
	of the shareholders by linking a specific portion of the
	officer’s total pay opportunity to the share price; and
	finally, it provides long-term accountability for Named Executive
	Officers.
	 
	 
	37
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Risks Associated with Compensation Policies and
	Practices
	 
	The
	oversight and administration of the Company’s executive
	compensation program requires the Board of Directors acting as the
	Compensation Committee to consider risks associated with the
	Company’s compensation policies and practices. Potential
	risks associated with compensation policies and compensation awards
	are considered at annual reviews and also throughout the year
	whenever it is deemed necessary by the Board of Directors acting as
	the Compensation Committee.
	 
	The
	Company’s executive compensation policies and practices are
	intended to align management incentives with the long-term
	interests of the Corporation and its shareholders. In each case,
	the Corporation seeks an appropriate balance of risk and reward.
	Practices that are designed to avoid inappropriate or excessive
	risks include (i) financial controls that provide limits and
	authorities in areas such as capital and operating expenditures to
	mitigate risk taking that could affect compensation, (ii) balancing
	base salary and variable compensation elements and (iii) spreading
	compensation across short and long-term programs.
	 
	Compensation Governance
	 
	The
	Compensation Committee intends to conduct a yearly review of
	directors’ compensation having regard to various reports on
	current trends in directors’ compensation and compensation
	data for directors of reporting issuers of comparative size to the
	Company. Director compensation is currently limited to the grant of
	stock options pursuant to the Stock Option Plan. It is anticipated
	that the Chief Executive Officer will review the compensation of
	executive officers of the Company for the prior year and in
	comparison to industry standards via information disclosed publicly
	and obtained through copies of surveys. The Board expects that the
	Chief Executive Officer will make recommendations on compensation
	to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will
	review and make suggestions with respect to compensation proposals,
	and then makes a recommendation to the Board.
	 
	The
	Compensation Committee is currently comprised of Jerry Kroll, Shaun
	Greffard and Robert Tarzwell, which is currently the entire Board
	of Directors.
	 
	The
	Compensation Committee’s responsibility will be to formulate
	and make recommendations to the directors of the Company in respect
	of compensation issues relating to directors and executive officers
	of the Company. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
	the Compensation Committee when formed will have the following
	duties:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(a)
 | 
	to
	review the compensation philosophy and remuneration policy for
	executive officers of the Company and to recommend to the directors
	of the Company changes to improve the Company’s ability to
	recruit, retain and motivate executive officers;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(b)
 | 
	to
	review and recommend to the Board the retainer and fees, if any, to
	be paid to directors of the Company;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(c)
 | 
	to
	review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to the
	compensation of the CEO, evaluate the CEO’s performance in
	light of those corporate goals and objectives, and determine (or
	make recommendations to the directors of the Company with respect
	to) the CEO’s compensation level based on such
	evaluation;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(d)
 | 
	to
	recommend to the directors of the Company with respect to non-CEO
	officer and director compensation including reviewing
	management’s recommendations for proposed stock options and
	other incentive-compensation plans and equity- based plans, if any,
	for non-CEO officer and director compensation and make
	recommendations in respect thereof to the directors of the
	Company;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(e)
 | 
	to
	administer the stock option plan approved by the directors of the
	Company in accordance with its terms including the recommendation
	to the directors of the Company of the grant of stock options in
	accordance with the terms thereof; and
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(f)
 | 
	to
	determine and recommend for the approval of the directors of the
	Company bonuses to be paid to executive officers and employees of
	the Company and to establish targets or criteria for the payment of
	such bonuses, if appropriate. Pursuant to the mandate and terms of
	reference of the Compensation Committee, meetings of the
	Compensation Committee are to take place at least once per year and
	at such other times as the Chair of the Compensation Committee may
	determine.
 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	38
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Summary Compensation Table
	 
	The
	following table sets forth all annual and long-term compensation
	for services in all capacities to the Company during the fiscal
	periods indicated in respect of the Named Executive
	Officers:
	 
	Compensation Discussion and Analysis
	 
	This section sets out the objectives of our company’s
	executive compensation arrangements, our company’s executive
	compensation philosophy and the application of this philosophy to
	our company’s executive compensation arrangements. It also
	provides an analysis of the compensation design, and the decisions
	that the Board made in fiscal 2016 with respect to our Named
	Executive Officers (as defined below). When determining the
	compensation arrangements for the Named Executive Officers, our
	Board of Directors acting as the Compensation Committee considers
	the objectives of: (i) retaining an executive critical to our
	success and the enhancement of shareholder value; (ii) providing
	fair and competitive compensation; (iii) balancing the interests of
	management and our shareholders; and (iv) rewarding performance,
	both on an individual basis and with respect to the business in
	general.
	 
	Benchmarking
	 
	Our Board of Directors established a Compensation Committee in
	March 2018. Prior to that, our Board of Directors acted as the
	Compensation Committee.
	 
	The Compensation Committee will consider a variety of factors when
	designing and establishing, reviewing and making recommendations
	for executive compensation arrangements for all our executive
	officers. The Compensation Committee does not intend to position
	executive pay to reflect a single percentile within the industry
	for each executive. Rather, in determining the compensation level
	for each executive, the Compensation Committee will look at factors
	such as the relative complexity of the executive’s role
	within the organization, the executive’s performance and
	potential for future advancement and pay equity
	considerations.
	 
	Elements of Compensation
	 
	The compensation paid to Named Executive Officers in any year
	consists of two primary components:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(a)
 | 
	base
	salary; and
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(b)
 | 
	long-term
	incentives in the form of stock options granted under our Stock
	Option Plan (as defined below).
 | 
 
	 
	The key features of these two primary components of compensation
	are discussed below:
	 
	 
	Base salary recognizes the value of an individual to our company
	based on his or her role, skill, performance, contributions,
	leadership and potential. It is critical in attracting and
	retaining executive talent in the markets in which we compete for
	talent. Base salaries for the Named Executive Officers are intended
	to be reviewed annually. Any change in base salary of a Named
	Executive Officer is generally determined by an assessment of such
	executive’s performance, a consideration of competitive
	compensation levels in companies similar to our company (in
	particular, companies in the EV industry) and a review of our
	performance as a whole and the role such executive officer played
	in such corporate performance.
	 
	 
	We provide long-term incentives to Named Executive Officers in the
	form of stock options as part of its overall executive compensation
	strategy. Our Board of Directors acting as the Compensation
	Committee believes that stock option grants serve our executive
	compensation philosophy in several ways: firstly, it helps attract,
	retain, and motivate talent; secondly, it aligns the interests of
	the Named Executive Officers with those of the shareholders by
	linking a specific portion of the officer’s total pay
	opportunity to the share price; and finally, it provides long-term
	accountability for Named Executive Officers.
	 
	Risks Associated with Compensation Policies and
	Practices
	 
	The oversight and administration of our executive compensation
	program requires the Board of Directors acting as the Compensation
	Committee to consider risks associated with our compensation
	policies and practices. Potential risks associated with
	compensation policies and compensation awards are considered at
	annual reviews and also throughout the year whenever it is deemed
	necessary by the Board of Directors acting as the Compensation
	Committee.
	 
	Our executive compensation policies and practices are intended to
	align management incentives with the long-term interests of the
	Corporation and its shareholders. In each case, the Corporation
	seeks an appropriate balance of risk and reward. Practices that are
	designed to avoid inappropriate or excessive risks include (i)
	financial controls that provide limits and authorities in areas
	such as capital and operating expenditures to mitigate risk taking
	that could affect compensation, (ii) balancing base salary and
	variable compensation elements and (iii) spreading compensation
	across short and long-term programs.
	 
	39
	 
	 
	 
	Compensation Governance
	 
	The Compensation Committee intends to conduct a yearly review of
	directors’ compensation having regard to various reports on
	current trends in directors’ compensation and compensation
	data for directors of reporting issuers of comparative our size.
	Director compensation is currently limited to the grant of stock
	options pursuant to the Stock Option Plan. It is anticipated that
	the Chief Executive Officer will review the compensation of our
	executive officers for the prior year and in comparison to industry
	standards via information disclosed publicly and obtained through
	copies of surveys. The Board expects that the Chief Executive
	Officer will make recommendations on compensation to the
	Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will review and
	make suggestions with respect to compensation proposals, and then
	makes a recommendation to the Board.
	 
	The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of Jerry Kroll,
	Shaun Greffard and Robert Tarzwell, which is currently the entire
	Board of Directors.
	 
	The Compensation Committee’s responsibility is to formulate
	and make recommendations to our directors in respect of
	compensation issues relating to our directors and executive
	officers. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the
	Compensation Committee has the following duties:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(a)
 | 
	to
	review the compensation philosophy and remuneration policy for our
	executive officers and to recommend to our directors changes to
	improve our ability to recruit, retain and motivate executive
	officers;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(b)
 | 
	to
	review and recommend to the Board the retainer and fees, if any, to
	be paid to our directors;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(c)
 | 
	to
	review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to the
	compensation of the CEO, evaluate the CEO’s performance in
	light of those corporate goals and objectives, and determine (or
	make recommendations to our directors with respect to) the
	CEO’s compensation level based on such
	evaluation;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(d)
 | 
	to
	recommend to our directors with respect to non-CEO officer and
	director compensation including reviewing management’s
	recommendations for proposed stock options and other
	incentive-compensation plans and equity-based plans, if any, for
	non-CEO officer and director compensation and make recommendations
	in respect thereof to our directors;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(e)
 | 
	to
	administer the stock option plan approved by our directors in
	accordance with its terms including the recommendation to our
	directors of the grant of stock options in accordance with the
	terms thereof; and
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(f)
 | 
	to
	determine and recommend for the approval of our directors bonuses
	to be paid to our executive officers and employees and to establish
	targets or criteria for the payment of such bonuses, if
	appropriate. Pursuant to the mandate and terms of reference of the
	Compensation Committee, meetings of the Compensation Committee are
	to take place at least once per year and at such other times as the
	Chair of the Compensation Committee may determine.
 | 
 
	 
	Summary Compensation Table
	 
	The following table sets forth all annual and long-term
	compensation for services in all capacities to the Company during
	the fiscal periods indicated in respect of the executive officers
	set out below (the “Named Executive
	Officers”):
	 
| 
	Named Executive
	 
	Officer and
	 
	Principal Position
 | 
	Year
 |  | 
	Share-
	 
	based
	 
	awards
	 
	($)
 | 
	 
	 
 
	Option-
	based
	 
	awards
	 
	($)(1)
 | 
	Annual
	 
	Incentive
	 
	Plan
	 
	($)
 | 
	Long-term
	 
	Incentive
	 
	Plan
	 
	($)
 | 
	Pension
	 
	Value
	 
	($)
 | 
	All Other
	 
	Compensation
	 
	($)
 |  | 
| 
	Jerry
	Kroll(2) 
 | 
	2017
 | 
	 
	 
	60,000
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	358,045
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	418,694
	 
 | 
| 
	President and
	Chief
	 
	Executive
	Officer
 | 
	2016 
 | 
	 
	 
	30,000
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	887,605
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	917,605
	 
 | 
| 
	Kulwant
	Sandher(3) 
 | 
	2017
 | 
	 
	 
	65,000
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	 
	 
	86,394
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	 
	 
	190,777
	 
 | 
| 
	Chief
	Financial
	 
 | 
	2016
 | 
	 
	 
	31,000
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	  
	  Nil
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	 
	 
	31,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Officer and Secretary
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Iain
	Ball(4) 
 | 
	2017
 | 
	 
	 
	60,000
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	37,235
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	97,883
	 
 | 
| 
	Vice-President,
	 
 | 
	2016 
 | 
	 
	 
	52,500
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	87,958
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	140,458
	 
 | 
| 
	Finance
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Henry
	Reisner(5) 
 | 
	2017
 | 
	 
	 
	60,000
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	69,757
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	130,405
	 
 | 
| 
	Chief
	Operating
	 
 | 
	2016 
 | 
	 
	 
	53,000
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	168,494
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	221,494
	 
 | 
| 
	Officer
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Ed
	Theobald(6) 
 | 
	2017
 | 
	 
	 
	60,000
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	37,235
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	97,883
	 
 | 
| 
	General Manager
 | 
	2016 
 | 
	 
	 
	45,000
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	87,958
	 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	Nil 
 | 
	 
	 
	132,958
	 
 | 
| 
	Mark
	West(7) 
 | 
	2017
 | 
	 
	 
	160,167
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	 
	 
	70,563
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	16,167
 | 
	 
	 
	262,896
	 
 | 
| 
	Vice-President,
	 
 | 
	2016
 | 
	 
	 
	16,000
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | Nil | 
	Nil
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	Nil
 | 
	 
	 
	16,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Sales & Dealerships
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(1)
 | 
	The
	grant date fair values of the share option awards are determined
	using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. For a discussion of the
	assumptions made in the valuation, refer to Note 11 to our
	financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31,
	2016.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(2)
 | 
	Mr.
	Kroll was appointed the President and Chief Executive Officer of
	the Company on February 16, 2015, and served as the Secretary of
	the Company from June 11, 2015 to August 8, 2016.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(3)
 | 
	Mr.
	Sandher was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company on
	June 15, 2016. Mr. Sandher was appointed as Secretary of the
	Company on August 8, 2016.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(4)
 | 
	Mr.
	Ball was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company on June
	4, 2015 and subsequently was appointed Vice- President, Finance of
	the Company on June 27, 2016.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(5)
 | 
	Mr.
	Reisner was appointed Chief Operating Officer of the Company on
	February 16, 2015.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(6)
 | 
	Mr.
	Theobald was appointed General Manager of the Company on February
	16, 2015.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(7)
 | 
	Mr.
	West was appointed Vice-President, Sales & Dealerships of the
	Company on November 1, 2016.
 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	40
	 
	 
	 
	Executive Compensation Agreements
	 
	Jerry Kroll
	 
	On July 1, 2016, our Board of Directors approved the entering into
	of an executive services agreement with Jerry Kroll with a term
	expiring on July 1, 2019 (the 
	“Kroll
	Agreement”
	).
	 
	The Kroll Agreement is subject to automatic renewal on a one-month
	to one-month term renewal basis unless either we or Mr. Kroll
	provides written notice not to renew the Kroll Agreement no later
	than 30 days prior to the end of the then current or renewal
	term.
	 
	Pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Kroll Agreement: (a)
	Mr. Kroll is appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer
	and will undertake and perform the duties and responsibilities
	normally and reasonably associated with such office; (b) we shall
	pay to Mr. Kroll a monthly fee of $5,000; (c) grant to Mr. Kroll
	45,000,000 stock options exercisable into 45,000,000
	common
	shares at an exercise price of $0.15
	per share expiring on June 11, 2022 and 5,000,000 stock options
	exercisable into 5,000,000
	common
	shares at an exercise price of $0.40 per share
	expiring on December 9, 2022 (such options have already been
	granted prior to the Kroll Agreement); (d) provide Mr. Kroll with
	employee benefits, including group health insurance, accidental
	death and dismemberment insurance, travel accident insurance, group
	life insurance, short-term disability insurance, long-term
	disability insurance, drug coverage and dental coverage (the
	“
	Group
	Benefits
	”); and (e) four
	weeks’ paid annual vacation per calendar
	year.
	 
	We may terminate the employment of Mr. Kroll under the Kroll
	Agreement without any notice or any payment in lieu of notice for
	just cause. Mr. Kroll may terminate his employment under the Kroll
	Agreement for any reason by providing not less than 90 calendar
	days’ notice in writing to us, provided, however, that we may
	waive or abridge any notice period specified in such notice in our
	sole and absolute discretion.
	 
	The employment of Mr. Kroll will terminate upon the death of Mr.
	Kroll. Upon the death or Mr. Kroll during the continuance of the
	Kroll Agreement, we will provide Mr. Kroll’s estate and, if
	applicable, Mr. Kroll’s immediate family members with the
	following: (a) three month’s base salary, less any required
	statutory deductions, if any; (b) that portion of any then declared
	and/or earned or accrued bonus, prorated to the end of the
	three-month period from the effective date of termination that our
	chairman determines would likely have been paid to Mr. Kroll; (c)
	any outstanding vacation pay as at the effective date of
	termination; (d) any outstanding expenses owing to Mr. Kroll as at
	the effective date of termination; and (e) subject to our then
	Option Plan and the rules and policies of any regulatory authority
	and stock exchange having jurisdiction over us, allow Mr.
	Kroll’s estate to then exercise any unexercised and fully
	vested portion of stock options on the effective date of
	termination at any time during three months from the effective date
	of termination.
	 
	If we elect to terminate the Kroll Agreement without just cause,
	and provided that Mr. Kroll is in compliance with the relevant
	terms and conditions of the Kroll Agreement, we shall be obligated
	to provide a severance package to Mr. Kroll as follows: (a) a cash
	payment equating to an aggregate of 12 months of the then monthly
	fee, less any required statutory deductions, if any; (b) that
	portion of any then declared and/or earned or accrued bonus,
	prorated to the end of the three-month period from the effective
	date of termination that our chairman determines would likely have
	been paid to Mr. Kroll; (c) the present value, as determined by us,
	acting reasonably, of each of the Group Benefits that would have
	been enjoyed by Mr. Kroll during the next three months from the
	effective date of termination; (d) any outstanding vacation pay as
	at the effective date of termination; (e) any outstanding expenses
	owing to Mr. Kroll as at the effective date of termination; (f)
	maintain Mr. Kroll’s Group Benefits for a period of one year
	from the effective date of termination; and (g) subject to our then
	Option Plan and the rules and policies of any regulatory authority
	and stock exchange having jurisdiction over us, allow Mr. Kroll to
	then exercise any unexercised and fully vested portion of stock
	options on the effective date of termination at any time during
	three months from the effective date of termination.
	 
	Mr. Kroll may terminate his employment under the Kroll Agreement in
	connection with any change in control of us by providing not less
	than 90 calendar days’ notice in writing to us after the
	change in control has been effected; provided, however, that we may
	waive or abridge any notice period specified in such notice in our
	sole and absolute discretion. If Mr. Kroll terminates his
	employment under the Kroll Agreement as a consequence of a change
	in control of us, we will: (a) pay the total of (i) 24
	months’ base salary, less any required statutory deductions,
	if any; (ii) that portion of any then declared and/or earned or
	accrued bonus, prorated to the end of the six-month period from the
	effective date of termination that our chairman determines would
	likely have been paid to Mr. Kroll; (iii) the present value, as
	determined by us, acting reasonably, of each of the Group Benefits
	that would have been enjoyed by Mr. Kroll during the next six
	months from the effective date of termination assuming Mr.
	Kroll’s employment was not terminated and assuming the then
	currently level of Group Benefits were continued for that six
	months; (iv) any outstanding vacation pay as at the effective date
	of termination; (v) any outstanding expenses owing to Mr. Kroll as
	at the effective date of termination; (b) maintain Mr.
	Kroll’s Group Benefits for a period of one year from the
	effective date of termination; and (c) subject to our then Option
	Plan and the rules and policies of any regulatory authority and
	stock exchange having jurisdiction over us, allow Mr. Kroll to then
	exercise any unexercised and fully vested portion of stock options
	on the effective date of termination at any time during three
	months from the effective date of termination.
	 
	41
	 
	 
	 
	Iain Ball
	 
	On July 1, 2016, our Board of Directors approved the entering into
	of an executive services agreement with Iain Ball with a term
	expiring on July 1, 2019 (the 
	“Ball
	Agreement”
	).
	 
	The Ball Agreement is subject to automatic renewal on a one-month
	to one-month term renewal basis unless either we or Mr. Ball
	provides written notice not to renew the Ball Agreement no later
	than 30 days prior to the end of the then current or renewal
	term.
	 
	Pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Ball Agreement: (a) Mr.
	Ball is appointed as our Vice-President, Finance and will undertake
	and perform the duties and responsibilities normally and reasonably
	associated with such office; (b) we shall pay to Mr. Ball a monthly
	fee of $5,000; (c) grant to Mr. Ball 500,000 stock options
	exercisable into 500,000
	common
	shares at an exercise price of $0.15 per share
	expiring on August 13, 2022 and 750,000 stock options exercisable
	into 750,000
	common
	shares at
	an exercise price of $0.40 per share expiring on December 9, 2022
	(such options have already been granted prior to the Ball
	Agreement); (d) provide Mr. Ball with Group Benefits,; and (e) four
	weeks’ paid annual vacation per calendar
	year.
	 
	We may terminate the employment of Mr. Ball under the Ball
	Agreement without any notice or any payment in lieu of notice for
	just cause. Mr. Ball may terminate his employment under the Ball
	Agreement for any reason by providing not less than 90 calendar
	days’ notice in writing to us, provided, however, that we may
	waive or abridge any notice period specified in such notice in our
	sole and absolute discretion.
	 
	The employment of Mr. Ball will terminate upon the death of Mr.
	Ball. Upon the death or Mr. Ball during the continuance of the Ball
	Agreement, we will provide Mr. Ball’s estate and, if
	applicable, Mr. Balls’ immediate family members with the
	following: (a) three month’s base salary, less any required
	statutory deductions, if any; (b) that portion of any then declared
	and/or earned or accrued bonus, prorated to the end of the
	three-month period from the effective date of termination that our
	President determines would likely have been paid to Mr. Ball; (c)
	any outstanding vacation pay as at the effective date of
	termination; (d) any outstanding expenses owing to Mr. Ball as at
	the effective date of termination; and (e) subject to our then
	Option Plan and the rules and policies of any regulatory authority
	and stock exchange having jurisdiction over us, allow Mr.
	Ball’s estate to then exercise any unexercised and fully
	vested portion of stock options on the effective date of
	termination at any time during three months from the effective date
	of termination.
	 
	If we elect to terminate the Ball Agreement without just cause, and
	provided that Mr. Ball is in compliance with the relevant terms and
	conditions of the Ball Agreement, we shall be obligated to provide
	a severance package to Mr. Ball as follows: (a) a cash payment
	equating to an aggregate of six month’s base salary, less any
	required statutory deductions, if any; (b) that portion of any then
	declared and/or earned or accrued bonus, prorated to the end of the
	three-month period from the effective date of termination that our
	President determines would likely have been paid to Mr. Ball; (c)
	the present value, as determined by us, acting reasonably, of each
	of the Group Benefits that would have been enjoyed by Mr. Ball
	during the next three months from the effective date of
	termination; (d) any outstanding vacation pay as at the effective
	date of termination; (e) any outstanding expenses owing to Mr. Ball
	as at the effective date of termination; (f) maintain Mr.
	Ball’s Group Benefits for a period of six months from the
	effective date of termination; and (g) subject to our then Option
	Plan and the rules and policies of any regulatory authority and
	stock exchange having jurisdiction over us, allow Mr. Ball to then
	exercise any unexercised and fully vested portion of stock options
	on the effective date of termination at any time during three
	months from the effective date of termination.
	 
	Mr. Ball may terminate his employment under the Ball Agreement in
	connection with any change in control of us by providing not less
	than 90 calendar days’ notice in writing to us after the
	change in control has been effected; provided, however, that we may
	waive or abridge any notice period specified in such notice in our
	sole and absolute discretion. If Mr. Ball terminates his employment
	under the Ball Agreement as a consequence of a change in control of
	us, we will: (a) pay the total of (i) 12 months’ base salary,
	less any required statutory deductions, if any; (ii) that portion
	of any then declared and/or earned or accrued bonus, prorated to
	the end of the six-month period from the effective date of
	termination that our President determines would likely have been
	paid to Mr. Ball; (iii) the present value, as determined by us,
	acting reasonably, of each of the Group Benefits that would have
	been enjoyed by Mr. Ball during the next six months from the
	effective date of termination assuming Mr. Ball’s employment
	was not terminated and assuming the then currently level of Group
	Benefits were continued for that six months; (iv) any outstanding
	vacation pay as at the effective date of termination; (v) any
	outstanding expenses owing to Mr. Ball as at the effective date of
	termination; (b) maintain Mr. Ball’s Group Benefits for a
	period of six months from the effective date of termination; and
	(c) subject to our then Option Plan and the rules and policies of
	any regulatory authority and stock exchange having jurisdiction
	over us, allow Mr. Ball to then exercise any unexercised and fully
	vested portion of stock options on the effective date of
	termination at any time during three months from the effective date
	of termination.
	 
	42
	 
	 
	 
	Ed Theobald
	 
	On July 1, 2016, our Board of Directors approved the entering into
	of an executive services agreement with Edward Theobald with a term
	expiring on July 1, 2019 (the 
	“Theobald
	Agreement”
	).
	 
	The Theobald Agreement is subject to automatic renewal on a
	one-month to one-month term renewal basis unless either we or Mr.
	Theobald provides written notice not to renew the Theobald
	Agreement no later than 30 days prior to the end of the then
	current or renewal term.
	 
	Pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Theobald Agreement: (a)
	Mr. Theobald is appointed as our General Manager and will undertake
	and perform the duties and responsibilities normally and reasonably
	associated with such office; (b) we shall pay to Mr. Theobald a
	monthly fee of $5,000; (c) grant to Mr. Theobald 500,000 stock
	options exercisable into 500,000
	common
	shares at an exercise price of $0.15 per share
	expiring on August 13, 2022 and 750,000 stock options exercisable
	into 750,000
	common
	shares at
	an exercise price of $0.40 per share expiring on December 9, 2022
	(such options have already been granted prior to the Theobald
	Agreement); (d) provide Mr. Theobald with Group Benefits; and (e)
	four weeks’ paid annual vacation per calendar
	year.
	 
	We may terminate the employment of Mr. Theobald under the Theobald
	Agreement without any notice or any payment in lieu of notice for
	just cause. Mr. Theobald may terminate his employment under the
	Theobald Agreement for any reason by providing not less than 90
	calendar days’ notice in writing to us, provided, however,
	that we may waive or abridge any notice period specified in such
	notice in our sole and absolute discretion.
	 
	The employment of Mr. Theobald will terminate upon the death of Mr.
	Theobald. Upon the death or Mr. Theobald during the continuance of
	the Theobald Agreement, we will provide Mr. Theobald’s estate
	and, if applicable, Mr. Theobalds’ immediate family members
	with the following: (a) three month’s base salary, less any
	required statutory deductions, if any; (b) that portion of any then
	declared and/or earned or accrued bonus, prorated to the end of the
	three-month period from the effective date of termination that our
	President determines would likely have been paid to Mr. Theobald;
	(c) any outstanding vacation pay as at the effective date of
	termination; (d) any outstanding expenses owing to Mr. Theobald as
	at the effective date of termination; and (e) subject to our then
	Option Plan and the rules and policies of any regulatory authority
	and stock exchange having jurisdiction over us, allow Mr.
	Theobald’s estate to then exercise any unexercised and fully
	vested portion of stock options on the effective date of
	termination at any time during three months from the effective date
	of termination.
	 
	If we elect to terminate the Theobald Agreement without just cause,
	and provided that Mr. Theobald is in compliance with the relevant
	terms and conditions of the Theobald Agreement, we shall be
	obligated to provide a severance package to Mr. Theobald as
	follows: (a) a cash payment equating to an aggregate of six
	month’s base salary, less any required statutory deductions,
	if any; (b) that portion of any then declared and/or earned or
	accrued bonus, prorated to the end of the three-month period from
	the effective date of termination that our President determines
	would likely have been paid to Mr. Theobald; (c) the present value,
	as determined by us, acting reasonably, of each of the Group
	Benefits that would have been enjoyed by Mr. Theobald during the
	next three months from the effective date of termination; (d) any
	outstanding vacation pay as at the effective date of termination;
	(e) any outstanding expenses owing to Mr. Theobald as at the
	effective date of termination; (f) maintain Mr. Theobald’s
	Group Benefits for a period of six months from the effective date
	of termination; and (g) subject to our then Option Plan and the
	rules and policies of any regulatory authority and stock exchange
	having jurisdiction over us, allow Mr. Theobald to then exercise
	any unexercised and fully vested portion of stock options on the
	effective date of termination at any time during three months from
	the effective date of termination.
	 
	Mr. Theobald may terminate his employment under the Theobald
	Agreement in connection with any change in control of us by
	providing not less than 90 calendar days’ notice in writing
	to us after the change in control has been effected; provided,
	however, that we may waive or abridge any notice period specified
	in such notice in our sole and absolute discretion. If Mr. Theobald
	terminates his employment under the Theobald Agreement as a
	consequence of a change in control of us, we will: (a) pay the
	total of (i) 12 months’ base salary, less any required
	statutory deductions, if any; (ii) that portion of any then
	declared and/or earned or accrued bonus, prorated to the end of the
	six-month period from the effective date of termination that our
	President determines would likely have been paid to Mr. Theobald;
	(iii) the present value, as determined by us, acting reasonably, of
	each of the Group Benefits that would have been enjoyed by Mr.
	Theobald during the next six months from the effective date of
	termination assuming Mr. Theobald’s employment was not
	terminated and assuming the then currently level of Group Benefits
	were continued for that six months; (iv) any outstanding vacation
	pay as at the effective date of termination; (v) any outstanding
	expenses owing to Mr. Theobald as at the effective date of
	termination; (b) maintain Mr. Theobald’s Group Benefits for a
	period of six months from the effective date of termination; and
	(c) subject to our then Option Plan and the rules and policies of
	any regulatory authority and stock exchange having jurisdiction
	over us, allow Mr. Theobald to then exercise any unexercised and
	fully vested portion of stock options on the effective date of
	termination at any time during three months from the effective date
	of termination.
	 
	43
	 
	 
	 
	Kulwant Sandher
	 
	On July 1, 2016, our Board of Directors approved the entering into
	of an executive services agreement with Hurricane Corporate
	Services Ltd. (“Hurricane Corp.”), Mr. Sandher’s
	services corporation, with a term expiring on July 1, 2019
	(the 
	“Sandher
	Agreement”
	).
	 
	The Sandher Agreement is subject to automatic renewal on a
	one-month to one-month term renewal basis unless either we or
	Hurricane Corp. provides written notice not to renew the Sandher
	Agreement no later than 30 days prior to the end of the then
	current or renewal term.
	 
	Pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Sandher Agreement: (a)
	through Hurricane Corp, Mr. Sandher is appointed as our Chief
	Financial Officer and will undertake and perform the duties and
	responsibilities normally and reasonably associated with such
	office; (b) we shall pay to Hurricane Corp. a monthly fee of
	$5,000; (c) grant to Hurricane Corp. and/or Mr. Sandher as soon as
	reasonably practicable after the effective date of the Sandher
	Agreement stock options to purchase a certain number of
	common
	shares on terms reasonably
	consistent with our other recent executive officers; (d) provide
	Hurricane Corp. and/or Mr. Sandher with Group Benefits; and (e)
	four weeks’ paid annual vacation per calendar
	year.
	 
	We may terminate the engagement of Hurricane Corp. under the
	Sandher Agreement without any notice or any payment in lieu of
	notice for just cause. Hurricane Corp. may terminate its engagement
	under the Sandher Agreement for any reason by providing not less
	than 90 calendar days’ notice in writing to us, provided,
	however, that we may waive or abridge any notice period specified
	in such notice in our sole and absolute discretion.
	 
	The engagement of Hurricane Corp. will terminate upon the death of
	Mr. Sandher. Upon the death or Mr. Sandher during the continuance
	of the Sandher Agreement, we will provide Mr. Sandher’s
	estate and, if applicable, Mr. Sandher’s immediate family
	members with the following: (a) three month’s base salary,
	less any required statutory deductions, if any; (b) that portion of
	any then declared and/or earned or accrued bonus, prorated to the
	end of the three-month period from the effective date of
	termination that our President determines would likely have been
	paid to Hurricane Corp.; (c) any outstanding vacation pay as at the
	effective date of termination; (d) any outstanding expenses owing
	to Hurricane Corp. as at the effective date of termination; and (e)
	subject to our then Option Plan and the rules and policies of any
	regulatory authority and stock exchange having jurisdiction over
	us, allow Mr. Sandher’s estate to then exercise any
	unexercised and fully vested portion of stock options on the
	effective date of termination at any time during three months from
	the effective date of termination.
	 
	If we elect to terminate the Sandher Agreement without just cause,
	and provided that Hurricane Corp. is in compliance with the
	relevant terms and conditions of the Sandher Agreement, we shall be
	obligated to provide Hurricane Corp. with the following: (a) a cash
	payment equating to an aggregate of six month’s base salary,
	less any required statutory deductions, if any; (b) that portion of
	any then declared and/or earned or accrued bonus, prorated to the
	end of the three-month period from the effective date of
	termination that our President determines would likely have been
	paid to Hurricane Corp.; (c) the present value, as determined by
	us, acting reasonably, of each of the Group Benefits that would
	have been enjoyed by Hurricane Corp. and/or Mr. Sandher during the
	next three months from the effective date of termination; (d) any
	outstanding vacation pay as at the effective date of termination;
	(e) any outstanding expenses owing to Hurricane Corp. as at the
	effective date of termination; (f) maintain Hurricane Corp.’s
	and/or Mr. Sandher’s Group Benefits for a period of six
	months from the effective date of termination; and (g) subject to
	our then Option Plan and the rules and policies of any regulatory
	authority and stock exchange having jurisdiction over us, allow the
	Executive and Mr. Sandher to then exercise any unexercised and
	fully vested portion of stock options on the effective date of
	termination at any time during three months from the effective date
	of termination.
	 
	Hurricane Corp. may terminate its engagement under the Sandher
	Agreement in connection with any change in control of us by
	providing not less than 90 calendar days’ notice in writing
	to us after the change in control has been effected; provided,
	however, that we may waive or abridge any notice period specified
	in such notice in our sole and absolute discretion. If Hurricane
	Corp. terminates its engagement under the Sandher Agreement as a
	consequence of a change in control of us, we will: (a) pay the
	total of (i) 12 months’ base salary, less any required
	statutory deductions, if any; (ii) that portion of any then
	declared and/or earned or accrued bonus, prorated to the end of the
	six-month period from the effective date of termination that our
	President determines would likely have been paid to Hurricane
	Corp.; (iii) the present value, as determined by us, acting
	reasonably, of each of the Group Benefits that would have been
	enjoyed by Hurricane Corp. and/or Mr. Sandher during the next six
	months from the effective date of termination assuming Hurricane
	Corp.’s engagement was not terminated and assuming the then
	currently level of Group Benefits were continued for that six
	months; (iv) any outstanding vacation pay as at the effective date
	of termination; (v) any outstanding expenses owing to Hurricane
	Corp. as at the effective date of termination; (b) maintain
	Hurricane Corp.’s and/or Mr. Sandher’s Group Benefits
	for a period of six months from the effective date of termination;
	and (c) subject to our then Option Plan and the rules and policies
	of any regulatory authority and stock exchange having jurisdiction
	over us, allow Hurricane Corp. and Mr. Sandher to then exercise any
	unexercised and fully vested portion of stock options on the
	effective date of termination at any time during three months from
	the effective date of termination.
	 
	44
	 
	 
	 
	Henry Reisner
	 
	On July 1, 2016, our Board of Directors approved the entering into
	of an executive services agreement with Henry Reisner with a term
	expiring on July 1, 2019 (the 
	“Reisner
	Agreement”
	).
	 
	The Reisner Agreement is subject to automatic renewal on a
	one-month to one-month term renewal basis unless either we or Mr.
	Reisner provides written notice not to renew the Reisner Agreement
	no later than 30 days prior to the end of the then current or
	renewal term.
	 
	Pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Reisner Agreement: (a)
	Mr. Reisner is appointed as our Vice-President, Finance and will
	undertake and perform the duties and responsibilities normally and
	reasonably associated with such office; (b) we shall pay to Mr.
	Reisner a monthly fee of $5,000; (c) grant to Mr. Reisner 1,250,000
	stock options exercisable into 1,250,000
	common
	shares at an exercise price of $0.15 per share
	expiring on August 13, 2022 and 1,250,000 stock options exercisable
	into 1,250,000
	common
	shares at
	an exercise price of $0.40 per share expiring on December 9, 2022
	(such options have already been granted prior to the Reisner
	Agreement); (d) provide Mr. Reisner with Group Benefits; and (e)
	four weeks’ paid annual vacation per calendar
	year.
	 
	We may terminate the employment of Mr. Reisner under the Reisner
	Agreement without any notice or any payment in lieu of notice for
	just cause. Mr. Reisner may terminate his employment under the
	Reisner Agreement for any reason by providing not less than 90
	calendar days’ notice in writing to us, provided, however,
	that we may waive or abridge any notice period specified in such
	notice in our sole and absolute discretion.
	 
	The employment of Mr. Reisner will terminate upon the death of Mr.
	Reisner. Upon the death or Mr. Reisner during the continuance of
	the Reisner Agreement, we will provide Mr. Reisner’s estate
	and, if applicable, Mr. Reisner’s immediate family members
	with the following: (a) three month’s base salary, less any
	required statutory deductions, if any; (b) that portion of any then
	declared and/or earned or accrued bonus, prorated to the end of the
	three-month period from the effective date of termination that our
	President determines would likely have been paid to Mr. Reisner;
	(c) any outstanding vacation pay as at the effective date of
	termination; (d) any outstanding expenses owing to Mr. Reisner as
	at the effective date of termination; and (e) subject to our then
	Option Plan and the rules and policies of any regulatory authority
	and stock exchange having jurisdiction over us, allow Mr.
	Reisner’s estate to then exercise any unexercised and fully
	vested portion of stock options on the effective date of
	termination at any time during three months from the effective date
	of termination.
	 
	If we elect to terminate the Reisner Agreement without just cause,
	and provided that Mr. Reisner is in compliance with the relevant
	terms and conditions of the Reisner Agreement, we shall be
	obligated to provide a severance package to Mr. Reisner as follows:
	(a) a cash payment equating to an aggregate of six month’s
	base salary, less any required statutory deductions, if any; (b)
	that portion of any then declared and/or earned or accrued bonus,
	prorated to the end of the three-month period from the effective
	date of termination that our President determines would likely have
	been paid to Mr. Reisner; (c) the present value, as determined by
	us, acting reasonably, of each of the Group Benefits that would
	have been enjoyed by Mr. Reisner during the next three months from
	the effective date of termination; (d) any outstanding vacation pay
	as at the effective date of termination; (e) any outstanding
	expenses owing to Mr. Reisner as at the effective date of
	termination; (f) maintain Mr. Reisner’s Group Benefits for a
	period of six months from the effective date of termination; and
	(g) subject to our then Option Plan and the rules and policies of
	any regulatory authority and stock exchange having jurisdiction
	over us, allow Mr. Reisner to then exercise any unexercised and
	fully vested portion of stock options on the effective date of
	termination at any time during three months from the effective date
	of termination.
	 
	Mr. Reisner may terminate his employment under the Reisner
	Agreement in connection with any change in control of us by
	providing not less than 90 calendar days’ notice in writing
	to us after the change in control has been effected; provided,
	however, that we may waive or abridge any notice period specified
	in such notice in our sole and absolute discretion. If Mr. Reisner
	terminates his employment under the Reisner Agreement as a
	consequence of a change in control of us, we will: (a) pay the
	total of (i) 12 months’ base salary, less any required
	statutory deductions, if any; (ii) that portion of any then
	declared and/or earned or accrued bonus, prorated to the end of the
	six-month period from the effective date of termination that our
	President determines would likely have been paid to Mr. Reisner;
	(iii) the present value, as determined by us, acting reasonably, of
	each of the Group Benefits that would have been enjoyed by Mr.
	Reisner during the next six months from the effective date of
	termination assuming Mr. Reisner’s employment was not
	terminated and assuming the then currently level of Group Benefits
	were continued for that six months; (iv) any outstanding vacation
	pay as at the effective date of termination; (v) any outstanding
	expenses owing to Mr. Reisner as at the effective date of
	termination; (b) maintain Mr. Reisner’s Group Benefits for a
	period of six months from the effective date of termination; and
	(c) subject to our then Option Plan and the rules and policies of
	any regulatory authority and stock exchange having jurisdiction
	over us, allow Mr. Reisner to then exercise any unexercised and
	fully vested portion of stock options on the effective date of
	termination at any time during three months from the effective date
	of termination.
	 
	45
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Mark West
	 
	On November 1, 2016, our Board of Directors approved the entering
	into of an executive services agreement with Mark West with a term
	expiring on November 1, 2019 (the 
	“West
	Agreement”
	).
	 
	The West Agreement is subject to automatic renewal on a one-month
	to one-month term renewal basis unless either we or Mr. West
	provides written notice not to renew the West Agreement no later
	than 30 days prior to the end of the then current or renewal
	term.
	 
	Pursuant to the terms and provisions of the West Agreement: (a) Mr.
	West is appointed as our Vice-President, Sales & Dealerships
	and will undertake and perform the duties and responsibilities
	normally and reasonably associated with such office; (b) we shall
	pay to Mr. West an initial monthly fee of $4,000 for the month of
	November 2016, and thereafter a monthly fee of $12,000; (c) pay Mr.
	West a commission of $10,000 for each and every dealership which is
	officially opened, which was directly sourced and completed by Mr.
	West and which is established under an authorization to sell and
	distribute our goods and services in a particular area; (c) grant
	to Mr. West as soon as reasonably practicable after the effective
	date of the West Agreement stock options to purchase a certain
	number of common shares on terms reasonably consistent with our
	other recent executive officers; (d) provide Mr. West with
	individual benefits of up to $10,000 per annum as a car allowance
	and up to $5,000 per annum as an education allowance (the
	“
	Individual
	Benefits
	”); (e) provide
	Mr. West with Group Benefits; and (f) four weeks’ paid annual
	vacation per calendar year.
	 
	We may terminate the employment of Mr. West under the West
	Agreement without any notice or any payment in lieu of notice for
	just cause. Mr. West may terminate his employment under the West
	Agreement for any reason by providing not less than 90 calendar
	days’ notice in writing to us, provided, however, that we may
	waive or abridge any notice period specified in such notice in our
	sole and absolute discretion.
	 
	The employment of Mr. West will terminate upon the death of Mr.
	West. Upon the death or Mr. West during the continuance of the West
	Agreement, we will provide Mr. West’s estate and, if
	applicable, Mr. West’s immediate family members with the
	following: (a) three month’s base salary, less any required
	statutory deductions, if any; (b) any outstanding commissions, less
	any required statutory deductions, if any; (c) that portion of any
	then declared and/or earned or accrued bonus, prorated to the end
	of the three-month period from the effective date of termination
	that our President determines would likely have been paid to Mr.
	West; (d) any outstanding vacation pay as at the effective date of
	termination; (e) any outstanding expenses owing to Mr. West as at
	the effective date of termination; and (f) subject to our then
	Option Plan and the rules and policies of any regulatory authority
	and stock exchange having jurisdiction over us, allow Mr.
	West’s estate to then exercise any unexercised and fully
	vested portion of stock options on the effective date of
	termination at any time during three months from the effective date
	of termination.
	 
	If we elect to terminate the West Agreement without just cause, and
	provided that Mr. West is in compliance with the relevant terms and
	conditions of the West Agreement, we shall be obligated to provide
	a severance package to Mr. West as follows: (a) if the effective
	date of termination occurs within the first year of the West
	Agreement, a cash payment equating to an aggregate of nine
	month’s base salary, less any required statutory deductions,
	if any; (b) if the effective date of termination occurs after the
	first year but before November 1, 2019, a cash payment equating to
	an aggregate of twelve month’s base salary, less any required
	statutory deductions, if any; (c) if the effective date of
	termination occurs after November 1, 2019 and during any renewal
	period during the continuance of the West Agreement, a cash payment
	equating to the greater of (i) twelve month’s base salary,
	less any required statutory deductions, if any, and (ii) $100,000;
	(d) any outstanding commissions, less any required statutory
	deductions, if any; (e) that portion of any then declared and/or
	earned or accrued bonus, prorated to the end of the three-month
	period from the effective date of termination that our President
	determines would likely have been paid to Mr. West; (f) the present
	value, as determined by us, acting reasonably, of each of the
	Individual Benefits that would have been enjoyed by Mr. West during
	the next six months from the effective date of termination; (g) the
	present value, as determined by us, acting reasonably, of each of
	the Group Benefits that would have been enjoyed by Mr. West during
	the next six months from the effective date of termination; (h) any
	outstanding vacation pay as at the effective date of termination;
	(i) any outstanding expenses owing to Mr. West as at the effective
	date of termination; (j) maintain Mr. West’s Individual
	Benefits for a period of six months from the effective date of
	termination; (k) maintain Mr. West’s Group Benefits for a
	period of six months from the effective date of termination; and
	(l) subject to our then Option Plan and the rules and policies of
	any regulatory authority and stock exchange having jurisdiction
	over us, allow Mr. West to then exercise any unexercised and fully
	vested portion of stock options on the effective date of
	termination at any time during three months from the effective date
	of termination.
	 
	Mr. West may terminate his employment under the West Agreement in
	connection with any change in control of us by providing not less
	than 90 calendar days’ notice in writing to us after the
	change in control has been effected; provided, however, that we may
	waive or abridge any notice period specified in such notice in our
	sole and absolute discretion. If Mr. West terminates his employment
	under the West Agreement as a consequence of a change in control of
	us, we will: (a) pay the total of (i) 12 months’ base salary,
	less any required statutory deductions, if any; (ii) any
	outstanding commissions, less any required statutory deductions, if
	any; (iii) that portion of any then declared and/or earned or
	accrued bonus, prorated to the end of the six-month period from the
	effective date of termination that our President determines would
	likely have been paid to Mr. West; (iv) the present value, as
	determined by us, acting reasonably, of each of the Individual
	Benefits that would have been enjoyed by Mr. West during the next
	six months from the effective date of termination assuming Mr.
	West’s employment was not terminated and assuming the then
	currently level of Individual Benefits were continued for that six
	months; (v) the present value, as determined by us, acting
	reasonably, of each of the Group Benefits that would have been
	enjoyed by Mr. West during the next six months from the effective
	date of termination assuming Mr. West’s employment was not
	terminated and assuming the then currently level of Group Benefits
	were continued for that six months; (vi) any outstanding vacation
	pay as at the effective date of termination; (vii) any outstanding
	expenses owing to Mr. West as at the effective date of termination;
	(b) maintain Mr. West’s Individual Benefits for a period of
	six months from the effective date of termination; (c) maintain Mr.
	West’s Group Benefits for a period of six months from the
	effective date of termination; and (d) subject to our then Option
	Plan and the rules and policies of any regulatory authority and
	stock exchange having jurisdiction over us, allow Mr. West to then
	exercise any unexercised and fully vested portion of stock options
	on the effective date of termination at any time during three
	months from the effective date of termination.
	 
	46
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Stock Option Plans and Stock Options
	 
	 
	The
	following table sets forth, as at December 31, 2017, the equity
	compensation plans pursuant to which equity securities of the
	Company may be issued:
	 
| 
	Plan
	Category
 | 
	 
	Number of securities
	to
	 
	be issued upon
	exercise
	 
	of outstanding
	options,
	 
	warrants and
	rights
	 (a)
 | 
	 
	Weighted-average
	 
	exercise price of
	 
	outstanding options,
	 
	warrants and rights
	($)
	 (b)
 | 
	 
	Number of securities
	 
	remaining available
	for
	 
	future issuance
	under
	 
	equity
	compensation
	 
	plans
	(excluding
	 
	securities
	reflected in
	 
	column
	(a))
	 (c)
 | 
| 
	Equity compensation
	plans approved by securityholders
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Equity compensation
	plans not approved by securityholders
 | 
	 
	 
	57,197,500
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	0.20
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	2,802,500
	 
 | 
| 
	Total
 | 
	 
	 
	57,197,500
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	0.20
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	2,802,500
	 
 | 
 
	 
	2015 Stock Option Plan
	 
	On June
	11, 2015, our Board of Directors adopted the 2015 Stock Option Plan
	(the “Stock Option Plan”) under which an aggregate of
	60,000,000 shares may be issued, subject to adjustment as described
	in the Stock Option Plan.
	As at
	December 31, 2017, there were 57,197,500 outstanding options under
	the Stock Option Plan leaving an additional 2,802,500 options to
	acquire
	common
	shares that may
	be granted under the Stock Option Plan.
	 
	The
	purpose of the Stock Option Plan is to retain the services of
	valued key employees, directors and consultants of the Company and
	such other persons as the plan administrator, which is currently
	the Board of Directors, shall select in accordance with the
	eligibility requirements of the Stock Option Plan, and to encourage
	such persons to acquire a greater proprietary interest in the
	Company, thereby strengthening their incentive to achieve the
	objectives of the shareholders of the Company, and to serve as an
	aid and inducement in the hiring of new employees and to provide an
	equity incentive to consultants and other persons selected by the
	plan administrator. The Stock Option Plan shall be administered
	initially by the Board of Directors of the Company, except that the
	Board may, in its discretion, establish a committee composed of two
	(2) or more members of the Board to administer the Stock Option
	Plan, which committee may be an executive, compensation or other
	committee, including a separate committee especially created for
	this purpose.
	 
	Unless
	accelerated in accordance with the Stock Option Plan, unvested
	options shall terminate immediately upon the optionee resigning
	from or the Company terminating the optionee’s employment or
	contractual relationship with the Company or any related company
	for any reason whatsoever, including death or disability. Options
	that have vested shall terminate, to the extent not previously
	exercised, upon the occurrence of the first of the following
	events: (i) the expiration of the option as designated by the plan
	administrator; (ii) the date of an optionee’s termination of
	employment or contractual relationship with the Company or any
	related company for cause (as determined in the sole discretion of
	the plan administrator); (iii) the expiration of three (3) months
	from the date of an optionee’s termination of employment or
	contractual relationship with the Company or any related company
	for any reason whatsoever other than cause, death or disability; or
	(iv) the expiration of three (3) months from termination of an
	optionee’s employment or contractual relationship by reason
	of death or disability. Upon the death of an optionee, any vested
	options held by the optionee shall be exercisable only by the
	person or persons to whom such optionee’s rights under such
	option shall pass by the optionee’s will or by the laws of
	descent and distribution of the optionee’s domicile at the
	time of death and only until such options terminate as provided
	above. For purposes of the Stock Option Plan, unless otherwise
	defined in the stock option agreement between the Company and the
	optionee, “disability” shall mean medically
	determinable physical or mental impairment which has lasted or can
	be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than six
	(6) months or that can be expected to result in death. The plan
	administrator shall determine whether an optionee has incurred a
	disability on the basis of medical evidence acceptable to the plan
	administrator. Upon making a determination of disability, the plan
	administrator shall, for purposes of the Stock Option Plan,
	determine the date of an optionee’s termination of employment
	or contractual relationship.
	 
	The
	foregoing summary of the Stock Option Plan is not complete and is
	qualified in its entirety by reference to the Stock Option Plan,
	which is filed as Exhibit 99.1 to our registration statement on
	Form F-1 under the U.S. Securities Act, as filed with the SEC on
	October 11, 2016 and is incorporated by reference
	herein.
	 
	 
	47
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Incentive Plan Awards
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 
	Option–based Awards
 
	 
 | 
| 
	Named Executive Officer
 
	or Director
 | 
	 
 
	Number of securities
	 
	underlying
 
	unexercised options
	 
	(#)
 | 
	 
 
	Option
	 
	exercise
	price
	 
	(US$)
 | 
	Option
	 
	expiration
	date
 | 
| 
	 
 
	Jerry
	Kroll 
	President, Chief
	Executive Officer and a director
 | 
	45,000,000
 
	5,000,000
 
	10,000 
 
 | 
	 
 
	$0.15
 
	$0.40
 
	$1.00
 
	 
 | 
	June
	11, 2022
 
	Dec. 9,
	2022
 
	Feb.
	17, 2024
 
	 
 | 
| 
	Kulwant
	Sandher 
	Chief Financial
	Officer and Secretary
 | 
	250,000 
 
	 
 | 
	$1.00 
 
	 
 | 
	Feb.
	17, 2024
 
	 
 | 
| 
	Iain
	Ball 
	Vice-President,
	Finance
 | 
	500,000
 
	750,000
 
	10,000 
 
	 
 | 
	$0.15
 
	$0.40
 
	$1.00 
 
	 
 | 
	Aug.
	13, 2022
 
	Dec. 9,
	2022
 
	Feb.
	17, 2024
 
	 
 | 
| 
	Henry
	Reisner 
	Chief Operating
	Officer
 | 
	1,250,000
 
	1,250,000
 
	10,000
 
	 
 | 
	$0.15
 
	$0.40
 
	$1.00
 
	 
 | 
	Aug.
	13, 2022
 
	Dec. 9,
	2022
 
	Feb.
	17, 2024
 
	 
 | 
| 
	Ed
	Theobald 
	General
	Manager
 | 
	500,000
 
	750,000
 
	10,000
 
	 
 | 
	$0.15
 
	$0.40
 
	1.00
 
	 
 | 
	Aug.
	13, 2022
 
	Dec. 9,
	2022
 
	Feb.
	17, 2024
 
	 
 | 
| 
	Mark
	West 
	Vice-President, Sales
	& Dealerships
 | 
	225,000 
 
	 
 | 
	$1.00 
 
	 
 | 
	Feb.
	17, 2024
 
	 
 | 
| 
	Shaun
	Greffard
 
	Director
 | 
	50,000
 
	25,000
 
	250,000
 
	 
 | 
	$0.15
 
	$0.40
 
	$1.00 
 
	 
 | 
	Aug.
	13, 2022
 
	Dec. 9,
	2022
 
	Feb.
	17, 2024
 
	 
 | 
| 
	Robert
	Tarzwell
 
	Director
 | 
	25,000
 
	5,000
 
	 
 | 
	$0.15
 
	$1.00 
 
	 
 | 
	Aug.
	13, 2022
 
	Feb.
	17, 2024
 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	Incentive Plan Awards
	 
	 
	The
	following table provides information concerning the incentive award
	plans of the Company with respect to each Named Executive Officer
	during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. The only incentive
	award plan of the Company during such fiscal year was the Stock
	Option Plan:
	 
| 
	Named
	Executive Officer
 
	and
	Director
 | 
	 
	Option-based Awards
	– Value Vested During the
	Year ($)(1)
	 
 | 
	Non-Equity Incentive
	Plan
	 
	Compensation
	– Value Vested
	 
	During the Year
	 
	($)
 | 
| 
	Jerry
	Kroll 
	President and Chief
	Executive Officer
 | 
	 
	$
	80,139,063
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | 
| 
	Kulwant
	Sandher 
	Chief Financial
	Officer and Secretary
 | 
	 
	$
	523,699
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | 
| 
	Iain
	Ball 
	Vice-President,
	Finance
 | 
	 
	$
	1,964,414
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | 
| 
	Henry
	Reisner 
	Chief Operating
	Officer
 | 
	 
	$
	3,944,453
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | 
| 
	Ed
	Theobald 
	General
	Manager
 | 
	 
	$
	1,964,414
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | 
| 
	Mark
	West 
	Vice-President, Sales
	& Dealerships
 | 
	 
	$
	366,589
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | 
| 
	Shaun
	Greffard
	,
	Director
 | 
	 
	$
	40,226
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | 
| 
	Robert
	Tarzwell
	,
	Director
 | 
	 
	$
	119,115
	 
 | 
	Nil
 | 
 
	 
| 
	(1)
 | 
	The
	amount represents the aggregate dollar value that would have been
	realized if the options had been exercised on the vesting date,
	based on the difference between US$5.25, the last closing price of
	our shares on the OTCQB for the year ended December 31, 2017, and
	the exercise price of the options, multiplied by the number of
	options that have vested
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	48
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Director Compensation for Fiscal 2017
	 
	Prior to March 2018, including for our fiscal year ended December
	31, 2017, our Board of Directors acted as a compensation committee.
	The Board as a whole made the final determination in respect of
	compensation matters. Remuneration was assessed and determined by
	taking into account such factors as our size and the level of
	compensation earned by directors and officers of companies of
	comparable size and industry.
	 
	The only arrangements we have, standard or otherwise, pursuant to
	which directors were compensated by us for their services in their
	capacity as directors, or for committee participation, involvement
	in special assignments or for services as consultants or experts
	for the financial year ended December 31, 2017, was through the
	issuance of stock options. The number of options to be granted from
	time to time is determined by the Board in its
	discretion.
	 
	During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, there were three
	directors, Jerry Kroll, Shaun Greffard and Robert Tarzwell. Mr.
	Kroll’s compensation information is reported in the Summary
	Compensation Table for Named Executive Officers above.
	 
	We reimburse out-of-pocket costs that are incurred by the
	directors. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries has entered into
	a service contract with any director providing for benefits upon
	termination of such office.
	 
	In March 2018, our Board of Directors appointed a Compensation
	Committee to assess the appropriate level of remuneration for our
	directors and officers.
	 
	Pension Benefits
	 
	We do
	not have any defined benefit pension plans or any other plans
	providing for retirement payments or benefits.
	 
	Termination of Employment and Change of Control
	Benefits
	 
	Details
	with respect to termination of employment and change of control
	benefits for our directors and executive officers is reported above
	under the section titled “
	Executive Compensation
	Agreements
	.”
	 
	C. 
	Board
	Practices
	 
	Board of Directors
	 
	Our Notice of Articles and Articles are attached as exhibits to the
	registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. The
	Articles of the Company provide that the number of directors is set
	at:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(a)
 | 
	subject
	to paragraphs (b) and (c), the number of directors that is equal to
	the number of our first directors;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(b)
 | 
	if we
	are a public company, the greater of three and the number most
	recently elected by ordinary resolution (whether or not previous
	notice of the resolution was given); and
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(c)
 | 
	if we
	are not a public company, the number most recently elected by
	ordinary resolution (whether or not previous notice of the
	resolution was given).
 | 
 
	 
	Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) currently consists
	of six directors. Our directors are elected annually at each annual
	meeting of our company’s shareholders. The Board assesses
	potential Board candidates to fill perceived needs on the Board for
	required skills, expertise, independence and other
	factors.
	 
	Our Board of Directors is responsible for appointing our
	company’s officers.
	 
	Board Committees
	 
	Our Board of Directors currently has six committees, the Audit
	Committee, the Nominating Committee, the Corporate Governance and
	Human Resources Committee, the Compensation Committee, the
	Enterprise Risk Oversight Committee and the Social Media
	Committee.
	 
	49
	 
	 
	 
	Audit Committee
	 
	Our Audit Committee consists of Luisa Ingagiola, Steven Sanders,
	Robert Trazwell and Shaun Greffard and is chaired by Luisa
	Ingagiola. Each member of the Audit Committee satisfies the
	“independence” requirements of Rule 5605(a)(2) of the
	Listing Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market and meet the independence
	standards under Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. Our audit
	committee will consist solely of independent directors that satisfy
	the Nasdaq and SEC requirements within one year of the completion
	of this offering. Our Audit Committee Financial Expert is Robert
	Tarzwell who qualifies as an “audit committee financial
	expert” within the meaning of the SEC rules and possesses
	financial sophistication within the meaning of the Listing Rules of
	the NASDAQ Stock Market. The audit committee will oversee our
	accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of the
	financial statements of our company. The audit committee will be
	responsible for, among other things:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	selecting
	our independent registered public accounting firm
	and pre-approving all auditing
	and non-auditing services permitted to be performed by
	our independent registered public accounting firm;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	reviewing
	with our independent registered public accounting firm any audit
	problems or difficulties and management’s response and
	approving all proposed related party transactions, as defined in
	Item 404 of Regulation S-K;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	discussing
	the annual audited financial statements with management and our
	independent registered public accounting firm;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	annually
	reviewing and reassessing the adequacy of our audit committee
	charter;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	meeting
	separately and periodically with the management and our internal
	auditor and our independent registered public accounting
	firm;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	reporting
	regularly to the full board of directors;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	reviewing
	the adequacy and effectiveness of our accounting and internal
	control policies and procedures and any steps taken to monitor and
	control major financial risk exposure; and
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	such
	other matters that are specifically delegated to our audit
	committee by our board of directors from time to time.
 | 
 
	 
	Nominating Committee
	 
	Our Nominating Committee consists of Steven Sanders and Robert
	Trazwell and is chaired by Jerry Kroll. The nominating committee is
	responsible for overseeing the selection of persons to be nominated
	to serve on our board of directors. The nominating committee
	considers persons identified by its members, management,
	shareholders, investment bankers and others.
	 
	Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee
	 
	Our Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee consists of
	Steven Sanders, Luisa Ingagiola, Robert Trazwell and Shaun Greffard
	and is chaired by Steven Sanders. The Corporate Governance and
	Human Resources Committee shall be responsible for developing our
	approach to the Board and corporate governance issues; helping to
	maintain an effective working relationship between the Board and
	management; exercising, within the limits imposed by the by-laws of
	the Company, by applicable laws, and by the Board, the powers of
	the Board for the management and direction of the affairs of the
	Company during the intervals between meetings of the Board;
	reviewing and making recommendations to the Board for the
	appointment of senior executives of the Company and for considering
	their terms of employment; reviewing succession planning, matters
	of compensation; recommending awards under the Company’s long
	term and short term incentive plans; assuming the role of
	administrator, whether by delegation or by statute, for the
	corporate-sponsored registered pension plans and the Supplementary
	Executive Retirement Plan of the Company and its wholly-owned
	subsidiaries and any future, additional or replacement plans
	relating to the plans; and monitoring the investment performance of
	the trust funds for the plans and compliance with applicable
	legislation and investment policies.
	 
	Our Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee shall also
	review any “red flags” or issues that may arise out of
	the Compensation Committee compensation and award recommendations
	and report them to the Board of Directors. The Compensation
	Committee and Governance Committee, at times, may be collaborative
	but will not coordinate as the process is intended to be a
	“checks and balance” approach. It is being set up as an
	internal control mechanism that would safeguard against fraud and
	errors due to omission
	 
	50
	 
	 
	 
	Compensation Committee
	 
	Our Compensation Committee consists of Luisa Ingagiola, Steven
	Sanders and Robert Trazwell and is chaired by Luisa Ingagiola. Each
	of the Compensation Committee members satisfies the
	“independence” requirements of Rule 5605(a)(2) of
	the Listing Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Our compensation
	committee will assist the board in reviewing and approving the
	compensation structure, including all forms of compensation,
	relating to our directors and executive officers. No officer may be
	present at any committee meeting during which such officer’s
	compensation is deliberated upon. The compensation committee will
	be responsible for, among other things:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	reviewing
	and approving to the board with respect to the total compensation
	package for our most senior executive officers;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	approving
	and overseeing the total compensation package for our executives
	other than the most senior executive officers;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	reviewing
	and recommending to the board with respect to the compensation of
	our directors;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	reviewing
	periodically and approving any long-term incentive compensation or
	equity plans;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	selecting
	compensation consultants, legal counsel or other advisors after
	taking into consideration all factors relevant to that
	person’s independence from management; and
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	programs
	or similar arrangements, annual bonuses, employee pension and
	welfare benefit plans.
 | 
 
	 
	Enterprise Risk Oversight Committee
	 
	Our Enterprise Risk Oversight Committee consists of Steven Sanders,
	Luisa Ingagiola, Robert Trazwell and Shaun Greffard and is chaired
	by Steven Sanders. The Enterprise Risk Oversight Committee shall
	oversee the effectiveness of risk management policies, procedures
	and practices implemented by management of the Corporation with
	respect to strategic, operational, environmental, health and
	safety, human resources, legal and compliance and other risks faced
	by the Corporation. The committee shall:
	 
	●
	review
	executive management’s assessment of the company’s
	material risk exposures and the company’s actions to
	identify, monitor and mitigate such exposures,
 
 
	 
	● 
	review
	executive management’s implementation of systems and controls
	designed to promote compliance with applicable legal and regulatory
	requirements and
 
 
	 
	●
	report
	to the Board on an annual basis with respect to the
	committee’s review of the company’s material risks and
	measures in place to mitigate them, and at least annually in
	respect of the committee’s other activities.
 
 
	 
	Social Media Committee
	 
	Our
	Social Media Committee consists of Jerry Kroll, Robert Trazwell,
	Shaun Greffard and Henry Reisner and is chaired by Jerry Kroll. The
	Social Media Committee shall oversee the social media strategy
	initiatives for the Company pursuant to Regulation FD. The Social
	Media Committee shall:
	 
	●
	provide compliant
	Regulation FD strategic leadership for social media through the
	alignment of social media strategies and activities with enterprise
	strategic objectives and processes;
 
 
	 
	●
	establish and
	maintain corporate policies with respect to use of social media for
	both process-driven social engagements, as well as for use of
	social media by employees for participating in social conversations
	(e.g. blogging and Tweeting by subject matter
	experts);
 
 
	 
	●
	prioritize social
	media initiatives and deliver final approvals and recommendations
	on proceeding with proposed social media projects, including
	process, technology, and organizational project;
 
 
	 
	●
	ensure open
	communication between the social media department and the other
	functional units of the Company so as to promote collaborative
	strategies, planning, and implementation.
 
 
	 
	51
	 
	 
	 
	D. 
	Employees
	 
	As of
	April 11,
	2018, we
	employed a total of 44 full-time and
	no
	part-time people at our principal executive
	offices in Vancouver, British Columbia. None of our employees are
	covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
	 
	The breakdown of employees by main category of activity is as
	follows:
	 
| 
	Activity
 |  | 
| 
	Engineering/R&D
 | 
	 
	 
	29
	 
 | 
| 
	Sales &
	Marketing
 | 
	 
	 
	4
	 
 | 
| 
	General &
	Administration
 | 
	 
	 
	5
	 
 | 
| 
	Executives
 | 
	 
	 
	6
	 
 | 
 
	 
	E. 
	Share
	Ownership
	 
	Shares
	 
	The
	shareholdings of our officers and directors are set out in Item 7
	below.
	 
	Options
	 
	The
	stock options, exercisable into common shares of the Company, held
	by our officers and directors are set out in Item 6 B
	above.
	 
	Warrants
	 
	Warrants,
	exercisable into common shares of the Company, held by our officers
	and directors are set forth below as of April 11,
	2018.
	 
| 
	Name
 | 
	Position
 | 
	Allotment
	 
	date
 | 
	Expiration
	 
	date
 |  |  | 
| 
	Jerry
	Kroll
 | 
	President, CEO and
	Director
 | 
	Jun. 15,
	2015 Jan. 26, 2016
 | 
	Jun. 15,
	2020 Jan. 26, 2021
 | 
	 
	$
	0.40$1.00
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	50,000125,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Iain
	Ball
 | 
	Vice-President,
	Finance
 | 
	Aug 19,
	2015
 | 
	Aug. 19,
	2020
 | 
	 
	$
	1.00
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	62,500
	 
 | 
| 
	Robert
	Tarzwell
 | 
	Director
 | 
	Jun. 26,
	2015
 | 
	Jun. 26,
	2020
 | 
	 
	$
	0.40
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	375,000
	(1)
 | 
| 
	Mark
	West
 | 
	Vice-President,
	Sales & Dealerships
 | 
	Dec. 1,
	2015
 | 
	Dec. 1,
	2020
 | 
	 
	$
	1.00
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	15,500
	 
 | 
 
	 
| 
	Notes:
 | 
| 
	(1)
 | 
	Mr.
	Tarzwell hold 187,500 warrants directly and 187,500 warrants
	registered to Robert Tarzwell M.D. Inc.
 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	52
	 
	 
	 
	 
	ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY
	TRANSACTIONS
	 
	A. 
	Major
	Shareholders
	 
	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
	Management
	 
	The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
	beneficial ownership of our common share as of
	April 11,
	2018 by (a) each stockholder who is
	known to us to own beneficially 5% or more of our outstanding
	common share; (b) all directors; (c) our executive officers, and
	(d) all executive officers and directors as a group. Except as
	otherwise indicated, all persons listed below have (i) sole voting
	power and investment power with respect to their
	common
	shares, except to the extent that
	authority is shared by spouses under applicable law, and (ii)
	record and beneficial ownership with respect to their
	common
	shares.
	 
| 
	Name
 | 
	 
	 
 
	Common
	Shares of the Company Beneficially Owned (1)
 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
 
	Percentage
	of Common Shares Beneficially Owned (2)
 
	 
 | 
| 
	Directors and Executive Officers:
 |  |  | 
| 
	Jerry
	Kroll Vancouver,
	President,
	CEO and a director
 | 
	 
	 
	50,058,324
	(3)
 | 
	 
	 
	61.0
	%
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Iain
	Ball Vancouver,
	Vice-President, Finance
 | 
	 
	 
	843,749
	(4)
 | 
	 
	 
	1.7
	%
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Henry
	Reisner, 
	COO
 | 
	 
	 
	7,508,331
	(5)
 | 
	 
	 
	14.8
	%
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Kulwant
	Sandher, 
	CFO
 |  | 
	  
	  Nil
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Ed
	Theobald Vancouver, 
	General Manager
 | 
	 
	 
	1,218,749
	(6)
 | 
	 
	 
	2.4
	%
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Shaun
	Greffard Surrey, 
	Director
 | 
	 
	 
	44,789
	(7)
 | 
	 
	 
	*
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Robert
	Tarzwell, 
	Director
 | 
	 
	 
	765,623
	(8)
 | 
	 
	 
	1.5
	%
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Mark West, 
	Vice-President, Sales &
	Dealerships
 | 
	 
	 
	101,313
	(9)
 | 
	 
	 
	*
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Directors
	and Executive Officers as a Group (Eight Persons)
 | 
	 
	 
	60,540,878
	(10)
 | 
	 
	 
	70.8
	%
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Other 5% or more Shareholders:
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Megan
	Martin 
 | 
	 
	 
	5,400,000
	(11)
 | 
	 
	 
	10.0
	%
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Yuan Sheng
	Zhang 
 | 
	 
	 
	5,400,000
	(12)
 | 
	 
	 
	10.0
	%
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Shang Wen
	Yang
 | 
	 
	 
	4,000,000
	(13)
 | 
	 
	 
	7.8
	%
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Unison
	International Holdings Ltd. 
 | 
	 
	 
	6,400,000
	(14)
 | 
	 
	 
	12.0
	%
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Zongshen (Canada)
	Environtech Ltd. 
 | 
	 
	 
	5,600,000
	(15)
 | 
	 
	 
	10.8
	%
 | 
 
	 
| 
	*
 | 
	Less
	than 1%.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(1)
 | 
	Under
	Rule 13d–3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any
	person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract,
	arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or
	shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to
	direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which
	includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares.
	Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than
	one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the
	power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to
	be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to
	acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within
	60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In
	computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of
	shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares
	beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason
	of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of
	outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not
	necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting
	power with respect to the number of common shares actually
	outstanding on April 11, 2018.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(2)
 | 
	The
	percentage is calculated based on
	49,119,449
	common shares that were
	outstanding as of April 11, 2018.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(3)
 | 
	This
	figure consists of (i) 7,175,000 common
	shares
	registered directly to Jerry Kroll,
	(ii) 10,000,000 common
	shares
	registered to Ascend Sportmanagement Inc., which Mr. Kroll has
	discretionary voting and investment authority over securities held
	by Ascend Sportmanagement Inc., (iii) 175,000 common
	shares
	issuable upon exercise of warrants
	registered directly to Mr. Kroll, (iv) 30,625,000 stock options to
	purchase 30,625,000 shares of our common share which have vested,
	and (v) 2,083,332 stock options to purchase 2,083,332 shares of our
	common share which will vest within 60 days of April 11,
	2018.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(4)
 | 
	This
	figure consists of (i) 62,500 common
	shares
	registered directly to Iain Ball,
	(ii) 62,500 common
	shares
	issuable upon exercise of warrants registered directly to Mr. Ball,
	(iii) 666,667 stock options to purchase 666,667 shares of our
	common share which have vested, and (iv) 52,082 stock options to
	purchase 52,082 shares of our common share which will vest within
	60 days of April 11, 2018.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(5)
 | 
	This
	figure consists of (i) 4,750,000 common
	shares
	registered directly to Henry
	Reisner, (ii) 1,050,000 common
	shares
	held of record by Mr.
	Reisner’s wife, (iii) 250,000 common
	shares
	held of record by Mr.
	Reisner’s daughter, (iv) 1,354,167 stock options to purchase
	1,354,167 shares of our common share which have vested, and (v)
	104,164 stock options to purchase 104,164 shares of our common
	share which will vest within 60 days of April 11,
	2018.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(6)
 | 
	This
	figure consists of (i) 500,000 common
	shares
	registered directly to Ed Theobald,
	(ii) 666,667 stock options to purchase 666,667 shares of our common
	share which have vested, and (iii) 52,082 stock options to purchase
	52,082 shares of our common share which will vest within 60 days of
	April 11, 2018.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(7)
 | 
	This
	figure consists of (i) 41,667 stock options to purchase 41,667
	shares of our common share which have vested, and (ii) 3,122 stock
	options to purchase 3,122 shares of our common share which will
	vest within 60 days of April 11, 2018.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(8)
 | 
	This
	figure consists of (i) 187,500 common
	shares
	registered directly to Robert
	Tarzwell, (ii) 187,500 common
	shares
	held of record by Robert Tarzwell
	M.D. Inc., which Mr. Tarzwell has discretionary voting and
	investment authority over such securities, (iii) 187,500 common
	shares
	issuable upon exercise
	of warrants registered directly to Mr. Tarzwell, (iv) 187,500
	common
	shares
	issuable upon
	exercise of warrants held of record by Robert Tarzwell M.D. Inc.,
	(v) 14,583 stock options to purchase 14,583 shares of our common
	share which have vested, and (vi) 1,040 stock options to purchase
	1,040 shares of our common share which will vest within 60 days of
	January ,25 2018.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(9)
 | 
	This
	figure consists of (i) 15,500 common
	shares
	registered directly to Mark West,
	(ii) 15,500 common
	shares
	issuable upon exercise of warrants registered directly to Mr. West,
	(iii) 60,938 stock options to purchase 60.938 shares of our common
	share which have vested, and (iv) 9,375 stock options to purchase
	9,375 common shares which will vest within 60 days of April 11,
	2018.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(10)
 | 
	This
	figure consists of (i) 24,178,000 common
	shares and
	(ii) 36,362,878 of common shares
	underlying warrants and stock options which have vested or will
	vest within 60 days of April 11, 2018.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(11)
 | 
	This
	figure consists of (i) 1,250,000 common
	shares
	registered directly to Megan Martin,
	(ii) 1,250,000 common
	shares
	held of record by Ms. Martin’s husband, Yuan Sheng Zhang,
	(iii) 200,000 common
	shares
	held of record by Ms. Martin’s son, Bo Hong Zhang, (iv)
	1,250,000 common
	shares
	issuable upon exercise of warrants registered directly to Ms.
	Martin, (v) 1,250,000 common
	shares
	issuable upon exercise of warrants
	held of record by Ms. Martin’s husband, and (vi) 200,000
	common
	shares
	issuable upon
	exercise of warrants held of record by Ms. Martin’s
	son.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(12)
 | 
	This
	figure consists of (i) 1,250,000 common
	shares
	registered directly to Yuan Sheng
	Zhang, (ii) 1,250,000 common
	shares
	held of record by Mr. Zhang’s
	wife, Megan Martin, (iii) 200,000 common
	shares
	held of record by Mr. Zhang’s
	son, Bo Hong Zhang, (iv) 1,250,000 common
	shares
	issuable upon exercise of warrants
	registered directly to Mr. Zhang, (v) 1,250,000 common
	shares
	issuable upon exercise of warrants
	held of record by Mr. Zhang’s wife, and (vi) 200,000 common
	shares
	issuable upon exercise
	of warrants held of record by Mr. Zhang’s son.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(13)
 | 
	This
	figure consists of (i) 2,000,000 common
	shares
	registered directly to Shang Wen
	Yang and (ii) 2,000,000 common
	shares
	issuable upon exercise of warrants
	registered directly to Cheng Qun Sang.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(14)
 | 
	This
	figure consists of (i) 2,400,000 common
	shares
	registered to Unison International
	Holdings Ltd. and (ii) 4,000,000 common
	shares
	issuable upon exercise of warrants
	registered to Unison International Holdings Ltd. Mr. Ping Hui Lu is
	the President of Unison International Holdings Ltd. and has
	discretionary voting and investment authority over securities held
	by Unison International Holdings Ltd.
 
	 
 | 
| 
	(15)
 | 
	This
	figure consists of (i) 2,800,000 common
	shares
	registered to Zongshen (Canada)
	Environtech Ltd. and (ii) 2,800,000 common
	shares
	issuable upon exercise of warrants
	registered to Zongshen (Canada) Environtech Ltd. Mr. Daxue Zhang is
	the sole director of Zongshen (Canada) Environtech Ltd. and has
	discretionary voting and investment authority over securities held
	by Zongshen (Canada) Environtech Ltd.
 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	The information as to shares beneficially owned, not being within
	our knowledge, has been furnished by the officers and
	directors.
	 
	As at April 6, 2018, there were 98 holders of record of our
	common
	shares. Approximately nine
	registered holders have mailing addresses in the United States and
	together hold approximately 944,000
	common
	shares, which constitutes approximately 2% of our
	issued and outstanding
	common
	shares as of April 6, 2018.
	 
	53
	 
	 
	 
	Transfer Agent
	 
	Our
	shares of common stock are recorded in registered form on the books
	of our transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services Inc.,
	located at 3
	rd
	 Floor, 510
	Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C
	3B9.
	 
	B. 
	Related Party
	Transactions
	 
	Jerry Kroll
	 
	On
	October 16, 2017, Jerry Kroll, our President and CEO, entered into
	a Share Pledge Agreement with Zongshen to guarantee our payment for
	the cost of the prototype tooling and molds estimated to be $1.8
	million through the pledge of 800,000 common shares of the Company
	at a deemed price of USD $2.00. We have agreed to reimburse Mr.
	Kroll on a one-for-one basis for any pledged shares realized by
	Zongshen at a deemed issue price of $2.00 per common
	share.
	 
	From February 16, 2015 to November 13, 2015, Mr. Kroll provided us
	with a loans in the aggregate amount of $185,000. These loans were
	unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. No formal
	written agreements regarding these loans were signed, however, they
	are documented in our accounting records. On January 20, 2016, we
	repaid $135,000 of these loans and $50,000 was repaid through the
	issuance of 125,000 post-subdivision units at a price of $0.40 per
	unit.
	 
	On February 16, 2015, Mr. Kroll acquired 7,000,000 common shares
	and Ascend Sportmanagement Inc., a corporation under the control
	and direction of Mr. Kroll, acquired 10,000,000 common shares at a
	price of $0.0002 per common share pursuant to a private placement.
	In addition, on June 15, 2015, Mr. Kroll acquired 50,000 units at a
	price of $0.20 per unit pursuant to a private placement. Each unit
	consisted of one common share and one common share purchase
	warrant. Each warrant is exercisable for one additional common
	share at a price of $0.40 per common share until June 15, 2020.
	Furthermore, on January 22, 2016, Mr. Kroll acquired 125,000 units
	at a price of $0.40 per unit pursuant to a private placement. Each
	unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase
	warrant. Each warrant is exercisable for one additional common
	share at a price of $1.00 per common share until January 22,
	2021.
	 
	On June 11, 2015 we granted 45,000,000 stock options to Mr. Kroll
	having an exercise price of $0.15 per common share until June 11,
	2022. In addition, on December 9, 2015 we granted 5,000,000 stock
	options to Mr. Kroll having an exercise price of $0.40 per common
	share until December 9, 2022. Furthermore, on February 17, 2017 we
	granted 10,000 stock options to Mr. Kroll having an exercise price
	of $1.00 per common share until February 17, 2024.
	 
	Henry Reisner
	 
	On
	October 18, 2017, we entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the
	“SPA”) to acquire Intermeccanica with Henry Reisner,
	our Chief Operating Officer, and two members of his family, which
	replaced a prior Joint Operating Agreement. Under the SPA, we
	agreed to purchase all the shares of Intermeccanica for $2,500,000,
	$300,000 of which had been previously paid under the Joint
	Operating Agreement. At closing, we paid the sellers $700,000 and
	issued a Note for the balance of $1,500,000. On January 28, 2018,
	we paid off all of the principal and interest due on the Note for
	$1,520,548.
	 
	On February 16, 2015, Mr. Henry Reisner acquired 4,750,000 common
	shares at a price of $0.0002 per common share pursuant to a private
	placement. Mr. Reisner’s wife and daughter acquired 1,050,000
	common share s and 250,000 common shares, respectively, at a price
	of $0.0002 per common share pursuant to a private
	placement.
	 
	On July 15, 2015, as amended on September 19, 2016, we entered into
	a Joint Operating Agreement with Intermeccanica and Henry Reisner
	which is comprised of three underlying agreements. The Joint
	Operating Agreement was terminated upon the entry into the
	SPA.
	 
	On August 13, 2015, we granted 1,250,000 stock options to Mr.
	Reisner having an exercise price of $0.15 per common share until
	August 13, 2022. In addition, on December 9, 2015, we granted
	1,250,000 stock options to Mr. Reisner having an exercise price of
	$0.40 per common share until December 9, 2022. Furthermore, on
	February 17, 2017, we granted 10,000 stock options to Mr. Reisner
	having an exercise price of $1.00 per common share until February
	17, 2024.
	 
	54
	 
	 
	 
	Iain Ball
	 
	On August 13, 2015, we granted 500,000 stock option to Iain Ball
	having an exercise price of $0.15 per common share until August 13,
	2022. In addition on December 9, 2015, we granted 750,000 stock
	options to Mr. Ball having an exercise price of $0.40 per common
	share until December 9, 2022. Furthermore, on February 17, 2017 we
	granted 10,000 stock options to Mr. Ball having an exercise price
	of $1.00 per common share until February 17, 2024.
	 
	On August 19, 2015, Mr. Iain Ball acquired 62,500 units at a price
	of $0.40 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one
	common share purchase warrant. Each warrant is exercisable for one
	additional common share at a price of $1.00 per common share until
	August 19, 2020.
	 
	Kulwant Sandher
	 
	On February 17, 2017, we granted 250,000 stock options to Mr.
	Sandher having an exercise price of $1.00 per common share until
	February 17, 2024.
	 
	Ed Theobald
	 
	On February 16, 2015, Mr. Ed Theobald acquired 500,000 common
	shares at a price of $0.0002 per common share pursuant to a private
	placement.
	 
	On August 13, 2015, we granted 500,000 stock options to Mr.
	Theobald having an exercise price of $0.15 per common share until
	August 13, 2022. In addition on December 9, 2015, we granted
	750,000 stock options to Mr. Theobald having an exercise price of
	$0.40 per common share until December 9, 2022. Furthermore, on
	February 17, 2017 we granted 10,000 stock options to Mr. Theobald
	having an exercise price of $1.00 per common share until February
	17, 2024.
	 
	Shaun Greffard
	 
	On August 13, 2015, we granted 50,000 stock options to Mr. Sean
	Greffard having an exercise price of $0.15 per common share until
	August 13, 2022. In addition on December 9, 2015, we granted 25,000
	stock options to Mr. Greffard having an exercise price of $0.40 per
	common share until December 9, 2022. Furthermore, on February 17,
	2017 we granted 250,000 stock options to Mr. Greffard having an
	exercise price of $1.00 per common share until February 17,
	2024.
	 
	Robert Tarzwell
	 
	On June 26, 2015, Mr. Robert Tarzwell acquired 187,500 units and
	Robert Tarzwell M.D. Inc., a corporation under the control and
	direction of Mr. Tarzwell, acquired 187,500 units at a price of
	$0.20 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one
	common share purchase warrant. Each warrant is exercisable for one
	additional common share at a price of $0.40 per common share until
	June 26, 2020.
	 
	On August 13, 2015, we granted 25,000 stock options to Mr. Tarzwell
	having an exercise price of $0.15 per common share until August 13,
	2022. In addition, on February 17, 2017, we granted 5,000 stock
	options to Mr. Tarzwell having an exercise price of $1.00 per
	common share until February 17, 2024.
	 
	Mark West
	 
	On December 1, 2015, Mr. Mark West acquired 15,500 units at a price
	of $0.40 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one
	common share purchase warrant. Each warrant is exercisable for one
	additional common share at a price of $1.00 per common share until
	December 1, 2020.
	 
	On February 17, 2017, we granted 225,000 stock options to Mr. West
	having an exercise price of $1.00 per common share until February
	17, 2024.
	 
	Zongshen (Canada) Environtech Ltd.
	 
	On October 2, 2017, we announced a manufacturing agreement with
	Zongshen to produce 75,000 SOLO all-electric vehicles over the next
	three years. Zongshen is an entity under common control with
	Zongshen (Canada) Environtech Ltd., which is the beneficial owner
	of approximately 11.1% of our common shares. Specifically, the plan
	calls for the production of 5,000 SOLOs in 2018, 20,000 in 2019 and
	50,000 in 2020. Under the agreement the Company agrees to reimburse
	Zongshen for the cost of the prototype tooling and molds estimated
	to be $1.8 million, which shall be payable on or before March 18,
	2018, and the mass production tooling and molds estimated to be
	$6.0 million, which shall be payable 50% when Zongshen commences
	manufacturing the tooling and molds (which we expect will be in the
	second quarter of 2018), 40% when Zongshen completes manufacturing
	the tooling and molds (which we expect will be in the third quarter
	of 2018), and 10% upon delivery to the Company of the first
	production vehicle (which we expect will be in the third quarter of
	2018).
	 
	55
	 
	 
	 
	C. 
	Interests of
	Experts and Counsel
	 
	Not
	Applicable.
	 
	ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	 
	A. 
	Consolidated
	Statements and Other Financial Information
	 
	Financial Statements
	 
	The
	financial statements of the Company for the years ended December
	31, 2017 and 2016 have been prepared in accordance with IFRS, as
	issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB,
	and are included under Item 18 of this annual report. The financial
	statements including related notes are accompanied by the report of
	the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm,
	Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP.
	 
	Legal Proceedings
	 
	As of
	the date of this Annual Report, in the opinion of our management,
	we are not currently a party to any litigation or legal proceedings
	which are material, either individually or in the aggregate, and,
	to our knowledge, no legal proceedings of a material nature
	involving us currently are contemplated by any individuals,
	entities or governmental authorities.
	 
	Dividends
	 
	We have
	not paid any dividends on our common shares since incorporation.
	Our management anticipates that we will retain all future earnings
	and other cash resources for the future operation and development
	of our business. We do not intend to declare or pay any cash
	dividends in the foreseeable future. Payment of any future
	dividends will be at the Board’s discretion, subject to
	applicable law, after taking into account many factors including
	our operating results, financial condition and current and
	anticipated cash needs.
	 
	B. 
	Significant
	Changes
	 
	We have not experienced any significant changes since the date of
	the financial statements included with this Form 20-F except as
	disclosed in this Form 20-F.
	 
	ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
	 
	A. 
	Offer and
	Listing
	 
	On September 1, 2017, our common share began to be quoted on the
	OTC Market Group Inc.’s Venture Market (the
	“OTCQB”) under the symbol “ECCTF”.
	On
	April 11, 2018
	, the last
	reported sale price of our common share on the OTCQB was US$4.52
	per share, and on
	April 11, 2018,
	we had approximately
	49,119,449
	common
	shares outstanding. The market for our common
	shares is limited, volatile and sporadic. The following table sets
	forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low bid prices of
	our common shares on the OTCQB as reported by Google Finance. The
	following quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail
	mark-up, markdown, or commissions, and may not reflect actual
	transactions.
	 
| 
	Quarter ended
 |  |  | 
| 
	December
	31, 2017
 | 
	 
	$
	US 7.50
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	US 5.00
	 
 | 
| 
	March
	31, 2018
 | 
	 
	$
	US 5.35
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	US 4.50
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Month ended
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	October
	31, 2017
 | 
	 
	$
	US 7.50
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	US 6.20
	 
 | 
| 
	November
	30, 2017
 | 
	 
	$
	US 6.75
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	US 5.75
	 
 | 
| 
	December
	31, 2017
 | 
	 
	$
	US 7.50
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	US 5.00
	 
 | 
| 
	January
	31, 2018
 | 
	 
	$
	US 5.35
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	US 4.74
	 
 | 
| 
	February
	28, 2018
 | 
	 
	$
	US 5.00
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	US 4.56
	 
 | 
| 
	March
	31, 2018
 | 
	 
	$
	US 5.00
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	US 4.50
	 
 | 
 
	 
	We submitted our application for listing our common shares on the
	Nasdaq Capital Market on October 17, 2017.
	 
	56
	 
	 
	 
	 
	B. 
	Plan of
	Distribution
	 
	Not
	Applicable.
	 
	C. 
	Markets
	 
	Please
	see Section 9.A above.
	 
	D. 
	Selling
	Shareholders
	 
	Not
	Applicable.
	 
	E. 
	Dilution
	 
	Not
	Applicable.
	 
	F. 
	Expenses of the
	Issue
	 
	Not
	Applicable.
	 
	ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
	 
	A. 
	Share
	Capital
	 
	Not
	Applicable.
	 
	B. 
	Memorandum and
	Articles of Association
	 
	The following is a summary of our Notice of Articles and Articles.
	You should read those documents for a complete understanding of the
	rights and limitations set out therein. Our corporation number, as
	assigned by the British Columbia Registry Services, is
	BC1027632.
	 
	Remuneration of Directors
	 
	Our directors are entitled to the remuneration, if any, for acting
	as directors as the directors may from time to time determine. If
	the directors so decide, the remuneration of the directors will be
	determined by the shareholders. That remuneration may be in
	addition to any salary or other remuneration paid to a director in
	such director’s capacity as an officer or employee of
	ours.
	 
	Number of Directors
	 
	According to Article 11.1 of our Articles, the number of directors,
	excluding additional directors appointed under Article 12.7 is set
	at:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(a)
 | 
	subject
	to paragraphs (b) and (c), the number of directors that is equal to
	the number of our first directors;
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(b)
 | 
	if we
	are a public company, the greater of three and the number most
	recently elected by ordinary resolution (whether or not previous
	notice of the resolution was given); and
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(c)
 | 
	if we
	are not a public company, the number most recently elected by
	ordinary resolution (whether or not previous notice of the
	resolution was given).
 | 
 
	 
	Directors
	 
	Our directors are elected annually at each annual meeting of our
	company’s shareholders. Our Articles provide that the Board
	of Directors may, between annual meetings, appoint one or more
	additional directors to serve until the next annual meeting, but
	the number of additional directors must not at any time
	exceed:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(a)
 | 
	one-third
	of the number of first directors, if, at the time of the
	appointments, one or more of the first directors have not yet
	completed their first term of office; or
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(b)
 | 
	in any
	other case, one-third of the number of the current directors who
	were elected or appointed as directors at the expiration of the
	last annual meeting of our company’s
	shareholders.
 | 
 
	 
	57
	 
	 
	 
	Our Articles provide that our directors may from time to time on
	behalf of our company, without shareholder approval:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	create
	one or more classes or series of shares or, if none of the shares
	of a class or series of shares are allotted or issued, eliminate
	that class or series of shares;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	increase, reduce or
	eliminate the maximum number of shares that we are authorized to
	issue out of any class or series of shares or establish a maximum
	number of shares that we are authorized to issue out of any class
	or series of shares for which no maximum is
	established;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	if we
	are authorized to issue shares of a class of shares with par
	value:
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	o
 | 
	decrease the par
	value of those shares;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	o
 | 
	if none
	of the shares of that class of shares are allotted or issued,
	increase the par value of those shares;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	o
 | 
	subdivide all or
	any of its unissued or fully paid issued shares with par value into
	shares of smaller par value; or
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	o
 | 
	consolidate all or
	any of its unissued or fully paid issued shares with par value into
	share of larger par value;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	subdivide all or
	any of its unissued or fully paid issued shares without par
	value;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	change
	all or any of its unissued or fully paid issued shares with par
	value into shares without par value or all or any of its unissued
	shares without par value into shares with par value;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	alter
	the identifying name of any of its shares;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	consolidate all or
	any of its unissued or fully paid issued shares without par
	value;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	otherwise alter it
	shares or authorized share structure when required or permitted to
	do so by the 
	Business
	 
	Corporations Act
	;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	borrow
	money in the manner and amount, on the security, from the sources
	and on the terms and conditions that they consider
	appropriate;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	issue
	bonds, debentures and other debt obligations either outright or as
	security for any liability or obligation of the Company or any
	other person, and at any discount or premium and on such terms as
	they consider appropriate;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	guarantee the
	repayment of money by any other person or the performance of any
	obligation of any other person; or
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	mortgage or charge,
	whether by way of specific or floating charge, or give other
	security on the whole or any part of the present and future assets
	and undertaking of the Company.
 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	Our Articles also provide that, we may by resolution of the
	directors authorize an alteration to our Notice of Articles to
	change our name or adopt or change any translation of that
	name.
	 
	Our Articles provide that the directors may meet together for the
	conduct of business, adjourn and otherwise regulate their meetings
	as they think fit, and meetings of the Board held at regular
	intervals may be held at the place and at the time that the Board
	may by resolution from time to time determine. Questions arising at
	any meeting of directors are to be decided by a majority of votes
	and, in the case of an equality of votes, the chair of the meeting
	does not have a second or casting vote. A director may participate
	in a meeting of the directors or of any committee of the directors
	in person, or by telephone or other communications medium, if all
	directors participating in the meeting are able to communicate with
	each other. A director may participate in a meeting of the
	directors or of any committee of the directors by a communications
	medium other than telephone if all directors participating in the
	meeting, whether in person or by telephone or other communications
	medium, are able to communicate with each other and if all
	directors who wish to participate in the meeting agree to such
	participation. A director who participates in a meeting in a manner
	contemplated by such provisions of our Articles is deemed for all
	purposes of the 
	Business Corporations
	Act
	and our Articles to be
	present at the meeting and to have agreed to participate in that
	manner.
	 
	58
	 
	 
	 
	Our Articles provide that the quorum necessary for the transaction
	of the business of the directors may be set by the directors and,
	if not so set, is a majority of the directors.
	 
	Our Articles do not restrict: (i) a director’s power to vote
	on a proposal, arrangement or contract in which the director is
	materially interested (although the 
	Business Corporations
	Act
	 (British Columbia)
	generally requires a director who is materially interested in a
	material contract or material transaction to disclose his or her
	interest to the Board, and to abstain from voting on any resolution
	to approve the contract or transaction, failing which the British
	Columbia Supreme Court may, on application of our company or any of
	our shareholders, set aside the material contract or material
	transaction on any terms that it thinks fit, or require the
	director to account to the Company for any profit or gain realized
	on it, or both); or (ii) our directors’ power, in the absence
	of an independent quorum, to vote compensation to themselves or any
	members of their body.
	 
	Our Articles do not set out a mandatory retirement age for our
	directors. Our directors are not required to own securities of our
	company to serve as directors.
	 
	Authorized Capital
	 
	Our Notice of Articles provide that our authorized capital consists
	of an unlimited number of common shares, without par value, and an
	unlimited number of preferred shares, without par value, which have
	special rights or restrictions.
	 
	Rights, Preferences and Restrictions Attaching to Our
	Shares
	 
	The 
	Business Corporations
	Act
	 provides the following
	rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to our
	common shares:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	to vote
	at meetings of shareholders, except meetings at which only holders
	of a specified class of shares are entitled to vote;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	subject
	to the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to
	any other class of shares of our company, to share equally in the
	remaining property of our company on liquidation, dissolution or
	winding-up of our company; and
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	●
 | 
	subject
	to the rights of the preferred shares, the common shares are
	entitled to receive dividends if, as, and when declared by the
	Board of Directors.
 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	Our preferred shares may include one or more series and, subject to
	the 
	Business Corporations
	Act
	 , the directors may,
	by resolution, if none of the shares of that particular series are
	issued, alter our Articles and authorize the alteration of our
	Notice of Articles, as the case may be, to do one or more of the
	following:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(a)
 | 
	determine
	the maximum number of shares of that series that we are authorized
	to issue, determine that there is no such maximum number, or alter
	any such determination;
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(b)
 | 
	create
	an identifying name for the shares of that series, or alter any
	such identifying name; and
 
	 
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(c)
 | 
	attach
	special rights or restrictions to the shares of that series, or
	alter any such special rights or restrictions.
 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	The provisions in our Articles attaching to our common shares and
	our preferred shares may be altered, amended, repealed, suspended
	or changed by the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than
	two-thirds of the outstanding common shares and two-thirds of the
	preferred shares, as applicable.
	 
	With the exception of special resolutions (i.e. resolutions in
	respect of fundamental changes to our company, including: the sale
	of all or substantially all of our assets, a merger or other
	arrangement or an alteration to our authorized capital that is not
	allowed by resolution of the directors) that require the approval
	of holders of two-thirds of the outstanding common shares entitled
	to vote at a meeting, either in person or by proxy, resolutions to
	approve matters brought before a meeting of our shareholders
	require approval by a simple majority of the votes cast by
	shareholders entitled to vote at a meeting, either in person or by
	proxy.
	 
	59
	 
	 
	 
	Shareholder Meetings
	 
	The 
	Business Corporations
	Act
	provides that: (i) a
	general meetings of shareholders must be held in British Columbia,
	or may be held at a location outside British Columbia since our
	Articles do not restrict our company from approving a location
	outside of British Columbia for the holding of the general meeting
	and the location for the meeting is approved by ordinary
	resolution, or the location for the meeting is approving in writing
	by the British Columbia Registrar of Companies before the meeting
	is held; (ii) directors must call an annual meeting of shareholders
	not later than 15 months after the last preceding annual meeting;
	(iii) for the purpose of determining shareholders entitled to
	receive notice of or vote at meetings of shareholders, the
	directors may fix in advance a date as the record date for that
	determination, provided that such date shall not precede by more
	than two months or by less than 21 days the date on which the
	meeting is to be held; (iv) the holders of not less than 5% of the
	issued shares entitled to vote at a meeting may requisition the
	directors to call a meeting of shareholders for the purposes stated
	in the requisition; (v) only shareholders entitled to vote at the
	meeting, our directors and our auditor are entitled to be present
	at a meeting of shareholders; and (vi) upon the application of a
	director or shareholder entitled to vote at the meeting, the
	British Columbia Supreme Court may order a meeting to be called,
	held and conducted in a manner that the Court
	directs.
	 
	Pursuant to Article 8.20 of our Articles, a shareholder or proxy
	holder who is entitled to participate in a meeting of shareholders
	may do so in person, or by telephone or other communications
	medium, if all shareholders and proxy holders participating in the
	meeting are able to communicate with each other; provided, however,
	that nothing in Article 8.20 of our Articles shall obligate us to
	take any action or provide any facility to permit or facilitate the
	use of any communications medium at a meeting of shareholders. If
	one or more shareholders or proxy holders participate in a meeting
	of shareholders in a matter contemplated by Article 8.20 of our
	Articles:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(a)
 | 
	each
	such shareholder or proxy holder shall be deemed to be present at
	the meeting; and
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(b)
 | 
	the
	meeting shall be deemed to be help at the location specified in the
	notice of the meeting.
 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	Pursuant to our Articles, the quorum for the transaction of
	business at a meeting of our shareholders is one or more persons,
	present in person or by proxy.
	 
	LIMITATIONS ON RIGHTS OF NON-CANADIANS
	 
	Electrameccanica is incorporated pursuant to the laws of the
	Province of British Columbia, Canada. There is no law or
	governmental decree or regulation in Canada that restricts the
	export or import of capital, or affects the remittance of
	dividends, interest or other payments to a non-resident holder of
	common shares, other than withholding tax requirements. Any such
	remittances to United States residents are generally subject to
	withholding tax, however no such remittances are likely in the
	foreseeable future. See “Canadian Federal Income Tax
	Considerations For United States Residents,”
	below.
	 
	There is no limitation imposed by Canadian law or by the charter or
	other constituent documents of our company on the right of a
	non-resident to hold or vote common shares of our company. However,
	the
	Investment Canada
	Act
	 (Canada) (the
	“Investment Act”) has rules regarding certain
	acquisitions of shares by non-residents, along with other
	requirements under that legislation.
	 
	The following discussion summarizes the principal features of the
	Investment Act for a non-resident who proposes to acquire common
	shares of our company. The discussion is general only; it is not a
	substitute for independent legal advice from an investor’s
	own advisor; and it does not anticipate statutory or regulatory
	amendments.
	 
	The Investment Act is a federal statute of broad application
	regulating the establishment and acquisition of Canadian businesses
	by non-Canadians, including individuals, governments or agencies
	thereof, corporations, partnerships, trusts or joint ventures (each
	an “entity”). Investments by non-Canadians to acquire
	control over existing Canadian businesses or to establish new ones
	are either reviewable or notifiable under the Investment Act. If an
	investment by a non-Canadian to acquire control over an existing
	Canadian business is reviewable under the Investment Act, the
	Investment Act generally prohibits implementation of the investment
	unless, after review, the Minister of Industry, is satisfied that
	the investment is likely to be of net benefit to
	Canada.
	 
	60
	 
	 
	 
	A non-Canadian would acquire control of our company for the
	purposes of the Investment Act through the acquisition of common
	shares if the non-Canadian acquired a majority of the common shares
	of our company.
	 
	Further, the acquisition of less than a majority but one-third or
	more of the common shares of our company would be presumed to be an
	acquisition of control of our company unless it could be
	established that, on the acquisition, our company was not
	controlled in fact by the acquirer through the ownership of common
	shares.
	 
	For a direct acquisition that would result in an acquisition of
	control of our company, subject to the exception for
	“WTO-investors” that are controlled by persons who are
	resident in World Trade Organization (“WTO”) member
	nations, a proposed investment would be reviewable where the value
	of the acquired assets is $5 million or more, or if an order for
	review was made by the federal cabinet on the grounds that the
	investment related to Canada’s cultural heritage or national
	identity, where the value of the acquired assets is less than $5
	million.
	 
	For a proposed indirect acquisition that is not a so-called WTO
	transaction and that would result in an acquisition of control of
	our company through the acquisition of a non-Canadian parent
	entity, the investment would be reviewable where (a) the value of
	the Canadian assets acquired in the transaction is $50 million or
	more, or (b) the value of the Canadian assets is greater than 50%
	of the value of all of the assets acquired in the transaction and
	the value of the Canadian assets is $5 million or
	more.
	 
	In the case of a direct acquisition by or from a “WTO
	investor”, the threshold is significantly higher. The 2016
	threshold was $600 million was increased to $800 million in April
	2017 for a two year period. Other than the exception noted below,
	an indirect acquisition involving a WTO investor is not reviewable
	under the Investment Act.
	 
	The higher WTO threshold for direct investments and the exemption
	for indirect investments do not apply where the relevant Canadian
	business is carrying on a “cultural business”. The
	acquisition of a Canadian business that is a “cultural
	business” is subject to lower review thresholds under the
	Investment Act because of the perceived sensitivity of the cultural
	sector.
	 
	In 2009, amendments were enacted to the Investment Act concerning
	investments that may be considered injurious to national security.
	If the Minister of Industry has reasonable grounds to believe that
	an investment by a non-Canadian “could be injurious to
	national security,” the Minister of Industry may send the
	non-Canadian a notice indicating that an order for review of the
	investment may be made. The review of an investment on the grounds
	of national security may occur whether or not an investment is
	otherwise subject to review on the basis of net benefit to Canada
	or otherwise subject to notification under the Investment Act. To
	date, there is neither legislation nor guidelines published, or
	anticipated to be published, on the meaning of “injurious to
	national security.” Discussions with government officials
	suggest that very few investment proposals will cause a review
	under these new sections.
	 
	Certain transactions, except those to which the national security
	provisions of the Investment Act may apply, relating to common
	shares of our company are exempt from the Investment Act,
	including
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(a)
 | 
	the
	acquisition of our common shares by a person in the ordinary course
	of that person’s business as a trader or dealer in
	securities,
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(b)
 | 
	the
	acquisition of control of our company in connection with the
	realization of security granted for a loan or other financial
	assistance and not for a purpose related to the provisions on the
	Investment Act, and
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(c)
 | 
	the
	acquisition of control of our company by reason of an amalgamation,
	merger, consolidation or corporate reorganization following which
	the ultimate direct or indirect control in fact of our company,
	through the ownership of common shares, remained
	unchanged.
 | 
 
	 
	C. 
	Material
	Contracts
	 
	The
	following summary of our material agreements, all of which have
	been previously filed with the SEC, does not purport to be complete
	and is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
	to, all the provisions of those agreements. There are no material
	contracts, other than those contracts entered into in the ordinary
	course of business, currently in place or to which we or any member
	of our group is a party, from the two years immediately preceding
	the publication of this annual report, except as
	follows:
	 
	 
	61
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Lease Agreement
	 
	Together with our subsidiary, Intermeccanica, we entered into a
	lease agreement with Cressey (Quebec Street) Development LLP (the
	“Landlord”) to jointly lease the premises located at
	102 East 1stAvenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5T 1A4.
	The term of the lease is 60 months commencing November 1, 2015. We
	will pay half of the lease costs, including fees, taxes, and other
	charges associated with occupancy, to a maximum amount of $4,000
	per month or $48,000 per year, paid in equal monthly installments.
	We will provide additional payment for any additional expenses
	incurred by Intermeccanica and us pursuant to the lease. Beginning
	August 1, 2015, we will also pay 25% of the costs associated with
	Intermeccanica’s existing lease at 39 Braid Street, New
	Westminster, British Columbia, Canada. We also advanced $10,000
	(and whatever else is reasonably agreed upon mutually) to
	Intermeccanica prior to occupancy, which was used for improvement
	costs. We are not be able to sublease the premises.
	 
	SOLO Manufacturing Agreement
	 
	On October 2, 2017, we announced a manufacturing agreement with
	Zongshen to produce 75,000 SOLO all-electric vehicles over the next
	three years. Specifically, the plan calls for the production of
	5,000 SOLOs in 2018; 20,000 in 2019; and 50,000 in 2020. Under the
	agreement the Company agrees to reimburse Zongshen for the cost of
	the prototype tooling and molds estimated to be $1.8 million, which
	shall be payable on or before March 18, 2018, and the mass
	production tooling and molds estimated to be $6.0 million, which
	shall be payable 50% when Zongshen commences manufacturing the
	tooling and molds (which we expect will be in the second quarter of
	2018), 40% when Zongshen completes manufacturing the tooling and
	molds (which we expect will be in the third quarter of 2018), and
	10% upon delivery to the Company of the first production vehicle
	(which we expect will be in the third quarter of
	2018).
	 
	Share Pledge Agreement
	 
	In
	connection with the manufacturing agreement with Zongshen, on
	October 16, 2017, Jerry Kroll, our President and CEO, entered into
	a Share Pledge Agreement to guarantee the payment by us for the
	cost of the prototype tooling and molds estimated to be $1.8
	million to Zongshen through the pledge of 800,000 of our common
	shares at a deemed price of USD $2.00. We have agreed to reimburse
	Mr. Kroll on a one-for-one basis for any pledged shares realized by
	Zongshen under the Share Pledge Agreement.
	 
	Share Purchase Agreement
	 
	On
	October 18, 2017 we entered into the SPA to acquire Intermeccanica,
	which replaced the Joint Operating Agreement. Under the SPA, we
	agreed to purchase all the shares of Intermeccanica for $2,500,000.
	In addition to an initial payment of $100,000 in 2016, during the
	nine months ended September 30, 2017 an additional $200,000 was
	paid. On October 18, 2017, we paid $700,000, and entered into a
	Note for the balance of $1,500,000 of the Purchase Price. On
	January 28, 2018, we paid off all of the principal and interest due
	on the Note for $1,520,548.
	 
	D. 
	Exchange
	Controls
	 
	We are
	incorporated pursuant to the laws of the Province of British
	Columbia, Canada. There is no law or governmental decree or
	regulation in Canada that restricts the export or import of
	capital, or affects the remittance of dividends, interest or other
	payments to a non-resident holder of common shares, other than
	withholding tax requirements. Any such remittances to United States
	residents are generally subject to withholding tax, however no such
	remittances are likely in the foreseeable future. See
	“Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Information For United
	States Residents,” below.
	 
	There
	is no limitation imposed by Canadian law or by the charter or other
	constituent documents of our Company on the right of a non-resident
	to hold or vote common shares of our Company. However,
	the 
	Investment Canada
	Act
	 (Canada) (the “Investment Act”) has
	rules regarding certain acquisitions of shares by non-residents,
	along with other requirements under that legislation.
	 
	The
	following discussion summarizes the principal features of the
	Investment Act for a nonresident who proposes to acquire common
	shares of our Company. The discussion is general only; it is not a
	substitute for independent legal advice from an investor’s
	own advisor; and it does not anticipate statutory or regulatory
	amendments.
	 
	The
	Investment Act is a federal statute of broad application regulating
	the establishment and acquisition of Canadian businesses by
	non-Canadians, including individuals, governments or agencies
	thereof, corporations, partnerships, trusts or joint ventures (each
	an “entity”). Investments by non-Canadians to acquire
	control over existing Canadian businesses or to establish new ones
	are either reviewable or notifiable under the Investment Act. If an
	investment by a non-Canadian to acquire control over an existing
	Canadian business is reviewable under the Investment Act, the
	Investment Act generally prohibits implementation of the investment
	unless, after review, the Minister of Industry, is satisfied that
	the investment is likely to be of net benefit to
	Canada.
	 
	 
	62
	 
	 
	 
	 
	A
	non-Canadian would acquire control of our Company for the purposes
	of the Investment Act through the acquisition of common shares if
	the non-Canadian acquired a majority of the common shares of our
	Company.
	 
	Further,
	the acquisition of less than a majority but one-third or more of
	the common shares of our Company would be presumed to be an
	acquisition of control of our Company unless it could be
	established that, on the acquisition, our Company was not
	controlled in fact by the acquirer through the ownership of common
	shares.
	 
	For a
	direct acquisition that would result in an acquisition of control
	of our Company, subject to the exception for
	“WTO-investors” that are controlled by persons who are
	resident in World Trade Organization (“WTO”) member
	nations, a proposed investment would be reviewable where the value
	of the acquired assets is CAD $5 million or more, or if an order
	for review was made by the federal cabinet on the grounds that the
	investment related to Canada’s cultural heritage or national
	identity, where the value of the acquired assets is less than CAD
	$5 million.
	 
	For a
	proposed indirect acquisition that is not a so-called WTO
	transaction and that would result in an acquisition of control of
	our Company through the acquisition of a non-Canadian parent
	entity, the investment would be reviewable where (a) the value of
	the Canadian assets acquired in the transaction is CAD $50 million
	or more, or (b) the value of the Canadian assets is greater than
	50% of the value of all of the assets acquired in the transaction
	and the value of the Canadian assets is CAD $5 million or
	more.
	 
	In the
	case of a direct acquisition by or from a “WTO
	investor”, the threshold is significantly higher. The 2016
	threshold is CAD$600 million, which threshold will be increased to
	CAD$800 million in April 2017 for a two year period. Other than the
	exception noted below, an indirect acquisition involving a WTO
	investor is not reviewable under the Investment Act.
	 
	The
	higher WTO threshold for direct investments and the exemption for
	indirect investments do not apply where the relevant Canadian
	business is carrying on a “cultural business”. The
	acquisition of a Canadian business that is a “cultural
	business” is subject to lower review thresholds under the
	Investment Act because of the perceived sensitivity of the cultural
	sector.
	 
	In
	2009, amendments were enacted to the Investment Act concerning
	investments that may be considered injurious to national security.
	If the Industry Minister has reasonable grounds to believe that an
	investment by a non-Canadian “could be injurious to national
	security,” the Industry Minister may send the non-Canadian a
	notice indicating that an order for review of the investment may be
	made. The review of an investment on the grounds of national
	security may occur whether or not an investment is otherwise
	subject to review on the basis of net benefit to Canada or
	otherwise subject to notification under the Investment Canada Act.
	To date, there is neither legislation nor guidelines published, or
	anticipated to be published, on the meaning of “injurious to
	national security.” Discussions with government officials
	suggest that very few investment proposals will cause a review
	under these new sections.
	 
	Certain
	transactions, except those to which the national security
	provisions of the Investment Act may apply, relating to common
	shares of our Company are exempt from the Investment Act,
	including:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	(a)
 | 
	acquisition
	of common shares of the Company by a person in the ordinary course
	of that person’s business as a trader or dealer in
	securities,
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(b)
 | 
	acquisition
	of control of our Company in connection with the realization of
	security granted for a loan or other financial assistance and not
	for a purpose related to the provisions on the Investment Act,
	and
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	(c)
 | 
	acquisition
	of control of our Company by reason of an amalgamation, merger,
	consolidation or corporate reorganization following which the
	ultimate direct or indirect control in fact of our Company, through
	the ownership of common shares, remained unchanged.
 | 
 
	 
	E. 
	Taxation
	 
	CANADIAN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR UNITED STATES
	RESIDENTS
	 
	The
	following is a summary of the principal Canadian federal income tax
	considerations generally applicable to the holding and disposition
	of our common shares acquired by a holder who, at all relevant
	times, (a) for the purposes of the 
	Income Tax Act
	 (Canada) (the
	“Tax Act”), (i) is not resident, or deemed to be
	resident, in Canada, (ii) deals at arm’s length with us, and
	is not affiliated with us, (iii) holds our common shares as capital
	property, (iv) does not use or hold the common shares in the course
	of carrying on, or otherwise in connection with, a business carried
	on or deemed to be carried on in Canada and (v) is not a
	“registered non-resident insurer” or “authorized
	foreign bank” (each as defined in the Tax Act), and (b) for
	the purposes of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention, is a resident of
	the United States, has never been a resident of Canada, does not
	have and has not had, at any time, a permanent establishment or
	fixed base in Canada, for purposes of the Tax Act, and who
	otherwise qualifies for the full benefits of the Canada-U.S. Tax
	Convention. The common shares will generally be considered to be
	capital property to a holder unless such common shares are held in
	the course of carrying on a business of buying or selling
	securities, or as part of an adventure or concern in the nature of
	trade. Holders who meet all the criteria in clauses (a) and (b) are
	referred to herein as “Non-Canadian
	Holders”.
	 
	63
	 
	 
	 
	 
	This
	summary does not deal with special situations, such as the
	particular circumstances of traders or dealers, tax exempt
	entities, insurers or financial institutions. Such holders and
	other holders who do not meet the criteria in clauses (a) and (b)
	should consult their own tax advisers.
	 
	This
	summary is based upon the current provisions of the Tax Act, the
	regulations thereunder in force at the date hereof
	(“Regulations”), the current provisions of the
	Canada-U.S. Tax Convention and our understanding of the
	administrative and assessing practices of the Canada Revenue Agency
	published in writing prior to the date hereof. This summary takes
	into account all specific proposals to amend the Tax Act and
	Regulations publicly announced by or on behalf of the Minister of
	Finance (Canada) prior to the date hereof (the “Proposed
	Amendments”)and assumes that such Proposed Amendments will be
	enacted in the form proposed. However, no assurance can be given
	that such Proposed Amendments will be enacted in the form proposed,
	or at all. This summary does not otherwise take into account or
	anticipate any changes in law or administrative or assessing
	practices, whether by legislative, governmental or judicial
	decision or action, nor does it take into account tax laws of any
	province or territory of Canada or of any other jurisdiction
	outside Canada, which may differ from those discussed in this
	summary. For the purposes of the Tax Act, all amounts relating to
	the acquisition, holding or disposition of our common shares must
	generally be expressed in Canadian dollars. Amounts denominated in
	United States currency generally must be converted into Canadian
	dollars using the rate of exchange that is acceptable to the Canada
	Revenue Agency.
	 
	This
	summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to be, nor
	should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular
	Non-Canadian Holder and no representation with respect to the
	Canadian federal income tax consequences to any particular
	Non-Canadian Holder or prospective Non-Canadian Holder is made.
	This summary is not exhaustive of all Canadian federal income tax
	considerations. Accordingly, prospective purchasers should consult
	with their own tax advisors for advice with respect to their own
	particular circumstances.
	 
	Withholding Tax on Dividends
	 
	Amounts
	paid or credited or deemed to be paid or credited as, on account or
	in lieu of payment, or in satisfaction of, dividends on our common
	shares to a Non Canadian Holder will be subject to Canadian
	withholding tax. Under the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention, the rate of
	Canadian withholding tax on dividends paid or credited by us to a
	Non-Canadian Holder that beneficially owns such dividends is
	generally 15% unless the beneficial owner is a company, which owns
	at least 10% of our voting stock at that time, in which case the
	rate of Canadian withholding tax is reduced to 5%.
	 
	Dispositions
	 
	A
	Non-Canadian Holder will not be subject to tax under the Tax Act on
	any capital gain realized on a disposition or deemed disposition of
	a common share, unless the common shares are “taxable
	Canadian property” to the Non-Canadian Holder for purposes of
	the Tax Act and the Non-Canadian Holder is not entitled to relief
	under an applicable income tax convention between Canada and the
	country in which the Non-Canadian Holder is resident.
	 
	Generally,
	the common shares will not constitute “taxable Canadian
	property” to a Non-Canadian Holder at a particular time
	unless at any time during the 60 month period immediately preceding
	the disposition, more than 50% of the fair market value of the
	common shares was derived, directly or indirectly, from one or any
	combination of: (i) real or immoveable property situated in Canada,
	(ii) “Canadian resource properties” (as defined in the
	Tax Act), (iii) “timber resource properties” (as
	defined in the Tax Act), and (iv) options in respect of, or
	interests in, or for civil law rights in, property in any of the
	foregoing whether or not the property exists. Notwithstanding the
	foregoing, in certain circumstances set out in the Tax Act, common
	shares could be deemed to be “taxable Canadian
	property”. Non-Canadian Holders whose common shares may
	constitute “taxable Canadian property” should consult
	their own tax advisors.
	 
	Under
	the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention, the gains derived by a Non-Canadian
	Holder from the disposition of common shares would generally not be
	taxable in Canada unless the value of the common shares is derived
	principally from real property situated in Canada. The Company
	believes that the value of its common shares are not currently
	derived principally from real property situated in Canada and it
	does not expect this to change in the foreseeable
	future.
	 
	 
	64
	 
	 
	 
	 
	CERTAIN MATERIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX
	CONSIDERATIONS
	 
	The
	following is a general summary of certain material U.S. federal
	income tax considerations applicable to a U.S. Holder (as defined
	below) arising from the acquisition, ownership and disposition of
	our common stock. This summary applies only to U.S. Holders that
	acquire our common stock from a Selling Securityholder pursuant to
	this prospectus and does not apply to any subsequent U.S. Holder of
	our common stock.
	 
	This
	summary is for general information purposes only and does not
	purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential U.S.
	federal income tax considerations that may apply to a U.S. Holder
	as a result of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our
	common stock. In addition, this summary does not take into account
	the individual facts and circumstances of any particular U.S.
	Holder that may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences to
	such U.S. Holder, including specific tax consequences to a U.S.
	Holder under an applicable tax treaty. Accordingly, this summary is
	not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal or U.S.
	federal income tax advice with respect to any particular U.S.
	Holder. In addition, this summary does not address the U.S. federal
	alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. Medicare
	contribution, U.S. state and local, or non-U.S. tax consequences of
	the acquisition, ownership or disposition of our common stock.
	Except as specifically set forth below, this summary does not
	discuss applicable tax reporting requirements. 
	Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax
	advisor regarding all U.S. federal, U.S. state and local and
	non-U.S. tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and
	disposition of our common stock.
	 
	No
	opinion from U.S. legal counsel or ruling from the Internal Revenue
	Service (the “IRS”) has been requested, or will be
	obtained, regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
	acquisition, ownership or disposition of our common stock. This
	summary is not binding on the IRS, and the IRS is not precluded
	from taking a position that is different from, or contrary to, any
	position taken in this summary. In addition, because the
	authorities upon whom this summary is based are subject to various
	interpretations, the IRS and the U.S. courts could disagree with
	one or more of the positions taken in this summary.
	 
	Scope of This Disclosure
	 
	Authorities
	 
	This
	summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
	(the “Code”), Treasury Regulations (whether final,
	temporary, or proposed), published rulings of the IRS, published
	administrative positions of the IRS, the Convention Between Canada
	and the United States of America with Respect to Taxes on Income
	and on Capital, signed September 26, 1980, as amended (the
	“Canada-U.S. Tax Convention”), and U.S. court decisions
	that are applicable and, in each case, as in effect and available,
	as of the date hereof. Any of the authorities on which this summary
	is based could be changed in a material and adverse manner at any
	time, and any such change could be applied on a retroactive or
	prospective basis, which could affect the U.S. federal income tax
	considerations described in this summary. This summary does not
	discuss the potential effects, whether adverse or beneficial, of
	any proposed legislation that, if enacted, could be applied on a
	retroactive or prospective basis.
	 
	U.S. Holders
	 
	For
	purposes of this summary, the term “U.S. Holder” means
	a beneficial owner of our common stock that is for U.S. federal
	income tax purposes:
	 
	●
	an individual who
	is a citizen or resident of the U.S.;
 
 
	 
	●
	a corporation (or
	other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax
	purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S.,
	any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
 
 
	 
	●
	an estate, the
	income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation
	regardless of its source; or
 
 
	 
	●
	a trust that (a) is
	subject to the primary supervision of a court within the U.S. and
	the control of one or more U.S. persons for all substantial
	decisions or (b) has a valid election in effect under applicable
	Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.
 
 
	 
	Transactions Not Addressed
	 
	This
	summary does not address the tax consequences of transactions
	effected prior or subsequent to, or concurrently with, any purchase
	of our common stock pursuant to this prospectus (whether or not any
	such transactions are undertaken in connection with the purchase of
	our common stock pursuant to this prospectus).
	 
	65
	 
	 
	 
	 
	U.S. Holders Subject to Special U.S. Federal Income Tax Rules Not
	Addressed
	 
	This
	summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax considerations
	of the acquisition, ownership or disposition of our common stock by
	U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code,
	including, but not limited to, the following: (a) tax-exempt
	organizations, qualified retirement plans, individual retirement
	accounts, or other tax-deferred accounts; (b) financial
	institutions, underwriters, insurance companies, real estate
	investment trusts, or regulated investment companies; (c)
	broker-dealers, dealers, or traders in securities or currencies
	that elect to apply a “mark-to-market” accounting
	method; (d) U.S. Holders that have a “functional
	currency” other than the U.S. dollar; (e) U.S. Holders that
	own our common stock as part of a straddle, hedging transaction,
	conversion transaction, constructive sale, or other arrangement
	involving more than one position; (f) U.S. Holders that acquire our
	common stock in connection with the exercise of employee stock
	options or otherwise as compensation for services; (g) U.S. Holders
	that hold our common stock other than as a capital asset within the
	meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for
	investment purposes); and (h) U.S. Holders that own directly,
	indirectly, or by attribution, 10% or more, by voting power, of the
	outstanding stock of the Company. This summary also does not
	address the U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to
	U.S. Holders who are: (a) U.S. expatriates or former long-term
	residents of the U.S.; (b) persons that have been, are, or will be
	a resident or deemed to be a resident in Canada for purposes of the
	Income Tax Act (Canada); (c) persons that use or hold, will use or
	hold, or that are or will be deemed to use or hold our common stock
	in connection with carrying on a business in Canada; (d) persons
	whose common stock in our Company constitutes “taxable
	Canadian property” under the Income Tax Act (Canada); or (e)
	persons that have a permanent establishment in Canada for purposes
	of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention. U.S. Holders that are subject to
	special provisions under the Code, including U.S. Holders described
	immediately above, should consult their own tax advisors regarding
	all U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and non-U.S. tax
	consequences (including the potential application and operation of
	any income tax treaties) relating to the acquisition, ownership or
	disposition of our common stock.
	 
	If an
	entity or arrangement that is classified as a partnership (or other
	“pass-through” entity) for U.S. federal income tax
	purposes holds our common stock, the U.S. federal income tax
	consequences to such partnership and the partners (or other owners)
	of such partnership of the acquisition, ownership or disposition of
	our common stock generally will depend on the activities of the
	partnership and the status of such partners (or other owners). This
	summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax considerations
	for any such partner or partnership (or other
	“pass-through” entity or its owners). Owners of
	entities and arrangements that are classified as partnerships (or
	other “pass-through” entities) for U.S. federal income
	tax purposes should consult their own tax advisors regarding the
	U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership
	or disposition of our common stock.
	 
	Acquisition of Our Common Stock
	 
	A U.S.
	Holder generally will not recognize gain or loss upon the
	acquisition of our common stock from a Selling Securityholder for
	cash pursuant to this prospectus. A U.S. Holder’s initial tax
	basis in our common stock acquired pursuant to this prospectus will
	be equal to the U.S. Holder’s U.S. dollar cost for the common
	stock. A U.S. Holder’s holding period for such common stock
	will begin on the day after the acquisition.
	 
	Ownership and Disposition of Our Common Stock
	 
	Distributions on Our Common Stock
	 
	Subject
	to the “passive foreign investment company”
	(“PFIC”) rules discussed below (see “Tax
	Consequences if the Company is a PFIC”), a U.S. Holder that
	receives a distribution, including a constructive distribution,
	with respect to our common stock will be required to include the
	amount of such distribution in gross income as a dividend (without
	reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such
	distribution) to the extent of the current or accumulated
	“earnings and profits” of the Company, as computed for
	U.S. federal income tax purposes. To the extent that a distribution
	exceeds the current and accumulated “earnings and
	profits” of the Company, such distribution will be treated
	first as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of a U.S.
	Holder’s tax basis in our common stock and thereafter as gain
	from the sale or exchange of such common stock (see “Sale or
	Other Taxable Disposition of Our Common Stock” below).
	However, the Company may not maintain calculations of earnings and
	profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax principles, and
	each U.S. Holder should therefore assume that any distribution by
	the Company with respect to our common stock will constitute a
	dividend. Dividends received on our common stock generally will not
	be eligible for the “dividends received deduction”
	available to U.S. corporate shareholders receiving dividends from
	U.S. corporations. If the Company is eligible for the benefits of
	the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention or our common stock is readily
	tradable on an established securities market in the U.S., dividends
	paid by the Company to non-corporate U.S. Holders generally will be
	eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term
	capital gains, provided certain holding period and other conditions
	are satisfied, including that the Company not be classified as a
	PFIC in the tax year of distribution or in the preceding tax year.
	The dividend rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult
	its own tax advisor regarding the application of such
	rules.
	 
	 
	66
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of Our Common Stock
	 
	Subject
	to the PFIC rules discussed below, upon the sale or other taxable
	disposition of our common stock, a U.S. Holder generally will
	recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference
	between the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any
	property received and such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the
	common stock sold or otherwise disposed of. Such capital gain or
	loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if, at the time of the
	sale or other taxable disposition, the U.S. Holder’s holding
	period for our common stock is more than one year. Preferential tax
	rates apply to long-term capital gains of non-corporate U.S.
	Holders. There are currently no preferential tax rates for
	long-term capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is a corporation.
	Deductions for capital losses are subject to significant
	limitations under the Code.
	 
	PFIC Status of the Company
	 
	If the
	Company is or becomes a PFIC, the preceding sections of this
	summary may not describe the U.S. federal income tax consequences
	to U.S. Holders of the ownership and disposition of our common
	stock. The U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning and
	disposing of our common stock if the Company is or becomes a PFIC
	are described below under the heading “Tax Consequences if
	the Company is a PFIC.”
	 
	A
	non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC for each tax year in which (i) 75%
	or more of its gross income is passive income (as defined for U.S.
	federal income tax purposes) (the “income test”) or
	(ii) on average for such tax year, 50% or more (by value) of its
	assets either produces or is held for the production of passive
	income (the “asset test”). For purposes of the PFIC
	provisions, “gross income” generally includes sales
	revenues less cost of goods sold, plus income from investments and
	from incidental or outside operations or sources, and
	“passive income” generally includes dividends,
	interest, certain rents and royalties, and certain gains from
	commodities or securities transactions. In determining whether or
	not it is a PFIC, a non-U.S. corporation is required to take into
	account its pro rata portion of the income and assets of each
	corporation in which it owns, directly or indirectly, at least a
	25% interest (by value). If certain conditions are met, a start-up
	non-U.S. corporation is not a PFIC in the first year that it has
	gross income, but could be a PFIC in one or more earlier years in
	which it has no gross income but satisfies the asset
	test.
	 
	Under
	certain attribution and indirect ownership rules, if the Company is
	a PFIC, U.S. Holders will generally be deemed to own their
	proportionate shares of the Company’s direct or indirect
	equity interest in any company that is also a PFIC (a
	“Subsidiary PFIC”). At this time, however, the Company
	does not own any direct or indirect equity interests in another
	company.
	 
	The
	Company does not know if it currently is a PFIC or was a PFIC in a
	prior year and, based on current business plans and financial
	projections, does not know if it will be a PFIC in subsequent tax
	years. The determination of PFIC status is inherently factual, is
	subject to a number of uncertainties, and can be determined only
	annually after the close of the tax year in question. Additionally,
	the analysis depends, in part, on the application of complex U.S.
	federal income tax rules, which are subject to differing
	interpretations. There can be no assurance that the Company will or
	will not be determined to be a PFIC for the current tax year or any
	prior or future tax year, and no opinion of legal counsel or ruling
	from the IRS concerning the status of the Company as a PFIC has
	been obtained or will be requested. U.S. Holders should consult
	their own U.S. tax advisors regarding the PFIC status of the
	Company.
	 
	Tax Consequences if the Company is a PFIC
	 
	If the
	Company is a PFIC for any tax year during which a U.S. Holder owns
	our common stock, special rules may increase such U.S.
	Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability with respect to
	the ownership and disposition of such common stock. If the Company
	meets the income test or the asset test for any tax year during
	which a U.S. Holder owns our common stock, the Company will be
	treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. Holder for that tax
	year and for all subsequent tax years, regardless of whether the
	Company meets the income test or the asset test for such subsequent
	tax years, unless the U.S. Holder elects to recognize any
	unrealized gain in such common stock or makes a timely and
	effective QEF Election or, if applicable, Mark-to-Market
	Election.
	 
	Under
	the default PFIC rules:
	 
	●
	any gain realized
	on the sale or other disposition (including dispositions and
	certain other events that would not otherwise be treated as taxable
	events) of our common stock (including an indirect disposition of
	the stock of any Subsidiary PFIC) and any “excess
	distribution” (defined as a distribution to the extent it,
	together with all other distributions received in the relevant tax
	year, exceeds 125% of the average annual distribution received
	during the preceding three years) received on our common stock or
	with respect to the stock of a Subsidiary PFIC will be allocated
	rateably to each day of such U.S. Holder’s holding period for
	our common stock; 
 
 
	 
	●
	the amount
	allocated to the current tax year and any year prior to the first
	year in which the Company was a PFIC will be taxed as ordinary
	income in the current year; 
 
 
	 
	●
	the amount
	allocated to each of the other tax years (the “Prior PFIC
	Years”) will be subject to tax at the highest ordinary income
	tax rate in effect for the applicable class of taxpayer for that
	year; 
 
 
	 
	●
	an interest charge
	will be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to
	each Prior PFIC Year, which interest charge is not deductible by
	non-corporate U.S. Holders; and 
 
 
	 
	●
	any loss realized
	on the disposition of our common stock generally will not be
	recognized.
 
 
	 
	 
	67
	 
	 
	 
	 
	A U.S.
	Holder that makes a timely and effective
	“mark-to-market” election under Section 1296 of the
	Code (a “Mark-to-Market Election”) or a timely and
	effective election to treat the Company and each Subsidiary PFIC as
	a “qualified electing fund” (a “QEF”) under
	Section 1295 of the Code (a “QEF Election”) may
	generally mitigate or avoid the PFIC consequences described above
	with respect to our common stock.
	 
	If a
	U.S. Holder makes a timely and effective QEF Election, the U.S.
	Holder must include currently in gross income each year its pro
	rata share of the Company’s ordinary income and net capital
	gains, regardless of whether such income and gains are actually
	distributed. Thus, a U.S. Holder could have a tax liability with
	respect to such ordinary income or gains without a corresponding
	receipt of cash from the Company. If the Company is a QEF with
	respect to a U.S. Holder, the U.S. Holder’s basis in our
	common stock will be increased to reflect the amount of the taxed
	but undistributed income. Distributions of income that had
	previously been taxed will result in a corresponding reduction of
	basis in our common stock and will not be taxed again as a
	distribution to a U.S. Holder. Taxable gains on the disposition of
	our common stock by a U.S. Holder that has made a timely and
	effective QEF Election are generally capital gains. A U.S. Holder
	must make a QEF Election for the Company and each Subsidiary PFIC
	if it wishes to have this treatment. To make a QEF Election, a U.S.
	Holder will need to have an annual information statement from the
	Company setting forth the ordinary income and net capital gains for
	the year.
	 
	U.S. Holders
	should be aware that there can be no assurance that the Company
	will satisfy the recordkeeping requirements that apply to a QEF or
	that the Company will supply U.S. Holders with information such
	U.S. Holders require to report under the QEF rules in the event
	that the Company is a PFIC for any tax year.
	 
	In
	general, a U.S. Holder must make a QEF Election on or before the
	due date for filing its income tax return for the first year to
	which the QEF Election applies. Under applicable Treasury
	Regulations, a U.S. Holder will be permitted to make retroactive
	elections in particular circumstances, including if it had a
	reasonable belief that the Company was not a PFIC and filed a
	protective election. If a U.S. Holder owns PFIC stock indirectly
	through another PFIC, separate QEF Elections must be made for the
	PFIC in which the U.S. Holder is a direct shareholder and the
	Subsidiary PFIC for the QEF rules to apply to both PFICs. Each U.S.
	Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the
	availability and desirability of, and procedure for, making a
	timely and effective QEF Election for the Company and any
	Subsidiary PFIC.
	 
	A
	Mark-to-Market Election may be made with respect to stock in a PFIC
	if such stock is “regularly traded” on a
	“qualified exchange or other market” (within the
	meaning of the Code and the applicable Treasury Regulations). A
	class of stock that is traded on one or more qualified exchanges or
	other markets is considered to be “regularly traded”
	for any calendar year during which such class of stock is traded in
	other than de minimus quantities on at least 15 days during each
	calendar quarter. If our common stock is considered to be
	“regularly traded” within this meaning, then a U.S.
	Holder generally will be eligible to make a Mark-to-Market Election
	with respect to our common stock but not with respect to a
	Subsidiary PFIC. At this time, however, our common stock is not
	listed or posted for trading on any securities exchange or stock
	quotation system, and therefore is not considered to be
	“regularly traded” for this purpose.
	 
	Should
	our common stock become “regularly traded,” a U.S.
	Holder that makes a timely and effective Mark-to-Market Election
	with respect to our common stock generally will be required to
	recognize as ordinary income in each tax year in which the Company
	is a PFIC an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market
	value of such stock as of the close of such taxable year over the
	U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in such stock as of the
	close of such taxable year. A U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax
	basis in our common stock generally will be increased by the amount
	of ordinary income recognized with respect to such stock. If the
	U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in our common stock as of
	the close of a tax year exceeds the fair market value of such stock
	as of the close of such taxable year, the U.S. Holder generally
	will recognize an ordinary loss, but only to the extent of net
	mark-to-market income recognized with respect to such stock for all
	prior taxable years. A U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in
	our common stock generally will be decreased by the amount of
	ordinary loss recognized with respect to such stock. Any gain
	recognized upon a disposition of our common stock generally will be
	treated as ordinary income, and any loss recognized upon a
	disposition generally will be treated as ordinary loss to the
	extent of the net mark-to-market income recognized for all prior
	taxable years. Any loss recognized in excess thereof will be taxed
	as a capital loss. Capital losses are subject to significant
	limitations under the Code. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own
	tax advisor regarding the availability and desirability of, and
	procedure for, making a timely and effective Mark-to-Market
	Election with respect to our common stock.
	 
	Foreign Tax Credit
	 
	A U.S.
	Holder that pays (whether directly or through withholding) Canadian
	income tax in connection with the ownership or disposition of our
	common stock may be entitled, at the election of such U.S. Holder,
	to receive either a deduction or a credit for such Canadian income
	tax paid. Generally, a credit will reduce a U.S. Holder’s
	U.S. federal income tax liability on a dollar-for-dollar basis,
	whereas a deduction will reduce a U.S. Holder’s income
	subject to U.S. federal income tax. This election is made on a
	year-by-year basis and applies to all creditable foreign taxes paid
	(whether directly or through withholding) by a U.S. Holder during a
	year.
	 
	68
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Complex
	limitations apply to the foreign tax credit, including the general
	limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of
	a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability that such
	U.S. Holder’s “foreign source” taxable income
	bears to such U.S. Holder’s worldwide taxable income. In
	applying this limitation, a U.S. Holder’s various items of
	income and deduction must be classified, under complex rules, as
	either “foreign source” or “U.S. source.”
	Generally, dividends paid by a non-U.S. corporation should be
	treated as foreign source for this purpose, and gains recognized on
	the sale of securities of a non-U.S. corporation by a U.S. Holder
	should be treated as U.S. source for this purpose, except as
	otherwise provided in an applicable income tax treaty, and if an
	election is properly made under the Code. However, the amount of a
	distribution with respect to our common stock that is treated as a
	“dividend” may be lower for U.S. federal income tax
	purposes than it is for Canadian federal income tax purposes,
	resulting in a reduced foreign tax credit allowance to a U.S.
	Holder. In addition, this limitation is calculated separately with
	respect to specific categories of income. The foreign tax credit
	rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own U.S.
	tax advisor regarding the foreign tax credit rules.
	 
	Special
	rules apply to the amount of foreign tax credit that a U.S. Holder
	may claim on a distribution, including a constructive distribution,
	from a PFIC. Subject to such special rules, non-U.S. taxes paid
	with respect to any distribution in respect of stock in a PFIC are
	generally eligible for the foreign tax credit
	. 
	The rules relating to
	distributions by a PFIC and their eligibility for the foreign tax
	credit are complicated, and a U.S. Holder should consult its own
	tax advisor regarding their application to the U.S.
	Holder.
	 
	Receipt of Foreign Currency
	 
	The
	amount of any distribution or proceeds paid in Canadian dollars to
	a U.S. Holder in connection with the ownership, sale or other
	taxable disposition of our common stock, will be included in the
	gross income of a U.S. Holder as translated into U.S. dollars
	calculated by reference to the exchange rate prevailing on the date
	of actual or constructive receipt of the payment, regardless of
	whether the Canadian dollars are converted into U.S. dollars at
	that time. If the Canadian dollars received are not converted into
	U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder will have a
	basis in the Canadian dollars equal to their U.S. dollar value on
	the date of receipt. Any U.S. Holder who receives payment in
	Canadian dollars and engages in a subsequent conversion or other
	disposition of the Canadian dollars may have a foreign currency
	exchange gain or loss that would be treated as ordinary income or
	loss, and generally will be U.S. source income or loss for foreign
	tax credit purposes. Different rules apply to U.S. Holders who use
	the accrual method with respect to foreign currency. Each U.S.
	Holder should consult its own U.S. tax advisor regarding the U.S.
	federal income tax consequences of receiving, owning, and disposing
	of Canadian dollars.
	 
	Information Reporting; Backup Withholding
	 
	Under
	U.S. federal income tax law, certain categories of U.S. Holders
	must file information returns with respect to their investment in,
	or involvement in, a non-U.S. corporation. For example, U.S. return
	disclosure obligations (and related penalties) are imposed on
	individuals who are U.S. Holders that hold certain specified
	foreign financial assets in excess of certain threshold amounts.
	The definition of “specified foreign financial assets”
	includes not only financial accounts maintained in non-U.S.
	financial institutions, but also, if held for investment and not in
	an account maintained by certain financial institutions, any stock
	or security issued by a non-U.S. person, any financial instrument
	or contract that has an issuer or counterparty other than a U.S.
	person and any interest in a non-U.S. entity. A U.S. Holder may be
	subject to these reporting requirements unless such U.S.
	Holder’s shares of our common stock are held in an account at
	certain financial institutions. Penalties for failure to file
	certain of these information returns are substantial. U.S. Holders
	should consult with their own tax advisors regarding the
	requirements of filing information returns on IRS Form 8938 for
	specified foreign financial assets, filing obligations relating to
	the PFIC rules including possible reporting on IRS Form 8621, and
	any other applicable reporting requirements.
	 
	Payments
	made within the U.S. or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman of (a)
	distributions on our common stock, and (b) proceeds arising from
	the sale or other taxable disposition of our common stock generally
	will be subject to information reporting. In addition, backup
	withholding, currently at a rate of 28%, may apply to such payments
	if a U.S. Holder (a) fails to furnish such U.S. Holder’s
	correct U.S. taxpayer identification number (“TIN”)
	(generally on Form W-9), (b) furnishes an incorrect U.S. TIN, (c)
	is notified by the IRS that such U.S. Holder has previously failed
	to properly report items subject to backup withholding, or (d)
	fails to certify, under penalty of perjury, that such U.S. Holder
	has furnished its correct U.S. TIN and that the IRS has not
	notified such U.S. Holder that it is subject to backup withholding.
	Certain exempt persons generally are excluded from these
	information reporting and backup withholding rules. Backup
	withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under
	the U.S. backup withholding rules are allowed as a credit against a
	U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, or
	will be refunded, if such U.S. Holder furnishes required
	information to the IRS in a timely manner. The information
	reporting and backup withholding rules may apply even if, under the
	Canada-U.S. Tax Convention, payments are exempt from dividend
	withholding tax or otherwise eligible for a reduced withholding
	rate.
	 
	The
	discussion of reporting requirements set forth above is not
	intended to constitute an exhaustive description of all reporting
	requirements that may apply to a U.S. Holder. A failure to satisfy
	certain reporting requirements may result in an extension of the
	time period during which the IRS can assess a tax, and, under
	certain circumstances, such an extension may apply to assessments
	of amounts unrelated to any unsatisfied reporting requirement. Each
	U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the
	information reporting and backup withholding rules.
	 
	THE ABOVE SUMMARY IS NOT INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE ANALYSIS
	OF ALL U.S. TAX CONSIDERATIONS APPLICABLE TO U.S. HOLDERS WITH
	RESPECT TO THE ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP OR DISPOSITION OF OUR COMMON
	STOCK. U.S. HOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE
	TAX CONSIDERATIONS APPLICABLE TO THEM IN THEIR PARTICULAR
	CIRCUMSTANCES.
	 
	 
	69
	 
	 
	 
	 
	F. 
	Dividends and
	Paying Agents
	 
	Not
	Applicable.
	 
	G. 
	Statements by
	Experts
	 
	Not
	Applicable.
	 
	H. 
	Documents on
	Display
	 
	The
	documents concerning us which are referred to in this Annual Report
	may be inspected at our offices located at 102 East 1
	st
	 Avenue,
	Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5T 1A4.
	 
	In
	addition, we have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
	Form F-1 under the U.S. Securities Act and the documents referred
	to in this Annual Report have been filed as exhibits to such Form
	F-1 with the SEC and may be inspected and copied at the public
	reference facility maintained by the SEC at 100F. Street NW,
	Washington, D.C. 20549. In addition, the SEC maintains a website at
	www.sec.gov that contains copies of documents that we have filed
	with the SEC using its EDGAR system.
	 
	I.
	Subsidiary
	Information
	 
	We have
	one subsidiary,
	Intermeccanica
	International Inc., a corporation subsisting under the laws of the
	Province of British Columbia, Canada.
	We own 100% of the
	voting and dispositive control over the subsidiary
	 
	ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
	RISK
	 
	We are
	exposed in varying degrees to a variety of financial instrument
	related risks. The Board of Directors approves and monitors the
	risk management processes, inclusive of controlling and reporting
	structures. The type of risk exposure and the way in which such
	exposure is managed is provided as follows:
	 
	Credit Risk
	 
	Credit
	risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will fail
	to discharge an obligation and cause the other party to incur a
	financial loss. Our primary exposure to credit risk is on our cash
	held in bank accounts. The majority of cash is deposited in bank
	accounts held with major banks in Canada. As most of our cash is
	held by one bank there is a concentration of credit risk. This risk
	is managed by using major banks that are high credit quality
	financial institutions as determined by rating agencies. Our
	secondary exposure to risk is on its other receivables. This risk
	is minimal as receivables consist primarily of government grant and
	refundable government value added taxes.
	 
	Liquidity Risk
	 
	Liquidity
	risk is the risk that we will not be able to meet our financial
	obligations as they fall due. We have a planning and budgeting
	process in place to help determine the funds required to support
	our normal operating requirements on an ongoing basis. We ensure
	that there are sufficient funds to meet our short-term business
	requirements, taking into account our anticipated cash flows from
	operations and our holdings of cash and cash
	equivalents.
	 
	Historically,
	our source of funding has been shareholder loans and the issuance
	of equity securities for cash, primarily through private
	placements. Our access to financing is always uncertain. There can
	be no assurance of continued access to significant equity
	funding.
	 
	The
	following is an analysis of the contractual maturities of our
	non-derivative financial liabilities as at December 31, 2017 and
	2016:
	 
| 
	At December 31,
	2017
 |  | 
	 
	Between one and five
	years
 |  | 
| 
	Bank
	loan
 | 
	 
	$
	123,637
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Trade
	payables
 | 
	 
	 
	474,334
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Customer
	deposits
 | 
	 
	 
	447,071
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Convertible
	loan
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Shareholder
	loan
 | 
	 
	 
	10,383
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Promissory
	note
 | 
	 
	 
	1,500,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	2,555,425
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	At December 31,
	2016  
 |  | 
	 
	Between one and five
	years
 |  | 
| 
	Trade
	payables
 | 
	 
	$
	150,305
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Customer
	deposits
 | 
	 
	$
	169,500
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Convertible
	loan
 | 
	 
	$
	243,676
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Shareholder
	loan
 | 
	Nil
 |  |  | 
 
	 
	70
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Foreign Exchange Risk
	 
	Foreign
	currency risk is the risk that the fair values of future cash flows
	of a financial instrument will fluctuate because they are
	denominated in currencies that differ from the respective
	functional currency. We are exposed to currency risk as we incur
	expenditures that are denominated in US dollars while our
	functional currency is the Canadian dollar. We do not hedge our
	exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
	 
	The
	following is an analysis of Canadian dollar equivalent of financial
	assets and liabilities that are denominated in US
	dollars:
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Cash and cash
	equivalents
 | 
	 
	$
	98,762
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	5,596,635
	 
 | 
| 
	Trade
	payables
 | 
	 
	$
	(4,804
	)
 | 
	 
	$
	(138,794
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	93,958
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	5,457,841
	 
 | 
 
	 
	Interest Rate Risk
	 
	Interest
	rate risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a
	financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market
	interest rates. We are exposed to interest rate risk on our cash
	equivalents as these instruments have original maturities of three
	months or less and are therefore exposed to interest rate
	fluctuations on renewal. A 1% change in market interest rates would
	have an impact on our net loss of $1,064 for the period ended
	December 31, 2015. A 1% change in market interest rates would have
	an impact on the Company’s net loss of $699 for the year
	ended December 31, 2016.
	 
	Classification of Financial Instruments
	 
	Financial
	assets included in the statement of financial position are as
	follows:
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Loans and
	receivables:
 |  |  | 
| 
	   
	             
	 Cash
 | 
	 
	$
	3,916,283
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	8,610,996
	 
 | 
| 
	   
	               Other
	receivables
 | 
	 
	$
	271,284
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	243,639
	 
 | 
 
	 
	Financial
	liabilities included in the statement of financial position are as
	follows:
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Non-derivative
	financial liabilities:
 |  |  | 
| 
	   
	               Bank
	Loan
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	123,637
	 
 | 
| 
	   
	               Trade
	payable
 | 
	 
	$
	150,305
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	474,334
	 
 | 
| 
	   
	               Advance
	payable
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	   
	               Customer
	deposits
 | 
	 
	$
	169,500
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	447,071
	 
 | 
| 
	   
	               Shareholder
	loan
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	10,383
	 
 | 
| 
	   
	               Convertible
	loan
 | 
	 
	$
	243,676
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	   
	               Promissory
	Note
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	1,500,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Derivative
	Liability
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	   
	               Warrant
	derivative liability
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	3,655,686
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	563,481
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	6,271,111
	 
 | 
 
	 
	71
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Fair Value
	 
	The
	fair value of our financial assets and liabilities approximates the
	carrying amount. Financial instruments measured at fair value are
	classified into one of three levels in the fair value hierarchy
	according to the relative reliability of the inputs used to
	estimate the fair values. The three levels of the fair value
	hierarchy are:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	o
 | 
	 
	Level 1
	– Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
	assets or liabilities;
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	o
 | 
	 
	Level 2
	– Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the
	asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	o
 | 
	 
	Level 3
	– Inputs that are not based on observable market
	data.
 | 
 
	 
	The
	following is an analysis of our financial assets measured at fair
	value as at December 31, 2017 and 2016:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	As at December 31,
	 
	2017
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Level 1
 | 
	Level 2
 | 
	Level 3
 | 
| 
	Cash
	and cash equivalents
 | 
	$8,610,996
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	The
	following is an analysis of our financial assets measured at fair
	value as at December 31, 2016:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	As at December 31,
	 
	2016
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Level 1
 | 
	Level 2
 | 
	Level 3
 | 
| 
	Cash
	and cash equivalents
 | 
	$3,916,283
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY
	SECURITIES
	 
	 
	Not
	Applicable.
	 
	 
	72
	PART III
	 
	ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	 
	Not
	Applicable.
	 
	ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	 
	Our
	financial statements were prepared in accordance with IFRS, as
	issued by the IASB, and are presented in Canadian
	dollars.
	 
	Financial
	statements filed as part of this Annual Report:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Report
	of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated April 2,
	2018;
 | 
	F-1
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Statement of
	Financial Position as at December 31, 2017 and 2016;
 | 
	F-2
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Statement of
	Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2017 and
	2016;
 | 
	F-3
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Statements of
	Changes in Equity for the period from inception (February 16, 2015)
	to December 31, 2017;
 | 
	F-4
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Statements of Cash
	Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016;
	and
 | 
	F-5
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Notes
	to the Financial Statements.
 | 
	F-6
 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements
 | 
	F-29
 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	76
	 
	 
	 
	 
	DALE MATHESON CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP
	CHARTERED
	PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS
	 
	INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
	 
	To the
	Shareholders of Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp.
	 
	We have
	audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of
	Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp. which comprise the consolidated
	statements of financial position as at December 31, 2017 and 2016,
	and the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, changes in
	equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and a summary of
	significant accounting policies and other explanatory
	information.
	 
	Management's Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial
	Statements
	 
	Management
	is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these
	consolidated financial statements in accordance with International
	Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International
	Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as
	management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of
	consolidated financial statements that are free from material
	misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
	 
	Auditor’s Responsibility
	 
	Our
	responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
	financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits
	in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards.
	Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements
	and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
	whether the consolidated financial statements are free from
	material misstatement.
	 
	An
	audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
	the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
	statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s
	judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material
	misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due
	to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
	considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and
	fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order
	to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
	circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on
	the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also
	includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used
	and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management,
	as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated
	financial statements.
	 
	We
	believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is
	sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit
	opinion.
	 
	Opinion
	 
	In our
	opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
	all material respects, the financial position of Electrameccanica
	Vehicles Corp. as at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and its financial
	performance and its cash flows for the years then ended in
	accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as
	issued by the International Accounting Standards
	Board.
	 
	Emphasis of Matter
	 
	Without
	qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 1 in the
	consolidated financial statements which describes certain
	conditions that indicate the existence of a material uncertainty
	that cast significant doubt about Electrameccanica Vehicles
	Corp.’s ability to continue as a going concern. The
	consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
	that might result from this uncertainty.
	 
	/s/
	DALE MATHESON CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP
	 
	DALE
	MATHESON CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP
	 
	CHARTERED
	PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS
	 
	Vancouver,
	Canada
	 
	April
	2, 2018
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	F-1
	 
	 
	 
	Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp.
	Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
	(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
	 
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  |  | 
| 
	ASSETS
 |  |  |  | 
| 
	Current
	assets
 |  |  |  | 
| 
	Cash and cash
	equivalents
 | 
	 
	 
	4
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	8,610,996
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	3,916,283
	 
 | 
| 
	Receivables
 | 
	 
	 
	5
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	243,639
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	271,284
	 
 | 
| 
	Prepaid
	expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	920,146
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	249,585
	 
 | 
| 
	Inventory
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	232,903
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	10,007,684
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	4,437,152
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 
	Non-current
	assets
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Plant and
	equipment
 | 
	 
	 
	6
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,393,683
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	225,269
	 
 | 
| 
	Investment
 | 
	 
	 
	7
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	100,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Trademark and
	patents
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	23,175
	 
 | 
| 
	Goodwill and other
	intangible assets
 | 
	 
	 
	7
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,260,014
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	2,170
	 
 | 
| 
	TOTAL
	ASSETS
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	12,661,381
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	4,787,766
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	LIABILITIES
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Current
	liabilities
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Bank overdraft and
	demand loan
 | 
	 
	 
	9
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	123,637
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Trade payables and
	accrued liabilities
 | 
	 
	 
	8
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,123,790
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	468,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Customer
	deposits
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	447,071
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	169,500
	 
 | 
| 
	Convertible
	loan
 | 
	 
	 
	11
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	243,676
	 
 | 
| 
	Shareholder
	loan
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	10,383
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Promissory
	note
 | 
	 
	 
	7
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,500,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Deferred income
	tax
 | 
	 
	 
	7
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	149,794
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	3,354,675
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	881,176
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Non-current
	liabilities
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
|  | 
	 
	 
	12
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	3,655,690
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	TOTAL
	LIABILITIES
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	7,010,365
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	881,176
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	EQUITY
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Share
	capital
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	22,718,282
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	11,383,996
	 
 | 
| 
	Common share
	subscription
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	750,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	101,500
	 
 | 
| 
	Share-based payment
	reserve
 | 
	 
	 
	14
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	3,518,286
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	2,351,144
	 
 | 
| 
	Equity component
	reserve
 | 
	 
	 
	14
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	39,130
	 
 | 
| 
	Deficit
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(21,335,552
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(9,969,180
	)
 | 
| 
	TOTAL
	EQUITY
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	5,651,016
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	3,906,590
	 
 | 
| 
	TOTAL
	LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	12,661,381
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	4,787,766
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	The
	accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
	financial statements
	 
	Commitments
	(Notes 6 and 9)
	 
	Subsequent
	events (Note 21)
	 
	On
	behalf of the Board of Directors.
	 
	/s/ Steven A.
	Sanders
	                              
	            
	/s/ Luisa
	Ingargiola
 
 
	 
	 
	F-2
	 
	 
	1
	 
	Footnote: The warrant derivative liability is
	valued at fair value in accordance with International Financial
	Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). There are no
	circumstances in which the Company would be required to pay cash
	upon exercise or expiry of the warrants. See Note
	12.
 
	 
	 
	Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp.
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
	(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
	 
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	 
 |  |  |  | 
| 
	 
 |  |  |  | 
| 
	Revenue
 |  | 
	 
	$
	109,173
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Cost
	of revenue
 |  | 
	 
	 
	63,950
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Gross
	profit
 |  | 
	 
	 
	45,223
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
|  | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Operating
	expenses
 |  | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Amortization
 | 
	 
	 
	6
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	124,134
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	22,567
	 
 | 
| 
	General and
	administrative expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	15
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	2,373,251
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,205,835
	 
 | 
| 
	Research and
	development expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	16
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	4,430,386
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	2,778,295
	 
 | 
| 
	Sales and marketing
	expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	17
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	631,381
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	209,455
	 
 | 
| 
	Stock-based
	compensation expense
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	889,511
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,461,189
	 
 | 
| 
	Share-based payment
	expense
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,085,716
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	3,264,681
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(9,534,379
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(8,942,022
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Loss
	before other items
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(9,489,156
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(8,942,022
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Other
	items
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Accretion interest
	expense
 | 
	 
	 
	11
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	69,562
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	25,908
	 
 | 
| 
	Changes in fair
	value of warrant derivative
 | 
	 
	 
	12
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	186,269
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Finder’s fee
	on convertible loan
 | 
	 
	 
	11
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	258,542
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Impairment of
	goodwill
 | 
	 
	 
	7
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,342,794
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Foreign exchange
	loss
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	20,048
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	5,417
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Net
	and comprehensive loss
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	(11,366,372
	)
 | 
	 
	$
	(8,973,347
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Loss
	per share – basic and fully diluted
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	(0.35
	)
 | 
	 
	$
	(0.27
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Weighted
	average number of shares outstanding – basic and fully
	diluted
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	43,636,629
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	32,684,868
	 
 | 
 
	 
	The
	accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
	financial statements
	 
	F-3
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp.
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
	(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
	Years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
	 
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
	 
 |  |  |  |  |  | 
	 
	Share-based payment
	reserve
 |  |  |  | 
| 
	 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
	Balance
	at Dec 31, 2015
 |  | 
	 
	 
	26,783,625
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	458,520
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	50,000
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	354,015
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	(995,833
	)
 | 
	 
	$
	(133,298
	)
 | 
| 
	Shares issued for
	cash
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	13,575,200
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	8,375,519
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(1,604,486
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	6,771,033
	 
 | 
| 
	Share issued for
	finders fees
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,273,512
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	823,512
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	519,088
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,342,600
	 
 | 
| 
	Shares issued for
	convertible debt issue cost
 | 
	 
	 
	11,13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	26,250
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	26,250
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	16,852
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	43,102
	 
 | 
| 
	Share issued to
	settle debt
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	125,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	50,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	50,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Share-based
	payment
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	3,264,681
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	3,264,681
	 
 | 
| 
	Stock-based
	compensation
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,461,189
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,416,189
	 
 | 
| 
	Share
	subscription
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	51,500
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(10,000
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	41,500
	 
 | 
| 
	Equity component of
	convertible loan
 | 
	 
	 
	11
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	39,130
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	39,130
	 
 | 
| 
	Net and
	comprehensive loss for the year
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(8,973,347
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(8,973,347
	)
 | 
| 
	Balance
	at December 31, 2016
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	41,783,587
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	12,998,482
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	101,500
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(1,614,486
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	2,351,144
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	39,130
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(9,969,180
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	3,906,590
	 
 | 
| 
	Shares issued for
	cash
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	3,820,499
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	12,022,308
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(101,500
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(1,381,442
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	10,454,366
	 
 | 
| 
	Adjustment for
	warrant derivative liability
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(2,410,255
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(2,410,255
	)
 | 
| 
	Issuance of
	convertible debt
 | 
	 
	 
	11
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	130,439
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	130,439
	 
 | 
| 
	Shares issued for
	finders fees
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	214,009
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	709,521
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	3,223
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	712,744
	 
 | 
| 
	Shares issued upon
	conversion of convertible debt
 | 
	 
	 
	11,13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,620,114
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,657,845
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(169,569
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,488,276
	 
 | 
| 
	Shares and warrants
	issued to services
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	150,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	811,308
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	274,408
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,085,716
	 
 | 
| 
	Stock-based
	compensation
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	889,511
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	889,511
	 
 | 
| 
	Share
	subscription
 | 
	 
	 
	13
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	750,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(75,000
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	675,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Net and
	comprehensive loss for the year
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(11,366,372
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(11,366,372
	)
 | 
| 
	Balance
	at December 31, 2017
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	47,588,209
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	25,789,209
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	750,000
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	(3,070,928
	)
 | 
	 
	$
	3,518,286
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	(21,335,552
	)
 | 
	 
	$
	5,566,015
	 
 | 
 
	 
	The
	accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
	financial statements
	 
	During
	the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company completed a 1:5
	forward share split and all references to number of shares have
	been retroactively adjusted.
	 
	See
	Note 13 for further details.
	 
	F-4
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp.
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
	(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
	 
	 
| 
	 
 |  | 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Operating
	activities
 |  |  | 
| 
	Loss for the
	year
 | 
	 
	$
	(11,366,372
	)
 | 
	 
	$
	(8,973,347
	)
 | 
| 
	Adjustments
	for:
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Amortization
 | 
	 
	 
	124,134
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	22,567
	 
 | 
| 
	Stock-based
	compensation expense
 | 
	 
	 
	889,511
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,461,189
	 
 | 
| 
	Shares issued for
	services
 | 
	 
	 
	1,085,716
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	3,264,681
	 
 | 
| 
	Interest accretion
	expense
 | 
	 
	 
	69,562
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	25,908
	 
 | 
| 
	Finder’s fee
	on convertible loan
 | 
	 
	 
	258,542
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Impairment of
	goodwill
 | 
	 
	 
	1,342,794
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Impairment of
	trademark and patents
 | 
	 
	 
	19,174
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Change in fair
	value of warrant derivative
 | 
	 
	 
	186,269
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Changes in non-cash
	working capital items:
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Receivables
 | 
	 
	 
	93,210
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(242,645
	)
 | 
| 
	Prepaid
	expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	(657,713
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(202,238
	)
 | 
| 
	Inventory
 | 
	 
	 
	(44,092
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	14,966
	 
 | 
| 
	Trades payable and
	accrued liabilities
 | 
	 
	 
	568,850
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	325,090
	 
 | 
| 
	Customer
	deposits
 | 
	 
	 
	110,335
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	140,994
	 
 | 
| 
	Net
	cash flows used in operating activities
 | 
	 
	 
	(7,320,080
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(4,162,835
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Investing
	activities
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Expenditures on
	plant and equipment
 | 
	 
	 
	(1,264,265
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(232,027
	)
 | 
| 
	Purchase of
	Intermeccanica
 | 
	 
	 
	(900,000
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(100,000
	)
 | 
| 
	Cash received on
	business combination
 | 
	 
	 
	59,449
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Expenditures on
	trademarks and patents
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(25,345
	)
 | 
| 
	Net
	cash flows used in investing activities
 | 
	 
	 
	(2,104,816
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(357,372
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 
	Financing
	activities
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Proceeds from bank
	loan
 | 
	 
	 
	123,637
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Proceeds from
	convertible loans
 | 
	 
	 
	2,441,225
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	300,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Repayment of
	shareholder loans
 | 
	 
	 
	(33,155
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(135,000
	)
 | 
| 
	Proceeds from share
	subscription
 | 
	 
	 
	750,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	101,500
	 
 | 
| 
	Proceeds on
	issuance of common shares – net of issue costs
 | 
	 
	 
	10,837,902
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	8,063,633
	 
 | 
| 
	Net
	cash flows from financing activities
 | 
	 
	 
	14,119,609
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	8,330,133
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 
	Increase in cash
	and cash equivalents
 | 
	 
	 
	4,694,713
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	3,809,926
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Cash and cash
	equivalents, beginning
 | 
	 
	 
	3,916,283
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	106,357
	 
 | 
| 
	Cash
	and cash equivalents, ending
 | 
	 
	$
	8,610,996
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	3,916,283
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	The
	accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
	statements
	 
	Non-cash
	financing and investing transactions:
	 
| 
	Issuance of
	promissory note for acquisition of Intermeccanica
 | 
	 
	$
	1,500,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	F-5
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp.
	Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
	(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
	For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
	 
	1.
	Nature
	and continuance of operations
 
 
	 
	Electrameccanica
	Vehicles Corp (the “Company”) was incorporated on
	February 16, 2015, under the laws of the province of British
	Columbia, Canada, and its principal activity is the development and
	manufacture of electric vehicles. The Company acquired
	Intermeccanica International Inc. (“Intermeccanica”) on
	October 18, 2017, and its principal activity is the development and
	manufacture of high end custom built vehicles.
	 
	The
	head office and principal address of the Company are located at 102
	East 1
	st
	Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5T 1A4.
	 
	These
	consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the
	assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern,
	meaning it will continue in operation for the foreseeable future
	and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the
	ordinary course of operations. As at December 31, 2017 the
	Company’s principal activity, the development and manufacture
	of electric vehicles, is in the development stage, and the
	Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon
	the successful results from its electric vehicle development and
	manufacturing activities and its ability to attain profitable
	operations and generate funds there from and/or raise equity
	capital or borrowings sufficient to meet current and future
	obligations. It is anticipated that significant additional funding
	will be required. These factors indicate the existence of a
	material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt about the
	Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management
	intends to finance its operations over the next twelve months
	through private placement of equity capital. Should the Company be
	unable to continue as a going concern, the net realizable value of
	its assets may be materially less than the amounts on its statement
	of financial position.
	 
	2.
	Significant
	accounting policies and basis of preparation
 
 
	 
	The
	financial statements were authorized for issue on April 2, 2018 by
	the directors of the Company.
	 
	Statement of compliance with International Financial Reporting
	Standards
	 
	These
	consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
	with International Financial Reporting Standards
	(“IFRS”), as issued by the International Accounting
	Standards Board (“IASB”) and including interpretations
	of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee
	(“IFRIC”) as applicable to the preparation of annual
	financial statements.
	 
	Basis of preparation
	 
	The
	financial statements of the Company have been prepared on an
	accrual basis and are based on historical costs, modified where
	applicable. The Company’s functional and presentation
	currency is Canadian dollars.
	 
	Consolidation
	 
	The
	consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
	Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Intermeccanica from the
	date of its acquisition on October 18, 2017 (Note 7). Inter-company
	balances and transactions, including unrealized income and expenses
	arising from inter-company transactions, are eliminated on
	consolidation.
	 
	Significant estimates and assumptions
	 
	The
	preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS
	requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions concerning
	the future. The Company’s management reviews these estimates
	and underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis, based on experience
	and other factors, including expectations of future events that are
	believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Revisions to
	estimates are adjusted for prospectively in the period in which the
	estimates are revised.
	 
	Estimates
	and assumptions where there is significant risk of material
	adjustments to assets and liabilities in future accounting periods
	include the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities
	acquired from Intermeccanica, the estimated recoverable amount of
	goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets, the useful
	lives of plant and equipment, fair value measurements for financial
	instruments and share-based payments, and the recoverability and
	measurement of deferred tax assets.
	 
	F-6
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Significant judgments
	 
	The
	preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS
	requires the Company to make judgments, apart from those involving
	estimates, in applying accounting policies. The most significant
	judgments in applying the Company’s financial statements
	include:
	 
	•
	The assessment of
	the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and
	whether there are events or conditions that may give rise to
	significant uncertainty;
 
 
	 
	•
	the classification
	of financial instruments; and
 
 
	 
	•
	the calculation of
	income taxes require judgement in interpreting tax rules and
	regulations.
 
 
	 
	Share-based payments
	 
	Share-based
	payments to employees are measured at the fair value of the
	instruments issued and amortized over the vesting periods.
	Share-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair
	value of goods or services received or the fair value of the equity
	instruments issued, if it is determined the fair value of the goods
	or services cannot be reliably measured, and are recorded at the
	date the goods or services are received. The corresponding amount
	is recorded to the option reserve. The fair value of options is
	determined using a Black–Scholes pricing model. The number of
	options expected to vest is reviewed and adjusted at the end of
	each reporting period such that the amount recognized for services
	received as consideration for the equity instruments granted shall
	be based on the number of equity instruments that eventually
	vest.
	 
	Loss per share
	 
	Basic
	loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss attributable to
	common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares
	outstanding in the period. For all periods presented, the loss
	attributable to common shareholders equals the reported loss
	attributable to owners of the Company. Fully diluted loss per share
	is calculated by the treasury stock method. Under the treasury
	stock method, the weighted average number of common shares
	outstanding for the calculation of fully diluted loss per share
	assumes that the proceeds to be received on the exercise of
	dilutive share options and warrants are used to repurchase common
	shares at the average market price during the period.
	 
	Financial instruments
	 
	The
	Company classifies its financial instruments in the following
	categories: at fair value through profit or loss, loans and
	receivables, held-to-maturity investments, available-for-sale and
	financial liabilities. The classification depends on the purpose
	for which the financial instruments were acquired. Management
	determines the classification of its financial instruments at
	initial recognition. The Company has no financial instruments
	classified as fair value through profit or loss, held-to-maturity,
	or available for sale.
	 
	Loans
	and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or
	determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market and
	are subsequently measured at amortized cost. They are included in
	current assets, except for maturities greater than 12 months after
	the end of the reporting period. These are classified as
	non-current assets. Cash and accounts receivable are classified as
	loans and receivables.
	 
	Non-derivative
	financial liabilities (excluding financial guarantees) are
	subsequently measured at amortized cost. The Company’s
	non-derivative financial liabilities consist of trade payables,
	customer deposits, convertible loans, promissory note and
	shareholder loans. Derivative financial liabilities are measured at
	fair value and are subsequently valued at fair value through profit
	or loss. The Company’s derivative liability consists of
	warrants exercisable in currencies other than the Company’s
	functional currency.
	 
	Financial
	assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from
	the investments have expired or have been transferred and the
	Company has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of
	ownership. Financial liabilities are derecognized when the
	Company’s obligations are discharged, cancelled or
	expired.
	 
	At each
	reporting date, the Company assesses whether there is objective
	evidence that a financial instrument has been impaired. Any
	impairment is recorded in profit or loss. No impairment was
	required on the Company’s financial instruments.
	 
	The
	Company does not have any derivative financial assets.
	 
	F-7
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Impairment of assets
	 
	The
	carrying amount of the Company’s long-lived assets with
	finite useful lives (which include plant and equipment and
	intangible assets) is reviewed at each reporting date to determine
	whether there is any indication of impairment. If such indication
	exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order
	to determine the extent of the impairment loss. An impairment loss
	is recognized whenever the carrying amount of an asset or its cash
	generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment losses
	are recognized in the statement of comprehensive loss.
	 
	The
	recoverable amount of assets is the greater of an asset’s
	fair value less cost to sell and value in use. In assessing value
	in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their
	present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects the
	current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks
	specific to the asset. For an asset that does not generate cash
	inflows largely independent of those from other assets, the
	recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to
	which the asset belongs.
	 
	An
	impairment loss is only reversed if there is an indication that the
	impairment loss may no longer exist and there has been a change in
	the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. Any
	reversal of impairment cannot increase the carrying value of the
	asset to an amount higher than the carrying amount that would have
	been determined had no impairment loss been recognized in previous
	years.
	 
	Goodwill
	and other intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life are
	not subject to amortization and are tested annually for impairment,
	or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist.
	 
	Income taxes
	 
	Current income tax:
	 
	Current
	income tax assets and liabilities for the current period are
	measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the
	taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute
	the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted, at
	the reporting date, in the countries where the Company operates and
	generates taxable income. Current income tax relating to items
	recognized directly in other comprehensive income or equity is
	recognized in other comprehensive income or equity and not in
	profit or loss. Management periodically evaluates positions taken
	in the tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable
	tax regulations are subject to interpretation and establishes
	provisions where appropriate.
	 
	Deferred income tax:
	 
	Deferred
	income tax is recognized, using the asset and liability method, on
	temporary differences at the reporting date arising between the tax
	bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for
	financial reporting purposes. The carrying amount of deferred
	income tax assets is reviewed at the end of each reporting period
	and recognized only to the extent that it is probable that
	sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of
	the deferred income tax asset to be utilized. Deferred income tax
	assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are
	expected to apply to the year when the asset is realized or the
	liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have
	been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting
	period. Deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax
	liabilities are offset, if a legally enforceable right exists to
	set off current tax assets against current income tax liabilities
	and the deferred income taxes relate to the same taxable entity and
	the same taxation authority.
	 
	Cash and cash equivalents
	 
	Cash
	and cash equivalents include cash and short-term investments with
	original maturities of less than 90 days and are presented at cost,
	which approximates market value.
	 
	Inventory
	 
	Inventory
	consists of parts held for resale or for use in fixed fee contracts
	and is valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost
	is determined on the first-in, first-out basis.
	 
	Trademarks and patents
	 
	The
	Company expenses legal fees and filing costs associated with the
	development of its trademarks and patents.
	 
	F-8
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Plant and equipment
	 
	Plant
	and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated
	depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.
	 
	Subsequent
	costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or
	recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is
	probable that future economic benefits associated with the item
	will flow to the Company and the cost of the item can be measured
	reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognized.
	All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the statement of
	comprehensive loss during the financial period in which they are
	incurred.
	 
	Gains
	and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds
	with the carrying amount and are recognized in the statement of
	comprehensive loss.
	 
	Amortization
	is calculated on a straight-line method to write off the cost of
	the assets to their residual values over their estimated useful
	lives. The amortization rates applicable to each category of
	property, plant and equipment are as follows:
	 
	Class
	of plant and
	equipment                                                      
	Amortization
	rate
 
 
	 
	Office furniture
	and 
	equipment                                                      
	        
	20%
 
 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Leasehold 
	improvement                                           
	              
	over term of lease
 
 
	 
	 
	Production
	molds                                
	                                    
	per unit produced
 
 
	 
	Research and development costs
	 
	Research
	costs are expensed when incurred and are stated net of government
	grants. Development costs including direct material, direct labour
	and contract service costs are capitalized as intangible assets
	when the Company can demonstrate that the technical feasibility of
	the project has been established; the Company intends to complete
	the asset for use or sale and has the ability to do so; the asset
	can generate probable future economic benefits; the technical and
	financial resources are available to complete the development; and
	the Company can reliably measure the expenditure attributable to
	the intangible asset during its development. After initial
	recognition, internally generated intangible assets are recorded at
	cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment
	losses. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
	estimated useful life. The Company did not have any development
	costs that met the capitalization criteria for the year ended
	December 31, 2017 or 2016.
	 
	Revenue recognition
	 
	Revenue
	is recognized to the extent that the amount of revenue can be
	measured reliably and collection is probable
	.
	 
	Part sales:
	 
	Sales
	of parts are recognized when the Company has transferred
	significant risks and rewards of ownership to the customer which
	generally occurs upon shipment.
	 
	Services, repairs and support services:
	 
	Services,
	repairs and support services are recognized in the accounting
	period when the services are rendered.
	 
	Sales of vehicles:
	 
	The
	Company manufactures and sells custom built vehicles typically on
	fixed fee arrangements with its customers. Revenue is recognized in
	the accounting period in which the services are rendered, by
	reference to the stage of completion of the project. The stage of
	completion is determined as a percentage based on the amount of
	costs incurred compared to the estimated cost of completion.
	Revenue recognized in excess of amounts billed is recorded as
	accounts receivable. Deposits received in excess of work performed
	is recorded as deferred revenue.
	 
	F-9
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	3.
	Accounting
	standards issued but not yet effective
 
 
	 
	New standard IFRS 9 “Financial
	Instruments”
	 
	This
	new standard is a partial replacement of IAS 39 “Financial
	Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”. IFRS 9 uses a
	single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured
	at amortized cost or fair value, replacing the multiple rules in
	IAS 39. The approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages
	its financial instruments in the context of its business model and
	the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial
	assets.
	 
	The new
	standard also requires a single impairment method to be used,
	replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39. IFRS 9 is
	effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1,
	2018.
	 
	New standard IFRS 15 “Revenue from Contracts with
	Customers”
	 
	This
	new standard contains a single model that applies to contracts with
	customers and two approaches to recognizing revenue: at a point in
	time or over time. The model features a contract-based five-step
	analysis of transactions to determine whether, how much and when
	revenue is recognized. New estimates and judgmental thresholds have
	been introduced, which may affect the amount and/or timing of
	revenue recognized.  IFRS 15 is effective for annual periods
	beginning on or after January 1, 2018 with early adoption
	permitted.
	 
	New standard IFRS 16 “Leases”
	 
	This
	new standard replaces IAS 17 “Leases” and the related
	interpretative guidance. IFRS 16 applies a control model to the
	identification of leases, distinguishing between a lease and a
	service contract on the basis of whether the customer controls the
	asset being leased. For those assets determined to meet the
	definition of a lease, IFRS 16 introduces significant changes to
	the accounting by lessees, introducing a single, on-balance sheet
	accounting model that is similar to current finance lease
	accounting, with limited exceptions for short-term leases or leases
	of low value assets. Lessor accounting is not substantially
	changed. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on
	or after January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted for
	entities that have adopted IFRS 15.
	 
	The
	Company has not early adopted these new standards and is currently
	assessing the impact that these standards will have on its
	financial statements.
	 
	Other
	accounting standards or amendments to existing accounting standards
	that have been issued but have future effective dates are either
	not applicable or are not expected to have a significant impact on
	the Company’s financial statements.
	 
	4.
	Cash
	and cash equivalents
 
 
	 
	For the
	purposes of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents
	comprise the following balances with original maturity of less than
	90 days:
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Cash
 | 
	 
	$
	6,715,996
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	666,293
	 
 | 
| 
	Cash
	equivalent
 | 
	 
	 
	1,895,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	3,249,990
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	8,610,996
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	3,916,283
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	F-10
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Trade
	receivable
 | 
	 
	$
	154,698
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	GST
	receivable
 | 
	 
	 
	84,566
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	155,498
	 
 | 
| 
	IRAP contribution
	receivable
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	108,535
	 
 | 
| 
	GIC interest
	receivable
 | 
	 
	 
	4,375
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	6,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Other
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,251
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	243,639
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	271,284
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	F-11
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
| 
	 
 |  | 
	 
	Computer
 
	hardware
	and software
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
	 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
	Cost:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
	At December 31,
	2015
 | 
	 
	$
	16,438
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	16,438
	 
 | 
| 
	Additions
 | 
	 
	 
	27,771
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	18,897
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	173,213
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	12,146
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	232,027
	 
 | 
| 
	At December 31,
	2016
 | 
	 
	 
	44,209
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	18,897
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	173,213
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	12,146
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	248,465
	 
 | 
| 
	Additions
 | 
	 
	 
	246,634
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	54,775
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	216,837
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	89,055
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	914,060
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,521,361
	 
 | 
| 
	December 31,
	2017
 | 
	 
	 
	290,843
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	73,672
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	390,050
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	101,201
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	914,060
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,769,826
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Amortization:
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	At December 31,
	2015
 | 
	 
	 
	629
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	629
	 
 | 
| 
	Charge for the
	year
 | 
	 
	 
	6,483
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	2,514
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	11,666
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,904
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	22,567
	 
 | 
| 
	At December 31,
	2016
 | 
	 
	 
	7,112
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	2,514
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	11,666
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,904
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	23,196
	 
 | 
| 
	Charge for the
	year
 | 
	 
	 
	181,494
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	24,633
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	74,098
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	72,703
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	352,928
	 
 | 
| 
	At December 31,
	2017
 | 
	 
	 
	188,606
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	27,147
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	85,764
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	74,607
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	376,124
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Net
	book value:
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	At December 31,
	2016
 | 
	 
	$
	37,097
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	16,383
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	161,547
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	10,242
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	225,269
	 
 | 
| 
	At December 31,
	2017
 | 
	 
	$
	102,237
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	46,507
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	304,286
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	26,594
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	914,060
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	1,393,683
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	On
	September 29, 2017 the Company entered into a manufacturing
	agreement with Chongqing Zongshen Automobile Co., Ltd.
	(“Zongshen”). Under the agreement the Company agrees to
	reimburse Zongshen for the cost of prototype tooling and molds
	estimated to be CNY ¥9.5 million (CAD $1.8 million), which
	shall be payable on or before March 18, 2018, and mass production
	tooling and molds estimated to be CNY ¥29.3 million (CAD $6.0
	million), which shall be payable 50% when Zongshen commences
	manufacturing the tooling and molds, 40% when Zongshen completes
	manufacturing the tooling and molds, and 10% upon delivery to the
	Company of the first production vehicle. At December 31, 2017 the
	Company had paid 50% of prototype tooling and molds.
	 
	F-12
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Under
	the agreement, the Company agreed that the minimum purchase
	commitments for units of the Solo vehicle are to be as follows: in
	calendar 2018, 5,000; in 2019, 20,000; and in 2020, 50,000, and
	which shall be payable following issue of Company’s purchase
	orders as follows: 30% after Zongshen schedules production, and 70%
	after accepted vehicle delivery.
	 
	On
	October 16, 2017 the President and CEO of the Company (as
	“Pledgor”) entered into a Share Pledge Agreement
	(“Share Pledge”) to guarantee the payment by the
	Company for the cost of the prototype tooling and molds estimated
	to be CNY ¥9.5 million (CAD $1.8 million) to Zongshen through
	the pledge of 800,000 common shares of the Company. The Company
	approved its obligations under the Share Pledge and has agreed to
	reimburse the Pledgor on a one for one basis for any pledged shares
	realized by Zongshen.
	 
	7.
	Acquisition
	of Intermeccanica
 
 
	 
	On
	October 18, 2017 the Company completed the acquisition of all of
	the outstanding shares of Intermeccanica, a developer and
	manufacturer of high end custom built vehicles and the contract
	assembler of the Company’s electric vehicles located in
	Greater Vancouver, BC. The acquisition of Intermeccanica is
	expected to accelerate the Company’s manufacture and delivery
	of its vehicles to customers, and the Company will develop and
	manufacture electric versions of Intermeccanica’s custom
	built vehicles.
	 
	Total
	purchase consideration was $2,500,000. In addition to an initial
	payment of $100,000 in 2016, an additional $200,000 was paid prior
	to acquisition. On October 18, 2017 the Company paid $700,000, and
	entered into a Promissory Note (the “Note”) for the
	balance of $1,500,000. The Note bears interest at 5% per annum, and
	was payable in installments of $500,000 plus accrued interest on
	the 6
	th
	,
	12
	th
	and
	18
	th
	month
	after purchase. Under the Note if the Company raises at least $10
	million by way of equity or debt after October 18, 2017 the unpaid
	portion of the Note shall be paid within 30 days. The Promissory
	Note was secured over the assets of Intermeccanica. The Note was
	paid in full on January 28, 2018.
	 
	The
	following table summarizes the consideration paid for
	Intermeccanica, the fair value of identifiable assets acquired,
	liabilities assumed, goodwill and other intangible assets and an
	impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets.
	 
| 
	 
	Fair
	value of purchase consideration at October 18, 2017
 | 
| 
	Cash
 | 
	 
	$
	1,000,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Promissory
	note
 | 
	 
	 
	1,500,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Total
	consideration
 | 
	 
	$
	2,500,000
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	Fair
	value amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities
	assumed
 | 
| 
	Cash
 | 
	 
	$
	59,449
	 
 | 
| 
	Receivables
 | 
	 
	 
	65,565
	 
 | 
| 
	Prepaid
	expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	12,848
	 
 | 
| 
	Inventory
 | 
	 
	 
	188,811
	 
 | 
| 
	Plant and
	equipment
 | 
	 
	 
	24,282
	 
 | 
| 
	Intangible
	assets:
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Customer
	relationships
 | 
	 
	 
	87,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Contracted
	backlog
 | 
	 
	 
	23,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Non-compete
	covenants
 | 
	 
	 
	25,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Trade
	name
 | 
	 
	 
	423,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Trades payable and
	accrued liabilities
 | 
	 
	 
	(91,025
	)
 | 
| 
	Customer
	deposits
 | 
	 
	 
	(167,236
	)
 | 
| 
	Shareholder
	loans
 | 
	 
	 
	(43,538
	)
 | 
| 
	Deferred income
	tax
 | 
	 
	 
	(149,794
	)
 | 
| 
	Total net
	identifiable assets
 | 
	 
	 
	457,362
	 
 | 
| 
	Goodwill and other
	intangible assets
 | 
	 
	 
	2,042,638
	 
 | 
| 
	Total
 | 
	 
	$
	2,500,000
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	The
	Company performed an impairment test of the goodwill. The
	recoverable amount of the Intermeccanica cash-generating unit was
	determined to be $1,157,206 based on its fair value less costs to
	sell. The difference of $1,342,794 has been recorded as an
	impairment in net loss.
	 
	F-13
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Goodwill
	and other intangible assets recognized was primarily attributed to
	expected synergies arising from the Intermeccanica acquisition and
	the expertise and reputation of the assembled management and
	workforce. Goodwill is not expected to be deductible for income tax
	purposes. During the period from October 18, 2017 to December 31,
	2017 the Company did not record any amortization relating to the
	acquired intangible assets as the amortization amount was trivial.
	No further impairment was identified at December 31,
	2017.
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	Identifiable
	intangibles on acquisition
 |  |  |  | 
| 
	December 31, 2015
	and 2016
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	2,170
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	2,170
	 
 | 
| 
	Acquired in
	year
 | 
	 
	 
	558,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	2,042,638
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	2,600,638
	 
 | 
| 
	Impairment
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(1,342,794
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(1,342,794
	)
 | 
| 
	December 31,
	2017
 | 
	 
	$
	558,000
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	699,844
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	2,170
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	1,260,014
	 
 | 
 
	 
	The
	following unaudited supplemental pro-forma data presents
	consolidated information as if the acquisition been completed on
	January 1, 2017. The pro-forma financial information is presented
	for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the
	results of operations that would have been achieved if the
	acquisition had taken place at the beginning of 2017.
	 
| 
	Pro-forma
	information
 |  | 
| 
	Revenue
 | 
	 
	$
	947,600
	 
 | 
| 
	Gross
	Profit
 | 
	 
	 
	347,375
	 
 | 
| 
	Net and
	comprehensive loss
 | 
	 
	 
	(8,848,308
	)
 | 
 
	 
	Since
	October 19, 2017 Intermeccanica contributed revenue of $109,173
	from the sale of custom built vehicles and realized net income of
	$23,598.
	 
	F-14
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	8.
	Trade
	payables and accrued liabilities
 
 
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Trade
	payables
 | 
	 
	$
	457,520
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	70,401
	 
 | 
| 
	Wages
	payables
 | 
	 
	 
	62,110
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Due to related
	parties (Note 18)
 | 
	 
	 
	16,814
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	79,904
	 
 | 
| 
	Accrued
	liabilities
 | 
	 
	 
	587,346
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	317,695
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	1,123,790
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	468,000
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	 
	Intermeccanica,
	its President and his wife have a joint business line of credit
	with Bank of Montreal (BMO) with a limit of $200,000 that is
	payable on demand, bears interest at BMO’s personal line of
	credit base rate plus 1.5% and is secured by a general security
	agreement, a specific charge over a vehicle, and a charge over the
	personal home of the President and his wife. The balance
	outstanding at December 31, 2017 was $100,705 (2016 -
	$nil).
	 
	Lease
	obligations relate to the Company’s rent of office space and
	warehouse space. The term of the leases expire on November 1, 2020
	and July 1, 2020 with the Company holding an option to renew for a
	further five years for the office space.
	 
	As at
	December 31, 2017, future payments required under non-cancellable
	operating leases contracted for but not capitalized in the
	financial statements are as follows:
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Payable not later
	than one year
 | 
	 
	$
	310,034
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	221,071
	 
 | 
| 
	Payable later than
	one year and not later than five years
 | 
	 
	 
	507,036
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	601,542
	 
 | 
| 
	Payable later than
	five years
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	817,070
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	882,613
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	F-15
	 
	 
	 
	 
	10.
	Income
	tax expense and deferred tax assets and liabilities
 
 
	 
	A
	reconciliation of the expected income tax recovery to the actual
	income tax recovery is as follows:
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Net
	loss
 | 
	 
	$
	(11,366,371
	)
 | 
	 
	$
	(8,973,347
	)
 | 
| 
	Statutory tax
	rate
 | 
	 
	 
	26
	%
 | 
	 
	 
	26
	%
 | 
| 
	Expected income tax
	recovery at the statutory tax rate
 | 
	 
	 
	(2,955,257
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(2,333,070
	)
 | 
| 
	Stock-based
	compensation
 | 
	 
	 
	231,273
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,228,726
	 
 | 
| 
	Share issue cost
	and other
 | 
	 
	 
	488,227
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(231,643
	)
 | 
| 
	Effect of change in
	tax rate
 | 
	 
	 
	(149,561
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	SR&ED
	effects
 | 
	 
	 
	183,351
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Temporary
	differences not recognized
 | 
	 
	 
	2,385,319
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,335,987
	 
 | 
| 
	Income tax
	recovery
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	The
	Company has the following deductible temporary
	differences:
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Non-capital loss
	carry-forwards
 | 
	 
	$
	11,436,565
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	5,019,398
	 
 | 
| 
	Property, plant and
	equipment
 | 
	 
	 
	141,271
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	23,197
	 
 | 
| 
	Share issue
	costs
 | 
	 
	 
	1,983,154
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	737,637
	 
 | 
| 
	SR&ED
 | 
	 
	 
	1,397,672
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Other
 | 
	 
	 
	(558,000
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	14,400,662
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	5,780,231
	 
 | 
| 
	Deferred tax assets
	not recognized
 | 
	 
	 
	(14,955,454
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(5,780,231
	)
 | 
| 
	Deferred tax
	liability
 | 
	 
	 
	(554,794
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Deferred tax
	liability (tax effected at 27%)
 | 
	 
	$
	(149,794
	)
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
 
	 
	F-16
	 
	 
	 
	 
	The
	non-capital losses expire between 2035 and 2037.
	 
	 
	On July
	31, 2017 the unsecured convertible loan for $300,000, which was
	issued on September 7, 2016, was converted by the holder into units
	of the Company at a price of $1 per unit. Each unit consisted of
	one common share and one non-transferable common share purchase
	warrant with each warrant entitling the subscriber to acquire one
	additional share at a price of $2 per warrant share for a period of
	five years from September 7, 2016. Previously, on October 5, 2016,
	the Company issued 26,250 units at a price of $1 per unit with a
	fair value of $43,102 for third party finder’s fees regarding
	the convertible loan.
	 
	The
	loan was non-interest bearing. The fair value of the liability
	component was calculated using a market interest rate for an
	equivalent non-convertible loan, which the Company determined to be
	15%.  The residual amount, representing the value of the
	equity conversion option, was included in shareholders equity as
	the equity component of the convertible loan. The implicit interest
	rate for the convertible loan was 15% per annum. The carrying value
	of the liability component was being accreted to the face value of
	the convertible loan over the period from issuance to the maturity
	date of September 7, 2017.
	 
| 
	Unsecured
	Convertible Loan issued September 7, 2016
 |  |  | 
| 
	Balance,
	beginning
 | 
	 
	$
	243,676
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Proceeds from issue
	of convertible loan
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	300,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Amount allocated to
	equity on issue of convertible loan
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(39,130
	)
 | 
| 
	Convertible loan
	issue costs
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(43,102
	)
 | 
| 
	Interest accretion
	expense
 | 
	 
	 
	47,763
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	25,908
	 
 | 
| 
	Conversion to
	common shares (Note 13)
 | 
	 
	 
	(291,439
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Balance,
	ending
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	243,676
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	On July
	31, 2017 the Company issued an unsecured convertible loan in the
	amount of $1,000,034, convertible into units of the Company at a
	price of $1 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and
	one non-transferable common share purchase warrant with each
	warrant entitling the subscriber to acquire one additional share at
	a price of $2 per warrant share for a period of five years from
	July 31, 2017. On September 30, 2017, the Company issued 100,001
	common shares at a price of $1 per share with a fair value of
	$100,001 for third party finder’s fees regarding the
	convertible loan.
	 
	F-17
	 
	 
	 
	 
	The
	loan was non-interest bearing. The fair value of the liability
	component was calculated using a market interest rate for an
	equivalent non-convertible loan, which the Company determined to be
	15%. The residual amount, $130,439, representing the value of the
	equity conversion option, was included in shareholders equity as
	the equity component of the convertible loan. The implicit interest
	rate for the convertible loan was 15% per annum. The carrying value
	of the liability component was being accreted to the face value of
	the convertible loan over the period from issuance to the maturity
	date of July 31, 2018.
	 
	On
	September 29, 2017 the convertible loan was converted by the holder
	into 1,000,034 units of the Company at a price of $1 per
	unit.
	 
| 
	 
 
	Unsecured
	Convertible Loan issued July 31, 2017
 |  | 
| 
	Proceeds from issue
	of convertible loan
 | 
	 
	$
	1,000,034
	 
 | 
| 
	Amount allocated to
	equity on issue of convertible loan
 | 
	 
	 
	(130,439
	)
 | 
| 
	Debt issue
	costs
 | 
	 
	 
	(86,958
	)
 | 
| 
	Interest accretion
	expense
 | 
	 
	 
	21,799
	 
 | 
| 
	finder’s fee
	accretion
 | 
	 
	 
	14,533
	 
 | 
| 
	Conversion to
	common shares (Note 13)
 | 
	 
	 
	(818,969
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
 
	 
	On
	October 17, 2017 the Company issued an unsecured convertible loan
	for USD $1,152,289 (CAD $1,441,191), which is convertible by the
	holder into units of the Company at a price of USD $3.60 (CAD
	$4.4897) per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one
	non-transferable common share purchase warrant with each warrant
	entitling the subscriber to acquire one additional share at a price
	of USD $7.20 per share for a period of five years from date of
	issue. On November 27, 2017, the Company issued 32,008 common
	shares at a price of USD $6 (CAD $7.47) per share with a fair value
	of USD $192,048 (CAD $244,010) for third party finder’s fees
	regarding the convertible loan.
	 
	The
	convertible loan is denominated in US dollars; however, the
	functional currency of the Company is the Canadian dollar.
	Consequently, the value of the proceeds on conversion is not fixed
	and will vary based on foreign exchange rate movements. The
	convertible loan is therefore a derivative liability comprising a
	derivative liability relating to the conversion feature and
	derivative liability relating to the warrant and each are measured
	at fair value at each reporting period. Any changes in fair value
	from period to period are recorded as non-cash gain or loss in the
	consolidated statement of net loss and comprehensive loss. Upon
	issue the fair value of the conversion feature was $708,319 and the
	fair value of the warrants was $732,772. $100 was allocated to the
	loan.
	 
	F-18
	 
	 
	 
	 
	On
	November 27, 2017 the convertible loan for USD $1,152,289 (CAD
	$1,441,191) was converted by the holder into 320,080 units of the
	Company at a price of USD $3.60 (CAD $4.4897) per unit. Upon
	conversion the conversion feature was remeasured to fair value and
	$377,868 was credited to share capital, along with a gain on
	derivative liability of $330,551. Upon conversion, the warrants in
	the unit were also recorded as a derivative liability (Note
	12).
	 
| 
	 
 
	Unsecured
	Convertible Loan issued October 17, 2017
 |  | 
| 
	Proceeds from issue
	of convertible loan (USD $1,152,289)
 | 
	 
	$
	1,441,191
	 
 | 
| 
	Amount allocated to
	fair value of conversion feature
 | 
	 
	 
	(708,319
	)
 | 
| 
	Amount allocated to
	fair value of warrants
 | 
	 
	 
	(732,772
	)
 | 
| 
	Conversion to
	common shares (Note 13)
 | 
	 
	 
	(100
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	The
	exercise price of certain warrants is denominated in US dollars;
	however, the functional currency of the Company is the Canadian
	dollar. Consequently, the value of the proceeds on exercise is not
	fixed and will vary based on foreign exchange rate movements. The
	warrants are therefore a derivative and are required to be
	recognized as a derivate liability and measured at fair value at
	each reporting period. Any changes in fair value from period to
	period are recorded as non-cash gain or loss in the consolidated
	statement of net loss and comprehensive loss. Upon exercise, the
	holders will pay the Company the respective exercise price for each
	warrant exercised in exchange for one common share of the Company
	and the fair value at the date of exercise and the associated
	non-cash liability will be reclassified to share capital. The
	non-cash liability associated with any warrants that expire
	unexercised will be recorded as a gain in the consolidated
	statement of net loss and comprehensive loss. There are no
	circumstances in which the Company would be required to pay any
	cash upon exercise or expiry of the warrants.
	 
	During
	the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company issued 2,000,595
	warrants exercisable at prices from US$1 to US$11.70, expiring
	between September 30, 2019 to October 31, 2024.
	 
	A
	reconciliation of the changes in fair values of the derivative
	liability is below:
	 
|  |  | 
| 
	Balance,
	beginning
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Warrants
	issued
 | 
	 
	 
	3,469,421
	 
 | 
| 
	Changes in fair
	value of derivative liabilities
 | 
	 
	 
	186,269
	 
 | 
| 
	Balance,
	ending
 | 
	 
	$
	3,655,690
	 
 | 
 
	 
	The
	fair value of the warrants was calculated using a Black-Scholes
	Option Pricing Model. The weighted average assumptions used in the
	Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model are:
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Fair value of
	related warrants outstanding
 | 
	 
	$
	3,469,421
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	3,655,690
	 
 | 
| 
	Risk-free interest
	rate
 | 
	 
	 
	1.52
	%
 | 
	 
	 
	1.66
	%
 | 
| 
	Expected term (in
	years)
 | 
	 
	 
	3.04
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	2.44
	 
 | 
| 
	Expected share
	price volatility
 | 
	 
	 
	60
	%
 | 
	 
	 
	60
	%
 | 
 
	 
	 
	F-19
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Authorized share capital
	 
	Unlimited
	number of common shares without par value.
	 
	On June
	22, 2016, the Company completed a stock split of one pre-split
	common share for five post-split shares. All information related to
	common shares, options and warrants presented in these financial
	statements and accompanying notes have been retroactively adjusted
	to reflect the increased number of common shares resulting from the
	stock split.
	 
	Issued share capital
	 
	At
	December 31, 2017 the Company had 47,588,209 issued and outstanding
	common shares (2016 – 41,783,587).
	 
	During
	the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 13,575,200
	common shares for gross proceeds of $8,375,519, with unit prices
	ranging from $0.3634 to $1.00. As the fair value of certain units
	issued was less than the fair value a share-based payment expense
	of $3,264,681 was recorded. Share issue costs related to these
	issuances was $1,604,486 and includes 1,273,512 common shares
	issued for finder’s fees with a fair value of $823,512. The
	Company also received $51,500 as subscriptions for common
	shares.
	 
	During
	the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 26,250 common
	shares for finder’s fees with a fair value of
	$26,250.
	 
	During
	the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 125,000 common
	shares in partial settlement a shareholder loan in the amount of
	$50,000.
	 
	During
	the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 3,820,499
	common shares for gross proceeds of $12,022,308, with unit or share
	prices ranging from $0.15 to USD $6.00 (CAD $7.47). Share issue
	costs related to these issuances was $1,466,442 and includes
	214,009 common shares issued for finder’s fees with a fair
	value of $709,521. The Company also received $750,000 as a
	subscription for common shares at a price of $.85 per share (Note
	22).
	 
	During
	the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 150,000 common
	shares for services with a fair value of $811,308 and warrants to
	acquire 45,045 common shares for services with a fair value of
	$274,408.
	 
	During
	the year ended December 31, 2017, upon the conversion of
	convertible loans with a carrying value of $1,657,846 the Company
	issued 1,620,114 common shares (Note 11).
	 
	Basic and fully diluted loss per share
	 
	The
	calculation of basic and fully diluted loss per share for the year
	ended December 31, 2017 was based on the loss attributable to
	common shareholders of $11,366,371 (2016 $8,973,347) and the
	weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 43,636,629
	(2016 32,684,868). Fully diluted loss per share did not include the
	effect of stock options and warrants as the effect would be
	anti-dilutive.
	 
	Stock options
	 
	The
	Company has adopted an incentive stock option plan, which provides
	that the Board of Directors of the Company may from time to time,
	in its discretion, grant to directors, officers, employees and
	technical consultants to the Company, non-transferable stock
	options to purchase common shares, provided that the number of
	common shares reserved for issuance will not exceed 60,000,000.
	Such options will be exercisable for a period of up to 7 years from
	the date of grant. Options may be exercised no later than 90 days
	following cessation of the optionee’s position with the
	Company.
	 
	Options
	granted vest one-quarter on the first anniversary subsequent to the
	grant date and the remaining three-quarters vest in thirty-six
	equal monthly instalments commencing on the first anniversary of
	the grant date.
	 
	On
	exercise, each option allows the holder to purchase one common
	share of the Company.
	 
	F-20
	 
	 
	 
	 
	The
	changes in options during the years ended December 31, 2017 and
	2016 are as follows:
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	 
 |  | 
	 
	Weighted
	average exercise price
 |  | 
	 
	Weighted
	average exercise price
 | 
| 
	Options
	outstanding, beginning
 | 
	 
	 
	56,175,000
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	0.19
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	56,150,000
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	0.19
	 
 | 
| 
	Options
	granted
 | 
	 
	 
	1,120,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1.00
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	100,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	0.85
	 
 | 
| 
	Options
	exercised
 | 
	 
	 
	(12,500
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	0.15
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Options expired and
	forfeited
 | 
	 
	 
	(85,000
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	1.00
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(75,000
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	0.40
	 
 | 
| 
	Options
	outstanding, ending
 | 
	 
	 
	57,197,500
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	0.20
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	56,175,000
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	0.19
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	Details
	of options outstanding as at December 31, 2017 are as
	follows:
	 
|  | 
	Weighted
	average contractual life
 | 
	 
	Number
	of options
 
	 outstanding
 | 
	 
	Number
	of options
 
	 exercisable
 | 
| 
	 
	$
	0.15
	 
 | 
	4.45
	years
 | 
	 
	 
	45,000,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	29,062,500
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	$
	0.15
	 
 | 
	4.62
	years
 | 
	 
	 
	2,662,500
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,616,146
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	$
	0.40
	 
 | 
	4.94
	years
 | 
	 
	 
	8,400,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	4,375,000
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	$
	0.40
	 
 | 
	5.18
	years
 | 
	 
	 
	25,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	11,458
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	$
	1.00
	 
 | 
	5.47
	years
 | 
	 
	 
	50,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	19,792
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	$
	1.00
	 
 | 
	6.13
	years
 | 
	 
	 
	960,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	159,375
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	$
	1.00
	 
 | 
	6.61
	years
 | 
	 
	 
	100,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	4.57
	years
 | 
	 
	 
	57,197,500
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	35,244,271
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	The
	weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during
	the year ended December 31, 2017 was $0.74 (2016 $0.63). The fair
	value was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
	using the following weighted average assumptions:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	Year
	ended December 31, 2017
 | 
| 
	Expected life of
	options
 |  | 
| 
	Annualized
	volatility
 | 
	 
	 
	60
	%
 | 
| 
	Risk-free interest
	rate
 | 
	 
	 
	1.02% - 1.43
	%
 | 
| 
	Dividend
	rate
 | 
	 
	 
	0
	%
 | 
 
	 
	During
	the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized
	stock-based compensation expense of $889,511 (2016 -
	$1,461,189).
	 
	F-21
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Warrants
	 
	On
	exercise, each warrant allows the holder to purchase one common
	share of the Company.
	 
	The
	changes in warrants during the years ended December 31, 2017 and
	2016 are as follows:
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	 
 |  | 
	 
	Weighted
	average exercise price
 |  | 
	 
	Weighted
	average exercise price
 | 
| 
	Warrants
	outstanding, beginning
 | 
	 
	 
	18,533,587
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	1.64
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,933,625
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	0.66
	 
 | 
| 
	Warrants
	issued
 | 
	 
	 
	5,185,129
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	4.91
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	16,599,962
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1.75
	 
 | 
| 
	Warrants
	exercised
 | 
	 
	 
	(5,000
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	2.00
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Warrants
	outstanding, ending
 | 
	 
	 
	23,713,716
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	2.35
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	18,533,587
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	1.64
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	At
	December 31, 2017, all warrants outstanding were exercisable.
	Details of warrants outstanding as at December 31, 2017 are as
	follows:
	 
| 
	 
 
	 Exercise
	price
 | 
	Weighted
	average contractual life
 | 
	 
	Number
	of warrants outstanding
 | 
| 
	$0.40 CAD - $2.00
	CAD
 | 
	3.35
	years
 | 
	 
	 
	21,723,121
	 
 | 
| 
	$1.00 USD - $12.00
	USD
 | 
	0.26
	years
 | 
	 
	 
	2,000,595
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	The
	fair value of the warrants issued as part of the third party
	finder’s fee at issue date on March 29, 2017 was $3,223 as
	calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
	same assumptions used for stock options.
	 
	The
	fair value of the warrants issued for consulting services at issue
	date on September 30, 2017 was $274,407 as calculated using the
	Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted
	average assumptions:
	 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	Year
	ended December 31, 2017
 | 
| 
	Expected
	life of warrants
 |  | 
| 
	Annualized
	volatility
 | 
	 
	 
	60
	%
 | 
| 
	Risk-free
	interest rate
 | 
	 
	 
	1.52
	%
 | 
| 
	Dividend
	rate
 | 
	 
	 
	0
	%
 | 
 
	 
	 
	F-22
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Share-based payment reserve
	 
	The
	share-based payment reserve records items recognized as stock-based
	compensation expense and other share-based payments until such time
	that the stock options or warrants are exercised, at which time the
	corresponding amount will be transferred to share capital. If the
	options, or warrants expire unexercised, the amount remains in the
	share-based payment reserve account.
	 
	Equity component reserve
	 
	The
	equity payment reserve records items recognized as the equity
	component of convertible loans until such time that the loans are
	converted, at which time the corresponding amount will be
	transferred to share capital. If the loans are repaid, the amount
	remains in the equity payment reserve account.
	 
	15.
	General
	and administrative expenses
 
 
	 
	 
|  |  |  | 
| 
	Rent
 | 
	 
	$
	269,716
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	141,957
	 
 | 
| 
	Office
	expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	345,986
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	113,158
	 
 | 
| 
	Legal and
	professional
 | 
	 
	 
	912,347
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	643,725
	 
 | 
| 
	Consulting
	fees
 | 
	 
	 
	405,176
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	186,437
	 
 | 
| 
	Investor
	relations
 | 
	 
	 
	113,256
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Salaries
 | 
	 
	 
	326,770
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	120,558
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	2,373,251
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	1,205,835
	 
 | 
 
	 
	16.
	Research
	and development expenses
 
 
	 
| 
	  
	 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Labour
 | 
	 
	$
	1,971,946
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	1,715,562
	 
 | 
| 
	Materials
 | 
	 
	 
	2,763,355
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,266,730
	 
 | 
| 
	Government
	grants
 | 
	 
	 
	(304,914
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(203,997
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	4,430,387
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	2,778,295
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	F-23
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	17.
	Sales
	and marketing expenses
 
 
	 
| 
	  
	 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Consulting
 | 
	 
	$
	143,275
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	35,847
	 
 | 
| 
	Marketing
 | 
	 
	 
	182,723
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	93,345
	 
 | 
| 
	Salaries
 | 
	 
	 
	305,383
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	80,263
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	631,381
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	209,455
	 
 | 
 
	 
	18.
	Segmented
	information
 
 
	 
	The
	Company operates in two reportable business segments in
	Canada.
	 
	The two
	reportable business segments offer different products, require
	different production processes, and are based on how the financial
	information is produced internally for the purposes of making
	operating decisions. The following summary describes the operations
	of each of the Company’s reportable business
	segments:
	 
	●
	Electric Vehicles
	– development and manufacture of electric vehicles for mass
	markets, and
 
 
	 
	●
	Custom build
	vehicles – development and manufacture of high end custom
	built vehicles.
 
 
	 
	Sales
	between segments are accounted for at prices that approximate fair
	value. No business segments have been aggregated to form the above
	reportable business segments.
	 
| 
	 
 |  | 
	 
	Year
	ended December 31, 2016
 | 
| 
	 
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
	Revenue
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	109,173
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Gross
	profit
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	45,223
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Operating
	expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	9,473,794
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	60,585
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	8,942,022
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Other
	items
 | 
	 
	 
	1,879,208
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(1,992
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	31,325
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Net and
	comprehensive loss
 | 
	 
	 
	11,353,002
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	13,370
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	8,973,347
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Inventory
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	232,903
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Plant and
	equipment
 | 
	 
	$
	1,370,350
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	23,333
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	225,269
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
 
	 
	F-24
	 
	 
	 
	 
	19.
	Related
	party transactions
 
 
	 
	Related party balances
	 
	The
	following amounts are due to related parties
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Shareholder
	loan
 | 
	 
	$
	10,383
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Due to related
	parties (Note 7)
 | 
	 
	 
	16,814
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	79,904
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	27,197
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	79,904
	 
 | 
 
	 
	These
	amounts are unsecured, non-interest bearing and have no fixed terms
	of repayment.
	 
	Key management personnel compensation
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Consulting
	fees
 | 
	 
	$
	185,000
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	136,500
	 
 | 
| 
	Salary
 | 
	 
	 
	280,167
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	45,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Deferred salary for
	CEO
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	30,000
	 
 | 
| 
	Stock-based
	compensation
 | 
	 
	 
	659,228
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,238,013
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	1,124,395
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	1,449,513
	 
 | 
 
	 
	F-25
	 
	 
	 
	 
	20.
	Financial
	instruments and financial risk management
 
 
	 
	The
	Company is exposed in varying degrees to a variety of financial
	instrument related risks. The Board of Directors approves and
	monitors the risk management processes, inclusive of controlling
	and reporting structures. The type of risk exposure and the way in
	which such exposure is managed is provided as follows:
	 
	Credit risk
	 
	Credit
	risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will fail
	to discharge an obligation and cause the other party to incur a
	financial loss. The Company’s primary exposure to credit risk
	is on its cash and cash equivalents held in bank accounts. The
	majority of cash is deposited in bank accounts held with major
	financial institutions in Canada. As most of the Company’s
	cash is held by one financial institution there is a concentration
	of credit risk. This risk is managed by using major financial
	institutions that are high credit quality financial institutions as
	determined by rating agencies. The Company’s secondary
	exposure to risk is on its receivables. This risk is minimal as
	receivables consist primarily of government grant and refundable
	government goods and services taxes.
	 
	Liquidity risk
	 
	Liquidity
	risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its
	financial obligations as they fall due. The Company has a planning
	and budgeting process in place to help determine the funds required
	to support the Company’s normal operating requirements on an
	ongoing basis. The Company ensures that there are sufficient funds
	to meet its short-term business requirements, taking into account
	its anticipated cash flows from operations and its holdings of cash
	and cash equivalents.
	 
	Historically,
	the Company's source of funding has been shareholder loans and the
	issuance of equity securities for cash, primarily through private
	placements. The Company’s access to financing is always
	uncertain. There can be no assurance of continued access to
	significant equity funding.
	 
	The
	following is an analysis of the contractual maturities of the
	Company’s non-derivative financial liabilities as at December
	31, 2017 and 2016:
	 
| 
	At December 31,
	2017
 |  | 
	 
	Between
	one and five years
 |  | 
| 
	Bank
	loan
 | 
	 
	$
	123,637
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Trade
	payables
 | 
	 
	 
	474,334
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Customer
	deposits
 | 
	 
	 
	447,071
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Convertible
	loan
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Shareholder
	loan
 | 
	 
	 
	10,383
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Promissory
	note
 | 
	 
	 
	1,500,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	2,555,425
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
| 
	At December 31,
	2016
 |  | 
	 
	Between
	one and five years
 |  | 
| 
	Trade
	payables
 | 
	 
	$
	150,305
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Customer
	deposits
 | 
	 
	 
	169,500
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Shareholder
	loan
 | 
	 
	 
	243,676
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	563,481
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
 
	 
	Foreign exchange risk
	 
	Foreign
	currency risk is the risk that the fair values of future cash flows
	of a financial instrument will fluctuate because they are
	denominated in currencies that differ from the respective
	functional currency. The Company is exposed to currency risk as it
	incurs expenditures that are denominated in US dollars while its
	functional currency is the Canadian dollar. The Company does not
	hedge its exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange
	rates.
	 
	F-26
	 
	 
	 
	 
	The
	following is an analysis of Canadian dollar equivalent of financial
	assets and liabilities that are denominated in US
	dollars:
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Cash and cash
	equivalents
 | 
	 
	$
	5,596,635
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	98,762
	 
 | 
| 
	Trade
	payables
 | 
	 
	 
	(138,794
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(4,804
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	5,457,841
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	93,958
	 
 | 
 
	Based
	on the above net exposures, as at December 31, 2017, a 10% change
	in the US dollars to Canadian dollar exchange rate would impact the
	Company’s net loss by $545,784 (2016 - $9,396).
	 
	Interest rate risk
	 
	Interest
	rate risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a
	financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market
	interest rates. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its
	cash equivalents as these instruments have original maturities of
	twelve months or less and are therefore exposed to interest rate
	fluctuations on renewal. A 1% change in market interest rates would
	have an impact on the Company’s net loss of $18,950 for the
	year ended December 31, 2017 (2016 - $32,499).
	 
	Classification of financial instruments
	 
	Financial
	assets included in the statement of financial position are as
	follows:
	 
| 
	 
 |  |  | 
| 
	Loans and
	receivables:
 |  |  | 
| 
	  Cash
	and cash equivalents
 | 
	 
	$
	8,610,996
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	3,916,283
	 
 | 
| 
	  Other
	receivables
 | 
	 
	 
	243,639
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	271,284
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	8,854,635
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	4,187,567
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	Financial
	liabilities included in the statement of financial position are as
	follows:
	 
|  |  |  | 
| 
	Non-derivative
	financial liabilities:
 |  |  | 
| 
	Bank
	loan
 | 
	 
	$
	123,637
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Trade
	payable
 | 
	 
	 
	474,334
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	150,305
	 
 | 
| 
	Customer
	deposits
 | 
	 
	 
	447,071
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	169,500
	 
 | 
| 
	Convertible
	loan
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	243,676
	 
 | 
| 
	Shareholder
	loan
 | 
	 
	 
	10,383
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Promissory
	note
 | 
	 
	 
	1,500,000
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	Derivative
	financial liabilities:
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Warrant derivative
	liability
 | 
	 
	 
	3,655,686
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	6,2711,111
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	563,481
	 
 | 
 
	 
	 
	Fair value
	 
	The
	fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities
	approximates the carrying amount.
	 
	Financial
	instruments measured at fair value are classified into one of three
	levels in the fair value hierarchy according to the relative
	reliability of the inputs used to estimate the fair values. The
	three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
	 
	●
	Level 1 –
	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
	liabilities;
 
 
	 
	●
	Level 2 –
	Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset
	or liability either directly or indirectly; and
 
 
	 
	●
	Level 3 –
	Inputs that are not based on observable market data.
 
 
	 
	Financial
	liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 2017 consisted
	of the derivative liability, which is measured using level 3
	inputs.
	 
	F-27
	 
	 
	 
	 
	The
	fair value of the derivative liability was calculated using the
	Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model using historical volatility as
	an estimate of future volatility. At December 31, 2017, if the
	volatility used was increased by 10% the impact would be an
	increase to the derivate liability of $482,021 with a corresponding
	increase in the net and comprehensive loss.
	 
	 
	The
	Company’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as
	to safeguard the Company’s ability to maintain its business
	and sustain future development of the business. The capital
	structure of the Company consists of equity. There were no changes
	in the Company’s approach to capital management during the
	year. The Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital
	requirements.
	 
	 
	On
	January 5, 2018, the Company completed a private placement of
	1,000,000 common shares at a price of $0.85 per share for gross
	proceeds of $850,000. The Company incurred share issue costs of
	$85,000 relating to this private placement.
	 
	On
	January 5, 2018 the Company granted stock options to acquire
	835,000 common shares of the Company at an exercise price of USD
	4.80 per share for a period of 7 years. The options vest over a
	period of 4 years.
	 
	On
	January 5, 2018, the Company completed a private placement of
	400,000 units at a price of USD $4.20 per unit for gross proceeds
	of USD $1,680,000 (CAD $2,092,456). Each unit consists of one
	common share and one non-transferable common share purchase warrant
	with each warrant entitling the subscriber to acquire one
	additional share at a price of USD $8.40 per warrant share until
	January 21, 2019. The Company incurred share issue costs of USD
	$201,600 (CAD $248,874) relating to this private
	placement.
	 
	On
	January 28, 2018 the promissory note for $1,500,000 relating to the
	acquisition of Intermeccanica (Note 7) was paid in
	full.
	 
	On
	January 29 2018, the Company completed a private placement of
	114,274 common shares at a price of $5.18 per unit for gross
	proceeds of $591,941. On January 29, 2018, the Company issued 4,571
	common shares at a price of $5.18 per share for third party
	finder’s fees relating to this private placement.
	Additionally, the Company paid third party finder’s fees of
	$35,516 relating to this private placement.
	 
	On
	February 19, 2018 the Company issued 12,395 common shares pursuant
	the exercise of stock options at $1 per share for proceeds of
	$12,395.
	 
	F-28
	 
	 
	 
	UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED
	 
	FINANCIAL INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31,
	2017 
	 
	 
	Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp., (“EMV”) will account
	for the Acquisition as an acquisition under the purchase method of
	accounting. Pursuant to this method, the aggregate consideration
	paid by Electrameccanica in connection with the acquisition will be
	allocated to Intermeccanica International Inc. (“IMI”)
	assets and liabilities based on their fair values. IMI's assets,
	liabilities and results of operations will be consolidated with the
	assets, liabilities and results of operations of Electrameccanica
	after consummation of the acquisition.
	 
	We have presented below the Statement of Comprehensive Loss of
	Electrameccanica as December 31, 2017, assuming that the
	acquisition of IMI, had occurred as of January 1, 2017. The
	unaudited pro forma combined the Statement of Comprehensive Loss
	should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial
	statements and related notes and "Management Discussion and
	Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included
	elsewhere in this proxy statement.
	 
	The pro forma information is based on the historical financial
	statements of the Company, IMI after giving effect to the
	Acquisition and applying the estimates, assumptions and adjustments
	described in the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma
	combined the Statement of Comprehensive Loss..
	 
	The unaudited pro forma combined the Statement of Comprehensive
	Loss is for illustrative purposes only and should not be relied
	upon as indicative of the historical financial position that would
	have occurred had the acquisition of IMI happened as of the date
	indicated.
	 
	No pro-forma statement of financial position is presented below as
	the audited statement of financial position included in the audited
	financial statements of the Company at December 31, 2017 are
	included elsewhere in this registration statement and reflect the
	financial position of the combined entities at December 31,
	2017.
	 
	 F-29
	 
	 
	 
	UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COBMINED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE
	LOSS
	 
| 
	 
 |  | 
	 
	 
	 Year
	Ended December 31, 2017
 | 
| 
	 
 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
	 
 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
	Revenue
 | 
	 
	 
	1
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,179,595
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(501,461
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	678,134
	 
 | 
| 
	Cost
	of revenue
 | 
	 
	 
	2
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	758,948
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(385,971
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	372,977
	 
 | 
| 
	Gross
	profit
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	420,647
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(115,490
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	305,157
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Operating
	expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Amortization
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	26,142
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	122,468
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	148,610
	 
 | 
| 
	General and
	administrative expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	4
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	373,947
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	2,314,714
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(95,941
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	2,592,720
	 
 | 
| 
	Research and
	development expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	3
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	4,358,285
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(19,521
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	4,338,764
	 
 | 
| 
	Sales and marketing
	expenses
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	4,432
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	630,999
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	635,431
	 
 | 
| 
	Stock-based
	compensation expense
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	889,511
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	889,511
	 
 | 
| 
	Share-based payment
	expense
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,085,716
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,085,716
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(404,521
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(9,401,693
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(115,462
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(9,690,752
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Income/(Loss)
	before other items
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	16,126
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(9,401,693
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(28
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(9,385,595
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Other
	items
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Accretion interest
	expense
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	69,561
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	69,561
	 
 | 
| 
	Changes in fair
	value of warrant derivative
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	186,269
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	186,269
	 
 | 
| 
	Finder’s fee
	on convertible loan
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	258,542
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	258,542
	 
 | 
| 
	Impairment of
	goodwill
 | 
	 
	 
	5
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	-
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,342,794
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	1,342,794
	 
 | 
| 
	Foreign exchange
	(gain)/loss
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	(11,806
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	22,068
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	10,262
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	Net
	and comprehensive loss
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	27,932
	 
 | 
	 
	$
	(9,938,133
	)
 | 
	 
	$
	(1,342,766
	)
 | 
	 
	 
	(11,253,023
	)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
 
	 
	Pro Forma Adjustments
	 
	Note 1
	– Revenue adjustment related to the elimination of
	intercompany revenue for the year ended December 2017 was
	$501,461
	 
	Note 2
	– Cost of sales adjustment related to the elimination of
	intercompany cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2017 was
	$385,971.
	 
	Note 3
	– Expense adjustment related to the elimination of
	intercompany expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 was
	$95,941.
	 
	Note 4
	– Research and development expenses adjustment related to the
	elimination of intercompany research and development expenses for
	the year ended December 31, 2017 was $19,521.
	 
	Note 5
	- The Company performed an impairment test of the goodwill. The
	recoverable amount of the Intermeccanica cash-generating unit was
	determined to be $1,157,206 based on its fair value less costs to
	sell. The difference of $1,342,794 has been recorded as an
	impairment in net loss.
	 
	On
	October 18, 2017 the Company completed the acquisition of all of
	the outstanding shares of IMI, a developer and manufacturer of high
	end custom built vehicles and the contract assembler of the
	Company’s electric vehicles located in Greater Vancouver, BC.
	The acquisition of Intermeccanica is expected to accelerate the
	Company’s manufacture and delivery of its vehicles to
	customers, and the Company will develop and manufacture electric
	versions of Intermeccanica’s custom built
	vehicles.
	 
	Total
	purchase consideration was $2,500,000. In addition to an initial
	payment of $100,000 in 2016, an additional $200,000 was paid prior
	to acquisition. On October 18, 2017 the Company paid $700,000, and
	entered into a Promissory Note (the “Note”) for the
	balance of $1,500,000. The Note bears interest at 5% per annum, and
	was payable in installments of $500,000 plus accrued interest on
	the 6
	th
	,
	12
	th
	and
	18
	th
	month
	after purchase. Under the Note if the Company raises at least $10
	million by way of equity or debt after October 18, 2017 the unpaid
	portion of the Note shall be paid within 30 days. The Promissory
	Note was secured over the assets of Intermeccanica. The Note was
	paid in full on January 28, 2018.
	 
	 F-30
 
	 
	 
	 
	ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
	 
	The
	following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form
	20-F:
	 
|  | 
	 
 | 
|  | 
	Description
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	1.1
	 
 | 
	Notice of
	Articles
	(1)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	1.2
	 
 | 
	Articles
	(1)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	4.1
	 
 | 
	2015 Stock Option
	Plan
	(1)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	4.2
	 
 | 
	Joint Operating
	Agreement between the Company, Intermeccanica International Inc.
	and Henry Reisner, dated July 15, 2015
	(1)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	4.3
	 
 | 
	Amending Agreement
	to Joint Operating Agreement, between the Company, Intermeccanica
	International Inc. and Henry Reisner, dated September 19,
	2016
	(1)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	4.4
	 
 | 
	Executive Services
	Agreement between the Company and Jerry Kroll, dated July 1,
	2016
	(1)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	4.5
	 
 | 
	Executive Services
	Agreement between the Company and Ed Theobald, dated July 1,
	2016
	(1)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	4.6
	 
 | 
	Executive Services
	Agreement between the Company and Iain Ball, dated July 1,
	2016
	(1)
 | 
 
	 
| 
	 
	 
	4.7
	 
 | 
	Executive Services
	Agreement between the Company and Hurricane Corporate Services
	Ltd., dated July 1, 2016
	(1)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	4.8
	 
 | 
	Executive Services
	Agreement between the Company and Henry Reisner, dated July 1,
	2016
	(1)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	4.9
	 
 | 
	Executive Services
	Agreement between the Company and Mark West, dated November 1,
	2016
	(2)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	10.1
	 
 | 
	Share Purchase
	Agreement
	(3)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	10.2
	 
 | 
	Manufacturing
	Agreement between Chongqing Zongshen Automobile Co., Ltd. and the
	Company, dated September 29, 2017*+
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	10.3
	 
 | 
	Share Pledge
	Agreement between the Company and Jerry Kroll, dated October 16,
	2017
	(2)
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	11.1
	 
 | 
	Code of Conduct and
	Ethics
	*
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	  
	11.2
	 
 | 
	Insider Trading
	Policy*
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	12.1
	 
 | 
	Section 302(a)
	Certification of CEO
	*
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	12.2
	 
 | 
	Section 302(a)
	Certification of CFO
	*
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	13.1
	 
 | 
	Section 906
	Certifications of CEO
	*
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	13.1
	 
 | 
	Section 906
	Certifications of CFO
	*
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	15.1
	 
 | 
	Audit Committee
	Charter
	*
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	15.2
	 
 | 
	Nominating
	Committee Charter
	*
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	15.3
	 
 | 
	Compensation
	Committee Charter
	*
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	15.4
	 
 | 
	Corporate
	Governance and Human Resources Committee Charter*
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	15.5
	 
 | 
	Enterprise Risk
	Oversight Committee Charter*
 | 
| 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	15.6
	 
 | 
	Social Media
	Committee Charter*
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	15.7
	 
 | 
	Regulatory, Foreign Compliance & Government
	Affairs
	Committee
	Charter*
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
	 
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	15.8
	 
 | 
	Risk and Information Security
	Committee
	Charter*
 | 
 
	 
	________________________
	 
	 
	Notes:
	 
| 
	 
	 
	*
	 
 | 
	Filed
	herewith.
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	+
	 
 | 
	Portions
	of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for
	confidential treatment. Confidential information has been omitted
	from the exhibit in places marked “****”and has been
	filed separately with the SEC.
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	(1
	)
 | 
	Filed as an exhibit
	to our registration statement on Form F-1 as filed with the SEC on
	October 12, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference.
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	(2
	)
 | 
	Filed as an exhibit
	to our registration statement on Form F-1/A as filed with the SEC
	on December 20, 2016 and incorporated herein by
	reference.
 | 
| 
	 
	 
	(3
	)
 | 
	Filed as an exhibit
	to our report of foreign private issuer on Form 6-K as filed with
	the SEC on October 20, 2017 and incorporated herein by
	reference.
 | 
 
	 
	77