NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. NATURE OF BUSINESS
Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. (“Company”) was
incorporated in October 2007 under the laws of the State of Nevada
as Pole Perfect Studios, Inc. (“PPS”). From its
incorporation to November 2010, the Company was primarily engaged
in business start-up activities.
On November 23, 2010, we entered into and closed a Share Exchange
Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) between the major
shareholders of PPS and the shareholders of Torchlight Energy, Inc.
(“TEI”). As a result of the transactions effected by
the Exchange Agreement, at closing TEI became our wholly-owned
subsidiary, and the business of TEI became our sole business. TEI
was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada in June,
2010. We are engaged in the acquisition, exploitation and/or
development of oil and natural gas properties in the United States.
We operate our business through our subsidiaries Torchlight Energy
Inc., Torchlight Energy Operating, LLC, Hudspeth Oil Corporation,
Torchlight Hazel, LLC, and Warwink Properties LLC.
2. GOING CONCERN
At June 30, 2018, the Company had not yet achieved profitable
operations. We had a net loss of $3,266,323 for the six months
ended June 30, 2018 and had accumulated losses of $86,774,015 since
our inception. The Company had working capital as of June 30, 2018
of $2,046,688. We expect to incur further losses in the development
of our business. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern.
The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is
dependent on its ability to generate future profitable operations
and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its projected
development costs and repay its liabilities arising from normal
business operations when they come due. Management’s plan to
address the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern
includes: (1) obtaining debt or equity funding from private
placement or institutional sources; (2) obtaining loans from
financial institutions, where possible, or (3) participating in
joint venture transactions with third parties. Although management
believes that it will be able to obtain the necessary funding to
allow the Company to remain a going concern through the methods
discussed above, there can be no assurances that such methods will
prove successful.
These
consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the Company will continue as a going concern and therefore, the
financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the
possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of
assets or the amount and classifications of liabilities that may
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company maintains its accounts on the accrual method of
accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Accounting principles
followed and the methods of applying those principles, which
materially affect the determination of financial position, results
of operations and cash flows are summarized below:
Use of estimates
– The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and certain assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in these consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from
these estimates.
Basis of presentation
—The
financial statements are presented on a consolidated basis and
include all of the accounts of Torchlight Energy Resources Inc. and
its wholly owned subsidiaries, Torchlight Energy, Inc., Torchlight
Energy Operating, LLC, Hudspeth Oil Corporation, Torchlight Hazel
LLC, and Warwink Properties LLC. All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated.
These
interim financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding interim financial
reporting. Certain disclosures have been condensed or omitted from
these financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all
the information and notes required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America
(“GAAP”) for complete consolidated financial
statements, and should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2017.
In the
opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial
condensed consolidated financial statements include all
adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary
to fairly present the financial position as of, and the results of
operations for, all periods presented. In preparing the
accompanying financial statements, management has made certain
estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the
condensed financial statements and disclosures of contingencies.
Actual results may differ from those estimates. The results for
interim periods are not necessarily indicative of annual results.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior
period’s consolidated financial statements and related
footnotes to conform them to the current period
presentation.
Risks and uncertainties
–
The Company’s operations are subject to significant risks and
uncertainties, including financial, operational, technological, and
other risks associated with operating an emerging business,
including the potential risk of business
failure.
TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Concentration of risks
–
At times the Company’s cash balances are in excess of amounts
guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The
Company’s cash is placed with a highly rated financial
institution, and the Company regularly monitors the credit
worthiness of the financial institutions with which it does
business.
Fair value of financial instruments
– Financial instruments consist of cash,
receivables, payables and promissory notes, if any. The estimated
fair values of cash, receivables, and payables approximate the
carrying amount due to the relatively short maturity of these
instruments. The carrying amounts of any promissory notes
approximate their fair value giving affect for the term of the note
and the effective interest rates.
For assets and liabilities that require re-measurement to fair
value the Company categorizes them in a three-level fair value
hierarchy as follows:
·
|
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities.
|
·
|
Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities
in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly through market
corroboration.
|
·
|
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on management’s
own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair
value.
|
A financial asset or liability’s classification within the
hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement.
Cash and cash equivalents -
Cash and cash equivalents
include certain investments in highly liquid instruments with
original maturities of three months or less
Accounts receivable
–
Accounts receivable consist of uncollateralized oil and natural gas
revenues due under normal trade terms, as well as amounts due from
working interest owners of oil and gas properties for their share
of expenses paid on their behalf by the Company. Management reviews
receivables periodically and reduces the carrying amount by a
valuation allowance that reflects management’s best estimate
of the amount that may not be collectible. As of June 30, 2018 and
December 31, 2017, no valuation allowance was considered
necessary.
Oil and gas properties
–
The Company uses the full cost method of accounting for exploration
and development activities as defined by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Under this method of
accounting, the costs of unsuccessful, as well as successful,
exploration and development activities are capitalized as
properties and equipment. This includes any internal costs that are
directly related to property acquisition, exploration and
development activities but does not include any costs related to
production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. Gain
or loss on the sale or other disposition of oil and gas properties
is not recognized, unless the gain or loss would significantly
alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved
reserves.
Oil and gas properties include costs that are excluded from costs
being depleted or amortized. Oil and natural gas property costs
excluded represent investments in unevaluated properties and
include non-producing leasehold, geological, and geophysical costs
associated with leasehold or drilling interests and exploration
drilling costs. The Company allocates a portion of its acquisition
costs to unevaluated properties based on relative value. Costs are
transferred to the full cost pool as the properties are evaluated
over the life of the reservoir. Unevaluated properties are reviewed
for impairment at least quarterly and are determined through an
evaluation considering, among other factors, seismic data,
requirements to relinquish acreage, drilling results, remaining
time in the commitment period, remaining capital plan, and
political, economic, and market conditions.
Gains and losses on the sale of oil and gas properties are not
generally reflected in income unless the gain or loss would
significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and
proved reserves. Sales of less than 100% of the Company’s
interest in the oil and gas property are treated as a reduction of
the capital cost of the field, with no gain or loss recognized, as
long as doing so does not significantly affect the
unit-of-production depletion rate. Costs of retired equipment, net
of salvage value, are usually charged to accumulated
depreciation.
Capitalized interest –
The Company capitalizes interest on unevaluated
properties during the periods in which they are excluded from costs
being depleted or amortized. During six months ended June 30, 2018
and 2017, the Company capitalized $885,006 and $408,627,
respectively, of interest on unevaluated
properties.
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization
– The depreciable base for oil and natural
gas properties includes the sum of all capitalized costs net of
accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization
(“DD&A”), estimated future development costs and
asset retirement costs not included in oil and natural gas
properties, less costs excluded from amortization. The depreciable
base of oil and natural gas properties is amortized on a
unit-of-production method.
TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Ceiling test
– Future
production volumes from oil and gas properties are a significant
factor in determining the full cost ceiling limitation of
capitalized costs. Under the full cost method of accounting, the
Company is required to periodically perform a “ceiling
test” that determines a limit on the book value of oil and
gas properties. If the net capitalized cost of proved oil and gas
properties, net of related deferred income taxes, plus the cost of
unproved oil and gas properties, exceeds the present value of
estimated future net cash flows discounted at 10 percent, net of
related tax affects, plus the cost of unproved oil and gas
properties, the excess is charged to expense and reflected as
additional accumulated DD&A. The ceiling test calculation uses
a commodity price assumption which is based on the unweighted
arithmetic average of the price on the first day of each month for
each month within the prior 12-month period and excludes future
cash outflows related to estimated abandonment
costs.
The determination of oil and gas reserves is a subjective process,
and the accuracy of any reserve estimate depends on the quality of
available data and the application of engineering and geological
interpretation and judgment. Estimates of economically recoverable
reserves and future net cash flows depend on a number of variable
factors and assumptions that are difficult to predict and may vary
considerably from actual results. In particular, reserve estimates
for wells with limited or no production history are less reliable
than those based on actual production. Subsequent re-evaluation of
reserves and cost estimates related to future development of proved
oil and gas reserves could result in significant revisions to
proved reserves. Other issues, such as changes in regulatory
requirements, technological advances, and other factors which are
difficult to predict could also affect estimates of proved reserves
in the future.
Asset retirement obligations
– The fair value of a liability for an
asset’s retirement obligation (“ARO”) is
recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable
estimate of fair value can be made, with the corresponding charge
capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the related
long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its then-present
value each subsequent period, and the capitalized cost is depleted
over the useful life of the related asset. Abandonment costs
incurred are recorded as a reduction of the ARO
liability.
Inherent in the fair value calculation of an ARO are numerous
assumptions and judgments including the ultimate settlement
amounts, inflation factors, credit adjusted discount rates, timing
of settlement, and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental,
and political environments. To the extent future revisions to these
assumptions impact the fair value of the existing ARO liability, a
corresponding adjustment is made to the oil and gas property
balance. Settlements greater than or less than amounts accrued as
ARO are recorded as a gain or loss upon settlement.
Income taxes
-
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and
liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and
operating loss carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation
allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets if it is
more likely than not that the related tax benefits will not be
realized.
Authoritative guidance for uncertainty in income taxes requires
that the Company recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax
position only after determining that the relevant tax authority
would more likely than not sustain the position following an
examination. Management has reviewed the Company’s tax
positions and determined there were no uncertain tax positions
requiring recognition in the consolidated financial statements.
Company tax returns remain subject to Federal and State tax
examinations. Generally, the applicable statutes of limitation are
three to four years from their respective filings.
Estimated interest and penalties related to potential underpayment
on any unrecognized tax benefits are classified as a component of
tax expense in the statement of operation. The Company has not
recorded any interest or penalties associated with unrecognized tax
benefits for any periods covered by these financial
statements.
Share-based compensation
– Compensation cost for equity awards is
based on the fair value of the equity instrument on the date of
grant and is recognized over the period during which an employee is
required to provide service in exchange for the award. Compensation
cost for liability awards is based on the fair value of the vested
award at the end of each period.
The
Company accounts for stock option awards using the calculated value
method. The expected term was derived using the simplified method
provided in Securities and Exchange Commission release Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 110, which averages an awards weighted
average vesting period and contractual term for “plain
vanilla” share options.
The
Company accounts for any forfeitures of options when they occur.
Previously recognized compensation cost for an award is reversed in
the period that the award is forfeited.
The
Company also issues equity awards to non-employees. The fair value
of these option awards is estimated when the award recipient
completes the contracted professional services. The Company
recognizes expense for the estimated total value of the awards
during the period from their issuance until performance completion,
at which time the estimated expense is adjusted to the final value
of the award as measured at performance completion.
The
Company values warrant and option awards using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model.
TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Revenue recognition
–
On
January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers, and the related guidance in ASC 340-40
(the new revenue standard), and related guidance on gains and
losses on derecognition of nonfinancial assets ASC 610-20, using
the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts which
were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Under the modified
retrospective method, the Company recognizes the cumulative effect
of initially applying the new revenue standard as an adjustment to
the opening balance of retained earnings; however, no significant
adjustment was required as a result of adopting the new revenue
standard. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1,
2018 are presented under the new revenue standard. The comparative
information has not been restated and continues to be reported
under the historic accounting standards in effect for those
periods. The impact of the adoption of the new revenue standard is
expected to be immaterial to the Company’s net income on an
ongoing basis.
The Company’s revenue is typically generated from contracts
to sell natural gas, crude oil or NGLs produced from interests in
oil and gas properties
owned by the Company. Contracts for the sale of
natural gas and crude oil are evidenced by (1) base contracts for
the sale and purchase of natural gas or crude oil, which document
the general terms and conditions for the sale, and (2) transaction
confirmations, which document the terms of each specific sale. The
transaction confirmations specify a delivery point which represents
the point at which control of the product is transferred to the
customer. These contracts frequently meet the definition of a
derivative under ASC 815, and are accounted for as derivatives
unless the Company elects to treat them as normal sales as
permitted under that guidance. The Company elects to treat
contracts to sell oil and gas production as normal sales, which are
then accounted for as contracts with customers. The Company has
determined that these contracts represent multiple performance
obligations which are satisfied when control of the commodity
transfers to the customer, typically through the delivery of the
specified commodity to a designated delivery
point.
Revenue is measured based on consideration specified in the
contract with the customer, and excludes any amounts collected on
behalf of third parties.
The Company recognizes revenue in the amount that
reflects the consideration it expects to be entitled to in exchange
for transferring control of those goods to the customer. Amounts
allocated in the Company’s price contracts are based on the
standalone selling price of those products in the context of
long-term contracts. Payment is generally received one or two
months after the sale has occurred.
Gain or loss on derivative instruments is outside the scope of ASC
606 and is not considered revenue from contracts with customers
subject to ASC 606. The Company may in the future use financial or
physical contracts accounted for as derivatives as economic hedges
to manage price risk associated with normal sales, or in limited
cases may use them for contracts the Company intends to physically
settle but do not meet all of the criteria to be treated as normal
sales.
Producer Gas Imbalances.
The
Company applies the sales method of accounting for natural gas
revenue. Under this method, revenues are recognized based on the
actual volume of natural gas sold to
purchasers.
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
–
Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed
by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed in the
same way as basic earnings (loss) per common share except that the
denominator is increased to include the number of additional common
shares that would be outstanding if all potential common shares had
been issued and if the additional common shares were
dilutive.
The calculation of diluted earnings per share
excludes 18,530,356 shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding warrants and options because their effect would be
anti-dilutive.
Environmental laws and regulations
– The Company is subject to extensive
federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on
their future economic benefit. The Company believes that it is in
compliance with existing laws and regulations.
Recent accounting pronouncements
–
In February 2016 the FASB, issued
ASU, 2016-02, Leases. The ASU requires companies to recognize on
the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and
obligations created by leased assets. ASU 2016-02 will be effective
for the Company in the first quarter of 2019, with early adoption
permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the
adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation-Stock
Compensation, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment
Accounting. ASU 2018-07 expands the scope of to include share-based
payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from
nonemployees. ASU 2018-07 will become effective for the
Company on January 1, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its
consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures.
Other recently issued or adopted accounting pronouncements are not
expected to have, or did not have, a material impact on the
Company’s financial position or results from
operations.
Subsequent events –
The
Company evaluated subsequent events through
August 9,
2018
, the date of issuance of the
financial statements. Subsequent events are disclosed in Note
11.
TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
4. OIL & GAS PROPERTIES
The following table presents the capitalized costs for oil &
gas properties of the Company as of June 30, 2018 and December 31,
2017:
Evaluated
costs subject to amortization
|
$
5,035,285
|
$
5,022,129
|
Unevaluated
costs
|
33,618,930
|
26,100,749
|
Total
capitalized costs
|
38,654,215
|
31,122,878
|
Less
accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
(5,939,608
)
|
(5,543,599
)
|
Total
oil and gas properties
|
$
32,714,607
|
$
25,579,279
|
Unevaluated costs as of June 30, 2018 include cumulative costs on
developing projects including the Orogrande, Hazel, and Winkler
projects in West Texas.
The Company identified impairment of $2,300,626 in 2017 related to
its unevaluated properties. Although we had no recognized
impairment expense in 2017, the Company has adjusted the separation
of evaluated versus unevaluated costs within its full cost pool to
recognize the value impairment related to the expiration of
unevaluated leases in 2017 in the amount of $2,300,626. The impact
of this change will be to increase the basis for calculation of
future period’s depletion, depreciation and amortization to
include $2,300,626 of cost which will effectively recognize the
impairment on the Consolidated Statement of Operations over future
periods. The $2,300,626 has also become an evaluated cost for
purposes of future period’s Ceiling Tests and which may
further recognize the impairment expense recognized in future
periods. The impact of this cost reclassification at March 31, 2018
was a recognized impairment expense of $139,891. No impairment
adjustment was required at June 30, 2018.
Due to the volatility of commodity prices, should oil and natural
gas prices decline in the future, it is possible that a further
write-down could occur. Proved reserves are estimated quantities of
crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, which geological
and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recoverable from known reservoirs under existing economic and
operating conditions. The independent engineering estimates include
only those amounts considered to be proved reserves and do not
include additional amounts which may result from new discoveries in
the future, or from application of secondary and tertiary recovery
processes where facilities are not in place or for which
transportation and/or marketing contracts are not in place.
Estimated reserves to be developed through secondary or tertiary
recovery processes are classified as unevaluated
properties.
Acquisition of Additional Interests in Hazel Project
On January 30, 2017, we and our then wholly-owned subsidiary,
Torchlight Acquisition Corporation, a Texas corporation
(“TAC”), entered into and closed an Agreement and Plan
of Reorganization and a Plan of Merger with Line Drive Energy, LLC,
a Texas limited liability company (“Line Drive”), and
Mr. Gregory McCabe, our Chairman, under which agreements TAC merged
with and into Line Drive and the separate existence of TAC ceased,
with Line Drive being the surviving entity and becoming our
wholly-owned subsidiary. Line Drive, which was wholly-owned by Mr.
McCabe, our Chairman, owned certain assets and securities,
including approximately 40.66% of 12,000 gross acres, 9,600 net
acres, in the Hazel Project and 521,739 warrants to purchase shares
of our common stock (which warrants had been assigned by Mr. McCabe
to Line Drive). Upon the closing of the merger, all of the issued
and outstanding shares of common stock of TAC automatically
converted into a membership interest in Line Drive, constituting
all of the issued and outstanding membership interests in Line
Drive immediately following the closing of the merger, the
membership interest in Line Drive held by Mr. McCabe and
outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the merger ceased
to exist, and we issued Mr. McCabe 3,301,739 restricted shares of
our common stock as consideration therefor. Immediately after
closing, the 521,739 warrants held by Line Drive were cancelled,
which warrants had an exercise price of $1.40 per share and an
expiration date of June 9, 2020. A Certificate of Merger for the
merger transaction was filed with the Secretary of State of Texas
on January 31, 2017. Subsequent to the closing, the name of Line
Drive Energy, LLC was changed to Torchlight Hazel, LLC. We are
required to drill one well every six months to hold the entire
12,000 acre block for eighteen months, and thereafter two wells
every six months effective June 2018.
Also on
January 30, 2017, TEI entered into and closed a Purchase and Sale
Agreement with Wolfbone. Under the agreement, TEI acquired certain
of Wolfbone’s Hazel Project assets, including its interest in
the Flying B Ranch #1 well and the 40 acre unit surrounding the
well, for consideration of $415,000, and additionally, Wolfbone
caused to be cancelled a total of 2,780,000 warrants to purchase
shares of our common stock, including 1,500,000 warrants held by
McCabe Petroleum Corporation, an entity owned by Mr. McCabe and
1,280,000 warrants held by Green Hill Minerals, an entity owned by
Mr. McCabe’s son, which warrant cancellations were effected
through certain Warrant Cancellation Agreements. The 1,500,000
warrants held by MPC that were cancelled had an exercise price of
$1.00 per share and an expiration date of April 4, 2021. The
warrants held by Green Hill Minerals that were cancelled included
100,000 warrants with an exercise price of $1.73 and an expiration
date of September 30, 2018 and 1,180,000 warrants with an exercise
price of $0.70 and an expiration date of February 15,
2020.
TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
4. OIL & GAS PROPERTIES (CONTINUED)
Since
Mr. McCabe held the controlling interest in both Line Drive and
Wolfbone, the transactions were combined for accounting purposes.
The working interest in the Hazel Project was the only asset held
by Line Drive. The warrant cancellation was treated in the
aggregate as an exercise of the warrants with the transfer of the
working interests as the consideration. We recorded the
transactions as an increase in its investment in the Hazel Project
working interests of $3,644,431, which is equal to the exercise
price of the warrants plus the cash paid to Wolfbone.
Upon
the closing of the transactions, our working interest in the Hazel
Project increased by 40.66% to a total ownership of
74%.
Effective
June 1, 2017, we acquired an additional 6% working interest from
unrelated working interest owners in exchange for 268,656 shares of
common stock valued at $373,430, increasing our working interest in
the Hazel project to 80%, and an overall net revenue interest of
74-75%.
In
April 2018, we announced that we have commenced a process that
could result in the monetization of the Hazel Project. We believe
the development activity at the Hazel Project, coupled with nearby
activities of other oil and gas operators, suggests that this
project has achieved a level of value worth monetizing. We
anticipate that the liquidity that would be provided from selling
the Hazel Project could be redeployed into the Orogrande
Project.
Winkler Project, Winkler County, Texas
On December 1, 2017, the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization that
we and our then wholly-owned subsidiary, Torchlight Wolfbone
Properties, Inc., a Texas corporation (“TWP”), entered
into with MPC and Warwink Properties, LLC (Warwink Properties) on
November 14, 2017 closed. Under the agreement, TWP merged with and
into Warwink Properties and the separate existence of TWP ceased,
with Warwink Properties being the surviving entity and becoming our
wholly-owned subsidiary. Warwink Properties was wholly owned by
MPC. Warwink Properties owns certain assets, including a 10.71875%
working interest in approximately 640 acres in Winkler County,
Texas. Upon the closing of the merger, all of the issued and
outstanding shares of common stock of TWP converted into a
membership interest in Warwink Properties, constituting all of the
issued and outstanding membership interests in Warwink Properties
immediately following the closing of the merger, the membership
interest in Warwink Properties held by MPC and outstanding
immediately prior to the closing of the merger ceased to exist, and
we issued MPC 2,500,000 restricted shares of our common stock as
consideration. Also on December 1, 2017, MPC closed its transaction
with MECO IV, LLC (“MECO”) for the purchase and sale of
certain assets as contemplated by the Purchase and Sale Agreement
dated November 9, 2017 among MPC, MECO and additional parties
thereto, or the MECO PSA, to which we are not a party. Under the
MECO PSA, Warwink Properties received a carry from MECO (through
the tanks) of up to $1,475,000 in the next well drilled on the
Winkler County leases. A Certificate of Merger for the merger
transaction was filed with the Secretary of State of Texas on
December 5, 2017.
Also on
December 1, 2017, the transactions contemplated by the Purchase
Agreement that TEI entered into with MPC closed. Under the Purchase
Agreement, which was entered into on November 14, 2017, TEI
acquired beneficial ownership of certain of MPC’s assets,
including acreage and wellbores located in Ward County, Texas,
(“the Ward County Assets”). As consideration under the
Purchase Agreement, at closing TEI issued to MPC an unsecured
promissory note in the principal amount of $3,250,000, payable in
monthly installments of interest only beginning on January 1, 2018,
at the rate of 5% per annum, with the entire principal amount
together with all accrued interest due and payable on January 1,
2021. In connection with TEI’s acquisition of beneficial
ownership in the Ward County Assets, MPC sold those same assets, on
behalf of TEI, to MECO at closing of the MECO PSA, and accordingly,
TEI received $3,250,000 in cash for its beneficial interest in the
Ward County Assets. Additionally, at closing of the MECO PSA, MPC
paid TEI a performance fee of $2,781,500 in cash as compensation
for TEI’s marketing and selling the Winkler County assets of
MPC and the Ward County Assets as a package to MECO.
MECO
expects to drill two gross horizontal well in this project in 2018.
The first well was spudded on May 7, 2018.
Addition to the Winkler Project
As of
May 7, 2018, our Winkler project in the Delaware Basin has begun
the drilling phase of the first Winkler Project well, the UL 21
War-Wink 47 #2H. Our operating partner, MECO had begun the pilot
hole on the project. The plan is to evaluate the various potential
zones for a lateral leg to be drilled once logging is completed. We
expect the most likely target to be the Wolfcamp A interval. The
well is on 320 newly acquired acres offsetting the original
leasehold we entered into in December, 2017. The additional acreage
was leased by our operating partner under the Area of Mutual
Interest Agreement (AMI) and we recently exercised our right to
participate for its 12.5% in the additional 1,080 gross acres at a
cash cost of $447,847. Our carried interest in the first well, as
outlined in the agreement, was originally planned to be on the
first acreage acquired. That carried interest is being applied to
this new well and will allow MECO to drill and produce potential
revenues sooner than originally planned. The primary leasehold is a
320-acre block directly west of the current position and will allow
for 5,000-foot lateral wells to be drilled.
Reference
is made to Note 11, “Subsequent Events” below,
regarding the acquisition of additional interest in the oil and gas
leases in the Orogrande Project.
TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
5. RELATED PARTY PAYABLES
As of June 30, 2018, related party payables consisted of accrued
and unpaid compensation to one of our executive officers totaling
$45,000.
6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases
The
Company has a noncancelable lease for its office premises that
expires on November 30, 2019 and which requires the payment of base
lease amounts and executory costs such as taxes, maintenance and
insurance. Rental expense for the lease was $48,330 and $39,912 for
the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
Approximate
future minimum rental commitments under the office premises lease
are:
|
|
|
|
2018
|
$
48,330
|
To
2019 Expiration
|
88,605
|
Total
|
$
136,935
|
Environmental matters
The Company is subject to contingencies as a result of
environmental laws and regulations. Present and future
environmental laws and regulations applicable to the
Company’s operations could require substantial capital
expenditures or could adversely affect its operations in other ways
that cannot be predicted at this time. As of June 30, 2018 and
December 31, 2017, no amounts had been recorded because no specific
liability has been identified that is reasonably probable of
requiring the Company to fund any future material
amounts.
Legal Proceeding
We had pending in the 429th judicial district court in Collin
County, Texas a lawsuit against Husky, Charles V. Long, Silverstar
of Nevada, Inc., Gastar Exploration Inc., J. Russell Porter,
Michael A. Gerlich, and Jerry R. Schuyler that was originally filed
in May 2016. In the lawsuit, we allege, among other things,
that the defendants acted improperly in connection with multiple
transactions, and that the defendants misrepresented and omitted
material information to us with respect to these transactions.
Husky filed a counterclaim against us and TEI, and a
third-party petition against John Brda, our Chief Executive
Officer, President, Secretary and a member of our board of
directors, and Willard McAndrew III, a former officer of our
company, which we refer to as the “Husky Counterclaim”.
The Husky Counterclaim asserted a claim of breach of contract
against us and TEI and asserted a claim for tortious interference
with Husky’s contractual relationship with us and a claim for
conspiracy to tortiously interfere with unspecified Husky business
and contractual relationships against us and TEI, John Brda and
Willard McAndrew III. Gastar Exploration, Inc. also filed a
counterclaim for our alleged breach of a release that Gastar
Exploration, Inc. claimed occurred because we filed this lawsuit
against the Gastar Defendants.
In May
2017, the Court granted Gastar Exploration, Inc., J. Russell
Porter, Michael A. Gerlich, and Jerry R. Schuyler’s, or
Gastar Defendants, motion for summary judgment dismissing all of
our claims against the Gastar Defendants with prejudice. After that
ruling by the Court, the only claim remaining related to the Gastar
Defendants was Gastar’s counterclaim against the
Company. In January 2018, the Court heard cross-motions for
summary judgment by Gastar and us to resolve Gastar’s
remaining claims against us. The Court issued its ruling in March
2018 denying our motion for summary judgment and granting in part
Gastar’s motion for summary judgment. Thereafter on May
23, 2018, a Settlement Agreement and Release was entered into
requiring the Company to pay $470,000 to Gastar, which amount was
paid on that date. The Court signed an agreed order of
nonsuit with prejudice related to Gastar's claims on May 24,
2018.
In
April 2018, we and TEI entered into a binding letter agreement with
Husky and its affiliates that settled for non-financial
consideration all claims asserted by Husky, including those claims
Husky asserted against John Brda and Willard McAndrew III, as well
as the claims we and TEI asserted against Husky and its affiliates.
The binding letter agreement required a formal settlement agreement
that was executed on June 27, 2018 resulting in all claims asserted
against the Company, TEI, John Brda, Willard McAndrew III, Husky
and Husky’s affiliates being dismissed with
prejudice.
As of
June 29, 2018, all remaining claims, not previously dismissed,
against all parties were dismissed with prejudice when the court
signed an agreed nonsuit with prejudice pursuant to a settlement
agreement between the parties and the legal proceeding is over and
closed.
TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
7. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
On
April 19, 2018, we entered into an Underwriting Agreement with Roth
Capital Partners, LLC (the “Underwriter”) under which a
total of 5,750,000 shares of our common stock were issued and sold
in an underwritten public offering, which amount includes the full
exercise of the over-allotment option for 750,000 shares. The
offering closed on April 23, 2018. The public offering price for
each share of common stock was $1.15. The Underwriter purchased the
shares of common stock from us at a price of $1.0752 per share,
representing a 6.5% discount from the public offering price. The
Underwriter acted as the sole manager for the offering. The common
stock was offered and sold pursuant to our effective registration
statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333220181) filed with the SEC on
August 25, 2017 and declared effective by the SEC on September 28,
2017, the accompanying prospectus contained therein, and
preliminary and final prospectus supplements filed with the SEC in
connection with our takedown relating to the offering. The net
proceeds to us from the sale of the shares of common stock in the
offering was $6,049,734, after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and our other offering expenses.
During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company issued
400,000 shares of common stock as compensation for consulting
services, with total fair value of $486,000.
During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company issued
172,342 shares of common stock in satisfaction of the payment in
kind due on April 10, 2018 to the holders of notes payable by the
Company, with total fair value of $221,025.
During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company issued
620,000 warrants for consulting services which resulted in $404,145
of recognized expense.
During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company recognized
$110,000 stock based compensation of expense related to 800,000
stock options issued in third quarter of 2017.
During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company issued
400,000 shares of common stock for exercise of warrants, with total
fair value of $200,000.
A summary of warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2018 by exercise
price and year of expiration is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
0.70
|
-
|
-
|
420,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
420,000
|
$
0.77
|
-
|
100,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
100,000
|
$
1.00
|
-
|
25,116
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
25,116
|
$
1.03
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
120,000
|
-
|
-
|
120,000
|
$
1.08
|
-
|
37,500
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
37,500
|
$
1.21
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
120,000
|
120,000
|
$
1.40
|
-
|
-
|
1,121,736
|
|
-
|
-
|
1,121,736
|
$
1.50
|
-
|
-
|
|
100,000
|
-
|
-
|
100,000
|
$
1.64
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
200,000
|
-
|
-
|
200,000
|
$
1.73
|
100,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
100,000
|
$
1.80
|
-
|
-
|
1,250,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,250,000
|
$
2.00
|
837,596
|
-
|
-
|
400,000
|
-
|
-
|
1,237,596
|
$
2.03
|
2,000,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,000,000
|
$
2.09
|
1,800,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,800,000
|
$
2.23
|
-
|
-
|
832,512
|
|
-
|
-
|
832,512
|
$
2.29
|
80,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
80,000
|
$
2.50
|
-
|
35,211
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
35,211
|
$
2.82
|
38,174
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
38,174
|
$
3.50
|
-
|
15,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
15,000
|
$
4.50
|
-
|
700,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
700,000
|
$
6.00
|
60,000
|
22,580
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
82,580
|
$
7.00
|
-
|
700,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
700,000
|
|
4,915,770
|
1,635,407
|
3,624,248
|
820,000
|
-
|
120,000
|
11,115,425
|
TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
7. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (CONTINUED)
A summary of stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2018 by
exercise price and year of expiration is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
0.97
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
259,742
|
-
|
259,742
|
$
1.10
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
800,000
|
800,000
|
$
1.57
|
-
|
-
|
1,497,163
|
4,500,000
|
-
|
-
|
5,997,163
|
$
1.63
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
58,026
|
58,026
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
300,000
|
-
|
-
|
300,000
|
|
-
|
-
|
1,497,163
|
4,800,000
|
259,742
|
858,026
|
7,414,931
|
At June 30, 2018, the Company had reserved 418,530,356 shares for
future exercise of warrants and options.
Warrants and options issued were valued using the Black Scholes
Option Pricing Model. The assumptions used in calculating the fair
value of the warrants and options issued during the six months
ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
2018
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
2.15% - 2.82%
|
Expected volatility of common stock
|
106% - 119%
|
Dividend yield
|
0.00%
|
Discount due to lack of marketability
|
20%
|
Expected life of option/warrant
|
Three to Five Years
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.47% - 1.94%
|
Expected volatility of common stock
|
106.5% - 116.5%
|
Dividend yield
|
0.00%
|
Discount due to lack of marketability
|
20%
|
Expected life of option/warrant
|
Four to Five Years
|
8. INCOME TAXES
On
December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted tax legislation referred to as
the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Tax Act) which significantly changes
U.S. corporate income tax laws beginning, generally, in 2018. These
changes include, among others, (i) a permanent reduction of the
U.S. corporate income tax rate from a top marginal rate of 35% to a
flat rate of 21%, (ii) elimination of the corporate alternative
minimum tax, (iii) immediate deductions for certain new investments
instead of deductions for depreciation expense over time, (iv)
limitation on the tax deduction for interest expense to 30% of
adjusted taxable income, (v) limitation of the deduction for net
operating losses to 80% of current year taxable income and
elimination of net operating loss carrybacks, and (vi) elimination
of many business deductions and credits, including the domestic
production activities deduction, the deduction for entertainment
expenditures, and the deduction for certain executive compensation
in excess of $1 million. Additional impacts from the enactment of
the Tax Act will be recorded as they are identified during the
measurement period as provided for in SAB No. 118, which extends up
to one year from the enactment date.
The
Company estimates its annual effective income tax rate in recording
its quarterly provision for income taxes in the various
jurisdictions in which it operates. Statutory tax rate changes and
other significant or unusual items are recognized as discrete items
in the quarter in which they occur. The Company recorded no income
tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2018 because the
Company expects to incur a tax loss in the current year. Similarly,
no income tax expense was recognized for the six months ended June
30, 2017 for this same reason.
TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
8. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
The Company had a net deferred tax asset related to federal net
operating loss carryforwards of $55,019,751 and $52,934,915 at June
30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The federal net
operating loss carryforward will begin to expire in 2030.
Realization of the deferred tax asset is dependent, in part, on
generating sufficient taxable income prior to expiration of the
loss
carryforwards. The Company has placed a 100% valuation
allowance against the net deferred tax asset because future
realization of these assets is not assured.
9. PROMISSORY NOTES
On
April 10, 2017, we sold to investors in a private transaction two
12% unsecured promissory notes with a total of $8,000,000 in
principal amount. Interest only is due and payable on the notes
each month at the rate of 12% per annum, with a balloon payment of
the outstanding principal due and payable at maturity on April 10,
2020. The holders of the notes will also receive annual payments of
common stock at the rate of 2.5% of principal amount outstanding,
based on a volume-weighted average price. Both notes were sold at
an original issue discount of 94.25% and accordingly, we received
total proceeds of $7,540,000 from the investors. We used the
proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes, which
includes, without limitation, drilling capital, lease acquisition
capital and repayment of prior debt.
These
12% promissory notes allow for early redemption. The notes also
contain certain covenants under which we have agreed that, except
for financing arrangements with established commercial banking or
financial institutions and other debts and liabilities incurred in
the normal course of business, we will not issue any other notes or
debt offerings which have a maturity date prior to the payment in
full of the 12% notes, unless consented to by the
holders.
The
effective interest rate is 16.15%.
On
April 24, 2017, we used $2,509,500 of the proceeds from this
financing to redeem and repay a portion of the outstanding 12%
Series B Convertible Unsecured Promissory Notes. Separately,
$1,000,000 of the principal amount of the Series B Notes plus
accrued interest was converted into 1,007,890 shares of common
stock and $60,000 was rolled into the new debt
financing.
On
February 6, 2018, we sold to an investor in a private transaction a
12% unsecured promissory note with a principal amount of
$4,500,000. Interest only is due and payable on the note each month
at the rate of 12% per annum, with a balloon payment of the
outstanding principal due and payable at maturity on April 10,
2020. The holder of the note will also receive annual payments of
common stock at the rate of 2.5% of principal amount outstanding,
based on a volume-weighted average price. We sold the note at an
original issue discount of 96.27% and accordingly, we received
total proceeds of $4,332,150 from the investor. We used the
proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes, which
includes, without limitation, drilling capital, lease acquisition
capital and repayment of prior debt.
This
12% promissory note allows for early redemption, provided that if
we redeem before February 6, 2019, we must pay the holder all
unpaid interest and common stock payments on the portion of the
note redeemed that would have been earned through February 6, 2019.
The note also contains certain covenants under which we have agreed
that, except for financing arrangements with established commercial
banking or financial institutions and other debts and liabilities
incurred in the normal course of business, we will not issue any
other notes or debt offerings which have a maturity date prior to
the payment in full of the 12% note, unless consented to by the
holder.
The
effective interest rate is 15.88%.
On
April 12, 2018, the holders of the notes described above received
172,342 shares of common stock as a payment in kind representing
the annual payments of common stock due at the rate of 2.5% of
principal amount outstanding as of April 10, 2018 based on a
volume-weighted average price calculation.
Promissory
note transactions for the six months ended June 30, 2018 are
summarized as follows:
Unsecured
promissory note balance - December 31, 2017
|
$
7,269,281
|
|
|
New
borrowing
|
4,500,000
|
Original
issue discount
|
(167,850
)
|
Proceeds
from borrowing
|
4,332,150
|
|
|
New
note debt issuance costs
|
(225,000
)
|
Accretion
of discount and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
227,774
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured
promissory note balance - June 30, 2018
|
$
11,604,205
|
TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
9. PROMISSORY NOTES (CONTINUED)
In connection with the transaction for the acquisition of Warwink
Properties effective December 5, 2017, the Company borrowed $3.25
million from its Chairman, Greg McCabe on a three-year interest
only promissory note bearing interest at 5% per annum. The Company
paid $250,000 as a principal payment on June 20,
2018.
10. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The following is a reconciliation of the asset retirement
obligations liability for the six months ended June 30,
2018:
Asset
retirement obligation – December 31, 2017
|
$
9,274
|
|
|
Accretion
expense
|
187
|
|
|
Asset
retirement obligation – June 30, 2018
|
$
9,461
|
11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July
25, 2018, we and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Hudspeth Oil
Corporation, entered into a Settlement & Purchase Agreement
(the “Settlement Agreement”) with Founders Oil &
Gas, LLC, Founders Oil & Gas Operating, LLC, Wolfbone
Investments, LLC (a wholly-owned company of Gregory McCabe, our
Chairman) and McCabe Petroleum Corporation (also a wholly-owned
company of Mr. McCabe), which agreement provides for Hudspeth Oil
and Wolfbone Investments to each immediately pay $625,000 and for
Hudspeth Oil or the Company and Wolfbone Investments or McCabe
Petroleum to each pay another $625,000 on July 20, 2019, as
consideration for Founders Oil & Gas assigning all of its
working interest in the oil and gas leases of the Orogrande Project
to Hudspeth Oil and Wolfbone Investments equally. The assignments
to Hudspeth Oil and Wolfbone Investments were made in July when the
first payments were made. The payments to Founders Oil & Gas
due in 2019 are not securitized. After this assignment (for which
Hudspeth Oil’s total consideration is $1,250,000), Hudspeth
Oil’s working interest will increase to 72.5%. Additionally,
the Settlement Agreement provides that the Founders parties will
assign to the Company, Hudspeth Oil, Wolfbone Investments and
McCabe Petroleum their claims against certain vendors for damages,
if any, against such vendors for negligent services or defective
equipment. Further, the Settlement Agreement has a mutual release
and waivers among the parties.