History
We were
originally incorporated in September 2000 as Rocker & Spike
Entertainment, Inc. In January 2001 we changed our name to
Reconstruction Data Group, Inc., and in April 2003 we changed our
name to Verdisys, Inc. and were engaged in the business of
providing satellite services to agribusiness. In June 2005, we
changed our name to Blast Energy Services, Inc.
(“Blast”) to
reflect our new focus on the energy services business, and in 2010
we changed the direction of the Company to focus on the acquisition
of oil and gas producing properties.
On July
27, 2012, we acquired, through a reverse acquisition, Pacific
Energy Development Corp., a privately held Nevada corporation,
which we refer to as Pacific Energy Development. As described
below, pursuant to the acquisition, the stockholders of Pacific
Energy Development gained control of approximately 95% of the then
voting securities of our company. Since the transaction resulted in
a change of control, Pacific Energy Development was the acquirer
for accounting purposes. In connection with the merger, which we
refer to as the Pacific Energy Development merger, Pacific Energy
Development became our wholly-owned subsidiary and we changed our
name from Blast Energy Services, Inc. to PEDEVCO Corp. Following
the merger, we refocused our business plan on the acquisition,
exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas
resources in the United States.
Our
corporate headquarters are located in approximately 5,200 square
feet of office space at 575 N. Dairy Ashford, Suite 210, Houston,
Texas 77079. We lease that space pursuant to a lease that expires
in August 2023.
Business Operations
Overview
We are an oil and gas company focused on the
acquisition and development of oil and natural gas assets
where the latest in modern drilling and completion techniques and
technologies have yet to be applied. In particular, we focus on
legacy proven properties where there is a long production history,
well defined geology and existing infrastructure that can be
leveraged when applying modern field management technologies. Our
current properties are located in the San Andres formation of the
Permian Basin situated in West Texas and eastern New Mexico (the
“Permian
Basin”) and in the
Denver-Julesberg Basin (“D-J
Basin”) in
Colorado. As of December
31, 2019, we held approximately 38,258 net Permian Basin acres
located in Chaves and Roosevelt Counties, New Mexico, through our
wholly-owned operating subsidiary, Pacific Energy Development Corp.
(“PEDCO”),
which we refer to as our “Permian Basin
Asset,” and approximately
11,948 net D-J Basin acres located in Weld and Morgan Counties,
Colorado, through our wholly-owned operating subsidiary, Red Hawk
Petroleum, LLC (“Red
Hawk”), which asset we
refer to as our “D-J Basin
Asset.” As of
December 31, 2019, we held interests in 379 gross (302
net) wells in our Permian Basin Asset, of which 51 are active
producers, 25 are active injectors and one well is an active
Saltwater Disposal Well (“SWD”), all of which are held by PEDCO and
operated by its wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, and
interests in 75 gross (21.9
net) wells in our D-J Basin Asset, of which 18 gross (16.2
net) wells are operated by Red Hawk and currently producing,
36 gross (5.6 net) wells are non-operated, and 21 wells have
an after-payout interest.
Business Strategy
We
believe that horizontal development and exploitation of
conventional assets in the Permian Basin and development of the
Wattenberg and Wattenberg Extension in the D-J Basin, represent
among the most economic oil and natural gas plays in the
U.S. We plan to optimize our existing assets and
opportunistically seek additional acreage proximate to our
currently held core acreage, as well as other attractive onshore
U.S. oil and gas assets that fit our acquisition criteria, that
Company management believes can be developed using our technical
and operating expertise and be accretive to stockholder
value.
Specifically, we
seek to increase stockholder value through the following
strategies:
●
Grow production, cash flow and reserves by
developing our operated drilling inventory and participating
opportunistically in non-operated projects. We believe our
extensive inventory of drilling locations in the Permian Basin and
the DJ-Basin, combined with our operating expertise, will enable us
to continue to deliver accretive production, cash flow and reserves
growth. We have identified approximately 150 gross drilling
locations across our Permian Basin acreage based on 20-acre
spacing. We believe the location, concentration and scale of our
core leasehold positions, coupled with our technical understanding
of the reservoirs will allow us to efficiently develop our core
areas and to allocate capital to maximize the value of our resource
base.
●
Apply modern drilling and completion techniques
and technologies. We own and intend to own additional
properties that have been historically underdeveloped and
underexploited. We believe our attention to detail and application
of the latest industry advances in horizontal drilling, completions
design, frac intensity and locally optimal frac fluids will allow
us to successfully develop our properties.
●
Optimization of well density and
configuration. We own properties that are legacy
conventional oil fields characterized by widespread vertical
development and geological well control. We utilize the extensive
petrophysical and production data of such legacy properties to
confirm optimal well spacing and configuration using modern
reservoir evaluation methodologies.
●
Maintain a high degree of operational
control. We believe that by retaining high operational
control, we can efficiently manage the timing and amount of our
capital expenditures and operating costs, and thus key in on the
optimal drilling and completions strategies, which we believe will
generate higher recoveries and greater rates of return per
well.
●
Leverage extensive deal flow, technical and
operational experience to evaluate and execute accretive
acquisition opportunities. Our management and technical
teams have an extensive track record of forming and building oil
and gas businesses. We also have significant expertise in
successfully sourcing, evaluating and executing acquisition
opportunities. We believe our understanding of the geology,
geophysics and reservoir properties of potential acquisition
targets will allow us to identify and acquire highly prospective
acreage in order to grow our reserve base and maximize stockholder
value.
●
Preserve financial flexibility to pursue
organic and external growth opportunities. We intend to
maintain a disciplined financial profile that will provide us
flexibility across various commodity and market cycles. We intend
to utilize our strategic partners and public currency to
continuously fund development and operations.
Our
strategy is to be the operator and/or a significant working
interest owner, directly or through our subsidiaries and joint
ventures, in the majority of our acreage so we can dictate the pace
of development in order to execute our business plan. Our 2020
development plan includes several carryover projects from
2019’s Phase II Permian Basin Asset development plan. These
projects include the drilling of a SWD well in the Chaveroo field
(Chaves and Roosevelt Counties, New Mexico) and production hookup
and commencement on five horizontal San Andres wells drilled in
2019. In the later part of 2020, our plan contemplates the drilling
of two horizontal San Andres wells on our Permian Basin Asset.
Additionally, we plan to test a vertical reactivation program in
the Chaveroo field, offsetting our new horizontal wells, where six
reactivations are currently planned. We also have planned several
vertical reactivations in the Milnesand field (Chaves and Roosevelt
Counties, New Mexico) and several enhancement and facilities
projects throughout all our operated assets. We currently have
approximately $2 million earmarked for D-J Basin Asset projects in
2020, pending receipt of well proposals that meet our participation
criteria. Our total planned capital expenditure budget for 2020 is
approximately $14.5 million, which amount the Company anticipates
that it can fund through cash from operations together with
approximately $12 million of existing cash on the balance sheet as
of the filing date of these financial statements, of which
carryover capital accounts for approximately $5 million, and the
balance will be deployed for new development projects. This plan of
operations is contingent on a minimum of a $50 per barrel realized
oil price (West Texas Intermediate pricing) and could
fluctuate based on market conditions and/or opportunities that may
arise throughout the year. If the oil price continues to remain
below this $50 per barrel threshold, the Company has the ability to
slow or halt most of its projects, and reduce its 2020 capital
expenditures to approximately $5 million, which includes funding
for the completion of a SWD well in the Permian Asset, which was
drilled in early 2020 and is currently being completed. We expect
that we will have sufficient cash available to meet our needs over
the foreseeable future, which cash we anticipate being available
from (i) our projected cash flow from operations,
(ii) our existing cash on hand, (iii) equity infusions or
loans (which may be convertible) made available from SK Energy
LLC, which is 100% owned and controlled by Dr. Simon Kukes, the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and director
(“SK
Energy”), which funding SK Energy is under no
obligation to provide, and (iv) funding through credit or loan
facilities. In addition, we may seek additional funding through
asset sales, farm-out arrangements, lines of credit, or public or
private debt or equity financings to fund 2020 capital expenditures
and/or acquisitions. If market conditions are not conducive to
raising additional funds, the Company may choose to extend the
drilling program and associated capital expenditures further into
2020.
The
following chart reflects our current organizational
structure:
*Represents
percentage of total voting power based on 72,125,328
shares of common stock (solely on an issued and outstanding
basis) outstanding as of March 27, 2020, with beneficial
ownership calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange
Act (but without reflecting the conversion of convertible
securities into voting securities, including, options exercisable
for common stock of the Company. Holdings of SK Energy LLC, an
entity wholly-owned and controlled by our CEO and director Dr.
Simon Kukes, are also included in holdings of Senior Management and
Board – See “Part III” —
“Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters.” Ownership of Mr.
Tkachev is based solely on his filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Competition
The oil
and natural gas industry is highly competitive. We compete, and
will continue to compete, with major and independent oil and
natural gas companies for exploration and exploitation
opportunities, acreage and property acquisitions. We also compete
for drilling rig contracts and other equipment and labor required
to drill, operate and develop our properties. Many of our
competitors have substantially greater financial resources, staffs,
facilities and other resources than we have. In addition, larger
competitors may be able to absorb the burden of any changes in
federal, state and local laws and regulations more easily than we
can, which would adversely affect our competitive position. These
competitors may be able to pay more for drilling rigs or
exploratory prospects and productive oil and natural gas properties
and may be able to define, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater
number of properties and prospects than we can. Our competitors may
also be able to afford to purchase and operate their own drilling
rigs.
Our
ability to exploit, drill and explore for oil and natural gas and
to acquire properties will depend upon our ability to conduct
operations, to evaluate and select suitable properties and to
consummate transactions in this highly competitive environment.
Many of our competitors have a longer history of operations than we
have, and many of them have also demonstrated the ability to
operate through industry cycles.
Competitive Strengths
We
believe we are well positioned to successfully execute our business
strategies and achieve our business objectives because of the
following competitive strengths:
Legacy Conventional Focus.
Legacy conventional oil fields that have seen large-scale vertical
development. Vertical production confirms moveable hydrocarbons
ideal for horizontal development that may have been technologically
or economically limited or missed.
Technical Engineering & Operations
Expertise. Lateral landing decisions incorporate log
analysis, fracture-geometry modeling and an understanding of local
porosity and saturation distributions. Our team are creative
problem solvers with expertise in wellbore mechanics, completion
design, production enhancement, artificial lift design, water
handling, facilities optimization, and production down-time
reduction.
Low Cost Development. Shallow
conventional reservoirs (<8,000 feet) and short to
mid-range laterals (1.0 mile and 1.5 mile, respectively) allow
for efficient full-scale development without the requirement for
extended reach laterals and large fracs to meet economic
thresholds.
Management. We have assembled a
management team at our Company with extensive experience in the
fields of business development, petroleum engineering, geology,
field development and production, operations, planning and
corporate finance. Our management team is headed by our Chief
Executive Officer, Dr. Simon Kukes, who was formerly the CEO at
Samara-Nafta, a Russian oil company partnering with Hess
Corporation, President and CEO of Tyumen Oil Company, and Chairman
of Yukos Oil. Our President, J. Douglas Schick, has over 20 years
of experience in the oil and gas industry, having co-founded
American Resources, Inc., and formerly serving in executive,
management and operational planning, strategy and finance roles at
Highland Oil and Gas, Mariner Energy, Inc., The Houston Exploration
Co., ConocoPhillips and Shell Oil Company. In addition, our
Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Clark R. Moore, has
over 14 years of energy industry experience, and formerly served as
acting general counsel of Erin Energy Corp. Several other members
of the management team have also successfully helped develop
similar companies with like kind asset profiles and technical
operations at Sheridan Production Company, Trinity Operating LLC,
Baker Hughes and Halliburton. We believe that our management team
is highly qualified to identify, acquire and exploit energy
resources in the U.S.
Our
operations team has extensive experience in horizontal development
of conventional assets in the Permian Basin at Sheridan Production
Company and experience drilling and completing unconventional wells
in the D-J Basin at Baker Hughes and Halliburton.
Our
board of directors also brings extensive oil and gas industry
experience, headed by our Chairman, John J. Scelfo, who brings 40
years of experience in oil and gas management, finance and
accounting, and who served in numerous executive-level capacities
at Hess Corporation, including as Senior Vice President, Finance
and Corporate Development, Chief Financial Officer, Worldwide
Exploration & Producing, and as a member of Hess’
Executive Committee. In addition, our Board includes Ivar Siem, who
brings over 50 years of broad experience from both the upstream and
the service segments of the oil and gas industry, including serving
as Chairman of Blue Dolphin Energy Company (OTCQX: BDCO), as
Chairman and interim CEO of DI Industries/Grey Wolf Drilling, as
Chairman and CEO of Seateam Technology ASA, and in various
executive roles at multiple E&P and oil field service
companies. Furthermore, our Board includes H. Douglas Evans, who
brings over 50
years of experience in executive management positions with Gulf
Interstate Engineering Company, one of the world's top pipeline
design and engineering firms, including as its Honorary Chairman
and previously its Chairman and President and Chief Executive
Officer, and who is a past President and current Board member of
the International Pipe Line and Offshore Contractors Association,
current Chairman of its Strategy Committee, and an active member of
the Pipeline Contractors Association.
Significant acreage positions and
drilling potential. As of December 31, 2019, we have
accumulated interests in a total of 38,258 net acres in our core
Permian Basin Asset operating area, and 11,948 net acres in our
core D-J Basin Asset operating area, both of which we believe
represent significant upside potential. The majority of our
interests are in or near areas of considerable activity by both
major and independent operators, although such activity may not be
indicative of our future operations. Based on our current acreage
position, we believe our Permian Basin Asset could contain 185
potential net wells, comprised of 170 net 1.0-mile lateral wells
and 15 net 1.5-mile lateral wells ,on 120-acre spacing and 180-acre
spacing, respectively. We believe our D-J Basin Asset could contain
approximately 90 potential net wells, comprised of 49 net 1.0-mile
lateral wells, 40 net 2.0-mile lateral wells, and 1 net 1.5-mile
lateral well, on 80-acre spacing, 160-acre spacing, and 120-acre
spacing, respectively, providing us with a substantial drilling
inventory for future years.
Marketing
We
generally sell a significant portion of our oil and gas production
to a relatively small number of customers, and during the year
ended December 31, 2019, sales to two customers comprised
54% and 13%, respectively, of the Company’s total oil
and gas revenues. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of
our revenue during these periods. The Company is not dependent upon
any one purchaser and believes that, if its primary customers are
unable or unwilling to continue to purchase the Company’s
production, there are a substantial number of alternative buyers
for its production at comparable prices.
Oil. Our
crude oil is generally sold under short-term, extendable and
cancellable agreements with unaffiliated purchasers. Crude oil
prices realized from production sales are indexed to published
posted refinery prices, and to published crude indexes with
adjustments on a contract basis. Transportation costs related to
moving crude oil are also deducted from the price received for
crude oil.
Natural
Gas. Our
natural gas is sold under both long-term and short-term natural gas
purchase agreements, which include two gas purchase agreements for
our DJ Basin Asset that are in effect until December 1, 2021 and
April 1, 2032, respectively. However, natural gas sales related to
these agreements only represent a nominal (3%) of our total
revenues as of December 31, 2019, and the Company believes that
this trend will continue in the DJ Basin Asset. Natural gas
produced by us is sold at various delivery points at or near
producing wells to both unaffiliated independent marketing
companies and unaffiliated mid-stream companies. We receive
proceeds from prices that are based on various pipeline indices
less any associated fees for processing, location or transportation
differentials.
Oil and Gas Properties
We
believe that our Permian Basin and D-J Basin assets represent among
the most economic oil and natural gas plays in the U.S. We plan to
opportunistically seek additional acreage proximate to our
currently held core acreage located in the Northwest Shelf of the
Permian Basin in Chaves and Roosevelt Counties, New Mexico, and the
Wattenberg and Wattenberg Extension areas of Weld County, Colorado
in the D-J Basin. Our strategy is to be the operator and/or a
significant working interest owner, directly or through our
subsidiaries and joint ventures, in the majority of our acreage so
we can dictate the pace of development in order to execute our
business plan. The majority of our capital expenditure budget
for 2020 will be focused on the development of our Permian Basin
Asset, and secondarily on development of our D-J Basin
Asset.
Unless otherwise noted,
the following table presents summary data for our leasehold acreage
in our core Permian Basin Asset and D-J Basin Asset as of December
31, 2019 and our drilling capital budget with respect to this
acreage from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. If commodity
prices drop significantly, we may delay drilling activities. The
ultimate amount of capital we will expend may fluctuate materially
based on, among other things, market conditions, commodity prices,
asset monetizations, non-operated project proposals, the success of
our drilling results as the year progresses, and availability of
capital (see “Part I” –
“Item 1A. Risk Factors”.)
|
|
Drilling Capital
Budget
January 1, 2020
- December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Cost to
the Company (2)
|
Permian Basin
Asset
|
38,258
|
2.0
|
$3,000,000
|
$6,000,000
|
D-J Basin
Asset
|
11,948
|
3.0
|
6,500,000
|
1,657,500
|
Enhancements
(3)
|
|
|
|
1,018,941
|
Facilities and
Infrastructure (4)
|
|
|
|
980,000
|
2019 Carryover
(5)
|
|
|
|
4,850,000
|
Total
|
50,206
|
5.0
|
|
$14,506,441
|
(1)
|
Includes planned drilling and completion of (i) two 1.0 mile
lateral wells in the Chaveroo Field in the Permian Basin Asset, and
(ii) three gross horizontal wells in the D-J Basin Asset at
8.5% working interest.
|
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
|
The Company anticipates that it
can fund the entire $14.5 million capital cost to the Company
through cash from operations and existing cash on the balance
sheet.
Estimated
capital expenditures for reactivation of existing wells and reserve
enhancing projects on existing wells.
Estimated
capital expenditures for construction of central facilities
including tank batteries, injection lines, heater treaters, and
other property equipment in the Permian Basin Asset.
Carryover
capital expenditures from the 2019 development plan. Includes a SWD
well and cleanouts, hookups, flowback and associated costs on five
(2019 Phase II) wells.
|
Our Core Areas
Permian Basin Asset
We
hold our Permian Basin Assets through our wholly-owned subsidiary,
PEDCO, with operations conducted through PEDCO’s wholly-owned
operating subsidiaries, EOR Operating Company and Ridgeway Arizona
Oil Corp. Our Permian Basin Asset was assembled through three
acquisitions completed between 2018 and 2019. In the first
acquisition, we acquired 100% of the assets of Hunter Oil Company,
with an effective date of September 1, 2018, which created our core
Permian position. In 2019, we acquired additional assets in two
bolt-on acquisitions from private operators. These interests are
all located in Chaves and Roosevelt Counties, New Mexico, where we
currently operate 379 gross (302 net) wells, of which 51 wells
are active producers, 25 wells are active injectors, and one well
is an active SWD. As of December 31, 2019, our Permian Basin Asset
acreage is located in the areas shaded in yellow in the sectional
map following the State of New Mexico map below.
It is
estimated that there are approximately 110 billion barrels of
oil-in-place in San Andres reservoirs across the Permian Basin
(Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America
(“RPSEA”) report dated
December 21, 2015). The San Andres oilfields of the Northwest
Shelf, Central Basin Platform and the Eastern Shelf are some of the
largest oilfields within the Permian Basin. According to the U.S.
Energy Information Administration (“EIA”), as of December 31,
2013, three oil fields that have produced from the San Andres
formation were amongst the top 50 largest oilfields by reserves in
the United States. The San Andres has been historically
under-developed due to technological and economic limitations
during early development. The San Andres is a dolomitic carbonate
reservoir characterized as being highly-heterogenous with a
multi-porosity system that typically shows significant oil
saturation, but primary production often yields higher than normal
water cut. While existing San Andres operators may ascribe
different drivers for the water cut, San Andres production requires
sufficient fluid removal, transportation and disposal, in order to
achieve higher oil cuts, through a network of on-site fluid storage
and saltwater disposal systems.
Oil was
originally trapped in the San Andres by three types of pre-Tertiary
traps: Structural, Stratigraphic and Structurally enhanced
Stratigraphic. Legacy fields exist where oil accumulated in these
traps to form thick oil columns, referred to as Main Pay Zones
(“MPZ”). Legacy San Andres
fields lack sharp oil-water contacts creating secondary zones of
increasing water saturation beneath the MPZ known as Transitional
Oil Zones (“TOZ”) and Residual
Oil Zones (“ROZ”). TOZs and ROZs also
extend outside the historical boundaries of the legacy fields
downdip to their structural limits. The vast majority of horizontal
San Andres wells have been drilled in these TOZ and ROZ areas where
vertical development is uneconomic.
The
Company’s 38,258 net acres within the Chaveroo and Milnesand
fields of Chaves and Roosevelt Counties, New Mexico offer a rare
opportunity to drill infill horizontal wells targeting the higher
oil-saturations of the MPZs. The Chaveroo NE field is an extension
of the Chaveroo field that was not originally developed vertically.
There are currently 379 wellbores within the leasehold, of which 51
are active producers and 25 are active injectors, and one is an
active SWD. The remainder are shut-in wellbores with future
potential utility for additional water injection, production
reactivations, and behind-pipe recompletions. We currently own and
operate three water handling facilities, one in each field, that
have a current combined capacity of approximately 40,000 barrels of
water per day (bbl/d).
D-J Basin Asset
We have
grown our legacy D-J Basin Asset position to 11,948 net acres in
Weld and Morgan Counties, Colorado. We
directly hold all of our interests in the D-J Basin Asset through
our wholly-owned subsidiary, Red Hawk. These interests are all
located in Weld County, Colorado. Red Hawk has an interest in 75
gross (21.9 net) wells and is currently the operator of 18
gross (16.2 net) wells located in our D-J Basin Asset. Our D-J
Basin Asset acreage is located in the areas circled in the map
below. The D-J Basin has seen a tremendous amount of growth
in drilling activity in the past 12 months. D-J Basin operators are
now drilling 16 to 24 horizontal wells per section in the Niobrara
and Codell formations, utilizing the latest advances in completion
design, frac stages, and frac intensity to obtain favorable well
results. Notable non-operated partners leading the Niobrara revival
are Noble Energy, Extraction Oil & Gas, SRC Energy (merged with
PDC Energy in January 2020), and Bonanza Creek Energy.
Production, Sales Price and Production Costs
We have
listed below the total production volumes and total
revenue net to the Company for the years ended December 31,
2019, 2018, and 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Revenues
|
$12,972,000
|
$4,523,000
|
$3,015,000
|
|
|
|
|
Oil:
|
|
|
|
Total Production
(Bbls)
|
234,378
|
70,395
|
52,260
|
Average sales price
(per Bbl)
|
$53.41
|
$59.00
|
$47.15
|
Natural
Gas:
|
|
|
|
Total Production
(Mcf)
|
153,251
|
89,769
|
100,254
|
Average sales price
(per Mcf)
|
$2.43
|
$2.56
|
$2.97
|
NGL:
|
|
|
|
Total Production
(Bbls)
|
6,150
|
7,629
|
12,209
|
Average sales price
(per Bbl)
|
$13.28
|
$18.32
|
$20.73
|
Oil
Equivalents:
|
|
|
|
Total Production
(Boe) (1)
|
266,070
|
92,985
|
81,178
|
Average Daily
Production (Boe/d)
|
729
|
255
|
222
|
Average Production Costs (per
Boe) (2)
|
$15.32
|
$19.77
|
$13.62
|
_________________________
(1)
|
Assumes
6 Mcf of natural gas equivalents to 1 barrel of oil.
|
(2)
|
Excludes
workover costs, marketing, ad valorem and severance
taxes.
|
As of
December 31, 2019, and 2018, the Chaveroo and Milnesand fields are
the fields that each comprise 15% or more of our total proved
reserves. As of December 31, 2017, the Wattenberg field comprised
15% or more of our total proved reserves for that year. The
applicable production volumes from these fields for the years ended
December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, is represented in the table
below in total barrels (Bbls):
|
|
|
|
Chaveroo
|
120,765
|
3,631
|
-
|
Milnesand
|
11,295
|
2,917
|
-
|
Wattenberg
|
-
|
-
|
46,198
|
*
In 2018, production from our
acquisition of the Chaveroo and Milnesand fields in the third
quarter 2018 are the fields that each comprised 15% or more of our
total proved reserves at December 31, 2018. The data above only
includes production for these fields since the date of the
acquisition.
The
following table summarizes our gross and net developed and
undeveloped leasehold and mineral fee acreage at December 31,
2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D-J
Basin
|
205,994
|
11,948
|
183,370
|
9,388
|
22,624
|
2,560
|
Permian
Basin
|
40,648
|
38,258
|
31,813
|
31,036
|
8,835
|
7,222
|
Total
|
246,642
|
50,206
|
215,183
|
40,424
|
31,459
|
9,782
|
(1) Developed
acreage is the number of acres that are allocated or assignable to
producing wells or wells capable of production.
(2) Undeveloped
acreage is lease acreage on which wells have not been drilled or
completed to a point that would permit the production of commercial
quantities of oil and natural gas regardless of whether such
acreage includes proved reserves.
We
believe we have satisfactory title, in all material respects, to
substantially all of our producing properties in accordance with
standards generally accepted in the oil and natural gas
industry.
Total Net Undeveloped Acreage Expiration
In
the event that production is not established or we take no action
to extend or renew the terms of our leases, our net undeveloped
acreage that will expire over the next three years as of
December 31, 2019 is 1,758, 3,545 and 1,395 for the years
ending December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. We
expect to retain substantially all of our expiring acreage either
through drilling activities, renewal of the expiring leases or
through the exercise of extension options.
Well Summary
The
following table presents our ownership in productive crude oil and
natural gas wells at December 31, 2019. This summary includes crude
oil wells in which we have a working interest:
|
|
|
Crude
oil
|
122.0
|
88.1
|
Natural
gas
|
-
|
-
|
Total*
|
122.0
|
88.1
|
*
Total percentage
of gross operated wells is 69.7%.
Drilling Activity
We
drilled wells or participated in the drilling of wells as indicated
in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive
|
20
|
9.6
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
0.2
|
Dry
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exploratory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Dry
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Oil and Natural Gas Reserves
Reserve Information.
For estimates of the Company’s
net proved producing reserves of crude oil and natural gas, as well
as discussion of the Company’s proved and probable
undeveloped reserves, see “Part II” -
“Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”
– “Supplemental Oil and Gas Disclosures
(Unaudited)”. At December 31, 2019, the
Company’s total estimated proved reserves were 14.0 million
Boe, of which 12.4 million Bbls were crude oil and NGL reserves,
and 9.7 million Mcf were natural gas reserves.
Internal Controls.
Clayton Riddle, our Vice
President of Development (a non-executive position), is the
technical person primarily responsible for our internal reserves
estimation process (which are based upon the best available
production, engineering and geologic data) and provides
oversight of the annual audit of our year end reserves by our
independent third party engineers. He has a Bachelor of Science
degree in Petroleum Engineering, and in excess of five years as a
reserves estimator and is a member of the Society of Petroleum
Engineers.
The
preparation of our reserve estimates is in accordance with our
prescribed procedures that include verification of input data into
a reserve forecasting and economic software, as well as management
review. Our reserve analysis includes, but is not limited to, the
following:
●
Research of
operators near our lease acreage. Review operating and
technological techniques, as well as reserve projections of such
wells.
●
The review of
internal reserve estimates by well and by area by a qualified
petroleum engineer. A variance by well to the previous year-end
reserve report is used as a tool in this process.
●
SEC-compliant
internal policies to determine and report proved
reserves.
●
The discussion of
any material reserve variances among management to ensure the best
estimate of remaining reserves.
Qualifications of Third Party
Engineers. The technical person
primarily responsible for the audit of our reserves estimates
at Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. is W. Todd Brooker, who meets the requirements
regarding qualifications, independence, objectivity, and
confidentiality set forth in the Standards Pertaining to the
Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information
promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers. Cawley,
Gillespie & Associates, Inc. is an independent firm and does
not own an interest in our properties and is not employed on a
contingent fee basis. Reserve estimates are imprecise and
subjective and may change at any time as additional information
becomes available. Furthermore, estimates of oil and gas reserves
are projections based on engineering data. There are uncertainties
inherent in the interpretation of this data as well as the
projection of future rates of production. The accuracy of any
reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and
of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. A copy
of the report issued by Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. is
incorporated by reference into this report as Exhibit
99.1.
For
more information regarding our oil and gas reserves, please refer
to "Part II"
–
“Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”
– “Supplemental Oil and Gas Disclosures
(Unaudited)”.
January 2019 SK Energy
Convertible Note
On January 11, 2019, the Company borrowed $15.0
million from SK Energy, through the issuance of a convertible
promissory note in the amount of $15.0 million (the
“January 2019
Convertible Note”). The
January 2019 Convertible Note accrues interest monthly at 8.5% per
annum, which is payable on the maturity date, unless otherwise
converted into shares of the Company’s common stock as
described below. The January 2019 Convertible Note and all accrued
interest thereon are convertible into shares of the Company’s
common stock, at the option of the holder thereof, at a conversion
price equal to $1.50 per share. Further, the conversion of the
January 2019 Convertible Note is subject to a 49.9% conversion
limitation which prevents the conversion of any portion thereof
into common stock of the Company if such conversion would result in
SK Energy or any of its affiliates beneficially owning more than
49.9% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock.
The January 2019, Convertible Note is due and payable on January
11, 2022 but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. In
February 2019, the January 2019 Convertible Note was converted into
common stock as discussed below.
Convertible Notes
Amendment and Conversion
On
February 15, 2019, the Company and SK Energy agreed to amend the
terms of $23.6 million in Convertible Promissory Notes sold in
August 2018 (including $22 million acquired by SK Energy) and
a $7 million Convertible Note sold to SK Energy in October 2018,
each described in further detail in “Part II” - “Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” –
“Note 8 - Notes Payable”, as well as the January 2019
Convertible Note, whereby each of the notes were amended to remove
the conversion limitation that previously prevented SK Energy from
converting any portion of the notes into common stock of the
Company if such conversion would have resulted in SK Energy
beneficially owning more than 49.9% of the Company’s
outstanding shares of common stock
Immediately
following the entry into the Amendment, on February 15, 2019, SK
Energy elected to convert (i) all $15,000,000 of the
outstanding principal and all $126,000 of accrued interest under
the January 2019 defined above as the “January 2019
Convertible Notes” into common stock of the Company at a
conversion price of $1.50 per share as set forth in the January
2019 defined above as the “January 2019 Convertible
Notes” into 10,083,819 shares of restricted common stock of
the Company, and (ii) all $7,000,000 of the outstanding
principal and all $18,700of accrued interest under the October 2018
note into common stock of the Company at a conversion price of
$1.79 per share as set forth in the October 2018 note into
4,014,959 shares of restricted common stock of the Company, which
shares in aggregate represented approximately 47.1% of the
Company’s then 29,907,223 shares of issued and outstanding
Company common stock after giving effect to the
conversions.
SK Energy Note
Amendment; Note Purchases and Conversion
On March 1, 2019, the Company and SK Energy
entered into a First Amendment to Promissory Note (the
“SK Energy Note
Amendment”) which
amended the note dated June 25, 2018, evidencing $7.7 million of
principal owed to SK Energy (the “SK Energy
Note”), to provide SK
Energy the right, at any time, at its option, to convert the
principal and interest owed under such SK Energy Note, into shares
of the Company’s common stock, at a conversion price of $2.13
per share. The SK Energy Note previously only included a conversion
feature whereby the Company had the option to pay quarterly
interest payments on the SK Energy Note in shares of Company common
stock instead of cash, at a conversion price per share calculated
based on the average closing sales price of the Company’s
common stock on the NYSE American for the ten trading days
immediately preceding the last day of the calendar quarter
immediately prior to the quarterly payment
date.
In addition, on March 1, 2019, the holders of
$1,500,000 in aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes
issued by the Company on August 1, 2018 (the
“August 2018
Notes”) sold their
August 2018 Notes at face value plus accrued and unpaid interest
through March 1, 2019 to SK Energy (the “August 2018 Note
Sale”). Holders which
sold their August 2018 Notes pursuant to the August 2018 Note Sale
to SK Energy include an executive officer of SK Energy ($200,000 in
principal amount of August 2018 Notes); a trust affiliated with
John J. Scelfo, a director of the Company ($500,000 in principal
amount of August 2018 Notes); an entity affiliated with Ivar Siem,
a director of the Company, and J. Douglas Schick the President of
the Company ($500,000 in principal amount of August 2018 Notes);
and Harold Douglas Evans, a director of the Company ($200,000 in
principal amount of August 2018 Notes).
Following the August 2018 Note Sale, the
Company’s sole issued and outstanding debt was the
(i) $7,700,000 in principal, plus accrued interest, under the
SK Energy Note held by SK Energy, (ii) an aggregate of
$23,500,000 in principal, plus accrued interest, under the August
2018 Notes and Convertible Note held by SK Energy, and
(iii) $100,000 in principal, plus accrued interest, under an
August 2018 Note held by an unaffiliated holder (the
“Unaffiliated
Holder”).
Immediately following the effectiveness of the SK
Energy Note Amendment and August 2018 Note Sale, on March 1, 2019,
SK Energy and the Unaffiliated Holder elected to convert all
$31,300,000 of outstanding principal and an aggregate of $1,462,818
of accrued interest under the SK Energy Note, Convertible Note held
by SK Energy, and August 2018 Notes, into common stock of the
Company at a conversion price of $2.13 per share (the
“Conversion
Price” and the
“Conversions”) as
set forth in the SK Energy Note, as amended, and the August 2018
Notes and the Convertible Note held by SK Energy (collectively, the
“Notes”),
into an aggregate of 15,381,605 shares of restricted common stock
of the Company (the “Conversion
Shares”).
As
a result of the Conversions and the issuance of the shares of
common stock of the Company in consideration for such debt, as of
the date of this report, the Company has no debt on its balance
sheet.
Manzano Acquisition
On
February 1, 2019, for consideration of $700,000, the Company
completed an asset purchase from Manzano, LLC and Manzano Energy
Partners II, LLC, whereby the Company purchased approximately
18,000 net leasehold acres, ownership and operated production from
one horizontal well currently producing from the San Andres play in
the Permian Basin, ownership of three additional shut-in wells, and
ownership of one saltwater disposal well. The Company
subsequently drilled one Manzano well in Phase Two of its 2019
development plan, which was completed in the fourth quarter of
2019.
Red Hawk Property Rights Sale
On
March 7, 2019, Red Hawk sold rights to 85.5 net acres of oil and
gas leases located in Weld County, Colorado, to a third party, for
aggregate proceeds of $1.2 million. The sale agreement included a
provision whereby the purchaser was required to assign Red Hawk 85
net acres of leaseholds in an area located where the Company
already owns other leases in Weld County, Colorado, within nine
months from the date of the sale, or to repay the Company up to
$200,000 (proportionally adjusted for the amount of leasehold
delivered). In December 2019, the purchaser assigned Redhawk 121
net acres of leaseholds with a value of $121,000, thereby
satisfying in full its obligations to Red Hawk under the sale
agreement.
Drilling and Workover Activities
In
December 2018, we commenced drilling four San Andres horizontal
wells in our Permian Basin Asset acreage acquired from Hunter Oil
Company in September 2018, which wells were completed in March
2019. Also, in February 2019, we completed workover operations to
reactivate a San Andres horizontal well, and in March 2019 we
completed the drilling of our fifth San Andres horizontal well,
both of which operations were conducted on our Permian Basin
acreage acquired from Manzano in February 2019. In July 2019, we
also commenced drilling four additional San Andres horizontal wells
in our Permian Basin Asset, for which drilling operations were
completed in September 2019, and for which recompletion operations
were completed in November and December of 2019. Also, we
participated in the drilling and completion of two horizontal wells
in August of 2019 and nine horizontal wells in October of 2019 in
our DJ-Basin Asset, which are operated by third-party
operators.
Additional San Andres Acquisition
Effective June 10,
2019, for consideration of $350,000, the Company completed an asset
purchase from a private operator, whereby the Company purchased
approximately 2,076 net leasehold acres, ownership and operated
production from 22 horizontal wells currently producing from the
San Andres play in the Permian Basin and ownership of three
injection wells.
Regulation of the Oil and Gas
Industry
All of
our oil and gas operations are substantially affected by federal,
state and local laws and regulations. Failure to comply with
applicable laws and regulations can result in substantial
penalties. The regulatory burden on the industry increases the cost
of doing business and affects profitability. Historically, our
compliance costs have not had a material adverse effect on our
results of operations; however, we are unable to predict the future
costs or impact of compliance.
Additional proposals and proceedings that affect
the oil and natural gas industry are regularly considered by
Congress, the states, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the
“FERC”) and
the courts. We cannot predict when or whether any such proposals
may become effective. We do not believe that we would be affected
by any such action materially differently than similarly situated
competitors.
At the
state level, our operations in Colorado are regulated by the
Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission (“COGCC”) and our New
Mexico operations are regulated by the Conservation Division of the
New Mexico Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department
(regulates oil and gas operations), New Mexico Environment
Department (administers environmental protection laws), and the New
Mexico State Land Office (oversees surface and mineral acres and
development). The Oil Conservation Division of the New Mexico
Energy, Minerals, Natural Resources Department, and New Mexico
State Land Office require the posting of financial assurance for
owners and operators on privately owned or state land within New
Mexico in order to provide for abandonment restoration and
remediation of wells, and for the drilling of salt water disposal
wells.
The COGCC regulates oil and gas operators through
rules, policies, written guidance, orders, permits, and
inspections. Among other things, the COGCC enforces specifications
regarding drilling, development, production, reclamation, enhanced
recovery, safety, aesthetics, noise, waste, flowlines, and
wildlife. In recent years, the COGCC has amended its existing
regulatory requirements and adopted new requirements with increased
frequency. For example, in January 2016, the COGCC approved new
rules that require local government consultation and certain best
management practices for large-scale oil and natural gas facilities
in certain urban mitigation areas. These rules also require
operator registration and/or notifications to local governments
with respect to future oil and natural gas drilling and production
facility locations. In February 2018, the COGCC comprehensively
amended its regulations for oil, gas, and water flowlines to expand
requirements addressing flowline registration and safety, integrity
management, leak detection, and other matters. The COGCC has also
adopted or amended numerous other rules in recent years, including
rules relating to safety, flood protection, and spill reporting. In
December 2018, the COGCC approved new rules that require new oil
and gas sites to be situated at least 1,000 feet away from school
properties such as playgrounds and athletic fields. Most recently, in 2019, Colorado
enacted Senate Bill 19-181 (“SB
19-181”),
which changes the mission of the COGCC from fostering responsible
and balanced development to regulating development to protect
public health and the environment and directs the COGCC to
undertake rulemaking on various operational matters including
environmental protection, facility siting and wellbore integrity.
Pursuant to this directive, in December 2019, the COGCC proposed
new regulatory requirements to enhance safety and environmental
protection during hydraulic fracturing and to enhance wellbore
integrity.
We anticipate that the COGCC, the
Conservation Division of the New Mexico Energy, Minerals, Natural
Resources Department, the New Mexico State Land Office, the New
Mexico Environment Department and other federal, state and local
authorities will continue to adopt new rules and regulations moving
forward which will likely affect our oil and gas operations, and
could make it more costly for our operations or limit our
activities. We routinely monitor our operations and new rules and
regulations which may affect our operations, to ensure that we
maintain compliance.
Regulation Affecting Production
The
production of oil and natural gas is subject to United States
federal and state laws and regulations, and orders of regulatory
bodies under those laws and regulations, governing a wide variety
of matters. All of the jurisdictions in which we own or operate
producing oil and natural gas properties have statutory provisions
regulating the exploration for and production of oil and natural
gas, including provisions related to permits for the drilling of
wells, bonding requirements to drill or operate wells, the location
of wells, the method of drilling and casing wells, the surface use
and restoration of properties upon which wells are drilled,
sourcing and disposal of water used in the drilling and completion
process, and the abandonment of wells. Our operations are also
subject to various conservation laws and regulations. These include
the regulation of the size of drilling and spacing units or
proration units, the number of wells which may be drilled in an
area, and the unitization or pooling of oil or natural gas wells,
as well as regulations that generally prohibit the venting or
flaring of natural gas, and impose certain requirements regarding
the ratability or fair apportionment of production from fields and
individual wells. These laws and regulations may limit the amount
of oil and gas we can drill. Moreover, each state generally imposes
a production or severance tax with respect to the production and
sale of oil, NGL and gas within its jurisdiction.
States
do not regulate wellhead prices or engage in other similar direct
regulation, but there can be no assurance that they will not do so
in the future. The effect of such future regulations may be to
limit the amounts of oil and gas that may be produced from our
wells, negatively affect the economics of production from these
wells or limit the number of locations we can drill.
The
failure to comply with the rules and regulations of oil and natural
gas production and related operations can result in substantial
penalties. Our competitors in the oil and natural gas industry are
subject to the same regulatory requirements and restrictions that
affect our operations.
Regulation Affecting Sales and Transportation of
Commodities
Sales
prices of gas, oil, condensate and NGL are not currently regulated
and are made at market prices. Although prices of these energy
commodities are currently unregulated, the United States Congress
historically has been active in their regulation. We cannot predict
whether new legislation to regulate oil and gas, or the prices
charged for these commodities might be proposed, what proposals, if
any, might actually be enacted by the United States Congress or the
various state legislatures and what effect, if any, the
proposals might have on our operations. Sales of oil and natural
gas may be subject to certain state and federal reporting
requirements.
The price and terms of service of transportation of the
commodities, including access to pipeline transportation capacity,
are subject to extensive federal and state regulation. Such
regulation may affect the marketing of oil and natural gas produced
by the Company, as well as the revenues received for sales of such
production. Gathering systems may be subject to state ratable take
and common purchaser statutes. Ratable take statutes generally
require gatherers to take, without undue discrimination, oil and
natural gas production that may be tendered to the gatherer for
handling. Similarly, common purchaser statutes generally require
gatherers to purchase, or accept for gathering, without undue
discrimination as to source of supply or producer. These statutes
are designed to prohibit discrimination in favor of one producer
over another producer or one source of supply over another source
of supply. These statutes may affect whether and to what extent
gathering capacity is available for oil and natural gas production,
if any, of the drilling program and the cost of such capacity.
Further state laws and regulations govern rates and terms of access
to intrastate pipeline systems, which may similarly affect market
access and cost.
The
FERC regulates interstate natural gas pipeline transportation rates
and service conditions. The FERC is continually proposing and
implementing new rules and regulations affecting interstate
transportation. The stated purpose of many of these regulatory
changes is to ensure terms and conditions of interstate
transportation service are not unduly discriminatory or unduly
preferential, to promote competition among the various sectors of
the natural gas industry and to promote market transparency. We do
not believe that our drilling program will be affected by any such
FERC action in a manner materially differently than other similarly
situated natural gas producers.
In addition to the regulation of natural gas
pipeline transportation, FERC has additional, jurisdiction over the
purchase or sale of gas or the purchase or sale of transportation
services subject to FERC’s jurisdiction pursuant to the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (“EPAct
2005”). Under the EPAct
2005, it is unlawful for “any
entity,” including
producers such as us, that are otherwise not subject to
FERC’s jurisdiction under the Natural Gas Act of 1938
(“NGA”) to use any deceptive or manipulative
device or contrivance in connection with the purchase or sale of
gas or the purchase or sale of transportation services subject to
regulation by FERC, in contravention of rules prescribed by FERC.
FERC’s rules implementing this provision make it unlawful, in
connection with the purchase or sale of gas subject to the
jurisdiction of FERC, or the purchase or sale of transportation
services subject to the jurisdiction of FERC, for any entity,
directly or indirectly, to use or employ any device, scheme or
artifice to defraud; to make any untrue statement of material fact
or omit to make any such statement necessary to make the statements
made not misleading; or to engage in any act or practice that
operates as a fraud or deceit upon any person. EPAct 2005 also
gives FERC authority to impose civil penalties for violations of
the NGA and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 up to
$1.2 million per day, per violation. The anti-manipulation
rule applies to activities of otherwise non-jurisdictional entities
to the extent the activities are conducted
“in connection
with” gas sales,
purchases or transportation subject to FERC jurisdiction, which
includes the annual reporting requirements under FERC Order
No. 704 (defined below).
In December 2007, FERC issued a final rule on the
annual natural gas transaction reporting requirements, as amended
by subsequent orders on rehearing (“Order
No. 704”). Under
Order No. 704, any market participant, including a producer
that engages in certain wholesale sales or purchases of gas that
equal or exceed 2.2 trillion BTUs of physical natural gas in
the previous calendar year, must annually report such sales and
purchases to FERC on Form No. 552 on May 1 of each year.
Form No. 552 contains aggregate volumes of natural gas
purchased or sold at wholesale in the prior calendar year to the
extent such transactions utilize, contribute to the formation of
price indices. Not all types of natural gas sales are required to
be reported on Form No. 552. It is the responsibility of the
reporting entity to determine which individual transactions should
be reported based on the guidance of Order No. 704. Order
No. 704 is intended to increase the transparency of
the wholesale gas markets and to assist FERC in monitoring
those markets and in detecting market
manipulation.
The FERC also regulates rates and terms and
conditions of service on interstate transportation of liquids,
including oil and NGL, under the Interstate Commerce Act, as it
existed on October 1, 1977 (“ICA”). Prices received from the sale of liquids
may be affected by the cost of transporting those products to
market. The ICA requires that certain interstate liquids pipelines
maintain a tariff on file with FERC. The tariff sets forth the
established rates as well as the rules and regulations governing
the service. The ICA requires, among other things, that rates and
terms and conditions of service on interstate common carrier
pipelines be “just and
reasonable.” Such
pipelines must also provide jurisdictional service in a manner that
is not unduly discriminatory or unduly preferential. Shippers have
the power to challenge new and existing rates and terms and
conditions of service before FERC.
The rates charged by many interstate liquids pipelines are
currently adjusted pursuant to an annual indexing methodology
established and regulated by FERC, under which pipelines increase
or decrease their rates in accordance with an index adjustment
specified by FERC. For the five-year period beginning July 1,
2016, FERC established an annual index adjustment equal to the
change in the producer price index for finished goods plus 1.23%.
This adjustment is subject to review every five years. Under
FERC’s regulations, a liquids pipeline can request a rate
increase that exceeds the rate obtained through application of the
indexing methodology by obtaining market-based rate authority
(demonstrating the pipeline lacks market power), establishing rates
by settlement with all existing shippers, or through a
cost-of-service approach (if the pipeline establishes that a
substantial divergence exists between the actual costs experienced
by the pipeline and the rates resulting from application of the
indexing methodology). Increases in liquids transportation rates
may result in lower revenue and cash flows for the
Company.
In
addition, due to common carrier regulatory obligations of liquids
pipelines, capacity must be prorated among shippers in an equitable
manner in the event there are nominations in excess of capacity or
for new shippers. Therefore, new shippers or increased volume by
existing shippers may reduce the capacity available to us. Any
prolonged interruption in the operation or curtailment of available
capacity of the pipelines that we rely upon for liquids
transportation could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows. However, we believe that access to liquids pipeline
transportation services generally will be available to us to the
same extent as to our similarly situated competitors.
Rates
for intrastate pipeline transportation of liquids are subject to
regulation by state regulatory commissions. The basis for
intrastate liquids pipeline regulation, and the degree of
regulatory oversight and scrutiny given to intrastate liquids
pipeline rates, varies from state to state. We believe that the
regulation of liquids pipeline transportation rates will not affect
our operations in any way that is materially different from the
effects on our similarly situated competitors.
In addition to FERC’s regulations, we are
required to observe anti-market manipulation laws with regard to
our physical sales of energy commodities. In November 2009, the
Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) issued regulations pursuant to the
Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, intended to prohibit
market manipulation in the petroleum industry. Violators of the
regulations face civil penalties of up to $1 million per
violation per day. In July 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank
Act, which incorporated an expansion of the authority of the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) to
prohibit market manipulation in the markets regulated by the CFTC.
This authority, with respect to oil swaps and futures contracts, is
similar to the anti-manipulation authority granted to the FTC with
respect to oil purchases and sales. In July 2011, the CFTC issued
final rules to implement their new anti-manipulation authority. The
rules subject violators to a civil penalty of up to the greater of
$1.1 million or triple the monetary gain to the person for
each violation.
Regulation of
Environmental and Occupational Safety and Health
Matters
Our operations are subject to stringent federal,
state and local laws and regulations governing occupational safety
and health aspects of our operations, the discharge of materials
into the environment and environmental protection. Numerous
governmental entities, including the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (“EPA”) and analogous state agencies have
the power to enforce compliance with these laws and regulations and
the permits issued under them, often requiring difficult and costly
actions. These laws and regulations may, among other things
(i) require the acquisition of permits to conduct drilling and
other regulated activities; (ii) restrict the types,
quantities and concentration of various substances that can be
released into the environment or injected into formations in
connection with oil and natural gas drilling and production
activities; (iii) limit or prohibit drilling activities on
certain lands lying within wilderness, wetlands and other protected
areas; (iv) require remedial measures to mitigate pollution
from former and ongoing operations, such as requirements to close
pits and plug abandoned wells; (v) apply specific health and
safety criteria addressing worker protection; and (vi) impose
substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from drilling and
production operations. Any failure to comply with these laws and
regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil
and criminal penalties, the imposition of corrective or remedial
obligations, the occurrence of delays or restrictions in permitting
or performance of projects, and the issuance of orders enjoining
performance of some or all of our operations.
These laws and regulations may also restrict the rate of oil and
natural gas production below the rate that would otherwise be
possible. The regulatory burden on the oil and natural gas industry
increases the cost of doing business in the industry and
consequently affects profitability. The trend in environmental
regulation is to place more restrictions and limitations on
activities that may affect the environment, and thus any changes in
environmental laws and regulations or re-interpretation of
enforcement policies that result in more stringent and costly well
drilling, construction, completion or water management activities,
or waste handling, storage transport, disposal, or remediation
requirements could have a material adverse effect on our financial
position and results of operations. We may be unable to pass on
such increased compliance costs to our customers. Moreover,
accidental releases or spills may occur in the course of our
operations, and we cannot assure you that we will not incur
significant costs and liabilities as a result of such releases or
spills, including any third-party claims for damage to property,
natural resources or persons. Continued compliance with existing
requirements is not expected to materially affect us. However,
there is no assurance that we will be able to remain in compliance
in the future with such existing or any new laws and regulations or
that such future compliance will not have a material adverse effect
on our business and operating results.
Additionally, on January 14, 2019, in
Martinez v.
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, the Colorado Supreme Court overturned a ruling
by the Colorado Court of Appeals that held that the Colorado Oil
& Gas Conservation Commission (“COGCC”) had
held that the COGCC concluded that it lacked statutory authority to
undertake a proposed rulemaking “to suspend the issuance of
permits that allow hydraulic fracturing until it can be done
without adversely impacting human health and safety and without
impairing Colorado’s atmospheric resource and climate system,
water, soil, wildlife, or other biological resources.” The
Colorado Court of Appeals concluded that Colorado’s Oil and
Gas Conservation Act mandated that oil and gas development
“be regulated subject to the protection of public health,
safety, and welfare, including protection of the environment and
wildlife resources.” In the
Colorado Supreme Court’s majority opinion, Justice Richard L.
Gabriel wrote the COGCC is required first to “foster the
development of oil and gas resources” and second “to
prevent and mitigate significant environmental impacts to the
extent necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare, but
only after taking into consideration cost-effectiveness and
technical feasibility.”
The
following is a summary of the more significant existing and
proposed environmental and occupational safety and health laws, as
amended from time to time, to which our business operations are or
may be subject and for which compliance may have a material adverse
impact on our capital expenditures, results of operations or
financial position.
Hazardous Substances and Wastes
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(“RCRA”),
and comparable state statutes, regulate the generation,
transportation, treatment, storage, disposal and cleanup of
hazardous and non-hazardous wastes. Pursuant to rules issued by the
EPA, the individual states administer some or all of the provisions
of RCRA, sometimes in conjunction with their own, more stringent
requirements. Drilling fluids, produced waters, and most of the
other wastes associated with the exploration, development, and
production of oil or natural gas, if properly handled, are
currently exempt from regulation as hazardous waste under RCRA and,
instead, are regulated under RCRA’s less stringent
non-hazardous waste provisions, state laws or other federal laws.
However, it is possible that certain oil and natural gas drilling
and production wastes now classified as non-hazardous could be
classified as hazardous wastes in the future. Stricter regulation of wastes generated during our
operations could result in an increase in our, as well as the oil
and natural gas exploration and production industry’s, costs
to manage and dispose of wastes, which could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
position.
In
December 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
approved a consent decree between the EPA and a coalition of
environmental groups. The consent decree requires the EPA to review
and determine whether it will revise the RCRA regulations for
exploration and production waste to treat such waste as hazardous
waste. In April 2019, the EPA, pursuant to the consent decree,
determined that revision of the regulations is not necessary.
Information comprising the EPA’s review and decision is
contained in a document entitled “Management of Exploration,
Development and Production Wastes: Factors Informing a Decision on
the Need for Regulatory Action”. The EPA indicated that it
will continue to work with states and other organizations to
identify areas for continued improvement and to address emerging
issues to ensure that exploration, development and production
wastes continue to be managed in a manner that is protective of
human health and the environment. Environmental groups, however,
expressed dissatisfaction with the EPA’s decision and will
likely continue to press the issue at the federal and state
levels.
The Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act
(“CERCLA”),
also known as the Superfund law, and comparable state laws impose
joint and several liability, without regard to fault or legality of
conduct, on classes of persons who are considered to be responsible
for the release of a hazardous substance into the environment.
These persons include the current and former owners and operators
of the site where the release occurred and anyone who disposed or
arranged for the disposal of a hazardous substance released at the
site. Under CERCLA, such persons may be subject to joint and
several liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous
substances that have been released into the environment, for
damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health
studies. CERCLA also authorizes the EPA and, in some instances,
third parties to act in response to threats to the public health or
the environment and to seek to recover from the responsible classes
of persons the costs they incur. In addition, it is not uncommon
for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims
for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the
hazardous substances released into the environment. We generate
materials in the course of our operations that may be regulated as
hazardous substances.
We
currently lease or operate numerous properties that have been used
for oil and natural gas exploration, production and processing for
many years. Although we believe that we have utilized operating and
waste disposal practices that were standard in the industry at the
time, hazardous substances, wastes, or petroleum hydrocarbons may
have been released on, under or from the properties owned or leased
by us, or on, under or from other locations, including off-site
locations, where such substances have been taken for treatment or
disposal. In addition, some of our properties have been operated by
third parties or by previous owners or operators whose treatment
and disposal of hazardous substances, wastes, or petroleum
hydrocarbons was not under our control. These properties and the
substances disposed or released on, under or from them may be
subject to CERCLA, RCRA and analogous state laws. Under such laws,
we could be required to undertake response or corrective measures,
which could include removal of previously disposed substances and
wastes, cleanup of contaminated property or performance of remedial
plugging or pit closure operations to prevent future contamination,
the costs of which could be substantial.
Water Discharges
The
federal Clean Water Act (“CWA”) and analogous
state laws impose strict controls concerning the discharge of
pollutants and fill material, including spills and leaks of crude
oil and other substances. The CWA also requires approval and/or
permits prior to construction, where construction will disturb
certain wetlands or other waters of the U.S. In June 2015, the EPA
issued a final rule that attempted to clarify the CWA’s
jurisdictional reach over “waters of the United States”
(“2015 Clean Water
Rule”) and replace the pre-existing 1986 rule and
guidance. In February 2018, the EPA issued a rule to delay the
applicability of the 2015 Clean Water Rule until February 2020, but
this delay rule was struck following a court challenge. Other
federal district courts, however, issued rulings temporarily
enjoining the applicability of the 2015 Clean Water Rule itself in
several states. Taken together, the 2015 Clean Water Rule has been
in effect in 22 states, including Colorado, and temporarily stayed
in 27 states (the 2015 Clean Water Rule was in effect in certain
counties in New Mexico and not in others). In those remaining
states, the 1986 rule and guidance remained in effect. In October
2019, the EPA and the USACE issued a final rule to repeal the 2015
Clean Water Rule (the “2019 Repeal Rule”). With
the 2019 Repeal Rule, the agencies report that they will implement
the pre-2015 Clean Water Rule regulations and guidance nationwide.
The 2019 Repeal Rule became effective on December 23, 2019;
accordingly, the 2015 Clean Water Rule is no longer in effect in
any state. However, numerous legal challenges to the 2019 Repeal
Rule have already been filed in federal court.
In
February 2019, the EPA and the USACE published a proposed new rule
that would differently revise the definition of “waters of
the United States” and essentially replace both the 1986 rule
and the 2015 Clean Water Rule. On January 23, 2020, the EPA and
USACE announced the final new rule, titled the Navigable Waters
Protection Rule (“2020 Rule”). The
2020 Rule will go into effect sixty days after publication in the
Federal Register. The 2020 Rule will generally regulate four
categories of “jurisdictional” waters:
(i) territorial seas and traditional navigable waters (i.e.,
large rivers); (ii) perennial and intermittent tributaries of
these waters; (iii) certain lakes, ponds and impoundments; and
(iv) wetlands to jurisdictional waters. The 2020 Rule also
includes 12 categories of exclusions, or
“non-jurisdictional” waters, including groundwater,
ephemeral features and diffuse stormwater run-off over upland
areas. In particular, the 2020 Rule will likely regulate fewer
wetlands areas than were regulated under the 1986 rule and the 2015
Clean Water Rule because it does not regulate wetlands that are not
adjacent to jurisdictional waters. Following publication, this new
definition of “waters of the United States” will likely
be challenged and sought to be enjoined in federal court. If and
when the 2020 Rule goes into effect, it will change the scope of
the CWA’s jurisdiction, which could result in increased costs
and delays with respect to obtaining permits for discharges of
pollutants or dredge and fill activities in waters of the U.S.,
including regulated wetland areas.
In
January 2017, the Army Corps of Engineers issued revised and
renewed streamlined general nationwide permits that are available
to satisfy permitting requirements for certain work in streams,
wetlands and other waters of the U.S. under Section 404 of the CWA
and the Rivers and Harbors Act. The new nationwide permits
took effect in March 2017, or when certified by each state,
whichever was later. The oil and gas industry broadly utilizes
nationwide permits 12, 14 and 39 for the construction, maintenance
and repair of pipelines, roads and drill pads, respectively, and
related structures in waters of the U.S. that impact less than a
half-acre of waters of the U.S. and meet the other criteria of each
nationwide permit.
The CWA
also regulates storm water run-off from crude oil and natural gas
facilities and requires storm water discharge permits for certain
activities. Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure
(“SPCC”) requirements
of the CWA require appropriate secondary containment, load out
controls, piping controls, berms and other measures to help prevent
the contamination of navigable waters in the event of a petroleum
hydrocarbon spill, rupture or leak.
Subsurface Injections
In the course of our operations, we produce water
in addition to oil and natural gas. Water that is not recycled may
be disposed of in disposal wells, which inject the produced water
into non-producing subsurface formations. Underground injection
operations are regulated pursuant to the Underground Injection
Control (“UIC”) program established under the
federal Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”) and
analogous state laws. The UIC program requires permits from the EPA
or an analogous state agency for the construction and operation of
disposal wells, establishes minimum standards for disposal well
operations, and restricts the types and quantities of fluids that
may be disposed. A change in UIC disposal well regulations or the
inability to obtain permits for new disposal wells in the future
may affect our ability to dispose of produced water and ultimately
increase the cost of our operations. For example, in response to recent seismic events
near belowground disposal wells used for the injection of oil and
natural gas-related wastewaters, regulators in some states,
including Colorado, have imposed more stringent permitting and
operating requirements for produced water disposal wells. In
Colorado, permit applications are reviewed specifically to evaluate
seismic activity and, as of 2011, the state has required operators
to identify potential faults near proposed wells, if earthquakes
historically occurred in the area, and to accept maximum injection
pressures and volumes based on fracture gradient as conditions to
permit approval. Additionally, legal disputes may arise based on
allegations that disposal well operations have caused damage to
neighboring properties or otherwise violated state or federal rules
regulating waste disposal. These developments could result in
additional regulation, restriction on the use of injection wells by
us or by commercial disposal well vendors whom we may use from time
to time to dispose of wastewater, and increased costs of
compliance, which could have a material adverse effect on our
capital expenditures and operating costs, financial condition, and
results of operations.
Air Emissions
Our operations are subject to the Clean Air Act
(the “CAA”) and comparable state and local
requirements. The CAA contains provisions that may result in the
gradual imposition of certain pollution control requirements with
respect to air emissions from our operations. The EPA and state
governments continue to develop regulations to implement these
requirements. We may be required to make certain capital
investments in the next several years for air pollution control
equipment in connection with maintaining or obtaining operating
permits and approvals addressing other air emission-related
issues.
In
June 2016, the EPA implemented new requirements focused on
achieving additional methane and volatile organic compound
reductions from the oil and natural gas industry. The rules
imposed, among other things, new requirements for leak detection
and repair, control requirements for oil well completions,
replacement of certain pneumatic pumps and controllers and
additional control requirements for gathering, boosting and
compressor stations. In September 2018, the EPA proposed revisions
to the 2016 rules. The proposed amendments address certain
technical issues raised in administrative petitions and include
proposed changes to, among other things, the frequency of
monitoring for fugitive emissions at well sites and compressor
stations. In September 2019, the EPA proposed certain policy
amendments to the 2016 rules that would remove all sources in the
transmission and storage segment of the oil and natural gas
industry from regulation. The proposed amendments would also
rescind the methane requirements in the 2016 rules that apply to
sources in the production and processing segments of the industry.
The EPA is also proposing, in the alternative, to rescind the
methane requirements that apply to all sources in the oil and
natural gas industry, without removing any sources from the current
source category.
In
November 2016, the BLM finalized rules to further regulate venting,
flaring and leaks during oil and natural gas production activities
on onshore federal and Indian leases. The rules require additional
controls and impose new emissions and other standards on certain
operations on applicable leases, including committed state or
private tracts in a federally approved unit or communitized
agreement that drains federal minerals. In September 2018, the BLM
published a final rule that revises the 2016 rules. The new rule,
among other things, rescinds the 2016 rule requirements related to
waste-minimization plans, gas-capture percentages, well drilling,
well completion and related operations, pneumatic controllers,
pneumatic diaphragm pumps, storage vessels and leak detection and
repair. The new rule also revised provisions related to venting and
flaring. Environmental groups and the States of California and New
Mexico have filed challenges to the 2018 rule in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of
California.
In 2016, the EPA increased the state of
Colorado’s non-attainment ozone classification for the Denver
Metro North Front Range Ozone Eight-Hour Non-Attainment
(“Denver Metro/North
Front Range NAA”) area from “marginal” to
“moderate” under the 2008 national ambient air quality
standard (“NAAQS”).
This increase in non-attainment status triggered significant
additional obligations for the state under the CAA and resulted in
Colorado adopting new and more stringent air quality control
requirements in November 2017 that are applicable to our
operations. In 2019, the EPA increased the state of
Colorado’s non-attainment ozone classification for the Denver
Metro/North Front Range NAA area from “moderate” to
“serious” under the 2008 NAAQS. This
“serious” classification will trigger significant
additional obligations for the state under the CAA and could result
in new and more stringent air quality control requirements, which
may in turn result in significant costs, and delays in obtaining
necessary permits applicable to our
operations.
SB 19-181 also requires, among other things, that
the Air Quality Control Commission (“AQCC”) adopt
additional rules to minimize emissions of methane and other
hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides from the entire oil and gas fuel
cycle. The AQCC anticipates holding several rulemakings over the
next several years to implement the requirements of SB 19-181,
including a rulemaking to require continuous emission monitoring
equipment at oil and gas facilities. In December 2019, the AQCC
held the first of several rulemakings that are anticipated as a
result of SB 19-181. As part of that rulemaking, the AQCC adopted
significant additional and new emission control requirements
applicable to oil and gas operations, including, for example,
hydrocarbon liquids unloading control requirements and increased
LDAR frequencies for facilities in certain proximity to occupied
areas.
State-level rules
applicable to our operations include regulations imposed by the
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment’s
(“CDPHE”) Air Quality
Control Commission, including stringent requirements relating to
monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting matters. In October 2019,
the CDPHE published a human health risk assessment for oil and gas
operations in Colorado, which used oil and gas emission data to
model possible human exposure and found a possibility of negative
health impacts at distances up to 2,000 feet away under worst case
conditions. In response, the COGCC announced that it will more
rigorously scrutinize permit applications for wells within 2,000
feet of a building unit, work with CDPHE to obtain better
site-specific data on oil and gas emissions, and consider the
resulting data for possible future rulemaking.
Regulation of GHG Emissions
The EPA
has published findings that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane
and other greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) present an
endangerment to public health and the environment because such
emissions are, according to the EPA, contributing to warming of the
earth’s atmosphere and other climatic changes. These findings
provide the basis for the EPA to adopt and implement regulations
that would restrict emissions of GHGs under existing provisions of
the CAA. In June 2010, the EPA began regulating GHG emissions from
stationary sources.
In the
past, Congress has considered proposed legislation to reduce
emissions of GHGs. To date, Congress has not adopted any such
significant legislation, but could do so in the future. In
addition, many states and regions have taken legal measures to
reduce emissions of GHGs, primarily through the planned development
of GHG emission inventories and/or regional GHG cap and trade
programs. In February 2014, November 2017 and December 2019,
Colorado adopted rules regulating methane emissions from the oil
and gas sector.
The
Obama administration reached an agreement during the December 2015
United Nations climate change conference in Paris pursuant to which
the U.S. initially pledged to make a 26 percent to 28 percent
reduction in its GHG emissions by 2025,
against a 2005 baseline, and committed to periodically update this
pledge every five years starting in 2020 (the “Paris Agreement”). In
June 2017, President Trump announced that the U.S. would initiate
the formal process to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. In
November 2019, the U.S. formally notified the United Nations of its
intentions to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. The notification
begins a one-year process to complete the withdrawal.
Regulation of
methane and other GHG emissions associated with oil and natural gas
production could impose significant requirements and costs on our
operations.
Regulation of Flowlines
In
February 2018, the COGCC comprehensively amended its regulations
for oil, gas and water flowlines in Colorado to expand requirements
addressing flowline registration and safety, integrity management,
leak detection and other matters. In November 2019, the COGCC
further amended its flowline regulations pursuant to SB 19-181 to
impose additional requirements regarding flowline mapping,
operational status, certification and abandonment, among other
things. The COGCC has also adopted or amended numerous other rules
in recent years, including rules relating to safety, flood
protection and spill reporting.
Hydraulic Fracturing Activities
Hydraulic fracturing is an important and
common practice that is used to stimulate production of natural gas
and/or oil from dense subsurface rock formations. We regularly use
hydraulic fracturing as part of our operations. Hydraulic
fracturing involves the injection of water, sand or alternative
proppant and chemicals under pressure into targeted geological
formations to fracture the surrounding rock and stimulate
production. Hydraulic fracturing is typically regulated by
state oil and natural gas commissions. However, several federal
agencies have asserted regulatory authority over certain aspects of
the process. For example, in
December 2016, the EPA released its final report on the potential
impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources,
concluding that “water cycle” activities associated
with hydraulic fracturing may impact drinking water resources under
certain circumstances. Additionally, the EPA published in June 2016
an effluent limitations guideline final rule pursuant to its
authority under the SDWA prohibiting the discharge of wastewater
from onshore unconventional oil and natural gas extraction
facilities to publicly owned wastewater treatment plants; asserted
regulatory authority in 2014 under the SDWA over hydraulic
fracturing activities involving the use of diesel and issued
guidance covering such activities; and issued in 2014 a
prepublication of its Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
regarding Toxic Substances Control Act reporting of the chemical
substances and mixtures used in hydraulic fracturing. Also, the BLM
published a final rule in March 2015 establishing new or more
stringent standards for performing hydraulic fracturing on federal
and American Indian lands including well casing and wastewater
storage requirements and an obligation for exploration and
production operators to disclose what chemicals they are using in
fracturing activities. However, following years of litigation, the
BLM rescinded the rule in December 2017. Additionally, from time to
time, legislation has been introduced, but not enacted, in Congress
to provide for federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing and to
require disclosure of the chemicals used in the fracturing process.
In the event that a new, federal level of legal restrictions
relating to the hydraulic fracturing process is adopted in areas
where we operate, we may incur additional costs to comply with such
federal requirements that may be significant in nature, and also
could become subject to additional permitting requirements and
experience added delays or curtailment in the pursuit of
exploration, development, or production
activities.
At
the state level, Colorado, where we conduct significant operations,
is among the states that has adopted, and other states are
considering adopting, regulations that could impose new or more
stringent permitting, disclosure or well-construction requirements
on hydraulic fracturing operations. Moreover, states could elect to
prohibit high volume hydraulic fracturing altogether, following the
approach taken by the State of New York in 2015. Also, certain
interest groups in Colorado opposed to oil and natural gas
development generally, and hydraulic fracturing in particular, have
from time to time advanced various options for ballot initiatives
that, if approved, would allow revisions to the state constitution
in a manner that would make such exploration and production
activities in the state more difficult in the future. However,
during the November 2016 voting process, one proposed amendment
placed on the Colorado state ballot making it relatively more
difficult to place an initiative on the state ballot was passed by
the voters. As a result, there are more stringent procedures now in
place for placing an initiative on a state ballot. In addition to
state laws, local land use restrictions may restrict drilling or
the hydraulic fracturing process and cities may adopt local
ordinances allowing hydraulic fracturing activities within their
jurisdictions but regulating the time, place and manner of those
activities.
For example,
on November 6, 2018, registered
voters in the State of Colorado cast their ballots and rejected
Proposition 112 (“Prop.
112”), with 55% of
ballots cast against the measure. Prop. 112 would have created a
rigid 2,500-foot setback from oil and gas facilities to the nearest
occupied structure and other “vulnerable areas,” which
included parks, ball fields, open space, streams, lakes and
intermittent streams. It would have dramatically increased the
amount of surface area off-limits to new energy development by 26
times and put 94% of private land in the top five oil and
gas producing counties in the State of Colorado off-limits to new
development. See further
discussion in “Part
I” – “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Passed in Colorado in 2019, SB 19-181 gives local
governmental authorities increased authority to regulate oil
and gas development. The authors of the legislation were clear that
SB 19-181 was not intended to allow an outright ban on oil and gas
development. However, anti-industry activists in Longmont,
Colorado, have argued in court that SB 19-181 permits a local
governmental authority to impose such a ban. We primarily operate
in the rural areas of the Wattenberg Field in Weld and Morgan
Counties, jurisdictions in which there has historically been
significant support for the oil and gas industry.
If
new or more stringent federal, state or local legal restrictions
relating to the hydraulic fracturing process are adopted in areas
where we operate, including, for example, on federal and American
Indian lands, we could incur potentially significant added costs to
comply with such requirements, experience delays or curtailment in
the pursuit of exploration, development or production activities,
and perhaps even be precluded from drilling wells.
In the event that local or state restrictions or prohibitions are
adopted in areas where we conduct operations, that impose more
stringent limitations on the production and development of oil and
natural gas, including, among other things, the development of
increased setback distances, we and similarly situated oil and
natural exploration and production operators in the state may incur
significant costs to comply with such requirements or may
experience delays or curtailment in the pursuit of exploration,
development, or production activities, and possibly be limited or
precluded in the drilling of wells or in the amounts that we and
similarly situated operates are ultimately able to produce from our
reserves. Any such increased costs, delays, cessations,
restrictions or prohibitions could have a material adverse effect
on our business, prospects, results of operations, financial
condition, and liquidity. If new or more stringent federal, state
or local legal restrictions relating to the hydraulic fracturing
process are adopted in areas where we operate, including, for
example, on federal and American Indian lands, we could incur
potentially significant added cost to comply with such
requirements, experience delays or curtailment in the pursuit of
exploration, development or production activities, and perhaps even
be precluded from drilling wells.
Moreover,
because most of our operations are conducted in two particular
areas, the Permian Basin in New Mexico and the D-J Basin in
Colorado, legal restrictions imposed in that area will have a
significantly greater adverse effect than if we had our operations
spread out amongst several diverse geographic areas. Consequently,
in the event that local or state restrictions or prohibitions are
adopted in the Permian Basin in New Mexico and/or the D-J Basin in
Colorado that impose more stringent limitations on the production
and development of oil and natural gas, we may incur significant
costs to comply with such requirements or may experience delays or
curtailment in the pursuit of exploration, development, or
production activities, and possibly be limited or precluded in the
drilling of wells or in the amounts that we are ultimately able to
produce from our reserves. Any such increased costs, delays,
cessations, restrictions or prohibitions could have a material
adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations,
financial condition, and liquidity.
Activities on Federal Lands
Oil and natural gas exploration, development and
production activities on federal lands, including American Indian
lands and lands administered by the BLM, are subject to the
National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”).
NEPA requires federal agencies, including the BLM, to evaluate
major agency actions having the potential to significantly impact
the environment. In the course of such evaluations, an agency will
prepare an Environmental Assessment that assesses the potential
direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of a proposed project and,
if necessary, will prepare a more detailed Environmental Impact
Statement that may be made available for public review and comment.
While we currently have no exploration, development and production
activities on federal lands, our future exploration, development
and production activities may include leasing of federal mineral
interests, which will require the acquisition of governmental
permits or authorizations that are subject to the requirements of
NEPA. This process has the potential to delay or limit, or increase
the cost of, the development of oil and natural gas projects.
Authorizations under NEPA are also subject to protest, appeal or
litigation, any or all of which may delay or halt projects.
Moreover, depending on the mitigation strategies recommended in
Environmental Assessments or Environmental Impact Statements, we
could incur added costs, which may be
substantial.
Endangered Species and Migratory Birds Considerations
The federal Endangered Species Act
(“ESA”), and comparable state laws were
established to protect endangered and threatened species. Pursuant
to the ESA, if a species is listed as threatened or endangered,
restrictions may be imposed on activities adversely affecting that
species or that species’ habitat. Similar protections are
offered to migrating birds under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. We
may conduct operations on oil and natural gas leases in areas where
certain species that are listed as threatened or endangered are
known to exist and where other species, such as the sage grouse,
that potentially could be listed as threatened or endangered under
the ESA may exist. Moreover, as a result of one or more agreements
entered into by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the agency is
required to make a determination on listing of numerous species as
endangered or threatened under the ESA pursuant to specific
timelines. The identification or designation of previously
unprotected species as threatened or endangered in areas where
underlying property operations are conducted could cause us to
incur increased costs arising from species protection measures,
time delays or limitations on our exploration and production
activities that could have an adverse impact on our ability to
develop and produce reserves. If we were to have a portion of our
leases designated as critical or suitable habitat, it could
adversely impact the value of our leases.
OSHA
We are subject to the requirements of the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(“OSHA”) and
comparable state statutes whose purpose is to protect the health
and safety of workers. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication
standard, the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
and comparable state statutes and any implementing regulations
require that we organize and/or disclose information about
hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and that
this information be provided to employees, state and local
governmental authorities and citizens.
Private Lawsuits
Lawsuits
have been filed against other operators in several states,
including Colorado, alleging contamination of drinking water as a
result of hydraulic fracturing activities.
Related Permits and Authorizations
Many
environmental laws require us to obtain permits or other
authorizations from state and/or federal agencies before initiating
certain drilling, construction, production, operation, or other oil
and natural gas activities, and to maintain these permits and
compliance with their requirements for on-going operations. These
permits are generally subject to protest, appeal, or litigation,
which can in certain cases delay or halt projects and cease
production or operation of wells, pipelines, and other
operations.
We are
not able to predict the timing, scope and effect of any currently
proposed or future laws or regulations regarding hydraulic
fracturing, but the direct and indirect costs of such laws and
regulations (if enacted) could materially and adversely affect
our business, financial conditions and results of operations. See
further discussion in “Part I” –
“Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Insurance
Our oil
and gas properties are subject to hazards inherent in the oil and
gas industry, such as accidents, blowouts, explosions, implosions,
fires and oil spills. These conditions can cause:
●
|
damage
to or destruction of property, equipment and the
environment;
|
|
|
●
|
personal
injury or loss of life; and
|
|
|
●
|
suspension
of operations.
|
We
maintain insurance coverage that we believe to be customary in the
industry against these types of hazards. However, we may not be
able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at rates we
consider reasonable. In addition, our insurance is subject to
coverage limits and some policies exclude coverage for damages
resulting from environmental contamination. The occurrence of a
significant event or adverse claim in excess of the insurance
coverage that we maintain or that is not covered by insurance could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operations.
Employees
At
December 31, 2019, we employed 16 people and also utilize the
services of independent contractors to perform various field and
other services. Our future success will depend partially on our
ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. We are
not a party to any collective bargaining agreements and have not
experienced any strikes or work stoppages. We consider our
relations with our employees to be satisfactory.
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the risks described below as well as
the other information in this filing before deciding to invest in
our company. Any of the risk factors described below could
significantly and adversely affect our business, prospects,
financial condition and results of operations. Additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known or that are currently considered
to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our
business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
As a result, the trading price or value of our common stock could
be materially adversely affected and you may lose all or part of
your investment.
Risks Related to the Oil, NGL and Natural Gas Industry and Our
Business
Declines in oil and, to a lesser extent, NGL and natural gas
prices, will adversely affect our business, financial condition or
results of operations and our ability to meet our capital
expenditure obligations or targets and financial
commitments.
The price we receive for our oil and, to a lesser
extent, natural gas and NGLs, heavily influences our revenue,
profitability, cash flows, liquidity, access to capital, present
value and quality of our reserves, the nature and scale of our
operations and future rate of growth. Oil, NGL and natural gas are
commodities and, therefore, their prices are subject to wide
fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in supply and
demand. In recent years, the markets for oil and natural gas have
been volatile. These markets will likely continue to be volatile in
the future. Further, oil prices and natural gas prices do not
necessarily fluctuate in direct relation to each other.
Because approximately 88% of our estimated proved reserves as of
December 31, 2019 were oil, our financial results are more
sensitive to movements in oil prices.
The price of crude oil has experienced significant volatility over
the last five years, with the price per barrel of West Texas
Intermediate (“WTI”) crude rising from a low of $27 in
February 2016 to a high of $76 in October 2018, then, in 2020, most
recently dropping and remaining in the low $20’s per barrel
due in part to reduced global demand stemming from the recent
global COVID-19 outbreak. A prolonged period of low market prices
for oil and natural gas, or further declines in the market prices
for oil and natural gas, will likely result in capital expenditures
being further curtailed and will adversely affect our business,
financial condition and liquidity and our ability to meet
obligations, targets or financial commitments and could ultimately
lead to restructuring or filing for bankruptcy, which would have a
material adverse effect on our stock price and indebtedness.
Additionally, lower oil and natural gas prices may cause further
decline in our stock price. During the year ended December 31,
2019, the daily NYMEX WTI oil spot price ranged from a high of
$66.24 per Bbl to a low of $46.31 per Bbl and the NYMEX natural gas
Henry Hub spot price ranged from a high of $4.25 per MMBtu to a low
of $1.75 per MMBtu.
We have a limited operating history and expect to continue to incur
losses for an indeterminable period of time.
We have a limited operating history and are
engaged in the initial stages of exploration, development and
exploitation of our leasehold acreage and will continue to be so
until commencement of substantial production from our oil and
natural gas properties, which will depend upon successful drilling
results, additional and timely capital funding, and access to
suitable infrastructure. Companies in their initial stages of
development face substantial business risks and may suffer
significant losses. We have generated substantial net losses and
negative cash flows from operating activities in the past and
expect to continue to incur substantial net losses as we continue
our drilling program. In considering an investment in our common
stock, you should consider that there is only limited historical
and financial operating information available upon which to base
your evaluation of our performance. We have incurred net losses
of $95,596,000 from the date of inception (February 9,
2011) through December 31, 2019. Additionally, we are
dependent on obtaining additional debt and/or equity financing to
roll-out and scale our planned principal business operations.
Management’s plans in regard to these matters consist
principally of seeking additional debt and/or equity financing
combined with expected cash flows from current oil and gas assets
held and additional oil and gas assets that we may acquire. Our
efforts may not be successful and funds may not be available on
favorable terms, if at all.
We
face challenges and uncertainties in financial planning as a result
of the unavailability of historical data and uncertainties
regarding the nature, scope and results of our future activities.
New companies must develop successful business relationships,
establish operating procedures, hire staff, install management
information and other systems, establish facilities and obtain
licenses, as well as take other measures necessary to conduct their
intended business activities. We may not be successful in
implementing our business strategies or in completing the
development of the infrastructure necessary to conduct our business
as planned. In the event that one or more of our drilling programs
is not completed or is delayed or terminated, our operating results
will be adversely affected and our operations will differ
materially from the activities described in this Annual Report and
our subsequent periodic reports. As a result of industry factors or
factors relating specifically to us, we may have to change our
methods of conducting business, which may cause a material adverse
effect on our results of operations and financial condition. The
uncertainty and risks described in this Annual Report may impede
our ability to economically find, develop, exploit and acquire oil
and natural gas reserves. As a result, we may not be able to
achieve or sustain profitability or positive cash flows provided by
our operating activities in the future.
We will need additional capital to complete future acquisitions,
conduct our operations and fund our business beyond 2020, and our
ability to obtain the necessary funding is uncertain.
We
will need to raise additional funding to complete future potential
acquisitions and will be required to raise additional funds through
public or private debt or equity financing or other various means
to fund our operations and complete exploration and drilling
operations beyond 2020 (which 2020 plan is fully funded), and
acquire assets. In such a case, adequate funds may not be available
when needed or may not be available on favorable terms. If we need
to raise additional funds in the future by issuing equity
securities, dilution to existing stockholders will result, and such
securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to
those of our common stock. If funding is insufficient at any time
in the future and we are unable to generate sufficient revenue from
new business arrangements, to complete planned acquisitions or
operations, our results of operations and the value of our
securities could be adversely affected.
Additionally,
due to the nature of oil and gas interests, i.e., that rates of
production generally decline over time as oil and gas reserves are
depleted, if we are unable to drill additional wells and develop
our reserves, either because we are unable to raise sufficient
funding for such development activities, or otherwise, or in the
event we are unable to acquire additional operating properties, we
believe that our revenues will continue to decline over time.
Furthermore, in the event we are unable to raise additional
required funding in the future, we will not be able to participate
in the drilling of additional wells, will not be able to complete
other drilling and/or workover activities, and may not be able to
make required payments on our outstanding liabilities.
If
this were to happen, we may be forced to scale back our business
plan, sell or liquidate assets to satisfy outstanding debts, all of
which could result in the value of our outstanding securities
declining in value.
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet any
future debt service and other obligations due to events beyond our
control.
Our
ability to generate cash flows from operations, to make payments on
or refinance potential future indebtedness and to fund working
capital needs and planned capital expenditures will depend on our
future financial performance and our ability to generate cash in
the future. Our future financial performance will be affected by a
range of economic, financial, competitive, business and other
factors that we cannot control, such as general economic,
legislative, regulatory and financial conditions in our industry,
the economy generally, the price of oil and other risks described
below. A significant reduction in operating cash flows resulting
from changes in economic, legislative or regulatory conditions,
increased competition or other events beyond our control could
increase the need for additional or alternative sources of
liquidity and could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations, prospects and our
ability to service future potential debt and other obligations. If
we are unable to service future potential indebtedness or to fund
our other liquidity needs, we may be forced to adopt an alternative
strategy that may include actions such as reducing or delaying
capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing
such indebtedness, seeking additional capital, or any combination
of the foregoing. If we raise debt, it would increase our interest
expense, leverage and our operating and financial costs. We cannot
assure you that any of these alternative strategies could be
affected on satisfactory terms, if at all, or that they would yield
sufficient funds to make required payments on future potential
indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. Reducing or
delaying capital expenditures or selling assets could delay future
cash flows. In addition, the terms of future debt agreements may
restrict us from adopting any of these alternatives. We cannot
assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flows
from operations or that future borrowings will be available in an
amount sufficient to enable us to pay such future potential
indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs.
If
for any reason we are unable to meet our future potential debt
service and repayment obligations, we may be in default under the
terms of the agreements governing such indebtedness, which could
allow our creditors at that time to declare such outstanding
indebtedness to be due and payable. Under these circumstances, our
lenders could compel us to apply all of our available cash to repay
our borrowings. In addition, the lenders under our credit
facilities or other secured indebtedness could seek to foreclose on
any of our assets that are their collateral. If the amounts
outstanding under such indebtedness were to be accelerated, or were
the subject of foreclosure actions, our assets may not be
sufficient to repay in full the money owed to the lenders or to our
other debt holders.
All of our crude oil, natural gas and NGLs production is located in
the Permian Basin and the D-J Basin, making us vulnerable to risks
associated with operating in only two geographic areas. In
addition, we have a large amount of proved reserves attributable to
a small number of producing formations.
Our
operations are focused solely in the Permian Basin located in
Chaves and Roosevelt Counties, New Mexico, and the D-J Basin of
Weld and Morgan Counties, Colorado, which means our current
producing properties and new drilling opportunities are
geographically concentrated in those two areas. Because our
operations are not as diversified geographically as many of our
competitors, the success of our operations and our profitability
may be disproportionately exposed to the effect of any regional
events, including:
|
●
|
fluctuations
in prices of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs produced from the
wells in these areas;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
natural
disasters such as the flooding that occurred in the D-J Basin area
in September 2013;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
effects of local quarantines;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
restrictive
governmental regulations; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
curtailment
of production or interruption in the availability of gathering,
processing or transportation infrastructure and services, and any
resulting delays or interruptions of production from existing or
planned new wells.
|
For
example, bottlenecks in processing and transportation that have
occurred in some recent periods in the Permian Basin and D-J Basin
may negatively affect our results of operations, and these adverse
effects may be disproportionately severe to us compared to our more
geographically diverse competitors. Similarly, the concentration of
our assets within a small number of producing formations exposes us
to risks, such as changes in field-wide rules that could adversely
affect development activities or production relating to those
formations. Such an event could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, in
areas where exploration and production activities are increasing,
as has been the case in recent years in the Permian Basin and D-J
Basin, the demand for, and cost of, drilling rigs, equipment,
supplies, personnel and oilfield services increase. Shortages or
the high cost of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel or
oilfield services could delay or adversely affect our development
and exploration operations or cause us to incur significant
expenditures that are not provided for in our capital forecast,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition or results of operations. Finally, our
operations in New Mexico or Colorado may be negatively affected by
quarantines put in place in New Mexico or Colorado in an effort to
slow the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus or other viruses or
diseases.
Drilling for and producing oil and natural gas are highly
speculative and involve a high degree of risk, with many
uncertainties that could adversely affect our business. We have not
recorded significant proved reserves, and areas that we decide to
drill may not yield oil or natural gas in commercial quantities or
at all.
Exploring
for and developing hydrocarbon reserves involves a high degree of
operational and financial risk, which precludes us from
definitively predicting the costs involved and time required to
reach certain objectives. Our potential drilling locations are in
various stages of evaluation, ranging from locations that are ready
to drill, to locations that will require substantial additional
interpretation before they can be drilled. The budgeted costs of
planning, drilling, completing and operating wells are often
exceeded, and such costs can increase significantly due to various
complications that may arise during the drilling and operating
processes. Before a well is spudded, we may incur significant
geological and geophysical (seismic) costs, which are incurred
whether a well eventually produces commercial quantities of
hydrocarbons or is drilled at all. Exploration wells bear a much
greater risk of loss than development wells. The analogies we draw
from available data from other wells, more fully explored locations
or producing fields may not be applicable to our drilling
locations. If our actual drilling and development costs are
significantly more than our estimated costs, we may not be able to
continue our operations as proposed and could be forced to modify
our drilling plans accordingly.
If
we decide to drill a certain location, there is a risk that no
commercially productive oil or natural gas reservoirs will be found
or produced. We may drill or participate in new wells that are not
productive. We may drill wells that are productive, but that do not
produce sufficient net revenues to return a profit after drilling,
operating and other costs. There is no way to predict in advance of
drilling and testing whether any particular location will yield oil
or natural gas in sufficient quantities to recover exploration,
drilling or completion costs or to be economically viable. Even if
sufficient amounts of oil or natural gas exist, we may damage the
potentially productive hydrocarbon-bearing formation or experience
mechanical difficulties while drilling or completing the well,
resulting in a reduction in production and reserves from the well
or abandonment of the well. Whether a well is ultimately productive
and profitable depends on a number of additional factors, including
the following:
|
●
|
general
economic and industry conditions, including the prices received for
oil and natural gas;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
shortages
of, or delays in, obtaining equipment, including hydraulic
fracturing equipment, and qualified personnel;
|
|
●
|
potential
significant water production which could make a producing well
uneconomic, particularly in the Permian Basin Asset, where abundant
water production is a known risk;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
potential
drainage by operators on adjacent properties;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
loss
of, or damage to, oilfield development and service
tools;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
problems
with title to the underlying properties;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
increases
in severance taxes;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
adverse
weather conditions that delay drilling activities or cause
producing wells to be shut down;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
domestic
and foreign governmental regulations; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
proximity
to and capacity of transportation facilities.
|
If
we do not drill productive and profitable wells in the future, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Our success is dependent on the prices of oil, NGLs and natural
gas. Low oil or natural gas prices and the substantial volatility
in these prices may adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our
capital expenditure requirements and financial
obligations.
The
prices we receive for our oil, NGLs and natural gas heavily
influence our revenue, profitability, cash flow available for
capital expenditures, access to capital and future rate of growth.
Oil, NGLs and natural gas are commodities and, therefore,
their prices are subject to wide fluctuations in response to
relatively minor changes in supply and demand. Historically, the
commodities market has been volatile. For example, the price of
crude oil has experienced significant volatility over the last five
years, with the price per barrel of WTI crude rising from a low of
$27 in February 2016 to a high of $76 in October 2018, then most
recently dropping and remaining in the low $20’s per barrel
due in part to reduced global demand stemming from the recent
global novel coronavirus outbreak. Prices for natural gas and NGLs
experienced declines of similar magnitude. An extended period of
continued lower oil prices, or additional price declines, will have
further adverse effects on us. The prices we receive for our
production, and the levels of our production, will continue to
depend on numerous factors, including the following:
|
●
|
the
domestic and foreign supply of oil, NGLs and natural
gas;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
domestic and foreign demand for oil, NGLs and natural
gas;
|
|
●
|
the
prices and availability of competitors’ supplies of oil,
NGLs and natural gas;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or
OPEC, and state-controlled oil companies relating to oil price and
production controls;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
price and quantity of foreign imports of oil, NGLs and natural
gas;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
impact of U.S. dollar exchange rates on oil, NGLs and natural
gas prices;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
domestic
and foreign governmental regulations and taxes;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
speculative
trading of oil, NGLs and natural gas futures
contracts;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
localized
supply and demand fundamentals, including the availability,
proximity and capacity of gathering and transportation systems for
natural gas;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
availability of refining capacity;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
prices and availability of alternative fuel sources;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
threat, or perceived threat, or results, of viral pandemics, for
example, as experienced with the COVID-19 pandemic in early
2020;
|
|
●
|
weather
conditions and natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
political
conditions in or affecting oil, NGLs and natural gas producing
regions, including the Middle East and South America;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
continued threat of terrorism and the impact of military action and
civil unrest;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
public
pressure on, and legislative and regulatory interest within,
federal, state and local governments to stop, significantly limit
or regulate hydraulic fracturing activities;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
level of global oil, NGL and natural gas inventories and
exploration and production activity;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
authorization
of exports from the Unites States of liquefied natural
gas;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
impact of energy conservation efforts;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
technological
advances affecting energy consumption; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
overall
worldwide economic conditions.
|
Declines
in oil, NGL or natural gas prices would not only reduce our
revenue, but could reduce the amount of oil, NGL and natural
gas that we can produce economically. Should natural gas, NGL or
oil prices decrease from current levels and remain there for an
extended period of time, we may elect in the future to delay some
of our exploration and development plans for our prospects, or to
cease exploration or development activities on certain prospects
due to the anticipated unfavorable economics from such activities,
and, as a result, we may have to make substantial downward
adjustments to our estimated proved reserves, each of which would
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Our business and
operations may be adversely affected by the recent
COVID-19 or
other similar outbreaks.
As
a result of the recent COVID-19 outbreak or other adverse
public health developments, including voluntary and mandatory
quarantines, travel restrictions and other restrictions, our
operations, and those of our subcontractors, customers and
suppliers, have and may continue to experience delays or
disruptions and temporary suspensions of operations. In addition,
our financial condition and results of operations have been and may
continue to be adversely affected by the coronavirus
outbreak.
The
timeline and potential magnitude of the COVID-19
outbreak is currently unknown. The continuation or
amplification of this virus could continue to more broadly affect
the United States and global economy, including our business and
operations, and the demand for oil and gas. For example, a
significant outbreak of coronavirus or other contagious diseases in
the human population could result in a widespread health crisis
that could adversely affect the economies and financial markets of
many countries, resulting in an economic downturn that could affect
our operating results. In addition, the effects of COVID-19 and
concerns regarding its global spread have recently negatively
impacted the domestic and international demand for crude oil and
natural gas, which has contributed to price volatility, impacted
the price we receive for oil and natural gas and materially and
adversely affected the demand for and marketability of our
production. As the potential impact from COVID-19 is difficult to
predict, the extent to which it may negatively affect our operating
results or the duration of any potential business disruption is
uncertain. Any impact will depend on future developments and new
information that may emerge regarding the severity and duration of
COVID-19 and the actions taken by authorities to contain it or
treat its impact, all of which are beyond our control. These
potential impacts, while uncertain, could adversely affect our
operating results, notwithstanding the fact that the impact of
COVID-19 has already negatively affected our first quarter results
of operations.
Future conditions might require us to make write-downs in our
assets, which would adversely affect our balance sheet and results
of operations.
We
review our long-lived tangible and intangible assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. We also test our
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at
least annually on December 31 of each year, or when events or
changes in the business environment indicate that the carrying
value of a reporting unit may exceed its fair value. If conditions
in any of the businesses in which we compete were to deteriorate,
we could determine that certain of our assets were impaired and we
would then be required to write-off all or a portion of our costs
for such assets. Any such significant write-offs would adversely
affect our balance sheet and results of operations.
Declining general economic, business or industry conditions may
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations,
liquidity and financial condition.
Concerns
over global economic conditions, the threat of pandemic diseases
and the results thereof, energy costs, geopolitical issues,
inflation, the availability and cost of credit, the United States
mortgage market and a declining real estate market in the United
States have contributed to increased economic uncertainty and
diminished expectations for the global economy. These factors,
combined with volatile prices of oil and natural gas, declining
business and consumer confidence and increased unemployment, have
precipitated an economic slowdown and a recession. Concerns about
global economic growth have had a significant adverse impact on
global financial markets and commodity prices. If the economic
climate in the United States or abroad continues to deteriorate,
demand for petroleum products could diminish, which could impact
the price at which we can sell our oil, natural gas and natural gas
liquids, affect the ability of our vendors, suppliers and customers
to continue operations and ultimately adversely impact our results
of operations, liquidity and financial condition.
Our exploration, development and exploitation projects require
substantial capital expenditures that may exceed cash on hand, cash
flows from operations and potential borrowings, and we may be
unable to obtain needed capital on satisfactory terms, which could
adversely affect our future growth.
Our
exploration and development activities are capital intensive. We
make and expect to continue to make substantial capital
expenditures in our business for the development, exploitation,
production and acquisition of oil and natural gas reserves. Our
cash on hand, our operating cash flows and future potential
borrowings may not be adequate to fund our future acquisitions or
future capital expenditure requirements. The rate of our future
growth may be dependent, at least in part, on our ability to access
capital at rates and on terms we determine to be
acceptable.
Our
cash flows from operations and access to capital are subject to a
number of variables, including:
|
●
|
our
estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
amount of oil and natural gas we produce from existing
wells;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
prices at which we sell our production;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
costs of developing and producing our oil and natural gas
reserves;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our
ability to acquire, locate and produce new reserves;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
general state of the economy;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
ability and willingness of banks to lend to us; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our
ability to access the equity and debt capital markets.
|
In
addition, future events, such as terrorist attacks, wars or combat
peace-keeping missions, financial market disruptions, general
economic recessions, oil and natural gas industry recessions, large
company bankruptcies, accounting scandals, pandemic diseases,
overstated reserves estimates by major public oil companies and
disruptions in the financial and capital markets have caused
financial institutions, credit rating agencies and the public to
more closely review the financial statements, capital structures
and earnings of public companies, including energy companies. Such
events have constrained the capital available to the energy
industry in the past, and such events or similar events could
adversely affect our access to funding for our operations in the
future.
If
our revenues decrease as a result of lower oil and natural gas
prices, operating difficulties, declines in reserves or for any
other reason, we may have limited ability to obtain the capital
necessary to sustain our operations at current levels, further
develop and exploit our current properties or invest in additional
exploration opportunities. Alternatively, a significant improvement
in oil and natural gas prices or other factors could result in an
increase in our capital expenditures and we may be required to
alter or increase our capitalization substantially through the
issuance of debt or equity securities, the sale of production
payments, the sale or farm out of interests in our assets, the
borrowing of funds or otherwise to meet any increase in capital
needs. If we are unable to raise additional capital from available
sources at acceptable terms, our business, financial condition and
results of operations could be adversely affected. Further, future
debt financings may require that a portion of our cash flows
provided by operating activities be used for the payment of
principal and interest on our debt, thereby reducing our ability to
use cash flows to fund working capital, capital expenditures and
acquisitions. Debt financing may involve covenants that restrict
our business activities. If we succeed in selling additional equity
securities to raise funds, at such time the ownership percentage of
our existing stockholders would be diluted, and new investors may
demand rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of
existing stockholders. If we choose to farm-out interests in our
prospects, we may lose operating control over such
prospects.
Our oil and natural gas reserves are estimated and may not reflect
the actual volumes of oil and natural gas we will receive, and
significant inaccuracies in these reserve estimates or underlying
assumptions will materially affect the quantities and present value
of our reserves.
The
process of estimating accumulations of oil and natural gas is
complex and is not exact, due to numerous inherent uncertainties.
The process relies on interpretations of available geological,
geophysical, engineering and production data. The extent, quality
and reliability of this technical data can vary. The process also
requires certain economic assumptions related to, among other
things, oil and natural gas prices, drilling and operating
expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and availability of funds.
The accuracy of a reserves estimate is a function of:
|
●
|
the
quality and quantity of available data;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
interpretation of that data;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
judgment of the persons preparing the estimate; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
accuracy of the assumptions.
|
The
accuracy of any estimates of proved reserves generally increases
with the length of the production history. Due to the limited
production history of our properties, the estimates of future
production associated with these properties may be subject to
greater variance to actual production than would be the case with
properties having a longer production history. As our wells produce
over time and more data is available, the estimated proved reserves
will be re-determined on at least an annual basis and may be
adjusted to reflect new information based upon our actual
production history, results of exploration and development,
prevailing oil and natural gas prices and other
factors.
Actual
future production, oil and natural gas prices, revenues, taxes,
development expenditures, operating expenses and quantities of
recoverable oil and natural gas most likely will vary from our
estimates. It is possible that future production declines in our
wells may be greater than we have estimated. Any significant
variance to our estimates could materially affect the quantities
and present value of our reserves.
We may record impairments of oil and gas properties that would
reduce our shareholders’ equity.
The
successful efforts method of accounting is used for oil and gas
exploration and production activities. Under this method, all costs
for development wells, support equipment and facilities, and proved
mineral interests in oil and gas properties are capitalized. We
review the carrying value of our long-lived assets annually or
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
historical cost-carrying value of an asset may no longer be
appropriate. We assess the recoverability of the carrying value of
the asset by estimating the future net undiscounted cash flows
expected to result from the asset, including eventual disposition.
If the future net undiscounted cash flows are less than the
carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss is recorded equal
to the difference between the asset’s carrying value and
estimated fair value. This impairment does not impact cash flows
from operating activities but does reduce earnings and our
shareholders’ equity. The risk that we will be required to
recognize impairments of our oil and gas properties increases
during periods of low oil or gas prices. Impairments would occur if
we were to experience sufficient downward adjustments to our
estimated proved reserves or the present value of estimated future
net revenues. An impairment recognized in one period may not be
reversed in a subsequent period even if higher oil and gas prices
increase the cost center ceiling applicable to the subsequent
period. We have in the past and could in the future incur
additional impairments of oil and gas properties.
We may have accidents, equipment failures or mechanical problems
while drilling or completing wells or in production activities,
which could adversely affect our business.
While
we are drilling and completing wells or involved in production
activities, we may have accidents or experience equipment failures
or mechanical problems in a well that cause us to be unable to
drill and complete the well or to continue to produce the well
according to our plans. We may also damage a potentially
hydrocarbon-bearing formation during drilling and completion
operations. Such incidents may result in a reduction of our
production and reserves from the well or in abandonment of the
well.
Our operations are subject to operational hazards and unforeseen
interruptions for which we may not be adequately
insured.
There
are numerous operational hazards inherent in oil and natural gas
exploration, development, production and gathering,
including:
|
●
|
unusual
or unexpected geologic formations;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
natural
disasters;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
adverse
weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
unanticipated
pressures;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
loss of
drilling fluid circulation;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
blowouts
where oil or natural gas flows uncontrolled at a
wellhead;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
cratering
or collapse of the formation;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
pipe or
cement leaks, failures or casing collapses;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
fires
or explosions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
releases
of hazardous substances or other waste materials that cause
environmental damage;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
pressures
or irregularities in formations; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
equipment
failures or accidents.
|
In
addition, there is an inherent risk of incurring significant
environmental costs and liabilities in the performance of our
operations, some of which may be material, due to our handling of
petroleum hydrocarbons and wastes, our emissions to air and water,
the underground injection or other disposal of our wastes, the use
of hydraulic fracturing fluids and historical industry operations
and waste disposal practices.
Any
of these or other similar occurrences could result in the
disruption or impairment of our operations, substantial repair
costs, personal injury or loss of human life, significant damage to
property, environmental pollution and substantial revenue losses.
The location of our wells, gathering systems, pipelines and other
facilities near populated areas, including residential areas,
commercial business centers and industrial sites, could
significantly increase the level of damages resulting from these
risks. Insurance against all operational risks is not available to
us. We are not fully insured against all risks, including
development and completion risks that are generally not recoverable
from third parties or insurance. In addition, pollution and
environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. We maintain
$2 million general liability coverage and $10 million umbrella
coverage that covers our and our subsidiaries’ business and
operations. With respect to our other non-operated assets, we may
elect not to obtain insurance if we believe that the cost of
available insurance is excessive relative to the perceived risks
presented. Losses could, therefore, occur for uninsurable or
uninsured risks or in amounts in excess of existing insurance
coverage. Moreover, insurance may not be available in the future at
commercially reasonable prices or on commercially reasonable terms.
Changes in the insurance markets due to various factors may make it
more difficult for us to obtain certain types of coverage in the
future. As a result, we may not be able to obtain the levels or
types of insurance we would otherwise have obtained prior to these
market changes, and the insurance coverage we do obtain may not
cover certain hazards or all potential losses that are currently
covered, and may be subject to large deductibles. Losses and
liabilities from uninsured and underinsured events and delay in the
payment of insurance proceeds could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The threat and impact of terrorist attacks, cyber-attacks or
similar hostilities may adversely impact our
operations.
We
cannot assess the extent of either the threat or the potential
impact of future terrorist attacks on the energy industry in
general, and on us in particular, either in the short-term or in
the long-term. Uncertainty surrounding such hostilities may affect
our operations in unpredictable ways, including the possibility
that infrastructure facilities, including pipelines and gathering
systems, production facilities, processing plants and refineries,
could be targets of, or indirect casualties of, an act of terror, a
cyber-attack or electronic security breach, or an act of
war.
Failure to adequately protect critical data and technology systems
could materially affect our operations.
Information
technology solution failures, network disruptions and breaches of
data security could disrupt our operations by causing delays or
cancellation of customer orders, impeding processing of
transactions and reporting financial results, resulting in the
unintentional disclosure of customer, employee or our information,
or damage to our reputation. There can be no assurance that a
system failure or data security breach will not have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows.
Our strategy as an onshore resource player may result in operations
concentrated in certain geographic areas and may increase our
exposure to many of the risks described in this Annual
Report.
Our
current operations are concentrated in the states of New
Mexico and Colorado. This concentration may increase the potential
impact of many of the risks described in this Annual Report. For
example, we may have greater exposure to regulatory actions
impacting New Mexico and/or Colorado, natural disasters in New
Mexico and/or Colorado, competition for equipment, services and
materials available in, and access to infrastructure and markets
in, these states.
Unless we replace our oil and natural gas reserves, our reserves
and production will decline, which will adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The
rate of production from our oil and natural gas properties will
decline as our reserves are depleted. Our future oil and natural
gas reserves and production and, therefore, our income and cash
flow, are highly dependent on our success in (a) efficiently
developing and exploiting our current reserves on properties owned
by us or by other persons or entities and (b) economically
finding or acquiring additional oil and natural gas producing
properties. In the future, we may have difficulty acquiring new
properties. During periods of low oil and/or natural gas prices, it
will become more difficult to raise the capital necessary to
finance expansion activities. If we are unable to replace our
production, our reserves will decrease, and our business, financial
condition and results of operations would be adversely
affected.
Our strategy includes acquisitions of oil and natural gas
properties, and our failure to identify or complete future
acquisitions successfully, or not produce projected revenues
associated with the future acquisitions could reduce our earnings
and hamper our growth.
We
may be unable to identify properties for acquisition or to make
acquisitions on terms that we consider economically acceptable.
There is intense competition for acquisition opportunities in our
industry. Competition for acquisitions may increase the cost of, or
cause us to refrain from, completing acquisitions. The completion
and pursuit of acquisitions may be dependent upon, among other
things, our ability to obtain debt and equity financing and, in
some cases, regulatory approvals. Our ability to grow through
acquisitions will require us to continue to invest in operations,
financial and management information systems and to attract,
retain, motivate and effectively manage our employees. The
inability to manage the integration of acquisitions effectively
could reduce our focus on subsequent acquisitions and current
operations, and could negatively impact our results of operations
and growth potential. Our financial position and results of
operations may fluctuate significantly from period to period as a
result of the completion of significant acquisitions during
particular periods. If we are not successful in identifying or
acquiring any material property interests, our earnings could be
reduced and our growth could be restricted.
We
may engage in bidding and negotiating to complete successful
acquisitions. We may be required to alter or increase substantially
our capitalization to finance these acquisitions through the use of
cash on hand, the issuance of debt or equity securities, the sale
of production payments, the sale of non-strategic assets, the
borrowing of funds or otherwise. If we were to proceed with one or
more acquisitions involving the issuance of our common stock, our
stockholders would suffer dilution of their interests. Furthermore,
our decision to acquire properties that are substantially different
in operating or geologic characteristics or geographic locations
from areas with which our staff is familiar may impact our
productivity in such areas.
We
may not be able to produce the projected revenues related to future
acquisitions. There are many assumptions related to the projection
of the revenues of future acquisitions including, but not limited
to, drilling success, oil and natural gas prices, production
decline curves and other data. If revenues from future acquisitions
do not meet projections, this could adversely affect our business
and financial condition.
If we complete acquisitions or enter into business combinations in
the future, they may disrupt or have a negative impact on our
business.
If
we complete acquisitions or enter into business combinations in the
future, funding permitting, we could have difficulty integrating
the acquired companies’ assets, personnel and operations with
our own. Additionally, acquisitions, mergers or business
combinations we may enter into in the future could result in a
change of control of the Company, and a change in the board of
directors or officers of the Company. In addition, the key
personnel of the acquired business may not be willing to work for
us. We cannot predict the effect expansion may have on our core
business. Regardless of whether we are successful in making an
acquisition or completing a business combination, the negotiations
could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and
employees and increase our expenses. In addition to the risks
described above, acquisitions and business combinations are
accompanied by a number of inherent risks, including, without
limitation, the following:
|
●
|
the
difficulty of integrating acquired companies, concepts and
operations;
|
|
●
|
the
potential disruption of the ongoing businesses and distraction of
our management and the management of acquired
companies;
|
|
●
|
change
in our business focus and/or management;
|
|
●
|
difficulties
in maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures and
policies;
|
|
●
|
the
potential impairment of relationships with employees and partners
as a result of any integration of new management
personnel;
|
|
●
|
the
potential inability to manage an increased number of locations and
employees;
|
|
●
|
our
ability to successfully manage the companies and/or concepts
acquired;
|
|
●
|
the
failure to realize efficiencies, synergies and cost savings;
or
|
|
●
|
the
effect of any government regulations which relate to the business
acquired.
|
Our
business could be severely impaired if and to the extent that we
are unable to succeed in addressing any of these risks or other
problems encountered in connection with an acquisition or business
combination, many of which cannot be presently identified. These
risks and problems could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our
management and employees, increase our expenses and adversely
affect our results of operations.
Any
acquisition or business combination transaction we enter into in
the future could cause substantial dilution to existing
stockholders, result in one party having majority or significant
control over the Company or result in a change in business focus of
the Company.
We may incur indebtedness which could reduce our financial
flexibility, increase interest expense and adversely impact our
operations and our unit costs.
We
currently have no outstanding indebtedness, but we may incur
significant amounts of indebtedness in the future in order to make
acquisitions or to develop our properties. Our level of
indebtedness could affect our operations in several ways, including
the following:
|
●
|
a
significant portion of our cash flows could be used to service our
indebtedness;
|
|
●
|
a high
level of debt would increase our vulnerability to general adverse
economic and industry conditions;
|
|
●
|
any
covenants contained in the agreements governing our outstanding
indebtedness could limit our ability to borrow additional
funds;
|
|
●
|
dispose
of assets, pay dividends and make certain investments;
|
|
●
|
a high
level of debt may place us at a competitive disadvantage compared
to our competitors that are less leveraged and, therefore, may be
able to take advantage of opportunities that our indebtedness may
prevent us from pursuing; and
|
|
●
|
debt
covenants to which we may agree may affect our flexibility in
planning for, and reacting to, changes in the economy and in our
industry.
|
A
high level of indebtedness increases the risk that we may default
on our debt obligations. We may not be able to generate sufficient
cash flows to pay the principal or interest on our debt, and future
working capital, borrowings or equity financing may not be
available to pay or refinance such debt. If we do not have
sufficient funds and are otherwise unable to arrange financing, we
may have to sell significant assets or have a portion of our assets
foreclosed upon which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We may purchase oil and natural gas properties with liabilities or
risks that we did not know about or that we did not assess
correctly, and, as a result, we could be subject to liabilities
that could adversely affect our results of operations.
Before
acquiring oil and natural gas properties, we estimate the reserves,
future oil and natural gas prices, operating costs, potential
environmental liabilities and other factors relating to the
properties. However, our review involves many assumptions and
estimates, and their accuracy is inherently uncertain. As a result,
we may not discover all existing or potential problems associated
with the properties we buy. We may not become sufficiently familiar
with the properties to assess fully their deficiencies and
capabilities. We do not generally perform inspections on every well
or property, and we may not be able to observe mechanical and
environmental problems even when we conduct an inspection. The
seller may not be willing or financially able to give us
contractual protection against any identified problems, and we may
decide to assume environmental and other liabilities in connection
with properties we acquire. If we acquire properties with risks or
liabilities we did not know about or that we did not assess
correctly, our business, financial condition and results of
operations could be adversely affected as we settle claims and
incur cleanup costs related to these liabilities.
We may incur losses or costs as a result of title deficiencies in
the properties in which we invest.
If
an examination of the title history of a property that we have
purchased reveals an oil and natural gas lease has been purchased
in error from a person who is not the owner of the property, our
interest would be worthless. In such an instance, the amount paid
for such oil and natural gas lease as well as any royalties paid
pursuant to the terms of the lease prior to the discovery of the
title defect would be lost.
Prior
to the drilling of an oil and natural gas well, it is the normal
practice in the oil and natural gas industry for the person or
company acting as the operator of the well to obtain a preliminary
title review of the spacing unit within which the proposed oil and
natural gas well is to be drilled to ensure there are no obvious
deficiencies in title to the well. Frequently, as a result of such
examinations, certain curative work must be done to correct
deficiencies in the marketability of the title, and such curative
work entails expense. Our failure to cure any title defects may
adversely impact our ability in the future to increase production
and reserves. In the future, we may suffer a monetary loss from
title defects or title failure. Additionally, unproved and
unevaluated acreage has greater risk of title defects than
developed acreage. If there are any title defects or defects in
assignment of leasehold rights in properties in which we hold an
interest, we will suffer a financial loss which could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our identified drilling locations are scheduled over several years,
making them susceptible to uncertainties that could materially
alter the occurrence or timing of their drilling.
Our
management team has identified and scheduled drilling locations in
our operating areas over a multi-year period. Our ability to drill
and develop these locations depends on a number of factors,
including the availability of equipment and capital, approval by
regulators, seasonal conditions, oil and natural gas prices,
assessment of risks, costs and drilling results. The final
determination on whether to drill any of these locations will be
dependent upon the factors described elsewhere in this Annual
Report and the documents incorporated by reference herein, as well
as, to some degree, the results of our drilling activities with
respect to our established drilling locations. Because of these
uncertainties, we do not know if the drilling locations we have
identified will be drilled within our expected timeframe or at all
or if we will be able to economically produce hydrocarbons from
these or any other potential drilling locations. Our actual
drilling activities may be materially different from our current
expectations, which could adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Potential conflicts of interest could arise for certain members of
our management team and board of directors that hold management
positions with other entities and our largest
stockholder.
Dr. Simon Kukes, our Chief Executive Officer and
member of our board of directors, J. Douglas Schick, our President,
and Clark R. Moore, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary, hold various other management positions with
privately-held companies, some of which are involved in the oil and
gas industry, and Dr. Simon Kukes is the principal of SK Energy
LLC, the Company’s largest stockholder. Dr. Kukes also
beneficially owns 74.5% of our voting securities. We believe these
positions require only an immaterial amount of each officers’
time and will not conflict with their roles or responsibilities
with our company. If any of these companies enter into one or
more transactions with our company, or if the officers’
position with any such company requires significantly more time
than currently anticipated, potential conflicts of
interests could arise from the officers performing services for us
and these other entities.
We currently license only a limited amount of seismic and other
geological data and may have difficulty obtaining additional data
at a reasonable cost, which could adversely affect our future results of operations.
We
currently license only a limited amount of seismic and other
geological data to assist us in exploration and development
activities. We may obtain access to additional data in our areas of
interest through licensing arrangements with companies that own or
have access to that data or by paying to obtain that data directly.
Seismic and geological data can be expensive to license or obtain.
We may not be able to license or obtain such data at an acceptable
cost. In addition, even when properly interpreted, seismic
data and visualization techniques are not conclusive in determining
if hydrocarbons are present in economically producible amounts and
seismic indications of hydrocarbon saturation are generally not
reliable indicators of productive reservoir rock.
The unavailability or high cost of drilling rigs, completion
equipment and services, supplies and personnel, including hydraulic
fracturing equipment and personnel, could adversely affect our
ability to establish and execute exploration and development plans
within budget and on a timely basis, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Shortages
or the high cost of drilling rigs, completion equipment and
services, supplies or personnel could delay or adversely affect our
operations. When drilling activity in the United States increases,
associated costs typically also increase, including those costs
related to drilling rigs, equipment, supplies and personnel and the
services and products of other vendors to the industry. These costs
may increase, and necessary equipment and services may become
unavailable to us at economical prices. Should this increase in
costs occur, we may delay drilling activities, which may limit our
ability to establish and replace reserves, or we may incur these
higher costs, which may negatively affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
In
addition, the demand for hydraulic fracturing services currently
exceeds the availability of fracturing equipment and crews across
the industry and in our operating areas in particular. The
accelerated wear and tear of hydraulic fracturing equipment due to
its deployment in unconventional oil and natural gas fields
characterized by longer lateral lengths and larger numbers of
fracturing stages has further amplified this equipment and crew
shortage. If demand for fracturing services increases or the supply
of fracturing equipment and crews decreases, then higher costs
could result and could adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We have limited control over activities on properties we do not
operate.
We
are not the operator on some of our properties located in our D-J
Basin Asset, and, as a result, our ability to exercise influence
over the operations of these properties or their associated costs
is limited. Our dependence on the operators and other working
interest owners of these projects and our limited ability to
influence operations and associated costs or control the risks
could materially and adversely affect the realization of our
targeted returns on capital in drilling or acquisition activities.
The success and timing of our drilling and development activities
on properties operated by others therefore depends upon a number of
factors, including:
|
●
|
timing
and amount of capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
operator’s expertise and financial resources;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
rate of production of reserves, if any;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
approval
of other participants in drilling wells; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
selection
of technology.
|
The marketability of our production is dependent upon oil and
natural gas gathering and transportation facilities owned and
operated by third parties, and the unavailability of satisfactory
oil and natural gas transportation arrangements would have a
material adverse effect on our revenue.
The
unavailability of satisfactory oil and natural gas transportation
arrangements may hinder our access to oil and natural gas markets
or delay production from our wells. The availability of a ready
market for our oil and natural gas production depends on a number
of factors, including the demand for, and supply of, oil and
natural gas and the proximity of reserves to pipelines and terminal
facilities. Our ability to market our production depends in
substantial part on the availability and capacity of gathering
systems, pipelines and processing facilities owned and operated by
third parties. Our failure to obtain these services on acceptable
terms could materially harm our business. We may be required to
shut-in wells for lack of a market or because of inadequacy or
unavailability of pipeline or gathering system capacity. If that
were to occur, we would be unable to realize revenue from those
wells until production arrangements were made to deliver our
production to market. Furthermore, if we were required to shut-in
wells we might also be obligated to pay shut-in royalties to
certain mineral interest owners in order to maintain our leases. We
do not expect to purchase firm transportation capacity on
third-party facilities. Therefore, we expect the transportation of
our production to be generally interruptible in nature and lower in
priority to those having firm transportation
arrangements.
The
disruption of third-party facilities due to maintenance and/or
weather could negatively impact our ability to market and deliver
our products. The third parties' control when or if such facilities
are restored and what prices will be charged. Federal and state
regulation of oil and natural gas production and transportation,
tax and energy policies, changes in supply and demand, pipeline
pressures, damage to or destruction of pipelines and general
economic conditions could adversely affect our ability to produce,
gather and transport oil and natural gas.
An increase in the differential between the NYMEX or other
benchmark prices of oil and natural gas and the wellhead price we
receive for our production could adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
The
prices that we will receive for our oil and natural gas production
sometimes may reflect a discount to the relevant benchmark prices,
such as the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), that are used for
calculating hedge positions. The difference between the benchmark
price and the prices we receive is called a differential. Increases
in the differential between the benchmark prices for oil and
natural gas and the wellhead price we receive could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We do not have, and may not have in the future, any derivative
contracts or hedging covering the amount of the basis differentials
we experience in respect of our production. As such, we will be
exposed to any increase in such differentials.
We may have difficulty managing growth in our business, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations and our ability to execute our business
plan in a timely fashion.
Because
of our small size, growth in accordance with our business plans, if
achieved, will place a significant strain on our financial,
technical, operational and management resources. As we expand our
activities, including our planned increase in oil exploration,
development and production, and increase the number of projects we
are evaluating or in which we participate, there will be additional
demands on our financial, technical and management resources. The
failure to continue to upgrade our technical, administrative,
operating and financial control systems or the occurrence of
unexpected expansion difficulties, including the inability to
recruit and retain experienced managers, geoscientists, petroleum
engineers and landmen could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations and our
ability to execute our business plan in a timely
fashion.
Financial difficulties encountered by our oil and natural gas
purchasers, third-party operators or other third parties could
decrease our cash flow from operations and adversely affect the
exploration and development of our prospects and
assets.
We
derive and will derive in the future, substantially all of our
revenues from the sale of our oil and natural gas to unaffiliated
third-party purchasers, independent marketing companies and
mid-stream companies. Any delays in payments from our purchasers
caused by financial problems encountered by them will have an
immediate negative effect on our results of
operations.
Liquidity
and cash flow problems encountered by our working interest
co-owners or the third-party operators of our non-operated
properties may prevent or delay the drilling of a well or the
development of a project. Our working interest co-owners may be
unwilling or unable to pay their share of the costs of projects as
they become due. In the case of a farmout party, we would have to
find a new farmout party or obtain alternative funding in order to
complete the exploration and development of the prospects subject
to a farmout agreement. In the case of a working interest owner, we
could be required to pay the working interest owner’s share
of the project costs. We cannot assure you that we would be able to
obtain the capital necessary to fund either of these contingencies
or that we would be able to find a new farmout party.
The calculated present value of future net revenues from our proved
reserves will not necessarily be the same as the current market
value of our estimated oil and natural gas reserves.
You
should not assume that the present value of future net cash flows
as included in our public filings is the current market value of
our estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves. We generally
base the estimated discounted future net cash flows from proved
reserves on current costs held constant over time without
escalation and on commodity prices using an unweighted arithmetic
average of first-day-of-the-month index prices, appropriately
adjusted, for the 12-month period immediately preceding the date of
the estimate. Actual future prices and costs may be materially
higher or lower than the prices and costs used for these estimates
and will be affected by factors such as:
|
●
|
actual
prices we receive for oil and natural gas;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
actual
cost and timing of development and production
expenditures;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
amount and timing of actual production; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
changes
in governmental regulations or taxation.
|
In addition, the 10% discount factor that is
required to be used to calculate discounted future net revenues for
reporting purposes under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(“GAAP”) is
not necessarily the most appropriate discount factor based on the
cost of capital in effect from time to time and risks associated
with our business and the oil and natural gas industry in
general.
Competition in the oil and natural gas industry is intense, making
it difficult for us to acquire properties, market oil and natural
gas and secure trained personnel.
Our
ability to acquire additional prospects and to find and develop
reserves in the future will depend on our ability to evaluate and
select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a
highly competitive environment for acquiring properties, marketing
oil and natural gas and securing trained personnel. Also, there is
substantial competition for capital available for investment in the
oil and natural gas industry. Many of our competitors possess and
employ financial, technical and personnel resources substantially
greater than ours, and many of our competitors have more
established presences in the United States than we have. Those
companies may be able to pay more for productive oil and natural
gas properties and exploratory prospects and to evaluate, bid for
and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our
financial or personnel resources permit. In addition, other
companies may be able to offer better compensation packages to
attract and retain qualified personnel than we are able to offer.
The cost to attract and retain qualified personnel has increased in
recent years due to competition and may increase substantially in
the future. We may not be able to compete successfully in the
future in acquiring prospective reserves, developing reserves,
marketing hydrocarbons, attracting and retaining quality personnel
and raising additional capital, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our competitors may use superior technology and data resources that
we may be unable to afford or that would require a costly
investment by us in order to compete with them more
effectively.
Our
industry is subject to rapid and significant advancements in
technology, including the introduction of new products and services
using new technologies and databases. As our competitors use or
develop new technologies, we may be placed at a competitive
disadvantage, and competitive pressures may force us to implement
new technologies at a substantial cost. In addition, many of our
competitors will have greater financial, technical and personnel
resources that allow them to enjoy technological advantages and may
in the future allow them to implement new technologies before we
can. We cannot be certain that we will be able to implement
technologies on a timely basis or at a cost that is acceptable to
us. One or more of the technologies that we will use or that we may
implement in the future may become obsolete, and we may be
adversely affected.
If we do not hedge our exposure to reductions in oil and natural
gas prices, we may be subject to significant reductions in prices.
Alternatively, we may use oil and natural gas price hedging
contracts, which involve credit risk and may limit future revenues
from price increases and result in significant fluctuations in our
profitability.
In
the event that we continue to choose not to hedge our exposure to
reductions in oil and natural gas prices by purchasing futures
and/or by using other hedging strategies, we may be subject to a
significant reduction in prices which could have a material
negative impact on our profitability. Alternatively, we may elect
to use hedging transactions with respect to a portion of our oil
and natural gas production to achieve more predictable cash flow
and to reduce our exposure to price fluctuations. While the use of
hedging transactions limits the downside risk of price declines,
their use also may limit future revenues from price increases.
Hedging transactions also involve the risk that the counterparty
may be unable to satisfy its obligations.
Changes in the legal and regulatory environment governing the oil
and natural gas industry, particularly changes in the current
Colorado forced pooling system and salt water disposal permitting
regulations in New Mexico, could have a material adverse effect on
our business.
Our business is subject to various forms of
government regulation, including laws and regulations concerning
the location, spacing and permitting of the oil and natural gas
wells we drill, among other matters. In particular, our business in
the D-J Basin of Colorado utilizes a methodology available in
Colorado known as “forced
pooling,” which refers to
the ability of a holder of an oil and natural gas interest in a
particular prospective drilling spacing unit to apply to the
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission for an order forcing
all other holders of oil and natural gas interests in such area
into a common pool for purposes of developing that drilling spacing
unit. In addition, our Permian Basin operations require significant
salt water disposal capacity, with the permitting of necessary salt
water disposal wells being regulated by the New Mexico State Land
Office. In recent months, we have encountered significant delays in
receiving such permits, and increasing difficulty in obtaining
required permits, from the New Mexico State Land Office, which has
delayed completion operations and the bringing of new wells on to
full production. Changes in the legal and regulatory environment
governing our industry, particularly any changes to
Colorado’s forced pooling procedures that make forced pooling
more difficult to accomplish, or increased regulation in New Mexico
with respect to salt water disposal well permitting, could result
in increased compliance costs and operational delays, and adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
In the event that local or state restrictions or prohibitions are
adopted in areas where we conduct operations, that impose more
stringent limitations on the production and development of oil and
natural gas, including, among other things, the development of
increased setback distances, we and similarly situated oil and
natural exploration and production operators in the state may incur
significant costs to comply with such requirements or may
experience delays or curtailment in the pursuit of exploration,
development, or production activities, and possibly be limited or
precluded in the drilling of wells or in the amounts that we and
similarly situated operates are ultimately able to produce from our
reserves. Any such increased costs, delays, cessations,
restrictions or prohibitions could have a material adverse effect
on our business, prospects, results of operations, financial
condition, and liquidity. If new or more stringent federal, state
or local legal restrictions relating to the hydraulic fracturing
process are adopted in areas where we operate, including, for
example, on federal and American Indian lands, we could incur
potentially significant added cost to comply with such
requirements, experience delays or curtailment in the pursuit of
exploration, development or production activities, and perhaps even
be precluded from drilling wells.
SEC rules could limit our ability to
book additional proved undeveloped reserves
(“PUDs”) in
the future.
SEC
rules require that, subject to limited exceptions, PUDs may only be
booked if they relate to wells scheduled to be drilled within five
years after the date of booking. This requirement has limited and
may continue to limit our ability to book additional PUDs as we
pursue our drilling program. Moreover, we may be required to write
down our PUDs if we do not drill or plan on delaying those wells
within the required five-year timeframe.
New or amended environmental legislation or regulatory initiatives
could result in increased costs, additional operating restrictions,
or delays, or have other adverse effects on us.
The environmental laws and regulations to which we are subject
change frequently, often to become more burdensome and/or to
increase the risk that we will be subject to significant
liabilities. New or amended federal, state, or local laws or
implementing regulations or orders imposing new environmental
obligations on, or otherwise limiting, our operations could make it
more difficult and more expensive to complete oil and natural gas
wells, increase our costs of compliance and doing business, delay
or prevent the development of resources (especially from shale
formations that are not commercial without the use of hydraulic
fracturing), or alter the demand for and consumption of our
products. Any such outcome could have a material and adverse impact
on our cash flows and results of operations.
For example, in 2014,
2016 and 2018, opponents of hydraulic fracturing sought statewide
ballot initiatives in Colorado that would have restricted oil and
gas development in Colorado and could have had materially adverse
impacts on us. One of the proposed initiatives would have made the
vast majority of the surface area of the state ineligible for
drilling, including substantially all of our planned future
drilling locations. By further example, in April 2019, Colorado
Senate Bill 19-181 (the “Bill”) was
passed into law, which prioritizes the protection of public safety,
health, welfare, and the environment in the regulation of the oil
and gas industry by modifying the State’s oil and gas
statutes and clarifying, reinforcing, and establishing local
governments’ regulatory authority over the surface impacts of
oil and gas development in Colorado. This Bill, among other things,
gives more power to local government entities in making land use
decisions about oil and gas development and regulation, and directs
the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission
(“COGCC”) to
promulgate rules to ensure, among other things, proper wellbore
integrity, allow public disclosure of flowline information, and
evaluate when inactive or shut-in wells must be inspected before
being put into production or used for injection. In addition, the
Bill requires that owners of more than 50% of the mineral interests
in lands to be pooled must have joined in the application for a
pooling order and that the application must include proof that the
applicant received approval for the facilities from the affected
local government or that the affected local government does not
regulate such facilities. In addition, the Bill provides that an
operator cannot use the surface owned by a nonconsenting owner
without permission from the nonconsenting owner, and increases
nonconsenting owners’ royalty rates during a well’s
pay-back period from 12.5% to 13.0%. Pursuant to the
Bill, in December 2019 the COGCC proposed new regulatory
requirements to enhance safety and environmental protection during
hydraulic fracturing and to enhance wellbore
integrity. We anticipate that
the Bill may make it more difficult and more costly for us to
undertake oil and gas development activities in
Colorado.
Similar to the Bill
described above, proposals are made from time to time to adopt new,
or amend existing, laws and regulations to address hydraulic
fracturing or climate change concerns through further regulation of
exploration and development activities. Please read “Part I”
– “Item 1. Business” — “Regulation of
the Oil and Gas Industry” and “Regulation of
Environmental and Occupational Safety and Health Matters” for
a further description of the laws and regulations that affect
us. We
cannot predict the nature, outcome, or effect on us of future
regulatory initiatives, but such initiatives could materially
impact our results of operations, production, reserves, and other
aspects of our business.
For
example, in 2019, the EPA increased the state of Colorado’s
non-attainment ozone classification for the Denver Metro/North
Front Range NAA area from “moderate” to
“serious” under the 2008 NAAQS. This
“serious” classification will trigger significant
additional obligations for the state under the CAA and could result
in new and more stringent air quality control requirements, which
may in turn result in significant costs, and delays in obtaining
necessary permits applicable to our operations.
Proposed changes to U.S. tax laws, if adopted, could have an
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows.
From time to time, legislative proposals are made that would, if
enacted, result in the elimination of the immediate deduction for
intangible drilling and development costs, the elimination of the
deduction from income for domestic production activities relating
to oil and gas exploration and development, the repeal of the
percentage depletion allowance for oil and gas properties, and an
extension of the amortization period for certain geological and
geophysical expenditures. Such changes, if adopted, or other
similar changes that reduce or eliminate deductions currently
available with respect to oil and gas exploration and development,
could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results
of operations, and cash flows.
We may incur substantial costs to comply with the various federal,
state, and local laws and regulations that affect our oil and
natural gas operations, including as a result of the actions of
third parties.
We are affected
significantly by a substantial number of governmental regulations
relating to, among other things, the release or disposal of
materials into the environment, health and safety, land use, and
other matters. A summary of the principal environmental rules and
regulations to which we are currently subject is set forth
in “Part I”
– “Item 1. Business” — “Regulation of
the Oil and Gas Industry” and “Regulation of
Environmental and Occupational Safety and Health Matters”.
Compliance
with such laws and regulations often increases our cost of doing
business and thereby decreases our profitability. Failure to comply
with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of
administrative, civil, and criminal penalties, the incurrence of
investigatory or remedial obligations, or the issuance of cease and
desist orders.
The environmental laws and regulations to which we are subject may,
among other things:
●
require us to apply for and receive a permit before drilling
commences or certain associated facilities are
developed;
●
restrict the types, quantities, and concentrations of substances
that can be released into the environment in connection with
drilling, hydraulic fracturing, and production
activities;
●
limit or prohibit
drilling activities on certain lands lying within wilderness,
wetlands and other “waters
of the United States,” threatened and
endangered species habitat, and other protected
areas;
●
require remedial measures to mitigate pollution from former
operations, such as plugging abandoned wells;
●
require us to add procedures and/or staff in order to comply with
applicable laws and regulations; and
●
impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from our
operations.
In addition, we could
face liability under applicable environmental laws and regulations
as a result of the activities of previous owners of our properties
or other third parties. For example, over the years, we have owned
or leased numerous properties for oil and natural gas activities
upon which petroleum hydrocarbons or other materials may have been
released by us or by predecessor property owners or lessees who
were not under our control. Under applicable environmental laws and
regulations, including The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act - otherwise known as CERCLA or
Superfund, The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(“RCRA”),
and state laws, we could be held liable for the removal or
remediation of previously released materials or property
contamination at such locations, or at third-party locations to
which we have sent waste, regardless of our fault, whether we were
responsible for the release or whether the operations at the time
of the release were lawful.
Compliance with, or liabilities associated with violations of or
remediation obligations under, environmental laws and regulations
could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations
and financial condition.
Part of our strategy involves drilling in existing or emerging oil
and gas plays using some of the latest available horizontal
drilling and completion techniques. The results of our planned
exploratory drilling in these plays are subject to drilling and
completion technique risks, and drilling results may not meet our
expectations for reserves or production. As a result, we may incur
material write-downs and the value of our undeveloped acreage could
decline if drilling results are unsuccessful.
Our
operations in the Permian Basin in Chaves and Roosevelt Counties,
New Mexico, and the D-J Basin in Weld and Morgan Counties,
Colorado, involve utilizing the latest drilling and completion
techniques in order to maximize cumulative recoveries and therefore
generate the highest possible returns. Risks that we may face while
drilling include, but are not limited to, landing our well bore in
the desired drilling zone, staying in the desired drilling zone
while drilling horizontally through the formation, running our
casing the entire length of the well bore and being able to run
tools and other equipment consistently through the horizontal well
bore. Risks that we may face while completing our wells include,
but are not limited to, being able to fracture stimulate the
planned number of stages, being able to run tools the entire length
of the well bore during completion operations and successfully
cleaning out the well bore after completion of the final fracture
stimulation stage.
The
results of our drilling in new or emerging formations will be more
uncertain initially than drilling results in areas that are more
developed and have a longer history of established production.
Newer or emerging formations and areas have limited or no
production history and consequently we are less able to predict
future drilling results in these areas.
Ultimately,
the success of these drilling and completion techniques can only be
evaluated over time as more wells are drilled and production
profiles are established over a sufficiently long time period. If
our drilling results are less than anticipated or we are unable to
execute our drilling program because of capital constraints, lease
expirations, access to gathering systems and limited takeaway
capacity or otherwise, and/or natural gas and oil prices decline,
the return on our investment in these areas may not be as
attractive as we anticipate. Further, as a result of any of these
developments we could incur material write-downs of our oil and
natural gas properties and the value of our undeveloped acreage
could decline in the future.
Part of our strategy involves using some of the latest available
horizontal drilling and completion techniques. The results of our
drilling in these plays are subject to drilling and completion
technique risks, and results may not meet our expectations for
reserves or production.
Many
of our operations involve, and are planned to utilize, the latest
drilling and completion techniques as developed by us and our
service providers in order to maximize production and ultimate
recoveries and therefore generate the highest possible returns.
Risks we face while completing our wells include, but are not
limited to, the inability to fracture stimulate the planned number
of stages, the inability to run tools and other equipment the
entire length of the well bore during completion operations, the
inability to recover such tools and other equipment, and the
inability to successfully clean out the well bore after completion
of the final fracture stimulation. Ultimately, the success of these
drilling and completion techniques can only be evaluated over time
as more wells are drilled and production profiles are established
over a sufficiently long time period. If our drilling results are
less than anticipated or we are unable to execute our drilling
program because of capital constraints, lease expirations, limited
access to gathering systems and takeaway capacity, and/or prices
for crude oil, natural gas, and NGLs decline, then the return on
our investment for a particular project may not be as attractive as
we anticipated and we could incur material write-downs of oil and
gas properties and the value of our undeveloped acreage could
decline in the future.
Uncertainties associated with enhanced recovery methods may result
in us not realizing an acceptable return on our investments in such
projects.
Production
and reserves, if any, attributable to the use of enhanced recovery
methods are inherently difficult to predict. If our enhanced
recovery methods do not allow for the extraction of crude oil,
natural gas, and associated liquids in a manner or to the extent
that we anticipate, we may not realize an acceptable return on our
investments in such projects. In addition, as proposed legislation
and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing become
law, the cost of some of these enhanced recovery methods could
increase substantially.
A significant amount of our Permian Basin Asset acreage must be
drilled pursuant to governing agreements and leases, in order to
hold the acreage by production. In the highly competitive market
for acreage, failure to drill sufficient wells in order to hold
acreage will result in a substantial lease renewal cost, or if
renewal is not feasible, loss of our lease and prospective drilling
opportunities.
Currently
31,813 acres of our Permian Basin Asset are held by production and
not subject to lease expiration, with 8,835 acres subject to lease
or governing agreement expiration if these acres are not developed
by us prior to expiration. The loss of substantial leases could
have a material adverse effect on our assets, operations, revenues
and cash flow and could cause the value of our securities to
decline in value.
Competition for hydraulic fracturing services and water
disposal could impede our ability to develop our oil and gas
plays.
The
unavailability or high cost of high pressure pumping services (or
hydraulic fracturing services), chemicals, proppant, water and
water disposal and related services and equipment could limit our
ability to execute our exploration and development plans on a
timely basis and within our budget. The oil and natural gas
industry is experiencing a growing emphasis on the exploitation and
development of shale natural gas and shale oil resource plays,
which are dependent on hydraulic fracturing for economically
successful development. Hydraulic fracturing in oil and gas plays
requires high pressure pumping service crews. A shortage of service
crews or proppant, chemical, water or water disposal options,
especially if this shortage occurred in eastern New Mexico or
eastern Colorado, could materially and adversely affect our
operations and the timeliness of executing our development plans
within our budget.
Regulations could adversely affect our ability to hedge risks
associated with our business and our operating results and cash
flows.
Rules adopted by federal regulators establishing
federal regulation of the over-the-counter
(“OTC”) derivatives market and entities that
participate in that market may adversely affect our ability to
manage certain of our risks on a cost effective basis. Such laws
and regulations may also adversely affect our ability to execute
our strategies with respect to hedging our exposure to variability
in expected future cash flows attributable to the future sale of
our oil and gas.
We
expect that our potential future hedging activities will remain
subject to significant and developing regulations and regulatory
oversight. However, the full impact of the various U.S. regulatory
developments in connection with these activities will not be known
with certainty until such derivatives market regulations are fully
implemented and related market practices and structures are fully
developed.
Our
operations are substantially dependent on the availability of
water. Restrictions on our ability to obtain water may have an
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows.
Water is an essential component of shale oil and natural gas
production during both the drilling and hydraulic fracturing
processes. Historically, we have been able to purchase water from
local land owners for use in our operations. When drought
conditions occur, governmental authorities may restrict the use of
water subject to their jurisdiction for hydraulic fracturing to
protect local water supplies. Both New Mexico and Colorado have
relatively arid climates and experience drought conditions from
time to time. If we are unable to obtain water to use in our
operations from local sources or dispose of or recycle water used
in operations, or if the price of water or water disposal increases
significantly, we may be unable to produce oil and natural gas
economically, which could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations, and cash
flows.
Downturns and volatility in global economies and commodity and
credit markets could materially adversely affect our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Our
results of operations are materially affected by the conditions of
the global economies and the credit, commodities and stock markets.
Among other things, we may be adversely impacted if consumers of
oil and gas are not able to access sufficient capital to continue
to operate their businesses or to operate them at prior levels. A
decline in consumer confidence or changing patterns in the
availability and use of disposable income by consumers can
negatively affect the demand for oil and gas and as a result our
results of operations.
Improvements in or new discoveries of alternative energy
technologies could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Because
our operations depend on the demand for oil and used oil, any
improvement in or new discoveries of alternative energy
technologies (such as wind, solar, geothermal, fuel cells and
biofuels) that increase the use of alternative forms of energy
and reduce the demand for oil, gas and oil and gas related products
could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Competition due to advances in renewable fuels may lessen the
demand for our products and negatively impact our
profitability.
Alternatives
to petroleum-based products and production methods are continually
under development. For example, a number of automotive, industrial
and power generation manufacturers are developing alternative clean
power systems using fuel cells or clean-burning gaseous fuels that
may address increasing worldwide energy costs, the long-term
availability of petroleum reserves and environmental concerns,
which if successful could lower the demand for oil and gas. If
these non-petroleum based products and oil alternatives continue to
expand and gain broad acceptance such that the overall demand for
oil and gas is decreased it could have an adverse effect on our
operations and the value of our assets.
Future litigation or governmental proceedings could result in
material adverse consequences, including judgments or
settlements.
From
time to time, we are involved in lawsuits, regulatory inquiries and
may be involved in governmental and other legal proceedings arising
out of the ordinary course of our business. Many of these matters
raise difficult and complicated factual and legal issues and are
subject to uncertainties and complexities. The timing of the final
resolutions to these types of matters is often uncertain.
Additionally, the possible outcomes or resolutions to these matters
could include adverse judgments or settlements, either of which
could require substantial payments, adversely affecting our results
of operations and liquidity.
We may be subject in the normal course of business to judicial,
administrative or other third-party proceedings that could
interrupt or limit our operations, require expensive remediation,
result in adverse judgments, settlements or fines and create
negative publicity.
Governmental
agencies may, among other things, impose fines or penalties on us
relating to the conduct of our business, attempt to revoke or deny
renewal of our operating permits, franchises or licenses for
violations or alleged violations of environmental laws or
regulations or as a result of third-party challenges, require us to
install additional pollution control equipment or require us to
remediate potential environmental problems relating to any real
property that we or our predecessors ever owned, leased or operated
or any waste that we or our predecessors ever collected,
transported, disposed of or stored. Individuals, citizens groups,
trade associations or environmental activists may also bring
actions against us in connection with our operations that could
interrupt or limit the scope of our business. Any adverse outcome
in such proceedings could harm our operations and financial results
and create negative publicity, which could damage our reputation,
competitive position and stock price. We may also be required to
take corrective actions, including, but not limited to, installing
additional equipment, which could require us to make substantial
capital expenditures. We could also be required to indemnify our
employees in connection with any expenses or liabilities that they
may incur individually in connection with regulatory action against
us. These could result in a material adverse effect on our
prospects, business, financial condition and our results of
operations.
A substantial percentage of our recently acquired New Mexico
properties are undeveloped; therefore, the risk associated with our
success is greater than would be the case if the majority of such
properties were categorized as proved developed
producing.
Because
a substantial percentage of our recently acquired New Mexico
properties are undeveloped, we will require significant additional
capital to develop such properties before they may become
productive. Further, because of the inherent uncertainties
associated with drilling for oil and gas, some of these properties
may never be developed to the extent that they result in positive
cash flow. Even if we are successful in our development efforts, it
could take several years for a significant portion of our
undeveloped properties to be converted to positive cash
flow.
Part of our strategy involves using certain of the latest available
horizontal drilling and completion techniques, which involve
additional risks and uncertainties in their application if compared
to conventional drilling.
We
plan to utilize some of the latest horizontal drilling and
completion techniques as developed by us, other oil and gas
exploration and production companies and our service providers. The
additional risks that we face while drilling horizontally include,
but are not limited to, the following:
●
drilling wells that
are significantly longer and/or deeper than more conventional
wells;
●
landing our
wellbore in the desired drilling zone;
●
staying in the
desired drilling zone while drilling horizontally through the
formation;
●
running our casing
the entire length of the wellbore; and
●
being able to run
tools and other equipment consistently through the horizontal
wellbore.
Risks
that we face while completing our wells include, but are not
limited to, the following:
●
the ability to
fracture stimulate the planned number of stages in a horizontal or
lateral well bore;
●
the ability to run
tools the entire length of the wellbore during completion
operations; and
●
the ability to
successfully clean out the wellbore after completion of the final
fracture stimulation stage.
Prospects that we decide to drill may not yield oil or natural gas
in commercially viable quantities.
Our
prospects are in various stages of evaluation, ranging from
prospects that are currently being drilled to prospects that will
require substantial additional seismic data processing and
interpretation. There is no way to predict in advance of drilling
and testing whether any particular prospect will yield oil or
natural gas in sufficient quantities to recover drilling or
completion costs or to be economically viable. This risk may be
enhanced in our situation, due to the fact that a significant
percentage of our reserves is undeveloped. The use of seismic data
and other technologies and the study of producing fields in the
same area will not enable us to know conclusively prior to drilling
whether oil or natural gas will be present or, if present, whether
oil or natural gas will be present in commercial quantities. We
cannot assure you that the analogies we draw from available data
obtained by analyzing other wells, more fully explored prospects or
producing fields will be applicable to our drilling
prospects.
Over the past approximately 21 months we have been significantly
dependent on capital provided to us by SK Energy.
Since
June 2018, SK Energy, which is owned and controlled by Dr. Simon
Kukes, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and director,
has loaned us an aggregate of $51.7 million to support our
operations and for acquisitions, all of which loans were evidenced
by promissory notes. The promissory notes generally had terms which
were more favorable to us than we would have been able to obtain
from third parties, including, generally favorable interest rates,
no restrictions on further borrowing or financial covenants and no
security interests in our assets. All of such notes have to date
been converted into 29.5 million shares of common stock at
conversion prices which were above the then-trading prices of our
common stock. Additionally, pursuant to subscription agreements, SK
Energy purchased an additional aggregate of 15.0 million shares of
common stock from the Company in private transactions for $28.0
million. While SK Energy has verbally advised us that it intends to
provide us additional funding as needed, nothing has been
documented to date, and such future funding, if any, may not
ultimately be provided on favorable terms, if at all. In the event
that we are forced to obtain funding from parties other than SK
Energy, such funding terms will likely not be as favorable to the
Company as the funding provided by SK Energy, and may not be
available in such amounts as previously provided by SK Energy. In
the event SK Energy fails to provide us future funding, when and if
needed, it could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity,
results of operations and could force us to borrow funds from
outside sources on less favorable terms than our prior
debt.
Negative public perception regarding us and/or our industry could
have an adverse effect on our operations.
Negative
public perception regarding us and/or our industry resulting from,
among other things, concerns raised by advocacy groups about
hydraulic fracturing, waste disposal, oil spills, seismic activity,
climate change, explosions of natural gas transmission lines and
the development and operation of pipelines and other midstream
facilities may lead to increased regulatory scrutiny, which may, in
turn, lead to new state and federal safety and environmental laws,
regulations, guidelines and enforcement interpretations.
Additionally, environmental groups, landowners, local groups and
other advocates may oppose our operations through organized
protests, attempts to block or sabotage our operations or those of
our midstream transportation providers, intervene in regulatory or
administrative proceedings involving our assets or those of our
midstream transportation providers, or file lawsuits or other
actions designed to prevent, disrupt or delay the development or
operation of our assets and business or those of our midstream
transportation providers. These actions may cause operational
delays or restrictions, increased operating costs, additional
regulatory burdens and increased risk of litigation. Moreover,
governmental authorities exercise considerable discretion in the
timing and scope of permit issuance and the public may engage in
the permitting process, including through intervention in the
courts. Negative public perception could cause the permits we
require to conduct our operations to be withheld, delayed or
burdened by requirements that restrict our ability to profitably
conduct our business.
Recently,
activists concerned about the potential effects of climate change
have directed their attention towards sources of funding for
fossil-fuel energy companies, which has resulted in certain
financial institutions, funds and other sources of capital
restricting or eliminating their investment in energy-related
activities. Ultimately, this could make it more difficult to secure
funding for exploration and production activities.
Our business could be adversely affected by security threats,
including cybersecurity threats.
We
face various security threats, including cybersecurity threats to
gain unauthorized access to our sensitive information or to render
our information or systems unusable, and threats to the security of
our facilities and infrastructure or third-party facilities and
infrastructure, such as gathering and processing facilities,
refineries, rail facilities and pipelines. The potential for such
security threats subjects our operations to increased risks that
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. For example, unauthorized
access to our seismic data, reserves information or other
proprietary information could lead to data corruption,
communication interruptions, or other disruptions to our
operations.
Our
implementation of various procedures and controls to monitor and
mitigate such security threats and to increase security for our
information, systems, facilities and infrastructure may result in
increased capital and operating costs. Moreover, there can be no
assurance that such procedures and controls will be sufficient to
prevent security breaches from occurring. If any of these security
breaches were to occur, they could lead to losses of, or damage to,
sensitive information or facilities, infrastructure and systems
essential to our business and operations, as well as data
corruption, reputational damage, communication interruptions or
other disruptions to our operations, which, in turn, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial position and
results of operations.
Weather and climate may have a significant and adverse impact on
us.
Demand
for crude oil and natural gas is, to a degree, dependent on weather
and climate, which impacts, among other things, the price we
receive for the commodities we produce and, in turn, our cash flows
and results of operations. For example, relatively warm
temperatures during a winter season generally result in relatively
lower demand for natural gas (as less natural gas is used to heat
residences and businesses) and, as a result, lower prices for
natural gas production.
In
addition, there has been public discussion that climate change may
be associated with more frequent or more extreme weather events,
changes in temperature and precipitation patterns, changes to
ground and surface water availability, and other related phenomena,
which could affect some, or all, of our operations. Our
exploration, exploitation and development activities and equipment
could be adversely affected by extreme weather events, such as
winter storms, flooding and tropical storms and hurricanes, which
may cause a loss of production from temporary cessation of activity
or damaged facilities and equipment. Such extreme weather events
could also impact other areas of our operations, including access
to our drilling and production facilities for routine operations,
maintenance and repairs, the installation and operation of
gathering, processing, compression, storage and transportation
facilities and the availability of, and our access to, necessary
third-party services, such as gathering, processing, compression,
storage and transportation services. Such extreme weather events
and changes in weather patterns may materially and adversely affect
our business and, in turn, our financial condition and results of
operations.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
We currently have an illiquid and volatile market for our common
stock, and the market for our common stock is and may remain
illiquid and volatile in the future.
We currently have a
highly sporadic, illiquid and volatile market for our common stock,
which market is anticipated to remain sporadic, illiquid and
volatile in the future. Factors that could affect our stock price or
result in fluctuations in the market price or trading volume of our
common stock include:
|
●
|
our
actual or anticipated operating and financial performance and
drilling locations, including reserves estimates;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
quarterly
variations in the rate of growth of our financial indicators, such
as net income per share, net income and cash flows, or those of
companies that are perceived to be similar to us;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
changes
in revenue, cash flows or earnings estimates or publication of
reports by equity research analysts;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
speculation
in the press or investment community;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
public
reaction to our press releases, announcements and filings with the
SEC;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
sales
of our common stock by us or other stockholders, or the perception
that such sales may occur;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
limited amount of our freely tradable common stock available in the
public marketplace;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
general
financial market conditions and oil and natural gas industry market
conditions, including fluctuations in commodity
prices;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
realization of any of the risk factors presented in this Annual
Report;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
recruitment or departure of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
commencement
of, or involvement in, litigation;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
prices of oil and natural gas;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
success of our exploration and development operations, and the
marketing of any oil and natural gas we produce;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
changes
in market valuations of companies similar to ours; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
domestic
and international economic, health, legal and regulatory factors
unrelated to our performance.
|
Our common stock is
listed on the NYSE American under the symbol
“PED.”
Our stock price may be impacted by factors that are unrelated or
disproportionate to our operating performance. The stock markets in general have
experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the
operating performance of particular companies. These broad market
fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common
stock. Additionally, general economic,
political and market conditions, such as recessions, interest rates
or international currency fluctuations may adversely affect the
market price of our common stock. Due to the limited volume of our
shares which trade, we believe that our stock prices (bid, ask and
closing prices) may not be related to our actual value, and
not reflect the actual value of our common stock. Stockholders and
potential investors in our common stock should exercise caution
before making an investment in us.
Additionally,
as a result of the illiquidity of our common stock, investors may
not be interested in owning our common stock because of the
inability to acquire or sell a substantial block of our common
stock at one time. Such illiquidity could have an adverse effect on
the market price of our common stock. In addition, a stockholder
may not be able to borrow funds using our common stock as
collateral because lenders may be unwilling to accept the pledge of
securities having such a limited market. We cannot assure you that
an active trading market for our common stock will develop or, if
one develops, be sustained.
An active liquid trading market for our common stock may not
develop in the future.
Our
common stock currently trades on the NYSE American, although our
common stock’s trading volume is very low. Liquid and active
trading markets usually result in less price volatility and more
efficiency in carrying out investors’ purchase and sale
orders. However, our common stock may continue to have limited
trading volume, and many investors may not be interested in owning
our common stock because of the inability to acquire or sell a
substantial block of our common stock at one time. Such illiquidity
could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common
stock. In addition, a stockholder may not be able to borrow funds
using our common stock as collateral because lenders may be
unwilling to accept the pledge of securities having such a limited
market. We cannot assure you that an active trading market for our
common stock will develop or, if one develops, be
sustained.
We do not presently intend to pay any cash dividends on or
repurchase any shares of our common stock.
We
do not presently intend to pay any cash dividends on our common
stock or to repurchase any shares of our common stock. Any payment
of future dividends will be at the discretion of the board of
directors and will depend on, among other things, our earnings,
financial condition, capital requirements, level of indebtedness,
statutory and contractual restrictions applying to the payment of
dividends and other considerations that our board of directors
deems relevant. Cash dividend payments in the future may only be
made out of legally available funds and, if we experience
substantial losses, such funds may not be available. Accordingly,
you may have to sell some or all of your common stock in order to
generate cash flow from your investment, and there is no guarantee
that the price of our common stock that will prevail in the market
will ever exceed the price paid by you.
Because we are a small company, the requirements of being a public
company, including compliance with the reporting requirements of
the Exchange Act and the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act and the Dodd-Frank Act, may strain our resources, increase our
costs and distract management, and we may be unable to comply with
these requirements in a timely or cost-effective
manner.
As a public company with listed equity securities,
we must comply with the federal securities laws, rules and
regulations, including certain corporate governance provisions of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley
Act”) and the
Dodd-Frank Act, related rules and regulations of the SEC and the
NYSE American, with which a private company is not required to
comply. Complying with these laws, rules and regulations will
occupy a significant amount of time of our board of directors and
management and will significantly increase our costs and expenses,
which we cannot estimate accurately at this time. Among other
things, we must:
|
●
|
establish
and maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting
in compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the related rules and regulations of the SEC
and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
comply
with rules and regulations promulgated by the NYSE
American;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
prepare
and distribute periodic public reports in compliance with our
obligations under the federal securities laws;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
maintain
various internal compliance and disclosures policies, such as those
relating to disclosure controls and procedures and insider trading
in our common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
involve
and retain to a greater degree outside counsel and accountants in
the above activities;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
maintain
a comprehensive internal audit function; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
maintain
an investor relations function.
|
In
addition, being a public company subject to these rules and
regulations may require us to accept less director and officer
liability insurance coverage than we desire or to incur substantial
costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make it more
difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our
board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee,
and qualified executive officers.
Future sales of our common stock could cause our stock price to
decline.
If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of
our common stock in the public market, the market price of our
common stock could decrease significantly. The perception in the
public market that our stockholders might sell shares of our common
stock could also depress the market price of our common
stock.
A decline in the price of shares of
our common stock might impede our ability to raise capital through
the issuance of additional shares of our common stock or other
equity securities.
Our outstanding options, warrants and convertible
securities may adversely affect the trading price of our
common stock.
As
of December 31, 2019, there are outstanding stock options to
purchase 753,349 shares of our common stock and outstanding
warrants to purchase 150,329 shares of our common stock. For the
life of the options and warrants, the holders have the opportunity
to profit from a rise in the market price of our common stock
without assuming the risk of ownership. The issuance of shares upon
the exercise of outstanding securities will also dilute the
ownership interests of our existing stockholders.
The
availability of these shares for public resale, as well as any
actual resales of these shares, could adversely affect the trading
price of our common stock. We previously filed registration
statements with the SEC on Form S-8 providing for the registration
of an aggregate of approximately 8,134,915 shares of our common
stock, issued, issuable or reserved for issuance under our equity
incentive plans. Subject to the satisfaction of vesting conditions,
the expiration of lockup agreements, any management 10b5-1 plans
and certain restrictions on sales by affiliates, shares registered
under registration statements on Form S-8 will be available for
resale immediately in the public market without
restriction.
We
cannot predict the size of future issuances of our common stock
pursuant to the exercise of outstanding options or warrants or
conversion of other securities, or the effect, if any, that future
issuances and sales of shares of our common stock may have on the
market price of our common stock. Sales or distributions of
substantial amounts of our common stock (including shares
issued in connection with an acquisition), or the perception that
such sales could occur, may cause the market price of our common
stock to decline.
We depend significantly upon the continued involvement of our
present management.
We
depend to a significant degree upon the involvement of our
management, specifically, our Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Simon
Kukes and our President, Mr. J. Douglas Schick. Our performance and
success are dependent to a large extent on the efforts and
continued employment of Dr. Kukes and Mr. Schick. We do not believe
that Dr. Kukes or Mr. Schick could be quickly replaced with
personnel of equal experience and capabilities, and their
successor(s) may not be as effective. If Dr. Kukes, Mr.
Schick, or any of our other key personnel resign or become unable
to continue in their present roles and if they are not adequately
replaced, our business operations could be adversely affected. We
have no employment or similar agreement in place with Dr. Kukes.
Mr. Schick is party to an employment agreement with us which has no
stated term and can be terminated by either party without
cause.
We
have an active board of directors that meets several times
throughout the year and is intimately involved in our business and
the determination of our operational strategies. Members of our
board of directors work closely with management to identify
potential prospects, acquisitions and areas for further
development. If any of our directors resign or become unable to
continue in their present role, it may be difficult to find
replacements with the same knowledge and experience and as a
result, our operations may be adversely affected.
Dr. Simon Kukes, our Chief Executive
Officer and a member of board of directors, beneficially
owns 74.5% of our common stock
through SK Energy LLC, which gives him majority voting control over
stockholder matters and his interests may be different from your
interests.
Dr.
Simon Kukes, our Chief Executive Officer and member of the board of
directors, is the principal and sole owner of SK Energy LLC, which
beneficially owns approximately 71.8% of our issued and outstanding
common stock and Dr. Kukes, together with the ownership of SK
Energy, beneficially owns approximately 74.5% of our issued and
outstanding common stock. As such, Dr. Kukes can control the
outcome of all matters requiring a stockholder vote, including the
election of directors, the adoption of amendments to our
certificate of formation or bylaws and the approval of mergers and
other significant corporate transactions. Subject to any fiduciary
duties owed to the stockholders generally, while Dr. Kukes’
interests may generally be aligned with the interests of our
stockholders, in some instances Dr. Kukes may have interests
different than the rest of our stockholders, including but not
limited to, future potential company financings in which SK Energy
may participate, or his leadership at the Company. Dr. Kukes’
influence or control of our company as a stockholder may have
the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control
of our company and may adversely affect the voting and other
rights of other stockholders. Because Dr. Kukes controls the
stockholder vote, investors may find it difficult to replace Dr.
Kukes (and such persons as he may appoint from time to
time) as members of our management if they disagree with the
way our business is being operated. Additionally, the interests of
Dr. Kukes may differ from the interests of the other stockholders
and thus result in corporate decisions that are adverse to other
stockholders.
Provisions of Texas law may have anti-takeover effects that could
prevent a change in control even if it might be beneficial to our
stockholders.
Provisions of Texas law may discourage, delay or
prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us, which may cause
the market price of our common stock to decline. Under Texas law, a
stockholder who beneficially owns more than 20% of our voting
stock, or any “affiliated
stockholder,” cannot
acquire us for a period of three years from the date this person
became an affiliated stockholder, unless various conditions are
met, such as approval of the transaction by our board of directors
before this person became an affiliated stockholder (such as the
approval of our board of directors of Dr. Kukes’ ownership of
the Company) or approval of the holders of at least two-thirds
of our outstanding voting shares not beneficially owned by the
affiliated stockholder.
Our board of directors can authorize the issuance of preferred
stock, which could diminish the rights of holders of our common
stock and make a change of control of our company more
difficult even if it might benefit our stockholders.
Our
board of directors is authorized to issue shares of preferred stock
in one or more series and to fix the voting powers, preferences and
other rights and limitations of the preferred stock. Shares of
preferred stock may be issued by our board of directors without
stockholder approval, with voting powers and such preferences and
relative, participating, optional or other special rights and
powers as determined by our board of directors, which may be
greater than the shares of common stock currently outstanding. As a
result, shares of preferred stock may be issued by our board of
directors which cause the holders to have majority voting power
over our shares, provide the holders of the preferred stock the
right to convert the shares of preferred stock they hold into
shares of our common stock, which may cause substantial dilution to
our then common stock stockholders and/or have other rights and
preferences greater than those of our common stock stockholders
including having a preference over our common stock with respect to
dividends or distributions on liquidation or
dissolution.
Investors
should keep in mind that the board of directors has the authority
to issue additional shares of common stock and preferred stock,
which could cause substantial dilution to our existing
stockholders. Additionally, the dilutive effect of any preferred
stock which we may issue may be exacerbated given the fact that
such preferred stock may have voting rights and/or other rights or
preferences which could provide the preferred stockholders with
substantial voting control over us subsequent to the date of this
Annual Report and/or give those holders the power to prevent or
cause a change in control, even if that change in control might
benefit our stockholders. As a result, the issuance of shares of
common stock and/or preferred stock may cause the value of our
securities to decrease.
Securities analysts may not cover, or continue to cover, our common
stock and this may have a negative impact on our common
stock’s market price.
The trading market for our common stock will depend, in part, on
the research and reports that securities or industry analysts
publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over
independent analysts (provided that we have engaged various
non-independent analysts). We currently only have a few independent
analysts that cover our common stock, and these analysts may
discontinue coverage of our common stock at any time. Further, we
may not be able to obtain additional research coverage by
independent securities and industry analysts. If no independent
securities or industry analysts continue coverage of us, the
trading price for our common stock could be negatively impacted. If
one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our common
stock, changes their opinion of our shares or publishes inaccurate
or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price could
decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or
fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our common
stock could decrease and we could lose visibility in the financial
markets, which could cause our stock price and trading volume to
decline.
Stockholders may be diluted significantly through our efforts to
obtain financing and satisfy obligations through the issuance of
securities.
Wherever possible, our
board of directors will attempt to use non-cash consideration to
satisfy obligations. In many instances, we believe that the
non-cash consideration will consist of shares of our common stock,
preferred stock or warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.
Our board of directors has authority, without action or vote of the
stockholders, subject to
the requirements of the NYSE American (which generally require
stockholder approval for any transactions which would result in the
issuance of more than 20% of our then outstanding shares of common
stock or voting rights representing over 20% of our then
outstanding shares of stock, subject to certain exceptions,
including sales in a public offering and/or sales which are
undertaken at or above the lower of the closing price immediately
preceding the signing of the binding agreement or the average
closing price for the five trading days immediately preceding the
signing of the binding agreement), to issue all or part of
the authorized but unissued shares of common stock, preferred stock
or warrants to purchase such shares of common stock. In addition,
we may attempt to raise capital by selling shares of our common
stock, possibly at a discount to market in the future. These
actions will result in dilution of the ownership interests of
existing stockholders and may further dilute common stock book
value, and that dilution may be material. Such issuances may also
serve to enhance existing management’s ability to maintain
control of us, because the shares may be issued to parties or
entities committed to supporting existing
management.
We are subject to the Continued Listing Criteria of the NYSE
American and our failure to satisfy these criteria may result in
delisting of our common stock.
Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE
American. In order to maintain this listing, we must maintain
certain share prices, financial and share distribution targets,
including maintaining a minimum amount of stockholders’
equity and a minimum number of public stockholders. In addition to
these objective standards, the NYSE American may delist the
securities of any issuer if, in its opinion, the issuer’s
financial condition and/or operating results appear unsatisfactory;
if it appears that the extent of public distribution or the
aggregate market value of the security has become so reduced as to
make continued listing on the NYSE American inadvisable; if the
issuer sells or disposes of principal operating assets or ceases to
be an operating company; if an issuer fails to comply with the NYSE
American’s listing requirements; if an issuer’s common
stock sells at what the NYSE American considers a
“low selling
price” (generally trading
below $0.20 per share for an extended period of time) and the
issuer fails to correct this via a reverse split of shares after
notification by the NYSE American (provided that issuers can also
be delisted if any shares of the issuer trade below $0.06 per
share); or if any other event occurs or any condition exists which
makes continued listing on the NYSE American, in its opinion,
inadvisable.
If
the NYSE American delists our common stock, investors may face
material adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, a
lack of trading market for our securities, reduced liquidity,
decreased analyst coverage of our securities, and an inability for
us to obtain additional financing to fund our
operations.
Due to the fact that our common stock is listed on the NYSE
American, we are subject to financial and other reporting and
corporate governance requirements which increase our costs and
expenses.
We are currently required to file annual and quarterly information
and other reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission that
are specified in Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Additionally, due to the fact that our common stock is listed on
the NYSE American, we are also subject to the requirements to
maintain independent directors, comply with other corporate
governance requirements and are required to pay annual listing and
stock issuance fees. These obligations require a commitment of
additional resources including, but not limited, to additional
expenses, and may result in the diversion of our senior
management’s time and attention from our day-to-day
operations. These obligations increase our expenses and may make it
more complicated or time consuming for us to undertake certain
corporate actions due to the fact that we may require NYSE approval
for such transactions and/or NYSE rules may require us to obtain
stockholder approval for such transactions.
If persons engage in short sales of our common stock, including
sales of shares to be issued upon exercise of our outstanding
warrants, the price of our common stock may decline.
Selling
short is a technique used by a stockholder to take advantage of an
anticipated decline in the price of a security. In addition,
holders of options and warrants will sometimes sell short knowing
they can, in effect, cover through the exercise of an option or
warrant, thus locking in a profit. A significant number of short
sales or a large volume of other sales within a relatively short
period of time can create downward pressure on the market price of
a security. Further sales of common stock issued upon exercise of
our outstanding warrants could cause even greater declines in the
price of our common stock due to the number of additional shares
available in the market upon such exercise, which could encourage
short sales that could further undermine the value of our common
stock. Stockholders could, therefore, experience a decline in the
values of their investment as a result of short sales of our common
stock.