Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
þ
 
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
or
o
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     _
Commission file number 001-37666
PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
47-4668380
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3980 Howard Hughes Parkway
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(702) 541-7777
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share
 
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a small reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “small reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o  
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company o
Emerging growth company o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES o NO þ
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2017 was $1,090 million based on a closing price of $19.76 per share of common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.
The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock as of the close of business on February 23, 2018 was 58,133,737 .
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive 2018 proxy statement, anticipated to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.



PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 



PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EX101 Instance Document
 
EX101 Schema Document
 
EX101 Calculation Linkbase Document
 
EX101 Definition Linkbase Document
 
EX101 Label Linkbase Document
 
EX101 Presentation Linkbase Document
 



Table of Contents

PART I
Item 1.
Business
 
Overview

The Company

Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. owns and operates 16 gaming, hospitality and entertainment businesses, of which 15 operate in leased facilities. Our owned facility is located in Ohio and our leased facilities are located in Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada and Pennsylvania. The leased facilities located outside of Pennsylvania are subject to the Master Lease (as defined below) and our leased facility located in Pennsylvania is subject to the Meadows Lease (as defined below). We view each of our operating businesses as an operating segment with the exception of our two businesses in Jackpot, Nevada, which we view as one operating segment. For financial reporting purposes, we aggregate our operating segments into three reportable segments: Midwest, South and West (see “ Operating Properties ” below).

Our mission is to increase stockholder value. We seek to increase revenues through enhancing the guest experience by providing them with their favorite games, restaurants, hotel accommodations, entertainment and other amenities in attractive surroundings with high-quality guest service and our my choice guest loyalty program. We seek to improve cash flows by focusing on operational excellence and efficiency while trying to exceed our guests’ expectations of value. In making decisions, we consider our stockholders, guests, team members and other constituents in the communities in which we operate.

Over the last several years, we have grown through strategic acquisitions, notably the acquisition of Ameristar Casinos, Inc. (“Ameristar”) in August 2013 and the acquisition of The Meadows Racetrack and Casino (“Meadows”) in September 2016, as well as through the development and opening of three properties: Belterra Park, L’Auberge Baton Rouge and River City. We have also made strategic dispositions over the last several years, notably the April 2016 sale-leaseback of the majority of our real estate assets to Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (“GLPI”), a real estate investment trust, and the sale of the equity interests in subsidiaries that operated the Lumiére Place Casino, HoteLumiére, and the Four Seasons Hotel St. Louis (collectively, the “Lumiére Place Casino and Hotels”).

References herein to “Pinnacle,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” refer to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and its subsidiaries, except where stated or the context otherwise indicates. References to “Former Pinnacle” refer to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. prior to the Spin-Off and Merger (as such terms are defined below).

Proposed Company Sale

On December 17, 2017, Pinnacle entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “ Penn National Merger Agreement ”) with Penn National Gaming, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (“ Penn National ”), and Franchise Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Penn National (“ Franchise Merger Sub ”), providing for the merger of Franchise Merger Sub with and into Pinnacle (the “ Proposed Company Sale ”), with Pinnacle surviving the Proposed Company Sale as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Penn National .

At the effective time of the Proposed Company Sale , each share of Pinnacle common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “ Pinnacle Common Stock ”), issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than shares held by Penn National and other than dissenting shares) will be canceled and converted automatically into the right to receive (i) $20.00 in cash (plus, if the Proposed Company Sale is not consummated on or prior to October 31, 2018, $0.01 for each day during the period commencing on November 1, 2018 through the effective time of the Proposed Company Sale ) (the “Cash Consideration”) and (ii) 0.42 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Penn National (the “ Penn National Common Stock ”) (the “Exchange Ratio”; together with the Cash Consideration and cash required to be paid in lieu of fractional shares of Penn National Common Stock, the “ Proposed Company Sale Consideration ”).

In connection with the Proposed Company Sale , Penn National entered into (i) a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Membership Interest Purchase Agreement”) with Boyd Gaming Corporation (“ Boyd ”), to which Pinnacle will become a party immediately prior to the Proposed Company Sale , pursuant to which a subsidiary of Boyd will acquire the gaming and related operations of Ameristar St. Charles, Ameristar Kansas City, Belterra Resort and Belterra Park, in connection with the Proposed Company Sale ; and (ii) definitive agreements with a subsidiary of GLPI, a Pennsylvania corporation, to which Pinnacle will become a party immediately prior to the Proposed Company Sale , pursuant to which GLPI’s subsidiary will acquire the real estate associated with Belterra Park, from Pinnacle, and Plainridge Park Casino in Plainville, Massachusetts, from Penn National . At the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, GLPI

1

Table of Contents

and Boyd will enter into a master lease agreement for the gaming operations acquired by Boyd and Penn National will assume Pinnacle’s existing Master Lease and Meadows Lease and enter into certain amendments thereto.

Completion of the Proposed Company Sale is subject to certain conditions, many of which are beyond our control, including, among others: (1) receipt of the approval of stockholders of both Penn National and Pinnacle as required for the transaction, including the approval of the issuance of Penn National ’s common stock in connection with the Proposed Company Sale Consideration ; (2) the absence of any injunction, restraining order or other orders or laws prohibiting the consummation of the Proposed Company Sale ; (3) the expiration or termination of any waiting period applicable to the Proposed Company Sale under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Acts of 1976, as amended; (4) the receipt of all required regulatory approvals in a timely manner (including receipt of necessary approvals from gaming regulatory authorities); (5) the registration of the shares of Penn National to be issued to stockholders of Pinnacle; and (6) the listing of the shares of Penn National on The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”). The obligation of each party to consummate the Proposed Company Sale is also conditioned upon the accuracy of the other party’s representations and warranties, the absence of a material adverse effect involving the other party, and the other party having performed in all material respects its obligations under the Penn National Merger Agreement . Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the closing conditions, the Proposed Company Sale is expected to close in the second half of 2018. If the Proposed Company Sale is completed, Pinnacle stockholders will hold approximately 22% of the combined company’s outstanding shares.

If the Proposed Company Sale is not consummated on or before October 31, 2018, subject to certain limited extensions (including pursuant to Penn National’s election to extend under certain circumstances) provided in the Penn National Merger Agreement , either party may terminate the Penn National Merger Agreement . Consummation of the Proposed Company Sale is not subject to a financing condition.

There can be no assurance that the Proposed Company Sale will be completed as contemplated. Furthermore, there are a number of risks and uncertainties to our business related to the Proposed Company Sale . For additional information, please see Item 1A. “Risk Factors, Risks Relating to the Proposed Company Sale to Penn National.”

Spin-Off and Merger

On April 28, 2016, Former Pinnacle completed the transactions under the terms of a definitive agreement with GLPI (the “ GLPI Merger Agreement ”). Pursuant to the terms of the GLPI Merger Agreement , Former Pinnacle separated its operating assets and liabilities (and its Belterra Park property and excess land at certain locations) into the Company, a newly formed subsidiary initially named PNK Entertainment, Inc., and distributed to its stockholders, on a pro rata basis, all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company (such distribution referred to as the “Spin-Off”). As a result, Former Pinnacle stockholders received one share of the Company’s common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share, for each share of Former Pinnacle common stock that they owned. Gold Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of GLPI (“Merger Sub”), then merged with and into Former Pinnacle (the “Merger”), with Merger Sub surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of GLPI. Immediately following the Merger, the Company was renamed Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.

In connection with the Spin-Off and Merger, we entered into a triple-net master lease agreement for the fourteen gaming facilities acquired by GLPI (the “Master Lease”). The Master Lease has an initial term of 10 years with five subsequent, five -year renewal periods at our option.

Acquisition of the Meadows Business

On September 9, 2016, we closed on a purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with GLP Capital, L.P. (“GLPC”), a subsidiary of GLPI, pursuant to which we acquired all of the equity interests of the Meadows located in Washington, Pennsylvania for base consideration of $138.0 million , subject to certain adjustments. The purchase price, after giving effect to such adjustments, was $134.0 million . As a result of the transaction, we own and operate the Meadows’ gaming, entertainment and harness racing business subject to a triple-net lease of its underlying real estate with GLPI (the “Meadows Lease” and collectively with the Master Lease, the “Leases”).




2

Table of Contents

Operating Properties

The following table presents selected statistical and other information concerning the properties in which we operate our businesses as of December 31, 2017 :
 
Location
 
Opening Year
 
Casino Square Footage
 
Slot Machines/
Video Lottery Terminals
 
Table Games
 
Hotel Rooms (1)
 
Food & Beverage Outlets (2)
 
Parking Spaces
Midwest segment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ameristar Council Bluffs
Council Bluffs, IA
 
1996
 
38,500
 
1,525
 
25
 
444
 
8
 
3,017
Ameristar East Chicago
East Chicago, IN
 
1997
 
56,000
 
1,720
 
72
 
288
 
5
 
2,468
Ameristar Kansas City
Kansas City, MO
 
1997
 
140,000
 
2,121
 
74
 
184
 
13
 
8,320
Ameristar St. Charles
St. Charles, MO
 
1994
 
130,000
 
2,290
 
75
 
397
 
15
 
6,775
Belterra Resort
Florence, IN
 
2000
 
47,000
 
1,190
 
42
 
662
 
6
 
2,528
Belterra Park
Cincinnati, OH
 
2014
 
51,800
 
1,362
 
 
 
5
 
2,318
Meadows
Washington, PA
 
2009
 
131,000
 
3,052
 
87
 
 
15
 
3,912
River City
St. Louis, MO
 
2010
 
90,000
 
1,925
 
53
 
200
 
10
 
4,122
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
South segment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ameristar Vicksburg
Vicksburg, MS
 
1994
 
70,000
 
1,335
 
37
 
149
 
4
 
3,063
Boomtown Bossier City
Bossier City, LA
 
1996
 
30,000
 
864
 
16
 
187
 
4
 
1,867
Boomtown New Orleans
New Orleans, LA
 
1994
 
30,000
 
1,205
 
28
 
150
 
5
 
1,907
L’Auberge Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, LA
 
2012
 
74,000
 
1,440
 
49
 
205
 
9
 
2,689
L’Auberge Lake Charles
Lake Charles, LA
 
2005
 
70,000
 
1,518
 
75
 
995
 
10
 
3,236
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
West segment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ameristar Black Hawk
Black Hawk, CO
 
2001
 
56,000
 
1,183
 
62
 
535
 
6
 
1,500
Cactus Petes and Horseshu
Jackpot, NV
 
1956
 
29,000
 
740
 
21
 
416
 
9
 
912
 
 
 
 
 
1,043,300
 
23,470
 
716
 
4,812
 
124
 
48,634
(1)
Includes 284 rooms at Ameristar Council Bluffs operated by a third party and located on land leased by us and subleased to such third party and 54 rooms at Belterra Resort relating to the Ogle Haus Inn, which is operated by us and located near Belterra Resort.
(2)
Includes one outlet each at Ameristar Kansas City and Meadows that are subleased to and operated by third parties.
Midwest Segment
The Ameristar Council Bluffs property is located across the Missouri River from Omaha, Nebraska and includes the largest riverboat in Iowa. This location serves the Omaha and southwestern Iowa markets. Ameristar Council Bluffs operates one of three gaming licenses issued in the Council Bluffs gaming market pursuant to an operating agreement with the Iowa West Racing Association. The two other licenses are operated by a single company and consist of two land-based casinos.
The Ameristar East Chicago property is located approximately 25 miles from downtown Chicago, Illinois and serves metropolitan Chicago and Northwest Indiana. Ameristar East Chicago’s core competitive markets include Northwest Indiana and Northeast Illinois.
The Ameristar Kansas City property, located approximately seven miles from downtown Kansas City, Missouri, has one of the largest casino floors in Missouri. The property attracts guests from the greater Kansas City area as well as regional overnight guests. Ameristar Kansas City competes with several other gaming operations located in or around Kansas City, Missouri and other regional Midwest markets.
The Ameristar St. Charles and River City properties are located in the St. Louis, Missouri metropolitan area. Ameristar St. Charles is located in St. Charles at the Missouri River, strategically situated to attract guests from the St. Charles and the greater St. Louis areas as well as tourists from outside the region. The property, which is in close proximity to the St. Charles convention facility, is located along the western bank of the Missouri River. The River City property is located just south of the confluence of the Mississippi River and the River des Peres in the south St. Louis community of Lemay, Missouri. Both of the

3

Table of Contents

St. Louis properties compete with other gaming operations located in the metropolitan St. Louis area and other regional Midwest markets. Two of these competitors are located in Illinois.
The southern Indiana property, Belterra Resort , is located along the Ohio River near Vevay, Indiana, approximately 50 minutes from downtown Cincinnati, Ohio, 70 minutes from Louisville, Kentucky, and 90 minutes from Lexington, Kentucky. Belterra Resort is also approximately two and one-half hours from Indianapolis, Indiana. Belterra Resort currently competes with four dockside riverboat casinos; a casino resort in French Lick, Indiana, approximately 100 miles west of Belterra Resort, two racetrack casinos in the Indianapolis, Indiana metropolitan area, and multiple casino and racino developments in the state of Ohio, including Belterra Park.
Belterra Park is located approximately 10 miles southeast of downtown Cincinnati, Ohio, situated along the Ohio River. Belterra Park faces competition from casinos and racinos in Ohio and Indiana, including Belterra Resort. In addition to the offerings presented in the table above, Belterra Park offers live racing and pari-mutuel wagering.
The Meadows property is located in Washington, Pennsylvania, approximately 25 miles south of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The Meadows faces competition from casinos and racinos in Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. In addition to the offerings presented in the table above, the Meadows offers a simulcast betting parlor, a harness racetrack and a bowling alley.
South Segment
The Ameristar Vicksburg property is located in Vicksburg, Mississippi along the Mississippi River approximately 45 miles west of Mississippi’s largest city, Jackson. Ameristar Vicksburg is the largest dockside casino in central Mississippi. The property caters primarily to guests from the Vicksburg and Jackson, Mississippi and Monroe, Louisiana areas, along with tourists visiting the area. Ameristar Vicksburg primarily competes with three other gaming operations located in Vicksburg. The property also faces competition from two casinos owned by a Native American tribe in Philadelphia, Mississippi, located about 70 miles east of Jackson and 115 miles east of Vicksburg and from gaming operations located in or immediately surrounding Biloxi, Mississippi and the broader Mississippi Gulf Coast area.
Boomtown Bossier City is located in Bossier City, Louisiana. Boomtown Bossier City features a hotel adjoining a dockside riverboat casino and competes with five dockside riverboat casino hotels, a racetrack slot operation and large Native American casinos in southern Oklahoma. Such Native American facilities are approximately 60 miles north of Dallas, Texas.
Boomtown New Orleans is the only casino in the West Bank area, across the Mississippi River from downtown New Orleans, Louisiana. Boomtown New Orleans competes with a large land-based casino in downtown New Orleans, two riverboat casinos, a racetrack with slot machines and numerous truck stop casinos with video poker machines, as well as casinos on the Mississippi Gulf Coast.
L’Auberge Baton Rouge is located approximately 10 miles southeast of downtown Baton Rouge, Louisiana. L’Auberge Baton Rouge offers a fully-integrated casino entertainment experience. This property competes directly with two casinos in the Baton Rouge area and other resort facilities regionally in New Orleans and the Mississippi Gulf Coast.
L’Auberge Lake Charles , located in Lake Charles, Louisiana, offers one of the closest full-scale casino hotel facilities to Houston, Texas, as well as to the Austin, Texas and San Antonio, Texas metropolitan areas. The location is approximately 140 miles from Houston and approximately 300 miles and 335 miles from Austin and San Antonio, respectively. This property competes with other full-service regional and destination resort casinos, including those in Lake Charles, Louisiana; New Orleans, Louisiana; Biloxi, Mississippi; and Las Vegas, Nevada. L’Auberge Lake Charles also competes with a land-based Native American casino, which is approximately 43 miles northeast of Lake Charles; a racetrack slot operation located approximately 25 miles to the west; and numerous truck stops with slot machines in many parishes of Louisiana.
West Segment
The Ameristar Black Hawk property, located in the center of the Black Hawk gaming district, is approximately 40 miles west of Denver, Colorado. The property caters primarily to patrons from the Denver metropolitan area and surrounding states and primarily competes with 23 other gaming operations located in the Black Hawk and Central City gaming market in Colorado.
The Cactus Petes and Horseshu properties (collectively, “the Jackpot Properties”) are located in Jackpot, Nevada, just south of the Idaho border. The Jackpot Properties serve guests primarily from Idaho, and secondarily from Oregon, Washington, Montana, northern California and the southwestern Canadian provinces. The Jackpot Properties compete primarily with three other hotels and motels (all of which also have casinos) in Jackpot and a Native American casino and hotel near Pocatello, Idaho.

4

Table of Contents

Other Assets and Operations
    
We own and operate the Heartland Poker Tour , which is a live and televised poker tournament series.

We own 75.5% of the equity of Pinnacle Retama Partners, LLC , which is the owner of the racing license utilized in the operation of Retama Park Racetrack. We also have a management contract with Retama Development Corporation to manage the day-to-day operations of Retama Park Racetrack.

Financial information about segments and geographic areas is incorporated by reference from Note 13, “Segment Information,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Competition
We face significant competition in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. Such competition may intensify in some of these jurisdictions if new gaming operations open in these markets or existing competitors expand their operations. Our businesses compete directly with other gaming businesses in each state in which we operate, as well as businesses in other states. We also compete for customers with other casino operators in other markets, including casinos located on Native American reservations, and other forms of gaming, such as lotteries and internet gaming. Many of our competitors are larger and have substantially greater name recognition and marketing and financial resources. In some instances, particularly with Native American casinos, our competitors pay substantially lower taxes or no taxes at all, as compared to us. We believe that increased legalized gaming in certain states, particularly in areas close to where our existing gaming businesses are located; the development or expansion of Native American gaming in or near the states in which we operate; and the potential legalization of internet gaming could create additional competition for us and could adversely affect our operations or proposed development projects.

Government Regulation and Gaming Issues

The gaming industry is highly regulated, and we must obtain and maintain certain licenses to continue our operations. Each of the casinos on which we operate is subject to extensive regulation under the laws, rules and regulations of the jurisdiction in which it is located. These laws, rules and regulations generally concern the responsibility, financial stability and character of the owners, managers, and persons with financial interests in the gaming operations. Violations of laws in one jurisdiction could result in disciplinary action in other jurisdictions. For a more detailed description of the statutes and regulations to which we are subject, please see Exhibit 99.1, “Government Regulation and Gaming Issues,” to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Our businesses are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations in addition to gaming regulations. These laws and regulations include, but are not limited to, restrictions and conditions concerning alcoholic beverages, environmental matters, employees, currency transactions, taxation, zoning and building codes, and marketing and advertising. Such laws and regulations could change or could be interpreted differently in the future, or new laws and regulations could be enacted. Material changes, new laws or regulations, or material differences in interpretations by courts or governmental authorities could adversely affect our operating results.

Compliance with federal, state and local provisions which have been enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment have not had a material effect upon our capital expenditures, earnings or the competitive positions of our properties. From time to time, certain development projects may require substantial costs for environmental remediation due to prior use of our development sites. Our project budgets for such a site typically include amounts expected to cover the remediation work required.


5

Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Registrant
The persons serving as our executive officers and their positions with us are as follows:
NAME
 
POSITION WITH THE COMPANY
Anthony M. Sanfilippo
 
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Carlos A. Ruisanchez
 
President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
Donna S. Negrotto
 
Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
Virginia E. Shanks
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
Troy A. Stremming
 
Executive Vice President, Government Relations and Public Affairs
Neil E. Walkoff
 
Executive Vice President, Operations

Directors of the Registrant
The following table lists our directors, their principal occupations and principal employers:
NAME
 
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION & EMPLOYER
Anthony M. Sanfilippo
 
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.
Carlos A. Ruisanchez
 
President and Chief Financial Officer of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.
Charles L. Atwood
 
Lead Independent Director of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., Advisor and Lead Trustee, Equity Residential
Stephen C. Comer
 
Retired Accounting Firm Managing Partner
Ron Huberman
 
Chief Executive Officer of Benchmark Analytics and Senior Advisor of PeopleAdmin
James L. Martineau
 
Corporate Director, Private Investor and Advisor
Jaynie M. Studenmund
 
Corporate Director and Advisor
Desirée Rogers
 
Corporate Director

Other

Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. is a Delaware corporation which was incorporated in 2016 as a result of the Spin-Off and Merger transactions discussed above. Former Pinnacle, which was acquired by GLPI in April 2016, was a Delaware corporation and the successor to the Hollywood Park Turf Club, which was organized in 1938. Former Pinnacle was incorporated in 1981 under the name Hollywood Park Realty Enterprises, Inc., changed its name to Hollywood Park, Inc. in 1992, and later changed its name again to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. in 2000.

As of December 31, 2017, we employed 15,377 full-time and part-time employees.

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports are available free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) through our internet website, www.pnk.com. Our filings are also available through a database maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov.

6

Table of Contents

Item 1A.
Risk Factors

An investment in our securities is subject to risks inherent to our business. We have described below what we currently believe to be the material risks and uncertainties in our business. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors. We also face other risks and uncertainties beyond what is described below. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the value of securities, including our common stock, could decline significantly. You could lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Relating to the Proposed Company Sale to Penn National

The announcement and pendency of the Proposed Company Sale to Penn National may have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price.

There are a number of risks and uncertainties related to the Proposed Company Sale that may adversely affect our business, operating results and stock price, whether or not the Proposed Company Sale is completed, including: (1) having to focus the Company’s management on the Proposed Company Sale , which could lead to disruption of the Company’s ongoing business or inconsistencies in its services, standards, controls, procedures and policies, (2) potential difficulties in recruiting and retaining team members as a result of the transaction; (3) the transaction may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays, including those arising from legal proceedings related to the transaction; (4) our business, including our relationships with our guests, team members and suppliers, may suffer as a result of uncertainty surrounding the Proposed Company Sale ; (5) certain persons with whom the Company have a business relationship may delay or defer certain business decisions or might decide to seek to terminate, change or renegotiate their relationships with the Company as a result of the Proposed Company Sale ; (6) that we may be adversely affected by other economic, business or competitive factors during the time the Proposed Company Sale is pending; and (7) that the Penn National Merger Agreement contains provisions that place certain restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to the completion of the Proposed Company Sale , which may disrupt our current plans and operations, including plans for future growth, and/or adversely affect our ability to execute certain of our business strategies, including the ability in certain cases to enter into contracts, acquire or dispose of assets, incur indebtedness or incur capital expenditures.

In connection with the Proposed Company Sale to Penn National, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a putative class action lawsuit against the Company and its directors in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act because the preliminary Form S-4 filed with the SEC allegedly contains material omissions and misstatements. The complaint seeks, among other things, injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the Proposed Company Sale until additional disclosures are made, and damages. While we believe that the allegations in this lawsuit are without merit and intend to defend vigorously against these allegations, we cannot assure you as to the outcome of this, or any similar future lawsuits, including the costs associated with defending these claims or any other liabilities that may be incurred in connection with litigation or settlement of these claims.

Because the Exchange Ratio is fixed and the market prices of Penn National Common Stock and Pinnacle Common Stock may fluctuate, our stockholders cannot be sure of the value of the Penn National Common Stock they will receive on the closing date.

The consideration that our stockholders will receive will be $20.00 in cash (plus, if the Proposed Company Sale is not consummated on or prior to October 31, 2018, $0.01 for each day during the period commencing on November 1, 2018 through the effective time of the Proposed Company Sale ) and 0.42 share of Penn National Common Stock for every outstanding share of Pinnacle Common Stock and such Exchange Ratio will not vary based on the market price of Penn National Common Stock before the effective time of the Proposed Company Sale . If the market price of Penn National Common Stock declines prior to the closing of the Proposed Company Sale , the per share consideration our stockholders will receive could reflect a lower value than that upon which the Proposed Company Sale was valued at the time we entered into the Penn National Merger Agreement .

The Proposed Company Sale to Penn National may not be completed.

The Proposed Company Sale pursuant to which Penn National will acquire Pinnacle may not be completed as contemplated for a variety of reasons, including: (1) conditions to the closing of the transaction may not be satisfied; (2) the

7

Table of Contents

occurrence of an event, change or other circumstance that could give rise to the termination of the Penn National Merger Agreement ; and (3) other risks to the consummation of the Proposed Company Sale .

Completion of the Proposed Company Sale is subject to certain conditions, many of which are beyond our control, including, among others: (1) receipt of the approval of stockholders of both Penn National and Pinnacle as required for the transaction, including the approval of the issuance of Penn National ’s common stock in connection with the Proposed Company Sale consideration; (2) the absence of any injunction, restraining order or other orders or laws prohibiting the consummation of the Proposed Company Sale ; (3) the expiration or termination of any waiting period applicable to the Proposed Company Sale under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Acts of 1976, as amended; (4) the receipt of all required regulatory approvals in a timely manner (including receipt of necessary approvals from gaming regulatory authorities); (4) the registration of the shares of Penn National to be issued to stockholders of Pinnacle; and (5) the listing of the shares of Penn National on NASDAQ. The obligation of each party to consummate the Proposed Company Sale is also conditioned upon the accuracy of the other party’s representations and warranties, the absence of a material adverse effect involving the other party, and the other party having performed in all material respects its obligations under the Penn National Merger Agreement .

The Penn National Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both the Company and Penn National . If the Penn National Merger Agreement is terminated by either party because the stockholders of the Company fail to adopt the Penn National Merger Agreement , the Company will be required to pay a fixed expense reimbursement of $30.0 million to Penn National . The Company will be required to pay Penn National a termination fee equal to $60.0 million (less any expenses previously paid to Penn National in the case of a termination described in clause (iii) below) if the Penn National Merger Agreement is terminated (i) by Penn National because the Company’s Board of Directors has made an adverse recommendation change, (ii) by the Company to accept and enter into a Company Superior Proposal (as defined in the Penn National Merger Agreement ), and (iii) by Penn National or the Company because the stockholders of the Company fail to adopt the Penn National Merger Agreement , a Company Takeover Proposal (as defined and adjusted in the Penn National Merger Agreement ) had been publicly announced or becomes publicly known and not publicly withdrawn by at least 15 business days prior to the Company stockholders meeting to vote on the Penn National Merger Agreement , and within 12 months of such a termination the Company enters into or consummates a Company Takeover Proposal. Under certain circumstances, Penn National may be obligated to pay a termination fee to the Company, but such fee may not adequately compensate the Company for its losses.

Failure to complete the Proposed Company Sale to Penn National could negatively impact the stock price and the future business and financial results of the Company.

If the Proposed Company Sale is not completed, the ongoing business of the Company may be adversely affected and the Company will be subject to several risks, including the following:

having to pay certain costs relating to the Proposed Company Sale , such as legal, accounting, financial advisor, filing, printing and mailing fees; and

the Company will have forgone other opportunities in favor of the Proposed Company Sale and committed time and resources of its management to matters related to the Proposed Company Sale instead of pursuing such other opportunities that could be beneficial to the Company, including opportunities the Company is restricted from pursuing due to provisions in the Penn National Merger Agreement that place restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to the completion of the Proposed Company Sale , without realizing any of the benefits of having the Proposed Company Sale completed.

If the Proposed Company Sale is not completed, the Company cannot assure its stockholders that the risks described above will not materialize and will not materially affect its business, financial results, and stock price.

The Penn National Merger Agreement contains provisions that limit the Company’s ability to pursue alternatives to the Proposed Company Sale , could discourage a potential competing acquirer of the Company from making a favorable alternative transaction proposal and, in specified circumstances, could require the Company to pay Penn National a termination fee of $60.0 million.

The Penn National Merger Agreement contains certain provisions that restrict the Company’s ability to initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage or knowingly facilitate any inquiries, proposals, or offers regarding, or the making of a competing proposal, engage in any discussions or negotiations with respect to a competing proposal or furnish any non-public information to any person in connection with a competing proposal. Further, even if the Company’s board of directors changes, withholds, modifies, withdraws or qualifies its recommendation with respect to the Penn National Merger Agreement proposal or the share issuance proposal, as applicable, unless the Company has terminated the Penn National Merger Agreement to accept and enter

8

Table of Contents

into a Company Superior Proposal (as defined in the Penn National Merger Agreement ), the Company will still be required to submit the adoption of the Penn National Merger Agreement to a vote at a special meeting of its stockholders. In addition, Penn National generally has an opportunity to offer to modify the terms of the transactions contemplated by the Penn National Merger Agreement in response to any third-party alternative transaction proposal before the Company’s board of directors may change, withhold, modify, withdraw or qualify its recommendation with respect to the adoption of the Penn National Merger Agreement . In some circumstances, upon termination of the Penn National Merger Agreement , the Company will be required to pay a termination fee of $60.0 million to Penn National .

These provisions could discourage a potential third-party acquirer or merger partner that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant portion of the Company or pursuing an alternative transaction with the Company from considering or proposing such a transaction, even if, in the case of an acquisition of the Company, it were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share price than the per share price proposed to be received in the Proposed Company Sale or might result in a potential third-party acquirer or merger partner proposing to pay a lower price to the stockholders of the Company than it might otherwise have proposed to pay because of the added expense of the $60.0 million termination fee that may become payable in certain circumstances.

The completion of the transactions contemplated by the Penn National Merger Agreement may trigger change in control or other provisions in certain agreements to which the Company is a party.

If the Company and Penn National are unable to negotiate waivers of those provisions, the counterparties may exercise their rights and remedies under the agreements, potentially terminating the agreements or seeking monetary damages. Even if the Company and Penn National are able to negotiate waivers, the counterparties may require a fee for such waivers or seek to renegotiate the agreements on terms less favorable to the Company.

Risks Relating to Our Business

Our business is particularly sensitive to reductions in consumers’ discretionary spending as a result of downturns in the economy or other changes we cannot accurately predict .

Demand for entertainment and leisure activities is sensitive to consumers’ disposable incomes, and thus demand can be affected by changes in the economy that we cannot predict. We compete with a broad range of entertainment and leisure activities and consumer preferences may change. Perceived or actual unfavorable changes in general economic conditions, including recession, economic slowdown, high unemployment levels, housing and credit crises, high fuel or other transportation costs, and changes in consumer confidence may reduce disposable income of our customers or result in fewer patrons visiting our casinos. As a result, we cannot ensure that demand for entertainment and leisure activities will not be adversely affected or that customers will continue to want to frequent our facilities or continue to spend money at our facilities. Many of our younger customers do not play slot machines, which is where we derive the majority of our revenue. In the event that our customers do not use slot machines, this may have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Adverse developments affecting economies throughout the world, including a general tightening of the availability of credit, rising interest rates, increasing energy costs, rising prices, inflation, acts of war or terrorism, natural disasters, declining consumer confidence or significant declines in the stock market could lead to a reduction in discretionary spending on entertainment and leisure activities, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The gaming industry is very competitive and increased competition, including through legislative legalization or expansion of gaming by states in or near where we operate facilities or through Native American gaming facilities and internet gaming, could adversely affect our financial results.

We face significant competition in all of the areas in which we operate. Increased competitive pressures may adversely affect our ability to continue to attract customers or affect our ability to compete efficiently.
Several of the facilities on which we operate are located in jurisdictions that restrict gaming to certain areas and/or may be affected by state laws that currently prohibit or restrict gaming operations. Economic difficulties faced by state governments could lead to intensified political pressures for the legalization of gaming in jurisdictions where it is currently prohibited. The legalization of gaming in such jurisdictions could be an expansion opportunity for us, or create competitive pressure, depending on where the legalization occurs and our ability to capitalize on it. Our ability to attract customers to the existing casinos on which we operate could be significantly and adversely affected by the legalization or expansion of gaming in certain jurisdictions, including, in particular, Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas and West Virginia areas where our customers may also visit, and by the development or expansion of Native American casinos in areas where our customers may visit.

9

Table of Contents

Voters and state legislatures may seek to supplement traditional tax sources of state governments by authorizing or expanding gaming in those jurisdictions. We also face the risk that existing casino licensees will expand their operations and the risk that Native American gaming will continue to grow.

On October 30, 2017, Pennsylvania enacted legislation that expanded gaming by authorizing (i) up to 10 ancillary casinos which may each operate between 300 and 750 slot machine and initially up to 30 table games; (ii) the operation of up to five video gaming terminals at each truck stop that meets certain criteria; and (iii) the establishment of a program to permit internet gaming. This expansion of gaming in Pennsylvania may provide additional competition to the Meadows.

From time to time, our competitors refurbish, rebrand or expand their casino offerings, which could function to increase competition. In addition, changes in ownership may result in improved quality of our competitors’ facilities, which may make such facilities more competitive.
 
We also compete with other forms of legalized gaming and entertainment such as bingo, pull-tab games, card parlors, sports books, pari-mutuel or telephonic betting on horse and dog racing, state-sponsored lotteries, instant racing machines, video lottery terminals (“VLTs”) (including racetracks that offer VLTs), video poker terminals and, in the future, we may compete with gaming or entertainment at other venues. Furthermore, competition from internet lotteries and other internet wagering gaming services, which allow their customers to wager on a wide variety of sporting events and play Las Vegas-style casino games from home, could divert customers from the facilities we operate and thus adversely affect our business. Such internet wagering services are likely to expand in future years and become more accessible to domestic gamblers as a result of U.S. Department of Justice positions related to the application of federal laws to intrastate internet gaming and initiatives in some states to consider legislation to legalize intrastate internet wagering. The law in this area has been rapidly evolving, and additional legislative developments may occur at the federal and state levels that would accelerate the proliferation of certain forms of internet gaming in the United States.

Our gaming operations rely heavily on technology services provided by third parties. In the event that there is an interruption of these services to us, it may have an adverse effect on our operations and financial conditions.

We engage a number of third parties to provide gaming operating systems for the facilities we operate. As a result, we rely on such third parties to provide uninterrupted services to us in order to run our business efficiently and effectively. In the event one of these third parties experiences a disruption in its ability to provide such services to us (whether due to technological difficulties or power problems), this may result in a material disruption at the casinos on which we operate and have a material effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Any unscheduled interruption in our technology services is likely to result in an immediate, and possibly substantial, loss of revenues due to a shutdown of our gaming operations, cloud computing and lottery systems. Such interruptions may occur as a result of, for example, catastrophic events or rolling blackouts. Our systems are also vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, floods, fires, telecommunication failures, terrorist attacks, computer viruses, computer denial-of-service attacks and similar events.

Our business may be harmed from cyber security risk and we may be subject to legal claims if there is loss, disclosure or misappropriation of or access to our guests’ or our business partners’ or our own information or other breaches of our information security.

We make extensive use of online services and centralized data processing, including through third party service providers. The secure maintenance and transmission of customer information is a critical element of our operations. Our information technology and other systems that maintain and transmit guest information, or those of service providers, business partners, or employee information may be compromised by a malicious third party penetration of our network security, or that of a third party service provider or business partner, or impacted by intentional or unintentional actions or inactions by our employees, or those of a third party service provider or business partner. As a result, our guests’ information may be lost, disclosed, accessed or taken without our guests’ consent.

In addition, third party service providers and other business partners process and maintain proprietary business information and data related to our employees, guests, suppliers and other business partners. Our information technology and other systems that maintain and transmit this information, or those of service providers or business partners, may also be compromised by a malicious third party penetration of our network security or that of a third party service provider or business partner, or impacted by intentional or unintentional actions or inactions by our employees or those of a third party service provider or business partner. As a result, our business information, guest, supplier, and other business partner data may be lost, disclosed, accessed or taken without their consent.

10

Table of Contents


Any such loss, disclosure or misappropriation of, or access to, guests’ or business partners’ information or other breach of our information security can result in legal claims or legal proceedings, including regulatory investigations and actions, may have a serious impact on our reputation and may adversely affect our businesses, operating results and financial condition. Furthermore, the loss, disclosure or misappropriation of our business information may adversely affect our reputation, businesses, operating results and financial condition.

We are required to pay a significant portion of our cash flows pursuant to and subject to the terms and conditions of the Leases, which could adversely affect our ability to fund our operations and growth and limit our ability to react to competitive and economic changes.

We are required to pay a significant portion of our cash flow from operations to GLPI pursuant to and subject to the terms and conditions of the Leases. Under the Master Lease, the current annual aggregate rent payable by Pinnacle MLS, LLC, the tenant under the Master Lease, is $382.8 million . In addition, under the Meadows Lease, the current annual aggregate rent payable by PNK Development 33, LLC, the tenant under the Meadows Lease, is $25.8 million . As a result of our significant lease payments, our ability to fund our own operations or development projects, raise capital, make acquisitions and otherwise respond to competitive and economic changes may be adversely affected. For example, our obligations under the Leases may:

make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness and to obtain additional indebtedness;

increase our vulnerability to general or regional adverse economic and industry conditions or a downturn in our business;

reduce the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;

limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate; and

restrict our ability to raise capital, make acquisitions, divestitures and engage in other significant transactions.

Any of the above listed factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The following are certain provisions, among others, of the Master Lease which restrict our ability to freely operate and could have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition:

Escalations in Rent - We are obligated to pay base rent under the Master Lease, and base rent is composed of building base rent and land base rent. Every year of the Master Lease term, building base rent is subject to an annual escalation of up to 2% and we may be required to pay the escalated building base rent regardless of our revenues, profit or general financial condition.

Variable Rent - We are obligated to pay percentage rent under the Master Lease, which is re-calculated every two years. Such percentage rent shall equal 4% of the change between (i) the average net revenues for the trailing two-year period and (ii) 50% of the trailing 12 months net revenues as of the month ending immediately prior to the execution of the Master Lease. We may be required to pay an increase in percentage rent based on increases in net revenues without a corresponding increase in our profits.

New Developments - If we contemplate developing or building a new facility which is located within a 60 mile radius of a facility that is subject to the Master Lease, the annual percentage rent due from the affected existing facility subject to the Master Lease may thereafter be subject to a floor. Therefore, our percentage rent may not decline as a result of a subsequent decline in revenues at the leased properties.

Guaranty by Parent - In connection with certain assignments of the Master Lease, the ultimate parent company of such assignee of the Master Lease must execute a guaranty and shall be required to be solvent. Such requirement may limit our ability to freely assign the Master Lease or pursue certain transactions.


11

Table of Contents

Master Lease Guaranties - The Master Lease is guaranteed by the tenant’s parent and certain subsidiaries of the tenant (the “Lease Guarantors”). A default under any of the Master Lease guaranties that is not cured within the applicable grace period will constitute an event of default under the Master Lease.

Cross-Defaults - If we or any of the Lease Guarantors fail to pay or bond final judgments aggregating in excess of $100 million, and such judgments are not discharged, waived or stayed within 45 days, an event of default will arise under the Master Lease.

Effect of End of Term or Not Renewing the Master Lease - If we do not renew the Master Lease at the stipulated renewals or we do not enter into a new master lease at the end of the term, we will be required to sell the business of tenant. If we cannot agree upon acceptable terms of sale with a qualified successor tenant within a three month period after potential successive tenants are identified, GLPI will select the successor tenant to purchase our business through a competitive auction. If this occurs, we will be required to transfer our business to the highest bidder at the auction, subject to regulatory approvals.

The Meadows Lease contains provisions that are similar to many of the foregoing provisions of the Master Lease.

Substantially all of our gaming facilities are leased and could experience risks associated with leased property, including risks relating to lease termination, lease extensions, charges and our relationship with GLPI, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.

We lease 14 of the gaming facilities we operate pursuant to the Master Lease with GLPI and we lease the Meadows pursuant to the Meadows Lease with GLPI. The Leases provide that GLPI may terminate each lease for a number of reasons, including, subject to applicable cure periods, the default in any payment of rent, taxes or other payment obligations or the breach of any other covenant or agreement in the lease. Termination of either of the Leases could result in a default under our credit agreement with certain lenders, which is comprised of a term loan A facility with a maturity of five years, term loan B facility with a maturity of seven years and a revolving credit facility with a maturity of five years (the “Revolving Credit Facility” and together with the term loan A facility and term loan B facility, the “Senior Secured Credit Facilities”) and the bond indenture governing our 5.625% senior notes due 2024 (“5.625% Notes” and together with the Senior Secured Credit Facilities, the “Debt Agreements”) and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations. There can also be no assurance that we will be able to comply with our obligations under the Leases in the future.

Each of the Leases is a “triple-net lease.” Accordingly, in addition to rent, we are required to pay among other things the following: (i) all facility maintenance, (ii) all insurance required in connection with the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties, (iii) taxes levied on or with respect to the leased properties (other than taxes on the income of the lessor) and (iv) all utilities and other services necessary or appropriate for the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties. We are responsible for incurring the costs described in the preceding sentence notwithstanding the fact that many of the benefits received in exchange for such costs shall in part accrue to GLPI as owner of the associated facilities.

In addition, if some of our leased facilities should prove to be unprofitable, we could remain obligated for lease payments and other obligations under the Leases even if we decided to withdraw from those locations. We could incur special charges relating to the closing of such facilities including lease termination costs, impairment charges and other special charges that would reduce our net income and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face risks associated with growth and acquisitions.

We regularly evaluate opportunities for growth through development of gaming operations in existing or new markets, through acquiring other gaming, hospitality and entertainment businesses or through redeveloping our existing locations. The expansion of our operations, whether through acquisitions, development or internal growth, could divert management’s attention and could also cause us to incur substantial costs, including legal, professional and consulting fees. It is uncertain that we will be able to identify, acquire, develop or profitably manage additional companies or operations or successfully integrate such companies or operations into our existing operations without substantial costs, delays or other problems. Additionally, it is uncertain that we will receive gaming or other necessary licenses or governmental approvals for our new projects or in jurisdictions that we have not operated in the past or that gaming will be approved in jurisdictions where it is not currently approved. Further, we may not obtain adequate financing for such opportunities on acceptable terms. Finally, under the terms of the Penn National Merger Agreement , we have certain restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to the completion of the

12

Table of Contents

Proposed Company Sale , including with respect to growth and acquisition opportunities which may be beneficial to the Company.

If we make new acquisitions or new investments, we may face additional risks related to our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and ability to satisfy our financial covenants and comply with other restrictive covenants under our Debt Agreements.

We derived 26.3% and 26.4% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 from our casinos located in Louisiana and Missouri, respectively, and are especially subject to certain risks, including economic and competitive risks, associated with the conditions in those areas and in the states from which we draw patrons.

Four of our sixteen gaming facilities on which we operate are located in Louisiana. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , we derived 26.3% of our revenues from these four casinos, including 13.1% from one of them, L’Auberge Lake Charles in Lake Charles, Louisiana. In addition, we derived 26.4% of our revenues from our three casinos in Missouri during the year ended December 31, 2017 .

Because we expect to derive a significant percentage of our revenues from operating facilities concentrated in two states, we are subject to greater risks from regional conditions than a gaming company operating facilities in several different geographies. A decrease in revenues from or increase in costs for any of these locations is likely to have a proportionally greater impact on our business and operations than it would for a gaming company with more geographically diverse facilities. Risks from regional conditions include the following:

regional economic conditions;

regional competitive conditions, including legalization or expansion of gaming in Louisiana or Missouri or in neighboring states;

reduced land and air travel due to increasing fuel costs or transportation disruptions;

inaccessibility of the area due to inclement weather, road construction or closure of primary access routes;

the outbreak of public health threats at any of our facilities, or in the areas in which they are located, or the perception that such threats exist; and

a decline in the number of visitors.

Our present indebtedness and projected future borrowings could adversely affect our financial health; future cash flows may not be sufficient to meet our obligations, and we may have difficulty obtaining additional financing; and we may experience adverse effects of interest rate fluctuations .

As of December 31, 2017 , we had indebtedness of $821.7 million , including $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.625% Notes, $169.2 million in borrowings under our revolving commitment under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities and $152.4 million in outstanding term loan borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities. In addition, we had $9.2 million in outstanding letters of credit under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities as of December 31, 2017 .

There can be no assurance in the future that we will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or through asset sales to meet our expected long-term debt service obligations. Our indebtedness and projected future borrowings could have important adverse consequences to us, such as:

making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our expected indebtedness (including our obligations under the 5.625% Notes, the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the Leases);

limiting our ability to obtain additional financing without restructuring the covenants in our expected indebtedness to permit the incurrence of such financing;

requiring a substantial portion of our cash flow to be used for payments on the debt (including our obligations under the 5.625% Notes, the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the Leases) and related interest (as applicable), thereby reducing our ability to use cash flow to fund other working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate requirements;

13

Table of Contents


limiting our ability to respond to changing business, industry and economic conditions and to withstand competitive pressures, which may affect our financial condition;

causing us to incur higher interest expense in the event of increases in interest rates on our borrowings that have variable interest rates or in the event of refinancing existing debt at higher interest rates;

limiting our ability to make investments, dispose of assets, pay cash dividends or repurchase stock;

increasing our vulnerability to downturns in our business, our industry or the general economy and restricting us from making improvements or acquisitions or exploring business opportunities;

placing us at a competitive disadvantage to competitors with less debt or greater resources; and

subjecting us to financial and other restrictive covenants in our indebtedness, the non-compliance with which could result in an event of default.

We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, that our anticipated revenue growth will be realized, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our Debt Agreements in amounts sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness (including our obligations under the 5.625% Notes, the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the Leases) or to fund our other liquidity needs. In addition, in the event we undertake substantial new developments or facility renovations in the future or if we consummate significant acquisitions in the future, our cash requirements and our debt service requirements may increase significantly.

If we fail to generate sufficient cash flow from future operations to meet our expected debt service obligations (including our obligations under the 5.625% Notes, the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the Leases), we may need to refinance all or a portion of our debt on or before maturity. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our debt on attractive terms, commercially reasonable terms or at all, particularly because of our anticipated high levels of debt and the debt incurrence restrictions imposed by the agreements expected to govern our debt.

Our borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities are at variable rates of interest, which could expose us to market risk from adverse changes in interest rates. While we may enter into interest rate hedges in the future, we currently have no such interest rate hedges. If interest rates increase, our debt service obligations on the variable-rate indebtedness could increase significantly even though the amount borrowed would remain the same.

Our indebtedness imposes restrictive covenants on us .

Our Debt Agreements impose various customary negative covenants on us and our restricted subsidiaries. The restrictions that are imposed by these debt instruments include, among other obligations, limitations on our and our restricted subsidiaries’ ability to:

incur additional debt;

make payments on subordinated obligations;

make dividends or distributions and repurchase stock;

make investments;

grant liens on our property to secure debt;

enter into certain transactions with affiliates;

sell assets or enter into mergers or consolidations;

create dividend and other payment restrictions affecting our subsidiaries;

change the nature of our lines of business;


14

Table of Contents

designate restricted and unrestricted subsidiaries; and

make material amendments to the Leases.

In addition, the Senior Secured Credit Facilities require us to maintain specified financial ratios and to satisfy certain financial tests, including interest coverage and maximum consolidated senior secured net leverage ratios. The Senior Secured Credit Facilities also contain certain customary affirmative covenants and events of default, which events of default include the occurrence of a change of control, revocation of material licenses by gaming authorities (subject to a cure period), termination of the Leases and a cross-default to certain events of default under the Leases. The terms of the bond indenture governing the 5.625% Notes also include customary covenants and defaults for debt issuances of that nature. Our ability to comply with the covenants contained in these instruments may be affected by general economic conditions, industry conditions, and other events beyond our control, including delay in the completion of new projects under construction. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with these covenants. Our failure to comply with the covenants contained in the Debt Agreements, including failure to comply as a result of events beyond our control, could result in an event of default under our debt instruments, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results and our financial condition. If there were an event of default under one of our debt instruments, the holders of the defaulted debt could cause all amounts outstanding with respect to that debt to be due and payable, subject to applicable grace periods. This could trigger cross-defaults under our Debt Agreements. We cannot assure you that our assets or cash flow would be sufficient to repay borrowings under our debt instruments if accelerated upon an event of default, or that we would be able to repay, refinance or restructure the payments on any of those proposed debt instruments.

To service our indebtedness and make payments under the Leases, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control.

Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, make payments under the Leases and fund planned capital expenditures and expansion efforts will depend upon our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.

We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flows from operations, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities in amounts sufficient to enable us to pay our obligations under the Leases or pay our indebtedness, as such indebtedness matures and to fund our other liquidity needs. In such circumstances, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness, at or before maturity, and cannot provide assurances that we will be able to refinance any of our expected indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. We may have to adopt one or more alternatives, such as reducing or delaying planned expenses and capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring debt, or obtaining additional equity or debt financing or joint venture partners. These financing strategies may not be completed on satisfactory terms, if at all. In addition, certain states’ laws contain restrictions on the ability of companies engaged in the gaming business to undertake certain financing transactions. Some restrictions may prevent us from obtaining necessary capital.

Our ability to obtain additional financing on commercially reasonable terms may be limited.

Although we believe that our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, as well as future cash from operations and availability under the Revolving Credit Facility, will provide adequate resources to fund ongoing operating requirements, we may need to seek additional financing to compete effectively. As a result of the Spin-Off and Merger with GLPI, Former Pinnacle sold substantially all of its real estate and as a result, we have less collateral with which we are able to secure financing in the future. This may result in us entering into debt financing terms that are more expensive and on less than ideal terms. Our debt ratings affect both our ability to raise debt financing and the cost of that financing. Future downgrades of our debt ratings may increase our borrowing costs and affect our ability to access the debt markets on terms and in amounts that would be satisfactory to us. If we are unable to obtain financing on commercially reasonable terms, it could:
 
reduce funds available to us for purposes such as working capital, capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;

restrict our ability to capitalize on business opportunities;

increase our vulnerability to economic downturns and competitive pressures in the markets in which we operate; and

place us at a competitive disadvantage.


15

Table of Contents

In the event that we undertake future development plans for capital-intensive projects, we may be required to borrow significant amounts under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities and, depending on which projects are pursued to completion, may cause us to incur substantial additional indebtedness.

We expect to fund our working capital and general corporate requirements (including our development activities) with cash flow from operations and funding from our Debt Agreements, but cannot provide assurances that such financing will provide adequate funding for our future developments. In the event that we pursue future developments and our future cash flows from operations do not match the levels we currently anticipate, whether due to downturns in the economy or otherwise, we may need to amend the terms of our credit facility or obtain waivers from our lenders in order to implement future development plans. We may not be able to obtain such an amendment or waiver from our lenders. In such event, we may need to raise funds through the capital markets and may not be able to do so on favorable terms or on terms acceptable to us.

We may experience an impairment of our goodwill, other intangible assets, or long-lived assets, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We test goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually during the fourth quarter (October 1st test date), or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. A significant amount of judgment is involved in performing fair value estimates for goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets because the results are based on estimated future cash flows and assumptions related thereto. Significant assumptions include estimates of future sales and expense trends, liquidity and capitalization, among other factors. We base our fair value estimates on projected financial information, which we believe to be reasonable. If we are required to recognize an impairment to some portion of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, it could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We review the carrying amount of our long-lived assets whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. When performing this assessment, we consider current operating results, trends and prospects, as well as the effect of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic, legal, and regulatory factors. If we are required to recognize an impairment to some portion of the carrying amount of our long-lived assets, it could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Insufficient or lower-than-expected results generated from our new developments and acquisitions may negatively affect our operating results and financial condition.

We cannot assure you that the revenues generated from our new developments and acquisitions, such as our acquisition of the Meadows in September 2016, will be sufficient to pay related expenses if and when these developments and acquisitions are completed, or, even if revenues are sufficient to pay expenses, that the new developments and acquisitions will yield an adequate return or any return on our significant investments. In particular, achieving the anticipated synergies of any transaction, is subject to a number of uncertainties, including whether an acquired business can be integrated in an efficient and effective manner. It is possible that the integration process with respect to an acquired business could take longer than anticipated and could result in the loss of valuable employees, the disruption of our ongoing business, processes and systems or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, practices, policies and compensation arrangements. In addition, our projects, if completed, may take significantly longer than we expect to generate returns, if any. Moreover, lower-than-expected results from the opening of a new facility may negatively affect our operating results and financial condition and may make it more difficult to raise capital, even as such a shortfall would increase the need to raise capital. In addition, as new facilities on which we operate open, they may compete with the existing facilities which we own or operate.

Rising operating costs at our operations could have a negative impact on our business.

The operating expenses associated with our operations could increase due to, among other reasons, the following factors:

changes in the foreign, federal, state or local tax or regulations, including state gaming regulations or taxes, could impose additional restrictions or increase our operating costs;

aggressive marketing and promotional campaigns by our competitors for an extended period of time could force us to increase our expenditures for marketing and promotional campaigns in order to maintain our existing customer base and attract new customers;


16

Table of Contents

as our facilities age, we may need to increase our expenditures for repairs, maintenance, and to replace equipment necessary to operate our business in amounts greater than what we have spent historically;

the Master Lease requires us to pay variable rent and base rent, and base rent is composed of building base rent and land base rent. Every year of the Master Lease term, building base rent is subject to an annual escalation of up to 2% and may increase without a corresponding increase in revenues. Our annual variable rent is based on changes in our net revenue and as our revenues increase, our variable rent may increase without a corresponding increase in our profits;

the Meadows Lease requires us to pay percentage rent and base rent. Every year of the initial term of the Meadows Lease, our base rent is subject to an annual escalation of up to 5% with each year thereafter subject to an annual escalation of up to 2% and may increase without a corresponding increase in revenues. After the first two years of the Meadows Lease and each two years thereafter, the percentage rent is based on changes in the Meadows’ average net revenue for the trailing two-lease-year period and as our Meadows’ net revenues increase, our percentage rent under the Meadows Lease may increase without a corresponding increase in the Meadows’ profits;

an increase in the cost of health care benefits for our employees could have a negative impact on our financial results;

our reliance on slot play revenues and any additional costs imposed on us from vendors;

availability and cost of the many products and service we provide our customers, including food, beverages, retail items, entertainment, hotel rooms, spa and golf services;

availability and costs associated with insurance;

increase in costs of labor, including due to potential unionization of our employees;

our facilities use significant amounts of electricity, natural gas and other forms of energy, and energy price increase may adversely affect our cost structure; and

our facilities use significant amounts of water, and a water shortage may adversely affect our operations.

If our operating expenses increase without any offsetting increase in our revenues, our results of operations would suffer.

Our slots and table games hold percentages may fluctuate.

The gaming industry is characterized by an element of chance and our casino guests’ winnings depend on a variety of factors, some of which are beyond our control. In addition to the element of chance, hold percentages are affected by other factors, including players’ skill and experience, the mix of games played, the financial resources of players, the volume of bets placed and the amount of time played. The variability of our hold percentages have the potential to adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Recessions have affected our business and financial condition, and economic conditions may continue to affect us in ways that we currently cannot accurately predict.

Economic recessions have had and may continue to have far reaching adverse consequences across many industries, including the gaming industry, which may have an effect on our business and financial condition. The U.S. economy experienced some weakness following a severe recession, which resulted in increased unemployment, decreased consumer spending and a decline in housing values. In addition, while the Federal Reserve took policy actions to promote market liquidity and encourage economic growth following the recession, such actions are now being curtailed as signs of improvement in the economy have emerged, and the impact of these monetary policy actions on the recovery is uncertain. Moreover, we rely on the strength of regional and local economies for the performance of each of our properties. If the national economic recovery slows or stalls, the national economy experiences another recession or any of the relevant regional or local economies suffers a downturn, we may experience a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.    


17

Table of Contents

We expect to be engaged from time to time in one or more construction and development projects, and many factors could prevent us from completing them as planned, including the escalation of construction costs beyond increments anticipated in our construction budgets.

Construction of major buildings has certain inherent risks, including the risks of fire, structural collapse, human error and electrical, mechanical and plumbing malfunction. In addition, projects entail additional risks related to structural heights and the required use of cranes. Our expected development and expansion projects also entail significant risks, including:

shortage of materials;

shortage of skilled labor or work stoppages;

unforeseen construction scheduling, engineering, excavation, environmental or geological problems;

natural disasters, hurricanes, weather interference, changes in river levels, floods, fires, earthquakes or other casualty losses or delays;

unanticipated cost increase or delays in completing the project;

delays in obtaining or inability to obtain or maintain necessary license or permits;

changes to plans or specifications;

performance by contractors and subcontractors;

disputes with contractors;

disruption of our operations caused by diversion of management’s attention to new development projects and construction at our existing facilities;

remediation of environmental contamination at some of our proposed construction sites, which may prove more costly than anticipated in our construction budgets;

failure to obtain and maintain necessary gaming regulatory approvals and licenses, or failure to obtain such approvals and licenses on a timely basis;

requirements or government-established “goals” concerning union labor or requiring that a portion of the project expenditures be through companies controlled by specific ethnic or gender groups, goals that may not be obtainable, or may only be obtainable at additional project cost; and

increases in the cost of raw materials for construction, driven by worldwide demand, higher labor and construction costs and other factors, may cause price increases beyond those anticipated in the budgets for our development projects.

Escalating construction costs may cause us to modify the design and scope of projects from those initially contemplated or cause the budgets for those projects to be increased. We will generally carry insurance to cover certain liabilities related to construction, but not all risks are covered, and it is uncertain whether such insurance will provide sufficient payment in a timely fashion even for those risks that are insured and material to us.

Construction of our development projects exposes us to risks of cost overruns due to typical construction uncertainties associated with any project or changes in the designs, plans or concepts of such projects. For these and other reasons, construction costs may exceed the estimated cost of completion, notwithstanding the existence of any guaranteed maximum price construction contracts.

Our industry is highly regulated, which makes us dependent on obtaining and maintaining gaming licenses and subjects us to potentially significant fines and penalties.

The ownership, management and operation of gaming facilities are subject to extensive state and local regulation. The statutes, rules and regulations of the states and local jurisdictions in which we and our subsidiaries conduct gaming operations

18

Table of Contents

require us to hold various licenses, registrations, permits and approvals and to obtain findings of suitability. The various regulatory authorities, including the Colorado Division of Gaming, the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission, Indiana Gaming Commission, the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission, the Louisiana Gaming Control Board, the Mississippi Gaming Commission, the Missouri Gaming Commission, the Nevada Gaming Control Board, the Nevada Gaming Commission, the Ohio State Racing Commission, the Ohio Lottery Commission, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, the Pennsylvania Harness Racing Commission and the Texas Racing Commission may, among other things, limit, condition, suspend, revoke or fail to renew a license to conduct gaming operations or prevent us from owning the securities of any of our gaming subsidiaries for any cause deemed reasonable by such licensing authorities. Substantial fines or forfeitures of assets for violations of gaming laws or regulations may be levied against us, our subsidiaries and the persons involved, including, but not limited to, our management, employees and holders of 5% or more of our securities. In addition, many of our key vendors must be licensed and found suitable by regulatory authorities and there can be no assurance that such vendors will be able to be licensed and found suitable.

To date, we have obtained all governmental licenses, findings of suitability, registrations, permits and approvals necessary for the operation of our existing gaming facilities. It is uncertain, however, whether we will be able to obtain any new licenses, registrations, permits, approvals and findings of suitability that may be required in the future or that existing ones will be renewed or will not be suspended or revoked. Any expansion of our gaming operations in our existing jurisdictions or into new jurisdictions may require various additional licenses, findings of suitability, registrations, permits and approvals of the gaming authorities. The approval process can be time consuming and costly, and there can be no assurance of success.

We will also be subject to a variety of other rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, laws and regulations governing payment card information and the serving of alcoholic beverages at our operating facilities. If we are not in compliance with these laws, it could adversely affect our business.

Potential changes in the regulatory environment could harm our business.

Changes in regulations affecting the casino business can affect our operations. In addition, legislators and special-interest groups have proposed legislation from time to time that would restrict or prevent gaming operations. Other regulatory restrictions or prohibitions on our gaming operations could curtail our operations and could result in decreases in revenues.

Our business may be adversely affected by legislation prohibiting tobacco smoking.

Legislation in various forms to ban indoor tobacco smoking in public places has been enacted or introduced in many states and local jurisdictions, including several of the jurisdictions in which we operate. We believe the smoking bans and restrictions have significantly impacted business volumes.

In January 2015, the New Orleans City Council unanimously approved an ordinance in the City of New Orleans that prohibits smoking in casinos, bars and restaurants. The Boomtown New Orleans facility is located in the City of Harvey and not in the City of New Orleans, so the smoking ban does not apply to such facility. However, if a smoking ban was approved in the City of Harvey, we believe that this will adversely affect our business.

In August 2017, the East Baton Rouge Metropolitan Council approved a smoking ban in casinos and bars that will take effect in June 2018. We believe that this smoking ban will adversely affect our business at L’Auberge Baton Rouge.
Our operations are largely dependent on the skill and experience of our management and key personnel. The loss of management and other key personnel could significantly harm our business, and we may not be able to effectively replace members of management who have left our company.
Our success and our competitive position are largely dependent upon, among other things, the efforts and skills of our senior executives and management team. Although we enter into employment agreements with certain of our senior executives and key personnel, we cannot guarantee that these individuals will remain employed by us. If we lose the services of any members of our management team or other key personnel, our business may be significantly impaired. We cannot assure you that we will be able to retain our existing senior executive and management personnel or attract additional qualified senior executive and management personnel.
 
We expect to experience strong competition in hiring and retaining qualified property and corporate management personnel, including competition from numerous Native American gaming facilities that are not subject to the same taxation regimes as we are and therefore may be willing and able to pay higher rates of compensation. From time to time, we expect to have a number of vacancies in key corporate and property management positions. If we are unable to successfully recruit and

19

Table of Contents

retain qualified management personnel at our facilities or at our corporate level, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

In addition, our officers, directors and key employees are required to file applications with the gaming authorities in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate and are required to be licensed or found suitable by these gaming authorities. If the gaming authorities were to find an officer, director or key employee unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to continue having a relationship with us, we would have to sever all relationships with that person. Furthermore, the gaming authorities may require us to terminate the employment of any person who refuses to file appropriate applications. Either result could significantly impair our operations.

Adverse weather conditions, road construction, gasoline shortages and other factors affecting our facilities and the areas in which we operate could make it more difficult for potential customers to travel to the facilities on which we operate and deter customers from visiting our facilities.

Our business depends upon our ability to draw customers from each of the geographic markets in which we operate. Adverse weather conditions or road construction can deter our customers from traveling to the facilities on which we operate or make it difficult for them to frequent the facilities on which we operate. In 2015, Boomtown Bossier City and Belterra Park both experienced flooding which resulted in temporary closures at both properties, repair and clean-up costs and lost business volume. In 2016, L’Auberge Lake Charles and L’Auberge Baton Rouge were both negatively impacted by lost business volume due to severe rain and flooding. In 2017, visitation to Boomtown New Orleans, L’Auberge Lake Charles and L’Auberge Baton Rouge was negatively impacted by Hurricanes Harvey and Nate. Moreover, gasoline shortages or fuel price increases in regions that constitute a significant source of customers for the facilities on which we operate could make it more difficult for potential customers to travel to such facilities and deter customers from visiting. The dockside gaming facilities in Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi and Missouri, as well as any additional riverboat or dockside casino facilities that might be developed or acquired, are also subject to risks, in addition to those associated with land-based casinos, which could disrupt our operations. Although none of the vessels on which we operate leave their moorings in normal operations, there are risks associated with the movement or mooring of vessels on waterways, including risks of casualty due to river turbulence, flooding, collisions with other vessels and severe weather conditions.

Our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected by the occurrence of natural disasters, such as hurricanes, or other catastrophic events, including war and terrorism.

Natural disasters, such as major hurricanes, typhoons, floods, fires and earthquakes, could adversely affect our business and operating results. Hurricanes are common in the areas in which our Louisiana operations are located, and the severity of such natural disasters is unpredictable. The facilities where we operate in St. Louis (River City and Ameristar St. Charles) are located near an earthquake fault line and are subject to earthquakes. In addition, the River City casino is in an area along the Mississippi River that has historically experienced flooding. Although its foundation is built up to be above historical flooding levels, there is no certainty that this will be sufficient in future floods.

For example, in 2005, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita caused significant damage in the Gulf Coast region. Hurricane Katrina destroyed Former Pinnacle’s former Biloxi, Mississippi facility. In August 2005, the Boomtown New Orleans casino on which we operate was forced to close for 34 days as a result of Hurricane Katrina. In 2015, Boomtown Bossier City and Belterra Park both experienced flooding, which resulted in temporary closures at both properties. In 2016, L’Auberge Lake Charles and L’Auberge Baton Rouge were both negatively impacted by lost business volume due to severe rain and flooding. In 2017, visitation to Boomtown New Orleans, L’Auberge Lake Charles and L’Auberge Baton Rouge was negatively impacted by Hurricanes Harvey and Nate.

Catastrophic events, such as terrorist attacks in the United States and elsewhere, have had a negative effect on travel and leisure expenditures, including lodging, gaming (in some jurisdictions) and tourism. We cannot accurately predict the extent to which such events may affect us, directly or indirectly, in the future. We also cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain or choose to purchase any insurance coverage with respect to occurrences of terrorist acts and any losses that could result from these acts. If there is a prolonged disruption at our facilities due to natural disasters, terrorist attacks or other catastrophic events, our results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.

20

Table of Contents

We are exposed to a variety of natural disasters such as named windstorms, floods and earthquakes and this can make it challenging for us to obtain adequate levels of weather catastrophe occurrence insurance coverage for our facilities at reasonable rates, if at all.
Because of significant historical loss experience and the potential for future similar losses caused by hurricanes and other natural disasters, adequate insurance may be limited or may be cost prohibitive. Therefore, our policy contains sub-limits specifically for weather catastrophe occurrences. Our coverage for a named windstorm, flood, earthquake or act of terrorism is $200 million per occurrence, subject to a deductible, including business interruption. For other catastrophes, our coverage is $700 million per occurrence, subject to a deductible, including business interruption. In addition, as a result of the worldwide economic conditions, there may be uncertainty as to the viability of certain insurance companies and their ability to pay a claim. While we believe that the insurance companies will remain solvent, there is no certainty that this will be the case in the event of a loss.
We may incur property and other losses that are not adequately covered by insurance, which may harm our results of operations.
Although we maintain insurance that our management believes is customary and appropriate for our business, we cannot assure you that insurance will be available or adequate to cover all losses and damage to which our business or our assets might be subjected. The lack of adequate insurance for certain types or levels of risk could expose us to significant losses in the event that a catastrophe occurred for which we are uninsured or underinsured. Any losses we incur that are not adequately covered by insurance may decrease our future operating income, require us to find replacements or repairs for destroyed property and reduce the funds available for payments of our obligations. The Leases require us, in the event of a casualty event, to rebuild a leased property to substantially the same condition as existed immediately before such casualty event. We renew our insurance policies (other than our builder’s risk insurance) on an annual basis. The cost of coverage may become so material that we may need to further reduce our policy limits, further increase our deductibles, or agree to certain exclusions from our coverage.

The concentration and evolution of the slot machine manufacturing industry or other technological conditions could impose additional costs on us.

A substantial majority of our revenues is attributable to slot machines operated by us at our casinos. It is important that, for competitive reasons, we offer the most popular and up-to-date slot machine games with the latest technology to our guests.
In recent years, the prices of new slot machines with additional features have escalated faster than the general rate of inflation. Furthermore, in recent years, slot machine manufacturers have frequently refused to sell slot machines featuring the most popular games, instead requiring participation lease arrangements in order to acquire the machines. Participation slot machine leasing arrangements typically require the payment of a fixed daily rental. Such agreements may also include a percentage payment of coin-in or net win. Generally, a participation lease is substantially more expensive over the long-term than the cost to purchase a new machine.
 
For competitive reasons, we may choose to purchase new slot machines or enter into participation lease arrangements that are more expensive than the costs associated with the continued operation of our existing slot machines. If the newer slot machines do not result in sufficient incremental revenues to offset the increased investment and participation lease costs, it could hurt our profitability.

We materially rely on a variety of hardware and software products to maximize revenue and efficiency in our operations. Technology in the gaming industry is developing rapidly, and we may need to invest substantial amounts to acquire the most current gaming and hotel technology and equipment in order to remain competitive in the markets in which we operate. Ensuring the successful implementation and maintenance of any new technology acquired is an additional risk.

We operate in a highly taxed industry and it may be subject to higher taxes in the future. If the jurisdictions in which we operate increase gaming taxes and fees, our operating results could be adversely affected.

In gaming jurisdictions in which we operate, state and local governments raise considerable revenues from taxes based on casino revenues and operations. We also pay property taxes, admission taxes, occupancy taxes, sales and use taxes, payroll taxes, franchise taxes and income taxes. Our profitability depends on generating enough revenues to pay gaming taxes and other largely variable expenses, such as payroll and marketing, as well as largely fixed expenses, such as property taxes and interest expense. From time to time, state and local governments have increased gaming taxes and such increases can significantly impact the profitability of gaming operations. For example, on October 30, 2017, Pennsylvania increased gaming taxes, which will adversely impact the Meadows.

21

Table of Contents


We cannot assure you that governments in jurisdictions in which we operate, or the federal government, will not enact legislation that increases gaming tax rates. Global economic pressures have reduced the revenues of state governments from traditional tax sources, which may cause state legislatures or the federal government to be more inclined to increase gaming tax rates.
Work stoppages, organizing drives and other labor problems could negatively impact our future profits.

We are a party to certain collective bargaining agreements, including one collective bargaining agreement at Belterra Park, one collective bargaining agreement at Ameristar East Chicago and four collective bargaining agreements at the Meadows. In addition, other unions have approached our employees. A lengthy strike or other work stoppages at any of our casino facilities or future construction projects could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Labor unions are making a concerted effort to recruit more employees in the gaming industry. We cannot provide any assurance that we will not experience additional and more aggressive union activity in the future.

We face environmental and archaeological regulation of the real estate on which we operate.

Our business is subject to a variety of federal, state and local governmental statutes and regulations relating to activities or operations that may have adverse environmental effects, such as discharges to air and water and use, storage, discharge, emission and disposal of hazardous materials and concentrated animal feeding operations. These laws and regulations are complex, and subject to change, and failure to comply with such laws could result in the imposition of severe penalties or restrictions on our operations by government agencies or courts of law or the incurrence of significant costs for the remediation of spills, disposals or other releases of hazardous or toxic substances or wastes. Under certain of these laws and regulations, and under our contractual arrangements with GLPI, including the Leases, a current or previous owner or operator of property may be liable for the costs of remediating contamination on its property, without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or caused, the presence of the contaminants, and regardless of whether the practices that resulted in the contamination were legal at the time that they occurred. We endeavor to maintain compliance with environmental laws, but from time to time, current or historical operations on, or adjacent to, our property may have resulted or may result in noncompliance with environmental laws or liability for cleanup pursuant to environmental laws. A material fine or penalty, severe operational or development restriction, or imposition of material remediation costs could adversely affect our business. In addition, the locations of our current or future developments may coincide with sites containing archaeologically significant artifacts, such as Native American remains and artifacts. Federal, state and local governmental regulations relating to the protection of such sites may require us to modify, delay or cancel construction projects at significant cost to us.

We are subject to litigation, which, if adversely determined, could cause us to incur substantial losses.

From time to time during the normal course of operating our businesses, we are subject to various litigation claims and legal disputes. Some of the litigation claims may not be covered under our insurance policies, or our insurance carriers may seek to deny coverage. As a result, we might also be required to incur significant legal fees, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial position. In addition, because we cannot accurately predict the outcome of any action, it is possible that, as a result of current and/or future litigation, we will be subject to adverse judgments or settlements that could significantly reduce our earnings or result in losses.

We are subject to certain federal, state and other regulations.

We are subject to certain federal, state and local environmental laws, regulations and ordinances that apply to businesses generally, The Bank Secrecy Act, enforced by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) of the U.S. Treasury Department, requires us to report currency transactions in excess of $10,000 occurring within a gaming day, including identification of the guest by name and social security number, to the IRS. This regulation also requires us to report certain suspicious activity, including any transaction that exceeds $5,000 that we know, suspect or have reason to believe involves funds from illegal activity or is designed to evade federal regulations or reporting requirements and to verify sources of funds, in response to which we have implemented Know Your Customer processes. Periodic audits by the IRS and our internal audit department assess compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act, and substantial penalties can be imposed against us if we fail to comply with this regulation. In recent years the U.S. Treasury Department has increased its focus on Bank Secrecy Act compliance throughout the gaming industry, and public comments by FinCEN suggest that casinos should obtain information on each customer’s sources of income. This could impact our ability to attract and retain casino guests.

The riverboats on which we operate must comply with certain federal and state laws and regulations with respect to boat design, on-board facilities, equipment, personnel and safety. In addition, we are required to have third parties periodically

22

Table of Contents

inspect and certify all of our casino barges for stability and single compartment flooding integrity. The casino barges on which we operate also must meet local fire safety standards. We would incur additional costs if any of the gaming facilities on which we operate were not in compliance with one or more of these regulations.

We are also subject to a variety of other federal, state and local laws and regulations, including those relating to zoning, construction, land use, employment, marketing and advertising and the production, sale and service of alcoholic beverages. If we are not in compliance with these laws and regulations, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The imposition of a substantial penalty could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Climate change, climate change regulations and greenhouse effects may adversely impact our operations and markets.

There is a growing political and scientific consensus that greenhouse gas emissions, also referred to herein as “GHG” continue to alter the composition of the global atmosphere in ways that are affecting and are expected to continue affecting the global climate. Climate change, including the impact of global warming, creates physical and financial risk. Physical risks from climate change include an increase in sea level and changes in weather conditions, such as an increase in changes in precipitation and extreme weather events. Climate change could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. We have described the risks to us associated with extreme weather events in the risk factors above.

We may become subject to legislation and regulation regarding climate change, and compliance with any new rules could be difficult and costly. Concerned parties, such as legislators and regulators, stockholders and nongovernmental organizations, as well as companies in many business sectors, are considering ways to reduce GHG emissions. Many states have announced or adopted programs to stabilize and reduce GHG emissions and in the past federal legislation have been proposed in Congress. If such legislation is enacted, we could incur increased energy, environmental and other costs and capital expenditures to comply with the limitations. Unless and until legislation is enacted and its terms are known, we cannot reasonably or reliably estimate its impact on our financial condition, operating performance or ability to compete. Further, regulation of GHG emissions may limit our guests’ ability to travel to our facilities as a result of increased fuel costs or restrictions on transport related emissions.

We face business and regulatory risks associated with our investment in ACDL.

PNK Development 18, LLC, one of our wholly-owned unrestricted subsidiaries, owns a minority interest in Asian Coast Development (Canada) Ltd., a British Columbia corporation (“ACDL”). Entities affiliated with Harbinger Capital Partners (“Harbinger”) are the majority shareholders of ACDL. ACDL’s wholly-owned subsidiary Ho Tram Project Company Limited (“HTP”) is the owner and developer of the Ho Tram Strip beachfront complex of destination integrated resorts, residential developments and golf course in the Province of Ba Ria-Vung Tau in southern Vietnam (the “Ho Tram Strip”). As a minority shareholder of ACDL, our ability to control the management, record keeping, operations and decision-making of ACDL is limited. We fully impaired the value of our investment in ACDL in the first quarter 2013.
HTP’s operations are subject to the significant business, economic, regulatory and competitive uncertainties and contingencies frequently encountered by new businesses in new gaming jurisdictions and other risks associated with this investment, many of which are beyond ACDL’s, HTP’s or our control. The gaming elements of the businesses are subject to regulation by the government of Vietnam and uncertainty exists as to how such regulation will affect HTP’s gaming operations. Because ACDL and HTP have limited operating history, it may be more difficult for them to prepare for and respond to these types of risks than for a company with an established business and operating cash flow.
ACDL has operations outside the United States, which expose us to complex foreign and U.S. regulations inherent in doing business in Vietnam. We are subject to regulations imposed by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”), and other anti-corruption laws that generally prohibit U.S. companies and their intermediaries from offering, promising, authorizing or making improper payments to foreign government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Violations of the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws may result in severe criminal and civil sanctions as well as other penalties. The SEC and U.S. Department of Justice in recent years have increased their enforcement activities with respect to the FCPA.
Internal control policies and procedures and the compliance program that ACDL has implemented to deter prohibited practices may not be effective in prohibiting its employees, contractors or agents from violating or circumventing our policies and the law. If ACDL’s or our employees or agents fail to comply with applicable laws or company policies governing ACDL’s international operations, we and our subsidiaries may face investigations, prosecutions and other legal and regulatory proceedings and actions which could result in civil penalties, administrative remedies and criminal sanctions which could, in

23

Table of Contents

turn, serve as the basis for the initiation of like proceedings by gaming regulators in one or more of the states wherein we and our subsidiaries hold gaming licenses. Any determination that we have violated the FCPA could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and on the gaming licenses and approvals held by us and our subsidiaries.
Compliance with international and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to ACDL’s international operations increases the cost of doing business in foreign jurisdictions. ACDL will also deal with significant amounts of cash in its operations and will be subject to various reporting and anti-money laundering regulations. Any violation of anti-money laundering laws or regulations by ACDL could have a negative effect on us.

We are subject to extensive governmental regulations that impose restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our securities.

We are subject to extensive governmental regulations that relate to our current or future gaming operations and that impose certain restriction on the ownership and transfer of our securities.

In addition, we may be required by gaming authority to redeem shares of our common stock in the event that a stockholder is deemed to be unsuitable by a gaming regulatory authority. Our certificate of incorporation requires that if a person owns or controls our securities, including shares of our common stock, and is determined by a gaming authority to be unsuitable to own or control such securities or in the sole discretion of our Board of Directors is deemed likely to jeopardize our right to conduct gaming activities in any of the jurisdictions in which we conduct or intend to conduct gaming activities, we may redeem, and we may be required by a gaming authority to redeem, such person’s securities to the extent required by the government gaming authority or deemed necessary or advisable by us.

If a gaming authority requires us, or if we deem it necessary or advisable, to redeem such securities, we will serve notice on the holder who holds securities subject to redemption and will call for the redemption of the securities of such holder at a redemption price equal to that required to be paid by the gaming authority making the finding of unsuitability, or if such gaming authority does not require a certain price per share to be paid, a sum deemed reasonable by us, which in our discretion may be the original purchase price, the then current trading price of the securities or another price we determine. Unless the gaming authority requires otherwise, the redemption price will in no event exceed:

the closing sales price of the securities on the national securities exchange on which such shares are then listed on the date the notice of redemption is delivered to the person who has been determined to be unsuitable, or

if such shares are not then listed for trading on any national securities exchange, then the closing sales price of such shares as quoted in NASDAQ National Market System, or

if the shares are not then so quoted, then the mean between the representative bid and the ask price as quoted by NASDAQ or another generally recognized reporting system.
 
The redemption price may be paid in cash, by promissory note, or both, as required by the applicable gaming authority and, if not so required, as we elect. Any promissory note shall contain such terms and conditions as our Board of Directors determines necessary or advisable to comply with any applicable law or regulation or to prevent a default under any of our Debt Agreements. Subject to the foregoing, the principal amount of the promissory note together with any unpaid interest shall be due and payable no later than the tenth anniversary of delivery of the note and interest on the unpaid principal thereof shall be payable annually in arrears at the rate of 2% per annum.

Beginning on the date that a gaming authority serves notice of a determination of unsuitability or the loss or threatened loss of a gaming license upon us, and until the securities owned or controlled by the unsuitable person are owned or controlled by persons found by such gaming authority to be suitable to own them, it is unlawful for the unsuitable person or any affiliate of such person (i) to receive any dividend, payment, distribution or interest with regard to the securities, (ii) to exercise, directly or indirectly or through any proxy, trustee, or nominee, any voting or other right conferred by such securities, and such securities shall not for any purposes be included in our securities entitled to vote, or (iii) to receive any remuneration in any form from the corporation or an affiliated company for services rendered or otherwise.

From and after the date of redemption, such securities will no longer be deemed to be outstanding and all rights of the person who was determined to be unsuitable, other than the right to receive the redemption price, will cease. Such person must surrender the certificates for any securities to be redeemed in accordance with the requirements of the redemption notice.


24

Table of Contents

All persons owning or controlling securities of the Company and any affiliated companies must comply with all requirements of the gaming laws in each gaming jurisdiction in which we or any of our affiliated companies conduct or intend to conduct gaming activities. All securities of the Company must be held subject to the requirements of such gaming laws, including any requirement that (i) the holder file applications for gaming licenses with, or provide information to, applicable gaming authorities, or (ii) that any transfer of such securities may be subject to prior approval by gaming authorities, and any transfer of our securities in violation of any such approval requirement are not permitted and the purported transfer is void ab initio.

Ownership and transfer of our securities could be subjected at any time to additional or more restrictive regulations, including regulation in applicable jurisdictions where there are no current restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our securities or in new jurisdictions where we may conduct our operations in the future. A detailed description of such regulations, including the requirements under gaming laws of the jurisdictions in which we operate, can be found in Exhibit 99.1, “Government Regulation and Gaming Issues,” to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The market price for our common stock may be volatile, and you may not be able to sell our stock at a favorable price or at all.

Many factors could cause the market price of our common stock to rise and fall, including:

market expectations regarding the Proposed Company Sale , including the timing and likelihood of the completion of the Proposed Company Sale and fluctuations in the market price of Penn National ’s common stock;

actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly results of operations;

change in market valuations of companies in our industry;

change in expectations of future financial performance;

regulatory changes;

fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes;

issuance of common stock market prices and volumes;

issuance of common stock or other securities in the future;

the addition or departure of key personnel; and

announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, investments, dispositions, joint ventures or other significant business decisions.

In addition, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to companies’ operating performance. Broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following the announcement of transactions such as the Proposed Company Sale or following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, shareholder derivative lawsuits and/or securities class action litigation has often been instituted against that company. Such litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.


25

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”) provides certain “safe harbor” provisions for forward-looking statements. Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters addressed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as in other reports filed with or furnished to the SEC or statements made by us, may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. From time to time, we may provide oral or written forward-looking statements in our other periodic reports on Form 10-Q, Form 8-K, press releases and other materials released to the public. All forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and any documents we incorporate by reference are made pursuant to the Act. Words such as, but not limited to, “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “could,” “may,” “will,” “should,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements, which may include, without limitation, statements regarding the Proposed Company Sale and the Penn National Merger Agreement , the consummation of the Proposed Company Sale and the timing thereof, the ability of the Company and Penn National to receive stockholder approvals for the transaction, the ability of the Company and Penn National to obtain required regulatory approvals, the stock price of the Company and Penn National following the consummation of a transaction with Penn National , the expected results of operations and future operating performance and future growth; adequacy of resources to fund development and expansion projects; liquidity, financing options, including the state of the capital markets and our ability to access the capital markets; the state of the credit markets and economy; cash needs; cash reserves; operating and capital expenses; expense reductions; the sufficiency of insurance coverage; anticipated marketing costs at various projects; the future outlook of Pinnacle and the gaming industry and pending regulatory and legal matters; the potential occurrence of impairments to goodwill, other intangible assets or long-lived assets; extreme weather conditions or climate change; potential work stoppages or other labor problems; cyber security risks; the ability of the Company to continue to meet its financial and other covenants governing the Debt Agreements and the Leases; the Company’s anticipated future capital expenditures; ability to implement strategies to improve revenues and operating margins at the Company’s properties; reduce costs and debt; the Company’s ability to successfully implement marketing programs to increase revenue at the Company’s properties; and the Company’s ability to improve operations and performance, are all subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by us. This can occur as a result of inaccurate assumptions or as a consequence of known or unknown risks and uncertainties. For more information on the potential factors that could affect our operating results and financial condition in addition to the risk factors described above, review our other filings (other than any portion of such filings that are furnished under applicable SEC rules rather than filed) with the SEC.

All forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are made only as of the date of this Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
None.

Item 2.
Properties

The following describes the principal real estate associated with our businesses by segment:

Midwest

Ameristar Council Bluffs: Ameristar Council Bluffs is located on approximately 58 acres along the east bank of the Missouri River in Council Bluffs, Iowa. We lease the real estate at this site under the terms of the Master Lease. We sublease approximately one acre of the site to a third party for the operation of a 188-room limited service Holiday Inn Suites Hotel and a 96-room Hampton Inn Hotel.

Ameristar East Chicago: Ameristar East Chicago is located on approximately 22 acres in East Chicago, Indiana, approximately 25 miles from downtown Chicago, Illinois. We lease the casino vessel, hotel and other improvements on the site under the terms of the Master Lease and the land under the terms of the Master Lease and a ground lease.

Ameristar Kansas City: Ameristar Kansas City is located on approximately 215 acres of land in Kansas City, Missouri. We lease the casino vessel, hotel and other improvements on the site under the terms of the Master Lease and we lease the land under the terms of the Master Lease and a ground lease. In addition, there are approximately 37 acres of undeveloped wetlands. The site is east of and adjacent to Interstate 435 along the north bank of the Missouri River.


26

Table of Contents

Ameristar St. Charles: Ameristar St. Charles is located on approximately 59 acres of land along the west bank of the Missouri River immediately north of Interstate 70 in St. Charles, Missouri. In addition, there are approximately 181 acres of undeveloped land held for possible future wetlands remediation. The real estate at this site is leased under the terms of the Master Lease.

Belterra Resort: We lease the real estate used in the operations of Belterra Resort under the terms of the Master Lease and a ground lease. Belterra Resort occupies approximately 315 acres in Florence, Indiana and includes a 54-room hotel on six acres of land approximately 10 miles from Belterra Resort.

Belterra Park: Belterra Park is located on approximately 160 acres of land, of which, approximately 40 acres are undeveloped, that we own in southeast Cincinnati, Ohio. Additionally, we own the buildings and building improvements associated with the facility.

Meadows: We lease the real estate used in the operations of the Meadows, located on approximately 153 acres of land under the terms of the Meadows Lease. The Meadows is located in Washington, Pennsylvania, approximately 25 miles south of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The Meadows also offers off-track betting at a separate facility we lease in Pittsburgh.

River City: We lease the real estate used in the operations of River City under the terms of the Master Lease and a ground lease. The River City site is located on approximately 56 acres in south St. Louis County, approximately 12 miles south of downtown St. Louis.

South

Ameristar Vicksburg: Ameristar Vicksburg is located on a total of approximately 74 acres of land in Vicksburg, Mississippi, on either side of Washington Street near Interstate 20. In addition to the gaming and hotel facilities, we operate a recreational vehicle park and utilize buildings for warehousing and support services also located on these parcels. We lease the real estate at this location under the terms of the Master Lease.

Boomtown Bossier City: Boomtown Bossier City is located on approximately 23 acres in Bossier City, Louisiana on the banks of the Red River. We lease the real estate at this site, including the dockside riverboat casino, under the terms of the Master Lease and lease approximately one acre of water bottoms.

Boomtown New Orleans: Boomtown New Orleans is located in Harvey, Louisiana on approximately 54 acres. The land, facilities, and associated improvements at the property, including the dockside riverboat casino and hotel, are leased under the terms of the Master Lease.

L’Auberge Baton Rouge: L’Auberge Baton Rouge is located approximately 10 miles south of downtown Baton Rouge, Louisiana. We lease the real estate of the L’Auberge Baton Rouge property under the terms of the Master Lease, which includes approximately 99 acres and the casino facility. Additionally, we own approximately 478 acres of excess land adjacent to L’Auberge Baton Rouge, which is available for future expansion and development.

L’Auberge Lake Charles: L’Auberge Lake Charles is located in Lake Charles, Louisiana, approximately 140 miles from Houston and approximately 300 miles and 335 miles from Austin, Texas and San Antonio, Texas, respectively. We lease approximately 235 acres of land; upon which the L’Auberge Lake Charles property is located; the casino facility; and other real estate improvements under the terms of the Master Lease and a ground lease. Additionally, we own approximately 54 acres of excess land surrounding the site, which is available for future expansion and development.

West

Ameristar Black Hawk: Ameristar Black Hawk is located on a site of approximately six acres on the north side of Colorado Highway 119 in Black Hawk, Colorado. Under the terms of the Master Lease, we lease the real estate of Ameristar Black Hawk, including the land underlying the casino facility, and other property in the vicinity, including approximately 100 acres of largely hillside land across Richman Street from the casino site, portions of which are used for overflow parking, administrative offices and other operational uses.

Cactus Petes and Horseshu: Cactus Petes and Horseshu are located in Jackpot, Nevada, across from each other on either side of U.S. Highway 93. We lease the real estate at both locations and other property in the vicinity under the terms of the Master Lease, which includes approximately 34 acres for Cactus Petes, approximately 20 acres for Horseshu, and

27

Table of Contents

approximately 26 acres for a service station and 288 housing units that support the primary operations of the Jackpot Properties.

Other

We lease office and warehouse space in various locations outside of our operating properties, including our corporate offices in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Our real property interests at Belterra Park, the excess land at L’Auberge Baton Rouge and L’Auberge Lake Charles, and the leasehold interests for the properties described above collateralize our obligations under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities.

Item 3.
Legal Proceedings

We are a party to a number of pending legal proceedings. Management does not expect that the outcome of such proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

28

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.
Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information: Our common stock has been listed and quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC under the symbol “PNK” since April 29, 2016, the first day following the closing of the Spin-Off and Merger. In connection with the Merger, the common stock of Former Pinnacle ceased being listed and quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (also under the symbol “PNK”). The last trading day of Former Pinnacle’s common stock was April 28, 2016. The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market for the periods indicated:
 
 
Price Range
 
 
High
 
Low
2017
 
 
 
 
Fourth Quarter
 
$
33.59

 
$
21.22

Third Quarter
 
$
21.46

 
$
18.30

Second Quarter
 
$
22.10

 
$
18.78

First Quarter
 
$
19.66

 
$
13.61

2016
 
 
 
 
Fourth Quarter
 
$
15.03

 
$
11.36

Third Quarter
 
$
12.71

 
$
10.41

Second Quarter (since April 29, 2016)
 
$
11.75

 
$
9.72

On February 23, 2018 , the last sale price of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market was $30.21.
Holders: As of February 23, 2018 , there were 1,686 stockholders of record of our common stock.
Dividends: We did not pay any cash dividends in 2017 . The Penn National Merger Agreement , the bond indenture governing our 5.625% Notes and our Senior Secured Credit Facilities limit the amount of dividends that we are permitted to pay.
Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities: During the year ended December 31, 2017 , we did not issue or sell any unregistered equity securities.


29

Table of Contents

Stock Performance Graph: The stock performance graph and related information presented below is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference into such a filing.
Set forth below is a graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return for Pinnacle’s common stock with the cumulative total returns for the NASDAQ Composite Index and the Dow Jones US Gambling Index. The total cumulative return calculations are for the period that commenced on April 29, 2016 and ended on December 31, 2017 , and include the reinvestment of dividends. The stock price performance shown in this graph is neither necessarily indicative of, nor intended to suggest, future stock price performance.
STOCKPERFORMANCEGRAPH2017A01.JPG
 
 
4/29/2016*
 
12/31/2016
 
12/31/2017
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.
 
$
100.00

 
$
131.34

 
$
296.47

NASDAQ Composite Index
 
$
100.00

 
$
112.82

 
$
145.87

Dow Jones US Gambling Index
 
$
100.00

 
$
122.01

 
$
170.99

*
Assumes $100 invested on April 29, 2016 in Pinnacle’s common stock, the NASDAQ Composite Index and the Dow Jones US Gambling Index. Total return assumes reinvestment of dividends.

30

Table of Contents

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities: The following table contains information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of Pinnacle or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a) (3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), of its common stock during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2017 .

Period
 
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased
 
Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) (1)
 
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
 
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that may be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2)
October 1 - October 31, 2017
 
23,236

 
$
21.63

 
23,236

 
$
7,577,726

November 1 - November 30, 2017
 

 
$

 

 
$
7,577,726

December 1 - December 31, 2017
 

 
$

 

 
$

Total
 
23,236

 
$
21.63

 
23,236

 
$


(1)
Average price paid per share for shares purchased as part of our share repurchase program (includes brokerage commissions).

(2)
In August 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $50.0 million of our common stock. In December 2017, the Company canceled the share repurchase program and at that time, we had repurchased 2.8 million shares of common stock for $42.4 million .


31

Table of Contents

Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
The following selected financial information for the years 2013 through 2017 was derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements . The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with “ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ,” the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes thereto.
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017 (a)
 
2016 (b)
 
2015 (c)
 
2014 (d)
 
2013 (e)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions, except per share data)
 
 
Results of Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
$
2,561.9

 
$
2,378.9

 
$
2,291.9

 
$
2,210.5

 
$
1,487.8

Operating income (loss)
$
428.6

 
$
(146.3
)
 
$
301.2

 
$
310.5

 
$
104.4

Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
61.7

 
$
(457.9
)
 
$
42.1

 
$
38.3

 
$
(133.4
)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
$

 
$
0.4

 
$
5.5

 
$
5.5

 
$
(122.5
)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
1.12

 
$
(7.80
)
 
$
0.71

 
$
0.64

 
$
(2.27
)
Diluted
$
1.02

 
$
(7.80
)
 
$
0.68

 
$
0.62

 
$
(2.27
)
Other Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital expenditures and land additions
$
78.9

 
$
97.9

 
$
84.0

 
$
230.8

 
$
292.6

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (f)
1.1x

 

 
1.2x

 
1.2x

 

Cash Flows Provided by (Used in):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating activities
$
285.8

 
$
255.7

 
$
408.2

 
$
328.5

 
$
161.1

Investing activities
$
(80.9
)
 
$
(195.1
)
 
$
(79.9
)
 
$
33.2

 
$
(1,842.7
)
Financing activities
$
(205.7
)
 
$
(39.6
)
 
$
(329.0
)
 
$
(395.6
)
 
$
1,778.5

Balance Sheet Data—December 31:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash, restricted cash and equivalents (g)
$
187.4

 
$
188.9

 
$
164.0

 
$
170.3

 
$
203.5

Total assets
$
3,950.2

 
$
4,077.1

 
$
4,530.9

 
$
4,802.5

 
$
5,121.7

Long-term debt less current portion
$
812.3

 
$
924.4

 
$
3,616.7

 
$
3,944.4

 
$
4,326.4

Long-term financing obligation less current portion
$
3,088.9

 
$
3,113.5

 
$

 
$

 
$

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
$
(321.0
)
 
$
(372.9
)
 
$
363.5

 
$
289.4

 
$
225.2

(a)
The results of operations for 2017 include the full year impact of the acquisition of the Meadows. In addition, our results of operations and financial position reflect the redemption of $193.2 million of aggregate principal amount of term loans, for a net reduction in total debt of $131.2 million under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities. In addition, our financial position reflects $49.8 million of principal payments made on the Master Lease financing obligation.
(b)
The results of operations and financial position for 2016 include the impact of the Spin-Off and Merger in April 2016; including the termination of Former Pinnacle ’s amended and restated credit agreement (“ Former Senior Secured Credit Facilities ”), early redemption of Former Pinnacle ’s senior notes and senior subordinated notes, entrance into our Senior Secured Credit Facilities and issuance of 5.625% Notes; entrance into the Master Lease, which resulted in the recognition of the financing obligation; and the acquisition of the Meadows in September 2016. In connection with these transactions, we incurred a $321.3 million impairment charge to goodwill, a $129.5 million impairment charge related to other intangible assets, a $5.2 million loss on early extinguishment of debt, $22.6 million of incremental share-based compensation expense attributable to the accelerated vesting of equity awards and $55.1 million in costs associated with the Spin-Off, Merger and the acquisition of the Meadows. Additionally, as a result of our 2016 annual assessment for impairment, we recognized impairments of goodwill and gaming licenses in the amounts of $1.2 million and $17.0 million, respectively.
(c)
The results of operations for 2015 include the impact of a $4.7 million impairment charge to goodwill, a $33.9 million impairment charge related to other intangible assets, a gain of $8.4 million related to the sale of approximately 40

32

Table of Contents

acres of land in Springfield, Massachusetts, and a gain of $4.8 million related to the sale of approximately 783 acres of excess land associated with our former Boomtown Reno operations. Our financial position reflects the redemption of $336.5 million of net aggregate principal amount of debt under the Former Senior Secured Credit Facilities during the year.
(d)
The results of operations for 2014 include the full year impact of the acquisition of Ameristar. In addition, the results of operations include Belterra Park, which opened on May 1, 2014. In addition, our results of operations and financial position reflect the redemption of $514.3 million of aggregate principal amount of term loans, for a net reduction in total debt of $401.3 million under the Former Senior Secured Credit Facilities, a portion of which resulted in an $8.2 million loss on early extinguishment of debt.
(e)
The results of operations for 2013 include the impact of the acquisition of Ameristar in August 2013. In addition, we incurred $85.3 million in costs associated with the acquisition of Ameristar, a $30.8 million loss on early extinguishment of debt, a $144.6 million charge to discontinued operations for the impairment of Lumiére Place Casino and Hotels classified as held for sale in 2013, a $10.0 million charge related to the impairment of our Boomtown Bossier City gaming license, a tax benefit from the release of $58.4 million of our valuation allowance as a result of the consolidation of our deferred tax assets with Ameristar’s deferred tax liabilities, and a $92.2 million impairment of our investment in ACDL.
(f)
In computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges: (x) earnings were pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations before losses from equity method investments and fixed charges, excluding capitalized interest; and (y) fixed charges were the sum of interest expense, amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount/premium, capitalized interest and the estimated interest component included in rental expense. Due principally to large non-cash charges deducted to compute such earnings, earnings were less than fixed charges by $99.5 million and $485.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
(g)
The amount for 2013 excludes cash and cash equivalents associated with Lumiére Place Casino and Hotels, which was classified as held for sale.

33

Table of Contents

Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. owns and operates 16 gaming, hospitality and entertainment businesses, of which 15 operate in leased facilities. Our owned facility is located in Ohio and our leased facilities are located in Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada and Pennsylvania. The leased facilities located outside of Pennsylvania are subject to the Master Lease (as defined below) and our leased facility located in Pennsylvania is subject to the Meadows Lease (as defined below). References herein to “Pinnacle,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” refer to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and its subsidiaries, except where stated or the context otherwise indicates. References to “Former Pinnacle” refer to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. prior to the Spin-Off and Merger (as such terms are defined below).

We view each of our operating businesses as an operating segment with the exception of our two businesses in Jackpot, Nevada, which we view as one operating segment. For financial reporting purposes, we aggregate our operating segments into the following reportable segments:
Midwest segment, which includes:
Location
Ameristar Council Bluffs
Council Bluffs, Iowa
Ameristar East Chicago
East Chicago, Indiana
Ameristar Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri
Ameristar St. Charles
St. Charles, Missouri
Belterra Resort
Florence, Indiana
Belterra Park
Cincinnati, Ohio
Meadows
Washington, Pennsylvania
River City
St. Louis, Missouri
 
 
South segment, which includes:
Location
Ameristar Vicksburg
Vicksburg, Mississippi
Boomtown Bossier City
Bossier City, Louisiana
Boomtown New Orleans
New Orleans, Louisiana
L’Auberge Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
L’Auberge Lake Charles
Lake Charles, Louisiana
 
 
West segment, which includes:
Location
Ameristar Black Hawk
Black Hawk, Colorado
Cactus Petes and Horseshu
Jackpot, Nevada

All of our gaming, hospitality and entertainment businesses include gaming, food and beverage, and retail facilities, and most include hotel and resort amenities. Our operating results are highly dependent on the volume of customers at our businesses, which, in turn, affects the price we can charge for hotel rooms and other amenities. While we do provide casino credit in several gaming jurisdictions, most of our revenue is cash-based, with customers wagering with cash or paying for hospitality or entertainment services with cash or credit cards. Our businesses generate significant operating cash flow. Our industry is capital-intensive, and we rely on the ability of our businesses to generate operating cash flow to satisfy our obligations under the Master Lease and the Meadows Lease, pay interest, repay debt, and fund maintenance capital expenditures.

Our mission is to increase stockholder value. We seek to increase revenues through enhancing the guest experience by providing them with their favorite games, restaurants, hotel accommodations, entertainment and other amenities in attractive surroundings with high-quality guest service and our my choice guest loyalty program (“my choice program”). We seek to improve cash flows by focusing on operational excellence and efficiency while trying to exceed our guests’ expectations of

34

Table of Contents

value. In making decisions, we consider our stockholders, guests, team members and other constituents in the communities in which we operate.

Proposed Company Sale

On December 17, 2017, Pinnacle entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “ Penn National Merger Agreement ”) with Penn National Gaming, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (“ Penn National ”), and Franchise Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Penn National (“ Franchise Merger Sub ”), providing for the merger of Franchise Merger Sub with and into Pinnacle (the “ Proposed Company Sale ”), with Pinnacle surviving the Proposed Company Sale as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Penn National .

At the effective time of the Proposed Company Sale , each share of Pinnacle common stock, par value $0.01 per share, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than shares held by Penn National and other than dissenting shares) will be canceled and converted automatically into the right to receive (i) $20.00 in cash (plus, if the Proposed Company Sale is not consummated on or prior to October 31, 2018, $0.01 for each day during the period commencing on November 1, 2018 through the effective time of the Proposed Company Sale ) (the “Cash Consideration”) and (ii) 0.42 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Penn National (the “Penn National Common Stock”) (together with the Cash Consideration and cash required to be paid in lieu of fractional shares of Penn National Common Stock, the “ Proposed Company Sale Consideration ”).

In connection with the Proposed Company Sale , Penn National entered into (i) a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Membership Interest Purchase Agreement”) with Boyd Gaming Corporation (“ Boyd ”), to which Pinnacle will become a party immediately prior to the Proposed Company Sale , pursuant to which a subsidiary of Boyd will acquire the gaming and related operations of Ameristar St. Charles, Ameristar Kansas City, Belterra Resort and Belterra Park, in connection with the Proposed Company Sale ; and (ii) definitive agreements with a subsidiary of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (“GLPI”), a Pennsylvania corporation and real estate investment trust, to which Pinnacle will become a party immediately prior to the Proposed Company Sale , pursuant to which GLPI’s subsidiary will acquire the real estate associated with Belterra Park, from Pinnacle, and Plainridge Park Casino in Plainville, Massachusetts, from Penn National . At the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, GLPI and Boyd will enter into a master lease agreement for the gaming operations acquired by Boyd and Penn National will assume Pinnacle’s existing Master Lease and Meadows Lease and enter into certain amendments thereto.

Completion of the Proposed Company Sale is subject to certain conditions, many of which are beyond our control, including, among others: (1) receipt of the approval of stockholders of both Penn National and Pinnacle as required for the transaction, including the approval of the issuance of Penn National ’s common stock in connection with the Proposed Company Sale Consideration ; (2) the absence of any injunction, restraining order or other orders or laws prohibiting the consummation of the Proposed Company Sale ; (3) the expiration or termination of any waiting period applicable to the Proposed Company Sale under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Acts of 1976, as amended; (4) the receipt of all required regulatory approvals in a timely manner (including receipt of necessary approvals from gaming regulatory authorities); (5) the registration of the shares of Penn National to be issued to stockholders of Pinnacle; and (6) the listing of the shares of Penn National on The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC. The obligation of each party to consummate the Proposed Company Sale is also conditioned upon the accuracy of the other party’s representations and warranties, the absence of a material adverse effect involving the other party, and the other party having performed in all material respects its obligations under the Penn National Merger Agreement . Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the closing conditions, the Proposed Company Sale is expected to close in the second half of 2018. If the Proposed Company Sale is completed, Pinnacle stockholders will hold approximately 22% of the combined company’s outstanding shares.

If the Proposed Company Sale is not consummated on or before October 31, 2018, subject to certain limited extensions (including pursuant to Penn National’s election to extend under certain circumstances) provided in the Penn National Merger Agreement , either party may terminate the Penn National Merger Agreement . Consummation of the Proposed Company Sale is not subject to a financing condition.

There can be no assurance that the Proposed Company Sale will be completed as contemplated. Furthermore, there are a number of risks and uncertainties to our business related to the Proposed Company Sale . For additional information, please see Item 1A. “Risk Factors, Risks Relating to the Proposed Company Sale to Penn National.”


35

Table of Contents

Spin-Off and Merger

On April 28, 2016, Former Pinnacle completed the transactions under the terms of a definitive agreement with GLPI (the “GLPI Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the GLPI Merger Agreement, Former Pinnacle separated its operating assets and liabilities (and its Belterra Park property and excess land at certain locations) into the Company, a newly formed subsidiary initially named PNK Entertainment, Inc., and distributed to its stockholders, on a pro rata basis, all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company (such distribution referred to as the “Spin-Off”). As a result, Former Pinnacle stockholders received one share of the Company’s common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share, for each share of Former Pinnacle common stock that they owned. Gold Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of GLPI (“Merger Sub”), then merged with and into Former Pinnacle (the “Merger”), with Merger Sub surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of GLPI. Immediately following the Merger, the Company was renamed Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., and operates its businesses under a triple-net master lease agreement for the facilities acquired by GLPI (the “Master Lease”). See “ Liquidity and Capital Resources ” for further discussion of the Master Lease.

In completing the Merger, each share of common stock, par value $0.10 per share, of Former Pinnacle (the “Former Pinnacle Common Stock”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than shares of Former Pinnacle Common Stock (i) owned or held in treasury by Former Pinnacle or (ii) owned by GLPI, its subsidiaries or Merger Sub) was canceled and converted into the right to receive 0.85 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of GLPI.

We concluded that the spin-off of the Company should be accounted for as the reverse of its legal form under the requirements of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 505-60, Spinoff and Reverse Spinoffs , which resulted in the Company being considered the accounting spinnor. The facilities acquired by GLPI, which are leased back by the Company under the Master Lease, did not qualify for sale-leaseback accounting. Therefore, the Master Lease is accounted for as a financing obligation and the facilities remain on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Acquisition of the Meadows Business and Meadows Lease

On September 9, 2016, we closed on a purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with GLP Capital, L.P. (“GLPC”), a subsidiary of GLPI, pursuant to which we acquired all of the equity interests of The Meadows Racetrack and Casino (“Meadows”) located in Washington, Pennsylvania for base consideration of $138.0 million , subject to certain adjustments. The purchase price, after giving effect to such adjustments, was $134.0 million . As a result of the transaction, we own and operate the Meadows’ gaming, entertainment and harness racing business subject to a triple-net lease of its underlying real estate with GLPI (the “Meadows Lease”).

The Meadows Lease provides for a 10 -year initial term, including renewal terms at our option, up to a total of 29 years . As of December 31, 2017, annual rent under the Meadows Lease was $25.8 million , payable in monthly installments, and comprised of a base rent of $14.4 million , which is subject to certain adjustments, and an initial percentage rent of $11.4 million . The base rent is subject to an annual escalation of up to 5% for the initial term or until the lease year in which base rent plus percentage rent is a total of $31.0 million , subject to certain adjustments, and up to 2% thereafter, subject to an Adjusted Revenue to Rent Ratio (as defined in the Meadows Lease) of 1.8 :1 during the second year of the lease, 1.9 :1 during the third year of the lease and 2.0 :1 during the fourth year of the lease and thereafter. The percentage rent is fixed for the first two years and will be adjusted every two years to establish a new fixed amount for the next two -year period equal to 4% of the average annual net revenues during the trailing two -year period.

36

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table highlights our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . As discussed in Note 13, “Segment Information,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements , we report segment operating results based on revenues and Adjusted EBITDAR. Such segment reporting is on a basis consistent with how we measure our business and allocate resources internally.
The following table highlights our revenues and Adjusted EBITDAR (defined below) for each segment. In addition, the following table includes a reconciliation of Income (loss) from continuing operations, which is determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”), to Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR (defined below) and to Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR, net of Lease Payments (defined below), which are non-GAAP financial measures.
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions, except margin)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
Midwest segment (a)
$
1,547.0

 
$
1,359.9

 
$
1,265.6

South segment (a)
767.1

 
777.1

 
793.3

West segment (a)
242.2

 
236.0

 
226.6

 
2,556.3

 
2,373.0

 
2,285.5

Corporate and other (b)
5.6

 
5.9

 
6.4

      Total revenues
$
2,561.9

 
$
2,378.9

 
$
2,291.9

Adjusted EBITDAR (c):
 
 
 
 
 
Midwest segment (a)
$
439.8

 
$
402.4

 
$
379.3

South segment (a)
250.3

 
246.1

 
239.0

West segment (a)
93.1

 
88.4

 
81.7

 
783.2

 
736.9

 
700.0

Corporate expenses and other (b)
(81.3
)
 
(82.4
)
 
(83.0
)
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR (c)
701.9

 
654.5

 
617.0

Lease Payments (d)
(406.3
)
 
(264.0
)
 

Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, net of Lease Payments (d)
$
295.6

 
$
390.5

 
$
617.0

 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
61.7

 
$
(457.9
)
 
$
42.1

Rent expense under the Meadows Lease
16.3

 
5.1

 

Depreciation and amortization
217.0

 
218.3

 
242.5

Pre-opening, development and other costs
9.5

 
56.0

 
14.2

Non-cash share-based compensation
14.7

 
35.5

 
17.8

Impairment of goodwill

 
322.5

 
4.7

Impairment of other intangible assets

 
146.5

 
33.9

Write-downs, reserves and recoveries, net
15.8

 
16.9

 
2.7

Interest expense, net
380.9

 
334.3

 
244.4

Loss on early extinguishment of debt
0.5

 
5.2

 

Loss from equity method investment
0.1

 
0.1

 
0.1

Income tax expense (benefit)
(14.6
)
 
(28.0
)
 
14.6

Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR (c)
701.9

 
654.5

 
617.0

Lease Payments (d)
(406.3
)
 
(264.0
)
 

Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, net of Lease Payments (d)
$
295.6

 
$
390.5

 
$
617.0

 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations margin
2.4
%
 
(19.2
)%
 
1.8
%
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR margin (c)
27.4
%
 
27.5
 %
 
26.9
%

(a)
See “ Executive Overview ” section for listing of properties included in each reportable segment.


37


(b)
Corporate and other includes revenues from a live and televised poker tournament series that operates under the trade name, Heartland Poker Tour (“HPT”), and management fees associated with Retama Park Racetrack, which is located outside of San Antonio, Texas. Corporate expenses represent payroll, professional fees, travel expenses and other general and administrative expenses not directly related to our casino and hotel operations. Corporate expenses that are directly attributable to a property are allocated to each applicable property. Other includes expenses relating to the operation of HPT and management of Retama Park Racetrack.

(c)
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR and Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR margin are non-GAAP financial measures. We define Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR as earnings before interest income and expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent expense associated with the Meadows Lease, pre-opening, development and other costs, non-cash share-based compensation, asset impairment costs, write-downs, reserves, recoveries, gain (loss) on sale of certain assets, loss on early extinguishment of debt, gain (loss) on sale of equity security investments, income (loss) from equity method investments, non-controlling interest and discontinued operations. We define Adjusted EBITDAR for each reportable segment as earnings before interest income and expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent expense associated with the Meadows Lease, pre-opening, development and other costs, non-cash share-based compensation, asset impairment costs, write-downs, reserves, recoveries, inter-company management fees, gain (loss) on sale of certain assets, gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt, gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations and discontinued operations. We define Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR margin as Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR divided by revenues on a consolidated basis. We define Adjusted EBITDAR margin as Adjusted EBITDAR for the segment divided by segment revenues. We use Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR for each segment to compare operating results among our businesses and between accounting periods. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR have economic substance because they are used by management as measures to analyze the performance of our business and are especially relevant in evaluating large, long-lived casino-hotel projects because they provide a perspective on the current effects of operating decisions separated from the substantial non-operational depreciation charges and financing costs of such projects. We eliminate the results from discontinued operations at the time they are deemed discontinued. We also review pre-opening, development and other costs separately, as such expenses are also included in total project costs when assessing budgets and project returns, and because such costs relate to anticipated future revenues and income. We believe that Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR, Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR margin and Adjusted EBITDAR are useful measures for investors because they are indicators of the performance of ongoing business operations. These calculations are commonly used as a basis for investors, analysts and credit rating agencies to evaluate and compare operating performance and value of companies within our industry. In addition, Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR approximates the measures used in the debt covenants within the Company’s debt agreements. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR do not include depreciation or interest expense and, therefore, do not reflect current or future capital expenditures or the cost of capital. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR should not be considered as an alternative to operating income (loss) as an indicator of performance, or as an alternative to any other measure provided in accordance with GAAP. Our calculations of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR may be different from the calculation methods used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited.

(d)
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, net of Lease Payments is a non-GAAP financial measure. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, net of Lease Payments is defined as Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR (as defined above), less Lease Payments. The Company defines Lease Payments as lease payments made to GLPI for the Master Lease and the Meadows Lease. We believe that Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, net of Lease Payments is a useful measure to compare operating results between accounting periods. In addition, Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, net of Lease Payments is a useful measure for investors because it is an indicator of the performance of ongoing business operations after incorporating the cash flow obligations associated with the Master Lease and the Meadows Lease. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, net of Lease Payments should not be considered as an alternative to operating income (loss) as an indicator of performance, or as an alternative to any other measure provided in accordance with GAAP. Our calculations of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, net of Lease Payments may be different from the calculation methods used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited.

Consolidated Overview

For the year ended December 31, 2017 , total revenues increased by $183.0 million , or 7.7% , year over year to $2.6 billion and income from continuing operations was $61.7 million . Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR was $701.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , an increase of $47.4 million , or 7.2% , year over year and Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, net of Lease Payments was $295.6 million . Income from continuing operations margin was 2.4% for the year ended December 31, 2017 . Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR margin for the year ended December 31, 2017 , was 27.4% , representing a year over year decrease of 10 bps , which was driven by the acquisition of the Meadows.

For the year ended December 31, 2016 , total revenues increased by $87.0 million , or 3.8% , year over year to $2.4 billion , loss from continuing operations was $457.9 million and Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR was $654.5 million , an increase of $37.5 million , or 6.1% , year over year. Loss from continuing operations margin was 19.2% for the year ended December 31, 2016 . Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR margin for the year ended December 31, 2016 , was 27.5% , representing a year over year increase of 60 bps .

The 2017 consolidated operating results benefited from the full year of operations at Meadows, which was acquired on September 9, 2016, and improved operating performances at L’Auberge Baton Rouge, Belterra Park, Belterra Resort, River City and Ameristar Black Hawk. The consolidated operating results were negatively impacted by lost business volume at

38


L’Auberge Lake Charles, due principally to Hurricane Harvey, and at Ameristar Kansas City due to road construction surrounding the facility, and by lower gaming and hospitality volume at Ameristar Vicksburg.

The 2016 consolidated operating results were driven by the acquisition of the Meadows and improved operating performances at Belterra Park, L’Auberge Lake Charles, L’Auberge Baton Rouge, Ameristar Black Hawk and Ameristar East Chicago. A focus on growing certain revenue streams and continued focus on operational efficiencies throughout our portfolio of businesses resulted in Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR margin improvement year over year on top of a year over year improvement achieved in the prior year. The improved operating performance, in part, due to marketing reinvestment efficiencies and other operating efficiencies, offset softness in revenue trends at certain of our businesses, particularly in the South segment. The 2016 consolidated operating results benefited from lower expense accruals from compensation program changes of $4.6 million. Non-cash impairment charges to goodwill and other intangible assets, primarily as a result of the Spin-Off and Merger, in the amounts of $322.5 million and $146.5 million, respectively, resulted in a loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 .

We offer incentives to our guests through our my choice program. Under the my choice program, guests earn points based on their level of play that may be redeemed for various benefits, such as cash back, dining, or hotel stays, among others. The reward credit balance under the program will be forfeited if the guest does not earn any reward credits over the prior six-month period. In addition, based on their level of play, guests can earn additional benefits without redeeming points, such as a car lease, among other items. In January 2018, the Company implemented the my choice program at Meadows, which previously operated its own guest loyalty program.

We accrue a liability for the estimated cost of providing these benefits as the benefits are earned. Estimates and assumptions are made regarding cost of providing the benefits, breakage rates, and the mixture of goods and services guests will choose. We use historical data to assist in the determination of estimated accruals. Changes in estimates or guest redemption habits could produce different results. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , we had accrued $21.0 million and $25.1 million , respectively, for the estimated cost of providing these benefits. As described below in “ Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements ,” the accounting related to our guest loyalty programs was impacted by the adoption of ASC 606 (as defined below) during the first quarter 2018.
 
The Company’s revenue consists mostly of gaming revenue, which is primarily from slot machines and to a lesser extent, table games. The slot revenue represented approximately 83%, 82% and 82% of gaming revenue in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. In analyzing the performance of our businesses, the key indicators related to gaming revenue are slot handle and table games drop (which are volume indicators) and win or hold percentage.

Slot handle or video lottery terminal (“VLT”) handle represents the total amount wagered in a slot machine or VLT, and table games drop represents the total amount of cash and net markers issued that are deposited in gaming table drop boxes. Win represents the amount of wagers retained by us and recorded as gaming revenue, and hold represents win as a percentage of slot handle, VLT handle or table games drop. Given the stability in our slot and VLT hold percentages, we have not experienced any significant impact on our results of operations due to changes in hold percentages.

For table games, guests usually purchase cash chips at the gaming tables. The cash and markers (extensions of credit granted to certain credit-worthy guests) are deposited in the drop box of each gaming table. Table game win is the amount of drop that is retained and recorded as gaming revenue, with liabilities recognized for funds deposited by guests.


39


Segment comparison of years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015

Midwest Segment 
 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
Change
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2017 vs. 2016
 
2016 vs. 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions, except margin)
 
 
 
 
Gaming revenues
 
$
1,393.4

 
$
1,230.1

 
$
1,146.9

 
13.3
%
 
7.3
 %
Total revenues
 
$
1,547.0

 
$
1,359.9

 
$
1,265.6

 
13.8
%
 
7.5
 %
Operating income
 
$
290.6

 
$
25.5

 
$
218.9

 
NM

 
(88.4
)%
Adjusted EBITDAR
 
$
439.8

 
$
402.4

 
$
379.3

 
9.3
%
 
6.1
 %
Adjusted EBITDAR margin
 
28.4
%
 
29.6
%
 
30.0
%
 
(120) bps
 
(40) bps
NM — Not Meaningful

In the Midwest segment, total revenues increased by $187.1 million , or 13.8% , year over year to $1.5 billion and Adjusted EBITDAR increased by $37.4 million , or 9.3% , year over year to $439.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 . For the year ended December 31, 2016 , total revenues increased by $94.3 million , or 7.5% , year over year to $1.4 billion and Adjusted EBITDAR increased by $23.1 million , or 6.1% , year over year to $402.4 million . The acquisition of the Meadows on September 9, 2016 contributed $281.9 million of total revenues and $51.2 million of Adjusted EBITDAR for the year ended December 31, 2017 and $83.9 million of total revenues and $12.9 million of Adjusted EBITDAR for the year ended December 31, 2016 .

As compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 , the Midwest segment’s total revenues and Adjusted EBITDAR for the year ended December 31, 2017 benefited from the timing of the acquisition of the Meadows and improved operating performances at Belterra Park, where gaming and hospitality volumes have continued to ramp up and marketing efficiencies continued; Belterra Resort, where an emphasis on cash hospitality revenue streams continued; and River City, where gaming volume continued to increase and hospitality revenues increased, in part, from the ramp up of new food and beverage outlets. The Midwest segment operating results were negatively impacted by lost business volume at Ameristar Kansas City due to road construction surrounding the facility.

As compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, the Midwest segment’s total revenues and Adjusted EBITDAR for the year ended December 31, 2016 benefited from the acquisition of the Meadows and improved operating performance at Belterra Resort, Belterra Park, River City and Ameristar East Chicago, but were negatively impacted by lost business volume at Ameristar St. Charles due, in part, to highway interchange construction on Interstate 70 through its completion in November 2016. Modest growth in gaming revenues, an emphasis on cash hospitality revenue streams, and operational efficiencies resulted in improved operating performance at Belterra Resort. At Belterra Park, gaming volumes continued to ramp up and additional cost efficiencies were realized. River City experienced growth in hospitality revenue, in part, from the ramp up of new food and beverage outlets, Asian Noodle and Cibare Italian Kitchen, which opened in September 2016 and November 2016, respectively. Ameristar East Chicago benefited from cost efficiencies, particularly in hospitality.

In addition, the Midwest segment’s operating income and Adjusted EBITDAR for the year ended December 31, 2016 benefited from lower expense accruals from compensation program changes of $2.5 million. Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2016 was negatively impacted by $245.3 million in non-cash impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets as a result of an interim assessment for impairment caused by the Spin-Off and Merger and our 2016 annual assessment for impairment.


40


South Segment
 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
Change
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2017 vs. 2016
 
2016 vs. 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions, except margin)
 
 
 
 
Gaming revenues
 
$
691.1

 
$
701.0

 
$
712.4

 
(1.4
)%
 
(1.6
)%
Total revenues
 
$
767.1

 
$
777.1

 
$
793.3

 
(1.3
)%
 
(2.0
)%
Operating income (loss)
 
$
180.0

 
$
(16.7
)
 
$
150.2

 
NM

 
NM

Adjusted EBITDAR
 
$
250.3

 
$
246.1

 
$
239.0

 
1.7
 %
 
3.0
 %
Adjusted EBITDAR margin
 
32.6
%
 
31.7
%
 
30.1
%
 
90 bps
 
160 bps
NM — Not Meaningful

In the South segment, total revenues decreased by $10.0 million , or 1.3% , year over year to $767.1 million and Adjusted EBITDAR increased by $4.2 million , or 1.7% , year over year to $250.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 . For the year ended December 31, 2016 , total revenues decreased by $16.2 million , or 2.0% , year over year to $777.1 million and Adjusted EBITDAR increased by $7.1 million , or 3.0% , year over year to $246.1 million .

As compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 , the South segment’s total revenues and Adjusted EBITDAR for the year ended December 31, 2017 benefited from improved operating performance at L’Auberge Baton Rouge, which continued to experience gaming revenue growth as well as achieved operational efficiencies principally relating to marketing efforts. A focus on improving operational efficiencies at L’Auberge Lake Charles largely offset lost business volume at this business principally caused by Hurricane Harvey. Ameristar Vicksburg experienced lower gaming and hospitality volume during the year ended December 31, 2017 .

As compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, the South segment’s total revenues and Adjusted EBITDAR for the year ended December 31, 2016 were driven by improved operating performances at L’Auberge Baton Rouge and L’Auberge Lake Charles. The operating results at L’Auberge Lake Charles stabilized and begun to recover since the opening of a new competitor in December 2014, which added gaming and hotel capacity to the Lake Charles market. Ameristar Vicksburg, Boomtown Bossier City and Boomtown New Orleans experienced softness in revenue trends, which partially offset the improved operating performances at L’Auberge Baton Rouge and L’Auberge Lake Charles. In addition to increased operational efficiencies, particularly at L’Auberge Baton Rouge and L’Auberge Lake Charles, Adjusted EBITDAR for the year ended December 31, 2016 benefited from lower expense accruals from compensation program changes of $1.1 million. Non-cash impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets in the amount of $179.9 million, which was the result of an interim assessment for impairment caused by the Spin-Off and Merger, resulted in an operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 .

West Segment
 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
Change
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2017 vs. 2016
 
2016 vs. 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions, except margin)
 
 
 
 
Gaming revenues
 
$
202.4

 
$
196.9

 
$
189.0

 
2.8
%
 
4.2
 %
Total revenues
 
$
242.2

 
$
236.0

 
$
226.6

 
2.6
%
 
4.1
 %
Operating income
 
$
72.0

 
$
25.2

 
$
56.0

 
NM

 
(55.0
)%
Adjusted EBITDAR
 
$
93.1

 
$
88.4

 
$
81.7

 
5.3
%
 
8.2
 %
Adjusted EBITDAR margin
 
38.4
%
 
37.5
%
 
36.1
%
 
90 bps
 
140 bps
NM — Not Meaningful

41



In the West segment, total revenues increased by $6.2 million , or 2.6% , year over year to $242.2 million and Adjusted EBITDAR increased by $4.7 million , or 5.3% , year over year to $93.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 . For the year ended December 31, 2016, total revenues increased by $9.4 million , or 4.1% , year over year to $236.0 million and Adjusted EBITDAR increased by $6.7 million , or 8.2% , year over year to $88.4 million .

As compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, the West segment’s total revenues and Adjusted EBITDAR for the year ended December 31, 2017 were positively impacted by the operating performance at Ameristar Black Hawk, which continued to experience visitation and volume growth.

As compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, the West segment’s total revenues and Adjusted EBITDAR for the year ended December 31, 2016 were driven by improved visitation and volume at Ameristar Black Hawk and the Jackpot Properties as well as continued operational efficiencies. In addition, the West segment’s operating results benefited from the opening of the newly renovated buffet at Cactus Petes in April 2016 and lower expense accruals from compensation program changes of $0.4 million. Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2016 was negatively impacted by a $42.6 million non-cash impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets as a result of an interim assessment for impairment caused by the Spin-Off and Merger.

Other factors affecting income (loss) from continuing operations
 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
Change
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2017 vs. 2016
 
2016 vs. 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
Other benefits (costs):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate expenses and other
 
$
(81.3
)
 
$
(82.4
)
 
$
(83.0
)
 
(1.3
)%
 
(0.7
)%
Rent expense under the Meadows Lease
 
$
(16.3
)
 
$
(5.1
)
 
$

 
NM

 
NM

Depreciation and amortization expense
 
$
(217.0
)
 
$
(218.3
)
 
$
(242.5
)
 
(0.6
)%
 
(10.0
)%
Pre-opening, development and other costs
 
$
(9.5
)
 
$
(56.0
)
 
$
(14.2
)
 
(83.0
)%
 
NM

Share-based compensation expense
 
$
(14.7
)
 
$
(35.5
)
 
$
(17.8
)
 
(58.6
)%
 
99.4
 %
Impairment of goodwill
 
$

 
$
(322.5
)
 
$
(4.7
)
 
NM

 
NM

Impairment of other intangible assets
 
$

 
$
(146.5
)
 
$
(33.9
)
 
NM

 
NM

Write-downs, reserves and recoveries, net
 
$
(15.8
)
 
$
(16.9
)
 
$
(2.7
)
 
(6.5
)%
 
NM

Interest expense, net
 
$
(380.9
)
 
$
(334.3
)
 
$
(244.4
)
 
13.9
 %
 
36.8
 %
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
 
$
(0.5
)
 
$
(5.2
)
 
$

 
(90.4
)%
 
NM

Loss from equity method investment
 
$
(0.1
)
 
$
(0.1
)
 
$
(0.1
)
 
 %
 
 %
Income tax benefit (expense)
 
$
14.6

 
$
28.0

 
$
(14.6
)
 
(47.9
)%
 
NM

NM — Not Meaningful

Corporate expenses and other is principally comprised of corporate overhead expense, HPT and the management of Retama Park Racetrack. Corporate overhead expense decreased by $1.1 million year over year to $81.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily attributable to lower legal settlement accruals. The decrease in corporate overhead expense of $0.6 million year over year to $82.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily driven by lower professional services and by a decrease in expense accruals from compensation program changes of $0.6 million.

Rent expense under the Meadows Lease for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, increased as compared to the respective prior years as a result of the timing of the acquisition of Meadows and the commencement of the Meadows Lease, which occurred on September 9, 2016.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, as compared to the respective prior years primarily as a result of decreases caused by the timing of furniture, fixtures and equipment becoming fully depreciated and the accelerated method of amortization on our player relationships, partially offset by the increases attributable to the timing of the acquisition of Meadows, which occurred on September 9, 2016.

42



As a result of the Spin-Off and Merger, substantially all of the land, buildings, vessels and associated improvements used in the Company’s operations and included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets are subject to the Master Lease and owned by GLPI. Furthermore, these assets continue to be depreciated consistent with treatment prior to the Spin-Off and Merger.
Pre-opening, development and other costs consisted of the following:
 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Proposed Company Sale costs (1)
 
$
6.9

 
$

 
$

Spin-Off and Merger costs (1)
 
0.9

 
48.7

 
12.2

Meadows acquisition costs (1)
 
0.2

 
6.4

 

Other
 
1.5

 
0.9

 
2.0

Total pre-opening, development and other costs
 
$
9.5

 
$
56.0

 
$
14.2

(1)
Amounts comprised principally of legal, advisory and other costs associated with each of these transactions.

Share-based compensation expense decreased as compared to the prior year for the year ended December 31, 2017 , and increased as compared to the prior year for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to the $22.6 million of incremental expense attributable to the accelerated vesting of share-based payment awards as a result of the Spin-Off and Merger, which was included in the year ended December 31, 2016.

Impairment of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2016 included a non-cash impairment charge of $321.3 million as a result of an interim assessment for impairment. Given that the Spin-Off and Merger transactions represented a significant financial restructuring event that increased our cash flow obligations in connection with the Master Lease, we concluded that an indicator of impairment existed as of April 28, 2016, the closing date of the transactions. Additionally, the year ended December 31, 2016 included a $1.2 million non-cash impairment charge at HPT as a result of our 2016 annual assessment for impairment.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, as a result of separate interim assessments for impairment, we recognized non-cash impairments of the goodwill of Pinnacle Retama Partners, LLC (“PRP”) and HPT in the amounts of $3.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively. For PRP, we determined that there was an indicator that impairment may exist on its goodwill and other intangible assets as a result of the lack of legislative progress and on-going negative operating results at Retama Park Racetrack. For HPT, we determined that there was an indicator that impairment may exist on its goodwill and other intangible assets due to its operating performance.
Impairment of other intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2016 consisted of non-cash impairment charges to gaming licenses and trade names, in the amounts of $85.5 million and $61.0 million , respectively. Of the $85.5 million , $68.5 million was the result of an interim assessment for impairment performed as of April 28, 2016 due to the Spin-Off and Merger and $17.0 million was the result of our 2016 annual assessment for impairment. The gaming license impairments pertained to our Midwest segment and the trade name impairments related to our Midwest, South and West segments, in the amounts of $35.3 million , $22.2 million and $3.5 million , respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, as a result of our 2015 annual assessment for impairment, we recognized non-cash impairments of a gaming license and a trade name in the amounts of $27.5 million and $0.5 million , respectively. The gaming license impairment, which pertained to our Midwest segment, was primarily driven by the operating results of one of our businesses being below expectations, which resulted in revisions to our long-term operating projections for this business. The trade name impairment, which pertained to our West segment, was primarily the result of updated assumptions used in the analysis, such as the discount rate.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, as a result of separate interim assessments for impairment, we recognized non-cash impairments of the racing license of Retama Park Racetrack, the HPT trade name and the HPT player relationship, in the amounts of $5.0 million , $0.2 million and $0.7 million , respectively.

43


Write-downs, reserves and recoveries, net, consisted of the following:
 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Loss on disposals of long-lived assets, net
 
$
10.2

 
$
16.2

 
$
0.3

Impairment of held-to-maturity securities
 
3.8

 

 

Impairment of long-lived assets
 
0.1

 
0.2

 
3.2

Other
 
1.7

 
0.5

 
(0.8
)
Write-downs, reserves and recoveries, net
 
$
15.8

 
$
16.9

 
$
2.7


Loss on disposals of long-lived assets, net: During the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , we recorded net losses of $10.2 million , $16.2 million and $8.7 million , respectively, related primarily to disposals of furniture, fixtures and equipment at the properties in the normal course of business. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded a gain on the sale of land in Springfield, Massachusetts, originally purchased by Ameristar Casinos, Inc., for a possible future casino resort of $8.4 million .

Impairment of held-to-maturity securities: During the year ended December 31, 2017 , as a result of the lack of legislative progress and on-going negative operating results at Retama Park Racetrack, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment on our local government corporation bonds issued by Retama Development Corporation, a local government corporation of the City of Selma, Texas.

Impairment of long-lived assets: During the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015, we recorded non-cash impairments of furniture, fixtures and equipment at the properties in the normal course of business. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded a total of $3.0 million in non-cash impairment charges on land in Central City, Colorado.
Interest expense, net, was as follows:
 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Interest expense from financing obligation (1)
 
$
331.1

 
$
225.1

 
$

Interest expense from debt (2)
 
50.3

 
108.0

 
244.7

Interest income
 
(0.4
)
 
(0.4
)
 
(0.3
)
Capitalized interest
 
(0.1
)
 
(0.1
)
 

Other (3)
 

 
1.7

 

Interest expense, net
 
$
380.9

 
$
334.3

 
$
244.4

(1)
Total payments under the Master Lease, which commenced on April 28, 2016, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, were $380.9 million and $256.1 million , respectively.
(2)
Interest expense associated with the Former Senior Secured Credit Facilities, the 6.375% Notes, the 7.50% Notes, the 7.75% Notes, and the 8.75% Notes (as such terms are defined in the “ Liquidity and Capital Resources ” section below), which were no longer obligations of the Company as of April 28, 2016, included in the year ended December 31, 2016 was $76.5 million .
(3)
Represents a nonrecurring expense associated with the Spin-Off and Merger.

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, interest expense, net, increased as compared to the respective prior years due principally to the increases in interest expense associated with the Master Lease financing obligation, which offset the decreases in interest expense incurred related to our debt borrowings.
 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, related to the repayments, in full, of the Term Loan B Facility (as defined in the “ Liquidity and Capital Resources ” section below) and the Former Senior Secured Credit Facilities, respectively. The losses included the write-off of previously unamortized debt issuance costs and original issuance discount.

Loss on equity method investment represents losses recognized for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , for our allocable share of an investment in a land re-vitalization project in downtown St. Louis.

44



Income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $14.6 million , as compared to income tax benefit of $28.0 million and income tax expense of $14.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, and 2015, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , the effective tax rates were (31.0)% , 5.8% and 25.7% , respectively. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), which was enacted on December 22, 2017, significantly revised U.S. corporate income tax law by, among other things, reducing the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% and granting indefinite carry-forward of net operating losses generated on or after January 1, 2018. The Tax Act also imposed a new minimum tax on global intangible low-taxed income and implemented a modified territorial tax system that included a one-time transition tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries, neither of which significantly impacted the Company upon enactment.

Our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2017 was impacted by a one-time benefit from the Tax Act of $21.5 million , principally as a result of the revaluation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities and the change in net operating loss carry-forward rules. Our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2016 was impacted by the non-cash impairments of goodwill and other intangible assets, principally as a result of the Spin-Off and Merger. Our effective tax rate may differ from the expected federal statutory tax rate due to the effect of permanent items, the recording of valuation allowance releases, deferred tax expense on tax amortization of indefinite-lived intangible assets, state taxes and reserves for unrecognized tax benefits.

The Spin-Off described in the “ Executive Overview ” was a taxable transaction whereby a gain was recognized for tax purposes and the tax bases of the operating assets were stepped up to fair market value at the time of the transaction. Pursuant to ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes , the tax impact directly related to the transaction amongst stockholders was recorded to equity, consistent with the overall accounting treatment of the transaction. All changes in tax bases of assets and liabilities caused by the transactions were recorded to additional paid-in capital. Furthermore, as previously noted, the gaming facilities leased from GLPI are presented on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation, and the Master Lease is accounted for as a financing obligation. However, for federal and state income tax purposes, the Master Lease is considered an operating lease. As such, the Company does not recognize any tax bases in the leased gaming facilities, which creates basis differences that give rise to deferred income taxes.

Discontinued operations

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $0.4 million and $5.5 million , respectively. These amounts are attributable to the deferred consideration received in the form of a note from the buyer of the equity interests of our subsidiary, which was constructing the Ameristar Lake Charles development project, and to the gain on disposition of excess land associated with our former Boomtown Reno operations.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We generally produce significant positive cash flows from operations, though this is not always reflected in our reported net income (loss) due to large non-cash charges, such as impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets and depreciation. However, our ongoing liquidity will depend on a number of factors, including available cash resources, cash flow from operations, funding of construction of development projects, and our compliance with covenants contained in our debt agreements. As of December 31, 2017 , we held $ 184.2 million of cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2017 , we had $169.2 million drawn on our $400.0 million Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below) and had $9.2 million committed under various letters of credit.
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
Change
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2017 vs. 2016
 
2016 vs. 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
285.8

 
$
255.7

 
$
408.2

 
11.8
 %
 
(37.4
)%
Net cash used in investing activities
$
(80.9
)
 
$
(195.1
)
 
$
(79.9
)
 
(58.5
)%
 
NM

Net cash used in financing activities
$
(205.7
)
 
$
(39.6
)
 
$
(329.0
)
 
NM

 
(88.0
)%
NM — Not Meaningful
Operating Cash Flow
Our net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 , as compared to the prior year, increased due to the Meadows, expenses and other costs associated with the completion of the Spin-Off and Merger incurred in

45


the prior year, and a $71.3 million decrease in interest payments made on long-term debt, offset by an increase in interest payments made on the Master Lease financing obligation of $106.0 million and an increase in lease payments made under the Meadows Lease of $17.5 million. Additionally, net cash payments related to income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased by $8.7 million, as compared to the prior year.
Our net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 , as compared to the prior year, decreased due primarily to the interest payments made on the Master Lease financing obligation of $225.1 million; expenses and other costs associated with the completion of the Spin-Off and Merger, including costs to obtain financing; acquisition costs related to the Meadows; and the timing of payments and receipts of working capital items, offset by a $118.4 million decrease in interest payments made on long-term debt and the increase attributable to improved operating results. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2016 , net cash payments related to income taxes were $12.5 million , as compared to the prior year, in which we received $17.3 million of net cash refunds related to income taxes.
Investing Cash Flow
Our net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased as compared to the prior year and increased for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the prior year, principally as a result of the acquisition of the Meadows on September 9, 2016. The cash paid for the Meadows business, net of cash acquired, was $107.5 million .
The following is a summary of our capital expenditures by segment:
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Midwest segment
$
42.7

 
$
56.3

 
$
45.6

South segment
23.0

 
27.7

 
24.1

West segment
5.7

 
10.6

 
9.9

Other
7.5

 
3.3

 
4.4

Total capital expenditures
$
78.9

 
$
97.9

 
$
84.0


During the year ended December 31, 2016, we received $0.3 million in net proceeds from the disposition of land in Central City, Colorado, and $10.0 million from the collection of deferred consideration in the form of a note receivable relating to the disposition of Ameristar Lake Charles, which was sold in November 2013. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we made our final installment payment of $25.0 million for Belterra Park’s VLT license and received $25.1 million in combined net proceeds from the dispositions of land in Springfield, Massachusetts, and Reno, Nevada, in separate transactions.

Financing Cash Flow

Our intention is to use existing cash resources, expected cash flows from operations and funds available under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities to fund operations, maintain existing facilities, make necessary debt service payments, and make necessary Master Lease and Meadows Lease payments. In the event that our future cash flows from operations do not match the levels we currently anticipate, whether due to downturns in the economy or otherwise, we may need to raise funds through the capital markets, if possible.

Our ability to borrow under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities is contingent upon, among other things, meeting customary financial and other covenants. If we are unable to borrow under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities, or if our operating results are adversely affected because of a reduction in consumer spending, or for any other reason, our ability to maintain our existing facilities or complete our ongoing projects may be affected unless we take measures to find additional financial resources. There is no certainty that we will be able to do so on terms that are favorable to the Company or at all. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Penn National Merger Agreement , we may only incur indebtedness under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, except with the prior written consent of Penn National.
Master Lease Financing Obligation

The Master Lease is accounted for as a financing obligation. At lease inception, the financing obligation was determined to be $3.2 billion and was calculated based on the future minimum lease payments due to GLPI under the Master Lease discounted at 10.5% . For purposes of calculating the financing obligation, beginning in the third year of the lease, the

46


percentage rent (discussed below) was excluded since the payment is contingent upon the achievement of future financial results. The discount rate represented the estimated incremental borrowing rate over the lease term of 35 years , which included renewal options that were reasonably assured of being exercised, at lease inception.

Fourteen of our sixteen gaming facilities are subject to the Master Lease with GLPI. The Master Lease has an initial term of 10 years with five subsequent, five -year renewal periods at our option. The rent, which is payable in monthly installments, is comprised of base rent, which includes a land and a building component, and percentage rent. The land base rent is fixed for the entire lease term. The building base rent is subject to an annual escalation of up to 2% , depending on the Adjusted Revenue to Rent Ratio (as defined in the Master Lease) of 1.8 :1. The percentage rent, which is fixed for the first two years , will be adjusted every two years to establish a new fixed amount for the next two -year period. Each new fixed amount will be calculated by multiplying 4% by the difference between (i) the average net revenues for the trailing two -year period and (ii) $1.1 billion . In May 2017, the building base rent was adjusted by the annual escalation.

As of December 31, 2017 , annual rent under the Master Lease was $382.8 million , which was comprised of the land base rent, the building base rent and the percentage rent, which were $44.1 million , $294.6 million and $44.1 million , respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company made principal payments on the Master Lease financing obligation of $49.8 million and $31.0 million , respectively.
Financing in Connection with the Spin-Off and Merger

In connection with the Spin-Off and Merger, on April 28, 2016, the Company made a dividend to Former Pinnacle in the amount of $808.4 million (the “ Cash Payment ”), which was equal to the amount of existing debt outstanding of Former Pinnacle as of April 28, 2016, less approximately $2.7 billion that GLPI assumed pursuant to the GLPI Merger Agreement. Immediately prior to the consummation of the Spin-Off and Merger, Former Pinnacle’s amended and restated credit agreement (“ Former Senior Secured Credit Facilities ”) was repaid in full and terminated and its 6.375% senior notes due 2021 (“ 6.375% Notes”), 7.50% senior notes due 2021 (“ 7.50% Notes”) and 7.75% senior subordinated notes due 2022 (“ 7.75% Notes”) were redeemed. In addition, Former Pinnacle’s 8.75% senior subordinated notes due 2020 (“ 8.75% Notes”) were redeemed on May 15, 2016. Following the consummation of the Spin-Off and Merger, the Company had no outstanding obligations under the Former Senior Secured Credit Facilities , the 6.375% Notes, the 7.50% Notes, the 7.75% Notes and the 8.75% Notes.

On April 28, 2016, the Company completed its debt financings in connection with the Merger, consisting of (i) $375.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.625% senior notes due 2024 (the “Existing 5.625% Notes”) and (ii) the credit agreement among the Company and certain lenders thereto (the “Credit Agreement”), comprised of (x) a $185.0 million term loan A facility with a maturity of five years (the “Term Loan A Facility”), (y) a $300.0 million term loan B facility with a maturity of seven years (the “Term Loan B Facility”) and (z) a $400.0 million revolving credit facility with a maturity of five years (the “Revolving Credit Facility” and together with the Term Loan A Facility and the Term Loan B Facility, the “Senior Secured Credit Facilities”).

The proceeds of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities, together with the proceeds of the Existing 5.625% Notes were used on April 28, 2016 (i) to make the Cash Payment and (ii) to pay fees and expenses related to the issuance of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the Existing 5.625% Notes. Proceeds from loans under the Revolving Credit Facility are used for working capital, to fund permitted dividends, distributions and acquisitions, for general corporate purposes and for any other purpose not prohibited by the Credit Agreement.
Senior Secured Credit Facilities

As of December 31, 2017 , we had $169.2 million drawn under the Revolving Credit Facility, $152.4 million of loans outstanding under the Term Loan A Facility and $9.2 million committed under various letters of credit. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , we repaid $131.2 million of loans under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities, net of borrowings, which was accomplished principally with cash flows from operations. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company fully repaid the outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan B Facility.

Loans under the Term Loan A Facility and Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, LIBOR plus an applicable margin from 1.50% to 2.50% or the base rate plus an applicable margin from 0.50% to 1.50% , in each case, depending on the Consolidated Total Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) as of the most recent fiscal quarter. Loans under the Term Loan B Facility bore interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, LIBOR plus 3.00% or the base rate plus 2.00% and in no event was LIBOR to be less than 0.75% . In addition, we pay a

47


commitment fee on the unused portion of the commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility at a rate that ranges from 0.30% to 0.50% per annum, depending on the Consolidated Total Net Leverage Ratio as of the most recent fiscal quarter.

The Term Loan A Facility amortizes in equal quarterly amounts equal to a percentage of the original outstanding principal amount at closing as follows: (i) 5% per annum in the first two years, (ii) 7.5% per annum in the third year and (iii) 10% per annum in the fourth and fifth year. The remaining principal amount is payable on April 28, 2021. The voluntary repayments we made during the year ended December 31, 2017 have satisfied the quarterly amortization payments that were otherwise due during the year ending December 31, 2018. The Term Loan B Facility amortized in equal quarterly amounts equal to 1% per annum of the original outstanding principal amount at closing. The Revolving Credit Facility is not subject to amortization and is due and payable on April 28, 2021.

Loans under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities may be prepaid at par and commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility may be reduced at any time, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty (except for LIBOR breakage costs). Loans under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities are subject to mandatory prepayment with (i) a percentage of the Company’s excess cash flow depending on the Consolidated Total Net Leverage Ratio of the Company, (ii) net cash proceeds from asset sales and casualty and condemnation events (subject to customary reinvestment rights and other customary exceptions) and (iii) net cash proceeds from the issuance or incurrence of indebtedness after the closing date (subject to customary exceptions).

All obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities are unconditionally guaranteed by each of the Company’s existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain customary exceptions. All obligations of the Company under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the guarantees of those obligations are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Company and the guarantors thereto, subject to certain exceptions. The property pledged by the Company and such guarantors includes a first priority pledge of the leasehold interests of tenant in the Master Lease; a first priority pledge of all of the equity interests owned by the Company and such guarantors in the direct wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries of the Company and such guarantors.

The Credit Agreement contains, among other things, certain affirmative and negative covenants and, solely for the benefit of the lenders under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities, financial covenants, including (1) maximum permitted Consolidated Total Net Leverage Ratio of 3.75 to 1.00; (2) maximum permitted Consolidated Senior Secured Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of 2.50 to 1.00; and (3) required minimum Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of 2.50 to 1.00. The Credit Agreement also contains certain customary events of default, including the occurrence of a change of control, revocation of material licenses by gaming authorities (subject to a cure period), termination of the Master Lease and cross-default to certain events of default under the Master Lease.

As of December 31, 2017 , we were in compliance with the financial covenant ratios under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and compliance with these financial covenant ratios does not have a material impact on our financial flexibility, including our ability to incur new indebtedness based on our operating plans.

5.625% Notes

The Existing 5.625% Notes were issued at par, mature on May 1, 2024, and bear interest at the rate of 5.625% per annum. Interest on the Existing 5.625% Notes is payable semi-annually on May 1st and November 1st of each year. On October 12, 2016, we issued an additional $125.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.625% senior notes due 2024 (the “Additional 5.625% Notes” and together with the Existing 5.625% Notes, the “5.625% Notes”), under the bond indenture governing the Existing 5.625% Notes issued on April 28, 2016, as amended and supplemented by that certain first supplemental indenture, dated as of October 12, 2016. The Additional 5.625% Notes were issued at par plus a premium of 50 basis points. We financed the purchase of the Meadows with our Revolving Credit Facility and the net proceeds from the issuance of the Additional 5.625% Notes were used to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. The 5.625% Notes were issued pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In June 2017, we filed a registration statement with the SEC to offer to exchange the 5.625% Notes for a new issuance of registered 5.625% Notes, which was declared effective by the SEC in July 2017. The offer to exchange closed in August 2017.

The Company may redeem the 5.625% Notes at any time, and from time to time, on or after May 1, 2019, at the declining redemption premiums set forth in the indenture, together with accrued and unpaid interest. Prior to May 1, 2019, the Company may redeem the 5.625% Notes at any time, and from time to time, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 5.625% Notes redeemed plus a “make-whole” redemption premium described in the indenture, together with accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, at any time prior to May 1, 2019, the Company may redeem the 5.625% Notes with an amount of cash equal to the net proceeds of one or more equity offerings, within a specified period of time after the closing of any such equity offering, at a redemption price equal to 105.625% of the principal amount of the 5.625% Notes redeemed, together with

48


accrued and unpaid interest, so long as at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the 5.625% Notes originally issued under the indenture remains outstanding. If the Company engages in any asset sales, subject to certain exceptions, the Company generally must use the proceeds for specified purposes within a specified period of time or use the excess net proceeds from such asset sales to offer to purchase the 5.625% Notes from holders at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 5.625% Notes, together with accrued and unpaid interest.

The 5.625% Notes are the Company’s senior unsecured obligations and rank pari passu in right of payment with all of the Company’s senior unsecured indebtedness, and senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s subordinated indebtedness, without giving effect to collateral arrangements. The 5.625% Notes are effectively subordinated to the Company’s secured indebtedness, including the Senior Secured Credit Facilities, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The 5.625% Notes are not guaranteed by any of the Company’s subsidiaries, except in the event that the Company in the future incurs certain subsidiary-guaranteed unsecured indebtedness, and, therefore, the 5.625% Notes are structurally subordinated to all liabilities of the Company’s subsidiaries, including their guarantees of the Company’s Senior Secured Credit Facilities.

The indenture contains covenants limiting the Company’s and its restricted subsidiaries’ ability to: pay dividends or distributions or repurchase equity; incur additional debt or issue disqualified stock and, in the case of subsidiaries, preferred stock; make investments; create liens on assets to secure certain debt; enter into transactions with affiliates; merge or consolidate with another company; transfer and sell assets; create dividend and other payment restrictions affecting subsidiaries; designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries; and make certain amendments to the Master Lease. These covenants are subject to a number of important and significant limitations, qualifications and exceptions.

Events of default under the indenture include, among others, the following: default for 30 days in the payment when due of interest on the 5.625% Notes; default in payment when due of the principal of, or premium, if any, on the 5.625% Notes; failure to comply with covenants in the indenture for 60 days after the receipt of notice from the trustee or holders of 25% in aggregate principal amount of the 5.625% Notes (unless such failure to comply has been waived); acceleration or payment default of debt in excess of a specified amount; unpaid judgments in excess of a specified amount; certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency; and the Master Lease terminating or ceasing to be effective in certain circumstances.

Share Repurchase Programs

In May 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $50.0 million of our common stock, which we completed in July 2016. In August 2016, our Board of Directors authorized an additional share repurchase program of up to $50.0 million of our common stock. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we repurchased 1.1 million shares of common stock for $22.3 million and 6.2 million shares of common stock for $70.2 million , respectively. In December 2017, the Company canceled the additional share repurchase program and at that time, we had repurchased 2.8 million shares of common stock for $42.4 million .


49


CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and other commitments as of December 31, 2017 :
 
 
 
 
Less than
 
 
 
 
 
More than
 
 
 
 
Total
 
1 year
 
1-3 years
 
3-5 years
 
5 years
 
Other
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Long-term debt obligations (a)
 
$
1,040.2

 
$
39.1

 
$
105.2

 
$
353.7

 
$
542.2

 
$

Long-term financing obligation (b)
 
11,108.3

 
347.3

 
665.8

 
665.8

 
9,429.4

 

Operating lease obligations (c)
 
695.7

 
35.2

 
50.6

 
50.5

 
559.4

 

Purchase obligations: (d)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction contractual obligations (e)
 
13.1

 
13.1

 

 

 

 

Other (f)
 
76.2

 
63.1

 
9.9

 
3.1

 
0.1

 

Other long-term liabilities reflected on the registrant’s balance sheet under GAAP (g)
 
25.2

 
0.9

 
10.3

 
1.1

 
8.3

 
4.6

Total
 
$
12,958.7

 
$
498.7

 
$
841.8

 
$
1,074.2

 
$
10,539.4

 
$
4.6

(a)
Includes interest obligations through the debt maturity dates associated with the debt obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2017 .
(b)
Represents the remaining undiscounted minimum lease payments due to GLPI through the end of the 35-year term, which includes all renewal options, of the Master Lease. The amounts above exclude contingent payments.
(c)
For those lease obligations in which annual rent includes both a minimum lease payment and a percentage of future revenue, the table reflects only the known minimum lease obligation. In addition, the table reflects all renewal options for those lease obligations that have multiple renewal periods. Future renewal periods beyond the term of the Master Lease of ground leases and the water bottom leases in Louisiana have been excluded as these are the responsibility of GLPI beyond the term of the Master Lease.
(d)
Purchase obligations represent agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding.
(e)
Includes obligations related to various construction projects.
(f)
Includes open purchase orders and commitments and service agreements.
(g)
Includes executive deferred compensation, potential uncertain tax position liabilities and other long-term obligations. The amount included in the “Other” column includes uncertain tax position liabilities for which we are unable to make a reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement with the taxing authority.
The table above excludes certain commitments as of December 31, 2017 , for which the timing of expenditures associated with such commitments is unknown, or contractual agreements have not been executed, or the guaranteed maximum price for such contractual agreements has not been agreed upon.

50


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The Consolidated Financial Statements were prepared in conformity with GAAP. Certain of the accounting policies require management to apply significant judgment in defining the estimates and assumptions for calculating financial estimates. These judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Management’s judgments are based on our historical experience, terms of various past and present agreements and contracts, industry trends, and information available from other sources, as appropriate. There can be no assurance that actual results will be similar to these estimates. Changes in these estimates could adversely affect our financial position or our results of operations.

We have determined that the following accounting policies and related estimates are critical to the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements :

Land, buildings, vessels, equipment and other long-lived assets: As of December 31, 2017 , our net land, buildings, vessels and equipment was $2,629.0 million , which represented 66.6% of our total assets. As a result of the Spin-Off and Merger, substantially all of the land, buildings, vessels and associated improvements used in the Company’s operations and included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets are subject to the Master Lease and owned by GLPI. Furthermore, these assets continue to be depreciated consistent with treatment prior to the Spin-Off and Merger.

Judgments are made in determining the estimated useful lives of assets, the salvage values to be assigned to assets and if, or when, an asset has been impaired. The accuracy of these estimates affects the amount of depreciation expense recognized in our results of operations and whether to record a gain or loss on disposition of an asset.

We review the carrying amount of our land, buildings, vessels and equipment used in our operations whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable from estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. Adverse industry or economic trends, lower projections of profitability, or a sustained decline in our market capitalization, among other items, may be indications of potential impairment issues, which are triggering events requiring the testing of an asset’s carrying amount for recoverability. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying amount, no impairment is indicated. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying amount, then an impairment is recorded based on the fair value of the asset.

There are three generally accepted approaches available in developing an opinion of value, the cost approach, which is the price a prudent investor would pay to produce or construct a similar new item; the sales comparison approach, which is typically used for land valuations by analyzing recent sales transactions of similar sites; and the income approach, which is based on a discounted cash flow model using the estimated future results of the relevant reporting unit discounted using our weighted-average cost of capital and market indicators of terminal year free cash flow multiples. If necessary, we solicit third-party valuation expertise to assist in the valuation of our assets. We apply the most indicative approach to the overall valuation, or in some cases, a weighted analysis of any or all of these methods. The determination of fair value uses accounting judgments and estimates, including market conditions, and the reliability is dependent upon the availability and comparability of the market data uncovered, as well as the decision making criteria used by market participants when evaluating a property. Changes in estimates or application of alternative assumptions could produce significantly different results.

Goodwill: As of December 31, 2017 , our goodwill was $610.9 million , which represented 15.5% of our total assets. We perform our annual assessment for impairment in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year (October 1st test date), or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Adverse industry or economic trends, lower projections of profitability, or a sustained decline in our market capitalization, among other items, may be indicators of possible impairment, which would require an interim assessment for impairment. Goodwill is allocated among and evaluated for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. We view each of our operating businesses as an operating segment with the exception of our two businesses in Jackpot, Nevada, which we view as one operating segment. We consider each of our operating segments to be separate reporting units.

Goodwill is tested for impairment using a qualitative and/or quantitative test. If, after assessing the qualitative factors, an entity determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill, the quantitative test is not necessary. However, if, after assessing the qualitative factors, an entity determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the quantitative test must be performed. The quantitative test is used to identify both the existence of impairment and the amount of the impairment charge, if any. The impairment charge, if any, is equal to the amount by which the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit

51


and after consideration of income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit, if applicable.

Qualitative factors include macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance, among others. These factors require significant judgment and estimates, and application of alternative assumptions could produce significantly different results. Evaluations of possible impairment utilizing the quantitative approach require us to estimate, among other factors, forecasts of future operating results, revenue growth, profit margin, tax rates, capital expenditures, depreciation, working capital, weighted average cost of capital, long-term growth rates, risk premiums, terminal values and fair market values of our reporting units. In determining the carrying amount of our reporting units, we allocate each reporting unit that is subject to the Master Lease a pro-rata portion of the financing obligation based on the reporting unit’s Adjusted EBITDAR as a percentage of the aggregate Adjusted EBITDAR of all reporting units that are subject to the Master Lease. We believe this allocation is reasonable as it is consistent with our reporting unit fair values and with terms contained in the Master Lease. Changes in estimates or the application of alternative assumptions could produce significantly different results. If necessary, we may solicit third-party valuation expertise to assist in the valuation of our goodwill.

Although our annual impairment test performed as of October 1, 2017 did not result in any goodwill impairment charges, the goodwill of certain reporting units may be at-risk for future impairment, particularly those reporting units which were recently impaired or acquired. For example, during the year ended December 31, 2016, as a result of the Spin-Off and Merger, we recorded goodwill impairment at several of our reporting units that became subject to the Master Lease. In addition, we acquired the Meadows on September 9, 2016. As of December 31, 2017 , the carrying amount of the goodwill of reporting units that were impaired or acquired during the year ended December 31, 2016 was $134.7 million. In addition, as of December 31, 2017 , the aggregate carrying amount of goodwill at reporting units, which had negative carrying amounts, was $22.8 million. The negative carrying amounts at certain reporting units is principally due to the allocation of the Master Lease financing obligation, which is discussed above.

Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets:   As of December 31, 2017 , our indefinite-lived intangible assets were $371.3 million , which represented 9.4% of our total assets. Our indefinite-lived intangible assets include gaming licenses, a racing license and trade names, which are not subject to amortization, but instead are reviewed annually for impairment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year (October 1st test date), or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. The determination that our gaming licenses have indefinite lives is based primarily on our expectation to operate our gaming facilities indefinitely, including the fact that renewal is expected to occur without substantial cost and without material modification to the terms and conditions of the licenses. Trade names have been determined to have indefinite lives based primarily on the fact that we expect to continue the use of these trade names in the operations of our gaming facilities for the foreseeable future and there are no specific factors limiting their useful lives.

We have the option to perform the impairment test by qualitatively assessing events and circumstances that have occurred since the last quantitative test. Under the qualitative assessment, we consider both positive and negative factors, including macroeconomic conditions, industry events, financial performance and other changes, and make a determination of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset being tested is less than its carrying amount. These factors require significant judgment and estimates, and application of alternative assumptions could produce significantly different results. If it is more likely than not that the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than the carrying amount, we are required to perform a quantitative assessment to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset.

If the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, an impairment charge is recognized equal to the difference. Fair value is calculated using a discounted cash flows approach, using the estimated future results of the relevant reporting unit discounted using our weighted average cost of capital and market indicators of terminal year free cash flow multiples. Changes in estimates or the application of alternative assumptions including among other factors, forecasts of future operating results, revenue growth, profit margin, tax rates, capital expenditures, depreciation, working capital, weighted average cost of capital, long-term growth rates, and risk premiums produce significantly different results. If necessary, we may solicit third-party valuation expertise to assist in the valuation of our indefinite-lived intangible assets.

Although our annual impairment test performed as of October 1, 2017 did not result in any impairment charges to gaming licenses or trade names, certain of our gaming licenses and trade names may be at-risk for future impairment, particularly those which were recently impaired or acquired. For example, during the year ended December 31, 2016, principally as a result of the Spin-Off and Merger, we recorded impairment pertaining to several of our gaming licenses and trade names. In addition, we acquired the Meadows on September 9, 2016. As of December 31, 2017 , the carrying amounts of gaming licenses and trade names that were impaired during the year ended December 31, 2016 were $82.5 million and $93.5 million, respectively. The

52


carrying amounts of gaming licenses and trade names at the Meadows were $56.3 million and $15.0 million , respectively, as of December 31, 2017 .

Self-insurance Reserves: We are self-insured up to certain limits for costs associated with general liability, workers’ compensation and employee medical coverage. Self-insurance reserves include accruals of estimated settlements for known claims (“Case Reserves”), as well as accruals of estimates for claims incurred but not yet reported (“IBNR”). Case Reserves represent estimated liabilities for unpaid losses, based on a claims administrator’s estimates of future payments on individual reported claims, including Loss Adjustment Expenses (“LAE”). Generally, LAE includes claims settlement costs directly assigned to specific claims, such as legal fees. We estimate Case Reserves and LAE on a combined basis, but do not include claim administration costs in our estimated ultimate loss reserves. IBNR includes the provision for unreported claims, changes in case reserves, and future payments on reopened claims.

Key variables and assumptions include (but are not limited to) loss development factors, trend factors and the expected loss rates/ratios used. These loss development factors and trend factors are developed using our actual historical losses. It is possible that reasonable alternative selections would produce materially different reserve estimates. We believe the estimates of future liability are reasonable based upon this methodology; however, changes in key variables and assumptions, or generally in health care costs, accident frequency and severity could materially affect the estimate for these reserves.

Income Tax Assets and Liabilities: We utilize estimates related to cash flow projections for the realization of deferred income tax assets. The estimates are based upon recent operating results and budgets for future operating results. We consider the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in this assessment.

We assess tax positions using a two-step process. A tax position is recognized if it meets a “more likely than not” threshold, and is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. We review uncertain tax positions at each balance sheet date. Liabilities we record as a result of this analysis are recorded separately from any deferred income tax accounts, and are classified as either current, within “Other accrued liabilities,” or long-term, within “Other long-term liabilities,” based on the timing of expected payment.

We assess the tax uncertainties on a quarterly basis and maintain the required tax reserves until the underlying issue is effectively settled or upon the expiration of the statute of limitations. Our estimate of the potential outcome of any uncertain tax issue is highly subjective; however, we believe we have adequately provided for any reasonable and foreseeable outcomes related to uncertain tax matters.

Share-based Compensation: Share-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the requisite service period. Determination of the fair values of share-based payment awards at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating the expected term of the relevant share-based payment awards and the expected volatility of our stock. Additionally, we must estimate the amount of share-based payment awards that are expected to be forfeited. The expected term of share-based payment awards represents the period of time that the share-based payment awards are expected to be outstanding and was determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the awards, vesting schedules and expectation of future employee behavior. Any changes in these highly subjective assumptions may significantly impact the share-based compensation expense for the future.

Guest Loyalty Programs: We currently offer incentives to our guests through our my choice program. Under the my choice program, guests earn points based on their level of play that may be redeemed for various benefits, such as cash back, dining, or hotel stays, among others. The reward credit balance under the plan will be forfeited if the guest does not earn any reward credits over the prior six-month period. In addition, based on their level of play, guests can earn additional benefits without redeeming points, such as a car lease, among other items. In January 2018, the Company implemented the my choice program at Meadows, which previously operated its own guest loyalty program.

Prior to the adoption of ASC 606 (as defined in “ Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements ” below), we accrued a liability for the estimated cost of providing these benefits as the benefits were earned. Estimates and assumptions were made regarding cost of providing the benefits, breakage rates, and the mix of goods and services guests would choose. We used historical data to assist in the determination of estimated accruals. Subsequent to the adoption of ASC 606, we accrue a liability based on the estimated standalone selling price of the loyalty credits that are earned by our guests. Estimates and assumptions are made regarding standalone selling prices of the goods and services redeemable for loyalty credits, breakage rates, and the mix of goods and services guests will choose. Changes in estimates or guest redemption habits could produce different results.

Application of Business Combination Accounting: We allocate the business combination purchase price to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values. The excess of the purchase price over

53


those fair values is recorded as goodwill. We determined the fair value of identifiable intangible assets such as customer relationships, trademarks and any other significant tangible assets or liabilities, such as long-lived property. The fair value allocation methodology requires management to make assumptions and apply judgment to estimate the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities assumed. Management estimates the fair value of assets and liabilities primarily using discounted cash flows and replacement cost analysis.

The provisional fair value measurements of acquired assets and liabilities assumed may be retrospectively adjusted during the measurement period. The measurement period ends once we are able to determine that we have obtained all necessary information that existed as of the acquisition date or once we determine that such information is unavailable. The measurement period does not extend beyond one year from the acquisition date.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which introduced a new standard related to revenue recognition, ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606” or the “new revenue standard”). Under ASC 606, recognition of revenue occurs when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the new revenue standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. ASC 606 was to be adopted using either a full retrospective approach for all periods presented in the period of adoption or a modified retrospective approach. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers - Deferral of the Effective Date , which deferred the implementation of ASC 606 to be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Principal versus Agent Considerations , which clarified the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations in the new revenue standard pursuant to ASU No. 2014-09. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing , and in May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, which amended certain aspects of the new revenue standard pursuant to ASU No. 2014-09. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-19 and ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements , which further clarified and corrected certain elements of ASC 606.

The Company had previously disclosed that it expected to adopt ASC 606 using the full retrospective approach. However, during the fourth quarter 2017, due to changes in facts and circumstances, particularly the Proposed Company Sale to Penn National, we changed our transition method to the modified retrospective approach. Unlike the full retrospective approach, the modified retrospective approach does not require the Company to recast the prior period consolidated financial statements. Instead, the modified retrospective approach requires the Company to provide disclosures in the notes that accompany the consolidated financial statements describing the financial statement line items impacted by the new revenue standard. We adopted ASC 606 during the first quarter 2018 using the modified retrospective approach to all contracts as of the date of initial application, which was January 1, 2018.

The Company has concluded that the adoption of the new revenue standard principally affects (1) how we measure the liability associated with our my choice program and (2) the classification and, as it relates to lodging, the measurement, of revenues and expenses between gaming; food and beverage; lodging; and retail, entertainment and other.

Under our my choice program, guests earn points based on their level of play, which may be redeemed for various benefits, such as cash back, dining, or hotel stays, among others. Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, we determined our liability for unredeemed points based on the estimated costs of services or merchandise to be provided and estimated redemption rates. Upon adoption of ASC 606, points awarded under our my choice program are considered a material right given to players based on their gaming play and the promise to provide points to players is required to be accounted for as a separate performance obligation. In addition, certain tier benefits associated with our my choice program, represent material rights in a manner similar to player points, which results in such benefits constituting separate performance obligations. Therefore, ASC 606 requires us to allocate the revenues associated with the players’ activity between gaming revenue and the value of the points and certain tier benefits, if applicable. The measurement of the liability is based on the estimated standalone selling price of the points earned after factoring in the likelihood of redemption. The revenue associated with the points earned will be recognized in the period in which they are redeemed.

In addition to the above, prior to the adoption of ASC 606, complimentary revenues pertaining to food and beverage; lodging; and retail, entertainment and other; were excluded from the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the estimated costs of providing such complimentary goods and services were included as gaming expenses in the Consolidated Statements of

54


Operations. However, subsequent to the adoption of ASC 606, food and beverage, lodging and other services furnished to our guests on a complimentary basis will be measured at the estimated standalone selling prices and included as revenues within food and beverage; lodging; and retail, entertainment and other; as appropriate, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, which will result in a corresponding decrease in gaming revenues. Furthermore, specifically as it relates to lodging, the transition from complimentary retail value to estimated standalone selling price will increase the recorded amount of lodging complimentary revenue. Additionally, subsequent to the adoption of ASC 606, the costs of providing such complimentary goods and services will be included as expenses within food and beverage; lodging; and retail, entertainment and other; as appropriate, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, which will result in a decrease in gaming expenses.

The amounts relating to promotional allowances and estimated costs of providing complimentary goods and services for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, are presented tabularly under “Revenue Recognition” in Note 1, “Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements . Lastly, we expect that the cumulative effect adjustment to our accumulated deficit upon adoption of ASC 606 will not be significant. Adoption of the new revenue standard will also result in additional revenue-related disclosures in the footnotes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities , which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter 2018 and it did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Recognition and Measurement of Leases . Under the new guidance, for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases), at the commencement date, lessees will be required to recognize a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis, and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Further, the new lease guidance simplifies the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and liabilities, which no longer provides a source for off balance sheet financing. The effective date for this update is for the annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. Lessees and lessors must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements.

The Company currently anticipates adopting this accounting standard during the first quarter 2019. Operating leases, including the Meadows Lease, our ground leases at certain properties, and agreements relating to slot machines, will be recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as a right-of-use asset with a corresponding lease liability, which will represent the present value of the lease payments to be made over the lease term. Additionally, as a result of this ASU, the Company will be required to reassess whether the Spin-Off and Merger transactions qualified for sale-leaseback accounting treatment. The full qualitative and quantitative effects of these changes have not yet been determined and are still being analyzed.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Accounting for Credit Losses , which amends the guidance on the impairment of financial instruments. This update adds an impairment model (known as the current expected credit losses model) that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes, as an allowance, its estimate of expected credit losses. The effective date for this update is for the annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new guidance on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments , which amended the current accounting standard to add or clarify guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows in order to reduce the diversity in practice of certain types of cash flows where consistent principles previously did not exist. Further, in November 2016, the FASB issued No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash , which amended the existing accounting standard to require the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in total cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents, which was intended to reduce the diversity in practice caused by the lack of specificity in the existing accounting standard regarding the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter 2018 using a retrospective transition approach and it did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business , which amended the guidance of the definition of a business, which affected many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill and

55


consolidation. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter 2018 using a prospective transition approach and it did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Scope of Modification Accounting , which provided clarity and intended to reduce both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation . More specifically, ASU No. 2017-09 provided guidance on which changes to the terms and conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter 2018 using a prospective transition approach and it did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Leases (Topic 840), and Leases (Topic 842) , which makes amendments to the SEC paragraphs pursuant to the staff announcement at the July 20, 2017 Emerging Issues Task Force meeting and rescinds prior SEC staff announcements and observer comments. To the extent this guidance is applicable, it is effective immediately. As discussed above, as of December 31, 2017, the Company had not yet adopted ASC Topics 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers , and 842, Leases ; however, ASC 606 was adopted by the Company during the first quarter 2018. The guidance applicable to the Company in this ASU did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

56


Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from adverse changes in interest rates with respect to the short-term floating interest rate on borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities. As of December 31, 2017 , we had $169.2 million drawn under our Revolving Credit Facility and had $9.2 million committed under various letters of credit. In addition, as of December 31, 2017 , we had $152.4 million of principal outstanding under the Term Loan A Facility.
Loans under the Term Loan A Facility and Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, LIBOR plus an applicable margin from 1.50% to 2.50% or the base rate plus an applicable margin from 0.50% to 1.50% , in each case, depending on the Consolidated Total Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) as of the most recent fiscal quarter.
As of December 31, 2017 , for every 50 basis points decrease in LIBOR, our annual interest expense would decrease by approximately $1.6 million and our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $1.6 million for every 50 basis points increase in LIBOR, assuming constant debt levels.
The table below provides the principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by contractual maturity dates for our debt obligations as of December 31, 2017 . As of December 31, 2017 , we did not hold any material investments in market-risk-sensitive instruments of the type described in Item 305 of Regulation S-K.

 
2018
 
2019
 
2020
 
2021
 
2022
 
Thereafter
 
Total
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
Revolving Credit Facility
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
169,250

 
$

 
$

 
$
169,250

 
$
165,865

Interest Rate
3.24
%
 
3.24
%
 
3.24
%
 
3.24
%
 

 

 
3.24
%
 
 
Term Loan A Facility
$

 
$
9,062

 
$
18,500

 
$
124,875

 
$

 
$

 
$
152,437

 
$
152,437

Interest Rate
3.24
%
 
3.24
%
 
3.24
%
 
3.24
%
 

 

 
3.24
%
 
 
5.625% Notes
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
500,000

 
$
500,000

 
$
535,800

Interest Rate
5.625
%
 
5.625
%
 
5.625
%
 
5.625
%
 
5.625
%
 
5.625
%
 
5.625
%
 
 
Other
$
9

 
$
9

 
$
11

 
$
11

 
$
13

 
$
16

 
$
69

 
$
69

Interest Rate
10.00
%
 
10.00
%
 
10.00
%
 
10.00
%
 
10.00
%
 
10.00
%
 
10.00
%
 
 



57

Table of Contents

Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 , and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 2017 and 2016 , and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 , in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 , based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated March 1, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2009.
 
Las Vegas, Nevada
March 1, 2018

58


PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
Gaming
$
2,286,881

 
$
2,128,026

 
$
2,048,272

Food and beverage
133,082

 
126,927

 
125,775

Lodging
51,671

 
50,745

 
50,961

Retail, entertainment and other
90,214

 
73,157

 
66,840

Total revenues
2,561,848

 
2,378,855

 
2,291,848

Expenses and other costs:
 
 
 
 
 
Gaming
1,243,187

 
1,135,951

 
1,094,803

Food and beverage
126,506

 
120,791

 
118,323

Lodging
25,430

 
24,895

 
25,001

Retail, entertainment and other
40,327

 
28,483

 
28,426

General and administrative
455,525

 
454,790

 
426,064

Depreciation and amortization
217,025

 
218,366

 
242,550

Pre-opening, development and other costs
9,478

 
55,980

 
14,247

Impairment of goodwill

 
322,457

 
4,757

Impairment of other intangible assets

 
146,500

 
33,845

Write-downs, reserves and recoveries, net
15,750

 
16,967

 
2,666

Total expenses and other costs
2,133,228

 
2,525,180

 
1,990,682

Operating income (loss)
428,620

 
(146,325
)
 
301,166

Interest expense, net
(380,859
)
 
(334,293
)
 
(244,408
)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
(516
)
 
(5,207
)
 

Loss from equity method investment
(90
)
 
(90
)
 
(83
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
47,155

 
(485,915
)
 
56,675

Income tax benefit (expense)
14,603

 
28,035

 
(14,560
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
61,758

 
(457,880
)
 
42,115

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 
433

 
5,494

Net income (loss)
61,758

 
(457,447
)
 
47,609

Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest
1,346

 
37

 
1,278

Net income (loss) attributable to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.
$
63,104

 
$
(457,410
)
 
$
48,887

Net income (loss) per common share—basic
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
1.12

 
$
(7.80
)
 
$
0.71

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 
0.01

 
0.09

Net income (loss) per common share—basic
$
1.12

 
$
(7.79
)
 
$
0.80

Net income (loss) per common share—diluted
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
1.02

 
$
(7.80
)
 
$
0.68

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 
0.01

 
0.09

Net income (loss) per common share—diluted
$
1.02

 
$
(7.79
)
 
$
0.77

Number of shares—basic
56,518

 
58,741

 
61,030

Number of shares—diluted
61,911

 
58,741

 
63,321

See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements .


59

Table of Contents


PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(amounts in thousands)

 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Net income (loss)
$
61,758

 
$
(457,447
)
 
$
47,609

Post-retirement benefit obligations, net of income taxes
(62
)
 
(82
)
 
276

Comprehensive income (loss)
61,696

 
(457,529
)
 
47,885

Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest
1,346

 
37

 
1,278

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.
$
63,042

 
$
(457,492
)
 
$
49,163

See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements .



60

Table of Contents


PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(amounts in thousands, except share data)
 
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
ASSETS
 
 
 
Current Assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
184,218

 
$
185,093

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6,167 and $5,282
53,998

 
42,997

Inventories
10,145

 
9,967

Prepaid expenses and other assets
21,944

 
17,760

Total current assets
270,305

 
255,817

Land, buildings, vessels and equipment, net
2,629,013

 
2,768,491

Goodwill
610,889

 
610,889

Other intangible assets, net
383,569

 
392,398

Deferred income taxes
1,468

 

Other assets, net
54,984

 
49,472

Total assets
$
3,950,228

 
$
4,077,067

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
 
 
 
Current Liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
81,071

 
$
69,069

Accrued interest
5,401

 
5,286

Accrued compensation
74,204

 
72,939

Accrued taxes
56,538

 
58,207

Current portion of long-term debt
9

 
12,258

Current portion of long-term financing obligation
24,658

 
49,770

Other accrued liabilities
89,141

 
91,062

Total current liabilities
331,022

 
358,591

Long-term debt less current portion
812,315

 
924,442

Long-term financing obligation less current portion
3,088,871

 
3,113,529

Deferred income taxes

 
13,242

Other long-term liabilities
38,991

 
40,143

Total liabilities
4,271,199

 
4,449,947

Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

 

Stockholders’ Deficit:
 
 
 
Preferred stock—$0.01 par value, 250,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding

 

Common stock—$0.01 par value, 150,000,000 authorized, 57,629,392 and 55,812,425 shares issued and outstanding, net of treasury shares
650

 
620

Additional paid-in capital
932,246

 
919,974

Accumulated deficit
(1,170,715
)
 
(1,233,819
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
264

 
326

Treasury stock, at cost, 7,371,080 and 6,209,541 of treasury shares
(92,511
)
 
(70,166
)
Total Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. stockholders’ deficit
(330,066
)
 
(383,065
)
Non-controlling interest
9,095

 
10,185

Total stockholders’ deficit
(320,971
)
 
(372,880
)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
$
3,950,228

 
$
4,077,067


See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

61

Table of Contents

PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(amounts in thousands)

 
Capital Stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of Shares
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Accumulated
Deficit
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total Pinnacle Stockholders’
Equity (Deficit)
 
Non-Controlling Interest
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity (Deficit)
Balance as of January 1, 2015
59,980

 
$
6,635

 
$
1,096,508

 
$
(754,206
)
 
$
132

 
$
(71,090
)
 
$
277,979

 
$
11,403

 
$
289,382

Net income (loss)

 

 

 
48,887

 

 

 
48,887

 
(1,278
)
 
47,609

Post-retirement benefit obligations, net of income taxes

 

 

 

 
276

 

 
276

 

 
276

Comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
47,885

Share-based compensation

 

 
17,789

 

 

 

 
17,789

 

 
17,789

Common stock issuance and option exercises
891

 
89

 
9,782

 

 

 

 
9,871

 

 
9,871

Tax benefit from stock option exercises

 

 
315

 

 

 

 
315

 

 
315

Tax withholdings on share-based payment awards

 

 
(1,733
)
 

 

 

 
(1,733
)
 

 
(1,733
)
Balance as of December 31, 2015
60,871

 
6,724

 
1,122,661

 
(705,319
)
 
408

 
(71,090
)
 
353,384

 
10,125

 
363,509

Net loss

 

 

 
(457,410
)
 

 

 
(457,410
)
 
(37
)
 
(457,447
)
Post-retirement benefit obligations, net of income taxes

 

 

 

 
(82
)
 

 
(82
)
 

 
(82
)
Comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(457,529
)
Share-based compensation

 

 
35,470

 

 

 

 
35,470

 

 
35,470

Impact of Spin-Off and Merger, net

 
(6,134
)
 
(239,798
)
 
(71,090
)
 

 
71,090

 
(245,932
)
 

 
(245,932
)
Common stock issuance and option exercises
1,151

 
30

 
2,313

 

 

 

 
2,343

 

 
2,343

Repurchases of common stock
(6,210
)
 

 

 

 

 
(70,166
)
 
(70,166
)
 

 
(70,166
)
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
97

 
97

Tax benefit from stock option exercises

 

 
1,051

 

 

 

 
1,051

 

 
1,051

Tax withholdings on share-based payment awards

 

 
(1,723
)
 

 

 

 
(1,723
)
 

 
(1,723
)
Balance as of December 31, 2016
55,812

 
620

 
919,974

 
(1,233,819
)
 
326

 
(70,166
)
 
(383,065
)
 
10,185

 
(372,880
)
Net income (loss)

 

 

 
63,104

 

 

 
63,104

 
(1,346
)
 
61,758

Post-retirement benefit obligations, net of income taxes

 

 

 

 
(62
)
 

 
(62
)
 

 
(62
)
Comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
61,696

Share-based compensation

 

 
14,704

 

 

 

 
14,704

 

 
14,704

Common stock issuance and option exercises
2,978

 
30

 
4,657

 

 

 

 
4,687

 

 
4,687

Forfeiture of restricted stock awards
(16
)
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchases of common stock
(1,145
)
 

 

 

 

 
(22,345
)
 
(22,345
)
 

 
(22,345
)
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
256

 
256

Tax withholdings on share-based payment awards

 

 
(7,089
)
 

 

 

 
(7,089
)
 

 
(7,089
)
Balance as of December 31, 2017
57,629

 
$
650

 
$
932,246

 
$
(1,170,715
)
 
$
264

 
$
(92,511
)
 
$
(330,066
)
 
$
9,095

 
$
(320,971
)
See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

62

Table of Contents

PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(amounts in thousands)
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
61,758

 
$
(457,447
)
 
$
47,609

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
217,025

 
218,366

 
242,550

Loss (gain) on sales or disposals of long-lived assets, net
10,159

 
16,229

 
(4,526
)
Loss from equity method investment
90

 
90

 
83

Loss on early extinguishment of debt
516

 
5,207

 

Impairment of goodwill

 
322,457

 
4,757

Impairment of other intangible assets

 
146,500

 
33,845

Impairment of held-to-maturity securities
3,844

 

 

Impairment of long-lived assets
47

 
238

 
4,061

Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discounts/premiums
7,826

 
7,292

 
12,375

Share-based compensation expense
14,704

 
35,470

 
17,789

Change in income taxes
(19,328
)
 
(42,381
)
 
32,288

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Receivables, net
(11,221
)
 
(6,599
)
 
(4,740
)
Prepaid expenses, inventories and other
(9,259
)
 
1,219

 
14,773

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
9,639

 
9,106

 
7,362

Net cash provided by operating activities
285,800

 
255,747

 
408,226

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Capital expenditures
(78,941
)
 
(97,932
)
 
(84,032
)
Payment for business combination, net of cash acquired

 
(107,509
)
 

Proceeds from sales of furniture, fixtures and equipment
147

 
149

 
436

Net proceeds from dispositions of assets held for sale

 
10,325

 
25,066

Purchase of other intangible asset

 

 
(25,000
)
Restricted cash
596

 
1,371

 
5,667

Loans receivable
(2,750
)
 
(1,500
)
 
(2,075
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(80,948
)
 
(195,096
)
 
(79,938
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from Senior Secured Credit Facilities
608,350

 
1,032,600

 

Repayments under Senior Secured Credit Facilities
(739,507
)
 
(579,755
)
 

Proceeds from Former Senior Secured Credit Facilities

 
134,500

 
466,700

Repayments under Former Senior Secured Credit Facilities

 
(1,011,285
)
 
(803,200
)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

 
500,625

 

Repayments under financing obligation
(49,770
)
 
(30,988
)
 

Proceeds from common stock options exercised
4,687

 
2,708

 
9,334

Repurchases of common stock
(22,345
)
 
(70,166
)
 

Debt issuance costs and debt discount

 
(16,198
)
 

Tax withholdings on share-based payment awards
(7,089
)
 
(1,723
)
 
(1,733
)
Other
(53
)
 
90

 
(9
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(205,727
)
 
(39,592
)
 
(328,908
)
Change in cash and cash equivalents
(875
)
 
21,059

 
(620
)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
185,093

 
164,034

 
164,654

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
$
184,218

 
$
185,093

 
$
164,034

 
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
 
 
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized
$
373,408

 
$
338,796

 
$
232,002

Cash payments (refunds) related to income taxes, net
$
3,796

 
$
12,469

 
$
(17,316
)
Increase (decrease) in construction-related deposits and liabilities
$
205

 
$
(1,723
)
 
$
(5,047
)
Non-cash issuance of common stock
$
30

 
$
686

 
$
763

Non-cash retirement of debt in connection with Spin-Off and Merger
$

 
$
(2,761,287
)
 
$

Non-cash settlement of accrued interest in connection with Spin-Off and Merger
$

 
$
(34,133
)
 
$

Non-cash recognition of financing obligation
$

 
$
3,194,287

 
$

Non-cash consideration for business combination
$

 
$
(659
)
 
$


See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

63

Table of Contents

PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1—Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization: Pinnacle Entertainment Inc. owns and operates 16 gaming, hospitality and entertainment businesses, of which 15 operate in leased facilities. Our owned facility is located in Ohio and our leased facilities are located in Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, and Pennsylvania. The leased facilities located outside of Pennsylvania are subject to the Master Lease (as defined below) and our leased facility located in Pennsylvania is subject to the Meadows Lease (as defined below). References in these footnotes to “Pinnacle,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” refer to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and its subsidiaries, except where stated or the context otherwise indicates. References to “ Former Pinnacle ” refer to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. prior to the Spin-Off and Merger (as such terms are defined below).

We view each of our operating businesses as an operating segment with the exception of our two businesses in Jackpot, Nevada, which we view as one operating segment. For financial reporting purposes, we aggregate our operating segments into the following reportable segments:
Midwest segment, which includes:
Location
Ameristar Council Bluffs
Council Bluffs, Iowa
Ameristar East Chicago
East Chicago, Indiana
Ameristar Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri
Ameristar St. Charles
St. Charles, Missouri
Belterra Resort
Florence, Indiana
Belterra Park
Cincinnati, Ohio
Meadows
Washington, Pennsylvania
River City
St. Louis, Missouri
 
 
South segment, which includes:
Location
Ameristar Vicksburg
Vicksburg, Mississippi
Boomtown Bossier City
Bossier City, Louisiana
Boomtown New Orleans
New Orleans, Louisiana
L’Auberge Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
L’Auberge Lake Charles
Lake Charles, Louisiana
 
 
West segment, which includes:
Location
Ameristar Black Hawk
Black Hawk, Colorado
Cactus Petes and Horseshu
Jackpot, Nevada

On December 17, 2017, Pinnacle entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “ Penn National Merger Agreement ”) with Penn National Gaming, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (“ Penn National ”), and Franchise Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Penn National (“ Franchise Merger Sub ”), providing for the merger of Franchise Merger Sub with and into Pinnacle (the “ Proposed Company Sale ”), with Pinnacle surviving the Proposed Company Sale as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Penn National .

At the effective time of the Proposed Company Sale , each share of Pinnacle common stock, par value $0.01 per share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than shares held by Penn National and other than dissenting shares) will be canceled and converted automatically into the right to receive (i) $20.00 in cash (plus, if the Proposed Company Sale is not consummated on or prior to October 31, 2018, $0.01 for each day during the period commencing on November 1, 2018 through the effective time of the Proposed Company Sale ) (the “Cash Consideration”) and (ii) 0.42 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Penn National (the “Penn National Common Stock”) (together with the Cash Consideration and cash required to be paid in lieu of fractional shares of Penn National Common Stock, the “ Proposed Company Sale Consideration ”).


64


In connection with the Proposed Company Sale , Penn National entered into (i) a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Membership Interest Purchase Agreement”) with Boyd Gaming Corporation (“ Boyd ”), to which Pinnacle will become a party immediately prior to the Proposed Company Sale , pursuant to which a subsidiary of Boyd will acquire the gaming and related operations of Ameristar St. Charles, Ameristar Kansas City, Belterra Resort and Belterra Park, in connection with the Proposed Company Sale ; and (ii) definitive agreements with a subsidiary of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (“GLPI”), a Pennsylvania corporation and real estate investment trust, to which Pinnacle will become a party immediately prior to the Proposed Company Sale , pursuant to which GLPI’s subsidiary will acquire the real estate associated with Belterra Park, from Pinnacle, and Plainridge Park Casino in Plainville, Massachusetts, from Penn National . At the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, GLPI and Boyd will enter into a master lease agreement for the gaming operations acquired by Boyd and Penn National will assume Pinnacle’s existing Master Lease and Meadows Lease and enter into certain amendments thereto.

Completion of the Proposed Company Sale is subject to certain conditions, many of which are beyond our control, including, among others: (1) receipt of the approval of stockholders of both Penn National and Pinnacle as required for the transaction, including the approval of the issuance of Penn National ’s common stock in connection with the Proposed Company Sale Consideration ; (2) the absence of any injunction, restraining order or other orders or laws prohibiting the consummation of the Proposed Company Sale ; (3) the expiration or termination of any waiting period applicable to the Proposed Company Sale under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Acts of 1976, as amended; (4) the receipt of all required regulatory approvals in a timely manner (including receipt of necessary approvals from gaming regulatory authorities); (5) the registration of the shares of Penn National to be issued to stockholders of Pinnacle; and (6) the listing of the shares of Penn National on The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC. The obligation of each party to consummate the Proposed Company Sale is also conditioned upon the accuracy of the other party’s representations and warranties, the absence of a material adverse effect involving the other party, and the other party having performed in all material respects its obligations under the Penn National Merger Agreement . Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the closing conditions, the Proposed Company Sale is expected to close in the second half of 2018.

If the Proposed Company Sale is not consummated on or before October 31, 2018, subject to certain limited extensions (including pursuant to Penn National’s election to extend under certain circumstances) provided in the Penn National Merger Agreement , either party may terminate the Penn National Merger Agreement . Consummation of the Proposed Company Sale is not subject to a financing condition.

On April 28, 2016, Former Pinnacle completed the transactions under the terms of a definitive agreement with GLPI (the “ GLPI Merger Agreement ”). Pursuant to the terms of the GLPI Merger Agreement , Former Pinnacle separated its operating assets and liabilities (and its Belterra Park property and excess land at certain locations) into the Company, a newly formed subsidiary initially named PNK Entertainment, Inc., and distributed to its stockholders, on a pro rata basis, all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company (such distribution referred to as the “Spin-Off”). As a result, Former Pinnacle stockholders received one share of the Company’s common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share, for each share of Former Pinnacle common stock that they owned. Gold Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of GLPI (“Merger Sub”), then merged with and into Former Pinnacle (the “ Merger ”), with Merger Sub surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of GLPI. Immediately following the Merger , the Company was renamed Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., and operates its gaming, hospitality and entertainment businesses in the facilities acquired by GLPI under a triple-net master lease agreement (the “Master Lease”). For more information regarding the Spin-Off and Merger, see Note 2, “Spin-Off, Merger and Master Lease.”

Former Pinnacle’s historical Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes thereto have been determined to represent the Company’s historical Consolidated Financial Statements based on the conclusion that, for accounting purposes, the Spin-Off should be evaluated as the reverse of its legal form under the requirements of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 505-60, Spinoffs and Reverse Spinoffs , which resulted in the Company being considered the accounting spinnor. In addition, the Master Lease of the facilities acquired by GLPI did not qualify for sale-leaseback accounting pursuant to ASC Topic 840, Leases (“ ASC 840 ”). Therefore, the Master Lease is accounted for as a financing obligation and the facilities remain on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

On September 9, 2016, we closed on a purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with GLP Capital, L.P. (“GLPC”), a subsidiary of GLPI, pursuant to which we acquired all of the equity interests of The Meadows Racetrack and Casino (“Meadows”) located in Washington, Pennsylvania. As a result of the transaction, we own and operate the Meadows’ gaming, entertainment and harness racing business subject to a triple-net lease of its underlying real estate with GLPI (the “Meadows Lease”). See Note 6, “Master Lease Financing Obligation and Lease Obligations” and Note 8, “Investment and Acquisition Activities.”


65


Basis of Presentation: The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The results for the periods reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, that management considers necessary for a fair presentation of operating results.

Principles of Consolidation: The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Investments in the common stock of unconsolidated affiliates in which we have the ability to exercise significant influence are accounted for under the equity method. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, (ii) the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements , and (iii) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates used by us include, among other things, the estimated useful lives for depreciable and amortizable assets, the estimated allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, estimated income tax provisions, the evaluation of the future realization of deferred tax assets, determining the adequacy of reserves for self-insured liabilities and our guest loyalty programs, the initial measurement of the financing obligation associated with the Master Lease, estimated cash flows in assessing the recoverability of long-lived assets, asset impairments, goodwill and other intangible assets, contingencies and litigation, and estimates of the forfeiture rate and expected life of share-based payment awards and stock price volatility when computing share-based compensation expense. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

Fair Value: Fair value measurements affect our accounting and impairment assessments of our long-lived assets, investments in unconsolidated affiliates, assets acquired in an acquisition, goodwill, and other intangible assets. Fair value measurements also affect our accounting for certain financial assets and liabilities. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and is measured according to a hierarchy that includes: “Level 1” inputs, such as quoted prices in an active market for identical assets or liabilities; “Level 2” inputs, which are observable inputs for similar assets; or “Level 3” inputs, which are unobservable inputs.

The following table presents a summary of fair value measurements by level for certain financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for which it is practicable to estimate fair value:
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using:
 
Total Carrying Amount
 
Total Fair Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
As of December 31, 2017:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Held-to-maturity securities
$
10.4

 
$
10.4

 
$

 
$
7.5

 
$
2.9

Promissory notes
$
16.9

 
$
17.2

 
$

 
$
17.2

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term debt
$
812.3

 
$
854.2

 
$

 
$
854.2

 
$

Other long-term liabilities
$
5.0

 
$
5.0

 
$

 
$
5.0

 
$

As of December 31, 2016:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Held-to-maturity securities
$
14.3

 
$
16.4

 
$

 
$
13.4

 
$
3.0

Promissory notes
$
15.6

 
$
19.8

 
$

 
$
19.8

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term debt
$
936.7

 
$
953.2

 
$

 
$
953.2

 
$

Other long-term liabilities
$
5.5

 
$
5.6

 
$

 
$
5.6

 
$


The estimated fair values for certain of our long-term held-to-maturity securities and our long-term promissory notes were based on Level 2 inputs using observable market data for comparable instruments in establishing prices. The estimated fair values of certain of our other long-term liabilities were based on Level 2 inputs using a present value of future cash flow valuation technique, which is based on contractually obligated payments and terms.

66



The estimated fair values for certain of our long-term held-to-maturity securities were based on Level 3 inputs using a present value of future cash flow valuation technique that relies on management assumptions and qualitative observations. Key significant unobservable inputs in this technique include discount rate risk premiums and probability-weighted cash flow scenarios.

The estimated fair values of our long-term debt were based on Level 2 inputs of observable market data on comparable debt instruments on or about December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . See Note 4, “Long-Term Debt.”

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase, are stated at the lower of cost or market value, and are valued using Level 1 inputs. Book overdraft balances are included in “Accounts payable” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable consists primarily of casino, hotel and other receivables. We extend casino credit to approved customers in states where it is permitted following investigations of creditworthiness. Accounts receivable are non-interest bearing and are initially recorded at cost. We have estimated an allowance for doubtful accounts of $6.2 million and $5.3 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , respectively, to reduce receivables to their carrying amount, which approximates fair value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based upon, among other things, collection experience, customer credit evaluations and the age of the receivables. Bad debt expense totaled $2.5 million , $0.1 million and $6.1 million , for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. The recovery of certain casino accounts receivable in 2016, which were fully reserved as of December 31, 2015, reduced our bad debt expense for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Inventories: Inventories, which consist primarily of food, beverage and retail items, are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Costs are determined using the first-in, first-out and the weighted average methods.

Land, Buildings, Vessels and Equipment: Land, buildings, vessels and equipment are stated at cost.
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Depreciation expense
$
208.3

 
$
206.5

 
$
226.8

We capitalize the costs of improvements that extend the life of the asset. We expense repair and maintenance costs as incurred. Gains or losses on the disposition of land, buildings, vessels and equipment are included in the determination of income. We depreciate our land improvements; buildings and improvements; vessels; and furniture, fixtures and equipment using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the related lease term, as follows:
 
Years
Land improvements
5 to 20
Buildings and improvements
10 to 35
Vessels
10 to 35
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
3 to 20

We review the carrying amounts of our land, buildings, vessels and equipment used in our operations whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable from estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying amount, no impairment is indicated. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying amount, then an impairment charge is recorded based on the fair value of the asset.

Development costs directly associated with the acquisition, development and construction of a project are capitalized as a cost of the project during the periods in which activities necessary to get the property ready for its intended use are in progress. The costs incurred for development projects are carried at cost. Interest costs associated with development projects are capitalized as part of the cost of the constructed asset. When no debt is incurred specifically for a project, interest is capitalized on amounts expended for the project using our weighted-average cost of borrowing. Capitalization of interest ceases when the project, or discernible portions of the project, is substantially complete. If substantially all of the construction activities of a

67


project are suspended, capitalization of interest will cease until such activities are resumed. For further discussion, see Note 4, “Long-Term Debt.”

As a result of the Spin-Off and Merger, substantially all of the land, buildings, vessels and associated improvements used in the Company’s operations and included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets are subject to the Master Lease and owned by GLPI. See Note 2, “Spin-Off, Merger and Master Lease.”

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: Goodwill consists of the excess of the acquisition cost over the fair value of the net assets acquired in business combinations and has been allocated to our reporting units. We consider each of our operating segments to represent a reporting unit. Indefinite-lived intangible assets include gaming licenses, a racing license and trade names for which it is reasonably assured that we will continue to renew indefinitely. Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are subject to an annual assessment for impairment during the fourth quarter (October 1st test date), or more frequently if there are indications of possible impairment. In determining the carrying amount of our reporting units, we allocate each reporting unit that is subject to the Master Lease a pro-rata portion of the Master Lease financing obligation. Amortizing intangible assets include player relationships and favorable leasehold interests. We review amortizing intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. See Note 9, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”

Debt Issuance Costs and Debt Discounts/Premiums: Debt issuance costs and debt discounts/premiums incurred in connection with the issuance of debt have been included as a component of the carrying amount of debt, with the exception of revolving credit facility debt issuance costs, which are included in “Other assets, net” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Debt issuance costs and debt discounts/premiums are amortized over the contractual term of the debt to interest expense. Debt issuance costs of the revolving credit facility are amortized on a straight-line basis, while all other debt issuance costs and debt discounts/premiums are amortized using the effective interest method. Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discounts/premiums included in interest expense was $7.8 million , $7.3 million  and $12.4 million , for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively.

Self-Insurance Accruals: We are self-insured up to certain limits for costs associated with general liability, workers’ compensation and employee health coverage. Insurance claims and reserves include accruals of estimated settlements for known claims, legal costs related to settling such claims and accruals of actuarial estimates of incurred but not reported claims. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , we had total self-insurance accruals of $23.3 million and $26.1 million , respectively, which are included in “Total current liabilities” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In estimating these accruals, we consider historical loss experience and make judgments about the expected level of costs per claim. We believe the estimates of future liability are reasonable based upon our methodology; however, changes in health care costs, accident frequency and severity could materially affect the estimate for these liabilities.

Guest Loyalty Programs: We offer incentives to our guests through our my choice guest loyalty program (“ my choice program ”). Under the my choice program , guests earn points based on their level of play that may be redeemed for various benefits, such as cash back, dining, or hotel stays, among others. The reward credit balance under the my choice program will be forfeited if the guest does not earn any reward credits over the prior six-month period. In addition, based on their level of play, guests can earn additional benefits without redeeming points, such as a car lease, among other items. In January 2018, the Company implemented the my choice program at Meadows, which previously operated its own guest loyalty program.

We accrue a liability for the estimated cost of providing these benefits as the benefits are earned. Estimates and assumptions are made regarding cost of providing the benefits, breakage rates, and the combination of goods and services guests will choose. We use historical data to assist in the determination of estimated accruals. Changes in estimates or guest redemption patterns could produce different results. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , we had accrued $21.0 million and $25.1 million , respectively, for the estimated cost of providing these benefits, which are included in “Other accrued liabilities” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As described below in “Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements,” the accounting related to our guest loyalty programs was impacted by the adoption of ASC 606 (as defined below) during the first quarter 2018.

Income Taxes: Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that included the enactment date. Valuation allowances are provided against deferred tax assets when it is deemed more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized within a reasonable time period. We assess tax positions using a two-step process. A tax position is recognized if it meets a “more likely

68


than not” threshold, and is measured at the largest amount of benefit that has greater than a 50% chance of being realized. Uncertain tax positions are reviewed each balance sheet date. Liabilities recorded as a result of this analysis are classified as current or long-term based on the timing of expected payment. See Note 5, “Income Taxes.”

Revenue Recognition: Gaming revenues consist of the net win from gaming activities, which is the difference between amounts wagered and amounts paid to winning patrons. Cash discounts and other cash incentives to customers related to gaming play are recorded as a reduction to gaming revenue. Food and beverage; lodging; and retail, entertainment, and other; operating revenues are recognized as products are delivered or services are performed. Advance deposits on lodging are recorded as accrued liabilities until services are provided to the customer. As described below in “Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements,” the accounting related to our revenues, including complimentary revenues, was impacted by the adoption of ASC 606 during the first quarter 2018.

The retail value of food and beverage, lodging and other services furnished to guests on a complimentary basis is excluded from revenues as promotional allowances in calculating total revenues. The estimated costs of providing such promotional allowances are included in gaming expenses. Complimentary revenues that have been excluded from the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , were as follows:
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Food and beverage
$
141.6

 
$
138.7

 
$
137.9

Lodging
63.1

 
64.5

 
63.1

Retail, entertainment and other
16.1

 
16.4

 
18.0

Total promotional allowances
$
220.8

 
$
219.6

 
$
219.0


The estimated costs of providing complimentary food and beverage, lodging and other services, for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , were as follows:
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Promotional allowance costs included in gaming expense
$
163.4

 
$
160.3

 
$
167.6


Gaming Taxes: We are subject to taxes based on gross gaming revenues in the jurisdictions in which we operate, subject to applicable jurisdictional adjustments. These gaming taxes are an assessment on our gaming revenues and are recorded as a gaming expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. These taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , were as follows:
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Gaming taxes
$
697.0

 
$
616.3

 
$
580.3


Leases: The Company has certain long-term lease obligations, including the Meadows Lease, ground leases at certain properties, office space, and equipment. Rent associated with operating leases, excluding contingent rent, is expensed on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease beginning on the date of possession of the leased property. To the extent it is considered probable, contingent rent associated with operating leases is expensed as incurred. At lease inception, the lease term is determined by assuming the exercise of those renewal options that are reasonably assured. The lease term is used to determine whether a lease is capital or operating and is used to calculate the straight-line rent expense. Additionally, the depreciable life of capital lease assets and leasehold improvements is limited by the expected lease term if less than the useful life of the asset. Rent expenses are included in “General and administrative” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.


69


Advertising Costs: We expense advertising costs the first time the advertising takes place. These costs are included in gaming expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, advertising costs associated with development projects are included in pre-opening, development and other costs until the project is completed. These costs for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , were as follows:
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Advertising costs
$
28.1

 
$
33.0

 
$
38.4


Pre-opening, Development and Other Costs: Pre-opening, development and other costs consist of payroll costs to hire, employ and train the workforce prior to opening an operating facility; marketing campaigns prior to and in connection with the opening; legal and professional fees related to the project but not otherwise attributable to depreciable assets; and lease payments, real estate taxes, and other general and administrative costs prior to the opening of an operating facility. In addition, pre-opening, development and other costs include acquisition and restructuring costs. Pre-opening, development and other costs are expensed as incurred. Pre-opening, development and other costs for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , consisted of the following:
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Proposed Company Sale costs (1)
$
6.9

 
$

 
$

Spin-Off and Merger costs (2)
0.9

 
48.7

 
12.2

Meadows acquisition costs (3)
0.2

 
6.4

 

Other
1.5

 
0.9

 
2.0

Total pre-opening, development and other costs
$
9.5

 
$
56.0

 
$
14.2

(1)
Amount comprised principally of legal, advisory, and other costs associated with the Proposed Company Sale.
(2)
Amounts comprised principally of legal, advisory, and other costs. See Note 2, “Spin-Off, Merger and Master Lease.”
(3)
Amounts comprised principally of legal, advisory, and other costs. See Note 8, “Investment and Acquisition Activities.”

Share-based Compensation: We measure the cost of awards of equity instruments to employees based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The grant-date fair value is determined by using either the Black-Scholes option-pricing model or performing a Monte Carlo simulation. The fair value, net of expected forfeitures, is amortized as compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Expected forfeitures are estimated at the time of each grant using historical information. See Note 7, “Employee Benefit Plans.”

Earnings Per Share: The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) is based on net income (loss) attributable to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. divided by the basic weighted average number of common shares and diluted weighted average number of common shares, respectively. Diluted EPS reflects the addition of potentially dilutive securities, such as stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock and performance stock units (“ share-based payment awards ”). We calculate the dilutive effect of share-based payment awards using the treasury stock method. A total of 0.0 million , 1.3 million and 0.3 million share-based payment awards were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively, because including them would have been anti-dilutive.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded a net loss from continuing operations. Accordingly, the potential dilution from share-based payment awards was anti-dilutive, which resulted in basic EPS equaling diluted EPS for such year. Share-based payment awards that could potentially dilute basic EPS in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS for the year ended December 31, 2016 was 3.0 million .

Treasury Stock: In May 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $50.0 million of our common stock, which we completed in July 2016. In August 2016, our Board of Directors authorized an additional share repurchase program of up to $50.0 million of our common stock. The cost of the shares acquired is treated as a reduction to stockholders’ equity. During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we repurchased 1.1 million shares of common stock for $22.3 million and 6.2 million shares of common stock for $70.2 million , respectively. In December 2017, the Company canceled the additional share repurchase program and at that time, we had repurchased 2.8 million shares of common stock for $42.4 million .


70


Business Combinations: We allocate the business combination purchase price to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values. The excess of the purchase price over those fair values is recorded as goodwill. We determined the fair value of identifiable intangible assets, such as player relationships and trade names, as well as any other significant tangible assets or liabilities, such as long-lived property. The fair value allocation methodology requires management to make assumptions and apply judgment to estimate the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities assumed. Management estimates the fair value of assets and liabilities primarily using discounted cash flows and replacement cost analysis. Provisional fair value measurements of acquired assets and liabilities assumed may be retrospectively adjusted during the measurement period. The measurement period ends once we are able to determine we have obtained all necessary information that existed as of the acquisition date or once we determine that such information is unavailable. The measurement period does not extend beyond one year from the acquisition date. See Note 8, “Investment and Acquisition Activities.”

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements: In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which introduced a new standard related to revenue recognition, ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606” or the “new revenue standard”). Under ASC 606, recognition of revenue occurs when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the new revenue standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. ASC 606 was to be adopted using either a full retrospective approach for all periods presented in the period of adoption or a modified retrospective approach. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers - Deferral of the Effective Date , which deferred the implementation of ASC 606 to be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Principal versus Agent Considerations , which clarified the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations in the new revenue standard pursuant to ASU No. 2014-09. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing , and in May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, which amended certain aspects of the new revenue standard pursuant to ASU No. 2014-09. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-19 and ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements , which further clarified and corrected certain elements of ASC 606.

The Company had previously disclosed that it expected to adopt ASC 606 using the full retrospective approach. However, during the fourth quarter 2017, due to changes in facts and circumstances, particularly the Proposed Company Sale to Penn National, we changed our transition method to the modified retrospective approach. Unlike the full retrospective approach, the modified retrospective approach does not require the Company to recast the prior period consolidated financial statements. Instead, the modified retrospective approach requires the Company to provide disclosures in the notes that accompany the consolidated financial statements describing the financial statement line items impacted by the new revenue standard. We adopted ASC 606 during the first quarter 2018 using the modified retrospective approach to all contracts as of the date of initial application, which was January 1, 2018.

The Company has concluded that the adoption of the new revenue standard principally affects (1) how we measure the liability associated with our my choice program and (2) the classification and, as it relates to lodging, the measurement, of revenues and expenses between gaming; food and beverage; lodging; and retail, entertainment and other.

Under our my choice program, guests earn points based on their level of play, which may be redeemed for various benefits, such as cash back, dining, or hotel stays, among others. Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, we determined our liability for unredeemed points based on the estimated costs of services or merchandise to be provided and estimated redemption rates. Upon adoption of ASC 606, points awarded under our my choice program are considered a material right given to players based on their gaming play and the promise to provide points to players is required to be accounted for as a separate performance obligation. In addition, certain tier benefits associated with our my choice program, represent material rights in a manner similar to player points, which results in such benefits constituting separate performance obligations. Therefore, ASC 606 requires us to allocate the revenues associated with the players’ activity between gaming revenue and the value of the points and certain tier benefits, if applicable. The measurement of the liability is based on the estimated standalone selling price of the points earned after factoring in the likelihood of redemption. The revenue associated with the points earned will be recognized in the period in which they are redeemed.

In addition to the above, prior to the adoption of ASC 606, complimentary revenues pertaining to food and beverage; lodging; and retail, entertainment and other; were excluded from the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the estimated costs of providing such complimentary goods and services were included as gaming expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. However, subsequent to the adoption of ASC 606, food and beverage, lodging and other services furnished to our guests on a complimentary basis will be measured at the estimated standalone selling prices and included as revenues within

71


food and beverage; lodging; and retail, entertainment and other; as appropriate, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, which will result in a corresponding decrease in gaming revenues. Furthermore, specifically as it relates to lodging, the transition from complimentary retail value to estimated standalone selling price will increase the recorded amount of lodging complimentary revenue. Additionally, subsequent to the adoption of ASC 606, the costs of providing such complimentary goods and services will be included as expenses within food and beverage; lodging; and retail, entertainment and other; as appropriate, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, which will result in a decrease in gaming expenses.

The amounts relating to promotional allowances and estimated costs of providing complimentary goods and services for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, are presented tabularly in “Revenue Recognition” above. Lastly, we expect that the cumulative effect adjustment to our accumulated deficit upon adoption of ASC 606 will not be significant. Adoption of the new revenue standard will also result in additional revenue-related disclosures in the footnotes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities , which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter 2018 and it did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Recognition and Measurement of Leases . Under the new guidance, for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases), at the commencement date, lessees will be required to recognize a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis, and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Further, the new lease guidance simplifies the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and liabilities, which no longer provides a source for off balance sheet financing. The effective date for this update is for the annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. Lessees and lessors must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements.

The Company currently anticipates adopting this accounting standard during the first quarter 2019. Operating leases, including the Meadows Lease, our ground leases at certain properties, and agreements relating to slot machines, will be recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as a right-of-use asset with a corresponding lease liability, which will represent the present value of the lease payments to be made over the lease term. Additionally, as a result of this ASU, the Company will be required to reassess whether the Spin-Off and Merger transactions qualified for sale-leaseback accounting treatment. The full qualitative and quantitative effects of these changes have not yet been determined and are still being analyzed.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-06, Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments , which clarified the requirements for assessing whether contingent call or put options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter 2017 and it did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting , which, among other things, eliminated the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter 2017 and it did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting , which simplified several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter 2017 and it did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. In adopting this guidance, the Company made an accounting policy election to continue to estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest as opposed to accounting for forfeitures as they occur. Prior periods were not required to be adjusted as a result of the adoption of this guidance.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Accounting for Credit Losses , which amends the guidance on the impairment of financial instruments. This update adds an impairment model (known as the current expected credit losses model) that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes, as an

72


allowance, its estimate of expected credit losses. The effective date for this update is for the annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new guidance on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments , which amended the current accounting standard to add or clarify guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows in order to reduce the diversity in practice of certain types of cash flows where consistent principles previously did not exist. Further, in November 2016, the FASB issued No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash , which amended the existing accounting standard to require the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in total cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents, which was intended to reduce the diversity in practice caused by the lack of specificity in the existing accounting standard regarding the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter 2018 using a retrospective transition approach and it did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business , which amended the guidance of the definition of a business, which affected many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill and consolidation. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter 2018 using a prospective transition approach and it did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-03, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323) , which adds and amends the SEC paragraphs pursuant to staff announcements at the September 22, 2016 and November 17, 2016 Emerging Issues Task Force meetings. Principally, this ASU is responsive to the requirement to disclose the impact that recently issued accounting standards will have on the financial statements of a registrant when such standards are adopted in a future period. This guidance, which was effective immediately, did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment , which simplified the complexity and cost of performing interim and annual assessments for impairment of goodwill by eliminating the requirement to perform Step 2 of the impairment test. Thereby, companies were no longer required to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Instead, a company should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. A company should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit and after consideration of income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit, if applicable. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter 2017 using a prospective transition approach.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Scope of Modification Accounting , which provided clarity and intended to reduce both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation . More specifically, ASU No. 2017-09 provided guidance on which changes to the terms and conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter 2018 using a prospective transition approach and it did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Leases (Topic 840), and Leases (Topic 842) , which makes amendments to the SEC paragraphs pursuant to the staff announcement at the July 20, 2017 Emerging Issues Task Force meeting and rescinds prior SEC staff announcements and observer comments. To the extent this guidance is applicable, it is effective immediately. As discussed above, as of December 31, 2017, the Company had not yet adopted ASC Topics 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers , and 842, Leases ; however, ASC 606 was adopted by the Company during the first quarter 2018. The guidance applicable to the Company in this ASU did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

A variety of proposed or otherwise potential accounting standards are currently under review and study by standard-setting organizations and certain regulatory agencies. Given the tentative and preliminary nature of such proposed standards, we have not yet determined the effect, if any, that the implementation of any such proposed or revised standards would have on our Consolidated Financial Statements .


73


Note 2—Spin-Off, Merger and Master Lease

Overview of the Spin-Off and Merger: On April 28, 2016, Former Pinnacle completed the transactions under the terms of the GLPI Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the GLPI Merger Agreement, Former Pinnacle separated its operating assets and liabilities (and its Belterra Park property and excess land at certain locations) into the Company, a newly formed subsidiary, and distributed to its stockholders, on a pro rata basis, all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company. As a result, Former Pinnacle stockholders received one share of the Company’s common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share, for each share of Former Pinnacle common stock that they owned. Merger Sub then merged with and into Former Pinnacle , with Merger Sub surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of GLPI. Following the Merger, the Company operates its gaming, hospitality and entertainment businesses in the facilities acquired by GLPI under the Master Lease.

In completing the Merger, each share of common stock, par value $0.10 per share, of Former Pinnacle (the “Former Pinnacle Common Stock”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than shares of Former Pinnacle Common Stock (i) owned or held in treasury by Former Pinnacle or (ii) owned by GLPI, its subsidiaries or Merger Sub) was canceled and converted into the right to receive 0.85 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of GLPI.

In connection with the Spin-Off and Merger, on April 28, 2016, we made a dividend to Former Pinnacle of $808.4 million (the “Cash Payment”), which was equal to the amount of debt outstanding as of April 28, 2016, less $2.7 billion that GLPI assumed pursuant to the GLPI Merger Agreement. Immediately following the consummation of the Spin-Off and Merger, Former Pinnacle ’s amended and restated credit agreement (“ Former Senior Secured Credit Facilities ”) was repaid in full and terminated and Former Pinnacle ’s 6.375% senior notes due 2021 (“ 6.375% Notes”), 7.50% senior notes due 2021 (“ 7.50% Notes”) and 7.75% senior subordinated notes due 2022 (“ 7.75% Notes”) were redeemed. In addition, Former Pinnacle ’s 8.75% senior subordinated notes due 2020 (“ 8.75% Notes”) were redeemed on May 15, 2016. Following the consummation of the Spin-Off and Merger, the Company had no outstanding obligations under the Former Senior Secured Credit Facilities , the 6.375% Notes, the 7.50% Notes, the 7.75% Notes and the 8.75% Notes. For a description of the Company’s existing long-term debt, see Note 4, “Long-Term Debt.”

Master Lease: Fourteen of our sixteen gaming facilities are subject to the Master Lease with GLPI. The Master Lease has an initial term of 10 years with five subsequent, five -year renewal periods at our option. The rent, which is payable in monthly installments, is comprised of base rent, which includes a land and a building component, and percentage rent. The land base rent is fixed for the entire lease term. The building base rent is subject to an annual escalation of up to 2% , depending on the Adjusted Revenue to Rent Ratio (as defined in the Master Lease) of 1.8 :1. The percentage rent, which is fixed for the first two years , will be adjusted every two years to establish a new fixed amount for the next two -year period. Each new fixed amount will be calculated by multiplying 4% by the difference between (i) the average net revenues for the trailing two -year period and (ii) $1.1 billion . In May 2017, the building base rent was adjusted by the annual escalation.

As of December 31, 2017, annual rent under the Master Lease was $382.8 million , which was comprised of the land base rent, the building base rent and the percentage rent, which were $44.1 million , $294.6 million and $44.1 million , respectively.

Failed Spin-Off-Leaseback: The Spin-Off and the subsequent leaseback of the gaming facilities under the terms of the Master Lease did not meet all of the requirements for sale-leaseback accounting treatment under ASC 840 ; and consequently, is accounted for as a financing obligation. Specifically, the Master Lease contains certain provisions that constitute prohibited forms of continuing involvement in the leased assets; such as, among other provisions, the Master Lease requires us to facilitate and cooperate in transferring ownership of the businesses to a successor tenant in the event that the Master Lease is not renewed or is otherwise terminated.

For further information on the accounting of the Master Lease and payments made under the Master Lease, see Note 6, “Master Lease Financing Obligation and Lease Obligations.”


74


Note 3—Land, Buildings, Vessels and Equipment

The following table presents a summary of our land, buildings, vessels and equipment:
 
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Land, buildings, vessels and equipment:
 
 
 
       Land and land improvements
$
431.6

 
$
426.7

       Buildings, vessels and improvements
2,700.3

 
2,689.0

       Furniture, fixtures and equipment
805.0

 
805.9

       Construction in progress
28.6

 
32.7

Land, buildings, vessels and equipment, gross
3,965.5

 
3,954.3

       Less: accumulated depreciation
(1,336.5
)
 
(1,185.8
)
Land, buildings, vessels and equipment, net
$
2,629.0

 
$
2,768.5


As a result of the Spin-Off and Merger, substantially all of the land, buildings, vessels and associated improvements used in the Company’s operations and included in the table above are subject to the Master Lease and owned by GLPI. See Note 2, “Spin-Off, Merger and Master Lease.”

75


Note 4—Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
 
December 31, 2017
 
Outstanding Principal
 
Unamortized Discount, Net of Premium, and Debt Issuance Costs
 
Long-Term Debt, Net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Senior Secured Credit Facilities:
 
 
 
 
 
    Revolving Credit Facility due 2021
$
169.2

 
$

 
$
169.2

    Term Loan A Facility due 2021
152.4

 
(2.2
)
 
150.2

5.625% Notes due 2024
500.0

 
(7.2
)
 
492.8

Other
0.1

 

 
0.1

Total debt including current maturities
821.7

 
(9.4
)
 
812.3

Less: current maturities
0.0

 

 
0.0

Total long-term debt
$
821.7

 
$
(9.4
)
 
$
812.3


 
December 31, 2016
 
Outstanding Principal
 
Unamortized Discount, Net of Premium, and Debt Issuance Costs
 
Long-Term Debt, Net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Senior Secured Credit Facilities:
 
 
 
 
 
    Revolving Credit Facility due 2021
$
107.2

 
$

 
$
107.2

    Term Loan A Facility due 2021
180.4

 
(3.2
)
 
177.2

    Term Loan B Facility due 2023
165.2

 
(4.9
)
 
160.3

5.625% Notes due 2024
500.0

 
(8.1
)
 
491.9

Other
0.1

 

 
0.1

Total debt including current maturities
952.9

 
(16.2
)
 
936.7

Less: current maturities
(12.3
)
 

 
(12.3
)
Total long-term debt
$
940.6

 
$
(16.2
)
 
$
924.4


Senior Secured Credit Facilities: On April 28, 2016, in connection with the Spin-Off and Merger, the Company entered into a credit agreement with certain lenders (the “ Credit Agreement ”). The Credit Agreement is comprised of (i) a $185.0 million term loan A facility with a maturity of five years (the “ Term Loan A Facility ”), (ii) a $300.0 million term loan B facility with a maturity of seven years (the “ Term Loan B Facility ”) and (iii) a $400.0 million revolving credit facility with a maturity of five years (the “ Revolving Credit Facility ” and together with the Term Loan A Facility and the Term Loan B Facility , the “ Senior Secured Credit Facilities ”). As of December 31, 2017 , we had $169.2 million drawn under the Revolving Credit Facility and had $9.2 million committed under various letters of credit.

Loans under the Term Loan A Facility and Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, LIBOR plus an applicable margin from 1.50% to 2.50% or the base rate plus an applicable margin from 0.50% to 1.50% , in each case, depending on the Consolidated Total Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) as of the most recent fiscal quarter. Loans under the Term Loan B Facility bore interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, LIBOR plus 3.00% or the base rate plus 2.00% and in no event was LIBOR to be less than 0.75% . In addition, we pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility at a rate that ranges from 0.30% to 0.50% per annum, depending on the Consolidated Total Net Leverage Ratio as of the most recent fiscal quarter.


76


The Term Loan A Facility amortizes in equal quarterly amounts equal to a percentage of the original outstanding principal amount at closing as follows: (i) 5% per annum in the first two years, (ii) 7.5% per annum in the third year and (iii) 10% per annum in the fourth and fifth year. The remaining principal amount is payable on April 28, 2021. The voluntary repayments we made during the year ended December 31, 2017 have satisfied the quarterly amortization payments that were otherwise due during the year ending December 31, 2018. The Term Loan B Facility amortized in equal quarterly amounts equal to 1% per annum of the original outstanding principal amount at closing. The Revolving Credit Facility is not subject to amortization and is due and payable on April 28, 2021.

The Credit Agreement contains, among other things, certain affirmative and negative covenants and, solely for the benefit of the lenders under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities , financial covenants, including (1) maximum permitted Consolidated Total Net Leverage Ratio of 3.75 to 1.00 as of December 31, 2017 ; (2) maximum permitted Consolidated Senior Secured Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of 2.50 to 1.00 as of December 31, 2017 ; and (3) required minimum Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of 2.50 to 1.00. The Credit Agreement also contains certain customary events of default, including the occurrence of a change of control, revocation of material licenses by gaming authorities (subject to a cure period), termination of the Master Lease and cross-default to certain events of default under the Master Lease. As of December 31, 2017 , we were in compliance with each of these ratios, and compliance with these ratios does not have a material impact on our financial flexibility, including our ability to incur new indebtedness.

5.625% Notes: On April 28, 2016, we issued $375.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.625% senior notes due 2024 (the “Existing 5.625% Notes”). The Existing 5.625% Notes were issued at par, mature on May 1, 2024, and bear interest at the rate of 5.625% per annum. Interest on the Existing 5.625% Notes is payable semi-annually on May 1st and November 1st of each year.

On April 28, 2016, the proceeds of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities , together with the proceeds from the Existing 5.625% Notes were used (i) to make the Cash Payment and (ii) to pay fees and expenses related to the issuance of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the Existing 5.625% Notes.

On October 12, 2016, we issued an additional $125.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.625% senior notes due 2024 (the “Additional 5.625% Notes” and together with the Existing 5.625% Notes, the “ 5.625% Notes”), under the bond indenture governing the Existing 5.625% Notes issued on April 28, 2016, as amended and supplemented by that certain first supplemental indenture, dated as of October 12, 2016. The Additional 5.625% Notes were issued at par plus a premium of 50 basis points. We financed the purchase of the Meadows with our Revolving Credit Facility and the net proceeds from the issuance of the Additional 5.625% Notes were used to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility.

The 5.625% Notes become callable at a premium over their face amount on May 1, 2019. Beginning on or after May 1, 2019, 2020 and 2021, and until the next applicable redemption date, the 5.625% Notes are redeemable at a percentage of par equal to 104.219% , 102.813% and 101.406% , respectively. Prior to maturity, on or after May 1, 2022, the 5.625% Notes are redeemable at par. The 5.625% Notes are redeemable prior to such times at a price that reflects a yield to the first call that is equivalent to the applicable Treasury bond yield plus 0.5 percentage points.
The bond indenture governing our 5.625% Notes and our Senior Secured Credit Facilities limit the amount of dividends we are permitted to pay.

Loss on early extinguishment of debt: During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we recorded losses of $0.5 million and $5.2 million , respectively, related to the repayments, in full, of the Term Loan B Facility and the Former Senior Secured Credit Facilities, respectively. The losses included the write-off of previously unamortized debt issuance costs and original issuance discount.

77


Interest expense, net, was as follows:
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Interest expense from financing obligation (1)
$
331.1

 
$
225.1

 
$

Interest expense from debt (2)
50.3

 
108.0

 
244.7

Interest income
(0.4
)
 
(0.4
)
 
(0.3
)
Capitalized interest
(0.1
)
 
(0.1
)
 

Other (3)

 
1.7

 

Interest expense, net
$
380.9

 
$
334.3

 
$
244.4

(1)
See Note 6, “Master Lease Financing Obligation and Lease Obligations,” for information on total lease payments under the Master Lease.
(2)
Interest expense associated with the Former Senior Secured Credit Facilities, the 6.375% Notes, the 7.50% Notes, the 7.75% Notes, and the 8.75% Notes, which were no longer obligations of the Company as of April 28, 2016, included in the year ended December 31, 2016 was $76.5 million .
(3)
Represents a nonrecurring expense associated with the Spin-Off and Merger.
     
Scheduled maturities of long-term debt: As of December 31, 2017 , annual maturities of our long-term debt were as follows (amounts in millions):
Year ended December 31:
 
2018
$
0.0

2019
9.1

2020
18.5

2021
294.1

2022
0.0

Thereafter
500.0

Total
821.7

Less: unamortized debt discount, net of premium, and debt issuance costs
(9.4
)
Long-term debt, including current portion
$
812.3



78


Note 5—Income Taxes

New tax legislation, commonly referred to as The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), was enacted on December 22, 2017. The Tax Act significantly revised U.S. corporate income tax law to, among other things, reduce the federal corporate income tax rate, impose a new minimum tax on global intangible low-taxed income and implement a modified territorial tax system that included a one-time transition tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. The global intangible low-taxed income and the one-time transition tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries did not significantly impact the Company upon enactment.

ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), requires companies to recognize the effect of tax law changes in the period of enactment even though the effective date for most provisions is for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, or in the case of certain other provisions, January 1, 2018. Given the significance of the Tax Act, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which allows registrants to record provisional amounts during a one-year “measurement period” similar to that used when accounting for business combinations. However, the measurement period is deemed to have ended earlier when the registrant has obtained, prepared and analyzed the information necessary to finalize its accounting. During the measurement period, impacts of the law are expected to be recorded at the time a reasonable estimate for all or a portion of the effects can be made, and provisional amounts can be recognized and adjusted as information becomes available, prepared or analyzed.

To the extent a reasonable estimate could be made, we have accounted for the impact of the Tax Act for the year ended December 31, 2017 . We will continue to refine our estimates throughout the measurement period or until the accounting is complete, and the impact of the Tax Act may differ from these estimates, possibly materially, due to, among other things, changes in estimates and assumptions we have made. As noted above, the Tax Act permanently reduced the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% , effective January 1, 2018, which required, in part, a revaluation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2017 . The Tax Act also granted indefinite carry-forward of net operating losses generated on or after January 1, 2018. As a result of the revaluation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, the change in the net operating loss carry-forward rules, and other provisions of the Tax Act, during the year ended December 31, 2017 , we recorded a one-time tax benefit of $21.5 million .

The Spin-Off described in Note 2, “Spin-Off, Merger and Master Lease,” was a taxable transaction whereby a gain was recognized for tax purposes and the tax bases of the operating assets were stepped up to fair market value at the time of the transaction. Pursuant to ASC 740, the tax impact directly related to the transaction amongst stockholders was recorded to equity, consistent with the overall accounting treatment of the transaction. All changes in tax bases of assets and liabilities caused by the transactions were recorded to additional paid-in capital. Furthermore, as previously noted, the gaming facilities leased from GLPI are presented on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation, and the Master Lease is accounted for as a financing obligation. However, for federal and state income tax purposes, the Master Lease is considered an operating lease. As such, the Company does not recognize any tax bases in the leased gaming facilities, which creates basis differences that give rise to deferred income taxes.
The composition of our income tax benefit (expense) from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , was as follows:
 
Current
 
Deferred
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Year ended December 31, 2017:
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Federal
$
1.7

 
$
17.3

 
$
19.0

State
(1.8
)
 
(2.6
)
 
(4.4
)
 
$
(0.1
)
 
$
14.7

 
$
14.6

Year ended December 31, 2016:
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Federal
$
(1.6
)
 
$
43.4

 
$
41.8

State
(4.4
)
 
(9.4
)
 
(13.8
)
 
$
(6.0
)
 
$
34.0

 
$
28.0

Year ended December 31, 2015:
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Federal
$
5.3

 
$
(10.3
)
 
$
(5.0
)
State
(1.9
)
 
(7.7
)
 
(9.6
)
 
$
3.4

 
$
(18.0
)
 
$
(14.6
)

79


The following table reconciles our effective income tax rate from continuing operations to the federal statutory tax rate:
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
Percent
 
Amount
 
Percent
 
Amount
 
Percent
 
Amount
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions, except tax rates)
Federal income tax benefit (expense) at the statutory rate
35.0
 %
 
$
(16.5
)
 
35.0
 %
 
$
170.1

 
35.0
 %
 
$
(19.8
)
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefits
9.3

 
(4.4
)
 
(2.4
)
 
(11.8
)
 
5.3

 
(3.0
)
Acquisition costs
5.9

 
(2.8
)
 
(0.4
)
 
(1.9
)
 
8.6

 
(4.9
)
Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets

 

 
(23.1
)
 
(112.5
)
 

 

Reserves for unrecognized tax benefits
0.2

 
(0.1
)
 
0.2

 
1.2

 
(9.3
)
 
5.3

Credits
(7.0
)
 
3.3

 
0.4

 
1.7

 
(3.8
)
 
2.1

Change in valuation allowance
(9.8
)
 
4.7

 
(3.2
)
 
(15.6
)
 
(10.8
)
 
6.1

Excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation
(24.2
)
 
11.4

 

 

 

 

Non-deductible expenses and other
5.3

 
(2.5
)
 
(0.7
)
 
(3.2
)
 
0.7

 
(0.4
)
Tax Act
(45.7
)
 
21.5

 

 

 

 

Income tax benefit (expense) from continuing operations
(31.0
)%
 
$
14.6

 
5.8
 %
 
$
28.0

 
25.7
 %
 
$
(14.6
)
The following table shows the allocation of income tax benefit (expense) between continuing operations and discontinued operations:
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
$
47.1

 
$
(485.9
)
 
$
56.7

Income tax benefit (expense) allocated to continuing operations
14.6

 
28.0

 
(14.6
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
61.7

 
(457.9
)
 
42.1

Income from discontinued operations before income taxes

 
0.4

 
5.7

Income tax benefit (expense) allocated to discontinued operations

 
0.0

 
(0.2
)
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 
0.4

 
5.5

Net income (loss)
$
61.7

 
$
(457.5
)
 
$
47.6


80


As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were:
 
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Deferred tax assets:
 
 
 
Workers’ compensation insurance reserve
$
2.2

 
$
4.1

Allowance for doubtful accounts
3.8

 
4.8

Legal and merger costs
3.4

 
4.6

Federal tax credit carry-forwards
3.3

 

Federal net operating loss carry-forwards
8.6

 
0.4

State net operating loss carry-forwards
6.5

 
0.1

Deferred compensation
0.4

 
0.2

Pre-opening expenses capitalized for tax purposes
1.2

 

Share-based compensation expense—book cost
5.5

 
7.4

Intangible assets
123.3

 
212.8

Master Lease
798.4

 
1,249.6

Accruals, reserves and other
9.7

 
16.3

Less: valuation allowance
(422.7
)
 
(646.7
)
Total deferred tax assets
543.6

 
853.6

Deferred tax liabilities:
 
 
 
Prepaid expenses
(7.5
)
 
(6.1
)
Land, buildings, vessels and equipment, net
(534.6
)
 
(860.7
)
Total deferred tax liabilities
(542.1
)
 
(866.8
)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
$
1.5

 
$
(13.2
)
The following table summarizes the total deferred tax assets and total deferred tax liabilities provided in the previous table:
 
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Total deferred tax assets
$
966.3

 
$
1,500.3

Less: valuation allowance
(422.7
)
 
(646.7
)
Less: total deferred tax liabilities
(542.1
)
 
(866.8
)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
$
1.5

 
$
(13.2
)

As of December 31, 2017 , we continue to provide a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets for all jurisdictions except for certain states, where the deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we consider all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing temporary differences, forecasts of future taxable income, and tax planning strategies. We have a cumulative U.S. pretax accounting loss for the years 2015 through 2017. Considering all available evidence both positive and negative, and in light of the cumulative losses in recent years, we determined that a full valuation allowance was appropriate.

As of April 29, 2016, the Company became a new taxpayer as a result of the Spin-Off and Merger. As a result, all tax attributes carried over from the year ended December 31, 2015 were either utilized during the pre-transaction period of January 1, 2016 through April 28, 2016, or acquired by GLPI. As of December 31, 2017 , our tax filings reflected available General Business Credit (“GBC”) carry-forwards of $3.3 million . The GBC credit carry-forwards will begin to expire in 2036. As of December 31, 2017 , we had $41.1 million of federal net operating loss carry-forwards, which begin to expire in 2036, and $101.4 million of state net operating loss carry-forwards, predominantly in Louisiana and Pennsylvania, which begin to expire in 2026.


81


As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had $4.2 million and $4.5 million , respectively, of uncertain tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. Authoritative guidance requires companies to accrue interest and related penalties, if applicable, on all tax positions for which reserves have been established consistent with jurisdictional tax laws. We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax benefits as a component of income tax benefit (expense). During the year ended December 31, 2017 , there was a net decrease in accrued interest of $0.1 million related to unrecognized tax benefits. We had $0.3 million of cumulative interest accrued as of December 31, 2017 . No penalties were accrued in any of the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 or 2015 .

The following table summarizes the activity related to uncertain tax benefits, excluding any interest or penalties:
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Balance as of January 1
$
4.5

 
$
28.4

 
$
37.7

Gross increases - tax positions in prior periods

 
0.1

 
0.1

Gross decreases - tax positions in prior periods
(0.3
)
 
(21.0
)
 
(6.2
)
Gross increases - tax positions in current period

 

 
1.2

Gross decreases - tax positions in current period

 

 
(1.5
)
Settlements

 
(3.0
)
 
(2.9
)
Balance as of December 31
$
4.2

 
$
4.5

 
$
28.4



82


Note 6—Master Lease Financing Obligation and Lease Obligations

Master Lease Financing Obligation: The Company’s Master Lease with GLPI that is described in Note 2, “Spin-Off, Merger and Master Lease,” is accounted for as a financing obligation. At lease inception, the financing obligation was determined to be $3.2 billion and was calculated based on the future minimum lease payments discounted at 10.5% . For purposes of calculating the financing obligation, beginning in the third year of the lease, the percentage rent was excluded since the payment is contingent upon the achievement of future financial results. The discount rate represented the estimated incremental borrowing rate over the lease term of 35 years , which included renewal options that were reasonably assured of being exercised, at lease inception.

Total lease payments under the Master Lease were as follows:
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Reduction of financing obligation
$
49.8

 
$
31.0

Interest expense attributable to financing obligation
331.1

 
225.1

Total lease payments under the Master Lease
$
380.9

 
$
256.1

   
The future minimum lease payments related to the Master Lease financing obligation, as of December 31, 2017 were as follows (amounts in millions):
Year ended December 31:
 
2018
$
347.3

2019
332.9

2020
332.9

2021
332.9

2022
332.9

Thereafter
9,429.4

Total minimum lease payments
11,108.3

Less: amounts representing interest at 10.5%
(8,155.6
)
Plus: residual values
160.9

Present value of future minimum lease payments
3,113.6

Less: current portion of financing obligation
(24.7
)
Long-term portion of financing obligation
$
3,088.9

Operating Leases: We have certain long-term operating lease obligations, including the Meadows Lease, corporate office space, ground leases at certain locations, water bottom leases in Louisiana, office space and gaming equipment. Minimum lease payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2017 were as follows (amounts in millions):
Year ended December 31:
 
2018
$
35.2

2019
25.3

2020
25.3

2021
25.2

2022
25.3

Thereafter
559.4

 
$
695.7

Total rent expense for these long-term lease obligations for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , was $29.9 million , $19.1 million and $13.6 million , respectively.


83


The Meadows Lease provides for a 10 -year initial term, including renewal terms at our option, up to a total of 29 years . As of December 31, 2017 , annual rent under the Meadows Lease is $25.8 million , payable in monthly installments, and comprised of a base rent of $14.4 million , which is subject to certain adjustments, and a percentage rent of $11.4 million . The base rent is subject to an annual escalation of up to 5% for the initial term or until the lease year in which base rent plus percentage rent is a total of $31.0 million , subject to certain adjustments, and up to 2% thereafter, subject to an Adjusted Revenue to Rent Ratio (as defined in the Meadows Lease) of 1.8 :1 during the second year of the lease, 1.9 :1 during the third year of the lease and 2.0 :1 during the fourth year of the lease and thereafter. The percentage rent is fixed for the first two years and will be adjusted every two years to establish a new fixed amount for the next two -year period equal to 4% of the average annual net revenues during the trailing two -year period.

Former Pinnacle leased underlying land occupied by L’Auberge Lake Charles, River City, Belterra Resort and Ameristar East Chicago. At the time of the Spin-Off and Merger, these leases were assigned to GLPI and GLPI immediately subleased the land back to the Company. As a result, we are responsible for making payments under the terms of each of these land leases, which are made directly to the respective landlords. The annual base rent for the leased L’Auberge Lake Charles land is $1.1 million per year, which adjusts annually for changes in the consumer price index. The annual rent for the leased River City land is the greater of $4.0 million or 2.5% of annual adjusted gross receipts (as defined in the lease agreement). The Belterra Resort land lease currently provides for minimum annual rent payments of $1.5 million , plus 1.5% of gross gaming win (as defined in the lease agreement) in excess of $100.0 million . The Ameristar East Chicago land lease currently provides for minimum annual rent payments of $0.6 million , which adjusts every three years primarily based on changes in the consumer price index.

We lease corporate office space in Las Vegas, Nevada. The base rent for such office space is $2.7 million per year, subject to periodic increases and the lease term is 11  years, subject to certain renewal options.

We are a party to a number of cancelable slot participation and some table game participation arrangements at our various casinos that are customary for casino operations. The slot arrangements generally consist of either a fixed-rent agreement on a per-day basis or a percentage of each slot machine’s gaming revenue, generally payable at month-end. Slot and table game participation fees included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows:
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Slot and table game participation fees
$
26.6

 
$
26.0

 
$
26.5


Note 7—Employee Benefit Plans
Share-based Compensation: Our 2016 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”), which was approved and adopted in April 2016, allows us to grant options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, other stock unit awards and dividend equivalents to directors, employees, consultants and/or advisors of the Company. The 2016 Plan permits the issuance of up to 7.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock, plus any shares subject to awards granted under the Prior Plans and Individual Arrangements (both defined below) which are forfeited, expire or are canceled on or after the effective date of the 2016 Plan. All awards under the 2016 Plan are counted against the 7.5 million share limit as one share for every one share granted. The 2016 Plan had 5.0 million share-based payment awards available for grant as of December 31, 2017 .
Prior to the adoption of the 2016 Plan, Former Pinnacle’s 2015 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) was terminated upon closing of the Spin-Off and Merger and its 2005 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan” and together with the 2015 Plan, the “Prior Plans”) expired on April 1, 2015.
In 2008 and 2010, in order to recruit our executive officers, we granted options outside of the 2005 Plan for the purchase of 850,000 shares of common stock, all of which remained outstanding as of December 31, 2017 . Additionally, in connection with the acquisition of Ameristar Casinos, Inc. (“ Ameristar ”) in 2013, outside of the 2005 Plan, we granted new employees, who were former employees of Ameristar , options to purchase shares of common stock and restricted stock units (collectively, these grants are referred to as “Individual Agreements”).
As of December 31, 2017 , we had 7.8 million share-based payment awards outstanding, including stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock.


84


Stock Options: Options are granted at the current market price at the date of grant. The following tables summarize information related to our stock options:
 
Number of Stock Options
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price
 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
(in years)
 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
(in millions)
Options outstanding as of January 1, 2017
6,387,115

 
$
6.16

 
 
 
 
Granted
20,000

 
$
19.30

 
 
 
 
Exercised
(1,257,581
)
 
$
4.57

 
 
 
 
Canceled or forfeited
(122,812
)
 
$
9.13

 
 
 
 
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2017
5,026,722

 
$
6.53

 
2.99
 
$
131.7

Options exercisable as of December 31, 2017
3,726,796

 
$
5.15

 
2.30
 
$
102.8

Expected to vest as of December 31, 2017
1,060,098

 
$
10.56

 
4.98
 
$
23.5

 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions, except grant date fair value)
Weighted average grant date fair value
$
6.37

 
$
4.06

 
$
10.91

Intrinsic value of stock options exercised
$
19.8

 
$
2.7

 
$
8.1

Net cash proceeds from exercise of stock options
$
4.7

 
$
2.7

 
$
9.3

Unamortized compensation costs not yet expensed related to stock options granted totaled $3.8 million as of December 31, 2017 and the weighted average period over which the costs are expected to be recognized is 1.2 years . The associated shares were newly-issued common stock.
Restricted Stock Units: The following table summarizes information related to our restricted stock units:
 
Number of Units
 
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested as of January 1, 2017
2,183,056

 
$
9.65

Granted
578,180

 
$
19.06

Vested
(1,060,599
)
 
$
8.61

Canceled or forfeited
(176,108
)
 
$
12.61

Non-vested as of December 31, 2017
1,524,529

 
$
13.61


Unamortized compensation costs not yet expensed related to non-vested restricted stock units totaled $16.0 million as of December 31, 2017 and the weighted average period over which the costs are expected to be recognized is 1.3 years .


85


Restricted Stock: The Company grants restricted stock awards, which are subject to either market or performance conditions. The grant date fair value of the awards subject to market conditions was determined using the Monte Carlo simulation. The grant date fair value of the awards subject to performance conditions was determined as the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. To the extent that restricted stock awards are forfeited, the forfeited shares will be included in treasury stock. The following table summarizes information related to our restricted stock:
 
Number of Shares
 
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested as of January 1, 2017
340,620

 
$
14.24

Granted
713,470

 
$
20.92

Canceled or forfeited
(11,428
)
 
$
18.70

Non-vested as of December 31, 2017
1,042,662

 
$
18.77


The unamortized compensation costs not yet expensed related to restricted stock totaled $9.8 million as of December 31, 2017 and the weighted average period over which the costs are expected to be recognized is 1.5 years .

Performance Stock Units: The following table summarizes information related to our performance stock units:
 
Number of Units
 
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested as of January 1, 2017
108,855

 
$
7.84

Vested
(108,855
)
 
$
7.84

Non-vested as of December 31, 2017

 
$

Compensation Cost: We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the Monte Carlo simulation in order to calculate the compensation cost of employee share-based compensation. Such models require the use of subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the option, the expected volatility of the underlying stock and the expected dividend on the stock.
In computing the share-based compensation, the following is a weighted average of the assumptions used:
 
 
Risk-Free Interest Rate
 
Expected Life at Issuance
(in years)
 
Expected Volatility
 
Expected Dividends
Options granted in the following periods:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2017
 
1.8
%
 
5.37
 
32.7
%
 
None
2016
 
1.3
%
 
5.29
 
37.1
%
 
None
2015
 
1.4
%
 
5.22
 
36.8
%
 
None
The expected volatility was derived from an analysis of both the historic actual volatility of our common stock and the implied volatilities of traded options in our common stock. Future volatility may be substantially less or greater than the expected volatility. We do not currently pay dividends and we do not anticipate that dividends will be paid within the average expected life of existing options. U.S. Treasury rates with similar maturities are used as the proxy for the risk-free interest rate. The expected life at issuance is based on our experience as to the average historical term of option grants that were exercised, canceled or forfeited. The total compensation cost recognized was as follows:
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Share-based compensation expense
$
14.7

 
$
35.5

 
$
17.8

In connection with the Spin-Off and Merger, each outstanding vested and non-vested share-based payment award granted by Former Pinnacle on or prior to July 16, 2015 (“Pre-July 2015 Former Pinnacle Awards”) were converted into a combination of (1) corresponding share-based payment awards of the Company, which have continued to vest on the same schedule as Pre-July 2015 Former Pinnacle Awards based on service with the Company, and (2) adjusted Pre-July 2015 Former Pinnacle

86


Awards, which immediately became fully-vested and were settled in shares of GLPI common stock. As a result, during the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded $22.6 million of incremental expense attributable to the accelerated vesting of adjusted Pre-July 2015 Former Pinnacle Awards.
Excluding the accelerated vesting of adjusted Pre-July 2015 Former Pinnacle Awards, the total fair value of share-based payment awards that vested during the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 was $12.8 million , $10.7 million and $13.6 million , respectively.

Directors Deferred Compensation Plan: Any director may elect to receive phantom stock units in lieu of payment of an annual retainer and board fees under the Company’s Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. Phantom stock units are fully expensed when granted. Each phantom stock unit is the economic equivalent of one share of our common stock. Units of phantom stock are payable in common stock following the director’s cessation of service as a director for any reason.

401(k) Plan: We maintain the Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. 401(k) Investment Plan (the “401(k) Plan”). The 401(k) Plan is an employee benefit plan subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and is intended to be a qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Participants of the 401(k) Plan may contribute up to 100% of pretax income, subject to the legal limitation ( $18,000 for 2017 ). In addition, participants who are age 50 or older may make an additional contribution to the 401(k) Plan, commonly referred to as a “catch-up” contribution ( $6,000 for 2017 ). We consider discretionary matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan, which vest ratably over four to five years. The match formula is 50% up to 3% of eligible compensation for all eligible participants. For the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan totaled $3.8 million , $3.7 million and $3.6 million , respectively.

Executive Deferred Compensation Plan: We maintain an Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Executive Plan”), which allows certain highly compensated employees to defer, on a pre-tax basis, a portion of their annual base salary and bonus. Participation in the Executive Plan is limited. A participant is at all times fully vested in his or her contributions, as well as any attributable appreciation or depreciation thereof. We do not make matching contributions to the Executive Plan for the benefit of participating employees and the payment of benefits under the Executive Plan is an unsecured obligation. The total obligation under the Executive Plan and the cash surrender value of insurance policies are as follows:
 
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Total obligation under Executive Plan (1)
$
8.9

 
$
8.3

Cash surrender value of insurance policies (2)
$
2.8

 
$
2.9

(1)
Recorded in “Other long-term liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)
Recorded in “Other assets, net” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


87


Note 8—Investment and Acquisition Activities

Acquisition of the Meadows Business: On September 9, 2016, we closed on the purchase agreement with GLPC pursuant to which we acquired all of the equity interests of the Meadows located in Washington, Pennsylvania for base consideration of $138.0 million , subject to certain adjustments. The purchase price, after giving effect to such adjustments, was $134.0 million and the cash paid for the Meadows business, net of cash acquired, was $107.5 million . As a result of the transaction, we own and operate the Meadows’ gaming, entertainment and harness racing business subject to the Meadows Lease, which is discussed in Note 6, “Master Lease Financing Obligation and Lease Obligations,” and we recorded $18.8 million of goodwill, which has been assigned to our Midwest segment. In the second quarter 2017, management finalized the purchase price allocation, which did not result in any adjustments to the recorded goodwill balance.

Retama Park Racetrack: We hold 75.5% of the equity of Pinnacle Retama Partners, LLC (“ PRP ”), which owns the racing license of Retama Park Racetrack located outside of San Antonio, Texas. We consolidate the accounts of PRP in our Consolidated Financial Statements . We also manage Retama Park Racetrack under a management contract with Retama Development Corporation (“ RDC ”), a local government corporation of the City of Selma, Texas.

In the second quarter 2015, we determined that there was an indication of impairment on the intangible assets of PRP due to the lack of legislative progress and on-going negative operating results at Retama Park Racetrack. As a result, as noted in Note 9, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” during the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded non-cash impairments of the goodwill of PRP and the racing license of Retama Park Racetrack in the amounts of $3.3 million  and  $5.0 million , respectively.

As of December 31, 2017 , PRP held $16.9 million in promissory notes issued by RDC and $7.5 million in local government corporation bonds issued by RDC , at amortized cost. The promissory notes and local government corporation bonds, which are included in “Other assets, net” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, have long-term contractual maturities and are collateralized by the assets of Retama Park Racetrack. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment on the local government corporation bonds of $3.8 million , which is included in “Write-downs, reserves and recoveries, net” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 11, “Write-downs, reserves and recoveries, net.”

The contractual terms of these promissory notes include interest payments due at maturity; however, we have not recorded accrued interest on these promissory notes because uncertainty exists as to RDC’s ability to make interest payments. We have the positive intent and ability to hold the local government corporation bonds to maturity and until the amortized cost is recovered.

88


Note 9—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following tables set forth changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and other intangible assets:
 
December 31, 2017
 
Weighted Average Remaining Useful Life (in years)
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Additions
 
Cumulative Amortization
 
Cumulative Impairment Losses
 
Intangible Assets, Net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Goodwill:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Midwest segment
Indefinite
 
$
605.7

 
$

 
$

 
$
(124.5
)
 
$
481.2

South segment
Indefinite
 
248.3

 

 

 
(157.7
)
 
90.6

West segment
Indefinite
 
78.2

 

 

 
(39.1
)
 
39.1

Other
Indefinite
 
5.9

 

 

 
(5.9
)
 

 
 
 
938.1

 

 

 
(327.2
)
 
610.9

Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gaming licenses
Indefinite
 
374.9

 

 

 
(144.1
)
 
230.8

Racing license
Indefinite
 
5.0

 

 

 
(5.0
)
 

Trade names
Indefinite
 
202.2

 

 

 
(61.7
)
 
140.5

 
 
 
582.1

 

 

 
(210.8
)
 
371.3

Amortizing Intangible Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Player relationships
2
 
75.1

 

 
(66.0
)
 
(0.7
)
 
8.4

Favorable leasehold interests
28
 
4.4

 

 
(0.5
)
 

 
3.9

 
 
 
79.5

 

 
(66.5
)
 
(0.7
)
 
12.3

Total Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
 
 
$
1,599.7

 
$

 
$
(66.5
)
 
$
(538.7
)
 
$
994.5

 
December 31, 2016
 
Weighted Average Remaining Useful Life (in years)
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Additions
 
Cumulative Amortization
 
Cumulative Impairment Losses
 
Intangible Assets, Net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Goodwill:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Midwest segment
Indefinite
 
$
586.9

 
$
18.8

 
$

 
$
(124.5
)
 
$
481.2

South segment
Indefinite
 
248.3

 

 

 
(157.7
)
 
90.6

West segment
Indefinite
 
78.2

 

 

 
(39.1
)
 
39.1

Other
Indefinite
 
5.9

 

 

 
(5.9
)
 

 
 
 
919.3

 
18.8

 

 
(327.2
)
 
610.9

Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gaming licenses
Indefinite
 
318.6

 
56.3

 

 
(144.1
)
 
230.8

Racing license
Indefinite
 
5.0

 

 

 
(5.0
)
 

Trade names
Indefinite
 
187.2

 
15.0

 

 
(61.7
)
 
140.5

 
 
 
510.8

 
71.3

 

 
(210.8
)
 
371.3

Amortizing Intangible Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Player relationships
3
 
75.1

 

 
(57.3
)
 
(0.7
)
 
17.1

Favorable leasehold interests
29
 
4.4

 

 
(0.4
)
 

 
4.0

 
 
 
79.5

 

 
(57.7
)
 
(0.7
)
 
21.1

Total Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
 
 
$
1,509.6

 
$
90.1

 
$
(57.7
)
 
$
(538.7
)
 
$
1,003.3


89


As of December 31, 2017 , one reporting unit within each of our reportable segments had a negative carrying amount, which is principally due to the allocation of the Master Lease financing obligation. The amount of goodwill at these reporting units was $5.5 million , $12.4 million and $4.9 million , within the Midwest, South and West segments, respectively, as of December 31, 2017 . The impairment charges discussed below are included in “Impairment of goodwill” and “Impairment of other intangible assets,” as appropriate, in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

2017 Annual Assessment for Impairment: During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company completed its 2017 annual assessment for impairment, which did not result in any impairment charges to goodwill or other intangible assets.

2016 Annual and Interim Assessments for Impairment: As a result of our 2016 annual assessment for impairment, we recognized non-cash impairments of goodwill and gaming licenses in the amounts of $1.2 million and $17.0 million , respectively, which were primarily driven by revisions to our operating projections. The goodwill impairment pertained to Heartland Poker Tour (“HPT”), our live and televised poker tournament series, and the gaming license impairments pertained to our Midwest segment. The estimated fair values of the reporting unit and gaming licenses were determined by using discounted cash flow models, which utilized Level 3 inputs.

The Spin-Off and Merger transactions, which closed on April 28, 2016, represented a significant financial restructuring event that increased our cash flow obligations in connection with the Master Lease, which we concluded represented an indicator that impairment may exist on our goodwill and other intangible assets. Consequently, we completed interim impairment assessments on goodwill, gaming licenses and trade names. As a result of these interim impairment assessments, we recognized non-cash impairments to goodwill, gaming licenses and trade names totaling $321.3 million , $68.5 million and $61.0 million , respectively.

The goodwill impairments pertained to our Midwest, South and West segments, in the amounts of $124.5 million , $157.7 million and $39.1 million , respectively. The gaming license impairments pertained to our Midwest segment and the trade name impairments related to our Midwest, South and West segments, in the amounts of $35.3 million , $22.2 million and $3.5 million , respectively. The estimated fair values of the reporting units, gaming licenses and trade names were determined by using discounted cash flow models, which utilized Level 3 inputs.

The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements of other indefinite-lived intangible assets as of the valuation dates below:
 
Fair Value
(in millions)
 
Valuation Technique
 
Unobservable Input
 
Range or Amount
As of October 1, 2016:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gaming Licenses
$
82.5

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
9.8% - 15.0%
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term revenue growth rate
 
2.0%
As of April 28, 2016:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gaming Licenses
$
99.5

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
8.8% - 15.9%
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term revenue growth rate
 
2.0%
Trade Names
$
125.5

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
14.9% - 15.1%
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term revenue growth rate
 
2.0%
 
 
 
 
 
Pre-tax royalty rate
 
1.5% - 1.8%

90


The following table presents a summary of fair value measurements by level for the goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using:
 
 
 
Total Fair Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total Impairment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
As of October 1, 2016:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
1.2

Gaming licenses
$
82.5

 
$

 
$

 
$
82.5

 
$
17.0

As of April 28, 2016:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill
$
115.9

 
$

 
$

 
$
115.9

 
$
321.3

Gaming licenses
$
99.5

 
$

 
$

 
$
99.5

 
$
68.5

Trade names
$
125.5

 
$

 
$

 
$
125.5

 
$
61.0

2015 Annual and Interim Assessments for Impairment: As a result of our 2015 annual assessment for impairment, we recognized non-cash impairments of a gaming license and a trade name in the amounts of $27.5 million and $0.5 million , respectively. The gaming license impairment, which pertained to our Midwest segment, was primarily driven by operating results of one of our reporting units being below expectations, which resulted in revisions to our long-term operating projections for this property. The trade name impairment, which pertained to our West segment, was primarily the result of updated assumptions used in the analysis, such as the discount rate. The fair values of the gaming license and trade name were estimated by using discounted cash flow models, which utilized Level 3 inputs.

During 2015, as a result of separate interim assessments for impairment, we recognized non-cash impairments of the goodwill of PRP and HPT in the amounts of $3.3 million and $1.4 million , respectively, and non-cash impairments of the racing license of Retama Park Racetrack, the HPT trade name and the HPT player relationship, in the amounts of $5.0 million , $0.2 million and $0.7 million , respectively. For PRP, we determined that there was an indicator that impairment may exist on its goodwill and other intangible assets as a result of the lack of legislative progress and on-going negative operating results at Retama Park Racetrack. For HPT, we determined that there was an indicator that impairment may exist on its goodwill and other intangible assets due to its operating performance. The estimated fair values of the reporting units, the racing license, the trade name and the player relationship were determined by using discounted cash flow models. In the case of PRP, the cash flows were probability-weighted.
Acquisition of the Meadows Business: On September 9, 2016, we closed on a purchase agreement with GLPC pursuant to which we acquired all of the equity interests of the Meadows located in Washington, Pennsylvania. As a result of the acquisition, which is discussed in further detail in Note 8, “Investment and Acquisition Activities,” we recorded $18.8 million to goodwill and $56.3 million and $15.0 million to gaming licenses and trade names, respectively.

Acquisition of Belterra Park s VLT License: During 2014, we recorded a $50.0 million intangible asset related to Belterra Park’s video lottery terminal (“VLT”) license. We made payments of $25.0 million for Belterra Park’s VLT license during 2014 and in April 2015, we made our final installment payment of  $25.0 million . As of December 31, 2017 , the carrying amount of Belterra Park’s VLT license was $0.5 million .

Amortizing Intangible Assets: Player relationships are amortized on an accelerated basis over an approximate weighted average remaining useful life of 2 years. Favorable leasehold interests are amortized on a straight-line basis over an approximate weighted average remaining useful life of 28 years.


91


The aggregate amortization expense for amortizing intangible assets was  $8.8 million , $11.9 million and $15.9 million , for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . Estimated future annual amortization is as follows:

 
Player Relationships
 
Favorable Leasehold Interests
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Year ended December 31:
 
 
 
 
 
2018
$
6.3

 
$
0.1

 
$
6.4

2019
2.0

 
0.1

 
2.1

2020
0.1

 
0.1

 
0.2

2021

 
0.1

 
0.1

2022

 
0.1

 
0.1

Thereafter

 
3.4

 
3.4

Total
$
8.4

 
$
3.9

 
$
12.3


Note 10—Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale
Assets held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying amount or estimated fair value less cost to sell. The results of operations of a component or group of components that has either been disposed of or is classified as held for sale is included in discontinued operations when certain criteria are met. The fair value of the assets sold was determined using a market approach using Level 2 inputs, as defined in Note 1, “Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Discontinued Operations

Boomtown Reno: In April 2015, we completed the sale of approximately 783 acres of excess land associated with our former Boomtown Reno operations, with a carrying amount of $8.3 million , for cash consideration of $13.1 million , resulting in a gain on disposition of $4.8 million , net of costs to sell.

Ameristar Lake Charles: In November 2013, we closed the sale of the equity interests of our subsidiary, which was constructing the Ameristar Lake Charles development project. At the time of the sale, we received $209.8 million in cash consideration and $10.0 million in deferred consideration in the form of a note receivable from the buyer, which we collected in July 2016.

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes was as follows:
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Income before income taxes
$

 
$
0.4

 
$
5.7

Income tax benefit (expense)

 
0.0

 
(0.2
)
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
$

 
$
0.4

 
$
5.5


Assets Held for Sale

Springfield, Massachusetts: In April 2015, we completed the sale of approximately 40 acres of land in Springfield, Massachusetts, originally purchased by Ameristar for a possible future casino resort, with a carrying amount of $3.5 million , for cash consideration of $12.0 million , resulting in a gain on disposition of $8.4 million , net of costs to sell. This gain is included in “Write-downs, reserves and recoveries, net” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 11, “Write-downs, reserves and recoveries, net.”

Central City, Colorado:   In March 2016, we completed the sale of approximately two acres of land in Central City, Colorado, which had a carrying amount of $0.3 million , for cash consideration of $0.3 million . During the year ended December 31, 2015, in order to reduce the carrying amount of this land to its estimated fair value less costs to sell, we recorded

92


a total of $3.0 million in non-cash impairment charges, which is included in “Write-downs, reserves and recoveries, net” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 11, “Write-downs, reserves and recoveries, net.”

Note 11—Write-downs, Reserves and Recoveries, Net

Write-downs, reserves and recoveries, net, consisted of the following :
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Loss on disposals of long-lived assets, net
$
10.2

 
$
16.2

 
$
0.3

Impairment of held-to-maturity securities
3.8

 

 

Impairment of long-lived assets
0.1

 
0.2

 
3.2

Other
1.7

 
0.5

 
(0.8
)
Write-downs, reserves and recoveries, net
$
15.8

 
$
16.9

 
$
2.7


Loss on disposals of long-lived assets, net: During the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , we recorded net losses of $10.2 million , $16.2 million and $8.7 million , respectively, related primarily to disposals of furniture, fixtures and equipment at the properties in the normal course of business. Additionally, as discussed in Note 10, “Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale,” during the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded a gain on the sale of land in Springfield, Massachusetts of $8.4 million .

Impairment of held-to-maturity securities: As discussed in Note 8, “Investment and Acquisition Activities,” during the year ended December 31, 2017 , we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment on our local government corporation bonds issued by RDC.

Impairment of long-lived assets: During the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015, we recorded non-cash impairments of furniture, fixtures and equipment at the properties in the normal course of business. Additionally, as discussed in Note 10, “Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale,” during the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded a total of $3.0 million in non-cash impairment charges on land in Central City, Colorado, previously classified as held for sale.

Note 12—Commitments and Contingencies

Self-Insurance: We are self-insured up to certain limits for costs associated with general liability, workers’ compensation and employee health coverage. Insurance reserves include accruals for estimated settlements for known claims, as well as accruals for estimates of claims not yet made. As of December 31, 2017 , and 2016 , we had total self-insurance accruals of $23.3 million and $26.1 million , respectively, which are included in “Total current liabilities” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Other:    We are a party to a number of pending legal proceedings. Management does not expect that the outcome of such proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.


93


Note 13—Segment Information
We view each of our operating businesses as an operating segment with the exception of our two businesses in Jackpot, Nevada, which we view as one operating segment. Operating segments are aggregated based on their similar economic characteristics, types of customers, types of services provided, the regulatory environments in which they operate, and their management and reporting structure. We have aggregated our operating segments into three reportable segments based on the similar characteristics of the operating segments within the regions in which they operate: Midwest, South and West. Corporate expenses and other is included in the following segment disclosures to reconcile to consolidated results.
We use Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR (as defined below) and Adjusted EBITDAR (as defined below) for each reportable segment to compare operating results and allocate resources. The following table highlights our revenues and Adjusted EBITDAR for each reportable segment and reconciles Income (loss) from continuing operations to Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
Midwest segment (a)
$
1,547.0

 
$
1,359.9

 
$
1,265.6

South segment (a)
767.1

 
777.1

 
793.3

West segment (a)
242.2

 
236.0

 
226.6

 
2,556.3

 
2,373.0

 
2,285.5

Corporate and other (b)
5.6

 
5.9

 
6.4

Total revenues
$
2,561.9

 
$
2,378.9

 
$
2,291.9

Adjusted EBITDAR (c):
 
 
 
 
 
Midwest segment (a)
$
439.8

 
$
402.4

 
$
379.3

South segment (a)
250.3

 
246.1

 
239.0

West segment (a)
93.1

 
88.4

 
81.7

 
783.2

 
736.9

 
700.0

Corporate expenses and other (b)
(81.3
)
 
(82.4
)
 
(83.0
)
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR (c)
$
701.9

 
$
654.5

 
$
617.0

 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
61.7

 
$
(457.9
)
 
$
42.1

Rent expense under the Meadows Lease
16.3

 
5.1

 

Depreciation and amortization
217.0

 
218.3

 
242.5

Pre-opening, development and other costs
9.5

 
56.0

 
14.2

Non-cash share-based compensation
14.7

 
35.5

 
17.8

Impairment of goodwill

 
322.5

 
4.7

Impairment of other intangible assets

 
146.5

 
33.9

Write-downs, reserves and recoveries, net
15.8

 
16.9

 
2.7

Interest expense, net
380.9

 
334.3

 
244.4

Loss on early extinguishment of debt
0.5

 
5.2

 

Loss from equity method investment
0.1

 
0.1

 
0.1

Income tax expense (benefit)
(14.6
)
 
(28.0
)
 
14.6

Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR (c)
$
701.9

 
$
654.5

 
$
617.0

 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital expenditures:
 
 
 
 
 
Midwest segment (a)
$
42.7

 
$
56.3

 
$
45.6

South segment (a)
23.0

 
27.7

 
24.1

West segment (a)
5.7

 
10.6

 
9.9

Corporate and other, including development projects
7.5

 
3.3

 
4.4

 
$
78.9

 
$
97.9

 
$
84.0



94


 
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Assets:
 
 
 
Midwest segment (a)
$
2,444.3

 
$
2,511.7

South segment (a)
952.9

 
999.9

West segment (a)
477.0

 
490.6

Corporate and other, including development projects
334.8

 
333.7

Eliminations
(258.8
)
 
(258.8
)
 
$
3,950.2

 
$
4,077.1


(a)
See Note 1, “Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” for a listing of properties included in each reportable segment.

(b)
Corporate and other includes revenues from HPT and management fees associated with Retama Park Racetrack. Corporate expenses represent payroll, professional fees, travel expenses and other general and administrative expenses not directly related to our casino and hotel operations. Corporate expenses that are directly attributable to a property are allocated to each applicable property. Other includes expenses relating to the operation of HPT and management of Retama Park Racetrack.

(c)
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR is a non-GAAP financial measure. We define Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR as earnings before interest income and expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent expense associated with the Meadows Lease, pre-opening, development and other costs, non-cash share-based compensation, asset impairment costs, write-downs, reserves, recoveries, gain (loss) on sale of certain assets, loss on early extinguishment of debt, gain (loss) on sale of equity security investments, income (loss) from equity method investments, non-controlling interest and discontinued operations. We define Adjusted EBITDAR for each reportable segment as earnings before interest income and expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent expense associated with the Meadows Lease, pre-opening, development and other costs, non-cash share-based compensation, asset impairment costs, write-downs, reserves, recoveries, inter-company management fees, gain (loss) on sale of certain assets, gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt, gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations and discontinued operations. We define Adjusted EBITDAR margin as Adjusted EBITDAR for the segment divided by segment revenues. We use Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR for each segment to compare operating results among our businesses and between accounting periods. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR have economic substance because they are used by management as measures to analyze the performance of our business and are especially relevant in evaluating large, long-lived casino-hotel projects because they provide a perspective on the current effects of operating decisions separated from the substantial non-operational depreciation charges and financing costs of such projects. We eliminate the results from discontinued operations at the time they are deemed discontinued. We also review pre-opening, development and other costs separately, as such expenses are also included in total project costs when assessing budgets and project returns, and because such costs relate to anticipated future revenues and income. We believe that Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR are useful measures for investors because they are indicators of the performance of ongoing business operations. These calculations are commonly used as a basis for investors, analysts and credit rating agencies to evaluate and compare operating performance and value of companies within our industry. In addition, Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR approximates the measures used in the debt covenants within the Company’s debt agreements. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR do not include depreciation or interest expense and, therefore, do not reflect current or future capital expenditures or the cost of capital. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR should not be considered as an alternative to operating income (loss) as an indicator of performance, or as an alternative to any other measure provided in accordance with GAAP. Our calculations of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR may be different from the calculation methods used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited.

95


Note 14—Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
The following is a summary of unaudited quarterly financial data for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 :
 
2017
 
Dec. 31
 
Sept. 30
 
Jun. 30
 
Mar. 31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions, except per share data)
Revenues
$
620.8

 
$
647.4

 
$
653.6

 
$
640.0

Operating income
$
99.4

 
$
111.7

 
$
106.4

 
$
111.0

Net income
$
22.2

 
$
13.9

 
$
8.4

 
$
17.2

Net income attributable to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.
$
22.4

 
$
14.1

 
$
9.4

 
$
17.2

Per Share Data (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income—basic
$
0.40

 
$
0.25

 
$
0.17

 
$
0.31

Net income—diluted
$
0.36

 
$
0.23

 
$
0.15

 
$
0.28

 
2016
 
Dec. 31
 
Sept. 30 (b)
 
Jun. 30 (c)
 
Mar. 31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions, except per share data)
Revenues
$
637.4

 
$
595.2

 
$
566.2

 
$
580.0

Operating income (loss)
$
84.6

 
$
97.3

 
$
(433.9
)
 
$
105.7

Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
(9.0
)
 
$
(0.5
)
 
$
(489.2
)
 
$
40.9

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 
0.0

 
0.3

 
0.1

Net income (loss)
$
(9.0
)
 
$
(0.5
)
 
$
(488.9
)
 
$
41.0

Net income (loss) attributable to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.
$
(9.0
)
 
$
(0.5
)
 
$
(488.9
)
 
$
41.0

Per Share Data—Basic (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
(0.16
)
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(8.04
)
 
$
0.67

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 
0.00

 
0.00

 
0.00

Net income (loss)—basic
$
(0.16
)
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(8.04
)
 
$
0.67

Per Share Data—Diluted (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
(0.16
)
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(8.04
)
 
$
0.65

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 
0.00

 
0.00

 
0.00

Net income (loss)—diluted
$
(0.16
)
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(8.04
)
 
$
0.65

(a)
Net income (loss) per share calculations for each quarter is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the respective periods; accordingly, the sum of the quarters may not equal the full-year income (loss) per share.
(b)
As discussed in Note 8, “Investment and Acquisition Activities,” we acquired the Meadows business on September 9, 2016.
(c)
As discussed in Note 9, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” as a result of the Spin-Off and Merger, during the three months ended June 30, 2016, we recognized non-cash impairments to goodwill, gaming licenses and trade names totaling $321.3 million , $68.5 million and $61.0 million , respectively.


96


Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
(a) Management’s Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and the Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2017 . Based on this evaluation, the Company’s management, including the CEO and the CFO, concluded that, as of December 31, 2017 , the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in that they provide a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the CEO and the CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, there can be no assurance that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures will detect or uncover all failures of persons within the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in the Company’s periodic reports. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving their control objectives.

(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s CEO and CFO, and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the Company’s financial reporting.

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 . This evaluation was performed using the internal control evaluation framework developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on such evaluation, management has concluded that, as of such date, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2017 , that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Ernst & Young LLP has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This report follows in Item 9A(c).

97

Table of Contents

(c) Attestation report of the independent registered public accounting firm.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 , based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 , based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 , and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”) and our report dated March 1, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
Las Vegas, Nevada
March 1, 2018

98

Table of Contents

Item 9B.
Other Information
None.

PART III

Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required under this item will be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2017 , under the captions “Election of Directors—General,” “Election of Directors—Information Regarding the Director Nominees,” “Election of Directors—Executive Officers,” “Election of Directors—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Election of Directors—Code of Ethical Business Conduct,” and the information regarding our audit committee and our audit committee financial expert in “Election of Directors—Board Meetings and Board Committees” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11.
Executive Compensation
The information required under this item will be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2017 , under the captions “Election of Directors—Director Compensation,” “Election of Directors—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Executive Compensation—Compensation Committee Report” and “Executive Compensation” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required under this item will be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2017 , under the captions “Election of Directors—Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Executive Compensation—Equity Compensation Plan Information at Fiscal Year-End” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required under this item will be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2017 , under the captions “Election of Directors—Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons” and “Election of Directors—Director Independence” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required under this item will be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2017 , under the caption “Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2018 —Audit and Related Fees” and is incorporated herein by reference.

99

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Documents filed as a part of this report.
1.
Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data: The following financial statements are included herein under Item 8 of Part II of this report, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”:
 
Page
Number
2. Financial Statement Schedule
 
Page
Number
All other schedules have been omitted for the reason that the required information is presented in the financial statements or notes thereto, the amounts involved are not significant or the schedules are not applicable.

100

Table of Contents

3.
Exhibits
Exhibit
 
 
Number
 
Description of Exhibit
2.1††
 
 
 
 
2.2††
 
 
 
 
2.3††
 
 
 
 
2.4††
 
 
 
 
2.5
 
 
 
 
2.6
 
 
 
 
2.7
 
 
 
 
2.8
 
 
 
 
2.9
 
 
 
 
2.10††
 
 
 
 
2.11
 
 
 
 
2.12
 
 
 
 
2.13
 

101

Table of Contents

Exhibit
 
 
Number
 
Description of Exhibit
2.14††
 
 
 
 
2.15
 
 
 
 
2.16
 
 
 
 
2.17††
 
 
 
 
2.18
 
 
 
 
2.19
 
 
 
 
2.20
 
 
 
 
2.21
 
 
 
 
2.22
 
 
 
 
2.23††
 
 
 
 
2.24
 
 
 
 
3.1*
 

102

Table of Contents

Exhibit
 
 
Number
 
Description of Exhibit
3.2
 
 
 
 
4.1†
 
 
 
 
4.2†
 
 
 
 
4.3†
 
 
 
 
4.4†
 
 
 
 
4.5†
 
 
 
 
4.6†
 
 
 
 
4.7†
 
 
 
 
4.8†
 
 
 
 
4.9†
 
 
 
 
4.10†
 
 
 
 
4.11†
 
 
 
 
4.12†
 
 
 
 
4.13†
 
 
 
 

103

Table of Contents

Exhibit
 
 
Number
 
Description of Exhibit
4.14†
 
 
 
 
4.15†
 
 
 
 
4.16†
 
 
 
 
4.17†
 
 
 
 
4.18†
 
 
 
 
4.19†
 
 
 
 
4.20†
 
 
 
 
4.21†
 
 
 
 
4.22†
 
 
 
 
4.23†*
 
 
 
 
4.24†*
 
 
 
 
4.25
 
 
 
 
4.26
 
 
 
 
4.27
 
 
 
 
4.28
 
 
 
 

104

Table of Contents

Exhibit
 
 
Number
 
Description of Exhibit
10.1†
 
 
 
 
10.2†
 
 
 
 
10.3
 
 
 
 
10.4†
 
 
 
 
10.5†
 
 
 
 
10.6†
 
 
 
 
10.7†
 
 
 
 
10.8†
 
 
 
 
10.9†
 
 
 
 
10.10†
 
 
 
 
10.11†
 
 
 
 
10.12†
 
 
 
 
10.13†
 
 
 
 
10.14†
 
 
 
 
10.15†*
 
 
 
 

105

Table of Contents

Exhibit
 
 
Number
 
Description of Exhibit
10.16†
 
 
 
 
10.17†
 
 
 
 
10.18†
 
 
 
 
10.19†
 
 
 
 
10.20†
 
 
 
 
10.21†
 
 
 
 
10.22†
 
 
 
 
10.23†
 
 
 
 
10.24†
 
 
 
 
10.25†
 
 
 
 
10.26†*
 
 
 
 
10.27
 
 
 
 
10.28†
 
 
 
 
10.29
 
 
 
 
10.30
 

106

Table of Contents

Exhibit
 
 
Number
 
Description of Exhibit
10.31
 
 
 
 
10.32
 
 
 
 
10.33*
 
 
 
 
10.34
 
 
 
 
10.35
 
 
 
 
11*
 
 
 
 
12*
 
 
 
 
21*
 
 
 
 
23.1*
 
 
 
 
31.1*
 
 
 
 
31.2*
 
 
 
 
32**
 
 
 
 
99.1*
 
 
 
 
99.2
 
 
 
 
101**
 
Financial statements from Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2017, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language):
(i)
the Consolidated Balance Sheets,
(ii)
the Consolidated Statements of Operations,
(iii)
the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss),
(iv)
the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit),
(v)
the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and
(vi)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements .
 
 
 
*
 
Filed herewith.
**
 
Furnished herewith.
 
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
††
 
Schedules and Exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. Pinnacle hereby undertakes to furnish supplemental copies of any of the omitted schedules upon request by the SEC.

107

Table of Contents

Item 16.
Form 10-K Summary
Not applicable.


108

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
(Registrant)
Date:
March 1, 2018
By:  
/s/ Anthony M. Sanfilippo  
 
 
 
Anthony M. Sanfilippo 
 
 
 
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By:
 
/s/ Anthony M. Sanfilippo
 
Date:
March 1, 2018
 
 
Anthony M. Sanfilippo
 
 
 
 
 
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Carlos A. Ruisanchez
 
Date:
March 1, 2018
 
 
Carlos A. Ruisanchez
 
 
 
 
 
President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
 
 
 
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Charles L. Atwood
 
Date:
March 1, 2018
 
 
Charles L. Atwood
 
 
 
 
 
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Stephen C. Comer
 
Date:
March 1, 2018
 
 
Stephen C. Comer
 
 
 
 
 
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Ron Huberman
 
Date:
March 1, 2018
 
 
Ron Huberman
 
 
 
 
 
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
 
/s/ James L. Martineau  
 
Date:
March 1, 2018
 
 
James L. Martineau
 
 
 
 
 
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Jaynie Miller Studenmund
 
Date:
March 1, 2018
 
 
Jaynie Miller Studenmund
 
 
 
 
 
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Desirée Rogers
 
Date:
March 1, 2018
 
 
Desirée Rogers
 
 
 
 
 
Director
 
 
 


Table of Contents

PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For the years ended December 31, 2015 , 2016 and 2017
(amounts in thousands)
 
 
As of
 
2015
 
As of
 
2016
 
As of
 
2017
 
As of
Description
 
1/1/2015
 
Additions
 
Deductions
 
12/31/2015
 
Additions
 
Deductions
 
12/31/2016
 
Additions
 
Deductions
 
12/31/2017
Allowance for doubtful accounts
 
$
4,963

 
$
6,124

 
$
(1,642
)
 
$
9,445

 
$
72

 
$
(4,235
)
 
$
5,282

 
$
2,496

 
$
(1,611
)
 
$
6,167







110
Exhibit 3.1

AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
PNK ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
(originally incorporated on July 23, 2015 under the name
PNK Holdings, Inc.)
ARTICLE I
The name of the corporation is: PNK Entertainment, Inc.
ARTICLE II
The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle 19801. The name of its registered agent is The Corporation Trust Company.
ARTICLE III
The nature of the business to be conducted or promoted is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
ARTICLE IV
The amount of the total authorized capital stock of the corporation is 150,250,000 shares which are divided into two classes as follows:
250,000 shares of Preferred Stock having a par value of $0.01 per share; and
150,000,000 shares of Common Stock having a par value of $0.01 per share.
The designations, voting powers, preferences and relative participating, optional or other special rights, and qualifications, limitations or restrictions of the above classes of stock are as follows:
A.  Preferred Stock .
The Board of Directors is authorized, subject to any limitations prescribed by law, to provide for the issuance of shares of Preferred Stock in series, and by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the State of Delaware (such certificate being hereinafter referred to as a “Preferred Stock Designation”), to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences, and rights of the shares of each such series and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. The number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of all of the then-outstanding shares of capital stock of the corporation entitled to vote thereon, without a vote of the holders of the Preferred Stock, or of any series thereof, unless a vote of any such holders is required pursuant to the terms of any Preferred Stock Designation.
B.  Common Stock .
(i) Subject to the preferential rights of the Preferred Stock, the holders of the Common Stock shall be entitled to receive, to the extent permitted by law, such dividends as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors.
(ii) Each outstanding share of Common Stock shall entitle the holder thereof to one vote on each matter properly submitted to the stockholders of the corporation for their vote;  provided however , that, except as otherwise required by law, holders of Common Stock shall not be entitled to vote on any amendment to this Certificate of Incorporation (including any Preferred Stock Designation relating to any series of Preferred Stock) that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding



series of Preferred Stock if the holders of such affected series are entitled, either separately or together as a class with the holders of one or more other such series, to vote thereon pursuant to this Certificate of Incorporation (including any Preferred Stock Designation relating to any series of Preferred Stock).
ARTICLE V
To the fullest extent permitted by law, any and all right, title, interest and claim in or to any dividends declared by the corporation, whether in cash, stock, or otherwise, which are unclaimed by the stockholder entitled thereto for a period of six years after the close of business on the payment date, shall be and is deemed to be extinguished and abandoned; and such unclaimed dividends in the possession of the corporation, its transfer agents or other agents or depositories shall at such time become the absolute property of the corporation, free and clear of any and all claims of any persons whatsoever.
ARTICLE VI
In furtherance and not in limitation of the power conferred by statute, the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to make, alter, amend or repeal the by-laws of the corporation. Notwithstanding any provision of the by-laws of the corporation or any provision of law which might otherwise permit a lesser vote or no vote, but in addition to any affirmative vote of the holders of any particular class or series of the capital stock of the corporation required by law or the by-laws of the corporation, the by-laws of the corporation may also be amended, repealed or adopted by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the capital stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class.
 
ARTICLE VII
Whenever a compromise or arrangement is proposed between this corporation and its creditors or any class of them and/or between this corporation and its stockholders or any class of them, any court of equitable jurisdiction within the State of Delaware may, on the application in a summary way of this corporation or of any creditor or stockholder thereof or on the application of any receiver or receivers appointed for this corporation under § 291 of Title 8 of the Delaware Code or on the application of trustees in dissolution or of any receiver or receivers appointed for this corporation under § 279 of Title 8 of the Delaware Code order a meeting of the creditors or class of creditors, and/or of the stockholders or class of stockholders of this corporation, as the case may be, to be summoned in such manner as the said court directs. If a majority in number representing three fourths in value of the creditors or class of creditors, and/or of the stockholders or class of stockholders of this corporation, as the case may be, agree to any compromise or arrangement and to any reorganization of this corporation as consequence of such compromise or arrangement, the said compromise or arrangement and the said reorganization shall, if sanctioned by the court to which the said application has been made, be binding on all the creditors or class of creditors, and/or on all the stockholders or class of stockholders, of this corporation, as the case may be, and also on this corporation.
ARTICLE VIII
The corporation shall indemnify its officers and directors to the full extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law.
ARTICLE IX
Elections of directors need not be by written ballot unless the by-laws of the corporation so provide.
ARTICLE X
The corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision contained in this Certificate of Incorporation, in the manner now or hereafter prescribed by statute, and all rights conferred upon stockholders herein are granted subject to this reservation.



ARTICLE XI
The business and affairs of the corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of the board of directors. In addition to the powers and authority expressly conferred upon them by statute or by this Certificate of Incorporation or the by-laws of the corporation, the directors are hereby empowered to exercise all such powers and do all such acts and things as may be exercised or done by the corporation.
ARTICLE XII
No director of the corporation shall be personally liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty by such director for corporate actions as a director;  provided however , that this Article XII shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a director to the extent provided by applicable law (1) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (2) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (3) under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or (4) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. No amendment to repeal this Article XII shall apply to, or have any effect on the liability or alleged liability of any director of the corporation for or with respect to any acts or omissions of such director occurring prior to such amendment or repeal.
ARTICLE XIII
A.  Definitions . For purposes of this Article XIII, the following terms shall have the meanings specified below:
1. “Affiliate” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Rule 12b-2 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
2. “Affiliated Companies” shall mean those entities directly or indirectly affiliated or under common Ownership or Control with the corporation, including, without limitation, subsidiaries, holding companies and intermediary companies (as those and similar terms are defined in the Gaming Laws of the applicable Gaming Jurisdictions) that are registered or licensed under applicable Gaming Laws.
3. “Gaming” or “Gaming Activities” shall mean the conduct of gaming and gambling activities, or the use of gaming devices, equipment and supplies in the operation of a casino, card club or other enterprise, including, without limitation, slot machines, gaming tables, cards, dice, gaming chips, player tracking systems, cashless wagering systems and related and associated equipment and supplies.
4. “Gaming Authorities” shall mean all international, foreign, federal, state and local regulatory and licensing bodies and agencies with authority over Gaming within any Gaming Jurisdiction.
5. “Gaming Jurisdictions” shall mean all jurisdictions, domestic and foreign, and their political subdivisions, in which Gaming Activities are lawfully conducted.
6. “Gaming Laws” shall mean all laws, statutes and ordinances pursuant to which any Gaming Authority possesses regulatory and licensing authority over Gaming within any Gaming Jurisdiction, and all rules and regulations promulgated by such Gaming Authority thereunder.
7. “Gaming Licenses” shall mean all licenses, permits, approvals, authorizations, registrations, findings of suitability, franchises and entitlements issued by a Gaming Authority necessary for or relating to the conduct of Gaming Activities.
8. “Ownership or Control” (and derivatives thereof) shall mean (i) ownership of record, (ii) “beneficial ownership” as defined in Rule 13d-3 or Rule 16a-1(a)(2) promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act, (iii) the power to direct and manage, directly or indirectly, by agreement, contract, agency or other manner, the voting or management rights or disposition of securities of the corporation, and/or (iv) definitions of ownership or control under applicable Gaming Laws.
9. “Person” shall mean an individual, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, trust or any other entity.
10. “Redemption Date” shall mean the date specified in the Redemption Notice as the date on which the securities Owned or Controlled by an Unsuitable Person are to be redeemed by the corporation.
11. “Redemption Notice” shall mean that notice of redemption served by the corporation on an Unsuitable Person or Affiliate of an Unsuitable Person pursuant to this Article XIII. Each Redemption Notice shall set forth (i) the Redemption Date; (ii) the number of shares of securities to be redeemed; (iii) the Redemption Price and the manner of payment therefor;



(iv) the place where certificates for such shares shall be surrendered for payment; and (v) any other requirements of surrender of the certificates, including how they are to be endorsed, if at all.
12. “Redemption Price” shall mean the per share price for the redemption of any securities to be redeemed pursuant to this Article XIII, which shall be that price (if any) required to be paid by the Gaming Authority making the finding of unsuitability, or if such Gaming Authority does not require a certain price per share to be paid, that sum deemed reasonable by the corporation (which may include, in the corporation’s discretion, the original purchase price per share of the securities);  provided however , the Redemption Price, unless the Gaming Authority requires otherwise, shall in no event exceed (i) the closing sales price of the securities on the principal national securities exchange on which such shares are then listed on the trading date on the day before the Redemption Notice is deemed given to the Unsuitable Person by the corporation, or (ii) if such shares are not then listed for trading on any national securities exchange, then the closing sales price of such shares as quoted in the NASDAQ National Market System, or (iii) if the shares are not then so quoted, then the mean between the representative bid and the ask price as quoted by NASDAQ or another generally recognized reporting system. The Redemption Price may be paid in cash, by promissory note, or both, as required by the applicable Gaming Authority and, if not so required, as the corporation elects. Any promissory note shall contain such terms and conditions as the Board of Directors determines necessary or advisable, including without limitation, subordination provisions, to comply with any law or regulation then applicable to the corporation or any Affiliate of the corporation or to prevent a default or event of default under, breach of, or acceleration of, any loan, promissory note, mortgage, indenture, line of credit, or other debt or financing agreement of the corporation or any Affiliate of the corporation. Subject to the foregoing, the principal amount of the promissory note together with any unpaid interest shall be due and payable no later than the tenth anniversary of delivery of the note and interest on the unpaid principal thereof shall be payable annually in arrears at the rate of 2% per annum.
13. “Unsuitable Person” shall mean a Person who Owns or Controls any securities of the corporation or any securities of or interest in any Affiliated Company (i) that is determined by a Gaming Authority to be unsuitable to Own or Control such securities or unsuitable to be connected with a Person engaged in Gaming Activities in that Gaming Jurisdiction, or (ii) who causes the corporation or any Affiliated Company to lose or to be threatened with the loss of, or who, in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors of the corporation, is deemed likely to jeopardize the corporation’s right to the use of or entitlement to, any Gaming License.
B.  Compliance with Gaming Laws . The corporation, all Persons Owning or Controlling securities of the corporation and any Affiliated Companies, and each director and officer of the corporation and any Affiliated Companies shall comply with all requirements of the Gaming Laws in each Gaming Jurisdiction in which the corporation or any Affiliated Companies conduct Gaming Activities. All securities of the corporation shall be held subject to the requirements of such Gaming Laws, including any requirement that (i) the holder file applications for Gaming Licenses with, or provide information to, applicable Gaming Authorities, or (ii) that any transfer of such securities may be subject to prior approval by Gaming Authorities, and any transfer of securities of the corporation in violation of any such approval requirement shall not be permitted and the purported transfer shall be void ab initio.
C.  Finding of Unsuitability .
1. The securities of the corporation Owned or Controlled by an Unsuitable Person or an Affiliate of an Unsuitable Person shall be redeemable by the corporation, out of funds legally available therefor, by action of the Board of Directors, to the extent required by the Gaming Authority making the determination of unsuitability or to the extent deemed necessary or advisable by the corporation. If a Gaming Authority requires the corporation, or the corporation deems it necessary or advisable, to redeem such securities, the corporation shall serve a Redemption Notice on the Unsuitable Person or its Affiliate and shall purchase the securities on the Redemption Date and for the Redemption Price set forth in the Redemption Notice. From and after the Redemption Date, such securities shall no longer be deemed to be outstanding and all rights of the Unsuitable Person or any Affiliate of the Unsuitable Person therein, other than the right to receive the Redemption Price, shall cease. The Unsuitable Person shall surrender the certificates for any securities to be redeemed in accordance with the requirements of the Redemption Notice.
2. Commencing on the date that a Gaming Authority serves notice of a determination of unsuitability or the loss or threatened loss of a Gaming License upon the corporation, or on the date that the Board of Directors determines that a Person is an Unsuitable Person, and until the securities Owned or Controlled by such Person are Owned or Controlled by a Person who is not an Unsuitable Person, it shall be unlawful for the Unsuitable Person or any Affiliate of an Unsuitable Person (i) to receive any dividend, payment, distribution or interest with regard to the securities; (ii) to exercise, directly or indirectly or through any proxy, trustee, or nominee, any voting or other right conferred by such securities, and such securities shall not for any purposes be included in the securities of the corporation entitled to vote, or (iii) to receive any remuneration in any form from the corporation or an Affiliated Company for services rendered or otherwise.



D.  Issuance and Transfer of Securities . The corporation shall not issue or cause the transfer of any securities or any interest, claim or charge thereon or thereto except in accordance with applicable Gaming Laws. The issuance or transfer of any securities in violation thereof shall be ineffective until (i) the corporation shall cease to be subject to the jurisdiction of the applicable Gaming Authorities, or (ii) the applicable Gaming Authorities shall, by affirmative action, validate said issuance or transfer or waive any defect in said issuance or transfer.
E.  Indenture Restrictions . The corporation shall cause to be placed in every indenture or other operative document relating to publicly traded securities (other than capital stock) of the corporation a provision requiring that any Person or Affiliate of a Person who holds the indebtedness represented by that indenture and is found to be an Unsuitable Person shall have the interest redeemed or shall dispose of the interest in the corporation in the manner set forth in the indenture or other document.
F.  Notices . All notices given by the corporation pursuant to this Article XIII, including Redemption Notices, shall be in writing and may be given by mail, addressed to the Person at such Person’s address as it appears on the records of the corporation, with postage thereon prepaid, and such notice shall be deemed given at the time deposited in the United States mail. Written notice may also be given personally or by telegram, facsimile or electronic transmission and such notice shall be deemed to be given at the time of receipt thereof, if given personally, or at the time of transmission thereof, if given by telegram, facsimile or electronic transmission.
G.  Indemnification . Any Unsuitable Person and any Affiliate of an Unsuitable Person shall indemnify the corporation and its Affiliated Companies for any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by the corporation and its Affiliated Companies as a result of such Unsuitable Person’s or Affiliate’s continuing Ownership or Control or failure to promptly divest itself of any securities in the corporation.
H.  Fiduciary Obligations; Contractual Arrangements; Etc . Nothing contained in this Article XIII shall be construed (i) to relieve any Unsuitable Person (or Affiliate of such Person) from any fiduciary obligation imposed by law, (ii) to prohibit or affect any contractual arrangement which the corporation may make from time to time with any holder of securities of the corporation to purchase all or any part of shares of capital stock or other securities held by them, or (iii) to be in derogation of any action, past or future, which has been or may be taken by the Board of Directors.
I.  Injunctive Relief . The corporation is entitled to injunctive relief in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this Article XIII and each holder of the securities of the corporation shall be deemed to have acknowledged, by acquiring the securities of the corporation, that the failure to comply with this Article XIII will expose the corporation to irreparable injury for which there is no adequate remedy at law and that the corporation is entitled to injunctive relief to enforce the provisions of this Article XIII.
J.  Legend . The restrictions set forth in this Article XIII shall be noted conspicuously on any certificate representing securities of the corporation in accordance with the requirements of the Delaware General Corporation Law and applicable Gaming Laws.
 
K.  Non-exclusivity of Rights . The corporation’s rights of redemption provided in this Article XIII shall not be exclusive of any other rights the corporation may have or hereafter acquire under any agreement, provision of the by-laws or otherwise.
L.  Further Actions . Nothing contained in this Article XIII shall limit the authority of the Board of Directors to take such other action to the extent permitted by law as it deems necessary or advisable to protect the corporation or its Affiliated Companies from the denial or threatened denial or loss or threatened loss of any Gaming License of the corporation or any of its Affiliated Companies. In addition, the Board of Directors may, to the extent permitted by law, from time to time establish, modify, amend or rescind by-laws, regulations, and procedures of the corporation not inconsistent with the express provisions of this Article XIII for the purpose of determining whether any Person is an Unsuitable Person and for the orderly application, administration and implementation of the provisions of this Article XIII. Such procedures and regulations shall be kept on file with the corporation and shall be made available for inspection by the public upon request. The Board of Directors (or a committee thereof) shall have exclusive authority and power to administer this Article XIII and to exercise all rights and powers specifically granted to the Board of Directors or the corporation, or as may be necessary or advisable in the administration of this Article XIII. All such actions which are done or made by the Board of Directors in good faith shall be final, conclusive and binding on the corporation and all other Persons.
M.  Severability . If any provision of this Article XIII or the application of any such provision to any Person or under any circumstance shall be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision of this Article XIII.



N.  Termination and Waivers . Except as may be required by any applicable Gaming Law or Gaming Authority, the Board of Directors may waive any of the rights of the corporation or any restrictions contained in this Article XIII in any instance in which the Board of Directors determines that a waiver would be in the best interests of the corporation. The Board of Directors may terminate any rights of the corporation or restrictions set forth in this Article XIII to the extent that the Board of Directors determines that any such termination is in the best interests of the corporation. Except as may be required by a Gaming Authority, nothing in this Article XIII shall be deemed or construed to require the corporation to repurchase or redeem any securities Owned or Controlled by an Unsuitable Person or an Affiliate of an Unsuitable Person.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, which restates and integrates and further amends the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation, and which has been duly adopted in accordance with Sections 242 and 245 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, has been duly executed by the undersigned officer of the corporation this 18th day of April, 2016.
 
PNK ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Carlos A. Ruisanchez
 
 
Name:  Carlos A. Ruisanchez
 
 
Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer




CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
PNK ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
PNK Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify that:
FIRST : Article I of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
The name of the corporation is: Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.
SECOND : This amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
THIRD : This amendment shall be effective on April 28, 2016, as of 4:02 pm Eastern Time.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized officer, this 28 day of April, 2016.
 
PNK ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Carlos A. Ruisanchez
 
 
Name:
 
Carlos A. Ruisanchez
 
 
Title:
 
President and Chief Financial Officer


Exhibit 4.23

PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
EXECUTIVE AND TEAM MEMBER OTHER STOCK UNIT AWARD
GRANT NOTICE AND AGREEMENT
(2016 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan)

Congratulations! I am pleased to inform you that, in recognition of the role you play in the collective success of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company” or “Pinnacle”), you have been granted an Other Stock Unit Award. This award is subject to the terms and conditions of the 2016 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), this Grant Notice, and the following Other Stock Unit Award Agreement. The details of this award are indicated below.

Grantee:
 
Date of Grant:
 
Covered Shares of Common Stock:
 
Vesting Commencement Date:
 
Time Vested Units:
 
Time Vesting Period:
 
Performance Vested Units:
 
Performance Vesting Period:
 
Performance Vesting Criteria:
 
Delivery Date:
 

Other Stock Unit Awards can be a great opportunity for individual wealth creation. As our Company becomes more valuable through management running the business better and through growth opportunities, the value or price of a share of the Company’s common stock should increase. Through your efforts and the efforts of your colleagues, you have the ability to help increase the value of our Company for all shareholders.

Thank you for all you do each and every day as a leader and owner of the Company. Our focus on driving profitable revenues, eliminating non-value added expense and investing our capital prudently is collectively building a much stronger Pinnacle. We are establishing a balanced portfolio of properties as we continue to grow nationally and internationally, and are well on our way to becoming the BEST CASINO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY IN THE WORLD.

It is an exciting time to be part of Pinnacle Entertainment!

Anthony Sanfilippo
Chief Executive Officer



OTHER STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
THIS OTHER STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT (together with the above grant notice (the “Grant Notice” ), this “Agreement” ) is made and entered into as of the date set forth on the Grant Notice by and between the Company, and the individual (the “Grantee” ) set forth on the Grant Notice.
A.    Pursuant to the Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. 2016 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the “Plan” ), the Compensation Committee (the “Committee” ) has determined that it is to the advantage and best interest of the Company to grant to the Grantee this award of Time-Vested Other Stock Unit Awards (the “ Time-Vested Units ”) and Performance-Vested Other Stock Unit Awards (the “ Performance-Vested Units ” and together with the Time-Vested Units, the “ Other Stock Units ”) covering the number of shares of the Common Stock of the Company (the “Shares” ) set forth on the Grant Notice and in all respects subject to the terms, definitions and provisions of the Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference, and this Agreement (the “Award” ).
B.    Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements contained herein, the Grantee and the Company hereby agree as follows:
1. Acceptance of Agreement . Grantee has reviewed all of the provisions of the Plan, the Grant Notice, and this Other Stock Unit Award Agreement. By electronically accepting this Award according to the instructions provided by the Company’s designated broker, Grantee agrees that this electronic contract contains Grantee’s electronic signature, which Grantee has executed with the intent to sign this Agreement, and that this Award is granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Grant Notice, this Other Stock Unit Award Agreement, and the applicable provisions (if any) contained in a written employment agreement between the Company or an Affiliate and the Grantee. Grantee hereby agrees to accept as binding, conclusive and final all decisions or interpretations of the Committee on questions relating to the Plan, the Grant Notice, this Other Stock Unit Award Agreement and, solely in so far as they relate to this Award, the applicable provisions (if any) contained in a written employment agreement between the Company or an Affiliate and the Grantee.

2. Grant of Award . The Other Stock Units granted hereunder pursuant to Article VIII of the Plan shall be subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, and all capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Plan. For purposes of this Agreement, “ Termination Date ” shall mean the date on which the Grantee’s Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant terminates. The Other Stock Units shall not be entitled to Dividend Equivalents under Section 13.5 of the Plan but shall be subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 13.2 of the Plan.

3. Vesting .

3.1.    Subject to the provisions of the Plan and Sections 3.2 and 3.3 of this Agreement, and except as otherwise provided in a written employment agreement between the Company or an Affiliate and the Grantee:

3.1.1.     Time-Vested Units . Time-Vested Units shall vest in equal annual installments on each anniversary of the Vesting Commencement Date during the Time Vesting Period (each such date, a “Time Vesting Date” ), subject to the Grantee’s Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant through each applicable Time Vesting Date.

3.1.2.     Performance-Vested Units . Performance-Vested Units shall vest based on achievement of the Performance Vesting Criteria, as described in the Grant Notice, during the Performance Period (the last date of the Performance Vesting Period, unless such other date or dates is indicated in the Performance Vesting Criteria, a “Performance Vesting Date” and together with Time-Vesting Date, the “Vesting Dates” ), subject to the Grantee’s Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant through each applicable Performance Vesting Date.




3.2.    If the Grantee’s Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant terminates prior to an applicable Vesting Date, as of the Termination Date, the Grantee shall forfeit any unvested Other Stock Units.

3.3.    If the Grantee’s Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant is terminated for Cause prior to the transfer of the Shares to the Grantee as provided in Section 4, any Other Stock Units for which Shares have not been transferred as of the Termination Date shall not vest and shall be forfeited in full by the Grantee.

4. Settlement and Transfer of Shares . This Award (to the extent vested) shall be settled by the Company by the issuance and delivery of Shares as soon as reasonably practical after (but no later than 60 days after) the Delivery Date, as indicated in the Grant Notice, to the Grantee (or if applicable, the Beneficiaries of the Grantee). Any issuance of Shares shall be made only in whole Shares, and any fractional shares shall be distributed in an equivalent cash amount.

5. General.

5.1.     Governing Law . This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of Delaware applicable to agreements made and to be performed entirely in Delaware, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions of Delaware or any other jurisdiction.

5.2.     Community Property . Without prejudice to the actual rights of the spouses as between each other, for all purposes of this Agreement, the Grantee shall be treated as agent and attorney-in-fact for that interest held or claimed by his or her spouse with respect to this Award and the parties hereto shall act in all matters as if the Grantee was the sole owner of this Award. This appointment is coupled with an interest and is irrevocable.

5.3.     No Employment Rights . Nothing contained herein shall be construed as an agreement by the Company or any of its subsidiaries, express or implied, to employ the Grantee or contract for the Grantee’s services, to restrict the Company’s or such subsidiary’s right to discharge the Grantee or cease contracting for the Grantee’s services or to modify, extend or otherwise affect in any manner whatsoever the terms of any employment agreement or contract for services which may exist between the Grantee and the Company or any Affiliate.

5.4.     Application to Other Stock . In the event any capital stock of the Company or any other corporation shall be distributed on, with respect to, or in exchange for Shares as a stock dividend, stock split, reclassification or recapitalization in connection with any merger or reorganization or otherwise, all restrictions, rights and obligations set forth in this Agreement shall apply with respect to such other capital stock to the same extent as they are, or would have been applicable, to the Shares on or with respect to which such other capital stock was distributed, and references to “Company” in respect of such distributed stock shall be deemed to refer to the company to which such distributed stock relates.

5.5.     No Third-Party Benefits . Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, none of the provisions of this Agreement shall be for the benefit of, or enforceable by, any third-party beneficiary.

5.6.     Successors and Assigns . Except as provided herein to the contrary, this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors and permitted assigns.

5.7.     No Assignment . Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the Grantee may not assign any of his, her or its rights under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Company, which consent may be withheld in its sole discretion. The Company shall be permitted to assign its rights or obligations under this Agreement so long as such assignee agrees to perform all of the Company’s obligations hereunder.

5.8.     Severability . The validity, legality or enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected even if one or more of the provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect.




5.9.     Equitable Relief . The Grantee acknowledges that, in the event of a threatened or actual breach of any of the provisions of this Agreement, damages alone will be an inadequate remedy, and such breach will cause the Company great, immediate and irreparable injury and damage. Accordingly, the Grantee agrees that the Company shall be entitled to injunctive and other equitable relief, and that such relief shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any remedies it may have at law or under this Agreement.

5.10.     Arbitration .

5.10.1.     General . Any controversy, dispute, or claim between the parties to this Agreement, including any claim arising out of, in connection with, or in relation to the formation, interpretation, performance or breach of this Agreement shall be settled exclusively by arbitration, before a single arbitrator, in accordance with this Section 5.10 and the then most applicable rules of the American Arbitration Association. Judgment upon any award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered by any state or federal court having jurisdiction thereof. Such arbitration shall be administered by the American Arbitration Association. Arbitration shall be the exclusive remedy for determining any such dispute, regardless of its nature. Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may in an appropriate matter apply to a court for provisional relief, including a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction, on the ground that the award to which the applicant may be entitled in arbitration may be rendered ineffectual without provisional relief. Unless mutually agreed by the parties otherwise, any arbitration shall take place in the City of Las Vegas, Nevada.

5.10.2.     Selection of Arbitrator . In the event the parties are unable to agree upon an arbitrator, the parties shall select a single arbitrator from a list of nine arbitrators drawn by the parties at random from the “Independent” (or “Gold Card”) list of retired judges or, at the option of the Grantee, from a list of nine persons (which shall be retired judges or corporate or litigation attorneys experienced in stock incentives and buy-sell agreements) provided by the office of the American Arbitration Association having jurisdiction over Las Vegas, Nevada. If the parties are unable to agree upon an arbitrator from the list so drawn, then the parties shall each strike names alternately from the list, with the first to strike being determined by lot. After each party has used four strikes, the remaining name on the list shall be the arbitrator. If such person is unable to serve for any reason, the parties shall repeat this process until an arbitrator is selected.

5.10.3.     Applicability of Arbitration; Remedial Authority . This agreement to resolve any disputes by binding arbitration shall extend to claims against any parent, subsidiary or affiliate of each party, and, when acting within such capacity, any officer, director, stockholder, employee or agent of each party, or of any of the above, and shall apply as well to claims arising out of state and federal statutes and local ordinances as well as to claims arising under the common law. In the event of a dispute subject to this paragraph the parties shall be entitled to reasonable discovery subject to the discretion of the arbitrator. The remedial authority of the arbitrator (which shall include the right to grant injunctive or other equitable relief) shall be the same as, but no greater than, would be the remedial power of a court having jurisdiction over the parties and their dispute. The arbitrator shall, upon an appropriate motion, dismiss any claim without an evidentiary hearing if the party bringing the motion establishes that he or it would be entitled to summary judgment if the matter had been pursued in court litigation. In the event of a conflict between the applicable rules of the American Arbitration Association and these procedures, the provisions of these procedures shall govern.

5.10.4.     Fees and Costs . Any filing or administrative fees shall be borne initially by the party requesting arbitration. The Company shall be responsible for the costs and fees of the arbitration, unless the Grantee wishes to contribute (up to 50%) of the costs and fees of the arbitration. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the prevailing party in such arbitration, as determined by the arbitrator, and in any enforcement or other court proceedings, shall be entitled, to the extent permitted by law, to reimbursement from the other party for all of the prevailing party’s costs (including but not limited to the arbitrator’s compensation), expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

5.10.5.     Award Final and Binding . The arbitrator shall render an award and written opinion, and the award shall be final and binding upon the parties. If any of the provisions of this paragraph, or of this Agreement, are determined to be unlawful or otherwise unenforceable, in whole or in part, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be reformed to the extent



necessary to carry out its provisions to the greatest extent possible and to insure that the resolution of all conflicts between the parties, including those arising out of statutory claims, shall be resolved by neutral, binding arbitration. If a court should find that the arbitration provisions of this Agreement are not absolutely binding, then the parties intend any arbitration decision and award to be fully admissible in evidence in any subsequent action, given great weight by any finder of fact, and treated as determinative to the maximum extent permitted by law.
 
5.11.     Section 409A Compliance . The intent of the parties is that payments and benefits under this Agreement comply with Section 409A of Code to the extent subject thereto, and, accordingly, to the maximum extent permitted, this Agreement shall be interpreted and be administered to be in compliance therewith.  Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, to the extent required to avoid accelerated taxation and/or tax penalties under Section 409A of the Code, the Grantee shall not be considered to have separated from service with the Company for purposes of this Agreement and no payment shall be due to the Grantee under this Agreement on account of a separation from service until the Grantee would be considered to have incurred a “separation from service” from the Company within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code.  Any payments described in this Agreement that are due within the “short-term deferral period” as defined in Section 409A of the Code shall not be treated as deferred compensation unless applicable law requires otherwise.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, to the extent that any amounts are payable upon a separation from service and such payment would result in accelerated taxation and/or tax penalties under Section 409A of the Code, such payment, under this Agreement or any other agreement of the Company, shall be made on the first business day after the date that is six (6) months following such separation from service (or death, if earlier). The Company makes no representation that any or all of the payments described in this Agreement will be exempt from or comply with Section 409A of the Code and makes no undertaking to preclude Section 409A of the Code from applying to any such payment. The Grantee shall be solely responsible for the payment of any taxes and penalties incurred under Section 409A.

5.12.     Withholding Taxes . The Company shall be entitled to require a cash payment by or on behalf of the Grantee and/or to deduct from the Shares or cash otherwise issuable hereunder or other compensation payable to the Grantee the minimum amount of any sums required by federal, state or local tax law to be withheld (or other such sums that that will not cause adverse accounting consequences for the Company and is permitted under applicable withholding rules promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service or another applicable governmental entity) with respect to the Other Stock Units.

5.13.     Headings . The section headings in this Agreement are inserted only as a matter of convenience, and in no way define, limit, extend or interpret the scope of this Agreement or of any particular section.

5.14.     Number and Gender . Throughout this Agreement, as the context may require, (a) the masculine gender includes the feminine and the neuter gender includes the masculine and the feminine; (b) the singular tense and number includes the plural, and the plural tense and number includes the singular; (c) the past tense includes the present, and the present tense includes the past; (d) references to parties, sections, paragraphs and exhibits mean the parties, sections, paragraphs and exhibits of and to this Agreement; and (e) periods of days, weeks or months mean calendar days, weeks or months.

5.15.     Electronic Delivery and Disclosure . The Company may, in its sole discretion, decide to deliver or disclose, as applicable, any documents related to this Award granted under the Plan, future awards that may be granted under the Plan, the prospectus related to the Plan, the Company’s annual reports or proxy statements by electronic means or to request Grantee’s consent to participate in the Plan by electronic means. Grantee hereby consents to receive such documents delivered electronically or to retrieve such documents furnished electronically, as applicable, and agrees to participate in the Plan through any online or electronic system established and maintained by the Company or another third party designated by the Company.

5.16.     Data Privacy . Grantee agrees that all of Grantee’s information that is described or referenced in this Agreement and the Plan may be used by the Company, its affiliates and the designated broker and its affiliates to administer and manage Grantee’s participation in the Plan.




5.17.     Acknowledgments of Grantee . Grantee has reviewed the Plan and this Agreement in their entirety, has had an opportunity to obtain the advice of counsel prior to executing this Agreement, fully understands all provisions of the Plan and this Agreement and, by accepting the Notice of Grant, acknowledges and agrees to all of the provisions of the Plan and this Agreement.

5.18.     Complete Agreement . The Grant Notice, this Other Stock Unit Award Agreement, the Plan, and applicable provisions (if any) contained in a written employment agreement between the Company or an Affiliate and the Grantee constitute the parties’ entire agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all agreements, representations, warranties, statements, promises and understandings, whether oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof.

5.19.     Waiver of Jury Trial . TO THE EXTENT EITHER PARTY INITIATES LITIGATION INVOLVING THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY ASPECT OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN US (EVEN IF OTHER PARTIES OR OTHER CLAIMS ARE INCLUDED IN SUCH LITIGATION), ALL OF THE PARTIES WAIVE THEIR RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY. THIS WAIVER WILL APPLY TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION THAT ARE OR MIGHT BE INCLUDED IN SUCH ACTION, INCLUDING CLAIMS RELATED TO THE ENFORCEMENT OR INTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT, ALLEGATIONS OF STATE OR FEDERAL STATUTORY VIOLATIONS, FRAUD, MISREPRESENTATION, OR SIMILAR CAUSES OF ACTION, AND IN CONNECTION WITH ANY LEGAL ACTION INITIATED FOR THE RECOVERY OF DAMAGES BETWEEN OR AMONG US OR BETWEEN OR AMONG ANY OF OUR OWNERS, AFFILIATES, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS.

5.20.     Merger with Penn National Gaming . Reference is made to the Merger Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2017, by and among Pinnacle, Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Franchise Merger Sub, Inc. (the “Merger Agreement”). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan or in any employment agreement between the Grantee and Pinnacle or one of its Affiliates, upon and following the occurrence of the Effective Time, as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement, this Award shall be treated in accordance with Section 2.4(c) of the Merger Agreement.

Exhibit 4.24

PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
EXECUTIVE AND TEAM MEMBER RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD
GRANT NOTICE AND AGREEMENT
(2016 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan)

Congratulations! I am pleased to inform you that, in recognition of the role you play in the collective success of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. (the “ Company ” or “ Pinnacle ”), you have been granted a Restricted Stock Award. This award is subject to the terms and conditions of the 2016 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the “ Plan ”), this Grant Notice, and the following Restricted Stock Award Agreement. The details of this award are indicated below.

Grantee:
 
Date of Grant:
 
Covered Shares of Restricted Stock:
 
Vesting Commencement Date:
 
Time Vested Stock:
 
Time Vesting Period:
 
Performance Vested Stock:
 
Performance Vesting Period:
 
Performance Vesting Criteria:
 
Delivery Date:
 

Restricted Stock Awards can be a great opportunity for individual wealth creation. As our Company becomes more valuable through management running the business better and through growth opportunities, the value or price of a share of the Company’s common stock should increase. Through your efforts and the efforts of your colleagues, you have the ability to help increase the value of our Company for all shareholders.

Thank you for all you do each and every day as a leader and owner of the Company. Our focus on driving profitable revenues, eliminating non-value added expense and investing our capital prudently is collectively building a much stronger Pinnacle. We are establishing a balanced portfolio of properties as we continue to grow nationally and internationally, and are well on our way to becoming the BEST CASINO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY IN THE WORLD.

It is an exciting time to be part of Pinnacle Entertainment!

Anthony Sanfilippo
Chief Executive Officer



RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
THIS RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT (together with the above grant notice (the “ Grant Notice ”), this “ Agreement ”) is made and entered into as of the date set forth on the Grant Notice by and between the Company, and the individual (the “ Grantee ”) set forth on the Grant Notice.
A.    Pursuant to the Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. 2016 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the “ Plan ”), the Compensation Committee (the “ Committee ”) has determined that it is to the advantage and best interest of the Company to grant to the Grantee this award of time-vested Restricted Stock (the “ Time-Vested Stock ”) and performance-vested Restricted Stock (the “ Performance-Vested Stock ” and together with the Time-Vested Stock, the “ Restricted Stock ”) as set forth on the Grant Notice and in all respects subject to the terms, definitions and provisions of the Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference, and this Agreement (the “ Award ”).
B.    Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements contained herein, the Grantee and the Company hereby agree as follows:
1. Acceptance of Agreement . Grantee has reviewed all of the provisions of the Plan, the Grant Notice, and this Restricted Stock Award Agreement. By electronically accepting this Award according to the instructions provided by the Company’s designated broker, Grantee agrees that this electronic contract contains Grantee’s electronic signature, which Grantee has executed with the intent to sign this Agreement, and that this Award is granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Grant Notice, this Restricted Stock Award Agreement, and the applicable provisions (if any) contained in a written employment agreement between the Company or an Affiliate and the Grantee. Grantee hereby agrees to accept as binding, conclusive and final all decisions or interpretations of the Committee on questions relating to the Plan, the Grant Notice, this Restricted Stock Award Agreement and, solely in so far as they relate to this Award, the applicable provisions (if any) contained in a written employment agreement between the Company or an Affiliate and the Grantee.

2. Grant of Award . The Restricted Stock granted hereunder pursuant to Article VII of the Plan shall be subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, and all capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Plan. For purposes of this Agreement, “Termination Date” shall mean the date on which the Grantee’s Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant terminates. Subject to Section 5.13 of this Agreement, the Grantee shall be entitled to receive dividends with respect to the Restricted Stock.

3. Vesting .

3.1.    Subject to the provisions of the Plan and Sections 3.2 and 3.3 of this Agreement, and except as otherwise provided in a written employment agreement between the Company or an Affiliate and the Grantee:

3.1.1.     Time-Vested Stock . Time-Vested Stock shall vest in equal annual installments on each anniversary of the Vesting Commencement Date during the Time Vesting Period (each such date, a “ Time Vesting Date ”), subject to the Grantee’s Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant through each applicable Time Vesting Date.

3.1.2.     Performance-Vested Stock . Performance-Vested Stock shall vest based on achievement of the Performance Vesting Criteria, as described in the Grant Notice, during the Performance Vesting Period (the last date of the Performance Vesting Period, unless such other date or dates is indicated in the Performance Vesting Criteria, a “ Performance Vesting Date ” and together with Time-Vesting Date, the “ Vesting Dates ”), subject to the Grantee’s Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant through each applicable Performance Vesting Date. If any Performance Vested Stock does not vest on the applicable Performance Vesting Date, such Performance Vested Stock shall be forfeited on such Performance Vesting Date.




3.2    If the Grantee’s Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant terminates prior to an applicable Vesting Date, as of the Termination Date, the Grantee shall forfeit any unvested Restricted Stock.

4. Transfer of Stock . The Restricted Stock issued under this Agreement may not be sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of and may not be pledged or otherwise hypothecated (each, a “ Transfer ”) until such Restricted Stock vests, and all restrictions on such Restricted Stock shall have lapsed, in the manner set forth in Section 3. Until the Restricted Stock vests, such Restricted Stock shall (i) if in book entry form, be subject to an appropriate stop-transfer order and (ii) to the extent that a stock certificate is delivered to the Grantee, bear the following legend or notation: “The Stock represented by this certificate are subject to a Restricted Stock Award Agreement between the registered owner and Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. which restricts the transferability of the Stock. A copy of the agreement is on file with the Secretary of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.”

5. General.

5.1.     Governing Law . This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of Delaware applicable to agreements made and to be performed entirely in Delaware, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions of Delaware or any other jurisdiction.

5.2.     Community Property . Without prejudice to the actual rights of the spouses as between each other, for all purposes of this Agreement, the Grantee shall be treated as agent and attorney-in-fact for that interest held or claimed by his or her spouse with respect to this Award and the parties hereto shall act in all matters as if the Grantee was the sole owner of this Award. This appointment is coupled with an interest and is irrevocable.

5.3.     No Employment Rights . Nothing contained herein shall be construed as an agreement by the Company or any of its subsidiaries, express or implied, to employ the Grantee or contract for the Grantee’s services, to restrict the Company’s or such subsidiary’s right to discharge the Grantee or cease contracting for the Grantee’s services or to modify, extend or otherwise affect in any manner whatsoever the terms of any employment agreement or contract for services which may exist between the Grantee and the Company or any Affiliate.

5.4.     Application to Other Stock . In the event any capital stock of the Company or any other corporation shall be distributed on, with respect to, or in exchange for Restricted Stock as a stock dividend, stock split, reclassification or recapitalization in connection with any merger or reorganization or otherwise, all restrictions, rights and obligations set forth in this Agreement shall apply with respect to such other capital stock to the same extent as they are, or would have been applicable, to the Restricted Stock on or with respect to which such other capital stock was distributed, and references to “Company” in respect of such distributed stock shall be deemed to refer to the company to which such distributed stock relates.

5.5.     No Third-Party Benefits . Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, none of the provisions of this Agreement shall be for the benefit of, or enforceable by, any third-party beneficiary.

5.6.     Successors and Assigns . Except as provided herein to the contrary, this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors and permitted assigns.

5.7.     No Assignment . Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the Grantee may not assign any of his, her or its rights under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Company, which consent may be withheld in its sole discretion. The Company shall be permitted to assign its rights or obligations under this Agreement so long as such assignee agrees to perform all of the Company’s obligations hereunder.

5.8.     Severability . The validity, legality or enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected even if one or more of the provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect.

5.9.     Equitable Relief . The Grantee acknowledges that, in the event of a threatened or actual breach of any of the provisions of this Agreement, damages alone will be an inadequate remedy, and such breach will cause



the Company great, immediate and irreparable injury and damage. Accordingly, the Grantee agrees that the Company shall be entitled to injunctive and other equitable relief, and that such relief shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any remedies it may have at law or under this Agreement.

5.10.     Arbitration .

5.10.1.     General . Any controversy, dispute, or claim between the parties to this Agreement, including any claim arising out of, in connection with, or in relation to the formation, interpretation, performance or breach of this Agreement shall be settled exclusively by arbitration, before a single arbitrator, in accordance with this Section 5.10 and the then most applicable rules of the American Arbitration Association. Judgment upon any award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered by any state or federal court having jurisdiction thereof. Such arbitration shall be administered by the American Arbitration Association. Arbitration shall be the exclusive remedy for determining any such dispute, regardless of its nature. Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may in an appropriate matter apply to a court for provisional relief, including a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction, on the ground that the award to which the applicant may be entitled in arbitration may be rendered ineffectual without provisional relief. Unless mutually agreed by the parties otherwise, any arbitration shall take place in the City of Las Vegas, Nevada.

5.10.2.     Selection of Arbitrator . In the event the parties are unable to agree upon an arbitrator, the parties shall select a single arbitrator from a list of nine arbitrators drawn by the parties at random from the “Independent” (or “Gold Card”) list of retired judges or, at the option of the Grantee, from a list of nine persons (which shall be retired judges or corporate or litigation attorneys experienced in stock incentives and buy-sell agreements) provided by the office of the American Arbitration Association having jurisdiction over Las Vegas, Nevada. If the parties are unable to agree upon an arbitrator from the list so drawn, then the parties shall each strike names alternately from the list, with the first to strike being determined by lot. After each party has used four strikes, the remaining name on the list shall be the arbitrator. If such person is unable to serve for any reason, the parties shall repeat this process until an arbitrator is selected.

5.10.3.     Applicability of Arbitration; Remedial Authority . This agreement to resolve any disputes by binding arbitration shall extend to claims against any parent, subsidiary or affiliate of each party, and, when acting within such capacity, any officer, director, stockholder, employee or agent of each party, or of any of the above, and shall apply as well to claims arising out of state and federal statutes and local ordinances as well as to claims arising under the common law. In the event of a dispute subject to this paragraph the parties shall be entitled to reasonable discovery subject to the discretion of the arbitrator. The remedial authority of the arbitrator (which shall include the right to grant injunctive or other equitable relief) shall be the same as, but no greater than, would be the remedial power of a court having jurisdiction over the parties and their dispute. The arbitrator shall, upon an appropriate motion, dismiss any claim without an evidentiary hearing if the party bringing the motion establishes that he or it would be entitled to summary judgment if the matter had been pursued in court litigation. In the event of a conflict between the applicable rules of the American Arbitration Association and these procedures, the provisions of these procedures shall govern.

5.10.4.     Fees and Costs . Any filing or administrative fees shall be borne initially by the party requesting arbitration. The Company shall be responsible for the costs and fees of the arbitration, unless the Grantee wishes to contribute (up to 50%) of the costs and fees of the arbitration. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the prevailing party in such arbitration, as determined by the arbitrator, and in any enforcement or other court proceedings, shall be entitled, to the extent permitted by law, to reimbursement from the other party for all of the prevailing party’s costs (including but not limited to the arbitrator’s compensation), expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

5.10.5.     Award Final and Binding . The arbitrator shall render an award and written opinion, and the award shall be final and binding upon the parties. If any of the provisions of this paragraph, or of this Agreement, are determined to be unlawful or otherwise unenforceable, in whole or in part, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be reformed to the extent necessary to carry out its provisions to the greatest extent possible and to insure that the resolution of all conflicts between the parties, including those arising out of statutory claims, shall be resolved by neutral, binding arbitration.



If a court should find that the arbitration provisions of this Agreement are not absolutely binding, then the parties intend any arbitration decision and award to be fully admissible in evidence in any subsequent action, given great weight by any finder of fact, and treated as determinative to the maximum extent permitted by law.

5.11.     Withholding Taxes . The Company shall be entitled to require a cash payment by or on behalf of the Grantee and/or to deduct from any compensation payable to the Grantee the minimum amount of any sums required by federal, state or local tax law to be withheld (or other such sums that that will not cause adverse accounting consequences for the Company and is permitted under applicable withholding rules promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service or another applicable governmental entity) with respect to the Restricted Stock Awards.

5.12.     Section 83(b) Election . If the Grantee makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code, or any successor section thereto, to be taxed with respect to the Restricted Stock as of the Grant Date, the Grantee shall deliver a copy of such election to the Company immediately after filing such election with the Internal Revenue Service, together with any required tax withholding. The Grantee hereby acknowledges that it is the Grantee’s sole responsibility, and not the Company’s, to file timely the election under Section 83(b) of the Code.

5.13.     Rights as Shareholder . During the period until the Restricted Stock vests as provided in Section 3 hereof, the Grantee shall, except as set forth in this Section 5.13, have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to the Restricted Stock, including the right to vote the underlying shares of Common Stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the Grantee shall not have the right to Transfer the Restricted Stock prior to the vesting thereof as set forth in Section 3 hereof, (ii) any dividends associated with the Restricted Stock will be paid to the Grantee at the time such shares vest as set forth in Section 3 hereof, and will not be paid to the Grantee in the event that the shares do not become so vested and (iii) such Restricted Stock shall be subject to all terms, conditions, and restrictions, including, but not limited to, forfeiture without consideration, of this Agreement and the Plan.
  
5.14.     Headings . The section headings in this Agreement are inserted only as a matter of convenience, and in no way define, limit, extend or interpret the scope of this Agreement or of any particular section.

5.15.     Number and Gender . Throughout this Agreement, as the context may require, (a) the masculine gender includes the feminine and the neuter gender includes the masculine and the feminine; (b) the singular tense and number includes the plural, and the plural tense and number includes the singular; (c) the past tense includes the present, and the present tense includes the past; (d) references to parties, sections, paragraphs and exhibits mean the parties, sections, paragraphs and exhibits of and to this Agreement; and (e) periods of days, weeks or months mean calendar days, weeks or months.

5.16.     Electronic Delivery and Disclosure . The Company may, in its sole discretion, decide to deliver or disclose, as applicable, any documents related to this Award granted under the Plan, future awards that may be granted under the Plan, the prospectus related to the Plan, the Company’s annual reports or proxy statements by electronic means or to request Grantee’s consent to participate in the Plan by electronic means. Grantee hereby consents to receive such documents delivered electronically or to retrieve such documents furnished electronically, as applicable, and agrees to participate in the Plan through any online or electronic system established and maintained by the Company or another third party designated by the Company.

5.17.     Data Privacy . Grantee agrees that all of Grantee’s information that is described or referenced in this Agreement and the Plan may be used by the Company, its affiliates and the designated broker and its affiliates to administer and manage Grantee’s participation in the Plan.

5.18.     Acknowledgments of Grantee . Grantee has reviewed the Plan and this Agreement in their entirety, has had an opportunity to obtain the advice of counsel prior to executing this Agreement, fully understands all provisions of the Plan and this Agreement and, by accepting the Notice of Grant, acknowledges and agrees to all of the provisions of the Plan and this Agreement.

5.19.     Complete Agreement . The Grant Notice, this Restricted Stock Award Agreement, the Plan, and applicable provisions (if any) contained in a written employment agreement between the Company or an Affiliate



and the Grantee constitute the parties’ entire agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all agreements, representations, warranties, statements, promises and understandings, whether oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof.

5.20.     Waiver of Jury Trial . TO THE EXTENT EITHER PARTY INITIATES LITIGATION INVOLVING THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY ASPECT OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN US (EVEN IF OTHER PARTIES OR OTHER CLAIMS ARE INCLUDED IN SUCH LITIGATION), ALL OF THE PARTIES WAIVE THEIR RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY. THIS WAIVER WILL APPLY TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION THAT ARE OR MIGHT BE INCLUDED IN SUCH ACTION, INCLUDING CLAIMS RELATED TO THE ENFORCEMENT OR INTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT, ALLEGATIONS OF STATE OR FEDERAL STATUTORY VIOLATIONS, FRAUD, MISREPRESENTATION, OR SIMILAR CAUSES OF ACTION, AND IN CONNECTION WITH ANY LEGAL ACTION INITIATED FOR THE RECOVERY OF DAMAGES BETWEEN OR AMONG US OR BETWEEN OR AMONG ANY OF OUR OWNERS, AFFILIATES, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS.

5.21.     Merger with Penn National Gaming. Reference is made to the Merger Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2017, by and among Pinnacle, Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Franchise Merger Sub, Inc. (the “ Merger Agreement ”). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan or in any employment agreement between the Grantee and Pinnacle or one of its Affiliates, upon and following the occurrence of the Effective Time, as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement, this Award shall be treated in accordance with Section 2.4(c) of the Merger Agreement.

Exhibit 10.15

THIRD AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Third Amendment”) is made effective the 29 th day of November, 2017 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Neil E. Walkoff, an individual (“Executive”), with respect to the following facts and circumstances:
RECITALS

The Company and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement on October 13, 2014 (the “Original Agreement”), which was amended by the First Amendment to Employment Agreement effective January 1, 2016 and the Second Amendment to Employment Agreement effective January 1, 2017 (collectively, with the Original Agreement, the “Employment Agreement”).

The Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement pursuant to the terms set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
AMENDMENT
1.    As of the Effective Date, Article 2, Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement (Duties) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following new Article 2, Section 2.1:

“2.1     Duties . Executive shall perform all the duties and obligations generally associated with the position of Executive Vice President, Operations with responsibility for oversight of River City Casino & Hotel (St. Louis, Missouri), Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles (St. Charles, Missouri), Boomtown New Orleans (Harvey, Louisiana), Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago (East Chicago, Indiana), Belterra Casino Resort (Florence, Indiana), Belterra Park Gaming & Entertainment Center (Cincinnati, Ohio), The Meadows Racetrack and Casino (Washington, Pennsylvania) and Ameristar Casino Hotel Vicksburg (Vicksburg, Mississippi) and such other properties as may be assigned from time to time by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, subject to the control and supervision of the Company's Chief Executive Officer, and such other executive duties consistent with the foregoing as may be assigned to Executive from time to time by the Company. Executive shall report directly to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Executive shall perform the services contemplated herein faithfully, diligently, to the best of Executive’s ability and in the best interests of the Company. Executive shall at all times perform such services in compliance with, and to the extent of Executive’s authority, shall to the best of Executive’s ability cause the Company to be in compliance with, any and all laws, rules and regulations applicable to the Company of which Executive is aware. Executive shall, at all times and in all material respects adhere to and obey any and all written internal rules and regulations governing the conduct of the Company’s employees, as established or modified from time to time; provided, however, in the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Agreement and any such rules or regulations, the provisions of this Agreement shall control.”
2.    Except as modified herein, all other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Employment Agreement and this Third Amendment, the terms of this Third Amendment shall apply. No modification may be made to the Employment Agreement or this Third Amendment except in writing and signed by both the Company and Executive.

[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]

1


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Third Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first written above.
EXECUTIVE
 
PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
 
 
 
/s/ Neil E. Walkoff
 
By: /s/ Anthony M. Sanfilippo
Neil E. Walkoff
 
Anthony M. Sanfilippo, Chief Executive Officer

2

Exhibit 10.26



Summary of Director Compensation
Director Fees
The compensation of the non-employee directors of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”), is paid in the form of an annual retainer, meeting and chair fees and stock-based awards. The fees that each non-employee director or committee chair received for his or her service are the following:  
An annual retainer of $80,000;

An additional $20,000 retainer for the Chair of the Audit Committee;

An additional $20,000 retainer for the Chair of the Compensation Committee;

An additional $20,000 retainer for the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee;

An additional $50,000 retainer for the Lead Independent Director;

An attendance fee of $1,500 for each Board meeting or committee meeting (telephonic or in person), other than meetings of the Audit Committee (whether regularly scheduled meetings or special meetings); and

An attendance fee of $2,000 for each meeting of the Audit Committee (whether regularly scheduled or special meetings).

Equity Grants
In 2017, Pinnacle granted 10,000 restricted stock units to each non-employee director who was then serving. The restricted stock units vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant on May 1, 2018.




Exhibit 10.33


SECOND AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
EXCURSION BOAT SPONSORSHIP AND OPERATIONS AGREEMENT


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EXCURSION BOAT SPONSORSHIP AND OPERATIONS AGREEMENT (the “Second Amendment”) is made and entered into this 16 th day of May, 2017, by and between Iowa West Racing Association, an Iowa nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Iowa West”), and Ameristar Casino Council Bluffs, LLC, an Iowa limited liability Company (successor to Ameristar Casino Council Bluffs, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Ameristar”)).

WHEREAS, on October 7, 2002, Iowa West and Ameristar entered into that certain Amended and Restated Excursion Boat Sponsorship and Operations Agreement (the “Original Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, on November 18, 2004, Iowa West and Ameristar amended the Original Agreement by the execution of a Second Amended and Restated Excursion Boat Sponsorship and Operations Agreement (the “Amended Agreement”): and

WHEREAS, on February 16, 2010, Iowa West and Ameristar entered into that certain Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Excursion Boat Sponsorship and Operations Agreement (the “First Amendment” and together with the Amended Agreement, hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, the Agreement expires on March 31, 2018; and

WHEREAS, on February 8, 2016, Ameristar Casino Council Bluffs, Inc., an Iowa corporation, converted into an Iowa limited liability company named Ameristar Casino Council Bluffs, LLC; and

WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend the Agreement to extend the term thereof and to amend certain other terms and conditions of the Agreement, as hereinafter set forth.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.
Section 7(a) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following new Section 7(a):

“The term of the Agreement shall be for an additional five (5) years, to expire on March 31, 2023. Provided that Ameristar is not in default under the Agreement, either at the time of exercise or at the time the Option Term (as hereinafter defined) is to commence, Ameristar shall have the option to extend the term of the Agreement for one (1) additional term of three (3) years, to expire on March 31, 2026 (the “Option Term”). Notice of the exercise of such option shall be given to Iowa West on or before October 1, 2022. If notice is not given to Iowa West on or before such date, this option shall lapse and be of no further force or effect. If exercised, all terms and conditions of the Agreement, as further amended hereby, shall be applicable to the Option Term. Any duty or obligation set forth in the Agreement, that is to be performed during the term of the Agreement, shall also be performed during the Option Term if the option to extend the term is exercised.
2.    This Second Amendment shall only become effective upon approval of the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission (the “Commission”). The parties shall coordinate their efforts and cooperate with one another to seek this approval as expeditiously as possible. Until such time as this Second Amendment is approved by the Commission, the parties shall continue to perform the Agreement as if this Second Amendment had not been entered into by the parties. This Second Amendment will become immediately effective upon approval by the Commission.

3.    Except as specifically amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as originally executed and approved by the Commission. This Second Amendment shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Capitalized terms in this Second Amendment that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings set forth in the Agreement.


[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank]

1


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.
IOWA WEST RACING ASSOCIATION
 
AMERISTAR CASINO COUNCIL BLUFFS, LLC
 
 
 
By: /s/ Rick Killion
 
By: /s/ Carlos A. Ruisanchez
IWRA President
 
Carlos A. Ruisanchez,
President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
By: /s/ Tara Slevin
 
 
IWRA Secretary
 
 


2


Exhibit 11

Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.
Computation of Earnings Per Share

 
For the years ended December 31,
 
Basic
 
Diluted (a)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands, except per share data)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
56,518

 
58,741

 
61,030

 
56,518

 
58,741

 
61,030

Potential dilution from share-based payment awards (a)

 

 

 
5,393

 

 
2,291

Total shares
56,518

 
58,741

 
61,030

 
61,911

 
58,741

 
63,321

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
61,758

 
$
(457,880
)
 
$
42,115

 
$
61,758

 
$
(457,880
)
 
$
42,115

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 
433

 
5,494

 

 
433

 
5,494

Net income (loss)
61,758

 
(457,447
)
 
47,609

 
61,758

 
(457,447
)
 
47,609

Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest
1,346

 
37

 
1,278

 
1,346

 
37

 
1,278

Net income (loss) attributable to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.
$
63,104

 
$
(457,410
)
 
$
48,887

 
$
63,104

 
$
(457,410
)
 
$
48,887

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Per share data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
1.12

 
$
(7.80
)
 
$
0.71

 
$
1.02

 
$
(7.80
)
 
$
0.68

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 
0.01

 
0.09

 

 
0.01

 
0.09

Net income (loss) per common share
$
1.12

 
$
(7.79
)
 
$
0.80

 
$
1.02

 
$
(7.79
)
 
$
0.77


(a)
When the impact of share-based payment awards is anti-dilutive, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding is used in the determination of basic and diluted earnings per share.




Exhibit 12

Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

 
For the year ended December 31,
 
2013
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
Earnings:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations before losses from equity method investments
$
(96,254
)
 
$
49,592

 
$
56,758

 
$
(485,825
)
 
$
47,245

Add: Fixed charges
178,723

 
261,623

 
250,313

 
342,346

 
392,312

Less: Capitalized interest
(3,282
)
 
(2,854
)
 

 
(105
)
 
(64
)
Total earnings
$
79,187

 
$
308,361

 
$
307,071

 
$
(143,584
)
 
$
439,493

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed charges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest (a)
$
170,218

 
$
253,048

 
$
244,708

 
$
334,777

 
$
381,349

Capitalized interest
3,282

 
2,854

 

 
105

 
64

Estimated interest portion of rent expense
5,223

 
5,721

 
5,605

 
7,464

 
10,899

Total fixed charges
$
178,723

 
$
261,623

 
$
250,313

 
$
342,346

 
$
392,312

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
(b)

 
1.2x

 
1.2x

 
(b)

 
1.1x

(a)
Inclusive of amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discounts/premiums and exclusive of interest income.
(b)
Due principally to large non-cash charges deducted to compute earnings, earnings were less than fixed charges by $99.5 million and $485.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2016, respectively.





Exhibit 21
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.
List of Subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
Subsidiary
 
State of Organization
Name(s) under which Subsidiary does Business
Ameristar Casino Black Hawk, LLC
 
Colorado
Ameristar Black Hawk
Ameristar Casino Council Bluffs, LLC
 
Iowa
Ameristar Council Bluffs
Ameristar Casino East Chicago, LLC
 
Indiana
Ameristar East Chicago
Ameristar Casino Kansas City, LLC
 
Missouri
Ameristar Kansas City
Ameristar Casino St. Charles, LLC
 
Missouri
Ameristar St. Charles
Ameristar East Chicago Holdings, LLC
 
Indiana
 
Ameristar Lake Charles Holdings, LLC
 
Louisiana
 
Belterra Resort Indiana, LLC
 
Nevada
Belterra Resort
Boomtown, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cactus Pete’s, LLC
 
Nevada
Cactus Petes and Horseshu
Double Bogey, LLC
 
Texas
 
Louisiana-I Gaming, A Louisiana Partnership in Commendam
 
Louisiana
Boomtown New Orleans
Mountain Laurel Racing, Inc.
 
Delaware
 
OGLE HAUS, LLC
 
Indiana
Ogle Haus Inn
Pinnacle MLS, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Pinnacle Retama Partners, LLC
 
Texas
Retama Park Racetrack
PNK (Baton Rouge) Partnership
 
Louisiana
L’Auberge Baton Rouge
PNK (BOSSIER CITY), L.L.C.
 
Louisiana
Boomtown Bossier City
PNK Development 7, LLC
 
Delaware
Heartland Poker Tour
PNK Development 8, LLC
 
Delaware
 
PNK Development 9, LLC
 
Delaware
 
PNK Development 33, LLC
 
Delaware
 
PNK (LAKE CHARLES), L.L.C.
 
Louisiana
L’Auberge Lake Charles
PNK (Ohio), LLC
 
Ohio
Belterra Park
PNK (River City), LLC
 
Missouri
River City
PNK (SA), LLC
 
Texas
 
PNK (SAM), LLC
 
Texas
 
PNK Vicksburg, LLC
 
Delaware
Ameristar Vicksburg
Washington Trotting Association, LLC
 
Delaware
The Meadows
 



Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

(1)
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-219105) pertaining to the Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. shelf registration,

(2)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-210969) pertaining to the Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. 2016 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan,

(3)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-210970) pertaining to the Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. Directors Deferred Compensation Plan,

(4)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-210971) pertaining to the Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan,

(5)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-210972) pertaining to the Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. 401(k) Investment Plan, and

(6)
Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-222936) of Penn National Gaming, Inc.

of our reports dated March 1, 2018 , with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2017 .

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
March 1, 2018





Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Anthony M. Sanfilippo, certify that:
 
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 1, 2018
/s/ Anthony M. Sanfilippo
Anthony M. Sanfilippo
Chief Executive Officer





Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Carlos A. Ruisanchez, certify that:
 
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 1, 2018
/s/ Carlos A. Ruisanchez
Carlos A. Ruisanchez
President and Chief Financial Officer





Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 1, 2018
 
/s/ Anthony M. Sanfilippo
Name:
Anthony M. Sanfilippo
Title:
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
/s/ Carlos A. Ruisanchez
Name:
Carlos A. Ruisanchez
Title:
President and Chief Financial
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Exhibit 99.1

GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND GAMING MATTERS
The ownership and operation of gaming companies are subject to extensive regulation. In particular, Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, Ohio and Pennsylvania have laws, statutes, ordinances and/or regulations (collectively, “Gaming Laws”) affecting the operation of our gaming business and the ownership and disposition of our securities. We summarize these Gaming Laws below. In addition, the ownership and operation of racetracks are subject to extensive regulation. Generally, regulations governing our horse racing operations are administered separately from the regulations governing gaming operations, with separate licenses and license fee structures. We summarize the regulations related to horse racing operations below.
Our certificate of incorporation requires that any person (as defined in our certificate of incorporation) who owns or controls our securities must comply with Gaming Laws governing such person’s “suitability” as an investor. These provisions apply to all the securities offered by us. Any purchaser or holder of securities that we have offered shall be deemed to have agreed to such provisions. If a person owns or controls our securities or the securities of our affiliated companies and is determined by a gaming authority to be unsuitable to own or control such securities or in the sole discretion of our board of directors is deemed likely to jeopardize our right to conduct gaming activities in any of the jurisdictions in which we conduct or intend to conduct gaming activities, we may redeem, and if required by a gaming authority shall redeem, such person’s securities to the extent required by the gaming authority or deemed necessary or advisable by us.
If a gaming authority requires us, or if we deem it necessary or advisable, to redeem a holder’s securities, we will serve notice on the holder who holds the securities subject to redemption and will call for the redemption of the securities of such holder at a redemption price equal to that required to be paid by the gaming authority making the finding of unsuitability, or if such gaming authority does not require a certain price per share to be paid, a sum deemed reasonable by us.
Colorado . The ownership and operation of casino gaming facilities in Colorado are subject to the Colorado Limited Gaming Act of 1991 and the regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, the “Colorado Act”). Gaming operations are subject to the licensing and regulatory control of the Division of Gaming (“Colorado Division”). The Director of the Colorado Division (“Colorado Director”), pursuant to regulations promulgated by, and subject to the review of, a five-member Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission (“Colorado Commission”), has been granted broad power to ensure compliance with the Colorado gaming laws and regulations (collectively, the “Colorado Regulations”). The Colorado Division and the Colorado Commission are collectively referred to as the “Colorado Gaming Authorities.”
The Colorado Director may inspect without notice, impound or remove any gaming device. The Colorado Director may examine and copy any licensee’s records, may investigate the background and conduct of licensees and their employees, and may bring disciplinary actions against licensees and their employees. The Colorado Director may also conduct detailed background investigations of persons who loan money to, or otherwise provide financing to, a licensee.
The Colorado Commission can issue five types of gaming and gaming-related licenses, and has delegated authority to the Colorado Director to issue certain types of licenses and approve certain changes in ownership. The licenses are revocable and non-transferable. Our subsidiary, Ameristar Casino Black Hawk, LLC (the “Colorado Casino”) is licensed by the Colorado Gaming Authorities. The failure or inability of the Colorado Casino, or the failure or inability of others associated with the Colorado Casino, including us, to maintain necessary gaming licenses or approvals would have a material adverse effect on our operations. All persons employed by the Colorado Casino, and involved, directly or indirectly, in gaming operations in Colorado also are required to obtain a Colorado gaming license. All licenses must be renewed every two years. As a general rule, under the Colorado Regulations, no person may have an “ownership interest” in more than three retail gaming licenses in Colorado. The Colorado Commission has ruled that a person does not have an ownership interest in a retail gaming licensee for purposes of the multiple license prohibition if:
that person has less than a 5% ownership interest in an institutional investor that has an ownership interest in a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee;
a person has a 5% or more ownership interest in an institutional investor, but the institutional investor has less than a 5% ownership interest in a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee;
an institutional investor has less than a 5% ownership interest in a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee;
an institutional investor possesses voting securities in a fiduciary capacity for another person, and does not exercise voting control over 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities of a publicly traded licensee or of a publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee;




a registered broker or dealer retains possession of voting securities of a publicly traded licensee or of a publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee for its customers and not for its own account, and exercises voting rights for less than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee;
a registered broker or dealer acts as a market maker for the stock of a publicly traded licensee or of a publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee and exercises voting rights in less than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of the publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee;
an underwriter is holding securities of a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee as part of an underwriting for no more than 90 days after the beginning of such underwriting if it exercises voting rights of less than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee;
a book entry transfer facility holds voting securities for third parties, if it exercises voting rights with respect to less than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee; or
a person’s sole ownership interest is less than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of the publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee.
In addition, pursuant to the Colorado Regulations, no manufacturer or distributor of slot machines or associated equipment may, without notification being provided to the Colorado Division within ten days, knowingly have an interest in any casino operator, allow any of its officers or any other person with a substantial interest in such business to have such an interest, employ any person if that person is employed by a casino operator, or allow any casino operator or person with a substantial interest therein to have an interest in a manufacturer’s or distributor’s business. A “substantial interest” means the lesser of (i) as large an interest in an entity as any other person or (ii) any financial or equity interest equal to or greater than 5%. The Colorado Commission has ruled that a person does not have a “substantial interest” if such person’s sole ownership interest in such licensee is through the ownership of less than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded affiliated company of a licensee. We are a “publicly traded corporation” under the Colorado Regulations.
Under the Colorado Regulations, any person or entity having any direct or indirect interest in a gaming licensee or an applicant for a gaming license, may be required to supply the Colorado Commission with substantial information, including, but not limited to, background information, source of funding information, a sworn statement that such person or entity is not holding his or her interest for any other party, and fingerprints. Such information, investigation and licensing (or finding of suitability) as an “associated person” automatically will be required of all persons (other than certain institutional investors discussed below) which directly or indirectly beneficially own 10% or more of a direct or indirect beneficial ownership or interest in the Colorado Casino, through their beneficial ownership of any class of voting securities of us, or the Colorado Casino. Those persons must report their interest within 10 days (including institutional investors) and file appropriate applications within 45 days after acquiring that interest (other than certain institutional investors discussed below). Persons (including institutional investors) who directly or indirectly beneficially own 5% or more (but less than 10%) of a direct or indirect beneficial ownership or interest in the Colorado Casino, through their beneficial ownership of any class of voting securities of us or the Colorado Casino, must report their interest to the Colorado Commission within 10 days after acquiring that interest and may be required to provide additional information and to be found suitable. (It is the current practice of the gaming regulators to require findings of suitability for persons beneficially owning 5% or more of a direct or indirect beneficial ownership or interest, other than certain institutional investors discussed below.) If certain institutional investors provide specified information to the Colorado Commission within 45 days after acquiring their interest (which, under the current practice of the gaming regulators is an interest of 5% or more, directly or indirectly) and are holding for investment purposes only, those investors, in the Colorado Commission’s discretion, may be permitted to own up to 19.99% of the Colorado Casino through their beneficial ownership in any class of voting of securities of us or the Colorado Casino, before being required to be found suitable. All licensing and investigation fees will have to be paid by the person in question.
The Colorado Regulations define a “voting security” to be a security the holder of which is entitled to vote generally for the election of a member or members of the board of directors or board of trustees of a corporation or a comparable person or persons of another form of business organization.
The Colorado Commission also has the right to request information from any person directly or indirectly interested in, or employed by, a licensee, and to investigate the moral character, honesty, integrity, prior activities, criminal record, reputation, habits and associations of: (1) all persons licensed pursuant to the Colorado Limited Gaming Act; (2) all officers, directors and stockholders of a licensed privately held corporation; (3) all officers, directors and stockholders holding either a 5% or greater




interest or a controlling interest in a licensed publicly traded corporation; (4) all general partners and all limited partners of a licensed partnership; (5) all persons that have a relationship similar to that of an officer, director or stockholder of a corporation (such as members and managers of a limited liability company); (6) all persons supplying financing or loaning money to any licensee connected with the establishment or operation of limited gaming; (7) all persons having a contract, lease or ongoing financial or business arrangement with any licensee, where such contract, lease or arrangement relates to limited gaming operations, equipment devices or premises; and (8) all persons contracting with or supplying any goods and services to the gaming regulators. Certain public officials and employees are prohibited from having any direct or indirect interest in a license or limited gaming.
Under the Colorado Regulations, every person who is a party to a “gaming contract” (as defined below) or lease with an applicant for a license, or with a licensee, upon the request of the Colorado Commission or the Colorado Director, must promptly provide the Colorado Commission or Colorado Director all information that may be requested concerning financial history, financial holdings, real and personal property ownership, interests in other companies, criminal history, personal history and associations, character, reputation in the community and all other information that might be relevant to a determination of whether a person would be suitable to be licensed by the Colorado Commission. Failure to provide all information requested constitutes sufficient grounds for the Colorado Director or the Colorado Commission to require a licensee or applicant to terminate its “gaming contract” or lease with any person who failed to provide the information requested. In addition, the Colorado Director or the Colorado Commission may require changes in “gaming contracts” before an application is approved or participation in the contract is allowed. A “gaming contract” is defined as an agreement in which a person does business with or on the premises of a licensed entity.
The Colorado Commission and the Colorado Division have interpreted the Colorado Regulations to permit the Colorado Commission to investigate and find suitable persons or entities providing financing to or acquiring securities from us or the Colorado Casino. As noted above, any person or entity required to file information, be licensed or found suitable would be required to pay the costs thereof and of any investigation. Although the Colorado Regulations do not require the prior approval for the execution of credit facilities or issuance of debt securities, the Colorado regulators reserve the right to approve, require changes to or require the termination of any financing, including if a person or entity is required to be found suitable and is not found suitable. In any event, lenders, note holders, and others providing financing will not be able to exercise certain rights and remedies without the prior approval of the Colorado gaming authorities. Information regarding lenders and holders of securities will be periodically reported to the Colorado gaming authorities.
Except under certain limited circumstances relating to slot machine manufacturers and distributors, every person supplying goods, equipment, devices or services to any licensee in return for payment of a percentage, or calculated upon a percentage, of limited gaming activity or income must obtain an operator license or be listed on the retailer’s license where such gaming will take place.
An application for licensure or suitability may be denied for any cause deemed reasonable by the Colorado Commission or the Colorado Director, as appropriate. Specifically, the Colorado Commission and the Colorado Director must deny a license to any applicant who, among other things: (1) fails to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the applicant is qualified; (2) fails to provide information and documentation requested; (3) fails to reveal any fact material to qualification, or supplies information which is untrue or misleading as to a material fact pertaining to qualification; (4) has been convicted of, or has a director, officer, general partner, stockholder, limited partner or other person who has a financial or equity interest in the applicant who has been convicted of, specified crimes, including the service of a sentence upon conviction of a felony in a correctional facility, city or county jail, or community correctional facility or under the state board of parole or any probation department within ten years prior to the date of the application, gambling-related offenses, theft by deception or crimes involving fraud or misrepresentation, is under current prosecution for such crimes (during the pendency of which license determination may be deferred), is a career offender or a member or associate of a career offender cartel, or is a professional gambler; or (5) has refused to cooperate with any state or federal body investigating organized crime, official corruption or gaming offenses. If the Colorado Commission determines that a person or entity is unsuitable to directly or indirectly own interests in us or the Colorado Casino, the Colorado Casino may be sanctioned, which may include the loss of our approvals and licenses.
The Colorado Commission does not need to approve in advance a public offering of securities but rather requires the filing of notice and additional documents prior to a public offering of (i) voting securities, and (ii) non-voting securities if any of the proceeds will be used to pay for the construction of gaming facilities in Colorado, to directly or indirectly acquire an interest in a gaming facility in Colorado, to finance the operation of a gaming facility in Colorado or to retire or extend obligations for any of the foregoing. The Colorado Commission may, in its discretion, require additional information and prior approval of such public offering.




In addition, the Colorado Regulations prohibit a licensee or affiliated company thereof, from paying any unsuitable person any dividends or interest upon any voting securities or any payments or distributions of any kind (except as set forth below), or paying any unsuitable person any remuneration for services or recognizing the exercise of any voting rights by any unsuitable person. Further, under the Colorado Regulations, a licensee or affiliated company thereof may repurchase its voting securities from anyone found unsuitable at the lesser of the cash equivalent to the original investment in the applicable Colorado Casino or the current market price as of the date of the finding of unsuitability unless such voting securities are transferred to a suitable person (as determined by the Colorado Commission) within sixty (60) days after the finding of unsuitability. A licensee or affiliated company must pursue all lawful efforts to require an unsuitable person to relinquish all voting securities, including purchasing such voting securities. The staff of the Colorado Division has taken the position that a licensee or affiliated company may not pay any unsuitable person any interest, dividends or other payments with respect to non-voting securities, other than with respect to pursuing all lawful efforts to require an unsuitable person to relinquish non-voting securities, including by purchasing or redeeming such securities. Further, the regulations require anyone with a material involvement with a licensee, including a director or officer of a holding company, to file for a finding of suitability if required by the Colorado Commission.
Because of their authority to deny an application for a license or suitability, the Colorado Commission and the Colorado Director effectively can disapprove a change in corporate position of a licensee and with respect to any entity which is required to be found suitable, or indirectly can cause us or the Colorado Casino to suspend or dismiss managers, officers, directors and other key employees or sever relationships with other persons who refuse to file appropriate applications or who the authorities find unsuitable to act in such capacities.
Generally, a sale, lease, purchase, conveyance or acquisition of any interest in a licensee is prohibited without the Colorado Commission’s prior approval. However, because we are a publicly traded corporation, persons may acquire an interest in us (even, under current staff interpretations, a controlling interest) without the Colorado Commission’s prior approval, but such persons may be required to file notices with the Colorado Commission and applications for suitability (as discussed above) and the Colorado Commission may, after such acquisition, find such person unsuitable and require them to dispose of their interest. Under some circumstances, we may not sell any interest in our Colorado gaming businesses without the prior approval of the Colorado Commission.
Each casino in Colorado must meet specified architectural requirements, fire safety standards and standards for access for disabled persons. Each casino in Colorado also must not exceed specified gaming square footage limits as a total of each floor and the full building. Each Colorado Casino may permit only individuals 21 or older to gamble in the casino. No Colorado Casino may provide credit to its gaming patrons. Each casino in Colorado must comply with Colorado’s Gambling Payment Intercept Act, which governs the collection of unpaid child support costs on certain cash winnings from limited gaming. Each casino in Colorado also must take measures to prevent the use of Electronic Benefits Transfer cards at automated teller machines located on its premises. Further, on November 3, 2015, the Colorado Division issued an industry bulletin alerting Colorado Casinos that legal and illegal Colorado marijuana operations may be using Colorado Casinos to launder their money and reminding each casino to be diligent in complying with federal anti-money laundering reporting requirements so that unusual financial transactions or suspected incidents of money laundering, particularly by legal and illegal Colorado marijuana operations, may be promptly and sufficiently investigated.
The Colorado Constitution currently permits gaming only in a limited number of cities and certain commercial districts in such cities. As originally enacted by amendment to the Colorado Constitution, limited stakes gaming in Colorado was limited to slot machines, blackjack and poker, with a maximum single bet of $5.00, and casinos could operate only between 8:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m. In November 2008, however, Colorado voters approved a subsequent amendment to the Colorado Constitution that allowed the towns of Cripple Creek, Black Hawk, and Central City to add table games of craps and roulette, increase the maximum single bet to $100.00, and increase the permitted hours of operation to 24 hours per day effective July 2, 2009. In 2006, a statewide indoor smoking ban went into effect in the State of Colorado, but casinos were exempted from the original legislation. Effective January 1, 2008, the Colorado legislature repealed the exemption and extended the indoor smoking ban to casinos.
A licensee is required to provide information and file periodic reports with the Colorado Division, including identifying those who have a 5% or greater ownership, financial or equity interest in the licensee, or who have the ability to control the licensee, or who have the ability to exercise significant influence over the licensee, or who loan money or other things of value to a licensee, or who have the right to share in revenues of limited gaming, or to whom any interest or share in profits of limited gaming has been pledged as security for a debt or performance of an act. A licensee, and any parent company or subsidiary of a licensee, who has applied to a foreign jurisdiction for licensure or permission to conduct gaming, or who possesses a license to conduct foreign gaming, is required to notify the Colorado Division. Any person licensed by the Colorado Commission and any associated person of a licensee must report criminal convictions and criminal charges to the Colorado Division.




The Colorado Commission has broad authority to sanction, fine, suspend and revoke a license for violations of the Colorado Regulations. Violations of many provisions of the Colorado Regulations also can result in criminal penalties.
The Colorado Constitution permits a gaming tax of up to 40% on adjusted gross gaming proceeds, and authorizes the Colorado Commission to change the rate annually. The current gaming tax rate is:
0.25% on adjusted gross gaming proceeds of up to and including $2.0 million,
2% over $2.0 million up to and including $5.0 million,
9% over $5.0 million up to and including $8.0 million,
11% over $8.0 million up to and including $10.0 million,
16% over $10.0 million up to and including $13.0 million, and
20% on adjusted gross gaming proceeds in excess of $13.0 million.
The City of Black Hawk imposes an annual device tax of $945 per gaming device, which may be revised from time to time and was increased in 2014. The City of Black Hawk also has imposed other fees, including a business improvement district fee and transportation fee, calculated based on the number of devices and may revise the same or impose additional such fees. Colorado participates in multi-state lotteries.
The sale of alcoholic beverages is subject to licensing, control and regulation by the Colorado liquor agencies. All persons who directly or indirectly hold a 10% or more interest in, or 10% or more of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Colorado Casinos, through their ownership of us or the Colorado Casino, must file applications and possibly be investigated by the Colorado liquor agencies. The Colorado liquor agencies also may investigate those persons who, directly or indirectly, loan money to or have any financial interest in liquor licensees. In addition, there are restrictions on stockholders, directors and officers of liquor licensees preventing such persons from being a stockholder, director, officer or otherwise interested in some persons lending money to liquor licensees and from making loans to other liquor licensees. All licenses are revocable and transferable only in accordance with all applicable laws. The Colorado liquor agencies have the full power to limit, condition, suspend or revoke any liquor license and any disciplinary action could (and revocation would) have a material adverse effect upon the operations of us or the Colorado Casino.
Persons directly or indirectly interested in the Colorado Casino may be limited in certain other types of liquor licenses in which they may have an interest, and specifically cannot have an interest in a retail liquor license (but may have an interest in a hotel and restaurant liquor license and several other types of liquor licenses). No person can hold more than three retail gaming tavern liquor licenses. The remedies of certain lenders may be limited by applicable liquor laws and regulations.
Indiana. Pinnacle operates Ameristar Casino East Chicago and Belterra Resort Indiana (collectively, the “Indiana casinos”) through two wholly owned subsidiaries that hold casino licenses issued by the Indiana Gaming Commission (the “Indiana Commission”). Pinnacle leases the real property on which the Indiana casinos are operated under a master lease agreement with GLP Capital, LP (“GLP”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc., a publicly traded real estate investment trust. GLP holds a permanent Indiana supplier’s license issued by the Indiana Commission.
The ownership and operation of casinos at Indiana-based sites are subject to extensive state regulation under the Indiana Riverboat Gambling Act (the “Indiana Act”), as well as regulations which the Indiana Commission has adopted pertaining to the Indiana Act. The Indiana Act grants broad and pervasive regulatory powers and authorities to the Indiana Commission. The comprehensive regulations cover ownership, reporting, rules of game and operational matters; thus, the Indiana Act and regulations are significant to prospects for successfully operating the Indiana casinos. The Indiana Act has been challenged based on its constitutionality on two occasions and was found constitutional on both occasions.
The Indiana Act authorizes the licensure of ten casinos to be operated from counties that are contiguous to the Ohio River and Lake Michigan. In April 1997, Ameristar East Chicago commenced operations in Lake Michigan under the ownership of Showboat Marina Casino Partnership. In October 2000, Belterra Resort Indiana commenced operations along the Ohio River. Five of the riverboats are in counties contiguous to the Ohio River and five are in counties contiguous to Lake Michigan. The Indiana Act originally included an eleventh license for a county contiguous to Patoka Lake. In April 2003, the Indiana General Assembly passed legislation that eliminated the license for a county contiguous to Patoka Lake, but authorized the establishment and operation of a riverboat casino in French Lick, Indiana. Under this legislation, the Indiana Commission is authorized to enter into an operating agreement for up to 20 years with a qualified operator for this facility. The Indiana Commission selected an operator for the facility and the French Lick casino began operations in November 2006.




In 2007, the Indiana General Assembly adopted legislation that authorized the holders of Indiana’s two parimutuel racing permits to obtain gambling game licenses from the Indiana Commission and install up to 2,000 slot machines at their respective racetracks. The first of these new racinos opened on June 2, 2008 in Anderson, and the second racino opened one week later in Shelbyville. Both racinos are regulated by the Indiana Commission, which has authorized the installation of an additional 200 slot machines at each racino.
In 2015, the Indiana General Assembly authorized table games at the racinos beginning in 2021 if approved by the Indiana Commission. The number of gaming positions at a racino offering table games would be capped at 2,200.
The 2015 legislation also prohibited the governor of Indiana from entering into, amending or modifying a tribal-state compact with an Indian tribe without ratification by the Indiana General Assembly,
A license is a revocable privilege and is not a property right under the Indiana Act. In 2003, the Indiana General Assembly passed legislation that permits a company to own up to 100% of two separate licenses. Under the Indiana Act, however, no person may have an ownership interest in more than two licenses.
An Indiana license has an initial effective period of five years; thereafter, a license is subject to annual renewal. After the expiration of the initial license, the Indiana Commission will conduct a complete re-investigation every three years, but the Indiana Commission reserves the right to investigate licenses at any times it deems necessary. The Indiana Commission has broad discretion over the initial issuance of licenses and over the renewal, revocation, suspension, restriction and control of licenses. Officers, directors and principal owners of the actual license holder and employees who are to work at the casino property are subject to substantial disclosure requirements as a part of securing and maintaining necessary licenses. Belterra Resorts’ most recent one-year renewal is valid through October 22, 2018, and Ameristar East Chicago’s most recent one-year renewal is valid through April 14, 2018.
The Indiana Commission may adopt a resolution authorizing a trustee to temporarily conduct gambling operations on a riverboat if (1) the Indiana Commission revokes or declines to renew the license; (2) a proposed transferee is denied a license when attempting to purchase the riverboat and the person attempting to sell the riverboat is unable or unwilling to retain ownership or control; or (3) a licensee agrees in writing to relinquish control of the riverboat. Each licensee is required to submit for approval by the Indiana Commission a written power of attorney identifying the person who would serve as the licensee’s trustee to operate the riverboat. The Indiana Commission has developed a model Power of Attorney (“POA”) that grants the trustee broad and exclusive authority to exercise and perform those acts and powers concerning real and personal property transactions, litigation, insurance, employees and banking transactions. The model POA also authorizes the trustee, on behalf of the licensee, to commence, manage, and consent to relief in a case involving the licensee under the bankruptcy code without the consent of the licensee. A riverboat’s owner has 180 days after the date that the resolution is adopted to sell the riverboat and its related properties to a suitable owner who is approved by the Indiana Commission. If the owner is unable to sell the property within that time frame, the trustee may take any action necessary to sell the property to a person who meets the requirements for licensure under the Indiana Act. During the time period that the trustee is operating the casino gambling operation, the trustee has exclusive and broad authority over the casino gambling operations.
Contracts to which the Indiana casinos are parties are subject to disclosure and approval processes imposed by the regulations. A licensee may not enter into or perform any contract or transaction in which it transfers or receives consideration which is not commercially reasonable or which does not reflect the fair market value of the goods or services rendered or received. All contracts are subject to disapproval by the Indiana Commission. Suppliers of gaming equipment and materials and non-governmental lessors of casino real property must also be licensed as suppliers under the Indiana Act.
Licensees are statutorily required to disclose to the Indiana Commission the identity of all directors, officers and persons holding direct or indirect beneficial interests of 1% or greater. The Indiana Commission also requires a broad and comprehensive disclosure of financial and operating information on licensees and their principal officers, their parent corporations and other upstream owners. The Indiana Act prohibits contributions to a candidate for a state, legislative, or local office, to a candidate’s committee or to a regular party committee by the holder of a license or a supplier’s license, by a political action committee of the licensee, by an officer of a licensee, by an officer of a person that holds at least a 1% interest in the licensee or by a person holding at least a 1% interest in the licensee.
Prior to June 2002, riverboat casinos were required to conduct excursions, which limited the times during which patrons could enter the riverboat. In June 2002, the Indiana General Assembly authorized riverboats to implement a flexible boarding schedule and remain dockside in order to allow patrons to enter the riverboat at any time during operating hours. Each of the 10 riverboats in operation at the time implemented flexible scheduling. In 2011, the Indiana General Assembly adopted legislation to allow riverboat licensees to either construct a permanently moored craft or convert a self-propelled excursion boat into a permanently moored craft.




In 2015, the Indiana General Assembly adopted legislation that permits a licensee, upon approval of the Indiana Commission, to relocate gaming operations from the riverboat casino to a land-based facility, provided: (1) the facility is located on property adjacent to the dock site of the riverboat casino; (2) the facility complies with all applicable building codes and any safety requirements imposed by the Indiana Commission; and (3) the owner meets other conditions imposed by the Indiana Commission. The 2015 legislation also caps the number of gambling games offered by a licensee or an operating agent at the greatest number of gambling games offered since January 1, 2007, regardless of whether the licensee relocates gaming operations to an inland casino. In February 2016, the Indiana Commission granted approval to Tropicana Evansville to relocate its docked riverboat casino and build a new casino inland. The new Tropicana Evansville casino opened in October 2017.
Under the Indiana Act, riverboats that receive at least $75 million in adjusted gross receipts during the preceding state fiscal year (July 1 of one year through June 30 of the following year) are required to pay a graduated wagering tax. The term “adjusted gross receipts” (“AGR”) means the total of all cash and property received from gaming less cash paid out as winnings and uncollectible gaming receivables (not to exceed 2%). The rates are as follows:
15% of the first $25 million of AGR.
20% of AGR in excess of $25 million, but not exceeding $50 million.
25% of AGR in excess of $50 million, but not exceeding $75 million.
30% of AGR in excess of $75 million, but not exceeding $150 million.
35% of AGR in excess of $150 million, but not exceeding $600 million.
40% of AGR in excess of $600 million.
Riverboats that received less than $75 million of AGR are subject to the following graduated wagering tax based on their AGR in the subsequent fiscal year:
5% of the first $25 million of AGR.
20% of AGR in excess of $25 million, but not exceeding $50 million.
25% of AGR in excess of $50 million, but not exceeding $75 million.
30% of AGR in excess of $75 million, but not exceeding $150 million.
35% of AGR in excess of $150 million, but not exceeding $600 million.
40% of AGR in excess of $600 million.
In addition to the wagering tax above, any riverboat taxed at the lower rate that receives more than $75 million in AGR in a year is also required to pay an additional $2.5 million. Under a 2015 law, the French Lick casino is entitled to a credit against the wagering tax in amounts ranging from 10% to 50% of the amount payable if the casino’s AGR is less than $80 million. The 2015 legislation also provided that the graduated slot machine wagering tax paid by racinos is based on 88% of their AGR.
Under the Act, riverboats and racinos may deduct amounts attributable to qualified wagering from AGR. “Qualified wagering” refers to wagers made by patrons using noncashable vouchers, coupons, electronic credits, or electronic promotions provided by the riverboat. In 2015, the maximum amount of this deduction was increased from $5 million to $7 million.
The Indiana Act currently prescribes an admissions tax in the amount of $3 per patron for riverboats and a supplemental wagering tax at a rate of 3% of adjusted gross receipts for inland casinos. Starting July 1, 2019, the $3 per patron admissions tax for all riverboats will be replaced with a supplemental wagering tax calculated based on the riverboat’s admissions tax and adjusted gross receipts during fiscal year 2017. The rate is capped at 4% for fiscal year 2019 and 3.5% in fiscal years thereafter.
Real property taxes are imposed on riverboats at rates determined by local taxing authorities. Income to us from the Indiana casinos is subject to the Indiana adjusted gross income tax. Sales on a riverboat and at related resort facilities are subject to applicable use, excise and retail taxes. The Indiana Act requires a licensee to directly reimburse the Indiana Commission for the costs of inspectors and agents required to be present while authorized gaming is conducted.
Through the establishment of purchasing goals, the Indiana Act encourages minority and women’s business enterprise participation in the gaming industry. The Indiana Commission is required to establish annual goals for the use of minority and women business enterprises by a licensee. The goals must be derived from a statistical analysis of utilization study of licensee




contracts for goods and services. The Indiana Commission may suspend, limit or revoke the license or impose a fine for failure to comply with the statutory goals.
Minimum and maximum wagers on games on the riverboat are left to the discretion of the licensee. Wagering may not be conducted with money or other negotiable currency. There are no statutory restrictions on extending credit to patrons with the exception of persons participating in the voluntary exclusion program; however, the matter of credit continues to be a matter of potential legislative action.
If an institutional investor acquires 5% or more of any class of voting securities of a licensee (or a holding or intermediary company of a licensee), the investor is required to notify the Indiana Commission and to provide additional information, and may be subject to a finding of suitability. Institutional investors who acquire 15% or more of any class of voting securities are subject to a finding of suitability. In addition, the Indiana Commission may require an institutional investor that acquires 15% or more of certain non-voting equity units to apply for a finding of suitability. Any other person who acquires 5% or more of any class of voting securities of a licensee (or a holding or intermediary company of a licensee) is required to apply to the Indiana Commission for a finding of suitability.

A licensee or an affiliate may not enter into a debt transaction of $1,000,000 or more without approval of the Indiana Commission. The Indiana Commission has taken the position that a “debt transaction” includes increases in maximum amount available under revolving credit facilities. A licensee or any other person may not lease, hypothecate, borrow money against or loan money against or otherwise securitize a riverboat owner’s license. Indiana Commission regulations also require a licensee or affiliate to conduct due diligence to ensure that each person with whom the licensee or affiliate enters into a debt transaction would be suitable for licensure under the Indiana Act. The Indiana Commission rules require that:
a written request for approval of the debt transaction, along with relevant information regarding the debt transaction, be submitted to the Indiana Commission at least ten days prior to a scheduled meeting of the Indiana Commission;
a representative of the riverboat licensee be present at the meeting to answer any questions; and
a decision regarding the approval of the debt transaction be issued by the Indiana Commission at the next following meeting.
The Indiana Commission has adopted a resolution authorizing the Executive Director of the Indiana Commission to approve deviations from certain of these requirements with the approval of the chairperson of the Indiana Commission and a member who is a Certified Public Accountant. This approval is subject to ratification by the Indiana Commission.
A licensee, or its parent company, that is publicly traded must notify the Indiana Commission of a public offering that will be registered with the SEC. The licensee must notify the Indiana Commission within 10 business days of the initial filing of a registration statement with the SEC. An ownership interest in a licensee may only be transferred in accordance with the Indiana Act and rules promulgated thereunder.
The Indiana Commission has promulgated a rule that prohibits distributions, excluding distributions for the payment of state or federal taxes, by a licensee to its partners, shareholders, itself or any affiliated entity if the distribution would impair the financial viability of the riverboat gaming operation. The Indiana Commission has also promulgated a rule mandating licensees to maintain a cash reserve against defaults in gaming debts. The cash reserve must be equal to licensee’s average payout for a three-day period based on the riverboat’s performance the prior calendar quarter. The cash reserve can consist of cash on hand, cash maintained in Indiana bank accounts and cash equivalents not otherwise committed or obligated.
Iowa . The Company’s Council Bluffs operations are conducted by our wholly owned subsidiary, Ameristar Casino Council Bluffs, LLC (“ACCB”), and are subject to Chapter 99F of the Iowa Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder. ACCB’s gaming operations are subject to the licensing and regulatory control of the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission.
Under Iowa law, wagering on a “gambling game” is legal when conducted by a licensee on an “excursion gambling boat.” An “excursion gambling boat” is an excursion boat or moored barge on which lawful gambling is authorized and licensed. “Gambling game” means any game of chance authorized by the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission. In 2004, the Iowa legislature eliminated the mandatory cruising requirement for an “excursion gambling boat,” and ACCB’s riverboat is now classified as a “permanently moored vessel.”
The legislation permitting riverboat gaming in Iowa authorizes the granting of licenses to “qualified sponsoring organizations.” A “qualified sponsoring organization” is defined as a nonprofit corporation organized under the laws of the State of Iowa, or a person or association that can show to the satisfaction of the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission that the person or association is eligible for exemption from federal income taxation under Section 501(c)(3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8),




(10) or (19) of the Internal Revenue Code (hereinafter “not-for-profit corporation”). The not-for-profit corporation is permitted to enter into operating agreements with persons qualified to conduct riverboat gaming operations. Such operators must be approved and licensed by the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission. On January 27, 1995, the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission authorized the issuance of a license to conduct gambling games on an excursion gambling boat to Iowa West Racing Association (the “Association”), a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purpose of facilitating riverboat gaming in Council Bluffs. The Association has entered into a sponsorship agreement with ACCB (the “Operator’s Contract”) authorizing ACCB to operate riverboat gaming operations in Council Bluffs under the Association’s gaming license, and the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission has approved this contract. The initial term of the Operator’s Contract ran until March 31, 2015, and ACCB exercised an option to extend the term for an additional three-year period through March 31, 2018. In May 2017, the Association and ACCB extended the term of the Operator’s Contract through March 31, 2023.
Under Iowa law, a license to conduct gambling games in a county shall be issued only if the county electorate approves such gambling games. The electorate of Pottawattamie County, which includes the City of Council Bluffs, most recently reauthorized by referendum in November 2010 the gambling games conducted by ACCB. After a referendum has been held which approved or defeated a proposal to conduct gambling games, another referendum on a proposal to conduct gambling games shall not be held until the eighth calendar year thereafter. Each such referendum requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the persons voting thereon. However, if a proposition to operate gambling games is approved by a majority of the county electorate voting on the proposition in two successive elections, a subsequent submission and approval of a proposition shall not thereafter be required, unless the board of supervisors for that county receives a valid petition requesting a referendum to approve or disapprove the conduct of gambling games. In the event a future reauthorization referendum is defeated, the licenses granted to the Association and ACCB would be subject to renewal for a total of nine years from the date of original issue or one year from the date of the referendum disapproving the conduct of gambling games, whichever is later, unless the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission revokes a license at an earlier date, at which time ACCB would be required to cease conducting gambling games. The referendum in November 2010 was at least the second successive election approving the conduct of gambling games in Pottawattamie County.
Substantially all of ACCB’s material transactions are subject to review and approval by the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission. Written and oral contracts and business arrangements (1) involving a related party, (2) in which the term exceeds three years or (3) the total value in a calendar year exceeds $100,000 (regardless of payment method) are agreements that qualify for submission to and approval by the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission (“Qualifying Agreements”). However, contracts and business arrangements with manufacturers and distributors of gambling games or implements of gambling licensed by the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission pursuant to its rules are exempt from submission to and approval by the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission. Qualifying Agreements are limited to: (1) any obligation that expends, encumbers or loans facility assets to anyone other than a not-for-profit entity or a unit of government for the payment of taxes, , or an entity that provides water, sewer, gas, or electric utility services to the facility; (2) any disposal of facility assets or the provision of goods and services at less than market value to anyone other than a not-for-profit entity or a unit of government; (3) a previously approved Qualifying Agreement, if consideration exceeds the approved amount in a calendar year by the greater of $100,000 or 25% or if the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission approval date of an ongoing contract is more than five years old; and (4) any type of contract, regardless of value or term, where a third party provides electronic or mechanical access to cash or credit for a patron of the facility.
Each Qualifying Agreement must be submitted to the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission within 30 days of execution. Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission approval must be obtained prior to implementation, unless the Qualifying Agreement contains a written clause stating that the agreement is subject to Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission approval. Qualifying Agreements that are ongoing or open-ended need only be submitted on initiation, unless there is a material change in terms or noncompliance with the requirement that consideration be given to the use of Iowa resources, goods and services. Additionally, contracts negotiated between ACCB and a related party must be accompanied by economic and qualitative justification.
The Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission conducts reviews to serve the public interest to ensure that gaming is free from criminal and corruptive elements, that gaming-related funds are directed to the lawful recipient, and that gaming profits are not improperly distributed. Further, the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission conducts reviews to ensure that Iowa resources, goods and services are utilized. A facility shall be considered to have utilized a substantial amount of Iowa resources, goods, services and entertainment in compliance with Iowa law if the facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission that preference was given to the extent allowed by law and other competitive factors.
The Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission approves all Qualifying Agreements that, in the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission’s sole opinion, represent a normal business transaction. The Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission may impose conditions on an approval. The Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission may deny approval of any agreement that, in the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission’s sole opinion, represents a distribution of profits that differs from commission-approved ownership and beneficial interest.




ACCB is required to maintain records regarding its equity structure and owners. The Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission may require ACCB to submit background information on all persons participating in any capacity at ACCB. The Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission may suspend or revoke the license of a licensee if the licensee is found to be ineligible in any respect, such as want of character, moral fitness, or financial responsibility or due to failure to meet other criteria employed by the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission.
ACCB must submit detailed financial, operating and other reports to the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission. ACCB must file weekly gaming reports indicating adjusted gross receipts received from gambling games, the total number and amount of money received from admissions and the amount of regulatory fees paid. Additionally, ACCB must file annual financial statements covering all financial activities related to its operations for each fiscal year. ACCB must also submit the results of an independent network security risk assessment to the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission on a biennial basis.
Iowa has a graduated wagering tax equal to 5% of the first $1.0 million of annual adjusted gross receipts, 10% of the next $2.0 million of annual adjusted gross receipts and 22% of annual adjusted gross receipts over $3.0 million for an excursion gambling boat. “Adjusted Gross Receipts” is defined as the total sums wagered under Iowa Code Chapter 99F (“Gross Receipts”) less winnings paid to wagerers. In addition, the state charges other fees on a per-guest basis. The annual license fee to operate an excursion gambling boat is based on the passenger-carrying capacity including crew, for which the excursion gambling boat is registered. The annual fee shall be five dollars per person capacity. Additionally, ACCB pays the City of Council Bluffs a fee equal to $0.50 per passenger. Under the Operator’s Contract, ACCB also pays the Association a fee equal to 3% of adjusted gross receipts.
All persons participating in any capacity at a gaming facility, with the exception of certified law enforcement officers while they are working for the facility as uniformed officers, are required to obtain occupational licenses from the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission. All such licenses must be renewed every three years. The Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission has broad discretion to deny or revoke any occupational license.
If the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission decides that a gaming law or regulation has been violated, the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission has the power to assess fines, revoke or suspend licenses or to take any other action as may be reasonable or appropriate to enforce the gaming rules and regulations.
The Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission may approve a qualifying licensee’s debt transactions via a shelf application process. Licensees are eligible to make a shelf application where the parent company of the licensee has (1) a class of securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange or the National Association of Securities Dealers Automatic Quotation System (NASDAQ) or has stockholders’ equity in the amount of $15 million or more as reported in the parent company’s most recent report on Form 10-K or Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) immediately preceding application; and (2) filed all reports required by the SEC.  The Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission may grant approval of a shelf application for a period not to exceed three years. The Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission representative may rescind a shelf approval without prior written notice, and may lift the rescission upon the satisfaction of any such terms and conditions as required by the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission.
ACCB is subject to licensure by the Alcoholic Beverages Division (“ABD”) of the Iowa Department of Commerce, which administers and enforces the laws of the State of Iowa concerning alcoholic beverages. Additionally, ACCB is subject to liquor ordinances adopted by local authorities. A local authority may adopt ordinances governing establishments that are located within their jurisdiction. Local ordinances may be more restrictive than state law, but they may not conflict with state law. The ABD and the local authorities have full power to suspend or revoke any license for the serving of alcoholic beverages.
Louisiana. The ownership and operation of riverboat gaming facilities in Louisiana are subject to extensive regulation under the Louisiana Gaming Control Law, including the Louisiana Riverboat Economic Development and Gaming Control Act, and all applicable regulations (collectively, the “Louisiana Act”). The Louisiana Act also imposes certain restrictions upon the ownership and transfer of our securities and upon transactions that encumber our assets or those of our licensees and intermediate companies. The Louisiana Gaming Control Board (the “Board”) is the sole and exclusive regulatory and supervisory board for gaming operations and activities in Louisiana. The Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Office of State Police, Gaming Enforcement Section (the “Division”) provides investigatory, regulatory, and enforcement services to the Board in the implementation, administration, and enforcement of the Louisiana Act. The Louisiana Attorney General acts as legal counsel to the Board.
The Louisiana Act is based upon the public policy declarations that the development of a controlled gaming industry to promote economic development requires thorough and careful exercise of legislative power to protect the general welfare of the people by keeping the state free from criminal and corrupt elements. The Louisiana Act thus seeks, among other things, to (i) prevent unsavory or unsuitable persons from having any direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity; (ii) establish and maintain responsible accounting practices and procedures; (iii) maintain effective control over the




financial practices of licensees, including establishing procedures for reliable record keeping and making periodic reports to the gaming authorities; (iv) prevent cheating and fraudulent practices; (v) develop and implement comprehensive compulsive and problem gambling programs; (vi) provide a source of state and local revenues through fees; (vii) ensure that gaming licensees utilize Louisiana resources, goods, and services in the operation and construction of riverboat gaming facilities to the extent allowable by law; and (viii) ensure that gaming licensees recruit, train, and upgrade minorities in all employment classifications and provide for the inclusion of minority-owned businesses to the maximum extent practicable.
The Board is responsible for issuing gaming licenses and is empowered to issue up to fifteen licenses to conduct gaming activities on riverboats in accordance with applicable law. However, no more than six licenses may be granted to riverboats operating from any one designated waterway. The Louisiana Act provides that an initial license to conduct gaming operations is valid for a term of five years and may be renewed for successive five year terms after the initial term upon application and continued satisfaction of suitability standards and other provisions of the Louisiana Act.
Through certain subsidiaries, we currently hold four riverboat gaming licenses in Louisiana: (i) Louisiana-I Gaming, a Partnership in Commendam, the operator of Boomtown New Orleans, which license expires March 22, 2020, subject to renewal; (ii) PNK (Bossier City), L.L.C., the operator of Boomtown Bossier City, which license expires November 28, 2019, subject to renewal; (iii) PNK (Lake Charles), L.L.C., the operator of L’Auberge Lake Charles, which license expires April 19, 2022, subject to renewal; and (iv) PNK (Baton Rouge) Partnership, the operator of L’Auberge Casino & Hotel Baton Rouge, which license expires August 19, 2019, subject to renewal. All licensees are subject to the specific conditions imposed on the license, including conditions related to employment of and procurement from Louisiana businesses, residents, women, and minorities, and to all applicable provisions of the Louisiana Act, including requirements that a licensed riverboat gaming vessel be berthed upon a designated river or waterway, that the vessel replicate as nearly as practicable historic Louisiana river borne steamboat passenger vessels of the nineteenth century era, and that the vessel be paddlewheel driven. All licensed riverboat gaming vessels are subject to periodic inspection and/or certification by the United States Coast Guard (in the case of certificated vessels) or by the Board-appointed third-party inspector and by the licensee (in the case of non-certificated vessels), all in accordance with the Louisiana Act. The riverboat gaming vessels operated by licensees Louisiana-I Gaming, PNK (Bossier City), L.L.C., PNK (Lake Charles), L.L.C., and PNK (Baton Rouge) Partnership are non-certificated vessels within the meaning of the Act and have been issued certificates of compliance by the Board upon certification by the Board-appointed third-party inspector, currently ABS Consulting, Inc.
A gaming license is deemed to be a pure and absolute revocable privilege under the Louisiana Act, and not a right. As such, a gaming license may be denied, revoked, suspended, conditioned, or limited at any time by the Board. To issue a license, the Board must find that the applicant has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that such applicant is suitable, which requires submission of detailed personal and financial information followed by a thorough investigation. Pursuant to the Louisiana Act, “suitable” means that the applicant (i) is a person of good character, honesty, and integrity; (ii) is a person whose prior activities, criminal record, if any, reputation, habits and associations do not pose a threat to the public interest of the State of Louisiana or to the effective regulation and control of gaming, or create or enhance the dangers of unsuitable, unfair, or illegal practices, methods, and activities in the conduct of gaming or the carrying on of business and financial arrangements in connection therewith; (iii) is capable of and likely to conduct the activities for which such applicant is licensed pursuant to the Louisiana Act; and (iv) is not otherwise disqualified pursuant to the Louisiana Act. In addition, the applicant must satisfy the specific requirements for the initial issuance of a license, as set forth in the Louisiana Act. Pinnacle and each of its licensees must maintain suitability throughout the term of the license and any renewal terms. In addition, other persons may be subject to the suitability standards of the Louisiana Act and may be required to hold certain permits under the Louisiana Act, including without limitation the following: (i) certain of our and the licensee’s officers, directors, key gaming employees, and non-key gaming employees; (ii) persons who manufacture any gaming device, supplies, or equipment for use under the provisions of the Louisiana Act; (iii) persons who supply, sell, lease, or repair, or contract to supply, sell, lease, or repair gaming devices, equipment, and supplies to a licensee; and (iv) subject to certain exemptions from the permit requirement as set forth in the Act, persons who furnish nongaming services or goods to a licensee and receive compensation or remuneration in excess of two hundred thousand dollars per calendar year for such goods or services. The gaming authorities in their discretion, however, may require additional persons to file applications for permits or findings of suitability.
Pinnacle and each of its licensees have a continuing duty to inform the gaming authorities of any possible violation of the Louisiana Act and to notify the Division of any fact, event, occurrence, matter or action that may affect the conduct of gaming or the business and financial arrangements incidental thereto or the ability to conduct the activities for which the licensee or permittee is licensed or permitted.
Pinnacle’s licensees may conduct gaming operations only in accordance with the terms of the license, including the specific conditions imposed by the Board on each license, and also must comply with all restrictions and conditions relating to the operation of riverboat gaming, as specified in the Louisiana Act, including provisions governing location of berth sites, riverboat design and inspection, gaming space, rules and odds of authorized games, and permitted devices. The Louisiana Act




was amended in 2001 to provide, with exceptions not applicable to the location of any of Pinnacle’s licensees, that gaming may only be conducted on a riverboat while it is docked and that the licensee shall not conduct cruises or excursions. The Louisiana Act also prescribes grounds for the revocation, limitation, or suspension of licenses or permits, which may include failure to comply with license conditions, and grounds for imposition of civil penalties. If a licensee holds more than one license and has a license suspended or revoked, the Board may suspend or revoke all licenses. In addition, the Division may take enforcement action against Pinnacle, a licensee, or other person who has been disciplined in another jurisdiction for gaming related activity.
A licensee must periodically report the following information to the gaming authorities, which is not confidential and is to be available for public inspection: (i) the licensee’s net gaming proceeds from all authorized games; (ii) the amount of net gaming proceeds tax paid; and, (iii) all quarterly and annual financial statements presenting historical data that are submitted to the gaming authorities, including annual financial statements that have been audited by an independent certified public accountant. An annual license fee is payable to the State of Louisiana in the amount of $50,000 for each riverboat for the first year of operation and $100,000 for each year thereafter. In addition, Louisiana riverboat gaming facilities are subject to annual license and franchise fees in the amount of 21.5% of net gaming proceeds. The local governing authority of the parish or municipality in which the licensed berth of a riverboat is located may also levy certain admission fees, computed in various ways as provided by the Louisiana Act. As to Boomtown Bossier City, the Louisiana Act establishes that the admission fee for any riverboat located within Bossier City in Bossier Parish shall be four and five-tenths percent of monthly net gaming proceeds. For Boomtown New Orleans, the Louisiana Act provides that the admission fee for any riverboat licensed to operate within the unincorporated area of Jefferson Parish on the West Bank of the Mississippi River shall be six percent of weekly net gaming proceeds. As to L’Auberge Lake Charles, the Louisiana Act provides that the local governing authority in Calcasieu Parish may, in lieu of the admission fee, levy a fee not to exceed four and five-tenths percent of the monthly net gaming proceeds, which fee shall be established by contract between the governing authority and the licensee. As to L’Auberge Casino & Hotel Baton Rouge, the Louisiana Act also provides that the local governing authority may, in lieu of the admission fee, levy a fee not to exceed four and five-tenths percent of the monthly net gaming proceeds, which fee shall be established by contract between the governing authority and the licensee.
The transfer of a license or an interest in a license is prohibited. The sale, assignment, transfer, pledge, or disposition of a security or securities that represent 5% or more of the total outstanding shares issued by a corporation that holds a license is conditional and ineffective if disapproved by the Division. Except as otherwise provided by the Louisiana Act, the prior written approval of the Board or Division is required for the transfer of the following interests: (i) other than the transfer of securities in a publicly traded corporation, an ownership or economic interest of 5% or more in any licensee or permittee; (ii) other than the transfer of securities in a publicly traded corporation, an ownership or economic interest of 5% or more in any person required to meet the qualification and suitability requirements of the Louisiana Act; (iii) a transaction that results in a change of control of a licensee or permittee; or (iv) a transaction in which a person acquires control of a licensee or permittee. The acquisition of an ownership or economic interest in a licensee or permittee, other than those listed above, is conditional and ineffective if subsequently disapproved by the Board or Division. These requirements also apply should an accumulation of transfers occur wherein 5% or more ownership interest or economic interest or such other interest that otherwise leads to a change of control in a licensee or permittee is transferred. The licensee or permittee shall provide notice to the Board and the Division within 5 days of obtaining knowledge of the accumulation of an ownership interest of 5% or more of any class of publicly traded voting securities of the licensee or permittee or an affiliate.
No transfer of interest for which prior approval is required may be completed unless the transfer and proposed transferee have been approved, in writing, by the Board, and any such transfer that occurs without the prior approval of the Board is void and without effect. Failure to obtain prior approval as required may be grounds for administrative action against a licensee or permittee, including license revocation.
Any person who has or controls directly or indirectly 5% or more ownership, income, or profit or economic interest in an entity which has or applies for a license or permit, or who receives 5% or more revenue interest related to the gaming operation, or who has the ability or capacity to exercise significant influence over the activities of an applicant, licensee, casino operator, or permittee shall be required to submit to an investigation to determine suitability. An applicant, licensee, or permittee, and officers, directors, and any person having a 5% or more economic interest in such entities shall be required to submit to an investigation to determine suitability, unless otherwise exempted. Moreover, each person, other than an “institutional investor” as defined in the Louisiana Act, who individually, or in association with others, acquires an ownership or economic interest of 5% or more of any class of publicly traded voting securities of a licensee or permittee or an affiliate shall submit all required applications to the Board or Division for a determination of qualification and suitability, and must do so within 30 days of acquisition of the securities.
Under certain circumstances, an “institutional investor” or an “institutional lender” otherwise required to be found suitable or qualified shall be presumed suitable or qualified upon submitting documentation sufficient to establish qualifications as an institutional investor or as an institutional lender, each as defined in the Louisiana Act. However, under the Louisiana Act, an




investor or group of investors purchasing debt securities of a licensee or permittee (or their subsidiaries) constituting more than 20% of the total debt or 50% of a material debt issue may not qualify as an institutional lender unless otherwise approved by the Board, so as not to give such investor(s) the ability to control a licensee or permittee. Notwithstanding presumptions of suitability, the Board may investigate the suitability or qualifications of an institutional investor or institutional lender should the Board or the Division become aware of facts or information which may result in such institutional investor or institutional lender being found unsuitable or disqualified.
The Louisiana Act provides that an institutional investor also must certify that (i) it owns, holds, or controls publicly traded securities of a licensee, permittee or holding, intermediate or parent company of a licensee or permittee in the ordinary course of business for investment purposes only; (ii) it does not exercise influence over the affairs of the issuer of such securities nor over any licensed or permitted subsidiary of the issuer of such securities; and (iii) it does not intend to exercise influence over the affairs of the issuer of such securities, nor over any licensed or permitted subsidiary of the issuer of such securities, in the future, and that it agrees to notify the Board in writing within thirty days if such intent should change. An institutional investor has a continuing obligation to update and renew the certification required by the Louisiana Act. An institutional investor who individually, or in association with others, acquires an ownership or economic interest of 5% or more of any class of publicly traded voting securities of a licensee, permittee, or an affiliate shall notify the Board or Division within 10 business days after the acquisition. Upon receipt, the Division will determine if the institutional investor previously has submitted the required certification. The Division has interpreted the certification requirements imposed upon institutional investors by the Louisiana Act to apply as well to institutional lenders. The exercise of voting privileges with regard to publicly traded securities shall not be deemed to constitute the exercise of influence over the affairs of a licensee.
If the Board finds that the holder of a publicly traded security of a licensee, permittee, or an affiliate is not qualified and suitable, the holder of the security shall not receive dividends or interest on the security, exercise directly or indirectly any right conferred by the security, receive any remuneration or economic benefit or continue in ownership of the security. Within 30 days of the finding that the holder is not qualified and suitable, the issuer of the security shall purchase the security from the holder for the lesser of the current fair market value or the original purchase price. If the Division finds that the individual owner or holder of a security of a corporate licensee or of a holding or an intermediary company or any person or persons with an economic interest in a licensee, or a director, partner, officer, or manager is not qualified under the Louisiana Act, and if as a result the licensee is no longer qualified to continue as a licensee, the Division shall propose action necessary to protect the public interest, including the suspension or revocation of the license or permit.
In addition to its obligation to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Board periodically, a licensee or an affiliate, as defined by the Act, must notify the Board and obtain prior written approval before entering into a debt transaction, which includes (i) loans, lines of credit or similar financing; (ii) public and private debt offerings; or (iii) any transaction that provides guarantees, grants a form of security, or encumbers assets of the licensee, casino operator or casino manager or affiliate. Exceptions to the requirement of prior written approval include, without limitation, transactions not exceeding $2,500,000 in which all of the lenders are qualified institutional lenders pursuant to the Louisiana Act; transactions that do not substantially modify or alter the terms of an existing, previously approved debt transaction; transactions involving securities to be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and sold pursuant to an underwriters’ agreement; transactions involving private placement offerings with registration rights under Rule 144A and Regulation S promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and sold pursuant to a purchase agreement with initial purchasers; or transactions qualifying under a shelf approval pursuant to the Louisiana Act. Transactions under a shelf approval, transactions involving publicly registered securities, and transactions involving private placement offerings with registration rights are, however, subject to certain notice and reporting requirements. The Board may rescind a shelf approval without prior written notice.
If it should be determined that the Louisiana Act or license conditions have been violated by us or any of our Louisiana subsidiaries holding riverboat gaming licenses, the Board could revoke, suspend, limit, or condition the licenses, subject to compliance with certain statutory and regulatory procedures. In addition, we, the Louisiana subsidiaries holding riverboat gaming licenses, and the persons involved in any violations of the Louisiana Act could be subject to substantial fines for each separate violation of the Louisiana Act at the discretion of the Board or Division. To the extent a decision of the Board is appealable, such appeal may be made to the 19th Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana.
Certain related Louisiana legislation required statewide local elections on a parish-by-parish basis to determine whether to prohibit or continue to permit licensed riverboat gaming. The applicable local elections have occurred in all parishes in which we operate riverboat gaming facilities, and the voters in those parishes voted to continue licensed riverboat gaming. However, it is noteworthy that the current legislation does not provide for any moratorium on future local elections on gaming.
Missouri . On November 3, 1992, the voters approved a statewide referendum which legalized gaming in the State of Missouri. The Missouri Constitution, statutes and regulations (“Missouri Gaming Law”) allow games of chance and skill to be conducted on excursion gambling boats, ferries or floating facilities located up to 1,000 feet from the Mississippi River or




Missouri Rivers. The Missouri Gaming Commission (“MGC”) licenses and regulates gaming. There are currently thirteen licensed gaming facility sites in Missouri, the maximum number allowed by the Missouri Gaming Law: one in Caruthersville; one in Cape Girardeau; one in Boonville; four in the St. Louis area; four in the Kansas City area; one in LaGrange; and one in St. Joseph. The Missouri Gaming Commission has authorized all thirteen licensed sites to operate all or a portion of their facilities on a continuously docked basis.
Pinnacle is licensed in Missouri as a “key person” business entity (which includes individuals and companies designated by the MGC) for Ameristar Casino St. Charles, LLC (“ACSC”), Ameristar Casino Kansas City, LLC (“ACKC”), and PNK (River City), LLC (“River City”). As a key person business entity, Pinnacle was licensed and regulated by the MGC, and its ability to engage in certain transactions was restricted.
Pinnacle holds a Class A License and is the Class A Licensee for ACKC, ACSC, and River City, each of which holds a Class B License.
Pinnacle is a publicly traded corporation that is the Class A Licensee of the Missouri Class B Licensees. Pinnacle MLS, LLC is a holding company that will be the parent entity of ACSC, ACKC and River City. Neither Pinnacle nor Pinnacle MLS, LLC own or lease any real estate assets used in the gaming operations of the Missouri Class B Licensees. Pinnacle leases the real property on which the Missouri Class B Licensees are operated under a master lease agreement between GLPI Merger Sub, LLC and Pinnacle MLS, LLC.
Under the Missouri Gaming Law, the ownership and operation of riverboat gaming facilities in Missouri are subject to extensive state and local regulation. After the receipt of licensing approval from and in the discretion of the MGC, the continuing operations of River City, ACKC or ACSC, any subsidiaries, and some of their officers and employees are and will be subject to specific regulations, including ongoing licensing requirements. As part of the application and licensing process for a gaming license, the applicant must submit detailed financial, operating and other reports to the MGC. Each applicant has an ongoing duty to update the information provided to the MGC in the application, usually within seven days of a material change in the information on file with the Commission. River City, ACKC or ACSC frequently update their respective application materials for the Class B License. In addition to the information required of the applicant, directors, officers, affiliated business entities and other defined “key persons” (which include individuals and companies designated by the MGC) must submit Personal Disclosure Forms, which include detailed financial information, and are subject to thorough investigations. In addition, we and some of our officers and directors have submitted Personal Disclosure Forms and applications to the MGC. All gaming employees must obtain an occupational license issued by the MGC. Suppliers are also subject to licensing requirements of the MGC. Pinnacle must obtain advance approval of the MGC to enter into any contract or arrangement, whereby a person or group of persons acting in concert (a) owns, controls, or has power to vote 25 percent or more of the ownership interest in Pinnacle, River City, ACKC or ACSC or (b) controls the election of a majority of the directors or managers of Pinnacle, River City, ACKC or ACSC.
The Class A (parent organization or controlling entity) and Class B (operator of the gaming facility) licenses are issued through application to the MGC, which requires, among other things:
passing suitability investigations into an applicant’s character, financial responsibility, experience, and qualifications;
passing suitability investigations into each designated key person or affiliated business entity’s character, financial responsibility, experience and qualifications;
disclosing required financial (see above) and other personal information on each key person or designated affiliated business entity;
disclosing detailed information about the applicant’s history, business, affiliations, officers, directors and owners;
having an approved affirmative action plan for the hiring and training of minorities and women; and
submitting an acceptable economic development or impact report.
The Missouri Gaming Law and implementing regulations impose restrictions on the use of the gaming licenses as well and limitations on transactions engaged in by licensees. Licenses may not be transferred nor pledged as collateral. The Missouri Gaming Law regulations bar a licensee from taking any of the following actions without prior notice to the MGC, after which notice the MGC may reopen and reconsider the licensee’s suitability under the Missouri Gaming Law:
any transfer or issuance of an ownership interest in a gaming licensee that is not a publicly held company;




any transfer or issuance of an ownership interest of five percent or more of the issued and outstanding ownership interest of a company which is publicly traded and is a holding company;
any private incurrence of debt by the licensee or any holding company of $1,000,000 or more;
any public issuance of debt by a licensee or its holding company; and
defined “significant related party transactions.”
In addition, the licensee must notify the MGC of other transactions that include the transfer of five percent or more of an ownership interest in the licensee or holding company if publicly held and any transaction of at least $1,000,000.
The restrictions on transfer of licenses and ownership interest apply to Pinnacle, River City, ACKC, and ACSC. Gaming equipment may not be pledged unless special conditions are complied with where possession is limited to defined licensed entities. Corporate stock of some licensees may not be pledged except in narrow circumstances and subject to regulatory conditions following notification to the MGC.
Missouri statutes and administrative rules contain detailed requirements and conditions concerning the operation of licensed excursion gaming boat facilities, including, but not limited to the following:
a charge of two dollars per gaming customer per excursion that licensees must either collect from each customer or pay itself to the MGC;
minimum payouts;
the payment of a 21% tax on adjusted gross receipts;
the amount of credit that may be extended to gaming customers;
the use of credit cards and the cashing of checks by customers;
providing security on the excursion gambling boat, including a requirement that each licensee reimburse the MGC for all costs of any MGC staff, including Missouri Highway Patrol Officers necessary to protect the public on the licensee’s riverboat;
the receipt of liquor licenses from the MGC and local jurisdictions; and
the adoption of minimum control standards for the conduct of gaming and the operation of the facility approved by the MGC.
The MGC has the power, as well as broad discretion in exercising this power, to revoke or suspend gaming or occupational licenses and impose other penalties for violations of the Missouri Gaming Law and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, including without limitation, forfeiture of all gaming equipment used for improper gaming and fines of up to three times a licensee’s highest daily gross receipts during the preceding twelve months.

Although the Missouri Gaming Law provides no limit on the amount of riverboat space that may be used for gaming, the MGC is empowered to impose space limitations through the adoption of rules and regulations.
The MGC does not impose loss limits and the MGC lacks authority to establish any regulations or policies that limit the amount of wagers, losses, or buy-in amounts.
Specifically, Proposition A, which was a ballot referendum: (1) repealed the maximum loss limit for gambling; (2) repealed the current individual maximum loss limit for gambling; (3) prohibited any future loss limits; (4) required identification to enter the gambling area only if necessary to establish that an individual is at least 21 years old; (5) restricted the number of casinos to those already built or being built; (6) increased the casino gambling tax from 20% to 21%; (7) created a new specific education fund from additional gambling tax proceeds generated as a result of this measure called the “Schools First Elementary and Secondary Education Improvement Fund”; and (8) required annual audits of this new fund.
The sale and use of alcoholic beverages upon gaming facilities or facilities immediately adjacent to them is subject to strict licensing, control and regulation by the MGC. The MGC has full power to limit, condition, suspend or revoke any such license.
There are currently no Missouri Gaming Laws or other laws that impose restrictions on smoking at gaming facilities. There is no guarantee that the laws will not change in the future. Any such laws would be subject to legal challenge.




Mississippi. The ownership and operation of casino gaming facilities in the State of Mississippi, such as those at Ameristar Casino Vicksburg, are subject to extensive state and local regulation, but primarily the licensing and regulatory control of the Mississippi Gaming Commission, or the Mississippi Commission.
The Mississippi Gaming Control Act, or the Mississippi Act, is similar to the Nevada Gaming Control Act. The Mississippi Commission has adopted regulations that are also similar in many respects to the Nevada gaming regulations.
The laws, regulations and supervisory procedures of the Mississippi Commission are based upon declarations of public policy that are concerned with, among other things:
the prevention of unsavory or unsuitable persons from having a direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity;
the establishment and maintenance of responsible accounting practices and procedures;
the maintenance of effective controls over the financial practices of licensees, including the establishment of minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets and revenues, providing for reliable record keeping and requiring the filing of periodic reports with the Mississippi Commission;
the prevention of cheating and fraudulent practices;
providing a source of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees; and
ensuring that gaming licensees, to the extent practicable, employ Mississippi residents.
The regulations are subject to amendment and interpretation by the Mississippi Commission. We believe that our compliance with the licensing procedures and regulatory requirements of the Mississippi Commission will not affect the marketability of our securities. Changes in Mississippi laws or regulations may limit or otherwise materially affect the types of gaming that may be conducted and such changes, if enacted, could have an adverse effect on us and our business, financial condition and results of operations.  
The Mississippi Act provides for legalized gaming in each of the fourteen counties that border the Mississippi Gulf Coast or the Mississippi River, but only if the voters in the county have not voted to prohibit gaming in that county.
Currently, gaming is permissible in nine of the fourteen eligible counties in the state and gaming operations are currently conducted in seven of those counties. Traditionally, Mississippi law required gaming vessels to be located on the Mississippi River or on navigable waters in eligible counties along the Mississippi River, or in the waters lying south of the counties along the Mississippi Gulf Coast. However, the Mississippi Legislature amended the Mississippi Act to permit licensees in the three counties along the Gulf Coast to establish casino structures that are located in whole or part on shore and land-based casino operations provided the land-based gaming areas do not extend more than 800 feet beyond the nineteen-year mean high water line, except in Harrison County where the 800-foot limit can be extended as far as the greater of 800 feet beyond the 19 year mean high water line or the southern boundary of Highway 90. Due to another change in the interpretation of the Mississippi Act, the Commission has also permitted licensees in approved Mississippi River counties to conduct gaming operations on permanent structures, provided that the majority of the gaming floor in any such structure is located on the river side of the “bank full” line of the Mississippi River. Our Ameristar Casino Vicksburg casino is built on permanent structures located in a specially constructed dry-dock basin adjacent to the Mississippi River.
The Mississippi Act permits unlimited stakes gaming on a 24-hour basis and does not restrict the percentage of space which may be utilized for gaming. The Mississippi Act permits substantially all traditional casino games and gaming devices.
We and any subsidiary of ours that operates a casino in Mississippi, which we refer to as a Gaming Subsidiary, are subject to the licensing and regulatory control of the Mississippi Commission. We are registered under the Mississippi Act as a publicly traded corporation, or a Registered Corporation, of PNK Vicksburg, LLC, the owner and operator of Ameristar Casino Vicksburg, a licensee of the Mississippi Commission. As a Registered Corporation, we are required periodically to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Mississippi Commission and furnish any other information the Mississippi Commission may require. If we are unable to continue to satisfy the registration requirements of the Mississippi Act, we and any Gaming Subsidiary cannot own or operate gaming facilities in Mississippi. No person may become a stockholder of or receive any percentage of profits from a licensed subsidiary of a Registered Corporation without first obtaining licenses and approvals from the Mississippi Commission. We have obtained such approvals in connection with our ownership of Ameristar Casino Vicksburg.




A Gaming Subsidiary must maintain a gaming license from the Mississippi Commission to operate a casino in Mississippi. Such licenses are issued by the Mississippi Commission subject to certain conditions, including continued compliance with all applicable state laws and regulations. There are no limitations on the number of gaming licenses that may be issued in Mississippi. Gaming licenses require the payment of periodic fees and taxes, are not transferable, are issued for a three-year period and must be renewed periodically thereafter. Ameristar Casino Vicksburg’s gaming license expires on April 21, 2019.
Certain of our officers and employees and the officers, directors and certain key employees of Ameristar Casino Vicksburg must be found suitable or approved by the Mississippi Commission. We believe that we have obtained, applied for or are in the process of applying for all necessary findings of suitability with respect to us and Ameristar Casino Vicksburg, although the Mississippi Commission, in its discretion, may require additional persons to file applications for findings of suitability. In addition, any person having a material relationship or involvement with us may be required to be found suitable, in which case those persons must pay the costs and fees associated with such investigation. The Mississippi Commission may deny an application for a finding of suitability for any cause that it deems reasonable. Changes in certain licensed positions must be reported to the Mississippi Commission. In addition to its authority to deny an application for a finding of suitability, the Mississippi Commission has jurisdiction to disapprove a change in any corporate position or title and such changes must be reported to the Mississippi Commission. The Mississippi Commission has the power to require us and any Gaming Subsidiary to suspend or dismiss officers, directors and other key employees or sever relationships with other persons who refuse to file appropriate applications or whom the authorities find unsuitable to act in such capacities. Determinations of suitability or questions pertaining to licensing are not subject to judicial review in Mississippi.
At any time, the Mississippi Commission has the power to investigate and require the finding of suitability of any record or beneficial stockholder of Pinnacle. The Mississippi Act requires any person who acquires more than five percent of any class of voting securities of a Registered Corporation, as reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, to report the acquisition to the Mississippi Commission, and such person may be required to be found suitable. Also, any person who becomes a beneficial owner of more than ten percent of any class of voting securities of a Registered Corporation, as reported to the SEC, must apply for a finding of suitability by the Mississippi Commission and must pay the costs and fees that the Mississippi Commission incurs in conducting the investigation. If a stockholder who must be found suitable is a corporation, partnership or trust, it must submit detailed business and financial information including a list of beneficial owners.
The Mississippi Commission generally has exercised its discretion to require a finding of suitability of any beneficial owner of five percent or more of any class of voting securities of a Registered Corporation. However, under certain circumstances, an “institutional investor,” as defined in the Mississippi Commission’s regulations, which acquires more than ten percent, but not more than twenty-five percent, of the voting securities of a Registered Corporation may apply to the Mississippi Commission for a waiver of such finding of suitability if such institutional investor holds the voting securities for investment purposes only. An institutional investor shall not be deemed to hold voting securities for investment purposes unless the voting securities were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business as an institutional investor and not for the purpose of causing, directly or indirectly, the election of a majority of the members of the board of directors of the Registered Corporation, any change in the corporate charter, bylaws, management, policies or operations, or any of its gaming affiliates, or any other action which the Mississippi Commission finds to be inconsistent with holding the voting securities for investment purposes only. Activities which are not deemed to be inconsistent with holding voting securities for investment purposes include:
voting on all matters voted on by stockholders;
making financial and other inquiries of management of the type normally made by securities analysts for informational purposes and not to cause a change in management, policies or operations; and
such other activities as the Mississippi Commission may determine to be consistent with such investment intent.

Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within thirty days after being ordered to do so by the Mississippi Commission may be found unsuitable. The same restrictions apply to a record owner of our securities if the record owner, after request, fails to identify the beneficial owner. Any person found unsuitable and who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of our securities beyond such time as the Mississippi Commission prescribes, may be guilty of a misdemeanor. We may be subject to disciplinary action if, after receiving notice that a person is unsuitable to be a stockholder or to have any other relationship with us or any Gaming Subsidiary owned by us, the company involved:
pays the unsuitable person any dividend or other distribution upon such person's voting securities;
recognizes the exercise, directly or indirectly, of any voting rights conferred by securities held by the unsuitable person;




pays the unsuitable person any remuneration in any form for services rendered or otherwise, except in certain limited and specific circumstances; or
fails to pursue all lawful efforts to require the unsuitable person to divest himself of the securities, including, if necessary, the immediate purchase of the securities for cash at a fair market value.

We may be required to disclose to the Mississippi Commission, upon request, the identities of the holders of our debt or other securities. In addition, under the Mississippi Act, the Mississippi Commission, in its discretion, may require the holder of any debt security of a Registered Corporation to file an application, be investigated and be found suitable to own the debt security if the Mississippi Commission has reason to believe that the ownership of the debt security by the holder would be inconsistent with the declared policies of the State of Mississippi.
Although the Mississippi Commission generally does not require the individual holders of obligations such as notes to be investigated and found suitable, the Mississippi Commission retains the discretion to do so for any reason, including but not limited to, a default, or where the holder of the debt instruments exercises a material influence over the gaming operations of the entity in question. Any holder of debt securities required to apply for a finding of suitability must pay all investigative fees and costs of the Mississippi Commission in connection with such an investigation.
If the Mississippi Commission determines that a person is unsuitable to own a debt security, then the Registered Corporation maybe sanctioned, including the loss of its approvals, if without the prior approval of the Mississippi Commission, it:
pays to the unsuitable person any dividend, interest, or any distribution whatsoever;
recognizes any voting right by the unsuitable person in connection with those securities;
pays the unsuitable person remuneration in any form; or
makes any payment to the unsuitable person by way of principal, redemption, conversion, exchange, liquidation, or similar transaction.

Each Gaming Subsidiary must maintain in Mississippi a current ledger with respect to the ownership of its equity securities, and we must maintain in Mississippi a current list of our stockholders which must reflect the record ownership of each outstanding share of any class of our equity securities. The ledger and stockholder lists must be available for inspection by the Mississippi Commission at any time. If any securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to the Mississippi Commission. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable. We must also render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the beneficial owner.
The Mississippi Act requires that the certificates representing securities of a Registered Corporation bear a legend indicating that the securities are subject to the Mississippi Act and the regulations of the Mississippi Commission. We have received from the Mississippi Commission a waiver of this legend requirement. The Mississippi Commission has the power to impose additional restrictions on the holders of our securities at any time.
Substantially all material loans, leases, sales of securities and similar financing transactions by a Registered Corporation or a Gaming Subsidiary must be reported to or approved by the Mississippi Commission. A Gaming Subsidiary may not make a public offering of its securities but may pledge or mortgage casino facilities. A Registered Corporation may not make a public offering of its securities without the prior approval of the Mississippi Commission if any part of the proceeds of the offering is to be used to finance the construction, acquisition or operation of gaming facilities in Mississippi or to retire or extend obligations incurred for those purposes. Such approval, if given, does not constitute a recommendation or approval of the investment merits of the securities subject to the offering. We have received a waiver of the prior approval requirement with respect to public offerings and private placements of securities, subject to certain conditions, including the ability of the Mississippi Commission to issue a stop order with respect to any such offering if the staff determines it would be necessary to do so.
Under the regulations of the Mississippi Commission, a Gaming Subsidiary may not guarantee a security issued by an affiliated company pursuant to a public offering, or pledge its assets to secure payment or performance of the obligations evidenced by the security issued by the affiliated company, without the prior approval of the Mississippi Commission. A pledge of the stock of a Gaming Subsidiary and the foreclosure of such a pledge are ineffective without the prior approval of the Mississippi Commission. Moreover, restrictions on the transfer of an equity security issued by a Gaming Subsidiary or its holding companies and agreements not to encumber such securities are ineffective without the prior approval of the Mississippi Commission. We have obtained approvals from the Mississippi Commission for such guarantees, pledges and restrictions in




connection with offerings of securities, subject to certain restrictions, but we must obtain separate prior approvals from the Mississippi Commission for pledges and stock restrictions in connection with certain financing transactions. Moreover, the regulations of the Mississippi Commission require us to file a Loan to Licensees and Lease Transaction Report with the Mississippi Gaming Commission within thirty (30) days following certain financing transactions and the offering of certain debt securities. If the Mississippi Commission were to deem it appropriate, the Mississippi Commission could order any such transaction rescinded.
Changes in control of us through merger, consolidation, acquisition of assets, management or consulting agreements or any act or conduct by a person by which he or she obtains control may not occur without the prior approval of the Mississippi Commission. Entities seeking to acquire control of a Registered Corporation must satisfy the Mississippi Commission in a variety of stringent standards prior to assuming control of the Registered Corporation. The Mississippi Commission also may require controlling stockholders, officers, directors, and other persons having a material relationship or involvement with the entity proposing to acquire control to be investigated and found suitable as part of the approval process relating to the transaction.  
The Mississippi legislature has declared that some corporate acquisitions opposed by management, repurchases of voting securities and other corporate defense tactics that affect corporate gaming licensees in Mississippi and Registered Corporations may be injurious to stable and productive corporate gaming. The Mississippi Commission has established a regulatory scheme to ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of these business practices upon Mississippi’s gaming industry and further Mississippi’s policy to:  
assure the financial stability of corporate gaming operators and their affiliates;
preserve the beneficial aspects of conducting business in the corporate form; and
promote a neutral environment for the orderly governance of corporate affairs.

Approvals are, in certain circumstances, required from the Mississippi Commission before a Registered Corporation may make exceptional repurchases of voting securities (such as repurchases which treat holders differently) in excess of the current market price and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management can be consummated. Mississippi’s gaming regulations also require prior approval by the Mississippi Commission of a plan of recapitalization proposed by the Registered Corporation’s board of directors in response to a tender offer made directly to the Registered Corporation’s shareholders for the purpose of acquiring control of the Registered Corporation.  
Neither we nor any Gaming Subsidiary may engage in gaming activities in Mississippi while also conducting gaming operations outside of Mississippi without approval of, or a waiver of such approval by, the Mississippi Commission. The Mississippi Commission may require determinations that, among other things, there are means for the Mississippi Commission to have access to information concerning the out-of-state gaming operations of us and our affiliates. We previously have obtained, or otherwise qualified for, a waiver of foreign gaming approval from the Mississippi Commission for operations in other jurisdictions in which we conduct gaming operations and will be required to obtain approval or a waiver of such approval from the Mississippi Commission prior to engaging in any additional future gaming operations outside of Mississippi; provided, however, that upon notice to the Commission within 30 days of conducting such activity, such a waiver shall be deemed automatically granted under the Mississippi Commission’s regulations in connection with foreign gaming activities (except for internet gaming activities) conducted (i) within the fifty (50) states or any territory of the United States, (ii) on board any cruise ship embarking from a port located therein, and (iii) in any other jurisdiction in which a casino operator’s license or its equivalent is not required in order to legally conduct gaming operations.  
If the Mississippi Commission were to determine that we or our Gaming Subsidiary had violated a gaming law or regulation, the Mississippi Commission could limit, condition, suspend or revoke our approvals and the license of such Gaming Subsidiary, subject to compliance with certain statutory and regulatory procedures. In addition, we, the Gaming Subsidiary and the persons involved could be subject to substantial fines for each separate violation. Because of such a violation, the Mississippi Commission could attempt to appoint a supervisor to operate the casino facilities. Limitation, conditioning or suspension of any gaming license or approval or the appointment of a supervisor could (and revocation of any gaming license or approval would) materially adversely affect us and our business, financial condition and results of operations.  
License fees and taxes, computed in various ways depending on the type of gaming or activity involved, are payable to the State of Mississippi, to the Mississippi Commission and to the counties and cities in which a Gaming Subsidiary’s operations are conducted. Depending upon the particular fee or tax involved, these fees and taxes are payable either monthly, quarterly or annually. Generally, gaming fees and taxes are based upon the following:




a percentage of the gross gaming revenues received by the casino operation; or
the number of games operated by the casino.

The license fees payable to the State of Mississippi for Ameristar Casino Vicksburg include an annual license fee of $5,000, plus a monthly license fee based upon “gaming receipts” (generally defined as gross receipts less payouts to customers as winnings), and the maximum tax rate imposed by the State of Mississippi is eight percent of all gaming receipts in excess of $134,000 per month. The foregoing license fees we pay are allowed as a credit against our Mississippi income tax liability for the year paid. Additionally, there is an annual license fee payable by us to the state equal to $81,200 plus $100 for each game in excess of thirty five games on the casino floor. Moreover, the Mississippi Commission assesses Ameristar Casino Vicksburg with an annual investigative fee of $325,000 which is based on the number of gaming devices on the property. The fees payable to the city and county in which Ameristar Casino Vicksburg operates is a maximum of four percent of all gaming receipts in excess of $134,000 per month and an annual license fee of $150 per gaming device.

The Mississippi Commission’s regulations require as a condition of licensure that a project include a 500-car or larger parking facility in close proximity to the casino complex, a 300-room or larger hotel of at least a three diamond rating as defined by an acceptable travel publication as determined by the Mississippi Commission, a restaurant capable of seating at least 200 people and a fine dining facility capable of seating at least 75 people, a casino floor of at least 40,000 square feet and have (or support) an amenity that will be unique to the market, encourage economic development and promote tourism. Unless waived, such regulations apply to new casinos or acquisitions of closed casinos. Ameristar Casino Vicksburg is grandfathered under a prior version of the regulation and thus is exempt from the current regulation’s requirements.  
The sale of alcoholic beverages by Ameristar Casino Vicksburg is subject to licensing, control and regulation by both the local jurisdiction and the Alcoholic Beverage Control Division, or ABC, of the Mississippi Department of Revenue. Ameristar Casino Vicksburg is located in an area designated as a special resort area, which allows the property to serve alcoholic beverages on a 24-hour basis. If the ABC laws are violated, the ABC has the full power to limit, condition, suspend or revoke any license for the serving of alcoholic beverages or to place such licensee on probation with or without conditions. Any such disciplinary action could (and revocation would) have a significant adverse effect upon us and our business, financial condition and results of operations. Certain of our officers and managers at Ameristar Casino Vicksburg must be investigated by the ABC in connection with our liquor permits and changes in certain key positions must be approved by the ABC.
Nevada . The ownership and operation of casino gaming facilities in Nevada are subject to: (i) the Nevada Gaming Control Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, the “Nevada Act”); and (ii) various local regulations. Gaming operations are subject to the licensing and regulatory control of the Nevada Gaming Commission (the “Nevada Commission”), the Nevada Gaming Control Board (the “Nevada Board”) and Elko County. The Nevada Commission, the Nevada Board and Elko County are collectively referred to as the “Nevada Gaming Authorities.”
The laws, regulations and supervisory procedures of the Nevada Gaming Authorities are based upon declarations of public policy which are concerned with, among other things: (i) the prevention of unsavory or unsuitable persons from having a direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity; (ii) the establishment and maintenance of responsible accounting practices and procedures; (iii) the maintenance of effective controls over the financial practices of licensees, including the establishment of minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets and revenues, providing reliable record keeping and requiring the filing of periodic reports with the Nevada Gaming Authorities; (iv) the prevention of cheating and fraudulent practices; and (v) providing a source of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees.
Our subsidiary, Cactus Pete’s, LLC (the “Gaming Subsidiary”), is licensed by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The gaming licenses require the periodic payment of fees and taxes and are not transferable. We are currently registered by the Nevada Commission as a publicly traded corporation (a “Nevada Registered Corporation”) and have been found suitable as the parent company of the Gaming Subsidiary, which is a gaming licensee under the terms of the Nevada Act. As a Registered Corporation, we are required periodically to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission and furnish any other information which the Nevada Commission may require. No person may become a more than 5% stockholder of, or holder of more than a 5% interest of, or receive any percentage of profits from, a gaming licensee without first obtaining licenses and approvals from the Nevada Gaming Authorities. We and the Gaming Subsidiary have obtained from the Nevada Gaming Authorities the various registrations, findings of suitability, approvals, permits and licenses required in order to engage in gaming activities in Nevada.
 
The Nevada Gaming Authorities may investigate any individual who has a material relationship to, or material involvement with, us or the Gaming Subsidiary in order to determine whether such individual is suitable or should be licensed as a business associate of a gaming licensee. Our and the Gaming Subsidiary’s officers, directors and certain key employees, must file




applications with the Nevada Gaming Authorities and may be required to be licensed or found suitable by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. Our officers, directors and key employees who are actively and directly involved in gaming activities of the Gaming Subsidiary may be required to be licensed or found suitable by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The Nevada Gaming Authorities may deny an application for licensing for any cause which they deem reasonable. A finding of suitability is comparable to licensing, and both require submission of detailed personal and financial information followed by a thorough investigation. The applicant for licensing or a finding of suitability must pay all the costs of the investigation. Changes in licensed positions must be reported to the Nevada Gaming Authorities and, in addition to their authority to deny an application for a finding of suitability or licensure, the Nevada Gaming Authorities have jurisdiction to disapprove a change in a corporate position. If the Nevada Gaming Authorities were to find an officer, director or key employee unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to continue having a relationship with us or the Gaming Subsidiary, the companies involved would have to sever all relationships with such person. In addition, the Nevada Commission may require us or the Gaming Subsidiary to terminate the employment of any person who refuses to file appropriate applications. Determinations of suitability or of questions pertaining to licensing are not subject to judicial review in Nevada.
We and the Gaming Subsidiary are required to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission. Substantially all material loans, leases, sales of securities and similar financing transactions by us and the Gaming Subsidiary must be reported to or approved by the Nevada Commission.
If it were determined that the Nevada Act was violated by the Gaming Subsidiary, the gaming licenses it holds could be limited, conditioned, suspended or revoked, subject to compliance with certain statutory and regulatory procedures. In addition, we, the Gaming Subsidiary and the persons involved could be subject to substantial fines for each separate violation of the Nevada Act at the discretion of the Nevada Commission.
Any beneficial holder of our voting or non-voting securities, regardless of the number of shares owned, may be required to file an application, be investigated, and be found suitable as a beneficial holder of our voting securities if the Nevada Commission has reason to believe that such ownership would otherwise be inconsistent with the declared policies of the State of Nevada. The applicant must pay all costs of investigation incurred by the Nevada Gaming Authorities in conducting any such investigation.
The Nevada Act requires any person who acquires beneficial ownership of more than 5% of a Nevada Registered Corporation’s voting securities to report the acquisition to the Nevada Commission. The Nevada Act requires that beneficial owners of more than 10% of a Nevada Registered Corporation’s voting securities apply to the Nevada Commission for a finding of suitability within thirty days after the Chairman of the Nevada Board mails the written notice requiring such filing. However, an “institutional investor,” as defined in the Nevada Act, which beneficially owns more than 10% but not more than 11% of a Nevada Registered Corporation’s voting securities as a result of a stock repurchase by the Nevada Registered Corporation may not be required to file such an application. Further, an institutional investor which acquires more than 10%, but not more than 25%, of a Nevada Registered Corporation’s voting securities may apply to the Nevada Commission for a waiver of such finding of suitability if such institutional investor holds the voting securities for investment purposes only. An institutional investor that has obtained a waiver may hold more than 25% but not more than 29% of a Nevada Registered Corporation’s voting securities and maintain the waiver where the additional ownership results from a stock repurchase by the Nevada registered Corporation. An institutional investor shall not be deemed to hold voting securities for investment purposes unless the voting securities were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business as an institutional investor and not for the purpose of causing, directly or indirectly, the election of a majority of the members of the board of directors of the Nevada Registered Corporation, any change in the Nevada Registered Corporation’s corporate charter, restated bylaws, management, policies or operations of the Nevada Registered Corporation, or any of its gaming affiliates, or any other action which the Nevada Commission finds to be inconsistent with holding the Nevada Registered Corporation’s voting securities for investment purposes only. Activities which are not deemed to be inconsistent with holding voting securities for investment purposes only include: (i) voting on all matters voted on by stockholders; (ii) making financial and other inquiries of management of the type normally made by securities analysts for informational purposes and not to cause a change in its management, policies or operations; and (iii) such other activities as the Nevada Commission may determine to be consistent with such investment intent. If the beneficial holder of voting securities who must be found suitable is a corporation, partnership or trust, it must submit detailed business and financial information, including a list of beneficial owners. The applicant is required to pay all costs of investigation.
Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within thirty days after being ordered to do so by the Nevada Commission or the Chairman of the Nevada Board, may be found unsuitable. The same restrictions apply to a record owner if the record owner, after request, fails to identify the beneficial owner. Any security holder found unsuitable and who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of the security beyond such period of time as may be prescribed by the Nevada Commission may be guilty of a criminal offense. We are subject to disciplinary action if, after we receive notice that a person is unsuitable to be a security holder or to have any other relationship with us or the Gaming Subsidiary, we: (i) pay




that person any dividend or interest upon our voting securities, (ii) allow that person to exercise, directly or indirectly, any voting right conferred through securities held by that person, (iii) pay remuneration in any form to that person for services rendered or otherwise, or (iv) fail to pursue all lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person to relinquish such person’s voting securities including, if necessary, the immediate purchase of said securities for cash at fair market value.
The Nevada Commission may, in its discretion, require the holder of any debt security of a Nevada Registered Corporation to file applications, be investigated and be found suitable to own the debt or other security of a Nevada Registered Corporation if the Nevada Commission has reason to believe that such holder’s acquisition of such debt or other security would otherwise be inconsistent with the policy of the State of Nevada. If the Nevada Commission determines that a person is unsuitable to own such security, then pursuant to the Nevada Act, the Nevada Registered Corporation can be sanctioned, including the loss of its approvals if, without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission, it: (i) pays to the unsuitable person any dividend, interest, or any distribution whatsoever; (ii) recognizes any voting right by such unsuitable person in connection with such securities; (iii) pays the unsuitable person remuneration in any form; or (iv) makes any payment to the unsuitable person by way of principal, redemption, conversion, exchange, liquidation, or similar transaction.
We are required to maintain a current stock ledger in Nevada which may be examined by the Nevada Gaming Authorities at any time. If any securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to the Nevada Gaming Authorities. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable. We are also required to render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the beneficial owner.
We are not permitted to make a public offering of our securities without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission if the securities or the proceeds therefrom are intended to be used to construct, acquire or finance gaming facilities in Nevada, or to retire or extend obligations incurred for such purposes. On February 18, 2016, the Nevada Commission granted us prior approval to make public offerings for a period of thirty-three months, subject to certain conditions (the “Nevada Shelf Approval”). The Nevada Shelf Approval also applies to any affiliated company wholly owned by us (an “Affiliate”), which is a publicly traded corporation or would thereby become a publicly traded corporation pursuant to a public offering. The Nevada Shelf Approval, however, may be rescinded for good cause without prior notice upon the issuance of an interlocutory stop order by the Chairman of the Nevada Board. The Nevada Shelf Approval does not constitute a finding, recommendation or approval of the Nevada Gaming Authorities as to the accuracy or the adequacy of the prospectus or the investment merits of the securities offered thereby. Any representation to the contrary is unlawful.
Changes in control of a Nevada Registered Corporation through merger, consolidation, stock or asset acquisitions, management or consulting agreements, or any act or conduct by a person whereby such person obtains control, may not occur without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission. Entities seeking to acquire control of a Nevada Registered Corporation must satisfy the Nevada Board and Nevada Commission in a variety of stringent standards prior to assuming control of such Nevada Registered Corporation. The Nevada Commission may also require controlling stockholders, officers, directors and other persons having a material relationship or involvement with the entity proposing to acquire control to be investigated and licensed as part of the approval process relating to the transaction.
 
The Nevada legislature has declared that some corporate acquisitions opposed by management, repurchases of voting securities and corporate defense tactics affecting Nevada corporate gaming licensees, and Nevada Registered Corporations that are affiliated with those operations, may be injurious to stable and productive corporate gaming. The Nevada Commission has established a regulatory scheme to ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of these business practices upon Nevada’s gaming industry and to further Nevada’s policy to: (i) assure the financial stability of corporate gaming licensees and their affiliates; (ii) preserve the beneficial aspects of conducting business in the corporate form; and (iii) promote a neutral environment for the orderly governance of corporate affairs. Approvals are, in certain circumstances, required from the Nevada Commission before the Nevada Registered Corporation can make exceptional repurchases of voting securities above the current market price thereof and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management can be consummated. The Nevada Act also requires prior approval of a plan of recapitalization proposed by the Nevada Registered Corporation’s Board of Directors in response to a tender offer made directly to the Nevada Registered Corporation’s stockholders for the purposes of acquiring control of the Nevada Registered Corporation.
License fees and taxes, computed in various ways depending on the type of gaming or activity involved, are payable to the State of Nevada and Elko County, Nevada, in which the Gaming Subsidiary’s operations are conducted. Depending upon the particular fee or tax involved, these fees and taxes are payable either monthly, quarterly, or annually and are based upon either: (i) a percentage of the gross revenues received; (ii) the number of gaming devices operated; or (iii) the number of table games operated.




Any person who is licensed, required to be licensed, registered, required to be registered, or is under common control with such persons (collectively, “Licensees”), and who proposes to become involved in a gaming venture outside of Nevada, is required to deposit with the Nevada Board, and thereafter maintain, a revolving fund in the amount of $10,000 to pay the expenses of investigation by the Nevada Board of such Licensee’s participation in such foreign gaming. The revolving fund is subject to increase or decrease in the discretion of the Nevada Commission. Thereafter, Licensees are required to comply with certain reporting requirements imposed by the Nevada Act. Licensees are also subject to disciplinary action by the Nevada Commission if they knowingly violate any laws of the foreign jurisdiction pertaining to the foreign gaming operation, fail to conduct the foreign gaming operation in accordance with the standards of honesty and integrity required of Nevada gaming operations, engage in activities or enter into associations that are harmful to the State of Nevada or its ability to collect gaming taxes and fees, or employ, contract with, or associate with a person in the foreign operation who has been denied a license or finding of suitability in Nevada on the ground of unsuitability.
Ohio. We conduct horse racing operations at a thoroughbred racetrack in Ohio at Belterra Park Gaming and Entertainment Center. The state racing commission is responsible for regulating our racing operations and has broad oversight and authority, which includes annually reviewing and granting racing permits. In Ohio, so long as you hold a permit to conduct horse racing meetings, you may apply for a license to operate a video lottery terminal (“VLT”) facility.
On April 28, 2014, Ohio Lottery Commission approved the issuance of a video lottery sales agent license (the “VLT License”) to PNK (Ohio), LLC (“PNK Ohio”) to operate video lottery gaming at Belterra Park Gaming and Entertainment Center as a “VLT Operator.” On May 1, 2014, Belterra Park Gaming and Entertainment Center opened with 1,500 VLTs, six restaurants, VIP lounge, additional parking and more.
The ownership and operation of the VLT facilities in Ohio are subject to extensive state regulation under Chapter 3770 of the Ohio Revised Code (the “Ohio Act”), as well as the regulations which the Ohio Lottery Commission has adopted pertaining to the Ohio Act. The Ohio Act grants broad and pervasive regulatory powers and authorities to the Ohio Commission. The comprehensive regulations cover ownership, reporting, rules of game and operational matters.
The executive director of the Ohio Lottery Commission (the “Ohio Director”) has the authority to promulgate rules under which VLT facilities may be operated and is responsible for issuing the licenses. The license must be renewed annually and, every three (3) years, a VLT Operator is required to resubmit a complete license application. The initial application required the payment of a $50 million license fee, (i) $10 million of which was payable with the submission of the application (which we paid in January 2014), (ii) $15 million of which was payable upon commencement of VLT sales at a facility (which we paid in April 2014) and (iii) $25 million of which is payable one year following commencement of VLT sales (which we paid in April 2015).
A video lottery applicant must agree to submit background checks and reviews of the video lottery applicant or its principals, or any other persons affiliated with the applicant who the Ohio Director determines should be required to submit to a criminal or financial background check. Background checks for institutional investors who are video lottery principals may be required as deemed necessary by the Ohio Director. The Ohio Director may determine that an institutional investor that has an ownership interest of five percent to fifteen percent in the video lottery applicant is not a video lottery principal if it submits documentation sufficient to establish qualification as an institutional investor. Within the time specified by the Ohio Director, a video lottery applicant must obtain a dedicated non-revocable letter of credit, a surety bond, financial guarantee or other alternative form of credit approved by the Ohio Director in an amount determined by the Ohio Director.
Under Ohio law, a video lottery license is not transferrable for five years after the initial issuance of an operating license. Any person or entity holding an ownership interest in the video lottery applicant or holding, directly or indirectly, an ownership interest through a holding company of the video lottery applicant, as of the date of issuance of an operating license to the VLT Operator, may increase such ownership interest thereafter and any such increase or increases shall not be considered a transfer of license under the Ohio Act. However, any ownership interest in the VLT Operator or ownership, directly or indirectly, through a holding company of a VLT Operator, that is acquired after the date of issuance of an operating license to the VLT Operator by a person or entity not previously holding an ownership interest, which would result in such person or entity obtaining control of the video lottery applicant is prohibited under the Ohio Act. PNK Ohio was issued its VLT License on May 1, 2014. Any strategic transaction involving PNK Ohio (directly or indirectly through a holding company) that constitutes a “transfer” of PNK Ohio under the Ohio Act before May 1, 2019 may result in the suspension, modification or revocation of PNK Ohio’s VLT License. A suspension or revocation of such VLT License would necessitate the cessation of VLT operations at the Belterra Park Gaming and Entertainment Center facility.
All licenses are subject to the specific conditions imposed by the Ohio Director on the issued license. The Ohio Act prescribes grounds for the revocation or suspension of licenses, which may include failure to comply with license conditions, and grounds for imposition of civil penalties. Due to receipt of licensing approval from the Ohio Director, the Belterra Park




Gaming and Entertainment Center facility and some of its officers and employees are subject to specific regulations, including ongoing licensing requirements. Certain categories of key gaming employees and gaming employees, as determined by the Ohio Director, are required to be licensed in a manner approved by the Ohio Director. All VLT Operators must establish a responsible gaming program within 90 days of commencement of video lottery gaming activities. In addition, the VLT Operator is required to make a minimum of $150 million in capital investments, and such capital investment must be completed within three (3) years from issuance of the license. The construction for the Belterra Park Gaming and Entertainment Center facility fulfilled this minimum capital investment requirement. The VLT Operator must hire and compensate a sufficient number of personnel to ensure compliance with all provisions of the Ohio Act, and rules and regulations including audit, financial, operations, surveillance and security personnel to protect, secure and operate the equipment, buildings and grounds of the facilities at which the video lottery gaming activities will occur.
The Ohio Lottery Commission and the auditor of the state may at any time examine or access for any purposes all electronic, paper and computer records, files and other documents, VLTs, and hardware and software used in connection with video lottery of the VLT Operator whether kept or maintained by the licensee, its management company, employees, representatives and/or other entity assisting in the operation of video lottery at the VLT Operators’ facility. A VLT Operator shall allow inspections of the licensed premises at any time as authorized by the Ohio Director. The inspection may be made without prior notice to the VLT Operator.
The VLT Operator must notify the Ohio Director of: (i) material adverse changes in the value of the licensee’s operations; and (ii) material changes in control or ownership.
Each time the VLT Operator submits additional information to the Ohio Director (whether in accordance with notice requirements or during renewal applications), the Ohio Director maintains discretion to suspend, revoke or reconsider the application or otherwise modify the conditions of the issuance of the VLT License. If PNK Ohio’s VLT License is suspended, revoked or not renewed, VLT operations at the Belterra Park Gaming and Entertainment Center facility would cease.
Pursuant to Ohio law and the terms of PNK Ohio’s VLT License, the Ohio Lottery Commission will pay PNK Ohio a commission (the “VLT Commission”) in the amount of sixty-six and one-half percent (66.5%) of the video lottery terminal income generated by PNK Ohio. “Video lottery terminal income” is defined as credits played, minus approved video lottery terminal promotional gaming credits, minus video lottery prize awards.
Additionally, by rule of the Ohio State Racing Lottery Commission or by agreement between PNK Ohio and the applicable horsemen’s association, a percentage of PNK Ohio’s VLT Commission shall be paid for the benefit of horse breeding and racing in Ohio. PNK Ohio is currently negotiating such an agreement with the relevant horsemen’s association to determine the percentage of PNK Ohio’s VLT Commission that will be paid for the benefit of the horsemen’s association. Until such an agreement has been entered into, PNK Ohio has provided monthly payments to an escrow agent pursuant to an escrow agreement entered into with the Ohio State Racing Commission. Upon execution of an agreement with the relevant horsemen’s association or adoption of rules, funds (less applicable escrow fees) in an amount equal to the agreed upon percentage of the VLT Commission payable to such horsemen’s association are to be disbursed.
A change to these regulations or a change to the agreement with the relevant horsemen’s association could have a significant impact on the profitability of PNK Ohio’s VLT operations.
Because a video lottery license may only be issued to permit holders that are authorized by the state racing commission to conduct horse racing meetings, the Belterra Park Gaming and Entertainment Center facility must comply with rules and regulations governing horse racing permit holders. In addition, unless otherwise agreed to by the applicable horsemens association and the permit holder, beginning the calendar year after the permit holder first receives video lottery income, the facility is required to conduct a certain minimum number of live racing days depending upon the facilities revenue.
Pennsylvania .   The ownership and operation of casinos in Pennsylvania, including the Meadows, are subject to extensive state regulation under the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act of 2004, as well as the regulations set forth in Title 58, Part VII of the Pennsylvania Code. The primary objective of the law is to protect the public through regulation and policing of all activities involving gaming.
The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (“PGCB”) has general and sole regulatory authority over the conduct of gaming or related activities. The PGCB was formed in 2004 and consists of seven voting members; three of which are appointed by the governor and four of which are appointed by the leadership of the Pennsylvania General Assembly. The PGCB grants the following licenses:
Casino facilities, manufacturers, suppliers, manufacturer designees, gaming service providers




Principals: Owners, officers, directors, etc.
Key employees: General managers, department heads, etc.
Gaming level 2 employees: Table game managers, shift supervisors, promotional play supervisors, etc.
Gaming employees: Cage cashiers, dealers, slot attendants, etc.
Non-gaming employees: Cocktail servers, bartenders, janitorial personnel, valet parkers, etc.
When applying for a slot machine license, an applicant must meet certain financial fitness requirements in order to ensure there is clear and convincing evidence of financial stability, sufficient business ability and operational viability. An applicant for a Category 1 or 2 slot machine license must post a letter or credit or bond in the amount of $50,000,000 to demonstrate the financial ability to pay the slot machine license fee if issued a slot machine license by the PGCB. Each applicant for a Category 3 slot machine license is required to post a letter or credit or bond in the amount of $5,000,000. Upon receiving a slot machine license, the one-time license fee is deposited in the State Gaming Fund.
Pennsylvania has twelve casinos throughout the state. The PGCB is authorized to issue up to twenty-four licenses for slot machine operations. Seven licenses may be issued to existing horse racetracks (Category 1), five licenses may be issued to stand-alone casinos (Category 2), and two licenses may be issued to existing hotel resorts (Category 3). The law was amended on January 7, 2010 and allowed the Category 1 and Category 2 casinos to offer up to 250 table games, while Category 3 casinos are limited to offer a maximum of 50 table games. The law was amended again on October 30, 2017 and authorized up to 10 ancillary casinos (Category 4). Category 4 casinos may operate between 300 and 750 slot machines and up to 30 table games. In addition, Category 3 casinos may add up to 250 slot machines for a $2.5 million fee and up to 15 table games for a $1.0 million fee.
All permits and licenses issued by the PGCB are subject to renewal every three years. An application for renewal should be submitted at least 60 days prior to the expiration of the permit or license. The renewal application shall include an update of the information contained in the initial and any prior renewal applications and the payment of any renewal fee required.
A license or permit is a grant of privilege to conduct business in the state which is nontransferable except as provided by law. If a slot machine licensee becomes aware of any proposed or contemplated change of ownership of the slot machine licensee, they must immediately notify the PGCB. A change of ownership includes:
More than 5% of a slot machine licensee's securities or other ownership interests;
More than 5% of the securities or other ownership interests of a corporation or other form of business entity that owns directly or indirectly at least 20% of the voting or other securities or other ownership interests of the licensee;
The sale other than in the ordinary course of business of a licensee's assets; or
Any other transaction or occurrence deemed by the board to be relevant to license qualifications.
A slot machine license holder is permitted to sell liquor, malt or brewed beverages at the facility so long as the licensee is also licensed to sell liquor by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board. If not, a slot machine licensee is entitled to apply to the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board for a restaurant liquor or eating place retail dispenser license as permitted by the Liquor Code.
Within the PGCB is the Bureau of Investigations and Enforcement. The Bureau of Investigations and Enforcement enforces the Gaming Act and has investigative powers. They investigate and review all applicants and applications for a license, permit or registration. The Bureau of Investigations and Enforcement also monitors gaming operations and can inspect and examine licensed facilities. A review may include the review of accounting, administrative and financial records, management control systems, procedures and other records utilized by a licensed entity.
The passage of Act 7 of 2016 had a significant impact on the gaming industry in Pennsylvania. First, the PGCB was required to submit a report on the potential of fantasy sports as a gambling product in the state. With $100 million in revenue projections from expanded gaming identified in the 2016-2017 budget, Pennsylvania is evaluating viable ways to expand gaming. The budget also imposed an additional 2 percent tax on casinos’ gross revenue from table games, which is expected to generate $17 million. Each slot machine licensee shall pay a daily tax of 34 percent from its daily gross terminal revenue from slot machines in operation at its facility and a local share assessment.




With regard to the Category 1 licenses, Act 7 of 2016 reformed the race horse industry. Pennsylvania has six racetracks, including Meadows, which contribute nearly $1.6 billion to the state’s economy and employ 23,000 people. Three of the tracks are for standardbred racing and three are for thoroughbred racing. A State Horse Racing Commission was established within the Department of Agriculture to independently regulate horse racing. The State Horse Racing Commission is responsible for reviewing applications for licenses for horse racing meetings. A fee of $50,000 shall be paid to the Commission by a new applicant or a licensee seeking to renew their license. The State Horse Racing Commission also has the authority to promulgate rules and regulations necessary for administering and enforcing the new law.
The passage of Act 42 of 2017 was the largest expansion of gaming in Pennsylvania since 2004. The most significant change was the establishment of Category 4 licenses. The PGCB was given authorization to establish up to 10 locations, with licenses awarded via sealed bid auction. The minimum bid is $7.5 million, with an additional $2.5 million fee to operate table games. The tax rate on slot machines is 50%, with a 4% local share assessment, and the tax rate on table games is 14%, with a 2% local share assessment.
The initial auction is open to Category 1 and Category 2 licensees. The highest bidder receives exclusive rights to select a location with a 15-mile radius, marking the area in which the facility will be located. If all 10 Category 4 licenses are not auctioned off to Category 1 or 2 licensees, Category 3 licensees will be given the opportunity to bid. After that, at the discretion of the PGCB, any remaining Category 4 licenses may open for bid for other qualified entities that meet the licensure requirements and criteria established by the PGCB.
The location of a Category 4 casino may not be within 25 linear miles of another Category 1, Category 2, or Category 3 licensed facility, but may be within 25 linear miles of the winning bidder’s licensed facility. A Category 4 license will not be issued for a location in a county which hosts a Category 3 facility (Fayette and Montgomery counties), or in a sixth class county next to a county which hosts a Category 2 facility (Carbon, Pike, and Wayne counties). Municipalities were given the option to prohibit, or opt-out-of, the siting of a Category 4 facility within that municipality. A municipality may rescind opting out. However, the municipality may not subsequently prohibit the location of a Category 4 licensed facility after rescinding its prior prohibition.
In addition, Act 42 of 2017 authorized the operation of up to 5 video gaming terminals at truck stops, taxed at a rate of 42% with a 10% local share assessment. In the event that sports wagering is authorized under federal law, Act 42 of 2017 gives the PGCB the authority to establish standards and procedures to govern sports wagering in the state. Casinos may now offer interactive gaming, fantasy contests and simulcasting of horse racing. Finally, the Department of Revenue was given the authority to establish an iLottery program to sell existing products as well as internet instant games.
Other. In addition to the requirements discussed above, if we sought to establish gaming operations in any jurisdiction in which we currently do not operate, we would need to be registered, licensed, or found suitable to conduct gaming activities in that jurisdiction and, if successful in doing so, would be subject to such jurisdiction’s regulatory requirements applicable to gaming companies. Holders of our securities would also be subject to additional requirements regarding the ownership and disposition of their securities, including possibly being called forward by applicable gaming authorities to be licensed or found suitable to be the beneficial owner of our securities.
From time to time, legislators and special interest groups have proposed legislation that would restrict or prevent gaming operations. In addition, changes in regulations affecting the casino business can impact our existing or proposed operations. Any new restriction on or prohibition of our gaming operations could force us to curtail operations and incur significant losses.
Racetracks . In January 2013, we closed on the acquisition of 75.5% of the equity of Pinnacle Retama Partners, LLC, the owner of the racing license for Retama Park Racetrack in San Antonio, Texas, and entered into a management contract with Retama Development Corporation to manage the day-to-day operations at Retama Park Racetrack. As discussed above, we also have Belterra Park Gaming and Entertainment Center facility and the Meadows, which both have racetracks.
The racing authorities responsible for regulating our racing operations have broad oversight authority, which may include: annually reviewing and granting racing licenses and racing dates; approving the opening and operation of off track wagering facilities; approving simulcasting activities; licensing all officers, directors, racing officials and certain other employees of a racing licensee; and approving all contracts entered into by a racing licensee affecting racing, pari-mutuel wagering, account wagering and off track wagering operations.