NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Organization and Nature of Operations:

Business Description – Business Activity:  In August 2014, Denver Consulting Group (“DCG”) was registered as an LLC in Colorado, established by a partnership group of experienced cannabis business professionals who recognized the need for quality compliance and operational consulting to support the wave of marijuana legalization both nationally and globally. DCG provides both medical and retail marijuana organizations with proven methods to improve operations, increase compliance with all state and local regulations, train staff, develop customized compliant packaging solutions, increase security, helps build brands to create customer loyalty, and more. The company offers its services to virtually every type of business in the cannabis industry, including growers, manufacturers, processors, and retailers.

The ownership group of DCG is comprised of seven members. The primary founding members, Greg Gamet, Justin Jones, and Bryan Sullivan co-founded JGB Ventures, LLC (dba. DANK) and opened DANK Medical Dispensary in September of 2009.  Jay Griffin and Dan Glenn joined the DANK team in 2010 and 2013, respectively, as operational managers responsible for full implementation of compliant standard operating procedures and the health and safety of the patients they served. In January 2014, DANK was issued one of the first five recreational dispensary licenses in Colorado.

Being involved in the everyday operations of two successful branches of DANK, the owners noticed a lack of American distribution companies providing quality child safe packaging for the cannabis industry.  In the same year (2014), Kush Bottles Colorado was founded to fill this void and quickly became the industry leader in child safe packaging. The continual success of both DANK dispensaries combined with Kush Bottles organically created an extensive network of cannabis professionals whom continually turned to Greg, Justin, and the other owners as the leading experts in running successful, compliant, holistic cannabis businesses. Recognizing yet another unmet need in the cannabis industry, Frank Falconer joined the team and created the founding ownership group of Denver Consulting Group at the end of 2014. Ryan Lewis joined in 2015 as the final owner after just half of a year of providing exemplary consulting as one of the company’s first employees.

DCG’s founding vision was to work with clients to develop custom business strategies based on industry best practices for the burgeoning cannabis industry. Their expertise in cannabis regulations, dispensary compliance, overall business operations and marijuana cultivation have ensured the successes of clients in the continually evolving cannabis industry. DCG has also provided general consultation to help new potential cannabis business owners and investors start up successful ventures, streamline and improve current operations, and enhance revenues at several other cannabis-related companies nationwide. Overall, consulting services have ranged from licensing & application support, including all documentation surrounding cultivation, dispensary, and processing Standard Operating Procedures such as employee handbooks, compliance logs, and training manuals, to new marijuana business plans including cultivation, security, operations, staffing, sales tracking, accounting, site selection and community outreach, to Seed to Sale METRC Training, MED Compliance Audits, Staffing, Operation & Security Plans for existing operations.

Related Parties – Related parties are any entities or individuals that, through employment, ownership or other means, possess the ability to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the Company.  We disclose related party transactions that are outside of normal compensatory agreements, such as salaries or board of director fees.  We had related party transactions with the following individuals / companies:

Going Concern – The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes we will be able to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our generating profitable operations in the future and / or obtaining the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management believes that actions presently being taken to further implement our business plan and generate additional revenues provide opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While we believe in the viability of our strategy to generate additional revenues and our ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect.

The Company had Net (loss) income of $(5,433) and $43,693 at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and further gains are anticipated in the development of our business. Accordingly, there is no substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards –

FASB ASU 2017-01 “Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805)” – In January 2017, the FASB issued 2017-1. The new guidance that changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. The guidance requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. The guidance also requires a business to include at least one substantive process and narrows the definition of outputs by more closely aligning it with how outputs are described in ASC 606. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and for interim periods within those years. Adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

FASB ASU 2016-15 “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)” – In August 2016, the FASB issued 2016-15. Stakeholders indicated that there is a diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Adoption of this ASU will not have a significant impact on our statement of cash flows.

FASB ASU 2016-11 “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)” – In May 2016, the FASB issued 2016-11, which clarifies guidance on assessing whether an entity is a principal or an agent in a revenue transaction. This conclusion impacts whether an entity reports revenue on a gross or net basis.  This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with the option to adopt as early as December 15, 2016. We are currently assessing the impact of adoption of this ASU on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Cash Flows – During the year ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, the Company primarily utilized cash and cash equivalents and profits from operations to fund its operations.

Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost and represent cash on hand, deposits placed with banks or other financial institutions and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less as of the purchase date. The Company had $32,495 and $19,563 classified as cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Basis of Presentation: These accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for annual financial statements.

Fair Value Measurements:  Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Our financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, fixed assets, other assets, accounts payable, note payable, deferred revenue, accrued liabilities and other assets. The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate their fair value due to their short maturities. The carrying amount of our debt approximates fair value because the interest rates on these instruments approximate the interest rate on debt with similar terms available to us. Our derivative liability was adjusted to fair market value at the end of each reporting period, using Level 3 inputs.

Use of Estimates:  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported therein. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be based upon amounts that differ from these estimates.

Accounts receivable: The Company extends unsecured credit to its customers in the ordinary course of business. Accounts receivable related to consulting revenues are recorded at the time the milestone is achieved, resulting in funds being due, services are delivered and payment is reasonably assured. Consulting revenues are generally collected from 1 to 30 days after the invoice is sent. As of December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively, the Company had accounts receivable of $45,564 and $43,502. The company wrote off $0 of its accounts receivable during the current year. The company will continue to evaluate the need for recognizing an additional allowance in the future.

Other assets: As of December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively other assets was $4,123 and $2,274 of which included security deposits and prepaid expenses.

Accounts payable: Accounts payable at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $1,282 and $4,418, respectively and were comprised of operating accounts payable for various professional services incurred during the ordinary course of business.

Payroll and payroll tax accrual: As of December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively was $8,907 and $7,425 of which was the final payroll and payroll tax payments for December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively

Other liabilities: As of December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively other liabilities was $664 and $0. This was solely comprised of accrued interest.

Revenue recognition and related allowances:  Revenue from consulting services is recognized when the obligations to the client are fulfilled which is determined when milestones in the contract are achieved. The point at which the Company recognizes revenue meets all four revenue recognition criteria. The Company’s contracts provide evidence that an arrangement exists, the price is fixed and the collectability is assured.

Costs of Services Sold – Costs of services sold are comprised of salaries for employees, contractor expenses and licensing fees incurred while supporting the sale of the Company’s services.

General & Administrative Expenses – General and administrative expense are comprised of all expenses not linked to the formation of the Company’s services.

Advertising and Promotional Costs:  Advertising and promotional costs are expensed as incurred and were $76,200 and $80,008 during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Income taxes:  The Company has adopted SFAS No. 109 – “Accounting for Income Taxes”. ASC Topic 740 requires the use of the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method of ASC Topic 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, the Company had $22,045 and $1,402 in distributions to the partners of the Company. There are seven partners of the Company; Greg Gamet, Justin Jones, Bryan Sullivan, Jay Griffin, Dan Glenn, Frank Falconer and Ryan Lewis.

The Company depreciates their fixed assets on a straight-line basis over its expected useful lives. The Company’s capitalization policy is to capitalize all assets over $3,000.

Depreciation expense for the period ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively was $44,592 and $0.

At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, the Company had $30,820 and $0 of finished goods inventory. The note payable is a balance that is due to two partners of the Company, Justin Jones and Greg Gamet.

At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, the Company had customer deposits balance of $74,632 and $26,056. These deposits represent customer payments on contracts that the company has not performed services on.

As of December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively, the Company has five related parties, JGB Ventures LLC, Kush Bottles, Cannascore, Sullivan Law and Elm Properties. As of December 31, 2016, and 2015, the Company had related party sales of $54,708 and $51,251.

Office Lease – Denver, Colorado  – The Company entered into a lease for office space at 4821 East 38 ^th Ave, Denver, Colorado 80207. The lease period started April 1, 2015 and will terminate March 31, 2020, resulting in the following future commitments:

The Company’s rent expense during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, was $29,172 and $0.

The Company was formed at inception and remains a Limited Liability Company under the IRS Code. As a result, in lieu of corporate income taxes, the partners are taxed on their proportionate share of the Company's Income. Therefore, no provision for income taxes exist and no deferred tax asset exist as these both are the responsibility and benefit of partners, the owner. As such, the Company during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, had $0 and $0 tax liability and $0 and $0 deferred tax asset as a result.

Subsequent to year-end, on May 5, 2017, we entered into an Acquisition Agreement with Medicine Man Technologies, Inc., a Colorado corporation. The ratification of the acquisition of this company requires the approval of the holders of a majority of our shareholders, which will be submitted for such approval at our annual shareholder meeting to be held in June 2017.

This transaction will become effective upon the filing of Statement of Merger with the Secretary of State in Colorado and Statement of Share Exchange and Articles of Exchange with the Colorado Secretary and State and Nevada Secretary of State, respectively, which is expected to upon ratification by our shareholders.

Upon effectiveness, we will issue an aggregate of 2,258,065 shares of our Common Stock to Denver Consulting Group partners in exchange for 100% of the company.

On July 21, 2017, Medicine Man Technologies, Inc., executed the applicable Share Exchange Agreement and on July 25, 2017, they filed the Statement of Share Exchange with the Colorado Secretary of State’s office, which was the final condition that was needed to be met to make the acquisition final.