Item 1A. Risk Factors.
You should consider carefully the following risks and uncertainties, together with the other information in this report, including the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on page 37 and our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes beginning on page 7, and in our other public filings in evaluating our business. Current global economic events and conditions may amplify many of these risks. Our business, operating results, financial condition or prospects could also be harmed by risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently do not believe are material. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our Class A Common Stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Any decline or disruption in the travel and pet care services industries or an economic downturn could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our financial performance is substantially dependent on the strength of the travel and pet care services industries, which is affected in part by macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions. Sustained levels of increased inflation, rising interest rates, significant U.S. dollar and foreign currency fluctuations, lower consumer confidence, depressed consumer spending, higher levels of consumer debt, lower pet adoption levels, the number of pet owning households, a reduction in the volume of home sales and its impact on relocating households, geopolitical instability, economic uncertainty, slower economic growth or a recession, volatility in the stock market, any U.S. government shutdown, any further downgrades in the U.S. credit rating, and delays, pandemics or other health-related events, cancellations and other disruptions impacting the travel industry could adversely impact travel and demand for our services. For example, pet care providers have increased prices on the platform and may continue to raise prices to a degree that pet parent demand declines, and the overall price of travel could increase to a degree that demand for travel and thus travel-related pet care services declines. In addition to the impacts of COVID-19 and other non-COVID illnesses as discussed elsewhere in this report, other events beyond our control have resulted in and may continue to result in declines in travel or continued work-from-home policies. For example, the current armed conflicts between Ukraine and Russia and between Israel and Hamas and their resulting consequences, such as increasing fuel and commodity prices and the potential for political unrest or military conflict to spread, could materially adversely impact travel and demand for our services in all of our markets. Moreover, the resumption of repayments on federally-held student loans in October 2023 may adversely impact demand for our services in the United States. Because these events or concerns and the full impact of their effects are largely unpredictable and difficult to measure, they can dramatically and suddenly affect travel and work behavior by pet parents and therefore demand for our platform, which could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our financial performance is also subject to global economic conditions and their impact on levels of discretionary consumer spending. Downturns in worldwide or regional economic conditions or recessions beyond our control, such as the downturn resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic or a future downturn resulting from rising inflation or interest rates, lower consumer confidence, depressed consumer spending, higher levels of consumer debt, a reduction in the volume of home sales and its impact on relocating households, changes in monetary or fiscal policy, volatility due to geopolitical instability, the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and other financial institutions, or the uncertainty arising from these events have led or could lead to a general decrease in travel and spending on pet care services. Future downturns in economic conditions or a recession in the United States or worldwide may materially adversely impact demand for our platform, our business, operating results and financial condition, including potential impairments. See “—Failure to successfully execute and integrate acquisitions or receive a favorable return on acquisitions or strategic investments could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.”
We have incurred net losses in each year since inception and may not be able to achieve or sustain annual net income.
As of September 30, 2023, we had an accumulated deficit of $377.0 million. Historically, we have invested significantly in efforts to grow our pet parent and pet care provider network, introduced new or enhanced offerings and features, increased marketing spend, expanded operations, acquired and invested in other companies, and hired additional employees. We are passionate about continually enhancing the experience of pets, pet parents and pet care providers, which may not necessarily maximize short-term financial results. This focus may not be consistent with our short-term expectations and may not produce the long-term benefits expected. In the second quarter of 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we significantly reduced fixed and variable costs. Since then, we have made and expect to continue to make significant investments related to improving market conditions and operating as a public company. For example, we have significantly increased headcount as demand
increased starting in 2021, invested in product enhancements and marketing efforts, acquired GoodPup, an early-stage company that operates a virtual dog training platform, and invested in another early-stage company with a complementary service offering. Additionally, stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock units, or RSUs, and other equity awards will continue to be a significant expense in future periods as we grow as a company and grant additional RSUs. We may not succeed in increasing revenue sufficiently to offset these higher expenses or achieve a positive return on our acquisitions and investments, which would adversely impact our ability to achieve or sustain annual profitability.
Our revenue may not continue to grow over time and may slow or reverse again in the future.
Prior to COVID-19, we experienced significant revenue growth from 2016 to 2019, growing from $16 million to $95 million in revenue. In 2020, revenue decreased approximately 49% from 2019 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 2021 revenue increased approximately 16% from 2019 levels, 2022 revenue increased approximately 58% from 2021 levels and revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 increased approximately 36% from the same period in 2022. However, such growth may again slow or reverse due to the other risks described in these “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. Investors should not rely on our revenue or revenue growth for any previous quarterly or annual period as any indication of revenue or revenue growth in future periods.
Future revenue growth depends on the growth of the number of pet parents on our platform, the ABV and our take rates, the frequency with which pet parents seek to book services, our ability to attract sufficient high-quality pet care providers to meet pet parent demand, cancellation rates, and the effects of general economic and business conditions worldwide, including trends in the travel industry, inflation, consumer confidence and spending, pet adoption levels, the volume of home sales and its impact on relocating households, fiscal and monetary policy, fuel and commodity costs, and interest rates. We also expect to continue to make investments in the development and expansion of our technology and business, which may not result in increased revenue or growth. If the demand for access to online marketplaces for individual pet care services does not grow, or if we are unable to maintain market share, our revenue growth rate could be materially adversely affected.
A softening of demand, especially in the acquisition of new pet parents which is an important driver of future revenue, may be caused by events outside of our control, such as lower pet adoption levels, the number of pet owning households, a reduction in the volume of home sales and its impact on relocating households, COVID-19, other non-COVID illnesses or health-related events, changes in pet parent and pet care provider preferences, an economic downturn, or other risks described in these “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report, will result in decreased revenue. For example, starting in the second quarter of 2022 and continuing through September 2023, we saw the Google query volume for some key terms like “dog boarding,” which is correlated to demand from new pet parents, decreasing significantly year-over-year as compared to the outsized gains of 2021, although still significantly above 2019 levels. Moreover, while ABVs have increased since the second quarter of 2021 helping to drive revenue growth, the rate of increases has moderated since the second quarter of 2022, which may impact future revenue growth and growth rates. Moreover, we have observed lower ABV from international bookings compared to those from the United States. As such, a continued increase in international bookings relative to U.S. bookings could further moderate or reduce our overall ABV growth.
Our Adjusted EBITDA may not continue to grow over time and may slow or reverse again in the future.
Although our Adjusted EBITDA has continued to improve on an annual basis and was positive for the first time during fiscal 2021 and again during fiscal 2022 and continued to grow during the first three quarters of 2023, we may experience declines in Adjusted EBITDA on a quarterly or annual basis if general economic and business conditions worsen. See “—Any decline or disruption in the travel and pet care services industries or an economic downturn could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.” Other developments in our business, including lower than anticipated revenue and higher operating expenses due to increased investments in the business, higher personnel costs, increased advertising, marketing and stock-based compensation expenses, operating costs from acquisitions, or unanticipated events, could negatively impact our future Adjusted EBITDA. If our future Adjusted EBITDA fails to meet investor or analyst expectations, it is likely to have a materially negative effect on our stock price. Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental metric that is not calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. See the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure stated in accordance with GAAP, and for additional information.
The COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of actions to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic have materially adversely impacted and may continue to materially adversely impact our business, operating results and financial condition.
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in new habits such as increased adoption of remote and hybrid working arrangements and increased reliance on online meeting tools rather than in-person meetings and business travel, and at various points during the pandemic, governments imposed various restrictions to limit the spread of COVID-19. The spread of any new variants or sub-variants of COVID-19, especially among pet parents, pet care providers and our employees, the return of any of these government restrictions, and the entrenchment of or changes in the new habits regarding working arrangements and travel may have a material adverse impact on our long-term business, operations and financial condition, and the availability of and demand for pet care.
Although demand for our offerings resumed in May 2021 as government restrictions lifted and we have since achieved record quarterly and annual highs for new and repeat bookings, GBV and revenue, we continued to see demand adversely impacted through the end of 2022 as a result of each COVID-19 wave or variant and other non-COVID seasonal illnesses and cancellation rates that remained elevated compared to pre-pandemic levels. Despite achieving increases in 2022 and year-to-date 2023 revenue, GBV and new and repeat bookings as compared to 2021 and year-to-date 2022, respectively, the effect and extent of the impacts of COVID-19 on our business in the near and medium-term continue to be uncertain and difficult to predict. As our performance in 2021 benefited from a spike in travel demand from the vaccine roll-outs and the surge in pandemic pet adoptions and our performance in the nine months ended September 30, 2023 benefited in comparison to the prior year period due to the adverse demand impact resulting from the BA.5 variant wave during that period, the year-over-year growth rates involving these periods should not be considered representative of the long-term growth rate performance of our business. Accordingly, our business may again be negatively impacted if governmental orders and advisories are reinstated due to novel strains of COVID-19 or if our pet parent and pet care provider base are infected with COVID-19 or non-COVID illnesses that may result from reduced immunity caused by social distancing during the pandemic or their behavior is impacted due to such infections or new COVID-19 variants or sub-variants, and demand may remain depressed for a significant length of time if COVID-19 results in long-term changes in behavior. We cannot predict when, if ever, cancellation rates will return to pre-pandemic levels, nor do we know how pet parent and pet care provider behavior will be impacted even if pre-pandemic levels of cancellation rates return.
In the second half of 2022, we adopted a policy empowering department heads to determine the in-office and remote work requirements for their teams. While we will maintain office space for employees to work, learn and collaborate, most of our employees are still working remotely the majority of the time and these arrangements and similar remote working arrangements available to many pet parents, especially if maintained over the long-term, could have a number of materially negative impacts on our business, including:
•reduced or flat demand for daytime pet care services due to pet parents’ presence at home;
•slower execution of our business plans and reduced productivity and availability of key personnel, other employees and third-party service providers that perform critical services;
•increased consumer privacy, information technology security and fraud risks;
•impairment charges, which may be material, related to real property lease agreements if we exit lease agreements or enter into subleases, or remote work arrangements become permanent; and
•increased costs, which may be material, for travel and software tools.
The extent of the longer term impact of COVID-19 on our business and financial results will depend largely on future developments, including the development, severity and transmissibility of novel strains of the COVID-19 virus, any non-COVID illnesses that may result from reduced immunity caused by social distancing during the pandemic, impacts on travel or work behavior, the impact on capital and financial markets and on the United States and global economies, the availability, uptake, and effectiveness of vaccines and boosters, the prevalence of travel restrictions, any risk or perceived risk that pets may be a vector for COVID-19, and governmental or regulatory orders that impact our business, all of which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. Any of the foregoing factors, or other cascading effects of COVID-19 that are not currently foreseeable, may materially adversely impact our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.
Online marketplaces for pet care are still in relatively early stages of growth and if demand for them does not continue to grow, grows slower than expected, or fails to grow as large as expected, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
Demand for booking pet care through online marketplaces has grown rapidly since the 2011 launch of our platform, but such platforms are still relatively new and it is uncertain to what extent market acceptance will continue to grow, if at all. Our success will depend to a substantial extent on the willingness of people to obtain pet care through platforms like ours. If the public does not perceive these services as beneficial, or chooses not to adopt them, or instead adopts alternative solutions, then the market for our platform may not further develop, may develop slower than we expect, or may not achieve the growth potential we expect, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our marketing efforts to help grow the business may not be effective.
Promoting awareness of our platform is important to our ability to grow the business and to attract new pet parents and pet care providers. Since inception, our user base has grown in large part as a result of word-of-mouth, complemented by paid and organic search, social media and other online advertising and infrequent television advertising. Many of our marketing efforts to date have focused on amplifying and accelerating this word-of-mouth momentum and such efforts may not continue to be effective. Although we continue to rely significantly on word-of-mouth, organic search and other unpaid channels, we believe that a significant amount of the growth in the number of pet parents and pet care providers that use our platform also is attributable to our paid marketing initiatives.
Prior to the impact of COVID-19, marketing efforts included referrals, affiliate programs, free or discount trials, partnerships, display advertising, billboards, radio, video, television, direct mail, social media, email, podcasts, classified advertisement websites, mobile “push” communications, search engine optimization and paid keyword search campaigns. During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021, we managed marketing spend carefully, focusing expenses primarily in keyword search campaigns and testing. More recently, we have invested into the recovery with increased spending on social media, streaming video and linear television, with a careful eye toward measurable results. Our marketing initiatives may become increasingly expensive and generating a meaningful return on these initiatives may be difficult. Even if we successfully increase revenue as a result of paid marketing efforts, we may not offset the additional marketing expenses incurred. Moreover, marketing investments are made ahead of GBV and bookings, and thus marketing as a percentage of revenue is correlated to increases in cancellation rates as we incur marketing expense for a booking that is not completed. Some or all of our marketing efforts have been less effective in periods of lower overall category demand and may be limited in their ability to help us grow our business in the future.
Some providers of consumer devices, mobile or desktop operating systems, and web browsers have, or have announced plans to, disable or block tracking technologies (also known as cookies) which, if widely adopted, could also result in online tracking methods becoming significantly less effective. For example, some of our marketing measurement and targeting tools, as well as those used by our media partners, rely on third-party cookies. As access to user cookies is restricted, we may lose the ability to target our advertisements and measure their effectiveness and efficiency. As a result, the ability of our media placements to reach their intended audiences may be reduced, and we may decide to reduce or completely eliminate spending on the affected marketing channels, which could reduce our ability to effectively or efficiently acquire new customers. Similarly, our vendors, particularly those providing advertising and analytics products and services have modified and may continue to modify their products and services in ways that reduce the efficiency of our marketing efforts and our access to data about the use of our platform. In addition, certain laws regulate the use of cookies and other tracking technologies, which limit the effectiveness of our marketing activities, impact our search engine rankings, divert technology personnel resources, increase costs, and subject us to additional liabilities. See the section titled “—Risks Related to Privacy and Technology” below. Limits to our use of these technologies could harm our ability to personalize the experience of buyers, increase our costs, and limit our ability to attract and retain pet care providers and pet parents on cost-effective terms. If marketing efforts to help grow the business are not effective, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
Off-platform bookings and payments have had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Certain pet parents reach out to pet care providers (and vice versa) and incentivize them to book directly with them and bypass our platform, which reduces the use of our platform. Additionally, certain pet care providers source bookings through our platform and then complete the transaction off of our platform and may continue to do so or may increase the share of bookings that they take off our platform. The reasons for this behavior may include pricing, the fees we charge to use our platform, and negative perceptions about the usability and functionality of the Rover app. We endeavor to reduce this activity through continual improvements to our platform and other offerings, such as the Rover Guarantee, that incentivize pet care providers and pet parents to transact through Rover. In addition, our matching algorithm is designed to identify signals of high quality care that are observable from platform transactions, such as repeat booking activity, and to increase the chance that pet care providers exhibiting such signals are featured to pet parents. We also have notifications in the platform that encourage pet care
providers to book through the platform, and we identify and deactivate serial diverters from the platform. Despite these attributes, we cannot prevent off-platform transactions entirely.
If we fail to retain existing pet care providers or attract new pet care providers, or if pet care providers fail to provide high-quality offerings, our business, operating results and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.
Pet care providers have a range of options for offering their services and they may advertise their offerings in multiple ways that may or may not include our platform. Some pet care providers have chosen to cross-list their offerings on other platforms, which reduces the availability of such offerings on our platform. When offerings are cross listed, the price paid by pet parents on our platform may be or may appear to be less competitive for many reasons, including differences in fee structure and policies, which may cause pet parents to book with competitors. Additionally, as noted in the previous risk factor, certain pet parents and pet care providers may complete their transactions off-platform. A change in our ability to attract pet care providers to our platform, enable them to generate income, and dissuade them from sourcing bookings off our platform could negatively impact our ability to provide sufficient offerings to attract and serve pet parents and, in turn, have a significant negative impact on our GBV, bookings, revenue, operating results and financial condition.
Our business depends on pet care providers maintaining their use of our platform and engaging in practices that encourage pet parents to book their services, including increasing the number of offerings that are available to book, providing timely responses to inquiries from pet parents, offering a variety of desirable and differentiated offerings at competitive prices that meet the expectations of pet parents, and offering exceptional services to pets and pet parents. These practices are outside of our control. If pet care providers do not establish or maintain enough availability, the number of bookings declines for a particular period, or pet care provider pricing is unattractive or insufficient, revenue will decline and our business, operating results and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.
Other factors that could adversely impact the availability of pet care providers and the number of offerings on our platform include:
•our inability to offer sufficient tools or product features to assist them;
•negative perceptions about, or our inability to satisfy expectations related to, the usability and functionality of the Rover app;
•our inability to attract large number of prospective pet parents to our platform;
•fees we charge for our facilitation and support services;
•pet care providers choosing other third-party platforms over our platform;
•economic, social and political factors, including improving economic conditions that could lead to pet care providers obtaining additional or alternative opportunities for work;
•negative perceptions of trust and safety on and off our platform;
•negative experiences with pets and pet parents, including pets who damage pet care provider property;
•COVID-19, non-COVID illnesses or other pandemics or health concerns and their impact on pet care providers;
•our efforts or failure or perceived failure to comply with regulatory requirements;
•any discontinuation of, or reduction in reimbursement benefits under, the Rover Guarantee (which reimburses both pet parents and pet care providers up to $25,000 for costs arising from certain injuries or damages that occur during a service booked and paid through Rover and up to $100,000 (or until June 2023, up to $1 million) for costs arising from damage to pet parent property or certain third-party injuries, subject to terms and conditions thereunder);
•large numbers of pet parent cancellations; and
•removal of pet care providers from our platform due to violation of our community standards or other factors we deem detrimental to our community.
If we are unable to attract and retain individual pet care providers in a cost-effective manner, or at all, our business, operating results and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.
If we fail to retain existing pet parents or attract new pet parents, or if pet parents fail to receive high-quality offerings, our business, operating results and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.
Our success depends significantly on retaining existing pet parents and attracting new pet parents to use our platform, increasing the number of repeat bookings that pet parents make and attracting them to different types of service offerings on our platform. Pet parents have a range of options for meeting their pet care needs and may choose to arrange for pet care services with pet care providers outside of our platform. Our ability to attract and retain pet parents could be materially adversely affected by a number of factors, such as:
•pet care providers failing to provide differentiated, high-quality and adequately available pet care services at competitive prices;
•negative perceptions about, or our inability to satisfy expectations related to, the usability and functionality of the Rover app;
•increasing prices set by pet care providers;
•fees we charge for our facilitation and support services, including any increases to our fees such as the implementation of a shift during 2023 of all legacy pet parents in the United States and Canada to the 11% fee structure that we implemented for new owners in 2021;
•taxes we may collect in certain jurisdictions;
•our failure to facilitate new or enhanced offerings or features that pet parents value;
•large numbers of pet care provider cancellations;
•macroeconomic, geopolitical and other conditions, including sustained levels of increased inflation and rising interest rates, lower consumer confidence, depressed consumer spending, higher levels of consumer debt, lower pet adoption levels, the number of pet owning households, a reduction in the volume of home sales and its impact on relocating households, any U.S. government shutdown, and slower economic growth or recession, outside of our control affecting travel or business activities generally;
•elevated levels of delays or cancellations impacting travel activities;
•negative perceptions of the trust and safety of our platform;
•increased restrictions on travel and immigration;
•COVID-19, other non-COVID illnesses, or other pandemics or health concerns and their impact on pet parents;
•the impact of climate change on travel and seasonal destinations (such as fires, floods and other natural disasters);
•the performance of our matching algorithms;
•pet parents not receiving timely and adequate support from us;
•negative associations with, or reduced awareness of, our brand;
•declines and inefficiencies in our marketing efforts;
•our platform not being perceived as easy to navigate, including due to pet parents experiencing an unsatisfactory sign-up, search, booking, or payment experience on our platform or our failure to provide a user experience that meets rapidly changing expectations;
•any discontinuation of, or reduction in reimbursement benefits under, the Rover Guarantee such as the June 2023 reduction in the amount reimbursed for costs arising from damage to pet parent property or certain third-party injuries from $1 million to $100,000;
•any actual or perceived breach of privacy, data protection or security on our platform;
•our efforts or failure or perceived failure to comply with regulatory requirements; and
•our decision to remove pet parents from our platform for not adhering to our community standards or other factors we deem detrimental to our community.
Our business and users are subject to tax information reporting requirements in a number of jurisdictions, which could increase our operational costs and negatively impact the user experience and bookings on our platform.
In the United States, we are required to report payments we process on our platform on behalf of pet care providers who are U.S. persons if they reach certain payment thresholds to the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, and certain states. The IRS threshold and certain state thresholds are scheduled to significantly decrease from more than 200 transactions per year and exceeding an aggregate amount of $20,000 in gross processed payments to $600 in gross processed payments starting with the 2023 tax year pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021. In addition to our changing and currently uncertain tax information reporting requirements in the United States, there are a number of international jurisdictions where we operate that have or are in the process of implementing new tax information reporting requirements. For example, in the European Union we are subject to tax information reporting requirements referred to as DAC7 with no minimum threshold starting with the 2023 tax year and Canada will have similar requirements starting with the 2024 tax year.
These obligations have and are expected to continue to increase our operational costs and could negatively impact the pet care provider experience. In the U.S., this may be due to confusion resulting from the fact that amounts reported on the tax information reporting forms are not reduced to reflect refunds or fees we retain. These obligations could also make our platform less attractive to pet care providers, who may not wish to be subject to these tax information reporting requirements, may not wish to provide their tax identification information, may fail to provide accurate information, or may find their reporting obligations confusing, any of which could result in increased off-platform bookings and payments and decreased pet care provider retention. Any failure by us to meet tax information reporting requirements or to provide a streamlined pet care provider experience in collecting required information or any decrease in pet care provider retention or increase in off-platform bookings and payments resulting from the tax information reporting requirements could negatively impact our business, financial condition and operating results.
The success of our platform relies on our matching algorithms and other proprietary technology and any failure to operate and improve our algorithms or to develop other innovative proprietary technology effectively could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We use proprietary Rover matching algorithms in an effort to maximize pet parent and pet care provider satisfaction and retention, as well as to optimize return on marketing expenses. Built to improve with data science, we have carefully designed algorithms to leverage growing scale by helping pet parents find increasingly better matches as our provider network expands. Successfully using our algorithms to match pet parents and pet care providers is crucial to our continued success, as better matches can lead to more bookings, more data and, in turn, further improvements to our algorithms. Any failure to successfully operate or improve our algorithms or to develop other innovative proprietary technology could materially adversely affect our ability to maintain and expand our business. Fewer matches could lead to fewer bookings, which could in turn lead to less or lower quality data, affecting our ability to improve our algorithms and maintain, market and scale our platform effectively. Our competition may increase with the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence, or AI, and machine learning.
Additionally, there is increased governmental interest in regulating technology companies in areas including algorithm-based discrimination. Any failure, or perceived failure, or negative consequences associated with our efforts to comply with any present or future laws or regulations in this area could subject us to claims, actions and other legal and regulatory proceedings, fines or other penalties and other enforcement actions and result in damage to our reputation and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. These risks may grow should we increase our use of AI and machine-learning systems, which are subject to increasing litigation and regulatory scrutiny, and may have errors or inadequacies that are not easily detectable. These systems may inadvertently reduce our efficiency, may involve unclear intellectual property rights or interests, or may cause unintentional or unexpected outputs that are incorrect, do not align with our brand or business goals, or do not comply with our policies or applicable legal requirements. Any errors or vulnerabilities discovered in our code after release could also result in damage to our reputation, loss of pet parents and pet care providers, loss of revenue, or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our growth prospects and our business.
Our fee structure is impacted by a number of factors and ultimately may not be successful in attracting and retaining pet parents and pet care providers.
Demand for our platform is highly sensitive to a range of factors, including the prices that pet care providers set for their services, the level of potential earnings required to attract and retain pet care providers, and the fees we charge pet care providers and pet parents. Many factors, including operating costs, legal and regulatory requirements, constraints or changes and our current and future competitors’ pricing and marketing strategies, could significantly affect our pricing strategies. Existing or future competitors offer, or may in the future offer, lower-priced or a broader range of offerings. Similarly, certain competitors may use marketing strategies that enable them to attract or retain pet parents or pet care providers at a lower cost than us. There can be no assurance that we will not be forced, through competition, regulation, or otherwise, to reduce the fees charged to pet care providers and pet parents, or to increase marketing and other expenses to attract and retain pet parents and pet care providers in response to competitive pressures.
We have launched and may in the future launch new fee strategies or modify existing fee strategies, any of which may not ultimately be successful in attracting and retaining pet parents and pet care providers. For example, during 2023, we shifted all legacy pet parents in the United States and Canada to the 11% fee structure that we implemented for new pet parents in 2021, the majority of whom were at the legacy 7% fee rates. Further, pet parents’ price sensitivity may vary by geographic location. In particular, our continued international expansion may require us to change our fee structure and to adjust to different cultural norms in different locales, which efforts may not be successful. While we attempt to set fees based on prior operating experience and pet parent and pet care provider feedback and engagement levels, our assessments may not be accurate. In addition, if the offerings on our platform change, then we may need to revise our fee structures.
The business and industry in which we participate are highly competitive and we may be unable to compete successfully with our current or future competitors.
We operate in a highly competitive environment and face significant competition in attracting pet care providers and pet parents. Pet parents have a range of options to find and book pet care offerings, both online and offline. We believe that our competitors include:
•friends, family and neighbors that pet parents go to for pet care within their personal networks;
•local independent operators;
•large, commercial providers such as kennels and daycares;
•online aggregators and directories, such as Craigslist, Nextdoor, and Yelp; and
•other digital marketplaces, including Wag and the pet care offerings on Care.com in the United States, small operators such as Gudog and Pawshake outside of the United States, and TrustedHousesitters in and outside the United States.
In addition, other companies with significantly greater resources than ours may enter the industry and we may not effectively compete against them.
We believe that our ability to compete effectively depends upon many factors both within and beyond our control, including:
•the popularity and adoption of online marketplaces to obtain services from individual pet care providers;
•the popularity, utility, ease of use, performance and reliability of our offerings compared to those of our competitors;
•our ability to successfully adapt to or integrate new technologies, such as AI;
•the effectiveness and efficiency of our marketing efforts and those of our competitors;
•our reputation and brand strength relative to our competitors;
•the prices of offerings and the fees we charge pet care providers and pet parents on our platform;
•our ability to attract and retain qualified pet care providers and pet parents;
•the perceived safety and cleanliness of offerings on our platform;
•cancellation policies;
•our ability, and the ability of our competitors, to develop new offerings and make acquisitions and investments;
•our ability to establish and maintain relationships with partners;
•changes mandated by, or that we elect to make to address, legislation, regulatory authorities or litigation, including settlements, judgments, injunctions and consent decrees;
•our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented employees;
•our ability to raise additional capital; and
•acquisitions or consolidation within our industry.
Currently, our primary competition is from the friends, family and neighbors to whom pet parents often turn for pet care services within their personal networks. Given that online marketplaces offering pet care services are a relatively nascent business model and are rapidly evolving, reliance on personal networks is still prevalent. Current and potential competitors (including any new entrants into the market) may enjoy substantial competitive advantages over us, such as greater name recognition, longer operating histories, greater category share in certain markets, market-specific knowledge, established relationships with local pet parents and pet care providers and larger existing user bases in certain markets, more successful and efficient marketing capabilities and substantially greater financial, technical and other resources than we have. Competitors may be able to provide pet parents with a better or more complete experience and respond more quickly and effectively than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies (like AI), standards, or pet care provider and pet parent requirements or preferences.
The pet care industry also may experience significant consolidation or the entrance of new players. Some of our competitors have adopted and could further adopt aspects of our business model, which could affect our ability to differentiate our offerings from competitors. Increased competition could result in reduced demand for our platform from pet care providers and pet parents, slow our global growth and materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Consolidation among our competitors could give them increased scale and may enhance their capacity, abilities and resources and lower their cost structures. In addition, emerging start-ups may be able to innovate and focus on developing a new product or service faster than we can or may foresee consumer need for new offerings or technologies before we do.
New offerings and initiatives can be costly and if we unsuccessfully pursue such offerings and initiatives, we may fail to grow and our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects would be materially adversely affected.
We have invested, and plan to continue to invest, in new offerings and initiatives that differentiate us from our competitors. For example, during 2022 we acquired GoodPup, an early-stage company that operates a virtual dog training platform, and made a small investment in an early-stage company with a complementary service offering, and have increased investment in The Dog People, our pet-related blog, and The Rover Store, which offers Rover-branded merchandise for sale alongside third-party merchandise. In 2023, we launched Rover Gear, our first line of dog walking products and everyday essentials for pet parents. Developing new offerings increases our expenses and organizational complexity and we have and may continue to experience difficulties in developing these new offerings.
Our new offerings have a high degree of risk, as they may involve unproven businesses with which we have limited or no prior development or operating experience. There can be no assurance that consumer demand for such offerings will exist or be sustained at the levels that we anticipate, that we will be able to successfully manage the development and delivery of such offerings, or that any of these offerings will gain sufficient market acceptance to generate sufficient revenue to offset associated expenses or liabilities. For example, we previously introduced, then later deactivated, an on-demand dog walking offering and a grooming offering and recently recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $6.9 million related to our acquisition of GoodPup (see Note 8—Goodwill and Intangible Assets in Part I, Item 1 of this report). It is also possible that offerings developed by others will render our offerings noncompetitive or obsolete. If we do not realize the expected benefits of our product and other investments, we may fail to grow and our business, operating results and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.
We rely on online search engines to drive traffic to our platform to grow revenue and if we are unable to drive traffic cost-effectively, it would materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our success depends in part on our ability to attract pet care providers and pet parents through unpaid internet search results on search engines. The vast majority of our unpaid internet search results comes from a single search platform. The number of pet care providers and pet parents that we attract to our platform from search engines is due in large part to how and where our website ranks in unpaid search results. These rankings can be affected by many factors, some of which are under our direct control that we may not execute effectively to retain prominent enough search rankings, but many of which are not under our direct control and may change frequently. For example, online search engines have adapted and may continue to adapt their ranking algorithms to respond to the growing use of artificially-generated content, resulting in their increased scrutiny of our listings and a negative impact on our search rankings. As a result, links to our website or mobile applications may not be prominent enough to drive traffic to our website and we may not know how or otherwise be able to influence the results. In some instances, search engine companies may change these rankings in a way that promotes their own competing products or services or the products or services of one or more of our competitors. Search engines may also adopt a more aggressive auction-pricing system for paid search keywords that would cause us to incur higher advertising costs or reduce our market visibility to prospective pet parents. Search engines may also continue to expand their voice and AI capabilities resulting in unpredictable search result preferences and outcomes. Any reduction in the number of pet care providers and pet parents directed to our platform due to search engines ranking our listings lower than they currently do could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Further, we have used performance marketing products offered by search engines and social media platforms to distribute paid advertisements that drive traffic to our platform. A critical factor in attracting pet care providers and pet parents to our platform has been how prominently offerings are displayed in response to search queries for key search terms. The success of pet care services logistics and our brand has at times led to increased costs for relevant keywords as our competitors competitively bid on our keywords, including our brand name. We may not be successful in our efforts to drive traffic growth cost-effectively. If we are not able to effectively increase our traffic growth without increases in spend on performance marketing, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Maintaining and enhancing our brand reputation is critical to our growth and negative publicity could damage our brand, thereby harming our ability to compete effectively, which could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
Maintaining and enhancing our brand reputation is critical to our ability to attract pet care providers, pet parents and employees, to compete effectively, to preserve and deepen the engagement of our existing pet care providers, pet parents and employees, to maintain and improve our standing in the communities where pet care providers operate, including our standing with community leaders and regulatory bodies, and to mitigate legislative or regulatory scrutiny, litigation and government investigations. We are heavily dependent on the perceptions of pet care providers and pet parents who use our platform to help make word-of-mouth recommendations that contribute to our growth. Negative perception of our platform or company may harm our reputation, brand and local network effects and could potentially lead to increased regulatory or litigation exposure, including as a result of:
•complaints or negative publicity (media reports, social media posts, and blogs) about us, our platform, pet parents, pet care providers, our third-party background check provider, third-party identity verification provider, or our policies and guidelines;
•illegal, negligent, reckless, or otherwise inappropriate behavior by pet care providers, pet parents or third parties;
•actual or rumored injuries or other incidents involving the safety or security of pets, pet care providers, pet parents, or other members of the public, including incidents that are mistakenly attributed to us and any resulting media coverage;
•a pandemic or an outbreak of disease, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, in which constituents of our network become infected;
•fraudulent activity and transactions on our platform;
•frequent or last-minute cancellations by pet care providers or pet parents;
•actual or perceived disruptions or defects in our platform, such as site outages, payment disruptions, privacy or data security breaches, other security incidents, or other actual or perceived incidents that may impact the reliability of our services;
•litigation over, or investigations by regulators into, our platform;
•users’ lack of awareness of, or compliance with, our policies;
•changes to our platform policies that users or others perceive as overly restrictive, permissive, unclear, or inconsistent with our values or mission;
•failure to enforce our policies in a manner that users perceive as effective, fair and transparent;
•an actual or perceived failure to comply with legal, tax and regulatory requirements;
•a failure, or perceived failure, to act responsibly in a number of areas, including animal welfare, safety, data security, privacy and data protection, diversity and non-discrimination, concerns relating to the “gig” economy, litigation and response to regulatory activity and local communities;
•our current and future business partners or involvement with companies in which we have investments;
•a failure to operate our business in a way that is consistent with our values and mission;
•inadequate, untimely or unsatisfactory user support experiences or resolutions;
•illegal or otherwise inappropriate behavior by our management team or other employees or contractors;
•negative responses by pet parents or pet care providers to new services on our platform or other offerings;
•a failure to register our trademarks and prevent or defend against misappropriation or third-party challenges to our existing or new trademarks;
•negative perception of our treatment of employees, pet parents, pet care providers, or of our response to employee, pet parents and pet care provider sentiment related to political or social causes or actions of management; or
•any of the foregoing with respect to our competitors, to the extent such resulting negative perception affects the public’s perception of us or our industry.
For example, as a result of past complaints and negative publicity, some pet care providers and pet parents have refrained from, and may in the future refrain from, offering services through our platform or using our platform.
In addition, we rely on pet parents to provide trustworthy reviews and ratings that other pet parents may rely upon to help decide whether or not to book a particular offering. We rely on these reviews to further strengthen trust among members of our community. Users of our platform may be less likely to rely on reviews and ratings if they believe that our review system does not generate trustworthy reviews and ratings. We have procedures in place to combat fraud or abuse of our review system, but cannot guarantee that these procedures are or will be effective. An actual or perceived failure of our review system could reduce trust within our community and damage our brand reputation and could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
Actions by pet care providers or pet parents that are criminal, violent, inappropriate, dangerous, or fraudulent may undermine the safety or the perception of safety of our platform and materially adversely affect our reputation, our ability to attract and retain pet care providers and pet parents, business, operating results and financial condition.
We have no control over or ability to predict the specific actions of our users and other third parties during the time that pets or pet parents are with pet care providers or otherwise and cannot guarantee the safety of pets, pet care providers, pet parents and third parties. The actions of pets, pet care providers, pet parents and other third parties may result in pet and human injuries, fatalities, fraud, invasion of privacy, property damage, discrimination, or other harms, which have created and could continue to create brand reputational damage and potential legal or other substantial liabilities for us.
All new pet care providers on our platform in the United States and Canada undergo third-party background checks before they can offer their services on our platform. U.S. pet care providers are checked against national criminal offense databases, sex offender registries and certain regulatory, terrorist and sanctions watchlists. Any pet care provider in North America who creates a new profile is required to complete an enhanced background check. These enhanced checks are more comprehensive and include a manual search of county-level databases. In the United Kingdom and Western Europe, we use a third party to conduct identity verification on all pet care providers. Pet care provider profiles in all geographies are also subject to review and approval by our team of pet care provider specialists.
We do not verify the identity of, or require background checks for, pet parents, nor do we verify or require background checks for third parties who may be present during a service made through our platform. In addition, we do not currently and may not in the future require pet care providers to re-verify their identity or undergo subsequent background checks following the successful completion of their initial screening process. If a pet care provider engages in criminal activity after the third-party background check has been conducted, we may not be informed of such criminal activity and this pet care provider may continue offering services through our platform. If we choose to engage in more frequent background checks in the future, we may experience a decrease in pet care provider retention, which may adversely impact our platform.
Our screening processes rely on, among other things, information provided by pet care providers and pet parents, the ability to validate that information, the accuracy, completeness and availability of the underlying information relating to criminal records, the digitization of certain records, the evolving regulatory landscape in this area, such as relating to data privacy, data protection and criminal background screening, and the effectiveness of third-party service providers that may fail to conduct such background checks adequately or disclose information that could be relevant to a determination of eligibility. These processes are beneficial, but not exhaustive and have limitations. Background checks and identity verification checks have been and may in the future be, or be perceived to be, inaccurate, insufficiently inclusive of relevant records or otherwise inadequate or below expectations. As a result, pet care providers who otherwise would be barred from using our platform may be approved to offer services via our platform and some pet care providers may be inadvertently excluded from our platform. There can be no assurances that the screening measures we use will significantly reduce criminal or fraudulent activity on our platform.
In addition, we do not proactively independently verify the safety, suitability, location, quality, compliance with our policies or standards or legal compliance, of pet care providers’ offerings for individual pets and pet parents or the suitability, qualifications, or credentials of pet care providers. Where we have undertaken the verification or screening of certain aspects of pet care provider qualifications and offerings, the scope of such processes may be limited and rely on, among other things, information provided by pet care providers and the ability of our internal teams or third-party vendors to adequately conduct such verification or screening practices. In addition, we do not take steps to re-verify or re-screen pet care provider qualifications or offerings following initial review. We have relied in the past and may continue in the future to rely on pet care providers and pet parents to disclose information relating to their offerings and such information may be inaccurate or incomplete. We have created policies and standards to respond to issues reported with offerings, but certain offerings may pose heightened safety risks to individual users because those issues have not been reported to us or because our customer support team has not taken the requisite action based on our policies. We rely, at least in part, on reports of issues from pet care providers and pet parents to investigate and enforce many of our policies and standards. In addition, our policies may not contemplate certain safety risks posed by offerings or by individual pet care providers or pet parents or may not sufficiently address those risks.
We also have faced or may face civil litigation, regulatory investigations and inquiries involving allegations of, among other things, unsafe or unsuitable offerings, discriminatory policies, data processing, practices or behavior on and off our platform or by pet care providers, pet parents and third parties, general misrepresentations regarding the safety or accuracy of offerings on our platform and other pet care provider, pet parent, or third-party actions that are criminal, violent, inappropriate, dangerous, or fraudulent. While we recognize that we need to continue to build trust and invest in innovations that will support trust when it comes to our policies, tools and procedures to protect pet care providers, pet parents and the communities in which pet care providers operate, we may not be successful in doing so. Similarly, offerings that are inaccurate, of a lower than expected quality, or that do not comply with our policies may harm pet parents and public perception of the quality and safety of offerings on our platform and materially adversely affect our reputation, business, operating results and financial condition.
We have a limited operating history in an evolving industry, which makes it difficult to evaluate prospects and may increase the risk that we will not be successful.
We launched operations in 2011 and since then have increased the number of local markets in which we offer services (including Canada, the United Kingdom and Western Europe) and expanded our platform features and services. This limited operating history and our evolving business make it difficult to evaluate our prospects and the risks and challenges we may encounter. These risks and challenges include, amongst others disclosed in this “Risk Factors” section, our ability to: •accurately forecast our revenue and plan our operating expenses;
•increase the number of and retain existing pet parents and pet care providers that use our platform;
•successfully compete with current and future competitors;
•successfully expand our business in existing markets and enter new local markets and geographies;
•anticipate and respond to macroeconomic changes and changes in the markets in which we operate;
•maintain and enhance the value of our reputation and brand;
•adapt to rapidly evolving trends in the ways pet care providers and consumers interact with technology;
•avoid interruptions or disruptions in our service;
•develop a scalable, high-performance technology infrastructure that can efficiently and reliably handle increased usage, as well as the deployment of new features and services;
•hire, integrate and retain talented technology, marketing, customer service and other personnel;
•effectively manage rapid growth in our personnel and operations; and
•effectively manage our costs.
If we fail to address the risks and difficulties that we face, including those associated with the challenges listed above as well as those described elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
We may experience significant fluctuations in our operating results and key business metrics, which make it difficult to forecast future results and could cause our stock price to decline.
Our operating results and key business metrics may vary significantly and are not necessarily an indication of future performance. We experience seasonal fluctuations in key business metrics such as bookings and GBV, our operating results, including revenue, marketing and operations and support expenses, and net income (loss), and Adjusted EBITDA, which we expect to continue and which may become more extreme. Over the course of the year, we historically experience seasonally high bookings during the third quarter, which then step down slightly during the fourth quarter, and then stay approximately flat during the first quarter before ramping again in the second quarter. We usually experience stronger bookings, particularly for overnight boarding, house sitting, and drop-in services for cats, during the months of June, July, and August, and November and December, which in a typical year coincides with high travel demand related to summer and holiday travel, respectively. Bookings, GBV and revenue can also be impacted by the timing of holidays and other events.
Our operating results may fluctuate as a result of a variety of other factors, some of which are beyond our control such as macroeconomic and geopolitical trends and the impacts resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and non-COVID illnesses. Moreover, we base our expense levels and investment plans on estimates for revenue that may turn out to be inaccurate and we may not be able to adjust our spending quickly enough if our revenue is less than expected, resulting in losses that exceed our expectations. If our assumptions regarding the risks and uncertainties that we use to plan our business are incorrect or change, or if we do not address these risks successfully, our operating results could differ materially from our expectations and our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Investors should not rely on our operating results for any previous period as any indication of operating results or growth in future periods.
We base our decisions regarding expenditures in new pet parent acquisition in part on our analysis of the GBV generated from pet parents that we acquired in prior periods. Our estimates and assumptions may not accurately reflect future results and we may not be able to recover pet parent acquisition costs.
Our success depends on our ability to attract pet parents in a cost-effective manner. Our decisions regarding investments in pet parent acquisition substantially depend upon our analysis of the revenue generated from pet parents acquired in earlier periods. Our analysis regarding pet parent acquisition investment and revenue includes several assumptions. For example:
•We make various assumptions based on our historical data with respect to the rebooking rates of pet parents.
•While we believe the trends reflected by our various pet parent cohorts are illustrative of our pet parent base, the results of particular cohorts inherently reflect a distinct group of pet parents and may not be representative of our current or future composite group of pet parents or other monthly cohorts during a given year, particularly as we grow, our pet parent base broadens and we expand to new local markets.
•Our analysis focuses on support and acquisition marketing expenses incurred during the period in which the pet parents were originally acquired and makes various assumptions with respect to the level of additional marketing or other expenses necessary to maintain pet parent loyalty and generate booking activity in subsequent periods.
If our assumptions regarding our pet parent cohort behaviors, acquisition investment and resulting revenue from bookings, including those relating to the effectiveness of our marketing expenditures, prove incorrect, our ability to generate revenue from our investments in new pet parent acquisitions may be less than we have assumed and less than we have experienced in the past. As a result, we may need to adjust expenses or otherwise alter our strategy and our business, financial condition and operating results may be materially adversely affected.
If the use of our platform in large metropolitan areas is negatively affected, our financial results and future prospects could be adversely impacted.
We derive a significant portion of our bookings and historically have generated a significant portion of our growth in more densely populated urban areas. Our business and financial results may be susceptible to economic, social and regulatory conditions or other circumstances that tend to impact such areas. An economic downturn, increased competition, or regulatory obstacles in these areas could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results to a much greater degree than would the occurrence of such events in other areas. Further, we expect to continue to face challenges in penetrating lower-density suburban and rural areas, where our network is smaller and finding matches is more difficult, the cost of pet ownership is lower, and alternative pet care providers may be more convenient. If we are not successful in penetrating suburban and rural areas, or if we are unable to operate in certain key metropolitan areas in the future, our ability to serve what we consider to be our total addressable market would be limited and our business, financial condition and operating results would suffer.
Risks Related to Regulation and Taxation
If pet care providers are reclassified as employees under applicable law or new laws are passed causing the reclassification of pet care providers as employees or otherwise adopting employment-like restrictions with regard to pet care providers who use our platform, our business would be materially adversely affected.
We are subject to claims, lawsuits, arbitration proceedings, administrative actions, government investigations and administrative audits, and other legal and regulatory proceedings at the U.S. federal, state and municipal levels challenging the classification of pet care providers that use our platform as independent contractors. We may also become subject to similar claims and audits in Canada, the United Kingdom and Western Europe, or other international geographies where we may offer our platform in the future.
For example, representative actions, including actions under California’s Private Attorney General Act, or PAGA, have been filed against us alleging that we misclassified pet care providers in California as independent contractors in violation of the California Labor Code. In one of the actions, Melanie Sportsman v. A Place for Rover, Inc., the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, granted our motion for summary judgment and entered judgment in our favor, but the plaintiff appealed the court’s dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. We entered into a settlement agreement with the named plaintiff pursuant to which we made a total payment of $18.0 million in full and final settlement of all claims that the named plaintiff and members of a settlement class brought or could have brought in the litigation. The settlement terms do not require us to reclassify pet care providers in California as employees, and in agreeing to the settlement terms we did not admit to any wrongdoing or liability. See Part I, Item 1, Note 9—Commitments and Contingencies—Litigation and Other Contingencies for a more detailed discussion.
In addition, we are currently involved in administrative audits with state employment agencies, including audits related to pet care provider classification. For example, the Washington State Department of Labor & Industries, or L&I, opened an audit that resulted in a determination that pet care providers who use the Rover platform are “covered workers” for purposes of workers’ compensation coverage and made an assessment against us for alleged premium contributions, penalties, and interest owed for calendar year 2017. We prevailed on four successive appeals of this assessment, most recently to the Washington State Court of Appeals, which affirmed a State of Washington Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals decision that pet care providers who use the Rover platform are, at most, independent contractors. In October 2023, the Washington Supreme Court declined to grant L&I’s petition for review of the Washington State Court of Appeals decision leaving that decision intact. Previously, L&I had opened a second workers’ compensation audit covering the second quarter of 2019 through the first quarter of 2022. It remains to be seen whether this second audit will continue.
The tests governing whether a service provider is an independent contractor or an employee vary by governing law and are typically highly fact sensitive. Laws and regulations that govern the status and classification of independent contractors are subject to changes and divergent interpretations by various authorities, which can create uncertainty and unpredictability for us. We maintain that pet care providers who use the Rover platform are our customers and, as such, are at most independent contractors, and we intend to continue to defend ourselves vigorously in these matters. Nevertheless, there can be no guarantee that our defenses will be successful in all jurisdictions, and pet care providers may be reclassified as employees, especially in light of the evolving rules and restrictions on service provider classification and their potential impact on participants in the “gig economy.” In the United States, national, state and local governmental authorities have enacted or pursued and may in the future enact and pursue, measures designed to regulate the gig economy. For example, in 2021, the U.S. Secretary of Labor expressed his view that in some cases “gig workers should be classified as employees” and that further review was ongoing. In 2022, the United States Department of Labor, or DOL, released a proposed rule regarding the classification of employees and independent contractors under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. The proposed rule would implement new interpretative guidance for classification of workers if and when the rule is adopted. In 2019, the California Assembly passed AB-5, which codified a narrow worker classification test that has had the effect of treating many “gig economy” workers as employees. AB-5 includes a referral agency exemption that specifically applies to animal services and dog walking and grooming. While we believe that pet care providers who use the Rover platform fall within such exemption, interpretation or enforcement of the exemption varies. In addition, other jurisdictions (including in international geographies where we offer, or in the future may offer, our platform) could pursue similar laws that do not include such exemptions and which, if applied to our platform, could adversely impact our platform’s availability and our business.
The costs associated with defending, settling, or resolving pending and future lawsuits (including demands for arbitration) and governmental audits relating to the classification of pet care providers have been and may continue to be material to our business. Furthermore, costs and impacts to our business resulting from changes we may make to our platform and operations in order to ensure compliance with evolving legal frameworks may become material. For example, as a result of the Sportsman settlement agreement, we agreed to modify our platform to make certain changes applicable to pet care providers in California to bolster the classification of pet care providers who use the Rover platform as independent contractors under California law.
A reclassification of service providers as employees and claims or settlements of proceedings alleging misclassification could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results, including as a result of:
•monetary exposure arising from or relating to alleged failure to comply with tax withholding and payment obligations, wage and hour laws and requirements (such as those pertaining to unpaid wages and failure to pay minimum wage and overtime, to reimburse for expenses, or to provide required breaks and wage statements), including statutory and punitive damages, penalties and government fines;
•injunctions prohibiting continuance of existing business practices;
•claims for employee benefits (including equity incentives), social security, workers’ compensation and unemployment;
•claims of discrimination, harassment and retaliation under civil rights laws;
•claims under laws pertaining to unionizing, collective bargaining and other concerted activity;
•increasing our cost of doing business to a level that is unsustainable;
•other claims, charges, or proceedings under laws and regulations applicable to employers and employees, including risks relating to allegations of joint employer liability or agency liability; and
•harm to our reputation and brand.
In addition to the harms listed above, a reclassification of pet care providers as employees would require us to significantly alter our existing business model and operations (including by suspending, ceasing or curtailing operations in impacted jurisdictions) and impact our ability to add and retain pet care providers to our platform and grow our business, which we would expect to have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our business is subject to a variety of laws and regulations, many of which are unsettled and still developing, and failure to comply with such laws and regulations could subject us to claims or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or operating results.
Online marketplaces offering pet care services are a relatively nascent business model and are rapidly evolving. We are or may become subject to a variety of laws in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Western Europe, and other jurisdictions. Laws, regulations and standards governing issues such as worker classification, labor and employment, anti-discrimination, animal safety, home-based pet care licensing and regulation, online payments, gratuities, pricing and commissions, subscription services, intellectual property, background and identity verification checks, algorithm-based discrimination and tax are often complex and subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity. The scope and interpretation of these laws and whether they are applicable to us are often uncertain and may be conflicting, including varying standards and interpretations among countries, between state or province and federal law, between individual states or provinces and even at the city and municipality level. As a result, their application in practice may change or develop over time through judicial decisions or as new guidance or interpretations are provided by regulatory and governing bodies. We have been proactively working with state and local governments and regulatory bodies to ensure that our platform is available broadly.
Laws relating to the potential liability of providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties are currently being tested by a number of claims, including actions based on invasion of privacy and other torts, unfair competition, copyright and trademark infringement and other theories based on the nature and content of the materials searched, the ads posted, or the content provided by users. In addition, regulatory authorities in Europe and in the United States at the federal and state levels are considering a number of legislative and regulatory proposals concerning privacy and other matters that may be applicable to our business. It is also likely that if our business grows and evolves and our services are used in a greater number of geographies, we would become subject to laws and regulations in additional jurisdictions. It is difficult to predict how existing laws would be applied to our business and the new laws to which it may become subject.
In the United States, money transmission is subject to various state and federal laws and the rules and regulations are enforced by multiple authorities and governing bodies, including numerous federal, state and local agencies who may define money transmission differently. Outside of the United States, we are subject to additional laws, rules and regulations related to the provision of payments and financial services, and if we expand into new jurisdictions, the laws, regulations and regulators to which we are subject to will expand as well. Noncompliance with such regulations may subject us to fines or other penalties in one or more jurisdictions levied by federal or state or local regulators, including state Attorneys General, as well as those levied by foreign regulators. In addition to fines, penalties for failing to comply with applicable rules and regulations could include criminal and civil proceedings, forfeiture of significant assets or other enforcement actions. We could also be required to make changes to our business practices or compliance programs as a result of regulatory scrutiny. Recent financial, political and other events may increase the level of regulatory scrutiny on larger companies, technology companies in general, and companies engaged in dealings with independent service providers or otherwise viewed as part of the “gig economy.” Legislative, regulatory, and administrative bodies may enact new laws or promulgate new regulations that are adverse to our business, or they may view matters or interpret laws and regulations differently than they have in the past or in a manner adverse to our business, including by changing employment-related laws or by enacting employment-like regulations with regard to dual-sided marketplaces like our platform. In addition, regulatory scrutiny or action may create different or conflicting obligations on us from one jurisdiction to another, which creates additional challenges to managing our business.
Our success, or perceived success, and increased visibility may also drive some businesses that perceive our business model as a threat to their services or otherwise negatively to raise their concerns to local policymakers and regulators. These businesses and their trade association groups or other organizations may take actions and employ significant resources to shape the legal and regulatory regimes in jurisdictions where we may have, or seek to have, a market presence in an effort to change such legal and regulatory regimes in ways intended to adversely affect or impede our business and the ability of pet parents and pet care providers to use our platform.
If we are not able to comply with these laws or regulations or if we become liable under these laws or regulations, including any future laws or regulations that we may not be able to fully anticipate at this time, we could be materially adversely affected and we may be forced to implement new measures to reduce our exposure to this liability. This may require us to expend substantial resources or to discontinue certain services or platform features, which would adversely affect our business. Any failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could also subject us to claims and other legal and regulatory proceedings (including class, collective or other representative actions), fines, or other penalties, criminal and civil proceedings, forfeiture of significant assets and other enforcement actions. In addition, the increased attention to liability issues as a result of lawsuits and legislative proposals could adversely affect our reputation or otherwise impact the growth of our business. Any costs incurred to prevent or mitigate this potential liability are also expected to adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Government regulation of the Internet, mobile devices and e-commerce is evolving and unfavorable changes could substantially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We are subject to general business regulations and laws as well as regulations and laws specifically governing the Internet, mobile devices and e-commerce that are constantly evolving. Existing and future laws and regulations, or changes thereto, may impede the growth of the Internet, mobile devices, e-commerce, or other online services and increase the cost of providing online services, require us to change our business practices, or raise compliance costs or other costs of doing business. These regulations and laws, which continue to evolve, may address taxation, tariffs, privacy, data retention and protection, data security, pricing and commissions, content, copyrights, distribution, social media marketing, advertising practices (including targeted ads and behavioral advertising), sweepstakes, mobile, electronic contracts and other communications, consumer protection, text messaging, Internet and mobile application access to our offerings and the characteristics and quality of online offerings, the provision of online payment services and the characteristics and quality of services. It is not always clear how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, sales, use and other taxes, libel and personal privacy apply to the Internet and e-commerce. In addition, as we continue to expand internationally, it is possible that foreign government entities may seek to censor content available on our mobile applications or website or may even attempt to block access to our mobile applications and website. Regulators and lawmakers increasingly are focused on web and mobile design practices called “dark patterns,” which they believe harm consumers by leading them to take actions they may not otherwise take, for example by obscuring or delaying presentation of additional fees during the online purchase process. This increased scrutiny has led to new laws in some states, such as California, regarding the display of prices and has led and may continue to lead to similar regulation at the federal level or in other markets where we operate. Compliance with these laws could render some of our business practices less effective or more costly to maintain, and any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with any of these laws or regulations could result in damage to our reputation and brand, a loss in business and proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities or others, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We are subject to regulatory inquiries, claims, lawsuits, investigations, various proceedings and other disputes and face potential liability and expenses for legal claims, which could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
We are or may become subject to claims, lawsuits, arbitration proceedings, government investigations and other legal, regulatory and administrative proceedings, including those involving pet or personal injury, death or illness, property damage, worker classification, pay model, labor and employment, unemployment insurance benefits, workers’ compensation, anti-discrimination, commercial disputes, competition, pet care provider and pet parent complaints, intellectual property disputes, compliance with regulatory requirements, data security, advertising practices, tax issues, products liability and other matters, and we may become subject to additional types of claims, lawsuits, government investigations and legal or regulatory proceedings as our business grows and as we acquire or deploy new products and services.
We have in the past been, are currently, and may in the future be the subject of regulatory and administrative investigations, audits and inquiries conducted by federal, state, or local governmental agencies. Results of investigations, audits and inquiries and related governmental action are inherently unpredictable and, as such, there is always the risk of an investigation, audit, or inquiry having a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and operating results, particularly if an investigation, audit, or inquiry results in a lawsuit or unfavorable regulatory enforcement or other action. Regardless of outcome, these matters can have an adverse impact on us in light of the costs associated with cooperating with, or defending against, such matters and the diversion of management resources and other factors.
We are also subject to claims, lawsuits and other legal proceedings seeking to hold us vicariously liable for the actions of pets, pet parents and pet care providers. In the ordinary course of business, our Trust and Safety team receives claims pursuant to the Rover Guarantee, as well as claims and threats of legal action that arise from pet sitting services booked through the Rover website or applications. Various parties have from time to time claimed and may claim in the future, that we are liable for damages related to accidents or other incidents involving pets, pet parents, pet care providers and third parties. For example, third parties have asserted legal claims against us in connection with personal injuries related to pet or human safety issues or accidents caused by pet care providers or animals. We have incurred expenses to settle personal injury claims, which we sometimes choose to settle for reasons including implementation of the Rover Guarantee, customer goodwill, expediency, protection of our reputation and to prevent the uncertainty of litigating. We expect that such expenses will continue to increase as our business grows and faces increasing public scrutiny. Pending or threatened legal proceedings could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, or operating results. Regardless of the outcome of any legal proceeding, any injuries to, or deaths of, any pet parents, pet care providers, animals, or third parties could result in negative publicity and harm to our brand, reputation, business, financial condition and operating results.
We face potential liability and expense for claims relating to the information that we publish on our website and mobile applications, including claims for trademark and copyright infringement, defamation, libel and negligence, among others. Our platform also relies upon content that is created and posted by pet care providers, pet parents, or other third parties. Claims of defamation, disparagement, negligence, warranty, personal harm, intellectual property infringement, or other alleged damages could be asserted against us, in addition to pet care providers and pet parents. While we rely on a variety of statutory and common-law frameworks and defenses, including those provided by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Communications Decency Act, or CDA, the fair-use doctrine in the United States and the E-Commerce Directive in the European Union, differences between statutes, limitations on immunity, requirements to maintain immunity and moderation efforts in the many jurisdictions in which we operate may affect our ability to rely on these frameworks and defenses, or create uncertainty regarding liability for information or content uploaded by pet care providers and pet parents or otherwise contributed by third-parties to our platform. Moreover, regulators in the United States and in other countries may introduce new regulatory regimes, such as a potential repeal or amendment of CDA Section 230, that increase potential liability for information or content available on our platform. For example, in the United States, laws such as the CDA, which have previously been interpreted to provide substantial protection to interactive computer service providers, may change and become less predictable or unfavorable by legislative action or juridical interpretation. There have been various federal legislative efforts to restrict the scope of the protections available to online platforms under the CDA, in particular with regards to Section 230 of the CDA, and current protections from liability for third-party content in the United States could decrease or change. We could incur significant costs investigating and defending such claims and, if we are found liable, significant damages.
The results of any such claims, lawsuits, arbitration proceedings, government investigations, or other legal or regulatory proceedings cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty. Any claims against us, whether meritorious or not, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, be harmful to our reputation, require significant management attention and divert significant resources. Determining reserves for our pending litigation is a complex and fact-intensive process that requires significant subjective judgment and speculation. It is possible that a resolution of one or more such proceedings could result in substantial damages, settlement costs, fines and penalties that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. These proceedings could also result in harm to our reputation and brand, sanctions, consent decrees, injunctions, or other orders requiring a change in our business practices. Further, under certain circumstances, we have contractual and other legal obligations to indemnify and to incur legal expenses on behalf of our business and commercial partners and current and former directors and officers.
Our use of arbitration and class action waiver provisions subjects us to reputational risks and may not be enforceable, which could increase our litigation costs and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We include arbitration and class action waiver provisions in our terms of service with the pet parents and pet care providers that use our platform. These provisions are intended to streamline the litigation process for all parties involved, as they can in some cases be faster and less costly than litigating disputes in state or federal court. However, the use of arbitration and class action waiver provisions subjects us to certain risks to our reputation and brand, as these provisions have been the subject of increasing public scrutiny. In addition, individual arbitrations can be costly, and certain litigation tactics embraced by plaintiff’s lawyers, such as filing mass arbitration requests, can undermine the cost effectiveness of arbitration. Frequent reliance on arbitration provisions could also subject us to mass arbitration actions. In order to minimize these risks, we may choose to limit our use of arbitration and class action waiver provisions or be required to do so in a legal or regulatory proceeding, either of which could cause an increase in our litigation costs and exposure. Additionally, we permit certain users of our platform to opt out of such provisions, which could also cause an increase in our litigation costs and exposure.
Further, with the potential for conflicting rules regarding the scope and enforceability of arbitration and class action waivers on a state-by-state basis, as well as between state, federal and international law, there is a risk that some or all of our arbitration and class action waiver provisions could be subject to challenge or may need to be revised to exempt certain categories of protection. If these provisions were found to be unenforceable, in whole or in part, or specific claims are required to be exempted, we could experience an increase in our costs to litigate disputes and the time involved in resolving such disputes and we could face increased exposure to potentially costly lawsuits, each of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We are subject to governmental economic and trade sanctions laws and regulations which could result in liability and negatively affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
We are required to comply with economic and trade sanctions and export controls administered by governments where we operate, including the U.S. government (including without limitation regulations administered and enforced by the U.S. Office
of Foreign Assets Control, or OFAC, and the U.S. Department of Commerce), the Council of the European Union and the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation of His Majesty’s Treasury in the United Kingdom, or OFSI. These economic and trade sanctions prohibit or restrict transactions to or from or dealings with certain specified countries, regions, their governments and, in certain circumstances, their nationals and with individuals and entities that are specially-designated, such as individuals and entities included on OFAC’s List of Specially Designated Nationals, or SDN List), subject to EU/UK asset freezes, or other sanctions measures. For example, as a result of Russia’s military action in Ukraine, governmental authorities in the United States, the European Union, and the United Kingdom, among others, launched an expansion of coordinated sanctions and export control measures, including sanctions against certain individuals and entities and prohibiting or limiting certain financial and commercial transactions. Any future economic and trade sanctions imposed in jurisdictions where we have significant business could materially adversely impact our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our ability to track and verify transactions and otherwise to comply with these regulations requires a high level of internal controls. We maintain policies and procedures to implement these internal controls, which we periodically assess and update to the extent we identify compliance gaps. Our internal policies and procedures require that we report to OFAC on payments we have rejected or blocked pursuant to OFAC sanctions regulations and on any possible violations of those regulations. Our policies also require that we report to OFSI on dealings with persons subject to EU/UK sanctions. There is a risk that, despite the internal controls that we have in place, we may have inadvertently engaged in or could in the future engage in dealings with persons sanctioned under applicable sanctions laws and that our internal controls could be less than fully effective at implementing the new and any possible future sanctions that relate to Russia’s military action in Ukraine. Any non-compliance with economic and trade sanctions laws and regulations or related investigations could result in claims or actions against us and materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
We are subject to various U.S. and international anti-corruption laws and other anti-bribery and anti-kickback laws and regulations.
We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or the FCPA, and other anti-corruption, anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws in the jurisdictions in which we do business, both domestic and abroad. These laws generally prohibit us and our employees from improperly influencing government officials or commercial parties in order to obtain or retain business, direct business to any person, or gain any improper advantage. The FCPA and other applicable anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws also may hold us liable for acts of corruption and bribery committed by our third-party business partners, representatives and agents who are acting on our behalf. We and our third-party business partners, representatives and agents may have direct or indirect interactions with officials and employees of government agencies or state-owned or affiliated entities and we may be held liable for the corrupt or other illegal activities of these third-party business partners and intermediaries and our employees, representatives, contractors and agents, even if it does not explicitly authorize such activities.
These laws also require that we keep accurate books and records and maintain internal controls and compliance procedures designed to prevent any such actions. While we have policies and procedures to address compliance with such laws, we cannot assure that our employees and agents will not take actions in violation of our policies or applicable law, for which we may be ultimately held responsible and our exposure for violating these laws increases as our international presence expands and as we increase sales and operations in foreign jurisdictions. Any violation of the FCPA or other applicable anti-bribery, anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws could result in whistleblower complaints, adverse media coverage, investigations, imposition of significant legal fees, loss of export privileges, severe criminal or civil sanctions, or suspension or debarment from U.S. government contracts, substantial diversion of management’s attention, a drop in our stock price, or overall adverse consequences to our business, all of which may have an adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition and operating results.
Taxing authorities may successfully assert that we have not properly collected, or in the future should collect, sales and use, gross receipts, value-added, or similar taxes and may successfully impose additional obligations on us and any such assessments, obligations, or inaccuracies could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
The application of non-income, or indirect, taxes, such as sales and use tax, value-added tax, goods and services tax, business tax and gross receipt tax, to businesses like ours is a complex and evolving issue. Many of the fundamental statutes and regulations that impose these taxes were established before the adoption and growth of the Internet and e-commerce. Significant judgment is required on an ongoing basis to evaluate applicable tax obligations and as a result, amounts recorded are estimates and are subject to adjustments. In many cases, the ultimate tax determination is uncertain because it is not clear how new and existing statutes might apply to our business.
In addition, governments are increasingly looking for ways to increase revenue, which has resulted in discussions about tax reform and other legislative action to increase tax revenue, including through indirect taxes. Such taxes could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We are subject to indirect taxes, such as payroll, sales and use, value-added and goods and services taxes, and we may face various indirect tax audits in various U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. We believe that we remit indirect taxes in all relevant jurisdictions in which we generate taxable sales, based on our understanding of the applicable laws in those jurisdictions. However, tax authorities may raise questions about, or challenge or disagree with, our calculation, reporting, or collection of taxes and may require us to collect taxes in jurisdictions in which we do not currently do so or to remit additional taxes and interest and could impose associated penalties and fees. A successful assertion by one or more tax authorities requiring us to collect taxes in jurisdictions in which we do not currently do so or to collect additional taxes in a jurisdiction in which we currently do so, could result in substantial tax liabilities, including taxes on past sales, as well as penalties and interest, could discourage pet parents and pet care providers from utilizing our offerings, or could otherwise harm our business, financial condition and operating results. Further, even where we are collecting taxes and remitting them to the appropriate authorities, we may fail to accurately calculate, collect, report and remit such taxes. Additionally, where we or pet care providers try to pass along increased additional taxes and raise fees or prices to pet parents, booking volume may decline.
As a result of these and other factors, the ultimate amount of tax obligations owed may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and any such difference may adversely affect our operating results in future periods in which we change our estimate of tax obligations or in which the ultimate tax outcome is determined.
We may have exposure to greater than anticipated tax liabilities.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and certain foreign jurisdictions. Our effective tax rate could be materially adversely affected by changes in the mix of earnings and losses in countries with differing statutory tax rates, certain non-deductible expenses and the valuation of deferred tax assets. Increases in our effective tax rate would reduce profitability or increase losses. As we expand the scale of our international business activities, any changes to U.S. or international taxation of such activities may substantially increase our worldwide effective tax rate, lead to volatility with respect to tax expenses and liabilities from period to period, and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. For example, beginning in 2022, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminates the option to deduct research and development expenditures in the period incurred and requires taxpayers to capitalize and amortize such expenditures over five or fifteen years, as applicable, pursuant to Section 174 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. If the requirement to capitalize Code Section 174 expenditures is not modified, it may significantly impact our effective tax rate and cash tax liability to the extent we do not have sufficient Federal or state net operating losses and credit carryforwards, or to the extent our utilization of net operating loss carryforwards is limited. Further, the Inflation Reduction Act imposes a 1% excise tax on certain stock buybacks by publicly traded corporations, which will increase the costs associated with our stock repurchase program.
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD, and its member countries which includes the United States, have been focused for an extended period on issues related to the taxation of multinational corporations, such as the comprehensive plan set forth by the OECD to create an agreed set of international tax rules for preventing base erosion and profit shifting. The current framework for overhauling the taxation of multinational corporations includes, among other things, profit reallocation rules and a 15% global minimum corporate income tax rate. Similarly, the European Commission and several countries have issued proposals that would change various aspects of the current framework under which we are taxed. These proposals include changes to the existing framework to calculate income tax, as well as proposals to change or impose new types of non-income (including indirect) taxes, including taxes based on a percentage of revenue.
We have been subject to examination and may be subject to examination in the future, by federal, state, local and foreign tax authorities on income, employment, sales and other tax matters. For example, our eligibility to receive the employee retention credit remains subject to audit by the IRS for a period of five years. See Part I, Item 1, Note 7—Balance Sheet Components for more information. While we regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes from such examinations and the adequacy of our provision for taxes, there can be no assurance that such provision is sufficient and that a determination by a tax authority, such as if the IRS determines that we were not eligible to receive a portion or all of the ERC and we are required to return a portion or all of the ERC to the IRS, would not have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited, which could adversely impact our financial condition and operating results.
As of December 31, 2022, we had accumulated approximately $253.5 million, $135.6 million and $5.2 million of gross federal, state and non-U.S. net operating loss carryforwards, or NOLs, respectively. These NOLs are available to reduce future taxable income with approximately $74.1 million of gross federal NOLs beginning to expire in 2031 and gross state NOLs beginning to expire in 2028. Under the legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the Tax Act, as amended by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or the CARES Act, NOLs from taxable years that began after December 31, 2017 may offset no more than 80% of current year taxable income for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020. NOLs arising in taxable years ending after December 31, 2017 can be carried forward indefinitely, but NOLs generated in tax years ending before January 1, 2018 will continue to have a two-year carryback and 20-year carryforward period. It is possible that we will not generate sufficient taxable income in time to use some or all NOLs before their expiration.
Under Section 382 of the Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change NOLs to offset its post-change taxable income may be limited. In general, an “ownership change” will occur if there is a cumulative change in our ownership by “5 percent stockholders” that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. We have completed an analysis to determine whether we experienced a change in control within the meaning of Section 382 of the Code covering the period from inception through December 31, 2022. Based on our analysis, we concluded the identified ownership changes will not materially limit the net operating loss and research and development credits available to offset our tax liabilities. In the event we experience one or more ownership changes as a result of future stock transactions, our ability to use NOLs to reduce future taxable income and liabilities may be subject to annual limitations as a result of prior ownership changes and ownership changes that may occur in the future.
There is also a risk that our existing NOLs or tax credits could expire or otherwise be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities, either as the result of regulatory changes issued, possibly with retroactive effect, by various jurisdictions seeking to raise revenue, or for other unforeseen reasons.
We record, and may in the future record, significant valuation allowances on our deferred tax assets, and the recording and release of such allowances may have a material impact on our results of operations.
The need for a valuation allowance requires an assessment of both positive and negative evidence on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis when determining whether it is more-likely-than-not that deferred tax assets are recoverable. In making such an assessment, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. New facts and circumstances, historic profits or losses, and future financial results may require us to reevaluate our valuation allowance positions which could potentially affect our effective tax rate.
We continue to monitor the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets, including those for which a valuation allowance is recorded. There can be no assurance that we will generate profits in future periods enabling us to fully realize our deferred tax assets. We have recorded a valuation allowance on U.S. deferred tax assets, including Federal and state net operating loss and credit carryforwards, to the extent they are not realizable by utilizing deferred tax liabilities as sources of income. We intend to maintain the valuation allowance until there is sufficient evidence to support its reversal. The timing of recording a valuation allowance or the reversal of such valuation allowance is subject to objective factors that cannot be readily predicted in advance. Both the establishment of a valuation allowance and the reversal of a previously recorded valuation allowance may have a material impact on our financial results.
We expect to use a significant amount of cash to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with RSU vesting.
We must remit cash to relevant taxing authorities to satisfy obligations in respect to income taxes and social security contributions related to employee RSU vesting. Through 2022, we funded these obligations through “sell-to-cover” transactions, where shares with a market value equivalent to the tax withholding obligation were sold into the market. Beginning in 2023, we adopted a policy to use cash on our balance sheet to satisfy these obligations and withhold shares with a corresponding value from employees. Although this policy reduces stockholder dilution compared to “sell-to-cover” transactions, it does represent a significant use of cash and may adversely affect our financial condition. See “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Resources.”
We currently, and may in the future, have assets held at financial institutions that exceed the insurance coverage offered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the loss of which could have a severe negative affect on our operations and liquidity.
We, along with two of our subsidiaries, currently have a portion of our cash and cash equivalents held in operating and cash sweep accounts at First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company, or First Citizens Bank (f/k/a Silicon Valley Bridge Bank, N.A., or SVBB). On March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank, or SVB, a predecessor to SVBB and now a division of First Citizens Bank, was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, as receiver. On March 13, 2023, the FDIC, the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury announced that all assets held at SVB would be available to all customers commencing March 13, 2023. As of September 30, 2023, we had approximately $0.5 million on deposit with First Citizens Bank, which represented approximately 0.2% of our cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2023 and is considered immaterial to our liquidity. One of the deposit accounts at First Citizens Bank has an immaterial amount in excess of the insurance coverage offered by the FDIC, and we believe that the amounts in the cash sweep accounts at First Citizens Bank continue to be our assets and not the assets of First Citizens Bank. We are in the process of withdrawing our remaining assets from First Citizens Bank and moving such assets to be deposited in accounts at JPMorgan Chase and, to diversify further, potentially another financial institution of high credit quality.
In the future, we may maintain our cash assets at financial institutions in the U.S. in amounts that are in excess of the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000. There can be no assurance that any deposits in excess of the FDIC insurance limit will be backstopped by the U.S. Government, or that any bank or financial institution with which we do business will be able to obtain needed liquidity from other banks, government institutions or by acquisition in the event of a failure or liquidity crisis. In the event of a failure of any of these financial institutions where we maintain our deposits or other assets or a liquidity crisis, we may incur a loss to the extent such loss exceeds the FDIC insurance limitation, which could have a material adverse effect upon our liquidity, financial condition and our results of operations, or we may experience delays in accessing our accounts which could materially impact our ability to pay operational expenses or make other payments.
Risks Related to Privacy and Technology
We have been subject to cybersecurity attacks in the past and anticipate being the target of future attacks. Any actual or perceived breach of security or security incident or privacy or data protection breach or violation could interrupt our operations, harm our brand and reputation and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our business involves the collection, storage, processing and transmission of personal data and other sensitive and proprietary data of pet parents and pet care providers. Additionally, we maintain, and third-party service providers on our behalf maintain, sensitive and proprietary information relating to our business, such as our own proprietary information, other confidential information and personal data relating to individuals such as our employees. An increasing number of organizations, including those with significant online operations, have disclosed breaches of their systems and other information security incidents, some of which have involved sophisticated and highly targeted attacks. We, and our third-party service providers, have experienced and may in the future experience such attacks. In addition, these incidents can originate on our vendors’ systems, which can then be leveraged to access our systems, further preventing our ability to successfully identify and mitigate the attack.
The risks associated with a malicious insider compromising our information systems and infrastructure have grown in light of the greater adoption of remote work as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We also have a distributed community support organization including third-party providers that have access to personal data. Other companies have suffered incidents involving such insiders exfiltrating the personal data of customers, stealing corporate trade secrets and key financial metrics, and illegally diverting funds. No series of measures can fully safeguard against a sufficiently determined and skilled insider threat.
Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to or to sabotage information systems change frequently and may not be known until launched against us, we may be unable to anticipate or prevent these attacks, react in a timely manner, or implement adequate preventive measures, and we may face delays in our detection or remediation of, or other responses to, security breaches and other privacy-, data protection- and security-related incidents. In addition, users on our platform could have vulnerabilities on their own devices that are unrelated to our systems and platform but could mistakenly be attributed to us. Further, breaches experienced by other companies may also be leveraged against us. For example, credential stuffing attacks, which involve the automated injection of stolen username and password pairs into login forms in order to fraudulently gain access to user accounts, are increasingly common and sophisticated actors can mask their attacks, making them difficult to
identify and prevent. Bad actors using stolen credentials have directly targeted and may continue to directly target users of our platform with attempts to breach their Rover accounts, which have and can result in takeovers of their accounts for the purpose of perpetrating fraud against them, other users, or our platform. Users of our platform have experienced, and may continue to experience, incidents of fraud on our platform involving credential stuffing attacks and account takeovers, which we may not be able to detect or prevent. Victims of such takeovers may seek recovery from us or we may offer reimbursement of funds lost through fraud, and we have incurred and may continue to incur losses from claims by pet parents and pet care providers, which losses may be substantial. The ability of bad actors to cause an account takeover exposes us to financial fraud risk, including costly litigation, which is difficult to fully mitigate. We have taken and continue to take measures to detect and prevent or mitigate account takeovers and fraud, but these measures need to be continually improved and may add friction to our booking process, which could adversely impact bookings. These measures may also not be effective against fraud and illegal activities, particularly given new and continually evolving forms of circumvention. If these measures do not succeed in reducing fraud, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Although we have developed systems and processes that are designed to protect data of pet parents and pet care providers that use our platform, protect our systems and the proprietary, sensitive and confidential information we maintain, prevent data loss, and prevent other security breaches and security incidents, these security measures have not fully protected against such matters in the past and cannot guarantee security in the future, especially as attackers use AI and machine learning to launch more automated, targeted and coordinated attacks against targets. The IT and infrastructure used in our business may be vulnerable to cyberattacks or security breaches, and data, including personal data and other sensitive and proprietary data of pet parents and pet care providers, our employees’ personal data, or our other sensitive, confidential or proprietary data that our IT and infrastructure maintain or that otherwise is accessible through those systems may be rendered unavailable or subject to loss, compromise, or unauthorized use, disclosure, or other processing. Employee error, malfeasance, or other errors in the storage, use, or transmission of any of these types of data could result in an actual or perceived privacy, data protection, or security breach or other security incident. We also face the risk of computer viruses, ransomware, or other malware being introduced to such IT and infrastructure. Although we have policies and practices restricting access to the personal data we store, there is a risk that these policies may not be effective in all cases.
Any actual or perceived breach of privacy or data protection, or any actual or perceived security breach or other incident that impacts our platform or systems, other IT and infrastructure used in our business, or data maintained or processed in our business, could interrupt our operations, result in our platform being unavailable, result in loss or unavailability of, or improper access to, or acquisition, disclosure, or other processing of, data, result in fraudulent transfer of funds, harm our reputation, brand and competitive position, damage our relationships with third-party partners, result in significant claims, litigation, regulatory investigations and proceedings (including ongoing monitoring by regulators), fines, penalties, and increased credit card processing fees and other costs and liabilities, or result in the loss of pet parents’ and pet care providers’ confidence in, or decreased use of, our platform, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Any actual or perceived breach of privacy, data protection or security, or other security incident, impacting any entities with which we share or disclose data (including, for example, our third-party technology providers) could have similar effects. Further, any cyberattacks or actual or perceived security, privacy or data protection breaches and other incidents directed at, or suffered by, our competitors could reduce confidence in our industry and, as a result, reduce confidence in us.
We have incurred and will continue to incur significant costs in an effort to detect and prevent privacy, data protection and security breaches and other privacy-, data protection- and security-related incidents, and we may face increased costs and requirements to expend substantial resources if an actual or perceived privacy, data protection, or security breach or other incident occurs. While we maintain cyber insurance that may help provide coverage for these types of incidents, our insurance may not adequately cover costs and liabilities related to any incidents, and may not continue to be available to us on economically reasonable terms, or at all, and any insurer may deny coverage as to any future claim. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceed available insurance coverage or the occurrence of changes in our insurance policies, including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements, could adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations and financial condition.
Changes in laws or regulations relating to privacy, data protection, or the protection or transfer of data relating to individuals, or any actual or perceived failure by us to comply with such laws and regulations or any other obligations relating to privacy, data protection or the protection or transfer of data relating to individuals, could adversely affect our business.
We receive, transmit and store a large volume of personal information and other data relating to users on our platform, as well as personal information and other data relating to individuals such as our employees. Numerous local, municipal, state, federal and international laws and regulations address privacy and the collection, storing, sharing, use, disclosure and protection of
certain types of data, including the California Online Privacy Protection Act, Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act, Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation, the EU ePrivacy Directive, the EU General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or the TCPA, and similar state laws, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and other federal or state laws applicable to insurance producers, the Washington Biometric Law and similar state laws, Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, the California Privacy Rights Act, or CPRA, and similar laws in other states. For example, the TCPA and its state counterparts restrict certain telemarketing activities, including the use of automated SMS text messages without proper consent. This has resulted, and may in the future result, in civil claims against us. We could also face regulatory enforcement by federal and state agencies. These laws, rules and regulations evolve frequently and their scope may continually change, through new legislation, amendments to existing legislation and changes in enforcement and may be inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another.
For example, the GDPR, which became effective on May 25, 2018, has resulted and will continue to result in significant compliance burdens and costs for companies like ours. The GDPR regulates our collection, use, and other processing of personal data of European Union residents, referred to as personal data, and imposes stringent data protection requirements with significant penalties and the risk of civil litigation, for noncompliance. Failure to comply with the GDPR may result in fines of up to 20 million Euros or up to 4% of annual global revenue, whichever is greater. It may also lead to civil litigation, with the risks of damages or injunctive relief, or regulatory orders adversely impacting the ways in which our business can use personal data.
In addition, the United Kingdom has implemented legislation similar to the GDPR, referred to as the UK GDPR, which provides for fines of up to the greater of 17.5 million British Pounds and 4% of global turnover. Particularly as the United Kingdom undertakes to reform the UK GDPR, the relationship between the United Kingdom and the EU in relation to certain aspects of data protection law remains unclear, and these changes will lead to additional costs and increase our risk exposure. On June 28, 2021, the European Commission announced a decision of “adequacy” concluding that the United Kingdom ensures an equivalent level of data protection to the GDPR, providing some relief regarding the legality of continued personal data flows from the European Economic Area, or EEA, to the United Kingdom. Uncertainty remains, as this adequacy determination must be renewed after four years and may be modified or revoked in the interim. The United Kingdom’s previous statements about its intent to replace the UK GDPR cast the adequacy determination further into doubt.
Additionally, we are or may become subject to laws, rules and regulations regarding cross-border transfers of personal data, including those relating to transfer of personal data outside the EEA, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Ongoing legal developments have created complexity and uncertainty regarding transfers of personal data from these regions to the United States and other jurisdictions. For example, on July 16, 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union, or CJEU, invalidated the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework, or the Privacy Shield, under which personal data could be transferred from the EEA to U.S. entities that had self-certified under the Privacy Shield scheme. Although the European Commission recently adopted its adequacy decision for the new EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework, it may be challenged and invalidated again. While the CJEU previously upheld the adequacy of the standard contractual clauses (a standard form of contract approved by the European Commission as an adequate personal data transfer mechanism), it noted that reliance on them may not necessarily be sufficient in all circumstances. In addition to other mechanisms (particularly standard contractual clauses), in limited circumstances we may rely on Privacy Shield certifications of third parties (for example, vendors and partners). Continually evolving requirements, such as modifications to the standard contractual clauses by the European Commission or the United Kingdom’s Information Commissioner’s Office, have created uncertainty and increased the risk around our international operations. We may, in addition to other impacts, be required to review and amend the legal mechanisms by which we make or receive personal data transfers to the United States and other jurisdictions, to engage in new contract negotiations with third parties that aid in processing personal data on our behalf or localize certain personal data, to localize certain personal data, and to incur additional costs associated with increased compliance burdens.
As the enforcement landscape further develops, we could suffer additional costs, complaints and/or regulatory investigations or fines, have to stop using certain tools and vendors, and make other operational changes. If we are unable to transfer personal information between and among countries and regions in which we operate, it could affect the manner in which we provide our services, the geographical location or segregation of our relevant systems and operations, and could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The CCPA, as amended by the CPRA, among other things, requires covered companies to provide disclosures to California consumers and affords such consumers abilities to opt out of certain sharing and sales of personal information, including through user-enabled global privacy controls. The law also prohibits covered businesses from discriminating against consumers for exercising their CCPA rights. The CCPA imposes severe statutory damages as well as a private right of action for certain
data breaches. This private right of action is expected to increase the likelihood of, and risks associated with, data breach litigation. The CPRA further expands the CCPA with additional data privacy compliance requirements that may impact our business and establishes a regulatory agency dedicated to enforcing those requirements. In addition, other states have enacted and likely will continue to enact data privacy laws that may apply to us. For instance, the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act took effect on January 1, 2023, the Colorado Privacy Act and the Connecticut Data Privacy Act took effect July 1, 2023, and the Utah Consumer Privacy Act becomes effective on December 31, 2023. These laws have certain similarities, but include their own compliance requirements.
Aspects of the interpretation and enforcement of these laws remain uncertain. Comprehensive privacy laws have also been proposed in other states and at the federal level, reflecting a trend toward more stringent privacy legislation in the United States, with potentially greater penalties and more rigorous compliance requirements relevant to our business. The effects of such laws are significant and may require us to modify our data processing practices and policies and incur substantial compliance-related costs and expenses. Additionally, many laws and regulations relating to privacy and the collection, storing, sharing, use, disclosure, protection, and other processing of certain types of data are subject to varying degrees of enforcement and new and changing interpretations by courts. For example, we have received and may continue to receive claims regarding our use of third-party pixels under laws such as the California Invasion of Privacy Act, which could lead to costly litigation. Current or new laws or regulations, or evolving interpretations of their requirements, may require significant changes to our operations, our security measures and infrastructure, and our platform, or prevent us from providing our platform in jurisdictions in which we currently operate and in which we may operate in the future.
Additionally, we have incurred and may continue to incur significant expenses in an effort to comply with privacy, data protection and information security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards, or contractual obligations. For example, certain laws regulate the use of cookies and other tracking technologies, which limit the effectiveness of our marketing activities, impact our search engine rankings, divert technology personnel resources, increase costs, and subject us to additional liabilities. Furthermore, publication of our privacy statement and other policies regarding privacy, data protection and data security may subject us to investigation or enforcement actions by regulators if those statements or policies are found to be deficient, lacking transparency, deceptive, unfair, or misrepresentative of our practices. We are also bound by contractual obligations related to privacy, data protection and data security and our efforts to comply with such obligations may not be successful or may have other negative consequences. In particular, with such laws and regulations imposing new and relatively burdensome obligations and with substantial uncertainty over the interpretation and application of these and other laws and regulations, we may face challenges in addressing their requirements and making necessary changes to our policies and practices and may incur significant costs and expenses in an effort to do so.
Despite our efforts to comply, it is possible that our interpretations of the law, practices, or platform could be inconsistent with, or fail or be alleged to fail to meet all requirements of, applicable laws, regulations, or obligations. Our failure, or the failure by our third-party providers, pet parents, or pet care providers on our platform, or consequences associated with our efforts to comply with applicable laws or regulations or any other obligations relating to privacy, data protection, or information security, or any compromise of security that results in unauthorized access to, or use or release of data relating to pet care providers, pet parents or other individuals, or the perception that any of the foregoing types of failure or compromise has occurred, could damage our reputation, discourage new and existing pet care providers and pet parents from using our platform, or result in fines or other penalties, investigations, or proceedings by governmental agencies and private claims and litigation, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Even if not subject to legal challenge, the perception of concerns relating to privacy, data protection, or information security, whether or not valid, may harm our reputation and brand and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Systems defects and failures and resulting interruptions in the availability of our website, mobile applications, or platform could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our success depends on pet parents and pet care providers being able to access our platform at any time. Our systems, or those of third parties upon which we rely, may experience service interruptions or degradation or other performance problems because of hardware and software defects, bugs or malfunctions, distributed denial-of-service and other cyberattacks, infrastructure changes, human error, earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, fires, natural disasters, power losses, disruptions in telecommunications services, fraud, military or political conflicts, terrorist attacks, computer viruses, ransomware, malware, or other events. Our systems also may be subject to break-ins, sabotage, theft and intentional acts of vandalism, including by our own employees. Some of our systems are not fully redundant and our disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all eventualities. Our business interruption insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of our losses that may result from interruptions in our service as a result of systems failures and similar events.
We have experienced and will likely continue to experience system failures and other events or conditions from time to time that interrupt the availability or reduce or affect the speed or functionality of our platform. Minor interruptions can result in new pet parent acquisition losses that are never recovered. Affected users could seek monetary recourse from us for their losses and such claims, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming and costly for us to address. Further, in some instances, we may not be able to identify the cause or causes of these performance problems within an acceptable period of time. Any failure to maintain performance, reliability, speed, security, and availability of our platform, services, and technical infrastructure to the satisfaction of pet parents and pet care providers may harm our business and reputation and our ability to retain existing, and attract new, pet parents and pet care providers.
We primarily rely on Amazon Web Services to deliver our services to users on our platform and any disruption of or interference with our use of Amazon Web Services could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We currently rely on Amazon Web Services, or AWS, to host our platform and support our operations. We do not have control over the operations of the facilities of AWS that we use. The facilities of AWS are vulnerable to damage or interruption from natural disasters, extreme heat or cold spells or other adverse weather events, cybersecurity attacks, terrorist attacks, power outages and similar events or acts of misconduct. Our platform’s continuing and uninterrupted performance is critical to our success. We have experienced, and expect that in the future we will experience, interruptions, delays and outages in service and availability from time to time due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, human or software errors, website hosting disruptions and capacity constraints. In addition, any changes in AWS’ service levels may adversely affect our ability to meet the requirements of users on our platform.
As our platform’s continuing and uninterrupted performance is critical to our success, sustained or repeated system failures would reduce the attractiveness of our platform. It may become increasingly difficult to maintain and improve our performance, especially during peak usage times, as we expand the usage of our platform. Any of the above circumstances or events may harm our reputation and brand, reduce the availability or usage of our platform, lead to a significant short-term loss of revenue, increase our costs and impair our ability to attract new users, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We rely on third-party payment service providers to process payments on our platform. If these third-party payment service providers become unavailable or insolvent, are subject to cybersecurity attacks, or we are subject to increased fees, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
We rely on several third-party payment service providers, including payment card networks, banks, payment processors and payment gateways, to link us to payment card and bank clearing networks to process payments made by pet parents and payments made to pet care providers through our platform. We also rely on these third-party providers to address our compliance with various laws, including money transmission regulations. For example, we rely on a sole credit card processor for payments by pet parents, and they are also the primary payment processor for pet care provider payments. If this provider or our other third-party payment service providers fail to perform adequately, become unwilling or unable to provide these services to us on acceptable terms, fail to transmit payments owed to us or pet care providers in a timely manner or at all, become insolvent or enter bankruptcy, suffer successful cybersecurity attacks, or regulators take action against them or us, our business may be substantially disrupted and pet parents’ ability to make payments and pet care providers’ ability to receive payments will be negatively impacted. In such case, we would need to find an alternate payment service provider and we may not be able to secure similar terms or replace such payment service provider in an acceptable time frame. If we need to migrate to alternative or integrate additional third-party payment service providers for any reason, the transition or addition would require significant time and management resources, may not be as effective, efficient, or well-received by pet care providers and pet parents or adequately address regulatory requirements, and could adversely impact our bookings, GBV, revenue, cash flows and liquidity. Any of the foregoing risks related to third-party payment service providers, including with regard to compliance with money transmission rules in any jurisdiction in which we operate, could cause us to incur significant losses and, in certain cases, require us to make payments to pet care providers out of our funds, which could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
In addition, the software and services provided by our third-party payment service providers may fail to meet our expectations, contain errors or vulnerabilities, be compromised, and have and may continue to experience outages or delays. Any of these risks could cause, and have caused, us to lose our ability to accept online payments or other payment transactions or facilitate timely payments to pet care providers on our platform, which could make our platform less convenient and desirable to
customers and adversely affect our ability to attract and retain pet care providers and pet parents. Compromise of, or default by, a third party payment provider also could result in loss of funds by Rover or by pet care providers.
Increased fees charged by third-party payment service providers and their ability to hold our cash as a reserve or suspend processing activities could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
For certain payment methods, including credit and debit cards, we pay interchange and other fees and such fees result in significant costs. Payment card network costs have increased and may continue to increase in the future the interchange fees and assessments that they charge for each transaction that accesses their networks and may impose special fees or assessments on any such transaction. Our payment card processors have the right to pass any increases in interchange fees and assessments on to us. Credit card transactions result in higher fees to us than transactions made through debit cards. We also face a risk of increased transaction fees and other fines and penalties if we fail to comply with payment card industry security standards. Any material increase in interchange fees in the United States or other geographies, including as a result of changes in interchange fee limitations imposed by law in some geographies, or other network fees or assessments, or an increased use of credit cards could increase our operating costs and materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
Moreover, our agreements with payment service providers may allow these companies, under certain conditions, to hold an amount of our cash as a reserve. They may be entitled to a reserve or suspension of processing services upon the occurrence of specified events, including material adverse changes in our business, operating results and financial condition. An imposition of a reserve or suspension of processing services by one or more of our processing companies could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We rely on third parties to provide some of the software or features for our platform and depend on the interoperability of our platform across third-party applications and services. If these third parties were to interfere with the distribution of our platform or with our use of their software, our business would be materially adversely affected.
If the third parties we rely upon cease to provide access to the third-party software that we, pet parents and pet care providers use, do not provide access to the software on terms that we believe to be attractive or reasonable, or do not provide us with the most current version of the software, we may be required to seek comparable software from other sources, which may be more expensive or inferior, or may not be available at all, any of which would adversely affect our business. For example, we rely on Google Maps for maps and location data that are core to the functionality of our platform, and telecommunication service providers for voice calls and SMS, and we integrate applications, content and data from third parties to deliver our platform and services. Third-party applications, products and services are constantly evolving and we may not be able to maintain or modify our platform to ensure its compatibility with third-party offerings following development changes. If we lose such interoperability, experience difficulties or increased costs in integrating our offerings into alternative devices or systems, or manufacturers or operating systems elect not to include our offerings, make changes that degrade the functionality of our offerings, or give preferential treatment to competitive products, the growth of our community and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
We rely on mobile operating systems and application marketplaces to make our applications available and if they modify their policies, or if we do not effectively operate with or receive favorable placements within such application marketplaces and maintain high user reviews, the usage of our platform or brand recognition could decline and our business, financial results and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
We depend in part on mobile operating systems, such as Android and iOS and their respective application marketplaces, to make our applications available to pet parents and pet care providers that use our platform. Any changes in such systems and application marketplaces that degrade the functionality of our applications, give preferential treatment to our competitors’ applications or limit our ability to market to our customers could adversely affect our platform’s usage on mobile devices. If such mobile operating systems or application marketplaces limit or prohibit us from making our applications available to pet parents and pet care providers, make changes that degrade the functionality of our applications, increase the cost to users or to us of using such mobile operating systems or application marketplaces or our applications, impose terms of use unsatisfactory to us, or modify their search or ratings algorithms in ways that are detrimental to us, or if our competitors’ placement in such mobile operating systems’ application marketplace is more prominent than the placement of our applications, our user growth could slow, pause or decline. Our applications have experienced fluctuations in the past and we anticipate similar fluctuations in the future. In addition, these application marketplaces may modify their guidelines and policies at any time, which has imposed and could continue to impose a significant burden on us, prevented and may in the future prevent us from rolling out updates to our applications, or impair our ability to collect or store information we rely on for marketing, measurement,
analytics or other business purposes. Any of the foregoing risks could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
As new mobile devices and mobile platforms, as well as entirely new tech platforms, are developed and released, there is no guarantee that certain devices will continue to support our platform or effectively roll out updates to our applications. Additionally, in order to deliver high-quality applications, we need to ensure that our platform is designed to work effectively with a range of mobile technologies, systems, networks and standards. We may not be successful in developing or maintaining relationships with key participants in the mobile industry that enhance users’ experience. If pet parents or pet care providers that use our platform encounter any difficulty accessing or using our applications on their mobile devices or if we are unable to adapt to changes in popular mobile operating systems, we expect that our user growth and user engagement would be materially adversely affected.
Our platform contains third-party open source software components and failure to comply with the terms of the underlying open source software licenses could restrict our ability to provide our platform.
Our platform contains software modules licensed to us by third-party authors under “open source” licenses. Use and distribution of open source software may entail greater risks than use of third-party commercial software, as open source licensors generally do not provide support, warranties, indemnification, or other contractual protections regarding infringement claims or the quality of the code. In addition, the public availability of such software may make it easier for others to compromise our platform.
Some open source licenses contain requirements that may, depending on how the licensed software is used or modified, require that we make available source code for modifications or derivative works we create based upon the licensed open source software, authorize further modification and redistribution of that source code, make that source code available at little or no cost, or grant other licenses to our intellectual property. If we combine our proprietary software with open source software in a certain manner, such as by including source code generated by AI, we could, under certain open source licenses, be required to release the source code of our proprietary software under the terms of an open source software license. This could enable our competitors to create similar offerings with lower development effort and time and ultimately could result in a loss of our competitive advantages. Alternatively, to avoid the release of the affected portions of our source code, we could be required to purchase additional licenses, expend substantial time and resources to re-engineer some or all of our software or cease use or distribution of some or all of our software until we can adequately address the concerns.
We also release certain of our proprietary software modules to the public under open source licenses. Although we have certain policies and procedures in place to monitor our use of open source software that are designed to avoid subjecting our platform to conditions we do not intend, those policies and procedures may not be effective to detect or address all such conditions, particularly as we incorporate AI-assisted tools into our software development process. In addition, the terms of many open source licenses have not been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts and there is a risk that these licenses could be construed in a way that could impose unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to provide or distribute our platform. From time to time, there have been claims challenging the ownership of open source software against companies that incorporate open source software into their solutions. As a result, we could be subject to lawsuits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software.
If we are held to have breached or failed to fully comply with all the terms and conditions of an open source software license, we could face infringement or other liability, or be required to seek costly licenses from third parties to continue providing our platform on terms that are not economically feasible, to re-engineer our platform, to discontinue or delay the provision of our platform if re-engineering could not be accomplished on a timely basis, or to make generally available, in source code form, our proprietary code, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our use of AI tools trained on open source software may also increase our exposure to the foregoing risks.
We use and may continue to use artificial intelligence in our business, and challenges with properly managing its use could result in reputational harm, competitive harm, and legal liability, and adversely affect our results of operations.
We have incorporated AI solutions into our development practices and may in the future incorporate AI solutions into our platform, offerings, services, features, data analysis, and operations, and these integrations may become important to our business over time. For example, we currently use certain AI solutions to improve the productivity of our engineering efforts and our vendors may implement AI technology in their services to us. Our competitors or other third parties may incorporate AI into their products and operations more quickly or more successfully than us, which could impair our ability to compete
effectively and adversely affect our results. Additionally, if the content, analyses, or recommendations that AI applications assist in producing are or are alleged to be deficient, inaccurate, biased, or in violation of any third-party rights, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Others have experienced cybersecurity incidents from the use of AI applications that implicate the personal data of end users of such applications. Although we have not experienced any cybersecurity incidents resulting from the use of AI applications, we may experience such cybersecurity incidents in the future. Any cybersecurity incidents related to our use of AI applications could adversely affect our reputation and results of operations.
AI also presents emerging ethical issues and if our use of AI becomes controversial, we may experience brand or reputational harm, competitive harm, or legal liability. The rapid evolution of AI, including potential government regulation of AI, will require significant resources to develop, test and maintain our platform, offerings, services, and features to help us implement AI ethically in order to minimize unintended, harmful impact.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
Failure to adequately protect our intellectual property could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our business depends on our intellectual property, the protection of which is crucial to the success of our business. We rely on a combination of trademarks (including registered trademarks in the United States and foreign jurisdictions), copyrights, trade secrets, patents, license agreements, intellectual property assignment agreements and confidentiality procedures to protect our intellectual property. In addition, we attempt to protect our intellectual property, technology and confidential information by requiring our employees and consultants who develop intellectual property on our behalf to enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements and employee non-competition agreements, and third parties with whom we share information to enter into nondisclosure agreements. These agreements may not effectively prevent unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information, intellectual property, or technology and may not provide an adequate remedy in the case of unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information or technology, or infringement of our intellectual property. In addition, laws banning or limiting the enforcement of employee non-competition agreements may eliminate or curtail the protection afforded by such agreements. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties have and may continue to copy aspects of our platform or other software, technology and functionality or obtain and use information that we consider proprietary. In addition, unauthorized parties may also attempt, or successfully endeavor, to obtain our intellectual property, confidential information and trade secrets through various methods, including through scraping of public data or other content from our website or mobile applications, or via cybersecurity attacks, and legal or other methods of protecting this data may be inadequate.
Competitors have and may continue to adopt service names or trade dress similar to ours, thereby harming our ability to build brand identity and possibly leading to user confusion. In addition, there could be potential trade name or trademark infringement claims brought by owners of other trademarks that are similar to our trademarks. Litigation or proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or other governmental authorities and administrative bodies in the United States and abroad have been and may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights and to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Further, we may not timely or successfully register our trademarks or otherwise secure our intellectual property. Our efforts to protect, maintain, or enforce our proprietary rights may not be respected in the future or may be invalidated, circumvented, or challenged and could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Intellectual property infringement assertions by third parties could result in significant costs and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and reputation.
We operate in an industry with frequent intellectual property litigation. Other parties have asserted, and in the future may assert, that we have infringed their intellectual property rights. We could be required to pay substantial damages or cease using intellectual property or technology that is deemed infringing. Our use of AI tools in our business may increase the likelihood of such claims.
Further, we cannot predict whether other assertions of third-party intellectual property rights or claims arising from such assertions would substantially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. The defense of these claims and any future infringement claims, whether they are with or without merit or are determined in our favor, may result in costly litigation and diversion of technical and management personnel. Further, an adverse outcome of a dispute may require us
to pay damages, potentially including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if we are found to have willfully infringed a party’s patent or copyright rights, cease making, licensing, or using products that are alleged to incorporate the intellectual property of others, expend additional development resources to redesign our offerings and enter into potentially unfavorable royalty or license agreements in order to obtain the right to use necessary technologies. Royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may be unavailable on terms acceptable to us, or at all. In any event, we may need to license intellectual property which would require us to pay royalties or make one-time payments. Even if these matters do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor or without significant cash settlements, the time and resources necessary to resolve them could adversely affect our business, reputation, financial condition and operating results.
We may be unable to continue to use the domain names that we use in our business or prevent third parties from acquiring and using domain names that infringe on, are similar to, or otherwise decrease the value of our brand, trademarks, or service marks.
We have registered domain names that we use in, or are related to, our business, most importantly www.rover.com. If we lose the ability to use a domain name, whether due to trademark claims, failure to renew the applicable registration, or any other cause, we may be forced to market our offerings under a new domain name, which could cause us substantial harm, or to incur significant expense in order to purchase rights to the domain name in question. We may not be able to obtain preferred domain names outside the United States due to a variety of reasons, including because they are already held by others. In addition, our competitors and others could attempt to capitalize on our brand recognition by using domain names similar to our domain names. We may be unable to prevent third parties from acquiring and using domain names that infringe on, are similar to, or otherwise decrease the value of our brand or our trademarks or service marks. Protecting, maintaining and enforcing our rights in our domain names may require litigation, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources, which could in turn adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Risks Related to Our Operations
We depend on our highly skilled employees to grow and operate our business and if we are unable to hire, retain, manage and motivate our employees, or if our new employees do not perform as anticipated, we may not be able to grow effectively and our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
Our future success will depend in part on the continued service of our senior management team, key technical employees and other highly skilled employees, including Aaron Easterly, our co-founder and chief executive officer, Brent Turner, our chief operating officer and president, and Charlie Wickers, our chief financial officer, and on our ability to continue to identify, hire, develop, motivate and retain talented employees. Our U.S.-based employees, including our senior management team, work for us on an at-will basis and there is no assurance that any such employee will remain with us. Any changes in our senior management team or our failure to engage in effective succession planning may be disruptive to our business.
We face intense competition for highly skilled employees. For example, competition for engineering talent is particularly intense and engineering support is particularly important for our business. To attract and retain top talent, we have offered and believe we will need to continue to offer competitive compensation and benefits packages, including by keeping pace with substantial market increases and inflation. Our competitors may be successful in recruiting and hiring members of our management team or other key employees and it may be difficult for us to find suitable replacements on a timely basis, on competitive terms, or at all. If we are unable to attract and retain the necessary employees, particularly in critical areas of our business, we may not achieve our strategic goals.
Job candidates and existing employees often consider the value of the equity awards they receive in connection with their employment. If the perceived or actual value of our equity awards declines further, it may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees. On the other hand, our employees may receive significant proceeds from sales of our equity which may reduce their motivation to continue to work for us. We have invested and may need to continue to invest significant amounts of cash and equity to attract and retain new employees and have expended and may continue to expend significant time and resources to identify, recruit, train and integrate such employees. We may never realize returns on these investments. If we are unable to effectively manage our hiring needs or successfully integrate new hires, our efficiency, ability to meet forecasts and employee morale, productivity and engagement could suffer, which could adversely affect business, financial conditions and operating results.
Our company culture has contributed to our success and if we cannot maintain and evolve our culture as we grow, our business could be materially adversely affected.
We believe that our company culture has been critical to our success. We face many challenges that may affect our ability to sustain our corporate culture, including:
•failure to identify, attract, reward and retain people in leadership positions in our organization who share and further our culture, values and mission;
•the growth in size and geographic diversity of our workforce;
•competitive pressures to move in directions that may divert us from our mission, vision and values;
•the impact on employee morale resulting from our remote work policy;
•the impact on employee morale created by geopolitical and macroeconomic events, public stock market volatility, and general public company criticism;
•the continued challenges of a rapidly evolving industry;
•the increasing need to develop expertise in new areas of business that affect us;
•negative perception of our treatment of employees, pet parents, pet care providers, or our response to employee sentiment related to political or social causes or actions of management; and
•the integration of new personnel and businesses from acquisitions.
If we are not able to maintain and evolve our culture, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
Our support function is critical to the success of our platform and any failure, or perceived failure, to provide high-quality service and support could materially adversely affect our ability to retain our existing pet care providers and pet parents and attract new ones.
Meeting the support expectations of pet care providers and pet parents requires significant time and resources from our support team and significant investment in staffing, technology (including automation and machine learning to improve efficiency), infrastructure, policies and support tools. Failure to develop the appropriate technology, infrastructure, policies and support tools, to hire new operations personnel in a manner that keeps pace with our continued growth, or to manage or properly train our support team, could compromise our ability to resolve questions and complaints quickly and effectively. As part of our 2020 workforce reduction, we significantly reduced the number of employees in our support organization and our technology organization, and since the beginning of 2021 it has been necessary to rapidly increase such personnel, which impacts, or could in the future impact, our ability to provide effective support.
Our service is staffed based on complex algorithms that map to our business forecasts. Any volatility or errors in judgment in those forecasts could lead to staffing gaps that could impact the quality of our service. We have in the past experienced and may in the future experience backlog incidents that lead to substantial delays or other issues in responding to requests for customer support, which may reduce our ability to effectively retain pet care providers and pet parents.
The majority of our product-related customer contact volume typically is serviced by a single third-party service provider. We rely on our internal team and this third party to provide timely and appropriate responses to the inquiries of pet care providers and pet parents that come to us via telephone, email, social media and messaging. Reliance on this third party requires that we provide proper guidance and training for our and their employees, maintain proper controls and procedures for interacting with our community, and ensure acceptable levels of quality and customer satisfaction are achieved. Failure to appropriately allocate functions to this third-party service provider or to maintain suitable training, controls and procedures could materially adversely impact our business. During the first quarter of 2023, we began the process of transitioning from two third-party service providers to a sole third-party service provider for customer support, and this transition was completed during the second quarter of 2023. If this sole third-party service provider fails to provide suitable service in line with our expectations, terminates their relationship with us or refuses to renew their agreement with us on commercially reasonable terms, we may need to find alternate third-party service providers and may not be able to secure similar terms or experience or replace such provider or provide proper guidance and training in an acceptable timeframe, which could adversely impact our ability to timely and appropriately support pet care providers and pet parents.
We provide support and help to mediate disputes between pet care providers and pet parents. We rely on information provided by pet care providers and pet parents and are at times limited in our ability to provide adequate support or help resolve disputes due to our lack of information or control. To the extent that our users are not satisfied with the quality or timeliness of our support or third-party support, we may not be able to retain pet care providers or pet parents and our reputation as well our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
When a pet care provider or pet parent has a poor experience on our platform, we may issue refunds or coupons for future bookings, or other customer service gestures of monetary value. These refunds and coupons are generally treated as a reduction to revenue, and we may make payouts for property damage and personal and animal injury claims under the Rover Guarantee. A robust support effort is costly and we expect such costs to continue to rise in the future as we grow our business and implement new product offerings. We have historically seen a significant number of support inquiries from pet care providers and pet parents. Our efforts to reduce the number of support requests as we scale the business may not be effective and we could incur increased costs without corresponding revenue, which would materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
We rely on a third-party background check provider and a third-party identification provider to screen potential pet care providers and if such providers fail to provide accurate information or we do not maintain business relationships with them, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
In the United States and Canada, we rely on a single third-party background check provider to provide or confirm the criminal and other records of potential pet care providers to help identify those that are not eligible to use our platform pursuant to our internal standards and applicable law, and in the United Kingdom and Western Europe we rely on a single identity verification provider. Our business may be materially adversely affected to the extent such providers do not meet their contractual obligations, our expectations, or the requirements of applicable laws or regulations. If either of our third-party background check provider or our identity verification provider terminates its relationship with us or refuses to renew its agreement with us on commercially reasonable terms, we may need to find an alternate provider and may not be able to secure similar terms or replace such partners in an acceptable timeframe. If we cannot find alternate providers on terms acceptable to us, we may not be able to timely onboard potential pet care providers and as a result, we may have difficulty finding enough pet care providers to meet pet parent demand.
We rely primarily on third-party insurance policies to insure our operations-related risks. If our insurance coverage is insufficient for the needs of our business or our insurance providers are unable to meet their obligations, we may not be able to mitigate the risks facing our business, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We procure third-party insurance policies to cover various operations-related risks, including general liability, auto liability, excess and umbrella liability, employment practices liability, workers’ compensation, property, cybersecurity and data breaches, crime and fiduciary liability, and directors’ and officers’ liability. For certain risks, including certain business interruption losses, such as those resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic or future risks related to our new and evolving services, we may not be able to, or may choose not to, acquire insurance, or such insurance may not cover all claims. For example, claims arising from misclassification of contractors are excluded from our employer’s liability policy. In addition, we may have to pay high premiums, self-insured retentions, or deductibles for the coverage we do obtain. Additionally, if any of our insurance providers becomes insolvent, such provider would be unable to pay any operations-related claims that we make. Further, some of our agreements with vendors require that we procure certain types of insurance and if we are unable to obtain and maintain such insurance, we would be in violation of the terms of these vendor agreements.
Insurance providers have raised premiums and deductibles for many businesses and may do so again in the future. As a result, our insurance and claims expense could increase, or we may decide to raise our deductibles or self-insured retentions when our policies are renewed or replaced. Our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected if the cost per claim, premiums, or the number of claims significantly exceeds our historical experience or coverage limits, we experience a claim in excess of our coverage limits, our insurance providers fail to pay on our insurance claims, we experience a claim for which coverage is not provided, or the number of claims under our deductibles or self-insured retentions differs from historical averages.
While the Rover Guarantee is a commercial agreement with pet parents and pet care providers for which we are responsible, we rely on our general liability insurance policy to provide coverage to us for claims and losses subject to the Rover Guarantee that exceed our self-insured retention. Increased claim frequency and severity and increased fraudulent claims could result in
greater payouts, premium increases, or difficulty securing coverage. Further, disputes with pet care providers as to whether the Rover Guarantee applies to alleged losses or damages and the increased submission of fraudulent payment requests could require significant time and financial resources.
We may face difficulties as we expand our operations into new local markets in which we have limited or no prior operating experience.
Our capacity for continued growth depends in part on our ability to expand our operations into and compete effectively in new local markets, including in geographies outside of the United States. It may be difficult for us to accurately predict pet parent preferences and purchasing habits in new local markets. In addition, each market has unique regulatory dynamics. These include laws and regulations that can directly or indirectly affect our ability to operate, the pool of pet care providers that are available and our costs associated with insurance, support, fraud and onboarding new pet care providers. Each market also is subject to distinct competitive and operational dynamics. These include our ability to provide more attractive offerings than alternative options, to provide effective customer support and to efficiently attract and retain pet parents and pet care providers, all of which affect our sales, operating results and key business metrics. We may experience fluctuations in our operating results due to changing dynamics in the local markets in which we operate. If we invest substantial time and resources to expand our operations and are unable to manage these risks effectively, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
Our headquarters and other essential business operations could face catastrophic events, including those from natural or climate change-related disasters, that may disrupt our operations and harm our business.
Our headquarters and certain other essential customer support operations are located in Washington state, which is a seismically active region. We maintain additional customer support operations in Texas, which is a state subject to hurricanes and tropical storms. Certain pet parents, pet care providers, remote employees and third-party customer service support personnel live in areas where the risk of natural or climate-related disaster or other catastrophic losses exists, and the occasional incidence of such an event could cause substantial damage to us, pet parents, pet care providers, employees, third-party customer service support personnel or the surrounding area. The occurrence of a natural or climate-related disaster such as an earthquake, drought, flood, fire (such as wildfires in Washington and in the western United States and Canada), hurricane, heat wave, tropical storm, localized extended outages of critical utilities or transportation systems, or any critical resource shortages could negatively impact bookings on our platform, adversely impact our ability to provide timely customer service, and cause a significant interruption in our business, damage or destroy our facilities or those of service providers on which we rely, and cause us to incur significant costs, any of which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. The insurance policies we maintain may not cover such losses or may not be adequate to cover losses in any particular case.
Our presence outside the United States and any future international expansion strategy will subject us to additional costs and risks and our plans may not be successful.
We opened our platform in Canada in 2017 and in the United Kingdom and Western Europe in 2018, and we may continue to expand our international operations. We are a growing platform with pet care providers in over 30,000 neighborhoods globally as of September 30, 2023. Operating outside of the United States requires significant management attention to oversee operations over a broad geographic area with varying cultural norms and customs, in addition to placing strain on our finance, analytics, compliance, legal, engineering and operations teams. We may incur significant operating expenses and may not be successful in any international expansion efforts for a variety of reasons, including:
•recruiting and retaining talented and capable employees in foreign countries and maintaining our company culture across all of our offices;
•an inability to attract pet care providers and pet parents;
•an inability to effectively scale Rover brand awareness outside the United States;
•competition from local providers that better understand the local market, may market and operate more effectively and may enjoy greater local affinity or awareness;
•differing demand dynamics, which may make our platform less successful;
•an inability to successfully tailor our product offerings to different cultural customs and norms;
•an inability of our international markets to scale and mature in the same way or on the same time horizon as the U.S. market;
•complying with varying laws and regulatory standards, including with respect to labor and employment, data privacy, data protection, and information security, tax and local regulatory restrictions;
•obtaining any required government approvals, licenses, or other authorizations;
•varying levels of Internet and mobile technology adoption and infrastructure;
•currency exchange restrictions or costs and exchange rate fluctuations;
•operating in jurisdictions that do not protect intellectual property rights in the same manner or to the same extent as the United States;
•public health concerns or emergencies, such as COVID-19 and other highly communicable diseases or viruses, outbreaks of which have from time to time occurred and which may occur, in various parts of the world in which we operate or may operate in the future; and
•limitations on the repatriation and investment of funds as well as foreign currency exchange restrictions.
Our limited experience in operating our business internationally increases the risk that any potential future expansion efforts that we may undertake may not be successful. If we invest substantial time and resources to further expand our operations internationally and are unable to manage these risks effectively, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
International expansion also may increase our risks in complying with various laws and standards, including with respect to anti-corruption, anti-bribery, export controls and trade and economic sanctions.
Failure to successfully execute and integrate acquisitions or receive a favorable return on acquisitions or strategic investments could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
As part of our business strategy, we will continue to consider a wide array of potential strategic transactions, including acquisitions of businesses, new technologies, services and other assets and strategic investments that complement our business. For example, in 2022 we consummated a small acquisition of GoodPup, an early-stage company that operates a virtual dog training platform, and made a small investment in another early-stage company with a complementary service offering. We have previously acquired and continue to evaluate targets that operate in relatively nascent markets and as a result, there is no assurance that such acquired businesses will be successfully integrated into our business or such acquired businesses or investments will generate substantial revenue or a favorable return on investment. Acquisitions and strategic investments involve numerous risks, any of which could harm our business and negatively affect our financial condition and operating results, including:
•intense competition for suitable acquisition targets, which could increase prices and adversely affect our ability to consummate deals on favorable or acceptable terms;
•failure or material delay in closing a transaction;
•transaction-related lawsuits or claims;
•difficulties in integrating the technologies, operations, existing contracts and personnel of an acquired company, including managing internal controls and any privacy or data security risks associated with such acquisitions;
•difficulties in retaining key employees or business partners of an acquired company;
•difficulties in retaining merchants, consumers and service providers, as applicable, of an acquired company;
•challenges with integrating the brand identity of an acquired company with our own;
•diversion of financial and management time and resources from existing operations or alternative acquisition or investment opportunities to acquisition integration;
•failure to realize the anticipated benefits or synergies of a transaction;
•failure to identify the problems, liabilities, or other shortcomings or challenges of an acquired company or technology, including issues related to intellectual property, regulatory and tax compliance practices, litigation, revenue recognition or other accounting practices, or employee or user issues;
•risks that regulatory bodies may enact new laws or promulgate new regulations that are adverse to an acquired company or business;
•risks that regulatory bodies do not approve our acquisitions or business combinations or delay such approvals;
•theft of our trade secrets or confidential information that we share with potential acquisition candidates;
•liability for pre-acquisition activities of an acquired company;
•litigation or other claims or liabilities arising in connection with the acquisition of the acquired company;
•impairment charges associated with goodwill, long-lived assets, investments, and other acquired intangible assets;
•risk that an acquired company or investment in new services cannibalizes a portion of our existing business;
•failure to receive a favorable return on investment for prior or future business combinations or investments; and
•adverse market reaction to an acquisition or investment.
For example, in 2020 we recognized a $2.1 million impairment related to the write-down of our investment in DogHero, a pet care marketplace based in Brazil. During the three months ended June 30, 2023, we recorded non-cash impairment charges of $3.8 million to write off goodwill in full for the GoodPup reporting unit and $3.2 million related to acquired tradenames, shelter relationships, training curriculum and developed technology from the GoodPup asset group. See Part I, Item 1, Note 8—Goodwill and Intangible Assets for more information. Impairment may result from, among other things, deterioration in performance, adverse market conditions such as the challenging fundraising environment currently facing early stage companies like our equity investment in an early-stage company that provides a service for pet parents that is complementary to our current offerings, adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations, challenges applying our technological, marketing, and operational expertise to help scale acquisitions or investments in a profitable, efficient, and effective manner, and a variety of other factors. The amount of any quantified impairment must be expensed immediately as a charge to results of operations. If we are required to record additional non-cash impairment charges to our goodwill, other intangibles, and/or long-lived assets or write down the carrying value related to past or future acquisitions or investments, such a non-cash charge or write down in carrying value could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated statements of operations in the reporting period in which we record the charge.
If we fail to address the foregoing risks or other problems encountered in connection with past or future acquisitions of businesses, new technologies, services and other assets and strategic investments, or if we fail to successfully integrate such acquisitions or investments, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
We may require additional capital to support business growth and this capital might not be available on acceptable terms, or at all.
To support our growing business and to effectively compete, we must have sufficient capital to continue to make significant investments in our platform. We intend to continue to make investments to support our business growth and may require additional funds to respond to business challenges, including the need to develop new platform features and services or enhance our existing platform, improve our operating infrastructure, or acquire complementary businesses and technologies. Although we currently anticipate that our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs for at least the next 12 months, we may require additional financing over the long-term. Accordingly, we may need to engage in equity or debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise additional funds through future issuances of equity, equity-linked securities, or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution and any new securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of current equity investors. If we raise additional funds through the incurrence of indebtedness, then we may be subject to increased fixed payment obligations and could be subject to restrictive covenants, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt and other operating restrictions that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. Any additional future indebtedness we may incur may result in terms that could be unfavorable to our equity investors.
We evaluate financing opportunities from time to time and our ability to obtain financing will depend, among other things, on our development efforts, business plans and operating performance and the condition of the capital markets at the time we seek financing. Volatility in the equity capital markets, bank failures or issues in the broader U.S. financial system, or a decline in the market price of our securities also could adversely affect our ability to issue additional equity securities or to obtain additional financing in the future to fund business operations or future growth plans. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be impaired and our business, financial condition and operating results may be materially adversely affected.
Our applications for the Paycheck Protection Program Loan and the employee retention credit under the CARES Act could in the future be determined to have been impermissible or could result in damage to our reputation.
In April 2020, we entered into a certain Paycheck Protection Program, or PPP, Promissory Note and Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank, pursuant to which we received loan proceeds of $8.1 million, or the PPP Loan. The PPP Loan was subject to the terms and conditions of the PPP, which was established under the CARES Act and is administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration, or the SBA. The PPP loan application required us to certify, among other things, that the “current economic uncertainty” made the PPP Loan request “necessary” to support our ongoing operations. We made this certification in good faith after analyzing, among other things, the maintenance of our workforce, our need for additional funding to continue operations, the severe impact of COVID-19 on our revenue, financial covenants associated with then-existing loans and our ability to access alternative forms of capital in the then-current market environment to offset the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Following this analysis, we believe that we satisfied all eligibility criteria for the PPP Loans and that our receipt of the PPP Loans was consistent with the broad objectives of the CARES Act. The certification described above did not contain any objective criteria and is subject to interpretation.
In accordance with the requirements of the PPP, we used the PPP Loan to cover certain qualified expenses, including payroll costs, rent and utility costs. We repaid the principal and accrued interest on the PPP Loan in connection with the closing of the Merger on July 30, 2021.
The lack of clarity regarding loan eligibility under the PPP has resulted in significant media coverage and controversy with respect to companies that applied for and received loans. If, despite our good-faith belief that given our circumstances we satisfied all eligible requirements for the PPP Loan, we are later determined to have violated any applicable laws or regulations that may apply to us in connection with the PPP Loan or it is otherwise determined that we were ineligible to receive the PPP Loan, we may be subject to penalties, which could also result in adverse publicity and damage to our reputation. While the SBA reviewed our PPP Loan in January 2022 and requested documentation without incident, the SBA could still conduct further reviews and request additional documentation.
As discussed in Note 7—Balance Sheet Components, in the second quarter of 2022, we filed an application with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, for an employee retention credit of $3.3 million. We recorded other income of $1.9 million related to the partial realization of the credit in the second quarter of 2023. In September 2023, the IRS announced an immediate moratorium on processing new employee retention credit claims amid a surge of questionable claims and that previously filed claims would be subject to enhanced compliance scrutiny. Our eligibility remains subject to audit by the IRS for a period of five years.
While we believe we can demonstrate that we satisfied all relevant eligibility criteria for the PPP Loan and employee retention credit and used all proceeds of the PPP Loan for permissible expenses, there is no guarantee that the SBA or IRS will agree, and any adverse findings or prolonged audit proceedings could, in addition to fines or penalties, result in the diversion of management’s time and attention and legal and reputational costs. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Financial Reporting and Disclosure
Because we recognize revenue upon the start of a booked service and not at booking, upticks or downturns in bookings are not immediately reflected in our operating results.
We experience a difference in timing between when a booking is made and when we recognize revenue, which occurs when the service is provided. The effect of significant downturns in bookings or increases in cancellations for upcoming booking
dates in a particular quarter may not be fully reflected in our operating results until future periods because of this timing in revenue recognition, but would reduce our deferred revenue for the relevant period.
We track certain operational metrics with internal systems and tools and do not independently verify such metrics. Certain of our operational metrics are subject to inherent challenges in measurement and any real or perceived inaccuracies in such metrics may adversely affect our business and reputation.
We track certain operational metrics, including our key business metrics such as the number of bookings, GBV, and pet parent cohort behavior, with internal systems and tools that are not independently verified by any third party and which may differ from estimates or similar metrics published by third parties due to differences in sources, methodologies, or the assumptions on which we rely. Our internal systems and tools have a number of limitations and our methodologies for tracking these metrics may change over time, which could result in unexpected changes to our metrics, including the metrics we publicly disclose. If the internal systems and tools we use to track these metrics under count or over count performance or contain algorithmic or other technical errors, the data we report may not be accurate.
While these numbers are based on what we believe to be reasonable estimates of our metrics for the applicable period of measurement, there are inherent challenges in measuring how our platform is used across large populations. For example, the accuracy of our operating metrics could be impacted by fraudulent users of our platform, and further, we believe that there are consumers who have multiple accounts, even though this is prohibited in our Terms of Service and we implement measures to detect and prevent this behavior. In addition, limitations or errors with respect to how we measure data or with respect to the data that we measure may affect our understanding of certain details of our business, which could affect our long-term strategies. If our operating metrics are not accurate representations of our business, if investors do not perceive our operating metrics to be accurate, or if we discover material inaccuracies with respect to these figures, we expect that our business, reputation, financial condition and operating results would be materially adversely affected.
Our management has limited experience in operating a public company.
Our executive officers and directors have limited experience in the management of a publicly traded company. Our management team may not successfully or effectively manage being a public company, and we are subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under federal securities laws. Our executive officers’ limited experience in dealing with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies could be a significant disadvantage in that it is likely that an increasing amount of their time may be devoted to these activities which will result in less time being devoted to our management and growth. We have hired, and it is likely we will hire in the future, additional employees to support our operations as a public company, which will increase our operating costs in future periods.
Activist stockholders may attempt to effect changes at our company, acquire control over our company or seek a sale of our company, which could impact the pursuit of business strategies and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Our stockholders may from time to time engage in proxy solicitations, advance stockholder proposals or otherwise attempt to affect changes or acquire control over our company. Campaigns by stockholders to effect changes at public companies are sometimes led by investors seeking to increase short-term stockholder value through actions such as financial restructuring, increased debt, special dividends, stock repurchases or sales of the entire company. For example, in 2022 an activist investor acquired a stake in a company that, like us, went public via a merger with a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC, and recommended that it consider strategic alternatives, including a sale, citing, among other reasons, its recent stock price underperformance and the market’s largely unfavorable view of companies taken public via a SPAC. We could face a similar campaign if the unfavorable view of SPACs continues or if our stock price does not improve. Responding to proxy contests, which may increase as a result of the SEC’s universal proxy rules, and other actions by activist stockholders can lead to changes in governance and reporting, be extremely costly and time-consuming, divert the attention of our board of directors, or the Board, and senior management from the management of our operations and the pursuit of our business strategies, and impact the manner in which we operate our business in ways in which we cannot currently anticipate. As a result, stockholder campaigns could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and may identify additional material weaknesses in the future or fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, which may result in material misstatements of our consolidated financial statements or cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations.
We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as described below. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We did not design or maintain an effective control environment due to an insufficient complement of personnel with the appropriate level of knowledge, experience, and training commensurate with our accounting and reporting requirements. This material weakness contributed to the following additional material weaknesses:
•We did not design and maintain sufficient formal procedures and controls to achieve complete and accurate financial reporting and disclosures, including controls over the preparation and review of journal entries and account reconciliations. Additionally, we did not design and maintain controls to ensure appropriate segregation of duties.
•We did not design and maintain effective controls related to the identification of and accounting for certain non-routine, unusual or complex transactions, including the proper application of U.S. GAAP of such transactions. Specifically, we did not design and maintain controls to timely identify and account for warrant instruments that are derivative financial instruments.
The material weakness related to accounting for warrant instruments resulted in the restatement of the previously issued financial statements of Nebula Caravel Acquisition Corp. our legal predecessor, or Caravel, related to warrant liabilities, change in fair value of warrant liabilities, additional paid-in capital, accumulated deficit and related financial statement disclosures. The other material weaknesses described above did not result in a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements; however they did result in adjustments to several accounts and disclosures prior to the original issuance of the financial statements. Additionally, these material weaknesses could result in a misstatement of substantially all of the financial statement accounts and disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.
•We identified an additional material weakness as a result of the material weakness in our control environment in that we did not design and maintain effective controls over information technology (“IT”) general controls for information systems that are relevant to the preparation of our financial statements. Specifically, we did not design and maintain: (1) program change management controls for financial systems to ensure that information technology program and data changes affecting financial IT applications and underlying accounting records are identified, tested, authorized and implemented appropriately; (2) user access controls to ensure appropriate segregation of duties that adequately restrict user and privileged access to financial applications, programs, and data to appropriate Company personnel; (3) computer operations controls to ensure that critical batch jobs are monitored and data backups are authorized and monitored; and (4) testing and approval controls for program development to ensure that new software development is aligned with business and IT requirements.
These IT deficiencies did not result in a material misstatement to the financial statements; however, the deficiencies, when aggregated, could impact our ability to maintain effective segregation of duties, as well as the effectiveness of IT-dependent controls (such as automated controls that address the risk of material misstatement to one or more assertions, along with the IT controls and underlying data that support the effectiveness of system-generated data and reports) that could result in misstatements potentially impacting all financial statement accounts and disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, we have determined these deficiencies in the aggregate constitute a material weakness.
We have begun implementation of a plan to remediate these material weaknesses. These remediation measures are ongoing and include hiring additional personnel, implementing additional procedures and controls, and engaging an external advisor. See Part I, Item 4 “Controls and Procedures—Remediation Efforts to Address Previously Identified Material Weaknesses” of this report for a discussion of these remediation measures. We can give no assurance that the measures we have taken and plan to take in the future will remediate the material weaknesses identified or that any additional material weaknesses or restatements of financial results will not arise in the future due to a failure to implement and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting or circumvention of these controls.
Likewise, if our financial statements are not filed on a timely basis, we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the Nasdaq stock exchange, the SEC, or other regulatory authorities. Failure to timely file will cause us to be ineligible to utilize short-form registration statements on Form S-3, which may impair our ability to obtain capital in a timely fashion to execute our business strategies and issue shares to effect a business combination. In either case, there could be a material adverse effect on our business. The existence of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting could adversely affect our reputation or investor perceptions of us, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our Class A Common Stock. In addition, we will incur additional costs to remediate material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.
Our management’s first annual assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting was included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. We are now required to disclose material changes made in our internal control over financial reporting on a quarterly basis. Our independent registered public accounting firm will first be required to audit the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the first year we are no longer an “emerging growth company” or eligible for other relief. Failure to comply with the rules and regulations of the SEC could potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC, the Nasdaq stock exchange or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources.
We may face litigation and other risks as a result of the material weakness in the internal control over financial reporting of Caravel.
Following the issuance of the SEC’s “Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies,” after consultation with Caravel’s independent registered public accounting firm, Caravel’s management and audit committee concluded that it was appropriate to restate its previously issued audited financial statements as of December 31, 2020. As part of the restatement, Caravel identified a material weakness in its internal controls over financial reporting.
As a result of such material weakness, the restatement, the change in accounting for the warrants, and other matters raised or that may in the future be raised by the SEC, we may face potential litigation or other disputes which may include, among others, claims invoking the federal and state securities laws, contractual claims or other claims arising from the restatement and material weaknesses in Caravel’s and Legacy Rover’s internal control over financial reporting and the preparation of Caravel’s and Legacy Rover’s financial statements. We can provide no assurance that such litigation or dispute will not arise in the future. Any such litigation or dispute, whether successful or not, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to Ownership of Class A Common Stock
The market price of our Class A Common Stock has been, and may continue to be, volatile and may decline.
The trading price of our Class A Common Stock has been and may continue to be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to the risk factors described in this report and other factors beyond our control as listed below. Any of such factors could have a material adverse effect on an investment in our Class A Common Stock, and our Class A Common Stock may trade at prices significantly below the price an investor paid for them. In such circumstances, the trading price of our Class A Common Stock may not recover and may experience a further decline. For example, between August 2, 2021 and November 3, 2023, our Class A Common Stock’s trading price on Nasdaq has ranged from a low of $3.14 to a high of $15.59. Some companies that have experienced volatility in the trading price of their stock have been the subject of securities litigation.
Factors affecting the trading price of our Class A Common Stock may include:
•general macroeconomic conditions, including sustained levels of increased inflation, rising interest rates, lower consumer confidence, depressed consumer spending, higher levels of consumer debt, lower pet adoption levels, the number of pet owning households, a reduction in the volume of home sales and its impact on relocating households, volatile equity capital markets, changes in monetary and fiscal policy, any U.S. government shutdown, and economic uncertainty, slower economic growth and recessions, and geopolitical events such as the current armed conflicts between Ukraine and Russia and between Israel and Hamas and their impact on fuel and commodity costs and travel demand;
•actual or anticipated changes or fluctuations in our quarterly or annual operating and financial results or any financial projections and guidance we may provide to the public, changes in the market’s expectations about our operating and
financial results, or failure to meet or exceed our financial projections and guidance or the expectation of securities analysts or investors in a particular period;
•actual or anticipated fluctuations in annual or quarterly operating and financial performance, stock market trading volumes and trading prices of other technology or growth companies generally, or those in the pet care industry or otherwise perceived to be similar to us in particular;
•the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and other non-COVID illnesses on our business;
•any unfavorable view by the market of companies taken public via a SPAC;
•announcements by us or our competitors of new technology, features, services or strategic partnerships or other agreements;
•our competitors’ performance;
•developments or disputes concerning our intellectual property or other proprietary rights;
•actual or perceived data security breaches or other data security incidents;
•announced or completed acquisitions of businesses by us or our competitors or rumors of such transactions involving us or our competitors;
•stock repurchase programs undertaken by us, including the one we announced in February 2023 and extended in November 2023;
•any major change in our board of directors or management;
•changes in laws and regulations affecting our business, actual or anticipated developments in our business, our competitors’ businesses or the competitive landscape generally and any related market speculation;
•litigation and any related adverse outcomes or settlements involving us, our industry or both;
•governmental or regulatory actions or audits;
•regulatory or legal developments in the United States and other countries;
•stockholder activism;
•announcement or expectation of additional financing efforts;
•changes in accounting standards, policies, guidelines, interpretations or principles;
•our ability to meet compliance requirements;
•concentrated ownership by management or significant stockholders;
•the public’s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements, and filings with the SEC;
•operating and share price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to us;
•price and trading volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;
•failure of securities analysts to maintain coverage of us, or changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts concerning us or the pet care industry in general;
•changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of securities, including the last tranche of 2,192,687 shares of Class A Common Stock that may be issued to former Legacy Rover stockholders upon the Class A Common Stock achieving certain share price milestones pursuant to our Business Combination Agreement with Caravel, or Earnout Shares, or the incurrence of debt;
•trading volume fluctuations in our shares of Class A Common Stock from time to time and the volume of shares of Class A Common Stock available for public sale or being sold, including:
◦shares sold pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans that have been adopted by our executive officers and certain employees and Rule 10b5-1 plans that may be adopted in the future by our executive officers, employees or directors,
◦shares sold to satisfy tax withholding obligations and the aggregate exercise price for the exercise of stock options,
◦any shares sold if we reimplement a “sell-to-cover” program to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of our employees’ RSUs;
•sales or other distributions of shares of Class A Common Stock by us;
•sales or other distributions of substantial amounts of shares of Class A Common Stock by our directors, executive officers or significant stockholders or the perception that such sales or other distributions could occur such as the publicly announced pro rata in-kind distribution in June 2023 by one of our five percent or greater stockholders of approximately 4.3 million shares;
•entry into or exit from stock market indices; and
Broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our securities irrespective of our operating performance. The stock markets in general have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the particular companies affected. The trading prices and valuations of these stocks and of our securities may not be predictable. A loss of investor confidence in the market for retail, technology or growth stocks or the stocks of other companies which investors perceive to be similar to us has and could further depress our share price regardless of our business, prospects, financial conditions or results of operations. Volatility in the equity capital markets or a decline in the market price of our securities also could adversely affect our ability to issue additional equity securities, our ability to obtain additional financing in the future to fund business operations or future growth plans, and the retentive power of our equity compensation plans, which we rely upon in part to retain key executives and employees.
Further and sustained declines in the market price of our Class A Common Stock could result in notice that we are not in compliance with the per share minimum price requirements for continued listing on Nasdaq. If this occurred and we were unable to cure this violation, we could be delisted, which would have a further material adverse effect on market prices of our Class A Common Stock and stockholder liquidity.
Insiders currently have and may continue to possess substantial influence over us, which could limit investors’ ability to affect the outcome of key transactions, including a change of control.
As of November 3, 2023, our executive officers, directors and their affiliates as a group beneficially owned approximately 35% of the Class A Common Stock representing approximately 33% of the vote (the calculation of such amounts excludes the last tranche of 2,192,687 earnout shares, unvested RSUs and options to purchase Class A Common Stock that remain issued and outstanding, and equity awards that may be issued in the future under our employee benefit plans, including the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2021 Plan, and the 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the 2021 ESPP).
As a result, these stockholders, if they act together, may be able to influence our management and affairs and all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, and approval of significant corporate transactions. They may also have interests that differ from other stockholders and may vote in a way with which other stockholders disagree and which may be adverse to their interests. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change in control and might affect the market price of our Class A Common Stock.
In addition, Nebula Caravel Holdings, LLC holds the right to designate a director to our Board. This control could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management and could make the approval of certain transactions difficult or impossible without the support of insider stockholders and their votes.
Because there are no current plans to pay cash dividends on our Class A Common Stock for the foreseeable future, investors may not receive any return on investment unless they sell their Class A Common Stock at a price greater than what they paid for it.
We intend to retain future earnings, if any, for future operations and expansion, our publicly announced stock repurchase program, to pay taxes related to employee RSU vesting, and any future debt repayment. There are no current plans to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. The declaration, amount and payment of any future dividends on shares of our Class A Common Stock will be at the sole discretion of the Board. The Board may take into account general and economic conditions, our financial condition and results of operations, our available cash and current and anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, contractual, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions, implications of the payment of dividends to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to us and such other factors as the Board may deem relevant. As a result, investors may not receive any return on an investment in our Class A Common Stock unless they sell their Class A Common Stock for a price greater than that which they paid for it.
Our stockholders may experience significant dilution in the future.
The percentage of shares of our Class A Common Stock owned by current stockholders will be diluted in the future because of equity issuances for acquisitions, capital market transactions or otherwise, including, without limitation, equity awards granted to our directors, officers and employees or meeting the conditions under the last tranche of 2,192,687 Earnout Shares. These issuances may have a significant dilutive effect on our earnings per share, which could adversely affect the market price of our Class A Common Stock. For example, because the volume weighted average price of our Class A Common Stock over the 20 trading days preceding and inclusive of September 29, 2021 exceeded $12.00 and $14.00, the first two tranches of Earnout Shares were triggered, and we issued an aggregate of 17,540,964 Earnout Shares to eligible former Legacy Rover stockholders in October 2021. Further, in connection with the redemption of all of our outstanding warrants, we issued 2,046,220 shares of Class A Common Stock in January 2022 related to the cashless exercise of certain of those warrants during December 2021 and January 2022.
We currently enable “sell-to-cover” transactions to satisfy tax withholding obligations and the aggregate exercise price for the exercise of stock options. We have previously utilized, and may utilize again in the future, “sell-to-cover” transactions to satisfy tax withholding obligations for the vesting of RSUs. Under “sell-to-cover,” shares with a market value equivalent to the tax withholding obligation and aggregate exercise price will be sold on behalf of the individual exercising vested options to cover the tax withholding liability and aggregate exercise price, and the cash proceeds related to tax withholding obligations from these sales will be remitted by us to the taxing authorities. These sales will not result in the expenditure of additional cash by us to satisfy the tax withholding obligations for options, but will cause dilution to our stockholders and, to the extent a large number of shares are sold in connection with any exercise event, such sales volume may cause our stock price to fluctuate.
We cannot guarantee that our share repurchase program will be utilized to the full value approved or that it will enhance long-term stockholder value.
In February 2023, our Board approved a 12-month share repurchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $50.0 million of Class A Common Stock (exclusive of brokers’ commissions and expenses). The repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares of Class A Common Stock. In November 2023, our board of directors approved an extension of the share repurchase program to run through February 28, 2025 and an increase to the total authorized amount under the program of up to $100.0 million resulting in a total authorized amount of up to $150.0 million (exclusive of brokers’ commissions and expenses) of Class A common stock, including the $49.0 million repurchased through November 1, 2023. The timing, volume, purchase price and nature of repurchases will be determined by our management and depend on a variety of factors, including stock price, trading volume, market and economic conditions, other general business considerations such as alternative investment opportunities, applicable legal requirements and tax laws, and other relevant factors, all of which may be further impacted by macroeconomic conditions and factors, including rising interest rates and inflation, global conflicts, and public health trends. Repurchases under the program have been authorized through February 28, 2025, but the program may be modified, suspended, or terminated at any time at the discretion of our Board, which may result in a decrease in our stock price. Additionally, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 introduced a 1% excise tax on share repurchases, which increases the costs associated with repurchasing shares of our Class A Common Stock. Through November 1, 2023, we have repurchased approximately 9.1 million shares for an aggregate amount of approximately $49.0 million (excluding brokers’ commissions and excise tax).
The existence of a share repurchase program could cause our stock price to trade higher than it otherwise would be and could potentially reduce the market liquidity for our stock. Any failure to repurchase the entire $150.0 million authorized under our share repurchase program may negatively impact our reputation, investor confidence in us, and our stock price. Even if our share repurchase program is fully implemented, it may not enhance long-term stockholder value nor may it prove to be the best use of our cash. Although share repurchase programs are intended to enhance long-term stockholder value, there is no
assurance ours will do so because our stock price may decline below the levels at which we repurchased shares and short-term stock price fluctuations could reduce the effectiveness of our program. Share repurchases could have an impact on our stock price, increase the volatility of our stock price, or reduce our available cash balance such that we may be required to seek financing to fund capital expenditures and strategic acquisitions or business opportunities.
Delaware or Washington law and provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws might delay, discourage or prevent a change in control or changes in our management, thereby depressing the market price of our Class A Common Stock.
Our status as a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may make an acquisition of our company more difficult or delay or prevent changes in control of our management. Among other things, these provisions:
•authorize the Board to issue shares of preferred stock and determine the price and other terms of those shares, including preferences and voting rights, without stockholder approval;
•permit only the Board to establish the number of directors and fill vacancies on the Board;
•establish that our Board is divided into three classes, with each class serving staggered three-year terms;
•provide that our directors may be removed only for cause;
•permit stockholders to take actions only at a duly called annual or special meeting and not by written consent;
•require that stockholders give advance notice to nominate directors or submit proposals for consideration at stockholder meetings;
•prohibit stockholders from calling a special meeting of stockholders; and
•require a super-majority vote of stockholders to amend some of the provisions described above.
In addition, because our principal executive offices are located in Washington, the anti-takeover provisions of the Washington Business Corporation Act may apply to us under certain circumstances now or in the future. These provisions prohibit a “target corporation” from engaging in any of a broad range of business combinations with any stockholder constituting an “acquiring person” for a period of five years following the date on which the stockholder became an “acquiring person.”
These provisions, alone or together, could delay, discourage or prevent a transaction involving a change in control. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors of their choosing or cause us to take other corporate actions they desire, any of which, under certain circumstances, could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our Class A Common Stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our Class A Common Stock.
Our bylaws designate a state or federal court located within the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders and also provide that the federal district courts are the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, each of which limits our stockholders’ ability to choose the judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, stockholders or employees.
Our bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for: (1) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; (2) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, stockholders, officers or other employees to us or our stockholders; (3) any action arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws; or (4) any other action asserting a claim that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine shall be the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery does not have jurisdiction, another State court in Delaware or the federal district court for the District of Delaware), except for any claim as to which such court determines that there is an indispensable party not subject to the jurisdiction of such court (and the indispensable party does not consent to the personal jurisdiction of such court within ten days following such determination), which is vested in the exclusive jurisdiction of a court or forum other than such court or for which such
court does not have subject matter jurisdiction. This provision does not apply to any action brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, or its rules and regulations.
Section 22 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, establishes concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over Securities Act claims. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to hear such claims. To prevent having to litigate claims in multiple jurisdictions and the threat of inconsistent or contrary rulings by different courts, among other considerations, our bylaws also provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States will be the sole and exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act against any person in connection with any offering of our securities, including, without limitation and for the avoidance of doubt, any auditor, underwriter, expert, control person or other defendant.
Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding or owning (or continuing to hold or own) any interest in any of our securities is deemed to have notice of and consented to the foregoing bylaw provisions. Although we believe these exclusive forum provisions benefit us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law and federal securities laws in the types of lawsuits to which each applies, the exclusive forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum of such stockholder’s choosing for disputes with us or our current or former directors, officers, stockholders or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our current and former directors, officers, stockholders and other employees. In addition, a stockholder that is unable to bring a claim in the judicial forum of such stockholder’s choosing may be required to incur additional costs in the pursuit of actions which are subject to the exclusive forum provisions described above. Our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder as a result of our exclusive forum provisions.
Further, the enforceability of similar exclusive forum provisions in other companies’ organizational documents has been challenged in legal proceedings and it is possible that a court of law could rule that these types of provisions are inapplicable or unenforceable if they are challenged in a proceeding or otherwise. If a court were to find either exclusive forum provision contained in our bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur significant additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, all of which could harm our results of operations.
General Risk Factors
If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and, as a result, the market price of our Class A Common Stock.
As a public company, we are required to comply with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. We are continuing to develop and refine our disclosure controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we will file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed in reports under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and financial officers.
We must continue to improve our internal control over financial reporting. We made our first formal assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2022 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, and once we cease to be an emerging growth company or eligible for other relief, we will be required to include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm. To achieve compliance with these requirements within the prescribed time period, we have engaged in a process to document and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting, which is both costly and challenging. In this regard, we have and will need to continue to dedicate internal resources, engage outside consultants and adopt a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented, and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting. There is a risk that we will not be able to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. For example, we determined that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective due to the existence of material weaknesses as described in Part I, Item 4 of this report, and due to these material weaknesses we also determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. Moreover, our testing, or the subsequent testing by our independent registered public accounting firm, may reveal additional deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses.
Any failure to implement and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, including the identification of one or more material weaknesses, could cause investors to lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial statements and reports, which would likely adversely affect the market price of our Class A Common Stock. In addition, we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by Nasdaq, the SEC and other regulatory authorities.
The value of our marketable securities could decline, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Our marketable securities portfolio includes various holdings, types, and maturities. The average contractual maturity of our available-for-sale investments is approximately eleven months as of September 30, 2023. Market values of these investments can be adversely impacted by various factors, including liquidity in the underlying security, credit deterioration, the financial condition of the credit issuer, foreign exchange rates, and changes in interest rates. Our marketable securities, which we consider highly-liquid investments, are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheets at their estimated fair value, but we have the ability to hold them until a market price recovery or maturity. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity (deficit). Realized gains and losses and credit loss reserves are reported within other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations. If the fair value of our marketable equity securities declines, our earnings will be reduced or losses will be increased. Furthermore, our interest income from cash, cash equivalents, and our marketable securities are impacted by changes in interest rates, and a decline in interest rates or lower investment balances would adversely impact our interest income.
Growing focus on evolving environmental, social, and governance issues (ESG) by stockholders, customers, regulators and other stakeholders may impose additional risks and costs on our business.
Environmental, social, and governance, or ESG, matters have become an area of growing and evolving focus among public company stockholders and other stakeholders, including among customers, employees, regulators and the general public in the United States and abroad. In particular, companies face heightened expectations with respect to their practices, disclosures and performance in relation to climate change, diversity, equity and inclusion, human capital management, cybersecurity, data privacy and security, and supply chains (including human rights issues), among other topics.
If we fail to meet evolving investor and stakeholder expectations on ESG matters or if we are perceived not to have responded appropriately or in a timely manner to ESG issues that are material to our business, including failing to satisfy reporting and disclosure expectations, we may experience harm to our brand and reputation, adverse press coverage, a reduction in our attractiveness as an investment, greater regulatory scrutiny and potential legal claims, greater difficulties in attracting and retaining customers and talent, and as a consequence, our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or stock price could be materially adversely affected. We also expect to incur additional costs and require additional resources to monitor, report, and comply with various ESG initiatives, including the SEC’s recently adopted cybersecurity disclosure rules and the SEC’s proposed climate change disclosure rules.
Certain estimates and information contained in this report and our other filings with the SEC are based on information from third-party sources and we do not independently verify the accuracy or completeness of the data contained in such sources or the methodologies for collecting such data. Any real or perceived inaccuracies in such estimates and information may harm our reputation and adversely affect our business.
Certain estimates and information contained in this report and other filings with the SEC, including general expectations concerning our industry and the market in which we operate, category share, market opportunity and market size, are based to some extent on information provided by third-party providers. This information involves a number of assumptions and limitations and although we believe the information from such third-party sources is reliable, we have not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of the data contained in such third-party sources or the methodologies for collecting such data. If there are any limitations or errors with respect to such data or methodologies, if investors do not perceive such data or methodologies to be accurate, or if we discover material inaccuracies with respect to such data or methodologies, our reputation, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
We are incurring significant increased expenses and administrative burdens as a public company, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Since 2021, we have incurred increased legal, accounting, administrative and other costs and expenses as a public company that Legacy Rover did not incur as a private company, and these expenses may increase even more after we are no longer an “emerging growth company.” The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including the requirements of Section 404, and the rules and regulations subsequently implemented by the SEC, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and the Nasdaq listing standards impose additional reporting and other obligations on public companies. Compliance with these requirements has increased costs, made certain activities more time-consuming, and required us to divert a significant amount of money that could otherwise be used to expand the business and achieve strategic objectives. If any issues in complying with these requirements are identified (for example, if our management or independent registered public accounting firm identifies additional material weaknesses in the internal control over financial reporting), we could incur additional costs rectifying those issues, the existence of those issues could adversely affect our reputation or investor perceptions of us, and it may be more expensive to obtain director and officer liability insurance.
Risks associated with our status as a public company may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board or as executive officers. Our public company status has made it more expensive to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we have incurred considerable costs to maintain the level of coverage that we believe is appropriate for a public company. In addition, such insurance provides for a significant retention of liability, is subject to limitations and may not cover a significant portion, or any, of the expenses we may now incur or be subject to in connection with any stockholder class action or other litigation to which we are named as a party.
As a result of filings required of a public company, our business and financial condition has become more visible, which may result in threatened or actual litigation, including by competitors and other third parties. If such claims are successful, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected and even if the claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor, these claims and the time and resources necessary to resolve them could divert the resources of our management and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We are an emerging growth company and any decision to comply only with certain reduced reporting and disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies could make our Class A Common Stock less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may choose to continue to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies but not to “emerging growth companies,” including:
•not being required to have an independent registered public accounting firm audit our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
•reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and annual report on Form 10-K; and
•exemptions from the requirements of holding non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.
As a result, stockholders may not have access to certain information that they may deem important. Our status as an emerging growth company will end as soon as any of the following takes place:
•the last day of the fiscal year in which we have at least $1.235 billion in annual revenue;
•the date we qualify as a “large accelerated filer,” with at least $700.0 million of equity securities held by non-affiliates;
•the date on which we have issued, in any three-year period, more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities; or
•the last day of the fiscal year ending after the fifth anniversary of the Caravel IPO, which is December 31, 2025.
Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have elected not to take advantage of this extended transition period.
We cannot predict if investors will find our Class A Common Stock less attractive if we choose to continue to rely on any of the exemptions afforded emerging growth companies. If some investors find our Class A Common Stock less attractive because we continue to rely on any of these exemptions, there may be a less active trading market for the Class A Common Stock and the market price of the Class A Common Stock may be more volatile and may decline.
If securities or industry analysts either do not publish research about us or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about us, our business or our industry, or if they adversely change their recommendations regarding our Class A Common Stock, the trading price and/or the trading volume of our Class A Common Stock could decline.
The trading market for our Class A Common Stock is influenced in part by the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us, our business, our market and our competitors. Overly enthusiastic opinions or estimates regarding our business or future stock price can result in volatility if performance does not meet such estimates. In addition, if one or more securities analysts initiate research with an unfavorable rating or downgrade our Class A Common Stock, provide a more favorable recommendation about our competitors or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our Class A Common Stock price will likely decline. If few securities analysts commence coverage of us, or if one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets and demand for our securities could decrease, which in turn could cause the price and trading volume of our Class A Common Stock to decline.
Future sales of Class A Common Stock in the public market could cause our share price to decline significantly, even if our business is doing well.
The market price of our Class A Common Stock could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of Class A Common Stock in the market or the perception that these sales could occur. There are a total of 179,432,117 shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding as of November 3, 2023 (excluding the last tranche of 2,192,687 Earnout Shares that may be issued, unvested RSUs and options to purchase Class A Common Stock outstanding under our employee benefit plans, and any equity awards that may be issued in the future under the 2021 ESPP and the 2021 Plan).
Certain holders of shares of our Class A Common Stock have rights, subject to some conditions, to require us to file registration statements for the public resale of their Class A Common Stock or to include such shares in registration statements that we may file for us or other stockholders. We have filed a registration statement on Form S-3 to register the resale of shares of our Class A Common Stock by certain of these holders. Any registration statement we file to register additional shares, whether as a result of registration rights or otherwise, could cause the market price of our Class A Common Stock to decline or be volatile. These holders and our affiliates may also use Rule 144 to sell their shares of our Class A Common Stock.
We have filed registration statements on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register shares of Class A Common Stock reserved for future issuance under our equity compensation plans. The Form S-8 registration statements became effective automatically upon filing, and shares covered by the registration statements became eligible for sale in the public market, subject to Rule 144 limitations applicable to affiliates. Subject to the satisfaction of applicable vesting restrictions, the shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, vesting of RSUs and other awards will be available for immediate resale in the public market. Sales of Class A Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of registration rights may make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate. These sales also could cause the trading price of our Class A Common Stock to fall and make it more difficult for investors to sell shares of our Class A Common Stock at a time and price that they deem appropriate.
Sales, short sales, or hedging transactions involving our equity securities could adversely affect the price of our Class A Common Stock.