UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549




FORM 10-K



       x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

       ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: : 1-12882

Boyd Gaming Corporation
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 
Nevada
88-0242733
  (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

2950 Industrial Road
Las Vegas, Nevada    89109

(Address of Principal Executive Offices including Zip Code)

(702) 792-7200
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Common Stock, Par Value $.01 Per Share
8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2012

 

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

      Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
YES    x        NO    ¨

      Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
YES    ¨        NO    x

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES    x        NO    ¨

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ¨

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer    x          Accelerated filer    ¨          Non-accelerated filer    ¨

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES    ¨        NO    x

      As of June 30, 2006, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange for such date, was approximately $1.8 billion.

      As of February 16, 2007, the Registrant had outstanding 87,186,222 shares of Common Stock.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

      Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant's 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the Registrant's fiscal year end of December 31, 2006 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.



     PDF provided as courtesy

Boyd Gaming Corporation
FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1.

Business

1

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

7

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

14

Item 2.

Properties

14

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

14

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

15

Item 4A.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

15

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

16

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

17

Item 7.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

19

Item 7A.

Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk

35

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

36

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

36

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

36

Item 9B.

Other Information

38

PART III

Item 10.

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

38

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

38

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

38

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

38

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

38

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

39

Signature Page

83

Part I

ITEM 1. Business

Overview

We are a multi-jurisdictional gaming company that has been operating for approximately 30 years. As of December 31, 2006, we wholly-owned and operated 16 casino facilities located in eight distinct gaming markets in five states. As of December 31, 2006, we owned an aggregate of approximately 850,000 square feet of casino space, containing approximately 23,500 slot machines, 500 table games and 7,500 hotel rooms. We derive the majority of our gross revenues from our gaming operations, which produced 74%, 74% and 75%, respectively, of gross revenues for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. Food and beverage gross revenues, which produced 12.5%, 13.0% and 12.7%, respectively, of gross revenues for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, represent the only other revenue source which produced more than 10% of gross revenues during these periods.

Significant developments affecting our business during the past five years are as follows:

  • On March 1, 2007, we completed our acquisition of Dania Jai Alai and approximately 47 acres of related land located in Dania Beach, Florida. Dania Jai Alai is one of four pari-mutuel facilities approved under Florida law to operate 1,500 Class III slot machines.
  • On February 27, 2007, we completed our exchange transaction with Harrah's Operating Company, Inc., a subsidiary of Harrah's Entertainment, Inc., or Harrah's, whereby we exchanged our Barbary Coast Hotel and Casino and its related 4.2 acres of land for approximately 24 acres located north of and contiguous to our Echelon Place development project on the Las Vegas Strip in a nonmonetary, tax-free transaction.
  • On November 1, 2006, we closed our Stardust Resort and Casino and expect to demolish the property in March 2007 to make way for our Las Vegas Strip development, Echelon Place. We plan to open Echelon Place in the third quarter of 2010.
  • On October 25, 2006, we sold our South Coast Hotel and Casino for total consideration of approximately $513 million, consisting of approximately $401 million in cash and the repurchase of approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock valued at $112 million.
  • On January 31, 2006, we expanded our Blue Chip Hotel and Casino through the construction of a single-level boat that allowed us to expand our casino and increase the number of slot machines by approximately 25%. In connection with this expansion, we also added a new parking structure and enhanced the land-based pavilion.
  • On July 1, 2004, we consummated a $1.3 billion merger in stock and cash with Coast Casinos, Inc., or Coast, pursuant to which Coast became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Boyd Gaming Corporation.
  • On May 19, 2004, we acquired all of the outstanding limited and general partnership interests of the partnership that owned the Shreveport Hotel and Casino in Shreveport, Louisiana, for approximately $197 million. After the acquisition, we renamed the property Sam's Town Hotel and Casino, and we refer to the property as Sam's Town Shreveport.
  • We and MGM MIRAGE each own 50% of a limited liability company that owns and operates Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa, a destination resort located at Renaissance Pointe in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Borgata commenced operations on July 3, 2003.
  • Delta Downs Racetrack Casino & Hotel, which we acquired on May 31, 2001, began casino operations on February 13, 2002 with approximately 1,500 slot machines and opened a 206-room hotel in March 2005.

We are subject to a variety of regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate and are required to be licensed by certain authorities in order to conduct gaming operations. A more detailed description of the regulations to which we are subject is contained in Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.

For further information related to our segment information for revenues, net income and total assets as of and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, see Note 18 to our Consolidated Financial Statements presented at Item 15, "Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules."

Business Strategy and Competitive Strengths

We believe that the following factors have contributed to our success in the past and are central to our future success:

  • we emphasize slot revenues, the most consistently profitable segment of the gaming industry;
  • we have comprehensive marketing and promotion programs;
  • six of our properties are well-positioned to capitalize on the Las Vegas locals market, making us a leader in one of the strongest and fastest-growing gaming markets in the United States;
  • our downtown Las Vegas properties focus their marketing programs on, and derive a majority of their revenues from, a unique niche - customers from Hawaii;
  • our operations are geographically diversified;
  • we have the ability to develop new and expand certain existing properties;
  • we make opportunistic and strategic acquisitions; and
  • we have an experienced management team.

Properties

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our wholly-owned properties (listed by the segment in which each such property is reported) and Borgata, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.



                                   Year     Casino                                                         Average
                                 Opened or   Space     Slot      Table     Hotel     Land     Hotel         Daily
                                 Acquired  (Sq. Ft.) Machines    Games     Rooms    (Acres)  Occupancy      Rate
                                 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------    ---------
LAS VEGAS LOCALS
Barbary Coast Hotel and Casino (1)   2004    32,800       642        36       198         4        98 %  $      84
Gold Coast Hotel and Casino          2004    85,500     2,040        48       711        26        96 %  $      64
The Orleans Hotel and Casino         2004   137,000     2,983        60     1,886        77        93 %  $      74
Sam's Town Hotel and Gambling Hal    1979   133,000     3,121        36       646        63        96 %  $      54
Suncoast Hotel and Casino            2004    95,000     2,407        45       426        49        89 %  $      95
Eldorado Casino                      1993    16,000       492         6        --         4        --           --
Jokers Wild Casino                   1993    22,500       525         7        --        15        --           --

DOWNTOWN LAS VEGAS
California Hotel and Casino          1975    36,000     1,114        28       781        16        92 %  $      33
Fremont Hotel and Casino             1985    30,200     1,113        25       447         2        92 %  $      36
Main Street Station Casino,
  Brewery and Hotel                  1993    27,000       906        19       406        15        92 %  $      38

CENTRAL REGION
Mississippi
    Sam's Town Hotel and
      Gambling Hall                  1994    75,000     1,338        38       842       272        87 %  $      52
Illinois
    Par-A-Dice Hotel Casino          1996    26,000     1,130        24       204        20        89 %  $      57
Indiana
    Blue Chip Casino Hotel           1999    65,000     2,171        52       184        37        99 %  $      57
Louisiana
    Treasure Chest Casino            1997    24,000       975        41        --        14        --           --
    Delta Downs Racetrack
      Casino & Hotel                 2001    15,000     1,462        --       206       211        87 %  $      61
    Sam's Town Hotel and Casino      2004    30,000     1,096        27       514        18        89 %  $      87
                                           --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total of wholly-owned properties            850,000    23,515       492     7,451       843
                                           --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Atlantic City, New Jersey
    Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa     2003   160,000     4,068       178     2,000        42        94 %  $     142

(1) On February 27, 2007, Barbary Coast was exchanged for 24 acres of land located north of and contiguous to our Echelon Place development project on the Las Vegas Strip.
(2) Borgata is our 50% joint venture with MGM MIRAGE.

In addition to the properties discussed above, we own and operate two travel agencies, a Hawaiian- based insurance company that underwrites travel-related insurance, and an offsite sports book located in Las Vegas. We closed the Stardust Resort and Casino on November 1, 2006 in conjunction with our Echelon Place development project which will occupy 87 acres of land on the Las Vegas Strip.

Las Vegas Locals

Our Las Vegas Locals segment consists of six casinos that serve the resident population of the Las Vegas metropolitan area, which has been one of the fastest growing areas in the United States over the last decade. Las Vegas is characterized by a historically vibrant economy and strong demographics that include a growing population of retirees and other active gaming customers. Our Las Vegas Locals segment competes directly with other locals' casinos and gaming companies, some of which operate larger casinos with superior locations.

Gold Coast Hotel and Casino

Gold Coast is located on Flamingo Road, approximately one mile west of the Las Vegas Strip and one-quarter mile west of Interstate 15, the major highway linking Las Vegas and Southern California. Its location offers easy access from all four directions in the Las Vegas valley. The primary target market for Gold Coast consists of local middle-market customers who gamble frequently. Gold Coast amenities include 711 hotel rooms, multiple restaurant options, a 70-lane bowling center and banquet and meeting space.

The Orleans Hotel and Casino

The Orleans is located on Tropicana Avenue, a short distance from the Las Vegas Strip. The target markets for The Orleans are both local residents and visitors to the Las Vegas area. The Orleans provides an exciting New Orleans French Quarter-themed environment. Amenities at The Orleans include 1,886 hotel rooms, a variety of restaurants and bars, a spa and fitness center, 18 stadium-seating movie theaters, a 70-lane bowling center, banquet and meeting space and a special events arena that seats up to 9,500 patrons.

Sam's Town Hotel and Gambling Hall

Sam's Town Hotel and Gambling Hall ("Sam's Town Las Vegas") is located on the Boulder Strip, approximately six miles east of the Las Vegas Strip and features a contemporary western theme. Its informal, friendly atmosphere appeals to both local residents and visitors alike. Amenities at Sam's Town Las Vegas include 646 hotel rooms, a variety of restaurants and bars, 18 stadium-seating movie theaters and a 56-lane bowling center. Gaming, bowling and live entertainment create a social center that attracts many Las Vegas residents to Sam's Town Las Vegas.

Suncoast Hotel and Casino

Suncoast is located in Peccole Ranch, a master-planned community adjacent to Summerlin, one of the fastest growing areas of the Las Vegas valley, and is readily accessible from most major points in Las Vegas, including downtown (approximately eight miles) and the Strip (approximately nine miles). The primary target market for Suncoast consists of local middle-market customers who gamble frequently. Suncoast is a Mediterranean-themed facility that features 426 hotel rooms, multiple restaurant options, 25,000 square feet of banquet and meeting facilities, 16 stadium-seating movie theatres and a 64-lane bowling center.

Eldorado Casino and Jokers Wild Casino

Located in downtown Henderson, Nevada, the Eldorado is approximately 14 miles from the Las Vegas Strip. Jokers Wild is also located in Henderson, Nevada. The amenities at each of these properties include keno, a sports book, and multiple dining options. The principal customers of these properties are Henderson residents.

Downtown Las Vegas Properties

Our Unique Downtown Niche

We directly compete with eight casinos that operate in downtown Las Vegas; however, we have developed a distinct niche for our downtown properties by focusing on customers from Hawaii. Our marketing strategy for the downtown properties targets gaming enthusiasts from Hawaii and tour and travel agents in Hawaii with whom we have cultivated relationships since we opened our California Hotel and Casino in 1975. Through our Hawaiian travel agency, Vacations Hawaii, we currently operate six charter flights from Honolulu to Las Vegas each week, helping to ensure a stable supply of reasonably priced air seats. We also have strong, informal relationships with other Hawaiian travel agencies and offer affordable all-inclusive packages. These relationships combined with our Hawaiian promotions have allowed the California, the Fremont and Main Street Station to capture a significant share of the Hawaiian tourist trade in Las Vegas. For the year ended December 31, 2006, patrons from Hawaii comprised approximately 67% of the occupied room nights at the California, 56% of the occupied room nights at the Fremont and 55% of the occupied room nights at Main Street Station.

California Hotel and Casino

The California's amenities include 781 hotel rooms, multiple dining options, a sports book, keno lounge and meeting space. The California and Main Street Station are connected by an indoor pedestrian bridge.

Fremont Hotel and Casino

The Fremont is adjacent to the principal pedestrian thoroughfare in downtown Las Vegas known as the Fremont Street Experience. The property's amenities include 447 hotel rooms, a race and sports book, meeting space and a 350-space parking garage.

Main Street Station Casino, Brewery and Hotel

Main Street Station's amenities include 406 hotel rooms, three restaurants and a brewery. In addition, Main Street Station features a 96-space recreational vehicle park, the only such facility in the downtown area.

Central Region Properties

Our Central Region properties consist of five dockside riverboat casinos and one racino that operate in four states in the Midwest and southern sections of the United States. Generally, these states allow casino gaming on a limited basis through the issuance of a limited number of gaming licenses. Our Central Region properties generally serve customers within a 100-mile radius and compete directly with other casino facilities operating in their respective immediate and surrounding market areas, as well as with gaming operations in surrounding jurisdictions.

Sam's Town Hotel and Gambling Hall

Sam's Town Hotel and Gambling Hall ("Sam's Town Tunica") is located in Tunica County, Mississippi. The property has extensive amenities, including 842 hotel rooms, an entertainment lounge, four dining venues, a specialty shop, and the 1,650-seat River Palace Arena. Sam's Town Tunica and two other neighboring casino properties are each one-third partners in an entity that owns River Bend Links, an eighteen-hole championship golf course. Tunica is the closest gaming market to Memphis, Tennessee and is located off of State Highway 61, approximately 30 miles south of Memphis. The adult population within a 200-mile radius is over three million people and includes the cities of Nashville and Memphis in Tennessee, Jackson, Mississippi and Little Rock, Arkansas.

Par-A-Dice Hotel Casino

Par-A-Dice is a riverboat casino operating dockside on the Illinois River in East Peoria, Illinois. Located adjacent to the Par-A- Dice riverboat is a land-based pavilion that features a 204-room hotel, three restaurants, a cocktail lounge, gift shop and banquet/meeting space. Par-A-Dice is strategically located within three-quarters of a mile from Interstate 74, a major east-west interstate highway. Par-A-Dice is the only gaming facility located within approximately 90 miles of Peoria, Illinois.

Treasure Chest Casino

Treasure Chest is a dockside casino located on Lake Pontchartrain in the western suburbs of New Orleans, Louisiana. The property is designed as a classic 18th-century Victorian-style paddle-wheel riverboat and has a total capacity for 1,750 people. The entertainment complex located adjacent to the riverboat houses a 140-seat Caribbean showroom, as well as several restaurants. Located approximately five miles from the New Orleans International Airport, Treasure Chest primarily serves residents of suburban New Orleans.

  Blue Chip Casino Hotel

Blue Chip is a riverboat gaming property located in Michigan City, Indiana, which is 60 miles east of Chicago, Illinois and 40 miles west of South Bend, Indiana. To the west, the property competes primarily with four casinos in northern Indiana and, to a lesser extent, with casinos in the Chicago area. On January 31, 2006, we began operations on our newly constructed single-level dockside riverboat. The new boat allowed us to expand our casino to 2,171 slot machines and 52 table games. In connection with the construction of our new boat, we added a new parking structure and enhanced the land-based pavilion. In October 2006, we announced a $130 million expansion project at Blue Chip that will add a second hotel with approximately 300 guest rooms to our existing 184-room hotel, a spa and fitness center, additional meeting and event space as well as more dining and nightlife experiences. We expect to begin construction on the project during the first quarter 2007 and it is expected to open in late 2008.

The Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, a federally recognized Native American tribe, is currently constructing a land-based gaming operation near New Buffalo, Michigan approximately fifteen miles from Blue Chip and they expect to open the facility in August 2007. This facility could have a material adverse impact on the operations of Blue Chip. In Illinois, there is currently an additional casino license that is the subject of litigation and administrative action. If a gaming facility is opened, depending on its location, it could compete with Blue Chip.

Delta Downs Racetrack Casino & Hotel

In 2001, we acquired substantially all of the assets of the Delta Downs Racetrack in Vinton, Louisiana. Delta Downs has historically conducted horse races on a seasonal basis and operated year-round simulcast facilities for customers to wager on races held at other tracks. In 2002, we began slot operations in connection with a renovation project that expanded the facility and equipped the casino. In 2004, we completed an expansion of the casino and in March 2005, we completed construction on and opened a 206- room hotel at the property.

Delta Downs is approximately 25 miles closer to Houston than the next closest gaming market, located in Lake Charles, Louisiana. Customers traveling from Houston, Beaumont and other parts of southeastern Texas will generally have to drive past Delta Downs to reach Lake Charles.

Sam's Town Hotel and Casino

Sam's Town Hotel and Casino ("Sam's Town Shreveport") is located along the Red River in Shreveport, Louisiana. The property features a 19 th century themed riverboat casino. Other amenities at the property include 514 hotel rooms, a spa, heated pool, four restaurants, a live entertainment venue and convention and meeting space. Feeder markets include east Texas, Texarkana, Arkansas and surrounding Louisiana cities including Bossier City, Minden, Ruston and Monroe. The continued expansion of Native American gaming in Oklahoma could have a material adverse impact on the operations of Sam's Town Shreveport.

Borgata

Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa opened at Renaissance Point in Atlantic City, New Jersey on July 3, 2003. Atlantic City is predominantly a regional day-trip and overnight-trip market. Borgata directly competes with ten other Atlantic City licensees as well as with gaming operations in surrounding jurisdictions.

Borgata is an equity-method joint venture. We and MGM MIRAGE each own a 50% interest in this entity. As the managing venturer, we are responsible for the day-to-day operations of Borgata, including the operation and maintenance of the facility. Borgata employs a management team and full staff to perform these services for the property. We maintain the oversight and responsibility for the operations, but do not directly operate Borgata. As such, we do not receive a management fee from Borgata.

Borgata is an upscale destination resort that features 14 restaurants, 13 retail boutiques and a European-style health spa. The property also contains meeting and event space as well as several entertainment venues. In June 2006, Borgata completed a $200 million expansion that added both gaming and non-gaming amenities, including additional slot machines, table games, poker tables, restaurants and a nightclub. In addition to this expansion, in January 2006, construction began on a $400 million project that will add a second hotel at Borgata and additional meeting space. This expansion project is expected to be completed in early 2008. Borgata expects to finance the expansion from Borgata's cash flow from operations and from Borgata's bank credit agreement. We do not expect to make further capital contributions to Borgata for this expansion project.

New Projects

Echelon Place

In January 2006, we announced plans to develop Echelon Place on the Las Vegas Strip. We expect to commence construction in the second quarter 2007, with a planned third quarter 2010 opening. We recently completed the schematic design phase of the project and have increased the budget for the wholly-owned components of Echelon Place to $3.3 billion, principally as a result of additional scope, larger guest rooms and suites, and increased estimated construction costs. We continue to perform design and development work on the two joint-venture elements of Echelon Place, which include a retail promenade and our hotel joint venture with Morgans Hotel Group LLC, or Morgans.

Echelon Place will include a total of approximately 5,000 rooms in five unique hotels, including the following amenities:

  • Casino space: 140,000 square feet
  • Entertainment venues: 4,000-seat and 1,500-seat theaters, operated by AEG Live
  • Retail promenade: 300,000 square feet
  • Meeting and Convention space: 750,000 square feet
  • Parking: approximately 9,000 spaces

Echelon Place will also include approximately 30 dining, nightlife and beverage venues in addition to an approximately 4.5 acre multi-level pool and recreation deck.

On February 27, 2007, we exchanged the Barbary Coast for 24 acres, which will bring our total land holdings to 87 contiguous acres on the Echelon Place site. The additional land allowed us to modify the site layout of Echelon Place, increases the overall size of the project to 65 acres and will provide us with two additional parcels of six and 16 acres that could allow for the addition of another distinct hotel, a residential component, and additional retail, dining, meeting and casino space.

In connection with our joint venture with Morgans to develop, construct and operate the Delano Las Vegas and the Mondrian Las Vegas hotels, we will contribute approximately 6.1 acres of land and Morgans will contribute $91.5 million to the venture, and the venture will arrange non-recourse project financing. Morgans is expected to begin construction in the first quarter 2008.

Acquisition of Dania Jai Alai

On June 5, 2006, we entered into a purchase agreement to acquire Dania Jai Alai and approximately 47 acres of related land located in Dania Beach, Florida. Dania Jai Alai is one of four pari-mutuel facilities approved under Florida law to operate 1,500 Class III slot machines. We expect to finance the acquisition through availability under our bank credit facility.

On August 8, 2006, a three-judge panel of the First District Court of Appeals in Broward County, Florida overturned a lower court decision which in turn could lead to the invalidation of a November 2004 initiative approved by Florida voters to operate slot machines at certain pari-mutuel gaming facilities in Broward County. This decision was essentially reaffirmed by the First District Court of Appeals on November 30, 2006, with two questions being certified to the Florida Supreme Court. If the initiative is invalidated, we may not be able to operate slot machines at the Dania Jai Alai facility, which would materially affect any potential revenue and cash flow expected from the Dania Jai Alai facility. See Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors-We face risks associated with growth and acquisitions."

In February 2007, we received our slot license for our acquisition of Dania Jai Alai. We also modified our agreement to purchase this operation. Under the revised agreement, we are required to pay an aggregate of $77.5 million upon closing of this transaction, and we will be required to pay an additional $75 million in March 2010, or earlier, if certain conditions are satisfied. We will not record a liability for the additional $75 million obligation until the contingency has been resolved and the consideration is distributable. At that time, the $75 million payment will be added to the cost of the acquisition. We closed the transaction on March 1, 2007 and we plan to begin construction in the second half of 2007 with a grand opening of the casino operation around the end of 2008.

North Las Vegas Locals Casino

In February 2006, we purchased a 40-acre parcel in North Las Vegas for approximately $35 million for the development of a Las Vegas locals casino. We plan on developing a full-service casino hotel on this site; however, we do not anticipate beginning construction in mid-2007 as previously contemplated, as we are continuing to evaluate the development of infrastructure improvements and the pace of population growth in the area.

Employees

At December 31, 2006, we employed approximately 18,300 persons. On such date, we had collective bargaining relationships with two unions covering approximately 1,500 employees, substantially all of whom are employed at Fremont, Eldorado, Main Street Station, Barbary Coast and Blue Chip. Several collective bargaining agreements are currently in effect and other agreements are in various stages of negotiation. Employees covered by expired agreements have continued to work during the negotiations, in one case under the terms of the expired agreements and, in another, under modifications thereof.

Corporate History, Availability of Reports and Corporate Governance Information

We were incorporated in Nevada in June 1988. Our principal executive offices are currently located at 2950 Industrial Road, Las Vegas, NV 89109, and our main telephone number is (702) 792-7200. Our website is www.boydgaming.com. We make our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to these reports available free of charge on our corporate website as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. In addition, our Code of Business Conduct, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation and Stock Option Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are available on our website. We will provide reasonable quantities of electronic or paper copies of filings free of charge upon request. In addition, we will provide a copy of the above referenced charters to stockholders upon request.

 

Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements include statements regarding:

  • the factors that contribute to our on-going success and our ability to be successful in the future;
  • our ability to capture a significant share of the Hawaiian tourist trade and remain a leading destination for visitors from Hawaii;
  • capitalization on the Las Vegas market and our leadership in one of the strongest and fastest growing markets in the United States;
  • our strategy;
  • competition, including expansion of gaming into additional markets and new projects such as that proposed by the Pokagons in Michigan and our ability to respond to competition;
  • expenses;
  • indebtedness, including our ability to refinance or pay amounts outstanding under the bank credit facility and notes when they become due and our compliance with related covenants;
  • financing;
  • revenue and our ability to generate significant cash flow;
  • our ability to meet our projected operating and maintenance capital expenditures and the costs associated with our expansion, renovations and development of new projects;
  • ability to continue to pay dividends or to pay any specific rate of dividends, including assumptions made in connection with our Black-Scholes option pricing model;
  • Adjusted EBITDA and its usefulness as a measure of operating performance or valuation;
  • the impact of SFAS No. 123R, FASB Interpretation No. 48 and other new accounting pronouncements on our consolidated financial statements;
  • operations;
  • earnings;
  • the rebuilding of the Gulf Coast and the effects on our operations at Treasure Chest;
  • our market risk exposure and ability to minimize risk;
  • expansion, development and renovation plans at Borgata, Blue Chip, Echelon Place, Dania Jai Alai and North Las Vegas including expected costs, financing and timing, including statements under the heading " New Projects ";
  • development opportunities in new jurisdictions and our ability to successfully take advantage of such opportunities;
  • regulations, including anticipated taxes, tax credits or tax refunds expected, and the ability to receive and maintain necessary approvals for our projects;
  • estimated undiscounted cash flows at Sam's Town Tunica and our analysis of such asset's impairment;
  • pending litigation;
  • our overall outlook, including all statements under the heading " Overall Outlook " in Item 7. " Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ";
  • our ability to receive insurance reimbursement and our estimates of self-insurance accruals and future liability;
  • compliance with applicable laws; and
  • expectations, plans, beliefs, hopes or intentions regarding the future.

Forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those discussed in any such statement. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements include the risks described in greater detail in the following section entitled " Risk Factors ." All forward-looking statements in this document are made as of the date hereof, based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statement.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

An investment in our securities is subject to risks inherent to our business. The material risks and uncertainties that our management believes affect us are described below.

Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report, including the discussion set forth under the heading " Legal Proceedings " that provides a description of our current material litigation claims and assessments. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties that our management is not aware of or focused on or that they currently deem immaterial may also adversely affect our business operations. This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the value of our securities, including our common stock, could decline significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Intense competition exists in the gaming industry, and we expect competition to continue to intensify.

The gaming industry is highly competitive for both customers and employees, including those at the management level. We compete with numerous casinos and casino hotels of varying quality and size in market areas where our properties are located. We also compete with other non-gaming resorts and vacation areas, and with various other casino and other entertainment businesses and could compete with any new forms of gaming that may be legalized in the future. The casino entertainment business is characterized by competitors that vary considerably in their size, quality of facilities, number of operations, brand identities, marketing and growth strategies, financial strength and capabilities, level of amenities, management talent and geographic diversity. In most markets, we compete directly with other casino facilities operating in the immediate and surrounding market areas. In some markets, we face competition from nearby markets in addition to direct competition within our market areas.

In recent years, with fewer new markets opening for development, competition in existing markets has intensified. We have invested in expanding existing facilities, such as Blue Chip, developing new facilities, such as Echelon Place, and acquiring established facilities in existing markets, such as our acquisition of Coast Casinos, Inc. in July 2004. In addition, our competitors have also invested in expanding their existing facilities and developing new facilities. This expansion of existing casino entertainment properties, the increase in the number of properties and the aggressive marketing strategies of many of our competitors have increased competition in many markets in which we compete, and this intense competition can be expected to continue.

If our competitors operate more successfully than we do, if they are more successful than us in attracting and retaining employees, if their properties are enhanced or expanded, or if additional hotels and casinos are established in and around the locations in which we conduct business, we may lose market share or the ability to attract or retain employees. In particular, the expansion of casino gaming in or near any geographic area from which we attract or expect to attract a significant number of our customers could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We also compete with legalized gaming from casinos located on Native American tribal lands. A proliferation of Native American gaming in areas located near our properties, or in areas in or near those from which we draw our customers, could have an adverse effect on our operating results.

The Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, a federally recognized Native American tribe, is currently constructing a land-based gaming operation near New Buffalo, Michigan approximately fifteen miles from Blue Chip and they expect to open the facility in August 2007. This facility could have a material adverse impact on the operations of Blue Chip. In Illinois, there is currently an additional casino license that is the subject of litigation and administrative action. If a gaming facility is opened, depending on its location, it could compete with Blue Chip.

Our expansion, development and renovation projects may face significant risks inherent in construction projects or implementing a new marketing strategy, including receipt of necessary government approvals.

We regularly evaluate expansion, development and renovation opportunities. On January 4, 2006, we announced our planned Las Vegas Strip development, Echelon Place, which will be the largest and most expensive development project we have undertaken to date. In addition, we announced our acquisition of Dania Jai Alai, a new hotel expansion project at Blue Chip and that Borgata has recently completed a public space expansion and is constructing a new hotel tower and spa.

These projects and any other development projects we may undertake will be subject to the many risks inherent in the expansion or renovation of an existing enterprise or construction of a new enterprise, including unanticipated design, construction, regulatory, environmental and operating problems and lack of demand for our projects. Our current and future projects could also experience:

  • unanticipated delays and cost increases;
  • shortages of materials;
  • shortages of skilled labor or work stoppages;
  • unforeseen construction scheduling, engineering, environmental, permitting, construction or geological problems; and
  • weather interference, floods, fires or other casualty losses.

Our anticipated costs and construction periods for projects are based upon budgets, conceptual design documents and construction schedule estimates prepared by us in consultation with our architects and contractors. Many of these costs are estimated at inception of the project and can change over time as the project is built to completion. For example, we announced that the construction budget for The Water Club at Borgata increased from $325 million to $400 million due to higher costs for construction materials, vendor consolidation, and the demand for contractors in the Atlantic City region. Similar cost increases could likely occur in the course of the development of Echelon Place; for example, we anticipate that the project costs associated with the properties that will be developed and constructed in connection with our joint venture with Morgans will likely exceed our original estimates. The cost of any project may vary significantly from initial budget expectations, and we may have a limited amount of capital resources to fund cost overruns. If we cannot finance cost overruns on a timely basis, the completion of one or more projects may be delayed until adequate funding is available. The completion dates of any of our projects could also differ significantly from expectations for construction-related or other reasons. We cannot assure you that any project will be completed, if at all, on time or within established budgets, or that any project will result in increased earnings to us. Significant delays, cost overruns, or failures of our projects to achieve market acceptance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, our projects may not help us compete with new or increased competition in our markets.

Certain permits, licenses and approvals necessary for some of our current or anticipated projects have not yet been obtained. The scope of the approvals required for expansion, development or renovation projects can be extensive and may include gaming approvals, state and local land-use permits and building and zoning permits. Unexpected changes or concessions required by local, state or federal regulatory authorities could involve significant additional costs and delay the scheduled openings of the facilities. We may not receive the necessary permits, licenses and approvals or obtain the necessary permits, licenses and approvals within the anticipated time frame, or at all.

In addition, although we design our projects for existing facilities to minimize disruption of existing business operations, expansion and renovation projects require, from time to time, portions of the existing operations to be closed or disrupted. For example, our Echelon Place project will require the demolition of the Stardust. Any significant disruption in operations could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face risks associated with growth and acquisitions.

As part of our business strategy, we regularly evaluate opportunities for growth through development of gaming operations in existing or new markets, through acquiring other gaming entertainment facilities or through redeveloping our existing gaming facilities. For example, we recently announced our Echelon Place development project, the closing of the Barbary Coast exchange transaction, our acquisition of Dania Jai Alai and an expansion project at Blue Chip. We also pursue expansion opportunities, including joint ventures, in jurisdictions where casino gaming is not currently permitted in order to be prepared to develop projects upon approval of casino gaming. The expansion of our operations, whether through acquisitions, development or internal growth could divert management's attention and could also cause us to incur substantial costs, including legal, professional and consulting fees. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify, acquire, develop or profitably manage additional companies or operations or successfully integrate such companies or operations into our existing operations without substantial costs, delays or other problems. Additionally, there can be no assurance that we will receive gaming or other necessary licenses for our new projects or that gaming will be approved in jurisdictions where it is not currently approved.

In addition, ballot measures or other voter approved initiatives to allow gaming in jurisdictions where gaming, or certain types of gaming (such as slots), was not previously permitted could be challenged, and, if such challenges are successful, these ballot measures or initiatives could be invalidated. For example, in October 2004, a group of plaintiffs brought suit in the Circuit Court in Leon County, Florida, against a group of defendants, including the Florida Secretary of State among others, seeking to permanently enjoin a proposed ballot measure to amend the Florida Constitution to allow Florida voters to approve slot machines at certain pari-mutuel gaming facilities in Miami-Dade and Broward Counties (the "Slot Initiative"). The plaintiffs alleged that petition gatherers committed fraud in obtaining signatures to get the Slot Initiative placed on the ballot. Prior to the issuance of a final order by the Circuit Court, the Slot Initiative was approved by voters in November 2004. In January 2005, the Circuit Court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, citing among other reasons, that the Slot Initiative had been approved by voters. The plaintiffs appealed this decision, and on August 8, 2006, a three-judge panel of the First District Court of Appeals in Broward County, Florida, reversed the Circuit Court decision and ordered that the case be brought to trial. In its decision, the panel indicated that in the event that the trial court determines that the petition did not have sufficient signatures to place the Slot Initiative on the ballot due to fraud, the trial court should invalidate the Slot Initiative. On August 23, 2006, the defendants filed a motion seeking a rehearing by the three-judge panel, or alternatively, to have the First District Court of Appeals rehear the case en banc or to have the case certified to the Florida Supreme Court for rehearing. On November 30, 2006, the First District Court of Appeals, in an en banc decision, essentially reaffirmed the panel's decision, but certified two questions to the Florida Supreme Court: (1) whether validations of signatures by supervisors of elections can be challenged based upon allegations of fraud after certifications of signatures have been accepted by the Secretary of State and the ballot printed and absentee voting commenced in accord with Florida law, and (2) whether an amendment to the Florida Constitution that is approved by vote of the electors may be subsequently invalidated if, in an action filed before the election, there is a showing made after the election that necessary signatures on the petition proposing the amendment were fraudulently obtained. The Florida Supreme Court is now considering whether to accept jurisdiction to hear the certified questions. If the Slot Initiative is invalidated, we may not be able to operate slot machines at the Dania Jai Alai facility, which would materially affect any potential revenue and cash flow expected from the Dania Jai Alai facility.

If we are unable to finance our expansion, development and renovation projects as well as other capital expenditures through cash flow, borrowings under our bank credit facility and additional financings, our expansion, development and renovation efforts will be jeopardized.

We intend to finance our current and future expansion, development and renovation projects, as well as our other capital expenditures, primarily with cash flow from operations, borrowings under our bank credit facility and equity or debt financings. If we are unable to finance our current or future expansion, development and renovation projects, or our other capital expenditures, we will have to adopt one or more alternatives, such as reducing or delaying planned expansion, development and renovation projects as well as other capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring debt, reducing the amount or discontinuing the distribution of dividends, obtaining additional equity financing or joint venture partners, or modifying our bank credit facility. These sources of funds may not be sufficient to finance our expansion, development and renovation projects, and other financing may not be available on acceptable terms, in a timely manner or at all. In addition, our existing indebtedness contains certain restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness. If we are unable to secure additional financing, we could be forced to limit or suspend expansion, development and renovation projects and other capital expenditures, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we are not ultimately successful in dismissing the action filed against our Treasure Chest Casino property, we may potentially lose our ability to operate the Treasure Chest Casino property and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Alvin C. Copeland is the sole shareholder of an entity that applied in 1993 for a riverboat license at the location of our Treasure Chest Casino. Copeland was unsuccessful in the application process and has made several attempts to have the Treasure Chest license revoked and awarded to his company. In 1999, Copeland filed a direct action against Treasure Chest and certain other parties seeking the revocation of Treasure Chest's license, an award of the license to him and monetary damages. The suit was dismissed by the trial court citing that Copeland failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The dismissal was appealed by Copeland to the Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal. In 2002, the First Circuit Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's decision and remanded the matter to the trial court. In 2003, we filed a motion to dismiss the matter and that motion was denied. The Court of Appeal refused to reverse the denial of the motion to dismiss. In May 2004, we filed additional motions to dismiss on other grounds, which motions are currently pending. It is not possible to determine the likely date of trial, if any, at this time. We intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit. If this matter ultimately results in the Treasure Chest license being revoked, it could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to extensive governmental gaming regulation and taxation policies, which may harm our business.

We are subject to a variety of regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Regulatory authorities at the federal, state and local levels have broad powers with respect to the licensing of casino operations and may revoke, suspend, condition or limit our gaming or other licenses, impose substantial fines and take other actions, any one of which could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. A more detailed description of the regulations to which we are subject is contained in Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.

If additional gaming regulations are adopted in a jurisdiction in which we operate, such regulations could impose restrictions or costs that could have a significant adverse effect on us. From time to time, various proposals are introduced in the legislatures of some of the jurisdictions in which we have existing or planned operations that, if enacted, could adversely affect the tax, regulatory, operational or other aspects of the gaming industry and our company. Legislation of this type may be enacted in the future. For example, on January 15, 2006, the New Jersey State Legislature enacted the Smoke-Free Air Act that became effective April 15, 2006. This law called for smoke-free environments in essentially all indoor workplaces and places open to the public including places of business and service-related activities. The law contains several exemptions including an exemption for all casino floor space and 20% of a hotel's designated hotel rooms. On February 15, 2007, Atlantic City promulgated a local ordinance that is more restrictive than the aforementioned state law. Specifically this ordinance reduced the casino floor exemption to 25% of a casino's floor space. As such, smoking will be prohibited on 75% of a casino's floor space and permitted on 25% of a casino's floor space subject to the following conditions:

  • By April 15, 2007, casinos are required to limit smoking to 25% of their casino floor space, which areas initially will not be required to be enclosed and separately ventilated.
  • Ultimately, the 25% of the casino floor in which smoking would be permissible will be required to be enclosed and separately ventilated. Casinos will have five months from April 15, 2007 to submit construction plans for such enclosures to applicable authorities for the issuance of building permits and related required approvals. Once permits are issued, the casinos will have 90 days to commence construction of the enclosures.

Under the Atlantic City ordinance, smoking will remain permissible in 20% of a hotel's designated hotel rooms, consistent with state law. This legislation, and the local ordinance, could materially impact Borgata's operations.

The federal government has also previously considered a federal tax on casino revenues and may consider such a tax in the future. In addition, gaming companies are currently subject to significant state and local taxes and fees in addition to normal federal and state corporate income taxes, and such taxes and fees are subject to increase at any time. For example, in June 2006, the Illinois legislature passed certain amendments to the Riverboat Gambling Act which affected the tax rate at Par-A-Dice. The legislation, which imposes an incremental 5% tax on adjusted gross gaming revenues, was retroactive to July 1, 2005. As a result of this legislation, we were required to pay additional taxes, resulting in a $6.7 million tax assessment in June 2006. If there is any material increase in state and local taxes and fees, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our directors, officers and key employees must also be approved by certain state regulatory authorities. If state regulatory authorities were to find a person occupying any such position unsuitable, we would be required to sever our relationship with that person. Certain public and private issuances of securities and certain other transactions by us also require the approval of certain state regulatory authorities.

In addition to gaming regulations, we are also subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations. These laws and regulations include, but are not limited to, restrictions and conditions concerning alcoholic beverages, environmental matters, employees, currency transactions, taxation, zoning and building codes, and marketing and advertising. Such laws and regulations could change or could be interpreted differently in the future, or new laws and regulations could be enacted. For example, on July 5, 2006, New Jersey gaming properties, including Borgata, were required to temporarily close their casinos for three days as a result of a New Jersey statewide government shutdown that affected certain New Jersey state employees required to be at casinos when they are open for business.

Material changes, new laws or regulations, or material differences in interpretations by courts or governmental authorities could adversely affect our business and our operating results.

Certain of our facilities are located in areas that experience extreme weather conditions.

Certain of our facilities are located in areas that experience extreme weather conditions, including, but not limited to, hurricanes. Extreme weather conditions may interrupt our operations, damage our properties and reduce the number of customers who visit our facilities in the affected areas. For example, our Treasure Chest Casino, which is located near New Orleans, Louisiana, suffered minor damage and was closed for 44 days in 2005 as a result of Hurricane Katrina. Additionally, our Delta Downs Racetrack Casino & Hotel, which is located in southwest Louisiana, suffered significant property damage and closed for 42 days in 2005 as a result of Hurricane Rita. While we maintain insurance that may cover some of the costs we incur as a result of some extreme weather conditions, our coverage is subject to deductibles and limits on maximum benefits. There can be no assurance that we will be able to fully collect, if at all, on any claims resulting from extreme weather conditions. If any of our properties are damaged or if their operations are disrupted as a result of extreme weather in the future, or if extreme weather adversely impacts general economic or other conditions in the areas in which our properties are located or from which they draw their patrons, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

Our facilities, including our riverboats and dockside facilities, are subject to risks relating to mechanical failure and regulatory compliance.

Generally, all of our facilities are subject to the risk that operations could be halted for a temporary or extended period of time, as the result of casualty, forces of nature, mechanical failure or extended or extraordinary maintenance, among other causes. In addition, our gaming operations, including those conducted on riverboats or at dockside facilities, could be damaged or halted due to extreme weather conditions.

We currently conduct our Treasure Chest, Par-A-Dice, Blue Chip and Sam's Town Shreveport gaming operations on riverboats. Each of our riverboats must comply with U.S. Coast Guard requirements as to boat design, on-board facilities, equipment, personnel and safety. Each riverboat must hold a Certificate of Inspection for stabilization and flotation, and may also be subject to local zoning codes. The U.S. Coast Guard requirements establish design standards, set limits on the operation of the vessels and require individual licensing of all personnel involved with the operation of the vessels. Loss of a vessel's Certificate of Inspection or American Bureau of Shipping approval would preclude its use as a casino.

U.S. Coast Guard regulations require a hull inspection for all riverboats at five-year intervals. Under certain circumstances, extensions may be approved. The U.S. Coast Guard may require that such hull inspections be conducted at a U.S. Coast Guard- approved dry-docking facility, and if so required, the cost of travel to and from such docking facility, as well as the time required for inspections of the affected riverboats, could be significant. To date, the U.S. Coast Guard has allowed in-place inspections of our riverboats. The U.S. Coast Guard may not allow these types of inspections in the future. The loss of a dockside casino or riverboat casino from service for any period of time could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

U.S. Coast Guard regulations also require us to prepare and follow certain security programs. In 2004, we implemented the American Gaming Association's Alternative Security Program at our riverboat casinos and dockside facilities. The American Gaming Association's Alternative Security Program is specifically designed to address riverboat casinos and their respective dockside facilities maritime security requirements. Changes to these regulations could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We draw a significant percentage of our customers from limited geographic regions. Events adversely impacting the economy or these regions, including terrorism, may also impact our business.

Our California Hotel and Casino, Fremont Hotel and Casino and Main Street Station Casino, Brewery and Hotel draw a substantial portion of their customers from the Hawaiian market. For the year ended December 31, 2006, patrons from Hawaii comprised approximately 67% of the room nights sold at the California, 56% at the Fremont and 55% at Main Street Station. An increase in fuel costs or transportation prices, a decrease in airplane seat availability, or a deterioration of relations with tour and travel agents, particularly as they affect travel between the Hawaiian market and our facilities, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our Las Vegas properties also draw a substantial number of customers from certain other specific geographic areas, including Southern California, Arizona and Las Vegas. Native American casinos in California and other parts of the United States have diverted some potential visitors away from Nevada, which has had and could continue to have a negative effect on Nevada gaming markets. In addition, due to our significant concentration of properties in Nevada, any terrorist activities or disasters in or around Nevada, or the areas from which we draw customers for our Las Vegas properties, could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Each of our other properties located outside of Nevada depends primarily on visitors from their respective surrounding regions and are subject to comparable risk. The outbreak of public health threats at any of our properties or in the areas in which they are located, or the perception that such threats exist, as well as adverse economic conditions that affect the national or regional economies, whether resulting from war, terrorist activities or other geopolitical conflict, weather or other factors, could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, to the extent that the airline industry is negatively impacted due to the outbreak of war, public health threats, terrorist or similar activity, increased security restrictions or the public's general reluctance to travel by air, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be significantly adversely affected.

Energy price increases may adversely affect our cost of operations and our revenues.

Our casino properties use significant amounts of electricity, natural gas and other forms of energy. In addition, our Hawaiian air charter operation uses a significant amount of jet fuel. While no shortages of energy or fuel have been experienced to date, substantial increases in energy and fuel prices in the United States have negatively affected and may continue to negatively affect our operating results. The extent of the impact is subject to the magnitude and duration of the energy and fuel price increases, but this impact could be material. In addition, energy and gasoline price increases in cities that constitute a significant source of customers for our properties could result in a decline in disposable income of potential customers, an increase in the cost of travel and a corresponding decrease in visitation and spending at our properties, which could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Certain of our stockholders own large interests in our capital stock and may significantly influence our affairs.

William S. Boyd, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, together with his immediate family, beneficially owned approximately 36% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of December 31, 2006. As a result, the Boyd family has the ability to significantly influence our affairs, including the election of our directors and, except as otherwise provided by law, approving or disapproving other matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders, including a merger, consolidation or sale of assets.

Some of our hotel casinos are located on leased property. If we default on one or more leases, the applicable lessors could terminate the affected leases and we may lose possession of the affected hotel casino.

We lease certain parcels of land on which The Orleans Hotel and Casino, Suncoast Hotel and Casino, Sam's Town Tunica, Treasure Chest Casino and Sam's Town Shreveport are located. In addition, we lease other parcels of land on which portions of the California and the Fremont are located. If we were to default on any one or more of these leases, the applicable lessors could terminate the affected leases and we could lose possession of the affected land and any improvements on the land, including the hotel-casinos. This would have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations as we would then be unable to operate all or portions of the affected facilities.

We have a significant amount of indebtedness.

At December 31, 2006, we had total consolidated long-term debt, less current maturities, of approximately $2.1 billion. We expect that our long-term indebtedness will substantially increase in connection with the capital expenditures we anticipate making as a result of our planned expansion, development and renovation projects. Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences. For example it could:

  • make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under our current indebtedness;
  • increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
  • require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, which would reduce the availability of our cash flows to fund working capital, capital expenditures, expansion efforts and other general corporate purposes;
  • limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
  • place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; and
  • limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants in our indebtedness, among other things, our ability to borrow additional funds. Failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could have a significant adverse effect on us.

In addition, the interest rates on a portion of our long-term debt are subject to fluctuation based upon changes in short-term interest rates. Interest expense could increase as a result of this factor.

Our current debt service requirements on our bank credit facility primarily consist of interest payments on outstanding indebtedness. The bank credit facility consists of a $1.35 billion revolving credit facility that matures in June 2010 and a $500 million term loan. The term loan is being repaid in increments of $1.25 million per quarter that began on September 30, 2004 and will continue through March 31, 2011. The remaining balance of the term loan matures in June 2011.

Debt service requirements under our senior subordinated notes at December 31, 2006 consist of semi-annual interest payments (based upon fixed annual interest rates ranging from 6.75% to 8.75%) and repayment of the $250 million, $300 million, $350 million and $250 million of principal on April 15, 2012, December 15, 2012, April 15, 2014, and February 1, 2016, respectively.

Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures and expansion efforts will depend upon our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. It is unlikely that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our bank credit facility, in amounts sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness as it matures and to fund our other liquidity needs. We believe that we will need to refinance all or part of our indebtedness at or prior to each maturity. However, we may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all. We could have to adopt one or more alternatives, such as reducing or delaying planned expenses and capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring debt, or obtaining additional equity or debt financing or joint venture partners. These financing strategies may not be effected on satisfactory terms, if at all. In addition, certain states' laws contain restrictions on the ability of companies engaged in the gaming business to undertake certain financing transactions. Some restrictions may prevent us from obtaining necessary capital.

Our common stock price may fluctuate substantially, and your investment could suffer a decline in value.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile and could fluctuate substantially due to many factors, including:

  • actual or anticipated fluctuations in our results of operations;
  • announcements of significant acquisitions or other agreements by us or by our competitors;
  • our sale of common stock or other securities in the future;
  • the trading volume of our common stock;
  • conditions and trends in the gaming and destination entertainment industries;
  • changes in the estimation of the future size and growth of our markets; and
  • general economic conditions, including, among other things, changes in the cost of fuel and air travel.

In addition, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to companies' operating performance. Broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, shareholder derivative lawsuits securities class action litigation has often been instituted against that company. Such litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management's attention and resources.

ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

ITEM 2. Properties

Information relating to the location and general characteristics of our properties appears in tabular format under Item 1. " Business - Properties " and is incorporated herein by reference.

Substantially all of our real and personal property (other than stock and other equity interests), including each of our wholly-owned casino properties, is pledged as collateral for our bank credit facility.

As of December 31, 2006, some of our hotel casinos and development projects are located on leased property, including:

  • The Stardust, which closed on November 1, 2006, was located on 72 acres of land on the Las Vegas Strip, of which 8.8 acres was leased. In connection with the completion of the Barbary Coast exchange transaction on February 27, 2007, we acquired the 8.8 acres of leased land.
  • The Orleans Hotel and Casino is located on 77 acres of leased land.
  • Suncoast Hotel and Casino is located on 49 acres of leased land.
  • California Hotel and Casino is located on 13.9 acres of owned land and 1.6 acres of leased land.
  • Fremont Hotel and Casino is located on 1.4 acres of owned land and 0.9 acres of leased land.
  • Sam's Town Tunica is located on 272 acres of leased land.
  • Treasure Chest Casino is located on 14 acres of leased land.
  • Sam's Town Hotel and Casino in Shreveport is located on 18 acres of leased land.

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings

Copeland. Alvin C. Copeland is the sole shareholder of an entity that applied in 1993 for a riverboat license at the location of our Treasure Chest Casino. Copeland was unsuccessful in the application process and has made several attempts to have the Treasure Chest license revoked and awarded to his company. In 1999, Copeland filed a direct action against Treasure Chest and certain other parties seeking the revocation of Treasure Chest's license, an award of the license to him and monetary damages. The suit was dismissed by the trial court citing that Copeland failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The dismissal was appealed by Copeland to the Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal. In 2002, the First Circuit Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's decision and remanded the matter to the trial court. In 2003, we filed a motion to dismiss the matter and that motion was denied. The Court of Appeal refused to reverse the denial of the motion to dismiss. In May 2004, we filed additional motions to dismiss on other grounds, which motions are currently pending. It is not possible to determine the likely date of trial, if any, at this time. We intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit. If this matter ultimately results in the Treasure Chest license being revoked, it could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Collective Bargaining Issue. On January 11, 2006, the parties described below entered into a memorandum of agreement to settle the outstanding claims described below. Pursuant to this agreement, among other things, the Union agreed to withdraw the outstanding litigation against us, and we agreed to withdraw the unfair labor practice charges that we previously brought against the Union. By order filed on January 23, 2006, based on a stipulation of the parties, the Court dismissed the action with each party bearing its own fees and costs.

Immediately after the merger of Coast Casinos, Inc. with Boyd Gaming Corporation ("Boyd"), the Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas (Culinary Union and Bartenders Union) ("the Union") demanded that its collective bargaining agreement ("CBA") with Mare-Bear, Inc. d.b.a. Stardust Resort and Casino ("Stardust CBA"), be extended to the Coast's Barbary Coast Hotel and Casino, which has a current and different CBA with the Union, and also to other Coast properties: Gold Coast, The Orleans and Suncoast. This demand was based on a "neutrality agreement" and other provisions of the Stardust CBA. This demand of the Union was rejected. On August 12, 2004, the Union filed a lawsuit in the U. S. District Court for the District of Nevada against Boyd and Mare-Bear, Inc., seeking to compel arbitration of alleged violations of the Stardust neutrality agreement. On September 1, 2004, Boyd filed a motion to dismiss the Union's lawsuit as to Boyd. Mare-Bear filed an answer to the complaint on September 2, 2004. On September 23, 2004, Boyd, Coast Casinos, Inc. and its subsidiary, Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc., filed a complaint for declaratory relief in the U. S. District Court against the Union, seeking a judgment that the Barbary Coast CBA continued in effect and was binding upon Boyd, the Barbary Coast and the Union. On December 15, 2004, a judgment for declaratory relief was granted on behalf of Boyd and the Barbary Coast, affirming that the Barbary Coast CBA remains in effect and is binding on Boyd, the Barbary Coast and the Union. On December 22, 2004, Boyd filed unfair labor practice charges against the Union with the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB"), alleging that the Union's lawsuit was filed for an illegal purpose and that the provisions of the Stardust agreement on which the Union relies are unlawful. Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. also filed similar unfair labor practice charges against the Union with the NLRB on December 22, 2004. On February 8, 2005, Boyd filed additional unfair labor practice charges against the Union with the NLRB, challenging the legality of the Stardust neutrality agreement. Boyd and Mare-Bear were granted a protective order by the U. S. District Court, staying discovery sought by the Union, pending the Court's ruling on Boyd's motion to dismiss.

We are also parties to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that, except for the Copeland matter discussed previously, all pending claims, if adversely decided, would not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

There were no matters subject to a vote of our security holders during the fourth quarter of 2006.

ITEM 4A. Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following table sets forth the non-director executive officers of Boyd Gaming Corporation as of February 28, 2007:

Name

Age

        Position

Paul J. Chakmak

42

        Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer)

Brian A. Larson

51

        Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel

Jeffrey G. Santoro

45

        Vice President and Controller (principal accounting officer)

Paul J. Chakmak joined us in February 2004 as our Senior Vice President-Finance and Treasurer, and was appointed Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on June 1, 2006. Mr. Chakmak was employed by CIBC World Markets in various positions, the last of which was as managing director. CIBC World Markets is the global investment banking arm of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, a leading North American financial institution.

Brian A. Larson has served as our Secretary since February 2001 and as our Senior Vice President and General Counsel since January 1998. He became our Associate General Counsel in March 1993 and Vice President-Development in June 1993.

Jeffrey G. Santoro has been Vice President since February 2001 and Controller since May 1998. Mr. Santoro joined the Company in March 1997 as our Director of Financial Reporting.

Part II

ITEM 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "BYD." Information with respect to sales prices and record holders of our Common Stock is set forth below:

  PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK

The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low sales prices of the Common Stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange.




                                                                                        High            Low
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------  --------------  --------------
2005
     First Quarter                                                                $        58.65  $        37.70
     Second Quarter                                                                        59.25           47.75
     Third Quarter                                                                         54.99           39.05
     Fourth Quarter                                                                        50.60           37.34

2006
     First Quarter                                                                         50.72           41.50
     Second Quarter                                                                        54.72           37.63
     Third Quarter                                                                         40.29           33.10
     Fourth Quarter                                                                        48.10           38.05
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------  --------------  --------------

 

On February 16, 2007, the closing sales price of our Common Stock on the NYSE was $45.98 per share. On that date, we had approximately 1,019 holders of record of our Common Stock.

In July 2003, our Board of Directors instituted a policy of quarterly cash dividends on our common stock. Dividends are declared at our Board's discretion; however, we do expect, for the near future, to continue to pay a quarterly dividend. We are subject to certain limitations regarding the payment of dividends, such as restricted payment limitations related to our outstanding notes and our bank credit facility. The following table sets forth the cash dividends declared and paid during the two years in the period ended December 31, 2006:


                                              Dividend
                                                Per
Payment Date              Record Date          Share
------------------        ------------------ ---------
March 1, 2005             February 11, 2005  $  0.085
June 1, 2005              May 13, 2005          0.125
September 1, 2005         August 12, 2005       0.125
December 1, 2005          November 10, 2005     0.125
March 1, 2006             February 10, 2006     0.125
June 1, 2006              May 12, 2006          0.135
September 1, 2006         August 11, 2006       0.135
December 1, 2006          November 10, 2006     0.135

We did not repurchase any securities during the fourth quarter 2006 and have approximately 0.9 million shares that may yet be purchased under our share repurchase program as of December 31, 2006. Item 12 of Part III contains information concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.

ITEM 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data

We have derived the selected consolidated financial data presented below as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 from the audited consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The selected consolidated financial data presented below as of December 31, 2004 and as of and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not contained herein. Operating results for the periods presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for future years.

The following is a listing of significant events affecting our business during the five year period ended December 31, 2006:

  • On November 1, 2006, we closed our Stardust Resort and Casino and expect to demolish the property in March 2007 to make way for our Las Vegas Strip development, Echelon Place. We plan to begin construction on Echelon Place in the second quarter of 2007 and to open it in the third quarter of 2010.
  • On October 25, 2006, we sold our South Coast Hotel and Casino for total consideration of approximately $513 million, consisting of approximately $401 million in cash and the repurchase of approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock valued at $112 million. The results of South Coast are classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
  • On January 31, 2006, we expanded our Blue Chip Hotel and Casino through the construction of a single-level boat that allowed us to expand our casino and increase the number of slot machines by approximately 25%. In connection with this expansion, we also added a new parking structure and enhanced the land-based pavilion.
  • On July 1, 2004, we consummated a $1.3 billion merger in stock and cash with Coast Casinos, Inc., or Coast, pursuant to which Coast became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Boyd Gaming Corporation.
  • On May 19, 2004, we acquired all of the outstanding limited and general partnership interests of the partnership that owned the Shreveport Hotel and Casino in Shreveport, Louisiana, for approximately $197 million. After the acquisition, we renamed the property Sam's Town Hotel and Casino, and we refer to the property as Sam's Town Shreveport.
  • We and MGM MIRAGE each own 50% of a limited liability company that owns and operates Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa, a destination resort located at Renaissance Pointe in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Borgata commenced operations on July 3, 2003. In June 2006, Borgata completed a $200 million expansion that added both gaming and non-gaming amenities, including additional slot machines, table games, poker tables, restaurants and a nightclub. In addition to this expansion, in January 2006 construction began on a $400 million project that will add a second hotel at Borgata and additional meeting space. This expansion project is expected to be completed near the beginning of 2008. We use the equity method to account for our investment in Borgata.
  • In May 2001, we acquired Delta Downs Racetrack in Vinton, Louisiana. Delta Downs began casino operations in February 2002 with approximately 1,500 slot machines.

Other significant events occurring after December 31, 2006 include the following:

  • On February 27, 2007, we completed our exchange transaction, whereby we exchanged our Barbary Coast Hotel and Casino and its related 4.2 acres of land for approximately 24 acres located north of and contiguous to our Echelon Place development project on the Las Vegas Strip in a nonmonetary, tax-free transaction. The results of Barbary Coast are classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
  • On June 5, 2006, we entered into a purchase agreement to acquire Dania Jai Alai and approximately 47 acres of related land located in Dania Beach, Florida. Dania Jai Alai is one of four pari-mutuel facilities approved under Florida law to operate 1,500 Class III slot machines. In February 2007, we received our slot license for our acquisition of Dania Jai Alai. We also modified our agreement to purchase this operation. Under the revised agreement, we are required to pay an aggregate of $77.5 million upon closing of this transaction, and we will be required to pay an additional $75 million in March 2010, or earlier, if certain conditions are satisfied. We closed the transaction on March 1, 2007 and we plan to begin construction in the second half of 2007 with a grand opening of the casino operation around the end of 2008.


                                                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                                  --------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share data)               2006 (a)      2005 (b)      2004 (c)      2003 (d)      2002 (e)
------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
OPERATING DATA
Net revenues                                     $  2,192,634  $  2,161,085  $  1,707,207  $  1,253,070  $  1,228,901
Operating income                                      404,650       405,687       304,279       148,800       164,475
Income from continuing operations before cumulative
  effect of a change in accounting principle          161,348       164,368       111,286        40,933        48,224

PER SHARE DATA - DILUTED
    Income from continuing operations before
      cumulative effect of a change in accounting
      principle                                  $       1.80  $       1.82  $       1.42  $       0.62  $       0.73
                                                  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
    Weighted average diluted common shares             89,593        90,507        78,235        66,163        66,125
                                                  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
    Cash dividends declared per common share     $       0.53  $       0.46  $       0.32  $       0.15  $         --
                                                  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------



                                                                              December 31,
                                                  --------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share data)                 2006          2005          2004          2003          2002
------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Total assets                                     $  3,901,299  $  4,424,953  $  3,919,028  $  1,872,997  $  1,912,990
Long-term debt                                      2,133,016     2,552,795     2,304,343     1,097,589     1,227,324
Stockholders' equity                                1,109,952     1,098,004       943,770       441,253       408,561


 

All note references below are to Part IV, Item 15, " Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules ".

(a) 2006 includes the following pre-tax items: $20.6 million of preopening expenses (see Note 1), $11.2 million of accelerated depreciation related to the Stardust and related assets (see Note 3), $8.8 million of write-downs and other charges, net (see Note 10), and $6.7 million for a one-time retroactive gaming tax assessment at Par-A-Dice (see Note 8).

(b) 2005 includes the following pre-tax items: $64.6 million of write-downs and other charges, net (see Note 10), a $17.5 million loss on the early retirement of debt (see Note 6), $7.7 million of preopening expenses (see Note 1) and $1.5 million of retention tax credits related to hurricanes (see Note 15).

(c) 2004 includes the following pre-tax items: a $9.7 million Borgata investment tax credit, a $5.7 million one-time Indiana gaming tax charge (see Note 15), a $4.3 million loss on the early retirement of debt (see Note 6), $2.0 million of preopening expenses (see Note 1) and $1.2 million of write-downs and other charges, net (see Note 10).

(d) 2003 includes the following pre-tax items: $19.6 million of preopening expenses related to Borgata and a $3.5 million retroactive tax adjustment at Blue Chip.

(e) 2002 includes the following pre-tax items: a $15.1 million loss on the early retirement of debt, $15.8 million of preopening expenses, including expenses related to Borgata, and a $3.8 million loss on assets held for sale.

ITEM 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

As of December 31, 2006, we are a diversified operator of 16 wholly-owned gaming entertainment properties and one joint venture property. Headquartered in Las Vegas, we have gaming operations in Nevada, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Indiana and New Jersey. We aggregate certain of our properties in order to present five reportable segments: Las Vegas Locals, Stardust, Downtown Las Vegas, Central Region and our 50% joint venture that owns a limited liability company that operates Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa in Atlantic City, New Jersey. We currently own 87 acres on the Las Vegas Strip where the Stardust was located and where our Echelon Place project is currently under development.

Beginning in 2006, we have reclassified the reporting of our Coast Casinos and Boulder Strip properties so that they are now included together as part of the Las Vegas Locals segment due to their similar market characteristics. Due to the disposition of Barbary Coast on February 27, 2007 and the South Coast on October 25, 2006, the operating results from these two properties are classified as discontinued operations in our consolidating statements of operations. As such, we have reclassified their results for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 to conform to the current presentation. For further information related to our segment information, including the property compositions of each segment, the definition of Adjusted EBITDA and reconciliations of certain financial information, see Note 18 to our Consolidated Financial Statements presented at Item 15. "Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules".

Our main business emphasis is on slot revenues, which are highly dependent on the volume of customers at our properties. Gross revenues are one of the main performance indicators of our properties. Most of our revenue is cash-based, and our properties have historically generated significant operating cash flow. Our industry is capital intensive, and we rely heavily on the ability of our properties to generate operating cash flow to repay debt financing, pay income taxes, fund maintenance capital expenditures and provide excess cash for future development and the payment of dividends.

Overall Outlook

Over the past few years, we have been working to strategically position our Company for greater success by strengthening our operating foundation and effecting strategic growth in order to attempt to increase shareholder value. The following is a listing of our most recently completed areas of growth:

  • Opening of Borgata's public space expansion in June 2006, which includes three new signature restaurants and nine additional casual dining outlets, additional casino games, an 85-table poker room and an ultra lounge.
  • Expansion of Blue Chip Casino Hotel in January 2006 through the construction of a single-level boat that allowed us to expand our gaming space and increase the number of slot machines and table games. In connection with this expansion project, we also added a new parking structure and enhanced the land-based pavilion.
  • Opening of 206-room hotel at Delta Downs Racetrack Casino and Hotel in March 2005.
  • Opening of a new 461-room hotel tower at The Orleans Hotel and Casino in October 2004.
  • July 2004 merger with Coast Casinos that added several existing casino hotel properties to our portfolio.
  • May 2004 acquisition of Sam's Town Shreveport.

We are currently focused on future expansion projects at several of our properties, such as our Las Vegas Strip development, Echelon Place, which we expect to open in the third quarter of 2010. See "Development Projects" below for a more comprehensive description of all of our expansion projects.

In October 2006, we completed the sale of South Coast, which provided us with additional capital for future growth opportunities and reduced our issued and outstanding common stock by approximately 3.4 million shares. On February 27, 2007, we completed our transaction to exchange the Barbary Coast for approximately 24 acres of land on the Las Vegas Strip adjacent to our Echelon Place development project, which will allow us to strengthen our future growth pipeline. These transactions are described in more detail at " Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Position and Results of Operations - Discontinued Operations" .

In addition to our expansion projects mentioned above, we regularly evaluate opportunities for growth through development of gaming operations in existing or new markets and through acquiring other gaming entertainment facilities. For example, on March 1, 2007, we completed our acquisition of Dania Jai Alai and approximately 47 acres of related land located in Dania Beach, Florida. This transaction is described in more detail at " Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Position and Results of Operation, Other Items Affecting Liquidity - Development Projects . "

Summary Financial Results



                                                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Gross revenues
    Las Vegas Locals                                                        $    946,176  $    969,165  $    554,275
    Stardust                                                                     135,019       183,020       174,579
    Downtown Las Vegas                                                           278,737       282,363       260,377
    Central Region                                                             1,074,989       967,381       912,852
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
        Total gross revenues                                                $  2,434,921  $  2,401,929  $  1,902,083
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

Operating income                                                            $    404,650  $    405,687  $    304,279
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
     a change in accounting principle                                       $    161,348  $    164,368  $    111,286
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

Significant events that affected our 2006 results as compared to 2005, or that may affect our future results, are described below:

  • The closing of the Stardust on November 1, 2006 to make way for the development of Echelon Place. We incurred $13.4 million of property closure costs, the majority of which represents exit and disposal costs related to one-time termination benefits and contract termination costs, in addition to an $11.2 million charge for accelerated depreciation during 2006. In 2005, we recorded a $56 million non-cash impairment charge to write down the long-lived assets at Stardust to their estimated fair value.
  • The completion of our expansion project at Blue Chip on January 31, 2006, which included a new gaming vessel with an expanded casino floor located on one level. We also incurred a $28 million non-cash charge to write-off the net book value of our old Blue Chip gaming vessel in 2006.
  • We were impacted in 2005 from two hurricanes that affected certain of our Central Region properties. Treasure Chest Casino closed in August 2005 as a result of Hurricane Katrina and remained closed for 44 days, reopening in October 2005. Delta Downs Racetrack Casino & Hotel closed in September 2005 as a result of Hurricane Rita and remained closed for 42 days, reopening in November 2005. Horse races at Delta Downs resumed in April 2006. We incurred $9.3 million of net hurricane and related expenses during 2005. In 2006, we recorded a $36 million gain related to the final settlement of our insurance claims related to hurricane damages at Delta Downs.
  • A significant increase in operating results at Treasure Chest due to the economic changes resulting in an increase in discretionary leisure spending in the New Orleans area following the impact of Hurricane Katrina, which struck the Gulf Coast region in August 2005. However, as casinos and other forms of entertainment reopened in the Gulf Coast region during 2006, Treasure Chest's operating results have begun to normalize and we anticipate that they will continue to normalize as the Gulf Coast continues to rebuild.
  • An increase in operating results at Delta Downs due in part to the opening of its 206-room hotel in March 2005 and the completion of the majority of its hurricane restoration project during the three months ended March 31, 2006.
  • $21 million of non-cash share-based compensation expense in 2006 resulting from the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment on January 1, 2006; there was no such expense recorded prior to 2006.
  • Operating income from our Las Vegas Locals segment was negatively impacted by increased capacity in the market with the addition of new competition in 2006 and may continue to have a negative effect on our operating results in the future.

Our July 2004 merger with Coast Casinos is the primary reason that our 2005 operating results increased from 2004. Our operating results for 2004 contain six months of operations from the Coast properties, whereas our 2005 operating results contain a full year of operations from these properties.

Adjusted EBITDA

We have aggregated certain of our properties in order to present the five reportable segments listed in the table below. See Note 18 to our Consolidated Financial Statements presented at Item 15. "Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules," for a definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of this financial information to operating income and income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle presented in accordance with GAAP.



                                                                                       Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Adjusted EBITDA
    Las Vegas Locals                                                        $    273,797  $    299,913  $    150,976
    Stardust                                                                      15,403        24,651        18,016
    Downtown Las Vegas                                                            53,573        52,295        38,738
    Central Region                                                               257,570       224,816       191,198
    Our share of Borgata's operating income before net
        amortization, preopening and other expenses                               91,963        97,392        79,286

 

The significant factors that affected Adjusted EBITDA for 2006 as compared to 2005 are listed below:

  • Las Vegas Locals Adjusted EBITDA decreased due primarily to the addition of increased competition and promotional spending in the market, which had a negative impact on this segment's results and may continue to do so in the future.
  • Adjusted EBITDA at Stardust decreased due to a decline in customer volume as a result of the wind-down of operations and the closure of the property on November 1, 2006.
  • Significant factors that affected Central Region Adjusted EBITDA include the following items:
  • Treasure Chest's Adjusted EBITDA increased due to the increase in gross revenues coupled with lower payroll and marketing expenses at the property due to changes in operations caused by the impact of Hurricane Katrina. However, as casinos and other forms of entertainment reopened in the Gulf Coast region during 2006, Treasure Chest's Adjusted EBITDA has begun to normalize and we expect that it will continue to normalize as the Gulf Coast continues to rebuild.
  • Blue Chip's Adjusted EBITDA increased due to the increase in gross revenues related to the opening of its newly expanded casino and pavilion in January 2006, which was partially offset by an increase in marketing and promotional expenses incurred in an effort to generate trial and repeat visitation.
  • Delta Down's Adjusted EBITDA increased due to the opening of its 206-room hotel in March 2005 and the completion of the majority of its hurricane restoration project during the three months ended March 31, 2006.
  • Adjusted EBITDA from Par-A-Dice decreased primarily due to $9.8 million of additional gaming tax expense resulting from a June 2006 modification by the Illinois State Legislature requiring licensees to pay an additional 5% tax on adjusted gross gaming revenues retroactive to July 1, 2005, $6.7 million of which related to the twelve months ended June 30, 2006.
  • Adjusted EBITDA at Sam's Town Shreveport declined 27% in 2006 as compared to 2005 due primarily to a 6.3% decrease in gross revenue.
  • See " Operating Data for Borgata - our 50% joint venture in Atlantic City" for a discussion of the decrease in our Adjusted EBITDA from Borgata.

The significant factors that affected Adjusted EBITDA for 2005 as compared to 2004 are listed below:

  • Las Vegas Locals Adjusted EBITDA increased due primarily to the full year of operations of the Coast properties for 2005, following the completion of our merger with Coast in July 2004.
  • Adjusted EBITDA for the Stardust increased mainly due to the increase in gross revenues combined with lower entertainment expenses.
  • Adjusted EBITDA increased 35% for the Downtown Properties. This increase was due mainly to the growth in revenues for the period coupled with a decline in payroll expenses related to more efficient operations. This increase in Adjusted EBITDA was achieved despite a $5.4 million increase in fuel costs related to the Hawaiian charter operation.
  • Central Region Adjusted EBITDA increased due mainly to the inclusion of results from Sam's Town Shreveport which was acquired in May 2004. Other significant changes to Central Region Adjusted EBITDA are:
  • Adjusted EBITDA from Treasure Chest increased 103% due to the increase in gross revenues combined with lower payroll and marketing expenses at the property related to the change in operations resulting from the impact of the hurricane.
  • Delta Downs Adjusted EBITDA increased 18.3% due primarily to an increase in gross revenues combined with a decline in payroll expenses during the year due primarily to the change in operations resulting from the impact of the hurricane.
  • See " Operating Data for Borgata - our 50% joint venture in Atlantic City" for a discussion of the increase in our Adjusted EBITDA from Borgata.

Operating Data for Borgata - our 50% joint venture in Atlantic City

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain operating data for Borgata, our 50% joint venture in Atlantic City. We use the equity method to account for our investment in Borgata.



                                                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Gross revenues                                                              $  1,009,024  $    944,705  $    852,281
Operating income                                                                 174,988       194,623       158,572
Total non-operating expenses                                                     (21,155)      (23,435)      (25,107)
Net income                                                                       153,833       171,188       133,465

The following table reconciles the presentation of our share of Borgata's operating income.



                                                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Operating income from Borgata, as reported on our consolidated
    statements of operations                                                $     86,196  $     96,014  $     77,965
Net amortization expense related to our investment in Borgata                      1,298         1,298         1,321
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Our share of Borgata's operating income                                           87,494        97,312        79,286

Our share of Borgata's preopening expenses                                         3,260            --            --
Our share of Borgata's loss on asset disposals                                     1,209            80            --
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Our share of Borgata's operating income before net
    amortization, preopening and other expenses                             $     91,963  $     97,392  $     79,286
                                                                             ============  ============  ============


Our share of Borgata's operating income before net amortization, preopening and other expenses decreased $5.4 million in 2006 as compared to 2005. In June 2006, Borgata opened its $200 million public space expansion which resulted in higher marketing and promotional expenses, depreciation, utilities and other fixed charges that more than offset its increase in gross revenues.

Our share of Borgata's operating income before net amortization, preopening and other expenses increased $18.1 million in 2005 compared to 2004 due mainly to Borgata's increase in gross revenues. Borgata's gross revenues increased 10.8% in 2005 due primarily to increased table game and slot volume.

Borgata Tax Credits . Based on New Jersey state income tax rules, Borgata is eligible for state tax credits under the New Jersey New Jobs Investment Tax Credit ("New Jobs Tax Credit") because Borgata made a qualified investment in a new business facility that created new jobs. The total estimated available credit related to Borgata's original investment is approximately $75 million over a five-year period, subject to certain annual conditions. An incremental credit related to Borgata's public space expansion is estimated to be approximately $1.8 million over a five-year period. Borgata began receiving refunds related to this tax credit in early 2005. As such, Borgata recorded approximately $23 million of net New Jobs Tax Credits in 2004, comprised of New Jobs Tax Credits generated from the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. Borgata has recorded approximately $16.9 million and $18.7 million of net New Jobs Tax Credits in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Borgata expects to generate net New Jobs Tax Credits of approximately $17 million for 2007 and approximately $0.3 million per annum for the years 2008 through 2010. Borgata may be entitled to incremental New Jersey New Jobs Investment Tax Credits as a result of its second hotel project.

Additionally, Borgata is eligible to receive tax credits in an amount equal to 50% of its New Jersey Adjusted Net Profits Tax ("ANP Tax"), subject to capital expenditure requirements, for the state's fiscal years ended June 30, 2004 through 2006. In 2003, Borgata placed a valuation allowance of approximately $0.5 million on the credit because it had not made any qualifying capital expenditures, nor did Borgata have any definitive expansion plans. In December 2004, Borgata commenced the public space expansion and submitted the appropriate applications for reimbursement of this tax. As such, Borgata released the $0.5 million valuation allowance on the 2003 credit and realized an additional credit of $2.4 million, representing 50% of the ANP Tax paid in 2004. This $2.9 million aggregate state tax benefit is included in Borgata's statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 and a state tax benefit of $1.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively, representing 50% of the ANP Tax paid in 2006 and 2005 is included in Borgata's statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.

Operating Results - Discussion of Certain Charges

The following expenses and charges are further discussed below:



                                                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Depreciation and amortization                                               $    189,837  $    171,958  $    135,425
Preopening expenses                                                               20,623         7,690         1,953
Share-based compensation expense                                                  19,278            --            --
Deferred rent                                                                      4,630         4,936         1,994
Write-downs and other charges, net                                                 8,838        64,615         1,225

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to the completion of the Blue Chip expansion project in January 2006 and the Delta Downs expansion project in March 2005, as well as the completion of the hurricane reconstruction project at Delta Downs in March 2006. Additionally, in connection with the closure of the Stardust, we reevaluated the useful lives of all of the depreciable assets residing on the land associated with our Echelon Place development project, including our corporate office building, and we recorded an additional $11.2 million in accelerated depreciation related to these assets during 2006.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased in 2005 as compared to 2004 due primarily to the full year of depreciation and amortization from Coast Casinos and Sam's Town Shreveport that were acquired in 2004.

Preopening Expenses

  • In 2006, preopening expenses related to the following items:
  • $11.6 million for the Echelon Place project;
  • $2.6 million for the Blue Chip expansion project;
  • $1.2 million for the Pennsylvania project;
  • $1.1 million for the Dania Jai Alai project; and
  • o $4.1 million for other projects.
  • In 2005, preopening expenses related to the following items:
  • $3.5 million for the Echelon Place project;
  • $1.3 million for the Blue Chip expansion project;
  • $1.3 million for the Dania Jai Alai project; and
  • $1.6 million for other projects.
  • In 2004, preopening expenses related primarily to our unsuccessful efforts to develop gaming activities in Nebraska.

Share-Based Compensation Expense . On January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment , using the modified prospective method. This statement requires us to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). For the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded $21 million of share-based compensation expense related to continuing operations, of which $1.3 million is included in preopening expenses.

On November 2, 2006, we granted options to purchase an aggregate of approximately 1.6 million shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $39.00 per share, representing the closing market price of our common stock on that date. The fair value of this grant combined with our other share-based payment awards currently outstanding, will result in estimated share-based compensation costs of approximately $16 million for the year ending December 31, 2007. The grant of any additional share-based payment awards will increase our estimate of share-based compensation costs. Our financial statements for periods prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R do not reflect any restated amounts related to the adoption of this standard.

Deferred Rent. We record deferred rent related to certain of our Coast Casinos and Sam's Town Shreveport land leases as the cash payments under the associated leases are currently less than the amount of rent expense recorded. Deferred rent increased in 2005 due primarily to the full year of deferred rent expense from Coast Casinos and Sam's Town Shreveport due to their 2004 acquisitions. Deferred rent is recorded in selling, general, and administrative expenses on our consolidated statements of operations.

Write-downs and Other Charges, net.

In 2006, write-downs and other charges, net, primarily consist of the following:

  • A gain of $36 million recognized upon the final settlement with our insurance carrier for insurance claims related to hurricane damages at Delta Downs.
  • A $28 million non-cash charge related to the write-off of the net book value of the original Blue Chip gaming vessel in June 2006, which was replaced with a new gaming vessel in conjunction with our expansion project. After analysis of alternative uses for the original vessel, management decided in June 2006 to permanently retire the asset from further operations.
  • In connection with our Echelon Place development plan, we closed the Stardust on November 1, 2006 and expect to demolish the property in March 2007. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded $13.4 million in property closure costs, the majority of which represents exit and disposal costs related to one-time termination benefits and contract termination costs. We expect to incur approximately $11 million in property closure costs in 2007 as we ready the Stardust for its demolition.
  • A $3.0 million non-cash write-down in September 2006 related to land held for sale in Pennsylvania that we previously planned to utilize as a site for a potential gaming operation. We withdrew our application for gaming approval, which led to our decision to sell the land.

In 2005, write-downs and other charges, net, primarily consist of the following:

  • We recorded a $56 million non-cash impairment loss to write down the long-lived assets at Stardust to their estimated fair value. Because we intend to redevelop the land on which Stardust is located and our plans include demolishing Stardust's existing buildings and abandoning other related assets, we performed an impairment test for this property. This non-cash charge was the result of our calculation of the estimated remaining net cash flows for Stardust compared to the net book value of the assets expected to be demolished or abandoned. For more information about this project, see " Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Position and Results of Operations, Other Items Affecting Liquidity - Expansion Projects ."
  • Due to the effects of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on two of our properties, Treasure Chest and Delta Downs, we recorded $9.3 million of net hurricane and related expenses in 2005.

In 2004, write-downs and other charges, net, primarily consist of the following:

  • We recorded $6.5 million of merger, acquisition and transition related expenses, $5.9 million of which related to indirect and general expenses of the Sam's Town Shreveport acquisition and $0.6 million of which related to indirect, general and incremental expenses of the Coast Casinos merger.
  • We sold certain parcels of undeveloped land and other assets and recorded an aggregate gain on these sales of approximately $10.3 million.
  • A consulting agreement signed in connection with Blue Chip's purchase agreement provided for a $5.0 million contingent payment if certain tribal gaming facilities had not commenced gaming operations near our Blue Chip casino by a specified date. As tribal gaming facilities had not commenced by the specified date, we expensed and paid the $5.0 million fee during 2004.

Other Operating Items

Asset Impairment

Sam's Town Tunica reported an operating loss of $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Due to a history of operating losses at Sam's Town Tunica, we continue to test the assets of Sam's Town Tunica for recoverability pursuant to SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The asset recoverability test requires estimating Sam's Town Tunica's undiscounted future cash flows and comparing that aggregate total to the property's carrying value. As the property's estimated undiscounted future cash flows exceed its carrying value, we do not believe Sam's Town Tunica's assets to be impaired at this time; however, we will continue to monitor the performance of Sam's Town Tunica and, if necessary, continue to update our asset recoverability test under SFAS No. 144. If future asset recoverability tests indicate that the assets of Sam's Town Tunica are impaired, we will be subject to a non-cash write-down of its assets, which could have a material impact on our consolidated statement of operations.

We have significant amounts of goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we perform an annual impairment test of these assets during the second quarter of each year . If our ongoing estimates of future cash flows related to these assets are not met, we may be subject to a non-cash write-down of these assets, which could have a material impact on our consolidated statement of operations.

Blue Chip

The Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, a federally recognized Native American tribe, is currently constructing a land-based gaming operation near New Buffalo, Michigan approximately fifteen miles from Blue Chip and they expect to open the facility in August 2007. This competition could have a material adverse impact on the operations of Blue Chip.

  Other Non-Operating Costs and Expenses

Interest Expense, Net



                                                                                       Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Interest costs                                                              $    179,273  $    151,953  $    107,487
Less interest costs related to discontinued operations                           (26,247)       (2,711)       (1,299)
Less capitalized interest                                                         (7,481)      (22,930)       (5,460)
Less interest income                                                                (112)         (224)         (186)
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Interest expense, net                                                       $    145,433  $    126,088  $    100,542
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

Weighted average debt balance                                               $  2,512,676  $  2,389,741  $  1,693,423
                                                                            ============  ============  ============
Weighted average interest rate                                                      7.1%          6.4%         6.3%
                                                                            ============  ============  ============

Interest costs increased in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to an increase in the average levels of debt incurred to help finance our expansion projects. In addition, the interest rates on our variable interest rate debt increased period over period. Capitalized interest decreased in 2006 as compared to 2005 due primarily to the opening of South Coast in December 2005 and the completion of the Blue Chip expansion project in January 2006. We expect capitalized interest to increase in 2007 due primarily to the Echelon Place development project and construction of the new hotel tower at Blue Chip.

Included in the loss from discontinued operations is an allocation of interest expense related to the $401 million of debt that was repaid as a result of the South Coast disposal transaction, as well as other consolidated interest based on the ratio of: (i) the net assets of our discontinued operations less the debt repaid as a result of the South Coast disposal transaction, to (ii) the sum of total consolidated net assets and consolidated debt of the Company, other than the debt repaid as a result of the disposal transaction.

Interest costs increased in 2005 as compared to 2004 due to higher levels of outstanding debt used to help finance our 2004 merger with Coast Casinos and our 2004 acquisition of Sam's Town Shreveport. In addition, the interest rates on our variable rate debt increased in 2005. Capitalized interest was higher in 2005 due to the increased amount of cash expenditures for projects under construction in 2005, such as South Coast and the Blue Chip expansion project.

Change in Value of Derivative Instruments

During the year ended December 31, 2006, we entered into three forward starting interest rate swaps with a combined notional amount of $200 million. We determined that these derivative instruments did not meet the requirements for hedge accounting during the reporting period and have therefore recorded a $1.8 million charge for the change in fair value of these derivative instruments in our consolidated statement of operations. Effective January 1, 2007, these forward starting swaps met the requirements to qualify for hedge accounting; therefore, any future changes in the effective portion of the change in fair value of these derivative instruments will be recognized in other comprehensive income on our consolidated balance sheet.

Loss on Early Retirements of Debt

In 2005, we recorded a loss on early retirement of debt related to our $200 million principal amount of 9.25% senior notes originally due in 2009. The $17.5 million loss is comprised of the premium related to the call for redemption of these notes, unamortized deferred loan costs and the notes' market adjustments from fair value hedges. In 2004, we recorded a $4.3 million non-cash loss on early retirement of debt related to the write-off of unamortized debt fees associated with our old bank credit facility that was refinanced in 2004.

Provision for Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for continuing operations in 2006 was 35% compared to 34% in 2005 and 40% in 2004. The provision for 2005 includes a net tax benefit of $1.5 million for a tax retention credit related to the hurricanes. Included in the provision for 2004 was a $5.7 million charge, net of federal benefit, related to an adverse tax ruling in Indiana.

Income from Continuing Operations

As a result of the factors discussed above, we reported $161 million, $164 million and $111 million in income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows Summary



(In Thousands)                                                                        Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------  ----------------------------------------
                                                                                  2006          2005          2004
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
Net cash provided by operating activities                                    $    419,513  $    419,908  $    259,039
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
    Capital expenditures                                                         (436,464)     (618,444)     (268,848)
    Net proceeds from the sale of South Coast                                     401,430            --            --
    Insurance recoveries for replacement assets                                    34,450         6,000            --
    Net cash paid for Coast Casinos acquisition                                        --            --      (909,245)
    Net cash paid for Shreveport acquisition                                           --            --      (187,220)
    Investments in and advances to unconsolidated subsidiaries                     (2,966)           --       (30,807)
    Other                                                                           3,198         4,001        31,398
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
Net cash used in investing activities                                                (352)     (608,443)   (1,364,722)
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
    Net (payments) borrowings under bank credit facility                         (653,500)      446,800       844,800
    Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt                                  246,300            --       344,596
    Retirement of long-term debt                                                       --      (209,325)           --
    Dividends paid on common stock                                                (46,662)      (40,735)      (24,717)
    Proceeds from exercise of stock options                                        19,510        21,999        22,979
    Other                                                                          (3,818)       (2,521)       (9,465)
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities                              (438,170)      216,218     1,178,193
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents                         $    (19,009) $     27,683  $     72,510
                                                                              ============  ============  ============

Cash Flows from Operating Activities and Working Capital

For 2006 and 2005, respectively, we generated operating cash flow of $420 million compared to $259 million in 2004. The primary reason for the increase in operating cash flow in 2006 and 2005 as compared to 2004 is due to the addition of the operating results of Coast Casinos, which we acquired in July 2004. In addition, Borgata began distributions of its earnings to us in 2005 and distributed a total of $83 million in 2006 and $29 million in 2005. Both the joint venture agreement related to Borgata and Borgata's bank credit agreement allow for limited distributions to be made to its partners. In February 2006, Borgata amended its bank credit agreement which increased the amount of allowable distributions to us. Borgata has significant uses for its cash flows, including maintenance and expansion capital expenditures, interest payments, state income taxes and the repayment of debt. Borgata's cash flows are primarily used for its business needs and are not generally available (except to the extent distributions are paid to us) to service our indebtedness.

As of December 31, 2006 and 2005 we had balances of cash and cash equivalents of $169 million and $188 million, respectively. Working capital was $43 million and $376 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The working capital balance at December 31, 2005 is unusually high due to the reclassification of South Coast assets held for sale to current assets, as the sale transaction occurred in October 2006.

Historically, we have operated with minimal or negative levels of working capital in order to minimize borrowings and related interest costs under our bank credit facility. The revolver portion of our bank credit facility generally provides any necessary funds for our day-to-day operations, interest and tax payments as well as capital expenditures. On a daily basis, we evaluate our cash position and adjust our revolver balance as necessary by either paying it down with excess cash or borrowing under the revolver. We also plan the timing and the amounts of our capital expenditures. We believe that our bank credit facility and cash flows from operating activities will be sufficient to meet our projected operating and maintenance capital expenditures for the next twelve months. The source of funds for our development projects such as Blue Chip's new hotel tower, Echelon Place and Dania Beach, Florida is expected to come primarily from cash flows from operations, availability under our bank credit facility, to the extent availability exists after we meet our working capital needs, as well as additional funds that are expected to be generated from incremental bank financing or other additional debt. We could also fund these projects with equity offerings. Additional financing may not be available to us, or, if available, may not be on terms favorable to us.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Cash paid for capital expenditures on major projects and land acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2006, included the following:

  • South Coast expansion project, the majority of which was substantially complete on October 25, 2006, the date on which it was sold;
  • Acquisition of North Las Vegas land;
  • Acquisition of land and building for our new corporate office;
  • Hurricane restoration costs at Delta Downs;
  • The new Blue Chip vessel that opened in January 2006; and
  • Echelon Place.

Spending on these and other expansion projects totaled $308 million in 2006. Maintenance capital expenditures totaled $128 million in 2006.

Cash flows from investing activities during 2006 include $401 million in cash from the sale of the South Coast and $34 million of property insurance recoveries for the reimbursement of our capital spending related to our hurricane restoration project at Delta Downs.

Cash paid for capital expenditures in 2005 increased over 2004 due to spending on major projects and land acquisitions, including:

  • Blue Chip expansion project that opened in January 2006;
  • South Coast Hotel and Casino that opened in December 2005;
  • Delta Downs 206-room hotel that opened in March 2005 and the hurricane restoration project;
  • Acquisition of Pennsylvania land; and
  • Acquisition of land under the Barbary Coast.

Spending on these and other projects totaled $499 million in 2005. Maintenance capital expenditures totaled $119 million in 2005.

Capital expenditures in 2004 included cash paid for the Blue Chip, South Coast and Delta Downs projects noted above that were also in progress during 2004. In addition, capital expenditures in 2004 included $20 million for The Orleans hotel tower and the purchase of land adjacent to the Stardust for a purchase price of $43 million, for which we paid $27 million in cash and assumed $16 million in debt. Also in 2004, we paid net cash of $187 million for the acquisition of the partnership interests of Sam's Town Shreveport and we paid net cash of $909 million for the acquisition of Coast Casinos.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Substantially all of the funding for our acquisitions and our renovation and expansion projects comes from cash flows from existing operations, as well as debt financing and equity issuances.

On January 30, 2006, we issued $250 million principal amount of 7.125% senior subordinated notes due February 2016. The $246 million of net proceeds from this debt issuance was used to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under our bank credit facility.

During 2005, we redeemed the entire $200 million principal amount of our 9.25% senior notes originally due in 2009 for approximately $209 million, funded by availability under our bank credit facility.

In 2004, we issued $350 million principal amount of 6.75% senior subordinated notes due April 2014. Our net proceeds from the issuance of these notes were approximately $345 million, from which we repaid approximately $296 million of outstanding indebtedness under our bank credit facility. We used approximately $49 million of the net proceeds from this issuance to pay for a portion of the Shreveport acquisition.

We began paying quarterly dividends in 2003. Dividends are declared at the discretion of our Board of Directors. We are subject to certain limitations regarding the payment of dividends, such as restricted payment limitations related to our outstanding notes and our bank credit facility.

Other Items Affecting Liquidity

Development Projects

Echelon Place. In January 2006, we announced plans to develop Echelon Place on the Las Vegas Strip. We expect to commence construction in the second quarter 2007, with a planned third quarter 2010 opening. We recently completed the schematic design phase of the project and have increased the budget for the wholly-owned components of Echelon Place to $3.3 billion, principally as a result of additional scope, larger guest rooms and suites, and increased estimated construction costs. We continue to perform design and development work on the two joint-venture elements of Echelon Place, which include a retail promenade and our hotel joint venture with Morgans Hotel Group LLC, or Morgans.

Echelon Place will include a total of approximately 5,000 rooms in five unique hotels, including the following amenities:

  • Casino space: 140,000 square feet
  • Entertainment venues: 4,000-seat and 1,500-seat theaters, operated by AEG Live
  • Retail promenade: 300,000 square feet
  • Meeting and Convention space: 750,000 square feet
  • Parking: approximately 9,000 spaces

Echelon Place will also include approximately 30 dining, nightlife and beverage venues in addition to an approximately 4.5 acre multi-level pool and recreation deck.

On February 27, 2007, we exchanged the Barbary Coast for 24 acres, which will bring our total land holdings to 87 contiguous acres on the Echelon Place site. The additional land allowed us to modify the site layout of Echelon Place, increases the overall size of the project to 65 acres and will provide us with two additional parcels of six and 16 acres that could allow for the addition of another distinct hotel, a residential component, and additional retail, dining, meeting and casino space.

In connection with our joint venture with Morgans to develop, construct and operate the Delano Las Vegas and the Mondrian Las Vegas hotels, we will contribute approximately 6.1 acres of land and Morgans will contribute $91.5 million to the venture, and the venture will arrange non-recourse project financing. Morgans is expected to begin construction in the first quarter 2008.

Blue Chip. In October 2006, we announced a $130 million expansion project at Blue Chip that will add a second hotel with approximately 300 guest rooms to our existing 184-room hotel, a spa and fitness center, additional meeting and event space as well as more dining and nightlife experiences. We expect to begin construction on the project during the first quarter 2007 and it is expected to open in late 2008.

Other Opportunities

We regularly investigate and pursue additional expansion opportunities in markets where casino gaming is currently permitted. We also pursue expansion opportunities in jurisdictions where casino gaming is not currently permitted in order to be prepared to develop projects upon approval of casino gaming. Such expansions will be affected and determined by several key factors, including:

  • outcome of license selection processes;
  • approval of gaming in jurisdictions where we have been active but where casino gaming is not currently permitted;
  • identification of additional suitable investment opportunities in current gaming jurisdictions; and
  • availability of acceptable financing.

Additional projects may require us to make substantial investments or may cause us to incur substantial costs related to the investigation and pursuit of such opportunities, which investments and costs we may fund through cash flow from operations or availability under our bank credit facility. To the extent such sources of funds are not sufficient, we may also seek to raise such additional funds through public or private equity or debt financings or from other sources. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available or that, if available, such financing will be obtainable on terms favorable to us.

Acquisition of Dania Jai Alai. On June 5, 2006, we entered into a purchase agreement to acquire Dania Jai Alai and approximately 47 acres of related land located in Dania Beach, Florida. Dania Jai Alai is one of four pari-mutuel facilities approved under Florida law to operate 1,500 Class III slot machines. We expect to finance the acquisition through availability under our bank credit facility.

On August 8, 2006, a three-judge panel of the First District Court of Appeals in Broward County, Florida overturned a lower court decision which in turn could lead to the invalidation of a November 2004 initiative approved by Florida voters to operate slot machines at certain pari-mutuel gaming facilities in Broward County. This decision was essentially reaffirmed by the First District Court of Appeals on November 30, 2006, with two questions being certified to the Florida Supreme Court. If the initiative is invalidated, we may not be able to operate slot machines at the Dania Jai Alai facility, which would materially affect any potential cash flow and revenue expected from the Dania Jai Alai facility. See Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors-We face risks associated with growth and acquisitions."

In February 2007, we received our slot license for our acquisition of Dania Jai Alai. We also modified our agreement to purchase this operation. Under the revised agreement, we are required to pay an aggregate of $77.5 million at closing of this transaction, and we will be required to pay an additional $75 million in March 2010, or earlier, if certain conditions are satisfied. We will not record a liability for the additional $75 million obligation until the contingency has been resolved and the consideration is distributable. At that time, the $75 million payment will be added to the cost of the acquisition. We closed the transaction on March 1, 2007 and we plan to begin construction in the second half of 2007 with a grand opening of the casino operation around the end of 2008.

North Las Vegas Locals Casino. In February 2006, we purchased a 40-acre parcel in North Las Vegas for approximately $35 million for the development of a Las Vegas locals casino. We plan on developing a full-service casino hotel on this site; however, we do not anticipate beginning construction in mid-2007 as previously contemplated, as we are continuing to evaluate the development of infrastructure improvements and the pace of population growth in the area.

We can provide no assurances that our expansion and development projects will be completed within our current estimates, commence operations as expected, include all of the anticipated amenities, features or facilities or achieve market acceptance. In addition, our development projects are subject to those additional risks inherent in the development and operation of a new or expanded business enterprise, including potential unanticipated operating problems. Also see Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors - "Our expansion, development and renovation projects may face significant risks inherent in construction projects or implementing a new marketing strategy, including receipt of necessary government approvals". If our expansion or development projects do not become operational within the time frame and project costs currently contemplated or do not successfully compete in their markets, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Once our projects become operational, they will face many of the same risks that our current properties face including, but not limited to, increases in taxes due to changes in legislation.

The source of funds for these projects is expected to come from cash flows from operations and availability under our bank credit facility, to the extent availability exists after we meet our working capital needs. We could also fund these projects with incremental bank financing, additional debt or equity offerings. Additional financing may not be available to us, or, if available, may not be on terms favorable to us.

Barbary Coast Exchange . On February 27, 2007, we completed the transaction to exchange the Barbary Coast for 24 acres of land adjacent to our Echelon Place development project on the Las Vegas Strip, and we expect to record a non-cash, pre-tax gain of approximately $280 million during the quarter ending March 31, 2007. The additional land has allowed us to modify the site layout of Echelon Place and increased the overall size of the project to 65 acres.

Indebtedness

Our long-term debt primarily consists of a bank credit facility and senior subordinated notes. We pay variable rate interest based on LIBOR on our bank credit facility, the revolving portion of which matures in June 2010 and the term loan portion of which matures in June 2011. At December 31, 2006, we had availability under our bank credit facility of $859 million. We pay fixed rates of interest ranging from 6.75% to 8.75% on our senior subordinated notes.

On January 30, 2006, we issued $250 million principal amount of 7.125% senior subordinated notes due February 2016. The net proceeds of this debt issuance were approximately $246 million which was used to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the revolving portion of our bank credit facility.

Bank Credit Facility Covenants. Our bank credit facility contains certain financial and other covenants, including, without limitation, various covenants (i) requiring the maintenance of a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, (ii) establishing a maximum permitted total leverage ratio and senior leverage ratio, (iii) imposing limitations of the incurrence of additional secured indebtedness and (iv) imposing restrictions on investments, dividends and certain other payments. We believe we are in compliance with the bank credit facility covenants at December 31, 2006.

Notes. Our $250 million, $300 million, $350 million and $250 million principal amounts of senior subordinated notes due 2012, 2012, 2014, and 2016, respectively, contain limitations on, among other things, (i) our ability and our restricted subsidiaries' (as defined in the indentures governing the notes) ability to incur additional indebtedness, (ii) the payment of dividends and other distributions with respect to our capital stock and of our restricted subsidiaries and the purchase, redemption or retirement of our capital stock and our restricted subsidiaries, (iii) the making of certain investments, (iv) asset sales, (v) the incurrence of liens, (vi) transactions with affiliates, (vii) payment restrictions affecting restricted subsidiaries, and (viii) certain consolidations, mergers and transfers of assets. We believe we are in compliance with the covenants related to notes outstanding at December 31, 2006.

Our ability to service our debt will be dependent on future performance, which will be affected by, among other things, prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, certain of which are beyond our control. It is unlikely that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations to enable us to pay our indebtedness as it matures and to fund our other liquidity needs. We believe that we will need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness at each maturity.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments.  The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2006.


                                                                           Payments Due by Period
                                               -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                   Total        2007        2008        2009        2010        2011      Thereafter
---------------------------------------------  ----------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ----------  
Contractual obligations
    Long-term debt obligations                $2,137,460   $   5,550   $   5,582   $   5,616   $ 491,452   $ 468,190   $1,161,070
    Capital lease obligations                         --          --          --          --          --          --           --
    Operating lease obligations                  542,082      17,285      15,649      13,598      11,762      11,226      472,562
    Interest obligations on fixed rate debt (1)  593,429      87,356      87,324      87,290      87,254      87,216      156,989
    Purchase obligations:
        Entertainment contracts                    4,852       4,852          --          --          --          --           --
        Construction projects (2)                  4,984       3,686         500         461         337          --           --
        Other (3)                                125,391      52,868      34,915      34,002       3,146         230          230
    Other long-term contracts (4)                 10,624         659         681         625         485         257        7,917
                                               ----------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ----------
        Total contractual obligations         $3,418,822   $ 172,256   $ 144,651   $ 141,592   $ 594,436   $ 567,119   $1,798,768
                                               ==========   =========   =========   =========   =========   =========   ==========

(1) Includes interest rate obligations on our fixed rate debt that comprises $1.2 billion of our total December 31, 2006 debt balance of $2.1 billion. Our variable rate debt at December 31, 2006 consists of $1.0 billion in outstanding balances on our bank credit facility. Interest payments for future periods related to the variable rate debt are dependent upon certain items including future eurodollar rates and the outstanding borrowings under the bank credit facility, that fluctuate from period to period and have not been presented in this table. At December 31, 2006, the blended interest rate for outstanding borrowings under the bank credit facility was 6.8%.

(2) Construction projects consist primarily of purchase obligations related to the Echelon Place development project.

(3) Other consists of various contracts for goods and services, including our contract for Hawaiian air charter operations.

(4) Other long-term obligations relate primarily to deferred compensation balances at December 31, 2006.

Certain of our executive officers participate in a long-term management incentive plan (the "Plan"), which currently extends through December 31, 2009. Certain components of the Plan cannot be measured until the end of the performance period, as they will not be known until the end of the performance period. As such, we do not accrue for these items over the life of the Plan, but rather accrue for that portion of the Plan when it becomes measureable. Estimated possible future maximum payouts are $2.2 million in 2007, $5.2 million in 2008 and $5.2 million in 2009.

In 2006, we entered into a 50/50 joint venture agreement with Morgans as part of the development for Echelon Place. In conjunction with this joint venture agreement, we expect to contribute approximately 6.1 acres of land and Morgans will contribute approximately $91.5 million to the venture, and that the venture will arrange non-recourse project financing to develop two hotel properties, the Delano Las Vegas and the Mondrian Las Vegas.

We are required to pay to the City of Kenner, Louisiana, a boarding fee of $2.50 for each passenger boarding our Treasure Chest riverboat casino during the year. The future minimum payment due in 2007 to the City of Kenner, based upon a portion of actual passenger counts from the prior year, is approximately $2.8 million.

In 2005, the Illinois legislature passed new legislation for wagering taxes that imposes a minimum wagering tax for casinos for the next two state-based fiscal years ending June 30, 2007. Under these minimum wagering tax provisions, during each of the State's fiscal years ending June 30, 2006 and 2007, Par-A-Dice will be required to remit to the State the amount, if any, by which $43 million exceeds the wagering taxes actually paid by Par-A-Dice during each of those fiscal years. The payments, if any, are required by each of June 15, 2006 and 2007. Par-A-Dice paid $6.2 million for Illinois State wagering taxes on June 15, 2006. Effective July 1, 2005, we incorporated this minimum payment provision into the effective gaming tax rate for Par-A-Dice. In addition, Par-A-Dice paid $6.7 million on June 15, 2006 for a retroactive Illinois gaming tax assessment, which was the result of a 2006 modification by the Illinois State Legislature requiring licensees to pay an additional 5% tax on adjusted gross gaming revenues retroactive to July 1, 2005.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements . Our off balance sheet arrangements mainly consist of investments in unconsolidated affiliates, which is primarily our investment in Borgata. We have not entered into any transactions with special purpose entities, nor have we engaged in any derivative transactions other than straightforward interest rate swaps and collars. Our joint venture investments allow us to realize the benefits of owning a full-scale resort in a manner that lessens our initial investment. We do not guarantee financing obtained by Borgata nor are there any other provisions of the venture agreements which are unusual or subject us to risks to which we would not be subjected if we had full ownership of the respective properties.

We have entered into certain agreements that contain indemnification provisions such as indemnification agreements with our executive officers and directors and provide indemnity insurance pursuant to which directors and officers are indemnified or insured against liability or loss under certain circumstances which may include liability or related loss under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. In addition, our Restated Articles of Incorporation and Restated Bylaws contain provisions that provide for indemnification of our directors, officers, employees and other agents to the maximum extent permitted by law.

At December 31, 2006, we had outstanding letters of credit totaling $5.2 million.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities". SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The fair value option established by SFAS No. 159 permits all companies to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. At each subsequent reporting date, a company shall report in earnings any unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of a company's first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, provided the company also elects to apply the provisions of SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" (see below). We are currently evaluating whether to adopt the fair value option under this SFAS No. 150 and evaluating what impact such adoption would have on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 158. "Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)". SFAS No. 158 requires employers to recognize the over-funded or under-funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through other comprehensive income. This Statement also requires employers to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year end and is effective for publicly traded companies as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 31, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements as we do not currently have a defined benefit postretirement plan that meets the criteria specified under SFAS No. 158.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" , which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 ("SAB No. 108"), which adds Section N to Topic 1, "Financial Statements". Section N provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. To provide full disclosure, registrants electing not to restate prior periods should reflect the effects of initially applying the guidance in Topic 1N in their financial statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. The adoption of SAB No. 108 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 ("FIN 48"), "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109". FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and applies to all tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. We do not expect the adoption of FIN 48 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-3 ("EITF 06-3"), " Disclosure Requirements for Taxes Assessed by a Governmental Authority on Revenue-Producing Transactions ." The consensus allows companies to choose between two acceptable alternatives based on their accounting policies for transactions in which the company collects taxes on behalf of a governmental authority, such as sales taxes. Under the gross method, taxes collected are accounted for as a component of sales revenue with an offsetting expense. Conversely, the net method allows a reduction to sales revenue. If such taxes are reported gross and are significant, companies should disclose the amount of those taxes. The guidance should be applied to financial reports through retrospective application for all periods presented, if amounts are significant, for interim and annual reporting beginning February 1, 2007. We have historically presented sales net of tax collected and we do not intend to change our policy; therefore, we do not expect the adoption of EITF 06-3 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140" . SFAS No. 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to irrevocably account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after December 31, 2006. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 155 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements, as we do not currently have any financial instruments that meet the criteria specified under SFAS No. 155.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As such, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts included in our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from the estimates. We believe the following critical accounting policies may require a higher degree of judgment and complexity.

Goodwill, Intangible and Other Long-Lived Assets. We evaluate our goodwill, intangible and other long-lived assets in accordance with the applications of SFAS No. 142 related to goodwill and other intangible assets and SFAS No. 144 related to impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. For goodwill and intangible assets, we review the carrying values on an annual basis and between annual dates in certain circumstances. For assets to be disposed of, we recognize the asset at the lower of carrying value or fair market value less costs of disposal, as estimated based on comparable asset sales, solicited offers, or a discounted cash flow model. For assets to be held and used, we review for impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist.

Inherent in the reviews of the carrying amounts of the above assets are various estimates. First, management must determine the usage of the asset. To the extent management decides that an asset will be sold or disposed of, it is more likely that an impairment may be recognized. Assets must be tested at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist. This means that some assets must be grouped, and management has some discretion in the grouping of assets. Future cash flow estimates are, by their nature, subjective and actual results may differ materially from our estimates. If our ongoing estimates of future cash flows are not met, we may have to record additional impairment charges in future accounting periods. Our estimates of cash flows are based on the current regulatory, social and economic climates, recent operating information and budgets of the various properties where we conduct operations. These estimates could be negatively impacted by changes in federal, state or local regulations, economic downturns, or other events affecting various forms of travel and access to our properties.

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we have tested the assets of Sam's Town Tunica for recoverability during 2006 due to a history of operating losses. As the property's estimated undiscounted future cash flows exceed its carrying value, we do not believe these assets to be impaired at this time; however, we will continue to monitor the performance of Sam's Town Tunica as well as continue to update our asset recoverability test under SFAS No. 144. If future asset recoverability tests indicate that the assets of Sam's Town Tunica are impaired, we will be subject to a non-cash write-down of its assets which would likely have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

On July 25, 2006, we entered into a Unit Purchase Agreement, as amended, (the "Agreement") to sell South Coast to Michael J. Gaughan for a total purchase price of approximately $513 million. In connection with entering into the Agreement, we met all of the criteria required to classify certain of the assets and liabilities of South Coast as held for sale on our consolidated balance sheets. As such, we ceased depreciation of those assets and they were measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. This resulted in an estimated non-cash, pretax impairment charge of $65 million in September 2006, as the fair value of the assets were less than their carrying value at that time.

We recorded a $28 million non-cash charge related to the write-off of the net book value of the original Blue Chip gaming vessel in June 2006, which was replaced with a new gaming vessel in conjunction with our expansion project. After analysis of alternative uses for the original vessel, management decided in June 2006 to permanently retire the asset from further operations.

We recorded a $3.0 million asset write-down during the year ended December 31, 2006 related to land held for sale in Pennsylvania that we previously planned to utilize as a site for a gaming operation. In September 2006, we withdrew our application for gaming approval, which led to our decision to sell the land.

We determined that the impact of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita was a triggering event requiring impairment tests for Treasure Chest and Delta Downs' assets during 2005. Our impairment tests were based upon estimated future cash flows from these properties. Based upon the results of the tests, no impairment was indicated for any of the assets tested.

Because we intend to redevelop the land on which Stardust is located and our plans include demolishing Stardust's existing buildings and abandoning other related assets, we performed an impairment test for this property. Based upon the results of this test, we recorded a $56 million non-cash impairment loss in 2005 to write down the long-lived assets of the Stardust to their estimated fair value.

Capital Expenditures and Depreciation.  We must also make estimates and assumptions when accounting for capital expenditures. Whether an expenditure is considered a maintenance expense or a capital asset is a matter of judgment. Our depreciation expense is highly dependent upon the assumptions we make about our assets' estimated useful lives. We determine the estimated useful lives based upon our experience with similar assets. Whenever events or circumstances occur which change the estimated useful life of an asset, we account for the change prospectively. In connection with the closure and demolition of Stardust, we reevaluated the estimated useful lives of the depreciable assets residing on the land associated with our Echelon Place development project, including our corporate office building, and recorded $11.2 million of accelerated depreciation expense in 2006.

Capitalized Interest . We capitalize interest costs associated with major construction projects as part of the cost of the constructed assets. When no debt is incurred specifically for a project, interest is capitalized on amounts expended for the project using our weighted average cost of borrowing. Capitalization of interest ceases when the project or discernible portions of the project are complete. We amortize capitalized interest over the estimated useful life of the related asset.

Derivative Instruments.  We utilize an investment policy for managing risks associated with our current and anticipated future borrowings, such as interest rate risk and its potential impact on our fixed and variable rate debt. Under this policy, we may utilize derivative contracts that effectively convert our borrowings from either floating rate to fixed or fixed rate to floating. The policy does not allow for the use of derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. To the extent we employ such financial instruments pursuant to this policy, and the instruments qualify for hedge accounting, we designate and account for them as hedged instruments. In order to qualify for hedge accounting, the underlying hedged item must expose us to risks associated with market fluctuations and the financial instrument used must be designated as a hedge and must reduce our exposure to market fluctuations throughout the hedged period. If these criteria are not met, a change in the market value of the financial instrument is recognized as a gain or loss in the period of change. Otherwise, gains and losses are not recognized except to the extent that the hedged debt is disposed of prior to maturity or to the extent that acceptable ranges of ineffectiveness exist in the hedge. Net interest paid or received pursuant to the financial instrument is included in interest expense in the period.

At December 31, 2006, we had ten derivative instruments outstanding with a total notional amount of $550 million. One of these derivative instruments is a fixed-to-floating swap with a $50 million notional amount that meets the criteria for fair value hedge accounting established by SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 138, as well as the criteria for the "shortcut" method, which allows for an assumption of no ineffectiveness. As such, there was no net impact on our consolidated statement of operations from changes in value of the hedging instrument. Instead, the fair value of the instrument is recorded as either an asset or liability on our consolidated balance sheets with offsetting adjustments to the carrying values of the related debt. As such, at December 31, 2006 and 2005, we recorded a long-term asset of $1.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively, on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, representing the fair market value of the swap at that date. The corresponding net adjustment increased the carrying value of the long-term debt items hedged, as the interest rate swap is considered highly effective under the criteria established by GAAP.

At December 31, 2006, we also had four floating-to-fixed derivative instruments and two interest rate collars with an aggregate notional amount of $300 million designated as cash flow hedges. On a quarterly basis, we monitor the effectiveness of these derivatives and record any ineffectiveness in our consolidated statements of operations. Our derivative instruments are recorded on our consolidated balance sheets at their fair value. For the six contracts discussed, we recorded a non-current asset of $6.6 million and $6.1 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

In September 2006, we entered into three floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps with a forward start date of June 30, 2008, with a combined notional amount of $200 million. We determined that these derivative instruments did not meet the requirements to qualify for hedge accounting and have therefore recorded a $1.8 million charge for the change in fair value of these derivative instruments in our consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Stock-Based Employee Compensation. On January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective method and as such, results for prior periods have not been restated. This statement requires us to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). This cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. Under the modified prospective method, we expense the cost of share-based compensation awards issued after January 1, 2006. Additionally, we recognize compensation cost for the portion of awards outstanding on January 1, 2006 for which the requisite service has not been rendered over the period the requisite service is being rendered after January 1, 2006. Compensation expense related to stock option awards is calculated based on the fair value of each major option grant on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model that requires the formation of assumptions to be used in the model, such as expected stock volatility, risk-free interest rates, expected option lives and dividend yields. We formed our assumptions using historical experience and observable conditions.

Income Taxes.  We are subject to income taxes in the United States and several states in which we operate. We account for income taxes according to SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes . SFAS No. 109 requires the recognition of deferred tax assets, net of applicable reserves, related to net operating loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards and certain temporary differences. A valuation allowance is recognized if, based upon the weight of the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be recognized.

Our income tax returns are subject to examination by tax authorities. We regularly assess the potential outcome of these examinations in determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and our income tax liabilities. To determine necessary reserves, we must make assumptions and judgments about potential actions by taxing authorities, partially based on past experiences. Our estimate of the potential outcome for any uncertain tax issue is highly judgmental, and we believe we have adequately provided for any reasonable and foreseeable outcomes relating to uncertain tax matters. When actual results of tax examinations differ from our estimates or when potential actions are settled differently than we expected, we adjust the income tax provision and our tax reserves in the current period.

Self-Insurance Reserves. We are self-insured up to certain stop loss amounts for employee heath coverage, workers' compensation and general liability costs. Insurance claims and reserves include accruals of estimated settlements for known claims, as well as accruals of estimates for claims incurred but not yet reported. In estimating these accruals, we consider historical loss experience and make judgments about the expected levels of costs per claim. We believe our estimates of future liability are reasonable based upon our methodology; however, changes in health care costs, accident frequency and severity and other factors could materially affect the estimate for these liabilities.

Litigation, Claims and Assessments. We also utilize estimates for litigation, claims and assessments related to our business and tax matters. These estimates are based upon our knowledge and experience about past and current events and also upon reasonable assumptions about future events. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk, specifically long-term U.S. treasury rates and the applicable spreads in the high-yield investment market and short-term and long-term eurodollar rates, and its potential impact on our long-term debt. We attempt to limit our exposure to interest rate risk by managing the mix of our long-term fixed-rate borrowings and short-term borrowings under our bank credit facility. Borrowings under our bank credit facility are based upon the agent bank's quoted base rate or the eurodollar rate, plus applicable margins; however, the amount of outstanding borrowings is expected to fluctuate from time to time. We also attempt to manage the impact of interest rate risk on our long-term debt by utilizing derivative financial instruments in accordance with established policies and procedures. We do not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. For more information, see Note 7, " Derivative Instruments " in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, we utilized interest rate swap agreements. Interest differentials resulting from these agreements are recorded on an accrual basis as an adjustment to interest expense. Interest rate swaps related to debt are matched to specific debt obligations.

We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the interest rate swap agreements outstanding at December 31, 2006; however, we believe that this risk is minimized because we monitor the credit ratings of the counterparties to the swaps. If we had terminated our swaps as of December 31, 2006, we would have been entitled to receive a net total of $5.9 million based on the fair values of the derivative instruments.

The following table provides information about our derivative instruments and other financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates, including interest swaps and debt obligations. For our debt obligations, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates. For our interest rate swaps, the table presents the notional amounts and weighted average interest rates by the expected (contractual) maturity dates. The notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual cash flows to be exchanged under the contracts. The weighted average variable rates are based upon prevailing interest rates.

The scheduled maturities of our long-term debt and interest rate swap agreements outstanding as of December 31, 2006 for the years ending December 31 are as follows:


                                                                     Year Ending December 31,
                                            -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands)                               2007      2008      2009       2010        2011      Thereafter     Total
------------------------------------------  -------   -------   -------   ---------   ---------   ----------   ---------- 
Liabilities
Long-term debt (including current portion):
    Fixed-rate                             $   550   $   582   $   616   $     652   $     690   $1,161,070   $1,164,160
    Average interest rate                      5.7 %     5.7 %     5.7 %       5.7 %       5.7 %        7.5 %        7.5 %
    Variable-rate                          $ 5,000   $ 5,000   $ 5,000   $ 490,800   $ 467,500   $            $  973,300
    Average interest rate                      6.9 %     6.9 %     6.9 %       6.8 %       6.9 %         -- %        6.9 %
Interest rate derivatives
Derivative Instruments:
    Pay floating                                --        --        --          --          --   $   50,000   $   50,000
        Average receivable rate                 --        --        --          --          --          8.8 %        8.8 %
        Average est. payable rate               --        --        --          --          --          7.9 %        7.9 %
    Pay fixed                                   --        --        --   $ 200,000     200,000           --   $  400,000
        Average receivable rate                 --        --        --         5.4 %        --           --          5.4 %
        Average payable rate                    --        --        --         4.1 %       5.3 %         --          4.7 %
    Collars                                     --        --        --   $ 100,000          --           --   $  100,000
        Cap rate                                --        --        --         5.3 %        --           --          5.3 %
        Floor rate                              --        --        --         3.5 %        --           --          3.5 %

 

The following table provides other information about our long-term debt at December 31, 2006:



                                                                             Outstanding     Carrying     Estimated
(In thousands)                                                               Face Amount      Value       Fair Value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Bank credit facility                                                        $    973,300  $    973,300  $    973,300
8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2012                                         250,000       251,106       262,500
7.75% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2012                                         300,000       300,000       310,500
6.75% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2014                                         350,000       350,000       347,375
7.125% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2016                                        250,000       250,000       248,125
Other                                                                             14,160        14,160        14,160
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Total                                                                       $  2,137,460  $  2,138,566  $  2,155,960
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The information required by this item is contained in the financial statements listed in Item 15(a) of this Form 10-K under the caption "Financial Statements." In addition, audited consolidated financial statements for Marina District Development Company, LLC, d.b.a. Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa, our 50% Atlantic City joint venture, as of and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 are included in Exhibit 99.2 and are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosures during the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006.

ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Based on the evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we include a report of management's assessment of the design and effectiveness of our internal controls as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. Our independent registered public accounting firm also attested to, and reported on, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Management's report and the independent registered public accounting firm's attestation report are located below.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the most recent fiscal year, December 31, 2006, based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our assessment under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework , our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of our most recent fiscal year, December 31, 2006.

Our management's assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which is included below.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Management's Assessment on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Boyd Gaming Corporation and Subsidiaries:

We have audited management's assessment, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Boyd Gaming Corporation and Subsidiaries (the "Company") maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, of the Company, and our report dated February 28, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment .

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
February 28, 2007

 

ITEM 9B. Other Information

None.

Part III

ITEM 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

Information regarding the members of our board of directors and our audit committee, including our audit committee financial expert, is set forth under the captions "Board Committees - Audit Committee", "Director Nominees", and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding non-director executive company officers is set forth in Item 4A of Part I of this Report on Form 10-K.

Code of Ethics.  We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics ("code of ethics") that applies to each of our directors, officers and employees. Our code of ethics is posted on our website at www.boydgaming.com. Any waivers or amendments to our code of ethics will be posted on our website.

ITEM 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is set forth under the captions "Executive Officer and Director Compensation", "Compensation and Stock Option Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation", and "Compensation and Stock Option Committee Report" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this item is set forth under the caption "Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" and "Equity Compensation Plan Information" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information required by this item is set forth under the captions "Related Party Transactions" and "Director Independence" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Information about principal accounting fees and services, as well as the audit committee's pre-approval policies appears under the caption "Audit and Non-Audit Fees" and "Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

Part IV

ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

   

Page No. 

(a)

Financial Statements.  The following financial statements for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 are filed as part of this report:

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

41

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2006 and 2005

42

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2006

43

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2006

45

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2006

46

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

48

 

Audited consolidated financial statements for Marina District Development Company, LLC, d.b.a. Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa, as of and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 are presented in Exhibit 99.2 and are incorporated herein by reference

 

(b)

Exhibits.  Refer to (c) on page 80.

 

 

Boyd Gaming Corporation and Subsidiaries

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

Page No. 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

41

Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

42

Consolidated Statements of Operations

43

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

45

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

46

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

48

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Boyd Gaming Corporation and Subsidiaries:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Boyd Gaming Corporation and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Boyd Gaming Corporation and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2005, the Company changed its method of accounting for intangible assets to conform to EITF D-108, Use of the Residual Method to Value Acquired Assets Other Than Goodwill , and recorded a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2006, the Company changed their method of accounting for share-based compensation to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment .

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 28, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on management's assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
February 28, 2007

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets


                                                                                            December 31,
                                                                                   ------------------------------
(In thousands, except share data)                                                       2006            2005
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------  --------------  --------------
                                     ASSETS
Current assets
    Cash and cash equivalents                                                     $      169,397  $      188,406
    Restricted cash                                                                       12,604           8,412
    Accounts receivable, net                                                              26,275          24,707
    Insurance receivable                                                                      --           4,313
    Inventories                                                                           11,037          11,705
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                             42,417          36,408
    Assets held for sale, net of cash                                                    102,977         531,933
    Income taxes receivable                                                                8,286           7,002
    Deferred income taxes                                                                  1,685           2,683
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
            Total current assets                                                         374,678         815,569
Property and equipment, net                                                            2,129,445       2,100,276
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated subsidiaries, net                          385,751         389,492
Assets held for sale                                                                          --         107,101
Other assets, net                                                                        100,469         101,471
Intangible assets, net                                                                   506,750         506,838
Goodwill, net                                                                            404,206         404,206
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
            Total assets                                                          $    3,901,299  $    4,424,953
                                                                                   ==============  ==============
                      LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
    Current maturities of long-term debt                                          $        5,550  $        5,729
    Accounts payable                                                                      77,532          92,537
    Construction payables                                                                 23,516         128,136
    Accrued liabilities
        Payroll and related                                                               72,162          77,390
        Interest                                                                          20,620          15,762
        Gaming                                                                            64,085          60,468
        Accrued expenses and other                                                        65,532          55,861
        Liabilities related to assets held for sale                                        2,993           3,925
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
            Total current liabilities                                                    331,990         439,808
Long-term debt, net of current maturities                                              2,133,016       2,552,795
Deferred income taxes                                                                    301,639         316,517
Other liabilities                                                                         24,702          17,829
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Stockholders' equity
    Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized                              --              --
    Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 87,105,106
        and 89,286,491 shares outstanding                                                    871             893
    Additional paid-in capital                                                           561,298         619,852
    Retained earnings                                                                    544,080         473,964
    Accumulated other comprehensive income, net                                            3,703           3,295
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
            Total stockholders' equity                                                 1,109,952       1,098,004
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
            Total liabilities and stockholders' equity                            $    3,901,299  $    4,424,953
                                                                                   ==============  ==============

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations



                                                                                       Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share data)                                            2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Revenues
    Gaming                                                                  $  1,811,716  $  1,772,053  $  1,435,445
    Food and beverage                                                            304,864       311,119       241,495
    Room                                                                         172,781       172,617       120,215
    Other                                                                        145,560       146,140       104,928
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Gross revenues                                                                 2,434,921     2,401,929     1,902,083
Less promotional allowances                                                      242,287       240,844       194,876
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
        Net revenues                                                           2,192,634     2,161,085     1,707,207

Costs and expenses
    Gaming                                                                       836,675       783,863       678,677
    Food and beverage                                                            187,908       193,961       147,824
    Room                                                                          55,052        51,012        36,221
    Other                                                                        110,106       128,028        98,900
    Selling, general and administrative                                          311,551       313,410       273,356
    Maintenance and utilities                                                    100,659        94,072        75,295
    Depreciation and amortization                                                188,539       170,660       134,104
    Corporate expense                                                             54,229        44,101        33,338
    Preopening expenses                                                           20,623         7,690         1,953
    Write-downs and other charges, net                                             8,838        64,615         1,225
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
        Total costs and expenses                                               1,874,180     1,851,412     1,480,893
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Operating income from Borgata                                                     86,196        96,014        77,965
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Operating income                                                                 404,650       405,687       304,279
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Other income (expense)
    Interest income                                                                  112           224           186
    Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized                                (145,545)     (126,312)     (100,728)
    Decrease in value of derivative instruments                                   (1,801)           --            --
    Loss on early retirements of debt                                                 --       (17,529)       (4,344)
    Other non-operating expenses from Borgata, net                               (10,577)      (11,718)      (12,554)
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
        Total                                                                   (157,811)     (155,335)     (117,440)
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes
    and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle                    246,839       250,352       186,839
Provision for income taxes                                                       (85,491)      (85,984)      (75,553)
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect
    of a change in accounting principle                                          161,348       164,368       111,286

Discontinued operations:
    Income (loss) from discontinued operations (including a $68,606
      loss on disposition in 2006)                                               (69,219)       (5,253)          260
    Benefit from (provision for) income taxes                                     24,649         1,934           (92)
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
       Net income (loss) from discontinued operations                            (44,570)       (3,319)          168

Income before cumulative effect of a change in
    accounting principle                                                         116,778       161,049       111,454

Cumulative effect of a change in accounting for
    intangible assets, net of taxes of $8,984                                         --       (16,439)           --
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Net income                                                                  $    116,778  $    144,610  $    111,454
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations - continued

 



                                                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
                                                                                 2006          2005          2004
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Basic net income per common share:
    Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect
        of a change in accounting principle                                 $       1.83  $       1.86  $       1.45
    Net income (loss) from discontinued operations                                 (0.51)        (0.04)         0.01
    Cumulative effect of a change in accounting for
        intangible assets, net of taxes                                               --         (0.19)           --
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
    Net income                                                              $       1.32  $       1.63  $       1.46
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

Weighted average basic shares outstanding                                         88,380        88,528        76,586
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

Diluted net income per common share:
    Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect
        of a change in accounting principle                                 $       1.80  $       1.82  $       1.42
    Net loss from discontinued operations                                          (0.50)        (0.04)           --
    Cumulative effect of a change in accounting for
        intangible assets, net of taxes                                               --         (0.18)           --
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
    Net income                                                              $       1.30  $       1.60  $       1.42
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding                                       89,593        90,507        78,235
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

Dividends declared per common share                                         $       0.53  $       0.46  $       0.32
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity


                                                                                                            Accumulated
                                                                                                               Other
                                                  Other           Common Stock      Additional             Comprehensive      Total
                                              Comprehensive  ---------------------   Paid-In    Retained   Income (Loss),  Stockholders'
(In thousands, except share data)                Income        Shares      Amount    Capital    Earnings        Net           Equity
--------------------------------------------  -------------  -----------  --------  ----------  ---------  --------------  ------------ 

Balances, January 1, 2004                                    64,980,970  $    650  $  162,123  $ 283,352  $       (4,872) $    441,253
Net income                                   $     111,454           --        --          --    111,454              --       111,454
Derivative instruments market adjustment,
    net of taxes of $1.7 million                     2,988           --        --          --         --           2,988         2,988
Restricted available for sale securities
    market adjustment, net of taxes                    (33)          --        --          --         --             (33)          (33)
                                              -------------
Comprehensive income                         $     114,409
                                              -------------
Stock issued in connection with merger with Coast
    Casinos, net of issuance costs of $425                   19,369,869       194     368,958         --              --       369,152
Stock options exercised, including
    taxes of $20.7 million                                    3,186,283        31      43,642         --              --        43,673
Dividends paid on common stock                                       --        --          --    (24,717)             --       (24,717)
                                                            -----------  --------  ----------  ---------  --------------  ------------
Balances, December 31, 2004                                  87,537,122  $    875  $  574,723  $ 370,089  $       (1,917) $    943,770
Net income                                   $     144,610           --        --          --    144,610              --       144,610
Derivative instruments market adjustment,
     net of taxes of $3.2 million                    5,340           --        --          --         --           5,340         5,340
Restricted available for sale securities
    market adjustment, net of taxes                   (128)          --        --          --         --            (128)         (128)
                                              -------------
Comprehensive income                         $     149,822
                                              -------------
Stock options exercised, including
    taxes of $23.1 million                                    1,749,369        18      45,129         --              --        45,147
Dividends paid on common stock                                       --        --          --    (40,735)             --       (40,735)
                                                            -----------  --------  ----------  ---------  --------------  ------------
Balances, December 31, 2005                                  89,286,491  $    893  $  619,852  $ 473,964  $        3,295  $  1,098,004
Net income                                   $     116,778           --        --          --    116,778              --       116,778
Derivative instruments market
    adjustment, net of taxes of $200                   358           --        --          --         --             358           358
Restricted available for sale securities
    market adjustment, net of taxes of $28              50           --        --          --         --              50            50
                                              -------------
Comprehensive income                         $     117,186
                                              -------------
Stock options exercised                                       1,266,116        12      19,498         --              --        19,510
Excess tax benefit from share-based
    compensation arrangements                                        --        --      12,256         --              --        12,256
Stock repurchased and retired                                (3,447,501)      (34)   (111,956)        --              --      (111,990)
Share-based compensation costs                                       --        --      21,648         --              --        21,648
Dividends paid on common stock                                       --        --          --    (46,662)             --       (46,662)
                                                             -----------  --------  ----------  ---------  --------------  ------------
Balances, December 31, 2006                                  87,105,106  $    871  $  561,298  $ 544,080  $        3,703  $  1,109,952
                                                             ===========  ========  ==========  =========  ==============  ============

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows



                                                                                        Year ended December 31,
                                                                              ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                    2006          2005          2004
----------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income                                                                   $    116,778  $    144,610       111,454
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
  operating activities:
    Depreciation and amortization                                                 208,187       174,939       136,126
    Amortization of debt issuance costs                                             4,486         4,784         4,741
    Deferred income taxes                                                         (14,108)      (18,253)       30,630
    Operating and non-operating income from Borgata                               (75,618)      (84,296)      (65,411)
    Distributions of earnings received from Borgata                                82,603        29,338            --
    Share-based compensation expense                                               21,648            --            --
    Change in value of derivative intstruments                                      1,801            --            --
    Asset write-downs                                                             101,592        56,000            --
    Gain from insurance recoveries for property damage                            (33,450)           --            --
    Tax benefit from stock options exercised                                           --        23,148        20,694
    Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation arrangements                 (12,256)           --            --
    Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle                              --        25,423            --
    Loss on early retirements of debt                                                  --        17,529         4,344
    Gain on sales of undeveloped land and certain other assets                         --          (659)      (10,309)
    Non-cash hurricane expenses                                                        --         2,091            --
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
        Restricted cash                                                            (4,192)       (1,011)          954
        Accounts receivable, net                                                     (983)        3,552        (8,313)
        Insurance receivable                                                        4,313           372            --
        Inventories                                                                 3,052        (1,805)       (1,663)
        Prepaid expenses and other                                                 (5,180)       (4,507)       (2,113)
        Other assets                                                                4,237        (8,343)       (2,184)
        Other current liabilities                                                     559        41,290        37,410
        Other liabilities                                                           5,072         6,704         3,137
        Income taxes receivable                                                    10,972         9,002          (458)
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
Net cash provided by operating activities                                         419,513       419,908       259,039
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures                                                             (436,464)     (618,444)     (268,848)
Insurance recoveries for replacement assets                                        34,450         6,000            --
Net proceeds from sale of South Coast                                             401,430            --            --
Net proceeds from sale of undeveloped land and other assets                         3,198         4,001        31,398
Net cash paid for Coast Casinos acquisition                                            --            --      (909,245)
Net cash paid for Shreveport acquisition                                               --            --      (187,220)
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated subsidiaries                         (2,966)           --       (30,807)
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
Net cash used in investing activities                                                (352)     (608,443)   (1,364,722)
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Payments on long-term debt                                                        (16,074)         (684)         (482)
Payments under bank credit facility                                            (1,150,450)     (518,600)     (777,950)
Borrowings under bank credit facility                                             496,950       965,400     1,622,750
Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt                                      246,300            --       344,596
Retirement of long-term debt                                                           --      (209,325)           --
Proceeds from exercise of stock options                                            19,510        21,999        22,979
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation arrangements                      12,256            --            --
Dividends paid on common stock                                                    (46,662)      (40,735)      (24,717)
Other                                                                                  --        (1,837)       (8,983)
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities                              (438,170)      216,218     1,178,193
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents                              (19,009)       27,683        72,510
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year                                      188,406       160,723        88,213
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year                                       $    169,397  $    188,406  $    160,723
                                                                              ============  ============  ============

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - continued



                                                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                                                              ----------------------------------------
                                                                                  2006          2005          2004
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
    Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized                       $    162,332  $    128,234  $     83,929
    Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds                                     63,974        61,171        24,777

SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
    Payables for capital expenditures                                        $     28,326  $    137,524  $     61,355
    Transfer of land from property and equipment, net
      to assets held for sale, net of cash                                         26,188            --            --
    Repurchase of common stock for issuance of note payable                       111,990            --            --
    Cancellation of note payable in connection with
      sale of South Coast                                                         111,990            --            --
    Restricted cash proceeds from maturities of restricted investments              1,450            --            --
    Restricted cash used to purchase restricted investments                         1,783         3,773        11,652
    Restricted cash proceeds from sales of restricted investments                      --         4,539         1,097
    Debt issuance costs                                                                --            --         5,404
    Debt assumed for acquisition of land                                               --            --        15,764

  Merger with Coast Casinos
    Fair value of non-cash assets acquired                                   $         --  $         --  $  1,525,770
    Net cash paid                                                                      --            --      (909,245)
    Less fair value of commn stock issued, net                                         --            --      (369,152)
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
    Liabilities assumed                                                      $         --  $         --  $    247,373
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
  Acquisition of Sam's Town Shreveport
    Fair value of non-cash assets acquired                                   $         --  $         --  $    192,224
    Net cash paid                                                                      --            --      (187,220)
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------
    Liabilities assumed                                                      $         --  $         --  $      5,004
                                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------


 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1. - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Boyd Gaming Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2006, we wholly-owned and operated 16 gaming entertainment facilities located in Nevada, Mississippi, Illinois, Louisiana and Indiana. In addition, we own and operate two travel agencies, a Hawaiian-based insurance company that underwrites travel-related insurance, and an offsite sports book located in Las Vegas. We are also developing Echelon Place on land that we own on the Las Vegas Strip. We are also a 50% partner in a joint venture that owns a limited liability company that operates Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa in Atlantic City, New Jersey, which commenced operations on July 3, 2003. Investments in 50% or less owned subsidiaries over which we have the ability to exercise significant influence, including joint ventures such as Borgata, are accounted for using the equity method. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

In January 2006, we entered into a 50/50 joint venture agreement associated with Echelon Place. See Note 8, " Commitments and Contingencies ," for more information.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at their date of purchase. The carrying value of these investments approximates their fair value due to their short maturities.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists primarily of customer payments related to advanced bookings with our Hawaiian travel agency and amounts on deposit for horse racing purses.

Accounts Receivable, net

Accounts receivable consist primarily of casino, hotel and other receivables, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $4.6 million and $5.5 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based upon our collection experience and the age of the receivables.

Inventories

Inventories consist primarily of food and beverage and retail items and are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out and retail inventory methods.

Restricted Investments

Restricted investments consist primarily of customer payments related to advanced bookings with our Hawaiian travel agency that are invested generally in fixed income bonds. Investments are stated at fair value based on readily determinable market values using the specific identification method. We classify our investments as available-for-sale and record our investments at their fair market values. The unrealized gains or losses, net of income tax effects, of our restricted available-for-sale investments are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (losses). See Note 2, " Restricted Investments ," for more information.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets or, for leasehold improvements, over the shorter of the asset's useful life or life of the lease. Gains or losses on disposal of assets are recognized as incurred. Costs of major improvements are capitalized, while costs of normal repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred.

Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate our long-lived assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, or SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets . For assets to be disposed of, we recognize the asset at the lower of carrying value or fair market value less costs of disposal, as estimated based on comparable asset sales, solicited offers, or a discounted cash flow model. For assets to be held and used, we review for impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist. We then compare the estimated future cash flows of the asset, on an undiscounted basis, to the carrying value of the asset. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying value, no impairment is indicated. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, then an impairment is recorded based on the fair value of the asset, typically measured using a discounted cash flow model. All recognized impairment losses, whether for assets to be disposed of or for assets to be held and used, are recorded as operating losses. See Notes 10 and 11 for information related to impairment charges for long-lived assets recognized in 2006 and 2005. There were no such write-downs for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Sam's Town Tunica reported an operating loss of $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Due to a history of operating losses at Sam's Town Tunica, we continue to test the assets of Sam's Town Tunica for recoverability pursuant to SFAS No. 144 . The asset recoverability test requires estimating Sam's Town Tunica's undiscounted future cash flows and comparing that aggregate total to the property's carrying value. As the property's estimated undiscounted future cash flows exceed its carrying value, we do not believe Sam's Town Tunica's assets to be impaired at this time; however, we will continue to monitor the performance of Sam's Town Tunica and, if necessary, continue to update our asset recoverability test under SFAS No. 144. If future asset recoverability tests indicate that the assets of Sam's Town Tunica are impaired, we will be subject to a write-down of its assets which may have a material impact on our consolidated statement of operations.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not subject to amortization, but are reviewed for impairment at least annually and between annual test dates in certain circumstances. In September 2004, new accounting literature was introduced related to impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets. Refer to Note 5, " Intangible Assets and Goodwill" for additional information relating to its effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Capitalized Interest

Interest costs associated with major construction projects are capitalized as part of the cost of the constructed assets. When no debt is incurred specifically for a project, interest is capitalized on amounts expended for the project using our weighted average cost of borrowing. Capitalization of interest ceases when the project or discernible portions of the project are substantially complete. We amortize capitalized interest over the estimated useful life of the related asset. Capitalized interest for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $7.5 million, $23 million and $5.5 million, respectively.

Debt Issuance Costs

Debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the issuance of long-term debt are capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the expected terms of the related debt agreements.

Revenue Recognition and Promotional Allowances

Gaming revenue represents the net win from gaming activities, which is the difference between gaming wins and losses. All other revenue is recognized as the service is provided. The majority of our gaming revenue is counted in the form of cash, chips and tokens and therefore is not subject to any significant or complex estimation procedures. Gross revenues include the estimated retail value of rooms, food and beverage, and other goods and services provided to customers on a complimentary basis. Such amounts are then deducted as promotional allowances. The estimated costs and expenses of providing these promotional allowances are charged to the gaming department in the following amounts:



                                                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Room                                                                        $     24,189  $     21,400  $     18,997
Food and beverage                                                                128,360       126,147       101,177
Other                                                                              6,568         5,617         7,738
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Total                                                                       $    159,117  $    153,164  $    127,912
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

Promotional allowances also include incentives such as cash, goods and services (such as complimentary rooms and food and beverages) earned in our slot club and other gaming loyalty programs. We reward customers, through the use of loyalty programs, with points based on amounts wagered or won that can be redeemed for a specified period of time, principally for cash, and to a lesser extent for goods or services, depending upon the casino property. We record the estimated retail value of these goods and services as revenue and then deduct them as a promotional allowance.

Preopening Expenses

We expense certain costs of start-up activities as incurred. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we expensed $20.6 million in preopening costs, including $11.6 million related to our Echelon Place development project. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we expensed $7.7 million in preopening costs, including $3.5 million related to Echelon Place. The remaining expense incurred in 2006 and 2005 relates to various projects including the recently opened Blue Chip vessel and efforts to develop gaming activities in other jurisdictions. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we expensed $2.0 million in preopening costs, most of which related to our unsuccessful efforts to develop gaming activities in Nebraska.

Advertising Expense

Advertising costs are expensed the first time such advertising appears. Advertising costs from continuing operations are included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and totaled $108 million, $97 million and $87 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Derivative Instruments and Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, require all derivative instruments to be recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes must be adjusted to fair value through income. If the derivative qualifies and is designated as a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in its fair value will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged item through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. During the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, we utilized derivative instruments to manage interest rate risk on certain of our borrowings. In addition, Borgata, our joint venture, utilized derivative financial instruments to comply with the requirements of its bank credit agreement. For further information, see Note 7, " Derivative Instruments ."

Stock-Based Employee Compensation Plans

On January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective method and as such, results for prior periods have not been restated. This statement requires us to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). This cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. Under the modified prospective method, we expense the cost of share-based compensation awards issued after January 1, 2006. Additionally, we recognize compensation cost for the portion of awards outstanding on January 1, 2006 for which the requisite service has not been rendered over the period the requisite service is being rendered after January 1, 2006. Compensation expense related to stock option awards is calculated based on the fair value of each option grant on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

For the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded $22 million of compensation costs related to our share-based employee compensation plans in our consolidated financial statements in the following categories:




                                                                                        Year Ended
                                                                                       December 31,
                                                                                           2006
                                                                                       -------------  
Gaming                                                                                $         732
Food and beverage                                                                               103
Room                                                                                             50
Selling, general and administrative                                                           4,212
Corporate expense                                                                            14,248
Preopening expenses                                                                           1,268
                                                                                       -------------
Total share-based compensation expense from continuing operations                     $      20,613

Discontinued Operations                                                                         205
                                                                                       -------------
Total share-based compensation expense                                                       20,818

Capitalized share-based compensation                                                            830
                                                                                       -------------
Total share-based compensation costs                                                  $      21,648
                                                                                       =============


The total income tax benefit recognized in income resulting from share-based compensation expense was $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.

The effect of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R resulted in a reduction of $0.15 per basic and diluted share for both income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and net income, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we presented the benefit of all tax deductions resulting from the exercise of stock options as an operating activity in our consolidated statements of cash flows. SFAS No. 123R requires the excess tax benefit from stock option exercises (tax deduction in excess of compensation costs recognized) to be reported as a financing activity on our consolidated statement of cash flows. Excess tax benefits of $12.3 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2006 would have been classified as an operating activity if we had not adopted SFAS No. 123R.

For more information related to our share-based employee compensation plans, including our weighted average assumptions used in estimating the fair value of each option grant, see Note 9, "Stockholder's Equity and Stock Incentive Plans. "

For periods prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for employee stock options in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees , and related Interpretations. No share-based employee compensation cost was reflected in net income for those periods as all options granted under our plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the common stock on the date of grant.

The following table illustrates the effect on our income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and net income and the related per share amounts as if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R to share-based employee compensation for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.



                                                                                          Year Ended December 31,
                                                                                       ----------------------------
(In thousands, except per share data)                                                      2005           2004
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  ----------------------------
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of a change in
     accounting principle
     As reported                                                                      $     164,368  $     111,286
     Pro forma share-based compensation expense, net of tax                                 (13,378)        (6,982)
                                                                                       -------------  -------------
     Pro forma                                                                        $     150,990  $     104,304
                                                                                       =============  =============
Net income
     As reported                                                                      $     144,610  $     111,454
     Pro forma share-based compensation expense, net of tax                                 (13,513)        (6,982)
                                                                                       -------------  -------------
     Pro forma                                                                        $     131,097  $     104,472
                                                                                       =============  =============
Basic income per share from continuing operations before cumulative effect of a
   change in accounting principle
     As reported                                                                      $        1.86  $        1.45
     Pro forma                                                                                 1.71           1.36
Diluted income per share from continuing operations before cumulative effect of a
   change in accounting principle
     As reported                                                                      $        1.82  $        1.42
     Pro forma                                                                                 1.67           1.34
Basic net income per share
     As reported                                                                      $        1.63  $        1.46
     Pro forma                                                                                 1.48           1.36
Diluted net income per share
     As reported                                                                      $        1.60  $        1.42
     Pro forma                                                                                 1.45           1.34

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities". SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The fair value option established by SFAS No. 159 permits all companies to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. At each subsequent reporting date, a company shall report in earnings any unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of a company's first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, provided the company also elects to apply the provisions of SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" (see below). We are currently evaluating whether to adopt the fair value option under this SFAS No. 150 and evaluating what impact such adoption would have on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, "Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)". SFAS No. 158 requires employers to recognize the over-funded or under-funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through other comprehensive income. This Statement also requires employers to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year end and is effective for publicly traded companies as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 31, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements as we do not currently have a defined benefit postretirement plan that meets the criteria specified under SFAS No. 158.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" , which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 ("SAB No. 108"), which adds Section N to Topic 1, "Financial Statements". Section N provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. To provide full disclosure, registrants electing not to restate prior periods should reflect the effects of initially applying the guidance in Topic 1N in their financial statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. The adoption of SAB No. 108 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 ("FIN 48"), "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109". FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and applies to all tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. We do not expect the adoption of FIN 48 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-3 ("EITF 06-3"), " Disclosure Requirements for Taxes Assessed by a Governmental Authority on Revenue-Producing Transactions ." The consensus allows companies to choose between two acceptable alternatives based on their accounting policies for transactions in which the company collects taxes on behalf of a governmental authority, such as sales taxes. Under the gross method, taxes collected are accounted for as a component of sales revenue with an offsetting expense. Conversely, the net method allows a reduction to sales revenue. If such taxes are reported gross and are significant, companies should disclose the amount of those taxes. The guidance should be applied to financial reports through retrospective application for all periods presented, if amounts are significant, for interim and annual reporting beginning February 1, 2007. We have historically presented sales net of tax collected and we do not intend to change our policy; therefore, we do not expect the adoption of EITF 06-3 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140" . SFAS No. 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to irrevocably account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after December 31, 2006. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 155 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements, as we do not currently have any financial instruments that meet the criteria specified under SFAS No. 155.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates incorporated into our consolidated financial statements include the estimated useful lives for depreciable and amortizable assets, the estimated allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, the estimated valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, estimated cash flows in assessing the recoverability of long-lived assets, asset impairments, goodwill and related intangible assets, share-based payment values, fair value of derivative instruments, property closure costs, our self-insured liability reserves, slot bonus point programs, contingencies, and litigation, claims and assessments. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts in the consolidated financial statements, including the discontinued operations presentation on the consolidated statements of operations and assets and liabilities held for sale related to discontinued operations on the consolidated balance sheets, have been reclassified to conform to the December 31, 2006 presentation due to the sale of our South Coast Hotel and Casino on October 25, 2006, and the exchange agreement that we entered into on September 29, 2006, to exchange our Barbary Coast Hotel and Casino for certain real property. These reclassifications had no effect on our net income as previously reported. For further information, see Note 11, "Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale - Discontinued Operations" .

NOTE 2. - RESTRICTED INVESTMENTS

Pursuant to an investment policy related to customer payments for advanced bookings with our Hawaiian travel agency, we invest in certain financial instruments. Hawaiian regulations require us to maintain a separate charter tour client trust account solely for the purpose of the travel agency's charter tour business. Our investment policy allows us to invest these restricted funds in investments with a maximum maturity of three years and with certain credit ratings as determined by specified rating agencies.

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, our restricted investments consist of domestic fixed income U.S Treasury bonds maturing through November 2008. We have classified these investments as available for sale. The table below sets forth certain information about our restricted investments(in thousands).


                                                   Gross Unrealized
                                               -------------------------     Market
                                     Cost         Gains        Losses         Value
                                  -----------  -----------  ------------  -------------
December 31, 2005                $     9,773  $        --  $       (246) $       9,527
                                  ===========  ===========  ============  =============

December 31, 2006                $    10,029  $         5  $       (174) $       9,860
                                  ===========  ===========  ============  =============

We have classified the portions of the fair market value of these restricted investments on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets based upon the maturities of the investments. Investments maturing in less than one year have been presented in prepaid expenses and other, while all other long-term investments have been presented in other assets. Net unrealized holding gains and losses have been recorded in other comprehensive income, net of taxes, on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, we sold certain of our restricted investments and recorded restricted cash proceeds of approximately $4.5 million, which approximated our cost basis in these investments as determined by specific identification. There were no sales of our restricted investments during the year ended December 31, 2006.

NOTE 3. - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consists of the following:


                                                                                                  December 31,
                                                                           Estimated Life  ------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                 (Years)         2006          2005
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Land                                                                             --       $    261,428  $    215,815
Buildings and improvements                                                      10-40        1,939,611     1,675,070
Furniture and equipment                                                          3-10          718,647       643,686
Riverboats and barges                                                           10-40          165,362       107,180
Construction in progress                                                         --             95,556       202,606
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Total                                                                                        3,180,604     2,844,357
Less accumulated depreciation                                                                1,051,159       744,081
                                                                                           ------------  ------------
Property and equipment, net                                                               $  2,129,445  $  2,100,276
                                                                                           ============  ============

Major items included in construction in progress at December 31, 2006 consisted principally of our new corporate office building and construction related to Echelon Place.

In connection with the closing of the Stardust on November 1, 2006, we reevaluated the useful lives of all of the depreciable assets residing on the land associated with our Echelon Place development project, including our corporate office building, and recorded an additional $11.2 million in accelerated depreciation related to these assets during 2006.

 

NOTE 4. - INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO UNCONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES, NET

Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa

We and MGM MIRAGE, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, each have a 50% interest in Marina District Development Holding Co., LLC, or Holding Company. Holding Company owns all the equity interests in Marina District Development Company, LLC, d.b.a. Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa. On July 3, 2003, Borgata, located at Renaissance Pointe in Atlantic City, New Jersey, commenced operations. As the managing venturer, we are responsible for the day-to-day operations of Borgata, including the operation and improvement of the facility and business. Borgata employs a management team and full staff to perform these services for the property. We maintain the oversight responsibility for the operations, but do not directly operate Borgata. As such, we do not receive a management fee from Borgata. Borgata's bank credit agreement is secured by substantially all of its real and personal property and is non-recourse to MGM MIRAGE and us.

Summarized financial information of Borgata is as follows:

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION


                                                                                             December 31,
                                                                                   ------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                          2006            2005
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------  --------------  --------------
Assets                                                                                                           
Current assets                                                                    $      126,446  $      110,355
Property and equipment, net                                                            1,201,607       1,013,744
Other assets,  net                                                                        23,155          16,876
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
     Total assets                                                                 $    1,351,208  $    1,140,975
                                                                                   ==============  ==============
Liabilities and Member Equity
Current liabilities                                                               $      114,125  $      109,296
Long-term debt                                                                           554,600         341,700
Other liabilities                                                                         15,750          11,872
Member equity                                                                            666,733         678,107
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
     Total liabilities and member equity                                          $    1,351,208  $    1,140,975
                                                                                   ==============  ==============

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION



                                                                                       Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Gaming revenue                                                              $    735,145  $    696,965  $    623,400
Non-gaming revenue                                                               273,879       247,740       228,881
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
    Gross revenues                                                             1,009,024       944,705       852,281
Less promotional allowances                                                      195,759       180,722       175,862
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Net revenues                                                                     813,265       763,983       676,419
Expenses                                                                         566,252       512,249       460,852
Depreciation and amortization                                                     63,088        56,951        56,811
Preopening expenses                                                                6,519            --            --
Loss on asset disposals                                                            2,418           160           184
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
    Operating income                                                             174,988       194,623       158,572
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Interest and other expenses, net                                                 (23,271)      (24,738)      (34,896)
Benefit from income taxes                                                          2,116         1,303         9,789
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
    Total non-operating expenses                                                 (21,155)      (23,435)      (25,107)
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Net income                                                                  $    153,833  $    171,188  $    133,465
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

Our share of Borgata's results has been included in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the following periods on the following lines:



                                                                                       Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Our share of Borgata's operating income                                     $     87,494  $     97,312  $     79,286
Net amortization expense related to our investment in Borgata                     (1,298)       (1,298)       (1,321)
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Our share of Borgata's operating income, as reported                        $     86,196  $     96,014  $     77,965
                                                                             ============  ============  ============
Our share of Borgata's non-operating expenses, net                          $    (10,577) $    (11,718) $    (12,554)
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

Borgata Tax Credits . Based on New Jersey state income tax rules, Borgata is eligible for state tax credits under the New Jersey New Jobs Investment Tax Credit ("New Jobs Tax Credit") because Borgata made a qualified investment in a new business facility that created new jobs. The total estimated available credit related to Borgata's original investment is approximately $75 million over a five-year period, subject to certain annual conditions. An incremental credit related to Borgata's public space expansion is estimated to be approximately $1.8 million over a five-year period. Borgata began receiving refunds related to this tax credit in early 2005. As such, Borgata recorded approximately $23 million of net New Jobs Tax Credits in 2004, comprised of New Jobs Tax Credits generated from the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. Borgata has recorded approximately $16.9 million and $18.7 million of net New Jobs Tax Credits in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Borgata expects to generate net New Jobs Tax Credits of approximately $17 million for 2007 and approximately $0.3 million per annum for the years 2008 through 2010. Borgata may be entitled to incremental New Jersey New Jobs Investment Tax Credits as a result of its second hotel project.

Additionally, Borgata is eligible to receive tax credits in an amount equal to 50% of its New Jersey Adjusted Net Profits Tax ("ANP Tax"), subject to capital expenditure requirements, for the state's fiscal years ended June 30, 2004 through 2006. In 2003, Borgata placed a valuation allowance of approximately $0.5 million on the credit because it had not made any qualifying capital expenditures, nor did Borgata have any definitive expansion plans. In December 2004, Borgata commenced the public space expansion and submitted the appropriate applications for reimbursement of this tax. As such, Borgata released the $0.5 million valuation allowance on the 2003 credit and realized an additional credit of $2.4 million, representing 50% of the ANP Tax paid in 2004. This $2.9 million aggregate state tax benefit is included in Borgata's statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 and a state tax benefit of $1.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively, representing 50% of the ANP Tax paid in 2006 and 2005 is included in Borgata's statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.

Borgata Expansions . Borgata is in the process of its second expansion that will add a second hotel, The Water Club, which will include an 800-room hotel, five swimming pools, a state-of-the-art spa and additional meeting room space. This expansion project is estimated to cost approximately $400 million and is expected to be completed in early 2008. Borgata completed its $200 million public space expansion in June 2006 which added both gaming and non-gaming amenities, including additional slot machines, table games, poker tables, restaurants and a nightclub. Borgata expects to finance the expansions from its cash flow from operations and from its bank credit agreement. We do not expect to make further capital contributions to Borgata for these projects.

Borgata Distributions.  Borgata began distributions of its earnings to us in 2005 and distributed a total of $83 million and $29 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Both the joint venture agreement related to Borgata and Borgata's bank credit agreement allow for certain limited distributions to be made to its partners. In February 2006, Borgata amended its bank credit agreement, which increased the amount of allowable distributions to us. Borgata has significant uses for its cash flows, including maintenance and expansion capital expenditures, interest payments, state income taxes and debt principal payments. Borgata's cash flows are primarily used for its business needs and are not generally available (except to the extent distributions are paid to us) to service our indebtedness.

Other Unconsolidated Entities  

In January 2006, we announced plans to develop the acreage that we own on the Las Vegas Strip into Echelon Place. Plans for Echelon Place include a wholly-owned resort hotel, casino and spa and additional hotel and retail joint ventures between us and strategic partners. We expect that, in conjunction with our joint venture with Morgans Hotel Group LLC, or Morgans, we will contribute approximately 6.1 acres of land and Morgans will contribute approximately $91.5 million to the venture, and that the venture will arrange non-recourse project financing to develop the two hotel properties. We can provide no assurances that our developement plans will be completed successfully, or at all. As of December 31, 2006, we had made advances for capital expenditures to the Morgans joint venture of $3.0 million, which is presented in investments in and advances to unconsolidated subsidiaries, net, on our consolidated balance sheets.

We also have a one-third investment in Tunica Golf Course, L.L.C. (d.b.a. River Bend Links) located in Tunica, Mississippi. We account for our share of the golf course's net loss under the equity method of accounting. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, our net investment in and advances to the golf course were $0.6 million and $0.8 million, respectively, and are presented in investments in and advances to unconsolidated subsidiaries, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The following table reconciles our investments in and advances to our unconsolidated subsidiaries.


                                                                                            December 31,
                                                                                   ------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                          2006            2005
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------  --------------  --------------
Investment in and advances to Borgata:
  Cash Contributions                                                              $      254,157  $      254,157
  Accumulated amortization of 50% of our unilateral equity contribution                   (1,155)           (770)
  Deferred gain on sale of asset to Borgata, net                                            (383)           (405)
  Capitalized interest, net                                                               34,155          35,090
  Equity income                                                                          206,554         129,638
  Distributed earnings                                                                  (111,941)        (29,338)
  Other advances, net                                                                        805             355
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
Net investment in Borgata                                                                382,192         388,727

Investment in and advances to Morgans joint venture                                        2,966              --
Investment in and advances to Tunica Golf Course, L.L.C.                                     593             765
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
  Total investments in and advances to unconsolidated subsidiairies, net          $      385,751  $      389,492
                                                                                   ==============  ==============

Our net investment in Borgata differs from our share of the underlying equity in Borgata. In 2004, pursuant to an agreement with MGM MIRAGE related to the funding of Borgata's project costs, we made a unilateral capital contribution to Borgata of approximately $31 million. We are ratably amortizing $15.4 million (50% of the unilateral contribution which corresponds to our ownership percentage of Borgata) over 40 years. Also, during Borgata's initial development, construction and preopening phases, we capitalized interest on our investment and are ratably amortizing our capitalized interest over 40 years. Additionally, we are ratably accreting a deferred gain related to the sale of our airplane to Borgata over the plane's remaining useful life.

NOTE 5. - INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

During 2004, we acquired Sam's Town Shreveport and Coast Casinos. For more information, see Note 12, "Acquisitions" . In connection with those transactions, we recorded significant amounts of intangible assets and goodwill that are included in the tables below. In 2005, as further described below, we wrote-down Delta Downs license rights by $25.4 million.

Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):


                                                                    December 31,
                                                            ---------------------------
                                                                2006          2005
                                                            ------------  -------------
Las Vegas Locals trademarks                                $     54,400  $      54,400
Las Vegas Locals customer lists                                     350            350
Central Region license rights                                   486,064        486,064
Central Region customer lists                                       100            100
                                                            ------------  -------------
Total intangible assets                                         540,914        540,914
Less accumulated amortization:
    License rights                                               33,939         33,939
    Customer lists                                                  225            137
                                                            ------------  -------------
Total accumulated amortization                                   34,164         34,076
                                                            ------------  -------------
    Intangible assets, net                                 $    506,750  $     506,838
                                                            ============  =============

License rights are intangible assets acquired from the purchase of gaming entities that are located in gaming jurisdictions where competition is limited to a specified number of licensed gaming operators. License rights and trademarks are not subject to amortization as we have determined that they have an indefinite useful life.

Customer lists are being ratably amortized over a five-year period. For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, amortization expense for the customer lists was less than $0.1 million. For each year in the period ending December 31, 2009, amortization expense related to the customer lists is expected to be approximately $0.1 million, at which time the assets are expected to be fully amortized.

Included in intangible assets, net, on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, is the Barbary Coast trademark with a carrying value of $3.7 million. This trademark was excluded from the February 27, 2007 exchange transaction pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement entered into between Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, and Harrah's Operating Company, Inc., a subsidiary of Harrah's Entertainment, Inc., or Harrah's, (see Note. 11 "Asset and Liabilities Held for Sale - Discontinued Operations: Barbary Coast" for information related to the transaction); however, as we do not have any intended future use for this trademark, it will be written off during the quarter ending March 31, 2007 upon the completion of the exchange transaction, as the underlying cash flows of the Barbary Coast would no longer support its carrying value.

In September 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, of the FASB issued EITF D-108, Use of the Residual Method to Value Acquired Assets Other Than Goodwill, which requires the application of the direct value method for intangible assets acquired in business combinations completed after September 29, 2004. In addition, EITF D-108 requires companies that have applied the residual method to the valuation of intangible assets acquired prior to such date for purposes of impairment testing to perform an impairment test using the direct value method beginning with their fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2004. Impairments of intangible assets recognized upon application of a direct value method should be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.

We have utilized a residual cash flow methodology in performing our annual impairment tests for all of our indefinite-lived intangible assets acquired prior to 2004. Beginning with the transition testing in 2005 as well as annually thereafter, we utilize the direct value method to perform our impairment tests on such indefinite-lived intangible assets. Effective January 1, 2005, we completed this transition testing for all our intangible license rights and determined that the fair value of our Delta Downs intangible license rights was less than its book value. Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2005, we recorded a non-cash charge of $25.4 million, $16.4 million, net of taxes, to reduce the balance of this asset to its fair value. This charge has been reflected as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of taxes, in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

Goodwill represents the excess of total acquisition costs over the fair market value of net assets acquired in a business combination and consists of the following (in thousands):


                                                                    December 31,
                                                            ---------------------------
                                                                2006          2005
                                                            ------------  -------------
Las Vegas Locals goodwill                                  $    381,024  $     381,024
Downtown Las Vegas goodwill                                       6,997          6,997
Central Region goodwill                                          22,319         22,319
                                                            ------------  -------------
Total goodwill                                                  410,340        410,340
Less accumulated amortization                                     6,134          6,134
                                                            ------------  -------------
     Goodwill, net                                         $    404,206  $     404,206
                                                            ============  =============

Goodwill and indefinite-lived assets must be tested for impairment at least annually and between annual test dates in certain circumstances. We perform our annual impairment test for goodwill and indefinite-lived assets in the second quarter of each year. No impairments were indicated as a result of the annual impairment reviews for goodwill and indefinite-lived assets for 2006, 2005 or 2004. During 2005, we performed impairment tests on our license rights at Treasure Chest and Delta Downs pursuant to triggering events related to hurricanes. For more information, see Note 13, "Insurance Coverage Related to Hurricane Impacts."

NOTE 6. - LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following:


                                                                                            December 31,
                                                                                   ------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                          2006            2005
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------  --------------  --------------
Bank credit facility                                                              $      973,300  $    1,626,800
8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2012                                                 250,000         250,000
7.75% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2012                                                 300,000         300,000
6.75% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2014                                                 350,000         350,000
7.125% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2016                                                250,000              --
Other                                                                                     14,160          30,235
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
Total long-term debt                                                                   2,137,460       2,557,035
Less current maturities                                                                   (5,550)         (5,729)
Market value adjustment related to interest rate swaps                                     1,106           1,489
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
     Total                                                                        $    2,133,016  $    2,552,795
                                                                                   ==============  ==============

In connection with our fair value hedging transactions (see Note 7, " Derivative Instruments" ), as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 we increased the carrying value of certain of our long-term debt instruments by $1.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively, and also recorded a corresponding asset on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, representing the fair market value of the derivative instrument at those dates.

Bank Credit Facility . On July 1, 2004 and concurrent with the consummation of the merger with Coast Casinos, Inc., the $1.6 billion bank credit facility (the "Bank Credit Facility") among Boyd Gaming, Bank of America, N.A and certain other financial institutions became effective. The Bank Credit Facility replaced our old bank credit facility, and as such, we recorded a $4.3 million non-cash loss on early retirement of debt for the year ended December 31, 2004 for the write-off of unamortized debt fees associated with our old bank credit facility.

On June 30, 2005, we entered into a First Amendment to Credit Agreement which amended certain terms of our bank credit facility. Among other changes, the amendment increased the revolving portion of the existing bank credit facility by $250 million and extended the maturity date of the revolving portion of the bank credit facility by one year. The amendment did not change the amount or maturity date of the term loan portion of the bank credit facility.

On July 25, 2006, we entered into a Second Amendment to Credit Agreement which amended certain terms of our bank credit facility. Among other changes, the amendment permitted us to transfer our interest in the South Coast and excluded the purchase of the Company's common stock from Michael J. Gaughan in connection with the sale of South Coast from the calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio.

The Bank Credit Facility consists of a $1.35 billion revolving credit facility and a $500 million term loan. The revolving credit facility matures in June 2010 and the term loan matures in June 2011. The term loan is required to be repaid in increments of $1.25 million per quarter that began on September 30, 2004 and will continue through March 31, 2011. Amounts repaid under the term loan may not be reborrowed. The interest rate on the term loan is based upon the agent bank's quoted base rate or the eurodollar rate, plus a fixed margin. The interest rate on the revolving credit facility is based upon the agent bank's quoted base rate or the eurodollar rate, plus an applicable margin that is determined by the level of a predefined financial leverage ratio. In addition, we incur commitment fees on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility that ranges from 0.25% to 0.50% per annum. The Bank Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of Boyd Gaming's real and personal property (other than stock and other equity interests), including each of its wholly-owned casino properties.

On October 25, 2006, pursuant to the terms of the Unit Purchase Agreement that we entered into to sell South Coast to Michael J. Gaughan, we received approximately $401 million, which was used to repay a portion of the outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility. See Note 11, "Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale - Discontinued Operations: South Coast" for more information related to the sale.

The blended interest rates for outstanding borrowings under the bank credit facility at December 31, 2006 and 2005 were 6.8% and 5.7%, respectively. At December 31, 2006, approximately $488 million was outstanding under the term loan, $486 million was outstanding under our revolving credit facility, and $5.2 million was allocated to support various letters of credit, leaving availability under the Bank Credit Facility of approximately $859 million.

The Bank Credit Facility contains certain financial and other covenants, including, without limitation, various covenants (i) requiring the maintenance of a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, (ii) establishing a maximum permitted total leverage ratio and senior leverage ratio, (iii) imposing limitations on the incurrence of additional secured indebtedness and (iv) imposing restrictions on investments, dividends and certain other payments. We believe we are in compliance with the Bank Credit Facility covenants as of December 31, 2006.

8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due April 2012.  On April 8, 2002, we issued $250 million principal amount of 8.75% senior subordinated notes due April 2012. The notes require semi-annual interest payments on April 15th and October 15th of each year through April 2012, at which time the entire principal balance becomes due and payable. The notes contain certain restrictive covenants regarding, among other things, incurrence of debt, sales of assets, mergers and consolidations and limitations on restricted payments (as defined in the indenture governing the notes). We believe we are in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2006. On or after April 15, 2007, we may redeem all or a portion of the notes at redemption prices ranging from 104.375% in 2007 to 100% in 2010 and thereafter , plus accrued and unpaid interest.

7.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due December 2012.  On December 30, 2002, we issued $300 million principal amount of 7.75% senior subordinated notes due December 2012. The notes require semi-annual interest payments on June 15th and December 15th of each year that began in June 2003 and will continue through December 2012, at which time the entire principal balance becomes due and payable. The notes contain certain restrictive covenants regarding, among other things, incurrence of debt, sales of assets, mergers and consolidations and limitations on restricted payments (as defined in the indenture governing the notes). We believe we are in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2006. On or after December 15, 2007, we may redeem all or a portion of the exchange notes at redemption prices ranging from 103.875% in 2007 to 100% in 2010 and thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

6.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due April 2014.  On April 15, 2004, we issued, through a private placement, $350 million principal amount of 6.75% senior subordinated notes due April 2014. In July 2004, all but $50,000 in aggregate principal amount of these notes were exchanged for substantially similar notes that were registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The notes require semi-annual interest payments on April 15 and October 15 of each year, that began in October 2004 and will continue through April 2014, at which time the entire principal balance becomes due and payable. The notes contain certain restrictive covenants regarding, among other things, incurrence of debt, sales of assets, mergers and consolidations and limitations on restricted payments (as defined in the indenture governing the notes). We believe we are in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2006. At any time prior to April 15, 2007, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding notes with the net proceeds from equity offerings at a redemption price of 106.75% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, subject to certain conditions. On or after April 15, 2009, we may redeem all or a portion of the notes at redemption prices (expressed as percentages of the principal amount) ranging from 103.375% in 2009 to 100% in 2012 and thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

7.125% Senior Subordinated Notes due February 2016. On January 30, 2006, we issued $250 million principal amount of 7.125% senior subordinated notes due February 2016. The net proceeds of this debt issuance were approximately $246 million, which were used to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings on the revolving portion of our bank credit facility. The notes require semi-annual interest payments on February 1st and August 1st of each year that began in August 2006 and will continue through February 2016, at which time the entire principal balance becomes due and payable. The notes contain certain restrictive covenants regarding, among other things, incurrence of debt, sales of assets, mergers and consolidations and limitations on restricted payments (as defined in the indenture governing the notes). We believe we are in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2006. At any time prior to February 1, 2009, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding notes with the net proceeds from one or more public equity offerings at a redemption price of 107.125% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, subject to certain conditions. At any time prior to February 1, 2011, we may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, pursuant to a "make-whole" call as provided in the indenture governing the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. On or after February 1, 2011, we may redeem all or a portion of the notes at redemption prices ranging from 103.563% in 2011 to 100% in 2014 and thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

9.25% Senior Notes Originally due August 2009.  On August 1, 2005, we redeemed all $200 million principal amount of our 9.25% senior notes originally due in 2009 at a redemption price of $1.046.25 per $1,000.00 principal amount of notes. The redemption was funded by availability under our bank credit facility. A loss on early retirement of debt of $17.5 million, comprised of the premium related to the call for redemption of these notes, unamortized deferred loan costs for the notes and the notes' market adjustments from fair value hedges, was recorded on our consolidated statement of operations during 2005.

Other Debt.  In November 2004, in connection with the acquisition of certain real estate, we assumed a mortgage with a balance of $15.8 million that was secured by the real property. The mortgage was payable in equal monthly installments of principal and interest at the rate of 8.8% per annum through May 1, 2007, when the remaining balance was to become due and payable. We paid the remaining balance of approximately $15.4 million in October 2006.

In February 2003, we issued a note in the amount of $16 million to finance the purchase of a company airplane. The note bears interest at the rate of 5.7% per annum. The note is payable in 120 equal monthly installments of principal and interest until March 2013, when the remaining balance becomes due and payable. The note is secured by the airplane.

The estimated fair value of our long-term debt at December 31, 2006 was approximately $2.2 billion, versus its book value of $2.1 billion. The estimated fair value of our long-term debt at December 31, 2005 was approximately $2.6 billion, versus its book value of $2.6 billion. The estimated fair value amounts were based on quoted market prices on or about December 31, 2006 and 2005 for our debt securities that are traded. For the debt securities that are not traded, fair value was based on book value due primarily to the short maturities of the debt components.

The scheduled maturities of long-term debt for the years ending December 31 are as follows (in thousands):




2007           $        5,550
2008                    5,582
2009                    5,616
2010                  491,452
2011                  468,190
Thereafter          1,161,070
                --------------
     Total     $    2,137,460
                ==============

NOTE 7. - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

We utilize derivative instruments to manage certain interest rate risk. The net effect of our interest rate swaps resulted in a reduction in interest expense of $2.2 million, $0.6 million and $5.1 million, respectively, as compared to the contractual rate of the underlying hedged debt for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate Swaps . During 2005, we paid a total of $4.7 million to terminate four fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $200 million. At December 31, 2006, the total notional amount of the remaining fixed- to-floating interest rate swap was $50 million. This interest rate swap converts a portion of our fixed-rate debt to a floating rate. The variable interest rate on this swap is set in arrears. As such, we estimate the variable rate based upon the prevailing interest rates and the implied forward rates in the yield curve. This variable rate estimate is used to record the effect of the interest rate swap until the variable rate is set, at which time any further adjustments between our estimate and the actual rate are recorded. At December 31, 2006, we estimated the floating rate to be 7.9% and our fixed rate was 8.8%.

The interest rate swap that converts a portion of our fixed-rate debt to a floating rate is designated as a fair value hedge and qualifies for the "shortcut" method allowed under GAAP, which allows for an assumption of no ineffectiveness. Thus, there is no income statement impact from changes in the fair value of this hedging instrument. Instead, the fair value of this instrument is recorded as an asset or liability on our consolidated balance sheets with an offsetting adjustment to the carrying value of the related debt. As such, we recorded an asset of $1.1 million and $1.5 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, in other assets on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets, representing the fair market values of the interest rate swap at those dates.

Floating-to-Fixed Interest Rate Swaps . In June 2005, we entered into four swaps with a total notional amount of $200 million. These swaps convert the eurodollar-based interest rate on a portion of our floating rate debt to a fixed rate and qualify as cash flow hedges. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, these swaps had a weighted average fixed rate of 4.1% and a floating rate of 5.4% and 4.0%, respectively. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we recorded an asset of $5.9 million and $5.4 million, respectively, in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, representing the fair market values of these swaps. The offsetting entry for these swap values was an increase to other comprehensive income of $3.7 million, net of $2.3 million in taxes and $3.3 million, net of $2.1 million in taxes, for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, as these cash flow hedges were deemed to be effective.

In the third quarter 2006, we entered into three floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps with a forward start date of June 30, 2008, with a combined notional amount of $200 million. We determined that these derivative instruments did not meet the requirements for hedge accounting during 2006 and have therefore recorded a $1.8 million charge for the change in fair value of these derivative instruments in our consolidated statements of operations for year ended December 31, 2006. We have also recorded a corresponding liability of $1.8 million included as part of other liabilities on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006. Effective January 1, 2007, these forward starting swaps met the requirements to qualify for hedge accounting.

Interest Rate Collars . In August 2005, we paid $0.6 million to enter into two interest rate collars with a total notional amount of $100 million. These collars are designated as cash flow hedges and limit the eurodollar-based interest rate between 5.3% and 3.5% on a portion of our floating rate debt. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we recorded an asset of $0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively, in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Approximately $0.1 million was recorded in the consolidated statements of operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, representing the ineffective portion of the collars during the period.

We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the interest rate swap agreements; however, we believe that this risk is minimized because we monitor the credit ratings of the counterparties to the agreements. If we had terminated our swaps as of December 31, 2006, we would have been entitled to receive a net total of $5.9 million based on the fair values of the derivative instruments.

Borgata Derivative Instruments. In addition, Borgata, our joint venture, utilized derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges, the last of which expired in December 2005. Our share of the increase or decrease in fair value of certain financial instruments related to hedges deemed to be ineffective was a net loss of $0.4 million in 2005 and a net gain of $0.1 million in 2004, respectively, and is reported on our accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Our share of the net increase in the fair value of certain financial instruments related to hedges deemed to be effective was $1.9 million and $3.0 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively, and is reported in other comprehensive income on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

NOTE 8. - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases

In connection with the July 1, 2004 merger with Coast Casinos, we assumed certain land leases. The Orleans is situated on approximately 77 acres of leased land. The lease had an effective commencement date of October 1, 1995, an initial term of 50 years, and includes an option, exercisable by us, to extend the initial term for an additional 25 years. The lease provides for monthly rental payments of $0.2 million through February 2006 and $0.3 million during the 60-month period thereafter. In March 2011, annual rental payments will increase in a compounding basis at a rate of 3.0% per annum. In addition, we have an option to purchase the real property during the two-year period commencing in February 2016.

Suncoast is situated on approximately 49 acres of leased land. The initial term of the land lease expires in December 2055. The lease contains three options to extend the term of the lease for 10 years each. The lease provides for monthly rental payments of approximately $0.2 million in 2004 that increase slightly each year. The landlord has the option to require us to purchase the property at the end of 2014 and each year-end through 2018, at the fair market value of the real property at the time the landlord exercises the option, subject to certain pricing limitations. Based on the terms of the lease, the potential purchase price commitment ranges from approximately $31 million to approximately $51 million in the years 2014 through 2018. If we do not purchase the property if and when required, we would be in default of the lease agreement.

In addition, we have other land leases related primarily to the California, the Fremont, Sam's Town Tunica, Treasure Chest and Sam's Town Shreveport. Future minimum lease payments required under noncancelable operating leases (primarily for land leases) as of December 31, 2006 are as follows (in thousands):




2007           $       17,285
2008                   15,649
2009                   13,598
2010                   11,762
2011                   11,226
Thereafter            472,562
                --------------
     Total     $      542,082
                ==============

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $22 million, $31 million and $16.5 million, respectively, and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

Other Commitments

State of Illinois Wagering Tax. In 2005, the Illinois legislature passed new legislation for wagering taxes that imposes a minimum wagering tax for casinos for the next two state-based fiscal years ending June 30, 2007. Under these minimum wagering tax provisions, during each of the State's fiscal years ending June 30, 2006 and 2007, Par-A-Dice will be required to remit to the State the amount, if any, by which $43 million exceeds the wagering taxes actually paid by Par-A-Dice during each of those fiscal years. The payments, if any, are required by each of June 15, 2006 and 2007. Effective July 1, 2005, we incorporated this minimum payment provision into the effective gaming tax rate for Par-A-Dice. Par-A-Dice paid $6.2 million for Illinois State wagering taxes on June 15, 2006. In addition, Par-A-Dice paid $6.7 million on June 15, 2006 for a retroactive Illinois gaming tax assessment, which was the result of a 2006 modification by the Illinois State Legislature requiring licensees to pay an additional 5% tax on adjusted gross gaming revenues retroactive to July 1, 2005.

Treasure Chest. We are required to pay to the City of Kenner, Louisiana, a boarding fee of $2.50 for each passenger boarding our Treasure Chest riverboat casino during the year. The future minimum payment due in 2007 to the City of Kenner, based upon a portion of actual passenger counts from the prior year, is approximately $2.8 million.

Dania Jai Alai. On June 5, 2006, we entered into a purchase agreement to acquire Dania Jai Alai and approximately 47 acres of related land located in Dania Beach, Florida. Dania Jai Alai is one of four pari-mutuel facilities approved under Florida law to operate 1,500 Class III slot machines. We expect to finance the acquisition through availability under our bank credit facility.

On August 8, 2006, a three-judge panel of the First District Court of Appeals in Broward County, Florida overturned a lower court decision which in turn could lead to the invalidation of a November 2004 initiative approved by Florida voters to operate slot machines at certain pari-mutuel gaming facilities in Broward County. This decision was essentially reaffirmed by the First District Court of Appeals on November 30, 2006, with two questions being certified to the Florida Supreme Court. If the initiative is invalidated, we may not be able to operate slot machines at the Dania Jai Alai facility, which would materially affect any potential revenue and cash flow expected from the Dania Jai Alai facility.

In February 2007, we received our slot license for our acquisition of Dania Jai Alai. We also modified our agreement to purchase this operation. Under the revised agreement, we are required to pay an aggregate of $77.5 million upon closing of this transaction, and we will be required to pay an additional $75 million in March 2010, or earlier, if certain conditions are satisfied. We will not record a liability for the additional $75 million obligation until the contingency has been resolved and the consideration is distributable. At that time, the $75 million payment will be added to the cost of the acquisition. We closed the transaction on March 1, 2007 and we plan to begin construction in the second half of 2007 with a grand opening of the casino operation around the end of 2008.

Echelon Place. In January 2006, we formed a joint venture with Morgans Hotel Group LLC, or Morgans, whereby we will contribute approximately 6.1 acres of land and Morgans will contribute approximately $91.5 million to the venture, and that the venture will arrange non-recourse project financing to develop two hotel properties, the Delano Las Vegas and the Mondrian Las Vegas.

Management Incentive Plan. Certain of our executive officers participate in a long-term management incentive plan (the "Plan"), which currently extends through December 31, 2009. Certain components of the Plan cannot be measured until the end of the performance period. As such, we do not accrue for these items over the life of the Plan, but rather accrue for that portion of the Plan when it becomes measurable. Estimated possible future maximum payouts are $2.2 million in 2007, $5.2 million in 2008 and $5.2 million in 2009.

Contingencies

Copeland. Alvin C. Copeland is the sole shareholder of an entity that applied in 1993 for a riverboat license at the location of our Treasure Chest Casino. Copeland was unsuccessful in the application process and has made several attempts to have the Treasure Chest license revoked and awarded to his company. In 1999, Copeland filed a direct action against Treasure Chest and certain other parties seeking the revocation of Treasure Chest's license, an award of the license to him and monetary damages. The suit was dismissed by the trial court citing that Copeland failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The dismissal was appealed by Copeland to the Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal. On June 21, 2002, the First Circuit Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's decision and remanded the matter to the trial court. On January 14, 2003, we filed a motion to dismiss the matter and that motion was denied. The Court of Appeal refused to reverse the denial of the motion to dismiss. In May 2004, we filed additional motions to dismiss on other grounds, which motions are currently pending. It is not possible to determine the likely date of trial, if any, at this time. We intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit. If this matter ultimately results in the Treasure Chest license being revoked, it could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are also parties to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that, except for the matters discussed above, all pending claims, if adversely decided, would not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 9. - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS

Stock Options

As of December 31, 2006, we had two stock option plans in effect, both of which have been approved by our shareholders. Stock options awarded under these plans are granted to our employees and directors. The number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under these plans is approximately 21.6 million shares.

Options granted under the plans generally become exercisable ratably over a three-year period from the date of grant. Options that have been granted under the plans had an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant and will expire no later than ten years after the date of grant.

Summarized stock option plan activity for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:



                                                                                          Weighted     Aggregate
                                                                          Range of         Average     Intrinsic
                                                                          Options          Option        Value
                                                          Options          Prices           Price    (In thousands)
                                                        -----------  ------------------   ---------  -------------- 
Options outstanding at January 1, 2004                   7,516,405     $ 4.35 - $17.21   $   10.57
Options granted                                          2,497,000       16.37 - 36.76       34.20
Options canceled                                          (189,611)       4.55 - 17.21       14.23
Options exercised                                       (3,186,283)       4.35 - 17.21        7.21
                                                        -----------
Options outstanding at December 31, 2004                 6,637,511     $ 4.35 - $36.76   $   20.97
Options granted                                          1,895,000       39.96 - 52.35       40.14
Options canceled                                          (195,913)       4.56 - 36.76       20.88
Options exercised                                       (1,749,369)       4.50 - 36.76       12.58
                                                        -----------
Options outstanding at December 31, 2005                 6,587,229     $ 4.35 - $52.35   $   28.71
Options granted                                          1,694,000       39.00 - 48.40       39.18
Options canceled                                          (463,326)       4.56 - 39.96       37.08
Options exercised                                       (1,266,116)       4.50 - 39.96       15.42
                                                        -----------
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006                 6,551,787     $ 4.35 - $52.35   $   33.40  $       78,280
                                                        ===========  ==================   =========  ==============

Options exercisable at December 31, 2004                 2,408,918                       $   11.42  $       72,826
                                                        ===========                       =========  ==============
Options exercisable at December 31, 2005                 2,562,482                       $   19.74  $       71,544
                                                        ===========                       =========  ==============
Options exercisable at December 31, 2006                 3,139,713                       $   27.75  $       55,194
                                                        ===========                       =========  ==============

Shares available for grant at December 31, 2006          3,953,483
                                                        ===========

The following table summarizes the information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2006:


                                  Options Outstanding            Options Exercisable
                          ------------------------------------ -----------------------
                                         Weighted
                                         Average     Weighted                Weighted
                                        Remaining     Average                 Average
                             Number    Contractual   Exercise     Number     Exercise
Range of Exercise Prices  Outstanding  Life (Years)    Price   Exercisable     Price
------------------------- ------------ ------------  --------- ------------  ---------
$  4.35 -  $25.75           1,466,626         5.72  $   15.11    1,361,047  $   14.50
  36.76 -   36.76           1,740,661         7.47      36.76    1,186,032      36.76
  39.00 -   39.00           1,639,000         9.82      39.00           --         --
  39.96 -   52.35           1,705,500         8.42      40.31      592,634      40.14
                          ------------                         ------------
                            6,551,787         7.91      33.40    3,139,713      27.75
                          ============                         ============

Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123R. The total intrinsic value of in-the-money options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2006 was $35 million. The total fair value of options vested during the year ended December 31, 2006 was approximately $21 million. As of December 31, 2006, there was approximately $29 million of total unrecognized share-based compensation costs related to unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over approximately two years, the weighted average remaining requisite service period.

Restricted Stock Units

On May 18, 2006, our board of directors amended and restated our 2002 Stock Incentive Plan to provide for the grant of Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs"). An RSU is an award which may be earned in whole or in part upon the passage of time or the attainment of performance criteria and which may be settled for cash, shares or other securities or a combination of cash, shares or other securities. The RSUs do not contain voting rights and are not entitled to dividends. We awarded to certain members of our board of directors a total of 17,500 RSUs with a grant date fair value of $43.17 per unit each fully vested upon grant and to be paid in shares of common stock upon cessation of service on the board of directors.

Career Shares

In January 2007, we issued 26,000 Career Shares to certain of our executive management employees. The Career Shares reward eligible executives with annual grants of Boyd Gaming stock units, to be paid out at retirement. The payout at retirement is dependent upon the respective executive's age at retirement and the number of years of service with the Company. Executives must be at least 60 years old and have at least 15 years of service to receive a payout at retirement. We recorded $0.3 million in January 2007 for expenses related to the issuance of these Career Shares.

Stock Repurchase Plan

On November 11, 2002, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to two million shares of our common stock. Depending upon market conditions, shares may be repurchased from time to time at prevailing market prices through open market or negotiated transactions. No date was established for the completion of the share repurchase program. We are not obligated to purchase any shares. Subject to applicable corporate securities laws, repurchases may be made at such times and in such amounts as management deems appropriate. Purchases under the program can be discontinued at any time management feels additional purchases are not warranted. We will finance the purchases with funds from our operations. We did not repurchase any stock during the years ended December 31, 2005 or 2004. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we repurchased an aggregate of approximately 1.1 million shares of our common stock for a total cost of $13.4 million, leaving a remainder of approximately 0.9 million shares of our common stock available to be repurchased under the plan.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock at a price per share of $32.4844. These shares were repurchased pursuant to the terms of the Unit Purchase Agreement that we entered into with Michael J. Gaughan in connection with the sale of South Coast and were not purchased as a part of the aforementioned repurchase program. See Note 11, "Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale: - Discontinued Operations: South Coast" for more information related to this sale.

Dividends

In July 2003, our Board of Directors instituted a policy of quarterly cash dividends on our common stock. Dividends are declared at our Board's discretion. We are subject to certain limitations regarding the payment of dividends, such as restricted payment limitations related to our outstanding notes and our bank credit facility. The following table sets forth the cash dividends declared and paid in 2006 and 2005.


                                              Dividend
                                                Per
Payment Date              Record Date          Share
------------------        ------------------ ---------
March 1, 2005             February 11, 2005  $  0.085
June 1, 2005              May 13, 2005          0.125
September 1, 2005         August 12, 2005       0.125
December 1, 2005          November 10, 2005     0.125
March 1, 2006             February 10, 2006     0.125
June 1, 2006              May 12, 2006          0.135
September 1, 2006         August 11, 2006       0.135
December 1, 2006          November 10, 2006     0.135

Dividends paid in 2006 and 2005 totaled $47 million and $41 million, respectively. On January 25, 2007, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.135 per share of our common stock, payable March 1, 2007 to shareholders of record on February 9, 2007.

 

NOTE 10. - WRITE-DOWNS AND OTHER CHARGES, NET

Write-downs and other charges, net include the following:



                                                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Asset write-downs, net                                                      $     31,778  $     56,000  $         --
Hurricane and related items                                                      (36,294)        9,274            --
Property closure costs                                                            13,354            --            --
Gain on sales of undeveloped land and other assets                                    --          (659)      (10,309)
Merger, acquisition and transition related expenses                                   --            --         6,534
Blue Chip consulting termination fee                                                  --            --         5,000
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
    Total write-downs and other charges, net                                $      8,838  $     64,615  $      1,225
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

Asset Write-downs

Asset write-downs during the year ended December 31, 2006 include $28 million related to the write-off of the net book value of the original Blue Chip gaming vessel, which was replaced with a new gaming vessel in conjunction with our expansion project. After analysis of alternative uses for the original vessel, management decided in June 2006 to permanently retire the asset from further operations, resulting in the write-off. In addition, we recorded a $3.0 million asset write-down during the year ended December 31, 2006 related to land held for sale in Pennsylvania that we previously planned to utilize as a site for a gaming operation. In September 2006, we withdrew our application for gaming approval, which led to our decision to sell the land (see Note 11, "Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale - Land Held for Sale" ).

During the year ended December 31, 2005, we recorded a $56 million non-cash impairment loss to write down the long-lived assets at Stardust to their estimated fair value. Because we intend to redevelop the land on which Stardust is located and our plans include demolishing Stardust's existing buildings and abandoning other related assets, we performed an impairment test for this property. This non-cash charge was the result of our calculation of the estimated remaining net cash flows for Stardust compared to the net book value of the assets expected to be demolished or abandoned.

Hurricane and Related Items

On August 27, 2005, Treasure Chest Casino in Kenner, Louisiana closed as a result of Hurricane Katrina. The property suffered minor damage from the hurricane and reopened for business on October 10, 2005. On September 22, 2005, Delta Downs Racetrack Casino & Hotel closed as a result of Hurricane Rita. Delta Downs reopened for business on November 3, 2005 with limited hours of operation and limited food and beverage outlets. Delta Downs resumed normal operating hours beginning in December 2005 and horse racing resumed in April 2006. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we recorded $9.3 million of net hurricane related expenses. In December 2006, we reached a final settlement with our insurance carrier for our coverage at Delta Downs and recognized a gain of $36 million during the year ended December 31, 2006. See Note 13, " Insurance Coverage Related to Hurricane Impacts" for additional information.

Property Closure Costs

In connection with our Echelon Place development project, we closed the Stardust Hotel and Casino on November 1, 2006 and expect to demolish the property in March 2007. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded $13.4 million in property closure costs, the majority of which represents exit and disposal costs related to one-time employee termination benefits and contract termination costs.

Merger, Acquisition and Transition Related Expenses

During 2004, we incurred $5.9 million and $0.6 million for expenses related to our purchase of Sam's Town Shreveport on May 19, 2004 and Coast Casinos on July 1, 2004, respectively.

Blue Chip Consulting Termination Fee

A consulting agreement signed in connection with Blue Chip's purchase agreement provided for a $5.0 million contingent payment if certain tribal gaming facilities had not commenced gaming operations near our Blue Chip casino by a specified date. As tribal gaming facilities had not commenced by the specified date, we expensed and paid the $5.0 million fee during 2004.

 

NOTE 11. - ASSETS AND LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE

Land Held for Sale

In September 2006, we made the decision to sell land that we own in Pennsylvania that we previously planned to utilize as a site for a gaming operation. We withdrew our application for gaming approval, which led to our decision to sell the land and recorded a $3.0 million non-cash write-down of the land to its fair value less estimated costs to sell. The remaining $23 million carrying value of the land is classified as held for sale on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Discontinued Operations

South Coast

On July 25, 2006, we entered into a Unit Purchase Agreement, as amended, (the "Agreement") to sell South Coast to Michael J. Gaughan for a total purchase price of approximately $513 million. This transaction closed on October 25, 2006.

As consideration for South Coast, Mr. Gaughan:

  • paid us the net proceeds from the public offering of his 12,342,504 shares of our common stock and
  • applied the principal amount of the term note described below to the purchase price.

A total of 12,342,504 shares of our common stock owned by Mr. Gaughan were sold to a group of underwriters in a registered public offering for $32.4844 per share, or an aggregate of approximately $401 million.

Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, on August 7, 2006, we repurchased 3,447,501 shares of our common stock from Mr. Gaughan directly. As consideration for the repurchase, we issued a term note to Mr. Gaughan in the aggregate amount of approximately $112 million. In connection with the closing of the transaction, the term note was cancelled on October 25, 2006.

Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Mr. Gaughan resigned from his position as a member of our board of directors on September 6, 2006 and ceased to be a Boyd Gaming employee on October 25, 2006. In addition, on August 4, 2006, Mr. Gaughan surrendered all of his options to acquire Boyd Gaming common stock, effectively canceling his vested options to purchase 88,334 shares and forfeiting his unvested options to purchase 176,666 shares.

In connection with the sale of South Coast, we recorded a loss on the sale of approximately $69 million during the year ended December 31, 2006, which is included in the loss from discontinued operations on our consolidated statement of operations.

Barbary Coast

On September 29, 2006, we entered into an exchange agreement (the "Exchange Agreement") with Harrah's, whereby we agreed to exchange the Barbary Coast and its related 4.2 acres of land for a total of approximately 24 acres located north of and contiguous to our Echelon Place development project on the Las Vegas Strip in a nonmonetary, tax-free transaction, which closed on February 27, 2007. Harrah's purchased the 24-acre site in October 2006 from unrelated third parties for aggregate cash consideration of approximately $364 million.

In connection with entering into the Exchange Agreement during the year ended December 31, 2006, we met all of the criteria required to classify certain of the assets and liabilities of Barbary Coast as held for sale on our consolidated balance sheets. As such, we ceased depreciation of those assets in September 2006. Upon the closing of the transaction, during the quarter ending March 31, 2007, we expect to record a non-cash, pre-tax gain of approximately $280 million including the write-off of the $3.7 million carrying value of the Barbary Coast trademark as we will retain the trademark but no longer have underlying cash flows to support its value.

Summary Financial Information for Discontinued Operations

The operating results of South Coast and Barbary Coast for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are presented as net income (loss) from discontinued operations on our consolidated statements of operations. The assets held for sale and liabilities related to assets held for sale for South Coast and Barbary Coast are separately presented on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005. Included in the income (loss) from discontinued operations is an allocation of interest expense related to the $401 million of debt repaid as a result of the South Coast disposal transaction, as well as other consolidated interest based on the ratio of: (i) the net assets of our discontinued operations less the debt repaid as a result of the South Coast disposal transaction, to (ii) the sum of total consolidated net assets and consolidated debt of the Company, other than the debt repaid as a result of the disposal transaction. The amount of interest expense that was allocated to discontinued operations was $26 million, $2.7 million and $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Summary operating results for the discontinued operations are as follows:



                                                                                        Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Net revenues                                                                $    204,819  $     61,935  $     26,851
Loss on disposition of South Coast                                               (68,606)           --            --
Operating income (loss)                                                          (42,972)       (2,542)        1,559
Income (loss) from discontinued operations                                       (69,219)       (5,253)          260
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes                                         24,649         1,934           (92)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations                                   (44,570)       (3,319)          168


The major classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale are as follows:



                                                                                     December 31,
                                                                             --------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------
Accounts receivable, net                                                    $         40  $        625
Inventories                                                                          312         2,697
Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                             --           829
Property and equipment, net                                                      102,625       634,210
Other assets, net                                                                     --           673
Accrued liabilities                                                                2,993         3,925




NOTE 12. - ACQUISITIONS

On July 1, 2004, we consummated a $1.3 billion merger with Coast Casinos, Inc., or Coast, pursuant to which Coast became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Boyd Gaming Corporation. The Coast stockholders received approximately $482 million in cash, and the Coast stock and option holders received approximately 19.4 million shares of our common stock. In connection with the merger, we refinanced substantially all of Coast's debt.

On May 19, 2004, we acquired all of the outstanding limited and general partnership interests of the partnership that owned the Shreveport Hotel and Casino in Shreveport, Louisiana for approximately $197 million. After the acquisition, we renamed the property Sam's Town Hotel and Casino and refer to the property as Sam's Town Shreveport.

The pro forma consolidated results of operations, as if both the Sam's Town Shreveport and Coast acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2004, are as follows (in thousands, except per share data):




                                                                                        Year Ended
                                                                                       December 31,
                                                                                           2004
Pro Forma                                                                              -------------  
    Net revenues                                                                      $   2,071,771
    Income from continuing operations before a cumulative effect of a
      change in accounting principle                                                        124,963
    Basic income per common share from continuing operations before
      cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle                                    1.45
    Diluted income per common share from continuing operations before
      cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle                                    1.42


NOTE 13. - INSURANCE COVERAGE RELATED TO HURRICANE IMPACTS

Treasure Chest Casino. On August 27, 2005, Treasure Chest Casino in Kenner, Louisiana closed as a result of Hurricane Katrina. The property suffered minor damage from the hurricane and reopened for business on October 10, 2005.

Delta Downs Racetrack Casino & Hotel. On September 22, 2005, Delta Downs Racetrack Casino & Hotel closed as a result of Hurricane Rita. Delta Downs reopened for business on November 3, 2005 with limited hours of operation and limited food and beverage outlets. Delta Downs resumed normal operating hours beginning in December 2005 and horse racing resumed in April 2006.

Property Damage - Delta Downs. Our insurance policy carried on Delta Downs for the policy year ended June 30, 2006 included coverage for replacement costs related to property damage with an associated deductible of $1.0 million and certain other limitations. We have submitted insurance claims for the property damage sustained by Delta Downs from the hurricane because the damage exceeded the related insurance deductible.

During 2006, we completed substantially all of the hurricane reconstruction work at Delta Downs and incurred approximately $42 million of capital expenditures related to this reconstruction project. As of December 31, 2006, we have received insurance advances related to property damage at Delta Downs of $40 million. In December 2006, we reached a final settlement with our insurance carrier and recognized a gain of $36 million on our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006, $33 million of which represents the amount of insurance advances related to property damage in excess of the $7.0 million net book value of assets damaged or destroyed by the hurricane.

Business Interruption-Delta Downs. For the policy year ended June 30, 2006, Delta Downs maintained business interruption insurance that covers lost profits and continuing normal operating expenses, up to a maximum of $1 million per day. As of December 31, 2006, we have received advances of $11.7 million related to business interruption coverage as part of the final settlement from our insurance carrier, approximately $9.1 million of which relates to recoveries of post-closing costs and $2.6 million of which related to lost profits at Delta Downs. The $2.6 million of insurance recoveries related to lost profits has been included in our gain of $36 million on our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Business Interruption-Treasure Chest. For the policy year ended June 30, 2006, Treasure Chest maintained business interruption insurance that covers lost profits and continuing normal operating expenses, up to a maximum amount of $10 million. This coverage pertains to business interruption due to civil authority, ingress/egress or off-premise utility interruption. Our insurance carrier has notified us that they are denying our business interruption claim. Therefore, we have not recorded a receivable from our insurance carrier for post-closing expenses as recovery of these amounts currently does not appear to be probable. We intend to vigorously pursue our claims under Treasure Chest's insurance policy.

NOTE 14. - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

We contribute to multi-employer pension plans under various union agreements. Contributions, based on wages paid to covered employees, totaled approximately $2.2 million, $2.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. Our share of the unfunded liability related to multi-employer plans, if any, is not determinable.

We have retirement savings plans under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code covering our non-union employees. The plans allow employees to defer up to the lesser of the Internal Revenue Code prescribed maximum amount or 100% of their income on a pre-tax basis through contributions to the plans. We expensed our voluntary contributions to the 401(k) profit-sharing plans and trusts of $11.7 million, $10.5 million and $7.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

NOTE 15. - INCOME TAXES

A summary of the provision for income taxes is as follows:



                                                                                       Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Current
   Federal                                                                  $     81,737  $     90,930  $     19,880
   State                                                                            (310)        1,059        27,398
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
                                                                                  81,427        91,989        47,278
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Deferred
   Federal                                                                         1,821        (5,093)       40,082
   State                                                                           2,243          (912)      (11,807)
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
                                                                                   4,064        (6,005)       28,275
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Provision for taxes related to continuing operations                        $     85,491  $     85,984  $     75,553
                                                                             ============  ============  ============
Income tax provision (benefit) included on the consolidated
  statements of operations
   Provision for taxes related to continuing operations                     $     85,491  $     85,984  $     75,553
   Provision (benefit) related to discontinued operations                        (24,649)       (1,934)           92
   Tax benefit related to cumulative change in accounting principle                   --        (8,984)           --
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
     Total                                                                  $     60,842  $     75,066  $     75,645
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

The following table provides a reconciliation between the federal statutory rate and the effective income tax rate from continuing operations where both are expressed as a percentage of income.



                                                                December 31,
                                                           ----------------------
                                                            2006    2005    2004
---------------------------------------------------------  ------  ------  ------ 
Tax provision at statutory rate                             35.0 %  35.0 %  35.0 %
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
  State income taxes, net of federal benefit                 0.5      --     5.4
  Other, net                                                (0.9)   (0.7)     --
                                                           ------  ------  ------
     Total                                                  34.6 %  34.3 %  40.4 %
                                                           ======  ======  ======

The tax items comprising our net deferred tax liabilities are as follows:


                                                                                            December 31,
                                                                                   ------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                          2006            2005
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------  --------------  --------------
Deferred tax liabilities:                                                         $               $
  Difference between book and tax basis of property                                      207,120         231,432
  Difference between book and tax basis of intangible assets                              99,675          78,833
  State tax liability, net of federal effect                                              11,339          13,493
  Reserve differential for gaming activities                                               2,965           3,077
  Derivative instruments market adjustment                                                 2,298           2,071
  Prepaid services and supplies                                                            2,177           2,203
  Other                                                                                    2,169           1,868
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
  Gross deferred tax liabilities                                                         327,743         332,977
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
Deferred tax assets:
  Reserve for employee benefits                                                            9,509           9,491
  Share-based compensation                                                                 6,999              --
  State net operating loss carryforwards, net of federal effect                            5,110           4,975
  Provision for doubtful accounts                                                          2,888           3,115
  Preopening expenses                                                                      2,038           3,050
  Other                                                                                    2,873             393
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
  Gross deferred tax assets                                                               29,417          21,024
     Valuation allowance                                                                  (1,628)         (1,881)
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
     Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance                                      27,789          19,143
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
       Net deferred tax liabilities                                               $      299,954  $      313,834
                                                                                   ==============  ==============

The items comprising our deferred income taxes as presented on the consolidated balance sheets are as follows:


                                                                                            December 31,
                                                                                   ------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                          2006            2005
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------  --------------  --------------
Net deferred tax liabilities                                                      $      299,954  $      313,834
Current deferred tax asset seperately presented                                            1,685           2,683
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
Deferred income taxes                                                             $      301,639  $      316,517
                                                                                   ==============  ==============

While we are not under any current Internal Revenue Service examination, our tax returns filed for 2003 and later years may be selected for examination. Additionally, although tax years 2001 and 2002 are closed by statute, the tax returns filed in those years are subject to adjustment to the extent of the net operating losses carried back for refund in these years. Our acquired subsidiary, Coast Casinos, Inc., is currently under examination for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the six month period ended July 1, 2004, the date of our acquisition. We do not believe that the resolution of these examinations will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

We are currently under examination for various state income and franchise tax matters. Based on our current expectations for the final resolutions of these matters, we believe that we will have adequately reserved for any tax liability; however, the ultimate resolution of these examinations may result in an outcome that is different from our current expectation. We do not believe that the resolution of these examinations will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

As of December 31, 2006, we have state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $96 million, primarily in the states of Indiana and Louisiana, to reduce future state income taxes. The net operating losses will expire at various dates from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2026 if not fully utilized. State net operating losses arising from stock option exercises in excess of amounts charged to operations will result in approximately $1.6 million of additional paid in capital, if a reduction in our current tax payable occurs.

The 2005 provision for taxes includes a net tax benefit of $1.5 million for tax retention credits related to the hurricanes that impacted our Louisiana operations in 2005.

In 2003, we received a proposed assessment from the Indiana Department of Revenue based upon its position that our Indiana gaming revenue tax is not deductible for Indiana state income tax purposes. An unrelated third party had been litigating the issue in the Indiana Tax Court for several years under a similar fact pattern. Due to the uncertainty of the outcome of the Tax Court litigation, we had been accruing a portion of the proposed assessment and our estimate of potential future assessments based on our estimate of the probability of loss. On April 19, 2004, the Indiana Tax Court ruled against the third party. On September 28, 2004, the Indiana Supreme Court denied the third party's petition for review, affirming the Tax Court's earlier decision.

After the April 2004 ruling, we determined that it was probable that we had incurred a liability for the entire assessment and estimated future assessments and have recorded the related remaining amounts. As such, we recorded a $5.7 million charge, net of federal income tax benefit, to our provision for income taxes during the year ended December 31, 2004. As of December 31, 2004, we have settled all outstanding tax assessments related to this issue.

NOTE 16. - EARNINGS PER SHARE

Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share consisted of the following:



                                                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
   a change in accounting principle                                         $    161,348  $    164,368  $    111,286
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

Weighted average common shares outstanding                                        88,380        88,528        76,586
Dilutive effect of stock options                                                   1,213         1,979         1,649
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Weighted average common and potential shares outstanding                          89,593        90,507        78,235
                                                                             ============  ============  ============


Nearly all of the options outstanding during 2006 and 2005 were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as the grant prices of those options were less than the average market price of our common stock during those periods. Weighted average options to purchase approximately 0.1 million shares of our common stock at December 31, 2004 at a price of $36.76 were outstanding during the period but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their exercise price was in excess of the average market price of our common stock for that period.

NOTE 17. - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Percentage Ownership

William S. Boyd, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, together with his immediate family, beneficially owned approximately 36% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of December 31, 2006. As a result, the Boyd family has the ability to significantly influence our affairs, including the election of our directors and, except as otherwise provided by law, approving or disapproving other matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders, including a merger, consolidation or sale of assets. For the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, there were no material related party transactions between us and the Boyd family.

South Coast Sale

On July 25, 2006, we entered into the Agreement to sell South Coast to Mr. Gaughan, who at the time was an Officer and a member of our Board of Directors, for a purchase price equal to the net proceeds from the sale of all 15,790,005 shares of Boyd Gaming stock owned by Mr. Gaughan. The transaction closed on October 25, 2006. See Note 11, " Assets and Liabilities Held For Sale - Discontinued Operations: South Coast Sale" for additional information related to the South Coast sale. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, for a period of five years following the closing of the sale of South Coast, Mr. Gaughan cannot sell South Coast to any party other than us, or an affiliate of ours, and for three additional years thereafter we will have a right of first refusal on any potential sale of South Coast.

North Las Vegas Land

In February 2006, we purchased a 40-acre, fully entitled casino site in North Las Vegas for approximately $35 million from a group that included the father of Michael J. Gaughan. At the time of the purchase, Michael J. Gaughan was an Officer and a member of our Board of Directors.

Borgata

In August 2004, we sold an airplane to Borgata, our 50% joint venture, for use in Borgata's business, for the airplane's appraised value of $5.8 million. In connection with this sale, we recorded a net gain of $0.4 million that is recorded in corporate expense on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations during the year ended December 31, 2004. During 2004, Robert L. Boughner, a member of our board of directors, was the Chief Executive Officer of Marina District Development Company, L.L.C., d.b.a. Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa.

NOTE 18. - SEGMENT INFORMATION

We have aggregated certain of our properties in order to present five reportable segments: Las Vegas Locals, Stardust, Downtown Las Vegas, Central Region and Borgata, our 50% joint venture in Atlantic City, New Jersey. The table below lists the classification of each of our properties. Beginning in 2006, we have reclassified the reporting of our Coast Casinos and Boulder Strip properties so that they are now included together as part of the Las Vegas Locals segment due to their similar market characteristics. We have reclassified the results for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 to conform to the current presentation. Due to the disposition of Barbary Coast and South Coast, the operating results from these two properties are classified as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented and are excluded from our presentation in the Las Vegas Locals segment. In addition, we ceased operations at the Stardust on November 1, 2006. Results for the Las Vegas Locals segment also include the results of an offsite sports book. Results for Downtown Las Vegas include the results of our two travel agencies and our Hawaiian-based insurance company.

Las Vegas Locals

 

Gold Coast Hotel and Casino

Las Vegas, NV

The Orleans Hotel and Casino

Las Vegas, NV

Sam's Town Hotel and Gambling Hall

Las Vegas, NV

Suncoast Hotel and Casino

Las Vegas, NV

Eldorado Casino

Henderson, NV

Jokers Wild Casino

Henderson, NV

   

Stardust Resort and Casino

Las Vegas, NV

Downtown Las Vegas

 

California Hotel and Casino

Las Vegas, NV

Fremont Hotel and Casino

Las Vegas, NV

Main Street Station Casino, Brewery and Hotel

Las Vegas, NV

Central Region

 

Sam's Town Hotel and Gambling Hall

Tunica, MS

Par-A-Dice Hotel Casino

East Peoria, IL

Treasure Chest Casino

Kenner, LA

Blue Chip Hotel and Casino

Michigan City, IN

Delta Downs Racetrack Casino & Hotel

Vinton, LA

Sam's Town Hotel and Casino

Shreveport, LA

   

Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa

Atlantic City, NJ

 

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain operating data for our reportable segments. We completed our acquisition of Sam's Town Shreveport on May 19, 2004. Also, on July 1, 2004, we completed our merger with Coast Casinos.



                                                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Gross Revenues
    Las Vegas Locals                                                        $    946,176  $    969,165  $    554,275
    Stardust (2)                                                                 135,019       183,020       174,579
    Downtown Las Vegas                                                           278,737       282,363       260,377
    Central Region                                                             1,074,989       967,381       912,852
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
            Total gross revenues                                            $  2,434,921  $  2,401,929  $  1,902,083
                                                                             ============  ============  ============
Adjusted EBITDA (1)
    Las Vegas Locals                                                        $    273,797  $    299,913  $    150,976
    Stardust (2)                                                                  15,403        24,651        18,016
    Downtown Las Vegas                                                            53,573        52,295        38,738
    Central Region (3)                                                           257,570       224,816       191,198
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
        Wholly-owned property adjusted EBITDA                                    600,343       601,675       398,928
        Corporate expense (7)                                                    (39,981)      (44,101)      (33,338)
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
            Wholly-owned adjusted EBITDA                                         560,362       557,574       365,590
        Our share of Borgata's operating income before net
          amortization, preopening and other expenses (8)                         91,963        97,392        79,286
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
            Total Adjusted EBITDA                                                652,325       654,966       444,876
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Other operating costs and expenses
    Deferred rent                                                                  4,630         4,936         1,994
    Depreciation and amortization (9)                                            189,837       171,958       135,425
    Preopening expenses (4)                                                       20,623         7,690         1,953
    Our share of Borgata's preopening expenses                                     3,260            --            --
    Our share of Borgata's loss on asset disposals                                 1,209            80            --
    Share-based compensation expense (4)                                          19,278            --            --
    Write-downs and other charges, net                                             8,838        64,615         1,225
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
            Total other operating costs and expenses                             247,675       249,279       140,597
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Operating income                                                                 404,650       405,687       304,279
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Other non-operating costs and expenses
    Interest expense, net (5)                                                    145,433       126,088       100,542
    Decrease in value of derivative instruments                                    1,801            --            --
    Loss on early retirements of debt                                                 --        17,529         4,344
    Our share of Borgata's non-operating expenses, net                            10,577        11,718        12,554
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
            Total other non-operating costs and expenses                         157,811       155,335       117,440
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes
    and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle                    246,839       250,352       186,839
Provision for income taxes                                                       (85,491)      (85,984)      (75,553)
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
    a change in accounting principle                                        $    161,348  $    164,368  $    111,286
                                                                             ============  ============  ============


                                                                                           December 31,
                                                                                   ------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                          2006            2005
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------  --------------  --------------
Property and Equipment, Intangible Assets and Goodwill
  Las Vegas Locals                                                                $    1,474,955  $    1,497,890
  Stardust                                                                                45,859          62,886
  Downtown Las Vegas                                                                     134,124         128,917
  Central Region                                                                       1,194,812       1,216,953
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
    Total properties' assets                                                           2,849,750       2,906,646
  Corporate entities                                                                     190,651         104,674
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
    Total assets (6)                                                              $    3,040,401  $    3,011,320
                                                                                  ==============  ==============



                                                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Additions to Property and Equipment and Other Assets
   Las Vegas Locals                                                         $     48,716  $     39,677  $     41,566
   Stardust                                                                          222         6,928         5,850
   Downtown Las Vegas                                                             22,877        15,297        12,444
   Central Region                                                                 82,059       173,650       136,382
   Discontinued operations                                                        59,778       423,845        84,960
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
      Total properties' additions                                                213,652       659,397       281,202
   Corporate entities                                                            113,614        35,216        48,059
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
      Total additions to property and equipment and other assets                 327,266       694,613       329,261
      Change in accrued property additions                                       109,198       (76,169)      (44,649)
      Debt assumed in connection with acquisition of land                             --            --       (15,764)
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
      Cash-based property additions                                         $    436,464  $    618,444  $    268,848
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

(1) Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, is a commonly used measure of performance in our industry which we believe, when considered with measures calculated in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), gives investors a more complete understanding of operating results before the impact of investing and financing transactions and income taxes and facilitates comparisons between us and our competitors. Management has historically adjusted EBITDA when evaluating operating performance because we believe that the inclusion or exclusion of certain recurring and non-recurring items is necessary to provide the most accurate measure of our core operating results and as a means to evaluate period-to-period results. We have chosen to provide this information to investors to enable them to perform more meaningful comparisons of past, present and future operating results and as a means to evaluate the results of core on-going operations. We do not reflect such items when calculating EBITDA; however, we adjust for these items and refer to this measure as Adjusted EBITDA. We have historically reported this measure to our investors and believe that the continued inclusion of Adjusted EBITDA provides consistency in our financial reporting. We use Adjusted EBITDA because we believe it is useful to investors in allowing greater transparency related to a significant measure used by management in its financial and operational decision-making. Adjusted EBITDA is among the more significant factors in management's internal evaluation of total company and individual property performance and in the evaluation of incentive compensation related to property management. Management also uses Adjusted EBITDA as a measure in determining the value of acquisitions and dispositions. Adjusted EBITDA is also widely used by management in the annual budget process. Externally, we believe these measures continue to be used by investors in their assessment of our operating performance and the valuation of our company. Adjusted EBITDA reflects EBITDA adjusted for deferred rent, preopening expenses, share-based compensation expense, change in value of derivative instruments, gain or loss on early retirement of debt, write-downs and other charges, net and our share of Borgata's non-operating expenses, preopening expenses and gain or loss on asset disposals.

(2) We closed the Stardust on November 1, 2006.

(3) Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes a $6.7 million retroactive gaming tax assessment at Par- A-Dice.

(4) We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share Based Payment" , on January 1, 2006 and recorded $21 million of share-based compensation expense related to continuing operations during the year ended December 31, 2006. Of this amount, $1.3 million is included in preopening expenses on our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.

(5) Net of interest income and amounts capitalized.

(6) Total assets represent total property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization.

 

(7) The following table reconciles the presentation of corporate expense on our consolidated statements of operations to the presentation on the accompanying table:



                                                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
-------------------------------------------------------------------------    ------------  ------------  ------------
Corporate expense as reported on our consolidated statements of operations  $     54,229  $     44,101  $     33,338
Corporate share-based compensation expense                                       (14,248)           --            --
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Corporate expense as reported on accompanying table                         $     39,981  $     44,101  $     33,338
                                                                             ============  ============  ============


(8) The following table reconciles the presentation of our share of Borgata's operating income on our consolidated statements of operations to the presentation of our share of Borgata's results on the accompanying table:



                                                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
-------------------------------------------------------------------------    ------------  ------------  ------------
Operating income from Borgata, as reported on our
  consolidated statements of operations                                     $     86,196  $     96,014  $     77,965
Add back:
    Net amortization expense related to our
        investment in Borgata                                                      1,298         1,298         1,321
    Our share of Borgata's preopening expenses                                     3,260            --            --
    Our share of Borgata's loss on asset disposals                                 1,209            80            --
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Our share of Borgata's operating income before net
    amortization, preopening and other expenses                             $     91,963  $     97,392  $     79,286
                                                                             ============  ============  ============

(9) The following table reconciles the presentation of depreciation and amortization on our consolidated statements of operations to the presentation on the accompanying table:



                                                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------------
(In thousands)                                                                   2006          2005          2004
-------------------------------------------------------------------------    ------------  ------------  ------------
Depreciation and amortization as reported on our
    consolidated statements of operations                                   $    188,539  $    170,660  $    134,104
Net amortization expense related to our
    investment in Borgata                                                          1,298         1,298         1,321
                                                                             ------------  ------------  ------------
Depreciation and amortization as reported on
    accompanying table                                                      $    189,837  $    171,958  $    135,425
                                                                             ============  ============  ============


 

NOTE 19. - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)



                                                                        Year Ended December 31, 2006
                                                  --------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share data)                First         Second        Third         Fourth        Total
------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Net revenues                                     $    589,622  $    551,490  $    530,686  $    520,836  $  2,192,634
Operating income                                      138,382        57,476        85,692       123,100       404,650
Income from continuing operations before
  cumulative effect of a change
  in accounting principle                              65,269        12,366        28,076        55,637       161,348
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations         (2,029)       (2,206)      (41,006)          671       (44,570)
Net income (loss)                                      63,240        10,160       (12,930)       56,308       116,778
                                                  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Basic and diluted net income per common share:
Income from continuing operations before
  cumulative effect of a change
  in accounting principle - basic                $       0.73  $       0.14  $       0.32  $       0.64  $       1.83
Income from continuing operations before
  cumulative effect of a change
  in accounting principle - diluted                      0.72          0.14          0.32          0.63          1.80
Income (loss) from discontinued operations - basic      (0.02)        (0.03)        (0.47)         0.01         (0.51)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations - diluted    (0.02)        (0.03)        (0.47)         0.01         (0.50)
Net income (loss) - basic                                0.71          0.11         (0.15)         0.65          1.32
Net income (loss) - diluted                              0.70          0.11         (0.15)         0.64          1.30
                                                  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------



                                                                         Year Ended December 31, 2005
                                                  --------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share data)                First         Second        Third         Fourth        Total
------------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Net revenues                                     $    552,784  $    540,890  $    523,479  $    543,932  $  2,161,085
Operating income                                      122,501       110,329       102,620        70,237       405,687
Income from continuing operations before
  cumulative effect of a change
  in accounting principle                              56,038        48,704        33,863        25,763       164,368
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations            481           (66)         (915)       (2,819)       (3,319)
Net income                                             40,080        48,638        32,948        22,944       144,610
                                                  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Basic and diluted net income per common share:
Income from continuing operations before
  cumulative effect of a change
  in accounting principle - basic                $       0.64  $       0.55  $       0.38  $       0.29  $       1.86
Income from continuing operations before
  cumulative effect of a change
  in accounting principle - diluted                      0.62          0.54          0.37          0.28          1.82
Income (loss) from discontinued operations - basic       0.01            --         (0.01)        (0.03)        (0.04)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations - diluted     0.01            --         (0.01)        (0.03)        (0.04)
Net Income - basic                                       0.46          0.55          0.37          0.26          1.63
Net Income - diluted                                     0.45          0.54          0.36          0.25          1.60
                                                  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------

 

(c) Exhibits.

Exhibit
Number

Document

2.1

Purchase Agreement, entered into as of June 5, 2006, by and among the Registrant, FGB Development, Inc., Boyd Florida, LLC, The Aragon Group, Inc., Summersport Enterprises, LLLP, the Shareholders of The Aragon Group, Inc., The Limited Partners of Summersport Enterprises, LLLP, and Stephen F. Snyder, individually and as Shareholder Representative With Respect to Dania Jai Alai (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006).

   

2.2

Unit Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2006, as amended, by and among the Registrant, Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc., Silverado South Strip, LLC, and Michael J. Gaughan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 31, 2006).

   

2.3

Agreement for Exchange of Assets and Joint Escrow Instructions, dated as of September 29, 2006, entered into by and between Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. and Harrah's Operating Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006).

   

2.4

Letter Agreement entered into as of August 11, 2006, by and among the Registrant, FGB Development, Inc., Boyd Florida, LLC, The Aragon Group, Inc., Summersport Enterprises, LLLP, and Stephen F. Snyder, individually and as Shareholder Representative, amending certain provisions of that certain Purchase Agreement previously entered into among the parties as of June 5, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006).

   

3.1

Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-64006, which was declared effective on October 15, 1993).

3.2

Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999).

3.3

Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1996).

3.4

Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000).

   

3.5

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 24, 2006).

3.6

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 24, 2006).

4.1

Form of Indenture relating to $250,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012, dated as of April 8, 2002, by and between the Registrant, as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, including the Form of Note (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-89774, which was declared effective on June 19, 2002).

4.2

Form of Indenture relating to $300,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012, dated as of December 30, 2002, by and between the Registrant, as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, including Form of Note (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-103023, which was declared effective on May 15, 2003).

4.3

Form of Indenture relating to $350,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014, dated as of April 15, 2004, by and between the Registrant, as Issuer, and the Initial Purchasers, named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-116373, which was declared effective on June 25, 2004).

4.4

Form of Indenture relating to senior debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant's Automatic Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 dated December 16, 2005).

4.5

Form of Indenture relating to subordinated debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Registrant's Automatic Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 dated December 16, 2005).

4.6

Form of Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the Registrant's Automatic Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 dated December 16, 2005).

4.7

Form of Indenture relating to subordinated debt securities, dated as of January 25, 2006, by and between the Registrant, as Issuer, and the Initial Purchasers, named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 25, 2006).

4.8

First Supplemental Indenture with respect to the 7.125% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016, dated as of January 30, 2006, by and between the Registrant, as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2006).

10.1

Ninety-Nine Year Lease dated June 30, 1954, by and among Fremont Hotel, Inc., and Charles L. Ronnow and J.L. Ronnow, and Alice Elizabeth Ronnow (incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-51672, of California Hotel and Casino and California Hotel Finance Corporation, which was declared effective on November 18, 1992).

10.2

Lease Agreement dated October 31, 1963, by and between Fremont Hotel, Inc. and Cora Edit Garehime (incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-51672, of California Hotel and Casino and California Hotel Finance Corporation, which was declared effective on November 18, 1992)

10.3

Lease Agreement dated December 31, 1963, by and among Fremont Hotel, Inc., Bank of Nevada and Leon H. Rockwell, Jr. (incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-51672, of California Hotel and Casino and California Hotel Finance Corporation, which was declared effective on November 18, 1992).

10.4

Lease Agreement dated June 7, 1971, by and among Anthony Antonacci, Margaret Fay Simon and Bank of Nevada, as Co-Trustees under Peter Albert Simon's Last Will and Testament, and related Assignment of Lease dated February 25, 1985 to Sam-Will, Inc. and Fremont Hotel, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33- 51672, of California Hotel and Casino and California Hotel Finance Corporation, which was declared effective on November 18, 1992).

10.5

Lease Agreement dated July 25, 1973, by and between CH&C and William Peccole, as Trustee of the Peter Peccole 1970 Trust (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1995).

10.6

Lease Agreement dated July 1, 1974, by and among Fremont Hotel, Inc. and Bank of Nevada, Leon H. Rockwell, Jr. and Margorie Rockwell Riley (incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-51672, of California Hotel and Casino and California Hotel Finance Corporation, which was declared effective on November 18, 1992).

10.7

Ninety-Nine Year Lease, dated December 1, 1978, by and between Matthew Paratore, and George W. Morgan and LaRue Morgan, and related Lease Assignment dated November 10, 1987, to Sam-Will, Inc., d.b.a. Fremont Hotel and Casino (incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-51672, of California Hotel and Casino and California Hotel Finance Corporation, which was declared effective on November 18, 1992).

10.8

Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-64006, which was declared effective on October 15, 1993).

10.9*

1993 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan and related agreements (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-64006, which was declared effective on October 15, 1993).

10.10*

1993 Directors Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan and related agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-79895, dated June 3, 1999).

10.11*

1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and related agreement (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-64006, which was declared effective on October 15, 1993).

10.12

401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-51672, of California Hotel and Casino and California Hotel Finance Corporation, which was declared effective on November 18, 1992).

10.13*

2000 Executive Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on April 21, 2000).

10.14*

1996 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended on May 25, 2000) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000).

10.15

Second Amended and Restated Joint Venture Agreement with Marina District Development Company, dated as of August 31, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000).

10.16

Contribution and Adoption Agreement by and among Marina District Development Holding Co., LLC, MAC, Corp. and Boyd Atlantic City, Inc., effective as of December 13, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).

10.17*

Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002).

10.18

Credit Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2004, among the Registrant as the Borrower, certain commercial lending institutions as the Lenders, Bank of America, N.A. as the Administrative Agent and L/C Issuer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as the Swing Line Lender, CIBC World Markets Corp. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Co-Syndication Agents and Calyon New York Branch and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 9, 2004).

10.19

Letter Agreement between MAC, Corp. and Boyd Atlantic City, Inc., dated as of June 16, 2004, relating to the agreement of final project costs and the settlement of capital contributions (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004).

10.20*

Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).

10.21*

Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).

10.22*

The Boyd Gaming Corporation Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for the Board of Directors and Key Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).

10.23*

Amendment Number 1 to the Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).

10.24*

Amendment Number 2 to the Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).

10.25*

Amendment Number 3 to the Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).

10.26*

Amendment Number 4 to the Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).

10.27

Ground Lease dated as of October 1, 1995, between the Tiberti Company and Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. (as successor to Gold Coast Hotel and Casino) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Coast Resorts, Inc.'s Amendment No. 2 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10 (Commission File No. 000-26922) filed with the Commission on January 12, 1996).

10.28

Ground Lease dated as of October 28, 1994, by and among 21 Stars, Ltd., as landlord, Barbary Coast Hotel & Casino, as tenant, Wanda Peccole, as successor trustee of the Peccole 1982 Trust dated February 15, 1982 ("Trust"), and The William Peter and Wanda Ruth Peccole Family Limited Partnership, and together with Trust, as owner, as amended (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Coast Resorts, Inc.'s General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10 (Commission File No. 000-26922) filed with the Commission on October 3, 1995).

10.29

Second Amendment to the Ground Lease Agreement between 21 Stars, Ltd. and Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc., dated as of May 26, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Coast Resorts, Inc. (Commission File No. 000-26922) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003).

10.30*

Form of Stock Option Award Agreement Under the Registrant's Directors' Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005).

10.31*

Boyd Gaming Corporation's 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended and restated on May 12, 2005) (incorporated by reference to Appendix B of the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on April 12, 2005).

10.32

First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2005, among the Registrant, as the Borrower, various financial institutions as the Lenders, and Bank of America, N.A., as the Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 5, 2005).

10.33

Joint Venture Agreement dated January 3, 2006, between Morgans/LV Investment LLC and Echelon Resorts Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 3, 2006).

10.34*

Summary of Compensation Arrangements.

10.35*

Amendment Number 5 to the Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005).

10.36*

Amended and Restated 2000 Executive Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 24, 2006).

10.37*

Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 24, 2006).

10.38*

Form of Award Agreement for Restricted Stock Units under the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006).

10.39

First Amendment to Morgans Las Vegas, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement, by and between Morgans Las Vegas LLC and Echelon Resorts Corporation, Dated May 15, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006).

10.40

Letter Agreement to the Morgans Las Vegas, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement, dated May 15, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006).

10.41

Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2006, among the Registrant, as Borrower, various financial institutions as the Lenders, and Bank of America, N.A., as the Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006).

10.42

Stock Purchase Agreement, entered into as of August 1, 2006, by and between Michael J. Gaughan and the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006).

10.43

Form of Term Note issued by the Registrant to Michael J. Gaughan on August 1, 2006 in connection with the Stock Purchase Agreement entered into between the parties on the same date (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006).

10.44*

Form of Award Agreement for Restricted Stock Units under the 2002 Stock Incentive Plans (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 24, 2006).

10.45*

Form of Career Restricted Stock Unit Award Unit Agreement under the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 13, 2006).

10.46*

Change in Control Severance Plan for Tier I, II and III Executives.

10.47*

Summary of Ellis Landau Severance Arrangements

21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

23.1

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

23.2

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

24

Power of Attorney (included in Part IV to this Form 10-K).

31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).

31.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).

32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a - 14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350.

32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a - 14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350.

99.1

Governmental Gaming Regulations

99.2

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Marina District Development Company, LLC, d.b.a. Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa, as of and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006.

    *Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 1, 2007.

BOYD GAMING CORPORATION

By:

/S/    JEFFREY G. SANTORO


Jeffrey G. Santoro
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints William S. Boyd, Paul J. Chakmak and Jeffrey G. Santoro, and each of them, his of her attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ WILLIAM S. BOYD


William S. Boyd

Chairman of the Board of Directors,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

March 1, 2007

/s/ MARIANNE BOYD JOHNSON


Marianne Boyd Johnson

Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors,
Senior Vice President and Director

March 1, 2007

/s/ PAUL J. CHAKMAK


Paul J. Chakmak

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)

March 1, 2007

/s/ JEFFREY G. SANTORO


Jeffrey G. Santoro

Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)

March 1, 2007

/s/ KEITH E. SMITH


Keith E. Smith

President, Chief Operating Officer and Director

March 1, 2007

/s/ WILLIAM R. BOYD


William R. Boyd

Vice President and Director

March 1, 2007

 


Robert L. Boughner

Director

 


Thomas V. Girardi

Director

/s/ LUTHER W. MACK, JR.


Luther W. Mack, Jr.

Director

March 1, 2007

/s/ MICHAEL O. MAFFIE.


Michael O. Maffie

Director

March 1, 2007

/s/ MAJ. GEN. BILLY G. MCCOY, RET. USAF


Maj. Gen. Billy G. McCoy, Ret. USAF

Director

March 1, 2007

/s/ FREDERICK J. SCHWAB


Frederick J. Schwab

Director

March 1, 2007

/s/ PETER M. THOMAS


Peter M. Thomas

Director

March 1, 2007

/s/ VERONICA J. WILSON


Veronica J. Wilson

Director

March 1, 2007

EXHIBIT INDEX

10.34*

Summary of Compensation Arrangements.      PDF as a courtesy

   

10.46*

Change in Control Severance Plan for Tier I, II and III Executives.      PDF as a courtesy

   

10.47*

Summary of Ellis Landau Severance Arrangements      PDF as a courtesy

21.1

Subsidiaries of Registrant.      PDF as a courtesy

23.1

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.      PDF as a courtesy

23.2

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.      PDF as a courtesy

24

Power of Attorney (included in Part IV to this Form 10-K).

31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).      PDF as a courtesy

31.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).      PDF as a courtesy

32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a - 14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350.      PDF as a courtesy

32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a - 14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350.      PDF as a courtesy

99.1

Governmental Gaming Regulations      PDF as a courtesy

99.2

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Marina District Development Company, LLC, d.b.a. Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa, as of and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006.      PDF as a courtesy

* Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.








Exhibit 10.34

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

Annual Base Salary

Our executive officers are "at will" employees. Currently we have no written or oral employment arrangements with our executive officers. A copy or description of any future such employment arrangement will be filed to the extent required.

The table below summarizes the current annual base salary we have with each of our named executive officers and directors. All of the compensation arrangements we have with our executive officers are reviewed and may be modified from time to time by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee of our Board of Directors.

Name

Annual Base Salary

William S. Boyd
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
  

2007:

$ 1,500,000

 

 

 

Robert L. Boughner
Director and Chief Executive Officer of Echelon Resorts Corporation

2007:

$ 1,050,000

 

 

 

Keith E. Smith
President, Chief Operating Officer and Director

2007:

$ 800,000

 

 

 

Paul J. Chakmak
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

2007:

$ 525,000

 

 

 

Marianne Boyd Johnson
Vice Chairman and Senior Vice President

2007:

$ 230,000

Bonus Plans, Director Compensation Arrangements and Other Compensation

The information regarding bonus plans, director compensation arrangements and other compensation is set forth in our most recent definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (and any definitive Annual Proxy Statement filed after the date hereof), which information is incorporated herein by reference.








Exhibit 10.46

Boyd Gaming Corporation

Change-in-Control
Severance Plan for Tier I, II and III Executives

December 7, 2006


Contents

 

 

 


Article 1. Establishment and Term of the Plan

1

   

Article 2. Definitions

1

   

Article 3. Severance Benefits

5

   

Article 4. Noncompetition and Confidentiality

8

   

Article 5. Excise Taxes

9

   

Article 6. Contractual Rights and Legal Remedies

10

   

Article 7. Successors

11

   

Article 8. Miscellaneous

11

   

Boyd Gaming Corporation
Change-in-Control Severance Plan for Tier I, II and III Executives

Article 1. Establishment and Term of the Plan

1.1 Establishment of the Plan . Boyd Gaming Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") hereby establishes a severance plan to be known as the Boyd Gaming Corporation Change-in-Control Severance Plan for Tier I, II and III Executives" (the "Plan"). The Plan provides severance benefits to certain employees (as identified in Appendix A) of the Company ("Executive" or "Executives") upon certain terminations of employment from the Company.

The Company considers the establishment and maintenance of a sound and vital management to be essential to protecting and enhancing the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. In this connection, the Company recognizes that, as is the case with many publicly held corporations, the possibility of a change in control may arise and that such possibility, and the uncertainty and questions which it may raise among management, may result in the departure or distraction of management personnel to the detriment of the Company and its stockholders.

Accordingly, the Board has determined that appropriate steps should be taken to reinforce and encourage the continued attention and dedication of members of the Company's management to their assigned duties without distraction in circumstances arising from the possibility of a Change in Control of the Company.

1.2 Plan Term . This Plan will commence on December 7, 2006 (the "Effective Date") and shall continue in effect for two full calendar years (through December 6, 2008) (the "Initial Term").

The Initial Term of this Plan automatically shall be extended for two additional years at the end of the Initial Term, and then again after each successive two-year period thereafter (each such two-year period following the Initial Term a "Successive Period"). However, the Company may terminate this Plan entirely or terminate any individual Executive's participation in the Plan at the end of the Initial Term, or at the end of any Successive Period thereafter, by giving all Executives (or select Executives if terminating select Executives' participation in the Plan) written notice of intent not to renew, delivered at least six (6) months prior to the end of such Initial Term or Successive Period. If such notice is properly delivered by the Company (in accordance with Section 8.3), this Plan, along with all corresponding rights, duties, and covenants shall automatically expire (with respect to all applicable persons if terminating select Executives' participation) at the end of the Initial Term or Successive Period then in progress.

1.3 Change-in-Control Renewal . In the event that a Change in Control of the Company occurs during the Initial Term or any Successive Period, upon the effective date of such Change in Control, the term of this Plan shall automatically and irrevocably be renewed for a period of twenty-four (24) full calendar months from the effective date of such Change in Control. This Plan shall thereafter automatically terminate following the twenty-four (24) month Change in Control renewal period. Further, this Plan shall be assigned to, and shall be assumed by the purchaser in such Change in Control, as further provided in Article 7 herein.

1

Article 2. Definitions

Wherever used in this Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below and, when the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the word is capitalized:

(a) " Plan " means this Boyd Gaming Corporation Change-in-Control Severance Plan for Tier I, II and III Executives.

(b) "Affiliate" and "Associate" shall have the same meaning ascribed to such terms in Rule 12b-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act.

(c) " Base Salary " means, at any time, the then regular annual rate of pay which the Executive is receiving as annual salary, excluding amounts: (i) received under short-term or long-term incentive or other bonus plans, regardless of whether or not the amounts are deferred, or (ii) designated by the Company as payment toward reimbursement of expenses.

(d) " Beneficial Owner " or " Beneficial Ownership " shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act.

(e) " Board " or "Board of Directors " means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(f) "Boyd Family" shall mean William S. Boyd, his spouse, any direct descendant or spouse of such descendant, or any direct descendent of such spouse, and any trust or estate in which each person who has a current beneficial income interest, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, in capital stock of the Company is one of the foregoing persons. The members of the Boyd Family shall be deemed to beneficially own any capital stock of a corporation held by any other corporation (the "parent corporation") so long as the members of the Boyd Family beneficially own, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, in the aggregate fifty percent (50%) or more of the total voting power of the capital stock of the parent corporation.

(g) " Cause " shall mean the occurrence of any one or more of the following:

(i) The Executive's willful failure to substantially perform his duties with the Company (other than any such failure resulting from the Executive's Disability), after a written demand from the Committee for substantial performance is delivered to the Executive that specifically identifies the manner in which the Committee believes that the Executive has not substantially performed his duties and the Executive has failed to remedy the situation within fifteen (15) business days of such written notice from the Committee;

(ii) Gross negligence in the performance of the Executive's duties;

(iii) The Executive's conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere , to any felony, whatsoever, or any other crime involving the personal enrichment of the Executive at the expense of the Company;

2

(iv) The Executive's willful engagement in conduct that is demonstrably and materially injurious to the Company, monetarily or otherwise;

(v) Willful violation of any provision of the Company's code of conduct; or

(vi) Willful violation of any of the covenants contained in Article 4, as applicable, after written notice is delivered to the Executive that specifically identifies the violation and the Executive has failed to remedy the situation within fifteen (15) business days of such written notice from the Committee.

(h) " Change in Control " shall occur if any of the following events occur:

(i) the direct or indirect acquisition by any person or related group of persons (other than an acquisition from or by the Company, by a Company-sponsored employee benefit plan or by a person that directly or indirectly controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the Company or a Permitted Holder) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act) of securities possessing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting combined voting power of the Company's outstanding securities; or

(ii) a change in the composition of the Board over a period of thirty-six (36) months or less such that a majority of the Board members (rounded up to the next whole number) ceases, by reason of one or more contested elections for Board membership, to be comprised of individuals who are Continuing Directors.

(i) " Code " means the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

(j) " Committee " means any committee appointed by the Board to administer this Plan.

(k) " Company " means Boyd Gaming Corporation, a Nevada corporation, and any successor thereto as provided in Article 7 herein.

(l) " Continuing Directors " means members of the Board who either (i) have been Board members continuously for a period of at least thirty-six (36) months or (ii) have been Board members for less than thirty-six (36) months and were elected or nominated for election as Board members by at least a majority of the Board members described in clause (i) who were still in office at the time such election or nomination was approved by the Board.

(m) " Disability " or " Disabled " means a permanent and total disability determined in accordance with uniformity and nondiscrimination standards adopted by the Committee from time to time.

(n) " Effective Date of Termination " means the date on which a Qualifying Termination occurs, as provided in Section 3.2 herein, which triggers the payment of Severance Benefits hereunder.

3

(o) " Exchange Act " means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, or any successor act thereto.

(p) " Good Reason " means, without the Executive's express written consent, the occurrence after a Change in Control of the Company of any one (1) or more of the following:

(i) The Company's requiring the Executive to be based at a location in excess of fifty (50) miles from the location of the Executive's principal job location or office immediately prior to the Change in Control; except for required travel on the Company's business to an extent substantially consistent with the Executive's then present business travel obligations;

(ii) A reduction by the Company of the Executive's Base Salary in effect on the Effective Date hereof, or as the same shall be increased from time to time;

(iii) The failure of the Company to obtain a satisfactory agreement from any successor to the Company to assume and agree to perform the Company's obligations under this Plan, as contemplated in Article 7 herein, unless the assignment occurs by operation of law;

(iv) A material breach of this Plan by the Company which is not remedied by the Company within ten (10) business days of receipt of written notice of such breach delivered by the Executive to the Company; and

(v) A change in the Executive's status, title, position or responsibilities (including reporting responsibilities) which, in the Executive's reasonable judgment, represents an adverse change from the Executive's status, title, position or responsibilities as in effect at any time within ninety (90) days preceding the date of a Change in Control or at any time thereafter; the assignment to the Executive of any duties or responsibilities which, in the Executive's reasonable judgment, are inconsistent with the Executive's status, title, position or responsibilities as in effect at any time within ninety (90) days preceding the date of a Change in Control or at any time thereafter; or any removal of the Executive from or failure to reappoint or reelect the Executive to any of such offices or positions, except in connection with the termination of the Executive's employment for Disability, Cause, as a result of the Executive's death or by the Executive.

Unless the Executive becomes Disabled, the Executive's right to terminate employment for Good Reason shall not be affected by the Executive's incapacity due to physical or mental illness. The Executive's continued employment shall not constitute consent to, or a waiver of rights with respect to, any circumstance constituting Good Reason herein.

(q) " Notice of Termination " shall mean a written notice which shall indicate the specific termination provision in this Plan relied upon, and shall set forth in reasonable detail the facts and circumstances claimed to provide a basis for termination of the Executive's employment under the provision so indicated.

4

(r) "Permitted Holder" means the Boyd Family and any "group" (as defined in Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) comprised solely of members of the Boyd Family.

(s) " Person " shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act and used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) thereof, including a "group" as defined in Section 13(d).

(t) " Qualifying Termination " means any of the events described in Section 3.2 herein, the occurrence of which triggers the payment of Severance Benefits hereunder.

(u) "Separation from Service" shall have the same meaning as proscribed in Code Section 409A and the regulations thereunder and "Separates from Service" shall mean the occurrence of a Separation from Service.

(u) " Severance Benefits " means the severance benefits as provided in Section 3.3(a) through 3.3(e) herein.

(v) "Specified Employee" means as of the date of Separation from Service, a specified employee as defined Code Section 409A and the regulations thereunder.

Article 3. Severance Benefits

3.1 Right to Severance Benefits . The Executive shall be entitled to receive from the Company Severance Benefits as described in Section 3.3 herein, if during the term of this Plan there has been a Change in Control of the Company and if, within twenty-four (24) calendar months thereafter, the Executive's employment with the Company shall end for any reason specified in Section 3.2 herein as being a Qualifying Termination. For any Executive who is not a Specified Employee, the Severance Benefits described in Section 3.3(a), 3.3(b), 3.3(c) and 3.3(e) herein shall be paid in cash to the Executive in a single lump sum as soon as practicable following the date of Qualifying Termination, but, in no event later than thirty (30) calendar days from such date. For Specified Employees, the Severance Benefits described in Section 3.3(a), 3.3(b), 3.3(c) and 3.3(e) herein shall be paid in cash in a single lump sum as soon as administratively practicable on a date on or after the date six (6) months following the date of Qualifying Termination.

3.2 Qualifying Termination . The occurrence of any one or more of the following events (a "Qualifying Termination") within twenty-four (24) calendar months immediately following a Change in Control of the Company shall trigger the payment of Severance Benefits to the Executive, as such benefits are described under Section 3.3 herein:

(a) The Company's involuntary termination of the Executive's employment without Cause; or

(b) The Executive's voluntary termination of employment for Good Reason.

A Qualifying Termination shall also include an involuntary termination of the Executive's employment without Cause by the Company within six (6) months prior to a Change in Control if such termination occurs in connection with, and at the request of any third party involved in, the Change-in-Control transaction. In any such event, the date of Qualifying Termination shall be

5

deemed to be the date of the Change in Control. A Qualifying Termination shall not include a termination of the Executive's employment within twenty-four (24) calendar months after a Change in Control by reason of death, Disability, the Executive's voluntary termination without Good Reason, or the Company's involuntary termination of the Executive's employment for Cause.

3.3 Description of Severance Benefits . In the event that the Executive becomes entitled to receive Severance Benefits, as provided in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 herein, subject to Section 3.3(f), and if the Executive signs a General Release in a form generally acceptable to the Company that releases the Company and its Affiliates from any and all claims the Executive may have against them and which also certifies the Executive's willingness to comply with Article 4 of this Plan, the Company shall pay to the Executive and provide the Executive with the following:

(a) A lump-sum cash amount equal to the Executive's unpaid Base Salary, accrued vacation pay, unreimbursed business expenses, and all other items earned by and owed to the Executive through and including the date of the Qualifying Termination.

(b) A lump-sum cash amount equal to the sum of:

(i) For Tier One Executives-three (3)

(ii) For Tier Two Executives-two (2)

(iii) For Tier Three Executives-one (1)

multiplied by: (a) the Executive's annual rate of Base Salary in effect immediately prior to the occurrence of the Change in Control, or, if greater, upon the occurrence of the Qualifying Termination, plus (b) the Executive's then-current target bonus opportunity established under the annual bonus plan in effect immediately prior to the occurrence of the Change in Control, or, if greater, the average of the Executive's actual bonus for the three (3) fiscal years immediately prior to the Change in Control, or, if greater, the target bonus in effect upon the occurrence of the Qualifying Termination.

(c) A lump-sum cash amount equal to the greater of: (i) the Executive's then-current target bonus opportunity established under the annual bonus plan for the plan year in which the Executive's date of Qualifying Termination occurs; or (ii) the Executive's target bonus opportunity in effect prior to the occurrence of the Change in Control. Such lump such cash amount, as determined under (i) or (ii) immediately above, shall be adjusted on a pro rata basis based on the number of days the Executive was actually employed during such plan year. Such payment shall constitute full satisfaction for these amounts owed to the Executive.

(d) All outstanding equity-based long-term incentive vehicles, including but not limited to stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, or restricted stock units granted subsequent to July 19, 2006 ("Equity Awards") shall become immediately vested in full upon a Qualifying Termination. In the event such

6

Equity Awards would not otherwise vest solely by the continued employment of the Executive ("Performance Vesting Equity Awards"), such Performance Vesting Awards shall vest at the time of the Change in Control. The number of shares that shall vest shall be determined as if a level of performance equal to 100% of target had been achieved and shall be prorated based on the length of time within the performance period elapsed prior to the Change in Control.

(e) A lump-sum cash payment equal to the total monthly premiums that would have been paid by Company for the Executive under the health insurance plan (or in the case of a self-funded plan, the cost of COBRA continuation coverage) for

(i) Tier One Executives-thirty-six (36)

(ii) Tier Two Executives-twenty-four (24)

(iii) Tier Three Executive-twelve (12)

months from the date of the Qualifying Termination.

In addition, the Company shall provide Executive with an additional payment in the amount necessary such that after payment by the Executive of all such taxes (calculated after assuming the Executive pays such taxes for the year in which the payment or benefit occurs at the highest marginal tax rate applicable), including the taxes imposed on the additional payments, the Executive effectively received coverage on a tax free basis or retains a cash amount equal to the health insurance cash payments provided pursuant to this Section 3.3(e).

(f) Subject to Article 5, the Severance Benefits payable to any Executive under this Section 3.3 shall be adjusted as set forth in this Section 3.3(f). If the sum (the "combined amount") of the lump sum amount under Section 3.3 and all other payments or benefits which the Executive has received or has the right to receive from the Company which are defined in Section 280G(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Code would constitute a "parachute payment" (as defined in Section 280G(b)(2) of the Code), the combined amount shall, unless the following sentence applies, be decreased by the smallest amount that will eliminate any parachute payment. For Tier I and Tier II Executives only, if the decrease referred to in the preceding sentence is 10 percent (10%) or more of the combined amount, the combined amount shall not be decreased, but rather shall be increased by an amount sufficient to provide the Executive, after tax, a net amount equal to the Code Section 4999 excise tax imposed on such combined amount, as increased pursuant to this section. For this purpose, "after tax" means the amount retained by the Executive after satisfaction (whether through withholding, direct payment or otherwise) of all applicable federal, state, provincial and local income taxes at the highest marginal tax rate, and the Executive share of any applicable FICA taxes.

3.4 Termination for Total and Permanent Disability . Following a Change in Control, if the Executive's employment is terminated with the Company due to Disability, the Company shall

7

pay the Executive all amounts described in Section 3.3(a) herein through the Effective Date of Termination. All other benefits due Executive shall be determined in accordance with the Company's retirement, insurance, and other applicable plans and programs then in effect.

3.5 Termination Due to Death . Following a Change in Control, if the Executive's employment with the Company is terminated by reason of death, the Company shall pay the Executive's estate all amounts described in Section 3.3(a) herein through the Effective Date of Termination. All other benefits due Executive shall be determined in accordance with the Company's retirement, survivor's benefits, insurance, and other applicable programs then in effect.

3.6 Termination for Cause or by the Executive Other Than for Good Reason . Following a Change in Control, if the Executive's employment is terminated either: (a) by the Company for Cause; or (b) voluntarily by the Executive without Good Reason, the Company shall pay the Executive all amounts described in Section 3.3(a) herein through the Effective Date of Termination, plus all other amounts to which the Executive is entitled under any compensation plans of the Company at the time such payments are due, and the Company shall have no further obligations to the Executive under this Plan.

3.7 Notice of Termination . Any termination of the Executive's employment by the Company for Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason shall be communicated by Notice of Termination to the other party.

Article 4. Noncompetition and Confidentiality

During the term of this Plan, the following shall apply:

(a) Confidentiality . The Company has advised the Executive and the Executive acknowledges that it is the policy of the Company to maintain as secret and confidential all Protected Information (as defined below), and that Protected Information has been and will be developed at substantial cost and effort to the Company. All Protected Information shall remain confidential permanently, and the Executive shall not, at any time, directly or indirectly, divulge, furnish, or make accessible to any person, firm, corporation, association, or other entity (otherwise than as may be required in the regular course of the Executive's employment with the Company), nor use in any manner, either during the term of employment or after termination, at any time, for any reason, any Protected Information, or cause any such information of the Company to enter the public domain.

For purposes of this Plan, "Protected Information" means trade secrets, confidential and proprietary business information of the Company, and any other information of the Company, including, but not limited to, customer lists (including potential customers), sources of supply, processes, plans, materials, pricing information, internal memoranda, marketing plans, internal policies, and products and services which may be developed from time to time by the Company and its agents or employees, including the Executive; provided, however, that information that is in the public domain (other than as a result of a breach of this Plan), approved for release by the Company or lawfully obtained from third parties who are not bound by a confidentiality agreement with the Company, is not Protected Information.

8

(b) Nonsolicitation . During the term of this Plan and for a period of 6 months after the Effective Date of Termination, the Executive shall not employ or retain or solicit for employment or arrange to have any other person, firm, or other entity employ or retain or solicit for employment or otherwise participate in the employment or retention of any person who is an employee or consultant of the Company.

(c) Cooperation . Executive agrees to cooperate with the Company and its attorneys in connection with any and all lawsuits, claims, investigations, or similar proceedings that have been or could be asserted at any time arising out of or related in any way to Executive's employment by the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

(d) Nondisparagement . At all times, the Executive agrees not to disparage the Company or otherwise make comments harmful to the Company's reputation.

Article 5. Excise Taxes

5.1 Excise Tax Treatment . If an Executive becomes entitled to a Gross-Up Payment as provided in Section 3.3(f), the Company shall pay the Gross-Up Payment. For any Executive who is not a Specified Employee, the Company shall pay the Gross-Up Payment as soon as administratively practicable, but not later than March 15 in the calendar year following the Executive's date of Qualifying Termination. For Specified Employees, the Company shall pay the Gross-Up Payment as soon as administratively practicable on a date on or after the date six (6) months following the date of Qualifying Termination.

5.2 Tax Computation . In determining the potential impact of the Excise Tax, the Company may rely on any advice it deems appropriate, including, but not limited to, Company counsel or the Company's independent auditors. All calculations for purposes of determining whether any of the combined amount will be subject to the Excise Tax and the amounts of such Excise Tax will be made in accordance with applicable rules and regulations under Section 280G of the Code in effect at the relevant time.

For purposes of determining the amount of the Gross-Up Payment, the Participant shall be deemed to pay federal income taxes at the highest marginal rate of federal income taxation in the calendar year in which the Gross-Up Payment is to be made, and state and local income taxes at the highest marginal rate of taxation in the state and locality of the Participant's residence on the date of termination of employment, net of the maximum reduction in federal income taxes which could be obtained from deduction of such state and local taxes ignoring any loss of deduction attributable to the application of federal or state alternative minimum tax.

5.3 Subsequent Recalculation . If the Internal Revenue Service adjusts the computation of the Company so that the Executive did not receive the greatest net benefit, the Company shall reimburse the Executive for the full amount necessary to make the Executive whole, as reasonably determined by the Committee. For Specified Employees, such reimbursement shall be made as soon as administratively practicable but not sooner than as soon as administratively practicable on a date on or after the date six (6) months following the date of Qualifying Termination, and for Executives who are not Specified Employees, such reimbursement shall be made as soon as administratively practicable but not later than March 15 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the Internal Revenue Service adjusts the Executive's computation. If the Internal Revenue Service

9

adjusts the computation such that the Company has exceeded has the maximum amount for as provided, then the amount paid in excess shall be paid back to the Company.

If, after the receipt by the Executive of an amount advanced by the Company pursuant to this Article 5, the Executive who becomes entitled to receive any refund with respect to such claim due to an overpayment of any Excise Tax or income tax, including interest and penalties with respect thereto, the Executive shall (subject to the Company's complying with the requirements of this Section 5.3) promptly pay to the Company the amount of such refund (together with any interest paid or credited thereon after taxes applicable thereto).

Article 6. Contractual Rights and Legal Remedies

6.1 Payment Obligations Absolute . The Company's obligation to make the payments and the arrangements provided for herein shall be absolute and unconditional, and shall not be affected by any circumstances including, without limitation, any offset, counterclaim, recoupment, defense, or other right which the Company may have against the Executive or anyone else. All amounts payable by the Company hereunder shall be paid without notice or demand.

The Executive shall not be obligated to seek other employment in mitigation of the amounts payable or arrangements made under any provision of this Plan, and the obtaining of any such other employment shall in no event effect any reduction of the Company's obligations to make the payments and arrangements required to be made under this Plan, except to the extent provided in Section 3.3(f) herein.

6.2 Contractual Rights to Benefits . This Plan establishes and vests in the Executive a contractual right to the benefits to which he is entitled hereunder. However, nothing herein contained shall require or be deemed to require, or prohibit or be deemed to prohibit, the Company to segregate, earmark, or otherwise set aside any funds or other assets, in trust or otherwise, to provide for any payments to be made or required hereunder.

6.3 Arbitration . The Executive shall have the right and option to elect (in lieu of litigation) to have any dispute, claim or controversy arising under or in connection with this Plan settled by arbitration, conducted before a panel of three (3) arbitrators sitting in a location selected by the Executive within fifty (50) miles from the location of his or her job with the Company, in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association then in effect. The Executive's election to arbitrate, as herein provided, and the decision of the arbitrators in that proceeding, shall be binding on the Company and the Executive. Judgment may be entered on the award of the arbitrator in any court having jurisdiction.

6.4 Legal Fees and Expenses . The Company shall pay all reasonable legal fees, costs of litigation, costs of arbitration, prejudgment interest, and other expenses which are incurred in good faith by the Executive as a result of the Company's refusal to provide the benefits to which the Executive becomes entitled under this Plan, or as a result of the Company's (or any third party's) contesting the validity, enforceability, or interpretation of the Plan, or as a result of any conflict between the parties pertaining to this Plan; provided, however, that if the court (or arbitration panel, as applicable) determines that the Executive's claims were arbitrary and capricious, the Company shall have no obligation hereunder.

10

Article 7. Successors

7.1 Successors to the Company . The Company shall require any successor (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, reorganization, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, liquidation, or otherwise) of all or a significant portion of the assets of the Company by agreement, in form and substance satisfactory to the Executive, to expressly assume and agree to perform this Plan in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform if no such succession had taken place. Regardless of whether an agreement is executed, this Plan shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of any successor in accordance with the operation of law and such successor shall be deemed the "Company" for purposes of this Plan.

7.2 Assignment by the Executive . No rights hereunder shall be assignable or transferable by the Executive except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. This Plan shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Executive's personal or legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, heirs, distributees, devisees, and legatees. If the Executive dies while any amount would still be payable to him hereunder had he continued to live, all such amounts, unless otherwise provided herein, shall be paid in accordance with the terms of this Plan to the Executive's devisee, legatee, or other designee, or if there is no such designee, to the Executive's estate.

Article 8. Miscellaneous

8.1 Employment Status . This Plan is not, and nothing herein shall be deemed to create, an employment contract between the Executive and the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The Executive acknowledges that the rights of the Company remain wholly intact to change or reduce at any time and from time to time his compensation, title, responsibilities, location, and all other aspects of the employment relationship, or to discharge him prior to a Change in Control (subject to such discharge possibly being considered a Qualifying Termination pursuant to Section 3.2).

8.2 Entire Plan . This Plan contains the entire understanding of the Company and the Executive with respect to the subject matter hereof. In addition, the payments provided for under this Plan in the event of the Executive's termination of employment shall be in lieu of any severance benefits payable under any severance plan, program, or policy of the Company to which the Executive might otherwise be entitled.

8.3 Notices . All notices, requests, demands, and other communications hereunder shall be sufficient if in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered by hand, courier or if sent by registered or certified mail to the Executive at the last address he has filed in writing with the Company or, in the case of the Company, at its principal offices.

8.4 Conflicting Plans . This Plan supersedes any and all prior change-in-control agreements or understandings, oral or written, entered into by and between the Company and the Executive, with respect to the subject matter hereof, and all amendments thereto, in their entirety; provided that it shall not amend the terms of existing compensatory plans qualified under Section 162(m) of the Code or equity compensation plans or awards granted thereunder prior to the date hereto. Further, the Executive hereby represents and warrants to the Company that his entering into this Plan, and the obligations and duties undertaken by him hereunder, will not conflict with, constitute a breach of, or otherwise violate the terms of, any other employment or other agreement to which he is a party, except to the extent any such conflict, breach, or violation under any such agreement has been disclosed to the Board in writing in advance of the signing of this Plan.

11

8.5 Includable Compensation . Severance Benefits provided hereunder shall not be considered "includable compensation" for purposes of determining the Executive's benefits under any other plan or program of the Company unless otherwise provided by such other plan or program.

8.6 Tax Withholding . The Company shall withhold from any amounts payable under this Plan all federal, state, city, or other taxes as legally required to be withheld.

8.7 Internal Revenue Code Section 409A . The Company may amend or modify the Plan in any manner in order to meet the requirements of Section 409A of the Code as amplified by any Internal Revenue Service or U.S. Treasury Department guidance. In addition, the Company shall, to the extent necessary and only to the extent necessary, modify the timing of delivery of Severance Benefits if it is determined that the timing would subject the Severance Benefits to the additional tax and/or interest assessed under Code Section 409A. In such event, such payments shall occur as soon as practicable without causing such payment to trigger tax penalty under Code Section 409A.

8.8 Severability . In the event any provision of this Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of the Plan, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included. Further, the captions of this Plan are not part of the provisions hereof and shall have no force and effect.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Plan to the contrary, the Company shall have no obligation to make any payment to the Executive hereunder to the extent, but only to the extent, that such payment is prohibited by the terms of any final order of a federal or state court or regulatory agency of competent jurisdiction; provided, however, that such an order shall not affect, impair, or invalidate any provision of this Plan not expressly subject to such order.

8.9 Modification . No provision of this Plan may be modified, waived, or discharged unless such modification, waiver, or discharge is agreed to in writing and signed by the applicable Executive and the Company, or by the respective parties' legal representatives or successors. No waiver by any party hereto of, or compliance with, any condition or provision of this Plan to be performed by another party shall be deemed a waiver of similar or disseminate provisions or conditions at the same or any subsequent time.

8.10 Gender and Number. Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term used herein shall include the feminine; the plural shall include the singular and the singular shall include the plural.

8.11 Applicable Law . To the extent not preempted by the laws of the United States, the laws of Nevada shall be the controlling law in all matters relating to this Plan without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws.

12

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Plan on this _______________ day of ________________, 2006.

ATTEST

Boyd Gaming Corporation

___________________________

By: ________________________,
[Title]

 

 

 

 








Appendix

Tier I

CEO

Tier II

Management Committee, other than the CEO

Tier III

Senior Vice Presidents and General Managers, other than the Management Committee, and such other key executives as may be designated by senior management








Exhibit 10.47

Summary of Ellis Landau Severance Arrangements

In connection with Ellis Landau's retirement from his position of Chief Financial Officer of Boyd Gaming Corporation (the "Company") on May 31, 2006, the Company and Mr. Landau entered into the following arrangements:

  • Mr. Landau to remain as an employee of the Company through January 9, 2007.
  • Mr. Landau to receive his regular base salary through December 31, 2006; from December 31, 2006 through January 9, 2007, Mr. Landau to receive a pro rated salary at $10,000 per month.
  • Short-term bonus for 2006 - at target, payout is 40% of base salary and the maximum is 80% of base salary; all appropriate formulas apply. No short-term bonus for any period after December 31, 2006.
  • Long-term incentive plan:
    • Three years ended December 31, 2006 - paid in 2007 if conditions for payment are satisfied; target is $250,000; all appropriate formulas apply.
    • Three years ended December 31, 2007 - paid in 2008 if conditions for payment are satisfied; 2/3 of payment that would normally be paid using all appropriate formulas; target is $250,000.
    • Three years ended December 31, 2008 - paid in 2009 if conditions for payment are satisfied; 1/3 of payment that would normally be paid using all appropriate formulas; target is $425,000.
  • Stock Options:
    • Normal vesting through December 31, 2006.
    • Any options that are unvested on December 31, 2006 that are scheduled to vest prior to December 31, 2007, shall become immediately vested on December 31, 2006.
    • Any options that are unvested on December 31, 2006 that are scheduled to vest after December 31, 2007, shall expire on December 31, 2006.
    • Exercise period for all vested but unexercised options extended to the full extent permitted by Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.
  • Career Shares:
    • On January 3, 2007, Mr. Landau was granted 1,795 restricted stock units under the Company's 2002 Stock Incentive Plan pursuant to the Company's Career Shares Program; 50% of the restricted stock units vested upon his termination.







Exhibit 21.1

BOYD GAMING CORPORATION

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES:

California Hotel and Casino
d.b.a. California Hotel and Casino
d.b.a. Sam's Town Hotel, Gambling Hall and Bowling Center
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Nevada
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 88-0121743

Boyd Tunica, Inc.
d.b.a. Sam's Town Hotel and Gambling Hall
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Mississippi
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 64-0829658

Boyd Kenner, Inc.
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Louisiana
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 88-0319489

Mare-Bear, Inc.
d.b.a. Stardust Resort and Casino
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Nevada
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 88-0203692

Sam-Will, Inc.
d.b.a. Fremont Hotel and Casino
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Nevada
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 88-0203673

Eldorado, Inc.
d.b.a. Eldorado Casino
d.b.a. Jokers Wild Casino
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Nevada
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 88-0093922

MSW, Inc.
d.b.a. Main Street Station Hotel, Casino and Brewery
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Nevada
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 88-0310765

Par-A-Dice Gaming Corporation
d.b.a. Par-A-Dice Hotel Casino
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Illinois
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 37-1268902

Boyd Louisiana L.L.C.
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Nevada
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 86-0880651

Treasure Chest Casino, LLC.
d.b.a. Treasure Chest Casino
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Louisiana
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 72-1248550

Blue Chip Casino, LLC.
d.b.a. Blue Chip Hotel and Casino
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Indiana
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 35-2087676

Boyd Atlantic City, Inc.
(State of Incorporation or Organization) New Jersey
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 93-1221994

California Hotel Finance Co.
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Nevada
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 88-0217850

Boyd Louisiana Racing, Inc.
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Louisiana
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 88-0494602

Boyd Racing, L.L.C.
d.b.a. Delta Downs Racetrack Casino & Hotel
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Louisiana
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 91-2121472

Coast Casinos, Inc.
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Nevada
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 20-0836222

Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc.
d.b.a. Barbary Coast Hotel and Casino
d.b.a. Gold Coast Hotel and Casino
d.b.a. The Orleans Hotel and Casino
d.b.a. Suncoast Hotel and Casino
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Nevada
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 88-0345706

Boyd Shreveport, L.L.C.
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Louisiana
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 20-0635765

Boyd Red River, L.L.C.
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Louisiana
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 20-0635770

Red River Entertainment of Shreveport Partnership in Commendam
d.b.a. Sam's Town Hotel and Casino
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Louisiana
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 20-0753582

Boyd Pennsylvania, Inc.
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Pennsylvania
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 51-0559543

Boyd Pennsylvania Partners, LP
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Pennsylvania
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 20-3944905

Echelon Resorts Corporation
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Nevada
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 32-0163131

Echelon Resorts LLC
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Nevada
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 30-0346702

Boyd Florida LL
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Mississippi
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 35-2271901

FGB Development, Inc
(State of Incorporation or Organization) Florida
(IRS Employer Identification Number) 20-2310247








Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-17941, 333-79895, 333-68130, 333-90840, 333-119850, and 333-129421 on Form S-8 and No. 333-130404 on Form S-3ASR of our reports dated February 28, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Boyd Gaming Corporation and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption in 2006 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, and the adoption in 2005 of EITF D-108 , Use of the Residual Method to Value Acquired Assets Other Than Goodwill) , and management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Boyd Gaming Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
February 28, 2007








Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-17941, 333-79895, 333-68130, 333-90840, 333-119850, and 333-129421 on Form S-8 and 333-130404 on Form S-3ASR of our reports dated February 27, 2007 relating to the financial statements of Marina District Development Company, LLC and subsidiary appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Boyd Gaming Corporation and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006.

DELOITTE AND TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, New Jerse
February 27, 2007








Exhibit 31.1

BOYD GAMING CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

I, William S. Boyd, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Boyd Gaming Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 28, 2007

/ S /     W ILLIAM S. B OYD  


William S. Boyd
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer








Exhibit 31.2

BOYD GAMING CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

I, Paul J. Chakmak, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Boyd Gaming Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 28, 2007

/ S /     P AUL J. C HAKMAK  


Paul J. Chakmak
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer








Exhibit 32.1

BOYD GAMING CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Boyd Gaming Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William S. Boyd, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: February 28, 2007

/ S /     W ILLIAM S. B OYD  


William S. Boyd
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer








Exhibit 32.2

BOYD GAMING CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Boyd Gaming Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Paul J. Chakmak, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: February 28, 2007

/ S /     P AUL J. C HAKMAK  


Paul J. Chakmak
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer








Exhibit 99.1

GOVERNMENTAL GAMING REGULATIONS

We are subject to extensive regulation under laws, rules and supervisory procedures primarily in the jurisdictions where our facilities are located or docked. If additional gaming regulations are adopted in a jurisdiction in which we operate, such regulations could impose restrictions or costs that could have a significant adverse effect on us. From time to time, various proposals have been introduced in the legislatures of some of the jurisdictions in which we have existing or planned operations that, if enacted, could adversely affect the tax, regulatory, operational or other aspects of the gaming industry and us. We do not know whether such legislation will be enacted. The federal government has also previously considered a federal tax on casino revenues and the elimination of betting on amateur sporting events and may consider such a tax or eliminations on betting in the future. In addition, gaming companies are currently subject to significant state and local taxes and fees in addition to normal federal and state corporate income taxes, and such taxes and fees are subject to increase at any time. Any material increase in these taxes or fees could adversely affect us.

Some jurisdictions, including Nevada, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi and New Jersey, empower their regulators to investigate participation by licensees in gaming outside their jurisdiction and require access to periodic reports respecting those gaming activities. Violations of laws in one jurisdiction could result in disciplinary action in other jurisdictions.

Under provisions of gaming laws in jurisdictions in which we have operations, and under our organizational documents, certain of our securities are subject to restrictions on ownership which may be imposed by specified governmental authorities. The restrictions may require a holder of our securities to dispose of the securities or, if the holder refuses, or is unable, to dispose of the securities, we may be required to repurchase the securities.

The indenture governing our outstanding notes provides that if a holder of a note or beneficial owner of a note is required to be licensed, qualified or found suitable under the applicable gaming laws and is not so licensed, qualified or found suitable within any time period specified by the applicable gaming authority, the holder will be required, at our request, to dispose of its notes within a time period that either we prescribe or such other time period prescribed by the applicable gaming authority, and thereafter, we shall have the right to redeem such holder's notes.

Nevada

The ownership and operation of casino gaming facilities in Nevada are subject to the Nevada Gaming Control Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder, which we refer to as the Nevada Act, and various local codes and ordinances. Our gaming operations are subject to the licensing and regulatory control of the Nevada Gaming Commission, which we refer to as the Nevada Commission, the Nevada State Gaming Control Board, which we refer to as the Nevada Board, and the Clark County Liquor and Gaming Licensing Board, which, with the Nevada Commission and the Nevada Board, we collectively refer to as the Nevada Gaming Authorities.

The laws, regulations and supervisory procedures of the Nevada Gaming Authorities are based upon declarations of public policy which are concerned with, among other things:

  • the prevention of unsavory or unsuitable persons from having a direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity;
  • the establishment and maintenance of responsible accounting practices and procedures;
  • the maintenance of effective controls over the financial practices of licensees, including establishing minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets and revenues;
  • providing reliable record keeping and requiring the filing of periodic reports with the Nevada Gaming Authorities;
  • the prevention of cheating and fraudulent practices;
  • the maintenance of a Gaming Compliance and Reporting Plan, including the establishment of a Gaming Compliance Committee and the retention of a Compliance Officer; and
  • the provision of a source of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees.

Changes in such laws, regulations and procedures could have an adverse effect on our gaming operations and our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Corporations that operate casinos in Nevada are required to be licensed by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. A gaming license requires the periodic payment of fees and taxes and is not transferable. We are registered by the Nevada Commission as a publicly traded corporation, or a Registered Corporation. As a Registered Corporation, we are required periodically to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission and furnish any other information which the Nevada Commission may require. We have been found suitable by the Nevada Commission to own the stock of California Hotel and Casino and of Coast Casinos, Inc., or Coast Casinos. California Hotel and Casino is licensed by the Nevada Commission to operate non-restricted gaming activities at the California and Sam's Town Las Vegas and is additionally registered as a holding corporation and approved by the Nevada Gaming Authorities to own the stock of Mare-Bear, Inc., the operator of the Stardust, Sam-Will, Inc., the operator of the Fremont, Eldorado, Inc., the operator of the Eldorado and Jokers Wild, and M.S.W., Inc., the operator of Main Street Station. Coast Casinos is registered as a holding company and approved by the Nevada Gaming Authorities to own the stock of Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc., the operator of Gold Coast Hotel and Casino, Barbary Coast Hotel and Casino, The Orleans Hotel and Casino, Suncoast Hotel and Casino, South Coast Hotel and Casino and Renata's Supper Club. In 2003, the Nevada Commission approved Boyd Louisiana Racing Inc. and Boyd Racing L.L.C., d.b.a. Delta Downs Racetrack, Casino & Hotel, to share in the revenue from the conduct of off-track pari-mutuel wagering, under certain conditions, as it pertains to the broadcast of live racing events to licensed Nevada pari-mutuel race books. No person may become a stockholder of, or receive any percentage of profits from, California Hotel and Casino or its subsidiaries or of Coast Casinos or its subsidiary without first obtaining licenses and approvals from the Nevada Gaming Authorities (all of the foregoing entities are collectively referred to as the "Licensed Subsidiaries"). Boyd Gaming and all of its Licensed Subsidiaries have obtained from the Nevada Gaming Authorities the various registrations, approvals, permits and licenses required in order to engage in gaming activities in Nevada.

The Nevada Gaming Authorities may investigate any individual who has a material relationship to, or material involvement with, Boyd Gaming and its Licensed Subsidiaries in order to determine whether such individual is suitable or should be licensed as a business associate of a gaming licensee. Officers, directors and certain key employees of the Licensed Subsidiaries must file applications with the Nevada Gaming Authorities and may be required to be licensed or found suitable by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. Our officers, directors and key employees who are actively and directly involved in gaming activities of the Licensed Subsidiaries may be required to be licensed or found suitable by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The Nevada Gaming Authorities may deny an application for licensing for any cause which they deem reasonable. A finding of suitability is comparable to licensing, and both require submission of detailed personal and financial information followed by a thorough investigation. The applicant for licensing or a finding of suitability must pay all the costs of the investigation. Changes in licensed positions must be reported to the Nevada Gaming Authorities and, in addition to their authority to deny an application for a finding of suitability or licensure, the Nevada Gaming Authorities have jurisdiction to disapprove a change in a corporate position.

If the Nevada Gaming Authorities were to find an officer, director or key employee unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to continue having a relationship with us or any of our Licensed Subsidiaries, the companies involved would have to sever all relationships with such person. In addition, the Nevada Commission may require Boyd Gaming or any of its Licensed Subsidiaries to terminate the employment of any person who refuses to file appropriate applications. Determinations of suitability or of questions pertaining to licensing are not subject to judicial review in Nevada.

Boyd Gaming and its Licensed Subsidiaries are required to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission. Substantially all material loans, leases, sales of securities and similar financing transactions by the Licensed Subsidiaries must be reported to, or approved by, the Nevada Commission.

If it were determined that the Nevada Act was violated by any of the Licensed Subsidiaries, the gaming licenses they hold could be limited, conditioned, suspended or revoked, subject to compliance with certain statutory and regulatory procedures. In addition, Boyd Gaming and the persons involved could be subject to substantial fines for each separate violation of the Nevada Act or Regulations at the discretion of the Nevada Commission. Further, a supervisor could be nominated by the Nevada Commission for court appointment to operate our gaming properties and, under certain circumstances, earnings generated during the supervisor's appointment (except for reasonable rental value of our gaming properties) could be forfeited to the State of Nevada. Limitation, conditioning or suspension of any gaming license or the appointment of a supervisor could (and revocation of any gaming license would) materially adversely affect our gaming operations and our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Any beneficial holder of our voting securities, regardless of the number of shares owned, may be required to file an application, be investigated and have his suitability as a beneficial holder of our voting securities determined if the Nevada Commission has reason to believe that such ownership would otherwise be inconsistent with the declared policies of the State of Nevada. The applicant must pay all costs of investigation incurred by the Nevada Gaming Authorities in conducting any such investigation.

The Nevada Act requires any person who acquires more than 5% of our voting securities to report the acquisition to the Nevada Commission. The Nevada Act requires that beneficial owners of more than 10% of our voting securities apply to the Nevada Commission for a finding of suitability within 30 days after the Chairman of the Nevada Board mails the written notice requiring such filing. Under certain circumstances, an "institutional investor," as defined in the Nevada Act, which acquires more than 10%, but not more than 15%, of our voting securities may apply to the Nevada Commission for a waiver of such finding of suitability if such institutional investor holds the voting securities for investment purposes only. An institutional investor shall not be deemed to hold voting securities for investment purposes unless the voting securities were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business as an institutional investor and not for the purpose of causing, directly or indirectly, the election of a majority of the members of our board of directors, any change in our corporate charter, bylaws, management, policies or operations, or any of our gaming affiliates, or any other action which the Nevada Commission finds to be inconsistent with holding our voting securities for investment purposes only. Activities which are not deemed to be inconsistent with holding voting securities for investment purposes include only:

  • voting on all matters voted on by stockholders;
  • making financial and other inquiries of management of the type normally made by securities analysts for informational purposes and not to cause a change in our management, policies or operations; and
  • such other activities as the Nevada Commission may determine to be consistent with such investment intent.

If the beneficial holder of voting securities who must be found suitable is a corporation, partnership or trust, it must submit detailed business and financial information including a list of beneficial owners. The applicant is required to pay all costs of investigation.

Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within 30 days after being ordered to do so by the Nevada Commission or the Chairman of the Nevada Board, may be found unsuitable. The same restrictions apply to a record owner if the record owner, after request, fails to identify the beneficial owner. Any stockholder found unsuitable and who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of the common stock of a Registered Corporation beyond such period of time as may be prescribed by the Nevada Commission may be guilty of a criminal offense. We are subject to disciplinary action if, after we receive notice that a person is unsuitable to be a stockholder or to have any other relationship with us, California Hotel and Casino or any of our licensed subsidiaries, we:

  • pay that person any dividend or interest upon voting securities of Boyd Gaming;
  • allow that person to exercise, directly or indirectly, any voting right conferred through securities held by the person;
  • pay remuneration in any form to that person for services rendered or otherwise; or
  • fail to pursue all lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person to relinquish their voting securities for cash at fair market value.

Additionally, the Clark County Liquor and Gaming Licensing Board has taken the position that it has the authority to approve all persons owning or controlling the stock of any corporation controlling a gaming license.

The Nevada Commission may, at its discretion, require the holder of any debt security of a Registered Corporation to file applications, be investigated and be found suitable to own the debt security of a Registered Corporation. If the Nevada Commission determines that a person is unsuitable to own such security, then pursuant to the Nevada Act, the Registered Corporation can be sanctioned, including the loss of its approvals, if without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission, it:

  • pays to the unsuitable person any dividend, interest, or any distribution whatsoever;
  • recognizes any voting right by such unsuitable person in connection with such securities;
  • pays the unsuitable person remuneration in any form; or
  • makes any payment to the unsuitable person by way of principal, redemption, conversion, exchange, liquidation, or similar transaction.

We are required to maintain a current stock ledger in Nevada which may be examined by the Nevada Gaming Authorities at any time. If any securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to the Nevada Gaming Authorities. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable. We are also required to render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the beneficial owner.

We may not make a public offering of our securities without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission if the securities or the proceeds therefrom are intended to be used to construct, acquire or finance gaming facilities in Nevada, or to retire or extend obligations incurred for such purposes. Any representation to the contrary is unlawful. In September 2005, the Nevada Commission granted us two years, the maximum time permitted, in which to make public offerings of debt or equity. This two-year approval or continuous or delayed public offering approval, also known as a shelf approval, is subject to certain conditions and expires in September 2007, at which time we will seek to renew the approval. The Nevada Commission's approval may be rescinded for good cause without prior notice upon the issuance of an interlocutory stop order by the Chairman of the Nevada Board.

Changes in control of Boyd Gaming through merger, consolidation, stock or asset acquisitions, management or consulting agreements, or any act or conduct by a person whereby he obtains control, may not occur without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission. Entities seeking to acquire control of a Registered Corporation must satisfy the Nevada Gaming Authorities in a variety of stringent standards prior to assuming control of such Registered Corporation. The Nevada Commission may also require controlling stockholders, officers, directors and other persons having a material relationship or involvement with the entity proposing to acquire control, to be investigated and licensed as part of the approval process relating to the transaction.

The Nevada legislature has declared that some corporate acquisitions opposed by management, repurchase of voting securities and corporate defense tactics affecting Nevada gaming licensees, and Registered Corporations that are affiliated with those licensees, may be injurious to stable and productive corporate gaming. The Nevada Commission has established a regulatory scheme to ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of these business practices upon Nevada's gaming industry and to further Nevada's policy to:

  • assure the financial stability of corporate gaming operators and their affiliates;
  • preserve the beneficial aspects of conducting business in the corporate form; and
  • promote a neutral environment for the orderly governance of corporate affairs.

Approvals are, in certain circumstances, required from the Nevada Commission before we can make exceptional repurchases of voting securities above the current market price thereof and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management can be consummated. As a Registered Corporation, the Nevada Act also requires prior approval of a plan of recapitalization proposed by our board of directors in response to a tender offer made directly to our stockholders for the purposes of acquiring control of us.

License fees and taxes, computed in various ways depending on the type of gaming or activity involved, are payable to the State of Nevada, Clark County and the City of Las Vegas. Depending upon the particular fee or tax involved, these fees and taxes are payable either monthly, quarterly or annually and are based upon any of:

  • a percentage of the gross revenues received;
  • the number of gaming devices operated; or
  • the number of table games operated.

An excise tax is also paid by casino operations upon admission to certain facilities offering live entertainment, including the selling of food, refreshment and merchandise in connection therewith.

Any person who is licensed, required to be licensed, registered, required to be registered, or is under common control with such persons, which we refer to as Licensees, and who proposes to become involved in a gaming venture outside of Nevada is required to deposit with the Nevada Board, and thereafter maintain, a revolving fund in the amount of $10,000 to pay the expenses of investigation of the Nevada Board of their participation in such foreign gaming. The revolving fund is subject to increase or decrease in the discretion of the Nevada Commission. Thereafter, Licensees are required to comply with certain reporting requirements imposed by the Nevada Act. Licensees are also subject to disciplinary action by the Nevada Commission if they knowingly violate any laws of the foreign jurisdiction pertaining to the foreign gaming operation, fail to conduct the foreign gaming operation in accordance with the standards of honesty and integrity required of Nevada gaming operations, engage in activities that are harmful to the State of Nevada or its ability to collect gaming taxes and fees, or employ a person in the foreign operation who has been denied a license or finding of suitability in Nevada on the ground of personal unsuitability.

The sale of food or alcoholic beverages at our Nevada casinos is subject to licensing, control and regulation by the applicable local authorities. All licenses are revocable and are not transferable. The agencies involved have full power to limit, condition, suspend or revoke any such license, and any such disciplinary action could, and a revocation would, have a significant adverse effect upon the operations of the affected casino or casinos.

Illinois

We are subject to the jurisdiction of the Illinois gaming authorities as a result of our ownership and operation of Par-A-Dice Hotel Casino in East Peoria, Illinois.

In February 1990, the State of Illinois legalized riverboat gambling. The Illinois Riverboat Gambling Act, which we refer to as the initial Illinois Act, authorizes the five-member Illinois Gaming Board, which we refer to as the Illinois Board, to issue up to ten riverboat gaming owners' licenses on navigable streams within or forming a boundary of the State of Illinois except for Lake Michigan and any waterway in Cook County, which includes Chicago. Pursuant to the initial Illinois Act, a licensed owner who holds greater than a 10% interest in one riverboat operation, could hold no more than a 10% interest in any other riverboat operation. In addition, the initial Illinois Act restricted the location of certain of the ten owners' licenses. Four of the licenses were to be located on the Mississippi River, one license was to be at a location on the Illinois River south of Marshall County and one license had to be located on the Des Plaines River in Will County. The remaining licenses were not restricted as to location. Currently, nine owner's licenses are in operation, including one license in each of Alton, Aurora, East Peoria, East St. Louis, Elgin, Metropolis, Rock Island and two licenses in Joliet.

The tenth license, which was initially granted to an operator in East Dubuque, was not renewed by the Illinois Board and has been the subject of on-going litigation. The Illinois Board entered into a settlement agreement with the operator whereby the ownership interest in the tenth license was to be transferred to a new operator. The Illinois Board initiated a bid process and selected Isle of Capri as the new operator with its gaming operations to be located in Rosemont, Illinois. The Illinois Attorney General, pursuant to her authority, did not approve the settlement agreement which would have permitted the transfer of the ownership interest. Instead, the Illinois Board resumed its license revocation hearing, which had been held in abeyance. On November 15, 2005, the Administrative Law Judge issued his opinion, recommending that the Illinois Board revoke the operator's license. The record of the proceeding and the Judge's opinion was reviewed by the Illinois Board and the Illinois Board issued a final order revoking the operator's license. The operator is entitled to appeal a final Illinois Board order to the Illinois Appellate court. There is no assurance that this process will reach a successful conclusion.

Furthermore, under the initial Illinois Act, no gambling could be conducted while a riverboat was docked. A gaming excursion could last no more than four hours, and a gaming excursion was deemed to have started when the first passenger boarded a riverboat. Gaming could continue during passenger boarding for a period of up to 30 minutes. Gaming was also allowed for a period of up to 30 minutes after the gangplank or its equivalent was lowered, thereby allowing passengers to exit the riverboat. During the 30-minute exit time period, new passengers were not allowed to board the riverboat. Although riverboats were mandated to cruise, there were certain exceptions. If a riverboat captain reasonably determined that either it was unsafe to transport passengers on the waterway due to inclement weather or the riverboat had been rendered temporarily inoperable by unforeseeable mechanical or structural difficulties or river icing, the riverboat could remain dockside or return to the dock. In those situations, a gaming excursion could commence or continue while the gangplank or its equivalent was raised and remained raised, in which event the riverboat was not considered docked. If a gaming excursion had to begin or continue with the gangplank or its equivalent raised, and the riverboat did not leave the dock, entry of new patrons on to the riverboat was prohibited until the completion of the excursion.

In June of 1999, amendments to the Illinois Act, which we refer to as the Amended Illinois Act, were passed by the legislature and signed into law by the Governor. The Amended Illinois Act redefined the conduct of gaming in the state. Pursuant to the Amended Illinois Act, riverboats can conduct gambling without cruising, and passengers can enter and leave a riverboat at any time. In addition, riverboats may now be located upon any water within Illinois, and not just navigable waterways. There is no longer any prohibition of a riverboat being located in Cook County. Riverboats are now defined as self-propelled excursion boats or permanently moored barges. The Amended Illinois Act requires that only three, rather than four, owner's licenses, be located on the Mississippi River. The 10% ownership prohibition has also been removed. Therefore, subject to certain Illinois Board rules, individuals or entities could own more than one riverboat operation.

The Amended Illinois Act also allows for the relocation of a riverboat home dock. A licensee that was not conducting riverboat gambling on January 1, 1998, may apply to the Illinois Board for renewal and approval of relocation to a new home dock and the Illinois Board shall grant the application and approval of the new home dock upon the licensee providing to the Illinois Board authorization from the new dockside community. Any licensee that relocates in accordance with the provisions of the Amended Illinois Act must attain a level of at least 20% minority ownership of such a gaming operation.

The initial Illinois Act strictly regulates the facilities, persons, associations and practices related to gaming operations. The initial Illinois Act grants the Illinois Board specific powers and duties, and all other powers necessary and proper to fully and effectively execute the initial Illinois Act for the purpose of administering, regulating and enforcing the system of riverboat gaming. The Illinois Board has authority over every person, association, corporation, partnership and trust involved in riverboat gaming operations in the State of Illinois.

The initial Illinois Act requires the owner of a riverboat gaming operation to hold an owner's license issued by the Illinois Board. Each owner's license permits the holder to own up to two riverboats, however, gaming participants are limited to 1,200 for any owner's license. The number of gaming participants will be determined by the number of gaming positions available. Gaming positions are counted as follows:

  • electronic gaming devices positions will be determined as 90% of the total number of devices available for play;
  • craps tables will be counted as having ten gaming positions; and
  • games utilizing live gaming devices, except for craps, will be counted as having five gaming positions.

Each owner's license initially runs for a period of three years. Thereafter, the license must be renewed annually. Under the Amended Illinois Act, the Board may renew an owner's license for up to four years. An owner licensee is eligible for renewal upon payment of the applicable fee and a determination by the Illinois Board that the licensee continues to meet all of the requirements of the initial Illinois Act and Illinois Board rules. The owner's license for Par-A-Dice Riverboat Casino initially expired in February 1995. Since that time, the license has been renewed annually. The most recent renewal approved by the Illinois Board in March of 2004 was for a term of four years. An ownership interest in an owner's license may not be transferred or pledged as collateral without the prior approval of the Illinois Board.

Pursuant to the Amended Illinois Act, which lifted the 10% ownership prohibition, the Illinois Board established certain rules to effectuate this statutory change. In deciding whether to approve direct or indirect ownership or control of an owner's license, the Illinois Board shall consider the impact of any economic concentration of the ownership or control. No direct or indirect ownership or control shall be approved which will result in undue economic concentration of the ownership of riverboat gambling operations in Illinois. Undue economic concentration means that a person or entity would have actual or potential domination of riverboat gambling in Illinois sufficient to:

  • substantially impede or suppress competition among holders of owner's licenses;
  • adversely impact the economic stability of the riverboat casino industry in Illinois; or
  • negatively impact the purposes of the initial Illinois Act, including tourism, economic development, benefits to local communities, and State and local revenues.

The Illinois Board will consider the following criteria in determining whether the approval of the issuance, transfer or holding of a license will create undue economic concentration:

  • the percentage share of the market presently owned or controlled by the person or entity;
  • the estimated increase in the market share if the person or entity is approved to hold the owner's license;
  • the relative position of other persons or entities that own or control owner's licenses in Illinois;
  • the current and projected financial condition of the riverboat gaming industry;
  • the current market conditions, including proximity and level of competition, consumer demand, market concentration, and any other relevant characteristics of the market;
  • whether the license to be approved has separate organizational structures or other independent obligations;
  • the potential impact on the projected future growth and development of the riverboat gambling industry, the local communities in which licenses are located, and the State of Illinois;
  • the barriers to entry into the riverboat gambling industry and if the approval of the license will operate as a barrier to new companies and individuals desiring to enter the market;
  • whether the approval of the license is likely to result in enhancing the quality and customer appeal of products and services offered by riverboat casinos in order to maintain or increase their respective market shares;
  • whether a restriction on the approval of the additional license is necessary in order to encourage and preserve competition in casino operations; and
  • any other relevant information.

The initial Illinois Act does not limit the maximum bet or per patron loss. Minimum and maximum wagers on games are set by the owner licensee. Wagering may not be conducted with money or other negotiable currency. No person under the age of 21 is permitted to wager and wagers may only be received from a person present on the riverboat. With respect to electronic gaming devices, the payout percentage may not be less than 80% nor more than 100%.

An admission tax is imposed on the owner of a riverboat operation. Effective July 1, 2003, additional amendments to the Amended Illinois Act were passed by the legislature and signed into law by the Governor (the "Second Amended Illinois Act"). Under the Second Amended Illinois Act, for an owner licensee that admitted 2,300,000 persons or fewer in the previous calendar year, the admission tax is $4.00 per person and for a licensee that admitted more that 2,300,000 persons in the previous calendar year, the admission tax is $5.00. Additionally, a wagering tax is imposed on the adjusted gross receipts, as defined in the initial Illinois Act, of a riverboat operation. As of July 1, 2003, pursuant to the Second Amended Illinois Act, the wagering tax was increased as follows: 15% of annual adjusted gross receipts up to and including $25 million; 27.5% of annual adjusted gross receipts in excess of $25 million but not exceeding $37.5 million; 32.5% of annual adjusted gross receipts in excess of $37.5 million but not exceeding $50 million; 37.5% of annual adjusted gross receipts in excess of $50 million but not exceeding $75 million; 45% of annual adjusted gross receipts in excess of $75 million but not exceeding $100 million; 50% of annual adjusted gross receipts in excess of $100 million but not exceeding $250 million; and 70% of annual adjusted gross receipts in excess of $250 million. The owner licensee is required, on a daily basis, to wire the wagering tax payment to the Illinois Board. The wagering tax as outlined in the Second Amended Illinois Act shall no longer be imposed beginning on the earlier of (i) July 1, 2005; (ii) the first date after the effective date of the Second Amended Illinois Act that riverboat gambling operations are conducted pursuant to the dormant tenth license or (iii) the first day that riverboat gambling operations are conducted under the authority of an owners license that is in addition to the 10 owners' licenses authorized by the Initial Act. The tax will rollback to the rates as outlined in the Amended Act.

Effective July 1, 2005, additional amendments to the Second Amended Act were passed by the legislature and signed into law by the Governor (the "Third Amended Illinois Act"). Under the Third Amended Act, for an owner that admitted 1,000,000 persons or fewer in calendar year 2004, the admission tax is $2.00 and for all other licensees it is $3.00 per person admitted. Additionally, the wagering tax provisions were "rolled back" to the rates as defined in the Amended Act. Thus, the effective wager tax rates are: 15% of annual adjusted gross receipts up to and including $25,000,000; 22.5% of annual adjusted gross receipts in excess of $25,000,000 but not exceeding $50,000,000; 27.5% of annual adjusted gross receipts in excess of $50,000,000 but not exceeding $75,000,000; 32.5% of annual adjusted gross receipts in excess of $75,000,000 but not exceeding $100,000,000; 37.5% of annual adjusted gross receipts in excess of $100,000,000 but not exceeding $150,000,000; 45% of annual adjusted gross receipts in excess of $150,000,000 but not exceeding $200,000,000; and $50% of annual adjusted gross receipts in excess of $200,000,000. In addition to payment of the above listed amounts, by June 15 of each year, each owner (other than an owner that admitted 1,000,000 or fewer persons in calendar year 2004 must pay to the Illinois Board the amount, if any, by which the base amount for the licensed owner exceeds the amount of tax paid pursuant to the Third Amended Act. The base amount for a riverboat in East Peoria is $43,000,000. This obligation terminates on the earliest of (i) July 1, 2007, (ii) the first day after the effective date of the Third Amended Act that riverboat gambling operations are conducted pursuant to a dormant license, (iii) the first day that riverboat gambling operations are conducted under the authority of an owners license that is in addition to the 10 owners licenses initially authorized, or (iv) the first day that a licensee under the Illinois Horse Racing Act of 1975 conducts gaming operations with slot machines or other electronic gaming devices. There have been legislative discussions that the current base amount may be adjusted upward as it does not incorporate the amount of tax paid by the riverboat to its local community. Any upward adjustment may be imposed retroactively to the effective date of the Third Amended Illinois Act.

The Illinois Board has the authority to reduce the above mentioned wagering tax obligation imposed under the Third Amended Act by an amount the Board deems reasonable for acts of God, terrorism, bioterrorism or a condition beyond the control of the owner licensee. There can be no assurance that the Illinois legislature will not enact additional legislation regarding admission and wagering tax rates.

In addition to owner's licenses, the Illinois Board also requires licensing for all vendors of gaming supplies and equipment and for all employees of a riverboat gaming operation. The Illinois Board is authorized to conduct investigations into the conduct of gaming and into alleged violations of the Illinois Act and the Illinois Board rules. Employees and agents of the Illinois Board have access to and may inspect any facilities relating to the riverboat gaming operation.

A holder of any license is subject to the imposition of fines, suspension or revocation of such license, or other action for any act or failure to act by himself or his agents or employees, that is injurious to the public health, safety, morals, good order and general welfare of the people of the State of Illinois, or that would discredit or tend to discredit the Illinois gaming industry or the State of Illinois. Any riverboat operations not conducted in compliance with the initial Illinois Act may constitute an illegal gaming place and consequently may be subject to criminal penalties, which penalties include possible seizure, confiscation and destruction of illegal gaming devices and seizure and sale of riverboats and dock facilities to pay any unsatisfied judgment that may be recovered and any unsatisfied fine that may be levied. The initial Illinois Act also provides for civil penalties, equal to the amount of gross receipts derived from wagering on the gaming, whether unauthorized or authorized, conducted on the day of any violation. The Illinois Board may revoke or suspend licenses, as the Illinois Board may see fit and in compliance with applicable laws of the State of Illinois regarding administrative procedures and may suspend an owner's license, without notice or hearing, upon a determination that the safety or health of patrons or employees is jeopardized by continuing a riverboat's operation. The suspension may remain in effect until the Illinois Board determines that the cause for suspension has been abated and it may revoke the owner's license upon a determination that the owner has not made satisfactory progress toward abating the hazard.

If the Illinois Board has suspended, revoked or refused to renew the license of an owner or if a riverboat gambling operation is closing and the owner is voluntarily surrendering its owner's license, the Illinois Board may petition the local circuit court (the "Court") in which the riverboat is situated for appointment of a receiver. The circuit court will have sole jurisdiction over any and all issues pertaining to the appointment of a receiver. The Illinois Board will specify the specific powers, duties and limitations for the receiver, including but not limited to the authority to:

  • hire, fire, promote and discipline personnel and retain outside employees or consultants;
  • take possession of any and all property, including but not limited to its books, records, and papers;
  • preserve or dispose of any and all property;
  • continue and direct the gaming operations under the monitoring of the Illinois Board;
  • discontinue and dissolve the gaming operation;
  • enter into and cancel contracts;
  • borrow money and pledge, mortgage or otherwise encumber the property;
  • pay all secured and unsecured obligations;
  • institute or defend actions by or on behalf of the holder of an owner's license; and
  • distribute earnings derived from gaming operations in the same manner as admission and wagering taxes are distributed under Sections 12 and 13 of the initial Illinois Act.

The Illinois Board will submit at least three nominees to the Court. The nominees may be individuals or entities selected from an Illinois Board approved list of pre-qualified receivers who meet the same criteria for a finding of preliminary suitability for licensure under Sections 3000.230(c)(2)(B) and (C). In the event that the Illinois Board seeks the appointment of a receiver on an emergency basis, the Illinois Board will submit at least two nominees selected from the Illinois Board approved list of pre-qualified receivers to the Court and will issue a Temporary Operating Permit to the receiver appointed by the Court. A receiver, upon appointment by the court, will before assuming his or her duties, execute and post the same bond as an owner's licensee pursuant to Section 10 of the initial Illinois Act.

The receiver will function as an independent contractor, subject to the direction of the Court. However, the receiver will also provide to the Illinois Board regular reports and provide any information deemed necessary for the Illinois Board to ascertain the receiver's compliance with all applicable rules and laws. From time to time, the Illinois Board may, at its sole discretion, report to the Court on the receiver's level of compliance and any other information deemed appropriate for disclosure to the Court. The term and compensation of the receiver shall be set by the Court. The receiver will provide to the Court and the Illinois Board at least 30 days written notice of any intent to withdraw from the appointment or to seek modification of the appointment. Except as otherwise provided by action to the Illinois Board, the gaming operation will be deemed a licensed operation subject to all rules of the Illinois Board during the tenure of any receivership.

The Illinois Board requires that a "Key Person" of an owner licensee submit a Personal Disclosure or Business Entity Form and be investigated and approved by the Illinois Board. The Illinois Board shall certify for each applicant for or holder of an owner's license each position, individual or Business Entity that is to be approved by the Board and maintain suitability as a Key Person. With respect to an applicant for or the holder of an owner's license, Key Person shall include:

  • any Business Entity and any individual with an ownership interest or voting rights of more than 5% in the licensee or applicant, and the trustee of any trust holding such ownership interest or voting rights;
  • the directors of the licensee or applicant and its chief executive officer, president and chief operating officer, or their functional equivalents; and
  • all other individuals or Business Entities that, upon review of the applicant's or licensees Table of Organization, Ownership and Control (as discussed below), the Board determines hold a position or a level of ownership, control or influence that is material to the regulatory concerns and obligations of the Illinois Board for the specified licensee or applicant.

In order to assist the Illinois Board in its determination of Key Persons, applicants for or holders of an owner's license shall provide to the Illinois Board a Table of Organization, Ownership and Control, which we refer to as the Table. The Table will identify in sufficient detail the hierarchy of individuals and Business Entities that, through direct or indirect means, manage own or control the interest and assets of the applicant or licensee holder. If a Business Entity identified in the Table is a publicly traded company, the following information must be provided in the Table:

  • the name and percentage of ownership interest of each individual or Business Entity with ownership of more than 5% of the voting shares of the entity, to the extent such information is known or contained in Schedule 13D or 13G of Securities and Exchange Commission filings;
  • to the extent known, the names and percentage of interest of ownership of persons who are relatives of one another and who together (as individuals or through trusts) exercise control over or own more than 10% of the voting shares of the entity; and
  • any trust holding more than 5% ownership or voting interest in the entity, to the extent such information is known or contained in Schedule 13D or 13G of Securities and Exchange Commission filings. The Table may be disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act.

Each owner licensee must provide a means for the economic disassociation of a Key Person in the event such economic disassociation is required by an order of the Illinois Board. Based upon findings from an investigation into the character, reputation, experience, associations, business probity and financial integrity of a Key Person, the Illinois Board may enter an order upon the licensee or require the economic disassociation of such Key Person.

Furthermore, each applicant or owner licensee must disclose the identity of every person, association, trust or corporation having a greater than 1% direct or indirect pecuniary interest in an owner licensee or in the riverboat gaming operation with respect to which the license is sought. The Illinois Board may also require an applicant or owner licensee to disclose any other principal or investor and require the investigation and approval of such individuals.

The Illinois Board (unless the investor qualifies as an Institutional Investor) requires a Personal Disclosure Form from any person or entity who or which, individually or in association with others, acquires directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership of more than 5% of any class of voting securities or non-voting securities convertible into voting securities of a publicly-traded corporation which holds an ownership interest in the holder of an owner's license. If the Illinois Board denies an application for such a transfer and if no hearing is requested, the applicant for the transfer of ownership interest must promptly divest those shares in the publicly-traded parent corporation. The holder of an owner's license would not be able to distribute profits to a publicly-traded parent corporation until such shares have been divested. If a hearing is requested, the shares need not be divested and profits may be distributed to a publicly-held parent corporation pending the issuance of a final order from the Illinois Board.

An Institutional Investor that individually or jointly with others, cumulatively acquires, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of any class of voting securities of a publicly-traded licensee or a licensee's publicly-traded parent corporation shall, within no less than ten days after acquiring such securities, notify the Administrator of the Board of such ownership and shall provide any additional information as may be required. If an Institutional Investor (as specified above) acquires 10% or more of any class of voting securities of a publicly-traded licensee or a licensee's publicly-traded parent corporation, then it shall file an Institutional Investor Disclosure Form within 45 days after acquiring such level of ownership interest. The owner licensee shall notify the Administrator as soon as possible after it becomes aware that it or its parent is involved in an ownership acquisition by an Institutional Investor. The Institutional Investor also has an obligation to notify the Administrator of its ownership interest.

In addition to Institutional Investor Disclosure Forms, certain other forms may be required to be submitted to the Illinois Board. An owner-licensee must submit a Marketing Agent Form to the Illinois Board for each Marketing Agent with whom it intends to do business. A Marketing Agent is a person or entity, other than a junketeer or an employee of a riverboat gaming operation, who is compensated by the riverboat gaming operation in excess of $100 per patron per trip for identifying and recruiting patrons. Key Persons of owner-licensees must submit Trust Identification Forms for trusts, excluding land trusts, for which they are a grantor, trustee or beneficiary each time such a trust relationship is established, amended or terminated.

Applicants for and holders of an owner's license are required to obtain formal approval from the Illinois Board for changes in the following areas:

  • Key Persons;
  • type of entity;
  • equity and debt capitalization of the entity;
  • investors or debt holders;
  • source of funds;
  • applicant's economic development plan;
  • riverboat capacity or significant design change;
  • gaming positions;
  • anticipated economic impact; or
  • agreements, oral or written, relating to the acquisition or disposition of property (real or personal) of a value greater than $1 million.

A holder of an owner's license is allowed to make distributions to its stockholders only to the extent that such distribution would not impair the financial viability of the gaming operation. Factors to be considered by the licensee include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • cash flow, casino cash and working capital requirements;
  • debt service requirements, obligations and covenants associated with financial instruments;
  • requirements for repairs and maintenance and capital improvements;
  • employment or economic development requirements of the Amended Illinois Act; and
  • a licensee's financial projections.

The Illinois Board may waive any licensing requirement or procedure provided by rule if it determines that such waiver is in the best interests of the public and the gaming industry. Also, the Illinois Board may, from time to time, amend or change its rules.

From time to time, various proposals have been introduced in the Illinois legislature that, if enacted, would affect the taxation, regulation, operation or other aspects of the gaming industry or Boyd Gaming. Some of this legislation, if enacted, could adversely affect the gaming industry or Boyd Gaming. No assurance can be given whether such legislation or similar legislation will be enacted.

Uncertainty exists regarding the Illinois gaming regulatory environment due to limited experience in interpreting the Illinois Act.

New Jersey

On June 11, 2003 the New Jersey Casino Control Commission, or NJCCC, found that Marina District Development Company, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company (the "Operating Company") complied with all the requirements of the Casino Control Act for the issuance of a casino license to own and operate Borgata. The effective date of the license was July 2, 2003, the date the NJCCC Commission issued the Operating Company with an Operation Certificate. Such casino license was valid for a one year period and was renewed in June of 2004 for an additional one year period. On June 30, 2005 the casino license of the Operating Company was renewed for a five year period and is subject to successive five year renewal periods thereafter.

MDDC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marina District Development Holding Company, LLC (the "Holding Company"), i.e. the Holding Company is the sole member of the Operating Company. Boyd Atlantic City, Inc., or BAC and MAC Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mirage Resorts, Inc., or MAC, are members of the Holding Company and have 50% ownership interests therein, and BAC is the Managing Member of the Holding Company.

The ownership and operation of casino gaming facilities in New Jersey are subject to the Casino Control Act. In general, the Casino Control Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder contain detailed provisions concerning, among other things:

  • the granting of casino licenses;
  • the suitability of the approved hotel facility and the amount of authorized casino space and gaming units permitted therein;
  • the qualification of natural persons and entities related to the casino licensee;
  • the licensing and registration of employees and vendors of casino licensees;
  • the rules of the games;
  • the selling and redeeming of gaming chips;
  • the granting and duration of credit and the enforceability of gaming debts;
  • the management control procedures, accountability, and cash control methods and reports to gaming agencies;
  • the security standards;
  • the manufacture and distribution of gaming equipment;
  • the equal opportunity for employees and casino operators, contractors of casino facilities, and others; and
  • the advertising, entertainment, and alcoholic beverages.

The NJCCC is empowered under the Casino Control Act to regulate a wide spectrum of gaming and non-gaming related activities and to approve the form of ownership and financial structure of not only a casino licensee, but also its entity qualifiers and intermediary and holding companies.

No casino hotel facility may operate unless the appropriate license and approvals are obtained from the NJCCC, which has broad discretion with regard to the issuance, renewal, revocation, and suspension of such licenses and approvals, which are nontransferable. The qualification criteria with respect to the holder of a casino license include the following:

  • its financial stability, integrity and responsibility;
  • the integrity and adequacy of its financial resources which bear any relation to the casino project;
  • its good character, honesty, and integrity; and
  • the sufficiency of its business ability and casino experience to establish the likelihood of creation and maintenance of a successful, efficient casino operation.

The NJCCC may reopen licensing hearings at any time and must reopen a licensing hearing at the request of the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement, or the NJDGE.

To be considered financially stable, a licensee must demonstrate the following ability:

  • to pay winning wagers when due;
  • to achieve a gross operating profit;
  • to pay all local, state, and federal taxes when due;
  • to make necessary capital and maintenance expenditures to insure that it has a superior first-class facility; and
  • to pay, exchange, refinance or extend debts which will mature and become due and payable during the license term.

In the event a licensee fails to demonstrate financial stability, the NJCCC may take such action as it deems necessary to fulfill the purposes of the Casino Control Act and protect the public interest, including:

  • issuing conditional license approvals or determinations;
  • establishing an appropriate cure period;
  • imposing reporting requirements;
  • placing restrictions on the transfer of cash or the assumption of liability;
  • requiring reasonable reserves or trust accounts;
  • denying licensure; or
  • appointing a conservator.

Pursuant to the Casino Control Act, NJCCC regulations and precedent, no entity may hold a casino license unless:

  • each officer, director, principal employee, person who directly or indirectly holds any beneficial interest or ownership in the licensee;
  • each person who in the opinion of the NJCCC has the ability to control or elect a majority of the board of directors of the licensee (other than a banking or other licensed lending institution which makes a loan or holds a mortgage or other loan acquired in the ordinary course of business); and
  • any lender, whom the NJCCC may consider appropriate, obtains and maintains qualification approval from the NJCCC. Qualification approval means qualification requirements as a casino key employee, as described below.

An entity qualifier or intermediary or holding company is required to register with the NJCCC and meet the same basic standards for approval as a casino licensee; provided, however, that the NJCCC, with the concurrence of the Director of the NJDGE, may waive compliance by a publicly-traded corporate holding company as to any officer, director, lender, underwriter, agent or employee thereof, or person directly or indirectly holding a beneficial interest or ownership of the securities of such company, where the NJCCC and the Director of the NJDGE are satisfied that such persons are not significantly involved in the activities of the corporate licensee, and in the case of security holders, do not have the ability to control the publicly-traded corporation or elect one or more of its directors.

The NJCCC may require all financial backers, investors, mortgagors, bond holders and holders of notes or other evidence of indebtedness, either in effect or proposed, which bears any relation to the casino project, publicly-traded securities of an entity which holds a casino license or is an entity qualifier, subsidiary, or holding company of a casino licensee (a Regulated Company), to qualify as financial sources.

An Institutional Investor is defined by the Casino Control Act as any:

  • retirement fund administered by a public agency for the exclusive benefit of federal, state, or local public employees;
  • investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940;
  • collective investment trust organized by banks under Part Nine of the Rules of the Comptroller of the Currency;
  • closed end investment trust;
  • chartered or licensed life insurance company or property and casualty insurance company;
  • banking and other chartered or licensed lending institution;
  • investment advisor registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940; and
  • such other persons as the NJCCC may determine for reasons consistent with the policies of the Casino Control Act.

An Institutional Investor is granted a waiver by the NJCCC from financial source or other qualification requirements applicable to a holder of publicly-traded securities, in the absence of a prima facie showing by the NJDGE that there is any cause to believe that the Institutional Investor may be found unqualified, on the basis of NJCCC findings that:

  • its holdings were purchased for investment purposes only and, upon request by the NJCCC, it files a certified statement to the effect that is has no intention of influencing or affecting the affairs of the issuer, the casino licensee or its holding or intermediary companies; provided, however, that the Institutional Investor will be permitted to vote on matters put to the vote of the outstanding security holders; and
  • if the securities are debt securities of a casino licensee's holding or intermediary companies or another subsidiary company of the casino licensee's holding or intermediary companies which is related in any way to the financing of the casino licensee and represent either:

    • 20% or less of the total outstanding debt of the company; or
    • 50% or less of any issue of outstanding debt of the company;

  • the securities are under 10% of the equity securities of a casino licensee's holding or intermediary companies; or
  • if the securities so held exceed such percentages, upon a showing of good cause. The NJCCC may grant a waiver of qualification to an Institutional Investor holding a higher percentage of such securities upon a showing of good cause and if the conditions specified above are met.

Generally, the NJCCC requires each institutional holder seeking waiver of qualification to execute a certification to the effect that:

  • the holder has reviewed the definition of Institutional Investor under the Casino Control Act and believes that it meets the definition of Institutional Investor;
  • the securities are those of a publicly-traded corporation;
  • the holder purchased the securities for investment purposes only and holds them in the ordinary course of business;
  • the holder has no involvement in the business activities of, and no intention of influencing or affecting the affairs of the issuer, the casino licensee, or any affiliate; and
  • if the holder subsequently determines to influence or affect the affairs of the issuer, the casino licensee or any affiliate, will provide not less than 30 days' prior notice of such intent and will file with the NJCCC an application for qualification before taking any such action.

If an Institutional Investor changes its investment intent, or if the NJCCC finds reasonable cause to believe that it may be found unqualified, the Institutional Investor may take no action with respect to the security holdings, other than to divest itself of such holdings, until it has applied for interim casino authorization and has executed a trust agreement pursuant to such an application.

The Casino Control Act imposes certain restrictions upon the issuance, ownership, and transfer of securities of a Regulated Company, and defines the term "security" to include instruments which evidence a direct or indirect beneficial ownership or creditor interest in a Regulated Company including, but not limited to, mortgages, debentures, security agreements, notes and warrants.

If the NJCCC finds that a holder of such securities is not qualified under the Casino Control Act, it has the right to take any remedial action it may deem appropriate, including the right to force divestiture by such disqualified holder of such securities. In the event that certain disqualified holders fail to divest themselves of such securities, the NJCCC has the power to revoke or suspend the casino license affiliated with the Regulated Company which issued the securities. If a holder is found unqualified, it is unlawful for the holder:

  • to exercise, directly or through any trustee or nominee, any right conferred by such securities; or
  • to receive any dividends or interest upon any such securities or any remuneration, in any form, from its affiliated casino licensee for services rendered or otherwise.

With respect to non-publicly-traded securities, the Casino Control Act and NJCCC regulations require that the corporate charter or partnership agreement of a Regulated Company establish:

  • a right in the NJCCC of prior approval with regard to transfers of securities, shares and other interests; and
  • an absolute right in the Regulated Company to repurchase at the market price or the purchase price, whichever is the lesser, any such security, share, or other interest in the event that the NJCCC disapproves a transfer.

With respect to publicly-traded securities, such corporate charter or partnership agreement is required to establish that any such securities of the entity are held subject to the condition that, if a holder thereof is found to be disqualified by the NJCCC, such holder shall dispose of such securities.

Whenever any person enters into a contract to transfer any property which relates to an on-going casino operation, including a security of the casino licensee or a holding or intermediary company or entity qualifier, under circumstances which would require that the transferee obtain licensure or be qualified under the Casino Control Act, and that person is not already licensed or qualified, the transferee is required to apply for interim authorization. Furthermore, the closing or settlement date in the contract may not be earlier than the 121st day after the submission of a complete application for licensure or qualification together with a fully executed trust agreement in a form approved by the NJCCC. If, after the report of the NJDGE and a hearing by the NJCCC, the NJCCC grants interim authorization, the property will be subject to a trust. If the NJCCC denies interim authorization, the contract may not close or settle until the NJCCC makes a determination on the qualifications of the applicant. If the NJCCC denies qualification, the contract will be terminated for all purposes, and there will be no liability on the part of the transferor.

If, as the result of a transfer of publicly-traded securities of a Regulated Company or a financing entity of a Regulated Company, any person is required to qualify under the Casino Control Act, that person is required to file an application for licensure or qualification within 30 days after the NJCCC determines that qualification is required or declines to waive qualification.

The application must include a fully executed trust agreement in a form approved by the NJCCC, or in the alternative, within 120 days after the NJCCC determines that qualification is required, the person whose qualification is required must divest such securities as the NJCCC may require in order to remove the need to qualify.

The NJCCC may grant interim casino authorization where it finds by clear and convincing evidence that:

  • statements of compliance have been issued pursuant to the Casino Control Act;
  • the casino hotel is an approved hotel in accordance with the Casino Control Act;
  • the trustee satisfies qualification criteria applicable to casino key employees, except for residency; and
  • interim operation will best serve the interests of the public.

When the NJCCC finds the applicant qualified, the trust will terminate. If the NJCCC denies qualification to a person who has received interim casino authorization, the trustee is required to endeavor, and is authorized, to sell, assign, convey, or otherwise dispose of the property subject to the trust to such persons who are licensed or qualified or shall themselves obtain interim casino authorization.

Where a holder of publicly-traded securities is required, in applying for qualification as a financial source or qualifier, to transfer such securities to a trust in application for interim casino authorization and the NJCCC thereafter orders that the trust become operative:

  • during the time the trust is operative, the holder may not participate in the earnings of the casino hotel or receive any return on its investment or debt security holdings; and
  • after disposition, if any, of the securities by the trustee, proceeds distributed to the unqualified holder may not exceed the lower of their actual cost to the unqualified holder or their value calculated as if the investment had been made on the date the trust became operative.

The NJCCC may permit a licensee to increase its casino space if the licensee agrees to add a prescribed number of qualifying sleeping units within two years after the commencement of gaming operations in the additional casino space. However, if the casino licensee does not fulfill such agreement due to conditions within its control, the licensee will be required to close the additional casino space, or any portion of thereof that the NJCCC determines should be closed.

The NJCCC is authorized to establish annual fees for the renewal of casino licenses. The renewal fee is based upon the cost of maintaining control and regulatory activities prescribed by the Casino Control Act, and may not be less than $100,000 for a one-year casino license nor less than $200,000 for a four-year casino license. Additionally, casino licenses are subject to potential assessments to fund any annual operating deficits incurred by the NJCCC or the NJDGE. There is also an annual license fee of $500 for each slot machine maintained for use or in use in any casino. Additionally, each casino licensee is also required to pay an annual tax of 8% on its gross casino revenues. Finally, commencing in state fiscal years 2004 through 2006, a tax at the rate of 7.5% has been imposed on the adjusted net income of a casino licensee.

Each party to an agreement for the management of a casino is required to hold a casino license, and the party who is to manage the casino must own at least 10% of all the outstanding equity securities of the casino licensee. Such an agreement shall provide for:

  • the complete management of the casino;
  • the sole and unrestricted power to direct the casino operations; and
  • a term long enough to ensure the reasonable continuity, stability, independence and management of the casino.

An investment alternative tax imposed on the gross casino revenues of each licensee in the amount of 2.5% is due and payable on the last day of April following the end of the calendar year. A licensee is obligated to pay the investment alternative tax for a period of 30 years. This investment alternative tax may be offset by investment tax credits equal to 1.25% of gross gaming revenue, which are obtained by purchasing bonds issued by, or investing in housing or other development projects approved by, the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority.

If, at any time, it is determined that a Regulated Company has violated the Casino Control Act, or that any such entity cannot meet the qualification requirements of the Casino Control Act, such entity could be subject to fines or the suspension or revocation of its license or qualification. If a Regulated Company's license is suspended for a period in excess of 120 days or revoked, or upon the failure or refusal to renew a casino license, the NJCCC could appoint a conservator to operate or dispose of such entity's casino hotel facilities. The conservator would be required to act under the direct supervision of the NJCCC and would be charged with the duty of conserving, preserving and, if permitted, continuing the operation of such casino hotel. During the period of true conservatorship, a former or suspended casino licensee is entitled to a fair rate of return out of net earnings, if any, on the property retained by the conservator. The NJCCC may also discontinue any conservatorship action and direct the conservator to take such steps as are necessary to affect an orderly transfer of the property of a former or suspended casino licensee.

Casino employees are subject to more stringent requirements than non-casino employees and must meet applicable standards pertaining to financial stability, responsibility, good character, honesty, integrity and New Jersey residency. These requirements have resulted in significant competition among Atlantic City casino operators for the services of qualified employees.

Casinos must follow certain procedures which are outlined in the Casino Control Act when granting gaming credit and recording counter checks which have been exchanged, redeemed or consolidated. Gaming debts arising in Atlantic City in accordance with applicable regulations are enforceable in the courts of the State of New Jersey.

On January 15, 2006, the New Jersey State Legislature enacted the Smoke-Free Air Act that became effective April 15, 2006. This law called for smoke-free environments in essentially all indoor workplaces and places open to the public including places of business and service-related activities. The law contains several exceptions including an exemption for all casino floor space and 20% of a hotel's designated hotel rooms. On February 15, 2007, Atlantic City promulgated a local ordinance that is more restrictive than the aforementioned state law. Specifically this ordinance reduced the casino floor exemption to 25% of a casino's floor space. As such, smoking will be prohibited on 75% of a casino's floor space and permitted on 25% of a casino's floor space subject to the following conditions:

  • By April 15, 2007, casinos are required to limit smoking to 25% of their casino floor space, which areas initially will not be required to be enclosed and separately ventilated.
  • Ultimately, the 25% of the casino floor in which smoking would be permissible will be required to be enclosed and separately ventilated. Casinos will have five months from April 15, 2007 to submit construction plans for such enclosures to applicable authorities for the issuance of building permits and related required approvals. Once permits are issued, the casinos will have 90 days to commence construction of the enclosures.

Under the Atlantic City ordinance, smoking will remain permissible in 20% of a hotel's designated hotel rooms, consistent with state law.

Louisiana

In the State of Louisiana, the Company, through wholly owned subsidiaries, owns and operates three gaming properties: Treasure Chest Casino in Kenner, Delta Downs Racetrack, Casino & Hotel in Vinton and Sam's Town Hotel and Casino in Shreveport. The operation and management of riverboat casinos, slot machine operations at certain racetracks and live racing facilities in Louisiana are subject to extensive state regulation. The Louisiana Riverboat Economic Development and Gaming Control Act, or the Riverboat Act, became effective on July 19, 1991. The Louisiana Pari-Mutuel Live Racing Facility Economic Redevelopment and Gaming Control Act, or the Slots Act, became effective on July 9, 1997. The statutory scheme regulating live and off-track betting, or the Horse Racing Act, has been in existence for decades.

The Riverboat Act states, among other things, that certain of the policies of the State of Louisiana are:

  • to develop a historic riverboat industry that will assist in the growth of the tourism market;
  • to license and supervise the riverboat industry from the period of construction through actual operation;
  • to regulate the operators, manufacturers, suppliers and distributors of gaming devices; and
  • to license all entities involved in the riverboat gaming industry.

The Slots Act states, among other things, that certain policies of the State of Louisiana are:

  • to revitalize and rehabilitate pari-mutuel racing facilities through the allowance of slot machine operations at certain racetracks; and
  • to regulate and license owners of such facilities.

The Horse Racing Act states, among other things, that certain policies of the State of Louisiana are:

  • to encourage the development of horse racing with pari-mutuel wagering on a high plane;
  • to encourage the development and ownership of race horses;
  • to regulate the business of racing horses and to provide the orderly conduct of racing;
  • to provide financial assistance to encourage the business of racing horses; and
  • to provide a program for the regulation, ownership, possession, licensing, keeping, breeding and inoculation of horses.

Both the Riverboat Act and the Slots Act make it clear, however, that no holder of a license or permit possesses any vested interest in such license or permit and that the license or permit may be revoked at any time.

In a special session held in April 1996, the Louisiana legislature passed the Louisiana Gaming Control Act, or the Gaming Control Act, which created the Louisiana Gaming Control Board, or the Gaming Control Board. Pursuant to the Gaming Control Act, all of the regulatory authority, control and jurisdiction of licensing for both riverboats and slot facilities was transferred to the Gaming Control Board. The Gaming Control Board came into existence on May 1, 1996 and is made up of nine members and two ex-officio members (the Secretary of Revenue and Taxation and the superintendent of Louisiana State Police). It is domiciled in Baton Rouge and regulates riverboat gaming, the land-based casino in New Orleans, racetrack slot facilities and video poker. The Attorney General acts as legal counsel to the Gaming Control Board. Any material alteration in the method whereby riverboat gaming or slot facilities is regulated in the State of Louisiana could have an adverse effect on the operations of the Treasure Chest, Delta Downs and Sam's Town Shreveport.

Riverboats

The Louisiana legislature also passed legislation requiring each parish (county) where riverboat gaming is currently authorized to hold an election in order for the voters to decide whether riverboat gaming will remain legal in that parish. Treasure Chest is located in Jefferson Parish, Louisiana. Jefferson Parish approved riverboat gaming at a special election held on November 6, 1996. Sam's Town Shreveport is located in Caddo Parish, Louisiana which approved riverboat gaming at the special election held on November 6, 1996.

The Riverboat Act approved the conducting of gaming activities on a riverboat, in accordance with the Riverboat Act, on twelve separate waterways in Louisiana. The Riverboat Act allows the Gaming Control Board to issue up to fifteen licenses to operate riverboat gaming projects within the state, with no more than six in any one parish. There are presently fifteen licenses issued and twelve riverboats operating currently. Three riverboats are not operational due to recent storms. The Belle of New Orleans, once located on Lake Pontchartrain has been closed and the LGCB has approved moving the berth site to St. Mary Parish in south central Louisiana. Harrah's sold both of the entities which once owned riverboats in Lake Charles to Pinnacle Entertainment. Pinnacle plans to move one riverboat adjacent to its existing property in Lake Charles and move the other to Baton Rouge.

Pursuant to the Riverboat Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder, each applicant which desired to operate a riverboat casino in Louisiana was required to file a number of separate applications for a Certificate of Preliminary Approval, all necessary gaming licenses and a Certificate of Final Approval. No final Certificate was issued without all necessary and proper certificates from all regulatory agencies, including the U.S. Coast Guard, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, local port authorities and local levee authorities.

Both the Treasure Chest project and the Sam's Town Shreveport project applications for a Certificate of Preliminary Approval were properly filed and each received a Certificate of Preliminary Approval in 1993 (at that time Sam's Town Shreveport was owned by Harrah's Entertainment) and both received their original license in 1994. These licenses have been renewed and are subject to certain general operational conditions and are subject to revocation pursuant to applicable laws and regulations.

We and certain of our directors and officers and certain of our key personnel were found suitable to operate riverboat gaming in the State of Louisiana. New directors, officers and certain key employees associated with gaming must also be found suitable by the Gaming Control Board prior to working in gaming-related areas. These approvals may be immediately revoked for a number of causes as determined by the Gaming Control Board. The Gaming Control Board may deny any application for a certificate, permit or license for any cause found to be reasonable by the Gaming Control Board. The Gaming Control Board has the authority to require us to sever our relationships with any persons for any cause deemed reasonable by the Gaming Control Board or for the failure of that person to file necessary applications with the Gaming Control Board.

The current Louisiana riverboat gaming license of Treasure Chest was valid for five years and was to expire on May 18, 2005. An application for renewal was filed and, in January 2005, the renewal was approved by the Gaming Control Board for an additional five-year period. The Sam's Town Shreveport license was to expire in March of 2005 and in January 2005, the renewal was approved by the Gaming Control Board for an additional five-year period.

The Company is involved in legal proceedings with an unsuccessful applicant for the original Treasure Chest riverboat license in Louisiana.

Alvin C. Copeland, the sole shareholder of an unsuccessful applicant for a riverboat license at the location of our Treasure Chest Casino, has made several attempts to have the Treasure Chest license revoked and awarded to his company. In 1999 and 2000, Copeland unsuccessfully opposed the renewal of the Treasure Chest license and has brought two separate legal actions against us. In November 1993, Copeland objected to the relocation of Treasure Chest Casino from the Mississippi River to its current site on Lake Pontchartrain. The predecessor to the Louisiana Gaming Control Board allowed the relocation over Copeland's objection. Copeland then filed an appeal of the agency's decision with the Nineteenth Judicial District Court. Through a number of amendments to the appeal, Copeland improperly attempted to transform the appeal into a direct action suit and sought the revocation of the Treasure Chest license. Treasure Chest intervened in the matter in order to protect its interests. The appeal/suit, as it related to Treasure Chest Casino, was dismissed by the District Court and that dismissal was upheld on appeal by the First Circuit Court of Appeal. Additionally, in 1999, Copeland filed a direct action against Treasure Chest and certain other parties seeking the revocation of Treasure Chest's license, an award of the license to him and monetary damages. The suit was dismissed by the trial court citing that Copeland failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The dismissal was appealed by Copeland to the First Circuit Court of Appeal. On June 21, 2002, the First Circuit Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's decision and remanded the matter to the trial court. On January 14, 2003, we filed a motion to dismiss the matter and that motion was denied. The matter has been dormant all of 2005. We currently are vigorously defending the lawsuit.

If this matter ultimately results in the Treasure Chest license being revoked, it would have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Annual fees are currently charged to each riverboat project as follows:

  • $50,000 per year for the first year and $100,000 for each year thereafter; and
  • 21.5% of net gaming proceeds.

Additionally, each local government may charge a boarding fee or admissions tax. Treasure Chest pays the City of Kenner a fee of $2.50 per passenger boarding the vessel. Sam's Town Shreveport pays admission taxes of 4.75% of adjusted gross receipts to various local governmental bodies. Any increase in these fees or taxes could have a material and detrimental effect on the operations of Treasure Chest and Sam's Town.

Slot Facilities

The Slots Act allows for three separate "eligible facilities" to operate slot machines at live horse racing pari- mutuel facilities (one each in Calcasieu Parish, St. Landry Parish and Bossier Parish). Each facility may, upon proper licensure, operate slot machines in up to 15,000 square feet of gaming space.

On October 30, 2001, the Louisiana Gaming Control Board granted us a gaming license to operate slot machines at Delta Downs. However, suits by competitors, Isle of Capri and Harrah's of Lake Charles delayed the opening of the facility. These suits have since been dismissed with prejudice in favor of Delta Downs.

Gaming licenses and approvals are issued by the Gaming Control Board, and are subject to revocation for any cause deemed reasonable by the Gaming Control Board. Our operation of slot machines at Delta Downs is subject to strict regulation by the Gaming Control Board and the Louisiana State Police. Extensive regulations concerning accounting, internal controls, underage patrons and other aspects of slot machine operations have been promulgated by the Gaming Control Board. Failure to adhere to these rules and regulations can result in substantial fines and the suspension or revocation of the license to conduct slot machine operations. Any failure to comply with the Louisiana Gaming Control Board's rules or regulations in the future could ultimately result in the revocation of our license to operate slot machines at Delta Downs.

Annual Fees and taxes currently charged Delta Downs under the Slots Acts are as follows:

  • 15% of the annual net slot machine proceeds are dedicated to supplement purses of the live horse race meets held at the facility;
  • 3% of the annual net slot machine proceeds dedicated to horse breeders associations;
  • 18.5% taxable net slot machine proceeds are paid to the state;
  • $0.25 per person attending live racing and off-track betting facilities during those periods when it is conducting race meetings, only on those days when there are scheduled live races at its racetrack (currently Thursdays through Sundays) from the hours of 6:00 p.m. until 12:00 a.m. and during those periods when it is not conducting live racing (i.e., between race meetings) only on Thursdays through Mondays from the hours of 12:00 p.m. until 12:00 a.m.

Gaming Control Board

At any time, the Gaming Control Board may investigate and require the finding of suitability of any stockholder, beneficial stockholder, officer or director of Boyd Gaming or of any of its subsidiaries. The Gaming Control Board requires all holders of more than a 5% interest in the license holder to submit to suitability requirements. Additionally, if a shareholder who must be found suitable is a corporate or partnership entity, then the shareholders or partners of the entity must also submit to investigation. The sale or transfer of more than a 5% interest in any riverboat or slot project is subject to Gaming Control Board approval.

Pursuant to the regulations promulgated by the Gaming Control Board, all licensees are required to inform the Gaming Control Board of all debt, credit, financing and loan transactions, including the identity of debt holders. Our subsidiaries, Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C., Boyd Racing, L.L.C., and Red River Entertainment Partnership (Sam's Town Shreveport) are licensees and are subject to these regulations. In addition, the Gaming Control Board, in its sole discretion, may require the holders of such debt securities to file applications and obtain suitability certificates from the Gaming Control Board. Although the Riverboat Act and the Slots Act do not specifically require debt holders to be licensed or to be found suitable, the Gaming Control Board retains the discretion to investigate and require that any holders of debt securities be found suitable under the Riverboat Act or the Slots Act. Additionally, if the Gaming Control Board finds that any holder exercises a material influence over the gaming operations, a suitability certificate will be required. If the Gaming Control Board determines that a person is unsuitable to own such a security or to hold such an indebtedness, the Gaming Control Board may propose any action which it determines proper and necessary to protect the public interest, including the suspension or revocation of the license. The Gaming Control Board may also, under the penalty of revocation of license, issue a condition of disqualification naming the person(s) and declaring that such person(s) may not:

  • receive dividends or interest in debt or securities;
  • exercise directly or through a nominee a right conferred by the securities or indebtedness;
  • receive any remuneration from the licensee;
  • receive any economic benefit from the licensee; or
  • continue in an ownership or economic interest in a licensee or remain as a manager, director or partner of a licensee.

Any violation of the Riverboat Act, the Slots Act or the rules promulgated by the Gaming Control Board could result in substantial fines, penalties (including a revocation of the license) and criminal actions. Additionally, all licenses and permits issued by the Gaming Control Board are revocable privileges and may be revoked at any time by the Gaming Control Board.

Live Horse Racing

Pari-mutuel betting and the conducting of live horse race meets in Louisiana are strictly regulated by the Louisiana State Racing Commission, which we refer to as the Racing Commission. The Racing Commission is comprised of ten members and is domiciled in New Orleans, Louisiana. In order to be approved to conduct a live race meet and to operate pari-mutuel wagering (including off-track betting), an applicant must show, among other things:

  • racing experience;
  • financial qualifications;
  • moral and financial qualifications of applicant and applicant's partners, officers and officials;
  • the expected effect on the breeding and horse industry;
  • the expected effect on the State's economy; and
  • the hope of financial success.

In May 2001, a subsidiary of Boyd Gaming applied for and received approval from the Racing Commission to buy Delta Downs. Approval was also granted to conduct live race meets and to operate pari-mutuel wagering at the Delta Downs facility and to conduct off-track wagering at Delta Downs. The term of these licenses is ten years.

In a special session of the Louisiana Legislature, held in October of 2005, HB 56 and HB 78 were passed relative to the conducting of slot operations at an eligible live racing facility in Louisiana. Prior to the passage of the bills, our Delta Downs race track was required to hold no less than eighty days of live racing within a consecutive twenty-week period. HB 56 and HB 78 now allow the Louisiana State Racing Commission to make certain exceptions for facilities which are affected by natural disasters, such as Hurricane Rita. Due to the property damage done by Hurricane Rita, it was not possible to conduct the requisite days of live racing at Delta Downs and Delta Downs petitioned the Commission for an exemption from the requirement. On January 6, 2006, at a meeting of the Commission, that exemption was granted. Delta Downs resumed live racing in April 2006.

Any alteration in the regulation of riverboat casinos, slot machine operations at certain racetracks, or live racing facilities could have a material adverse effect on the operations of Treasure Chest, Delta Downs, or Sam's Town Shreveport.

Mississippi

The ownership and operation of casino gaming facilities in the State of Mississippi, such as those at Sam's Town Tunica, are subject to extensive state and local regulation, but primarily the licensing and regulatory control of the Mississippi Gaming Commission, or the Mississippi Commission.

The Mississippi Gaming Control Act, or the Mississippi Act, is similar to the Nevada Gaming Control Act. The Mississippi Commission has adopted regulations that are also similar in many respects to the Nevada gaming regulations.

The laws, regulations and supervisory procedures of the Mississippi Commission are based upon declarations of public policy that are concerned with, among other things:

  • the prevention of unsavory or unsuitable persons from having a direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity;
  • the establishment and maintenance of responsible accounting practices and procedures;
  • the maintenance of effective controls over the financial practices of licensees, including the establishment of minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets and revenues, providing for reliable record keeping and requiring the filing of periodic reports with the Mississippi Commission;
  • the prevention of cheating and fraudulent practices;
  • providing a source of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees; and
  • ensuring that gaming licensees, to the extent practicable, employ Mississippi residents.

The regulations are subject to amendment and interpretation by the Mississippi Commission. We believe that our compliance with the licensing procedures and regulatory requirements of the Mississippi Commission will not affect the marketability of our securities. Changes in Mississippi laws or regulations may limit or otherwise materially affect the types of gaming that may be conducted and such changes, if enacted, could have an adverse effect on us and our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Mississippi Act provides for legalized gaming in each of the fourteen counties that border the Gulf Coast or the Mississippi River, but only if the voters in the county have not voted to prohibit gaming in that county. In recent years, certain anti-gaming groups proposed for adoption through the initiative and referendum process certain amendments to the Mississippi Constitution which would prohibit gaming in the state. The proposals were declared illegal by Mississippi courts on constitutional and procedural grounds. The latest ruling was appealed to the Mississippi Supreme Court, which affirmed the decision of the lower court. If another such proposal were to be offered and if a sufficient number of signatures were to be gathered to place a legal initiative on the ballot, it is possible for the voters of Mississippi to consider such a proposal. While we are unable to predict whether such an initiative will appear on a future ballot or the likelihood of such an initiative being approved by the voters, if such an initiative were passed and gaming were prohibited in Mississippi, it would have a significant adverse impact on us and our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Currently, gaming is permissible in nine of the fourteen eligible counties in the state and gaming operations have commenced in seven counties. Traditionally, Mississippi law required gaming vessels to be located on the Mississippi River or on navigable waters in eligible counties along the Mississippi River, or in the waters lying south of the counties along the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Recently, however, the Mississippi Legislature amended the Mississippi Act to permit licensees in the three counties along the Gulf Coast to establish land-based casino operations provided the gaming areas do not extend more than 800 feet beyond the nineteen-year mean high water line, except in Harrison County where the 800-foot limit can be extended as far as the southern boundary of Highway 90.

Our Sam's Town Tunica casino is located on barges situated in a specially constructed basin several hundred feet inland from the Mississippi River. In the past, whether basins such as the one in which our casino barges are located constituted "navigable waters" suitable for gaming under Mississippi law was a controversial issue. The Mississippi Attorney General issued an opinion in July 1993 addressing legal locations for gaming vessels under the Mississippi Act and the Mississippi Commission later approved the location of the casino barges on the Sam's Town Tunica site as legal under the opinion of the Mississippi Attorney General. Although a competitor requested the Mississippi Commission to review and reconsider its decision, the Mississippi Commission declined to do so and since that date has issued or renewed licenses to Sam's Town Tunica on several separate occasions. Continued licensing of Sam's Town Tunica requires demonstration of compliance with the Mississippi Attorney General's "navigable waters" opinion, a requirement which has been imposed on many Tunica County licensees. We believe that Sam's Town Tunica is in compliance with the Mississippi Act and the Mississippi Attorney General's "navigable waters" opinion. However, no assurance can be given that a court ultimately would conclude that our casino barges at Sam's Town Tunica are located on navigable waters within the meaning of Mississippi law. If the basin in which our Sam's Town Tunica casino barges presently are located were not deemed navigable waters within the meaning of Mississippi law, such a decision would have a significant adverse effect on us and our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Mississippi Act permits unlimited stakes gaming on a 24-hour basis and does not restrict the percentage of space which may be utilized for gaming. The Mississippi Act permits substantially all traditional casino games and gaming devices.

We and any subsidiary of ours that operates a casino in Mississippi, which we refer to as a Gaming Subsidiary, are subject to the licensing and regulatory control of the Mississippi Commission. We are registered under the Mississippi Act as a publicly traded corporation, or a Registered Corporation, of Boyd Tunica, Inc., the owner and operator of Sam's Town Tunica, a licensee of the Mississippi Commission. As a Registered Corporation, we are required periodically to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Mississippi Commission and furnish any other information the Mississippi Commission may require. If we are unable to continue to satisfy the registration requirements of the Mississippi Act, we and any Gaming Subsidiary cannot own or operate gaming facilities in Mississippi. No person may become a stockholder of or receive any percentage of profits from a licensed subsidiary of a Registered Corporation without first obtaining licenses and approvals from the Mississippi Commission. We have obtained such approvals in connection with the licensing of Sam's Town Tunica.

A Gaming Subsidiary must maintain a gaming license from the Mississippi Commission to operate a casino in Mississippi. Such licenses are issued by the Mississippi Commission subject to certain conditions, including continued compliance with all applicable state laws and regulations. There are no limitations on the number of gaming licenses that may be issued in Mississippi. Gaming licenses require the payment of periodic fees and taxes, are not transferable, are issued for a three-year period (and may be continued for two additional three-year periods) and must be renewed periodically thereafter. Sam's Town Tunica's current gaming license expires in December of 2007.

Certain of our officers and employees and the officers, directors and certain key employees of Sam's Town Tunica must be found suitable or approved by the Mississippi Commission. We believe that we have obtained, applied for or are in the process of applying for all necessary findings of suitability with respect to Boyd Gaming or Sam's Town Tunica, although the Mississippi Commission, in its discretion, may require additional persons to file applications for findings of suitability. In addition, any person having a material relationship or involvement with us may be required to be found suitable, in which case those persons must pay the costs and fees associated with such investigation. The Mississippi Commission may deny an application for a finding of suitability for any cause that it deems reasonable. Changes in certain licensed positions must be reported to the Mississippi Commission. In addition to its authority to deny an application for a finding of suitability, the Mississippi Commission has jurisdiction to disapprove a change in any person's corporate position or title and such changes must be reported to the Mississippi Commission. The Mississippi Commission has the power to require us and our Mississippi Gaming Subsidiary to suspend or dismiss officers, directors and other key employees or sever relationships with other persons who refuse to file appropriate applications or whom the authorities find unsuitable to act in such capacities. Determination of suitability or questions pertaining to licensing are not subject to judicial review in Mississippi.

At any time, the Mississippi Commission has the power to investigate and require the finding of suitability of any record or beneficial stockholder of Boyd Gaming. The Mississippi Act requires any person who acquires more than five percent of any class of voting securities of a Registered Corporation, as reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, to report the acquisition to the Mississippi Commission, and such person may be required to be found suitable. Also, any person who becomes a beneficial owner of more than ten percent of any class of voting securities of a Registered Corporation, as reported to the SEC, must apply for a finding of suitability by the Mississippi Commission and must pay the costs and fees that the Mississippi Commission incurs in conducting the investigation. If a stockholder who must be found suitable is a corporation, partnership or trust, it must submit detailed business and financial information including a list of beneficial owners.

The Mississippi Commission generally has exercised its discretion to require a finding of suitability of any beneficial owner of more than five percent of any class of voting securities of a Registered Corporation. However, under certain circumstances, an "institutional investor," as defined in the Mississippi Commission's regulations, which acquires more than ten percent, but not more than fifteen percent, of the voting securities of a Registered Corporation may apply to the Mississippi Commission for a waiver of such finding of suitability if such institutional investor holds the voting securities for investment purposes only. An institutional investor shall not be deemed to hold voting securities for investment purposes unless the voting securities were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business as an institutional investor and not for the purpose of causing, directly or indirectly, the election of a majority of the members of the board of directors of the Registered Corporation, any change in the corporate charter, bylaws, management, policies or operations, or any of its gaming affiliates, or any other action which the Mississippi Commission finds to be inconsistent with holding the voting securities for investment purposes only. Activities which are not deemed to be inconsistent with holding voting securities for investment purposes include:

  • voting on all matters voted on by stockholders;
  • making financial and other inquiries of management of the type normally made by securities analysts for informational purposes and not to cause a change in management, policies or operations; and
  • such other activities as the Mississippi Commission may determine to be consistent with such investment intent.

Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within thirty days after being ordered to do so by the Mississippi Commission may be found unsuitable. The same restrictions apply to a record owner if the record owner, after request, fails to identify the beneficial owner. Any person found unsuitable and who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of our securities beyond such time as the Mississippi Commission prescribes, may be guilty of a misdemeanor. We may be subject to disciplinary action if, after receiving notice that a person is unsuitable to be a stockholder or to have any other relationship with us or any Gaming Subsidiary owned by us, the company involved:

  • pays the unsuitable person any dividend or other distribution upon such person's voting securities;
  • recognizes the exercise, directly or indirectly, of any voting rights conferred by securities held by the unsuitable person;
  • pays the unsuitable person any remuneration in any form for services rendered or otherwise, except in certain limited and specific circumstances; or
  • fails to pursue all lawful efforts to require the unsuitable person to divest himself of the securities, including, if necessary, the immediate purchase of the securities for cash at a fair market value.

We may be required to disclose to the Mississippi Commission, upon request, the identities of the holders of our debt or other securities. In addition, under the Mississippi Act the Mississippi Commission, in its discretion, may require the holder of any debt security of a Registered Corporation to file an application, be investigated and be found suitable to own the debt security if the Mississippi Commission has reason to believe that the ownership of the debt security by the holder would be inconsistent with the declared policies of the State.

Although the Mississippi Commission generally does not require the individual holders of obligations such as notes to be investigated and found suitable, the Mississippi Commission retains the discretion to do so for any reason, including but not limited to, a default, or where the holder of the debt instruments exercises a material influence over the gaming operations of the entity in its question. Any holder of debt securities required to apply for a finding of suitability must pay all investigative fees and costs of the Mississippi Commission in connection with such an investigation.

If the Mississippi Commission determines that a person is unsuitable to own a debt security, then the Registered Corporation may be sanctioned, including the loss of its approvals, if without the prior approval of the Mississippi Commission, it:

  • pays to the unsuitable person any dividend, interest, or any distribution whatsoever;
  • recognizes any voting right by the unsuitable person in connection with those securities;
  • pays the unsuitable person remuneration in any form; or
  • makes any payment to the unsuitable person by way of principal, redemption, conversion, exchange, liquidation, or similar transaction.

Each Mississippi Gaming Subsidiary must maintain in Mississippi a current ledger with respect to the ownership of its equity securities and we must maintain in Mississippi a current list of our stockholders which must reflect the record ownership of each outstanding share of any class of our equity securities. The ledger and stockholder lists must be available for inspection by the Mississippi Commission at any time. If any securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to the Mississippi Commission. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable. We must also render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the beneficial owner.

The Mississippi Act requires that the certificates representing securities of a Registered Corporation bear a legend indicating that the securities are subject to the Mississippi Act and the regulations of the Mississippi Commission. We have received from the Mississippi Commission a waiver of this legend requirement. The Mississippi Commission has the power to impose additional restrictions on the holders of our securities at any time.

Substantially all material loans, leases, sales of securities and similar financing transactions by a Registered Corporation or a Gaming Subsidiary must be reported to or approved by the Mississippi Commission. A Mississippi Gaming Subsidiary may not make a public offering of its securities but may pledge or mortgage casino facilities. A Registered Corporation may not make a public offering of its securities without the prior approval of the Mississippi Commission if any part of the proceeds of the offering is to be used to finance the construction, acquisition or operation of gaming facilities in Mississippi or to retire or extend obligations incurred for those purposes. Such approval, if given, does not constitute a recommendation or approval of the investment merits of the securities subject to the offering. We have received a waiver of the prior approval requirement with respect to public offerings and private placements of securities, subject to certain conditions, including the ability of the Mississippi Commission to issue a stop order with respect to any such offering if the staff determines it would be necessary to do so.

Under the regulations of the Mississippi Commission, a Gaming Subsidiary may not guarantee a security issued by an affiliated company pursuant to a public offering, or pledge its assets to secure payment or performance of the obligations evidenced by the security issued by the affiliated company, without the prior approval of the Mississippi Commission. A pledge of the stock of a Gaming Subsidiary and the foreclosure of such a pledge are ineffective without the prior approval of the Mississippi Commission. Moreover, restrictions on the transfer of an equity security issued by a Gaming Subsidiary or its holding companies and agreements not to encumber such securities are ineffective without the prior approval of the Mississippi Commission. We have obtained approvals from the Mississippi Gaming Commission for such guarantees, pledges and restrictions in connection with offerings of securities, subject to certain restrictions, but we must obtain separate prior approvals from the Mississippi Commission for pledges and stock restrictions in connection with certain financing transactions. Moreover, the regulations of the Mississippi Commission require us to file a Loan to Licensees report with the Mississippi Gaming Commission within thirty (30) days following certain financing transactions and the offering of certain debt securities. If the Mississippi Commission were to deem it appropriate, the Mississippi Commission could order such transaction rescinded.

Changes in control of us through merger, consolidation, acquisition of assets, management or consulting agreements or any act or conduct by a person by which he or she obtains control, may not occur without the prior approval of the Mississippi Commission. Entities seeking to acquire control of a Registered Corporation must satisfy the Mississippi Commission in a variety of stringent standards prior to assuming control of the Registered Corporation. The Mississippi Commission also may require controlling stockholders, officers, directors, and other persons having a material relationship or involvement with the entity proposing to acquire control to be investigated and licensed as part of the approval process relating to the transaction.

The Mississippi legislature has declared that some corporate acquisitions opposed by management, repurchases of voting securities and other corporate defense tactics that affect corporate gaming licensees in Mississippi and Registered Corporations may be injurious to stable and productive corporate gaming. The Mississippi Commission has established a regulatory scheme to ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of these business practices upon Mississippi's gaming industry and to further Mississippi's policy to:

  • assure the financial stability of corporate gaming operators and their affiliates;
  • preserve the beneficial aspects of conducting business in the corporate form; and
  • promote a neutral environment for the orderly governance of corporate affairs.

Approvals are, in certain circumstances, required from the Mississippi Commission before a Registered Corporation may make exceptional repurchases of voting securities (such as repurchases which treat holders differently) in excess of the current market price and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management can be consummated. Mississippi's gaming regulations also require prior approval by the Mississippi Commission of a plan of recapitalization proposed by the Registered Corporation's board of directors in response to a tender offer made directly to the Registered Corporation's shareholders for the purpose of acquiring control of the Registered Corporation.

Neither we nor any Gaming Subsidiary may engage in gaming activities in Mississippi while also conducting gaming operations outside of Mississippi without approval of the Mississippi Commission. The Mississippi Commission may require determinations that, among other things, there are means for the Mississippi Commission to have access to information concerning the out-of-state gaming operations of us and our affiliates. We previously have obtained a waiver of foreign gaming approval from the Mississippi Commission for operations in other states in which we conduct gaming operations and will be required to obtain approval or a waiver of such approval from the Mississippi Commission prior to engaging in any additional future gaming operations outside of Mississippi.

If the Mississippi Commission were to determine that we or Sam's Town Tunica had violated a gaming law or regulation, the Mississippi Commission could limit, condition, suspend or revoke our approvals and the license of Sam's Town Tunica, subject to compliance with certain statutory and regulatory procedures. In addition, we, Sam's Town Tunica and the persons involved could be subject to substantial fines for each separate violation. Because of such a violation, the Mississippi Commission could attempt to appoint a supervisor to operate the casino facilities. Limitation, conditioning or suspension of any gaming license or approval or the appointment of a supervisor could (and revocation of any gaming license or approval would) materially adversely affect us and our business, financial condition and results of operations.

License fees and taxes, computed in various ways depending on the type of gaming or activity involved, are payable to the State of Mississippi and to the counties and cities in which a Gaming Subsidiary's operations are conducted. Depending upon the particular fee or tax involved, these fees and taxes are payable either monthly, quarterly or annually. Gaming taxes are based upon the following:

  • a percentage of the gross gaming revenues received by the casino operation;
  • the number of gaming devices operated by the casino; or
  • the number of table games operated by the casino.

The license fee payable to the State of Mississippi is based upon "gaming receipts" (generally defined as gross receipts less payouts to customers as winnings) and the current maximum tax rate imposed is eight percent of all gaming receipts in excess of $134,000 per month. The foregoing license fees we pay are allowed as a credit against our Mississippi income tax liability for the year paid. The gross revenues fee imposed by Tunica County in which Sam's Town Tunica is located equals approximately four percent of the gaming receipts.

The Mississippi Commission's regulations require as a condition of licensure or license renewal that an existing licensed gaming establishment's plan include adequate parking facilities in close proximity to the casino complex and infrastructure facilities, such as hotels, which amount to at least 100% of the casino cost. The Mississippi Commission's current infrastructure requirement applies to new casinos or acquisitions of closed casinos. Sam's Town Tunica was grandfathered under a prior version of that regulation that required the infrastructure investment to equal only 25% of the casino's cost.

The sale of alcoholic beverages by Sam's Town Tunica is subject to licensing, control and regulation by both the local jurisdiction and the Alcoholic Beverage Control Division, or ABC, of the Mississippi State Tax Commission. Sam's Town Tunica is in an area designated as special resort area, which allows Sam's Town Tunica to serve alcoholic beverages on a 24-hour basis. If the ABC laws are violated, the ABC has the full power to limit, condition, suspend or revoke any license for the serving of alcoholic beverages or to place such licensee on probation with or without conditions. Any such disciplinary action could (and revocation would) have a significant adverse effect upon us and our business, financial condition and results of operations. Certain of our officers and managers at Sam's Town Tunica must be investigated by the ABC in connection with our liquor permits and changes in certain key positions must be approved by the ABC.

Indiana

The Indiana Riverboat Gaming Act, or the Indiana Act, was passed in 1993 and authorized the issuance of up to eleven Riverboat Owner's Licenses to be operated from counties that are contiguous to the Ohio River, Lake Michigan and Patoka Lake. Five riverboats operate from counties contiguous to the Ohio River and five operate from counties contiguous to Lake Michigan. Pursuant to legislation adopted in May 2003, the Indiana General Assembly eliminated the Riverboat Owner's License for a riverboat to be docked in a county contiguous to Patoka Lake. However, the General Assembly authorized the Indiana Gaming Commission to enter into a contract pursuant to which an Operating Agent can operate a riverboat in Orange County, which is contiguous to Patoka Lake, on behalf of the Indiana Gaming Commission. The Indiana Gaming Commission conditionally awarded the contract to Blue Sky Casino, LLC. The Indiana Gaming Commission approved the contract on November 9, 2005.

The Indiana Act and rules promulgated thereunder provide for the strict regulation of the facilities, persons, associations and practices related to gaming operations. The Indiana Act vests the seven member Indiana Gaming Commission with the power and duties of administering, regulating and enforcing riverboat gaming in Indiana. In 2005 the Indiana Act was amended to change the residency requirements of Indiana Gaming Commission members requiring only one member, rather than three, reside in counties contiguous to Lake Michigan and to the Ohio River. The Indiana Gaming Commission's jurisdiction extends to every person, association, corporation, partnership and trust involved in any riverboat gaming operation located in the State of Indiana.

The Indiana Act requires that the owner of a riverboat gambling operation hold a Riverboat Owner's License issued by the Indiana Gaming Commission. The applicants for a Riverboat Owner's License must submit a comprehensive application and the substantial owners and key persons must submit personal disclosure forms. The company, substantial owners and key persons must undergo an exhaustive background investigation prior to the issuance of a Riverboat Owner's License. A person who owns or will own five percent of a Riverboat Owner's License must automatically undergo the background investigation. The Indiana Gaming Commission may investigate any person with any level of ownership interest. The Operating Agent of an Orange County riverboat will undergo the same background investigation as a Riverboat Licensee. If the holder of a Riverboat license, the Riverboat Licensee or the Operating Agent is a publicly-traded corporation, its Articles of Incorporation must contain language concerning transfer of ownership, suitability determinations and possible divestiture of ownership if a shareholder is found unsuitable.

A Riverboat Owner's License and Operating Contract entitle the licensee or the Operating Agent to operate one riverboat. The Indiana Act was amended in May 2003 to allow a person to hold up to one hundred percent of two individual Riverboat Owner's Licenses. In addition, a transfer fee of two million dollars will be imposed on a Riverboat Licensee who purchases or otherwise acquires a controlling interest in a second Indiana Riverboat Owner's License.

All riverboats must comply with applicable federal and state laws including, but not limited to, U.S. Coast Guard regulations. Each riverboat must be certified to carry at least five hundred passengers and be at least one hundred fifty feet in length. Those riverboats located in counties contiguous to the Ohio River must replicate historic Indiana steamboat passenger vessels of the nineteenth century. The Indiana Act does not limit the number of gaming positions allowed on each riverboat. The only limitation on the number of permissible patrons allowed is established by the U.S. Coast Guard Certificate of Inspection in the specification of the riverboat's capacity. In 2005 the Indiana Act was amended to allow the Indiana Gaming Commission to adopt an alternative certification process if the U.S. Coast Guard discontinues issuing Certifications of Inspections to Indiana riverboats.

The Indiana Gaming Commission, after consultation with the Corps, may determine those navigable waterways located in counties contiguous to Lake Michigan or the Ohio River that are suitable for riverboats. If the Corps rescinds approval for the operation of a riverboat gambling facility, the Riverboat Owner's License issued by the Indiana Gaming Commission is void and the Riverboat Licensee may not commence or must cease conducting gambling operations. Employees whose duties consist of operating or navigating the riverboat must hold the appropriate licenses and a merchant marine document from the U.S. Coast Guard.

The initial Riverboat Owner's License runs for a period of five years. Thereafter, the license is subject to renewal on an annual basis upon a determination by the Indiana Gaming Commission that it continues to be eligible to hold a Riverboat Owner's License pursuant to the Indiana Act and rules promulgated thereunder. After the expiration of the initial license, the Riverboat Owner's License must be renewed annually with each Riverboat Licensee undergoing a complete reinvestigation every three years. The Indiana Gaming Commission reserves the right to investigate Riverboat Licensees at any time it deems necessary. The initial license was issued to Blue Chip Casino, Inc., the predecessor to Blue Chip Casino, LLC, in August of 1997. Blue Chip underwent a reinvestigation in 2005 and its license was renewed. The Blue Chip license remains valid until August 2006. The Operating Contract for an Orange County riverboat is to be valid for a period of twenty years. However, the Operating Agent is to be reinvestigated every three years to determine continued suitability. In addition, the Indiana Gaming Commission has the right to reinvestigate the Operating Agent at any time it deems necessary. Riverboat licensees must apply for and hold all other licenses necessary for the operation of a riverboat gambling operation, including, but not limited to, alcoholic beverage licenses and food preparation licenses.

Neither the Riverboat Owner's License nor the Operating Contract may be leased, hypothecated or have money borrowed or loaned against it. An ownership interest in a Riverboat Owner's License or an Operating Contract may only be transferred in accordance with the Indiana Act and rules promulgated thereunder.

The Indiana Act does not limit the amount a patron may bet or lose. Minimum and maximum wagers for each game are set by the Riverboat Licensee or an Operating Agent. Wagering may not be conducted with money or other negotiable currency. No person under the age of 21 is permitted to wager on or be present on a riverboat. Wagers may only be taken from a person present on the riverboat. All electronic gaming devices must pay out between eighty and one hundred percent of the amount wagered. In addition, in May 2003, the Indiana General Assembly adopted legislation authorizing twenty-four hour operation for all Indiana riverboats upon application to, and approval by, the Indiana Gaming Commission. The Indiana Gaming Commission had previously allowed only twenty-one hour gaming. As a result of the legislative change and upon receipt of the requisite approval, Blue Chip commenced twenty-four hour gaming on August 1, 2003.

Pursuant to legislation adopted in May 2003, the Indiana Gaming Commission adopted rules to establish and implement a voluntary exclusion program that requires, among other things, (1) that persons who participate in the voluntary exclusion program be included on a list of persons excluded from all Indiana riverboats, (2) that persons who participate in the voluntary exclusion program may not seek readmittance to Indiana riverboats, (3) Riverboat Licensees and Operating Agents must make reasonable efforts, as determined by the Indiana Gaming Commission, to cease all direct marketing efforts to a person participating in the voluntary exclusion program, and (4) a Riverboat Licensee or Operating Agent may not cash a check of, or extend credit to, a person participating in the voluntary exclusion program. The voluntary exclusion program does not preclude a Riverboat Licensee or Operating Agent from seeking payment of a debt accrued by a person before entry into the voluntary exclusion program. The Indiana Gaming Commission has commenced the voluntary exclusion program and, as of February 17, 2005, 724 individuals had requested voluntary exclusion from Indiana riverboats.

The Indiana General Assembly amended the Indiana Act in 2002 to allow riverboats to choose between continuing to conduct excursions or operate dockside. The Indiana Gaming Commission authorized riverboats to commence dockside operations on August 1, 2002. Blue Chip opted to operate dockside and commenced dockside operations on August 1, 2002. Pursuant to the legislation, the tax rate was increased from 20% to 22.5% during any time an Indiana riverboat does not operate dockside. For those riverboats that operate dockside, the following graduated tax rate is applicable: (i) 15% of the first $25 million of adjusted gross receipts ("AGR"); (ii) 20% of AGR in excess of $25 million, but not exceeding $50 million; (iii) 25% of AGR in excess of $50 million, but not exceeding $75 million; (iv) 30% of AGR in excess of $75 million, but not exceeding $150 million; and (v) 35% of AGR in excess of $150 million. AGR is based on Indiana's fiscal year (July 1 of one year through June 30 of the following year). Pursuant to legislation adopted in May 2003, the graduated tax rate will be retroactively applied to each riverboat's July 2002 AGR even though dockside operations did not commence until August 1, 2002. The Operating Agent in Orange County will pay the wagering tax on the same basis as the other ten Indiana riverboats. The Indiana Act requires that Riverboat Licensees pay a $3.00 admission tax for each person. A riverboat that opts to continue excursions pays the admission tax on a per excursion basis while a riverboat that operates dockside pays the admission tax on a per entry basis. The Orange County Operating Agent must pay a $4.00 admission tax for each person that enters the riverboat. The Indiana Act provides for the suspension or revocation of a license whose owner does not timely submit the wagering or admission tax.

Riverboats licensed by the Indiana Gaming Commission are assessed as real property for property tax purposes and, thus, are taxed at rates determined by local taxing authorities. All Indiana state excise taxes, use taxes and gross retail taxes apply to sales made on a riverboat. In 2004 the Indiana Supreme Court ruled that vessels purchased out of the State of Indiana and brought into the State of Indiana would be subject to Indiana sales tax. Additionally, the Supreme Court declined to hear an Indiana Tax Court case that determined wagering tax payments made by a riverboat could not be deducted from the riverboat's adjusted gross income.

The Indiana Gaming Commission is authorized to conduct investigations into gambling games, the maintenance of equipment, and violations of the Indiana Act as it deems necessary. The Indiana Gaming Commission may subject a Riverboat Licensee and an Operating Agent to fines, suspension or revocation of its license or Operating Contract for any conduct that violates the Indiana Act, rules promulgated thereunder or that constitutes a fraudulent act.

A Riverboat Licensee and Operating Agent must post a bond during the period of the initial five-year license in an amount the Indiana Gaming Commission deems will secure the obligations of a Riverboat Licensee for infrastructure and other facilities associated with the riverboat gambling operation and that may be used as payment to the local community, the state and other aggrieved parties. The bond must be payable to the Indiana Gaming Commission as obligee. The initial bond posted by Blue Chip has been reduced as Blue Chip met its obligations to the local community and the State. As a condition of relicensure, Blue Chip must maintain a bond in the amount of $1 million to meet general legal and financial obligations to the local community and the State. The Riverboat Licensee and the Operating Agent must carry insurance in types and amounts as required by the Indiana Gaming Commission.

By rule promulgated by the Indiana Gaming Commission, a Riverboat Licensee may not enter into or perform any contract or transaction in which it transfers or receives consideration that is not commercially reasonable or that does not reflect the fair market value of goods and services rendered or received. All contracts are subject to disapproval by the Indiana Gaming Commission and contracts should reflect the potential for disapproval.

The Indiana Act places special emphasis on minority and women business enterprise participation in the riverboat industry. Riverboat Licensees and Operating Agents must establish goals of expending ten percent of the total dollars spent on the majority of goods and services with minority business enterprises and five percent with women business enterprises. Riverboat Licensees and Operating Agents may be subject to a disciplinary action for failure to meet the minority and women business enterprise expenditure goals.

By rule promulgated by the Indiana Gaming Commission, a Riverboat Licensee or affiliate may not enter into a debt transaction in excess of $1 million without the prior approval of the Indiana Gaming Commission. A debt transaction is any transaction that will result in the encumbrance of assets. Unless waived, approval of debt transactions requires consideration by the Indiana Gaming Commission at two business meetings. The Indiana Gaming Commission, by resolution, has authorized the Executive Director, subject to subsequent approval by the Indiana Gaming Commission, to approve debt transactions after a review of the documents and consultation with the Chair and the Indiana Gaming Commission's outside financial analyst.

A rule promulgated by the Indiana Gaming Commission requires the reporting of currency transactions to the Indiana Gaming Commission after the transactions are reported to the federal government. Indiana rules also require that Riverboat Licensees track and maintain logs of transactions that exceed $3,000. The Indiana Gaming Commission has promulgated a rule that prohibits distributions, excluding distributions for the payment of taxes, by a Riverboat Licensee to its partners, shareholders, itself or any affiliated entity if the distribution would impair the financial viability of the riverboat gaming operation. The Indiana Gaming Commission has also promulgated a rule mandating Riverboat Licensees to maintain a cash reserve to protect patrons against defaults in gaming debts. The cash reserve is to be equal to a Riverboat Licensee's average payout for a three-day period based on the riverboat's performance the prior calendar quarter. The cash reserve can consist of cash on hand, cash maintained in Indiana bank accounts and cash equivalents not otherwise committed or obligated.

The Indiana Act prohibits contributions to a candidate for a state legislative or local office or to a candidate's committee or to a regular party committee by:

  • a person who owns at least one percent of a Riverboat Licensee or Operating Agent;
  • a person who is an officer of a Riverboat Licensee or Operating Agent;
  • a person who is an officer of a person that owns at least one percent of a Riverboat Licensee or Operating Agent; or
  • a person who is a political action committee of a Riverboat Licensee or Operating Agent.

The prohibition against political contributions extends for three years following a change in the circumstances that resulted in the prohibition.

Individuals employed on a riverboat and in certain positions must hold an occupational license issued by the Indiana Gaming Commission. Suppliers of gaming equipment and gaming or revenue tracking services must hold a supplier's license issued by the Indiana Gaming Commission. By rule promulgated by the Indiana Gaming Commission, Riverboat Licensees who employ non-licensed individuals in positions requiring licensure or who purchase supplies from a non-licensed entity may be subject to a disciplinary action.








Exhibit 99.2

Marina District Development Company, LLC and Subsidiary

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Marina District Development Holding Co., LLC)

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Financial Statements

for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

and Report of Independent Auditors








 

Marina District Development Company, LLC and Subsidiary

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Marina District Development Holding Co., LLC)

 

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements


Report of Internal Auditors                                                              1

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005                             2

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005        3

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Member Equity and Other Comprehensive Income
   for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004                                  4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years
   Ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004                                               5

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements                                           6









 

 

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Member of
Marina District Development Company, LLC
Atlantic City, New Jersey

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Marina District Development Company and subsidiary (the "Company") as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in member equity and other comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards as established by the Auditing Standards Board (United States) and in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Marina District Development Company, LLC and subsidiary at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

February 27, 2007








Marina District Development Company, LLC and Subsidiary

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Marina District Development Holding Co., LLC)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands)

                                                                                           December 31,
                                                                                  ------------------------------
                                                                                        2006            2005
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
Assets
Current assets
    Cash and cash equivalents                                                     $       53,807  $       49,848
    Accounts receivable, net                                                              40,319          33,862
    Income tax receivable                                                                 22,806          17,831
    Inventories                                                                            4,062           3,107
    Prepaid expenses and other                                                             4,008           4,529
    Deferred income taxes                                                                  1,444           1,178
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
            Total current assets                                                         126,446         110,355
Property and equipment, net                                                            1,201,607       1,013,744
Investment in ACES                                                                           400              --
Deferred financing fees, net                                                               7,943           8,619
Other assets, net                                                                         14,812           8,257
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
            Total assets                                                          $    1,351,208  $    1,140,975
                                                                                   ==============  ==============
Liabilities and Member Equity
Current liabilities
    Accounts payable                                                              $       11,111  $       11,290
    Construction payables                                                                 18,139          20,996
    Income taxes payable                                                                   1,834           7,107
    Accrued payroll and related                                                           26,928          27,071
    Accrued interest                                                                       3,602             744
    Accrued gaming liabilities                                                            21,783          20,218
    Accrued and other liabilities                                                         30,728          21,870
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
            Total current liabilities                                                    114,125         109,296
Long-term debt                                                                           554,600         341,700
Deferred income taxes                                                                      6,612           4,472
Other liabilities                                                                          9,138           7,400
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)

Member equity                                                                            666,733         678,107
                                                                                   --------------  --------------
Total liabilities and member equity                                               $    1,351,208  $    1,140,975
                                                                                   ==============  ==============








Marina District Development Company, LLC and Subsidiary

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Marina District Development Holding Co., LLC)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands)


                                                                             Year Ended December 31,
                                                                    ----------------------------------------
                                                                        2006          2005          2004
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
Revenues
    Gaming                                                         $    735,145  $    696,965  $    623,400
    Food and beverage                                                   133,700       121,013       119,946
    Room                                                                 97,646        91,257        85,166
    Other                                                                42,533        35,470        23,769
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
Gross revenues                                                        1,009,024       944,705       852,281
Less promotional allowances                                             195,759       180,722       175,862
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
        Net revenues                                                    813,265       763,983       676,419

Costs and expenses
    Gaming                                                              289,749       265,024       237,091
    Food and beverage                                                    56,333        45,510        46,227
    Room                                                                 11,417        11,205        10,607
    Other                                                                32,805        31,515        19,149
    Selling, general and administrative                                 119,267       106,819       103,001
    Maintenance and utilities                                            56,681        52,176        44,777
    Depreciation and amortization                                        63,088        56,951        56,811
    Loss on disposal of assets                                            2,418           160           184
    Preopening expenses                                                   6,519            --            --
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
        Total                                                           638,277       569,360       517,847
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
Operating income                                                        174,988       194,623       158,572
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
Other income (expense)
    Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized                        (23,271)      (23,930)      (35,118)
    Net gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments                      --          (808)          222
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
        Total                                                           (23,271)      (24,738)      (34,896)
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------

Income before benefit from income taxes                                 151,717       169,885       123,676
Benefit from income taxes                                                 2,116         1,303         9,789
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
Net income                                                         $    153,833  $    171,188  $    133,465
                                                                    ============  ============  ============







Marina District Development Company, LLC and Subsidiary

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Marina District Development Holding Co., LLC)

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Member Equity and Other Comprehensive Income

For The Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

(In thousands)


                                                              Retained     Accumulated
                                                              Earnings        Other        Total          Total
                                              Capital       (Accumulated   Comprehensive   Member     Comprehensive
                                           Contributions      Deficit)     Income (Loss)   Equity     Income (Loss)
                                           --------------  --------------  ------------  ----------  ---------------
Balances, January 1, 2004                        446,700  $      (45,377) $    (15,141) $  386,182
Capital contributions                             30,807              --            --      30,807
Net income                                            --         133,465            --     133,465  $       133,465
Derivative instruments market adjustment,
    net of taxes of $0.9 million                      --              --         9,287       9,287            9,287
                                                                                                     ---------------
Total comprehensive income                            --              --            --          --  $       142,752
                                           --------------  --------------  ------------  ----------  ===============
Balances, December 31, 2004                      477,507          88,088        (5,854)    559,741
Distributions                                         --         (58,676)           --     (58,676)
Net income                                            --         171,188            --     171,188  $       171,188
Derivative instruments market adjustment,
    net of taxes of $0.6 million                      --              --         5,854       5,854            5,854
                                                                                                     ---------------
Total comprehensive income                            --              --            --          --  $       177,042
                                           --------------  --------------  ------------  ----------  ===============
Balances, December 31, 2005                      477,507         200,600            --     678,107
Distributions                                         --        (165,207)           --    (165,207)
Net income                                            --         153,833            --     153,833  $       153,833
                                                                                                     ---------------
Total comprehensive income                            --              --            --          --  $       153,833
                                           --------------  --------------  ------------  ----------  ===============
Balances, December 31, 2006                      477,507  $      189,226  $         --  $  666,733
                                           ==============  ==============  ============  ==========








Marina District Development Company, LLC and Subsidiary

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Marina District Development Holding Co., LLC)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)


                                                                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                                                                 ----------------------------------------
                                                                                     2006          2005          2004
                                                                                 ------------  ------------  ------------
Cash flows from operating activities
   Net income                                                                   $    153,833  $    171,188       133,465
   Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
     operating activities
       Depreciation and amortization                                                  63,088        56,951        56,811
       Amortization of deferred financing fees                                         1,959         2,020         2,238
       Loss on disposal of assets                                                      2,418           160           184
       Net (gain) loss on deriviative financial instruments                               --           808          (222)
       Deferred income taxes                                                           2,056         3,313         6,890
       Provision for doubtful accounts                                                 7,287         4,381         4,995
   Changes in operating assets and liabilities
       Accounts receivable                                                           (13,744)      (14,016)      (11,668)
       Income tax receivable / payable                                               (10,248)        5,190       (23,021)
       Inventories                                                                      (955)         (121)         (765)
       Prepaid expenses and other                                                        521           471        (1,454)
       Other assets                                                                   (7,272)       (4,473)         (557)
       Other current liabilities                                                      12,959        14,891        12,487
       Other liabilities                                                               1,556         3,706         3,483
                                                                                 ------------  ------------  ------------
           Net cash provided by operating activities                                 213,458       244,469       182,866
                                                                                 ------------  ------------  ------------
Cash flows from investing activities
     Acquisition of property and equipment                                          (255,509)      (89,612)      (23,237)
     Investment in ACES                                                                 (400)           --            --
                                                                                 ------------  ------------  ------------
           Net cash used in investing activities                                    (255,909)      (89,612)      (23,237)
                                                                                 ------------  ------------  ------------
Cash flows from financing activities
     Financing fees                                                                   (1,283)           --        (3,572)
     Borrowings under bank credit agreements                                         778,500       573,000       367,792
     Payments under bank credit agreements                                          (565,600)     (656,900)     (548,348)
     Capital contributions                                                                --            --        30,807
     Distributions paid                                                             (165,207)      (58,676)           --
                                                                                 ------------  ------------  ------------
           Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities                        46,410      (142,576)     (153,321)
                                                                                 ------------  ------------  ------------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents                                              3,959        12,281         6,308
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year                                          49,848        37,567        31,259
                                                                                 ------------  ------------  ------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year                                                53,807        49,848        37,567
                                                                                 ============  ============  ============
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
    Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized                          $     18,454  $     26,019  $     29,218
                                                                                 ============  ============  ============
    Cash paid (refunded) for income taxes, net                                         5,952       (15,702)        6,007
                                                                                 ============  ============  ============
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities
    Payables for capital expenditures                                           $     18,139  $     20,996  $         --
                                                                                 ============  ============  ============








Marina District Development Company, LLC and Subsidiary

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Marina District Development Holding Co., LLC)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include the accounts of Marina District Development Company, LLC, d.b.a. Borgata, ("MDDC, LLC") and Marina District Finance Company, Inc. ("MDFC"), its wholly-owned subsidiary, collectively referred to herein as the "Company", "We", or "Us". The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marina District Development Holding Co., LLC ("Holding Company" or "Parent"). Holding Company is jointly owned by MAC, Corp. ("MAC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MGM MIRAGE, and Boyd Atlantic City, Inc. ("BAC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Boyd Gaming Corporation. Our purpose is to develop, own, and operate a hotel casino and spa facility at Renaissance Pointe in Atlantic City, New Jersey. We opened Borgata on July 3, 2003 with approximately 2,000 hotel rooms, a 125,000 square foot casino, and other amenities. On June 30, 2006, we opened our first expansion ("Public Space Expansion"), a project with a cost of approximately $200 million. The Public Space Expansion consists of approximately 35,000 square feet of additional casino space and substantial additions of non-gaming amenities including three additional fine dining restaurants, a second nightclub, and a multi-concept quick service dining facility.

We are currently in the process of our second expansion ("Rooms Expansion"). The centerpiece of the Rooms Expansion is a new hotel tower, The Water Club at Borgata, containing approximately 800 rooms and suites, and is being built on a portion of the existing surface parking lot, near the existing porte cochere. In addition to the hotel, which will have access separate from our existing hotel tower, the Rooms Expansion will include a new spa, additional meeting room space, and a new parking structure. Construction of the Rooms Expansion, which is being built on land leased from MGM MIRAGE, began January 2006 and is expected to open near the beginning of 2008 at an estimated cost of approximately $400 million. BAC and MAC do not expect to make further capital contributions to us for the expansion project as we expect to finance the project from our cash flow and from our bank credit facility (see Note 6).

Pursuant to the Joint Venture Agreement (the "JV Agreement"), BAC, as the managing venturer of the Holding Company, has oversight responsibility for the management of Borgata which includes the design, development, and construction as well as the day-to-day operations. We do not record a management fee to BAC, as our management team directly performs these services or negotiates contracts to provide for these services. As a result, the costs of these services are directly borne by the Company and are reflected in our accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at their date of purchase. The carrying value of these investments approximates their fair value due to their short maturities.

Accounts Receivable, net

Accounts receivable consist primarily of casino, hotel and other receivables, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $15.9 million and $10.2 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based upon our collection experience and the age of the receivables.

Inventories

Inventories consist primarily of food and beverage and retail items and are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the average cost method.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight- line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets (see Note 3). Costs of major improvements are capitalized, while costs of normal repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Losses on disposal of assets are recognized when such assets are impaired while gains are recognized as realized.

Capitalized Interest

Interest costs associated with our expansion projects are capitalized as part of the cost of our constructed assets. Interest costs, which include commitment fees, letter of credit fees and the amortized portion of deferred financing fees, are capitalized on amounts expended for the respective projects using our weighted average cost of borrowing. Capitalization of interest will cease when the respective project, or discernible portions of the projects, are substantially complete. We amortize capitalized interest over the estimated useful life of the related asset. Capitalized interest for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $6.5 million, $2.0 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively.

Deferred Financing Fees

Deferred financing fees incurred in connection with the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the terms of the related debt agreement.

Revenue and Promotional Allowances

Gaming revenue represents the net win from gaming activities, which is the difference between gaming wins and losses. All other revenue is recognized as the service is provided. The majority of our gaming revenue is counted in the form of cash, chips and tokens and therefore is not subject to any significant or complex estimation procedures. Gross revenues include the estimated retail value of rooms, food and beverage, and other goods and services provided to customers on a complimentary basis. Such amounts are then deducted as promotional allowances. The estimated costs and expenses of providing these promotional allowances are charged to the gaming department in the following amounts (in thousands):


                                                                             Year Ended December 31,
                                                                    ----------------------------------------
                                                                        2006          2005          2004
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
Room                                                               $     17,641  $     17,089  $     16,165
Food and beverage                                                        51,381        44,028        40,793
Other                                                                     9,947         7,744         5,649
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
Total                                                              $     78,969  $     68,861  $     62,607
                                                                    ============  ============  ============

Promotional allowances also include incentives such as cash, goods and services (such as complimentary rooms and food and beverages) earned in our slot club and other gaming programs. We reward customers, through the use of loyalty programs, with points based on amounts wagered that can be redeemed for a specified period of time, principally for restricted free play slot machine credits and complimentary goods or services. We record the estimated retail value of these incentives as revenue and then deduct them as a promotional allowance. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, these incentives were $62.8 million, $58.8 million and $62.4 million, respectively.

Income Taxes

Our Parent and we are treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes; therefore, federal income taxes are the responsibility of MAC and BAC. In New Jersey, casino partnerships are subject to state income taxes under the Casino Control Act; therefore, we are required to record New Jersey state income taxes. In 2004, we were granted permission by New Jersey, pursuant to a ruling request, to file a consolidated New Jersey corporation business tax return with MAC and BAC. Pursuant to our tax sharing agreement with MAC and BAC, we owe our partners approximately $5.4 million and $4.0 million for the years ended 2006 and 2005, respectively. The amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements are on a stand-alone basis; however, we file a state consolidated tax return with our partners. The amounts due to our partners are a result of the tax attributes our partners have contributed to the consolidated state tax return.

Pursuant to an amendment to the Casino Control Act, effective July 1, 2003, we are also subject to a 7.5% Adjusted Net Profits Tax which is imposed on a casino's adjusted net income as defined in the Casino Control Commission regulations. This tax of $3.8 million per year is based on our adjusted net income for our first twelve months of operations ended on June 30, 2004 and is imposed for each of the three fiscal years ended June 30, 2004 through June 30, 2006. We are entitled to a 50% credit against our Adjusted Net Profits Tax if we make qualifying capital expenditures, as defined by statute. We recognize this credit in arriving at our state tax benefit reported on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations (see Note 8).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and notes. Significant estimates incorporated into our accompanying consolidated financial statements include the estimated useful lives for depreciable and amortizable assets, the estimated allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, the estimate for available tax credits, the estimated liabilities for our self-insured medical plan, slot club programs, contingencies and litigation, claims and assessments. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.

Preopening Expenses

We expense certain costs of start-up activities as incurred. Preopening expenses were $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, consisting primarily of payroll related expenses and ground lease expenses related to our expansion projects. There were no such expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.

Advertising Expense

Advertising costs are expensed the first time such advertising appears. Total advertising costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations were $14.2 million, $8.7 million and $6.8 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Employee Benefit Plans

We contribute to pension plans under various union agreements. Contributions, based on wages paid to covered employees, totaled approximately $4.6 million, $3.8 million and $3.7 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

We have a retirement savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code covering our non-union employees. The plan allows employees to defer up to the lessor of the Internal Revenue Code prescribed maximum amount or 100% of their income on a pre-tax basis through contributions to the plan. We expensed our voluntary contributions to the 401(k) plan of $3.1 million, $2.8 million and $2.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Self Insurance

We are currently self insured up to $25 million, $0.5 million, and $0.2 million with respect to each property damage claim, general liability claim, and non-union employee medical case, respectively. We have accrued $3.2 million and $3.6 million for such claims at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and incurred expenses of approximately $11.2 million, $12.6 million and $7.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Derivative Financial Instruments and Other Comprehensive Income

All of our interest rate protection agreements matured on or before December 31, 2005 (see Note 7). We accounted for our interest rate protection agreements as derivative financial instruments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments . Our derivative financial instruments were utilized to reduce interest rate risk. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. SFAS No. 133 requires all derivatives to be recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. For derivatives designated as a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of derivatives are either offset against the change in fair value of the hedged item through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings.

We accounted for our comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income . Such amounts of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to our derivative financial instruments reversed through our consolidated statements of operations over the lives of the derivative financial instruments.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In October 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Staff Position No. 13-1 ("FSP 13-1"), Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred during a Construction Period . FSP 13-1 requires rental costs associated with ground operating leases that are incurred during a construction period to be recognized as rental expense. We adopted FSP 13-1 in 2006 and expensed $3.2 million of ground operating lease rental costs for the year ended December 31, 2006 which are included in preopening expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140 . SFAS No. 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to irrevocably account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after December 31, 2006. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 155 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements, as we do not currently have any financial instruments that meet the criteria specified under SFAS No. 155.

In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-3 ("EITF 06- 3"), Disclosure Requirements for Taxes Assessed by a Governmental Authority on Revenue-Producing Transactions . The consensus allows companies to choose between two acceptable alternatives based on their accounting policies for transactions in which the company collects taxes on behalf of a governmental authority, such as sales taxes. Under the gross method, taxes collected are accounted for as a component of sales revenue with an offsetting expense. Conversely, the net method allows a reduction to sales revenue. If such taxes are reported gross and are significant, companies should disclose the amount of those taxes. The guidance should be applied to financial reports through retrospective application for all periods presented, if amounts are significant, for interim and annual reporting beginning February 1, 2007. We have historically presented sales net of tax collected and do not expect the adoption of EITF 06-3 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 ("FIN 48"), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 . FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes . FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and applies to all tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. We do not expect the adoption of FIN 48 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements , which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R) . SFAS No. 158 requires employers to recognize the over-funded or under-funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through other comprehensive income. SFAS No. 158 also requires employers to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year end and is effective for publicly traded companies as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 31, 2006. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 158 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements as we do not currently have a defined benefit postretirement plan that meets the criteria specified under SFAS No. 158.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 ("SAB No. 108"), which adds Section N to Topic 1, "Financial Statements". Section N provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. To provide full disclosure, registrants electing not to restate prior periods should reflect the effects of initially applying the guidance in Topic 1N in their financial statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. We do not expect the adoption of SAB No. 108 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities . SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The fair value option established by SFAS No. 159 permits all companies to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. At each subsequent reporting date, a company shall report in earnings any unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of a company's first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, provided the company also elects to apply the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements .

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the December 31, 2006 presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on our net income as previously reported.

Note 2. Capital Contributions

At December 31, 2003, we had recorded contributions receivable from BAC and MAC in the amounts of $35.5 million and $4.1 million, respectively. These contributions receivable were classified as part of member equity on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2003. Each receivable included $4.1 million related to unfunded contributions pursuant to the total of agreed-upon project costs in the operating agreement. The receivable from BAC also included $31.4 million related to the excess of total estimated project costs over the total agreed-upon project costs.  In June 2004, BAC and MAC signed an agreement that finalized the total amount of our original project costs subject to the resolution of a minor contract dispute and the potential refund of certain construction fees.  Pursuant to this agreement, both BAC and MAC agreed to waive the remaining capital contributions, which were finalized at $4.0 million each and would have funded us to the total of agreed-upon project costs.  In addition, BAC agreed to pay a total of $30.8 million to fulfill their obligation to fund the excess of actual original project costs, calculated before any resolution to the minor outstanding issues, above the total of agreed-upon costs. Accordingly, in June 2004, BAC made a $30.8 million capital contribution to us that was applied to the contribution receivable recorded at December 31, 2003. As such, there are no contributions receivable recorded subsequent to December 31, 2003.

 

Note 3. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):


                                                                December 31,
                                         Estimated Life   --------------------------
                                             (Years)          2006          2005
                                         ---------------  ------------  ------------
Land                                           --        $     87,301  $     87,301
Buildings and improvements                    3-40            960,374       800,190
Furniture and equipment                        3-7            216,995       165,043
Construction in progress                       --             134,549        96,896
                                                          ------------  ------------
Total                                                       1,399,219     1,149,430
Less accumulated depreciation                                 197,612       135,686
                                                          ------------  ------------
    Property and equipment, net                          $  1,201,607  $  1,013,744
                                                          ============  ============

Depreciation expense was $62.4 million, $56.8 million and $53.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. At December 31, 2006, our Rooms Expansion was in process (see Note 1). The majority of the total expenditures for this project as of December 31, 2006 are classified as construction in progress in the above table.

Note 4. Investment in ACES

In 2006, we entered into an agreement with two other Atlantic City casinos to form Atlantic City Express Service, LLC ("ACES"). With each member having a 33.3% interest, this New Jersey limited liability company was formed for the purpose of contracting with New Jersey Transit to operate express rail service between Manhattan and Atlantic City. The responsibilities of the managing member will rotate annually among the members. Our anticipated investment in ACES will be approximately $5.5 million. ACES is currently in the development stage and is expected to be operational by the end of 2007.

We account for our share of ACES under the equity method of accounting. As of December 31, 2006, we have made capital contributions of $0.4 million which is included on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Our share of ACES' net loss for the year ended December 31, 2006 was less than $0.1 million and is included in preopening expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Note 5. Related Parties

Pursuant to the JV Agreement, MAC is solely responsible for any investigation, analyses, clean-up, detoxification, testing, monitoring, or remediation related to Renaissance Pointe. MAC is also responsible for their allocable share of expenses related to master plan and government improvements at Renaissance Pointe. The related amounts due from MAC for these types of expenditures incurred by us were $0.2 million and less than $0.1 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Reimbursable expenditures incurred were $0.7 million, $0.2 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

In 2005, we entered into a series of ground lease agreements with MAC related to our expansion projects which increase our leased premises from a total of 15.5 acres to a total of 19.0 acres (see Note 9). These new ground lease agreements and the modified existing employee parking garage ground lease agreement provide the land on which our existing employee parking garage, the Public Space Expansion, the Rooms Expansion, and a modified surface parking lot will reside. The lease terms extend until December 31, 2070 with the exception of the surface parking lot lease (which can be terminated by either party upon 18 months written notice). The related amounts due to MAC for these types of expenditures were $0 and $0.3 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Related rent incurred was $5.5 million, $4.9 million and $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, portions of which were capitalized on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and portions of which were included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Pursuant to the ground lease agreements, we are responsible for reimbursing MAC for related property taxes paid on our behalf. The related amounts due to MAC for these types of expenditures were $0 at December 31, 2006 and 2005. Related property tax incurred was $3.7 million, $1.7 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, portions of which were capitalized on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and portions of which were included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

In 2003, we entered into a one year airplane lease agreement with BAC. Related rent expense payments were $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. In 2004, we purchased the airplane from BAC for its appraised value of $5.8 million.

We reimburse BAC for compensation paid to employees performing services for us on a full-time basis and for out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred related to travel. BAC is also reimbursed for various payments made on our behalf primarily related to third party legal fees, insurance, investigative fees, and other. The related amounts due to BAC for these types of expenditures paid by BAC were $0.9 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Reimbursable expenditures during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $11.0 million, $6.0 million and $2.3 million, respectively, which were included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

The related party balances are non-interest bearing and are included in either accounts receivable or accrued and other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Note 6. Debt

Amounts outstanding under each component of our bank credit agreements are as follows (in thousands):




                                                                                            December 31,
                                                                                       ----------------------------
                                                                                           2006           2005
                                                                                       -------------  -------------
Term loan                                                                             $          --  $     198,000
Revolving line of credit                                                                    554,600        143,700
                                                                                       -------------  -------------
Total debt                                                                                  554,600        341,700
Less current maturities                                                                          --             --
                                                                                       -------------  -------------
Total long-term debt                                                                  $     554,600  $     341,700
                                                                                       =============  =============

On February 15, 2006, the First Amendment was made to our First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among MDFC, MDDC, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and certain other financial institutions. The amended bank credit agreement modified our existing amended bank credit agreement and consists of a $750 million revolving credit facility that matures on January 31, 2011. Availability under the revolving credit facility was used to repay in full the outstanding term loan component of the previous bank credit agreement. At December 31, 2006, $554.6 million was outstanding under the revolving credit facility and $3.6 million was allocated to support a letter of credit, leaving availability under the bank credit facility of $191.8 million.

The interest rate on the revolving credit facility is based upon either (i) the agent bank's quoted base rate or (ii) the Eurodollar rate, plus an applicable margin that is determined by the level of a predefined financial leverage ratio. In addition, we incur a commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility that ranges from 0.2% to 0.375% per annum. The blended interest rates for outstanding borrowings under the bank credit agreements at December 31, 2006 and 2005 were 6.6% and 5.9%, respectively. The bank credit agreement is secured by substantially all of our real and personal property and is non-recourse to MAC and BAC.

The bank credit agreement contains certain financial and other covenants, including, without limitation, various covenants (i) establishing a maximum permitted total leverage ratio, (ii) establishing a minimum required interest coverage ratio, (iii) imposing limitations on the incurrence of additional secured indebtedness, and (iv) imposing restrictions on investments, dividends and certain other payments. We believe that we are in compliance with the covenants related to the bank credit agreement at December 31, 2006.

The scheduled maturities of long-term debt for the years ending December 31 are as follows (in thousands):


2007                     $        --
2008                              --
2009                              --
2010                              --
2011                         554,600
                          -----------
   Total                 $   554,600
                          ===========

Note 7. Interest Rate Protection Agreements

On March 8, 2001, we entered into several interest rate protection agreements to comply with the requirements of our original bank credit agreement at an initial cost of $0.8 million. All of our interest rate protection agreements matured on or before December 31, 2005. The interest rate protection agreements were cash flow hedges and consisted of interest rate swaps, caps and collars with a combined total initial aggregate notional amount of $310 million that commenced and matured at various dates ranging from December 2001 to December 2005. The interest rate protection agreements were accounted for as derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133. The net effect of our interest rate swaps resulted in an increase in interest of $5.1 million and $10.0 million, respectively, greater than the contractual rate of the underlying hedged debt for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.

The increase or decrease in fair value of certain hedges deemed to be ineffective is reported in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The increase or decrease in fair value of certain hedges deemed to be effective is reported in other comprehensive income (loss) as a component of member equity on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The following table reports the effects of the mark-to-market valuations of our derivative financial instruments for the periods indicated (in thousands):


                                                                             Year Ended December 31,
                                                                    ----------------------------------------
                                                                        2006          2005          2004
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
Net gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments due to
   ineffectiveness in certain hedges                               $         --  $       (808) $        222
                                                                    ============  ============  ============
Derivative financial instruments market adjustment                                      6,434        10,204
Tax effect of derivative financial instruments market adjustment,
   including effect of change of tax status                                  --          (580)         (917)
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
Net derivative financial instruments market adjustment             $         --  $      5,854  $      9,287
                                                                    ============  ============  ============

Note 8. Income Taxes

We are entitled to a 50% credit against our Adjusted Net Profits Tax (see Note 1) if we make qualifying capital expenditures, as defined by statute. In 2003, we placed a valuation allowance of approximately $0.5 million on the credit because we had not made any qualifying capital expenditures, nor did we have any definitive expansion plans. In December 2004, we commenced the Public Space Expansion and submitted the appropriate applications for reimbursement of this tax. As such, we released the $0.5 million valuation allowance on the 2003 credit and realized an additional credit of $2.4 million, representing 50% of the Adjusted Net Profits Tax paid in 2004. This $2.9 million aggregate state tax benefit is included in our accompanying statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 and a state tax benefit of $1.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively, representing 50% of the Adjusted Net Profits Tax paid in 2006 and 2005 is included in our accompanying statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.

Based on New Jersey state income tax rules, we are eligible for a refundable state tax credit under the New Jersey New Jobs Investment Tax Credit because we made a qualified investment in a new business facility that created new jobs. The total estimated available credit related to our original investment is approximately $75 million over a five year period subject to certain annual conditions. An incremental credit related to our Public Space Expansion is estimated to be approximately $1.8 million over a 5 year period. We began receiving refunds related to this tax credit in early 2005. As such, we recorded approximately $23 million of net New Jobs Tax Credits during the year ended December 31, 2004, comprised of New Jobs Tax Credits generated from the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. We recorded approximately $16.9 million and $18.7 million of net New Jobs Tax Credits for the years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. We expect to generate net New Jobs Tax Credits of approximately $17 million for 2007 and approximately $0.3 million per year for years 2008 through 2010. We may also be entitled to incremental New Jersey New Jobs Investment Tax Credits as a result of our Rooms Expansion as discussed in Note 1.

In connection with our formation in 2000, MAC contributed assets consisting of land and South Jersey Transportation Authority bonds with a tax basis of approximately $9.2 million and $13.8 million, respectively. The recorded book value of those assets was $90 million. Pursuant to the Joint Venture and Tax Sharing Agreements between MAC and BAC, any subsequent gain or loss associated with the sale of the MAC contributed property would be allocated directly to MAC for both state and federal income tax purposes. As such, no state deferred tax liability has been recorded in connection with the book and tax basis differences related to the MAC contributed property.

The Internal Revenue Service is currently examining federal income tax returns filed for the years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003. In the event that the examination results in an adjustment to federal taxable income, such adjustment would flow through to MAC and BAC, as we are not subject to federal income tax.

The following tables present our state income tax benefit and related deferred tax assets.

A summary of the benefit from state income taxes is as follows (in thousands):


                                                                             Year Ended December 31,
                                                                    ----------------------------------------
                                                                        2006          2005          2004
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
State
   Current                                                         $     (4,172) $     (4,037) $    (15,761)
   Deferred                                                               2,056         2,734         5,972
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
Benefit from state income taxes                                    $     (2,116) $     (1,303) $     (9,789)
                                                                    ============  ============  ============

The following table provides reconciliations between the state statutory rate and the effective income tax rates where both are expressed as a percentage of income.


                                                                             Year Ended December 31,
                                                                    ----------------------------------------
                                                                        2006          2005          2004
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
Tax provision at state statutory rate                                       9.0 %         9.0 %         9.0 %
New jobs investment tax credit                                            (11.2)        (11.0)        (11.8)
Adjusted net profits tax                                                    1.3           2.2           3.8
Adjusted net profits tax credit                                            (0.6)         (1.1)         (1.9)
Other, net                                                                  0.1           0.1           0.2
Valuation allowance                                                          --            --          (7.2)
                                                                    ------------  ------------  ------------
Total state income tax benefit                                             (1.4)%        (0.8)%        (7.9)%
                                                                    ============  ============  ============

The components comprising the Company's net deferred state tax liability are as follows (in thousands):


                                                              December 31,
                                                        ------------------------
                                                           2006         2005
                                                        -----------  -----------
Deferred state tax assets:
Preopening expense                                     $     1,629  $     2,716
State tax credit carryforwards                               1,657        1,657
Provision for doubtful accounts                              1,435          921
Reserve for employee benefits                                  450          387
Reserve differential for gaming activities                      76          294
Other                                                        1,106          561
                                                        -----------  -----------
Gross deferred state tax asset                               6,353        6,536
                                                        -----------  -----------
Deferred state tax liabilities:
Difference between book and tax basis of property           11,115        9,480
Other                                                          406          350
                                                        -----------  -----------
Gross deferred state tax liability                          11,521        9,830
                                                        -----------  -----------
Net deferred state tax liability                       $    (5,168) $    (3,294)
                                                        ===========  ===========

The items comprising our deferred income taxes as presented on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are as follows (in thousands):


                                                              December 31,
                                                        ------------------------
                                                           2006         2005
                                                        -----------  -----------
Current deferred income tax asset                      $     1,444  $     1,178
Non-current deferred income tax liability                   (6,612)      (4,472)
                                                        -----------  -----------
Net deferred state tax liability                       $    (5,168) $    (3,294)
                                                        ===========  ===========

Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies

Future Minimum Lease Payments

Future minimum lease payments required under noncancelable operating leases (principally for land, see Note 5) as of December 31, 2006 are as follows (in thousands):


2007                     $      8063
2008                            6958
2009                            5876
2010                            5149
2011                           5,154
Thereafter                   288,432
                          -----------
   Total                 $   319,632
                          ===========


For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, total rent expense was $11.9 million, $6.8 million and $7.0 million, respectively, portions of which were capitalized on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and portions of which were included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Utility Contract

In 2005, we amended our executory contracts with a wholly-owned subsidiary of a local utility company extending the end of the terms to 20 years from the opening of our Rooms Expansion. The utility company provides us with electricity and thermal energy (hot water and chilled water). Obligations under the thermal energy executory contract contain both fixed fees and variable fees based upon usage rates. The fixed fee components under the thermal energy executory contract are currently estimated at approximately $6.5 million per annum. We also committed to purchase a certain portion of our electricity demand at essentially a fixed rate which is estimated at approximately $4.8 million per annum. Electricity demand in excess of the commitment is subject to market rates based on our tariff class.

Investment Alternative Tax

The New Jersey Casino Control Act provides, among other things, for an assessment of licensees equal to 1.25% of their gross gaming revenues in lieu of an investment alternative tax equal to 2.5% of gross gaming revenues. Generally, we may satisfy this investment obligation by investing in qualified eligible direct investments, by making qualified contributions or by depositing funds with the New Jersey Casino Reinvestment Development Authority ("CRDA"). Funds deposited with the CRDA may be used to purchase bonds designated by the CRDA or, under certain circumstances, may be donated to the CRDA in exchange for credits against future CRDA investment obligations. CRDA bonds have terms up to fifty years and bear interest at below market rates.

Our CRDA obligations for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $9.2 million, $8.8 million and $8.8 million, respectively, of which valuation provisions of $4.3 million, $4.7 million and $8.0 million, respectively, are included in selling general and administrative expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations due to the respective underlying agreements.

Grant and Donations Agreement

In June 2004, Borgata and the eleven other casinos in the Atlantic City gaming market (collectively, the "Casinos") entered into a Grant and Donations Agreement (the "Agreement") with the New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority (the "NJSEA") and the CRDA in the interest of deferring or preventing the proliferation of competitive gaming at New Jersey racing tracks.

Under the terms of the Agreement, the Casinos shall pay to the NJSEA $34 million to be used for certain authorized purposes (the "Authorized Uses") as defined by the Agreement. The $34 million to be paid by the Casinos shall be payable over a four year period as follows: $7 million was paid October 15, 2004; $8 million was paid October 15, 2005; $9 million was paid on October15, 2006; and $10 million will be paid on or before October 15, 2007. In the event any of the $34 million is not used by NJSEA for the Authorized Uses by January 1, 2009, the unused funds shall be returned by NJSEA to the Casinos pro rata based upon the share each casino contributed. For each year, each casino's share of the $34 million will equate to a percentage representing its gross gaming revenue for the twelve months ending June 30th prior to the October 15 payment date compared to the gross gaming revenues for that period for all Casinos. The Casinos, individually and collectively, shall be responsible for the payment of all amounts due. In the event that any casino shall fail to make its payment as required, the remaining Casinos shall pay a pro rata share of the defaulted payment based upon their share of the gross gaming revenue for the period as compared to the gross gaming revenues for the period for all Casinos calculated without the gross gaming revenue of the defaulting casino. As a result, we will expense our pro rata share of the $34 million, estimated to be approximately $4.7 million in total using our actual and forecasted market share of gross gaming revenue, on a straight line basis over the applicable term of the Agreement. Based upon the gross gaming revenues for all Casinos for the twelve months ended June 30, 2006, our share of the $9 million paid on October 15, 2006 was approximately 13.9%, or $1.3 million. Based upon the gross gaming revenues for all Casinos for the twelve months ended June 30, 2005, our share of the $8 million paid on October 15, 2005 was approximately 13.9%, or $1.1 million. We recorded an expense of $1.0 million, $1.1 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Also under the terms of the Agreement, the CRDA approved donations in the aggregate amount of $62 million from the Casino's North Jersey Obligations (pursuant to the New Jersey Casino Control Act) for certain uses as defined by the Agreement including casino projects approved pursuant to rules of the CRDA. The CRDA shall credit 100% of the donations received from each casino against that casino's obligation to purchase bonds. The donation shall provide that each casino's share of the $62 million will equate to a percentage representing its gross gaming revenue for the twelve months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the gross gaming revenues for that period for all Casinos. Each casino's respective annual donation shall be made first from uncommitted current and future funds in the North Jersey Project Fund established in accordance with the CRDA Urban Revitalization Act of that Casino and shall be credited as fulfilling said obligation on behalf of the particular casino making the payment. To the extent such North Jersey Project funds of that casino are not adequate to pay a Casino's share of the required donations, then that casino's other uncommitted current and future North Jersey Obligations shall be utilized. As a result, we will expense our pro rata share of the $62 million on a straight line basis over the applicable term of the Agreement; however, our Rooms Expansion project may qualify, pursuant to rules of the CRDA, for eligibility to receive future credits of approximately $6.8 million under this Agreement. Based upon the gross gaming revenues for all Casinos for the twelve months ended June 30, 2004, our share of the $62 million is approximately 12.0%, or $7.4 million. We recorded an expense of $1.6 million, $1.6 million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Based on current gross gaming revenue projections, we expect it will take approximately 10 to 12 years to fully fund this obligation as the third quarter of 2006 was the first quarter we were subject to fund North Jersey Obligations.

Legal Matters

We are subject to various claims and litigation in the normal course of business. In our opinion, all pending legal matters are either adequately covered by insurance, or if not insured, will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.