UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
Commission File Number 1-12928
AGREE REALTY CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | 38-3148187 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
70 E. Long Lake Road, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (248) 737-4190
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class |
Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered |
|
Common Stock, $.0001 par value | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Ye
s
x
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer ¨ | Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company ¨ |
Emerging growth company ¨ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
¨
No
x
The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s shares of common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $1,313,587,447 as of June 30, 2017, based on the closing price of $45.87 on the New York Stock Exchange on that date.
At February 20, 2018, there were 30,992,597 shares of common stock, $.0001 par value per share, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the annual stockholder meeting to be held in 2018 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K as noted herein.
AGREE REALTY CORPORATION
Index to Form 10-K
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Agree Realty Corporation intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and includes this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “seek,” “could,” “project,” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements in this report include information about possible or assumed future events, including, among other things, discussion and analysis of our future financial condition, results of operations, our strategic plans and objectives, occupancy and leasing rates and trends, liquidity and ability to refinance our indebtedness as it matures, anticipated expenditures of capital, and other matters. You should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect actual results, performances or achievements. Factors which may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations, include, but are not limited to: the global and national economic conditions and changes in general economic, financial and real estate market conditions; changes in our business strategy; the potential need to fund improvements or other capital expenditures out of operating cash flow; financing risks, such as the inability to obtain debt or equity financing on favorable terms or at all; the level and volatility of interest rates; our ability to re-lease space as leases expire; loss or bankruptcy of one or more of our major tenants; our ability to maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes and the limitations imposed on our business by our status as a REIT; and legislative or regulatory changes, including changes to laws governing REITs. The factors included in this report, including the documents incorporated by reference, and documents the Company subsequently files or furnishes with the SEC are not exhaustive and additional factors could cause actual results to differ materially from that described in the forward-looking statements. For a discussion of additional risk factors, see the factors included under the caption “Risk Factors” within this report. All forward-looking statements are based on information that was available, and speak only, as of the date on which they were made. Except as required by law, the Company disclaims any obligation to review or update these forward–looking statements to reflect events or circumstances as they occur.
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the terms "registrant,” the "Company," “Agree Realty,” "we,” “our” or "us" refer to Agree Realty Corporation and all of its consolidated subsidiaries, including its majority owned operating partnership, Agree Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). Agree Realty has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust subsidiaries which are collectively referred to herein as the “TRS.”
Item 1: | Business |
General
The Company is a fully integrated REIT primarily focused on the ownership, acquisition, development and management of retail properties net leased to industry leading tenants. The Company was founded in 1971 by its current Executive Chairman, Richard Agree, and its common stock was listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) in 1994. The Company’s assets are held by, and all of its operations are conducted through, directly or indirectly, Operating Partnership of which the Company is the sole general partner and in which it held a 98.8% interest as of December 31, 2017. Under the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, we, as the sole general partner, have exclusive responsibility and discretion in the management and control of the Operating Agreement.
As of December 31, 2017, our portfolio consisted of 436 properties located in 43 states and totaling approximately 8.7 million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”). See “Item 2 – Properties – Geographic Diversification” for more information on market concentrations. Our portfolio included 433 net lease properties, which contributed approximately 98.5% of annualized base rent, and three community shopping centers, which generated the remaining 1.5% of annualized base rent.
As of December 31, 2017, our portfolio was approximately 99.7% leased and had a weighted average remaining lease term of approximately 10.2 years. A significant majority of our properties are leased to national tenants and approximately 43.9% of our annualized base rent was derived from tenants, or parent entities thereof, with an investment grade credit rating from S&P Global Ratings, Moody’s Investor Service, Fitch Ratings or the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. Substantially all of our tenants are subject to net lease agreements. A net lease typically requires the tenant to be responsible for minimum monthly rent and property operating expenses including property taxes, insurance and maintenance.
1 |
As of December 31, 2017, we had 32 full-time employees, including executive, investment, due diligence, construction, accounting, asset management and administrative personnel.
Our principal executive offices are located at 70 E. Long Lake Road, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 and our telephone number is (248) 737-4190. We maintain a website at www.agreerealty.com. Our reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and can be accessed through this site, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such reports. These filings are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Our website also contains copies of our corporate governance guidelines and code of business conduct and ethics, as well as the charters of our audit, compensation and nominating and governance committees. The information on our website is not part of this report.
Recent Developments
Investments
During 2017, we completed approximately $359.4 million of investments in net leased retail real estate, including acquisition and closing costs. Total investment volume includes the acquisition of 79 properties for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $338.0 million and the completed development of four properties for an aggregate cost of approximately $21.4 million. These 83 properties are net leased to 51 different tenants operating in 22 sectors and are located in 28 states. These assets are 100% leased for a weighted average lease term of approximately 11.6 years, and the weighted average capitalization rate on our investments was approximately 7.6%.
Dividends
We increased our quarterly dividend per share from $0.495 in March 2017 to $0.505 in June 2017 and further increased our quarterly dividend per share to $0.520 in December 2017.
The fourth quarter dividend per share of $0.520 represents an annualized dividend of $2.08 per share and an annualized dividend yield of approximately 4.0% based on the last reported sales price of our common stock listed on the NYSE of $51.44 on December 29, 2017. We have paid a quarterly cash dividend for 95 consecutive quarters and, although we expect to continue our policy of paying quarterly dividends, we cannot guarantee that we will maintain our current level of dividends, that we will continue our recent pattern of increasing dividends per share, or what our actual dividend yield will be in any future period.
Financing
In April 2017, the Company entered into a new $200.0 million at-the-market equity program (“ATM program”) through which the Company may, from time to time, sell shares of common stock. The Company uses the proceeds generated from its ATM program for general corporate purposes, including funding our investment activity, the repayment or refinancing of outstanding indebtedness, working capital and other general corporate purposes.
In May 2017, the Company filed an automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3, registering an unspecified amount at an indeterminant aggregate initial offering price of common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares and warrants. The Company may periodically offer one or more of these securities in amounts, prices and on terms to be announced when and if these securities are offered. The specifics of any future offerings, along with the use of proceeds of any securities offered, will be described in detail in a prospectus supplement, or other offering materials, at the time of any offering.
2 |
In June 2017, the Company completed a follow-on underwritten offering of 2,415,000 shares of common stock. The offering, which included the full exercise of the overallotment option by the underwriters, raised net proceeds of approximately $108.0 million, after deducting the underwriting discount. The proceeds from the offering were used to repay borrowings under our revolving credit facility to fund property acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.
In August 2017, the Company entered into a note purchase agreement with institutional purchasers. Pursuant to the note purchase agreement, the Operating Partnership completed a private placement of $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.19% senior unsecured notes due September 2029. The senior unsecured notes are guaranteed by the Company. The closing of the private placement was consummated in September 2017, and, on that date, the Operating Partnership issued the senior unsecured notes. The senior unsecured notes were sold only to institutional investors and did not involve a public offering in reliance on the exemption from registration in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
In December 2017, the Company assumed an interest only mortgage note for $21.5 million with PNC Bank, National Association in connection with an acquisition. The mortgage note is due October 2019, secured by a multi-tenant property and has a fixed interest rate of 3.32%.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued 2,368,359 shares of common stock under our ATM program at an average price of $49.17, realizing gross proceeds of $116.5 million. We had approximately $83.5 million remaining capacity under the ATM program as of December 31, 2017.
Dispositions
During 2017, the Company sold real estate properties for net proceeds of $44.3 million and recorded a net gain of $14.2 million (net of any expected losses on real estate held for sale).
Leasing
During 2017, excluding properties that were sold, we executed new leases, extensions or options on more than 683,000 square feet of gross leasable area throughout our portfolio. The annual rent associated with these new leases, extensions or options is approximately $6.5 million. Material new leases, extensions or options included a 147,771 square foot Sam’s Club in Brooklyn, Ohio, a 33,608 square foot Big Lots in Cedar Park, Texas and a 32,147 square foot TJ Maxx in Aurora, Colorado.
Business Strategies
Our primary business objective is to generate consistent shareholder returns by primarily investing in and actively managing a diversified portfolio of retail properties net leased to industry leading tenants. The following is a discussion of our investment, financing and asset management strategies:
Investment Strategy
We are primarily focused on the long-term, fee simple ownership of properties net leased to national or large, regional retailers operating in sectors we believe to be more e-commerce and recession resistant. Our leases are typically long-term net leases that require the tenant to pay all property operating expenses, including real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance. We believe that a diversified portfolio of such properties provides for stable and predictable cash flow.
We seek to expand and enhance our portfolio by identifying the best risk-adjusted investment opportunities across our development, Partner Capital Solutions (“PCS”) and acquisitions platforms.
Development: We have been developing retail properties since the formation of our predecessor company in 1971 and our development platform seeks to employ our capabilities to direct all aspects of the development process, including site selection, land acquisition, lease negotiation, due diligence, design and construction. Our developments are typically build-to-suit projects that result in fee simple ownership of the property upon completion.
Partner Capital Solutions: We launched our PCS program, formerly known as Joint Venture Capital Solutions program, in April 2012. Our PCS program allows us to acquire properties or development opportunities by partnering with private developers or retailers on their in-process developments. We offer construction expertise, relationships, access to capital and forward commitments to purchase to facilitate the successful completion of their projects. We typically take fee simple ownership of PCS projects upon their completion.
3 |
Acquisitions: Our acquisitions platform was launched in April 2010 in order to expand our investment capabilities by pursuing opportunities that do not fall within our development platform, but that do meet both our real estate and return on investment criteria.
We believe that development and PCS projects have the potential to generate superior risk-adjusted returns on investment in properties that are substantially similar to those we acquire.
Each platform leverages the Company’s real estate acumen to pursue investments in net lease retail real estate. Factors that we consider when evaluating an investment include but are not limited to:
· | overall market-specific characteristics, such as demographics, market rents, competition and retail synergy |
· | asset-specific characteristics, such as the age, size, location, zoning, use and environmental history, accessibility, physical condition, signage and visibility of the property |
· | tenant-specific characteristics, including but not limited to the financial profile, operating history, business plan, size, market positioning, geographic footprint, management team, industry and/or sector-specific trends and other characteristics specific to the tenant and parent thereof; |
· | unit-level operating characteristics, including store sales performance and profitability, if available; |
· | lease-specific terms, including term of the lease, rent to be paid by the tenant and other tenancy considerations, and |
· | transaction considerations, such as purchase price, seller profile and other non-financial terms. |
Financing Strategy
We seek to maintain a capital structure that provides us with the flexibility to manage our business and pursue our growth strategies, while allowing us to service our debt requirements and generate appropriate risk-adjusted returns for our shareholders. We believe these objectives are best achieved by a capital structure that consists primarily of common equity and prudent amounts of debt financing. However, we may raise capital in any form and under terms that we deem acceptable and in the best interest of our shareholders.
We have previously utilized common stock equity offerings, secured mortgage borrowings, unsecured bank borrowings, private placements of senior unsecured notes and the sale of properties to meet our capital requirements. We continually evaluate our financing policies on an on-going basis in light of current economic conditions, access to various capital markets, relative costs of equity and debt securities, the market value of our properties and other factors.
As of December 31, 2017, our ratio of total debt to total market capitalization, assuming the conversion of limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”) into shares of common stock, was approximately 24.5%, and our ratio of total debt to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation) was approximately 33.0%.
As of December 31, 2017, our total debt outstanding before deferred financing costs was $522.4 million, including $89.1 million of secured mortgage debt that had a weighted average fixed interest rate of 3.7% (including the effects of interest rate swap agreements) and a weighted average maturity of 3.0 years, $419.3 million of unsecured borrowings that had a weighted average fixed interest rate of 4.0% (including the effects of interest rate swap agreements) and a weighted average maturity of 8.3 years, and $14.0 million of floating rate borrowings under our revolving credit facility at a weighted average interest rate of approximately 2.6%.
Certain financial agreements to which we are a party contain covenants that limit our ability to incur debt under certain circumstances; however, our organizational documents do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that we may incur. As such, we may modify our borrowing policies at any time without shareholder approval.
Asset Management
We maintain a proactive leasing and capital improvement program that, combined with the quality and locations of our properties, has made our properties attractive to tenants. We intend to continue to hold our properties for long-term investment and, accordingly, place a strong emphasis on the quality of construction and an on-going program of regular and preventative maintenance. Our properties are designed and built to require minimal capital improvements other than renovations or alterations, typically paid for by tenants. At our three community shopping center properties, we subcontract on-site functions such as maintenance, landscaping, snow removal and sweeping. The cost of these functions is generally reimbursed by our tenants. Personnel from our corporate headquarters conduct regular inspections of each property and maintain regular contact with major tenants.
4 |
We have a management information system designed to provide our management with the operating data necessary to make informed business decisions on a timely basis. This system provides us rapid access to lease data, tenants’ sales history, cash flow budgets and forecasts. Such a system helps us to maximize cash flow from operations and closely monitor corporate expenses.
Financial and Asset Information about Industry Segments
We are in the business of acquiring, developing and managing retail real estate which we consider one reporting segment. See “Item 2 – Properties" and “Item 6 – Selected Financial Data" and “Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our consolidated financial statements for additional financial and asset information.
Competition
The U.S. commercial real estate investment market is a highly competitive industry. We actively compete with many entities engaged in the acquisition, development and operation of commercial properties. As such, we compete with other investors for a limited supply of properties and financing for these properties. Investors include traded and non-traded public REITs, private equity firms, institutional investment funds, insurance companies and private individuals, many of which have greater financial resources than we do and the ability to accept more risk than we believe we can prudently manage. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully with such entities in our acquisition, development and leasing activities in the future.
Significant Tenants
As of December 31, 2017, we leased 25 properties to Walgreens. Total annualized base rents from Walgreens were approximately 7.7%, 11.6% and 17.2% for the years ended 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, the weighted average remaining lease term of our Walgreens leases was 9.4 years.
No other tenant accounted for more than 5.0% of our annualized base rent as of December 31, 2017. See “Item 2 – Properties” for additional information on our top tenants and the composition of our tenant base.
Regulation
Environmental
Investments in real property create the potential for environmental liability on the part of the owner or operator of such real property. If hazardous substances are discovered on or emanating from a property, the owner or operator of the property may be held strictly liable for all costs and liabilities relating to such hazardous substances. We have obtained a Phase I environmental study (which involves inspection without soil sampling or ground water analysis) conducted by independent environmental consultants on each of our properties and, in certain instances, have conducted additional investigation, including a Phase II environmental assessment. Furthermore, we have adopted a policy of conducting a Phase I environmental study on each property we acquire and an additional investigation as warranted.
We have no knowledge of any hazardous substances existing on our properties in violation of any applicable laws; however, no assurance can be given that such substances are not located on any of our properties. We carry no insurance coverage for the types of environmental risks described above.
We believe that we are in compliance, in all material respects, with all federal, state and local ordinances and regulations regarding hazardous or toxic substances. Furthermore, we have not been notified by any governmental authority of any noncompliance, liability or other claim in connection with any of our properties.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Our properties, as commercial facilities, are required to comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and similar state and local laws and regulations (collectively, the “ADA”). Investigation of a property may reveal non-compliance with the ADA. Our tenants will typically have primary responsibility for complying with the ADA, but we may incur costs if the tenant does not comply. As of December 31, 2017, we have not been notified by any governmental authority, nor are we otherwise aware, of any non-compliance with the ADA that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.
5 |
Available Information
We make available free of charge through our we bsite at www.agreerealty.com all reports we electronically file with, or furnish to, the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on From 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, as well as any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after those documents are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. These filings are also accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Item 1a: | Risk Factors |
The following factors and other factors discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements made in this report or presented elsewhere in future SEC reports. You should carefully consider each of the risks, assumptions, uncertainties and other factors described below and elsewhere in this report, as well as any reports, amendments or updates reflected in subsequent filings or furnishings with the SEC. We believe these risks, assumptions, uncertainties and other factors, individually or in the aggregate, could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results and could materially and adversely affect our business operations, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Risks Related to Our Business and Operations
Economic and financial conditions may have a negative effect on our business and operations.
Changes in global or national economic conditions, such as a global economic and financial market downturn or a disruption in the capital markets, may cause, among other things, a significant tightening in the credit markets, lower levels of liquidity, increases in the rate of default and bankruptcy and lower consumer spending and business spending, which could adversely affect our business and operations. Potential consequences of changes in economic and financial conditions include:
· | changes in the performance of our tenants, which may result in lower rent and lower recoverable expenses that the tenant can afford to pay and tenant defaults under the leases; |
· | current or potential tenants may delay or postpone entering into long-term net leases with us; |
· | the ability to borrow on terms and conditions that we find acceptable may be limited or unavailable, which could reduce our ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt, reduce our returns from acquisition and development activities, reduce our ability to make cash distributions to our shareholders and increase our future interest expense; |
· | our ability to access the capital markets may be restricted at a time when we would like, or need, to access those markets, which could have an impact on our flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions; |
· | the recognition of impairment charges on or reduced values of our properties, which may adversely affect our results of operations or limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices and may reduce the availability of buyer financing; and |
· | one or more lenders under our revolving credit facility could fail and we may not be able to replace the financing commitment of any such lenders on favorable terms, or at all. |
We are also limited in our ability to reduce costs to offset the results of a prolonged or severe economic downturn given certain fixed costs and commitments associated with our operations. Such conditions could make it very difficult to forecast operating results, make business decisions and identify and address material business risks.
Our business is significantly dependent on single tenant properties.
We focus our development and investment activities on ownership of real properties that are primarily net leased to a single tenant. Therefore, the financial failure of, or other default in payment by, a single tenant under its lease and the potential resulting vacancy is likely to cause a significant reduction in our operating cash flows from that property and a significant reduction in the value of the property and could cause a significant impairment loss. In addition, we would be responsible for all of the operating costs of a property following a vacancy at a single tenant building. Because our properties have generally been built to suit a particular tenant’s specific needs and desires, we may also incur significant losses to make the leased premises ready for another tenant and experience difficulty or a significant delay in releasing such property.
6 |
Failure by any major tenant with leases in multiple locations to make rental payments to us, because of a deterioration of its financial condition or otherwise, would have a material adverse effect on us.
We derive substantially all of our revenue from tenants who lease space from us at our properties. Therefore, our ability to generate cash from operations is dependent on the rents that we are able to charge and collect from our tenants. At any time, our tenants may experience a downturn in their respective businesses that may significantly weaken their financial condition, particularly during periods of economic uncertainty. In addition, our tenants compete with alternative forms or retailing, including online shopping, home shopping networks and mail order catalogs. As a result, our tenants may delay lease commencements, decline to extend or renew leases upon expiration, fail to make rental payments when due, close a number of stores or declare bankruptcy. Any of these actions could result in the loss of rental income attributable to the affected leases. In that event, we may be unable to re-lease the vacated space at attractive rents or at all. The occurrence of any of the situations described above would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our financial condition. See “We may be subject to tenant credit concentrations that make us more susceptible to adverse events with respect to those tenants” below.
Bankruptcy laws will limit our remedies if a tenant becomes bankrupt and rejects its leases.
If a tenant becomes bankrupt or insolvent, that could diminish the income we receive from that tenant’s leases. We may not be able to evict a tenant solely because of its bankruptcy. On the other hand, a bankruptcy court might authorize the tenant to terminate its leasehold with us. If that happens, our claim against the bankrupt tenant for unpaid future rent would be an unsecured pre-petition claim subject to statutory limitations, and therefore any amounts received in bankruptcy are likely to be substantially less valuable than the remaining rent we otherwise were owed under the leases. In addition, any claim we have for unpaid past rent could be substantially less than the amount owed.
Our portfolio is concentrated in certain States, which makes us more susceptible to adverse events in these areas.
Our properties are located in 43 States throughout the United States and in particular, the States of Michigan (where 47 properties out of 436 properties are located or 12.1% of our annualized base rent was derived as of December 31, 2017), Texas (31 properties or 8.5% of our annualized base rent) and Florida (33 properties or 7.4% of our annualized base rent). An economic downturn or other adverse events or conditions such as natural disasters in any of these areas, or any other area where we may have significant concentration in the future, could result in a material reduction of our cash flows or material losses to our company.
There are risks associated with our development and acquisition activities.
We intend to continue the development of new properties and to consider possible acquisitions of existing properties. We anticipate that our new developments will be financed under the revolving credit facility or other forms of financing that will result in a risk that permanent fixed rate financing on newly developed projects might not be available or would be available only on disadvantageous terms. In addition, new project development is subject to a number of risks, including risks of construction delays or cost overruns that may increase anticipated project costs. Furthermore, new project commencement risks also include receipt of zoning, occupancy, other required governmental permits and authorizations and the incurrence of development costs in connection with projects that are not pursued to completion. If permanent debt or equity financing is not available on acceptable terms to finance new development or acquisitions undertaken without permanent financing, further development activities or acquisitions might be curtailed or cash available for distribution might be adversely affected. Acquisitions entail risks that investments will fail to perform in accordance with expectations, as well as general investment risks associated with any new real estate investment.
7 |
We own certain of our properties subject to ground leases that expose us to the loss of such properties upon breach or termination of the ground leases and may limit our ability to sell these properties.
We own a limited number of properties through leasehold interests in the land underlying the buildings and we may acquire additional buildings in the future that are subject to similar ground leases. As lessee under a ground lease, we are exposed to the possibility of losing the property upon termination, or an earlier breach by us, of the ground lease, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, our ability to make distributions to our shareholders and the trading price of our common stock. Our ground leases contain certain provisions that may limit our ability to sell certain of our properties. In order to assign or transfer our rights and obligations under certain of our ground leases, we generally must obtain the consent of the landlord which, in turn, could adversely impact the price realized from any such sale.
The capital markets may limit our sources of funds for financing activities.
Our ability to access the capital markets may be restricted at a time when we would like, or need, to access those markets. This could have an impact on our flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions. A lack of available credit, lack of confidence in the financial sector, increased volatility in the financial markets and reduced business activity could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to obtain and manage our liquidity. In addition, the cost of debt financing and the proceeds may be materially adversely impacted by such market conditions. Also, our ability to access equity markets as a source of funds may be affected by our stock price as well as general market conditions.
Loss of revenues from tenants would reduce the Company’s cash flow.
Our tenants encounter significant macroeconomic, governmental and competitive forces. Adverse changes in consumer spending or consumer preferences for particular goods, services or store-based retailing could severely impact their ability to pay rent. Shifts from in-store to online shopping could increase due to changing consumer shopping patterns as well as the increase in consumer adoption and use of mobile electronic devices. This expansion of e-commerce could have an adverse impact on our tenant’s ongoing viability. The default, financial distress, bankruptcy or liquidation of one or more of our tenants could cause substantial vacancies in our property portfolio. Vacancies reduce our revenues, increase property expenses and could decrease the value of each vacant property. Upon the expiration of a lease, the tenant may choose not to renew the lease, and/or we may not be able to release the vacant property at a comparable lease rate or without incurring additional expenditures in connection with such renewal or re-leasing.
The availability and timing of cash distributions is uncertain
We expect to continue to pay quarterly distributions to our shareholders. However, we bear all expenses incurred by our operations, and our funds generated by operations, after deducting these expenses, may not be sufficient to cover desired levels of distributions to our shareholders. We cannot assure our shareholders that sufficient funds will be available to pay distributions.
The decision to declare and pay dividends on our common stock in the future, as well as the timing, amount, and composition of any such future dividends, will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our earnings, funds from operations, liquidity, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual prohibitions, or other limitations under our indebtedness, annual dividend requirements or the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), state law and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant. Further, we may issue new shares of common stock as compensation to our employees or in connection with public offerings or acquisitions. Any future issuances may substantially increase the cash required to pay dividends at current or higher levels. Our actual dividend payable will be determined by our board of directors based upon the circumstances at the time of declaration.
Any preferred shares we may offer may have a fixed dividend rate that would not increase with any increases in the dividend rate of our common stock. Conversely, payment of dividends on our common stock may be subject to payment in full of the dividends on any preferred shares and payment of interest on any debt securities we may offer.
If we do not maintain or increase the dividend on our common stock, it could have an adverse effect on the market price of our shares.
8 |
We face significant competition .
We face competition in seeking properties for acquisition and tenants who will lease space in these properties from insurance companies, credit companies, pension or private equity funds, private individuals, investment companies, other REITs and other industry participants, many of which have greater financial and other resources than we do. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully compete with such entities in our development, acquisition and leasing activities in the future.
We face risks relating to information technology and cybersecurity attacks, loss of confidential information and other business disruptions.
We rely on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit and store electronic information and to manage or support a variety of our business processes and we rely on commercially available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide infrastructure and security for processing, transmitting and storing information. Any failure, inadequacy or interruption could materially harm our business. Furthermore, our business is subject to risks from and may be impacted by cybersecurity attacks, including attempts to gain unauthorized access to our confidential data and other electronic security breaches. Such cyber-attacks can range from individual attempts to gain unauthorized access to our information technology systems to more sophisticated security threats. While we employ a number of measures to prevent, detect and mitigate these threats, there is no guarantee such efforts will be successful in preventing a cyber-attack. Cybersecurity incidents could cause operational interruption, damage to our business relationships, private data exposure (including personally identifiable information, or proprietary and confidential information, of ours and our employees, as well as third parties) and affect the efficiency of our business operations. Any such incidents could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of personal information and reduce the benefits of our technologies.
General Real Estate Risk
Our performance and value are subject to general economic conditions and risks associated with our real estate assets.
There are risks associated with owning and leasing real estate. Although many of our leases contain terms that obligate the tenants to bear substantially all of the costs of operating our properties, investing in real estate involves a number of risks. Income from and the value of our properties may be adversely affected by:
· | Changes in general or local economic conditions; |
· | The attractiveness of our properties to potential tenants; |
· | Changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing properties in an area; |
· | Bankruptcies, financial difficulties or lease defaults by our tenants; |
· | Changes in operating costs and expense and our ability to control rents; |
· | Our ability to lease properties at favorable rental rates; |
· | Our ability to sell a property when we desire to do so at a favorable price; |
· | Unanticipated changes in costs associated with known adverse environmental conditions or retained liabilities for such conditions; |
· | Changes in or increased costs of compliance with governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies, including changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning laws, and our potential liability thereunder; and |
· | Unanticipated expenditures to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other similar regulations. |
Economic and financial market conditions have and may continue to exacerbate many of the foregoing risks. If a tenant fails to perform on its lease covenants, that would not excuse us from meeting any mortgage debt obligation secured by the property and could require us to fund reserves in favor of our mortgage lenders, thereby reducing funds available for payment of cash dividends on our shares of common stock.
9 |
The fact that real estate investments are relatively illiquid may reduce economic returns to investors .
We may desire to sell a property in the future because of changes in market conditions or poor tenant performance or to avail ourselves of other opportunities. We may also be required to sell a property in the future to meet secured debt obligations or to avoid a secured debt loan default. Real estate properties cannot generally be sold quickly, and we cannot assure you that we could always obtain a favorable price. We may be required to invest in the restoration or modification of a property before we can sell it. This lack of liquidity may limit our ability to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions and, as a result, could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and our ability to pay distributions on our common stock.
Our ability to renew leases or re-lease space on favorable terms as leases expire significantly affects our business.
We are subject to the risks that, upon expiration of leases for space located in our properties, the premises may not be re-let or the terms of re-letting (including the cost of concessions to tenants) may be less favorable than current lease terms. If a tenant does not renew its lease or if a tenant defaults on its lease obligations, there is no assurance we could obtain a substitute tenant on acceptable terms. If we cannot obtain another tenant with comparable structural needs, we may be required to modify the property for a different use, which may involve a significant capital expenditure and a delay in re-leasing the property. Further, if we are unable to re-let promptly all or a substantial portion of our retail space or if the rental rates upon such re-letting were significantly lower than expected rates, our net income and ability to make expected distributions to shareholders would be adversely affected. There can be no assurance that we will be able to retain tenants in any of our properties upon the expiration of their leases.
Potential liability for environmental contamination could result in substantial costs.
Under federal, state and local environmental laws, we may be required to investigate and clean up any release of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products at our properties, regardless of our knowledge or actual responsibility, simply because of our current or past ownership or operation of the real estate. If unidentified environmental problems arise, we may have to make substantial payments, which could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders. This potential liability results from the following:
· | As owner, we may have to pay for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred in connection with the contamination; |
· | The law may impose clean-up responsibility and liability regardless of whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the contamination; |
· | Even if more than one person is responsible for the contamination, each person who shares legal liability under environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs; and |
· | Governmental entities and third parties may sue the owner or operator of a contaminated site for damages and costs. |
These costs could be substantial and in extreme cases could exceed the value of the contaminated property. The presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products or the failure to properly remediate contamination may adversely affect our ability to borrow against, sell or lease an affected property. In addition, some environmental laws create liens on contaminated sites in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs in connection with a contamination.
We own and may in the future acquire properties that will be operated as convenience stores with gas station facilities. The operation of convenience stores with gas station facilities at our properties will create additional environmental concerns. We require that the tenants who operate these facilities do so in material compliance with current laws and regulations.
A majority of our leases require our tenants to comply with environmental laws and to indemnify us against environmental liability arising from the operation of the properties. However, we could be subject to strict liability under environmental laws because we own the properties. There are certain losses, including losses from environmental liabilities, that are not generally insured against or that are not generally fully insured against because it is not deemed economically feasible or prudent to do so. There is also a risk that tenants may not satisfy their environmental compliance and indemnification obligations under the leases. Any of these events could substantially increase our cost of operations, require us to fund environmental indemnities in favor of our secured lenders and reduce our ability to service our secured debt and pay dividends to shareholders and any debt security interest payments. Environmental problems at any properties could also put us in default under loans secured by those properties, as well as loans secured by unaffected properties.
10 |
Uninsured losses relating to real property may adversely affect our returns.
Our leases generally require tenants to carry comprehensive liability and extended coverage insurance on our properties. However, there are certain losses, including losses from environmental liabilities, terrorist acts or catastrophic acts of nature, that are not generally insured against or that are not generally fully insured against because it is not deemed economically feasible or prudent to do so. If there is an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insurance limits, we could lose both the revenues generated by the affected property and the capital we have invested in the property. In the event of a substantial unreimbursed loss, we would remain obligated to repay any mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the property.
Risks Related to Our Debt Financings
Our level of indebtedness could materially and adversely affect our financial position, including reducing funds available for other business purposes and reducing our operational flexibility, and we may have future capital needs and may not be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms.
At December 31, 2017, our ratio of total debt to total market capitalization (assuming conversion of OP Units into shares of common stock) was approximately 24.5%. Incurring substantial debt may adversely affect our business and operating results by:
· | requiring us to use a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay interest and principal, which reduces the amount available for distributions, acquisitions and capital expenditures; |
· | making us more vulnerable to economic and industry downturns and reducing our flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions; |
· | requiring us to agree to less favorable terms, including higher interest rates, in order to incur additional debt, and otherwise limiting our ability to borrow for operations, working capital or to finance acquisitions in the future; or |
· | limiting our flexibility in conducting our business, including our ability to finance or refinance our assets, contribute assets to joint ventures or sell assets as needed, which may place us at a disadvantage compared to competitors with less debt or debt with less restrictive terms. |
In addition, the use of leverage presents an additional element of risk in the event that (1) the cash flow from lease payments on our properties is insufficient to meet debt obligations, (2) we are unable to refinance our debt obligations as necessary or on as favorable terms, (3) there is an increase in interest rates, (4) we default on our financial obligations and (5) debt service requirements increase. If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to meet mortgage payments, the property could be foreclosed upon with a consequential loss of income and asset value to us. Under the “cross-default” provisions contained in mortgages encumbering some of our properties, our default under a mortgage with a lender would result in our default under mortgages held on other properties resulting in multiple foreclosures.
We generally intend to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness (including construction or acquisition financing) to total market capitalization of 65% or less. Nevertheless, we may operate with debt levels which are in excess of 65% of total market capitalization for extended periods of time. Our organizational documents contain no limitation on the amount or percentage of indebtedness which we may incur. Therefore, our board of directors, without a vote of the shareholders, could alter the general policy on borrowings at any time. If our debt capitalization policy were changed, we could become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increase in debt service that could adversely affect our operating cash flow and our ability to make expected distributions to shareholders, and could result in an increased risk of default on our obligations.
Covenants in our credit agreements could limit our flexibility and adversely affect our financial condition.
The terms of the financing agreements and other indebtedness require us to comply with a number of customary financial and other covenants . These covenants may limit our flexibility in our operations, and breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the instruments governing the applicable indebtedness even if we have satisfied our payment obligations. Our financing agreements contain certain cross-default provisions which could be triggered in the event that we default on our other indebtedness. These cross-default provisions may require us to repay or restructure the revolving credit facility in addition to any mortgage or other debt that is in default. If our properties were foreclosed upon, or if we are unable to refinance our indebtedness at maturity or meet our payment obligations, the amount of our distributable cash flows and our financial condition would be adversely affected.
11 |
Our unsecured revolving credit facility and certain term loan agreements contain various restrictive corporate covenants, including a maximum total leverage ratio, a maximum secured leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a maximum recourse secured debt ratio, a minimum net worth requirement and a maximum payout ratio. In addition, our unsecured revolving credit facility and certain term loan agreements have unencumbered pool covenants, which include a minimum number of eligible unencumbered assets, a maximum unencumbered leverage ratio and a minimum unencumbered interest coverage ratio. These covenants may restrict our ability to pursue certain business initiatives or certain transactions that might otherwise be advantageous. Furthermore, failure to meet certain of these financial covenants could cause an event of default under and/or accelerate some or all of such indebtedness which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Credit market developments may reduce availability under our revolving credit facility.
There is risk that lenders, even those with strong balance sheets and sound lending practices, could fail or refuse to honor their legal commitments and obligations under existing revolving credit facility, including but not limited to: extending credit up to the maximum amount permitted by such credit facility, allowing access to additional credit features and/or honoring loan commitments. If our lender(s) fail to honor their legal commitments under our revolving credit facility, it could be difficult to replace our revolving credit facility on similar terms. Any such failure by any of the lenders under the revolving credit facility may impact our ability to finance our operating or investing activities.
An increase in market interest rates could raise our interest costs on existing and future debt or adversely affect our stock price, and a decrease in interest rates may lead to additional competition for the acquisition of real estate or adversely affect our results of operations.
Our interest costs for any new debt and our current debt obligations may rise if interest rates increase. This increased cost could make the financing of any new acquisition more expensive as well as lower our current period earnings. Rising interest rates could limit our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures or cause us to pay higher interest rates upon refinancing. In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the access third parties have to credit, thereby decreasing the amount they are willing to pay to lease our assets and limit our ability to reposition our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. An increase in market interest rates may lead prospective purchasers of our common stock to expect a higher dividend yield, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Decreases in interest rates may lead to additional competition for the acquisition of real estate due to a reduction in desirable alternative income-producing investments. Increased competition for the acquisition of real estate may lead to a decrease in the yields on real estate targeted for acquisition. In such circumstances, if we are not able to offset the decrease in yields by obtaining lower interest costs on our borrowings, our results of operations may be adversely affected.
Our hedging strategies may not be successful in mitigating our risks associated with interest rates and could reduce the overall returns on your investment.
We use various derivative financial instruments to provide a level of protection against interest rate risks, but no hedging strategy can protect us completely. These instruments involve risks, such as the risk that the counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements, that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes, that a court could rule that such agreements are not legally enforceable, and that we may have to post collateral to enter into hedging transactions, which we may lose it we are unable to honor our obligations. These instruments may also generate income that may not be treated as qualifying REIT income for purposes of the REIT income tests. In addition, the nature and timing of hedging transactions may influence the effectiveness of our hedging strategies. Poorly designed strategies or improperly executed transactions could actually increase our risk and losses. Moreover, hedging strategies involve transaction and other costs. We cannot assure you that our hedging strategy and the derivatives that we use will adequately offset the risk of interest rate volatility or that our hedging transactions will not result in losses that may reduce the overall return on your investment.
12 |
Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure
Our charter, bylaws and Maryland law contain provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control transaction.
Our charter contains 9.8% ownership limits. Our charter, subject to certain exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT and contains provisions that limit any person to actual or constructive ownership of no more than 9.8% (in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the outstanding shares of our common stock and no more than 9.8% (in value) of the aggregate of the outstanding shares of all classes and series of our stock. Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may exempt, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, any person from the ownership limits. These restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if our board of directors determines that it is no longer in our best interests to attempt to qualify, or to continue to qualify, as a REIT. The ownership limits may delay or impede, and we may use the ownership limits deliberately to delay or impede, a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders.
We have a staggered board. Our directors are divided into three classes serving three-year staggered terms. The staggering of our board of directors may discourage offers for the Company or make an acquisition more difficult, even when an acquisition may be viewed to be in the best interest of our shareholders.
We have a shareholder rights plan. Under the terms of this plan, we can in effect prevent a person or group from acquiring more than 15% of the outstanding shares of our common stock because, unless we approve the acquisition, after the person acquires more than 15% of our outstanding common stock, all other shareholders will have the right to purchase securities from us at a price that is less than their then fair market value. This would substantially reduce the value and influence of the stock owned by the acquiring person. Our board of directors can prevent the plan from operating by approving the transaction in advance, which gives us significant power to approve or disapprove of the efforts of a person or group to acquire a large interest in our company. On December 20, 2017, the Company entered into a third amendment to the plan to provide a limited exemption, which permitted an investor to become the beneficial owner of less than 20% of the common stock of the Company then outstanding rather than the 15% threshold otherwise applicable without becoming an Acquiring Person (as defined in the plan).
We could issue stock without stockholder approval. Our board of directors could, without stockholder approval, issue authorized but unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock. In addition, our board of directors could, without stockholder approval, classify or reclassify any unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock and set the preferences, rights and other terms of such classified or reclassified shares. Our board of directors could establish a series of stock that could, depending on the terms of such series, delay, defer or prevent a transaction or change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be viewed to be in the best interest of our shareholders.
Provisions of Maryland law may limit the ability of a third party to acquire control of our company. Certain provisions of Maryland law may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change of control under certain circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of shares of our common stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then prevailing market price of such shares, including:
· | “Business combination” provisions that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an “interested stockholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our shares or an affiliate thereof) for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder and thereafter would require the recommendation of our board of directors and impose special appraisal rights and special stockholder voting requirements on these combinations; and |
· | “Control share” provisions that provide that “control shares” of our company (defined as shares which, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the stockholder, entitle the stockholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of “control shares”) have no voting rights except to the extent approved by our shareholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares. |
The business combination statute permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business combinations that are approved or exempted by the board of directors before the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Our board of directors has exempted from the business combination provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or MGCL, any business combination with Mr. Richard Agree or any other person acting in concert or as a group with Mr. Richard Agree.
13 |
In addition, our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the control share acquisition statute Richard Agree, Edward Rosenberg, any spouses or the foregoing, any brothers or sisters of the foregoing, any ancestors of the foregoing, any other lineal descendants of any of the foregoing, any estates of any of the foregoing, any trusts established for the benefit of any of the foregoing and any other entity controlled by any of the foregoing, our other officers, our employees, any of the associates or affiliates of the foregoing and any other person acting in concert of as a group with any of the foregoing.
Additionally, Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the MGCL, permits our board of directors, without stockholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in our charter or our bylaws, to implement certain takeover defenses. These provisions may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making an acquisition proposal for our company or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our common stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-current market price.
Our charter, our bylaws, the limited partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership and Maryland law also contain other provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be viewed to be in the best interest of our shareholders.
Future offerings of debt and equity may not be available to us or may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
We expect to continue to increase our capital resources by making additional offerings of equity and debt securities in the future, which could include classes or series of preferred stock, common stock and senior or subordinated notes. Our ability to raise additional capital may be restricted at a time when we would like or need, including as a result of market conditions. Future market dislocations could cause us to seek sources of potentially less attractive capital and impact our flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions. All debt securities and other borrowings, as well as all classes or series of preferred stock, will be senior to our common stock in a liquidation of our company. Additional equity offerings could dilute our shareholders’ equity and reduce the market price of shares of our common stock. In addition, depending on the terms and pricing of an additional offering of our common stock and the value of our properties, our shareholders may experience dilution in both the book value and fair value of their shares. The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of our common stock in the market after an offering or the perception that such sales could occur, and this could materially and adversely affect our ability to raise capital through future offerings of equity or equity-related securities . In addition, we may issue preferred stock or other securities convertible into equity securities with a distribution preference or a liquidation preference that may limit our ability to make distributions on our common stock. Our ability to estimate the amount, timing or nature of additional offerings is limited as these factors will depend upon market conditions and other factors.
The market price of our stock may vary substantially.
The market price of our common stock could be volatile, and investors in our common stock may experience a decrease in the value of their shares, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. Among the market conditions that may affect the market price of our common stock are the following:
· | Changes in interest rates; |
· | Our financial condition and operating performance and the performance of other similar companies; |
· | Actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly results of operations; |
· | The extent of investor interest in our company, real estate generally or commercial real estate specifically; |
· | The reputation of REITs generally and the attractiveness of their equity securities in comparison to other equity securities, including securities issued by other real estate companies, and fixed income securities; |
· | Changes in expectations of future financial performance or changes in estimates of securities analysts; |
· | Fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes; and |
· | Announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, investments or strategic alliances. |
An officer and director may have interests that conflict with the interests of shareholders.
An officer and member of our board of directors owns OP units in the Operating Partnership. This individual may have personal interests that conflict with the interests of our shareholders with respect to business decisions affecting us and the Operating Partnership, such as interests in the timing and pricing of property sales or refinancings in order to obtain favorable tax treatment.
14 |
Federal Income Tax Risks
Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.
To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes we must continually satisfy numerous income, asset and other tests, thus having to forego investments we might otherwise make and hindering our investment performance.
Failure to qualify as a REIT could adversely affect our operations and our ability to make distributions.
We will be subject to increased taxation if we fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Although we believe that we are organized and operate in such a manner so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code, no assurance can be given that we will remain so qualified. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations. The complexity of these provisions and applicable treasury regulations is also increased in the context of a REIT that holds its assets in partnership form. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to qualify as a REIT. Additionally, our charter provides our board of directors with the power, under certain circumstances, to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election and cause us to be taxed as a regular corporation, without the approval of our stockholders. A REIT generally is not taxed at the corporate level on income it distributes to its shareholders, as long as it distributes annually at least 90% of its taxable income to its shareholders. We have not requested and do not plan to request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service that we qualify as a REIT.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will face tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available for payment of cash dividends:
· | We would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to shareholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. |
· | We could be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax and possibly increased state and local taxes. |
· | Unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we could not elect to be treated as a REIT for four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify. |
In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will no longer be required to pay dividends (other than any mandatory dividends on any preferred shares we may offer). As a result of these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT could adversely affect the market price for our common stock.
U.S. federal tax reform legislation could affect REITs generally, the geographic markets in which we operate, our stock and our results of operations, both positively and negatively in ways that are difficult to anticipate.
Changes to the federal income tax laws are proposed regularly. Additionally, the REIT rules are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Department of the Treasury, which may result in revisions to regulations and interpretations in addition to statutory changes. If enacted, certain such changes could have an adverse impact on our business and financial results. In particular, H.R. 1, which generally takes effect for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018 (subject to certain exceptions), makes many significant changes to the federal income tax laws that will profoundly impact the taxation of individuals, corporations (both regular C corporations as well as corporations that have elected to be taxed as REITs), and the taxation of taxpayers with overseas assets and operations. A number of changes that affect non-corporate taxpayers will expire at the end of 2025 unless Congress acts to extend them. These changes will impact us and our shareholders in various ways, some of which are adverse or potentially adverse compared to prior law. To date, the IRS has issued only limited guidance with respect to certain of the new provisions, and there are numerous interpretive issues that will require guidance. It is highly likely that technical corrections legislation will be needed to clarify certain aspects of the new law and give proper effect to Congressional intent. There can be no assurance, however, that technical clarifications or changes needed to prevent unintended or unforeseen tax consequences will be enacted by Congress in the near future. In addition, while certain elements of tax reform legislation would not impact us directly as a REIT, they could impact the geographic markets in which we operate, the tenants that populate our shopping centers and the customers who frequent our properties in ways, both positive and negative, that are difficult to anticipate. Other legislative proposals could be enacted in the future that could affect REITs and their shareholders. Prospective investors are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the effect of H.R. 1 and any other potential tax law changes on an investment in our common stock.
15 |
Changes in tax laws may prevent us from maintaining our qualification as a REIT.
As we have previously described, we intend to maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. However, this intended qualification is based on the tax laws that are currently in effect. We are unable to predict any future changes in the tax laws that would adversely affect our status as a REIT. If there is a change in the tax law that prevents us from qualifying as a REIT or that requires REITs generally to pay corporate level income taxes, we may not be able to make the same level of distributions to our shareholders.
Complying with REIT requirements may force us to liquidate or restructure otherwise attractive investments. In order to qualify as a REIT, at least 75% of the value of our assets must consist of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified real estate assets. The remainder of our investments in securities (other than government securities, securities of TRSs and qualified real estate assets) cannot include more than 10% of the voting securities or 10% of the value of all securities, of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the total value of our assets (other than government securities, securities of TRSs and qualified real estate assets) can consist of securities of any one issuer, and no more than 20% of the total value of our assets can be represented by one or more TRSs. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.
We may have to borrow funds or sell assets to meet our distribution requirements.
Subject to some adjustments that are unique to REITs, a REIT generally must distribute 90% of its taxable income. For the purpose of determining taxable income, we may be required to accrue interest, rent and other items treated as earned for tax purposes but that we have not yet received. In addition, we may be required not to accrue as expenses for tax purposes some that which actually have been paid, including, for example, payments of principal on our debt, or some of our deductions might be disallowed by the Internal Revenue Service. As a result, we could have taxable income in excess of cash available for distribution. If this occurs, we may have to borrow funds or liquidate some of our assets in order to meet the distribution requirement applicable to a REIT.
Our ownership of and relationship with our TRSs will be limited, and a failure to comply with the limits would jeopardize our REIT status and may result in the application of a 100% excise tax.
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. A TRS may earn income that would not be qualifying income if earned directly by the parent REIT. Overall, no more than 20% of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs. A TRS will typically pay federal, state and local income tax at regular corporate rates on any income that it earns. In addition, the TRS rules impose a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis. Our TRSs will pay federal, state and local income tax on their taxable income, and their after-tax net income will be available for distribution to us but will not be required to be distributed to us. There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the 20% limitation discussed above or to avoid application of the 100% excise tax discussed above.
Liquidation of our assets may jeopardize our REIT qualification.
To qualify as a REIT, we must comply with requirements regarding our assets and our sources of income. If we are compelled to liquidate our investments to repay obligations to our lenders, we may be unable to comply with these requirements, ultimately jeopardizing our qualification as a REIT, or we may be subject to a 100% tax on any gain if we sell assets in transactions that are considered to be “prohibited transactions,” which are explained in the risk factor below.
We may be subject to other tax liabilities even if we qualify as a REIT.
Even if we remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we will be required to pay certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property. For example, we will be subject to income tax to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income (including capital gains). Additionally, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which dividends paid by us in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. Moreover, if we have net income from “prohibited transactions,” that income will be subject to a 100% tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. The determination as to whether a particular sale is a prohibited transaction depends on the facts and circumstances related to that sale. While we will undertake sales of assets if those assets become inconsistent with our long-term strategic or return objectives, we do not believe that those sales should be considered prohibited transactions, but there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service would not contend otherwise. The need to avoid prohibited transactions could cause us to forego or defer sales of properties that might otherwise be in our best interest to sell.
16 |
In addition, any net taxable income earned directly by our TRSs, or through entities that are disregarded for federal income tax purposes as entities separate from our TRSs, will be subject to federal and possibly state corporate income tax. To the extent that we and our affiliates are required to pay federal, state and local taxes, we will have less cash available for distributions to our shareholders.
Dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates on dividend income from regular corporations.
The maximum federal income tax rate applicable to “qualified dividend income” payable by non-REIT corporations to certain non-corporate U.S. stockholders is generally 20% and a 3.8% Medicare tax may also apply. Dividends paid by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rates applicable to qualified dividend income. Commencing with taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018 and continuing through 2025, H.R. 1 temporarily reduces the effective tax rate on ordinary REIT dividends (i.e., dividends other than capital gain dividends and dividends attributable to certain qualified dividend income received by us) for U.S. holders of our common stock that are individuals, estates or trusts by permitting such holders to claim a deduction in determining their taxable income equal to 20% of any such dividends they receive. Taking into account H.R. 1’s reduction in the maximum individual federal income tax rate from 39.6% to 37%, this results in a maximum effective rate of regular income tax on ordinary REIT dividends of 29.6% through 2025 (as compared to the 20% maximum federal income tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income received from a non-REIT corporation). The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate distributions could cause investors who are individuals to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay distributions. This could materially and adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our common stock.
Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively and may cause us to incur tax liabilities.
The REIT provisions of the Code substantially limit our ability to hedge our liabilities. Any income from a hedging transaction we enter into to manage risk of interest rate changes, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets does not constitute qualifying income for purposes of income tests that apply to us as a REIT. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions is likely to be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of the income tests. As a result of these rules, we may need to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because our TRS would be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses in our TRSs will generally not provide any tax benefit, except for being carried forward against future taxable income in the TRSs.
Item 1B: | Unresolved Staff Comments |
There are no unresolved staff comments.
Item 2: | Properties |
As of December 31, 2017, our portfolio consisted of 436 properties located in 43 states and totaling approximately 8.7 million square feet of gross leasable area. Our portfolio included 433 net lease properties, which contributed approximately 98.5% of annualized base rent, and three community shopping centers, which generated the remaining 1.5% of annualized base rent.
As of December 31, 2017, our portfolio was approximately 99.7% leased and had a weighted average remaining lease term of approximately 10.2 years. A significant majority of our properties are leased to national tenants and approximately 43.9% of our annualized base rent was derived from tenants, or parents thereof, with an investment grade credit rating. Substantially all of our tenants are subject to net lease agreements. A net lease typically requires the tenant to be responsible for minimum monthly rent and property operating expenses including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. In addition, our tenants are typically subject to future rent increases based on fixed amounts or increases in the consumer price index and many leases provide for additional rent calculated as a percentage of the tenants’ gross sales above a specified level.
17 |
Property Type Summary
The following table presents certain information about our properties as of December 31, 2017:
Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Annualized | % of Ann. |
% Investment
Grade |
Wtd. Avg.
Lease |
||||||||||||||
Property Type | Properties | Base Rent (1) | Base Rent | Rated (2) | Term | |||||||||||||
Retail Net Lease | 392 | $ | 108,066 | 90.6 | % | 40.6 | % | 10.2 yrs | ||||||||||
Retail Net Lease (ground leases) | 41 | 9,403 | 7.9 | % | 84.8 | % | 11.9 yrs | |||||||||||
Total Retail Net Lease | 433 | $ | 117,469 | 98.5 | % | 44.2 | % | 10.3 yrs | ||||||||||
Community Shopping Centers | 3 | 1,740 | 1.5 | % | 28.3 | % | 4.9 yrs | |||||||||||
Total Portfolio | 436 | $ | 119,209 | 100.0 | % | 43.9 | % | 10.2 yrs |
Annualized base rent is in thousands.
(1) | Represents annualized straight-line rent as of December 31, 2017. |
(2) | Reflects tenants, or parent entities thereof, with investment grade credit ratings from Standard & Poors, Moody's, Fitch and/or NAIC. |
Tenant Diversification
The following table presents annualized base rents for all tenants that generated 1.5% or greater of our total annualized base rent as of December 31, 2017:
($ in thousands) | ||||||||
Annualized | % of Ann. | |||||||
Tenant / Concept | Base Rent (1) | Base Rent | ||||||
Walgreens | $ | 9,215 | 7.7 | % | ||||
Walmart | 4,224 | 3.5 | % | |||||
LA Fitness | 4,224 | 3.5 | % | |||||
Lowe's | 4,215 | 3.5 | % | |||||
TJX Companies | 3,652 | 3.1 | % | |||||
CVS | 3,004 | 2.5 | % | |||||
Wawa | 2,664 | 2.2 | % | |||||
Mister Car Wash | 2,580 | 2.2 | % | |||||
Smart & Final | 2,475 | 2.1 | % | |||||
Dollar General | 2,415 | 2.0 | % | |||||
PetSmart | 2,234 | 1.9 | % | |||||
Tractor Supply | 2,179 | 1.8 | % | |||||
Hobby Lobby | 2,176 | 1.8 | % | |||||
Michaels | 2,072 | 1.7 | % | |||||
Dave & Buster's | 2,058 | 1.7 | % | |||||
Academy Sports | 1,982 | 1.7 | % | |||||
Dollar Tree | 1,939 | 1.6 | % | |||||
AutoZone | 1,909 | 1.6 | % | |||||
Rite Aid | 1,886 | 1.6 | % | |||||
Other(2) | 62,106 | 52.3 | % | |||||
Total | $ | 119,209 | 100.0 | % |
(1) Represents annualized straight-line rent as of December 31, 2017.
(2) Includes tenants generating less than 1.5% of annualized base rent.
Significant Tenants
Walgreens Co. (“Walgreens”) operates the second largest drugstore chain in the United States and trades, through its holding company Walgreens Boot Alliance, Inc. (“WBA”), on the Nasdaq stock exchange under the symbol “WBA.” For its fiscal year ended August 31, 2017, WBA reported total assets of approximately $66.0 billion, annual net sales of $118.2 billion, annual net income of $4.1 billion and shareholders’ equity of $28.3 billion. As of August 31, 2017, WBA operated 8,100 locations in 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
18 |
On June 28, 2017, WBA entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Rite Aid Corporation (“Rite Aid”), pursuant to which WBA agreed, subject to the terms and conditions thereof, to acquire 2,186 stores, three distribution centers and related inventory from Rite Aid. On September 19, 2017, WBA announced it had secured regulatory clearance for an amended and restated asset purchase agreement (the “Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement”) to purchase 1,932 stores, three distribution centers and related inventory from Rite Aid for $4.4 billion in cash and other consideration. Ownership of stores is expected to be transferred in phases, with the goal being to complete the store transfers in spring 2018. These transfers remain subject to closing conditions as set forth in the Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement.
The information set forth above was derived from the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by Walgreens with respect to their 2017 fiscal year. Additional information regarding Walgreens and WBA can be found in WBA’s public filings. These filings can be accessed at www.sec.gov . We are unable to confirm, and make no representations with respect to the accuracy of these reports and therefore you should not place undue reliance on such information as it pertains to our operations.
Tenant Sector Diversification
The following table presents annualized base rents for all sectors that generated 2.5% or greater of our total annualized base rents as of December 31, 2017:
($ in thousands) | ||||||||
Annualized | % of Ann. | |||||||
Tenant Sector | Base Rent (1) | Base Rent | ||||||
Pharmacy | $ | 14,694 | 12.3 | % | ||||
Grocery Stores | 9,136 | 7.7 | % | |||||
Health & Fitness | 6,938 | 5.8 | % | |||||
Tire & Auto Service | 6,534 | 5.5 | % | |||||
Off-Price Retail | 6,405 | 5.4 | % | |||||
Restaurants - Quick Service | 6,120 | 5.1 | % | |||||
Home Improvement | 5,551 | 4.7 | % | |||||
Convenience Stores | 5,298 | 4.4 | % | |||||
General Merchandise | 4,643 | 3.9 | % | |||||
Crafts and Novelties | 4,539 | 3.8 | % | |||||
Auto Parts | 4,370 | 3.7 | % | |||||
Specialty Retail | 4,261 | 3.6 | % | |||||
Warehouse Clubs | 3,749 | 3.1 | % | |||||
Farm and Rural Supply | 3,361 | 2.8 | % | |||||
Sporting Goods | 3,171 | 2.7 | % | |||||
Dollar Stores | 3,145 | 2.6 | % | |||||
Home Furnishings | 3,120 | 2.6 | % | |||||
Health Services | 3,066 | 2.6 | % | |||||
Other(2) | 21,108 | 17.7 | % | |||||
Total | $ | 119,209 | 100.0 | % |
(1) Represents annualized straight-line rent as of December 31, 2017.
(2) Includes sectors generating less than 2.5% of annualized base rent.
19 |
Geographic Diversification
The following table presents annualized base rents, by state, for our portfolio as of December 31, 2017:
($ in thousands) | ||||||||
Annualized | % of Ann. | |||||||
Tenant Sector | Base Rent (1) | Base Rent | ||||||
Michigan | $ | 14,394 | 12.1 | % | ||||
Texas | 10,112 | 8.5 | % | |||||
Florida | 8,839 | 7.4 | % | |||||
Illinois | 8,190 | 6.9 | % | |||||
Ohio | 6,816 | 5.7 | % | |||||
Pennsylvania | 4,646 | 3.9 | % | |||||
New Jersey | 4,352 | 3.7 | % | |||||
Louisiana | 3,853 | 3.2 | % | |||||
California | 3,697 | 3.1 | % | |||||
Kentucky | 3,640 | 3.1 | % | |||||
Missouri | 3,387 | 2.8 | % | |||||
Mississippi | 3,283 | 2.8 | % | |||||
Wisconsin | 3,258 | 2.7 | % | |||||
Georgia | 3,204 | 2.7 | % | |||||
Kansas | 2,979 | 2.5 | % | |||||
North Carolina | 2,591 | 2.2 | % | |||||
Colorado | 2,571 | 2.2 | % | |||||
Indiana | 2,366 | 2.0 | % | |||||
Tennessee | 2,149 | 1.8 | % | |||||
Alabama | 2,087 | 1.7 | % | |||||
South Carolina | 2,031 | 1.7 | % | |||||
Virginia | 1,990 | 1.7 | % | |||||
Minnesota | 1,794 | 1.5 | % | |||||
Utah | 1,709 | 1.4 | % | |||||
Oregon | 1,569 | 1.3 | % | |||||
New York | 1,551 | 1.3 | % | |||||
North Dakota | 1,455 | 1.2 | % | |||||
Oklahoma | 1,320 | 1.1 | % | |||||
Arizona | 1,276 | 1.1 | % | |||||
New Mexico | 1,098 | 0.9 | % | |||||
Iowa | 1,045 | 0.9 | % | |||||
Delaware | 1,010 | 0.8 | % | |||||
Arkansas | 991 | 0.8 | % | |||||
Maine | 792 | 0.7 | % | |||||
Connecticut | 585 | 0.5 | % | |||||
West Virginia | 529 | 0.4 | % | |||||
Nevada | 487 | 0.4 | % | |||||
Washington | 413 | 0.3 | % | |||||
Maryland | 388 | 0.3 | % | |||||
South Dakota | 326 | 0.3 | % | |||||
Montana | 249 | 0.2 | % | |||||
New Hampshire | 107 | 0.1 | % | |||||
Nebraska | 80 | 0.1 | % | |||||
Total | $ | 119,209 | 100 | % |
(1) Represents annualized straight-line rent as of December 31, 2017.
20 |
Lease Expirations
The following table presents contractual lease expirations within the Company’s portfolio as of December 31, 2017, assuming that no tenants exercise renewal options:
($ and GLA in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annualized Base Rent (1) | Gross Leasable Area | |||||||||||||||||||
Number of | % of | % of | ||||||||||||||||||
Year | Leases | Dollars | Total | Square Feet | Total | |||||||||||||||
2018 | 9 | $ | 1,130 | 0.9 | % | 255 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||
2019 | 12 | 2,681 | 2.2 | % | 138 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||
2020 | 18 | 3,206 | 2.7 | % | 237 | 2.7 | % | |||||||||||||
2021 | 29 | 5,905 | 5.0 | % | 375 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||
2022 | 24 | 4,284 | 3.6 | % | 394 | 4.6 | % | |||||||||||||
2023 | 39 | 6,804 | 5.7 | % | 659 | 7.6 | % | |||||||||||||
2024 | 38 | 11,037 | 9.3 | % | 1,069 | 12.3 | % | |||||||||||||
2025 | 38 | 8,915 | 7.5 | % | 626 | 7.2 | % | |||||||||||||
2026 | 47 | 7,155 | 6.0 | % | 682 | 7.9 | % | |||||||||||||
2027 | 38 | 9,716 | 8.2 | % | 814 | 9.4 | % | |||||||||||||
Thereafter | 206 | 58,376 | 48.9 | % | 3,414 | 39.5 | % | |||||||||||||
Total | 498 | $ | 119,209 | 100.0 | % | 8,663 | 100.0 | % |
(1) Represents annualized straight-line rent as of December 31, 2017.
Community Shopping Centers
Our three community shopping centers range in size from 20,000 to 241,458 square feet of GLA.
The location and primary occupancy information with respect to the community shopping centers as of December 31, 2017 are set forth below:
($ and GLA in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Year | Gross | Annualized | Percent | Anchor Tenants | ||||||||||||||||||
Completed / | Leasable | Annualized | Base Rent | Leased at | (Lease Expiration / | |||||||||||||||||
Property | Location | Renovated | Area (Sq. Ft.) | Base Rent (1) | per Sq. Ft (2) | December 31, 2017 | Option Expiration) (3) | |||||||||||||||
Capital Plaza | Frankfort, KY | 1978 / 2006 | 116 | $ | 634 | $ | 5.46 | 100 | % | Kmart (2018 / 2053) | ||||||||||||
Walgreens (2032 / 2052) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Central Michigan Commons | Mt. Pleasant, MI | 1973 / 1997 | 241 | $ | 1,015 | $ | 4.63 | 91 | % | Kmart (2018 / 2048) | ||||||||||||
JC Penney (2020 / 2035) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Staples (2020 / 2030) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
West Frankfort Plaza | West Frankfort, IL | 1982 / N/A | 20 | $ | 91 | $ | 6.53 | 70 | % | |||||||||||||
Totals | 377 | $ | 1,740 | $ | 4.62 | 93 | % |
(1) Represents annualized straight-line rent as of December 31, 2017.
(2) Calculated as total annualized base rent divided by leased GLA.
(3) Only the tenant has the option to extend a lease beyond the initial term.
Item 3: | Legal Proceedings |
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. We are not presently involved in any litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any other litigation threatened against us, other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, which is expected to be covered by our liability insurance and all of which collectively is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, results of operations or business or financial condition.
Item 4: | Mine Safety Disclosures |
Not applicable.
21 |
Item 5: | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Our common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “ADC.” The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices of our common stock, as reported on the NYSE, and the dividends declared per share of common stock by us for each calendar quarter in the last two fiscal years. Dividends were paid in the periods immediately subsequent to the periods in which such dividends were declared.
Dividends per | ||||||||||||
Quarter Ended | High | Low | share declared | |||||||||
March 31, 2017 | $ | 50.74 | $ | 45.23 | $ | 0.495 | ||||||
June 30, 2017 | $ | 51.10 | $ | 44.83 | $ | 0.505 | ||||||
September 30, 2017 | $ | 51.02 | $ | 45.62 | $ | 0.505 | ||||||
December 31, 2017 | $ | 52.69 | $ | 47.12 | $ | 0.520 | ||||||
March 31, 2016 | $ | 39.01 | $ | 32.49 | $ | 0.465 | ||||||
June 30, 2016 | $ | 48.24 | $ | 38.26 | $ | 0.480 | ||||||
September 30, 2016 | $ | 50.80 | $ | 46.02 | $ | 0.480 | ||||||
December 31, 2016 | $ | 49.25 | $ | 42.44 | $ | 0.495 |
As of February 20, 2018, the reported closing sale price per share of our common stock on the NYSE was $45.83.
At February 20, 2018, there were 30,992,597 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding which were held by approximately 132 shareholders of record. The number of shareholders of record does not reflect persons or entities that held their shares in nominee or “street” name. In addition, at February 20, 2018 there were 347,619 outstanding OP Units held by a limited partner other than our Company. The OP Units are exchangeable into shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis.
For 2017, we declared $2.025 per share of common stock in dividends. Of the $2.025, 85.1% represented ordinary income, and 14.9% represented return of capital, for tax purposes. For 2016, we declared $1.92 per share of common stock in dividends. Of the $1.92, 81.0% represented ordinary income, and 19.0% represented return of capital, for tax purposes.
We intend to continue to declare quarterly dividends. However, our distributions are determined by our board of directors and will depend upon cash generated by operating activities, our financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code and such other factors as the board of directors deems relevant. We have historically paid cash dividends, although we may choose to pay a portion in stock dividends in the future. To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income prior to net capital gains to our shareholders, as well as meet certain other requirements. We must pay these distributions in the taxable year the income is recognized; or in the following taxable year if they are declared during the last three months of the taxable year, payable to shareholders of record on a specified date during such period and paid during January of the following year. Such distributions are treated for REIT tax purposes as paid by us and received by our shareholders on December 31 of the year in which they are declared. In addition, at our election, a distribution for a taxable year may be declared in the following taxable year if it is declared before we timely file our tax return for such year and if paid on or before the first regular dividend payment after such declaration. These distributions qualify as dividends paid for the 90% REIT distribution test for the previous year and are taxable to holders of our capital stock in the year in which paid.
For information about our equity compensation plan, please see “Item 12 – Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
22 |
Item 6 : | Selected Financial Data |
The following table sets forth our selected financial information on a historical basis and should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation of discontinued operations. The balance sheet for the periods ending December 31, 2013 through 2017 and operating data for each of the periods presented were derived from our audited financial statements.
(in thousands, except per share information and number of properties) | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating Data | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 116,902 | $ | 91,527 | $ | 69,966 | $ | 53,559 | $ | 43,518 | ||||||||||
Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||
Property costs (1) | 12,467 | 8,596 | 6,379 | 4,916 | 3,656 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 9,949 | 8,015 | 6,988 | 6,629 | 5,952 | |||||||||||||||
Interest | 18,137 | 15,343 | 12,305 | 8,587 | 6,475 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 31,752 | 23,407 | 16,486 | 11,103 | 8,489 | |||||||||||||||
Impairments | - | - | - | 3,020 | - | |||||||||||||||
Total Expenses | 72,305 | 55,361 | 42,158 | 34,255 | 24,572 | |||||||||||||||
Income From Operations | 44,597 | 36,166 | 27,808 | 19,304 | 18,946 | |||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt | - | (333 | ) | (181 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of assets | 14,193 | 9,964 | 12,135 | (528 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||
Income From Continuing Operations | 58,790 | 45,797 | 39,762 | 18,776 | 18,946 | |||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of asset from discontinued operations | - | - | - | 123 | 946 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | - | - | - | 14 | 298 | |||||||||||||||
Net income | 58,790 | 45,797 | 39,762 | 18,913 | 20,190 | |||||||||||||||
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest | 678 | 679 | 744 | 425 | 515 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Agree Realty Corporation | $ | 58,112 | $ | 45,118 | $ | 39,018 | $ | 18,488 | $ | 19,675 | ||||||||||
Share Data | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares - diluted | 27,700 | 22,960 | 18,065 | 14,967 | 13,158 | |||||||||||||||
Net income per share - diluted | $ | 2.08 | $ | 1.95 | $ | 2.15 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 1.47 | ||||||||||
Cash dividends per share | $ | 2.03 | $ | 1.92 | $ | 1.85 | $ | 1.74 | $ | 1.64 | ||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data | ||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate (before accumulated depreciation) | $ | 1,299,255 | $ | 1,019,957 | $ | 755,849 | $ | 589,147 | $ | 471,366 | ||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 1,497,041 | $ | 1,141,972 | $ | 807,042 | $ | 606,415 | $ | 471,327 | ||||||||||
Total Debt, including accrued interest | $ | 525,811 | $ | 406,261 | $ | 320,547 | $ | 222,483 | $ | 158,869 | ||||||||||
Other Data | ||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Properties | 436 | 366 | 278 | 209 | 130 | |||||||||||||||
Gross Leasable Area (Sq. Ft.) | 8,663 | 7,033 | 5,207 | 4,315 | 3,662 | |||||||||||||||
Percentage Leased | 100 | % | 100 | % | 99 | % | 99 | % | 98 | % |
(1) Property costs include real estate taxes, insurance, maintenance and land lease expense.
23 |
Item 7: | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, and related notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the “-Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in “Item 1A – Risk Factors” above.
Overview
We are a fully integrated REIT primarily focused on the ownership, acquisition, development and management of retail properties net leased to industry leading tenants. We were founded in 1971 by our current Executive Chairman, Richard Agree, and our common stock was listed on the NYSE in 1994. Our assets are held by, and all of our operations are conducted through, directly or indirectly, the Operating Partnership, of which we are the sole general partner and in which we held a 98.8% interest as of December 31, 2017.
As of December 31, 2017, our portfolio consisted of 436 properties located in 43 states and totaling approximately 8.7 million square feet of gross leasable area. As of December 31, 2017, our portfolio was approximately 99.7% leased and had a weighted average remaining lease term of approximately 10.2 years. Substantially all of our tenants are subject to net lease agreements. A net lease typically requires the tenant to be responsible for minimum monthly rent and property operating expenses including property taxes, insurance and maintenance.
We elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1994. We believe that we have been organized and have operated in a manner that has allowed us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and we intend to continue operating in such a manner.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (”FASB”) issued ASU No. 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities” (“ASU 2017-12”). The objective of ASU 2017-12 is to expand hedge accounting for both financial (interest rate) and commodity risks, and create more transparency around how economic results are presented, both on the face of the financial statements and in the footnotes. ASU 2017-12 will be effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods in the year of adoption. Early adoption is permitted for any interim or annual period. The Company is in the process of determining the impact that the implementation of ASU 2017-12 will have on the Company’s financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting” (“ASU 2017-09”). The objective of ASU 2017-09 is to provide guidance on determining which changes to the terms and conditions of share-based payment awards require an entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 718. ASU 2017-09 will be effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods in the year of adoption. Early adoption is permitted for any interim or annual period. The Company has evaluated the impact that ASU 2017-09 will have on the Company’s financial statements, and concluded the implementation of ASU 2017-09 has no material impact on the financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU 2017-01”). The objective of ASU 2017-01 is to clarify the definition of a business by adding guidance on how entities should evaluate whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. ASU 2017-01 will be effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods in the year of adoption. Early adoption is permitted for any interim or annual period. The Company has early adopted and the guidance has no material impact on the company’s financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 “Leases” (“ASU 2016-02”). The new standard creates Topic 842, Leases, in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (FASB ASC) and supersedes FASB ASC 840, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases (operating and finance). However, for leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. The main difference between the existing guidance on accounting for leases and the new standard is that operating leases will now be recorded in the statement of financial position as assets and liabilities. The new standard requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases and operating leases. ASU 2016-02 is expected to impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements as the Company has certain operating land lease arrangements for which it is the lessee. GAAP requires only capital (finance) leases to be recognized in the statement of financial position, and amounts related to operating leases largely are reflected in the financial statements as rent expense on the income statement and in disclosures to the financial statements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has engaged a professional services firm to assist in the implementation of ASU 2016-02. The Company anticipates that its retail leases where it is the lessor will continue to be accounted for as operating leases under the new standard. Therefore, the Company does not currently anticipate significant changes in the accounting for its lease revenues. The Company is also the lessee under various land lease arrangements and it will be required to recognize right of use assets and related lease liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets upon adoption. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact of adopting the new leases standard on its consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and consolidated balance sheets.
24 |
In May 2014, with subsequent updates issued in August 2015 and March, April and May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 was developed to enable financial statement users to better understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The update’s core principle is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Companies are to use a five-step contract review model to ensure revenue is recognized, measured and disclosed in accordance with this principle. Those steps include the following: (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when or as the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
The Company has identified four main revenue streams of which three of them originate from lease contracts and will be subject to Leases ASU 2016-02, Topic 842 effective for annual reporting periods (including interim periods) beginning after December 15, 2018. The revenue streams are:
Revenue Recognition (ASU 2014-09, Topic 610-20):
· | Gain (loss) on sale of real estate properties |
Leases (ASU 2016-02, Topic 842):
· | Rental revenues |
· | Straight line rents |
· | Tenant recoveries |
As of January 1, 2018, the Company will be accounting for the sale of real estate properties under Subtopic 610-20 which provides for revenue recognition based on transfer of ownership. All properties were non-financial real estate assets and thus not businesses which were sold to non-customers with no performance obligations. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company sold real estate properties for net proceeds of $44.3 million, and a recorded net gain of $14.2 million.
Management has concluded that all of the Company’s material revenue streams falls outside of the scope of this guidance and currently recognizes revenue from its contracts with customers at a point in time and does not anticipate any changes. The Company intends to implement the standard under the modified retrospective method and does not anticipate recording any cumulative effect recognized in retained earnings as of the date of adoption (January 1, 2018).
Critical Accounting Policies
Our accounting policies are determined in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that are subjective in nature and, as a result, our actual results could differ materially from our estimates. Set forth below are the more critical accounting policies that require management judgment and estimates in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. This summary should be read in conjunction with the more complete discussion of our accounting policies and procedures included in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.
25 |
Revenue Recognition
We lease real estate to our tenants under long-term net leases which we account for as operating leases. Under this method, leases that have fixed and determinable rent increases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Rental increases based upon changes in the consumer price indexes, or other variable factors, are recognized only after changes in such factors have occurred and are then applied according to the lease agreements. Certain leases also provide for additional rent based on tenants’ sales volumes. These rents are recognized when determinable by us after the tenant exceeds a sales breakpoint. Contractually obligated reimbursements from tenants for recoverable real estate taxes and operating expenses are generally included in operating costs reimbursement in the period when such expenses are recorded.
Real Estate Investments
We record the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. For properties developed by us, all direct and indirect costs related to planning, development and construction, including interest, real estate taxes and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the construction period, are capitalized for financial reporting purposes and recorded as property under development until construction has been completed.
Accounting for Acquisitions of Real Estate
The acquisition of property for investment purposes is typically accounted for as an asset acquisition. We allocate the purchase price to land, building and identified intangible assets and liabilities, based in each case on their relative estimated fair values and without giving rise to goodwill. Intangible assets and liabilities represent the value of in-place leases and above- or below-market leases. In making estimates of fair values, we may use a number of sources, including data provided by independent third parties, as well as information obtained by the Company as a result our due diligence, including expected future cash flows of the property and various characteristics of the markets where the property is located.
Depreciation
Our real estate portfolio is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated remaining useful life of the properties, which are generally 40 years for buildings and 10 to 20 years for improvements. Properties classified as “held for sale” and properties under development are not depreciated.
Impairments
We review our real estate investments periodically for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Events or circumstances that may occur include, but are not limited to, significant changes in real estate market conditions or our ability to re-lease or sell properties that are vacant or become vacant. Management determines whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. An asset is considered impaired if its carrying value exceeds its estimated undiscounted cash flows and an impairment charge is recorded in the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value.
Results of Operations
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2017 to Year Ended December 31, 2016
Minimum rental income increased $21.1 million, or 25%, to $105.1 million in 2017, compared to $84.0 million in 2016. Approximately $22.4 million of the increase was due to the acquisition of 79 properties in 2017 and the full year impact of 82 properties acquired in 2016. Approximately $2.2 million of the increase was attributable to four development projects completed in 2017 and the full year impact of nine development projects completed in 2016. These increases were partially offset by approximately a $2.1 million reduction in minimum rental income from properties sold during 2017 that were owned for all or part of 2016.
Percentage rents remained consistent with prior periods. The years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 totaled $0.2 million.
Operating cost reimbursements increased $3.5 million, or 48%, to $10.8 million in 2017, compared to $7.3 million in 2016. Operating cost reimbursements increased primarily due to higher levels of recoverable property operating expenses, including real estate taxes, and increased property count. The portfolio recovery rate remained consistent at 91% in 2017 and 2016 due to the factors discussed above.
Other income increased $0.5 million in 2017 compared to $0.0 million in 2016.
26 |
Real estate taxes increased $2.7 million, or 50%, to $8.2 million in 2017, compared to $5.5 million in 2016. The increase was due to the ownership of additional properties in 2017 compared to 2016 for which we remit real estate taxes and are subsequently reimbursed by tenants.
Property operating expenses increased $1.1 million, or 45%, to $3.6 million in 2017, compared to $2.5 million in 2016. The increase was primarily due to the ownership of additional properties in 2017 compared to 2016 which contributed to higher property maintenance, utilities and insurance expenses. Our tenants subsequently reimbursed us for the majority of these expenses.
Land lease payments remained consistent with prior periods. The years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 totaled approximately $0.7 million.
General and administrative expenses increased $1.9 million, or 36%, to $9.9 million in 2017, compared to $8.0 million in 2016. The increase was primarily the result of increased employee headcount and associated professional costs and was partially offset by a one-time credit of $0.2 million to reflect a reduction in the company’s deferred tax liability due to new tax legislation. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue decreased to 8.5% for 2017 from 8.8% in 2016.
Depreciation and amortization increased $8.4 million, or 35%, to $31.8 million in 2017, compared to $23.4 million in 2016. The increase was due to the ownership of additional properties in 2017 compared to 2016.
We recorded no impairment charges during 2017 or 2016.
Interest expense increased $2.8 million, or 18%, to $18.1 million in 2017, from $15.3 million in 2016. The increase in interest expense was primarily a result of higher levels of borrowings to finance the acquisition and development of additional properties. The Company also issued $100.0 million senior unsecured notes in September 2017. Higher interest expense was also attributable to the full year interest impact of debt issuances in 2016.
During 2017, the Company sold real estate properties for net proceeds of $44.3 million and recorded a net gain of $14.2 million (net of any expected losses on real estate held for sale).
We had no income from discontinued operations in 2017 or 2016.
Net Income increased $13.0 million, or 29%, to $58.8 million in 2017, from $45.8 million in 2016 for the reasons set forth above.
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2016 to Year Ended December 31, 2015
Minimum rental income increased $19.7 million, or 31%, to $84.0 million in 2016, compared to $64.3 million in 2015. Approximately $20.2 million of the increase is due to the acquisition of 82 properties in 2016 and the full year impact of 73 properties acquired in 2015. Approximately $1.2 million of the increase was attributable to nine development projects completed in 2016 and the full year impact of one development project completed in 2015, and approximately a $0.4 million increase due to other minimum rental income adjustments. These increases were partially offset by approximately a $2.1 million reduction in minimum rental income from properties sold during 2016 that were owned for all of part of 2015.
Percentage rents remained consistent with prior periods. The years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 totaled $0.2 million.
Operating cost reimbursements increased $2.0 million, or 38%, to $7.3 million in 2016, compared to $5.3 million in 2015. Operating cost reimbursements increased due to higher levels of recoverable property operating expenses, including real estate taxes, acquisition, disposition, and development activity. The portfolio recovery rate remained consistent at 91% for both 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Other income remained consistent with prior periods.
27 |
Real estate taxes increased $1.5 million, or 36%, to $5.5 million in 2016, compared to $4.0 million in 2015. The increase was due to the ownership of additional properties in 2016 compared to 2015 for which we remit real estate taxes and are subsequently reimbursed by tenants.
Property operating expenses increased $0.7 million, or 40%, to $2.5 million in 2016, compared to $1.8 million in 2015. The increase was primarily due to the ownership of additional properties in 2016 compared to 2015 which contributed to higher property maintenance, utilities and insurance expenses. Our tenants subsequently reimbursed us for the majority of these expenses.
Land lease payments increased $0.1 million, or 8%, to $0.7 million in 2016, compared to $0.6 million in 2015.
General and administrative expenses increased $1.0 million, or 15%, to $8.0 million in 2016, compared to $7.0 million in 2015. The increase was primarily the result of increased employee headcount and associated professional costs. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue decreased to 8.8% for 2016 from 10.0% in 2015.
Depreciation and amortization increased $6.9 million, or 42%, to $23.4 million in 2016, compared to $16.5 million in 2015.
We recorded no impairment charges during 2016 or 2015.
Interest expense increased $3.0 million, or 25%, to $15.3 million in 2016, from $12.3 million in 2015. The increase in interest expense was primarily a result of an additional borrowing and debt issuance in 2016, including the $40.0 million unsecured term loan facility we entered into in July 2016 and $60.0 million senior unsecured notes issued in July 2016, which were offset by the repayment of the $8.6 million portfolio mortgage loan in March 2016.
During 2016, the Company sold real estate properties for net proceeds of $28.9 million and a recorded net gain of $10.0 million (net of any expected losses on real estate held for sale).
We had no income from discontinued operations in 2016 or 2015.
Net Income increased $6.0 million, or 15%, to $45.8 million in 2016, from $39.8 million in 2015 for the reasons set forth above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal demands for funds include payment of operating expenses, payment of principal and interest on our outstanding indebtedness, distributions to our shareholders and future property acquisitions and development.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through cash provided from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2017, available cash and cash equivalents was $50.8 million. As of December 31, 2017 we had $14.0 million outstanding on our revolving credit facility and $236.0 million was available for future borrowings, subject to our compliance with covenants. We anticipate funding our long-term capital needs through cash provided from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, the issuance of debt and common or preferred equity or other instruments convertible into or exchangeable for common or preferred equity.
In August 2017, the Company entered into an uncommitted and unsecured $100 million private placement shelf agreement (the “AIG Shelf Agreement”) with AIG Asset Management (U.S.), LLC (“AIG”) and each AIG Affiliate named therein. The AIG Shelf Agreement allows us to issue senior unsecured notes to AIG at terms to be agreed upon at the time of any issuance during a three year issuance period ending in August 2020. As of December 31, 2017, no notes had been issued under the AIG Shelf Agreement.
In August 2017, the Company entered into an uncommitted and unsecured $100 million private placement shelf agreement (the “TIAA Shelf Agreement”) with Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (“TIAA”) and each TIAA Affiliate named therein. The TIAA Shelf Agreement allows us to issue senior unsecured notes to TIAA at terms to be agreed upon at the time of any issuance during a three year issuance period ending in August 2020. As of December 31, 2017, no notes had been issued under the TIAA Shelf Agreement.
We continually evaluate alternative financing and believe that we can obtain financing on reasonable terms. However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to us.
Capitalization
As of December 31, 2017, our total market capitalization was approximately $2.1 billion. Market capitalization consisted of $1.6 billion of shares of an common stock (based on the December 29, 2017 closing price of our common stock on the NYSE of $51.44 per share and assuming the conversion of OP Units) and $522.4 million of total debt including (i) $14.0 million of borrowings under our revolving credit facility; (ii) $159.3 million of unsecured term loans; (iii) $260.0 million of senior unsecured notes; and (iv) $89.1 million of mortgage notes payable. Our ratio of total debt to total market capitalization was 24.5% at December 31, 2017.
28 |
At December 31, 2017, the non-controlling interest in our Operating Partnership consisted of a 1.2% ownership interest in the Operating Partnership held by third parties. The OP Units may, under certain circumstances, be exchanged for our shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis. We, as sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, have the option to settle exchanged OP Units held by others for cash based on the current trading price of our shares. Assuming the exchange of all OP Units, there would have been 31,352,519 shares of common stock outstanding at December 31, 2017.
Debt
The below table summarizes the Company’s outstanding debt for the periods ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Interest | Principal Amount Outstanding | |||||||||||||
Senior Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility | Rate | Maturity | December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||
Credit Facility (1) | 2.87 | % | January 2021 | $ | 14,000 | $ | 14,000 | |||||||
Total Credit Facility | $ | 14,000 | $ | 14,000 | ||||||||||
Unsecured Term Loans (2) | ||||||||||||||
2019 Term Loan | 3.62 | % | May 2019 | $ | 19,304 | $ | 20,044 | |||||||
2023 Term Loan | 3.05 | % | July 2023 | 40,000 | 40,000 | |||||||||
2024 Term Loan Facility | 3.74 | % | January 2024 | 65,000 | 65,000 | |||||||||
2024 Term Loan Facility | 3.85 | % | January 2024 | 35,000 | 35,000 | |||||||||
Total Unsecured Term Loans | $ | 159,304 | $ | 160,044 | ||||||||||
Senior Unsecured Notes (2) | ||||||||||||||
2025 Senior Unsecured Notes | 4.16 | % | May 2025 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 50,000 | |||||||
2027 Senior Unsecured Notes | 4.26 | % | May 2027 | 50,000 | 50,000 | |||||||||
2028 Senior Unsecured Notes | 4.42 | % | July 2028 | 60,000 | 60,000 | |||||||||
2029 Senior Unsecured Notes | 4.19 | % | September 2029 | 100,000 | - | |||||||||
Total Senior Unsecured Notes | $ | 260,000 | $ | 160,000 | ||||||||||
Mortgage Notes Payable (2) | ||||||||||||||
Secured Term Loan | 2.49 | % | April 2018 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | |||||||
Single Asset Mortgage Loan | 3.32 | % | October 2019 | 21,500 | - | |||||||||
Portfolio Mortgage Loan | 6.90 | % | January 2020 | 3,573 | 5,114 | |||||||||
Single Asset Mortgage Loan | 6.24 | % | February 2020 | 2,963 | 3,049 | |||||||||
CMBS Portfolio Loan | 3.60 | % | January 2023 | 23,640 | 23,640 | |||||||||
Single Asset Mortgage Loan | 5.01 | % | September 2023 | 5,131 | 5,294 | |||||||||
Portfolio Credit Tenant Lease ("CTL") | 6.27 | % | July 2026 | 7,288 | 7,910 | |||||||||
Total Mortgage Notes Payable | $ | 89,095 | $ | 70,007 | ||||||||||
Total Principal Amount Outstanding | $ | 522,399 | $ | 404,051 |
(1) The annual interest rate of the Credit Facility assumes one month LIBOR as of December 31, 2017 of 1.57%.
(2) Interest rate includes the effects of variable interest rates that have been swapped to fixed interest rates.
Senior Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility
In December 2016, the Company amended and restated the credit agreement that governs our senior unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loan facility to increase the aggregate borrowing capacity to $350.0 million. The agreement provides for a $250.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, a $65.0 million unsecured term loan facility and a $35.0 million unsecured term loan facility. The unsecured revolving credit facility matures in January 2021 with options to extend the maturity date to January 2022. The unsecured term loan facilities mature in January 2024. We have the ability to increase the aggregate borrowing capacity under the credit agreement up to $500.0 million, subject to lender approval. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 130 to 195 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio. Additionally, we are required to pay an unused commitment fee at an annual rate of 15 or 25 basis points on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility, depending on the amount of borrowings outstanding. The credit agreement contains certain financial covenants, including a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum percentage of secured debt to total asset value.
Unsecured Term Loan Facilities
In July 2016, the Company entered into a $40.0 million unsecured term loan facility that matures in July 2023 (the “2023 Term Loan”). Borrowings under the 2023 Term Loan are priced at LIBOR plus 165 to 225 basis points, depending on the Company’s leverage. The Company entered into an interest rate swap to fix LIBOR at 1.40% until maturity. As of December 31, 2017, $40.0 million was outstanding under the 2023 Term Loan, which was subject to an all-in interest rate of 3.05%.
In August 2016, the Company entered into a $20.3 million unsecured amortizing term loan that matures in May 2019 (the “2019 Term Loan”). Borrowings under the 2019 Term Loan are priced at LIBOR plus 170 basis points. In order to fix LIBOR on the 2019 Term Loan at 1.92% until maturity, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement in place, which was assigned by the lender under the previously secured facility to the 2019 Term Loan lender. As of December 31, 2017, $19.3 million was outstanding under the 2019 Term Loan bearing an all-in interest rate of 3.62%.
29 |
The amended and restated credit agreement, described above, extended the maturity dates of the $65.0 million unsecured term loan facility and $35.0 million unsecured term loan facility (together, the “2024 Term Loan Facilities”) to January 2024. In connection with entering into the amended and restated credit agreement, the prior notes evidencing the existing $65.0 million unsecured term loan facility and $35.0 million unsecured term loan facility were canceled and new notes evidencing the 2024 Term Loan Facilities were executed. Borrowings under the unsecured 2024 Term Loan Facilities bear interest at a variable LIBOR plus 165 to 235 basis points, depending on the Company's leverage ratio. The Company utilized existing interest rate swaps to effectively fix the LIBOR rate (refer to Note 8 – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity).
Senior Unsecured Notes
In May 2015, the Company completed a private placement of $100.0 million principal amount of senior unsecured notes. The senior unsecured notes were sold in two series; $50.0 million of 4.16% notes due in May 2025 and $50.0 million of 4.26% notes due in May 2027. The weighted average term of the senior unsecured notes is 11 years and the weighted average interest rate is 4.21%.
In July 2016, the Company entered into a note purchase agreement with institutional purchasers. Pursuant to the note purchase agreement, the Operating Partnership completed a private placement of $60.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.42% senior unsecured notes due July 28, 2028. The senior unsecured notes were sold only to institutional investors and did not involve a public offering in reliance on the exemption from registration in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
In August 2017, the Company entered into a note purchase agreement with institutional purchasers. Pursuant to the note purchase agreement, the Operating Partnership completed a private placement of $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.19% senior unsecured notes due September 2029. The senior unsecured notes are guaranteed by the Company. The closing of the private placement was consummated in September 2017, and, on that date, the Operating Partnership issued the senior unsecured notes. The senior unsecured notes were sold only to institutional investors and did not involve a public offering in reliance on the exemption from registration in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
Mortgage Notes Payable
As of December 31, 2017, we had total gross mortgage indebtedness of $89.1 million, with a weighted average term to maturity of 3.0 years. Including our mortgages that have been swapped to a fixed interest rate, our weighted average interest rate on mortgage debt was 3.74%.
In December 2017, the Company assumed an interest only mortgage note for $21.5 million with PNC Bank, National Association. The mortgage note is due October 2019, secured by a multi-tenant property and has a fixed interest rate of 3.32%.
We have entered into mortgage loans which are secured by multiple properties and contain cross-default and cross-collateralization provisions. Cross-collateralization provisions allow a lender to foreclose on multiple properties in the event that we default under the loan. Cross-default provisions allow a lender to foreclose on the related property in the event a default is declared under another loan.
30 |
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations by due date as of December 31, 2017:
Total | 2018 | 2019-2020 | 2021-2022 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Notes Payable | $ | 89,095 | $ | 27,576 | $ | 28,118 | $ | 2,058 | $ | 31,343 | ||||||||||
Revolving Credit Facility | 14,000 | - | - | 14,000 | - | |||||||||||||||
Unsecured Term Loans | 159,304 | 761 | 18,543 | - | 140,000 | |||||||||||||||
Senior Unsecured Notes | 260,000 | - | - | - | 260,000 | |||||||||||||||
Land Lease Obligations | 10,342 | 641 | 1,265 | 1,093 | 7,343 | |||||||||||||||
Estimated Interest Payments on Outstanding Debt | 155,978 | 20,270 | 37,510 | 35,449 | 62,749 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 688,719 | $ | 49,248 | $ | 85,436 | $ | 52,600 | $ | 501,435 |
Estimated interest payments are based on (i) the stated rates for mortgage notes payable, including the effect of interest rate swaps and (ii) the stated rates for unsecured term loans, including the effect of interest rate swaps and assuming the interest rate in effect for the most recent quarter remains in effect through the respective maturity dates.
Dividends
During the quarter ended December 31, 2017, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.520 per share. The cash dividend was paid on January 3, 2018 to holders of record on December 20, 2017.
Inflation
Our leases typically contain provisions to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on our results of operations. Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases or increases in the consumer price index. Certain of our leases contain clauses enabling us to receive percentage rents based on tenants’ gross sales, which generally increase as prices rise. During times when inflation is greater than increases in rent, rent increases will not keep up with the rate of inflation.
Substantially all of properties are leased to tenants under long-term, net leases which require the tenant to pay certain operating expenses for a property, thereby reducing our exposure to operating cost increases resulting from inflation. Inflation may have an adverse impact on our tenants.
Funds from Operations
Funds from Operations (“FFO”) is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”) to mean net income computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and any impairment charges on a depreciable real estate asset, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management uses FFO as a supplemental measure to conduct and evaluate the Company’s business because there are certain limitations associated with using GAAP net income by itself as the primary measure of the Company’s operating performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, management believes that the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting is insufficient by itself.
FFO should not be considered an alternative to net income as the primary indicator of the Company’s operating performance, or an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. Further, while the Company adheres to the NAREIT definition of FFO, its presentation of FFO is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures of other REITs due to the fact that all REITs may not use the same definition.
Adjusted Funds from Operations (“AFFO”) is a non-GAAP financial measure of operating performance used by many companies in the REIT industry. AFFO further adjusts FFO for certain non-cash items that reduce or increase net income in accordance with GAAP. Management considers AFFO a useful supplemental measure of the Company’s performance, however, AFFO should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of the Company’s performance, or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. The Company’s computation of AFFO may differ from the methodology for calculating AFFO used by other equity REITs, and therefore may not be comparable to such other REITs. Note that, during the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company adjusted its calculation of AFFO to exclude non-recurring capitalized building improvements and to include non-real estate related depreciation and amortization. Management believes that these changes provide a more useful measure of operating performance in the context of AFFO.
31 |
The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to FFO for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
Year Ended | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||
Reconciliation from Net Income to Funds from Operations | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 58,790 | $ | 45,797 | $ | 39,762 | ||||||
Depreciation of real estate assets | 19,507 | 15,200 | 11,466 | |||||||||
Amortization of leasing costs | 163 | 125 | 98 | |||||||||
Amortization of lease intangibles | 12,004 | 8,010 | 4,859 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of assets | (14,193 | ) | (9,964 | ) | (12,135 | ) | ||||||
Funds from Operations | $ | 76,271 | $ | 59,168 | $ | 44,050 | ||||||
Funds from Operations Per Share - Diluted | $ | 2.72 | $ | 2.54 | $ | 2.39 | ||||||
Weighted average shares and OP units outstanding | ||||||||||||
Basic | 27,972,721 | 23,216,355 | 18,350,741 | |||||||||
Diluted | 28,047,966 | 23,307,418 | 18,413,034 |
The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to AFFO for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
Year Ended | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||
Reconciliation from Net Income to Adjusted Funds from Operations | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 58,790 | $ | 45,797 | $ | 39,762 | ||||||
Cumulative adjustments to calculate FFO | 17,481 | 13,371 | 4,288 | |||||||||
Funds from Operations | $ | 76,271 | $ | 59,168 | $ | 44,050 | ||||||
Straight-line accrued rent | (3,548 | ) | (3,582 | ) | (2,450 | ) | ||||||
Deferred revenue recognition | - | (541 | ) | (463 | ) | |||||||
Deferred tax expense (benefit) | (230 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Stock based compensation expense | 2,589 | 2,441 | 1,992 | |||||||||
Amortization of financing costs | 574 | 516 | 494 | |||||||||
Non-real estate depreciation | 78 | 72 | 62 | |||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | - | 333 | 180 | |||||||||
Adjusted Funds from Operations | $ | 75,734 | $ | 58,407 | $ | 43,865 | ||||||
Adjusted Funds from Operations Per Share - Diluted | $ | 2.70 | $ | 2.51 | $ | 2.38 | ||||||
Additional supplemental disclosure | ||||||||||||
Scheduled principal repayments | $ | 3,151 | $ | 2,954 | $ | 2,772 | ||||||
Capitalized interest | $ | 570 | $ | 210 | $ | 39 | ||||||
Capitalized building improvements | $ | 1,230 | $ | 541 | $ | 310 |
Item 7A: | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily through our borrowing activities. There is inherent roll-over risk for borrowings as they mature and are renewed at current market rates. The extent of this risk is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future interest rates and our future financing requirements.
Our interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below presents the principal payments (in thousands) and the weighted average interest rates on outstanding debt, by year of expected maturity, to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate changes, assuming no mortgage defaults.
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Notes Payable | $ | 27,576 | $ | 24,251 | $ | 3,866 | $ | 998 | $ | 1,060 | $ | 31,344 | $ | 89,095 | ||||||||||||||
Average Interest Rate | 2.87 | % | 3.69 | % | 6.21 | % | 6.02 | % | 6.02 | % | 4.09 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility (1) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 14,000 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 14,000 | ||||||||||||||
Average Interest Rate | 2.63 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unsecured Term Loans | $ | 761 | $ | 18,543 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 140,000 | $ | 159,304 | ||||||||||||||
Average Interest Rate | 3.62 | % | 3.62 | % | 3.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Unsecured Notes | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 260,000 | $ | 260,000 | ||||||||||||||
Average Interest Rate | 4.25 | % |
(1) | The balloon payment balance includes the balance outstanding under the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2017. The Credit Facility matures in January 2021, with options to extend the maturity for one year at the Company’s election, subject to certain conditions. |
32 |
The fair value is estimated at $89.8 million and $426.7 million for mortgage notes payable and unsecured term loans and notes, respectively, as of December 31, 2017.
The table above incorporates those exposures that exist as of December 31, 2017; it does not consider those exposures or positions which could arise after that date. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period and interest rates.
We seek to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower the overall borrowing costs by closely monitoring our variable rate debt and converting such debt to fixed rates when we deem such conversion advantageous. From time to time, we may enter into interest rate swap agreements or other interest rate hedging contracts. While these agreements are intended to lessen the impact of rising interest rates, they also expose us to the risks that the other parties to the agreements will not perform, we could incur significant costs associated with the settlement of the agreements, the agreements will be unenforceable and the underlying transactions will fail to qualify as highly-effective cash flow hedges under GAAP guidance.
In April 2012, the Company entered into an amortizing forward-starting interest rate swap agreement to hedge against changes in future cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $22.3 million in variable-rate borrowings. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company receives from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on 1 month LIBOR and pays to the counterparty a fixed rate of 1.92%. The notional amount as of December 31, 2017 was $19.3 million. This swap effectively converted $22.3 million of variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings from July 1, 2013 to May 1, 2019. As of December 31, 2017, this interest rate swap was valued as a liability of approximately $0.0 million.
In December 2012, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge against changes in future cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $25.0 million in variable-rate borrowings. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company receives from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on 1 month LIBOR and pays to the counterparty a fixed rate of 0.89%. This swap effectively converted $25.0 million of variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings from December 6, 2012 to April 4, 2018. As of December 31, 2017, this interest rate swap was valued as an asset of approximately $0.0 million.
In September 2013, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge against changes in future cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $35.0 million in variable-rate borrowings. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company receives from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on 1 month LIBOR and pays to the counterparty a fixed rate of 2.20%. This swap effectively converted $35.0 million of variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings from October 3, 2013 to September 29, 2020. As of December 31, 2017, this interest rate swap was valued as a liability of approximately $0.2 million.
In July 2014, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge against changes in future cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $65.0 million in variable-rate borrowings. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company receives from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on 1 month LIBOR and pays to the counterparty a fixed rate of 2.09%. This swap effectively converted $65.0 million of variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings from July 21, 2014 to July 21, 2021. As of December 31, 2017, this interest rate swap was valued as a liability of approximately $0.1 million.
In September 2016, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge against changes in future cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $40.0 million in variable-rate borrowings. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company receives from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on 1 month LIBOR and pays to the counterparty a fixed rate of 1.40%. This swap effectively converted $40.0 million of variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings from August 1, 2016 to July 1, 2023. As of December 31, 2017, this interest rate swap was valued as an asset of approximately $1.5 million.
We do not use derivative instruments for trading or other speculative purposes and we did not have any other derivative instruments or hedging activities as of December 31, 2017.
As of December 31, 2017, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on the portion of our debt bearing interest at variable rates would have resulted in an increase in interest expense of approximately $0.1 million.
33 |
Item 8 : | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
The financial statements and supplementary data are listed in the Index to the Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules appearing on Page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K following page F-1.
Item 9: | Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
There are no disagreements with our independent registered public accounting firm on accounting matters or financial disclosure.
Item 9A: | Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a15-(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
1) | Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of our Company; |
2) | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and |
3) | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our assessment and those criteria, our management believes that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The attestation report required under this item is contained on page F-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9B: | Other Information |
None.
34 |
Item 10: | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
Incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement with respect to our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
I tem 11: | Executive Compensation |
Incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement with respect to our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Item 12: | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
The following table summarizes the equity compensation plan under which our common stock may be issued as of December 31, 2017.
Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrant and Rights |
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) |
||||||||||
Plan Category | (a) | (b) | (c) | |||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders | - | - | 480,299 | (1) | ||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders | - | - | - | |||||||||
Total | - | - | 480,299 |
(1) | Relates to various stock-based awards available for issuance under our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan, including incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock awards, restricted stock awards, unrestricted stock awards and dividend equivalent rights. |
Additional information, including our Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management table, is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement with respect to our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Item 13: | Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence |
Incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement with respect to our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
I tem 14: | Principal Accounting Fees and Services |
Incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement with respect to our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
35 |
Item 15: | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
15(a)(1). | The following documents are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: |
§ | Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms |
§ | Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 |
§ | Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 |
§ | Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 |
§ | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 |
§ | Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
15(a)(2). | The following is a list of the financial statement schedules required by Item 8: |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation |
15(a)(3). | Exhibits |
36 |
37 |
* | Filed herewith. |
+ | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, the registrant has not filed debt instruments relating to long-term debt that is not registered and for which the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed 10% of total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis as of December 31, 2017. The registrant agrees to furnish a copy of such agreements to the SEC upon request.
15(b) | The Exhibits listed in Item 15(a)(3) are hereby filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K. | |
15(c) | The financial statement schedule listed at Item 15(a)(2) is hereby filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
38 |
F- 1 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
Grant Thornton LLP 27777 Franklin Road, Suite 800 Southfield, MI 48034-2366
T 248.262.1950 F 248.350.3581 www.GrantThornton.com |
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Agree Realty Corporation
Opinion on internal control over financial reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Agree Realty Corporation (a Maryland corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, and our report dated February 22, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
Grant Thornton LLP
U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd
F- 2 |
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and limitations of internal control over financial reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP | |
Southfield, Michigan | |
February 22, 2018 |
Grant Thornton LLP
U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd
F- 3 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
Grant Thornton LLP 27777 Franklin Road, Suite 800 Southfield, MI 48034
T X248-262-1950 F 248-350-3581 www.GrantThornton.com |
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Agree Realty Corporation
Opinion on the financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Agree Realty Corporation (a Maryland corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and schedules (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), and our report dated February 22, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion.
Basis for opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
Grant Thornton LLP
U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd
F- 4 |
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP | |
Southfield, Michigan | |
February 22, 2018 |
Grant Thornton LLP
U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd
F- 5 |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per-share data)
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Real Estate Investments | ||||||||
Land | $ | 405,457 | $ | 309,687 | ||||
Buildings | 868,396 | 703,506 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (85,239 | ) | (69,696 | ) | ||||
1,188,614 | 943,497 | |||||||
Property under development | 25,402 | 6,764 | ||||||
Net Real Estate Investments | 1,214,016 | 950,261 | ||||||
Real Estate Held For Sale, net | 2,420 | - | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 50,807 | 33,395 | ||||||
Cash Held in Escrows | 7,975 | - | ||||||
Accounts Receivable - Tenants, net of allowance of | ||||||||
$296 and $50 for possible losses at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively | 15,477 | 11,535 | ||||||
Unamortized Deferred Expenses | ||||||||
Credit facility finance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $433 and $1,262 at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively | 1,174 | 1,552 | ||||||
Leasing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $814 and $677 at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively | 1,583 | 1,227 | ||||||
Lease intangible s , net of accumulated amortization of $41,390 and $25,666 at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively | 195,158 | 139,871 | ||||||
Interest Rate Swaps | 1,592 | 1,409 | ||||||
Other Assets, net | 4,432 | 2,722 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 1,494,634 | $ | 1,141,972 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F- 6 |
AGREE REALTY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per-share data)
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
LIABILITIES | ||||||||
Mortgage Notes Payable, net | $ | 88,270 | $ | 69,067 | ||||
Unsecured Term Loans, net | 158,171 | 158,679 | ||||||
Senior Unsecured Notes, net | 259,122 | 159,176 | ||||||
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility | 14,000 | 14,000 | ||||||
Dividends and Distributions Payable | 16,303 | 13,124 | ||||||
Deferred Revenue | 1,837 | 1,823 | ||||||
Accrued Interest Payable | 3,412 | 2,210 | ||||||
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | 354 | 677 | ||||||
Operating | 10,811 | 4,866 | ||||||
Lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $11,357 and $7,079 at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively | 30,350 | 30,047 | ||||||
Interest Rate Swaps | 242 | 1,994 | ||||||
Deferred Income Taxes | 475 | 705 | ||||||
Tenant Deposits | 97 | 94 | ||||||
Total Liabilities | 583,444 | 456,462 | ||||||
EQUITY | ||||||||
Common stock, $.0001 par value, 45,000,000 shares authorized, 31,004,900 and 26,164,977 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively | 3 | 3 | ||||||
Preferred Stock, $.0001 par value per share, 4,000,000 shares authorized | ||||||||
Series A junior participating preferred stock, $.0001 par value, 200,000 authorized, no shares issued and outstanding | - | - | ||||||
Additional paid-in-capital | 936,046 | 712,069 | ||||||
Dividends in excess of net income | (28,763 | ) | (28,558 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 1,375 | (536 | ) | |||||
Total Equity - Agree Realty Corporation | 908,661 | 682,978 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest | 2,529 | 2,532 | ||||||
Total Equity | 911,190 | 685,510 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 1,494,634 | $ | 1,141,972 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F- 7 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands, except share and per-share data)
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Revenues | ||||||||||||
Minimum rents | $ | 105,074 | $ | 84,031 | $ | 64,278 | ||||||
Percentage rents | 244 | 197 | 180 | |||||||||
Operating cost reimbursement | 10,752 | 7,267 | 5,277 | |||||||||
Other | 485 | 32 | 231 | |||||||||
Total Revenues | 116,555 | 91,527 | 69,966 | |||||||||
Operating Expenses | ||||||||||||
Real estate taxes | 8,204 | 5,459 | 4,005 | |||||||||
Property operating expenses | 3,610 | 2,484 | 1,768 | |||||||||
Land lease expense | 653 | 653 | 606 | |||||||||
General and administrative | 9,949 | 8,015 | 6,988 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 31,752 | 23,407 | 16,486 | |||||||||
Total Operating Expenses | 54,168 | 40,018 | 29,853 | |||||||||
Income from Operations | 62,387 | 51,509 | 40,113 | |||||||||
Other (Expense) Income | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net | (18,137 | ) | (15,343 | ) | (12,305 | ) | ||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of assets, net | 14,193 | 9,964 | 12,135 | |||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | - | (333 | ) | (181 | ) | |||||||
Other income | 347 | - | - | |||||||||
Net Income | 58,790 | 45,797 | 39,762 | |||||||||
Less Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interest | 678 | 679 | 744 | |||||||||
Net Income Attributable to Agree Realty Corporation | $ | 58,112 | $ | 45,118 | $ | 39,018 | ||||||
Net Income Per Share Attributable to Agree Realty Corporation | ||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 2.09 | $ | 1.97 | $ | 2.17 | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 2.08 | $ | 1.97 | $ | 2.16 | ||||||
Other Comprehensive Income | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 58,790 | $ | 45,797 | $ | 39,762 | ||||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Gain (Loss) on Interest Rate Swaps | 1,935 | 2,618 | (1,093 | ) | ||||||||
Total Comprehensive Income | 60,725 | 48,415 | 38,669 | |||||||||
Less Comprehensive Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interest | 702 | 703 | 724 | |||||||||
Comprehensive Income Attributable to | ||||||||||||
Agree Realty Corporation | $ | 60,023 | $ | 47,712 | $ | 37,945 | ||||||
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding - Basic: | 27,625,102 | 22,868,736 | 18,003,122 | |||||||||
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding - Diluted: | 27,700,347 | 22,959,799 | 18,065,415 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F- 8 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per-share data)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends in | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional | excess of net | Comprehensive | Non-Controlling | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Paid-In Capital | income | Income (Loss) | Interest | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2014 | 17,539,946 | $ | 1 | $ | 388,263 | $ | (32,584 | ) | $ | (2,060 | ) | $ | 2,415 | $ | 356,035 | |||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs | 3,043,812 | 1 | 92,259 | - | - | - | 92,260 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock under the Omnibus Incentive Plan | 85,597 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture of restricted stock | (32,054 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting of restricted stock | - | - | 1,992 | - | - | - | 1,992 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends and distributions declared for the period | - | - | - | (34,696 | ) | - | (640 | ) | (35,336 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) - change in fair value | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
of interest rate swaps | - | - | - | - | (1,070 | ) | (23 | ) | (1,093 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income | - | - | - | 39,018 | - | 744 | 39,762 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2015 | 20,637,301 | $ | 2 | $ | 482,514 | $ | (28,262 | ) | $ | (3,130 | ) | $ | 2,496 | $ | 453,620 | |||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs | 5,461,459 | 1 | 228,010 | - | - | - | 228,011 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common shares | (20,569 | ) | - | (712 | ) | - | - | - | (712 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock under the Omnibus Incentive Plan | 93,363 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture of restricted stock | (6,577 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting of restricted stock | - | - | 2,257 | - | - | - | 2,257 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends and distributions declared for the period | - | - | - | (45,414 | ) | - | (667 | ) | (46,081 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) - change in fair value of interest rate swaps | - | - | - | - | 2,594 | 24 | 2,618 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | - | - | - | 45,118 | - | 679 | 45,797 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2016 | 26,164,977 | $ | 3 | $ | 712,069 | $ | (28,558 | ) | $ | (536 | ) | $ | 2,532 | $ | 685,510 | |||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs | 4,786,604 | - | 222,695 | - | - | - | 222,695 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common shares | (23,925 | ) | - | (1,111 | ) | - | - | - | (1,111 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock under the Omnibus Incentive Plan | 88,466 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture of restricted stock | (11,222 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting of restricted stock | - | - | 2,393 | - | - | - | 2,393 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends and distributions declared for the period | - | - | - | (58,317 | ) | - | (705 | ) | (59,022 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) - change in fair value of interest rate swaps | - | - | - | - | 1,911 | 24 | 1,935 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | - | - | - | 58,112 | - | 678 | 58,790 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2017 | 31,004,900 | $ | 3 | $ | 936,046 | $ | (28,763 | ) | $ | 1,375 | $ | 2,529 | $ | 911,190 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F- 9 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 58,790 | $ | 45,797 | $ | 39,762 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Depreciation | 19,586 | 15,274 | 11,530 | |||||||||
Amortization | 12,166 | 8,133 | 4,956 | |||||||||
Amortization from financing and credit facility costs | 979 | 720 | 689 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 2,393 | 2,257 | 1,992 | |||||||||
Write-off of deferred costs | - | 333 | 181 | |||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of assets | (14,193 | ) | (9,964 | ) | (12,135 | ) | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable | (4,216 | ) | (4,117 | ) | (2,911 | ) | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets | 444 | (109 | ) | (197 | ) | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable | 5,265 | 1,984 | 1,043 | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | 14 | 115 | (463 | ) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest | 1,202 | 1,247 | 241 | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in deferred taxes | (230 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in tenant deposits | 3 | 65 | (8 | ) | ||||||||
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | 82,203 | 61,735 | 44,680 | |||||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities | ||||||||||||
Acquisition of real estate investments and other assets | (319,572 | ) | (297,868 | ) | (223,871 | ) | ||||||
Development of real estate investments and other assets | ||||||||||||
(including capitalized interest of $570 in 2017, $210 in 2016, and $39 in 2015) | (43,302 | ) | (27,919 | ) | (6,970 | ) | ||||||
Payment of leasing costs | (568 | ) | (686 | ) | (66 | ) | ||||||
Cash held in escrows from sale of assets | (7,975 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Net proceeds from sale of assets | 44,343 | 28,919 | 28,132 | |||||||||
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | (327,074 | ) | (297,554 | ) | (202,775 | ) | ||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from common stock offerings, net | 222,695 | 228,011 | 92,260 | |||||||||
Repurchase of common shares | (1,111 | ) | (712 | ) | - | |||||||
Unsecured revolving credit facility borrowings | 203,000 | 252,000 | 161,000 | |||||||||
Unsecured revolving credit facility repayments | (203,000 | ) | (256,000 | ) | (158,000 | ) | ||||||
Payments of mortgage notes payable | (2,412 | ) | (31,578 | ) | (5,178 | ) | ||||||
Unsecured term loan proceeds | - | 60,283 | - | |||||||||
Payments of unsecured term loans | (739 | ) | (239 | ) | - | |||||||
Senior unsecured notes proceeds | 100,000 | 60,000 | 100,000 | |||||||||
Dividends paid | (55,146 | ) | (42,058 | ) | (32,992 | ) | ||||||
Distributions to Non-Controlling Interest | (695 | ) | (657 | ) | (636 | ) | ||||||
Debt extinguishment costs | - | - | (150 | ) | ||||||||
Payments for financing costs | (309 | ) | (2,548 | ) | (896 | ) | ||||||
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | 262,283 | 266,502 | 155,408 | |||||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | 17,412 | 30,683 | (2,687 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period | 33,395 | 2,712 | 5,399 | |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period | $ | 50,807 | $ | 33,395 | $ | 2,712 | ||||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information | ||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest (net of amounts capitalized) | $ | 17,331 | $ | 13,822 | $ | 11,548 | ||||||
Cash paid (refunded) for income tax | $ | 257 | $ | 153 | $ | 155 | ||||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities | ||||||||||||
Shares issued under equity incentive plans (in dollars) | $ | 4,298 | $ | 3,517 | $ | 2,864 | ||||||
Dividends and limited partners' distributions declared and unpaid | $ | 16,303 | $ | 13,124 | $ | 9,758 | ||||||
Real Estate acquisitions financed with debt assumption | $ | 21,500 | $ | - | $ | - |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F- 10 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
Note 1 – Organization
Agree Realty Corporation (the “Company”), a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) primarily focused on the ownership, acquisition, development and management of retail properties net leased to industry leading tenants. The Company was founded in 1971 by its current Executive Chairman, Richard Agree, and our common stock was listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) in 1994.
Our assets are held by, and all of our operations are conducted through, directly or indirectly, Agree Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), of which Agree Realty Corporation is the sole general partner and in which it held a 98.8% interest as of December 31, 2017. Under the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, Agree Realty Corporation, as the sole general partner, has exclusive responsibility and discretion in the management and control of the Operating Partnership.
The terms “Agree Realty,” the "Company," “Management,” "we,” “our” or "us" refer to Agree Realty Corporation and all of its consolidated subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership.
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of Agree Realty Corporation include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company, as the sole general partner, held 98.8% and 98.7% of the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. All material intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of (1) assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, and (2) revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications of prior period amounts have been made in the consolidated financial statements and footnotes in order to conform to the current presentation. Prepaid rents are presented on the Balance Sheet as Deferred Revenue; in previously filed reports prepaid rents were presented in Accounts Payable - Operating. The classification of below-market lease intangibles are presented net of accumulated amortization as a Liability; in previously filed reports below-market lease intangibles were presented in Unamortized Deferred Expenses: Lease Intangibles, net with in-place and above-market lease intangibles. As of December 31, 2017, all fully amortized deferred credit facility financing costs attributable to the credit facility were written off.
Segment Reporting
The Company is primarily in the business of acquiring, developing and managing retail real estate which is considered to be one reporting segment. The Company has no other reportable segments.
Real Estate Investments
The Company records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. For properties developed by the Company, all direct and indirect costs related to planning, development and construction, including interest, real estate taxes and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the construction period, are capitalized for financial reporting purposes and recorded as property under development until construction has been completed. Properties classified as “held for sale” are recorded at the lower of their carrying value or their fair value, less anticipated selling costs. Assets are generally classified as held for sale once management has actively engaged in marketing the asset and has received a firm purchase commitment that is expected to close within one year.
F- 11 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
Accounting for Acquisitions of Real Estate
The acquisition of property for investment purposes is typically accounted for as an asset acquisition. The Company allocates the purchase price to land, buildings and identified intangible assets and liabilities, based in each case on their relative estimated fair values and without giving rise to goodwill. Intangible assets and liabilities represent the value of in-place leases and above- or below-market leases. In making estimates of fair values, the Company may use a number of sources, including data provided by independent third parties, as well as information obtained by the Company as a result of its due diligence, including expected future cash flows of the property and various characteristics of the markets where the property is located.
In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, in-place lease intangibles are valued based on the Company’s estimates of costs related to tenant acquisition and the carrying costs that would be incurred during the time it would take to locate a tenant if the property were vacant, considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases at the time of the acquisition. Above- and below-market lease intangibles are recorded based on the present value of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the leases at the time of acquisition and the Company’s estimate of current market lease rates for the property. The capitalized above- and below-market lease intangibles are amortized over the non-cancelable term of the lease unless the Company believes it is reasonably certain that the tenant will renew the lease for an option term whereby the Company amortizes the value attributable to the renewal over the renewal period.
The fair value of identified intangible assets and liabilities acquired is amortized to depreciation and amortization over the remaining term of the related leases.
Depreciation
The Company’s real estate portfolio is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated remaining useful life of the properties, which are generally 40 years for buildings and 10 to 20 years for improvements. Properties classified as “held for sale” and properties under development are not depreciated.
Impairments
The Company reviews its real estate investments periodically for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Events or circumstances that may occur include, but are not limited to, significant changes in real estate market conditions or our ability to re-lease or sell properties that are vacant or become vacant. Management determines whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. An asset is considered impaired if its carrying value exceeds its estimated undiscounted cash flows and an impairment charge is recorded in the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and money market accounts. The account balances periodically exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance coverage, and as a result, there is a concentration of credit risk related to amounts on deposit in excess of FDIC insurance coverage. We had $57.5 million and $32.4 million in cash and cash held in escrow as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, in excess of the FDIC insured limit.
Accounts Receivable – Tenants
The Company reviews its rent receivables for collectability on a regular basis, taking into consideration changes in factors such as the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area where the property is located. In the event that the collectability of a receivable with respect to any tenant is in doubt, a provision for uncollectible amounts will be established or a direct write-off of the specific rent receivable will be made. For accrued rental revenues related to the straight-line method of reporting rental revenue, the Company performs a periodic review of receivable balances to assess the risk of uncollectible amounts and establish appropriate provisions.
The Company’s leases provide for reimbursement from tenants for common area maintenance (“CAM”), insurance, real estate taxes and other operating expenses ("Operating Cost Reimbursement Revenue"). A portion of our Operating Cost Reimbursement Revenue is estimated each period and is recognized as revenue in the period the recoverable costs are incurred and accrued. Receivables from Operating Cost Reimbursement Revenue are included in our Accounts Receivable - Tenants line item in our consolidated balance sheets. The balance of unbilled Operating Cost Reimbursement Receivable at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $1.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
F- 12 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
In addition, many of the Company’s leases contain rent escalations for which we recognize revenue on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable lease term. This method results in rental revenue in the early years of a lease being higher than actual cash received, creating a straight-line rent receivable asset which is included in the Accounts Receivable - Tenants line item in our consolidated balance sheet. The balance of straight-line rent receivables at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $12.9 million and $9.6 million, respectively. To the extent any of the tenants under these leases become unable to pay their contractual cash rents, the Company may be required to write down the straight-line rent receivable from those tenants, which would reduce operating income.
Sales Tax
The Company collects various taxes from tenants and remits these amounts, on a net basis, to the applicable taxing authorities.
Unamortized Deferred Expenses
Deferred expenses include debt financing costs related to the line of credit, leasing costs and lease intangibles. The expenses are amortized as follows: (i) debt financing costs related to the line of credit on a straight-line basis to interest expense over the term of the related loan, which approximates the effective interest method; (ii) leasing costs on a straight-line basis to depreciation and amortization over the term of the related lease entered into; and (iii) lease intangibles on a straight-line basis to depreciation and amortization over the remaining term of the related lease acquired.
The following schedule summarizes the Company’s amortization of deferred expenses for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively (in thousands):
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Credit Facility Financing Costs | $ | 405 | $ | 228 | $ | 225 | ||||||
Leasing Costs | 161 | 124 | 97 | |||||||||
Lease Intangibles (Asset) | 16,060 | 11,093 | 6,598 | |||||||||
Lease Intangibles (Liability) | (4,275 | ) | (3,083 | ) | (1,739 | ) | ||||||
Total | $ | 12,351 | $ | 8,362 | $ | 5,181 |
The following schedule represents estimated future amortization of deferred expenses as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Facility Financing Costs | $ | 394 | $ | 380 | $ | 379 | $ | 21 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,174 | ||||||||||||||
Leasing Costs | 179 | 221 | 210 | 195 | 208 | 570 | 1,583 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lease Intangibles (Asset) | 20,151 | 19,383 | 18,917 | 18,241 | 17,161 | 101,305 | 195,158 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lease Intangibles (Liability) | (4,403 | ) | (4,329 | ) | (4,229 | ) | (3,944 | ) | (3,044 | ) | (10,401 | ) | (30,350 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 16,321 | $ | 15,655 | $ | 15,277 | $ | 14,513 | $ | 14,325 | $ | 91,474 | $ | 167,565 |
Revenue Recognition
The Company leases real estate to its tenants under long-term net leases which we account for as operating leases. Under this method, leases that have fixed and determinable rent increases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Rental increases based upon changes in the consumer price indexes, or other variable factors, are recognized only after changes in such factors have occurred and are then applied according to the lease agreements. Certain leases also provide for additional rent based on tenants’ sales volumes. These rents are recognized when determinable after the tenant exceeds a sales breakpoint. Contractually obligated reimbursements from tenants for recoverable real estate taxes and operating expenses are generally included in operating costs reimbursement in the period when such expenses are recorded.
F- 13 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
Earnings per Share
Earnings per share have been computed by dividing the net income (less income attributable to unvested restricted stock), by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (less unvested restricted stock). Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (less income attributable to unvested restricted stock), by the weighted average common and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding in accordance with the treasury stock method.
The following is a reconciliation of the denominator of the basic net earnings per common share computation to the denominator of the diluted net earnings per common share computation for each of the periods presented:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 27,852,231 | 23,096,267 | 18,215,628 | |||||||||
Less: Unvested restricted stock | (227,129 | ) | (227,531 | ) | (212,506 | ) | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in basic earnings per share | 27,625,102 | 22,868,736 | 18,003,122 | |||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in basic earnings per share | 27,625,102 | 22,868,736 | 18,003,122 | |||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: restricted stock | 75,245 | 91,063 | 62,293 | |||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in diluted earnings per share | 27,700,347 | 22,959,799 | 18,065,415 |
Income Taxes
The Company has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”) and related regulations. The Company generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders, providing it distributes 100% of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, the Company believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding the Company’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, the Company is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.
The Company and its taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) have made a timely TRS election pursuant to the provisions of the REIT Modernization Act. A TRS is able to engage in activities resulting in income that previously would have been disqualified from being eligible REIT income under the federal income tax regulations. As a result, certain activities of the Company which occur within its TRS entity are subject to federal and state income taxes (See Note 7). All provisions for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are attributable to the Company’s TRS.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The Company’s estimates of fair value of financial and non-financial assets and liabilities are based on the framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. The framework specifies a hierarchy of valuation inputs which was established to increase consistency, clarity and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The guidance describes a fair value hierarchy based upon three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, two of which are considered observable and one that is considered unobservable. The following describes the three levels:
Level 1 – | Valuation is based upon quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
Level 2 – | Valuation is based upon inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
Level 3 – | Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques. |
F- 14 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (”FASB”) issued ASU No. 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities” (“ASU 2017-12”). The objective of ASU 2017-12 is to expand hedge accounting for both financial (interest rate) and commodity risks, and create more transparency around how economic results are presented, both on the face of the financial statements and in the footnotes. ASU 2017-12 will be effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods in the year of adoption. Early adoption is permitted for any interim or annual period. The Company is in the process of determining the impact that the implementation of ASU 2017-12 will have on the Company’s financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting” (“ASU 2017-09”). The objective of ASU 2017-09 is to provide guidance on determining which changes to the terms and conditions of share-based payment awards require an entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 718. ASU 2017-09 will be effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods in the year of adoption. Early adoption is permitted for any interim or annual period. The Company has evaluated the impact that ASU 2017-09 will have on the Company’s financial statements, and concluded the implementation of ASU 2017-09 has no material impact on the financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU 2017-01”). The objective of ASU 2017-01 is to clarify the definition of a business by adding guidance on how entities should evaluate whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. ASU 2017-01 will be effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods in the year of adoption. Early adoption is permitted for any interim or annual period. The Company has early adopted and the guidance has no material impact on the financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 “Leases” (“ASU 2016-02”). The new standard creates Topic 842, Leases, in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (FASB ASC) and supersedes FASB ASC 840, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases (operating and finance). However, for leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election to not recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. The main difference between the existing guidance on accounting for leases and the new standard is that operating leases will now be recorded in the statement of financial position as assets and liabilities. The new standard requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases and operating leases. ASU 2016-02 is expected to impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements as the Company has certain operating land lease arrangements for which it is the lessee. GAAP requires only capital (finance) leases to be recognized in the statement of financial position, and amounts related to operating leases largely are reflected in the financial statements as rent expense on the income statement and in disclosures to the financial statements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim periods within those annual periods) beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has engaged a professional services firm to assist in the implementation of ASU 2016-02. The Company anticipates that its retail leases where it is the lessor will continue to be accounted for as operating leases under the new standard. Therefore, the Company does not currently anticipate significant changes in the accounting for its lease revenues. The Company is also the lessee under various land lease arrangements and it will be required to recognize right of use assets and related lease liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets upon adoption. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact of adopting the new leases standard on its consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and consolidated balance sheets.
In May 2014, with subsequent updates issued in August 2015 and March, April and May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 was developed to enable financial statement users to better understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The update’s core principle is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Companies are to use a five-step contract review model to ensure revenue is recognized, measured and disclosed in accordance with this principle. Those steps are (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when or as the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
F- 15 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
The Company has identified four main revenue streams of which three of them originate from lease contracts and will be subject to Leases ASU 2016-02, Topic 842 effective for annual reporting periods (including interim periods) beginning after December 15, 2018. The revenue streams are:
Revenue Recognition (ASU 2014-09, Topic 610-20):
· | Gain (loss) on sale of real estate properties |
Leases (ASU 2016-02, Topic 842):
· | Rental revenues |
· | Straight line rents |
· | Tenant recoveries |
As of January 1, 2018, the Company will be accounting for the sale of real estate properties under Subtopic 610-20 which provides for revenue recognition based on transfer of ownership. All properties were non-financial real estate assets and thus not businesses which were sold to non-customers with no performance obligations. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company sold real estate properties for net proceeds of $44.3 million, and a recorded net gain of $14.2 million.
Management has concluded that all of the Company’s material revenue streams falls outside of the scope of this guidance and currently recognizes revenue from its contracts with customers at a point in time and does not anticipate any changes. The Company intends to implement the standard under the modified retrospective method and does not anticipate any cumulative effect recognized in retained earnings at the date of adoption (January 1, 2018).
Note 3 – Real Estate Investments
Real Estate Portfolio
As of December 31, 2017, the Company owned 436 properties, with a total gross leasable area of approximately 8.7 million square feet. Net Real Estate Investments totaled $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, the Company owned 366 properties, with a total gross leasable area of 7.0 million square feet. Net Real Estate Investments totaled $950.3 million as of December 31, 2016.
Tenant Leases
The properties that the Company owns are typically leased to tenants under long term operating leases. The leases are generally net leases which typically require the tenant to be responsible for minimum monthly rent and property operating expenses including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. Certain of our properties are subject to leases under which we retain responsibility for specific costs and expenses of the property. The leases typically provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options subject to generally the same terms and conditions, including rent increases, consistent with the initial lease term.
As of December 31, 2017, the future minimum lease payments to be received under the terms of all non-cancellable tenant leases is as follows (in thousands):
For the Year Ending December 31, | ||||
2018 | $ | 114,983 | ||
2019 | 114,338 | |||
2020 | 112,189 | |||
2021 | 108,576 | |||
2022 | 104,531 | |||
Thereafter | 682,299 | |||
Total | $ | 1,236,916 |
F- 16 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
Since lease renewal periods are exercisable at the option of the tenant, the above table only presents future minimum lease payments due during the current lease terms. In addition, this table does not include amounts for potential variable rent increases that are based on the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) or future contingent rents which may be received on the leases based on a percentage of the tenant’s gross sales.
Of these future minimum rents, approximately 6.5% of the total is attributable to Walgreens as of December 31, 2017. The loss of this tenant or the inability of them to pay rent could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business.
Deferred Revenue
As of December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, there was $1.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively, in deferred revenues resulting from rents paid in advance.
In July 2004, the Company’s tenant in a joint venture property located in Boynton Beach, FL repaid $4.0 million that had been contributed by the Company’s joint venture partner. As a result of this repayment, the Company became the sole member of the limited liability company holding the property. Total assets of the property were approximately $4.0 million. The Company has treated the $4.0 million as deferred revenue and accordingly, will recognize rental income over the term of the related leases. The remaining deferred revenue for the Boynton Beach, FL property was fully recognized in 2016.
Land Lease Obligations
The Company is subject to land lease agreements for certain of its properties. Land lease expense was $0.7 million, $0.7 million, and $0.6 million for the years ending December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, future annual lease commitments under these agreements are as follows (in thousands):
For the Year Ending December 31, | ||||
2018 | $ | 641 | ||
2019 | 634 | |||
2020 | 632 | |||
2021 | 588 | |||
2022 | 505 | |||
Thereafter | 7,342 | |||
Total | $ | 10,342 |
Acquisitions
During 2017, the Company purchased 79 retail net lease assets for approximately $338.0 million, including acquisition and closing costs. These properties are located in 27 states and 100% leased to 49 different tenants operating in 22 unique retail sectors for a weighted average lease term of approximately 11.1 years. None of the Company’s investments during 2017 caused any new or existing tenant to comprise 10% or more of the Company’s total assets or generate 10% or more of the Company’s total annualized base rent at December 31, 2017.
The aggregate 2017 acquisitions were allocated approximately $94.1 million to land, $172.0 million to buildings and improvements, and $71.9 million to lease intangibles and other assets. The acquisitions were substantially all cash purchases and there was no contingent consideration associated with these acquisitions. In one acquisition, the Company assumed debt of $21.5 million.
During 2016, the Company purchased 82 retail net lease assets for approximately $295.6 million, including acquisition and closing costs. These properties are located in 27 states and 100% leased to 49 different tenants operating in 22 unique retail sectors for a weighted average lease term of approximately 10.7 years. None of the Company’s investments during 2016 caused any new or existing tenant to comprise 10% or more of the Company’s total assets or generate 10% or more of the Company’s total annualized base rent at December 31, 2016.
F- 17 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
The aggregate 2016 acquisitions were allocated approximately $84.3 million to land, $170.0 million to buildings and improvements, and $41.3 million to lease intangibles and other assets. The acquisitions were substantially all cash purchases and there was no contingent consideration associated with these acquisitions.
Developments
During the fourth quarter of 2017, construction continued or commenced on seven development and Partner Capital Solutions (“PCS”) projects with anticipated total project costs of approximately $41.3 million. The projects consist of the Company’s first PCS project with Art Van Furniture in Canton, Michigan; four development projects with Mister Car Wash; one Burger King development in North Ridgeville, Ohio; and the Company’s third project with Camping World in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, the Company had 11 development or PCS projects completed or under construction. Anticipated total costs for those projects are approximately $62.7 million and include the following completed or commenced projects:
Tenant | Location | Lease Structure |
Lease
Term |
Actual or
Anticipated Rent Commencement |
Status | |||||
Camping World | Tyler, TX | Build-to-Suit | 20 Years | Q1 2017 | Completed | |||||
Burger King(1) | Heber, UT | Build-to-Suit | 20 Years | Q1 2017 | Completed | |||||
Camping World | Georgetown, KY | Build-to-Suit | 20 Years | Q2 2017 | Completed | |||||
Orchard Supply | Boynton Beach, FL | Build-to-Suit | 15 Years | Q3 2017 | Completed | |||||
Mister Car Wash | Urbandale, IA | Build-to-Suit | 20 years | Q1 2018 | Under Construction | |||||
Mister Car Wash | Bernalillo, NM | Build-to-Suit | 20 years | Q1 2018 | Under Construction | |||||
Art Van Furniture | Canton, MI | Build-to-Suit | 20 years | Q1 2018 | Under Construction | |||||
Burger King(2) | North Ridgeville, OH | Build-to-Suit | 20 years | Q1 2018 | Under Construction | |||||
Camping World | Grand Rapids, MI | Build-to-Suit | 20 years | Q2 2018 | Under Construction | |||||
Mister Car Wash | Orlando, FL | Build-to-Suit | 20 years | Q3 2018 | Under Construction | |||||
Mister Car Wash | Tavares, FL | Build-to-Suit | 20 years | Q3 2018 | Under Construction |
Notes:
(1) Franchise restaurant operated by Meridian Restaurants Unlimited, L.C.
(2) Franchise restaurant operated by TOMS King, LLC.
F- 18 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
Dispositions
During 2017, the Company sold real estate properties for net proceeds of $44.3 million and a recorded net gain of $14.2 million (net of any expected losses on real estate held for sale).
During 2016, the Company sold real estate properties for net proceeds of $27.9 million and a recorded net gain of $10.0 million (net of any expected losses on real estate held for sale).
During 2015, the Company sold real estate properties for net proceeds of $28.1 million and a recorded net gain of $12.1 million (net of any expected losses on real estate held for sale).
Impairments
As a result of our review of Real Estate Investments we did not recognize any real estate impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
Note 4 – Debt
In April 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-03, which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the gross carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. We adopted ASU 2015-03, effective March 31, 2016, and applied the guidance retrospectively to our Mortgage Notes Payable, Unsecured Term Loans and Senior Unsecured Notes for all periods presented. Unamortized debt issuance costs of approximately $2.8 million and $3.1 million are included as an offset to the respective debt balances as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively (previously included in Unamortized Deferred Expenses on our Consolidated Balance Sheets).
As of December 31, 2017, we had total indebtedness of $522.4 million, including (i) $89.1 million of mortgage notes payable; (ii) $159.3 million of unsecured term loans; (iii) $260.0 million of senior unsecured notes; and (iv) $14.0 million of borrowings under our Credit Facility.
Mortgage Notes Payable
As of December 31, 2017, the Company had total gross mortgage indebtedness of $89.1 million which was collateralized by related real estate and tenants’ leases with an aggregate net book value of $142.1 million. Including mortgages that have been swapped to a fixed interest rate, the weighted average interest rate on the Company’s mortgage notes payable was 3.74% as of December 31, 2017 and 3.97% as of December 31, 2016.
In December 2017, the Company assumed an interest only mortgage note for $21.5 million with PNC Bank, National Association in connection with an acquisition. The mortgage note is due October 2019, secured by a multi-tenant property and has a fixed interest rate of 3.32%.
F- 19 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
Mortgages payable consisted of the following:
The mortgage loans encumbering our properties are generally non-recourse, subject to certain exceptions for which we would be liable for any resulting losses incurred by the lender. These exceptions vary from loan to loan, but generally include fraud or material misrepresentations, misstatements or omissions by the borrower, intentional or grossly negligent conduct by the borrower that harms the property or results in a loss to the lender, filing of a bankruptcy petition by the borrower, either directly or indirectly, and certain environmental liabilities. At December 31, 2017, there were no mortgage loans with partial recourse to us.
We have entered into mortgage loans which are secured by multiple properties and contain cross-default and cross-collateralization provisions. Cross-collateralization provisions allow a lender to foreclose on multiple properties in the event that we default under the loan. Cross-default provisions allow a lender to foreclose on the related property in the event a default is declared under another loan.
The Company was in compliance with covenant terms for all mortgages payable at December 31, 2017.
F- 20 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
Senior Unsecured Notes
The following table presents the Senior Unsecured Notes balance net of unamortized debt issuance costs as of December 31, 2017, and 2016 (in thousands):
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
2025 Senior Unsecured Notes | $ | 50,000 | $ | 50,000 | ||||
2027 Senior Unsecured Notes | 50,000 | 50,000 | ||||||
2028 Senior Unsecured Notes | 60,000 | 60,000 | ||||||
2029 Senior Unsecured Notes | 100,000 | - | ||||||
Total Principal | 260,000 | 160,000 | ||||||
Unamortized debt issuance costs | (878 | ) | (824 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | 259,122 | $ | 159,176 |
In May 2015, the Company completed a private placement of $100.0 million principal amount of senior unsecured notes. The senior unsecured notes were sold in two series; $50.0 million of 4.16% notes due May 2025 and $50.0 million of 4.26% notes due May 2027. The weighted average term of the senior unsecured notes is 11 years and the weighted average interest rate is 4.21%.
In July 2016, the Company entered into a note purchase agreement with institutional purchasers. Pursuant to the note purchase agreement, the Operating Partnership completed a private placement of $60.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.42% senior unsecured notes due July 2028. The senior unsecured notes were sold only to institutional investors and did not involve a public offering in reliance on the exemption from registration in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
In August 2017, the Company entered into a note purchase agreement with institutional purchasers. Pursuant to the note purchase agreement, the Operating Partnership completed a private placement of $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.19% senior unsecured notes due September 2029. The senior unsecured notes are guaranteed by the Company. The closing of the private placement was consummated in September 2017; and, on that date, the Operating Partnership issued the senior unsecured notes. The senior unsecured notes were sold only to institutional investors and did not involve a public offering in reliance on the exemption from registration in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
Unsecured Term Loan Facilities
The following table presents the Unsecured Term Loans balance net of unamortized debt issuance costs as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
2019 Term Loan | $ | 19,304 | $ | 20,044 | ||||
2023 Term Loan | 40,000 | 40,000 | ||||||
2024 Term Loans | 100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
Total Principal | 159,304 | 160,044 | ||||||
Unamortized debt issuance costs | (1,133 | ) | (1,365 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | 158,171 | $ | 158,679 |
The amended and restated credit agreement, described below, extended the maturity dates of the $65.0 million unsecured term loan facility and $35.0 million unsecured term loan facility (together, the “2024 Term Loan Facilities”) to January 2024. In connection with entering into the amended and restated credit agreement, the prior notes evidencing the existing $65.0 million unsecured term loan facility and $35.0 million unsecured term loan facility were canceled and new notes evidencing the 2024 Term Loan Facilities were executed. Borrowings under the unsecured 2024 Term Loan Facilities bear interest at a variable LIBOR plus 165 to 235 basis points, depending on the Company's leverage ratio. The Company utilized existing interest rate swaps to effectively fix the LIBOR rate (refer to Note 8 – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity).
F- 21 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
In July 2016, the Company completed a $40.0 million unsecured term loan facility that matures July 2023 (the “2023 Term Loan”). Borrowings under the 2023 Term Loan are priced at LIBOR plus 165 to 225 basis points, depending on the Company’s leverage. The Company entered into an interest rate swap to fix LIBOR at 140 basis points until maturity. As of December 31, 2017, $40.0 million was outstanding under the 2023 Term Loan, which was subject to an all-in interest rate of 3.05%.
In August 2016, the Company entered into a $20.3 million unsecured amortizing term loan that matures May 2019 (the “2019 Term Loan”). Borrowings under the 2019 Term Loan are priced at LIBOR plus 170 basis points. In order to fix LIBOR on the 2019 Term Loan at 1.92% until maturity, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement in place, which was assigned by the lender under the Mortgage Note to the 2019 Term Loan lender. As of December 31, 2017, $19.3 million was outstanding under the 2019 Term Loan bearing an all-in interest rate of 3.62%.
Senior Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility
In December 2016, the Company amended and restated the credit agreement that governs the Company's senior unsecured revolving credit facility and the Company's unsecured term loan facility to increase the aggregate borrowing capacity to $350.0 million. The agreement provides for a $250.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, a $65.0 million unsecured term loan facility and a $35.0 million unsecured term loan facility (Referenced above as 2024 Term Loan Facilities). The unsecured revolving credit facility matures January 2021 with options to extend the maturity date to January 2022. The 2024 Term Loan Facilities mature January 2024. The Company has the ability to increase the aggregate borrowing capacity under the credit agreement up to $500.0 million, subject to lender approval. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 130 to 195 basis points, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. Additionally, the Company is required to pay an unused commitment fee at an annual rate of 15 or 25 basis points of the unused portion of the revolving credit facility, depending on the amount of borrowings outstanding. The credit agreement contains certain financial covenants, including a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, and a maximum percentage of secured debt to total asset value. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had $14.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility, respectively, bearing weighted average interest rates of approximately 2.6% and 1.9%, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, $236.0 million was available for borrowing under the revolving credit facility and the Company was in compliance with the credit agreement covenants.
Concurrent with the amendment and restatement of the Company’s senior unsecured revolving credit facility, conforming changes were made to the 2023 Term Loan and 2019 Term Loan.
Debt Maturities
The following table presents scheduled principal payments related to our debt as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
Scheduled | Balloon | |||||||||||
Principal | Payment | Total | ||||||||||
2018 | $ | 3,336 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 28,336 | ||||||
2019 | 2,751 | 40,044 | 42,795 | |||||||||
2020 | 1,092 | 2,775 | 3,867 | |||||||||
2021 (1) | 998 | 14,000 | 14,998 | |||||||||
2022 | 1,060 | - | 1,060 | |||||||||
Thereafter | 3,687 | 427,656 | 431,343 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 12,924 | $ | 509,475 | $ | 522,399 |
(1) | The balloon payment balance includes the balance outstanding under the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2017. The Credit Facility matures in January 2021, with options to extend the maturity for one year at the Company’s election, subject to certain conditions. |
F- 22 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
Note 5 – Common Stock
In April 2017, the Company entered into a new $200.0 million at-the-market equity program (“ATM program”) through which the Company may, from time to time, sell shares of common stock. The Company uses the proceeds generated from its ATM program for general corporate purposes, including funding our investment activity, the repayment or refinancing of outstanding indebtedness, working capital and other general purposes.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 2,368,359 shares of common stock under its ATM program at an average price of $49.17, realizing gross proceeds of approximately $116.5 million. The Company had approximately $83.5 million remaining under the ATM program as of December 31, 2017.
In May 2017, the Company filed an automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3, registering an unspecified amount at an indeterminant aggregate initial offering price of common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares and warrants. The Company may periodically offer one or more of these securities in amounts, prices and on terms to be announced when and if these securities are offered. The specifics of any future offerings, along with the use of proceeds of any securities offered, will be described in detail in a prospectus supplement, or other offering materials, at the time of any offering.
In June 2017, the Company completed a follow-on underwritten offering of 2,415,000 shares of common stock. The offering, which included the full exercise of the overallotment option by the underwriters, raised net proceeds of approximately $108.0 million, after deducting the underwriting discount. The proceeds from the offering were used to repay borrowings under our revolving credit facility to fund property acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.
In October 2016, under a previously filed shelf registration, the Company completed a follow-on underwritten offering of 2,087,250 shares of common stock. The offering, which included the full exercise of the overallotment option by the underwriters, raised net proceeds of approximately $95.0 million after deducting the underwriting discount. The proceeds from the offering were used to repay borrowings under our revolving credit facility to fund property acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.
In May 2016, under a previously filed shelf registration, the Company completed a follow-on underwritten offering of 2,875,000 shares of common stock. The offering, which included the full exercise of the overallotment option by the underwriters, raised net proceeds of approximately $109.6 million after deducting the underwriting discount. The proceeds from the offering were used to repay borrowings under our revolving credit facility to fund property acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.
Note 6 – Dividends and Distribution Payable
The Company declared dividends of $2.025, $1.920 and $1.845 per share during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015; the dividends have been reflected for federal income tax purposes as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
Ordinary Income | $ | 1.695 | $ | 1.557 | $ | 1.519 | ||||||
Return of Capital | 0.330 | 0.363 | 0.326 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 2.025 | $ | 1.920 | $ | 1.845 |
On December 5, 2017, the Company declared a dividend of $0.520 per share for the quarter ended December 31, 2017. The holders Operating Partnership Units were entitled to an equal distribution per Operating Partnership Unit held as of December 20, 2017. The dividends and distributions payable are recorded as liabilities in the Company's consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017. The dividend has been reflected as a reduction of stockholders' equity and the distribution has been reflected as a reduction of the limited partners' non-controlling interest. These amounts were paid on January 3, 2018.
F- 23 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
Note 7 – Income Taxes (not presented in thousands)
The Company is subject to the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Codification 740-10 (“FASB ASC 740-10”) and has analyzed its various federal and state filing positions. The Company believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions are documented and supported. Additionally, the Company believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded pursuant to FASB ASC 740-10. The Company’s Federal income tax returns are open for examination by taxing authorities for all tax years after December 31, 2014. The Company has elected to record related interest and penalties, if any, as income tax expense on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
For income tax purposes, the Company has certain TRS entities that have been established and in which certain real estate activities are conducted.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had accrued a deferred income tax liability in the amount of $475,000 and $705,000, respectively. This deferred income tax balance represents the federal and state tax effect of deferring income tax in 2007 on the sale of an asset under section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. This transaction was accrued within the TRS entities described above. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized net federal and state tax expense of approximately $227,000 and $157,000, respectively, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code that will affect 2017, including but not limited to reducing the U.S. federal corporate rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. In connection with our initial analysis of the impact of the Tax Act, we have recorded a discrete net tax benefit related to one of the Company’s TRS entities reducing the deferred income tax liability by $230,000 in the period ending December 31, 2017. This is included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
Note 8 – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity
The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risk, including interest rate, liquidity and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources and duration of its debt funding and, to a limited extent, the use of derivative instruments. For additional information regarding the leveling of our derivatives, (refer to Note 10 – Fair Value Measurements.)
The Company’s objective in using interest rate derivatives is to manage its exposure to interest rate movements and add stability to interest expense. To accomplish this objective, the Company uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed rate payments over the life of the agreement without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
In April 2012, the Company entered into an amortizing forward-starting interest rate swap agreement to hedge against changes in future cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $22.3 million in variable-rate borrowings. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company receives from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on 1 month LIBOR and pays to the counterparty a fixed rate of 1.92%. The notional amount as of December 31, 2017 is $19.3 million. This swap effectively converted $22.3 million of variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings from July 1, 2013 to May 1, 2019. As of December 31, 2017, this interest rate swap was valued as a liability of approximately $0.0 million.
In December 2012, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge against changes in future cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $25.0 million in variable-rate borrowings. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company receives from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on 1 month LIBOR and pays to the counterparty a fixed rate of 0.89%. This swap effectively converted $25.0 million of variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings from December 6, 2012 to April 4, 2018. As of December 31, 2017, this interest rate swap was valued as an asset of approximately $0.0 million.
F- 24 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
In September 2013, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge against changes in future cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $35.0 million in variable-rate borrowings. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company receives from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on 1 month LIBOR and pays to the counterparty a fixed rate of 2.20%. This swap effectively converted $35.0 million of variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings from October 3, 2013 to September 29, 2020. As of December 31, 2017, this interest rate swap was valued as a liability of approximately $0.2 million.
In July 2014, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge against changes in future cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $65.0 million in variable-rate borrowings. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company receives from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on 1 month LIBOR and pays to the counterparty a fixed rate of 2.09%. This swap effectively converted $65.0 million of variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings from July 21, 2014 to July 21, 2021. As of December 31, 2017, this interest rate swap was valued as a liability of approximately $0.1 million.
In September 2016, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge against changes in future cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $40.0 million in variable-rate borrowings. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company receives from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on 1 month LIBOR and pays to the counterparty a fixed rate of 1.40%. This swap effectively converted $40.0 million of variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings from August 1, 2016 to July 1, 2023. As of December 31, 2017, this interest rate swap was valued as an asset of approximately $1.5 million.
Companies are required to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value on the balance sheet. The Company has designated these derivative instruments as cash flow hedges. As such, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivatives designated, and that qualify as cash flow hedges, is recorded as a component of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative instrument is recognized directly in interest expense. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company has not recorded any hedge ineffectiveness in earnings. Amounts in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $0.2 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.
The Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk (in thousands, except number of instruments):
Number of Instruments | Notional | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
Interest Rate Derivatives | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap | 5 | 5 | $ | 184,304 | $ | 185,044 |
The table below presents the estimated fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification in the consolidated balance sheets (in thousands).
F- 25 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
Asset Derivatives | ||||||||
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
Fair Value | Fair Value | |||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: | ||||||||
Interest Rate Swaps | $ | 1,592 | $ | 1,409 |
Liability Derivatives | ||||||||
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
Fair Value | Fair Value | |||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: | ||||||||
Interest Rate Swaps | $ | 242 | $ | 1,994 |
The table below presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments in the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands).
The Company does not use derivative instruments for trading or other speculative purposes and did not have any other derivative instruments or hedging activities as of December 31, 2017.
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with two of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where the Company could be declared in default on its derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due to the Company's default on the indebtedness.
As of December 31, 2017, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position related to these agreements, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, was $0.2 million. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has not posted any collateral related to these net liability positions. If the Company had breached any of these provisions as of December 31, 2017, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $0.2 million.
Although the derivative contracts are subject to master netting arrangements, which serve as credit mitigants to both us and our counterparties under certain situations, we do not net our derivative fair values or any existing rights or obligations to cash collateral on the consolidated balance sheets.
F- 26 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
The table below presents a gross presentation of the effects of offsetting and a net presentation of the Company’s derivatives as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The gross amounts of derivative assets or liabilities can be reconciled to the Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments above, which also provides the location that derivative assets and liabilities are presented on the consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):
Offsetting of Derivative Assets |
As of December 31, 2017 |
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the
Statement of Financial Position |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Amounts
of Recognized Assets |
Gross Amounts
Offset in the Statement of Financial Position |
Net Amounts of
Assets presented in the statement of Financial Position |
Financial
Instruments |
Cash Collateral
Received |
Net Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives | $ | 1,592 | $ | - | $ | 1,592 | $ | (42 | ) | $ | - | $ | 1,550 |
Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities |
As of December 31, 2017 |
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the
Statement of Financial Position |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Amounts
of Recognized Liabilities |
Gross Amounts
Offset in the Statement of Financial Position |
Net Amounts of
Liabilities presented in the statement of Financial Position |
Financial
Instruments |
Cash Collateral
Received |
Net Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives | $ | 242 | $ | - | $ | 242 | $ | (42 | ) | $ | - | $ | 200 |
Offsetting of Derivative Assets |
As of December 31, 2016 |
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the
Statement of Financial Position |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Amounts
of Recognized Assets |
Gross Amounts
Offset in the Statement of Financial Position |
Net Amounts of
Assets presented in the statement of Financial Position |
Financial
Instruments |
Cash Collateral
Received |
Net Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives | $ | 1,409 | $ | - | $ | 1,409 | $ | (50 | ) | $ | - | $ | 1,359 |
Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities |
As of December 31, 2016 |
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the
Statement of Financial Position |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Amounts
of Recognized Liabilities |
Gross Amounts
Offset in the Statement of Financial Position |
Net Amounts of
Liabilities presented in the statement of Financial Position |
Financial
Instruments |
Cash Collateral
Received |
Net Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives | $ | 1,994 | $ | - | $ | 1,994 | $ | (50 | ) | $ | - | $ | 1,944 |
Note 9 – Discontinued Operations
There were no properties classified as discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
F- 27 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
Note 10 – Fair Value Measurements
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
The Company accounts for fair values in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure (ASC 820). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 applies to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existing accounting pronouncements; accordingly, the standard does not require any new fair value measurements of reported balances.
ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls, is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Currently, the Company uses interest rate swap agreements to manage its interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves.
To comply with the provisions of ASC 820, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of December 31, 2017, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
F- 28 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
The table below presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Total Fair Value | Level 2 | |||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||
Derivative assets - interest rate swaps | $ | 1,592 | $ | 1,592 | ||||
Derivative liabilities - interest rate swaps | $ | 242 | $ | 242 | ||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||
Derivative assets - interest rate swaps | $ | 1,409 | $ | 1,409 | ||||
Derivative liabilities - interest rate swaps | $ | 1,994 | $ | 1,994 |
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable and accrued liabilities are reasonable estimates of their fair values because of the short maturity of these financial instruments.
The Company estimated the fair value of our debt based on our incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements with the same remaining maturity and on the discounted estimated future cash payments to be made for other debt. The discount rate used to calculate the fair value of debt approximates current lending rates for loans and assumes the debt is outstanding through maturity. Since such amounts are estimates that are based on limited available market information for similar transactions, which is a Level 2 non-recurring measurement, there can be no assurance that the disclosed value of any financial instrument could be realized by immediate settlement of the instrument.
Fixed rate debt (including variable rate debt swapped to fixed, excluding the value of the derivatives) with carrying values of $505.6 million and $386.9 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, had fair values of approximately $516.5 million and $401.4 million, respectively. Variable rate debt’s fair value is estimated to be equal to the carrying values of $14.0 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Note 11 – Equity Incentive Plan
In 2005, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”), which replaced a stock incentive plan established in 1994. The 2005 Plan authorized the issuance of a maximum of 1,000,000 shares of common stock.
In 2014, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which replaced the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. The 2014 Plan authorizes the issuance of a maximum of 700,000 shares of common stock.
No options were granted during 2017, 2016 or 2015.
Restricted common stock has been granted to certain employees under the 2014 Plan. As of December 31, 2017, there was $6.7 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to the outstanding restricted stock, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.5 years. The Company used 0% for both the discount factor and forfeiture rate for determining the fair value of restricted stock.
The holder of a restricted share award is generally entitled at all times on and after the date of issuance of the restricted shares to exercise the rights of a stockholder of the Company, including the right to vote the shares and the right to receive dividends on the shares. The Company granted 88,466, 93,363 and 85,597 shares of restricted stock in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively to employees and Directors. The restricted shares vest over a five-year period based on continued service to the Company.
F- 29 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
Restricted share activity is summarized as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Shares
Outstanding |
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value |
|||||||
Unvested restricted stock at December 31, 2014 | 239 | $ | 26.24 | |||||
Restricted stock granted | 86 | $ | 33.46 | |||||
Restricted stock vested | (80 | ) | $ | 25.13 | ||||
Restricted stock forfeited | (32 | ) | $ | 29.54 | ||||
Unvested restricted stock at December 31, 2015 | 213 | $ | 29.07 | |||||
Restricted stock granted | 93 | $ | 37.67 | |||||
Restricted stock vested | (72 | ) | $ | 27.07 | ||||
Restricted stock forfeited | (6 | ) | $ | 35.58 | ||||
Unvested restricted stock at December 31, 2016 | 228 | $ | 33.02 | |||||
Restricted stock granted | 88 | $ | 48.59 | |||||
Restricted stock vested | (78 | ) | $ | 30.95 | ||||
Restricted stock forfeited | (11 | ) | $ | 39.68 | ||||
Unvested restricted stock at December 31, 2017 | 227 | $ | 39.47 |
The intrinsic value of restricted shares redeemed was $1.1 millions, $0.7 million and $0.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Note 12 – Profit-Sharing Plan
The Company has a discretionary profit-sharing plan whereby it contributes to the plan such amounts as the Board of Directors of the Company determines. The participants in the plan cannot make any contributions to the plan. Contributions to the plan are allocated to the employees based on their percentage of compensation to the total compensation of all employees for the plan year. Participants in the plan become fully vested after six years of service. No contributions were made to the plan in 2017, 2016, or 2015.
Note 13 – Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following summary represents the unaudited results of operations of the Company, expressed in thousands except per share amounts, for the periods from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation of discontinued operations:
F- 30 |
Agree Realty Corporation | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
December 31, 2017 |
2017 | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | |||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 26,560 | $ | 28,080 | $ | 30,387 | $ | 33,375 | ||||||||
Net Income | $ | 14,768 | $ | 15,067 | $ | 12,283 | $ | 16,672 | ||||||||
Earnings per Share - diluted | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.55 |
2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | |||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 20,224 | $ | 21,844 | $ | 24,161 | $ | 25,299 | ||||||||
Net Income | $ | 7,586 | $ | 10,828 | $ | 14,476 | $ | 12,906 | ||||||||
Earnings per Share - diluted | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.61 | $ | 0.50 |
Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, we are party to various legal actions which we believe are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of our business. We believe that the outcome of the proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon our consolidated financial position or results of operations
Note 15 – Subsequent Events
In February 2018, the Company granted shares of restricted stock to employees under the 2014 Plan. The fair value of these grants was approximately $3.9 million. The grants were a mix of both Performance Shares and restricted shares that vest over a five-year period based on continued service to the Company.
There were no other reportable subsequent events or transactions as of February 22, 2018.
F- 31 |
Agree Realty Corporation | |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | December 31, 2017 |
COLUMN A | COLUMN B | COLUMN C | COLUMN D | COLUMN E | COLUMN F | COLUMN G | COLUMN H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life on Which
Depreciation in |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost | Costs Capitalized | Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period | Latest Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrance | Land |
Building
and
Improvements |
Subsequent
to
Acquisition |
Land |
Building
and
Improvements |
Total |
Accumulated
Depreciation |
Date of
Acquisition |
Statement is
Computed |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate Held for Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borman Center, MI | - | 550,000 | 562,404 | 1,087,596 | 550,000 | 1,650,000 | 2,200,000 | 1,650,000 | 1977 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital Plaza, KY | - | 7,379 | 2,240,607 | 3,510,131 | 7,379 | 5,750,738 | 5,758,117 | 3,318,488 | 1978 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grayling Plaza, MI | - | 200,000 | 1,778,657 | (46,867 | ) | 200,000 | 1,731,790 | 1,931,790 | 1,446,774 | 1984 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
West Frankfort Plaza, IL | - | 8,002 | 784,077 | 202,463 | 8,002 | 986,540 | 994,542 | 774,374 | 1982 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omaha Store, NE | - | 150,000 | - | - | 150,000 | - | 150,000 | - | 1995 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wichita Store, KS | 1,669,449 | 1,039,195 | 1,690,644 | (48,910 | ) | 1,139,677 | 1,541,252 | 2,680,929 | 875,350 | 1995 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monroeville, PA | - | 6,332,158 | 2,249,724 | (2,586,265 | ) | 3,153,890 | 2,841,727 | 5,995,617 | 1,153,029 | 1996 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boynton Beach, FL | - | 1,534,942 | 2,043,122 | 3,743,613 | 1,534,942 | 5,786,735 | 7,321,677 | 1,770,137 | 1996 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waterford, MI | - | 971,009 | 1,562,869 | 144,236 | 971,009 | 1,707,105 | 2,678,114 | 848,092 | 1997 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chesterfield Township, MI | - | 1,350,590 | 1,757,830 | (46,164 | ) | 1,350,590 | 1,711,666 | 3,062,256 | 835,019 | 1998 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Blanc, MI | - | 1,104,285 | 1,998,919 | 43,929 | 1,104,285 | 2,042,848 | 3,147,133 | 967,706 | 1998 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pontiac, MI | - | 1,144,190 | 1,808,955 | (113,506 | ) | 1,144,190 | 1,695,449 | 2,839,639 | 817,644 | 1998 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mt Pleasant Shopping Ctr, MI | - | 907,600 | 8,081,968 | 1,617,649 | 907,600 | 9,699,617 | 10,607,217 | 5,831,294 | 1998 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rochester, MI | 715,980 | 2,438,740 | 2,188,050 | 1,950 | 2,438,740 | 2,190,000 | 4,628,740 | 1,012,853 | 1999 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ypsilanti, MI | 646,668 | 2,050,000 | 2,222,097 | 32,641 | 2,050,000 | 2,254,738 | 4,304,738 | 1,013,770 | 1999 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Petoskey, MI | 449,809 | - | 2,332,473 | 1,179 | - | 2,333,652 | 2,333,652 | 1,030,607 | 2000 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flint, MI | 678,466 | 2,026,625 | 1,879,700 | (1,200 | ) | 2,026,625 | 1,878,500 | 3,905,125 | 798,371 | 2000 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flint, MI | 583,788 | 1,477,680 | 2,241,293 | - | 1,477,680 | 2,241,293 | 3,718,973 | 945,541 | 2001 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Baltimore, MI | 498,042 | 1,250,000 | 2,285,781 | (16,503 | ) | 1,250,000 | 2,269,278 | 3,519,278 | 929,161 | 2001 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flint, MI | 2,393,334 | 1,729,851 | 1,798,091 | 660 | 1,729,851 | 1,798,751 | 3,528,602 | 706,346 | 2002 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indianapolis, IN | - | 180,000 | 1,117,617 | 119,931 | 180,000 | 1,237,548 | 1,417,548 | 457,876 | 2002 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big Rapids, MI | - | 1,201,675 | 2,014,107 | (2,000 | ) | 1,201,675 | 2,012,107 | 3,213,782 | 742,007 | 2003 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flint, MI | - | - | 471,272 | (201,809 | ) | - | 269,463 | 269,463 | 166,120 | 2003 | 20 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canton Twp, MI | - | 1,550,000 | 2,132,096 | 23,021 | 1,550,000 | 2,155,117 | 3,705,117 | 758,728 | 2003 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flint, MI | 2,773,830 | 1,537,400 | 1,961,674 | - | 1,537,400 | 1,961,674 | 3,499,074 | 678,493 | 2004 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Webster, NY | - | 1,600,000 | 2,438,781 | - | 1,600,000 | 2,438,781 | 4,038,781 | 840,872 | 2004 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Albion, NY | - | 1,900,000 | 3,037,864 | - | 1,900,000 | 3,037,864 | 4,937,864 | 996,804 | 2004 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flint, MI | 2,120,635 | 1,029,000 | 2,165,463 | (6,666 | ) | 1,029,000 | 2,158,797 | 3,187,797 | 708,311 | 2004 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lansing, MI | - | 785,000 | 348,501 | 3,045 | 785,000 | 351,546 | 1,136,546 | 118,610 | 2004 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boynton Beach, FL | - | 1,569,000 | 2,363,524 | 3,911,082 | 1,569,000 | 6,274,606 | 7,843,606 | 857,122 | 2004 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midland, MI | - | 2,350,000 | 2,313,413 | (79,235 | ) | 2,268,695 | 2,315,483 | 4,584,178 | 721,102 | 2005 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Rapids, MI | - | 1,450,000 | 2,646,591 | - | 1,450,000 | 2,646,591 | 4,096,591 | 816,032 | 2005 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Delta Township, MI | - | 2,075,000 | 2,535,971 | 7,014 | 2,075,000 | 2,542,985 | 4,617,985 | 773,550 | 2005 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roseville, MI | - | 1,771,000 | 2,327,052 | 395 | 1,771,000 | 2,327,447 | 4,098,447 | 705,400 | 2005 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mt Pleasant, MI | 1,252,087 | 1,075,000 | 1,432,390 | 4,787 | 1,075,000 | 1,437,177 | 2,512,177 | 434,132 | 2005 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N Cape May, NJ | - | 1,075,000 | 1,430,092 | 495 | 1,075,000 | 1,430,587 | 2,505,587 | 432,152 | 2005 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summit Twp, MI | - | 998,460 | 1,336,357 | 12,686 | 998,460 | 1,349,043 | 2,347,503 | 379,333 | 2006 | 40 Years |
F- 32 |
Agree Realty Corporation | |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | December 31, 2017 |
COLUMN A | COLUMN B | COLUMN C | COLUMN D | COLUMN E | COLUMN F | COLUMN G | COLUMN H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life on Which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost | Costs Capitalized | Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period | Latest Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Building and | Subsequent to | Building and | Accumulated | Date of | Statement is | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrance | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation | Acquisition | Computed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Livonia, MI | - | 1,200,000 | 3,441,694 | 817,589 | 1,200,000 | 4,259,283 | 5,459,283 | 1,097,512 | 2007 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Barnesville, GA | - | 932,500 | 2,091,514 | 5,490 | 932,500 | 2,097,004 | 3,029,504 | 535,142 | 2007 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
East Lansing, MI | - | 240,000 | 54,531 | (38,420 | ) | 240,000 | 16,111 | 256,111 | 12,337 | 2007 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plainfield, IN | - | 2,708,415 | - | - | 2,708,415 | - | 2,708,415 | - | 2007 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Macomb Township, MI | - | 424,222 | - | - | 424,222 | - | 424,222 | - | 2008 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brighton, MI | - | 1,365,000 | 2,802,036 | 5,615 | 1,365,000 | 2,807,651 | 4,172,651 | 619,945 | 2009 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southfield, MI | 1,483,000 | 1,200,000 | 125,616 | 2,063 | 1,200,000 | 127,679 | 1,327,679 | 26,193 | 2009 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atchison, KS | - | 943,750 | 3,021,672 | - | 823,170 | 3,142,252 | 3,965,422 | 587,664 | 2010 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Johnstown, OH | 2,384,927 | 485,000 | 2,799,502 | - | 485,000 | 2,799,502 | 3,284,502 | 524,908 | 2010 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lake in the Hills, IL | - | 2,135,000 | 3,328,560 | - | 1,690,000 | 3,773,560 | 5,463,560 | 701,982 | 2010 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concord, NC | - | 7,676,305 | - | - | 7,676,305 | - | 7,676,305 | - | 2010 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Antioch, IL | 1,669,449 | 1,087,884 | - | - | 1,087,884 | - | 1,087,884 | - | 2010 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
St Augustine Shores, FL | - | 1,700,000 | 1,973,929 | (4,754 | ) | 1,700,000 | 1,969,175 | 3,669,175 | 350,619 | 2010 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mansfield, CT | 2,170,284 | 700,000 | 1,902,191 | 508 | 700,000 | 1,902,699 | 2,602,699 | 338,917 | 2010 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spring Grove, IL | 2,313,000 | 1,191,199 | - | 968 | 1,192,167 | - | 1,192,167 | - | 2010 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tallahassee, FL | 1,628,000 | - | 1,482,462 | - | - | 1,482,462 | 1,482,462 | 260,972 | 2010 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington, NC | 2,186,000 | 1,500,000 | 1,348,591 | - | 1,500,000 | 1,348,591 | 2,848,591 | 230,386 | 2011 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marietta, GA | 900,000 | 575,000 | 696,297 | 6,359 | 575,000 | 702,656 | 1,277,656 | 114,105 | 2011 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore, MD | 2,534,000 | 2,610,430 | - | (3,447 | ) | 2,606,983 | - | 2,606,983 | - | 2011 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas, TX | 1,844,000 | 701,320 | 778,905 | 1,042,730 | 701,320 | 1,821,635 | 2,522,955 | 281,357 | 2011 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chandler, AZ | 1,550,203 | 332,868 | 793,898 | 360 | 332,868 | 794,258 | 1,127,126 | 124,140 | 2011 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Lenox, IL | 1,192,464 | 1,422,488 | - | - | 1,422,488 | - | 1,422,488 | - | 2011 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roseville, CA | 4,752,000 | 2,800,000 | 3,695,455 | (96,364 | ) | 2,695,636 | 3,703,455 | 6,399,091 | 586,317 | 2011 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fort Walton Beach, FL | 1,768,000 | 542,200 | 1,958,790 | 82,553 | 542,200 | 2,041,343 | 2,583,543 | 304,107 | 2011 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leawood, KS | 2,963,352 | 989,622 | 3,003,541 | 16,197 | 989,622 | 3,019,738 | 4,009,360 | 452,958 | 2011 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salt Lake City, UT | 4,948,724 | - | 6,810,104 | (44,416 | ) | - | 6,765,688 | 6,765,688 | 1,050,325 | 2011 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Burton, MI | - | 80,000 | - | - | 80,000 | - | 80,000 | - | 2011 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Macomb Township, MI | 1,793,000 | 1,605,134 | - | - | 1,605,134 | - | 1,605,134 | - | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison, AL | 1,552,000 | 675,000 | 1,317,927 | - | 675,000 | 1,317,927 | 1,992,927 | 197,688 | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Walker, MI | 887,000 | 219,200 | 1,024,738 | - | 219,200 | 1,024,738 | 1,243,938 | 147,306 | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland, OR | - | 7,969,403 | - | 161 | 7,969,564 | - | 7,969,564 | - | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cochran, GA | - | 365,714 | 2,053,726 | - | 365,714 | 2,053,726 | 2,419,440 | 282,389 | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baton Rouge, LA | 1,073,217 | - | 1,188,322 | - | - | 1,188,322 | 1,188,322 | 165,870 | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southfield, MI | - | 1,178,215 | - | - | 1,178,215 | - | 1,178,215 | - | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clifton Heights, PA | - | 2,543,941 | 3,038,561 | (3,105 | ) | 2,543,941 | 3,035,456 | 5,579,397 | 414,216 | 2012 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Newark, DE | - | 2,117,547 | 4,777,516 | (4,881 | ) | 2,117,547 | 4,772,635 | 6,890,182 | 651,329 | 2012 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vineland, NJ | - | 4,102,710 | 1,501,854 | 7,986 | 4,102,710 | 1,509,840 | 5,612,550 | 206,034 | 2012 | 40 Years |
F- 33 |
Agree Realty Corporation | |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | December 31, 2017 |
COLUMN A | COLUMN B | COLUMN C | COLUMN D | COLUMN E | COLUMN F | COLUMN G | COLUMN H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life on Which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost | Costs Capitalized | Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period | Latest Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Building and | Subsequent to | Building and | Accumulated | Date of | Statement is | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrance | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation | Acquisition | Computed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fort Mill, SC | - | 750,000 | 1,187,380 | - | 750,000 | 1,187,380 | 1,937,380 | 160,790 | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spartanburg, SC | - | 250,000 | 765,714 | 4,387 | 250,000 | 770,101 | 1,020,101 | 103,114 | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Springfield, IL | - | 302,520 | 653,654 | 10,255 | 302,520 | 663,909 | 966,429 | 88,027 | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville, NC | - | 676,930 | 1,482,748 | - | 676,930 | 1,482,748 | 2,159,678 | 197,699 | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Morrow, GA | - | 525,000 | 1,383,489 | (99,849 | ) | 525,000 | 1,283,640 | 1,808,640 | 169,103 | 2012 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte, NC | - | 1,822,900 | 3,531,275 | (572,344 | ) | 1,822,900 | 2,958,931 | 4,781,831 | 384,578 | 2012 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lyons, GA | - | 121,627 | 2,155,635 | (103,392 | ) | 121,627 | 2,052,243 | 2,173,870 | 262,352 | 2012 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fuquay-Varina, NC | - | 2,042,225 | 1,763,768 | (255,778 | ) | 2,042,225 | 1,507,990 | 3,550,215 | 192,173 | 2012 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minneapolis, MN | - | 1,088,015 | 345,958 | (54,430 | ) | 826,635 | 552,908 | 1,379,543 | 69,836 | 2012 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lake Zurich, IL | - | 780,974 | 7,909,277 | 28,174 | 780,974 | 7,937,451 | 8,718,425 | 1,000,420 | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lebanon, VA | - | 300,000 | 612,582 | 20,380 | 300,000 | 632,962 | 932,962 | 84,862 | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Harlingen, TX | - | 430,000 | 1,614,378 | 12,854 | 430,000 | 1,627,232 | 2,057,232 | 203,402 | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wichita, TX | - | 340,000 | 1,530,971 | 12,855 | 340,000 | 1,543,826 | 1,883,826 | 192,979 | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pensacola, FL | - | 650,000 | 1,165,415 | 12,854 | 650,000 | 1,178,269 | 1,828,269 | 147,282 | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pensacola, FL | - | 400,000 | 1,507,583 | 12,854 | 400,000 | 1,520,437 | 1,920,437 | 190,056 | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Venice, FL | - | 1,300,196 | - | 4,892 | 1,305,088 | - | 1,305,088 | - | 2012 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
St. Joseph, MO | - | 377,620 | 7,639,521 | - | 377,620 | 7,639,521 | 8,017,141 | 939,024 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statham, GA | - | 191,919 | 3,851,073 | - | 191,919 | 3,851,073 | 4,042,992 | 473,359 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North Las Vegas, NV | - | 214,552 | 717,435 | - | 214,552 | 717,435 | 931,987 | 87,437 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Memphis, TN | - | 322,520 | 748,890 | - | 322,520 | 748,890 | 1,071,410 | 90,494 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rancho Cordova, CA | - | 1,339,612 | - | - | 1,339,612 | - | 1,339,612 | - | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kissimmee, FL | - | 1,453,500 | 971,683 | - | 1,453,500 | 971,683 | 2,425,183 | 115,388 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinellas Park, FL | - | 2,625,000 | 874,542 | 4,163 | 2,625,000 | 878,705 | 3,503,705 | 100,611 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Manchester, CT | - | 397,800 | 325,705 | - | 397,800 | 325,705 | 723,505 | 38,000 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rapid City, SD | - | 1,017,800 | 2,348,032 | - | 1,017,800 | 2,348,032 | 3,365,832 | 271,490 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL | - | 272,222 | 649,063 | 2,451 | 272,222 | 651,514 | 923,736 | 74,558 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brooklyn, OH | - | 3,643,700 | 15,079,714 | 14,207 | 3,643,700 | 15,093,921 | 18,737,621 | 1,696,705 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madisonville, TX | - | 96,680 | 1,087,642 | 9,600 | 96,680 | 1,097,242 | 1,193,922 | 122,361 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baton Rouge, LA | - | 271,400 | 1,086,434 | - | 271,400 | 1,086,434 | 1,357,834 | 119,959 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forest, MS | - | - | 1,298,176 | 21,925 | - | 1,320,101 | 1,320,101 | 144,072 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sun Valley, NV | - | 308,495 | 1,373,336 | (51,008 | ) | 253,495 | 1,377,328 | 1,630,823 | 149,140 | 2013 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rochester, NY | - | 2,500,000 | 7,398,639 | 2,017 | 2,500,000 | 7,400,656 | 9,900,656 | 793,912 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allentown, PA | - | 2,525,051 | 7,896,613 | - | 2,525,051 | 7,896,613 | 10,421,664 | 847,241 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Casselberry, FL | - | 1,804,000 | 793,101 | - | 1,804,000 | 793,101 | 2,597,101 | 87,572 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Berwyn, IL | - | 186,791 | 933,959 | 5,400 | 186,791 | 939,359 | 1,126,150 | 95,882 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Forks, ND | - | 1,502,609 | 2,301,337 | 1,801,028 | 1,502,609 | 4,102,365 | 5,604,974 | 419,826 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Arbor, MI | 7,089,196 | 3,000,000 | 4,595,757 | 277,040 | 3,000,000 | 4,872,797 | 7,872,797 | 496,807 | 2013 | 40 Years |
F- 34 |
Agree Realty Corporation | |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | December 31, 2017 |
COLUMN A | COLUMN B | COLUMN C | COLUMN D | COLUMN E | COLUMN F | COLUMN G | COLUMN H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life on Which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost | Costs Capitalized | Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period | Latest Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Building and | Subsequent to | Building and | Accumulated | Date of | Statement is | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrance | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation | Acquisition | Computed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joplin, MO | - | 1,208,225 | 1,160,843 | - | 1,208,225 | 1,160,843 | 2,369,068 | 120,920 | 2013 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Red Bay, AL | - | 38,981 | 2,528,437 | 3,856 | 38,981 | 2,532,293 | 2,571,274 | 200,459 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Birmingham, AL | - | 230,106 | 231,313 | (297 | ) | 230,106 | 231,016 | 461,122 | 17,808 | 2014 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Birmingham, AL | - | 245,234 | 251,339 | (324 | ) | 245,234 | 251,015 | 496,249 | 19,350 | 2014 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Birmingham, AL | - | 98,271 | 179,824 | - | 98,271 | 179,824 | 278,095 | 13,862 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Birmingham, AL | - | 235,641 | 127,477 | (313 | ) | 235,641 | 127,164 | 362,805 | 9,804 | 2014 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Montgomery, AL | - | 325,389 | 217,850 | - | 325,389 | 217,850 | 543,239 | 16,793 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Littleton, CO | 5,130,974 | 819,000 | 8,756,266 | 399 | 819,000 | 8,756,665 | 9,575,665 | 711,475 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
St Petersburg, FL | - | 1,225,000 | 1,025,247 | 6,592 | 1,225,000 | 1,031,839 | 2,256,839 | 96,457 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
St Augustine, FL | - | 200,000 | 1,523,230 | - | 200,000 | 1,523,230 | 1,723,230 | 123,762 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
East Palatka, FL | - | 730,000 | 575,236 | 6,911 | 730,000 | 582,147 | 1,312,147 | 47,258 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pensacola, FL | - | 136,365 | 398,773 | - | 136,365 | 398,773 | 535,138 | 30,739 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville, FL | - | 299,312 | 348,862 | 12,497 | 299,312 | 361,359 | 660,671 | 27,073 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fort Oglethorpe, GA | - | 1,842,240 | 2,844,126 | 7,307 | 1,842,240 | 2,851,433 | 4,693,673 | 279,183 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Lenox, IL | - | 2,010,000 | 6,206,252 | 107,873 | 2,010,000 | 6,314,125 | 8,324,125 | 502,341 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rockford, IL | - | 303,395 | 2,436,873 | - | 303,395 | 2,436,873 | 2,740,268 | 197,996 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indianapolis, IN | - | 575,000 | 1,871,110 | - | 575,000 | 1,871,110 | 2,446,110 | 175,416 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Terre Haute, IN | - | 103,147 | 2,477,263 | 32,376 | 103,147 | 2,509,639 | 2,612,786 | 186,763 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Junction City, KS | - | 78,271 | 2,504,294 | 10,831 | 78,271 | 2,515,125 | 2,593,396 | 188,634 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baton Rouge, LA | - | 226,919 | 347,691 | - | 226,919 | 347,691 | 574,610 | 26,801 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lincoln Park, MI | - | 543,303 | 1,408,544 | - | 543,303 | 1,408,544 | 1,951,847 | 132,050 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Novi, MI | - | 1,803,857 | 1,488,505 | 22,490 | 1,803,857 | 1,510,995 | 3,314,852 | 113,290 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bloomfield Hills, MI | - | 1,340,000 | 2,003,406 | 364,266 | 1,341,900 | 2,365,772 | 3,707,672 | 183,907 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Moorehead, MN | - | 511,645 | 870,732 | 8,369 | 511,645 | 879,101 | 1,390,746 | 69,547 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Park Rapids, MN | - | 413,151 | 706,884 | 5,925 | 413,151 | 712,809 | 1,125,960 | 56,396 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jackson, MS | - | 256,789 | 172,184 | - | 256,789 | 172,184 | 428,973 | 13,273 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Belton, MO | - | 714,775 | 7,173,999 | - | 714,775 | 7,173,999 | 7,888,774 | 538,049 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Great Falls, MT | - | 945,765 | 753,222 | 12,712 | 945,765 | 765,934 | 1,711,699 | 57,435 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Irvington, NJ | - | 315,000 | 1,313,025 | - | 315,000 | 1,313,025 | 1,628,025 | 123,094 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fargo, ND | - | 629,484 | 707,799 | 505,065 | 629,484 | 1,212,864 | 1,842,348 | 95,952 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jamestown, ND | - | 234,545 | 1,158,486 | 8,499 | 234,545 | 1,166,985 | 1,401,530 | 92,337 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Forks, ND | - | 540,658 | 813,776 | 7,714 | 540,658 | 821,490 | 1,362,148 | 64,990 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Toledo, OH | - | 500,000 | 1,372,363 | (12 | ) | 500,000 | 1,372,351 | 1,872,351 | 128,657 | 2014 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Toledo, OH | - | 155,250 | 762,500 | 72 | 155,250 | 762,572 | 917,822 | 65,131 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Toledo, OH | - | 213,750 | 754,675 | - | 213,750 | 754,675 | 968,425 | 64,462 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Toledo, OH | - | 168,750 | 785,000 | 16,477 | 168,750 | 801,477 | 970,227 | 68,289 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Port Clinton, OH | - | 75,000 | 721,100 | - | 75,000 | 721,100 | 796,100 | 61,595 | 2014 | 40 Years |
F- 35 |
Agree Realty Corporation | |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | December 31, 2017 |
COLUMN A | COLUMN B | COLUMN C | COLUMN D | COLUMN E | COLUMN F | COLUMN G | COLUMN H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life on Which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost | Costs Capitalized | Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period | Latest Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Building and | Subsequent to | Building and | Accumulated | Date of | Statement is | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrance | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation | Acquisition | Computed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mansfield, OH | - | 306,000 | 725,600 | - | 306,000 | 725,600 | 1,031,600 | 61,978 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orville, OH | - | 344,250 | 716,600 | - | 344,250 | 716,600 | 1,060,850 | 61,209 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Akron, OH | - | 427,750 | 715,700 | - | 427,750 | 715,700 | 1,143,450 | 61,133 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Akron, OH | - | 696,000 | 845,000 | - | 696,000 | 845,000 | 1,541,000 | 72,177 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hubbard, OH | - | 204,000 | 726,500 | - | 204,000 | 726,500 | 930,500 | 62,056 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Youngstown, OH | - | 285,000 | 745,700 | - | 285,000 | 745,700 | 1,030,700 | 63,696 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Calcutta, OH | - | 208,050 | 758,750 | 1,462 | 208,050 | 760,212 | 968,262 | 64,852 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus, OH | - | - | 1,136,250 | 2,795 | - | 1,139,045 | 1,139,045 | 94,688 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tulsa, OK | - | 459,148 | 640,550 | (16,477 | ) | 459,148 | 624,073 | 1,083,221 | 60,150 | 2014 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ligonier, PA | - | 330,000 | 5,021,849 | (9,500 | ) | 330,000 | 5,012,349 | 5,342,349 | 428,699 | 2014 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clarion, PA | - | 121,200 | 771,500 | - | 121,200 | 771,500 | 892,700 | 65,900 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mercer, PA | - | 121,200 | 770,000 | - | 121,200 | 770,000 | 891,200 | 65,772 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Limerick, PA | - | 369,000 | - | - | 369,000 | - | 369,000 | - | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Harrisburg, PA | - | 124,757 | 1,446,773 | 11,175 | 124,757 | 1,457,948 | 1,582,705 | 109,264 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anderson, SC | - | 781,200 | 4,441,535 | - | 781,200 | 4,441,535 | 5,222,735 | 434,901 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Easley, SC | - | 332,275 | 268,612 | - | 332,275 | 268,612 | 600,887 | 20,706 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spartanburg, SC | - | 141,307 | 446,706 | - | 141,307 | 446,706 | 588,013 | 34,434 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spartanburg, SC | - | 94,770 | 261,640 | - | 94,770 | 261,640 | 356,410 | 20,168 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia, SC | - | 303,932 | 1,221,964 | (13,830 | ) | 303,932 | 1,208,134 | 1,512,066 | 93,724 | 2014 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alcoa, TN | - | 329,074 | 270,719 | - | 329,074 | 270,719 | 599,793 | 20,868 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Knoxville, TN | - | 214,077 | 286,037 | - | 214,077 | 286,037 | 500,114 | 22,049 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Red Bank, TN | - | 229,100 | 302,146 | - | 229,100 | 302,146 | 531,246 | 23,290 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Tazewell, TN | - | 91,006 | 328,561 | 5,074 | 91,006 | 333,635 | 424,641 | 25,015 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maryville, TN | - | 94,682 | 1,529,621 | 27,243 | 94,682 | 1,556,864 | 1,651,546 | 116,399 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Morristown, TN | - | 46,404 | 801,506 | 4,990 | 46,404 | 806,496 | 852,900 | 60,479 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clinton, TN | - | 69,625 | 1,177,927 | 11,564 | 69,625 | 1,189,491 | 1,259,116 | 89,200 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Knoxville, TN | - | 160,057 | 2,265,025 | 12,927 | 160,057 | 2,277,952 | 2,438,009 | 170,824 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sweetwater, TN | - | 79,100 | 1,009,290 | 6,740 | 79,100 | 1,016,030 | 1,095,130 | 76,190 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
McKinney, TX | - | 2,671,020 | 6,785,815 | 331 | 2,671,020 | 6,786,146 | 9,457,166 | 593,759 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forest Va | - | 282,600 | 956,027 | - | 282,600 | 956,027 | 1,238,627 | 83,651 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colonial Heights, VA | - | 547,692 | 1,059,557 | (5,963 | ) | 547,692 | 1,053,594 | 1,601,286 | 81,218 | 2014 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chester, VA | - | 300,583 | 794,417 | (3,777 | ) | 300,583 | 790,640 | 1,091,223 | 60,947 | 2014 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midlothian, VA | - | 232,337 | 802,602 | (3,839 | ) | 232,337 | 798,763 | 1,031,100 | 61,573 | 2014 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ashland, VA | - | 426,396 | 965,925 | (5,050 | ) | 426,396 | 960,875 | 1,387,271 | 74,070 | 2014 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mecanicsville, VA | - | 219,496 | 906,590 | (4,225 | ) | 219,496 | 902,365 | 1,121,861 | 69,560 | 2014 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Glen Allen, VA | - | 590,101 | 1,129,495 | (6,867 | ) | 590,101 | 1,122,628 | 1,712,729 | 86,540 | 2014 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Burlington, WA | - | 610,000 | 3,647,279 | (4,602 | ) | 610,000 | 3,642,677 | 4,252,677 | 282,178 | 2014 | 40 Years |
F- 36 |
Agree Realty Corporation | |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | December 31, 2017 |
COLUMN A | COLUMN B | COLUMN C | COLUMN D | COLUMN E | COLUMN F | COLUMN G | COLUMN H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life on Which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost | Costs Capitalized | Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period | Latest Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Building and | Subsequent to | Building and | Accumulated | Date of | Statement is | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrance | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation | Acquisition | Computed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wausau, WI | - | 909,092 | 1,405,899 | - | 909,092 | 1,405,899 | 2,314,991 | 123,015 | 2014 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foley AL | - | 305,332 | 506,203 | - | 305,332 | 506,203 | 811,535 | 38,893 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sulligent, AL | - | 58,803 | 1,085,906 | - | 58,803 | 1,085,906 | 1,144,709 | 76,853 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eutaw, AL | - | 103,746 | 1,212,006 | 2,935 | 103,746 | 1,214,941 | 1,318,687 | 85,982 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tallassee, AL | - | 154,437 | 850,448 | 11,125 | 154,437 | 861,573 | 1,016,010 | 56,758 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange Park, AL | - | 649,652 | 1,775,000 | - | 649,652 | 1,775,000 | 2,424,652 | 103,542 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aurora, CO | - | 976,865 | 1,999,651 | 1,743 | 976,865 | 2,001,394 | 2,978,259 | 104,236 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pace, FL | - | 37,860 | 524,400 | - | 37,860 | 524,400 | 562,260 | 38,137 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pensacola, FL | - | 309,607 | 775,084 | (25 | ) | 309,607 | 775,059 | 1,084,666 | 56,326 | 2015 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville Beach, FL | - | 623,031 | 370,612 | - | 623,031 | 370,612 | 993,643 | 25,436 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Freeport, FL | - | 312,615 | 1,277,386 | - | 312,615 | 1,277,386 | 1,590,001 | 79,837 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Glenwood, GA | - | 29,489 | 1,027,370 | - | 29,489 | 1,027,370 | 1,056,859 | 70,586 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Albany, GA | - | 47,955 | 641,123 | - | 47,955 | 641,123 | 689,078 | 43,997 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Belvidere, IL | - | 184,136 | 644,492 | - | 184,136 | 644,492 | 828,628 | 44,196 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Springfield, IL | - | 680,045 | 2,870,606 | - | 680,045 | 2,870,606 | 3,550,651 | 191,373 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru, IL | - | 380,254 | 2,125,498 | - | 380,254 | 2,125,498 | 2,505,752 | 119,559 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davenport, IA | - | 776,366 | 6,623,542 | - | 776,366 | 6,623,542 | 7,399,908 | 413,971 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Le Mars, IA | - | 53,198 | 613,534 | (300,000 | ) | 53,198 | 313,534 | 366,732 | 38,346 | 2015 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buffalo Center, IA | - | 159,353 | 700,460 | - | 159,353 | 700,460 | 859,813 | 42,319 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sheffield, IA | - | 131,794 | 729,543 | - | 131,794 | 729,543 | 861,337 | 44,077 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Topeka, KS | - | 1,853,601 | 12,427,839 | 12,465 | 1,853,601 | 12,440,304 | 14,293,905 | 880,135 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lenexa, KS | - | 303,175 | 2,186,864 | - | 303,175 | 2,186,864 | 2,490,039 | 109,343 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tompkinsville , KY | - | 70,252 | 1,132,033 | - | 70,252 | 1,132,033 | 1,202,285 | 80,116 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hazard, KY | - | 8,392,841 | 13,731,648 | (16,857 | ) | 8,375,591 | 13,732,041 | 22,107,632 | 686,597 | 2015 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DeQuincy, LA | - | 114,407 | 1,881,056 | 4,725 | 114,407 | 1,885,781 | 2,000,188 | 133,295 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland, MA | - | - | 3,831,860 | 3,172 | - | 3,835,032 | 3,835,032 | 239,650 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flint, MI | - | 120,078 | 2,561,015 | 20,490 | 120,078 | 2,581,505 | 2,701,583 | 129,075 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hutchinson, MN | - | 67,914 | 720,799 | - | 67,914 | 720,799 | 788,713 | 43,548 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lowry City, MO | - | 103,202 | 614,065 | - | 103,202 | 614,065 | 717,267 | 38,379 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Branson, MO | - | 564,066 | 940,585 | 175 | 564,066 | 940,760 | 1,504,826 | 50,957 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Branson, MO | - | 721,135 | 717,081 | 940 | 721,135 | 718,021 | 1,439,156 | 38,884 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enfield, NH | - | 93,628 | 1,295,320 | 48,989 | 93,628 | 1,344,309 | 1,437,937 | 94,417 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marietta, OH | - | 319,157 | 1,225,026 | - | 319,157 | 1,225,026 | 1,544,183 | 84,162 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lorain, OH | - | 293,831 | 1,044,956 | - | 293,831 | 1,044,956 | 1,338,787 | 69,664 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Franklin, OH | - | 264,153 | 1,191,777 | - | 264,153 | 1,191,777 | 1,455,930 | 76,969 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elyria, OH | - | 82,023 | 910,404 | - | 82,023 | 910,404 | 992,427 | 56,900 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elyria, OH | - | 126,641 | 695,072 | - | 126,641 | 695,072 | 821,713 | 43,442 | 2015 | 40 Years |
F- 37 |
Agree Realty Corporation | |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | December 31, 2017 |
COLUMN A | COLUMN B | COLUMN C | COLUMN D | COLUMN E | COLUMN F | COLUMN G | COLUMN H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life on Which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost | Costs Capitalized | Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period | Latest Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Building and | Subsequent to | Building and | Accumulated | Date of | Statement is | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrance | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation | Acquisition | Computed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bedford Heights, OH | - | 226,920 | 959,528 | - | 226,920 | 959,528 | 1,186,448 | 57,972 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Newburgh Heights, OH | - | 224,040 | 959,099 | - | 224,040 | 959,099 | 1,183,139 | 57,946 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warrensville Heights, OH | - | 186,209 | 920,496 | 4,900 | 186,209 | 925,396 | 1,111,605 | 56,144 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heath, OH | - | 325,381 | 757,994 | 135 | 325,381 | 758,129 | 1,083,510 | 41,065 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lima, OH | - | 335,386 | 592,154 | - | 335,386 | 592,154 | 927,540 | 29,608 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elk City, OK | - | 45,212 | 1,242,220 | - | 45,212 | 1,242,220 | 1,287,432 | 80,226 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salem, OR | - | 1,450,000 | 2,951,167 | 1,346,640 | 1,450,000 | 4,297,807 | 5,747,807 | 214,887 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Westfield, PA | - | 47,346 | 1,117,723 | - | 47,346 | 1,117,723 | 1,165,069 | 81,400 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bloomsburg, PA | - | 152,645 | 1,091,115 | - | 152,645 | 1,091,115 | 1,243,760 | 70,468 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Altoona, PA | - | 555,903 | 9,489,791 | 1,017 | 555,903 | 9,490,808 | 10,046,711 | 533,843 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grindstone, PA | - | 288,246 | 500,379 | - | 288,246 | 500,379 | 788,625 | 25,019 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blythewood, SC | - | 475,393 | 878,586 | - | 475,393 | 878,586 | 1,353,979 | 61,245 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia, SC | - | 249,900 | 809,935 | - | 249,900 | 809,935 | 1,059,835 | 55,583 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liberty, SC | - | 27,929 | 1,222,856 | 90 | 27,929 | 1,222,946 | 1,250,875 | 83,989 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blacksburg, SC | - | 27,547 | 1,468,101 | - | 27,547 | 1,468,101 | 1,495,648 | 97,874 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Easley, SC | - | 51,325 | 1,187,506 | - | 51,325 | 1,187,506 | 1,238,831 | 76,693 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fountain Inn, SC | - | 107,633 | 1,076,633 | - | 107,633 | 1,076,633 | 1,184,266 | 69,533 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Walterboro, SC | - | 21,414 | 1,156,820 | - | 21,414 | 1,156,820 | 1,178,234 | 74,711 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jackson, TN | - | 277,000 | 495,103 | - | 277,000 | 495,103 | 772,103 | 24,755 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arlington, TX | - | 494,755 | 710,416 | - | 494,755 | 710,416 | 1,205,171 | 51,508 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sweetwater, TX | - | 626,578 | 652,127 | - | 626,578 | 652,127 | 1,278,705 | 47,551 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fort Worth, TX | - | 2,999,944 | 6,198,198 | - | 2,999,944 | 6,198,198 | 9,198,142 | 413,214 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brenham, TX | - | 355,486 | 17,280,895 | 581 | 355,486 | 17,281,476 | 17,636,962 | 1,152,060 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corpus Christi, TX | - | 316,916 | 2,140,056 | - | 316,916 | 2,140,056 | 2,456,972 | 124,837 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Harlingen, TX | - | 126,102 | 869,779 | - | 126,102 | 869,779 | 995,881 | 50,737 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midland, TX | - | 194,174 | 5,005,720 | 2,000 | 194,174 | 5,007,720 | 5,201,894 | 281,659 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rockwall, TX | - | 578,225 | 1,768,930 | 210 | 578,225 | 1,769,140 | 2,347,365 | 88,452 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bluefield, VA | - | 88,431 | 1,161,840 | - | 88,431 | 1,161,840 | 1,250,271 | 79,832 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Princeton, WV | - | 111,653 | 1,029,090 | - | 111,653 | 1,029,090 | 1,140,743 | 70,688 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beckley, WV | - | 162,024 | 991,653 | - | 162,024 | 991,653 | 1,153,677 | 68,126 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martinsburg, WV | - | 620,892 | 943,163 | - | 620,892 | 943,163 | 1,564,055 | 47,158 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Chute, WI | - | 2,766,417 | 7,084,942 | 4,700 | 2,766,417 | 7,089,642 | 9,856,059 | 486,949 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Richmond, WI | - | 71,969 | 648,850 | - | 71,969 | 648,850 | 720,819 | 40,553 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ashland, WI | - | 142,287 | 684,545 | - | 142,287 | 684,545 | 826,832 | 41,358 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baraboo, WI | - | 142,563 | 653,176 | - | 142,563 | 653,176 | 795,739 | 39,463 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mauston, WI | - | 289,882 | 3,302,490 | - | 289,882 | 3,302,490 | 3,592,372 | 178,885 | 2015 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decatur, AL | - | 337,738 | 510,706 | - | 337,738 | 510,706 | 848,444 | 14,896 | 2016 | 40 Years |
F- 38 |
Agree Realty Corporation | |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | December 31, 2017 |
COLUMN A | COLUMN B | COLUMN C | COLUMN D | COLUMN E | COLUMN F | COLUMN G | COLUMN H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life on Which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost | Costs Capitalized | Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period | Latest Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Building and | Subsequent to | Building and | Accumulated | Date of | Statement is | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrance | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation | Acquisition | Computed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greenville, AL | - | 203,722 | 905,780 | 9,911 | 203,722 | 915,691 | 1,119,413 | 22,849 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bullhead City, AZ | - | 177,500 | 1,364,406 | - | 177,500 | 1,364,406 | 1,541,906 | 59,678 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Page, AZ | - | 256,982 | 1,299,283 | - | 256,982 | 1,299,283 | 1,556,265 | 56,844 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Safford, AZ | - | 349,269 | 1,196,307 | - | 349,269 | 1,196,307 | 1,545,576 | 42,239 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tuscon, AZ | - | 3,208,580 | 4,410,679 | - | 3,208,580 | 4,410,679 | 7,619,259 | 165,400 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bentonville, AR | - | 610,926 | 897,562 | 170 | 610,926 | 897,732 | 1,508,658 | 39,305 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sunnyvale, CA | - | 7,351,903 | 4,638,432 | 735 | 7,351,903 | 4,639,167 | 11,991,070 | 183,437 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upland, CA | - | 4,413,871 | 8,318,559 | - | 4,413,871 | 8,318,559 | 12,732,430 | 329,276 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Whittier, CA | - | 4,237,918 | 7,343,869 | - | 4,237,918 | 7,343,869 | 11,581,787 | 290,695 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aurora, CO | - | 847,349 | 834,301 | - | 847,349 | 834,301 | 1,681,650 | 20,858 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aurora, CO | - | 1,132,676 | 5,716,367 | 32,402 | 1,132,676 | 5,748,769 | 6,881,445 | 143,582 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evergreen, CO | - | 1,998,860 | 3,827,245 | - | 1,998,860 | 3,827,245 | 5,826,105 | 151,495 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apopka, FL | - | 1,996,995 | 3,456,839 | 14,303 | 1,996,995 | 3,471,142 | 5,468,137 | 136,863 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lakeland, FL | - | 61,000 | 1,227,037 | - | 61,000 | 1,227,037 | 1,288,037 | 35,789 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mt Dora, FL | - | 1,678,671 | 3,691,615 | - | 1,678,671 | 3,691,615 | 5,370,286 | 146,126 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North Miami Beach, FL | - | 1,622,742 | 512,717 | 10,328 | 1,622,742 | 523,045 | 2,145,787 | 13,022 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando, FL | - | 903,411 | 1,627,159 | (24,843 | ) | 903,411 | 1,602,316 | 2,505,727 | 53,319 | 2016 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Port Orange, FL | - | 1,493,863 | 3,114,697 | - | 1,493,863 | 3,114,697 | 4,608,560 | 123,290 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royal Palm Beach, FL | - | 2,052,463 | 956,768 | - | 2,052,463 | 956,768 | 3,009,231 | 33,886 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sarasota, FL | - | 1,769,175 | 3,587,992 | 22,885 | 1,769,175 | 3,610,877 | 5,380,052 | 142,025 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Venice, FL | - | 281,936 | 1,291,748 | - | 281,936 | 1,291,748 | 1,573,684 | 42,966 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vero Beach, FL | - | 4,469,033 | - | - | 4,469,033 | - | 4,469,033 | - | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dalton, GA | - | 211,362 | 220,927 | - | 211,362 | 220,927 | 432,289 | 8,263 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crystal Lake, IL | - | 2,446,521 | 7,012,819 | 120 | 2,446,521 | 7,012,939 | 9,459,460 | 189,933 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Glenwood, IL | - | 815,483 | 970,108 | - | 815,483 | 970,108 | 1,785,591 | 28,295 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Morris, IL | - | 1,206,749 | 2,062,495 | - | 1,206,749 | 2,062,495 | 3,269,244 | 81,640 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wheaton, IL | - | 447,291 | 751,458 | - | 447,291 | 751,458 | 1,198,749 | 31,311 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bicknell, IN | - | 215,037 | 2,381,471 | - | 215,037 | 2,381,471 | 2,596,508 | 79,278 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fort Wayne, IN | - | 711,430 | 1,258,357 | - | 711,430 | 1,258,357 | 1,969,787 | 60,296 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indianapolis, IN | - | 734,434 | 970,175 | - | 734,434 | 970,175 | 1,704,609 | 42,443 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Des Moines, IA | - | 322,797 | 1,374,153 | - | 322,797 | 1,374,153 | 1,696,950 | 54,394 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frankfort, KY | - | - | 514,277 | - | - | 514,277 | 514,277 | 17,699 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DeRidder, LA | - | 814,891 | 2,156,542 | 480 | 814,891 | 2,157,022 | 2,971,913 | 80,904 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lake Charles, LA | - | 1,308,418 | 4,235,719 | 5,761 | 1,308,418 | 4,241,480 | 5,549,898 | 114,753 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shreveport, LA | - | 891,872 | 2,058,257 | - | 891,872 | 2,058,257 | 2,950,129 | 77,194 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marshall, MI | - | 339,813 | - | - | 339,813 | - | 339,813 | - | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mt Pleasant, MI | - | - | 511,282 | (254 | ) | - | 511,028 | 511,028 | 12,777 | 2016 | 40 Years |
F- 39 |
Agree Realty Corporation | |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | December 31, 2017 |
COLUMN A | COLUMN B | COLUMN C | COLUMN D | COLUMN E | COLUMN F | COLUMN G | COLUMN H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life on Which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost | Costs Capitalized | Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period | Latest Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Building and | Subsequent to | Building and | Accumulated | Date of | Statement is | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrance | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation | Acquisition | Computed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norton Shores, MI | - | 495,605 | 667,982 | 7,274 | 495,605 | 675,256 | 1,170,861 | 18,243 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portage, MI | - | 262,181 | 1,102,990 | - | 262,181 | 1,102,990 | 1,365,171 | 39,064 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephenson, MI | - | 223,152 | 1,044,947 | 270 | 223,152 | 1,045,217 | 1,268,369 | 26,128 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sterling, MI | - | 127,844 | 905,607 | 25,464 | 127,844 | 931,071 | 1,058,915 | 26,949 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cambridge, MN | - | 536,812 | 1,334,601 | - | 536,812 | 1,334,601 | 1,871,413 | 52,828 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eagle Bend, MN | - | 96,558 | 1,165,437 | - | 96,558 | 1,165,437 | 1,261,995 | 36,360 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brandon, MS | - | 428,464 | 969,346 | - | 428,464 | 969,346 | 1,397,810 | 40,389 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clinton, MS | - | 370,264 | 1,057,143 | - | 370,264 | 1,057,143 | 1,427,407 | 44,048 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus, MS | - | 1,103,458 | 2,128,089 | - | 1,103,458 | 2,128,089 | 3,231,547 | 97,537 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flowood, MS | - | 360,267 | 1,044,807 | - | 360,267 | 1,044,807 | 1,405,074 | 43,534 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Holly Springs, MS | - | 413,316 | 952,574 | - | 413,316 | 952,574 | 1,365,890 | 35,600 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jackson, MS | - | 242,796 | 963,188 | - | 242,796 | 963,188 | 1,205,984 | 40,133 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jackson, MS | - | 732,944 | 2,862,813 | - | 732,944 | 2,862,813 | 3,595,757 | 89,463 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meridian, MS | - | 396,329 | 1,152,729 | - | 396,329 | 1,152,729 | 1,549,058 | 48,009 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pearl, MS | - | 299,839 | 616,351 | 7,355 | 299,839 | 623,706 | 923,545 | 15,538 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ridgeland, MS | - | 407,041 | 864,498 | - | 407,041 | 864,498 | 1,271,539 | 36,021 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bowling Green, MO | - | 360,201 | 2,809,170 | - | 360,201 | 2,809,170 | 3,169,371 | 87,742 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
St Robert, MO | - | 394,859 | 1,305,366 | 11,379 | 394,859 | 1,316,745 | 1,711,604 | 32,860 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hamilton, MT | - | 558,047 | 1,083,570 | 442 | 558,047 | 1,084,012 | 1,642,059 | 29,356 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beatty, NV | - | 198,928 | 1,265,084 | 8,051 | 198,928 | 1,273,135 | 1,472,063 | 39,669 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alamogordo, NM | - | 654,965 | 2,716,166 | 143 | 654,965 | 2,716,309 | 3,371,274 | 84,842 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alamogordo, NM | - | 524,763 | 941,615 | 7,522 | 524,763 | 949,137 | 1,473,900 | 25,660 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alcalde, NM | - | 435,486 | 836,499 | - | 435,486 | 836,499 | 1,271,985 | 20,912 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cimarron, NM | - | 345,693 | 1,236,437 | 7,613 | 345,693 | 1,244,050 | 1,589,743 | 33,647 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
La Luz, NM | - | 487,401 | 835,455 | - | 487,401 | 835,455 | 1,322,856 | 22,627 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fayetteville, NC | - | 1,267,529 | 2,527,462 | 16,292 | 1,267,529 | 2,543,754 | 3,811,283 | 68,794 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gastonia, NC | - | 401,119 | 979,803 | 1,631 | 401,119 | 981,434 | 1,382,553 | 26,580 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Devils Lake, ND | - | 323,508 | 1,133,773 | 955 | 323,508 | 1,134,728 | 1,458,236 | 37,357 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
West Fargo, ND | - | 789,855 | 600,976 | 255,626 | 789,855 | 856,602 | 1,646,457 | 20,383 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cambridge, OH | - | 168,717 | 1,113,232 | - | 168,717 | 1,113,232 | 1,281,949 | 51,023 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus, OH | - | 1,109,044 | 1,291,313 | - | 1,109,044 | 1,291,313 | 2,400,357 | 48,344 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grove City, OH | - | 334,032 | 176,274 | - | 334,032 | 176,274 | 510,306 | 6,592 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lorain, OH | - | 808,162 | 1,390,481 | 10,000 | 808,162 | 1,400,481 | 2,208,643 | 60,834 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reynoldsburg, OH | - | 843,336 | 1,197,966 | - | 843,336 | 1,197,966 | 2,041,302 | 44,861 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Springfield, OH | - | 982,451 | 3,957,512 | (3,500 | ) | 982,451 | 3,954,012 | 4,936,463 | 181,158 | 2016 | 40 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ardmore, OK | - | 571,993 | 1,590,151 | - | 571,993 | 1,590,151 | 2,162,144 | 62,945 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dillon, SC | - | 85,896 | 1,697,160 | - | 85,896 | 1,697,160 | 1,783,056 | 81,322 | 2016 | 40 Years |
F- 40 |
Agree Realty Corporation | |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | December 31, 2017 |
COLUMN A | COLUMN B | COLUMN C | COLUMN D | COLUMN E | COLUMN F | COLUMN G | COLUMN H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life on Which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost | Costs Capitalized | Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period | Latest Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Building and | Subsequent to | Building and | Accumulated | Date of | Statement is | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrance | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation | Acquisition | Computed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jasper, TN | - | 190,582 | 966,125 | 6,888 | 190,582 | 973,013 | 1,163,595 | 24,298 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin, TX | - | 4,986,082 | 5,179,446 | 9,988 | 4,986,082 | 5,189,434 | 10,175,516 | 248,182 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carthage, TX | - | 597,995 | 1,965,290 | - | 597,995 | 1,965,290 | 2,563,285 | 73,705 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cedar Park, TX | - | 1,386,802 | 4,656,229 | - | 1,386,802 | 4,656,229 | 6,043,031 | 184,309 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granbury, TX | - | 944,223 | 2,362,540 | - | 944,223 | 2,362,540 | 3,306,763 | 88,603 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hemphill, TX | - | 250,503 | 1,955,918 | 11,886 | 250,503 | 1,967,804 | 2,218,307 | 61,107 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lampasas, TX | - | 245,312 | 1,063,701 | - | 245,312 | 1,063,701 | 1,309,013 | 39,883 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lubbock, TX | - | 1,501,556 | 2,341,031 | - | 1,501,556 | 2,341,031 | 3,842,587 | 87,799 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Odessa, TX | - | 921,043 | 2,434,384 | 5,615 | 921,043 | 2,439,999 | 3,361,042 | 91,310 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Port Arthur, TX | - | 1,889,732 | 8,121,417 | 55 | 1,889,732 | 8,121,472 | 10,011,204 | 270,482 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyler, TX | - | 4,446,648 | 3,178,302 | 2,650 | 4,446,648 | 3,180,952 | 7,627,600 | 104,137 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Farr West, UT | - | 679,206 | 1,040,737 | 3,062 | 679,206 | 1,043,799 | 1,723,005 | 37,858 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provo, UT | - | 1,692,785 | 5,874,584 | 40,450 | 1,692,785 | 5,915,034 | 7,607,819 | 208,176 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
St George, UT | - | 313,107 | 1,009,161 | 13,030 | 313,107 | 1,022,191 | 1,335,298 | 44,151 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tappahannock, VA | - | 1,076,745 | 14,904 | - | 1,076,745 | 14,904 | 1,091,649 | 526 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kirkland, WA | - | 816,072 | - | - | 816,072 | - | 816,072 | - | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Manitowoc, WI | - | 879,237 | 4,467,960 | - | 879,237 | 4,467,960 | 5,347,197 | 148,764 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oak Creek, WI | - | 487,277 | 3,082,180 | 41,775 | 487,277 | 3,123,955 | 3,611,232 | 141,924 | 2016 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oxford, AL | - | 148,407 | 641,820 | - | 148,407 | 641,820 | 790,227 | 10,666 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oxford, AL | - | 255,786 | 7,273,871 | - | 255,786 | 7,273,871 | 7,529,657 | 121,231 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oxford, AL | - | 24,875 | 600,936 | - | 24,875 | 600,936 | 625,811 | 10,016 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jonesboro, AR | - | 3,656,554 | 3,219,456 | - | 3,656,554 | 3,219,456 | 6,876,010 | 17,989 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lowell, AR | - | 949,519 | 1,435,056 | - | 949,519 | 1,435,056 | 2,384,575 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southington, CT | - | 1,088,181 | 1,287,837 | - | 1,088,181 | 1,287,837 | 2,376,018 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Millsboro, DE | - | 3,501,109 | - | - | 3,501,109 | - | 3,501,109 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville,FL | - | 2,298,885 | 2,894,565 | - | 2,298,885 | 2,894,565 | 5,193,450 | 6,030 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange Park, FL | - | 214,858 | 2,304,095 | - | 214,858 | 2,304,095 | 2,518,953 | 28,769 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Port Richey, FL | - | 1,140,182 | 1,649,773 | - | 1,140,182 | 1,649,773 | 2,789,955 | 20,608 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americus, GA | - | 1,318,463 | - | - | 1,318,463 | - | 1,318,463 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brunswick, GA | - | 1,279,688 | 2,158,863 | - | 1,279,688 | 2,158,863 | 3,438,551 | 40,299 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brunswick, GA | - | 126,335 | 1,626,530 | - | 126,335 | 1,626,530 | 1,752,865 | 3,389 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buford, GA | - | 341,860 | 1,023,813 | - | 341,860 | 1,023,813 | 1,365,673 | 12,761 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrollton, GA | - | 597,465 | 886,644 | - | 597,465 | 886,644 | 1,484,109 | 9,152 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decatur, GA | - | 558,859 | 1,429,106 | - | 558,859 | 1,429,106 | 1,987,965 | 2,977 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metter, GA | - | 256,743 | 766,818 | - | 256,743 | 766,818 | 1,023,561 | 7,944 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Villa Rica, GA | - | 410,936 | 1,311,444 | - | 410,936 | 1,311,444 | 1,722,380 | 19,095 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL | - | 2,899,155 | 9,822,986 | - | 2,899,155 | 9,822,986 | 12,722,141 | 184,090 | 2017 | 40 Years |
F- 41 |
Agree Realty Corporation | |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | December 31, 2017 |
COLUMN A | COLUMN B | COLUMN C | COLUMN D | COLUMN E | COLUMN F | COLUMN G | COLUMN H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life on Which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost | Costs Capitalized | Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period | Latest Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Building and | Subsequent to | Building and | Accumulated | Date of | Statement is | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrance | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation | Acquisition | Computed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL | - | 2,081,151 | 5,197,315 | - | 2,081,151 | 5,197,315 | 7,278,466 | 97,078 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Galesburg, IL | - | 214,280 | 979,108 | - | 214,280 | 979,108 | 1,193,388 | 12,215 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mundelein, IL | - | 1,238,743 | - | - | 1,238,743 | - | 1,238,743 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mundelein, IL | - | 1,743,222 | - | - | 1,743,222 | - | 1,743,222 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mundelein, IL | - | 1,803,068 | - | - | 1,803,068 | - | 1,803,068 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Springfield, IL | - | 574,805 | 1,554,786 | - | 574,805 | 1,554,786 | 2,129,591 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodstock, IL | - | 683,419 | 1,002,207 | - | 683,419 | 1,002,207 | 1,685,626 | 2,088 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frankfort, IN | - | 50,458 | 2,008,275 | - | 50,458 | 2,008,275 | 2,058,733 | 33,471 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kokomo, IN | - | 95,196 | 1,484,778 | - | 95,196 | 1,484,778 | 1,579,974 | 3,093 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville, IN | - | 484,117 | 2,458,215 | - | 484,117 | 2,458,215 | 2,942,332 | 30,489 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roeland Park, KS | - | 7,829,806 | - | - | 7,829,806 | - | 7,829,806 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Georgetown, KY | - | 1,996,456 | 6,315,768 | - | 1,996,456 | 6,315,768 | 8,312,224 | 85,869 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hopkinsville, KY | - | 413,269 | 996,619 | - | 413,269 | 996,619 | 1,409,888 | 12,427 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salyersville, KY | - | 289,663 | 906,455 | - | 289,663 | 906,455 | 1,196,118 | 13,182 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amite, LA | - | 601,238 | 1,695,242 | - | 601,238 | 1,695,242 | 2,296,480 | 24,670 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bossier City, LA | - | 797,899 | 2,925,864 | - | 797,899 | 2,925,864 | 3,723,763 | 6,096 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kenner, LA | - | 323,188 | 859,298 | - | 323,188 | 859,298 | 1,182,486 | 5,324 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mandeville, LA | - | 834,891 | 1,294,812 | - | 834,891 | 1,294,812 | 2,129,703 | 8,016 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Orleans, LA | - | - | 6,846,313 | - | - | 6,846,313 | 6,846,313 | 85,529 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore, MD | - | 782,819 | 745,092 | - | 782,819 | 745,092 | 1,527,911 | 3,005 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canton, MI | - | 3,655,296 | - | - | 3,655,296 | - | 3,655,296 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Rapids, MI | - | 7,015,035 | - | - | 7,015,035 | - | 7,015,035 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bloomington, MN | - | 1,491,302 | - | - | 1,491,302 | - | 1,491,302 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maplewood, MN | - | 2,050,168 | 3,517,854 | - | 2,050,168 | 3,517,854 | 5,568,022 | 14,658 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monticello, MN | - | 449,025 | 979,816 | - | 449,025 | 979,816 | 1,428,841 | 22,418 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mountain Iron, MN | - | 177,918 | 1,139,849 | - | 177,918 | 1,139,849 | 1,317,767 | 14,227 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gulfport, MS | - | 671,824 | 1,176,505 | - | 671,824 | 1,176,505 | 1,848,329 | 17,137 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jackson, MS | - | 802,230 | 1,434,997 | - | 802,230 | 1,434,997 | 2,237,227 | 20,902 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
McComb, MS | - | 67,026 | 685,426 | - | 67,026 | 685,426 | 752,452 | 8,519 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kansas City, MO | - | 1,390,880 | 1,588,573 | - | 1,390,880 | 1,588,573 | 2,979,453 | 26,039 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Springfield, MO | - | 616,344 | 2,448,360 | - | 616,344 | 2,448,360 | 3,064,704 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
St. Charles, MO | - | 736,242 | 2,122,426 | - | 736,242 | 2,122,426 | 2,858,668 | 39,777 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
St. Peters, MO | - | 1,364,670 | - | - | 1,364,670 | - | 1,364,670 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boulder City, NV | - | 566,639 | 993,399 | - | 566,639 | 993,399 | 1,560,038 | 12,341 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Egg Harbor, NJ | - | 520,510 | 1,087,374 | - | 520,510 | 1,087,374 | 1,607,884 | 20,361 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secaucus, NJ | 21,500,000 | 19,915,781 | 17,306,541 | - | 19,915,781 | 17,306,541 | 37,222,322 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sewell, NJ | - | 1,809,771 | 6,892,134 | - | 1,809,771 | 6,892,134 | 8,701,905 | 86,144 | 2017 | 40 Years |
F- 42 |
Agree Realty Corporation | |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | December 31, 2017 |
COLUMN A | COLUMN B | COLUMN C | COLUMN D | COLUMN E | COLUMN F | COLUMN G | COLUMN H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life on Which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost | Costs Capitalized | Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period | Latest Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Building and | Subsequent to | Building and | Accumulated | Date of | Statement is | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrance | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation | Acquisition | Computed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Santa Fe, NM | - | 1,072,340 | 4,013,237 | - | 1,072,340 | 4,013,237 | 5,085,577 | 100,328 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statesville, NC | - | 287,467 | 867,849 | - | 287,467 | 867,849 | 1,155,316 | 18,075 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville, NC | - | 308,321 | 875,652 | - | 308,321 | 875,652 | 1,183,973 | 10,920 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minot, ND | - | 928,796 | 1,619,726 | - | 928,796 | 1,619,726 | 2,548,522 | 23,551 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grandview Heights, OH | - | 1,276,870 | 8,557,690 | - | 1,276,870 | 8,557,690 | 9,834,560 | 124,636 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hillard, OH | - | 1,001,228 | - | - | 1,001,228 | - | 1,001,228 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Edmond, OK | - | 1,063,243 | 3,816,155 | - | 1,063,243 | 3,816,155 | 4,879,398 | 15,901 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oklahoma City, OK | - | 868,648 | 1,820,174 | - | 868,648 | 1,820,174 | 2,688,822 | 14,952 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Erie, PA | - | 425,267 | 1,284,883 | - | 425,267 | 1,284,883 | 1,710,150 | 10,574 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pittsburgh, PA | - | 692,454 | 2,509,358 | - | 692,454 | 2,509,358 | 3,201,812 | 31,190 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gaffney, SC | - | 200,845 | 878,455 | - | 200,845 | 878,455 | 1,079,300 | 10,952 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sumter, SC | - | 132,204 | 1,095,478 | - | 132,204 | 1,095,478 | 1,227,682 | 15,944 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chattanooga, TN | - | 2,089,237 | 3,595,808 | - | 2,089,237 | 3,595,808 | 5,685,045 | 7,491 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Etowah, TN | - | 74,057 | 862,436 | - | 74,057 | 862,436 | 936,493 | 16,148 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Memphis, TN | - | 1,661,764 | 3,874,356 | - | 1,661,764 | 3,874,356 | 5,536,120 | 80,656 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alamo, TX | - | 104,878 | 821,355 | - | 104,878 | 821,355 | 926,233 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrews, TX | - | 172,373 | 817,252 | - | 172,373 | 817,252 | 989,625 | 15,323 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arlington, TX | - | 497,852 | 1,601,007 | - | 497,852 | 1,601,007 | 2,098,859 | 23,321 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canyon Lake, TX | - | 382,522 | 1,026,179 | - | 382,522 | 1,026,179 | 1,408,701 | - | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corpus Christi, TX | - | 185,375 | 1,413,298 | - | 185,375 | 1,413,298 | 1,598,673 | 20,460 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fort Stockton, TX | - | 185,474 | 1,186,339 | - | 185,474 | 1,186,339 | 1,371,813 | 17,267 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fort Worth, TX | - | 1,016,587 | 4,622,507 | - | 1,016,587 | 4,622,507 | 5,639,094 | 28,820 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lufkin, TX | - | 1,497,171 | 4,948,906 | - | 1,497,171 | 4,948,906 | 6,446,077 | 92,708 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heber, UT | - | 367,013 | 1,204,635 | - | 367,013 | 1,204,635 | 1,571,648 | 24,186 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Newport News, VA | - | 2,458,053 | 5,390,475 | - | 2,458,053 | 5,390,475 | 7,848,528 | 76,330 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Appleton, WI | - | 417,249 | 1,525,582 | - | 417,249 | 1,525,582 | 1,942,831 | 18,935 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Onalaska, WI | - | 821,084 | 2,651,772 | - | 821,084 | 2,651,772 | 3,472,856 | 38,609 | 2017 | 40 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 89,094,878 | 410,008,398 | 848,998,112 | 17,096,625 | 405,850,207 | 870,252,928 | 1,276,103,135 | 85,467,011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property Under Development | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Various | - | - | 25,402,255 | - | - | 25,402,255 | 25,402,255 | - | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub Total | - | - | 25,402,255 | - | - | 25,402,255 | 25,402,255 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 89,094,878 | $ | 410,008,398 | $ | 874,400,367 | $ | 17,096,625 | $ | 405,850,207 | $ | 895,655,183 | $ | 1,301,505,390 | $ | 85,467,011 |
F- 43 |
Agree Realty Corporation | |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | December 31, 2016 |
1. Reconciliation of Real Estate Properties
The following table reconciles the Real Estate Properties from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017.
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Balance at January 1 | $ | 1,019,956,329 | $ | 755,848,938 | $ | 589,147,012 | ||||||
Construction and acquisition cost | 312,695,116 | 284,968,286 | 196,672,924 | |||||||||
Impairment charge | - | - | - | |||||||||
Disposition of real estate | (31,146,055 | ) | (20,860,895 | ) | (29,970,998 | ) | ||||||
Reclassified as assets held for sale | (2,250,558 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Balance at December 31 | $ | 1,299,254,832 | $ | 1,019,956,329 | $ | 755,848,938 |
2. Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation
The following table reconciles the Real Estate Properties from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017.
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Balance at January 1 | $ | 69,696,727 | $ | 56,401,423 | $ | 59,089,851 | ||||||
Current year depreciation expense | 19,507,398 | 15,201,469 | 11,464,695 | |||||||||
Disposition of real estate | (3,737,114 | ) | (1,906,165 | ) | (14,153,123 | ) | ||||||
Reclassified as assets held for sale | (228,397 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Balance at December 31 | $ | 85,238,614 | $ | 69,696,727 | $ | 56,401,423 |
3. Tax Basis of Building and Improvements
The aggregate cost of Building and Improvements for federal income tax purposes is approximately $38,194,000 less than the cost basis used for financial statement purposes.
F- 44 |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AGREE REALTY CORPORATION
By: | /s/ Joel N. Agree | Date: February 22, 2018 | |
Joel N. Agree | |||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned officers and directors of Agree Realty Corporation, hereby severally constitute Richard Agree, Joel N. Agree and Clayton Thelen, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them singly, to sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed herewith and any and all amendments to said Annual Report on Form 10-K, and generally to do all such things in our names and in our capacities as officers and directors to enable Agree Realty Corporation to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorneys, or any of them, to said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto.
PURSUANT to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 22nd day of February 2018.
By: | /s/ Richard Agree | Date: February 22, 2018 | |
Richard Agree | |||
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors | |||
By: | /s/ Joel N. Agree | Date: February 22, 2018 | |
Joel N. Agree | |||
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | |||
(Principal Executive Officer) | |||
By: | /s/ Clayton Thelen | Date: February 22, 2018 | |
Clayton Thelen | |||
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary | |||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | |||
By: | /s/ Merrie S. Frankel | Date: February 22, 2018 | |
Merrie S. Frankel | |||
Director | |||
By: | /s/ Farris G. Kalil | Date: February 22, 2018 | |
Farris G. Kalil | |||
Director | |||
By: | /s/ John Rakolta | Date: February 22, 2018 | |
John Rakolta Jr. | |||
Director | |||
By: | /s/ Jerome Rossi | Date: February 22, 2018 | |
Jerome Rossi | |||
Director | |||
By: | /s/ William S. Rubenfaer | Date: February 22, 2018 | |
William S. Rubenfaer | |||
Director | |||
By: | /s/ Leon M. Schurgin | Date: February 22, 2018 | |
Leon M. Schurgin | |||
Director |
39 |
Exhibit – 10.14
SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
AGREE REALTY CORPORATION
Annual Cash Retainer:
Non-Employee Director : $30,000
Audit Committee Chair : $4,000 (in addition to non-employee retainer)
Other:
Directors traveling from outside the Bloomfield Hills, Michigan area are reimbursed for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings of the Board or any committees thereof.
Directors who are employees or officers of the Company do not receive any compensation for serving on the Board or any committees thereof.
Exhibit 10.17
PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARD NOTICE
Agree Realty Corporation
, 20
THIS PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARD NOTICE, dated as of _________, 20__, sets forth the terms of a grant of performance shares by Agree Realty Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the “ Company ”), to the Grantee named below.
WHEREAS, the Company has adopted the Agree Realty Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “ Plan ”) in order to enhance the ability of the Company to attract and retain highly qualified employees and to motivate those employees to improve the business results of the Company; and
WHEREAS, the Committee has determined to grant to the Grantee an award of Performance Shares as provided herein to encourage the Grantee’s efforts toward the continuing success of the Company.
The Company grants to the Grantee an award on the following terms and subject to the following conditions:
1. | Grant by the Company . The Company grants to the Grantee a Performance Award for Performance Shares (the “ Award ”). Subject to the terms and conditions hereof, payment with respect to vested Awards shall be made entirely in the form of shares of Restricted Stock of the Company. This Award shall be construed in accordance and consistent with, and subject to, the provisions of the Plan (the provisions of which are hereby incorporated by reference) and, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, the capitalized terms used in this Award shall have the same definitions as set forth in the Plan. |
AWARD SUMMARY | |
Name of Grantee: | _________________ |
Target Number of Performance Shares: | _________________ |
Grant Date: | _____________, 20__ |
Performance Period: | December 31, 20__ through December 31, 20__ |
2. | Performance Objective . Performance Shares shall be earned based on the achievement of (i) as to 50% of the Award, relative annualized Total Shareholder Return of the Company percentile rank relative to the MSCI US REIT index from the period from December 31, 20__ through December 31, 20__ (the “ Performance Period ”) and (ii) as to 50% of the Award, relative annualized Total Shareholder Return compared to the Total Shareholder Return of designated peer companies over the Performance Period as provided on the attached Appendix A . “ Total Shareholder Return ” shall be defined as the increase in value of a fixed amount invested in the common shares of an entity, taking into account both stock price appreciation and dividends or other distributions, during the Performance Period (dividends are calculated as if they are reinvested in a company’s stock as of the ex-dividend date based on such date’s closing stock price). In determining the value of shares at the beginning and end of the Performance Period, the Committee shall use the average closing price for the twenty (20) trading days ending on the beginning and end of the Performance Period. For the portion of the Award described in (ii), above, the Company’s Total Shareholder Return shall be compared to the Total Shareholder Returns achieved by a group of peer companies (the “ Peer Group ”), with the result expressed as a percentile (where the Company is considered to be part of the peer set). The applicable Peer Group for the Performance Period is the group of publically traded REITs listed on the attached Appendix A . |
3. | Peer Group Adjustments . Any company in the Peer Group that files for bankruptcy protection shall be placed at the bottom of the Peer Group. Any company in the Peer Group that is acquired and is no longer separately trading will be excluded from the Peer Group, and the size of the Peer Group will be reduced by one. No changes to the Peer Group will be made as a result of an acquisition or divestiture by a company in the Peer Group of a portion of its business, as such events are generally considered to be part of the ordinary course of business; however, in the instance where a peer company has entered an agreement to be acquired and such transaction has not yet been consummated at the end of the performance period, such peer company will be excluded from results as if it had already been acquired. |
4. | Determination of Award and Notice . As soon as possible after the end of the Performance Period, but in no event later than March 15 of the year following the end of the Performance Period, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) will certify in writing whether and to what extent the performance measures have been achieved for the Performance Period and determine the number of shares of Restricted Stock, if any, to be issued to the Grantee in accordance with the matrix set forth in Appendix A ; provided, that, if the Committee certifies that the performance measures have been met, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, reduce the number of shares to be issued to the Grantee with respect to the Award. The date of the Committee’s certification pursuant to this Section 4 shall hereinafter be referred to as the “ Certification Date .” The Company will notify the Grantee of the Committee’s certification promptly following the Certification Date. Any Restricted Stock earned shall vest one-third on _________, 20__, one-third on __________, 20__ and one-third on ___________, 20__, in accordance with the Company’s standard form of restricted stock award agreement. |
5. | Forfeiture of Award Prior to Vesting Date . Except as provided by the Committee, the Grantee will not be entitled to any issuance of shares with respect to the Award if the Grantee is not, for any reason, employed by the Company or an Affiliate of the Company on the Certification Date. |
6. | No Rights as a Shareholder . Prior to any issuance of shares, the Grantee shall not at any time have any rights as a shareholder with respect to any Award. No dividends (or dividend equivalents) will be paid on any unearned Performance Shares. Dividends on earned Performance Shares shall accrue from the Grant Date until the Certification Date and shall be paid on ____________, 20__ [the date of the vesting of the first installment of restricted stock to vest], to the extent of Performance Shares that are earned and result in a share issuance. |
7. | No Right to Continued Employment . Nothing in this Award or the Plan shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company to terminate the Grantee’s employment, nor confer upon the Grantee any right to continuance of employment by the Company or any Affiliate. |
8. | Construction . This Award is made and granted pursuant to the Plan and is in all respects limited by and subject to the terms of the Plan. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Award and the terms of the Plan, the terms of the Plan shall be controlling. To the extent not prohibited by applicable law or the Plan, the terms of any employment, severance or change in control agreement between the Grantee and the Company shall supersede the terms and definitions under the 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan and this Agreement with respect to the Performance Shares awarded hereunder. All decisions of the Committee with respect to any question or issue arising under the Plan or this Award shall be conclusive and binding on all persons having an interest in the Award. |
9. | Resolution of Disputes . Any dispute or disagreement which may arise under, or as a result of, or in any way relate to, the interpretation, construction or application of this Award shall be determined by the Committee. Any determination made hereunder shall be final, binding and conclusive on the Grantee, the Grantee’s heirs, executors, administrators and successors, and the Company and its Affiliates for all purposes. |
10. | Entire Statement of Award . This Award and the terms and conditions of the Plan constitute the entire understanding between the Grantee and the Company and its Affiliates, and supersede all other agreements, whether written or oral, with respect to the Award. |
11. | Headings . The headings of this Award are inserted for convenience only and do not constitute a part of this Award. |
12. | Code Section 409A . The Award is intended to either be exempt from or to comply with Code Section 409A and shall be interpreted and administered consistent with that intent, provided , however , that the Company makes no representation regarding the status of the Award under Code Section 409A and the Company shall not be liable for any additional tax, interest or penalty that may be imposed upon the Grantee, or other damage that may be suffered by the Grantee, as a result of the Award being subject to and not in compliance with Code Section 409A. Each payment required to be made hereunder shall be treated as a separate and distinct payment for purposes of Code Section 409A. If (i) an amount owing to the Grantee hereunder constitutes nonqualified deferred compensation subject to Code Section 409A, (ii) the amount is considered to be payable to the Grantee as a result of the Grantee’s “separation from service” with the Company and its Affiliates for purposes and within the meaning of Code Section 409A, and (iii) the Grantee is at the time of separation from service a “specified employee” of the Company and its Affiliates, then (notwithstanding any other provision hereof) the amount shall not be paid to the Grantee any earlier than the time when such amount may be paid to the Grantee without the Grantee being subject to liability for additional tax on such amount under Code Section 409A. |
13. | Tax Withholding Obligation . If upon the Certification Date, any vesting date or other applicable date there shall be payable by the Company or an affiliate of the Company any statutory income and/or employment tax withholding, in the Company's discretion, then unless provided otherwise by the Company, such tax withholding obligations, if any, will be satisfied by the Company withholding a number of shares of Common Stock that would otherwise be vested under the Award in an amount that the Company determines has a fair market value sufficient to meet such tax withholding obligations, up to the maximum statutory withholding requirement. In the Company's discretion, it may require or permit reimbursement or payment of such tax withholding obligations by wire transfer, certified check, additional payroll withholding or other means acceptable to the Company and upon such terms and conditions as the Company may prescribe. The Company may also permit the Grantee to tender shares to the Company subsequent to receipt of such shares in respect of an Award. The Company is permitted to defer issuance of shares until reimbursement or payment by the Grantee to the Company or an affiliate of the Company of the amount of any such tax. |
The Grantee is ultimately liable and responsible for all taxes owed by such Grantee in connection with the Award, regardless of any action the Company takes with respect to any tax withholding obligations that arise in connection with the Award. The Company makes no representation or undertaking regarding the treatment of any tax withholding in connection with the grant or issuance of the Performance Shares or the subsequent sale of any of the shares underlying the Performance Shares. The Company does not commit and is under no obligation to structure the Award program to reduce or eliminate the Participant's tax liability.
AGREE REALTY COMPANY | ||
By: | ||
Its: |
APPENDIX A
Custom Peer Group
MSCI US REIT Index (as of , 20 )
Payout level for each portion of the Award
Level |
Comparative
Total
Shareholder Return Percentile |
Percentage of Target
Number of Performance Shares |
||
Threshold | __ th | __% | ||
Target | __ th | __% | ||
Maximum | __ th | __% |
There will be a linear increase in payout between the performance levels if Threshold performance is achieved; no payout shall occur below __ th percentile performance.
EXHIBIT 12.1
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
Year | Year | Year | Year | Year | ||||||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
Income From Continuing Operations | 58,790 | 45,797 | 39,762 | 18,776 | $ | 18,945 | ||||||||||||||
Add: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest on indebtedness | 17,158 | 14,521 | 11,616 | 7,636 | 5,739 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of financing costs | 979 | 822 | 690 | 951 | 736 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings | $ | 76,927 | $ | 61,140 | $ | 52,068 | $ | 27,363 | $ | 25,420 | ||||||||||
Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest on indebtedness and capitalized interest | $ | 17,728 | $ | 14,732 | $ | 11,655 | $ | 7,899 | $ | 6,306 | ||||||||||
Amortization of financing costs | 979 | 822 | 690 | 951 | 736 | |||||||||||||||
Fixed charges | 18,707 | 15,554 | 12,345 | 8,850 | 7,042 | |||||||||||||||
Add: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends | $ | 18,707 | $ | 15,554 | $ | 12,345 | $ | 8,850 | $ | 7,042 | ||||||||||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges | 4.11 | x | 3.93 | x | 4.22 | x | 3.09 | x | 3.61 | x |
Exhibit 21
AGREE REALTY CORPORATION
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017
Subsidary | Jurisdiction of Organization | |
Agree Limited Partnership | Delaware | |
Agree – Columbia Crossing Project, LLC | Delaware | |
Ann Arbor Store No 1, LLC | Delaware | |
Indianapolis Store No. 16, LLC | Delaware | |
Boynton Beach Store No. 150, LLC | Delaware | |
Mt Pleasant Shopping Center LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Facility No. 1, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Bristol & Fenton Project, LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Realty South-East, LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Elkhart, LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Plainfield, LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Port St. John LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Charlotte County, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Silver Springs Shores, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree St. Augustine Shores, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree 103-Middleburg Jacksonville, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Brighton, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Lowell, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Atlantic Beach, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Southfield & Webster, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Development, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Realty Services, LLC | Delaware | |
Lawrence Store No. 203, L.L.C. | Delaware | |
Agree Ann Arbor Jackson, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Beecher LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Corunna LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Construction Management LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Atchison, LLC | Kansas | |
Agree Johnstown, LLC | Ohio | |
Agree Lake in the Hills, LLC | Illinois | |
NESOR REALTY VENTURES LLC | Florida | |
Agree Antioch, LLC | Illinois | |
Agree Concord, LLC | North Carolina | |
Agree Mansfield, LLC | Connecticut | |
Agree Tallahassee, LLC | Florida | |
Agree Spring Grove, LLC | Illinois | |
Agree Shelby, LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Wilmington, LLC | North Carolina | |
Agree Marietta, LLC | Georgia | |
Agree Boynton, LLC | Florida | |
Agree Indianapolis, LLC | Indiana | |
Agree M-59 LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Dallas Forest Drive, LLC | Texas | |
Agree Roseville CA, LLC | California | |
Agree Wawa Baltimore, LLC | Maryland | |
Agree New Lenox, LLC | Illinois | |
Agree Chandler, LLC | Arizona | |
Agree Fort Walton Beach, LLC | Florida | |
Agree Portland OR LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Rancho Cordova I | California | |
Agree Rancho Cordova II | California | |
Agree Southfield LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Poinciana LLC | Florida | |
Agree Venice, LLC | Florida | |
Agree Madison AL LLC | Alabama | |
Agree Leawood, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Walker, LLC | Michigan | |
Agree 17-92, LLC | Florida | |
Agree Pinellas Park, LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Mall of Louisiana, LLC | Louisiana | |
Agree Cochran GA, LLC | Georgia | |
Agree Tri-State Lease, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Fort Mill SC, LLC | South Carolina | |
Agree Spartanburg SC LLC | South Carolina | |
Agree Springfield IL LLC | Illinois | |
Agree Jacksonville NC, LLC | North Carolina | |
Agree Greenville SC, LLC | South Carolina | |
ACCP Maryland, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree – Milestone Center Project, LLC | Delaware | |
AMCP Germantown, LLC | Delaware | |
Oklahoma City Store No. 151, LLC | Delaware | |
Omaha Store No. 166, LLC | Delaware | |
Phoenix Drive, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Morrow GA, LLC | Georgia | |
Agree Charlotte Poplar, LLC | North Carolina | |
Agree East Palatka, LLC | Florida | |
Agree Lyons GA LLC | Georgia | |
Agree Fuquay Varina LLC | North Carolina | |
Agree Minneapolis Clinton Ave, LLC | Minnesota | |
Agree Wichita, LLC | Kansas | |
Agree 117 Mission, LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Holdings I, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Lake Zurich IL, LLC | Illinois | |
Agree Ann Arbor State Street, LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Lebanon VA LLC | Virginia | |
Agree Harlingen LLC | Texas | |
Agree Wichita Falls TX LLC | Texas | |
Agree Pensacola LLC | Florida | |
Agree Pensacola Nine Mile LLC | Florida | |
2355 Jackson Avenue, LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Statham GA, LLC | Georgia | |
Agree North Las Vegas, LLC | Nevada | |
Agree St. Joseph MO, LLC | Missouri | |
Agree Memphis Getwell, LLC | Tennessee | |
Agree Chicago Kedzie, LLC | Illinois | |
Agree Sun Valley NV LLC | Nevada | |
Agree Rapid City SD, LLC | South Dakota | |
Agree Manchester CT, LLC | Connecticut | |
Agree Grand Forks LLC | North Dakota | |
Agree Madisonville TX LLC | Texas | |
Agree Brooklyn OH LLC | Ohio | |
Agree Baton Rouge LA LLC | Louisiana | |
Agree Forest MS LLC | Mississippi | |
Agree St Petersburg LLC | Florida | |
Agree Berkeley Solano, LLC | California | |
Agree Rochester NY LLC | New York | |
Agree New Lenox 2 LLC | Illinois | |
Agree Allentown PA LLC | Pennsylvania | |
Agree Joplin MO LLC | Missouri | |
Agree Berwyn IL LLC | Illinois | |
Agree Anderson SC LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Cannon Station LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Forest VA LLC | Virginia | |
Agree Indianapolis Glendale LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Burlington WA, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree McKinney TX, LLC | Texas | |
Agree Littleton CO, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Ligonier PA, LLC | Pennsylvania | |
Agree Montgomeryville PA, LLC | Pennsylvania | |
Agree Columbia SC, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Richmond VA, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Asset Services, LLC (LUNACORP, LLC) | Delaware | |
Agree Center Point Birmingham AL, LLC | Alabama | |
Agree Montgomery AL, LLC | Alabama | |
Agree Daniel Morgan Ave Spartanburg, LLC | South Carolina | |
Agree Magnolia Knoxville TN, LLC | Tennessee | |
Agree Alcoa TN, LLC | Tennessee | |
Agree Belton MO, LLC | Missouri | |
Agree Terre Haute IN, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Junction City KS, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Novi MI, LLC | Michigan | |
Agree Palafox Pensacola FL, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Arlington TX LLC | Texas | |
Agree Grand Chute WI LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Belvidere IL LLC | Illinois | |
Agree Lejune Springfield IL, LLC | Illinois | |
Agree Fort Worth TX, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Topeka KS, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Brenham TX, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Salem OR, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Portland ME, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Davenport IA, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Buffalo Center IA, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Springfield OH, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Altoona PA, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Orange & McCoy, LLC | Florida | |
Agree Hazard KY, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Marshall MI Outlot, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Indianapolis IN II, LLC | Delaware | |
Mt. Pleasant Outlot I, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Wheaton IL, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Jackson MS, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Des Moines IA, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Holly Springs MS, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Apopka FL, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Cedar Park TX, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Evergreen CO, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Kirkland WA, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Mt. Dora FL, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Port Orange FL, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Sarasota FL, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Sunnyvale CA, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Upland CA, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Vero Beach FL, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Whittier CA, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree CW, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Provo UT, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree MCW, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree North Miami FL, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Stores, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree 2016, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree 1031, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Statesville NC, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Archer Chicago IL, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Oxford Commons AL, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Egg Harbor NJ, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Grandview Heights OH, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Hopkinsville KY, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Minot ND, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree DT Jacksonville NC, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree RT Amite LA, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree RT Arlington TX LLC | Delaware | |
Agree RT Gulfport MS, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree RT Jackson MS, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree RT Villa Rica GA, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree RT Port Richey | Delaware | |
Pharm Nashville IN, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Appleton WI, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Bloomington MN, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Millsboro DE, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Baltimore MD, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Secaucus NJ, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Americus GA, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Edmond OK, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Woodstock IL, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Springfield MO LLC | Delaware | |
Agree K&G Joplin MO LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Lowell AR LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Crystal River FL, LLC | Delaware | |
Agree Rockford IL, LLC | Delaware |
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We have issued our reports dated February 22, 2018, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Agree Realty Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. We consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Agree Realty Corporation on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-218476 and 333-201420) and on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-197096, 333-141471 and 333-121491).
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP | |
Southfield, Michigan | |
February 22, 2018 |
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Joel N. Agree, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2017 of Agree Realty Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 22, 2018 | /s/ Joel N. Agree | ||
Name: | Joel N. Agree | ||
Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Clayton Thelen, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2017 of Agree Realty Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 22, 2018 | /s/ Clayton Thelen | ||
Name: | Clayton Thelen | ||
Title: | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Based on a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2017 of Agree Realty Corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joel N. Agree, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. | The Report, containing the financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
/s/ Joel N. Agree | |
Joel N. Agree | |
President and Chief Executive Officer | |
February 22, 2018 |
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Based on a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2017 of Agree Realty Corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Clayton Thelen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. | The Report, containing the financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
/s/ Clayton Thelen | |
Clayton Thelen | |
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary | |
February 22, 2018 |
Exhibit 99.1
MATERIAL FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion amends, re-states and supersedes in its entirety the discussion of material U.S. federal income tax considerations included under the heading “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” in Agree Realty Corporation’s base prospectus (the “Prospectus”) included in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3ASR filed on June 2, 2017, as amended and supplemented, in light of the signing into law of H.R. 1, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, on December 22, 2017.
We urge you to consult your tax advisor regarding the specific tax consequences to you of ownership of our securities and of our election to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”). Specifically, you are urged to consult your tax advisor regarding the federal, state, local, foreign, and other tax consequences to you regarding the purchase, ownership and sale of our securities. You are also urged to consult with your tax advisor regarding the impact of potential changes in the applicable tax laws.
The following is a summary of the material federal income tax consequences and considerations relating to the acquisition, holding, and disposition of our securities. For purposes of this discussion under the heading “Material Federal Income Tax Considerations,” “we,” “our,” “us,” and the “Company” refer to Agree Realty Corporation, but excluding all its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, and the “Operating Partnership” refers to Agree Limited Partnership. This summary is based upon the Code, the regulations promulgated by the U.S. Treasury Department (which are referred to in this section as “Treasury Regulations”), rulings and other administrative pronouncements issued by the IRS, and judicial decisions, all as currently in effect, and all of which are subject to differing interpretations or to change, possibly with retroactive effect. The following reflects changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws made by legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is a far-reaching and complex revision to the U.S. federal income tax laws with disparate and, in some cases, countervailing impacts on different categories of taxpayers and industries, and will require subsequent rulemaking in a number of areas. The long-term impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on us, our stockholders, our tenants and the real estate industry cannot be reliably predicted at this early stage of the new law's implementation.
No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any description of the tax consequences summarized below. No advance ruling has been or will be sought from the IRS regarding any matter discussed in this the Prospectus. This summary is also based upon the assumption that we, and each of our subsidiaries and affiliated entities, will act in accordance with any applicable organizational documents or partnership or limited liability company operating agreement. This summary is for general information only, and does not purport to discuss all aspects of federal income taxation that may be important to a particular investor in light of its investment or tax circumstances, or to investors subject to special tax rules, such as:
· | financial institutions; |
· | insurance companies; |
· | broker-dealers; |
· | regulated investment companies; |
· | holders who receive securities through the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation; |
· | persons holding securities as part of a “straddle,” “hedge,” “conversion transaction,” “synthetic security” or other integrated investment; |
· | except to the extent discussed below, tax-exempt organizations; and |
· | except to the extent discussed below, foreign investors. |
In addition, certain U.S. expatriates, including certain individuals who have lost U.S. citizenship and “long-term residents” (within the meaning of Section 877(e)(2) of the Code) who have ceased to be lawful permanent residents of the United States, are subject to special rules.
The federal income tax treatment of holders of securities depends in some instances on determinations of fact and interpretations of complex provisions of federal income tax law for which no clear precedent or authority may be available. In addition, the tax consequences of holding securities to any particular holder will depend on the holder’s particular tax circumstances. You are urged to consult your own tax advisor regarding the federal, state, local, and foreign income and other tax consequences to you (in light of your particular investment or tax circumstances) of acquiring, holding, exchanging, or otherwise disposing of securities.
Taxation of the Company
We have elected to be a REIT for federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code and applicable provisions of the Treasury Regulations, which set forth the requirements for qualifying as a REIT. Our policy has been and is to operate in such a manner as to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. If we so qualify, then we will generally not be subject to federal income tax on income we distribute to our shareholders. For any year in which we do not meet the requirements for qualification as a REIT, we will be taxed as a corporation. See “— Failure to Qualify” below.
Taxation of REITs in General
As indicated above, our qualification and taxation as a REIT depend upon our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various qualification requirements imposed upon REITs by the Code. The material qualification requirements are summarized below under “— Requirements for Qualification — General.”
While we intend to operate so that we qualify as a REIT, no assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge our REIT status, or that we will be able to operate in accordance with the REIT requirements in the future.
As a REIT, we will generally be entitled to a deduction for dividends that we pay, and therefore will not be subject to federal corporate income tax on our net income that is currently distributed to our shareholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” at the corporate and shareholder levels that results from investment in a corporation or an entity treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes. Rather, income generated by a REIT generally is taxed only at the shareholder level upon a distribution of dividends by the REIT. Net operating losses, foreign tax credits and other tax attributes of a REIT do not pass through to the shareholders of the REIT, subject to special rules for certain items such as capital gains recognized by REITs. See “Federal Income Taxation of Shareholders” below.
As a REIT, we will nonetheless be subject to federal tax in the following circumstances:
· | We will be taxed at regular corporate rates on any undistributed income, including undistributed net capital gains. |
· | If we have net income from “prohibited transactions,” which are, in general, sales or other dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property, held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, such income will be subject to a 100% excise tax. See “— Prohibited Transactions” and “— Foreclosure Property” below. |
· | If we elect to treat property that we acquire in connection with a foreclosure of a mortgage loan or certain leasehold terminations as “foreclosure property,” we may thereby avoid the 100% excise tax on gain from a resale of that property (if the sale would otherwise constitute a prohibited transaction), but the income from the sale or operation of the property may be subject to corporate income tax at the highest applicable rate (currently 21%). |
We will be subject to a 100% penalty tax on any redetermined rents, redetermined deductions, excess interest, and redetermined TRS service income. In general, redetermined rents are rents from real property that are overstated as a result of services furnished by a “taxable REIT subsidiary” (“TRS”) of ours to any of our tenants. Redetermined deductions and excess interest represent amounts that are deducted by a TRS of ours for amounts paid to us that are in excess of the amounts that would have been charged based on arm’s-length negotiations. Redetermined TRS service income is income of a TRS attributable to services provided to, or on behalf of, us (other than services furnished or rendered to a tenant of ours) to the extent such income is lower than the income the TRS would have earned based on arm’s length negotiations. See “— Redetermined Rents, Redetermined Deductions, Excess Interest and Redetermined TRS Service Income” below.
If we should fail to satisfy the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test discussed below, due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, and we maintain our qualification as a REIT as a result of specified cure provisions, we will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount equal to (1) the amount by which we fail the 75% gross income test or the amount by which we fail the 95% gross income test (whichever is greater), multiplied by (2) a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.
If we fail to satisfy any of the REIT asset tests (other than a de minimis failure of the 5% and 10% asset tests) described below, due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, and we maintain our REIT qualification as a result of specified cure provisions, we will be required to pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the nonqualifying assets that caused us to fail such test.
If we fail to satisfy any requirement of the Code for qualifying as a REIT, other than a failure to satisfy the REIT gross income tests or asset tests, and the failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, we may retain our REIT qualification but we will be required to pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure.
If we should fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (1) 85% of our “REIT ordinary income” (i.e., “REIT taxable income” excluding capital gain and without regard to the dividends paid deduction) for such year, (2) 95% of our REIT capital gain net income for such year, and (3) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, we would be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such sum over the aggregate of amounts actually distributed and retained amounts on which income tax is paid at the corporate level.
We may be required to pay monetary penalties to the IRS in certain circumstances, including if we fail to meet certain record keeping requirements intended to monitor our compliance with rules relating to the composition of a REIT’s shareholders, as described below in “— Requirements for Qualification — General.”
If we acquire any asset from a subchapter C corporation in a transaction in which gain or loss is not recognized, and we subsequently recognize gain on the disposition of any such asset during the five-year period (to which we refer in this section as the “Recognition Period”) beginning on the date on which we acquire the asset, then the excess of (1) the fair market value of the asset as of the beginning of the Recognition Period, over (2) our adjusted basis in such asset as of the beginning of such Recognition Period (to which we refer in this section as “Built-in Gain”) will generally be (with certain adjustments) subject to tax at the highest corporate income tax rate. Similar rules would apply if within the five-year period beginning on the first day of a taxable year for which we re-qualify as a REIT after being subject to tax as a corporation under subchapter C of the Code for more than two years we were to dispose of any assets that we held on such first day.
Certain of our subsidiaries are corporations and their earnings are subject to corporate income tax.
In addition, we and our subsidiaries may be subject to a variety of taxes, including payroll taxes, and state and local income, property and other taxes on our assets and operations. We could also be subject to tax in situations and on transactions not currently contemplated.
Requirements for Qualification — General
The Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association:
(1) | that is managed by one or more trustees or directors; |
(2) | the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable shares or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest; |
(3) | that would be taxable as a domestic corporation but for the special Code provisions applicable to REITs; |
(4) | that is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company subject to certain provisions of the Code; |
(5) | the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons; |
(6) | not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock of which is owned, directly or indirectly through the application of certain attribution rules, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain tax-exempt entities) during the last half of each taxable year; and |
(7) | that meets other tests described below, including tests with respect to the nature of its income and assets and the amount of its distributions. |
The Code provides that conditions (1) through (4) must be met during the entire taxable year and that condition (5) must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. We believe that we have been organized and operated in a manner that has allowed us to satisfy the requirements set forth in (1) through (7) above. In addition, our charter currently includes certain restrictions regarding transfer of our shares of capital stock which are intended (among other things) to assist us in continuing to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in (5) and (6) above.
To monitor compliance with the share ownership requirements, we are required to maintain records regarding the actual ownership of our shares. To do so, we must demand written statements each year from the record holders of significant percentages of our shares in which the record holders are to disclose the actual owners of such shares (that is, the persons required to include in gross income the dividends we paid). A list of those persons failing or refusing to comply with this demand must be maintained as part of our records. Our failure to comply with these record-keeping requirements could subject us to monetary penalties. A shareholder that fails or refuses to comply with the demand is required by Treasury Regulations to submit a statement with its tax return disclosing the actual ownership of the shares and other information.
In addition, we may not elect to become a REIT unless our taxable year is the calendar year. We satisfy this requirement.
Effect of Subsidiary Entities
Ownership of Partnership Interests. In the case of a REIT that is a partner in a partnership (treating, as a partner of a partnership for this purpose, a member of a limited liability company that is classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes), Treasury Regulations provide that the REIT will be deemed to own its proportionate share of the assets of the partnership, and the REIT will be deemed to be entitled to the income of the partnership attributable to such share. The character of the assets and gross income of the partnership (determined at the level of the partnership) are the same in the hands of the REIT for purposes of Section 856 of the Code, including satisfying the gross income and asset tests described below. Accordingly, our proportionate share of the assets, liabilities, and items of income of the Operating Partnership and our other subsidiary partnerships (provided that the subsidiary partnerships are not taxable as corporations for federal income tax purposes) is treated as our assets, liabilities and items of income for purposes of applying the requirements described in this summary (including the gross income and asset tests described below). One exception to the rule described above is that, for purposes of the prohibition against holding securities having a value greater than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer discussed under “— Asset Tests” below, a REIT’s proportionate share of any securities held by a partnership is not based solely on its capital interest in the partnership but also includes its interest (as a creditor) in certain debt securities of the partnership (excluding “straight debt” and certain other securities described under “— Asset Tests” below). A summary of certain rules governing the federal income taxation of partnerships and their partners is provided below in “Tax Aspects of Investment in the Operating Partnership.”
Disregarded Subsidiaries. If a REIT owns a corporate subsidiary that is a “qualified REIT subsidiary,” that subsidiary is disregarded for federal income tax purposes, and all assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of the subsidiary are treated as assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of the REIT itself, including for purposes of applying the gross income and asset tests applicable to REITs summarized below. A qualified REIT subsidiary is any corporation, other than a “taxable REIT subsidiary” (described below), that is wholly-owned by a REIT, or by other disregarded subsidiaries, or by a combination of the two. Other entities we wholly own, including single member limited liability companies, are also generally disregarded as separate entities for federal income tax purposes, including for purposes of applying the REIT income and asset tests described below. Disregarded subsidiaries, along with our subsidiary partnerships, are sometimes referred to as “pass-through subsidiaries.” In the event that any of our disregarded subsidiaries ceases to be wholly-owned by us (for example, if any equity interest in the subsidiary is acquired by a person other than us or one of our other disregarded subsidiaries), the subsidiary’s separate existence would no longer be disregarded for federal income tax purposes. Instead, it would have multiple owners and would be treated as either a partnership or a taxable corporation. Such an event could, depending on the circumstances, adversely affect our ability to satisfy the various asset and gross income requirements applicable to REITs, including the requirement that REITs generally may not own, directly or indirectly, more than 10% (as measured by either voting power or value) of the securities of any one issuer. See “— Income Tests” and “— Asset Tests” below.
Taxable Subsidiaries. A REIT may jointly elect with a subsidiary corporation, whether or not wholly-owned, to treat the subsidiary corporation as a TRS of the REIT. In addition, a corporation (other than a REIT or qualified REIT subsidiary) is treated as a TRS if a TRS of a REIT owns directly or indirectly securities possessing more than 35% of the total voting power, or having more than 35% of the total value, of the outstanding securities of the corporation. We have interests in several corporations treated as TRSs. The separate existence of a TRS or other taxable corporation, unlike a disregarded subsidiary as discussed above, is not ignored for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, our TRSs are subject to corporate income tax on their earnings, and this may reduce the aggregate cash flow that we and our subsidiaries generate and thus our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
A parent REIT is not treated as holding the assets of a taxable subsidiary corporation or as receiving any undistributed income that the subsidiary earns. Rather, the stock issued by the subsidiary is an asset in the hands of the parent REIT, and the REIT recognizes, as income, any dividends that it receives from the subsidiary. This treatment can affect the income and asset test calculations that apply to the REIT. Because a parent REIT does not include the assets and undistributed income of taxable subsidiary corporations in determining the parent’s compliance with the REIT requirements, these entities may be used by the parent REIT indirectly to undertake activities that the applicable rules might otherwise preclude the parent REIT from doing directly or through pass-through subsidiaries (for example, activities that give rise to certain categories of income, such as management fees, that do not qualify under the 75% and 95% gross income tests described below).
In addition, certain sections of the Code that are intended to ensure that transactions between a parent REIT and its TRS occur at arm’s length and on commercially reasonably terms may prevent a TRS from deducting interest on debt funded directly or indirectly by its parent REIT if certain tests regarding the TRS’s debt to equity ratio and interest expense are not satisfied.
Income Tests
In order to maintain qualification as a REIT, we must annually satisfy two gross income requirements. First, at least 75% of our gross income for each taxable year, excluding gross income from sales of inventory or dealer property in “prohibited transactions,” must derive from (1) investments in real property or mortgages on real property, including “rents from real property,” dividends received from other REITs, interest income derived from mortgage loans secured by real property (including certain types of mortgage-backed securities), interest on mortgage loans secured by both real and personal property if the fair market value of such personal property does not exceed 15% of the total fair market value of all property securing the loans, and gains from the sale of real estate assets, or (2) certain kinds of temporary investment of new capital. Second, at least 95% of our gross income in each taxable year, excluding gross income from prohibited transactions, must derive from some combination of such income from investments in real property and temporary investment of new capital (that is, income that qualifies under the 75% income test described above), as well as other dividends, interest, and gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities, which need not have any relation to real property. Income from debt instruments issued by publicly offered REITs is qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test, but is not qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test unless such debt instruments would otherwise be treated as real estate assets.
From time to time, we enter into transactions, such as interest rate swaps, that hedge our risk with respect to one or more of our assets or liabilities. Any income we derive from “hedging transactions” entered into prior to July 31, 2008, will be nonqualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Income from “hedging transactions” that are clearly identified in the manner specified by the Code will not constitute gross income, and will not be counted, for purposes of the 75% gross income test if entered into by us on or after July 31, 2008, and will not constitute gross income, and will not be counted, for purposes of the 95% gross income test if entered into by us on or after January 1, 2005. The term “hedging transaction,” as used above, generally means any transaction into which we enter in the normal course of our business primarily to manage risk of interest rate changes or fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made by us in order to acquire or carry real estate assets. Certain income from hedging transactions to hedge existing hedging positions after any portion of the hedged indebtedness or property is disposed of will also be disregarded for purposes of the 95% and 75% gross income tests. We intend to structure our hedging activities in a manner that does not jeopardize our status as a REIT.
For purposes of satisfying the 75% and 95% gross income tests, “rents from real property” generally include rents from interests in real property, charges for services customarily furnished or rendered in connection with the rental of real property (whether or not such charges are separately stated), and rent attributable to personal property which is leased under, or in connection with, a lease of real property. However, the inclusion of these items as rents from real property is subject to the conditions described immediately below.
Any amount received or accrued, directly or indirectly, with respect to any real or personal property cannot be based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person from such property. However, an amount received or accrued generally will not be excluded from rents from real property solely by reason of being based on a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or sales. In addition, amounts received or accrued based on income or profits do not include amounts received from a tenant based on the tenant’s income from the property if the tenant derives substantially all of its income with respect to such property from leasing or subleasing substantially all of such property, provided that the tenant receives from subtenants only amounts that would be treated as rents from real property if received directly by the REIT.
Amounts received from a tenant generally will not qualify as rents from real property in satisfying the gross income tests if the REIT directly, indirectly, or constructively owns, (1) in the case of a tenant which is a corporation, 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote or 10% or more of the total value of shares of all classes of stock of such tenant, or (2) in the case of a tenant which is not a corporation, an interest of 10% or more in the assets or net profits of such tenant. (Such a tenant is referred to in this section as a “Related Party Tenant.”) Rents that we receive from a Related Party Tenant that is also a TRS of ours, however, will not be excluded from the definition of “rents from real property” if at least 90% of the space at the property to which the rents relate is leased to third parties, and the rents paid by the TRS are substantially comparable to rents paid by our other tenants for comparable space. Whether rents paid by our TRS are substantially comparable to rents paid by our other tenants is determined at the time the lease with the TRS is entered into, extended, and modified, if such modification increases the rents due under such lease.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if a lease with a “controlled” TRS is modified and such modification results in an increase in the rents payable by such TRS, any such increase will not qualify as rents from real property. For purposes of this rule, a “controlled” TRS is a TRS in which we own stock possessing more than 50% of the voting power or more than 50% of the total value.
If rent attributable to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property is greater than 15% of the total rent received under the lease, then the portion of rent attributable to such personal property will not qualify as rents from real property. The determination of whether more than 15% of the rents received by a REIT from a property is attributable to personal property is based upon a comparison of the fair market value of the personal property leased by the tenant to the fair market value of all the property leased by the tenant.
Rents from real property do not include any amount received or accrued directly or indirectly by a REIT for services furnished or rendered to tenants of a property or for managing or operating a property, unless the services furnished or rendered, or management or operations provided, are of a type that a tax-exempt organization can provide to its tenants without causing its rental income to be unrelated business taxable income under the Code (that is, unless they are of a type “usually or customarily rendered in connection with the rental of space for occupancy only” or are not considered “primarily for the tenant’s convenience”). Services, management, or operations which, if provided by a tax-exempt organization, would give rise to unrelated business taxable income (referred to in this section as “Impermissible Tenant Services”) will not be treated as provided by the REIT if provided by either an “independent contractor” (as defined in the Code) who is adequately compensated and from whom the REIT does not derive any income, or by a TRS. If an amount received or accrued by a REIT for providing Impermissible Tenant Services to tenants of a property exceeds 1% of all amounts received or accrued by the REIT with respect to such property in any year, none of such amounts will constitute rents from real property. For purposes of this test, the income received from Impermissible Tenant Services is deemed to be at least 150% of the direct cost of providing the services. If the 1% threshold is not exceeded, only the amounts received for providing Impermissible Tenant Services will not constitute rents from real property.
Substantially all of our income derives from the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership’s income derives largely from rent attributable to our properties (which properties are referred to in this section as the “Properties”). The Operating Partnership also derives income from its TRSs insofar as they pay dividends on shares owned by the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership does not, and is not expected to, charge rent that is based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person (but does charge rent based on a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or sales). The Operating Partnership does not, and is not anticipated to, derive rent attributable to personal property leased in connection with real property that exceeds 15% of the total rent for such property.
In addition, we do not believe that we derive (through the Operating Partnership) rent from a Related Party Tenant. However, the determination of whether we own 10% or more (as measured by either voting power or value) of any tenant is made after the application of complex attribution rules under which we will be treated as owning interests in tenants that are owned by our “Ten Percent Shareholders.” In identifying our Ten Percent Shareholders, each individual or entity will be treated as owning shares held by related individuals and entities. Accordingly, we cannot be absolutely certain whether all Related Party Tenants have been or will be identified. Although rent derived from a Related Party Tenant will not qualify as rents from real property and, therefore, will not be qualifying income under the 75% or 95% gross income test, we believe that the aggregate amount of any such rental income (together with any other nonqualifying income) in any taxable year will not cause us to exceed the limits on nonqualifying income under such gross income tests.
The Operating Partnership provides certain services with respect to the Properties (and expects to provide such services with respect to any newly acquired properties) through certain TRSs. Because the services are provided through our TRSs, the provision of such services will not cause the amounts received by us (through our ownership interest in the Operating Partnership) with respect to the Properties to fail to qualify as rents from real property for purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests.
We may (through one or more pass-through subsidiaries) indirectly receive distributions from TRSs or other corporations that are neither REITs nor qualified REIT subsidiaries. These distributions will be classified as dividend income to the extent of the earnings and profits of the distributing corporation. Such distributions will generally constitute qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test, but not for purposes of the 75% gross income test.
In sum, our investment in real properties through the Operating Partnership and the provision of services with respect to those properties through TRSs, gives and will give rise mostly to rental income qualifying under the 75% and 95% gross income tests. Gains on sales of such properties, or of our interest in such properties or in the Operating Partnership, will generally qualify under the 75% and 95% gross income tests. We anticipate that income on our other investments will not result in our failing the 75% or 95% gross income test for any year.
If we fail to satisfy one or both of the 75% and 95% gross income tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for such year if we are entitled to relief under certain provisions of the Code. We may avail ourselves of the relief provisions if: (1) following our identification of the failure to meet the 75% or 95% gross income test for any taxable year, we file a schedule with the IRS setting forth each item of our gross income for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income test for such taxable year in accordance with Treasury Regulations to be issued; and (2) our failure to meet the test was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. It is not possible, however, to state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions. As discussed above in “— Taxation of REITs in General,” even if these relief provisions apply, a tax would be imposed with respect to the excess nonqualifying gross income.
Asset Tests
At the close of each calendar quarter of our taxable year, we must also satisfy the following four tests relating to the nature of our assets. For purposes of each of these tests, our assets are deemed to include the assets of any disregarded subsidiary and our share of the assets of any subsidiary partnership, such as the Operating Partnership.
At least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented by some combination of “real estate assets,” cash, cash items, U.S. government securities, and, under some circumstances, stock or debt instruments purchased with new capital. For this purpose, “real estate assets” include interests in real property, such as land, buildings, leasehold interests in real property, stock of corporations that qualify as REITs, some kinds of mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans, anddebt instruments issued by publicly offered REITs, personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property to the extent that rent attributable to such personal property meets the 15% test described above to qualify as “rents from real property” for purposes of the 75% income test, and debt secured by a mortgage on both real and personal property if the fair market value of the personal property securing the debt does not exceed 15% of the total fair market value of all property securing the debt.
The aggregate value of all securities of TRSs we hold may not exceed 20% of the value of our total assets.
The value of any one issuer’s securities owned by us may not exceed 5% of the value of our assets. This asset test does not apply to securities of TRSs or to any security that qualifies as a “real estate asset.”
We may not own more than 10% of any one issuer’s outstanding securities, as measured by either voting power or value. This asset test does not apply to securities of TRSs or to any security that qualifies as a “real estate asset.” In addition, solely for purposes of the 10% value test, certain types of securities, including certain “straight debt” securities, are disregarded.
No more than 25% of the value of our assets can consist of debt instruments of publicly offered REITs unless they would otherwise be treated as real estate assets.
No securities issued by a corporation or partnership will qualify as “straight debt” if we own (or a TRS in which we own a greater than 50% interest, as measured by vote or value owns) other securities of such issuer that represent more than 1% of the total value of all securities of such issuer.
Debt instruments issued by a partnership that do not qualify as “straight debt” are (1) not subject to the 10% value test to the extent of our interest as a partner in that partnership and (2) completely excluded from the 10% value test if at least 75% of the partnership’s gross income (excluding income from “prohibited transactions”) consists of income qualifying under the 75% gross income test. In addition, the 10% value test does not apply to (1) any loan made to an individual or an estate, (2) certain rental agreements in which one or more payments are to be made in subsequent years (other than agreements between us and certain persons related to us), (3) any obligation to pay rents from real property, (4) securities issued by governmental entities that are not dependent in whole or in part on the profits of (or payments made by) a non-governmental entity, and (5) any security issued by another REIT.
We are deemed to own, for purposes of the 10% value test, the securities held by a partnership based on our proportionate interest in any securities issued by the partnership (excluding “straight debt” and the securities described in the last sentence of the preceding paragraph). Thus, our proportionate share is not based solely on our capital interest in the partnership but also includes our interest in certain debt securities issued by the partnership.
After meeting the asset tests at the close of any quarter, we will not lose our status as a REIT for failure to satisfy the asset tests at the end of a later quarter solely by reason of changes in asset values. If the failure to satisfy the asset tests results from an acquisition of securities or other property during a quarter, the failure can be cured by a disposition of sufficient nonqualifying assets within 30 days after the close of that quarter. We believe that we maintain adequate records with respect to the nature and value of our assets to enable us to comply with the asset tests and to enable us to take such action within 30 days after the close of any quarter as may be required to cure any noncompliance. There can be no assurance, however, that we will always successfully take such action.
Certain relief provisions may be available to us if we discover a failure to satisfy the asset tests described above after the 30-day cure period. Under these provisions, we will be deemed to have met the 5% and 10% asset tests if the value of our nonqualifying assets (1) does not exceed the lesser of (a) 1% of the total value of our assets at the end of the applicable quarter or (b) $10,000,000 and (2) we dispose of the nonqualifying assets or otherwise satisfy such tests within (a) six months after the last day of the quarter in which the failure to satisfy the asset tests is discovered or (b) the period of time prescribed by Treasury Regulations to be issued. For violations of any asset tests due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect and that are, in the case of the 5% and 10% asset tests, in excess of the de minimis exception described in the preceding sentence, we may avoid disqualification as a REIT after the 30-day cure period by taking steps including (1) the disposition of sufficient nonqualifying assets or the taking of other actions that allow us to meet the asset tests within (a) six months after the last day of the quarter in which the failure to satisfy the asset tests is discovered or (b) the period of time prescribed by Treasury Regulations to be issued, (2) paying a tax equal to the greater of (a) $50,000 or (b) the highest corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the nonqualifying assets, and (3) disclosing certain information to the IRS. Although we believe that we have satisfied the asset tests described above and plan to take steps to ensure that we satisfy such tests for any calendar quarter with respect to which re-testing is to occur, there can be no assurance that we will always be successful or that a reduction in our overall interest in an issuer (including a TRS) will not be required. If we fail to cure any noncompliance with the asset tests in a timely manner and the relief provisions described above are not available, we would cease to qualify as a REIT. See “— Failure to Qualify” below.
We believe that our holdings of securities and other assets have complied and will continue to comply with the foregoing REIT asset requirements, and we intend to monitor compliance on an ongoing basis. No independent appraisals have been obtained, however, to support our conclusions as to the value of our total assets, or the value of any particular security or securities. Moreover, values of some assets may not be susceptible to a precise determination, and values are subject to change in the future. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not contend that we fail to meet the REIT asset requirements by reason of our interests in our subsidiaries or in the securities of other issuers or for some other reason.
Annual Distribution Requirement
To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required to distribute dividends (other than capital gain dividends) to our shareholders each year in an amount at least equal to: (1) the sum of (a) 90% of our
“REIT taxable income” (which is our taxable income exclusive of net income from foreclosure property, and with certain other adjustments) but computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain, and (b) 90% of the excess of our net income, if any, from “foreclosure property” (described below) over the tax imposed on that income; minus (2) the sum of certain items of non-cash income.
These distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if the distributions are declared before we timely file our tax return for the taxable year to which they relate, the distributions are paid on or before the first regular dividend payment after such declaration, and we make an election to treat the distributions as relating to the prior taxable year. In order for distributions to be counted for this purpose, and to give rise to a tax deduction by us, they must not be “preferential dividends.” A dividend is not a preferential dividend if it is pro rata among all outstanding shares within a particular class, and is in accordance with the preferences among different classes of shares as set forth in our organizational documents. Tthe preferential dividend rules do not apply to “publicly offered REITs”. A “publicly offered REIT” means a REIT that is required to file annual and periodic reports with the SEC under the Exchange Act. We are a publicly offered REIT. In addition, any dividend we declare in October, November, or December of any year and payable to a shareholder of record on a specified date in any such month will be treated as both paid by us and received by the shareholder on December 31 of such year, provided that we actually pay the dividend before the end of January of the following calendar year.
To the extent that we distribute at least 90%, but less than 100%, of our “REIT taxable income” (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and with certain adjustments), we will be subject to tax at ordinary corporate rates on the retained portion. We may elect to retain, rather than distribute, our net long-term capital gains and pay tax on such gains. In this case, we could elect to have our shareholders include their proportionate share of such undistributed long-term capital gains in income, and to receive a corresponding credit for their share of the tax we paid. Our shareholders would then increase the adjusted basis of their shares by the difference between the designated amounts included in their long-term capital gains and the tax deemed paid with respect to their shares.
Net operating losses that we are allowed to carry forward from prior tax years may reduce the amount of distributions that we must make in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements. Such losses, however, will generally not affect the character, in the hands of the shareholders, of any distributions that are actually made by us, which are generally taxable to the shareholders as dividends to the extent that we have current or accumulated earnings and profits. See “Federal Income Taxation of Shareholders — Federal Income Taxation of Taxable Domestic Shareholders — Distributions” below.
If we fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of: (1) 85% of our “REIT ordinary income” (i.e., “REIT taxable income” excluding capital gain and without regard to the dividends paid deduction) for that year; (2) 95% of our REIT capital gain net income for that year; and (3) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, we would be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such sum over the aggregate of amounts actually distributed and retained amounts on which income tax is paid at the corporate level. We believe that we have made, and intend to continue to make, distributions in such a manner so as not to be subject to the 4% excise tax.
We intend to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy the annual distribution requirement. In this regard, the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership provides that we, as general partner, must use our best efforts to cause the Operating Partnership to distribute to its partners amounts sufficient to permit us to meet this distribution requirement. It is possible that, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet the 90% distribution requirement, as a result of timing differences between the actual receipt of cash (including distributions from the Operating Partnership) and actual payment of expenses on the one hand, and the inclusion of such income and deduction of such expenses in computing our “REIT taxable income” on the other hand. To avoid any failure to comply with the 90% distribution requirement, we will closely monitor the relationship between our “REIT taxable income” and cash flow, and if necessary, will borrow funds (or cause the Operating Partnership or other affiliates to borrow funds) in order to satisfy the distribution requirement.
Under certain circumstances, we may be able to cure a failure to meet the distribution requirement for a year by paying “deficiency dividends” to shareholders in a later year, which may be included in our deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year. Thus, we may be able to avoid both losing our REIT status and being taxed on amounts distributed as deficiency dividends. We will be required to pay interest, however, based upon the amount of any deduction taken for deficiency dividends.
Failure to Qualify
Specified cure provisions are available to us in the event that we violate a provision of the Code that would otherwise result in our failure to qualify as a REIT. Except with respect to violations of the REIT income tests and asset tests (for which the cure provisions are described above), and provided the violation is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, these cure provisions impose a $50,000 penalty for each violation in lieu of a loss of REIT status. If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year, and the relief provisions do not apply, we will be subject to tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Distributions to shareholders in any year in which we fail to qualify will not be deductible by us, nor will they be required to be made. In such event, to the extent of current and accumulated earnings and profits, all distributions to shareholders will be taxable as dividends and, subject to certain limitations in the Code, corporate distributees may be eligible for the dividends received deduction. Unless entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, we will also be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of termination of our REIT status. It is not possible to state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to this statutory relief.
Prohibited Transactions
Net income derived from a “prohibited transaction” is subject to a 100% excise tax. The term “prohibited transaction” includes a sale or other disposition of property (other than foreclosure property) that is held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. The Operating Partnership owns interests in real property that is situated on the periphery of certain of the Properties. We and the Operating Partnership believe that this peripheral property is not held primarily for sale to customers and that the sale of such peripheral property will not be in the ordinary course of the Operating Partnership’s business. We intend to conduct our operations so that no asset owned by us or our pass-through subsidiaries will be held primarily for sale to customers, and that a sale of any such asset will not be a prohibited transaction subject to the 100% excise tax. Whether property is held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our business depends, however, on the facts and circumstances as they exist from time to time, including those relating to a particular property. As a result, no assurance can be given that the IRS will not recharacterize property we own as property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our business, or that we can comply with certain safe-harbor provisions of the Code that would prevent such treatment. In the event we determine that a property, the ultimate sale of which is expected to result in taxable gain, will be regarded as held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of trade or business, we intend to cause such property to be acquired by or transferred to a TRS so that gain from such sale will be subject to regular corporate income tax as discussed above under “— Effect of Subsidiary Entities — Taxable Subsidiaries.”
Foreclosure Property
Foreclosure property is real property and any personal property incident to such real property (1) that is acquired by a REIT as the result of the REIT’s having bid in the property at foreclosure, or having otherwise reduced the property to ownership or possession by agreement or process of law, after there was a default (or default was imminent) on a lease of the property or on a mortgage loan held by the REIT and secured by the property, (2) the loan or lease related to which was acquired by the REIT at a time when default was not imminent or anticipated, and (3) that such REIT makes a proper election to treat as foreclosure property. REITs are subject to tax at the maximum corporate rate (currently 35%) on any net income from foreclosure property, including any gain from the disposition of the foreclosure property, other than income that would otherwise be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Any gain from the sale of property for which a foreclosure property election has been made will not be subject to the 100% excise tax on gains from prohibited transactions described above, even if the property would otherwise constitute dealer property (i.e., property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business) in the hands of the selling REIT. A TRS may operate property on which a REIT has made a foreclosure property election without loss of foreclosure property status.
Redetermined Rents, Redetermined Deductions, Excess Interest, and Redetermined TRS Service Income
Any redetermined rents, redetermined deductions, or excess interest we generate will be subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, redetermined rents are rents from real property that are overstated as a result of services furnished by a TRS to any of our tenants, and redetermined deductions and excess interest represent amounts that are deducted by a TRS for amounts paid to us that are in excess of the amounts that would have been charged based on arm’s length negotiations. Under “safe harbor” provisions of the Code, rents we receive from tenants of a property will not constitute redetermined rents (by reason of the performance of services by any TRS to such tenants) if:
· | So much of such amounts as constitutes impermissible tenant service income does not exceed 1% of all amounts received or accrued during the year with respect to the property; |
· | The TRS renders a significant amount of similar services to unrelated parties and the charges for such services are substantially comparable; |
· | Rents paid by tenants leasing at least 25% of the net leasable space in the property who are not receiving services from the TRS are substantially comparable to the rents paid by tenants leasing comparable space who are receiving such services from the TRS and the charge for the services is separately stated; or |
· | The TRS’s gross income from the service is not less than 150% of the subsidiary’s direct cost in furnishing the service. |
Any redetermined TRS service income will also be subject to a 100% penalty tax. Redetermined TRS service income is income of a TRS attributable to services provided to, or on behalf of, us (other than services furnished or rendered to a tenant of ours) to the extent such income is lower than the income the TRS would have earned based on arm’s length negotiations.
Tax Aspects of Investment in the Operating Partnership
General
We hold a direct interest in the Operating Partnership, which is classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. The Operating Partnership, together with any entities treated as partnerships for federal income tax purposes that we hold an interest in, are referred to as the “Partnerships.” In general, partnerships are “pass-through” entities that are not subject to federal income tax. Rather, partners are allocated their proportionate shares of the items of income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit of a partnership, and are potentially subject to tax thereon, without regard to whether the partners receive a distribution from the partnership. We will include our proportionate share of the foregoing partnership items in computing our “REIT taxable income.” See “Taxation of the Company — Income Tests” above. Any resultant increase in our “REIT taxable income” will increase the amount we must distribute to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement (see “Taxation of the Company — Annual Distribution Requirement” above) but will generally not be subject to federal income tax in our hands provided that we distribute such income to our shareholders.
Entity Classification
Our interests in the Partnerships involve special tax considerations, including the possibility of a challenge by the IRS to the status of the Operating Partnership or any other Partnership as a partnership (as opposed to an association taxable as a corporation) for federal income tax purposes. In general, under certain Treasury Regulations which became effective January 1, 1997 (referred to in this section as the “Check-the-Box Regulations”), an unincorporated entity with at least two members may elect to be classified either as a corporation or as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. If such an entity does not make an election, it generally will be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. For such an entity that was in existence prior to January 1, 1997, such as the Operating Partnership and some of the Partnerships, the entity will have the same classification (unless it elects otherwise) that it claimed under the rules in effect prior to the Check-the-Box Regulations. In addition, the federal income tax classification of an entity that was in existence prior to January 1, 1997 will be respected for all periods prior to January 1, 1997 if (1) the entity had a reasonable basis for its claimed classification, (2) the entity and all members of the entity recognized the federal income tax consequences of any changes in the entity’s classification within the 60 months prior to January 1, 1997, and (3) neither the entity nor any member of the entity was notified in writing by a taxing authority on or before May 8, 1996 that the classification of the entity was under examination. We believe that the Operating Partnership and any other partnerships in which we previously directly or indirectly held an interest that existed prior to January 1, 1997 reasonably claimed partnership classification under the Treasury Regulations relating to entity classification in effect prior to January 1, 1997, and such classification should be respected for federal income tax purposes. Each of them intends to continue to be classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, and none of them intends to elect to be treated as an association taxable as a corporation under the Check-the-Box Regulations.
If the Operating Partnership or any of the other Partnerships were to be treated as an association, it would be taxable as a corporation and therefore subject to an entity-level tax on its income. In such a situation, the character of our assets and items of gross income would change, which would likely preclude us from satisfying the asset tests and possibly the income tests (see “Taxation of the Company — Income Tests” and “Taxation of the Company — Asset Tests” above), and in turn would prevent us from qualifying as a REIT, unless we were eligible for relief under the relief provisions described above. See “Taxation of the Company — Failure to Qualify” above for discussion of the effect of our failure to satisfy the REIT tests for a taxable year. In addition, any change in the status of any of the Partnerships for federal income tax purposes might be treated as a taxable event, in which case we could have taxable income that is subject to the REIT distribution requirement without receiving any cash.
Tax Allocations with Respect to the Properties
Pursuant to Section 704(c) of the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations, income, gain, loss, and deduction attributable to appreciated or depreciated property that is contributed to a partnership in exchange for an interest in the partnership (such as the Properties contributed to the Operating Partnership by the limited partners of the Operating Partnership) must be allocated in such a manner that the contributing partner is charged with, or benefits from, the unrealized gain or unrealized loss, respectively, associated with the property at the time of the contribution. The amount of such unrealized gain or unrealized loss is equal to the difference between the fair market value of the contributed property at the time of contribution and the adjusted tax basis of such property at the time of contribution (referred to in this section as the “Book-Tax Difference”). Such allocations are solely for federal income tax purposes and do not affect the book capital accounts or other economic or legal arrangements among the partners. The Operating Partnership was formed with contributions of appreciated property (including the Properties contributed by the limited partners of the Operating Partnership). Consequently, the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement requires allocations to be made in a manner consistent with Section 704(c) of the Code and the applicable Treasury Regulations. If a partner contributes cash to a partnership at a time when the partnership holds appreciated (or depreciated) property, the applicable Treasury Regulations provide for a similar allocation of these items to the other (that is, the pre-existing) partners. These rules may apply to any contribution by us to the Partnerships of cash proceeds received from offerings of our securities, including any offering of common shares, preferred shares, or warrants contemplated by the Prospectus.
In general, the partners that contributed appreciated Properties to the Operating Partnership will be allocated less depreciation, and increased taxable gain on sale, of such Properties. This will tend to eliminate the Book-Tax Difference. However, the special allocation rules of Section 704(c) and the applicable Treasury Regulations do not always rectify the Book-Tax Difference on an annual basis or with respect to a specific taxable transaction such as a sale. Under the applicable Treasury Regulations, special allocations of income and gain and depreciation deductions must be made on a property-by-property basis. Depreciation deductions resulting from the carryover basis of a contributed property are used to eliminate the Book-Tax Difference by allocating such deductions to the non-contributing partners (for example, to us) up to the amount of their share of book depreciation. Any remaining tax depreciation for the contributed property would be allocated to the partners who contributed the property. The Operating Partnership has generally elected the “traditional method” of rectifying the Book-Tax Difference under the applicable Treasury Regulations, pursuant to which if depreciation deductions are less than the non-contributing partners’ share of book depreciation, then the non-contributing partners lose the benefit of the tax deductions to the extent of the difference. When the property is sold, the resulting tax gain is used to the extent possible to eliminate any remaining Book-Tax Difference. Under the traditional method, it is possible that the carryover basis of the contributed assets in the hands of a Partnership may cause us to be allocated less depreciation and other deductions than would otherwise be allocated to us. This may cause us to recognize taxable income in excess of cash proceeds, which might adversely affect our ability to comply with the REIT distribution requirement. See “Taxation of the Company — Annual Distribution Requirement” above.
With respect to property purchased by (and not contributed to) a Partnership, such property will initially have a tax basis equal to its fair market value, and Section 704(c) of the Code and the applicable Treasury Regulations will not apply unless such property is subsequently revalued for capital accounting purposes under applicable Treasury Regulations.
Sale of the Properties
The Operating Partnership intends to hold the Properties for investment with a view to long-term appreciation, to engage in the business of acquiring, developing, owning, and operating the Properties and other shopping centers and to make such occasional sales of the Properties as are consistent with our investment objectives. We do not currently hold any Properties through any Partnerships other than the Operating Partnership. Based primarily on such investment objectives, we believe that the Properties should not be considered dealer property (i.e., property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business). Whether property is dealer property is a question of fact that depends on the particular facts and circumstances with respect to the particular transaction. No assurance can be given that any property sold by us or any of our Partnerships will not be dealer property, or that we can comply with certain safe-harbor provisions of the Code that would prevent such treatment. Our share of any gain realized by the Operating Partnership or any other Partnerships on the sale of any dealer property generally will be treated as income from a prohibited transaction that is subject to a 100% penalty tax. See “Taxation of the Company — Prohibited Transactions” above. In the event we determine that a property, the ultimate sale of which is expected to result in taxable gain, will be held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business, we intend to cause such property to be acquired by or transferred to a TRS so that gain from such sale will be subject to regular corporate income tax as discussed above under “— Effect of Subsidiary Entities — Taxable Subsidiaries.”
Partnership Audit Rules
Pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, if the IRS makes audit adjustments to the income tax returns of the Operating Partnership or any other Partnership, it may assess and collect any taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustment directly from the Operating Partnership or such other Partnership. The Operating Partnership or any other Partnership may elect to have its partners take such audit adjustment into account in accordance with their interests in the Operating Partnership or such other Partnership during the tax year under audit, but there can be no assurance that such election will be effective in all circumstances. If, as a result of any such audit adjustment, the Operating Partnership or any other Partnership is required to make payments of taxes, penalties and interest, the cash available for distribution to its partners might be substantially reduced. These rules are not applicable for tax years beginning on or prior to December 31, 2017 (unless the Operating Partnership or other Partnership elects for these rules to apply on an earlier date, which the Operating Partnership and any other Partnerships do not expect to make).
Federal Income Taxation of Shareholders
As used herein, a “taxable domestic shareholder” means a beneficial owner of our shares or warrants, who is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
· | a citizen or individual resident of the U.S. as defined in section 7701(b) of the Code; | |
· | a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia; | |
· | an estate the income of which is subject federal income taxation regardless of its source; or | |
· | a trust if it (a) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the U.S. and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (b) was in existence on August 20, 1996 and has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person. |
If a partnership, including for this purpose any entity treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, holds stock or warrants issued by us, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership.
This summary assumes that investors will hold their securities as capital assets, which generally means assets held for investment.
Federal Income Taxation of Taxable Domestic Shareholders
Distributions. As a result of our status as a REIT, distributions made to our taxable domestic shareholders out of current or accumulated earnings and profits, and not designated as capital gain dividends, will generally be taken into account by them as ordinary income and will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporations. However, for taxable years prior to 2026, generally individual stockholders are allowed to deduct 20% of the aggregate amount of ordinary dividends distributed by us, subject to certain limitations, which would reduce the maximum marginal effective tax rate for individuals on the receipt of such ordinary dividends to 29.6%. The maximum federal income tax rate applicable to corporations is 21% and that applicable to ordinary income of individuals is currently 37%.
The maximum individual rate of tax on dividends and long-term capital gains is generally 20%. Because we are not generally subject to federal income tax on the portion of our REIT taxable income or capital gains distributed to our shareholders, our dividends are generally not eligible for this 20% tax rate on dividends. As a result, our ordinary REIT dividends will continue to be taxed at the higher tax rates applicable to ordinary income. However, the 20% tax rate will generally apply to:
· | our dividends attributable to dividends received by us from non-REIT corporations, such as TRSs; |
· | our dividends attributable to our REIT taxable income in the prior taxable year on which we were subject to corporate level income tax (net of the amount of such tax); and |
· | our dividends attributable to income in the prior taxable year from the sale of appreciated (i.e., Built-in Gain) property acquired by us from “C” corporations in carryover basis transactions or held by us on the first day of a taxable year for which we first re-qualify as a REIT after being subject to tax as a “C” corporation for more than two years (net of the amount of corporate tax on such income). |
Distributions that are designated as capital gain dividends will be taxed to shareholders as long-term capital gains, to the extent that they do not exceed our actual net capital gain for the taxable year, without regard to the period for which the shareholder has held its shares. A similar treatment will apply to long-term capital gains we retain, to the extent that we elect the application of provisions of the Code that treat shareholders of a REIT as having received, for federal income tax purposes, undistributed capital gains of the REIT, while passing through to shareholders a corresponding credit for taxes paid by the REIT on such retained capital gains. The aggregate amount of dividends that we may designate as qualified dividend income or as capital gain dividends cannot exceed the dividends actually paid by us during such year. In addition, the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to prescribe regulations or other guidance requiring proportionality of the designation of particular types of dividends. Corporate shareholders may be required to treat up to 20% of some capital gain dividends as ordinary income. Long-term capital gains are generally taxable at maximum federal rates of 20% in the case of shareholders who are individuals, and 35% for corporations. Capital gains attributable to the sale of depreciable real property held for more than 12 months are subject to a 25% maximum federal income tax rate for taxpayers who are individuals, to the extent of previously claimed depreciation deductions. Pursuant to Treasury Regulations to be promulgated by the U.S. Treasury Department, a portion of our distributions may be subject to the alternative minimum tax to the extent of our items of tax preference, if any, allocated to the shareholders.
Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits will not be taxable to a shareholder to the extent that they do not exceed the adjusted basis of the shareholder’s common or preferred shares in respect of which the distributions were made, but rather, will reduce the adjusted basis of those common or preferred shares. To the extent that such distributions exceed the adjusted basis of a shareholder’s shares, they will be included in income as long-term capital gain, or short-term capital gain if the shares have been held for one year or less. In addition, any dividend we declare in October, November or December of any year and payable to a shareholder of record on a specified date in any such month will be treated both as paid by us and received by the shareholder on December 31 of such year, provided that we actually pay the dividend before the end of January of the following calendar year.
We may make distributions to shareholders paid in common or preferred shares that are intended to be treated as dividends for federal income tax purposes. In that event, our shareholders would generally have taxable income with respect to such distributions of our common or preferred shares and may have tax liability by reason of such distributions in excess of the cash (if any) that is received by them.
In determining the extent to which a distribution with respect to our shares constitutes a dividend for tax purposes, our earnings and profits will be allocated first to distributions with respect to our preferred shares and then to our common shares. In addition, the IRS has taken the position in published guidance that if a REIT has two classes of shares, the amount of any particular type of income (including net capital gain) allocated to each class in any year cannot exceed such class’s proportionate share of such income based on the total dividends paid to each class for such year. Consequently, if both common shares and preferred shares are outstanding, particular types of income will be allocated in accordance with the classes’ proportionate shares of such income. Thus, net capital gain will be allocated between holders of common shares and holders of preferred shares, if any, in proportion to the total dividends paid to each class during the taxable year, or otherwise as required by applicable law.
Net operating losses and capital losses that we are allowed to carry forward from prior tax years may reduce the amount of distributions that we must make in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements. See “Taxation of the Company — Annual Distribution Requirement” above. Such losses, however, are not passed through to our shareholders and do not offset income of shareholders from other sources, nor do they affect the character of any distributions that we actually make, which are generally taxable to our shareholders as dividends to the extent that we have current or accumulated earnings and profits.
We will be treated as having sufficient earnings and profits for a year to treat as a dividend any distribution we make for such year up to the amount required to be distributed in order to avoid imposition of the 4% federal excise tax discussed in “Taxation of the Company — Taxation of REITs in General” above. As a result, taxable domestic shareholders may be required to treat certain distributions as taxable dividends even though we may have no overall, accumulated earnings and profits. Moreover, any “deficiency dividend,” which is a dividend to our current shareholders that is permitted to relate back to a year for which the IRS determines a deficiency in order to satisfy the distribution requirement for that year, will be treated as a dividend (an ordinary dividend or a capital gain dividend, as the case may be) regardless of our earnings and profits for the year in which we pay the deficiency dividend.
Certain domestic non-corporate taxpayers may also be subject to an additional tax of 3.8% with respect to dividends on our shares of capital stock. See “Material Federal Income Tax Considerations — Federal Income Taxation of Shareholders — Disposition of Common and Preferred Shares — Medicare Tax.”
Disposition of Common and Preferred Shares
In general, capital gains recognized by individuals and other non-corporate shareholders upon the sale or disposition of common or preferred shares will be subject to a maximum federal income tax rate of 20% (applicable to long-term capital gains) if the shares are held for more than 12 months, and will be taxed at rates of up to 37% (applicable to short-term capital gains) if the shares are held for 12 months or less. Gains recognized by shareholders that are corporations are subject to federal income tax at a maximum rate of 21%, whether or not classified as long-term capital gains. Capital losses recognized by a shareholder upon the disposition of shares held for more than one year at the time of disposition will be considered long-term capital losses, which are generally available first to offset long-term capital gain (which is taxed at capital gain rates) and then short-term capital gain (which is taxed at ordinary income rates) of the shareholder, but not ordinary income of the shareholder (except in the case of individuals, who may offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income each year). Capital losses recognized by a shareholder upon the disposition of shares held for not more than one year are considered short-term capital losses and are generally available first to offset short-term capital gain and then long-term capital gain of the shareholder, but not ordinary income of the shareholder (except in the case of individuals, who may offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income each year). In addition, any loss upon a sale or exchange of shares by a shareholder who has held the shares for six months or less, after applying certain holding period rules, will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of distributions received from us that are required to be treated by the shareholder as long-term capital gain.
Certain domestic non-corporate taxpayers may also be subject to an additional tax of 3.8% with respect to capital gains from the disposition of our shares of capital stock. See “Material Federal Income Tax Considerations — Federal Income Taxation of Shareholders — Disposition of Common and Preferred Shares — Medicare Tax.”
If a holder of common or preferred shares recognizes a loss upon a disposition of those shares in an amount that exceeds a prescribed threshold, it is possible that the provisions of certain Treasury Regulations involving “reportable transactions” could apply to require a disclosure filing with the IRS concerning the loss-generating transaction. While these regulations are directed toward “tax shelters,” they are quite broad, and apply to transactions that would not typically be considered tax shelters. The Code imposes significant penalties for failure to comply with these requirements. Prospective shareholders should consult their tax advisors concerning any possible disclosure obligation with respect to the receipt or disposition of common or preferred shares, or transactions that might be undertaken directly or indirectly by us. Moreover, prospective shareholders should be aware that we and other participants in the transactions involving us (including their advisors) might be subject to disclosure or other requirements pursuant to these regulations.
A redemption of preferred shares will be treated under Section 302 of the Code as a dividend subject to tax as such (to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits), unless the redemption satisfies certain tests set forth in Section 302(b) of the Code enabling the redemption to be treated as a sale or exchange of the preferred shares. The redemption will satisfy such test if it (1) is “substantially disproportionate” with respect to the holder (which will not be the case if only preferred shares are redeemed, since preferred shares generally do not have voting rights), (2) results in a “complete termination” of the shareholder’s stock interest in us, or (3) is not “essentially equivalent to a dividend” with respect to the shareholder, all within the meaning of Section 302(b) of the Code. In determining whether any of these tests have been met, shares considered to be owned by the shareholder by reason of certain constructive ownership rules set forth in the Code, as well as shares actually owned, must generally be taken into account. Because the determination as to whether any of the alternative tests of Section 302(b) of the Code is satisfied with respect to any particular holder of preferred shares will depend upon the facts and circumstances as of the time the determination is made, prospective shareholders are advised to consult their own tax advisors to determine such tax treatment.
If a redemption of preferred shares is not treated as a distribution taxable as a dividend to a particular shareholder, it will be treated, as to that shareholder, as a taxable sale or exchange. As a result, such shareholder will recognize gain or loss for federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between (1) the amount of cash and the fair market value of any property received (less any portion thereof attributable to accumulated but unpaid dividends that we are legally obligated to pay at the time of the redemption, which will be taxable as a dividend to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits), and (2) the shareholder’s adjusted basis in the preferred shares for tax purposes. Such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if, at the time of the redemption, the shares were held for more than 12 months.
If a redemption of preferred shares is treated as a distribution that is taxable as a dividend, the amount of the distribution would be measured by the amount of cash and the fair market value of any property received by the shareholder. The shareholder’s adjusted tax basis in the redeemed preferred shares will be transferred to the shareholder’s remaining shares of our capital stock, if any. If, however, the shareholder has no remaining shares of our capital stock, such basis may, under certain circumstances, be transferred to a related person or it may be lost entirely.
Redemption Premium on Preferred Shares. If the redemption price of preferred shares that are subject to redemption exceeds their issue price (such excess referred to in this section as a “redemption premium”), in certain situations the entire amount of the redemption premium will be treated as being distributed to the holder of such shares, on an economic accrual basis, over the period from issuance of such shares until the date the shares are first redeemable (such deemed distribution referred to in this section as a “constructive distribution”). A constructive distribution may occur only if the preferred shares are subject to a redemption premium, and only if (1) we are required to redeem the shares at a specified time, (2) the holder of the shares has the option to require us to redeem the shares, or (3) we have the right to redeem the shares, but only if under applicable regulations, redemption pursuant to that right is more likely than not to occur. See the applicable prospectus supplement for further information regarding the possible tax treatment of redemption premiums with respect to any such preferred shares offered by such prospective supplement.
Passive Activity Loss and Investment Interest Limitations. Taxable dividends that we distribute and gain from the disposition of common or preferred shares will not be treated as passive activity income and, therefore, shareholders subject to the limitation on the use of “passive losses” will not be able to apply passive losses against such income. Shareholders may elect to treat capital gain dividends, capital gains from the disposition of shares and qualified dividend income as investment income for purposes of computing the limitation on the deductibility of investment interest, but in such case the shareholder will be taxed at ordinary income rates on those amounts. Other distributions made by us, to the extent they do not constitute a return of capital, will generally be treated as investment income for purposes of computing the investment interest limitation.
Medicare Tax. Certain domestic shareholders who are individuals, estates or trusts will be required to pay a 3.8% Medicare tax with respect to, inter alia , dividends on and capital gains from the sale or other disposition of stock, subject to certain exceptions. Prospective shareholders should consult their tax advisors regarding the applicability of this tax to any income and gains in respect of an investment in our common or preferred shares.
Convertible Preferred Shares. See the applicable prospectus supplement for a discussion of any additional tax consequences to a domestic shareholder of investing in convertible preferred shares offered by such prospectus supplement.
Federal Income Taxation of Non-U.S. Shareholders
The following is a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of common and preferred shares applicable to “non-U.S. shareholders.” A non-U.S. shareholder is any holder of our shares who is a “foreign person.” For the purposes of this summary, a foreign person is any person that is not a taxable domestic shareholder, tax-exempt entity (which are addressed below), or an entity treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.
The following summary is based on current law and is for general information only. The summary addresses only selected and not all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation. Prospective non-U.S. shareholders should consult with their own tax advisors to determine the impact of U.S. federal, state, and local income tax and estate tax laws with regard to an investment in our shares, including any reporting requirements.
Ordinary Dividends. The portion of dividends received by non-U.S. shareholders payable out of our earnings and profits that are not attributable to our capital gains and that are not effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the non-U.S. shareholder will be subject to U.S. withholding tax at the rate of 30%, unless reduced by treaty.
In general, non-U.S. shareholders will not be considered to be engaged in a U.S. trade or business solely as a result of their ownership of common or preferred shares. In cases where the dividend income from a non-U.S. shareholder’s investment in common or preferred shares is, or is treated as, effectively connected with the non-U.S. shareholder’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business, the non-U.S. shareholder generally will be subject to U.S. income tax at graduated rates, in the same manner as domestic shareholders are taxed with respect to such dividends, and such income generally must be reported on a U.S. federal income tax return filed by or on behalf of the non-U.S. shareholder. Such income may also be subject to the 30% branch profits tax (or lower tax treaty rate, if applicable) in the case of a non-U.S. shareholder that is a corporation.
As described above, we may make distributions paid in common or preferred shares that are intended to be treated as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If we are required to withhold an amount in excess of any cash that is distributed to non-U.S. shareholders along with the common or preferred shares, we may retain and sell some of the common or preferred shares that would otherwise be distributed in order to satisfy any withholding tax imposed on the distribution.
Non-Dividend Distributions. Unless our common or preferred shares constitute a U.S. real property interest (referred to in this section as a “USRPI”), distributions by us that are not dividends out of our earnings and profits will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. If it cannot be determined at the time at which a distribution is made whether or not the distribution will exceed current and accumulated earnings and profits, the entire distribution will be subject to withholding at the rate applicable to dividends. However, the non-U.S. shareholder may seek a refund from the IRS of any amounts withheld if it is subsequently determined that the distribution was, in fact, in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. If our common or preferred shares constitute a USRPI, as discussed below under “— Dispositions of Common or Preferred Shares,” then distributions by us in excess of the sum of our earnings and profits plus the shareholder’s basis in its shares will be taxed under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (which is referred to in this section as “FIRPTA”) at the rate of tax, including any applicable capital gains rates, that would apply to a domestic shareholder of the same type (that is, an individual or a corporation, as the case may be), and the collection of the tax will be enforced by a refundable withholding at a rate of 15% of the amount by which the distribution exceeds the shareholder’s share of our earnings and profits. As discussed below under “— FIRPTA Exception for Qualified Shareholders of REITs” our shares will not be treated as USRPIs when held directly or indirectly by a “qualified shareholder.” Additionally, as discussed below under “— FIRPTA Exception for Interests Held by Foreign Retirement or Pension Funds,” “qualified foreign pension funds” will not be subject to FIRPTA withholding.
Capital Gain Dividends. Distributions that are attributable to gains from dispositions of USRPIs held by us directly or through pass-through subsidiaries (referred to in this section as “USRPI capital gains”) that are paid with respect to any class of shares which is regularly traded on an established securities market located in the United States and that are made to a non-U.S. shareholder who does not own more than 10% of the class of shares at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of distribution will be treated as a regular distribution by us, and these distributions will be treated as ordinary dividend distributions. A distribution of USRPI capital gains made by us to non-U.S. shareholders owning more than 10% of the class of shares in respect of which the distribution is made will be considered effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the non-U.S. shareholder and will be subject to U.S. income tax at the rates applicable to U.S. individuals or corporations, as the case may be (subject to alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals), without regard to whether the distribution is designated as a capital gain dividend. In the case of such a greater than 10% non-U.S. shareholder, we will be required to withhold tax equal to 21% of the amount of dividends to the extent the dividends constitute USRPI capital gains. Distributions subject to FIRPTA may also be subject to a 30% branch profits tax (or lower tax treaty rate, if applicable) in the hands of a non-U.S. shareholder that is a corporation.
Distributions to a non-U.S. shareholder that we properly designate as capital gain dividends, other than those arising from the disposition of a USRPI, generally should not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation unless: (1) the investment in our shares is treated as effectively connected with the non-U.S. shareholder’s U.S. trade or business, in which case the non-U.S. shareholder will be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. shareholder with respect to such gain, except that a non-U.S. shareholder that is a foreign corporation may also be subject to the 30% branch profits tax (or lower tax treaty rate, if applicable), or (2) the non-U.S. shareholder is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and certain other conditions are satisfied, in which case the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual’s capital gains (unless a lower tax treaty rate applies).
Retained Net Capital Gains. Although the law is not clear on the matter, it appears that amounts designated by us as retained capital gains in respect of our shares held by non-U.S. shareholders generally should be treated in the same manner as our actual distributions of capital gain dividends. Under this approach, a non-U.S. shareholder would be able to claim as a credit against its U.S. federal income tax liability, its proportionate share of the tax paid by us on the retained capital gains, and to obtain from the IRS a refund to the extent its proportionate share of the tax paid by us exceeds its actual U.S. federal income tax liability.
Dispositions of Common or Preferred Shares. Unless our common or preferred shares constitute a USRPI, a sale of such shares by a non-U.S. shareholder generally will not be subject to U.S. taxation under FIRPTA. The shares will not constitute a USRPI if we are a “domestically-controlled REIT.”
A REIT is a “domestically-controlled REIT” if throughout the applicable testing period less than 50% of its stock was held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. persons. In the case of a publicly traded REIT, a person holding less than 5% of a publicly traded class of stock at all times during the testing period is treated as a U.S. person unless the REIT has actual knowledge that such person is not a U.S. person. We are a publicly traded REIT. In the case of REIT stock held by a publicly traded REIT or certain publicly traded or open-ended registered investment companies, the REIT or registered investment company will be treated as a U.S. person if the REIT or registered investment company is domestically controlled and will be treated as a non-U.S. person otherwise. In the case of REIT stock held by a REIT or registered investment company not described in the previous rule, the REIT or registered investment company is treated as a U.S. person or a non-U.S. person on a look-through basis. We believe that we are, and we expect to continue to be, a domestically-controlled REIT and, therefore, the sale of our common or preferred shares by non-U.S. shareholders is not expected to be subject to taxation under FIRPTA. Because our shares are publicly traded, however, no assurance can be given that we are or will be a domestically-controlled REIT.
In the event that we do not constitute a domestically-controlled REIT, a non-U.S. shareholder’s sale of common or preferred shares nonetheless will not constitute a USRPI and accordingly would not be subject to tax under FIRPTA as a sale of a USRPI, provided that (1) the shares are of a class that are “regularly traded” as defined by applicable Treasury Regulations, on an established securities market, and (2) the selling non-U.S. shareholder held 10% or less of such class of shares at all times during a prescribed testing period. We believe that our common shares are, and expect them to continue to be, “regularly traded” on an established securities market.
If gain on the sale of common or preferred shares were subject to taxation under FIRPTA, the non-U.S. shareholder would be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. shareholder with respect to such gain, subject to applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of non-resident alien individuals, and the purchaser of the shares could, unless the shares are of a class that are “regularly traded” (as defined by applicable Treasury Regulations) on an established securities market, be required to withhold 15% of the purchase price and remit such amount to the IRS.
Gain from the sale of common or preferred shares that would not be subject to FIRPTA will nonetheless be taxable in the United States to a non-U.S. shareholder in two cases: (1) if the gain is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business conducted by such non-U.S. shareholder and, where a treaty applies, such trade or business is conducted through a permanent establishment in the U.S., then the non-U.S. shareholder will be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. shareholder with respect to such gain, except that the non-U.S. shareholder may also be subject to the 30% branch profits tax (or lower tax treaty rate, if applicable) if it is a foreign corporation, or (2) if the non-U.S. shareholder is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and certain other conditions are satisfied, the nonresident alien individual will be subject to tax on the individual’s capital gain at a 30% rate (or lower tax treaty rate, if applicable).
FIRPTA Exception for Qualified Shareholders of REITs. Stock of a REIT held (directly or through one or more partnerships) by a “qualified shareholder” will not be a USRPI, and capital gain dividends from such a REIT will not be treated as gain from the sale of a USRPI, unless a person (other than a qualified shareholder) that holds an interest (other than an interest solely as a creditor) in such qualified shareholder owns, taking into account applicable constructive ownership rules, more than 10% of the stock of the REIT (an “applicable investor”). If the qualified shareholder has such an applicable investor, gains and REIT distributions allocable to the portion of REIT stock held by the qualified shareholder indirectly owned through the qualified shareholder by the applicable investor will be treated as gains from the sale of USRPIs. For these purposes, a “qualified shareholder” is a foreign person which is in a treaty jurisdiction and satisfies certain publicly traded requirements, is a “qualified collective investment vehicle,” and maintains records on the identity of certain 5% owners. A “qualified collective investment vehicle” is a foreign person that is eligible for a reduced withholding rate with respect to ordinary REIT dividends even if such person holds more than 10% of the REIT’s stock, a publicly traded partnership that is a withholding foreign partnership that would be a United States real property holding corporation if it were a United States corporation, or is designated as a qualified collective investment vehicle by the Secretary of the Treasury and is either fiscally transparent within the meaning of the Code or required to include dividends in its gross income but entitled to a deduction for distributions to its investors. Finally, capital gain dividends and non-dividend redemption and liquidating distributions to a qualified shareholder that are not allocable to an applicable investor will be treated as ordinary dividends. The rules applicable to qualified shareholders are complex and investors who believe that they may be qualified shareholders should consult with their own tax advisor to find out if these rules are applicable to them.
FIRPTA Exception for Interests Held by Foreign Retirement or Pension Funds. “Qualified foreign pension funds” and entities that are wholly owned by a qualified foreign pension fund are exempted from FIRPTA and FIRPTA withholding. For these purposes, a “qualified foreign pension fund” is any trust, corporation, or other organization or arrangement if (i) it was created or organized under foreign law, (ii) it was established to provide retirement or pension benefits to participants or beneficiaries that are current or former employees (or persons designated by such employees) of one or more employers in consideration for services rendered, (iii) it does not have a single participant or beneficiary with a right to more than 5% of its assets or income, (iv) it is subject to government regulation and provides annual information reporting about its beneficiaries to the relevant tax authorities in the country in which it is established or operates, and (v) under the laws of the country in which it is established or operates, either contributions to such fund which would otherwise be subject to tax under such laws are deductible or excluded from the gross income of such fund or taxed at a reduced rate, or taxation of any investment income of such fund is deferred or such income is taxed at a reduced rate. The rules applicable to qualified foreign pension funds are complex and investors who believe that they may be qualified foreign pension funds should consult with their own tax advisor to find out if these rules are applicable to them.
No “Cleansed” REITs. The so-called FIRPTA “cleansing rule” (which applies to corporations that no longer have any USRPIs and have recognized all gain on their USRPIs) will not apply to a REIT or a registered investment company or a corporation if the corporation or any predecessor was a REIT or a registered investment company during the applicable testing period.
Convertible Preferred Shares. See the applicable prospectus supplement for a discussion of any additional tax consequences to a non-U.S. shareholder of investing in convertible preferred shares offered by such prospectus supplement.
Federal Taxation of Tax-Exempt Shareholders
Tax-exempt entities, including qualified employee pension and profit sharing trusts and individual retirement accounts, generally are exempt from federal income taxation. However, they are subject to taxation on their unrelated business taxable income (which is referred to in this section as “UBTI”). While many investments in real estate generate UBTI, the IRS has ruled that dividend distributions from a REIT to a tax-exempt entity do not constitute UBTI. Based on that ruling, and provided that (1) a tax-exempt shareholder has not held its common or preferred shares as “debt financed property” within the meaning of the Code (that is, property the acquisition of which is financed through a borrowing by the tax-exempt shareholder), and (2) the shares are not otherwise used in an unrelated trade or business, we believe that distributions from us and income from the sale of our shares should not give rise to UBTI to a tax-exempt shareholder.
Tax-exempt shareholders that are social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts, and qualified group legal services plans exempt from federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (9), (17) and (20) of the Code, respectively, are subject to different UBTI rules, which generally will require them to characterize distributions from us as UBTI.
A pension trust that owns more than 10% of the value of our shares could be required to treat a percentage of the dividends from us as UBTI if we are a “pension-held REIT.” We will not be a pension-held REIT unless either (1) one pension trust owns more than 25% of the value of our shares, or (2) a group of pension trusts, each individually holding more than 10% of the value of our shares, collectively owns more than 50% of the value of our shares. We believe that we currently are not a pension-held REIT. Because our shares are publicly traded, however, no assurance can be given that we are not (or will not be) a pension-held REIT.
Tax-exempt shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of an investment in our common or preferred shares.
Federal Income Taxation of Warrants
A holder who receives shares upon the exercise of a warrant should not recognize gain or loss except to the extent of any cash received for fractional shares. Except to the extent of any cash so received, such a holder would have a tax basis in the shares acquired pursuant to a warrant equal to the amount of the purchase price paid for (or, if the warrant is purchased as part of an “investment unit,” allocated to) the warrant plus the amount paid for the shares pursuant to the warrant. The holding period for the shares acquired pursuant to a warrant would begin on the date of exercise. Upon the subsequent sale of shares acquired pursuant to a warrant or upon a sale of a warrant, the holder thereof would generally recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale and its tax basis in such shares or warrant, as the case may be. The foregoing assumes that warrants will not be held as a hedge, straddle or as a similar offsetting position with respect to our shares and that Section 1092 of the Code will not apply.
Other Tax Considerations
Information Reporting Requirements and Backup Withholding Tax
Under certain circumstances, holders of our securities may be subject to backup withholding at a rate of 24% (through 2025 and then at 28% thereafter) on payments made with respect to, or cash proceeds of a sale or exchange of, our securities. Backup withholding will apply only if the holder (1) fails to furnish its taxpayer identification number, referred to in this section as a “TIN” (which, for an individual, would be his or her social security number), (2) furnishes an incorrect TIN, (3) is notified by the IRS that it has failed to properly report payments of interest and dividends, or (4) under certain circumstances, fails to certify, under penalty of perjury, that it has not been notified by the IRS that it is subject to backup withholding for failure to report interest and dividend payments. Backup withholding will not apply with respect to payments made to certain exempt recipients, such as corporations and tax-exempt organizations. Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding their qualification for exemption from backup withholding and the procedure for obtaining such an exemption. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the amount of any backup withholding with respect to a payment to a holder of our securities will be allowed as a credit against such holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle such holder to a refund, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS. In addition, we may be required to withhold a portion of capital gain distributions to, or gross proceeds from our redemption of shares or other securities from, any holders who fail to certify their non-foreign status, if applicable.
Additional issues may arise pertaining to information reporting and backup withholding with respect to foreign investors, and foreign investors should consult their tax advisors with respect to any such information reporting and backup withholding requirements. Backup withholding with respect to foreign investors is not an additional tax. Rather, the amount of any backup withholding with respect to a payment to a foreign investor will be allowed as a credit against any U.S. federal income tax liability of such foreign investor. If withholding results in an overpayment of taxes, a refund may be obtained, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.
Additional U.S. Federal Income Tax Withholding Rules — Reporting and Withholding on Foreign Financial Accounts
Withholding taxes may be imposed under Sections 1471 to 1474 of the Code (such sections commonly referred to as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or FATCA) on certain types of payments made to non-U.S. financial institutions and certain other non-U.S. entities. Currently, certain foreign financial institutions and non-financial foreign entities are subject to a 30% U.S. federal withholding tax on dividends on our shares of capital stock unless (i) in the case of a foreign financial institution, such institution enters into an agreement with the U.S. government (or complies with applicable alternative procedures pursuant to an applicable intergovernmental agreement between the U.S. and the relevant foreign government) to withhold on certain payments and to collect and provide to the U.S. tax authorities substantial information regarding U.S. account holders of such institution (which includes certain equity and debt holders of such institution, as well as certain account holders that are foreign entities with U.S. owners), and (ii) in the case of a non-financial foreign entity, such entity provides the withholding agent with a certification identifying the direct and indirect U.S. owners of the entity and complies with certain other applicable reporting obligations. In addition, if such disclosure requirements are not satisfied, withholding at a 30% rate on gross proceeds from the sale or other disposition of our shares of capital stock by such foreign financial institutions and non-financial foreign entities will generally begin after December 31, 2018. Under certain circumstances, a non-U.S. shareholder might be eligible for refunds or credits of such taxes. Prospective investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the possible implications of these withholding provisions on the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our shares of capital stock. We will not pay any additional amounts in respect of any amounts withheld.
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
To the extent that a shareholder receives common shares or preferred shares pursuant to a dividend reinvestment plan, the federal income tax treatment of the shareholder and us will generally be the same as if the distribution had been made in cash. See “Federal Income Taxation of Shareholders” and “Taxation of the Company — Annual Distribution Requirement” above.
Legislative or Other Actions Affecting REITs
The present U.S. federal income tax treatment of REITs may be modified, possibly with retroactive effect, by legislative, judicial or administrative action at any time, which could affect the federal income tax treatment of an investment in us. The REIT rules are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department, which may result in statutory changes as well as revisions to regulations and interpretations. Changes to the U.S. federal tax laws and interpretations thereof could adversely affect an investment in our securities. According to publicly released statements, a top legislative priority of the new Congress and administration may be to enact significant reform of the Code, including significant changes to taxation of business entities and the deductibility of interest expense and capital investment. There is a substantial lack of clarity around the likelihood, timing and details of any such tax reform and the impact of any potential tax reform on us or an investment in our securities.
Any such changes to the tax laws or interpretations thereof, with or without retroactive application, could materially and adversely affect our securityholders or us. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect our stockholders or us. New legislation, U.S. Treasury Regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly and negatively affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT, or the federal income tax consequences to our securityholders and us of such qualification, or could have other adverse consequences, including with respect to ownership of our securities. For example, lower revised tax rates for corporations, or for individuals, trusts and estates, might cause current or potential securityholders to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than is the case under current law. Investors are urged to consult their tax advisors with respect to the status of legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our securities.
State and Local Taxes
We are subject to state, local, or other taxation in various state, local, or other jurisdictions, including those in which we transact business or own property. In addition, a holder of our securities may be subject to state, local, or other taxation on our distributions in various state, local, or other jurisdictions, including the jurisdiction in which the holder resides. The tax treatment in such jurisdictions may differ from the federal income tax consequences discussed above. Consequently, prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect of state, local, and other tax laws on their investment in our securities.
Additional Tax Consequences for Holders of Depositary Shares or Rights
See the applicable prospectus supplement for a discussion of any additional tax consequences for holders of depositary shares or rights offered by such prospectus supplement.