The following selected consolidated financial information was derived from our fiscal year end consolidated financial statements. The following information should be read in conjunction with those statements and Item 5, “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”

Our summary consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income data for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and our summary consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2017 and 2018, as set forth below, are derived from, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, which are included in this Annual Report. Our summary unaudited consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2016, as set forth below, are derived from the financial records of Origin.

We have omitted the selected financial data for the years ended September 30, 2014 and 2015, based on the fact that for us to provide the information reflecting our discontinued operations it would take a significant amount of time and cause us to incur an unreasonable expense. We do not believe that to provide the selected financial data for those years, as adjusted to reflect the discontinued operations would provide any meaningful disclosure for investors, given the extent to which the discontinued operations then represented the majority of the revenue and expenses in those years.

References in this annual report to our ordinary shares are adjusted to reflect the consolidation of our ordinary shares through a one-for-ten reverse stock split, which became effective on July 10, 2018.

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared and presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP.

(1) Translation of Renminbi amounts into United States dollar amounts has been made for the convenience of the reader for the year ended September 30, 2018, and has been made at the exchange rate quoted by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange in China on September 30, 2018, of RMB6.8792 to US$1.00. Such translation amounts should not be construed as a representation that the Renminbi amounts could be readily converted into United States dollar amounts at that rate or any other rate.

(2) Current working capital is the difference between total current assets and total current liabilities.

Exchange Rate Information

The conversion of Renminbi into U.S. dollars in this Annual Report is based on the statistics of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange. The consolidated financial statements are presented in Renminbi, which is our reporting currency. The translation of Renminbi amounts into United States dollar amounts has been made for the convenience of the reader and has been made at the exchange rate quoted by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange in China on September 30, 2018, of RMB6.8792 to US$1.00. Unless otherwise noted, for the years ended September 30, 2016 and 2017 all translations from Renminbi to U.S. dollars in this Annual Report were made at RMB6.6778 and RMB6.6369 per US $1.00, respectively, which were the prevailing year or period end closing rates for those periods. We make no representation that any Renminbi or U.S. dollar amounts could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars or Renminbi, as the case may be, at any particular rate, the rates stated below, or at all. The PRC government imposes controls over its foreign currency reserves in part through direct regulation of the conversion of Renminbi into foreign exchange and through restrictions on foreign trade.

The following table sets forth information concerning exchange rates between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar for the periods indicated. These rates are not necessarily the exchange rates that we used in this Annual Report or will use in the preparation of our periodic reports or any other information to be provided to you. The source of the rates is the State Administration of Foreign Exchange in China. At September 30, 2018, the closing exchange rate was RMB6.8792 for one U.S. dollar. As of May 23, 2019, the closing exchange rate was RMB6.8994 for one U.S. dollar.

(1) Annual averages are calculated from month-end rates. Monthly averages are calculated using the average of the daily rates during the month. 

Not Applicable

Not Applicable.

Risks relating to our business   

If we do not manage our ongoing operations successfully, our growth and chances for profitability will be hindered or impeded.

Our company engages in corn seed research and development, deploying our biotechnology assets, establishing a new agribusiness e-commerce platform, and exploring Integrated Saline-Alkaline Land Reclamation (“ISALR”) technologies. We plan to continue our seed research and development activities, with a view to licensing our seed traits and seed germplasm characteristics and performing contract research and development services. We also plan to focus on our new endeavors of an agribusiness e-commerce platform oriented towards the rural China market. We are partnering with Longhan Investment Management, Co., Ltd. (“Longhan”) to integrate comprehensive ISALR technology and collaborating with Elastos Foundation (“Elastos”) to develop blockchain technologies . All these many and varied activities will require substantial initial investment and are expected to require additional demands on our corporate administrative, operational, and financial personnel and other human resources and on our cash flow needs. Our current resources are not likely to be fully adequate to support our planned operations and expansion.

Our independent auditors have issued their report with a going concern statement.

The report on our financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F contains a going concern statement. Based on our financial resources and our planned operations we will need to obtain a substantial amount of capital to continue our business, for which we do not have any long term arrangements, and/or generate increased revenue from operations to cover our expenses, of which we cannot be certain. If we are unable to fund our operations, we may have to curtail substantial parts of our business operations or cease our business operations. Investors should evaluate their investment in the Company based on these financial uncertainties.

We may not be able to pay back our long term borrowings.

We have our bank debt during normal course of business. As of September 30, 2018, our outstanding bank debt was RMB78.2 million (US$11.4 million), of which some of the principle is now due. We are in the process to refinance the bank debt or entering an investment so that the bank loan, which is collateralized by the Company’s headquarters building in Beijing, will be paid back upon receiving the RMB204 million investment from Beijing Changping Technology Innodevelop Group (BC-TID). However, such investment and refinance plan may not be completed according to our plan, and we may not be able to pay back our bank loans as planned. If we cannot pay off the borrowings, the bank may foreclose our assets.

The successful development and commercialization of our biotech pipeline of products will be important for our growth.

With the sale of our seed production and distribution business, we are focusing our seed business on biotechnology development and an e-commerce platform in the seed industry. We conduct our own research and development efforts for genetically modified seeds, referred to as GM. We also collaborate with the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, China Agricultural University, Zhejiang University in the PRC under various agreements for seed genetic modifications and other seed biotechnologies that give us the right to market the seeds and technologies they develop. We also are seeking other development and marketing arrangements with other entities in China and elsewhere. The length of time and the risk associated with breeding and biotech pipelines are similar and interlinked because both are required as a package for commercial success in markets where biotech traits are approved for growers. Regulatory requirements affect the development of our biotech products, including the GM crop testing of seeds containing the biotech traits, which could harm our business and results of operations if regulations are not satisfied. The testing procedures can be lengthy and costly, with no guarantee of success. It could have an adverse effect on our operations if our genetically modified products are unable to pass the safety evaluation for genetically modified agricultural organisms.

There has been a worldwide increase in the development and application of genetically modified agricultural products to enhance crop seed quality and increase crop yields.  The Biosafety certificate of genetically modified corn and rice seeds has been granted in China only recently.  As government policies change to allow more genetically modified seeds and demand develops for these products, we expect that we will produce more genetically modified products to the extent we are able. There is a risk that our current steps to respond to the potential competitive threat posed by genetically modified agricultural products, including our research and development activities with respect to genetically modified crop seeds, may not enable us to compete successfully.

The potential uncertainty in the government regulation in China of genetic technology and genetically modified, or GM, agricultural products and the acceptance of these products by the public could have an adverse effect on our business.

Genetically modified seed products are controversial; thus genetic modification has not yet been accepted in many countries throughout the world. The Chinese government has only recently begun to issue GM crop safety certificates for eventual commercial cultivation of GM seeds. Consumer reaction to GM products is also becoming a factor in the overall approval process and the ability of companies, such as ours, to sell or license our GM products. The relative novelty and the potential uncertainty in the government regulation of genetic technology and ultimate consumer acceptance will have an effect on our business development strategy and research activities and may cause us to re-evaluate our development programs for developing new seeds.

The government may not approve or may limit commercialization of genetically modified corn products, which could have an adverse impact on the future of the company.

Even though we believe biotechnology is important in agricultural applications and the government has supported and approved some uses of genetically modified seeds, we cannot predict whether or when the government will approve the full commercialization of GM seeds, including modified corn. The government may not approve the full commercialization of GM corn, and it may even ultimately conclude to limit or ban commercialization and/or research relating to genetically modified corn and other seed products. Any of these actions could have an adverse impact on our future development, and we would not be able to recover our research and development costs spent in developing biotechnology products.

Any operations outside China will be subject to foreign regulatory and legislative requirements, and it will be costly to comply with those regulatory requirements. If we are unable to meet these requirements, we will not be able to distribute our products.

Foreign regulatory and legislative requirements will impact the development and distribution of our seed products in the global market.

Certain markets may require rigorous testing and pre-approval prior to a market release of the GM seeds. For example, prior to the entry into the United States market, importers of non-United States seeds will need to obtain regulatory approval from various federal and state governmental agencies. The United States Department of Agriculture has to determine if there are any “plant pest” issues with the specific crop and traits. Further, some products may have to be submitted to the US Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) to determine if there are any pesticide-related traits that are subject to regulation. There may also have to be submitted a Microbial Commercial Activity Notice (MCAN) to the EPA, which includes detailed information describing the seed’s characteristics and genetic construction, health and environmental effects, and other data, before GM seeds can be used in the United States for commercial purposes. Finally, even if a seed product has the required certificates and permits, there will be continuous Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) regulation compliance about food safety, which place responsibility on the seed producer to assure the safety of the GM seed in the food chain and proof that GM crop seeds are “substantially equivalent” to non-modified versions of the seed. In the United States, there is also substantive state regulations applying to seeds: for example, some states have required specific labeling, banned planting and cultivation, and imposed additional certification requirements for use of GM seeds. These types of central and local government regulation and restrictions exist in many other countries around the world.

Obtaining and maintaining permits and certificates for production and sales, and obtaining and maintaining testing, planting and import approvals for our GM seeds, can be time-consuming and costly, with no guarantee of success. In addition, regulatory and legislative requirements may change over time which may affect sales and profitability in those markets. The failure to receive necessary permits or approvals could have long-term effects on our ability to enter into foreign markets.

It may take us a long time to generate revenue from our new agribusiness e-commerce platform.

We have traditionally been a seed development, production and distribution company. Recently, after the sale of the production and distribution aspects of our prior business, we decided to augment our traditional seed development business by expanding into the e-commerce space. Although we believe we can utilize our experience in seed distribution, our rural China customer base, and our strong brand name in the e-commerce venture, there is no guarantee that we can successfully develop and launch the e-commerce platform or that the e-commerce platform will be profitable. Furthermore, our prior experience in seed distribution was largely via traditional sale methods and our previous customer base may not be willing to try our new e-commerce platform. To attract new customers, we may need to price aggressively to gain market share or remain competitive in new categories. It may be difficult for us to achieve profitability in the new product categories and our profit margin, if any, may be lower than we anticipated, which would adversely affect our overall profitability and results of operations.

Our new venture in e-commerce depends on our joint partnership with third party suppliers and distributors.

We anticipate that our e-commerce platform will provide agricultural seed products (e.g., corn seeds, rice seeds, and vegetable seeds), other agricultural inputs (e.g., fertilizers and agricultural chemicals), foods, household products, and other consumer products to our customers. We do not produce any of the products we intend to sell on the e-commerce platform and will have to rely heavily on products provided by unrelated suppliers. Because we are a new player in e-commerce and have not built up a customer base yet, we may not have much purchasing power and may not be able to negotiate favorable terms with suppliers.

Furthermore, we are not familiar with the non-seed products we are intending to sell on the platform and it may also make it more difficult for us to inspect and control quality of those products being sold on the platform. We may receive more customer complaints about the products we are not familiar with and face costly product returns or product liability claims as a result of selling them, which would harm our brand and reputation as well as our financial performance.

We are dependent on our relationships with our strategic partners for joint venture development.

The success of our new joint venture development depends on our relationships with our joint venture partners. We believe partnering with local distributors using joint-venture structure will provide incentives for local distributors to prioritize our customers’ needs and orders and will ensure our customers’ orders will be fulfilled efficiently and effectively. We, however, cannot assure you that we will satisfy the conditions required to maintain these relationships and we also cannot assure you that whether the local distributor partners will be able to meet the needs of our customers or grow effectively meet the development objectives of the joint ventures.

Joint ventures, partnerships, and companies that we enter into present a number of challenges that could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations and cash flows.

We have developed five joint ventures in China and, as part of our business strategy, we may enter into other joint ventures or similar transactions. These transactions typically involve a number of risks and present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including the existence of unknown potential disputes, liabilities or contingencies that arise after entering into the joint venture related to the counterparties to such joint ventures We could experience financial or other setbacks if transactions encounter unanticipated problems due to challenges, including problems related to execution or integration. Any of these risks could reduce our revenues or increase our expenses, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.

We are relying heavily on our partners, including Elastos and the local distributors, to establish and operate the e-commerce platform.

We have little experience in e-commerce platform development, blockchain technology and agricultural business other than seeds. To successfully establish the e-commerce platform, we will need our partners’ help in a number of other areas, such as user traffic acquisition, advertising, technology, social graphs and IT infrastructure. While we can benefit from our partners’ experience in building platforms, connecting e-commerce with social network and blockchain technologies and new agricultural distribution business, our success is also reliant on our partners willingness to develop and maintain the platform for us. In the event that we cannot maintain our cooperative relationships with our joint venture partners on terms favorable to us or at all, we will need to source other business partners to provide services such as distribution channels, promotion services, as well as IT and payment services, and we may lose access to key strategic assets, which could result in material and adverse effects on our business and results of operations.

Network errors could adversely affect our user experience and market acceptance of our products, which may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our e-commerce platform or content on our platform may contain network or programming errors that adversely affect the user experience and market acceptance of the offered products. Errors in products, delivery, content, connection will negatively impact brand image and our customers willingness to use our platform. We may not be able to detect and resolve all these errors effectively. Programming errors or defects may adversely affect user experience, cause users to refrain from subscribing for our services, buying our products, or cause our delivery errors or delays and prevent our customers from using our service.

If we fail to keep up with industry trends or technological developments, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

The e-commerce industry is rapidly evolving and subject to continuous technological and market preference changes. Our success will depend on our ability to keep up with the changes in technology and user behavior resulting from new developments and innovations. For example, we believe our use of blockchain technology to track the origin of seeds is an effective way to combat fake seeds and intellectual property infringement issues related to the seeds but our competitors may be able to develop better technologies to solve the same problem. Technological innovations may also require substantial capital expenditures in product development as well as in modification of products, services or infrastructure. We cannot assure that we can obtain financing to cover such expenditure. If we fail to adapt our products and services to such changes in an effective and timely manner, we may suffer from decreased user traffic and user base, which, in turn, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We operate in a relatively new and evolving market.

Many elements of our business are unique, evolving and relatively unproven. Our business and prospects primarily depend on the continuing development and growth of the e-commerce in China as well as the expansion of 4G communication network in rural China, and the continuing modernization of rural logistics system, which are affected by numerous factors and not within our control. Furthermore, product quality, user experience, technological innovations, development of internet and internet-based services, regulatory environment and macroeconomic environment are also important factors that affect our business and prospects. The markets for our products are relatively new and rapidly developing and are subject to significant challenges. In addition, our continued growth depends, in part, on our ability to respond to constant changes in the e-commerce industry, particularly in the use e-commerce platforms in rural China, rapid technological evolution, continued shifts in customer demands, frequent introductions of new products and services and constant emergence of new industry standards and practices. Developing and integrating new products, services or infrastructure could be expensive and time-consuming, and these efforts may not yield the benefits we expect to achieve. If we cannot successfully introduce our e-commerce platform to rural China or maintain and grow our customer base once the platform is launched, our business, financial condition and results of operation may be materially and adversely affected.

The potential uncertainty in the government regulation in China regarding e-commerce could delay the launch of our e-commerce platform and have an adverse effect on our business.

The laws and regulations in China regarding internet services, e-commerce and data privacy are still under development. The authorities are still in the process of developing various methods and guidelines related to the implementation of the Cyber security laws, internet laws and data security laws. The new rules will impose additional compliance requirements related to the communication, storage and automation of our data. We believe there remains uncertainties as to the interpretation and application of the current law and regulation. Complying with such requirements could cause us to incur substantial expenses or require us to alter or change our practices in a manner that could harm our business.  

There is no guarantee that the Integrated Saline-Alkaline Land Reclamation Technology (“ISALR”) can be deployed on a large scale or can integrate with our seed breeding technology.

Although the ISALR Technology has been successfully tested on various crops across several provinces in China, it is uncertain whether the technology could be deployed on a large scale inside China or be used outside of China. The success in ISALR technology also relies on the support of various level of the Chinese government, so the global trading dynamics and subsidy policies from the Chinese government are important to the deployment of ISALR technology. Additional, we are hoping to incorporate our seed technology with the seed and soil treatment technologies from Longhan. It is unclear the technology integration will be successful. It is also unclear regarding the competitions since this is relatively a new field of agricultural technology and the intellectual protection could also be challenging.

The degree of public acceptance or perceived public acceptance of our biotechnology products can affect our operations.

Although all genetically modified products must go through rigorous testing, some opponents of the technology consistently attempt to raise public concern about the potential for adverse effects of genetically modified seed products on human or animal health, other plants and the environment. The potential for the adventitious presence of commercial biotechnology traits in conventional seed, or in the grain or products produced from conventional or organic crops, is another factor that could affect the public’s acceptance of these traits. Public concern can affect the timing of, and whether we are able to obtain, government approvals. Even after approvals are granted, public concern may lead to increased regulation or legislation, which could affect our business and operations, and may adversely affect sales of our products to farmers, due to their concerns about available markets for the sale of crops or other products derived from biotechnology.

The global competition in biotechnology will affect our business.

We believe we are a leader in biotechnology in China since we have been conducting our proprietary biotechnology research program for many years and have an internal biotech research center. However, as multinational corporations engaged in the crop seed business expand into the agricultural market in China, we anticipate that they will have a greater portfolio of seed products and more advanced technologies than us. Major multinational competitors have a long history in the research and commercialization of their products, sophisticated marketing capabilities and strong intellectual property estates, all of which may give them competitive advantage over us. Any of these competitive advantages could cause our existing or future products to become less competitive or outdated, and adversely affect our product acceptance in the market place and our results of operations.

Our globalization plans may be difficult to achieve due to the expense of establishing a market presence.

Although we believe we have potential seeds that could be of interest outside of China, to establish a global brand and presence will be difficult. Establishing a brand and maintaining a local presence will take substantial resources and time.  

We face significant international competition in the GM seed market and the competition may affect our overall sales.

The GM seed market outside China is highly competitive, dominated by a limited number of companies. Many of our competitors have greater experience of the GM market and substantially greater resources in the research and development of plant biotechnology. These companies also have substantial production facilities for crop seeds. In addition, our competitors have established market presence, have obtained patent protection in some instances for different seeds, and have built up their brand reputation and distribution networks globally. For example, in the United States Monsanto Company and E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company (Pioneer), dominate the GM corn seed market with approximately 70% of that market. These companies’ extensive GM portfolio of seeds and their success in developing new traits in the seeds could render our existing products less competitive, including within the China markets, resulting in reduced sales and licensing opportunities compared to our expectations.

We may not be able to maintain our market advantage by improving our GM seeds to fit the needs of the market.

GM seeds varieties need to be improved and altered over a relatively short time frame because the weeds and insects develop resistance to herbicides and pesticides, which often renders the benefits of a particular GM traits less effective. GM seeds need to be altered to tolerate higher doses and/or new varieties of herbicides and pesticides and other farming practices. If our GM seed portfolio does not keep pace with these changes or goes in a direction that is not effective in the market, our position in the market would be adversely impacted. Alternatively, we believe that this characteristic of GM seeds gives us an opportunity to introduce our products into various seed markets needing new varieties. We will be required to continue to invest in new research to develop our portfolio of GM seeds so that our GM seeds can adapt to new herbicides and pesticides and differing soil, weather and growing conditions.

We operate in a competitive industry. If we are unable to compete successfully, we may not succeed in our e-commerce platform.

We believe e-commerce is popular in rural China and with the Chinese government’s introduction of 4G network and expansion of rural logistics will make rural e-commerce a valuable market. The e-commerce market is highly competitive and we face competition for customer and their time and spending primarily from the other e-commerce platforms provided by bigger and more mature e-commerce giants in China. We believe that we will compete with our competitors based on a number of factors, such as the diversity of products, product features, services, social interaction features, quality of user experience, brand awareness and reputation. Many of our competitors may have greater financial, marketing or technology resources than we do, which enable them to respond more quickly to technological innovations or changes in user demands and preferences, acquire more attractive content and devote greater resources towards the development, promotion and sale of products than we can. Also, they may provide their users with content that we do not have the license to offer. If any of our competitors achieves greater market acceptance or is able to provide more attractive content offerings than we do, our user traffic and market share may decrease, which may result in a loss of users and a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have a relatively short operating history in the field of biotechnology research and are subject to the risks of any developing enterprise, any one of which could limit our growth and our product and market development.

It continues to be difficult to predict how our business will develop over the long term. Accordingly, we are still facing all of the risks and uncertainties encountered by companies in the earlier stages of development, such as:

If we are not able to meet the challenges of our businesses and managing our business plan, the likely result will be slowed growth, lower margins, additional operational costs and lower income, any of which will affect shareholder value.

Any diversion of management attention to matters related to corporate reorganization or any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with changing operations may have an adverse effect on our core business, results of operations, and/or financial condition. 

Corporate reorganization and transformation activities present challenges, including geographical coordination, personnel integration and retention of key management personnel, system integration and the unification of corporate culture. These efforts generally divert management attention from our core business, cause a temporary interruption of or loss of momentum in our business and the loss of key personnel from the acquired companies. In addition, any proposed acquisitions and corporate reorganization activities will cause us to incur substantial costs, none of which are generally recoverable.

From time to time we must evaluate whether or not to discontinue a line of business or an expansion effort, which if discontinued could have an adverse impact on our financial position.

From time to time we evaluate whether or not to continue a particular line of business or an expansion effort. In the past we implemented restructuring programs to eliminate our activities in agricultural chemicals and cotton seed development, sales centers, seed distribution and other unprofitable activities. In 2017, we sold all of our seed production and distribution business to Beijing Shihui Agricultural Development Co. Ltd. Whenever a company undertakes to discontinue a line of business, there are expenses associated with the sale or closing of those related operations, which are reflected in the accounting for discontinued operations. The actual and accounting costs for discontinued operations may have an adverse effect on the financial position of the company in the period of discontinuance, which may result in an adverse market reaction and decline in our stock price. 

We or our licensors may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims, which may force us to incur substantial legal expenses and, if determined adversely against us or our licensors, may materially disrupt our business.

We cannot be certain that our licensed or self-developed proprietary seed products, our blockchain technology for e-commerce platform and the ISALR technologies do not or will not infringe the intellectual property rights held by third parties. We, or any of our licensors, may be subject to legal proceedings and claims from time to time related to the intellectual property of others. If we, or any of our licensors, are found to have violated the intellectual property rights of others, we may be required to pay damages and be enjoined from using such intellectual property, and we may incur new or additional licensing fees if we wish to continue using the infringing products, or be forced to develop or license alternative products. In addition, we may incur substantial expenses in defending against these third party infringement claims, regardless of their merit.

Efforts to protect our intellectual property rights and to defend against claims can increase our costs and may not always succeed. Any failures could adversely affect our sales and results of operations or restrict our ability to conduct our business.

Intellectual property rights are important to our business. The seed markets in China face substantial counterfeiting. We endeavor to obtain and protect our intellectual property rights where our products are produced. However, we may be unable to obtain protection for our intellectual property. Even if protection is obtained, competitors, growers or others in the chain of commerce may raise legal challenges to our rights or illegally infringe our rights, including through means that may be difficult to prevent, detect or defend. In addition, because of the rapid pace of technological change and the confidentiality of patent applications in some jurisdictions, competitors may be issued patents from applications that were unknown to us prior to issuance. These patents could reduce the value of our commercial or pipeline products or, to the extent they cover key technologies on which we have unknowingly relied, require that we obtain licenses at a financial cost to us or cease using the technology, no matter how valuable the patents may be to our business. We cannot assure you that we would be able to obtain such licenses on acceptable terms. Also, litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. There is a risk that the outcome of such potential litigation may not be in our favor. Such litigation may be costly and may divert management attention as well as consume other resources which could otherwise be devoted to our business. An adverse determination in any such litigation will impair our intellectual property rights and may harm our business, prospects and reputation. In addition, we have no insurance coverage against litigation costs due to lack of this kind of insurance being available in China, and we would have to bear all costs arising from such litigation to the extent we are unable to recover such costs from other parties. The occurrence of any of the foregoing may harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Finally, implementation of PRC intellectual property-related laws has historically been lacking, primarily because of the ambiguities in the PRC laws and the difficulties in enforcement. Accordingly, intellectual property rights and confidentiality protections in China may not be as effective as they are in the United States or other countries, which increases the risk that we may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property. The increase in counterfeiting seed products in the market is also affecting the sales of our products.

Failure to develop and market new products could impact the Company’s competitive position and have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial results.

The Company’s operating results will depend on our ability to renew our pipeline of new seed products and to bring those products to the market. This ability could be adversely affected by difficulties or delays in product development such as the inability to identify viable new products, greater than anticipated development costs, technical difficulties, regulatory obstacles, competition, lack of demand, insufficient intellectual property protection, or lack of market acceptance of new products and services. Due to the lengthy development process, technological challenges and intense competition, there can be no assurance that any of the products the Company is currently developing, or could begin to develop in the future, will achieve substantial commercial success. Consequently, if we are not able to fund our research and development activities and deliver new products to the markets we serve on a timely basis, our growth and operations will be harmed. In addition, sales of the Company’s new products could cannibalize sales of some of its current products, offsetting the benefit of even a successful product introduction.

If we fail to introduce and commercialize new crop seeds, we will not be able to recover research, development and cover our other costs.

We cannot guarantee the development and performance of new crop seed varieties, whether licensed or proprietary, or that they will meet our customers’ expectations. Farmers generally need time to learn about new seed varieties and how to plant and tend them. Their traditional planting experience may make it difficult for them to adapt to the new varieties. The process and timing for new seed products to gain market recognition and acceptance is long and uncertain. If we fail to introduce and commercialize a new seed variety that meets the demand of farmers and to provide the proper education about the seeds to distributors, farmers and the public, we may not be able to generate sufficient sales to cover our costs or generate a financial return on our investment.

We may be exposed to product quality claims, which may cause us to incur substantial legal expenses and, if determined adversely against us, may cause us to pay significant damage awards.

The performance of our seeds depends on climate, geographical areas, cultivation method, farmers’ degree of knowledge and other factors in addition to genetic traits and the quality of our seeds. Natural disasters may also affect the performance of our seeds, particularly when farmers are not able to timely and effectively respond to those disasters. Furthermore, the cultivability of some farmland is deteriorating because of toxic and hazardous materials resulting from farmers’ overuse of chemical herbicides and pesticides and the fall-out from other sources of environmental pollution. These factors generally cause underproduction, but farmers may attribute underproduction to seed quality. We may be subject to legal proceedings and claims from time to time relating to our seed quality. The defense of these proceedings and claims can be both costly and time consuming and may significantly divert efforts and resources of our management personnel. An adverse determination in any such proceeding could subject us to significant liability and damage our market reputation and prevent us from achieving increased sales and market share. Protracted litigation could also result in our customers or potential customers deferring or limiting their purchase of our products.

We have limited business insurance coverage in China. 

PRC insurance companies do not offer extensive business insurance products. As a result, we have very limited business liability insurance, business disruption insurance, or product liability coverage for our operations in China. We have determined that the difficulties associated with acquiring such insurance on commercially acceptable terms make it impractical for us to obtain such coverage. Most likely we would bear the effects of any business disruption, litigation or natural disaster resulting in our incurring substantial costs and the diversion of our resources, and could adversely affect our operations and financial condition.   

Risks relating to doing business in China

If we do not comply with PRC regulations, we may not be able to operate our business or we may be fined, both of which would adversely affect our business, operations and revenues.

The PRC has many regulations relating to the seed business and internet sales business. Seed products must be licensed and undergo a stringent review process before they may be sold in the PRC. Environmental regulation in the future may be potentially concerned with the development, growing and use of GM seed products. Seed development companies also have requirements for their facilities, personnel and investment. The internet sales business has evolving privacy regulations. We believe we currently have all the necessary licenses for our business, and that we are in compliance with the other applicable laws and regulations. If we are not in compliance, we may be fined or lose the ability to sell a particular seed or operate our business altogether. If the fines are substantial or if our ability to sell or operate is withdrawn, this will result in additional costs or the loss of revenues and could prevent us from continuing as an operating business.

The technical services agreements between Origin Biotechnology and the other operating subsidiaries may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities for transfer pricing adjustments. 

We could face adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that our technical service agreements between Origin Biotechnology and the other PRC operating subsidiaries (and possibly our former subsidiaries), were not entered into based on arm’s length negotiations. If the PRC tax authorities determine that these agreements were not entered into on an arm’s length basis, they may adjust our income and expenses for PRC tax purposes in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could result in a reduction, for PRC tax purposes, of deductions recorded by the operating subsidiaries, which could adversely affect us by:

As a result, any transfer pricing adjustment could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.

Our business benefits from certain PRC government subsidies. Expiration of, or changes to, these incentives could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

The PRC government has in the past provided reduced taxes and subsidies and other support across various industries, including the agricultural industry. For instance, the government subsidizes farmers for their seed purchases, and has increased spending on rural infrastructure. Sales of agricultural products from producers to intermediaries or to farmers are exempt from PRC Value-Added Tax (“VAT”). More recently, the government has cut back on these preferential treatments to the seed industry and farmers. In addition, subsidy policies have an adverse effect on our ability to market our products. Farmers can buy crop seeds designated as “high-quality” at subsidized prices, however, the designation of seeds as “high-quality” is at the discretion of the local government. It is possible that this policy could result in preferential treatment for local seed producers, with locally produced seeds being designated as “high-quality” while ours are not designated as such. If such preferential treatment were to occur, the price for our seeds to farmers in those provinces will be higher than the subsidized local seeds, and the sale of our seeds in that province will suffer, adversely affect our results of operations.

The discontinuation of any of the preferential tax treatments currently available to our PRC subsidiaries could materially increase our tax liabilities.

Beijing Origin is entitled to a preferential enterprise income tax rate of 15% as a result of having the qualification of a “high and new technology enterprise”.  This qualification is effective for a three-year period from October 2017 and subject to an annual evaluation by the relevant government authorities in China. Additionally, Beijing Origin has recently received a “breed-produce-distribute” integrated crop seed license and is currently applying for a more favorable tax rate. The financial position of the company after the sale of our corn related production and distribution assets may cause the termination of the high and new technology enterprise qualification reapplication and cause an adverse impact on tax or tax rate.

The discontinuation of any of our preferential tax treatments could materially increase our tax obligations, and our future application for more favorable tax rate based on our “breed-produce-distribute” integrated crop seed license may not be approved.

Under China’s Enterprise Income Tax Law, we may be classified as a “resident enterprise” of China. Such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders

Under the current Enterprise Income Tax Law, or the New EIT Law, an enterprise established outside of China with “de facto management bodies” within China is considered a “resident enterprise,” meaning that it can be treated in a manner similar to a Chinese enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes. The implementing rules of the EIT Law define de facto management as “substantial and overall management and control over the production and operations, personnel, accounting, and properties” of the enterprise. In April 2009, the SAT issued a circular, known as Circular 82, which provides certain specific criteria for determining whether the "de facto management body" of a PRC-controlled enterprise that is incorporated offshore is located in China. Although this circular only applies to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises or PRC enterprise groups, not those controlled by PRC individuals or foreigners like us, the criteria set forth in the circular may reflect the SAT's general position on how the "de facto management body" text should be applied in determining the tax resident status of all offshore enterprises. According to Circular 82, an offshore incorporated enterprise controlled by a PRC enterprise or a PRC enterprise group will be regarded as a PRC tax resident by virtue of having its "de facto management body" in China and will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on its global income only if all of the following conditions are met: (i) the primary location of the day-to-day operational management is in the PRC; (ii) decisions relating to the enterprise's financial and human resource matters are made or are subject to approval by organizations or personnel in the PRC; (iii) the enterprise's primary assets, accounting books and records, company seals, and board and shareholder resolutions, are located or maintained in the PRC; and (iv) at least 50% of voting board members or senior executives habitually reside in the PRC. 

However, it is unclear how tax authorities will determine tax residency based on the facts of each case. If the PRC tax authorities determine that our British Virgin Islands holding company is a “resident enterprise” for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, a number of unfavorable PRC tax consequences could follow. First, we may be subject to enterprise income tax on our worldwide taxable income as well as PRC enterprise income tax reporting obligations. Second, we may be required to withhold a 10% withholding tax from dividends we pay to our shareholders that are non-resident enterprises.

In addition to the uncertainty in how the “resident enterprise” classification could apply, it is also possible that the rules may change in the future, possibly with retroactive effect.

Adverse changes in political and economic policies of the PRC, including its policy of reforming its economic system, could have an adverse effect on the growth of private businesses in the PRC such as ours.

Although the PRC has been reforming its economic system to rely more on market forces to influence the deployment of economic resources, it still has strong elements of a planned economy based on governmental dictates and priorities that determine or at least influence business endeavors. We cannot predict whether or not the government will continue to encourage economic liberalization and further loosen its control over the economy and encourage private enterprise or whether it will strengthen its controls through planned industrial policy and control financial and other elements of economic condition. We also cannot predict the timing or extent of future economic policy that may be proposed. Any imposition of planned economy regulation or similar kinds of restrictions could reduce the freedom of private businesses to operate in a profitable manner, restrict inflows of capital or stifle investor willingness to participate in the PRC economy. To the extent we need additional capital; any restrictions on foreign ownership, foreign investment and repatriation of profits will hamper our ability to find capital outside of the PRC.

A return to profit repatriation controls may limit our ability to pay dividends and expand our business, and may reduce the attractiveness of investing in PRC business opportunities.

PRC law allows enterprises owned by foreign investors to remit to other countries their current account items, such as profits, dividends and bonuses earned in the PRC, and the remittance does not require prior approval by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, upon the proper production of qualified commercial vouchers or legal documents as required by the regulations. However, dividend payments are subject to prior satisfaction of corporate and withholding tax obligations, corporate reserve requirements and board determined social benefit allocations. SAFE regulations generally require extensive documentation and reporting about other kinds of payments to be transmitted outside of China, some of which is burdensome and slows payments. The availability of foreign exchange assets in the banking system will also effect the ability to repatriate profits as well as provide funding for foreign operations. If there is a return to payment restrictions and reporting, the ability of a PRC company to attract investors will be reduced.

Also, our investors may not be able to obtain the benefits of the profits of the business generated in the PRC for other reasons. Relevant PRC laws and regulations permit payment of dividends only from accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. Each of our subsidiaries and our affiliated entities in China is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund a statutory reserve until such reserve reaches 50% of its registered capital, and to further set aside a portion of its after-tax profits to fund the employee welfare fund at the discretion of the shareholders’ meeting or the board. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may require us to adjust our taxable income under the contractual arrangements we currently have in place in a manner that would materially and adversely affect our subsidiary’s ability to pay dividends and other distributions to us. Any limitation on the ability of our subsidiary and our affiliated entity to distribute dividends or other payments to us could materially limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our businesses or otherwise fund and conduct our business.

Pursuant to PRC enterprise income tax law, dividends payable by a foreign-invested enterprise, or FIE, including Origin Biotechnology, from sources in the PRC to its foreign investors are subject to a 10% withholding tax, unless any such foreign investor’s jurisdiction of incorporation has a tax treaty with China that provides for a different withholding arrangement. No such treaty currently exists with the British Virgin Islands.  Prior to 2008, dividend payments to foreign investors made by FIEs were exempt from PRC withholding tax.

Any fluctuations in exchange rates may adversely affect your investment.

The value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in political and economic conditions. Because our earnings and cash from operations are denominated in Renminbi, as the reporting currency, fluctuations in exchange rates between U.S. dollars and Renminbi will affect our balance sheet and earnings per share when stated in U.S. dollars. The translation of Renminbi amounts into United States dollar amounts has been made for the convenience of the reader. Such translation amounts should not be construed as representations that the Renminbi amounts could be readily converted into United States dollar amounts at that rate or any other rate. The appreciation or depreciation in the value of the Renminbi relative to the U.S. dollar would affect our financial results when reported in U.S. dollar terms without giving effect to any underlying change in our business or results of operations. Fluctuations in the exchange rate will affect the relative value of any dividend we issue which will be exchanged into U.S. dollars, the value of any U.S. dollar denominated investments we make in the future and any earnings on such investments.

There are government regulations that limit or prohibit foreign investment in the PRC, which may restrict our growth.

Notwithstanding the general restriction on foreign investment in the seed industry in the PRC, our corporate structure currently enables us to receive foreign investment. Our continued ability to receive foreign investment may be important to our ability to continue to expand our business rapidly and to manage that expansion effectively. We cannot be certain that a change in the regulations allowing us to receive foreign investment will not occur. In the event of such a change, our plan to expand our business could be disrupted.

PRC regulations relating to offshore investment activities by PRC residents may increase the administrative burden we face and create regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our overseas and cross-border investment activity. Failure by our shareholders who are PRC residents to make any required applications and filings pursuant to such regulations may prevent us from being able to distribute profits, if any, and could expose us and our PRC resident shareholders to liability under PRC law.

SAFE promulgated regulations that require registration with local SAFE offices in connection with direct or indirect offshore investment by PRC residents, including PRC individual residents and PRC corporate entities. These regulations apply to our shareholders who are PRC residents and also apply to our prior and future offshore acquisitions. In particular, the SAFE regulations require PRC residents to file with competent SAFE offices information about offshore companies in which they have directly or indirectly invested and to make follow-up filings in connection with certain material transactions involving such offshore companies, such as increases or decreases in investment amount, transfers or exchanges of shares, mergers or divisions, long-term equity or debt investments, or external guarantees or other material events that do not involve return investment.

The SAFE regulations required prior registration of direct or indirect investments previously made by PRC residents in offshore companies. If a PRC resident with a direct or indirect stake in an offshore parent company fails to make the required SAFE registration, the PRC subsidiaries of such offshore parent company may be prohibited from making distributions of profit to the offshore parent and from paying the offshore parent proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation in respect of the PRC subsidiaries. Further, failure to comply with various SAFE registration requirements described above could result in liability under PRC law for foreign exchange evasion.

We believe our major shareholders who are PRC residents, or whose shares are beneficially owned by PRC residents, have completed foreign exchange registration with the local foreign exchange bureau according to these SAFE regulations. However, with these regulations there is uncertainty concerning the reconciliation of the new regulations with other approval requirements, it is unclear how the regulations, and any future legislation concerning offshore or cross-border transactions, will be interpreted, amended and implemented by the relevant government authorities. We cannot assure you that all of our shareholders who are PRC residents will comply with our request to make or obtain any applicable registrations or approvals required by the regulations or other related legislation. The failure or inability of our PRC resident shareholders to receive any required approvals or make any required registrations may subject us to fines and legal sanctions, restrict our overseas or cross-border investment activities, limit our PRC subsidiary to make distributions or pay dividends or affect our ownership structure. As a result, our business operations and our ability to distribute a dividend to you could be adversely affected.

The PRC legal system has inherent uncertainties that could limit the legal protections available to you.

All of our assets and all of our operations are in the PRC. The PRC legal system is based on written statutes. Prior court decisions may be cited for reference but are not binding on subsequent cases and have limited precedential value. Since 1979, the PRC legislative bodies have promulgated laws and regulations dealing with such economic matters as foreign investment, corporate organization and governance, commerce, taxation and trade. However, because of the limited volume of published decisions and their non-binding nature, the interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations involve uncertainties. The laws in the PRC differ from the laws in the United States and may afford less protection to our non-PRC shareholders.

You may experience difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing original actions in the PRC based on United States judgments against us, our subsidiaries, officers and directors.

We are incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and our PRC operating subsidiaries are formed under PRC law. Substantially all of our assets are located in the PRC. In addition, some of our directors and executive officers reside within the PRC, and substantially all of the assets of these persons are located within the PRC. It may not be possible to affect service of process within the United States or elsewhere outside the PRC upon our directors, or executive officers and experts, including effecting service of process with respect to matters arising under United States federal securities laws or applicable state securities laws. The PRC does not have treaties providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments of courts with the United States and many other countries. As a result, recognition and enforcement in the PRC of judgments of a court in the United States or many other jurisdictions in relation to any matter, including securities laws, may be difficult or impossible. Furthermore, an original action may be brought in the PRC against our assets and our subsidiaries, our directors and executive officers and experts only if the actions are not required to be arbitrated by PRC law and only if the facts alleged in the complaint give rise to a cause of action under PRC law. In connection with any such original action, a PRC court may award civil liability, including monetary damages.

A reversion in the Chinese government’s policy of favoring state owned enterprise including seed companies at the expanse of privately owned companies may disadvantage our competitive position in the industry.

In China, state owned enterprises including state owned seed companies typically enjoy preferential policy treatments such as more favorable access to capital, tax breaks and subsidies at various levels of governments. These treatments have created barriers of entry protecting state companies at the expense of private ones, both domestic and international. Despite the reform of the Chinese seed industry in 2008 and the anticipated market-driven industry consolidation going forward, any reversion in the Chinese government’s policy to protect state owned seed companies may again pose competitive challenges to non-state owned companies such as Origin.

We may become a passive foreign investment company, which could result in adverse U.S. tax consequences to U.S. holders.

Depending upon the value of our shares and the composition of our assets and income over time, we could be classified as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, by the IRS, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If we were classified as a PFIC in any taxable year in which you hold our shares and you are a U.S. investor, you would generally be taxed at higher ordinary income rates, rather than lower capital gain rates, when we dispose of those shares at a gain in a later year, even if we are not a PFIC in that year. In addition, a portion of the tax imposed on your gain would be increased by an interest charge. Moreover, if we were classified as a PFIC in any taxable year, you would not be able to benefit from any preferential tax rate with respect to any dividend distribution that you may receive from us in that year or any later year. Finally, you would also be subject to special U.S. tax reporting requirements.

Based on our understanding and current assessment, we believe that we were not a PFIC for the taxable year 2015. However, there can be no assurance that we will not be a PFIC for the taxable year and/or later taxable years, as PFIC status is re-tested each year and depends on the facts in such year. For example, we would be a PFIC for the taxable year 2015 if the sum of our average market capitalization, which is our share price multiplied by the total number of our outstanding shares, and our liabilities over that taxable year is not more than twice the value of our cash, cash equivalents, and other assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income. We could also be a PFIC for any taxable year if the gross income that we and our subsidiaries earn from passive investments is substantial in comparison with the gross income from our business operations. While we will continue to examine our PFIC status, we cannot assure you that we will not be a PFIC for any future taxable year.

Risks relating to our shares

Certain provisions in our organizational documents may discourage our acquisition by a third party, which could limit your opportunity to sell your shares at a premium.

Our memorandum and articles of association include provisions that could limit the ability of others to acquire control of us. Under those provisions, our board of directors has the power to issue preferred shares with such rights attaching to them as they decide and this power could be used in a manner that would delay, defer or prevent a change of control of us. These provisions could have the effect of depriving you of the opportunity to sell your shares at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging third parties from seeking to acquire control of us in a tender offer or similar transactions.

We qualify as a foreign private issuer and, as a result, are subject to reduced requirements with respect to the reporting of financial statements and other material events to our shareholders and the SEC.

As a foreign private issuer, we are obligated to file an Annual Report with audited financial statements and Form 6-K reports with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, at such times as we release information to the public either voluntarily or pursuant to the laws of the British Virgin Islands or the PRC. Therefore, the regularity of financial and other information may be less than would be applicable to a domestic United States registered company under the rules and regulations of the SEC. Investors may not receive information on a timely basis, which could increase their risk of investment in us.

Because we are a foreign private issuer, we have elected to follow British Virgin Islands law in connection with compliance under the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules, which restrict the application of the Nasdaq corporate governance requirements.

The Nasdaq Marketplace Rules permit foreign private issuers to elect not to be governed by all the corporate governance rules. We have elected to avail ourselves of the exemption provided by Nasdaq, and we have elected to be governed by only the British Virgin Island laws and the terms of our memorandum and articles, which for example do not require us to hold an annual meeting each year. Consequently, investors may not have the ability to express their opinion on our business and the actions of directors through the voting process for directors. In other respects, we do follow the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules, such as having a nominations and compensation committee, but these are voluntary and may be eliminated at any time.

A consistently active trading market for shares of our ordinary shares may not be sustained.

Historically, trading in our ordinary shares has been volatile. Generally, the market for our ordinary shares is characterized as “thinly-traded.” There have been, and may in the future be, extended periods when trading activity in our shares is minimal, as compared to a seasoned issuer with a large and steady volume of trading activity. The trading volume at a point in time, combined with the availability of stock, generally will impact the price at which our ordinary shares trade. Trading of a relatively small quantity of ordinary shares may disproportionately influence the market price of our ordinary shares. A consistently active and liquid trading market in our securities may never develop or be sustained.

Our stock price may be volatile.

The market price of our ordinary shares is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following: our ability to execute our business plan; operating results that fall below expectations; industry or regulatory developments; investor perception of our industry or our prospects; economic and other external factors; and the other risk factors as discussed below.

In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our ordinary shares.

Leverage and debt service obligations may adversely affect our cash flows.

We currently have no short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term borrowings of approximately RMB78.24 million (US$11.37 million).  The degree to which we are leveraged could, among other things:

Our ability to meet our debt service obligations will depend upon our future performance, which will be subject to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, many of which are beyond our control.

In the course of preparing our consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2018, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to implement, achieve and maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may be unable to accurately report our financial results, and investor confidence and the market price of our shares may be adversely impacted .

In the course of preparing our consolidated financial statements for the years ended September 30, 2018, our accountant noticed material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting because during certain period of the fiscal year 2018, the Company does not have sufficient qualified financial reporting and accounting personnel with an appropriate level of expertise to properly address complex accounting issues under U.S. GAAP, and to prepare and review our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures to fulfill U.S. GAAP and Securities and Exchange Commission financial reporting requirements on a timely basis, resulted from staff turnover during the fiscal year 2018 and during the course of the audit for fiscal year 2018, BDO China Shu Lun Pan Certified Public Accountants LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has corrected the misstatements relating to accounts and disclosures, in aggregate, material to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2018.

We are in the process of remediating the above issues. We hired James Chen whom became the CFO March, 2018, to oversee the accounting issues and prepare the financial statements in the future. Additionally, the existing controls and procedures will be reviewed and steps will be taken to return the financial reporting to its former efficiencies using the reviewed controls and procedures. We cannot assure you that the measures we take will be sufficient to remediate the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, and, if we fail to timely achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, we may continue to be unable to conclude that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting. Moreover, effective internal controls over financial reporting are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to prevent fraud. As a result, our failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could result in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which in turn could harm our business and negatively impact the market price of our ordinary shares.

Our auditor, like other independent registered public accounting firms operating in China, is not permitted to be subject to inspection by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and as such, investors may be deprived of the benefits of such inspection.

The independent registered public accounting firm that issues the audit reports included in our annual reports filed with the SEC, as an auditor of companies that are traded publicly in the United States and a firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), or PCAOB, is required by the laws of the United States to undergo regular inspections by PCAOB to assess its compliance with the laws of the United States and professional standards. Because our auditor is located in China, a jurisdiction where PCAOB is currently unable to conduct inspections without the approval of the PRC authorities, our auditor, like other independent registered public accounting firms operating in China, is currently not inspected by PCAOB. Inspections of other firms that PCAOB has conducted outside of China have identified deficiencies in those firms’ audit procedures and quality control procedures, which may be addressed as part of the inspection process to improve future audit quality. The inability of PCAOB to conduct inspections of independent registered public accounting firms operating in China makes it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of our auditor’s audit procedures or quality control procedures. As a result, investors may be deprived of the benefits of PCAOB inspections.

On May 24, 2013, the PCAOB announced that it has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) on Enforcement Cooperation with the China Securities Regulatory Commission (the “CSRC”) and the Ministry of Finance (the “MOF”).  The MOU establishes a cooperative framework between the parties for the production and exchange of audit documents relevant to investigations in both countries’ respective jurisdictions.  More specifically, it provides a mechanism for the parties to request and receive from each other assistance in obtaining documents and information in furtherance of their investigative duties.  In addition to developing enforcement MOU, the PCAOB has been engaged in continuing discussions with the CSRC and MOF to permit joint inspections in China of audit firms that are registered with the PCAOB and audit Chinese companies that trade on U.S. exchanges. On December 7, 2018, the SEC and the PCAOB issued a joint statement highlighting continued challenges faced by the U.S. regulators in their oversight of financial statement audits of U.S.-listed companies with significant operations in China. However, it remains unclear what further actions the SEC and PCAOB will take to address the problem.