The Company’s historical consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and presented in United States dollars. The following selected statements of operations data for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2019 and the balance sheet data as of March 31, 2018 and 2019 are derived from the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Annual Report. The selected statements of operations data for each of the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2016 and the balance sheet data as of March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 were derived from the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which are not included in this Annual Report. The selected information is qualified in its entirety by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, such consolidated financial statements, related notes and “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” included as Item 5 in this report.

RISK FACTORS

The Company’s business and operations involve numerous risks, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, which may affect future results and the market price of the Company’s Common Shares. Investors should take into accounts the risks described below, and the other information contained in this Annual Report, when evaluating an investment in the Company.

Risks Related To Doing Business In China And Myanmar.

Changes in Labor Laws, Environmental Regulation, Safety Regulation and Business Practices, and Operating Costs in China, and in Shenzhen, In Particular, Have Significantly Increased The Costs And Burdens Of Doing Business And Could Continue To Negatively Impact The Company’s Operations And Profitability . In the past, foreign owned enterprises, such as the Company and its subsidiaries, have established manufacturing/assembly facilities in China because of China’s lower labor costs, lower facilities costs, less stringent environmental regulations, and certain benefits provided to foreign entities to encourage operations in China. As described elsewhere in this Annual Report, these benefits are no longer available to most companies operating in Shenzhen, including foreign-owned entities. In fact, the costs and burdens on foreign owned companies may be greater than on local companies. The cost of operating a manufacturing business in Shenzhen have increased significantly recently, including in particular the cost of labor and the cost of renting manufacturing facilities. In addition, recent actions by the Chinese government, including heightened governmental inspections of foreign-owned enterprises and additional administrative requirements imposed on foreign-owned entities, have during the past few years further significantly increased the costs and burdens of operating in China. These changes have now effectively removed the benefits of being a foreign owned enterprise, and now make it more burdensome to operate in China as a foreign-owned entity than as a locally owned enterprise. Furthermore, the local authorities have recently started requiring that companies operating in Shenzhen must be designated as “high technology” companies according to their standards. The Company currently is applying to obtain the a required high technology designation, but there is no assurance that the Company’s operations in Shenzhen will enable it to qualify as a high technology company. Failure to obtain the required high technology label could prevent the Company from renewing its factory leases in Shenzhen with its governmental landlord, which would require the Company to relocate its Shenzhen operations and would also trigger a whole set of other consequences, including having to layoff its local employees and having to pay high the severance payments to those employees. These factors have significantly increased the cost of doing business in China in the past few years. As a result of the last few years of cost increases, the Company has had to increase its prices to its customers. The increased prices the Company had to charge its customers have resulted in the loss of some customers and the loss of some business from existing customers. Some of these customer have decided to source their products from other original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) that have a lower cost base than the Company has. The foregoing factors have adversely affected the Company’s net sales and gross margins. While the Company is trying to offset the increasing costs and burdens of doing business in China (primarily by increasing automation and moving labor intensive activities to Myanmar), no assurance can be given that in the longer term the Company will be able to continue to operate in China and/or prosper under the new and evolving business or regulatory conditions in China.

The Company’s Long Hua, Shenzhen, Leases Expire In February 2020, And The Termination Of The Leases Could Materially Change The Company’s Future Operations And Could Require the Company To Make Substantial Payments To Its Employees. The Company’s principal manufacturing facilities are currently still located in Long Hua, Shenzhen, China. These leases (the “Premises Leases”) expire on February 28, 2020. There is a risk that the landlord may not renew the Premises Leases at the end of their current terms, or may demand significantly higher rents or additional conditions under which the Company may not want to, or may not be able to, renew the Premises Leases. Because the Company has moved much of its manufacturing operations from Shenzhen to its new factory in Yangon, Myanmar, the Company no longer needs all of the buildings and space that it currently leases. Accordingly, the Company has been in discussions with its landlord to renew the Premises Leases. No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to successfully complete its negotiations with its landlord and that it will be able to continue to operate at its current Shenzhen facility after February 2020. If the Company is not able to reach a suitable agreement with its Shenzhen landlord before the leases expire in February 2020, the Company will have to relocate its manufacturing facility to another, as yet unidentified, location and facility. The Company believes that currently there are other alternative facilities available to the Company in or near Long Hua, Shenzhen. However, the number of such other facilities near its current location is limited, and the Company may not be able to find facilities that suit its needs, are in a geographically desirable area, and that are financially acceptable. If the Premises Leases are not renewed and the Company has to relocate its facilities, in whole or in part, the relocation of the Company’s sole manufacturing facilities to alternative facilities will be costly, will materially disrupt the Company’s operations, could require the Company to pay increased rent and fees, and could adversely affect the Company’s operations, its business, and its financial condition during the relocation. In addition, under China’s labor laws, depending on where the Company relocates its manufacturing facilities, the Company’s employees could be entitled to receive employment termination payments, which payments in the aggregate could be substantial. Although the Company has been accruing payments as a liability on its financial statements, the early payment of these accrued amounts could result in a significant, and sudden decrease in the Company’s cash reserves. Accordingly, the expiration and non-renewal of the Premises Leases could have a material negative adverse impact on the Company’s operations and financial condition in the near future. No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to re-negotiate and extend the Premises Leases upon their expiration in February 2020 or that any such renewal will be on terms favorable to the Company.

Changing Internal Fiscal, Regulatory and Political Changes Continue to Negatively Affect The Company’s Operations in China . Most of the Company’s key functions, including tool design and manufacturing, engineering, administration, and automated manufacturing, are conducted from the Company’s facilities in China. As a result, the Company’s operations and assets are affected by the political, economic, legal and other uncertainties associated with doing business in China. Changes in policies by the Chinese government to its laws, regulations, or the interpretation thereof, the imposition of confiscatory taxation, restrictions on imports and sources of supply, currency re-valuations, or the expropriation of private enterprises, could materially adversely affect the Company. For example, the Chinese government has recently been imposing burdensome import regulations on companies, such as the Company, that heavily rely on imports of raw materials. In addition, foreign owned enterprises, including the Company, have recently been subject to numerous governmental inspections and have been subjected to additional burdensome regulations and, on occasion, to cash penalties and fines. While the Company has, to date, been able to continue its operations in China despite these changes and additional burdens, no assurance can be given that the increasing regulations and the more restrictive government policies will not, in the future, cause the Company’s operations to become financially untenable or otherwise materially affect its business, operations and financial condition.

Political Or Trade Controversies Between China And The United States Could Harm The Company’s Operating Results Or Depress The Company’s Stock Price . Relations between the U.S. and China have during the past few years been strained as a result of various economic and geopolitical disputes between the countries. These political and economic issues have resulted in tariffs being imposed by both China and the U.S. and have resulting in the imposition of restrictions on the import/export of certain products. Although the Company does not sell much to the U.S. and does not import raw materials from the U.S., these actions could increase the costs of manufacturing or otherwise interfere with the Company’s operations in China. The Company, being a U.S. publicly listed company, could be perceived to be an American company and, as such, could face persecution in various forms from the government. In addition, the trade tensions between the U.S. and China have, indirectly, further increased the costs of operating in China. Also, strains between the U.S. and China could interfere with the ability of companies manufacturing in China from engaging in business with, or selling to the U.S. or to U.S. companies. These disruptions of the trade relations with the U.S. could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future business. While the current trade disputes with China to date have not directly materially affected the Company’s business, no assurance can be given that these and any other future controversies will not negatively affect the Company’s business and operations in China. In addition to the impact that the trade dispute may have on the Company’s business, the political and trade friction between the U.S. and China could adversely affect the prevailing market price for the Company’s Common Shares. Trade or political disputes between the U.S. and China could affect U.S. investors’ perception of Chinese manufacturing companies listed on U.S. stock markets, which could adversely affect the Company’s stock price.

Increased Wages And The Other Costs Of Labor in China Have a Material Negative Impact The Company’s Operations And Continue to Increase Its Operating Costs . Wages in China in general, and in Shenzhen in particular, have significantly increased during the past few years. Increases in wages has also result in increases in employer contributions for various mandatory social welfare benefits for Chinese employees that are based on percentages of their salaries. These increases in the cost of labor will continue to increase the Company’s operating costs, will reduce the Company’s gross margins, and could eventually require the Company to further increase the prices that it charges its customers. The effect of these increases in the prices of the Company’s products and services has resulted, and may continue to result, in the loss of customers who may seek, and are able to obtain, comparable products and services in lower-cost regions of the world or from certain local Chinese companies that receive governmental support of subsidies. During the past few fiscal years, some of the Company’s larger customers have been unwilling to pay the higher prices that the Company had to charge in response to higher cost of operations and, accordingly, the Company’s new sales have decreased. Future increases in the Company’s costs and in the prices that it charges its customers may result the loss of additional customers and in the loss of revenues, which could affect the Company’s financial results.

The Company Faces Numerous Risks In Its Expanding Operations In Myanmar . In response to increased costs and burdens of operating in China, and in order to partially insulate the Company’s manufacturing operations from the effects of the U.S./China trade and political disputes, the Company has decided to move most of the Company’s labor intensive work from Shenzhen, China, to Yangon, Myanmar (formerly Burma). Following decades of authoritarian rule, Myanmar recently enacted various political and economic reforms that have made it possible for foreign businesses to operate in Myanmar, and to own an interest in Myanmar companies. In addition, the U.S. and European Union recently lifted many trade sanctions with Myanmar. As a result, a number of international and other enterprises have started acquiring interests in businesses in Myanmar. In March 2015 the Company acquired 75% of Kayser Myanmar Manufacturing Company Ltd. (“Kayser Myanmar”), a foreign company authorized to operate in Myanmar. In January 2017 the Company increased its ownership interest in Kayser Myanmar to 84%. Earlier in 2019, Kayser Myanmar moved its Yangon operations to a larger and newer factory facility and Yangon. The Company continues to transfer manufacturing equipment from its Shenzhen, China, operations the Kayser Myanmar facilities in order to enable the Myanmar company to assemble and manufacture more of the Company’s products in Myanmar. In addition to the assembly services currently performed in Myanmar, the Company recently commenced transferring some of its component manufacturing equipment to Myanmar. However, operating in an underdeveloped country such as Myanmar is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. These risks include the labor relations issues (including strikes), lack of infrastructure, uncertain rules and regulations, unpredictable access to utilities (including electricity), cultural and political issues with local governmental authorities, and the lack of international financing expertise. Because the Company is continuing to shift production from China to Myanmar, the impact of negative events in Myanmar will have a more significant impact on the Company in the future. The operations in Myanmar also are subject to the currency risks associated with the Myanmar Kyat (MMK), the official currency of that country. Myanmar recently permitted the exchange rate between the Kyat and the U.S. dollar to fluctuate, which fluctuations could materially change the cost of operating in Myanmar. No assurance can be given that unfavorable currency fluctuations will not occur in the future.

Wages In Myanmar Have Recently Increased Substantially and are Expected to Continue to Increase, Which Could Affect the Company’s Future Operations in Myanmar. The Company decided to establish its manufacturing operations in Myanmar in large part because of the lower wages paid to workers in Myanmar. However, the Myanmar government has recently made material changes to the labor laws in Myanmar and has increased wages, which labor law changes and increased wages could make operating in Myanmar by Kayser Myanmar more expensive and difficult. Since the Company’s plan is to shift much of its expensive and highly regulated work from its China facility to Kayser Myanmar, increasing the cost of labor and imposing additional regulations in Myanmar may make the future operations in Myanmar economically less beneficial than anticipated. No assurance can be given that Kayser Myanmar will be able to operate in a cost efficient manner in the future. Should Kayser Myanmar continue to experience increased costs and regulatory restrictions, the Company may lose the low cost benefits of operating in Myanmar that it was expecting in order to continue to service its larger clients.

The Company’s Customers May Restrict, Or Prohibit, Their Products To Be Manufactured In Myanmar, Which Would Negatively Affect The Company’s Plans To Shift Much Of Its Assembly and Manufacturing Operations To Myanmar . Shifting part of its assembly and manufacturing operations from the higher cost operations in China to the new lower cost facility in Myanmar is part of the Company’s business plan to retain its existing customers and to increase its competitiveness in the OEM marketplace. Accordingly, it is becoming increasingly important that that the Company’s customers agree to have their products manufactured in Yangon, Myanmar. To date, some of the Company’s customers have refused to have their products manufactured in Myanmar. While the quality of the products manufactured at Kayser Myanmar has satisfied those customers who have tested the quality of the products manufactured in Myanmar, other customers have been reluctant to permit the Company to outsource the manufacture of their products to the Myanmar assembly facility because of political and public relations issues. For example, the Rohingya humanitarian crisis, and the Myanmar government’s actions in expelling many Rohingya from Myanmar, have further tarnished Myanmar’s unfavorable human rights record. As a result of Myanmar’s reputation and this refugee crisis, many global brands, including several of the Company’s customers, have reduced or stopped the manufacture of their products in Myanmar. In the event that the Company’s customers prohibit the Company from manufacturing their products in Myanmar, the Company’s operations and financial condition will be significantly and adversely affected. To date, none of the Company’s customers has terminated any manufacturing orders with the Company as a result of the Rohingya crisis. However, no assurance can be given that customers will not, in the future, withdraw their work from Myanmar. The Company currently is unable to estimate what effect the Royhingya crisis, or other political events, will have on the Company’s future net sales and financial condition.

Uncertain Legal System and Application of Laws May Adversely Affect The Company’s Properties And Operations In Both China And Myanmar . The legal systems of China and Myanmar are often unclear and are continually evolving, and there can be no certainty as to the application of laws and regulations in particular instances. While China has an increasingly comprehensive system of laws, the application of these laws by the existing regional and local authorities is often in conflict and subject to inconsistent interpretation, implementation and enforcement. New laws and changes to existing laws occur quickly, sometimes unpredictably, and often arbitrarily. As is the case with all businesses operating in both China and Myanmar, the Company often is also required to comply with informal laws and trade practices imposed by local and regional administrators. Local taxes and other charges are levied depending on the local needs for tax revenues and may not be predictable or evenly applied. These local and regional taxes/charges and governmentally imposed business practices often affect the Company’s cost of doing business and require the Company to constantly modify its business methods to both comply with these local rules and to lessen the financial impact and operational interference of such policies. While the Company has, to date, been able to increase its compliance with the regulations and operate within the newly enforced rules and business practices in China, no assurance can be given that it will continue to be able to do so in the future. Should the local or regional governments or administrators impose new practices or levies that the Company cannot effectively respond to, or should the administrators continue to enforce more of those rules that they have not previously enforced, the Company’s operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted. The Company’s ability to appeal many of the local and regionally imposed laws and regulations is limited, and the Company may not be able to seek adequate redress for laws that materially damage its business. The Chinese judiciary is relatively inexperienced in enforcing the laws that exist, leading to a higher than usual degree of uncertainty as to the outcome of any litigation. Even where adequate laws do exist in China, it may not be possible to obtain swift and equitable enforcement of that law.

The Company’s Operations In Myanmar Are Dependent Upon Its Newly Leased Factory Complex In Yangon, Myanmar, And The Loss Or Interference With That Lease Would Materially, And Adversely, Affect The Company’s Operations In Myanmar . On March 29, 2019 Kayser Myanmar entered into a 50-year lease for an approximately 6,900 square meter (1.67 acres) factory estate in Yangon. Kayser Myanmar has advanced $950,000 to the landlord as a prepayment of rent under the lease (at today’s currency conversion rate, the prepayment represents approximately 12 years of rental payments), and has, to date, spent approximately $500,000 on refurbishing the complex and adding two new factory buildings and a new office building at the site. Accordingly, this new facility represents a significant long-term investment by the Company in its operations in Myanmar. All of Kayser Myanmar’s operations will be conducted at this new facility. Any interference or interruption of Kayser Myanmar’s right to operate that this new facility, as a result of a dispute with the landlord or because of any actions or regulations by Myanmar governmental or administrative authorities, could materially negatively affect the Company’s investment in the new factory and its ability to operate in Myanmar.

Labor Shortages and Employee Turnover . One of the principal economic advantages of locating the Company’s operations in China and Myanmar has been the availability of low cost labor. Due to the enormous growth in manufacturing in China, workers’ higher salary expectations, and the after effects of China’s one-child policy, the Company has recently experienced difficulty in filling its lower cost labor needs in China. In addition to the recently developing tight labor market, the Company has also been affected by cyclical trends and other shortages in labor supply. The Company regularly faces severe labor shortages in Shenzhen as a result of the Chinese New Year during which time the Company follows the customary practice at its factory complex to grant its employees home leave and to, therefore, temporarily discontinuing operations. Any material or prolonged shortage of labor would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations. As a result of the high cost of labor, the changing nature of the labor market, and the departure of employees that typically occurs during the Chinese New Year, many of the Company’s assembly workers have to be replaced every year. Due in part to these wage increases and labor shortages, the Company has stopped most of its labor intensive manufacturing in China and now uses its Shenzhen facilities mostly for engineering, tool manufacturing, design and administrative purposes. Since these functions are performed by higher paid professional employees, the Company’s exposure to the labor issues in China has been reduced. However, the cost and risks of hiring and training new employees has shifted to Myanmar as the Company now performs most of its labor intensive manufacturing in Myanmar. Myanmar also observes an extended new year’s celebration during which all workers leave, which requires the Company to annually hire, and train, new workers.

Import Duties and Restrictions May Negatively Affect The Company’s Operations and Liquidity. China is increasingly regulating and monitoring imports of raw materials and parts by manufacturers in China, which regulations make it more burdensome and expensive to import the materials the Company needs to manufacture its products. Failure by the Company or by third parties who perform transportation services for the Company to comply with the import regulations can lead to financial penalties on the Company, to additional restrictions on import activities, and could even result in the prohibition of future duty free import/exports by the Company. Any such prohibition would adversely affect the Company’s business and operations. No assurance can be given that the Company or its transportation service providers will be able to, or will in fact fully comply with the increased import regulations.

Risks Related To The Company’s Operations, Structure And Strategy.

The Company Is Financially Dependent On A Few Major Customers. During the years ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 the Company’s aggregate sales to its five largest customers accounted for approximately 89.4% and 89.7% of net sales respectively. While the Company previously believed that there are material benefits to limiting its customer base to a few, large, well-established and financially strong customers, the Company also acknowledges that having fewer customers also has significant risks. The Company’s success will depend to a significant extent on maintaining its major customers and on the success achieved by its major customers. The Company could be materially adversely affected if it loses one or more of its major customers or if the business and operations of its existing major customers declines. While the Company has in the past either been able to replace major customers or to increase the amount of orders it receives from its remaining customers, no assurance can be given that the Company will be able to do so in the future. In addition, with few, larger customers, the Company’s operations are more significantly impacted by a delay or reduction of any anticipated purchase orders or by the loss of any one or more of its major customers. The Company’s revenues have decreased during each of the past three years due to a reduction in sales to certain of the Company’s largest customers and the difficulty that the Company has had in attracting new customers. In the event that the Company is not able to attract new customers or obtain increased orders from its existing customers, the Company’s revenues in the current fiscal year ending March 31, 2020 could continue to decline and be less than the revenues in the prior fiscal years.

In addition to its increasing dependence on generating revenues from fewer, larger customers, the Company’s risk exposure to the collection of its accounts receivable likewise is increasing as the size of receivables from individual clients increases. A substantial portion of the Company’s sales to its major customers are made on credit, which exposes the Company to the risk of significant revenue loss if a major customer is unable to honor its credit obligations to the Company. Any material delay in being paid by its larger customers, or any default by a major customer on its obligations to the Company would significantly and adversely affect the Company’s liquidity. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, accounts receivable from the five customers with the largest receivable balances at year-end represented, in the aggregate, 89.5% and 89.2% of the total outstanding receivables, respectively.

Transactions Between The Company And Its Subsidiaries May Be Subject To Scrutiny By Various Tax Authorities And Could Expose The Company To Additional Taxes . The Company operates through various subsidiaries in various countries. These subsidiaries make inter-company purchases at various prices. Under China’s enterprise income tax law, all such inter-company transactions have to be made on an arm’s-length basis and are subject to scrutiny as transfer pricing transactions between related parties. Transactions between the various subsidiaries located inside and outside of China must also meet China’s transfer pricing documentation requirements that include the basis for determining pricing between the related entities, as well as the computation methodology. The Company could face material and adverse consequences if the Chinese tax authorities determine that transactions between the Company’s various subsidiaries do not represent arm’s-length pricing regulations and, therefore, that such transactions are deemed to be structured to avoid taxes. Such a determination could result in increased tax liabilities of the affected subsidiaries and potentially subject the Company to late payment interest and other penalties.

The Company Is Highly Dependent Upon Its Executive Officers And Its Other Managers . The Company is highly dependent upon Roland Kohl, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and its other officers and managers. Although the Company has signed employment contracts with Mr. Kohl and certain of its other key officers/managers, no assurance can be given that those employees will remain with the Company during the terms of their employment agreements. The loss of the services of any of the foregoing persons would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and operations. For example, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer unexpectedly died in 2017, which caused significant disruption in the Company’s operations and uncertainty with the Company’s customers. Mr. Kohl’s current employment agreement, was recently extended and revised so that his compensation can be reduced by 50% if the Company experiences losses in any fiscal quarter. The Company owns a $2,000,000 life insurance policy issued to insure the Company’s in the event of Mr. Kohl’s death. In addition, the Myanmar operations are highly dependent upon that facilities’ Managing Director (who also is its co-founder). Should the Myanmar co-founder leave, the Myanmar operations could be materially affected, and the Company could have difficulty in finding a replacement.

The Company Must Continuously Adapt Its Operations To Suit Its Customers’ Needs, Or Else It Will Lose Customers. The Company’s customers are continuously changing the mix of their products. Accordingly, the Company must continuously adapt its manufacturing abilities to suit the needs of its customers. No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to detect and correctly react to future changes in the needs of its principal customers, or that its investments in equipment and machinery made in anticipation of such changes will result in a positive return. Should the Company fail to react, or to incorrectly react to changes in the needs of its current or future customers, its business, operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

The Company Faces Significant Competition From Numerous Larger, Better Capitalized, and International Competitors. The Company competes against numerous manufacturers for all of its current products. Such competition arises from both third party manufacturers and from the in–house manufacturing capabilities of existing customers. To a large extent, the Company competes in its OEM business on the basis of quality, price, service, and the ability to deliver products on a reliable basis. Due to significant competition and the availability of alternate OEM suppliers for the Company’s customers, the Company has, at times, been reluctant, or even unable to pass through significant materials cost increases. This has, at times, led to lower gross margins and even to net losses in some product lines. During the past few years, the Company has also lost manufacturing contracts because of its price increases, which losses have resulted in lower net sales. As a result of these factors, the Company will have to continue to operate at narrow gross profit margins, which could jeopardize the Company’s financial position.

Since locating its facilities in Shenzhen, China, in 1991, the Company has been able to compete with other manufacturers based on its cost of operations in Shenzhen, the availability of a large labor pool, its favorable tax status, and its convenient access to Hong Kong’s shipping port and business/banking facilities. However, since the Company first moved to Shenzhen as one of the first manufacturers in that locality, many other manufacturers have re-located or established new facilities in Shenzhen, and the Company’s competitive advantage has been significantly diminished. In addition, many of the larger, international companies that have established competing facilities in Shenzhen have also established manufacturing facilities in other low-cost manufacturing locations, many located outside of China, which have given those competitors the ability to shift their manufacturing to those locations whenever costs at those other locations are cheaper than in Shenzhen. Accordingly, the Company has indirectly been competing against both the competitors in Shenzhen as well as the other facilities outside of China. The significantly increases in the cost of operating in China, including changes in labor laws, changes in environmental regulations and in the enforcement of such regulations, increases in safety regulations, and a general increase in the cost of doing business have all collectively eroded many of the advantages of operating in China. No assurance can be given that the Company will continue to be able to compete effectively against companies based in China or, in particular, those operating outside of China.

Fluctuation in Foreign Currency Exchange Rates Will Continue to Affect the Company’s Operations and Profitability. Because the Company engages in international trade and operates using three different currencies, the Company is subject to the risks of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The Company’s operations are based in the PRC, Hong Kong and in Myanmar. However, because most the Company’s customers are located outside of these markets (primarily in Europe), the Company makes and/or receives payments in various currencies (including U.S. dollars, Hong Kong dollars, RMB and Euros), and pays its expenses in RMB, Hong Kong dollars, and MMK. As a result, the Company is exposed to the risks associated with possible foreign currency controls, currency exchange rate fluctuations or devaluations. For example, the Company realized a currency exchange gain of $63,000 in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, but incurred currency exchange losses of $8,000, $19,000 and $21,000 in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2019, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Currency fluctuations have in the past been more significant and have, in those prior years, materially affected the Company’s financial results. Notwithstanding these currency conversion rate fluctuations, the Company does not attempt to hedge its currency exchange risks and, therefore, will continue to experience certain gains or losses due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company does attempt to limit its currency exchange rate exposure in certain of its OEM contracts through contractual provisions, which may limit, though not eliminate, these currency risks. In addition, the Company has an understanding with many of its larger European customers that the Company’s quoted prices will be periodically adjusted to reflect currency exchange rate fluctuations. The Company is also attempting to limit its exposure to currency fluctuations with its non-U.S. based customers by increasingly asking for payment in U.S. dollars. Nevertheless, no assurance can be given that the Company will not suffer future currency exchange rate losses that will materially impact the Company’s financial results and condition.

The Company is Exposed to Significant Worldwide Political, Economic, Legal And Other Risks Related To Its International Operations. The Company is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, has administrative offices for its subsidiaries in Hong Kong, and has all of its manufacturing facilities in China and Myanmar. The Company sells its products to customers in Europe, Hong Kong, North America and elsewhere in Asia. As a result, its operations are subject to significant political and economic risks and legal uncertainties, including changes in international and domestic customs regulations, changes in tariffs, trade restrictions, trade agreements and taxation, changes in economic and political conditions and in governmental policies, difficulties in managing or overseeing foreign operations, and wars, civil unrest, acts of terrorism and other conflicts. The occurrence or consequences of any of these factors may restrict the Company’s ability to operate in the affected region and decrease the profitability of the Company’s operations in that region.

Acquisitions Or Strategic Investments, Including The Recent Expansion Into Myanmar, May Not Be Successful And May Harm The Company’s Operating Results . The Company has in the past, and may in the future, acquire, invest in, or enter into strategic arrangements with other companies in China and elsewhere (including elsewhere in Asia, Europe or even in North or Central America). For example, as part of its strategy to reduce some of its operating expenses, in the past few years the Company acquired an 84% interest in a Myanmar company and a 51% interest in a venture that it co-owns with ACI Group GmbH, a company based in Zimmern o. R., Germany. The Company’s investments in Myanmar have, to date, met the Company’s goals. However, the Company’s much smaller investment in the German company that is established to manufacture proprietary CO ₂ cleaning systems for industrial and commercial cleaning applications, has not been a success. Such acquisitions or strategic investments could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and operating results because of:

Risks Related To Regulatory Oversight And The Company’s Charter.

Certain Legal Consequences of Incorporation in the British Virgin Islands . The Company is incorporated under the laws of the British Virgin Islands, and its corporate affairs are governed by its Amended and Restated Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association and by the BVI Business Companies Act of the British Virgin Islands. Principles of law relating to such matters as the validity of corporate procedures, the fiduciary duties of the Company’s management, directors and controlling shareholders and the rights of the Company’s shareholders differ from those that would apply if the Company were incorporated in a jurisdiction within the U.S. Further, the rights of shareholders under British Virgin Islands law are not as clearly established as the rights of shareholders under legislation or judicial precedent in existence in most U.S. jurisdictions. Thus, the public shareholders of the Company may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions of the management, directors or controlling shareholders than they might have as shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a U.S. jurisdiction. In addition, there is doubt that the courts of the British Virgin Islands would enforce, either in an original action or in an action for enforcement of judgments of U.S. courts, liabilities that are predicated upon the securities laws of the U.S.

The Company’s Recently Enacted Rights Plan And Certain Provisions of Its Amended and Restated Memorandum And Articles of Association May Discourage a Change of Control . In April 2018, the Company adopted a shareholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”) that provides for the issuance of one right (“Right”) for each of our outstanding common shares. The Rights are designed to assure that all shareholders receive fair and equal treatment in the event of any proposed takeover and to guard against partial tender offers, open market accumulations, undisclosed voting arrangements and other abusive or coercive tactics to gain control of the Company or the Board of Directors without paying all shareholders a control premium. The Rights will cause substantial dilution to a person or group that acquires 15% or more of the Common Shares on terms not approved by our board of directors. The Rights Plan may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of the Company or management that shareholders may consider favorable.

Some provisions of the Company’s Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association also may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of the Company or management, including provisions that 1) provide that a meeting of shareholders can be called only by the Company’s Board of Directors, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, or President and not by shareholders; (2) provide that directors of the Company may be removed only for cause, and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds in voting power of the outstanding shares; and (3) require a vote of at least two-thirds in voting power of the outstanding shares to amend these and certain other provisions of the Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association.

These provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire the Company, even if the third party’s offer may be considered beneficial by many shareholders. As a result, shareholders may be limited in their ability to obtain a premium for their shares.

It May be Difficult to Serve the Company with Legal Process or Enforce Judgments Against the Company’s Management or the Company. The Company is a British Virgin Islands holding corporation with subsidiaries in Hong Kong, Myanmar and China. Substantially, all of the Company’s assets are located in the PRC and Myanmar, and no assets, employees or operations are located in the U.S. In addition, most of the Company’s directors and all of its executive officers reside outside of the U.S. It may not be possible to effect service of process within the United States or elsewhere outside the PRC, Myanmar or Hong Kong upon the Company’s directors, or executive officers, including effecting service of process with respect to matters arising under United States federal securities laws or applicable state securities laws. The PRC does not have treaties providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments of courts with the United States and many other countries. As a result, recognition and enforcement in the PRC or Myanmar of judgments of a court in the United States or many other jurisdictions in relation to any matter, including securities laws, may be difficult or impossible.

No treaty exists between Hong Kong or the British Virgin Islands and the United States providing for the reciprocal enforcement of foreign judgments. However, the courts of Hong Kong and the British Virgin Islands are generally prepared to accept a foreign judgment as evidence of a debt due. An action may then be commenced in Hong Kong or the British Virgin Islands for recovery of this debt. A Hong Kong or British Virgin Islands court will only accept a foreign judgment as evidence of a debt due if various conditions are met, including the condition that the judgment is for a liquidated amount in a civil matter, the foreign court has taken jurisdiction on grounds that are recognized by the common law rules as to conflict of laws in Hong Kong or the British Virgin Islands, the proceedings in which the judgment was obtained, the judgment itself and the enforcement of the judgment are not contrary to the public policy of Hong Kong or the British Virgin Islands, and the person against whom the judgment is given is subject to the jurisdiction of the Hong Kong or the British Virgin Islands court.

Enforcement of a foreign judgment in Hong Kong or the British Virgin Islands may also be limited or affected by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, arrangement and moratorium, or similar laws relating to or affecting creditors’ rights generally, and will be subject to a statutory limitation of time within which proceedings may be brought.

Risks Related To The Common Shares.

Volatility Of Market Price Of the Company’s Shares. The markets for equity securities have been volatile, and the price of the Company’s Common Shares has been and could continue to be subject to material fluctuations in response to quarter to quarter variations in operating results, news announcements, trading volume, general market trends both domestically and internationally, currency movements and interest rate fluctuations.

Exemptions Under The Exchange Act As A Foreign Private Issuer . The Company is a foreign private issuer within the meaning of rules promulgated under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). As such, and though its Common Shares are registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act, it is exempt from certain provisions of the Exchange Act applicable to United States public companies including: the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the Commission of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or current reports on Form 8-K; the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations with respect to a security registered under the Exchange Act; the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and establishing insider liability for profits realized from any “short-swing” trading transaction (i.e., a purchase and sale, or sale and purchase, of the issuer’s equity securities within six months or less), and the provisions of Regulation FD aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information. In addition, certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 do not apply to the Company. Because of the exemptions under the Exchange Act and Sarbanes-Oxley Act applicable to foreign private issuers, shareholders of the Company are not afforded the same protections or information generally available to investors in public companies organized in the United States.

Failure To Establish And Maintain Effective Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting Could Have A Material And Adverse Effect On The Accuracy In Reporting Our Financial Results Or Preventing Fraud . We are subject to the reporting obligations under the U.S. securities laws. The SEC, as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report of management on the effectiveness of such companies’ internal control over financial reporting in its annual report. Because of the difficulty in hiring and keeping highly qualified accounting personnel and the high cost of maintaining proper internal controls, management may not be able to conclude that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is fully effective. These possible outcomes could result in an adverse reaction in the financial marketplace due to a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our reporting processes, which in turn could harm the Company’s business and negatively impact the trading price of the Company’s common shares. In addition, the SEC’s requirement that the Company must maintain effective financial controls and systems also is applicable to the Company’s new majority-owned Myanmar subsidiary. Although the Company has implemented its company-wide financial controls at the Myanmar facility, because of the lack of familiarity with U.S. controls and procedures, language issues and the training of its personnel, no assurance can be given that the Myanmar financial controls will be sufficient to prevent fraud or financial reporting inaccuracies.

While The Company Has In The Past Paid Dividends, No Assurance Can Be Given That The Company Will Declare Or Pay Cash Dividends In The Future. The Company’s policy has been to pay a cash dividend at least once a year to all holders of its Common Shares, subject to its profitability and cash position. The Company made four dividend payments in each of the past two years (a total of $0.35 per share in fiscal 2019, and $0.29 per share in fiscal 2018). However, the Company did not declare or pay a dividend in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. Dividends are declared and payable at the discretion of the Board of Directors and depend upon, among other things, the Company’s net profit after taxes, the anticipated future earnings of the Company, the success of the Company’s business activities, the Company’s capital requirements, and the general financial conditions of the Company. Although it is the Company’s intention to pay dividends during profitable fiscal years, the Company does not expect to pay dividends during periods when the Company’s operations have not been profitable, or when the Company uses a material amount of its financial resources for long-term capital investments. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the Company will pay dividends in fiscal 2020, or that the Company will pay any dividends in the future even if it has a profitable year or is otherwise capable of doing so. If the Company does not pay a cash dividend, the Company’s shareholders will not realize a return on their investment in the Common Shares except to the extent of any appreciation in the value of the Common Shares. 

Risk of Cybersecurity Breaches. Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise the Company’s information and expose the Company to liability, which would cause the Company’s business and reputation to suffer. In the ordinary course of the Company’s business, the Company stores sensitive data, including business information and regarding its customers, suppliers and business partners, in the Company’s networks. The secure maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to the Company’s operations. Despite the Company’s security measures, its information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise the Company’s networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, regulatory penalties, disrupt the Company’s operations, and damage the Company’s reputation, which could adversely affect its business, revenues and competitive position.

The Audit Report Included In This Annual Report is Prepared By Auditors Who Are Not Inspected By The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board And, As Such, You Are Deprived Of The Benefits Of Such Inspection. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that issues the audit report included in the Company’s annual reports filed with the SEC, as auditors of companies that are traded publicly in the United States and a firm registered with the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (the “PCAOB”), is required by the laws of the United States to undergo regular inspections by the PCAOB to assess its compliance with the laws of the United States and professional standards.

Because the Company has substantial operations within the PRC and the PCAOB is currently unable to conduct inspections of the work of the Company’s auditors as it relates to those operations without the approval of the Chinese authorities, the Company’s auditors are not currently inspected fully by the PCAOB.

Inspections of other firms that the PCAOB has conducted outside China have identified deficiencies in those firms’ audit procedures and quality control procedures, which may be addressed as part of the inspection process to improve future audit quality. This lack of PCAOB inspections in China prevents the PCAOB from regularly evaluating the Company’s auditor’s audits and its quality control procedures. As a result, investors may be deprived of the benefits of PCAOB inspections.

On May 24, 2013, PCAOB announced that it had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on Enforcement Cooperation with the China Securities Regulatory Commission (the “CSRC”), and the Ministry of Finance which establishes a cooperative framework between the parties for the production and exchange of audit documents relevant to investigations in the United States and China. On inspection, it appears that the PCAOB continues to be in discussions with the Mainland China regulators to permit inspections of audit firms that are registered with PCAOB in relation to the audit of Chinese companies that trade on U.S. exchanges. On December 7, 2018, the SEC and the PCAOB issued a joint statement highlighting continued challenges faced by the U.S. regulators in their oversight of financial statement audits of U.S.-listed companies with significant operations in China. The joint statement reflects a heightened interest in this issue. However, it remains unclear what further actions the SEC and PCAOB will take and its impact on Chinese companies listed in the U.S.

The inability of the PCAOB to conduct full inspections of auditors in the PRC makes it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s audit procedures or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside the PRC that are subject to PCAOB inspections. Investors may lose confidence in the Company’s reported financial information and procedures and the quality of the Company’s financial statements.

If The Settlement Reached Between The SEC And The Big Four PRC-Based Accounting Firms (Including The Chinese Affiliate Of The Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm), Concerning The Manner In Which The SEC May Seek Access To Audit Working Papers From Audits In China Of US-Listed Companies, Is Not Or Cannot Be Performed In A Manner Acceptable To Authorities In China And The US, We Could Be Unable To Timely File Future Financial Statements In Compliance With The Requirements Of The Exchange Act. In late 2012, the SEC commenced administrative proceedings under Rule 102(e) of its Rules of Practice and also under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 against the mainland Chinese affiliates of the “Big Four” accounting firms (including the mainland Chinese affiliate of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm). A first instance trial of the proceedings in July 2013 in the SEC’s internal administrative court resulted in an adverse judgment against the firms. The administrative law judge proposed penalties on the Chinese accounting firms including a temporary suspension of their right to practice before the SEC, although that proposed penalty did not take effect pending review by the Commissioners of the SEC. On February 6, 2015, before a review by the Commissioner had taken place, the Chinese accounting firms reached a settlement with the SEC whereby the proceedings were stayed. Under the settlement, the SEC accepted that future requests by the SEC for the production of documents would normally be made to the CSRC. The Chinese accounting firms would receive requests matching those under Section 106 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and would be required to abide by a detailed set of procedures with respect to such requests, which in substance would require them to facilitate production via the CSRC. The CSRC for its part initiated a procedure whereby, under its supervision and subject to its approval, requested classes of documents held by the accounting firms could be sanitized of problematic and sensitive content so as to render them capable of being made available by the CSRC to US regulators.

Under the terms of the settlement, the underlying proceeding against the four PRC-based accounting firms was deemed dismissed with prejudice at the end of four years starting from the settlement date, which was on February 6, 2019. Despite the final ending of the proceedings, the presumption is that all parties will continue to apply the same procedures: i.e. the SEC will continue to make its requests for the production of documents to the CSRC, and the CSRC will normally process those requests applying the sanitation procedure. The Company cannot predict whether, in cases where the CSRC does not authorize production of requested documents to the SEC, the SEC will further challenge the four PRC-based accounting firms’ compliance with U.S. law. If additional challenges are imposed on the Chinese affiliates of the “big four” accounting firms, the Company could be unable to timely file future financial statements in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act.

In the event that the SEC restarts the administrative proceedings, depending upon the final outcome listed companies in the United States with major PRC operations may find it difficult or impossible to retain auditors in respect of their operations in the PRC, which could result in financial statements being determined to not be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, including possible delisting. Moreover, any negative news about any such future proceedings against these accounting firms may cause investor uncertainty regarding China-based, United States-listed companies and the market price of the Company’s ADSs may be adversely affected.

If the Chinese affiliate of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm were denied, even temporarily, the ability to practice before the SEC and the Company was unable to timely find another registered public accounting firm to audit and issue an opinion on the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s financial statements could be determined not to be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act. Such a determination could ultimately lead to the delisting of the Company’s common shares from Nasdaq or deregistration from the SEC, or both, which would substantially reduce or effectively terminate the trading of the Company’s common shares.