UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
þ
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

Or

¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to         

Commission file number: 001-34046
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
 
26-1075808
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1201 Lake Robbins Drive
The Woodlands, Texas
 
77380
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)

(832) 636-6000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Common Units Representing Limited Partner Interests
 
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes   þ     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes   ¨     No   þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   þ      No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   þ      No   ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10- K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ
 
Accelerated filer ¨
 
Non-accelerated filer ¨
 
Smaller reporting company ¨
 
Emerging growth company ¨
 
 
 
 
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
 
 
 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.     ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   ¨     No   þ

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common units representing limited partner interests held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $5.6 billion on June 30, 2017, based on the closing price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

At February 12, 2018 , there were 152,602,105 common units outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None




TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
1 and 2.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1A.
1B.
3.
4.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.
 
 
 
6.
7.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7A.
8.
9.
9A.
9B.


2


Item
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.
16.


3

Table of Contents

COMMONLY USED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Partnership” or “Western Gas Partners, LP” refer to Western Gas Partners, LP and its subsidiaries. As used in this Form 10-K , the terms and definitions below have the following meanings:
Additional DBJV System Interest: Our additional 50% interest in the DBJV system acquired from a third party in March 2017.
AESC: Anadarko Energy Services Company.
Affiliates: Subsidiaries of Anadarko, excluding us, but including equity interests in Fort Union, White Cliffs, Rendezvous, the Mont Belvieu JV, TEP, TEG, and FRP.
AMH: APC Midstream Holdings, LLC.
AMM: Anadarko Marcellus Midstream, L.L.C.
Anadarko: Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries, excluding us and our general partner.
Barrel or Bbl: 42 U.S. gallons measured at 60 degrees Fahrenheit.
Bbls/d: Barrels per day.
Board of Directors or Board: The board of directors of our general partner.
Btu: British thermal unit; the approximate amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit.
Chipeta: Chipeta Processing, LLC.
Chipeta LLC agreement: Chipeta’s limited liability company agreement, as amended and restated as of July 23, 2009.
Condensate: A natural gas liquid with a low vapor pressure mainly composed of propane, butane, pentane and heavier hydrocarbon fractions.
Cryogenic: The process in which liquefied gases are used to bring natural gas volumes to very low temperatures (below approximately -238 degrees Fahrenheit) to separate natural gas liquids from natural gas. Through cryogenic processing, more natural gas liquids are extracted than when traditional refrigeration methods are used.
DBJV: Delaware Basin JV Gathering LLC.
DBJV system: A gathering system and related facilities located in the Delaware Basin in Loving, Ward, Winkler and Reeves Counties in West Texas.
DBM: Delaware Basin Midstream, LLC.
DBM complex: The cryogenic processing plants, gas gathering system, and related facilities and equipment in West Texas that serve production from Reeves, Loving and Culberson Counties, Texas and Eddy and Lea Counties, New Mexico.
DBM water systems: Two produced water disposal systems in West Texas.
Delivery point: The point where hydrocarbons are delivered by a processor or transporter to a producer, shipper or purchaser, typically the inlet at the interconnection between the gathering or processing system and the facilities of a third-party processor or transporter.
DJ Basin complex: The Platte Valley system, Wattenberg system and Lancaster plant, all of which were combined into a single complex in the first quarter of 2014.

4

Table of Contents

Drip condensate: Heavier hydrocarbon liquids that fall out of the natural gas stream and are recovered in the gathering system without processing.
Dry gas: A gas primarily composed of methane and ethane where heavy hydrocarbons and water either do not exist or have been removed through processing.
EBITDA: Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. For a definition of “Adjusted EBITDA,” see How We Evaluate Our Operations under Part II , Item 7 of this Form 10-K .
End-use markets: The ultimate users/consumers of transported energy products.
Equity investment throughput: Our 14.81% share of average Fort Union throughput, 22% share of average Rendezvous throughput, 10% share of average White Cliffs throughput, 25% share of average Mont Belvieu JV throughput, 20% share of average TEP and TEG throughput and 33.33% share of average FRP throughput.
Exchange Act: The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
FERC: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Fort Union: Fort Union Gas Gathering, LLC.
Fractionation: The process of applying various levels of higher pressure and lower temperature to separate a stream of natural gas liquids into ethane, propane, normal butane, isobutane and natural gasoline for end-use sale.
FRP: Front Range Pipeline LLC.
GAAP: Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
General partner: Western Gas Holdings, LLC.
Gpm: Gallons per minute, when used in the context of amine treating capacity.
Hydraulic fracturing: The injection of fluids into the wellbore to create fractures in rock formations, stimulating the production of oil or gas.
IDRs: Incentive distribution rights.
Imbalance: Imbalances result from (i) differences between gas and NGL volumes nominated by customers and gas and NGL volumes received from those customers and (ii) differences between gas and NGL volumes received from customers and gas and NGL volumes delivered to those customers.
IPO: Initial public offering.
Joule-Thompson (JT): A type of processing plant that uses the Joule-Thompson effect to cool natural gas by expanding the gas from a higher pressure to a lower pressure, which reduces the temperature.
LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate.
Marcellus Interest: Our 33.75% interest in the Larry’s Creek, Seely and Warrensville gas gathering systems and related facilities located in northern Pennsylvania.
MBbls/d: One thousand barrels per day.
MGR: Mountain Gas Resources, LLC.
MGR assets: The Red Desert complex and the Granger straddle plant.
MIGC: MIGC, LLC.
MLP: Master limited partnership.
MMBtu: One million British thermal units.

5

Table of Contents

MMcf: One million cubic feet.
MMcf/d: One million cubic feet per day.
Mont Belvieu JV: Enterprise EF78 LLC.
Natural gas liquid(s) or NGL(s): The combination of ethane, propane, normal butane, isobutane and natural gasolines that, when removed from natural gas, become liquid under various levels of higher pressure and lower temperature.
Non-Operated Marcellus Interest: The 33.75% interest in the Liberty and Rome gas gathering systems and related facilities located in northern Pennsylvania that was transferred to a third party in March 2017 pursuant to the Property Exchange.
NYSE: New York Stock Exchange.
NYMEX: New York Mercantile Exchange.
OTTCO: Overland Trail Transmission, LLC.
PIK Class C units: Additional Class C units issued as quarterly distributions to the holder of our Class C units.
Play: A group of gas or oil fields that contain known or potential commercial amounts of petroleum and/or natural gas.
Produced water: Byproduct associated with the production of crude oil and natural gas that often contains a number of dissolved solids and other materials found in oil and gas reservoirs.
Property Exchange : Our acquisition of the Additional DBJV System Interest from a third party in exchange for the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest and $155.0 million of cash consideration, as further described in our Forms 8-K filed with the SEC on February 9, 2017, and March 23, 2017.
RCF: Our $1.2 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility.
Receipt point: The point where hydrocarbons are received by or into a gathering system, processing facility or transportation pipeline.
Red Desert complex: The Patrick Draw processing plant, the Red Desert processing plant, associated gathering lines, and related facilities.
Refrigeration: A method of processing natural gas by reducing the gas temperature with the use of an external refrigeration system.
Rendezvous: Rendezvous Gas Services, LLC.
Residue: The natural gas remaining after the unprocessed natural gas stream has been processed or treated.
SEC: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Springfield: Springfield Pipeline LLC.
Springfield gas gathering system: A gas gathering system and related facilities located in Dimmit, La Salle, Maverick and Webb Counties in South Texas.
Springfield oil gathering system : An oil gathering system and related facilities located in Dimmit, La Salle, Maverick and Webb Counties in South Texas.
Springfield system : The Springfield gas gathering system and Springfield oil gathering system.
Stabilization: The process of separating very light hydrocarbon gases, methane and ethane in particular, from heavier hydrocarbon components. This process reduces the volatility of the liquids during transportation and storage.

6

Table of Contents

Tailgate: The point at which processed natural gas and/or natural gas liquids leave a processing facility for end-use markets.
TEFR Interests: The interests in TEP, TEG and FRP.
TEG: Texas Express Gathering LLC.
TEP: Texas Express Pipeline LLC.
Wellhead: The point at which the hydrocarbons and water exit the ground.
WES LTIP: With respect to awards granted prior to October 17, 2017, the Western Gas Partners, LP 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “WES 2008 LTIP”), which was adopted by our general partner in connection with our IPO in 2008, and, with respect to awards granted after October 17, 2017, the Western Gas Partners, LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which was approved by our common and Class C unitholders on October 17, 2017.
WGP: Western Gas Equity Partners, LP.
WGP GP: Western Gas Equity Holdings, LLC, the general partner of WGP.
WGP LTIP: Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
WGRI: Western Gas Resources, Inc.
White Cliffs: White Cliffs Pipeline, LLC.
2018 Notes: Our 2.600% Senior Notes due 2018.
2021 Notes: Our 5.375% Senior Notes due 2021.
2022 Notes: Our 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022.
2025 Notes: Our 3.950% Senior Notes due 2025.
2026 Notes: Our 4.650% Senior Notes due 2026.
2044 Notes: Our 5.450% Senior Notes due 2044.
$500.0 million COP: The continuous offering program that may be undertaken pursuant to the registration statement filed with the SEC in July 2017 for the issuance of up to an aggregate of $500.0 million of our common units.

7

Table of Contents

PART I

Items 1 and 2.  Business and Properties

GENERAL OVERVIEW

We are a growth-oriented Delaware MLP formed by Anadarko in 2007 to acquire, own, develop and operate midstream assets. We are engaged in the business of gathering, compressing, treating, processing and transporting natural gas; gathering, stabilizing and transporting condensate, NGLs and crude oil; and gathering and disposing of produced water. In addition, in our capacity as a processor of natural gas, we also buy and sell natural gas, NGLs or condensate under certain of our contracts. We provide these midstream services for Anadarko, as well as for third-party producers and customers. Our common units are publicly traded on the NYSE under the symbol “WES.”
WGP, a Delaware MLP formed by Anadarko in September 2012, owns our general partner and a significant limited partner interest in us. WGP’s common units are publicly traded on the NYSE under the symbol “WGP.” WGP GP is a wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko.

Available information.  We electronically file our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and other documents with the SEC under the Exchange Act. From time to time, we may also file registration and related statements pertaining to equity or debt offerings.
We provide access free of charge to all of these SEC filings, as soon as reasonably practicable after filing or furnishing such materials with the SEC, on our website located at www.westerngas.com . The public may also read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The public may also obtain such reports from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov .
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics for our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the charters of the Audit Committee and the Special Committee of our Board of Directors are also available on our website. We will also provide, free of charge, a copy of any of our governance documents listed above upon written request to our general partner’s corporate secretary at our principal executive office. Our principal executive offices are located at 1201 Lake Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, TX 77380-1046. Our telephone number is 832-636-6000.


8

Table of Contents

OUR ASSETS AND AREAS OF OPERATION

As of December 31, 2017 , our assets and investments consisted of the following:
 
 
Owned and
Operated
 
Operated
Interests
 
Non-Operated
Interests
 
Equity Interests
Gathering systems (1)
 
12

 
3

 
3

 
2

Treating facilities
 
19

 
3

 

 
3

Natural gas processing plants/trains
 
20

 
4

 

 
2

NGL pipelines
 
2

 

 

 
3

Natural gas pipelines
 
5

 

 

 

Oil pipelines
 

 
1

 

 
1

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Includes the DBM water systems.

These assets and investments are located in the Rocky Mountains (Colorado, Utah and Wyoming), North-central Pennsylvania, Texas and New Mexico. The following table provides information regarding our assets by geographic region, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 , excluding the Mentone processing plant at the DBM complex, which is currently under construction in West Texas (see Assets Under Development within these Items 1 and 2):
Area
 
Asset Type
 
Miles of Pipeline (1)
 
Approximate Number of Active Receipt Points   (1)
 
Compression (HP) (1)
 
Processing or Treating Capacity (MMcf/d) (1)
 
Processing, Treating or Disposal Capacity (MBbls/d) (1)
 
Average Gathering, Processing, Treating and Transportation Throughput (MMcf/d) (2)
 
Average Gathering, Treating, Transportation and Disposal Throughput (MBbls/d) (3)
Rocky Mountains
 
Gathering, Processing and Treating
 
7,414

 
4,665

 
515,032

 
3,127

 
14

 
2,095

 

 
 
Transportation
 
1,601

 
72

 
40,334

 

 

 
87

 
23

Texas / New Mexico
 
Gathering, Processing, Treating and Disposal
 
2,155

 
954

 
516,149

 
1,275

 
374

 
1,261

 
106

 
 
Transportation
 
1,195

 
16

 
39,748

 

 

 

 
72

North-central Pennsylvania
 
Gathering
 
144

 
49

 
6,900

 

 

 
237

 

Total
 
 
 
12,509

 
5,756

 
1,118,163

 
4,402

 
388

 
3,680

 
201

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
All system metrics are presented on a gross basis and include owned, rented and leased compressors at certain facilities. Includes horsepower associated with liquid pump stations.
(2)  
Includes 100% of Chipeta throughput, 50% of Newcastle throughput, 50.1% of Springfield gas gathering throughput, 22% of Rendezvous throughput and 14.81% of Fort Union throughput.
(3)  
Consists of throughput on the Chipeta NGL pipeline, an NGL line at the Brasada complex and at the DBM water systems, a 50.1% share of average Springfield oil gathering throughput, a 10% share of average White Cliffs throughput, a 25% share of average Mont Belvieu JV throughput, a 20% share of average TEG and TEP throughput and a 33.33% share of average FRP throughput. See Properties below for further descriptions of these systems.

Our operations are organized into a single operating segment that engages in gathering, compressing, treating, processing and transporting natural gas; gathering, stabilizing and transporting condensate, NGLs and crude oil; and gathering and disposing of produced water. We provide these midstream services for Anadarko, as well as for third-party producers and customers in the United States. See Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for disclosure of revenues, profits and total assets for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .


9

Table of Contents

ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES

Property exchange. On March 17, 2017, we acquired the Additional DBJV System Interest from a third party in exchange for the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest and $155.0 million of cash consideration. We previously held a 50% interest in, and operated, the DBJV system. The Property Exchange resulted in a net gain of $125.7 million recorded as Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations. See  Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures  in the  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .

Divestitures. During the second quarter of 2017, the Helper and Clawson systems, located in Utah, were sold to a third party, resulting in a net gain on sale of $16.3 million recorded as Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations.

Presentation of Partnership assets.   The term “Partnership assets” includes both the assets owned and the interests accounted for under the equity method by us as of December 31, 2017 (see Note 9—Equity Investments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K ). Because Anadarko controls us through its control of WGP, which owns the entire interest in our general partner, each of our acquisitions of Partnership assets from Anadarko has been considered a transfer of net assets between entities under common control. As such, the Partnership assets we acquired from Anadarko were initially recorded at Anadarko’s historic carrying value, which did not correlate to the total acquisition price paid by us (see Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K ). Further, after an acquisition of Partnership assets from Anadarko, we may be required to recast our financial statements to include the activities of such Partnership assets from the date of common control.

EQUITY OFFERINGS

Series A Preferred units. In 2016, we issued 21,922,831 Series A Preferred units to private investors. Pursuant to an agreement between us and the holders of the Series A Preferred units, 50% of the Series A Preferred units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis on March 1, 2017, and all remaining Series A Preferred units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis on May 2, 2017. See Note 4—Equity and Partners’ Capital in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .


10

Table of Contents

STRATEGY

Our primary business objective is to continue to increase our cash distributions per unit over time. To accomplish this objective, we intend to execute the following strategy:

Capitalizing on organic growth opportunities. We expect to grow certain of our systems organically over time by meeting Anadarko’s and our other customers’ midstream service needs that result from their drilling activity in our areas of operation. We continually evaluate economically attractive organic expansion opportunities in existing or new areas of operation that allow us to leverage our infrastructure, operating expertise and customer relationships to meet new or increased demand of our services.

Increasing third-party volumes to our systems. We continue to actively market our midstream services to, and pursue strategic relationships with, third-party producers and customers with the intention of attracting additional volumes and/or expansion opportunities.

Pursuing accretive acquisitions. We expect to continue to pursue accretive acquisitions of midstream assets from Anadarko and third parties.

Maintaining investment grade metrics. We intend to operate at appropriate leverage and distribution coverage levels in line with other partnerships in our sector that maintain investment grade credit ratings. By maintaining investment grade credit metrics, in part through staying within leverage ratios appropriate for investment-grade partnerships, we believe that we will be able to pursue strategic acquisitions and large growth projects at a lower cost of fixed-income capital, which would enhance our accretion and overall return.

Managing commodity price exposure. We intend to continue limiting our direct exposure to commodity price changes and promote cash flow stability by pursuing a contract structure designed to mitigate exposure to a majority of the commodity price uncertainty through the use of fee-based contracts and fixed-price hedges.

COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS

We believe that we are well positioned to successfully execute our strategy and achieve our primary business objective because of the following competitive strengths:

Affiliation with Anadarko. We believe Anadarko is motivated to promote and support the successful execution of our business plan and utilize its relationships within the energy industry and the strength of its asset portfolio to pursue projects that help to enhance the value of our business. This includes the ability of Anadarko to secure equity investment opportunities for us in connection with the commitments it makes to other midstream companies. See Our Relationship with Anadarko Petroleum Corporation below.

Commodity price and volumetric risk mitigation. We believe our cash flows are protected from fluctuations caused by commodity price volatility due to (i) the approximately 94% of our Adjusted gross margin attributable to long-term, fee-based agreements and (ii) the commodity price swap agreements that limit our exposure to commodity price changes with respect to a majority of our percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts. For the year ended December 31, 2017 , 96% of our Adjusted gross margin was derived from either long-term, fee-based contracts or from percent-of-proceeds or keep-whole agreements that were hedged with commodity price swap agreements. See How We Evaluate Our Operations under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K. On December 20, 2017 , we renewed our commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko for the DJ Basin complex and the MGR assets through December 31, 2018. See Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A and Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. In addition, we mitigate volumetric risk by entering into contracts with cost of service structures and/or minimum volume commitments. For the year ended December 31, 2017 , and excluding throughput measured in barrels, 62% of our throughput was subject to demand charges and 14% of our throughput was contracted under a cost of service model.

11

Table of Contents

Liquidity to pursue expansion and acquisition opportunities . We believe our operating cash flows, borrowing capacity, long-term relationships and reasonable access to debt and equity capital markets provide us with the liquidity to competitively pursue acquisition and expansion opportunities and to execute our strategy across capital market cycles. As of December 31, 2017 , we had $825.4 million in available borrowing capacity under the RCF.

Substantial presence in basins with historically strong producer economics. Certain of our systems are in areas, such as the Delaware and DJ Basins, and the Eagleford shale, which have historically seen robust producer activity and are considered to have some of the most favorable producer returns for onshore North America. Our assets in these areas serve production where the hydrocarbons contain not only natural gas, but also crude oil, condensate and NGLs.

Well-positioned and well-maintained assets. We believe that our asset portfolio, which is located in geographically diverse areas of operation, provides us with opportunities to expand and attract additional volumes to our systems from multiple productive reservoirs. Moreover, our portfolio consists of high-quality, well-maintained assets for which we have implemented modern processing, treating, measurement and operating technologies.

Consistent track record of accretive acquisitions. Since our IPO in 2008, our management team has successfully executed eleven related-party acquisitions and seven third-party acquisitions, with an aggregate acquisition value of $6.3 billion. Our management team has demonstrated its ability to identify, evaluate, negotiate, consummate and integrate strategic acquisitions and expansion projects, and it intends to use its experience and reputation to continue to grow the Partnership through accretive acquisitions, focusing on opportunities to improve throughput volumes and cash flows.

We believe that we will effectively leverage our competitive strengths to successfully implement our strategy. However, our business involves numerous risks and uncertainties that may prevent us from achieving our primary business objective. For a more complete description of the risks associated with our business, read Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K.


12

Table of Contents

OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION

Our operations and activities are managed by our general partner, which is indirectly controlled by Anadarko through WGP. Anadarko is among the largest independent oil and gas exploration and production companies in the world. Anadarko’s upstream oil and gas business explores for and produces natural gas, crude oil, condensate and NGLs.
We believe that one of our principal strengths is our relationship with Anadarko, and that Anadarko, through its significant indirect economic interest in us, will continue to be motivated to promote and support the successful execution of our business plan and to pursue projects that help to enhance the value of our business.
As of December 31, 2017 , WGP held 50,132,046 of our common units, representing a 29.8% limited partner interest in us, and, through its ownership of our general partner, indirectly held 2,583,068 general partner units, representing a 1.5% general partner interest in us, and 100% of our IDRs. As of December 31, 2017 , other subsidiaries of Anadarko collectively held 2,011,380 common units and 13,243,883 Class C units, representing an aggregate 9.1% limited partner interest in us. As of December 31, 2017 , the public held 100,458,679 common units, representing the remaining 59.6% limited partner interest in us.
For the year ended December 31, 2017 , production owned or controlled by Anadarko represented (i) 34% of our natural gas gathering, treating and transportation throughput (excluding equity investment throughput), (ii) 41% of our natural gas processing throughput (excluding equity investment throughput), and (iii) 56% of our crude oil, NGL and produced water gathering, treating, transportation and disposal throughput (excluding equity investment throughput). In addition, Anadarko supports our operations by providing dedications and/or minimum volume commitments with respect to a substantial portion of its throughput. In executing our growth strategy, which includes acquiring and constructing additional midstream assets, we are able to leverage Anadarko’s significant industry expertise.
We have commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko to mitigate exposure to a majority of the commodity price risk inherent in our percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts at the DJ Basin complex and the MGR assets. These commodity price swap agreements are set to expire in December 2018. See Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
In connection with our IPO, we entered into an omnibus agreement with Anadarko and our general partner that governs our relationship with Anadarko regarding certain reimbursement and indemnification matters. Although we believe our relationship with Anadarko provides us with a significant advantage in the midstream sector, it is also a source of potential conflicts. For example, neither Anadarko nor WGP is restricted from competing with us. Given Anadarko’s significant indirect economic interest in us through its ownership of WGP, we believe it will be in Anadarko’s best economic interest for it to transfer additional assets to us over time. However, Anadarko continually evaluates acquisitions and divestitures and may elect to acquire, construct or dispose of midstream assets in the future without offering us the opportunity to participate in such transactions. Should Anadarko choose to pursue midstream asset sales, it is under no contractual obligation to offer assets or business opportunities to us, nor are we obligated to participate in any such opportunities. We cannot state with any certainty which, if any, opportunities to acquire additional assets from Anadarko may be made available to us or if we will elect, or will have the ability, to pursue any such opportunities. See Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence under Part III, Item 13 of this Form 10-K for more information.


13

Table of Contents

INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

The midstream industry is the link between the exploration for and production of natural gas, NGLs, and crude oil and the delivery of the resulting hydrocarbon components to end-use markets. Operators within this industry create value at various stages along the midstream value chain by gathering production from producers at the wellhead or production facility, separating the produced hydrocarbons into various components and delivering these components to end-use markets, and where applicable, gathering and disposing of produced water.
The following diagram illustrates the primary groups of assets found along the midstream value chain:
WES10KWELLHEADTOMARKET3.JPG

Natural Gas Midstream Services

Midstream companies provide services with respect to natural gas that are generally classified into the categories described below.

Gathering. At the initial stages of the midstream value chain, a network of typically smaller diameter pipelines known as gathering systems directly connect to wellheads or production facilities in the area. These gathering systems transport raw, or untreated, natural gas to a central location for treating and processing, if necessary. A large gathering system may involve thousands of miles of gathering lines connected to thousands of wells. Gathering systems are typically designed to be highly flexible to allow gathering of natural gas at different pressures and scalable to allow gathering of additional production without significant incremental capital expenditures.

Stabilization. Stabilization is a process that separates the heavier hydrocarbons (which are also valuable commodities) that are sometimes found in natural gas, typically referred to as “liquids-rich” natural gas, from the lighter components by using a distillation process or by reducing the pressure and letting the more volatile components flash.

Compression. Natural gas compression is a mechanical process in which a volume of natural gas at a given pressure is compressed to a desired higher pressure, which allows the natural gas to be gathered more efficiently and delivered into a higher pressure system, processing plant or pipeline. Field compression is typically used to allow a gathering system to operate at a lower pressure or provide sufficient discharge pressure to deliver natural gas into a higher pressure system. Since wells produce at progressively lower field pressures as they deplete, field compression is needed to maintain throughput across the gathering system.


14

Table of Contents

Treating and dehydration. To the extent that gathered natural gas contains water vapor or contaminants, such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide, it is dehydrated to remove the saturated water and treated to separate the carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide from the gas stream.

Processing. The principal components of natural gas are methane and ethane, but most natural gas also contains varying amounts of heavier NGLs and contaminants, such as water and carbon dioxide, sulfur compounds, nitrogen or helium. Natural gas is processed to remove unwanted contaminants that would interfere with pipeline transportation or use of the natural gas and to separate those hydrocarbon liquids from the gas that have higher value as NGLs. The removal and separation of individual hydrocarbons through processing is possible due to differences in molecular weight, boiling point, vapor pressure and other physical characteristics.

Fractionation. Fractionation is the process of applying various levels of higher pressure and lower temperature to separate a stream of NGLs into ethane, propane, normal butane, isobutane and natural gasoline for end-use sale.

Storage, transportation and marketing. Once the raw natural gas has been treated or processed and the raw NGL mix has been fractionated into individual NGL components, the natural gas and NGL components are stored, transported and marketed to end-use markets. Each pipeline system typically has storage capacity located throughout the pipeline network or at major market centers to better accommodate seasonal demand and daily supply-demand shifts. We do not currently offer storage services.

Crude Oil Midstream Services

Midstream companies provide services with respect to crude oil that are generally classified into the categories described below.

Gathering. Crude oil gathering assets provide the link between crude oil production gathered at the well site or nearby collection points and crude oil terminals, storage facilities, long-haul crude oil pipelines and refineries. Crude oil gathering assets generally consist of a network of small-diameter pipelines that are connected directly to the well site or central receipt points and deliver into large-diameter trunk lines. To the extent there are not enough volumes to justify construction of or connection to a pipeline system, crude oil can also be trucked from a well site to a central collection point.

Stabilization. Crude oil stabilization assets process crude oil to meet vapor pressure specifications. Crude oil delivery points, including crude oil terminals, storage facilities, long-haul crude oil pipelines and refineries, often have specific requirements for vapor pressure and temperature, and for the amount of sediment and water that can be contained in any crude oil delivered to them.

Produced Water Midstream Services

The services provided by us and other midstream companies with respect to produced water are generally classified into the categories described below.

Gathering. Produced water often accounts for the largest byproduct stream associated with production of crude oil and natural gas. Produced water gathering assets provide the link between well sites or nearby collection points and disposal facilities.

Disposal. As a natural byproduct of crude oil and natural gas production, produced water must be recycled or disposed of in order to maintain production. Produced water disposal systems remove hydrocarbon products and other sediments from the produced water in compliance with applicable regulations and re-inject the produced water utilizing permitted disposal wells.


15

Table of Contents

Typical Contractual Arrangements

Midstream services, other than transportation, are usually provided under contractual arrangements that vary in the amount of commodity price risk they carry. Three typical contract types, or combinations thereof, are described below:

Fee-based. Under fee-based arrangements, the service provider typically receives a fee for each unit of (i) natural gas, NGLs, or crude oil gathered, treated, processed and/or transported, or (ii) produced water disposed of, at its facilities. As a result, the price per unit received by the service provider does not vary with commodity price changes, minimizing the service provider’s direct commodity price risk exposure.

Percent-of-proceeds, percent-of-value or percent-of-liquids. Percent-of-proceeds, percent-of-value or percent-of-liquids arrangements may be used for gathering and processing services. Under these arrangements, the service provider typically remits to the producers either a percentage of the proceeds from the sale of residue gas and/or NGLs or a percentage of the actual residue gas and/or NGLs at the tailgate. These types of arrangements expose the processor to commodity price risk, as the revenues from the contracts directly correlate with the fluctuating price of natural gas and/or NGLs.

Keep-whole. Keep-whole arrangements may be used for processing services. Under these arrangements, the service provider keeps 100% of the NGLs produced, and the processed natural gas, or value of the natural gas, is returned to the producer. Since some of the gas is used and removed during processing, the processor compensates the producer for the amount of gas used and removed in processing by supplying additional gas or by paying an agreed-upon value for the gas used. These arrangements have the highest commodity price exposure for the processor because the costs are dependent on the price of natural gas and the revenues are based on the price of NGLs.

See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding recognition of revenue under our contracts.


16

Table of Contents

PROPERTIES

The following sections describe in more detail the services provided by our assets in our areas of operation as of December 31, 2017 .

GATHERING, PROCESSING AND TREATING

Overview - Rocky Mountains - Colorado and Utah
Location
 
Asset
 
Type
 
Processing / Treating Plants
 
Processing / Treating Capacity (MMcf/d)
 
Processing / Treating Capacity (MBbls/d)
 
Compressors
 
Compression Horsepower
 
Gathering Systems
 
Pipeline Miles
Colorado
 
DJ Basin complex (1)
 
Gathering, Processing & Treating
 
11

 
884

 
14

 
117

 
273,381

 
2

 
3,175

Utah
 
Chipeta (2)
 
Processing
 
3

 
790

 

 
12

 
74,875

 

 
2

Total
 
 
 
 
 
14

 
1,674

 
14

 
129

 
348,256

 
2

 
3,177

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
The DJ Basin complex includes the Platte Valley, Fort Lupton, Fort Lupton JT, Hambert JT, which is currently inactive, and Lancaster Trains I and II processing plants; the Platteville amine treating plant; and the Wattenberg gathering system.
(2)  
We are the managing member of and own a 75% interest in Chipeta. Chipeta owns the Chipeta processing complex and the Natural Buttes refrigeration plant, which is currently inactive.

Rocky Mountains - Colorado
COLORADO2017.JPG

DJ Basin gathering system, treating facility and processing complex

Customers. As of December 31, 2017 , throughput at the DJ Basin complex was from Anadarko and numerous third-party customers. For the year ended December 31, 2017 , Anadarko’s production represented 70% of the DJ Basin complex throughput and the largest third-party customer provided 13% of the throughput.


17

Table of Contents

Supply. There were 2,736 active receipt points connected to the DJ Basin complex as of December 31, 2017 . The DJ Basin complex is primarily supplied by the Wattenberg field, in which Anadarko holds interests in over 400,000 net acres in its core position. Anadarko drilled 348 wells and completed 263 wells during the year ended December 31, 2017 .

Delivery points. As of December 31, 2017 , the DJ Basin complex had the following delivery points for gas not processed within the DJ Basin complex:

Anadarko’s Wattenberg plant inlet; and
Various interconnections with DCP Midstream LP’s (“DCP”) gathering and processing system.

The DJ Basin complex is connected to the Colorado Interstate Gas Company LLC’s pipeline (“CIG pipeline”) and Xcel Energy’s residue pipelines for natural gas residue takeaway and to Overland Pass Pipeline Company LLC’s pipeline and FRP’s pipeline for NGL takeaway. In addition, the NGL fractionator at the Platte Valley plant and associated truck-loading facility provides access to local NGL markets.

Rocky Mountains - Utah
UTAH2017.JPG

Chipeta processing complex

Customers. As of December 31, 2017 , throughput at the Chipeta complex was from Anadarko and numerous third-party customers. For the year ended December 31, 2017 , Anadarko’s production represented 74% of the Chipeta complex throughput and the largest third-party customer provided 15% of the throughput.

Supply. The Chipeta complex is well positioned to access Anadarko and third-party production in the Uinta Basin where Anadarko holds interests in 238,000 gross acres. Chipeta’s inlet is connected to Anadarko’s Natural Buttes gathering system, the Dominion Energy Questar Pipeline, LLC system (“Questar pipeline”) and Three Rivers Gathering, LLC’s system, which is owned by Andeavor Logistics LP (“Andeavor”).


18

Table of Contents

Delivery points. The Chipeta plant delivers NGLs to Enterprise Products Partners LP’s (“Enterprise”) Mid-America Pipeline Company pipeline (“MAPL pipeline”), which provides transportation through Enterprise’s Seminole pipeline (“Seminole pipeline”) and TEP’s pipeline in West Texas and ultimately to the NGL fractionation and storage facilities in Mont Belvieu, Texas. The Chipeta plant has residue gas delivery points through the following pipelines delivering to markets throughout the Rockies and Western United States:

CIG pipeline;
Questar pipeline; and
Wyoming Interstate Company’s pipeline (“WIC pipeline”).

Overview - Rocky Mountains - Wyoming
WYOMING2017.JPG


19


Location
 
Asset
 
Type
 
Processing / Treating Plants
 
Processing / Treating Capacity (MMcf/d)
 
Compressors
 
Compression Horsepower
 
Gathering Systems
 
Pipeline Miles
Northeast Wyoming
 
Bison
 
Treating
 
3

 
450

 
9

 
14,620

 

 

Northeast Wyoming
 
Fort Union (1)
 
Gathering & Treating
 
3

 
295

 
3

 
5,454

 
1

 
315

Northeast Wyoming
 
Hilight
 
Gathering & Processing
 
2

 
60

 
38

 
40,443

 
1

 
1,480

Northeast Wyoming
 
Newcastle (1)
 
Gathering & Processing
 
1

 
3

 
6

 
2,660

 
1

 
189

Southwest Wyoming
 
Granger complex (2)
 
Gathering & Processing
 
4

 
520

 
41

 
43,577

 
1

 
738

Southwest Wyoming
 
Red Desert complex (3)
 
Gathering & Processing
 
1

 
125

 
27

 
51,179

 
1

 
1,113

Southwest Wyoming
 
Rendezvous (4)
 
Gathering
 

 

 
5

 
7,485

 
1

 
338

Total
 
 
 
 
 
14

 
1,453

 
129

 
165,418

 
6

 
4,173

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
We have a 14.81% interest in Fort Union and a 50% interest in Newcastle.
(2)  
The Granger complex includes the “Granger straddle plant,” a refrigeration processing plant.
(3)  
The Red Desert complex includes the Red Desert cryogenic processing plant, which is currently inactive, and the Patrick Draw cryogenic processing plant.
(4)  
We have a 22% interest in the Rendezvous gathering system, which is operated by a third party.

Northeast Wyoming

Bison treating facility

Customers. Throughput at the Bison treating facility was from two third-party customers as of December 31, 2017 . The largest customer provided 83% of the throughput for the year ended December 31, 2017 . In connection with Anadarko’s sale of its Powder River Basin coal-bed methane assets in 2015, Anadarko retained its throughput commitment to Bison through 2020.

Supply and delivery points . The Bison treating facility treats and compresses gas from coal-bed methane wells in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming. The Bison treating facility is directly connected to Fort Union’s pipeline and the Bison pipeline operated by TransCanada Corporation.

Fort Union gathering system and treating facility

Customers. Western Gas Wyoming, L.L.C., Copano Pipelines/Rocky Mountains, LLC , Crestone Powder River LLC and Powder River Midstream, LLC hold a majority of the firm capacity on the Fort Union system. To the extent capacity on the system is not used by these customers, it is available to third parties under interruptible agreements.

Supply. Substantially all of Fort Union’s gas supply is comprised of coal-bed methane volumes that are either produced or gathered by the customers noted above and their affiliates throughout the Powder River Basin. The Fort Union customers noted above gather gas for delivery to Fort Union under contracts with acreage dedications from multiple producers in the heart of the basin and from the coal-bed methane producing area near Sheridan, Wyoming.

Delivery points. The Fort Union system delivers coal-bed methane gas to the hub in Glenrock, Wyoming, which has access to the following interstate pipelines:

CIG pipeline;
Tallgrass Interstate Gas Transmission system’s pipeline (“TIGT pipeline”); and
WIC pipeline.

These pipelines serve gas markets in the Rocky Mountains and Midwest regions of the United States.


20

Table of Contents

Hilight gathering system and processing plant

Customers. As of December 31, 2017 , gas gathered and processed through the Hilight system was from numerous third-party customers . The three largest producers provided 74% of the system throughput for the year ended December 31, 2017 .

Supply. The Hilight gathering system serves the gas gathering needs of several conventional producing fields in Johnson, Campbell, Natrona and Converse Counties, Wyoming.

Delivery points. The Hilight plant delivers residue into our MIGC transmission line (see Transportation within these Items 1 and 2). Hilight is not connected to an active NGL pipeline, resulting in all fractionated NGLs being sold locally through truck and rail loading facilities.

Newcastle gathering system and processing plant

Customers. Gas gathered and processed through the Newcastle system was from numerous third-party customers as of December 31, 2017 . The three largest producers provided 79% of the system throughput, with the largest producer providing 44% of the system throughput, for the year ended December 31, 2017 .

Supply. The Newcastle gathering system and plant primarily service gas production from the Clareton and Finn-Shurley fields in Weston County, Wyoming. Due to infill drilling and enhanced production techniques, producers have continued to maintain production levels.

Delivery points. Propane products from the Newcastle plant are typically sold locally by truck, and the butane/gasoline mix products are transported to the Hilight plant for further fractionation. Residue from the Newcastle system is delivered into Black Hills Corporation’s intrastate pipeline for transport, distribution and sale.

Southwest Wyoming

Granger gathering system and processing complex

Customers. Throughput at the Granger complex was from numerous third-party customers as of December 31, 2017 . For the year ended December 31, 2017 , 78% of the Granger complex throughput was from two third-party customers.

Supply. The Granger complex is supplied by the Moxa Arch and the Jonah and Pinedale Anticline fields. The Granger gas gathering system had 598 active receipt points as of December 31, 2017 .

Delivery points. The residue from the Granger complex can be delivered to the following major pipelines:

CIG pipeline;
Berkshire Hathaway Energy’s Kern River pipeline (“Kern River pipeline”) via a connect with Andeavor’s Rendezvous pipeline (“Rendezvous pipeline”);
Questar pipeline;
Dominion Energy Overthrust Pipeline;
The Williams Companies, Inc.’s Northwest Pipeline (“NWPL”);
our OTTCO pipeline; and
our Mountain Gas Transportation LLC pipeline.

The NGLs have market access to the MAPL pipeline, which terminates at Mont Belvieu, Texas, as well as to local markets.


21

Table of Contents

Red Desert gathering system and processing complex

Customers. As of December 31, 2017 , throughput at the Red Desert complex was from Anadarko and numerous third-party customers. For the year ended December 31, 2017 , 42% of the Red Desert complex throughput was from the two largest third-party customers and 3% was from Anadarko.

Supply. The Red Desert complex gathers, compresses, treats and processes natural gas and fractionates NGLs produced from the eastern portion of the Greater Green River Basin, providing service primarily to the Red Desert and Washakie Basins.

Delivery points. Residue from the Red Desert complex is delivered to the CIG and WIC pipelines, while NGLs are delivered to the MAPL pipeline, as well as to truck and rail loading facilities.

Rendezvous gathering system

Customers . As of December 31, 2017 , throughput on the Rendezvous gathering system was primarily from two shippers that have dedicated acreage to the system.

Supply and delivery points. The Rendezvous gathering system provides high pressure gathering service for gas from the Jonah and Pinedale Anticline fields and delivers to our Granger plant, as well as Andeavor’s Blacks Fork gas processing plant, which connects to the Questar pipeline, NWPL and the Kern River pipeline via the Rendezvous pipeline.

Overview - Texas and New Mexico
Location
 
Asset
 
Type
 
Processing / Treating Plants
 
Processing / Treating Capacity (MMcf/d)
 
Processing / Treating / Disposal Capacity (MBbls/d)
 
Compressors / Pumps (1)
 
Compression Horsepower (1)
 
Gathering Systems
 
Pipeline Miles
West Texas
 
Haley
 
Gathering
 

 

 

 
10

 
15,300

 
1

 
181

West Texas / New Mexico
 
DBM complex (2)
 
Gathering, Processing & Treating
 
6

 
900

 
18

 
102

 
195,835

 
1

 
407

West Texas
 
DBJV system
 
Gathering & Treating
 
9

 
175

 
6

 
71

 
99,820

 
1

 
659

West Texas
 
DBM water systems
 
Gathering & Disposal
 

 

 
90

 
12

 
5,100

 
2

 
36

East Texas
 
Mont Belvieu JV (3)
 
Processing
 
2

 

 
170

 

 

 

 

South Texas
 
Brasada complex
 
Gathering, Processing & Treating
 
3

 
200

 
15

 
14

 
30,450

 
1

 
57

South Texas
 
Springfield system (4)
 
Gathering and Treating
 
3

 

 
75

 
105

 
169,644

 
2

 
815

Total
 
 
 
 
 
23

 
1,275

 
374

 
314

 
516,149

 
8

 
2,155

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Includes owned, rented and leased compressors and compression horsepower.
(2)  
Excludes 1,400 gpm of amine treating capacity at the DBM complex.
(3)  
We own a 25% interest in the Mont Belvieu JV, which owns two NGL fractionation trains. A third party serves as the operator.
(4)  
We own a 50.1% interest in the Springfield system and serve as the operator.


22

Table of Contents

West Texas / New Mexico
WESTTEXAS2017.JPG


23

Table of Contents

Haley gathering system

Customers. As of December 31, 2017 , throughput at the Haley system was from Anadarko and two third-party producers. Anadarko’s production represented 88% of the system throughput for the year ended December 31, 2017 .

Supply. Anadarko holds interests in approximately 590,000 gross (240,000 net) acres in the greater Delaware Basin, a portion of which is gathered by the Haley gathering system.

Delivery points. The Haley gathering system provides both lean and rich gas gathering service. The lean service delivery point is into Enterprise GC, L.P.’s pipeline for ultimate delivery into Energy Transfer Partners, LP’s (“ETP”) Oasis pipeline (the “Oasis pipeline”). The rich service delivery point is into a high pressure gathering line, which is part of our DBJV system.

DBM gathering system, treating facility and processing complex. The DBM complex includes 900 MMcf/d of cryogenic processing capacity, 1,400 gpm of amine treating capacity and a 407 -mile rich gas gathering system, which has both high and low pressure segments. See Assets Under Development within these Items 1 and 2.

Customers. As of December 31, 2017 , gas gathered and processed through the DBM complex was from Anadarko and numerous third-party customers. For the year ended December 31, 2017 , 67% of the throughput was from the six largest third-party customers and 8% was from Anadarko.

Supply. Supply of gas and NGLs for the complex comes from production from the Delaware Sands, Avalon Shale, Bone Spring and Wolfcamp formations in the Delaware Basin portion of the Permian Basin. Anadarko holds interests in approximately 590,000 gross (240,000 net) acres within the Delaware Basin.

Delivery points. Residue gas produced at the facility is delivered to the Ramsey Residue Lines, which extend from the DBM complex to the south and to the north, with both lines connecting with Kinder Morgan, Inc.’s interstate pipeline system (see Transportation within these Items 1 and 2). NGL production is delivered into both the Sand Hills pipeline and Lone Star NGL LLC’s pipeline.

DBJV gathering and treating facility. The DBJV gathering system consists of 659 miles of low pressure and high pressure gas gathering lines.

Customers. Throughput at the DBJV system was from Anadarko and one third-party producer as of December 31, 2017 . Anadarko’s production represented 78% of the system throughput for the year ended December 31, 2017 .

Supply. The system gathers lean Penn gas, as well as liquids-rich Bone Spring, Avalon and Wolfcamp gas.

Delivery points. Avalon, Bone Spring and Wolfcamp gas is dehydrated, compressed and delivered to the Bone Spring Gas Processing plant (the “Bone Spring plant”), the Mi Vida Gas Processing plant (the “Mi Vida plant”) and the DBM complex for processing, while lean Penn gas is delivered into Enterprise GC, L.P.’s pipeline. Residue gas from the Bone Spring and Mi Vida plants is delivered into the Oasis pipeline or Transwestern Pipeline Company LLC’s pipeline.

DBM produced water disposal systems. The DBM water systems consist of the River Reeves and Silvertip systems.

Customers. As of December 31, 2017 , throughput at the DBM water systems was from Anadarko and one third-party producer. Anadarko’s production represented 93% of the throughput for the year ended December 31, 2017 .

Supply. The systems gather and dispose produced water for Anadarko and a third-party producer.


24

Table of Contents

East Texas
EASTTEXAS2017.JPG

Mont Belvieu JV fractionation trains

Customers. The Mont Belvieu JV does not directly contract with customers, but rather is allocated volumes from Enterprise based on the available capacity of the other trains at Enterprise’s NGL fractionation complex in Mont Belvieu, Texas.

Supply and delivery points. Enterprise receives volumes at its fractionation complex in Mont Belvieu, Texas via a large number of pipelines that terminate there, including the Seminole pipeline, Skelly-Belvieu Pipeline Company, LLC’s pipeline, TEP and Enterprise’s Panola Pipeline, in which Anadarko has a 15% equity interest. Individual NGLs are delivered to end users either through customer-owned pipelines that are connected to nearby petrochemical plants or via export terminal.


25

Table of Contents

South Texas
SOUTHTEXAS2017.JPG

Brasada gathering system, stabilization and treating facility and processing complex

Customers. Throughput at the Brasada complex was from one third-party customer as of December 31, 2017 . In the first quarter of 2017, Anadarko completed the sale of its Eagleford shale upstream assets to a third party.

Supply. Supply of gas and NGLs comes from throughput gathered by the Springfield system.

Delivery points. The facility delivers residue gas into the Eagle Ford Midstream system operated by NET Midstream, LLC. It delivers stabilized condensate into Plains All American Pipeline and NGLs into the South Texas NGL Pipeline System operated by Enterprise.

Springfield gathering system, stabilization facility and storage

Customers. Throughput at the Springfield system was from numerous third-party customers as of December 31, 2017 . In the first quarter of 2017, Anadarko completed the sale of its Eagleford shale upstream assets to a third party.

Supply. Supply of gas and oil comes from third-party production in the Eagleford shale.

Delivery points. The gas gathering system delivers rich gas to our Brasada complex, the Raptor processing plant owned by Targa Resources Corp. and Sanchez Midstream Partners LP, and to processing plants operated by Enterprise, ETP and Kinder Morgan, Inc. The oil gathering system has delivery points to Plains All American Pipeline, Kinder Morgan, Inc.’s Double Eagle Pipeline, Hilcorp Energy Company’s Harvest Pipeline and NuStar Energy L.P.’s Pipeline.


26

Table of Contents

Overview - North-central Pennsylvania
MARCELLUS2017.JPG

Location
 
Asset
 
Type
 
Compressors
 
Compression Horsepower
 
Gathering Systems
 
Pipeline Miles
North-central Pennsylvania
 
Marcellus (1)
 
Gathering
 
5

 
6,900

 
3

 
144

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
We own a 33.75% interest in the Marcellus Interest gathering systems.

Marcellus gathering systems

Customers. As of December 31, 2017 , the Marcellus Interest gathering systems had multiple priority shippers. The largest producer provided 75% of the throughput for the year ended December 31, 2017 . Capacity not used by priority shippers is available to third parties as determined by the operating partner, Alta Resources Development, LLC. In the first quarter of 2017, Anadarko completed the sale of its operated and non-operated upstream assets and operated midstream assets (excluding our interests) in the Marcellus shale to a third party.

Supply and delivery points. The Marcellus Interest gathering systems are well positioned to serve dry gas production from the Marcellus shale. The Marcellus Interest gathering systems have access to Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC’s pipeline.


27

Table of Contents

TRANSPORTATION

Overview
TRANSPORTATION2017.JPG

28


Location
 
Asset
 
Type
 
Compressors /
Pump Stations
 
Operational Horsepower
 
Pipeline Miles
Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma
 
White Cliffs (1) (2)
 
Oil
 
24

 
33,800

 
1,054

Utah
 
GNB NGL (1)
 
NGL
 

 

 
33

Northeast Wyoming
 
MIGC (1)
 
Gas
 
2

 
3,360

 
239

Southwest Wyoming
 
OTTCO
 
Gas
 
1

 
3,174

 
217

Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas
 
FRP (1) (3)
 
NGL
 
6

 
12,000

 
447

Texas, Oklahoma
 
TEG (3)
 
NGL
 
8

 
748

 
137

Texas
 
TEP (1) (3)
 
NGL
 
12

 
27,000

 
593

Texas
 
Ramsey Residue Lines (1)
 
Gas
 

 

 
18

Total
 
 
 
 
 
53

 
80,082

 
2,738

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
White Cliffs, GNB NGL, MIGC, FRP, TEP and the Ramsey Residue Lines (at the DBM complex) are regulated by FERC.
(2)  
We own a 10% interest in the White Cliffs pipeline, which is operated by a third party.
(3)  
We own a 20% interest in TEG and TEP and a 33.33% interest in FRP. All three systems are operated by third parties.

Rocky Mountains - Colorado

White Cliffs pipeline

Customers. The White Cliffs pipeline had multiple committed shippers, including Anadarko, as of December 31, 2017 . In addition, other parties may ship on the White Cliffs pipeline at FERC-based rates. An expansion project was completed in 2017 that increased the pipeline’s capacity from 150 MBbls/d to approximately 180 MBbls/d. The White Cliffs dual pipeline system provides crude oil takeaway capacity from Platteville, Colorado to Cushing, Oklahoma.

Supply. The White Cliffs pipeline is supplied by production from the DJ Basin.

Delivery points. The White Cliffs pipeline delivery point is SemCrude’s storage facility in Cushing, Oklahoma, a major crude oil marketing center, which ultimately delivers to Gulf Coast and mid-continent refineries. At the point of origin, it has a 330,000-barrel storage facility adjacent to a truck-unloading facility.

Rocky Mountains - Utah

GNB NGL pipeline

Customers. Anadarko was the only shipper on the GNB NGL pipeline as of December 31, 2017 .

Supply. The GNB NGL pipeline receives NGLs from Chipeta’s gas processing facility and Andeavor’s Stagecoach/Iron Horse gas processing complex.

Delivery points. The GNB NGL pipeline delivers NGLs to the MAPL pipeline, which provides transportation through the Seminole pipeline and TEP in West Texas, and ultimately to NGL fractionation and storage facilities in Mont Belvieu, Texas.

Rocky Mountains - Northeast Wyoming

MIGC transportation system

Customers. Anadarko was the largest firm shipper on the MIGC system, with 88% of the throughput for the year ended December 31, 2017 . The remaining throughput on the MIGC system was from numerous third-party shippers. MIGC is certificated for 175 MMcf/d of firm transportation capacity.

Supply. MIGC receives gas from various coal-bed methane gathering systems in the Powder River Basin and the Hilight system, as well as from WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. on the north end of the transportation system.

29

Table of Contents

Delivery points. MIGC volumes can be redelivered to the hub in Glenrock, Wyoming, which has access to the following interstate pipelines:

CIG pipeline;
TIGT pipeline; and
WIC pipeline.

Volumes can also be delivered to Cheyenne Light Fuel & Power and several industrial users.

Rocky Mountains - Southwest Wyoming

OTTCO transportation system

Customers. For the year ended December 31, 2017 , 10% of OTTCO’s throughput was from Anadarko. The remaining throughput on the OTTCO transportation system was from two third-party shippers. Revenues on the OTTCO transportation system are generated from contracts that contain minimum volume commitments and volumetric fees paid by shippers under firm and interruptible gas transportation agreements.

Supply and delivery points. Supply points to the OTTCO transportation system include approximately 50 wellheads, the Granger complex and ExxonMobil Corporation’s Shute Creek plant, which are supplied by the eastern portion of the Greater Green River Basin, the Moxa Arch and the Jonah and Pinedale Anticline fields. Primary delivery points include the Red Desert complex, two third-party industrial facilities and an inactive interconnection with the Kern River pipeline.

Texas

TEFR Interests

Front Range Pipeline. FRP provides takeaway capacity from the DJ Basin in Northeast Colorado. FRP has receipt points at gas plants in Weld County, Colorado (including the Lancaster plant, which is within the DJ Basin complex) (see Rocky Mountains—Colorado and Utah within these Items 1 and 2). FRP connects to TEP near Skellytown, Texas. As of December 31, 2017 , FRP had multiple committed shippers, including Anadarko. FRP provides capacity to other shippers at the posted FERC tariff rate.

Texas Express Gathering. TEG consists of two NGL gathering systems that provide plants in North Texas, the Texas panhandle and West Oklahoma with access to NGL takeaway capacity on TEP. TEG had one committed shipper as of December 31, 2017 .

Texas Express Pipeline. TEP delivers to NGL fractionation and storage facilities in Mont Belvieu, Texas. At Skellytown, Texas, TEP is supplied with NGLs from other pipelines including FRP and the MAPL pipeline. As of December 31, 2017 , TEP had multiple committed shippers, including Anadarko. TEP provides capacity to other shippers at the posted FERC tariff rates.

Ramsey Residue Lines. The Ramsey Residue Lines extend from the DBM complex to the south and to the north, with both lines connecting with Kinder Morgan, Inc.’s interstate pipeline system. These lines transport residue gas from the DBM complex to interstate markets and are FERC-regulated pipelines. See DBM gathering system, treating facility and processing complex within these Items 1 and 2.


30

Table of Contents

Assets Under Development

In addition to significant gathering expansion projects at both the DBJV system and DJ Basin complex, we currently have the following significant projects scheduled for completion in 2018 and 2019 in West Texas and Colorado. See Capital expenditures , under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

Mentone processing plant: We are currently constructing two cryogenic processing trains at a new processing plant located in Loving County, Texas. Mentone Trains I and II will each have a capacity of 200 MMcf/d and we expect these trains to be completed during the third and fourth quarters of 2018, respectively. The Mentone processing plant will be part of the DBM complex, and upon completion of Mentone Trains I and II, the DBM complex will have a total processing capacity of 1,300 MMcf/d.

Latham processing plant: We have sanctioned two cryogenic processing trains at a new processing plant located in Weld County, Colorado. Construction of Latham Trains I and II (each with a capacity of 200 MMcf/d) is expected to begin by the third quarter of 2018 and we expect these trains to be completed during the first and third quarters of 2019, respectively. The Latham processing plant will be part of the DJ Basin complex, and upon completion of Latham Trains I and II, the DJ Basin complex will have a total processing capacity of 1,250 MMcf/d.

COMPETITION

The midstream services business is extremely competitive. Our competitors include other midstream companies, producers, and intrastate and interstate pipelines. Competition is primarily based on reputation, commercial terms, reliability, service levels, location, available capacity, capital expenditures and fuel efficiencies. However, Anadarko supports our operations by providing dedications and/or minimum volume commitments with respect to a substantial portion of its throughput. We believe that our assets located outside of the dedicated areas are geographically well positioned to retain and attract third-party volumes due to our competitive rates.
We believe the primary advantages of our assets are their proximity to established and/or future production, and the service flexibility they provide to producers. We believe we can efficiently, and at competitive and flexible contract terms, provide services that producers and other customers require to connect, gather and process their natural gas, and gather and dispose of their produced water.


31

Table of Contents

Gathering Systems and Processing Plants

The following table summarizes the primary competitors for our gathering systems and processing plants as of December 31, 2017 .
Asset
 
Competitor(s)
Bison facility
 
Thunder Creek Gas Services, LLC and Fort Union (treating only)
Brasada complex
 
Enterprise, ETP, Targa Resources Partners LP, Kinder Morgan, Inc., Plains All American Pipeline and Howard Energy Partners
Chipeta complex
 
Andeavor and Kinder Morgan, Inc.
DBJV system
 
ETP, Targa Resources Partners LP, Enterprise GC, L.P., EagleClaw Midstream Ventures, LLC, Enlink Midstream Partners, LP and Vaquero Midstream LLC
DBM complex
 
ETP, Targa Resources Partners LP, Enterprise GC, L.P., EagleClaw Midstream Ventures, LLC, Enlink Midstream Partners, LP, Vaquero Midstream LLC, MPLX LP, Crestwood Midstream Partners LP and Noble Midstream Partners LP
DBM water systems
 
NGL Water Solutions, LLC, Mesquite SWD, Inc. and Oilfield Water Logistics, LLC
DJ Basin complex
 
DCP, AKA Energy Group, LLC and Discovery Midstream Partners
Fort Union system
 
Bison treating facility (carbon dioxide treating services only), MIGC, Thunder Creek Gas Services, LLC and TransCanada Corporation
Granger complex
 
Williams Field Services Company, LLC, Enterprise/Jonah Gas Gathering Company and Andeavor
Haley system
 
ETP, Targa Resources Partners LP and Enterprise GC, L.P.
Hilight system
 
ONEOK Gas Gathering Company, Thunder Creek Gas Services, LLC, Crestwood-Access, Tallgrass Energy Partners, LP and Evolution Midstream
Marcellus Interest gathering systems
 
ETP and National Fuel Gas Midstream Corporation
Mont Belvieu JV
 
Targa Resources Partners LP, Phillips 66, Lone Star NGL LLC and ONEOK Partners, LP
Newcastle system
 
Tallgrass Energy Partners, LP
Red Desert complex
 
Williams Field Services Company, LLC and Andeavor
Rendezvous system
 
No significant direct competition
Springfield system
 
Enterprise, ETP, Targa Resources Partners LP, Kinder Morgan, Inc., Plains All American Pipeline, Southcross Energy Partners, L.P., Williams Field Services Company, LLC and Howard Energy Partners

Transportation

MIGC competes with other pipelines that service the regional market and transport gas volumes from the Powder River Basin to Glenrock, Wyoming. MIGC competitors seek to attract and connect new gas volumes throughout the Powder River Basin, including certain volumes currently being transported on the MIGC pipeline. Competitive factors include commercial terms, available capacity, fuel efficiencies, the interconnected pipelines and gas quality issues. MIGC’s major competitors are Thunder Creek Gas Services, LLC, TransCanada Corporation’s Bison pipeline and the Fort Union gathering system. The GNB NGL pipeline’s major competitor is Andeavor. The White Cliffs pipeline faces direct competition from the Saddlehorn pipeline, of which Anadarko is a 20% owner, and the Grand Mesa pipeline. The Saddlehorn pipeline transports crude oil from the DJ Basin and the broader Rocky Mountain area to Cushing, Oklahoma. White Cliffs pipeline shippers can also sell crude oil in local markets or ship crude oil via rail services rather than via pipeline to Cushing, Oklahoma. The TEFR Interests compete with the Sand Hills pipeline, West Texas LPG Pipeline LP’s pipeline, Lone Star NGL LLC’s West Texas System, Overland Pass Pipeline Company LLC’s pipeline and the Seminole pipeline. The OTTCO transportation system faces no direct competition. The Ramsey Residue Lines face competition from ETP, Enterprise and Kinder Morgan, Inc.

32

Table of Contents

REGULATION OF OPERATIONS

Safety and Maintenance

Many of the pipelines we use to gather and transport oil, natural gas and NGLs are subject to regulation by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”), an agency under the U.S. Department of Transportation pursuant to the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, as amended (the “NGPSA”), with respect to natural gas and the Hazardous Liquids Pipeline Safety Act of 1979, as amended (the “HLPSA”), with respect to NGLs and oil. The NGPSA and HLPSA govern the design, installation, testing, construction, operation, replacement and management of natural gas, crude oil, NGL and condensate pipeline facilities. Pursuant to these acts, PHMSA has promulgated regulations governing, among other things, pipeline wall thicknesses, design pressures, maximum allowable operating pressures (“MAOP”), pipeline patrols and leak surveys, minimum depth requirements, and emergency procedures, as well as other matters intended to ensure adequate protection for the public and to prevent accidents and failures. Additionally, PHMSA has promulgated regulations requiring pipeline operators to develop and implement integrity management programs for certain gas and hazardous liquid pipelines that, in the event of a pipeline leak or rupture, could affect high consequence areas (“HCAs”), where a release could have the most significant adverse consequences, including high population areas, certain drinking water sources and unusually sensitive ecological areas. Past operation of our pipelines with respect to these NGPSA and HLPSA requirements has not resulted in the incurrence of material costs; however, due to the possibility of new or amended laws and regulations or reinterpretation of PHMSA enforcement practices or other guidance with respect thereto, future compliance with the NGPSA and HLPSA could result in increased costs that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.
The NGPSA and HLPSA were amended by the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty and Job Creation Act of 2011 (the “2011 Pipeline Safety Act”), which increased the penalties for safety violations, established additional safety requirements for newly constructed pipelines and required studies of safety issues that could result in the adoption of new regulatory requirements by PHMSA for existing pipelines. In June 2016, the Protecting Our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2016 (the “2016 Pipeline Safety Act”) extended PHMSA’s statutory mandate through 2019 and, among other things, empowered PHMSA to address imminent hazards by imposing emergency restrictions, prohibitions and safety measures on owners and operators of gas or hazardous liquid pipeline facilities without prior notice or an opportunity for a hearing. PHMSA published an interim final rule in October 2016 to implement the agency’s expanded authority to address unsafe pipeline conditions or practices that pose an imminent hazard to life, property or the environment.
The adoption of new or amended regulations by PHMSA that result in more stringent or costly pipeline integrity management or safety standards could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations. For example, in January 2017, PHMSA issued a final rule that significantly extends and expands the reach of certain PHMSA hazardous liquid pipeline integrity management requirements, such as, for example, periodic assessments, leak detection and repairs, regardless of the pipeline’s proximity to a high consequence area. The final rule also imposes new reporting requirements for certain unregulated pipelines, including all hazardous liquid gathering lines. However, the date of implementation of this final rule by publication in the Federal Register remains uncertain following the January 2017 change in presidential administrations. Additionally, in March 2016, PHMSA announced a proposed rulemaking that would impose new or more stringent requirements for certain gas transportation and gathering lines including, among other things, expanding certain of PHMSA’s current regulatory safety programs for gas pipelines in newly defined “moderate consequence areas” that contain as few as five dwellings within a potential impact area; requiring gas pipelines installed before 1970 and thus excluded from certain pressure testing obligations to be tested to determine their MAOP; and requiring certain onshore and offshore gathering lines in Class I areas to comply with damage prevention, corrosion control, public education, MAOP limits, line markers and emergency planning standards. Additional requirements proposed by this proposed rulemaking would increase PHMSA’s integrity management requirements for gas pipelines and also require consideration of seismicity in evaluating threats to pipelines. PHMSA has not yet finalized the March 2016 proposed rulemaking. New laws or regulations adopted by PHMSA may impose more stringent requirements applicable to integrity management programs and other pipeline safety aspects of our operations, which could cause us to incur increased capital and operating costs and operational delays. In addition, while states are largely preempted by federal law from regulating pipeline safety for interstate lines, most are certified by PHMSA to assume responsibility for enforcing federal intrastate pipeline regulations and inspection of intrastate pipelines. In practice, because states can adopt stricter standards for intrastate pipelines than those imposed by the federal government for interstate lines, states vary considerably in their authority and capacity to address pipeline safety. Historically, our intrastate pipeline safety compliance costs have not had a material adverse effect on our operations; however, there can be no assurance that such costs will not be material in the future.

33

Table of Contents

We are also subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, including the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, as amended, and comparable state statutes, the purposes of which are to protect the health and safety of workers, both generally and within the pipeline industry. Furthermore, we and the entities in which we own an interest are subject to regulations imposed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) that (i) require information to be maintained concerning hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and that such information be provided to employees, state and local government authorities and citizens and (ii) are designed to prevent or minimize the consequences of catastrophic releases of toxic, reactive, flammable or explosive chemicals.
See Risk Factor, “ Federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to pipeline safety that require the use of new or more stringent safety controls or result in more stringent enforcement of applicable legal requirements could subject us to increased capital costs, operational delays and costs of operation ” under Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K for further discussion on pipeline safety standards.

Interstate Natural Gas Pipeline Regulation

Regulation of pipeline transportation services may affect certain aspects of our business and the market for our products and services. The operations of our MIGC pipeline and the Ramsey Residue Lines are subject to regulation by FERC under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 (the “NGA”). Under the NGA, FERC has authority to regulate natural gas companies that provide natural gas pipeline transportation services in interstate commerce. Federal regulation extends to such matters as the following:

rates, services, and terms and conditions of service;

types of services that may be offered to customers;

certification and construction of new facilities;

acquisition, extension, disposition or abandonment of facilities;

maintenance of accounts and records;

internet posting requirements for available capacity, discounts and other matters;

pipeline segmentation to allow multiple simultaneous shipments under the same contract;

capacity release to create a secondary market for transportation services;

relationships between affiliated companies involved in certain aspects of the natural gas business;

initiation and discontinuation of services;

market manipulation in connection with interstate sales, purchases or transportation of natural gas and NGLs; and

participation by interstate pipelines in cash management arrangements.

Natural gas companies are prohibited from charging rates that have been determined not to be just and reasonable by FERC. In addition, FERC prohibits natural gas companies from unduly preferring or unreasonably discriminating against any person with respect to pipeline rates or terms and conditions of service.

34

Table of Contents

The rates and terms and conditions for our interstate pipeline services are set forth in FERC-approved tariffs. Pursuant to FERC’s jurisdiction over rates, existing rates may be challenged by complaint or by action of FERC under Section 5 of the NGA, and proposed rate increases may be challenged by protest. The outcome of any successful complaint or protest against our rates could have an adverse impact on revenues associated with providing transportation service.
For example, one such matter relates to FERC’s policy regarding allowances for income taxes in determining a regulated entity’s cost of service. In July 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued its opinion in United Airlines, Inc., et al. v. FERC , finding that FERC had acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it failed to demonstrate that permitting an interstate petroleum products pipeline organized as a limited partnership to include an income tax allowance in the cost of service underlying its rates in addition to the discounted cash flow return on equity would not result in the pipeline partnership owners double-recovering their income taxes. The court vacated FERC’s order and remanded to FERC to consider mechanisms for demonstrating that there is no double recovery as a result of the income tax allowance. FERC has also initiated a notice of inquiry regarding its policy for recovery of income tax costs, which remains ongoing. There is not likely to be a definitive resolution of these issues for some time, and the ultimate outcomes of these proceedings are not certain and could result in changes going forward to the FERC’s treatment of income tax allowances in the cost of service or to the discounted cash flow return on equity. Depending upon the resolution of these issues, the cost of service rates of our FERC-regulated interstate pipelines could be affected to the extent new rates or changes to its existing rates are proposed, or if any such rates are subject to complaint or challenged by the FERC, which could cause the rates and revenues for our FERC-regulated pipelines to be adversely affected.
Interstate natural gas pipelines regulated by FERC are also required to comply with numerous regulations related to standards of conduct, market transparency, and market manipulation. FERC’s standards of conduct regulate the manner in which interstate natural gas pipelines may interact with their marketing affiliates (unless FERC has granted a waiver of such standards). FERC’s market oversight and transparency regulations require annual reports of purchases or sales of natural gas meeting certain thresholds and criteria and certain public postings of information on scheduled volumes. FERC’s market manipulation regulations make it unlawful for any entity, directly or indirectly in connection with the purchase or sale of natural gas subject to the jurisdiction of FERC, or the purchase or sale of transportation services subject to the jurisdiction of FERC, to engage in fraudulent conduct. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) also holds authority to monitor certain segments of the physical and futures energy commodities market pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act. FERC and CFTC have authority to impose civil penalties for violations of these statutes and regulations potentially in excess of $1.0 million per day per violation. Should we fail to comply with all applicable statutes, rules, regulations and orders administered by FERC and CFTC, we could be subject to substantial penalties and fines.

Interstate Liquids Pipeline Regulation

Regulation of interstate liquids pipeline services may affect certain aspects of our business and the market for our products and services. Our GNB NGL pipeline provides interstate service as a FERC-regulated common carrier under the Interstate Commerce Act, the Energy Policy Act of 1992, and related rules and orders. We also own interests in FRP, TEP, and White Cliffs, each of which provides interstate services as a FERC-regulated common carrier. FERC regulation requires that interstate liquid pipeline rates, including rates for transportation of NGLs, be filed with FERC and that these rates be “just and reasonable” and not unduly discriminatory. Rates of interstate NGL pipelines are currently regulated by FERC primarily through an annual indexing methodology, under which pipelines increase or decrease their rates in accordance with an index adjustment specified by FERC. For the five-year period beginning July 2, 2016, FERC established an annual index adjustment equal to the change in the producer price index for finished goods plus 1.23%. This adjustment is subject to review every five years. Under FERC’s regulations, an NGL pipeline can request a rate increase that exceeds the rate obtained through application of the indexing methodology by using a cost-of-service approach, but only after the pipeline establishes that a substantial divergence exists between the actual costs experienced by the pipeline and the rates resulting from application of the indexing methodology.

35

Table of Contents

The Interstate Commerce Act permits interested persons to challenge proposed new or changed rates and authorizes FERC to suspend the effectiveness of such rates for up to seven months pending an investigation. If, upon completion of an investigation, FERC finds that the new or changed rate is unlawful, it is authorized to require the pipeline to refund revenues collected in excess of the just and reasonable rate during the term of the investigation. The just and reasonable rate used to calculate refunds cannot be lower than the last tariff rate approved as just and reasonable. FERC may also investigate, upon complaint or on its own motion, rates that are already in effect and may order a carrier to change its rates prospectively. Upon an appropriate showing, a shipper may obtain reparations for charges in excess of a just and reasonable rate for a period of up to two years prior to the filing of a complaint. Finally, the outcome of the FERC policy regarding income tax allowance described above would also apply to our pipelines regulated under the Interstate Commerce Act.
As discussed above, the CFTC holds authority to monitor certain segments of the physical and futures energy commodities market. The Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) has authority to monitor petroleum markets in order to prevent market manipulation. The CFTC and FTC have authority to impose civil penalties for violations of these statutes and regulations potentially in excess of $1.0 million per day per violation. Should we fail to comply with all applicable statutes, rules, regulations and orders administered by the CFTC and FTC, we could be subject to substantial penalties and fines.

Natural Gas Gathering Pipeline Regulation

Regulation of gas gathering pipeline services may affect certain aspects of our business and the market for our products and services. Natural gas gathering facilities are exempt from the jurisdiction of FERC. We believe that our gas gathering pipelines meet the traditional tests that FERC has used to determine that a pipeline is not subject to FERC jurisdiction, although FERC has not made any determinations with respect to the jurisdictional status of any of our gas pipelines other than MIGC and the Ramsey Residue Lines. The distinction between FERC-regulated gas transmission services and federally unregulated gathering services, however, has been the subject of substantial litigation, so the classification and regulation of our gathering facilities are subject to change based on future determinations by FERC, the courts or Congress. State regulation of gathering facilities generally includes various safety, environmental and, in some circumstances, nondiscriminatory take requirements and complaint-based rate regulation. FERC makes jurisdictional determinations on a case-by-case basis. Our natural gas gathering operations could be adversely affected should they be subject to more stringent application of state or federal regulation of rates and services. Our natural gas gathering operations also may be or become subject to additional safety and operational regulations relating to the design, installation, testing, construction, operation, replacement and management of gathering facilities. Additional rules and legislation pertaining to these matters are considered or adopted from time to time. We cannot predict what effect, if any, such changes might have on our operations, but the industry could be required to incur additional capital expenditures and increased costs depending on future legislative and regulatory changes.
Our natural gas gathering operations are subject to ratable take and common purchaser statutes in most of the states in which we operate. These statutes generally require our gathering pipelines to take natural gas without undue discrimination as to source of supply or producer. These statutes are designed to prohibit discrimination in favor of one producer over another producer or one source of supply over another source of supply. The regulations under these statutes can have the effect of imposing some restrictions on our ability as an owner of gathering facilities to decide with whom we contract to gather natural gas. The states in which we operate have adopted a complaint-based regulation of natural gas gathering activities, which allows natural gas producers and shippers to file complaints with state regulators in an effort to resolve grievances relating to gathering access and rate discrimination. We cannot predict whether such a complaint will be filed against us in the future. Failure to comply with state regulations can result in the imposition of administrative, civil and criminal remedies. To date, there has been no adverse effect to our systems due to these regulations.
FERC’s anti-manipulation rules apply to non-jurisdictional entities to the extent the activities are conducted “in connection with” gas sales, purchases or transportation subject to FERC jurisdiction. The anti-manipulation rules do not apply to activities that relate only to intrastate or other non-jurisdictional sales or gathering, but only to the extent such transactions do not have a “nexus” to jurisdictional transactions. In addition, FERC’s market oversight and transparency regulations may also apply to otherwise non-jurisdictional entities to the extent annual purchases and sales of natural gas reach a certain threshold. FERC’s civil penalty authority, described above, would apply to violations of these rules.


36

Table of Contents

Intrastate Pipeline Regulation

Regulation of intrastate pipeline services may affect certain aspects of our business and the market for our products and services. Intrastate natural gas and liquids transportation is subject to regulation by state regulatory agencies. The basis for intrastate regulation of natural gas transportation and the degree of regulatory oversight and scrutiny given to intrastate pipeline rates and services varies from state to state. Insofar as such regulation within a particular state will generally affect all intrastate pipeline operators within the state on a comparable basis, we believe that the regulation of intrastate transportation in any states in which we operate will not disproportionately affect our operations.
In the event any of our intrastate pipelines offer natural gas transportation services under Section 311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, such pipelines will be required to meet certain quarterly reporting requirements providing detailed transaction information which could be made public. Such pipelines will also be subject to periodic rate review by FERC. In addition, FERC’s anti-manipulation, market oversight, and market transparency regulations may extend to intrastate natural gas pipelines although they may otherwise be non-jurisdictional, and FERC’s civil penalty authority, described above, would apply to violations of these rules.

Financial Reform Legislation

For a description of financial reform legislation that may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, read Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K for more information.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Our business operations are subject to numerous federal, regional, state, tribal, and local environmental laws and regulations. The more significant of these existing environmental laws and regulations include the following U.S. laws and regulations, as amended from time to time:

the Clean Air Act, which restricts the emission of air pollutants from many sources and imposes various pre-construction, monitoring, and reporting requirements, and which the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) has relied upon as authority for adopting climate change regulatory initiatives relating to greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions;

the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Federal Clean Water Act, which regulates discharges of pollutants from facilities to state and federal waters and establishes the extent to which waterways are subject to federal jurisdiction and rulemakings as protected waters of the United States;

the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, which subjects owners and operators of onshore facilities and pipelines to liability for removal costs and damages arising from an oil spill in waters of the United States;

the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, which imposes liability on generators, transporters, and arrangers of hazardous substances at sites where hazardous substance releases have occurred or are threatening to occur;

the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, which governs the generation, treatment, storage, transport, and disposal of solid wastes, including hazardous wastes;

the Safe Drinking Water Act, which regulates the quality of the nation’s public drinking water through adoption of drinking water standards and control over the injection of waste fluids into below-ground formations that may adversely affect drinking water sources;

the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, which requires facilities to implement a safety hazard communication program and disseminate information to employees, local emergency planning committees, and response departments on toxic chemical uses and inventories;

the Endangered Species Act, which restricts activities that may affect federally identified endangered and threatened species or their habitats through the implementation of operating restrictions or a temporary, seasonal, or permanent ban in affected areas;

37

Table of Contents

the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires federal agencies to evaluate major agency actions having the potential to impact the environment and that may require the preparation of Environmental Assessments and more detailed Environmental Impact Statements that may be made available for public review and comment; and

U.S. Department of Transportation regulations, which relate to advancing the safe transportation of energy and hazardous materials and emergency preparedness.

These laws and their implementing regulations, as well as state counterparts, generally restrict the level of pollutants emitted to ambient air, discharges to surface water, and disposals or other releases to surface and below-ground soils and ground water. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of sanctions, including administrative, civil, and criminal penalties; the imposition of investigatory, remedial, and corrective action obligations or the incurrence of capital expenditures; the occurrence of delays in the permitting, development or expansion of projects; and the issuance of injunctions restricting or prohibiting some or all of our activities in a particular area. See the following risk factors under Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K for further discussion on ozone standards, climate change, including methane or other GHG emissions, hydraulic fracturing and other regulations related to environmental protection: “We are subject to stringent and comprehensive environmental laws and regulations that may expose us to significant costs and liabilities,” “The adoption of climate change or other air emissions legislation or regulations restricting emissions of GHGs or other air pollutants could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the gathering, processing, compressing, treating and transporting services we provide,” and “Changes in laws or regulations regarding hydraulic fracturing could result in increased costs, operating restrictions or delays in the completion of oil and natural gas wells, which could decrease the need for our gathering and processing services.” The ultimate financial impact arising from environmental laws and regulations is neither clearly known nor determinable as existing standards are subject to change and new standards continue to evolve.
Many states where we operate also have, or are developing, similar environmental laws and regulations governing many of these same types of activities. While the legal requirements imposed under state law may be similar in form to federal laws and regulations, in some cases the actual implementation of these requirements may impose additional, or more stringent, conditions or controls that can significantly alter or delay the permitting, development or expansion of a project or substantially increase the cost of doing business. In addition, environmental laws and regulations, including new or amended legal requirements that may arise to address potential environmental concerns including air and water impacts, are expected to continue to have a considerable impact on our operations.
We have incurred and will continue to incur operating and capital expenditures, some of which may be material, to comply with environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations. Historically, our environmental compliance costs have not had a material adverse effect on our results of operations; however, there can be no assurance that such costs will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows in the future, or that new or more stringently applied existing laws and regulations will not materially increase the cost of doing business. Although we are not fully insured against all environmental and occupational health and safety risks, and our insurance does not cover any penalties or fines that may be issued by a governmental authority, we maintain insurance coverage that we believe is sufficient based on our assessment of insurable risks and consistent with insurance coverage held by other similarly situated industry participants. Nevertheless, it is possible that other developments, such as stricter and more comprehensive environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations, as well as claims for damages to property or persons or imposition of penalties resulting from our operations, could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations.
In addition, we dispose of produced water generated from oil and natural gas production operations. The legal requirements related to the disposal of produced water in underground injection wells are subject to change based on concerns of the public or governmental authorities, including concerns relating to recent seismic events near injection wells used for the disposal of produced water. In response to such concerns, regulators in some states have imposed, or are considering imposing, additional requirements in the permitting of produced water disposal wells or are otherwise investigating the existence of a relationship between seismicity and the use of such wells. In addition, ongoing class action lawsuits, to which we are not currently a party, allege that disposal well operations have caused damage to neighboring properties or otherwise violated state and federal rules regulating waste disposal. These developments could result in additional regulation and restrictions on our use of injection wells to dispose of produced water, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, capital expenditures and operating costs, and financial condition.


38

Table of Contents

TITLE TO PROPERTIES AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY

Our real property is classified into two categories: (1) parcels that we own in fee title and (2) parcels in which our interest derives from leases, easements, rights-of-way, permits or licenses from landowners or governmental authorities, permitting the use of such land for our operations. Portions of the land on which our plants and other major facilities are located are owned by us in fee title, and we believe that we have satisfactory title to these lands. The remainder of the land on which our plant sites and major facilities are located is held by us pursuant to surface leases between us, as lessee, and the fee owner of the lands, as lessor. We or affiliates of ours have leased or owned these lands for many years without any material challenge known to us relating to the title to the land upon which the assets are located, and we believe that we have satisfactory leasehold estates or fee ownership of such lands. We have no knowledge of any challenge to the underlying fee title of any material lease, easement, right-of-way, permit or license held by us or to our title to any material lease, easement, right-of-way, permit or lease, and we believe that we have satisfactory title to all of our material leases, easements, rights-of-way, permits and licenses.
Some of the leases, easements, rights-of-way, permits and licenses transferred to us by Anadarko required the consent of the grantor of such rights, which in certain instances was a governmental entity. We believe we have obtained sufficient third-party consents, permits and authorizations for the transfer of the assets necessary to enable us to operate our business in all material respects. With respect to any remaining consents, permits or authorizations that have not been obtained, we have determined these will not have material adverse effect on the operation of our business should we fail to obtain such consents, permits or authorization in a reasonable time frame.
Anadarko may hold record title to portions of certain assets as we make the appropriate filings in the jurisdictions in which such assets are located and obtain any consents and approvals as needed. Such consents and approvals would include those required by federal and state agencies or other political subdivisions. In some cases, Anadarko temporarily holds record title to property as nominee for our benefit and in other cases may, on the basis of the expense and difficulty associated with the conveyance of title, cause its affiliates to retain title, as nominee for our benefit, until a future date. We anticipate that there will be no material change in the tax treatment of our common units resulting from Anadarko holding the title to any part of such assets subject to future conveyance or as our nominee.

EMPLOYEES

The officers of our general partner manage our operations and activities under the direction and supervision of our general partner’s Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2017 , Anadarko employed 438 people who provided direct support to our field operations. All of these employees are deemed jointly employed by Anadarko and our general partner under the services and secondment agreement between our general partner and Anadarko. None of these employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, and Anadarko considers its employee relations to be good. We have separately contracted with Anadarko under the omnibus agreement for general and administrative support for our operations.


39

Table of Contents

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We have made in this Form 10-K, and may from time to time make in other public filings, press releases and statements by management, forward-looking statements concerning our operations, economic performance and financial condition. These forward-looking statements include statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “target,” “goal,” “plans,” “objective,” “should” or similar expressions or variations on such expressions. These statements discuss future expectations, contain projections of results of operations or financial condition or include other “forward-looking” information.
Although we and our general partner believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, neither we nor our general partner can give any assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to, the following:

our ability to pay distributions to our unitholders;

our and Anadarko’s assumptions about the energy market;

future throughput (including Anadarko production) which is gathered or processed by or transported through our assets;

our operating results;

competitive conditions;

technology;

the availability of capital resources to fund acquisitions, capital expenditures and other contractual obligations, and our ability to access those resources from Anadarko or through the debt or equity capital markets;

the supply of, demand for, and price of, oil, natural gas, NGLs and related products or services;

our ability to mitigate exposure to the commodity price risks inherent in our percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts through the extension of our commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko, or otherwise;

weather and natural disasters;

inflation;

the availability of goods and services;

general economic conditions, internationally, domestically or in the jurisdictions in which we are doing business;

federal, state and local laws, including those that limit Anadarko and other producers’ hydraulic fracturing or other oil and natural gas operations;

environmental liabilities;

legislative or regulatory changes, including changes affecting our status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes;


40

Table of Contents

changes in the financial or operational condition of Anadarko;

the creditworthiness of Anadarko or our other counterparties, including financial institutions, operating partners, and other parties;

changes in Anadarko’s capital program, strategy or desired areas of focus;

our commitments to capital projects;

our ability to use the RCF;

our ability to repay debt;

conflicts of interest among us, our general partner, WGP and its general partner, and affiliates, including Anadarko;

our ability to maintain and/or obtain rights to operate our assets on land owned by third parties;

our ability to acquire assets on acceptable terms from Anadarko or third parties, and Anadarko’s ability to generate an inventory of assets suitable for acquisition;

non-payment or non-performance of Anadarko or other significant customers, including under our gathering, processing, transportation and disposal agreements and our $260.0 million note receivable from Anadarko;

the timing, amount and terms of future issuances of equity and debt securities;

the outcome of pending and future regulatory, legislative, or other proceedings or investigations, including the investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board (“NTSB”) related to Anadarko’s operations in Colorado, and continued or additional disruptions in operations that may occur as Anadarko and we comply with regulatory orders or other state or local changes in laws or regulations in Colorado; and

other factors discussed below and elsewhere in this Item 1A, under the caption Critical Accounting Estimates included under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K, and in our other public filings and press releases.

The risk factors and other factors noted throughout this Form 10-K could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Common units are inherently different from capital stock of a corporation, although many of the business risks to which we are subject are similar to those that would be faced by a corporation engaged in similar businesses. We urge you to carefully consider the following risk factors together with all of the other information included in this Form 10-K in evaluating an investment in our common units.
If any of the following risks were to occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of the common units could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.


41

Table of Contents

RISKS INHERENT IN OUR BUSINESS

We are dependent on Anadarko for a substantial portion of the natural gas, crude oil, NGLs and produced water that we gather, treat, process, transport and/or dispose. A material reduction in Anadarko’s production that is gathered, treated, processed or transported by our assets would result in a material decline in our revenues and cash available for distribution.

We rely on Anadarko for a substantial portion of the natural gas, crude oil, NGLs and produced water that we gather, treat, process, transport and/or dispose. For the year ended December 31, 2017 , production owned or controlled by Anadarko represented (i) 34% of our natural gas gathering, treating and transportation throughput (excluding equity investment throughput), (ii) 41% of our natural gas processing throughput (excluding equity investment throughput), and (iii) 56% of our crude oil, NGL and produced water gathering, treating, transportation and disposal throughput (excluding equity investment throughput). Anadarko may decrease its production in the areas serviced by us and is under no contractual obligation to maintain its production volumes dedicated to us pursuant to the terms of our applicable gathering agreements. The loss of a significant portion of production volumes supplied by Anadarko would result in a material decline in our revenues and our cash available for distribution. In addition, Anadarko may determine that drilling activity in areas other than our areas of operation is strategically more attractive. A shift in Anadarko’s focus away from our areas of operation could result in reduced throughput on our systems and a material decline in our revenues and cash available for distribution.

Because we are substantially dependent on Anadarko as our primary customer and the controlling party of our general partner, any development that materially and adversely affects Anadarko’s operations, financial condition or market reputation could have a material and adverse impact on us. Material adverse changes at Anadarko could restrict our access to capital, make it more expensive to access the capital markets or increase the costs of our borrowings.

We are substantially dependent on Anadarko as our primary customer and the controlling party of our general partner and we expect to derive a majority of our revenues from Anadarko for the foreseeable future. As a result, any event, whether in our area of operations or otherwise, that adversely affects Anadarko’s production, financial condition, leverage, market reputation, liquidity, results of operations or cash flows may adversely affect our revenues and cash available for distribution. Accordingly, we are indirectly subject to the business risks of Anadarko, some of which are the following:

the volatility of oil and natural gas prices, which could have a negative effect on the value of Anadarko’s oil and natural gas properties, its drilling programs and its ability to finance its operations;

the availability of capital on favorable terms to fund Anadarko’s exploration and development activities;

a reduction in or reallocation of Anadarko’s capital budget, which could reduce the gathering, transportation and treating volumes available to us as a midstream operator, limit our midstream opportunities for organic growth or limit the inventory of midstream assets we may acquire from Anadarko;

Anadarko’s ability to replace its oil and natural gas reserves;

Anadarko’s operations in foreign countries, which are subject to political, economic and other uncertainties;

Anadarko’s drilling, flowline, pipeline, and operating risks, including potential environmental liabilities;

transportation capacity constraints and interruptions;

adverse effects of governmental and environmental regulation;

shareholder activism with respect to Anadarko’s stock or activities by non-governmental organizations to restrict the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas by Anadarko; and

adverse effects from current or future litigation.


42

Table of Contents

Further, we are subject to the risk of non-payment or non-performance by Anadarko, including with respect to our gathering and transportation agreements, our $260.0 million note receivable from Anadarko and our commodity price swap agreements. We cannot predict the extent to which Anadarko’s business would be impacted if conditions in the energy industry were to deteriorate further, nor can we estimate the impact such conditions would have on Anadarko’s ability to perform under our gathering and transportation agreements, note receivable or commodity price swap agreements. Accordingly, any material non-payment or non-performance by Anadarko could reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.
Also, due to our relationship with Anadarko, our ability to access the capital markets, or the pricing or other terms of any capital markets transactions, may be adversely affected by any impairments to Anadarko’s financial condition or adverse changes in its credit ratings.
Any material limitations on our ability to access capital as a result of such adverse changes at Anadarko could limit our ability to obtain future financing on favorable terms, or at all, or could result in increased financing costs in the future. Similarly, material adverse changes at Anadarko could negatively impact our unit price, limiting our ability to raise capital through equity issuances or debt financing, or could negatively affect our ability to engage in, expand or pursue our business activities, and could also prevent us from engaging in certain transactions that might otherwise be considered beneficial to us.
See Part I, Item 1A in Anadarko’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (which is not, and shall not be deemed to be, incorporated by reference herein), for a full discussion of the risks associated with Anadarko’s business.

Sustained low natural gas, NGL or oil prices could adversely affect our business.

Sustained low natural gas, NGL or oil prices impact natural gas and oil exploration and production activity levels and can result in a decline in the production of hydrocarbons over the medium to long term, resulting in reduced throughput on our systems. Such a decline also potentially affects the ability of our vendors, suppliers and customers to continue operations. As a result, sustained lower natural gas and crude oil prices could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and our ability to pay cash distributions to our unitholders.
In general terms, the prices of natural gas, oil, condensate, NGLs and other hydrocarbon products fluctuate in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. For example, market prices for natural gas have declined substantially from the highs achieved in 2008 and have remained depressed for several years. More recently, uncertain global demand for crude oil and the increased supply resulting from the rapid development of shale plays throughout North America have contributed significantly to a substantial drop in crude oil prices. Rapid development of the North American shale plays has also increased the supply of natural gas contributing to a substantial drop in natural gas prices. Additional factors impacting commodity prices include the following:

domestic and worldwide economic and geopolitical conditions;

weather conditions and seasonal trends;

the ability to develop recently discovered fields or deploy new technologies to existing fields;

the levels of domestic production and consumer demand, as affected by, among other things, concerns over inflation, geopolitical issues and the availability and cost of credit;

the availability of imported, or a market for exported, liquefied natural gas;

the availability of transportation systems with adequate capacity;

the volatility and uncertainty of regional pricing differentials, such as in the Rocky Mountains;

the price and availability of alternative fuels;


43

Table of Contents

the effect of energy conservation measures;

the nature and extent of governmental regulation and taxation; and

the forecasted supply and demand for, and prices of, oil, natural gas, NGLs and other commodities.

We generate distributable cash flow from the above-market component of commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko that are scheduled to expire on December 31, 2018.

As discussed in more detail in Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2017 , we had commodity price swap agreements in place with Anadarko related to our activities at the DJ Basin complex and MGR assets at prices that were significantly higher than those that could have been obtained from third parties on the open market. The above-market component of this swap activity is recorded as a cash contribution from Anadarko in the period in which attributable volumes are settled, with all such contributions included in our calculation of distributable cash flows. During 2017 , for example, we recorded $58.6 million in cash contributions from Anadarko related to these swaps.
On December 20, 2017 , we renewed our commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko for the DJ Basin complex and the MGR assets at significantly higher prices than those that could have been obtained from third parties on the open market. These swap agreements expire on December 31, 2018.
We may be unable to further renew the swaps with Anadarko for the DJ Basin complex and the MGR assets on similar terms or at all. If such agreements are renewed with Anadarko, they may be renewed at lower prices than those established in the agreements currently in place. In the event that we are unable to renew agreements with Anadarko, we may seek to enter into third-party commodity price swap agreements or similar hedging arrangements. Any such market-based hedging arrangement is likely to be significantly less favorable from a commodity pricing perspective and would likely result in a significant decrease in our distributable cash flow.

Because of the natural decline in production from existing wells, our success depends on our ability to obtain new sources of oil and natural gas, which is dependent on certain factors beyond our control. Any decrease in the volumes that we gather, process, treat and transport could adversely affect our business and operating results.

The volumes that support our business are dependent on, among other things, the level of production from natural gas and oil wells connected to our gathering systems and processing and treating facilities. This production will naturally decline over time. As a result, our cash flows associated with these wells will also decline over time. In order to maintain or increase throughput levels on our systems, we must obtain new sources of oil and natural gas. The primary factors affecting our ability to obtain sources of oil and natural gas include (i) the level of successful drilling activity near our systems, (ii) our ability to compete for volumes from successful new wells, to the extent such wells are not dedicated to our systems, and (iii) our ability to capture volumes currently gathered or processed by Anadarko or third parties.
While Anadarko has dedicated production from certain of its properties to us, we have no control over the level of drilling activity in our areas of operation, the amount of reserves associated with wells connected to our systems or the rate at which production from a well declines. In addition, we have no control over Anadarko or other producers or their drilling or production decisions, which are affected by, among other things, the availability and cost of capital, prevailing and projected commodity prices, demand for hydrocarbons, levels of reserves, geological considerations, governmental regulations, the availability of drilling rigs and other production and development costs. Fluctuations in commodity prices can also greatly affect investments by Anadarko and third parties in the development of new oil and natural gas reserves. Declines in oil and natural gas prices have materially reduced exploration, development and production activity in some regions and, if sustained, could lead to a further decrease in such activity. Sustained reductions in exploration or production activity in our areas of operation would lead to reduced utilization of our gathering, processing and treating assets.
Because of these factors, even if new oil and natural gas reserves are known to exist in areas served by our assets, producers (including Anadarko) may choose not to develop those reserves. Moreover, Anadarko may not develop the acreage it has dedicated to us. If competition or reductions in drilling activity result in our inability to maintain the current levels of throughput on our systems, it could reduce our revenue and impair our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.


44

Table of Contents

We may not have sufficient cash from operations following the establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses, including cost reimbursements to our general partner, to enable us to pay distributions at previously announced levels to holders of our common units.

In order to pay the announced fourth quarter 2017 distribution of $0.920 per unit per quarter, or $3.680 per unit per year, we will require available cash of $216.6 million per quarter, or $866.3 million per year, based on the number of common units, general partner units and IDRs outstanding at February 1, 2018 . We may not have sufficient available cash from operating surplus each quarter to enable us to pay distributions at current levels. The amount of cash we can distribute on our units principally depends upon the amount of cash we generate from our operations, which will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on, among other things:

the prices of, level of production of, and demand for oil and natural gas;

the volume of oil and natural gas we gather, compress, process, treat and/or transport;

the volumes and prices of NGLs and condensate that we retain and sell;

demand charges and volumetric fees associated with our transportation services;

the level of competition from other midstream companies;

regulatory action affecting the supply of or demand for oil or natural gas, the rates we can charge, how we contract for services, our existing contracts, our operating costs or our operating flexibility; and

prevailing economic conditions.

In addition, the actual amount of cash we will have available for distribution will depend on other factors, some of which are beyond our control, including the following:

our level of capital expenditures;

our level of operating and maintenance and general and administrative costs;

our debt service requirements and other liabilities;

fluctuations in our working capital needs;

our ability to borrow funds and access capital markets;

our treatment as a flow-through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

restrictions contained in debt agreements to which we are a party; and

the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner.


45

Table of Contents

Our strategies to reduce our exposure to changes in commodity prices may fail to protect us and could negatively impact our financial condition, thereby reducing our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to unitholders.

For the year ended December 31, 2017 , 6% of our Adjusted gross margin was generated under percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole arrangements pursuant to which the associated revenues and expenses are directly correlated with the prices of natural gas, crude oil and NGLs. This percentage may significantly increase as a result of future acquisitions, if any. See How We Evaluate Our Operations under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
We pursue various strategies to seek to reduce our exposure to adverse changes in the prices for natural gas, condensate and NGLs. These strategies will vary in scope based upon the level and volatility of natural gas, condensate and NGL prices and other changing market conditions. We currently have in place commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko expiring in December 2018 to manage a majority of the commodity price risk otherwise inherent in our percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts. To the extent that we engage in price risk management activities such as the commodity price swap agreements, we may be prevented from realizing the full benefits of price increases above the levels set in those agreements. In addition, our commodity price management may expose us to the risk of financial loss in certain circumstances, including if the counterparties to our hedging or other price risk management contracts fail to perform under those arrangements.
On December 20, 2017 , we renewed our commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko for the DJ Basin complex and the MGR assets through December 31, 2018. Upon the expiration of these commodity price swap agreements, we may be unable to renew such agreements with Anadarko on similar terms or at all. If such agreements are renewed with Anadarko, they may be renewed at lower prices than those established in the agreements currently in place. In the event that we are unable to renew agreements with Anadarko, we may seek to enter into third-party commodity price swap agreements or similar hedging arrangements. Any such market-based hedging arrangement is likely to be significantly less favorable from a commodity pricing perspective and would likely expose us to volumetric risk to which we are currently not exposed, because our current commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko are based on our actual volumes.
Additionally, if we are unable to effectively manage the risk associated with our contracts that have commodity price exposure, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

Changes in laws or regulations regarding hydraulic fracturing could result in increased costs, operating restrictions or delays in the completion of oil and natural gas wells, which could decrease the need for our gathering and processing services.

While we do not conduct hydraulic fracturing, our customers do conduct such activities. Hydraulic fracturing is an essential and common practice used by many of our oil and natural gas exploration and production customers to stimulate production of natural gas and oil from dense subsurface rock formations such as shales. Hydraulic fracturing is typically regulated by state oil and natural-gas commissions, but, in recent years, several federal agencies have also asserted regulatory authority over and proposed or promulgated regulations governing certain aspects of the process. For example, in June 2016, the EPA published an effluent limit guideline final rule prohibiting the discharge of wastewater from onshore unconventional oil and gas extraction facilities to publicly owned wastewater treatment plants.
Additionally, in Colorado, where 28% of our throughput for natural gas assets (excluding equity investment throughput) is generated, certain interest groups opposed to oil and natural gas development generally, and hydraulic fracturing in particular, have from time to time pursued ballot initiatives that, if approved, would allow revisions to the state constitution in a manner that would make such exploration and production more difficult or costly in the future.
Furthermore, Congress has from time to time considered the adoption of legislation to provide for federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing. At the state level, a growing number of states have adopted or are considering adopting legal requirements that could impose more stringent disclosure and/or well construction requirements on hydraulic fracturing operations, and states could elect to prohibit high-volume hydraulic fracturing altogether, following the approach taken by the State of New York. In addition, local governments may seek to adopt ordinances within their jurisdictions regulating the time, place and manner of drilling activities in general or hydraulic fracturing activities in particular. Further, in December 2016, the EPA released its final report on the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources, concluding that “water cycle” activities associated with hydraulic fracturing may impact drinking water resources “under some circumstances.”

46

Table of Contents

If new or more stringent federal, state or local legal restrictions or prohibitions relating to the hydraulic fracturing process are adopted in areas where our oil and natural gas exploration and production customers operate, those customers could incur potentially significant added costs to comply with such requirements and experience delays or curtailment in the pursuit of exploration, development or production activities, which could reduce demand for our gathering and processing services. Moreover, increased regulation of the hydraulic fracturing process could also lead to greater opposition to, and litigation over, oil and natural gas production activities using hydraulic fracturing techniques.

Regulations relating to potential induced seismic activity associated with produced water disposal could affect our operations.

We dispose of produced water generated from oil and natural gas production operations. The legal requirements related to the disposal of produced water in underground injection wells are subject to change based on concerns of the public or governmental authorities, including concerns relating to recent seismic events near injection wells used for the disposal of produced water. In response to such concerns, regulators in some states have imposed, or are considering imposing, additional requirements in the permitting of produced water disposal wells or are otherwise investigating the existence of a relationship between seismicity and the use of such wells. For example, Colorado developed and follows guidance when issuing underground injection control permits to limit the maximum injection pressure, rate, and volume of water. Oklahoma has issued rules for wastewater disposal wells that imposed certain permitting and operating restrictions and reporting requirements on disposal wells in proximity to faults, and is also developing and implementing plans directing certain wells where seismic incidents have occurred to restrict or suspend disposal well operations. The Texas Railroad Commission has also adopted similar permitting, operating, and reporting rules for disposal wells. In addition, ongoing class action lawsuits, to which we are not currently a party, allege that disposal well operations have caused damage to neighboring properties or otherwise violated state and federal rules regulating waste disposal. These developments could result in additional regulation and restrictions on our use of injection wells to dispose of produced water, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, capital expenditures and operating costs, and financial condition.

Adverse developments in our geographic areas of operation could disproportionately impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

Our business and operations are concentrated in a limited number of producing areas. Due to our limited geographic diversification, adverse operational developments, regulatory or legislative changes, or other events in an area in which we have significant operations could have a greater impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders than they would if our operations were more diversified.

If Anadarko were to limit transfers of midstream assets to us or if we were to be unable to make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms from Anadarko or third parties, our future growth would be limited. In addition, any acquisitions we make may reduce, rather than increase, our cash generated from operations on a per-unit basis or otherwise fail to meet our expectations.

Our ability to grow depends, in part, on our ability to make acquisitions that increase our cash generated from operations on a per-unit basis. The acquisition component of our strategy is based, in large part, on our expectation of ongoing divestitures of midstream assets by industry participants, including, most notably, Anadarko. A material decrease in such divestitures would limit our opportunities for future acquisitions and could adversely affect our ability to grow our operations and increase our distributions to our unitholders.
If we are unable to make accretive acquisitions from Anadarko or third parties because, among other things, (i) we are unable to identify attractive acquisition candidates or negotiate acceptable purchase contracts, (ii) we are unable to obtain financing for these acquisitions on economically acceptable terms, (iii) we are outbid by competitors, including as a result of increases in our overall cost of capital resulting from our capital structure, or (iv) Anadarko lacks assets suitable for us to acquire, then our future growth and ability to increase distributions will be limited. Furthermore, even if we do make acquisitions that we believe will be accretive, these acquisitions may nevertheless result in a decrease in the cash generated from operations on a per-unit basis.

47

Table of Contents

Any acquisition involves potential risks, including the following, among other things:

mistaken assumptions about volumes or the timing of those volumes, revenues or costs, including synergies;

an inability to successfully integrate the acquired assets or businesses;

the assumption of unknown liabilities;

limitations on rights to indemnity from the seller;

mistaken assumptions about the overall costs of equity or debt;

the diversion of management’s and employees’ attention from other business concerns;

unforeseen difficulties operating in new geographic areas; and

customer or key employee losses at the acquired businesses.

If we consummate any future acquisitions, our capitalization and results of operations may change significantly.

We may not be able to obtain funding on acceptable terms or at all. This may hinder or prevent us from meeting our future capital needs.

Global financial markets and economic conditions have been, and continue to be, volatile, especially for companies involved in the oil and gas industry. The repricing of credit risk and the recent relatively weak economic conditions have made, and will likely continue to make, it difficult for some entities to obtain funding. In addition, as a result of concerns about the stability of financial markets generally and the solvency of counterparties specifically, the cost of obtaining money from the credit markets generally has increased as many lenders and institutional investors have increased interest rates, enacted tighter lending standards, refused to refinance existing debt at maturity at all or on terms similar to the borrower’s current debt, and reduced, or in some cases, ceased to provide funding to borrowers. Further, we may be unable to obtain adequate funding under the RCF if our lending counterparties become unwilling or unable to meet their funding obligations. Due to these factors, we cannot be certain that funding will be available if needed and to the extent required on acceptable terms. If funding is not available when needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to execute our business plans, complete acquisitions or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

Restrictions in the indentures governing our publicly traded notes (collectively, the “Notes”) or the RCF may limit our ability to capitalize on acquisitions and other business opportunities.

The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in the agreements governing the Notes, the RCF and any future financing arrangements could restrict our ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to expand or pursue business activities associated with our subsidiaries and equity investments. The RCF contains, and with respect to the second, fourth and fifth bullets below, the indentures governing the Notes contain, covenants that restrict or limit our ability to do the following:

incur additional indebtedness or guarantee other indebtedness;

grant liens to secure obligations other than our obligations under the Notes or RCF or agree to restrictions on our ability to grant additional liens to secure our obligations under the Notes or RCF;

engage in transactions with affiliates;


48

Table of Contents

make any material change to the nature of our business from the midstream business; or

enter into a merger, consolidate, liquidate, wind up or dissolve.

The RCF also contains various customary covenants, customary events of default and a maximum consolidated leverage ratio as of the end of each quarter (which is defined as the ratio of consolidated indebtedness as of the last day of a fiscal quarter to Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the RCF, for the most recent four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on such day) of 5.0 to 1.0, or a consolidated leverage ratio of 5.5 to 1.0 with respect to quarters ending in the 270-day period immediately following certain acquisitions. See Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K for a further discussion of the terms of the RCF and Notes.

Debt we owe or incur in the future may limit our flexibility to obtain financing and to pursue other business opportunities.

Our indebtedness could have important consequences to us, including the following:

our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes may be impaired or such financing may not be available on favorable terms;

our funds available for operations, future business opportunities and distributions to unitholders will be reduced by that portion of our cash flows required to make interest payments on our debt;

we may be more vulnerable to competitive pressures or a downturn in our business or the economy generally; and

our flexibility in responding to changing business and economic conditions may be limited.

Our ability to service our debt will depend upon, among other things, our future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. If our operating results are not sufficient to service any future indebtedness, we will be forced to take actions such as reducing distributions, reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures, selling assets or seeking additional equity capital. We may not be able to effect any of these actions on satisfactory terms or at all.

Increases in interest rates could adversely impact our unit price, our ability to issue equity or incur debt for acquisitions or other purposes and our ability to make cash distributions at our intended levels.

Interest rates may increase in the future, whether because of inflation, increased yields on U.S. Treasury obligations or otherwise. In such cases, the interest rates on our floating rate debt, including amounts outstanding under the RCF, would increase. If interest rates rise, our future financing costs could increase accordingly. In addition, as is true with other MLPs (the common units of which are often viewed by investors as yield-oriented securities), our unit price is impacted by our level of cash distributions and implied distribution yield. The distribution yield is often used by investors to compare and rank yield-oriented securities for investment decision-making purposes. Therefore, changes in interest rates, either positive or negative, may affect the yield requirements of investors who invest in our units, and a rising interest rate environment could have an adverse impact on our unit price, our ability to issue equity or incur debt for acquisitions or other purposes and our ability to make cash distributions at our intended levels.


49

Table of Contents

Our failure to maintain an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting could adversely affect our ability to accurately report our results.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide a reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in our internal control that results in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Effective internal control is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and deter and detect any material fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent material fraud, our reputation and operating results will be harmed. Our efforts to develop and maintain our internal control and to remediate material weaknesses in our control may not be successful, and we may be unable to maintain adequate control over our financial processes and reporting in the future, including future compliance with the obligations under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Any failure to develop or maintain effective control, or difficulties encountered in their implementation or other effective improvement of our internal control, could harm our operating results. Ineffective internal control could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information.

Our business could be negatively affected by security threats, including cyber threats, and other disruptions.

We face various security threats, including cyber threats to the security of our facilities and infrastructure, attempts to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information or to render data or systems unusable and terrorist acts. Our implementation of various procedures and controls to monitor and mitigate security threats and to increase security for our facilities, infrastructure and information may result in increased costs. Moreover, there can be no assurance that such procedures and controls will be sufficient to prevent security breaches from occurring. Cyber attacks in particular are becoming more sophisticated and include, but are not limited to, malicious software intended to gain unauthorized access to data and systems, electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in critical systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information and corruption of data. For example, the gathering, processing, treating and transportation of natural gas from our gathering systems, processing facilities and pipelines are dependent on communications among our facilities and with third-party systems that may be delivering natural gas into or receiving natural gas and other products from our facilities. Disruption of those communications, whether caused by cyber attacks or otherwise, may disrupt our ability to deliver natural gas and control these assets.
There is no assurance that we will not suffer material losses from cyber attacks in the future, and as such threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate or remediate any cyber vulnerabilities. Any terrorist or cyber attack against, or other disruption of, our assets or computer systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

The amount of cash we have available for distribution to holders of our common units depends primarily on our cash flows rather than on our profitability. As a result, we may be prevented from making distributions, even during periods in which we record net income.

The amount of cash we have available for distribution depends primarily upon our cash flows and not solely on profitability, which will be affected by non-cash items. As a result, we may make cash distributions for periods in which we record losses for financial accounting purposes and may not make cash distributions for periods in which we record net earnings for financial accounting purposes.
The amount of available cash required to pay the distribution announced for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 , on all of our common units, general partner units and IDRs was $216.6 million , or $866.3 million per year. The Class C unit distribution, if paid in cash, would have been $12.2 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 . To the extent we do not have sufficient available cash under our partnership agreement, we may be unable to pay such distributions or similar distributions in the future.


50

Table of Contents

We typically do not obtain independent evaluations of hydrocarbon reserves connected to our systems. Therefore, in the future, throughput on our systems could be less than we anticipate.

We typically do not obtain independent evaluations of hydrocarbon reserves connected to our systems. Accordingly, we do not have independent estimates of total reserves connected to our systems or the anticipated life of such reserves. If the total reserves or estimated life of the reserves connected to our systems are less than we anticipate, or the timeline for the development of reserves is greater than we anticipate, and we are unable to secure additional sources of oil and natural gas, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

Our industry is highly competitive, and increased competitive pressure could adversely affect our business and operating results.

We compete with similar enterprises in our areas of operation. Our competitors may expand or construct midstream systems that would create additional competition for the services we provide to our customers. In addition, our customers, including Anadarko, may develop their own midstream systems in lieu of using ours. Our ability to renew or replace existing contracts with our customers at rates sufficient to maintain current revenues and cash flows could be adversely affected by the activities of our competitors and our customers. All of these competitive pressures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

Our results of operations could be adversely affected by asset impairments.

If commodity prices decrease, we may be required to write down the value of our midstream properties if the estimated future cash flows from these properties fall below their net book value. Because we are an affiliate of Anadarko, the assets we acquire from Anadarko are recorded at Anadarko’s carrying value prior to the transaction. Accordingly, we may be at an increased risk for impairments because the initial book values of a substantial portion of our assets do not have a direct relationship with, and in some cases could be significantly higher than, the amounts we paid to acquire such assets. For example, see the discussion of material impairments at our Hilight system and Red Desert and Granger complexes in Note 7—Property, Plant and Equipment in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Further, at December 31, 2017 , we had $416.2 million of goodwill on our balance sheet. Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price of a business acquired exceeds the fair market value of the tangible and separately measurable intangible net assets. In addition, similar to the carrying value of the assets we acquired from Anadarko, part of our goodwill is an allocated portion of Anadarko’s goodwill, which we recorded as a component of the carrying value of the assets we acquired from Anadarko. As a result, we may be at increased risk for impairments relative to entities who acquire their assets from third parties or construct their own assets, as the carrying value of our goodwill does not reflect, and in some cases is significantly higher than, the difference between the consideration we paid for our acquisitions and the fair value of the net assets on the acquisition date.
Goodwill is not amortized, but instead must be tested at least annually for impairments, and more frequently when circumstances indicate likely impairments, by applying a fair-value-based test. Goodwill is deemed impaired to the extent that its carrying amount exceeds its implied fair value. Various factors could lead to goodwill impairments, such as our inability to maintain throughput on our assets or sustained lower oil and natural gas prices, by reducing the fair value of the associated reporting unit. Prolonged low or further declines in commodity prices and changes to producers’ drilling plans in response to lower prices could result in additional impairments in future periods. Future non-cash asset impairments could negatively affect our results of operations.


51

Table of Contents

If third-party pipelines or other facilities interconnected to our gathering, transportation, treating or processing systems become partially or fully unavailable, or if the volumes we gather or transport do not meet the quality requirements of such pipelines or facilities, our revenues and cash available for distribution could be adversely affected.

Our gathering, transportation, treating and processing systems are connected to other pipelines or facilities, the majority of which are owned by third parties. The continuing operation of such third-party pipelines or facilities is not within our control. If any of these pipelines or facilities becomes unable to transport, treat or process crude oil, natural gas or NGLs, or if the volumes we gather or transport do not meet the quality requirements of such pipelines or facilities, our revenues and cash available for distribution could be adversely affected.

Our interstate natural gas and liquids transportation assets and operations are subject to regulation by FERC, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and our ability to make distributions.

Our interstate natural gas pipelines are subject to regulation by FERC. If we fail to comply with all applicable FERC-administered statutes, rules, regulations and orders, we could be subject to substantial penalties and fines. FERC has civil penalty authority to impose penalties for certain violations potentially in excess of $1.0 million per day for each violation. FERC also has the power to order disgorgement of profits from transactions deemed to violate applicable statutes. For additional information, read Regulation of Operations–Interstate Natural Gas Pipeline Regulation under Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K.
Our interstate liquids pipelines are common carriers and are also subject to regulation by FERC. FERC regulation requires that common carrier liquid pipeline rates and interstate natural gas pipeline rates be filed with FERC and that these rates be “just and reasonable” and not unduly discriminatory. Interested persons may challenge proposed new or changed rates, and FERC is authorized to suspend the effectiveness of such rates pending an investigation or hearing. FERC may also investigate, upon complaint or on its own motion, rates that are already in effect and may order a carrier to change its rates prospectively. Accordingly, action by FERC could adversely affect our ability to establish reasonable rates that cover operating costs and allow for a reasonable return. An adverse determination in any future rate proceeding brought by or against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash available for distribution. For example, one such matter relates to FERC’s policy regarding allowances for income taxes in determining a regulated entity’s cost of service. FERC allows regulated companies to recover an allowance for income taxes in rates only to the extent the company or its owners, such as our unitholders, are subject to U.S. income tax. This policy affects whom we allow to own our units, and if we are not successful in limiting ownership of our units to persons or entities subject to U.S. income tax, our FERC-regulated rates and revenues for our FERC-regulated gas and liquids pipelines could be adversely affected. For additional information, read Regulation of Operations–Interstate Liquids Pipeline Regulation under Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K.

A change in the jurisdictional characterization of some of our assets by federal, state or local regulatory agencies or a change in policy by those agencies could result in increased regulation of our assets, which could cause our revenues to decline and operating expenses to increase.

We believe that our gas gathering systems meet the traditional tests FERC has used to determine if a pipeline is a gas gathering pipeline and is, therefore, not subject to FERC jurisdiction. FERC, however, has not made any determinations with respect to the jurisdictional status of any of these gas gathering systems. The distinction between FERC-regulated transmission services and federally unregulated gathering services has been the subject of ongoing litigation and, over time, FERC policy concerning which activities it regulates and which activities are excluded from its regulation has changed. State regulation of gathering facilities generally includes various safety, environmental and, in some circumstances, nondiscriminatory take requirements and complaint-based rate regulation. In recent years, FERC has regulated the gas gathering activities of interstate pipeline transmission companies more lightly, which has resulted in a number of such companies transferring gathering facilities to unregulated affiliates. As a result of these activities, natural gas gathering may begin to receive greater regulatory scrutiny at both the state and federal levels.
FERC makes jurisdictional determinations for both natural gas gathering and liquids lines on a case-by-case basis. The classification and regulation of our pipelines are subject to change based on future determinations by FERC, the courts or Congress. A change in the jurisdictional characterization of some of our assets by federal, state or local regulatory agencies or a change in policy by those agencies could result in increased regulation of our assets, which could cause our revenues to decline and operating expenses to increase. For additional information, read Regulation of Operations–Natural Gas Gathering Pipeline Regulation under Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K.


52

Table of Contents

The adoption of climate change or other air emissions legislation or regulations restricting emissions of GHGs or other air pollutants could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the gathering, processing, compressing, treating and transporting services we provide.

Changes in climate change or other air emissions laws and regulations, or reinterpretations of enforcement or other guidance with respect thereto, that govern areas where we operate may negatively impact our operations. Examples of such proposed and/or final regulations or other regulatory initiatives are included below.

Ground-Level Ozone Standards. In October 2015, the EPA issued a rule under the Clean Air Act, lowering the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (“NAAQS”) for ground-level ozone from 75 parts per billion to 70 parts per billion. The EPA published a final rule in November 2017 that issued attainment or unclassifiable area designations with respect to ground-level ozone for numerous counties in the United States and is expected to issue non-attainment area designations in the first half of 2018. Reclassification of areas or imposition of more stringent standards may make it more difficult to construct new or modified sources of air pollution in newly designated non-attainment areas. Also, states with counties that are designated as non-attainment are expected to implement more stringent regulations for those non-attainment areas, which could require installation of new emission controls on some of our equipment, resulting in longer permitting timelines, and significantly increase our capital expenditures and operating costs.

Reduction of Methane Emissions by the Oil and Gas Industry. In June 2016, the EPA published a final rule establishing new emissions standards for methane and additional standards for volatile organic compounds from certain new, modified, and reconstructed oil and natural gas production and natural gas processing and transmission facilities. The EPA’s rule is comprised of New Source Performance Standards, known as Subpart OOOOa, which require certain new, modified, or reconstructed facilities in the oil and natural gas sector to reduce these methane gas and volatile organic compound emissions. These Subpart OOOOa standards will expand previously issued New Source Performance Standards to, among other things, hydraulically fractured oil and natural gas well completions, fugitive emissions from well sites and compressors, and equipment leaks at natural gas processing plants and pneumatic pumps. However, in June 2017, the EPA published a proposed rule to stay certain portions of these Subpart OOOOa standards for two years and revisit the entirety of the 2016 standard, but it has not yet published a final rule and, as a result, the June 2016 standards remain in effect but future implementation of the 2016 standards is uncertain at this time. Furthermore, the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) published a final rule in November 2016 that requires a reduction in methane emissions from venting, flaring and leaking on public lands. However, in December 2017, the BLM published a final rule that temporarily suspends or delays certain requirements contained in the 2016 final rule until January 17, 2019. The suspension of the November 2016 final rule is being challenged by several non-governmental organizations and states. Notwithstanding the current uncertainty of the 2016 rule, we have taken measures to enter into a voluntary regime, together with certain other oil and natural gas exploration and production operators, to reduce methane emissions. At the state level, some states where we operate, including Colorado, have issued requirements for the performance of leak detection programs that identify and repair methane leaks at certain oil and natural gas sources. Compliance with these rules or with any future federal or state methane regulations could, among other things, require installation of new emission controls on some of our equipment and significantly increase our capital expenditures and operating costs.


53

Table of Contents

Reduction of GHG Emissions. The U.S. Congress and the EPA, in addition to some state and regional authorities, have in recent years considered legislation or regulations to reduce emissions of GHGs. These efforts have included consideration of cap-and-trade programs, carbon taxes, GHG reporting and tracking programs, and regulations that directly limit GHG emissions from certain sources. In the absence of federal GHG-limiting legislation, the EPA has determined that GHG emissions present a danger to public health and the environment and has adopted regulations that, among other things, restrict emissions of GHGs under existing provisions of the Clean Air Act and may require the installation of “best available control technology” to limit emissions of GHGs from any new or significantly modified facilities that we may seek to construct in the future if they would otherwise emit large volumes of GHGs together with other criteria pollutants. Also, certain of our operations are subject to EPA rules requiring the monitoring and annual reporting of GHG emissions from specified onshore and offshore production sources. In December 2015, the United States joined the international community at the 21 st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris, France and agreed to review its GHG emissions and set GHG emission reduction goals every five years beginning in 2020. Although this agreement does not create any binding obligations, it does include pledges to voluntarily limit or reduce future emissions. In August 2017, the U.S. State Department informed the United Nations of the intent of the United States to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, which would result in an effective exit date of November 2020. Notwithstanding any withdrawal from this agreement, the implementation of substantial limitations on GHG emissions in areas where we conduct operations could adversely affect demand for oil and natural gas.

Derivatives legislation could have an adverse effect on our ability to use derivative instruments to reduce the effect of commodity price, interest rate and other risks associated with our business.

The Dodd-Frank Act, among other things, establishes federal oversight and regulation of the over-the-counter derivatives market and entities, such as us and Anadarko, that participate in that market. The CFTC has finalized certain of its regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act, but others remain to be finalized or implemented. It is not possible at this time to predict when this will be accomplished or what the terms of the final rules will be, so the impact of those rules is uncertain at this time.
The Dodd-Frank Act and any new regulations could significantly increase the cost of derivative contracts, materially alter the terms of derivative contracts, reduce the availability of derivatives to protect against risks we encounter and reduce our ability to monetize or restructure our existing commodity price contracts. If we reduce the use of commodity price contracts as a result of the legislation and regulations, our results of operations may become more volatile and our cash flows may be less predictable, which could adversely affect our ability to plan for and fund capital expenditures and make cash distributions to our unitholders.


54

Table of Contents

We may incur significant costs and liabilities resulting from pipeline integrity programs and related repairs.

Pursuant to authority under federal law, PHMSA has promulgated regulations requiring pipeline operators to develop and implement integrity management programs for certain gas and hazardous liquid pipelines that, in the event of a pipeline leak or rupture, could affect HCAs, which are areas where a release could have the most significant adverse consequences, including high population areas, certain drinking water sources and unusually sensitive ecological areas. These regulations require the operators of covered pipelines to: (i) perform ongoing assessments of pipeline integrity; (ii) identify and characterize applicable threats to pipeline segments that could impact HCAs; (iii) improve data collection, integration and analysis; (iv) repair and remediate the pipeline as necessary; and (v) implement preventive and mitigating actions. In addition, states have adopted regulations similar to existing PHMSA regulations for certain intrastate gas and hazardous liquid pipelines. At this time, we cannot predict the ultimate cost of compliance with these regulations, as the cost will vary significantly depending on the number and extent of any repairs or replacements of pipeline segments found to be necessary as a result of the pipeline integrity testing. The results of these tests could cause us to incur significant and unanticipated capital and operating expenditures for repairs or replacements of pipeline segments deemed necessary to ensure the safe and reliable operation of our pipelines. Moreover, the adoption of any new legislation or regulations that impose more stringent or costly pipeline integrity management standards could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.

Federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to pipeline safety that require the use of new or more stringent safety controls or result in more stringent enforcement of applicable legal requirements could subject us to increased capital costs, operational delays and costs of operation .

In June 2016, PHMSA’s statutory mandate regarding pipeline safety was extended through 2019, and PHMSA was given expanded authority to address unsafe pipeline conditions or practices that pose an imminent hazard to life, property, or the environment. The imposition of new safety requirements or any issuance or reinterpretation of guidance by PHMSA or any state agencies with respect thereto could require us to install new or modified safety controls, pursue additional capital projects or conduct maintenance programs on an accelerated basis, any or all of which could result in our incurring increased operating costs that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position. For example, in January 2017, PHMSA issued a final rule that significantly extends and expands the reach of certain PHMSA integrity management requirements, such as, for example, periodic assessments, leak detection and repairs, regardless of the pipeline’s proximity to a high consequence area. The final rule also imposes new reporting requirements for certain unregulated pipelines, including all hazardous liquid gathering lines. However, the date of implementation of this final rule by publication in the Federal Register remains uncertain given the January 2017 change in presidential administrations. Additionally, in March 2016, PHMSA announced a proposed rulemaking that would impose new or more stringent requirements for certain natural gas lines and gathering lines including, among other things, expanding certain of PHMSA’s current regulatory safety programs for natural gas pipelines in newly defined “moderate consequence areas” that contain as few as five dwellings within a potential impact area; requiring natural gas pipelines installed before 1970 and thus excluded from certain pressure testing obligations to be tested to determine their MAOP; and requiring certain onshore and offshore gathering lines in Class I areas to comply with damage prevention, corrosion control, public education, MAOP limits, line markers and emergency planning standards. Additional requirements proposed by this proposed rulemaking would increase PHMSA’s integrity management requirements and also require consideration of seismicity in evaluating threats to pipelines. PHMSA has not yet finalized the March 2016 proposed rulemaking. Additionally, PHMSA and one or more state regulators, including the RRC, have in recent years expanded the scope of their regulatory inspections to include certain in-plant equipment and pipelines found within NGL fractionation facilities and associated storage facilities, to assess compliance with hazardous liquids pipeline safety requirements. To the extent that PHMSA and/or state regulatory agencies are successful in asserting their jurisdiction in this manner, midstream operators of NGL fractionation facilities and associated storage facilities may be required to make operational changes or modifications at their facilities to meet standards beyond current OSHA and EPA requirements, which changes or modifications may result in additional capital costs, possible operational delays and increased costs of operation that, in some instances, may be significant.


55

Table of Contents

Some portions of our pipeline systems have been in service for several decades, and we have a limited ownership history with respect to certain of our assets. There could be unknown events or conditions or increased maintenance or repair expenses and downtime associated with our pipelines that could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Some portions of the pipeline systems that we operate were in service for many decades prior to our purchase of them. Consequently, there may be historical occurrences or latent issues regarding our pipeline systems that our executive management may be unaware of and that may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. The age and condition of our pipeline systems could also result in increased maintenance or repair expenditures, and any downtime associated with increased maintenance and repair activities could materially reduce our revenue. Any significant increase in maintenance and repair expenditures or loss of revenue due to the age or condition of our pipeline systems could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We are subject to stringent and comprehensive environmental laws and regulations that may expose us to significant costs and liabilities.

Our operations are subject to stringent and comprehensive federal, tribal, state and local environmental laws and regulations governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection. These environmental laws and regulations may impose numerous obligations that are applicable to our operations, including: (i) the acquisition of permits to conduct regulated activities; (ii) restrictions on the types, quantities and concentrations of materials that can be released into the environment; (iii) limitations on the generation, management and disposal of wastes; (iv) limitations or prohibitions of construction and operating activities in environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, urban areas, wilderness regions and other protected areas; (v) requiring capital expenditures to limit or prevent releases of materials from our pipelines and facilities; and (vi) imposition of substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from our operations or existing at our owned or operated facilities. Numerous governmental authorities, such as the EPA and analogous state agencies, have the power to enforce compliance with these laws and regulations and the permits issued under them, oftentimes requiring difficult and costly remedial or corrective actions. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and permits or any newly adopted legal requirements may result in the assessment of sanctions and administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of investigatory, remedial or corrective action obligations, the incurrence of capital expenditures, the occurrence of delays in the permitting, development or expansion of projects, and the issuance of injunctions limiting or preventing some or all of our operations in particular areas.
We may incur significant environmental costs and liabilities in connection with our operations due to our handling of natural gas, crude oil, NGLs and other petroleum products, because of air emissions and discharges related to our operations, and as a result of historical industry operations and waste disposal practices. For example, an accidental release as a result of our operations could subject us to substantial liabilities arising from environmental cleanup and restoration costs, claims made by owners of the properties through which our gathering or transportation systems pass, neighboring landowners, and other third parties for personal injury, natural resource and property damages, and fines or penalties for related violations of environmental laws or regulations. Joint and several strict liabilities may be incurred, without regard to fault, under certain of these environmental laws and regulations. In addition, stricter laws, regulations or enforcement policies could significantly increase our operational or compliance costs as well as the costs of any remedial actions that may become necessary, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. For example, regulatory initiatives targeting the reduction of certain air pollutants, such as ground level ozone or GHGs such as methane, have been proposed and/or adopted by the EPA but are currently subject to various legal impediments. The adoption of these or any other laws, regulations or other legally enforceable mandates could increase our oil and natural gas customers’ operating and compliance costs as well as reduce the rate of production of oil or natural gas by operators with whom we have a business relationship, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.

56

Table of Contents

In addition, the legal requirements related to the disposal of wastewater to non-producing underground formations by means of underground injection wells are subject to change based on concerns of the public or governmental authorities regarding such disposal activities. One such concern relates to recent seismic events near injection wells used for the disposal of produced water resulting from oil and natural gas activities. In response to concerns regarding induced seismicity, regulators in some states have imposed, or are considering imposing, additional requirements in the permitting of produced water disposal wells or otherwise to assess any relationship between seismicity and the use of such wells. For example, Oklahoma has issued rules for wastewater disposal wells that impose certain permitting and operating restrictions and reporting requirements on disposal wells in proximity to faults and also, from time to time, is developing and implementing plans directing operators of wells injecting at certain depths where seismic incidents have occurred to restrict or suspend disposal well operations. The Texas Railroad Commission has adopted similar permitting, operating, and reporting rules for disposal wells. In addition, class action lawsuits to which we are not currently a party, have been pursued and additional litigation may arise in the future, in which plaintiffs have or may allege that disposal well operations have caused damage to neighboring properties or otherwise violated state and federal rules regulating waste disposal. These developments could result in additional regulation and restrictions on our use of injection wells, which could have a material adverse effect on our capital expenditures and operating costs, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our construction of new assets may not result in revenue increases and is subject to regulatory, environmental, political, legal and economic risks, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

One of the ways we intend to grow our business is through the construction of new midstream assets. The construction of additions or modifications to our existing systems and the construction of new midstream assets involve numerous regulatory, environmental, political and legal uncertainties that are beyond our control. These uncertainties could also affect downstream assets, which we do not own or control, but which are critical to certain of our growth projects. Delays in the completion of new downstream assets, or the unavailability of existing downstream assets, due to environmental, regulatory or political considerations, could have an adverse impact on the completion or utilization of our growth projects. In addition, construction activities could be subject to state, county and local ordinances that restrict the time, place or manner in which those activities may be conducted. Construction projects may also require the expenditure of significant amounts of capital, and financing may not be available on economically acceptable terms or at all. If we undertake these projects, they may not be completed on schedule, at the budgeted cost, or at all. In addition, our revenues may not increase immediately upon the expenditure of funds on a particular project. For instance, if we expand a pipeline, the construction may occur over an extended period of time, yet we will not receive any material increases in revenues until the project is completed. Moreover, we could construct facilities to capture anticipated future growth in production in a region in which such growth does not materialize. Since we are not engaged in the exploration for and development of natural gas and oil reserves, we often do not have access to estimates of potential reserves in an area prior to constructing facilities in that area. To the extent we rely on estimates of future production in our decision to construct additions to our systems, such estimates may prove to be inaccurate as a result of the numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of future production. As a result, new facilities may not be able to attract enough throughput to achieve our expected investment return, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the construction of additions to our existing assets may require us to obtain new rights-of-way. We may be unable to obtain such rights-of-way and may, therefore, be unable to connect new natural gas volumes to our systems or capitalize on other attractive expansion opportunities. Additionally, it may become more expensive for us to obtain new rights-of-way or to renew existing rights-of-way. If the cost of renewing existing or obtaining new rights-of-way increases, our cash flows could be adversely affected.


57

Table of Contents

We have partial ownership interests in several joint venture legal entities that we do not operate or control. As a result, among other things, we may be unable to control the amount of cash we receive or retain from the operation of these entities, and we could be required to contribute significant cash to fund our share of their operations, which could adversely affect our ability to distribute cash to our unitholders.

Our inability, or limited ability, to control the operations and/or management of joint venture legal entities in which we have a partial ownership interest may result in our receiving or retaining less cash than we expect. We also may be unable, or limited in our ability, to cause any such entity to effect significant transactions such as large expenditures or contractual commitments, the construction or acquisition of assets, or the borrowing of money.
In addition, for the equity investments in which we have a minority ownership interest, we are unable to control ongoing operational decisions, including the incurrence of capital expenditures or additional indebtedness that we may be required to fund. Further, the other owners of our equity investments may establish reserves for working capital, capital projects, environmental matters and legal proceedings, that would similarly reduce the amount of cash available for distribution. Any of the above could significantly and adversely impact our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.
Further, in connection with the acquisition of our membership interest in Chipeta, we became party to the Chipeta LLC agreement. Among other things, the Chipeta LLC agreement provides that to the extent available, Chipeta will distribute available cash, as defined in the Chipeta LLC agreement, to its members quarterly in accordance with those members’ membership interests. Accordingly, we are required to distribute a portion of Chipeta’s cash balances, which are included in the cash balances in our consolidated balance sheets, to the other Chipeta member.

We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and facilities are located, which could result in disruptions to our operations.

We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and facilities have been constructed, and we are, therefore, subject to the possibility of more onerous terms and/or increased costs to retain necessary land use if we do not have valid rights-of-way or if such rights-of-way lapse or terminate. We obtain the rights to construct and operate our pipelines on land owned by third parties and governmental agencies for a specific period of time. Any loss of rights with respect to our real property, through our inability to renew right-of-way contracts or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

Our business involves many hazards and operational risks, some of which may not be fully covered by insurance. If a significant accident or event occurs for which we are not fully insured, our operations and financial results could be adversely affected.

Our operations are subject to all of the risks and hazards inherent in gathering, processing, compressing, treating and transporting natural gas, crude oil, NGLs and produced water, including the following:

damage to pipelines and plants, related equipment and surrounding properties caused by hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, fires and other natural disasters and acts of terrorism;

inadvertent damage from construction, farm and utility equipment;

leaks or losses of hydrocarbons or produced water as a result of the malfunction of equipment or facilities;

fires and explosions (for example, see Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Financial Results , under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of the incident at the DBM complex); and

other hazards that could also result in personal injury, loss of life, pollution, natural resource damages and/or curtailment or suspension of operations.

58

Table of Contents

These risks could result in substantial losses due to personal injury and/or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment and pollution or other environmental or natural resource damage. These risks may also result in curtailment or suspension of our operations. A natural disaster or other hazard affecting the areas in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our operations. We are not fully insured against all risks that may occur in our business. In addition, although we are insured for environmental pollution resulting from environmental accidents that occur on a sudden and accidental basis, we may not be insured against all environmental accidents that might occur, some of which may result in toxic tort claims. If a significant accident or event occurs for which we are not fully insured, it could adversely affect our operations and financial condition. Furthermore, we may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount we desire at reasonable rates. As a result of market conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain of our insurance policies may substantially increase. In some instances, certain insurance could become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of coverage. Additionally, we may be unable to recover from prior owners of our assets, pursuant to certain indemnification rights, for potential environmental liabilities.

We are exposed to the credit risk of third-party customers, and any material non-payment or non-performance by these parties, including with respect to our gathering, processing, transportation and disposal agreements, could reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.

On some of our systems, we rely on third-party customers for substantially all of our revenues related to those assets. The loss of all or even a portion of the contracted volumes of these customers, as a result of competition, creditworthiness, inability to negotiate extensions, replacements of contracts or otherwise, could reduce our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders. Further, to the extent any of our third-party customers is in financial distress or enters bankruptcy proceedings, the related customer contracts may be renegotiated at lower rates or rejected altogether.

The loss of, or difficulty in attracting and retaining, experienced personnel could reduce our competitiveness and prospects for future success.

The successful execution of our growth strategy and other activities integral to our operations depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain experienced engineering, operating, commercial and other professionals. Competition for such professionals has historically been intense. If we cannot retain our technical personnel or attract additional experienced technical personnel, our ability to compete could be adversely impacted.

We are required to deduct estimated future maintenance capital expenditures from operating surplus, which may result in less cash available for distribution to unitholders than if actual maintenance capital expenditures were deducted.

Our partnership agreement requires us to deduct estimated, rather than actual, maintenance capital expenditures from operating surplus. The amount of estimated maintenance capital expenditures deducted from operating surplus is subject to review and change by the Special Committee of our Board of Directors at least once a year. In years when our estimated maintenance capital expenditures are higher than actual maintenance capital expenditures, the amount of cash available for distribution will be lower than if actual maintenance capital expenditures were deducted from operating surplus. If we underestimate the appropriate level of estimated maintenance capital expenditures, we may have less cash available for distribution in future periods when actual capital expenditures begin to exceed our previous estimates. Over time, if we do not set aside sufficient cash reserves or have sufficient sources of financing available to make the expenditures required to maintain our asset base, we may be unable to pay distributions at the anticipated level and could be required to reduce our distributions.


59

Table of Contents

RISKS INHERENT IN AN INVESTMENT IN US

Anadarko, through its control of WGP, controls our general partner, which has sole responsibility for conducting our business and managing our operations. Anadarko, WGP and our general partner have conflicts of interest with, and may favor Anadarko’s interests to the detriment of, our unitholders.

Anadarko, through its control of WGP, controls our general partner and indirectly has the power to appoint all of the officers and directors of our general partner. Although our general partner has a duty to manage us in a manner that is beneficial to us and our unitholders, the directors and officers of our general partner have a fiduciary duty to manage our general partner in a manner that is beneficial to its owner, WGP, in which Anadarko holds a controlling general partner interest and an 81.6% limited partner interest. Conflicts of interest may arise between Anadarko, WGP and our general partner, on the one hand, and us and our unitholders, on the other hand. In resolving these conflicts of interest, our general partner may favor its own interests and the interests of Anadarko and WGP over our interests and the interests of our unitholders. These conflicts include the following situations, among others:

Neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement requires Anadarko to pursue a business strategy that favors us.

Anadarko is not limited in its ability to compete with us and may offer business opportunities or sell midstream assets to parties other than us.

Our general partner is allowed to take into account the interests of parties other than us, such as Anadarko, in resolving conflicts of interest.

The officers of our general partner devote significant time to the business of Anadarko and are compensated by Anadarko accordingly. For example, all of the equity incentive compensation currently provided to the officers of our general partner is tied to Anadarko’s common stock rather than our or WGP’s common units.

Our partnership agreement limits the liability of, and reduces the default state law fiduciary duties owed by, our general partner, and also restricts the remedies available to our unitholders for actions that, without the limitations, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty under state law.

Except in limited circumstances, our general partner has the power and authority to conduct our business without unitholder approval.

Our general partner determines the amount and timing of asset purchases and sales, borrowings, issuance of additional partnership securities and the creation, reduction or increase of reserves, each of which can affect the amount of cash that is distributed to our unitholders.

Our general partner determines the amount and timing of any capital expenditures and whether a capital expenditure is classified as a maintenance capital expenditure, which reduces operating surplus, or an expansion capital expenditure, which does not reduce operating surplus. This determination can affect the amount of cash that is distributed to our unitholders and to our general partner.

Our general partner determines which costs incurred by it are reimbursable by us.

Our general partner may cause us to borrow funds in order to permit the payment of cash distributions, even if the purpose or effect of the borrowing is to make IDR payments.

Our partnership agreement does not restrict our general partner from causing us to pay it or its affiliates for any services rendered to us or entering into additional contractual arrangements with any of these entities on our behalf.

Our general partner has limited, and intends to continue to limit, its liability regarding our contractual and other obligations.

60

Table of Contents

Our general partner may exercise its right to call and purchase all of the common units not owned by it and its affiliates if they own more than 80% of the common units.

Our general partner controls the enforcement of the obligations that it and its affiliates owe to us.

Our general partner decides whether to retain separate counsel, accountants or others to perform services for us.

Our general partner may elect to cause us to issue Class B units to it in connection with a resetting of the target distribution levels related to the IDRs without the approval of the Special Committee of the Board of Directors or our unitholders. This election may result in lower distributions to our common unitholders in certain situations.

Read Part III, Item 13 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

A reduction in Anadarko’s ownership interest in us may reduce its incentive to support the Partnership.

As discussed in Our Relationship with Anadarko Petroleum Corporation in Part I, Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K, we believe that one of our principal strengths is our relationship with Anadarko, and that Anadarko, through its significant indirect economic interest in us, will continue to be motivated to promote and support the successful execution of our business plan and to pursue projects that help to enhance the value of our business. In 2014, Anadarko began monetizing a portion of its investment in WGP, including the sale of an aggregate of 20,550,000 WGP common units and 9,200,000 tangible equity units, which partially consist of prepaid equity purchase contracts that can be settled in WGP common units. To the extent Anadarko’s net interest in us continues to decline through the sale of its WGP holdings or otherwise, Anadarko may be less incentivized to grow our business by offering us assets or commercial arrangements. For example, a decrease in Anadarko’s net holdings in us could reduce its incentive to renew our commodity price swap agreements on terms as favorable as currently exist or at all. Accordingly, a decrease in Anadarko’s net holdings in us could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position and ability to grow or make cash distributions to our unitholders.

The amount of cash we pay to our general partner under the IDRs increases as we grow our distributions to limited partners. This increased payout to our general partner raises our overall cost of capital which could impact distribution growth.

WGP, through its ownership of our general partner, holds all of our IDRs. While the IDRs provide Anadarko, which indirectly owns an 81.6% limited partner interest in WGP, financial incentive to continue to grow our business over time, 33.2% of our total distributions (excluding distributions paid on Class C units) were paid to our general partner as a result of its ownership of our IDRs during the fourth quarter of 2017 . As this percentage grows over time, our cost of equity capital will increase, and we could become less competitive in pursuit of acquisition candidates. As a result, in the future we may be unable to acquire or construct assets on an accretive basis and further grow our limited partner distributions. We have from time to time discussed, and may discuss in the future, various transactions that would result in a simplification of our capital structure, including the potential modification or elimination of our IDRs. To date, no proposals have been made. Future evaluation of any such transaction, if any, will be based on a variety of factors, including general industry and market conditions. As a result, we can provide no assurance regarding the likelihood, timing or structure of any such transaction. If consummated, a simplification transaction could be dilutive to the holders of our common units and reduce the rate of our future distribution growth.


61

Table of Contents

The duties of our general partner’s officers and directors may conflict with their duties as officers and directors of WGP’s general partner.

Our general partner’s officers and directors have duties to manage our business in a manner that is beneficial to us, our unitholders and the owner of our general partner, WGP, which is in turn controlled by Anadarko. However, more than half of our general partner’s directors and all of its officers are also officers and/or directors of WGP’s general partner, which has duties to manage the business of WGP in a manner beneficial to WGP and WGP’s unitholders, including Anadarko. Consequently, these directors and officers may encounter situations in which their obligations to us on the one hand, and WGP and/or Anadarko, on the other hand, are in conflict. The resolution of these conflicts may not always be in our best interest or that of our unitholders.
In addition, our general partner’s officers, who are also the officers of WGP’s general partner and certain of whom are officers of Anadarko, will have responsibility for overseeing the allocation of their own time and time spent by administrative personnel on our behalf and on behalf of WGP and/or Anadarko. These officers may face conflicts regarding these time allocations.

Neither Anadarko nor WGP is limited in its ability to compete with us or is obligated to offer us the opportunity to acquire additional assets or businesses, which could limit our ability to grow and could adversely affect our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders.

Neither Anadarko nor WGP is prohibited from owning assets or engaging in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. In addition, in the future, Anadarko or WGP may acquire, construct or dispose of additional midstream or other assets and may be presented with new business opportunities, without any obligation to offer us the opportunity to participate in such transactions. Moreover, while Anadarko may offer us the opportunity to buy additional assets from it, it is under no contractual obligation to do so and we are unable to predict whether or when such acquisitions might be completed.
Cost reimbursements due to Anadarko and our general partner for services provided to us or on our behalf are substantial and reduce our cash available for distribution to our unitholders. The amount and timing of such reimbursements are determined by our general partner.

Prior to making distributions on our common units, we reimburse Anadarko, which controls our general partner, and its affiliates for expenses they incur on our behalf as determined by our general partner pursuant to the omnibus agreement. These expenses include all costs incurred by Anadarko and our general partner in managing and operating us, as well as the reimbursement of incremental general and administrative expenses we incur as a result of being a publicly traded partnership. Our partnership agreement provides that Anadarko will determine in good faith the expenses that are allocable to us. Our general partner may, in good faith, significantly increase the amount of reimbursable general and administrative expenses in the future and any decision to do so would reduce the amount of cash otherwise available for distribution to our unitholders.

If you are not an Eligible Holder, you may not receive distributions or allocations of income or loss on your common units and your common units will be subject to redemption.

We have adopted certain requirements regarding those investors who may own our common units. Eligible Holders are U.S. individuals or entities subject to U.S. federal income taxation on the income generated by us or entities not subject to U.S. federal income taxation on the income generated by us, so long as all of the entity’s owners are U.S. individuals or entities subject to such taxation. If you are not an Eligible Holder, our general partner may elect not to make distributions or allocate income or loss on your units and you run the risk of having your units redeemed by us at the lower of your purchase price cost and the then-current market price. The redemption price will be paid in cash or by delivery of a promissory note, as determined by our general partner.


62

Table of Contents

Our general partner’s liability regarding our obligations is limited.

Our general partner has included provisions in its and our contractual arrangements that limit its liability so that the counterparties to such arrangements have recourse only against our assets, and not against our general partner or its assets. Our general partner may therefore cause us to incur indebtedness or other obligations that are nonrecourse to our general partner. Our partnership agreement provides that any action taken by our general partner to limit its liability is not a breach of our general partner’s duties, even if we could have obtained more favorable terms without the limitation on liability. In addition, we are obligated to reimburse or indemnify our general partner to the extent that it incurs obligations on our behalf. Any such reimbursement or indemnification payments would reduce the amount of cash otherwise available for distribution to our unitholders.

Our partnership agreement requires that we distribute all of our available cash, which could limit our ability to grow and make acquisitions.

We expect that we will continue to distribute all of our available cash to our unitholders and will continue to rely primarily upon external financing sources, including commercial bank borrowings and the issuance of debt and equity securities, to fund our acquisitions and expansion capital expenditures. As a result, to the extent we are unable to finance growth externally, our cash distribution policy will significantly impair our ability to grow.
In addition, because we distribute all of our available cash, our growth may not be as fast as that of businesses that reinvest their available cash to expand ongoing operations. To the extent we issue additional units in connection with any acquisitions or expansion capital expenditures, the payment of distributions on those additional units may increase the risk that we will be unable to maintain or increase our per-unit distribution level. There are no limitations in our partnership agreement, the indenture governing the Notes or the RCF on our ability to issue additional units, including units ranking senior to the common units. The incurrence of additional commercial borrowings or other debt to finance our growth strategy would result in increased interest expense, which, in turn, would impact the available cash that we have to distribute to our unitholders.

Our partnership agreement limits our general partner’s fiduciary duties to holders of our common units.

Our partnership agreement contains provisions that modify and reduce the fiduciary standards to which our general partner would otherwise be held by state fiduciary duty law. For example, our partnership agreement permits our general partner to make a number of decisions in its individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our general partner, or otherwise free of fiduciary duties to us and our unitholders. This entitles our general partner to consider only the interests and factors that it desires and relieves it of any duty or obligation to give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting, us, our affiliates or our limited partners. Examples of decisions that our general partner may make in its individual capacity include the following:

how to allocate corporate opportunities among us and its affiliates;

whether to exercise its limited call right;

how to exercise its voting rights with respect to the units it owns;

whether to exercise its registration rights;

whether to elect to reset target distribution levels; and

whether to consent to any merger or consolidation of the Partnership or amendment to the partnership agreement.

By purchasing a common unit, a common unitholder agrees to become bound by the provisions in the partnership agreement, including the provisions discussed above.


63

Table of Contents

Our partnership agreement restricts the remedies available to holders of our common units for actions taken by our general partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.

Our partnership agreement contains provisions that restrict the remedies available to unitholders for actions taken by our general partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary duty under state fiduciary duty law. For example, our partnership agreement:

provides that whenever our general partner makes a determination or takes, or declines to take, any other action in its capacity as our general partner, our general partner is required to make such determination, or take or decline to take such other action, in good faith, and will not be subject to any other or different standard imposed by our partnership agreement, Delaware law, or any other law, rule or regulation, or at equity;

provides that our general partner will not have any liability to us or our unitholders for decisions made in its capacity as a general partner so long as such decisions are made in good faith, meaning that it believed that the decision was in the best interest of the Partnership;

provides that our general partner and its officers and directors will not be liable for monetary damages to us, our limited partners or their assignees resulting from any act or omission unless there has been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction determining that our general partner or its officers and directors, as the case may be, acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct or, in the case of a criminal matter, acted with knowledge that the conduct was criminal; and

provides that our general partner will not be in breach of its obligations under the partnership agreement or its duties to us or our unitholders if a transaction with an affiliate or the resolution of a conflict of interest is any of the following:

(a)
approved by the Special Committee of the Board of Directors, although our general partner is not obligated to seek such approval;
(b)
approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding common units, excluding any common units owned by our general partner and its affiliates;
(c)
on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or
(d)
fair and reasonable to us, taking into account the totality of the relationships among the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to us.

In connection with a situation involving a transaction with an affiliate or a conflict of interest, any determination by our general partner must be made in good faith. If an affiliate transaction or the resolution of a conflict of interest is not approved by our common unitholders or the Special Committee and the Board of Directors determines that the resolution or course of action taken with respect to the affiliate transaction or conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth in subclauses (c) and (d) above, then it will be presumed that, in making its decision, the Board of Directors acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or the Partnership, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such presumption.

Our general partner may elect to cause us to issue Class B and general partner units to it in connection with a resetting of the target distribution levels related to its IDRs, without the approval of the Special Committee of its Board of Directors or the holders of our common units. This could result in lower distributions to holders of our common units.

Our general partner has the right to reset the initial target distribution levels at higher levels based on our distributions at the time of the exercise of the reset election. Following a reset election by our general partner, the minimum quarterly distribution will be adjusted to equal the reset minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels will be reset to correspondingly higher levels based on percentage increases above the reset minimum quarterly distribution.

64

Table of Contents

If our general partner elects to reset the target distribution levels, it will be entitled to receive a number of Class B units and general partner units. The Class B units will be entitled to the same cash distributions per unit as our common units and will be convertible into an equal number of common units. The number of Class B units to be issued to our general partner will be equal to that number of common units which would have entitled their holder to an average aggregate quarterly cash distribution in the prior two quarters equal to the average of the distributions to our general partner on the IDRs in the prior two quarters. Our general partner will be issued the number of general partner units necessary to maintain its interest in us that existed immediately prior to the reset election. We anticipate that our general partner would exercise this reset right in order to facilitate acquisitions or internal growth projects that would not be sufficiently accretive to cash distributions per common unit without such conversion. It is possible, however, that our general partner could exercise this reset election at a time when it is experiencing, or expects to experience, declines in the cash distributions it receives related to its IDRs and may, therefore, desire to be issued Class B units, which are entitled to distributions on the same priority as our common units, rather than retain the right to receive incentive distributions based on the initial target distribution levels. As a result, a reset election may cause our common unitholders to experience a reduction in the amount of cash distributions that our common unitholders would have otherwise received had we not issued new Class B units and general partner units to our general partner in connection with resetting the target distribution levels.

Holders of our common units have limited voting rights and are not entitled to elect our general partner or its directors.

Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, unitholders have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our business and, therefore, limited ability to influence management’s decisions regarding our business. Unitholders have no right on an annual or ongoing basis to elect our general partner or its Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is chosen by Anadarko (through its control of WGP). Furthermore, if the unitholders are dissatisfied with the performance of our general partner, they have little ability to remove our general partner. As a result of these limitations, the price at which the common units trade could be diminished because of the absence or reduction of a takeover premium in the trading price. Our partnership agreement also contains provisions limiting the ability of unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well as other provisions limiting the unitholders’ ability to influence the manner or direction of management.

Even if holders of our common units are dissatisfied, they cannot remove our general partner without its consent.

Unitholders are currently unable to remove our general partner without its consent because our general partner and its affiliates currently own a sufficient percentage of the outstanding units to be able to prevent its removal. The vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of all outstanding units (including general partner units, common units and Class C units (on an as-converted basis)) voting together as a single class is required to remove our general partner. As of February 12, 2018 , WGP owned a 29.8% limited partner interest in us. Other subsidiaries of Anadarko separately owned an aggregate 9.1% limited partner interest in us, consisting of common and Class C units. As such, Anadarko has the ability to prevent the removal of our general partner.

Our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of certain unitholders owning 20% or more of our common units.

Unitholders’ voting rights are restricted by a provision of our partnership agreement providing that any person or group that owns 20% or more of any class of units then outstanding, other than our general partner, its affiliates, their transferees, the purchasers of the Series A Preferred units (but only with respect to the common units such purchasers received upon conversion of the Series A Preferred units), and persons who acquired such units with the prior approval of the Board of Directors, cannot vote on any matter.


65

Table of Contents

Our general partner interest or the control of our general partner may be transferred to a third party without unitholder consent.

Our general partner may transfer all, but not less than all, of its general partner interest to a third party in connection with a merger or consolidation or the transfer of all or substantially all of its assets without the consent of our unitholders. On or after June 30, 2018, such transfer may be effected in whole or in part without the consent of our unitholders. Furthermore, our partnership agreement does not restrict the ability of (i) WGP to transfer all or a portion of its ownership interest in our general partner to a third party, or (ii) Anadarko to transfer all or a portion of its ownership interest in WGP and/or WGP’s general partner to a third party. Additionally, in March 2016, WGP entered into a secured credit facility under which it has pledged, among other things, its entire interest in our general partner. If WGP were to default, the lenders party to this facility could foreclose upon the interest and take control of our general partner. Any new owner of our general partner or WGP’s general partner, as the case may be, would then be in a position to replace the Board of Directors and officers of our general partner with its own designees and thereby exert significant control over the decisions made by the Board of Directors and officers.

We may issue additional units without unitholder approval, which would dilute existing ownership interests.

Our partnership agreement does not limit the number of additional limited partner interests that we may issue at any time without the approval of our unitholders. The issuance by us of additional common units or other equity securities of equal or senior rank will have the following effects:

our existing unitholders’ proportionate ownership interest in us will decrease;

the amount of cash available for distribution on each unit may decrease;

the ratio of taxable income to distributions may increase;

the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit may be diminished; and

the market price of the common units may decline.

WGP or affiliates may sell units in the public or private markets, and such sales could have an adverse impact on the trading price of the common units.

As of February 12, 2018 , WGP held 50,132,046 common units and other subsidiaries of Anadarko held 2,011,380 common units and 13,243,883 Class C units. Additionally, the Class C units are entitled to receive distributions in the form of additional Class C units, which will increase the number of our common and Class C units owned by affiliates over time. The sale of any or all of these units in the public or private markets could have an adverse impact on the price of the common units or on any trading market on which common units are traded.

Our general partner has a limited call right that may require existing unitholders to sell their units at an undesirable time or price.

If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more than 80% of the common units, our general partner will have the right, which it may assign to any of its affiliates or to us, but not the obligation, to acquire all, but not less than all, of the common units held by unaffiliated persons at a price that is not less than their then-current market price. As a result, existing unitholders may be required to sell their common units at an undesirable time or price and may not receive any return on their investment. Existing unitholders may also incur a tax liability upon a sale of their units. As of February 12, 2018 , WGP owned a 29.8% limited partner interest in us, and other subsidiaries of Anadarko held an aggregate 9.1% limited partner interest in us, consisting of common and Class C units.


66

Table of Contents

Unitholders’ liability may not be limited if a court finds that unitholder action constitutes control of our business.

A general partner of a partnership generally has unlimited liability for the obligations of the partnership, except for those contractual obligations of the partnership that are expressly made without recourse to the general partner. Our partnership is organized under Delaware law, and we conduct business in a number of other states. The limitations on the liability of holders of limited partner interests for the obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly established in some of the other states in which we do business. A unitholder could be liable for any and all of our obligations as if that unitholder were a general partner if a court or government agency were to determine that:

we were conducting business in a state but had not complied with that particular state’s partnership statute; or

such unitholder’s right to act with other unitholders to remove or replace our general partner, to approve some amendments to our partnership agreement or to take other actions under our partnership agreement constitute “control” of our business.

Unitholders may have liability to repay distributions that were wrongfully distributed to them.

Under certain circumstances, unitholders may have to repay amounts wrongfully returned or distributed to them. Under Section 17-607 of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, we may not make a distribution to unitholders if the distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the fair value of our assets. Delaware law provides that for a period of three years from the date of an impermissible distribution, limited partners who received the distribution and who knew at the time of the distribution that it violated Delaware law will be liable to the limited partnership for the distribution amount. Substituted limited partners are liable both for the obligations of the assignor to make contributions to the partnership that were known to the substituted limited partner at the time it became a limited partner and for those obligations that were unknown if the liabilities could have been determined from the partnership agreement. Neither liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interest nor liabilities that are non-recourse to the partnership are counted for purposes of determining whether a distribution is permitted.

If we are deemed to be an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, it would adversely affect the price of our common units and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our assets include, among other items, a $260.0 million note receivable from Anadarko. If this note receivable together with a sufficient amount of our other assets are deemed to be “investment securities,” within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”), we would either have to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, obtain exemptive relief from the SEC or modify our organizational structure or contract rights so as to fall outside of the definition of an investment company. Registering as an investment company could, among other things, materially limit our ability to engage in transactions with affiliates, including the purchase and sale of certain securities or other property from or to our affiliates, restrict our ability to borrow funds or engage in other transactions involving leverage and require us to add additional directors who are independent of us or our affiliates. The occurrence of some or all of these events would adversely affect the price of our common units and could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Moreover, treatment of us as an investment company would prevent our qualification as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, in which case we would be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes. As a result, we would pay federal, and possibly state, income taxes on our taxable income at the corporate tax rates, distributions to our unitholders would generally be taxed again as corporate distributions and none of our income, gains, losses or deductions would flow through to our unitholders. If we were to be taxed as a corporation, our cash available for distribution to our unitholders would be substantially reduced. Therefore, treatment of us as an investment company would result in a material reduction in the anticipated cash flows and after-tax return to the unitholders, likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of our common units.


67

Table of Contents

The market price of our common units could be volatile due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control.

The market price of our common units could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, most of which we cannot control, including the following:

changes in investor or analyst estimates of Anadarko’s and our financial performance or our future distribution growth;

the public’s reaction to Anadarko’s or our press releases, announcements and filings with the SEC;

legislative or regulatory changes affecting our status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes;

fluctuations in broader securities market prices and volumes, particularly among securities of midstream companies and securities of publicly traded limited partnerships;

changes in market valuations of similar companies;

departures of key personnel;

commencement of or involvement in litigation;

variations in our quarterly results of operations or those of other midstream companies;

variations in the amount of our quarterly cash distributions;

future issuances and sales of our common units; and

changes in general conditions in the U.S. economy, financial markets or the midstream industry.

In recent years, the capital markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. Future market fluctuations may result in a lower price of our common units.


68

Table of Contents

TAX RISKS TO COMMON UNITHOLDERS

Our taxation as a flow-through entity depends on our status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as well as our not being subject to a material amount of entity-level taxation by individual states. If the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) were to treat us as a corporation for federal income tax purposes or if we were to become subject to material additional amounts of entity-level taxation for state tax purposes, then our cash available for distribution to our unitholders could be substantially reduced.

The anticipated after-tax economic benefit of an investment in our common units depends largely on our being treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Despite the fact that we are organized as a limited partnership under Delaware law, it is possible in certain circumstances for a partnership such as us to be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes unless it satisfies a “qualifying income” requirement and is not treated as an investment company. Based on our current operations, we believe that we satisfy the qualifying income requirement, and we are not treated as an investment company. Failing to meet the qualifying income requirement, being treated as an investment company, a change in our business activities, or a change in current law could cause us to be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes or otherwise subject us to taxation as an entity.
If we were treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, we would pay federal income tax on our taxable income at the corporate tax rate, which is 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, and would likely pay state income tax at varying rates. Distributions to our unitholders would generally be taxed again as corporate distributions, and no income, gains, losses, deductions or credits would flow through to our unitholders. Because a tax would be imposed upon us as a corporation, our cash available for distribution to our unitholders would be substantially reduced. Therefore, treatment of us as a corporation would result in a material reduction in the anticipated cash flows and after-tax return to our unitholders, likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of our common units.
Our partnership agreement provides that if a law is enacted or existing law is modified or interpreted in a manner that subjects us to taxation as a corporation or otherwise subjects us to entity-level taxation for federal, state or local income tax purposes, the minimum quarterly distribution amount and the target distribution amounts may be adjusted to reflect the impact of that law on us. At the state level, several states have been evaluating ways to subject partnerships to entity-level taxation through the imposition of state income or franchise taxes, or other forms of taxation. For example, we are required to pay Texas margin tax on our gross income apportioned to Texas. Imposition of a similar tax on us in other jurisdictions to which we may expand our operations could substantially reduce the cash available for distribution to our unitholders.

The tax treatment of publicly traded partnerships or an investment in our common units could be subject to potential legislative, judicial or administrative changes or differing interpretations, possibly on a retroactive basis.

The present U.S. federal income tax treatment of publicly traded partnerships, including us, or an investment in our common units may be modified by administrative, legislative or judicial changes or differing interpretations at any time. From time to time, members of Congress propose and consider substantive changes to the existing U.S. federal income tax laws that affect publicly traded partnerships. Although there is no current legislative proposal, a prior legislative proposal would have eliminated the qualifying income exception to the treatment of all publicly traded partnerships as corporations, upon which we rely for our treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In addition, on January 24, 2017, final regulations regarding which activities give rise to qualifying income within the meaning of Section 7704 of the Code (the “Final Regulations”) were published in the Federal Register. The Final Regulations are effective as of January 19, 2017, and apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 19, 2017. We do not believe the Final Regulations affect our ability to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
However, any modification to the U.S. federal income tax laws may be applied retroactively and could make it more difficult or impossible to meet the exception for certain publicly traded partnerships to be treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We are unable to predict whether any of these changes or other proposals will ultimately be enacted. Any similar or future legislative changes could negatively impact the value of an investment in our common units. You are urged to consult with your own tax advisor with respect to the status of regulatory and administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on your investment in our common units.



69

Table of Contents

If the IRS were to contest the federal income tax positions we take, it may adversely impact the market for our common units, and the costs of any such contest would reduce cash available for distribution to our unitholders.

We have not requested a ruling from the IRS with respect to the pricing of our related party agreements with Anadarko or our treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The IRS may adopt positions that differ from the positions we take. It may be necessary to resort to administrative or court proceedings to sustain some or all of the positions we take, and a court may not agree with some or all of those positions. Any contest with the IRS may materially and adversely impact the market for our common units and the price at which they trade. Moreover, the costs of any contest with the IRS will result in a reduction in cash available for distribution to our unitholders and thus will be borne indirectly by our unitholders.

If the IRS makes audit adjustments to our income tax returns for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, it (and some states) may assess and collect any taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustments directly from us, in which case our cash available for distribution to our unitholders might be substantially reduced. In addition, our current and former unitholders may be required to indemnify us for any taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustments that were paid on such unitholders’ behalf.

Pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, if the IRS makes audit adjustments to our income tax returns, it (and some states) may assess and collect any taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustments directly from us. To the extent possible under the new rules, our general partner may elect to either pay the taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) directly to the IRS or, if we are eligible, issue a revised information statement to each unitholder and former unitholder with respect to an audited and adjusted return. Although our general partner may elect to have our unitholders and former unitholders take such audit adjustment into account and pay any resulting taxes (including applicable penalties or interest) in accordance with their respective interests in us during the tax year under audit, there can be no assurance that such election will be practical, permissible or effective in all circumstances. As a result, our current unitholders may bear some or all of the tax liability resulting from such audit adjustment, even if such unitholders did not own units in us during the tax year under audit. If, as a result of any such audit adjustment, we are required to make payments of taxes, penalties and interest, our cash available for distribution to our unitholders might be substantially reduced and our current and former unitholders may be required to indemnify us for any taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustments that were paid on such unitholders’ behalf. These rules are not applicable for tax years beginning on or prior to December 31, 2017.

Our unitholders are required to pay taxes on their share of our income even if they do not receive any cash distributions from us.

Our unitholders are required to pay any U.S. federal income taxes and, in some cases, state and local income taxes on their share of our taxable income whether or not they receive cash distributions from us. For example, if we sell assets and use the proceeds to repay existing debt or fund capital expenditures, unitholders may be allocated taxable income and gain resulting from the sale, and our cash available for distribution would not increase. Similarly, taking advantage of opportunities to reduce our existing debt, such as debt exchanges, debt repurchases, or modifications of our existing debt could result in “cancellation of indebtedness income” being allocated to our unitholders as taxable income without any increase in our cash available for distribution. Our unitholders may not receive cash distributions from us equal to their share of our taxable income or even equal to the actual tax liability that results from that income.
    

70

Table of Contents

Tax gain or loss on the disposition of our common units could be more or less than expected.

If a unitholder sells common units, the unitholder will recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized and that unitholder’s tax basis in those common units. Because distributions in excess of a unitholder’s allocable share of our net taxable income result in a decrease in that unitholder’s tax basis in its common units, the amount, if any, of such prior excess distributions with respect to the units sold will, in effect, become taxable income to that unitholder, if that unitholder sells such units at a price greater than that unitholder’s tax basis in those units, even if the price received is less than their original cost. In addition, because the amount realized includes a unitholder’s share of our nonrecourse liabilities, if they sell their units, unitholders may incur a tax liability in excess of the amount of cash they receive from the sale.
A substantial portion of the amount realized from a unitholder’s sale of units, whether or not representing gain, may be taxed as ordinary income to the unitholder due to potential recapture of items, including depreciation recapture. Thus, a unitholder may recognize both ordinary income and capital loss from the sale of units if the amount realized on the sale is less than the unitholder’s adjusted basis in the units. Net capital loss may only offset capital gains and, in the case of individuals, up to $3,000 of ordinary income per year. In the taxable period in which a unitholder sells units, the unitholder may recognize ordinary income from our allocations of income and gain prior to the sale and from recapture items, which generally cannot be offset by any capital loss recognized upon the sale of units.

Tax-exempt entities face unique tax issues from owning common units that may result in adverse tax consequences to them.

Investment in our common units by tax-exempt entities, such as employee benefit plans and individual retirement accounts (or “IRAs”) raises issues unique to them. For example, virtually all of our income allocated to organizations that are exempt from federal income tax, including IRAs and other retirement plans, will be unrelated business taxable income and will be taxable to them. Further, with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, a tax-exempt entity with more than one unrelated trade or business (including by attribution from investment in a partnership such as ours that is engaged in one or more unrelated trades or businesses) is required to compute the unrelated business taxable income of such tax-exempt entity separately with respect to each such trade or business (including for purposes of determining any net operating loss deduction). As a result, for years beginning after December 31, 2017, it may not be possible for tax-exempt entities to utilize losses from an investment in us to offset unrelated business taxable income from another unrelated trade or business and vice versa. Tax-exempt entities should consult a tax advisor before investing in our common units.

Non-U.S. unitholders will be subject to U.S. taxes and withholding with respect to their income and gain from owning our units.

Non-U.S. unitholders are generally taxed and subject to income tax filing requirements by the United States on income effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business (“effectively connected income”). Income allocated to our unitholders and any gain from the sale of our units will generally be considered to be “effectively connected” with a U.S. trade or business. As a result, distributions to a non-U.S. unitholder are subject to withholding at the highest applicable effective tax rate and a non-U.S. unitholder who sells or otherwise disposes of a unit is also subject to U.S. federal income tax on the gain realized from the sale or disposition of that unit.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted on December 22, 2017, and applicable to years beginning after December 31, 2017, imposes a withholding obligation of 10% of the amount realized upon a non-U.S. unitholder’s sale or exchange of an interest in a partnership that is engaged in a U.S. trade or business. However, due to challenges of administering a withholding obligation applicable to open market trading and other complications, the IRS has temporarily suspended the application of this withholding rule to open market transfers of interests in publicly traded partnerships pending promulgation of regulations or other guidance that resolves the challenges. It is not clear if or when such regulations or other guidance will be issued. Non-U.S. unitholders should consult a tax advisor before investing in our common units.


71

Table of Contents

We treat each purchaser of our common units as having the same tax benefits without regard to the common units actually purchased. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could adversely affect the value of our common units.

Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of common units, we have adopted certain methods of allocating depreciation and amortization deductions that may not conform to all aspects of existing Treasury Regulations. A successful IRS challenge to the use of these methods could adversely affect the amount of tax benefits available to our unitholders. It also could affect the timing of these tax benefits or the amount of gain from any sale of common units and could negatively impact the value of our common units or result in audit adjustments to unitholders’ tax returns.

We generally prorate our items of income, gain, loss and deduction between transferors and transferees of our common units each month based upon the ownership of our common units on the first day of each month, instead of on the basis of the date a particular common unit is transferred. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could change the allocation of items of income, gain, loss and deduction among our unitholders.

We generally prorate our items of income, gain, loss and deduction between transferors and transferees of our common units each month based upon the ownership of our common units on the first day of each month (the “Allocation Date”), instead of on the basis of the date a particular common unit is transferred. Similarly, we generally allocate certain deductions for depreciation of capital additions, gain or loss realized on a sale or other disposition of our assets and, in the discretion of the general partner, any other extraordinary item of income, gain, loss or deduction based upon ownership on the Allocation Date. Treasury Regulations allow a similar monthly simplifying convention, but such regulations do not specifically authorize all aspects of our proration method. If the IRS were to challenge our proration method, we may be required to change the allocation of items of income, gain, loss and deduction among our unitholders.

A unitholder whose common units are the subject of a securities loan (e.g., a loan to a “short seller” to cover a short sale of common units) may be considered to have disposed of those common units. If so, the unitholder would no longer be treated for tax purposes as a partner with respect to those common units during the period of the loan and may recognize gain or loss from the disposition.

Because there are no specific rules governing the federal income tax consequences of loaning a partnership interest, a unitholder whose common units are the subject of a securities loan may be considered to have disposed of the loaned units. In that case, the unitholder may no longer be treated for tax purposes as a partner with respect to those common units during the period of the loan and the unitholder may recognize gain or loss from such disposition. Moreover, during the period of the loan, any of our income, gain, loss or deduction with respect to those common units may not be reportable by the unitholder and any cash distributions received by the unitholder as to those common units could be fully taxable as ordinary income. Unitholders desiring to assure their status as partners and avoid the risk of gain recognition from a securities loan are urged to consult a tax advisor to determine whether it is advisable to modify any applicable brokerage account agreements to prohibit their brokers from borrowing their common units.

We have adopted certain valuation methodologies in determining a unitholder’s allocations of income, gain, loss and deduction. The IRS may challenge these methodologies or the resulting allocations, which could adversely affect the value of our common units.

In determining the items of income, gain, loss and deduction allocable to our unitholders, we must routinely determine the fair market value of our assets. Although we may, from time to time, consult with professional appraisers regarding valuation matters, we make many fair market value estimates using a methodology based on the market value of our common units as a means to measure the fair market value of our assets. The IRS may challenge these valuation methods and the resulting allocations of income, gain, loss and deduction.
A successful IRS challenge to these methods or allocations could adversely affect the timing or amount of taxable income or loss allocated to our unitholders. It also could affect the amount of gain from our unitholders’ sale of our common units and could negatively impact the value of the common units or result in audit adjustments to our unitholders’ tax returns without the benefit of additional deductions.


72

Table of Contents

Our unitholders are subject to state and local taxes and return filing requirements in jurisdictions where they do not live as a result of investing in our common units.

In addition to U.S. federal income taxes, our unitholders are subject to other taxes, including foreign, state and local taxes, unincorporated business taxes and estate, inheritance or intangible taxes that are imposed by the various jurisdictions in which we conduct business or own property now or in the future, even if they do not live in any of those jurisdictions. Our unitholders will likely be required to file foreign, state and local income tax returns and pay state and local income taxes in some or all of these various jurisdictions. Further, our unitholders may be subject to penalties for failure to comply with those requirements. As we make acquisitions or expand our business, we may own assets or conduct business in additional states or foreign jurisdictions that impose a personal income tax. It is the responsibility of each unitholder to file all U.S. federal, foreign, state and local tax returns.

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

DBM, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, is currently in negotiations with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) with respect to alleged noncompliance with certain Risk Management Plan regulations under the Clean Air Act at its DBM complex. In addition, Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC, also a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, is currently in negotiations with the EPA and the Department of Justice with respect to alleged non-compliance with the leak detection and repair requirements of the federal Clean Air Act (“LDAR requirements”) at its Fort Lupton facility in the DJ Basin complex and WGR Operating, LP, another wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, is in negotiations with the EPA with respect to alleged non-compliance with LDAR requirements at its Granger, Wyoming facility. Although management cannot predict the outcome of settlement discussions in these matters, management believes that it is reasonably likely a resolution of these matters will result in a fine or penalty for each matter in excess of $100,000.
Except as discussed above, we are not a party to any legal, regulatory or administrative proceedings other than proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. Management believes that there are no such proceedings for which a final disposition could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition, or for which disclosure is otherwise required by Item 103 of Regulation S-K.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.


73

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

MARKET INFORMATION

Our common units are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “WES.” The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common units and the cash distribution per unit declared for the periods presented:
 
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
First
Quarter
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
High Price
 
$
52.89

 
$
57.15

 
$
61.78

 
$
67.44

Low Price
 
42.68

 
48.04

 
51.65

 
57.81

Distribution per common unit
 
0.920

 
0.905

 
0.890

 
0.875

2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
High Price
 
$
60.44

 
$
55.24

 
$
53.45

 
$
48.50

Low Price
 
52.52

 
46.85

 
39.73

 
25.40

Distribution per common unit
 
0.860

 
0.845

 
0.830

 
0.815


As of February 12, 2018 , there were 20 unitholders of record of our common units. This number does not include unitholders whose units are held in trust by other entities. The actual number of unitholders is greater than the number of holders of record. We have also issued and outstanding 2,583,068 general partner units and 13,243,883 Class C units; there is no established public trading market for any such units. All general partner units are held by our general partner and all Class C units are held by a subsidiary of Anadarko.

OTHER SECURITIES MATTERS

Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds. During the quarter ended December 31, 2017 , we issued 266,250 PIK Class C units with an implied fair value of $13.8 million to AMH, the holder of the Class C units. No proceeds were received as consideration for the issuance of the PIK Class C units. The PIK Class C units were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. All outstanding Class C units will convert into common units on a one-for-one basis on March 1, 2020, unless we elect to convert such units earlier or Anadarko extends the conversion date. For more information, see Note 3—Partnership Distributions and Note 4—Equity and Partners’ Capital in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. The WES LTIP permits the issuance of up to 2,250,000 units, all of which remain available for future issuance as of December 31, 2017 . Phantom unit grants under the WES 2008 LTIP have been made to each of the independent directors of our general partner and certain employees. Read the information under Part III, Item 12 of this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into this Item 5.


74

Table of Contents

SELECTED INFORMATION FROM OUR PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

Set forth below is a summary of the significant provisions of our partnership agreement that relate to cash distributions and the IDRs.

Available cash. Our partnership agreement requires us to distribute all of our available cash (as defined in our partnership agreement) to unitholders of record on the applicable record date within 45 days of the end of each quarter. The amount of available cash generally is all cash on hand at the end of the quarter, plus, at the discretion of our general partner, working capital borrowings made subsequent to the end of such quarter, less the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner to provide for the proper conduct of our business, including reserves to fund future capital expenditures; to comply with applicable laws, debt instruments or other agreements; or to provide funds for distributions to our unitholders and to our general partner for any one or more of the next four quarters. Working capital borrowings generally include borrowings made under a credit facility or similar financing arrangement. Working capital borrowings may only be those that, at the time of such borrowings, were intended to be repaid within 12 months. In all cases, working capital borrowings are used solely for working capital purposes or to fund distributions to partners. Class C units are disregarded with respect to distributions of available cash until they are converted into common units.

General partner interest and incentive distribution rights. As of December 31, 2017 , our general partner was entitled to 1.5% of all quarterly distributions that we make prior to our liquidation and, as the holder of the IDRs, was entitled to incentive distributions at the maximum distribution sharing percentage of 48.0% for all periods presented, after the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels had been achieved. The maximum distribution sharing percentage of 49.5% does not include any distributions that our general partner may receive on common units that it may acquire.


75

Table of Contents

Item 6.  Selected Financial and Operating Data

The following Summary Financial Information table shows our selected financial and operating data, which are derived from our consolidated financial statements for the periods and as of the dates indicated.
The term “Partnership assets” includes both the assets owned and the interests accounted for under the equity method by us as of December 31, 2017 (see Note 9—Equity Investments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K ). Because Anadarko controls us through its control of WGP, which owns the entire interest in our general partner, each acquisition of Partnership assets from Anadarko has been considered a transfer of net assets between entities under common control. As such, the Partnership assets we acquired from Anadarko were initially recorded at Anadarko’s historic carrying value, which did not correlate to the total acquisition price paid by us (see Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K ). Further, after an acquisition of Partnership assets from Anadarko, we may be required to recast our financial statements to include the activities of such Partnership assets from the date of common control. For those periods requiring recast, the consolidated financial statements for periods prior to our acquisition of Partnership assets from Anadarko have been prepared from Anadarko’s historical cost-basis accounts and may not necessarily be indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if we had owned the Partnership assets during the periods reported. For ease of reference, we refer to the historical financial results of the Partnership assets prior to our acquisitions from Anadarko as being “our” historical financial results.

Acquisitions. The following table presents the acquisitions completed by us for the periods presented in the Summary Financial Information table below. Our consolidated financial statements include the combined financial results and operations for: (i) affiliate acquisitions for all periods presented and (ii) third-party acquisitions since the acquisition date.
 
 
Acquisition Date
 
Percentage Acquired
 
Affiliate or Third-party Acquisition
Non-Operated Marcellus Interest (1)
 
03/01/2013
 
33.75
%
 
Anadarko
Marcellus Interest
 
03/08/2013
 
33.75
%
 
Third party
Mont Belvieu JV
 
06/05/2013
 
25
%
 
Third party
OTTCO
 
09/03/2013
 
100
%
 
Third party
TEFR Interests (2)
 
03/03/2014
 
Various (2)

 
Anadarko
DBM
 
11/25/2014
 
100
%
 
Third party
DBJV system
 
03/02/2015
 
50
%
 
Anadarko
Springfield system
 
03/14/2016
 
50.1
%
 
Anadarko
DBJV system (1)
 
03/17/2017
 
50
%
 
Third party
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
See Property exchange below.
(2)  
Acquired a 20% interest in each of TEG and TEP and a 33.33% interest in FRP.

Property exchange. On March 17, 2017, we acquired the Additional DBJV System Interest from a third party in exchange for the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest and $155.0 million of cash consideration. We previously held a 50% interest in, and operated, the DBJV system.

Divestitures. In June 2017, the Helper and Clawson systems, located in Utah, were sold to a third party. In October 2016, the Hugoton system, located in Southwest Kansas and Oklahoma, was sold to a third party. In July 2015, the Dew and Pinnacle systems in East Texas were sold to a third party.


76

Table of Contents

The information in the following table should be read together with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements , which are included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, and with the information under the captions How We Evaluate Our Operations , Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Financial Results , Results of Operations , and Key Performance Metrics under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of the expected impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) will have on future revenues and expenses.
thousands except per-unit data, throughput, Adjusted gross margin per Mcf and Adjusted gross margin per Bbl
 
Summary Financial Information
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
Statement of Operations Data (for the year ended):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues and other
 
$
2,248,356

 
$
1,804,270

 
$
1,752,072

 
$
1,533,377

 
$
1,200,060

Operating income (loss)
 
707,271

 
708,208

 
157,330

 
554,731

 
325,619

Net income (loss)
 
578,218

 
602,294

 
14,207

 
456,668

 
288,244

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
10,735

 
10,963

 
10,101

 
14,025

 
10,816

Net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP
 
567,483

 
591,331

 
4,106

 
442,643

 
277,428

Net income (loss) per common unit – basic
 
1.30

 
1.74

 
(1.95
)
 
2.13

 
1.83

Net income (loss) per common unit – diluted
 
1.30

 
1.74

 
(1.95
)
 
2.12

 
1.83

Distributions per unit
 
3.590

 
3.350

 
3.050

 
2.650

 
2.280

Balance Sheet Data (at year end):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
 
$
8,014,350

 
$
7,733,028

 
$
7,301,197

 
$
7,549,785

 
$
5,328,224

Total long-term liabilities
 
3,619,006

 
3,281,944

 
3,147,681

 
2,699,244

 
1,659,229

Total equity and partners’ capital
 
3,971,011

 
4,135,779

 
3,918,028

 
4,568,462

 
3,422,675

Cash Flow Data (for the year ended):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net cash flows provided by (used in):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating activities
 
$
901,495

 
$
917,585

 
$
785,645

 
$
694,495

 
$
601,335

Investing activities
 
(763,604
)
 
(1,105,534
)
 
(500,277
)
 
(2,740,175
)
 
(1,858,912
)
Financing activities
 
(417,002
)
 
447,841

 
(254,389
)
 
2,011,970

 
938,324

Capital expenditures
 
(673,638
)
 
(473,858
)
 
(637,503
)
 
(804,822
)
 
(851,771
)
Throughput (MMcf/d except throughput measured in barrels):
Total throughput for natural gas assets
 
3,680

 
4,064

 
4,300

 
3,984

 
3,611

Throughput attributable to noncontrolling interest for natural gas assets
 
105

 
124

 
142

 
165

 
168

Total throughput attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP for natural gas assets
 
3,575

 
3,940

 
4,158

 
3,819

 
3,443

Throughput for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets (MBbls/d)
 
201

 
184

 
186

 
154

 
62

Key Performance Metrics (for the year ended): (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted gross margin for natural gas assets
 
$
1,222,632

 
$
1,194,877

 
$
1,119,555

 
$
993,397

 
$
775,040

Adjusted gross margin for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets
 
153,846

 
142,566

 
131,492

 
103,102

 
31,664

Adjusted gross margin per Mcf for natural gas assets
 
0.94

 
0.83

 
0.74

 
0.71

 
0.62

Adjusted gross margin per Bbl for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets
 
2.10

 
2.11

 
1.93

 
1.84

 
1.40

Adjusted EBITDA
 
1,060,988

 
1,028,208

 
907,568

 
782,900

 
539,401

Distributable cash flow
 
928,967

 
852,446

 
781,383

 
661,133

 
455,238

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow are not defined in GAAP. For definitions and reconciliations of Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow to their most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, see How We Evaluate Our Operations under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.


77

Table of Contents

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion analyzes our financial condition and results of operations and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which are included under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K, and the information set forth in Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K.
The term “Partnership assets” includes both the assets owned and the interests accounted for under the equity method by us as of December 31, 2017 (see Note 9—Equity Investments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K ). Because Anadarko controls us through its control of WGP, which owns the entire interest in our general partner, each acquisition of Partnership assets from Anadarko has been considered a transfer of net assets between entities under common control. As such, the Partnership assets we acquired from Anadarko were initially recorded at Anadarko’s historic carrying value, which did not correlate to the total acquisition price paid by us (see Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K ). Further, after an acquisition of Partnership assets from Anadarko, we may be required to recast our financial statements to include the activities of such Partnership assets from the date of common control. For those periods requiring recast, the consolidated financial statements for periods prior to our acquisition of the Partnership assets from Anadarko have been prepared from Anadarko’s historical cost-basis accounts and may not necessarily be indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if we had owned the Partnership assets during the periods reported. For ease of reference, we refer to the historical financial results of the Partnership assets prior to our acquisitions from Anadarko as being “our” historical financial results.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

We are a growth-oriented Delaware MLP formed by Anadarko to acquire, own, develop and operate midstream assets. We currently own or have investments in assets located in the Rocky Mountains (Colorado, Utah and Wyoming), North-central Pennsylvania, Texas and New Mexico. We are engaged in the business of gathering, compressing, treating, processing and transporting natural gas; gathering, stabilizing and transporting condensate, NGLs and crude oil; and gathering and disposing of produced water. In addition, in our capacity as a processor of natural gas, we also buy and sell natural gas, NGLs or condensate under certain of our contracts. We provide these midstream services for Anadarko, as well as for third-party producers and customers. As of December 31, 2017 , our assets and investments consisted of the following:
 
 
Owned and
Operated
 
Operated
Interests
 
Non-Operated
Interests
 
Equity
Interests
Gathering systems (1)
 
12

 
3

 
3

 
2

Treating facilities
 
19

 
3

 

 
3

Natural gas processing plants/trains
 
20

 
4

 

 
2

NGL pipelines
 
2

 

 

 
3

Natural gas pipelines
 
5

 

 

 

Oil pipelines
 

 
1

 

 
1

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Includes the DBM water systems.

Significant financial and operational events during the year ended December 31, 2017 , included the following:

In March 2017, we acquired the Additional DBJV System Interest from a third party in exchange for the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest and $155.0 million of cash consideration, resulting in a net gain of $125.7 million . See  Acquisitions and Divestitures  under Part I, Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

In May 2017, we reached an agreement with Anadarko to settle the outstanding Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko, arising from our acquisition of DBJV, whereby we made a cash payment to Anadarko of $37.3 million during the second quarter of 2017.


78

Table of Contents

On March 1, 2017, 50% of the outstanding Series A Preferred units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis, and on May 2, 2017, all remaining Series A Preferred units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis. See  Equity Offerings  under Part I, Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

We commenced operation of the DBM water systems in the second quarter of 2017 and Train VI at the DBM complex (with capacity of 200 MMcf/d) in the fourth quarter of 2017.

In June 2017, we closed on the sale of our Helper and Clawson systems, which resulted in a net gain on divestiture of $16.3 million . See  Acquisitions and Divestitures  under Part I, Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

In February 2017, Anadarko elected to extend the conversion date of the Class C units from December 31, 2017, to March 1, 2020.

We received $52.9 million in cash proceeds from insurers in final settlement of our claims related to the incident at the DBM complex, including $29.9 million for business interruption insurance claims and $23.0 million for property insurance claims. See  Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Financial Results within this Item 7 for additional information.

We raised our distribution to $0.920 per unit for the fourth quarter of 2017 , representing a 2% increase over the distribution for the third quarter of 2017 and a 7% increase over the distribution for the fourth quarter of 2016 .

Throughput attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP for natural gas assets totaled 3,575 MMcf/d for the year ended December 31, 2017 , representing a 9% decrease compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 .

Throughput for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets totaled 201 MBbls/d for the year ended December 31, 2017 , representing a 9% increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 .

Operating income (loss) was $707.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , which was approximately the same as for the year ended December 31, 2016 .

Adjusted gross margin for natural gas assets (as defined under the caption How We Evaluate Our Operations within this Item 7 ) averaged $0.94 per Mcf for the year ended December 31, 2017 , representing a 13% increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 .

Adjusted gross margin for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets (as defined under the caption How We Evaluate Our Operations within this Item 7 ) averaged $2.10 per Bbl for the year ended December 31, 2017 , which was approximately the same as for the year ended December 31, 2016 .

Anadarko’s Colorado Response. Following a home explosion in Firestone, Colorado in April 2017, Anadarko took precautionary measures to shut in all operated vertical wells in the DJ Basin to conduct additional inspections. It subsequently tested and permanently plugged, abandoned, and capped all one-inch return lines associated with these wells. In May 2017, the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission issued a two-phase Notice to Operators (“NTO”) requiring all operators to inventory and integrity test existing flowlines within 1,000 feet of a building unit and abandon all inactive flowlines in such areas. During the third quarter, Anadarko substantially completed the requirements of the NTO. In August 2017, following a three-month review of oil and gas operations, the Governor of Colorado announced several policy initiatives designed to enhance public safety, which are to be implemented over the next several months through rulemaking or legislation. Anadarko continues to work cooperatively with state regulators and others and is also cooperating with the NTSB in its investigation related to the incident.


79

Table of Contents

OUR OPERATIONS

Our results are driven primarily by the volumes of natural gas, NGLs, crude oil and produced water we service through our systems. In our operations, we contract with producers and customers to provide midstream services focused on natural gas, NGLs, crude oil and produced water. We gather natural gas from individual wells or production facilities located near our gathering systems and the natural gas may be compressed and delivered to a processing plant, treating facility or downstream pipeline, and ultimately to end users. We treat and process a significant portion of the natural gas that we gather so that it will satisfy required specifications for pipeline transportation. We gather crude oil from individual wells or production facilities located near our gathering systems, and in some cases, treat or stabilize the crude oil to satisfy required specifications for pipeline transportation. We also gather and dispose of produced water.
We currently have operations in Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, North-central Pennsylvania, Texas and New Mexico, with a substantial portion of our business concentrated in the Rocky Mountains. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2017, 28% of our throughput for natural gas assets (excluding equity investment throughput) and 40% of our Adjusted gross margin was attributable to our DJ Basin complex.
For the year ended December 31, 2017 , 61% of our total revenues and 41% of our throughput (excluding equity investment throughput) were attributable to transactions with Anadarko. We also recognized capital contributions from Anadarko of $58.6 million related to the above-market component of our commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko (see Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). Anadarko supports our operations by providing dedications and/or minimum volume commitments with respect to a substantial portion of our throughput.
For the year ended December 31, 2017 , 94% of our Adjusted gross margin was attributable to fee-based contracts, under which a fixed fee is received based on the volume or thermal content of the natural gas and on the volume of NGLs, crude oil and produced water we gather, process, treat, transport or dispose. This type of contract provides us with a relatively stable revenue stream that is not subject to direct commodity price risk, except to the extent that (i) we retain and sell drip condensate that is recovered during the gathering of natural gas from the wellhead or (ii) actual recoveries differ from contractual recoveries under a limited number of processing agreements.
For the year ended December 31, 2017 , 6% of our Adjusted gross margin was attributable to percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts, pursuant to which we have commodity price exposure. See How We Evaluate Our Operations within this Item 7. A majority of the commodity price risk associated with our percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts is hedged under commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko, with such agreements set to expire on December 31, 2018.
For the year ended December 31, 2017 , 96% of our Adjusted gross margin was derived from either long-term, fee-based contracts or from percent-of-proceeds or keep-whole contracts that were hedged with commodity price swap agreements. See Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A and Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
We also have indirect exposure to commodity price risk in that the relatively volatile commodity price environment has caused and may continue to cause current or potential customers to delay drilling or shut in production in certain areas, which would reduce the volumes of hydrocarbons available for our systems. We also bear a limited degree of commodity price risk through settlement of imbalances. Read Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk under Part II of this Form 10-K.
As a result of our acquisitions from Anadarko and third parties, our results of operations, financial position and cash flows may vary significantly in future periods. See Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Financial Results , set forth below in this Item 7.


80

Table of Contents

HOW WE EVALUATE OUR OPERATIONS

Our management relies on certain financial and operational metrics to analyze our performance. These metrics are significant factors in assessing our operating results and profitability and include (1) throughput, (2) operating and maintenance expenses, (3) general and administrative expenses, (4) Adjusted gross margin (as defined below), (5) Adjusted EBITDA (as defined below) and (6) Distributable cash flow (as defined below).

Throughput. Throughput is an essential operating variable we use in assessing our ability to generate revenues. In order to maintain or increase throughput on our systems, we must connect to additional wells or production facilities. Our success in maintaining or increasing throughput is impacted by the successful drilling of new wells by producers that are dedicated to our systems, recompletions of existing wells connected to our systems, our ability to secure volumes from new wells drilled on non-dedicated acreage and our ability to attract natural gas, NGLs, crude oil or produced water volumes currently serviced by our competitors. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , we added 347 receipt points to our systems.

Operating and maintenance expenses. We monitor operating and maintenance expenses to assess the impact of such costs on the profitability of our assets and to evaluate the overall efficiency of our operations. Operating and maintenance expenses include, among other things, field labor, insurance, repair and maintenance, equipment rentals, contract services, utility costs and services provided to us or on our behalf. For periods commencing on the date of and subsequent to our acquisition of the Partnership assets, certain of these expenses are incurred under and governed by our services and secondment agreement with Anadarko.

General and administrative expenses. To help ensure the appropriateness of our general and administrative expenses and maximize our cash available for distribution, we monitor such expenses through comparison to prior periods and to the annual budget approved by our Board of Directors. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, Anadarko and our general partner perform centralized corporate functions for us. General and administrative expenses for periods prior to our acquisition of the Partnership assets include costs allocated by Anadarko in the form of a management services fee, which approximated the general and administrative costs incurred by Anadarko attributable to the Partnership assets. For periods subsequent to our acquisition of the Partnership assets, Anadarko is no longer compensated for corporate services through a management services fee. Instead, allocations and reimbursements of general and administrative expenses are determined by Anadarko in its reasonable discretion, in accordance with our partnership and omnibus agreements. Amounts required to be reimbursed to Anadarko under the omnibus agreement also include those expenses attributable to our status as a publicly traded partnership, such as the following:

expenses associated with annual and quarterly reporting;

tax return and Schedule K-1 preparation and distribution expenses;

expenses associated with listing on the NYSE; and

independent auditor fees, legal expenses, investor relations expenses, director fees, and registrar and transfer agent fees.

See further detail in Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


81

Table of Contents

Non-GAAP financial measures

Adjusted gross margin attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP. We define Adjusted gross margin attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP (“Adjusted gross margin”) as total revenues and other, less cost of product and reimbursements for electricity-related expenses recorded as revenue, plus distributions from equity investments and excluding the noncontrolling interest owner’s proportionate share of revenue and cost of product. We believe Adjusted gross margin is an important performance measure of the core profitability of our operations, as well as our operating performance as compared to that of other companies in the midstream industry. Cost of product expenses include (i) costs associated with the purchase of natural gas and NGLs pursuant to our percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole processing contracts, (ii) costs associated with the valuation of our gas imbalances, and (iii) costs associated with our obligations under certain contracts to redeliver a volume of natural gas to shippers, which is thermally equivalent to condensate retained by us and sold to third parties. These expenses are subject to variability, although a majority of our exposure to commodity price risk inherent in our percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts is mitigated through our commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko. For a discussion of commodity price swap agreements, see Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A and Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
To facilitate investor and industry analyst comparisons between us and our peers, we also disclose Adjusted gross margin per Mcf for natural gas assets and Adjusted gross margin per Bbl for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets . See Key Performance Metrics within this Item 7.

Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP. We define Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP (“Adjusted EBITDA”) as net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP, plus distributions from equity investments, non-cash equity-based compensation expense, interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, impairments, and other expense (including lower of cost or market inventory adjustments recorded in cost of product), less gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net, income from equity investments, interest income, income tax benefit, and other income. We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA provides information useful to investors in assessing our financial condition and results of operations and that Adjusted EBITDA is a widely accepted financial indicator of a company’s ability to incur and service debt, fund capital expenditures and make distributions. Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental financial measure that management and external users of our consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, commercial banks and rating agencies, use to assess the following, among other measures:

our operating performance as compared to other publicly traded partnerships in the midstream industry, without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;

the ability of our assets to generate cash flow to make distributions; and

the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the returns on investment of various investment opportunities.

Distributable cash flow. We define “Distributable cash flow” as Adjusted EBITDA, plus interest income and the net settlement amounts from the sale and/or purchase of natural gas, condensate and NGLs under our commodity price swap agreements to the extent such amounts are not recognized as Adjusted EBITDA, less net cash paid (or to be paid) for interest expense (including amortization of deferred debt issuance costs originally paid in cash, offset by non-cash capitalized interest), maintenance capital expenditures, Series A Preferred unit distributions and income taxes. We compare Distributable cash flow to the cash distributions we expect to pay our unitholders. Using this measure, management can quickly compute the Coverage ratio of distributable cash flow to planned cash distributions. We believe Distributable cash flow is useful to investors because this measurement is used by many companies, analysts and others in the industry as a performance measurement tool to evaluate our operating and financial performance and compare it with the performance of other publicly traded partnerships.
While Distributable cash flow is a measure we use to assess our ability to make distributions to our unitholders, it should not be viewed as indicative of the actual amount of cash that we have available for distributions or that we plan to distribute for a given period. Furthermore, to the extent Distributable cash flow includes realized amounts recorded as capital contributions from Anadarko attributable to activity under our commodity price swap agreements, it is not a reflection of our ability to generate cash from operations.


82

Table of Contents

Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures. Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow are not defined in GAAP. The GAAP measure used by us that is most directly comparable to Adjusted gross margin is operating income (loss), while net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP and net cash provided by operating activities are the GAAP measures used by us that are most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA. The GAAP measure used by us that is most directly comparable to Distributable cash flow is net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP. Our non-GAAP financial measures of Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow should not be considered as alternatives to the GAAP measures of operating income (loss), net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP, net cash provided by operating activities or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow have important limitations as analytical tools because they exclude some, but not all, items that affect operating income (loss), net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP and net cash provided by operating activities. Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Our definitions of Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies in our industry, thereby diminishing their utility.
Management compensates for the limitations of Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow as analytical tools by reviewing the comparable GAAP measures, understanding the differences between Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow compared to (as applicable) operating income (loss), net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP and net cash provided by operating activities, and incorporating this knowledge into its decision-making processes. We believe that investors benefit from having access to the same financial measures that our management uses in evaluating our operating results.
The following tables present (a) a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of operating income (loss) to the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted gross margin, (b) a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measures of net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP and net cash provided by operating activities to the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA and (c) a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP to the non-GAAP financial measure of Distributable cash flow:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Reconciliation of Operating income (loss) to Adjusted gross margin
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income (loss)
 
$
707,271


$
708,208


$
157,330

Add:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions from equity investments
 
110,465

 
103,423

 
98,298

Operation and maintenance
 
315,994

 
308,010

 
331,972

General and administrative
 
47,796

 
45,591

 
41,319

Property and other taxes
 
46,818

 
40,145

 
33,288

Depreciation and amortization
 
290,874

 
272,933

 
272,611

Impairments
 
178,374

 
15,535

 
515,458

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net
 
132,388

 
(14,641
)
 
57,024

Proceeds from business interruption insurance claims
 
29,882

 
16,270

 

Equity income, net – affiliates
 
85,194

 
78,717

 
71,251

Reimbursed electricity-related charges recorded as revenues
 
56,823

 
59,733

 
54,175

Adjusted gross margin attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
16,827

 
16,323

 
16,779

Adjusted gross margin
 
$
1,376,478

 
$
1,337,443

 
$
1,251,047

Adjusted gross margin for natural gas assets
 
$
1,222,632

 
$
1,194,877

 
$
1,119,555

Adjusted gross margin for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets
 
153,846

 
142,566

 
131,492



83

Table of Contents

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Reconciliation of Net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP to Adjusted EBITDA
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP
 
$
567,483

 
$
591,331

 
$
4,106

Add:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions from equity investments
 
110,465

 
103,423

 
98,298

Non-cash equity-based compensation expense
 
4,947

 
5,591

 
4,402

Interest expense
 
142,386

 
114,921

 
113,872

Income tax expense
 
4,905

 
8,372

 
45,532

Depreciation and amortization (1)
 
288,087

 
270,311

 
270,004

Impairments
 
178,374

 
15,535

 
515,458

Other expense (1)
 
145

 
224

 
1,290

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net
 
132,388

 
(14,641
)
 
57,024

Equity income, net – affiliates
 
85,194

 
78,717

 
71,251

Interest income – affiliates
 
16,900

 
16,900

 
16,900

Other income (1)
 
1,283

 
524

 
219

Income tax benefit
 
39

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
1,060,988

 
$
1,028,208

 
$
907,568

Reconciliation of Net cash provided by operating activities to Adjusted EBITDA
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
$
901,495

 
$
917,585

 
$
785,645

Interest (income) expense, net
 
125,486

 
98,021

 
96,972

Uncontributed cash-based compensation awards
 
25

 
856

 
214

Accretion and amortization of long-term obligations, net
 
(4,254
)
 
3,789

 
(17,698
)
Current income tax (benefit) expense
 
2,408

 
5,817

 
34,186

Other (income) expense, net
 
(1,299
)
 
(479
)
 
619

Distributions from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings – affiliates
 
23,085

 
21,238

 
16,244

Changes in operating working capital:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts receivable, net
 
16,127

 
48,947

 
4,371

Accounts and imbalance payables and accrued liabilities, net
 
6,930

 
(58,359
)
 
(1,006
)
Other, net
 
4,491

 
4,367

 
720

Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
(13,506
)
 
(13,574
)
 
(12,699
)
Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
1,060,988

 
$
1,028,208

 
$
907,568

Cash flow information of Western Gas Partners, LP
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
$
901,495

 
$
917,585

 
$
785,645

Net cash used in investing activities
 
(763,604
)
 
(1,105,534
)
 
(500,277
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 
(417,002
)
 
447,841

 
(254,389
)
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Includes our 75% share of depreciation and amortization; other expense; and other income attributable to the Chipeta complex. Other expense also includes $0.1 million , $0.2 million and $0.4 million of lower of cost or market inventory adjustments, primarily at the DBM complex for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015, respectively.

84

Table of Contents

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except Coverage ratio
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Reconciliation of Net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP to Distributable cash flow and calculation of the Coverage ratio
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP
 
$
567,483

 
$
591,331

 
$
4,106

Add:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions from equity investments
 
110,465

 
103,423

 
98,298

Non-cash equity-based compensation expense
 
4,947

 
5,591

 
4,402

Non-cash settled interest expense, net (1)
 
71

 
(7,747
)
 
14,400

Income tax (benefit) expense
 
4,866

 
8,372

 
45,532

Depreciation and amortization (2)
 
288,087

 
270,311

 
270,004

Impairments
 
178,374

 
15,535

 
515,458

Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (3)
 
58,551

 
45,820

 
18,449

Other expense (2)
 
145

 
224

 
1,290

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net
 
132,388

 
(14,641
)
 
57,024

Equity income, net – affiliates
 
85,194

 
78,717

 
71,251

Cash paid for maintenance capital expenditures  (2)
 
49,684

 
63,630

 
53,882

Capitalized interest
 
6,826

 
5,562

 
8,318

Cash paid for (reimbursement of) income taxes
 
1,194

 
838

 
(138
)
Series A Preferred unit distributions
 
7,453

 
45,784

 

Other income (2)
 
1,283

 
524

 
219

Distributable cash flow
 
$
928,967

 
$
852,446

 
$
781,383

Distributions declared   (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Limited partners – common units
 
$
538,244

 
 
 
 
General partner
 
286,624

 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
824,868

 
 
 
 
Coverage ratio
 
1.13

x
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Includes amounts related to the Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko. See Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .
(2)  
Includes our 75% share of depreciation and amortization; other expense; cash paid for maintenance capital expenditures; and other income attributable to the Chipeta complex. Other expense also includes $0.1 million , $0.2 million and $0.4 million of lower of cost or market inventory adjustments, primarily at the DBM complex for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(3)  
See Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .
(4)  
Reflects cash distributions of $3.590 per unit declared for the year ended December 31, 2017 , including the cash distribution of $0.920 per unit paid on February 13, 2018, for the fourth-quarter 2017 distribution.


85

Table of Contents

ITEMS AFFECTING THE COMPARABILITY OF OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS

Our historical results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented may not be comparable to future or historic results of operations or cash flows for the reasons described below. Refer to Operating Results within this Item 7 for a discussion of our results of operations as compared to the prior periods. Further, see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of the expected impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) will have on future revenues and expenses.

Gathering and processing agreements. Certain of the gathering agreements for the Haley, DBJV and Springfield systems allow for rate resets that target an agreed-upon rate of return over the life of the agreement. See Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Commodity price swap agreements. We have commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko to mitigate exposure to a majority of the commodity price risk inherent in our percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts.
On December 20, 2017 , we renewed our commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko for the DJ Basin complex and the MGR assets through December 31, 2018, with an effective date of January 1, 2018. Revenues or costs attributable to volumes settled during the respective agreement period, at the applicable market price, are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. We also record a capital contribution from Anadarko in our consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital for the amount by which the swap price exceeds the applicable market price. See Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A and Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.

Income taxes. Income we have earned on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of the Partnership assets is subject only to Texas margin tax because we are a non-taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
With respect to assets acquired from Anadarko, we record Anadarko’s historic current and deferred income taxes for the periods prior to our ownership of the assets. For periods subsequent to our acquisitions from Anadarko, we are not subject to tax except for the Texas margin tax and, accordingly, do not record current and deferred federal income taxes related to such assets.

Acquisitions and divestitures. See Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

DBJV acquisition. In March 2015, we acquired Anadarko’s interest in DBJV for an anticipated cash payment of $282.8 million due to Anadarko on March 31, 2020. In May 2017, we reached an agreement with Anadarko to settle this obligation with a cash payment to Anadarko of $37.3 million, which was equal to the estimated net present value of the obligation at March 31, 2017.

Dew and Pinnacle divestiture. In July 2015, the Dew and Pinnacle systems in East Texas were sold to a third party, resulting in a net gain on sale of $77.3 million recorded as Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations.

Hugoton divestiture. In October 2016, the Hugoton system, located in Southwest Kansas and Oklahoma, was sold to a third party, resulting in a net loss on sale of $12.0 million recorded as Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations.

Property exchange. On March 17, 2017, we acquired the Additional DBJV System Interest from a third party in exchange for the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest and $155.0 million of cash consideration. We previously held a 50% interest in, and operated, the DBJV system. The Property Exchange resulted in a net gain of $125.7 million recorded as Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations. Results of operations attributable to the Property Exchange were included in the consolidated statements of operations beginning on the acquisition date in the first quarter of 2017.

Helper and Clawson divestiture . In June 2017, the Helper and Clawson systems, located in Utah, were sold to a third party, resulting in a net gain on sale of $16.3 million recorded as Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations.

86

Table of Contents

DBM complex. On December 3, 2015, there was an initial fire and secondary explosion at the processing facility within the DBM complex. The majority of the damage was to the liquid handling facilities and the amine treating units at the inlet of the complex. Train II sustained the most damage of the processing trains and returned to service in December 2016. Train III experienced minimal damage and returned to full service in May 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2015, $20.3 million of losses were recorded in Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations, related to this involuntary conversion event based on the difference between the net book value of the affected assets and the insurance claim receivable. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , a $5.7 million loss was recorded in Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations, related to a change in the estimate of the amount that would be recovered under the property insurance claim based on further discussions with insurers. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we received $52.9 million and $33.8 million , respectively, in cash proceeds from insurers related to the incident at the DBM complex, including $29.9 million and $16.3 million , respectively, in proceeds from business interruption insurance claims and $23.0 million and $17.5 million , respectively, in proceeds from property insurance claims. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the consolidated balance sheets included receivables of zero and $30.0 million, respectively, for the property insurance claim related to the incident at the DBM complex. For ease of reference throughout the remainder of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis, the damage to the processing facility and resulting lack of processing capacity and associated financial statement impact are referred to as the “DBM outage.” See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Impairments. During 2015, we recognized impairments of $280.2 million at the Red Desert complex and $220.9 million at the Hilight system triggered by a reduction in estimated future cash flows caused by the low commodity price environment and resulting reduced producer drilling activity and related throughput. During 2017, we recognized an impairment of $158.8 million at the Granger complex due to a reduced throughput fee as a result of a producer’s bankruptcy.

GENERAL TRENDS AND OUTLOOK

We expect our business to continue to be affected by the following key trends and uncertainties. Our expectations are based on assumptions made by us and information currently available to us. To the extent our underlying assumptions about, or interpretations of, available information prove to be incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from expected results.

Impact of crude oil, natural gas and NGL prices. Crude oil, natural gas and NGL prices can fluctuate significantly, and have done so over time. These fluctuations in commodity prices affect the overall level of our customers’ activity and how our customers allocate their capital within their own portfolio of assets. The relatively volatile commodity price environment over the past decade has impacted drilling activity in several of the basins served by our assets. Many of our customers, including Anadarko, have shifted capital spending towards opportunities with superior economics and reduced activity in other areas. To the extent possible, we will continue to connect new wells or production facilities to our systems to mitigate the impact of natural production declines in order to maintain throughput on our systems. However, our success in connecting additional wells or production facilities is dependent on the activity levels of our customers. Additionally, we will continue to evaluate the crude oil, NGL and natural gas price environments and adjust our capital spending plans to reflect our customers’ anticipated activity levels, while maintaining appropriate liquidity and financial flexibility.


87

Table of Contents

Liquidity and access to capital markets. Under the terms of our partnership agreement, we are required to distribute all of our available cash to our unitholders, which makes us dependent upon raising capital to fund growth projects and acquisitions. Historically, we have accessed the debt and equity capital markets to raise money for growth projects and acquisitions. From time to time, capital market turbulence and investor sentiment towards MLPs have raised our cost of capital and, in some cases, temporarily made certain sources of capital unavailable. If we are unable either to access the capital markets or find alternative sources of capital at reasonable costs, our growth strategy will be more challenging to execute.

Changes in regulations. Our operations and the operations of our customers have been, and will continue to be, affected by political developments and federal, state, tribal, local and other laws and regulations that are becoming more numerous, more stringent and more complex. These laws and regulations include, among other things, limitations on hydraulic fracturing and other oil and gas operations, pipeline safety and integrity requirements, permitting requirements, environmental protection measures such as limitations on methane and other GHG emissions, and restrictions on produced water disposal wells. In addition, in certain areas in which we operate, public protests of oil and gas operations are becoming more frequent. Previously unsuccessful ballot initiatives that would impose setback requirements are being revived in Colorado, and we anticipate that regulation of the oil and gas industry will be an issue in that state’s upcoming gubernatorial election. The number and scope of the regulations with which we and our customers must comply has a meaningful impact on our and their businesses, and new or revised regulations, reinterpretations of existing regulations, and permitting delays or denials could adversely affect both the throughput on and profitability of our assets.

Impact of inflation. Although inflation in the United States has been relatively low in recent years, the U.S. economy could experience a significant inflationary effect from, among other things, the recent U.S. income tax reform and the governmental stimulus plans enacted since 2008. To the extent permitted by regulations and escalation provisions in certain of our existing agreements, we have the ability to recover a portion of increased costs in the form of higher fees.

Impact of interest rates. Overall, both short- and longer-term interest rates remained low during 2017 relative to historical averages. However, short-term interest rates experienced a sharp increase in response to the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) raising its target range for the federal funds rate three separate times during 2017. These increases, and any future increases, in the federal funds rate will ultimately result in an increase in our financing costs. Additionally, as with other yield-oriented securities, our unit price is impacted by the level of our cash distributions and an associated implied distribution yield. Therefore, changes in interest rates, either positive or negative, may affect the yield requirements of investors who invest in our units, and a rising interest rate environment could have an adverse impact on our unit price and our ability to issue additional equity, or increase the cost of issuing equity, to make acquisitions, reduce debt or for other purposes. However, we expect our cost of capital to remain competitive, as our competitors would face similar circumstances.

Acquisition opportunities. A key component of our growth strategy is to acquire midstream assets from Anadarko and third parties over time. As of December 31, 2017 , Anadarko’s total domestic midstream asset portfolio, excluding the assets we own, consisted of three gathering systems, 2,902 miles of pipeline, 20 processing and/or treating facilities, three oil pipelines, one NGL pipeline and four produced water disposal systems.
We may also pursue certain asset acquisitions from third parties to the extent such acquisitions complement our or Anadarko’s existing asset base or allow us to capture operational efficiencies from Anadarko’s or third-party production. However, if we do not make additional acquisitions from Anadarko or third parties on economically acceptable terms, including as a result of increases in our overall cost of capital, our future growth could be limited, and the acquisitions we make could reduce, rather than increase, our cash flows generated from operations on a per-unit basis.
We have from time to time discussed, and may discuss in the future, various transactions that would result in a simplification of our capital structure, including the potential modification or elimination of our IDRs. To date, no proposals have been made. Future evaluation of any such transaction, if any, will be based on a variety of factors, including general industry and market conditions. As a result, we can provide no assurance regarding the likelihood, timing or structure of any such transaction. If consummated, a simplification transaction could be dilutive to the holders of our common units and reduce the rate of our future distribution growth.


88

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OPERATING RESULTS

The following tables and discussion present a summary of our results of operations:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Total revenues and other   (1)
 
$
2,248,356

 
$
1,804,270

 
$
1,752,072

Equity income, net – affiliates
 
85,194

 
78,717

 
71,251

Total operating expenses   (1)
 
1,788,549

 
1,176,408

 
1,723,017

Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net
 
132,388

 
(14,641
)
 
57,024

Proceeds from business interruption insurance claims (2)
 
29,882

 
16,270

 

Operating income (loss)
 
707,271

 
708,208

 
157,330

Interest income – affiliates
 
16,900

 
16,900

 
16,900

Interest expense
 
(142,386
)
 
(114,921
)
 
(113,872
)
Other income (expense), net
 
1,299

 
479

 
(619
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
583,084

 
610,666

 
59,739

Income tax (benefit) expense
 
4,866

 
8,372

 
45,532

Net income (loss)
 
578,218

 
602,294

 
14,207

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
10,735

 
10,963

 
10,101

Net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP
 
$
567,483

 
$
591,331

 
$
4,106

Key performance metrics   (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted gross margin
 
$
1,376,478

 
$
1,337,443

 
$
1,251,047

Adjusted EBITDA
 
1,060,988

 
1,028,208

 
907,568

Distributable cash flow
 
928,967

 
852,446

 
781,383

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Revenues and other include amounts earned from services provided to our affiliates, as well as from the sale of residue and NGLs to our affiliates. Operating expenses include amounts charged by our affiliates for services as well as reimbursement of amounts paid by affiliates to third parties on our behalf. See Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .
(2)  
See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .
(3)  
Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow are defined under the caption Key Performance Metrics within this Item 7 . For reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, see How We Evaluate Our Operations–Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures within this Item 7 .

For purposes of the following discussion, any increases or decreases “for the year ended December 31, 2017 ” refer to the comparison of the year ended December 31, 2017 , to the year ended December 31, 2016 , and any increases or decreases “for the year ended December 31, 2016 ” refer to the comparison of the year ended December 31, 2016 , to the year ended December 31, 2015 .


89


Throughput
 
 
Year Ended December 31,

 
2017
 
2016
 
Inc/
(Dec)
 
2015
 
Inc/
(Dec)
Throughput for natural gas assets (MMcf/d)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gathering, treating and transportation
 
958

 
1,537

 
(38
)%
 
1,791

 
(14
)%
Processing
 
2,563

 
2,350

 
9
 %
 
2,331

 
1
 %
Equity investment (1)
 
159

 
177

 
(10
)%
 
178

 
(1
)%
Total throughput for natural gas assets
 
3,680

 
4,064

 
(9
)%
 
4,300

 
(5
)%
Throughput attributable to noncontrolling interest for natural gas assets
 
105

 
124

 
(15
)%
 
142

 
(13
)%
Total throughput attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP for natural gas assets
 
3,575

 
3,940

 
(9
)%
 
4,158

 
(5
)%
Throughput for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets (MBbls/d)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gathering, treating, transportation and disposal
 
71

 
57

 
25
 %
 
69

 
(17
)%
Equity investment (2)
 
130

 
127

 
2
 %
 
117

 
9
 %
Total throughput for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets
 
201

 
184

 
9
 %
 
186

 
(1
)%
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Represents our 14.81% share of average Fort Union throughput and 22% share of average Rendezvous throughput.
(2)  
Represents our 10% share of average White Cliffs throughput, 25% share of average Mont Belvieu JV throughput, 20% share of average TEG and TEP throughput, and 33.33% share of average FRP throughput.

Natural gas assets

Gathering, treating and transportation throughput decrease d by 579 MMcf/d for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to the Property Exchange in March 2017 (decrease of 399 MMcf/d), production declines in the areas around the Marcellus Interest (decrease of 44 MMcf/d) and Springfield gas gathering systems (decrease of 44 MMcf/d), and the sale of the Hugoton system in October 2016 (decrease of 44 MMcf/d).
Gathering, treating and transportation throughput decrease d by 254 MMcf/d for the year ended December 31, 2016 , primarily due to decreased throughput at the Bison facility due to volumes being diverted to a third-party treater and the sale of the Dew and Pinnacle systems in July 2015.
Processing throughput increase d by 213  MMcf/d for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to the DBM outage in 2016, the start-up of Train IV and Train V at the DBM complex in May 2016 and October 2016, respectively, and increased production in the areas around the DJ Basin complex. These increases were partially offset by production declines in the areas around the Chipeta complex and MGR assets.
Processing throughput increase d by 19 MMcf/d for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to increased production in the areas around the DJ Basin complex and the start-up of Train IV at the DBM complex in May 2016. These increases were partially offset by production declines around the Chipeta and Granger complexes, the MGR assets, and the Hilight system.
Equity investment throughput decrease d by 18 MMcf/d for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to decrease d throughput at the Rendezvous and Fort Union systems due to production declines in the area.


90


Crude oil, NGL and produced water assets

Gathering, treating, transportation and disposal throughput increase d by 14 MBbls/d for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to throughput from the DBM water systems, which commenced operation during the second quarter of 2017, partially offset by decreased throughput at the Springfield oil gathering system due to production declines in the area. Equity investment throughput increase d by 3 MBbls/d for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to increased volumes on FRP and TEG as a result of increased NGL production and an increase at the Mont Belvieu JV due to higher inlet throughput. These increases were partially offset by decreased throughput at White Cliffs as a result of a competitive pipeline commencing service in September 2016.
Gathering, treating, transportation and disposal throughput decrease d by 12 MBbls/d for the year ended December 31, 2016 , primarily due to decreased throughput at the Springfield oil gathering system due to production declines in the area. Equity investment throughput increase d by 10 MBbls/d for the year ended December 31, 2016 , primarily due to an increase in volumes on FRP as a result of increased production in the DJ Basin area.

Gathering, Processing, Transportation and Disposal Revenues
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except percentages
 
2017
 
2016
 
Inc/
(Dec)
 
2015
 
Inc/
(Dec)
Gathering, processing, transportation and disposal revenues
 
$
1,237,949

 
$
1,227,849

 
1
%
 
$
1,128,838

 
9
%

Revenues from gathering, processing, transportation and disposal increase d by $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to increase s of (i) $88.7 million at the DBM complex due to increased throughput (see Operating Results–Throughput within this Item 7 ), (ii) $39.1 million at the DJ Basin complex due to a higher processing fee ($29.4 million) and increased throughput ($9.7 million) and (iii) $9.2 million at the DBM water systems, which commenced operation during the second quarter of 2017. These increases were partially offset by decreases of (i) $42.9 million due to the Property Exchange in March 2017, (ii) $31.7 million at the Springfield system and $14.0 million at the Chipeta complex due to throughput decreases, (iii) $16.0 million due to the sale of the Hugoton system in October 2016, (iv) $9.7 million at the Granger complex due to a lower processing fee and (v) $9.0 million at the Marcellus Interest systems due to decreased throughput.
Revenues from gathering, processing, transportation and disposal increase d by $99.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to increases of (i) $114.0 million at the DJ Basin complex resulting from increased throughput ($108.4 million) and a higher gathering fee ($5.6 million), as well as (ii) $19.8 million at the DBM complex due to increased throughput and a higher processing fee. These increases were partially offset by decreases of (i) $22.0 million at the Springfield system due to a decrease in throughput and (ii) $17.6 million due to the sale of the Dew and Pinnacle systems in July 2015.


91


Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Sales
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except percentages and per-unit amounts
 
2017
 
2016
 
Inc/
(Dec)
 
2015
 
Inc/
(Dec)
Natural gas sales (1)
 
$
382,303

 
$
230,366

 
66
%
 
$
242,826

 
(5
)%
Natural gas liquids sales (1)
 
607,630

 
341,947

 
78
%
 
375,123

 
(9
)%
Total
 
$
989,933

 
$
572,313

 
73
%
 
$
617,949

 
(7
)%
Average price per unit (1) :
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Natural gas (per Mcf)
 
$
2.92

 
$
2.51

 
16
%
 
$
3.28

 
(23
)%
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl)
 
23.24

 
19.96

 
16
%
 
22.38

 
(11
)%
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Excludes amounts considered above market with respect to our swap agreements for the MGR assets, DJ Basin complex and Hugoton system (until its divestiture in October 2016) that were recorded as capital contributions in the consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital. See Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .

For the year ended December 31, 2017 , average natural gas and NGL prices included the effects of commodity price swap agreements attributable to sales for the MGR assets and DJ Basin complex. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, average natural gas and NGL prices included the effects of commodity price swap agreements attributable to sales for the Hugoton system (until its divestiture in October 2016), MGR assets and DJ Basin complex. See Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A and Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .
The increase in natural gas sales of $151.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , was primarily due to increase s of (i) $93.4 million at the DBM complex due to an increase in average price and volumes sold (see Operating Results–Throughput within this Item 7 ) and (ii) $64.2 million at the DJ Basin complex due to an increase in the swap market price and volumes sold. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $12.3 million at the MGR assets due to the partial equity treatment of the above-market swap agreement beginning January 1, 2017.
The decrease in natural gas sales of $12.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 , was primarily due to decrease s of (i) $9.9 million at the Hilight system due to a decrease in average price and volumes sold, (ii) $5.5 million at the DJ Basin complex due to the partial equity treatment of the above-market swap agreement beginning July 1, 2015, partially offset by an increase in volumes sold and (iii) $3.8 million at the MGR assets due to a decrease in volumes sold. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $8.7 million at the DBM complex due to an increase in volumes sold.
The increase in NGLs sales of $265.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , was primarily due to increase s of (i) $255.3 million at the DBM complex due to an increase in average price and volumes sold (see Operating Results–Throughput within this Item 7 ), (ii) $46.3 million at the DJ Basin complex due to an increase in the swap market price and volumes sold and (iii) $15.3 million at the Hilight system due to an increase in average price. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $64.5 million at the MGR assets due to the partial equity treatment of the above-market swap agreement beginning January 1, 2017.
The decrease in NGLs sales of $33.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 , was primarily due to decreases of (i) $35.6 million at the MGR assets due to a decrease in volumes sold and (ii) $8.3 million and $4.8 million at the DJ Basin complex and Hugoton system, respectively, due to the partial equity treatment of the above-market swap agreements beginning July 1, 2015, for the DJ Basin complex and October 1, 2015, for the Hugoton system. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $17.5 million at the DBM complex due to an increase in average price and volumes sold.


92


Other Revenues
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except percentages
 
2017
 
2016
 
Inc/
(Dec)
 
2015
 
Inc/
(Dec)
Other revenues
 
$
20,474

 
$
4,108

 
NM
 
$
5,285

 
(22
)%
                                                                                                                                                                                    
NM-Not Meaningful

For the year ended December 31, 2017 , other revenues increase d by $16.4 million , primarily due to deficiency fees of $8.8 million at the Chipeta complex and $7.2 million at the DBM water systems in 2017.

Equity Income, Net – Affiliates

 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except percentages
 
2017
 
2016
 
Inc/
(Dec)
 
2015
 
Inc/
(Dec)
Equity income, net – affiliates
 
$
85,194

 
$
78,717

 
8
%
 
$
71,251

 
10
%

For the year ended December 31, 2017 , equity income, net – affiliates increase d by $6.5 million , primarily due to an increase in equity income from the Mont Belvieu JV due to product price increases and due to our 14.81% share of an impairment loss determined by the managing partner of Fort Union in 2016.
For the year ended December 31, 2016 , equity income, net – affiliates increase d by $7.5 million , primarily due to our 14.81% share of an impairment loss determined by the managing partner of Fort Union in 2015, and increases in equity income from the TEFR Interests and the Mont Belvieu JV due to increased volumes.

Cost of Product and Operation and Maintenance Expenses
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except percentages
 
2017
 
2016
 
Inc/
(Dec)
 
2015
 
Inc/
(Dec)
NGL purchases (1)
 
$
527,298

 
$
238,660

 
121
%
 
$
251,222

 
(5
)%
Residue purchases (1)
 
357,395

 
231,722

 
54
%
 
253,619

 
(9
)%
Other
 
24,000

 
23,812

 
1
%
 
23,528

 
1
 %
Cost of product
 
908,693

 
494,194

 
84
%
 
528,369

 
(6
)%
Operation and maintenance
 
315,994

 
308,010

 
3
%
 
331,972

 
(7
)%
Total cost of product and operation and maintenance expenses
 
$
1,224,687

 
$
802,204

 
53
%
 
$
860,341

 
(7
)%
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Excludes amounts considered above market with respect to our swap agreements for the MGR assets, DJ Basin complex and Hugoton system (until its divestiture in October 2016) that were recorded as capital contributions in the consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital. See Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .

For the year ended December 31, 2017 , cost of product expense included the effects of commodity price swap agreements attributable to purchases for the MGR assets and DJ Basin complex. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, cost of product expense included the effects of commodity price swap agreements attributable to purchases for the Hugoton system (until its divestiture in October 2016), MGR assets and DJ Basin complex. See Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A and Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .

93


NGL purchases increase d by $288.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to increases of (i) $247.3 million at the DBM complex due to an increase in average price and volumes purchased (see Operating Results–Throughput within this Item 7 ), (ii) $52.8 million at the DJ Basin complex due to an increase in the swap market price and volumes purchased and (iii) $13.1 million at the Hilight system due to an increase in average price. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $34.3 million at the MGR assets due to the partial equity treatment of the above-market swap agreement beginning January 1, 2017.
NGL purchases decrease d by $12.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to decreases of (i) $23.7 million at the MGR assets due to a decrease in volume and average swap price and (ii) $3.2 million at the Chipeta complex and $2.7 million at the Hilight system due to decreases in volumes and average prices. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $19.0 million at the DBM complex due to an increase in volume.
Residue purchases increase d by $125.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to increases of (i) $81.5 million at the DBM complex due to an increase in average price and volumes purchased (see Operating Results–Throughput within this Item 7 ), (ii) $53.2 million at the DJ Basin complex due to an increase in the swap market price and volumes purchased and (iii) $4.8 million at the Hilight system due to an increase in average price. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $15.8 million at the MGR assets due to the partial equity treatment of the above-market swap agreement beginning January 1, 2017.
Residue purchases decrease d by $21.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to decreases of (i) $9.8 million at the DJ Basin complex due to the partial equity treatment of the above-market swap agreement beginning July 1, 2015, partially offset by an increase in volume, (ii) $8.9 million at the Hilight system due to a decrease in volume and average price and (iii) $4.0 million at the MGR assets due to a decrease in volume, partially offset by an increase in average swap price. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $3.4 million at the DBM complex due to an increase in volume.
Other items increase d by $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to changes in affiliate contract terms at the DJ Basin complex in 2017, partially offset by decreases at the DBM complex due to (i) fees paid in 2016 for rerouting volumes due to the DBM outage and (ii) changes in imbalance positions.
Other items increase d by $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to fees paid for rerouting volumes due to the DBM outage, partially offset by changes in imbalance positions, primarily at the DJ Basin and DBM complexes.
Operation and maintenance expense increase d by $8.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to increases of (i) $8.6 million at the DJ Basin complex primarily due to an increase in surface maintenance and plant repairs, (ii) $5.5 million at the DBM complex primarily due to increases in utilities expense and salaries and wages, partially offset by a decrease in surface maintenance and plant repairs, and (iii) $4.5 million due to the Property Exchange in March 2017. These increases were partially offset by decreases of (i) $7.5 million due to the sale of the Hugoton system in October 2016 and (ii) $4.4 million at the Chipeta complex primarily due to a decrease in utilities expense.
Operation and maintenance expense decrease d by $24.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to decreases of (i) $7.3 million at the Springfield system primarily due to decreases in salaries and wages and equipment rental, (ii) $4.6 million at the Chipeta complex primarily due to decreases in utilities expense and surface maintenance and plant repairs, (iii) $4.5 million due to the sale of the Dew and Pinnacle systems in July 2015, (iv) $4.4 million at the DJ Basin complex primarily due to decreases in surface maintenance and plant repairs, contract labor and consulting services, and other operating costs, partially offset by an increase in utilities expense, (v) $3.8 million at the Hugoton system primarily due to a decrease in salaries and wages, and (vi) $2.6 million at the Hilight system primarily due to a decrease in surface maintenance and plant repairs. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $4.0 million at the DBM complex, primarily due to increases in surface maintenance and plant repairs, salaries and wages, and equipment rental, all partially offset by decreases in chemicals and treating services and other operating costs.


94


Other Operating Expenses
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except percentages
 
2017
 
2016
 
Inc/
(Dec)
 
2015
 
Inc/
(Dec)
General and administrative
 
$
47,796

 
$
45,591

 
5
%
 
$
41,319

 
10
 %
Property and other taxes
 
46,818

 
40,145

 
17
%
 
33,288

 
21
 %
Depreciation and amortization
 
290,874

 
272,933

 
7
%
 
272,611

 
 %
Impairments
 
178,374

 
15,535

 
NM

 
515,458

 
(97
)%
Total other operating expenses
 
$
563,862

 
$
374,204

 
51
%
 
$
862,676

 
(57
)%

General and administrative expenses increase d by $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to (i) increases in personnel costs for which we reimbursed Anadarko pursuant to our omnibus agreement and (ii) bad debt expense. These increases were partially offset by decreases in legal and consulting fees.
General and administrative expenses increase d by $4.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to increases in personnel costs for which we reimbursed Anadarko pursuant to our omnibus agreement.
Property and other taxes increase d by $6.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to ad valorem tax increases of $4.2 million at the DJ Basin complex, $1.8 million at the DBJV system and $1.7 million at the DBM complex.
Property and other taxes increase d by $6.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to ad valorem tax increases of $7.2 million at the DJ Basin complex and $1.0 million at the DBM complex, partially offset by ad valorem tax decreases of $1.5 million at the Chipeta complex and $0.9 million due to the sale of the Hugoton system in October 2016.
Depreciation and amortization expense increase d by $17.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to depreciation expense increases of (i) $15.7 million due to the Property Exchange in March 2017, (ii) $11.3 million at the Bison facility due to a change in the estimated property life and (iii) $10.6 million related to capital projects at the DBM complex. These increases were partially offset by decreases of (i) $7.3 million at the Granger complex due to an impairment recorded in the first quarter of 2017 (see impairment expense below), (ii) $5.5 million due to the sale of the Hugoton system in October 2016, (iii) $4.4 million at the MGR assets due to a change in the estimated property life and (iv) $3.4 million at the DJ Basin complex due to a change in estimated salvage values.
Depreciation and amortization increase d by $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to depreciation expense increases of $22.9 million related to capital projects at the DJ Basin, DBM and Granger complexes and the DBJV, Non-Operated Marcellus Interest, and Springfield systems. These increases were partially offset by decreases of (i) $12.1 million at the MGR assets and the Hilight system due to asset impairments recognized in the first and fourth quarters of 2015, respectively, (ii) $7.0 million due to the sale of the Dew and Pinnacle systems in July 2015 and (iii) $3.5 million due to the sale of the Hugoton system in October 2016.
Impairment expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 , included (i) a $158.8 million impairment at the Granger complex, (ii) an $8.2 million impairment at the Hilight system, (iii) a $3.7 million impairment at the Granger straddle plant, (iv) a $3.1 million impairment at the Fort Union system, (v) a $2.0 million impairment of an idle facility in northeast Wyoming and (vi) an impairment related to the cancellation of a pipeline project in West Texas.
Impairment expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 , included (i) a $6.1 million impairment at the Newcastle system and (ii) $9.4 million of impairments primarily related to the cancellation of projects at the DJ Basin complex and the Springfield and DBJV systems, and the abandonment of compressors at the MIGC system.
Impairment expense for the year ended December 31, 2015, included (i) a $280.2 million impairment at the Red Desert complex, (ii) a $220.9 million impairment at the Hilight system and (iii) $14.4 million of impairments primarily related to the abandonment of compressors at the MIGC system and the cancellation of projects at the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest systems and the Brasada, Red Desert and DJ Basin complexes.
For further information on impairment expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, see Note 7—Property, Plant and Equipment in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .


95


Interest Income – Affiliates and Interest Expense
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except percentages
 
2017
 
2016
 
Inc/
(Dec)
 
2015
 
Inc/
(Dec)
Note receivable – Anadarko
 
$
16,900

 
$
16,900

 
 %
 
$
16,900

 
 %
Interest income – affiliates
 
$
16,900

 
$
16,900

 
 %
 
$
16,900

 
 %
Third parties
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term debt
 
$
(142,525
)
 
$
(121,832
)
 
17
 %
 
$
(102,058
)
 
19
 %
Amortization of debt issuance costs and commitment fees
 
(6,616
)
 
(6,398
)
 
3
 %
 
(5,734
)
 
12
 %
Capitalized interest
 
6,826

 
5,562

 
23
 %
 
8,318

 
(33
)%
Affiliates
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (1)
 
(71
)
 
7,747

 
(101
)%
 
(14,398
)
 
(154
)%
Interest expense
 
$
(142,386
)
 
$
(114,921
)
 
24
 %
 
$
(113,872
)
 
1
 %
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
See Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of the Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko.

Interest expense increase d by $27.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to (i) accretion revisions in 2016 recorded as reductions to interest expense for the Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko (see Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K ), (ii) $12.3 million of interest incurred on the 2026 Notes issued in July 2016 and (iii) $8.7 million of interest incurred on the additional 2044 Notes issued in October 2016. These increases were partially offset by an increase in capitalized interest of $1.3 million , primarily due to the construction of Train VI beginning in the fourth quarter of 2016 and the purchase of long-lead items associated with the Mentone plant, partially offset by a decrease due to the completion of Trains IV and V in May 2016 and October 2016, respectively, all located at the DBM complex.
Interest expense increase d by $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to (i) $10.9 million of interest incurred on the 2026 Notes issued in July 2016, (ii) $8.4 million of interest incurred on the 2025 Notes issued in June 2015 and (iii) $2.2 million of interest incurred on the additional 2044 Notes issued in October 2016. These increases were partially offset by accretion revisions recorded as reductions to interest expense for the Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko entered into in March 2015 (see Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K ). Capitalized interest decrease d by $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 , primarily due to the completion of Lancaster Train II in June 2015 (within the DJ Basin complex), partially offset by an increase due to the construction of Trains IV, V and VI at the DBM complex. See Note 12—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .


96


Income Tax (Benefit) Expense
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except percentages
 
2017
 
2016
 
Inc/
(Dec)
 
2015
 
Inc/
(Dec)
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
583,084

 
$
610,666

 
(5
)%
 
$
59,739

 
NM

Income tax (benefit) expense
 
4,866

 
8,372

 
(42
)%
 
45,532

 
(82
)%
Effective tax rate
 
1
%
 
1
%
 


 
76
%
 
 

We are not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, our income apportionable to Texas is subject to Texas margin tax. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the variance from the federal statutory rate, which is zero percent as a non-taxable entity, was primarily due to our share of Texas margin tax. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the variance from the federal statutory rate was primarily due to federal and state taxes on pre-acquisition income attributable to Partnership assets acquired from Anadarko, and our share of Texas margin tax.
Texas House Bill 32, signed into law in June 2015, reduced the Texas margin tax rates by 0.25%. The law became effective January 1, 2016. We were required to include the impact of the law change on our deferred state income taxes in the period enacted. The adjustment, a reduction in deferred state income taxes in the amount of $2.2 million, was recorded in June 2015 and was included in the income tax (benefit) expense for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Income attributable to (i) the Springfield system prior to and including February 2016 and (ii) the DBJV system prior to and including February 2015, was subject to federal and state income tax. Income earned on the Springfield system and the DBJV system for periods subsequent to February 2016 and February 2015, respectively, was only subject to Texas margin tax on income apportionable to Texas.


97


KEY PERFORMANCE METRICS
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except percentages and per-unit amounts
 
2017
 
2016
 
Inc/
(Dec)
 
2015
 
Inc/
(Dec)
Adjusted gross margin for natural gas assets (1)
 
$
1,222,632

 
$
1,194,877

 
2
%
 
$
1,119,555

 
7
%
Adjusted gross margin for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets (2)
 
153,846

 
142,566

 
8
%
 
131,492

 
8
%
Adjusted gross margin (3)
 
1,376,478

 
1,337,443

 
3
%
 
1,251,047

 
7
%
Adjusted gross margin per Mcf for natural gas assets (4)
 
0.94

 
0.83

 
13
%
 
0.74

 
12
%
Adjusted gross margin per Bbl for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets (5)
 
2.10

 
2.11

 
%
 
1.93

 
9
%
Adjusted EBITDA (3)
 
1,060,988

 
1,028,208

 
3
%
 
907,568

 
13
%
Distributable cash flow (3)
 
928,967

 
852,446

 
9
%
 
781,383

 
9
%
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Adjusted gross margin for natural gas assets is calculated as total revenues and other for natural gas assets, less reimbursements for electricity-related expenses recorded as revenue and cost of product for natural gas assets, plus distributions from our equity investments in Fort Union and Rendezvous, and excluding the noncontrolling interest owner’s proportionate share of revenue and cost of product. See the reconciliation of Adjusted gross margin for natural gas assets to its most comparable GAAP measure under How We Evaluate Our Operations—Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures within this Item 7.
(2)  
Adjusted gross margin for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets is calculated as total revenues and other for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets, less reimbursements for electricity-related expenses recorded as revenue and cost of product for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets, plus distributions from our equity investments in White Cliffs, the Mont Belvieu JV, and the TEFR Interests. See the reconciliation of Adjusted gross margin for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets to its most comparable GAAP measure under How We Evaluate Our Operations—Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures within this Item 7.
(3)  
For a reconciliation of Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, see How We Evaluate Our Operations—Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures within this Item 7.
(4)  
Average for period. Calculated as Adjusted gross margin for natural gas assets, divided by total throughput (MMcf/d) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP for natural gas assets.
(5)  
Average for period. Calculated as Adjusted gross margin for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets, divided by total throughput (MBbls/d) for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets.

Adjusted gross margin. Adjusted gross margin increase d by $39.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to (i) an increase in throughput at the DBM complex, (ii) an increase in processed volumes at the DJ Basin complex and (iii) the start-up of the DBM water systems during the second quarter of 2017. These increases were partially offset by decreases from (i) the Property Exchange in March 2017, (ii) lower throughput at the Springfield and Marcellus Interest systems, (iii) the partial equity treatment of the above-market swap agreement at the MGR assets beginning January 1, 2017, and (iv) the sale of the Hugoton system in October 2016.
Adjusted gross margin increase d by $86.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 , primarily due to an increase in volumes at the DJ Basin and DBM complexes and the Haley system. These increases were partially offset by the sale of the Dew and Pinnacle systems in July 2015 and lower volumes at the MGR assets and the Springfield and Hugoton systems.
Adjusted gross margin per Mcf for natural gas assets increase d by $0.11 for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to the Property Exchange in March 2017 and increased throughput at the DBM and DJ Basin complexes.
Adjusted gross margin per Mcf for natural gas assets increase d by $0.09 for the year ended December 31, 2016 , primarily due to increased volumes in the DJ Basin due to the start-up of Lancaster Train II in June 2015 (within the DJ Basin complex) and increased volumes in West Texas due to the start-up of Trains IV and V (both within the DBM complex) in May 2016 and October 2016, respectively. These increases were partially offset by decreased volumes at the Springfield gas gathering system.
Adjusted gross margin per Bbl for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets decrease d by $0.01 for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to (i) lower throughput at the Springfield oil gathering system and (ii) the start-up of the DBM water systems during the second quarter of 2017. These decreases were partially offset by higher distributions received from TEP.
Adjusted gross margin per Bbl for crude oil, NGL and produced water assets increase d by $0.18 for the year ended December 31, 2016 , primarily due to higher distributions received from the Mont Belvieu JV and White Cliffs.

98


Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA increase d by $32.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to a $444.1 million increase in total revenues and other, a $13.6 million increase in business interruption proceeds and a $7.0 million increase in distributions from equity investments. These amounts were partially offset by a $414.5 million increase in cost of product (net of lower of cost or market inventory adjustments), an $8.0 million increase in operation and maintenance expenses, a $6.7 million increase in property and other tax expense, and a $2.8 million increase in general and administrative expenses excluding non-cash equity-based compensation expense.
Adjusted EBITDA increase d by $120.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 , primarily due to a $52.2 million increase in total revenues and other, a $33.9 million decrease in cost of product (net of lower of cost or market inventory adjustments), a $24.0 million decrease in operation and maintenance expenses, $16.3 million in business interruption proceeds, and a $5.1 million increase in distributions from equity investments. These amounts were partially offset by a $6.9 million increase in property and other tax expense, a $3.1 million increase in general and administrative expenses excluding non-cash equity-based compensation expense, and a $0.9 million increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling interest.

Distributable cash flow. Distributable cash flow increase d by $76.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to a $38.3 million decrease in Series A Preferred unit distributions, a $32.8 million increase in Adjusted EBITDA, a $13.9 million decrease in cash paid for maintenance capital expenditures, and a $12.7 million increase in the above-market component of the swap agreements with Anadarko. These amounts were partially offset by a $20.9 million increase in net cash paid for interest expense.
Distributable cash flow increase d by $71.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 , primarily due to a $120.6 million increase in Adjusted EBITDA and a $27.4 million increase in the above-market component of the swap agreements with Anadarko. These amounts were partially offset by distributions of $45.8 million on the Series A Preferred units issued in 2016, a $20.4 million increase in net cash paid for interest expense and a $9.7 million increase in cash paid for maintenance capital expenditures.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our primary cash requirements are for acquisitions and capital expenditures, debt service, customary operating expenses, quarterly distributions to our limited partners and general partner, and distributions to our noncontrolling interest owner. Our sources of liquidity as of December 31, 2017 , included cash and cash equivalents, cash flows generated from operations, interest income on our $260.0 million note receivable from Anadarko, available borrowing capacity under the RCF, and issuances of additional equity or debt securities. We believe that cash flows generated from these sources will be sufficient to satisfy our short-term working capital requirements and long-term maintenance and expansion capital expenditure requirements. The amount of future distributions to unitholders will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors, including the extension of our commodity price swap agreements, and will be determined by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis. Due to our cash distribution policy, we expect to rely on external financing sources, including equity and debt issuances, to fund expansion capital expenditures and future acquisitions. However, to limit interest expense, we may use operating cash flows to fund expansion capital expenditures or acquisitions, which could result in subsequent borrowings under the RCF to pay distributions or fund other short-term working capital requirements.
During the second quarter of 2017, we reached a settlement with insurers related to the insurance claim filed for the incident at the DBM complex and final proceeds were received. Recoveries from the business interruption insurance claim related to the DBM outage were recognized as income when cash proceeds were received from insurers. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , we received $52.9 million in cash proceeds from insurers, including $29.9 million for business interruption insurance claims and $23.0 million for property insurance claims (see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K ).

99


Our partnership agreement requires that we distribute all of our available cash (as defined in the partnership agreement) to unitholders of record on the applicable record date within 45 days of the end of each quarter. We have made cash distributions to our unitholders each quarter since our IPO and have increased our quarterly distribution each quarter since the second quarter of 2009. The Board of Directors declared a cash distribution to our unitholders for the fourth quarter of 2017 of $0.920 per unit, or $216.6 million in aggregate, including incentive distributions, but excluding distributions on Class C units. The cash distribution was paid on February 13, 2018 , to unitholders of record at the close of business on February 1, 2018 . In connection with the closing of the DBM acquisition in November 2014, we issued Class C units that will receive distributions in the form of additional Class C units until March 1, 2020, unless earlier converted (see Note 3—Partnership Distributions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K ). The Class C unit distribution, if paid in cash, would have been $12.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2017 .
Management continuously monitors our leverage position and coordinates our capital expenditure program, quarterly distributions and acquisition strategy with our expected cash flows and projected debt-repayment schedule. We will continue to evaluate funding alternatives, including additional borrowings and the issuance of debt or equity securities, to secure funds as needed or to refinance outstanding debt balances with longer term notes. To facilitate potential debt or equity securities offerings, we have the ability to sell securities under our shelf registration statements. Our ability to generate cash flows is subject to a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control. Read Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K .

Working capital . As of December 31, 2017 , we had a $170.3 million working capital deficit, which we define as the amount by which current liabilities exceed current assets. Working capital is an indication of our liquidity and potential need for short-term funding. Our working capital requirements are driven by changes in accounts receivable and accounts payable and factors such as credit extended to, and the timing of collections from, our customers, and the level and timing of our spending for maintenance and expansion activity. Our working capital deficit as of December 31, 2017 , was primarily due to the costs incurred related to continued construction and expansion at the DBM and DJ Basin complexes and the DBJV system. As of December 31, 2017 , we had $825.4 million available for borrowing under the RCF. See Note 12—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .

Capital expenditures . Our business is capital intensive, requiring significant investment to maintain and improve existing facilities or develop new midstream infrastructure. We categorize capital expenditures as either of the following:
 
maintenance capital expenditures, which include those expenditures required to maintain the existing operating capacity and service capability of our assets, such as to replace system components and equipment that have been subject to significant use over time, become obsolete or reached the end of their useful lives, to remain in compliance with regulatory or legal requirements or to complete additional well connections to maintain existing system throughput and related cash flows; or

expansion capital expenditures, which include expenditures to construct new midstream infrastructure and those expenditures incurred to extend the useful lives of our assets, reduce costs, increase revenues or increase system throughput or capacity from current levels, including well connections that increase existing system throughput.


100


Capital expenditures in the consolidated statements of cash flows reflect capital expenditures on a cash basis, when payments are made. Capital incurred is presented on an accrual basis. Capital expenditures as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows and capital incurred were as follows:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Acquisitions
 
$
159,208

 
$
716,465

 
$
14,417

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expansion capital expenditures
 
$
623,674

 
$
410,221

 
$
583,282

Maintenance capital expenditures
 
49,964

 
63,637

 
54,221

Total capital expenditures (1) (2)
 
$
673,638

 
$
473,858

 
$
637,503

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital incurred (2)
 
$
798,694

 
$
491,349

 
$
566,045

                                                                                                                                                                                     
(1)  
Capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , are presented net of $1.4 million , $6.1 million and $0.5 million , respectively, of contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates.
(2)  
For the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , included $6.8 million , $5.6 million and $8.3 million , respectively, of capitalized interest.

Acquisitions during 2017 included the Additional DBJV System Interest and equipment purchases from Anadarko. Acquisitions during 2016 included Springfield and equipment purchases from Anadarko. Acquisitions during 2015 included equipment purchases from Anadarko and the post-closing purchase price adjustments related to the DBM acquisition. See Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures and Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, increase d by $199.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 . Expansion capital expenditures increase d by $213.5 million (including a $1.3 million increase in capitalized interest) for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to (i) increases of $176.5 million at the DBJV system and $70.2 million at the DJ Basin complex, both due to pipe and compression projects, and (ii) an increase of $50.2 million due to the construction of the DBM water systems. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $77.5 million at the DBM complex. Maintenance capital expenditures decrease d by $13.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , primarily due to the Property Exchange in March 2017 and decreases at the DBM complex due to repairs made in 2016 as a result of the DBM outage. These decreases were partially offset by increases at the Hilight and Haley systems.
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, decrease d by $163.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Expansion capital expenditures decrease d by $173.1 million (including a $2.8 million decrease in capitalized interest) for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to a decrease of $188.8 million at the DJ Basin complex as a result of decreased activity in 2016. In addition, there were decreases of $35.7 million at the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest systems, $30.0 million at the Springfield system, $18.4 million at the Hilight system, $13.5 million at the Haley system, and $9.3 million at the Marcellus Interest systems. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $102.8 million due to continued construction at the DBM complex and an increase of $24.5 million at the DBJV system. Maintenance capital expenditures increase d by $9.4 million , primarily due to an increase at the DBM complex, partially offset by decreased expenditures at the DJ Basin complex and the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest and Springfield systems.
For the year ending December 31, 2018, we estimate that our total capital expenditures, including our 75% share of Chipeta’s capital expenditures and excluding acquisitions, will be between $1.0 billion to $1.1 billion and our maintenance capital expenditures will be between $80.0 million to $90.0 million.


101


Historical cash flow . The following table and discussion present a summary of our net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities, investing activities and financing activities:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Net cash provided by (used in):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating activities
 
$
901,495

 
$
917,585

 
$
785,645

Investing activities
 
(763,604
)
 
(1,105,534
)
 
(500,277
)
Financing activities
 
(417,002
)
 
447,841

 
(254,389
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 
$
(279,111
)
 
$
259,892

 
$
30,979


Operating Activities . Net cash provided by operating activities decrease d for the year ended December 31, 2017 , and increased for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to the impact of changes in working capital items. Refer to Operating Results within this Item 7 for a discussion of our results of operations as compared to the prior periods.

Investing Activities . Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 , included the following:

$673.6 million of capital expenditures, net of $1.4 million of contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates, primarily related to construction and expansion at the DBJV system and the DBM and DJ Basin complexes and the construction of the DBM water systems;

$155.3 million of cash consideration paid as part of the Property Exchange;

$23.3 million of net proceeds from the sale of the Helper and Clawson systems in Utah;

$23.1 million of distributions from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings;

$23.0 million of proceeds from property insurance claims attributable to the DBM outage; and

$3.9 million of cash paid for equipment purchases from Anadarko.

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 , included the following:

$712.5 million of cash paid for the acquisition of Springfield;

$473.9 million of capital expenditures, net of $6.1 million of contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates, primarily related to plant construction and expansion at the DBM and DJ Basin complexes and the DBJV system;

$45.1 million of net proceeds from the sale of the Hugoton system in Southwest Kansas and Oklahoma;

$21.2 million of distributions from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings;

$17.5 million of proceeds from property insurance claims attributable to the DBM outage; and

$4.0 million of cash paid for equipment purchases from Anadarko.


102


Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015, included the following:

$637.5 million of capital expenditures, net of $0.5 million of contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates, primarily related to the construction of Train IV at the DBM complex, continued construction of Lancaster Train II (within the DJ Basin complex) and expansion at the DBJV system;

$145.6 million of net proceeds from the sale of the Dew and Pinnacle systems in East Texas;

$16.2 million of distributions from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings;

$11.4 million of cash contributed to equity investments, primarily related to expansion projects at White Cliffs, TEP and FRP;

$10.9 million of cash paid for equipment purchases from Anadarko; and

$3.5 million of cash paid for post-closing purchase price adjustments related to the DBM acquisition.

Financing Activities . Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 , included the following:

$801.3 million of distributions paid to our unitholders;

$370.0 million of borrowings under the RCF, which were used for general partnership purposes, including funding of capital expenditures;

$58.6 million of capital contributions from Anadarko related to the above-market component of swap agreements;

$37.3 million of cash paid to Anadarko for the settlement of the Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko; and

$13.6 million of distributions paid to the noncontrolling interest owner of Chipeta.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 , included the following:

$900.0 million of repayments of outstanding borrowings under the RCF;

$671.9 million of distributions paid to our unitholders;

$599.3 million of borrowings under the RCF, net of extension costs, which were used to fund a portion of the Springfield acquisition and for general partnership purposes, including funding capital expenditures;

$494.6 million of net proceeds from the 2026 Notes offering in July 2016, after underwriting and original issue discounts and offering costs, all of which was used to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the RCF;

$440.0 million of net proceeds from the issuance of 14,030,611 Series A Preferred units in March 2016, all of which was used to fund a portion of the acquisition of Springfield;

$246.9 million of net proceeds from the issuance of 7,892,220 Series A Preferred units in April 2016, all of which was used to pay down amounts borrowed under the RCF in connection with the acquisition of Springfield;

$203.3 million of net proceeds from the offering of the additional 2044 Notes in October 2016, after underwriting discounts and original issue premium and offering costs, all of which was used to repay amounts then outstanding under the RCF and for general partnership purposes, including capital expenditures;


103


$45.8 million of capital contributions from Anadarko related to the above-market component of swap agreements;

$25.0 million of net proceeds from the sale of common units to WGP, all of which was used to fund a portion of the acquisition of Springfield;

$23.5 million of net distributions paid to Anadarko representing pre-acquisition intercompany transactions attributable to Springfield; and

$13.8 million of distributions paid to the noncontrolling interest owner of Chipeta.

Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015, included the following:

$610.0 million of repayments of outstanding borrowings under the RCF;

$545.1 million of distributions paid to our unitholders;

$489.6 million of net proceeds from the 2025 Notes offering in June 2015, after underwriting and original issue discounts and offering costs, all of which was used to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the RCF;

$400.0 million of borrowings under the RCF, which were used for general partnership purposes, including funding capital expenditures;

$57.4 million of net proceeds from sales of common units under the registration statement filed with the SEC in August 2014 authorizing the issuance of up to an aggregate of $500.0 million of our common units. Net proceeds were used for general partnership purposes, including funding capital expenditures;

$49.8 million of net distributions paid to Anadarko representing pre-acquisition intercompany transactions attributable to Springfield and DBJV;

$18.4 million of capital contribution from Anadarko related to the above-market component of swap agreements; and

$12.2 million of distributions paid to the noncontrolling interest owner of Chipeta.

Debt and credit facility. At December 31, 2017 , our debt consisted of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2021 Notes, $670.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Notes, $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2018 Notes, $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2044 Notes, $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2025 Notes, $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2026 Notes and $370.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the RCF. As of December 31, 2017 , the carrying value of our outstanding debt was $3.5 billion . See Note 12—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .


104


Senior Notes . The 2018 Notes, which are due in August 2018, were classified as long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017 , as we have the ability and intent to refinance these obligations using long-term debt.
In October 2016, we issued an additional $200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2044 Notes at a price to the public of 102.776% of the face amount plus accrued interest from October 1, 2016 to the settlement date. These notes were offered as additional notes under the indenture governing the 2044 Notes issued in March 2014 and are treated as a single class of securities with the 2044 Notes under such indenture. Including the effects of (i) the issuance premium for the October 2016 offering of the 2044 Notes, (ii) the issuance discount for the March 2014 offering of the 2044 Notes and (iii) the underwriting discounts, the effective interest rate of the 2044 Notes is 5.530%. Proceeds (net of underwriting discount of $1.8 million and debt issuance costs, and excluding accrued interest from October 1, 2016 to the settlement date) were used to repay amounts then outstanding under the RCF. The remaining proceeds were used for general partnership purposes, including capital expenditures.
The 2026 Notes issued in July 2016 were offered at a price to the public of 99.796% of the face amount. Including the effects of the issuance and underwriting discounts, the effective interest rate of the 2026 Notes is 4.787%. Proceeds (net of underwriting discount of $3.1 million, original issue discount and debt issuance costs) were used to repay a portion of the amount outstanding under the RCF.
At December 31, 2017 , we were in compliance with all covenants under the indentures governing our outstanding notes.

Revolving credit facility. The $1.2 billion RCF bears interest at LIBOR, plus applicable margins ranging from 0.975% to 1.45% , or an alternate base rate equal to the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% , or (c) LIBOR plus 1% , in each case plus applicable margins currently ranging from zero to 0.45% , based upon our senior unsecured debt rating. In December 2016, the RCF was amended to extend the maturity date from February 2019 to February 2020. We are required to pay a quarterly facility fee currently ranging from 0.15% to 0.30% of the commitment amount (whether used or unused), based upon our senior unsecured debt rating. As of December 31, 2017 , we had $370.0 million of outstanding RCF borrowings and $4.6 million in outstanding letters of credit, resulting in $825.4 million available for borrowing under the RCF. At December 31, 2017 , the interest rate on the RCF was 2.87% and the facility fee rate was 0.20% .
The RCF contains certain covenants that limit, among other things, our ability, and that of certain of our subsidiaries, to incur additional indebtedness, grant certain liens, merge, consolidate or allow any material change in the character of our business, enter into certain affiliate transactions and use proceeds other than for partnership purposes. The RCF also contains various customary covenants, customary events of default and a maximum consolidated leverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter (which is defined as the ratio of consolidated indebtedness as of the last day of a fiscal quarter to Consolidated Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization for the most recent four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on such day) of 5.0 to 1.0, or a consolidated leverage ratio of 5.5 to 1.0 with respect to quarters ending in the 270-day period immediately following certain acquisitions. At December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all covenants under the RCF. In February 2018, the RCF was amended to extend the maturity date from February 2020 to February 2023 and expand borrowing capacity to $1.5 billion.
All notes and obligations under the RCF are recourse to our general partner. Our general partner is indemnified by wholly owned subsidiaries of Anadarko against any claims made against the general partner for our long-term debt and/or borrowings under the RCF.

Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko. Prior to our agreement with Anadarko to settle the deferred purchase price obligation early, the consideration that would have been paid for the March 2015 acquisition of DBJV from Anadarko consisted of a cash payment to Anadarko due on March 31, 2020. The cash payment would have been equal to (a) eight multiplied by the average of our share of Net Earnings (as defined below) of DBJV for the calendar years 2018 and 2019, less (b) our share of all capital expenditures incurred for DBJV between March 1, 2015, and February 29, 2020. Net Earnings was defined as all revenues less cost of product, operating expenses and property taxes, in each case attributable to DBJV on an accrual basis. In May 2017, we reached an agreement with Anadarko to settle this obligation with a cash payment to Anadarko of $37.3 million, which was equal to the estimated net present value of the obligation at March 31, 2017. See Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .


105


Securities . We may issue an indeterminate amount of common units and various debt securities under our effective shelf registration statement on file with the SEC. We may also issue common units under the $500.0 million COP, in amounts, at prices and on terms to be determined by market conditions and other factors at the time of offering. As of December 31, 2017, we had issued no common units under the registration statement associated with the $500.0 million COP.

Credit risk . We bear credit risk represented by our exposure to non-payment or non-performance by our counterparties, including Anadarko, financial institutions, customers and other parties. Generally, non-payment or non-performance results from a customer’s inability to satisfy payables to us for services rendered or volumes owed pursuant to gas imbalance agreements. We examine and monitor the creditworthiness of third-party customers and may establish credit limits for third-party customers. A substantial portion of our throughput, however, comes from producers, including Anadarko, that have investment-grade ratings.
We do not, however, maintain a credit limit with respect to Anadarko. Consequently, we are subject to the risk of non-payment or late payment by Anadarko for gathering, processing, transportation and disposal fees and for proceeds from the sale of residue, NGLs and condensate to Anadarko.
We expect our exposure to concentrated risk of non-payment or non-performance to continue for as long as we remain substantially dependent on Anadarko for our revenues. Additionally, we are exposed to credit risk on the note receivable from Anadarko. We are also party to agreements with Anadarko under which Anadarko is required to indemnify us for certain environmental claims, losses arising from rights-of-way claims, failures to obtain required consents or governmental permits and income taxes with respect to the assets acquired from Anadarko. Finally, we have entered into various commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko in order to reduce our exposure to a majority of the commodity price risk inherent in our percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts, and are subject to performance risk thereunder. See Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .
Our ability to make distributions to our unitholders may be adversely impacted if Anadarko becomes unable to perform under the terms of our gathering, processing, transportation and disposal agreements, our natural gas and NGL purchase agreements, Anadarko’s note payable to us, our omnibus agreement, the services and secondment agreement, the contribution agreements or the commodity price swap agreements.


106


CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following is a summary of our contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2017 . The table below excludes amounts classified as current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, other than the current portions of the categories listed within the table. It is expected that the majority of the excluded current liabilities will be paid in cash in 2018 .
 
 
Obligations by Period
thousands
 
2018
 
2019
 
2020
 
2021
 
2022
 
Thereafter
 
Total
Long-term debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Principal
 
$
350,000

 
$

 
$
370,000

 
$
500,000

 
$
670,000

 
$
1,600,000

 
$
3,490,000

Interest
 
145,793

 
140,141

 
131,115

 
112,727

 
102,327

 
832,319

 
1,464,422

Asset retirement obligations
 
2,304

 

 
2,554

 

 

 
140,840

 
145,698

Capital expenditures
 
212,463

 

 

 

 

 

 
212,463

Credit facility fees
 
2,400

 
2,400

 
375

 

 

 

 
5,175

Environmental obligations
 
833

 
323

 
323

 
141

 
141

 
57

 
1,818

Operating leases
 
8,402

 
7,506

 
1,615

 
460

 
467

 
2,021

 
20,471

Total
 
$
722,195

 
$
150,370

 
$
505,982

 
$
613,328

 
$
772,935

 
$
2,575,237

 
$
5,340,047


Asset retirement obligations. When assets are acquired or constructed, the initial estimated asset retirement obligation is recognized in an amount equal to the net present value of the settlement obligation, with an associated increase in properties and equipment. Revisions in estimated asset retirement obligations may result from changes in estimated inflation rates, discount rates, asset retirement costs and the estimated timing of settlement. For additional information, see Note 11—Asset Retirement Obligations in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Capital expenditures. Included in this amount are capital obligations related to our expansion projects. We have other planned capital and investment projects that are discretionary in nature, with no substantial contractual obligations made in advance of the actual expenditures. See Note 13—Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Credit facility fees. For additional information on credit facility fees required under the RCF, see Note 12—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Environmental obligations. We are subject to various environmental remediation obligations arising from federal, state and local regulations regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal and other environmental matters. We regularly monitor the remediation and reclamation process and the liabilities recorded and believe that the amounts reflected in our recorded environmental obligations are adequate to fund remedial actions to comply with present laws and regulations. For additional information on environmental obligations, see Note 13—Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Operating leases. Anadarko, on our behalf, has entered into lease arrangements for corporate offices, shared field offices and equipment supporting our operations, for which it charges us rent. The amounts above represent existing contractual operating lease obligations that may be assigned or otherwise charged to us pursuant to the reimbursement provisions of the omnibus agreement. See Note 13—Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

For additional information on contracts, obligations and arrangements we enter into from time to time, see Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates and Note 13—Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


107


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires our management to make informed judgments and estimates that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and affect the amounts of revenues and expenses recognized during the periods reported. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates, including those related to the determination of property, plant and equipment, asset retirement obligations, litigation, environmental liabilities, income taxes and fair values. Although these estimates are based on management’s best available knowledge of current and expected future events, changes in facts and circumstances or discovery of new information may result in revised estimates, and actual results may differ from these estimates. Management considers the following to be its most critical accounting estimates that involve judgment and discusses the selection and development of these estimates with the Audit Committee of our general partner. For additional information concerning our accounting policies, see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Impairments of tangible assets. Property, plant and equipment are generally stated at the lower of historical cost less accumulated depreciation or fair value, if impaired. Because acquisitions of assets from Anadarko are transfers of net assets between entities under common control, the Partnership assets acquired by us from Anadarko are initially recorded at Anadarko’s historic carrying value. Assets acquired in a business combination or non-monetary exchange with a third party are initially recorded at fair value. Property, plant and equipment balances are evaluated for potential impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable from expected undiscounted cash flows from the use and eventual disposition of an asset. If the carrying amount of the asset is not expected to be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows, an impairment may be recognized. Any impairment is measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value.
In assessing long-lived assets for impairments, our management evaluates changes in our business and economic conditions and their implications for recoverability of the assets’ carrying amounts. Since a significant portion of our revenues arises from gathering, processing and transporting production from Anadarko-operated properties, significant downward revisions in reserve estimates or changes in future development plans by Anadarko, to the extent they affect our operations, may necessitate assessment of the carrying amount of our affected assets for recoverability. Such assessment requires application of judgment regarding the use and ultimate disposition of the asset, long-range revenue and expense estimates, global and regional economic conditions, including commodity prices and drilling activity by our customers, as well as other factors affecting estimated future net cash flows. The measure of impairments to be recognized, if any, depends upon management’s estimate of the asset’s fair value, which may be determined based on the estimates of future net cash flows or values at which similar assets were transferred in the market in recent transactions, if such data is available. See Note 7—Property, Plant and Equipment in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a description of impairments recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .


108


Impairments of goodwill. Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price of a business acquired exceeds the fair market value of the tangible and separately measurable intangible net assets. In addition, our goodwill represents the allocated portion of Anadarko’s midstream goodwill attributed to the Partnership assets acquired from Anadarko. The carrying value of Anadarko’s midstream goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid to a third-party entity over the estimated fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed by Anadarko. Accordingly, our allocated goodwill balance does not represent, and in some cases is significantly different from, the difference between the consideration paid by us for acquisitions from Anadarko and the fair value of such net assets on their respective acquisition dates.
We evaluate whether goodwill has been impaired annually as of October 1, unless facts and circumstances make it necessary to test more frequently. Accounting standards require that goodwill be assessed for impairment at the reporting unit level. Management has determined that we have one operating segment and two reporting units: (i) gathering and processing and (ii) transportation. The carrying value of goodwill as of December 31, 2017 , was $411.4 million for the gathering and processing reporting unit and $4.8 million for the transportation reporting unit. We allocated $1.6 million of goodwill to our divestiture of the Hugoton system upon its sale in October 2016 and $5.1 million of goodwill to our divestiture of the Dew and Pinnacle systems upon their sale in July 2015. See Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
We first assess whether an impairment of goodwill is necessary through a qualitative assessment to determine the likelihood of whether the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. If we conclude it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the related carrying amount, then goodwill is not impaired and further testing is not necessary. If the qualitative assessment indicates the fair value of the reporting unit may be less than its carrying amount, we would compare the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to which goodwill is assigned to the carrying amount of the associated net assets, including goodwill, and determine whether an impairment is necessary.
When evaluating whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, relevant events and circumstances are assessed, including the following:

significant changes in our unit price;
significant declines in commodity prices;
significant increases in operating and capital costs;
impairments recognized;
acquisitions and disposals of assets;
changes in throughput; and
significant declines in trading multiples for our peers.

In this manner, estimating the fair value of our reporting units was not necessary based on the qualitative evaluation as of October 1, 2017 . Qualitative factors were also assessed in the fourth quarter of 2017 to review any changes in circumstances subsequent to the annual test, including changes in commodity prices, and we concluded that estimating the fair value of our reporting units was not necessary at that time either. However, fair-value estimates of our reporting units may be required for goodwill impairment testing in the future, and if the carrying amount of a reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds its fair value, goodwill is written down to the implied fair value through a charge to operating expense. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 8—Goodwill and Intangibles in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for more information.


109


Because quoted market prices for our reporting units are not available, management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of reporting units for purposes of performing the goodwill impairment test, when necessary. Management uses a variety of information to make these fair-value estimates, including market multiples of EBITDA. Specifically, our management estimates fair value by applying an estimated multiple to projected EBITDA. Management considers observable transactions in the market, as well as trading multiples for peers, to determine an appropriate multiple to apply against our projected EBITDA. A lower fair-value estimate in the future for any of our reporting units could result in a goodwill impairment. Factors that could trigger a lower fair-value estimate include sustained price declines, throughput declines, cost increases, regulatory or political environment changes, and other changes in market conditions such as decreased prices in market-based transactions for similar assets. Based on our most recent goodwill impairment test, we concluded, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded the carrying value of the reporting unit. Therefore, no goodwill impairment was indicated, and no goodwill impairment has been recognized in our consolidated financial statements.

Impairments of intangible assets. Our intangible asset balance as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , primarily represents the fair value, net of amortization, of (i) contracts we assumed in connection with the Platte Valley acquisition in February 2011, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 50 years, (ii) interconnect agreements at Chipeta entered into in November 2012, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 10 years, and (iii) contracts we assumed in connection with the DBM acquisition in November 2014, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 30 years. See Note 8—Goodwill and Intangibles in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Management assesses intangible assets for impairment together with the related underlying long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairments exist when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds estimates of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. When alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset are under consideration, estimates of future undiscounted cash flows take into account possible outcomes and probabilities of their occurrence. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable based on the estimated future undiscounted cash flows, the impairment loss is measured as the excess of the asset’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value, such that the asset’s carrying amount is adjusted to its estimated fair value with an offsetting charge to impairment expense. No intangible asset impairment has been recognized in connection with these assets.

Fair value. Among other things, management estimates fair value (i) of long-lived assets for impairment testing, (ii) of reporting units for goodwill impairment testing when necessary, (iii) of assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination or exchanged in non-monetary transactions, and (iv) for the initial measurement of asset retirement obligations. When our management is required to measure fair value and there is not a market-observable price for the asset or liability or a similar asset or liability, management utilizes the cost, income, or market multiples valuation approach depending on the quality of information available to support management’s assumptions. The cost approach is based on management’s best estimate of the current asset replacement cost. The income approach uses management’s best assumptions regarding expectations of projected cash flows, and discounts the expected cash flows using a commensurate risk adjusted discount rate. Such evaluations involve a significant amount of judgment, since the results are based on expected future events or conditions, such as sales prices, estimates of future throughput, capital and operating costs and the timing thereof, economic and regulatory climates and other factors. A multiples approach uses management’s best assumptions regarding expectations of projected EBITDA and the multiple of that EBITDA that a buyer would pay to acquire an asset. Management’s estimates of future net cash flows and EBITDA are inherently imprecise because they reflect management’s expectation of future conditions that are often outside of management’s control. However, assumptions used reflect a market participant’s view of long-term prices, costs and other factors, and are consistent with assumptions used in our business plans and investment decisions. See Note 1-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


110


OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases and standby letters of credit. The information pertaining to operating leases and our standby letters of credit required for this item is provided under Note 13—Commitments and Contingencies and Note 12—Debt and Interest Expense , respectively, included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .

RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS

See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Commodity price risk. Certain of our processing services are provided under percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole agreements in which Anadarko is typically responsible for the marketing of the natural gas, condensate and NGLs. Under percent-of-proceeds agreements, we receive a specified percentage of the net proceeds from the sale of residue and/or NGLs. Under keep-whole agreements, we keep 100% of the NGLs produced and the processed natural gas, or value of the natural gas, is returned to the producer, and since some of the gas is used and removed during processing, we compensate the producer for the amount of gas used and removed in processing by supplying additional gas or by paying an agreed-upon value for the gas used.
To mitigate a majority of our exposure to the commodity price risk inherent in our percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts, we currently have in place commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko covering activity at the DJ Basin complex and the MGR assets. On December 20, 2017 , we renewed these commodity price swap agreements through December 31, 2018, with an effective date of January 1, 2018. See Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II , Item 8 of this Form 10-K .
We consider our exposure to commodity price risk associated with the above-described arrangements to be minimal given the existence of the commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko and the relatively small amount of our operating income (loss) that is impacted by changes in market prices. Accordingly, we do not expect that a 10% increase or decrease in commodity prices would have a material impact on our operating income (loss), financial condition or cash flows for the next twelve months, excluding the effect of imbalances described below.
We bear a limited degree of commodity price risk with respect to settlement of our natural gas imbalances that arise from differences in gas volumes received into our systems and gas volumes delivered by us to customers, as well as instances where our actual liquids recovery or fuel usage varies from the contractually stipulated amounts. Natural gas volumes owed to or by us that are subject to monthly cash settlement are valued according to the terms of the contract as of the balance sheet dates, and generally reflect market index prices. Other natural gas volumes owed to or by us are valued at our weighted-average cost of natural gas as of the balance sheet dates and are settled in-kind. Our exposure to the impact of changes in commodity prices on outstanding imbalances depends on the timing of settlement of the imbalances.

Interest rate risk. The FOMC raised its target range for the federal funds rate three separate times during 2017. These increases, and any future increases, in the federal funds rate will ultimately result in an increase in our financing costs. As of December 31, 2017 , we had $370.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the RCF (which bears interest at a rate based on LIBOR or, at our option, an alternative base rate). A 10% change in LIBOR would have resulted in a nominal change in net income (loss) and the fair value of the borrowings under the RCF at December 31, 2017 .
We may incur additional variable-rate debt in the future, either under the RCF or other financing sources, including commercial bank borrowings or debt issuances.

111

Table of Contents

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


112

Table of Contents

WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT

Management of Western Gas Partners, LP’s (the “Partnership”) general partner prepared, and is responsible for, the consolidated financial statements and the other information appearing in this annual report. The consolidated financial statements present fairly the Partnership’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). In preparing its consolidated financial statements, the Partnership includes amounts that are based on estimates and judgments that Management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. The Partnership’s consolidated financial statements have been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm appointed by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Management has made available to KPMG LLP all of the Partnership’s financial records and related data, as well as the minutes of the Directors’ meetings.

MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Partnership’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 . This assessment was based on criteria established in the Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on our assessment using the COSO criteria, we concluded the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017 .
KPMG LLP, the Partnership’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 .

/s/ Benjamin M. Fink
 
Benjamin M. Fink
President and Chief Executive Officer
Western Gas Holdings, LLC
(as general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP)
 
 
 
/s/ Jaime R. Casas
 
Jaime R. Casas
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Western Gas Holdings, LLC
(as general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP)
 

February 16, 2018


113

Table of Contents

WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Unitholders
Western Gas Holdings, LLC (as general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP):

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Western Gas Partners, LP’s (the Partnership) and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 , based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission . In our opinion, the Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 , based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of Western Gas Partners, LP and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the related consolidated statements of operations, equity and partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017 , and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 16, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

Western Gas Partners, LP’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
    
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Houston, Texas
February 16, 2018

114


WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Unitholders and Board of Directors
Western Gas Holdings, LLC (as general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP):

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Western Gas Partners, LP (the Partnership) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the related consolidated statements of operations, equity and partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017 , and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Partnership as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017 , in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 , based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 16, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Partnership’s auditor since 2007.
Houston, Texas
February 16, 2018


115


WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except per-unit amounts
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues and other – affiliates
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gathering, processing, transportation and disposal
 
$
656,795

 
$
750,087

 
$
772,361

Natural gas and natural gas liquids sales
 
692,447

 
478,145

 
447,106

Other
 
16,076

 

 
1,172

Total revenues and other – affiliates
 
1,365,318

 
1,228,232

 
1,220,639

Revenues and other – third parties
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gathering, processing, transportation and disposal
 
581,154

 
477,762

 
356,477

Natural gas and natural gas liquids sales
 
297,486

 
94,168

 
170,843

Other
 
4,398

 
4,108

 
4,113

Total revenues and other – third parties
 
883,038

 
576,038

 
531,433

Total revenues and other
 
2,248,356

 
1,804,270

 
1,752,072

Equity income, net – affiliates
 
85,194

 
78,717

 
71,251

Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of product (1)
 
908,693

 
494,194

 
528,369

Operation and maintenance (1)
 
315,994

 
308,010

 
331,972

General and administrative (1)
 
47,796

 
45,591

 
41,319

Property and other taxes
 
46,818

 
40,145

 
33,288

Depreciation and amortization
 
290,874

 
272,933

 
272,611

Impairments
 
178,374

 
15,535

 
515,458

Total operating expenses
 
1,788,549

 
1,176,408

 
1,723,017

Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net   (2)
 
132,388

 
(14,641
)
 
57,024

Proceeds from business interruption insurance claims
 
29,882

 
16,270

 

Operating income (loss)
 
707,271

 
708,208

 
157,330

Interest income – affiliates
 
16,900

 
16,900

 
16,900

Interest expense (3)
 
(142,386
)
 
(114,921
)
 
(113,872
)
Other income (expense), net
 
1,299

 
479

 
(619
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
583,084

 
610,666

 
59,739

Income tax (benefit) expense
 
4,866

 
8,372

 
45,532

Net income (loss)
 
578,218

 
602,294

 
14,207

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
10,735

 
10,963

 
10,101

Net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP
 
$
567,483

 
$
591,331

 
$
4,106

Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP
 
$
567,483

 
$
591,331

 
$
4,106

Pre-acquisition net (income) loss allocated to Anadarko
 

 
(11,326
)
 
(79,386
)
Series A Preferred units interest in net (income) loss
 
(42,373
)
 
(76,893
)
 

General partner interest in net (income) loss (4)
 
(303,835
)
 
(236,561
)
 
(180,996
)
Common and Class C limited partners’ interest in net income (loss) (4)
 
221,275

 
266,551

 
(256,276
)
Net income (loss) per common unit – basic and diluted (5)
 
$
1.30

 
$
1.74

 
$
(1.95
)
 
                                                                                                                                                                                         
(1)  
Cost of product includes product purchases from Anadarko (as defined in Note 1 ) of $86.0 million , $80.5 million and $167.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. Operation and maintenance includes charges from Anadarko of $72.5 million , $72.3 million and $77.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. General and administrative includes charges from Anadarko of $39.1 million , $38.1 million and $33.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. See Note 5 .
(2)  
Includes losses related to an incident at the DBM complex for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2015. See Note 1 .
(3)  
Includes affiliate (as defined in Note 1 ) amounts of $(0.1) million , $7.7 million and $(14.4) million for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. See Note 2 and Note 12 .
(4)  
Represents net income (loss) earned on and subsequent to the date of acquisition of the Partnership assets (as defined in Note 1 ). See Note 4 .
(5)  
See Note 4 for the calculation of net income (loss) per common unit.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

116

Table of Contents

WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
 
December 31,
thousands except number of units
 
2017
 
2016
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Current assets
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
78,814

 
$
357,925

Accounts receivable, net (1)
 
160,432

 
223,223

Other current assets
 
14,816

 
12,866

Total current assets
 
254,062

 
594,014

Note receivable – Anadarko
 
260,000

 
260,000

Property, plant and equipment
 
 
 
 
Cost
 
7,871,102

 
6,861,942

Less accumulated depreciation
 
2,140,211

 
1,812,010

Net property, plant and equipment
 
5,730,891

 
5,049,932

Goodwill
 
416,160

 
417,610

Other intangible assets
 
775,269

 
803,698

Equity investments
 
566,211

 
594,208

Other assets
 
11,757

 
13,566

Total assets
 
$
8,014,350

 
$
7,733,028

LIABILITIES, EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
 
 
 
 
Current liabilities
 
 
 
 
Accounts and imbalance payables (2)
 
$
349,801

 
$
247,076

Accrued ad valorem taxes
 
26,633

 
23,121

Accrued liabilities (3)
 
47,899

 
45,108

Total current liabilities
 
424,333

 
315,305

Long-term debt
 
3,464,712

 
3,091,461

Deferred income taxes
 
7,409

 
6,402

Asset retirement obligations and other
 
146,885

 
142,641

Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (4)
 

 
41,440

Total long-term liabilities
 
3,619,006

 
3,281,944

Total liabilities
 
4,043,339

 
3,597,249

Equity and partners’ capital
 
 
 
 
Series A Preferred units (zero and 21,922,831 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively) (5)
 

 
639,545

Common units (152,602,105 and 130,671,970 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)
 
2,950,010

 
2,536,872

Class C units (13,243,883 and 12,358,123 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively) (6)
 
780,040

 
750,831

General partner units (2,583,068 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016)
 
179,232

 
143,968

Total partners’ capital
 
3,909,282

 
4,071,216

Noncontrolling interest
 
61,729

 
64,563

Total equity and partners’ capital
 
3,971,011

 
4,135,779

Total liabilities, equity and partners’ capital
 
$
8,014,350

 
$
7,733,028

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Accounts receivable, net includes amounts receivable from affiliates (as defined in Note 1 ) of $36.3 million and $76.6 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. Accounts receivable, net as of December 31, 2016 , also includes an insurance claim receivable related to an incident at the DBM complex. See Note 1 .
(2)  
Accounts and imbalance payables includes affiliate amounts of $0.3 million and zero as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , respectively.
(3)  
Accrued liabilities includes affiliate amounts of $0.2 million and zero as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , respectively.
(4)  
See Note 2 .
(5)  
The Series A Preferred units converted into common units on a one -for-one basis in 2017. See Note 4 .
(6)  
The Class C units will convert into common units on a one -for-one basis on March 1, 2020, unless the Partnership elects to convert such units earlier or Anadarko extends the conversion date. See Note 4 .

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

117

Table of Contents

WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
 
 
Partners’ Capital
 
 
 
 
thousands
 
Net
Investment
by Anadarko
 
Common
Units
 
Class C
Units
 
Series A Preferred Units
 
General
Partner 
Units
 
Noncontrolling
Interest
 
Total
Balance at December 31, 2014
 
$
556,596

 
$
3,119,714

 
$
716,957

 
$

 
$
105,725

 
$
69,470

 
$
4,568,462

Net income (loss)
 
79,386

 
(238,166
)
 
(18,110
)
 

 
180,996

 
10,101

 
14,207

Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (1)
 

 
18,449

 

 

 

 

 
18,449

Issuance of common units, net of offering expenses
 

 
57,353

 

 

 

 

 
57,353

Amortization of beneficial conversion feature of Class C units
 

 
(12,044
)
 
12,044

 

 

 

 

Distributions to noncontrolling interest owner
 

 

 

 

 

 
(12,187
)
 
(12,187
)
Distributions to unitholders
 

 
(378,602
)
 

 

 
(166,541
)
 

 
(545,143
)
Acquisitions from affiliates
 
(197,562
)
 
23,286

 

 

 

 

 
(174,276
)
Contributions of equity-based compensation from Anadarko
 

 
3,480

 

 

 
71

 

 
3,551

Net pre-acquisition contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko
 
(49,801
)
 

 

 

 

 

 
(49,801
)
Net contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko of other assets
 

 
(4,547
)
 

 

 
(85
)
 

 
(4,632
)
Elimination of net deferred tax liabilities
 
41,844

 

 

 

 

 

 
41,844

Other
 
135

 
68

 

 

 
(2
)
 

 
201

Balance at December 31, 2015
 
$
430,598

 
$
2,588,991

 
$
710,891

 
$

 
$
120,164

 
$
67,384

 
$
3,918,028

Net income (loss)
 
11,326

 
269,018

 
28,642

 
45,784

 
236,561

 
10,963

 
602,294

Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (1)
 

 
45,820

 

 

 

 

 
45,820

Issuance of common units, net of offering expenses
 

 
25,000

 

 

 

 

 
25,000

Issuance of Series A Preferred units, net of offering expenses
 

 

 

 
686,937

 

 

 
686,937

Beneficial conversion feature of Series A Preferred units
 

 
93,409

 

 
(93,409
)
 

 

 

Amortization of beneficial conversion feature of Class C units and Series A Preferred units
 

 
(42,407
)
 
11,298

 
31,109

 

 

 

Distributions to noncontrolling interest owner
 

 

 

 

 

 
(13,784
)
 
(13,784
)
Distributions to unitholders
 

 
(428,231
)
 

 
(30,876
)
 
(212,831
)
 

 
(671,938
)
Acquisitions from affiliates
 
(553,833
)
 
(158,667
)
 

 

 

 

 
(712,500
)
Revision to Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko  (2)
 

 
139,487

 

 

 

 

 
139,487

Contributions of equity-based compensation from Anadarko
 

 
4,131

 

 

 
83

 

 
4,214

Net pre-acquisition contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko
 
(23,491
)
 

 

 

 

 

 
(23,491
)
Net contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko of other assets
 

 
(572
)
 

 

 
(9
)
 

 
(581
)
Elimination of net deferred tax liabilities
 
135,400

 

 

 

 

 

 
135,400

Other
 

 
893

 

 

 

 

 
893

Balance at December 31, 2016
 
$

 
$
2,536,872

 
$
750,831

 
$
639,545

 
$
143,968

 
$
64,563

 
$
4,135,779

Net income (loss)
 

 
231,405

 
24,790

 
7,453

 
303,835

 
10,735

 
578,218

Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (1)
 

 
58,551

 

 

 

 

 
58,551

Conversion of Series A Preferred units into common units (3)
 

 
686,936

 

 
(686,936
)
 

 

 

Amortization of beneficial conversion feature of Class C units and Series A Preferred units
 

 
(66,718
)
 
4,419

 
62,299

 

 

 

Distributions to noncontrolling interest owner
 

 

 

 

 

 
(13,569
)
 
(13,569
)
Distributions to unitholders
 

 
(510,228
)
 

 
(22,361
)
 
(268,711
)
 

 
(801,300
)
Acquisitions from affiliates
 
(1,263
)
 
1,263

 

 

 

 

 

Revision to Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (2)
 

 
4,165

 

 

 

 

 
4,165

Contributions of equity-based compensation from Anadarko
 

 
4,473

 

 

 
90

 

 
4,563

Net pre-acquisition contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko
 
1,263

 

 

 

 

 

 
1,263

Net contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko of other assets
 

 
3,139

 

 

 
50

 

 
3,189

Other
 

 
152

 

 

 

 

 
152

Balance at December 31, 2017
 
$

 
$
2,950,010

 
$
780,040

 
$

 
$
179,232

 
$
61,729

 
$
3,971,011

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
See Note 5 .
(2)  
See Note 2 .
(3)  
See Note 4 .

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

118

Table of Contents

WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Cash flows from operating activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
 
$
578,218

 
$
602,294

 
$
14,207

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
290,874

 
272,933

 
272,611

Impairments
 
178,374

 
15,535

 
515,458

Non-cash equity-based compensation expense
 
4,922

 
4,735

 
4,188

Deferred income taxes
 
2,458

 
2,555

 
11,346

Accretion and amortization of long-term obligations, net
 
4,254

 
(3,789
)
 
17,698

Equity income, net – affiliates
 
(85,194
)
 
(78,717
)
 
(71,251
)
Distributions from equity investment earnings – affiliates
 
87,380

 
82,185

 
82,054

(Gain) loss on divestiture and other, net (1)
 
(132,388
)
 
14,641

 
(57,024
)
Lower of cost or market inventory adjustments
 
145

 
168

 
443

Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable, net
 
(16,127
)
 
(48,947
)
 
(4,371
)
Increase (decrease) in accounts and imbalance payables and accrued liabilities, net
 
(6,930
)
 
58,359

 
1,006

Change in other items, net
 
(4,491
)
 
(4,367
)
 
(720
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
901,495


917,585


785,645

Cash flows from investing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital expenditures
 
(675,025
)
 
(479,993
)
 
(637,964
)
Contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates
 
1,387

 
6,135

 
461

Acquisitions from affiliates
 
(3,910
)
 
(716,465
)
 
(10,903
)
Acquisitions from third parties
 
(155,298
)
 

 
(3,514
)
Investments in equity affiliates
 
(384
)
 
(27
)
 
(11,442
)
Distributions from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings – affiliates
 
23,085

 
21,238

 
16,244

Proceeds from the sale of assets to affiliates
 

 
623

 
925

Proceeds from the sale of assets to third parties
 
23,564

 
45,490

 
145,916

Proceeds from property insurance claims
 
22,977

 
17,465

 

Net cash used in investing activities
 
(763,604
)

(1,105,534
)

(500,277
)
Cash flows from financing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Borrowings, net of debt issuance costs
 
369,989

 
1,297,218

 
889,606

Repayments of debt
 

 
(900,000
)
 
(610,000
)
Settlement of the Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (2)
 
(37,346
)
 

 

Increase (decrease) in outstanding checks
 
5,593

 
2,079

 
(2,666
)
Proceeds from the issuance of common units, net of offering expenses
 
(183
)
 
25,000

 
57,353

Proceeds from the issuance of Series A Preferred units, net of offering expenses
 

 
686,937

 

Distributions to unitholders  (3)
 
(801,300
)
 
(671,938
)
 
(545,143
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest owner
 
(13,569
)
 
(13,784
)
 
(12,187
)
Net contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko
 
1,263

 
(23,491
)
 
(49,801
)
Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (3)
 
58,551

 
45,820

 
18,449

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 
(417,002
)

447,841


(254,389
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 
(279,111
)

259,892


30,979

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 
357,925

 
98,033

 
67,054

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
 
$
78,814


$
357,925


$
98,033

Supplemental disclosures
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accretion expense and revisions to the Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (2)
 
$
(4,094
)
 
$
(147,234
)
 
$
174,276

Net distributions to (contributions from) Anadarko of other assets (4)
 
(3,189
)
 
581

 
4,632

Interest paid, net of capitalized interest
 
137,326

 
106,485

 
94,720

Taxes paid (reimbursements received)
 
1,194

 
838

 
(138
)
Accrued capital expenditures
 
204,309

 
79,253

 
61,454

Fair value of properties and equipment from non-cash third party transactions (2)
 
551,453

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Includes losses related to an incident at the DBM complex for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2015. See Note 1 .
(2)  
See Note 2 .
(3)  
See Note 5 .
(4)  
Includes $(1.4) million related to pipe and equipment purchases and $(1.8) million related to other assets for the year ended December 31, 2017. See Note 5 .

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

119

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

General. Western Gas Partners, LP is a growth-oriented Delaware master limited partnership (“MLP”) formed by Anadarko Petroleum Corporation in 2007 to acquire, own, develop and operate midstream assets.
For purposes of these consolidated financial statements, the “Partnership” refers to Western Gas Partners, LP and its subsidiaries. The Partnership’s general partner, Western Gas Holdings, LLC (the “general partner”), is owned by Western Gas Equity Partners, LP (“WGP”), a Delaware MLP formed by Anadarko Petroleum Corporation in September 2012 to own the Partnership’s general partner, as well as a significant limited partner interest in the Partnership. WGP has no independent operations or material assets other than owning the partnership interests in the Partnership (see Holdings of Partnership equity in Note 4 ). Western Gas Equity Holdings, LLC is WGP’s general partner and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. “Anadarko” refers to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries, excluding the Partnership and the general partner, and “affiliates” refers to subsidiaries of Anadarko, excluding the Partnership, but including equity interests in Fort Union Gas Gathering, LLC (“Fort Union”), White Cliffs Pipeline, LLC (“White Cliffs”), Rendezvous Gas Services, LLC (“Rendezvous”), Enterprise EF78 LLC (the “Mont Belvieu JV”), Texas Express Pipeline LLC (“TEP”), Texas Express Gathering LLC (“TEG”) and Front Range Pipeline LLC (“FRP”). The interests in TEP, TEG and FRP are referred to collectively as the “TEFR Interests.” “MGR assets” refers to the Red Desert complex and the Granger straddle plant.
The Partnership is engaged in the business of gathering, compressing, treating, processing and transporting natural gas; gathering, stabilizing and transporting condensate, natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) and crude oil; and gathering and disposing of produced water. In addition, in its capacity as a processor of natural gas, the Partnership also buys and sells natural gas, NGLs or condensate under certain of its contracts. The Partnership provides these midstream services for Anadarko, as well as for third-party producers and customers. As of December 31, 2017 , the Partnership’s assets and investments consisted of the following:
 
 
Owned and
Operated
 
Operated
Interests
 
Non-Operated
Interests
 
Equity
Interests
Gathering systems (1)
 
12

 
3

 
3

 
2

Treating facilities
 
19

 
3

 

 
3

Natural gas processing plants/trains
 
20

 
4

 

 
2

NGL pipelines
 
2

 

 

 
3

Natural gas pipelines
 
5

 

 

 

Oil pipelines
 

 
1

 

 
1

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Includes the DBM water systems.

These assets and investments are located in the Rocky Mountains (Colorado, Utah and Wyoming), North-central Pennsylvania, Texas and New Mexico. The Partnership commenced operation of two produced water disposal systems in West Texas in the second quarter of 2017 and Train VI at the DBM complex in the fourth quarter of 2017.


120

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Basis of presentation. The following table outlines the Partnership’s ownership interests and the accounting method of consolidation used in the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements:
 
 
Percentage Interest
Equity investments (1)
 
 
Fort Union
 
14.81
%
White Cliffs
 
10
%
Rendezvous
 
22
%
Mont Belvieu JV
 
25
%
TEP
 
20
%
TEG
 
20
%
FRP
 
33.33
%
Proportionate consolidation (2)
 
 
Marcellus Interest systems
 
33.75
%
Newcastle system
 
50
%
Springfield system
 
50.1
%
Full consolidation
 
 
Chipeta (3)
 
75
%
DBJV system (4)
 
100
%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
(1)  
Investments in non-controlled entities over which the Partnership exercises significant influence are accounted for under the equity method. “Equity investment throughput” refers to the Partnership’s share of average throughput for these investments.
(2)  
The Partnership proportionately consolidates its associated share of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses attributable to these assets.
(3)  
The 25% interest in Chipeta Processing LLC (“Chipeta”) held by a third-party member is reflected within noncontrolling interest in the consolidated financial statements.
(4)  
The Partnership acquired an additional 50% interest in the DBJV system (the “Additional DBJV System Interest”) from a third party on March 17, 2017. See Note 2 .

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership and entities in which it holds a controlling financial interest. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

Presentation of Partnership assets. The term “Partnership assets” includes both the assets owned and the interests accounted for under the equity method by the Partnership as of December 31, 2017 (see Note 9 ). Because Anadarko controls the Partnership through its control of WGP, which owns the Partnership’s entire general partner interest, each acquisition of Partnership assets from Anadarko has been considered a transfer of net assets between entities under common control. As such, the Partnership assets acquired from Anadarko were initially recorded at Anadarko’s historic carrying value, which did not correlate to the total acquisition price paid by the Partnership. Further, after an acquisition of Partnership assets from Anadarko, the Partnership may be required to recast its financial statements to include the activities of such Partnership assets from the date of common control.
For those periods requiring recast, the consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the Partnership’s acquisition of the Partnership assets from Anadarko are prepared from Anadarko’s historical cost-basis accounts and may not necessarily be indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if the Partnership had owned the Partnership assets during the periods reported. Net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership assets acquired from Anadarko for periods prior to the Partnership’s acquisition of the Partnership assets is not allocated to the limited partners.


121

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Use of estimates. In preparing financial statements in accordance with GAAP, management makes informed judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Management evaluates its estimates and related assumptions regularly, using historical experience and other methods considered reasonable. Changes in facts and circumstances or additional information may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from these estimates. Effects on the business, financial condition and results of operations resulting from revisions to estimates are recognized when the facts that give rise to the revisions become known. The information furnished herein reflects all normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements, and certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current-year presentation.

Fair value. The fair-value-measurement standard defines fair value as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standard characterizes inputs used in determining fair value according to a hierarchy that prioritizes those inputs based upon the degree to which they are observable. The three input levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 – Inputs represent unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly (for example, quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets not considered to be active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or market-corroborated inputs).

Level 3 – Inputs that are not observable from objective sources, such as management’s internally developed assumptions used in pricing an asset or liability (for example, an estimate of future cash flows used in management’s internally developed present value of future cash flows model that underlies the fair value measurement).

In determining fair value, management uses observable market data when available, or models that incorporate observable market data. When a fair value measurement is required and there is not a market-observable price for the asset or liability or a market-observable price for a similar asset or liability, the cost, income, or multiples approach is used, depending on the quality of information available to support management’s assumptions. The cost approach is based on management’s best estimate of the current asset replacement cost. The income approach uses management’s best assumptions regarding expectations of projected cash flows, and discounts the expected cash flows using a commensurate risk adjusted discount rate. Such evaluations involve a significant amount of judgment, since the results are based on expected future events or conditions, such as sales prices, estimates of future throughput, capital and operating costs and the timing thereof, economic and regulatory climates and other factors. A multiples approach uses management’s best assumptions regarding expectations of projected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”) and the multiple of that EBITDA that a buyer would pay to acquire an asset. Management’s estimates of future net cash flows and EBITDA are inherently imprecise because they reflect management’s expectation of future conditions that are often outside of management’s control. However, the assumptions used reflect a market participant’s view of long-term prices, costs and other factors, and are consistent with assumptions used in the Partnership’s business plans and investment decisions.
In arriving at fair-value estimates, management uses relevant observable inputs available for the valuation technique employed. If a fair value measurement reflects inputs at multiple levels within the hierarchy, the fair value measurement is characterized based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Nonfinancial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value include certain assets and liabilities acquired in a third-party business combination, assets and liabilities exchanged in non-monetary transactions, goodwill and other intangibles, initial recognition of asset retirement obligations, and initial recognition of environmental obligations assumed in a third-party acquisition. Impairment analyses for long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangibles, and the initial recognition of asset retirement obligations and environmental obligations use Level 3 inputs.


122

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

The fair value of debt reflects any premium or discount for the difference between the stated interest rate and the quarter-end market interest rate, and is based on quoted market prices for identical instruments, if available, or based on valuations of similar debt instruments. See Note 12 .
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable reported on the consolidated balance sheets approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these items.

Cash equivalents. All highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents.

Bad-debt reserve. Revenues are primarily from Anadarko, for which no credit limit is maintained. Exposure to bad debts is analyzed on a customer-by-customer basis for its third-party accounts receivable and the Partnership may establish credit limits for significant third-party customers. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , bad-debt reserve was immaterial.

Imbalances. The consolidated balance sheets include imbalance receivables and payables resulting from differences in volumes received into the Partnership’s systems and volumes delivered by the Partnership to customers. Volumes owed to or by the Partnership that are subject to monthly cash settlement are valued according to the terms of the contract as of the balance sheet dates and reflect market index prices. Other volumes owed to or by the Partnership are valued at the Partnership’s weighted-average cost as of the balance sheet dates and are settled in-kind. As of December 31, 2017 , imbalance receivables and payables were $1.6 million and $2.9 million , respectively. As of December 31, 2016 , imbalance receivables and payables were $3.5 million and $3.0 million , respectively. Net changes in imbalance payables and receivables are reported in Cost of product in the consolidated statements of operations.

Inventory. The cost of NGLs inventories is determined by the weighted-average cost method on a location-by-location basis. Inventory is stated at the lower of weighted-average cost or market value and is reported in Other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 10 .

Property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment are generally stated at the lower of historical cost less accumulated depreciation or fair value, if impaired. Because acquisitions of assets from Anadarko are transfers of net assets between entities under common control, the assets acquired from Anadarko are initially recorded at Anadarko’s historic carrying value. The difference between the carrying value of net assets acquired from Anadarko and the consideration paid is recorded as an adjustment to partners’ capital.
Assets acquired in a business combination or non-monetary exchange with a third party are initially recorded at fair value. All construction-related direct labor and material costs are capitalized. The cost of renewals and betterments that extend the useful life of property, plant and equipment is also capitalized. The cost of repairs, replacements and major maintenance projects that do not extend the useful life or increase the expected output of property, plant and equipment is expensed as incurred.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives and salvage values of assets. However, subsequent events could cause a change in estimates, thereby impacting future depreciation amounts. Uncertainties that may impact these estimates include, but are not limited to, changes in laws and regulations relating to environmental matters, including air and water quality, restoration and abandonment requirements, economic conditions, and supply and demand in the area.
Management evaluates the ability to recover the carrying amount of its long-lived assets to determine whether its long-lived assets have been impaired. Impairments exist when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds estimates of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. When alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset are under consideration, estimates of future undiscounted cash flows take into account possible outcomes and probabilities of their occurrence. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable based on the estimated future undiscounted cash flows, the impairment loss is measured as the excess of the asset’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value, such that the asset’s carrying amount is adjusted to its estimated fair value with an offsetting charge to impairment expense. Refer to Note 7 for a description of impairments recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .


123

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Insurance recoveries. Involuntary conversions result from the loss of an asset because of some unforeseen event (e.g., destruction due to fire). Some of these events are insurable and result in property damage insurance recovery. Amounts that are received from insurance carriers are net of any deductibles related to the covered event. A receivable is recorded from insurance to the extent a loss is recognized from an involuntary conversion event and the likelihood of recovering such loss is deemed probable. To the extent that any insurance claim receivables are later judged not probable of recovery (e.g., due to new information), such amounts are expensed. A gain on involuntary conversion is recognized when the amount received from insurance exceeds the net book value of the retired asset(s). In addition, gains related to insurance recoveries are not recognized until all contingencies related to such proceeds have been resolved; that is, a cash payment is received from the insurance carrier or there is a binding settlement agreement with the carrier that clearly states that a payment will be made. To the extent that an asset is rebuilt, the associated expenditures are capitalized, as appropriate, on the consolidated balance sheets and presented as Capital expenditures in the consolidated statements of cash flows. With respect to business interruption insurance claims, income is recognized only when cash proceeds are received from insurers, which are presented in the consolidated statements of operations as a component of Operating income (loss).
On December 3, 2015, there was an initial fire and secondary explosion at the processing facility within the Delaware Basin Midstream, LLC (“DBM”) complex. The majority of the damage from the incident was to the liquid handling facilities and the amine treating units at the inlet of the complex. Train II sustained the most damage of the processing trains and returned to service in December 2016. Train III experienced minimal damage and returned to full service in May 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2015, $20.3 million of losses were recorded in Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations, related to this involuntary conversion event based on the difference between the net book value of the affected assets and the insurance claim receivable. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , a $5.7 million loss was recorded in Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations, related to a change in the Partnership’s estimate of the amount that would be recovered under the property insurance claim based on further discussions with insurers. During the second quarter of 2017, the Partnership reached a settlement with insurers and final proceeds were received. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Partnership received $52.9 million and $33.8 million , respectively, in cash proceeds from insurers, including $29.9 million and $16.3 million , respectively, in proceeds from business interruption insurance claims and $23.0 million and $17.5 million , respectively, in proceeds from property insurance claims. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the consolidated balance sheets included receivables of zero and $30.0 million , respectively, for the property insurance claim related to the incident at the DBM complex.

Capitalized interest. Interest is capitalized as part of the historical cost of constructing assets for significant projects that are in progress. Capitalized interest is determined by multiplying the Partnership’s weighted-average borrowing cost on debt by the average amount of qualifying costs incurred. Once the construction of an asset subject to interest capitalization is completed and the asset is placed in service, the associated capitalized interest is expensed through depreciation or impairment, together with other capitalized costs related to that asset.

Goodwill. Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price of a business acquired exceeds the fair market value of the tangible and separately measurable intangible net assets. In addition, goodwill represents the allocated portion of Anadarko’s midstream goodwill attributed to the Partnership assets acquired from Anadarko. Refer to Note 8 for a discussion of goodwill. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually, as of October 1, or more often as facts and circumstances warrant. The Partnership has allocated goodwill on its two reporting units: (i) gathering and processing and (ii) transportation. An initial qualitative assessment is performed prior to proceeding to the comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit to which goodwill has been assigned, to the carrying amount of net assets, including goodwill, of each reporting unit. If management concludes, based on qualitative factors, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, then goodwill is not impaired, and estimating the fair value of the reporting unit is not necessary. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is written down to its implied fair value through a charge to operating expense. The carrying value of goodwill after such an impairment would represent a Level 3 fair value measurement.


124

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Other intangible assets. The Partnership assesses intangible assets, as described in Note 8 , for impairment together with related underlying long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. See Property, plant and equipment within this Note 1 for further discussion of management’s process to evaluate potential impairment of long-lived assets.

Asset retirement obligations. A liability based on the estimated costs of retiring tangible long-lived assets is recognized as an asset retirement obligation in the period incurred. The liability is recognized at fair value, measured using discounted expected future cash outflows for the asset retirement obligation when the obligation originates, which generally is when an asset is acquired or constructed. The carrying amount of the associated asset is increased commensurate with the liability recognized. Over time, the discounted liability is adjusted to its expected settlement value through accretion expense, which is reported within Depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the liability is also adjusted for any changes in the expected value of the retirement obligation (with a corresponding adjustment to property, plant and equipment) until the obligation is settled. Revisions in estimated asset retirement obligations may result from changes in estimated inflation rates, discount rates, asset retirement costs and the estimated timing of settling asset retirement obligations. See Note 11 .

Environmental expenditures. The Partnership expenses environmental obligations related to conditions caused by past operations that do not generate current or future revenues. Environmental obligations related to operations that generate current or future revenues are expensed or capitalized, as appropriate. Liabilities are recorded when the necessity for environmental remediation or other potential environmental liabilities becomes probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Accruals for estimated losses from environmental remediation obligations are recognized no later than at the time of the completion of the remediation feasibility study. These accruals are adjusted as additional information becomes available or as circumstances change. Costs of future expenditures for environmental-remediation obligations are not discounted to their present value. See Note 13 .

Segments. The Partnership’s operations are organized into a single operating segment, the assets of which gather, compress, treat, process and transport natural gas; gather, stabilize and transport condensate, NGLs and crude oil; and gather and dispose of produced water in the United States.

Revenues and cost of product. The revenue recognition policies described in this section reflect the Partnership’s revenue recognition through December 31, 2017. The Partnership adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“Topic 606”), effective January 1, 2018. See Accounting standards adopted in 2018 below for further discussion.
Under its fee-based gathering, treating, processing and disposal arrangements, the Partnership is paid a fixed fee based on the volume and/or thermal content of natural gas or produced water and recognizes revenues for its services in the month such services are performed. Producers’ wells or production facilities are connected to the Partnership’s gathering systems for delivery of natural gas to the Partnership’s processing or treating plants, where the natural gas is processed to extract NGLs and condensate or treated in order to satisfy pipeline specifications. In some areas, where no processing is required, the producers’ gas is gathered and delivered to pipelines for market delivery. Under cost-of-service gathering agreements, fees are earned for gathering and compression services based on rates calculated in a cost-of-service model and reviewed periodically over the life of the agreements. Under percent-of-proceeds contracts, revenue is recognized when the natural gas, NGLs or condensate is sold. The percentage of the product sale ultimately paid to the producer is recorded as a related cost of product expense.


125

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

In certain circumstances, the Partnership purchases natural gas volumes at the wellhead or production facility for gathering and processing. As a result, the Partnership has volumes of NGLs and condensate to sell and volumes of residue to sell, to use for system fuel or to satisfy keep-whole obligations. In addition, depending upon specific contract terms, condensate and NGLs recovered during gathering and processing are either returned to the producer or retained and sold. Under keep-whole contracts, when condensate or NGLs are retained and sold, producers are kept whole for the condensate or NGL volumes through the receipt of a thermally equivalent volume of residue. The keep-whole contract conveys an economic benefit to the Partnership when the combined value of the individual NGLs is greater in the form of liquids than as a component of the natural gas stream; however, the Partnership is adversely impacted when the value of the NGLs is lower than the value of the natural gas stream including the liquids. The Partnership has commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko to mitigate exposure to a majority of the commodity price risk inherent in its percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts. See Note 5 . Revenue is recognized from the sale of condensate and NGLs upon transfer of title, and related purchases are recorded as cost of product.
The Partnership earns transportation revenues through firm contracts that obligate each of its customers to pay a monthly reservation or demand charge regardless of the pipeline capacity used by that customer. An additional commodity usage fee is charged to the customer based on the actual volume of natural gas transported. Transportation revenues are also generated from interruptible contracts pursuant to which a fee is charged to the customer based on volumes transported through the pipeline. Revenues for transportation of natural gas and NGLs are recognized over the period of firm transportation contracts or, in the case of usage fees and interruptible contracts, when the volumes are received into the pipeline. From time to time, certain revenues may be subject to refund pending the outcome of rate matters before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and refund reserve liabilities are established where appropriate.
Revenues attributable to the fixed-fee component of gathering and processing contracts as well as demand charges and commodity usage fees on transportation contracts are reported as revenues from gathering, processing, transportation and disposal in the consolidated statements of operations. Proceeds from the sale of residue, NGLs and condensate are reported as revenues from natural gas and natural gas liquids sales in the consolidated statements of operations.

Equity-based compensation. Prior to October 17, 2017, phantom unit awards were granted under the Western Gas Partners, LP 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “WES 2008 LTIP”). On October 17, 2017, however, the Partnership’s common and Class C unitholders approved the Western Gas Partners, LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “WES 2017 LTIP”), which replaced the WES 2008 LTIP. As used in this section, the term “WES LTIP” refers to the WES 2008 LTIP with respect to awards granted prior to October 17, 2017, and to the WES 2017 LTIP with respect to awards granted after October 17, 2017. The WES 2017 LTIP permits the issuance of up to 2,250,000 units, all of which remain available for future issuance as of December 31, 2017 . Upon vesting of each phantom unit awarded under the WES LTIP, the holder will receive common units of the Partnership or, at the discretion of the Board of Directors of its general partner (the “Board of Directors”), cash in an amount equal to the market value of common units of the Partnership on the vesting date. Equity-based compensation expense attributable to grants made under the WES LTIP impacts cash flows from operating activities only to the extent cash payments are made to a participant in lieu of issuance of common units to the participant. Stock-based compensation expense attributable to awards granted under the WES LTIP is amortized over the vesting periods applicable to the awards.
Additionally, general and administrative expenses include equity-based compensation costs allocated by Anadarko to the Partnership for grants made pursuant to (i) the Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “WGP LTIP”) and (ii) the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2008 and 2012 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plans (Anadarko’s plans are referred to collectively as the “Anadarko Incentive Plans”) for all periods presented. Grants made under equity-based compensation plans result in equity-based compensation expense, which is determined by reference to the fair value of equity compensation. For equity-based awards ultimately settled through the issuance of units or stock, the fair value is measured as of the date of the relevant equity grant. Equity-based compensation granted under the WGP LTIP and the Anadarko Incentive Plans does not impact cash flows from operating activities since the offset to compensation expense is recorded as a contribution to partners’ capital in the consolidated financial statements at the time of contribution, when the expense is realized.


126

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Income taxes. The Partnership generally is not subject to federal income tax or state income tax other than Texas margin tax on the portion of its income that is apportionable to Texas. Deferred state income taxes are recorded on temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. The Partnership routinely assesses the realizability of its deferred tax assets. If the Partnership concludes that it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, the tax asset is reduced by a valuation allowance. Federal and state current and deferred income tax expense was recorded on the Partnership assets prior to the Partnership’s acquisition of these assets from Anadarko.
For periods beginning on and subsequent to the Partnership’s acquisition of the Partnership assets, the Partnership makes payments to Anadarko pursuant to the tax sharing agreement entered into between Anadarko and the Partnership for its estimated share of taxes from all forms of taxation, excluding taxes imposed by the United States, that are included in any combined or consolidated returns filed by Anadarko. The aggregate difference in the basis of the Partnership’s assets for financial and tax reporting purposes cannot be readily determined as the Partnership does not have access to information about each partner’s tax attributes in the Partnership.
The accounting standards for uncertain tax positions defines the criteria an individual tax position must satisfy for any part of the benefit of that position to be recognized in the financial statements. The Partnership had no material uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2017 or 2016 .
With respect to assets acquired from Anadarko, the Partnership recorded Anadarko’s historic deferred income taxes for the periods prior to the Partnership’s ownership of the assets. For periods subsequent to the Partnership’s acquisition, the Partnership is not subject to tax except for the Texas margin tax and, accordingly, does not record deferred federal income taxes related to the assets acquired from Anadarko.

Net income (loss) per common unit. The Partnership applies the two-class method in determining net income (loss) per unit applicable to MLPs having multiple classes of securities including common units, Class C units, general partner units and incentive distribution rights (“IDRs”). The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that treats participating securities as having rights to earnings that otherwise would have been available to common unitholders. Under the two-class method, net income (loss) per unit is calculated as if all of the earnings for the period were distributed pursuant to the terms of the relevant contractual arrangement. The accounting guidance provides the methodology for the allocation of undistributed earnings to the general partner, limited partners and IDR holders and the circumstances in which such an allocation should be made. For the Partnership, earnings per unit is calculated based on the assumption that the Partnership distributes to its unitholders an amount of cash equal to the net income of the Partnership, notwithstanding the general partner’s ultimate discretion over the amount of cash to be distributed for the period, the existence of other legal or contractual limitations that would prevent distributions of all of the net income for the period or any other economic or practical limitation on the ability to make a full distribution of all of the net income for the period. See Note 4 .

Accounting standards adopted in 2017.  ASU 2017-04,  Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)  eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test in an effort to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill. The Partnership adopted this ASU using a prospective approach on January 1, 2017. This ASU will only be applicable to the extent that the Partnership determines its goodwill is impaired.
ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business assists in determining whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition or disposal of assets or a business. This ASU provides a screen that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired, or disposed of, are concentrated in a single identifiable asset, or a group of similar identifiable assets, the assets will not be considered a business. If the screen is not met, the assets must include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create an output to be considered a business. The Partnership’s adoption of this ASU on January 1, 2017, using a prospective approach, could have a material impact on future consolidated financial statements as goodwill will not be allocated to divestitures or recorded on acquisitions that are not considered businesses.


127

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs and eliminates the exception for an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. The Partnership adopted this ASU on January 1, 2017, using a modified retrospective approach, with no impact to its consolidated financial statements.
    
Accounting standards adopted in 2018. ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash requires an entity to explain the changes in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows and to provide a reconciliation of the totals in that statement to the related captions in the balance sheet when the cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item on the balance sheet. The Partnership adopted this ASU using a retrospective approach on January 1, 2018. Adoption will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) supersedes current revenue recognition requirements and industry-specific guidance, and requires an entity to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The Partnership adopted this new standard beginning January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method applied to contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018. The cumulative effect adjustment that will be recognized in the opening balance of equity and partners’ capital will not be material. The Partnership implemented new business processes, procedures, controls and system changes to gather, categorize and analyze the necessary data for the accounting changes and expanded disclosure under Topic 606. Beginning in 2018, additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures will be required, including (i) expanded descriptions of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows from contracts with customers, (ii) details of customer contract assets and liabilities, (iii) revenue from customers on a disaggregated basis, and (iv) comparative information presented under both Topic 605, Revenue Recognition (“Topic 605”) and Topic 606. While the Partnership does not expect 2018 net income to be materially impacted by revenue recognition timing changes as a result of applying Topic 606, there will be significant changes to the presentation of revenues and related expenses recognized beginning January 1, 2018. The impacts of adopting Topic 606 include the following:

Transactions that will affect net income in 2018:

Fee-based gathering / processing. Under Topic 605, fee revenue was recognized based on the rate in effect for the month of service, even when certain fees were charged on an upfront or limited-term basis. In addition, certain contingent fees were charged and recognized only when the customer did not meet the specified delivery minimums for the completed performance period. Under Topic 606, the Partnership will recognize revenue associated with upfront or limited-term fees over the expected period of benefit. In addition, the contingent fees will be estimated and recognized as the services are performed for the customer’s delivered volumes. Differences between revenue recognized and amounts billed to customers will be recognized as contract assets or contract liabilities as appropriate. This will result in a change in the timing of revenue and changes to net income as a result of the consideration provisions. The magnitude of this change is dependent on future customer volumes subject to the impacted contracts.

Cost of service rate adjustments. The Partnership receives fee revenue from contracts that require periodic rate redeterminations based upon the Partnership’s costs of service. Under Topic 605, revenue was recognized based on the amounts billed to customers each period. Management is continuing to evaluate the proper accounting for these cost of service-based rate changes under Topic 606. The final conclusion about the accounting for these rate redeterminations could impact the cumulative effect adjustment that will be recorded effective January 1, 2018.


128

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Aid in construction. Under certain midstream service contracts, the Partnership receives reimbursement for capital costs necessary to provide services to the customer (i.e., connection costs, etc.). These reimbursements historically have been reflected as a reduction to property, plant and equipment upon receipt (and a reduction to capital expenditures). Beginning in 2018, reimbursement of capital costs received from customers will be reflected as a contract liability (deferred revenue) upon receipt. The contract liability will be amortized to revenue over the expected period of benefit. The magnitude of this change to net income and to the Partnership’s capital expenditures is dependent on the amount of aid in construction reimbursements received from customers.

Transactions with a presentation change beginning in 2018, but no effect on net income:

Percentage of proceeds - gathering / processing. Under Topic 605, the Partnership recognized cost of product expense when the product was purchased from a producer to whom it provided midstream services and recognized revenue when the product was sold to a third party. Under Topic 606, in some instances where all or a percentage of the proceeds from the sale must be returned to the producer, the net margin from the purchase and sale transactions will be presented net within revenue because the Partnership is acting as the producer’s agent in the sale. While reported product sales revenue and expense will be materially reduced, these presentation changes will not impact net income. The magnitude of this change is dependent on future customer volumes subject to the impacted contracts and commodity prices for those volumes.

Noncash consideration - keep-whole and percentage of product agreements. The Partnership receives noncash consideration in the form of gas and/or NGL products in exchange for services under certain midstream contracts. Under Topic 605, the Partnership recognized revenue only upon the sale of the related products. Under Topic 606, the Partnership will recognize revenue for the products received as noncash consideration in exchange for the services provided to the customer, with the keep-whole noncash consideration value based on the net value of the NGLs over the replacement residue gas. The Partnership will also recognize both revenue and cost of product expense upon sale of the related products to a different customer. Reported revenue and expense are not expected to be materially impacted by this change, and there will be no impact to net income. The magnitude of this change is dependent on future customer volumes subject to the impacted contracts and commodity prices for those volumes.

Wellhead purchase / sale incorporated into gathering / processing. Under Topic 605, the gas purchase cost was recognized as cost of product expense and any specified gathering or processing fees charged to the producer were recognized as revenue. Under Topic 606, the fees charged to the contract counterparty are recognized as adjustments to the purchase cost instead of revenue when such fees relate to services performed after control of the product transfers to the Partnership. While there is no impact to net income, it will result in decreased revenue and cost of product expense. The magnitude of this change is dependent on future customer volumes subject to the impacted contracts.

New accounting standards issued but not yet adopted.   ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) requires lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset for all leases, including operating leases, with a term greater than 12 months on the balance sheet. This ASU modifies the definition of a lease and outlines the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leasing arrangements by both lessees and lessors. Certain practical expedients will be used to implement the new standard and the Partnership will not reassess contracts that commenced prior to adoption. The Partnership will make a policy election not to recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities for leases with a term of 12 months or less. The Partnership is reviewing contracts for its portfolio of leased assets to assess the impact of adopting the new standard, which is expected to primarily affect other assets and other long-term liabilities. The Partnership is also evaluating its systems, processes, and internal controls to facilitate compliance with this new standard. The Partnership will complete its evaluation in 2018 and adopt this new standard on January 1, 2019, using a modified retrospective approach for all comparative periods presented.


129

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2.  ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES

The following table presents the acquisitions completed by the Partnership during 2017 , 2016 and 2015, and identifies the funding sources for such acquisitions:
thousands except unit and percent amounts
 
Acquisition
Date
 
Percentage
Acquired
 
Borrowings
 
Cash
On Hand
 
Common Units
Issued
 
Series A
Preferred Units Issued
DBJV system (1)
 
03/02/2015
 
50
%
 
$

 
$

 

 

Springfield system (2)
 
03/14/2016
 
50.1
%
 
247,500

 

 
2,089,602

 
14,030,611

DBJV system (3)
 
03/17/2017
 
50
%
 

 
155,000

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                   
(1)  
The Partnership acquired Delaware Basin JV Gathering LLC (“DBJV”) from Anadarko. At the time of acquisition, DBJV owned a 50% interest in a gathering system and related facilities (the “DBJV system”) located in the Delaware Basin in Loving, Ward, Winkler and Reeves Counties, Texas. At the acquisition date, the Partnership estimated the future payment would be $282.8 million , the estimated net present value of which was $174.3 million . For further information, see DBJV acquisition—deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko below.
(2)  
The Partnership acquired Springfield Pipeline LLC (“Springfield”) from Anadarko for $750.0 million , consisting of $712.5 million in cash and the issuance of 1,253,761 of the Partnership’s common units. Springfield owns a 50.1% interest in an oil gathering system and a gas gathering system. The Springfield oil and gas gathering systems (collectively, the “Springfield system”) are located in Dimmit, La Salle, Maverick and Webb Counties in South Texas. The Partnership financed the cash portion of the acquisition through: (i) borrowings of $247.5 million on the Partnership’s senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“RCF”), (ii) the issuance of 835,841 of the Partnership’s common units to WGP and (iii) the issuance of Series A Preferred units to private investors. See Note 4 for further information regarding the Series A Preferred units.
(3)  
The Partnership acquired the Additional DBJV System Interest from a third party. See Property exchange below.

Property exchange. On March 17, 2017, the Partnership acquired the Additional DBJV System Interest from a third party in exchange for (a) the Partnership’s 33.75% non-operated interest in two natural gas gathering systems located in northern Pennsylvania (the “Non-Operated Marcellus Interest”), commonly referred to as the Liberty and Rome systems, and (b) $155.0 million of cash consideration (collectively, the “Property Exchange”). The Partnership previously held a 50% interest in, and operated, the DBJV system.
The Property Exchange is reflected as a nonmonetary transaction whereby the acquired Additional DBJV System Interest is recorded at the fair value of the divested Non-Operated Marcellus Interest plus the $155.0 million of cash consideration. The Property Exchange resulted in a net gain of $125.7 million recorded as Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations. Results of operations attributable to the Property Exchange were included in the consolidated statements of operations beginning on the acquisition date in the first quarter of 2017.


130

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2.  ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES (CONTINUED)

DBJV acquisition - Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko. Prior to the Partnership’s agreement with Anadarko to settle its deferred purchase price obligation early, the consideration that would have been paid by the Partnership for the March 2015 acquisition of DBJV from Anadarko consisted of a cash payment to Anadarko due on March 31, 2020. The cash payment would have been equal to (a) eight multiplied by the average of the Partnership’s share of Net Earnings (as defined below) of DBJV for the calendar years 2018 and 2019, less (b) the Partnership’s share of all capital expenditures incurred for DBJV between March 1, 2015, and February 29, 2020. Net Earnings was defined as all revenues less cost of product, operating expenses and property taxes, in each case attributable to DBJV on an accrual basis. In May 2017, the Partnership reached an agreement with Anadarko to settle this obligation with a cash payment to Anadarko of $37.3 million , which was equal to the estimated net present value of the obligation at March 31, 2017.
The following table summarizes the financial statement impact of the Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko:
 
 
Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko
 
Estimated future payment obligation (1)
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
$
188,674

 
$
282,807

Accretion revision (2)
 
(7,747
)
 
 
Revision to Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (3)
 
(139,487
)
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2016
 
41,440

 
56,455

Accretion expense (4)
 
71

 
 
Revision to Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko  (3)
 
(4,165
)
 
 
Settlement of the Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko
 
(37,346
)
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2017
 
$

 
$

                                                                                                                                                                                   
(1)  
Calculated using Level 3 inputs.
(2)  
Financing-related accretion revisions were recorded in Interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
(3)  
Recorded as revisions within Common units in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital.
(4)  
Accretion expense was recorded as a charge to Interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Helper and Clawson systems divestiture. During the second quarter of 2017, the Helper and Clawson systems, located in Utah, were sold to a third party, resulting in a net gain on sale of $16.3 million recorded as Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations.

Hugoton system divestiture.  During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Hugoton system, located in Southwest Kansas and Oklahoma, was sold to a third party, resulting in a net loss on sale of $12.0 million recorded as Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations. The Partnership allocated $1.6 million in goodwill to this divestiture.

Dew and Pinnacle systems divestiture. During the third quarter of 2015, the Dew and Pinnacle systems in East Texas were sold to a third party, resulting in a net gain on sale of $77.3 million recorded as Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations. The Partnership allocated $5.1 million in goodwill to this divestiture.


131

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3.  PARTNERSHIP DISTRIBUTIONS

The partnership agreement requires the Partnership to distribute all of its available cash (as defined in the partnership agreement) to unitholders of record on the applicable record date within 45 days of the end of each quarter. The Board of Directors declared the following cash distributions to the Partnership’s common and general partner unitholders for the periods presented:
thousands except per-unit amounts
Quarters Ended
 
Total Quarterly
Distribution
per Unit
 
Total Quarterly
Cash Distribution
 
Date of
Distribution
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31
 
$
0.725

 
$
133,203

 
May 2015
June 30
 
0.750

 
139,736

 
August 2015
September 30
 
0.775

 
146,160

 
November 2015
December 31
 
0.800

 
152,588

 
February 2016
2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31
 
$
0.815

 
$
158,905

 
May 2016
June 30
 
0.830

 
162,827

 
August 2016
September 30
 
0.845

 
166,742

 
November 2016
December 31
 
0.860

 
170,657

 
February 2017
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31
 
$
0.875

 
$
188,753

 
May 2017
June 30
 
0.890

 
207,491

 
August 2017
September 30
 
0.905

 
212,038

 
November 2017
December 31 (1)
 
0.920

 
216,586

 
February 2018
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
The Board of Directors declared a cash distribution to the Partnership’s unitholders for the fourth quarter of 2017 of $0.920 per unit, or $216.6 million in aggregate, including incentive distributions, but excluding distributions on Class C units (see Class C unit distributions below). The cash distribution was paid on February 13, 2018 , to unitholders of record at the close of business on February 1, 2018 .

Available cash. The amount of available cash (as defined in the partnership agreement) generally is all cash on hand at the end of the quarter, plus, at the discretion of the general partner, working capital borrowings made subsequent to the end of such quarter, less the amount of cash reserves established by the Partnership’s general partner to provide for the proper conduct of the Partnership’s business, including reserves to fund future capital expenditures; to comply with applicable laws, debt instruments or other agreements; or to provide funds for distributions to its unitholders and to its general partner for any one or more of the next four quarters. Working capital borrowings generally include borrowings made under a credit facility or similar financing arrangement. Working capital borrowings may only be those that, at the time of such borrowings, were intended to be repaid within 12 months. In all cases, working capital borrowings are used solely for working capital purposes or to fund distributions to partners.

Class C unit distributions. The Class C units receive quarterly distributions at a rate equivalent to the Partnership’s common units. The distributions are paid in the form of additional Class C units (“PIK Class C units”) until the scheduled conversion date on March 1, 2020 (unless earlier converted), and the Class C units are disregarded with respect to distributions of the Partnership’s available cash until they are converted into common units. The number of additional PIK Class C units to be issued in connection with a distribution payable on the Class C units is determined by dividing the corresponding distribution attributable to the Class C units by the volume-weighted-average price of the Partnership’s common units for the ten days immediately preceding the payment date for the common unit distribution, less a 6% discount. The Partnership records the PIK Class C unit distributions at fair value at the time of issuance. This Level 2 fair value measurement uses the Partnership’s unit price as a significant input in the determination of the fair value. See Note 4 for further discussion of the Class C units.


132

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3.  PARTNERSHIP DISTRIBUTIONS (CONTINUED)

Series A Preferred unit distributions. As further described in Note 4 , the Partnership issued Series A Preferred units representing limited partner interests in the Partnership to private investors in 2016. The Series A Preferred unitholders received quarterly distributions in cash equal to $0.68 per Series A Preferred unit, subject to certain adjustments. The following table summarizes the Series A Preferred unitholders’ cash distributions for the periods presented:
thousands except per-unit amounts
Quarters Ended
 
Total Quarterly
Distribution
per Unit
 
Total Quarterly
Cash Distribution
 
Date of
Distribution
2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31 (1)
 
$
0.68

 
$
1,887

 
May 2016
June 30 (2)
 
0.68

 
14,082

 
August 2016
September 30
 
0.68

 
14,907

 
November 2016
December 31
 
0.68

 
14,908

 
February 2017
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31
 
$
0.68

 
$
7,453

 
May 2017
                                                                                                                                                                                   
(1)  
Quarterly per unit distribution prorated for the 18 -day period during which 14,030,611 Series A Preferred units were outstanding during the first quarter of 2016.
(2)  
Full quarterly per unit distribution on 14,030,611 Series A Preferred units and quarterly per unit distribution prorated for the 77 -day period during which 7,892,220 Series A Preferred units were outstanding during the second quarter of 2016.

On March 1, 2017, 50% of the outstanding Series A Preferred units converted into common units on a one -for-one basis, and on May 2, 2017, all remaining Series A Preferred units converted into common units on a one -for-one basis. Such converted common units were entitled to distributions made to common unitholders with respect to the quarter during which the applicable conversion occurred and did not include a prorated Series A Preferred unit distribution.

General partner interest and incentive distribution rights. As of December 31, 2017 , the general partner was entitled to 1.5% of all quarterly distributions that the Partnership makes prior to its liquidation and, as the holder of the IDRs, was entitled to incentive distributions at the maximum distribution sharing percentage of 48.0% for all periods presented, after the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels had been achieved. The maximum distribution sharing percentage of 49.5% does not include any distributions that the general partner may receive on common units that it may acquire.


133

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4.  EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

Equity offerings. Pursuant to the Partnership’s registration statement filed with the SEC in August 2014 authorizing the issuance of up to an aggregate of $500.0 million of common units in a continuous offering program, during the year ended December 31, 2015, the Partnership issued 873,525 common units, at an average price of $66.61 , generating proceeds of $57.4 million (net of $0.8 million for the underwriting discount and other offering expenses). Net proceeds were used for general partnership purposes, including funding capital expenditures. Gross proceeds generated during the three months and year ended December 31, 2015, were zero and $58.2 million , respectively. Commissions paid during the three months and year ended December 31, 2015, were zero and $0.6 million , respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017, the Partnership issued no common units under the registration statement filed in August 2014. In July 2017, the Partnership filed a registration statement with the SEC for the issuance of up to an aggregate of $500.0 million of common units pursuant to a new continuous offering program that has not yet been initiated.

Class C units. In November 2014, the Partnership issued 10,913,853 Class C units to APC Midstream Holdings, LLC (“AMH”), pursuant to a Unit Purchase Agreement with Anadarko and AMH. The Class C units were issued to partially fund the acquisition of DBM.
When issued, the Class C units were scheduled to convert into common units on a one -for-one basis on December 31, 2017. In February 2017, Anadarko elected to extend the conversion date of the Class C units to March 1, 2020. The Partnership can elect to convert the Class C units earlier or Anadarko can extend the conversion date again.
The Class C units were issued at a discount to the then-current market price of the common units into which they are convertible. This discount, totaling $34.8 million , represents a beneficial conversion feature, and at issuance, was reflected as an increase in common unitholders’ capital and a decrease in Class C unitholder capital to reflect the fair value of the Class C units at issuance. The beneficial conversion feature is considered a non-cash distribution that is recognized from the date of issuance through the date of conversion, resulting in an increase in Class C unitholder capital and a decrease in common unitholders’ capital as amortized. The beneficial conversion feature is amortized assuming the extended conversion date of March 1, 2020, using the effective yield method. The impact of the beneficial conversion feature amortization is also included in the calculation of earnings per unit.

Series A Preferred units. In connection with the closing of the Springfield acquisition on March 14, 2016, the Partnership issued 14,030,611 Series A Preferred units to private investors for a cash purchase price of $32.00 per unit, generating proceeds of $440.0 million (net of fees and expenses, but including a 2.0% transaction fee paid to the private investors). In April 2016, the Partnership issued an additional 7,892,220 Series A Preferred units pursuant to the full exercise of an option granted in connection with the Series A units issuance in March 2016, generating net proceeds of $246.9 million . Pursuant to an agreement between the Partnership and the holders of the Series A Preferred units, 50% of the Series A Preferred units converted into common units on a one -for-one basis on March 1, 2017, and all remaining Series A Preferred units converted into common units on a one -for-one basis on May 2, 2017. The Partnership has an effective registration statement with the SEC relating to the public resale of the common units issued upon conversion of the Series A Preferred units.
The Series A Preferred units were issued at a discount to the then-current market price of the common units into which they were convertible. This discount, totaling $93.4 million , represented a beneficial conversion feature, and at issuance, was reflected as an increase in common unitholders’ capital and a decrease in Series A Preferred unitholders’ capital to reflect the fair value of the Series A Preferred units on the date of issuance. The beneficial conversion feature was considered a non-cash distribution that was recognized from the date of issuance through the date of conversion, resulting in an increase in Series A Preferred unitholders’ capital and a decrease in common unitholders’ capital as amortized. The beneficial conversion feature was amortized using the effective yield method. The impact of the beneficial conversion feature amortization is also included in the calculation of earnings per unit. For the year ended December 31, 2017 , the amortization for the beneficial conversion feature of the Series A Preferred units was $62.3 million .


134

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4.  EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (CONTINUED)

Partnership interests. The Partnership’s common units are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “WES.”
The following table summarizes the common, Class C, Series A Preferred and general partner units issued during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 
 
Common
Units
 
Class C
Units
 
Series A
Preferred
Units
 
General
Partner
Units
 
Total
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
128,576,965

 
11,411,862

 

 
2,583,068

 
142,571,895

PIK Class C units
 

 
946,261

 

 

 
946,261

Springfield acquisition
 
2,089,602

 

 
14,030,611

 

 
16,120,213

April 2016 Series A units issuance
 

 

 
7,892,220

 

 
7,892,220

Long-Term Incentive Plan award vestings
 
5,403

 

 

 

 
5,403

Balance at December 31, 2016
 
130,671,970


12,358,123


21,922,831

 
2,583,068


167,535,992

PIK Class C units
 

 
885,760

 

 

 
885,760

Conversion of Series A Preferred units
 
21,922,831

 

 
(21,922,831
)
 

 

Long-Term Incentive Plan award vestings
 
7,304

 

 

 

 
7,304

Balance at December 31, 2017
 
152,602,105

 
13,243,883

 

 
2,583,068

 
168,429,056


Holdings of Partnership equity. As of December 31, 2017 , WGP held 50,132,046 common units, representing a 29.8% limited partner interest in the Partnership, and, through its ownership of the general partner, WGP indirectly held 2,583,068 general partner units, representing a 1.5% general partner interest in the Partnership, and 100% of the IDRs. As of December 31, 2017 , other subsidiaries of Anadarko collectively held 2,011,380 common units and 13,243,883 Class C units, representing an aggregate 9.1% limited partner interest in the Partnership. As of December 31, 2017 , the public held 100,458,679 common units, representing the remaining 59.6% limited partner interest in the Partnership.

Net income (loss) per unit for common units. Net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership assets acquired from Anadarko for periods prior to the Partnership’s acquisition of the Partnership assets is not allocated to the unitholders for purposes of calculating net income (loss) per common unit. Net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP earned on and subsequent to the date of acquisition of the Partnership assets is allocated as follows:

General partner. The general partner’s allocation is equal to cash distributions plus its portion of undistributed earnings or losses. Specifically, net income equal to the amount of available cash (as defined by the partnership agreement) is allocated to the general partner consistent with actual cash distributions and capital account allocations, including incentive distributions. Undistributed earnings (net income in excess of distributions) or undistributed losses (available cash in excess of net income) are then allocated to the general partner in accordance with its weighted-average ownership percentage during each period.

Series A Preferred unitholders. The Series A Preferred units were not considered a participating security as they only had distribution rights up to the specified per-unit quarterly distribution and had no rights to the Partnership’s undistributed earnings and losses. As such, the Series A Preferred unitholders’ allocation was equal to their cash distribution plus the amortization of the Series A Preferred units beneficial conversion feature (see Series A Preferred units above).


135

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4.  EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (CONTINUED)

Common and Class C unitholders. The Class C units are considered a participating security because they participate in distributions with common units according to a predetermined formula (see Note 3 ). The common and Class C unitholders’ allocation is equal to their cash distributions plus their respective portions of undistributed earnings or losses. Specifically, net income equal to the amount of available cash (as defined by the partnership agreement) is allocated to the common and Class C unitholders consistent with actual cash distributions and capital account allocations. Undistributed earnings or undistributed losses are then allocated to the common and Class C unitholders in accordance with their respective weighted-average ownership percentages during each period. The common unitholder allocation also includes the impact of the amortization of the Series A Preferred units and Class C units beneficial conversion features. The Class C unitholder allocation is similarly impacted by the amortization of the Class C units beneficial conversion feature (see  Class C units  above).

Calculation of net income (loss) per unit. Basic net income (loss) per common unit is calculated by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders by the weighted-average number of common units outstanding during the period. The common units issued in connection with acquisitions and equity offerings are included on a weighted-average basis for periods they were outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per common unit is calculated by dividing the sum of (i) the net income (loss) attributable to common units adjusted for distributions on the Series A Preferred units and a reallocation of the common and Class C limited partners’ interest in net income (loss) assuming, prior to the actual conversion, conversion of the Series A Preferred units into common units, and (ii) the net income (loss) attributable to the Class C units as a participating security, by the sum of the weighted-average number of common units outstanding plus the dilutive effect of (i) the weighted-average number of outstanding Class C units and (ii) the weighted-average number of common units outstanding assuming, prior to the actual conversion, conversion of the Series A Preferred units.
The following table illustrates the Partnership’s calculation of net income (loss) per unit for common units:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except per-unit amounts
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP
 
$
567,483

 
$
591,331

 
$
4,106

Pre-acquisition net (income) loss allocated to Anadarko
 

 
(11,326
)
 
(79,386
)
Series A Preferred units interest in net (income) loss (1)
 
(42,373
)
 
(76,893
)
 

General partner interest in net (income) loss
 
(303,835
)
 
(236,561
)
 
(180,996
)
Common and Class C limited partners’ interest in net income (loss)
 
$
221,275

 
$
266,551

 
$
(256,276
)
Net income (loss) allocable to common units (1)
 
$
192,066

 
$
226,611

 
$
(250,210
)
Net income (loss) allocable to Class C units (1)
 
29,209

 
39,940

 
(6,066
)
Common and Class C limited partners’ interest in net income (loss)
 
$
221,275

 
$
266,551

 
$
(256,276
)
Net income (loss) per unit
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common units – basic and diluted (2)
 
$
1.30

 
$
1.74

 
$
(1.95
)
Weighted-average units outstanding
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common units – basic and diluted
 
147,194

 
130,253

 
128,345

Excluded due to anti-dilutive effect:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class C units  (2)
 
12,776

 
11,945

 
11,114

Series A Preferred units assuming conversion to common units (2)
 
5,406

 
16,860

 

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Adjusted to reflect amortization of the beneficial conversion features.
(2)  
The impact of Class C units and the conversion of Series A Preferred units would be anti-dilutive for all periods presented. On March 1, 2017, 50% of the outstanding Series A Preferred units converted into common units on a one -for-one basis, and on May 2, 2017, all remaining Series A Preferred units converted into common units on a one -for-one basis.


136

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Affiliate transactions. Revenues from affiliates include amounts earned by the Partnership from services provided to Anadarko as well as from the sale of residue and NGLs to Anadarko. In addition, the Partnership purchases natural gas from an affiliate of Anadarko pursuant to gas purchase agreements. Operation and maintenance expense includes amounts accrued for or paid to affiliates for the operation of the Partnership assets, whether in providing services to affiliates or to third parties, including field labor, measurement and analysis, and other disbursements. A portion of the Partnership’s general and administrative expenses is paid by Anadarko, which results in affiliate transactions pursuant to the reimbursement provisions of the Partnership’s omnibus agreement. Affiliate expenses do not bear a direct relationship to affiliate revenues, and third-party expenses do not bear a direct relationship to third-party revenues. See Note 2 for further information related to contributions of assets to the Partnership by Anadarko.

Cash management. Anadarko operates a cash management system whereby excess cash from most of its subsidiaries’ separate bank accounts is generally swept to centralized accounts. Prior to the Partnership’s acquisition of the Partnership assets, third-party sales and purchases related to such assets were received or paid in cash by Anadarko within its centralized cash management system. The outstanding affiliate balances were entirely settled through an adjustment to net investment by Anadarko in connection with the acquisition of the Partnership assets. Subsequent to the acquisition of Partnership assets from Anadarko, transactions related to such assets are cash-settled directly with third parties and with Anadarko affiliates. Chipeta cash settles its transactions directly with third parties and Anadarko, as well as with the other subsidiaries of the Partnership.

Note receivable - Anadarko. Concurrently with the closing of the Partnership’s May 2008 initial public offering, the Partnership loaned $260.0 million to Anadarko in exchange for a 30-year note bearing interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.50% , payable quarterly. The fair value of the note receivable from Anadarko was $325.2 million and $313.3 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. The fair value of the note reflects consideration of credit risk and any premium or discount for the differential between the stated interest rate and quarter-end market interest rate, based on quoted market prices of similar debt instruments. Accordingly, the fair value of the note receivable from Anadarko is measured using Level 2 inputs.

Commodity price swap agreements. The Partnership has commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko to mitigate exposure to a majority of the commodity price risk inherent in its percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts. Notional volumes for each of the commodity price swap agreements are not specifically defined. Instead, the commodity price swap agreements apply to the actual volume of natural gas, condensate and NGLs purchased and sold. The commodity price swap agreements do not satisfy the definition of a derivative financial instrument and, therefore, are not required to be measured at fair value.


137

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)

The following table summarizes gains and losses upon settlement of commodity price swap agreements recognized in the consolidated statements of operations:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Gains (losses) on commodity price swap agreements related to sales: (1)
 

 
 
 
 
Natural gas sales
 
$
19,924

 
$
11,116

 
$
45,978

Natural gas liquids sales
 
(21,722
)
 
59,918

 
145,258

Total
 
(1,798
)
 
71,034

 
191,236

Gains (losses) on commodity price swap agreements related to purchases (2)
 
2,446

 
(42,577
)
 
(124,944
)
Net gains (losses) on commodity price swap agreements
 
$
648

 
$
28,457

 
$
66,292

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Reported in affiliate Natural gas and natural gas liquids sales in the consolidated statements of operations in the period in which the related sale is recorded.
(2)  
Reported in Cost of product in the consolidated statements of operations in the period in which the related purchase is recorded.

Swap agreements - DJ Basin complex, Hugoton system and MGR assets. On June 25, 2015, the Partnership extended its commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko for the DJ Basin complex from July 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015, and for the Hugoton system from October 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015. On December 8, 2015, the commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko for the DJ Basin complex and Hugoton system were extended from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. On December 1, 2016, the commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko for the DJ Basin complex and the MGR assets were extended from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. On December 20, 2017 , the commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko for the DJ Basin complex and the MGR assets were extended from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018.
Revenues or costs attributable to volumes settled during the respective extension period, at the applicable market price in the tables below, are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. The Partnership also records a capital contribution from Anadarko in the Partnership’s consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital for an amount equal to (i) the amount by which the swap price recognized as revenue exceeds the applicable market price in the tables below, minus (ii) the amount by which the swap price recognized as cost of product exceeds the market price in the tables below. For the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , the capital contributions from Anadarko were $58.6 million , $45.8 million and $18.4 million , respectively. The tables below summarize the swap prices for the extension periods compared to the forward market prices as of the various agreement dates.
 
 
DJ Basin Complex
per barrel except natural gas
 
2015 - 2018
Swap Prices
 
 2015 Market Prices (1)
 
 2016 Market Prices   (1)
 
2017 Market Prices (1)
 
2018 Market Prices (1)
Ethane
 
$
18.41

 
$
1.96

 
$
0.60

 
$
5.09

 
$
5.41

Propane
 
47.08

 
13.10

 
10.98

 
18.85

 
28.72

Isobutane
 
62.09

 
19.75

 
17.23

 
26.83

 
32.92

Normal butane
 
54.62

 
18.99

 
16.86

 
26.20

 
32.71

Natural gasoline
 
72.88

 
52.59

 
26.15

 
41.84

 
48.04

Condensate
 
76.47

 
52.59

 
34.65

 
45.40

 
49.36

Natural gas (per MMBtu)
 
5.96

 
2.75

 
2.11

 
3.05

 
2.21



138

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)
 
 
Hugoton System (2)
per barrel except natural gas
 
2015 - 2016 Swap Prices
 
 2015 Market Prices (1)
 
2016 Market Prices (1)
Condensate
 
$
78.61

 
$
32.56

 
$
18.81

Natural gas (per MMBtu)
 
5.50

 
2.74

 
2.12

 
 
MGR Assets
per barrel except natural gas
 
2015 Swap Prices
 
2016 - 2018 Swap Prices
 
2017 Market Prices (1)
 
2018 Market Prices (1)
Ethane
 
$
23.41

 
$
23.11

 
$
4.08

 
$
2.52

Propane
 
52.99

 
52.90

 
19.24

 
25.83

Isobutane
 
74.02

 
73.89

 
25.79

 
30.03

Normal butane
 
65.04

 
64.93

 
25.16

 
29.82

Natural gasoline
 
81.82

 
81.68

 
45.01

 
47.25

Condensate
 
81.82

 
81.68

 
53.55

 
56.76

Natural gas (per MMBtu)
 
4.66

 
4.87

 
3.05

 
2.21

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Represents the New York Mercantile Exchange forward strip price as of June 25, 2015, December 8, 2015, December 1, 2016, and December 20, 2017 , for the 2015 Market Prices, 2016 Market Prices, 2017 Market Prices, and 2018 Market Prices, respectively, adjusted for product specification, location, basis and, in the case of NGLs, transportation and fractionation costs.
(2)  
The Hugoton system was sold in October 2016. See Note 2 .

Gathering and processing agreements. The Partnership has significant gathering and processing arrangements with affiliates of Anadarko on a majority of its systems. The Partnership’s natural gas gathering, treating and transportation throughput (excluding equity investment throughput) attributable to production owned or controlled by Anadarko was 34% , 37% and 53% for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. The Partnership’s natural gas processing throughput (excluding equity investment throughput) attributable to production owned or controlled by Anadarko was 41% , 54% and 51% for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. The Partnership’s crude oil, NGL and produced water gathering, treating, transportation and disposal throughput (excluding equity investment throughput) attributable to production owned or controlled by Anadarko was 56% , 65% , and 100% for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. Prior to January 1, 2016, Springfield’s contracts were with a subsidiary of Anadarko who contracted with third parties. Effective January 1, 2016, Springfield’s contracts are with both a subsidiary of Anadarko and third parties directly.

Commodity purchase and sale agreements. The Partnership sells a significant amount of its natural gas, condensate and NGLs to Anadarko Energy Services Company (“AESC”), Anadarko’s marketing affiliate. In addition, the Partnership purchases natural gas, condensate and NGLs from AESC pursuant to purchase agreements. The Partnership’s purchase and sale agreements with AESC are generally one-year contracts, subject to annual renewal.

Acquisitions from Anadarko. On March 14, 2016, the Partnership acquired Springfield from Anadarko, and on March 2, 2015, the Partnership acquired DBJV from Anadarko. (see Note 2 ).


139

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)

Omnibus agreement. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, Anadarko performs centralized corporate functions for the Partnership, such as legal; accounting; treasury; cash management; investor relations; insurance administration and claims processing; risk management; health, safety and environmental; information technology; human resources; credit; payroll; internal audit; tax; marketing; and midstream administration. Anadarko, in accordance with the partnership and omnibus agreements, determines, in its reasonable discretion, amounts to be reimbursed by the Partnership in exchange for services provided under the omnibus agreement. See Summary of affiliate transactions below.
The following table summarizes the amounts the Partnership reimbursed to Anadarko:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
General and administrative expenses
 
$
31,733

 
$
29,360

 
$
22,896

Public company expenses
 
9,379

 
8,410

 
8,950

Total reimbursement
 
$
41,112

 
$
37,770

 
$
31,846


Services and secondment agreement. Pursuant to the services and secondment agreement, specified employees of Anadarko are seconded to the general partner to provide operating, routine maintenance and other services with respect to the assets owned and operated by the Partnership under the direction, supervision and control of the general partner. Pursuant to the services and secondment agreement, the Partnership reimburses Anadarko for services provided by the seconded employees. The initial term of the services and secondment agreement extends through May 2018 and the term will automatically extend for additional twelve-month periods unless either party provides 180 days written notice of termination before the applicable twelve-month period expires. The consolidated financial statements include costs allocated by Anadarko for expenses incurred under the services and secondment agreement for periods including and subsequent to the Partnership’s acquisition of the Partnership assets.

Tax sharing agreement. Pursuant to a tax sharing agreement, the Partnership reimburses Anadarko for its estimated share of taxes from all forms of taxation, excluding taxes imposed by the United States. Taxes for which the Partnership reimburses Anadarko include state taxes attributable to the Partnership’s income, which are directly borne by Anadarko through its filing of a combined or consolidated tax return with respect to periods beginning on and subsequent to the acquisition of the Partnership assets from Anadarko. Anadarko may use its own tax attributes to reduce or eliminate the tax liability of its combined or consolidated group, which may include the Partnership as a member. However, under this circumstance, the Partnership nevertheless is required to reimburse Anadarko for its allocable share of taxes that would have been owed had tax attributes not been available to Anadarko.

Allocation of costs. For periods prior to the Partnership’s acquisition of the Partnership assets, the consolidated financial statements include costs allocated by Anadarko in the form of a management services fee, which approximated the general and administrative costs incurred by Anadarko attributable to the Partnership assets. This management services fee was allocated to the Partnership based on its proportionate share of Anadarko’s assets and revenues or other contractual arrangements. Management believes these allocation methodologies are reasonable.
The employees supporting the Partnership’s operations are employees of Anadarko. Anadarko allocates costs to the Partnership for its share of personnel costs, including costs associated with equity-based compensation plans, non-contributory defined pension and postretirement plans and defined contribution savings plans pursuant to the omnibus agreement and services and secondment agreement. In general, the Partnership’s reimbursement to Anadarko under the omnibus agreement or services and secondment agreements is either (i) on an actual basis for direct expenses Anadarko and the general partner incur on behalf of the Partnership, or (ii) based on an allocation of salaries and related employee benefits between the Partnership, the general partner and Anadarko based on estimates of time spent on each entity’s business and affairs. Most general and administrative expenses charged to the Partnership by Anadarko are attributed to the Partnership on an actual basis, and do not include any mark-up or subsidy component. With respect to allocated costs, management believes the allocation method employed by Anadarko is reasonable. Although it is not practicable to determine what the amount of these direct and allocated costs would be if the Partnership were to directly obtain these services, management believes that aggregate costs charged to the Partnership by Anadarko are reasonable.


140

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)

WES LTIP. The general partner awards phantom units under the WES LTIP primarily to its independent directors, but also from time to time to its executive officers and Anadarko employees performing services for the Partnership. The phantom units awarded to the independent directors vest one year from the grant date, while all other awards are subject to graded vesting over a three -year service period. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period and was $0.4 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 , and $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 . As of December 31, 2017 , there was $0.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense attributable to the outstanding awards under the WES LTIP, all of which will be realized by the Partnership, and which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.4 years.
The following table summarizes WES LTIP award activity for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 :
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
 
Units
 
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
 
Units
 
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
 
Units
Phantom units outstanding at beginning of year
 
$
49.30

 
7,304

 
$
68.78

 
5,477

 
$
60.74

 
9,522

Vested
 
49.30

 
(7,304
)
 
68.78

 
(5,477
)
 
60.69

 
(9,257
)
Granted
 
55.73

 
7,180

 
49.30

 
7,304

 
69.10

 
5,212

Phantom units outstanding at end of year
 
55.73

 
7,180

 
49.30

 
7,304

 
68.78

 
5,477


WGP LTIP and Anadarko Incentive Plans. For the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , general and administrative expenses included $4.6 million , $5.2 million and $3.9 million , respectively, of equity-based compensation expense, allocated to the Partnership by Anadarko, for awards granted to the executive officers of the general partner and other employees under the WGP LTIP and the Anadarko Incentive Plans. Of these amounts, $4.6 million , $4.2 million and $3.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively, are reflected as contributions to partners’ capital in the Partnership’s consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital. As of December 31, 2017 , the Partnership estimated that $13.2 million of estimated unrecognized compensation expense attributable to the Anadarko Incentive Plans will be allocated to the Partnership over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years.

Equipment purchases and sales. The following table summarizes the Partnership’s purchases from and sales to Anadarko of pipe and equipment:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
thousands
 
Purchases
 
Sales
Cash consideration
 
$
3,910

 
$
3,965

 
$
10,903

 
$

 
$
623

 
$
925

Net carrying value
 
(5,283
)
 
(3,366
)
 
(6,318
)
 

 
(605
)
 
(972
)
Partners’ capital adjustment
 
$
(1,373
)
 
$
599

 
$
4,585

 
$

 
$
18

 
$
(47
)

Contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates. On certain of the Partnership’s capital projects, Anadarko is obligated to reimburse the Partnership for all or a portion of project capital expenditures. The majority of such arrangements are associated with projects related to pipeline construction activities and production well tie-ins. The cash receipts resulting from such reimbursements are presented as “Contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates” within the investing section of the Partnership’s consolidated statements of cash flows. See Accounting standards adopted in 2018 in Note 1 for a discussion of the expected impact the adoption of Topic 606 will have on future aid in construction costs.


141

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)

Summary of affiliate transactions. The following table summarizes material affiliate transactions. See Note 2 for discussion of affiliate acquisitions and related funding.
 
 
Year ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues and other (1)
 
$
1,365,318

 
$
1,228,232

 
$
1,220,639

Equity income, net   – affiliates (1)
 
85,194

 
78,717

 
71,251

Cost of product (1)
 
86,010

 
80,455

 
167,354

Operation and maintenance (2)
 
72,489

 
72,330

 
77,061

General and administrative (3)
 
39,130

 
38,066

 
33,903

Operating expenses
 
197,629

 
190,851

 
278,318

Interest income (4)
 
16,900

 
16,900

 
16,900

Interest expense (5)
 
71

 
(7,747
)
 
14,398

Settlement of the Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (6)
 
(37,346
)
 

 

Proceeds from the issuance of common units, net of offering expenses (7)
 

 
25,000

 

Distributions to unitholders (8)
 
452,777

 
382,711

 
314,200

Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko
 
58,551

 
45,820

 
18,449

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Represents amounts earned or incurred on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of Partnership assets, as well as amounts earned or incurred by Anadarko on a historical basis related to the Partnership assets prior to the acquisition of such assets, recognized under gathering, treating or processing agreements, and purchase and sale agreements.
(2)  
Represents expenses incurred on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of Partnership assets, as well as expenses incurred by Anadarko on a historical basis related to the Partnership assets prior to the acquisition of such assets.
(3)  
Represents general and administrative expense incurred on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of Partnership assets, as well as a management services fee for reimbursement of expenses incurred by Anadarko for periods prior to the acquisition of the Partnership assets by the Partnership. These amounts include equity-based compensation expense allocated to the Partnership by Anadarko (see WES LTIP and WGP LTIP and Anadarko Incentive Plans within this Note 5 ).
(4)  
Represents interest income recognized on the note receivable from Anadarko.
(5)  
Includes amounts related to the Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko (see Note 2 and Note 12 ).
(6)  
Represents the cash payment to Anadarko for the settlement of the Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko (see Note 2 ).
(7)  
Represents proceeds from the issuance of 835,841 common units to WGP as partial funding for the acquisition of Springfield (see Note 2 ).
(8)  
Represents distributions paid under the partnership agreement (see Note 3 and Note 4 ).

Concentration of credit risk. Anadarko was the only customer from whom revenues exceeded 10% of the Partnership’s consolidated revenues for all periods presented in the consolidated statements of operations.


142

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6.  INCOME TAXES

The components of the Partnership’s income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Current income tax expense (benefit)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
 
$

 
$
4,477

 
$
32,422

State income tax expense (benefit)
 
2,408

 
1,340

 
1,764

Total current income tax expense (benefit)
 
2,408

 
5,817

 
34,186

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
 

 
1,622

 
10,251

State income tax expense (benefit)
 
2,458

 
933

 
1,095

Total deferred income tax expense (benefit)
 
2,458

 
2,555

 
11,346

Total income tax expense (benefit)
 
$
4,866

 
$
8,372

 
$
45,532


Total income taxes differed from the amounts computed by applying the statutory income tax rate to income (loss) before income taxes. The sources of these differences are as follows:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except percentages
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
583,084

 
$
610,666

 
$
59,739

Statutory tax rate
 
%
 
%
 
%
Tax computed at statutory rate
 
$

 
$

 
$

Adjustments resulting from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal taxes on income attributable to Partnership assets pre-acquisition
 

 
6,162

 
42,823

State taxes on income attributable to Partnership assets pre-acquisition (net of federal benefit)
 

 
117

 
298

Texas margin tax expense (benefit) (1)
 
4,866

 
2,093

 
2,411

Income tax expense (benefit)
 
$
4,866

 
$
8,372

 
$
45,532

Effective tax rate
 
1
%
 
1
%
 
76
%
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Includes a reduction of $2.2 million in deferred state income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2015. Texas House Bill 32, signed into law in June 2015, reduced the Texas margin tax rates by 0.25% . The law became effective January 1, 2016. The Partnership is required to include the impact of the law change on its deferred state income taxes in the period enacted.

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows:
 
 
December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
Depreciable property
 
$
(7,676
)
 
$
(4,976
)
Credit carryforwards
 
448

 
498

Other intangible assets
 
(189
)
 
(1,928
)
Other
 
8

 
4

Net long-term deferred income tax liabilities
 
$
(7,409
)
 
$
(6,402
)

Credit carryforwards, which are available for use on future income tax returns, consist of $0.4 million of state income tax credits that expire in 2026.

143

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7.  PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

A summary of the historical cost of property, plant and equipment is as follows:
 
 
 
 
December 31,
thousands
 
Estimated Useful Life
 
2017
 
2016
Land
 
n/a
 
$
4,450

 
$
4,012

Gathering systems and processing complexes
 
3 to 47 years
 
7,114,701

 
6,462,053

Pipelines and equipment
 
15 to 45 years
 
137,644

 
139,646

Assets under construction
 
n/a
 
577,914

 
226,626

Other
 
3 to 40 years
 
36,393

 
29,605

Total property, plant and equipment
 
 
 
7,871,102

 
6,861,942

Accumulated depreciation
 
 
 
2,140,211

 
1,812,010

Net property, plant and equipment
 
 
 
$
5,730,891

 
$
5,049,932


The cost of property classified as “Assets under construction” is excluded from capitalized costs being depreciated. These amounts represent property that is not yet suitable to be placed into productive service as of the respective balance sheet date.

Impairments. During 2017, the Partnership recognized impairments of $178.4 million , including an impairment of $158.8 million at the Granger complex, which was impaired to its estimated fair value of $48.5 million using the income approach and Level 3 fair value inputs, due to a reduced throughput fee as a result of a producer’s bankruptcy. The remaining $19.6 million of impairments was primarily related to (i) an $8.2 million impairment due to the cancellation of a plant project at the Hilight system, (ii) a $3.7 million impairment at the Granger straddle plant, which was impaired to its estimated salvage value of $0.6 million using the income approach and Level 3 fair value inputs, (iii) a $3.1 million impairment of the Fort Union equity investment (see Note 9 ), (iv) a $2.0 million impairment of an idle facility in northeast Wyoming, which was impaired to its estimated salvage value of $0.4 million using the market approach and Level 3 fair value inputs, and (v) the cancellation of a pipeline project in West Texas.
During 2016, the Partnership recognized impairments of $15.5 million , including an impairment of $6.1 million at the Newcastle system, which was impaired to its estimated fair value of $3.1 million using the income approach and Level 3 fair value inputs, due to a reduction in estimated future cash flows caused by the low commodity price environment. Also during 2016, the Partnership recognized impairments of $9.4 million , primarily related to the cancellation of projects at the DJ Basin complex and Springfield and DBJV systems, and the abandonment of compressors at the MIGC system.
During 2015, the Partnership recognized impairments of $515.5 million , primarily due to impairments of $280.2 million at the Red Desert complex and $220.9 million at the Hilight system. Using the income approach and Level 3 fair value inputs, the Red Desert complex was impaired to its estimated salvage value of $6.3 million and the Hilight system was impaired to its estimated fair value of $28.8 million . These impairments were triggered by a reduction in estimated future cash flows caused by the low commodity price environment and resulting reduced producer drilling activity and related throughput. Also during 2015, the Partnership recognized impairments of $14.4 million , primarily due to (i) the abandonment of compressors at the MIGC system and (ii) the cancellation of projects at the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest systems and the Brasada, Red Desert and DJ Basin complexes.


144

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

8.  GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES

Goodwill. Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price of a business acquired exceeds the fair market value of the tangible and separately measurable intangible net assets. In addition, goodwill represents the allocated portion of Anadarko’s midstream goodwill attributed to the Partnership assets acquired from Anadarko. The carrying value of Anadarko’s midstream goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid to a third-party entity over the estimated fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed by Anadarko. Accordingly, the Partnership’s allocated goodwill balance does not represent, and in some cases is significantly different from, the difference between the consideration the Partnership paid for its acquisitions from Anadarko and the fair value of such net assets on their respective acquisition dates.
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually (see Note 1 ). Estimating the fair value of the reporting units was not necessary based on the qualitative evaluation as of October 1, 2017 , and no goodwill impairment has been recognized in these consolidated financial statements. Qualitative factors were also assessed in the fourth quarter of 2017 to review any changes in circumstances subsequent to the annual test, including changes in commodity prices. This assessment also indicated no impairment.

Other intangible assets. The intangible asset balance on the consolidated balance sheets includes the fair value, net of amortization, of (i) contracts assumed by the Partnership in connection with the Platte Valley acquisition in February 2011, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 50 years , (ii) interconnect agreements at Chipeta entered into in November 2012, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 10 years , and (iii) contracts assumed by the Partnership in connection with the DBM acquisition in November 2014, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 30 years .
The Partnership assesses intangible assets for impairment together with related underlying long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. See Property, plant and equipment in Note 1 for further discussion of management’s process to evaluate potential impairment of long-lived assets. No intangible asset impairment has been recognized in these consolidated financial statements.
The following table presents the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of other intangible assets:
 
 
December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
Gross carrying amount
 
$
868,035

 
$
868,035

Accumulated amortization
 
(92,766
)
 
(64,337
)
Other intangible assets
 
$
775,269

 
$
803,698


Amortization expense for intangible assets was $28.4 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 , and $28.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 . An estimated $28.4 million of intangible asset amortization will be recorded for each of the next five years.


145

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

9.  EQUITY INVESTMENTS

The following table presents the activity in the Partnership’s equity investments for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 
 
Equity Investments
thousands
 
Fort
Union
(1)
 
White
Cliffs
(2)
 
Rendezvous (3)
 
Mont
Belvieu JV
(4)
 
TEG (5)
 
TEP (6)
 
FRP (7)
 
Total
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
$
17,122

 
$
50,439

 
$
50,913

 
$
117,089

 
$
16,283

 
$
194,803

 
$
172,238

 
$
618,887

Investment earnings (loss), net of amortization
 
608

 
13,858

 
1,931

 
26,204

 
708

 
16,683

 
18,725

 
78,717

Contributions
 

 
441

 

 

 
166

 
(580
)
 

 
27

Distributions
 
(1,543
)
 
(13,277
)
 
(3,873
)
 
(26,243
)
 
(730
)
 
(16,934
)
 
(19,585
)
 
(82,185
)
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings (8)
 
(3,354
)
 
(4,142
)
 
(2,232
)
 
(4,245
)
 
(581
)
 
(4,778
)
 
(1,906
)
 
(21,238
)
Balance at December 31, 2016
 
$
12,833

 
$
47,319

 
$
46,739

 
$
112,805

 
$
15,846

 
$
189,194

 
$
169,472

 
$
594,208

Investment earnings (loss), net of amortization
 
3,821

 
12,547

 
1,144

 
29,444

 
3,350

 
17,387

 
17,501

 
85,194

Impairment expense  (9)
 
(3,110
)
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(3,110
)
Contributions
 

 
277

 

 

 

 
107

 

 
384

Distributions
 
(4,217
)
 
(11,965
)
 
(3,085
)
 
(29,482
)
 
(3,317
)
 
(17,639
)
 
(17,675
)
 
(87,380
)
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings (8)
 
(2,297
)
 
(3,233
)
 
(2,270
)
 
(2,468
)
 

 
(10,074
)
 
(2,743
)
 
(23,085
)
Balance at December 31, 2017
 
$
7,030

 
$
44,945

 
$
42,528

 
$
110,299

 
$
15,879

 
$
178,975

 
$
166,555

 
$
566,211

                                                                                                                                                                                   
(1)  
The Partnership has a 14.81% interest in Fort Union, a joint venture that owns a gathering pipeline and treating facilities in the Powder River Basin. Anadarko is the construction manager and physical operator of the Fort Union facilities. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, decisions with respect to significant expenditures or contractual commitments, annual budgets, material financings, dispositions of assets or amending the owners’ firm gathering agreements, require 65% or unanimous approval of the owners.
(2)  
The Partnership has a 10% interest in White Cliffs, a limited liability company that owns a crude oil pipeline that originates in Platteville, Colorado and terminates in Cushing, Oklahoma. The third-party majority owner is the manager of the White Cliffs operations. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, approval of annual budgets and decisions with respect to significant expenditures, contractual commitments, acquisitions, material financings, dispositions of assets or admitting new members, require more than 75% approval of the members.
(3)  
The Partnership has a 22% interest in Rendezvous, a limited liability company that operates gas gathering facilities in Southwestern Wyoming. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, decisions with respect to significant expenditures or contractual commitments, annual budgets, material financings, dispositions of assets or amending the members’ gas servicing agreements, require unanimous approval of the members.
(4)  
The Partnership has a 25% interest in the Mont Belvieu JV, an entity formed to design, construct, and own two fractionation trains located in Mont Belvieu, Texas. A third party is the operator of the Mont Belvieu JV fractionation trains. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, decisions with respect to the execution of contracts, settlements, disposition of assets, or the creation, appointment, or removal of officer positions require 50% or unanimous approval of the owners.
(5)  
The Partnership has a 20% interest in TEG, which owns two NGL gathering systems that link natural gas processing plants to TEP. Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Enbridge, Inc., is the operator of the two gathering systems. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, decisions with respect to the execution of contracts, settlements, disposition of assets, or the delegation, creation, appointment, or removal of officer positions require more than 50% approval of the members.
(6)  
The Partnership has a 20% interest in TEP, which owns an NGL pipeline that originates in Skellytown, Texas and extends to Mont Belvieu, Texas. Enterprise Products Operating LLC (“Enterprise”) is the operator of TEP. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, decisions with respect to the execution of contracts, settlements, disposition of assets, or the creation, appointment, or removal of officer positions require more than 50% approval of the members.
(7)  
The Partnership has a 33.33% interest in FRP, which owns an NGL pipeline that extends from Weld County, Colorado to Skellytown, Texas. Enterprise is the operator of FRP. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, decisions with respect to the execution of contracts, settlements, disposition of assets, or the creation, appointment, or removal of officer positions require more than 50% approval of the members.
(8)  
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings, classified as investing cash flows in the consolidated statements of cash flows, are calculated on an individual investment basis.
(9)  
Recorded in Impairments in the consolidated statements of operations.


146

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

9.  EQUITY INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED)

The investment balance in Fort Union at December 31, 2017 , is $3.1 million less than the Partnership’s underlying equity in Fort Union’s net assets due to an impairment loss recognized by the Partnership in the second quarter of 2017 for its investment in Fort Union. This investment was impaired to its estimated fair value of $8.5 million , using the income approach and Level 3 fair value inputs.
The investment balance in Rendezvous at December 31, 2017 , includes $36.2 million for the purchase price allocated to the investment in Rendezvous in excess of the historic cost basis of Western Gas Resources, Inc. (“WGRI”), the entity that previously owned the interest in Rendezvous, which Anadarko acquired in August 2006. This excess balance is attributable to the difference between the fair value and book value of such gathering and treating facilities (at the time WGRI was acquired by Anadarko) and is being amortized over the remaining estimated useful life of those facilities.
The investment balance in White Cliffs at December 31, 2017 , is $6.9 million less than the Partnership’s underlying equity in White Cliffs’ net assets, primarily due to the Partnership recording the acquisition of its initial 0.4% interest in White Cliffs at Anadarko’s historic carrying value. This difference is being amortized to Equity income, net – affiliates over the remaining estimated useful life of the White Cliffs pipeline.
An impairment loss was recognized by the operator of Fort Union during both the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. The Partnership’s 14.81% share of the impairment loss was $3.0 million and $9.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, recorded in Equity income, net – affiliates in the consolidated statements of operations.
Management evaluates its equity investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such investments may have experienced a decline in value that is other than temporary. When evidence of loss in value has occurred, management compares the estimated fair value of the investment to the carrying value of the investment to determine whether the investment has been impaired. Management assesses the fair value of equity investments using commonly accepted techniques, and may use more than one method, including, but not limited to, recent third-party comparable sales and discounted cash flow models. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value, the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.
The following tables present the summarized combined financial information for the Partnership’s equity investments (amounts represent 100% of investee financial information):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Consolidated Statements of Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
 
$
703,424

 
$
687,554

 
$
667,554

Operating income
 
435,735

 
428,454

 
359,899

Net income
 
434,749

 
427,511

 
359,443


 
 
December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 
 
 
Current assets
 
$
137,957

 
$
118,472

Property, plant and equipment, net
 
2,512,214

 
2,626,466

Other assets
 
36,373

 
39,802

Total assets
 
$
2,686,544

 
$
2,784,740

Current liabilities
 
80,490

 
63,468

Non-current liabilities
 
7,447

 
6,662

Equity
 
2,598,607

 
2,714,610

Total liabilities and equity
 
$
2,686,544

 
$
2,784,740



147

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10.  COMPONENTS OF WORKING CAPITAL

A summary of accounts receivable, net is as follows:
 
 
December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
Trade receivables, net
 
$
160,387

 
$
192,808

Other receivables, net
 
45

 
30,415

Total accounts receivable, net
 
$
160,432

 
$
223,223


A summary of other current assets is as follows:
 
 
December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
Natural gas liquids inventory
 
$
10,788

 
$
7,126

Imbalance receivables
 
1,640

 
3,483

Prepaid insurance
 
2,388

 
2,257

Total other current assets
 
$
14,816

 
$
12,866


A summary of accrued liabilities is as follows:
 
 
December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
Accrued interest expense
 
$
40,632

 
$
39,826

Short-term asset retirement obligations
 
2,304

 
3,114

Short-term remediation and reclamation obligations
 
833

 
630

Income taxes payable
 
2,495

 
1,006

Other
 
1,635

 
532

Total accrued liabilities
 
$
47,899

 
$
45,108



148

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11.  ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

The following table provides a summary of changes in asset retirement obligations:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
Carrying amount of asset retirement obligations at beginning of year
 
$
142,407

 
$
130,631

Liabilities incurred
 
16,153

 
5,515

Liabilities settled
 
(10,468
)
 
(10,650
)
Accretion expense
 
6,956

 
6,794

Revisions in estimated liabilities
 
(9,350
)
 
10,117

Carrying amount of asset retirement obligations at end of year
 
$
145,698

 
$
142,407


The liabilities incurred for the year ended December 31, 2017 , represented additions in asset retirement obligations primarily due to (i) capital expansions at the DJ Basin and DBM complexes and the DBJV system, (ii) the Property Exchange in March 2017 and (iii) the start-up of the DBM water systems in 2017. Revisions in estimated liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2017 , were related to (i) changes in expected settlement costs and timing primarily at the Hilight system and the DJ Basin and DBM complexes, and (ii) changes in property lives primarily at the Granger, DJ Basin and DBM complexes and the Hilight and DBJV systems.
The liabilities incurred for the year ended December 31, 2016 , represented additions in asset retirement obligations primarily due to capital expansions at the DJ Basin and DBM complexes and the DBJV system. Revisions in estimated liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2016 , were related to (i) changes in expected settlement costs and timing primarily at the MGR assets, Granger complex and the Hilight and Springfield systems, and (ii) changes in property lives primarily at the DJ Basin and DBM complexes and the Hilight, Springfield and Haley systems.

12.  DEBT AND INTEREST EXPENSE

At December 31, 2017 , the Partnership’s debt consisted of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “2021 Notes”), 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “2022 Notes”), 2.600% Senior Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”), 5.450% Senior Notes due 2044 (the “2044 Notes”), 3.950% Senior Notes due 2025 (the “2025 Notes”), 4.650% Senior Notes due 2026 (the “2026 Notes”) and borrowings on the RCF.
The following table presents the Partnership’s outstanding debt as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
thousands
 
Principal
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value   (1)
 
Principal
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value (1)
2021 Notes
 
$
500,000

 
$
495,815

 
$
530,647

 
$
500,000

 
$
494,734

 
$
536,252

2022 Notes
 
670,000

 
668,849

 
684,043

 
670,000

 
668,634

 
681,723

2018 Notes
 
350,000

 
349,684

 
350,631

 
350,000

 
349,188

 
351,531

2044 Notes
 
600,000

 
593,234

 
637,827

 
600,000

 
593,132

 
615,753

2025 Notes
 
500,000

 
491,885

 
500,885

 
500,000

 
490,971

 
492,499

2026 Notes
 
500,000

 
495,245

 
520,144

 
500,000

 
494,802

 
518,441

RCF
 
370,000

 
370,000

 
370,000

 

 

 

Total long-term debt
 
$
3,490,000

 
$
3,464,712

 
$
3,594,177

 
$
3,120,000

 
$
3,091,461

 
$
3,196,199

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Fair value is measured using the market approach and Level 2 inputs.


149

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12.  DEBT AND INTEREST EXPENSE (CONTINUED)

Debt activity. The following table presents the debt activity of the Partnership for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
thousands
 
Carrying Value
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
$
2,690,651

RCF borrowings
 
600,000

Issuance of 2026 Notes
 
500,000

Issuance of 2044 Notes
 
200,000

Repayments of RCF borrowings
 
(900,000
)
Other
 
810

Balance at December 31, 2016
 
$
3,091,461

RCF borrowings
 
370,000

Other
 
3,251

Balance at December 31, 2017
 
$
3,464,712


Senior Notes. The 2018 Notes, which are due in August 2018, were classified as long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017 , as the Partnership has the ability and intent to refinance these obligations using long-term debt.
In October 2016, the Partnership issued an additional $200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2044 Notes at a price to the public of 102.776% of the face amount plus accrued interest from October 1, 2016 to the settlement date. These notes were offered as additional notes under the indenture governing the 2044 Notes issued in March 2014 and are treated as a single class of securities with the 2044 Notes under such indenture. Including the effects of (i) the issuance premium for the October 2016 offering of the 2044 Notes, (ii) the issuance discount for the March 2014 offering of the 2044 Notes and (iii) the underwriting discounts, the effective interest rate of the 2044 Notes is 5.530% . Proceeds (net of underwriting discount of $1.8 million and debt issuance costs and excluding accrued interest from October 1, 2016 to the settlement date) were used to repay amounts then outstanding under the RCF and for general partnership purposes, including capital expenditures.
The 2026 Notes issued in July 2016 were offered at a price to the public of 99.796% of the face amount. Including the effects of the issuance and underwriting discounts, the effective interest rate of the 2026 Notes is 4.787% . Interest is paid semi-annually on January 1 and July 1 of each year. Proceeds (net of underwriting discount of $3.1 million , original issue discount and debt issuance costs) were used to repay a portion of the amount outstanding under the RCF.
At December 31, 2017 , the Partnership was in compliance with all covenants under the indentures governing its outstanding notes.

Revolving credit facility. The $1.2 billion RCF, which is expandable to a maximum of $1.5 billion , bears interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), plus applicable margins ranging from 0.975% to 1.45% , or an alternate base rate equal to the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.50% , or (c) LIBOR plus 1.00% , in each case plus applicable margins currently ranging from zero to 0.45% , based upon the Partnership’s senior unsecured debt rating. In December 2016, the RCF was amended to extend the maturity date from February 2019 to February 2020. The Partnership is required to pay a quarterly facility fee currently ranging from 0.15% to 0.30% of the commitment amount (whether used or unused), based upon the Partnership’s senior unsecured debt rating. The facility fee rate was 0.20% at December 31, 2017 and 2016 .
As of December 31, 2017 , the Partnership had $370.0 million of outstanding RCF borrowings and $4.6 million in outstanding letters of credit (resulting in $825.4 million available borrowing capacity), and was in compliance with all covenants under the RCF. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the interest rate on the outstanding RCF borrowings was 2.87% and 2.07% , respectively. In February 2018, the RCF was amended to extend the maturity date from February 2020 to February 2023 and expand borrowing capacity to $1.5 billion .


150

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12.  DEBT AND INTEREST EXPENSE (CONTINUED)

All notes and obligations under the RCF are recourse to the Partnership’s general partner. The Partnership’s general partner is indemnified by wholly owned subsidiaries of Anadarko against any claims made against the general partner for the Partnership’s long-term debt and/or borrowings under the RCF.

Interest expense. The following table summarizes the amounts included in interest expense:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Third parties
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term debt
 
$
(142,525
)
 
$
(121,832
)
 
$
(102,058
)
Amortization of debt issuance costs and commitment fees
 
(6,616
)
 
(6,398
)
 
(5,734
)
Capitalized interest
 
6,826

 
5,562

 
8,318

Total interest expense – third parties
 
(142,315
)
 
(122,668
)
 
(99,474
)
Affiliates
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (1)
 
(71
)
 
7,747

 
(14,398
)
Total interest expense – affiliates
 
(71
)
 
7,747

 
(14,398
)
Interest expense
 
$
(142,386
)
 
$
(114,921
)
 
$
(113,872
)
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
See Note 2 for a discussion of the Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko.

13.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Environmental obligations. The Partnership is subject to various environmental-remediation obligations arising from federal, state and local regulations regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal and other environmental matters. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the consolidated balance sheets included $1.8 million and $2.2 million , respectively, of liabilities for remediation and reclamation obligations. The current portion of these amounts is included in Accrued liabilities and the long-term portion of these amounts is included in Asset retirement obligations and other. The recorded obligations do not include any anticipated insurance recoveries. The majority of payments related to these obligations are expected to be made over the next five years. Management regularly monitors the remediation and reclamation process and the liabilities recorded and believes that the amounts reflected in the Partnership’s recorded environmental obligations are adequate to fund remedial actions to comply with present laws and regulations, and that the ultimate liability for these matters, if any, will not differ materially from recorded amounts nor materially affect the Partnership’s overall results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. There can be no assurance, however, that current regulatory requirements will not change, or past non-compliance with environmental issues will not be discovered. See Note 10 and Note 11 .


151

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

13.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

Litigation and legal proceedings. In February 2017, DBJV, at the time a 50 / 50 joint venture between a third party and the Partnership, initiated an arbitration against SWEPI LP (“SWEPI”) for breach of a 2007 gas gathering agreement between it and DBJV (the “GGA”). Specifically, DBJV seeks to collect approximately $190.0 million in gathering fees under the GGA for the period January 1, 2016 to July 1, 2017. SWEPI disputes DBJV’s calculation of the cost of service based rate and filed a counterclaim for alleged unpaid revenue associated with its condensate and for alleged overpayment of fees under the GGA for the years 2013 through 2016. Before the arbitration, SWEPI claimed that it is owed approximately $18.0 million in connection with these counterclaims. The final arbitration hearing will begin April 30, 2018, and the Partnership expects to receive a decision by the end of the third quarter in 2018. Under the terms of the Property Exchange, the Partnership’s former joint venture partner in DBJV will owe 50% of any amounts to be paid, and have a right to 50% of any amounts received, by the Partnership as a result of this arbitration proceeding. Pursuant to an agreement between the parties, if the arbitrators determine that DBJV is owed an amount of money by SWEPI for underpaid gathering fees, that amount will be paid out over five years as a supplemental gathering fee under the currently effective gas gathering agreement between the parties. Any other amounts owed by either party will be paid in cash within ninety days of the conclusion of the arbitration. The Partnership intends to vigorously prosecute its claims and vigorously defend the counterclaims asserted by SWEPI. Management does not believe the outcome of this proceeding will have a materially unfavorable effect on the Partnership’s financial condition, results of operation or cash flows.
In addition, from time to time, the Partnership is involved in legal, tax, regulatory and other proceedings in various forums regarding performance, contracts and other matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. Management is not aware of any such proceeding the final disposition of which could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Other commitments. The Partnership has short-term payment obligations, or commitments, related to its capital spending programs, as well as those of its unconsolidated affiliates, the majority of which is expected to be paid in the next twelve months. These commitments relate primarily to expansion projects at the DBJV system and the DJ Basin and DBM complexes.

Lease commitments. Anadarko, on behalf of the Partnership, has entered into lease arrangements for corporate offices, shared field offices, a warehouse and equipment supporting the Partnership’s operations, for which Anadarko charges the Partnership rent. The leases for the corporate offices and shared field offices extend through 2028 and 2033, respectively, and the lease for the warehouse expired in February 2017. Rent expense charged to the Partnership associated with these lease arrangements was $42.5 million , $35.9 million and $34.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Operating leases. The amounts in the table below represent existing contractual operating lease obligations as of December 31, 2017 , that may be assigned or otherwise charged to the Partnership pursuant to the reimbursement provisions of the omnibus agreement:
thousands
 
Operating Leases
2018
 
$
8,402

2019
 
7,506

2020
 
1,615

2021
 
460

2022
 
467

Thereafter
 
2,021

Total
 
$
20,471



152

Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
SUPPLEMENTAL QUARTERLY INFORMATION
(UNAUDITED)

The following table presents a summary of the Partnership’s operating results by quarter for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 . The Partnership’s operating results reflect the operations of the Partnership assets (as defined in Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ) from the dates of common control, unless otherwise noted. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures .
thousands except per-unit amounts
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues and other
 
$
516,193

 
$
525,450

 
$
574,695

 
$
632,018

Equity income, net – affiliates
 
19,461

 
21,728

 
21,519

 
22,486

Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net
 
119,487

 
15,458

 
72

 
(2,629
)
Proceeds from business interruption insurance claims
 
5,767

 
24,115

 

 

Operating income (loss)
 
138,392

 
207,608

 
179,456

 
181,815

Net income (loss)
 
103,991

 
175,497

 
147,913

 
150,817

Net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP
 
101,889

 
173,451

 
143,506

 
148,637

Net income (loss) per common unit – basic and diluted (1)
 
0.01

 
0.49

 
0.38

 
0.39

2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues and other
 
$
383,141

 
$
428,664

 
$
481,645

 
$
510,820

Equity income, net – affiliates
 
16,814

 
19,693

 
20,294

 
21,916

Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net
 
(632
)
 
(1,907
)
 
(6,230
)
 
(5,872
)
Proceeds from business interruption insurance claims
 

 
2,603

 
13,667

 

Operating income (loss)
 
153,403

 
176,362

 
197,288

 
181,155

Net income (loss)
 
119,083

 
167,325

 
170,426

 
145,460

Net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP
 
116,060

 
164,521

 
167,746

 
143,004

Net income (loss) per common unit – basic and diluted  (1)
 
0.31

 
0.55

 
0.54

 
0.35

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Represents net income (loss) earned on and subsequent to the date of acquisition of the Partnership assets.


153

Table of Contents

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures . The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership’s general partner (for purposes of this Item 9A, “Management”) performed an evaluation of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, Management concluded that the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017 .

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting . See Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm . See Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm under Item 8 of this Form 10-K .

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting . During the quarter ended December 31, 2017, we implemented changes to internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting for revenue as a result of the adoption of the revenue recognition standard effective January 1, 2018. The modified and new controls have been designed to address risks associated with recognizing revenue under the new standard, including modifications to accounting policies and contract review controls. There were no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2017 , that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.  Other Information

On February 15, 2018, the Partnership entered into a five-year senior unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “2018 RCF”), amending and restating the RCF, which was originally entered into in February 2014 and had an outstanding balance of $630.0 million, with $4.6 million in outstanding letters of credit, immediately prior to closing on the 2018 RCF. The aggregate initial commitments of the 2018 RCF lenders are $1.5 billion, and they are expandable to a maximum of $2.0 billion. The 2018 RCF matures on February 15, 2023, with options to extend maturity by up to two additional one year increments, and bears interest at LIBOR, plus applicable margins ranging from 1.00% to 1.50%, or an alternate base rate equal to the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.50%, or (c) LIBOR plus 1.00%, in each case plus applicable margins currently ranging from zero to 0.50%, based upon the Partnership’s senior unsecured debt rating. The Partnership is required to pay a quarterly facility fee ranging from 0.125% to 0.250% of the commitment amount (whether used or unused), also based upon its senior unsecured debt rating. The 2018 RCF contains covenants and customary events of default that are substantially similar to the RCF. As of February 16, 2018, there was $630.0 million outstanding on the 2018 RCF (with $4.6 million in outstanding letters of credit), which was drawn to repay amounts that were outstanding under the RCF. The above summary of the 2018 RCF is qualified in its entirety by reference to the 2018 RCF, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.21 hereto.


154

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Management of Western Gas Partners, LP

As an MLP, we have no directors or officers. Instead, our general partner manages our operations and activities. Our general partner is not elected by our unitholders and is not subject to re-election in the future. The directors of our general partner oversee our operations. Unitholders are not entitled to elect the directors of our general partner or directly or indirectly participate in our management or operations. However, our general partner owes duties to our unitholders as defined and described in our partnership agreement. Our general partner will be liable, as general partner, for all of our debts (to the extent not paid from our assets), except for indebtedness or other obligations that are made specifically nonrecourse to it. Our general partner, therefore, may cause us to incur indebtedness or other obligations that are nonrecourse to it.
Our Board of Directors has eight members, four of whom are independent as defined under the independence standards established by the NYSE and the Exchange Act. The NYSE does not require a listed limited partnership, such as us, to have a majority of independent directors on the Board of Directors or to establish a compensation committee or a nominating committee. Our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Steven D. Arnold, Milton Carroll, James R. Crane and David J. Tudor are independent as described in the rules of the NYSE and the Exchange Act. With respect to Mr. Crane, the Board specifically considered the transactions described under Part III, Item 13 of this Form 10-K, as well as payments by Anadarko to a company affiliated with Mr. Crane and a contribution made by Anadarko to a charitable institution affiliated with Mr. Crane. The Board determined that such transactions do not impact Mr. Crane’s independence. With respect to Mr. Arnold, the Board specifically considered that Mr. Arnold holds 4,900 shares of Anadarko stock. The Board determined that the ownership of these shares does not impact Mr. Arnold’s independence. With respect to Mr. Carroll, the Board specifically considered that he is the Executive Chairman of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (“CenterPoint”), with which Anadarko entered into approximately $26.1 million in gas purchase and sale transactions during 2017 . These transactions represent an immaterial amount of both Anadarko and CenterPoint revenues and were on standard terms, negotiated without any involvement from Mr. Carroll. Accordingly, the Board determined that such transactions do not impact Mr. Carroll’s independence.
The executive officers of our general partner manage and conduct our day-to-day operations. The executive officers of our general partner allocate their time between managing our business and affairs and the business and affairs of Anadarko, and may face a conflict regarding the allocation of their time. We expect that the amount of time the executive officers of our general partner devote to our business may increase or decrease in future periods as our business continues to develop. The executive officers of our general partner and other Anadarko employees operate our business and provide us with general and administrative services pursuant to the omnibus agreement and the services and secondment agreement described under Part III, Item 13 of this Form 10-K. We reimburse Anadarko for certain allocated expenses of operational personnel who perform services for our benefit, and for certain direct expenses.

Board Leadership Structure

Through its ownership and control of WGP GP, Anadarko controls our general partner and, within the limitations of our partnership agreement and applicable SEC and NYSE rules and regulations, also exercises broad discretion in establishing the governance provisions of our general partner’s limited liability company agreement. Accordingly, our general partner’s board structure is established by Anadarko.
Although our general partner’s current board structure has separated the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), our general partner’s limited liability company agreement and Corporate Governance Guidelines permit the roles of Chairman and CEO to be combined. Anadarko may in the future combine those roles at its discretion.


155

Table of Contents

Directors and Executive Officers

The biography of each director below contains information regarding that person’s service as a director, business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, and involvement in certain legal or administrative proceedings, if applicable, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused our general partner and its Board of Directors to determine that the person should serve as a director of our general partner. In light of our strategic relationship with our sponsor, Anadarko, our general partner considers service as an Anadarko executive to be a meaningful qualification for service as a non-independent director of our general partner.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the directors and executive officers of our general partner as of February 12, 2018 . Directors are appointed for a term of one year.
Name
 
Age
 
Position with Western Gas Holdings, LLC
Robert G. Gwin
 
54

 
Chairman of the Board
Donald R. Sinclair
 
60

 
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (through February 12, 2017)
Benjamin M. Fink
 
47

 
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Jaime R. Casas
 
47

 
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Craig W. Collins
 
45

 
Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Philip H. Peacock
 
46

 
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Steven D. Arnold
 
57

 
Director
Daniel E. Brown
 
42

 
Director
Milton Carroll
 
67

 
Director
James R. Crane
 
64

 
Director
Darrell E. Hollek
 
60

 
Director (through December 31, 2017)
Robert K. Reeves
 
60

 
Director
David J. Tudor
 
58

 
Director

Our directors hold office until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until the earlier of their death, resignation, removal or disqualification. Officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Robert G. Gwin
Age: 54
Houston, Texas
Director since:
August 2007
Not Independent
Officer from:
August 2007 to January 2010
Biography/Qualifications
 
Robert G. Gwin has served as a director of our general partner since 2007 and has served as Chairman of the Board of our general partner since 2009. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of our general partner from 2007 to 2010 and as President from 2007 to 2009. Mr. Gwin has also served as Chairman of the Board of WGP GP since September 2012. He was named Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Anadarko in May 2013 and previously served as Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer beginning in 2009. Mr. Gwin has also served as Chairman of the Board of LyondellBasell Industries N.V. since August 2013 and as a director since 2011.
 
 
Donald R. Sinclair
Age: 60
Houston, Texas
Director from:
October 2009 to February 2017
Not Independent
Officer from:
October 2009 to February 2017
Biography/Qualifications
 
From 2010 until his retirement in February 2017, Mr. Sinclair served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of our general partner and from 2009 to 2010, he served as President and a director. From September 2012 to February 2017, Mr. Sinclair also served as the President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of WGP GP. From May 2013 to February 2017, he served as Senior Vice President of Anadarko, prior to which he served as a Vice President of Anadarko beginning in 2010. Prior to joining Anadarko and becoming President and a director of our general partner, Mr. Sinclair was a founding partner and served as President of Ceritas Energy, LLC, a midstream energy company headquartered in Houston with operations in Texas, Wyoming and Utah from 2003 to 2009. Mr. Sinclair has worked in the oil and gas industry for over 35 years, with a focus on marketing and trading and the midstream sector.
 
 

156

Table of Contents

Benjamin M. Fink
Age: 47
Houston, Texas
Director since:
February 2017
Not Independent
Officer since:
2009
Biography/Qualifications

Benjamin M. Fink has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of our general partner and WGP GP since May 2017 and as a director since February 2017. He previously served as President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of our general partner and WGP GP from February 2017 to May 2017, and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of our general partner from 2009 to February 2017 and of WGP GP from September 2012 to February 2017. Mr. Fink currently serves as a Senior Vice President at Anadarko, having joined the company in 2007. From 2001 until 2006, he held executive management positions at Prosoft Learning Corporation, including serving as its President and Chief Executive Officer from 2004 until that company’s sale in 2006. From 2000 to 2001 he co-founded and served as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Meta4 Group Limited, an online direct marketer based in Hong Kong and Tokyo. Previously, he held positions of increasing responsibility at Prudential Capital Group and Prudential Asset Management Asia, where he focused on the negotiation, structuring and execution of private debt and equity investments.
 
 
Jaime R. Casas
Age: 47
Houston, Texas
Officer since:
May 2017
Biography/Qualifications

Jaime R. Casas has served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of our general partner and of WGP GP since May 2017. Mr. Casas also has served as a Vice President, Finance of Anadarko since May 2017. Prior to joining the Partnership and WGP, Mr. Casas served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. from October 2016 until the company’s sale in April 2017. Previously, he served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of LRR Energy, L.P., a publicly traded exploration and production master limited partnership, from 2011 to October 2015, and as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Laredo Energy, a privately held oil and gas company, from 2009 to 2011. Prior to joining Laredo Energy, Mr. Casas worked for over a decade in various positions and industry groups in the investment banking divisions at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette and Credit Suisse. Mr. Casas began his career in 1993 as a management information consultant with Andersen Consulting.
 
 
Craig W. Collins
Age: 45
Houston, Texas
Officer since:
February 2017
Biography/Qualifications

Craig W. Collins has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of our general partner and WGP GP since February 2017. Mr. Collins was named Vice President – Midstream for Anadarko in February 2017, and previously served as Director, Midstream Engineering for Anadarko from July 2016 to February 2017, during which time he was responsible for the engineering and construction of midstream infrastructure for Anadarko and the Partnership. He joined the Anadarko midstream organization in November 2010, where he led commercial development activities in the Eagleford shale, and was promoted to General Manager in June 2013, with commercial responsibilities for midstream assets located in Texas, New Mexico, Kansas, Louisiana, and Pennsylvania. Since joining Anadarko in 2003, Mr. Collins has also held positions of increasing responsibility in Treasury and Corporate Development.
 
 
Philip H. Peacock
Age: 46
Houston, Texas
Officer since:
August 2012
Biography/Qualifications
 
Philip H. Peacock has served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of our general partner and WGP GP since February 2017, and served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of our general partner from August 2012 until February 2017. Mr. Peacock served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of WGP GP from September 2012 until February 2017. Prior to joining the Partnership, Mr. Peacock was a partner practicing corporate and securities law at the law firm of Andrews Kurth LLP, which he joined in 2003. He is licensed to practice law in the state of Texas.
 
 

157

Table of Contents

Steven D. Arnold
Age: 57
Houston, Texas
Director since:
February 2014
Independent
Biography/Qualifications
 
Steven D. Arnold has served as a director of our general partner and as a member of the Special Committee and Audit Committee of the Board of Directors since February 2014. Mr. Arnold served on the Board of Directors of the general partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP from 2007 to December 2013, during which time he served on that board’s Audit Committee and Conflicts Committee. He served as Chairman of each of those committees at separate times during his board membership. Mr. Arnold is engaged in private investment management and consulting services in Houston, Texas through 3 Lights Management Co., serving as its President since inception in 2000. Mr. Arnold has over ten years of institutional investment management experience with Prudential Financial, Inc. Mr. Arnold brings strong risk assessment and strategic expertise to the board.
 
 
Daniel E. Brown
Age: 42
Houston, Texas
Director since:
November 2017
Not Independent
Biography/Qualifications

Daniel E. Brown has served as a director of our general partner and of WGP GP since November 2017. Mr. Brown has served as Executive Vice President, U.S. Onshore Operations, with responsibility for Anadarko’s upstream and midstream activity in Colorado, Texas, Utah and Wyoming since October 2017. He previously served as Executive Vice President, International and Deepwater Operations from May to October 2017, Senior Vice President, International and Deepwater Operations from August 2016 to May 2017, and Vice President, Operations for Anadarko’s Southern and Appalachia Region from August 2013 to August 2016. Mr. Brown has nearly 20 years of experience in the oil and natural gas industry, beginning his career in 1998 with Kerr-McGee Corporation. He has since held a variety of positions within Anadarko, including Vice President, Corporate Planning, General Manager of the Maverick Basin and Anadarko’s Freestone/Chalk area (U.S. onshore), Business Advisor for Planning and Reserves Administration in the Gulf of Mexico, and in engineering positions in both the U.S. onshore and the Gulf of Mexico.
 
 
Milton Carroll
Age: 67
Houston, Texas
Director since:
2008
Independent
Biography/Qualifications
 
Milton Carroll has served as a director of our general partner and as Chairman of the Special Committee of the Board of Directors since 2008. Mr. Carroll currently serves as Executive Chairman of Houston-based CenterPoint Energy, Inc., where he has been a director since 1992. He also serves as Chairman of Health Care Services Corporation (a Chicago-based company operating through its Blue Cross and Blue Shield divisions in Illinois, Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Montana) and as a director of Halliburton Company, where he serves as a member of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. From 2010 to July 2016, Mr. Carroll served as a director of LyondellBasell Industries N.V., where he served as a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee, and from 2011 to January 2014, he served as a director of the general partner of LRR Energy, L.P. Mr. Carroll also served as a director of EGL, Inc. from 2003 until 2007 and as a director of the general partner of DCP Midstream Partners, LP from 2005 to 2006.
 
 
James R. Crane
Age: 64
Houston, Texas
Director since:
April 2008
Independent
Biography/Qualifications
 
James R. Crane has served as a director of our general partner and as a member of the Special Committee and Audit Committee of the Board of Directors since 2008. In 2011, Mr. Crane became the principal owner and Chairman of the Houston Astros Baseball Club. Mr. Crane is also the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Crane Capital Group Inc., an investment management company he founded. Crane Capital Group currently invests in transportation, power distribution, real estate and asset management. Its holdings include Crane Worldwide Logistics, a premier global provider of customized transportation and logistics services with 54 offices in 20 countries. Prior to founding Crane Capital Group Inc., he was founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EGL, Inc., a global transportation, supply chain management and information services company, from 1984 until its sale in 2007. Mr. Crane currently serves as a director of Nabors Industries Ltd., an international drilling contractor and well-services provider. From 2010 to February 2012, he served as a director of Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company, a subsidiary of Health Care Service Corporation, and from 1999 to 2007 he served as a director of HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.
 
 

158

Table of Contents

Darrell E. Hollek
Age: 60
Houston, Texas
Director from:
May 2015 to December 2017
Not Independent
Biography/Qualifications

From May 2015 until his retirement in December 2017, Darrell E. Hollek served as a director of our general partner and as a director of WGP GP from May 2015 until November 2017. Mr. Hollek served as Executive Vice President, Operations of Anadarko from August 2016 to May 2017. He served as Executive Vice President, U.S. Onshore Exploration and Production of Anadarko from April 2015 to August 2016, and served as Senior Vice President, Operations (Deepwater Americas) of Anadarko from May 2013 to April 2015. Prior to these positions, he served as Vice President, Operations of Anadarko since 2007. Mr. Hollek joined Anadarko upon the acquisition of Kerr-McGee Corporation in 2006. He has held positions of increasing responsibility with Anadarko and Kerr-McGee Corporation, where he began his career, including management roles in the Gulf of Mexico, U.S. Onshore and Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory.
 
 
Robert K. Reeves
Age: 60
Houston, Texas
Director since:
2007
Not Independent
Biography/Qualifications
 
Robert K. Reeves has served as a director of our general partner since 2007 and as a director of WGP GP since September 2012. Mr. Reeves was named Executive Vice President, Law and Chief Administrative Officer of Anadarko in September 2015 and previously served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer since May 2013 and as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer since 2007. He also served as a director of Key Energy Services, Inc., a publicly traded oil field services company, from 2007 to December 2016. Prior to joining Anadarko, he served as Executive Vice President, Administration and General Counsel of North Sea New Ventures from 2003 to 2004 and as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Ocean Energy, Inc. and its predecessor companies from 1997 to 2003.
 
 
David J. Tudor
Age: 58
Houston, Texas
Director since:
2008
Independent
Biography/Qualifications
 
David J. Tudor has served as a director of our general partner and as Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors since 2008, and previously served as a member of the Special Committee of the Board of Directors from 2008 to December 2012. Mr. Tudor has served as a director of WGP GP and as Chairman of the Audit Committee of its Board of Directors since December 2012. Since May 2016, Mr. Tudor has served as Chief Executive Officer and General Manager of Associated Electric Cooperative Inc., a member-owned, member-governed wholesale power provider serving Missouri, Iowa and Oklahoma. From May 2013 to May 2016, Mr. Tudor served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Champion Energy Services, a retail electric provider. From 1999 through 2013, Mr. Tudor was the President and Chief Executive Officer of ACES, an Indianapolis-based commodity risk management company owned by 21 generation and transmission cooperatives throughout the United States. Prior to joining ACES, Mr. Tudor was the Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer of PG&E Energy Trading, where he managed commercial operations in the United States and Canada.


159

Table of Contents

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our general partner’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10 percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC, and any exchange or other system on which such securities are traded or quoted, initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common units and other equity securities. Officers, directors and greater-than-10-percent unitholders are required by the SEC’s regulations to furnish to us, and any exchange or other system on which such securities are traded or quoted, with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file with the SEC.
To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, we believe that all reporting obligations of our general partner’s officers, directors and greater-than-10-percent unitholders under Section 16(a) were satisfied during the year ended December 31, 2017 .

Reimbursement of Expenses of Our General Partner and Its Affiliates

Our general partner does not receive any management fee or other compensation for its management of our Partnership under the omnibus agreement, the services and secondment agreement or otherwise. Under our partnership and omnibus agreements, we reimburse Anadarko for general and administrative expenses allocated to us, as determined by Anadarko in its reasonable discretion. Read Part III, Item 13 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding these agreements.

Board Committees

The Board of Directors has two standing committees: the Audit Committee and the Special Committee.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is comprised of three independent directors, Messrs. Tudor (Chairman), Arnold and Crane, each of whom is able to understand fundamental financial statements and at least one of whom has past experience in accounting or related financial management experience. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent under the NYSE listing standards and the Exchange Act. In making the independence determination, the Board considered the requirements of the NYSE and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Audit Committee held four meetings in 2017 .
Mr. Tudor has been designated by the Board of Directors as the “Audit Committee financial expert” meeting the requirements promulgated by the SEC based upon his education and employment experience as more fully detailed in Mr. Tudor’s biography set forth above.
The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, our internal control over financial reporting, and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and Partnership policies and controls. The Audit Committee has the sole authority to, among other things, (1) retain and terminate our independent registered public accounting firm, (2) approve all auditing services and related fees and the terms thereof performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, and (3) establish policies and procedures for the pre-approval of all audit, audit-related, non-audit and tax services to be rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee is also responsible for confirming the independence and objectivity of our independent registered public accounting firm. Our independent registered public accounting firm has been given unrestricted access to the Audit Committee and to our management, as necessary.


160

Table of Contents

Special Committee

The Special Committee is comprised of three independent directors, Messrs. Carroll (Chairman), Arnold, and Crane. The Special Committee reviews specific matters that the Board believes may involve conflicts of interest (including certain transactions with Anadarko). The Special Committee will determine, as set forth in the partnership agreement, if the resolution of a conflict of interest submitted to it is fair and reasonable to us. The members of the Special Committee are not officers or employees of our general partner or directors, officers, or employees of its affiliates, including Anadarko. Our partnership agreement provides that any matters approved in good faith by the Special Committee will be conclusively deemed to be fair and reasonable to us, approved by all of our partners and not a breach by our general partner of any duties it may owe us or our unitholders. The Special Committee held two meetings in 2017 .

Meeting of Non-Management Directors and Communications with Directors

At each quarterly meeting of our Board of Directors, all of our independent directors meet in an executive session without management participation or participation by non-independent directors. Mr. Carroll, the Chairman of the Special Committee, presides over these executive sessions.
The Board of Directors welcomes questions or comments about the Partnership and its operations. Unitholders or interested parties may contact the Board of Directors, including any individual director, at boardofdirectors@westerngas.com or at the following address and fax number: Name of the Director(s), c/o Corporate Secretary, Western Gas Partners, LP, 1201 Lake Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77380, (832) 636-6001.

Code of Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and Board Committee Charters

Our general partner has adopted a Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers (the “Code of Ethics”), which applies to our general partner’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, principal accounting officer, Controller and all other senior financial and accounting officers of our general partner. If the general partner amends the Code of Ethics or grants a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from the Code of Ethics, we will disclose the information on our website. Our general partner has also adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that outline the important policies and practices regarding our governance and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all employees of Anadarko or affiliates of Anadarko who perform services for us and our general partner.
We make available free of charge, within the “Governance” section of our website at www.westerngas.com , and in print to any unitholder who so requests, our Code of Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Audit Committee charter and Special Committee charter. Requests for print copies may be directed to investors@westerngas.com or to: Investor Relations, Western Gas Partners LP, 1201 Lake Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77380, or telephone (832) 636-6000. The information contained on, or connected to, our website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this or any other report that we file with or furnish to the SEC.


161

Table of Contents

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Overview

We do not directly employ any of the persons responsible for managing our business, and our Board of Directors does not have a compensation committee. The compensation of Anadarko’s employees that perform services on our behalf, including our executive officers, is approved by Anadarko’s management. Our reimbursement to Anadarko for the compensation of executive officers is governed by the omnibus agreement. Under our partnership and omnibus agreements, we reimburse general and administrative expenses as determined by Anadarko in its reasonable discretion. Read the caption Omnibus Agreement under Part III, Item 13 of this Form 10-K.
Our “named executive officers” for 2017 were Donald R. Sinclair (the principal executive officer through February 12, 2017), Benjamin M. Fink (the principal executive officer effective February 13, 2017; the principal financial officer through May 21, 2017), Jaime R. Casas (the principal financial officer and principal accounting officer effective May 22, 2017), Craig W. Collins (the principal operating officer effective February 13, 2017) and Philip H. Peacock (the senior vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary). Compensation paid or awarded by us in 2017 with respect to the named executive officers reflects only the portion of compensation expense that is allocated to us pursuant to Anadarko’s allocation methodology, as described below, and subject to the terms of the omnibus agreement. Anadarko has the ultimate decision-making authority with respect to the total compensation of the named executive officers and, subject to the terms of the omnibus agreement, the portion of such compensation we reimburse pursuant to Anadarko’s allocation methodology. Generally, once Anadarko has established the aggregate amount to be paid or awarded to the named executive officers with respect to each element of compensation for services rendered to both our general partner and Anadarko, such aggregate amount is multiplied by an allocation percentage for each named executive officer. Each allocation percentage is established based on a periodic, good-faith estimate made by each named executive officer and is subject to review by the Chairman of our Board of Directors. The resulting amount (other than with respect to certain long-term incentive plan awards) is the amount reimbursed to Anadarko by us pursuant to the terms of the omnibus agreement and appears in the Summary Compensation Table below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, perquisites are not currently allocated to us, and reimbursement of bonus amounts under the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table are capped consistent with the methodology set forth in the services and secondment agreement for all employees whose compensation is allocated to us.
The following table presents the estimated percentage of time (“time allocation”) that the general partner’s named executive officers devoted to the Partnership during the year ended December 31, 2017 , which percentage represents the time devoted to the business of the Partnership relative to time devoted to the businesses of the Partnership and Anadarko in the aggregate:
Named Executive Officers of Our General Partner
 
Time
Allocated
 
Anadarko Corporate Officer
Benjamin M. Fink
 
90.0%
 
Yes
Jaime R. Casas
 
90.0%
 
Yes
Craig W. Collins
 
50.0%
 
Yes
Philip H. Peacock
 
50.0%
 
Yes
Donald R. Sinclair
 
50.0%
 
No


162

Table of Contents

Our named executive officers are compensated by Anadarko in a manner that is generally consistent with the objectives and philosophies used to develop the compensation packages for Anadarko’s named executive officers, as described in the Anadarko proxy statement. The following discussion relating to compensation paid by Anadarko is based on information provided to us by Anadarko and does not purport to be a complete discussion and analysis of Anadarko’s executive compensation philosophy and practices. For a more complete analysis of the compensation programs and philosophies used at Anadarko, read Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained within Anadarko’s proxy statement, which is expected to be filed with the SEC no later than April 5, 2018 . The elements of compensation discussed below (and Anadarko’s decisions with respect to the levels of such compensation) are not subject to approvals by the WES Board of Directors or WGP Board of Directors, as applicable, including the Audit or Special Committees thereof.

Elements of Compensation

The primary elements of Anadarko’s compensation program are a combination of annual cash and long-term equity-based compensation. For 2017 , the principal elements of compensation for the named executive officers were as follows:

base salary;

annual cash incentives;

equity-based compensation, which includes equity-based compensation under Anadarko’s 2012 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”); and

certain other Anadarko benefits that are provided on the same basis to other eligible Anadarko employees, including welfare and retirement benefits, severance benefits and change of control benefits, plus other benefits.

Base salary.  Anadarko’s management establishes base salaries to provide a fixed level of income for our named executive officers based on their level of responsibility (which may or may not be related to our business), their relative expertise and experience, and in some cases their potential for advancement. As discussed above, a portion of the base salaries of our named executive officers is allocated to us based on Anadarko’s methodology used for allocating general and administrative expenses.

Annual cash incentives (bonuses). Anadarko will make annual cash awards to our named executive officers in 2018 for their performance during the year ended December 31, 2017 , under the 2017 Anadarko annual incentive program (“AIP”), which is administered under the Omnibus Plan. Annual cash incentive awards are used by Anadarko to motivate its executives and employees, reward them for the achievement of Anadarko objectives aligned with value creation, and/or recognize individual contributions to Anadarko’s performance. The AIP puts a portion of an executive’s compensation at risk by linking potential annual compensation to Anadarko’s achievement of specific operational, financial and safety performance metrics during the year. The AIP bonuses paid to our named executive officers are determined by Anadarko’s management.
The portion of any annual cash awards allocable to us is based on Anadarko’s methodology used for allocating general and administrative expenses, subject to the limitations established in the omnibus agreement. Anadarko’s general policy is to pay these awards during the first quarter of each calendar year for the prior year’s performance.

Long-term incentive awards under the Omnibus Plan. Anadarko periodically makes equity-based awards under the Omnibus Plan to align the interests of its executive officers and employees with those of Anadarko stockholders by emphasizing the long-term growth in Anadarko’s value. For 2017 , the annual equity awards generally consisted of a combination of (1) performance units, (2) stock options, and (3) time-based restricted stock units or shares of restricted stock. This award structure is intended to provide a combination of equity-based vehicles that is performance-based in absolute and relative terms, while also encouraging retention. The costs allocated to us for the named executive officers’ compensation includes an allocation of expense associated with a portion of these awards in accordance with the allocation mechanisms in the omnibus agreement.


163

Table of Contents

Other benefits.   In addition to the compensation discussed above, Anadarko also provides other benefits to the named executive officers, including the following:

retirement benefits to match competitive practices in Anadarko’s industry, including participation in Anadarko’s employee savings plan, savings restoration plan, retirement plan and retirement restoration plan;

severance benefits under the Anadarko Officer Severance Plan;

certain change of control benefits under key employee change of control contracts;

director and officer indemnification agreements;

a limited number of perquisites, including financial counseling, tax preparation and estate planning, an executive physical program, management life insurance, voluntary participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan, and personal excess liability insurance; and

certain benefits that are also provided to all other eligible U.S.-based Anadarko employees, including medical, dental, vision, flexible spending and health savings accounts, paid time off, life insurance and disability coverage.

For a more detailed summary of Anadarko’s executive compensation program and the benefits provided thereunder, read Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained within Anadarko’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the SEC no later than April 5, 2018 .

Role of Executive Officers in Executive Compensation

Anadarko’s management determines a significant part of the compensation for each of our named executive officers. The Board of Directors determines compensation for the independent, non-management directors of our general partner’s Board of Directors, as well as any grants made under the WES LTIP. None of our named executive officers provides compensation recommendations to the Anadarko Compensation and Benefits Committee or Anadarko’s management team regarding compensation (other than recommendations with respect to employees that report directly to them).

Compensation Mix

We believe that the mix of base salary, cash awards, equity-based awards under Anadarko’s Omnibus Plan and other Anadarko compensation, fit Anadarko’s and our overall compensation objectives. We believe this mix of compensation provides competitive compensation opportunities to align and drive employee performance in support of our business strategies, as well as Anadarko’s, and to attract, motivate and retain high-quality talent with the skills and competencies required by us and Anadarko.


164

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

As noted above, we do not directly employ any of the persons responsible for managing or operating our business and we have no compensation committee. Instead, we are managed by our general partner, the executive officers of which are employees of Anadarko. Our reimbursement for the compensation of executive officers is governed by the omnibus agreement and the services and secondment agreement described in the caption Agreements with Anadarko—Services and Secondment Agreement under Part III, Item 13 of this Form 10-K.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the compensation amounts expensed by us for our named executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , as applicable. Except as specifically noted, the amounts included in the table below reflect the portion of the expense allocated to us by Anadarko. For a discussion of the allocation percentages in effect for 2017 , see the Overview section, above.
Name and Principal Position
 
Year
 
Salary
($) (1)
 
Bonus
($)
 
Stock
Awards
($) (2)
 
Option
Awards
($) (3)
 
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) (4)
 
All Other
Compensation
($) (5)
 
Total
($)
Benjamin M. Fink
 
2017
 
415,385

 

 
2,062,764

 
1,101,952

 
325,122

 
138,498

 
4,043,721

President and
 
2016
 
332,135

 

 
1,634,281

 
401,340

 
259,066

 
108,526

 
2,735,348

Chief Executive Officer
2015
 
341,135

 

 
672,651

 
364,951

 
266,085

 
102,170

 
1,746,992

Jaime R. Casas
 
2017
 
208,731

 

 
1,257,309

 
904,934

 
135,675

 
71,607

 
2,578,256

Senior Vice President, Chief
 
2016
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial Officer and Treasurer
2015
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Craig W. Collins
 
2017
 
146,827

 

 
1,029,025

 
279,272

 
91,209

 
49,090

 
1,595,423

Senior Vice President and
 
2016
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chief Operating Officer
 
2015
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Philip H. Peacock
 
2017
 
150,082

 

 
906,771

 
218,869

 
88,894

 
50,098

 
1,414,714

Senior Vice President, General Counsel
 
2016
 
129,938

 

 
100,020

 

 
62,370

 
42,427

 
334,755

and Corporate Secretary
 
2015
 
134,935

 

 
85,010

 

 
64,769

 
40,413

 
325,127

Donald R. Sinclair
 
2017
 
40,385

 

 

 

 

 
12,978

 
53,363

Former President and
 
2016
 
356,971

 

 
1,875,920

 
615,378

 
342,692

 
116,869

 
3,307,830

Chief Executive Officer
 
2015
 
350,481

 

 
828,646

 
449,573

 
336,462

 
104,969

 
2,070,131

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
The amounts in this column reflect the base salary compensation allocated to us by Anadarko for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . Mr. Sinclair’s amount reflects base salary compensation earned and allocated through February 12, 2017. Mr. Casas’ amount reflects base salary compensation earned and allocated since joining the Partnership on May 22, 2017.
(2)  
The amounts in this column reflect the expected allocation to us of the grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (without respect to the risk of forfeitures), for non-option stock awards granted pursuant to the 2012 Anadarko Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plans and include unvested amounts. For a discussion of valuation assumptions for the awards under the 2012 Anadarko Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plans, see Note 22—Share-Based Compensation in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part II, Item 8 of Anadarko’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (which is not, and shall not be deemed to be, incorporated by reference herein). For information regarding the non-option stock awards granted to the named executives in 2017 , see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. The amounts in this column also reflect the allocation of Anadarko performance unit awards, where such gross amounts are subject to market conditions and have been valued based on the probable outcome of the market conditions as of the grant date.


165

Table of Contents

(3)  
The amounts in this column reflect the expected allocation to us of the grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (without respect to the risk of forfeitures), for option awards granted pursuant to the 2012 Anadarko Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plans. See note (2) above for valuation assumptions. For information regarding the option awards granted to the named executives in 2017 , see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.
(4)  
The amounts in this column reflect the compensation under the Anadarko annual incentive program expected to be allocated to us for the year ended December 31, 2017 , and allocated to us for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 . Given the timing of when payments are to be made in 2018, the 2017 amounts represent payments which were earned in 2017 and are expected to be paid in early 2018 , with an assumed at-target payout, which may not be indicative of the payout our named executive officers will actually receive. The 2016 amounts represent payments which were earned in 2016 and paid in early 2017 and the 2015 amounts represent the payments which were earned in 2015 and paid in early 2016 . For an explanation of the 2017 annual incentive plan awards, read Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Analysis of 2017 Compensation Actions – Performance-Based Annual Cash Incentives (Bonuses), contained within Anadarko’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed no later than April 5, 2018 .
(5)  
The amounts in this column reflect the compensation expenses related to Anadarko’s retirement and savings plans that were allocated to us for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . Mr. Sinclair’s amounts reflect allocated expenses through February 12, 2017. The 2017 allocated expenses are detailed in the table below:
Name
 
Retirement Plan
Expense
 
Savings Plan
Expense
Benjamin M. Fink
 
$
101,047

 
$
37,451

Jaime R. Casas
 
53,119

 
18,488

Craig W. Collins
 
35,872

 
13,218

Philip H. Peacock
 
36,561

 
13,537

Donald R. Sinclair
 
9,312

 
3,666



166

Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017

The following table sets forth information concerning annual incentive awards, stock options, phantom units, restricted stock shares, restricted stock units and performance units granted during 2017 to each of the named executive officers. Except for amounts in the column entitled Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards, the dollar amounts and number of securities included in the table below reflect an allocation based upon each named executive officer’s allocation of time to Partnership business. Mr. Sinclair did not receive any grants in 2017.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
All
Other 
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#) (3)
 
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#) (4)
 
Exercise
or
Base Price
of Option
Awards
($/Sh)
 
Grant
Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards  
($) (5)
 
 
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (1)
 
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards   (2)
 
 
 
 
Name and Grant Date
 
Threshold 
($)
 
Target 
($)
 
Maximum 
($)
 
Threshold 
(#)
 
Target 
(#)
 
Maximum 
(#)
 
 
 
 
Benjamin M. Fink
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
325,122

 
390,146

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
02/13/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10,365

 
68.14

 
235,198

02/13/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,393

 
3,482

 
6,964

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
281,528

02/13/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,477

 
 
 
 
 
168,769

11/14/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
57,803

 
48.05

 
866,754

11/14/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,268

 
18,169

 
36,338

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
993,674

11/14/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12,878

 
 
 
 
 
618,793

Jaime R. Casas
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
135,675

 
162,810

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
05/22/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
29,174

 
53.35

 
495,194

05/22/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9,279

 
 
 
 
 
495,035

11/14/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
27,325

 
48.05

 
409,740

11/14/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3,436

 
8,590

 
17,180

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
469,765

11/14/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6,088

 
 
 
 
 
292,509

Craig W. Collins
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
91,209

 
109,451

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
02/13/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,678

 
68.14

 
174,209

02/13/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,032

 
2,580

 
5,160

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
208,553

02/13/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,835

 
 
 
 
 
125,003

11/14/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,007

 
48.05

 
105,063

11/14/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
881

 
2,203

 
4,406

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
120,455

11/14/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10,406

 
 
 
 
 
500,008

11/14/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,561

 
 
 
 
 
75,006

Philip H. Peacock
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
88,894

 
106,673

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
03/27/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5,362

 
59.94

 
105,049

03/27/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
688

 
1,721

 
3,442

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
120,005

03/27/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,252

 
 
 
 
 
75,015

11/14/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,591

 
48.05

 
113,820

11/14/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
954

 
2,386

 
4,772

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
130,490

11/14/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10,406

 
 
 
 
 
500,008

11/14/17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,691

 
 
 
 
 
81,253


167

Table of Contents

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Reflects the estimated 2017 cash payouts allocable to us under Anadarko’s annual incentive plan. If threshold levels of performance are not met, then the payout can be zero. The maximum value reflects the maximum amount allocable to us consistent with the methodologies set forth in the services and secondment agreement. The expense expected to be allocated to us for the actual bonus payouts under the annual incentive program for 2017 is reflected in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. For additional discussion of Anadarko’s annual incentive plan, read Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Analysis of 2017 Compensation Actions — Performance-Based Annual Cash Incentives (Bonuses) contained within Anadarko’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed no later than April 5, 2018 .
(2)  
Reflects the estimated future payout allocable to us under Anadarko’s performance units awarded in 2017 . Under the performance unit program, participants may earn from 0% to 200% of the targeted award based on Anadarko’s relative total shareholder return performance over a three-year performance period. If earned, the awards are to be paid in cash rather than equity. The threshold value represents the minimum payment (other than zero) that may be earned. In addition to the annual grants in November 2017, Messrs. Fink, Collins and Peacock received performance unit awards earlier in the year as a result of their respective promotions. For additional discussion of Anadarko’s performance unit awards, read Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Analysis of 2017 Compensation Actions — Equity Compensation contained within Anadarko’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed no later than April 5, 2018 .
(3)  
Reflects the allocable number of restricted stock shares and restricted stock units awarded in 2017 under the Omnibus Plan. Generally speaking, these awards vest ratably over three years, beginning with the first anniversary of the grant date. For restricted stock shares, dividends are paid at the same time as dividends are paid with respect to outstanding shares of Anadarko common stock. For restricted stock units, dividend equivalents are reinvested in shares of Anadarko common stock and paid upon the applicable vesting of the underlying award. In addition to the annual grants in November 2017, Messrs. Fink, Collins and Peacock received restricted stock unit awards with three year vesting schedules earlier in the year as a result of their respective promotions, and Mr. Casas received restricted stock unit awards with a four year vesting schedule upon his hire. Also included are the 10,406 allocated special restricted stock units awarded in 2017 under the Omnibus Plan to each of Messrs. Collins and Peacock, which will vest in four years from grant date, provided Messrs. Collins and Peacock remain employed by Anadarko until such date.
(4)  
Reflects the allocable number of Anadarko stock options each named executive officer was awarded in 2017 . These awards vest ratably over three years, beginning with the first anniversary of the date of grant and have a term of seven years. In addition to the annual grants in November 2017, Messrs. Fink, Collins and Peacock received Anadarko stock options with three year vesting schedules earlier in the year as a result of their respective promotions, and Mr. Casas received options with a four year vesting schedule upon his hire.
(5)  
The amounts included in the Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards column represent the expected allocation to us of the grant date fair value of the awards made to named executives in 2017 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The value ultimately realized by the executive upon the actual vesting of the award(s) or the exercise of the stock option(s) may or may not be equal to the determined value. For a discussion of valuation assumptions for the awards under the Omnibus Plan, see Note 22—Share-Based Compensation in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of Anadarko’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (which is not, and shall not be deemed to be, incorporated by reference herein).


168

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End 2017

The following table reflects outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2017 , for each of the named executive officers, including awards under Anadarko’s Omnibus Plan. As of December 31, 2017, none of our named executive officers have any outstanding WES LTIP or WGP LTIP awards. The market values shown are based on Anadarko’s closing stock price of $53.64 on December 29 , 2017 , unless otherwise noted. Except for amounts in the column entitled Option Exercise Price, the dollar amounts and number of securities included in the table below reflect an allocation based upon each officer’s allocation of time to Partnership business at December 31, 2017 .
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock Awards
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
Performance Units (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted Stock
Shares/Units (2)
 
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
 
Market
Payout
Value of Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)
 
 
Option Awards (1)
 
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 
 
 
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised Options
 
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 
Option
Expiration
Date
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exercisable
(#)
 
Unexercisable
(#)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Name
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Benjamin M. Fink
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
03/04/11
 
1,571

 

 
81.02

 
03/04/18

 

 

 

 

06/07/13
 
1,453

 

 
87.98

 
06/07/20

 

 

 

 

11/06/13
 
6,058

 

 
92.02

 
11/06/20

 

 

 

 

11/06/14
 
14,816

 

 
93.51

 
11/06/21

 

 

 

 

11/06/14
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
3,990

 

10/26/15
 

 

 

 

 
1,266

 
67,908

 

 

10/26/15
 
13,460

 
6,729

 
69.00

 
10/26/22

 

 

 

 

10/26/15
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
5,786

 
124,144

11/10/16
 

 

 

 

 
14,614

 
783,895

 

 

11/10/16
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
6,437

 
138,112

11/10/16
 
6,464

 
12,928

 
61.87

 
11/10/23

 

 

 

 

11/10/16
 

 

 

 

 
3,044

 
163,280

 

 

02/13/17
 

 
10,365

 
68.14

 
02/13/24

 

 

 

 

02/13/17
 

 

 

 

 
2,486

 
133,349

 

 

02/13/17
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
3,482

 
74,710

11/14/17
 

 

 

 

 
12,890

 
691,420

 

 

11/14/17
 

 
57,803

 
48.05

 
11/14/24

 

 

 

 

11/14/17
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
18,169

 
974,585

Jaime R. Casas
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
05/22/17
 

 
29,174

 
53.35

 
05/22/24

 

 

 

 

05/22/17
 

 

 

 

 
9,307

 
499,227

 

 

11/14/17
 

 

 

 

 
6,093

 
326,829

 

 

11/14/17
 

 
27,325

 
48.05

 
11/14/24

 

 

 

 

11/14/17
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
8,590

 
460,768








169

Table of Contents

Craig W. Collins
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
03/04/11
 
198

 

 
81.02

 
03/04/18

 

 

 

 

03/09/15
 

 

 

 

 
413

 
22,153

 

 

04/12/16
 

 

 

 

 
1,497

 
80,299

 

 

02/13/17
 

 
7,678

 
68.14

 
02/13/24

 

 

 

 

02/13/17
 

 

 

 

 
1,842

 
98,805

 

 

02/13/17
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
2,580

 
55,356

11/14/17
 

 

 

 

 
10,416

 
558,714

 

 

11/14/17
 

 

 

 

 
1,562

 
83,786

 

 

11/14/17
 

 
7,007

 
48.05

 
11/14/24

 

 

 

 

11/14/17
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
2,203

 
118,169

Philip H. Peacock
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
03/09/15
 

 

 

 

 
351

 
18,828

 

 

04/12/16
 

 

 

 

 
1,331

 
71,395

 

 

03/27/17
 

 
5,362

 
59.94

 
03/27/24

 

 

 

 

03/27/17
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
1,721

 
92,314

03/27/17
 

 

 

 

 
1,256

 
67,372

 

 

11/14/17
 

 

 

 

 
10,416

 
558,714

 

 

11/14/17
 

 

 

 

 
1,693

 
90,813

 

 

11/14/17
 

 
7,591

 
48.05

 
11/14/24

 

 

 

 

11/14/17
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
2,386

 
127,985

                                                                                                                                                                                    

(1)  
Stock options have a seven-year term and will vest ratably over three years in equal installments on the first, second, and third anniversaries of the date of grant. Stock option awards do not accrue dividends or dividend equivalents.
(2)  
Generally speaking, the restricted stock units and shares will vest pro-rata annually over three years, beginning with the first anniversary of the grant date. At the end of each vesting period, unless deferred, the number of restricted stock units that vest are settled in shares of unrestricted common stock, less applicable withholding taxes. For restricted stock shares, dividends are paid at the same time as dividends are paid with respect to outstanding shares of Anadarko common stock. For restricted stock units, dividend equivalents are accrued and reinvested in additional shares of common stock, less applicable withholding taxes. The 14,547 allocated special restricted stock units received in November 2016 by Mr. Fink, and the 10,406 allocated special restricted stock units received in November 2017 by each of Messrs. Collins and Peacock, as well as the corresponding dividend unit equivalents, will vest in four years from the grant date, provided Messrs. Fink, Collins and Peacock remain employed by Anadarko until such dates.
(3)  
The number of outstanding units and the estimated payout percentages disclosed for each award are calculated based on Anadarko’s relative performance ranking as of December 31, 2017 , and are not necessarily indicative of what the payout percent earned will be at the end of each three-year performance period. Anadarko’s relative performance rankings as of December 31, 2017 were: 0% for the 2014 grant, 40% for the 2015 grant, 40% for the 2016 grant and 40% for the February and March 2017 grant. For awards granted in November 2017 with a performance period beginning in 2018, target payout has been assumed.


170

Table of Contents

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2017

The following table reflects Anadarko option awards exercised in 2017 and Anadarko stock awards and WGP LTIP phantom units that vested in 2017 . The dollar amounts and number of securities included in the table below reflect an allocation based upon each officer’s allocation of time to Partnership business. No expense was allocated to us for Mr. Sinclair on any option exercises and stock award vesting in 2017.
 
 
Option Awards
 
Stock Awards
Name
 
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) (1)
 
Value Realized on Exercise ($) (1)
 
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) (2)
 
Value Realized on Vesting ($)  (2)
Benjamin M. Fink
 

 

 
3,691

 
184,969

Jaime R. Casas
 

 

 

 

Craig W. Collins
 

 

 
1,539

 
96,238

Philip H. Peacock
 

 

 
1,353

 
84,646

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Shares acquired and values realized on exercise include options exercised in 2017 . The actual value ultimately realized by the named executive officer may be more or less than the realized value calculated in the above table depending on the timing in which the named executive officer held or sold the stock associated with the exercise.
(2)  
Shares acquired and values realized on vesting reflect the taxable value to the named executive officer as of the date of the vesting in 2017 of restricted stock shares or units, performance units, or phantom units. For restricted stock shares or units and phantom units, the actual value ultimately realized by the named executive officer may be more or less than the value realized calculated in the above table depending on the timing in which the named executive officer held or sold the stock associated with the exercise or vesting occurrence.

Pension Benefits for 2017

Anadarko maintains both funded, tax-qualified defined benefit pension plans and unfunded nonqualified pension benefit plans. The nonqualified pension benefit plans are designed to provide for supplementary pension benefits due to limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code that restrict the amount of benefits payable under tax-qualified plans. Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in these plans. Under the omnibus agreement, a portion of the annual expense related to these plans is reimbursed by us to Anadarko. The allocated expense for each named executive officer is included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. We have not included a pension benefits table as Anadarko does not allocate expense to the Partnership upon an employee’s retirement and the subsequent payment of benefits under such pension plans. For additional discussion on Anadarko’s pension benefits, read  Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Indirect Compensation Elements — Retirement Benefits contained within Anadarko’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed no later than April 5, 2018 .


171

Table of Contents

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2017

Anadarko maintains a deferred compensation plan and a savings restoration plan for a select group of management and highly compensated employees who have reached the applicable Internal Revenue Code contribution limitations, including our named executive officers. The deferred compensation plan allows certain employees to voluntarily defer receipt of up to 75% of their salary and/or up to 100% of their annual incentive bonus payments. The savings restoration plan accrues a benefit substantially equal to the amount that, in the absence of certain Internal Revenue Code limitations, would have been allocated to their account as matching contributions under Anadarko’s 401(k) Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the omnibus agreement, a portion of the expense related to these plans is reimbursed by us to Anadarko. The allocated expense for each named executive officer is included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. We have not included a nonqualified deferred compensation table as Anadarko does not allocate expense to the Partnership upon distribution of such balances. For additional discussion on Anadarko’s nonqualified deferred compensation benefits, read  Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Indirect Compensation Elements — Other Benefits sections contained within Anadarko’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed no later than April 5, 2018 .

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

In the event of a Change of Control (as defined below) of the general partner, the only payments that we would be responsible for paying to our named executive officers relate to our allocated share of the accelerated vesting of unvested awards under the WES LTIP. Similarly, we would be responsible for paying our allocated share of any accelerated vesting of awards under the WGP LTIP if a Change of Control were to occur at WGP GP. As of December 31, 2017, none of our named executive officers have any outstanding WES LTIP or WGP LTIP awards.
We have not entered into any employment agreements with our named executive officers, nor do we manage any severance plans. However, our named executive officers are eligible for certain benefits provided by Anadarko. Currently, we are not allocated any expense for these agreements or plans, but for disclosure purposes we are presenting hypothetical allocations of the potential payments to be made by Anadarko in the event of termination of the named executive officer or a Change of Control of Anadarko. For the definition of a Change of Control of Anadarko, read Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control contained within Anadarko’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed no later than April 5, 2018 . Values reflect each named executive officer’s allocation of time to Partnership business at December 31, 2017 , and exclude those benefits generally provided to all salaried employees. For additional discussion related to these termination scenarios, read  Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Indirect Compensation Elements — Severance Benefits contained within Anadarko’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed no later than April 5, 2018 .
The following tables reflect the expenses that could be allocated to the Partnership by Anadarko as of December 31, 2017 , in connection with potential payments to our named executive officers under existing contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements, whether written or unwritten, with Anadarko, for various scenarios involving a Change of Control of Anadarko or termination of employment from Anadarko for each named executive officer, assuming a termination date of December 31, 2017 , and, where applicable, using the closing price of Anadarko’s common stock of $53.64 (as reported on the NYSE as of December 29 , 2017 ). For general definitions that apply to the termination of employment from Anadarko scenarios detailed below, read Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control contained within Anadarko’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed no later than April 5, 2018 . Actual amounts will be determinable only upon the termination or Change in Control event.

Involuntary For Cause
 
 
Mr. Fink
 
Mr. Casas
 
Mr. Collins
 
Mr. Peacock
Cash Severance
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Total
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$



172

Table of Contents

Voluntary Termination (Including Retirement)
 
 
Mr. Fink
 
Mr. Casas
 
Mr. Collins
 
Mr. Peacock
Payout of Performance Unit Awards (1)
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Continued Vesting of Restricted Stock Unit Awards (2)
 

 

 

 

Total
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Under the terms of the 2015 performance unit agreement, retirement-eligible participants, as defined by the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Retiree Health Benefits Plan, receive a prorated payout, paid after the end of the performance period, based on actual performance and the number of months worked during the performance period. Additionally, the performance unit agreements for awards granted on or after November 10, 2016 provide for payout at the end of the performance period, with no proration and based on actual performance, in cases of a qualified retirement, or retirement at or after age 60 with minimum 10 years of service. As of December 31, 2017 , none of our named executive officers were eligible for retirement nor qualified retirement.
(2)  
Under the terms of the restricted stock unit agreements effective on or after November 10, 2016, in the event of a qualified retirement, or retirement at or after age 60 with minimum 10 years of service, restricted stock units that are held for at least 180 days after grant date will be settled according to the vesting schedule. As of December 31, 2017 , none of our named executive officers were eligible for qualified retirement.

Involuntary Not For Cause Termination
 
 
Mr. Fink
 
Mr. Casas
 
Mr. Collins
 
Mr. Peacock
Cash Severance (1)
 
$
1,252,215

 
$
918,225

 
$
452,157

 
$
421,249

Pro-rata Bonus (2)
 
325,122

 
135,675

 
91,209

 
88,894

Accelerated Anadarko Equity Awards (3)
 
1,808,517

 
660,435

 
854,495

 
795,669

Supplemental Pension Benefits (4)
 

 

 

 

Medical and Dental (5)
 
7,497

 
14,298

 
4,165

 
4,165

Total
 
$
3,393,351

 
$
1,728,633

 
$
1,402,026

 
$
1,309,977

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
The values assume two times base salary plus one times target bonus multiplied by the applicable named executive officer’s allocation percentages in effect as of December 31, 2017 .
(2)  
Payment, if provided, will be paid at the end of the performance period based on actual performance. The values reflect the allocated portion of our named executive officer’s assumed at-target bonus awarded under the annual incentive plan. For additional discussion of this program, read Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Analysis of 2017 Compensation Actions — Performance-Based Annual Cash Incentives (Bonuses) of Anadarko’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed no later than April 5, 2018 .
(3)  
Reflects the in-the-money value of unvested stock options (subject to Anadarko’s Board of Directors approval), the estimated current value of unvested performance units (based on performance to date) and the value of unvested restricted stock shares and restricted stock units granted under Anadarko equity plans, all as of December 31, 2017 . In the event of an involuntary termination, unvested performance units would be paid after the end of the applicable performance period, based on actual performance. However, the performance unit awards and the restricted stock unit awards granted on November 14, 2017, are not included in the table above as accelerated vesting upon an involuntary not for cause termination only applies to such awards if they have been held for at least 180 days after the grant date, which would not be the case in the event of such a termination that occurred on December 31, 2017. The values for Messrs. Collins and Peacock include the 10,406 allocated special restricted stock units granted on November 14, 2017, and their respective dividend equivalent units, since these grants are not subject to the 180-day hold requirement. Further, while the terms of the outstanding stock options do not require Anadarko to accelerate the vesting of the stock options upon an involuntary termination not for cause, Anadarko’s Board of Directors has a historic practice of doing so and, as such, the value of acceleration of the outstanding stock option awards is included above. The equity awards granted on and after November 10, 2016 contain a non-disclosure covenant (indefinite duration) and non-disparagement and employee non-solicitation covenants (one year). All values reflect each named executive officer’s allocation percentage as of December 31, 2017 .
(4)  
Reflects the lump-sum present value of additional benefits related to Anadarko’s supplemental pension benefits which are contingent upon the termination event. The value includes special pension credits, provided through an employment agreement, retention agreement, the APC Retirement Restoration Plan or the KMG Restoration Plan, as applicable. The value of this benefit has not been included in this table as Anadarko does not allocate expense to the Partnership for distribution of these benefits. If Anadarko were to allocate this expense to the Partnership, assuming their allocation percentages in effect as of December 31, 2017, the expense would be as follows: Mr. Collins—$205,932.
(5)  
Values represent six months of medical and dental active employee rate benefit coverage. These amounts are present values determined in accordance with GAAP. These values reflect their allocation percentages in effect as of December 31, 2017 .


173

Table of Contents

Change of Control: Involuntary Termination or Voluntary For Good Reason
 
 
Mr. Fink
 
Mr. Casas
 
Mr. Collins
 
Mr. Peacock
Cash Severance (1)
 
$
1,593,000

 
$
964,350

 
$
512,000

 
$
499,636

Pro-rata Bonus (2)
 
346,500

 
135,675

 
83,500

 
87,318

Accelerated Anadarko Equity Awards (3)
 
3,474,522

 
1,448,031

 
1,056,450

 
1,014,466

Supplemental Pension Benefits (4)
 

 

 

 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation (5)
 
159,300

 
69,300

 
30,720

 
49,964

Health and Welfare Benefits (6)
 
44,265

 
68,400

 
22,162

 
21,849

Total
 
$
5,617,587

 
$
2,685,756

 
$
1,704,832

 
$
1,673,233

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Values assume two times the sum of base salary plus the highest bonus paid in the past three years, and reflect the allocation percentages in effect as of December 31, 2017 , per the terms of the key employee change of control agreement with Anadarko. Because Mr. Casas did not work the full year in 2017, his value was calculated using an assumed at-target allocated payout in 2017.
(2)  
Values assume the full-year equivalent of the applicable named executive officer’s highest annual bonus allocated to us over the past three years. The value for Mr. Casas’ highest annual bonus was based on an estimated at-target allocated payout in 2017 as he did not receive bonus payouts in the last three years.
(3)  
Reflects the in-the-money value of unvested stock options, the value of unvested restricted stock shares and restricted stock units and the estimated current value of unvested performance units (based on performance to date) granted under Anadarko equity plans, all as of December 31, 2017 . Upon a Change of Control, the value of unvested performance units would be calculated based on Anadarko’s total shareholder return performance and stock price at the time of the Change of Control and converted into restricted stock units of the surviving company. In the event of an involuntary not for cause termination or voluntary for good reason termination within two years following a Change of Control, the units will generally be paid on the first business day that is at least six months and one day following the separation from service. In the event of an involuntary not for cause or voluntary for good reason termination that is more than two years following a Change of Control, the units will be paid at the end of the original performance period. The equity awards granted on and after November 10, 2016, contain a non-disclosure covenant (indefinite duration) and non-disparagement and employee non-solicitation covenants (one year). All values reflect each named executive officer’s allocation percentage as of December 31, 2017 .
(4)  
Under the terms of the change of control agreement, our named executive officers would receive a special retirement benefit enhancement that is equivalent to the additional supplemental pension benefits that would have accrued under Anadarko’s retirement plan assuming the applicable named executive officer was eligible for subsidized early retirement benefits and include additional special pension credits. The value of this benefit has not been included in this table as Anadarko does not allocate expense to the Partnership for distribution of these benefits. If Anadarko were to allocate this expense to the Partnership, assuming the allocation percentages in effect as of December 31, 2017 , the expense would be as follows: Mr. Fink—$110,181, Mr. Casas—$71,406, Mr. Collins—$255,189, and Mr. Peacock—$31,850.
(5)  
The values reflect an additional two years of employer contributions into the savings restoration plan at their current contribution rate to the Plan and are based on their allocation percentages in effect as of December 31, 2017 , per the terms of their key employee change of control agreements with Anadarko.
(6)  
The values represent 24 months of health and welfare benefit coverage. These amounts are present values determined in accordance with GAAP and reflect the allocation percentages as of December 31, 2017 .

Disability
 
 
Mr. Fink
 
Mr. Casas
 
Mr. Collins
 
Mr. Peacock
Cash Severance
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Accelerated Anadarko Equity Awards (1)
 
3,474,522

 
1,448,031

 
1,056,450

 
1,014,466

Health and Welfare Benefits (2)
 
210,290

 
161,535

 
83,006

 
77,115

Total
 
$
3,684,812

 
$
1,609,566

 
$
1,139,456

 
$
1,091,581

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Reflects the in-the-money value of unvested stock options, the value of unvested restricted stock shares and restricted stock units and the estimated current value of unvested performance units (based on performance to date) granted under Anadarko equity plans, all as of December 31, 2017 . In the event of a termination as a result of disability, performance units would be paid after the end of the applicable performance period, based on actual performance. The equity awards granted on and after November 10, 2016, contain a non-disclosure covenant (indefinite duration) and non-disparagement and employee non-solicitation covenants (one year). All values reflect each named executive officer’s allocation percentage as of December 31, 2017 .
(2)  
Values reflect the continuation of additional death benefit coverage provided to certain employees of Anadarko until age 65. All amounts are present values determined in accordance with GAAP and reflect each named executive officer’s allocation percentage as of December 31, 2017 .


174

Table of Contents

Death
 
 
Mr. Fink
 
Mr. Casas
 
Mr. Collins
 
Mr. Peacock
Cash Severance
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Accelerated Anadarko Equity Awards (1)
 
3,979,972

 
1,448,031

 
1,139,485

 
1,069,854

Life Insurance Proceeds (2)
 
1,483,924

 
1,142,622

 
568,838

 
535,862

Total
 
$
5,463,896

 
$
2,590,653

 
$
1,708,323

 
$
1,605,716

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Reflects the in-the-money value of unvested stock options, the target value of unvested performance units, and the value of unvested restricted stock shares and restricted stock units granted under Anadarko equity plans, all as of December 31, 2017 . All values reflect each named executive officer’s allocation percentage as of December 31, 2017 .
(2)  
Values include amounts payable under additional death benefits provided to certain employees of Anadarko. These liabilities are not insured, but are self-funded by Anadarko. Proceeds are not exempt from federal taxes. Values shown include an additional tax gross-up amount to equate benefits with non-taxable life insurance proceeds. Values are based on each named executive officer’s allocation percentage as of December 31, 2017 , and exclude death benefit proceeds from programs available to all employees.

CEO Pay Ratio

Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, require disclosure regarding the relationship of the annual compensation of our employees and the annual compensation of Mr. Benjamin M. Fink, our Chief Executive Officer (CEO). As discussed in the Employees section in Business and Properties under Part I, Items 1 and 2 of this form 10-K, we have no employees. Nonetheless, in an effort to comply with this requirement, the pay ratio provided below has been calculated as the total 2017 annual compensation for Mr. Fink, divided by the total annual compensation of the median employee providing services to the Partnership pursuant to (i) the Services and Secondment Agreement and (ii) the Omnibus Agreement, in each case on an unallocated (100%) basis. For 2017, the ratio resulting from this calculation was 32 to 1.

Director Compensation

Officers or employees of Anadarko who also serve as directors of our general partner do not receive additional compensation for their service as a director of our general partner. Non-employee directors of our general partner receive compensation for their board service and for attending meetings of the Board of Directors and committees of the Board pursuant to a director compensation plan approved by the Board of Directors. From January 1, 2017 through May 31, 2017, such compensation consisted of the following:

an annual retainer of $90,000 for each board member;

an annual retainer of $2,000 for each member of the Audit Committee, or $22,000 for the Committee chair;

an annual retainer of $2,000 for each member of the Special Committee, or $22,000 for the Committee chair;

a fee of $2,000 for each board meeting attended;

a fee of $2,000 for each committee meeting attended; and

annual grants of phantom units with a value of approximately $90,000 on the date of grant, all of which vest 100% on the first anniversary of the date of grant (with vesting to be accelerated upon a change of control of our general partner or Anadarko).

In addition, each non-employee director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings of the Board of Directors or committees and for costs associated with participation in continuing director education programs. Each director is fully indemnified by us, pursuant to individual indemnification agreements and our partnership agreement, for actions associated with being a director to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law.


175

Table of Contents

On May 31, 2017, the Board of Directors approved a new compensation plan for our non-employee directors. The above compensation plan was modified as follows:

the annual retainer was increased to $110,000 for each board member;

the per-meeting fee of $2,000 for each board and committee meeting attended will be paid only to the extent a board member attends in excess of 10 total board and committee meetings in one calendar year; and

the value of the annual grant of phantom units was increased to approximately $100,000 on the date of grant. The non-employee directors received such a grant of phantom units on May 31, 2017.

In all other respects, the non-employee director compensation plan remains unchanged.

The following table sets forth information concerning total director compensation earned during 2017 by each non-employee director:
Name
 
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
 
Stock Awards  (1)
 
Option Awards
 
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
 
All Other Compensation
 
Total
Steven D. Arnold
 
$
116,000

 
$
100,035

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
216,035

Milton Carroll
 
130,000

 
100,035

 

 

 

 
230,035

James R. Crane
 
116,000

 
100,035

 

 

 

 
216,035

David J. Tudor
 
130,000

 
100,035

 

 

 

 
230,035

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
The amounts included in the Stock Awards column represent the grant date fair value of non-option awards made to directors in 2017 , computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. As of December 31, 2017 , each of the non-employee directors had 1,795 outstanding phantom units.

The following table contains the grant date fair value of phantom unit awards made to each non-employee director during 2017 :
Name
 
Grant Date
 
Phantom Units (#)
 
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (1)
Steven D. Arnold
 
May 31
 
1,795

 
100,035

Milton Carroll
 
May 31
 
1,795

 
100,035

James R. Crane
 
May 31
 
1,795

 
100,035

David J. Tudor
 
May 31
 
1,795

 
100,035

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
The amounts included in the Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards column represent the grant date fair value of the awards made to non-employee directors in 2017 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The value ultimately realized by a director upon the actual vesting of the award(s) may or may not be equal to the determined value.


176

Table of Contents

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

As previously discussed, our Board of Directors is not required to maintain, and does not maintain, a compensation committee. Messrs. Gwin, Fink, Brown and Reeves, who are directors of our general partner, are also executive or corporate officers of Anadarko. However, all compensation decisions with respect to each of these persons are made by Anadarko and none of these individuals receive any compensation directly from us or our general partner for their service as directors. Read Part III, Item 13 below in this Form 10-K for information about relationships among us, our general partner and Anadarko.

Compensation Committee Report

Neither we nor our general partner has a compensation committee. The Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above and based on this review and discussion has approved it for inclusion in this Form 10-K.

The Board of Directors of Western Gas Holdings, LLC:

Robert G. Gwin
Benjamin M. Fink
Steven D. Arnold
Daniel E. Brown
Milton Carroll
James R. Crane
Robert K. Reeves
David J. Tudor


177

Table of Contents

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common units and WGP common units held by the following as of February 12, 2018 :

each member of the Board of Directors;

each named executive officer of our general partner;

all directors and officers of our general partner as a group; and

Anadarko and its affiliates.
 
 
WES
 
WGP
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)
 
Common
Units
Beneficially Owned
 
Percentage of
Common Units
Beneficially
Owned
 
Common
Units
Beneficially
Owned
 
Percentage of
Common Units
Beneficially
Owned
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (2)
 
52,143,426

 
34.17%
 
178,587,365

 
81.57%
Robert G. Gwin
 
5,000

 
*
 
100,000

 
*
Benjamin M. Fink
 
2,213

 
*
 
18,683

 
*
Jaime R. Casas
 

 
*
 

 
*
Craig W. Collins
 
480

 
*
 
400

 
*
Philip H. Peacock
 

 
*
 
7,500

 
*
Steven D. Arnold (3)
 
36,143

 
*
 
7,500

 
*
Daniel E. Brown
 

 
*
 

 
*
Milton Carroll (3) (4)
 
8,548

 
*
 

 
*
James R. Crane (3)
 
11,326

 
*
 

 
*
Robert K. Reeves
 
9,000

 
*
 
9,000

 
*
David J. Tudor (3)
 
10,724

 
*
 
7,310

 
*
All directors and executive officers
as a group (11 persons)
 
83,434

 
*
 
150,393

 
*
                                                                                                                                                                                    
*
Less than 1%
(1)  
The address for all beneficial owners in this table is 1201 Lake Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77380.
(2)  
WGP held 50,132,046 common units and other subsidiaries of Anadarko, AMM and AMH, collectively held 2,011,380 common units. Anadarko is the ultimate parent company of WGRI, AMM, AMH and WGP GP and may, therefore, be deemed to beneficially own the units held by such parties. Anadarko, through AMH, also held 13,243,883 Class C units of the Partnership.
(3)  
Does not include 1,795 unvested phantom units that were granted to each of Messrs. Arnold, Carroll, Crane, and Tudor under the WES LTIP. Phantom units granted to the independent directors of WES vest 100% on the first anniversary of the date of the grant. Each vested phantom unit entitles the holder to receive a common unit or, in the discretion of our Board of Directors, cash equal to the fair market value of a common unit. Holders of phantom units are entitled to distribution equivalents on a current basis. Holders of phantom units have no voting rights until such time as the phantom units become vested and common units are issued to such holders.
(4)  
Includes 2,000 units of the Partnership held in a margin account by Mr. Carroll.


178

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock of Anadarko owned by each of the named executive officers and directors of our general partner and all directors and executive officers of our general partner as a group as of February 12, 2018 :
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)
 
Shares of
Common Stock
Owned Directly
or Indirectly ( 2)
 
Shares
Underlying
Options
Exercisable
Within 60 Days   (2)
 
Total Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned (2)
 
Percentage of
Total Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned (2)
Robert G. Gwin (3)
 
62,394

 
278,578

 
340,972

 
*
Benjamin M. Fink (3)
 
12,513

 
52,528

 
65,041

 
*
Jaime R. Casas (3)
 

 

 

 
*
Craig W. Collins (3) (4)
 
10,113

 
5,514

 
15,627

 
*
Philip H. Peacock (3)   (4)
 
3,930

 
3,575

 
7,505

 
*
Steven D. Arnold
 
4,900

 

 
4,900

 
*
Daniel E. Brown (3)
 
17,966

 
80,672

 
98,638

 
*
Milton Carroll
 
2,000

 

 
2,000

 
*
James R. Crane
 

 

 

 
*
Robert K. Reeves (3)
 
220,510

 
217,880

 
438,390

 
*
David J. Tudor
 

 

 

 
*
All directors and executive officers
as a group (11 persons) (3)
 
334,326

 
638,747

 
973,073

 
*
                                                                                                                                                                                    
*
Less than 1%
(1)  
The address for all beneficial owners in this table is 1201 Lake Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77380.
(2)  
As of December 31, 2017 , there were 541.1 million shares of Anadarko common stock outstanding.
(3)  
Does not include unvested restricted stock units of Anadarko held by the following individuals in the amounts indicated: Robert G. Gwin—40,516; Benjamin M. Fink—37,980; Jaime R. Casas—17,074; Craig W. Collins—27,603; Philip H. Peacock—26,697; Daniel E. Brown—47,565; and Robert K. Reeves—33,050; for a total of 230,485 unvested restricted stock units held by the directors and executive officers as a group. Restricted stock units typically vest equally over three years beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant, and upon vesting are payable in Anadarko common stock, subject to applicable tax withholding. Holders of restricted stock units receive dividend equivalents on the units, but do not have voting rights. Generally, a holder will forfeit any unvested restricted units if he or she terminates voluntarily or is terminated for cause prior to the vesting date. Holders of restricted stock units have the ability to defer such awards.
(4)  
Includes 3,820 and 3,363 unvested shares of restricted common stock of Anadarko held by Craig W. Collins and Philip H. Peacock, respectively. Restricted stock awards typically vest equally over three years beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Holders of restricted stock receive dividends on the shares and also have voting rights. Generally, a holder of restricted stock will forfeit any unvested restricted shares if he or she terminates voluntarily or is terminated for cause prior to the vesting date.
 

179

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth owners of 5% or greater of our units, other than Anadarko, the holdings of which are listed in the first table of this Item 12.
Title of Class
 
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
 
Amount and
Nature
of Beneficial
Ownership
 
Percent of Class
Common Units
 
ALPS Advisors, Inc.
1290 Broadway, Suite 1100
Denver, CO 80203
 
8,329,599 (1)
 
5.46%
Common Units
 
Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C.
11550 Ash Street
Suite 300
Leawood, KS 66211
 
13,823,458 (2)
 
9.10%
Common Units
 
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
1800 Avenue of the Stars
Third Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
 
8,974,770  (3)
 
5.88%
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Based upon its Schedule 13G filed February 6, 2018 , with the SEC with respect to Partnership securities held as of December 31, 2017 , ALPS Advisors, Inc. (“ALPS”) has shared voting and dispositive power as to 8,329,599 common units and Alerian MLP ETF, a fund controlled by ALPS, also has shared voting and dispositive power as to 8,301,343 of the common units held by ALPS.
(2)  
Based upon its Schedule 13G/A filed February 13, 2018 , with the SEC with respect to WES securities held as of December 31, 2017 , Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C has shared voting power as to 11,857,986 common units and shared dispositive power as to 13,511,242 common units
(3)  
Based upon its Schedule 13G/A filed February 6, 2018 , with the SEC with respect to Partnership securities held as of December 31, 2017 , Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P. has shared voting and dispositive power as to 8,974,770 common units.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan

The following table sets forth information with respect to the securities that may be issued under the WES LTIP as of December 31, 2017 . For more information regarding the WES LTIP, which did not require approval by our unitholders, read Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Plan Category
 
(a)
Number of 
Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
 
(b)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
 
(c)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column(a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
 

 

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 
7,180

 
(1)

 
2,250,000

Total
 
7,180

 

 
2,250,000

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Phantom units constitute the only rights outstanding under the WES LTIP. Each phantom unit that may be settled in common units entitles the holder to receive, upon vesting, one common unit with respect to each phantom unit, without payment of any cash. Accordingly, there is no reportable weighted-average exercise price.


180

Table of Contents

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

As of February 12, 2018 , WGP held 50,132,046 common units, representing a 29.8% limited partner interest in us, and, through its ownership of the general partner, WGP indirectly held 2,583,068 general partner units, representing a 1.5% general partner interest in us, and 100% of the IDRs. As of February 12, 2018 , other subsidiaries of Anadarko collectively held 2,011,380 common units and 13,243,883 Class C units, representing an aggregate 9.1% limited partner interest in us.

Distributions and Payments to Our General Partner, WGP and Other Subsidiaries of Anadarko

The following table summarizes the distributions and payments made by us to our general partner, WGP and other subsidiaries of Anadarko and to be made to us by our general partner, WGP and other subsidiaries of Anadarko in connection with our ongoing operation and liquidation. These distributions and payments were determined by and among affiliated entities and, consequently, are not the result of arm’s-length negotiations.
Formation stage
 
 
 
 
 
The consideration received by Anadarko for the contribution of the assets and liabilities to us
 
5,725,431 common units; 26,536,306 subordinated units; 1,083,115 general partner units, and our IDRs.
 
 
 
Operational stage
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions of available cash to our general partner, WGP and other subsidiaries of Anadarko
 
We will generally make cash distributions to our unitholders pro rata, including WGP and other subsidiaries of Anadarko as the holders of 50,132,046 common units and 2,011,380 common units, respectively, and to our general partner as the holder of 2,583,068 general partner units. In addition, if distributions exceed the minimum quarterly distribution and other higher target distribution levels, our general partner will be entitled to increasing percentages of the distributions, up to 50.0% of the distributions above the highest target distribution level. As of December 31, 2017, the general partner was entitled to a maximum distribution sharing percentage of 49.5%, which includes distributions paid on its 1.5% general partner interest and the 48.0% IDR maximum distribution sharing percentage. See Note 3 Partnership Distributions  and Note 4—Equity and Partners'   Capital in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
 
 
 
Distributions of additional Class C units
 
In connection with the closing of the DBM acquisition in November 2014, we issued 10,913,853 Class C units. Class C units receive quarterly distributions at a rate equivalent to our common units. As of February 12, 2018, we have issued 2,330,030 PIK Class C units as quarterly distributions. For a further discussion of the Class C units, refer to Class C Unit Issuance  below.
 
 
 
Payments to our general partner and its affiliates
 
Our general partner and its affiliates are entitled to reimbursement for expenses incurred on our behalf, including salaries and employee benefit costs for employees who provide services to us, and all other necessary or appropriate expenses allocable to us or reasonably incurred by our general partner and its affiliates in connection with operating our business. The partnership agreement provides that our general partner determines in good faith the amount of such expenses that are allocable to us.
 
 
 
Withdrawal or removal of our general partner
 
If our general partner withdraws or is removed, its general partner interest and its IDRs will either be sold to the new general partner for cash or converted into common units, in each case for an amount equal to the fair market value of those interests.
 
 
 
Liquidation stage
 
 
 
 
 
Liquidation
 
Upon our liquidation, our partners, including our general partner, WGP and other subsidiaries of Anadarko, will be entitled to receive liquidating distributions according to their respective capital account balances.


181

Table of Contents

Agreements with Anadarko

We and other parties entered into various agreements with Anadarko in connection with our IPO in May 2008 and our acquisitions from Anadarko. These agreements address the acquisition of assets and the assumption of liabilities by us. These agreements were not the result of arm’s-length negotiations and, as such, they or underlying transactions may not be based on terms as favorable as those that could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

Omnibus Agreement

In connection with our IPO, we entered into an omnibus agreement with Anadarko and our general partner that addresses the following matters:

Anadarko’s obligation to indemnify us for certain liabilities and our obligation to indemnify Anadarko for certain liabilities;

our obligation to reimburse Anadarko for expenses incurred or payments made on our behalf in conjunction with Anadarko’s provision of general and administrative services to us, including salary and benefits of Anadarko personnel, our public company expenses, general and administrative expenses and salaries and benefits of our executive management who are employees of Anadarko (see Administrative services and reimbursement below for details regarding certain agreements for amounts reimbursed in 2017 ); and

our obligation to reimburse Anadarko for all insurance coverage expenses it incurs or payments it makes with respect to our assets.

The table below reflects the categories of expenses for which we were obligated to reimburse Anadarko pursuant to the omnibus agreement for the year ended December 31, 2017 :
thousands
 
Year Ended 
 December 31, 2017
Reimbursement of general and administrative expenses
 
$
31,733

Reimbursement of public company expenses
 
9,379

Total reimbursement
 
$
41,112


Any or all of the provisions of the omnibus agreement are terminable by Anadarko at its option if our general partner is removed without cause and units held by our general partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor of that removal. The omnibus agreement will also generally terminate in the event of a change of control of us or our general partner. See Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Administrative services and reimbursement. Under the omnibus agreement, we reimburse Anadarko for the payment of certain operating expenses and for the provision of various general and administrative services for our benefit with respect to the assets Anadarko contributed to us concurrently with the closing of our May 2008 IPO, consisting of the initial assets, and for subsequent acquisitions. The omnibus agreement further provides that we reimburse Anadarko for all expenses it incurs or payments it makes with respect to our assets.
Pursuant to these arrangements, Anadarko performs centralized corporate functions for us, such as legal; accounting; treasury; cash management; investor relations; insurance administration and claims processing; risk management; health, safety and environmental; information technology; human resources; credit; payroll; internal audit; tax; marketing and midstream administration. We reimburse Anadarko for expenses it incurs or payments it makes on our behalf, including salaries and benefits of Anadarko personnel, our public company expenses, our general and administrative expenses and salaries and benefits of our executive management who are also employees of Anadarko. Under our partnership and omnibus agreements, we reimburse Anadarko for general and administrative expenses allocated, as determined by Anadarko in its reasonable discretion.


182

Table of Contents

Indemnification with respect to initial assets. Under the omnibus agreement, Anadarko agreed to indemnify us against certain environmental, title and operation matters associated with our initial assets. We have claimed no indemnities under the omnibus agreement prior to the date hereof. Other than with respect to certain tax liabilities attributable to assets or liabilities retained by Anadarko, the indemnification obligations under the omnibus agreement have expired.

Indemnification Agreements with Directors and Officers

Our general partner entered into indemnification agreements with each of its officers and directors (each, an Indemnitee). Each indemnification agreement provides that our general partner will indemnify and hold harmless each Indemnitee against all expense, liability and loss (including attorney’s fees, judgments, fines or penalties and amounts to be paid in settlement) actually and reasonably incurred or suffered by the Indemnitee in connection with serving in their capacity as officers and directors of our general partner (or of any subsidiary of our general partner) or in any capacity at the request of our general partner or its Board of Directors to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, including Section 18-108 of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act in effect on the date of the agreement or as such laws may be amended to provide more advantageous rights to the Indemnitee. The indemnification agreements also provide that our general partner must advance payment of certain expenses to the Indemnitee, including fees of counsel, in advance of final disposition of any proceeding subject to receipt of an undertaking from the Indemnitee to return such advance if it is ultimately determined that the Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification.
Through December 31, 2017 , there have been no payments or claims to Anadarko related to indemnifications and no payments or claims have been received from Anadarko related to indemnifications.

Services and Secondment Agreement

In connection with our IPO, Anadarko and our general partner entered into a services and secondment agreement, pursuant to which specified employees of Anadarko are seconded to our general partner to provide operating, routine maintenance and other services with respect to the assets we own and operate under the direction, supervision and control of our general partner. Pursuant to the services and secondment agreement, we reimburse Anadarko for services provided by the seconded employees. The initial term of the services and secondment agreement extends through May 2018 and the term will automatically extend for additional twelve-month periods unless either party provides 180 days written notice of termination before the applicable twelve-month period expires.

Tax Sharing Agreement

In connection with our IPO, we entered into a tax sharing agreement pursuant to which we reimburse Anadarko for our estimated share of taxes from all forms of taxation, excluding taxes imposed by the United States. Taxes for which we reimburse Anadarko include state taxes attributable to our income, which are directly borne by Anadarko through its filing of a combined or consolidated tax return with respect to periods beginning on and subsequent to our acquisition of the Partnership assets, which refers to the assets owned and interests accounted for under the equity method by us as of December 31, 2017 . Anadarko may use its own tax attributes to reduce or eliminate the tax liability of its combined or consolidated group, which may include us as a member. However, under this circumstance, we nevertheless are required to reimburse Anadarko for our allocable share of taxes that would have been owed had tax attributes not been available to Anadarko.

Related-Party Acquisition Agreements

In connection with the acquisition of assets from Anadarko, we regularly enter into contribution or purchase and sale agreements with Anadarko and its affiliates. These agreements typically provide for payment by us to Anadarko of a purchase price in the form of cash and issuance of common units.
Pursuant to such related-party acquisition agreements, Anadarko has agreed to indemnify us and our respective affiliates (other than any of the entities controlled by Anadarko), shareholders, unitholders, members, directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives against certain losses resulting from any breach of Anadarko’s representations, warranties, covenants or agreements, and for certain other matters. We have agreed to indemnify Anadarko and its respective affiliates (other than us and our respective security holders, officers, directors and employees) and their respective security holders, officers, directors and employees against certain losses resulting from any breach of our representations, warranties, covenants or agreements made in such agreements.


183

Table of Contents

The Board of Directors approved the acquisition of the Partnership assets from Anadarko, based in part on the recommendations in favor of the acquisitions from, and the granting of special approval under our partnership agreement by, the Board’s Special Committee. The Special Committee, a committee of independent members of our Board of Directors, retains independent legal and financial advisors to assist it in evaluating and negotiating the acquisitions as it deems necessary on a transaction-by-transaction basis.

Chipeta LLC Agreement

In connection with the acquisition of our interest in Chipeta, we became party to the Chipeta LLC agreement, together with a third-party member. Among other things, the Chipeta LLC agreement provides the following:

Chipeta’s members will be required from time to time to make capital contributions to Chipeta to the extent approved by the members in connection with Chipeta’s annual budget;

Chipeta will distribute available cash, as defined in the Chipeta LLC agreement, if any, to its members quarterly in accordance with those members’ membership interests; and

Chipeta’s membership interests are subject to significant restrictions on transfer.

We are the managing member of Chipeta. As managing member, we manage the day-to-day operations of Chipeta and receive a management fee from the other member, which is intended to compensate the managing member for the performance of its duties. We may be removed as the managing member only if we are grossly negligent or fraudulent, breach our primary duties or fail to respond in a commercially reasonable manner to written business proposals from the other members, and such behavior, breach or failure has a material adverse effect to Chipeta.

Commodity Price Swap Agreements

We have commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko to mitigate exposure to a majority of the commodity price risk inherent in our percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts. Notional volumes for each of the commodity price swap agreements are not specifically defined. Instead, the commodity price swap agreements apply to the actual volume of our natural gas, condensate and NGLs purchased and sold. On December 20, 2017 , we renewed our commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko for the DJ Basin complex and the MGR assets through December 31, 2018, with an effective date of January 1, 2018. See Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A and Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Gathering and Processing Agreements

We have significant gathering and processing arrangements with affiliates of Anadarko on a majority of our systems. For the year ended December 31, 2017 , 34% of our natural gas gathering, treating and transportation throughput and 41% of our natural gas processing throughput, was attributable to production owned or controlled by Anadarko, in each case exclusive of its equity investment throughput. For the year ended December 31, 2017 , 56% of our crude oil, NGL and produced water gathering, treating, transportation and disposal throughput was attributable to production owned or controlled by Anadarko, exclusive of its equity investment throughput.

Commodity Purchase and Sale Agreements

We sell a significant amount of our natural gas, condensate and NGLs to AESC, Anadarko’s marketing affiliate. In addition, we purchase natural gas, condensate and NGLs from AESC pursuant to purchase agreements. Our purchase and sale agreements with AESC are generally one-year contracts, subject to annual renewal.


184

Table of Contents

Class C Unit Issuance

As discussed above, we issued 10,913,853 Class C units to AMH, a subsidiary of Anadarko, at a price of $68.72 per unit, pursuant to the Unit Purchase Agreement with Anadarko and AMH. All outstanding Class C units will convert into common units on a one-for-one basis on March 1, 2020 unless we elect to convert such units earlier or Anadarko extends the conversion date. The distributions that Class C units receive are paid in the form of additional PIK Class C units until the scheduled conversion date on March 1, 2020 (unless earlier converted), and the Class C units are disregarded with respect to distributions of available cash until they are converted into common units. The number of additional PIK Class C units to be issued in connection with a distribution payable on the Class C units is determined by dividing the corresponding distribution attributable to the Class C units by the volume-weighted-average price of our common units for the ten days immediately preceding the payment date for the common unit distribution, less a 6% discount. As of February 12, 2018 , 2,330,030 PIK Class C units have been issued as quarterly distributions. The terms of the Class C unit issuance were unanimously approved by the Board of Directors and by the Board’s Special Committee. For more information, see Note 4—Equity and Partners’ Capital in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Equipment Purchases and Sales

The following table summarizes the purchases from and sales to Anadarko of pipe and equipment:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
thousands
 
Purchases
 
Sales
Cash consideration
 
$
3,910

 
$
3,965

 
$
10,903

 
$

 
$
623

 
$
925

Net carrying value
 
(5,283
)
 
(3,366
)
 
(6,318
)
 

 
(605
)
 
(972
)
Partners’ capital adjustment
 
$
(1,373
)
 
$
599

 
$
4,585

 
$

 
$
18

 
$
(47
)

Contributions in Aid of Construction Costs from Affiliates

On certain of our capital projects, Anadarko is obligated to reimburse us for all or a portion of project capital expenditures. The majority of such arrangements are associated with projects related to pipeline construction activities and production well tie-ins. The cash receipts resulting from such reimbursements are presented as “Contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates” within the investing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of the expected impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) will have on future aid in construction costs.

Indemnification Agreements

All notes and obligations under the RCF are recourse to our general partner. Our general partner is indemnified by wholly owned subsidiaries of Anadarko against any claims made against our general partner for our long-term debt and/or borrowings under the RCF.


185

Table of Contents

Summary of Affiliate Transactions

Revenues from affiliates include amounts earned by us from services provided to Anadarko as well as from the sale of residue and NGLs to Anadarko. In addition, we purchase natural gas from an affiliate of Anadarko pursuant to gas purchase agreements. Operating and maintenance expense includes amounts accrued for or paid to affiliates for the operation of our assets, whether in providing services to affiliates or to third parties, including field labor, measurement and analysis, and other disbursements. A portion of our general and administrative expenses is paid by Anadarko, which results in affiliate transactions pursuant to the reimbursement provisions of the omnibus agreement. Affiliate expenses do not bear a direct relationship to affiliate revenues, and third-party expenses do not bear a direct relationship to third-party revenues.
The following table summarizes material affiliate transactions (see Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues and other (1)
 
$
1,365,318

 
$
1,228,232

 
$
1,220,639

Equity income, net – affiliates (1)
 
85,194

 
78,717

 
71,251

Cost of product (1)
 
86,010

 
80,455

 
167,354

Operation and maintenance (2)
 
72,489

 
72,330

 
77,061

General and administrative (3)
 
39,130

 
38,066

 
33,903

Operating expenses
 
197,629

 
190,851

 
278,318

Interest income (4)
 
16,900

 
16,900

 
16,900

Interest expense (5)
 
71

 
(7,747
)
 
14,398

Settlement of the Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (6)
 
(37,346
)
 

 

Proceeds from the issuance of common units, net of offering expenses (7)
 

 
25,000

 

Distributions to unitholders (8)
 
452,777

 
382,711

 
314,200

Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (9)
 
58,551

 
45,820

 
18,449

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1)  
Represents amounts earned or incurred on and subsequent to the date of acquisition of our assets, as well as amounts earned or incurred by Anadarko on a historical basis related to our assets prior to the acquisition of such assets, recognized under gathering, treating or processing agreements, and purchase and sale agreements.
(2)  
Represents expenses incurred on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of our assets, as well as expenses incurred by Anadarko on a historical basis related to our assets prior to the acquisition of such assets.
(3)  
Represents general and administrative expense incurred on and subsequent to the date of acquisition of our assets, as well as a management services fee for reimbursement of expenses incurred by Anadarko for periods prior to the acquisition of our assets by us. These amounts include equity-based compensation expense allocated to us by Anadarko and amounts charged by Anadarko under the omnibus agreement. See Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
(4)  
Represents interest income recognized on the note receivable from Anadarko.
(5)  
Includes amounts related to the Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko. See Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures and Note 12—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K .
(6)  
Represents the cash payment to Anadarko for the settlement of the Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko. See Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
(7)  
Represents proceeds from the issuance of 835,841 common units to WGP as partial funding for the acquisition of Springfield. See Note 2—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K .
(8)  
Represents distributions paid under the partnership agreement. See Note 3—Partnership Distributions and Note 4—Equity and Partners’ Capital in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
(9)  
See Note 5—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for more information.


186

Table of Contents

Other

In 2017 , Anadarko made payments totaling approximately $218,000 to the Houston Astros Baseball Club. James R. Crane, a member of the Board of Directors, is the principal owner and Chairman of the Houston Astros.

Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of interest exist and may arise in the future as a result of the relationships between our general partner and its affiliates, including WGP and Anadarko, on the one hand, and our partnership and our limited partners, on the other hand. The directors and officers of our general partner have fiduciary duties to manage our general partner in a manner beneficial to its owner (WGP). At the same time, our general partner also has duties to manage our partnership in a manner beneficial to us and our unitholders.
Whenever a conflict arises between our general partner or its affiliates, on the one hand, and us and our limited partners, on the other hand, our general partner will resolve the conflict. Our partnership agreement contains provisions that modify and limit our general partner’s default state law fiduciary duties to our unitholders. Our partnership agreement also restricts the remedies available to our unitholders for actions taken by our general partner that, without those limitations, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duties otherwise applicable under state law. See Special Committee under Part III, Item 10 of this Form 10-K.
Our general partner will not be in breach of its obligations under the partnership agreement or its duties to us or our unitholders if the resolution of the conflict is any of the following:

approved by the Special Committee of our general partner, although our general partner is not obligated to seek such approval;

approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding common units, excluding any common units owned by our general partner or any of its affiliates;

on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or

fair and reasonable to us, taking into account the totality of the relationships among the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to us.

Our general partner may, but is not required to, seek the approval of such resolution from the Special Committee of its Board of Directors. In connection with a situation involving a conflict of interest, any determination by our general partner involving the resolution of the conflict of interest must be made in good faith, provided that, if our general partner does not seek approval from the Special Committee and its Board of Directors determines that the resolution or course of action taken with respect to the conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth in the third and fourth bullet points above, then it will be presumed that, in making its decision, the Board of Directors acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or the Partnership, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such presumption. Unless the resolution of a conflict is specifically provided for in our partnership agreement, our general partner or the Special Committee may consider any factors that it determines in good faith to be appropriate when resolving a conflict. Our partnership agreement provides that for someone to act in good faith, that person must reasonably believe he is acting in the best interests of the Partnership.
Additionally, the Board of Directors has adopted a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”), under which all directors and officers of the general partner, and employees working on our behalf, are expected to avoid conflicts or the appearance of conflicts in relation to their duties and responsibilities to us, and report any violation of the Code by any person. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, any waivers of the Code for any officer or director may only be made by the Board of Directors or by a committee of the Board of Directors composed of independent directors.


187

Table of Contents

Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services

We have engaged KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. The following table presents fees for the audit of the Partnership’s annual consolidated financial statements for the last two fiscal years and for other services provided by KPMG LLP:
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
Audit fees
 
$
1,141

 
$
1,020

Audit-related fees
 
380

 
690

Total
 
$
1,521

 
$
1,710


Audit fees are primarily for the audit of the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements, including the audit of the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting, and the reviews of the Partnership’s financial statements included in the Forms 10-Q.
Audit-related fees are primarily for other audits, consents, comfort letters and certain financial accounting consultation.

Audit Committee Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services

The Audit Committee of the Partnership’s general partner has adopted a Pre-Approval Policy with respect to services that may be performed by KPMG LLP. This policy lists specific audit-related services as well as any other services that KPMG LLP is authorized to perform and sets out specific dollar limits for each specific service, which may not be exceeded without additional Audit Committee authorization. The Audit Committee receives quarterly reports on the status of expenditures pursuant to that Pre-Approval Policy. The Audit Committee reviews the policy at least annually in order to approve services and limits for the current year. Any service that is not clearly enumerated in the policy must receive specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee or by its Chairman, to whom such authority has been conditionally delegated, prior to engagement. During 2017 , no fees for services outside the scope of audit, review, or attestation that exceed the waiver provisions of 17 CFR 210.2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) were approved by the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee has approved the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm to conduct the audit of the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 .


188

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) Financial Statements

Our consolidated financial statements are included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. For a listing of these statements and accompanying footnotes, see the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

Financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not required, not applicable, or the information is included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

(a)(3) Exhibits

Exhibit Index
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
2.1#
 
2.2#
 
2.3#
 
2.4#
 
2.5#
 
2.6#
 
2.7#
 
2.8#
 

189

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
 
Description
2.9#
 
2.10#
 
2.11#
 
2.12#
 
2.13#
 
2.14#
 
3.1
 
3.2
 
3.3
 
3.4
 
3.5
 
3.6
 
3.7
 
4.1
 
4.2
 
4.3
 

190

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
 
Description
4.4
 
4.5
 
4.6
 
4.7
 
4.8
 
4.9
 
4.10
 
4.11
 
4.12
 
4.13
 
4.14
 
4.15
 
4.16
 
10.1
 
10.2
 
10.3
 
10.4
 
10.5
 

191

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
 
Description
10.6
 
10.7
 
10.8
 
10.9
 
10.10
 
10.11
 
10.12‡
 
10.13‡
 
10.14‡
 
10.15‡
 
10.16‡
 
10.17†
 
10.18
 
10.19
 
10.20
 
10.21*
 
10.22
 
10.23*
 

192

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
 
Description
10.24
 
10.25
 
10.26
 
10.27†
 
10.28†
 
10.29†*
 
10.30
 
12.1*
 
21.1*
 
23.1*
 
31.1*
 
31.2*
 
32.1**
 
101.INS*
 
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*
 
XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL*
 
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*
 
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*
 
XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*
 
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
                                                                                                                                                                                    
*
Filed herewith
**
Furnished herewith
#
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Portions of this exhibit, which was previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, were omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. The omitted portions were filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed pursuant to Item 15.

Item 16.  Form 10-K Summary

Not applicable.

193

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
 
 
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
 
 
February 16, 2018
 
 
 
 
/s/ Jaime R. Casas
 
Jaime R. Casas
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Western Gas Holdings, LLC
(as general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP)

Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Benjamin M. Fink and Jaime R. Casas, and each of them, either one of whom may act without joinder of the other, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all, exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each, and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, or the substitute or substitutes of any or all of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


194

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 16, 2018 .

Signature
Title (Position with Western Gas Holdings, LLC)
 
 
/s/ Robert G. Gwin
Chairman and Director
Robert G. Gwin
 
 
 
/s/ Benjamin M. Fink
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Benjamin M. Fink
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
/s/ Jaime R. Casas
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Jaime R. Casas
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 
/s/ Daniel E. Brown
Director
Daniel E. Brown
 
 
 
/s/ Robert K. Reeves
Director
Robert K. Reeves
 
 
 
/s/ Steven D. Arnold
Director
Steven D. Arnold
 
 
 
/s/ Milton Carroll
Director
Milton Carroll
 
 
 
/s/ James R. Crane
Director
James R. Crane
 
 
 
/s/ David J. Tudor
Director
David J. Tudor
 


195

EXHIBIT 10.21




THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT
Dated as of February 15, 2018
among
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP,
as Borrower,
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Administrative Agent,
THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD., CITIBANK, N.A.,
MIZUHO BANK, LTD., PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AND
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Syndication Agents,
BANK OF MONTREAL, BARCLAYS BANK PLC,
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY,
CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH,
DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, MORGAN STANLEY BANK, N.A., ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, AND
THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK, NEW YORK BRANCH,
as Documentation Agents
and
THE LENDERS PARTY HERETO

WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC,
THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD.,
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., MIZUHO BANK, LTD.,
PNC CAPITAL MARKETS LLC AND U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners






TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
 
ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND ACCOUNTING TERMS
 
1
 
Section 1.01
 
Defined Terms
1
 
Section 1.02
 
Use of Defined Terms
20
 
Section 1.03
 
Accounting Terms
20
 
Section 1.04
 
Interpretation
20
 
Section 1.05
 
Rates
20
 
 
 
 
 
 
ARTICLE II AMOUNT AND TERMS OF LOANS
20
 
Section 2.01
 
Loans
20
 
Section 2.02
 
Repayment of Loans; Evidence of Debt
21
 
Section 2.03
 
Procedure for Borrowing
22
 
Section 2.04
 
Facility Fees and LC Fees
22
 
Section 2.05
 
Letters of Credit
23
 
Section 2.06
 
Reduction or Termination of Commitments
28
 
Section 2.07
 
Optional Prepayments
29
 
Section 2.08
 
Mandatory Prepayments
29
 
Section 2.09
 
Commitment Increases
29
 
Section 2.10
 
Interest
31
 
Section 2.11
 
Computation of Interest and Fees
32
 
Section 2.12
 
Funding of Borrowings
33
 
Section 2.13
 
Pro Rata Treatment and Payments
34
 
Section 2.14
 
Increased Cost of Loans
35
 
Section 2.15
 
Illegality
37
 
Section 2.16
 
Taxes
38
 
Section 2.17
 
Substitute Loan Basis
42
 
Section 2.18
 
Certain Prepayments or Continuations
42
 
Section 2.19
 
Certain Notices
42
 
Section 2.20
 
Minimum Amounts of Eurodollar Borrowings
43
 
Section 2.21
 
Break Funding Payments
43
 
Section 2.22
 
Swingline Loans
43
 
Section 2.23
 
Defaulting Lenders
45
 
Section 2.24
 
Extension of Maturity
47
 
Section 2.25
 
Alternate Rate of Interest
48
 
 
 
 
 
 
ARTICLE III REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
 
49
 
Section 3.01
 
Representations of the Borrower
49
 
 
 
 
 
 
ARTICLE IV AFFIRMATIVE COVENANTS
 
51
 
Section 4.01
 
Financial Statements and Other Information
51

i



 
Section 4.02
 
Notices of Material Events
52
 
Section 4.03
 
Compliance with Laws
53
 
Section 4.04
 
Use of Proceeds
 
53
 
Section 4.05
 
Maintenance of Property; Insurance
 
53
 
Section 4.06
 
Books and Records; Inspections
 
53
 
Section 4.07
 
Payment of Obligations
 
54
 
Section 4.08
 
Material Contracts
 
54
 
Section 4.09
 
EEA Financial Institution
 
54
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ARTICLE V FINANCIAL COVENANT
 
55
 
Section 5.01
 
Consolidated Leverage Ratio
 
55
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ARTICLE VI NEGATIVE COVENANTS
 
55
 
Section 6.01
 
Nature of Business
 
55
 
Section 6.02
 
Liens
 
55
 
Section 6.03
 
Transactions with Affiliates
 
57
 
Section 6.04
 
Indebtedness
 
58
 
Section 6.05
 
Restricted Payments
 
58
 
Section 6.06
 
[Reserved]
 
58
 
Section 6.07
 
Limitations on Sales and Leasebacks
 
58
 
Section 6.08
 
Fundamental Changes
 
59
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ARTICLE VII CONDITIONS OF LENDING
 
59
 
Section 7.01
 
Conditions Precedent to Effectiveness
 
59
 
Section 7.02
 
Conditions Precedent to Loans
 
61
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ARTICLE VIII EVENTS OF DEFAULT
 
61
 
Section 8.01
 
Events of Default
 
61
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ARTICLE IX THE AGENTS
 
 
 
Section 9.01
 
Appointment and Authority
 
63
 
Section 9.02
 
Exculpatory Provisions
 
63
 
Section 9.03
 
Reliance by Administrative Agent
 
64
 
Section 9.04
 
Delegation of Duties
 
65
 
Section 9.05
 
Right to Indemnity
 
65
 
Section 9.06
 
Rights as a Lender
 
65
 
Section 9.07
 
Non-Reliance on Administrative Agent and Other Lenders
66
 
Section 9.08
 
Events of Default
 
66
 
Section 9.09
 
Resignation of Administrative Agent
 
66
 
Section 9.10
 
No Other Duties, Etc.
 
67
 
Section 9.11
 
Administrative Agent May File Proofs of Claim
 
67
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ARTICLE X MISCELLANEOUS
 
68
 
Section 10.01
 
Notices
 
68
 
Section 10.02
 
Waivers; Amendments
 
69

ii



 
Section 10.03
 
Expenses; Indemnity; Damage Waiver
 
71
 
Section 10.04
 
Successors and Assigns
 
72
 
Section 10.05
 
Survival
 
77
 
Section 10.06
 
Counterparts; Integration; Effectiveness
 
77
 
Section 10.07
 
Severability
 
77
 
Section 10.08
 
Right of Setoff
 
77
 
Section 10.09
 
Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Consent to Service of Process
78
 
Section 10.10
 
WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL
 
79
 
Section 10.11
 
Headings
 
79
 
Section 10.12
 
Confidentiality
 
79
 
Section 10.13
 
Replacement of Lenders
 
80
 
Section 10.14
 
USA Patriot Act Notice
 
81
 
Section 10.15
 
No Advisory or Fiduciary Responsibility
 
81
 
Section 10.16
 
Amendment and Restatement
 
82
 
Section 10.17
 
Acknowledgment and Consent to Bail-In of EEA Financial Institution
82

Annex I
(List of Commitments)
Annex II
(Maximum LC Issuance Amounts)
 
 
Schedule I
(Pricing Schedule)
Schedule II
(Affiliate Agreements)
Schedule III
(Existing Letters of Credit)
 
 
Exhibit A
(Form of Note)
Exhibit B
(Form of Assignment and Assumption)
Exhibit C
(Form of Notice of Commitment Increase)

Exhibit D-1
(Form of U.S. Tax Certificate for Foreign Lenders That Are Not Partnerships)
Exhibit D-2
(Form of U.S. Tax Certificate for Foreign Participants That Are Not Partnerships)
Exhibit D-3
(Form of U.S. Tax Certificate for Foreign Participants That Are Partnerships)
Exhibit D-4
(Form of U.S. Tax Certificate for Foreign Lenders That Are Partnerships)


iii



This THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT is made as of February 15, 2018 (the “ Effective Date ”), by and among WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP, a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “ Borrower ”), WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, individually and as Administrative Agent (herein, together with its successors in such capacity, the “ Administrative Agent ”), THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD., CITIBANK, N.A., MIZUHO BANK, LTD., PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Syndication Agents ( herein, together with their respective successors and assigns in such capacity, each a Syndication Agent ”) , BANK OF MONTREAL, BARCLAYS BANK PLC, BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, MORGAN STANLEY BANK, N.A., ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, and THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK, NEW YORK BRANCH, as Documentation Agents (herein, together with their respective successors and assigns in such capacity, each a “ Documentation Agent ”), and each of the Lenders that is a signatory hereto or which becomes a party hereto pursuant to Section 2.09 or Section 10.04, other than any such Person that ceases to be a party hereto pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption (individually, together with its successors and assigns, each a “ Lender ” and collectively, the “ Lenders ”).
WHEREAS, the Borrower, the lenders party thereto, the Administrative Agent and the other parties thereto entered into the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement (as defined below); and
WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested and the Lenders have consented to the amendment and restatement of the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement, and the renewal and extension of all obligations and Indebtedness thereunder.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree that the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement is amended and restated as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS AND ACCOUNTING TERMS
Section 1.01      Defined Terms . As used in this Agreement, and unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the meanings set out respectively after each:
Acquired Indebtedness ” — (i) with respect to any Person that becomes a Subsidiary after the Effective Date as the result of an Acquisition, Indebtedness of such Person and its Subsidiaries (including, for the avoidance of doubt, Indebtedness incurred in the ordinary course of such Person’s business to acquire assets used or useful in its business) existing at the time such Person becomes a Subsidiary that was not incurred in connection with, or in contemplation of, such Person becoming a Subsidiary and (ii) with respect to the Borrower or any Subsidiary, any Indebtedness of a Person (including, for the avoidance of doubt, Indebtedness incurred in the ordinary course of such Person’s business to acquire assets used or useful in its business), other than the Borrower or a Subsidiary, existing at the time such Person is merged with or into the Borrower or a Subsidiary, or Indebtedness expressly assumed by the Borrower or any Subsidiary in connection with the acquisition of an asset

1



or assets from such Person, which Indebtedness was not, in any case, incurred by such other Person in connection with, or in contemplation of, such merger or acquisition.
Acquisition ” — the acquisition by any Person, in a single transaction or in a series of related transactions, of property or assets (other than capital expenditures in the ordinary course of business) of, or of a business unit or division of, another Person or at least a majority of the Equity Interests having ordinary voting power for the election of directors, managing general partners or the equivalent of another Person, in each case whether or not involving a merger or consolidation with such other Person and whether for cash, property, services, assumption of Indebtedness, securities or otherwise.
Administrative Agent ” — as defined in the preamble hereof.
Administrative Questionnaire ” — an Administrative Questionnaire in a form supplied by the Administrative Agent.
Affected Loans ” — as defined in Section 2.18.
Affiliate ” — with respect to any Person, another Person that directly or indirectly (through one or more intermediaries) Controls or is Controlled by or is under common Control with the Person specified.
Agent Parties ” — as defined in Section 10.01(d).
Agents ” — each of the Administrative Agent, the Syndication Agents and the Documentation Agents.
Agreement ” — this Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, as the same may from time to time be amended, modified, supplemented or restated.
Alternate Base Rate ” — for any day, a rate per annum equal to the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate in effect on such day, (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate in effect on such day plus ½ of 1% and (c) the LIBO Rate for a one month Interest Period plus 1%; each change in the Alternate Base Rate shall take effect simultaneously with the corresponding change or changes in the Prime Rate, the Federal Funds Effective Rate or the LIBO Rate (provided that clause (c) shall not be applicable to the extent Majority Lenders reasonably determine that circumstances described in Section 2.17(a) or (b) exist).
Alternate Base Rate Loans ” — Revolving Loans hereunder at all times when they bear interest at a rate based upon the Alternate Base Rate.
Anadarko ” — Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware corporation.
Anti-Corruption Laws ” —the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, the rules and regulations thereunder, and all other laws, rules, and regulations concerning or relating to bribery or corruption in effect in jurisdictions in which the Borrower and its Subsidiaries operate or conduct business.

2



Applicable Percentage ” — with respect to any Lender, the percentage of the total Commitments represented by such Lender’s Commitment. If the Commitments of all Lenders have terminated or expired, the Applicable Percentage shall be determined based upon such Lender’s percentage of outstanding Revolving Loans and LC Exposure.
Arrangers ” — Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Mizuho Bank, Ltd., PNC Capital Markets LLC, and U.S. Bank National Association, in their respective capacities as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners hereunder.
Assignment and Assumption ” — an assignment and assumption entered into by a Lender and an assignee (with the consent of any party whose consent is required by Section 10.04), and accepted by the Administrative Agent, in substantially the form of Exhibit B or any other form approved by the Administrative Agent.
Bail-In Action ” — the exercise of any Write-Down and Conversion Powers by the applicable EEA Resolution Authority in respect of any liability of an EEA Financial Institution.
Bail-In Legislation ” — with respect to any EEA Member Country implementing Article 55 of Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union, the implementing law for such EEA Member Country from time to time which is described in the EU Bail-In Legislation Schedule.
Base Rate Margin ” — a rate per annum determined in accordance with the Pricing Schedule.
Board ” — the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Board of Directors ” — with respect to a Person, the board of directors or other governing body of such Person.
Borrower ” — Western Gas Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, or permitted successor and assigns under Section 10.04.
Borrowing ” — (a) Loans of the same Type, made, converted or continued on the same date and, in the case of Eurodollar Loans, as to which a single Interest Period is in effect or (b) a Swingline Loan.
Borrowing Date ” — each Business Day specified in a notice pursuant to Section 2.03 as a date on which the Borrower requests (or is deemed to have requested) the Lenders to make Loans.
Borrowing Request ” — a request by the Borrower for a Borrowing in accordance with Section 2.03.
Business Day ” — any day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or other day on which commercial banks in New York City, New York are authorized or required by law to remain closed; provided

3



that when used in connection with a Eurodollar Loan, the term “Business Day” shall also exclude any day on which banks are not open for dealings in Dollar deposits in the London interbank market.
Capital Lease ” — as applied to any Person, any lease of any property (whether real, personal or mixed) by that Person as lessee that, in accordance with GAAP, is required to be accounted for as a capital lease on the balance sheet of that Person.
Change in Law ” — the occurrence, after the Effective Date, of any of the following: (a) the adoption or taking effect of any law, rule, regulation or treaty, (b) any change in any applicable law, rule, regulation or treaty or in the administration, interpretation, implementation or application thereof by any Governmental Authority or (c) the making or issuance of any request, rule, guideline or directive (whether or not having the force of law) by any Governmental Authority; provided that notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (x) the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and all requests, rules, guidelines or directives thereunder or issued in connection therewith and (y) all requests, rules, guidelines or directives promulgated by the Bank for International Settlements, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (or any successor or similar authority) or the United States or foreign regulatory authorities, in each case pursuant to Basel III, shall in each case be deemed to be a “Change in Law”, regardless of the date enacted, adopted, implemented or issued.
Change of Control ” — (a) Anadarko shall cease to, directly or indirectly, Control the General Partner, or (b) the General Partner shall cease to either be or Control the sole general partner of the Borrower.
CI Lender ” — as defined in the definition of “ Notice of Commitment Increase ”.
Code ” — the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.
Commission ” — the Securities and Exchange Commission, as from time to time constituted, created under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or, if at any time after the execution of this Agreement such Commission is not existing and performing the duties now assigned to it, then the body performing such duties at such time.
Commitment ” — with respect to each Lender, the commitment of such Lender to make Revolving Loans pursuant to Section 2.01 and to acquire participations in Letters of Credit and Swingline Loans pursuant to Section 2.05 and Section 2.22, respectively, in each case, during the Revolving Period, expressed as an amount representing the maximum aggregate amount of such Lender’s Credit Exposure hereunder, as such commitment may be modified from time to time pursuant to Section 2.06, Section 2.09, Section 8.01 or Section 10.04. The initial amount of each Lender’s Commitment is set forth on Annex I hereto, in the Assignment and Assumption pursuant to which such Lender shall have assumed its Commitment or in Annex I to the Notice of Commitment Increase, as applicable. The aggregate amount of the Commitments on the Effective Date is $1,500,000,000.
Commitment Increase ” — as defined in Section 2.09(a).

4



Commitment Increase Effective Date ” — as defined in Section 2.09(a)(iii).
Communications ” — as defined in Section 10.01(d).
Consenting Lenders ” — as defined in Section 2.24(b).
Consolidated EBITDA ” — for any period, an amount equal to Consolidated Net Income for such period plus (1) to the extent deducted in determining Consolidated Net Income for such period, the aggregate amount of (a) taxes based on or measured by income, (b) Consolidated Interest Expense, (c) depreciation and amortization expenses and (d) non-cash equity-based or similar non-cash incentive-based awards or arrangements, non-cash compensation expense or costs, including any such non-cash charges arising from stock options, restricted stock grants or other non-cash equity incentive grants and (2) net proceeds from sales and purchases of natural gas and natural gas liquids under fixed price agreements with Anadarko not otherwise treated as income under GAAP; provided that, at the Borrower’s option, and subject to the approval of the Administrative Agent (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed), Consolidated EBITDA shall be calculated by giving effect to Material Project EBITDA Adjustments.
Consolidated Indebtedness ” — at any time, the Indebtedness of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries, determined on a consolidated basis as of such time in accordance with GAAP.
Consolidated Interest Expense ” — for any period, the sum (determined without duplication) of the aggregate gross interest expense (excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, any interest income) of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for such period, including to the extent included in interest expense under GAAP: (a) amortization of debt discount and (b) capitalized interest.
Consolidated Leverage Ratio ” — as of the last day of each fiscal quarter of the Borrower, the ratio of (a) Consolidated Indebtedness on such day to (b) Consolidated EBITDA for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on such day.
Consolidated Net Income ” — for any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters, the net income of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for such period determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP; provided that: (A) Consolidated Net Income shall not include (i) extraordinary gains or extraordinary losses, (ii) net gains and losses in respect of disposition of assets other than in the ordinary course of business, (iii) gains or losses attributable to write-ups or write-downs of assets including unrealized gains or losses with respect to hedging and derivative activities, (iv) gains or losses attributable to any Joint Venture or Non-Wholly Owned Subsidiary, unless such gains are actually distributed to the Borrower or its Subsidiaries in cash and (v) the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principles, all as reported in the Borrower’s consolidated statement(s) of income for the relevant period(s) prepared in accordance with GAAP; and (B) if the Borrower or any Subsidiary shall acquire or dispose of any property during such period, then Consolidated Net Income shall be calculated after giving pro forma effect to such acquisition or disposition, as if such acquisition or disposition had occurred on the first day of such period.
Consolidated Net Tangible Assets ” — as of any date of determination, the total amount of assets of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries determined on a consolidated basis after deducting

5



therefrom the value (net of any applicable reserves) of all current liabilities (excluding (i) any current liabilities that by their terms are extendable or renewable at the option of the obligor thereon to a time more than 12 months after the time as of which the amount thereof is being computed, and (ii) current maturities of long-term debt), goodwill, trade names, trademarks, patents and other like intangible net assets, all as set forth, or on a pro forma basis would be set forth, on the consolidated balance sheet of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for the most recently completed fiscal quarter, in accordance with GAAP.
Control ” — the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of a Person, whether through the ability to exercise voting power, by contract, or otherwise. “ Controlling ” and “ Controlled ” have meanings correlative thereto.
Credit Exposure ” — LC Exposure, Revolving Credit Exposure, Swingline Exposure, or any thereof.
Debtor Relief Laws ” — the Bankruptcy Code of the United States of America, and all other liquidation, conservatorship, bankruptcy, assignment for the benefit of creditors, moratorium, rearrangement, receivership, insolvency, reorganization, or similar debtor relief laws of the United States or other applicable jurisdictions from time to time in effect.
Declining Lender ” — as defined in Section 2.24(d).
Default ” — an event which with the giving of notice or the passage of time, or both, would constitute an Event of Default.
Defaulting Lender ” — subject to Section 2.23(e), any Lender that (a)(i) has failed to fund any portion of its Loans or participations in Letters of Credit or Swingline Loans required to be funded by it hereunder within one Business Day of the date required to be funded by it hereunder, (ii) has otherwise failed to pay over to the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank, the Swingline Lender or any other Lender any other amount required to be paid by it hereunder (including in respect of its participation in Letters of Credit and Swingline Loans) within one Business Day of the date when due, (iii) has notified the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank, the Swingline Lender or any other Lender in writing that it does not intend to comply with any of its funding obligations under this Agreement or has made a public statement to the effect that it does not intend to comply or has failed to comply with its funding obligations under this Agreement, (iv) has failed, within three Business Days after written request by the Administrative Agent or the Borrower, to confirm in writing to the Administrative Agent and the Borrower that it will comply with its prospective funding obligations under this Agreement (provided that such Lender shall cease to be a Defaulting Lender pursuant to this clause (iv) upon receipt of such written confirmation by the Administrative Agent and the Borrower) or (v) has, or has a direct or indirect parent company that has, (A) become the subject of a proceeding under any Debtor Relief Law, (B) had appointed for it a receiver, custodian, conservator, trustee, administrator, assignee for the benefit of creditors or similar Person charged with reorganization or liquidation of its business or assets, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other state or federal regulatory authority acting in such a capacity, or (C) become the subject of a Bail-In Action; provided , that a Lender shall not be

6



a Defaulting Lender solely by virtue of the ownership or acquisition of any equity interest in such Lender or any direct or indirect parent company thereof by a Governmental Authority or instrumentality thereof so long as such ownership interest does not result in or provide such Lender with immunity from the jurisdiction of courts within the United States or from the enforcement of judgments or writs of attachment on its assets or permit such Lender (or such Governmental Authority) to reject, repudiate, disavow or disaffirm any contracts or agreements made with such Lender, or (b) assigns or transfers all or a part of its rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the Borrower, unless such assignment or transfer is made without the consent of the Borrower pursuant to Section 10.04(b)(i)(A). Any determination by the Administrative Agent that a Lender is a Defaulting Lender under any one or more of clauses (a) or (b) above shall be conclusive and binding absent manifest error, and such Lender shall be deemed to be a Defaulting Lender (subject to Section 2.23(e)) upon delivery of written notice of such determination to the Borrower and each Lender
Documentation Agent ” — as defined in the preamble hereof.
Domestic Lending Office ” — initially, the office of a Lender designated as such in its Administrative Questionnaire, and thereafter such other office of such Lender, if any, of which such Lender shall have most recently notified the Administrative Agent and the Borrower in writing.
EEA Financial Institution ” — (a) any credit institution or investment firm established in any EEA Member Country which is subject to the supervision of an EEA Resolution Authority, (b) any entity established in an EEA Member Country which is a parent of an institution described in clause (a) of this definition, or (c) any financial institution established in an EEA Member Country which is a subsidiary of an institution described in clauses (a) or (b) of this definition and is subject to consolidated supervision with its parent.
EEA Member Country ” — any of the member states of the European Union, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.
EEA Resolution Authority ” — any public administrative authority or any person entrusted with public administrative authority of any EEA Member Country (including any delegee) having responsibility for the resolution of any EEA Financial Institution.
Effective Date ” — as defined in the preamble.
Environmental Laws ” — to the extent relating to exposure to hazardous or toxic substances or materials, any applicable and legally enforceable requirement of any Governmental Authority pertaining to (a) the protection of human health, safety, and the indoor or outdoor environment, (b) the conservation, management, or use of natural resources and wildlife, (c) the protection or use of surface water and groundwater, (d) the management, manufacture, possession, presence, use, generation, transportation, treatment, storage, disposal, release, threatened release, abatement, removal, remediation or handling of, or exposure to, any hazardous or toxic substance or material or (e) pollution (including any release to land surface water and groundwater) and includes, without limitation, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986,

7



42 USC 9601 et seq., Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendment of 1984, 42 USC 6901 et seq., Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended by the Clean Water Act of 1977, 33 USC 1251 et seq., Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 USC 7401 et seq., Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976, 15 USC 2601 et seq., Hazardous Materials Transportation Law, 49 USC App. 1501 et seq., Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, as amended, 29 USC 651 et seq., Oil Pollution Act of 1990, 33 USC 2701 et seq., Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act of 1986, 42 USC 11001 et seq., National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 USC 4321 et seq., Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, 42 USC 300(f) et seq., any analogous implementing or successor law, and any amendment, rule, regulation, order, or directive issued thereunder.
Equity Interests ” — shares of capital stock, partnership interests, membership interests in a limited liability company, beneficial interests in a trust or other equity ownership interests in a Person, and any warrants, options or other rights entitling the holder thereof to purchase or acquire any such Equity Interest.
ERISA ” — the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time.
ERISA Affiliate ” — any trade or business (whether or not incorporated) that, together with the Borrower, is treated as a single employer under Section 414(b) or (c) of the Code or, solely for purposes of Section 302 of ERISA and Section 412 of the Code, is treated as a single employer under Section 414 of the Code.
ERISA Event ” — (a) any “reportable event,” as defined in Section 4043 of ERISA or the regulations issued thereunder with respect to a Plan subject to Title IV of ERISA (other than an event for which the 30-day notice period is waived), (b) the withdrawal of the Borrower, a Subsidiary or any ERISA Affiliate from a Plan subject to Title IV of ERISA during a plan year in which it was a “substantial employer” as defined in Section 4001(a)(2) of ERISA, (c) the failure of a Plan to meet the minimum funding standards under Section 412 of the Code or Section 302 of ERISA (determined without regard to Section 412(c) of the Code or Section 302(c) of ERISA), (d) the incurrence by the Borrower, any Subsidiary or any of ERISA Affiliate of any liability under Title IV of ERISA with respect to the termination of any Plan, (e) the receipt by the Borrower, a Subsidiary or any ERISA Affiliate from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation or a plan administrator of any notice relating to an intention to terminate any Plan or Plans subject to Title IV of ERISA or to appoint a trustee to administer any Plan subject to Title IV of ERISA, (f) the incurrence by the Borrower, a Subsidiary or any ERISA Affiliate of any liability with respect to the withdrawal or partial withdrawal from any Plan subject to Title IV of ERISA or Multiemployer Plan, (g) the failure of a Plan subject to Title IV of ERISA to satisfy the requirements of Section 401(a)(29) of the Code, Section 436 of the Code or Section 206(g) of ERISA, or (h) the receipt by the Borrower, a Subsidiary or any ERISA Affiliate of any notice, or the receipt by any Multiemployer Plan from the Borrower, a Subsidiary or any ERISA Affiliate of any notice, concerning the imposition of withdrawal liability under Section 4202 of ERISA, or a determination that a Multiemployer Plan is, or is expected to be, “insolvent,” in “reorganization,” in “endangered status,” or in “critical status” (within the meaning assigned to such terms under ERISA).

8



EU Bail-In Legislation Schedule ” — the EU Bail-In Legislation Schedule published by the Loan Market Association (or any successor thereto), as in effect from time to time.
Eurodollar Lending Office ” — initially, the office of a Lender designated as such in its Administrative Questionnaire, and thereafter such other office of such Lender, if any, of which such Lender shall have most recently notified the Administrative Agent and the Borrower in writing.
Eurodollar Loan ” — a Loan denominated in Dollars that bears interest at a rate based upon the LIBO Rate.
Eurodollar Margin ” — a rate per annum determined in accordance with the Pricing Schedule.
Event of Default ” — as defined in Section 8.01.
Excluded Taxes ” — any of the following Taxes imposed on or with respect to or required to be withheld from a payment to the Administrative Agent, any Lender, any Issuing Bank or any other recipient of any payment to be made by or on account of any obligation of the Borrower under any Loan Document, (a) Taxes imposed on or measured by net income (however denominated), franchise Taxes, and branch profits Taxes, in each case, (i) imposed as a result of such recipient being organized under the laws of, or having its principal office or, in the case of any Lender, its applicable lending office located in, the jurisdiction imposing such Tax (or any political subdivision thereof) or (ii) that are Other Connection Taxes, (b) in the case of a Lender, U.S. federal withholding Taxes imposed on amounts payable to or for the account of such Lender with respect to an applicable interest in a Loan or Commitment pursuant to a law in effect on the date on which (i) such Lender acquires such interest in the Loan or Commitment or (ii) such Lender changes its lending office, except in each case to the extent that, pursuant to Section 2.16, amounts with respect to such Taxes were payable either to such Lender’s assignor immediately before such Lender became a party hereto or to such Lender immediately before it changed its lending office, (c) Taxes attributable to such recipient’s failure to comply with Section 2.16(e) and (d) any U.S. federal withholding Taxes imposed under FATCA.
Existing Letters of Credit ” — as defined in Section 10.16.
Existing Lenders ” — as defined in Section 10.16.
Existing Revolving Credit Agreement ” — the Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2014, among the Borrower, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and the lenders parties thereto, as amended by the First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of October 20, 2015, and the Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of December 16, 2016.
Extension Effective Date ” — as defined in Section 2.24(b).
Extension of Credit ” — the making of any Loan or the issuance of any Letter of Credit.

9



Facility Fee ” — as defined in Section 2.04(a).
Facility Fee Rate ” — a rate per annum determined daily in accordance with the Pricing Schedule.
FATCA ” — Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Code, as of the date of this Agreement (or any amended or successor version that is substantively comparable and not materially more onerous to comply with), any current or future regulations or official interpretations thereof, any agreement entered into pursuant to Section 1471(b)(1) of the Code, and any intergovernmental agreement entered into in connection with the implementation of such Sections of the Code.
Federal Funds Effective Rate ” — for any day, the weighted average (rounded upwards, if necessary, to the next 1/100 of 1%) of the rates on overnight US Federal funds transactions with members of the US Federal Reserve System, as published on the next succeeding Business Day by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or, if such rate is not so published for any day that is a Business Day, the average (rounded upwards, if necessary, to the next 1/100 of 1%) of the quotations for such day for such transactions received by the Administrative Agent from three Federal funds brokers of recognized standing selected by it.
Financial Officer ” — the chief financial officer, principal accounting officer, treasurer or controller of the Borrower or any other officer or employee that any of the foregoing may, in accordance with the Borrower’s customary business practices, designate to act as a Financial Officer by notice to the Administrative Agent in accordance with this Agreement.
Fitch ” — Fitch, Inc., and any successor thereto that is a nationally recognized rating agency.
Foreign Lender ” — any Lender that is not a U.S. Person.
Fronting Exposure ” — at any time there is a Defaulting Lender, (a) with respect to the Issuing Banks, such Defaulting Lender’s Applicable Percentage of the outstanding LC Exposure other than LC Exposure as to which such Defaulting Lender’s participation obligation has been reallocated to other Lenders or secured by cash collateral in accordance with the terms hereof, and (b) with respect to the Swingline Lender, such Defaulting Lender’s Applicable Percentage of the outstanding Swingline Exposure other than Swingline Exposure as to which such Defaulting Lender’s participation obligation has been reallocated to other Lenders.
GAAP ” — generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, as in effect from time to time.
General Partner ” — Western Gas Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, in its capacity as the general partner of the Borrower, or any entity that succeeds it as the general partner of the Borrower.
Governmental Authority ” — the government of the United States or any other nation, or of any political subdivision thereof, whether state or local, and any agency, authority, instrumentality, regulatory body, court, central bank or other entity exercising executive, legislative, judicial, taxing,

10



regulatory or administrative powers or functions of or pertaining to government (including any supra-national bodies such as the European Union or the European Central Bank).
Indebtedness ” — any indebtedness which (a) is for money borrowed, (b) represents the deferred purchase price of property or assets purchased, except trade accounts payable in the ordinary course of business, (c) is in respect of a capitalized lease or (d) is in respect of a guarantee of any of the foregoing obligations of another Person.
Indemnified Taxes ” — (a) Taxes, other than Excluded Taxes, imposed on or with respect to any payment made by or on account of any obligation of the Borrower under any Loan Document and (b) to the extent not otherwise described in (a), Other Taxes.
Indemnitee ” — as defined in Section 10.03(b).
Information ” — as defined in Section 10.12.
Information Memorandum ” — the Executive Summary dated January 2018 relating to the Borrower and the Transactions.
Interest Election Request ” — as defined in Section 2.10(c).
Interest Payment Date ” — (a) as to any Alternate Base Rate Loan (other than the Swingline Loans and except as provided in Section 2.18), the end of any calendar quarter with respect thereto and, as to any Lender, the Maturity Date for such Lender, (b) as to any Eurodollar Loan (other than the Swingline Loans), the last day of the Interest Period with respect thereto, and, for Interest Periods longer than 3 months, each date which is 3 months, or a whole multiple thereof, from the first day of such Interest Period and (c) as to any Swingline Loan, the end of each calendar quarter.
Interest Period ” — with respect to any Eurodollar Loan, (i) initially, the period commencing on the Borrowing Date or continuation date, as the case may be, with respect to such Eurodollar Loan and ending 1 week or 1, 2, 3, 6 or, to the extent funds are available to all Lenders, 12 months thereafter, as selected by the Borrower in its Borrowing Request or Interest Election Request, as the case may be, given with respect thereto, and (ii) thereafter, each period commencing on the last day of the next preceding Interest Period applicable to such Eurodollar Loan and ending 1 week or 1, 2, 3, 6 or, to the extent funds are available, as determined by the Administrative Agent, 12 months thereafter, as selected by the Borrower by irrevocable notice to the Administrative Agent not less than two Business Days prior to the last day of the then current Interest Period with respect thereto; provided that (A) if any Interest Period would end on a day other than a Business Day, such Interest Period shall be extended to the next succeeding Business Day unless such next succeeding Business Day would fall in the next calendar month, in which case such Interest Period shall end on the next preceding Business Day, and (B) any Interest Period (other than a 1 week Interest Period) that commences on the last Business Day of a calendar month (or on a day for which there is no numerically corresponding day in the last calendar month of such Interest Period) shall end on the last Business Day of the last calendar month of such Interest Period.

11



Investment Grade Rating ” — the rating of senior unsecured non-credit enhanced publicly held debt of such Person, by at least two of the three rating agencies as follows: BBB- or better by S&P or Baa3 or better by Moody’s or BBB- or better by Fitch.
Issuing Banks ” — Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., Citibank, N.A., Mizuho Bank, Ltd., PNC Bank, National Association, U.S. Bank National Association, and any other consenting Lender reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent. Any Issuing Bank may, in its discretion, arrange for one or more Letters of Credit requested by the Borrower in accordance with this Agreement to be issued by Affiliates of such Issuing Bank, in which case the term “Issuing Bank” shall include any such Affiliate with respect to Letters of Credit issued by such Affiliate.
Joint Venture ” — any Person, other than an individual, the Borrower or a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Borrower, in which the Borrower or a Subsidiary of the Borrower holds or acquires no more than 50% of such Person’s Equity Interests (whether by way of capital stock, partnership or limited liability company interest, or other evidence of ownership) excluding warrants, options or unexercised rights to acquire or purchase an Equity Interest.
LC Disbursement ” — a payment made by an Issuing Bank pursuant to a Letter of Credit issued by such Issuing Bank.
LC Exposure ” — at any time, the sum of (a) the aggregate undrawn amount of all outstanding Letters of Credit issued for the account of the Borrower at such time, plus (b) the aggregate amount of all LC Disbursements that the Borrower is obligated to reimburse but which have not yet been reimbursed by or on behalf of the Borrower at such time. The LC Exposure of any Lender at any time shall be equal to its Applicable Percentage of the total LC Exposure at such time.
LC Fees ” — as defined in Section 2.04(b).
LC Issuance Limit ” — for the Issuing Banks, a maximum aggregate amount of $100,000,000.
Lender ” and “ Lenders ” — as defined in the preamble hereof. Unless the context otherwise requires, the term “Lender” includes the Swingline Lender.
Letter of Credit ” — any stand-by letter of credit issued (or, in respect of the Existing Letters of Credit, deemed issued) on or after the Effective Date pursuant to this Agreement.
LIBO Rate ” — subject to the implementation of a Replacement Rate in accordance with Section 2.25,
(a)    for any interest rate calculation with respect to a Eurodollar Loan, the rate of interest per annum determined by reference to the rate for deposits in Dollars for a period equal to the applicable Interest Period published by the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited, a United Kingdom company, or a comparable or successor quoting service approved by the Administrative

12



Agent, at approximately 11:00 a.m. (London time) two Business Days prior to the first day of the applicable Interest Period. If, for any reason, such rate is not so published then the “ LIBO Rate ” shall be determined by the Administrative Agent to be the arithmetic average of the rate per annum at which deposits in Dollars would be offered by first class banks in the London interbank market to the Administrative Agent at approximately 11:00 a.m. (London time) two Business Days prior to the first day of the applicable Interest Period for a period equal to such Interest Period, and
(b)    for any interest rate calculation with respect to an Alternate Base Rate Loan, the rate of interest per annum determined by reference to the rate for deposits in Dollars for an Interest Period equal to one month (commencing on the date of determination of such interest rate) as published by the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited, a United Kingdom company, or a comparable or successor quoting service approved by the Administrative Agent, at approximately 11:00 a.m. (London time) on such date of determination, or if such date is not a Business Day, then the immediately preceding Business Day. If, for any reason, such rate is not so published then the “ LIBO Rate ” for such Alternate Base Rate Loan shall be determined by the Administrative Agent to be the arithmetic average of the rate per annum at which deposits in Dollars would be offered by first class banks in the London interbank market to the Administrative Agent at approximately 11:00 a.m. (London time) on such date of determination for a period equal to one month commencing on such date of determination.
Each calculation by the Administrative Agent of the LIBO Rate shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes, absent manifest error. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (x) in no event shall the LIBO Rate be less than zero percent (0%), and (y) unless otherwise specified in any amendment to this Agreement entered into in accordance with Section 2.25, in the event that a Replacement Rate with respect to the LIBO Rate is implemented then all references herein to “ LIBO Rate ” shall be deemed references to such Replacement Rate.
Lien ” — with respect to any asset, any mortgage, pledge, hypothecation, assignment, deposit arrangement, security interest, encumbrance, lien (statutory or otherwise), preference, priority or charge of any kind (including any conditional sale or other title retention agreement, any financing or similar statement or notice filed under the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted and in effect in the relevant jurisdiction or other similar recording or notice statute, and any lease in the nature thereof) in respect of such asset to secure (or perfect) or provide for payment of any obligation.
Loan ” — the Revolving Loans made by the Lenders to the Borrower pursuant to this Agreement. Unless the context otherwise requires, the term “Loan” includes a Swingline Loan.
Loan Document(s) ” — this Agreement, any Notes and each and every other agreement executed by the Borrower in connection with this Agreement.
Majority Lenders ” — at any time, Lenders holding more than 50.0% of the then aggregate outstanding amount of the Revolving Loans, LC Exposure and Swingline Exposure held by the Lenders or, if no such principal amount, LC Exposure or Swingline Exposure is then outstanding, the Lenders having more than 50.0% of the Commitments; provided that the Credit Exposures and unused Commitments held or deemed held by, any Defaulting Lender shall be excluded for the purposes of making a determination of Majority Lenders.

13



Margin Regulations ” — Regulations T, U and X of the Board.
Material Adverse Change ” — any change occurring since December 31, 2016 in the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole that has had or could reasonably be expected to have the effect of preventing the Borrower from carrying on its business or from meeting its current and anticipated material obligations on a timely basis.
Material Project ” — any capital construction or expansion project of the Borrower or its Subsidiaries that has an aggregate capital cost or budgeted capital cost to Borrower or its Subsidiaries in excess of $20,000,000.
Material Project EBITDA Adjustments ” — with respect to each Material Project, (A) prior to completion of the Material Project, a percentage (equal to the then-current completion percentage of the Material Project) of an amount to be determined by the Borrower as the projected Consolidated EBITDA attributable to such Material Project (such amount to be determined by the Borrower in good faith and in a commercially reasonable manner based on customer contracts relating to such Material Project, the creditworthiness of the other parties to such contracts and projected revenues from such contracts, capital costs and expenses, scheduled completion, and other factors mutually agreed upon by the Borrower and the Administrative Agent) which shall be added, at the Borrowers’ option, to actual Consolidated EBITDA for the fiscal quarter in which construction of such Material Project commences and for each fiscal quarter thereafter until completion of the Material Project (net of any actual Consolidated EBITDA attributable to such Material Project following its completion), provided that if construction of the Material Project is not completed by the scheduled completion date, then the foregoing amount shall be reduced by the following percentage amounts depending on the period of delay for completion (based on the period of actual delay or then-estimated delay, whichever is longer): (i) longer than 90 days, but not more than 180 days, 25%, (ii) longer than 180 days but not more than 270 days, 50%, and (iii) longer than 270 days, 100%; and (B) beginning with the first full fiscal quarter following completion of the Material Project and for the two immediately succeeding fiscal quarters, an amount equal to the projected Consolidated EBITDA attributable to the Material Project for the balance of the four full fiscal quarter period following completion shall be added to the actual Consolidated EBITDA attributable to the Material Project for such fiscal quarter or quarters for determining Consolidated EBITDA for the fiscal quarter then ending and the immediately preceding three fiscal quarters.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any compliance certificate sent by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent in determining compliance with the financial covenants set forth in ARTICLE V hereof: (i) all Material Project EBITDA Adjustments to Consolidated EBITDA will not be deemed accepted unless the Borrower shall have delivered to the Administrative Agent, and the Administrative Agent shall have approved (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld), written pro forma projections of Consolidated EBITDA attributable to such Material Project (together with a reasonably detailed explanation of the basis therefor) and such other information and documentation as the Administrative Agent may reasonably request, all in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent, and (ii) the aggregate amount of all Material Project EBITDA Adjustments during any period shall be limited to 15% of the total actual

14



Consolidated EBITDA for such period (which total actual Consolidated EBITDA shall be determined without including any Material Project EBITDA Adjustments or any adjustments in respect of any acquisitions as provided in the definition of Consolidated EBITDA).
Material Subsidiary ” — any Subsidiary which as of any relevant date either (i) represents more than five percent (5%) of the Consolidated Net Income of the Borrower for the preceding period of four (4) consecutive fiscal quarters for which financial statements are then available or (ii) if such Subsidiary were formed or acquired during such period, would have represented more than five percent (5%) of Consolidated Net Income assuming that Consolidated Net Income were calculated after giving pro forma effect to such acquisition or formation, as if it had occurred on the first day of such period.
Maturity Date ” — with respect to any Lender, the later of (a) February 15, 2023 and (b) if such Lender is a Consenting Lender with respect to a Maturity Date extension pursuant to Section 2.24, such extended Maturity Date.
Moody’s ” — Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., and any successor thereto that is a nationally recognized rating agency.
Multiemployer Plan ” — a multiemployer Plan as defined in section 3(37) or 4001 (a)(3) of ERISA that is subject to Title IV of ERISA and to which the Borrower, a Subsidiary or an ERISA Affiliate is making, or accruing an obligation to make, contributions.
New Funds Amount ” —the amount equal to the product of a CI Lender’s Commitment represented as a percentage of the aggregate total Commitments after giving effect to the Commitment Increase times the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Revolving Loans immediately prior to giving effect to the Commitment Increase, if any, as of a Commitment Increase Effective Date (without regard to any increase in the aggregate principal amount of Revolving Loans as a result of any Revolving Borrowings made after giving effect to the Commitment Increase on such Commitment Increase Effective Date).
Non-Wholly Owned Subsidiary ” — any Subsidiary other than a Wholly Owned Subsidiary.
Note ” — any promissory note of the Borrower payable to a Lender in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A .
Notice of Commitment Increase ” — a notice in the form of Exhibit C specifying (i) the proposed Commitment Increase Effective Date for any Commitment Increase, (ii) the amount of the requested Commitment Increase, (iii) the amount of such Commitment Increase agreed to by each then existing Lender and evidence of such agreement reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent, such Lender and the Borrower, (iv) the identity of each financial institution not already a Lender (which such financial institution shall be reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent), which has agreed with the Borrower to become a Lender to effect such Commitment Increase, accompanied by evidence reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent, such CI Lender and the Borrower of such CI Lender’s agreement thereto and its joinder to

15



this Agreement and (v) the amount of the respective Commitments of the then existing Lenders and any such CI Lenders from and after the Commitment Increase Effective Date. Each such existing Lender or new Lender referenced in (iii) or (iv) being a “CI Lender”.
OFAC ” — The Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Other Connection Taxes ” — with respect to the Administrative Agent, any Lender or any Issuing Bank, Taxes imposed as a result of a present or former connection between such recipient and the jurisdiction imposing such Tax (other than connections arising from such recipient having executed, delivered, become a party to, performed its obligations under, received payments under, received or perfected a security interest under, engaged in any other transaction pursuant to or enforced any Loan Document, or sold or assigned an interest in any Loan or Loan Document).
Other Taxes ” — any and all present or future stamp or documentary, intangible, recording, filing or similar taxes, charges or levies arising from any payment made hereunder or from the execution, delivery, performance, registration or enforcement of, or from the receipt or perfection of a security interest under, or otherwise with respect to, this Agreement, except for any such Taxes that are Other Connection Taxes imposed with respect to an assignment (other than an assignment made pursuant to Section 10.13).
Participant ” — as defined in Section 10.04(c).
Participant Register ” — as defined in Section 10.04(c).
Permitted Acquisition ” — an Acquisition by the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, so long as (i) no Default or Event of Default is in existence or would be created thereby and (ii) (x) a substantial part of the assets of the Person (including any Joint Venture) or (y) the assets being acquired by the Borrower or such Subsidiaries are in each case commonly understood to be in or related to the midstream energy business, or any merger or amalgamation of the Borrower permitted under Section 6.08.
Person ” — any individual, corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture, association, joint-stock company, trust, unincorporated organization or Governmental Authority or other business entity.
Plan ” — any employee pension benefit plan, as defined in section 3(2) of ERISA but excluding any Multiemployer Plan, which (a) is currently or hereafter sponsored, maintained or contributed to by the Borrower, a Subsidiary or an ERISA Affiliate or (b) was at any time during the six calendar years preceding the date hereof, sponsored, maintained or contributed to by the Borrower, a Subsidiary or an ERISA Affiliate.
Platform ” — as defined in Section 10.01(d).
Post-Default Rate ” — as defined in Section 2.10(a).
Pricing Schedule ” — the schedule attached hereto as Schedule I and identified as such.

16



Prime Rate ” — the rate of interest per annum publicly announced from time to time by the Administrative Agent as its prime rate in effect at its principal U.S. office; each change in the Prime Rate shall be effective from and including the date such change is publicly announced as being effective. Such rate is set by the Administrative Agent as a general reference rate of interest, taking into account such factors as the Administrative Agent may deem appropriate; it being understood that many of the Administrative Agent’s commercial or other loans are not priced in relation to such rate, that it is not necessarily the lowest or best rate actually charged to any customer and that the Administrative Agent may make various commercial or other loans at rates of interest having no relationship to such rate.
Principal Amount ” — the outstanding principal amount of any Loan.
Reducing Percentage Lender ” — each then existing Lender immediately prior to giving effect to a Commitment Increase, which Lender shall not increase its respective Commitment in connection with such Commitment Increase (with the result that the relative percentage of the aggregate total Commitments of such Lender shall be reduced after giving effect to such Commitment Increase).
Reduction Amount ” — the amount by which a Reducing Percentage Lender’s outstanding Revolving Loans decrease as a result of a Commitment Increase on any Commitment Increase Effective Date (without regard to the effect of any Revolving Borrowings made on such Commitment Increase Effective Date after giving effect to the Commitment Increase).
Register ” — as defined in Section 10.04(b)(iv).
Related Parties ” — with respect to any specified Person, such Person’s Affiliates and the respective directors, officers, employees, advisors and agents of such Person and such Person’s Affiliates.
Replacement Rate ” — as defined in Section 2.25.
Resignation Effective Date ” — as defined in Section 9.09(a).
Restricted Payment ” — any dividend or other distribution (whether in cash, securities or other property) with respect to any Equity Interests in the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, or any payment (whether in cash, securities or other property), including any sinking fund or similar deposit, on account of the purchase, redemption, retirement, acquisition, cancellation or termination of any such Equity Interests in the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or any option, warrant or other right to acquire any such Equity Interests in the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries.
Revolving Commitment Termination Date ” — the earliest of:
(a)    the Maturity Date;
(b)    the date on which the Commitments are terminated in full or reduced to zero pursuant to Section 2.06; or

17



(c)    the date on which the Commitments otherwise are terminated in full and reduced to zero pursuant to ARTICLE VIII.
Revolving Credit Exposure ” — at any time, the aggregate outstanding principal amount of Revolving Loans made by the Lenders at such time. The Revolving Credit Exposure of any Lender at any time shall be equal to the outstanding principal amount of Revolving Loans made by such Lender at such time.
Revolving Loan ” — any Loan made by the Lenders pursuant to Section 2.01(a) of this Agreement.
Revolving Period ” — the period from and including the Effective Date to but excluding the Revolving Commitment Termination Date.
S&P ” — Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC, a subsidiary of S&P Global Inc., and any successor thereto that is a nationally recognized rating agency.
Sanctioned Country ” means at any time, a region, country or territory which is itself the subject or target of any Sanctions (including, as of the Effective Date, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Syria and Crimea).
Sanctioned Person ” — at any time, (a) any Person listed in any Sanctions-related list of designated Persons maintained by OFAC (including, without limitation, OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and OFAC’s Consolidated Non-SDN List), the U.S. Department of State, the United Nations Security Council, the European Union, Her Majesty’s Treasury of the United Kingdom or any EU member state in which the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries operates or conducts business, (b) any Person operating, organized or resident in a Sanctioned Country or (c) any Person controlled (to the knowledge of the Borrower) by any such Person or Persons described in clauses (a) and (b).
Sanctions ” — economic or financial sanctions or trade embargoes imposed, administered or enforced from time to time by (a) the U.S. government, including those administered by OFAC or the U.S. Department of State, or (b) the United Nations Security Council, the European Union or Her Majesty’s Treasury of the United Kingdom.
Subsidiary ” — with respect to any Person (the “parent”) at any date, any corporation, limited liability company, partnership, association or other entity the accounts of which would be consolidated with those of the parent in the parent’s consolidated financial statements if such financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP as of such date, as well as any other corporation, limited liability company, partnership, association or other entity (a) of which securities or other ownership interests representing more than 50% of the equity or more than 50% of the ordinary voting power or, in the case of a partnership, more than 50% of the general partnership interests are, as of such date, owned, controlled or held, or (b) that is, as of such date, otherwise Controlled, by the parent or one or more subsidiaries of the parent or by the parent and one or more subsidiaries of the parent. Unless the context otherwise clearly requires, reference in this Agreement to a “Subsidiary” or the “Subsidiaries” refers to a Subsidiary or the Subsidiaries of the Borrower.

18



Swingline Exposure ” — at any time, the aggregate principal amount of all Swingline Loans outstanding at such time. The Swingline Exposure of any Lender at any time shall be its Applicable Percentage of the total Swingline Exposure at such time.
Swingline Lender ” — Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, in its capacity as lender of Swingline Loans hereunder.
Swingline Loan ” — a Loan made pursuant to Section 2.22.
Syndication Agent ” — as defined in the preamble hereof.
Taxes ” — any and all present or future taxes, levies, imposts, duties, deductions, charges or withholdings (including backup withholding) and interest or penalties in respect thereof imposed by any Governmental Authority.
Transactions ” — the execution, delivery, and performance by the Borrower of this Agreement and the other Loan Documents, the borrowing of the Loans, the use of the proceeds thereof, and the issuance of Letters of Credit hereunder.
Type ” — as to any Loan or Borrowing, its nature as an Alternate Base Rate Loan or an Alternate Base Rate Borrowing, a Eurodollar Loan or a Eurodollar Borrowing.
US ” or “ United States ” — the United States of America, its fifty states, and the District of Columbia.
US Dollars ” or “ $ ” or “ Dollars ” — lawful money of the United States of America.
USA Patriot Act ” — as defined in Section 10.14.
U.S. Person ” — any Person that is a “United States Person” as defined in Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code.
U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate ”— as defined in Section 2.16(e)(ii)(B)(iii).
Wholly Owned Subsidiary ” — any Subsidiary of which all of the outstanding Equity Interests (other than any directors’ qualifying shares mandated by applicable law), on a fully-diluted basis, are owned by the Borrower or one or more of the Wholly Owned Subsidiaries or are owned by the Borrower and one or more of the Wholly Owned Subsidiaries.
Withholding Agent ”— the Borrower and the Administrative Agent.
Write-Down and Conversion Powers ” — with respect to any EEA Resolution Authority, the write-down and conversion powers of such EEA Resolution Authority from time to time under the Bail-In Legislation for the applicable EEA Member Country, which write-down and conversion powers are described in the EU Bail-In Legislation Schedule.

19



Section 1.02      Use of Defined Terms . Any defined term used in the plural preceded by the definite article shall be taken to encompass all members of the relevant class. Any defined term used in the singular preceded by “any” shall be taken to indicate any number of the members of the relevant class. Any definition or reference to any law, including, without limitation, Anti-Corruption Laws, the Bankruptcy Code, the Code, ERISA, the USA Patriot Act or the Investment Company Act of 1940, shall, unless otherwise specified, refer to such law as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time.
Section 1.03      Accounting Terms . All accounting terms not specifically defined herein shall be construed in each case in accordance with GAAP as in effect from time to time; provided that unless the Borrower and the Majority Lenders shall otherwise agree in writing, no such change shall modify or affect the manner in which compliance with the covenants contained herein is computed such that all such computations shall be conducted utilizing financial information presented consistently with prior periods.
Section 1.04      Interpretation The word “including” (and with correlative meaning “include”) means including, without limitation, the generality of any description preceding such term.
Section 1.05      Rates The Administrative Agent does not warrant or accept responsibility for, and shall not have any liability with respect to, the administration, submission or any other matter related to the rates in the definition of “LIBO Rate” or with respect to any comparable or successor rate thereto.
ARTICLE II
AMOUNT AND TERMS OF LOANS
Section 2.01      Loans .
(a)      Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, from time to time during the Revolving Period, each Lender severally agrees to make Revolving Loans in US Dollars to the Borrower in an aggregate principal amount that will not result in (i) such Lender’s Credit Exposure exceeding such Lender’s Commitment or (ii) the sum of the total Credit Exposures of all Lenders exceeding the total Commitments. Within the foregoing limits, the Borrower may use the Commitments by borrowing, repaying and prepaying the Revolving Loans in whole or in part, and reborrowing, all in accordance with the terms and conditions hereof.
(b)      Each Loan shall be made only during the Revolving Period as part of a Borrowing consisting of Revolving Loans made by the Lenders ratably in accordance with their Commitments. The failure of any Lender to make any Loan required to be made by it shall not relieve any other Lender of its obligations hereunder, provided that the Commitments of the Lenders are several and no Lender shall be responsible for any other Lender’s failure to make Loans as required.
(c)      Subject to Section 2.17, the Loans may be (i) Eurodollar Loans, (ii) Alternate Base Rate Loans or (iii) a combination thereof, as determined by the Borrower. Eurodollar Loans

20



shall be made and maintained by each Lender at either its Eurodollar Lending Office or its Domestic Lending Office, at its option, provided that the exercise of such option shall not affect the obligation of the Borrower to repay such Loan in accordance with the terms of this Agreement or create or increase any obligation of the Borrower not otherwise arising, or arising in such increased amount, under Section 2.14.
Section 2.02      Repayment of Loans; Evidence of Debt .
(a)      The Borrower hereby unconditionally promises to pay (i) to the Administrative Agent for the account of each Lender the then unpaid principal and accrued interest amount of each Revolving Loan of such Lender on the Maturity Date in respect of such Lender, and (ii) to the Swingline Lender the then unpaid principal amount of each Swingline Loan on the earlier of the Maturity Date and the first date after such Swingline Loan is made that is the 15th or last day of a calendar month and is at least two Business Days after such Swingline Loan is made; provided that on each date that a Revolving Loan is made, the Borrower shall repay all Swingline Loans then outstanding; provided further , that all Loans shall be paid on such earlier date upon which the maturity of the Loans shall have been accelerated pursuant to ARTICLE VIII.
(b)      Each Lender shall maintain in accordance with its usual practice an account or accounts evidencing the indebtedness of the Borrower to such Lender resulting from each Loan made by such Lender, including the amounts of principal and interest payable and paid to such Lender from time to time hereunder.
(c)      The Administrative Agent shall maintain accounts in which it shall record (i) the amount of each Loan made hereunder, the Type thereof and the Interest Period applicable thereto, (ii) the amount of any principal or interest due and payable or to become due and payable from the Borrower to each Lender hereunder, and (iii) the amount of any sum received by the Administrative Agent hereunder for the account of the Lenders and each Lender’s share thereof.
(d)      The entries made in the accounts maintained pursuant to paragraphs (b) and (c) of this Section 2.02 shall be prima facie evidence of the existence and amounts of the obligations recorded therein; provided that the failure of any Lender or the Administrative Agent to maintain such accounts or any error therein shall not in any manner affect the obligation of the Borrower to repay the Loans in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
(e)      Any Lender may request that Loans made by it to the Borrower be evidenced by a promissory note. In such event, the Borrower shall prepare, execute and deliver to such Lender a promissory note payable to such Lender in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A . Thereafter, the Loans evidenced by such Note and interest thereon shall, at all times (including after assignment pursuant to Section 10.04), be represented by one or more Notes in such form payable to the payee named therein or its registered assigns.
(f)      Each Lender is authorized to and shall record the date, Type and amount of each Loan made by such Lender, each continuation thereof, each conversion of all or a portion thereof to the same or another Type, and the date and amount of each payment of principal with respect thereto on the schedule annexed to and constituting a part of its Note from the Borrower.

21



No failure to make or error in making any such recording as authorized hereby shall affect the validity of the obligations of the Borrower to repay the Principal Amount of the Loans made to the Borrower with interest thereon as provided in Section 2.10 or the validity of any payment thereof made by the Borrower. Each Lender shall, at the request of the Borrower, deliver to the Borrower copies of the Borrower’s Note and the schedules annexed thereto.
Section 2.03      Procedure for Borrowing . The Borrower may borrow Loans on any Business Day; provided that the Borrower shall notify the Administrative Agent by telephone of the Borrowing (the “ Borrowing Request ”) not later than 1:00 p.m., New York City time (a) three (3) Business Days prior to the Borrowing Date, in the case of Eurodollar Loans, and (b) on the Borrowing Date, in the case of Alternate Base Rate Loans. Each telephonic Borrowing Request shall be irrevocable and shall be confirmed promptly by hand delivery or facsimile to the Administrative Agent of a written Borrowing Request in a form approved by the Administrative Agent and signed by the Borrower. Each such telephonic and written Borrowing Request shall specify (i) the amount to be borrowed, (ii) the Borrowing Date, (iii) whether the Borrowing is to consist of Eurodollar Loans, Alternate Base Rate Loans, or a combination thereof (in each case stating the amounts and currency requested), (iv) in the case of Eurodollar Loans, the length of the Interest Period(s) therefor, and (v) the location and number of the Borrower’s account to which funds are to be disbursed, which shall comply with the requirements of Section 2.12. Each Borrowing shall be in an aggregate principal amount not less than the lesser of (i) $10,000,000 or a whole multiple of $5,000,000 in excess thereof, and (ii) the then unused Commitments available to the Borrower. Upon receipt of such notice, the Administrative Agent shall promptly notify each Lender thereof. Each Lender will make the amount of its pro rata share of each Borrowing available to the Administrative Agent for the account of the Borrower in accordance with Section 2.12. The proceeds of each such Borrowing of Revolving Loans will be made available to the Borrower by the Administrative Agent in accordance with Section 2.12.
Section 2.04      Facility Fees and LC Fees .
(a)      Subject to Section 2.04(c), the Borrower agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of each Lender (other than to the Defaulting Lenders, if any) a Facility Fee from the Effective Date to, but not including, the Maturity Date or such earlier date upon which the Commitments shall terminate or be reduced to zero as provided herein, computed at the Facility Fee Rate on the daily amount of the Commitment of such Lender (whether used or unused) (the “ Facility Fee ”); provided that, if such Lender continues to have any Credit Exposure after its Commitment terminates, then such Facility Fee shall continue to accrue on the daily amount of such Lender’s Credit Exposure from and including the date on which its Commitment terminates to, but not including, the date on which such Lender ceases to have any Credit Exposure.
(b)      Subject to Section 2.23(d), the Borrower agrees to pay (i) to the Administrative Agent for the account of each Lender (other than to the Defaulting Lenders, if any) a participation fee with respect to its participations in Letters of Credit, which shall accrue at the same rate as the Eurodollar Margin on the average daily amount of such Lender’s LC Exposure to the Borrower (excluding any portion thereof attributable to unreimbursed LC Disbursements) during the period from and including the Effective Date to but excluding the later of the date on which

22



such Lender’s Commitment terminates and the date on which such Lender ceases to have any LC Exposure, and (ii) to the Issuing Bank thereof for its own account an issuing or fronting fee, payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of each March, June, September and December, commencing March 31, 2018, for the account of the Borrower, which shall be the normal issuing fee for letters of credit issued by such Issuing Bank, not to be less than the greater of $500 or 0.150% times the face amount of such Letter of Credit (collectively, the “ LC Fees ”). In addition, the Borrower agrees to pay to the Issuing Bank thereof such Issuing Bank’s standard fees with respect to the amendment, renewal or extension of any Letter of Credit or processing of drawings thereunder.
(c)      Facility Fees and LC Fees payable to any Lender shall be payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of each March, June, September and December, commencing on March 31, 2018, and on the Maturity Date with respect to such Lender or, with respect to Facility Fees, on such earlier date as the Commitments shall terminate or be reduced to zero as provided herein. All accrued Facility Fees and LC Fees payable to any Lender which are not paid on or before the Maturity Date with respect to such Lender shall be due and payable on demand.
Section 2.05      Letters of Credit .
(a)      Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the Borrower may request the issuance of Letters of Credit for its own account or the account of any other Person, in a form reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent and the Issuing Bank issuing such Letter of Credit, at any time and from time to time prior to the Revolving Commitment Termination Date; provided that no Issuing Bank shall be obligated to issue any Letter of Credit (i) that would result in the aggregate undrawn or drawn and unreimbursed amount of Letters of Credit outstanding issued by all Issuing Banks to exceed the LC Issuance Limit, or (ii) at any time a Lender is a Defaulting Lender, unless, in the case of this clause (ii), (A) such Defaulting Lender’s Applicable Percentage of such Issuing Bank’s percentage of the LC Exposure has been reallocated to the other Lenders as provided in Section 2.23(c) and/or (B) such Issuing Bank has entered into arrangements, including the delivery of cash collateral, satisfactory to such Issuing Bank (in its sole and reasonable discretion) with the Borrower or such Lender to eliminate such Issuing Bank’s Fronting Exposure with respect to such Letter of Credit as provided in Section 2.05(k); provided further that no Issuing Bank shall be obligated to issue any Letter of Credit that would result in the aggregate undrawn or drawn and unreimbursed amount of Letters of Credit outstanding issued by such Issuing Bank exceeding the “Maximum LC Issuance Amount” for such Issuing Bank set forth opposite such Issuing Bank’s name on Annex II attached hereto (as may be amended from time to time by the Administrative Agent, the Borrower and each Issuing Bank affected thereby). In the event of (i) any inconsistency between the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the terms and conditions of any form of letter of credit application or other agreement submitted by the Borrower to, or entered into by the Borrower with, any Issuing Bank relating to any Letter of Credit, or (ii) any terms and conditions supplemental to the terms and conditions of this Agreement contained in any such form of letter of credit application or such other agreement, in each case, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall control and such supplemental terms and conditions shall be ignored. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no Issuing Bank shall have any obligation hereunder to issue, and shall not issue, any Letter of Credit the proceeds of which would be made to any Person (i) to fund any activity or business of or with any Sanctioned Person, or in any country or territory, that at the time

23



of such funding is the subject of any Sanctions or (ii) in any manner that would result in a violation of any Sanctions by any party to this Agreement.
(b)      To request the issuance of a Letter of Credit (or the amendment, renewal or extension of an outstanding Letter of Credit), the Borrower shall hand deliver or facsimile (or transmit by electronic communication, if arrangements for doing so have been approved by such Issuing Bank) to the appropriate Issuing Bank and the Administrative Agent (reasonably in advance of the requested date of issuance, amendment, renewal or extension) a notice requesting the issuance of a Letter of Credit, or identifying the Letter of Credit to be amended, renewed or extended, and specifying the date of issuance, amendment, renewal or extension (which shall be a Business Day), the date on which such Letter of Credit is to expire (which shall comply with Section 2.05(c)), the amount of such Letter of Credit, the name and address of the beneficiary thereof and such other information as shall be necessary to prepare, amend, renew or extend such Letter of Credit. If requested by an Issuing Bank, the Borrower also shall submit a letter of credit application on such Issuing Bank’s standard form in connection with any request for a Letter of Credit. A Letter of Credit shall be issued, amended, renewed or extended only if (and upon issuance, amendment, renewal or extension of each Letter of Credit, the Borrower shall be deemed to represent and warrant that), after giving effect to such issuance, amendment, renewal or extension and the continuation of the Existing Letters of Credit hereunder by the deemed issuance thereof hereunder (i) the LC Exposure shall not exceed the unused Commitments of all Lenders, (ii) the Credit Exposure shall not exceed the total Commitments, (iii) the requested Letter of Credit shall not result in the Issuing Banks having outstanding Letters of Credit in an aggregate undrawn or drawn and unreimbursed amount in excess of the LC Issuance Limit and (iv) the requested Letter of Credit shall not result in such Issuing Bank having outstanding Letters of Credit in excess of the “Maximum LC Issuance Amount” for such Issuing Bank set forth opposite such Issuing Bank’s name on Annex II attached hereto (as may be amended from time to time by the Administrative Agent, the Borrower and each Issuing Bank affected thereby); provided that no Issuing Bank shall issue, amend, renew or extend any Letter of Credit if such Issuing Bank shall have received written notice (which has not been rescinded) from the Administrative Agent or any Lender that any applicable condition precedent to the issuance, amendment, renewal or extension of such Letter of Credit has not been satisfied at the requested time of issuance, amendment, renewal or extension of such Letter of Credit.
(c)      Each Letter of Credit shall be denominated in US Dollars and shall expire at or prior to the close of business on the date selected by the Borrower, which shall not be later than the earlier of (i) the date one year after the date of the issuance of such Letter of Credit (or, in the case of any renewal or extension thereof, one year after such renewal or extension), and (ii) the date that is five (5) Business Days prior to the Maturity Date; provided that a Letter of Credit may, with the consent and at the sole discretion of the Issuing Bank thereof, expire after the Maturity Date if the Borrower provides to such Issuing Bank at any time on or prior to the date that is five (5) Business Days prior to the Maturity Date, an amount of cash collateral (to be held by such Issuing Bank in a non-interest bearing account) equal to (or at such Issuing Bank’s discretion in excess of) the LC Exposure in respect of such Letter of Credit as of such date plus any accrued and unpaid interest thereon; provided , further , that any Letter of Credit with a one-year tenor may, pursuant to terms acceptable to the Issuing Bank thereof upon the issuance thereof, provide for the automatic renewal thereof (without the approval of the Borrower) for additional one-year periods

24



(which, in no event, shall extend beyond the date referred to in clause (ii) of this paragraph (c) except in accordance with the foregoing proviso).
(d)      By the issuance of a Letter of Credit (or an amendment to a Letter of Credit increasing the amount thereof) and the continuation hereunder of the Existing Letters of Credit by the deemed issuance thereof hereunder and without any further action on the part of the Issuing Bank thereof or the Lenders, such Issuing Bank hereby grants to each Lender, and each such Lender hereby acquires from such Issuing Bank, a participation in such Letter of Credit equal to such Lender’s Applicable Percentage of the aggregate amount available to be drawn under such Letter of Credit. In consideration and in furtherance of the foregoing, each Lender hereby absolutely and unconditionally agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent, for the account of an Issuing Bank, such Lender’s Applicable Percentage of each LC Disbursement made by such Issuing Bank and not reimbursed by the Borrower on the date due as provided in Section 2.05(e), or of any reimbursement payment required to be refunded to the Borrower for any reason. Each Lender acknowledges and agrees that its obligation to acquire participations pursuant to this paragraph in respect of Letters of Credit is absolute and unconditional and shall not be affected by any circumstance whatsoever, including any amendment, renewal or extension of any Letter of Credit or the occurrence and continuance of an Event of Default or reduction or termination of the Commitments, and that each such payment shall be made without any offset, abatement, withholding or reduction whatsoever.
(e)      If an Issuing Bank shall make any LC Disbursement in respect of a Letter of Credit, the Borrower shall reimburse such LC Disbursement in US Dollars by paying to the Administrative Agent an amount equal to such LC Disbursement not later than 12:00 noon, New York City time, on (i) the Business Day that the Borrower receives a notice of such LC Disbursement from the Administrative Agent, if such notice is received prior to 10:00 a.m., New York City time, on the day of receipt, or (ii) the Business Day immediately following the day that the Borrower receives a notice of such LC Disbursement from the Administrative Agent, if such notice is not received prior to such time on the day of receipt; provided that, with respect to any such payment owing by the Borrower prior to the Revolving Commitment Termination Date, the Borrower may, subject to the conditions to borrowing set forth herein, request in accordance with Section 2.03 (or Section 2.22 in the case of a Swingline Loan) that such payment be financed with an Alternate Base Rate Loan or a Swingline Loan in an equivalent amount and, to the extent so financed, the Borrower’s obligation to make such payment shall be discharged and replaced by the resulting Borrowing. If the Borrower fails to make such payment when due, the Administrative Agent shall notify each Lender of the applicable LC Disbursement, the payment then due from the Borrower in respect thereof and such Lender’s Applicable Percentage thereof. Promptly following receipt of such notice, each Lender shall pay to the Administrative Agent its Applicable Percentage of the payment then due from the Borrower, in the same manner as provided in Section 2.12 with respect to Loans made by such Lender (and Section 2.12 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to the payment obligations of the Lenders), and the Administrative Agent shall promptly pay to such Issuing Bank the amounts so received by the Administrative Agent from the Lenders. Promptly following receipt by the Administrative Agent of any payment from the Borrower pursuant to this paragraph, the Administrative Agent shall distribute such payment to such Issuing Bank or, to the extent that the Lenders have made payments pursuant to this paragraph to reimburse such Issuing Bank, then to such Lenders and such Issuing Bank as their interests may appear. Any payment made by a Lender

25



pursuant to this paragraph to reimburse an Issuing Bank for any LC Disbursement shall not constitute a Loan and shall not relieve the Borrower of its obligation to reimburse such LC Disbursement.
(f)      To the extent permitted by law, the Borrower’s obligation to reimburse LC Disbursements as provided in Section 2.05(e) shall be absolute, unconditional and irrevocable, and shall be performed strictly in accordance with the terms of this Agreement under any and all circumstances whatsoever and irrespective of (i) any lack of validity or enforceability of any Letter of Credit or this Agreement, or any term or provision therein, (ii) any draft or other document presented under a Letter of Credit proving to be forged, fraudulent or invalid in any respect or any statement therein being untrue or inaccurate in any respect, (iii) payment by the Issuing Bank thereof under a Letter of Credit against presentation of a draft or other document that does not comply with the terms of such Letter of Credit, or (iv) any other event or circumstance whatsoever, whether or not similar to any of the foregoing, that might, but for the provisions of this Section, constitute a legal or equitable discharge of, or provide a right of setoff against, the Borrower’s obligations hereunder. To the extent permitted by law, none of the Administrative Agent, the Lenders, or the Issuing Banks, or any of their Related Parties, shall have any liability or responsibility by reason of or in connection with the issuance or transfer of any Letter of Credit or any payment or failure to make any payment thereunder (irrespective of any of the circumstances referred to in the preceding sentence), or any error, omission, interruption, loss or delay in transmission or delivery of any draft, notice or other communication under or relating to any Letter of Credit (including any document required to make a drawing thereunder), any error in interpretation of technical terms or any consequence arising from causes beyond the control of the Issuing Bank thereof; provided that the foregoing shall not be construed to excuse any Issuing Bank from liability to the Borrower to the extent of any direct damages (as opposed to consequential damages, claims in respect of which are hereby waived by the Borrower to the extent permitted by applicable law) suffered by the Borrower that are caused by such Issuing Bank’s failure to exercise care when determining whether drafts and other documents presented under a Letter of Credit comply with the terms thereof. To the extent permitted by law, the parties hereto expressly agree that, in the absence of gross negligence or willful misconduct on the part of an Issuing Bank, such Issuing Bank shall be deemed to have exercised care in each such determination. In furtherance of the foregoing and without limiting the generality thereof, the parties agree that, with respect to documents presented which appear on their face to be in substantial compliance with the terms of a Letter of Credit, the Issuing Bank thereof may, in its sole discretion, either accept and make payment upon such documents without responsibility for further investigation, regardless of any notice or information to the contrary, or refuse to accept and make payment upon such documents if such documents are not in strict compliance with the terms of such Letter of Credit.
(g)      An Issuing Bank shall, promptly following its receipt thereof, examine all documents purporting to represent a demand for payment under a Letter of Credit issued thereby. Such Issuing Bank shall promptly notify the Administrative Agent and the Borrower by telephone (confirmed by facsimile) of such demand for payment and whether such Issuing Bank has made or will make an LC Disbursement thereunder; provided that any failure to give or delay in giving such notice shall not relieve the Borrower of its obligation to reimburse such Issuing Bank and the Lenders with respect to any such LC Disbursement.

26



(h)      If an Issuing Bank shall make any LC Disbursement, then, unless the Borrower shall reimburse such LC Disbursement in full on the date specified in Section 2.05(e), the unpaid amount thereof shall bear interest, for each day from and including the date such reimbursement is due pursuant to Section 2.05(e) to but excluding the date that the Borrower reimburses such LC Disbursement, at the rate per annum then applicable to Alternate Base Rate Loans (including the Base Rate Margin); provided that, if the Borrower fails to reimburse such LC Disbursement when due pursuant to Section 2.05(e), then the provisions of Section 2.10(a) pertaining to interest payable on overdue principal shall apply. Interest accrued pursuant to this paragraph shall be for the account of the applicable Issuing Bank, except that interest accrued on and after the date of payment by any Lender pursuant to Section 2.05(e) to reimburse such Issuing Bank shall be for the account of such Lender to the extent of such payment.
(i)      An Issuing Bank may be replaced at any time by written agreement among the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, the replaced Issuing Bank and the successor Issuing Bank. The Administrative Agent shall notify the Lenders of any such replacement of an Issuing Bank. At the time any such replacement shall become effective, the Borrower shall pay all unpaid fees accrued for the account of the replaced Issuing Bank. From and after the effective date of any such replacement, (i) the successor Issuing Bank shall have all the rights and obligations of an Issuing Bank under this Agreement with respect to Letters of Credit to be issued thereafter, and (ii) references herein to the term “ Issuing Bank ” shall be deemed to refer to such successor. After the replacement of an Issuing Bank hereunder, the replaced Issuing Bank shall remain a party hereto and shall continue to have all the rights and obligations of an Issuing Bank under this Agreement with respect to Letters of Credit issued by it prior to such replacement, but shall not be required to issue additional Letters of Credit.
(j)      (i) If any Event of Default shall occur and be continuing, on the Business Day that the Borrower receives notice from the Majority Lenders or, if the maturity of the Loans has been accelerated, from the Administrative Agent or the Majority Lenders, demanding the deposit of cash collateral pursuant to this paragraph or (ii) on the Business Day that the Borrower receives notice from either the Administrative Agent acting alone or the Majority Lenders demanding deposit of cash collateral pursuant to Section 2.08(b) (or, if such notice is received on a day other than a Business Day, on the next Business Day following receipt of such notice), the Borrower shall deposit in an account with the Administrative Agent, in the name of the Administrative Agent and for the benefit of the Lenders, an amount in cash (in the applicable currency) equal to the LC Exposure as of such date plus any accrued and unpaid interest thereon; provided that the obligation to deposit such cash collateral shall become effective immediately, and such deposit shall become immediately due and payable, without demand or other notice of any kind, upon the occurrence of any Event of Default with respect to the Borrower described in Section 8.01(f) or Section 8.01(g). Such deposit shall be held by the Administrative Agent as collateral for the payment and performance of the obligations of the Borrower under this Agreement. The Administrative Agent shall have exclusive dominion and control, including the exclusive right of withdrawal, over such account. Other than any interest earned on the investment of such deposits, which investments shall be made in certificates of deposits of the Administrative Agent or securities backed by the full faith and credit of the United States of America, at the option of the Administrative Agent and at the Borrower’s risk and expense, such deposits shall not bear interest. Interest or profits, if any, on such investments

27



shall accumulate in such account. Monies in such account shall be applied by the Administrative Agent to reimburse the Issuing Banks for LC Disbursements for which it has not been reimbursed and, to the extent not so applied, shall be held for the satisfaction of the reimbursement obligations of the Borrower for the LC Exposure at such time or, if the maturity of the Loans has been accelerated (but subject to the consent of the Majority Lenders), be applied to satisfy other obligations of the Borrower under this Agreement. If the Borrower is required to provide an amount of cash collateral hereunder as a result of the occurrence of an Event of Default, such amount (to the extent not applied as aforesaid) shall be returned to the Borrower within two (2) Business Days after all Events of Default have been cured or waived.
(k)      If at any time that there shall exist a Defaulting Lender, within two (2) Business Days following the written request of the Administrative Agent or any Issuing Bank (with a copy to the Administrative Agent) the Borrower shall cash collateralize the Issuing Banks’ Fronting Exposure. The Borrower, and to the extent provided by any Defaulting Lender, such Defaulting Lender, hereby grants to the Administrative Agent, for the benefit of the Issuing Banks, and agrees to maintain, a first priority security interest in all such cash collateral as security for the Defaulting Lender’s obligation to fund participations in respect of LC Disbursements, to be applied as set forth herein. The cash collateral (or the appropriate portion thereof) provided to reduce any Issuing Bank’s Fronting Exposure shall no longer be required to be held as cash collateral pursuant to this Section 2.05(k) following (i) the elimination of the applicable Fronting Exposure (including by the termination of Defaulting Lender status of the applicable Lender), or (ii) the determination by the Administrative Agent and each Issuing Bank that there exists excess cash collateral.
Section 2.06      Reduction or Termination of Commitments . Unless previously terminated, the Commitments shall terminate on the Revolving Commitment Termination Date. The Borrower shall have the right, upon not less than two (2) Business Days’ notice to the Administrative Agent, to terminate the Commitments or, from time to time, permanently reduce the amount of the Commitments; provided, however , that the Borrower shall not terminate or reduce any Commitment if, after giving effect to any concurrent repayment of the Loans in accordance with Section 2.07 and Section 2.08 the total Credit Exposure of the Lenders would exceed the sum of total Commitments. Any reduction shall be accompanied by prepayment of the Loans to the extent, if any, that the total Credit Exposure of the Lenders then outstanding exceeds the sum of the total Commitments as then reduced. Any termination of the Commitments shall be accompanied by prepayment in full of the Loans then outstanding and the payment of any unpaid fees then accrued hereunder. Upon receipt of such notice, the Administrative Agent shall promptly notify each Lender thereof. Any partial reduction shall be in an amount of $5,000,000 or a whole multiple thereof and shall reduce permanently the total amount of the Commitments, together with a corresponding reduction in the aggregate amount of each Lender’s applicable Commitment. The Commitments once terminated or reduced may not be reinstated. Each reduction of the Commitments shall be made ratably among the Lenders in accordance with their Commitments (except for in connection with the termination of this Agreement as to any Lender pursuant to Section 10.13).

28



Section 2.07      Optional Prepayments .
(a)      The Borrower may, at its option, as provided in this Section 2.07, at any time and from time to time prepay the Loans payable by the Borrower, in whole or in part, upon notice to the Administrative Agent (and, in the case of prepayments of Swingline Loans, the Swingline Lender), specifying (i) the date and amount of prepayment, and (ii) the respective amounts to be prepaid in respect of such Loans. Upon receipt of such prepayment notice, the Administrative Agent shall promptly notify each Lender thereof. The payment amount specified in such notice shall be due and payable on the date specified. All prepayments pursuant to this Section 2.07 shall include accrued interest on the amount prepaid to the date of prepayment and, in the case of prepayments of Eurodollar Loans, any amounts payable pursuant to Section 2.21. The Loans shall also be subject to prepayment as provided in Section 2.06, Section 2.08 and Section 10.13.
(b)      Partial optional prepayments pursuant to this Section 2.07 shall be in an aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000 or any whole multiple of $1,000,000 in excess thereof. All prepayments of Loans pursuant to this Section 2.07 shall be without the payment by the Borrower of any premium or penalty except for amounts payable pursuant to Section 2.21.
Section 2.08      Mandatory Prepayments .
(a)      If at any time the total Credit Exposures of the Lenders exceeds the sum of the total Commitments, the Borrower shall prepay the Loans owing by it to such Lenders in an amount equal to such excess. Each prepayment of Loans pursuant to this Section 2.08 shall be accompanied by payment of accrued interest on the amount prepaid to the date of prepayment and, in the case of prepayments of Eurodollar Loans, any amounts payable pursuant to Section 2.21.
(b)      If after giving effect to the prepayment of all Loans pursuant to Section 2.08(a), any excess remains as a result of LC Exposure, the Borrower shall provide cash collateral to cover any such excess caused by LC Exposure.
Section 2.09      Commitment Increases .
(a)      So long as no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, the Borrower may request from time to time after the Effective Date, that the aggregate amount of the Commitments be increased (each a “ Commitment Increase ”) by delivering a Notice of Commitment Increase; provided, however , that:
(i)      no Lender’s Commitment may ever be increased without its prior written consent;
(ii)      any Notice of Commitment Increase must be given no later than three (3) Business Days prior to the Revolving Commitment Termination Date;
(iii)      the effective date of any Commitment Increase (the “ Commitment Increase Effective Date ”) shall be no earlier than three (3) Business Days after receipt by the Administrative Agent of such Notice of Commitment Increase;

29



(iv)      the amount of any Commitment Increase must be at least $10,000,000 or such lesser amount as the Administrative Agent may agree to in its sole discretion; and
(v)      after giving effect to any requested Commitment Increase, the aggregate amount of the Commitments shall not exceed $2,000,000,000.
(b)      On each Commitment Increase Effective Date, so long as no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, each Commitment Increase shall become effective on its Commitment Increase Effective Date and upon such effectiveness:
(i)      the Administrative Agent shall record in the Register each CI Lender’s information, if necessary, as provided in the Notice of Commitment Increase and pursuant to an Administrative Questionnaire that shall be completed and delivered by each CI Lender to the Administrative Agent on or before the Commitment Increase Effective Date;
(ii)      the Administrative Agent shall distribute to each Lender (including each CI Lender) a copy of the Annex I attached to the Notice of Commitment Increase relating to such Commitment Increase;
(iii)      each CI Lender identified on the Notice of Commitment Increase for such Commitment Increase shall be a “ Lender ” for all purposes under this Agreement;
(iv)      to the extent there are Revolving Loans outstanding as of such date:
(A)      each CI Lender shall, by wire transfer of immediately available funds, deliver to the Administrative Agent such CI Lender’s New Funds Amount for the applicable Commitment Increase Effective Date, which amount, for each such CI Lender, shall constitute Revolving Loans made by such CI Lender to the Borrower pursuant to this Agreement on such Commitment Increase Effective Date; and
(B)      the Administrative Agent shall, by wire transfer of immediately available funds, pay to each then Reducing Percentage Lender its Reduction Amount for such Commitment Increase Effective Date, which amount, for each such Reducing Percentage Lender, shall constitute a prepayment by the Borrower pursuant to Section 2.07, ratably in accordance with the respective principal amounts thereof, of the principal amounts of all then outstanding Revolving Loans of such Reducing Percentage Lender; and
(v)      To the extent there is any Letter of Credit outstanding as of such Commitment Increase Effective Date, each CI Lender shall be deemed to have acquired, and each Reducing Percentage Lender shall be deemed to have transferred, such portions of the existing participations in such Letter of Credit as shall cause

30



the participations therein of all Lenders to be pro rata in accordance with the Applicable Percentages of all Lenders on such Commitment Increase Effective Date (after giving effect to the Commitment Increases of all Lenders).
Section 2.10      Interest .
(a)      Each Eurodollar Loan shall bear interest for each day during each Interest Period with respect thereto on the Principal Amount thereof at a rate per annum equal to the LIBO Rate for such Interest Period plus the Eurodollar Margin for such day. Each Alternate Base Rate Loan shall bear interest on the Principal Amount thereof at a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Alternate Base Rate plus the Base Rate Margin. Each Swingline Loan shall bear interest on the Principal Amount of such Loan at a rate per annum equal, at the option of the Borrower, to (i) the Alternate Base Rate plus the applicable Base Rate Margin or (ii) the LIBO Rate for a one month Interest Period on such day (or if such day is not a Business Day, the immediately preceding Business Day) plus the applicable Eurodollar Margin. Upon the occurrence and continuance of any Event of Default occurring pursuant to Section 8.01(a), Section 8.01(f) or Section 8.01(g), all Loans outstanding and such overdue amount, in the case of a failure to pay amounts when due, shall automatically bear interest (as well after as before judgment), at a rate per annum which is two percent (2%) above the rate which would otherwise be applicable to such Loan pursuant to whichever of the three preceding sentences shall apply (the “ Post-Default Rate ”) until paid in full. Upon the occurrence and continuance of any Event of Default other than those listed in the previous sentence, all Loans outstanding shall bear interest at the Post-Default Rate upon the written election of the Majority Lenders. Interest shall be payable in arrears on each Interest Payment Date; provided, however , that interest payable on overdue principal shall be payable on demand.
(b)      Each Borrowing initially shall be of the Type specified in the applicable Borrowing Request and, in the case of a Eurodollar Loan, shall have an initial Interest Period as specified in such Borrowing Request. Thereafter, the Borrower may elect to continue such Borrowing to a different Type or to continue such Borrowing for an additional Interest Period (and elect Interest Periods therefor), all as provided in this Section. The Borrower may elect different options with respect to different portions of the affected Borrowing, in which case each such portion shall be allocated ratably among the Lenders holding the Loans comprising such Borrowing, and the Loans comprising each such portion shall then and thereafter be considered a separate Borrowing. This Section, as it refers to Types of Loans, shall not apply to Swingline Loans, which may not be converted or continued.
(c)      To make an election pursuant to this Section, the Borrower shall notify the Administrative Agent of such election (the “ Interest Election Request ”) by telephone by the time that a Borrowing Request would be required under Section 2.03 if the Borrower were requesting a Borrowing of the Type resulting from such election to be made on the effective date of such election. Each such telephonic Interest Election Request shall be irrevocable and shall be confirmed promptly by hand delivery or facsimile to the Administrative Agent of a written Interest Election Request in a form approved by the Administrative Agent and signed by the Borrower.
(d)      Each telephonic and written Interest Election Request shall identify the Borrower and specify the following information in compliance with Section 2.03:

31



(i)      the Borrowing to which such Interest Election Request applies and, if different options are being elected with respect to different portions thereof, the portions thereof to be allocated to each resulting Borrowing (in which case the information to be specified pursuant to clauses (iii) and (iv) below shall be specified for each resulting Borrowing);
(ii)      the effective date of the election made pursuant to such Interest Election Request, which shall be a Business Day;
(iii)      whether the resulting Borrowing is to be an Alternate Base Rate Borrowing or a Eurodollar Borrowing; and
(iv)      if the resulting Borrowing is a Eurodollar Borrowing, the Interest Period to be applicable thereto after giving effect to such election, which shall be a period contemplated by the definition of the term “ Interest Period.
(e)      If any such Interest Election Request requests a Eurodollar Borrowing but does not specify an Interest Period, then the Borrower shall be deemed to have selected an Interest Period of one month’s duration.
(f)      Promptly following receipt of an Interest Election Request, the Administrative Agent shall advise each Lender of the details thereof and of such Lender’s obligation with respect to each resulting Borrowing.
(g)      If the Borrower fails to deliver a timely Interest Election Request with respect to a Eurodollar Loan prior to the end of the Interest Period applicable thereto, then, unless such Borrowing is repaid as provided herein, at the end of such Interest Period such Borrowing shall be continued as an Alternate Base Rate Loan. Notwithstanding any contrary provision hereof, if an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing and the Administrative Agent, at the request of the Majority Lenders, so notifies the Borrower, then, so long as such Event of Default is continuing (i) no outstanding Borrowing may be continued as a Eurodollar Loan, and (ii) unless repaid, each Eurodollar Loan shall be continued as an Alternate Base Rate Loan at the end of the Interest Period applicable thereto.
Section 2.11      Computation of Interest and Fees .
(a)      All interest, as well as fees and other charges calculated on a per annum basis, shall be computed for the actual days elapsed, based on a year of 360 days, provided that in the case of interest on Loans computed by reference to the Alternate Base Rate at times when the Alternate Base Rate is based on the Prime Rate, interest will be determined on the basis of a year of 365 days (or 366 days in a leap year). The Administrative Agent shall notify the Borrower and the Lenders of each determination of a LIBO Rate and of the interest rate applicable to each Swingline Loan. Any change in the interest rate resulting from a change in the Alternate Base Rate shall become effective as of the opening of business on the day on which such change in the applicable rate shall become effective. The Administrative Agent shall notify the Borrower and the Lenders of the effective date and the amount of each such change in the Alternate Base Rate.

32



(b)      The Administrative Agent shall, at the request of the Borrower, deliver to the Borrower a statement showing the computations used by the Administrative Agent in determining any interest rate pursuant to Section 2.11(a).
Section 2.12      Funding of Borrowings .
(a)      Each Lender shall make each Loan to be made by it hereunder on the proposed Borrowing Date thereof by wire transfer of immediately available funds by 3:00 p.m., New York City time, to the account of the Administrative Agent most recently designated by it for such purpose by notice to the Lenders; provided that Swingline Loans shall be made as provided in Section 2.22. The Administrative Agent will make such Loans available to the Borrower by promptly crediting the amounts so received, in like funds, to an account of the Borrower designated by the Borrower in the applicable Borrowing Request; provided that Alternate Base Rate Loans made to finance the reimbursement of an LC Disbursement as provided in Section 2.05(e) shall be remitted by the Administrative Agent to the Issuing Bank making such LC Disbursement.
(b)      Unless the Administrative Agent shall have received notice from a Lender prior to the proposed time of any Borrowing that such Lender will not make available to the Administrative Agent such Lender’s share of such Borrowing, the Administrative Agent may assume that such Lender has made such share available on such date in accordance with Section 2.12(a) and may, in reliance upon such assumption, make available to the Borrower a corresponding amount. In such event, if a Lender has not in fact made its share of the applicable Borrowing available to the Administrative Agent, then each such Lender and the Borrower severally agree to pay to the Administrative Agent forthwith on demand such corresponding amount with interest thereon, for each day from and including the date such amount is made available to the Borrower to but excluding the date of payment to the Administrative Agent, at (i) in the case of a payment to be made by such Lender, the greater of the cost incurred by the Administrative Agent for making such Lender’s share of such Borrowing and a rate determined by the Administrative Agent in accordance with customary banking industry practices on interbank compensation with reasonable evidence thereof, or (ii) in the case of a payment to be made by the Borrower, the interest rate applicable to Alternate Base Rate Loans. If the Borrower and such Lender shall pay such interest to the Administrative Agent for the same or an overlapping period, the Administrative Agent shall promptly remit to the Borrower the amount of such interest paid by the Borrower for such period. If such Lender pays its share of the applicable Borrowing to the Administrative Agent, then the amount so paid shall constitute such Lender’s Loan included in such Borrowing. Any payment by the Borrower shall be without prejudice to any claim the Borrower may have against a Lender that shall have failed to make such payment to the Administrative Agent.
(c)      Unless the Administrative Agent shall have received notice from the Borrower prior to the date on which any payment is due to the Administrative Agent for the account of the Lenders or an Issuing Bank hereunder that the Borrower will not make such payment, the Administrative Agent may assume that the Borrower has made such payment on such date in accordance herewith and may, in reliance upon such assumption, distribute to the Lenders or such Issuing Bank, as the case may be, the amount due. In such event, if the Borrower has not in fact made such payment, then each of the Lenders and such Issuing Bank, as the case may be, severally

33



agrees to repay to the Administrative Agent forthwith on demand the amount so distributed to such Lender or such Issuing Bank with interest thereon, for each day from and including the date such amount is distributed to it to but excluding the date of payment to the Administrative Agent, at the greater of the cost incurred by the Administrative Agent for making such distributed amount and a rate determined by the Administrative Agent in accordance with banking industry rules on interbank compensation.
Section 2.13      Pro Rata Treatment and Payments .
(a)      Each Borrowing by the Borrower from the Lenders, each payment (including each prepayment) by the Borrower on account of the principal of and interest on the Loans and on account of any fees hereunder, any reimbursement of LC Disbursements, and any reduction of the Commitments of the Lenders hereunder shall be made pro rata according to the Commitments, except that (i) payments or prepayments, and offsets against or reductions from the amount of payments and prepayments, in each case, specifically for the account of a particular Lender under the terms of Section 2.04, Section 2.09(b), Section 2.14, Section 2.15, Section 2.16, Section 2.21, Section 2.22, Section 10.03 or Section 10.13 shall be made for the account of such Lender (or the Swingline Lender in the case of Section 2.22), and (ii) if any Lender shall become a Defaulting Lender, from and after the date upon which such Lender shall have become a Defaulting Lender, any payment made on account of principal of or interest on the Loans shall be applied in accordance with Section 2.23(b). All payments (including prepayments) to be made by the Borrower on account of principal, interest, reimbursement of LC Disbursements and fees shall be made in immediately available funds without setoff or counterclaim and shall be made to the Administrative Agent on behalf of the Lenders (or on behalf of an Issuing Bank or the Swingline Lender, as the case may be) at the Administrative Agent’s office as notified to the Borrower from time to time at least five (5) Business Days before any change in such office. On the date of this Agreement, the office of the Administrative Agent is located at Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Houston Energy Group, 1000 Louisiana Street, 9th Floor, MAC T0002-090, Houston, TX 77002, Attention of Mark Cox, Facsimile No.: (713) 319-1679. The Administrative Agent shall distribute such payments to the Lenders promptly upon receipt in like funds as received. Reimbursement of all LC Disbursements shall be made as required by Section 2.05(e).
(b)      If any payment hereunder (other than payments on the Eurodollar Loans) becomes due and payable on a day other than a Business Day, such payment shall be extended to the next succeeding Business Day, and with respect to payments of principal, interest thereon shall be payable at the then applicable rate during such extension. If any payment on a Eurodollar Loan becomes due and payable on a day other than a Business Day, the maturity thereof shall be extended to the next succeeding Business Day unless the result of such extension would be to extend such payment into another calendar month in which event such payment shall be made on the immediately preceding Business Day.
(c)      Except as provided in Section 2.04(c), Section 2.09(b), Section 2.14, Section 2.15, Section 2.16, Section 2.21, Section 2.24, Section 10.03, Section 10.13, and this Section 2.13, if any Lender shall, by exercising any right of set-off or counterclaim or otherwise, obtain payment in respect of any principal of or interest on any of its Loans, LC Exposure, Swingline Exposure or

34



other obligations hereunder resulting in such Lender receiving payment of a proportion of the aggregate amount of its Loans and accrued interest thereon, LC Exposure, Swingline Exposure or other such obligations greater than its pro rata share thereof as provided herein, then the Lender receiving such greater proportion shall (x) notify the Administrative Agent of such fact, and (y) purchase (for cash at face value) participations in the Loans, LC Exposure, Swingline Exposure and such other obligations of the other Lenders, or make such other adjustments as shall be equitable, so that the benefit of all such payments shall be shared by the Lenders ratably in accordance with the aggregate amount of principal of and accrued interest on their respective Loans, LC Exposure, Swingline Exposure and other amounts owing them; provided that:
(i)      if any such participations are purchased and all or any portion of the payment giving rise thereto is recovered, such participations shall be rescinded and the purchase price restored to the extent of such recovery, without interest, and
(ii)      the provisions of this paragraph shall not be construed to apply to (A) any payment made by the Borrower pursuant to and in accordance with the express terms of this Agreement (including the application of funds arising from the existence of a Defaulting Lender), or (B) any payment obtained by a Lender as consideration for the assignment of or sale of a participation in any of its Loans or participations in LC Disbursements to any assignee or participant, other than to the Borrower or any Subsidiary or Affiliate thereof (as to which the provisions of this paragraph shall apply).
The Borrower consents to the foregoing and agrees, to the extent it may effectively do so under applicable law, that any Lender acquiring a participation pursuant to the foregoing arrangements may exercise against the Borrower rights of set-off and counterclaim with respect to such participation as fully as if such Lender were a direct creditor of the Borrower in the amount of such participation.
(d)      If any Lender shall fail to make any payment required to be made by it pursuant to Section 2.05(d), Section 2.05(e), Section 2.09(b), Section 2.12(b) or Section 2.12(c), then the Administrative Agent may, in its discretion (notwithstanding any contrary provision hereof), apply any amounts thereafter received by the Administrative Agent for the account of such Lender to satisfy such Lender’s obligations under such Sections until all such unsatisfied obligations are fully paid.
Section 2.14      Increased Cost of Loans .
(a)      If any Change in Law shall:
(i)      impose, modify or hold applicable any reserve, special deposit, compulsory loan, insurance charge or similar requirement against assets held by, or deposits or other liabilities in or for the account of, advances or loans by, or other credit extended or participated in by, or any other acquisition of funds by, any office of such Lender or such Issuing Bank;

35



(ii)      subjects any Lender or Issuing Bank to any Taxes (other than (A) Indemnified Taxes, or (B) Excluded Taxes) on its loans, loan principal, letters of credit, commitments, or other obligations, or its deposits, reserves, other liabilities or capital attributable thereto; or
(iii)      impose on such Lender or such Issuing Bank or the London interbank market any other condition, cost or expense (other than Taxes) affecting this Agreement, any Note or the Eurodollar Loans, or any Letter of Credit or participation therein;
and the result of any of the foregoing is to increase the cost to such Lender of making, converting to, continuing or maintaining any Loan (or of maintaining its obligation to make any such Loan) or to increase the cost to such Lender or such Issuing Bank of participating in, issuing or maintaining any Letter of Credit (or of maintaining its obligation to participate in or to issue any Letter of Credit), or to reduce any amount received or receivable by such Lender or such Issuing Bank hereunder or under any Note (whether of principal, interest, or otherwise), then, in any such case, the Borrower shall pay such Lender or such Issuing Bank, as the case may be, upon written demand being made to the Borrower by such Lender or such Issuing Bank, as the case may be, such additional amount or amounts which will compensate such Lender or such Issuing Bank, as the case may be, for such amounts as such Lender or such Issuing Bank reasonably deems to be material with respect to this Agreement, the Notes, the Letters of Credit, or the Loans hereunder, provided, however , that if all or any such additional cost would not have been payable, or such reduction would not have occurred, but for such Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s decision to designate a new Eurodollar Lending Office or Domestic Lending Office or refusal to change to another Eurodollar Lending Office or Domestic Lending Office as provided below, the Borrower shall have no obligation under this Section 2.14 to compensate such Lender or such Issuing Bank for such amount. Such demand shall be accompanied by a certificate of a duly authorized officer of such Lender or such Issuing Bank setting forth the amount of such payment and the basis therefor. Each Lender and each Issuing Bank shall also give written notice to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent of any event occurring after the date of this Agreement which would entitle such Lender or such Issuing Bank to compensation pursuant to this Section 2.14 as promptly as practicable after it obtains knowledge thereof and determines to request such compensation and will designate a different Eurodollar Lending Office or a Domestic Lending Office if such designation will avoid the need for, or reduce the amount of, such compensation and will not, in the sole opinion of such Lender, be disadvantageous to such Lender. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that any Lender or Issuing Bank shall demand payment pursuant to this Section 2.14, the Borrower may, upon at least two (2) Business Days’ notice to the Administrative Agent and such Lender, continue in whole (but not in part) the Eurodollar Loans of such Lender into Alternate Base Rate Loans without regard to the requirements of Section 2.10.
(b)      If any Lender or any Issuing Bank shall have reasonably determined any Change in Law affecting such Lender or Issuing Bank or any lending office of such Lender or such Lender’s or Issuing Bank’s holding company, if any, regarding capital or liquidity requirements,

36



has or would have the effect of reducing the rate of return on such Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s capital, or in the capital of such Lender’s or Issuing Bank’s holding company, if any, as a consequence of its obligations hereunder to a level below that which such Lender or such Issuing Bank, or such Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s holding company, could have achieved but for such Change in Law (taking into consideration such Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s policies and the policies of such Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s holding company with respect to capital adequacy and liquidity) by an amount reasonably deemed by such Lender to be material, then from time to time, after submission by such Lender or such Issuing Bank to the Borrower (with a copy to the Administrative Agent) of a written request therefor, the Borrower shall pay to such Lender or such Issuing Bank such additional amount or amounts as will compensate such Lender or Issuing Bank or such Lender’s or Issuing Bank’s holding company for such reduction from and after such date the Borrower receives the request; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not apply to any capital adequacy or liquidity requirement imposed solely by reason of any business combination effected after the date hereof.
(c)      A certificate of a Lender or an Issuing Bank setting forth the amount or amounts necessary to compensate such Lender or such Issuing Bank or its holding company, as the case may be, as specified in paragraph (a) or (b) of this Section 2.14 shall be delivered to the Borrower and shall be prima facie evidence of the amount of such payment. The Borrower shall pay such Lender or such Issuing Bank, as the case may be, the amount shown as due on any such certificate within ten (10) days after receipt thereof.
(d)      Failure or delay on the part of any Lender or any Issuing Bank to demand compensation pursuant to this Section 2.14 shall not constitute a waiver of such Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s right to demand such compensation; provided that the Borrower shall not be required to compensate a Lender or an Issuing Bank pursuant to this Section 2.14 for any increased costs incurred or reductions suffered more than 270 days prior to the date that such Lender or such Issuing Bank, as the case may be, notifies the Borrower of the Change in Law giving rise to such increased costs or reductions and of such Lender’s or such Issuing Bank’s intention to claim compensation therefor; provided further that, if the Change in Law giving rise to such increased costs or reductions is retroactive, then the 270-day period referred to above shall be extended to include the period of retroactive effect thereof.
Section 2.15      Illegality . Notwithstanding anything herein contained, if any Lender shall make a good faith determination that a Change in Law shall make it unlawful for such Lender to give effect to its obligations to make, continue or maintain its Eurodollar Loans under this Agreement, the obligation of such Lender to make, continue or maintain Eurodollar Loans hereunder shall be suspended for the duration of such illegality. Such Lender, by written notice to the Administrative Agent and the Borrower, shall declare that such Lender’s obligation to make Eurodollar Loans and to, continue and maintain Eurodollar Loans shall be suspended, and the Borrower, on the last day of the then current Interest Period applicable to such Eurodollar Loans or portion thereof or, if such Lender so requests, on such earlier date as may be required by relevant law, shall continue such Eurodollar Loans or portion thereof as Alternate Base Rate Loans without regard to the requirements of Section 2.10. If and when such illegality ceases to exist, such suspension shall cease and such Lender shall notify the Borrower and the Administrative Agent

37



thereof and any Loans previously continued from Eurodollar Loans to Alternate Base Rate Loans pursuant to this Section 2.15 shall be continued as Loans of Types corresponding to the Loans maintained by the other Lenders on the last day of the Interest Period of the corresponding Eurodollar Loans of such other Lenders.
Section 2.16      Taxes .
(a)      Any and all payments by or on account of any obligation of the Borrower under each Loan Document shall be made free and clear of and without deduction or withholding for any Taxes, except as required by applicable law. If any applicable law (as determined in the good faith discretion of an applicable Withholding Agent) requires the deduction or withholding of any Tax from any such payment by a Withholding Agent, then (i) the sum payable shall be increased as necessary so that after making all required deductions or withholding (including deductions or withholding of Indemnified Taxes applicable to additional sums payable under this Section), the Administrative Agent, any Lender or any Issuing Bank (as the case may be) receives an amount equal to the sum it would have received had no such deductions or withholding of Indemnified Taxes been made, (ii) the applicable Withholding Agent shall make such deductions or withholding, and (iii) the applicable Withholding Agent shall pay the full amount deducted or withheld to the relevant Governmental Authority in accordance with applicable law.
(b)      In addition, the Borrower shall pay any Other Taxes to the relevant Governmental Authority in accordance with applicable law, or at the option of the Administrative Agent timely reimburse it for the payment of, any Other Taxes.
(c)      The Borrower shall indemnify the Administrative Agent, each Lender and each Issuing Bank, within ten (10) days after written demand therefor, for the full amount of any Indemnified Taxes paid or payable by the Administrative Agent, such Lender or such Issuing Bank, as the case may be, on or with respect to any payment by or on account of any obligation of the Borrower under each Loan Document (including Indemnified Taxes imposed or asserted on or attributable to amounts payable under this Section) and any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses arising therefrom or with respect thereto, whether or not such Indemnified Taxes were correctly or legally imposed or asserted by the relevant Governmental Authority. A certificate as to the amount of such payment or liability delivered to the Borrower by a Lender or an Issuing Bank, or by the Administrative Agent on its own behalf or on behalf of a Lender or an Issuing Bank, shall be conclusive absent manifest error. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, none of the Administrative Agent, any Lender or Issuing Bank shall be indemnified for any Indemnified Taxes hereunder unless the Administrative Agent, such Lender or Issuing Bank shall make written demand on Borrower for such reimbursement no later than 270 days after the earlier of (i) the date on which the relevant Governmental Authority makes written demand upon the Administrative Agent, such Lender or Issuing Bank for payment of such Indemnified Taxes, and (ii) the date on which the Administrative Agent, such Lender or Issuing Bank has made payment of such Indemnified Taxes; provided that if the Indemnified Taxes imposed or asserted giving rise to such claims are retroactive, then the 270-day period referred to above shall be extended to include the period of retroactive effect thereof.

38



(d)      As soon as practicable after any payment of Indemnified Taxes or Other Taxes by the Borrower to a Governmental Authority, the Borrower shall deliver to the Administrative Agent the original or a certified copy of a receipt issued by such Governmental Authority evidencing such payment, a copy of the return reporting such payment or other evidence of such payment reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent.
(e)      (i) Any Lender that is entitled to an exemption from or reduction of withholding Tax with respect to payments made under any Loan Document shall deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent, at the time or times prescribed by applicable law or reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent, such properly completed and executed documentation reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent as will permit such payments to be made without withholding or at a reduced rate of withholding. In addition, any Lender, if reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent, shall deliver such other documentation prescribed by applicable law or reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent as will enable the Borrower or the Administrative Agent to determine whether or not such Lender is subject to backup withholding or information reporting requirements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the preceding two sentences, the completion, execution and submission of such documentation (other than such documentation set forth in Section 2.16(e) (ii)(A), (ii)(B) and (ii)(D) below) shall not be required if in the Lender’s reasonable judgment such completion, execution or submission would subject such Lender to any material unreimbursed cost or expense or would materially prejudice the legal or commercial position of such Lender.
(ii)      Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
(A)      any Lender that is a U.S. Person shall deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent on or prior to the date on which such Lender becomes a Lender under this Agreement (and from time to time thereafter upon the reasonable request of the Borrower or the Administrative Agent), executed originals of IRS Form W-9 certifying that such Lender is exempt from U.S. federal backup withholding tax;
(B)      any Foreign Lender shall, to the extent it is legally entitled to do so, deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent (in such number of copies as shall be requested by the recipient) on or prior to the date on which such Foreign Lender becomes a Lender under this Agreement (and from time to time thereafter upon the reasonable request of the Borrower or the Administrative Agent), whichever of the following is applicable:
(i)      in the case of a Foreign Lender claiming the benefits of an income tax treaty to which the United States is a party (x) with respect to payments of interest under any Loan Document, executed originals of IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E, as applicable, establishing an exemption from, or reduction of, U.S. federal withholding Tax pursuant to the “interest” article of such tax treaty and (y) with respect to any other applicable payments under any Loan Document, IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E, as applicable, establishing an exemption from, or reduction

39



of, U.S. federal withholding Tax pursuant to the “business profits” or “other income” article of such tax treaty;
(ii)      executed originals of IRS Form W-8ECI;
(iii)      in the case of a Foreign Lender claiming the benefits of the exemption for portfolio interest under Section 881(c) of the Code, (x) a certificate substantially in the form of Exhibit D-1 to the effect that such Foreign Lender is not a “bank” within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Code, a “10 percent shareholder” of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(B) of the Code, or a “controlled foreign corporation” described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Code (a “U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate”) and (y) executed originals of IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E, as applicable; or
(iv)      to the extent a Foreign Lender is not the beneficial owner, executed originals of IRS Form W-8IMY, accompanied by IRS Form W-8ECI, IRS Form W-8BEN, a U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate substantially in the form of Exhibit D-2 or Exhibit D-3, IRS Form W-9, and/or other certification documents from each beneficial owner, as applicable; provided that if the Foreign Lender is a partnership and one or more direct or indirect partners of such Foreign Lender are claiming the portfolio interest exemption, such Foreign Lender may provide a U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate substantially in the form of Exhibit D-4 on behalf of each such direct and indirect partner;
(A)      any Foreign Lender shall, to the extent it is legally entitled to do so, deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent (in such number of copies as shall be requested by the recipient) on or prior to the date on which such Foreign Lender becomes a Lender under this Agreement (and from time to time thereafter upon the reasonable request of the Borrower or the Administrative Agent), executed originals of any other form prescribed by applicable law as a basis for claiming exemption from or a reduction in U.S. federal withholding Tax, duly completed, together with such supplementary documentation as may be prescribed by applicable law to permit the Borrower or the Administrative Agent to determine the withholding or deduction required to be made; and
(B)      if a payment made to a Lender or the Administrative Agent under any Loan Document would be subject to U.S. federal withholding Tax imposed by FATCA if such Lender or Administrative Agent were to fail to comply with the applicable reporting requirements of FATCA (including those contained in Section 1471(b) or 1472(b) of the Code, as applicable), such Lender or the Administrative Agent shall deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent at the time or times prescribed by law and at such time or times reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent such documentation prescribed by applicable law (including as prescribed by Section 1471(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Code) and such additional documentation reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent as may be necessary for the Borrower and the Administrative Agent to comply with

40



their obligations under FATCA and to determine that such Lender or Administrative Agent has complied with its obligations under FATCA or to determine the amount to deduct and withhold from such payment. Solely for purposes of this clause (D), “FATCA” shall include any amendments made to FATCA after the date of this Agreement.
Each Lender and the Administrative Agent agrees that if any form or certification it previously delivered expires or becomes obsolete or inaccurate in any respect, it shall update such form or certification or promptly notify the Borrower and the Administrative Agent in writing of its legal inability to do so.
(f)      If the Administrative Agent or a Lender determines, in its sole discretion, that it has received a refund of any Taxes as to which it has been indemnified by the Borrower or with respect to which the Borrower has paid additional amounts pursuant to this Section 2.16, it shall pay over such refund to the Borrower (but only to the extent of indemnity payments made, or additional amounts paid, by the Borrower under this Section 2.16 with respect to the Taxes giving rise to such refund), net of all out-of-pocket expenses of the Administrative Agent or such Lender and without interest (other than any interest paid by the relevant Governmental Authority with respect to such refund); provided, however , that the Borrower, upon the request of the Administrative Agent or such Lender, agrees to forthwith repay the amount paid over to the Borrower (plus any penalties, interest or other charges imposed by the relevant Governmental Authority) to the Administrative Agent or such Lender in the event the Administrative Agent or such Lender is required to repay such refund to such Governmental Authority. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 2.16(f), in no event will the Administrative Agent or any Lender be required to pay any amount to the Borrower pursuant to this Section 2.16(f) the payment of which would place the Administrative Agent or Lender in a less favorable net after-Tax position than the Administrative Agent or Lender would have been in if the Tax subject to indemnification and giving rise to such refund had not been deducted, withheld or otherwise imposed and the indemnification payments or additional amounts with respect to such Tax had never been paid. Nothing contained in this Section 2.16 shall require the Administrative Agent or any Lender to make available its tax returns (or any other information relating to its taxes which it deems confidential) to the Borrower or any other Person.
(g)      If the Borrower is required to pay any Indemnified Taxes or additional amounts to any Lender or any Governmental Authority for the account of any Lender pursuant to Section 2.16, then such Lender shall (at the request of the Borrower) use reasonable efforts to designate a different lending office for funding or booking its Loans hereunder or to assign its rights and obligations hereunder to another of its offices, branches or affiliates, if, in the judgment of such Lender, such designation or assignment (a) would eliminate or reduce amounts payable pursuant to Section 2.16, in the future and (b) would not subject such Lender to any unreimbursed cost or expense and would not otherwise be disadvantageous to such Lender. The Borrower hereby agrees to pay all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by any Lender in connection with any such designation or assignment.

41



(h)      For purposes of this Section 2.16, the term “Lender” includes any Issuing Bank and the term “applicable law” includes FATCA.
Section 2.17      Substitute Loan Basis . Unless and until a Replacement Rate is implemented in accordance with Section 2.25 below, in the event that prior to the commencement of any Interest Period for any Eurodollar Borrowing the Majority Lenders shall reasonably determine (which determination shall be final and conclusive and binding upon the Borrower) that (a) by reason of changes affecting the London Interbank Eurodollar Market, adequate and fair means do not exist for ascertaining the LIBO Rate for such requested Interest Period, or (b) the LIBO Rate will not adequately and fairly reflect the cost to such Lenders of making or maintaining their Loans included in such Borrowing for such Interest Period then, and in any such event, the Administrative Agent shall forthwith give notice to the Borrower and, (i) unless, on the date upon which such Eurodollar Loans were to be made, the Borrower notifies the Administrative Agent that it elects not to borrow on such date, any Eurodollar Loans requested to be made on the first day of such Interest Period shall be made as Alternate Base Rate Loans, (ii) any Loans that were to have been, on the first day of such Interest Period, continued as Eurodollar Loans, shall be continued as Alternate Base Rate Loans on the date upon which such Loans were to have been continued, and (iii) any outstanding Eurodollar Loans shall be continued, on the last day of the Interest Period applicable thereto, as Alternate Base Rate Loans on the date upon which such Loans are to be continued. The Administrative Agent shall give written notice to the Borrower of any event occurring after the giving of such notice which permits an adequate and fair means of ascertaining the LIBO Rate and until such notice by the Administrative Agent, no further Eurodollar Loans shall be made or continued as such, nor shall the Borrower have the right to continue as Eurodollar Loans.
Section 2.18      Certain Prepayments or Continuations . If the Eurodollar Loans of any Lender are prepaid or continued as Alternate Base Rate Loans pursuant to Section 2.14 or Section 2.15 (such Eurodollar Loans being herein called “ Affected Loans ”), unless and until such Lender gives written notice that the circumstances which gave rise to such prepayment or continuation no longer exist (which such Lender agrees to do promptly upon such circumstances ceasing to exist) such Lender shall not make further Affected Loans and all Loans which would otherwise be made by such Lender as, or continued by such Lender into, Affected Loans shall be made instead as, or continued as Alternate Base Rate Loans (on which interest and principal shall be payable simultaneously with the related Loans of the other Lenders).
Section 2.19      Certain Notices . Notices by the Borrower under each of Section 2.03, Section 2.05, Section 2.06, Section 2.07, Section 2.14, Section 2.17, and Section 2.10 and under the definition of “Interest Period” in Section 1.01 (a) shall (unless otherwise specifically provided) be given in writing, by facsimile or by telephone (confirmed promptly in writing), and (b) shall be effective only if received by the Administrative Agent and, in the case of Section 2.14, the Lender involved, not later than 11:30 a.m. (New York City time) on the day specified in the respective Section or definition as the latest day such notice may be given. Notices by the Borrower under each of Section 2.03, Section 2.05, Section 2.06, Section 2.07, Section 2.14, Section 2.17, and Section 2.10 shall be irrevocable.

42



Section 2.20      Minimum Amounts of Eurodollar Borrowings . All Borrowings and continuations of Loans hereunder and all selections of Interest Periods hereunder shall be in such amounts and be made pursuant to such elections so that, after giving effect thereto, the aggregate Principal Amount of the Loans comprising each Eurodollar Borrowing shall be equal to $5,000,000 or a whole multiple of $1,000,000 in excess thereof.
Section 2.21      Break Funding Payments In the event of (a) the payment of any Principal Amount of any Eurodollar Loan other than on the last day of an Interest Period applicable thereto (including as a result of an Event of Default), (b) the continuation of any Eurodollar Loan other than on the last day of the Interest Period applicable thereto, (c) the failure to borrow, continue or prepay any Loan on the date specified in any notice delivered pursuant hereto, (d) the assignment of any Eurodollar Loan other than on the last day of the Interest Period applicable thereto as a result of a request by the Borrower, then, in any such event, the Borrower shall compensate each Lender or each Issuing Bank for the loss, cost and expense attributable to such event. In the case of a Eurodollar Loan, such loss, cost or expense to any Lender shall be deemed to include an amount determined by such Lender to be the excess, if any, of (i) the amount of interest which would have accrued on the Principal Amount of such Loan had such event not occurred, at the LIBO Rate (in the case of a Eurodollar Loan) that would have been applicable to such Loan, for the period from the date of such event to the last day of the then current Interest Period therefor (or, in the case of a failure to borrow or continue, for the period that would have been the Interest Period for such Loan), over (ii) the amount of interest which would accrue on such Principal Amount for such period at the interest rate which such Lender would bid were it to bid, at the commencement of such period, for dollar deposits of a comparable amount and period from other banks in the Eurodollar market. A certificate of any such Lender setting forth any amount or amounts that such Lender is entitled to receive pursuant to this Section shall be delivered to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent and shall be conclusive absent manifest error. The Borrower shall pay such Lender the amount shown as due on any such certificate within ten (10) days after receipt thereof. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, no Lender shall be entitled to receive any amount or amounts pursuant to this Section if such amount or amounts are attributable solely to the merger or other consolidation of such Lender with another Lender.
Section 2.22      Swingline Loans .
(a)      Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the Swingline Lender agrees to make Swingline Loans to the Borrower from time to time during the Revolving Period, in an aggregate principal amount at any time outstanding that will not result in (i) the aggregate principal amount of outstanding Swingline Loans exceeding $150,000,000 or (ii) the total Credit Exposures exceeding the total Commitments; provided that the Swingline Lender shall not be required to make a Swingline Loan to refinance an outstanding Swingline Loan. Within the foregoing limits and subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the Borrower may borrow, prepay and reborrow Swingline Loans.
(b)      To request a Swingline Loan, the Borrower shall notify the Administrative Agent of such request by telephone (confirmed by facsimile), not later than 3:00 p.m., New York City time, on the day of a proposed Swingline Loan. Each such notice shall be irrevocable and

43



shall specify the Borrower, the requested date (which shall be a Business Day) and amount of the requested Swingline Loan. The Administrative Agent will promptly advise the Swingline Lender of any such notice received from the Borrower. The Swingline Lender shall make each Swingline Loan available to the Borrower by means of a credit to the general deposit account of the Borrower with the Swingline Lender (or, in the case of a Swingline Loan made to finance the reimbursement of an LC Disbursement as provided in Section 2.05(e), by remittance to the Issuing Bank making such LC Disbursement) by 3:00 p.m., New York City time, on the requested date of such Swingline Loan.
(c)      The Swingline Lender may by written notice given to the Administrative Agent not later than 10:00 a.m., New York City time, on any Business Day require the Lenders to acquire participations on such Business Day in all or a portion of the Swingline Loans outstanding. Such notice shall specify the aggregate amount of Swingline Loans in which Lenders will participate. Promptly upon receipt of such notice, the Administrative Agent will give notice thereof to each Lender, specifying in such notice such Lender’s Applicable Percentage of such Swingline Loan or Loans. Each Lender hereby absolutely and unconditionally agrees, upon receipt of notice as provided above, to pay to the Administrative Agent, for the account of the Swingline Lender, such Lender’s Applicable Percentage of such Swingline Loan or Loans. Each Lender acknowledges and agrees that its obligation to acquire participations in Swingline Loans pursuant to this paragraph is absolute and unconditional and shall not be affected by any circumstance whatsoever, including the occurrence and continuance of a Default or Event of Default or reduction or termination of the Commitments, and that each such payment shall be made without any offset, abatement, withholding or reduction whatsoever. Each Lender shall comply with its obligation under this paragraph by wire transfer of immediately available funds, in the same manner as provided in Section 2.12 with respect to Loans made by such Lender (and Section 2.12 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to the payment obligations of the Lenders), and the Administrative Agent shall promptly pay to the Swingline Lender the amounts so received by it from the Lenders. The Administrative Agent shall notify the Borrower of any participations in any Swingline Loan acquired pursuant to this paragraph, and thereafter payments in respect of such Swingline Loan shall be made to the Administrative Agent and not to the Swingline Lender. Any amounts received by the Swingline Lender from the Borrower (or other party on behalf of the Borrower) in respect of a Swingline Loan after receipt by the Swingline Lender of the proceeds of a sale of participations therein shall be promptly remitted to the Administrative Agent; any such amounts received by the Administrative Agent shall be promptly remitted by the Administrative Agent to the Lenders that shall have made their payments pursuant to this paragraph and to the Swingline Lender, as their interests may appear; provided that any such payment so remitted shall be repaid to the Swingline Lender or to the Administrative Agent, as applicable, if and to the extent such payment is required to be refunded to the Borrower for any reason. The purchase of participations in a Swingline Loan pursuant to this paragraph shall not relieve the Borrower of any default in the payment thereof.
(d)      So long as any Lender is a Defaulting Lender, the Swingline Lender shall not be required to fund any Swingline Loan unless it is satisfied that it will have no Fronting Exposure with respect thereto.

44



Section 2.23      Defaulting Lenders . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, if any Lender becomes a Defaulting Lender, then, until such time as such Lender is no longer a Defaulting Lender, to the extent permitted by applicable law:
(a)      Waivers and Amendments . Such Defaulting Lender’s right to approve or disapprove any amendment, waiver or consent with respect to this Agreement shall be restricted as set forth in Section 10.02.
(b)      Reallocation of Payments . Any payment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts received by the Administrative Agent for the account of such Defaulting Lender (whether voluntary or mandatory, at maturity or otherwise, and including any amounts made available to the Administrative Agent for the account of such Defaulting Lender pursuant to Section 10.08), shall be applied at such time or times as may be determined by the Administrative Agent as follows: first , to the payment of any amounts owing by such Defaulting Lender to the Administrative Agent hereunder; second , to the payment on a pro rata basis of any amounts owing by such Defaulting Lender to an Issuing Bank and/or the Swingline Lender hereunder; third , to cash collateralize the Issuing Banks’ Fronting Exposure with respect to such Defaulting Lender in accordance with Section 2.05(k); fourth , if so determined by the Administrative Agent or requested by an Issuing Bank and/or the Swingline Lender, to be held as cash collateral for future funding obligations of such Defaulting Lender of any participation in any Swingline Loan or Letter of Credit; fifth , as the Borrower may request (so long as no Default or Event of Default exists), to the funding of any Loan in respect of which such Defaulting Lender has failed to fund its portion thereof as required by this Agreement, as determined by the Administrative Agent; sixth , if so determined by the Administrative Agent and the Borrower, to be held in a non-interest bearing deposit account and released in order to satisfy obligations of such Defaulting Lender to fund Loans under this Agreement; seventh , to the payment of any amounts owing to the Administrative Agent, the Lenders, the Issuing Banks or the Swingline Lender as a result of any judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction obtained by the Administrative Agent, any Lender, any Issuing Bank or the Swingline Lender against such Defaulting Lender as a result of such Defaulting Lender’s breach of its obligations under this Agreement; eighth , so long as no Default or Event of Default exists, to the payment of any amounts owing to the Borrower as a result of any judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction obtained by the Borrower against such Defaulting Lender as a result of such Defaulting Lender’s breach of its obligations under this Agreement; and ninth , to such Defaulting Lender or as otherwise directed by a court of competent jurisdiction; provided that if (i) such payment is a payment of the principal amount of any Revolving Loans or funded participations in Swingline Loans or Letters of Credit in respect of which such Defaulting Lender has not fully funded its appropriate share and (ii) such Revolving Loans or funded participations in Swingline Loans or Letters of Credit were made at a time when the conditions set forth in Section 7.02 were satisfied or waived, such payment shall be applied solely to pay the Revolving Loans of, and funded participations in Swingline Loans or Letters of Credit owed to, all non-Defaulting Lenders on a pro rata basis prior to being applied to the payment of any Revolving Loans of, or funded participations in Swingline Loans or Letters of Credit owed to, such Defaulting Lender until such time as all Loans and funded and unfunded participations in LC Disbursements and Swingline Loans are held by the Lenders pro rata in accordance with the Commitments without giving effect to Section 2.23(c). Any payments, prepayments or other amounts paid or payable to a Defaulting Lender that are applied (or held) to pay amounts owed by a Defaulting Lender or to

45



post cash collateral pursuant to this Section 2.23(b) shall be deemed paid to and redirected by such Defaulting Lender, and each Lender irrevocably consents hereto.
(c)      Reallocation of Applicable Percentages to Reduce Fronting Exposure; Prepayment of Swingline Loans and Cash Collateralization of Issuing Banks’ Fronting Exposure . For purposes of computing the amount of the obligation of each non-Defaulting Lender to acquire, refinance or fund participations in Letters of Credit or Swingline Loans pursuant to Section 2.05 and Section 2.22, the Applicable Percentage of each non-Defaulting Lender shall be computed without giving effect to the Commitment of such Defaulting Lender; provided that (i) each such reallocation shall be given effect only if, at the date the applicable Lender becomes a Defaulting Lender, no Default or Event of Default exists, (ii) the aggregate obligation of each non-Defaulting Lender to acquire, refinance or fund participations in Letters of Credit and Swingline Loans shall not exceed the positive difference, if any, of (A) the Commitment of that non-Defaulting Lender minus (B) the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Revolving Loans of that Lender and (iii) such reallocation does not cause any non-Defaulting Lender’s Credit Exposure to exceed its Commitment. If the foregoing reallocation cannot, or can only partially, be effected, the Borrower shall within two (2) Business Days following notice by the Administrative Agent, without prejudice to any right or remedy available to it hereunder or under law, (x) first, prepay Swingline Loans in an amount equal to the Swingline Lender’s Fronting Exposure and (y) second, cash collateralize the Issuing Banks’ Fronting Exposure in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 2.05(k).
(d)      Certain Fees . For any period during which such Lender is a Defaulting Lender, such Defaulting Lender (i) shall not be entitled to receive any Facility Fee pursuant to Section 2.04 (and the Borrower shall not be required to pay any such fee that otherwise would have been required to have been paid to such Defaulting Lender) and (ii) shall not be entitled to receive any LC Fees pursuant to Section 2.04 otherwise payable to the account of a Defaulting Lender with respect to any Letter of Credit as to which such Defaulting Lender has not provided cash collateral or other credit support arrangements satisfactory to Issuing Banks pursuant to this Section 2.23, but instead, the Borrower shall pay to the non-Defaulting Lenders the amount of such LC Fees in accordance with the upward adjustments in their respective Applicable Percentages allocable to such Letter of Credit pursuant to Section 2.23(c), with the balance of such LC Fee, if any, payable to the Issuing Bank thereof for its own account.
(e)      Defaulting Lender Cure . If the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, the Swingline Lender and the Issuing Banks agree in writing in their sole discretion that a Defaulting Lender should no longer be deemed to be a Defaulting Lender, the Administrative Agent will so notify the parties hereto, whereupon as of the effective date specified in such notice and subject to any conditions set forth therein (which may include arrangements with respect to any cash collateral), that Lender will, to the extent applicable, purchase at par that portion of outstanding Revolving Loans of the other Lenders or take such other actions as the Administrative Agent may determine to be necessary to cause the Revolving Loans and funded and unfunded participations in Letters of Credit and Swingline Loans to be held on a pro rata basis by the Lenders in accordance with their Applicable Percentages (without giving effect to Section 2.23(c)), whereupon such Lender will cease to be a Defaulting Lender; provided that no adjustments will be made retroactively with respect to fees accrued or payments made by or on behalf of the Borrower while such Lender was a Defaulting

46



Lender; and provided , further , that except to the extent otherwise expressly agreed by the affected parties, no change hereunder from Defaulting Lender to Lender will constitute a waiver or release of any claim of any party hereunder arising from such Lender’s having been a Defaulting Lender.
(f)      New Swingline Loans/Letters of Credit . So long as any Lender is a Defaulting Lender, (i) the Swingline Lender shall not be required to fund any Swingline Loans except as provided in Section 2.22(d) and (ii) no Issuing Bank shall be required to issue, extend, renew or increase any Letter of Credit except as provided in Section 2.05(k).
Section 2.24      Extension of Maturity .
(a)      Not earlier than 30 days prior to the first anniversary of the Effective Date, nor later than 30 days prior to the Maturity Date, the Borrower may (but in no event (i) on more than two occasions during the term of this Agreement, or (ii) more frequently than once in any period of twelve consecutive calendar months), upon notice to the Administrative Agent (which shall promptly notify the Lenders), request a one-year extension of the Maturity Date. Within 20 days of delivery of such notice, each Lender shall notify the Administrative Agent whether or not it consents to such extension (which consent may be given or withheld in such Lender’s sole and absolute discretion). Any Lender not responding within the above time period shall be deemed not to have consented to such extension. The Administrative Agent shall promptly notify the Borrower and the Lenders of the Lenders’ responses.
(b)      The Maturity Date shall be extended if Majority Lenders (the “ Consenting Lenders ”) have consented thereto. If so extended, the Maturity Date, as to the Consenting Lenders, shall be extended to the date which is one year after the Maturity Date then in effect, effective as of the date the Administrative Agent has received the documents required to be delivered by Section 2.24(c)(iii) (the “ Extension Effective Date ”). The Administrative Agent and the Borrower shall promptly confirm to the Lenders such extension and the Extension Effective Date.
(c)      Notwithstanding the foregoing, the extension of the Maturity Date pursuant to this Section 2.24 shall not be effective with respect to any Lender unless:
(i)      on and as of the Extension Effective Date, no event has occurred and is continuing or would result from such extension which constitutes an Event of Default or a Default;
(ii)      both before and after giving effect to such extension, the representations and warranties contained in this Agreement are true and accurate in all material respects (unless qualified by materiality or Material Adverse Change, in which case such representation and warranty is true and accurate in all respects) on and as of the Extension Effective Date as though made on and as of such date (except to the extent that such representations and warranties relate solely to an earlier date, and except that for purposes of this Section 2.24, the representations and warranties contained in Section 3.01(f) shall be deemed to refer to the most recent statements furnished pursuant to Sections 4.01(a) and (b)); and

47



(iii)      the Borrower shall have delivered to the Administrative Agent (A) copies of corporate resolutions certified by the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Borrower, or such other evidence as may be satisfactory to the Administrative Agent, demonstrating that the Borrower’s incurrence of indebtedness hereunder with a Maturity Date as extended pursuant to this Section 2.24 has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action and (B) a certificate signed by a responsible officer dated as of the Extension Effective Date certifying as to the matters set forth in clauses (i) and (ii) above.
(d)      If any Lender does not consent to the extension of the Maturity Date as provided in this Section 2.24 (a “ Declining Lender ”), the Borrower shall have the right to replace such Lender in accordance with Section 10.13(b).
(e)      The Borrower shall pay any Loans outstanding on the Maturity Date (prior to giving effect to any extension) as to any Declining Lenders, and pay any additional amounts required pursuant to Section 2.21.
Section 2.25      Alternate Rate of Interest . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 2.17 above, if the Administrative Agent has made the determination (such determination to be conclusive absent manifest error) that (i) the circumstances described in Section 2.17(a) have arisen and that such circumstances are unlikely to be temporary, (ii) the LIBO Rate is no longer a widely recognized benchmark rate for newly originated loans in the U.S. syndicated loan market in Dollars or (iii) the applicable supervisor or administrator (if any) of the LIBO Rate specified herein or any Governmental Authority having or purporting to have jurisdiction over the Administrative Agent has made a public statement identifying a specific date after which the LIBO Rate specified herein shall no longer be used for determining interest rates for loans in the U.S. syndicated loan market in Dollars, then the Administrative Agent may, to the extent practicable (as determined by the Administrative Agent to be generally in accordance with similar situations in other transactions in which it is serving as administrative agent or otherwise consistent with market practice generally) and subject to Borrower’s consent, establish a replacement interest rate (the “ Replacement Rate ”) to the LIBO Rate, in which case, the Replacement Rate shall, subject to the next two sentences, replace the LIBO Rate for all purposes under the Loan Documents unless and until (A) an event described in Section 2.17(a) or clauses (i), (ii) or (iii) above occurs with respect to the Replacement Rate or (B) the Administrative Agent (or the Majority Lenders through the Administrative Agent) notifies the Borrower that the Administrative Agent has, or the Majority Lenders have, reasonably determined that the Replacement Rate does not adequately and fairly reflect the cost to the Lenders of funding the Loans bearing interest at the Replacement Rate. In connection with the establishment and application of the Replacement Rate, this Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall be amended solely with the consent of the Administrative Agent and the Borrower, as may be necessary or appropriate, in the opinion of the Administrative Agent and the Borrower, to effect the provisions of this Section 2.25. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement or the other Loan Documents (including, without limitation, Section 10.02), such amendment shall become effective without any further action or consent of any other party to this Agreement or such other Loan Documents so long as the Administrative Agent shall not have received, within five (5) Business Days of the delivery of such amendment to the Lenders,

48



a written notice signed by Lenders constituting Majority Lenders stating that such Lenders object to such amendment (which such notice shall note with specificity the particular provisions of the amendment to which such Lenders object).
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
Section 3.01      Representations of the Borrower . The Borrower represents and warrants to the Administrative Agent, the Lenders and the Issuing Banks that:
(a)      Each of the Borrower and each Subsidiary has been duly formed and is validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its organization and is qualified to do business as a foreign entity and is in good standing in each jurisdiction of the United States in which the ownership of its properties or the conduct of its business requires such qualification and where the failure to so qualify would constitute a Material Adverse Change.
(b)      Each Loan Document has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Borrower and such Loan Document constitutes a valid and binding agreement of the Borrower, enforceable in accordance with its terms, subject to the effect of applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance, reorganization and other similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and general principals of equity (whether considered in a proceeding in equity or law). There are no actions, suits or proceedings pending or, to the knowledge of the Borrower or any Subsidiary, threatened against the Borrower or any Subsidiary which purports to affect the legality, validity or enforceability of this Agreement or any other Loan Document.
(c)      The execution, delivery and performance of each Loan Document by the Borrower will not violate or conflict with (i) the organizational documents of the Borrower or any Subsidiary, as in effect on the Effective Date or (ii) any indenture, loan agreement or other similar agreement or instrument binding on the Borrower or any Subsidiary.
(d)      The Borrower and its Subsidiaries are in compliance with all laws, rules, regulations, orders, decrees and requirements of any Governmental Authority applicable to them or their properties, except where the necessity of compliance therewith is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings or such failure to comply would not have or would not reasonably be expected to cause a Material Adverse Change. The Borrower has implemented and maintains in effect policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by the Borrower, its Subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents (acting in their capacity as an agent for the Borrower) with Anti-Corruption Laws and applicable Sanctions, and the Borrower, its Subsidiaries and their respective officers and employees and to the knowledge of the Borrower its directors and agents (acting in their capacity as an agent for the Borrower), are in compliance with Anti-Corruption Laws and applicable Sanctions in all material respects. None of (i) the Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries or, to the knowledge of the Borrower, any of their respective directors, officers or employees, or (ii) to the knowledge of the Borrower, any agent of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries (acting in its capacity as an agent for the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries) that will act in any capacity in connection with the credit facility established hereby, is a Sanctioned Person or received notice from, or made a voluntary disclosure to, any governmental authority that enforces

49



Sanctions or any Anti-Corruption Laws regarding a possible violation of Anti-Corruption Laws or Sanctions. To the knowledge of the Borrower, none of the Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries, any of their respective directors, officers or employees, or any agent of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries (acting in its capacity as an agent for the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries) that will act in any capacity in connection with the credit facility established hereby, is under administrative, civil or criminal investigation by a governmental authority that enforces Sanctions or any Anti-Corruption Laws for an alleged violation of Anti-Corruption Laws or Sanctions. No proceeds of any Loan or any Letter of Credit have been or will be used in a manner prohibited under Section 4.04(c).
(e)      On the Effective Date there are no actions, suits, proceedings or investigations pending or, to the knowledge of the Borrower, threatened against the Borrower or any Subsidiary before any Governmental Authority as to which, in the opinion of the Borrower, there is a reasonable possibility of an adverse determination and that, if adversely determined, could reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to constitute a Material Adverse Change.
(f)      The consolidated balance sheets of the Borrower and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, partners’ (or stockholders’) equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, audited by KPMG LLP, present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Borrower and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with GAAP applied on a consistent basis.
(g)      There has been no Material Adverse Change since the date of the Borrower’s most recent audited financial statements.
(h)      Neither the Borrower nor any Subsidiary is an “ investment company ” as defined in, or subject to regulation under, the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(i)      No ERISA Event has occurred or is reasonably expected to occur that, when taken together with all other such ERISA Events for which liability is reasonably expected to occur, could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change. The present value of all accumulated benefit obligations of all underfunded Plans subject to Title IV of ERISA (based on the assumptions used for purposes of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87 or any successor thereto) did not, as of the date of the most recent financial statements reflecting such amounts, exceed the fair market value of the assets of all such underfunded Plans by an amount that could reasonably be expected to be a Material Adverse Change.
(j)      Neither the Information Memorandum nor any of the other reports, financial statements, certificates or other information furnished by or on behalf of the Borrower to the Agents or any Lender in connection with the negotiation of this Agreement or delivered hereunder (as modified or supplemented by other information so furnished), taken as a whole, contains any material misstatement of fact or omits to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; provided that, with respect to projected financial information, the Borrower represents only that such information was

50



prepared in good faith based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable at the time, it being understood that projections by their nature are inherently uncertain and no assurances are being given that the results reflected in the projected financial information will be achieved.
(k)      The General Partner has filed all United States Federal income tax returns and all other material tax returns and reports required to be filed (or obtained extensions with respect thereto) and has paid all taxes required to have been paid by it, except (i) taxes the validity of which is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings, and with respect to which the General Partner, to the extent required by GAAP, has set aside on its books adequate reserves or (ii) to the extent the failure to do so (individually or collectively) would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change.
(l)      Except as would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change, each of the real properties owned or leased by the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries and all their operations at such properties are in compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws and neither the Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any notice regarding violation of any Environmental Law with respect to the properties or the businesses operated by the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries.
(m)      No Event of Default has occurred and is continuing.
(n)      The Borrower and its Subsidiaries are not engaged principally, or as one of its or their important activities, in the business of extending credit for the purpose, whether immediate, incidental or ultimate, of buying or carrying margin stock (within the meaning of the Margin Regulations).
(o)      The Borrower and each of its Subsidiaries is and, after the consummation of the Transactions, will be “solvent” within the meaning of such term under the United States Bankruptcy Code.

ARTICLE IV
AFFIRMATIVE COVENANTS
Until all Commitments have expired or been terminated and the principal of and interest on each Loan and all fees payable hereunder shall have been paid in full, all Letters of Credit shall have expired or terminated, and all LC Disbursements shall have been reimbursed, the Borrower covenants and agrees with the Lenders that:
Section 4.01      Financial Statements and Other Information . The Borrower will furnish to the Administrative Agent and each Lender:
(a)      Within the period required by applicable law (and concurrently with the filing thereof with the Commission), copies of the annual reports, information, documents and other reports (or copies of such portions of any of the foregoing as the Commission may from time to

51



time by rules and regulations prescribe) which the Borrower may be required to file with the Commission pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; or, if the Borrower is not required to file information, documents or reports pursuant to either of said Sections, then such of the supplementary and periodic information, documents and reports which may be required pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in respect of a security listed and registered on a national securities exchange as may be prescribed from time to time in such rules and regulations; provided, however , that the Borrower shall be deemed to have furnished the information required by this Section 4.01(a) if it shall have timely made the same available on “EDGAR” on the worldwide web and complied with Section 4.01(e) in respect thereof.
(b)      Within sixty (60) days after the close of each of the first three quarters of each fiscal year of the Borrower, a statement by a responsible officer of the Borrower calculating compliance or non-compliance, as the case may be, with Section 5.01 as of the close of such period and stating whether to the knowledge of the Borrower an event has occurred during such period and is continuing which constitutes an Event of Default or a Default, and, if so, stating the facts with respect thereto.
(c)      Within one hundred twenty (120) days after the close of each fiscal year of the Borrower, a statement by a responsible officer of the Borrower calculating compliance or non-compliance, as the case may be, with Section 5.01 as of the close of such period and stating whether to the knowledge of the Borrower an event has occurred during such period and is continuing which constitutes an Event of Default or a Default, and, if so, stating the facts with respect thereto.
(d)      Such other information respecting the financial condition or operations of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries as the Administrative Agent or any Lender may from time to time reasonably request.
(e)      Information required to be delivered pursuant to Section 4.01(a) above shall be deemed to have been delivered on the date on which the Borrower provides notice to the Administrative Agent that such information has been posted on EDGAR.
Section 4.02      Notices of Material Events . The Borrower will furnish to the Administrative Agent and each Lender prompt written notice of the following:
(a)      the occurrence of any Event of Default;
(b)      the filing or commencement of any action, suit or proceeding by or before any arbitrator or Governmental Authority against or affecting the Borrower that if adversely determined, could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change; and
(c)      any other development that results in, or could reasonably be expected to result in, a Material Adverse Change.
Each notice delivered under this Section 4.02 shall be accompanied by a statement of a Financial Officer or other executive officer of the Borrower setting forth the details of the event or development requiring such notice and any action taken with respect thereto.

52



Section 4.03      Compliance with Laws . The Borrower will, and will cause each of the Subsidiaries to, comply with all laws, rules, regulations and orders of any Governmental Authority (including Anti-Corruption Laws and Sanctions) applicable to it or its property, except where the necessity of compliance therewith is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings or where the failure to do so, individually or in the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change. The Borrower will maintain in effect and enforce policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by the Borrower, its Subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents (acting in their capacity as agents for the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries) with Anti-Corruption Laws and applicable Sanctions.
Section 4.04      Use of Proceeds .
(a)      The proceeds of the Loans and the Letters of Credit shall be used to refinance outstanding Indebtedness under the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement, to repay Swingline Loans and to provide working capital and to provide funding in connection with capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes.
(b)      No part of the proceeds of any Loan or Letter of Credit will be used for any purpose which violates the Margin Regulations.
(c)      The Borrower will not request any Loan or Letter of Credit, and the Borrower shall not use, and shall ensure that its Subsidiaries (and shall take reasonable measures to ensure that its or their respective directors, officers, employees and agents (acting in their capacity as agents for the Borrower)) shall not use, the proceeds of any Loan or Letter of Credit (i) in furtherance of an offer, payment, promise to pay, or authorization of the payment or giving of money, or anything else of value, to any Person in violation of any Anti-Corruption Laws or (ii) for the purpose of funding, financing or facilitating any activities, business or transaction of or with any Sanctioned Person, or in any Sanctioned Country.
Section 4.05      Maintenance of Property; Insurance .
(a)      The Borrower will keep, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries to keep, all property useful and necessary in its business in good working order and condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, except where the failure to do so could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change.
(b)      The Borrower will at all times maintain, with financially sound and reputable insurers, insurance of the kinds, covering the risks and in the relative proportionate amounts (including as to self-insurance) customarily carried by companies engaged in the same or similar business and similarly situated; provided that the Borrower shall not be required to maintain insurance against risks or in amounts no longer economically available on a de novo or renewal basis, as applicable, to other companies engaged in the same or similar business and similarly situated.
Section 4.06      Books and Records; Inspections . The Borrower will keep, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries to keep, complete and accurate books and records of its transactions in

53



accordance with good accounting practices on the basis of GAAP (including the establishment and maintenance of appropriate reserves). The Borrower will, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries to, permit any representatives designated by the Administrative Agent, upon reasonable prior notice, to visit and inspect its properties, to examine and make extracts from its books and records, and to discuss its affairs, finances and condition with its officers and independent accountants, all at such reasonable times and as often as reasonably requested. In the absence of an Event of Default and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 10.03, the Borrower shall not be required to pay for more than one such visit in any year.
Section 4.07      Payment of Obligations . The Borrower will, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries to, pay its obligations, including material Tax liabilities of the Borrower and all of its Subsidiaries before the same shall become delinquent or in default, except where (i) (A) the validity or amount thereof is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings, and (B) the Borrower or such Subsidiary has set aside on its books adequate reserves with respect thereto in accordance with GAAP or (ii) the failure to make payment could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change.
Section 4.08      Material Contracts . The Borrower will comply, and will cause its Subsidiaries to comply, with all contracts necessary for the ongoing operation and business of the Borrower or such Subsidiary in the ordinary course, except where the failure to comply would not have or would not reasonably be expected to cause a Material Adverse Change.
Section 4.09      EEA Financial Institution . The Borrower is not an EEA Financial Institution.

54



ARTICLE V
FINANCIAL COVENANT
Until all Commitments have expired or been terminated and the principal of and interest on each Loan and all fees payable hereunder shall have been paid in full, all Letters of Credit shall have expired or terminated, and all LC Disbursements shall have been reimbursed, the Borrower covenants and agrees with the Lenders that:
Section 5.01      Consolidated Leverage Ratio . The Consolidated Leverage Ratio, as at the end of each fiscal quarter of the Borrower (beginning with the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2017), shall be less than or equal to 5.00 to 1.00, except with respect to any fiscal quarter ending in the 270-day period immediately following a Permitted Acquisition, in which case the Consolidated Leverage Ratio shall be less than or equal to 5.50 to 1.00.
ARTICLE VI
NEGATIVE COVENANTS
Until all Commitments have expired or been terminated and the principal of and interest on each Loan and all fees payable hereunder shall have been paid in full, all Letters of Credit shall have expired or terminated, and all LC Disbursements shall have been reimbursed, the Borrower covenants and agrees with the Lenders that:
Section 6.01      Nature of Business . The Borrower will not, nor will it permit its Subsidiaries to (whether now owned or acquired or formed subsequent to the Effective Date), materially alter the character of its or their business on a consolidated basis from the midstream energy business.
Section 6.02      Liens . The Borrower will not create, assume or suffer to exist any Lien on any asset now owned or hereafter acquired by it or any of its Subsidiaries, except for the following:
(a)      Liens for taxes, assessments or other governmental or quasi-governmental charges or levies not yet due or which are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and with respect to which adequate reserves or other appropriate provisions are being maintained in accordance with GAAP;
(b)      statutory Liens of landlords and Liens of carriers, warehousemen, mechanics, materialmen and interest owners of oil and gas production and other Liens imposed by law, created in the ordinary course of business and for amounts not past due for more than 60 days or which are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings which are sufficient to prevent imminent foreclosure of such Liens, are promptly instituted and diligently conducted and with respect to which adequate reserves or other appropriate provisions are being maintained in accordance with GAAP;
(c)      Liens incurred or deposits made in the ordinary course of business (including, without limitation, surety bonds and appeal bonds) in connection with workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance and other types of social security benefits or to secure the performance of tenders, bids, leases, contracts (other than for the repayment of Indebtedness), statutory

55



obligations and other similar obligations or arising as a result of progress payments under government contracts;
(d)      easements (including, without limitation, reciprocal easement agreements and utility agreements), rights of way, covenants, consents, reservations, encroachments, variations and other restrictions, charges or encumbrances (whether or not recorded) affecting the use of real property;
(e)      Liens with respect to judgments and attachments which do not result in an Event of Default;
(f)      Liens created pursuant to construction, operating and maintenance agreements, transportation agreements and other similar agreements and related documents entered into in the ordinary course of business;
(g)      Liens, deposits or pledges to secure the performance of bids, tenders, contracts (other than contracts for the payment of money), leases permitted under the terms of this Agreement (other than Capital Leases), public or statutory obligations, surety, stay, appeal, indemnity, performance or other obligations arising in the ordinary course of business;
(h)      Liens securing obligations under Capital Leases; provided that (i) any such Liens attach only to the property which is the subject of such Capital Lease, (ii) such Liens secure only the Indebtedness comprised of such Capital Lease and (iii) the aggregate Indebtedness being secured by such Liens does not exceed at any one time calculated as of the date such Capital Lease is created ten percent 10% of Consolidated Net Tangible Assets;
(i)      Liens (1) securing Acquired Indebtedness and (2) on any asset securing Indebtedness incurred or assumed for the purpose of financing all or any part of the cost of acquiring such asset; provided that, in the case of clause (2), such Lien attaches to such asset concurrently with or within 365 days after the acquisition thereof;
(j)      rights of first refusal entered into in the ordinary course of business;
(k)      Liens consisting of any (i) rights reserved to or vested in any municipality or governmental, statutory or public authority to control or regulate any property of the Borrower or any Subsidiary or to use such property, (ii) obligations or duties to any municipality or public authority with respect to any franchise, grant, license, lease or permit and the rights reserved or vested in any Governmental Authority or public utility to terminate any such franchise, grant, license, lease or permit or to condemn or expropriate any property, or (iii) zoning laws, ordinances or municipal regulations;
(l)      Liens on deposits required by any Person with whom the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries enters into forward contracts, futures contracts, swap agreements (including interest rate swap agreements) or other commodities contracts in the ordinary course of business;

56



(m)      Liens arising out of the refinancing, extension, renewal or refunding of any Indebtedness secured by any Lien permitted by this Section 6.02; provided that the principal amount of such Indebtedness is not increased (other than to provide for the payment of any underwriting discounts and fees related to any refinancing Indebtedness as well as any premiums owed on and accrued and unpaid interest related to the original Indebtedness) and is not secured by any additional assets;
(n)      Liens securing other obligations in an amount not to exceed, in the aggregate, at any one time, calculated as of the date such Lien is incurred, 15% of Consolidated Net Tangible Assets (and, for purposes of this Section 6.02(n), with respect to any such secured Indebtedness of a Joint Venture of the Borrower with no recourse to the Borrower or any Wholly Owned Subsidiary thereof, no portion of such Indebtedness shall be included in calculating compliance herewith), provided that, if the amount of such other obligations secured by Liens exceeds the amount specified above, then at the time such Liens to secure such other obligations are granted, the Loans, LC Exposure and other obligations under this Agreement and other Loan Documents shall be secured equally and ratably with such other obligations; and
(o)      Liens pursuant to any Loan Document (including any documents entered into in order to cash collateralize any Fronting Exposure).
Section 6.03      Transactions with Affiliates . The Borrower will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, pay any funds to or for the account of, make any investment in, lease, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of any assets, tangible or intangible, to, or participate in, or effect, any transaction with, any officer, director, employee or Affiliate (other than the Borrower or one of its Subsidiaries) unless such transaction between the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on the one hand and any officer, director, employee or Affiliate (other than the Borrower or one of its Subsidiaries) on the other hand, shall be on terms that are fair and reasonable to the Borrower or such Subsidiary; provided that the foregoing provisions of this Section 6.03 shall not (a) prohibit the Borrower or any Subsidiary from declaring or paying any lawful dividend or distribution otherwise permitted hereunder, (b) prohibit the Borrower or any Subsidiary from providing credit support for its Subsidiaries as it deems appropriate in the ordinary course of business, (c) prohibit the Borrower or any Subsidiary from engaging in a transaction or transactions on terms that are not fair and reasonable to such Person, provided that such transaction or transactions occurs within a related series of transactions, which, in the aggregate, are fair and reasonable to such Person, (d) prohibit the Borrower or any Subsidiary from engaging in non-material transactions with any Affiliate other than the Borrower or any Subsidiary that are not fair and reasonable to such Person, but are in the ordinary course of such Person’s business, so long as, in each case, after giving effect thereto, no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing, (e) prohibit the Borrower or any Subsidiary from entering into or performing its obligations under any of the agreements listed on Schedule II or any amendments, modifications or replacements thereto that, in the aggregate, are not materially adverse to the Borrower or any Subsidiary party thereto, or (f) prohibit the Borrower or any Subsidiary from compensating its employees and officers in the ordinary course of business; provided, further , that a finding by the Board of Directors of General Partner that a transaction or series of transactions is on terms which are fair and reasonable to the Borrower or any Subsidiary shall be dispositive.

57



Section 6.04      Indebtedness . The Borrower will not create, incur or assume any Indebtedness (including Acquired Indebtedness) unless at the time of the incurrence thereof and after giving effect thereto no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing. The Borrower will not permit its Subsidiaries to create, incur or assume any Indebtedness, except (i) Indebtedness in an aggregate amount not to exceed, at any one time outstanding as of the date such Indebtedness is incurred, the lesser of (A) 20% of Consolidated Net Tangible Assets less, if the Loans, LC Exposure and other obligations under this Agreement have not been secured as contemplated under Section 6.02(n), the amount of Indebtedness secured under Section 6.02(n) and (B) 15% of Consolidated Net Tangible Assets and (ii) Acquired Indebtedness.
Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, the Borrower and its Subsidiaries may, at any time, create, incur or assume the following Indebtedness:
(a)      Indebtedness under the Loan Documents;
(b)      Indebtedness owed to the Borrower or to another Subsidiary;
(c)      obligations (contingent or otherwise) of the Borrower or any Subsidiary existing or arising under hedging agreements or other derivative products; provided that, such obligations are (or were) entered into by such Person in the ordinary course of business for the purpose of directly mitigating risks associated with liabilities, commitments, investments, assets, or property held or reasonably anticipated by such Person, or changes in the value of securities issued by such Person, and not for purposes of speculation or taking a “market view”;
(d)      current liabilities of the Borrower or its Subsidiaries incurred in the ordinary course of business but not incurred through (i) the borrowing of money or (ii) the obtaining of credit except for credit on an open account basis customarily extended and in fact extended in connection with normal purchases of goods and services;
(e)      guarantees of Extensions of Credit hereunder; and
(f)      Indebtedness in respect of taxes, assessments, governmental charges or levies and claims for labor, materials and supplies to the extent that payment therefor shall not at the time be required to be made in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
Section 6.05      Restricted Payments . The Borrower will not, nor will it permit its Subsidiaries to, declare or make, directly or indirectly, any Restricted Payment, or incur any obligation (contingent or otherwise) to do so, unless no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing under Sections 8.01(a), (e), (f) or (g) or under Section 8.01(d) as a result of a breach of Section 5.01, or in any such case would result therefrom.
Section 6.06      [Reserved] .
Section 6.07      Limitations on Sales and Leasebacks . The Borrower will not, and will not permit any Subsidiary to, enter into any arrangement with any bank, insurance company or other lender or investor (not including the Borrower or any Subsidiary) or to which any such lender or

58



investor is a party, providing for the leasing by the Borrower or a Subsidiary for a period, including renewals, in excess of three years, of any property which has been or is to be sold or transferred more than one hundred eighty (180) days after the completion of construction and commencement of full operation thereof, by the Borrower or any Subsidiary to such lender or investor or to any Person to whom funds have been or are to be advanced by such lender or investor on the security of such property unless the Borrower, within one hundred eighty (180) days after the sale or transfer shall have been made by the Borrower or by a Subsidiary, applies an amount equal to the greater of (i) the net proceeds of the sale of the property sold and leased back pursuant to such arrangement or (ii) the net amount (after deducting applicable reserves) at which such property is carried on the books of the Borrower or such Subsidiary at the time of entering into such arrangement, to the repayment of outstanding Indebtedness of the Borrower.
Section 6.08      Fundamental Changes . The Borrower shall not consolidate with or merge into any other Person or convey, transfer or lease its properties and assets substantially as an entirety to any Person unless:
(a)      (i) in the case of a merger or amalgamation, the Borrower is the surviving entity; or (ii) the Person formed by such consolidation or into which the Borrower is merged or the Person which acquires by conveyance or transfer, or which leases, the properties and assets of the Borrower substantially as an entirety shall be a corporation, partnership or trust, shall be organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, any State thereof or the District of Columbia, shall (1) have unsecured non-credit enhanced publicly held indebtedness with an Investment Grade Rating, and (2) expressly assume, by an agreement supplemental hereto, executed and delivered to the Administrative Agent, in form reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent, the obligations of the Borrower hereunder, including the due and punctual payment of the principal of and interest on all the Revolving Loans and the performance of every covenant of this Agreement on the part of the Borrower to be performed or observed; and
(b)      immediately after giving effect to such transaction, no Event of Default or Default shall have occurred and be continuing.
ARTICLE VII
CONDITIONS OF LENDING
Section 7.01      Conditions Precedent to Effectiveness . The obligations of the Lenders and the Issuing Banks to make the initial Extension of Credit as contemplated by Section 10.16 shall not become effective until the date on which each of the following conditions is satisfied (or waived in accordance with Section 10.02):
(a)      Appropriate Notes are issued payable to such Lender, if requested;
(b)      The Administrative Agent (or its counsel) shall have received from each party hereto either (1) a counterpart of this Agreement signed on behalf of such party, or (2) written evidence satisfactory to the Administrative Agent (which may include facsimile transmission of a signed signature page of this Agreement) that such party has signed a counterpart of this Agreement;

59



(c)      The Administrative Agent and the Lenders shall have received all fees and other amounts due and payable on the Effective Date, including, to the extent invoiced at least one Business Day prior to the Effective Date (unless the Borrower otherwise consents), reimbursement or payment of all out-of-pocket expenses required to be reimbursed or paid by the Borrower hereunder;
(d)      The Arrangers shall have received (i) satisfactory audited consolidated financial statements of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for the three most recent fiscal years ended prior to the Effective Date as to which such financial statements are available, (ii) satisfactory unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Borrower for each fiscal quarterly period ended subsequent to the date of the latest financial statements delivered pursuant to clause (i) of this paragraph as to which such financial statements are available, and (iii) the projections prepared by the Borrower set forth in the Information Memorandum;
(e)      The Administrative Agent (or its counsel) shall have received certified copies of the resolutions of the Board of Directors of the General Partner, as general partner of and on behalf of the Borrower, authorizing the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the execution, issuance, delivery and performance of its Notes;
(f)      The Administrative Agent (or its counsel) shall have received a certificate of a responsible officer of the General Partner, as general partner and on behalf of the Borrower, to the effect that:
(i)      the representations and warranties contained in ARTICLE III are true and accurate in all material respects (unless qualified by materiality or Material Adverse Change, in which case such representation and warranty is true and accurate in all respects) on and as of the date of the making of each such Loan as though made on and as of such date (except to the extent that such representations and warranties relate solely to an earlier date); and
(ii)      no event has occurred and is continuing or would result from the proposed Borrowing, which constitutes an Event of Default or a Default.
(g)      The Administrative Agent (or its counsel) shall have received an opinion:
(i)      of Vinson & Elkins, LLP, special counsel to the Borrower, in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent; and
(ii)      of an associate general counsel, deputy general counsel or the general counsel of the Borrower or Anadarko, in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent;
(h)      There shall not have occurred a Material Adverse Change;
(i)      The Lenders shall have received such documents and other instruments as are customary for transactions of this type or as they or their counsel may reasonably request;

60



(j)      The Administrative Agent and the Lenders shall have received all documentation and other information required under applicable “know-your-customer” and anti-money laundering rules and regulations, including but not restricted to the USA Patriot Act, that was requested by the Administrative Agent or any Lender to ensure compliance therewith; and
(k)      The Arrangers shall not be aware of any material information or other matter that is inconsistent in a material and adverse manner with any previous due diligence, information or matter (including any financial information and projections previously delivered to the Arrangers).
Section 7.02      Conditions Precedent to Loans . The obligation of each Lender to make any Loan, and each Issuing Bank to issue, amend, renew or extend any Letter of Credit, is subject to the further conditions precedent that, on the relevant Borrowing Date, Section 7.01(f)(i) and Section 7.01(f)(ii) shall be true with respect to such Loan, issuance, amendment, renewal or extension and such Borrowing, issuance, amendment, renewal or extension, as applicable, shall be deemed to constitute a certification by the Borrower that such statements are true.
ARTICLE VIII
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
Section 8.01      Events of Default . If one or more of the following events of default (“ Events of Default ”) shall occur and be continuing:
(a)      the Borrower shall default in any payment of principal of any Loan or any reimbursement obligation in respect of any LC Disbursement when and as the same shall become due and payable, or the Borrower shall default in any payment of interest on any Loan, or in the payment of any fees or other amounts, when and as the same shall become due and payable, and such default shall continue for a period of five (5) Business Days;
(b)      any representation or warranty made by the Borrower herein shall prove to have been incorrect in any material respect when made;
(c)      the Borrower shall fail to observe or perform any covenant, condition or agreement contained in Section 4.02(a) or Section 4.04(b) applicable to it or ARTICLE VI required to be observed or performed by the Borrower;
(d)      the Borrower shall default in the performance of any other term, condition, covenant or agreement contained in this Agreement (except as set forth in Section 8.01(a) or Section 8.01(c)) required to be performed by it and such default shall continue unremedied for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice thereof, specifying such default and requiring it to be remedied, shall have been received by the Borrower from any Lender;
(e)      the Borrower or any Material Subsidiary shall (i) default in the payment of principal of any Indebtedness in an aggregate principal amount in excess of $50,000,000 (other than the Loans) beyond the period of grace, if any, provided in the instrument or agreement under which such Indebtedness was created as and when the same shall become due and payable whether

61



at maturity, upon redemption, by declaration or otherwise, or (ii) default in the observance or performance of any other agreement or condition relating to any such Indebtedness or contained in any instrument or agreement evidencing, securing or relating thereto, and such default shall have resulted in such Indebtedness being declared due and payable prior to its stated maturity;
(f)      the Borrower or any Material Subsidiary shall (i) apply for or consent to the appointment of, or the taking of possession by, a receiver, custodian, trustee or liquidator of itself or any material part of its property, (ii) admit in writing its inability to pay its debts as such debts become due, (iii) make a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors, (iv) commence a voluntary case under any Debtor Relief Law, (v) file a petition seeking to take advantage of any other law providing for similar relief of debtors, or (vi) consent or acquiesce in writing to any petition duly filed against it in any involuntary case under any Debtor Relief Law;
(g)      a proceeding or case shall be commenced, without the application or consent of the Borrower or any Material Subsidiary, in any court of competent jurisdiction seeking (i) its liquidation, reorganization, dissolution or winding up, or the composition or readjustment of its debts, (ii) the appointment of a trustee, receiver, custodian, liquidator or the like of it or of its assets, or (iii) similar relief in respect of it, under any law providing for the relief of debtors, and such proceeding or case shall continue undismissed, or unstayed and in effect, for a period of sixty (60) days (or such longer period, so long as the Borrower or any such Material Subsidiary shall be taking such action in good faith as shall be reasonably necessary to obtain the timely dismissal or stay of such proceeding or case); or an order for relief shall be entered in an involuntary case under any applicable Debtor Relief Law, against the Borrower or any such Subsidiary;
(h)      there is entered against the Borrower or any Material Subsidiary one or more final non-appealable judgments for the payment of money in an aggregate amount in excess of $50,000,000 (net of insurance coverage which is reasonably expected to be paid by the insurer), and the same shall remain undischarged for a period of sixty (60) consecutive days during which execution shall not be effectively stayed, or any action shall be legally taken by a judgment creditor to attach or levy upon any assets of the Borrower or any Material Subsidiary to enforce any such judgment;
(i)      the Loan Documents after delivery thereof shall for any reason, except to the extent permitted by the terms thereof, cease to be in full force and effect and valid, binding and enforceable in accordance with their terms against the Borrower or shall be repudiated by any of them, or cease to create a valid and perfected Lien of the priority required thereby on any of the collateral purported to be covered thereby, except to the extent permitted by the terms of this Agreement, or the Borrower or any Subsidiary or any of their Affiliates shall so state in writing.
(j)      an ERISA Event shall have occurred that, when taken together with all other ERISA Events that have occurred, could reasonably be expected to result in a liability which would have a Material Adverse Change; or
(k)      any Change of Control shall occur,

62



then and in each and every case the Majority Lenders, by notice in writing to the Borrower, may terminate the Commitments of the Lenders hereunder and/or declare the unpaid balance of the Loans and any other amounts payable hereunder to be forthwith due and payable and thereupon such balance shall become so due and payable without presentation, protest or further demand or notice of any kind, all of which are hereby expressly waived; provided that in the case of Section 8.01(f) or (g) above, the Commitments of the Lenders hereunder shall automatically terminate and the Loans and any other amounts payable hereunder shall forthwith be due and payable.
ARTICLE IX
THE AGENTS
Section 9.01      Appointment and Authority . Each of the Lenders and the Issuing Banks hereby irrevocably appoints Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to act on its behalf as the Administrative Agent hereunder and under the other Loan Documents and authorizes the Administrative Agent to take such actions on its behalf and to exercise such powers as are delegated to the Administrative Agent by the terms hereof or thereof, together with such actions and powers as are reasonably incidental thereto. The provisions of this Article are solely for the benefit of the Administrative Agent, the Lenders and the Issuing Banks, and the Borrower shall not have rights as a third-party beneficiary of any of such provisions. It is understood and agreed that the use of the term “agent” herein or in any other Loan Documents (or any other similar term) with reference to the Administrative Agent is not intended to connote any fiduciary or other implied (or express) obligations arising under agency doctrine of any applicable law. Instead such term is used as a matter of market custom, and is intended to create or reflect only an administrative relationship between contracting parties.
Section 9.02      Exculpatory Provisions .
(a)      The Administrative Agent shall not have any duties or obligations except those expressly set forth herein and in the other Loan Documents, and its duties hereunder shall be administrative in nature. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Administrative Agent:
(i)      shall not be subject to any fiduciary or other implied duties, regardless of whether a Default has occurred and is continuing;
(ii)      shall not have any duty to take any discretionary action or exercise any discretionary powers, except discretionary rights and powers expressly contemplated hereby or by the other Loan Documents that the Administrative Agent is required to exercise as directed in writing by the Majority Lenders (or such other number or percentage of the Lenders as shall be expressly provided for herein or in the other Loan Documents); provided that the Administrative Agent shall not be required to take any action that, in its opinion or the opinion of its counsel, may expose the Administrative Agent to liability or that is contrary to any Loan Document or applicable law, including for the avoidance of doubt any action that may be in violation of the automatic stay under any Debtor Relief Law or that may effect a forfeiture, modification or termination of property of a Defaulting Lender in violation of any Debtor Relief Law; and

63



(iii)      shall not, except as expressly set forth herein and in the other Loan Documents, have any duty to disclose, and shall not be liable for the failure to disclose, any information relating to the Borrower or any of its Affiliates that is communicated to or obtained by the Person serving as the Administrative Agent or any of its Affiliates in any capacity.
(b)      The Administrative Agent shall not be liable for any action taken or not taken by it (i) with the consent or at the request of the Majority Lenders (or such other number or percentage of the Lenders as shall be necessary, or as the Administrative Agent shall believe in good faith shall be necessary, under the circumstances as provided in Sections 10.02 and 8.01), or (ii) in the absence of its own gross negligence or willful misconduct as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction by final and nonappealable judgment. The Administrative Agent shall be deemed not to have knowledge of any Default unless and until notice describing such Default is given to the Administrative Agent in writing by the Borrower, a Lender or an Issuing Bank.
(c)      The Administrative Agent shall not be responsible for or have any duty to ascertain or inquire into (i) any statement, warranty or representation made in or in connection with this Agreement or any other Loan Document, (ii) the contents of any certificate, report or other document delivered hereunder or thereunder or in connection herewith or therewith, (iii) the performance or observance of any of the covenants, agreements or other terms or conditions set forth herein or therein or the occurrence of any Default, (iv) the validity, enforceability, effectiveness or genuineness of this Agreement, any other Loan Document or any other agreement, instrument or document, or (v) the satisfaction of any condition set forth in ARTICLE VII or elsewhere herein, other than to confirm receipt of items expressly required to be delivered to the Administrative Agent.
Section 9.03      Reliance by Administrative Agent . The Administrative Agent shall be entitled to rely upon, and shall not incur any liability for relying upon, any notice, request, certificate, consent, statement, instrument, document or other writing (including any electronic message, Internet or intranet website posting or other distribution) believed by it to be genuine and to have been signed, sent or otherwise authenticated by the proper Person. The Administrative Agent also may rely upon any statement made to it orally or by telephone and believed by it to have been made by the proper Person, and shall not incur any liability for relying thereon. In determining compliance with any condition hereunder to the making of a Loan, or the issuance, extension, renewal or increase of a Letter of Credit, that by its terms must be fulfilled to the satisfaction of a Lender or an Issuing Bank, the Administrative Agent may presume that such condition is satisfactory to such Lender or Issuing Bank unless the Administrative Agent shall have received notice to the contrary from such Lender or Issuing Bank prior to the making of such Loan or the issuance of such Letter of Credit. The Administrative Agent may consult with legal counsel (who may be counsel for the Borrower), independent accountants and other experts selected by it, and shall not be liable for any action taken or not taken by it in accordance with the advice of any such counsel, accountants or experts. The Administrative Agent may deem and treat the payee of any Note as the owner thereof for all purposes hereof unless and until a notice of the assignment or transfer thereof satisfactory to the Administrative Agent signed by such payee shall have been filed with the Administrative Agent.

64



Section 9.04      Delegation of Duties . The Administrative Agent may perform any and all of its duties and exercise its rights and powers hereunder or under any other Loan Document by or through any one or more sub agents appointed by the Administrative Agent. The Administrative Agent and any such sub agent may perform any and all of its duties and exercise its rights and powers by or through their respective Related Parties. The exculpatory provisions of this Article shall apply to any such sub agent and to the Related Parties of the Administrative Agent and any such sub agent, and shall apply to their respective activities in connection with the syndication of the credit facilities provided for herein as well as activities as Administrative Agent. The Administrative Agent shall not be responsible for the negligence or misconduct of any sub-agents except to the extent that a court of competent jurisdiction determines in a final and nonappealable judgment that the Administrative Agent acted with gross negligence or willful misconduct in the selection of such sub agents.
Section 9.05      Right to Indemnity . The Administrative Agent shall be fully justified in failing or refusing to take any action hereunder or under any agreement executed and delivered pursuant to the terms hereof unless it shall first be indemnified (upon requesting such indemnification) to its satisfaction by the Lenders against any and all liability and expense which it may incur by reason of taking or continuing to take any such action. The Lenders agree to indemnify the Administrative Agent, to the extent not reimbursed by the Borrower, under this Agreement, ratably in accordance with the aggregate Principal Amount of the Loans made by them (or, if no Loans are outstanding, ratably in accordance with their respective Commitments), for any and all liabilities, obligations, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements of any kind and nature whatsoever which may be imposed on, incurred by or asserted against the Administrative Agent as agent in any way relating to or arising out of this Agreement, the Notes or any other documents contemplated by or referred to herein or the Transactions (including the costs and expenses which the Borrower is obligated to pay under this Agreement but excluding, unless an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, normal administrative costs and expenses incident to the performance of its agency duties hereunder) or the enforcement of any of the terms hereof or thereof or of any such other documents; provided no such liability, obligation, damage, penalty, action, judgment, suit, cost, expense or disbursement results from the Administrative Agent’s gross negligence or willful misconduct; provided, however , that, in the event the Administrative Agent receives indemnification from the Lenders hereunder with respect to costs and expenses which the Borrower is obligated to pay under this Agreement, the Administrative Agent shall remit to the Lenders the amount of such costs and expenses to the extent subsequently paid by the Borrower, such remittance to be in accordance with the proportionate amount of the indemnification made by each respective Lender.
Section 9.06      Rights as a Lender The Person serving as the Administrative Agent hereunder shall have the same rights and powers in its capacity as a Lender as any other Lender and may exercise the same as though it were not the Administrative Agent, and the term “Lender” or “Lenders” shall, unless otherwise expressly indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, include the Person serving as the Administrative Agent hereunder in its individual capacity. Such Person and its Affiliates may accept deposits from, lend money to, own securities of, act as the financial advisor or in any other advisory capacity for, and generally engage in any kind of business

65



with, the Borrower or any Subsidiary or other Affiliate thereof as if such Person were not the Administrative Agent hereunder and without any duty to account therefor to the Lenders.
Section 9.07      Non-Reliance on Administrative Agent and Other Lenders . Each Lender and Issuing Bank acknowledges that it has, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender or any of their Related Parties and based on such documents and information as it has deemed appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Agreement. Each Lender and Issuing Bank also acknowledges that it will, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender or any of their Related Parties and based on such documents and information as it shall from time to time deem appropriate, continue to make its own decisions in taking or not taking action under or based upon this Agreement, any other Loan Document or any related agreement or any document furnished hereunder or thereunder. The Administrative Agent shall not be required to keep itself informed as to the performance or observance by the Borrower of this Agreement or any other document referred to or provided for herein or therein or to inspect the properties or books of the Borrower. Except for notices, reports and other documents expressly required to be furnished to the Lenders by the Administrative Agent hereunder, the Administrative Agent shall have no duty or responsibility to provide any Lender with any credit or other information concerning the affairs, financial condition or business of the Borrower or which may at any time come into possession of any Agent or any of their respective Affiliates.
Section 9.08      Events of Default . If the Administrative Agent receives actual knowledge of an Event of Default hereunder, such Agent shall promptly inform the Lenders thereof. The Administrative Agent shall not be deemed to have actual knowledge of an Event of Default hereunder until it shall have received a written notice from the Borrower or any Lender referring to this Agreement, describing such Event of Default and stating that such notice is a “Notice of Default.”
Section 9.09      Resignation of Administrative Agent .
(a)      The Administrative Agent may at any time give notice of its resignation to the Lenders, the Issuing Banks and the Borrower. Upon receipt of any such notice of resignation, the Majority Lenders shall have the right, in consultation with the Borrower, to appoint a successor, which shall be a bank with an office in New York, New York, or an Affiliate of any such bank with an office in New York, New York. If no such successor shall have been so appointed by the Majority Lenders and shall have accepted such appointment within 30 days after the retiring Administrative Agent gives notice of its resignation (or such earlier day as shall be agreed by the Majority Lenders) (the “ Resignation Effective Date ”), then the retiring Administrative Agent may (but shall not be obligated to), on behalf of the Lenders and the Issuing Banks, appoint a successor Administrative Agent meeting the qualifications set forth above. Whether or not a successor has been appointed, such resignation shall become effective in accordance with such notice on the Resignation Effective Date.
(b)      With effect from the Resignation Effective Date (1) the retiring Administrative Agent shall be discharged from its duties and obligations hereunder and under the other Loan Documents and (2) except for any indemnity payments owed to the retiring Administrative Agent, all payments, communications and determinations provided to be made by,

66



to or through the Administrative Agent shall instead be made by or to each Lender and Issuing Bank directly, until such time, if any, as the Majority Lenders, in consultation with the Borrower, appoint a successor Administrative Agent as provided for above. Upon the acceptance of a successor’s appointment as the Administrative Agent hereunder, such successor shall succeed to and become vested with all of the rights, powers, privileges and duties of the retiring Administrative Agent (other than any rights to indemnity payments owed to the retiring Administrative Agent), and the retiring Administrative Agent shall be discharged from all of its duties and obligations hereunder or under the other Loan Documents. The fees payable by the Borrower to a successor Administrative Agent shall be the same as those payable to its predecessor unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and such successor. After the retiring Administrative Agent’s resignation hereunder and under the other Loan Documents, the provisions of this ARTICLE IX and Section 10.03 shall continue in effect for the benefit of such retiring Administrative Agent, its sub agents and their respective Related Parties in respect of any actions taken or omitted to be taken by any of them while the retiring Administrative Agent was acting as the Administrative Agent hereunder.
Section 9.10      No Other Duties, Etc. . Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, none of the bookrunners, Arrangers, the Syndication Agents or the Documentation Agents listed on the cover page hereof shall have any powers, duties or responsibilities under this Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents, except in its capacity, as applicable, as the Administrative Agent, a Lender or an Issuing Bank hereunder.
Section 9.11      Administrative Agent May File Proofs of Claim . In case of the pendency of any proceeding under any Debtor Relief Law, the Administrative Agent (irrespective of whether the principal of any Loan or LC Disbursement shall then be due and payable as herein expressed or by declaration or otherwise and irrespective of whether the Administrative Agent shall have made any demand on the Borrower) shall be entitled and empowered (but not obligated) by intervention in such proceeding or otherwise:
(a)      to file and prove a claim for the whole amount of the principal and interest owing and unpaid in respect of the Loans, LC Disbursements and all other obligations that are owing and unpaid and to file such other documents as may be necessary or advisable in order to have the claims of the Lenders, the Issuing Banks and the Administrative Agent (including any claim for the reasonable compensation, expenses, disbursements and advances of the Lenders, the Issuing Banks and the Administrative Agent and their respective agents and counsel and all other amounts due the Lenders, the Issuing Banks and the Administrative Agent under Sections 2.04 and 10.03) allowed in such judicial proceeding; and
(b)      to collect and receive any monies or other property payable or deliverable on any such claims and to distribute the same;
and any custodian, receiver, assignee, trustee, liquidator, sequestrator or other similar official in any such judicial proceeding is hereby authorized by each Lender and Issuing Bank to make such payments to the Administrative Agent and, in the event that the Administrative Agent shall consent to the making of such payments directly to the Lenders and the Issuing Banks, to pay to the Administrative Agent any amount due for the reasonable compensation, expenses, disbursements

67



and advances of the Administrative Agent and its agents and counsel, and any other amounts due the Administrative Agent under Sections 2.04 and 10.03.
ARTICLE X
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 10.01      Notices . (a) Except in the case of notices and other communications expressly permitted to be given by telephone, all notices and other communications provided for herein shall be in writing and shall be delivered by hand or overnight courier service, mailed by certified or registered mail or sent by facsimile, as follows:
(i)      if to the Borrower, to it at 1201 Lake Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77380, Attention of the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Facsimile No. (832) 636-0278; messenger delivery to 1201 Lake Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77380;
(ii)      if to the Administrative Agent, to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Houston Energy Group, 1000 Louisiana Street, 9th Floor, MAC T0002-090, Houston, Texas 77002, Attention of Mark Cox, Facsimile No.: (713) 319-1679;
(iii)      if to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as an Issuing Bank, to it at Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Houston Energy Group, 1000 Louisiana Street, 9th Floor, MAC T0002-090, Houston, Texas 77002, Attention of Mark Cox, Facsimile No.: (713) 319-1679;
(iv)      if to the Swingline Lender, to it at the address set forth in paragraph (b) above; or
(v)      if to any other Issuing Bank or Lender, to it at its address (or facsimile number) set forth in its Administrative Questionnaire.
Notices sent by hand or overnight courier service, or mailed by certified or registered mail, shall be deemed to have been given when received; notices sent by facsimile shall be deemed to have been given when sent (except that, if not given during normal business hours for the recipient, shall be deemed to have been given at the opening of business on the next business day for the recipient). Notices delivered through electronic communications, to the extent provided in paragraph (b) below, shall be effective as provided in said paragraph (b).
(b)      Notices and other communications to the Lenders and the Issuing Banks hereunder may be delivered or furnished by electronic communication (including e-mail and Internet or intranet websites) pursuant to procedures approved by the Administrative Agent, provided that the foregoing shall not apply to notices to any Lender or Issuing Bank pursuant to ARTICLE II if such Lender or Issuing Bank, as applicable, has notified the Administrative Agent that it is incapable of receiving notices under such Article by electronic communication. The Administrative Agent or the Borrower may, in its discretion, agree to accept notices and other communications to it

68



hereunder by electronic communications pursuant to procedures approved by it; provided that approval of such procedures may be limited to particular notices or communications.
Unless the Administrative Agent otherwise prescribes, (i) notices and other communications sent to an e-mail address shall be deemed received upon the sender’s receipt of an acknowledgement from the intended recipient (such as by the “return receipt requested” function, as available, return e-mail or other written acknowledgement), and (ii) notices or communications posted to an internet or intranet website shall be deemed received upon the deemed receipt by the intended recipient, at its e-mail address as described in the foregoing clause (i), of notification that such notice or communication is available and identifying the website address therefor; provided that, for both clauses (i) and (ii) above, if such notice, email or other communication is not sent during the normal business hours of the recipient, such notice or communication shall be deemed to have been sent at the opening of business on the next business day for the recipient.
(c)      Any party hereto may change its address or facsimile number for notices and other communications hereunder by notice to the other parties hereto.
(d)      The Borrower agrees that the Administrative Agent may, but shall not be obligated to, make the Communications (as defined below) available to the Issuing Banks and the other Lenders by posting the Communications on Debt Domain, Intralinks, Syndtrak or a substantially similar electronic transmission system (the “ Platform ”). The Platform is provided “as is” and “as available.” The Agent Parties (as defined below) do not warrant the adequacy of the Platform and expressly disclaim liability for errors or omissions in the Communications. No warranty of any kind, express, implied or statutory, including, without limitation, any warranty of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, non-infringement of third-party rights or freedom from viruses or other code defects, is made by any Agent Party in connection with the Communications or the Platform. In no event shall the Administrative Agent or any of its Related Parties (collectively, the “ Agent Parties ”) have any liability to the Borrower, any Lender or any other Person or entity for damages of any kind, including, without limitation, direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages, losses or expenses (whether in tort, contract or otherwise) arising out of the Borrower’s or the Administrative Agent’s transmission of communications through the Platform. “ Communications ” means, collectively, any notice, demand, communication, information, document or other material provided by or on behalf of the Borrower pursuant to any Loan Document or the transactions contemplated therein which is distributed to the Administrative Agent, any Lender or any Issuing Bank by means of electronic communications pursuant to this Section, including through the Platform.
Section 10.02      Waivers; Amendments .
(a)      No failure or delay by the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Lender in exercising any right or power hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such right or power, or any abandonment or discontinuance of steps to enforce such a right or power, preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right or power. The rights and remedies of the Administrative Agent, the Issuing Banks, and the Lenders hereunder are cumulative and are not exclusive of any rights or remedies that they would otherwise have. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement or consent to any departure

69



by the Borrower therefrom shall in any event be effective unless the same shall be permitted by paragraph (b) of this Section, and then such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the purpose for which given. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the making of a Loan or issuance of a Letter of Credit shall not be construed as a waiver of any Event of Default, regardless of whether the Administrative Agent, any Lender or any Issuing Bank may have had notice or knowledge of such Event of Default at the time.
(b)      Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof may be waived, amended or modified except pursuant to an agreement or agreements in writing entered into by the Borrower and the Majority Lenders or by the Borrower and the Administrative Agent with the consent of the Majority Lenders; provided that no such agreement shall (i) increase the Commitment of any Lender without the written consent of such Lender, (ii) reduce any Principal Amount or LC Disbursement or reduce the rate of interest thereon, or (subject to clause (ii) of the second further proviso hereafter) reduce any fees payable hereunder, without the written consent of each Lender affected thereby, (iii) postpone the scheduled date of payment of any Principal Amount or LC Disbursement, or any interest thereon, or any fees payable hereunder, or reduce the amount of, waive or excuse any such payment, or postpone the scheduled date of expiration of any Commitment, without the written consent of each Lender affected thereby, (iv) extend the expiry date of any Letter of Credit beyond the then scheduled Revolving Commitment Termination Date without the written consent of each Lender, (v) change Section 2.13(a) or Section 2.13(c) in a manner that would alter the pro rata sharing of payments required thereby, without the written consent of each Lender, (vi) change Section 7.01, without the consent of each Lender, or (vii) change any of the provisions of this Section or the definition of “Majority Lenders” or any other provision hereof specifying the number or percentage of Lenders required to waive, amend or modify any rights hereunder or make any determination or grant any consent hereunder, without the written consent of each Lender; provided further , that no such agreement shall amend, modify or otherwise affect the rights or duties of the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or the Swingline Lender hereunder without the prior written consent of the Administrative Agent, such Issuing Bank or the Swingline Lender; provided further , (i) the Administrative Agent and the Borrower shall be permitted to amend any provision of the Loan Documents (and such amendment shall become effective without any further action or consent of any other party to any Loan Document) if the Administrative Agent and the Borrower shall have jointly identified an obvious error or any error, ambiguity, defect or inconsistency or omission of a technical or immaterial nature in any such provision, and (ii) the Administrative Agent and the Borrower may, without the consent of any Lender, enter into amendments or modifications to this Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents or to enter into additional Loan Documents as the Administrative Agent and the Borrower reasonably deem appropriate in order to implement any Replacement Rate or otherwise effectuate the terms of Section 2.25 in accordance with the terms of Section 2.25, subject to Majority Lenders’ right to object thereto as provided in such Section 2.25. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, no Defaulting Lender shall have any right to approve or disapprove any amendment, waiver or consent hereunder (and any amendment, waiver or consent which by its terms requires the consent of all Lenders or each affected Lender may be effected with the consent of the applicable Lenders other than Defaulting Lenders), except that the Commitment of such Lender may not be increased or extended or the principal owed to such Lender reduced, or the final maturity thereof extended, without the consent of such Lender; provided , that

70



any amendment to this clause shall require the approval of each Lender, including any Defaulting Lender.
Section 10.03      Expenses; Indemnity; Damage Waiver .
(a)      The Borrower shall pay (i) all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the Administrative Agent and its Affiliates, including the reasonable fees, charges and disbursements of a single legal counsel for the Administrative Agent and the Arrangers (and of a single local counsel in each appropriate jurisdiction), in connection with the syndication (prior to the date hereof) of the credit facilities provided for herein, the preparation, execution, delivery and administration of this Agreement or any amendments, modifications or waivers of the provisions hereof (whether or not the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby shall be consummated but subject to the cap on legal expenses and other out-of-pocket expenses agreed with the Administrative Agent), (ii) all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the Issuing Banks in connection with the issuance, amendment, renewal or extension of any Letter of Credit or any demand for payment thereunder and (iii) all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Lender, including the fees, charges and disbursements of one counsel for the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Lender and a single local counsel in each appropriate jurisdiction (and, in the case of an actual or perceived conflict of interest among such Persons and notice to the Borrower of such conflict, such individual counsel as such affected Persons may retain), in connection with the enforcement or protection of its rights in connection with this Agreement, including its rights under this Section, or in connection with the Loans made or Letters of Credit issued hereunder, including all such reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred during any workout, restructuring or negotiations in respect of such Loans or Letters of Credit. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the Borrower shall not have any obligation to pay the fees or expenses of any Lender or the Administrative Agent in connection with any assignment of, or the grant of any participation in, any rights of a Lender under or in connection with this Agreement; provided that the provisions of this sentence shall not apply to any Lender substituted for a Defaulting Lender pursuant to Section 10.13(a).
(b)      The Borrower shall indemnify the Administrative Agent, each Issuing Bank, the Swingline Lender, and each Lender, and each Related Party of any of the foregoing Persons (each such Person being called an “ Indemnitee ”) against, and hold each Indemnitee harmless from, any and all losses, penalties, claims, damages, liabilities and related expenses, including the fees, charges and disbursements of one primary counsel for all such Persons, taken as a whole, and a single local counsel in each appropriate jurisdiction (and, in the case of an actual or perceived conflict of interest among such Indemnitees and notice to the Borrower of such conflict, such individual counsel as such affected Indemnitees may retain), incurred by or asserted against any Indemnitee arising out of, in connection with, or as a result of (i) the execution or delivery of this Agreement or any agreement or instrument contemplated hereby, the performance by the parties hereto of their respective obligations hereunder or the consummation of the Transactions, (ii) any Loan or Letter of Credit or the use of the proceeds therefrom (including any refusal by an Issuing Bank to honor a demand for payment under a Letter of Credit if the documents presented in connection with such demand do not strictly comply with the terms of such Letter of Credit), (iii) any actual or alleged presence or release of hazardous materials on or from any property owned or

71



operated by the Borrower or any Subsidiary, or any liability that Borrower or any Subsidiary may have under Environmental Laws, or, or (iv) any actual or prospective claim, litigation, investigation or proceeding relating to any of the foregoing, whether based on contract, tort or any other theory and regardless of whether any Indemnitee is a party thereto; provided that such indemnity shall not, as to any Indemnitee, be available to the extent that such losses, penalties, claims, damages, liabilities or related expenses (i) did not result directly or indirectly from the action or inaction of the Borrower or any Subsidiary, (ii) resulted from the gross negligence, bad faith, unlawful conduct or willful misconduct of such Indemnitee as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction by final and nonappealable judgment, (iii) result from a material breach of such Indemnitee’s obligations hereunder as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction by final and nonappealable judgment or (iv)  result from disputes, claims, demands, actions, judgments or suits not arising from any act or omission by the Borrower or its Affiliates, brought by an Indemnitee against any other Indemnitee (other than disputes, claims, demands, actions, judgments or suits involving claims against any Agent in its capacity as such). This Section 10.03(b) shall not apply with respect to Taxes other than any Taxes that represent losses, claims, damages, etc. arising from any non-Tax claim.
(c)      To the extent that the Borrower fails to pay any amount required to be paid by them to the Administrative Agent, an Issuing Bank or the Swingline Lender under paragraph (a) or (b) of this Section, each Lender severally agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent, such Issuing Bank or the Swingline Lender, as the case may be, such Lender’s Applicable Percentage (determined as of the time that the applicable unreimbursed expense or indemnity payment is sought) of such unpaid amount; provided that the unreimbursed expense or indemnified loss, claim, damage, liability or related expense, as the case may be, was incurred by or asserted against the Administrative Agent, such Issuing Bank or the Swingline Lender in its capacity as such.
(d)      To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, each party hereto and each of its respective Related Parties shall not assert, and hereby waives, any claim against each other party hereto and its Related Parties (including, as applicable, each Indemnitee), on any theory of liability, for special, indirect, consequential or punitive damages (as opposed to direct or actual damages) arising out of, in connection with, or as a result of, this Agreement, any other Loan Document or any agreement or instrument contemplated hereby, the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby, any Loan or Letter of Credit, or the use of the proceeds thereof, provided, however, that the foregoing shall not limit the Borrower’s indemnification obligations pursuant to this Section 10.03. No Indemnitee referred to in subsection (b) above shall be liable for any damages arising from the use by unintended recipients of any information or other materials distributed by it through telecommunications, electronic or other information transmission systems in connection with this Agreement or the other Loan Documents or the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby.
(e)      All amounts due under this Section shall be payable promptly after written demand therefor together with a copy of the invoice(s) or other documentation setting forth in reasonable detail the amount demanded and the matter(s) to which it relates.
Section 10.04      Successors and Assigns .
(a)      The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns permitted hereby (including

72



any Affiliate of an Issuing Bank that issues any Letter of Credit), except that (i) the Borrower may not assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations hereunder except (A) pursuant to a merger or amalgamation permitted under Section 6.08 or (B) with the prior written consent of the Administrative Agent and each Lender (and any attempted assignment or transfer by the Borrower without such consent shall be null and void) and (ii) no Lender may assign or otherwise transfer its rights or obligations hereunder except in accordance with this Section. Nothing in this Agreement, expressed or implied, shall be construed to confer upon any Person (other than the parties hereto, their respective successors and assigns permitted hereby (including any Affiliate of an Issuing Bank that issues any Letter of Credit), Participants (to the extent provided in paragraph (c) of this Section) and, to the extent expressly contemplated hereby, the Related Parties of the Administrative Agent, the Issuing Banks and the Lenders) any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or by reason of this Agreement.
(b)      (i) Subject to the conditions set forth in paragraph (b)(ii) below, any Lender may assign to one or more assignees all or a portion of its rights and obligations under this Agreement (including all or a portion of its Commitment and the Loans at the time owing to it) with the prior written consent (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed) of:
(A)      the Borrower, provided that no consent of the Borrower shall be required for an assignment to a Lender, an Affiliate of a Lender or, if an Event of Default under Section 8.01(a), (b), (f), (g), (h) or (i) has occurred and is continuing, any other assignee; and
(B)      the Administrative Agent and the Issuing Banks.
(ii)      Assignments shall be subject to the following additional conditions:
(A)      except in the case of an assignment to a Lender or an Affiliate of a Lender or an assignment of the entire remaining amount of the assigning Lender’s Commitment or Loans, the amount of the Commitment or Loans of the assigning Lender subject to each such assignment (determined as of the date the Assignment and Assumption with respect to such assignment is delivered to the Administrative Agent or, if “Trade Date” is specified in the Assignment and Assumption, as of the Trade Date) shall not be less than $5,000,000 unless each of the Borrower and the Administrative Agent otherwise consent, provided that no such consent of the Borrower shall be required if an Event of Default under Section 8.01(a), (b), (g), (h) or (i) has occurred and is continuing;
(B)      each partial assignment shall be made as an assignment of a proportionate part of all the assigning Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement and, unless each of the Borrower and the Administrative Agent otherwise consent, shall result in the assigning Lender having no less than $10,000,000 in Commitments and Loans after giving effect to such assignment;

73



(C)      the parties to each assignment shall execute and deliver to the Administrative Agent an Assignment and Assumption, together with a processing and recordation fee of $3,500;
(D)      the assignee, if it shall not be a Lender, shall deliver to the Administrative Agent an Administrative Questionnaire;
(E)      no such assignment shall be made (1) to the Borrower or any of the Borrower’s Affiliates or Subsidiaries or (2) to any Defaulting Lender or any of its Subsidiaries, or any Person who, upon becoming a Lender hereunder, would constitute any of the foregoing Persons described in this clause (2);
(F)      no such assignment shall be made to a natural Person (or a holding company, investment vehicle or trust for, or owned and operated for the primary benefit of, a natural Person); and
(G)      in connection with any assignment of rights and obligations of any Defaulting Lender hereunder, no such assignment shall be effective unless and until, in addition to the other conditions thereto set forth herein, the parties to the assignment shall make such additional payments to the Administrative Agent in an aggregate amount sufficient, upon distribution thereof as appropriate (which may be outright payment, purchases by the assignee of participations or subparticipations, or other compensating actions, including funding, with the consent of the Borrower and the Administrative Agent, the applicable pro rata share of Loans previously requested but not funded by the Defaulting Lender, to each of which the applicable assignee and assignor hereby irrevocably consent), to (x) pay and satisfy in full all payment liabilities then owed by such Defaulting Lender to the Administrative Agent, each Issuing Bank, each Swingline Lender and each other Lender hereunder (and interest accrued thereon), and (y) acquire (and fund as appropriate) its full pro rata share of all Loans and participations in Letters of Credit and Swingline Loans in accordance with its Applicable Percentage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that any assignment of rights and obligations of any Defaulting Lender hereunder shall become effective under applicable law without compliance with the provisions of this paragraph, then the assignee of such interest shall be deemed to be a Defaulting Lender for all purposes of this Agreement until such compliance occurs.
(iii)      Subject to acceptance and recording thereof by the Administrative Agent pursuant to paragraph (b)(v) of this Section, from and after the effective date specified in each Assignment and Assumption the assignee thereunder shall be a party hereto and, to the extent of the interest assigned by such Assignment and Assumption, have the rights and obligations of a Lender under this Agreement, and the assigning Lender thereunder shall, to the extent of the interest assigned by such Assignment and Assumption, be released from its obligations under this Agreement (and, in the case of an Assignment and Assumption covering all of the assigning Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement, such Lender shall cease to be

74



a party hereto) but shall continue to be entitled to the benefits of Section 2.14, Section 2.16, Section 2.21 and Section 10.03 with respect to facts and circumstances occurring prior to the effective date of such assignment; provided , that except to the extent otherwise expressly agreed by the affected parties, no assignment by a Defaulting Lender will constitute a waiver or release of any claim of any party hereunder arising from that Lender’s having been a Defaulting Lender. Any assignment or transfer by a Lender of rights or obligations under this Agreement that does not comply with this Section 10.04 shall be treated for purposes of this Agreement as a sale by such Lender of a participation in such rights and obligations in accordance with paragraph (c) of this Section.
(iv)      The Administrative Agent, acting solely for this purpose as a non-fiduciary agent of the Borrower, shall maintain a copy of each Assignment and Assumption delivered to it and a register for the recordation of the names and addresses of the Lenders, and the Commitment of, and principal amounts (and stated interest) of the Loans and LC Disbursements owing to, each Lender pursuant to the terms hereof from time to time (the “ Register ”). The entries in the Register shall be prima facie evidence of the existence and amounts of the obligations recorded therein, and the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, the Issuing Banks and the Lenders may treat each Person whose name is recorded in the Register pursuant to the terms hereof as a Lender hereunder for all purposes of this Agreement, notwithstanding notice to the contrary. The Register shall be available for inspection by the Borrower, any Issuing Bank and any Lender, at any reasonable time and from time to time upon reasonable prior notice.
(v)      Upon its receipt of a duly completed Assignment and Assumption executed by an assigning Lender and an assignee, the assignee’s completed Administrative Questionnaire (unless the assignee shall already be a Lender hereunder), the processing and recordation fee referred to in paragraph (b)(ii)(C) of this Section and any written consent to such assignment required by paragraph (b)(i) of this Section and upon satisfaction of the additional conditions set forth in paragraph (b)(ii) of this Section, the Administrative Agent shall accept such Assignment and Assumption and record the information contained therein in the Register maintained at the New York office of the Administrative Agent. No assignment shall be effective for purposes of this Agreement unless it has been recorded in the applicable Register as provided in this paragraph.
(c)      Any Lender may, without the consent of the Borrower, the Administrative Agent or any Issuing Bank, sell participations to one or more banks or other entities (other than a natural Person (or a holding company, investment vehicle or trust for, or owned and operated for the primary benefit of, a natural Person), a Defaulting Lender or the Borrower or its Affiliates) (each, a “ Participant ”) in all or a portion of such Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement (including all or a portion of its Commitment and the Loans owing to it); provided that (A) such Lender’s obligations under this Agreement shall remain unchanged, (B) such Lender shall remain solely responsible to the other parties hereto for the performance of such obligations and

75



(C) the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, the Issuing Banks and the other Lenders shall continue to deal solely and directly with such Lender in connection with such Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement. Any agreement or instrument pursuant to which a Lender sells such a participation shall provide that such Lender shall retain the sole right to enforce this Agreement and to approve any amendment, modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement; provided that such agreement or instrument may provide that such Lender will not, without the consent of the Participant, agree to any amendment, modification or waiver described in the first proviso to Section 10.02(b) that affects such Participant. The Borrower agrees that each Participant shall be entitled to the benefits of Section 2.14, Section 2.16 and Section 2.21 (subject to the requirements and limitations therein, including the requirements under Section 2.16(e) (it being understood that the documentation required under Section 2.16(e) shall be delivered to the participating Lender)) to the same extent as if it were a Lender and had acquired its interest by assignment pursuant to paragraph (b) of this Section; provided that such Participant (A) agrees to be subject to the provisions of Section 10.13 as if it were an assignee under paragraph (b) of this Section; and (B) shall not be entitled to receive any greater payment under Section 2.14 or Section 2.16, with respect to any participation, than its participating Lender would have been entitled to receive. Each Lender that sells a participation agrees, at the Borrower’s request and expense, to use reasonable efforts to cooperate with the Borrower to effectuate the provisions of Section 10.13 with respect to any Participant. To the extent permitted by law, each Participant also shall be entitled to the benefits of Section 10.08 as though it were a Lender; provided that such Participant agrees to be subject to Section 2.13(c) as though it were a Lender. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, unless otherwise contractually agreed, no Participant shall be entitled to the benefits of Section 10.08 as though it were a Lender. Each Lender that sells a participation shall, acting solely for this purpose as a non-fiduciary agent of the Borrower, maintain a register on which it enters the name and address of each Participant and the principal amounts (and stated interest) of each Participant’s interest in the Loans or other obligations under the Loan Documents (the “ Participant Register ”); provided that no Lender shall have any obligation to disclose all or any portion of the Participant Register (including the identity of any Participant or any information relating to a Participant’s interest in any commitments, loans, letters of credit or its other obligations under any Loan Document) to any Person except to the extent that such disclosure is necessary to establish that such commitment, loan, letter of credit or other obligation is in registered form under Section 5f.103-1(c) of the United States Treasury Regulations. The entries in the Participant Register shall be conclusive absent manifest error, and such Lender shall treat each Person whose name is recorded in the Participant Register as the owner of such participation for all purposes of this Agreement notwithstanding any notice to the contrary. For the avoidance of doubt, the Administrative Agent (in its capacity as Administrative Agent) shall have no responsibility for maintaining a Participant Register.
(d)      Any Lender may at any time pledge or assign a security interest in all or any portion of its rights under this Agreement to secure obligations of such Lender, including any pledge or assignment to secure obligations to a Federal Reserve Bank in accordance with Regulation A of the Board or other central banking authority, and to a trustee for the benefit of holders of debt securities issued by such Lender, and this Section shall not apply to any such pledge or assignment of a security interest; provided that no such pledge or assignment of a security interest shall release a Lender from any of its obligations hereunder or substitute any such pledgee or assignee for such Lender as a party hereto.

76



Section 10.05      Survival . All covenants, agreements, representations and warranties made by the Borrower herein and in the certificates or other instruments delivered in connection with or pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered to have been relied upon by the other parties hereto and shall survive the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the making of any Loans and issuance of any Letters of Credit, regardless of any investigation made by any such other party or on its behalf and notwithstanding that the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Lender may have had notice or knowledge of any Event of Default or incorrect representation or warranty at the time any credit is extended hereunder, and shall continue in full force and effect as long as the principal of or any accrued interest on any Loan or any fee or any other amount payable under this Agreement is outstanding and unpaid or any Letter of Credit is outstanding and so long as the Commitments have not expired or terminated. The provisions of Section 2.14, Section 2.16, Section 2.21, Section 2.22, Section 10.03, this Section 10.05, and ARTICLE IX shall survive and remain in full force and effect regardless of the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, the repayment of the Loans, the expiration or termination of the Letters of Credit and the Commitments or the termination of this Agreement or any other provision hereof.
Section 10.06      Counterparts; Integration; Effectiveness . This Agreement may be executed in counterparts (and by different parties hereto in different counterparts), each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute a single contract. This Agreement, the other Loan Documents and any separate letter agreements with respect to fees payable to the Administrative Agent constitute the entire contract among the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersede any and all previous agreements and understandings, oral or written, relating to the subject matter hereof. Except as provided in Section 7.01, this Agreement shall become effective when it shall have been executed by the Administrative Agent and when the Administrative Agent shall have received counterparts hereof which, when taken together, bear the signatures of each of the other parties hereto, and thereafter shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Agreement by facsimile or in electronic (i.e., “pdf” or “tif”) format shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Agreement. The words “execution,” “signed,” “signature,” and words of like import in any Assignment and Assumption shall be deemed to include electronic signatures or the keeping of records in electronic form, each of which shall be of the same legal effect, validity or enforceability as a manually executed signature or the use of a paper-based recordkeeping system, as the case may be, to the extent and as provided for in any applicable law, including the Federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, the New York State Electronic Signatures and Records Act, or any other similar state laws based on the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act.
Section 10.07      Severability . Any provision of this Agreement held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability without affecting the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof; and the invalidity of a particular provision in a particular jurisdiction shall not invalidate such provision in any other jurisdiction.
Section 10.08      Right of Setoff . If (a) an Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing, and (b) the principal of the Loans has been accelerated, each Lender, each Issuing Bank,

77



and each of their respective Affiliates is hereby authorized at any time and from time to time, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, to set off and apply any and all deposits (general or special, time or demand, provisional or final) at any time held and other obligations at any time owing by such Lender, such Issuing Bank or any such Affiliate, to or for the credit or the account of the Borrower against any and all of the obligations of the Borrower now or hereafter existing under this Agreement or any other Loan Document to such Lender, Issuing Bank or their respective Affiliates, irrespective of whether or not such Lender, Issuing Bank or Affiliate shall have made any demand under this Agreement or any other Loan Document and although such obligations may be contingent or unmatured or are owed to a branch, office or Affiliate of such Lender or such Issuing Bank different from the branch, office or Affiliate holding such deposit or obligated on such indebtedness; provided that in the event that any Defaulting Lender shall exercise any such right of setoff, (x) all amounts so set off shall be paid over immediately to the Administrative Agent for further application in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.23 and, pending such payment, shall be segregated by such Defaulting Lender from its other funds and deemed held in trust for the benefit of the Administrative Agent, the Issuing Banks, and the Lenders, and (y) the Defaulting Lender shall provide promptly to the Administrative Agent a statement describing in reasonable detail the obligations owing to such Defaulting Lender as to which it exercised such right of setoff. The rights of each Lender, each Issuing Bank and their respective Affiliates under this Section are in addition to other rights and remedies (including other rights of setoff) that such Lender, such Issuing Bank or their respective Affiliates may have. Each Lender and Issuing Bank agrees to notify the Borrower and the Administrative Agent promptly after any such setoff and application; provided that the failure to give such notice shall not affect the validity of such setoff and application.
Section 10.09      Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Consent to Service of Process .
(a)      THIS AGREEMENT AND THE NOTES SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND GOVERNED BY THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
(b)      Each party hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally submits, for itself and its property, to the nonexclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, sitting in New York County and of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York, and any appellate court from either thereof, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the Notes, or the other Loan Documents, or for recognition or enforcement of any judgment, and each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees that all claims in respect of any such action or proceeding may be heard and determined in such New York State court or, to the extent permitted by law, in such Federal court. Each of the parties hereto agrees that a final judgment in any such action or proceeding shall be conclusive and may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by law. Nothing in this Agreement or any other Loan Document shall affect any right that the Administrative Agent, any of the other agents, any Issuing Bank or any Lender may otherwise have to bring any action or proceeding relating to this Agreement against the Borrower or its properties in the courts of any jurisdiction.

78



(c)      Each party to this Agreement irrevocably consents to service of process in the manner provided for notices in Section 10.01. Nothing in this Agreement will affect the right of any party to this Agreement to serve process in any other manner permitted by law.
Section 10.10      WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL . EACH PARTY HERETO HEREBY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THE LOAN DOCUMENTS OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY (WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT OR ANY OTHER THEORY). EACH PARTY HERETO (a) CERTIFIES THAT NO REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING WAIVER AND (b) ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT AND THE OTHER PARTIES HERETO HAVE BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THIS SECTION.
Section 10.11      Headings . Article and Section headings and the Table of Contents used herein are for convenience of reference only, are not part of this Agreement and shall not affect the construction of, or be taken into consideration in interpreting, this Agreement.
Section 10.12      Confidentiality . The Administrative Agent, the Issuing Banks and the Lenders agrees to maintain the confidentiality of the Information (as defined below), except that Information may be disclosed (a) to its and its Affiliates’ directors, officers, employees and agents, including accountants, legal counsel and other advisors who have a reason to use such Information in connection with the administration of this Agreement (it being understood that the Persons to whom such disclosure is made will be informed of the confidential nature of such Information and instructed to keep such Information confidential and will agree to use the Information solely for the purpose of such administration), (b) to the extent requested by any regulatory authority or any self-regulatory body having authority to regulate or oversee any aspect of any Lender’s (or any Affiliate of such Lender) business or property, (c) to the extent required by applicable laws or regulations or by any subpoena or similar legal process, (d) to any other party to this Agreement, (e) in connection with the exercise of any remedies hereunder or any suit, action or proceeding relating to this Agreement or the enforcement of rights hereunder, (f) subject to an agreement containing provisions substantially the same as those of this Section, to any assignee of or Participant in, or any prospective assignee of or Participant in, any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement, or to any counterparty (or its advisor) to any swap, securitization, or derivative transaction referencing or involving any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement, (g) on a confidential basis to (i) any rating agency in connection with rating the Borrower or its Subsidiaries or the credit facilities provided for herein or (ii) the CUSIP Service Bureau or any similar agency in connection with the issuance and monitoring of CUSIP numbers with respect to the credit facilities provided for herein; (h) with the consent of the Borrower; (i) with the consent of the Borrower, or (j) to the extent such Information (x) becomes publicly available other than as a result of a breach of this Section or (y) becomes available to the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank, or any

79



Lender on a non-confidential basis from a source other than the Borrower or any of its Affiliates. For the purposes of this Section, “ Information ” means all information received from the Borrower relating to the Borrower or its business, other than any such information that is available to the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank, or any Lender on a non-confidential basis prior to disclosure by the Borrower; provided that, in the case of information received from the Borrower after the date hereof, such information is clearly identified at the time of delivery as confidential. Any Person required to maintain the confidentiality of Information as provided in this Section shall be considered to have complied with its obligation to do so if such Person has exercised the same degree of care to maintain the confidentiality of such Information as such Person would accord to its own confidential information.
Section 10.13      Replacement of Lenders .
(a)      If (i) the obligation of any Lender to make Eurodollar Loans or continue Loans as Eurodollar Loans has been suspended pursuant to Section 2.15, (ii) any Lender requests compensation under Section 2.14, (iii) the Borrower is required to pay any additional amount to any Lender or Governmental Authority under Section 2.16, (iv) any Lender becomes a Defaulting Lender, (v) the Borrower exercises its right to replace a Declining Lender pursuant to Section 2.24, (vi) any Lender has failed to consent to a proposed amendment, waiver, discharge or termination that pursuant to the terms of Section 10.02 requires the consent of all of the Lenders affected or the Majority Lenders and with respect to which the Majority Lenders shall have granted their consent or (vii) any other circumstance exists hereunder that gives the Borrower the right to replace a Lender, then the Borrower may, at its sole expense and effort, upon notice to such Lender and the Administrative Agent, require such Lender to assign and delegate, without recourse (in accordance with and subject to the restrictions contained in, and consents required by, Section 10.04), all of its interests, rights (other than its existing rights to payments pursuant to Section 2.14 or Section 2.16) and obligations under this Agreement and the related Loan Documents to an assignee that shall assume such obligations (which assignee may be another Lender, if a Lender accepts such assignment), provided that:
(A)      the Borrower shall have paid to the Administrative Agent the assignment fee specified in Section 10.04;
(B)      such Lender shall have received payment of an amount equal to the Principal Amount of its Loans and participations in LC Disbursements, accrued interest thereon, accrued fees and all other amounts payable to it hereunder and under the other Loan Documents (including any amounts under Section 2.21) from the assignee (to the extent of such Principal Amount, accrued interest and fees) or the Borrower (in the case of all other amounts);
(C)      in the case of any such assignment resulting from a claim for compensation under Section 2.14 or payments required to be made pursuant to Section 2.16, such assignment will result in a reduction in such compensation or payments thereafter; and
(D)      such assignment does not conflict with applicable Laws.

80



(b)      Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, each party hereto agrees that any assignment pursuant to the terms of this Section 10.13 may be effected pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption executed by only the Borrower, the Administrative Agent and the assignee, with a copy to such affected Lender.
(c)      To the extent any Letter of Credit is outstanding as of the date this Agreement is terminated as to any Lender under Section 10.13(a) above, each continuing Lender shall be deemed to have acquired, and each terminated Lender shall be deemed to transfer, such portions of the existing participations in such Letter of Credit (but not any participations in LC Disbursements paid for pursuant to clause (B) of the proviso at the end of Section 10.13(a) above) as shall cause the participations therein of all Lenders to be pro rata in accordance with the Applicable Percentages of all Lenders on such date (after giving effect to the termination of the Commitments of the terminated Lenders; provided that no Lender’s Commitment may be increased as a result thereof without such Lender’s consent given in accordance with Section 2.09).
Section 10.14      USA Patriot Act Notice . Each Lender hereby notifies the Borrower that pursuant to the requirements of the USA Patriot Act (Title III of Pub. L. 107-56 (signed into law October 26, 2001)) (the “ USA Patriot Act ”), it is required to obtain, verify and record information that identifies the Borrower and its Subsidiaries, which information includes the name and address of the Borrower and such Subsidiaries and other information that will allow such Lender to identify the Borrower and such Subsidiaries in accordance with the USA Patriot Act.
Section 10.15      No Advisory or Fiduciary Responsibility . In connection with all aspects of each transaction contemplated by this Agreement, Borrower acknowledges and agrees, and acknowledges its Affiliates’ understanding, that: (i) the credit facilities provided for hereunder and any related services in connection therewith (including in connection with any amendment, waiver or other modification hereof or of any other Loan Document) are an arm’s-length commercial transaction between Borrower and its Affiliates, on the one hand, and Administrative Agent and Lenders, on the other hand, and Borrower is capable of evaluating and understanding and understands and accepts the terms, risks and conditions of the transactions contemplated hereby and by the other Loan Documents (including any amendment, waiver or other modification hereof or thereof); (ii) in connection with the process leading to such transaction, Administrative Agent and each Lender is and has been acting solely as a principal and is not the financial advisor, agent or fiduciary, for Borrower or any of its Affiliates, stockholders, creditors or employees or any other Person; (iii) neither Administrative Agent nor any Lender has assumed nor will assume an advisory, agency or fiduciary responsibility in favor of Borrower with respect to any of the transactions contemplated hereby or the process leading thereto, including with respect to any amendment, waiver or other modification hereof or of any other Loan Document (irrespective of whether Administrative Agent or any Lender has advised or is currently advising Borrower or any of its Affiliates on other matters) and neither Administrative Agent nor any Lender has any obligation to Borrower or any of its Affiliates with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby except those obligations expressly set forth herein and in the other Loan Documents; (iv) Administrative Agent, Lenders and their respective Affiliates may be engaged in a broad range of transactions that involve interests that differ from those of Borrower and its Affiliates, and neither Administrative Agent, nor

81



any Lender, nor any of their respective Affiliates, has any obligation to disclose any of such interests by virtue of any advisory, agency or fiduciary relationship; and (v) neither Administrative Agent nor any Lender will provide any legal, accounting, regulatory or tax advice with respect to any of the transactions contemplated hereby (including any amendment, waiver or other modification hereof or of any other Loan Document) and Borrower has consulted its own legal, accounting, regulatory and tax advisors to the extent it has deemed appropriate.  Borrower hereby waives and releases, to the fullest extent permitted by Law, any claims that it may have against Administrative Agent or any Lender with respect to any breach or alleged breach of agency or fiduciary duty.
Section 10.16      Amendment and Restatement . The undersigned Lenders, to the extent a party to the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement (the “ Existing Lenders ”), agree and acknowledge that in connection with the amendment and restatement of the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement pursuant hereto, the Borrower, the Administrative Agent and the Existing Lenders shall make adjustments to (i) the outstanding principal amount of “Revolving Loans” (as defined in the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement, but not any interest accrued thereon prior to the Effective Date or any accrued facility fees under the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement prior to the Effective Date), including the borrowing of such additional “Revolving Loans” (which may include “Eurodollar Loans”, as defined in the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement) and the repayment of “Revolving Loans” (which may include the prepayment or conversion of “Eurodollar Loans”) plus all applicable accrued interest, fees and expenses as shall be necessary to provide for Revolving Loans by each Lender in the amount of its new Applicable Percentage of all Revolving Loans as of the Effective Date, and (ii) participations in any outstanding “Letters of Credit” (as defined in the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement) issued under the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement, including the Letter of Credit listed on Schedule III attached hereto (the “ Existing Letters of Credit ”) to provide for each Lender’s participation in such Existing Letters of Credit equal to such Lender’s new Applicable Percentage of the aggregate amount available to be drawn under each such Existing Letter of Credit as of the Effective Date. In connection with the foregoing (a) each Existing Lender shall be deemed to have made an assignment of its outstanding Revolving Loans and “Commitments” (as defined in the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement) under the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement, and assumed outstanding Revolving Loans and Commitments of other Existing Lenders under the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement, all at the request of the Borrower, as may be necessary to effect the foregoing, and each Existing Lender hereby waives any right to any reimbursement under Section 2.21 hereof with respect thereto, and (b) each Existing Letter of Credit shall be deemed to be a Letter of Credit issued hereunder as of the Effective Date for all purposes hereof. Each of the undersigned Existing Lenders, waives any requirement under the Existing Revolving Credit Agreement that notice with respect to any such borrowing, prepayment or other transaction described in this Section 10.16 be given.
Section 10.17      Acknowledgment and Consent to Bail-In of EEA Financial Institution . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any Loan Document or in any other agreement, arrangement or understanding among any such parties, each party hereto acknowledges that any liability of any EEA Financial Institution arising under any Loan Document, to the extent such liability is unsecured, may be subject to the write-down and conversion powers of an EEA Resolution Authority and agrees and consents to, and acknowledges and agrees to be bound by:

82



(a) the application of any Write-Down and Conversion Powers by an EEA Resolution Authority to any such liabilities arising hereunder which may be payable to it by any party hereto that is an EEA Financial Institution; and
(b) the effects of any Bail-In Action on any such liability, including, if applicable:
(i) a reduction in full or in part or cancellation of any such liability;
(ii) a conversion of all, or a portion of, such liability into shares or other instruments of ownership in such EEA Financial Institution, its parent undertaking, or a bridge institution that may be issued to it or otherwise conferred on it, and that such shares or other instruments of ownership will be accepted by it in lieu of any rights with respect to any such liability under this Agreement or any other Loan Document; or
(iii) the variation of the terms of such liability in connection with the exercise of the Write-Down and Conversion powers of any EEA Resolution Authority.

[SIGNATURES BEGIN ON NEXT PAGE]


83



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized as of the day and year first above written.
BORROWER:
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
 
 
 
 
By:
Western Gas Holdings, LLC, its general partner
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Benjamin M. Fink
 
Name:
Benjamin M. Fink
 
Title:
President and Chief Executive Officer


[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND LENDER :
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
 
as Administrative Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Borden Tennant
 
Name:
Borden Tennant
 
Title:
Vice President



[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



SYNDICATION AGENT AND LENDER :
THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD.,
 
as a Syndication Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Sherwin Brandford
 
Name:
Sherwin Brandford
 
Title:
Director


[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



SYNDICATION AGENT AND LENDER :
CITIBANK N.A.,
 
as a Syndication Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Maureen Maroney
 
Name:
Maureen Maroney
 
Title:
Vice President


[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



SYNDICATION AGENT AND LENDER :
MIZUHO BANK, LTD.,
 
as a Syndication Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Leon Mo
 
Name:
Leon Mo
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



SYNDICATION AGENT AND LENDER :
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
 
as a Syndication Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Stephen Monto
 
Name:
Stephen Monto
 
Title:
SVP

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



SYNDICATION AGENT AND LENDER :
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
 
as a Syndication Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Patrick Jeffrey
 
Name:
Patrick Jeffrey
 
Title:
Vice President

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



DOCUMENTATION AGENT AND LENDER :
BANK OF MONTREAL,
 
as a Documentation Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Melissa Guzmann
 
Name:
Melissa Guzmann
 
Title:
Director

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



DOCUMENTATION AGENT AND LENDER :
BARCLAYS BANK PLC,
 
as a Documentation Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Sydney G. Dennis
 
Name:
Sydney G. Dennis
 
Title:
Director

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



DOCUMENTATION AGENT AND LENDER :
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY,
 
as a Documentation Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ DeVon J. Lang
 
Name:
DeVon J. Lang
 
Title:
Senior Vice President

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



DOCUMENTATION AGENT AND LENDER :
CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
 
as a Documentation Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Stuart Gibson
 
Name:
Stuart Gibson
 
Title:
Managing Director

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



DOCUMENTATION AGENT AND LENDER :
CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH,
 
as a Documentation Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Nupur Kumar
 
Name:
Nupur Kumar
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Andrew Griffin
 
Name:
Andrew Griffin
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



DOCUMENTATION AGENT AND LENDER :
DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH,
 
as a Documentation Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Ming K. Chu
 
Name:
Ming K. Chu
 
Title:
Director
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Virginia Cosenza
 
Name:
Virginia Cosenza
 
Title:
Vice President

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



DOCUMENTATION AGENT AND LENDER :
MORGAN STANLEY BANK, N.A.,
 
as a Documentation Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Michael King
 
Name:
Michael King
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



DOCUMENTATION AGENT AND LENDER :
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA,
 
as a Documentation Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Jay T. Sartain
 
Name:
Jay T. Sartain
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



DOCUMENTATION AGENT AND LENDER :
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA,
 
as a Documentation Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Donovan Crandall
 
Name:
Donovan Crandall
 
Title:
Managing Director

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



DOCUMENTATION AGENT AND LENDER :
THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK,
NEW YORK BRANCH,
 
as a Documentation Agent and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Annie Dorval
 
Name:
Annie Dorval
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



LENDER:
COMERICA BANK
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ William B. Robinson
 
Name:
William B. Robinson
 
Title:
Senior Vice President

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



LENDER:
SOCIETE GENERALE
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Diego Medina
 
Name:
Diego Medina
 
Title:
Director

[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



LENDER:
ZB, N.A. DBA AMEGY BANK
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ G. Scott Collins
 
Name:
G. Scott Collins
 
Title:
Senior Vice President
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Miles Sedillo
 
Name:
Miles Sedillo
 
Title:
Assistant Vice President


[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



LENDER:
STIFEL BANK & TRUST
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Daniel P. McDonald
 
Name:
Daniel. P. McDonald
 
Title:
Assistant Vice President


[Signature Page - $1,500,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement]



ANNEX I
LIST OF COMMITMENTS

Lenders
Initial Amount of
Commitment
Applicable Percentage
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

$100,000,000

6.666666667
%
The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.

$100,000,000

6.666666667
%
Citibank, N.A.

$100,000,000

6.666666667
%
Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

$100,000,000

6.666666667
%
PNC Bank, National Association

$100,000,000

6.666666667
%
U.S. Bank National Association

$100,000,000

6.666666667
%
Bank of Montreal

$75,000,000

5.000000000
%
Barclays Bank PLC

$75,000,000

5.000000000
%
Branch Banking and Trust Company

$75,000,000

5.000000000
%
Capital One, National Association

$75,000,000

5.000000000
%
Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch

$75,000,000

5.000000000
%
Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch

$75,000,000

5.000000000
%
Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A.

$75,000,000

5.000000000
%
Royal Bank of Canada

$75,000,000

5.000000000
%
The Bank of Nova Scotia

$75,000,000

5.000000000
%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank, New York Branch

$75,000,000

5.000000000
%
Comerica Bank

$52,500,000

3.500000000
%
Société Générale

$52,500,000

3.500000000
%
ZB, N.A. dba Amegy Bank

$30,000,000

2.000000000
%
Stifel Bank & Trust

$15,000,000

1.000000000
%
Total

$1,500,000,000

100.00000
%




Annex I-1
List of Commitments



ANNEX II
MAXIMUM LC ISSUANCE AMOUNTS

Issuing Banks
Maximum LC Issuance Amount
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

$50,000,000

The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.

$10,000,000

Citibank, N.A.

$10,000,000

Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

$10,000,000

PNC Bank, National Association

$10,000,000

U.S. Bank National Association

$10,000,000

Total

$100,000,000





Annex II-1
Maximum LC Issuance Amounts



SCHEDULE I
PRICING SCHEDULE

Pricing shall be based upon the Borrower’s rating on its senior unsecured non-credit enhanced publicly held indebtedness as follows:
Senior Unsecured
Debt Rating
(S&P / Moody’s / Fitch)

Facility Fee
Eurodollar Margin
Base Rate Margin
Drawn Pricing (LIBOR)
        >     BBB+ / Baa1 / BBB+
0.125%
1.000%
0.000%
1.125%
             BBB / Baa2 / BBB
0.150%
1.100%
0.100%
1.250%
             BBB- / Baa3 / BBB-
0.200%
1.300%
0.300%
1.500%
        ≤ BB+ / Ba1 / BB+
0.250%
1.500%
0.500%
1.750%

Provided:
(a)    If only one rating is available, such rating shall apply;
(b)    If only two ratings are available, then (i) if there is a one level difference between the two ratings, then the higher rating shall be used, and (ii) if there is a greater than one level difference between the two ratings, then the rating one level below the higher rating will apply;
(c)    If three ratings are available, then (i) if all three are at different levels, the middle rating shall apply and (ii) if two ratings correspond to the same level and the third is different, the rating corresponding to the two same levels shall apply; and
(d)    If no rating is available, the lowest rating set forth on the above grid shall apply.


Schedule I
Pricing Schedule



SCHEDULE II
AFFILIATE AGREEMENTS
1.
Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement by and among Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Resources, Inc., WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR Operating, LP, dated as of May 14, 2008.
2.
Contribution Agreement, dated as of November 11, 2008, by and among Western Gas Resources, Inc., WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR Operating, LP.
3.
Contribution Agreement, dated as of July 10, 2009, by and among Western Gas Resources, Inc., WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, Anadarko Uintah Midstream, LLC, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, WES GP, Inc., Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR Operating, LP.
4.
Contribution Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2010 by and among Western Gas Resources, Inc., WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, Mountain Gas Resources LLC, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, WES GP, Inc., Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR Operating, LP.
5.
Contribution Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2010, by and among Western Gas Resources, Inc., WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, WES GP, Inc., Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR Operating, LP.
6.
Contribution Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2011, by and among Western Gas Resources, Inc., WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, WES GP, Inc., Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR Operating, LP.
7.
Contribution Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2013, by and among Anadarko Marcellus Midstream, L.L.C., Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC, WGR Operating, LP, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC.
8.
Contribution Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2014, by and among WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, APC Midstream Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC, WGR Operating, LP and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation.


Schedule II
Affiliate Agreements



9.
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2015, by and among WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, Delaware Basin Midstream, LLC, Western Gas Partners, LP, and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation.
10.
Amendment No. 1 to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2017, by and between WGR Asset Holding Company LLC and Delaware Basin Midstream, LLC.
11.
Contribution Agreement, dated as of February 24, 2016, by and among WGR Asset Holding Company, LLC, APC Midstream Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC, WGR Operating, LP and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation.
12.
Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP, dated March 14, 2016. Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP, dated March 14, 2016. Amendment No. 2 to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP, dated February 22, 2017. Amendment No. 3 to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP, dated November 9, 2017.
13.
Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Western Gas Holdings, LLC, dated December 12, 2012.
14.
Omnibus Agreement by and among Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Holdings, LLC and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, dated as of May 14, 2008. Amendment No. 1 to Omnibus Agreement by and among Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, dated as of December 19, 2008. Amendment No. 2 to Omnibus Agreement by and among Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, dated as of July 22, 2009. Amendment No. 3 to Omnibus Agreement by and among Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, dated as of December 31, 2009. Amendment No. 4 to Omnibus Agreement by and among Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, dated as of January 29, 2010. Amendment No. 5 to Omnibus Agreement by and among Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, dated as of August 2, 2010.
15.
Services and Secondment Agreement between Western Gas Holdings, LLC and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation dated May 14, 2008. Amendment No. 1 to Services and Secondment Agreement between Western Gas Holdings, LLC and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation dated December 10, 2015.

Schedule II
Affiliate Agreements



16.
Tax Sharing Agreement by and among Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and Western Gas Partners, LP, dated as of May 14, 2008.
17.
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Fixed Rate Note due 2038.
18.
Agreements for the gathering, processing, treatment, compression, storage or transportation of hydrocarbons, or the gathering and disposal of produced water, between Western Gas Partners, LP or one of its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation or one of its affiliates, on the other hand.
19.
Commodity Price Swap Agreements (the form of which is on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission) between the Partnership and Anadarko.
20.
Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between Western Gas Holdings, LLC, its Officers and Directors.
21.
Western Gas Partners, LP 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
22.
Western Gas Partners, LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
23.
Fourth Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement, dated March 14, 2016, between Western Gas Holdings, LLC and Western Gas Resources, Inc.
24.
AMH Indemnification Agreement, dated March 3, 2014, between Western Gas Holdings, LLC and APC Midstream Holdings, LLC.
25.
KWC Indemnification Agreement, dated March 14, 2016, between Western Gas Holdings, LLC and Kerr-McGee Worldwide Corporation.
26.
Unit Purchase Agreement, dated October 28, 2014, by and among Western Gas Partners, LP, APC Midstream Holdings, LLC and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation.

Schedule II
Affiliate Agreements



SCHEDULE III
EXISTING LETTERS OF CREDIT
1.    Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. IS0021876U dated March 7, 2013, issued by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, for the account of WGR Operating LP, in favor of Medina Electric Cooperative, Inc., as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated December 11, 2015, in the amount of $4,583,296.

Schedule III
Existing Letters of Credit



EXHIBIT A
FORM OF NOTE
____________, 20__
For value received, Western Gas Partners LP, a limited partnership formed under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “ Borrower ”), promises to pay to __________ or its registered
assigns (the “ Lender ”) at the office of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association specified in Section 2.13(a) of the Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 2018, among the Borrower, the Lender, the several other banks party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, the Documentation Agents named therein, and the Syndication Agent named therein, (as may be amended, supplemented or modified from time to time hereafter, the “ Agreement ”; with capitalized terms defined in the Agreement and not otherwise defined herein being used herein as therein defined), in lawful money of the United States of America the principal sum of ____________ DOLLARS ($___________) or, if less than such principal sum, the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all Loans made by the Lender to the Borrower pursuant to Section 2.01 of the Agreement. Such principal shall be payable on the date or dates specified in Section 2.02 of, or elsewhere in, the Agreement.
The undersigned further agrees to pay interest at said office, in like money, on the unpaid principal amount owing hereunder from time to time from the date of the applicable Loan at the rates specified in Section 2.10 of the Agreement. Such interest shall be payable on the dates specified in Section 2.10 of the Agreement. The date, Type, and amount of each Loan made by the Lender pursuant to Section 2.01 of the Agreement, each continuation of all or a portion thereof to another Type and the date and amount of each payment of principal with respect thereto shall be recorded by the holder of this Note on Schedule A annexed hereto, which holder may add additional pages to such Schedule. No failure to make or error in making any such recording as authorized hereby shall affect the validity of the obligations of the Borrower hereunder or the validity of any payment hereof made by the Borrower.
This Note is one of the Notes referred to in the Agreement and is entitled to the benefits thereof and is subject to prepayment in whole or in part as provided therein.
Upon the occurrence of any one or more of the Events of Default specified in the Agreement, all amounts then remaining unpaid on this Note may be declared to be immediately due and payable as provided in the Agreement.
This Note is a registered note for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Administrative Agent shall maintain a register in which it shall record the name of the Lender and no transfer shall be effective until such transfer is recorded on the register. Prior to the recordation in the register, the Borrower may treat the person in whose name this Note is registered as the Lender for the purpose of receiving payments and for all other purposes of this note and the Agreement.
THIS NOTE SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND BE GOVERNED BY THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

Exhibit A-1
Form of Note



 
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
 
 
 
 
By:
Western Gas Holdings, LLC,
its general partner
 
 
 
 
By:
 
 
Name:
 
 
Title:
 


Exhibit A-2
Form of Note



SCHEDULE A
LOANS AND REPAYMENTS

Amount of Loan
 
Type of Loan
 
Interest Rate
 
Amount of Principal Repaid
 
Notation Made by
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Exhibit A-3
Form of Note



EXHIBIT B
FORM OF ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION
This Assignment and Assumption (the “ Assignment and Assumption ”) is dated as of the Effective Date set forth below and is entered into by and between [the][each] 1 Assignor identified in item 1 below ([the][each, an] “ Assignor ”) and [the][each] 2 Assignee identified in item 2 below ([the][each, an] “ Assignee ”). [It is understood and agreed that the rights and obligations of [the Assignors][the Assignees] 3 hereunder are several and not joint.] 4 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement identified below (as amended, the “ Credit Agreement ”), receipt of a copy of which is hereby acknowledged by [the][each] Assignee. The Standard Terms and Conditions set forth in Annex 1 attached hereto are hereby agreed to and incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Assignment and Assumption as if set forth herein in full.
For an agreed consideration, [the][each] Assignor hereby irrevocably sells and assigns to [the Assignee][the respective Assignees], and [the][each] Assignee hereby irrevocably purchases and assumes from [the Assignor][the respective Assignors], subject to and in accordance with the Standard Terms and Conditions and the Credit Agreement, as of the Effective Date inserted by Administrative Agent as contemplated below (i) all of [the Assignor’s][the respective Assignors’] rights and obligations in [its capacity as a Lender][their respective capacities as Lenders] under the Credit Agreement and any other documents or instruments delivered pursuant thereto to the extent related to the amount and percentage interest identified below of all of such outstanding rights and obligations of [the Assignor][the respective Assignors] under the respective facilities identified below (including without limitation any letters of credit and swingline loans included in such facilities), and (ii) to the extent permitted to be assigned under applicable law, all claims, suits, causes of action and any other right of [the Assignor (in its capacity as a Lender)][the respective Assignors (in their respective capacities as Lenders)] against any Person, whether known or unknown, arising under or in connection with the Credit Agreement, any other documents or instruments delivered pursuant thereto or the loan transactions governed thereby or in any way based on or related to any of the foregoing, including, but not limited to, contract claims, tort claims, malpractice claims, statutory claims and all other claims at law or in equity related to the rights and obligations sold and assigned pursuant to clause (i) above (the rights and obligations sold and assigned by [the][any] Assignor to [the][any] Assignee pursuant to clauses (i) and (ii) above being referred to herein collectively as [the][an] “ Assigned Interest ”). Each such sale and assignment is without recourse to [the][any] Assignor and, except as expressly provided in this Assignment and Assumption, without representation or warranty by [the][any] Assignor.
1.
Assignor[s]:    _______________________________
_______________________________
1 For bracketed language here and elsewhere in this form relating to the Assignor(s), if the assignment is from a single Assignor, choose the first bracketed language. If the assignment is from multiple Assignors, choose the second bracketed language.
2 For bracketed language here and elsewhere in this form relating to the Assignee(s), if the assignment is to a single Assignee, choose the first bracketed language. If the assignment is to multiple Assignees, choose the second bracketed language.
3 Select as appropriate.
4 Include bracketed language if there are either multiple Assignors or multiple Assignees.

Exhibit B-1
Form of Assignment and Assumption



[Assignor [is] [is not] a Defaulting Lender]
2.
Assignee[s]:    _______________________________
[for each Assignee, indicate [Affiliate] of [ identify Lender ]]
3.
Borrower:    Western Gas Partners, LP
4.
Administrative Agent:    
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the administrative agent under the Credit Agreement
5.
Credit Agreement:    Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 2018, among Western Gas Partners, LP, the Lenders party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, the Documentation Agents named therein, and the Syndication Agent named therein.
6.
Assigned Interest[s]:
Assignor[s] 5
Assignee[s] 6
Aggregate Amount of Commitment / Loans for all Lenders 7
Amount of Commitment / Loans Assigned 8
Percentage Assigned of Commitment /
Loans
8
CUSIP Number
 
 
$
$
%
 
 
 
$
$
%
 
 
 
$
$
%
 

[7.    Trade Date:        ______________] 9  

[Page break]




_______________________________
5 List each Assignor, as appropriate.
6 List each Assignee, as appropriate.
7 Amount to be adjusted by the counterparties to take into account any payments or prepayments made between the Trade Date and the Effective Date.
8 Set forth, to at least 9 decimals, as a percentage of the Commitment/Loans of all Lenders thereunder.
9 To be completed if the Assignor(s) and the Assignee(s) intend that the minimum assignment amount is to be determined as of the Trade Date.

Exhibit B-2
Form of Assignment and Assumption



Effective Date: ___________________, 20___ [TO BE INSERTED BY ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND WHICH SHALL BE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF RECORDATION OF TRANSFER IN THE REGISTER THEREFOR.]
The terms set forth in this Assignment and Assumption are hereby agreed to:
ASSIGNOR
[NAME OF ASSIGNOR]

By:                     
    Title:
ASSIGNEE
[NAME OF ASSIGNEE]

By:                     
    Title:
[Consented to and] 10 Accepted:

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Administrative Agent


By:
                            
    Title
[Consented to:] 11

WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
By:
Western Gas Holdings, LLC,
its general partner

By:    
                        
    Title
[Consented to:] 12

[ISSUING BANK]
By:                             
    Title
_______________________________
10 To be added only if the consent of Administrative Agent is required by the terms of the Credit Agreement.
11 To be added only if the consent of Borrower is required by the terms of the Credit Agreement.
12 To be added only if the consent of the Issuing Banks is required by the terms of the Credit Agreement.

Exhibit B-3
Form of Assignment and Assumption



ANNEX 1 to Assignment and Assumption
[WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP]
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS
FOR ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION
1. Representations and Warranties.
1.1.      Assignor[s] . [The][Each] Assignor (a) represents and warrants that (i) it is the legal and beneficial owner of [the][the relevant] Assigned Interest, (ii) [the][such] Assigned Interest is free and clear of any lien, encumbrance or other adverse claim, (iii) it has full power and authority, and has taken all action necessary, to execute and deliver this Assignment and Assumption and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and (iv) it is [not] a Defaulting Lender; and (b) assumes no responsibility with respect to (i) any statements, warranties or representations made in or in connection with the Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document, (ii) the execution, legality, validity, enforceability, genuineness, sufficiency or value of the Loan Documents or any collateral thereunder, (iii) the financial condition of Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates or any other Person obligated in respect of any Loan Document, or (iv) the performance or observance by Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates or any other Person of any of their respective obligations under any Loan Document.
1.2.      Assignee[s] . [The][Each] Assignee (a) represents and warrants that (i) it has full power and authority, and has taken all action necessary, to execute and deliver this Assignment and Assumption and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and to become a Lender under the Credit Agreement, (ii) it meets all the requirements of an assignee under Section 10.04 of the Credit Agreement (including, without limitation, the receipt of such consents, if any, as may be required under the Credit Agreement), (iii) from and after the Effective Date, it shall be bound by the provisions of the Credit Agreement as a Lender thereunder and, to the extent of [the][the relevant] Assigned Interest, shall have the obligations of a Lender thereunder, (iv) it is sophisticated with respect to decisions to acquire assets of the type represented by the Assigned Interest and either it, or the Person exercising discretion in making its decision to acquire the Assigned Interest, is experienced in acquiring assets of such type, (v) it has received a copy of the Credit Agreement, and has received or has been accorded the opportunity to receive copies of the most recent financial statements delivered pursuant to Section 4.01 thereof, as applicable, and such other documents and information as it deems appropriate to make its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Assignment and Assumption and to purchase [the][such] Assigned Interest, (vi) it has, independently and without reliance upon Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it has deemed appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Assignment and Assumption and to purchase [the][such] Assigned Interest, and (vii) attached to the Assignment and Assumption is any documentation required to be delivered by it pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, duly completed and executed by [the][such] Assignee; and (b) agrees that (i) it will, independently and without reliance on Administrative Agent, [the][any] Assignor or any other Lender, and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit decisions in taking or not taking action

Exhibit B-4
Form of Assignment and Assumption



under the Loan Documents, and (ii) it will perform in accordance with their terms all of the obligations that by the terms of the Loan Documents are required to be performed by it as a Lender.
2. Payments . From and after the Effective Date, Administrative Agent shall make all payments in respect of [the][each] Assigned Interest (including payments of principal, interest, fees and other amounts) to [the][the relevant] Assignor for amounts which have accrued to but excluding the Effective Date and to [the][the relevant] Assignee for amounts which have accrued from and after the Effective Date. 13 Notwithstanding the foregoing, Administrative Agent shall make all payments of interest, fees or other amounts paid or payable in kind from and after the Effective Date to [the][the relevant] Assignee.
3. General Provisions . This Assignment and Assumption shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. This Assignment and Assumption may be executed in any number of counterparts, which together shall constitute one instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Assignment and Assumption by telecopy shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Assignment and Assumption. This Assignment and Assumption shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.


_______________________________
13 Administrative Agent should consider whether this method conforms to its systems. In some circumstances, the following alternative language may be appropriate:
“From and after the Effective Date, Administrative Agent shall make all payments in respect of [the][each] Assigned Interest (including payments of principal, interest, fees and other amounts) to [the][the relevant] Assignee whether such amounts have accrued prior to, on or after the Effective Date. The Assignor[s] and the Assignee[s] shall make all appropriate adjustments in payments by Administrative Agent for periods prior to the Effective Date or with respect to the making of this assignment directly between themselves.”


Exhibit B-5
Form of Assignment and Assumption



EXHIBIT C
FORM OF NOTICE OF COMMITMENT INCREASE
[Date]
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Administrative Agent
Houston Energy Group
1000 Louisiana Street, 9th Floor
MAC T0002-090
Houston, TX 77002
Attention: __________

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The undersigned, Western Gas Partners, LP, refers to the Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of February 15, 2018 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ”, with capitalized terms defined in the Credit Agreement and not otherwise defined herein being used herein as therein defined) among Western Gas Partners, LP, as the Borrower, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and the Lenders and other Agents party thereto, and hereby give you notice, irrevocably, pursuant to Section 2.09(a) of the Credit Agreement that the undersigned hereby requests that the aggregate amount of the Commitments be increased and the CI Lenders agree to provide the aggregate amount of the requested Commitment Increase, and in that connection sets forth below the information relating to such proposed Commitment Increase as required by Section 2.09(a) of the Credit Agreement:
(a)    the effective date of such increase of the aggregate amount of the Commitments is [___], 20[__];
(b)    the amount of the requested increase of the aggregate Commitments is $[$10,000,000 minimum unless otherwise agreed to by the Administrative Agent in its sole discretion];
(c)    the CI Lenders, which have agreed with the Borrower to provide their respective Commitments, are: [INSERT NAMES OF THE CI LENDERS]; and
(d)    set forth on Annex I hereto is the amount of the respective Commitments of all Reducing Percentage Lenders and all CI Lenders on the effective date of such Commitment Increase.
Delivery of an executed counterpart of this Notice of Commitment Increase by telecopier shall be effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart of this Notice of Commitment Increase.

Exhibit C-1
Form of Notice of Commitment Increase



Very truly yours,

WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
 
 
 
 
By:
Western Gas Holdings, LLC,
its general partner
 
 
 
 
By:
 
 
Name:
 
 
Title:
 
 



Exhibit C-2
Form of Notice of Commitment Increase


EXHIBIT 10.23

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT (WGR)
This FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT (WGR) (this “ Amendment ”) is made and entered into as of February 15, 2018, by and between Western Gas Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ Indemnitor ”) and Western Gas Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“ Indemnitee ”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Western Gas Partners, LP (“ Borrower ”) entered into the Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement (such Agreement, as amended from time to time, the “ Third Restated Credit Agreement ”) dated as of February 15, 2018, by and among the Borrower, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, individually and as Administrative Agent, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., Mizuho Bank, LTD., PNC Bank, National Association, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Syndication Agents, Bank of Montreal, Barclays Bank PLC, Branch Banking and Trust Company, Capital One, National Association, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., Royal Bank of Canada, The Bank of Nova Scotia, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank, New York Branch, as Documentation Agents, and the Lenders party thereto, pursuant to which the borrowing limit provided for in the Second Restated Credit Agreement was increased and the maturity date in the Second Restated Credit Agreement was extended;
WHEREAS, the proceeds of Debt Securities under the Indenture have been and will be used to refinance outstanding Revolving Loans under the Restated Credit Agreement, the Second Restated Credit Agreement, and the Third Restated Credit Agreement, and for other general corporate purposes;
WHEREAS, Indemnitor, through Borrower and WGP or its predecessor, received proceeds of borrowings under the Restated Credit Agreement and the Second Restated Credit Agreement and Indenture, and may receive proceeds of borrowings under Third Restated Credit Agreement in the future; and
WHEREAS, the Indemnitor and Indemnitee entered into the Fourth Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement (WGR) as of March 14, 2016 (the “ Fourth Amended Indemnification Agreement ”), and the parties have agreed to amend the Fourth Amended Indemnification Agreement as set forth herein to reflect the execution of the Third Restated Credit Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Fourth Amended Indemnification Agreement is amended as follows:
Section 1.      Amendment . Sections 1.3, 1.6, and 5 of the Fourth Amended Indemnification Agreement are amended by replacing “Second Restated Credit Agreement” where it appears in such Sections with “Third Restated Credit Agreement.”




Section 2.      Ratification of Fourth Amended Indemnification Agreement . Except as expressly modified and amended herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Fourth Amended Indemnification Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 3.      Counterparts . This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which, taken together, shall be deemed to be one and the same Amendment.
Section 4.      Applicable Law . This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York without regard to the conflict of laws principles thereof. The parties hereby irrevocably consent to the personal jurisdiction of the Federal and State courts located in New York, and waive any defense based upon improper venue, inconvenient venue or lack of personal jurisdiction.
[Signature Page Follows]

2



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first written above.
 
WESTERN GAS RESOURCES, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
 
 
Name:
Michael C. Pearl
 
Title:
Vice President and Treasurer


 
WESTERN GAS HOLDINGS, LLC
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
 
 
Name:
Philip H. Peacock
 
Title:
Vice President




3


EXHIBIT 10.29

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FOR THOSE TERMS HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THE REDACTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH ASTERISKS (***).

Contract #8840

AMENDMENT TO GAS GATHERING AGREEMENT

This AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) to the Gas Gathering Agreement between Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC (“Gatherer”) and Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP (“Shipper”) dated July 1, 2010 (“Agreement”) is dated to be effective on January 1, 2018 (“Amendment Effective Date”). Gatherer and Shipper may each be referred to in the singular sense as a “Party” or in the collective sense as the Parties.

For additional consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement.

2. Section 3(C) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

3(C)(1) Shipper shall pay Gatherer a base Rate of $*** per MMBtu for Gas delivered and accepted at the Receipt Points.

3(C)(2) Rates and other fees and charges pursuant to this Agreement are adjusted on *** *** basis in proportion to the percentage change from the immediately preceding calendar year in the *** *** with the exception of the rate set forth in Section 3(C)(1) . Such adjustment will be made on April 1, 2016 and on each April 1 thereafter. In no event will the annual adjustment herein result in a reduction of Rates and other charges in effect immediately prior to such adjustment.

3. Except as amended herein, all other provisions of the Agreement remain in full effect as originally written or previously amended.

4. This Amendment is construed, enforced, and interpreted according to the laws of the State of Texas, without regard to the conflicts of law rules thereof.

5. This Amendment constitutes the entire agreement between and among the parties regarding the subject matter herein.

6. The Parties may execute and deliver this Amendment in any number of counterparts, including facsimile and *.pdf format counterparts, each of which is deemed an original, but all of which constitute one and the same instrument.


[Execution Page Follows]





The Parties have executed this AMENDMENT to be effective on the Amendment Effective Date.

GATHERER
 
SHIPPER
 
 
 
 
 
KERR-MCGEE GATHERING LLC
 
KERR-MCGEE OIL & GAS
ONSHORE LP
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Craig W. Collins
 
By:
/s/ Carrie L. Horton
Name:
Craig W. Collins
 
Name:
Carrie L. Horton
Title:
Senior Vice President &
Chief Operating Officer
 
Title:
Vice President





EXHIBIT 12.1

WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED UNIT DISTRIBUTIONS

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
Earnings:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
583,084

 
$
610,666

 
$
59,739

 
$
495,729

 
$
292,559

Add:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed charges
 
150,985

 
122,100

 
123,680

 
87,892

 
64,806

Distributions from equity investments
 
110,465

 
103,423

 
98,298

 
81,022

 
22,136

Amortization of capitalized interest
 
2,572

 
3,491

 
2,375

 
2,095

 
934

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity income, net – affiliates
 
85,194

 
78,717

 
71,251

 
57,836

 
22,948

Capitalized interest
 
6,826

 
5,562

 
8,318

 
9,832

 
11,945

Net income before taxes attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
10,735

 
10,963

 
10,101

 
14,025

 
10,816

Earnings
 
$
744,351

 
$
744,438

 
$
194,422

 
$
585,045

 
$
334,726

Fixed charges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense, excluding capitalized interest
 
$
149,212

 
$
120,483

 
$
122,190

 
$
86,598

 
$
63,742

Interest component of rent expense
 
1,773

 
1,617

 
1,490

 
1,294

 
1,064

Fixed charges
 
$
150,985

 
$
122,100

 
$
123,680

 
$
87,892

 
$
64,806

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred unit distributions  (1)
 
$
7,453

 
$
45,784

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Combined fixed charges and preferred unit distributions
 
$
158,438

 
$
167,884

 
$
123,680

 
$
87,892

 
$
64,806

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (2)
 
4.9x

 
6.1x

 
1.6x

 
6.7x

 
5.2x

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred unit distributions (2) (3)
 
4.7x

 
4.4x

 
1.6x

 
6.7x

 
5.2x

__________________________________________________________________
(1)  
Represents the distributions associated with the Series A Preferred units issued in 2016. The Series A Preferred units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis in 2017.
(2)  
These ratios were computed by dividing earnings by fixed charges and by combined fixed charges and preferred unit distributions, respectively. For this purpose, earnings include pre-tax income, plus fixed charges to the extent they affect current year earnings, amortization of capitalized interest and distributed income of equity investments, less equity income, noncontrolling interests in pre-tax income from subsidiaries that did not incur fixed charges, and interest capitalized during the year. Fixed charges include interest expensed and capitalized, amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness, and estimates of interest within rental expenses.
(3)  
No preferred units were outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.





EXHIBIT 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
Western Gas Partners, LP
As of December 31, 2017
 
Anadarko Gathering Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Anadarko Wattenberg Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Chipeta Processing LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
DBM Crude Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
DBM Pipeline, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
DBM Water Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Delaware Basin Express, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Delaware Basin JV Gathering LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Delaware Basin Midstream, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
GNB NGL Pipeline LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC, a Colorado limited liability company
MIGC LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Mountain Gas Resources LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Mountain Gas Transportation LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Overland Trail Transmission, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Springfield Pipeline LLC, a Texas limited liability company
Western Gas Operating, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Western Gas Wyoming, L.L.C., a Wyoming limited liability company
WGR Operating, LP, a Delaware limited partnership





EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors and Unitholders
Western Gas Holdings, LLC (as general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP):

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No 333‑214446) on Form S-3, (No. 333‑216583) on Form S-3, (No. 333‑219242) on Form S-3, (No. 333‑151317) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-222040) on Form S-8 of Western Gas Partners, LP of our reports dated February 16, 2018 , with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Western Gas Partners, LP and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , and the related consolidated statements of operations, equity and partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017 , and the related notes (collectively, the “consolidated financial statements”), and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 , which reports appear in the December 31, 2017 annual report on Form 10‑K of Western Gas Partners, LP dated February 16, 2018 .



/s/ KPMG LLP
Houston, Texas
February 16, 2018





EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) AND RULE 15D-14(A)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
I, Benjamin M. Fink, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Western Gas Partners, LP (the “registrant”);
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 16, 2018
 
 
/s/ Benjamin M. Fink
 
Benjamin M. Fink
President and Chief Executive Officer
Western Gas Holdings, LLC
(as general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP)




EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) AND RULE 15D-14(A)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
I, Jaime R. Casas, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Western Gas Partners, LP (the “registrant”);
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 16, 2018

 
/s/ Jaime R. Casas
 
Jaime R. Casas
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Western Gas Holdings, LLC
(as general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP)




EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, Benjamin M. Fink, President and Chief Executive Officer of Western Gas Holdings, LLC, the general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP (the “Partnership”) and Jaime R. Casas, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Western Gas Holdings, LLC, certify to the best of our knowledge that:
 
(1)
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Partnership for the period ending December 31, 2017 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
February 16, 2018
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
/s/ Benjamin M. Fink
 
  
Benjamin M. Fink
President and Chief Executive Officer
Western Gas Holdings, LLC
(as general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP)
 
 
 
February 16, 2018
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
/s/ Jaime R. Casas
 
  
Jaime R. Casas
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Western Gas Holdings, LLC
(as general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP)
The foregoing certifications are being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, are not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Partnership, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.